Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K
R ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from             to              
Commission File No. 1-11778

ACE LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Switzerland
 
98-0091805
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Baerengasse 32
Zurich, Switzerland CH-8001
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
+41 (0)43 456 76 00
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, par value CHF 28.89 per share
 
New York Stock Exchange
 
 
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES R NO ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
YES ¨ NO R
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES R NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES R NO ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer   R
 
 
 
 
 
Accelerated filer ¨  
Non-accelerated filer   ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company  ¨  
  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO R
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates as of June 29, 2012 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter), was approximately $ 25 billion. For the purposes of this computation, shares held by directors and officers of the registrant have been excluded. Such exclusion is not intended, nor shall it be deemed, to be an admission that such persons are affiliates of the registrant.
As of February 14, 2013 there were 339,318,053 Common Shares par value CHF 28.89 of the registrant outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Certain portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.


Table of Contents

ACE LIMITED INDEX TO 10-K

PART I
 
Page
ITEM 1.
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
 
 
 
PART II
 
 
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9B.
 
 
 
PART III
 
 
ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.
 
 
 
PART IV
 
 
ITEM 15.



Table of Contents
PART I




ITEM 1. Business
General Development of Business
ACE Limited is the Swiss-incorporated holding company of the ACE Group of Companies. ACE opened its business office in Bermuda in 1985 and continues to maintain operations in Bermuda. ACE Limited, which is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the ACE Group of Companies, ACE, we, us, or our) are a global insurance and reinsurance organization, serving the needs of a diverse group of clients around the world. We offer commercial insurance products and service offerings such as risk management programs, loss control and engineering and complex claims management. We provide specialized insurance products ranging from Directors & Officers (D&O) and professional liability to various specialty-casualty and umbrella and excess casualty lines to niche areas such as aviation and energy. We also offer personal lines insurance coverage including homeowners, automobile, valuables, umbrella liability and recreational marine products. In addition, we supply personal accident, supplemental health, and life insurance to individuals in select countries. At December 31, 2012 , we had total assets of $ 93 billion and shareholders’ equity of $ 28 billion.

We have grown our business through increased premium volume, expansion of product offerings and geographic reach, and acquisition of other companies.

On September 18, 2012, we acquired 80 percent of PT Asuransi Jaya Proteksi (JaPro) and on January 3, 2013 our local partner acquired the remaining 20 percent . Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The acquisition of JaPro diversified our business in Indonesia with a well-established personal lines insurance franchise, and expanded the potential for accident and health (A&H) and commercial property and casualty (P&C) businesses. JaPro operates under our Insurance – Overseas General segment and the consolidated financial statements include the results of JaPro from the acquisition date.

During 2012, we announced that we reached definitive agreements to acquire Fianzas Monterrey, a leading surety lines company in Mexico, as well as ABA Seguros, a P&C insurer in Mexico that provides automobile, homeowners, and small business coverages. These transactions, which are subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions, are expected to be completed in the first half of 2013. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
                                                        
Employees
At December 31, 2012 , there were over 17,000 employees in the ACE Group of Companies. We believe that employee relations are satisfactory.
                                                        
Customers
For most of the commercial lines of business that we offer, insureds typically use the services of an insurance broker or agent. An insurance broker acts as an agent for the insureds, offering advice on the types and amount of insurance to purchase and also assisting in the negotiation of price and terms and conditions. We obtain business from the local and major international insurance brokers and typically pay a commission to brokers for any business accepted and bound. Loss of all or a substantial portion of the business provided by one or more of these brokers could have a material adverse effect on our business. In our opinion, no material part of our business is dependent upon a single insured or group of insureds. We do not believe that the loss of any one insured would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations and no one insured or group of affiliated insureds account for as much as 10 percent of our total revenues.
                                                        
Competition
Competition in the insurance and reinsurance marketplace is substantial.  Competition varies by type of business and geographic area.  Competitors include other stock companies, mutual companies, alternative risk sharing groups (such as group captives and catastrophe pools), and other underwriting organizations. These companies sell through various distribution channels and business models, across a broad array of product lines, and with a high level of variation regarding geographic, marketing, and customer segmentation.  We compete for business not only on the basis of price, but also on the basis of availability of coverage desired by customers and quality of service.  Our ability to compete is dependent on a number of factors, particularly our ability to maintain the appropriate financial strength ratings as assigned by independent rating agencies.  Our broad market capabilities in personal, commercial, specialty and A&H lines made available by our underwriting expertise, business infrastructure and global presence, defines our competitive advantage. Our strong balance sheet is attractive to

2

Table of Contents

businesses, such as ceding companies requiring security solutions, and our strong capital position and global platform affords us opportunities for growth not available to smaller, less diversified insurance companies.  Refer to “Segment Information” for competitive environment by segment.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Trademarks and Trade Names
We use various trademarks and trade names in our business. These trademarks and trade names protect names of certain products and services we offer and are important to the extent they provide goodwill and name recognition in the insurance industry. We use commercially reasonable efforts to protect these proprietary rights, including various trade secret and trademark laws. One or more of the trademarks and trade names could be material to our ability to sell our products and services. We have taken appropriate steps to protect our ownership of key names and we believe it is unlikely that anyone would be able to prevent us from using names in places or circumstances material to our operations.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Available Information
We make available free of charge through our website (www.acegroup.com, under Investor Information / SEC - Section 16 Filings) our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

We also make available free of charge through our website (under Investor Information / Corporate Governance) our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Conduct, and Charters for the Committees of our Board of Directors (the Board). These documents are also available in print to any shareholder who requests them from our Investor Relations Department through the following:
Telephone:     +1 (441) 299-9283
Facsimile:     +1 (441) 292-8675
E-mail: investorrelations@acegroup.com
We also use this website as a means of disclosing material, non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under SEC Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure).  Accordingly, investors should monitor the Investor Information portion of our website, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, and public conference calls and webcasts.  The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into, and is not a part of, this report.
The public may also read and copy any materials ACE files with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC's website is http://www.sec.gov .
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Segment Information
We operate through the following business segments: Insurance – North American, Insurance – Overseas General, Global Reinsurance, and Life.

The following table presents the net premiums earned by segment for the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
2012 Net Premiums Earned

 
% of Total

 
 
2011 Net Premiums Earned

 
% of Total

 
 
2010 Net Premiums Earned

 
% of Total

Insurance – North American
 
$
7,019

 
45
%
 
 
$
6,911

 
45
%
 
 
$
5,651

 
42
%
Insurance – Overseas General
 
5,740

 
37
%
 
 
5,614

 
36
%
 
 
5,153

 
38
%
Global Reinsurance
 
1,002

 
6
%
 
 
1,003

 
7
%
 
 
1,071

 
8
%
Life
 
1,916

 
12
%
 
 
1,859

 
12
%
 
 
1,629

 
12
%
   Total
 
$
15,677

 
100
%
 
 
$
15,387

 
100
%
 
 
$
13,504

 
100
%

Additional financial information about our segments, including net premiums earned by geographic region, is included in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents


Insurance – North American

Overview
The Insurance – North American segment comprises our operations in the U.S., Canada, and Bermuda. This segment, which accounted for 45 percent of our 2012 consolidated net premiums earned, includes our retail divisions ACE USA (including ACE Canada), ACE Commercial Risk Services, and ACE Private Risk Services; our wholesale and specialty divisions ACE Westchester, ACE Agriculture, and ACE Bermuda; and various run-off operations, including Brandywine Holdings Corporation (Brandywine).

Products and Distribution
ACE USA, our retail operating division in North America, provides a broad array of traditional and specialty P&C, A&H, and risk management products and services to a diverse group of North American commercial and non-commercial enterprises and consumers. Products and services offered include property, general liability, umbrella and excess liability, workers' compensation, commercial marine, automobile liability, professional lines D&O and errors and omissions (E&O), surety, medical liability, environmental, inland marine, aerospace, A&H coverages, as well as claims and risk management products and services. ACE USA is this segment's largest operation and represented approximately 51 percent of Insurance – North American's net premiums earned in 2012 . ACE USA distributes its insurance products primarily through a limited number of retail brokers. In addition to using brokers, certain products are also distributed through general agents, independent agents, managing general agents (MGA), managing general underwriters, alliances, affinity groups, and direct marketing operations.

ACE USA's on-going operations are organized into the following distinct business units, each offering specialized products and services targeted at specific niche markets:

ACE Risk Management offers a wide range of customized casualty products to respond to the needs of mid-size to large companies, including national accounts, irrespective of industry. These programs are designed to help insureds address the significant costs of financing and managing risk for workers' compensation, as well as general and automobile liability coverages. A variety of program structures are offered to support each client's risk financing needs including: large deductible, captives, third-party rent-a-captives, funded deductibles, paid or incurred loss retrospective plans, and net present value and other risk financing structures, including a prospective close-out product. Within ACE Risk Management, ACE Financial Solutions underwrites assumed loss portfolio contracts in which insured loss events have occurred prior to the inception of the contract, when the contract carries the requisite amount of insurance risk transfer. These contracts can cause significant variances to premiums, losses and loss expenses, and expense ratios in the periods in which they are written.

ACE Foreign Casualty provides products which insure specific global operating risks of U.S.-based multinational companies. Coverage programs include Controlled Master Programs where we pair a master policy issued in the U.S. with local policies issued in foreign countries, International Advantage covering liability and incidental property coverage for U.S.-based companies with employees who travel on business outside of the U.S., and Defense Base Act Workers' Compensation which provides coverage for prime contractors and subcontractors performing work overseas under contracts authorized, approved or financed by the U.S. government or its agencies. In addition, Foreign Casualty has deductible programs, captive programs, and paid or incurred loss retrospective plans for U.S.-based insured's foreign operations.

ACE North America Property & Specialty Lines, through its specialized operating units, offers a wide range of products to diverse insureds.  Property products include primary, quota share and excess all-risk insurance for U.S. based companies with domestic or global exposures, as well as risk management programs and services for U.S. multinational companies. Commercial Marine products are available for U.S. and global marine exposures.  Inland Marine products provide solutions for the construction, transportation, warehouse and communications industries, as well as museums and other commercial institutions with fine art exposures.  Aerospace products are available for airport owners and operators, as well as satellite operators.  Other specialized units provide products for weather-related exposures, the unique needs of the energy industry, and engineering and insurance-related services for the operating units.

ACE Casualty Risk offers specialty casualty products to a broad range of customers, ranging from small, local businesses to large, multinational clients. Key coverages offered by ACE Casualty Risk include umbrella and excess liability, environmental risk for commercial and industrial risks, and casualty programs for commercial construction related projects. We also write custom casualty products for specialized industry segments and unique risks as well as products which address the needs of public entities such as educational institutions.

4

Table of Contents


ACE Professional Risk provides management liability and professional liability (D&O and E&O) products to middle market and Fortune 1000 clients.

ACE Surety offers a wide variety of Surety products to small contractors and Fortune and Industrial 2500 companies. ACE Surety specializes in underwriting both commercial and contract bonds and has the capacity for bond issuance on an international basis.

ACE Canada (ACE USA's Canadian operations) offers a broad range of P&C products as well as life and A&H coverages. ACE Canada specializes in providing customized products to commercial and industrial clients as well as to groups and associations, operating nationally or internationally.

ACE Accident & Health works with employers, travel agencies, and affinity groups to offer a variety of accident and other supplemental insurance programs. Key products include employee benefit plans, occupational accident, student accident, and worldwide travel accident and global medical programs. With respect to products that include supplemental medical and hospital indemnity coverages, we typically pay fixed amounts for claims and are therefore insulated from rising health care costs. ACE Accident & Health also provides specialty personal lines products, including credit card enhancement programs (identity theft, rental car collision damage waiver, trip travel, and purchase protection benefits) distributed through affinity groups.

ACE Medical Risk offers a wide range of liability products for the health care industry only through licensed excess and surplus lines brokers. Products include primary coverages for professional liability and general liability for selected types of medical facilities, excess/umbrella liability for medical facilities, primary and excess coverages for products liability for biotechnology and specialty pharmaceutical companies, and liability insurance for human clinical trials.

ESIS Inc. (ESIS), ACE USA's in-house third-party claims administrator, performs claims management and risk control services for domestic and international organizations, as well as for the Insurance – North American segment. These services include comprehensive medical managed care, integrated disability services, pre-loss control and risk management, and health, safety and environmental consulting. Additional insurance-related services are offered by ESIS's Recovery Services International, which provides salvage and subrogation and health care recovery services. ESIS's services are available through a preferred relationship with ACE Risk Management or separately for those clients that select insurance and claims management services independently. The net results for ESIS are included in Insurance – North American's administrative expenses.

ACE Commercial Risk Services serves the insurance needs of small and mid-sized businesses in North America with local, national or global exposures by delivering an array of specialty product solutions for targeted industries that lend themselves to technology-assisted underwriting. ACE Commercial Risk Services offers packaged policies as well as solutions that can be tailored to suit a particular product segment, multiple lines of coverage or specific distribution channels using advanced systems to efficiently transact large volumes of business. Core products and services for small businesses include: disaster protection, casualty insurance (including international casualty), environmental, inland marine, professional risk, medical risk, and claims & risk management services. These products are offered through wholesale, retail, program agent and alternative distribution channels.  In addition, ACE Commercial Risk Services offers coverage for specialty programs, writing a variety of commercial coverages through program agents.

ACE Private Risk Services provides personal lines coverages including homeowners, automobile, valuables, umbrella liability, and recreational marine insurance for high net worth individuals and families in North America. ACE Private Risk Services' products are distributed through independent regional agents and brokers.

ACE Westchester serves the market for business risks that tend to be harder to place due to unique or complex exposures and focuses on the wholesale distribution of excess and surplus lines property, casualty, environmental, professional liability and inland marine products in North America.

ACE Agriculture provides coverage for agriculture business, writing a variety of commercial coverages including comprehensive multiple peril crop, crop-hail and farm P&C insurance protection to customers in the U.S. and Canada through Rain and Hail Insurance Service, Inc. (Rain and Hail) as well as specialty P&C insurance coverages to companies that manufacture, process and distribute agriculture products through Penn Millers Insurance Company (Penn Millers). For additional information, refer to “Crop Insurance”, under Item 7.

5

Table of Contents


ACE Bermuda is our original insurance company. It provides commercial insurance products on an excess basis mainly to a global client base targeting Fortune 1000 companies and covering exposures that are generally low in frequency and high in severity. ACE Bermuda offers excess liability, professional lines, excess property, and political risk, the latter being written on a subscription basis by Sovereign Risk Insurance Ltd. (Sovereign), a wholly-owned managing agent. ACE Bermuda accesses its clients primarily through the Bermuda offices of major, internationally recognized insurance brokers.

The run-off operations do not actively sell insurance products, but are responsible for the management of certain existing policies and settlement of related claims.

Competitive Environment
ACE USA and ACE Westchester compete against a number of large, national carriers as well as regional competitors and other entities offering risk alternatives such as self-insured retentions and captive programs. The markets in which we compete are subject to significant cycles of fluctuating capacity and wide disparities in price adequacy. We strive to offer superior service, which we believe has differentiated us from our competitors. The ACE USA and ACE Westchester operations pursue a specialist strategy and focus on market opportunities where we can compete effectively based on service levels and product design, while still achieving an adequate level of profitability. A competitive advantage is also achieved through ACE USA's innovative product offerings and our ability to provide multiple products to a single client due to our nationwide local presence. An additional competitive strength of all our domestic commercial units is the ability to deliver global products and coverage to customers in concert with our Insurance – Overseas General segment. ACE USA has grown, in part, from the leveraging of cross-marketing opportunities with our other operations to take advantage of our organization's global presence. ACE Agriculture primarily operates in a federally regulated program where all approved providers offer the same product forms and rates through independent and/or captive agents. ACE Bermuda competes against international commercial carriers writing business on an excess of loss basis. ACE Commercial Risk Services competes against numerous insurance companies ranging from large national carriers to small and mid-size insurers who provide specialty coverages and standard P&C products. ACE Private Risk Services competes against insurance companies of varying sizes that sell products through various distribution channels, including through the Internet.

Insurance – Overseas General

Overview
The Insurance – Overseas General segment, which accounted for 37 percent of 2012 consolidated net premiums earned, comprises ACE International, our global retail insurance operations, the wholesale insurance business of ACE Global Markets (AGM), and the international A&H business of Combined Insurance. ACE International is our retail business serving clients ranging from local companies and insureds to large multinationals outside the U.S., Bermuda, and Canada. AGM, our London-based international specialty and excess and surplus lines business, includes Lloyd's of London (Lloyd's) Syndicate 2488 (Syndicate 2488), a wholly-owned ACE syndicate. ACE provides funds at Lloyd's to support underwriting by Syndicate 2488, which is managed by ACE Underwriting Agencies Limited and has an underwriting capacity of £350 million for 2013. The reinsurance operation of AGM is included in the Global Reinsurance segment.

Products and Distribution
ACE International maintains a presence in every major insurance market in the world and is organized geographically along product lines that provide dedicated underwriting focus to customers. ACE International's P&C business is generally written, on both a direct and assumed basis, through major international, regional, and local brokers and agents. Our A&H and other consumer lines products are distributed through brokers, agents, direct marketing programs, and sponsor relationships. Certain ACE Europe branded products are also offered via an e-commerce platform, ACE Online, that allows brokers to quote, bind, and issue specialty policies online. Property insurance products include traditional commercial fire coverage as well as energy industry-related, marine, construction, and other technical coverages. Principal casualty products are commercial primary and excess casualty, environmental, and general liability. ACE International specialty coverages include D&O professional indemnity, energy, aviation, political risk and specialty personal lines products. The A&H operations primarily offer personal accident and supplemental medical products to meet the insurance needs of individuals and groups outside of U.S. insurance markets. These coverages include accidental death, business/holiday travel, specified disease, disability, medical and hospital indemnity, and income protection coverages. We are not in the primary health care business. With respect to our supplemental medical and hospital indemnity products, we typically pay fixed amounts for claims and are therefore insulated from rising health care costs. ACE International's personal lines operations provide specialty products and services designed to meet the needs of specific target markets and include property damage, automobile, homeowners, and personal liability.

6

Table of Contents


The following is a discussion of ACE International's areas of operations: ACE Europe, ACE Asia Pacific, ACE Far East, and ACE Latin America.

ACE Europe is headquartered in London and offers a broad range of P&C, A&H, and specialty coverages throughout the European Union, Central and Eastern Europe, the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Middle East, North Africa, and South Africa. ACE's operations in these regions comprise both insurance subsidiaries and joint ventures.

ACE Asia Pacific is headquartered in Singapore and has an extensive network of operations offering a broad range of P&C, A&H, and specialty coverages principally directed at large and mid-sized corporations as well as individual consumers. This region also provides management, underwriting, reinsurance protection and administrative support to our equity investee, Huatai Insurance Company of China, Limited.

ACE Far East is based in Tokyo and offers a broad range of P&C, A&H, and personal lines insurance products and services to businesses and consumers in Japan, principally delivered through an extensive agency network.

ACE Latin America includes business operations throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, focusing on P&C, A&H, and specialty personal lines insurance products and services to both large and small commercial clients as well as individual consumers.

AGM offers products through its parallel distribution network via ACE European Group Limited (AEGL) and Syndicate 2488. AGM uses Syndicate 2488 to underwrite P&C business on a global basis through Lloyd's worldwide licenses. AGM uses AEGL to underwrite similar classes of business through its network of U.K. and European licenses, and in the U.S. where it is eligible to write excess and surplus lines business. Factors influencing the decision to place business with Syndicate 2488 or AEGL include licensing eligibilities, capitalization requirements, and client/broker preference. All business underwritten by AGM is accessed through registered brokers. The main lines of business include aviation, property, energy, professional lines, marine, political risk, and A&H.

Combined Insurance uses an international sales force of independent contractor agents to distribute a wide range of supplemental A&H products, including personal accident, short-term disability, critical conditions and cancer aid, and hospital confinement/recovery. Most of these products are primarily fixed-indemnity obligations and are not subject to escalating medical cost inflation.

Competitive Environment
ACE International's primary competitors include U.S.-based companies with global operations, as well as non-U.S. global carriers and indigenous companies in regional and local markets. For the A&H lines of business, including those offered by Combined Insurance, locally-based competitors include financial institutions and bank-owned insurance subsidiaries. Our international operations have the distinct advantage of being part of one of the few international insurance groups with a global network of licensed companies able to write policies on a locally admitted basis. The principal competitive factors that affect the international operations are underwriting expertise and pricing, relative operating efficiency, product differentiation, producer relations, and the quality of policyholder services. A competitive strength of our international operations is our global network and breadth of insurance programs, which assist individuals and business organizations to meet their risk management objectives, while also giving us the advantage of accessing local technical expertise, accomplishing a spread of risk, and offering a global network to service multinational accounts.

AGM is one of the preeminent international specialty insurers in London and is an established lead underwriter on a significant portion of the risks underwritten for all lines of business. This leadership position allows AGM to set the policy terms and conditions of many of the policies written. All lines of business face competition, depending on the business class, from Lloyd's syndicates, the London market, and other major international insurers and reinsurers. Competition for international risks is also seen from domestic insurers in the country of origin of the insured. AGM differentiates itself from competitors through long standing experience in its product lines, its multiple insurance entities (Syndicate 2488 and AEGL), and the quality of its underwriting and claims service.

7

Table of Contents


Global Reinsurance

Overview
The Global Reinsurance segment, which accounted for six percent of 2012 consolidated net premiums earned, represents ACE's reinsurance operations comprising ACE Tempest Re Bermuda, ACE Tempest Re USA, ACE Tempest Re International, and ACE Tempest Re Canada. The Global Reinsurance segment also includes AGM's reinsurance operations. Global Reinsurance markets its reinsurance products worldwide under the ACE Tempest Re brand name and provides solutions for small to mid-sized clients and multinational ceding companies including licensed reinsurance capabilities, property and workers' compensation catastrophe, loss-warranty, stop-loss cover, marine and aviation programs.

Products and Distribution
Global Reinsurance services clients globally through its major units. Major international brokers submit business to one or more of these units' underwriting teams who have built strong relationships with both key brokers and clients by providing a responsive, client-focused approach to risk assessment and pricing.

ACE Tempest Re Bermuda principally provides property catastrophe reinsurance on an excess of loss basis globally to insurers of commercial and personal property. Property catastrophe reinsurance is on an occurrence basis and protects a ceding company against an accumulation of losses covered by its issued insurance policies, arising from a common event or occurrence. ACE Tempest Re Bermuda underwrites reinsurance principally on an excess of loss basis, meaning that its exposure only arises after the ceding company's accumulated losses have exceeded the attachment point of the reinsurance policy. ACE Tempest Re Bermuda also writes other types of reinsurance on a limited basis for selected clients. Examples include proportional property where the reinsurer shares a proportional part of the premiums and losses of the ceding company and per risk excess of loss treaty reinsurance where coverage applies on a per risk basis rather than per event or aggregate basis, together with casualty and specialty lines (catastrophe workers' compensation, crop and terrorism). ACE Tempest Re Bermuda's business is produced through reinsurance intermediaries.

ACE Tempest Re USA writes all lines of traditional and specialty P&C reinsurance, and surety and fidelity reinsurance for the North American market, principally on a treaty basis, with a focus on writing property per risk and casualty reinsurance. ACE Tempest Re USA underwrites reinsurance on both a proportional and excess of loss basis. This unit's diversified portfolio is produced through reinsurance intermediaries.

ACE Tempest Re International provides traditional and specialty P&C reinsurance to insurance companies worldwide, with emphasis on non-U.S. and Canadian risks. ACE Tempest Re International writes all lines of traditional and specialty reinsurance including property risk and property catastrophe, casualty, marine, aviation, and specialty through our London- and Zurich-based divisions. The London-based divisions of ACE Tempest Re International focus on the development of business sourced through London market brokers and, consequently, write a diverse book of international business using Syndicate 2488 and AEGL. The Zurich-based division focuses on providing reinsurance to continental European insurers via continental European brokers. ACE Tempest Re International also includes our Shanghai, China office which provides reinsurance coverage for Chinese-based risks and our Sao Paulo, Brazil office which provides reinsurance for Brazilian-based risks. ACE Tempest Re International underwrites reinsurance on both a proportional and excess of loss basis.

ACE Tempest Re Canada offers a full array of traditional and specialty P&C reinsurance to the Canadian market, including casualty, property risk and property catastrophe. ACE Tempest Re Canada provides its coverage through its Canadian company platform and also offers clients access to Syndicate 2488. ACE Tempest Re Canada underwrites reinsurance on both a proportional and excess of loss basis.

Competitive Environment
The Global Reinsurance segment competes worldwide with major U.S. and non-U.S. reinsurers as well as reinsurance departments of numerous multi-line insurance organizations. Over the last several years, capital markets participants have developed financial products intended to compete with traditional reinsurance. In addition, government sponsored or backed catastrophe funds can affect demand for reinsurance. Global Reinsurance is considered a lead reinsurer and is typically involved in the negotiation and quotation of the terms and conditions of the majority of the contracts in which it participates. Global Reinsurance competes effectively in P&C markets worldwide because of its strong capital position, analytical capabilities and quality service provided to customers, the leading role it plays in setting the terms, pricing, and conditions in negotiating contracts, and its customized approach to risk selection. The key competitors in our markets vary by geographic region and product line. An advantage of our international platform is that we are able to change our mix of business in response to

8

Table of Contents

changes in competitive conditions in the territories in which we operate. Our geographic reach is also sought by multinational ceding companies since all of our offices, with the exception of Bermuda, provide local reinsurance license capabilities which benefit our clients in dealing with country regulators.

Life

Overview
The Life segment, which accounted for 12 percent of 2012 consolidated net premiums earned, includes ACE's international life operations (ACE Life), ACE Tempest Life Re (ACE Life Re), and the North American supplemental A&H and life business of Combined Insurance.

Products and Distribution
ACE Life provides individual life and group benefit insurance primarily in emerging markets, including Egypt, Hong Kong, Indonesia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; also throughout Latin America, selectively in Europe, and in China through a non-consolidated joint venture insurance company. ACE Life offers a broad portfolio of protection and savings products including whole life, endowment plans, individual term life, group term life, group medical, personal accident, credit life, universal life, and unit linked contracts. The policies written by ACE Life generally provide funds to beneficiaries of insureds after death and/or protection and/or savings benefits while the contract owner is living. ACE Life sells to consumers through a variety of distribution channels including agency, bancassurance, worksite marketing, retailers, brokers, and direct to consumer marketing. We continue to expand this business with a focus on opportunities in emerging markets that we believe will result in strong and sustainable operating profits as well as a favorable return on capital commitments over time. Our dedicated agency distribution channel, whereby agents sell ACE Life products exclusively, enables us to maintain direct contact with the individual consumer, promote quality sales practices, and exercise greater control over the future of the business. ACE Life is developing agency distribution in those countries in which we believe we can achieve sustainable growth as well as a favorable return on our investment from that channel. We have developed a substantial sales force of agents principally located in our Asia-Pacific countries. ACE maintains approximately 35.8 percent direct and indirect ownership interest in Huatai Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (Huatai Life), which commenced operations in 2005 and has since grown to become one of the largest life insurance foreign joint ventures in China. Huatai Life offers a broad portfolio of insurance products through a variety of distribution channels including approximately 310 licensed sales locations in 13 provinces within China.

ACE Life Re's core business is a Bermuda-based operation which provides reinsurance to primary life insurers, focusing on guarantees included in certain fixed and variable annuity products and also on more traditional mortality reinsurance protection. ACE Life Re's U.S.-based traditional life reinsurance operation was discontinued for new business in January 2010. Since 2007, ACE Life Re has not quoted on new opportunities in the variable annuity reinsurance marketplace and our focus has been on successfully managing the current portfolio of risk, both in the aggregate and on a contract basis. This business is managed with a long-term perspective and short-term earnings volatility is expected.

Combined Insurance distributes specialty supplemental A&H and life insurance products targeted to middle income consumers, businesses, and students through educational institutions in the U.S. and Canada. Combined Insurance's substantial North American sales force distributes a wide range of supplemental accident and sickness insurance products, including personal accident, short-term disability, critical illness, Medicare supplement products, and hospital confinement/recovery. Most of these products are primarily fixed-indemnity benefit obligations and are not subject to escalating medical cost inflation.

Competitive Environment
ACE Life's competition differs by location but generally includes multinational insurers, and in some locations, local insurers, joint ventures, or state-owned insurers. ACE's financial strength and reputation as an entrepreneurial organization with a global presence gives ACE Life a strong base from which to compete. While ACE Life Re is not currently quoting on new opportunities in the variable annuity reinsurance marketplace, we continue to monitor developments in this market. Combined Insurance competes for A&H business in the U.S. against numerous A&H and life insurance companies across various industry segments.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Underwriting
ACE is an underwriting company and we strive to emphasize quality of underwriting rather than volume of business or market share. Our underwriting strategy is to manage risk by employing consistent, disciplined pricing and risk selection. This, coupled with our holdings of less cyclical product lines, has helped us develop flexibility and stability of our business, and has allowed us to maintain a profitable book of business throughout market cycles. Clearly defined underwriting authorities, standards, and guidelines coupled with a strong underwriting audit function are in place in each of our local operations and global profit centers. Global product boards ensure consistency of approach and the establishment of best practices throughout

9

Table of Contents

the world. Our priority is to help ensure adherence to criteria for risk selection by maintaining high levels of experience and expertise in our underwriting staff. In addition, we employ a business review structure that helps ensure control of risk quality and conservative use of policy limits and terms and conditions. Underwriting discipline is at the heart of our operating philosophy.

Qualified actuaries in each region work closely with the underwriting teams to provide additional expertise in the underwriting process. We use sophisticated catastrophe loss and risk modeling techniques designed to ensure appropriate spread of risk and to analyze correlation of risk across different product lines and territories. This helps to ensure that losses are contained within our risk tolerance and appetite for individual product lines, businesses, and ACE as a whole. We also purchase reinsurance as a tool to diversify risk and limit the net loss potential of catastrophes and large or unusually hazardous risks. For additional information refer to “Reinsurance Protection”, below, “Insurance and Reinsurance Markets”, under Item 1A, “Catastrophe Management” and “Natural Catastrophe Property Reinsurance Program”, under Item 7, and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under Item 8.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reinsurance Protection
As part of our risk management strategy, we purchase reinsurance protection to mitigate our exposure to losses, including catastrophes, to an acceptable level.  Although reinsurance agreements contractually obligate our reinsurers to reimburse us for an agreed-upon portion of our gross paid losses, this reinsurance does not discharge our primary liability to our insureds and, thus, we ultimately remain liable for the gross direct losses.  In certain countries, reinsurer selection is limited by local laws or regulations. In most countries there is more freedom of choice, and the counterparty is selected based upon its financial strength, claims settlement record, management, line of business expertise, and its price for assuming the risk transferred. In support of this process, we maintain an ACE authorized reinsurer list that stratifies these authorized reinsurers by classes of business and acceptable limits. This list is maintained by our Reinsurance Security Committee (RSC), a committee comprising senior management personnel and a dedicated reinsurer security team. Changes to the list are authorized by the RSC and recommended to the Chair of the Enterprise Risk Management Board. The reinsurers on the authorized list and potential new markets are regularly reviewed and the list may be modified following these reviews. In addition to the authorized list, there is a formal exception process that allows authorized reinsurance buyers to use reinsurers already on the authorized list for higher limits or different lines of business, for example, or other reinsurers not on the authorized list if their use is supported by compelling business reasons for a particular reinsurance program.

A separate policy and process exists for captive reinsurance companies. Generally, these reinsurance companies are established by our clients or our clients have an interest in them. It is generally our policy to obtain collateral equal to the expected losses that may be ceded to the captive. Where appropriate, exceptions to the collateral requirement are granted but only after senior management review.  Specific collateral guidelines and an exception process are in place for ACE USA and Insurance – Overseas General, both of which have credit management units evaluating the captive's credit quality and that of their parent company.  The credit management units, working with actuaries, determine reasonable exposure estimates (collateral calculations), ensure receipt of collateral in an acceptable form, and coordinate collateral adjustments as and when needed.  Currently, financial reviews and expected loss evaluations are performed annually for active captive accounts and as needed for run-off exposures. In addition to collateral, parental guarantees are often used to enhance the credit quality of the captive.

In general, we seek to place our reinsurance with highly rated companies with which we have a strong trading relationship. For additional information refer to “Catastrophe Management” and “Natural Catastrophe Property Reinsurance Program” under Item 7, and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses
We establish reserves for unpaid losses and loss expenses, which are estimates of future payments on reported and unreported claims for losses and related expenses, with respect to insured events that have occurred. These reserves are recorded in Unpaid losses and loss expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. The process of establishing loss and loss expense reserves for P&C claims can be complex and is subject to considerable uncertainty as it requires the use of informed estimates and judgments based on circumstances known at the date of accrual. These estimates and judgments are based on numerous factors, and may be revised as additional experience and other data become available and are reviewed, as new or improved methodologies are developed, or as laws change. We have actuarial staff in each of our segments who regularly analyze the levels of loss and loss expense reserves, taking into consideration factors that may impact the ultimate settlement value of the unpaid losses and loss expenses. These analyses could result in future changes in the estimates of loss and loss expense reserves or reinsurance recoverables and any such changes would be reflected in our results of operations in the period in which the estimates are changed. Losses and loss expenses are charged to income as incurred. The reserve for unpaid losses and loss expenses represents the estimated ultimate losses and loss expenses less paid losses and loss expenses, and comprises

10

Table of Contents

case reserves and incurred but not reported (IBNR) loss reserves. With the exception of certain structured settlements, for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determinable, and certain reserves for unsettled claims that are discounted in statutory filings, our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money. In connection with such structured settlements and certain reserves for unsettled claims, we carried net discounted reserves of $105 million at December 31, 2012 .

During the loss settlement period, which can be many years in duration, additional facts regarding individual claims and trends often will become known. As these become apparent, case reserves may be adjusted by allocation from IBNR with or without any change in the overall reserve. In addition, the circumstances of individual claims or the application of statistical and actuarial methods to loss experience data may lead to the adjustment of the overall reserves upward or downward from time to time. Accordingly, the ultimate settlement of losses may be significantly greater than or less than reported loss and loss expense reserves.

We have considered asbestos and environmental (A&E) claims and claims expenses in establishing the liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses and have developed reserving methods which consider historical experience as well as incorporate new sources of data to estimate the ultimate losses arising from A&E exposures. The reserves for A&E claims and claims expenses represent management's best estimate of future loss and loss expense payments and recoveries that are expected to develop over the next several decades. We continuously monitor evolving case law and its effect on environmental and latent injury claims, we monitor A&E claims activity quarterly, and we perform a full reserve review annually.

For each product line, management, in conjunction with internal actuaries, develops a “best estimate” of the ultimate settlement value of the unpaid losses and loss expenses that it believes provides a reasonable estimate of the required reserve. We evaluate our estimates of reserves quarterly in light of developing information. While we are unable at this time to determine whether additional reserves may be necessary in the future, we believe that our reserves for unpaid losses and loss expenses are adequate at December 31, 2012 . Future additions to reserves, if needed, could have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. For additional information refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates - Unpaid losses and loss expenses”, under Item 7 and Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under Item 8.

The “Analysis of Losses and Loss Expenses Development” table shown below presents, for each balance sheet date over the period 2002-2012, the gross and net loss and loss expense reserves recorded at the balance sheet date and subsequent net payments on the associated liabilities. The reserves represent the amount required for the estimated future settlement value of liabilities incurred at or prior to the balance sheet date and those estimates may change subsequent to the balance sheet date as new information emerges regarding the ultimate settlement value of the liability. Accordingly, the table also presents through December 31, 2012 , for each balance sheet date, the cumulative impact of subsequent valuations of the liabilities incurred at the original balance sheet date. The data in the table is presented in accordance with reporting requirements of the SEC. This table should be interpreted with care by those not familiar with its format or those who are familiar with other triangulations arranged by origin year of loss such as accident or underwriting year rather than balance sheet date, as shown below. To clarify the interpretation of the table, we use the reserves established at December 31, 2002, in the following example.

The top two lines of the table show, for successive balance sheet dates, the gross and net unpaid losses and loss expenses recorded as provision for liabilities incurred at or prior to each balance sheet date. It can be seen that at December 31, 2002, a reserve of $12.0 billion, net of reinsurance, had been established.

The upper (paid) triangulation shows the net amounts paid as of periods subsequent to the balance sheet date. Hence in the 2003 financial year, $2.7 billion of payments were made on liabilities contemplated in the December 31, 2002, reserve balance. At the end of the 2012 financial year, there were cumulative net payments of $10.2 billion on this block of liabilities.

The lower triangulation within the table shows the revised estimate of the net liability originally recorded at each balance sheet date as of the end of subsequent financial years. With the benefit of actual loss emergence and hindsight over the intervening period, the net liabilities incurred as of December 31, 2002, are now estimated to be $14.4 billion, rather than the original estimate of $12.0 billion. One of the key drivers of this change has been adverse development on latent claims that we categorize as A&E covered under the National Indemnity Company (NICO) reinsurance treaties. Of the cumulative deficiency of $2.4 billion recognized in the ten years since December 31, 2002, $1.3 billion relates to non-latent claims and $1.1 billion relates to latent claims. The deficiency of $2.4 billion was identified and recorded as follows: $182 million deficient in 2003, $1.0 billion deficient in 2004, $262 million deficient in 2005, $313 million deficient in 2006, $362 million deficient in

11

Table of Contents

2007, $49 million deficient in 2008, $9 million deficient in 2009, $25 million redundant in 2010, $84 million deficient in 2011, and $103 million deficient in 2012.

Importantly, the cumulative deficiency or redundancy for different balance sheet dates are not independent and, therefore, should not be added together. In the last year, we revised our estimate of the December 31, 2002, liabilities from $14.3 billion to $14.4 billion. This adverse development of $103 million will also be included in each column to the right of the December 31, 2002, column to recognize that this additional amount was also required in the reserves established for each annual balance sheet date from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2012 .

The loss development table shows that our original estimate of the net unpaid loss and loss expense requirement at December 31, 2011, of $25.9 billion has, with the benefit of actual loss emergence and hindsight, been revised to $25.4 billion at December 31, 2012 .  This favorable movement of $479 million is referred to as prior period development and is the net result of a number of underlying movements both favorable and adverse.  The key underlying movements are discussed in more detail within the “Prior Period Development” section o f Item 7.
 
The bottom lines of the table show the re-estimated amount of previously recorded gross liabilities at December 31, 2012 , together with the change in reinsurance recoverable. Similar to the net liabilities, the cumulative redundancy or deficiency on the gross liability is the difference between the gross liability originally recorded and the re-estimated gross liability at December 31, 2012 . For example, with respect to the gross unpaid loss and loss expenses of $24.6 billion for December 31, 2002, this gross liability was re-estimated to be $29.9 billion at December 31, 2012 , resulting in the cumulative deficiency on the gross liability originally recorded for the 2002 balance sheet year of $5.4 billion. This deficiency relates primarily to U.S. liabilities, including A&E liabilities for 1996 and prior. The gross deficiency results in a net deficiency of $2.4 billion after consideration of substantial reinsurance coverage that reduces the gross loss; approximately $1.6 billion was covered by reinsurance placed when the risks were originally written and $1.3 billion and $108 million of the remaining insurance coverage has been ceded under the Brandywine NICO Agreement and Westchester NICO Agreement, respectively.

We do not consider it appropriate to extrapolate future deficiencies or redundancies based upon the table, as conditions and trends that have affected development of the liability in the past may not necessarily recur in the future.  We believe that our current estimates of net liabilities appropriately reflect our current knowledge of the business profile and the prevailing market, social, legal, and economic conditions while giving due consideration to historical trends and volatility evidenced in our markets over the longer term.  The key issues and considerations involved in establishing our estimate of the net liabilities are discussed in more detail within the “Critical Accounting Estimates - Unpaid losses and loss expenses” section of Item 7.

On April 1, 2008, we acquired Combined Insurance. On December 1, 2010, we acquired Jerneh Insurance Berhad. On December 28, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Rain and Hail not previously owned by us. We acquired Penn Millers Holding Corporation (PMHC) and Rio Guayas Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros (Rio Guayas) on November 30, 2011 and December 28, 2011, respectively. On September 18, 2012, we acquired 80 percent of JaPro. The unpaid loss information for these acquired businesses has been included in the table commencing in the year of acquisition.


12

Table of Contents

Analysis of Losses and Loss Expenses Development
 
Years Ended December 31
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

 
 
Gross unpaid losses
$
24,597

$
27,083

$
31,483

$
35,055

$
35,517

$
37,112

$
37,176

$
37,783

$
37,391

$
37,477

$
37,946

Net unpaid losses
11,988

14,674

17,517

20,458

22,008

23,592

24,241

25,038

25,242

25,875

26,547

Net paid losses (cumulative) as of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 year later
2,702

2,855

3,293

3,711

4,038

3,628

4,455

4,724

4,657

4,894

 
2 years later
4,379

4,878

5,483

6,487

6,356

6,092

7,526

7,510

7,281

 
 
3 years later
5,817

6,427

7,222

7,998

8,062

8,393

9,690

9,404

 
 
 
4 years later
7,009

7,819

8,066

9,269

9,748

9,949

11,114

 
 
 
 
5 years later
8,032

8,416

8,920

10,597

10,826

10,951

 
 
 
 
 
6 years later
8,390

9,049

9,810

11,428

11,496

 
 
 
 
 
 
7 years later
8,851

9,781

10,478

11,957

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8 years later
9,372

10,332

10,859

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9 years later
9,872

10,647

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10 years later
10,163

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net liability re-estimated as of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
End of year
11,988

14,674

17,517

20,458

22,008

23,592

24,241

25,038

25,242

25,875

26,547

1 year later
12,170

15,221

17,603

20,446

21,791

22,778

23,653

24,481

24,686

25,396

 
2 years later
13,215

15,468

17,651

20,366

21,188

22,158

23,127

23,801

24,167

 
 
3 years later
13,477

15,732

17,629

19,926

20,650

21,596

22,576

23,363

 
 
 
4 years later
13,790

16,015

17,509

19,589

20,080

21,037

22,184

 
 
 
 
5 years later
14,152

16,086

17,276

19,258

19,618

20,773

 
 
 
 
 
6 years later
14,201

15,994

17,116

19,136

19,584

 
 
 
 
 
 
7 years later
14,210

15,965

17,061

19,180

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8 years later
14,185

15,990

17,167

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9 years later
14,269

16,141

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10 years later
14,372

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cumulative redundancy/(deficiency) on net unpaid losses
(2,384
)
(1,467
)
350

1,278

2,424

2,819

2,057

1,675

1,075

479

 
Cumulative deficiency related to A&E
(1,053
)
(1,053
)
(588
)
(588
)
(536
)
(507
)
(456
)
(373
)
(269
)
(170
)
 
Cumulative redundancy/(deficiency) excluding A&E
(1,331
)
(414
)
938

1,866

2,960

3,326

2,513

2,048

1,344

649

 
Gross unpaid losses
24,597

27,083

31,483

35,055

35,517

37,112

37,176

37,783

37,391

37,477

37,946

Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
12,609

12,409

13,966

14,597

13,509

13,520

12,935

12,745

12,149

11,602

11,399

Net unpaid losses
11,988

14,674

17,517

20,458

22,008

23,592

24,241

25,038

25,242

25,875

26,547

Gross liability re-estimated
29,948

31,094

31,850

33,139

32,829

33,884

35,166

36,189

36,418

37,478

 
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
15,576

14,953

14,683

13,959

13,245

13,111

12,982

12,826

12,251

12,082

 
Net liability re-estimated
14,372

16,141

17,167

19,180

19,584

20,773

22,184

23,363

24,167

25,396

 
Cumulative redundancy/(deficiency) on gross unpaid losses
$
(5,351
)
$
(4,011
)
$
(367
)
$
1,916

$
2,688

$
3,228

$
2,010

$
1,594

$
973

$
(1
)
 

The reference to “losses” in the table above refers to losses and loss expenses.




13

Table of Contents

Reconciliation of Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
2012

 
 
2011

 
 
2010

Gross unpaid losses and loss expenses at beginning of year
$
37,477

 
$
37,391

 
$
37,783

Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses (1)
 
(11,602
)
 
 
(12,149
)
 
 
(12,745
)
Net unpaid losses and loss expenses at beginning of year
 
25,875

 
 
25,242

 
 
25,038

Acquisition of subsidiaries
 
14

 
 
92

 
 
145

Total
 
25,889

 
 
25,334

 
 
25,183

Net losses and loss expenses incurred in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Current year
 
10,132

 
 
10,076

 
 
8,082

      Prior years
 
(479
)
 
 
(556
)
 
 
(503
)
Total
 
9,653

 
 
9,520

 
 
7,579

Net losses and loss expenses paid in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Current year
 
4,325

 
 
4,209

 
 
2,689

      Prior years
 
4,894

 
 
4,657

 
 
4,724

Total
 
9,219

 
 
8,866

 
 
7,413

Foreign currency revaluation and other
 
224

 
 
(113
)
 
 
(107
)
Net unpaid losses and loss expenses at end of year
 
26,547

 
 
25,875

 
 
25,242

Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses (1)
 
11,399

 
 
11,602

 
 
12,149

Gross unpaid losses and loss expenses at end of year
$
37,946

 
$
37,477

 
$
37,391

(1)  
Net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance.

Net losses and loss expenses incurred for 2012 were $ 9.7 billion , compared with $9.5 billion in 2011 , and $7.6 billion in 2010 . Net losses and loss expenses incurred for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , includes $ 479 million , $556 million, and $503 million of net favorable prior period development, respectively. For additional information, refer to the “Prior Period Development” section of Item 7.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Investments
Our objective is to maximize investment income and total return while ensuring an appropriate level of liquidity, investment quality and diversification. As such, ACE's investment portfolio is invested primarily in investment-grade fixed-income securities as measured by the major rating agencies. We do not allow leverage or complex credit structures in our investment portfolio.

The critical aspects of the investment process are controlled by ACE Asset Management, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ACE. These aspects include asset allocation, portfolio and guideline design, risk management and oversight of external asset managers. In this regard, ACE Asset Management:

conducts formal asset allocation modeling for each of the ACE subsidiaries, providing formal recommendations for the portfolio's structure;
establishes recommended investment guidelines that are appropriate to the prescribed asset allocation targets;
provides the analysis, evaluation, and selection of our external investment advisors;
establishes and develops investment-related analytics to enhance portfolio engineering and risk control;
monitors and aggregates the correlated risk of the overall investment portfolio; and
provides governance over the investment process for each of our operating companies to ensure consistency of approach and adherence to investment guidelines.

Under our guidance and direction, external asset managers conduct security and sector selection and transaction execution. This use of multiple managers benefits ACE in several ways – it provides us with operational and cost efficiencies, diversity of

14

Table of Contents

styles and approaches, innovations in investment research and credit and risk management, all of which enhance the risk adjusted returns of our portfolios.

ACE Asset Management determines the investment portfolio's allowable, targeted asset allocation and ranges for each of the segments. These asset allocation targets are derived from sophisticated asset and liability modeling that measures correlated histories of returns and volatility of returns. Allowable investment classes are further refined through analysis of our operating environment, including expected volatility of cash flows, potential impact on our capital position, as well as regulatory and rating agency considerations.

The Board has established a Risk & Finance Committee which helps execute the Board's supervisory responsibilities pertaining to enterprise risk management including investment risk. Under the overall supervision of the Risk & Finance Committee, ACE's governance over investment management is rigorous and ongoing. Among its responsibilities, the Risk & Finance Committee of the Board:
reviews and approves asset allocation targets and investment policy to ensure that it is consistent with our overall goals, strategies, and objectives;
reviews and approves investment guidelines to ensure that appropriate levels of portfolio liquidity, credit quality, diversification, and volatility are maintained; and
systematically reviews the portfolio's exposures including any potential violations of investment guidelines.

We have long-standing global credit limits for our entire portfolio across the organization and for individual obligors. Exposures are aggregated, monitored, and actively managed by our Global Credit Committee, comprising senior executives, including our Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Risk Officer, our Chief Investment Officer, and our Treasurer.

Within the guidelines and asset allocation parameters established by the Risk & Finance Committee, individual investment committees of the segments determine tactical asset allocation. Additionally, these committees review all investment-related activity that affects their operating company, including the selection of outside investment advisors, proposed asset allocations changes, and the systematic review of investment guidelines.

For additional information regarding the investment portfolio, including breakdowns of the sector and maturity distributions, refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under Item 8.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Regulation
Our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries conduct business globally, including in all 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia. Our businesses in each of these jurisdictions are subject to varying degrees of regulation and supervision. The laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled require among other things that these subsidiaries maintain minimum levels of statutory capital, surplus, and liquidity, meet solvency standards, and submit to periodic examinations of their financial condition. The complex regulatory environments in which ACE operates are subject to change and are regularly monitored.

Group Supervision
In September 2012, pursuant to recently enacted legislation passed in the state of Pennsylvania, U.S., based on the Model Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act (model law) adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), the Pennsylvania Insurance Department (Department), in consultation with other insurance regulatory bodies that oversee ACE's insurance activities, convened the first ACE Group Supervisory College (College).  Regulators from approximately 15 jurisdictions worldwide were invited to participate in the College, the purpose of which was to initiate establishment of, and to clarify the membership, participation, functionality, and ongoing activities in, the College with respect to group-wide supervision of ACE.  Representatives from approximately 10 jurisdictions attended the College in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, during which the supervisors reviewed, without adverse comment, information on our group governance, risk assessment and management, capital adequacy, and material intercompany transactions.  On October 19, 2012, the Department, in cooperation with the other supervisory college regulators, published a notice of its determination that it is the appropriate group-wide supervisor for ACE.

The following is an overview discussion of regulations for our operations in Switzerland, the U.S., Bermuda, and other international locations.

15

Table of Contents


Swiss Operations
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, which we refer to as “FINMA”, has the discretion to supervise ACE on a group-wide basis. However, FINMA issued a letter to us in January 2013 acknowledging the Department's assumption of group supervision over us.

In 2008, we formed ACE Insurance (Switzerland) Limited which offers various insurance covers to small and mid-sized Swiss companies, as well as A&H solutions to individuals. We have also formed a reinsurance subsidiary named ACE Reinsurance (Switzerland) Limited, which we operate as primarily a provider of reinsurance to other ACE entities. Both companies are licensed and governed by FINMA.

U.S. Operations
Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the states in which they do business. The laws of the various states establish departments of insurance with broad authority to regulate, among other things: the standards of solvency that must be met and maintained, the licensing of insurers and their producers, approval of policy forms and rates, the nature of and limitations on investments, restrictions on the size of the risks which may be insured under a single policy, deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders, requirements for the acceptability of reinsurers, periodic examinations of the affairs of insurance companies, the form and content of reports of financial condition required to be filed, and the adequacy of reserves for unearned premiums, losses, and other purposes.

Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are required to file detailed annual and quarterly reports with state insurance regulators. In addition, our U.S. insurance subsidiaries' operations and financial records are subject to examination at regular intervals by state regulators.
  
All states have enacted legislation that regulates insurance holding companies. This legislation provides that each insurance company in the system is required to register with the insurance department of its state of domicile and furnish information concerning the operations of companies within the holding company system that may materially affect the operations, management, or financial condition of the insurers within the system. All transactions within a holding company system must be fair and equitable. Notice to the insurance departments is required prior to the consummation of transactions affecting the ownership or control of an insurer and of certain material transactions between an insurer and an entity in its holding company system. In addition, certain transactions may not be consummated without the department's prior approval.

Statutory surplus is an important measure used by the regulators and rating agencies to assess our U.S. insurance subsidiaries' ability to support business operations and provide dividend capacity. Our U.S. insurance subsidiaries are subject to various state statutory and regulatory restrictions that limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval from regulatory authorities. These restrictions differ by state, but are generally based on calculations incorporating statutory surplus, statutory net income, and/or investment income.

The NAIC has a risk-based capital requirement for P&C insurance companies. This risk-based capital formula is used by many state regulatory authorities to identify insurance companies that may be undercapitalized and which merit further regulatory attention. These requirements are designed to monitor capital adequacy using a formula that prescribes a series of risk measurements to determine a minimum capital amount for an insurance company, based on the profile of the individual company. The ratio of a company's actual policyholder surplus to its minimum capital requirement will determine whether any state regulatory action is required. There are progressive risk-based capital failure levels that trigger more stringent regulatory action. If an insurer's policyholders' surplus falls below the Mandatory Control Level (70 percent of the Authorized Control Level, as defined by the NAIC), the relevant insurance commissioner is required to place the insurer under regulatory control. However, an insurance commissioner may allow a P&C company operating below the Mandatory Control Level that is writing no business and is running off its existing business to continue its run-off. Brandywine is running off its liabilities consistent with the terms of an order issued by the Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania. This includes periodic reporting obligations to the Department.

Government intervention has also occurred in the insurance and reinsurance markets in relation to terrorism coverage in the U.S. (and through industry initiatives in other countries). The U.S. Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), which was enacted in 2002 to ensure the availability of insurance coverage for certain types of terrorist acts in the U.S., was extended in 2007 for seven years, through 2014, and applies to certain of our operations.


16

Table of Contents

From time to time, ACE and its subsidiaries and affiliates receive inquiries from state agencies and attorneys general, with which we generally comply, seeking information concerning business practices, such as underwriting and non-traditional or loss mitigation insurance products. Moreover, many recent factors, such as consequences of and reactions to industry and economic conditions and focus on domestic issues, have contributed to the potential for change in the legal and regulatory framework applicable to ACE's U.S. operations and businesses. We cannot assure that changes in laws or investigative or enforcement activities in the various states in the U.S. will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or business practices. More information on insurance industry investigations, including settlement agreements and related matters, is set forth in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under Item 8.

Bermuda Operations
The Insurance Act 1978 of Bermuda and related regulations, as amended (the Insurance Act), regulates the insurance business of our Bermuda insurance subsidiaries and provides that no person may carry on any insurance business in or from within Bermuda unless registered as an insurer by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA). The Insurance Act makes no distinction between insurance and reinsurance business. The Insurance Act imposes solvency and liquidity standards and auditing and reporting requirements on Bermuda insurance companies and grants the BMA powers to supervise, investigate, and intervene in the affairs of insurance companies.

In 2008, the Bermuda insurance supervisory framework underwent major revision with the passage of the Insurance Amendment Act 2008 (the Amendment Act). The Amendment Act established new risk-based regulatory capital adequacy and solvency margin requirements for Bermuda insurers.

Our Bermuda domiciled insurance subsidiaries must prepare annual statutory financial statements and file them with the BMA, and certain subsidiaries must file audited annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP), International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), or any such other generally accepted accounting principles as the BMA may recognize. These audited financials are made public by the BMA. The Insurance Act prescribes rules for the preparation and content of the statutory financial statements and are distinct from the financial statements prepared for presentation to an insurer's shareholders under the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda (the Companies Act). These ACE subsidiaries are required to give detailed information and analyses regarding premiums, claims, reinsurance and investments.

Under the new regulatory framework, the BMA has promulgated the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Class 4 Solvency Requirement) Order 2008 (the Order) which, inter alia , mandates that a Class 4 insurer's Enhanced Capital Requirement (ECR) be calculated by either (a) the model set out in Schedule 1 to the Order, or (b) an internal capital model which the BMA has approved for use for this purpose. ACE's Bermuda Class 4 insurance subsidiaries use the BMA model in calculating their solvency requirements.

During 2011, the BMA also issued the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Class 4 and Class 3B Solvency Requirement) Amendment Rules 2011, Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Class E Solvency Requirement) Rules 2011 and the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Class 3A Solvency Requirement) Rules 2011.

The Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Class 4 and Class 3B Solvency Requirement) Amendment Rules 2011 amends the Order for Class 4 companies issued in 2008. The Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Class E Solvency Requirement) Rules 2011 and the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Class 3A Solvency Requirement) Rules 2011 require that as of December 31, 2011, Class E (long term business) companies and Class 3A (general business) companies follow similar rules as those set out above for Class 4 companies.

The new risk-based regulatory capital adequacy and solvency margin regime provides a risk-based capital model (termed the Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement (BSCR)) as a tool to assist the BMA both in measuring risk and in determining appropriate levels of capitalization. The BSCR employs a standard mathematical model that correlates the risk underwritten by Bermuda insurers to the capital that is dedicated to their business. The framework that has been developed applies a standard measurement format to the risk associated with an insurer's assets, liabilities, and premiums, including a formula to take account of catastrophe risk exposure. In order to minimize the risk of a shortfall in capital arising from an unexpected adverse deviation and in moving towards the implementation of a risk based capital approach, the BMA requires that insurers operate at or above a threshold capital level (termed the Target Capital Level (TCL)), which exceeds the BSCR or approved internal model minimum amounts.


17

Table of Contents

These capital requirements require that Class 4, 3B and 3A insurers hold available statutory capital and surplus equal to or exceeding ECR and set TCL at 120 percent of ECR. The BMA also has a degree of discretion enabling it to impose ECR on insurers in particular cases, for instance where an insurer falls below the TCL. While they must calculate its ECR annually by reference to either the BSCR or an approved internal model, Class 4 and 3B insurers must also ensure that, at all times, its ECR is at least equal to minimum solvency margins as prescribed on the regulations. Similar rules now apply to Class E and 3A long term insurers, but they are being phased in over three years.

Under the Insurance Act, Class 4, 3B and 3A insurers are prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends of more than 25 percent of its total statutory capital and surplus, as shown in its previous financial year statutory balance sheet, unless at least seven days before payment of the dividends, it files with the BMA an affidavit that it will continue to meet its required solvency margins. In addition, Class 4, 3B and E insurers must obtain the BMA's prior approval before reducing its total statutory capital, as shown in its previous financial year statutory balance sheet, by 15 percent or more. Furthermore, under the Companies Act, the Bermuda insurance subsidiaries may only declare and pay a dividend from retained earnings, and a dividend or distribution from contributed surplus if it has no reasonable grounds for believing that it is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due, or if the realizable value of its assets would not be less than the aggregate of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium accounts.

Other International Operations
The extent of insurance regulation varies significantly among the countries in which the non-U.S. ACE operations conduct business. While each country imposes licensing, solvency, auditing, and financial reporting requirements, the type and extent of the requirements differ substantially. For example:

in some countries, insurers are required to prepare and file quarterly financial reports, and in others, only annual reports;
some regulators require intermediaries to be involved in the sale of insurance products, whereas other regulators permit direct sales contact between the insurer and the customer;
the extent of restrictions imposed upon an insurer's use of local and offshore reinsurance vary;
policy form filing and rate regulation vary by country;
the frequency of contact and periodic on-site examinations by insurance authorities differ by country; and
regulatory requirements relating to insurer dividend policies vary by country.

Significant variations can also be found in the size, structure, and resources of the local regulatory departments that oversee insurance activities. Certain regulators prefer close relationships with all subject insurers and others operate a risk-based approach.

ACE operates in some countries through subsidiaries and in some countries through branches of subsidiaries. Local capital requirements applicable to a subsidiary generally include its branches. Certain ACE companies are jointly owned with local companies to comply with legal requirements for local ownership. Other legal requirements include discretionary licensing procedures, compulsory cessions of reinsurance, local retention of funds and records, data privacy and protection program requirements, and foreign exchange controls. ACE's international companies are also subject to multinational application of certain U.S. laws.

There are various regulatory bodies and initiatives that impact ACE in multiple international jurisdictions and the potential for significant impact on ACE could be heightened as a result of recent industry and economic developments. In particular, the European Union's (EU) executive body, the European Commission, is implementing new capital adequacy and risk management regulations for the European insurance industry, known as Solvency II, which aims to establish a revised set of EU-wide capital requirements and risk management standards that will replace the current Solvency I requirements. The Solvency II requirements are expected to be effective January 1, 2016.

Under Solvency II, it is possible that a U.S. domiciled parent company of a subsidiary domiciled in the EU could be subject to certain requirements if determined by the regulator that its subsidiary's capital position is dependent on the U.S. parent company that is not subject to requirements deemed to be ''equivalent'' to Solvency II. While it is not certain how or if these actions will impact ACE, we do not currently expect that our capital management strategies, results of operations and financial condition will be materially affected by the Solvency II requirements.

18

Table of Contents


____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Enterprise Risk Management
As an insurer, ACE is in the business of profitably managing risk for its customers. Since risk management must permeate an organization conducting a global insurance business, we have an established Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework that is integrated into management of our businesses and is led by ACE's senior management. As a result, ERM is a part of the day-to-day management of ACE and its operations.
Our global ERM framework is broadly multi-disciplinary and its objectives include:

support core risk management responsibilities at division and corporate levels through the identification and management of risks that aggregate and/or correlate across divisions;
identify, analyze, and mitigate significant external risks that could impair the financial condition of ACE and/or hinder its business objectives;
coordinate accumulation guidelines and actual exposure relative to guidelines, risk codes, and other risk processes;
provide analysis and maintain accumulation and economic capital and information systems that enable business leaders to make appropriate and consistent risk/return decisions;
identify and assess emerging risk issues; and
develop and communicate to our business lines consistent risk management processes.

ACE's Enterprise Risk Management Board (ERMB) reports to and assists the Chief Executive Officer in the oversight and review of the ERM framework which covers the processes and guidelines used to manage insurance risk, financial risk, strategic risk, and operational risk. The ERMB is chaired by ACE's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary. The ERMB meets at least monthly, and is comprised of ACE's most senior executives, in addition to the Chair, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Claims Officer, General Counsel, Chairman for Insurance – North America, Chairman for ACE Overseas General, and our Chairman for Global Reinsurance.

Various sources, including the Enterprise Risk Unit (ERU) and Product Boards, provide support to the ERMB. The ERU is responsible for the collation and analysis of two types of information. First, external information that provides insight to the ERMB on risks that might significantly impact ACE's key objectives and second, internal risk aggregations from its business writings and other activities such as investments. The ERU is independent of the operating units and reports to our Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary. The Product Boards exist to provide oversight for products that we offer globally. A Product Board currently exists for each of the following products; property/energy, marine, casualty, professional lines, aviation, and political risk. Each Product Board is responsible for ensuring consistency in underwriting and pricing standards, identification of emerging issues, and guidelines for relevant accumulations.

ACE's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary also reports to the Board's Risk & Finance Committee, which helps execute the Board's supervisory responsibilities pertaining to ERM. The role of the Risk & Finance Committee includes evaluation of the integrity and effectiveness of our ERM procedures, systems, and information; governance on major policy decisions pertaining to risk aggregation and minimization; and assessment of our major decisions and preparedness levels pertaining to perceived material risks. The Audit Committee meets annually and on an as needed basis with the Risk & Finance Committee in order to exercise its duties under New York Stock Exchange Rules.
Others within the ERM structure contribute toward accomplishing ACE's ERM objectives, including regional management, Internal Audit, Compliance, external consultants, and managers of our internal control processes and procedures.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Tax Matters
Refer to “Risk Factors”, under Item 1A and Note 1 n ) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Factors that could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition are outlined below. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem insignificant may also impair our business or results of operations as they become known facts or as facts and circumstances change. Any of the risks described below could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.


19

Table of Contents

Business

U.S. and global economic and financial industry events and their consequences could harm our business, our liquidity and financial condition, and our stock price.
The consequences of adverse global market and economic conditions may affect (among other aspects of our business) the demand for and claims made under our products, the ability of customers, counterparties, and others to establish or maintain their relationships with us, our ability to access and efficiently use internal and external capital resources, the availability of reinsurance protection, the risks we assume under reinsurance programs covering variable annuity guarantees, and our investment performance.  Volatility in the U.S. and other securities markets may adversely affect our stock price.

Our results of operations or financial condition could be adversely affected by the occurrence of natural and man-made disasters.
We have substantial exposure to losses resulting from natural disasters, man-made catastrophes, and other catastrophic events. This could impact a variety of our businesses, including both commercial and personal lines products. Catastrophes can be caused by various events, including hurricanes, typhoons, earthquakes, hailstorms, drought, explosions, severe winter weather, fires, war, acts of terrorism, nuclear accidents, political instability, and other natural or man-made disasters, including a global or other wide-impact pandemic. The incidence and severity of catastrophes are inherently unpredictable and our losses from catastrophes could be substantial. In addition, climate conditions may be changing, primarily through changes in global temperatures, which may increase the frequency and severity of natural catastrophes and the resulting losses in the future. We cannot predict the impact that changing climate conditions, if any, may have on our results of operations or our financial condition. Additionally, we cannot predict how legal, regulatory and/or social responses to concerns around global climate change may impact our business. The occurrence of claims from catastrophic events could result in substantial volatility in our results of operations or financial condition for any fiscal quarter or year. Increases in the values and concentrations of insured property may also increase the severity of these occurrences in the future. Although we attempt to manage our exposure to such events through the use of underwriting controls and the purchase of third-party reinsurance, catastrophic events are inherently unpredictable and the actual nature of such events when they occur could be more frequent or severe than contemplated in our pricing and risk management expectations. As a result, the occurrence of one or more catastrophic events could have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

If actual claims exceed our loss reserves, our financial results could be adversely affected.
Our results of operations and financial condition depend upon our ability to accurately assess the potential losses associated with the risks that we insure and reinsure. We establish reserves for unpaid losses and loss expenses, which are estimates of future payments of reported and unreported claims for losses and related expenses, with respect to insured events that have occurred at or prior to the date of the balance sheet. The process of establishing reserves can be highly complex and is subject to considerable variability as it requires the use of informed estimates and judgments.

We have actuarial staff in each of our segments who analyze insurance reserves and regularly evaluate the levels of loss reserves. Any such evaluations could result in future changes in estimates of losses or reinsurance recoverables and would be reflected in our results of operations in the period in which the estimates are changed. Losses and loss expenses are charged to income as incurred. Reserves for unpaid losses and loss expenses represent the estimated ultimate losses and loss expenses less paid losses and loss expenses, and comprise case reserves and IBNR. During the loss settlement period, which can be many years in duration for some of our lines of business, additional facts regarding individual claims and trends often will become known. As these become apparent, case reserves may be adjusted by allocation from IBNR with or without any change in overall reserves. In addition, application of statistical and actuarial methods may require the adjustment of overall reserves upward or downward from time to time.

Included in our liabilities for losses and loss expenses are liabilities for latent claims such as A&E. At December 31, 2012 , these A&E liabilities represented approximately 5.4 percent of our liabilities for losses and loss expenses. These claims are principally related to claims arising from remediation costs associated with hazardous waste sites and bodily-injury claims related to exposure to asbestos products and environmental hazards. The estimation of these liabilities is subject to many complex variables including: the current legal environment; specific settlements that may be used as precedents to settle future claims; assumptions regarding trends with respect to claim severity and the frequency of higher severity claims; assumptions regarding the ability to allocate liability among defendants (including bankruptcy trusts) and other insurers; the ability of a claimant to bring a claim in a state in which they have no residency or exposure; the ability of a policyholder to claim the right to non-products coverage; whether high-level excess policies have the potential to be accessed given the policyholder's claim trends and liability situation; payments to unimpaired claimants; and, the potential liability of peripheral defendants.


20

Table of Contents

Accordingly, the ultimate settlement of losses, arising from either latent or non-latent causes (e.g., greater than anticipated inflation), may be significantly greater or less than the loss and loss expense reserves held at the date of the balance sheet. If our loss reserves are determined to be inadequate, we will be required to increase loss reserves at the time of such determination and our net income will be reduced. If the increase in loss reserves is large enough, we could incur a net loss and a net reduction of our capital.

The effects of emerging claim and coverage issues on our business are uncertain.
As industry practices and legislative, regulatory, judicial, social, financial, and other environmental conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. These issues may adversely affect our business by either extending coverage beyond our underwriting intent or by increasing the frequency and severity of claims. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until some time after we have issued insurance or reinsurance contracts that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our insurance or reinsurance contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued.

The failure of any of the loss limitation methods we employ could have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
We seek to manage our loss exposure by maintaining a disciplined underwriting process throughout our insurance operations. We also look to limit our loss exposure by writing a number of our insurance and reinsurance contracts on an excess of loss basis. Excess of loss insurance and reinsurance indemnifies the insured against losses in excess of a specified amount. In addition, we limit program size for each client and purchase third-party reinsurance for our own account. In the case of our assumed proportional reinsurance treaties, we seek per occurrence limitations or loss and loss expense ratio caps to limit the impact of losses ceded by the client. In proportional reinsurance, the reinsurer shares a proportional part of the premiums and losses of the reinsured. We also seek to limit our loss exposure by geographic diversification. Geographic zone limitations involve significant underwriting judgments, including the determination of the area of the zones and the inclusion of a particular policy within a particular zone's limits. Various provisions of our policies, such as limitations or exclusions from coverage or choice of forum negotiated to limit our risks, may not be enforceable in the manner we intend. As a result, one or more catastrophic or other events could result in claims that substantially exceed our expectations, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

We may be unable to purchase reinsurance, and if we successfully purchase reinsurance, we are subject to the possibility of non-payment.
We purchase reinsurance to protect against catastrophes, to increase the amount of protection we can provide our clients, and as part of our overall risk management strategy.   Our reinsurance business also purchases some retrocessional protection.  A retrocessional reinsurance agreement allows a reinsurer to cede to another company all or part of the reinsurance that was originally assumed by the reinsurer. A reinsurer's or retrocessionaire's insolvency or inability or unwillingness to make timely payments under the terms of its reinsurance agreement with us could have an adverse effect on us because we remain liable to the insured. From time to time, market conditions have limited, and in some cases have prevented, insurers and reinsurers from obtaining the types and amounts of reinsurance or retrocessional reinsurance that they consider adequate for their business needs.

There is no guarantee our desired amounts of reinsurance or retrocessional reinsurance will be available in the marketplace in the future. In addition to capacity risk, the remaining capacity may not be on terms we deem appropriate or acceptable or with companies with whom we want to do business.  Finally, we face some degree of counterparty risk whenever we purchase reinsurance or retrocessional reinsurance. Consequently, the insolvency, inability, or unwillingness of any of our present or future reinsurers to make timely payments to us under the terms of our reinsurance or retrocessional agreements could have an adverse effect on us. At December 31, 2012 , we had $ 12.1 billion of reinsurance recoverables, net of reserves for uncollectible recoverables.

Certain of our subsidiaries are liable for A&E and other exposures they have reinsured to our inactive run-off company Century Indemnity Company (Century). At December 31, 2012 , the aggregate reinsurance balances ceded by our active subsidiaries to Century were approximately $958 million . Should Century's loss reserves experience adverse development in the future and should Century be placed into rehabilitation or liquidation, the reinsurance recoverables due from Century to its affiliates would be payable only after the payment in full of certain expenses and liabilities, including administrative expenses and direct policy liabilities. Thus, the intercompany reinsurance recoverables would be at risk to the extent of the shortage of assets remaining to pay these recoverables. While we believe the intercompany reinsurance recoverables from Century are not impaired at this time, we cannot assure that adverse development with respect to Century's loss reserves, if manifested, will not result in Century's

21

Table of Contents

insolvency, which could result in our recognizing a loss to the extent of any uncollectible reinsurance from Century. This could have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Our net income may be volatile because certain products sold by our Life business expose us to reserve and fair value liability changes that are directly affected by market and other factors and assumptions.
Our pricing, establishment of reserves for future policy benefits and valuation of life insurance and annuity products, including reinsurance programs, are based upon various assumptions, including but not limited to market changes, mortality rates, morbidity rates, and policyholder behavior.  The process of establishing reserves for future policy benefits relies on our ability to accurately estimate insured events that have not yet occurred but that are expected to occur in future periods.  Significant deviations in actual experience from assumptions used for pricing and for reserves for future policy benefits could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our products and our business.

Under reinsurance programs covering variable annuity guarantees, we assumed the risk of guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB) and guaranteed living benefits (GLB) associated with variable annuity contracts. We ceased writing this business in 2007. Our net income is directly impacted by changes in the reserves calculated in connection with the reinsurance of GMDB and GLB liabilities. In addition, our net income is directly impacted by the change in the fair value of the GLB liability. Reported liabilities for both GMDB and GLB reinsurance are determined using internal valuation models. Such valuations require considerable judgment and are subject to significant uncertainty. The valuation of these products is subject to fluctuations arising from, among other factors, changes in interest rates, changes in equity markets, changes in credit markets, changes in the allocation of the investments underlying annuitant's account values, and assumptions regarding future policyholder behavior. Significant changes in behavior as a result of policyholder reactions to market or economic conditions could be material. We view our variable annuity reinsurance business as having a similar risk profile to that of catastrophe reinsurance, with the probability of long-term economic loss relatively small at the time of pricing. Adverse changes in market factors and policyholder behavior will have an impact on both life underwriting income and net income. When evaluating these risks, we expect to be compensated for taking both the risk of a cumulative long-term economic net loss, as well as the short-term accounting variations caused by these market movements. Therefore, we evaluate this business in terms of its long-term economic risk and reward. Refer to the “Critical Accounting Estimates - Guaranteed living benefits (GLB) derivatives”, under Item 7 and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk - Reinsurance of GLB and GMDB guarantees”, under Item 7A for additional information.

A failure in our operational systems or infrastructure or those of third parties could disrupt business, damage our reputation, and cause losses.
Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information , including in our computer systems and networks. Our business depends on effective information security and systems and the integrity and timeliness of the data our information systems use to run our business. Our ability to adequately price products and services, to establish reserves, to provide effective, efficient and secure service to our customers, to value our investments and to timely and accurately report our financial results also depends significantly on the integrity of the data we maintain, including that within our information systems, as well as data in third party service provider systems. Although we have implemented administrative and technical controls and take protective actions to reduce the risk of cyber incidents and protect our information technology, and we endeavor to modify such procedures as circumstances warrant, such measures may be insufficient to prevent unauthorized access, computer viruses, malware or other malicious code or cyber-attack, catastrophic events, system failures and disruptions and other events that could have security consequences (each a “Security Event”). Like other global companies, we have, from time to time, experienced Security Events, none of which had a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition. If additional Security Events occur, these events may jeopardize ACE's or its clients' or counterparties' confidential and other information processed and stored within ACE, and transmitted through its computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in ACE's, its clients', its counterparties', or third parties' operations, or result in data loss which could result in significant losses or reputational damage. ACE may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered by insurance maintained.

Despite the contingency plans and facilities we have in place, our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by a disruption of the infrastructure that supports our business in the communities in which we are located, or of outsourced services or functions. This may include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation, or other services used by ACE. These disruptions may occur, for example, as a result of events that affect only the buildings occupied by ACE or as a result of events with a broader effect on the cities where those buildings are located. If a disruption occurs in one location and ACE employees in that location are unable to occupy our offices and conduct business or communicate with or travel to other locations, our ability

22

Table of Contents

to service and interact with clients may suffer and we may not be able to successfully implement contingency plans that depend on communication or travel.

Employee error and misconduct may be difficult to detect and prevent and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Losses may result from, among other things, fraud, errors, failure to document and secure transactions properly, failure to obtain proper internal authorization, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements. It is not always possible to deter or prevent employee misconduct and the precautions ACE takes to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Resultant losses could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We have exposure to counterparties in various industries which may subject us to credit risk.
We have exposure to counterparties through reinsurance and in various industries, including banks, hedge funds and other investment vehicles, and derivative transactions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event our counterparty fails to perform its obligations. Even if we are entitled to collateral when a counterparty defaults, such collateral may be illiquid or proceeds from such collateral when liquidated may not be sufficient to recover the full amount of the obligation. We also have exposure to financial institutions in the form of secured and unsecured debt instruments and equity securities.

The integration of acquired companies may not be as successful as we anticipate.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including operational, strategic, financial, accounting, legal and tax risks such as potential liabilities associated with the acquired business. Difficulties in integrating an acquired company may result in the acquired company performing differently than we expected or in our failure to realize anticipated expense-related efficiencies. Our existing businesses could also be negatively impacted by acquisitions. In addition, goodwill and intangible assets recorded in connection with insurance company acquisitions may be impaired if premium growth, underwriting profitability, agency retention and policy persistency, among other factors, differ from expectations.

There is also the potential that proposed acquisitions that have been publicly announced will not be consummated, even if a definitive agreement has been signed by the parties. If an agreement is terminated before closing, the result would be that our proposed acquisition would not occur, which could, among other things, expose us to damages or liability and adversely impact our stock price and future operations. 

We utilize analytical models to assist our decision making in key areas such as underwriting, reserving, and catastrophe risks but actual results could differ materially from the model outputs.
We employ various modeling techniques (e.g., scenarios, predictive, stochastic and/or forecasting) to analyze and estimate exposures, loss trends and other risks associated with our assets and liabilities. We utilize the modeled outputs and related analyses to assist us in decision-making, for example related to underwriting, pricing, reserving, reinsurance, and catastrophe risk. The modeled outputs and related analyses are subject to various assumptions, uncertainties, and the inherent limitations of any statistical analysis, including the use of historical internal and industry data. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from our modeled results. If, based upon these models or other factors, we misprice our products or underestimate the frequency and/or severity of loss events, our results of operations or financial condition may be adversely affected. If, based upon these models or other factors, we misprice our products or overestimate the risks we are exposed to, new business growth and retention of our existing business may be adversely affected which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
 
Financial Strength and Debt Ratings

A decline in our financial strength ratings could affect our standing among brokers and customers and cause our premiums and earnings to decrease. A decline in our debt ratings could increase our borrowing costs and impact our ability to access capital markets.    
Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance and reinsurance companies. The objective of these rating systems is to provide an opinion of an insurer's financial strength and ability to meet ongoing obligations to its policyholders. Our financial strength ratings reflect the rating agencies' opinions of our claims paying ability, are not evaluations directed to investors in our securities, and are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold our securities. If our financial strength ratings are reduced from their current levels by one or more of these rating agencies, our competitive position in the insurance industry could suffer and it would be more difficult for us to market our products. A downgrade, therefore, could result in a substantial loss of business as insureds, ceding companies, and brokers move to other insurers and reinsurers with higher ratings. If one or more of our debt ratings were downgraded, we could also incur higher borrowing costs, and our ability to

23

Table of Contents

access the capital markets could be impacted. Additionally, we could be required to post collateral or be faced with the cancellation of policies and resulting premium in certain circumstances. Refer to “Ratings”, under Item 7 for additional information.

We cannot give any assurance regarding whether or to what extent any of the rating agencies may downgrade our ratings in the future.

Loss of Key Executives

We could be adversely affected by the loss of one or more key executives or by an inability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
Our success depends on our ability to retain the services of our existing key executives and to attract and retain additional qualified personnel in the future. The loss of the services of any of our key executives or the inability to hire and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future could adversely affect our ability to conduct or grow our business. This risk may be particularly acute for us relative to some of our competitors because some of our senior executives work in countries where they are not citizens and work permit and immigration issues could adversely affect the ability to retain or hire key persons. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies with respect to our employees.

Brokers and Customers

Since we depend on a few brokers for a large portion of our revenues, loss of business provided by any one of them could adversely affect us.
We market our insurance and reinsurance worldwide primarily through insurance and reinsurance brokers. Marsh, Inc. and its affiliates provided approximately 11 percent of our gross premiums written in 2012 . Loss of all or a substantial portion of the business provided by one or more of these brokers could have an adverse effect on our business.

Our reliance on brokers subjects us to credit risk.
In accordance with industry practice, we generally pay amounts owed on claims under our insurance and reinsurance contracts to brokers, and these brokers, in turn, pay these amounts over to the clients that have purchased insurance or reinsurance from us. Although the law is unsettled and depends upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case, in some jurisdictions, if a broker fails to make such a payment, we might remain liable to the insured or ceding insurer for the deficiency. Conversely, in certain jurisdictions, when the insured or ceding insurer pays premiums for these policies to brokers for payment over to us, these premiums might be considered to have been paid and the insured or ceding insurer will no longer be liable to us for those amounts, whether or not we have actually received the premiums from the broker. Consequently, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with brokers with whom we transact business. However, due to the unsettled and fact-specific nature of the law, we are unable to quantify our exposure to this risk. To date, we have not experienced any material losses related to these credit risks.

Certain of our policies subject us to credit risk from customers.
We offer high-deductible policies which are provided in such lines of business as workers' compensation, general liability and commercial auto liability; and we also offer fully fronted, matching deductible coverages. Under the terms of these policies, our customers are responsible to reimburse us for an agreed-upon dollar amount per claim and/or an aggregate amount for all covered claims. In nearly all cases we are required under such policies to pay covered claims first, sometimes directly to third-party claimants, and then seek reimbursement for amounts within the applicable deductible from our customers. This obligation subjects us to credit risk from these customers. While we generally seek to mitigate this risk through collateral agreements and maintain a provision for uncollectible accounts associated with this credit exposure, an increased inability of customers to reimburse us in this context could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a lack of credit available to our customers could impact our ability to collateralize this risk to our satisfaction, which in turn, could reduce the amount of high-deductible policies we could offer.

Liquidity and Investments

Our investment performance may affect our financial results and ability to conduct business.
Our funds are invested by professional investment management firms under the direction of our management team in accordance with investment guidelines approved by the Risk & Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. Although our investment guidelines stress diversification of risks and conservation of principal and liquidity, our investments are subject to market risks, as well as risks inherent in individual securities. The volatility of our losses may force us to liquidate securities,

24

Table of Contents

which may cause us to incur capital losses. Realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio would generally reduce our book value, and if significant, can affect our ability to conduct business. We experienced $1.3 billion of pre-tax realized and unrealized gains on our investment portfolio in 2012 . The carrying value of our investment portfolio was $60.3 billion at December 31, 2012 .

Financial markets events create greater risks relating to impairment of investments.
As a part of our ongoing analysis of our investment portfolio, we are required to assess whether the debt and equity securities we hold for which we have recorded an unrealized loss have been “other-than-temporarily impaired” under GAAP, which implies an inability to recover the full economic benefits of these securities. Refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. This analysis requires a high degree of judgment and requires us to make certain assessments about the potential for recovery of the assets we hold. Declines in relevant stock and other financial markets, and other factors impacting the value of our investments, could result in impairments from time to time, and could adversely affect our net income and other financial results.

We may be adversely affected by interest rate changes.
Our operating results are affected by the performance of our investment portfolio. Our investment portfolio contains primarily fixed income investments and may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates. Volatility in interest rates could also have an adverse effect on our investment income and operating results. For example, if interest rates decline, funds reinvested will earn less than the maturing investment. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including inflation, monetary and fiscal policies, and domestic and international political conditions. Although we take measures to manage the risks of investing in a changing interest rate environment, we may not be able to effectively mitigate interest rate sensitivity. Our mitigation efforts include maintaining a high quality portfolio with a relatively short duration to reduce the effect of interest rate changes on book value. A significant increase in interest rates would generally have an adverse effect on our book value. Our life insurance investments typically focus on longer duration bonds to better match the obligations of this business.  For the life business, policyholder behavior may be influenced by changing interest rate conditions and require a rebalancing of duration to effectively manage our asset/liability position.

We may require additional capital or financing sources in the future, which may not be available or may be available only on unfavorable terms.
Our future capital and financing requirements depend on many factors, including our ability to write new business successfully and to establish premium rates and reserves at levels sufficient to cover losses, as well as our investment performance. We may need to raise additional funds through financings or access funds through existing or new credit facilities or through short-term reverse repurchase agreements. We also from time to time seek to refinance debt or credit as amounts become due or commitments expire. Any equity or debt financing or refinancing, if available at all, may be on terms that are not favorable to us. In the case of equity financings, dilution to our shareholders could result, and in any case, such securities may have rights, preferences, and privileges that are senior to those of our Common Shares.  Our access to funds under existing credit facilities is dependent on the ability of the banks that are parties to the facilities to meet their funding commitments. Also, consolidation in the banking industry could lead to increased reliance on and exposure to particular institutions.  If we cannot obtain adequate capital or sources of credit on favorable terms, or at all, we could be forced to utilize assets otherwise available for our business operations, and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected. It is possible that, in the future, one or more of the rating agencies may reduce our existing ratings. If one or more of our ratings were downgraded, we could incur higher borrowing costs and our ability to access the capital markets could be impacted.

We may be required to post additional collateral because of changes in our reinsurance liabilities to regulated insurance companies, or because of regulatory changes that affect our companies.
If our reinsurance liabilities increase, we may be required to post additional collateral for insurance company clients.  In addition, regulatory changes sometimes affect our obligations to post collateral.  The need to post this additional collateral, if significant enough, may require us to sell investments at a loss in order to provide securities of suitable credit quality or otherwise secure adequate capital at an unattractive cost.  This could adversely impact our net income and liquidity and capital resources.

Our investment portfolio includes below investment-grade securities that have a higher degree of credit or default risk which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our fixed income portfolio is primarily invested in high quality, investment-grade securities. However, we invest a smaller portion of the portfolio in below investment-grade securities. At December 31, 2012 , below investment-grade securities comprised approximately 14 percent of our fixed income portfolio. These securities, which pay a higher rate of interest, also have a higher degree of credit or default risk. These securities may also be less liquid in times of economic weakness or market

25

Table of Contents

disruptions. While we have put in place procedures to monitor the credit risk and liquidity of our invested assets, it is possible that, in periods of economic weakness (such as recession), we may experience default losses in our portfolio, which could adversely affect our net income and book value.

Exchange Rates

Our operating results and shareholders' equity may be adversely affected by currency fluctuations.
Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. In general, we match assets and liabilities in local currencies. Where possible, capital levels in local currencies are limited to satisfy minimum regulatory requirements and to support local insurance operations. The principal currencies creating foreign exchange risk are the British pound sterling, the euro, the yen, the Canadian dollar, and the Australian dollar. At December 31, 2012 , approximately 18.9 percent of our net assets were denominated in foreign currencies. We may experience losses resulting from fluctuations in the values of non-U.S. currencies, which could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Regulatory and Other Governmental Developments

The regulatory and political regimes under which we operate, and their volatility, could have an adverse effect on our business.
Our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries conduct business globally. Our businesses in each jurisdiction are subject to varying degrees of regulation and supervision. The laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled require, among other things, maintenance of minimum levels of statutory capital, surplus, and liquidity; various solvency standards; and periodic examinations of subsidiaries' financial condition. In some jurisdictions, laws and regulations also restrict payments of dividends and reductions of capital. Applicable statutes, regulations, and policies may also restrict the ability of these subsidiaries to write insurance and reinsurance policies, to make certain investments, and to distribute funds. The purpose of insurance laws and regulations generally is to protect insureds and policyholders and ceding insurance companies, not our shareholders. For example, some jurisdictions have enacted various consumer protection laws that make it more burdensome for insurance companies to sell policies and interact with customers in personal lines businesses. Also, governmental support of individual competitors can lead to increased pricing pressure and a distortion of market dynamics.
The insurance industry is affected by political, judicial, and legal developments that may create new and expanded regulations and theories of liability. The current economic climate and the recent financial crisis present additional uncertainties and risks relating to increased regulation and the potential for increased involvement of the U.S. and other governments in the financial services industry.
In July 2010, the U.S. enacted comprehensive financial reform legislation, known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), which creates a new regulatory regime for financial services companies. Pursuant to the legislation, a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) has been established to focus on systemic risk oversight and to develop federal policy on prudential aspects of international insurance matters. The FIO is conducting a study for submission to the U.S. Congress on how to modernize and improve insurance regulation in the U.S. While the impact to ACE of the establishment and activity of the FIO is not clear, it is possible that it could have an adverse effect on our business and operations. Moreover, various federal regulatory agencies have proposed and adopted regulations in furtherance of the Dodd-Frank Act provisions and these activities will continue for the foreseeable future, such as the proposed regulations issued by the Financial Stability Oversight Council to identify certain nonbank financial companies to be subject to supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. To the extent these or other requirements ultimately apply to us when adopted in final form, they could require us to change how we conduct and manage our business and could adversely affect us.  A recent proposed regulation to impose assessments on financial services companies does not, as currently drafted, apply to us, but it is still unclear how and to what extent these requirements might apply to us under final regulations and whether we would have to make material contributions if they were applicable.


26

Table of Contents

The European Union's (EU) executive body, the European Commission, is implementing new capital adequacy and risk management requirements called Solvency II that would apply to our businesses across the EU and are expected to be effective January 1, 2016. ACE businesses are also subject to the requirements of the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) whose regulations include Swiss Solvency Tests. The current requirements of the Swiss Solvency Tests are subject to revisions resulting from any future Solvency II equivalence requirements. In addition, regulators in countries where we have operations are working with the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (and in the U.S., with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners) to consider changes to insurance company supervision, including with respect to solvency requirements. While it is not certain how or if these actions will impact ACE, we do not currently expect that our capital management strategies, results of operations and financial condition will be materially affected by the Solvency II requirements.

In the event of, or even in the absence of, changes in applicable laws and regulations in particular jurisdictions, we may from time to time face more challenges, or changes in approach to oversight of our business, from our insurance or other regulators, including challenges resulting from the use of information technology that cannot be quickly adjusted to address new regulatory requirements.
We may not be able to comply fully with, or obtain appropriate exemptions from, applicable statutes and regulations and any changes thereto, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Failure to comply with or to obtain appropriate authorizations and/or exemptions under any applicable laws and regulations could result in restrictions on our ability to do business or undertake activities that are regulated in one or more of the jurisdictions in which we conduct business and could subject us to fines and other sanctions.

Our operations in developing nations expose us to political developments that could have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our international operations include operations in various developing nations. Both current and future foreign operations could be adversely affected by unfavorable political developments including law changes, tax changes, regulatory restrictions, government leadership changes and nationalization of our operations without compensation. Adverse actions in any one country could have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition depending on the magnitude of the events and our net financial exposure at that time in that country.

Company Structure

Our ability to pay dividends and to make payments on indebtedness may be constrained by our holding company structure.
ACE Limited is a holding company and does not have any significant operations or assets other than its ownership of the shares of its operating insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. Dividends and other permitted distributions from our insurance subsidiaries are our primary source of funds to meet ongoing cash requirements, including any future debt service payments and other expenses, and to pay dividends to our shareholders. Some of our insurance subsidiaries are subject to significant regulatory restrictions limiting their ability to declare and pay dividends. The inability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet our cash requirements at the holding company level could have an adverse effect on our operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders and/or meet our debt service obligations.

ACE Limited is a Swiss company; it may be difficult to enforce judgments against it or its directors and executive officers.
ACE Limited is incorporated pursuant to the laws of Switzerland. In addition, certain of our directors and officers reside outside the U.S. and all or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of such persons are located in jurisdictions outside the U.S. As such, it may be difficult or impossible to effect service of process within the U.S. upon those persons or to recover against us or them on judgments of U.S. courts, including judgments predicated upon civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.

ACE has been advised by its Swiss counsel that there is doubt as to whether the courts in Switzerland would enforce:

judgments of U.S. courts based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws obtained in actions against it or its directors and officers, who reside outside the U.S.; or
original actions brought in Switzerland against these persons or ACE predicated solely upon U.S. federal securities laws.

ACE has also been advised by its Swiss counsel that there is no treaty in effect between the U.S. and Switzerland providing for this enforcement and there are grounds upon which Swiss courts may not enforce judgments of U.S. courts. Some remedies

27

Table of Contents

available under the laws of U.S. jurisdictions, including some remedies available under the U.S. federal securities laws, would not be allowed in Swiss courts as contrary to that nation's public policy.

As a result of the increase in par value of our shares that occurred in connection with our redomestication from the Cayman Islands to Switzerland in July 2008, we have less flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital management than previously.

As of December 31, 2012 , the par value of our Common Shares is CHF 28.89 per share. Under Swiss law, we generally may not issue registered shares below their par value. In the event there is a need to raise common equity capital at a time when the trading price of our registered shares is below our par value, we will need to obtain approval of our shareholders to decrease the par value of our registered shares. We cannot assure that we would be able to obtain such shareholder approval. Furthermore, obtaining shareholder approval would require filing a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC and convening a meeting of shareholders which would delay any capital raising plans. Furthermore, any reduction in par value would decrease our ability to pay dividends as a repayment of share capital which is not subject to Swiss withholding tax. See “Taxation - Shareholders may be subject to Swiss withholding taxes on the payment of dividends” for additional information.

Insurance and Reinsurance Markets

Competition in the insurance and reinsurance markets could reduce our margins.
Insurance and reinsurance markets are highly competitive. We compete on an international and regional basis with major U.S., Bermuda, European, and other international insurers and reinsurers and with underwriting syndicates, some of which have greater financial, marketing, and management resources than we do. We also compete with new companies that continue to be formed to enter the insurance and reinsurance markets. In addition, capital market participants have created alternative products that are intended to compete with reinsurance products. Increased competition could result in fewer submissions, lower premium rates, and less favorable policy terms and conditions, which could reduce our profit margins and adversely impact our net income and book value.

Insurance and reinsurance markets are historically cyclical, and we expect to experience periods with excess underwriting capacity and unfavorable premium rates.
The insurance and reinsurance markets have historically been cyclical, characterized by periods of intense price competition due to excessive underwriting capacity as well as periods when shortages of capacity permitted favorable premium levels. An increase in premium levels is often offset by an increasing supply of insurance and reinsurance capacity, either by capital provided by new entrants or by the commitment of additional capital by existing insurers or reinsurers, which may cause prices to decrease. Any of these factors could lead to a significant reduction in premium rates, less favorable policy terms, and fewer submissions for our underwriting services. In addition to these considerations, changes in the frequency and severity of losses suffered by insureds and insurers may affect the cycles of the insurance and reinsurance markets significantly, as could periods of economic weakness (such as recession).

Charter Documents and Applicable Law

There are provisions in our charter documents that may reduce the voting rights of our Common Shares.
Our Articles of Association generally provide that shareholders have one vote for each Common Share held by them and are entitled to vote at all meetings of shareholders. However, the voting rights exercisable by a shareholder may be limited so that certain persons or groups are not deemed to hold 10 percent or more of the voting power conferred by our Common Shares. Moreover, these provisions could have the effect of reducing the voting power of some shareholders who would not otherwise be subject to the limitation by virtue of their direct share ownership. Our Board of Directors may refuse to register holders of shares as shareholders with voting rights based on certain grounds, including if the holder would, directly or indirectly, formally, constructively or beneficially own (as described in Articles 8 and 14 of our Articles of Association) or otherwise control voting rights with respect to 10 percent or more of the registered share capital recorded in the commercial register. In addition, the Board of Directors shall reject entry of holders of registered shares as shareholders with voting rights in the share register or shall decide on their deregistration when the acquirer or shareholder upon request does not expressly state that she/he has acquired or holds the shares in her/his own name and for her/his account.

Applicable laws may make it difficult to effect a change of control of our company.
Before a person can acquire control of a U.S. insurance company, prior written approval must be obtained from the insurance commissioner of the state where the domestic insurer is domiciled. Prior to granting approval of an application to acquire control of a domestic insurer, the state insurance commissioner will consider such factors as the financial strength of the

28

Table of Contents

applicant, the integrity and management of the applicant's Board of Directors and executive officers, the acquirer's plans for the future operations of the domestic insurer, and any anti-competitive results that may arise from the consummation of the acquisition of control. Generally, state statutes provide that control over a domestic insurer is presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with the power to vote, or holds proxies representing 10 percent or more of the voting securities of the domestic insurer. Because a person acquiring 10 percent or more of our Common Shares would indirectly control the same percentage of the stock of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries, the insurance change of control laws of various U.S. jurisdictions would likely apply to such a transaction. Laws of other jurisdictions in which one or more of our existing subsidiaries are, or a future subsidiary may be, organized or domiciled may contain similar restrictions on the acquisition of control of ACE.

While our Articles of Association limit the voting power of any shareholder to less than 10 percent, we cannot assure that the applicable regulatory body would agree that a shareholder who owned 10 percent or more of our Common Shares did not, because of the limitation on the voting power of such shares, control the applicable insurance subsidiary.

These laws may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter, or prevent a change of control of ACE, including transactions that some or all of our shareholders might consider to be desirable.

U.S. persons who own our Common Shares may have more difficulty in protecting their interests than U.S. persons who are shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
Swiss corporate law, which applies to us, differs in certain material respects from laws generally applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. These differences include the manner in which directors must disclose transactions in which they have an interest, the rights of shareholders to bring class action and derivative lawsuits, and the scope of indemnification available to directors and officers.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter and corporate documents could impede an attempt to replace our directors or to effect a change of control, which could diminish the value of our Common Shares.
Our Articles of Association contain provisions that may make it more difficult for shareholders to replace directors and could delay or prevent a change of control that a shareholder might consider favorable. These provisions include staggered terms for the Board of Directors and voting restrictions. These provisions may prevent a shareholder from receiving the benefit from any premium over the market price of our Common Shares offered by a bidder in a potential takeover. Even in the absence of an attempt to effect a change in management or a takeover attempt, these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our Common Shares if they are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.

Shareholder voting requirements under Swiss law may limit ACE's flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital management .
Swiss law allows our shareholders to authorize share capital which can be issued by the Board of Directors without shareholder approval but this authorization must be renewed by the shareholders every two years. Swiss law also does not provide as much flexibility in the various terms that can attach to different classes of stock as permitted in other jurisdictions. Swiss law also reserves for approval by shareholders many corporate actions over which the Board of Directors previously had authority. For example, dividends must be approved by shareholders. While we do not believe that Swiss law requirements relating to our capital management will have an adverse effect on ACE, we cannot assure that situations will not arise where such flexibility would have provided substantial benefits to our shareholders.

Taxation

Shareholders may be subject to Swiss withholding taxes on the payment of dividends.
Our dividends are generally subject to a Swiss federal withholding tax at a rate of 35 percent. The tax must be withheld from the gross distribution, and be paid to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration. A U.S. holder that qualifies for benefits under the Convention between the United States of America and the Swiss Confederation for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with Respect to Taxes on Income, (U.S.-Swiss Tax Treaty), may apply for a refund of the tax withheld in excess of the 15 percent treaty rate (or for a full refund in the case of qualifying retirement arrangements). Payment of a dividend in the form of a par value reduction or qualifying capital contribution reserves reduction is not subject to Swiss withholding tax. We have previously obtained shareholder approval  for  dividends  to be paid in the form of a reduction of our par value or qualifying capital contribution reserves and, subject to the requirements of our business and applicable law, we currently intend to continue to annually recommend to shareholders that they approve the payment of dividends in such form. We estimate we would be able to pay dividends in the form of a reduction of par value or qualifying contribution reserves capital, and thus exempt from Swiss withholding tax, for approximately 15-20 years following the 2008 redomestication of our holding company ACE Limited from

29

Table of Contents

the Cayman Islands to Switzerland. This range may vary depending upon changes in annual dividends, special dividends, fluctuations in U.S. dollar/Swiss franc exchange rates, changes in par value or qualifying capital contribution reserves or changes or new interpretations to Swiss tax law or regulations. In addition, we cannot assure that our shareholders will approve a reduction in par value or qualifying capital contributions reserves each year, that we will be able to meet the other legal requirements for a reduction in par value, or that Swiss withholding rules will not be changed in the future.

We may become subject to taxes in Bermuda after March 31, 2035, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and shareholder investment.
The Bermuda Minister of Finance, under the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966 of Bermuda, as amended, has given ACE Limited and its Bermuda insurance subsidiaries a written assurance that if any legislation is enacted in Bermuda that would impose tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain, or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of any such tax would not be applicable to those companies or any of their respective operations, shares, debentures, or other obligations until March 31, 2035, except insofar as such tax would apply to persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda or is payable by us in respect of real property owned or leased by us in Bermuda. We cannot be certain that we will not be subject to any Bermuda tax after March 31, 2035.

ACE Limited, our Bermuda-based management and holding company and our non-U.S. subsidiaries may become subject to U.S. tax, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and our shareholders' investments.
ACE Limited, ACE Group Management & Holdings Ltd. and our non-U.S. subsidiaries, including ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., and ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., operate in a manner so that none of these companies should be subject to U.S. tax (other than U.S. excise tax on insurance and reinsurance premium income attributable to insuring or reinsuring U.S. risks and U.S. withholding tax on some types of U.S. source investment income), because none of these companies should be treated as engaged in a trade or business within the U.S. However, because there is considerable uncertainty as to the activities that constitute being engaged in a trade or business within the U.S., we cannot be certain that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will not contend successfully that ACE Limited or its non-U.S. subsidiaries are engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. If ACE Limited or any of its non-U.S. subsidiaries were considered to be engaged in a trade or business in the U.S., such entity could be subject to U.S. corporate income and branch profits taxes on the portion of its earnings effectively connected to such U.S. business, in which case our results of operations and our shareholders' investments could be adversely affected.

Acquisition of 10 percent or more of ACE Limited's shares may result in taxation under the "controlled foreign corporation" (CFC) rules.
Under certain circumstances, a U.S. person who owns 10 percent or more of the voting power of a foreign corporation that is a CFC (a foreign corporation in which 10 percent U.S. shareholders own more than 50 percent of the voting power or value of the stock of a foreign corporation or more than 25 percent of a foreign insurance corporation) for an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during a taxable year must include in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes such "10 percent U.S. Shareholder's" pro rata share of the CFC's "subpart F income", even if the subpart F income is not distributed to such 10 percent U.S. Shareholder if such 10 percent U.S. Shareholder owns (directly or indirectly through foreign entities) any of our shares on the last day of our fiscal year. Subpart F income of a foreign insurance corporation typically includes foreign personal holding company income (such as interest, dividends, and other types of passive income), as well as insurance and reinsurance income (including underwriting and investment income) attributable to the insurance of risks situated outside the CFC's country of incorporation.

We believe that because of the dispersion of our share ownership, provisions in our organizational documents that limit voting power, and other factors, no U.S. person or U.S. partnership who acquires shares of ACE Limited directly or indirectly through one or more foreign entities should be required to include our subpart F income in income under the CFC rules of U.S. tax law. It is possible, however, that the IRS could challenge the effectiveness of these provisions and that a court could sustain such a challenge, in which case the investment could be adversely affected if 10 percent or more of ACE Limited's stock is owned.

U.S. persons who hold shares may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at ordinary income tax rates on their proportionate share of our Related Person Insurance Income (RPII).
If the RPII of any of our non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries (each a "Non-U.S. Insurance Subsidiary") were to equal or exceed 20 percent of that company's gross insurance income in any taxable year and direct or indirect insureds (and persons related to those insureds) own directly or indirectly through foreign entities 20 percent or more of the voting power or value of ACE Limited, then a U.S. person who owns any shares of ACE Limited (directly or indirectly through foreign entities) on the last day of the taxable year would be required to include in his or her income for U.S. federal income tax purposes such person's pro rata share of such company's RPII for the entire taxable year. This amount is determined as if such RPII were distributed proportionately only to U.S. persons at that date regardless of whether such income is distributed. In addition, any RPII that is

30

Table of Contents

includible in the income of a U.S. tax-exempt organization may be treated as unrelated business taxable income. We believe that the gross RPII of each Non-U.S. Insurance Subsidiary did not in prior years of operation and is not expected in the foreseeable future to equal or exceed 20 percent of each such company's gross insurance income. Likewise, we do not expect the direct or indirect insureds of each Non-U.S. Insurance Subsidiary (and persons related to such insureds) to directly or indirectly own 20 percent or more of either the voting power or value of our shares. However, we cannot be certain that this will be the case because some of the factors which determine the extent of RPII may be beyond our control. If these thresholds are met or exceeded by an affected U.S. person, their investment could be adversely affected.

U.S. persons who hold shares will be subject to adverse tax consequences if we are considered to be a Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If ACE Limited is considered a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. person who owns any shares of ACE Limited will be subject to adverse tax consequences, including subjecting the investor to a greater tax liability than might otherwise apply and subjecting the investor to tax on amounts in advance of when tax would otherwise be imposed, in which case his or her investment could be adversely affected. In addition, if ACE Limited were considered a PFIC, upon the death of any U.S. individual owning shares, such individual's heirs or estate would not be entitled to a "step-up" in the basis of the shares which might otherwise be available under U.S. federal income tax laws. We believe that we are not, have not been, and currently do not expect to become, a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We cannot assure, however, that we will not be deemed a PFIC by the IRS. If we were considered a PFIC, it could have adverse tax consequences for an investor that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation. There are currently no regulations regarding the application of the PFIC provisions to an insurance company. New regulations or pronouncements interpreting or clarifying these rules may be forthcoming. We cannot predict what impact, if any, such guidance would have on an investor that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation.

U.S. tax-exempt organizations who own our shares may recognize unrelated business taxable income.
A U.S. tax-exempt organization may recognize unrelated business taxable income if a portion of our insurance income is allocated to the organization. This generally would be the case if either we are a CFC and the tax-exempt shareholder is a 10 percent U.S. shareholder or there is RPII, certain exceptions do not apply, and the tax-exempt organization, directly or indirectly through foreign entities, owns any shares of ACE Limited. Although we do not believe that any U.S. persons or U.S. partnerships should be allocated such insurance income, we cannot be certain that this will be the case. Potential U.S. tax-exempt investors are advised to consult their tax advisors.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the European Union are considering measures that might encourage countries to increase our taxes.
A number of multilateral organizations, including the European Union and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) have, in recent years, expressed concern about some countries not participating in adequate tax information exchange arrangements and have threatened those that do not agree to cooperate with punitive sanctions by member countries. It is as yet unclear what these sanctions might be, which countries might adopt them, and when or if they might be imposed. We cannot assure, however, that the Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs) that have been or will be entered into by Switzerland and Bermuda will be sufficient to preclude all of the sanctions described above, which, if ultimately adopted, could adversely affect us or our shareholders.

Changes in U.S. federal income tax law could adversely affect an investment in our shares.
Legislation is periodically introduced in the U.S. Congress intended to eliminate some perceived tax advantages of companies (including insurance companies) that have legal domiciles outside the United States but have certain U.S. connections. For example, HR 3157 and S 1693 (which appear to mirror a tax proposal contained in the President's Fiscal Year 2012 and 2013 Budget) were introduced during the last (i.e., 112 th ) Congress and, if similar legislation were to be enacted, would effectively render cross border affiliate reinsurance by foreign-owned U.S. insurance/reinsurance companies uneconomical regardless of whether or not it is properly priced under the Internationally accepted arms-length standard. Such a law could have an adverse impact on us or our shareholders. It is possible that other legislative proposals could emerge in the future that could have an adverse impact on us or our shareholders.


ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
There are currently no unresolved SEC staff comments regarding our periodic or current reports.

31

Table of Contents


ITEM 2. Properties
We maintain office facilities around the world including in North America, Europe (including our principal executive offices in Switzerland), Bermuda, Latin America, Asia Pacific and the Far East. Most of our office facilities are leased, although we own major facilities in Hamilton, Bermuda and Philadelphia, U.S. Management considers its office facilities suitable and adequate for the current level of operations.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
The information required with respect to Item 3 is included in Note 10 e) to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Name
Age

Position
Evan G. Greenberg
58

Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
John W. Keogh
48

Vice Chairman, Chief Operating Officer; Chairman, ACE Overseas General
Philip V. Bancroft
53

Chief Financial Officer
Robert F. Cusumano
56

General Counsel and Secretary
John J. Lupica
47

Chairman, Insurance – North America; President, ACE USA
Evan G. Greenberg has been a director of ACE since August 2002. Mr. Greenberg was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in May 2007. Mr. Greenberg became a director of The Coca-Cola Company in February 2011. Mr. Greenberg was appointed to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of ACE in May 2004, and in June 2003, was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of ACE. Mr. Greenberg was appointed to the position of Chief Executive Officer of ACE Overseas General in April 2002. He joined ACE as Vice Chairman, ACE Limited, and Chief Executive Officer of ACE Tempest Re in November 2001. Prior to joining ACE, Mr. Greenberg was most recently President and Chief Operating Officer of American International Group (AIG), a position he held from 1997 until 2000.
John W. Keogh was appointed Chief Operating Officer of ACE Limited in July 2011 and Vice Chairman of ACE Limited and ACE Group Holdings in August 2010. Mr. Keogh joined ACE as Chief Executive Officer of ACE Overseas General in April 2006 and became Chairman of ACE Overseas General in August 2010. Prior to joining ACE, Mr. Keogh served as Senior Vice President, Domestic General Insurance of AIG, and President and Chief Executive Officer of National Union Fire Insurance Company, AIG's member company that specializes in D&O and fiduciary liability coverages. Mr. Keogh joined AIG in 1986. He served in a number of other senior positions there including as Executive Vice President of AIG's Domestic Brokerage Group and as President and Chief Operating Officer of AIG's Lexington Insurance Company unit.  
Philip V. Bancroft was appointed Chief Financial Officer of ACE in January 2002. For nearly twenty years, Mr. Bancroft worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Prior to joining ACE, he served as partner-in-charge of the New York Regional Insurance Practice. Mr. Bancroft had been a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 10 years.
Robert F. Cusumano was appointed General Counsel and Secretary of ACE in March 2005. Mr. Cusumano joined ACE from the international law firm of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, where he was a partner and a member of the firm's Litigation Department from 2003 to 2005. From 1990 to 2003, Mr. Cusumano was a partner with the law firm of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.
John J. Lupica was appointed Chairman, Insurance – North America, in July 2011. Mr. Lupica also serves as President of ACE USA, a position he has held since 2006. Mr. Lupica had been Chief Operating Officer, Insurance – North America, since 2010. Previously, he served as Division President of ACE Professional Risk and ACE USA Regional Operations. Mr. Lupica joined ACE USA as Executive Vice President of Professional Risk in 2000. Prior to joining ACE, he served as Senior Vice President for Munich-American Risk Partners, Inc. He also held various management positions at AIG.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Item not applicable.


32

Table of Contents

PART II


                                                                                                                                                                                    
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

Our Common Shares (known as Ordinary Shares previous to ACE's July 2008 redomestication to Switzerland), with a current par value of CHF 28.89 per share, have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since March 25, 1993.

Quarterly Stock Information
The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of our Common Shares per fiscal quarter, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape, and cash dividends on Common Shares for the periods indicated:
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends
 
Quarter Ending
 
High
 
Low
 
USD
 
CHF
 
High
 
Low
 
USD
 
CHF
 
March 31
 
$
74.21

 
$
68.98

 
$
0.59

(1)  
0.53
 
$
65.74

 
$
60.15

 
$
0.33

 
0.30
 
June 30
 
$
77.00

 
$
70.00

 
$
0.49

 
0.48
 
$
69.35

 
$
63.95

 
$
0.35

 
0.29
 
September 30
 
$
77.04

 
$
69.17

 
$
0.49

 
0.45
 
$
68.38

 
$
58.98

 
$
0.35

 
0.31
 
December 31
 
$
81.70

 
$
76.10

 
$
0.49


0.45
 
$
73.33

 
$
59.11

 
$
0.35

 
0.32
 
(1) On January 9, 2012, ACE's shareholders approved a dividend resolution that increased the quarterly dividend installments from $0.35 to $0.47 per share for the quarters ended December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012.  Due to the timing of the approval, the $0.12 per share increase related to the quarter ended December 31, 2011 installment is included in the quarter ended March 31, 2012 dividend amount.

We have paid dividends each quarter since we became a public company in 1993. Following ACE's redomestication to Switzerland in July 2008 through March 31, 2011, dividends were distributed by way of a par value reduction. Subsequent 2011 dividends were distributed from capital contribution reserves (Additional paid-in capital) through the transfer of dividends from Additional paid-in capital to Retained earnings under the method approved by our shareholders at the May 2011 annual general meeting. At our May 2012 annual general meeting, our shareholders approved a dividend for the following year, payable in four quarterly installments after the May 2012 annual general meeting in the form of a distribution by way of a par value reduction. We have determined this procedure is more appropriate for us at this time due to current Swiss law.

ACE Limited is a holding company whose principal sources of income are investment income and dividends from its operating subsidiaries. The ability of the operating subsidiaries to pay dividends to us and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders are each subject to legal and regulatory restrictions. The recommendation and payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon shareholder approval, profits and financial requirements of ACE and other factors, including legal restrictions on the payment of dividends and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. Refer to Item 1A and Item 7 for additional information.

The last reported sale price of the Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on February 14, 2013 was $86.44 .

The number of record holders of Common Shares as of February 14, 2013 was 4,164 . This is not the actual number of beneficial owners of ACE's Common Shares since most of our shareholders hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name.

33

Table of Contents

PART II


Issuer's Repurchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information with respect to purchases by ACE of its Common Shares during the three months ended December 31, 2012 :
Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased*

 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan**
October 1 through October 31
7,864

 
$77.71
 
 $461 million
November 1 through November 30
5,173

 
$77.46
 
 $461 million
December 1 through December 31
5,653

 
$79.33
 
 $461 million
Total
18,690

 
 
 
 
* This column includes activity related to the surrender to ACE of Common Shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees and the exercising of options by employees.
** Refer to Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the ACE Limited securities repurchase authorization. No shares were repurchased during the three months ended December 31, 2012 as part of the publicly announced plan. The $461 million of remaining authorizations at December 31, 2012 expire December 31, 2013. For the period January 1, 2013 through February 27, 2013, we repurchased 1,746,123 Common Shares for a total of $149 million in a series of open market transactions. As of February 27, 2013, $312 million in share repurchase authorizations remained through December 31, 2013.


34

Table of Contents

PART II

Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the dollar change in the cumulative total shareholder return on ACE's Common Shares from December 31, 2007 , through December 31, 2012 , as compared to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's Property-Casualty Insurance Index. The cumulative total shareholder return is a concept used to compare the performance of a company's stock over time and is the ratio of the stock price change plus the cumulative amount of dividends over the specified time period (assuming dividend reinvestment), to the stock price at the beginning of the time period. The chart depicts the value on December 31, 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 , of a $100 investment made on December 31, 2007 , with all dividends reinvested.

 
12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
ACE Limited
$100
$87
$85
$108
$123
$145
S&P 500 index
$100
$63
$80
$92
$94
$109
S&P 500 P&C index
$100
$71
$79
$86
$86
$104

35

Table of Contents


ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data of ACE as of and for each of the five years ended December 31, 2012 . These selected financial and other data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related Notes and with Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.
Effective January 1, 2012, we retrospectively adopted new accounting guidance for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. Prior year amounts and ratios contained within this report have been adjusted to reflect this adoption. Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for share data and percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2009

 
2008

Operations data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net premiums earned – excluding Life segment
$
13,761

 
$
13,528

 
$
11,875

 
$
11,710

 
$
11,987

Net premiums earned – Life segment
1,916

 
1,859

 
1,629

 
1,530

 
1,216

Total net premiums earned
15,677

 
15,387

 
13,504

 
13,240

 
13,203

Net investment income
2,181

 
2,242

 
2,070

 
2,031

 
2,062

Net realized gains (losses):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net OTTI losses recognized in income
(37
)
 
(50
)
 
(59
)
 
(397
)
 
(1,064
)
Net realized gains (losses) excluding OTTI losses
115

 
(745
)
 
491

 
201

 
(569
)
Total net realized gains (losses)
78

 
(795
)
 
432

 
(196
)
 
(1,633
)
Losses and loss expenses
9,653

 
9,520

 
7,579

 
7,422

 
7,603

Policy benefits
521

 
401

 
357

 
325

 
399

Policy acquisition costs and administrative expenses
4,542

 
4,540

 
4,218

 
3,966

 
3,887

Interest expense
250

 
250

 
224

 
225

 
230

Other (income) expense
(6
)
 
81

 
(10
)
 
93

 
(36
)
Income tax expense
270

 
502

 
553

 
521

 
367

Net income
2,706

 
1,540

 
3,085

 
2,523

 
1,182

Dividends on Preferred Shares

 

 

 

 
(24
)
Net income available to holders of Common Shares
$
2,706

 
$
1,540

 
$
3,085

 
$
2,523

 
$
1,158

Diluted earnings per share  (1)
$
7.89

 
$
4.52

 
$
9.04

 
$
7.47

 
$
3.46

Balance sheet data (at end of period):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total investments
$
60,264

 
$
55,676

 
$
51,407

 
$
46,515

 
$
39,715

Cash
615

 
614

 
772

 
669

 
867

Total assets
92,545

 
87,321

 
83,216

 
77,864

 
71,967

Net unpaid losses and loss expenses
26,547

 
25,875

 
25,242

 
25,038

 
24,241

Net future policy benefits
4,229

 
4,025

 
2,825

 
2,710

 
2,645

Long-term debt
3,360

 
3,360

 
3,358

 
3,158

 
2,806

Trust preferred securities
309

 
309

 
309

 
309

 
309

Total liabilities
65,014

 
62,989

 
60,381

 
58,313

 
57,611

Shareholders' equity
27,531

 
24,332

 
22,835

 
19,551

 
14,356

Book value per share
$
80.90

 
$
72.22

 
$
68.17

 
$
58.10

 
$
43.02

Selected data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss and loss expense ratio  (2)
65.7
%
 
66.0
%
 
59.4
%
 
58.9
%
 
60.7
%
Underwriting and administrative expense ratio  (3)
28.2
%
 
28.7
%
 
30.9
%
 
29.4
%
 
28.9
%
Combined ratio  (4)
93.9
%
 
94.7
%
 
90.3
%
 
88.3
%
 
89.6
%
Net loss reserves to capital and surplus ratio  (5)
111.8
%
 
122.9
%
 
122.9
%
 
141.9
%
 
187.3
%
Weighted-average shares outstanding – diluted
342,746,950

 
340,780,224

 
341,246,387

 
337,539,294

 
334,606,237

Cash dividends per share
$
2.06

 
$
1.38

 
$
1.30

 
$
1.19

 
$
1.09

(1)  
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing Net income available to holders of Common Shares by weighted-average shares outstanding – diluted.
(2)  
The loss and loss expense ratio is calculated by dividing Losses and loss expenses, excluding the Life segment, by Net premiums earned – excluding Life segment. Losses and loss expenses for the Life segment were $ 611 million , $ 593 million , $528 million, $532 million, and $341 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
(3)  
The underwriting and administrative expense ratio is calculated by dividing the Policy acquisition costs and administrative expenses, excluding the Life segment, by Net premiums earned – excluding Life segment. Policy acquisition costs and administrative expenses for the Life segment were $ 662 million , $ 656 million , $ 552 million , $ 525 million , and $423 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
(4)  
The combined ratio is the sum of loss and loss expense ratio and the underwriting and administrative expense ratio.
(5)  
The net loss reserves to capital and surplus ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of the Net unpaid losses and loss expenses and Net future policy benefits by Shareholders' equity.

36

Table of Contents


ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity and capital resources as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 . This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related Notes, under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
All comparisons in this discussion are to the corresponding prior year unless otherwise indicated.
Effective January 1, 2012, we retrospectively adopted new accounting guidance for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. Under the new guidance, the definition of acquisition costs was modified to specify that a cost must be directly related to the successful acquisition of a new or renewal insurance contract in order to be deferred. Prior year amounts and ratios contained in this report have been adjusted to reflect the impact of retrospective adjustments as a result of applying this new accounting guidance.
In addition, effective January 1, 2012, we reclassified prior years segment operating results in order to conform to certain organizational realignments.  These realignments resulted in a transfer of operating revenue and underwriting results of our international direct-marketed and credit life businesses from the Insurance – Overseas General segment to the Life segment. These realignments have no impact on consolidated operating results; however, prior years segment operating results and ratios contained in this report have been adjusted to conform to the current year presentation.
MD&A Index
Page
Reinsurance Recoverable on Ceded Reinsurance

37

Table of Contents


Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Any written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf may include forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could, should potential events occur, cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. These risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which are described in more detail elsewhere herein and in other documents we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), include but are not limited to:
developments in global financial markets, including changes in interest rates, stock markets, and other financial markets, increased government involvement or intervention in the financial services industry, the cost and availability of financing, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (which we refer to in this report as foreign exchange and foreign currency exchange), which could affect our statement of operations, investment portfolio, financial condition, and financing plans;
general economic and business conditions resulting from volatility in the stock and credit markets and the depth and duration of recession;
losses arising out of natural or man-made catastrophes such as hurricanes, typhoons, earthquakes, floods, climate change (including effects on weather patterns, greenhouse gases, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain and snow), nuclear accidents or terrorism which could be affected by:
the number of insureds and ceding companies affected;
the amount and timing of losses actually incurred and reported by insureds;
the impact of these losses on our reinsurers and the amount and timing of reinsurance recoverable actually received;
the cost of building materials and labor to reconstruct properties or to perform environmental remediation following a catastrophic event; and
complex coverage and regulatory issues such as whether losses occurred from storm surge or flooding and related lawsuits;
actions that rating agencies may take from time to time, such as financial strength or credit ratings downgrades or placing these ratings on credit watch negative or the equivalent;
global political conditions, the occurrence of any terrorist attacks, including any nuclear, radiological, biological, or chemical events, or the outbreak and effects of war, and possible business disruption or economic contraction that may result from such events;
the ability to collect reinsurance recoverable, credit developments of reinsurers, and any delays with respect thereto and changes in the cost, quality, or availability of reinsurance;
actual loss experience from insured or reinsured events and the timing of claim payments;
the uncertainties of the loss-reserving and claims-settlement processes, including the difficulties associated with assessing environmental damage and asbestos-related latent injuries, the impact of aggregate-policy-coverage limits, and the impact of bankruptcy protection sought by various asbestos producers and other related businesses and the timing of loss payments;
changes to our assessment as to whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell, or have the intent to sell, available for sale fixed maturity investments before their anticipated recovery;
infection rates and severity of pandemics and their effects on our business operations and claims activity;
judicial decisions and rulings, new theories of liability, legal tactics, and settlement terms;
the effects of public company bankruptcies and/or accounting restatements, as well as disclosures by and investigations of public companies relating to possible accounting irregularities, and other corporate governance issues, including the effects of such events on:
the capital markets;
the markets for directors and officers (D&O) and errors and omissions (E&O) insurance; and
claims and litigation arising out of such disclosures or practices by other companies;

38

Table of Contents

uncertainties relating to governmental, legislative and regulatory policies, developments, actions, investigations and treaties, which, among other things, could subject us to insurance regulation or taxation in additional jurisdictions or affect our current operations;
the actual amount of new and renewal business, market acceptance of our products, and risks associated with the introduction of new products and services and entering new markets, including regulatory constraints on exit strategies;
the competitive environment in which we operate, including trends in pricing or in policy terms and conditions, which may differ from our projections and changes in market conditions that could render our business strategies ineffective or obsolete;
acquisitions made by us performing differently than expected, our failure to realize anticipated expense-related efficiencies or growth from acquisitions, the impact of acquisitions on our pre-existing organization or announced acquisitions not closing;
risks associated with being a Swiss corporation, including reduced flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital management and the potential for additional regulatory burdens;
the potential impact from government-mandated insurance coverage for acts of terrorism;
the availability of borrowings and letters of credit under our credit facilities;
the adequacy of collateral supporting funded high deductible programs;
changes in the distribution or placement of risks due to increased consolidation of insurance and reinsurance brokers;
material differences between actual and expected assessments for guaranty funds and mandatory pooling arrangements;
the effects of investigations into market practices in the property and casualty (P&C) industry;
changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions, for example, recession;
the amount of dividends received from subsidiaries;
loss of the services of any of our executive officers without suitable replacements being recruited in a reasonable time frame;
the ability of our technology resources to perform as anticipated; and
management’s response to these factors and actual events (including, but not limited to, those described above).
The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “hope,” “feel,” “foresee,” “will likely result,” or “will continue,” and variations thereof and similar expressions, identify forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


39

Table of Contents

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Overview
ACE Limited is the Swiss-incorporated holding company of the ACE Group of Companies. ACE opened its business office in Bermuda in 1985 and continues to maintain operations in Bermuda. ACE, which is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, are a global insurance and reinsurance organization, serving the needs of a diverse group of clients around the world. We are predominantly a global P&C insurance company with both a commercial and specialty product orientation. We offer commercial insurance, specialty products and accident and health (A&H) solutions and are expanding our personal lines and international life insurance businesses. As we have grown, we have developed products and diversified our offerings to meet the needs of our customers. At December 31, 2012 , we had total assets of $93 billion and shareholders’ equity of $28 billion.
We operate through the following business segments: Insurance – North American, Insurance – Overseas General, Global Reinsurance, and Life.
The Insurance – North American segment includes retail divisions ACE USA (including ACE Canada), ACE Commercial Risk Services, and ACE Private Risk Services; our wholesale and specialty divisions ACE Westchester, ACE Agriculture, and ACE Bermuda; and various run-off operations, including Brandywine Holdings Corporation (Brandywine). Our retail products range from commercial lines with service offerings such as risk management, loss control and engineering programs, specialty commercial P&C and A&H coverages to personal lines homeowners, automobile liability, valuables, and marine coverages. Our wholesale and specialty products include excess and surplus property, D&O, professional liability, surety, inland marine, specialty property, specialty casualty, environmental, medical liability, political risk, captive programs, comprehensive multiple peril crop, crop-hail, farm P&C, and other agribusiness insurance products. On November 30, 2011, ACE Agriculture expanded its business through the acquisition of Penn Millers Holding Corporation (PMHC). The consolidated financial statements include the results of PMHC from the acquisition date.
The Insurance – Overseas General segment comprises ACE International, our retail business serving territories outside the U.S., Bermuda, and Canada; the international A&H business of Combined Insurance (Combined); and the wholesale insurance business of ACE Global Markets (AGM). ACE International has a presence in major developed markets and growing economies serving multinational clients and local customers. A significant amount of our global business is with local companies, offering traditional and specialty P&C products including D&O and professional liability, specialty personal lines, and energy products. Our international A&H business primarily focuses on personal accident and supplemental medical. AGM offers specialty products including aviation, marine, financial lines, energy, and political risk. On September 18, 2012, we acquired 80 percent of PT Asuransi Jaya Proteksi (JaPro) and on January 3, 2013 our local partner acquired the remaining 20 percent . Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The acquisition of JaPro diversified our business in Indonesia with a well-established personal lines insurance franchise, and expanded the potential for A&H and commercial P&C businesses. The consolidated financial statements include the results of JaPro from the acquisition date.
The Global Reinsurance segment represents our reinsurance operations, comprising ACE Tempest Re Bermuda, ACE Tempest Re USA, ACE Tempest Re International, ACE Tempest Re Canada, and the reinsurance operation of AGM. Global Reinsurance provides solutions for customers ranging from small commercial insureds to multinational ceding companies. Global Reinsurance offers products such as property and workers’ compensation catastrophe, D&O, professional liability, specialty casualty and specialty property.
The Life segment includes our international life operations (ACE Life), ACE Tempest Life Re (ACE Life Re), and the North American supplemental A&H and life business of Combined Insurance. ACE Life expanded its business through the February 1, 2011 acquisition of New York Life's Korea operations and the April 2, 2011 acquisition of New York Life's Hong Kong operations. The consolidated financial statements include the results of these acquired businesses from the acquisition dates.
For additional information on each of our segments refer to “Segment Information” under Item 1.

Our product and geographic diversification differentiates us from the vast majority of our competitors and has been a source of stability during periods of industry volatility. Our long-term business strategy focuses on sustained growth in book value achieved through a combination of underwriting and investment income. By doing so, we provide value to our clients and shareholders through the utilization of our substantial capital base in the insurance and reinsurance markets.

We are organized along a profit center structure by line of business and territory that does not necessarily correspond to corporate legal entities. Profit centers can access various legal entities, subject to licensing and other regulatory rules. Profit centers are expected to generate underwriting income and appropriate risk-adjusted returns. This corporate structure has facilitated the development of management talent by giving each profit center's senior management team the necessary

40

Table of Contents

autonomy within underwriting authorities to make operating decisions and create products and coverages needed by its target customer base. We are an underwriting organization and senior management is focused on delivering underwriting profit. We strive to achieve underwriting income by only writing policies which we believe adequately compensate us for the risk we accept.

Our insurance and reinsurance operations generate gross revenues from two principal sources: premiums and investment income. Cash flow is generated from premiums collected and investment income received less paid losses and loss expenses, policy acquisition costs, and administrative expenses. Invested assets are substantially held in liquid, investment grade fixed income securities of relatively short duration. Claims payments in any short-term period are highly unpredictable due to the random nature of loss events and the timing of claims awards or settlements. The value of investments held to pay future claims is subject to market forces such as the level of interest rates, stock market volatility, and credit events such as corporate defaults. The actual cost of claims is also volatile based on loss trends, inflation rates, court awards, and catastrophes. We believe that our cash balance, our highly liquid investments, credit facilities, and reinsurance protection provide sufficient liquidity to meet unforeseen claim demands that might occur in the year ahead. Refer to “Liquidity” and “Capital Resources” for additional information

During 2012, we announced that we reached definitive agreements to acquire Fianzas Monterrey, a leading surety lines company in Mexico, as well as ABA Seguros, a P&C insurer in Mexico that provides automobile, homeowners, and small business coverages. These transactions, which are subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, are expected to be completed in the first half of 2013. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Financial Highlights for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Net income increased 75.6 percent to $2.7 billion.
Total company net premiums written increased 4.6 percent and 6.0 percent on a constant-dollar basis.
P&C combined ratio was 93.9 percent compared with 94.7 percent in 2011.
P&C expense ratio was 28.2 percent compared with 28.7 percent in 2011.
The current accident year P&C combined ratio was 97.4 percent compared with 98.8 percent in 2011.
Favorable prior period development was $479 million, representing 3.5 percentage points of the combined ratio. This compares to favorable prior period development of $556 million in 2011, representing 4.1 percentage points of the combined ratio.
Total pre-tax and after-tax catastrophe losses including reinstatement premiums were $638 million and $495 million, respectively, which included Superstorm Sandy losses of $502 million and $393 million, respectively. This compares to pre-tax and after-tax catastrophe losses including reinstatement premiums of $899 million and $767 million, respectively, in 2011.
Operating cash flow was $4.0 billion compared with $3.5 billion in 2011.
Net investment income decreased 2.8 percent to $2.2 billion.
Net realized losses from derivative accounting related to variable annuity reinsurance were $126 million compared to $783 million in 2011.
Our underwriting performance reflects numerous factors, including an improved price environment in the U.S.; global business growth in Asia, Latin America, and Europe; balanced product spread among commercial P&C, specialty P&C, A&H, personal lines, and life; and a continuing focus on underwriting and marketing discipline through the use of data analytics and portfolio management that complements a strong underwriting culture. Our commercial and specialty P&C business grew in the U.S., Asia, and Latin America and, more modestly, in Europe. Our A&H insurance business grew globally in constant dollars and we expect that growth to increase throughout 2013. We also expect our commercial P&C business in the U.S. to continue to benefit from an improving price environment. In addition, we believe certain casualty lines will benefit from price increases in 2013 while property pricing will likely flatten as the year progresses. During the year, we committed or deployed capital to acquisitions in regions of the world that are expected to enhance our growth and diversification strategies. These acquisitions,

41

Table of Contents

along with a strong U.S. pricing environment, strong retention rates, and new business activities are expected to result in profitable growth in 2013.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements include amounts that, either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP), are determined using best estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment, actual amounts could ultimately materially differ from those currently presented. We believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are:

unpaid loss and loss expense reserves, including long-tail asbestos and environmental (A&E) reserves;
future policy benefits reserves;
the valuation of value of business acquired (VOBA) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and VOBA;
the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts;
reinsurance recoverable, including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance;
the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI);
the valuation of deferred tax assets;
the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed living benefits (GLB); and
the valuation of goodwill.

We believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements. The following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled: Prior Period Development, Asbestos and Environmental (A&E) and Other Run-off Liabilities, Reinsurance Recoverable on Ceded Reinsurance, Investments, Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses), and Other Income and Expense Items.

Unpaid losses and loss expenses
As an insurance and reinsurance company, we are required by applicable laws and regulations and GAAP to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers. The estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date (case reserves) and for obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported (IBNR) at the balance sheet date. IBNR may also include provisions to account for the possibility that reported claims may settle for amounts that differ from the established case reserves. Loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims (loss expenses). At December 31, 2012 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $37.9 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $26.5 billion. With the exception of certain structured settlements, for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determinable, and certain reserves for unsettled claims that are discounted in statutory filings, our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money. In connection with such structured settlements and certain reserves for unsettled claims, we carried net discounted reserves of $105 million at December 31, 2012 and $94 million at December 31, 2011 .

42

Table of Contents

The table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses:
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Gross
Losses

 
Reinsurance
Recoverable (1)

 
Net
Losses

 
Gross
Losses

 
Reinsurance
Recoverable (1)

 
Net
Losses

Balance, beginning of year
$
37,477

 
$
11,602

 
$
25,875

 
$
37,391

 
$
12,149

 
$
25,242

Losses and loss expenses incurred
13,927

 
4,274

 
9,653

 
12,845

 
3,325

 
9,520

Losses and loss expenses paid
(13,783
)
 
(4,564
)
 
(9,219
)
 
(12,780
)
 
(3,914
)
 
(8,866
)
Other (including foreign exchange translation)
311

 
87

 
224

 
(103
)
 
10

 
(113
)
Losses and loss expenses acquired
14

 

 
14

 
124

 
32

 
92

Balance, end of year
$
37,946

 
$
11,399

 
$
26,547

 
$
37,477

 
$
11,602

 
$
25,875

(1)  
Net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance.
The process of establishing loss reserves for property and casualty claims can be complex and is subject to considerable uncertainty as it requires the use of informed estimates and judgments based on circumstances known at the date of accrual.
The following table presents our total reserves segregated between case reserves (includes loss expense reserves) and IBNR reserves:
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Gross

 
Ceded

 
Net

 
Gross

 
Ceded

 
Net

Case reserves
$
16,804

 
$
5,406

 
$
11,398

 
$
17,143

 
$
5,681

 
$
11,462

IBNR reserves
21,142

 
5,993

 
15,149

 
20,334

 
5,921

 
14,413

Total
$
37,946

 
$
11,399

 
$
26,547

 
$
37,477

 
$
11,602

 
$
25,875


43

Table of Contents

The following table segregates loss reserves by three broad line of business groupings: property and all other, casualty, and A&H (or personal accident). In the table, loss expenses are defined to include unallocated and allocated loss adjustment expenses.
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
Gross

 
Ceded

 
Net

 
Gross

 
Ceded

 
Net

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and all other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case reserves
 
$
3,274

 
$
1,551

 
$
1,723

 
$
3,267

 
$
1,258

 
$
2,009

 
Loss expenses
 
191

 
39

 
152

 
222

 
48

 
174

 
IBNR reserves
 
2,511

 
1,007

 
1,504

 
2,188

 
892

 
1,296

 
Subtotal
 
5,976

 
2,597

 
3,379

 
5,677

 
2,198

 
3,479

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Casualty
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case reserves
 
9,017

 
2,366

 
6,651

 
8,907

 
2,396

 
6,511

 
Loss expenses
 
3,821

 
1,337

 
2,484

 
4,165

 
1,849

 
2,316

 
IBNR reserves
 
17,973

 
4,743

 
13,230

 
17,451

 
4,811

 
12,640

 
Subtotal
 
30,811

 
8,446

 
22,365

 
30,523

 
9,056

 
21,467

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A&H
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case reserves
 
471

 
105

 
366

 
555

 
126

 
429

 
Loss expenses
 
30

 
8

 
22

 
27

 
4

 
23

 
IBNR reserves
 
658

 
243

 
415

 
695

 
218

 
477

 
Subtotal
 
1,159

 
356

 
803

 
1,277

 
348

 
929

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case reserves
 
12,762

 
4,022

 
8,740

 
12,729

 
3,780

 
8,949

 
Loss expenses
 
4,042

 
1,384

 
2,658

 
4,414

 
1,901

 
2,513

 
IBNR reserves
 
21,142

 
5,993

 
15,149

 
20,334

 
5,921

 
14,413

 
Total
 
$
37,946

 
$
11,399

 
$
26,547

 
$
37,477

 
$
11,602


$
25,875

The judgments used to estimate unpaid loss and loss expense reserves require different considerations depending upon the individual circumstances underlying the insured loss. For example, the reserves established for high excess casualty claims, A&E claims, claims from major catastrophic events, or the IBNR for our various product lines each require different assumptions and judgments to be made. Necessary judgments are based on numerous factors and may be revised as additional experience and other data become available and are reviewed, as new or improved methods are developed, or as laws change. Hence, ultimate loss payments may differ from the estimate of the ultimate liabilities made at the balance sheet date. Changes to our previous estimates of prior period loss reserves impact the reported calendar year underwriting results, adversely if our estimates increase and favorably if our estimates decrease. The potential for variation in loss reserves is impacted by numerous factors, which we discuss below.
We establish loss and loss expense reserves for our claims liabilities for all insurance and reinsurance business that we write. For those claims reported by insureds or ceding companies to us prior to the balance sheet date, and where we have sufficient information, our claims personnel establish case reserves as appropriate based on the circumstances of the claim(s), standard claim handling practices, and professional judgment. Furthermore, for our assumed reinsurance operation, Global Reinsurance, an additional case reserve may be established above the amount notified by the ceding company if the notified case reserve is judged to be insufficient by Global Reinsurance's claims department (refer to “Assumed reinsurance” below). In respect of those claims that have been incurred but not reported prior to the balance sheet date, there is, by definition, limited actual information to form the case reserve estimate and reliance is placed upon historical loss experience and actuarial methods to project the ultimate loss obligations and the corresponding amount of IBNR.
We have actuarial staff within each of our business units who analyze loss reserves and regularly project estimates of ultimate losses and the corresponding indications of the required IBNR reserve. Note that losses include loss expenses for the purposes of this discussion. IBNR reserve estimates are generally calculated by first projecting the ultimate amount of losses for a product line and subtracting paid losses and case reserves for reported claims. The judgments involved in projecting the ultimate losses may pertain to the use and interpretation of various standard actuarial reserving methods that place reliance on

44

Table of Contents

the extrapolation of actual historical data, loss development patterns, and industry data as appropriate. The estimate of the required IBNR reserve also requires judgment by actuaries and management to reflect the impact of more contemporary and subjective factors, both qualitative and quantitative. Among some of these factors that might be considered are changes in business mix or volume, changes in ceded reinsurance structures, changes in claims handling practices, reported and projected loss trends, inflation, the legal environment, and the terms and conditions of the contracts sold to our insured parties.
Typically, for each product line, one or more standard actuarial reserving methods may be used to estimate ultimate losses and loss expenses, and from these estimates, a single actuarial central estimate is selected. Exceptions to the use of standard actuarial projection methods occur for individual claims of significance that require complex legal, claims, and actuarial analysis and judgment (for example, A&E account projections or high excess casualty/professional lines accounts in litigation) or for product lines where the nature of the claims experience and/or availability of the data prevent application of such standard methods. In addition, claims arising from certain catastrophic events require evaluations that do not utilize standard actuarial loss projection methods but are based upon our exposure at the time of the event and the circumstances of the catastrophe and its post-event impact.
Standard actuarial reserving method s
The standard actuarial reserving methods may include, but are not limited to, expected loss ratio, paid and reported loss development, and Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods. A general description of these methods is provided below. In the subsequent discussion on short- and long-tail business, reference is also made, where appropriate, to how consideration in method selection impacted 2012 results. In addition to these standard methods, we may use other recognized actuarial methods and approaches depending upon the product line characteristics and available data. To ensure that the projections of future loss emergence based on historical loss development patterns are representative of the underlying business, the historical loss and premium data is required to be of sufficient homogeneity and credibility. For example, to improve data homogeneity, we may subdivide product line data further by similar risk attribute (e.g., geography, coverage such as property versus liability exposure, or elements of program structure such as attachments or limits), project ultimate losses for these homogeneous groups and then combine the results to provide the overall product line estimate. The premium and loss data are aggregated by origin year (e.g., the year in which the losses were incurred - “accident year” or “report year”, for example) and annual or quarterly development periods. Implicit in the standard actuarial methods that we generally utilize is the need for two fundamental assumptions: first, the pattern by which losses are expected to emerge over time for each origin year and second, the expected loss ratio for each origin year.
The expected loss ratio for any particular origin year is selected after consideration of a number of factors, including historical loss ratios adjusted for intervening rate changes, premium and loss trends, industry benchmarks, the results of policy level loss modeling at the time of underwriting, and other more subjective considerations for the product line and external environment as noted above. The expected loss ratio for a given origin year is initially established at the start of the origin year as part of the planning process. This analysis is performed in conjunction with underwriters and management. The expected loss ratio method arrives at an ultimate loss estimate by multiplying the expected ultimate loss ratio by the corresponding premium base. This method is most commonly used as the basis for the actuarial central estimate for immature origin periods on product lines where the actual paid or reported loss experience is not yet deemed sufficiently credible to serve as the principal basis for the selection of ultimate losses. The expected loss ratio for a given origin year may be modified over time if the underlying assumptions such as the assessment of prior year loss ratios, loss trend, or premium rate changes differ from the original assumptions.
Our selected paid and reported development patterns provide a benchmark against which the actual emerging loss experience can be monitored. Where possible, development patterns are selected based on historical loss emergence by origin year with appropriate allowance for changes in business mix, claims handling process, or ceded reinsurance that are likely to lead to a discernible difference between the rate of historical and future loss emergence. For product lines where the historical data is viewed to have low statistical credibility, the selected development patterns also reflect relevant industry benchmarks and/or experience from similar product lines written elsewhere within ACE. This most commonly occurs for relatively new product lines that have limited historical data or for high severity/low frequency portfolios where our historical experience exhibits considerable volatility and/or lacks credibility. The paid and reported loss development methods convert the selected loss emergence pattern to a set of multiplicative factors which are then applied to actual paid or reported losses to arrive at an estimate of ultimate losses for each period. Due to their multiplicative nature, the paid and reported loss development methods will leverage differences between actual and expected loss emergence. These methods tend to be utilized for more mature origin periods and for those portfolios where the loss emergence has been relatively consistent over time.
The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method is essentially a combination of the expected loss ratio method and the loss development method, where the loss development method is given more weight as the origin year matures. This approach allows a logical

45

Table of Contents

transition between the expected loss ratio method which is generally utilized at earlier maturities and the loss development methods which are typically utilized at later maturities. We usually apply this method using reported loss data although paid data may be used.
The applicability of actuarial methods will also be impacted by the attachment point of the policy or contract with the insured or ceding company. In the case of low attachment points typical of primary insurance or working layer reinsurance, the experience tends to be more frequency driven. For these product types, standard actuarial methods generally work well in determining loss reserve levels, as the loss experience is often credible, given a sufficient history and volume of claims experience. In the case of high attachment points typical of excess insurance or excess of loss reinsurance, the experience tends to be severity driven, as only a loss of significant size will enter the layer. For these product lines, it typically takes longer for loss experience to gain credibility, which adds uncertainty to the estimates derived from standard actuarial methods. For products such as our assumed reinsurance business, we typically supplement the standard actuarial methods with an analysis of each contract's terms, original pricing information, subsequent internal and external analyses of the ongoing contracts, market exposures and history, and qualitative input from claims managers. This approach is also used for structured or unique contracts.
Determining management's best estimate
Our recorded reserves represent management's best estimate of the provision for unpaid claims as of the balance sheet date. We perform an actuarial reserve review for each product line at least once a year. At the conclusion of each review, we establish an actuarial central estimate. The process to select the actuarial central estimate, when more than one estimate is available, may differ across product lines. For example, an actuary may base the central estimate on loss projections developed using an incurred loss development approach instead of a paid loss development approach when reported losses are viewed to be a more credible indication of the ultimate loss compared with paid losses. The availability of estimates for different projection techniques will depend upon the product line, the underwriting circumstances, and the maturity of the loss emergence. For a well-established product line with sufficient volume and history, the actuarial central estimate may be drawn from a weighting of paid and reported loss development and/or Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods. However, for a new long-tail product line for which we have limited data and experience or a rapidly growing line, the emerging loss experience may not have sufficient credibility to allow selection of loss development or Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods and reliance may be placed upon the expected loss ratio method until the experience matures and becomes credible.
Management's best estimate is developed from the actuarial central estimate after collaboration with actuarial, underwriting, claims, legal, and finance departments and culminates with the input of reserve committees. Each business unit reserve committee includes the participation of the relevant parties from actuarial, finance, claims, and unit senior management and has the responsibility for finalizing and approving the estimate to be used as management's best estimate. Reserves are further reviewed by ACE's Chief Actuary and senior management. The objective of such a process is to determine a single estimate that we believe represents a better estimate than any other. Such an estimate is viewed by management to be the best estimate of ultimate loss settlements and is determined based on consideration of a number of factors in addition to the actuarial central estimate, including but not limited to:
segmentation of data to provide sufficient homogeneity and credibility for loss projection methods;
extent of internal historical loss data, and industry information where required;
historical variability of actual loss emergence compared with expected loss emergence;
perceived credibility of emerged loss experience;
rate monitor information for new and renewal business;
impact of applicable reinsurance recoveries; and
nature and extent of underlying assumptions.

Management does not build in any specific provision for uncertainty.
We do not calculate ranges of loss reserve estimates for our individual loss reserve studies. Such ranges are generally not a true reflection of the potential difference between loss reserves estimated at the balance sheet date and the ultimate settlement value of losses. This is due to the fact that an actuarial range is developed based on known events as of the valuation date whereas actual prior period development reported in subsequent consolidated financial statements relates in part to events and circumstances that were unknown as of the original valuation date. While we believe that our recorded reserves are reasonable and represent management's best estimate for each product line as of the current valuation date, future changes to our view of

46

Table of Contents

the ultimate liabilities are possible. A five percent change in our net loss reserves equates to $1.3 billion and represents five percent of shareholders' equity at December 31, 2012 . Historically, including A&E reserve charges, our reserves, at times, have developed in excess of 10 percent of recorded amounts. Refer to “Analysis of Losses and Loss Expenses Development”, under Item 1, for a summary of historical volatility between estimated loss reserves and ultimate loss settlements.
We perform internal loss reserve studies for all product lines at least once a year according to a schedule that is established at the start of the calendar year. In addition, each quarter for most product lines, we review the emergence of actual losses relative to expectations. If warranted from findings in loss emergence tests, we may alter the timing of our product line reserve studies. Finally, loss reserve studies are performed annually by external third-parties and the findings are used to test the reasonableness of our internal findings.
The time period between the date of loss occurrence and the final payment date of the ensuing claim(s) is referred to as the “claim-tail”. The following is a discussion of specific reserving considerations for both short-tail and long-tail product lines. In this section, we reference the nature of recent prior period development to give a high-level understanding of how these considerations translate through the reserving process into financial decisions. Refer to the "Prior Period Development" section below for additional information on prior period development.
Short-tail and long-tail business
Short-tail business
Short-tail business generally describes product lines for which losses are typically known and paid shortly after the loss actually occurs. This would include, for example, most property, personal accident, aviation hull, and automobile physical damage policies that we write. There are some exceptions on certain product lines or events (e.g., major hurricanes or earthquakes) where the event has occurred, but the final settlement amount is highly uncertain and not known with certainty for a potentially lengthy period. Due to the short reporting and development pattern for these product lines, the uncertainty associated with our estimate of ultimate losses for any particular accident period diminishes relatively quickly as actual loss experience emerges. We typically assign credibility to methods that incorporate actual loss emergence, such as the paid and reported loss development and Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods, sooner than would be the case for long-tail lines at a similar stage of development for a given origin year. The reserving process for short-tail losses arising from catastrophic events typically involves an assessment by the claims department, in conjunction with underwriters and actuaries, of our exposure and estimated losses immediately following an event and then subsequent revisions of the estimated losses as our insureds provide updated actual loss information.
For the 2012 origin year, the short-tail line loss reserves were typically established for the non-catastrophe exposures using a combination of the expected loss ratio method and methods that incorporate actual loss emergence. As the year progressed, we also adjusted these reserves for large non-catastrophe loss activity that we considered to be greater or less than the historical averages. Reserves were also established for losses that arose on catastrophe activity during 2012 using the approach described above. The underlying calculation for the non-catastrophe losses requires initial expected loss ratios by product line adjusted for actual experience during the 2012 calendar year. As previously noted, the derivation of initial loss ratios incorporates actuarial projections of prior years' losses, past and expected future loss and exposure trends, rate adequacy for new and renewal business, and ceded reinsurance coverage and costs. We also considered our view of the impact of terms and conditions and the market environment, which by their nature tend to be more subjective relative to other factors. Since there is some degree of random volatility of non-catastrophe loss experience from year to year, we considered average loss experience over several years when developing loss estimates for the current accident year. For our short-tail businesses taken as a whole, overall loss trend assumptions did not differ significantly relative to prior years.
In terms of prior accident years, the bulk of the changes made in the 2012 calendar year arose from origin years 2008 through 2010. Specifically, the Insurance – North American, Insurance – Overseas General, and Global Reinsurance segments experienced $115 million, $105 million, and $29 million of favorable prior period development, respectively, primarily due to lower than anticipated loss emergence rather than any significant changes to underlying actuarial assumptions such as loss development patterns. In the Insurance – North American and Insurance – Overseas General segments, these prior period movements were primarily the result of changes to the ultimate loss estimates for origin years 2008 through 2010. In the Global Reinsurance segment, the prior period movements were primarily the result of changes to the ultimate loss estimates for origin years 2007 through 2010.
For further analysis of changes in assumptions related to short-tail prior accident year reserves during calendar year 2012 , refer to the “Prior Period Development” section below.

47

Table of Contents

Long-tail business
Long-tail business describes lines of business for which specific losses may not be known/reported for some period and for which claims can take significant time to settle/close. This includes most casualty lines such as general liability, D&O, and workers' compensation. There are various factors contributing to the uncertainty and volatility of long-tail business. Among these are:

Our historical loss data and experience is sometimes too immature and lacking in credibility to rely upon for reserving purposes. Where this is the case, in our reserve analysis we may utilize industry loss ratios or industry benchmark development patterns that we believe reflect the nature and coverage of the underwritten business and its future development, where available. For such product lines, actual loss experience may differ from industry loss statistics as well as loss experience for previous underwriting years;
The inherent uncertainty around loss trends, claims inflation (e.g., medical and judicial) and underlying economic conditions;
The inherent uncertainty of the estimated duration of the paid and reported loss development patterns beyond the historical record requires that professional judgment be used in the determination of the length of the patterns based on the historical data and other information;
The inherent uncertainty of assuming that historical paid and reported loss development patterns for older origin years will be representative of subsequent loss emergence on recent origin years. For example, changes over time in the processes and procedures for establishing case reserves can distort reported loss development patterns or changes in ceded reinsurance structures by origin year can alter the development of paid and reported losses;
Loss reserve analyses typically require loss or other data be grouped by common characteristics in some manner. If data from two combined lines of business exhibit different characteristics, such as loss payment patterns, the credibility of the reserve estimate could be affected. Additionally, since casualty lines of business can have significant intricacies in the terms and conditions afforded to the insured, there is an inherent risk as to the homogeneity of the underlying data used in performing reserve analyses; and
The applicability of the price change data used to estimate ultimate loss ratios for most recent origin years.

As can be seen from the above, various factors are considered when determining appropriate data, assumptions, and methods used to establish the loss reserve estimates for long-tail product lines. These factors may also vary by origin year for given product lines. The derivation of loss development patterns from data and the selection of a tail factor to project ultimate losses from actual loss emergence require considerable judgment, particularly with respect to the extent to which historical loss experience is relied upon to support changes in key reserving assumptions. Examples of the relationship between changes in historical loss experience and key reserving assumptions are provided below.
For those long-tail product lines that are less claim frequency and more claim severity oriented, such as professional lines and high excess casualty, we placed more reliance upon expert legal and claims review of the specific circumstances underlying reported cases rather than loss development patterns. Where appropriate, we then supplemented this with loss development and Bornhuetter-Ferguson approaches to provide for claims that have been reported but are too immature to develop individual claims estimates and also to provide for pure IBNR. The assumptions used for these lines of business are updated over time to reflect new claim and legal advice judged to be of significance.
For the 2012 origin year, loss reserves were typically established through the application of individual product line expected loss ratios that contemplated assumptions similar in nature to those noted in the short-tail line discussion. Our assumptions on loss trend and development patterns reflect reliance on our historical loss data provided the length and volume of history and homogeneity afford credibility. For those portfolios where we feel that our data lacks credibility, our assumptions may judgmentally utilize industry loss trends and development patterns. We note that industry patterns are not always available to match the nature of the business being written; this issue is particularly problematic for non-U.S. exposed lines. Given the underlying volatility of the long-tail product lines and the lengthy period required for full paid and reported loss emergence, we typically assign little to no credibility to actual loss emergence in the early development periods. Accordingly, we generally used the expected loss ratio method for the 2012 and immediately preceding origin years to establish reserves by product line. We monitor actual paid and reported loss emergence relative to expected loss emergence for most individual product lines.
The process to develop 2012 origin year reserves for our long-tail casualty business relies heavily on prior origin year estimates of ultimate and historical loss ratios adjusted to current rate and loss trend levels. When estimating the ultimate loss levels for these prior origin years for the major long-tail lines in Insurance – North American, Insurance – Overseas General, and Global

48

Table of Contents

Reinsurance no changes of significance were made to the loss development patterns, however, we have revised historical loss and exposure trend assumptions to reflect emerged frequency and severity trends observed in both our internal data and available industry data. In general, this has resulted in lower historical loss trend assumptions. While we have not assumed that these reduced loss trends continued in 2012 , we have reflected this information in the process to derive expected loss ratio assumptions from historical data adjusted to 2012 origin year levels.
For long-tail portfolios where actual loss emergence in calendar year 2012 was lower than expected for the more recent origin years, the deviation was not typically seen as sufficiently credible, particularly given the volatility and lengthy period for full loss emergence, to fully reflect in our booked ultimate loss selections or the actuarial assumptions underlying the reserve reviews. However, for certain product lines with early loss emergence on more recent origin years that was greater than expected, we did respond since we believe that such adverse emergence is generally significant relative to the loss emergence pattern assumptions (e.g., origin years 2009 through 2011 for casualty and financial lines in Insurance – Overseas General). Such judgments were made with due consideration to the factors impacting reserve uncertainty as discussed above. The reserve actions that we took in 2012 are discussed further below and in the section entitled “Prior Period Development”.
For more mature origin years, typically 2008 and prior, we gave meaningful weight to indicated ultimates derived from methods that rely on the paid and reported loss development patterns based on historical experience where sufficient credibility existed. This is consistent with our historical approach of allowing favorable loss emergence sufficient time to be reliably established before assigning it full credibility. For those lines where the historical experience lacked credibility, we placed reliance upon the latest benchmark patterns (where available) from external industry bodies such as Insurance Services Office (ISO) or the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI). In such cases, the assumptions used to project ultimate loss estimates will not fully reflect our own actual loss experience until our data is deemed sufficiently credible.
The prior period development in 2012 for long-tail lines of business comprised several main components. First, we experienced favorable prior period development on a number of product lines where actual loss emergence was lower than expected and/or increased weighting was given to experience-based methods as relevant origin years mature (typically 2008 and prior). In particular, this included umbrella and excess casualty business, D&O, and medical risk operations product lines in Insurance – North American principally in origin years 2006 and 2007 ($197 million favorable), casualty and financial lines in Insurance – Overseas General for origin years 2008 and prior ($150 million favorable), and origin years 2008 and prior for long-tail product lines in Global Reinsurance ($54 million favorable). Second, we experienced adverse development on 2009 and subsequent years in casualty and financial lines in Insurance – Overseas General ($29 million) principally arising from specific circumstances on certain larger claims and on 2006 and subsequent years in non-medical professional liability in Global Reinsurance ($34 million) principally due to higher than expected loss emergence. Third, we experienced adverse development from Insurance – North American inactive product lines including Westchester and Brandywine run-off operations ($168 million). The causes for the Westchester and Brandywine operations are described further below.

For further analysis of changes in assumptions related to long-tail prior accident year reserves during calendar year 2012 , refer to the “Prior Period Development” section below.

Sensitivity to underlying assumptions
While we believe that our reserve for unpaid losses and loss expenses at December 31, 2012 , is adequate, new information or emerging trends that differ from our assumptions may lead to future development of losses and loss expenses that is significantly greater or less than the recorded reserve, which could have a material effect on future operating results. As noted previously, our best estimate of required loss reserves for most portfolios is judgmentally selected for each origin year after considering the results from any number of reserving methods and is not a purely mechanical process. Therefore, it is difficult to convey, in a simple and quantitative manner, the impact that a change to a single assumption will have on our best estimate. In the examples below, we attempt to give an indication of the potential impact by isolating a single change for a specific reserving method that would be pertinent in establishing the best estimate for the product line described. We consider each of the following sensitivity analyses to represent a reasonably likely deviation in the underlying assumption.

Insurance – North American
Given the long reporting and paid development patterns for workers' compensation business, the development factors used to project actual current losses to ultimate losses for the company's current exposure requires considerable judgment that could be material to consolidated loss and loss expense reserves. Specifically, adjusting ground up ultimate losses by a one percent change in the tail factor (i.e., 1.04 changed to either 1.05 or 1.03) would cause a change of approximately $344 million, either positive or negative, for the projected net loss and loss expense reserves. This represents an impact of 9.4 percent relative to recorded net loss and loss expense reserves of approximately $3.6 billion.

49

Table of Contents

The reserve portfolio for our ACE Bermuda operations contains exposure to predominantly high excess liability coverage on an occurrence-first-reported basis (typically with attachment points in excess of $325 million and gross limits of up to $150 million) and D&O and other professional liability coverage on a claims-made basis (typically with attachment points in excess of $125 million and gross limits of up to $75 million). Due to the layer of exposure covered, the expected frequency for this book is very low. As a result of the low frequency/high severity nature of the book, a small difference in the actual vs. expected claim frequency, either positive or negative, could result in a material change to the projected ultimate loss if such change in claim frequency was related to a policy where close to maximum limits were deployed.

Insurance – Overseas General
Certain long-tail lines, such as casualty and professional lines, are particularly susceptible to changes in loss trend and claim inflation.  Heightened perceptions of tort and settlement awards around the world are increasing the demand for these products as well as contributing to the uncertainty in the reserving estimates.  Our reserving methods rely on loss development patterns estimated from historical data and while we attempt to adjust such factors for known changes in the current tort environment, it is possible that such factors may not entirely reflect all recent trends in tort environments.  For example, when applying the reported loss development method, the lengthening of our selected loss development patterns by six months would increase reserve estimates on long-tail casualty and professional lines for accident years 2010 and prior by approximately $280 million. This represents an impact of 11.8 percent relative to recorded net loss and loss expense reserves of approximately $2.4 billion.
Global Reinsurance
Typically, there is inherent uncertainty around the length of paid and reported development patterns, especially for certain casualty lines such as excess workers' compensation or general liability, which may take up to 30 years to fully develop.  This uncertainty is accentuated by the need to supplement client development patterns with industry development patterns due to the sometimes low credibility of the data. The underlying source and selection of the final development patterns can thus have a significant impact on the selected ultimate net losses and loss expenses. For example, a 20 percent shortening or lengthening of the development patterns used for U.S. long-tail lines would cause the loss reserve estimate derived by the reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson method for these lines to change by approximately $372 million. This represents an impact of 27.4 percent relative to recorded net loss and loss expense reserves of approximately $1.4 billion.

Assumed reinsurance
At December 31, 2012 , net unpaid losses and loss expenses for the Global Reinsurance segment aggregated to $2.4 billion, consisting of $930 million of case reserves and $1.5 billion of IBNR. In comparison, at December 31, 2011 , net unpaid losses and loss expenses for the Global Reinsurance segment aggregated to $2.5 billion, consisting of $886 million of case reserves and $1.6 billion of IBNR.

For catastrophe business, we principally estimate unpaid losses and loss expenses on an event basis by considering various sources of information, including specific loss estimates reported by our cedants, ceding company and overall industry loss estimates reported by our brokers, and our internal data regarding reinsured exposures related to the geographical location of the event. Our internal data analysis enables us to establish catastrophe reserves for known events with more certainty at an earlier date than would be the case if we solely relied on reports from third parties to determine carried reserves.
For our casualty reinsurance business, we generally rely on ceding companies to report claims and then use that data as a key input to estimate unpaid losses and loss expenses. Due to the reliance on claims information reported by ceding companies, as well as other factors, the estimation of unpaid losses and loss expenses for assumed reinsurance includes certain risks and uncertainties that are unique relative to our direct insurance business. These include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:
The reported claims information could be inaccurate;
Typically, a lag exists between the reporting of a loss event to a ceding company and its reporting to us as a reinsurance claim. The use of a broker to transmit financial information from a ceding company to us increases the reporting lag. Because most of our reinsurance business is produced by brokers, ceding companies generally first submit claim and other financial information to brokers, who then report the proportionate share of such information to each reinsurer of a particular treaty. The reporting lag generally results in a longer period of time between the date a claim is incurred and the date a claim is reported compared with direct insurance operations. Therefore, the risk of delayed recognition of loss reserve development is higher for assumed reinsurance than for direct insurance lines; and
The historical claims data for a particular reinsurance contract can be limited relative to our insurance business in that there may be less historical information available. Further, for certain coverages or products, such as excess of loss

50

Table of Contents

contracts, there may be relatively few expected claims in a particular year so the actual number of claims may be susceptible to significant variability. In such cases, the actuary often relies on industry data from several recognized sources.

We mitigate the above risks in several ways. In addition to routine analytical reviews of ceding company reports to ensure reported claims information appears reasonable, we perform regular underwriting and claims audits of certain ceding companies to ensure reported claims information is accurate, complete, and timely. As appropriate, audit findings are used to adjust claims in the reserving process. We also use our knowledge of the historical development of losses from individual ceding companies to adjust the level of adequacy we believe exists in the reported ceded losses.
On occasion, there will be differences between our carried loss reserves and unearned premium reserves and the amount of loss reserves and unearned premium reserves reported by the ceding companies.  This is due to the fact that we receive consistent and timely information from ceding companies only with respect to case reserves.  For IBNR, we use historical experience and other statistical information, depending on the type of business, to estimate the ultimate loss.  We estimate our unearned premium reserve by applying estimated earning patterns to net premiums written for each treaty based upon that treaty's coverage basis (i.e., risks attaching or losses occurring).  At December 31, 2012 , the case reserves reported to us by our ceding companies were $913 million, compared with the $930 million we recorded.  Our policy is to post additional case reserves in addition to the amounts reported by our cedants when our evaluation of the ultimate value of a reported claim is different than the evaluation of that claim by our cedant.
Within the Insurance – North American segment, we also have exposure to certain liability reinsurance lines that have been in run-off since 1994. Unpaid losses and loss expenses relating to this run-off reinsurance business resides within the Brandywine Division of our Insurance – North American segment. Most of the remaining unpaid loss and loss expense reserves for the run-off reinsurance business relate to A&E claims. Refer to the “Asbestos and Environmental (A&E) and other run-off liabilities” section for additional information.

Asbestos and environmental reserves
Included in our liabilities for losses and loss expenses are amounts for A&E (A&E liabilities). The A&E liabilities principally relate to claims arising from bodily-injury claims related to asbestos products and remediation costs associated with hazardous waste sites. The estimation of our A&E liabilities is particularly sensitive to future changes in the legal, social, and economic environment. We have not assumed any such future changes in setting the value of our A&E liabilities, which include provisions for both reported and IBNR claims.

During 2012 , we conducted our annual internal, ground-up review of our consolidated A&E liabilities as of December 31, 2011 . As a result of the internal review, we increased our gross loss reserves for the Brandywine operations, including A&E, by $275 million, while the net loss reserves increased by $146 million. In addition, we increased gross loss reserves for Westchester Specialty's A&E and other liabilities by $17 million, and net loss reserves increased by $4 million. Our A&E liabilities are not discounted for GAAP reporting and do not reflect any anticipated future changes in the legal, social or economic environment, or any benefit from future legislative reforms.

There are many complex variables that we consider when estimating the reserves for our inventory of asbestos accounts and these variables may directly impact the predicted outcome. We believe the most significant variables relating to our A&E liabilities include the current legal environment; specific settlements that may be used as precedents to settle future claims; assumptions regarding trends with respect to claim severity and the frequency of higher severity claims; assumptions regarding the ability to allocate liability among defendants (including bankruptcy trusts) and other insurers; the ability of a claimant to bring a claim in a state in which they have no residency or exposure; the ability of a policyholder to claim the right to unaggregated coverage; whether high-level excess policies have the potential to be accessed given the policyholder's claim trends and liability situation; payments to unimpaired claimants; and, the potential liability of peripheral defendants. Based on the policies, the facts, the law, and a careful analysis of the impact that these factors will likely have on any given account, we estimate the potential liability for indemnity, policyholder defense costs, and coverage litigation expense.
The results in asbestos cases announced by other carriers or defendants may well have little or no relevance to us because coverage exposures are highly dependent upon the specific facts of individual coverage and resolution status of disputes among carriers, policyholders, and claimants.
For additional information refer to the “Asbestos and Environmental (A&E) and Other Run-off Liabilities” section and to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

51

Table of Contents


Future policy benefits reserves
We issue contracts in our Insurance – Overseas General and Life segments that are classified as long-duration.  These contracts generally include accident and supplemental health products, term and whole life products, endowment products, and annuities.  In accordance with GAAP, we establish reserves for contracts determined to be long-duration based on approved actuarial methods that include assumptions related to expenses, mortality, morbidity, persistency, and investment yields with a factor for adverse deviation.  These assumptions are “locked in” at the inception of the contract, meaning we use our original assumptions throughout the life of the policy and do not subsequently modify them unless we deem the reserves to be inadequate.  The future policy benefits reserves balance is regularly evaluated for a premium deficiency.  If experience is less favorable than assumptions, additional liabilities may be required, resulting in a charge to policyholder benefits and claims.

Valuation of value of business acquired (VOBA) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and VOBA
As part of the acquisition of businesses that sell long-duration contracts, such as life products, we established an intangible asset related to VOBA, which represented the fair value of the future profits of the in-force contracts.  The valuation of VOBA at the time of acquisition is derived from similar assumptions to those used to establish the associated future policy benefits reserves.  The most significant input in this calculation is the discount rate used to arrive at the present value of the net cash flows.  We amortize deferred policy acquisition costs associated with long-duration contracts and VOBA (collectively policy acquisition costs) over the estimated life of the contracts, generally in proportion to premium revenue recognized. For non-traditional long duration contracts, we amortize policy acquisition costs over the expected life of the contracts in proportion to estimates of expected gross profits. The estimated life is established at the inception of the contracts or upon acquisition and is based on current persistency assumptions.  Policy acquisition costs, which consist of commissions, premium taxes, and certain underwriting costs related directly to the successful acquisition of a new or renewal insurance contract, are reviewed to determine if they are recoverable from future income, including investment income. Unrecoverable costs are expensed in the period identified.

Risk transfer
In the ordinary course of business, we both purchase (or cede) and sell (or assume) reinsurance protection. We discontinued the purchase of all finite reinsurance contracts, as a matter of policy, in 2002. For both ceded and assumed reinsurance, risk transfer requirements must be met in order to use reinsurance accounting, principally resulting in the recognition of cash flows under the contract as premiums and losses. If risk transfer requirements are not met, a contract is to be accounted for as a deposit, typically resulting in the recognition of cash flows under the contract through a deposit asset or liability and not as revenue or expense. To meet risk transfer requirements, a reinsurance contract must include both insurance risk, consisting of underwriting and timing risk, and a reasonable possibility of a significant loss for the assuming entity. We also apply similar risk transfer requirements to determine whether certain commercial insurance contracts should be accounted for as insurance or a deposit. Contracts that include fixed premium (i.e., premium not subject to adjustment based on loss experience under the contract) for fixed coverage generally transfer risk and do not require judgment.

Reinsurance and insurance contracts that include both significant risk sharing provisions, such as adjustments to premiums or loss coverage based on loss experience, and relatively low policy limits, as evidenced by a high proportion of maximum premium assessments to loss limits, can require considerable judgment to determine whether or not risk transfer requirements are met. For such contracts, often referred to as finite or structured products, we require that risk transfer be specifically assessed for each contract by developing expected cash flow analyses at contract inception. To support risk transfer, the cash flow analyses must demonstrate that a significant loss is reasonably possible, such as a scenario in which the ratio of the net present value of losses divided by the net present value of premiums equals or exceeds 110 percent. For purposes of cash flow analyses, we generally use a risk-free rate of return consistent with the expected average duration of loss payments. In addition, to support insurance risk, we must prove the reinsurer's risk of loss varies with that of the reinsured and/or support various scenarios under which the assuming entity can recognize a significant loss.

To ensure risk transfer requirements are routinely assessed, qualitative and quantitative risk transfer analyses and memoranda supporting risk transfer are developed by underwriters for all structured products. We have established protocols for structured products that include criteria triggering an accounting review of the contract prior to quoting. If any criterion is triggered, a contract must be reviewed by a committee established by each of our segments with reporting oversight, including peer review, from our global Structured Transaction Review Committee.

With respect to ceded reinsurance, we entered into a few multi-year excess of loss retrospectively-rated contracts, principally in 2002. These contracts primarily provided severity protection for specific product divisions. Because traditional one-year reinsurance coverage had become relatively costly, these contracts were generally entered in order to secure a more cost-

52

Table of Contents

effective reinsurance program. All of these contracts transferred risk and were accounted for as reinsurance. In addition, we maintain a few aggregate excess of loss reinsurance contracts that were principally entered into prior to 2003, such as the National Indemnity Company (NICO) contracts referred to in the section entitled, “Asbestos and Environmental (A&E) and Other Run-off Liabilities”. Subsequent to the ACE INA acquisition in 1999, we have not purchased any other retroactive ceded reinsurance contracts.

With respect to assumed reinsurance and insurance contracts, products giving rise to judgments regarding risk transfer were primarily sold by our financial solutions business. Although we have significantly curtailed writing financial solutions business, several contracts remain in-force and principally include multi-year retrospectively-rated contracts and loss portfolio transfers. Because transfer of insurance risk is generally a primary client motivation for purchasing these products, relatively few insurance and reinsurance contracts have historically been written for which we concluded that risk transfer criteria had not been met. For certain insurance contracts that have been reported as deposits, the insured desired to self-insure a risk but was required, legally or otherwise, to purchase insurance so that claimants would be protected by a licensed insurance company in the event of non-payment from the insured.

A significant portion of ACE Tempest Re USA's business is written through quota share treaties (approximately $474 million of net premiums earned in 2012 , comprising $408 million of first dollar quota share treaties and $66 million of excess quota share treaties), a small portion of which are categorized as structured products.  Structured quota share treaties typically contain relatively low aggregate policy limits, a feature that reduces loss coverage in some manner, and a profit sharing provision. These have been deemed to have met risk transfer requirements.

Reinsurance recoverable
Reinsurance recoverable includes the balances due to us from reinsurance companies for paid and unpaid losses and loss expenses and is presented net of a provision for uncollectible reinsurance. The provision for uncollectible reinsurance is determined based upon a review of the financial condition of the reinsurers and other factors. Ceded reinsurance contracts do not relieve our primary obligation to our policyholders. Consequently, an exposure exists with respect to reinsurance recoverable to the extent that any reinsurer is unable or unwilling to meet its obligations or disputes the liabilities assumed under the reinsurance contracts. We determine the reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses using actuarial estimates as well as a determination of our ability to cede unpaid losses and loss expenses under existing reinsurance contracts.

The recognition of a reinsurance recoverable asset requires two key judgments. The first judgment involves our estimation based on the amount of gross reserves and the percentage of that amount which may be ceded to reinsurers. Ceded IBNR, which is a major component of the reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses, is generally developed as part of our loss reserving process and, consequently, its estimation is subject to similar risks and uncertainties as the estimation of gross IBNR (refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates - Unpaid losses and loss expenses”). The second judgment involves our estimate of the amount of the reinsurance recoverable balance that we may ultimately be unable to recover from reinsurers due to insolvency, contractual dispute, or for other reasons. Amounts estimated to be uncollectible are reflected in a provision that reduces the reinsurance recoverable asset and, in turn, shareholders' equity. Changes in the provision for uncollectible reinsurance are reflected in net income.

Although the obligation of individual reinsurers to pay their reinsurance obligations is based on specific contract provisions, the collectability of such amounts requires estimation by management. The majority of the balance we have accrued as recoverable will not be due for collection until sometime in the future, and the duration of our recoverables may be longer than the duration of our direct exposures. Over this period of time, economic conditions and operational performance of a particular reinsurer may impact their ability to meet these obligations and while they may continue to acknowledge their contractual obligation to do so, they may not have the financial resources or willingness to fully meet their obligation to us.

To estimate the provision for uncollectible reinsurance, the reinsurance recoverable must first be determined for each reinsurer. This determination is based on a process rather than an estimate, although an element of judgment must be applied. As part of the process, ceded IBNR is allocated to reinsurance contracts because ceded IBNR is not generally calculated on a contract by contract basis. The allocations are generally based on premiums ceded under reinsurance contracts, adjusted for actual loss experience and historical relationships between gross and ceded losses. If actual premium and loss experience vary materially from historical experience, the allocation of reinsurance recoverable by reinsurer will change. While such change is unlikely to result in a large percentage change in the provision for uncollectible reinsurance, it could, nevertheless, have a material effect on our net income in the period recorded.


53

Table of Contents

Generally, we use a default analysis to estimate uncollectible reinsurance. The primary components of the default analysis are reinsurance recoverable balances by reinsurer, net of collateral, and default factors used to estimate the probability that the reinsurer may be unable to meet its future obligations in full. The definition of collateral for this purpose requires some judgment and is generally limited to assets held in an ACE-only beneficiary trust, letters of credit, and liabilities held by us with the same legal entity for which we believe there is a right of offset. We do not currently include multi-beneficiary trusts. However, we have several reinsurers that have established multi-beneficiary trusts for which certain of our companies are beneficiaries. The determination of the default factor is principally based on the financial strength rating of the reinsurer and a corresponding default factor applicable to the financial strength rating. Default factors require considerable judgment and are determined using the current financial strength rating, or rating equivalent, of each reinsurer as well as other key considerations and assumptions. Significant considerations and assumptions include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:
For reinsurers that maintain a financial strength rating from a major rating agency, and for which recoverable balances are considered representative of the larger population (i.e., default probabilities are consistent with similarly rated reinsurers and payment durations conform to averages), the judgment exercised by management to determine the provision for uncollectible reinsurance of each reinsurer is typically limited because the financial rating is based on a published source and the default factor we apply is based on a historical default factor of a major rating agency applicable to the particular rating class. Default factors applied for financial ratings of AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, and CCC, are 0.8 percent, 1.2 percent, 1.7 percent, 4.9 percent, 19.6 percent, 34.0 percent, and 62.2 percent, respectively. Because the model we use is predicated on the historical default factors of a major rating agency, we do not generally consider alternative factors. However, when a recoverable is expected to be paid in a brief period of time by a highly-rated reinsurer, such as certain property catastrophe claims, a default factor may not be applied;
For balances recoverable from reinsurers that are both unrated by a major rating agency and for which management is unable to determine a credible rating equivalent based on a parent or affiliated company, we may determine a rating equivalent based on our analysis of the reinsurer that considers an assessment of the creditworthiness of the particular entity, industry benchmarks, or other factors as considered appropriate. We then apply the applicable default factor for that rating class. For balances recoverable from unrated reinsurers for which our ceded reserve is below a certain threshold, we generally apply a default factor of 34.0 percent;
For balances recoverable from reinsurers that are either insolvent or under regulatory supervision, we establish a default factor and resulting provision for uncollectible reinsurance based on specific facts and circumstances surrounding each company. Upon initial notification of an insolvency, we generally recognize expense for a substantial portion of all balances outstanding, net of collateral, through a combination of write-offs of recoverable balances and increases to the provision for uncollectible reinsurance. When regulatory action is taken on a reinsurer, we generally recognize a default factor by estimating an expected recovery on all balances outstanding, net of collateral. When sufficient credible information becomes available, we adjust the provision for uncollectible reinsurance by establishing a default factor pursuant to information received; and
For captives and other recoverables, management determines the provision for uncollectible reinsurance based on the specific facts and circumstances.

The following table summarizes reinsurance recoverables and the provision for uncollectible reinsurance for each type of recoverable balance at December 31, 2012 :
 
 
 
Gross Reinsurance Recoverables on Losses and Loss Expenses

 
Recoverables (net of Usable Collateral)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for Uncollectible Reinsurance

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Type
 
 
Reinsurers with credit ratings
 
 
$
9,408

 
$
8,431

 
$
225

Reinsurers not rated
 
 
243

 
203

 
67

Reinsurers under supervision and insolvent reinsurers
 
 
122

 
106

 
78

Captives
 
 
1,762

 
295

 
14

Other - structured settlements and pools
 
 
982

 
981

 
55

Total
 
 
$
12,517

 
$
10,016

 
$
439


At December 31, 2012 , the use of different assumptions within our approach could have a material effect on the provision for uncollectible reinsurance reflected in our consolidated financial statements. To the extent the creditworthiness of our reinsurers

54

Table of Contents

were to deteriorate due to an adverse event affecting the reinsurance industry, such as a large number of major catastrophes, actual uncollectible amounts could be significantly greater than our provision for uncollectible reinsurance. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and our liquidity. Given the various considerations used to estimate our uncollectible provision, we cannot precisely quantify the effect a specific industry event may have on the provision for uncollectible reinsurance. However, based on the composition (particularly the average credit quality) of the reinsurance recoverable balance at December 31, 2012 , we estimate that a ratings downgrade of one notch for all rated reinsurers (i.e., from A to A- or A- to BBB+) could increase our provision for uncollectible reinsurance by approximately $68 million or approximately 0.5 percent of the gross reinsurance recoverable balance, assuming no other changes relevant to the calculation. While a ratings downgrade would result in an increase in our provision for uncollectible reinsurance and a charge to earnings in that period, a downgrade in and of itself does not imply that we will be unable to collect all of the ceded reinsurance recoverable from the reinsurers in question. Refer to Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI)
Each quarter, we review our securities in an unrealized loss position (impaired securities), including fixed maturities, securities lending collateral, equity securities, and other investments, to identify those impaired securities to be specifically evaluated for a potential OTTI. Because our investment portfolio is the largest component of consolidated assets and a multiple of shareholders' equity, OTTI could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Note 3 d) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the process by which we evaluate investments for OTTI.

Deferred tax assets
Many of our insurance businesses operate in income tax-paying jurisdictions. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily result from temporary differences between the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities.  We determine deferred tax assets and liabilities separately for each tax-paying component (an individual entity or group of entities that is consolidated for tax purposes) in each tax jurisdiction. The realization of deferred tax assets depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law in the applicable tax jurisdiction.

At December 31, 2012 , our net deferred tax asset was $ 453 million. Refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.  At each balance sheet date, management assesses the need to establish a valuation allowance that reduces deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all, or some portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The valuation allowance is based on all available information including projections of future taxable income from each tax-paying component in each tax jurisdiction, principally derived from business plans and available tax planning strategies.  Projections of future taxable income incorporate several assumptions of future business and operations that are apt to differ from actual experience. The valuation allowance is also based on maintaining our ability and intent to hold our U.S. available for sale fixed maturities to recovery. If, in the future, our assumptions and estimates that resulted in our forecast of future taxable income for each tax-paying component prove to be incorrect, or future market events occur that prevent our ability to hold our U.S. fixed maturities to recovery, an additional valuation allowance could become necessary.  This could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.  At December 31, 2012, the valuation allowance of $56 million (including $24 million with respect to foreign tax credits) reflects management's assessment that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized due to the inability of certain foreign subsidiaries to generate sufficient taxable income and the inability of ACE Group Holdings and its subsidiaries to utilize foreign tax credits.

Fair value measurements
The accounting guidance on fair value measurements defines fair value as the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy in which inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value are classified.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable data (Level 3 inputs). Inputs in Level 1 are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 includes inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for assets or liabilities either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include, among other items, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as interest rates and yield curves. Level 3 inputs are unobservable and reflect our judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

55

Table of Contents

We categorize financial instruments within the valuation hierarchy at the balance sheet date based upon the lowest level of inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement. Accordingly, transfers between levels within the valuation hierarchy occur when there are significant changes to the inputs, such as increases or decreases in market activity, changes to the availability of current prices, changes to the transparency to underlying inputs, and whether there are significant variances in quoted prices. Transfers in and/or out of any level are assumed to occur at the end of the period.
While we obtain values for the majority of the investment securities we hold from one or more pricing services, it is ultimately management’s responsibility to determine whether the values obtained and recorded in the financial statements are representative of fair value. We periodically update our understanding of the methodologies used by our pricing services in order to validate that the prices obtained from those services are consistent with the GAAP definition of fair value as an exit price. Based on our understanding of the methodologies, our pricing services only produce an estimate of fair value if there is observable market information that would allow them to make a fair value estimate. Based on our understanding of the market inputs used by our pricing services, all applicable investments have been valued in accordance with GAAP valuation principles. We have controls to review significant price changes and stale pricing, and to ensure that prices received from pricing services have been accurately reflected in the consolidated financial statements. We do not typically adjust prices obtained from pricing services.
Additionally, the valuation of fixed maturities is more subjective when markets are less liquid due to the lack of market based inputs (i.e., stale pricing), which may increase the potential that the estimated fair value of an investment is not reflective of the price at which an actual transaction would occur. For a small number of fixed maturities, we obtain a quote from a broker (typically a market maker). Due to the disclaimers on the quotes that indicate that the price is indicative only, we include these fair value estimates in Level 3.
At December 31, 2012 , Level 3 assets represented four percent of assets that are measured at fair value and three percent of total assets. Level 3 liabilities represented 100 percent of liabilities that are measured at fair value and two percent of our total liabilities. During 2012 , we transferred assets of $ 164 million into our Level 3 assets from other levels of the valuation hierarchy. During 2012 , we transferred assets of $ 110 million out of our Level 3 assets to other levels of the valuation hierarchy. Refer to Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the valuation techniques and inputs used to determine fair values for our financial instruments measured or disclosed at fair value by valuation hierarchy (Levels 1, 2, and 3) as well as a roll-forward of Level 3 financial instruments measured at fair value for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 .

Guaranteed living benefits (GLB) derivatives
Under life reinsurance programs covering living benefit guarantees, we assumed the risk of GLBs associated with variable annuity (VA) contracts. We ceased writing this business in 2007. Our GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative for accounting purposes and is therefore carried at fair value. We believe that the most meaningful presentation of these derivatives is to reflect cash inflows or revenue as net premiums earned, and to record estimates of the average modeled value of future cash outflows as incurred losses. Accordingly, we recognize benefit reserves consistent with the accounting guidance related to accounting and reporting by insurance enterprises for certain non-traditional long-duration contracts and for separate accounts. Changes in the benefit reserves are reflected as Policy benefits expense, which is included in life underwriting income. The incremental difference between fair value and benefit reserves is reflected in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and related changes in fair value are reflected in Net realized gains (losses) in the consolidated statement of operations. We intend to hold these derivative contracts to maturity (i.e., the expiration of the underlying liabilities through lapse, annuitization, death, or expiration of the reinsurance contract). To partially offset the risk in the VA guarantee reinsurance portfolio, we invest in derivative hedge instruments. At maturity, the cumulative gains and losses will net to zero (excluding cumulative hedge gains or losses) because, over time, the insurance liability will be increased or decreased to equal our obligation. For a sensitivity discussion of the effect of changes in interest rates, equity indices, and other assumptions on the fair value of GLBs, and the resulting impact on our net income, refer to Item 7A. For further description of this product and related accounting treatment, refer to Note 1 j) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The fair value of GLB reinsurance is estimated using an internal valuation model, which includes current market information and estimates of policyholder behavior from the perspective of a theoretical market participant that would assume these liabilities. All of our treaties contain claim limits, which are factored into the valuation model. The fair value depends on a number of factors, including interest rates, current account value, market volatility, expected annuitization rates and other policyholder behavior, and changes in policyholder mortality. The model and related assumptions are continuously re-evaluated by management and enhanced, as appropriate, based upon additional experience obtained related to policyholder behavior and availability of more timely market information, such as market conditions and demographics of in-force annuities. Due to the

56

Table of Contents

inherent uncertainties of the assumptions used in the valuation models to determine the fair value of these derivative products, actual experience may differ from the estimates reflected in our consolidated financial statements, and the differences may be material.
The most significant policyholder behavior assumptions include lapse rates and the guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB) annuitization rates. Assumptions regarding lapse rates and GMIB annuitization rates differ by treaty but the underlying methodologies to determine rates applied to each treaty are comparable. The assumptions regarding lapse and GMIB annuitization rates determined for each treaty are based on a dynamic calculation that uses several underlying factors.
A lapse rate is the percentage of in-force policies surrendered in a given calendar year. All else equal, as lapse rates increase, ultimate claim payments will decrease. Key factors affecting the lapse rate assumption include investment performance and policy duration. In general, the base lapse function assumes low lapse rates (ranging from about 1 percent to 6 percent per annum) during the surrender charge period of the variable annuity contract, followed by a “spike” lapse rate (ranging from about 10 percent to 30 percent per annum) in the year immediately following the surrender charge period, and then reverting to an ultimate lapse rate (generally around 10 percent per annum), typically over a 2 -year period. This base rate is adjusted downward for policies with more valuable (more “in the money”) guarantees by multiplying the base lapse rate by a factor ranging from 15 percent to 75 percent. Additional lapses due to partial withdrawals and older policyholders with tax-qualified contracts (due to required minimum distributions) are also included.
The GMIB annuitization rate is the percentage of policies for which the policyholder will elect to annuitize using the guaranteed benefit provided under the GMIB. All else equal, as GMIB annuitization rates increase, ultimate claim payments will increase, subject to treaty claim limits. Key factors affecting the GMIB annuitization rate include investment performance and the level of interest rates after the GMIB waiting period, since these factors determine the value of the guarantee to the policyholder. In general, we assume that GMIB annuitization rates will be higher for policies with more valuable (more “in the money”) guarantees. In addition, we also assume that GMIB annuitization rates are higher in the first year immediately following the waiting period (the first year the policies are eligible to annuitize utilizing the GMIB) in comparison to all subsequent years. We do not yet have a robust set of annuitization experience because most of our clients’ policyholders are not yet eligible to annuitize utilizing the GMIB. However, for certain clients representing approximately 36 percent of the total GMIB guaranteed value there are several years of annuitization experience – for those clients the annuitization function reflects the actual experience and has a maximum annuitization rate per annum of 8 percent (a higher maximum applies in the first year a policy is eligible to annuitize utilizing the GMIB – it is over 13 percent). For most clients there is not a credible amount of observable relevant behavior data and so we use a weighted average (with a heavier weighting on the observed experience noted previously) of three different annuitization functions with maximum annuitization rates per annum of 8 percent, 12 percent, and 30 percent, respectively (with significantly higher rates in the first year a policy is eligible to annuitize utilizing the GMIB). As noted elsewhere, our GMIB reinsurance treaties include claim limits to protect us in the event that actual annuitization behavior is significantly higher than expected.
Based on our 2012 review, no material changes were made to actuarial or behavioral assumptions. We made minor technical refinements to the model with a favorable net income impact of approximately $49 million.
During 2012 , realized gains of $ 200 million were associated with a decreased value of GLB liabilities primarily due to rising equity levels partially offset by the unfavorable impact of interest rate movements and the impact of discounting future claims for one fewer year. This excludes realized losses of $ 297 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 on derivative hedge instruments held to partially offset the risk in the VA guarantee reinsurance portfolio. These derivatives do not receive hedge accounting treatment. Refer to the “Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)” section for a breakdown of the realized gains (losses) on GLB reinsurance and derivatives for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 .
ACE Tempest Life Re employs a strategy to manage the financial market and policyholder behavior risks embedded in the reinsurance of VA guarantees. Risk management begins with underwriting a prospective client and guarantee design, with particular focus on protecting our position from policyholder options that, because of anti-selective behavior, could adversely impact our obligation.
A second layer of risk management is the structure of the reinsurance contracts. All VA guarantee reinsurance contracts include some form of annual or aggregate claim limit(s). The different categories of claim limits are described below:
Reinsurance programs covering guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB) with an annual claim limit of two percent of account value. This category accounts for approximately 60 percent of the total reinsured GMDB guaranteed value. Approximately one percent of the guaranteed value in this category has additional reinsurance coverage for GLB.

57

Table of Contents

Reinsurance programs covering GMDB with claim limit(s) that are a function of the underlying guaranteed value. This category accounts for approximately 25 percent of the total reinsured GMDB guaranteed value. The annual claim limit expressed as a percentage of guaranteed value ranges from 0.4 percent to 2 percent. Approximately 70 percent of guaranteed value in this category is also subject to annual claim deductibles that range from 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent of guaranteed value (i.e., our reinsurance coverage would only pay total annual claims in excess of 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent of the total guaranteed value). Approximately 50 percent of guaranteed value in this category is also subject to an aggregate claim limit which was approximately $ 380 million as of December 31, 2012 . Approximately 75 percent of guaranteed value in this category has additional reinsurance coverage for GLB.
Reinsurance programs covering GMDB and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMAB). This category accounts for approximately 15 percent of the total reinsured GLB guaranteed value and 15 percent of the total reinsured GMDB guaranteed value. These reinsurance programs are quota-share agreements with the quota-share decreasing as the ratio of account value to guaranteed value decreases. The quota-share is 100 percent for ratios between 100 percent and 75 percent, 60 percent for additional losses on ratios between 75 percent and 45 percent, and 30 percent for further losses on ratios below 45 percent. Approximately 35 percent of guaranteed value in this category is also subject to a claim deductible of 8.8 percent of guaranteed value (i.e., our reinsurance coverage would only pay when the ratio of account value to guaranteed value is below 91.2 percent).
Reinsurance programs covering GMIB with an annual claim limit. This category accounts for approximately 50 percent of the total reinsured GLB guaranteed value. The annual claim limit is 10 percent of guaranteed value on over 95 percent of the guaranteed value in this category. Additionally, reinsurance programs in this category have an annual annuitization limit that ranges between 17.5 percent and 30 percent with approximately 40 percent of guaranteed value subject to an annuitization limit of 20 percent or under, and the remaining 60 percent subject to an annuitization limit of 30 percent. Approximately 40 percent of guaranteed value in this category is also subject to minimum annuity conversion factors that limit the exposure to low interest rates. Approximately 40 percent of guaranteed value in this category has additional reinsurance coverage for GMDB.
Reinsurance programs covering GMIB with aggregate claim limit. This category accounts for approximately 35 percent of the total reinsured GLB guaranteed value. The aggregate claim limit for reinsurance programs in this category is approximately $ 1.9 billion. Additionally, reinsurance programs in this category have an annual annuitization limit of 20 percent and approximately 55 percent of guaranteed value in this category is also subject to minimum annuity conversion factors that limit the exposure to low interest rates. Approximately 45 percent of guaranteed value in this category has additional reinsurance coverage for GMDB.
A third layer of risk management is the hedging strategy which looks to mitigate both long-term economic loss over time as well as dampen income statement volatility. ACE Tempest Life Re owned financial market instruments as part of the hedging strategy with a fair value of $24 million and $38 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The instruments are substantially collateralized by our counterparties, on a daily basis.
We also limit the aggregate amount of variable annuity reinsurance guarantee risk we are willing to assume. The last substantive U.S. transaction was quoted in mid-2007 and the last transaction in Japan was quoted in late 2007. The aggregate number of policyholders is currently decreasing through policyholder withdrawals, annuitizations, and deaths at a rate of 5 percent - 10 percent annually.

58

Table of Contents

Note that GLB claims cannot occur for any reinsured policy until it has reached the end of its “waiting period”. The vast majority of policies we reinsure reach the end of their “waiting periods” in 2013 or later, as shown in the table below.
Year of first payment eligibility
Percent of living benefit
account values

2012 and prior
7
%
2013
23
%
2014
18
%
2015
5
%
2016
5
%
2017
19
%
2018
16
%
2019 and after
7
%
Total
100
%
The following table presents the historical cash flows under these policies for the periods indicated. The amounts represent accrued past premium received and claims paid, split by benefit type.
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
2012

 
2011

Death Benefits (GMDB)
 
 
 
 
Premium
 
$
85

 
$
98

Less paid claims
 
100

 
114

Net
 
$
(15
)
 
$
(16
)
Living Benefits (Includes GMIB and GMAB)
 
 
 
 
Premium
 
$
160

 
$
165

Less paid claims
 
11

 
4

Net
 
$
149

 
$
161

Total VA Guaranteed Benefits
 
 
 
 
Premium
 
$
245

 
$
263

Less paid claims
 
111

 
118

Net
 
$
134

 
$
145

Death Benefits (GMDB)
For premiums and claims from VA contracts reinsuring GMDBs, at current market levels, we expect approximately $ 91 million of claims and $ 74 million of premium on death benefits over the next 12 months.
GLB (includes GMIB and GMAB)
Our GLBs predominantly include premiums and claims from VA contracts reinsuring GMIB and GMAB. More than 90 percent of our living benefit reinsurance clients’ policyholders are currently ineligible to trigger a claim payment. The vast majority of these policyholders become eligible between years 2013 and 2018. At current market levels, we expect approximately $25 million of claims and $149 million of premium on living benefits over the next 12 months.
Collateral
ACE Tempest Life Re holds collateral on behalf of most of its clients in the form of qualified assets in trust or letters of credit, typically in an amount sufficient for the client to obtain statutory reserve credit for the reinsurance.  The timing of the calculation and amount of the collateral varies by client according to the particulars of the reinsurance treaty and the statutory reserve guidelines of the client's domicile.


59

Table of Contents

Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill, which represents the excess of acquisition cost over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired, was $ 4.3 billion and $ 4.1 billion at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively. During 2012 , our goodwill balance increased by approximately four percent , primarily due to acquisitions. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to a periodic evaluation for impairment at least annually, or earlier if there are any indications of possible impairment. The impairment evaluation first uses a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (i.e., more than a 50 percent probability) that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. If a reporting unit fails this qualitative assessment, a quantitative analysis is then used. The quantitative analysis is a two-step process in which an initial assessment for potential impairment is performed and, if a potential impairment is present, the amount of impairment is measured and recorded. Impairment is tested at the reporting unit level. Goodwill is assigned to applicable reporting units of acquired entities at acquisition. The most significant reporting units are:

New York Life's Korea operations and Hong Kong operations acquired in 2011;
Rain and Hail Insurance Service, Inc. (Rain and Hail) acquired in 2010;
North American and International divisions of Combined Insurance acquired in 2008;
Domestic and International divisions of ACE INA acquired in 1999; and
ACE Tempest Re's catastrophe businesses acquired in 1996 and 1998.

There are other reporting units that resulted from smaller acquisitions that are also assessed annually. A quantitative goodwill impairment analysis was prepared in 2012 for the North American division of Combined Insurance with a goodwill balance of $738 million. Based on our impairment testing for 2012 , we determined that no impairment was required and that none of our reporting units were at risk for impairment.

To estimate the fair value of a reporting unit, we consistently applied a combination of the following models: an earnings multiple, a book value multiple, a discounted cash flow or an allocated market capitalization. The earnings and book value models apply multiples, including the consideration of a control premium, of comparable publicly traded companies to forecasted earnings or book value of each reporting unit and consider current market transactions. The discounted cash flow model applies a discount to estimated cash flows including a terminal value calculation. The market capitalization model applies a control premium to our market capitalization and, as adjusted, compares the allocated market capitalization to the allocated book value of each reporting unit.

To determine an appropriate control premium, we considered both the mean and range of control premiums paid in our industry for recent transactions involving businesses similar to our reporting units. We then selected a control premium within the range appropriate to our business.

We must assess whether the current fair value of our reporting units is at least equal to the fair value used in the determination of goodwill. In doing this, we make assumptions and estimates about the profitability attributable to our reporting units, including:

short-term and long-term growth rates;
estimated cost of equity and changes in long-term risk-free interest rates;
selection of appropriate earnings and book value market multiples to be used in various multiple approaches; and
risk premium applied in determining discount rate for calculating net present value of estimated future cash flows.

If our assumptions and estimates made in assessing the fair value of acquired entities change in the future, goodwill could be materially adjusted. This would cause us to write-down the carrying value of goodwill which could be material to our results of operations in the period the charge is taken.


60

Table of Contents

Consolidated Operating Results – Years Ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Net premiums written
$
16,075

 
$
15,372

 
$
13,708

 
4.6
 %
 
12.1
 %
Net premiums earned
15,677

 
15,387

 
13,504

 
1.9
 %
 
13.9
 %
Net investment income
2,181

 
2,242

 
2,070

 
(2.8
)%
 
8.3
 %
Net realized gains (losses)
78

 
(795
)
 
432

 
NM

 
NM

Total revenues
17,936

 
16,834

 
16,006

 
6.5
 %
 
5.2
 %
Losses and loss expenses
9,653

 
9,520

 
7,579

 
1.4
 %
 
25.6
 %
Policy benefits
521

 
401

 
357

 
29.9
 %
 
12.3
 %
Policy acquisition costs
2,446

 
2,472

 
2,345

 
(1.1
)%
 
5.4
 %
Administrative expenses
2,096

 
2,068

 
1,873

 
1.4
 %
 
10.4
 %
Interest expense
250

 
250

 
224

 

 
11.6
 %
Other (income) expense
(6
)
 
81

 
(10
)
 
NM

 
NM

Total expenses
14,960

 
14,792

 
12,368

 
1.1
 %
 
19.6
 %
Income before income tax
2,976

 
2,042

 
3,638

 
45.7
 %
 
(43.9
)%
Income tax expense
270

 
502

 
553

 
(46.2
)%
 
(9.2
)%
Net income
$
2,706

 
$
1,540

 
$
3,085

 
75.6
 %
 
(50.1
)%
NM – not meaningful
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table presents, by major product line, the approximate effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the growth of net premiums written and earned for the periods indicated:
 
2012
 
 
2011

 
2010

 
P&C

 
Life

 
A&H

 
Total

 
Total

 
Total

Net premiums written:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Growth in original currency
6.7
 %
 
7.6
 %
 
3.6
 %
 
6.0
 %
 
10.0
%
 
1.7
%
Foreign exchange effect
(1.2
)%
 
(2.0
)%
 
(2.3
)%
 
(1.4
)%
 
2.1
%
 
1.4
%
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
5.5
 %
 
5.6
 %
 
1.3
 %
 
4.6
 %
 
12.1
%
 
3.1
%
Net premiums earned:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Growth in original currency
3.2
 %
 
7.7
 %
 
3.2
 %
 
3.4
 %
 
11.4
%
 
0.7
%
Foreign exchange effect
(1.3
)%
 
(2.0
)%
 
(2.4
)%
 
(1.5
)%
 
2.5
%
 
1.3
%
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
1.9
 %
 
5.7
 %
 
0.8
 %
 
1.9
 %
 
13.9
%
 
2.0
%

The following table presents a breakdown of consolidated net premiums written for the periods indicated:
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Retail P&C
$
6,917

 
$
6,255

 
$
6,533

 
10.6
 %
 
(4.3
)%
Wholesale
3,633

 
3,735

 
2,212

 
(2.7
)%
 
68.9
 %
Reinsurance
1,025

 
979

 
1,075

 
4.7
 %
 
(8.9
)%
Property, casualty and all other
11,575

 
10,969

 
9,820

 
5.5
 %
 
11.7
 %
Personal accident (A&H)
3,532

 
3,486

 
3,255

 
1.3
 %
 
7.1
 %
Life
968

 
917

 
633

 
5.6
 %
 
44.9
 %
   Total consolidated
$
16,075

 
$
15,372

 
$
13,708

 
4.6
 %
 
12.1
 %

Net premiums written reflect the premiums we retain after purchasing reinsurance protection. Net premiums written increased in 2012 in our Insurance – North American segment retail division reflecting rate increases in most lines, strong renewal retention, and new business. In addition, there was good growth in many lines of business which include our risk

61

Table of Contents

management and personal lines businesses. This growth was partially offset by lower premiums in certain casualty and program business from adherence to our underwriting standards; in particular, we continued our planned reduction in our U.S. general market workers' compensation business. Net premiums written in our wholesale and specialty division decreased in 2012 primarily as a result of lower crop-hail production in our agriculture business. However, we experienced growth in many excess and surplus property, casualty, and professional lines where we benefited from rate increases, strong renewal retention, and new business. In addition, we also experienced growth in farm and agricultural property from the November 2011 acquisition of Penn Millers. Net premiums written increased in 2012 in our Insurance – Overseas General segment from growth in our retail operations in all of our major product lines - P&C, A&H and personal lines. Growth in our P&C and A&H lines was primarily driven by strong results in both Latin America and Asia. In addition, P&C growth benefited from the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in 2011. New business opportunities in Latin America, Asia, and Europe drove the growth in personal lines. Growth in net premiums written for 2012 was adversely impacted by foreign exchange. Net premiums written increased in 2012 in our Life segment primarily due to growth in our Asian markets. Net premiums written increased in 2012 in our Global Reinsurance segment primarily due to treaty business written in the year, improved pricing conditions in our property catastrophe business, and growth in our U.S. automobile business. This growth was partially offset by lower production in the first quarter of 2012 from competitive market conditions, adherence to underwriting standards, and an LPT treaty written in 2011.

Net premiums written increased in 2011 primarily from significant premium growth in our North American wholesale and specialty division from the acquisition of Rain and Hail in December 2010. Our North American retail division reported less net premiums written due to lower production across several lines of business reflecting competitive market conditions and adherence to our underwriting standards as well as less assumed loss portfolio business. Our international retail business reported growth, partially offset by reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with first quarter 2011 catastrophe activity. Our Global Reinsurance operations reported a decline in net premiums written in 2011 primarily due to competitive market conditions and lower exposures. The Life segment reported an increase in net premiums written due primarily to the acquisition of New York Life's Korea operations and Hong Kong operations in 2011.

Net premiums earned reflect the portion of net premiums written that were recorded as revenues for the period as the exposure periods expire. Net premiums earned increased in 2012 in our Insurance – Overseas General segment driven by strong performances in our retail operations in Latin America and Asia, as well as the favorable impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in 2011. This result was partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange. Net premiums earned increased in 2012 in the Insurance – North American retail division from our commercial and A&H lines of business along with growth in our personal lines business from continued expansion of the ACE Private Risk Services product offerings. This growth was partially offset by our continued planned reduction of our U.S. general market workers' compensation business. The Insurance – North American wholesale and specialty division generated lower net premiums earned in 2012 primarily as a result of lower crop-hail production in our agriculture business. Net premiums earned increased in 2012 in our Life segment primarily due to growth in our Asian markets. Net premiums earned were flat in our Global Reinsurance segment in 2012.

Net premiums earned increased in 2011 primarily due to increases in net premiums earned in our Insurance – North American agriculture, A&H business, and International retail businesses, partially offset by less assumed LPT business and lower production within our Global Reinsurance segment and declines in our London wholesale business due to pricing.


62

Table of Contents

The following table presents a breakdown of consolidated net premiums earned by line of business for the periods indicated:
 
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Property and all other
$
4,101

 
$
3,770

 
$
3,500

 
8.8
 %
 
7.7
 %
Agriculture
1,872

 
1,942

 
398

 
(3.6
)%
 
387.9
 %
Casualty
5,292

 
5,340

 
5,752

 
(0.9
)%
 
(7.2
)%
Subtotal
11,265

 
11,052

 
9,650

 
1.9
 %
 
14.5
 %
Personal accident (A&H)
3,499

 
3,471

 
3,243

 
0.8
 %
 
7.0
 %
Life
913

 
864

 
611

 
5.7
 %
 
41.4
 %
Net premiums earned
$
15,677

 
$
15,387

 
$
13,504

 
1.9
 %
 
13.9
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
% of  total

 
2011
% of  total

 
2010
% of  total

Property and all other
 
 
 
 
26
%
 
24
 %
 
26
 %
Agriculture
 
 
 
 
12
%
 
13
 %
 
3
 %
Casualty
 
 
 
 
34
%
 
35
 %
 
43
 %
Subtotal
 
 
 
 
72
%
 
72
 %
 
72
 %
Personal accident (A&H)
 
 
 
 
22
%
 
23
 %
 
24
 %
Life
 
 
 
 
6
%
 
5
 %
 
4
 %
Net premiums earned
 
 
 
 
100
%
 
100
 %
 
100
 %

Net investment income decreased in 2012 primarily due to lower reinvestment rates, higher investment expenses, and the negative impact of foreign exchange, partially offset by positive operating cash flows, higher private equity fund distributions, and the income benefit of an insurance contract classified as a deposit. Net investment income increased in 2011 primarily due to positive operating cash flows and the impact of acquisitions which have resulted in a higher overall average invested asset base, partially offset by lower yields on new investments and short-term securities. Refer to “Net Investment Income” and “Investments” for additional information.
In evaluating our segments excluding Life, we use the combined ratio, the loss and loss expense ratio, the policy acquisition cost ratio, and the administrative expense ratio. We calculate these ratios by dividing the respective expense amounts by net premiums earned. We do not calculate these ratios for the Life segment as we do not use these measures to monitor or manage that segment. The combined ratio is determined by adding the loss and loss expense ratio, the policy acquisition cost ratio, and the administrative expense ratio. A combined ratio under 100 percent indicates underwriting income and a combined ratio exceeding 100 percent indicates underwriting loss.
The following table presents our calendar year consolidated loss and loss expense ratio, policy acquisition cost ratio, administrative expense ratio, and combined ratio for the periods indicated:
 
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
Loss and loss expense ratio
65.7
%
 
66.0
%
 
59.4
%
 
Policy acquisition cost ratio
15.3
%
 
15.8
%
 
17.2
%
 
Administrative expense ratio
12.9
%
 
12.9
%
 
13.7
%
 
Combined ratio
93.9
%
 
94.7
%
 
90.3
%
 

The following table presents the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and the impact of prior period reserve development on our consolidated loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated:
 
 
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Loss and loss expense ratio, as reported
65.7
 %
 
66.0
 %
 
59.4
 %
Catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums
(4.6
)%
 
(6.5
)%
 
(3.2
)%
Prior period development
3.5
 %
 
4.1
 %
 
4.6
 %
Large assumed loss portfolio transfers

 

 
(0.3
)%
Loss and loss expense ratio, adjusted
64.6
 %
 
63.6
 %
 
60.5
 %


63

Table of Contents

The table below presents the impact of the catastrophe losses by segment:
Catastrophe Loss Charges - Full Year 2012
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Insurance – North American

 
Insurance – Overseas General

 
Global Reinsurance

 
Total

Net loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Superstorm Sandy
$
338

 
$
62

 
$
94

 
$
494

U.S. weather-related events
71

 
2

 

 
73

Hurricane Isaac
19

 
4

 
4

 
27

Other events throughout the year
13

 
8

 
18

 
39

Total
$
441

 
$
76

 
$
116

 
$
633

Reinstatement premiums (earned) expensed
8

 
8

 
(11
)
 
5

Total before income tax
$
449

 
$
84

 
$
105

 
$
638


Total net pre-tax catastrophe losses, excluding reinstatement premiums, were $ 633 million in 2012, compared with $859 million in 2011 and $366 million in 2010. Catastrophe losses in 2012 were primarily from Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Isaac, other severe weather-related events in the U.S. and Canada, and flooding in the U.K. Catastrophe losses in 2011 were primarily from earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand, flooding in Thailand, storms in Australia, and other severe weather-related events in the U.S. including Hurricane Irene. Catastrophe losses in 2010 were primarily from weather-related events in the U.S., earthquakes in Mexico and New Zealand, and storms in Australia and Europe.

Prior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premium from previous accident years. We experienced $ 479 million of net favorable prior period development in 2012, which includes an A&E charge of $140 million, compared with net favorable prior period development of $ 556 million and $503 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Refer to “Prior Period Development” for additional information.

Policy acquisition costs consist of commissions, premium taxes, and certain underwriting costs related directly to the successful acquisition of a new or renewal insurance contract. Administrative expenses include all other operating costs. Our policy acquisition cost ratio decreased in 2012 primarily due to lower profit sharing commission expenses in our agriculture business reflecting high losses in the crop insurance business in our Insurance – North American segment and from a favorable change in the mix of business in our Insurance – Overseas General segment. This favorable impact was offset by growth in certain businesses, including personal lines and A&H that carry a higher acquisition rate than our other businesses. Our policy acquisition cost ratio decreased in 2011 reflecting a shift in the mix of business towards lower acquisition cost lines of business, primarily agriculture, offset by changes in the mix of business and the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed, mainly within the Insurance – Overseas General segment.

Our administrative expense ratio was flat in 2012 as the increase in spending to support growth, primarily in our Insurance – North American segment and our Latin America and Asia regions within our Insurance – Overseas General segment, was offset by lower regulatory costs for Combined in the U.K. and Ireland. Our administrative expense ratio decreased in 2011 primarily due to the growth of low expense ratio business generated by agriculture partially offset by the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed and less assumed loss portfolio business which typically generate minimal expenses.

Our effective income tax rate, which we calculate as income tax expense divided by income before income tax, is dependent upon the mix of earnings from different jurisdictions with various tax rates. A change in the geographic mix of earnings would change the effective income tax rate. Our effective income tax rate was 9.1 percent in 2012, compared with 24.6 percent and 15.2 percent in 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2012 was due to a favorable resolution of various prior years' tax matters and the closing of statutes of limitations of $124 million, a higher percentage of earnings generated in lower tax-paying jurisdictions, and a decrease in the amount of net realized losses on derivatives generated in lower tax-paying jurisdictions. The increase in our effective income tax rate in 2011 was primarily due to a higher percentage of net realized losses being generated in lower tax-paying jurisdictions. The 2010 year included a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits resulting from a settlement with the Internal Revenue Service regarding federal tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004, and the recognition of a non-taxable gain related to the acquisition of Rain and Hail.


64

Table of Contents

Prior Period Development
The favorable prior period development of $479 million during 2012 , was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements. In the sections following the tables below, significant prior period movements within each reporting segment are discussed in more detail. Long-tail lines include lines such as workers’ compensation, general liability, and professional liability; while short-tail lines include lines such as most property lines, energy, personal accident, aviation, and marine (including associated liability-related exposures).
The following table presents (favorable) and adverse prior period development by segment for the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
Long-tail    

 
Short-tail    

 
Total

 
% of net unpaid
reserves (1)

2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insurance – North American – active
$
(245
)
 
$
(115
)
 
$
(360
)
 
2.2
%
Insurance – North American – run-off (2)
168

 

 
168

 
1.0
%
Insura nce – Overseas General
(121
)
 
(105
)
 
(226
)
 
3.1
%
Global Reinsurance
(32
)
 
(29
)
 
(61
)
 
2.7
%
Total
$
(230
)
 
$
(249
)
 
$
(479
)
 
1.9
%
2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insurance – North American – active
$
(186
)
 
$
(111
)
 
$
(297
)
 
1.9
%
Insurance – North American – run-off (2)
102

 

 
102

 
0.6
%
Insurance – Overseas General
(154
)
 
(136
)
 
(290
)
 
4.2
%
Global Reinsurance
(58
)
 
(13
)
 
(71
)
 
3.1
%
Total
$
(296
)
 
$
(260
)
 
$
(556
)
 
2.2
%
2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insurance – North American – active
$
(102
)
 
$
(137
)
 
$
(239
)
 
1.5
%
Insurance – North American – run-off (2)
132

 

 
132

 
0.8
%
Insurance – Overseas General
(159
)
 
(131
)
 
(290
)
 
4.3
%
Global Reinsurance
(72
)
 
(34
)
 
(106
)
 
4.7
%
Total
$
(201
)
 
$
(302
)
 
$
(503
)
 
2.0
%
(1)  
Calculated based on the segment's total beginning of period net unpaid loss and loss expenses reserves.
(2)  
Brandywine Holdings and Westchester Specialty operations in respect of 1996 and prior years.


Insurance – North American
Insurance – North American's active operations experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 360 million in 2012 which was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements driven by the following principal changes:
Net favorable development of $ 245 million on long-tail business, including:
Favorable development of $73 million on a collection of portfolios of umbrella and excess casualty business, primarily affecting the 2007 and prior accident years. The favorable development was the function of both the continuation of the lower than expected reported loss activity in the period since our last review and assigning greater weight to experience-based methods, particularly for the 2006 accident year, as these accident periods matured;
Favorable development of $67 million on our D&O portfolios primarily affecting the 2007 and prior accident years. Case loss activity was lower than expected during the 2012 calendar year, including reductions in our internal estimates of exposure on several potentially large claims. These reductions were a function of changes in account specific circumstances since our prior review;
Favorable development of $57 million in our medical risk operations, primarily in the 2007 and prior accident years. Reported and paid loss activity for these accident years continues to be lower than expected based on our prior review;

65

Table of Contents

Net favorable development of $39 million on our national accounts portfolios which consists of commercial auto liability, general liability, and workers' compensation lines of business. This favorable development was the net impact of favorable and adverse movements, including:
Favorable development of $41 million on the 2011 accident year related to our annual assessment of multi-claimant events including industrial accidents. Consistent with prior years, we reviewed these potential exposures after the close of the accident year to allow for late reporting or identification of significant losses;
Favorable development of $34 million in the 2007 accident year, primarily in workers' compensation. The favorable development was the combined effect of lower than expected incurred loss activity and an increase in weight given to experience-based methods; and
Adverse development of $36 million affecting the 2006 and prior accident years largely in workers' compensation. The causes for this adverse movement were various and included adverse development in the circumstances on several specific large claims, higher than expected loss activity on certain accident years, changes in our weighting of experience-based methods, and a refinement of our treatment of ceded reinsurance recoveries on a few select treaties due to information which became known since our prior review.
Favorable development of $9 million across a number of lines and accident years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate.
Favorable development of $ 115 million on short-tail business, including:
Favorable development of $88 million on our property, inland marine and commercial marine businesses primarily arising on the 2009 through 2011 accident years. Reported loss activity during the 2012 calendar was lower than expected, particularly in our high excess property portfolio; and
Favorable development of $27 million in our aviation product lines, primarily general aviation hull and liability, affecting the 2009 and prior accident years. Actual paid and incurred loss activity continues to be lower than expected based on long-term historical averages leading to a reduction in our estimate of ultimate losses.
Insurance – North American's run-off operations incurred net adverse prior period development of $ 168 million in our Westchester and Brandywine run-off operations during 2012, which was the net result of adverse and favorable movements impacting accident years 2001 and prior, driven by the following principal changes:
Adverse development of $150 million related to the completion of the reserve review during 2012. The development primarily arose from case specific asbestos and environmental claims related to increased loss and defense cost payment activity and the costs associated with certain case settlements made in 2012. Further, we experienced higher than expected paid loss and case reserve activity on our assumed reinsurance portfolio; and
Adverse development of $18 million on unallocated loss adjustment expenses due to run-off operating expenses paid during 2012.
Insurance – North American's active operations experienced net favorable prior period development of $297 million in 2011 which was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements, driven by the following principal changes:
Net favorable development of $186 million on long-tail business, including:
Favorable development of $82 million on our D&O portfolios affecting the 2006 and prior accident years. The favorable movement was due to lower than expected case incurred activity, including reductions in individual large claims, and greater weight given to experience-based projection methods;
Favorable development of $54 million in our excess casualty businesses affecting the 2005 and prior accident years. Incurred losses were favorable relative to our projections; in addition, as these accident years have matured, more weight was given to experience-based methods which resulted in a refinement of our estimate;
Favorable development of $43 million in our medical risk operations, primarily impacting the 2006 and prior accident years. This portfolio, composed largely of excess hospital professional liability insurance, experienced low levels of reported and paid loss activity leading to reduced estimates of ultimate loss versus our prior review;
Net favorable development of $28 million on our national accounts portfolios which consist of commercial auto liability, general liability, and workers' compensation lines of business. The net favorable development was the net impact of favorable and adverse movements, including:

66

Table of Contents

Favorable development of $40 million on the 2010 accident year primarily relating to our annual assessment of multi-claimant events including industrial accidents. Consistent with prior years, we reviewed these potential exposures after the close of the accident year to allow for late reporting or identification of significant losses;
Favorable development of $33 million on the 2003 through 2007 accident years, primarily in workers' compensation. Case activity in these portfolios, especially in our excess and high deductible products, was lower than expected. As these accident years matured, greater weight was given to experience-based methods. The combination of this lower than expected activity and shift in weighting methodology resulted in this favorable development; and
Adverse development of $45 million on the 2002 and prior accident years, primarily in workers' compensation. This adverse activity was due in part to data refinements and analysis relating to these accident periods.
Favorable development of $26 million on the 2002 through 2010 accident years in our financial solutions business unit relating to a single account. This development was due to more refined claimant level information provided by the insured in 2011. Analysis of this data led to reduction in our estimates of future losses as well as a recovery of past overpayments;
Favorable development of $26 million in our foreign casualty product affecting the 2007 and prior accident years. The paid and reported loss activity on the general liability and employers liability lines for this product were lower than expectations based on our prior review, resulting in reductions in ultimate losses for these coverage lines;
Favorable development of $21 million on surety business, primarily impacting the 2009 accident year. Case emergence and development for this accident year were more favorable than anticipated in our prior review, as well as in our original pricing for the policies written covering this period. We had assumed higher claims frequency due to recession, however, this did not materialize in our portfolio;
Adverse development of $40 million on errors and omissions coverage primarily affecting the 2007 and 2008 accident years. This development was due to increases on specific claims where new facts, including adverse legal verdicts, emerged;
Adverse development of $29 million in our environmental liability product line concentrated in the 2005 through 2007 accident years. There was adverse movement on specific large remediation cost cap policies observed in the 2011 calendar year, which prompted an increase in our estimate of ultimate loss and loss expenses under these insurance programs; and
Adverse development of $25 million across a number of lines and accident years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate.
Net favorable development of $111 million on short-tail business, including:
Favorable development of $48 million in our property portfolios primarily affecting the 2009 and 2010 accident years as our assessment of ultimate losses, including catastrophe losses, developed favorably during calendar year 2011; and
Favorable development of $63 million on other lines across a number of accident years, primarily following better than expected loss emergence, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate.

Insurance – North American's run-off operations incurred net adverse prior period development of $102 million in our Westchester and Brandywine run-off operations during 2011, which was the net result of adverse and favorable movements impacting accident years 2000 and prior, driven by the following principal changes:
Adverse development of $82 million related to the completion of the reserve review during 2011. The development primarily arose from case specific asbestos and environmental claims related to increased loss and defense cost payment activity. Further, we experienced increased paid loss and case reserve activity on our assumed reinsurance portfolio;
Adverse development of $17 million on unallocated loss adjustment expenses due to run-off operating expenses paid during 2011; and
Adverse development of $3 million across a number of lines and accident years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate.

Insurance – North American active operations experienced net favorable prior period development of $239 million in 2010, representing 1.5 percent of the segment's beginning of period net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves. Insurance – North

67

Table of Contents

American run-off operations incurred net adverse prior period development of $132 million in 2010, representing 0.8 percent of the segment's beginning of period net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves.

Insurance – Overseas General
Insurance – Overseas General experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 226 million in 2012, which was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements, driven by the following principal changes:
Net favorable development of $ 121 million on long-tail business, including:
Favorable development of $150 million in casualty (primary and excess) and financial lines for accident years 2008 and prior. We recognized the impact of favorable loss emergence since the prior study and continued to assign increased weight to experience-based methods; and
Adverse development of $29 million in casualty (mainly primary) and financial lines for accident years 2009 through 2011 in response to claims emergence mainly in 2011. The adverse development was driven by changes in case specific circumstances on several specific larger claims and, to a lesser extent, increased frequency trends in primary European casualty impacting accident year 2011.
Favorable development of $ 105 million on short-tail business, including property, marine, A&H, and personal lines across multiple geographical regions, and within both retail and wholesale operations, principally as a result of lower than expected loss emergence, mostly on accident years 2009 and 2010.
Insurance – Overseas General experienced net favorable prior period development of $290 million in 2011, which was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements, driven by the following principal changes:
Net favorable development of $154 million on long-tail business, including:
Favorable development of $337 million in casualty (primary and excess) and financial lines for accident years 2007 and prior. We recognized the impact of favorable loss emergence since the prior study and assigned increased weight to experience-based methods; and
Adverse development of $183 million in casualty (primary and excess) and financial lines for accident years 2008 through 2010 in response to claims emergence in 2011. First, the impact of notified large claims and a high level review of potential ultimate exposure from large claims across these lines led to a $140 million increase across these accident years. Second, the completion of a claims review related to the exposure from financial fraud and subprime claims led to another increase of $20 million. Finally, reserves were strengthened by $20 million in response to increasing frequency and severity trends within European primary casualty.
Net favorable development of $136 million on short-tail business, including property, marine, A&H, and energy lines across multiple geographical regions, and within both retail and wholesale operations, principally as a result of lower than expected loss emergence, principally on accident years 2008 and 2009.
Insurance – Overseas General experienced net favorable prior period development of $290 million in 2010, representing 4.3 percent of the segment's beginning of period net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves.

Global Reinsurance
Global Reinsurance experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 61 million in 2012, which was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements, driven by the following principal changes:
Net favorable development of $ 32 million on long-tail business, including:
Favorable prior period development of $54 million principally in treaty years 2008 and prior in casualty and medical malpractice lines. The lower loss estimates arose from a combination of favorable paid and incurred loss trends and increased weighting to experience-based methods;
Net adverse development of $18 million on non-medical professional liability, composed of favorable development of $16 million on treaty years 2005 and prior, offset by adverse development of $34 million on treaty years 2006 through 2011, driven by adverse reported losses relative to expected; and
Adverse development of $4 million across a number of lines and treaty years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate.

68

Table of Contents

Net favorable development of $29 million on short-tail business, principally in treaty years 2010 and prior across property lines (including property catastrophe), trade credit, marine, and surety principally as a result of lower than expected loss emergence.
Global Reinsurance experienced net favorable prior period development of $71 million in 2011, which was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements, driven by the following principal changes:
Net favorable development of $58 million on long-tail business, including net favorable prior period development of $79 million principally in treaty years 2007 and prior across a number of portfolios (professional liability, D&O, casualty, and medical malpractice). The lower loss estimates arose from a combination of favorable paid and incurred loss trends and increased weighting to experience-based methods; and
Net favorable development of $13 million on short-tail business, including net favorable prior period development of $34 million principally in treaty years 2009 and prior across property lines, including property catastrophe, trade credit and surety principally as a result of lower than expected loss emergence.
Global Reinsurance experienced net favorable prior period development of $106 million in 2010, representing 4.7 percent of the segment's beginning of period net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves.


69

Table of Contents

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Segment Operating Results – Years Ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010
The discussions that follow include tables that show our segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 .
We operate through the following business segments: Insurance – North American, Insurance – Overseas General, Global Reinsurance, and Life. For additional information on each of our segments refer to “Segment Information” under Item 1.
Insurance – North American
The Insurance – North American segment comprises our operations in the U.S., Canada, and Bermuda. This segment includes our retail divisions ACE USA (including ACE Canada), ACE Commercial Risk Services, and ACE Private Risk Services; our wholesale and specialty divisions ACE Westchester, ACE Agriculture, and ACE Bermuda; and various run-off operations, including Brandywine Holdings Corporation (Brandywine).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Net premiums written
$
7,208

 
$
6,851

 
$
5,797

 
5.2
 %
 
18.2
 %
Net premiums earned
7,019

 
6,911

 
5,651

 
1.6
 %
 
22.3
 %
Losses and loss expenses
5,626

 
5,276

 
3,918

 
6.6
 %
 
34.7
 %
Policy acquisition costs
586

 
612

 
626

 
(4.2
)%
 
(2.2
)%
Administrative expenses
601

 
592

 
561

 
1.5
 %
 
5.5
 %
Underwriting income
206

 
431

 
546

 
(52.2
)%
 
(21.1
)%
Net investment income
1,091

 
1,170

 
1,138

 
(6.8
)%
 
2.8
 %
Net realized gains (losses)
42

 
34

 
417

 
23.5
 %
 
(91.8
)%
Interest expense
12

 
15

 
9

 
(20.0
)%
 
66.7
 %
Other (income) expense
(9
)
 
5

 
(22
)
 
NM

 
NM

Income tax expense
200

 
395

 
435

 
(49.4
)%
 
(9.2
)%
Net income
$
1,136

 
$
1,220

 
$
1,679

 
(6.9
)%
 
(27.3
)%
Loss and loss expense ratio
80.2
%
 
76.3
%
 
69.3
%
 
 
 
 
Policy acquisition cost ratio
8.3
%
 
8.9
%
 
11.1
%
 
 
 
 
Administrative expense ratio
8.6
%
 
8.6
%
 
9.9
%
 
 
 
 
Combined ratio
97.1
%
 
93.8
%
 
90.3
%
 
 
 
 
Net premiums written increased in 2012 in our retail division reflecting rate increases in most lines, strong renewal retention, and new business. Growth in our retail division was due to higher production from a broad array of products including our primary casualty and risk management businesses, property, A&H, a range of specialty casualty products, and professional risk lines of business. In addition, we continued to generate higher personal lines production including higher premiums in the homeowners and automobile business offered through ACE Private Risk Services. Growth in our retail division was partially offset by lower premiums in certain casualty and program business from adherence to our underwriting standards; in particular, we continued our planned reduction in our U.S. general market workers' compensation business. Net premiums written in our wholesale and specialty division decreased in 2012 due to lower crop-hail production. However, we experienced growth in many excess and surplus property, casualty, and professional lines where we benefited from rate increases, strong renewal retention, and new business. In addition, we also experienced growth in farm and agricultural property from the November 2011 acquisition of Penn Millers.
Net premiums written increased in 2011 reflecting significantly higher premiums in our wholesale and specialty division specifically in agriculture due to the acquisition of Rain and Hail in December 2010. This increase was partially offset by lower wholesale casualty production due to competitive market conditions and our adherence to underwriting standards. Our retail division reported less net premiums written in 2011 due to lower production in many of our retail property and casualty lines reflecting competitive market conditions and our adherence to underwriting standards. In addition, our retail division wrote less assumed LPT business in 2011. These decreases were partially offset by growth in targeted classes, including A&H and certain

70

Table of Contents

property and professional lines, and growth in personal lines business primarily in our homeowners and automobile business, as well as other specialty offerings.

Net premiums earned increased in 2012 due to growth in our retail division from higher premiums earned in our property, risk management, specialty casualty, professional, and A&H lines of business along with growth in our personal lines business from continued expansion of the ACE Private Risk Services product offerings. Growth in net premiums earned for our retail division was partially offset by lower premiums in certain casualty and program business; in particular, we continued our planned reduction in our U.S. general market workers' compensation business. Our wholesale and specialty division generated lower net premiums earned in 2012 primarily in agriculture due to lower crop-hail business that more than offset the growth in net premiums earned from the acquisition of Penn Millers in November 2011 and the increased premiums in our wholesale property, inland marine, and environmental lines of business.

Net premiums earned increased in 2011 primarily attributable to higher wholesale and specialty premiums in agriculture due to the acquisition of Rain and Hail in December 2010. Our retail businesses generated lower net premiums earned mainly in the property and casualty risk lines of business reflecting lower writings in these lines due to adherence to underwriting standards and less premiums associated with assumed LPT business in 2011. These decreases were partially offset by growth in certain lines of business within our professional risk, A&H and program operations. Net premiums earned for the personal lines business increased in 2011 due to continued expansion of the ACE Private Risk Services product offerings.

The following tables present a line of business breakdown of Insurance – North American’s net premiums earned for the periods indicated:
 
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

2011 vs. 2010

Property and all other
$
1,370

 
$
1,232

 
$
1,180

 
11.2
 %
4.4
 %
Agriculture
1,872

 
1,942

 
398

 
(3.6
)%
387.9
 %
Casualty
3,406

 
3,380

 
3,777

 
0.8
 %
(10.5
)%
Personal accident (A&H)
371

 
357

 
296

 
3.9
 %
20.6
 %
Net premiums earned
$
7,019

 
$
6,911

 
$
5,651

 
1.6
 %
22.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
% of Total

 
2011
% of Total

 
2010
% of Total

 
 
 
Property and all other
20
%
 
18
%
 
21
%
 
 
 
Agriculture
27
%
 
28
%
 
7
%
 
 
 
Casualty
48
%
 
49
%
 
67
%
 
 
 
Personal accident (A&H)
5
%
 
5
%
 
5
%
 
 
 
Net premiums earned
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
 
 
The following table presents the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior period reserve development, and large assumed LPTs on our loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated:
 
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Loss and loss expense ratio, as reported
80.2
 %
 
76.3
 %
 
69.3
 %
Catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums
(6.4
)%
 
(5.1
)%
 
(2.6
)%
Prior period development
2.8
 %
 
2.9
 %
 
2.7
 %
Large assumed loss portfolio transfers

 

 
(0.5
)%
Loss and loss expense ratio, adjusted
76.6
 %
 
74.1
 %
 
68.9
 %

Net pre-tax catastrophe losses, excluding reinstatement premiums, were $ 441 million in 2012, compared with $ 347 million in 2011 and $ 143 million in 2010. Catastrophe losses in 2012 were primarily from Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Isaac, and other severe weather-related events in the U.S. and Canada. Catastrophe losses in 2011 were from severe weather-related events in the U.S., including Hurricane Irene and flooding, as well as exposure from the Japan earthquake and the flooding in Thailand. Catastrophe losses in 2010 were primarily from severe weather-related events in the U.S. and earthquakes in Haiti

71

Table of Contents

and Chile. Net favorable prior period development was $ 192 million in 2012, compared with $ 195 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010. Refer to “Prior Period Development” for additional information.

The adjusted loss and loss expense ratio increased in 2012 primarily due to an increase in the current accident year loss ratio from the impact of the U.S. drought on our agriculture business, partially offset by a reduction in the current accident year loss ratio for several of our property, casualty and professional lines where execution of detailed portfolio management plans has resulted in improved loss ratio performance. The adjusted loss and loss expense ratio increased in 2011 primarily due to the increase in agriculture from the acquisition of Rain and Hail in December 2010, partially offset by lower assumed loss portfolio business, both of which are written at a higher loss ratio than our other types of business.

The policy acquisition cost ratio decreased in 2012 primarily due to lower profit sharing commission expenses in our agriculture business reflecting high losses in the crop insurance business. This decrease was partially offset by growth in certain businesses, including personal lines and A&H that carry a higher acquisition rate than our other businesses, and increased spending for strategic initiatives to support future growth opportunities. The policy acquisition cost ratio decreased in 2011 primarily reflecting a shift in mix of business towards lower acquisition cost lines of business, primarily agriculture. Partially offsetting the growth in the low expense ratio business was targeted growth in several higher acquisition ratio lines of business, including personal and professional lines, as well as commercial risk program business.

The administrative expense ratio was flat in 2012 as the increase in premiums earned outpaced the growth in expenses, primarily in our large risk management business. We increased spending to support growth, primarily in our retail businesses, including ACE Private Risk Services. The administrative expense ratio decreased in 2011 primarily due to the growth of low expense ratio business generated by agriculture, partially offset by lower net results generated by our third party claims administration business.

Insurance – Overseas General

The Insurance – Overseas General segment comprises ACE International, our retail commercial P&C, A&H, and personal lines businesses serving territories outside the U.S., Bermuda, and Canada; the international portion of Combined Insurance; and the wholesale insurance business of AGM, our London-based international and specialty excess and surplus lines business that includes Lloyd's of London (Lloyd’s) Syndicate 2488 (Syndicate 2488). The reinsurance operation of AGM is included in the Global Reinsurance segment.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Net premiums written
$
5,863

 
$
5,629

 
$
5,189

 
4.2
 %
 
8.5
 %
Net premiums earned
5,740

 
5,614

 
5,153

 
2.2
 %
 
9.0
 %
Losses and loss expenses
2,862

 
3,029

 
2,615

 
(5.5
)%
 
15.8
 %
Policy acquisition costs
1,353

 
1,335

 
1,209

 
1.3
 %
 
10.4
 %
Administrative expenses
935

 
939

 
837

 
(0.4
)%
 
12.2
 %
Underwriting income
590

 
311

 
492

 
89.7
 %
 
(36.8
)%
Net investment income
521

 
546

 
473

 
(4.6
)%
 
15.4
 %
Net realized gains (losses)
103

 
33

 
123

 
212.1
 %
 
(73.2
)%
Interest expense
5

 
5

 
1

 

 
NM

Other (income) expense
3

 

 
(13
)
 
NM

 
NM

Income tax expense
133

 
164

 
171

 
(18.9
)%
 
(4.1
)%
Net income
$
1,073

 
$
721

 
$
929

 
48.8
 %
 
(22.4
)%
Loss and loss expense ratio
49.8
%
 
54.0
%
 
50.8
%
 
 
 
 
Policy acquisition cost ratio
23.6
%
 
23.8
%
 
23.5
%
 
 
 
 
Administrative expense ratio
16.3
%
 
16.7
%
 
16.2
%
 
 
 
 
Combined ratio
89.7
%
 
94.5
%
 
90.5
%
 
 
 
 

72

Table of Contents

Insurance – Overseas General conducts business internationally and in most major foreign currencies.
The following table presents by major product line the approximate effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the growth of net premiums written and earned for the periods indicated:
 
2012
 
 
2011

 
2010

 
P&C

 
A&H

 
Total

 
Total

 
Total

Net premiums written:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Growth in original currency
9.6
 %
 
4.5
 %
 
7.7
 %
 
4.1
%
 
0.4
 %
Foreign exchange effect
(3.5
)%
 
(3.6
)%
 
(3.5
)%
 
4.4
%
 
2.5
 %
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
6.1
 %
 
0.9
 %
 
4.2
 %
 
8.5
%
 
2.9
 %
Net premiums earned:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Growth in original currency
7.3
 %
 
3.9
 %
 
6.0
 %
 
3.9
%
 
(0.1
)%
Foreign exchange effect
(3.8
)%
 
(3.7
)%
 
(3.8
)%
 
5.1
%
 
2.2
 %
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
3.5
 %
 
0.2
 %
 
2.2
 %
 
9.0
%
 
2.1
 %

Net premiums written increased in 2012 from growth in our retail operations in all of our major product lines - P&C, A&H and personal lines. Growth in our P&C and A&H lines was primarily driven by strong results in both Latin America and Asia, but were adversely impacted by Combined Insurance's European business. In addition, P&C growth benefited from the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in 2011. New business opportunities in Latin America, Asia, and Europe drove the growth in personal lines. Growth in net premiums written for 2012 was adversely impacted by foreign exchange.

For 2011, net premiums written increased primarily due to growth in our retail operations, mainly Latin America and Asia, as well as the acquisition of Jerneh Insurance Berhad. This result was partly offset by the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with the first quarter 2011 catastrophe activity. Growth in net premiums written for 2011 was favorably impacted by foreign exchange.

Net premiums earned increased in 2012 driven by strong performances in our retail operations in Latin America and Asia, as well as the favorable impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in 2011. This result was partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange. For 2011, net premiums earned increased, primarily due to growth in the international retail operations and the favorable impact of foreign exchange. These results were partially offset by the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with first quarter 2011 catastrophe activity and declines in our London wholesale business due to pricing.

73

Table of Contents

The following tables present a line of business breakdown of Insurance – Overseas General’s net premiums earned for the periods indicated:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Line of Business
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and all other
$
2,236

 
$
2,080

 
$
1,800

 
7.5
 %
 
15.6
 %
Casualty
1,379

 
1,415

 
1,424

 
(2.5
)%
 
(0.6
)%
Personal accident (A&H)
2,125

 
2,119

 
1,929

 
0.3
 %
 
9.8
 %
Net premiums earned
$
5,740

 
$
5,614

 
$
5,153

 
2.2
 %
 
9.0
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
% of Total

 
2011
% of Total

 
2010
% of Total

 
 

 
 

Line of Business
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and all other
39
%
 
37
%
 
35
%
 
 
 
 
Casualty
24
%
 
25
%
 
28
%
 
 
 
 
Personal accident (A&H)
37
%
 
38
%
 
37
%
 
 
 
 
Net premiums earned
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
 
 
 
The following table presents the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and prior period reserve development on our loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated:
 
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Loss and loss expense ratio, as reported
49.8
 %
 
54.0
 %
 
50.8
 %
Catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums
(1.4
)%
 
(6.3
)%
 
(2.9
)%
Prior period development
4.0
 %
 
5.2
 %
 
5.6
 %
Loss and loss expense ratio, adjusted
52.4
 %
 
52.9
 %
 
53.5
 %

Net pre-tax catastrophe losses, excluding reinstatement premiums, were $ 76 million in 2012, compared with $ 329 million in 2011 and $ 132 million in 2010. Catastrophe losses in 2012 were primarily from Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Isaac, and flooding in the U.K. Catastrophe losses in 2011 included flooding in Thailand, earthquakes in New Zealand and Japan, and storms in the U.S. and Australia. Catastrophe losses in 2010 were primarily related to earthquakes in Chile and Mexico, and storms in Australia and Europe. Net favorable prior period development was $ 226 million in 2012, compared with $ 290 million in both 2011 and 2010. Refer to “Prior Period Development” for additional information.

The adjusted loss ratio decreased in 2012 primarily due to the reduction of current accident year losses across several lines of business in several regions. The adjusted loss ratio decreased in 2011 due to a change in the mix of business towards lower loss ratio products and favorable loss trends.

The policy acquisition cost ratio decreased in 2012 due to lower A&H costs, a favorable change in the mix of business, and the favorable impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in 2011. The policy acquisition cost ratio increased in 2011 primarily due to the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed during the year and changes in the mix of business.

The administrative expense ratio decreased in 2012 primarily due to lower regulatory costs for Combined in the U.K. and Ireland and the favorable impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in 2011. The administrative expense ratio increased in 2011 primarily due to the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed and regulatory costs for Combined in the U.K. and Ireland.

74

Table of Contents

Global Reinsurance
The Global Reinsurance segment represents our reinsurance operations comprising ACE Tempest Re Bermuda, ACE Tempest Re USA, ACE Tempest Re International, and ACE Tempest Re Canada. Global Reinsurance markets its reinsurance products worldwide under the ACE Tempest Re brand name and provides a broad range of coverage to a diverse array of primary P&C companies.
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Net premiums written
$
1,025

 
$
979

 
$
1,075

 
4.7
 %
 
(8.9
)%
Net premiums earned
1,002

 
1,003

 
1,071

 

 
(6.3
)%
Losses and loss expenses
553

 
621

 
518

 
(11.0
)%
 
19.9
 %
Policy acquisition costs
172

 
185

 
204

 
(7.0
)%
 
(9.3
)%
Administrative expenses
51

 
52

 
55

 
(1.9
)%
 
(5.5
)%
Underwriting income
226

 
145

 
294

 
55.9
 %
 
(50.7
)%
Net investment income
290

 
287

 
288

 
1.0
 %
 
(0.3
)%
Net realized gains (losses)
6

 
(50
)
 
93

 
NM

 
NM

Interest expense
4

 
2

 

 
100.0
 %
 
 NM

Other (income) expense
(15
)
 
(1
)
 
(23
)
 
NM

 
(95.7
)%
Income tax expense
15

 
30

 
42

 
(50.0
)%
 
(28.6
)%
Net income
$
518

 
$
351

 
$
656

 
47.6
 %
 
(46.5
)%
Loss and loss expense ratio
55.2
%
 
62.0
%
 
48.4
%
 
 
 
 
Policy acquisition cost ratio
17.1
%
 
18.4
%
 
19.0
%
 
 
 
 
Administrative expense ratio
5.2
%
 
5.2
%
 
5.1
%
 
 
 
 
Combined ratio
77.5
%
 
85.6
%
 
72.5
%
 
 
 
 

Net premiums written increased in 2012 due to new U.S. property treaties written in the year, improved pricing conditions in our property catastrophe business, growth in our U.S. automobile business, partially offset by lower production in the first quarter of 2012 from competitive market conditions, adherence to underwriting standards, and an LPT treaty written in the prior year. Net premiums written decreased in 2011 primarily due to competitive market conditions and lower exposures, partially offset by reductions in retrocessions.

Net premiums earned were flat in 2012 as a result of competitive market conditions. Net premiums earned decreased in 2011 primarily due to decreases in production and exposures during the year reflecting competitive market conditions, particularly in casualty and other long-tail lines.



75

Table of Contents

The following tables present a line of business breakdown of Global Reinsurance’s net premiums earned for the periods indicated:
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Property and all other
$
194

 
$
177

 
$
239

 
9.6
 %
 
(25.9
)%
Casualty
507

 
545

 
551

 
(7.0
)%
 
(1.1
)%
Property catastrophe
301

 
281

 
281

 
7.1
 %
 

Net premiums earned
$
1,002

 
$
1,003

 
$
1,071

 

 
(6.3
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
% of Total

 
2011
% of Total

 
2010 % of Total

 
 

 
 

Property and all other
19
%
 
18
%
 
22
%
 
 
 
 
Casualty
51
%
 
54
%
 
51
%
 
 
 
 
Property catastrophe
30
%
 
28
%
 
27
%
 
 
 
 
Net premiums earned
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
 
 
 
The following table presents the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and prior period reserve development on our loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated:
 
 
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Loss and loss expense ratio, as reported
55.2
 %
 
62.0
 %
 
48.4
 %
Catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums
(11.1
)%
 
(18.0
)%
 
(8.4
)%
Prior period development
6.3
 %
 
7.7
 %
 
10.0
 %
Loss and loss expense ratio, adjusted
50.4
 %
 
51.7
 %
 
50.0
 %

Net pre-tax catastrophe losses, excluding reinstatement premiums, were $ 116 million in 2012, compared with $ 183 million in 2011 and $ 91 million in 2010. Catastrophe losses in 2012 were primarily from Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Isaac, and other North American weather-related events. Catastrophe losses in 2011 were primarily from earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand, and weather-related events in the U.S. Catastrophe losses in 2010 were primarily from storms in Australia and the earthquake in New Zealand. Net favorable prior period development was $ 61 million in 2012, compared with $ 71 million in 2011 and $ 106 million in 2010 (2012 and 2011 are net of $4 million and $13 million, respectively, of unfavorable premium adjustments to loss sensitive treaties). Refer to “Prior Period Development” for additional information.

The adjusted loss and loss expense ratio decreased in 2012 due to an increase in lower loss ratio property catastrophe business and from the favorable impact of an LPT treaty written in 2011, partially offset by the impact of the new medical malpractice LPT written in 2012 and unfavorable current accident year loss experience. The adjusted loss and loss expense ratio increased in 2011 due to a full year of earnings on a workers' compensation treaty and a medical malpractice LPT treaty, both with high loss ratios.

The policy acquisition cost ratio decreased in 2012 from the impact of a medical malpractice LPT treaty which did not generate acquisition costs, favorable profit commission accruals on the catastrophe retrocession contract, and net favorable adjustments on loss sensitive contract provisions. The policy acquisition cost ratio decreased in 2011 as a result of lower commissions in our U.S. operations, primarily due to additional earned premium from a significant workers' compensation treaty first written in mid-2010 and a medical malpractice LPT treaty, both of which did not generate acquisition costs, as well as the favorable impact of the change in the mix of business earned. These lower commissions were partially offset by reductions in catastrophe retrocession profit commissions.

The administrative expense ratio was flat in 2012. The administrative expense ratio was relatively flat in 2011 as lower administrative expenses were offset by a decrease in net premiums earned.

76

Table of Contents

Life
The Life segment includes our international life operations (ACE Life), ACE Tempest Life Re (ACE Life Re), and the North American supplemental A&H and life business of Combined Insurance. We assess the performance of our life business based on life underwriting income, which includes Net investment income and (Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets that do not qualify for separate account reporting under GAAP.
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

Net premiums written
$
1,979

 
$
1,913

 
$
1,647

 
3.4
 %
 
16.2
 %
Net premiums earned
1,916

 
1,859

 
1,629

 
3.1
 %
 
14.1
 %
Losses and loss expenses
611

 
593

 
528

 
3.0
 %
 
12.3
 %
Policy benefits
521

 
401

 
357

 
29.9
 %
 
12.3
 %
(Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets (1)
(29
)
 
36

 

 
NM

 
NM

Policy acquisition costs
334

 
339

 
306

 
(1.5
)%
 
10.8
 %
Administrative expenses
328

 
317

 
246

 
3.5
 %
 
28.9
 %
Net investment income
251

 
226

 
174

 
11.1
 %
 
29.9
 %
Life underwriting income
402

 
399

 
366

 
0.8
 %
 
9.0
 %
Net realized gains (losses)
(72
)
 
(806
)
 
(192
)
 
(91.1
)%
 
NM

Interest expense
12

 
11

 
3

 
9.1
 %
 
NM

Other (income) expense (1)
25

 
26

 
26

 
(3.8
)%
 

Income tax expense
58

 
50

 
59

 
16.0
 %
 
(15.3
)%
Net income (loss)
$
235

 
$
(494
)
 
$
86

 
NM

 
NM

 
(1)  
(Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets that do not qualify for separate account reporting under GAAP are reclassified from Other (income) expense for purposes of presenting Life underwriting income.
The following table presents a line of business breakdown of Life's net premiums written and deposits collected on universal life and investment contracts for the periods indicated:
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2012 vs. 2011

 
2011 vs. 2010

A&H
$
1,011

 
$
996

 
$
1,014

 
1.5
 %
 
(1.8
)%
Life insurance
654

 
573

 
275

 
14.1
 %
 
108.4
 %
Life reinsurance
314

 
344

 
358

 
(8.7
)%
 
(3.9
)%
Net premiums written (excludes deposits below)
$
1,979

 
$
1,913

 
$
1,647

 
3.4
 %
 
16.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits collected on universal life and investment contracts
$
611

 
$
503

 
$
257

 
21.5
 %
 
95.7
 %

A&H net premiums written increased in 2012 due to a catch-up in premium registrations and growth in certain program business, partially offset by decreases in net premiums written due to the continuing effects on the economy resulting in lower new business and renewals. A&H net premiums written decreased in 2011 due to the effects of the economy resulting in lower new business. Life insurance net premiums written increased in 2012 and 2011 primarily due to growth in our Asian markets. Life reinsurance net premiums written decreased in 2012 and 2011 because there is no new life reinsurance business currently being written.

Deposits collected on universal life and investment contracts are properly not reflected as revenues in our consolidated statements of operations in accordance with GAAP. New life deposits are an important component of production and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they are an important indicator of future profitability. The increase in deposits collected in 2012 and 2011 is primarily due to growth in our Asian markets.


77

Table of Contents

Net realized gains (losses), which are excluded from Life underwriting income, relate primarily to the change in the net fair value of reported GLB reinsurance liabilities and changes in the fair value of derivatives used to partially offset the risk in the variable annuity guarantee portfolio. During 2012, realized losses were associated with a decrease in the value of derivative instruments, which decrease in value when the S&P 500 index increases. These realized losses were substantially offset by realized gains resulting from a net decrease in the value of GLB liabilities; this decrease was primarily due to rising equity levels and a weakening yen, partially offset by an increased value of GLB liabilities due to falling interest rates and the unfavorable impact of discounting future claims for one less year.  During 2011, realized losses were associated with an increased value of GLB liabilities due to falling interest rates, falling international equity markets, and the annual collection of premium. During 2010, realized losses were associated with an increase in the value of GLB liabilities due to falling interest rates and the annual collection of premium, partially offset by a decreased value of GLB liabilities due to rising equity levels and model enhancements. In addition, we experienced a decrease in the value of the derivative instruments, which decrease in value when the S&P 500 index increases.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Net Investment Income
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Fixed maturities
$
2,134

 
$
2,196

 
$
2,071

Short-term investments
28

 
43

 
34

Equity securities
34

 
36

 
26

Other
104

 
62

 
44

Gross investment income
2,300

 
2,337

 
2,175

Investment expenses
(119
)
 
(95
)
 
(105
)
Net investment income
$
2,181

 
$
2,242

 
$
2,070

Net investment income is influenced by a number of factors including the amounts and timing of inward and outward cash flows, the level of interest rates, and changes in overall asset allocation. Net investment income decreased 2.8 percent in 2012 compared with 2011 primarily due to lower reinvestment rates, higher investment expenses, and the negative impact of foreign exchange, partially offset by positive operating cash flows, higher private equity fund distributions, and the income benefit of an insurance contract classified as a deposit. Net investment income increased 8.3 percent in 2011 compared with 2010 resulting from a higher overall average invested asset base from acquisitions and higher private equity fund distributions, partially offset by lower yields on new investments.
The investment portfolio’s average market yield on fixed maturities was 2.3 percent , 3.1 percent , and 3.6 percent at December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively. Average market yield on fixed maturities represents the weighted average yield to maturity of our fixed income portfolio based on the market prices of the holdings at that date.
The 1.2 percent yield on short-term investments reflects the global nature of our insurance operations. For example, yields on short-term investments in Malaysia, Korea, and Ecuador range from 3.0 percent to 4.4 percent .
The yield on our equity securities portfolio is high relative to the yield on the S&P 500 Index because of dividends on preferred equity securities and because we classify our strategic emerging debt portfolio, which is a mutual fund, as equity. The preferred equity securities and strategic emerging debt portfolio represent approximately 70 percent of our equity securities portfolio.
The following table shows the return on average invested assets:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Average invested assets
$
55,665

 
$
52,093

 
$
48,044

Net investment income
$
2,181

 
$
2,242

 
$
2,070

Return on average invested assets
3.9
%
 
4.3
%
 
4.3
%


78

Table of Contents

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)

We take a long-term view with our investment strategy, and our investment managers manage our investment portfolio to maximize total return within certain specific guidelines designed to minimize risk. The majority of our investment portfolio is available for sale and reported at fair value. Our held to maturity investment portfolio is reported at amortized cost.
The effect of market movements on our available for sale investment portfolio impacts net income (through net realized gains (losses)) when securities are sold or when we record an Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charge in net income. For a discussion related to how we assess OTTI for all of our investments, including credit-related OTTI, and the related impact on net income, refer to Note 3 d) to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, net income is impacted through the reporting of changes in the fair value of derivatives, including financial futures, options, swaps, and GLB reinsurance. Changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation on available for sale securities, which result from the revaluation of securities held, are reported as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets.
The following tables present our pre-tax net realized and unrealized gains (losses) as well as a breakdown of our OTTI and other net realized gains (losses) on investments for the periods indicated:
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 

Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Net
Realized
Gains
(Losses)

 
Net
Unrealized
Gains
(Losses)

 
Net
Impact

 
Net
Realized
Gains
(Losses)

 
Net
Unrealized
Gains
(Losses)

 
Net
Impact

Fixed maturities
$
230

 
$
1,005

 
$
1,235

 
$
164

 
$
480

 
$
644

Fixed income derivatives
(6
)
 

 
(6
)
 
(143
)
 

 
(143
)
Total fixed maturities
224

 
1,005

 
1,229

 
21

 
480

 
501

Public equity
4

 
61

 
65

 
9

 
(47
)
 
(38
)
Private equity
(7
)
 
49

 
42

 
(3
)
 
22

 
19

Other
3

 
5

 
8

 
(22
)
 
(7
)
 
(29
)
Subtotal
224

 
1,120

 
1,344

 
5

 
448

 
453

Derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value adjustment on insurance derivatives
171

 

 
171

 
(779
)
 

 
(779
)
S&P put option and futures
(297
)
 

 
(297
)
 
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
Fair value adjustment on other derivatives
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
 
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
Subtotal derivatives
(130
)
 

 
(130
)
 
(787
)
 

 
(787
)
Foreign exchange losses
(16
)
 

 
(16
)
 
(13
)
 

 
(13
)
Total gains (losses)
$
78

 
$
1,120

 
$
1,198

 
$
(795
)
 
$
448

 
$
(347
)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
OTTI

 
Other Net
Realized
Gains
(Losses)

 
Net
Realized
Gains
(Losses)

 
OTTI

 
Other Net
Realized
Gains
(Losses)

 
Net
Realized
Gains
(Losses)

Fixed maturities
$
(25
)
 
$
255

 
$
230

 
$
(46
)
 
$
210

 
$
164

Public equity
(5
)
 
9

 
4

 
(1
)
 
10

 
9

Private equity
(7
)
 

 
(7
)
 
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
Other

 
3

 
3

 

 
(22
)
 
(22
)
Total
$
(37
)
 
$
267

 
$
230

 
$
(50
)
 
$
198

 
$
148

Our net realized gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2012 , included write-downs of $ 37 million as a result of an other-than-temporary decline in fair value of certain securities. This compares with write-downs of $ 50 million in 2011 .

79

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2012 , our investment portfolios held by U.S. legal entities included approximately $ 32 million of gross unrealized losses on fixed income investments. Our tax planning strategy related to these losses is based on our view that we will hold these fixed income investments until they recover their cost. As such, we have recognized a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 11 million related to these fixed income investments. This strategy allows us to recognize the associated deferred tax asset related to these fixed income investments as we do not believe these losses will ever be realized.

We engage in a securities lending program which involves lending investments to other institutions for short periods of time. ACE invests the collateral received in securities of high credit quality and liquidity, with the objective of maintaining a stable principal balance. Certain investments purchased with the securities lending collateral declined in value resulting in an unrealized loss of $ 4 million at December 31, 2012 . The unrealized loss is attributable to fluctuations in market values of the underlying performing debt instruments held by the respective mutual funds, rather than default of a debt issuer. It is our view that the decline in value is temporary.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Other (Income) and Expense Items
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U. S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Equity in net (income) loss of partially-owned entities
$
(80
)

$
(32
)

$
(75
)
Amortization of intangible assets
51


29


9

(Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets
(29
)

36



Federal excise and capital taxes
22


20


19

Acquisition-related costs
11


5


14

Other
19


23


23

Other (income) expense
$
(6
)

$
81


$
(10
)

Other (income) expense includes (Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets that do not qualify for separate account reporting under GAAP. The offsetting movement in the separate account liabilities is included in Policy benefits in the consolidated statements of operations. Equity in net (income) loss of partially-owned entities includes our share of net (income) loss related to investment funds, limited partnerships, partially-owned investment companies, and partially-owned insurance companies. Certain federal excise and capital taxes incurred as a result of capital management initiatives are included in Other (income) expense in the consolidated statements of operations. As these are considered capital transactions, they are excluded from underwriting results.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Investments
Our investment portfolio is invested primarily in publicly traded, investment grade fixed income securities with an average credit quality of A/Aa as rated by the independent investment rating services Standard and Poor’s (S&P)/ Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s). The portfolio is externally managed by independent, professional investment managers and is broadly diversified across geographies, sectors, and issuers. Other investments principally comprise direct investments, investment funds, and limited partnerships. We hold no collateralized debt obligations or collateralized loan obligations in our investment portfolio and we provide no credit default protection. We have long-standing global credit limits for our entire portfolio across the organization. Exposures are aggregated, monitored, and actively managed by our Global Credit Committee, comprising senior executives, including our Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Risk Officer, our Chief Investment Officer, and our Treasurer. We also have well-established, strict contractual investment rules requiring managers to maintain highly diversified exposures to individual issuers and closely monitor investment manager compliance with portfolio guidelines.
The average duration of our fixed income securities, including the effect of options and swaps, was 3.9 years at December 31, 2012 and 3.7 years at December 31, 2011 . We estimate that a 100 basis point (bps) increase in interest rates would reduce the valuation of our fixed income portfolio by approximately $2.2 billion at December 31, 2012 .

80

Table of Contents


The following table shows the fair value and cost/amortized cost of our invested assets: 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Fair
Value

 
Cost/
Amortized
Cost

 
Fair
Value

 
Cost/
Amortized
Cost

Fixed maturities available for sale
$
47,306

 
$
44,666

 
$
41,967

 
$
40,450

Fixed maturities held to maturity
7,633

 
7,270

 
8,605

 
8,447

Short-term investments
2,228

 
2,228

 
2,301

 
2,301

 
57,167

 
54,164

 
52,873

 
51,198

Equity securities
744

 
707

 
647

 
671

Other investments
2,716

 
2,465

 
2,314

 
2,112

Total investments
$
60,627

 
$
57,336

 
$
55,834

 
$
53,981

The fair value of our total investments increased $4.8 billion during the year ended December 31, 2012 , primarily due to the investing of operating cash flows and unrealized appreciation.
The following tables show the market value of our fixed maturities and short-term investments at December 31, 2012 and 2011 . The first table lists investments according to type and the second according to S&P credit rating:
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
Market Value

 
Percentage
of Total

 
Market Value

 
Percentage
of Total

Treasury
$
2,794

 
5
%
 
$
2,361

 
5
%
Agency
2,024

 
4
%
 
1,725

 
3
%
Corporate and asset-backed securities
18,983

 
33
%
 
17,030

 
32
%
Mortgage-backed securities
12,589

 
22
%
 
13,237

 
25
%
Municipal
3,872

 
7
%
 
2,888

 
6
%
Non-U.S.
14,677

 
25
%
 
13,331

 
25
%
Short-term investments
2,228

 
4
%
 
2,301

 
4
%
Total
$
57,167

 
100
%
 
$
52,873

 
100
%
AAA
$
9,285

 
16
%
 
$
9,284

 
18
%
AA
22,014

 
39
%
 
20,562

 
39
%
A
10,760

 
19
%
 
10,106

 
19
%
BBB
6,591

 
12
%
 
6,152

 
12
%
BB
4,146

 
7
%
 
3,755

 
7
%
B
3,846

 
6
%
 
2,428

 
4
%
Other
525

 
1
%
 
586

 
1
%
Total
$
57,167

 
100
%
 
$
52,873

 
100
%

As part of our overall investment strategy, we may invest in states, municipalities, and other political subdivisions fixed maturity securities (Municipal). We apply the same investment selection process described previously to our Municipal investments. The portfolio is highly diversified primarily in state general obligation bonds and essential service revenue bonds including education and utilities (water, power, and sewers). As of December 31, 2012 , the state of California, including political subdivisions and other municipal issuers within the state, represented approximately 16 percent of our Municipal investments. A majority of the single state exposure represents special revenue bonds. Over 70 percent of our Municipal investments carry an S&P rating of AA- or better and none carry fair values that reflect a significantly different risk compared to those ratings. These Municipal investments are split 42 percent and 58 percent between general obligation and special revenue bonds, respectively.

81

Table of Contents

Our exposure to the Euro results primarily from ACE European Group which is headquartered in London and offers a broad range of coverages throughout the European Union, Central, and Eastern Europe. ACE primarily invests in Euro denominated investments to support its local currency insurance obligations and required capital levels. ACE’s local currency investment portfolios have strict contractual investment guidelines requiring managers to maintain a high quality and diversified portfolio to both sector and individual issuers. Investment portfolios are monitored daily to ensure investment manager compliance with portfolio guidelines.
Our non-U.S. investment grade fixed income portfolios are currency-matched with the insurance liabilities of our non-U.S. operations. We have 76 percent of our non-U.S. fixed income portfolio denominated in G7 currencies. The average credit quality of our non-U.S. fixed income securities is A and 54 percent of our holdings are rated AAA or guaranteed by governments or quasi-government agencies. Within the context of these investment portfolios, our government and corporate bond holdings are highly diversified across industries and geographies. Issuer limits are based on credit rating (AA— two percent, A— one percent, BBB— 0.5 percent of the total portfolio) and are monitored daily via an internal compliance system. Because of this investment approach we do not have a direct exposure to troubled sovereign borrowers in Europe. We manage our indirect exposure using the same credit rating based investment approach. Accordingly, we do not believe our indirect exposure is material.

82

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the market value and amortized cost of our non-U.S. fixed income portfolio by country/sovereign for non-U.S. government securities at December 31, 2012
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Market Value

 
Amortized Cost

United Kingdom
$
1,068

 
$
1,041

Canada
948

 
921

Republic of Korea
587

 
535

Germany
397

 
389

Japan
367

 
366

France
307

 
295

Province of Ontario
231

 
220

Federative Republic of Brazil
229

 
222

Kingdom of Thailand
220

 
217

Province of Quebec
171

 
161

Commonwealth of Australia
161

 
148

State of Queensland
149

 
139

Federation of Malaysia
132

 
132

Swiss Confederation
120

 
113

People's Republic of China
119

 
116

United Mexican States
110

 
102

State of New South Wales
87

 
82

Taiwan
80

 
78

Socialist Republic of Vietnam
63

 
61

Russian Federation
55

 
53

State of Victoria
54

 
50

Republic of Indonesia
53

 
50

Republic of Colombia
47

 
45

Arab Republic of Egypt
43

 
41

Dominion of New Zealand
42

 
41

Other Non-U.S. Government (1)
726

 
688

Non-U.S. Government Securities
6,566

 
6,306

Eurozone Non-U.S. Corporate (excluding United Kingdom) (2)
2,356

 
2,219

Other Non-U.S. Corporate
5,755

 
5,403

Total
$
14,677

 
$
13,928

(1)  
There are no investments in Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece or Spain. Our gross and net Eurozone Non-U.S. Government securities exposure is the same.
(2)  
Refer to the following table for further detail on Eurozone Non-U.S. Corporate securities. Our gross and net Eurozone Non-U.S. Corporate securities exposure is the same.

83

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the market value and amortized cost of our Eurozone fixed income portfolio (excluding United Kingdom) by industry at December 31, 2012
 
Market Value by Industry
 
Amortized Cost

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Bank

 
Financial

 
Industrial

 
Utility

 
Total

 
 
Netherlands
$
183

 
$
156

 
$
343

 
$
145

 
$
827

 
$
772

France
115

 
36

 
150

 
159

 
460

 
437

Luxembourg
10

 
5

 
225

 
100

 
340

 
320

Germany
227

 
1

 
65

 
8

 
301

 
287

Euro Supranational
200

 

 

 

 
200

 
191

Ireland
12

 
2

 
96

 
15

 
125

 
115

Finland
26

 

 
10

 
3

 
39

 
37

Belgium
3

 

 
31

 

 
34

 
31

Austria
19

 

 
3

 
1

 
23

 
22

Spain
6

 

 

 

 
6

 
6

Portugal

 

 
1

 

 
1

 
1

Eurozone Non-U.S. Corporate Securities
$
801

 
$
200

 
$
924

 
$
431

 
$
2,356

 
$
2,219


The table below summarizes the market value and amortized cost of the top 10 Eurozone bank exposures within our Eurozone fixed income portfolio (excluding United Kingdom) at December 31, 2012
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Market Value

 
Amortized Cost

European Investment Bank
$
167

 
$
160

KFW
146

 
139

Rabobank Nederland NV
112

 
102

Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten
35

 
34

Credit Agricole Groupe
33

 
32

BNP Paribas SA
31

 
29

Erste Abwicklungsanstalt
24

 
23

Groupe BPCE
23

 
22

Nordea Bank AB
23

 
22

Societe Generale SA
20

 
19

The table below summarizes the market value and amortized cost of the top 10 Eurozone corporate exposures within our Eurozone fixed income portfolio (excluding United Kingdom) at December 31, 2012 :
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Market Value

 
Amortized Cost

ING Groep NV
$
94

 
$
89

Electricite de France SA
92

 
87

Intelsat SA
82

 
78

Royal Dutch Shell PLC
75

 
71

Deutsche Telekom AG
72

 
64

LyondellBasell Industries NV
57

 
49

France Telecom SA
43

 
40

Gazprom OAO
40

 
36

General Electric Co
35

 
32

NIBC Holding NV
33

 
32



84

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes our largest exposures to corporate bonds by market value at December 31, 2012 :
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Market Value

JP Morgan Chase & Co
$
455

General Electric Co
438

Goldman Sachs Group Inc
366

Citigroup Inc
348

Bank of America Corp
310

Morgan Stanley
289

Verizon Communications Inc
267

Wells Fargo & Co
266

AT&T INC
217

HSBC Holdings Plc
215

Comcast Corp
166

Mondelez International Inc
165

Anheuser-Busch InBev NV
147

BP Plc
130

Time Warner Cable Inc
128

Duke Energy Corp
126

Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc
125

Barclays Plc
124

Pfizer Inc
122

Philip Morris International Inc
116

Credit Suisse Group
115

Rabobank Nederland NV
112

American Express Co
111

UBS AG
109

Enterprise Products Partners LP
106


85

Table of Contents

___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mortgage-backed securities
Additional details on the mortgage-backed component of our investment portfolio at December 31, 2012 , are provided below:

Mortgage-backed securities
Market Value
 
S&P Credit Rating
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
AAA

 
AA

 
A

 
BBB

 
BB and
below

 
Total

Agency residential mortgage-backed (RMBS)
$

 
$
10,637

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
10,637

Non-agency RMBS
108

 
16

 
36

 
26

 
395

 
581

Commercial mortgage-backed
1,338

 
14

 
12

 
7

 

 
1,371

Total mortgage-backed securities
$
1,446

 
$
10,667

 
$
48

 
$
33

 
$
395

 
$
12,589

Mortgage-backed securities
Amortized Cost
 
S&P Credit Rating
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
AAA

 
AA

 
A

 
BBB

 
BB and
below

 
Total

Agency RMBS
$

 
$
10,188

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
10,188

Non-agency RMBS
107

 
16

 
35

 
26

 
425

 
609

Commercial mortgage-backed
1,255

 
12

 
9

 
6

 

 
1,282

Total mortgage-backed securities
$
1,362

 
$
10,216

 
$
44

 
$
32

 
$
425

 
$
12,079

Our mortgage-backed securities are rated predominantly AA and comprise 22 percent of our fixed income portfolio. This compares with a 32 percent mortgage-backed weighting in representative indices of the U.S. fixed income market at December 31, 2012 . The minimum rating for our initial purchases of mortgage-backed securities is AA for agency mortgages and AAA for non-agency mortgages.
Agency RMBS represent securities which have been issued by Federal agencies (Government National Mortgage Association, Federal National Mortgage Association, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) with implied or explicit government guarantees. These represent 95 percent of our total RMBS portfolio. Our non-agency RMBS are backed primarily by prime collateral and are broadly diversified in over 42,000 loans. This portfolio’s original loan-to-value ratio is approximately 67 percent with an average Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) score of 732 . With this conservative loan-to-value ratio and subordinated collateral of six percent , the cumulative 5-year foreclosure rate would have to rise to 17 percent before principal is significantly impaired. The foreclosure rate of our non-agency RMBS portfolio at December 31, 2012 was seven percent .
Our commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) are rated predominantly AAA, broadly diversified with over 13,000 loans with 30 percent of the portfolio issued before 2006 and 50 percent issued after 2009. The average loan-to-value ratio is approximately 64 percent with a debt service coverage ratio in excess of 1.9 and weighted-average subordinated collateral of 30 percent . The cumulative foreclosure rate would have to rise to 43 percent before principal is impaired. The foreclosure rate of our CMBS portfolio at December 31, 2012 was 1.8 percent .

86

Table of Contents


Below-investment grade corporate fixed income portfolio
Below-investment grade securities have different characteristics than investment grade corporate debt securities. Risk of loss from default by the borrower is greater with below-investment grade securities. Below-investment grade securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer. Also, issuers of below-investment grade securities usually have higher levels of debt and are more sensitive to adverse economic conditions, such as recession or increasing interest rates, than are investment grade issuers. At December 31, 2012 , our corporate fixed income investment portfolio included below-investment grade and non-rated securities which, in total, comprised approximately 14 percent of our fixed income portfolio. Our below-investment grade and non-rated portfolio includes over 1,000 issuers, with the greatest single exposure being $97 million.

We manage high-yield bonds as a distinct and separate asset class from investment grade bonds. The allocation to high-yield bonds is explicitly set by internal management and is targeted to securities in the upper tier of credit quality (BB/B). Our minimum rating for initial purchase is BB/B. Six external investment managers are responsible for high-yield security selection and portfolio construction. Our high-yield managers have a conservative approach to credit selection and very low historical default experience. Holdings are highly diversified across industries and subject to a 1.5 percent issuer limit as a percentage of high-yield allocation. We monitor position limits daily through an internal compliance system. Derivative and structured securities (e.g., credit default swaps and collateralized loan obligations) are not permitted in the high-yield portfolio.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance
The following table presents a composition of our reinsurance recoverable for the periods indicated:

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
December 31 2012

 
 
December 31 2011

Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses (1)
 
 
$
11,399

 
 
$
11,602

Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses and loss expenses (1)
 
 
679

 
 
787

Net reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses
 
 
$
12,078

 
 
$
12,389

Reinsurance recoverable on policy benefits
 
 
$
241

 
 
$
249

(1)  
Net of a provision for uncollectible reinsurance.

We evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and potential reinsurers on a regular basis and also monitor concentrations of credit risk with reinsurers. The provision for uncollectible reinsurance is required principally due to the potential failure of reinsurers to indemnify us, primarily because of disputes under reinsurance contracts and insolvencies. The provision for uncollectible reinsurance is based on a default analysis applied to gross reinsurance recoverables, net of approximately of $2.5 billion and $2.8 billion of collateral at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease in net reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses was primarily due to collections relating to prior period catastrophe events and run-off operations and favorable prior period development, partially offset by increases in crop balances and Superstorm Sandy losses.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Asbestos and environmental (A&E) and other run-off liabilities
Included in ACE's liabilities for losses and loss expenses are amounts for A&E (A&E liabilities). The A&E liabilities principally relate to claims arising from bodily-injury claims related to asbestos products and remediation costs associated with hazardous waste sites. The estimation of ACE's A&E liabilities is particularly sensitive to future changes in the legal, social, and economic environment. ACE has not assumed any such future changes in setting the value of our A&E reserves, which include provisions for both reported and IBNR claims. Refer to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under Item 8, for additional information.

Reserving considerations
For asbestos, ACE faces claims relating to policies issued to manufacturers, distributors, installers, and other parties in the chain of commerce for asbestos and products containing asbestos. Claims can be filed by individual claimants or groups of claimants with the potential for hundreds of individual claimants at one time. Claimants will generally allege damages across an extended time period which may coincide with multiple policies for a single insured.


87

Table of Contents

Environmental claims present exposure for remediation and defense costs associated with the contamination of property as a result of pollution. It is common, especially for larger defendants, to be named as a potentially responsible party at multiple sites.

The following table presents count information by account for asbestos and environmental claims for the periods indicated, for direct policies only:

 
2012

 
2011 (1)

Asbestos (by causative agent)
 
 
 
Open at beginning of year
1,196

 
1,160

Newly reported
65

 
69

Closed or otherwise disposed
203

 
33

Open at end of year
1,058

 
1,196

 
 
 
 
Environmental (by site)
 
 
 
Open at beginning of year
3,733

 
3,639

Newly reported
131

 
147

Closed or otherwise disposed
474

 
53

Open at end of year
3,390

 
3,733

(1) 2011 Asbestos and environmental claims count have been adjusted to present claims in a manner consistent with balances disclosed at December 31, 2012.

Closed or otherwise disposed claims were significantly higher in 2012 , compared with 2011, due to a review of pending cases prior to transferring claim handling responsibilities from a NICO subsidiary back to Century Indemnity Company. Refer to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

The following table shows our gross and net survival ratios for our A&E loss reserves and allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE) reserves at December 31, 2012 and 2011 :
 
2012 Survival Ratios
 
 
2011 Survival Ratios (2)
 
 
3 Year
 
1 Year
 
3 Year
 
1 Year
 
Gross

 
Net

 
Gross

 
Net

 
Gross

 
Net

 
Gross

 
Net

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asbestos
5.2

 
4.5

 
4.2

 
3.1

 
6.2

 
6.7

 
6.7

 
5.9

Environmental
2.5

 
2.1

 
2.7

 
2.0

 
2.9

 
2.9

 
2.5

 
2.2

Total
4.7

 
3.9

 
3.9

 
2.8

 
5.6

 
5.6

 
5.7

 
4.7

(2) 2011 Survival Ratios have been adjusted to present claims in a manner consistent with balances disclosed at December 31, 2012.

The net ratios reflect third-party reinsurance other than the aggregate excess reinsurance provided under the NICO contracts. These survival ratios are calculated by dividing the asbestos or environmental loss and ALAE reserves by the average asbestos or environmental loss and ALAE payments for the three most recent calendar years (3 year survival ratio), and by asbestos or environmental loss and ALAE payments in 2012 (1 year survival ratio). The survival ratios provide only a very rough depiction of reserves and are significantly impacted by a number of factors such as aggressive settlement practices, variations in gross to ceded relationships within the asbestos or environmental claims, and levels of coverage provided. We, therefore, urge caution in using these very simplistic ratios to gauge reserve adequacy and note that the 1 year survival ratios, particularly, are likely to move considerably from year to year for the reasons just described.

The 1 year and 3 year net survival ratios decreased in 2012 primarily due to several large 2012 settlement payments.

88

Table of Contents

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Catastrophe management
We actively monitor our catastrophe risk accumulation around the world.  The following modeled loss information reflects our in-force portfolio at October 1, 2012 and reinsurance program at January 1, 2013.
The table below presents our modeled annual aggregate pre-tax probable maximum loss (PML), net of reinsurance, for 100-year and 250-year return periods for U.S. hurricanes and California earthquakes at December 31, 2012 and 2011 . The table also presents ACE’s corresponding share of pre-tax industry losses for each of the return periods for U.S. hurricanes and California earthquakes at December 31, 2012 and 2011 . For example, according to the model, for the 1-in-100 return period scenario, there is a one percent chance that our losses incurred in any year from U.S. hurricanes could be in excess of $1.7 billion (or six percent of our total shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2012 ). We estimate that at such hypothetical loss levels, ACE’s share of aggregate industry losses would be approximately one percent.
 
 
 
U.S. Hurricanes
 
California Earthquakes
 
 
December 31
 
December 31
 
December 31
 
December 31
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Modeled Annual
Aggregate Net PML
 
ACE
 
% of Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
% of
Industry
 
ACE
 
ACE
 
% of Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
% of
Industry
 
ACE
 (in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
1-in-100
 
$
1,726

 
6
%
 
1.0
%
 
$
1,812

 
$
818

 
3
%
 
2.0
%
 
$
869

1-in-250
 
$
2,293

 
8
%
 
1.0
%
 
$
2,385

 
$
1,055

 
4
%
 
1.7
%
 
$
1,065

The modeling estimates of both ACE and industry loss levels are inherently uncertain owing to key assumptions. First, while the use of third-party catastrophe modeling packages to simulate potential hurricane and earthquake losses is prevalent within the insurance industry, the models are reliant upon significant meteorology, seismology, and engineering assumptions to estimate hurricane and earthquake losses. In particular, modeled hurricane and earthquake events are not always a representation of actual events and ensuing additional loss potential. Second, there is no universal standard in the preparation of insured data for use in the models and the running of the modeling software. Third, we are reliant upon third-party estimates of industry insured exposures and there is significant variation possible around the relationship between our loss and that of the industry following an event. Fourth, we assume that our reinsurance recoveries following an event are fully collectible. These loss estimates do not represent our potential maximum exposures and it is highly likely that our actual incurred losses would vary materially from the modeled estimates.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Natural catastrophe property reinsurance program
ACE’s core property catastrophe reinsurance program provides protection against natural catastrophes impacting its primary property operations (i.e., excluding our Global Reinsurance and Life segments) and consists of two separate towers.
We regularly review our reinsurance protection and corresponding property catastrophe exposures. This may or may not lead to the purchase of additional reinsurance prior to a program’s renewal date. In addition, prior to each renewal date, we consider how much, if any, coverage we intend to buy and we may make material changes to the current structure in light of various factors, including modeled PML assessment at various return periods, reinsurance pricing, our risk tolerance and exposures, and various other structuring considerations.

The following table presents ACE's coverage under its General Catastrophe Treaty for both the North American and International towers, effective for the coverage periods indicated (all dollar amounts are approximate). With respect to Tower 1 - North American, our Core Program renewed on January 1, 2013, for a period of one year. With respect to Tower 2 - International, we renewed the layers of reinsurance protection in excess of $150 million on our Core Program on July 1, 2012, for a period of one year with no significant change in coverage from the expiring program.

89

Table of Contents

 
 
Loss Location
Coverage Period
Layer of Loss
Percentage Placed with Reinsurers
Comments
Notes
Tower 1 - North American
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Program
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North America
100% retained
$0 million - $500 million
Not Applicable
Losses retained by ACE
(a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North America
January 2013 - December 2013
$500 million - $1.1 billion
100%
One reinstatement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Global
January 2013 - December 2013
U.S.earthquake and hurricane
$1.1 billion - $1.175 billion
100%
No reinstatement
(b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North America
January 2013 - December 2013
$1.1 billion - $1.2 billion
100%
All property perils other than earthquake. One reinstatement.
Global layer above inures to the benefit of this layer if Global layer is not exhausted.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a)  
 
Ultimate retention will depend upon the nature of the loss and the interplay between the underlying per risk programs and certain other catastrophe programs purchased by individual business units. These other catastrophe programs have the potential to reduce our effective retention below $500 million.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(b)  
 
This layer covers both U.S. and International risks. As such, it may be exhausted in one region and not available in the other.
 
 
Loss Location
Coverage Period
Layer of Loss
Percentage Placed with Reinsurers
Comments
Notes
Tower 2 - International
July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013 Program (unless otherwise noted)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core Program
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International
100% retained
$0 million - $150 million
Not Applicable
Losses retained by ACE
(c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International (including Alaska and Hawaii)
July 2012 - June 2013
$150 million - $300 million
100%
One reinstatement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International (including Alaska and Hawaii)
July 2012 - June 2013
$300 million - $450 million
100%
One reinstatement. Covers all perils Europe and worldwide earthquake exposure (excludes contiguous U.S.).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International (including Alaska and Hawaii)
July 2012 - June 2013
$450 million - $500 million
100%
One reinstatement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International (including Alaska and Hawaii)
July 2012 - June 2013
$500 million - $550 million
100%
One reinstatement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Global
January 2013 - December 2013
Outside U.S.
$400 million - $475 million or
$550 million - $625 million
100%
No reinstatement
$400 million attachment - all perils other than earthquake and outside of Europe
$550 million attachment - Europe all perils and earthquake outside U.S.
(d)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(c)  
 
Ultimate retention will depend upon the nature of the loss and the interplay between the underlying per risk programs, certain other catastrophe programs purchased by individual business units, and territories and regions around the world.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(d)  
 
This layer covers both U.S. and International risks. As such, it may be exhausted in one region and not available in the other.

90

Table of Contents

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Political Risk, Trade Credit, and Structured Trade Credit
Political risk insurance is a specialized coverage that provides clients with protection against unexpected, catastrophic political or macroeconomic events, primarily in developing markets. We participate in this market through our wholly owned subsidiary Sovereign Risk Insurance Ltd. (Sovereign), and through a unit of our London-based AGM operation. Sovereign is one of the world's leading underwriters of political risk insurance and has a global portfolio spread across more than 100 countries. Its clients include financial institutions, national export credit agencies, leading multilateral agencies, and multinational corporations. AGM writes political risk, trade credit, and structured trade credit business out of underwriting offices in London, England; Hamburg, Germany; New York, New York and Los Angeles, California, in the U.S.; and Singapore.

Our political risk insurance provides protection to commercial lenders against defaults on cross border loans, insulates investors against equity losses, and protects exporters against defaults on contracts. Commercial lenders, our largest client segment, are covered for missed scheduled loan repayments due to acts of confiscation, expropriation or nationalization by the host government, currency inconvertibility or exchange transfer restrictions, or war or other acts of political violence. In addition, in the case of loans to government-owned entities or loans that have a government guarantee, political risk policies cover scheduled payments against risks of non-payment or non-honoring of government guarantees. Equity investors and corporations receive similar coverage to that of lenders, except they are protected against financial losses, inability to repatriate dividends, and physical damage to their operations caused by covered events. Our export contracts protection provides coverage for both exporters and their financing banks against the risk of contract frustration due to government actions, including non-payment by government entities.

AGM's trade credit and structured trade credit businesses cover losses due to insolvency, protracted default, and political risk perils including export and license cancellation. It provides trade credit coverage to larger companies that have sophisticated credit risk management systems, with exposure to multiple customers and that have the ability to self-insure losses up to a certain level through excess of loss coverage. Its structured trade credit business provides coverage to trade finance banks, exporters, and trading companies, with exposure to trade-related financing instruments.

We have implemented structural features in our policies in order to control potential losses within the political risk, trade credit, and structured credit businesses. These include basic loss sharing features that include co-insurance and deductibles, and in the case of trade credit, the use of non-qualifying losses that drop smaller exposures deemed too difficult to assess. Ultimate loss severity is also limited by using waiting periods to enable the insurer and insured to agree on recovery strategies, and the subrogation of the rights of the lender/exporter to the insurer following a claim. We have the option to pay claims over the original loan payment schedule, rather than in a lump sum in order to provide insureds and the insurer additional time to remedy problems and work towards full recoveries. It is important to note that political risk, trade credit, and structured trade credit policies are named peril conditional contracts, not financial guarantees, and claims are only paid after conditions and warranties are fulfilled. Political risk, trade credit, and structured trade credit insurance do not cover currency devaluations, bond defaults, any form of derivatives, movements in overseas equity markets, transactions deemed illegal, or situations where corruption or misrepresentation has occurred, or debt that is not legally enforceable. In addition to assessing and mitigating potential exposure on a policy-by-policy basis, we also have specific risk management measures in place to manage overall exposure and risk. These measures include placing country and individual transaction limits based on country risk and credit ratings, combined single loss limits on multi-country policies, the use of reinsurance protection, and regular modeling and stress-testing of the portfolio.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Crop insurance
We are, and have been since the 1980s, one of the leading writers of crop insurance in the U.S. and have conducted that business through a managing general agent subsidiary of Rain and Hail. We provide protection throughout the U.S. on a variety of crops and are therefore geographically diversified, which reduces the risk of exposure to a single event or a heavy accumulation of losses in any one region. Our crop insurance business comprises two components - Multiple Peril Crop Insurance (MPCI) and crop-hail insurance.

The MPCI program is offered in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The policies cover revenue shortfalls or production losses due to natural causes such as drought, excessive moisture, hail, wind, frost, insects, and disease. Generally, policies have deductibles ranging from 10 percent to 50 percent of the insured's risk. The USDA's Risk Management Agency (RMA) sets the policy terms and conditions, rates and forms, and is also responsible for setting compliance standards. As a participating company, we report all details of policies underwritten to the RMA and are party to a Standard Reinsurance Agreement (SRA). The SRA sets out the relationship between private insurance companies and the Federal Crop Insurance

91

Table of Contents

Corporation (FCIC) concerning the terms and conditions regarding the risks each will bear including the pro-rata and state stop-loss provisions which allows companies to limit the exposure of any one state or group of states on their underwriting results. In addition to the pro-rata and excess of loss reinsurance protections inherent in the SRA, we also purchase third party stop-loss reinsurance for our MPCI business to reduce our exposure. 

Each year the RMA issues a final SRA for the subsequent reinsurance year. In June 2012, the RMA released the 2013 SRA which establishes the terms and conditions for the 2013 reinsurance year (i.e., July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013) that replaced the 2012 SRA.  There were no significant changes in the terms and conditions.

On the MPCI business, we recognize net premiums written as we receive acreage reports from the policyholders on the various crops throughout the U.S. and these reports allow us to determine the actual premium associated with the liability that is being planted. The MPCI program has specific timeframes as to when producers must report acreage to us and in certain cases, the reporting occurs after the close of the respective reinsurance year. Once the net premium written has been booked, the premium is then earned over the growing season for the crops. A majority of the crops that are covered in the program are typically subject to the SRA in effect at the beginning of the year. Given the major crops covered in the program, we typically see a substantial written and earned premium impact in the second and third quarters.

The rating of MPCI premium is determined using a number of factors including commodity prices and related volatility. For instance, in most states the rating for the MPCI Revenue Product for corn includes a factor that is based on the average price in February of the Chicago Board of Trade December corn futures. To the extent that the corn commodity prices are higher in February than they were in the previous February, and all other factors are the same, the increase in corn prices will increase the corn premium year over year.

Our crop-hail program is a private offering. Premium is earned on the crop-hail program over the coverage period of the policy. Given the very short nature of the growing season, most crop-hail business is typically written in the second and third quarters with the earned premium also more heavily occurring during this time frame. We use industry data to develop our own rates and forms for the coverage offered. The policy primarily protects farmers against yield reduction caused by hail and/or fire, and related costs such as transit to storage. We offer various deductibles to allow the grower to partially self-insure for a reduced premium cost. We limit our crop-hail exposures through the use of township liability limits, quota-share reinsurance cessions, and state stop-loss reinsurance on our net retained hail business.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Liquidity
Liquidity is a measure of a company's ability to generate cash flows sufficient to meet the short-term and long-term cash requirements of its business operations. As a holding company, ACE Limited possesses assets that consist primarily of the stock of its subsidiaries and other investments. In addition to net investment income, ACE Limited's cash flows depend primarily on dividends or other statutorily permissible payments. Historically, these dividends and other payments have come from ACE's Bermuda-based operating subsidiaries, which we refer to as our Bermuda subsidiaries. Our consolidated sources of funds consist primarily of net premiums written, fees, net investment income, and proceeds from sales and maturities of investments. Funds are used at our various companies primarily to pay claims, operating expenses, and dividends and to service debt and purchase investments.

We anticipate that positive cash flows from operations (underwriting activities and investment income) should be sufficient to cover cash outflows under most loss scenarios for the near term. Should the need arise, we generally have access to capital markets and available credit facilities. Refer to “Credit Facilities” below for additional information. Our access to funds under existing credit facilities is dependent on the ability of the banks that are parties to the facilities to meet their funding commitments. Our existing credit facilities have remaining terms expiring between 2014 and 2017 and require that we maintain certain financial covenants, all of which we met at December 31, 2012 . Should any of our existing credit providers experience financial difficulty, we may be required to replace credit sources, possibly in a difficult market. There has also been recent consolidation in the banking industry which could lead to increased reliance on and exposure to particular institutions. If we cannot obtain adequate capital or sources of credit on favorable terms, on a timely basis or at all, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected. To date, we have not experienced difficulty accessing any of our credit facilities .

To further ensure the sufficiency of funds to settle unforeseen claims, we hold a certain amount of invested assets in cash and short-term investments. In addition, for certain insurance, reinsurance, or deposit contracts that tend to have relatively large and reasonably predictable cash outflows, we attempt to establish dedicated portfolios of assets that are duration-matched with

92

Table of Contents

the related liabilities. With respect to the duration of our overall investment portfolio, we manage asset durations to both maximize return given current market conditions and provide sufficient liquidity to cover future loss payments. All things being equal, in a low interest rate environment, the overall duration of our fixed maturities tends to be shorter and in a high interest rate environment, such duration tends to be longer. At December 31, 2012 , the average duration of our fixed maturities ( 3.9 years ) is less than the average expected duration of our insurance liabilities ( 5.0 years ).

Despite our safeguards, if paid losses accelerated beyond our ability to fund such paid losses from current operating cash flows, we might need to either liquidate a portion of our investment portfolio or arrange for financing. Potential events causing such a liquidity strain could include several significant catastrophes occurring in a relatively short period of time, large uncollectible reinsurance recoverables on paid losses (as a result of coverage disputes, reinsurers' credit problems or decreases in the value of collateral supporting reinsurance recoverables) or increases in collateral postings under our variable annuity reinsurance business. Because each subsidiary focuses on a more limited number of specific product lines than is collectively available from the ACE Group of Companies, the mix of business tends to be less diverse at the subsidiary level. As a result, the probability of a liquidity strain, as described above, may be greater for individual subsidiaries than when liquidity is assessed on a consolidated basis. If such a liquidity strain were to occur in a subsidiary, we could be required to liquidate a portion of our investments, potentially at distressed prices, as well as be required to contribute capital to the particular subsidiary and/or curtail dividends from the subsidiary to support holding company operations.

The payment of dividends or other statutorily permissible distributions from our operating companies are subject to the laws and regulations applicable to each jurisdiction, as well as the need to maintain capital levels adequate to support the insurance and reinsurance operations, including financial strength ratings issued by independent rating agencies. During 2012 , we were able to meet all of our obligations, including the payments of dividends on our Common Shares with our net cash flows.

We assess which subsidiaries to draw dividends from based on a number of factors. Considerations such as regulatory and legal restrictions as well as the subsidiary's financial condition are paramount to the dividend decision. ACE Limited received dividends of $ 450 million and $560 million from its Bermuda subsidiaries in 2012 and 2011 , respectively.

The payment of any dividends from AGM or its subsidiaries is subject to applicable U.K. insurance laws and regulations.  In addition, the release of funds by Syndicate 2488 to subsidiaries of AGM is subject to regulations promulgated by the Society of Lloyd's. ACE Limited received no dividends from AGM in 2012 and $180 million in 2011 .

The U.S. insurance subsidiaries of ACE INA may pay dividends, without prior regulatory approval, subject to restrictions set out in state law of the subsidiary's domicile (or, if applicable, commercial domicile). ACE INA's international subsidiaries are also subject to insurance laws and regulations particular to the countries in which the subsidiaries operate. These laws and regulations sometimes include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends payable without prior approval of regulatory insurance authorities. ACE Limited did not receive any dividends from ACE INA in 2012 and 2011 . Debt issued by ACE INA is serviced by statutorily permissible distributions by ACE INA's insurance subsidiaries to ACE INA as well as other group resources.
Cash Flows
Our insurance and reinsurance operations provide liquidity in that premiums are received in advance, sometimes substantially in advance, of the time claims are paid. Generally, cash flows are affected by claim payments that, due to the nature of our operations, may comprise large loss payments on a limited number of claims and which can fluctuate significantly from period to period. The irregular timing of these loss payments can create significant variations in cash flows from operations between periods. Refer to “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” for our estimate of future claim payments by period. Sources of liquidity include cash from operations, routine sales of investments, and financing arrangements. The following is a discussion of our cash flows for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 .

The operating cash flows reflect net income for each period, adjusted for non-cash items and changes in working capital.

Our consolidated net cash flows from operating activities were $4.0 billion in 2012 , compared with $3.5 billion in both 2011 and 2010 . Net loss and loss expenses paid were $9.2 billion, $8.9 billion, and $7.4 billion in 2012 , 2011, and 2010 , respectively. Operating cash flows included reinsurance recoveries of $368 million, $304 million and $212 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, from the Brandywine NICO Agreement, which was substantially exhausted as of December 31, 2012.  Refer to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.


93

Table of Contents

Our consolidated net cash flows used for investing activities were $3.4 billion in 2012 , compared with $3.0 billion in 2011 and $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , respectively. Net investing activities for the indicated periods were related primarily to net purchases of fixed maturities. Cash used for investing activities also included acquisitions in 2012, 2011, and 2010. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Our consolidated net cash flows used for financing activities were $550 million in 2012 and $565 million in 2011 , compared with cash flows from financing activities of $ 732 million in 2010 . In 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , financing activities included dividends paid on our Common Shares of $ 815 million, $ 459 million, and $ 435 million, respectively. Financing cash flows included $150 million of net proceeds, net of repayments, from issuance of short-term debt in 2012 and $1.1 billion in 2010, compared with net repayments of $50 million in 2011. Financing cash flows also included share repurchases of $11 million, $195 million, and $235 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Both internal and external forces influence our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Claim settlements, premium levels, and investment returns may be impacted by changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions. In many cases, significant periods of time, ranging up to several years or more, may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to us, and the settlement of the liability for that loss.

In the current low-interest rate environment, we utilize reverse repurchase agreements as a low-cost alternative for short-term funding needs and to address short-term cash timing differences without disrupting our investment portfolio holdings. We subsequently settle these transactions with future operating cash flows. At December 31, 2012 , there were $1.4 billion in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding.

In addition to cash from operations, routine sales of investments, and financing arrangements, we have agreements with a third-party bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs to enhance cash management efficiency during periods of short-term timing mismatches between expected inflows and outflows of cash by currency. The programs allow us to optimize investment income by avoiding portfolio disruption. In each program, participating ACE entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider. Each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency (U.S. dollars) and then notionally pooled. The bank extends overdraft credit to all participating ACE entities as needed, provided that the overall notionally pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero. Actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not commingled between legal entities. ACE entities may incur overdraft balances as a means to address short-term liquidity needs. Any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ACE entity would be guaranteed by ACE Limited (up to $300 million in the aggregate). Our syndicated letter of credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ACE entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool.


94

Table of Contents

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Capital Resources
Capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations. The following table summarizes the components of our capital resources:
 
 
December 31

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
2011

Short-term debt
$
1,401

 
$
1,251

Long-term debt
3,360

 
3,360

Total debt
4,761

 
4,611

Trust preferred securities
309

 
309

Total shareholders’ equity
27,531

 
24,332

Total capitalization
$
32,601

 
$
29,252

Ratio of debt to total capitalization
14.6
%
 
15.8
%
Ratio of debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization
15.6
%
 
16.8
%

Our ratios of debt to total capitalization and debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization have decreased due to the increase in shareholder's equity discussed below.

We believe our financial strength provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain available funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis. Our ability to access the capital markets is dependent on, among other things, market conditions and our perceived financial strength. We have accessed both the debt and equity markets from time to time. We generally maintain the ability to issue certain classes of debt and equity securities via an unlimited SEC shelf registration which is renewed every three years. This allows us capital market access for refinancing as well as for unforeseen or opportunistic capital needs. Our current shelf registration on file with the SEC expires in December 2014.
The following table reports the significant movements in our shareholders’ equity:
 
 
December 31

 (in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

Balance at beginning of year
$
24,332

Net income
2,706

Change in net unrealized appreciation on investments, net of tax
918

Dividends on Common Shares
(704
)
Share-based compensation expense
135

Exercise of stock options
99

Change in cumulative translation, net of tax
81

Repurchase of shares
(7
)
Other movements, net of tax
(29
)
Balance at end of year
$
27,531


As part of our capital management program, in August 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 303 million of ACE’s Common Shares through December 31, 2012. In November 2012, the Board of Directors authorized an extension of this authorization through December 31, 2013. The amount authorized in August 2011 was in addition to the $ 197 million balance remaining under a $ 600 million share repurchase program approved in November 2010. We repurchased $7 million, $132 million, and $303 million of Common Shares in a series of open market transactions in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2012 , $461 million in share repurchase authorizations remained through

95

Table of Contents

December 31, 2013 pursuant to the November 2010, August 2011, and November 2012 Board authorizations. As of December 31, 2012 there were 2,510,878 Common Shares in treasury with a weighted average cost of $63.44 per share. For the period January 1, 2013 through February 27, 2013, we repurchased 1,746,123 Common Shares for a total of $149 million in a series of open market transactions. As of February 27, 2013, $312 million in share repurchase authorizations remained through December 31, 2013.
 
Short-term debt
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, short-term debt includes reverse repurchase agreements totaling $ 1.4 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively.

Long-term debt
At both December 31, 2012 and 2011, our total long-term debt was $ 3.4 billion as described in detail in Note 9 b) and c) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Trust preferred securities
The securities outstanding consist of $300 million of trust preferred securities due 2030, issued by a special purpose entity (a trust) that is wholly owned by us. The sole assets of the special purpose entity are debt instruments issued by one or more of our subsidiaries. The special purpose entity looks to payments on the debt instruments to make payments on the preferred securities. We have guaranteed the payments on these debt instruments. The trustees of the trust include one or more of our officers and at least one independent trustee, such as a trust company. Our officers serving as trustees of the trust do not receive any compensation or other remuneration for their services in such capacity. The full $309 million of outstanding trust preferred securities (calculated as $300 million as discussed above plus our equity share of the trust) is shown on our consolidated balance sheets as a liability. Additional information with respect to the trust preferred securities is contained in Note 9 d ) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Common Shares
Our Common Shares had a par value of CHF 28.89 each at December 31, 2012 .

Under Swiss law, dividends must be stated in Swiss francs though dividend payments are made by ACE in U.S. dollars. Following ACE's redomestication to Switzerland in July 2008 through March 2011, dividends were distributed by way of a par value reduction. At the May 2011 annual general meeting, our shareholders approved dividend distributions from capital contribution reserves (Additional paid-in capital) through the transfer of dividends from Additional paid-in capital to Retained earnings.

In November 2011, the Board of Directors recommended that our shareholders approve a resolution to increase our quarterly dividend 34 percent from $0.35 per share to $0.47 per share for the payment made on January 31, 2012 and the payment made on April 20, 2012. This proposed increase was approved by our shareholders at the January 9, 2012 Extraordinary General Meeting.

At the May 2012 annual general meeting, our shareholders approved an annual dividend distribution for the following year by way of a par value reduction equal to $1.96 per share, or CHF 1.80 per share, calculated using the USD/CHF exchange rate as published in the Wall Street Journal on May 10, 2012.

The annual dividend is payable in four quarterly installments, with each installment equaling $0.49 per share, provided that the Swiss franc equivalent of that amount per share (based on the then-current USD/CHF exchange rate), taken together with the Swiss franc equivalents of all other installments of this annual dividend, will not exceed 150 percent of CHF 1.80 per share (the aggregate distribution cap). If the Swiss franc equivalent of an upcoming dividend installment would cause the aggregate distribution cap to be exceeded, then that dividend installment will be reduced to equal the Swiss franc amount remaining available under the aggregate distribution cap, and the U.S. dollar amount distributed for that installment will be the then applicable U.S. dollar equivalent of the remaining Swiss franc amount. Dividend distributions on Common Shares amounted to CHF 1.91 ( $2.06 ) per share for the year ended December 31, 2012 (including par value reductions of CHF 1.38 per share).


96

Table of Contents

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The table below presents our contractual obligations and commitments including our payments due by period at December 31, 2012 :
 
Payments Due By Period
 
 
 
 
 
2014

 
2016

 


(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Total

2013

and 2015

and 2017

Thereafter

Payment amounts determinable from the respective contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposit liabilities
$
831


$
41


$
62


$
37


$
691

Purchase obligations
304
 
119
 
134
 
51
 

Limited partnerships – funding commitments
1,191
 
367
 
574
 
250
 

Operating leases
501
 
91
 
148

 
111
 
151
Short-term debt
1,401
 
1,401
 

 

 

Long-term debt
3,363
 

 
1,650
 
500
 
1,213
Trust preferred securities
309

 

 

 

 
309
Interest on debt obligations
1,692
 
208
 
352
 
245
 
887
Total obligations in which payment amounts are determinable from the respective contracts
9,592

 
2,227

 
2,920
 
1,194

 
3,251

Payment amounts not determinable from the respective contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Estimated gross loss payments under insurance and reinsurance contracts
37,946

 
9,158
 
9,585
 
5,621
 
13,582
Estimated payments for future life and annuity policy benefits
11,745
 
355
 
716
 
712
 
9,962
Total contractual obligations and commitments
$
59,283


$
11,740


$
13,221


$
7,527


$
26,795


The above table excludes the following items:

Pension obligations: Minimum funding requirements for our pension obligations are immaterial. Subsequent funding commitments are apt to vary due to many factors and are difficult to estimate at this time. Refer to Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits: The liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest, was $26 million at December 31, 2012 . We recognize accruals for interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in Income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2012 , we had $12 million in liabilities for income tax-related interest and penalties in our consolidated balance sheets. We are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate for the timing of cash settlement with respect to these liabilities. Refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

We have no other significant contractual obligations or commitments not reflected in the table above.

Deposit liabilities
Deposit liabilities include reinsurance deposit liabilities of $283 million and contract holder deposit funds of $548 million at December 31, 2012 . The reinsurance deposit liabilities arise from contracts we sold for which there is not a significant transfer of risk. At contract inception, the deposit liability is equal to net cash received. An accretion rate is established based on actuarial estimates whereby the deposit liability is increased to the estimated amount payable over the term of the contract. The deposit accretion rate is the rate of return required to fund expected future payment obligations. We periodically reassess the estimated ultimate liability and related expected rate of return. Any resulting changes to the amount of the deposit liability are reflected as an adjustment to earnings to reflect the cumulative effect on the period the contract has been in force, and by an adjustment to the future accretion rate of the liability over the remaining estimated contract term. Additional information with respect to deposit liabilities is contained in Note 1 k ) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

97

Table of Contents


Purchase obligations
We are party to enforceable and legally binding agreements to purchase certain services. Purchase obligations in the table primarily comprise audit fees and agreements with vendors to purchase system software administration and maintenance services.

Limited partnerships - funding commitments
In connection with our investments in limited partnerships, we have commitments that may require funding over the next several years. The timing of the payment of these commitments is uncertain and will differ from our estimated timing in the table.

Operating lease commitments
We lease office space in most countries in which we operate under operating leases that expire at various dates through February 2033. We renew and enter into new leases in the ordinary course of business as required.

Estimated gross loss payments under insurance and reinsurance contracts
We are obligated to pay claims under insurance and reinsurance contracts for specified loss events covered under those contracts. Such loss payments represent our most significant future payment obligation as a P&C insurance and reinsurance company. In contrast to other contractual obligations, cash payments are not determinable from the terms specified within the contract. For example, we do not ultimately make a payment to our counterparty for many insurance and reinsurance contracts (i.e., when a loss event has not occurred) and if a payment is to be made, the amount and timing cannot be determined from the contract. In the table above, we estimate payments by period relating to our gross liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses included in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 , and do not take into account reinsurance recoverable. These estimated loss payments are inherently uncertain and the amount and timing of actual loss payments are likely to differ from these estimates and the differences could be material. Given the numerous factors and assumptions involved in both estimates of loss and loss expense reserves and related estimates as to the timing of future loss and loss expense payments in the table above, differences between actual and estimated loss payments will not necessarily indicate a commensurate change in ultimate loss estimates.

Estimated payments for future life and annuity policy benefits
We establish reserves for future policy benefits for life and annuity contracts.  The amounts in the table are gross of fees or premiums due from the underlying contracts.  The liability for future policy benefits for life and annuity contracts presented in our balance sheet is discounted and reflected net of fees or premiums due from the underlying contracts. Accordingly, the estimated amounts in the table exceed the liability for future policy benefits for life and annuity contracts presented in our balance sheet. Payment amounts related to these reserves must be estimated and are not determinable from the contract. Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing and amount of these payments, actual results could materially differ from the estimates in the table.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Credit Facilities
As our Bermuda subsidiaries are non-admitted insurers and reinsurers in the U.S., the terms of certain U.S. insurance and reinsurance contracts require them to provide collateral, which can be in the form of letters of credit (LOCs). In addition, AGM is required to satisfy certain U.S. regulatory trust fund requirements which can be met by the issuance of LOCs. LOCs may also be used for general corporate purposes and to provide underwriting capacity as funds at Lloyd's.

The following table shows our main credit facilities by credit line, usage, and expiry date at December 31, 2012 :
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Credit Line (1)

 
Usage

 
Expiry Date
Syndicated Letter of Credit Facility
$
1,000

 
$
619

 
Nov. 2017
Bilateral Letter of Credit Facility
500

 
500

 
June 2014
  Funds at Lloyds's Capital Facilities (2)
425

 
400

 
Dec. 2017
Total
$
1,925

 
$
1,519

 
 
(1)  
Certain facilities are guaranteed by ACE Limited.
(2)  
Supports ACE Global Markets underwriting capacity for Lloyd's Syndicate 2488 (see discussion below).


98

Table of Contents

In November 2012, we renewed our syndicated letter of credit facility used for working capital and other general corporate purposes. This agreement provides up to $1 billion of availability (adjustable to $1.5 billion upon consent of the issuers) for letters of credit, of which up to $300 million may be used for revolving loans. This facility replaces the $1 billion syndicated letter of credit facility and $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility that expired in November 2012.  

In November 2012, we amended the LOC facility agreements supporting AGM underwriting capacity for Syndicate 2488 which increased the aggregate amount of LOCs permitted to be issued from $400 million to $425 million and extended the expiry date from December 2015 to December 2017.  We will continue to use most of the LOCs issued under the LOC agreements primarily to support the ongoing Funds at Lloyd's requirements of Syndicate 2488, but also for other general corporate purposes.

It is anticipated that our commercial facilities will be renewed on expiry but such renewals are subject to the availability of credit from banks utilized by ACE. In the event that such credit support is insufficient, we could be required to provide alternative security to clients. This could take the form of additional insurance trusts supported by our investment portfolio or funds withheld using our cash resources. The value of LOCs required is driven by, among other things, statutory liabilities reported by variable annuity guarantee reinsurance clients, loss development of existing reserves, the payment pattern of such reserves, the expansion of business, and loss experience of such business.

The facilities in the table above require that we maintain certain covenants, all of which have been met at December 31, 2012 . These covenants include:

(i)
Maintenance of a minimum consolidated net worth in an amount not less than the “Minimum Amount”. For the purpose of this calculation, the Minimum Amount is an amount equal to the sum of the base amount (currently $17.5 billion) plus 25 percent of consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter, ending after the date on which the current base amount became effective, plus 50 percent of any increase in consolidated net worth during the same period, attributable to the issuance of Common and Preferred Shares. The Minimum Amount is subject to an annual reset provision.
(ii)
Maintenance of a maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of not greater than 0.35 to 1. Under this covenant, debt does not include trust preferred securities or mezzanine equity, except where the ratio of the sum of trust preferred securities and mezzanine equity to total capitalization is greater than 15 percent. In this circumstance, the amount greater than 15 percent would be included in the debt to total capitalization ratio.

At December 31, 2012 , (a) the minimum consolidated net worth requirement under the covenant described in (i) above was $17.8 billion and our actual consolidated net worth as calculated under that covenant was $24.9 billion and (b) our ratio of debt to total capitalization was 0.146 to 1, which is below the maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of 0.35 to 1 as described in (ii) above.

Our failure to comply with the covenants under any credit facility would, subject to grace periods in the case of certain covenants, result in an event of default. This could require us to repay any outstanding borrowings or to cash collateralize LOCs under such facility. Our failure to repay material financial obligations, as well as our failure with respect to certain other events expressly identified, would result in an event of default under one or more of the facilities.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ratings
ACE Limited and its subsidiaries are assigned credit and financial strength (insurance) ratings from internationally recognized rating agencies, including S&P, A.M. Best, Moody's, and Fitch. The ratings issued on our companies by these agencies are announced publicly and are available directly from the agencies. Our internet site, www.acegroup.com, also contains some information about our ratings, which can be found under the Investor Information tab but such information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Financial strength ratings reflect the rating agencies' opinions of a company's claims paying ability. Independent ratings are one of the important factors that establish our competitive position in the insurance markets. The rating agencies consider many factors in determining the financial strength rating of an insurance company, including the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business operations of the company. These ratings are based upon factors relevant to policyholders, agents, and intermediaries and are not directed toward the protection of investors. Such ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities.


99

Table of Contents

Credit ratings assess a company's ability to make timely payments of principal and interest on its debt.

It is possible that, in the future, one or more of the rating agencies may reduce our existing ratings. If one or more of our ratings were downgraded, we could incur higher borrowing costs and our ability to access the capital markets could be impacted. In addition, our insurance and reinsurance operations could be adversely impacted by a downgrade in our financial strength ratings, including a possible reduction in demand for our products in certain markets. For example, the AGM capital facility requires that collateral be posted if the S&P public debt rating of ACE falls below BBB+. Also, we have insurance and reinsurance contracts which contain rating triggers. In the event the S&P or A.M. Best financial strength ratings of ACE fall, we may be faced with the cancellation of premium or be required to post collateral on our underlying obligation associated with this premium. We estimate that at December 31, 2012 , a one-notch downgrade of our S&P or A.M. Best financial strength ratings would result in an immaterial loss of premium or requirement for collateral to be posted.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Recent accounting pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.


ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management
Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments. We are exposed to potential losses from various market risks including changes in interest rates, equity prices, and foreign currency exchange rates. Further, through writing the GLB and GMDB products, we are exposed to volatility in the equity and credit markets, as well as interest rates. Our investment portfolio consists primarily of fixed income securities, denominated in both U.S. dollars and foreign currencies, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The majority of our fixed income portfolio is classified as available for sale. The effect of market movements on our available for sale investment portfolio impacts Net income (through Net realized gains (losses)) when securities are sold or when we record an OTTI charge in Net income. Changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates will have an immediate effect on shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and in certain instances, Net income. From time to time, we also use investment derivative instruments such as futures, options, swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts to manage the duration of our investment portfolio and foreign currency exposures and also to obtain exposure to a particular financial market. At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , our notional exposure to investment derivative instruments was $7.1 billion and $14.8 billion , respectively. These instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and are sensitive to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and equity security prices. In addition, as part of our investing activity, we purchase to be announced mortgage backed securities (TBAs). Changes in the fair value of TBAs are included in Net realized gains (losses) and therefore, have an immediate effect on both our Net income and Shareholders' equity.

We seek to mitigate market risk using a number of techniques, including maintaining and managing the assets and liabilities of our international operations consistent with the foreign currencies of the underlying insurance and reinsurance businesses, thereby limiting exchange rate risk to net assets denominated in foreign currencies.
The following is a discussion of our primary market risk exposures at December 31, 2012 . Our policies to address these risks in 2012 were not materially different from 2011 . We do not currently anticipate significant changes in our primary market risk exposures or in how those exposures are managed in future reporting periods based upon what is known or expected to be in effect in future reporting periods.
Interest rate risk - fixed income portfolio and debt obligations
Our fixed income portfolio and debt obligations have exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in investment values attributable to interest rate changes are mitigated by corresponding and partially offsetting changes in the economic value of our insurance reserves and debt obligations. We monitor this exposure through periodic reviews of our asset and liability positions.

100

Table of Contents

The following table presents the impact at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , on the fair value of our fixed income portfolio of a hypothetical increase in interest rates of 100 bps applied instantly across the U.S. yield curve (an immediate time horizon was used as this presents the worst case scenario):

(in billions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
 
2012

 
 
2011

Fair value of fixed income portfolio
 
$
57.2

 
 
$
52.9

Pre-tax impact of 100 bps increase in interest rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
In dollars
 
$
2.2

 
 
$
1.9

 
As a percentage of total fixed income portfolio at fair value
 
3.9
%
 
 
3.7
%

Changes in interest rates will have an immediate effect on Comprehensive income and Shareholders' equity but will not ordinarily have an immediate effect on Net income. Variations in market interest rates could produce significant changes in the timing of prepayments due to prepayment options available. For these reasons, actual results could differ from those reflected in the tables.
Although our debt and trust preferred securities (collectively referred to as debt obligations) are reported at amortized cost and not adjusted for fair value changes, changes in interest rates could have a material impact on their fair value, albeit there is no immediate impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The following table presents the impact at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , on the fair value of our debt obligations of a hypothetical decrease in interest rates of 100 bps applied instantly across the U.S. yield curve (an immediate time horizon was used as this presents the worst case scenario):

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
 
2012

 
 
2011

Fair value of debt obligations
 
$
5,763

 
 
$
5,478

Impact of 100 bps decrease in interest rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
In dollars
 
$
199

 
 
$
252

 
As a percentage of total debt obligations at fair value
 
3.5
%
 
 
4.6
%

Equity price risk - equity portfolio
Our portfolio of equity securities, which we carry on our balance sheet at fair value, has exposure to price risk. This risk is defined as the potential loss in fair value resulting from adverse changes in stock prices. In addition, we attain exposure to the equity markets through the use of derivative instruments, which also have exposure to price risk. Our global equity portfolio, excluding our preferred equity securities and strategic emerging debt portfolio, is correlated with the MSCI World Index and changes in that index would approximate the impact on our portfolio. Our international equity portfolio has exposure to a broad range of non-U.S. equity markets.

The following table presents more information on our exposure to equity price risk at December 31, 2012 and 2011 :
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
2012

 
 
2011

Fair value of equity securities
 
 
$
744

 
 
$
647

Pre-tax impact of 10 percent decline in market prices for equity exposures
 
 
$
74

 
 
$
65


Changes in the fair value of our equity portfolio are recorded as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and are included as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income in Shareholders' equity.

Foreign currency exchange rate risk
Many of our non-U.S. companies maintain both assets and liabilities in local currencies. Therefore, foreign currency exchange rate risk is generally limited to net assets denominated in those foreign currencies. Foreign currency exchange rate risk is

101

Table of Contents

reviewed as part of our risk management process. Locally required capital levels are invested in home currencies in order to satisfy regulatory requirements and to support local insurance operations regardless of currency fluctuations. The principal currencies creating foreign currency exchange rate risk for us are the British pound sterling, the euro, the yen, the Canadian dollar, and the Australian dollar.

The following table presents more information on our exposure to foreign exchange rate risk at December 31, 2012 and 2011 :

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
2012

 
 
2011

Fair value of net assets denominated in foreign currencies
$
5,212

 
 
$
3,506

As a percentage of total net assets
18.9
%
 
 
14.4
%
Pre-tax impact on shareholders' equity of a hypothetical 10 percent strengthening of the U.S. dollar
$
470

 
 
$
339

Reinsurance of GMDB and GLB guarantees
Our net income is directly impacted by changes in the benefit reserves calculated in connection with the reinsurance of variable annuity guarantees, primarily GMDB and GLB. The benefit reserves are calculated in accordance with the guidance related to accounting and reporting by insurance enterprises for certain non-traditional long-duration contracts and for separate accounts. Changes in the benefit reserves are reflected as policy benefits expense, which is included in life underwriting income. In addition, our net income is directly impacted by the change in the fair value of the GLB liability (FVL), which is classified as a derivative for accounting purposes. The FVL established for a GLB reinsurance contract represents the difference between the fair value of the contract and the benefit reserves. Changes in the FVL, net of associated changes in the calculated benefit reserves, are reflected as realized gains or losses.
ACE views its variable annuity reinsurance business as having a similar risk profile to that of catastrophe reinsurance with the probability of long-term economic loss relatively small, at the time of pricing. Adverse changes in market factors and policyholder behavior will have an impact on both life underwriting income and net income. When evaluating these risks, we expect to be compensated for taking both the risk of a cumulative long-term economic net loss, as well as the short-term accounting variations caused by these market movements. Therefore, we evaluate this business in terms of its long-term economic risk and reward.
At December 31, 2012 , management established benefit reserves based on the benefit ratio calculated using assumptions reflecting management’s best estimate of the future performance of the variable annuity line of business. Management exercises judgment in determining the extent to which short-term market movements impact the benefit reserves. The benefit reserves are based on the calculation of a long-term benefit ratio (or loss ratio) for the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance. Despite the long-term nature of the risk, the benefit ratio calculation is impacted by short-term market movements that may be judged by management to be temporary or transient. Management’s best estimate reflected a judgment that the equity markets will exhibit average growth over the next several years. Management regularly examines both quantitative and qualitative analysis and for the year ended December 31, 2012 , determined that no change to the benefit ratio was warranted. The benefit ratio used to establish the benefit reserves at December 31, 2012 , has averaged less than 1/4 standard deviation from the calculated benefit ratios, averaging the periodic results from a 2 -year rolling period ending December 31, 2012 .
The guidance requires us to “regularly evaluate estimates used and adjust the liability balance... if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier assumptions should be revised.” ACE evaluates its estimates regularly and management uses judgment to determine the extent to which the assumptions underlying the benefit ratio calculation used to establish benefit reserves should be adjusted. The benefit ratio will be calculated based on management’s expectation for the short-term and long-term performance of the variable annuity guarantee liability. Management’s quantitative analysis includes a review of the differential between the benefit ratio used at the most recent valuation date and the benefit ratio calculated on subsequent dates. The differential is measured in terms of the standard deviation of the distribution of benefit ratios (reflecting 1,000 stochastic scenarios) calculated on subsequent dates.
The benefit reserves and FVL calculations are directly affected by market factors, including equity levels, interest rate levels, credit risk, and implied volatilities, as well as policyholder behaviors, such as annuitization and lapse rates. The tables below assume no changes to the benefit ratio used to establish the benefit reserves at December 31, 2012 and show the sensitivity, at December 31, 2012 , of the FVL associated with the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio. In addition, the tables below present the sensitivity of the fair value of specific derivative instruments held (hedge value) to partially offset the risk in

102

Table of Contents

the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio. The tables below are estimates of the sensitivities to instantaneous changes in economic inputs or actuarial assumptions.
The tables below do not reflect the expected quarterly run rate of net income generated by the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio if markets remain unchanged during the period. All else equal, if markets remain unchanged during the period, the Gross FVL will increase, resulting in a realized loss. The realized loss occurs primarily because, during the period, we will collect premium while paying little or no claims on our GLB reinsurance (since most policies are not eligible to annuitize until 2013 or later). This increases the Gross FVL because future premiums are lower by the amount collected in the quarter, and also because future claims are discounted for a shorter period. We refer to this increase in Gross FVL as “timing effect”. The unfavorable impact of timing effect on our Gross FVL in a quarter is not reflected in the sensitivity tables below. For this reason, when using the tables below to estimate the sensitivity of Gross FVL in the first quarter 2013 to various changes, it is necessary to assume an additional $30 million to $60 million increase in Gross FVL and realized losses. However, the impact to Net income is substantially mitigated because the majority of this realized loss is offset by the positive quarterly run rate of life underwriting income generated by the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio if markets remain unchanged during the period. Note that both the timing effect and the quarterly run rate of life underwriting income change over time as the book ages.

103

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Shock
Worldwide Equity Shock
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
+10
%
 
Flat

 
-10
 %
 
-20
 %
 
-30
 %
 
-40
 %
+100 bps
(Increase)/decrease in Gross FVL
$
606

 
$
348

 
$
34

 
$
(351
)
 
$
(793
)
 
$
(1,292
)
 
Increase/(decrease) in hedge value
(239
)
 
(8
)
 
226

 
463

 
703

 
947

 
Increase/(decrease) in net income
$
367

 
$
340

 
$
260

 
$
112

 
$
(90
)
 
$
(345
)
Flat
(Increase)/decrease in Gross FVL
$
319

 
$

 
$
(389
)
 
$
(838
)
 
$
(1,340
)
 
$
(1,884
)
 
Increase/(decrease) in hedge value
(236
)
 
(4
)
 
230

 
468

 
709

 
953

 
Increase/(decrease) in net income
$
83

 
$
(4
)
 
$
(159
)
 
$
(370
)
 
$
(631
)
 
$
(931
)
-100 bps
(Increase)/decrease in Gross FVL
$
(110
)
 
$
(504
)
 
$
(960
)
 
$
(1,469
)
 
$
(2,015
)
 
$
(2,584
)
 
Increase/(decrease) in hedge value
(234
)
 
(1
)
 
234

 
473

 
714

 
959

 
Increase/(decrease) in net income
$
(344
)
 
$
(505
)
 
$
(726
)
 
$
(996
)
 
$
(1,301
)
 
$
(1,625
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sensitivities to Other Economic Variables
AA-rated Credit Spreads
 
 
 Interest Rate Volatility
 
 
 Equity Volatility
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
+100

 
--100

 
+2
 %
 
-2
 %
 
+2
 %
 
-2
 %
(Increase)/decrease in Gross FVL
$
145

 
$
(152
)
 
$
(3
)
 
$

 
$
(22
)
 
$
20

Increase/(decrease) in hedge value

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
(8
)
Increase/(decrease) in net income
$
145

 
$
(152
)
 
$
(3
)
 
$

 
$
(23
)
 
$
12

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sensitivities to Actuarial Assumptions
 
 
 
 
Mortality
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
+20
 %
 
+10
 %
 
-10
 %
 
-20
 %
(Increase)/decrease in Gross FVL
 
 
 
 
$
35

 
$
17

 
$
(18
)
 
$
(36
)
Increase/(decrease) in hedge value
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

Increase/(decrease) in net income
 
 
 
 
$
35

 
$
17

 
$
(18
)
 
$
(36
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lapses
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
+50
 %
 
+25
 %
 
-25
 %
 
-50
 %
(Increase)/decrease in Gross FVL
 
 
 
 
$
380

 
$
209

 
$
(251
)
 
$
(554
)
Increase/(decrease) in hedge value
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

Increase/(decrease) in net income
 
 
 
 
$
380

 
$
209

 
$
(251
)
 
$
(554
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annuitization
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
+50
 %
 
+25
 %
 
-25
 %
 
-50
 %
(Increase)/decrease in Gross FVL
 
 
 
 
$
(344
)
 
$
(197
)
 
$
245

 
$
545

Increase/(decrease) in hedge value
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

Increase/(decrease) in net income
 
 
 
 
$
(344
)
 
$
(197
)
 
$
245

 
$
545

The above tables assume equity shocks impact all global equity markets equally and that the interest rate shock is a parallel shift in the U.S. yield curve. Our liabilities are sensitive to global equity markets in the following proportions: 70 percent— 80 percent U.S. equity, 10 percent— 20 percent international equity ex-Japan, 5 percent— 15 percent Japan equity. Our current hedge portfolio is sensitive to global equity markets in the following proportions: 100 percent U.S. equity. We would suggest using the S&P 500 index as a proxy for U.S. equity, the MSCI EAFE index as a proxy for international equity, and the TOPIX as a proxy for Japan equity.
Our liabilities are also sensitive to global interest rates at various points on the yield curve, mainly the U.S. Treasury curve in the following proportions: 5 percent— 15 percent short-term rates (maturing in less than 5 years), 20 percent— 30 percent medium-term rates (maturing between 5 years and 10 years, inclusive), and 60 percent— 70 percent long-term rates (maturing beyond 10 years). A change in AA-rated credit spreads (AA-rated credit spreads are a proxy for both our own credit spreads and the credit spreads of the ceding insurers) impacts the rate used to discount cash flows in the fair value model. The hedge

104

Table of Contents

sensitivity is from December 31, 2012 market levels and includes the impact of an adjustment to the hedge portfolio made subsequent to that date.
The above sensitivities are not directly additive because changes in one factor will affect the sensitivity to changes in other factors. Also, the sensitivities do not scale linearly and may be proportionally greater for larger movements in the market factors. Sensitivities may also vary due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. The calculation of the FVL is based on internal models that include assumptions regarding future policyholder behavior, including lapse, annuitization, and asset allocation. These assumptions impact both the absolute level of the FVL as well as the sensitivities to changes in market factors shown above. Additionally, actual sensitivity of our net income may differ from those disclosed in the tables above due to differences between short-term market movements and management judgment regarding the long-term assumptions implicit in our benefit ratios. Furthermore, the sensitivities above could vary by multiples of the sensitivities in the tables above.
Variable Annuity Net Amount at Risk

a) Reinsurance covering the GMDB risk only
The table below presents the net amount at risk at December 31, 2012 following an immediate change in equity market levels, assuming all global equity markets are impacted equally.
 
 
Equity Shock
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages)
+20
%
 
Flat

 
-20
 %
 
-40
 %
 
-60
 %
 
-80
 %
GMDB net amount at risk
$
1,068

 
$
1,314

 
$
1,853

 
$
2,187

 
$
2,112

 
$
1,798

Claims at 100% immediate mortality
702

 
495

 
333

 
303

 
272

 
242

At December 31, 2012 and 2011 the net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering the GMDB risk only was $1.3 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively.
For reinsurance programs covering the GMDB risk only, the net amount at risk is defined as the present value of future claim payments under the following assumptions:
policy account values and guaranteed values are fixed at the valuation date ( December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively);
there are no lapses or withdrawals;
mortality according to 100 percent of the Annuity 2000 mortality table;
future claims are discounted in line with the discounting assumption used in the calculation of the benefit reserve averaging between 1.0 percent and 2.0 percent; and
reinsurance coverage ends at the earlier of the maturity of the underlying variable annuity policy or the reinsurance treaty.
The total claim amount payable on reinsurance programs covering the GMDB risk only, if all the cedants’ policyholders were to die immediately at December 31, 2012 was approximately $495 million. This takes into account all applicable reinsurance treaty claim limits.
The treaty claim limits function as a ceiling on the net amount at risk as equity markets fall. In addition, the claims payable if all of the policyholders were to die immediately declines as equity markets fall due to the specific nature of these claim limits, many of which are annual claim limits calculated as a percentage of the reinsured account value. There is also some impact due to a small portion of the GMDB reinsurance under which claims are positively correlated to equity markets (claims decrease as equity markets fall).

105

Table of Contents

b) Reinsurance covering the GLB risk only
The table below presents the net amount at risk at December 31, 2012 following an immediate change in equity market levels, assuming all global equity markets are impacted equally.
 
 
Equity Shock
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages)
+20
%
 
Flat

 
-20
 %
 
-40
 %
 
-60
 %
 
-80
 %
GLB net amount at risk
$
154

 
$
445

 
$
1,073

 
$
1,872

 
$
2,478

 
$
2,625

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering the GLB risk only was $445 million and $380 million, respectively.
For reinsurance programs covering the GLB risk only, the net amount at risk is defined as the present value of future claim payments under the following assumptions:
policy account values and guaranteed values are fixed at the valuation date ( December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively);
there are no deaths, lapses, or withdrawals;
policyholders annuitize at a frequency most disadvantageous to ACE (in other words, annuitization at a level that maximizes claims taking into account the treaty limits) under the terms of the reinsurance contracts;
for annuitizing policyholders, the GMIB claim is calculated using interest rates in line with those used in calculating the reserve;
future claims are discounted in line with the discounting assumption used in the calculation of the benefit reserve averaging between 3.5 percent and 4.5 percent; and
reinsurance coverage ends at the earlier of the maturity of the underlying variable annuity policy or the reinsurance treaty.
The treaty claim limits cause the net amount at risk to increase at a declining rate as equity markets fall.
c) Reinsurance covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders
The table below presents the net amount at risk at December 31, 2012 following an immediate change in equity market levels, assuming all global equity markets are impacted equally.
 
Equity Shock
 (in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages)
+20
%
 
Flat

 
-20
 %
 
-40
 %
 
-60
 %
 
-80
 %
GMDB net amount at risk
$
77

 
$
116

 
$
161

 
$
203

 
$
242

 
$
285

GLB net amount at risk
270

 
655

 
1,233

 
1,866

 
2,386

 
2,684

Claims at 100% immediate mortality
312

 
640

 
959

 
1,192

 
1,390

 
1,581

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the GMDB net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders was $116 million and $182 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the GLB net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders was $655 million and $998 million, respectively.
These net amounts at risk reflect the interaction between the two types of benefits on any single policyholder (eliminating double-counting), and therefore the net amounts at risk should be considered additive.
In addition, the table presents the total claim amount payable on reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders, if all of the cedants’ policyholders were to die immediately at December 31, 2012 . This takes into account all applicable reinsurance treaty claim limits. Although this calculation shows an increase in death claims resulting from 100 percent immediate mortality of all policyholders, the GLB claims would be zero in this scenario.
For reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders, the net amount at risk is defined as the present value of future claim payments under the following assumptions:

106

Table of Contents

policy account values and guaranteed values are fixed at the valuation date ( December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively);
there are no lapses, or withdrawals;
mortality according to 100 percent of the Annuity 2000 mortality table;
policyholders annuitize at a frequency most disadvantageous to ACE (in other words, annuitization at a level that maximizes claims taking into account the treaty limits) under the terms of the reinsurance contracts;
for annuitizing policyholders, the GMIB claim is calculated using interest rates in line with those used in calculating the reserve;
future claims are discounted in line with the discounting assumption used in the calculation of the benefit reserve averaging between 1.5 percent and 2.5 percent; and
reinsurance coverage ends at the earlier of the maturity of the underlying variable annuity policy or the reinsurance treaty.
The treaty limits control the increase in the GMDB net amount at risk as equity markets fall. The GMDB net amount at risk continues to grow as equity markets fall because most of these reinsurance treaties do not have annual claim limits calculated as a percentage of the underlying account value.
The treaty limits cause the GLB net amount at risk to increase at a declining rate as equity markets fall.


ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements and supplementary data required by Regulation S-X are included in this Form 10-K commencing on page F-1.


ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There have been no changes in, or any disagreements with, accountants on accounting and financial disclosure within the two years ended December 31, 2012 .


ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures

ACE’s management, with the participation of ACE’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of ACE’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of December 31, 2012 . Based upon that evaluation, ACE’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that ACE’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in allowing information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 to be recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to ACE’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in ACE’s internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ACE’s internal controls over financial reporting. ACE's management report on internal control over financial reporting is included on page F-3 and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's audit report is included on page F-4.


ITEM 9B. Other Information

Item not applicable.



107

Table of Contents

PART III





ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information pertaining to this item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Election of Directors”, “Corporate Governance - Director Independence and Other Information,” “Corporate Governance - Did Our Officers and Directors Comply with Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting in 2012 ?”, “Corporate Governance - How Are Directors Nominated?”, and “Corporate Governance - The Committees of the Board - The Audit Committee” of the definitive proxy statement for the 2013 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to regulation 14A. Also incorporated herein by reference is the text under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” appearing at the end of Part I of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Code of Ethics
ACE has adopted a Code of Conduct, which sets forth standards by which all ACE employees, officers, and directors must abide as they work for ACE. ACE has posted this Code of Conduct on its Internet site (www.acegroup.com, under Investor Information / Corporate Governance / Integrity First: The ACE Code of Conduct). ACE intends to disclose on its Internet site any amendments to, or waivers from, its Code of Conduct that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to the rules of the SEC or the New York Stock Exchange.


ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

This item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Executive Compensation” of the definitive proxy statement for the 2013 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.


ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

This item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Approval of ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan as Amended Through the Sixth Amendment” and “Information About our Share Ownership” of the definitive proxy statement for the 2013 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.


ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

This item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Corporate Governance - What Is Our Related Party Transactions Approval Policy and What Procedures Do We Use to Implement It?”, “Corporate Governance - What Related Person Transactions Do We Have?”, and “Corporate Governance - Director Independence and Other Information” of the definitive proxy statement for the 2013 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.


ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

This item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Election of Auditors - Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (United States) as independent registered public accounting firm for purposes of United States securities law reporting for the year ending December 31, 2013” of the definitive proxy statement for the 2013 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.


108


PART IV


ITEM 15.      Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Financial Statements, Schedules, and Exhibits     
1.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
2.
Financial Statement Schedules
 
Other schedules have been omitted as they are not applicable to ACE, or the required information has been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.
3.
Exhibits

 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
3.1
 
Articles of Association of the Company, as amended and restated
 
8-K
 
3
 
December 20, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.2
 
Organizational Regulations of the Company, as amended and restated
 
8-K
 
3
 
August 15, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.1
 
Articles of Association of the Company, as amended and restated
 
8-K
 
4
 
December 20, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2
 
Organizational Regulations of the Company, as amended and restated
 
8-K
 
4
 
August 15, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.3
 
Specimen share certificate representing Common Shares
 
8-K
 
4.3
 
July 18, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.4
 
Form of 2.6 percent Senior Notes due 2015
 
8-K
 
4.1
 
November 23, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.5
 
Indenture, dated March 15, 2002, between ACE Limited and Bank One Trust Company, N.A.
 
8-K
 
4.1
 
March 22, 2002
 
 

109



 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
4.6
 
Senior Indenture, dated August 1, 1999, among ACE INA Holdings, Inc., ACE Limited and Bank One, N.A. (formerly The First National Bank of Chicago), as trustee
 
S-3/A
 
4.5
 
August 12, 1999
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.7
 
Indenture, dated November 30, 1999, among ACE INA Holdings, Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
 
10-K
 
10.38
 
March 29, 2000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.8
 
Indenture, dated December 1, 1999, among ACE INA Holdings, Inc., ACE Limited and Bank One Trust Company, National Association, as trustee
 
10-K
 
10.41
 
March 29, 2000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.9
 
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated March 31, 2000, among ACE INA Holdings, Inc., Bank One Trust Company, National Association, as property trustee, Bank One Delaware Inc., as Delaware trustee and the administrative trustees named therein
 
10-K
 
4.17
 
March 16, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.10
 
Common Securities Guarantee Agreement, dated March 31, 2000
 
10-K
 
4.18
 
March 16, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.11
 
Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement, dated March 31, 2000
 
10-K
 
4.19
 
March 16, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.1
 
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Rain and Hail Insurance Service, Inc., Steve C. Harms, as shareholders' representative, ACE American Insurance Company, Raha Iowa Acquisition Corp. and ACE Limited
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
November 8, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.2*
 
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and individuals who became directors of the Company after the Company's redomestication to Switzerland
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
August 6, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.3*
 
Second Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement in the form executed between the Company and directors (except for Olivier Steimer) and/or officers
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
August 7, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.4*
 
Indemnification agreement between the Company and Olivier Steimer, dated November 20, 2008
 
10-K
 
10.2
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.5
 
First Amendment dated as of November 21, 2012, to the Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

110



 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
10.6
 
Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
 
10-K
 
10.5
 
February 25, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.7
 
First Amendment dated as of November 21, 2012, to the Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and ING Bank N.V., London Branch
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.8
 
Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and ING Bank N.V., London Branch
 
10-K
 
10.6
 
February 25, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.9
 
First Amendment dated as of November 21, 2012, to the Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsibushi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.10
 
Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsibushi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch
 
10-K
 
10.7
 
February 25, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.11
 
First Amendment dated as of November 21, 2012, to the Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.12
 
Letter of credit facility agreements dated November 18, 2010, between ACE Limited and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC
 
10-K
 
10.8
 
February 25, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.13
 
Credit Agreement for $1,000,000,000 Senior Unsecured Letter of Credit Facility, dated as of November 6, 2012, among ACE Limited, and certain subsidiaries and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Administrative Agent, the Swingline Bank and an Issuing Bank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.14*
 
Employment Terms dated October 29, 2001, between ACE Limited and Evan Greenberg
 
10-K
 
10.64
 
March 27, 2003
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.15*
 
Employment Terms dated November 2, 2001, between ACE Limited and Philip V. Bancroft
 
10-K
 
10.65
 
March 27, 2003
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.16*
 
Executive Severance Agreement between ACE Limited and Philip Bancroft, effective January 2, 2002
 
10-Q
 
10. 1
 
May 10, 2004
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.17*
 
Letter Regarding Executive Severance between ACE Limited and Philip V. Bancroft
 
10-K
 
10.17
 
February 25, 2011
 
 

111



 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
10.18*
 
Employment Terms dated February 25, 2005, between ACE Limited and Robert Cusumano
 
10-K
 
10.21
 
March 1, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.19*
 
Employment Terms dated April 10, 2006, between ACE and John Keogh
 
10-K
 
10.29
 
February 29, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.20*
 
Executive Severance Agreement between ACE and John Keogh
 
10-K
 
10.30
 
February 29, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.21*
 
ACE Limited Executive Severance Plan as amended effective May 18, 2011
 
10-K
 
10.21
 
February 24, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.22*
 
Form of employment agreement between the Company (or subsidiaries of the Company) and executive officers of the Company to allocate a percentage of aggregate salary to the Company (or subsidiaries of the Company)
 
8-K
 
10.1
 
July 16, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.23*
 
Description of Executive Officer Cash Compensation for 2011
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
November 3, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.24*
 
Description of Directors Compensation
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
November 3, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.25*
 
ACE Limited Annual Performance Incentive Plan
  
S-1
 
10.13
 
January 21, 1993
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.26*
 
ACE Limited Elective Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005)
 
10-K
 
10.24
 
March 16, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.27*
 
ACE USA Officer Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended through January 1, 2001)
 
10-K
 
10.25
 
March 16, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.28*
 
ACE USA Officer Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009)
 
10-K
 
10.36
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.29*
 
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated ACE USA Officers Deferred Compensation Plan
 
10-K
 
10.28
 
February 25, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.30*
 
Form of Swiss Mandatory Retirement Benefit Agreement (for Swiss-employed named executive officers)
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
May 7, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.31*
 
ACE Limited Supplemental Retirement Plan (as amended and restated effective July 1, 2001)
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
November 14, 2001
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.32*
 
Amendments to the ACE Limited Supplemental Retirement Plan and the ACE Limited Elective Deferred Compensation Plan
 
10-K
 
10.38
 
February 29, 2008
 
 

112



 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
10.33*
 
ACE Limited Elective Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009)
 
10-K
 
10.39
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.34*
 
Deferred Compensation Plan amendments, effective January 1, 2009
 
10-K
 
10.40
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.35*
 
Amendment to the ACE Limited Supplemental Retirement Plan
 
10-K
 
10.39
 
February 29, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.36*
 
Amendment and restated ACE Limited Supplemental Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2009
 
10-K
 
10.42
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.37*
 
ACE USA Supplemental Employee Retirement Savings Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.6
 
May 15, 2000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.38*
 
ACE USA Supplemental Employee Retirement Savings Plan (as amended through the Second Amendment)
 
10-K
 
10.30
 
March 1, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.39*
 
ACE USA Supplemental Employee Retirement Savings Plan (as amended through the Third Amendment)
 
10-K
 
10.31
 
March 1, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.40*
 
ACE USA Supplemental Employee Retirement Savings Plan (as amended and restated)
 
10-K
 
10.46
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.41*
 
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated ACE USA Supplemental Employee Retirement Savings Plan
 
10-K
 
10.39
 
February 25, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.42*
 
The ACE Limited 1995 Outside Directors Plan (as amended through the Seventh Amendment)
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
August 14, 2003
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.43*
 
Board of Directors Resolution Amending Option Awards for Gary Stuart
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
May 8, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.44*
 
ACE Limited 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended through the Third Amendment)
 
10-K
 
10.33
 
March 1, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.45*
 
ACE Limited 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended through the Fourth Amendment)
 
10-K
 
10.34
 
March 1, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.46*
 
ACE Limited 1999 Replacement Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
November 15, 1999
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.47*
 
ACE Limited Rules of the Approved U.K. Stock Option Program
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
February 13, 1998
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

113



 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
10.48*
 
ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended through the Fifth Amendment)
 
8-K
 
10
 
May 21, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.49*
 
Revised Form of Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.3
 
November 8, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.50*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-K
 
10.54
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.51*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-K
 
10.55
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.52*
 
Director Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
November 9, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.53*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
8-K
 
10.3
 
September 13, 2004
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.54*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.4
 
November 8, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.55*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
May 8, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.56*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
May 8, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.57*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-K
 
10.60
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.58*
 
Form of Incentive Stock Option Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
8-K
 
10.4
 
September 13, 2004
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.59*
 
Form of Incentive Stock Option Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.4
 
May 8, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.60*
 
Form of Incentive Stock Option Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-K
 
10.63
 
February 27, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

114



 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
10.61*
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
8-K
 
10.5
 
September 13, 2004
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.62*
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.3
 
May 8, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.63*
 
Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as updated through May 4, 2006
 
10-Q
 
10.3
 
May 5, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.64*
 
Revised Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
November 8, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.65*
 
Revised Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Terms under The ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-K
 
10.65
 
February 25, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.66*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms (for outside directors) under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
November 7, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.67*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms (for outside directors) under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
August 7, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.68*
 
Form of Incentive Stock Option Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Messrs. Greenberg and Cusumano
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
August 4, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.69*
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Messrs. Greenberg and Cusumano
 
10-Q
 
10.2
 
August 4, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.70*
 
Form of Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Messrs. Greenberg and Cusumano
 
10-Q
 
10.3
 
August 4, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.71*
 
ACE Limited Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended
 
8-K
 
10.1
 
May 22, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.72*
 
Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Terms under the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Messrs. Greenberg and Cusumano
 
10-K
 
10.72
 
February 24, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

115



 
 
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Original Number
 
Date Filed
 
Filed Herewith
10.73
 
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for $500,000,000 dated as of November 8, 2007, among ACE Limited, certain subsidiaries, various lenders and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Barclays Capital as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners
 
8-K
 
10.2
 
November 14, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.74
 
First Amendment and Waiver dated July 10, 2008, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for $500,000,000 dated as of November 8, 2007, among ACE Limited, certain subsidiaries, various lenders and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Barclays Capital as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners
 
8-K
 
10.6
 
July 16, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.75
 
Letter of Credit Agreement for $500,000,000, dated June 16, 2009, among ACE Limited, and Deutsche Bank, New York Branch
 
10-Q
 
10.1
 
August 7, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.1
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred share dividends calculation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21.1
 
Subsidiaries of the Company
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23.1
 
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31.1
 
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32.1
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32.2
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101
 
The following financial information from ACE Limited's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL: (i)  Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
* Management Contract or Compensation Plan

116



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ACE LIMITED

By:
/s/ Philip V. Bancroft
 
Philip V. Bancroft
Chief Financial Officer

February 28, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
 
Title
Date
 
 
 
 
/s/ Evan G. Greenberg
 
President, Chairman, Chief Executive
February 28, 2013
Evan G. Greenberg
 
Officer; Director
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Philip V. Bancroft
 
Chief Financial Officer
February 28, 2013
Philip V. Bancroft
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Paul B. Medini
 
Chief Accounting Officer
February 28, 2013
Paul B. Medini
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)

 
 
 
 
/s/ Michael G. Atieh
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Michael G. Atieh
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Mary A. Cirillo
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Mary A. Cirillo
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Michael P. Connors
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Michael P. Connors
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Robert M. Hernandez
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Robert M. Hernandez
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Peter Menikoff
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Peter Menikoff
 
 




117


Signature
 
Title
Date
 
 
 
 
/s/ Leo F. Mullin
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Leo F. Mullin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Thomas J. Neff
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Thomas J. Neff
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Robert Ripp
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Robert Ripp
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Eugene B. Shanks, Jr.
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Eugene B. Shanks, Jr.
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Theodore Shasta
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Theodore Shasta
 
 

 
 
 
 
/s/ Olivier Steimer
 
Director
February 28, 2013
Olivier Steimer
 
 


118


ACE LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012





F-1


ACE Limited
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


 
 
Page
 
 
Consolidated Financial Statements

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note 1.
Note 2.
Note 3.
Note 4.
Note 5.
Note 6.
Note 7.
Note 8.
Note 9.
Note 10.
Note 11.
Note 12.
Note 13.
Note 14.
Note 15.
Note 16.
Note 17.
Note 18.
Note 19.
Note 20.
 
 
Financial Statement Schedules
 
Schedule I
 
 
Schedule II
 
 
Schedule IV
 
 
Schedule VI



F-2


M ANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of ACE Limited (ACE) were prepared by management, who are responsible for their reliability and objectivity. The statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, as such, include amounts based on informed estimates and judgments of management. Financial information elsewhere in this annual report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements.

The Board of Directors, operating through its Audit Committee, which is composed entirely of directors who are not officers or employees of ACE, provides oversight of the financial reporting process and safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition. The Audit Committee annually recommends the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm and submits its recommendation to the Board of Directors for approval.

The Audit Committee meets with management, the independent registered public accountants and the internal auditor; approves the overall scope of audit work and related fee arrangements; and reviews audit reports and findings. In addition, the independent registered public accountants and the internal auditor meet separately with the Audit Committee, without management representatives present, to discuss the results of their audits; the adequacy of ACE's internal control; the quality of its financial reporting; and the safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

The consolidated financial statements have been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, who were given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data, including minutes of all meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board. ACE believes that all representations made to our independent registered public accountants during their audits were valid and appropriate.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of ACE is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As of December 31, 2012 , management has evaluated the effectiveness of ACE's internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, we have concluded that ACE's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012 .

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of ACE included in this Annual Report, has issued a report on the effectiveness of ACE's internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 . The report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of ACE's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 , is included in this Item under “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and follows this statement.


/s/ Evan G. Greenberg
 
/s/ Philip V. Bancroft
Evan G. Greenberg
 
Philip V. Bancroft
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Chief Financial Officer

                                            



F-3


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of ACE Limited:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ACE Limited and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15 (2) present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, appearing in Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements and Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedules, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 28, 2013



F-4


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
December 31

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
2012

 
2011

Assets
 
 
 
Investments
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost – $44,666 and $40,450) (includes hybrid financial instruments of $309 and $357)
$
47,306

 
$
41,967

 
Fixed maturities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value – $7,633 and $8,605)
7,270

 
8,447

 
Equity securities, at fair value (cost – $707 and $671)
744

 
647

 
Short-term investments, at fair value and amortized cost
2,228

 
2,301

 
Other investments (cost – $2,465 and $2,112)
2,716

 
2,314

 
 
Total investments
60,264

 
55,676

Cash
615

 
614

Securities lending collateral
1,791

 
1,375

Accrued investment income
552

 
547

Insurance and reinsurance balances receivable
4,147

 
4,387

Reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses
12,078

 
12,389

Reinsurance recoverable on policy benefits
241

 
249

Deferred policy acquisition costs
1,873

 
1,548

Value of business acquired
614

 
676

Goodwill and other intangible assets
4,975

 
4,799

Prepaid reinsurance premiums
1,617

 
1,541

Deferred tax assets
453

 
673

Investments in partially-owned insurance companies (cost – $451 and $345)
454

 
352

Other assets
2,871

 
2,495

Total assets
$
92,545

 
$
87,321

Liabilities
 
 
 
Unpaid losses and loss expenses
$
37,946

 
$
37,477

Unearned premiums
6,864

 
6,334

Future policy benefits
4,470

 
4,274

Insurance and reinsurance balances payable
3,472

 
3,542

Securities lending payable
1,795

 
1,385

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
5,377

 
4,898

Income taxes payable
20

 
159

Short-term debt
1,401

 
1,251

Long-term debt
3,360

 
3,360

Trust preferred securities
309

 
309

Total liabilities
65,014

 
62,989

Commitments and contingencies
 
 
 
Shareholders’ equity
 
 
 
Common Shares (CHF 28.89 and CHF 30.27 par value; 342,832,412 shares issued; 340,321,534 and 336,927,276 shares outstanding)
9,591

 
10,095

Common Shares in treasury (2,510,878 and 5,905,136 shares)
(159
)
 
(327
)
Additional paid-in capital
5,179

 
5,326

Retained earnings
10,033

 
7,327

Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI)
2,887

 
1,911

Total shareholders’ equity
27,531

 
24,332

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
92,545

 
$
87,321

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements



F-5


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Net premiums written
$
16,075

 
$
15,372

 
$
13,708

Change in unearned premiums
(398
)
 
15

 
(204
)
Net premiums earned
15,677

 
15,387

 
13,504

Net investment income
2,181

 
2,242

 
2,070

Net realized gains (losses):


 
 
 
 
Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses gross
(38
)
 
(65
)
 
(128
)
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI)
1

 
15

 
69

Net OTTI losses recognized in income
(37
)
 
(50
)
 
(59
)
Net realized gains (losses) excluding OTTI losses
115

 
(745
)
 
491

Total net realized gains (losses)
78

 
(795
)
 
432

Total revenues
17,936

 
16,834

 
16,006

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Losses and loss expenses
9,653

 
9,520

 
7,579

Policy benefits
521

 
401

 
357

Policy acquisition costs
2,446

 
2,472

 
2,345

Administrative expenses
2,096

 
2,068

 
1,873

Interest expense
250

 
250

 
224

Other (income) expense
(6
)
 
81

 
(10
)
Total expenses
14,960

 
14,792

 
12,368

Income before income tax
2,976

 
2,042

 
3,638

Income tax expense
270

 
502

 
553

Net income
$
2,706

 
$
1,540

 
$
3,085

Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized appreciation
$
1,350

 
$
646

 
$
1,526

Reclassification adjustment for Net realized (gains) losses included in net income
(234
)
 
(173
)
 
(632
)
 
1,116

 
473

 
894

Change in:
 
 
 
 
 
Cumulative translation adjustment
116

 
(5
)
 
(7
)
Pension liability
(35
)
 
8

 
11

Other comprehensive income, before income tax
1,197

 
476

 
898

Income tax expense related to OCI items
(221
)
 
(159
)
 
(127
)
Other comprehensive income
976

 
317

 
771

Comprehensive income
$
3,682

 
$
1,857

 
$
3,856

Earnings per share
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share
$
7.96

 
$
4.55

 
$
9.08

Diluted earnings per share
$
7.89

 
$
4.52

 
$
9.04

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


F-6


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Common Shares
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year
$
10,095

 
$
10,161

 
$
10,503

Net shares issued under employee share-based compensation plans

 

 
71

Exercise of stock options

 
47

 
30

Dividends declared on Common Shares-par value reduction
(504
)
 
(113
)
 
(443
)
Balance – end of year
9,591

 
10,095

 
10,161

Common Shares in treasury
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year
(327
)
 
(330
)
 
(3
)
Common Shares repurchased
(7
)
 
(132
)
 
(303
)
Common Shares issued in treasury, net of net shares redeemed under employee share-based compensation plans
175

 
135

 
(24
)
Balance – end of year
(159
)
 
(327
)
 
(330
)
Additional paid-in capital
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year
5,326

 
5,623

 
5,526

Net shares redeemed under employee share-based compensation plans
(93
)
 
(104
)
 
(64
)
Exercise of stock options
(7
)
 
16

 
23

Share-based compensation expense and other
135

 
139

 
139

Funding of dividends declared to Retained earnings
(200
)
 
(354
)
 

Tax (expense) benefit on share-based compensation expense
18

 
6

 
(1
)
Balance – end of year
5,179

 
5,326

 
5,623

Retained earnings
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year, as reported


 


 
2,818

Cumulative effect of adjustment resulting from adoption of new accounting guidance


 


 
(116
)
Balance – beginning of year, as adjusted
7,327

 
5,787

 
2,702

Net income
2,706

 
1,540

 
3,085

Funding of dividends declared from Additional paid-in capital
200

 
354

 

Dividends declared on Common Shares
(200
)
 
(354
)
 

Balance – end of year
10,033

 
7,327

 
5,787

Deferred compensation obligation
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year

 
2

 
2

Decrease to obligation

 
(2
)
 

Balance – end of year
$

 
$

 
$
2

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


F-7


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Accumulated other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized appreciation on investments
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year
$
1,715

 
$
1,399

 
$
657

Change in year, net of income tax expense of $(198), $(157), and $(152)
918

 
316

 
742

Balance – end of year
2,633

 
1,715

 
1,399

Cumulative translation adjustment
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year
258

 
262

 
240

Change in year, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(35), $1, and $29
81

 
(4
)
 
22

Balance – end of year
339

 
258

 
262

Pension liability adjustment
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year
(62
)
 
(67
)
 
(74
)
Change in year, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $12, $(3) and $(4)
(23
)
 
5

 
7

Balance – end of year
(85
)
 
(62
)
 
(67
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
2,887

 
1,911

 
1,594

Common Shares issued to employee trust
 
 
 
 
 
Balance – beginning of year

 
(2
)
 
(2
)
Decrease in Common Shares

 
2

 

Balance – end of year

 

 
(2
)
Total shareholders’ equity
$
27,531

 
$
24,332

 
$
22,835

 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


 
For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
2,706

 
$
1,540

 
$
3,085

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities

 

 

Net realized (gains) losses
(78
)
 
795

 
(432
)
Amortization of premiums/discounts on fixed maturities
220

 
152

 
145

Deferred income taxes
(7
)
 
15

 
110

Unpaid losses and loss expenses
203

 
43

 
(360
)
Unearned premiums
522

 
9

 
262

Future policy benefits
158

 
78

 
48

Insurance and reinsurance balances payable
(151
)
 
216

 
(172
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
(42
)
 
39

 
130

Income taxes payable
(167
)
 
39

 
10

Insurance and reinsurance balances receivable
335

 
(217
)
 
50

Reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses
372

 
531

 
626

Reinsurance recoverable on policy benefits
52

 
25

 
49

Deferred policy acquisition costs
(340
)
 
(122
)
 
(170
)
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
(123
)
 
(34
)
 
(13
)
Other
335

 
361

 
178

Net cash flows from operating activities
3,995

 
3,470

 
3,546

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
 

Purchases of fixed maturities available for sale
(23,455
)
 
(23,823
)
 
(29,985
)
Purchases of to be announced mortgage-backed securities
(389
)
 
(755
)
 
(1,271
)
Purchases of fixed maturities held to maturity
(388
)
 
(340
)
 
(616
)
Purchases of equity securities
(135
)
 
(309
)
 
(794
)
Sales of fixed maturities available for sale
14,321

 
17,176

 
23,096

Sales of to be announced mortgage-backed securities
448

 
795

 
1,183

Sales of equity securities
119

 
376

 
774

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities available for sale
5,523

 
3,720

 
3,660

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities held to maturity
1,451

 
1,279

 
1,353

Net derivative instruments settlements
(281
)
 
(67
)
 
(109
)
Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired of $8, $91, and $80)
(98
)
 
(606
)
 
(1,139
)
Other
(555
)
 
(482
)
 
(333
)
Net cash flows used for investing activities
(3,439
)
 
(3,036
)
 
(4,181
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends paid on Common Shares
(815
)
 
(459
)
 
(435
)
Common Shares repurchased
(11
)
 
(195
)
 
(235
)
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt
2,933

 
5,238

 
1,300

Repayment of short-term debt
(2,783
)
 
(5,288
)
 
(159
)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 

 
699

Repayment of long-term debt

 

 
(500
)
Proceeds from share-based compensation plans, including windfall tax benefits
126

 
139

 
62

Net cash flows (used for) from financing activities
(550
)
 
(565
)
 
732

Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(5
)
 
(27
)
 
6

Net increase (decrease) in cash
1

 
(158
)
 
103

Cash – beginning of year
614

 
772

 
669

Cash – end of year
$
615

 
$
614

 
$
772

Supplemental cash flow information
 
 
 
 
 
Taxes paid
$
438

 
$
460

 
$
434

Interest paid
$
240

 
$
234

 
$
204

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


F-8


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



1 . Summary of significant accounting policies

a) Basis of presentation
ACE Limited is a holding company incorporated in Zurich, Switzerland. ACE Limited, through its various subsidiaries, provides a broad range of insurance and reinsurance products to insureds worldwide. ACE operates through the following business segments: Insurance – North American, Insurance – Overseas General, Global Reinsurance, and Life. Refer to Note 15 for additional information.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements, which include the accounts of ACE Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively, ACE, we, us, or our), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normally recurring accruals) necessary for a fair statement of the results and financial position for such periods. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Effective January 1, 2012 , we retrospectively adopted new accounting guidance for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. Prior year amounts contained in this report have been adjusted to reflect this adoption. Refer to Note 1 s) below for additional information.
  
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Amounts included in the consolidated financial statements reflect our best estimates and assumptions; actual amounts could differ materially from these estimates. ACE's principal estimates include:
unpaid loss and loss expense reserves, including long-tail asbestos and environmental (A&E) reserves;
future policy benefits reserves;
the valuation of value of business acquired (VOBA) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and VOBA;
reinsurance recoverable, including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance;
the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts;
the valuation of the investment portfolio and assessment of OTTI;
the valuation of deferred tax assets;
the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed living benefits (GLB); and
the valuation of goodwill.

b) Premiums
Premiums are generally recognized as written upon inception of the policy. For multi-year policies for which premiums written are payable in annual installments, only the current annual premium is included as written at policy inception due to the ability of the insured/reinsured to commute or cancel coverage within the term of the policy. The remaining annual premiums are included as written at each successive anniversary date within the multi-year term.

For property and casualty (P&C) insurance and reinsurance products, premiums written are primarily earned on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies to which they relate. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written applicable to the unexpired portion of the policies in force. For retrospectively-rated policies, written premiums are adjusted to reflect expected ultimate premiums consistent with changes to reported losses, or other measures of exposure as stated in the policy, and earned over the coverage period of the policy. For retrospectively-rated multi-year policies, the amount of premiums recognized in the current period is computed, using a with-and-without method, as the difference between the ceding enterprise's total contract costs before and after the experience under the contract at the reporting date. Accordingly, for retrospectively-rated multi-year policies, additional premiums are generally written and earned when losses are incurred.

Mandatory reinstatement premiums assessed on reinsurance policies are earned in the period of the loss event that gave rise to the reinstatement premiums.  All remaining unearned premiums are recognized over the remaining coverage period. 




F-9


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Premiums from long duration contracts such as certain traditional term life, whole life, endowment, and long duration personal accident and health (A&H) policies are generally recognized as revenue when due from policyholders. Traditional life policies include those contracts with fixed and guaranteed premiums and benefits. Benefits and expenses are matched with such income to result in the recognition of profit over the life of the contracts.

Retroactive loss portfolio transfer (LPT) contracts in which the insured loss events occurred prior to the inception of the contract are evaluated to determine whether they meet the established criteria for reinsurance accounting. If reinsurance accounting is appropriate, written premiums are fully earned and corresponding losses and loss expenses recognized at the inception of the contract. The contracts can cause significant variances in gross premiums written, net premiums written, net premiums earned, and net incurred losses in the years in which they are written. Reinsurance contracts sold not meeting the established criteria for reinsurance accounting are recorded using the deposit method as described below in Note 1 k ).

Reinsurance premiums assumed are based on information provided by ceding companies supplemented by our own estimates of premium when we have not received ceding company reports. The information used in establishing these estimates is reviewed and adjustments are recorded in the period in which they are determined. These premiums are earned over the coverage terms of the related reinsurance contracts and range from one to three years.

c) Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired
Policy acquisition costs consist of commissions, premium taxes, and certain underwriting costs related directly to the successful acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts. A VOBA intangible asset is established upon the acquisition of blocks of long duration contracts and represents the present value of estimated net cash flows for the contracts in force at the time of the acquisition. Acquisition costs and VOBA, collectively policy acquisition costs, are deferred and amortized. This amortization is recorded in Policy acquisition costs in the consolidated statements of operations. Policy acquisition costs on P&C contracts are generally amortized ratably over the period in which premiums are earned. Policy acquisition costs on traditional long-duration contracts are amortized over the estimated life of the contracts, generally in proportion to premium revenue recognized. For non-traditional long- duration contracts, we amortize policy acquisition costs over the expected life of the contracts in proportion to estimates of expected gross profits.  The effect of changes in estimates of expected gross profits is reflected in the period that the estimates are revised. Policy acquisition costs are reviewed to determine if they are recoverable from future income, including investment income. Unrecoverable costs are expensed in the period identified.

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred except for direct-response campaigns that qualify for cost deferral, principally related to A&H business produced by the Insurance – Overseas General segment, which are deferred and recognized as a component of policy acquisition costs . For individual direct-response marketing campaigns that we can demonstrate have specifically resulted in incremental sales to customers and such sales have probable future economic benefits, incremental costs directly related to the marketing campaigns are capitalized. Deferred marketing costs are reviewed regularly for recoverability from future income, including investment income, and amortized in proportion to premium revenue recognized, primarily over a ten -year period, the expected economic future benefit period. The expected future benefit period is evaluated periodically based on historical results and adjusted prospectively. The amount of deferred marketing costs reported in Deferred policy acquisition costs in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 274 million and $ 236 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The amortization expense for deferred marketing costs was $ 156 million, $ 128 million, and $ 115 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively.

d) Reinsurance
ACE assumes and cedes reinsurance with other insurance companies to provide greater diversification of business and minimize the net loss potential arising from large risks. Ceded reinsurance contracts do not relieve ACE of its primary obligation to its policyholders.

For both ceded and assumed reinsurance, risk transfer requirements must be met in order to account for a contract as reinsurance, principally resulting in the recognition of cash flows under the contract as premiums and losses. To meet risk transfer requirements, a reinsurance contract must include insurance risk, consisting of both underwriting and timing risk, and a reasonable possibility of a significant loss for the assuming entity. To assess risk transfer for certain contracts, ACE generally develops expected discounted cash flow analyses at contract inception. Deposit accounting is used for contracts that do not meet risk transfer requirements. Deposit accounting requires that consideration received or paid be recorded in the balance sheet as opposed to recording premiums written or losses incurred in the statement of operations. Non-refundable fees on deposit contracts are earned based on the terms of the contract. Refer to Note 1 k ).



F-10


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Reinsurance recoverable includes the balances due from reinsurance companies for paid and unpaid losses and loss expenses and policy benefits that will be recovered from reinsurers, based on contracts in force. The method for determining the reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses incurred but not reported (IBNR) involves actuarial estimates consistent with those used to establish the associated liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses as well as a determination of ACE's ability to cede unpaid losses and loss expenses.

Reinsurance recoverable is presented net of a provision for uncollectible reinsurance determined based upon a review of the financial condition of reinsurers and other factors. The provision for uncollectible reinsurance is based on an estimate of the amount of the reinsurance recoverable balance that will ultimately be unrecoverable due to reinsurer insolvency, a contractual dispute, or any other reason. The valuation of this provision includes several judgments including certain aspects of the allocation of reinsurance recoverable on IBNR claims by reinsurer and a default analysis to estimate uncollectible reinsurance. The primary components of the default analysis are reinsurance recoverable balances by reinsurer, net of collateral, and default factors used to determine the portion of a reinsurer's balance deemed uncollectible. The definition of collateral for this purpose requires some judgment and is generally limited to assets held in an ACE-only beneficiary trust, letters of credit, and liabilities held with the same legal entity for which ACE believes there is a contractual right of offset. The determination of the default factor is principally based on the financial strength rating of the reinsurer. Default factors require considerable judgment and are determined using the current financial strength rating, or rating equivalent, of each reinsurer as well as other key considerations and assumptions. The more significant considerations include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:
For reinsurers that maintain a financial strength rating from a major rating agency, and for which recoverable balances are considered representative of the larger population (i.e., default probabilities are consistent with similarly rated reinsurers and payment durations conform to averages), the financial rating is based on a published source and the default factor is based on published default statistics of a major rating agency applicable to the reinsurer's particular rating class. When a recoverable is expected to be paid in a brief period of time by a highly rated reinsurer, such as certain property catastrophe claims, a default factor may not be applied;
For balances recoverable from reinsurers that are both unrated by a major rating agency and for which management is unable to determine a credible rating equivalent based on a parent, affiliate, or peer company, we determine a rating equivalent based on an analysis of the reinsurer that considers an assessment of the creditworthiness of the particular entity, industry benchmarks, or other factors as considered appropriate. We then apply the applicable default factor for that rating class. For balances recoverable from unrated reinsurers for which the ceded reserve is below a certain threshold, we generally apply a default factor of 34 percent, consistent with published statistics of a major rating agency;
For balances recoverable from reinsurers that are either insolvent or under regulatory supervision, we establish a default factor and resulting provision for uncollectible reinsurance based on reinsurer-specific facts and circumstances. Upon initial notification of an insolvency, we generally recognize an expense for a substantial portion of all balances outstanding, net of collateral, through a combination of write-offs of recoverable balances and increases to the provision for uncollectible reinsurance. When regulatory action is taken on a reinsurer, we generally recognize a default factor by estimating an expected recovery on all balances outstanding, net of collateral. When sufficient credible information becomes available, we adjust the provision for uncollectible reinsurance by establishing a default factor pursuant to information received; and
For other recoverables, management determines the provision for uncollectible reinsurance based on the specific facts and circumstances.

The methods used to determine the reinsurance recoverable balance and related provision for uncollectible reinsurance are regularly reviewed and updated and any resulting adjustments are reflected in earnings in the period identified.

Prepaid reinsurance premiums represent the portion of premiums ceded to reinsurers applicable to the unexpired coverage terms of the reinsurance contracts in force.

The value of reinsurance business assumed of $ 32 million and $ 35 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively, included in Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, represents the excess of estimated ultimate value of the liabilities assumed under retroactive reinsurance contracts over consideration received. The value of reinsurance business assumed is amortized and recorded to losses and loss expenses based on the payment pattern of the losses assumed and ranges between 7 and 40 years. The unamortized value is reviewed regularly to determine if it is recoverable based upon the terms of the contract, estimated losses and loss expenses, and anticipated investment income. Unrecoverable amounts are expensed in the period identified.




F-11


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


e) Investments
Fixed maturities are classified as either available for sale or held to maturity. The available for sale portfolio is reported at fair value. The held to maturity portfolio includes securities for which we have the ability and intent to hold to maturity or redemption and is reported at amortized cost. Equity securities are classified as available for sale and are recorded at fair value. Short-term investments comprise securities due to mature within one year of the date of purchase and are recorded at fair value which typically approximates cost. Short-term investments include certain cash and cash equivalents, which are part of investment portfolios under the management of external investment managers.

Other investments principally comprise life insurance policies, policy loans, trading securities, other direct equity investments, investment funds, and limited partnerships.

Life insurance policies are carried at policy cash surrender value.
Policy loans are carried at outstanding balance.
Trading securities are recorded on a trade date basis and carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are reflected in net income.
Other investments over which ACE can exercise significant influence are accounted for using the equity method.
All other investments over which ACE cannot exercise significant influence are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through OCI. For these investments, investment income and realized gains are recognized as related distributions are received.
Partially-owned investment companies comprise entities in which we hold an ownership interest in excess of three percent. These investments as well as ACE's investments in investment funds where our ownership interest is in excess of three percent are accounted for under the equity method because ACE exerts significant influence. These investments apply investment company accounting to determine operating results, and ACE retains the investment company accounting in applying the equity method. This means that investment income, realized gains or losses, and unrealized gains or losses are included in the portion of equity earnings reflected in Other (income) expense.

Investments in partially-owned insurance companies primarily represent direct investments in which ACE has significant influence and, as such, meet the requirements for equity accounting. We report our share of the net income or loss of the partially-owned insurance companies in Other (income) expense. Investments in partially-owned insurance companies over which ACE does not exert significant influence are carried at fair value.

Realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is included as a separate component of AOCI in shareholders' equity. We regularly review our investments for OTTI. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.

With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the security's value is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security and realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are the result of changing or unforeseen facts and circumstances (i.e., arising from a large insured loss such as a catastrophe), deterioration of the creditworthiness of the issuer or its industry, or changes in regulatory requirements. We believe that subsequent decisions to sell such securities are consistent with the classification of the majority of the portfolio as available for sale.

We use derivative instruments including futures, options, swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts for the purpose of managing certain investment portfolio risks and exposures. Refer to Note 10 for additional information. Derivatives are reported at fair value and recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities with changes in fair value included in Net realized gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations. Collateral held by brokers equal to a percentage of the total value of open futures contracts is included in the investment portfolio.

Net investment income includes interest and dividend income and amortization of fixed maturity market premiums and discounts and is net of investment management and custody fees. For mortgage-backed securities, and any other holdings for which there is a prepayment risk, prepayment assumptions are evaluated and revised as necessary. Any adjustments required due to the resultant change in effective yields and maturities are recognized prospectively. Prepayment fees or call premiums


F-12


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


that are only payable when a security is called prior to its maturity are earned when received and reflected in Net investment income. 

ACE participates in a securities lending program operated by a third party banking institution whereby certain assets are loaned to qualified borrowers and from which we earn an incremental return. Borrowers provide collateral, in the form of either cash or approved securities, of 102 percent of the fair value of the loaned securities.  Each security loan is deemed to be an overnight transaction.  Cash collateral is invested in a collateral pool which is managed by the banking institution.  The collateral pool is subject to written investment guidelines with key objectives which include the safeguard of principal and adequate liquidity to meet anticipated redemptions. The fair value of the loaned securities is monitored on a daily basis, with additional collateral obtained or refunded as the fair value of the loaned securities changes. The collateral is held by the third party banking institution, and the collateral can only be accessed in the event that the institution borrowing the securities is in default under the lending agreement. As a result of these restrictions, we consider our securities lending activities to be non-cash investing and financing activities. An indemnification agreement with the lending agent protects us in the event a borrower becomes insolvent or fails to return any of the securities on loan. The fair value of the securities on loan is included in fixed maturities and equity securities. The securities lending collateral is reported as a separate line in total assets with a related liability reflecting our obligation to return the collateral plus interest.

Similar to securities lending arrangements, securities sold under reverse repurchase agreements, whereby ACE sells securities and repurchases them at a future date for a predetermined price, are accounted for as collateralized investments and borrowings and are recorded at the contractual repurchase amounts plus accrued interest. Assets to be repurchased are the same, or substantially the same, as the assets transferred and the transferor, through right of substitution, maintains the right and ability to redeem the collateral on short notice. The fair value of the underlying securities is included in fixed maturities and equity securities. In contrast to securities lending programs, the use of cash received is not restricted. We report the obligation to return the cash as Short-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets.

Refer to Note 4 for a discussion on the determination of fair value for ACE's various investment securities.

f) Cash
Cash includes cash on hand and deposits with an original maturity of three months or less at time of purchase. Cash held by external money managers is included in Short-term investments.

We have agreements with a third party bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs. In each program, participating ACE entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider and each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency (U.S. dollars) and then notionally pooled. The bank extends overdraft credit to any participating ACE entity as needed, provided that the overall notionally-pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero. Actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not commingled between legal entities. Any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ACE entity would be guaranteed by ACE Limited (up to $ 300 million in the aggregate). Our syndicated letter of credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ACE entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool.

g) Goodwill and other intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquisitions over the fair value of net assets acquired and is not amortized. Goodwill is assigned at acquisition to the applicable reporting unit of the acquired entities giving rise to the goodwill. Goodwill impairment tests are performed annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment.  For goodwill impairment testing, we use a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (i.e., more than a 50 percent probability) that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. If our assessment indicates less than a 50 percent probability that fair value exceeds carrying value, we quantitatively estimate a reporting unit's fair value using a consistently applied combination of the following models: an earnings multiple, a book value multiple, a discounted cash flow, or an allocated market capitalization model. The earnings and book value models apply multiples of comparable publicly traded companies to forecasted earnings or book value of each reporting unit and consider current market transactions. The discounted cash flow model applies a discount to estimated cash flows including a terminal value calculation. The market capitalization model allocates market capitalization to each reporting unit. Where appropriate, we consider the impact of a control premium. Goodwill recorded in connection with investments in partially-owned insurance companies is recorded in Investments in partially-owned insurance companies and is also measured for impairment annually.




F-13


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Indefinite lived intangible assets are not subject to amortization. Finite lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives, generally ranging from 4 to 20 years. The amortization of finite lived intangible assets is reported in Other (income) expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The carrying amounts of intangible assets are regularly reviewed for indicators of impairment. Impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value.

h) Unpaid losses and loss expenses
A liability is established for the estimated unpaid losses and loss expenses under the terms of, and with respect to, ACE's policies and agreements. These amounts include provision for both reported claims (case reserves) and IBNR claims. The methods of determining such estimates and establishing the resulting liability are reviewed regularly and any adjustments are reflected in operations in the period in which they become known. Future developments may result in losses and loss expenses materially greater or less than recorded amounts.

Except for net loss and loss expense reserves of $ 58 million net of discount, held at December 31, 2012, representing certain structured settlements for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determinable and $ 47 million net of discount of certain reserves for unsettled claims that are discounted in statutory filings, ACE does not discount its P&C loss reserves. This compares with reserves of $ 59 million for certain structured settlements and $ 35 million of certain reserves for unsettled claims at December 31, 2011. Structured settlements represent contracts purchased from life insurance companies primarily to settle workers' compensation claims, where payments to the claimant by the life insurance company are expected to be made in the form of an annuity. ACE retains the liability to the claimant in the event that the life insurance company fails to pay. At December 31, 2012 , the gross liability for the amount due to claimants was $ 640 million net of discount and reinsurance recoverables for amounts due from the life insurance companies was $ 582 million net of discount. For structured settlement contracts where payments are guaranteed regardless of claimant life expectancy, the amounts recoverable from the life insurance companies at December 31, 2012 are included in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, as they do not meet the requirements for reinsurance accounting.

Included in unpaid losses and loss expenses are liabilities for asbestos and environmental (A&E) claims and expenses. These unpaid losses and loss expenses are principally related to claims arising from remediation costs associated with hazardous waste sites and bodily-injury claims related to asbestos products and environmental hazards. The estimation of these liabilities is particularly sensitive to changes in the legal environment, including specific settlements that may be used as precedents to settle future claims. However, ACE does not anticipate future changes in laws and regulations in setting its A&E reserve levels.

Prior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premiums from previous accident years. With respect to crop business, prior to the December 2010 acquisition of Rain and Hail Insurance Service, Inc. (Rain and Hail), reports relating to the previous crop year(s) were normally received in subsequent calendar years and this typically resulted in adjustments to the previously reported premiums, losses and loss expenses, and profit share commission.  Following the acquisition, such information is available before the close of the calendar year.

For purposes of analysis and disclosure, management views prior period development to be changes in the nominal value of loss estimates from period to period, net of premium and profit commission adjustments on loss sensitive contracts. Prior period development excludes changes in loss estimates that do not arise from the emergence of claims, such as those related to uncollectible reinsurance, interest, unallocated loss adjustment expenses, or foreign currency. Accordingly, specific items excluded from prior period development include the following: gains/losses related to foreign currency remeasurement; losses recognized from the early termination or commutation of reinsurance agreements that principally relate to the time value of money; changes in the value of reinsurance business assumed reflected in losses incurred but principally related to the time value of money; and losses that arise from changes in estimates of earned premiums from prior accident years. Except for foreign currency remeasurement, which is disclosed separately, these items are included in current year losses.

i) Future policy benefits
The valuation of long duration contract reserves requires management to make estimates and assumptions regarding expenses, mortality, persistency, and investment yields. Such estimates are primarily based on historical experience and information provided by ceding companies and include a margin for adverse deviation. Interest rates used in calculating reserves range from less than 1.0 percent to 4.5 percent and less than 1.0 percent to 6.0 percent at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Management monitors actual experience, and where circumstances warrant, will revise assumptions and the related reserve estimates. Revisions are recorded in the period they are determined.



F-14


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Certain of our long duration contracts are supported by assets that do not qualify for separate account reporting under GAAP. These assets are classified as trading securities and reported in Other investments and the offsetting liabilities are reported in Future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of separate account assets that do not quality for separate account reporting under GAAP are reported in Other income (expense) and the offsetting movements in the liabilities are included in Policy benefits in the consolidated statements of operations.

j) Assumed reinsurance programs involving minimum benefit guarantees under annuity contracts
ACE reinsures various death and living benefit guarantees associated with variable annuities issued primarily in the United States and Japan. Each reinsurance treaty covers variable annuities written during a limited period, typically not exceeding two years. We generally receive a monthly premium during the accumulation phase of the covered annuities (in-force) based on a percentage of either the underlying accumulated account values or the underlying accumulated guaranteed values. Depending on an annuitant's age, the accumulation phase can last many years. To limit our exposure under these programs, all reinsurance treaties include aggregate claim limits and many include an aggregate deductible.

The guarantees which are payable on death, referred to as guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB), principally cover shortfalls between accumulated account value at the time of an annuitant's death and either i) an annuitant's total deposits; ii) an annuitant's total deposits plus a minimum annual return; or iii) the highest accumulated account value attained at any policy anniversary date. In addition, a death benefit may be based on a formula specified in the variable annuity contract that uses a percentage of the growth of the underlying contract value. Liabilities for GMDBs are based on cumulative assessments or premiums to date multiplied by a benefit ratio that is determined by estimating the present value of benefit payments and related adjustment expenses divided by the present value of cumulative assessment or expected premiums during the contract period.  

Under reinsurance programs covering GLBs, we assume the risk of guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB) and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMAB) associated with variable annuity contracts. The GMIB risk is triggered if, at the time the contract holder elects to convert the accumulated account value to a periodic payment stream (annuitize), the accumulated account value is not sufficient to provide a guaranteed minimum level of monthly income. The GMAB risk is triggered if, at contract maturity, the contract holder's account value is less than a guaranteed minimum value. Our GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative for accounting purposes and is carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in income and classified as described below. As the assuming entity, we are obligated to provide coverage until the earlier of the expiration of the underlying guaranteed benefit or the treaty expiration date. Premiums received under the reinsurance treaties are classified as premium. Expected losses allocated to premiums received are classified as policy benefits and valued similar to GMDB reinsurance. Other changes in fair value, principally arising from changes in expected losses allocated to expected future premiums, are classified as Net realized gains (losses). Fair value represents management's estimate of exit price and thus includes a risk margin. We may recognize a realized loss for other changes in fair value due to adverse changes in the capital markets (i.e., declining interest rates and/or declining equity markets) and changes in policyholder behavior (i.e., increased annuitization or decreased lapse rates) although we expect the business to be profitable. We believe this presentation provides the most meaningful disclosure of changes in the underlying risk within the GLB reinsurance programs for a given reporting period. Refer to Note 5 c ) for additional information.

k ) Deposit assets and liabilities
Deposit assets arise from ceded reinsurance contracts purchased that do not transfer significant underwriting or timing risk. Under deposit accounting, consideration received or paid, excluding non-refundable fees, is recorded as a deposit asset or liability in the balance sheet as opposed to recording premiums and losses in the statement of operations. Interest income on deposits, representing the consideration received or to be received in excess of cash payments related to the deposit contract, is earned based on an effective yield calculation. The calculation of the effective yield is based on the amount and timing of actual cash flows at the balance sheet date and the estimated amount and timing of future cash flows. The effective yield is recalculated periodically to reflect revised estimates of cash flows. When a change in the actual or estimated cash flows occurs, the resulting change to the carrying amount of the deposit asset is reported as income or expense. Deposit assets of $ 138 million and $ 133 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively, are reflected in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and the accretion of deposit assets related to interest pursuant to the effective yield calculation is reflected in Net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations.

Non-refundable fees are earned based on contract terms. Non-refundable fees paid but unearned are reflected in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and earned fees are reflected in Other (income) expense in the consolidated statements of operations.




F-15


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Deposit liabilities include reinsurance deposit liabilities of $ 283 million and $ 318 million and contract holder deposit funds of $ 548 million and $ 345 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Deposit liabilities are reflected in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The reinsurance deposit liabilities arise from contracts sold for which there is not a significant transfer of risk. At contract inception, the deposit liability equals net cash received. An accretion rate is established based on actuarial estimates whereby the deposit liability is increased to the estimated amount payable over the contract term. The deposit accretion rate is the rate of return required to fund expected future payment obligations. We periodically reassess the estimated ultimate liability and related expected rate of return. Changes to the amount of the deposit liability are generally reflected through Interest expense to reflect the cumulative effect of the period the contract has been in force, and by an adjustment to the future accretion rate of the liability over the remaining estimated contract term.

Contract holder deposit funds represent a liability for investment contracts sold that do not meet the definition of an insurance contract and are sold with a guaranteed rate of return. The liability equals accumulated policy account values, which consist of the deposit payments plus credited interest, less withdrawals and amounts assessed through the end of the period.

l) Foreign currency remeasurement and translation
The functional currency for each of our foreign operations is generally the currency of the local operating environment. Transactions in currencies other than a foreign operation's functional currency are remeasured into the functional currency and the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are reflected in Net realized gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations. Functional currency assets and liabilities are translated into the reporting currency, U.S. dollars, using period end rates of exchange and the related translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of AOCI. Functional statement of operations amounts expressed in functional currencies are translated using average exchange rates. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recorded in Net realized gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations.

m) Administrative expenses
Administrative expenses generally include all operating costs other than policy acquisition costs. The Insurance – North American segment manages and uses an in-house third-party claims administrator, ESIS Inc. (ESIS).  ESIS performs claims management and risk control services for domestic and international organizations that self-insure P&C exposures as well as internal P&C exposures.  The net operating results of ESIS are included within Administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and were $ 23 million, $ 21 million, and $ 85 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively.

n ) Income taxes
Income taxes have been recorded related to those operations subject to income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. Refer to Note 8 for additional information. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance against deferred tax assets is recorded if it is more likely than not that all, or some portion, of the benefits related to deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance assessment considers tax planning strategies, where applicable.

We recognize uncertain tax positions deemed more likely than not of being sustained upon examination.  Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.

o) Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average shares outstanding including participating securities with non-forfeitable rights to dividends such as unvested restricted stock. All potentially dilutive securities including stock options are excluded from the basic earnings per share calculation. In calculating diluted earnings per share, the weighted-average shares outstanding is increased to include all potentially dilutive securities. Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the applicable weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the year.

p) Cash flow information
Premiums received and losses paid associated with the GLB reinsurance products, which as discussed previously meet the definition of a derivative instrument for accounting purposes, are included within cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.  Cash flows, such as settlements and collateral requirements, associated with GLB and all


F-16


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


other derivative instruments are included on a net basis within cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Purchases, sales, and maturities of short-term investments are recorded net for purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows and are classified with cash flows related to fixed maturities.

q) Derivatives
ACE recognizes all derivatives at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and participates in derivative instruments in two principal ways:

(i) To sell protection to customers as an insurance or reinsurance contract that meets the definition of a derivative for accounting purposes . For 2012 and 2011 , the reinsurance of GLBs was our primary product falling into this category; and
(ii) To mitigate financial risks, principally arising from investment holdings, products sold, or assets and liabilities held in foreign currencies. For these instruments, changes in assets or liabilities measured at fair value are recorded as realized gains or losses in the consolidated statement of operations.

We did not designate any derivatives as accounting hedges during 2012 , 2011 , or 2010 .

r) Share-based compensation
ACE measures and records compensation cost for all share-based payment awards at grant-date fair value. Compensation costs are recognized for share-based payment awards with only service conditions that have graded vesting schedules on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards. Refer to Note 12 for additional information.

s) New accounting pronouncements
Adopted in 2012
Accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts
In October 2010 , the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance related to the accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. Under the new guidance, the definition of acquisition costs was modified to specify that a cost must be directly related to the successful acquisition of a new or renewal insurance contract in order to be deferred. We adopted this guidance retrospectively effective January 1, 2012 and reduced Retained earnings as of January 1, 2010 by $ 116 million which represents the cumulative effect of adjustment resulting from adoption of new accounting guidance. We adjusted prior year amounts contained in this report to reflect the effect of adjustment from adoption of new accounting guidance including reducing Deferred policy acquisition costs and Retained earnings by $ 213 million and $ 181 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. The reduction to Deferred policy acquisition costs is primarily due to lower deferrals associated with unsuccessful efforts. We also reduced Net income by $ 45 million, or $ 0.13 per share, and $ 23 million, or $ 0.07 per share, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 , respectively.

Fair value measurements
In May 2011 , the FASB issued new guidance on fair value measurements to revise the wording used to describe the requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements.  The guidance is not necessarily intended to result in a significant change in the application of the current requirements.  Instead, it is intended to clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements.  It also changes certain principles or requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair value measurements. We adopted this guidance prospectively effective January 1, 2012. The application of this guidance resulted in additional fair value measurements disclosures only and did not impact our financial condition or results of operations. 

Adopted in 2011
Testing goodwill for impairment
In September 2011 , the FASB issued new accounting guidance which eliminates the requirement to calculate the fair value of reporting units at least annually and replaces it with an optional qualitative assessment. This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 , with early adoption permitted.  We adopted this guidance on October 1, 2011 . The application of the new guidance resulted in a change in the procedures for assessing goodwill impairment, and did not impact our financial condition or results of operations. 




F-17


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


2 . Acquisitions

On June 13, 2012, we announced that we and our local partner had signed a definitive agreement to acquire PT Asuransi Jaya Proteksi (JaPro), one of Indonesia's leading general insurers. On September 18, 2012, we acquired 80 percent of JaPro and on January 3, 2013 our local partner acquired the remaining 20 percent . The total purchase price for 100 percent of the company was approximately $ 107 million in cash. The information needed to complete the purchase price allocation is preliminary and will be adjusted as further information becomes available during the measurement period. JaPro operates in our Insurance – Overseas General segment.

On September 12, 2012, we announced that we reached a definitive agreement to acquire Fianzas Monterrey, a leading surety lines company in Mexico offering administrative performance bonds primarily to clients in the construction and industrial sectors, for approximately $ 285 million in cash. This transaction, which is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, is expected to be completed in the first half of 2013.

On October 18, 2012, we announced that we reached a definitive agreement to acquire ABA Seguros, a property and casualty insurer in Mexico that provides automobile, homeowners, and small business coverages. We expect to pay approximately $ 865 million in cash for this transaction, subject to adjustment for dividends paid between signing and closing. This transaction, which is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, is expected to be completed in the first half of 2013.
Prior year acquisitions
We acquired New York Life’s Korea operations on February 1, 2011 and New York Life’s Hong Kong operations on April 1, 2011 for approximately $ 450 million in cash. These acquired businesses operate in our Life segment, expand our presence in the North Asia market and complement our life insurance business established in that region. In 2012, we finalized purchase price allocations resulting in $ 91 million of goodwill, none of which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, and $ 163 million of intangible assets. The most significant intangible asset is VOBA.
We acquired Penn Millers Holding Corporation (PMHC) on November 30, 2011 for approximately $ 107 million in cash. PMHC’s primary insurance subsidiary, Penn Millers Insurance Company (Penn Millers), is a well-established underwriter in the agribusiness market since 1887. PMHC operates in our Insurance – North American segment.
We acquired Rio Guayas Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros (Rio Guayas), a general insurance company in Ecuador on December 28, 2011 for approximately $ 65 million in cash. Rio Guayas sells a range of insurance products, including automobile, life, property, and A&H. The acquisition of Rio Guayas expands our capabilities in terms of geography, products, and distribution. Rio Guayas operates in our Insurance – Overseas General segment.

On December 28, 2010, we acquired all the outstanding common stock of Rain and Hail Insurance Service, Inc. (Rain and Hail) not previously owned by us for approximately $ 1.1 billion in cash. Rain and Hail has served America's farmers since 1919, providing comprehensive multiple peril crop and crop-hail insurance protection to customers in the U.S. and Canada. This acquisition is consistent with our strategy to expand our specialty lines business and provides further diversification of our global product mix.

Prior to the consummation of this business combination, our 20.1 percent ownership in Rain and Hail was recorded in Investments in partially-owned insurance companies in the consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with GAAP, at the date of the business combination, we were deemed to have disposed of our 20.1 percent ownership interest and recognized 100 percent of the assets and liabilities of Rain and Hail at acquisition date fair value. In connection with this deemed disposition, we recognized a $ 175 million gain in Net realized gains (losses) in the consolidated statement of operations, which represents the excess of acquisition date fair value of the 20.1 percent ownership interest over the cost basis. Acquisition date fair value of the 20.1 percent ownership interest was determined by first calculating the implied fair value of 100 percent of Rain and Hail based on the purchase price for the net assets not previously owned by us at the acquisition date. The implied fair value of the 20.1 percent ownership interest was then reduced to reflect a noncontrolling interest discount. The acquisition generated $ 123 million of goodwill, none of which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, and $ 523 million of other intangible assets based on our purchase price allocation. Goodwill and other intangible assets arising from this acquisition are included in our Insurance – North American segment. Legal and other expenses incurred to complete the acquisition amounted to $ 2 million and are included in Other (income) expense.



F-18


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


On December 1, 2010, we acquired Jerneh Insurance Berhad (Jerneh), a general insurance company in Malaysia, for approximately $ 218 million in cash. The acquisitions of Rain and Hail and Jerneh were financed with cash on hand and the use of reverse repurchase agreements of $ 1 billion.

The consolidated financial statements include the results of these acquired businesses from the date of acquisition.

3 . Investments

a) Fixed maturities
The following tables present the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities and related OTTI recognized in AOCI:
December 31, 2012
Amortized
Cost

 
Gross
Unrealized
Appreciation

 
Gross
Unrealized
Depreciation

 
Fair
Value

 
OTTI Recognized
in AOCI

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
3,553

 
$
183

 
$
(1
)
 
$
3,735

 
$

Foreign
13,016

 
711

 
(14
)
 
13,713

 

Corporate securities
15,529

 
1,210

 
(31
)
 
16,708

 
(7
)
Mortgage-backed securities
10,051

 
458

 
(36
)
 
10,473

 
(84
)
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
2,517

 
163

 
(3
)
 
2,677

 

 
$
44,666

 
$
2,725

 
$
(85
)
 
$
47,306

 
$
(91
)
Held to maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
1,044

 
$
39

 
$

 
$
1,083

 
$

Foreign
910

 
54

 

 
964

 

Corporate securities
2,133

 
142

 

 
2,275

 

Mortgage-backed securities
2,028

 
88

 

 
2,116

 

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
1,155

 
44

 
(4
)
 
1,195

 

 
$
7,270

 
$
367

 
$
(4
)
 
$
7,633

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2011
Amortized
Cost

 
Gross
Unrealized
Appreciation

 
Gross
Unrealized
Depreciation

 
Fair
Value

 
OTTI Recognized
in AOCI

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
2,774

 
$
186

 
$

 
$
2,960

 
$

Foreign
12,025

 
475

 
(99
)
 
12,401

 
(2
)
Corporate securities
14,055

 
773

 
(135
)
 
14,693

 
(22
)
Mortgage-backed securities
9,979

 
397

 
(175
)
 
10,201

 
(151
)
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
1,617

 
96

 
(1
)
 
1,712

 

 
$
40,450

 
$
1,927

 
$
(410
)
 
$
41,967

 
$
(175
)
Held to maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
1,078

 
$
48

 
$

 
$
1,126

 
$

Foreign
935

 
18

 
(23
)
 
930

 

Corporate securities
2,338

 
44

 
(45
)
 
2,337

 

Mortgage-backed securities
2,949

 
90

 
(3
)
 
3,036

 

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
1,147

 
32

 
(3
)
 
1,176

 

 
$
8,447

 
$
232

 
$
(74
)
 
$
8,605

 
$

 
As discussed in Note 3 d), if a credit loss is indicated on an impaired fixed maturity, an OTTI is considered to have occurred and the portion of the impairment not related to credit losses (non-credit OTTI) is recognized in OCI. Included in the “OTTI Recognized in AOCI” columns above are the cumulative amounts of non-credit OTTI recognized in OCI adjusted for subsequent



F-19


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


sales, maturities, and redemptions. OTTI Recognized in AOCI does not include the impact of subsequent changes in fair value of the related securities. In periods subsequent to a recognition of OTTI in OCI, changes in the fair value of the related fixed maturities are reflected in Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in the consolidated statement of shareholders' equity. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 , $ 137 million of net unrealized appreciation and $ 48 million of net unrealized depreciation, respectively, related to such securities is included in OCI. At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , AOCI includes net unrealized depreciation of $ 25 million and $ 155 million, respectively, related to securities remaining in the investment portfolio at those dates for which ACE has recognized a non-credit OTTI.
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued by U.S. government agencies are combined with all other to be announced mortgage derivatives held (refer to Note 10 a) (iv)) and are included in the category, “Mortgage-backed securities”. Approximately 85 percent and 84 percent of the total mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 , respectively, are represented by investments in U.S. government agency bonds. The remainder of the mortgage exposure consists of collateralized mortgage obligations and non-government mortgage-backed securities, the majority of which provide a planned structure for principal and interest payments and carry a rating of AAA by the major credit rating agencies.
The following table presents fixed maturities by contractual maturity: 
 
December 31
 
 
December 31
 
 
 
 
2012

 
 
 
2011

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Amortized Cost

 
Fair Value

 
Amortized Cost

 
Fair Value

Available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due in 1 year or less
$
1,887

 
$
1,906

 
$
2,321

 
$
2,349

Due after 1 year through 5 years
13,411

 
14,010

 
12,325

 
12,722

Due after 5 years through 10 years
15,032

 
16,153

 
12,379

 
12,995

Due after 10 years
4,285

 
4,764

 
3,446

 
3,700

 
34,615

 
36,833

 
30,471

 
31,766

Mortgage-backed securities
10,051

 
10,473

 
9,979

 
10,201

 
$
44,666

 
$
47,306

 
$
40,450

 
$
41,967

Held to maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due in 1 year or less
$
656

 
$
659

 
$
393

 
$
396

Due after 1 year through 5 years
1,870

 
1,950

 
2,062

 
2,090

Due after 5 years through 10 years
2,119

 
2,267

 
2,376

 
2,399

Due after 10 years
597

 
641

 
667

 
684

 
5,242

 
5,517

 
5,498

 
5,569

Mortgage-backed securities
2,028

 
2,116

 
2,949

 
3,036

 
$
7,270

 
$
7,633

 
$
8,447

 
$
8,605

Expected maturities could differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without call or prepayment penalties. 


F-20


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



b) Equity securities
The following table presents the cost and fair value of equity securities:
 
December 31


December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012


2011

Cost
$
707

 
$
671

Gross unrealized appreciation
41

 
18

Gross unrealized depreciation
(4
)
 
(42
)
Fair value
$
744

 
$
647

c) Net realized gains (losses)
In accordance with guidance related to the recognition and presentation of OTTI, when an impairment related to a fixed maturity has occurred, OTTI is required to be recorded in net income if management has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost. Further, in cases where we do not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the security, ACE must evaluate the security to determine the portion of the impairment, if any, related to credit losses. If a credit loss is indicated, an OTTI is considered to have occurred and any portion of the OTTI related to credit losses must be reflected in net income while the portion of OTTI related to all other factors is recognized in OCI. For fixed maturities held to maturity, OTTI recognized in OCI is accreted from AOCI to the amortized cost of the fixed maturity prospectively over the remaining term of the securities.
Each quarter, securities in an unrealized loss position (impaired securities), including fixed maturities, securities lending collateral, equity securities, and other investments, are reviewed to identify impaired securities to be specifically evaluated for a potential OTTI.
For all non-fixed maturities, OTTI is evaluated based on the following:
the amount of time a security has been in a loss position and the magnitude of the loss position;
the period in which cost is expected to be recovered, if at all, based on various criteria including economic conditions and other issuer-specific developments; and
ACE’s ability and intent to hold the security to the expected recovery period.
As a general rule, we also consider that equity securities in an unrealized loss position for twelve consecutive months are other than temporarily impaired.

Evaluation of potential credit losses related to fixed maturities
We review each fixed maturity in an unrealized loss position to assess whether the security is a candidate for credit loss. Specifically, we consider credit rating, market price, and issuer-specific financial information, among other factors, to assess the likelihood of collection of all principal and interest as contractually due. Securities for which we determine that credit loss is likely are subjected to further analysis to estimate the credit loss recognized in net income, if any. In general, credit loss recognized in net income equals the difference between the security’s amortized cost and the net present value of its projected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security. All significant assumptions used in determining credit losses are subject to change as market conditions evolve.

U.S. Treasury and agency obligations (including agency mortgage-backed securities), foreign government obligations, and states, municipalities, and political subdivisions obligations
U.S. Treasury and agency obligations (including agency mortgage-backed securities), foreign government obligations, and states, municipalities, and political subdivisions obligations represent less than $ 18 million of gross unrealized loss at December 31, 2012 . These securities were evaluated for credit loss primarily using qualitative assessments of the likelihood of credit loss considering credit rating of the issuers and level of credit enhancement, if any. ACE concluded that the high level of creditworthiness of the issuers coupled with credit enhancement, where applicable, supports recognizing no credit loss in net income.




F-21


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Corporate securities
Projected cash flows for corporate securities (principally senior unsecured bonds) are driven primarily by assumptions regarding probability of default and also the timing and amount of recoveries associated with defaults. We develop these estimates using information based on market observable data, issuer-specific information, and credit ratings. ACE developed its default assumption by using historical default data by Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) rating category to calculate a 1-in-100 year probability of default, which results in a default assumption in excess of the historical mean default rate. We believe that use of a default assumption in excess of the historical mean is reasonable in light of current market conditions.

The following table presents default assumptions by Moody's rating category (historical mean default rate provided for comparison):
Moody's Rating Category
1-in-100 Year Default Rate

 
Historical Mean Default Rate

Investment Grade:
 
 
 
Aaa-Baa
0.0-1.4%

 
0.0-0.3%

Below Investment Grade:
 
 
 
Ba
4.9
%
 
1.1
%
B
12.8
%
 
3.4
%
Caa-C
53.4
%
 
13.8
%

Consistent with management's approach to developing default rate assumptions considering recent market conditions, ACE assumed a 32 percent recovery rate (the par value of a defaulted security that will be recovered) across all rating categories rather than using Moody's historical mean recovery rate of 42 percent . ACE believes that use of a recovery rate assumption lower than the historical mean is reasonable in light of recent market conditions.
Application of the methodology and assumptions described above resulted in credit losses recognized in net income for corporate securities of $ 14 million, $ 9 million, and $ 14 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively.

Mortgage-backed securities
For mortgage-backed securities, credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then projects the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, and loss severity rates (the par value of a defaulted security that will not be recovered) on foreclosed properties.

ACE develops specific assumptions using market data, where available, and includes internal estimates as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. ACE projects default rates by mortgage sector considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming lower loss severity for Prime sector bonds versus ALT-A and Sub-prime bonds.

These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total lifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions used contemplate the actual collateral attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating agency loss projections, rating actions, and current market prices. If cash flow projections indicate that losses will exceed the credit enhancement for a given tranche, then we do not expect to recover our amortized cost basis and we recognize an estimated credit loss in net income.

Application of the methodology and assumptions described above resulted in credit losses recognized in net income for mortgage-backed securities of $ 6 million, $ 11 million, and $ 32 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively.


F-22


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following table presents the Net realized gains (losses) and the losses included in Net realized gains (losses) and OCI as a result of conditions which caused us to conclude the decline in fair value of certain investments was “other-than-temporary” and the change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments: 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Fixed maturities:
 
 
 
 
 
OTTI on fixed maturities, gross
$
(26
)
 
$
(61
)
 
$
(115
)
OTTI on fixed maturities recognized in OCI (pre-tax)
1

 
15

 
69

OTTI on fixed maturities, net
(25
)
 
(46
)
 
(46
)
Gross realized gains excluding OTTI
388

 
410

 
569

Gross realized losses excluding OTTI
(133
)
 
(200
)
 
(143
)
Total fixed maturities
230

 
164

 
380

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
OTTI on equity securities
(5
)
 
(1
)
 

Gross realized gains excluding OTTI
11

 
15

 
86

Gross realized losses excluding OTTI
(2
)
 
(5
)
 
(2
)
Total equity securities
4

 
9

 
84

OTTI on other investments
(7
)
 
(3
)
 
(13
)
Foreign exchange losses
(16
)
 
(13
)
 
(54
)
Investment and embedded derivative instruments
(6
)
 
(143
)
 
58

Fair value adjustments on insurance derivative
171

 
(779
)
 
(28
)
S&P put options and futures
(297
)
 
(4
)
 
(150
)
Other derivative instruments
(4
)
 
(4
)
 
(19
)
Other
3

 
(22
)
 
174

Net realized gains (losses)
78

 
(795
)
 
432

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities available for sale
1,099

 
569

 
451

Fixed maturities held to maturity
(94
)
 
(89
)
 
522

Equity securities
61

 
(47
)
 
(44
)
Other
50

 
40

 
(35
)
Income tax expense
(198
)
 
(157
)
 
(152
)
Change in net unrealized appreciation on investments
918

 
316

 
742

Total net realized gains (losses) and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
$
996

 
$
(479
)
 
$
1,174

 



F-23


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following table presents a roll-forward of pre-tax credit losses related to fixed maturities for which a portion of OTTI was recognized in OCI: 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Balance of credit losses related to securities still held – beginning of year
$
74

 
$
137

 
$
174

Additions where no OTTI was previously recorded
8

 
12

 
34

Additions where an OTTI was previously recorded
12

 
8

 
12

Reductions for securities sold during the period
(51
)
 
(83
)
 
(83
)
Balance of credit losses related to securities still held – end of year
$
43

 
$
74

 
$
137

d) Other investments
The following table presents the fair value and cost of other investments:
 
 
 
December 31

 
 
 
December 31

 
 
 
2012

 
 
 
2011

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Fair Value

 
Cost

 
Fair Value

 
Cost

Investment funds
$
395

 
$
278

 
$
378

 
$
277

Limited partnerships
531

 
398

 
531

 
429

Partially-owned investment companies
1,186

 
1,187

 
904

 
904

Life insurance policies
148

 
148

 
127

 
127

Policy loans
164

 
164

 
143

 
143

Trading securities
243

 
242

 
194

 
195

Other
49

 
48

 
37

 
37

Total
$
2,716

 
$
2,465

 
$
2,314

 
$
2,112


Investment funds include one highly diversified fund investment as well as several direct funds that employ a variety of investment styles such as long/short equity and arbitrage/distressed. Included in limited partnerships and partially-owned investment companies are 65 individual limited partnerships covering a broad range of investment strategies including large cap buyouts, specialist buyouts, growth capital, distressed, mezzanine, real estate, and co-investments. The underlying portfolio consists of various public and private debt and equity securities of publicly traded and privately held companies and real estate assets.  The underlying investments across various partnerships, geographies, industries, asset types, and investment strategies provide risk diversification within the limited partnership portfolio and the overall investment portfolio.  Trading securities comprise $ 212 million of mutual funds supported by assets that do not quality for separate account reporting under GAAP at December 31, 2012 compared with $ 162 million at December 31, 2011 . Trading securities also includes assets held in rabbi trusts of $ 23 million of equity securities and $ 8 million of fixed maturities at December 31, 2012 , compared with $ 24 million of equity securities and $ 8 million of fixed maturities at December 31, 2011 .



F-24


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


e) Investments in partially-owned insurance companies
The following table presents Investments in partially-owned insurance companies:
 
December 31
 
 
December 31
 
 
 
 
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages)
Carrying Value

 
Issued Share Capital

 
Ownership Percentage

 
Carrying Value

 
Issued Share Capital

 
Ownership Percentage

 
Domicile
Huatai Group
$
350

(1)  
$
474

 
20.0
%
 
$
228

 
$
457

 
20.0
%
 
China
Huatai Life Insurance Company
84

 
205

 
20.0
%
 
103

 
196

 
20.0
%
 
China
Freisenbruch-Meyer
9

 
6

 
40.0
%
 
8

 
5

 
40.0
%
 
Bermuda
ACE Cooperative Ins. Co. - Saudi Arabia
9

 
27

 
30.0
%
 
7

 
27

 
30.0
%
 
Saudi Arabia
Russian Reinsurance Company
2

 
4

 
23.3
%
 
2

 
4

 
23.3
%
 
Russia
Island Heritage

 

 

 
4

 
27

 
10.8
%
 
Cayman Islands
Total
$
454

 
$
716

 
 
 
$
352

 
$
716

 
 
 
 
(1)  
Includes additional investment of approximately $ 100 million which is pending regulatory approval.
Huatai Group and Huatai Life Insurance Company provide a range of P&C, life, and investment products.

f) Gross unrealized loss
At December 31, 2012 , there were 2,029 fixed maturities out of a total of 23,679 fixed maturities in an unrealized loss position. The largest single unrealized loss in the fixed maturities was $5 million. There were 56 equity securities out of a total of 193 equity securities in an unrealized loss position. The largest single unrealized loss in the equity securities was $1 million. Fixed maturities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2012 comprised both investment grade and below investment grade securities for which fair value declined primarily due to widening credit spreads since the date of purchase.

The following tables present, for all securities in an unrealized loss position (including securities on loan), the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time the security has continuously been in an unrealized loss position:
 
0 – 12 Months
 
 
Over 12 Months
 
 
Total
 
December 31, 2012
Fair Value

 
Gross
Unrealized Loss

 
Fair Value

 
Gross
Unrealized Loss

 
Fair Value

 
Gross
Unrealized Loss

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
440

 
$
(1.4
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
440

 
$
(1.4
)
Foreign
1,234

 
(8.6
)
 
88

 
(5.8
)
 
1,322

 
(14.4
)
Corporate securities
1,026

 
(22.7
)
 
85

 
(7.9
)
 
1,111

 
(30.6
)
Mortgage-backed securities
855

 
(3.8
)
 
356

 
(32.6
)
 
1,211

 
(36.4
)
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
316

 
(3.0
)
 
48

 
(3.6
)
 
364

 
(6.6
)
Total fixed maturities
3,871

 
(39.5
)
 
577

 
(49.9
)
 
4,448

 
(89.4
)
Equity securities
29

 
(4.2
)
 

 

 
29

 
(4.2
)
Other investments
68

 
(4.9
)
 

 

 
68

 
(4.9
)
Total
$
3,968

 
$
(48.6
)
 
$
577

 
$
(49.9
)
 
$
4,545

 
$
(98.5
)
 



F-25


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


 
0 – 12 Months
 
 
Over 12 Months
 
 
Total
 
December 31, 2011
Fair Value

 
Gross
Unrealized Loss

 
Fair Value

 
Gross
Unrealized Loss

 
Fair Value

 
Gross
Unrealized Loss

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign
$
1,801

 
$
(82.2
)
 
$
529

 
$
(40.0
)
 
$
2,330

 
$
(122.2
)
Corporate securities
3,084

 
(148.2
)
 
268

 
(32.2
)
 
3,352

 
(180.4
)
Mortgage-backed securities
440

 
(7.5
)
 
586

 
(170.2
)
 
1,026

 
(177.7
)
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
30

 
(0.4
)
 
98

 
(3.5
)
 
128

 
(3.9
)
Total fixed maturities
5,355

 
(238.3
)
 
1,481

 
(245.9
)
 
6,836

 
(484.2
)
Equity securities
484

 
(42.3
)
 

 

 
484

 
(42.3
)
Other investments
88

 
(8.3
)
 

 

 
88

 
(8.3
)
Total
$
5,927

 
$
(288.9
)
 
$
1,481

 
$
(245.9
)
 
$
7,408

 
$
(534.8
)
g) Net investment income
The following table presents the sources of net investment income:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Fixed maturities
$
2,134

 
$
2,196

 
$
2,071

Short-term investments
28

 
43

 
34

Equity securities
34

 
36

 
26

Other
104

 
62

 
44

Gross investment income
2,300

 
2,337

 
2,175

Investment expenses
(119
)
 
(95
)
 
(105
)
Net investment income
$
2,181

 
$
2,242

 
$
2,070

h) Restricted assets
ACE is required to maintain assets on deposit with various regulatory authorities to support its insurance and reinsurance operations. These requirements are generally promulgated in the statutory regulations of the individual jurisdictions. The assets on deposit are available to settle insurance and reinsurance liabilities. ACE is also required to restrict assets pledged under reverse repurchase agreements. We also use trust funds in certain large reinsurance transactions where the trust funds are set up for the benefit of the ceding companies and generally take the place of letter of credit (LOC) requirements. We also have investments in segregated portfolios primarily to provide collateral or guarantees for LOCs and derivative transactions. Included in restricted assets at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , are fixed maturities and short-term investments totaling $16.6 billion and $14.9 billion, respectively, and cash of $139 million and $179 million, respectively.
The following table presents the components of restricted assets: 
 
December 31

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

Trust funds
$
11,389

 
$
9,940

Deposits with non-U.S. regulatory authorities
2,133

 
2,240

Assets pledged under reverse repurchase agreements
1,401

 
1,251

Deposits with U.S. regulatory authorities
1,338

 
1,307

Other pledged assets
456

 
364

 
$
16,717

 
$
15,102




F-26


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


4 . Fair value measurements
a ) Fair value hierarchy
Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities is estimated based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The guidance defines fair value as the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy in which inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value are classified. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data.
 
The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
Level 2 – Includes, among other items, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as interest rates and yield curves, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; and
Level 3 – Inputs that are unobservable and reflect management’s judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
We categorize financial instruments within the valuation hierarchy at the balance sheet date based upon the lowest level of inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement. Accordingly, transfers between levels within the valuation hierarchy occur when there are significant changes to the inputs, such as increases or decreases in market activity, changes to the availability of current prices, changes to the transparency to underlying inputs, and whether there are significant variances in quoted prices. Transfers in and/or out of any level are assumed to occur at the end of the period.

We use one or more pricing services to obtain fair value measurements for the majority of the investment securities we hold. Based on management’s understanding of the methodologies used, these pricing services only produce an estimate of fair value if there is observable market information that would allow them to make a fair value estimate. Based on our understanding of the market inputs used by the pricing services, all applicable investments have been valued in accordance with GAAP. We do not typically adjust prices obtained from pricing services. The following is a description of the valuation techniques and inputs used to determine fair values for financial instruments carried at fair value, as well as the general classification of such financial instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Fixed maturities
We use pricing services to estimate fair value measurements for the majority of our fixed maturities. The pricing services use market quotations for fixed maturities that have quoted prices in active markets; such securities are classified within Level 1. For fixed maturities other than U.S. Treasury securities that generally do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing services prepare estimates of fair value measurements using their pricing applications, which include available relevant market information, benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing. Additional valuation factors that can be taken into account are nominal spreads, dollar basis, and liquidity adjustments. The pricing services evaluate each asset class based on relevant market and credit information, perceived market movements, and sector news. The market inputs used in the pricing evaluation, listed in the approximate order of priority include: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, reference data, and industry and economic events. The extent of the use of each input is dependent on the asset class and the market conditions. Given the asset class, the priority of the use of inputs may change or some market inputs may not be relevant. Additionally, the valuation of fixed maturities is more subjective when markets are less liquid due to the lack of market based inputs (i.e., stale pricing), which may increase the potential that the estimated fair value of an investment is not reflective of the price at which an actual transaction would occur. The overwhelming majority of fixed maturities are classified within Level 2 because the most significant inputs used in the pricing techniques are observable. For a small number of fixed maturities, we obtain a quote from a broker (typically a market maker). Due to the disclaimers on the quotes that indicate that the price is indicative only, we include these fair value estimates in Level 3. 

Equity securities
Equity securities with active markets are classified within Level 1 as fair values are based on quoted market prices. For equity securities in markets which are less active, fair values are based on market valuations and are classified within Level 2. Equity securities for which pricing is unobservable are classified within Level 3.




F-27


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



Short-term investments
Short-term investments, which comprise securities due to mature within one year of the date of purchase that are traded in active markets, are classified within Level 1 as fair values are based on quoted market prices. Securities such as commercial paper and discount notes are classified within Level 2 because these securities are typically not actively traded due to their approaching maturity and, as such, their cost approximates fair value.

Other investments
Fair values for the majority of Other investments including investments in partially-owned investment companies, investment funds, and limited partnerships are based on their respective net asset values or equivalent (NAV). The majority of these investments, for which NAV was used as a practical expedient to measure fair value, are classified within Level 3 because either ACE will never have the contractual option to redeem the investments or will not have the contractual option to redeem the investments in the near term. The remainder of such investments is classified within Level 2. Certain of our long duration contracts are supported by assets that do not qualify for separate account reporting under GAAP. These assets comprise mutual funds classified within Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy on the same basis as other equity securities traded in active markets. Other investments also includes equity securities and fixed maturities held in rabbi trusts maintained by ACE for deferred compensation plans, which are classified within the valuation hierarchy on the same basis as other equity securities and fixed maturities.

Securities lending collateral
The underlying assets included in Securities lending collateral in the consolidated balance sheets are fixed maturities which are classified in the valuation hierarchy on the same basis as other fixed maturities. Excluded from the valuation hierarchy is the corresponding liability related to ACE’s obligation to return the collateral plus interest as it is reported at contract value and not fair value in the consolidated balance sheets.

Investment derivative instruments
Actively traded investment derivative instruments, including futures, options, and exchange-traded forward contracts are classified within Level 1 as fair values are based on quoted market prices. The fair value of cross-currency swaps are based on market valuations and are classified within Level 2. Investment derivative instruments are recorded in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Other derivative instruments
We maintain positions in other derivative instruments including exchange-traded equity futures contracts and option contracts designed to limit exposure to a severe equity market decline, which would cause an increase in expected claims and, therefore, reserves for our guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB) and guaranteed living benefits (GLB) reinsurance business. Our position in exchange-traded equity futures contracts is classified within Level 1. The fair value of the majority of the remaining positions in other derivative instruments is based on significant observable inputs including equity security and interest rate indices. Accordingly, these are classified within Level 2. Our position in credit default swaps is typically included within Level 3. Other derivative instruments are recorded in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.


F-28


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



Separate account assets
Separate account assets represent segregated funds where investment risks are borne by the customers, except to the extent of certain guarantees made by ACE. Separate account assets comprise mutual funds classified in the valuation hierarchy on the same basis as other equity securities traded in active markets and are classified within Level 1. Separate account assets also include fixed maturities classified within Level 2 because the most significant inputs used in the pricing techniques are observable. Excluded from the valuation hierarchy are the corresponding liabilities as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. Separate account assets are recorded in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Guaranteed living benefits
The GLB arises from life reinsurance programs covering living benefit guarantees whereby we assume the risk of guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB) and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMAB) associated with variable annuity contracts. GLB’s are recorded in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities and Future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. For GLB reinsurance, ACE estimates fair value using an internal valuation model which includes current market information and estimates of policyholder behavior. All of the treaties contain claim limits, which are factored into the valuation model. The fair value depends on a number of inputs, including changes in interest rates, changes in equity markets, credit risk, current account value, changes in market volatility, expected annuitization rates, changes in policyholder behavior, and changes in policyholder mortality.
The most significant policyholder behavior assumptions include lapse rates and the GMIB annuitization rates. Assumptions regarding lapse rates and GMIB annuitization rates differ by treaty but the underlying methodologies to determine rates applied to each treaty are comparable. The assumptions regarding lapse and GMIB annuitization rates determined for each treaty are based on a dynamic calculation that uses several underlying factors.
A lapse rate is the percentage of in-force policies surrendered in a given calendar year. All else equal, as lapse rates increase, ultimate claim payments will decrease. In general, the base lapse function assumes low lapse rates (ranging from about 1 percent to 6 percent per annum) during the surrender charge period of the GMIB contract, followed by a “spike” lapse rate (ranging from about 10 percent to 30 percent per annum) in the year immediately following the surrender charge period, and then reverting to an ultimate lapse rate (generally around 10 percent per annum), typically over a 2 -year period. This base rate is adjusted downward for policies with more valuable guarantees (policies with guaranteed values far in excess of their account values) by multiplying the base lapse rate by a factor ranging from 15 percent to 75 percent . Additional lapses due to partial withdrawals and older policyholders with tax-qualified contracts (due to required minimum distributions) are also included.
The GMIB annuitization rate is the percentage of policies for which the policyholder will elect to annuitize using the guaranteed benefit provided under the GMIB. All else equal, as GMIB annuitization rates increase, ultimate claim payments will increase, subject to treaty claim limits. In general ACE assumes that GMIB annuitization rates will be higher for policies with more valuable guarantees (policies with guaranteed values far in excess of their account values). In addition, we also assume that GMIB annuitization rates are higher in the first year immediately following the waiting period (the first year the policies are eligible to annuitize using the GMIB) in comparison to all subsequent years. We do not yet have a robust set of annuitization experience because most of our clients’ policyholders are not yet eligible to annuitize using the GMIB. However, for certain clients representing approximately 36 percent of the total GMIB guaranteed value there are several years of annuitization experience. For these clients the annuitization function reflects the actual experience and has a maximum annuitization rate per annum of 8 percent (a higher maximum applies in the first year a policy is eligible to annuitize using the GMIB—it is over 13 percent ). For most clients, there is not a credible amount of observable relevant behavior data and so we use a weighted-average (with a heavier weighting on the observed experience noted previously) of three different annuitization functions with maximum annuitization rates per annum of 8 percent , 12 percent , and 30 percent , respectively (with significantly higher rates in the first year a policy is eligible to annuitize using the GMIB). The GMIB reinsurance treaties include claim limits to protect ACE in the event that actual annuitization behavior is significantly higher than expected.
The effect of changes in key market factors on assumed lapse and annuitization rates reflect emerging trends using data available from cedants. For treaties with limited experience, rates are established in line with data received from other ceding companies adjusted, as appropriate, with industry estimates. The model and related assumptions are continuously re-evaluated by management and enhanced, as appropriate, based upon additional experience obtained related to policyholder behavior and availability of more information, such as market conditions, market participant assumptions, and demographics of in-force annuities. During 2012 , no material changes were made to actuarial or behavioral assumptions. We made minor technical refinements to the model with a favorable net income impact of approximately $ 49 million, $ 14 million, and $ 98 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively.



F-29


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


We view the variable annuity reinsurance business as having a similar risk profile to that of catastrophe reinsurance, with the probability of a cumulative long-term economic net loss relatively small at the time of pricing. However, adverse changes in market factors and policyholder behavior will have an adverse impact on net income, which may be material. Because of the significant use of unobservable inputs including policyholder behavior, GLB reinsurance is classified within Level 3.
The following tables present, by valuation hierarchy, the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis: 
December 31, 2012
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

 
Total

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
2,050

 
$
1,685

 
$

 
$
3,735

Foreign
222

 
13,431

 
60

 
13,713

Corporate securities
20

 
16,586

 
102

 
16,708

Mortgage-backed securities

 
10,460

 
13

 
10,473

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 
2,677

 

 
2,677

 
2,292

 
44,839

 
175

 
47,306

Equity securities
253

 
488

 
3

 
744

Short-term investments
1,503

 
725

 

 
2,228

Other investments
268

 
196

 
2,252

 
2,716

Securities lending collateral

 
1,791

 

 
1,791

Investment derivative instruments
11

 

 

 
11

Other derivative instruments
(6
)
 
30

 

 
24

Separate account assets
872

 
71

 

 
943

Total assets measured at fair value
$
5,193

 
$
48,140

 
$
2,430

 
$
55,763

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GLB (1)
$

 
$

 
$
1,119

 
$
1,119

(1)  
Our GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative instrument for accounting purposes and is accordingly carried at fair value. Excluded from the table above is the portion of the GLB derivative liability classified as Future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 5 c ) for additional information.

 


F-30


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


December 31, 2011
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

 
Total

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
1,691

 
$
1,264

 
$
5

 
$
2,960

Foreign
212

 
12,156

 
33

 
12,401

Corporate securities
20

 
14,539

 
134

 
14,693

Mortgage-backed securities

 
10,173

 
28

 
10,201

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 
1,711

 
1

 
1,712

 
1,923

 
39,843

 
201

 
41,967

Equity securities
215

 
419

 
13

 
647

Short-term investments
1,246

 
1,055

 

 
2,301

Other investments
208

 
229

 
1,877

 
2,314

Securities lending collateral

 
1,375

 

 
1,375

Investment derivative instruments
10

 

 

 
10

Other derivative instruments
(16
)
 
54

 
3

 
41

Separate account assets
607

 
53

 

 
660

Total assets measured at fair value
$
4,193

 
$
43,028

 
$
2,094

 
$
49,315

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GLB (1)
$

 
$

 
$
1,319

 
$
1,319

(1)  
Our GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative instrument for accounting purposes and is accordingly carried at fair value. Excluded from the table above is the portion of the GLB derivative liability classified as Future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 5 c ) for additional information.
The transfers from Level 1 to Level 2 were $ 40 million and the transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 were $ 15 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 . The transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material. Level 2 equity securities in the above table at December 31, 2011 were adjusted to include a $ 417 million investment previously classified as Level 1.



F-31


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



Fair value of alternative investments
Included in Other investments in the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are investment funds, limited partnerships, and partially-owned investment companies measured at fair value using NAV as a practical expedient. At December 31, 2012 , there were no probable or pending sales related to any of the investments measured at fair value using NAV. 
The following table presents, by investment category, the expected liquidation period, fair value, and maximum future funding commitments of alternative investments: 
 
 
 
December 31
 
 
December 31
 
 
 
 
2012
 
 
2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Expected
Liquidation
Period
 
Fair Value

 
Maximum
Future Funding
Commitments

 
Fair Value

 
Maximum
Future Funding
Commitments

Financial
5 to 9 Years
 
$
225

 
$
111

 
$
205

 
$
141

Real estate
3 to 9 Years
 
292

 
62

 
270

 
96

Distressed
6 to 9 Years
 
192

 
152

 
182

 
57

Mezzanine
6 to 9 Years
 
284

 
279

 
195

 
282

Traditional
3 to 8 Years
 
711

 
587

 
565

 
200

Vintage
1 to 3 Years
 
14

 

 
18

 
1

Investment funds
Not Applicable
 
395

 

 
378

 

 
 
 
$
2,113

 
$
1,191

 
$
1,813

 
$
777

Included in all categories in the above table except for Investment funds are investments for which ACE will never have the contractual option to redeem but receives distributions based on the liquidation of the underlying assets. Included in the “Expected Liquidation Period” column above is the range in years over which ACE expects the majority of underlying assets in the respective categories to be liquidated. Further, for all categories except for Investment funds, ACE does not have the ability to sell or transfer the investments without the consent from the general partner of individual funds.

Financial
Financial consists of investments in private equity funds targeting financial services companies such as financial institutions and insurance services around the world.

Real estate
Real estate consists of investments in private equity funds targeting global distress opportunities, value added U.S. properties, and global mezzanine debt securities in the commercial real estate market.

Distressed
Distressed consists of investments in private equity funds targeting distressed debt/credit and equity opportunities in the U.S.

Mezzanine
Mezzanine consists of investments in private equity funds targeting private mezzanine debt of large-cap and mid-cap companies in the U.S. and worldwide.

Traditional
Traditional consists of investments in private equity funds employing traditional private equity investment strategies such as buyout and venture with different geographical focuses including Brazil, Asia, Europe, and the U.S.

Vintage
Vintage consists of investments in private equity funds made before 2002 and where the funds’ commitment periods had already expired.



F-32


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Investment funds
ACE’s investment funds employ various investment strategies such as long/short equity and arbitrage/distressed. Included in this category are investments for which ACE has the option to redeem at agreed upon value as described in each investment fund’s subscription agreement. Depending on the terms of the various subscription agreements, investment fund investments may be redeemed monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, or annually. If ACE wishes to redeem an investment fund investment, it must first determine if the investment fund is still in a lock-up period (a time when ACE cannot redeem its investment so that the investment fund manager has time to build the portfolio). If the investment fund is no longer in its lock-up period, ACE must then notify the investment fund manager of its intention to redeem by the notification date prescribed by the subscription agreement. Subsequent to notification, the investment fund can redeem ACE’s investment within several months of the notification. Notice periods for redemption of the investment funds range between 5 and 120 days. ACE can redeem its investment funds without consent from the investment fund managers.

Level 3 financial instruments
The fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) consist of various inputs and assumptions that management makes when determining fair value. Management analyzes changes in fair value measurements classified within Level 3 by comparing pricing and returns of our investments to benchmarks, including month-over-month movements, investment credit spreads, interest rate movements, and credit quality of securities.
The following table presents the significant unobservable inputs used in the Level 3 liability valuations. Excluded from the table below are inputs used to fair value Level 3 assets which are based on single broker quotes or net asset value and contain no quantitative unobservable inputs developed by management.
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Fair Value at
December 31, 2012

 
Valuation
Technique
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
 
Ranges
GLB (1)
$
1,119

 
Actuarial model
 
Lapse rate
 
1% - 30%
 
 
 
 
 
Annuitization rate
 
0% - 50%
(1)  
Discussion of the most significant inputs used in the fair value measurement of GLB and the sensitivity of those assumptions is included within Note 4 a) Guaranteed living benefits.



F-33


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of financial instruments measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3): 
 
Assets
 
 
Liabilities

 
Available-for-Sale Debt Securities
 
 
Equity
securities

 
Other
investments

 
Other
derivative
instruments

 
GLB (1)

Year Ended December 31, 2012
U.S.
Treasury
and
agency

 
Foreign

 
Corporate
securities

 
MBS

 
States,
municipalities,
and political
subdivisions

 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
Balance-Beginning of year
$
5

 
$
33

 
$
134

 
$
28

 
$
1

 
$
13

 
$
1,877

 
$
3

 
$
1,319

Transfers into Level 3

 
49

 
37

 
22

 
1

 
2

 
53

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
(4
)
 
(13
)
 
(46
)
 
(35
)
 
(1
)
 
(11
)
 

 

 

Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) included in OCI

 
(1
)
 
6

 

 

 

 
55

 

 

Net Realized Gains/Losses

 

 
(1
)
 

 

 

 
(7
)
 
(4
)
 
(200
)
Purchases

 
46

 
24

 
9

 

 
4

 
520

 
3

 

Sales

 
(53
)
 
(19
)
 
(7
)
 

 
(5
)
 
(9
)
 

 

Settlements
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(33
)
 
(4
)
 
(1
)
 

 
(237
)
 
(2
)
 

Balance-End of Year
$

 
$
60

 
$
102

 
$
13

 
$

 
$
3

 
$
2,252

 
$

 
$
1,119

Net Realized Gains/Losses Attributable to Changes in Fair Value at the Balance Sheet Date
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(7
)
 
$

 
$
(200
)
(1)  
Our GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative instrument for accounting purposes and is accordingly carried at fair value. Excluded from the table above is the portion of the GLB derivative liability classified as Future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 5 c ) for additional information.
 
Assets
 
 
Liabilities

 
Available-for-Sale Debt Securities
 
 
Equity
securities

 
Other
investments

 
Other
derivative
instruments

 
GLB (1)

Year Ended December 31, 2011
U.S.
Treasury
and
Agency

 
Foreign

 
Corporate
securities

 
MBS

 
States,
municipalities,
and political
subdivisions

 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance-Beginning of year
$

 
$
26

 
$
115

 
$
39

 
$
2

 
$
13

 
$
1,432

 
$
4

 
$
507

Transfers into Level 3

 
9

 
42

 
4

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3

 
(18
)
 
(4
)
 
(48
)
 

 

 

 

 

Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) included in OCI

 
(1
)
 
(2
)
 

 

 
(1
)
 
93

 

 

Net Realized Gains/Losses

 

 
(3
)
 

 

 
4

 
(3
)
 
2

 
812

Purchases
5

 
23

 
32

 
59

 

 
5

 
602

 

 

Sales

 
(3
)
 
(27
)
 
(17
)
 

 
(8
)
 
(55
)
 

 

Settlements

 
(3
)
 
(19
)
 
(9
)
 
(1
)
 

 
(192
)
 
(3
)
 

Balance-End of Year
$
5

 
$
33

 
$
134

 
$
28

 
$
1

 
$
13

 
$
1,877

 
$
3

 
$
1,319

Net Realized Gains/Losses Attributable to Changes in Fair Value at the Balance Sheet Date
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(3
)
 
$
(1
)
 
$
812

(1)  
Our GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative instrument for accounting purposes and is accordingly carried at fair value. Excluded from the table above is the portion of the GLB derivative liability classified as Future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. The liability for GLB reinsurance was $ 1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 and $ 648 million at December 31, 2010 , which includes a fair value derivative adjustment of $ 1.3 billion and $ 507 million, respectively. 


F-34


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



 
Assets
 
 
Liabilities

 
Available-for-Sale Debt Securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GLB (1)

Year Ended December 31, 2010
Foreign

 
Corporate
securities

 
MBS

 
States,
municipalities,
and political
subdivisions

 
Equity
securities

Other
investments

Other
derivative
instruments

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance-Beginning of year
$
59

 
$
168

 
$
21

 
$
3

 
$
12

 
$
1,149

 
$
14

 
$
443

Transfers into (Out of) Level 3
(14
)
 
(25
)
 
(1
)
 

 
1

 

 

 

Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) included in OCI
1

 
9

 

 

 

 
53

 

 

Net Realized Gains/Losses
1

 
(3
)
 

 

 
1

 
(7
)
 
2

 
64

Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net
(21
)
 
(34
)
 
19

 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
237

 
(12
)
 

Balance-End of Year
$
26

 
$
115

 
$
39

 
$
2

 
$
13

 
$
1,432

 
$
4

 
$
507

Net Realized Gains/Losses Attributable to Changes in Fair Value at the Balance Sheet Date
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(7
)
 
$
1

 
$
64

(1)  
Our GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative instrument for accounting purposes and is accordingly carried at fair value. Excluded from the table above is the portion of the GLB derivative liability classified as Future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. The liability for GLB reinsurance was $ 648 million at December 31, 2010 and $ 559 million at December 31, 2009, which includes a fair value derivative adjustment of $ 507 million and $ 443 million, respectively. 

b) Financial instruments disclosed, but not measured, at fair value
ACE uses various financial instruments in the normal course of its business. Our insurance contracts are excluded from fair value of financial instruments accounting guidance, and therefore, are not included in the amounts discussed below.
The carrying values of cash, other assets, other liabilities, and other financial instruments not included below approximated their fair values.

Investments in partially-owned insurance companies
Fair values for investments in partially-owned insurance companies are based on ACE’s share of the net assets based on the financial statements provided by those companies.

Short- and long-term debt and trust preferred securities
Where practical, fair values for short-term debt, long-term debt, and trust preferred securities are estimated using discounted cash flow calculations based principally on observable inputs including incremental borrowing rates, which reflect ACE’s credit rating, for similar types of borrowings with maturities consistent with those remaining for the debt being valued.



F-35


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following table presents carrying values and fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value:
 
December 31
 
 
December 31
 
 
2012
 
 
2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Carrying Value

 
Fair Value

 
Carrying Value

 
Fair Value

Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities held to maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
1,044

 
$
1,083

 
$
1,078

 
$
1,126

Foreign
910

 
964

 
935

 
930

Corporate securities
2,133

 
2,275

 
2,338

 
2,337

Mortgage-backed securities
2,028

 
2,116

 
2,949

 
3,036

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
1,155

 
1,195

 
1,147

 
1,176


7,270

 
7,633

 
8,447

 
8,605

Partially-owned insurance companies
454

 
454

 
352

 
352

Total assets
$
7,724

 
$
8,087

 
$
8,799

 
$
8,957

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term debt
$
1,401

 
$
1,401

 
$
1,251

 
$
1,251

Long-term debt
3,360

 
3,916

 
3,360

 
3,823

Trust preferred securities
309

 
446

 
309

 
404

Total liabilities
$
5,070

 
$
5,763

 
$
4,920

 
$
5,478

 
The following table presents, by valuation hierarchy, the financial instruments not measured at fair value: 
 
December 31, 2012
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

 
Total

Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities held to maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
619

 
$
464

 
$

 
$
1,083

Foreign

 
964

 

 
964

Corporate securities

 
2,257

 
18

 
2,275

Mortgage-backed securities

 
2,116

 

 
2,116

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 
1,195

 

 
1,195

 
619

 
6,996

 
18

 
7,633

Partially-owned insurance companies

 

 
454

 
454

Total assets
$
619

 
$
6,996

 
$
472

 
$
8,087

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term debt
$

 
$
1,401

 
$

 
$
1,401

Long-term debt

 
3,916

 

 
3,916

Trust preferred securities

 
446

 

 
446

Total liabilities
$

 
$
5,763

 
$

 
$
5,763




F-36


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


5 . Reinsurance

a) Consolidated reinsurance
ACE purchases reinsurance to manage various exposures including catastrophe risks. Although reinsurance agreements contractually obligate ACE's reinsurers to reimburse it for the agreed-upon portion of its gross paid losses, they do not discharge ACE's primary liability. The amounts for net premiums written and net premiums earned in the consolidated statements of operations are net of reinsurance. The following table presents direct, assumed, and ceded premiums:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
2010
 
Premiums written
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct
$
18,144

 
$
17,626

 
$
15,887

Assumed
 
3,449

 
 
3,205

 
 
3,624

Ceded
 
(5,518
)
 
 
(5,459
)
 
 
(5,803
)
Net
$
16,075

 
$
15,372

 
$
13,708

Premiums earned
 
 
 
 

 
 

Direct
$
17,802

 
$
17,534

 
$
15,780

Assumed
 
3,302

 
 
3,349

 
 
3,516

Ceded
 
(5,427
)
 
 
(5,496
)
 
 
(5,792
)
Net
$
15,677

 
$
15,387

 
$
13,504


For the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , reinsurance recoveries on losses and loss expenses incurred were $ 4.3 billion, $ 3.3 billion, and $ 3.3 billion, respectively.

b) Reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance
The following table presents the composition of reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses:
 
 
December 31
 
 
December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012
 
 
2011
 
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses (1)

$
11,399

 

$
11,602

Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses and loss expenses (1)
 
679

 
 
787

Net reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses

$
12,078

 

$
12,389

(1)  
Net of a provision for uncollectible reinsurance.

We evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and potential reinsurers on a regular basis and also monitor concentrations of credit risk with reinsurers. The provision for uncollectible reinsurance is required principally due to the potential failure of reinsurers to indemnify ACE, primarily because of disputes under reinsurance contracts and insolvencies. We have established provisions for amounts estimated to be uncollectible. At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , we recorded a provision for uncollectible reinsurance of $ 439 million and $ 479 million, respectively.

The following tables present a listing, at December 31, 2012 , of the categories of ACE's reinsurers. The first category, largest reinsurers, represents all groups of reinsurers where the gross recoverable exceeds one percent of ACE's total shareholders' equity. The provision for uncollectible reinsurance for the largest reinsurers, other reinsurers rated A- or better, and other reinsurers with ratings lower than A- is principally based on an analysis of the credit quality of the reinsurer and collateral balances. Other pools and government agencies include amounts backed by certain state and federal agencies. In certain states, insurance companies are required by law to participate in these pools. Structured settlements include annuities purchased from life insurance companies to settle claims. Since we retain the ultimate liability in the event that the life company fails to pay, we reflect the amount as a liability and a recoverable/receivable for GAAP purposes. Captives include companies established and owned by our insurance clients to assume a significant portion of their direct insurance risk from ACE (they are structured to allow clients to self-insure a portion of their insurance risk). It is generally our policy to obtain collateral equal to expected losses. Where appropriate, exceptions are granted but only with review and approval at a senior officer level. The final category, Other, includes amounts recoverable that are in dispute or are from companies that are in supervision, rehabilitation, or liquidation. We establish the provision for uncollectible reinsurance in this category based on a



F-37


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


case by case analysis of individual situations including the merits of the underlying matter, credit and collateral analysis, and consideration of our collection experience in similar situations.

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages)
2012
 
 
Provision
 
 
% of Gross

Categories
 
Largest reinsurers

$
5,800

 

$
98

 
1.7
%
Other reinsurers balances rated A- or better
 
3,080

 
 
40

 
1.3
%
Other reinsurers balances with ratings lower than A- or not rated
 
602

 
 
120

 
19.9
%
Other pools and government agencies
 
383

 
 
14

 
3.7
%
Structured settlements
 
582

 
 
24

 
4.1
%
Captives
 
1,761

 
 
14

 
0.8
%
Other
 
309

 
 
129

 
41.7
%
Total

$
12,517

 

$
439

 
3.5
%

Largest Reinsurers
 
 
 
Berkshire Hathaway Insurance Group
Lloyd's of London
Swiss Re Group
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Munich Re Group
Transatlantic Holdings
HDI Re Group (Hanover Re)
Partner Re
XL Capital Group


 

c ) Assumed life reinsurance programs involving minimum benefit guarantees under annuity contracts
The following table presents income and expenses relating to GMDB and GLB reinsurance. GLBs include GMIBs as well as some GMABs originating in Japan.
 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

GMDB
 
 
 
 
 
Net premiums earned
$
85

 
$
98

 
$
109

Policy benefits and other reserve adjustments
$
60

 
$
59

 
$
99

GLB
 
 
 
 
 
Net premiums earned
$
160

 
$
163

 
$
164

Policy benefits and other reserve adjustments
61

 
47

 
29

Net realized gains (losses)
203

 
(812
)
 
(64
)
Gain (loss) recognized in income
$
302

 
$
(696
)
 
$
71

Net cash received
$
149

 
$
161

 
$
160

Net (increase) decrease in liability
$
153

 
$
(857
)
 
$
(89
)
At December 31, 2012 , reported liabilities for GMDB and GLB reinsurance were $90 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, compared with $138 million and $1.5 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2011 . The reported liability for GLB reinsurance of $1.4 billion at December 31, 2012 , and $ 1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 , includes a fair value derivative adjustment of $1.1 billion and $ 1.3 billion, respectively. Included in Net realized gains (losses) in the table above are gains (losses) related to foreign exchange and other fair value derivative adjustments. Reported liabilities for both GMDB and GLB reinsurance are determined using internal valuation models. Such valuations require considerable judgment and are subject to significant uncertainty. The valuation of these products is subject to fluctuations arising from, among other factors, changes in interest rates, changes in equity markets, changes in credit markets, changes in the allocation of the investments underlying annuitants’ account values, and assumptions regarding future policyholder behavior. These models and the related assumptions are continually reviewed by management and enhanced, as appropriate, based upon improvements in modeling assumptions and availability of more information, such as market conditions and demographics of in-force annuities.


F-38


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Variable Annuity Net Amount at Risk
(i) Reinsurance covering the GMDB risk only
At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , the net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering the GMDB risk only was $1.3 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively.
For reinsurance programs covering the GMDB risk only, the net amount at risk is defined as the present value of future claim payments under the following assumptions:
policy account values and guaranteed values are fixed at the valuation date ( December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively);
there are no lapses or withdrawals;
mortality according to 100 percent of the Annuity 2000 mortality table;
future claims are discounted in line with the discounting assumption used in the calculation of the benefit reserve averaging between 1.0 percent and 2.0 percent ; and
reinsurance coverage ends at the earlier of the maturity of the underlying variable annuity policy or the reinsurance treaty.
The total claim amount payable on reinsurance programs covering the GMDB risk only, if all the cedants’ policyholders were to die immediately at December 31, 2012 was approximately $495 million. This takes into account all applicable reinsurance treaty claim limits.
(ii) Reinsurance covering the GLB risk only
At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , the net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering the GLB risk only was $445 million and $380 million, respectively.
For reinsurance programs covering the GLB risk only, the net amount at risk is defined as the present value of future claim payments under the following assumptions:
policy account values and guaranteed values are fixed at the valuation date ( December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively);
there are no deaths, lapses, or withdrawals;
policyholders annuitize at a frequency most disadvantageous to ACE (in other words, annuitization at a level that maximizes claims taking into account the treaty limits) under the terms of the reinsurance contracts;
for annuitizing policyholders, the GMIB claim is calculated using interest rates in line with those used in calculating the reserve;
future claims are discounted in line with the discounting assumption used in the calculation of the benefit reserve averaging between 3.5 percent and 4.5 percent; and
reinsurance coverage ends at the earlier of the maturity of the underlying variable annuity policy or the reinsurance treaty. 
(iii) Reinsurance covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders
At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , the GMDB net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders was $116 million and $182 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , the GLB net amount at risk from reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders was $655 million and $998 million, respectively.
These net amounts at risk reflect the interaction between the two types of benefits on any single policyholder (eliminating double-counting), and therefore the net amounts at risk should be considered additive.
For reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders, the net amount at risk is defined as the present value of future claim payments under the following assumptions:
policy account values and guaranteed values are fixed at the valuation date ( December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively);
there are no lapses, or withdrawals;
mortality according to 100 percent of the Annuity 2000 mortality table;



F-39


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


policyholders annuitize at a frequency most disadvantageous to ACE (in other words, annuitization at a level that maximizes claims taking into account the treaty limits) under the terms of the reinsurance contracts;
for annuitizing policyholders, the GMIB claim is calculated using interest rates in line with those used in calculating the reserve;
future claims are discounted in line with the discounting assumption used in the calculation of the benefit reserve averaging between 1.5 percent and 2.5 percent; and
reinsurance coverage ends at the earlier of the maturity of the underlying variable annuity policy or the reinsurance treaty.
The total claim amount payable on reinsurance programs covering both the GMDB and GLB risks on the same underlying policyholders, if all of the cedants’ policyholders were to die immediately at December 31, 2012 was approximately $640 million. This takes into account all applicable reinsurance treaty claim limits. Although there would be an increase in death claims resulting from 100 percent immediate mortality of all policyholders, the GLB claims would be zero.
The average attained age of all policyholders under sections i), ii), and iii) above, weighted by the guaranteed value of each reinsured policy, is approximately 68 years.

6 . Intangible assets

Included in Goodwill and other intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , are goodwill of $ 4.3 billion and $ 4.1 billion, respectively, and other intangible assets of $ 656 million and $ 651 million, respectively.

The following table presents a roll-forward of Goodwill by business segment:
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Insurance – North American

 
Insurance – Overseas General

 
Global Reinsurance

 
Life

 
ACE Consolidated

Balance at December 31, 2010
$
1,351

 
$
1,564

 
$
365

 
$
750

 
$
4,030

Purchase price allocation adjustment
(12
)
 
5

 

 

 
(7
)
Acquisition of New York Life's Korea operations and Hong Kong operations

 

 

 
89

 
89

Acquisition of PMHC
11

 

 

 

 
11

Acquisition of Rio Guayas

 
31

 

 

 
31

Foreign exchange revaluation and other

 
3

 

 
(9
)
 
(6
)
Balance at December 31, 2011
$
1,350

 
$
1,603

 
$
365

 
$
830

 
$
4,148

Purchase price allocation adjustment

 

 

 
4

 
4

Acquisition of JaPro

 
123

 

 

 
123

Foreign exchange revaluation and other
3

 
38

 

 
3

 
44

Balance at December 31, 2012
$
1,353


$
1,764

 
$
365

 
$
837

 
$
4,319


Included in the other intangible assets balance at December 31, 2012 , are intangible assets subject to amortization of $ 554 million and intangible assets not subject to amortization of $ 102 million. Intangible assets subject to amortization include agency relationships, software, client lists, renewal rights, and trademarks, primarily attributable to the acquisitions of Rain and Hail and Combined Insurance. The majority of the balance of intangible assets not subject to amortization relates to Lloyd's of London (Lloyd's) Syndicate 2488 (Syndicate 2488) capacity. Amortization expense related to other intangible assets amounted to $ 51 million, $ 29 million, and $ 9 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively.



F-40


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following table presents a roll-forward of VOBA:
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Balance, beginning of year
$
676

 
$
634

 
$
748

Acquisition of New York Life's Korea operations and Hong Kong operations

 
151

 

Amortization expense
(82
)
 
(108
)
 
(111
)
Foreign exchange revaluation
20

 
(1
)
 
(3
)
Balance, end of year
$
614

 
$
676

 
$
634


The following table presents the estimated amortization expense related to other intangible assets and VOBA for the next five years:
For the Year Ending December 31
Other intangible assets

 
VOBA

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
2013
$
49

 
$
67

2014
45

 
58

2015
40

 
51

2016
35

 
45

2017
33

 
42

Total
$
202

 
$
263


7 . Unpaid losses and loss expenses

ACE establishes reserves for the estimated unpaid ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of its policies and agreements. These reserves include estimates for both claims that have been reported and for IBNR, and include estimates of expenses associated with processing and settling these claims. These reserves are recorded in Unpaid losses and loss expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. The process of establishing loss and loss expense reserves for P&C claims can be complex and is subject to considerable uncertainty as it requires the use of informed estimates and judgments. Our estimates and judgments may be revised as additional experience and other data become available and are reviewed, as new or improved methodologies are developed, or as laws change. We continually evaluate our estimate of reserves in light of developing information and in light of discussions and negotiations with our insureds. While we believe that our reserves for unpaid losses and loss expenses at December 31, 2012 are adequate, new information or trends may lead to future developments in ultimate losses and loss expenses significantly greater or less than the reserves provided. Any such revisions could result in future changes in estimates of losses or reinsurance recoverable and would be reflected in our results of operations in the period in which the estimates are changed.



F-41


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



The following table presents a reconciliation of unpaid losses and loss expenses:

 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
2010
 
Gross unpaid losses and loss expenses, beginning of year
 
$
37,477

 

$
37,391

 

$
37,783

Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses (1)
 
(11,602
)
 
 
(12,149
)
 
 
(12,745
)
Net unpaid losses and loss expenses, beginning of year
 
25,875

 
 
25,242

 
 
25,038

Acquisition of subsidiaries
 
14

 
 
92

 
 
145

Total
 
25,889

 
 
25,334

 
 
25,183

Net losses and loss expenses incurred in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current year
 
10,132

 
 
10,076

 
 
8,082

Prior years
 
(479
)
 
 
(556
)
 
 
(503
)
Total
 
9,653

 
 
9,520

 
 
7,579

Net losses and loss expenses paid in respect of losses occurring in:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current year
 
4,325

 
 
4,209

 
 
2,689

Prior years
 
4,894

 
 
4,657

 
 
4,724

Total
 
9,219

 
 
8,866

 
 
7,413

Foreign currency revaluation and other
 
224

 
 
(113
)
 
 
(107
)
Net unpaid losses and loss expenses, end of year
 
26,547

 
 
25,875

 
 
25,242

Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses (1)
 
11,399

 
 
11,602

 
 
12,149

Gross unpaid losses and loss expenses, end of year
 
$
37,946

 
 
$
37,477

 
 
$
37,391

(1)  Net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Net losses and loss expenses incurred includes $ 479 million, $ 556 million, and $ 503 million, of net favorable prior period development in the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively. The following is a summary of prior period development for the periods indicated. The remaining net development for long-tail and short-tail business for each segment comprises numerous favorable and adverse movements across lines and accident years.

Insurance – North American
Insurance – North American's active operations experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 360 million in 2012 , representing 2.2 percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2011 . Net prior period development was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements. Net favorable development of $ 245 million on long-tail business included favorable development of $ 73 million on umbrella and excess casualty business primarily affecting the 2007 and prior accident years; $ 67 million in the directors and officers (D&O) portfolio affecting the 2007 and prior accident years; $ 57 million on medical risk operations primarily affecting the 2007 and prior accident years; and $ 39 million on the national accounts portfolios (commercial auto liability, general liability, and workers' compensation lines of business). Net prior period development also included favorable development of $ 9 million across a number of lines and accident years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate. Favorable development of $ 115 million on short-tail business included favorable development of $ 88 million in the property, inland marine and commercial marine portfolios primarily arising on the 2009 through 2011 accident years and favorable development of $ 27 million on aviation product lines affecting the 2009 and prior accident years.

Insurance – North American's run-off operations incurred net adverse prior period development of $ 168 million in the Westchester and Brandywine run-off operations during 2012 , which was the net result of adverse movements impacting accident years 2001 and prior, representing one percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2011 . Net adverse prior period development was driven by adverse development of $ 150 million related to the completion of the reserve review during 2012 and $ 18 million of unallocated loss adjustment expenses due to run-off operating expenses reserved and paid during 2012.



F-42


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Insurance – North American's active operations experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 297 million in 2011 , representing 1.9 percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2010 . Net prior period development was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements. Net favorable development of $ 186 million on long-tail business included favorable development of $ 82 million in the D&O portfolio affecting the 2006 and prior accident years; $ 54 million in the excess casualty business affecting the 2005 and prior accident years; $ 43 million on medical risk operations; $ 28 million on the national accounts portfolio (commercial auto liability, general liability, and workers' compensation lines of business); and $ 26 million within the financial solutions business relating to a single account on the 2002 through 2010 accident years. Additional favorable development included $ 26 million in the foreign casualty product affecting the 2007 and prior accident years and $ 21 million on surety business primarily impacting the 2009 year. Partially offsetting this favorable development was adverse development of $ 40 million on errors and omissions coverage primarily affecting the 2007 and 2008 accident years and adverse development of $ 29 million within the environmental liability product line concentrated in the 2005 through 2007 accident years. Net prior period development also included adverse development of $ 25 million on other lines across a number of accident years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate. Net favorable development of $ 111 million on short-tail business included favorable development of $ 48 million in the property portfolios primarily affecting the 2009 and 2010 accident years and favorable development of $ 63 million on other lines across a number of accident years, primarily following better than expected loss emergence.

Insurance – North American's run-off operations incurred net adverse prior period development of $ 102 million in the Westchester and Brandywine run-off operations during 2011 , which was the net result of adverse movements impacting the accident years 2000 and prior, representing 0.6 percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2010 . Net adverse prior period development was driven by adverse development of $ 82 million related to the completion of the reserve review during 2011 and $ 17 million of unallocated loss adjustment expenses due to operating expenses reserved and paid during 2011. Net prior period development also included $ 3 million of adverse development on other lines across a number of accident years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate.

Insurance – North American experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 107 million in 2010 , representing 0.7 percent of the segment's net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2009.

Insurance – Overseas General
Insurance – Overseas General experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 226 million in 2012 representing 3.1 percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2011 . Net prior period development was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements. Net favorable development of $ 121 million on long-tail business included favorable development of $ 150 million in casualty (primary and excess) and financial lines for accident years 2008 and prior, and adverse development of $ 29 million in the casualty (mainly primary) and financial lines for accident years 2009 through 2011 . Favorable development of $ 105 million on short-tail business included property, marine, A&H, and personal lines across multiple geographical regions, and within both retail and wholesale operations, principally as a result of lower than expected loss emergence, mostly on accident years 2009 and 2010 .

Insurance – Overseas General experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 290 million in 2011 representing 4.2 percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2010 . Net prior period development was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements. Net favorable development of $ 154 million on long-tail business included favorable development of $ 337 million in casualty (primary and excess) and financial lines for accident years 2007 and prior, and adverse development of $ 183 million in the casualty (primary and excess) and financial lines book for accident years 2008 through 2010 . Net favorable development of $ 136 million on short-tail business included property, marine, A&H, and energy lines across multiple geographical regions, and within both retail and wholesale operations, principally on accident years 2008 and 2009 .

Insurance – Overseas General experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 290 million in 2010 , representing 4.3 percent of the segment's net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2009.

Global Reinsurance
Global Reinsurance experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 61 million in 2012 representing 2.7 percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2011 . Net prior period development was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements. Net favorable development of $ 32 million on long-tail business included favorable development of $ 54 million principally in treaty years 2008 and prior in casualty and medical malpractice lines. Net adverse development of $ 18 million on non-medical professional liability composed of favorable development on treaty years 2005 and prior, offset by adverse development on treaty years 2006 through 2011. Net prior period development also included $ 4 million of adverse



F-43


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


development across a number of lines and treaty years, none of which was significant individually or in the aggregate. Net favorable development of $ 29 million on short-tail business, principally in treaty years 2010 and prior across property lines (including property catastrophe), trade credit, marine, and surety.

Global Reinsurance experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 71 million in 2011 representing 3.1 percent of net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2010 . Net prior period development was the net result of several underlying favorable and adverse movements. Net favorable development of $ 58 million on long-tail business included net favorable development of $ 79 million principally in treaty years 2007 and prior across a number of portfolios (professional liability, D&O, casualty, and medical malpractice). Net favorable development of $ 13 million on short-tail business, primarily in treaty years 2009 and prior across property lines (including property catastrophe), trade credit, and surety.

Global Reinsurance experienced net favorable prior period development of $ 106 million in 2010 , representing 4.7 percent of the segment's net unpaid reserves at December 31, 2009.

Asbestos and environmental (A&E) and other run-off liabilities
Included in liabilities for losses and loss expenses are amounts for A&E (A&E liabilities). The A&E liabilities principally relate to claims arising from bodily-injury claims related to asbestos products and remediation costs associated with hazardous waste sites. The estimation of A&E liabilities is particularly sensitive to future changes in the legal, social, and economic environment. ACE has not assumed any such future changes in setting the value of its A&E reserves, which include provisions for both reported and IBNR claims.

ACE's exposure to A&E claims principally arises out of liabilities acquired when it purchased Westchester Specialty in 1998 and CIGNA's P&C business in 1999 , with the larger exposure contained within the liabilities acquired in the CIGNA transaction. In 1996 , prior to ACE's acquisition of CIGNA's P&C business, the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner approved a plan to restructure INA Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Restructuring) which included the division of Insurance Company of North America (INA) into two separate corporations:

(1) An active insurance company that retained the INA name and continued to write P&C business; and
(2) An inactive run-off company, now called Century Indemnity Company (Century).

As a result of the division, predominantly all A&E and certain other liabilities of INA were ascribed to Century and extinguished, as a matter of Pennsylvania law, as liabilities of INA.

As part of the Restructuring, most A&E liabilities of various U.S. affiliates of INA were reinsured to Century. Century and certain other run-off companies having A&E and other liabilities were contributed to Brandywine Holdings. ACE acquired Brandywine Holdings and its various subsidiaries as part of the 1999 acquisition of CIGNA's P&C business. For additional information, refer to “Brandywine Run-Off Entities” below.

During 2012 , we conducted our annual internal, ground-up review of our consolidated A&E liabilities as of December 31, 2011 . As a result of the internal review, we increased our gross loss reserves in 2012 for the Brandywine operations, including A&E, by $ 275 million, while the net loss reserves increased by $ 146 million. In addition, we increased gross loss reserves for Westchester Specialty's A&E and other liabilities by $ 17 million, while the net loss reserves increased by $ 4 million.

In 2012, in addition to our annual internal review, a team of external actuaries performed an evaluation as to the adequacy of Century's reserves. This external review was conducted in accordance with the Brandywine Restructuring Order, which requires that an independent actuarial review of Century's reserves be completed every two years. Management takes full responsibility for the estimation of its A&E liabilities.

An internal review was also conducted during 2011 of consolidated A&E liabilities as of December 31, 2010 . As a result of that internal review, we increased gross loss reserves in 2011 for the Brandywine operations, including A&E, by $ 241 million while the net loss reserves increased by $ 76 million. In addition, we decreased gross loss reserves for Westchester Specialty's A&E and other liabilities by $ 29 million, while the net loss reserves increased by $ 6 million.

ACE's A&E reserves are not discounted for GAAP reporting and do not reflect any anticipated future changes in the legal, social, or economic environment, or any benefit from future legislative reforms.


F-44


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



The table below presents a roll-forward of consolidated A&E loss reserves (excluding other run-off liabilities), allocated loss expense reserves for A&E exposures, and the provision for uncollectible paid and unpaid reinsurance recoverables:
 
Asbestos
 
Environmental
 
Total
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Gross
 
 
Net
 
 
Gross
 
 
Net
 
 
Gross
 
 
Net
 
Balance at December 31, 2011 (1)
 
$
2,086

 
 
$
1,142

 
 
$
245

 
 
$
162

 
 
$
2,331

 
 
$
1,304

Incurred activity
 
211

 
 
95

 
 
40

 
 
39

 
 
251

 
 
134

Paid activity
 
(440
)
 
 
(275
)
 
 
(78
)
 
 
(61
)
 
 
(518
)
 
 
(336
)
Balance at December 31, 2012
 
$
1,857

 
 
$
962

 
 
$
207

 
 
$
140

 
 
$
2,064

 
 
$
1,102

(1)  
Balances at December 31, 2011 have been adjusted to present claims in a manner consistent with balances disclosed at December 31, 2012.

The A&E net loss reserves including allocated loss expense reserves and provision for uncollectible reinsurance at December 31, 2012 , of $ 1.1 billion shown in the table above comprise $ 852 million in reserves in respect of Brandywine operations, $ 151 million of reserves held by Westchester Specialty, $ 84 million of reserves held by Insurance – Overseas General, $ 12 million of reserves held by ACE Bermuda, and $ 3 million of reserves held by Penn Millers. The incurred activity of $ 134 million is primarily the result of adverse activity in Brandywine and Westchester of $ 110 million and $ 22 million, respectively.

The net figures in the above table reflect third-party reinsurance other than reinsurance provided by National Indemnity Company (NICO) under two aggregate excess of loss contracts described below (collectively, the NICO contracts).  ACE excludes the NICO contracts as they cover non-A&E liabilities as well as A&E liabilities.  The split of coverage provided under the NICO contracts for A&E liabilities as compared to non-A&E liabilities is entirely dependent on the timing of the payment of the related claims. ACE's ability to make an estimate of this split is not practicable. ACE believes, instead, that the A&E discussion is best provided excluding the NICO contracts, while separately discussing the NICO contracts in relation to the total subject business, both A&E and non-A&E, covered by those contracts.  With certain exceptions, the NICO contracts provide coverage for the net A&E incurred losses and allocated loss expenses within the limits of coverage and above ACE's retention levels.  These exceptions include losses arising from certain operations of Insurance – Overseas General and participation by ACE Bermuda as a co-reinsurer or retrocessionaire in the NICO contracts.

Brandywine run-off - impact of NICO contracts on ACE's run-off liabilities
As part of the acquisition of CIGNA's P&C business, NICO provided $ 2.5 billion of reinsurance protection to Century on all Brandywine loss and allocated loss adjustment expense reserves and on the A&E reserves of various ACE INA insurance subsidiaries reinsured by Century (in each case, including uncollectible reinsurance). The benefits of this NICO contract (the Brandywine NICO Agreement) flowed to the other Brandywine companies and to the ACE INA insurance subsidiaries through agreements between those companies and Century. The Brandywine NICO Agreement was exhausted on an incurred basis in 2002 .

The following table presents a roll-forward of net loss reserves, allocated loss expense reserves, and provision for uncollectible paid and unpaid reinsurance recoverables in respect of Brandywine operations only, including the impact of the Brandywine NICO Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2012 :
 
Brandywine
 
NICO Coverage
 
 
Net of NICO Coverage

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
A&E
 
 
Other
 
(1)  
Total
 
 
(2)  
Balance at December 31, 2011 (3)
 
$
1,032

 
 
$
458

 
 
$
1,490

 
 
$
386

 
$
1,104

Incurred activity
 
110

 
 
19

 
 
129

 
 

 
129

Paid activity
 
(290
)
 
 
(56
)
 
 
(346
)
 
 
(368
)
 
22

Balance at December 31, 2012
 
$
852

 
 
$
421

 
 
$
1,273

 
 
$
18

 
$
1,255

(1)  
Other consists primarily of workers' compensation, non-A&E general liability losses, and provision for uncollectible reinsurance on non-A&E business.
(2)  
NICO Coverage at December 31, 2011 was reduced to reflect $238 million of advances from NICO on uncollected inuring reinsurance recoverables as payments reducing the limit.
(3)  
Balances at December 31, 2011 have been adjusted to present claims in a manner consistent with balances disclosed at December 31, 2012.

The incurred activity of $ 129 million primarily relates to the internal review of consolidated A&E liabilities as discussed above.




F-45


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Westchester Specialty - impact of NICO contracts on ACE's run-off liabilities
As part of the Westchester Specialty acquisition in 1998, NICO provided a 75 percent pro-rata share of $ 1 billion of reinsurance protection on losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred on or before December 31, 1996, in excess of a retention of $ 721 million (the 1998 NICO Agreement). NICO has also provided an 85 percent pro-rata share of $ 150 million of reinsurance protection on losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses incurred on or before December 31, 1992 , in excess of a retention of $ 755 million (the 1992 NICO Agreement). At December 31, 2012 , the remaining unused incurred limit under the 1998 NICO Agreement was $ 492 million, which is only available for losses and loss adjustment expenses. The 1992 NICO Agreement was exhausted on a paid basis in 2009 .

The following table presents a roll-forward of net loss reserves, allocated loss expense reserves, and provision for uncollectible paid and unpaid reinsurance recoverables in respect of 1996 and prior Westchester Specialty operations that are the subject business of the NICO covers for the year ended December 31, 2012 :
 
Westchester Specialty
 
NICO Coverage
 
 
Net of NICO Coverage
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
A&E
 
 
Other
 
 
Total
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2011 (1)

$
144

 

$
54

 

$
198

 

$
165

 

$
33

Incurred activity
 
22

 
 
(6
)
 
 
16

 
 
12

 
 
4

Paid activity
 
(15)

 
 
(4)

 
 
(19)

 
 
(19)

 
 

Balance at December 31, 2012

$
151

 

$
44

 

$
195

 

$
158

 
 
$
37

(1)  
Balances at December 31, 2011 have been adjusted to present claims in a manner consistent with balances disclosed at December 31, 2012.

The incurred activity of $ 4 million primarily relates to the internal review of consolidated A&E liabilities as discussed above.

Brandywine run-off entities
In addition to housing a significant portion of ACE's A&E exposure, the Brandywine operations include run-off liabilities related to various insurance and reinsurance businesses. ACE's Brandywine insurance companies are Century (a Pennsylvania insurer) and Century International Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda insurer (CIRC).  The Brandywine companies are direct or indirect subsidiaries of Brandywine Holdings.

The U.S.-based ACE INA companies assumed two contractual obligations in respect of the Brandywine operations in connection with the Restructuring: a dividend retention fund obligation and a surplus maintenance obligation in the form of the excess of loss (XOL) agreement.

INA Financial Corporation established and funded a dividend retention fund (the Dividend Retention Fund) consisting of $ 50  million plus investment earnings. Pursuant to an interpretation of the Brandywine Restructuring Order, the full balance of the Dividend Retention Fund was contributed to Century as of December 31, 2002 . Under the Restructuring Order, while any obligation to maintain the Dividend Retention Fund is in effect, to the extent dividends are paid by INA Holdings Corporation to its parent, INA Financial Corporation, and to the extent INA Financial Corporation then pays such dividends to INA Corporation, a portion of those dividends must be withheld to replenish the principal of the Dividend Retention Fund to $ 50 million. During 2012 and 2011 , nil and $ 35 million respectively, were withheld from such dividends and deposited in the Dividend Retention Fund by INA Financial Corporation. Effective January 28, 2011 , the Pennsylvania Insurance Department clarified the scope of the Dividend Retention Fund that capital contributions from the Dividend Retention Fund to Century shall not be required until the XOL Agreement has less than $ 200 million of capacity remaining on an incurred basis for statutory reporting purposes. The amount of the capital contribution shall be the lesser of the amount necessary to restore the XOL Agreement remaining capacity to $ 200 million or the Dividend Retention Fund balance. The Dividend Retention Fund may not be terminated without prior written approval from the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner.

In addition, an ACE INA insurance subsidiary provided reinsurance coverage to Century in the amount of $ 800 million under an XOL, triggered if the statutory capital and surplus of Century falls below $ 25 million or if Century lacks liquid assets with which to pay claims as they become due.

Effective December 31, 2004 , ACE INA Holdings contributed $ 100 million to Century in exchange for a surplus note. After giving effect to the contribution and issuance of the surplus note, the statutory surplus of Century at December 31, 2012 was $ 25 million and approximately $ 394 million in statutory-basis losses have been ceded to the XOL on an inception-to-date basis. Century reports the amount ceded under the XOL in accordance with statutory accounting principles, which differ from GAAP by, among other things, allowing Century to discount its liabilities, including certain asbestos related and environmental


F-46


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


pollution liabilities. For GAAP reporting purposes, intercompany reinsurance recoverables related to the XOL are eliminated upon consolidation.

While ACE believes it has no legal obligation to fund losses above the XOL limit of coverage, ACE's consolidated results would nevertheless continue to include any losses above the limit of coverage for so long as the Brandywine companies remain consolidated subsidiaries of ACE.

Uncertainties relating to ACE's ultimate Brandywine exposure
In addition to the Dividend Retention Fund and XOL commitments described above, certain ACE entities are primarily liable for asbestos, environmental, and other exposures that they have reinsured to Century. Accordingly, if Century were to become insolvent and ACE were to lose control of Century, some or all of the recoverables due to these ACE companies from Century could become uncollectible, yet those ACE entities would continue to be responsible to pay claims to their insureds or reinsureds. At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , the aggregate reinsurance balances ceded by the active ACE companies to Century were approximately $ 958 million and $ 877 million, respectively. At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , Century's carried gross reserves (including reserves ceded by the active ACE companies to Century) were $ 2.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion, respectively. ACE believes the intercompany reinsurance recoverables, which relate to liabilities payable over many years (i.e., 25 years or more), are not impaired. A portion of the liabilities ceded to Century by its affiliates have, in turn, been ceded by Century to NICO and, at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , remaining cover on a paid loss basis was approximately $ 18 million and $ 386 million , respectively. Should Century's loss reserves experience adverse development in the future and should Century be placed into rehabilitation or liquidation, the reinsurance recoverables due from Century to its affiliates would be payable only after the payment in full of certain expenses and liabilities, including administrative expenses and direct policy liabilities. Thus, the intercompany reinsurance recoverables would be at risk to the extent of the shortage of assets remaining to pay these recoverables. Losses ceded by Century to the active ACE companies and other amounts owed to Century by the active ACE companies were, in the aggregate, approximately $ 402 million and $ 171 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively.

8 . Taxation

Under Swiss law, a resident company is subject to income tax at the federal, cantonal, and communal levels that is levied on net worldwide income. Income attributable to permanent establishments or real estate located abroad is excluded from the Swiss tax base. ACE Limited is a holding company and, therefore, is exempt from cantonal and communal income tax. As a result, ACE Limited is subject to Swiss income tax only at the federal level. Furthermore, participation relief (i.e., tax relief) is granted to ACE Limited at the federal level for qualifying dividend income and capital gains related to the sale of qualifying participations (i.e., subsidiaries). It is expected that the participation relief will result in a full exemption of participation income from federal income tax. ACE Limited is resident in the Canton and City of Zurich and, as such, is subject to an annual cantonal and communal capital tax on the taxable equity of ACE Limited in Switzerland.

ACE has two Swiss operating subsidiaries resident in the Canton and City of Zurich, an insurance company, ACE Insurance (Switzerland) Limited, which, in turn, owns a reinsurance company, ACE Reinsurance (Switzerland) Limited. Both are subject to federal, cantonal, and communal income tax and to annual cantonal and communal capital tax.

Under current Bermuda law, ACE Limited and its Bermuda subsidiaries are not required to pay any taxes on income or capital gains. If a Bermuda law were enacted that would impose taxes on income or capital gains, ACE Limited and the Bermuda subsidiaries have received an undertaking from the Minister of Finance in Bermuda that would exempt such companies from Bermudian taxation until March 2035.

Income from ACE's operations at Lloyd's is subject to United Kingdom corporation taxes. Lloyd's is required to pay U.S. income tax on U.S. connected income (U.S. income) written by Lloyd's syndicates. Lloyd's has a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whereby the amount of tax due on this business is calculated by Lloyd's and remitted directly to the IRS. These amounts are then charged to the accounts of the Names/Corporate Members in proportion to their participation in the relevant syndicates. ACE's Corporate Members are subject to this arrangement but, as U.K. domiciled companies, will receive U.K. corporation tax credits for any U.S. income tax incurred up to the value of the equivalent U.K. corporation income tax charge on the U.S. income.

ACE Group Holdings and its respective subsidiaries are subject to income taxes imposed by U.S. authorities and file a consolidated U.S. tax return. Combined Insurance and its subsidiaries will file a separate consolidated U.S. tax return for tax years prior to 2014. Should ACE Group Holdings pay a dividend to ACE, withholding taxes would apply. Currently, however, no



F-47


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


withholding taxes are accrued with respect to such un-remitted earnings as management has no intention of remitting these earnings. Similarly, no taxes have been provided on the un-remitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries as management has no intention of remitting these earnings. The cumulative amount that would be subject to withholding tax, if distributed, as well as the determination of the associated tax liability are not practicable to compute; however, such amount would be material to ACE. Certain international operations of ACE are also subject to income taxes imposed by the jurisdictions in which they operate.

ACE is not subject to income taxation other than as stated above.  There can be no assurance that there will not be changes in applicable laws, regulations, or treaties which might require ACE to change the way it operates or become subject to taxation.

ACE's domestic operations are in Switzerland, the jurisdiction where we are legally organized, incorporated, and registered. Domestic operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 are not considered significant to the consolidated income before income taxes for the respective periods.

The following table presents the provision for income taxes:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Current tax expense
$
305

 
$
485

 
$
443

Deferred tax expense (benefit)
(35
)
 
17

 
110

Provision for income taxes
$
270

 
$
502

 
$
553


The most significant jurisdictions contributing to the overall taxation of ACE are calculated using the following rates: Switzerland 7.83 percent , Bermuda 0.0 percent , U.S. 35.0 percent , and U.K. 24.5 percent . The following table presents a reconciliation of the difference between the provision for income taxes and the expected tax provision at the Swiss statutory income tax rate:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Expected tax provision at Swiss statutory tax rate
$
233

 
$
160

 
$
285

Permanent differences:
 
 
 
 
 
Taxes on earnings subject to rate other than Swiss statutory rate
129

 
323

 
327

Tax-exempt interest and dividends received deduction, net of proration
(24
)
 
(21
)
 
(20
)
Net withholding taxes
23

 
19

 
15

Favorable resolution of prior years' tax matters and closing statutes of limitations
(124
)
 

 
(21
)
Change in valuation allowance
4

 
(2
)
 
(3
)
Non-taxable acquisition gain

 

 
(61
)
Other
29

 
23

 
31

Total provision for income taxes
$
270

 
$
502

 
$
553




F-48


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following table presents the components of the net deferred tax assets:
 
December 31

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
Loss reserve discount
$
849

 
$
933

Unearned premiums reserve
98

 
85

Foreign tax credits
1,131

 
1,074

Investments
43

 
67

Provision for uncollectible balances
110

 
113

Loss carry-forwards
55

 
43

Other, net
110

 
31

Cumulative translation adjustment

 
5

Total deferred tax assets
2,396

 
2,351

Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
Deferred policy acquisition costs
68

 
47

VOBA and other intangible assets
379

 
372

Un-remitted foreign earnings
795

 
810

Unrealized appreciation on investments
586

 
392

Cumulative translation adjustment
59

 

Total deferred tax liabilities
1,887

 
1,621

Valuation allowance
56

 
57

Net deferred tax assets
$
453

 
$
673


The valuation allowance of $ 56 million at December 31, 2012 , and $ 57 million at December 31, 2011 , reflects management's assessment, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized due to the inability of certain foreign subsidiaries to generate sufficient taxable income and the inability of ACE Group Holdings and its subsidiaries to utilize foreign tax credits. Adjustments to the valuation allowance are made when there is a change in management's assessment of the amount of deferred tax assets that are realizable.

At December 31, 2012 , ACE has net operating loss carry-forwards of $ 157 million which, if unutilized, will expire in the years 2013 through 2030, and a foreign tax credit carry-forward in the amount of $ 76 million which, if unutilized, will expire in the years 2015 through 2022.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits:
 
December 31

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

Balance, beginning of year
$
134

 
$
139

Additions based on tax provisions related to the current year
19

 
1

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

 
(6
)
Reductions for settlements with tax authorities
(16
)
 

Reductions for the lapse of the applicable statutes of limitations
(111
)
 

Balance, end of year
$
26

 
$
134


Not included in the balance above at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , is $ 18 million and $ 1 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, an unfavorable resolution of these temporary items would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Consequently, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2012 , that would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized, is $ 8 million.




F-49


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


ACE recognizes accruals for interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Tax-related interest expense (income) and penalties reported in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were $ (8) million, $ 3 million, and $ (1) million, respectively. At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , ACE recorded $ 12 million and $ 22 million, respectively, in liabilities for tax-related interest and penalties in our consolidated balance sheets.

In 2010, ACE reached final settlement with the IRS Appeals Division (Appeals) regarding its federal tax returns for 2002, 2003, and 2004. As a result of the settlement, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits including interest was reduced by approximately $ 21 million. In 2012, ACE reached final settlement with Appeals regarding several issues raised by the IRS Examination Division in its federal tax returns for 2005, 2006, and 2007. The settlement of these issues had no net impact on our results of operations. During 2012, the IRS completed its field examination of ACE’s federal tax returns for 2008 and 2009. No material adjustments resulted from this examination. During 2012, ACE recognized a $ 124 million benefit resulting from the favorable resolution of various prior years' tax matters and the closing of statutes of limitations. It is reasonably possible that over the next twelve months, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change resulting from the re-evaluation of unrecognized tax benefits arising from examinations of taxing authorities and the closing of tax statutes of limitations. With few exceptions, ACE is no longer subject to state and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2005.

9 . Debt

Debt outstanding consisted of the following:
 
December 31

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

Short-term debt
 
 
 
Reverse repurchase agreements
$
1,401

 
$
1,251

Long-term debt
 
 
 
ACE INA senior notes due 2014
$
500

 
$
500

ACE INA senior notes due 2015
449

 
449

ACE INA senior notes due 2015
699

 
699

ACE INA senior notes due 2017
500

 
500

ACE INA senior notes due 2018
300

 
300

ACE INA senior notes due 2019
500

 
500

ACE INA debentures due 2029
100

 
100

ACE INA senior notes due 2036
299

 
299

Other
13

 
13

 
$
3,360

 
$
3,360

Trust Preferred Securities
 
 
 
ACE INA capital securities due 2030
$
309

 
$
309


a) Short-term debt
ACE has executed reverse repurchase agreements with certain counterparties under which ACE agreed to sell securities and repurchase them at a future date for a predetermined price. At December 31, 2012 , there were $ 1.4 billion of reverse repurchase agreements outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 0.40 percent .

b) ACE INA notes and debentures
In June 2004, ACE INA issued $ 500 million of 5.875 percent senior notes due June 2014. These notes are redeemable at any time at ACE INA's option subject to a “make-whole” premium plus 0.20 percent . The notes are also redeemable at par plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in tax law. The notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund. These senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE's other


F-50


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


senior obligations. They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

In May 2008, ACE INA issued $ 450 million of 5.6 percent senior notes due May 2015. These notes are redeemable at any time at ACE INA's option subject to a “make-whole” premium plus 0.35 percent . The notes are also redeemable at par plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in tax law. The notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund. These senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE's other senior obligations. They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

In November 2010, ACE INA issued $ 700 million of 2.6 percent senior notes due November 2015. These notes are redeemable at any time at ACE INA's option subject to a “make-whole” premium plus 0.20 percent . The notes are also redeemable at par plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in tax law. The notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund. These senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE's other senior obligations. They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

In February 2007, ACE INA issued $ 500 million of 5.7 percent senior notes due February 2017. These notes are redeemable at any time at ACE INA's option subject to a “make-whole” premium plus 0.20 percent . The notes are also redeemable at par plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in tax law. These notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund.  These senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE's other senior obligations.  They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

In February 2008, ACE INA issued $ 300 million of 5.8 percent senior notes due March 2018.  These notes are redeemable at any time at ACE INA's option subject to a “make-whole” premium plus 0.35 percent . The notes are also redeemable at par plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in tax law. These notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund.  These senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE's other senior obligations.  They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

In June 2009, ACE INA issued $ 500 million of 5.9 percent senior notes due June 2019. These notes are redeemable at any time at ACE INA's option subject to a “make-whole” premium plus 0.40 percent . The notes are also redeemable at par plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in tax law. The notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund. These senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE's other senior obligations. They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

In August 1999, ACE INA issued $ 100 million of 8.875 percent debentures due August 2029.  Subject to certain exceptions, the debentures are not redeemable before maturity and do not have the benefit of any sinking fund.  These unsecured debentures are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE INA's other senior indebtedness. They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

In May 2006, ACE INA issued $ 300 million of 6.7 percent notes due May 2036. These notes are redeemable at any time at ACE INA's option subject to a “make-whole” premium plus 0.20 percent . The notes are also redeemable at par plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of certain changes in tax law. These notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund. These senior unsecured notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by ACE Limited and they rank equally with all of ACE's other senior obligations. They also contain customary limitations on lien provisions as well as customary events of default provisions which, if breached, could result in the accelerated maturity of such senior debt.

c) Other long-term debt
In August 2005, ACE American borrowed $ 10 million from the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority (PIDA) at a rate of 2.75 percent due September 2020.  The proceeds from PIDA were restricted for purposes of defraying construction costs of a new office building.   Principal and interest are payable on a monthly basis. The current balance outstanding is $ 6 million.




F-51


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


In addition, in 1999, ACE American assumed a CIGNA loan of $ 8 million borrowed from the City of Philadelphia under the Urban Development Action Grant with an imputed rate of 7.1 percent due December 2019. The current amount outstanding is $ 7 million.

d ) ACE INA capital securities
In March 2000, ACE Capital Trust II, a Delaware statutory business trust, publicly issued $ 300 million of 9.7 percent Capital Securities (the Capital Securities). At the same time, ACE INA purchased $ 9.2 million of common securities of ACE Capital Trust II.

The Capital Securities mature in April 2030. Distributions on the Capital Securities are payable semi-annually. ACE Capital Trust II may defer these payments for up to ten consecutive semi-annual periods (but no later than April 1, 2030). Any deferred payments would accrue interest compounded semi-annually if ACE INA defers interest on the Subordinated Debentures due 2030 (as defined below).

The sole assets of ACE Capital Trust II consist of $ 309 million principal amount of 9.7 percent Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (the Subordinated Debentures) issued by ACE INA. The Subordinated Debentures mature in April 2030. Interest on the Subordinated Debentures is payable semi-annually. ACE INA may defer such interest payments (but no later than April 1, 2030), with such deferred payments accruing interest compounded semi-annually. ACE INA may redeem the Subordinated Debentures in the event certain changes in tax or investment company law occur at a redemption price equal to accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date plus the greater of (i) 100 percent of the principal amount thereof, or (ii) the sum of the present value of scheduled payments of principal and interest on the debentures from the redemption date to April 1, 2030. The Capital Securities and the ACE Capital Trust II Common Securities will be redeemed upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures.

ACE Limited has guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, ACE INA's obligations under the Subordinated Debentures, and distributions and other payments due on the Capital Securities. These guarantees, when taken together with ACE's obligations under expense agreements entered into with ACE Capital Trust II, provide a full and unconditional guarantee of amounts due on the Capital Securities.

10 . Commitments, contingencies, and guarantees

a) Derivative instruments
Derivative instruments employed
ACE maintains positions in derivative instruments such as futures, options, swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts for which the primary purposes are to manage duration and foreign currency exposure, yield enhancement, or to obtain an exposure to a particular financial market. Along with convertible bonds and to be announced mortgage-backed securities (TBA), discussed below, these are the most numerous and frequent derivative transactions.
ACE maintains positions in convertible bond investments that contain embedded derivatives. In addition, ACE, from time to time, purchases TBAs as part of its investing activities. These securities are included within the fixed maturities available for sale (FM AFS) portfolio. At December 31, 2012 , ACE had no positions in TBAs.
Under reinsurance programs covering GLBs, ACE assumes the risk of GLBs, including GMIB and GMAB, associated with variable annuity contracts. The GMIB risk is triggered if, at the time the contract holder elects to convert the accumulated account value to a periodic payment stream (annuitize), the accumulated account value is not sufficient to provide a guaranteed minimum level of monthly income. The GMAB risk is triggered if, at contract maturity, the contract holder’s account value is less than a guaranteed minimum value. The GLB reinsurance product meets the definition of a derivative instrument. Benefit reserves in respect of GLBs are classified as Future policy benefits (FPB) while the fair value derivative adjustment is classified within Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities (AP). ACE also maintains positions in exchange-traded equity futures contracts and options on equity market indices to limit equity exposure in the GMDB and GLB blocks of business.
In relation to certain debt issuances, ACE, from time to time, enters into interest rate swap transactions for the purpose of either fixing or reducing borrowing costs. Although the use of these interest rate swaps has the economic effect of fixing or reducing borrowing costs on a net basis, gross interest expense on the related debt issuances is included in Interest expense while the settlements related to the interest rate swaps are reflected in Net realized gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2012 , ACE had no in-force interest rate swaps.


F-52


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


ACE, from time to time, buys credit default swaps to mitigate global credit risk exposure, primarily related to reinsurance recoverables. At December 31, 2012 , ACE had no in-force credit default swaps.
All derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in Net realized gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations. None of the derivative instruments are designated as hedges for accounting purposes.

The following table presents the balance sheet locations, fair values in an asset or (liability) position, and notional values/payment provisions of our derivative instruments: 
 
 
 
December 31
 
 
December 31
 
 
 
 
 

2012

 
2011
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair Value

 
Notional
Value/
Payment
Provision

 
Fair Value

 
Notional
Value/
Payment
Provision

Investment and embedded derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward contracts
AP
 
$

 
$
620

 
$
7

 
$
674

Cross-currency swaps
AP
 

 
50

 

 

Futures contracts on money market instruments
AP
 
1

 
2,710

 
7

 
10,476

Futures contracts on notes and bonds
AP
 
10

 
915

 
(4
)
 
1,055

Options on money market instruments
AP
 

 

 

 
292

Convertible bonds
FM AFS
 
309

 
279

 
357

 
353

TBAs
FM AFS
 

 

 
60

 
56

 
 
 
$
320

 
$
4,574

 
$
427

 
$
12,906

Other derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Futures contracts on equities (1)
AP
 
$
(6
)
 
$
2,308

 
$
(16
)
 
$
1,367

Options on equity market indices (1)
AP
 
30

 
250

 
54

 
250

Credit default swaps
AP
 

 

 
3

 
350

Other
AP
 

 

 

 
6

 
 
 
$
24

 
$
2,558

 
$
41

 
$
1,973

GLB (2)
AP/FPB
 
$
(1,352
)
 
$
1,100

 
$
(1,505
)
 
$
1,378

(1)  
Related to GMDB and GLB blocks of business.
(2)  
Includes both future policy benefits reserves and fair value derivative adjustment. Refer to Note 5 c ) for additional information. Note that the payment provision related to GLB is the net amount at risk. The concept of a notional value does not apply to the GLB reinsurance contracts.



F-53


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following table presents net realized gains (losses) related to derivative instrument activity in the consolidated statements of operations:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Investment and embedded derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward contracts
$
(9
)
 
$
6

 
$
21

All other futures contracts and options
(22
)
 
(98
)
 
29

Convertible bonds
25

 
(50
)
 
7

TBAs

 
(1
)
 
1

Total investment and embedded derivative instruments
$
(6
)
 
$
(143
)
 
$
58

GLB and other derivative instruments
 
 
 
 
 
GLB (1)
$
171

 
$
(779
)
 
$
(28
)
Futures contracts on equities (2)
(273
)
 
(12
)
 
(140
)
Options on equity market indices (2)
(24
)
 
8

 
(10
)
Interest rate swaps

 

 
(21
)
Credit default swaps
(4
)
 
(4
)
 
1

Other

 

 
1

Total GLB and other derivative instruments
$
(130
)
 
$
(787
)
 
$
(197
)
 
$
(136
)
 
$
(930
)
 
$
(139
)
(1)  
Excludes foreign exchange gains (losses) related to GLB.
(2)  
Related to GMDB and GLB blocks of business. 
Derivative instrument objectives

(i) Foreign currency exposure management
A foreign currency forward contract (forward) is an agreement between participants to exchange specific foreign currencies at a future date. ACE uses forwards to minimize the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies.

(ii) Duration management and market exposure
Futures
Futures contracts give the holder the right and obligation to participate in market movements, determined by the index or underlying security on which the futures contract is based. Settlement is made daily in cash by an amount equal to the change in value of the futures contract times a multiplier that scales the size of the contract. Exchange-traded futures contracts on money market instruments, notes and bonds are used in fixed maturity portfolios to more efficiently manage duration as substitutes for ownership of the money market instruments, bonds and notes without significantly increasing the risk in the portfolio. Investments in futures contracts may be made only to the extent that there are assets under management not otherwise committed.

Exchange-traded equity futures contracts are used to limit exposure to a severe equity market decline, which would cause an increase in expected claims and therefore, reserves for GMDB and GLB reinsurance business.

Options
An option contract conveys to the holder the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or sell a specified amount or value of an underlying security at a fixed price. Option contracts are used in the investment portfolio as protection against unexpected shifts in interest rates, which would affect the duration of the fixed maturity portfolio. By using options in the portfolio, the overall interest rate sensitivity of the portfolio can be reduced. Option contracts may also be used as an alternative to futures contracts in the synthetic strategy as described above.

Another use for option contracts is to limit exposure to a severe equity market decline, which would cause an increase in expected claims and therefore, reserves for GMDB and GLB reinsurance business.

The price of an option is influenced by the underlying security, expected volatility, time to expiration, and supply and demand.


F-54


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The credit risk associated with the above derivative financial instruments relates to the potential for non-performance by counterparties. Although non-performance is not anticipated, in order to minimize the risk of loss, management monitors the creditworthiness of its counterparties and obtains collateral. The performance of exchange-traded instruments is guaranteed by the exchange on which they trade. For non-exchange-traded instruments, the counterparties are principally banks which must meet certain criteria according to our investment guidelines.

Cross-currency swaps
Cross currency swaps are agreements under which two counterparties exchange interest payments and principal denominated in different currencies at a future date.  We use cross-currency swaps to reduce the foreign currency and interest rate risk by converting cash flows back into local currency.  We invest in foreign currency denominated investments to improve credit diversification and also to obtain better duration matching to our liabilities that is limited in the local currency market.

Interest rate swaps
We use interest rate swaps related to certain debt issuances for the purpose of either fixing and/or reducing borrowing costs.

Credit default swaps
A credit default swap is a bilateral contract under which two counterparties agree to isolate and separately trade the credit risk of at least one third-party reference entity. Under a credit default swap agreement, ACE as a protection buyer pays a periodic fee to a protection seller in exchange for a contingent payment by the seller upon a credit event (such as a default or failure to pay) related to the reference entity. When a credit event is triggered, the protection seller pays the protection buyer the difference between the fair value of assets and the principal amount.

(iii) Convertible security investments
A convertible bond is a debt instrument that can be converted into a predetermined amount of the issuer’s equity at certain times prior to the bond’s maturity. The convertible option is an embedded derivative within the fixed maturity host instruments which are classified in the investment portfolio as available for sale. ACE purchases convertible bonds for their total return and not specifically for the conversion feature.

(iv) TBA
By acquiring TBAs, we make a commitment to purchase a future issuance of mortgage-backed securities. For the period between purchase of the TBAs and issuance of the underlying security, we account for our position as a derivative in the consolidated financial statements. ACE purchases TBAs both for their total return and for the flexibility they provide related to our mortgage-backed security strategy.

(v) GLB
Under the GLB program, as the assuming entity, ACE is obligated to provide coverage until the expiration or maturity of the underlying deferred annuity contracts or the expiry of the reinsurance treaty. Premiums received under the reinsurance treaties are classified as premium. Expected losses allocated to premiums received are classified as Future policy benefits and valued similar to GMDB reinsurance. Other changes in fair value, principally arising from changes in expected losses allocated to expected future premiums, are classified as Net realized gains (losses). Fair value represents management’s estimate of exit price and thus, includes a risk margin. We may recognize a realized loss for other changes in fair value due to adverse changes in the capital markets (e.g., declining interest rates and/or declining equity markets) and changes in actual or estimated future policyholder behavior (e.g., increased annuitization or decreased lapse rates) although we expect the business to be profitable. We believe this presentation provides the most meaningful disclosure of changes in the underlying risk within the GLB reinsurance programs for a given reporting period.

b) Concentrations of credit risk
Our investment portfolio is managed following prudent standards of diversification. Specific provisions limit the allowable holdings of a single issue and issuer. We believe that there are no significant concentrations of credit risk associated with our investments. Our three largest exposures by issuer at December 31, 2012 , were JP Morgan Chase & Co., General Electric Company, and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Our largest exposure by industry at December 31, 2012 was financial services.

We market our insurance and reinsurance worldwide primarily through insurance and reinsurance brokers. We assume a degree of credit risk associated with brokers with whom we transact business. During the years ended December 31, 2012 , and both 2011 and 2010, approximately 11 percent and 12 percent , respectively, of our gross premiums written were generated from or placed by Marsh, Inc. This entity is a large, well established company and there are no indications that it is financially troubled at December 31, 2012 . During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately 10 percent of our gross



F-55


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


premiums written were generated from or placed by Aon Corporation and its affiliates. No other broker and no one insured or reinsured accounted for more than 10 percent of gross premiums written in the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 .

c) Other investments
At December 31, 2012 , included in Other investments in the consolidated balance sheet are investments in limited partnerships and partially-owned investment companies with a carrying value of $1.7 billion. In connection with these investments, we have commitments that may require funding of up to $1.2 billion over the next several years. 

d) Letters of credit
We have a $ 1.0 billion unsecured operational LOC facility (adjustable to $ 1.5 billion upon consent of the issuers) expiring in November 2017. We are allowed to utilize up to $ 300 million of this LOC facility as an unsecured revolving credit facility. This facility replaces the $ 1.0 billion syndicated letter of credit facility and $ 500 million unsecured revolving credit facility that expired in November 2012.   At December 31, 2012 , outstanding LOCs issued under this facility were $ 619 million. We also have a $ 500 million unsecured operational LOC facility expiring in June 2014. At December 31, 2012 , this facility was fully utilized.

To satisfy funding requirements of ACE's Lloyd's Syndicate 2488 through 2013, we have a series of four bilateral uncollateralized LOC facilities totaling $ 425 million. LOCs issued under these facilities will expire no earlier than December 2017. At December 31, 2012 , $ 400 million of this facility was utilized.

These facilities require that ACE Limited and/or certain of its subsidiaries continue to maintain certain covenants. ACE Limited is also required to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth covenant and a maximum leverage covenant, which have been met at December 31, 2012 .

e) Legal proceedings
(i) Claims and other litigation
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to claims litigation involving disputed interpretations of policy coverages and, in some jurisdictions, direct actions by allegedly-injured persons seeking damages from policyholders. These lawsuits, involving claims on policies issued by our subsidiaries which are typical to the insurance industry in general and in the normal course of business, are considered in our loss and loss expense reserves. In addition to claims litigation, we are subject to lawsuits and regulatory actions in the normal course of business that do not arise from or directly relate to claims on insurance policies. This category of business litigation typically involves, among other things, allegations of underwriting errors or misconduct, employment claims, regulatory activity, or disputes arising from our business ventures. In the opinion of management, our ultimate liability for these matters could be, but we believe is not likely to be, material to our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

(ii) Business practices litigation
ACE Limited, ACE INA Holdings Inc., and ACE USA, Inc., along with a number of other insurers and brokers, were named in a series of federal putative nationwide class actions brought by insurance policyholders. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated these cases in the District of New Jersey. On August 1, 2005, plaintiffs in the New Jersey consolidated proceedings filed two consolidated amended complaints - one concerning commercial insurance and the other concerning employee benefit plans. The employee benefit plans litigation against ACE Limited and certain subsidiaries has been dismissed.

In the commercial insurance complaint, the plaintiffs named ACE Limited, ACE INA Holdings Inc., ACE USA, Inc., ACE American Insurance Co., Illinois Union Insurance Co., and Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America. They allege that certain brokers and insurers, including certain ACE entities, conspired to increase premiums and allocate customers through the use of “B” quotes and contingent commissions. In addition, they allege that the broker defendants received additional income by improperly placing their clients’ business with insurers through related wholesale entities that acted as intermediaries between brokers and insurers. Plaintiffs also allege that broker defendants tied the purchase of primary insurance to the placement of such coverage with reinsurance carriers through the broker defendants’ reinsurance broker subsidiaries. The complaint asserts the following causes of action against the ACE defendants: Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), federal antitrust law, state antitrust law, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment.
In 2006 and 2007, the Court dismissed plaintiffs’ first two attempts to properly plead a case without prejudice and permitted plaintiffs one final opportunity to re-plead. The amended complaint, filed on May 22, 2007, purported to add several new ACE


F-56


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


defendants: ACE Group Holdings, Inc., ACE US Holdings, Inc., Westchester Fire Insurance Company, INA Corporation, INA Financial Corporation, INA Holdings Corporation, ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company, and Pacific Employers Insurance Company. Plaintiffs also added a new antitrust claim against Marsh, the ACE defendants, and other insurers based on the same allegations as the other claims but limited to excess casualty insurance. In 2007, the Court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ antitrust and RICO claims with prejudice. The Court also declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ state law claims and dismissed those claims without prejudice. Plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. On August 16, 2010, the Third Circuit affirmed, in part, and vacated, in part, the District Court’s previous dismissals with instructions for further briefing at the District Court on remand. Defendants renewed their motions consistent with the Third Circuit’s instructions. On June 28, 2011 the District Court administratively terminated defendants’ motions without prejudice to re-file after adjudication of issues related to a proposed class settlement involving a number of other parties and stayed the case. On October 17, 2011, the Court lifted the stay and, shortly thereafter, entered an order permitting defendants to re-file their motions to dismiss.  Defendants did so on October 21, 2011.  On April 30, 2012 the Court entered a discovery scheduling order.  On May 31, 2012, the Court once again administratively terminated defendants' motions to dismiss.  On September 25, 2012, at defendants' urging, the Court ordered that the defendants' motions to dismiss would be reinstated.
On January 11, 2013, ACE reached a settlement in principle with the class action commercial plaintiffs for $ 4.2 million. If approved by the Court, this would end ACE's involvement in the class action lawsuit.
There are a number of additional federal actions brought by policyholders based on allegations similar to the allegations in the consolidated federal actions that were filed in, or transferred to, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordination (“tag-along cases”). On October 17, 2011 the Court lifted the stay in those matters, and on April 30, 2012 the Court entered a discovery scheduling order.  On September 25, 2012, at defendants' urging, the Court ordered the tag-along plaintiffs to file their final complaints.  The tag-along defendants served motions to dismiss or to compel arbitration on December 4, 2012 and December 21, 2012, respectively. The plaintiffs are required to file opposition briefs to the motions to dismiss on March 25, 2013 and to the motions to compel on March 3, 2013. The defendants reply briefs on the motions to dismiss are due on April 16, 2013 and for the motions to compel on March 23, 2013. Discovery is ongoing.
New Cingular Wireless Headquarters LLC et al. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. et al. (Case No. 06-5120; D.N.J.), was originally filed in the Northern District of Georgia on April 4, 2006. ACE Limited, ACE American Ins. Co., ACE USA, Inc., ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., Illinois Union Ins. Co., Pacific Employers Ins. Co., and Lloyd’s of London Syndicate 2488 AGM, along with a number of other insurers and brokers, are named.
Avery Dennison Corp. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. et al. (Case No. 07-00757; D.N.J.) was filed on February 13, 2007. ACE Limited, ACE INA Holdings Inc., ACE USA, Inc., and ACE American Insurance Co., along with a number of other insurers and brokers, are named. On February 22, 2013, ACE reached a confidential settlement in principle with Avery Dennison Corp. Once the agreement is finalized, this lawsuit will be dismissed with prejudice.
Henley Management Co., Inc. et al. v. Marsh, Inc. et al. (Case No. 07-2389; D.N.J.) was filed on May 27, 2007. ACE USA, Inc., along with a number of other insurers and Marsh, Inc., are named.
Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. et al. (Case No. 07-2535; D.N.J.) was originally filed in the Northern District of Georgia on October 12, 2007. ACE American Insurance Co., ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co., along with a number of other insurers and brokers, are named.
Lincoln Adventures LLC et al. v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London Members of Syndicates 0033 et al. (Case No. 07-60991; D.N.J.) was originally filed in the Southern District of Florida on July 13, 2007. Supreme Auto Transport LLC et al. v. Certain Underwriters of Lloyd’s of London, et al. (Case No. 07-6703; D.N.J.) (Supreme Auto) was originally filed in the Southern District of New York on July 25, 2007. Lloyd’s of London Syndicate 2488 AGM, along with a number of other Lloyd’s of London Syndicates and various brokers, are named in both actions. The allegations in these putative class-action lawsuits are similar to the allegations in the consolidated federal actions identified above, although these lawsuits focus on alleged conduct within the London insurance market. On May 29, 2012 the Supreme Auto case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiffs.
As of February 27, 2013, plaintiffs have not specified an amount of alleged damages in any of the remaining tag-along cases. The proceedings in the tag-along cases were stayed at a very early stage, before the ACE defendants could challenge the sufficiency of the claims with, for example, motions to dismiss. Also, the scope of the tag-along cases, in large part, will be affected by the outcome of the Court's decision on defendants' motions to dismiss. As a result, ACE is unable to reasonably estimate the potential loss or range of losses, if any, arising from these litigations.



F-57


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


In addition to the related federal cases, there is one pending state case with allegations similar to those in the consolidated federal actions described above:
Van Emden Management Corporation v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al. (Case No. 05-0066A; Superior Court of Massachusetts), a class action in Massachusetts, was filed on January 13, 2005. Illinois Union Insurance Company is named. The Van Emden case has been stayed pending resolution of the consolidated proceedings in the District of New Jersey or until further order of the Court.
As of February 27, 2013, plaintiffs have not specified an amount of alleged damages in this case. The proceedings were stayed at a very early stage, before Illinois Union could challenge the sufficiency of the claims with, for example, a motion to dismiss. As a result, ACE is unable to reasonably estimate the potential loss or range of losses, if any, arising from this litigation.
In all of the lawsuits described above, except where specifically noted, plaintiffs seek compensatory and in some cases special damages without specifying an amount. As a result, ACE cannot at this time estimate its potential costs related to these legal matters and, accordingly, no liability for compensatory damages has been established in the consolidated financial statements.

In the opinion of management, our ultimate liability for these matters could be, but we believe is not likely to be, material to our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

f) Lease commitments
We lease office space and equipment in the countries in which we operate under operating leases which expire at various dates through 2033. We renew and enter into new leases in the ordinary course of business as required. Total rent expense with respect to these operating leases was $ 112 million, $ 114 million, and $ 83 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively. Future minimum lease payments under the leases are expected to be as follows:
For the year ending December 31
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2013
$
91

2014
79

2015
69

2016
60

2017
51

Thereafter
151

Total minimum future lease commitments
$
501


11 . Shareholders’ equity

a) Common Shares
All of ACE’s Common Shares are authorized under Swiss corporate law. Though the par value of Common Shares is stated in Swiss francs, ACE continues to use U.S. dollars as its reporting currency for preparing the consolidated financial statements. Under Swiss corporate law, we may not generally issue Common Shares below their par value. In the event there is a need to raise common equity at a time when the trading price of ACE's Common Shares is below par value, we will obtain shareholder approval to decrease the par value of the Common Shares.

Under Swiss corporate law, dividends, including distributions through a reduction in par value (par value reduction), must be stated in Swiss francs though dividend payments are made by ACE in U.S. dollars. Dividend distributions following ACE's redomestication to Switzerland in July 2008 through March 2011 were paid in the form of a par value reduction (under the methods approved by our shareholders at our Annual General Meetings) and had the effect of reducing par value per Common Share each time a dividend was distributed. In light of a January 1, 2011 Swiss tax law change, shareholders at our May 2011 Annual General Meeting approved a dividend for the following year from capital contribution reserves (Additional paid-in capital), a subaccount of legal reserves.

In November 2011, the Board recommended that our shareholders approve a resolution to increase our quarterly dividend from $0.35 per share to $0.47 per share for the payment made on January 31, 2012 and the payment made on April 20, 2012. This proposed increase was approved by our shareholders at the January 9, 2012 Extraordinary General Meeting.


F-58


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



At our May 2012 annual general meeting, our shareholders approved a dividend for the following year, payable in four quarterly installments after the May 2012 annual general meeting in the form of a distribution by way of a par value reduction. We have determined this procedure is more appropriate for us at this time due to current Swiss law.

b) Shares issued, outstanding, authorized, and conditional
The following table presents a roll-forward of changes in Common Shares issued and outstanding:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
 
2012

2011

2010

Shares issued, beginning of year
342,832,412

341,094,559

337,841,616

Shares issued, net


2,268,000

Exercise of stock options

1,737,853

984,943

Shares issued, end of year
342,832,412

342,832,412

341,094,559

Common Shares in treasury, end of year
(2,510,878
)
(5,905,136
)
(6,151,707
)
Shares issued and outstanding, end of year
340,321,534

336,927,276

334,942,852

Common Shares issued to employee trust
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of year
(9,467
)
(101,481
)
(101,481
)
Shares redeemed

92,014


Balance, end of year
(9,467
)
(9,467
)
(101,481
)

Prior to August 2011, exercises of stock options were satisfied through newly issued shares. From August 2011 onward, exercises of stock options were satisfied through Common shares in treasury. Other decreases in Common Shares in treasury are principally due to grants of restricted stock, and purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). Increases in Common Shares in treasury are due to open market repurchases of Common Shares and the surrender of Common Shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock and the forfeiture of unvested restricted stock.

For the years ended December 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , ACE repurchased 100,000 Common Shares, 2,058,860 Common Shares, and 4,926,082 Common Shares in a series of open market transactions, respectively. The cost of these shares, which were placed in treasury, totaled $7 million , $132 million , and $ 303 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively. ACE repurchased these Common Shares to partially offset potential dilution from the exercise of stock options and the granting of restricted stock under share-based compensation plans.

At December 31, 2012 , and 2011 , 2,510,878 Common Shares and 5,905,136 Common Shares, respectively, remain in treasury after net shares redeemed under employee share-based compensation plans. Common Shares held in treasury are accounted for at cost.

Common Shares issued to employee trust are issued by ACE to a rabbi trust for deferred compensation obligations as discussed in Note 11 f) below.

Authorized share capital for general purposes
The ACE Limited Board of Directors (Board) has shareholder-approved authority as set forth in the Articles of Association to increase for general purposes ACE's share capital from time to time through May 16, 2014, by the issuance of up to 140,000,000 fully paid up Common Shares, with a par value equal to the par value of ACE's Common Shares as set forth in the Articles of Association at the time of any such issuance.

Conditional share capital for bonds and similar debt instruments
The share capital of ACE may be increased through the issuance of a maximum of 33,000,000 fully paid up Common Shares with a par value of CHF 28.89 each through the exercise of conversion and/or option or warrant rights granted in connection with bonds, notes, or similar instruments, issued or to be issued by ACE, including convertible debt instruments.




F-59


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Conditional share capital for employee benefit plans
The share capital of ACE may be increased through the issuance of a maximum of 25,410,929 fully paid up Common Shares with a par value of CHF 28.89 each in connection with the exercise of option rights granted to any employee of ACE, and any consultant, director, or other person providing services to ACE.

c) ACE Limited securities repurchase authorization
In August 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 303 million of ACE’s Common Shares through December 31, 2012.  The amount authorized in August 2011 was in addition to the $ 197 million balance remaining under a $ 600 million share repurchase program approved in November 2010. In November 2012, the Board of Directors authorized an extension through December 31, 2013. These authorizations were granted to allow ACE to repurchase Common Shares to partially offset potential dilution from the exercise of stock options and the granting of restricted stock under share-based compensation plans. Such repurchases may be made in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, block trades, accelerated repurchases and/or through option or other forward transactions. At December 31, 2012 , $461 million in share repurchase authorizations remained through December 31, 2013 pursuant to the November 2010, August 2011, and November 2012 Board authorizations. For the period January 1, 2013 through February 27, 2013, we repurchased 1,746,123 Common Shares for a total of $149 million in a series of open market transactions. As of February 27, 2013, $312 million in share repurchase authorizations remained through December 31, 2013.

d) General restrictions
The holders of the Common Shares are entitled to receive dividends as proposed by the Board and approved by the shareholders. Holders of Common Shares are allowed one vote per share provided that, if the controlled shares of any shareholder constitute ten percent or more of the outstanding Common Shares of ACE, only a fraction of the vote will be allowed so as not to exceed ten percent . Entry of acquirers of Common Shares as shareholders with voting rights in the share register may be refused if it would confer voting rights with respect to ten percent or more of the registered share capital recorded in the commercial register.

e) Dividends
As discussed above, dividend distributions on Common Shares following ACE's redomestication to Switzerland in July 2008 through March 31, 2011 were paid as a par value reduction while subsequent dividend distributions were funded from capital contribution reserves (Additional paid-in capital) and paid out of free reserves (Retained earnings) under the method approved by our shareholders at the May 2011 Annual General Meeting. At our May 2012 annual general meeting, our shareholders approved a dividend for the following year, payable in four quarterly installments after the May 2012 annual general meeting in the form of a distribution by way of a par value reduction. We have determined this procedure is more appropriate for us at this time due to current Swiss law. Dividend distributions on Common Shares amounted to CHF 1.91 ( $2.06 ) per Common Share (including par value reductions of CHF 1.38 per Common Share), CHF 1.22 ( $1.38 ) per Common Share (including a par value reduction of CHF 0.30 per Common Share), and CHF 1.31 ( $1.30 ) per Common Share for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Par value reductions have been reflected as such through Common Shares in the consolidated statements of shareholders' equity. The par value per Common Share at December 31, 2012 , stands at CHF 28.89 .

f) Deferred compensation obligation
ACE maintains rabbi trusts for deferred compensation plans principally for employees and former directors. The shares issued by ACE to the rabbi trusts in connection with deferrals of share compensation are classified in shareholders' equity and accounted for at historical cost in a manner similar to Common Shares in treasury. These shares are recorded in Common Shares issued to employee trust and the obligations are recorded in Deferred compensation obligation in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of the shares underlying the obligations are recorded in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and the related expense or income is recorded in Administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

The rabbi trusts also hold other assets, such as fixed maturities, equity securities, and life insurance policies. The assets of the rabbi trusts are consolidated with ACE's assets and reflected in Other investments in the consolidated balance sheets. Except for life insurance policies which are reflected at cash surrender value, these assets are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in Other (income) expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Except for obligations related to life insurance policies which are carried at cash surrender value, the related deferred compensation obligation is carried at fair value and included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets with changes reflected as a corresponding increase or decrease to Other (income) expense in the consolidated statements of operations.


F-60


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



12 . Share-based compensation

ACE has share-based compensation plans which currently provide for awards of stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units to its employees and members of the Board.

ACE principally issues restricted stock grants and stock options on a graded vesting schedule. ACE recognizes compensation cost for restricted stock and stock option grants with only service conditions that have a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in-substance, multiple awards. We incorporate an estimate of future forfeitures into the determination of compensation cost for both grants of restricted stock and stock options.

During 2004, we established the ACE Limited 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2004 LTIP), which replaced our prior incentive plans except for outstanding awards. The 2004 LTIP will continue in effect until terminated by the Board. Under the 2004 LTIP, a total of 30,600,000 Common Shares of ACE are authorized to be issued pursuant to awards made as stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock, and restricted stock units. The maximum number of shares that may be delivered to participants and their beneficiaries under the 2004 LTIP shall be equal to the sum of: (i) 30,600,000 shares; and (ii) any shares that are represented by awards granted under the prior plans that are forfeited, expired, or are canceled after the effective date of the 2004 LTIP, without delivery of shares or which result in the forfeiture of the shares back to ACE to the extent that such shares would have been added back to the reserve under the terms of the applicable prior plan. At December 31, 2012, a total of 6,593,991 shares remain available for future issuance under this plan.

The 2004 LTIP also provides for grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. ACE generally grants restricted stock and restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period, based on a graded vesting schedule. The restricted stock is granted at market close price on the day of grant. Each restricted stock unit represents our obligation to deliver to the holder one Common Share upon vesting.

At our May 2012 Annual General Meeting, our shareholders approved a 1,500,000 increase to the maximum number of authorized shares to be issued under the ESPP under the 2004 LTIP. At December 31, 2012, a total of 1,491,053 Common Shares remain available for issuance under the ESPP.

ACE generally issues Common Shares for the exercise of stock options, restricted stock, and purchases under the ESPP from un-issued reserved shares and Common Shares in treasury.

The following table presents pre-tax and after-tax share-based compensation expense:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Stock options and shares issued under ESPP:
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax
$
22

 
$
23

 
$
28

After-tax (1)
$
17

 
$
17

 
$
20

Restricted stock:
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax
$
109

 
$
108

 
$
111

After-tax
$
64

 
$
70

 
$
79

 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Excludes windfall tax benefit (shortfall) for share-based compensation recognized as a direct adjustment to Additional paid-in capital of $18 million , $6 million and $(1) million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of ACE's employee share-based awards was $119 million at December 31, 2012, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1 year.

Stock options
ACE's 2004 LTIP provides for grants of both incentive and non-qualified stock options principally at an option price per share equal to the fair value of ACE's Common Shares on the date of grant. Stock options are generally granted with a 3-year vesting



F-61


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


period and a 10-year term. The stock options vest in equal annual installments over the respective vesting period, which is also the requisite service period.

Included in ACE's share-based compensation expense in the year ended December 31, 2012 , is a portion of the cost related to the 2009-2012 stock option grants. The fair value of the stock options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the weighted-average assumptions noted below. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected life (estimated period of time from grant to exercise date) was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. Expected volatility was calculated as a blend of (a) historical volatility based on daily closing prices over a period equal to the expected life assumption, (b) long-term historical volatility based on daily closing prices over the period from ACE's initial public trading date through the most recent quarter, and (c) implied volatility derived from ACE's publicly traded options.

The fair value of the options issued is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following table presents the weighted-average model assumptions used for grants:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
 
2012

2011

2010

Dividend yield
2.7
%
2.2
%
2.5
%
Expected volatility
29.8
%
28.8
%
30.3
%
Risk-free interest rate
1.1
%
2.3
%
2.5
%
Forfeiture rate
6.5
%
6.5
%
7.5
%
Expected life
5.8 years

5.4 years

5.4 years


The following table presents a roll-forward of ACE's stock options:
(Intrinsic Value in millions of U.S. dollars)
Number of Options

 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price

 
Weighted-Average Fair Value

 
Total Intrinsic Value

Options outstanding, December 31, 2009
11,483,104

 
$
45.46

 
 
 
 
Granted
2,094,227

 
$
50.38

 
$
12.09

 
 
Exercised
(1,328,715
)
 
$
40.11

 
 
 
$
22

Forfeited
(305,723
)
 
$
49.77

 
 
 
 
Options outstanding, December 31, 2010
11,942,893

 
$
46.80

 
 
 
 
Granted
1,649,824

 
$
62.68

 
$
14.67

 
 
Exercised
(2,741,238
)
 
$
44.45

 
 
 
$
63

Forfeited
(271,972
)
 
$
51.33

 
 
 
 
Options outstanding, December 31, 2011
10,579,507

 
$
49.78

 
 
 
 
Granted
1,462,103

 
$
73.36

 
$
15.58

 
 
Exercised
(2,401,869
)
 
$
42.50

 
 
 
$
78

Forfeited
(190,082
)
 
$
61.87

 
 
 
 
Options outstanding, December 31, 2012
9,449,659

 
$
55.03

 
 
 
$
234

Options exercisable, December 31, 2012
6,446,407

 
$
50.26

 
 
 
$
190


The weighted-average remaining contractual term was 6.2 years for the stock options outstanding and 4.8 years for the stock options exercisable at December 31, 2012 . The amount of cash received during the year ended December 31, 2012 from the exercise of stock options was $95 million .

Restricted stock and restricted stock units
ACE's 2004 LTIP provides for grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period, based on a graded vesting schedule. ACE also grants restricted stock awards to non-management directors which vest at the following year's annual general meeting. The restricted stock is granted at market close price on the date of grant. Each restricted stock


F-62


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


unit represents our obligation to deliver to the holder one Common Share upon vesting. Included in our share-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 , is a portion of the cost related to the restricted stock granted in the years 2008 - 2012.

The following table presents a roll-forward of our restricted stock awards. Included in the roll-forward below are 25,669 restricted stock awards, 32,660 restricted stock awards, and 36,248 restricted stock awards that were granted to non-management directors during the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively:
 
Number of Restricted Stock

 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value

Unvested restricted stock, December 31, 2009
4,873,429

 
$
48.25

Granted
2,461,076

 
$
51.09

Vested
(1,771,423
)
 
$
50.79

Forfeited
(257,350
)
 
$
47.93

Unvested restricted stock, December 31, 2010
5,305,732

 
$
48.74

Granted
1,808,745

 
$
60.01

Vested
(1,929,189
)
 
$
50.82

Forfeited
(333,798
)
 
$
47.46

Unvested restricted stock, December 31, 2011
4,851,490

 
$
52.20

Granted
1,589,178

 
$
73.46

Vested
(1,923,385
)
 
$
52.71

Forfeited
(262,436
)
 
$
58.40

Unvested restricted stock, December 31, 2012
4,254,847

 
$
59.53


During the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , ACE awarded 262,549 restricted stock units, 261,214 restricted stock units, and 326,091 restricted stock units, respectively, to employees and officers of ACE and its subsidiaries each with a weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $73.41 , $62.85 , and $50.36 , respectively. At December 31, 2012, there were 637,085 unvested restricted stock units.

Prior to 2009, ACE granted restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors. Delivery of Common Shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors' termination from the Board. At December 31, 2012 , there were 196,431 deferred restricted stock units.

ESPP
The ESPP gives participating employees the right to purchase Common Shares through payroll deductions during consecutive subscription periods at a purchase price of 85 percent of the fair value of a Common Share on the exercise date (Purchase Price). Annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant's compensation or $25,000, whichever is less. The ESPP has two six-month subscription periods, the first of which runs between January 1 and June 30 and the second of which runs between July 1 and December 31 of each year. The amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the exercise date to purchase full shares of Common Shares. An exercise date is generally the last trading day of a subscription period. The number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount, at the exercise date, that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period, divided by the Purchase Price, rounded down to the next full share. Participants may withdraw from an offering before the exercise date and obtain a refund of the amounts withheld through payroll deductions. Pursuant to the provisions of the ESPP, during the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , employees paid $13 million , $ 12 million, and $ 10 million to purchase 198,244 shares, 205,812 shares, and 240,979 shares, respectively.




F-63


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


13 . Pension plans

ACE provides pension benefits to eligible employees and their dependents through various defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans sponsored by ACE. The defined contribution plans include a capital accumulation plan (401(k)) in the U.S. The defined benefit plans consist of various plans offered in certain jurisdictions outside of the U.S. and Bermuda.

Defined contribution plans (including 401(k))
Under these plans, employees' contributions may be supplemented by ACE matching contributions based on the level of employee contribution. These contributions are invested at the election of each employee in one or more of several investment portfolios offered by a third party investment advisor. Expenses for these plans totaled $99 million , $96 million , and $87 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively.

Defined benefit plans
We maintain non-contributory defined benefit plans that cover certain employees, principally located in Europe and Asia. We also provide a defined benefit plan to certain U.S.-based employees as a result of our acquisition of Penn Millers in November 2011. We account for pension benefits using the accrual method. Benefits under these plans are based on employees' years of service and compensation during final years of service. All underlying defined benefit plans are subject to periodic actuarial valuation by qualified local actuarial firms using actuarial models in calculating the pension expense and liability for each plan. We use December 31 as the measurement date for our defined benefit pension plans.

At December 31, 2012 , the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation were $487 million and $531 million , respectively. The fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation were $434 million and $508 million , respectively, at December 31, 2011 . The accrued pension liability of $44 million and $74 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively is included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

The defined benefit pension plan contribution for 2013 is expected to be $18 million . The estimated net actuarial loss for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from AOCI into net benefit costs over the next year is $3 million .

Benefit payments were $37 million and $21 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Benefit payments for the year ended December 31, 2012 included $12 million related to the full settlement of a defined benefit plan. Expected future payments are as follows:

For the year ending December 31
(in millions of U.S dollars)
2013
$
21

2014
21

2015
23

2016
24

2017
22

2018-2022
127




F-64


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


14 . Other (income) expense

The following table presents the components of Other (income) expense as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations:
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Equity in net (income) loss of partially-owned entities
$
(80
)
 
$
(32
)
 
$
(75
)
Amortization of intangible assets
51

 
29

 
9

(Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets
(29
)
 
36

 

Federal excise and capital taxes
22

 
20

 
19

Acquisition-related costs
11

 
5

 
14

Other
19

 
23

 
23

Other (income) expense
$
(6
)
 
$
81

 
$
(10
)

Other (income) expense includes (Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets that do not qualify for separate account reporting under GAAP. The offsetting movement in the separate account liabilities is included in Policy benefits in the consolidated statements of operations. Refer to Note 1 i) for additional information. Equity in net (income) loss of partially-owned entities includes our share of net (income) loss related to investment funds, limited partnerships, partially-owned investment companies, and partially-owned insurance companies.  Certain federal excise and capital taxes incurred as a result of capital management initiatives are included in Other (income) expense in the consolidated statements of operations. As these are considered capital transactions, they are excluded from underwriting results.

15 . Segment information

ACE operates through the following business segments: Insurance – North American, Insurance – Overseas General, Global Reinsurance, and Life. These segments distribute their products through various forms of brokers, agencies, and direct marketing programs. All business segments have established relationships with reinsurance intermediaries.

The Insurance – North American segment comprises our operations in the U.S., Canada, and Bermuda. This segment includes the operations of ACE USA (including ACE Canada), ACE Commercial Risk Services, ACE Private Risk Services, ACE Westchester, ACE Agriculture, ACE Bermuda, and various run-off operations, including Brandywine. ACE USA is the North American retail operating division which provides a broad array of traditional and specialty P&C, A&H, and risk management products and services to a diverse group of commercial and non-commercial enterprises and consumers. ACE Commercial Risk Services addresses the insurance needs of small and mid-sized businesses in North America by delivering an array of specialty product solutions for targeted industries that lend themselves to technology-assisted underwriting. ACE Private Risk Services provides personal lines coverages for high net worth individuals and families in North America. ACE Westchester focuses on the North American wholesale distribution of excess and surplus lines property, casualty, environmental, professional liability and inland marine products. ACE Agriculture provides comprehensive Multiple Peril Crop Insurance, crop-hail and farm P&C insurance protection to customers in the U.S. and Canada through Rain and Hail as well as specialty P&C insurance coverages to Agribusiness customers through Penn Millers. ACE Bermuda provides commercial insurance products on an excess basis mainly to a global client base targeting Fortune 1000 companies and covering exposures that are generally low in frequency and high in severity. The run-off operations do not actively sell insurance products but are responsible for the management of certain existing policies and settlement of related claims.

The Insurance – Overseas General segment comprises ACE International, our global retail insurance operations, the wholesale insurance business of ACE Global Markets (AGM), and the international A&H business of Combined Insurance. ACE International is our retail business serving territories outside the U.S., Bermuda, and Canada, and maintains a presence in every major insurance market in the world and is organized geographically along product lines that provide dedicated underwriting focus to customers. ACE International has four regions of operations: ACE Europe, ACE Asia Pacific, ACE Far East, and ACE Latin America. Companies within the Insurance – Overseas General segment write a variety of insurance products including P&C, professional lines (directors and officers and errors and omissions), marine, energy, aviation, political risk, specialty consumer-oriented products, and A&H (principally accident and supplemental health). AGM, our London-based international specialty and excess and surplus lines business, includes Syndicate 2488, a wholly-owned ACE syndicate. AGM offers products through its parallel distribution network via ACE European Group Limited (AEGL) and Syndicate 2488. ACE provides



F-65


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


funds at Lloyd's to support underwriting by Syndicate 2488, which is managed by ACE Underwriting Agencies Limited. AGM uses Syndicate 2488 to underwrite P&C business on a global basis through Lloyd's worldwide licenses. AGM uses AEGL to underwrite similar classes of business through its network of U.K. and European licenses, and in the U.S. where it is eligible to write excess and surplus lines business. The reinsurance operation of AGM is included in the Global Reinsurance segment. Combined Insurance distributes a wide range of supplemental A&H products.

The Global Reinsurance segment represents ACE's reinsurance operations comprising ACE Tempest Re Bermuda, ACE Tempest Re USA, ACE Tempest Re International, and ACE Tempest Re Canada. The Global Reinsurance segment also includes AGM's reinsurance operations. These divisions provide a broad range of traditional and specialty reinsurance products including property catastrophe, casualty, and property reinsurance coverages to a diverse array of primary P&C insurers.

The Life segment includes ACE's international life operations (ACE Life), ACE Tempest Life Re (ACE Life Re), and the North American supplemental A&H and life business of Combined Insurance. ACE Life provides a broad portfolio of protection and savings products including whole life, endowment plans, individual term life, group term life, group medical, personal accident, credit life, universal life and unit linked contracts through multiple distribution channels primarily in emerging markets, including Egypt, Hong Kong, Indonesia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam; also throughout Latin America, selectively in Europe, and China through a non-consolidated joint venture insurance company. ACE Life Re helps clients (ceding companies) manage mortality, morbidity, and lapse risks embedded in their books of business. ACE Life Re's core business is a Bermuda-based operation which provides reinsurance to primary life insurers, focusing on guarantees included in certain fixed and variable annuity products and also on more traditional mortality reinsurance protection. ACE Life Re's U.S.-based traditional life reinsurance operation was discontinued for new business in January 2010 . Since 2007 , ACE Life Re has not quoted on new opportunities in the variable annuity reinsurance marketplace. Combined Insurance distributes specialty supplemental A&H and life insurance products targeted to middle income consumers, businesses, and students through educational institutions in the U.S. and Canada.

Corporate and Other (Corporate) includes ACE Limited, ACE Group Management and Holdings Ltd., ACE INA Holdings, Inc., and intercompany eliminations. Losses and loss expenses arise in connection with the commutation of ceded reinsurance contracts that result from a differential between the consideration received from reinsurers and the related reduction of reinsurance recoverable, principally related to the time value of money. Due to our initiatives to reduce reinsurance recoverable balances and thereby encourage such commutations, losses recognized in connection with the commutation of ceded reinsurance contracts are generally not considered when assessing segment performance and, accordingly, are directly allocated to Corporate. ACE also eliminates the impact of intersegment loss portfolio transfer transactions which are not reflected in the results within the statements of operations by segment.
For segment reporting purposes, certain items have been presented in a different manner than in the consolidated financial statements. Management uses underwriting income as the main measure of segment performance. ACE calculates underwriting income by subtracting Losses and loss expenses, Policy benefits, Policy acquisition costs, and Administrative expenses from Net premiums earned. For the Life business, management also includes Net investment income and (Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets that do not qualify for separate account reporting under GAAP as components of underwriting income. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2012 , Life underwriting income of $402 million includes Net investment income of $ 251 million and gains from fair value changes in separate account assets of $ 29 million.
Effective January 1, 2012, we reclassified prior years segment operating results in order to conform to certain organizational realignments.  These realignments resulted in a transfer of operating revenue and underwriting results of our international direct-marketed and credit life businesses from the Insurance – Overseas General segment to the Life segment. These realignments have no impact on consolidated operating results; however, prior years segment operating results contained in this report have been adjusted to conform to the current year presentation.


F-66


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following tables present the operations by segment:
Statement of Operations by Segment
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (in millions of U.S. dollars)
Insurance –
North
American

 
Insurance –
Overseas
General

 
Global
Reinsurance

 
Life

 
Corporate
and Other

 
ACE
Consolidated

Net premiums written
$
7,208

 
$
5,863

 
$
1,025

 
$
1,979

 
$

 
$
16,075

Net premiums earned
7,019

 
5,740

 
1,002

 
1,916

 

 
15,677

Losses and loss expenses
5,626

 
2,862

 
553

 
611

 
1

 
9,653

Policy benefits

 

 

 
521

 

 
521

Policy acquisition costs
586

 
1,353

 
172

 
334

 
1

 
2,446

Administrative expenses
601

 
935

 
51

 
328

 
181

 
2,096

Underwriting income (loss)
206

 
590

 
226

 
122

 
(183
)
 
961

Net investment income
1,091

 
521

 
290

 
251

 
28

 
2,181

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
42

 
103

 
6

 
(72
)
 
(1
)
 
78

Interest expense
12

 
5

 
4

 
12

 
217

 
250

Other (income) expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets

 

 

 
(29
)
 

 
(29
)
Other
(9
)
 
3

 
(15
)
 
25

 
19

 
23

Income tax expense (benefit)
200

 
133

 
15

 
58

 
(136
)
 
270

Net income (loss)
$
1,136

 
$
1,073

 
$
518

 
$
235

 
$
(256
)
 
$
2,706





F-67


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



 
Statement of Operations by Segment
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Insurance –
North
American

 
Insurance –
Overseas
General

 
Global
Reinsurance

 
Life

 
Corporate
and Other

 
ACE
Consolidated

Net premiums written
$
6,851

 
$
5,629

 
$
979

 
$
1,913

 
$

 
$
15,372

Net premiums earned
6,911

 
5,614

 
1,003

 
1,859

 

 
15,387

Losses and loss expenses
5,276

 
3,029

 
621

 
593

 
1

 
9,520

Policy benefits

 

 

 
401

 

 
401

Policy acquisition costs
612

 
1,335

 
185

 
339

 
1

 
2,472

Administrative expenses
592

 
939

 
52

 
317

 
168

 
2,068

Underwriting income (loss)
431

 
311

 
145

 
209

 
(170
)
 
926

Net investment income
1,170

 
546

 
287

 
226

 
13

 
2,242

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
34

 
33

 
(50
)
 
(806
)
 
(6
)
 
(795
)
Interest expense
15

 
5

 
2

 
11

 
217

 
250

Other (income) expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Gains) losses from fair value changes in separate account assets

 

 

 
36

 

 
36

Other
5

 

 
(1
)
 
26

 
15

 
45

Income tax expense (benefit)
395

 
164

 
30

 
50

 
(137
)
 
502

Net income (loss)
$
1,220

 
$
721

 
$
351

 
$
(494
)
 
$
(258
)
 
$
1,540


Statement of Operations by Segment
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Insurance –
North
American

 
Insurance –
Overseas
General

 
Global
Reinsurance

 
Life

 
Corporate
and Other

 
ACE
Consolidated

Net premiums written
$
5,797

 
$
5,189

 
$
1,075

 
$
1,647

 
$

 
$
13,708

Net premiums earned
5,651

 
5,153

 
1,071

 
1,629

 

 
13,504

Losses and loss expenses
3,918

 
2,615

 
518

 
528

 

 
7,579

Policy benefits

 

 

 
357

 

 
357

Policy acquisition costs
626

 
1,209

 
204

 
306

 

 
2,345

Administrative expenses
561

 
837

 
55

 
246

 
174

 
1,873

Underwriting income (loss)
546

 
492

 
294

 
192

 
(174
)
 
1,350

Net investment income
1,138

 
473

 
288

 
174

 
(3
)
 
2,070

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
417

 
123

 
93

 
(192
)
 
(9
)
 
432

Interest expense
9

 
1

 

 
3

 
211

 
224

Other (income) expense
(22
)
 
(13
)
 
(23
)
 
26

 
22

 
(10
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
435

 
171

 
42

 
59

 
(154)

 
553

Net income (loss)
$
1,679

 
$
929

 
$
656

 
$
86

 
$
(265
)
 
$
3,085

Underwriting assets are reviewed in total by management for purposes of decision-making. Other than goodwill, ACE does not allocate assets to its segments.


F-68


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following table presents net premiums earned for each segment by product:
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Property &
All Other

 
Casualty

 
Life,
Accident &
Health

 
ACE
Consolidated

For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insurance – North American
$
3,242

 
$
3,406

 
$
371

 
$
7,019

Insurance – Overseas General
2,236

 
1,379

 
2,125

 
5,740

Global Reinsurance
495

 
507

 

 
1,002

Life

 

 
1,916

 
1,916

 
$
5,973

 
$
5,292

 
$
4,412

 
$
15,677

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insurance – North American
$
3,174

 
$
3,380

 
$
357

 
$
6,911

Insurance – Overseas General
2,080

 
1,415

 
2,119

 
5,614

Global Reinsurance
458

 
545

 

 
1,003

Life

 

 
1,859

 
1,859

 
$
5,712

 
$
5,340

 
$
4,335

 
$
15,387

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insurance – North American
$
1,578

 
$
3,777

 
$
296

 
$
5,651

Insurance – Overseas General
1,800

 
1,424

 
1,929

 
5,153

Global Reinsurance
520

 
551

 

 
1,071

Life

 

 
1,629

 
1,629

 
$
3,898

 
$
5,752

 
$
3,854

 
$
13,504



The following table presents net premiums earned by geographic region. Allocations have been made on the basis of location of risk:
 
 
North America

 
 
 
Asia
 Pacific/Far East

 
Latin America

Years Ended
 
 
Europe

 
 
2012
 
60
%
 
17
%
 
16
%
 
7
%
2011
 
61
%
 
18
%
 
14
%
 
7
%
2010
 
61
%
 
20
%
 
13
%
 
6
%




F-69


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


16 . Earnings per share
As discussed in Note 1, the following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
 (in millions of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
2,706

 
$
1,540

 
$
3,085

Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator for basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average shares outstanding
339,843,438

 
338,159,409

 
339,685,143

Denominator for diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Share-based compensation plans
2,903,512

 
2,620,815

 
1,561,244

Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions
342,746,950

 
340,780,224

 
341,246,387

Basic earnings per share
$
7.96

 
$
4.55

 
$
9.08

Diluted earnings per share
$
7.89

 
$
4.52

 
$
9.04

Potential anti-dilutive share conversions
896,591

 
111,326

 
256,868


Excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years.

17 . Related party transactions

The ACE Foundation – Bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in Bermuda. The Trustees are principally ACE management. ACE maintains a non-interest bearing demand note receivable from the ACE Foundation – Bermuda (Borrower), the balance of which was $ 27 million and $ 29 million, at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The receivable is included in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The Borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in Bermuda real estate, some of which have been rented to ACE employees at rates established by independent, professional real estate appraisers. The Borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities. Accordingly, we report the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the Borrower to repay the loan, including the real estate properties.

18 . Statutory financial information

Our subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators. Statutory accounting differs from GAAP in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts, investments, subsidiaries, acquisition expenses, fixed assets, deferred income taxes, and certain other items. Our international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations. Some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements. In some countries, we must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business. These licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests. Jurisdictions may impose fines, censure, and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements.

ACE's insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate. These regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions, such as loans or cash advances, available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities. The amount of dividends available to be paid in 2013 without prior approval for our U.S. and International subsidiaries totals $ 762 million and $ 2.1 billion, respectively.

The statutory capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 .



F-70


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


The following tables present the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the U.S. and International subsidiaries:
 
 
 
 
 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
2012

 
2011

Statutory capital and surplus
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Subsidiaries
 
 
$
6,037

 
$
5,858

International Subsidiaries
 
 
$
18,317

 
$
15,565

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

 
2011

 
2010

Statutory net income
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Subsidiaries
$
619

 
$
702

 
$
1,025

International Subsidiaries
$
2,118

 
$
1,214

 
$
2,592


Several insurance subsidiaries follow accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the jurisdiction of domicile that differ from the applicable NAIC or local statutory practice. The application of prescribed or permitted accounting practices does not have a material impact on ACE's statutory surplus and income. As prescribed by the Restructuring discussed previously in Note 7 , certain of our U.S. subsidiaries discount certain A&E liabilities, which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 161 million and $ 192 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011 , respectively.




F-71


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


19 . Information provided in connection with outstanding debt of subsidiaries

The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 , and for the years ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 for ACE Limited (the Parent Guarantor) and ACE INA Holdings, Inc. (the Subsidiary Issuer). The Subsidiary Issuer is an indirect 100 percent-owned subsidiary of the Parent Guarantor. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the Parent Guarantor under the equity method for purposes of the supplemental consolidating presentation. Earnings of subsidiaries are reflected in the Parent Guarantor's investment accounts and earnings. The Parent Guarantor fully and unconditionally guarantees certain of the debt of the Subsidiary Issuer. Condensed consolidating financial information of the Subsidiary Issuer is presented on a consolidated basis and consists principally of the net assets, results of operations, and cash flows of operating insurance company subsidiaries.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
$
31

 
$
31,074

 
$
29,159

 
$

 
$
60,264

Cash (3)
103

 
515

 
(3
)
 

 
615

Insurance and reinsurance balances receivable

 
3,654

 
493

 

 
4,147

Reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses

 
17,232

 
(5,154
)
 

 
12,078

Reinsurance recoverable on policy benefits

 
1,187

 
(946
)
 

 
241

Value of business acquired

 
610

 
4

 

 
614

Goodwill and other intangible assets

 
4,419

 
556

 

 
4,975

Investments in subsidiaries
27,251

 

 

 
(27,251
)
 

Due from subsidiaries and affiliates, net
204

 

 

 
(204
)
 

Other assets
13

 
7,563

 
2,035

 

 
9,611

Total assets
$
27,602

 
$
66,254

 
$
26,144

 
$
(27,455
)
 
$
92,545

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unpaid losses and loss expenses
$

 
$
31,356

 
$
6,590

 
$

 
$
37,946

Unearned premiums

 
5,872

 
992

 

 
6,864

Future policy benefits

 
3,876

 
594

 

 
4,470

Due to (from) subsidiaries and affiliates, net

 
384

 
(180
)
 
(204
)
 

Short-term debt

 
851

 
550

 

 
1,401

Long-term debt

 
3,360

 

 

 
3,360

Trust preferred securities

 
309

 

 

 
309

Other liabilities
71

 
8,272

 
2,321

 

 
10,664

Total liabilities
71

 
54,280

 
10,867

 
(204
)
 
65,014

Total shareholders’ equity
27,531

 
11,974

 
15,277

 
(27,251
)
 
27,531

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
27,602

 
$
66,254

 
$
26,144

 
$
(27,455
)
 
$
92,545

(1)  
Includes all other subsidiaries of ACE Limited and intercompany eliminations.
(2)  
Includes ACE Limited parent company eliminations.
(3)  
ACE maintains two notional multi-currency cash pools (Pools) with a third-party bank. Refer to Note 1f) for additional information. At December 31, 2012 , the cash balance of one or more entities was negative; however, the overall Pool balances were positive.


F-72


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
$
33

 
$
28,848

 
$
26,795

 
$

 
$
55,676

Cash
106

 
382

 
126

 

 
614

Insurance and reinsurance balances receivable

 
3,944

 
443

 

 
4,387

Reinsurance recoverable on losses and loss expenses

 
17,146

 
(4,757
)
 

 
12,389

Reinsurance recoverable on policy benefits

 
941

 
(692
)
 

 
249

Value of business acquired

 
676

 

 

 
676

Goodwill and other intangible assets

 
4,248

 
551

 

 
4,799

Investments in subsidiaries
23,871

 

 

 
(23,871
)
 

Due from subsidiaries and affiliates, net
498

 

 

 
(498
)
 

Other assets
8

 
7,018

 
1,505

 

 
8,531

Total assets
$
24,516

 
$
63,203

 
$
23,971

 
$
(24,369
)
 
$
87,321

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unpaid losses and loss expenses
$

 
$
30,837

 
$
6,640

 
$

 
$
37,477

Unearned premiums

 
5,416

 
918

 

 
6,334

Future policy benefits

 
3,673

 
601

 

 
4,274

Due to subsidiaries and affiliates, net

 
316

 
182

 
(498
)
 

Short-term debt

 
850

 
401

 

 
1,251

Long-term debt

 
3,360

 

 

 
3,360

Trust preferred securities

 
309

 

 

 
309

Other liabilities
184

 
7,769

 
2,031

 

 
9,984

Total liabilities
184

 
52,530

 
10,773

 
(498
)
 
62,989

Total shareholders’ equity
24,332

 
10,673

 
13,198

 
(23,871
)
 
24,332

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
24,516

 
$
63,203

 
$
23,971

 
$
(24,369
)
 
$
87,321

(1)  
Includes all other subsidiaries of ACE Limited and intercompany eliminations.
(2)  
Includes ACE Limited parent company eliminations.



F-73


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Net premiums written
$

 
$
9,466

 
$
6,609

 
$

 
$
16,075

Net premiums earned

 
9,194

 
6,483

 

 
15,677

Net investment income
1

 
1,048

 
1,132

 

 
2,181

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
2,590

 

 

 
(2,590
)
 

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
17

 
121

 
(60
)
 

 
78

Losses and loss expenses

 
6,211

 
3,442

 

 
9,653

Policy benefits

 
309

 
212

 

 
521

Policy acquisition costs and administrative expenses
62

 
2,564

 
1,916

 

 
4,542

Interest (income) expense
(33
)
 
257

 
26

 

 
250

Other (income) expense
(137
)
 
77

 
54

 

 
(6
)
Income tax expense
10

 
193

 
67

 

 
270

Net income
$
2,706

 
$
752

 
$
1,838

 
$
(2,590
)
 
$
2,706

Comprehensive income
$
3,682

 
$
1,209

 
$
1,381

 
$
(2,590
)
 
$
3,682



Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Net premiums written
$

 
$
9,081

 
$
6,291

 
$

 
$
15,372

Net premiums earned

 
9,082

 
6,305

 

 
15,387

Net investment income
2

 
1,096

 
1,144

 

 
2,242

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
1,459

 

 

 
(1,459
)
 

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
(4
)
 
62

 
(853
)
 

 
(795
)
Losses and loss expenses

 
5,889

 
3,631

 

 
9,520

Policy benefits

 
192

 
209

 

 
401

Policy acquisition costs and administrative expenses
69

 
2,561

 
1,910

 

 
4,540

Interest (income) expense
(37
)
 
267

 
20

 

 
250

Other (income) expense
(125
)
 
143

 
63

 

 
81

Income tax expense
10

 
418

 
74

 

 
502

Net income
$
1,540

 
$
770

 
$
689

 
$
(1,459
)
 
$
1,540

Comprehensive income
$
1,857

 
$
1,077

 
$
382

 
$
(1,459
)
 
$
1,857

(1)  
Includes all other subsidiaries of ACE Limited and intercompany eliminations.
(2)  
Includes ACE Limited parent company eliminations.



F-74


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Net premiums written
$

 
$
8,195

 
$
5,513

 
$

 
$
13,708

Net premiums earned

 
7,940

 
5,564

 

 
13,504

Net investment income
1

 
1,011

 
1,058

 

 
2,070

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
3,043

 

 

 
(3,043
)
 

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
(42
)
 
303

 
171

 

 
432

Losses and loss expenses

 
4,910

 
2,669

 

 
7,579

Policy benefits

 
148

 
209

 

 
357

Policy acquisition costs and administrative expenses
70

 
2,395

 
1,753

 

 
4,218

Interest (income) expense
(37
)
 
251

 
10

 

 
224

Other (income) expense
(123
)
 
101

 
12

 

 
(10
)
Income tax expense
7

 
441

 
105

 

 
553

Net income
$
3,085

 
$
1,008

 
$
2,035

 
$
(3,043
)
 
$
3,085

Comprehensive income
$
3,856

 
$
1,271

 
$
1,772

 
$
(3,043
)
 
$
3,856

(1)  
Includes all other subsidiaries of ACE Limited and intercompany eliminations.
(2)  
Includes ACE Limited parent company eliminations.



F-75


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows  

For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Net cash flows from operating activities
$
781

 
$
1,744

 
$
1,920

 
$
(450
)
 
$
3,995

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of fixed maturities available for sale

 
(11,843
)
 
(12,001
)
 

 
(23,844
)
Purchases of fixed maturities held to maturity

 
(384
)
 
(4
)
 

 
(388
)
Purchases of equity securities

 
(70
)
 
(65
)
 

 
(135
)
Sales of fixed maturities available for sale

 
7,347

 
7,422

 

 
14,769

Sales of equity securities

 
59

 
60

 

 
119

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities available for sale

 
2,759

 
2,764

 

 
5,523

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities held to maturity

 
1,045

 
406

 

 
1,451

Net derivative instruments settlements
(1
)
 
(6
)
 
(274
)
 

 
(281
)
Capital contribution

 

 
(90
)
 
90

 

Advances from (to) affiliates
(2
)
 

 

 
2

 

Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired of $8)

 
(111
)
 
13

 

 
(98
)
Other

 
(395
)
 
(160
)
 

 
(555
)
Net cash flows used for investing activities
(3
)
 
(1,599
)
 
(1,929
)
 
92

 
(3,439
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends paid on Common Shares
(815
)
 

 

 

 
(815
)
Common Shares repurchased

 

 
(11
)
 

 
(11
)
Net proceeds from issuance of short-term debt

 
1

 
149

 

 
150

Proceeds from share-based compensation plans, including windfall tax benefits
34

 
13

 
79

 

 
126

Advances (to) from affiliates

 
(105
)
 
107

 
(2
)
 

Dividends to parent company

 

 
(450
)
 
450

 

Capital contribution

 
90

 

 
(90
)
 

Net cash flows used for financing activities
(781
)
 
(1
)
 
(126
)
 
358

 
(550
)
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 
(11
)
 
6

 

 
(5
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash
(3
)
 
133

 
(129
)
 

 
1

Cash – beginning of period
106

 
382

 
126

 

 
614

Cash – end of period (3)
$
103

 
$
515

 
$
(3
)
 
$

 
$
615

(1)
Includes all other subsidiaries of ACE Limited and intercompany eliminations.
(2)
Includes ACE Limited parent company eliminations and certain consolidating adjustments.
(3)
ACE maintains two notional multi-currency cash pools (Pools) with a third-party bank. Refer to Note 1 f) for additional information. At December 31, 2012 , the cash balance of one or more entities was negative; however, the overall Pool balances were positive.


F-76


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Net cash flows from operating activities
$
762

 
$
1,053

 
$
2,395

 
$
(740
)
 
$
3,470

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of fixed maturities available for sale

 
(12,203
)
 
(12,375
)
 

 
(24,578
)
Purchases of fixed maturities held to maturity

 
(338
)
 
(2
)
 

 
(340
)
Purchases of equity securities

 
(157
)
 
(152
)
 

 
(309
)
Sales of fixed maturities available for sale
9

 
9,718

 
8,244

 

 
17,971

Sales of equity securities

 
354

 
22

 

 
376

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities available for sale

 
1,784

 
1,936

 

 
3,720

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities held to maturity

 
933

 
346

 

 
1,279

Net derivative instruments settlements
(3
)
 
(24
)
 
(40
)
 

 
(67
)
Capital contribution
(385
)
 

 

 
385

 

Advances from (to) affiliates
41

 

 

 
(41
)
 

Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired of $91)

 
(569
)
 
(37
)
 

 
(606
)
Other

 
(420
)
 
(62
)
 

 
(482
)
Net cash flows used for investing activities
(338
)
 
(922
)
 
(2,120
)
 
344

 
(3,036
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends paid on Common Shares
(459
)
 

 

 

 
(459
)
Common Shares repurchased

 

 
(195
)
 

 
(195
)
Net proceeds from (repayments) issuance of short-term debt
(300
)
 
(150
)
 
400

 

 
(50
)
Proceeds from share-based compensation plans, including windfall tax benefits
133

 
3

 
3

 

 
139

Advances from (to) affiliates

 
(149
)
 
108

 
41

 

Dividends to parent company

 

 
(740
)
 
740

 

Capital contribution

 

 
385

 
(385
)
 

Net cash flows used for financing activities
(626
)
 
(296
)
 
(39
)
 
396

 
(565
)
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 
(26
)
 
(1
)
 

 
(27
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash
(202
)
 
(191
)
 
235

 

 
(158
)
Cash – beginning of period (3)
308

 
573

 
(109
)
 

 
772

Cash – end of period
$
106

 
$
382

 
$
126

 
$

 
$
614

(1)  
Includes all other subsidiaries of ACE Limited and intercompany eliminations.
(2)  
Includes ACE Limited parent company eliminations and certain consolidating adjustments.
(3)  
ACE maintains two notional multi-currency cash pools (Pools) with a third-party bank. Refer to Note 1 f) for additional information. At December 31, 2010 , the cash balance of one or more entities was negative; however, the overall Pool balances were positive.



F-77


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
ACE Limited
(Parent
Guarantor)

 
ACE INA
Holdings Inc.
(Subsidiary
Issuer)

 
Other ACE
Limited
Subsidiaries and
Eliminations (1)

 
Consolidating
Adjustments (2)

 
ACE Limited
Consolidated

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
Net cash flows from operating activities
$
(176
)
 
$
1,798

 
$
2,124

 
$
(200
)
 
$
3,546

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of fixed maturities available for sale
(1
)
 
(13,785
)
 
(17,470
)
 

 
(31,256
)
Purchases of fixed maturities held to maturity

 
(615
)
 
(1
)
 

 
(616
)
Purchases of equity securities

 
(107
)
 
(687
)
 

 
(794
)
Sales of fixed maturities available for sale

 
10,225

 
14,054

 

 
24,279

Sales of equity securities

 
17

 
757

 

 
774

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities available for sale

 
1,845

 
1,815

 

 
3,660

Maturities and redemptions of fixed maturities held to maturity

 
1,142

 
211

 

 
1,353

Net derivative instruments settlements
(3
)
 
(10
)
 
(96
)
 

 
(109
)
Capital contribution
(290
)
 

 

 
290

 

Advances from (to) affiliates
851

 

 

 
(851
)
 

Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash acquired of $80)

 
(1,139
)
 

 

 
(1,139
)
Other

 
(253
)
 
(80
)
 

 
(333
)
Net cash flows from (used for) investing activities
557

 
(2,680
)
 
(1,497
)
 
(561
)
 
(4,181
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends paid on Common Shares
(435
)
 

 

 

 
(435
)
Common Shares repurchased

 

 
(235
)
 

 
(235
)
Net proceeds from issuance of short-term debt
300

 
841

 

 

 
1,141

Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 
199

 

 

 
199

Proceeds from share-based compensation plans, including windfall tax benefits
63

 

 
(1
)
 

 
62

Advances from (to) affiliates

 
3

 
(854
)
 
851

 

Dividends to parent company

 

 
(200
)
 
200

 

Capital contribution

 

 
290

 
(290
)
 

Net cash flows from (used for) financing activities
(72
)
 
1,043

 
(1,000
)
 
761

 
732

Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 
12

 
(6
)
 

 
6

Net increase (decrease) in cash
309

 
173

 
(379
)
 

 
103

Cash – beginning of period (3)
(1
)
 
400

 
270

 

 
669

Cash – end of period (3)
$
308

 
$
573

 
$
(109
)
 
$

 
$
772

(1)  
Includes all other subsidiaries of ACE Limited and intercompany eliminations.
(2)  
Includes ACE Limited parent company eliminations and certain consolidating adjustments.
(3)  
ACE maintains two notional multi-currency cash pools (Pools) with a third-party bank. Refer to Note 1 f) for additional information. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the cash balance of one or more entities was negative; however, the overall Pool balances were positive.


F-78


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


20 . Condensed unaudited quarterly financial data
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
March 31

 
June 30

 
September 30

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
2012

 
2012

 
2012

 
2012

Net premiums earned
$
3,381

 
$
3,783

 
$
4,665

 
$
3,848

Net investment income
544

 
537

 
533

 
567

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
260

 
(394
)
 
(60
)
 
272

Total revenues
$
4,185

 
$
3,926

 
$
5,138

 
$
4,687

Losses and loss expenses
$
1,804

 
$
2,119

 
$
3,047

 
$
2,683

Policy benefits
$
147

 
$
102

 
$
130

 
$
142

Net income
$
973

 
$
328

 
$
640

 
$
765

Basic earnings per share
$
2.87

 
$
0.96

 
$
1.88

 
$
2.24

Diluted earnings per share
$
2.84

 
$
0.96

 
$
1.86

 
$
2.22

 
Three Months Ended
 
 
March 31

 
June 30

 
September 30

 
December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
2011

 
2011

 
2011

 
2011

Net premiums earned
$
3,309

 
$
3,757

 
$
4,490

 
$
3,831

Net investment income
544

 
569

 
564

 
565

Net realized gains (losses) including OTTI
(45
)
 
(73
)
 
(760
)
 
83

Total revenues
$
3,808

 
$
4,253

 
$
4,294

 
$
4,479

Losses and loss expenses
$
2,263

 
$
2,226

 
$
2,745

 
$
2,286

Policy benefits
$
91

 
$
108

 
$
83

 
$
119

Net income (loss)
$
250

 
$
594

 
$
(39
)
 
$
735

Basic earnings per share
$
0.74

 
$
1.75

 
$
(0.11
)
 
$
2.17

Diluted earnings per share
$
0.73

 
$
1.74

 
$
(0.11
)
 
$
2.15




F-79


SCHEDULE I
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS – OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES
December 31, 2012
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Cost or Amortized Cost

 
Fair Value

 
Amount at Which Shown in the Balance Sheet

Fixed maturities available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
$
3,553

 
$
3,735

 
$
3,735

Foreign
13,016

 
13,713

 
13,713

Corporate securities
15,529

 
16,708

 
16,708

Mortgage-backed securities
10,051

 
10,473

 
10,473

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
2,517

 
2,677

 
2,677

Total fixed maturities available for sale
44,666

 
47,306

 
47,306

Fixed maturities held to maturity
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and agency
1,044

 
1,083

 
1,044

Foreign
910

 
964

 
910

Corporate securities
2,133

 
2,275

 
2,133

Mortgage-backed securities
2,028

 
2,116

 
2,028

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
1,155

 
1,195

 
1,155

Total fixed maturities held to maturity
7,270

 
7,633

 
7,270

Equity securities
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial, miscellaneous, and all other
707

 
744

 
744

Short-term investments
2,228

 
2,228

 
2,228

Other investments
2,465

 
2,716

 
2,716

 
4,693

 
4,944

 
4,944

Total investments - other than investments in related parties
$
57,336

 
$
60,627

 
$
60,264





F-80


SCHEDULE II
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

BALANCE SHEETS (Parent Company Only)
 
 
 
December 31

December 31

(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

2011

Assets
 
 
Investments in subsidiaries and affiliates on equity basis
$
27,251

$
23,871

Short-term investments
1

1

Other investments, at cost
30

32

Total investments
27,282

23,904

Cash
103

106

Due from subsidiaries and affiliates, net
204

498

Other assets
13

8

Total assets
$
27,602

$
24,516

Liabilities
 
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
$
71

$
65

Dividends payable

119

Total liabilities
71

184

Shareholders' equity
 
 
Common Shares
9,591

10,095

Common Shares in treasury
(159
)
(327
)
Additional paid-in capital
5,179

5,326

Retained earnings
10,033

7,327

Accumulated other comprehensive income
2,887

1,911

Total shareholders' equity
27,531

24,332

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
$
27,602

$
24,516

 
 
 
 
 
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
 
 
 



F-81


SCHEDULE II (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Parent Company Only)


 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012

2011

2010

Revenues
 
 
 
Investment income, including intercompany interest income
$
34

$
39

$
38

Equity in net income of subsidiaries and affiliates
2,590

1,459

3,043

Net realized gains (losses)
17

(4
)
(42
)
 
 
2,641

1,494

3,039

Expenses
 
 
 
Administrative and other (income) expense
(75
)
(56
)
(53
)
Income tax expense
10

10

7

 
 
(65
)
(46
)
(46
)
Net income
$
2,706

$
1,540

$
3,085

Comprehensive income
 
$
3,682

$
1,857

$
3,856

 
 
 
 
 
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
 
 


F-82


SCHEDULE II (continued)
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries


CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Parent Company Only)

 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
2010
 
Net cash flows from (used for) operating activities
 
$
781

 
 
$
762

 
 
$
(176
)
Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of fixed maturities available for sale
 

 
 

 
 
(1)

Sales of fixed maturities available for sale
 

 
 
9

 
 

Net derivative instruments settlements
 
(1
)
 
 
(3
)
 
 
(3)

Capital contribution to subsidiary
 

 
 
(385
)
 
 
(290
)
Advances (to) from affiliates
 
(2
)
 
 
41

 
 
851

Net cash flows from (used for) investing activities
 
(3
)
 
 
(338
)
 
 
557

Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends paid on Common Shares
 
(815
)
 
 
(459
)
 
 
(435
)
Net proceeds from issuance (repayment) of short-term debt
 

 
 
(300
)
 
 
300

Proceeds from share-based compensation plans
 
34

 
 
133

 
 
63

Net cash flows used for financing activities
 
(781
)
 
 
(626
)
 
 
(72
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash
 
(3
)
 
 
(202
)
 
 
309

Cash - beginning of year
 
106

 
 
308

 
 
(1
)
Cash - end of year
 
$
103

 
 
$
106

 
 
$
308

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.





F-83


SCHEDULE IV
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CONCERNING REINSURANCE

Premiums Earned
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 (in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
 
Direct Amount

 
Ceded To Other Companies

 
Assumed From Other Companies

 
Net Amount

 
Percentage of Amount Assumed to Net

2012
 
$
17,802

 
$
5,427

 
$
3,302

 
$
15,677

 
21
%
2011
 
$
17,534

 
$
5,496

 
$
3,349

 
$
15,387

 
22
%
2010
 
$
15,780

 
$
5,792

 
$
3,516

 
$
13,504

 
26
%




F-84


SCHEDULE VI
ACE Limited and Subsidiaries



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION CONCERNING PROPERTY AND CASUALTY OPERATIONS

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 (in millions of U.S. dollars)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Losses and Loss Expenses Incurred Related to
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
 
 
Net Reserves for Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses

 
Unearned Premiums

 
Net Premiums Earned

 
Net Investment Income

 
Current Year

 
Prior Year

 
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

 
Net Paid Losses and Loss Expenses

 
Net Premiums Written

2012
 
$
1,757
 
 
$
26,547

 
$
6,864

 
$
14,764

 
$
2,018

 
$
10,132

 
$
(479
)
 
$
2,254

 
$
9,219

 
$
15,107

2011
 
$
1,512
 
 
$
25,875

 
$
6,334

 
$
14,523

 
$
2,107

 
$
10,076

 
$
(556
)
 
$
2,291

 
$
8,866

 
$
14,455

2010
 
$
1,435
 
 
$
25,242

 
$
6,330

 
$
12,893

 
$
1,994

 
$
8,082

 
$
(503
)
 
$
2,216

 
$
7,413

 
$
13,075





F-85
Exhibit 10.5

EXECUTION COPY

FIRST AMENDMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of November 21, 2012 (this “ Amendment ”) amends the Facility Agreement dated as of November 18, 2010 (the “ Agreement ”, and as amended by this Amendment, the “ Amended Agreement ”) between ACE Limited and Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth below;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1 Amendments . Upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , the Agreement shall be amended as follows:
1.1     Amendments to Definitions .
(a)    The definition of Availability Termination Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2014” and substituting the date “December 31, 2016” therefor.
(b)    The following new definitions are added in appropriate alphabetical order:
Change in Law ” means the occurrence, after the date of the Agreement, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any governmental authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any governmental authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, adopted or issued.
First Amendment ” means the First Amendment to this Agreement dated as of November 21, 2012 between ACE and the Bank.
Public Debt Rating ” means, as of any date, the higher rating that has been most recently announced by either S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, as ACE’s long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent); provided that if at any time the difference between the ratings of such type most recently announced by S&P and Moody’s is more than one rating grade, the Public Debt Rating shall be the rating that is one grade below the higher of such two ratings. For purposes of the foregoing, (a) if only one of S&P and Moody’s shall have in effect a long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent) for ACE, the Public Debt Rating shall be the available rating; (b) if any rating established by S&P or Moody’s shall be changed, such change shall be effective for purposes of this Agreement as of ten Business Days following the date on which such change is first announced publicly by the rating agency making such change; and (c) if S&P or Moody’s shall change the basis on which ratings are established, each reference herein to ratings announced by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, shall refer to the then equivalent rating by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be.
(c)    The definition of “Guidelines” is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Guidelines ” means, collectively, guideline S-02.123 in relation to interbank loans of 22 September 1986 ( Merkblatt Verrechnungssteuer auf Zinsen von Bankguthaben, deren

    


Gläubiger Banken sind (Interbankguthaben) vom 22. September 1986 ), guideline S-02.122.1 in relation to bonds of April 1999 ( Merkblatt Obligationen vom April 1999 ), guideline S-02.130.1 in relation to money market instruments and accounts receivable of April 1999 ( Merkblatt vom April 1999 betreffend Geldmarktpapiere und Buchforderungen inländischer Schuldner ), guideline S-02.128 in relation to syndicated credit facilities of January 2000 ( Merkblatt Steuerliche Behandlung von Konsortialdarlehen, Schuldscheindarlehen, Wechseln und Unterbeteiligungen vom Januar 2000 ), circular letter no. 34 in relation to customer credit balances of 26 July 2011 ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 34 vom 26. Juli 2011 betreffend Kundenguthaben ”) and the circular letter No. 15 of 7 February 2007 (1-015-DVS-2007) in relation to bonds and derivative financial instruments as subject matter of taxation of Swiss federal income tax, Swiss withholding tax and Swiss stamp taxes ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 15 Obligationen und derivative Finanzinstrumente als Gegenstand der direkten Bundessteuer, der Verrechnungssteuer und der Stempelabgaben vom 7. Februar 2007 ), in each case as issued, amended or replaced from time to time, by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration or as substituted or superseded and overruled by any law, statute, ordinance, court decision, regulation or the like as in force from time to time.
(d)    The definition of EURIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “EURIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “EURIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(e)    The definition of Existing FAL Facility Agreement is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting the words “certain Subsidiaries of ACE” therefor.
(f)    The definition of Final Expiration Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2015” and substituting the date “December 31, 2017” therefor.
(g)    The definition of LIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “LIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “LIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(h)    The definition of Loan Documents is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantee,” and substituting the words “the First Amendment” therefor.
(i)    After giving effect to the amendments set forth in Section 1.1(e) and (h) above, the definitions of Loan Party, Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor are deleted in their entirety.
(j)    Clause (c) of the definition of Material Adverse Effect is amended to read as follows: “the ability of ACE to perform its obligations under the Loan Documents.”
(k)    The definition of Reimbursement Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Reimbursement Agreement ” means the Credit Agreement dated as of November 6, 2012 among ACE, various subsidiaries thereof, various financial institutions and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, as such Agreement is in effect on the date hereof, without giving effect to (a) any amendment or other modification thereto or waiver thereunder unless the Bank has agreed to such amendment, modification or waiver (in which case such amendment, modification or waiver shall automatically become effective hereunder, mutatis mutandis ) or (b) any termination thereof.

- 2 -


1.2     Deletion of Definition of Loan Party . To give effect to the deletion of the term “Loan Party”, (a) all references in the Agreement to “Loan Party” or “Loan Parties” shall be deemed to be references to “ACE” and (b) all other appropriate grammatical changes shall be deemed to have been made. For example, (i) Section 4.14 is amended by deleting the words “no Loan Party is” and substituting “ACE is not” therefor; and (ii) Section 6.01(m) is amended by deleting the words “the Loan Parties are” and substituting “ACE is” therefor.
1.3     Deletion of Definitions of Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor . To give effect to the deletion of the terms “Subsidiary Guarantee” and “Subsidiary Guarantor”:
(a)    Exhibit A is deleted in its entirety.
(b)    Section 4.03 is amended by deleting the language “each of ACE and the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting “ACE” therefor.
(c)    Section 4.04 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Enforceability . This Agreement has been, and each other LOC Related Document to which ACE is a party has been or when delivered hereunder will have been, duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Agreement is, and each Collateral Document and each LOC Application is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms.
(d)    Section 6.01(c)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(i) ACE shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 6.01(d), 6.02, 6.03(a) or 6.04 of the Reimbursement Agreement as incorporated herein by reference;
(e)    Section 6.01(f) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Any Supported Member or the Managing Agent shall cease to be a Wholly-owned Subsidiary of ACE;
(f)    Section 6.01(k) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.4     Minimum Interest Rates . Section 2.03(d)(ii) is amended by deleting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE, the payment of interest due by ACE” and substituting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE and it is unlawful for any reason for ACE to comply with Section 2.09 , the payment of interest due by ACE” therefor.
1.5     Fee Rate Changes . Each of Section 2.05(b) and 2.06(b) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.6     Increased Costs Provisions .
(a)    Section 2.07(a) is amended by deleting the words “If, due to (i) the introduction of or any change in or in the interpretation of, in each case after the date hereof, any law or regulation, (ii) compliance with any guideline or request issued after the date hereof by any central bank or other governmental authority (whether or not having the force of law) or (iii)” therein and substituting the words “If, due to (i) any Change in Law or (ii)” therefor.
(b)    Section 2.07(b) is amended by (x) deleting the words “If, due to (i) the introduction of or any change in or in the interpretation of any law or regulation, in each case after the date hereof, (ii) compliance with any guideline or request issued after the date hereof from any central bank or other governmental authority (whether or not having the force of law) or (iii)” and substituting the words “If, due to (i) any Change in Law or

- 3 -


(ii)” therefor; (y) deleting the words “increase in the amount of capital required or expected” therein and substituting the words “increase in the amount of capital or liquidity required or expected” therefor; and (z) deleting the words “such increase in capital to be allocable” therein and substituting the words “such increase in capital or liquidity to be allocable” therefor.
(c)    Section 2.07(d) is amended by adding the following words immediately before the period at the end thereof:
(except that, if the Change in Law giving rise to compensation is retroactive, then the 120 days shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof).
1.7     Collateral Provisions . Section 2.11 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
2.11     Collateralization of LOCs .
(a)     Voluntary Collateralization . ACE may at any time provide Collateral to secure any LOC (in which case the pricing applicable to such LOC shall be adjusted as set forth on Schedule I ). If at any time the Collateral Value of all Collateral so provided is less than the aggregate Stated Amount of all Secured LOCs, then ACE shall designate from time to time the LOCs that are deemed to be Secured LOCs or provide additional Collateral in an amount sufficient to cause the Collateral Value to equal or exceed such aggregate Stated Amount.
(b)     Collateralization upon Downgrade . If at any time the Public Debt Rating of ACE falls below BBB+ by S&P and below Baa1 by Moody’s, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with an aggregate Collateral Value not less than the Stated Amount of all outstanding LOCs (and all LOCs shall be deemed to be Secured LOCs).
(c)     Collateralization due to Currency Fluctuations . If as of any Revaluation Date the Stated Amount of all LOCs exceeds the Commitment Amount, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to or greater than such excess.
(d)     Collateralization Upon Non-Renewal . If the Bank notifies ACE that the Bank will not extend the final expiration date of any Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 as provided in Section 7.19 , then ACE shall, on or before the later of December 31, 2014 and 90 days after receipt by ACE of such notice, either (i) cause all Lloyd’s LOCs to be terminated and returned to the Bank or (ii) provide to, and thereafter maintain, Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of all outstanding Lloyd’s LOCs.
(e)     Releases of Collateral . If ACE has provided Collateral pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.11 and no Default exists, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by ACE, (i) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (a) , (ii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (b) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s, (iii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (c) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that after giving effect to such release, the Stated Amount of all LOCs will not exceed the Commitment Amount and (iv) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (d) so long as after giving effect to such release, ACE is in compliance with the Collateralization requirements of such clause (d) . In each of the foregoing cases, the Bank agrees to promptly deliver instructions and/or entitlement orders to the Custodian under the Control Agreement directing the Custodian to release such Collateral.

- 4 -


(f)     Release of Security Interest . If the Commitment has terminated, no LOCs are outstanding and all liabilities owing to the Bank (other than contingent indemnity liabilities hereunder) have been paid or discharged in full, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by (and at the expense of) ACE, take all actions reasonably requested by ACE to terminate the Security Agreement and the Control Agreement, any security interest arising thereunder and any Uniform Commercial Code filings made in connection therewith.
(g)     Collateralization on Final Expiration Date . If any LOC remains outstanding after the Final Expiration Date, ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of such LOC.
1.8     References to Reimbursement Agreement . To properly reflect the provisions in the Reimbursement Agreement that are incorporated by reference into the Agreement:
(a)    Section 4.11 is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 4.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” and substituting “Section 5.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” therefor.
(b)    Section 5.08 is amended by deleting the reference to “Article V” and substituting “Article VI” therefor.
(c)    Section 6.01(h) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” therefor.
(d)    Section 6.01(i) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f)” therefor.
1.9     Ongoing Conditions . The parenthetical clause at the end of Section 3.02(a)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
( provided that the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.06(i) and Section 4.07 shall be excluded from this clause (i) )
1.10     Financials . Section 4.07 is amended by (a) deleting each reference to “December 31, 2009” and substituting “December 31, 2011” therefor and (b) deleting each reference to “June 30, 2010” and substituting “June 30, 2012” therefor.
1.11     Minimum Primary FAL . Section 5.04(b) is amended by deleting the amount “$100,000,000” therein and substituting “$200,000,000” therefor.
1.12     Restrictions on Supported Members . Section 5.05 is amended by renumbering the second subsection “(a)” as subsection “(b)”.
1.13     Participation; Sub-participation . Section 7.07 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
7.07     Participation; Sub-participation . Notwithstanding Section 7.06 , the Bank shall be entitled to enter into a participation, sub-participation or any other arrangement with any other Qualifying Bank under which that Qualifying Bank will make payment to the Bank in the event of any LOC Disbursement; provided that (a) the Bank shall give notice thereof to ACE, (b) no such bank or other Person shall have any rights hereunder, (c) ACE shall continue to deal solely and directly with the Bank and (d) the proposed participant, sub-participant or Person pursuant to any other arrangement has delivered a certificate to the Bank and ACE confirming that it is a Qualifying Bank. Any other participation, sub-participation or other arrangement is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of ACE.

- 5 -


1.14     Notification of Non-Renewal . The following new Section 7.19 is added in appropriate numerical sequence:
7.19 Notification by Bank . The Bank will use reasonable commercial efforts to notify ACE promptly upon any determination by the Bank that it will not extend the final expiration date of any Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 (it being understood that failure to provide such notice shall not impose any liability on the Bank).
1.15     Pricing Schedule . Schedule I is amended in its entirety by substituting the Schedule I attached hereto therefor.
SECTION 2     Representations and Warranties; No Defaults; Enforceability . ACE represents and warrants to the Bank that:
2.1     Representations and Warranties in the Agreement; No Defaults . (a) The representations and warranties set forth in Article IV of the Amended Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Amendment, as though made on and as of such date, other than any such representation or warranty that, by its terms, refers to a specific earlier date, in which case as of such specific date; (b) as of the date of this Amendment (and after giving effect hereto), no Default or Event of Default exists; and (c) as of the date hereof, ACE is a company incorporated in Switzerland with its registered office at Bärengasse 32, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
2.2     Enforceability . This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Amendment is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms, except as affected by (a) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and other similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and/or (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity) (collectively, “ Debtor Relief Laws ”).
SECTION 3     Effectiveness . This Amendment shall become effective on the date on which the Bank has received all of the following:
3.1     Amendment . A counterpart of this Amendment signed by ACE.
3.2     Upfront Fee . An upfront fee in the amount separately agreed between ACE and the Bank payable pursuant to the Fee Letter dated as of the date hereof between ACE and the Bank.
3.3     Closing Certificate . A certificate of a Responsible Officer of ACE (a) stating that each other bank that is a party to the FAL Providers’ Agreement has (i) entered into, or is concurrently entering into, an amendment to its facility agreement so that the representations and warranties, covenants and defaults in its facility agreement are substantially the same as the corresponding provisions of the Agreement as amended hereby and (ii) released, or is concurrently releasing, the subsidiary guaranty originally granted under its facility agreement; (b) certifying that, as of the date of this Amendment, ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s; and (c) certifying as to the matters set forth in Section 2.1(a) and (b) .
3.4     Authority Evidence . Certified copies of the resolutions of the Board of Directors of ACE approving the transactions contemplated by this Amendment.
3.5     Secretary’s Certificate . A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of ACE certifying that the names and true signatures of the officers of ACE that were authorized to sign the Loan Documents as of the Closing Date of the Agreement remain in full force and effect as of the date of this Amendment.

- 6 -


3.6     Organizational Documents . Copies of the articles or certificate of formation (or similar charter document) and the bylaws (or similar governing documents), if any, of ACE as in effect on the date of this Amendment, certified by a duly authorized representative of ACE as of the date of this Amendment.
3.7     Legal Opinions . Favorable opinions of (a) Niederer Kraft & Frey AG, Swiss counsel for ACE and (b) Mayer Brown International LLP, English counsel for ACE, each in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Bank.
SECTION 4     Release of Subsidiary Guarantors . The Bank agrees that upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , (a) the Subsidiary Guarantors shall be released from all of their obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee and (b) the Subsidiary Guarantee shall be of no further force or effect.
SECTION 5     Miscellaneous .
5.1     Continuing Effectiveness, etc. (a) Except to the extent expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and conditions of each of the Agreement, each LOC Application, the Security Agreement, the Control Agreement and the FAL Providers’ Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. ACE affirms that after giving effect to this Amendment, the Agreement, as modified hereby, and each other Loan Document to which ACE is a party will remain in full force and effect and will continue to constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms except insofar as such enforcement may be limited by Debtor Relief Laws.
(b)    After the effectiveness of this Amendment, all references in the Agreement and the other Loan Documents to the “Facility Agreement” or similar terms shall refer to the Amended Agreement.
5.2     Costs and Expenses . Each party hereto agrees to pay its own expenses in connection with the negotiation, execution and delivery of this Amendment.
5.3     Incorporation by Reference. The provisions of Sections 7.11 ( Third Party Rights ), 7.12 ( Execution in Counterparts ) and 7.16(a) and (b) ( Jurisdiction, etc. ) of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference, mutatis mutandis .

5.4     Governing Law . This Amendment and all non-contractual obligations arising in any way whatsoever out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by, construed and take effect in accordance with, English law.

[Signature Pages Follow]



- 7 -


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.
ACE LIMITED



By:________________________________________________
Name: Paul Medini
Title: Chief Accounting Officer



By:________________________________________________
Name: Philip Bancroft
Title: Chief Financial Officer    


Signature Page to ACE Limited / Lloyds TSB Facility Agreement Amendment


LLOYDS TSB BANK PLC



By:________________________________________________
Name:_____________________________________________
Title:_______________________________________________



Signature Page to ACE Limited / Lloyds TSB Facility Agreement Amendment


SCHEDULE I

Pricing Schedule

Subject to the remaining provisions of this Schedule I , the “Commitment Fee Rate” and the “LOC Commission Rate” shall equal the applicable rate determined in accordance with the pricing grid set forth below.
The rates with respect to the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate will be determined according to the following grid based upon ACE’s Public Debt Rating; provided that if ACE does not have a Public Debt Rating, the rates listed in Level V will apply.
Level
S&P/Moody’s Rating
Commitment Fee
Rate *
LOC Commission
Rate *
I
A+/A1 or above
0.30%
0.90%
II
A/A2
0.30%
1.00%
III
A-/A3
0.35%
1.10%
IV
BBB+/Baa1
0.35%
1.30%
V
BBB/Baa2 or below
0.40%
1.50%
* Percentage per annum.
If ACE has provided Collateral, then the LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs will be reduced to (a) 0.40% of the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; and (b) 0.50% of the Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; provided that such rates will increase to 0.60% and 0.70%,respectively, during the existence of an Event of Default. The LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs shall be determined in accordance with the pricing grid above.
The “ Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of the Collateral. The “ Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in the form of cash held with the Bank or any Custodian. The “ Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the lesser of (a) the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in a form other than cash held with the Bank or any Custodian and (b) the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs. The “ Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs.
Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Schedule I to the contrary, if at any time the difference between the Moody’s and S&P’s ratings is more than one rating grade, then for purposes of determining the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate at such time, the rating level one level below the higher rating will apply.

Sch. I
Exhibit 10.7

EXECUTION COPY

FIRST AMENDMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of November 21, 2012 (this “ Amendment ”) amends the Facility Agreement dated as of November 18, 2010 (the “ Agreement ”, and as amended by this Amendment, the “ Amended Agreement ”) between ACE Limited and ING Bank N.V., London Branch. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth below;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1 Amendments . Upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , the Agreement shall be amended as follows:
1.1     Amendments to Definitions .
(a)    The definition of Availability Termination Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2014” and substituting the date “December 31, 2016” therefor.
(b)    The following new definitions are added in appropriate alphabetical order:
Change in Law ” means the occurrence, after the date of the Agreement, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any governmental authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any governmental authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, adopted or issued.
First Amendment ” means the First Amendment to this Agreement dated as of November 21, 2012 between ACE and the Bank.
Public Debt Rating ” means, as of any date, the higher rating that has been most recently announced by either S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, as ACE’s long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent); provided that if at any time the difference between the ratings of such type most recently announced by S&P and Moody’s is more than one rating grade, the Public Debt Rating shall be the rating that is one grade below the higher of such two ratings. For purposes of the foregoing, (a) if only one of S&P and Moody’s shall have in effect a long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent) for ACE, the Public Debt Rating shall be the available rating; (b) if any rating established by S&P or Moody’s shall be changed, such change shall be effective for purposes of this Agreement as of ten Business Days following the date on which such change is first announced publicly by the rating agency making such change; and (c) if S&P or Moody’s shall change the basis on which ratings are established, each reference herein to ratings announced by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, shall refer to the then equivalent rating by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be.
(c)    The definition of “Guidelines” is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Guidelines ” means, collectively, guideline S-02.123 in relation to interbank loans of 22 September 1986 ( Merkblatt “Verrechnungssteuer auf Zinsen von Bankguthaben, deren Gläubiger Banken sind (Interbankguthaben)” vom 22. September 1986 ), guideline S-02.122.1 in relation to bonds of April 1999 ( Merkblatt “Obligationen” vom April 1999 ), guideline S-02.130.1 in relation to money

    


market instruments and accounts receivable of April 1999 ( Merkblatt vom April 1999 betreffend Geldmarktpapiere und Buchforderungen inländischer Schuldner ), guideline S-02.128 in relation to syndicated credit facilities of January 2000 ( Merkblatt “Steuerliche Behandlung von Konsortialdarlehen, Schuldscheindarlehen, Wechseln und Unterbeteiligungen” vom Januar 2000 ), circular letter no. 34 in relation to customer credit balances of 26 July 2011 ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 34 vom 26. Juli 2011 betreffend “Kundenguthaben” ) and the circular letter No. 15 of 7 February 2007 (1-015-DVS-2007) in relation to bonds and derivative financial instruments as subject matter of taxation of Swiss federal income tax, Swiss withholding tax and Swiss stamp taxes ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 15 “Obligationen und derivative Finanzinstrumente als Gegenstand der direkten Bundessteuer, der Verrechnungssteuer und der Stempelabgaben” vom 7. Februar 2007 ), in each case as issued, amended or replaced from time to time, by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration or as substituted or superseded and overruled by any law, statute, ordinance, court decision, regulation or the like as in force from time to time.
(d)    The definition of EURIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “EURIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “EURIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(e)    The definition of Existing FAL Facility Agreement is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting the words “certain Subsidiaries of ACE” therefor.
(f)    The definition of Final Expiration Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2015” and substituting the date “December 31, 2017” therefor.
(g)    The definition of LIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “LIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “LIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(h)    The definition of Loan Documents is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantee,” and substituting the words “the First Amendment” therefor.
(i)    After giving effect to the amendments set forth in Section 1.1(e) and (h) above, the definitions of Loan Party, Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor are deleted in their entirety.
(j)    Clause (c) of the definition of Material Adverse Effect is amended to read as follows: “the ability of ACE to perform its obligations under the Loan Documents.”
(k)    The definition of Reimbursement Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Reimbursement Agreement ” means the Credit Agreement dated as of November 6, 2012 among ACE, various subsidiaries thereof, various financial institutions and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, as such Agreement is in effect on the date hereof, without giving effect to (a) any amendment or other modification thereto or waiver thereunder unless the Bank has agreed to such amendment, modification or waiver (in which case such amendment, modification or waiver shall automatically become effective hereunder, mutatis mutandis ) or (b) any termination thereof.
1.2     Deletion of Definition of Loan Party . To give effect to the deletion of the term “Loan Party”, (a) all references in the Agreement to “Loan Party” or “Loan Parties” shall be deemed to be references to “ACE” and (b) all other appropriate grammatical changes shall be deemed to have been made. For example, (i) Section 4.14 is amended by deleting

- 2 -


the words “no Loan Party is” and substituting “ACE is not” therefor; and (ii) Section 6.01(m) is amended by deleting the words “the Loan Parties are” and substituting “ACE is” therefor.
1.3     Deletion of Definitions of Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor . To give effect to the deletion of the terms “Subsidiary Guarantee” and “Subsidiary Guarantor”:
(a)    Exhibit A is deleted in its entirety.
(b)    Section 4.03 is amended by deleting the language “each of ACE and the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting “ACE” therefor.
(c)    Section 4.04 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Enforceability . This Agreement has been, and each other LOC Related Document to which ACE is a party has been or when delivered hereunder will have been, duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Agreement is, and each Collateral Document and each LOC Application is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms.
(d)    Section 6.01(c)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(i) ACE shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 6.01(d), 6.02, 6.03(a) or 6.04 of the Reimbursement Agreement as incorporated herein by reference;
(e)    Section 6.01(f) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Any Supported Member or the Managing Agent shall cease to be a Wholly-owned Subsidiary of ACE;
(f)    Section 6.01(k) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.4     Minimum Interest Rates . Section 2.03(d)(ii) is amended by deleting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE, the payment of interest due by ACE” and substituting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE and it is unlawful for any reason for ACE to comply with Section 2.09 , the payment of interest due by ACE” therefor.
1.5     Refunds of Increased Costs . Section 2.03(e) is amended by deleting the words “be materially disadvantageous to the Bank” therein and substituting the words “be disadvantageous to the Bank” therefor.
1.6     Fee Rate Changes . Each of Section 2.05(b) and 2.06(b) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.7     Increased Costs Provisions .
(a)    Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 2.07 are amended in their entirety to read as follows:
(a) If, due to (i) any Change in Law or (ii) the introduction of or changeover to the Euro in any participating member state occurring after the date hereof, there shall be any increase in the cost to the Bank of agreeing to issue or of issuing or maintaining LOCs or the making of Advances (excluding, for purposes of this Section 2.07 , any such increased costs resulting from (x) Taxes or Other Taxes (as to which Section 2.09 shall govern) and (y) changes in the basis of taxation of overall net income or overall gross income (or franchise taxes in lieu thereof) by the United States or by the foreign jurisdiction or state under the laws of which the Bank is organized or has its Lending Office or any political subdivision thereof), then ACE agrees to pay to the Bank, from time to time within five Business Days after demand by the Bank (which demand shall set forth the amount demanded and include a statement

- 3 -


of the basis for such demand), additional amounts sufficient to compensate the Bank for such increased cost. The Bank shall use reasonable commercial efforts to provide to ACE, concurrently with any demand pursuant to the foregoing sentence, a statement setting forth in reasonable detail a calculation of the amount demanded (it being understood that failure to provide such calculation shall not release ACE of its obligation to reimburse the Bank for the requested increased cost arising under this Section 2.07(a)) . A certificate as to the amount of such increased cost, submitted to ACE by the Bank, shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent demonstrable error.
(b) If, due to (i) any Change in Law or (ii) the introduction of or changeover to the Euro in any participating member state occurring after the date hereof, there shall be any increase in the amount of capital or liquidity required or expected to be maintained by the Bank or any Affiliate thereof as a result of or based upon the existence of the Commitment and other commitments of such type, then ACE agrees to pay to the Bank (or, if requested by the Bank, such Affiliate), from time to time within five Business Days after demand by the Bank (which demand shall set forth the amount demanded and include a statement of the basis for such demand), additional amounts sufficient to compensate the Bank or such Affiliate in the light of such circumstances, to the extent that the Bank or such Affiliate reasonably determines such increase in capital or liquidity to be allocable to the existence of the Commitment. The Bank shall use reasonable commercial efforts to provide to ACE, concurrently with any demand pursuant to the foregoing sentence, a statement setting forth in reasonable detail a calculation of the amount demanded (it being understood that failure to provide such calculation shall not release ACE of its obligation to reimburse the Bank for the requested increased cost arising under this Section 2.07(b) ). A certificate as to such amounts submitted to ACE by the Bank shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent demonstrable error.
(b)    Section 2.07(d) is amended by adding the following words immediately before the period at the end thereof: “(except that, if the Change in Law giving rise to compensation is retroactive, then the 120 days shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof)”.
1.8     Collateral Provisions . Section 2.11 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
2.11     Collateralization of LOCs .
(a)     Voluntary Collateralization . ACE may at any time provide Collateral to secure any LOC (in which case the pricing applicable to such LOC shall be adjusted as set forth on Schedule I ). If at any time the Collateral Value of all Collateral so provided is less than the aggregate Stated Amount of all Secured LOCs, then ACE shall designate from time to time the LOCs that are deemed to be Secured LOCs or provide additional Collateral in an amount sufficient to cause the Collateral Value to equal or exceed such aggregate Stated Amount.
(b)     Collateralization upon Downgrade . If at any time the Public Debt Rating of ACE falls below BBB+ by S&P and below Baa1 by Moody’s, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with an aggregate Collateral Value not less than the Stated Amount of all outstanding LOCs (and all LOCs shall be deemed to be Secured LOCs).
(c)     Collateralization due to Currency Fluctuations . If as of any Revaluation Date the Stated Amount of all LOCs exceeds the Commitment Amount, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to or greater than such excess.
(d)     Collateralization Upon Non-Renewal . If the Bank notifies ACE that the Bank will not extend the final expiration date of any Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 as provided in Section 7.19 , then ACE shall, on or before the later of December 31, 2014 and 90 days after receipt by ACE of such notice, either (i) cause all Lloyd’s LOCs to be terminated and returned to the Bank or (ii)

- 4 -


provide to, and thereafter maintain, Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of all outstanding Lloyd’s LOCs.
(e)     Releases of Collateral . If ACE has provided Collateral pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.11 and no Default exists, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by ACE, (i) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (a) , (ii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (b) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s, (iii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (c) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that after giving effect to such release, the Stated Amount of all LOCs will not exceed the Commitment Amount and (iv) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (d) so long as after giving effect to such release, ACE is in compliance with the Collateralization requirements of such clause (d) . In each of the foregoing cases, the Bank agrees to promptly deliver instructions and/or entitlement orders to the Custodian under the Control Agreement directing the Custodian to release such Collateral.
(f)     Release of Security Interest . If the Commitment has terminated, no LOCs are outstanding and all liabilities owing to the Bank (other than contingent indemnity liabilities hereunder) have been paid or discharged in full, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by (and at the expense of) ACE, take all actions reasonably requested by ACE to terminate the Security Agreement and the Control Agreement, any security interest arising thereunder and any Uniform Commercial Code filings made in connection therewith.
(g)     Collateralization on Final Expiration Date . If any LOC remains outstanding after the Final Expiration Date, ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of such LOC.
1.9     References to Reimbursement Agreement . To properly reflect the provisions in the Reimbursement Agreement that are incorporated by reference into the Agreement:
(a)    Section 4.11 is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 4.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” and substituting “Section 5.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” therefor.
(b)    Section 5.08 is amended by deleting the reference to “Article V” and substituting “Article VI” therefor.
(c)    Section 6.01(h) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” therefor.
(d)    Section 6.01(i) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f)” therefor.
1.10     Ongoing Conditions . The parenthetical clause at the end of Section 3.02(a)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
( provided that the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.06(i) and Section 4.07 shall be excluded from this clause (i) )
1.11     Financials . Section 4.07 is amended by (a) deleting each reference to “December 31, 2009” and substituting “December 31, 2011” therefor and (b) deleting each reference to “June 30, 2010” and substituting “June 30, 2012” therefor.
1.12     Minimum Primary FAL . Section 5.04(b) is amended by deleting the amount “$100,000,000” therein and substituting “$200,000,000” therefor.

- 5 -


1.13     Restrictions on Supported Members . Section 5.05 is amended by renumbering the second subsection “(a)” as subsection “(b)”.
1.14     Binding Effect . Section 7.06(b)(ii) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(ii) at any time (x) to an Affiliate of the Bank that is a Qualifying Bank and an Approved Credit Institution and (y) after termination of the Commitment (by acceleration or otherwise), the Bank may assign its rights to payment hereunder (but not its obligations with respect to any outstanding LOC) to any Qualifying Bank, provided that, in any such case, (I) such assignee has delivered a certificate to the Bank and ACE confirming that it is a Qualifying Bank and (II) with respect to assignments pursuant to the foregoing clause (b)(ii)(x) , any demand for compensation by any such assignee under Section 2.07 or 2.09 shall be limited to the amount, if any, which would have been demanded by the Bank if it had not assigned its interest hereunder. Any assignment by the Bank pursuant to the foregoing clause (b)(ii)(x) shall be pursuant to an assignment agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to ACE. If the Bank makes an assignment in violation of the provisions of the foregoing clause (b)(ii)(x) , then the Bank shall reimburse and indemnify ACE for all losses, liabilities, taxes, costs and expenses incurred by ACE as a result thereof.
1.15     Participation; Sub-participation . Section 7.07 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
7.07     Participation; Sub-participation . Notwithstanding Section 7.06 , the Bank shall be entitled to enter into a participation, sub-participation or any other arrangement with any other Qualifying Bank under which that Qualifying Bank will make payment to the Bank in the event of any LOC Disbursement; provided that (a) the Bank shall give notice thereof to ACE, (b) no such bank or other Person shall have any rights hereunder, (c) ACE shall continue to deal solely and directly with the Bank and (d) the proposed participant, sub-participant or Person pursuant to any other arrangement has delivered a certificate to the Bank and ACE confirming that it is a Qualifying Bank. Any other participation, sub-participation or other arrangement is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of ACE.
1.16     Notification of Non-Renewal . The following new Section 7.19 is added in appropriate numerical sequence:
7.19 Notification by Bank . The Bank will use reasonable commercial efforts to notify ACE promptly upon any determination by the Bank that it will not extend the final expiration date of any Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 (it being understood that failure to provide such notice shall not impose any liability on the Bank).
1.17     Certain Pledges . The following new Section 7.20 is added in appropriate numerical sequence:
7.20     Certain Pledges . The Bank may at any time create a security interest in all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement (including Advances or any other obligations owing to it) in favor of any Federal Reserve Bank in accordance with Regulation A of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other applicable central bank; provided that (x) no such creation of a security interest shall release the Bank from any of its obligations hereunder or substitute any such Federal Reserve Bank or similar central bank for the Bank as a party hereto and (y) any foreclosure or similar action by such Federal Reserve Bank or similar central bank shall be subject to the provisions of Section 7.06 .
1.18     Pricing Schedule . Schedule I is amended in its entirety by substituting the Schedule I attached hereto therefor.
SECTION 2     Representations and Warranties; No Defaults; Enforceability . ACE represents and warrants to the Bank that:

- 6 -


2.1     Representations and Warranties in the Agreement; No Defaults . (a) The representations and warranties set forth in Article IV of the Amended Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Amendment, as though made on and as of such date, other than any such representation or warranty that, by its terms, refers to a specific earlier date, in which case as of such specific date; (b) as of the date of this Amendment (and after giving effect hereto), no Default or Event of Default exists; and (c) as of the date hereof, ACE is a company incorporated in Switzerland with its registered office at Bärengasse 32, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
2.2     Enforceability . This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Amendment is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms, except as affected by (a) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and other similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and/or (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity) (collectively, “ Debtor Relief Laws ”).
SECTION 3     Effectiveness . This Amendment shall become effective on the date on which the Bank has received all of the following:
3.1     Amendment . A counterpart of this Amendment signed by ACE.
3.2     Upfront Fee . An upfront fee in the amount separately agreed between ACE and the Bank payable pursuant to the Fee Letter dated as of the date hereof between ACE and the Bank.
3.3     Closing Certificate . A certificate of a Responsible Officer of ACE (a) stating that each other bank that is a party to the FAL Providers’ Agreement has (i) entered into, or is concurrently entering into, an amendment to its facility agreement so that the representations and warranties, covenants and defaults in its facility agreement are substantially the same as the corresponding provisions of the Agreement as amended hereby and (ii) released, or is concurrently releasing, the subsidiary guaranty originally granted under its facility agreement; (b) certifying that, as of the date of this Amendment, ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s; and (c) certifying as to the matters set forth in Section 2.1(a) and (b) .
3.4     Authority Evidence . Certified copies of the resolutions of the Board of Directors of ACE approving the transactions contemplated by this Amendment.
3.5     Secretary’s Certificate . A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of ACE certifying that the names and true signatures of the officers of ACE that were authorized to sign the Loan Documents as of the Closing Date of the Agreement remain in full force and effect as of the date of this Amendment.
3.6     Organizational Documents . Copies of the articles or certificate of formation (or similar charter document) and the bylaws (or similar governing documents), if any, of ACE as in effect on the date of this Amendment, certified by a duly authorized representative of ACE as of the date of this Amendment.
3.7     Legal Opinions . Favorable opinions of (a) Niederer Kraft & Frey AG, Swiss counsel for ACE and (b) Mayer Brown International LLP, English counsel for ACE, each in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Bank.
SECTION 4     Release of Subsidiary Guarantors . The Bank agrees that upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , (a) the Subsidiary Guarantors shall be released from all of their obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee and (b) the Subsidiary Guarantee shall be of no further force or effect.
SECTION 5     Miscellaneous .
5.1     Continuing Effectiveness, etc. (a) Except to the extent expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and conditions of each of the Agreement, each LOC Application, the Security Agreement, the Control Agreement and the FAL Providers’ Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. ACE affirms that after giving effect to this Amendment, the Agreement, as modified hereby, and each other Loan Document to which ACE is a party will remain in full force and

- 7 -


effect and will continue to constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms except insofar as such enforcement may be limited by Debtor Relief Laws.
(b)    After the effectiveness of this Amendment, all references in the Agreement and the other Loan Documents to the “Facility Agreement” or similar terms shall refer to the Amended Agreement.
5.2     Costs and Expenses . ACE agrees to pay on demand all reasonable and documented costs and expenses of the Bank on a full indemnity basis together with any VAT thereon incurred in or in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of this Amendment, it being understood and agreed that the Bank shall not submit for reimbursement by ACE any costs or expenses associated with this Amendment.
5.3     Incorporation by Reference. The provisions of Sections 7.11 ( Third Party Rights ), 7.12 ( Execution in Counterparts ) and 7.16(a) and (b) ( Jurisdiction, etc. ) of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference, mutatis mutandis .
5.4     Governing Law . This Amendment and all non-contractual obligations arising in any way whatsoever out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by, construed and take effect in accordance with, English law.
[Signature Pages Follow]



- 8 -



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.
ACE LIMITED



By:________________________________________________
Name: Paul Medini
Title: Chief Accounting Officer



By:________________________________________________
Name: Philip Bancroft
Title: Chief Financial Officer


Signature Page to ACE Limited / ING Facility Agreement Amendment


ING BANK N.V., LONDON BRANCH



By:________________________________________________
Name: _____________________________________________
Title:_______________________________________________



Signature Page to ACE Limited / ING Facility Agreement Amendment



SCHEDULE I

Pricing Schedule

Subject to the remaining provisions of this Schedule I , the “Commitment Fee Rate” and the “LOC Commission Rate” shall equal the applicable rate determined in accordance with the pricing grid set forth below.

The rates with respect to the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate will be determined according to the following grid based upon ACE’s Public Debt Rating; provided that if ACE does not have a Public Debt Rating, the rates listed in Level V will apply.

Level
S&P/Moody’s Rating
Commitment Fee Rate *
LOC Commission Rate *
I
A+/A1 or above
0.25%
0.80%
II
A/A2
0.25%
0.90%
III
A-/A3
0.35%
1.10%
IV
BBB+/Baa1
0.35%
1.30%
V
BBB/Baa2 or below
0.40%
1.50%
* Percentage per annum.
If ACE has provided Collateral, then the LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs will be reduced to (a) 0.40% of the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; and (b) 0.50% of the Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; provided that such rates will increase to 0.60% and 0.70%, respectively, during the existence of an Event of Default. The LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs shall be determined in accordance with the pricing grid above.
The “ Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of the Collateral. The “ Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in the form of cash held with the Bank or any Custodian. The “ Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the lesser of (a) the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in a form other than cash held with the Bank or any Custodian and (b) the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs. The “ Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs.
Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Schedule I to the contrary, if at any time the difference between the Moody’s and S&P’s ratings is more than one rating grade, then for purposes of determining the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate at such time, the rating level one level below the higher rating will apply.



Sch. I
Exhibit 10.9

EXECUTION COPY

FIRST AMENDMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of November 21, 2012 (this “ Amendment ”) amends the Facility Agreement dated as of November 18, 2010 (the “ Agreement ”, and as amended by this Amendment, the “ Amended Agreement ”) between ACE Limited and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth below;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1 Amendments . Upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , the Agreement shall be amended as follows:
1.1     Amendments to Definitions .
(a)    The definition of Availability Termination Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2014” and substituting the date “December 31, 2016” therefor.
(b)    The following new definitions are added in appropriate alphabetical order:
Change in Law ” means the occurrence, after the date of the Agreement, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any governmental authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any governmental authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, adopted or issued.
First Amendment ” means the First Amendment to this Agreement dated as of November 21, 2012 between ACE and the Bank.
Public Debt Rating ” means, as of any date, the higher rating that has been most recently announced by either S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, as ACE’s long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent); provided that if at any time the difference between the ratings of such type most recently announced by S&P and Moody’s is more than one rating grade, the Public Debt Rating shall be the rating that is one grade below the higher of such two ratings. For purposes of the foregoing, (a) if only one of S&P and Moody’s shall have in effect a long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent) for ACE, the Public Debt Rating shall be the available rating; (b) if any rating established by S&P or Moody’s shall be changed, such change shall be effective for purposes of this Agreement as of ten Business Days following the date on which such change is first announced publicly by the rating agency making such change; and (c) if S&P or Moody’s shall change the basis on which ratings are established, each reference herein to ratings announced by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, shall refer to the then equivalent rating by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be.
(c)    The definition of Commitment Amount is amended by deleting the amount “$125,000,000” and substituting the amount “$150,000,000” therefor.
(d)    The definition of “Guidelines” is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

    


Guidelines ” means, collectively, guideline S-02.123 in relation to interbank loans of 22 September 1986 ( Merkblatt Verrechnungssteuer auf Zinsen von Bankguthaben, deren Gläubiger Banken sind (Interbankguthaben) vom 22. September 1986 ), guideline S-02.122.1 in relation to bonds of April 1999 ( Merkblatt Obligationen vom April 1999 ), guideline S-02.130.1 in relation to money market instruments and accounts receivable of April 1999 ( Merkblatt vom April 1999 betreffend Geldmarktpapiere und Buchforderungen inländischer Schuldner ), guideline S-02.128 in relation to syndicated credit facilities of January 2000 ( Merkblatt Steuerliche Behandlung von Konsortialdarlehen, Schuldscheindarlehen, Wechseln und Unterbeteiligungen vom Januar 2000 ), circular letter no. 34 in relation to customer credit balances of 26 July 2011 ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 34 vom 26. Juli 2011 betreffend Kundenguthaben ”) and the circular letter No. 15 of 7 February 2007 (1-015-DVS-2007) in relation to bonds and derivative financial instruments as subject matter of taxation of Swiss federal income tax, Swiss withholding tax and Swiss stamp taxes ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 15 Obligationen und derivative Finanzinstrumente als Gegenstand der direkten Bundessteuer, der Verrechnungssteuer und der Stempelabgaben vom 7. Februar 2007 ), in each case as issued, amended or replaced from time to time, by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration or as substituted or superseded and overruled by any law, statute, ordinance, court decision, regulation or the like as in force from time to time.
(e)    The definition of EURIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “EURIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “EURIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(f)    The definition of Existing FAL Facility Agreement is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting the words “certain Subsidiaries of ACE” therefor.
(g)    The definition of Final Expiration Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2015” and substituting the date “December 31, 2017” therefor.
(h)    The definition of LIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “LIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “LIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(i)    The definition of Loan Documents is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantee,” and substituting the words “the First Amendment” therefor.
(j)    After giving effect to the amendments set forth in Section 1.1(f) and (i) above, the definitions of Loan Party, Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor are deleted in their entirety.
(k)    Clause (c) of the definition of Material Adverse Effect is amended to read as follows: “the ability of ACE to perform its obligations under the Loan Documents.”
(l)    The definition of Reimbursement Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Reimbursement Agreement ” means the Credit Agreement dated as of November 6, 2012 among ACE, various subsidiaries thereof, various financial institutions and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, as such Agreement is in effect on the date hereof, without giving effect to (a) any amendment or other modification thereto or waiver thereunder unless the Bank has agreed in writing to such amendment, modification or waiver (in which case such amendment, modification or waiver shall automatically become effective hereunder, mutatis mutandis ) or (b) any termination thereof.

- 2 -


1.2     Deletion of Definition of Loan Party . To give effect to the deletion of the term “Loan Party”, (a) all references in the Agreement to “Loan Party” or “Loan Parties” shall be deemed to be references to “ACE” and (b) all other appropriate grammatical changes shall be deemed to have been made. For example, (i) Section 4.14 is amended by deleting the words “no Loan Party is” and substituting “ACE is not” therefor; and (ii) Section 6.01(m) is amended by deleting the words “the Loan Parties are” and substituting “ACE is” therefor.
1.3     Deletion of Definitions of Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor . To give effect to the deletion of the terms “Subsidiary Guarantee” and “Subsidiary Guarantor”:
(a)    Exhibit A is deleted in its entirety.
(b)    Section 4.03 is amended by deleting the language “each of ACE and the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting “ACE” therefor.
(c)    Section 4.04 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Enforceability . This Agreement has been, and each other LOC Related Document to which ACE is a party has been or when delivered hereunder will have been, duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Agreement is, and each Collateral Document and each LOC Application is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms.
(d)    Section 6.01(c)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(i) ACE shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 6.01(d), 6.02, 6.03(a) or 6.04 of the Reimbursement Agreement as incorporated herein by reference;
(e)    Section 6.01(f) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Any Supported Member or the Managing Agent shall cease to be a Wholly-owned Subsidiary of ACE;
(f)    Section 6.01(k) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.4     Minimum Interest Rates . Section 2.03(d)(ii) is amended by deleting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE, the payment of interest due by ACE” and substituting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE and it is unlawful for any reason for ACE to comply with Section 2.09 , the payment of interest due by ACE” therefor.
1.5     Fee Rate Changes . Each of Section 2.05(b) and 2.06(b) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.6     Increased Costs Provisions .
(a)    Section 2.07(a) is amended by deleting the words “If, due to (i) the introduction of or any change in or in the interpretation of, in each case after the date hereof, any law or regulation, (ii) compliance with any guideline or request issued after the date hereof by any central bank or other governmental authority (whether or not having the force of law) or (iii)” therein and substituting the words “If, due to (i) any Change in Law or (ii)” therefor.
(b)    Section 2.07(b) is amended by (x) deleting the words “If, due to (i) the introduction of or any change in or in the interpretation of any law or regulation, in each case after the date hereof, (ii) compliance with any guideline or request issued after the date hereof from any central bank or other governmental authority (whether or not having the force of law) or (iii)” and substituting the words “If, due to (i) any Change in Law or (ii)” therefor; (y) deleting the words “increase in the amount of capital required or expected” therein and substituting the words “increase in the amount of

- 3 -


capital or liquidity required or expected” therefor; and (z) deleting the words “such increase in capital to be allocable” therein and substituting the words “such increase in capital or liquidity to be allocable” therefor.
(c)    Section 2.07(d) is amended by adding the following words immediately before the period at the end thereof:
(except that, if the Change in Law giving rise to compensation is retroactive, then the 120 days shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof).
1.7     Collateral Provisions . Section 2.11 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
2.11     Collateralization of LOCs .
(a)     Voluntary Collateralization . ACE may at any time provide Collateral to secure any LOC (in which case the pricing applicable to such LOC shall be adjusted as set forth on Schedule I ). If at any time the Collateral Value of all Collateral so provided is less than the aggregate Stated Amount of all Secured LOCs, then ACE shall designate from time to time the LOCs that are deemed to be Secured LOCs or provide additional Collateral in an amount sufficient to cause the Collateral Value to equal or exceed such aggregate Stated Amount.
(b)     Collateralization upon Downgrade . If at any time the Public Debt Rating of ACE falls below BBB+ by S&P and below Baa1 by Moody’s, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days thereafter, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with an aggregate Collateral Value not less than the Stated Amount of all outstanding LOCs (and all LOCs shall be deemed to be Secured LOCs).
(c)     Collateralization due to Currency Fluctuations . If as of any Revaluation Date the Stated Amount of all LOCs exceeds the Commitment Amount, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to or greater than such excess.
(d)     Collateralization Upon Non-Renewal . If the Bank notifies ACE that the Bank will not extend the final expiration date of any Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 as provided in Section 7.19 , then ACE shall, on or before the later of December 31, 2014 and 90 days after receipt by ACE of such notice, either (i) cause all Lloyd’s LOCs to be terminated and returned to the Bank or (ii) provide to, and thereafter maintain, Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of all outstanding Lloyd’s LOCs.
(e)     Releases of Collateral . If ACE has provided Collateral pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.11 and no Default exists, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by ACE, (i) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (a) , (ii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (b) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s, (iii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (c) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that after giving effect to such release, the Stated Amount of all LOCs will not exceed the Commitment Amount and (iv) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (d) so long as after giving effect to such release, ACE is in compliance with the Collateralization requirements of such clause (d) . In each of the foregoing cases, the Bank agrees to promptly deliver instructions and/or entitlement orders to the Custodian under the Control Agreement directing the Custodian to release such Collateral.
(f)     Release of Security Interest . If the Commitment has terminated, no LOCs are outstanding and all liabilities owing to the Bank (other than contingent indemnity liabilities hereunder) have been paid or discharged in full, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by (and at the expense of) ACE, take all actions reasonably requested by ACE to terminate the Security Agreement and the

- 4 -


Control Agreement, any security interest arising thereunder and any Uniform Commercial Code filings made in connection therewith.
(g)     Collateralization on Final Expiration Date . If any LOC remains outstanding after the Final Expiration Date, ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of such LOC.
1.8     References to Reimbursement Agreement . To properly reflect the provisions in the Reimbursement Agreement that are incorporated by reference into the Agreement:
(a)    Section 4.11 is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 4.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” and substituting “Section 5.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” therefor.
(b)    Section 5.08 is amended by deleting the reference to “Article V” and substituting “Article VI” therefor.
(c)    Section 6.01(h) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” therefor.
(d)    Section 6.01(i) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f)” therefor.
1.9     Ongoing Conditions . The parenthetical clause at the end of Section 3.02(a)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
( provided that the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.06(i) and Section 4.07 shall be excluded from this clause (i) )
1.10     Financials . Section 4.07 is amended by (a) deleting each reference to “December 31, 2009” and substituting “December 31, 2011” therefor and (b) deleting each reference to “June 30, 2010” and substituting “June 30, 2012” therefor.
1.11     Minimum Primary FAL . Section 5.04(b) is amended by deleting the amount “$100,000,000” therein and substituting “$200,000,000” therefor.
1.12     Restrictions on Supported Members . Section 5.05 is amended by renumbering the second subsection “(a)” as subsection “(b)”.
1.13     Participation; Sub-participation . Section 7.07 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
7.07     Participation; Sub-participation . Notwithstanding Section 7.06 , the Bank shall be entitled to enter into a participation, sub-participation or any other arrangement with any other Qualifying Bank under which that Qualifying Bank will make payment to the Bank in the event of any LOC Disbursement; provided that (a) the Bank shall give notice thereof to ACE, (b) no such bank or other Person shall have any rights hereunder, (c) ACE shall continue to deal solely and directly with the Bank and (d) the proposed participant, sub-participant or Person pursuant to any other arrangement has delivered a certificate to the Bank and ACE confirming that it is a Qualifying Bank. Any other participation, sub-participation or other arrangement is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of ACE.
1.14     Notification of Non-Renewal . The following new Section 7.19 is added in appropriate numerical sequence:
7.19 Notification by Bank . The Bank will use reasonable commercial efforts to notify ACE promptly upon any determination by the Bank that it will not extend the final expiration date of any

- 5 -


Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 (it being understood that failure to provide such notice shall not impose any liability on the Bank).
1.15     Pricing Schedule . Schedule I is amended in its entirety by substituting the Schedule I attached hereto therefor.
SECTION 2     Representations and Warranties; No Defaults; Enforceability . ACE represents and warrants to the Bank that:
2.1     Representations and Warranties in the Agreement; No Defaults . (a) The representations and warranties set forth in Article IV of the Amended Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Amendment, as though made on and as of such date, other than any such representation or warranty that, by its terms, refers to a specific earlier date, in which case as of such specific date; (b) as of the date of this Amendment (and after giving effect hereto), no Default or Event of Default exists; and (c) as of the date hereof, ACE is a company incorporated in Switzerland with its registered office at Bärengasse 32, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
2.2     Enforceability . This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Amendment is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms, except as affected by (a) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and other similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and/or (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity) (collectively, “ Debtor Relief Laws ”).
SECTION 3     Effectiveness . This Amendment shall become effective on the date on which the Bank has received all of the following:
3.1     Amendment . A counterpart of this Amendment signed by ACE.
3.2     Upfront Fee . An upfront fee in the amount separately agreed between ACE and the Bank payable pursuant to the Fee Letter dated as of the date hereof between ACE and the Bank.
3.3     Closing Certificate . A certificate of a Responsible Officer of ACE (a) stating that each other bank that is a party to the FAL Providers’ Agreement has (i) entered into, or is concurrently entering into, an amendment to its facility agreement so that the representations and warranties, covenants and defaults in its facility agreement are substantially the same as the corresponding provisions of the Agreement as amended hereby and (ii) released, or is concurrently releasing, the subsidiary guaranty originally granted under its facility agreement; (b) certifying that, as of the date of this Amendment, ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s; and (c) certifying as to the matters set forth in Section 2.1(a) and (b) .
3.4     Authority Evidence . Certified copies of the resolutions of the Board of Directors of ACE approving the transactions contemplated by this Amendment.
3.5     Secretary’s Certificate . A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of ACE certifying that the names and true signatures of the officers of ACE that were authorized to sign the Loan Documents as of the Closing Date of the Agreement remain in full force and effect as of the date of this Amendment.
3.6     Organizational Documents . Copies of the articles or certificate of formation (or similar charter document) and the bylaws (or similar governing documents), if any, of ACE as in effect on the date of this Amendment, certified by a duly authorized representative of ACE as of the date of this Amendment.
3.7     Legal Opinions . Favorable opinions of (a) Niederer Kraft & Frey AG, Swiss counsel for ACE and (b) Mayer Brown International LLP, English counsel for ACE, each in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Bank.

- 6 -


SECTION 4     Release of Subsidiary Guarantors . The Bank agrees that upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , (a) the Subsidiary Guarantors shall be released from all of their obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee and (b) the Subsidiary Guarantee shall be of no further force or effect.
SECTION 5     Miscellaneous .
5.1     Continuing Effectiveness, etc. (a) Except to the extent expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and conditions of each of the Agreement, each LOC Application, the Security Agreement, the Control Agreement and the FAL Providers’ Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. ACE affirms that after giving effect to this Amendment, the Agreement, as modified hereby, and each other Loan Document to which ACE is a party will remain in full force and effect and will continue to constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms except insofar as such enforcement may be limited by Debtor Relief Laws.
(b)    After the effectiveness of this Amendment, all references in the Agreement and the other Loan Documents to the “Facility Agreement” or similar terms shall refer to the Amended Agreement.
5.2     Costs and Expenses . Each party hereto agrees to pay its own expenses in connection with the negotiation, execution and delivery of this Amendment.
5.3     Incorporation by Reference. The provisions of Sections 7.11 ( Third Party Rights ), 7.12 ( Execution in Counterparts ) and 7.16(a) and (b) ( Jurisdiction, etc. ) of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference, mutatis mutandis .

5.4     Governing Law . This Amendment and all non-contractual obligations arising in any way whatsoever out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by, construed and take effect in accordance with, English law.

[Signature Pages Follow]



- 7 -



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.
ACE LIMITED



By:________________________________________________
Name: Paul Medini
Title: Chief Accounting Officer



By:________________________________________________
Name: Philip Bancroft
Title: Chief Financial Officer


Signature Page to ACE Limited / BTMU Facility Agreement Amendment


THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH



By:________________________________________________
Name: _____________________________________________
Title:_______________________________________________


Signature Page to ACE Limited / BTMU Facility Agreement Amendment



SCHEDULE I

Pricing Schedule

Subject to the remaining provisions of this Schedule I , the “Commitment Fee Rate” and the “LOC Commission Rate” shall equal the applicable rate determined in accordance with the pricing grid set forth below.
The rates with respect to the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate will be determined according to the following grid based upon ACE’s Public Debt Rating; provided that if ACE does not have a Public Debt Rating, the rates listed in Level II will apply.
Level
S&P/Moody’s Rating
Commitment Fee
Rate *
LOC Commission
Rate *
I
A/A2 or above
0.20%
0.75%
II
A-/A3 or below
0.20%
0.90%
* Percentage per annum.
If ACE has provided Collateral, then the LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs will be reduced to (a) 0.40% of the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; and (b) 0.50% of the Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; provided that such rates will increase to 0.60% and 0.70%, respectively, during the existence of an Event of Default. The LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs shall be determined in accordance with the pricing grid above.
The “ Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of the Collateral. The “ Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in the form of cash held with the Bank or any Custodian. The “ Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the lesser of (a) the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in a form other than cash held with the Bank or any Custodian and (b) the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs. The “ Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs.
Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Schedule I to the contrary, if at any time the difference between the Moody’s and S&P’s ratings is more than one rating grade, then for purposes of determining the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate at such time, the rating level one level below the higher rating will apply.


Sch. I
Exhibit 10.11

EXECUTION COPY

FIRST AMENDMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of November 21, 2012 (this “ Amendment ”) amends the Facility Agreement dated as of November 18, 2010 (the “ Agreement ”, and as amended by this Amendment, the “ Amended Agreement ”) between ACE Limited and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth below;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1 Amendments . Upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , the Agreement shall be amended as follows:
1.1     Amendments to Definitions .
(a)    The definition of Affiliate is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in relation to the Bank, the term “Affiliate” shall not include (i) the government of the United Kingdom or any member or instrumentality thereof, including Her Majesty’s Treasury and UK Financial Investments Limited (or any directors, officers, employees or entities thereof) or (ii) any Persons or entities controlled by or under common control with the government of the United Kingdom or any member or instrumentality thereof (including Her Majesty’s Treasury and UK Financial Investments Limited) and which are not part of the Bank and its Subsidiaries or Subsidiary undertakings.
(b)    The definition of Availability Termination Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2014” and substituting the date “December 31, 2016” therefor.
(c)    The following new definitions are added in appropriate alphabetical order:
Change in Law ” means the occurrence, after the date of the Agreement, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any governmental authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any governmental authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, adopted or issued.
First Amendment ” means the First Amendment to this Agreement dated as of November 21, 2012 between ACE and the Bank.
Public Debt Rating ” means, as of any date, the higher rating that has been most recently announced by either S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, as ACE’s long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent); provided that if at any time the difference between the ratings of such type most recently announced by S&P and Moody’s is more than one rating grade, the Public Debt Rating shall be the rating that is one grade below the higher of such two ratings. For purposes of the foregoing, (a) if only one of S&P and Moody’s shall have in effect a long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent) for ACE, the Public Debt Rating shall be the available rating; (b) if any rating established by S&P or Moody’s shall be changed, such change shall be effective for purposes of this Agreement as of ten Business Days following the date on which such change is first announced publicly by the rating agency making such change; and (c) if S&P or Moody’s shall change the basis on which ratings are

    


established, each reference herein to ratings announced by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, shall refer to the then equivalent rating by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be.
(d)    The definition of “Guidelines” is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Guidelines ” means, collectively, guideline S-02.123 in relation to interbank loans of 22 September 1986 ( Merkblatt Verrechnungssteuer auf Zinsen von Bankguthaben, deren Gläubiger Banken sind (Interbankguthaben) vom 22. September 1986 ), guideline S-02.122.1 in relation to bonds of April 1999 ( Merkblatt Obligationen vom April 1999 ), guideline S-02.130.1 in relation to money market instruments and accounts receivable of April 1999 ( Merkblatt vom April 1999 betreffend Geldmarktpapiere und Buchforderungen inländischer Schuldner ), guideline S-02.128 in relation to syndicated credit facilities of January 2000 ( Merkblatt Steuerliche Behandlung von Konsortialdarlehen, Schuldscheindarlehen, Wechseln und Unterbeteiligungen vom Januar 2000 ), circular letter no. 34 in relation to customer credit balances of 26 July 2011 ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 34 vom 26. Juli 2011 betreffend Kundenguthaben ”) and the circular letter No. 15 of 7 February 2007 (1-015-DVS-2007) in relation to bonds and derivative financial instruments as subject matter of taxation of Swiss federal income tax, Swiss withholding tax and Swiss stamp taxes ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 15 Obligationen und derivative Finanzinstrumente als Gegenstand der direkten Bundessteuer, der Verrechnungssteuer und der Stempelabgaben vom 7. Februar 2007 ), in each case as issued, amended or replaced from time to time, by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration or as substituted or superseded and overruled by any law, statute, ordinance, court decision, regulation or the like as in force from time to time.
(e)    The definition of EURIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “EURIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “EURIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(f)    The definition of Existing FAL Facility Agreement is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting the words “certain Subsidiaries of ACE” therefor.
(g)    The definition of Final Expiration Date is amended by deleting the date “December 31, 2015” and substituting the date “December 31, 2017” therefor.
(h)    The definition of LIBOR is amended by adding the following words at the end thereof immediately before the period therein:
; provided that if “LIBOR” would be less than zero as determined pursuant to the foregoing provisions, then “LIBOR” shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
(i)    The definition of Loan Documents is amended by deleting the words “the Subsidiary Guarantee,” and substituting the words “the First Amendment” therefor.
(j)    After giving effect to the amendments set forth in Section 1.1(f) and (i) above, the definitions of Loan Party, Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor are deleted in their entirety.
(k)    Clause (c) of the definition of Material Adverse Effect is amended to read as follows: “the ability of ACE to perform its obligations under the Loan Documents.”
(l)    The definition of Reimbursement Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Reimbursement Agreement ” means the Credit Agreement dated as of November 6, 2012 among ACE, various subsidiaries thereof, various financial institutions and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, as such Agreement is in effect on the date hereof, without giving

- 2 -


effect to (a) any amendment or other modification thereto or waiver thereunder unless the Bank has agreed to such amendment, modification or waiver (in which case such amendment, modification or waiver shall automatically become effective hereunder, mutatis mutandis ) or (b) any termination thereof.
1.2     Deletion of Definition of Loan Party . To give effect to the deletion of the term “Loan Party”, (a) all references in the Agreement to “Loan Party” or “Loan Parties” shall be deemed to be references to “ACE” and (b) all other appropriate grammatical changes shall be deemed to have been made. For example, (i) Section 4.14 is amended by deleting the words “no Loan Party is” and substituting “ACE is not” therefor; and (ii) Section 6.01(m) is amended by deleting the words “the Loan Parties are” and substituting “ACE is” therefor.
1.3     Deletion of Definitions of Subsidiary Guarantee and Subsidiary Guarantor . To give effect to the deletion of the terms “Subsidiary Guarantee” and “Subsidiary Guarantor”:
(a)    Exhibit A is deleted in its entirety.
(b)    Section 4.03 is amended by deleting the language “each of ACE and the Subsidiary Guarantors” and substituting “ACE” therefor.
(c)    Section 4.04 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Enforceability . This Agreement has been, and each other LOC Related Document to which ACE is a party has been or when delivered hereunder will have been, duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Agreement is, and each Collateral Document and each LOC Application is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms.
(d)    Section 6.01(c)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(i) ACE shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 6.01(d), 6.02, 6.03(a) or 6.04 of the Reimbursement Agreement as incorporated herein by reference;
(e)    Section 6.01(f) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Any Supported Member or the Managing Agent shall cease to be a Wholly-owned Subsidiary of ACE;
(f)    Section 6.01(k) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.4     Minimum Interest Rates . Section 2.03(d)(ii) is amended by deleting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE, the payment of interest due by ACE” and substituting the words “imposed on interest payments by ACE and it is unlawful for any reason for ACE to comply with Section 2.09 , the payment of interest due by ACE” therefor.
1.5     Fee Rate Changes . Each of Section 2.05(b) and 2.06(b) is amended in its entirety to read “[Intentionally Omitted.]”.
1.6     Increased Costs Provisions .
(a)    Section 2.07(a) is amended by deleting the words “If, due to (i) the introduction of or any change in or in the interpretation of, in each case after the date hereof, any law or regulation, (ii) compliance with any guideline or request issued after the date hereof by any central bank or other governmental authority (whether or not having the force of law) or (iii)” therein and substituting the words “If, due to (i) any Change in Law or (ii)” therefor.

- 3 -


(b)    Section 2.07(b) is amended by (x) deleting the words “If, due to (i) the introduction of or any change in or in the interpretation of any law or regulation, in each case after the date hereof, (ii) compliance with any guideline or request issued after the date hereof from any central bank or other governmental authority (whether or not having the force of law) or (iii)” and substituting the words “If, due to (i) any Change in Law or (ii)” therefor; (y) deleting the words “increase in the amount of capital required or expected” therein and substituting the words “increase in the amount of capital or liquidity required or expected” therefor; and (z) deleting the words “such increase in capital to be allocable” therein and substituting the words “such increase in capital or liquidity to be allocable” therefor.
(c)    Section 2.07(d) is amended by adding the following words immediately before the period at the end thereof:
(except that, if the Change in Law giving rise to compensation is retroactive, then the 120 days shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof).
1.7     Collateral Provisions . Section 2.11 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
2.11     Collateralization of LOCs .
(a)     Voluntary Collateralization . ACE may at any time provide Collateral to secure any LOC (in which case the pricing applicable to such LOC shall be adjusted as set forth on Schedule I ). If at any time the Collateral Value of all Collateral so provided is less than the aggregate Stated Amount of all Secured LOCs, then ACE shall designate from time to time the LOCs that are deemed to be Secured LOCs or provide additional Collateral in an amount sufficient to cause the Collateral Value to equal or exceed such aggregate Stated Amount.
(b)     Collateralization upon Downgrade . If at any time the Public Debt Rating of ACE falls below BBB+ by S&P and below Baa1 by Moody’s, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with an aggregate Collateral Value not less than the Stated Amount of all outstanding LOCs (and all LOCs shall be deemed to be Secured LOCs).
(c)     Collateralization due to Currency Fluctuations . If as of any Revaluation Date the Stated Amount of all LOCs exceeds the Commitment Amount, then ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to or greater than such excess.
(d)     Collateralization Upon Non-Renewal . If the Bank notifies ACE that the Bank will not extend the final expiration date of any Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 as provided in Section 7.21 , then ACE shall, on or before the later of December 31, 2014 and 90 days after receipt by ACE of such notice, either (i) cause all Lloyd’s LOCs to be terminated and returned to the Bank or (ii) provide to, and thereafter maintain, Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of all outstanding Lloyd’s LOCs.
(e)     Releases of Collateral . If ACE has provided Collateral pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.11 and no Default exists, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by ACE, (i) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (a) , (ii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (b) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s, (iii) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (c) so long as such request is accompanied by evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Bank, that after giving effect to such release, the Stated Amount of all LOCs will not exceed the Commitment Amount and (iv) release any Collateral granted pursuant to clause (d) so long as after giving effect to such release, ACE is in compliance with the Collateralization requirements of such clause (d) . In each of the foregoing cases, the Bank agrees to promptly deliver instructions and/or entitlement orders to the Custodian under the Control Agreement directing the Custodian to release such Collateral.

- 4 -


(f)     Release of Security Interest . If the Commitment has terminated, no LOCs are outstanding and all liabilities owing to the Bank (other than contingent indemnity liabilities hereunder) have been paid or discharged in full, then the Bank shall, promptly upon request by (and at the expense of) ACE, take all actions reasonably requested by ACE to terminate the Security Agreement and the Control Agreement, any security interest arising thereunder and any Uniform Commercial Code filings made in connection therewith.
(g)     Collateralization on Final Expiration Date . If any LOC remains outstanding after the Final Expiration Date, ACE shall promptly, and in any event within five Business Days, provide and so long as such circumstance continues shall maintain Collateral with a Collateral Value equal to the Stated Amount of such LOC.
1.8     References to Reimbursement Agreement . To properly reflect the provisions in the Reimbursement Agreement that are incorporated by reference into the Agreement:
(a)    Section 4.11 is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 4.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” and substituting “Section 5.01 of the Reimbursement Agreement” therefor.
(b)    Section 5.08 is amended by deleting the reference to “Article V” and substituting “Article VI” therefor.
(c)    Section 6.01(h) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f), (g), (h), (j), (k) or (l)” therefor.
(d)    Section 6.01(i) is amended by deleting the reference to “Section 6.01(f)” and substituting “Section 7.01(f)” therefor.
1.9     Ongoing Conditions . The parenthetical clause at the end of Section 3.02(a)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
( provided that the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.06(i) and Section 4.07 shall be excluded from this clause (i) )
1.10     Financials . Section 4.07 is amended by (a) deleting each reference to “December 31, 2009” and substituting “December 31, 2011” therefor and (b) deleting each reference to “June 30, 2010” and substituting “June 30, 2012” therefor.
1.11     Minimum Primary FAL . Section 5.04(b) is amended by deleting the amount “$100,000,000” therein and substituting “$200,000,000” therefor.
1.12     Restrictions on Supported Members . Section 5.05 is amended by renumbering the second subsection “(a)” as subsection “(b)”.
1.13     Participation; Sub-participation . Section 7.07 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
7.07     Participation; Sub-participation . Notwithstanding Section 7.06 , the Bank shall be entitled to enter into a participation, sub-participation or any other arrangement with any other Qualifying Bank under which that Qualifying Bank will make payment to the Bank in the event of any LOC Disbursement; provided that (a) the Bank shall give notice thereof to ACE, (b) no such bank or other Person shall have any rights hereunder, (c) ACE shall continue to deal solely and directly with the Bank and (d) the proposed participant, sub-participant or Person pursuant to any other arrangement has delivered a certificate to the Bank and ACE confirming that it is a Qualifying Bank. Any other participation, sub-participation or other arrangement is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of ACE.
1.14     Certain Pledges . Section 7.19 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

- 5 -


7.19 Certain Pledges . The Bank may at any time create a security interest in all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement (including Advances or any other obligations owing to it) in favor of any Federal Reserve Bank in accordance with Regulation A of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other applicable central bank; provided that (x) no such creation of a security interest shall release the Bank from any of its obligations hereunder or substitute any such Federal Reserve Bank or similar central bank for the Bank as a party hereto and (y) any foreclosure or similar action by such Federal Reserve Bank or similar central bank shall be subject to the provisions of Section 7.06 .
1.15     Notification of Non-Renewal . The following new Section 7.21 is added in appropriate numerical sequence:
7.21 Notification by Bank . The Bank will use reasonable commercial efforts to notify ACE promptly upon any determination by the Bank that it will not extend the final expiration date of any Lloyds LOC beyond December 31, 2017 (it being understood that failure to provide such notice shall not impose any liability on the Bank).
1.16     Pricing Schedule . Schedule I is amended in its entirety by substituting the Schedule I attached hereto therefor.
SECTION 2     Representations and Warranties; No Defaults; Enforceability . ACE represents and warrants to the Bank that:
2.1     Representations and Warranties in the Agreement; No Defaults . (a) The representations and warranties set forth in Article IV of the Amended Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Amendment, as though made on and as of such date, other than any such representation or warranty that, by its terms, refers to a specific earlier date, in which case as of such specific date; (b) as of the date of this Amendment (and after giving effect hereto), no Default or Event of Default exists; and (c) as of the date hereof, ACE is a company incorporated in Switzerland with its registered office at Bärengasse 32, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
2.2     Enforceability . This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by ACE; this Amendment is or when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms, except as affected by (a) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and other similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and/or (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity) (collectively, “ Debtor Relief Laws ”).
SECTION 3     Effectiveness . This Amendment shall become effective on the date on which the Bank has received all of the following:
3.1     Amendment . A counterpart of this Amendment signed by ACE.
3.2     Upfront Fee . An upfront fee in the amount separately agreed between ACE and the Bank payable pursuant to the Fee Letter dated as of the date hereof between ACE and the Bank.
3.3     Closing Certificate . A certificate of a Responsible Officer of ACE (a) stating that each other bank that is a party to the FAL Providers’ Agreement has (i) entered into, or is concurrently entering into, an amendment to its facility agreement so that the representations and warranties, covenants and defaults in its facility agreement are substantially the same as the corresponding provisions of the Agreement as amended hereby and (ii) released, or is concurrently releasing, the subsidiary guaranty originally granted under its facility agreement; (b) certifying that, as of the date of this Amendment, ACE has a Public Debt Rating of BBB+ or better from S&P or Baa1 or better from Moody’s; and (c) certifying as to the matters set forth in Section 2.1(a) and (b) .
3.4     Authority Evidence . Certified copies of the resolutions of the Board of Directors of ACE approving the transactions contemplated by this Amendment.

- 6 -


3.5     Secretary’s Certificate . A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of ACE certifying that the names and true signatures of the officers of ACE that were authorized to sign the Loan Documents as of the Closing Date of the Agreement remain in full force and effect as of the date of this Amendment.
3.6     Organizational Documents . Copies of the articles or certificate of formation (or similar charter document) and the bylaws (or similar governing documents), if any, of ACE as in effect on the date of this Amendment, certified by a duly authorized representative of ACE as of the date of this Amendment.
3.7     Legal Opinions . Favorable opinions of (a) Niederer Kraft & Frey AG, Swiss counsel for ACE and (b) Mayer Brown International LLP, English counsel for ACE, each in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Bank.
SECTION 4     Release of Subsidiary Guarantors . The Bank agrees that upon the effectiveness hereof pursuant to Section 3 , (a) the Subsidiary Guarantors shall be released from all of their obligations under the Subsidiary Guarantee and (b) the Subsidiary Guarantee shall be of no further force or effect.
SECTION 5     Miscellaneous .
5.1     Continuing Effectiveness, etc. (a) Except to the extent expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and conditions of each of the Agreement, each LOC Application, the Security Agreement, the Control Agreement and the FAL Providers’ Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. ACE affirms that after giving effect to this Amendment, the Agreement, as modified hereby, and each other Loan Document to which ACE is a party will remain in full force and effect and will continue to constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of ACE, enforceable against ACE in accordance with its terms except insofar as such enforcement may be limited by Debtor Relief Laws.
(b)    After the effectiveness of this Amendment, all references in the Agreement and the other Loan Documents to the “Facility Agreement” or similar terms shall refer to the Amended Agreement.
5.2     Costs and Expenses . Each party hereto agrees to pay its own expenses in connection with the negotiation, execution and delivery of this Amendment.
5.3     Incorporation by Reference. The provisions of Sections 7.11 ( Third Party Rights ), 7.12 ( Execution in Counterparts ), 7.16(a) and (b) ( Jurisdiction, etc. ) and 7.18 ( Waiver of Jury Trial ) of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference, mutatis mutandis .

5.4     Governing Law . This Amendment and all non-contractual obligations arising in any way whatsoever out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by, construed and take effect in accordance with, English law.

[Signature Pages Follow]



- 7 -



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.
ACE LIMITED



By:________________________________________________
Name: Paul Medini
Title: Chief Accounting Officer


By:________________________________________________
Name: Philip Bancroft
Title: Chief Financial Officer


Signature Page to ACE Limited / RBS Facility Agreement Amendment


THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC



By:________________________________________________
Name: _____________________________________________
Title:_______________________________________________


Signature Page to ACE Limited / RBS Facility Agreement Amendment



SCHEDULE I

Pricing Schedule

Subject to the remaining provisions of this Schedule I , the “Commitment Fee Rate” and the “LOC Commission Rate” shall equal the applicable rate determined in accordance with the pricing grid set forth below.
The rates with respect to the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate will be determined according to the following grid based upon ACE’s Public Debt Rating; provided that if ACE does not have a Public Debt Rating, the rates listed in Level V will apply.
Level
S&P/Moody’s Rating
Commitment Fee
Rate *
LOC Commission
Rate *
I
A+/A1 or above
0.30%
0.80%
II
A/A2
0.32%
0.90%
III
A-/A3
0.35%
1.10%
IV
BBB+/Baa1
0.35%
1.30%
V
BBB/Baa2 or below
0.40%
1.50%
* Percentage per annum.
If ACE has provided Collateral, then the LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs will be reduced to (a) 0.40% of the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; and (b) 0.50% of the Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs; provided that such rates will increase to 0.60% and 0.70%,respectively, during the existence of an Event of Default. The LOC Commission Rate in respect of the Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs shall be determined in accordance with the pricing grid above.
The “ Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of the Collateral. The “ Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in the form of cash held with the Bank or any Custodian. The “ Non-Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means a portion of the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs equal to the lesser of (a) the aggregate Collateral Value of any Collateral that is provided in a form other than cash held with the Bank or any Custodian and (b) the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Cash Collateralized Portion of the LOCs. The “ Uncollateralized Portion of the LOCs ” means the aggregate Stated Amount of all LOCs minus the Collateralized Portion of the LOCs.
Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Schedule I to the contrary, if at any time the difference between the Moody’s and S&P’s ratings is more than one rating grade, then for purposes of determining the LOC Commission Rate and the Commitment Fee Rate at such time, the rating level one level below the higher rating will apply.

Sch. I



CREDIT AGREEMENT
among
ACE LIMITED
ACE BERMUDA INSURANCE LTD.
ACE TEMPEST LIFE REINSURANCE LTD.
ACE TEMPEST REINSURANCE LTD.
ACE INA HOLDINGS INC.
as Borrowers
THE BANKS NAMED HEREIN,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as Administrative Agent, the Swingline Bank and an Issuing Bank
and
CITIBANK, N.A.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as Co-Syndication Agents
$1,000,000,000 Senior Unsecured Letter of Credit Facility
WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
Joint Book Runners and Joint Lead Arrangers
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
LLOYDS SECURITIES, INC.
THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Co-Documentation Agents
Dated as of November 6, 2012






TABLE OF CONTENTS




Page
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
1.01
Certain Defined Terms
1
1.02
Computation of Time Periods; Other Definitional Provisions
25
1.03
Accounting Terms and Determinations
25
1.04
Exchange Rates; Currency Equivalents
26
1.05
Redenomination of Certain Foreign Currencies and Computation of Dollar Amounts
27
1.06
Times of Day
27
ARTICLE II
AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF THE CREDIT
2.01
Commitments
27
2.02
Borrowings
28
2.03
Disbursements; Funding Reliance; Domicile of Loans
31
2.04
Evidence of Debt; Notes
32
2.05
Termination or Reduction of the Commitments
33
2.06
Mandatory Payments
33
2.07
Voluntary Prepayments
33
2.08
Interest
34
2.09
Fees
36
2.10
Conversions and Continuations
37
2.11
Payments and Computations; Apportionment of Payments
38
2.12
Recovery of Payments
40
2.13
Use of Proceeds
41
2.14
Pro Rata Treatment
41
2.15
Increased Costs, Etc
42
2.16
Taxes
44
2.17
Compensation
47
2.18
Replacement of Affected Bank, Defaulting Bank or Nonconsenting Bank
48
2.19
Increase in Commitments
48
2.20
Defaulting Banks
51
ARTICLE III
LETTERS OF CREDIT
3.01
Syndicated Letters of Credit
55
3.02
Participated Letters of Credit
58
3.03
Existing Letters of Credit
63
3.04
Conditions Precedent to the Issuance of Letters of Credit
63
3.05
Obligations Absolute
64
3.06
Interest
66
3.07
Collateralization of Letters of Credit
66
3.08
Use of Letters of Credit
67


 
 
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)



Page
ARTICLE IV
CONDITIONS OF LENDING AND ISSUANCES OF LETTERS OF CREDIT
4.01
Conditions Precedent to Effective Date
67
4.02
Conditions Precedent to all Credit Extensions
69
4.03
Determinations Under Section 4.01
69
ARTICLE V
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
5.01
Representations and Warranties of the Borrowers
70
5.02
Representations by Banks
74
ARTICLE VI
COVENANTS OF THE BORROWERS
6.01
Affirmative Covenants
74
6.02
Negative Covenants
76
6.03
Reporting Requirements
79
6.04
Financial Covenants
82
ARTICLE VII
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
7.01
Events of Default
83
7.02
Actions in Respect of the Letters of Credit upon Default
85
ARTICLE VIII
THE GUARANTY
8.01
The Guaranty
86
8.02
Guaranty Unconditional
86
8.03
Discharge Only upon Payment in Full; Reinstatement in Certain Circumstances
87
8.04
Waiver by the Parent
87
8.05
Subrogation
87
8.06
Stay of Acceleration
88
8.07
Continuing Guaranty; Assignments
88
8.08
Subordination of Other Obligations
88



 
 
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)



Page
ARTICLE IX
THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
9.01
Appointment and Authority
89
9.02
Rights as a Bank
89
9.03
Exculpatory Provisions
89
9.04
Reliance by Administrative Agent
90
9.05
Delegation of Duties
91
9.06
Successor Administrative Agent
91
9.07
Non-Reliance on Administrative Agent and Other Banks
91
9.08
No Other Duties, Etc
92
9.09
Administrative Agent May File Proofs of Claim
92
9.10
Issuing Bank and Swingline Bank
92
ARTICLE X
MISCELLANEOUS
10.01
Amendments, Etc
93
10.02
Notices, Etc
94
10.03
No Waiver; Remedies
95
10.04
Costs and Expenses; Indemnity
95
10.05
Right of Set‑off
97
10.06
Binding Effect
97
10.07
Assignments and Participations
97
10.08
Counterparts; Integration
102
10.09
No Liability of the Issuing Banks
102
10.10
Confidentiality
103
10.11
Jurisdiction, Etc
103
10.12
Governing Law
104
10.13
Waiver of Jury Trial
104
10.14
Disclosure of Information
104
10.15
Judgment Currency
105
10.16
Certain Swiss Withholding Tax Matters
105
10.17
USA Patriot Act Notice
106
10.18
Termination of Existing Agreements
106
10.19
No Fiduciary Duty
106


 
 
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)




Schedule I        Commitments
Schedule II        Existing Letters of Credit
Schedule 6.02(a)    Liens
Exhibit A-1        Form of Note
Exhibit A-2        Form of Swingline Note
Exhibit B-1        Form of Notice of Borrowing
Exhibit B-2        Form of Notice of Swingline Borrowing
Exhibit B-3        Form of Notice of Conversion/Continuation
Exhibit C        Form of Assignment and Acceptance
Exhibit D        Form of Syndicated Letter of Credit



 
 
 




CREDIT AGREEMENT
THIS CREDIT AGREEMENT dated as of November 6, 2012, among ACE Limited, a Swiss company (the “ Parent ”), ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., a Bermuda company (“ ACE Bermuda ”), ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda company (“ Tempest Life ”), ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda company (“ Tempest ”), and ACE INA Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ ACE INA ” and together with the Parent, ACE Bermuda, Tempest Life and Tempest, the “ Borrowers ” and each individually a “ Borrower ”), the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signature pages hereof as the Initial Banks (the “ Initial Banks ”), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“ Wells Fargo ”), as an Issuing Bank (as hereinafter defined), Citibank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents (collectively, the “ Syndication Agents ”), Barclays Bank PLC, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Lloyds Securities, Inc., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. and Bank of America, N.A., as co-documentation agents (collectively, the “ Documentation Agents ”), and Wells Fargo, as administrative agent (together with any successor administrative agent appointed pursuant to Article IX , the “ Administrative Agent ” and, together with the Syndication Agents and Documentation Agents, the “ Agents ”) for the Banks.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS
A. The Borrowers have requested that the Banks make available to the Borrowers a senior unsecured credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000,000 for the issuance of standby letters of credit for the account of the Borrowers or the account of any wholly owned subsidiary of the Parent, with a subfacility of $300,000,000 for the making of Revolving Loans to the Borrowers.
B.      The Banks are willing to make available to the Borrowers the credit facilities described herein subject to and on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
1.01      Certain Defined Terms . As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings (such meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined):
Account Designation Letter ” means, with respect to each Borrower, a letter from such Borrower to the Administrative Agent, duly completed and signed by an Authorized Officer of such Borrower and in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent,





listing any one or more accounts to which such Borrower may from time to time request the Administrative Agent to forward the proceeds of any Loans made hereunder.
ACE Bermuda ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
ACE INA ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Additional Bank ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.19(a) .
Adjusted Consolidated Debt ” means, at any time, an amount equal to (i) the then outstanding Consolidated Debt of the Parent and its Subsidiaries plus (ii) to the extent exceeding an amount equal to 15% of Total Capitalization, the then issued and outstanding amount of Preferred Securities (other than any Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Securities).
Adjusted Base Rate ” means, at any time with respect to any Base Rate Loan, a rate per annum equal to the Base Rate as in effect at such time plus the Applicable Margin for Base Rate Loans in effect at such time.
Adjusted LIBOR Rate ” means, at any time with respect to any LIBOR Loan, a rate per annum equal to the LIBOR Rate for the current Interest Period for such LIBOR Loan plus the Applicable Margin for LIBOR Loans in effect at such time.
Administrative Agent ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Administrative Agent’s Account ” means the account of the Administrative Agent maintained by the Administrative Agent at Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Charlotte, NC, ABA: 121000248, Acct: 01104331628807, Acct. Name: Agency Services Clearing A/C, Ref: ACE Ltd., Attn: Financial Cash Controls, or such other account as the Administrative Agent shall specify in writing to the Banks.
Administrative Questionnaire ” means, with respect to each Bank, the administrative questionnaire in the form submitted to such Bank by the Administrative Agent and returned to the Administrative Agent duly completed by such Bank.
Affected Bank ” means any Bank that (i) has made, or notified any Borrower that an event or circumstance has occurred which may give rise to, a demand for compensation under Section 2.15(a) or (b) or Section 2.16 (but only so long as the event or circumstance giving rise to such demand or notice is continuing), (ii) becomes a Non-Qualifying Bank if the Parent determines such Bank’s continuation as a Bank would, or would be reasonably likely to, result in Swiss Withholding Tax being applicable to any payment under this Agreement or (iii) is a Non-NAIC Bank for which no Bank agreed to act as a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank.
Affiliate ” means, as to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person or is a director or officer of such Person. For purposes of this definition, the term “control” (including the terms “controlling”, “controlled by” and “under common control with”) of a Person means the possession, direct or

2    



indirect, of the power to vote 5% or more of the Voting Interests of such Person or to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of Voting Interests, by contract or otherwise.
Agents ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Agreement ” means this Credit Agreement.
Agreement Currency ” has the meaning specified in Section   10.15 .
Applicable Currency ” means, with respect to any Letter of Credit, Dollars or the Foreign Currency in which the Stated Amount of such Letter of Credit is denominated.
Applicable Lending Office ” means, with respect to any Bank, the office of such Bank described as such in its Administrative Questionnaire or in the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it became a Bank, as the case may be, or such other office of such Bank as such Bank may from time to time specify to any Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
Applicable Margin ”, “ Applicable Commitment Fee Percentage ” or “ Applicable Letter of Credit Fee Percentage ”, respectively, means, as of any date, a percentage per annum determined by reference to the Public Debt Rating in effect on such date as set forth below:
Public Debt Rating
S&P/Moody’s
Applicable Commitment Fee Percentage
Applicable Letter of Credit Fee
Percentage
Applicable Margin for LIBOR Loans
Applicable Margin for Base Rate Loans
Level 1
A+/A1 and above
0.100%
1.000%
1.000%
0.000%
Level 2
A/A2
0.125%
1.125%
1.125%
0.125%
Level 3
A-/A3
0.150%
1.250%
1.250%
0.250%
Level 4
BBB+/Baa1
0.200%
1.500%
1.500%
0.500%
Level 5
Lower than Level 4
0.250%
1.750%
1.750%
0.750%
If neither S&P nor Moody’s has assigned the Parent a Public Debt Rating, Level 5 shall apply.

Approved Investment ” means any Investment that was made by the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to investment guidelines set forth by the board of directors of the Parent which are consistent with past practices.

Assignment and Acceptance ” means an assignment and acceptance entered into by a Bank and an Eligible Assignee, and accepted by the Administrative Agent, in accordance with Section 10.07 and in substantially the form of Exhibit C hereto.
Authorized Officer ” means, with respect to any action specified herein to be taken by or on behalf of a Borrower, any officer of such Borrower duly authorized by resolution of its board

3    



of directors or other governing body to take such action on its behalf, and whose signature and incumbency shall have been certified to the Administrative Agent by the secretary, an assistant secretary or any other appropriately authorized officer of such Borrower.
Availability Period ” means the period from the Effective Date to the Maturity Date.
Bankruptcy Laws ” means the Bankruptcy Code, Part XIII of the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, and all other liquidation, conservatorship, bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors, moratorium, rearrangement, receivership, insolvency, reorganization, or similar debtor relief laws of the United States, Bermuda, Switzerland or other applicable jurisdictions or of any Insurance Regulatory Authority from time to time in effect and affecting the rights of creditors generally.
Bankruptcy Code ” means 11 U.S.C. §§101 et seq., and all rules from time to time promulgated thereunder.
Banks ” means the Initial Banks and each Person that shall become a Bank hereunder pursuant to Section 2.19 or Section   10.07(a) , (b) and (c) for so long as such Initial Bank or Person, as the case may be, shall be a party to this Agreement. Unless specifically provided otherwise or the context otherwise requires, all references herein to a Bank or the Banks shall be deemed to include the Issuing Banks and the Swingline Bank.
Base Amount ” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.04(b) .
Base Rate ” means, for any day, a rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the rate of interest most recently publicly announced by Wells Fargo in Charlotte, North Carolina, as its prime rate (which may not necessarily be its lowest or best lending rate), as adjusted to conform to changes as of the opening of business on the date of any such change in such prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum, and (iii) the LIBOR Rate that would be in effect for an Interest Period of one month beginning on such day (or, if such day is not a Business Day, on the most recent Business Day) plus 1.0%.
Base Rate Loan ” means, at any time, any Loan that bears interest at such time at the Adjusted Base Rate.
Borrowers ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Borrowing ” means the incurrence by a Borrower (including as a result of conversions or continuations of outstanding Loans pursuant to Section 2.10 ) on a single date of a group of Loans pursuant to Section 2.02 of a single Type (or a Swingline Loan made by the Swingline Bank) and, in the case of LIBOR Loans, as to which a single Interest Period is in effect.
Borrowing Date ” means, with respect to any Borrowing, the date upon which such Borrowing is made.
Business Day ” means a day of the year on which banks are not required or authorized by law to close in Charlotte, North Carolina, New York, New York, London, England or Bermuda.

4    



Canadian Dollars ” means the Currency of Canada.
Capitalized Leases ” means all leases that have been or should be, in accordance with GAAP, recorded as capitalized leases.
Cash Collateral Account ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.07(a) .
Cash Collateralize ” means to pledge and deposit with or deliver to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the Administrative Agent or an Issuing Bank (as applicable) and the Banks, as collateral for the Letter of Credit Exposure or obligations of any Banks to fund participations in respect thereof (as the context may require), cash or deposit account balances or, if the Administrative Agent and the applicable Issuing Bank(s) shall agree, other credit support pursuant to documentation satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and such Issuing Bank. “ Cash Collateral ” has a meaning correlative to the foregoing and shall include the proceeds of Cash Collateral and other credit support.
Change in Law ” means the occurrence, after the date of this Agreement, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any Governmental Authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any Governmental Authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, adopted or issued.
Change of Control ” means the occurrence of any of the following: (a) any Person or two or more Persons acting in concert shall have acquired beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d‑3 of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), directly or indirectly, of Voting Interests of the Parent (or other securities convertible into such Voting Interests) representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of all Voting Interests of the Parent or (b) a majority of the board of directors of the Parent shall not be Continuing Members.
Citibank ” means Citibank, N.A.
Commitment ” means, with respect to any Bank at any time, the commitment of such Bank to make Revolving Loans to the Borrowers, to Issue and/or participate in Letters of Credit in an aggregate principal Dollar Amount at any time outstanding up to the amount set forth opposite such Bank’s name on Schedule I hereto under the caption “Commitment Amount” or, if such Bank has entered into one or more Assignment and Acceptances, the aggregate principal Dollar Amount set forth for such Bank in the Register maintained by the Administrative Agent

5    



pursuant to Section   10.07(d) as such Bank’s “Commitment Amount”, as such amount may be reduced from time to time pursuant to the terms hereof.
Commitment Increase ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.19(a) .
Commitment Increase Date ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.19(c) .
Confidential Information ” means information that any Borrower furnishes to any Agent or any Bank, but does not include any such information that is or becomes generally available to the public other than as a result of a breach by any Agent or any Bank of its obligations hereunder or that is or becomes available to such Agent or such Bank from a source other than the Borrowers that is not, to the best of such Agent’s or such Bank’s knowledge, acting in violation of a confidentiality agreement with a Borrower.
Commitment Letter ” means the commitment letter from the Joint Lead Arrangers to the Borrowers, dated October 1, 2012.
Consolidated ” refers to the consolidation of accounts in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Net Income ” means, for any period, the net income of the Parent and its Consolidated Subsidiaries, determined on a Consolidated basis for such period.
Consolidated Net Worth ” means at any date the Consolidated stockholders’ equity of the Parent and its Consolidated Subsidiaries determined as of such date, provided that such determination for purposes of Section   6.04 shall be made without giving effect to adjustments pursuant to Statement No. 115 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board of the United States.
Contingent Obligation ” means, with respect to any Person, any obligation or arrangement of such Person to guarantee or intended to guarantee any Debt, leases, dividends or other payment obligations (“ primary obligations ”) of any other Person (the “ primary obligor ”) in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, including (a) the direct or indirect guarantee, endorsement (other than for collection or deposit in the ordinary course of business), co‑making, discounting with recourse or sale with recourse by such Person of the obligation of a primary obligor, (b) the obligation to make take-or-pay or similar payments, if required, regardless of nonperformance by any other party or parties to an agreement or (c) any obligation of such Person, whether or not contingent, (i) to purchase any such primary obligation or any property constituting direct or indirect security therefor, (ii) to advance or supply funds (A) for the purchase or payment of any such primary obligation or (B) to maintain working capital or equity capital of the primary obligor or otherwise to maintain the net worth or solvency of the primary obligor, (iii) to purchase property, assets, securities or services primarily for the purpose of assuring the owner of any such primary obligation of the ability of the primary obligor to make payment of such primary obligation or (iv) otherwise to assure or hold harmless the holder of such primary obligation against loss in respect thereof; provided , however , that Contingent Obligations shall not include any obligations of any such Person arising under insurance contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business. The amount of any Contingent Obligation shall be deemed to be an amount equal to the stated or determinable amount of the

6    



primary obligation in respect of which such Contingent Obligation is made (or, if less, the maximum amount of such primary obligation for which such Person may be liable pursuant to the terms of the instrument evidencing such Contingent Obligation) or, if not stated or determinable, the maximum reasonably anticipated liability in respect thereof (assuming such Person is required to perform thereunder), as determined by such Person in good faith.
Continuing Member ” means a member of the Board of Directors of the Parent who either (i) was a member of the Parent’s Board of Directors on the date of execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Parent and has been such continuously thereafter or (ii) became a member of such Board of Directors after such date and whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of the majority of the Continuing Members then members of the Parent’s Board of Directors.
Credit Exposure ” means, with respect to any Bank at any time, the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of all Revolving Loans made by such Bank that are outstanding at such time, (ii) such Bank’s Letter of Credit Exposure at such time and (iii) such Bank’s Swingline Exposure at such time.
Credit Extension ” means either of the following: (i) a Borrowing of Loans or (ii) the Issuance of any Letter of Credit.
Currency ” means the lawful currency of any country.
Debenture ” means debt securities issued by ACE INA or the Parent to a Special Purpose Trust in exchange for proceeds of Preferred Securities and common securities of such Special Purpose Trust.
Debt ” of any Person means, without duplication for purposes of calculating financial ratios, (a) all indebtedness of such Person for borrowed money, (b) all obligations of such Person for the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than trade payables incurred in the ordinary course of such Person’s business), (c) all obligations of such Person evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures or other similar instruments, (d) all obligations of such Person created or arising under any conditional sale or other title retention agreement with respect to property acquired by such Person (even though the rights and remedies of the seller or lender under such agreement in the event of default are limited to repossession or sale of such property), (e) all obligations of such Person as lessee under Capitalized Leases (excluding imputed interest), (f) all obligations of such Person under acceptance, letter of credit or similar facilities, (g) all obligations of such Person to purchase, redeem, retire, defease or otherwise make any payment in respect of any Equity Interests (except for obligations to pay for Equity Interests within customary settlement periods) in such Person or any other Person or any warrants, rights or options to acquire such capital stock (excluding payments under a contract for the forward sale of ordinary shares of such Person issued in a public offering), valued, in the case of Redeemable Preferred Interests, at the greater of its voluntary or involuntary liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends, (h) all Contingent Obligations of such Person in respect of Debt (of the types described above) of any other Person and (i) all indebtedness and other payment obligations referred to in clauses (a) through (h) above of another Person secured by (or for

7    



which the holder of such Debt has an existing right, contingent or otherwise, to be secured by) any Lien on property (including accounts and contract rights) owned by such Person, even though such Person has not assumed or become liable for the payment of such indebtedness or other payment obligations; provided , however , that the amount of Debt of such Person under clause (i) above shall, if such Person has not assumed or otherwise become liable for any such Debt, be limited to the lesser of the principal amount of such Debt or the fair market value of all property of such Person securing such Debt; provided further that “Debt” shall not include obligations in respect of insurance or reinsurance contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business or any obligations of such Person (1) to purchase securities (or other property) which arise out of or in connection with the sale of the same or substantially similar securities (or other property) or (2) to return collateral consisting of securities arising out of or in connection with the loan of the same or substantially similar securities; provided further that, solely for purposes of Section   6.04 and the definitions of “Adjusted Consolidated Debt” and “Total Capitalization”, “Debt” shall not include (x) any contingent obligations of any Person under or in connection with acceptance, letter of credit or similar facilities or (y) obligations of the Parent or ACE INA under any Debentures or under any subordinated guaranty of any Preferred Securities or obligations of a Special Purpose Trust under any Preferred Securities.
Default ” means any Event of Default or any event that would constitute an Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or time elapse or both.
Defaulting Bank ” means, subject to Section 2.20(b) , any Bank that (i) has failed to (x) fund all or any portion of its Loans within two Business Days of the date such Loans were required to be funded hereunder unless such Bank notifies the Administrative Agent and the Parent in writing that such failure is the result of such Bank’s determination that one or more conditions precedent to funding (each of which conditions precedent, together with any applicable default, shall be specifically identified in such writing) has not been satisfied, or (y) pay to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank, any Swingline Bank or any other Bank any other amount required to be paid by it hereunder (including in respect of its participation in Letters of Credit or Swingline Loans) within two Business Days of the date when due, (ii) has notified the Parent, the Administrative Agent or any Issuing Bank or Swingline Bank in writing that it does not intend to comply with its funding obligations hereunder, or has made a public statement to that effect (unless such writing or public statement relates to such Bank’s obligation to fund a Loan hereunder and states that such position is based on such Bank’s determination that a condition precedent to funding (which condition precedent, together with any applicable default, shall be specifically identified in such writing or public statement) cannot be satisfied), (iii) has failed, within three Business Days after written request by the Administrative Agent or the Parent, to confirm in writing to the Administrative Agent and the Parent that it will comply with its prospective funding obligations hereunder ( provided that such Bank shall cease to be a Defaulting Bank pursuant to this clause (iii) upon receipt of such written confirmation by the Administrative Agent and the Parent), or (iv) has, or has a direct or indirect parent company that has, (x) become the subject of a proceeding under any Bankruptcy Law except for any undisclosed administration or comparable pre-insolvency proceedings which may form part of such laws, or (y) had appointed for it a receiver, custodian, conservator, trustee, administrator, assignee for the benefit of creditors or similar Person charged with reorganization or liquidation

8    



of its business or assets, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other state or federal regulatory authority acting in such a capacity; provided that a Bank shall not be a Defaulting Bank solely by virtue of the ownership or acquisition of any equity interest in that Bank or any direct or indirect parent company thereof by a Governmental Authority so long as such ownership interest does not result in or provide such Bank with immunity from the jurisdiction of courts within the United States or from the enforcement of judgments or writs of attachment on its assets or permit such Bank (or such Governmental Authority) to reject, repudiate, disavow or disaffirm any contracts or agreements made with such Bank. Any determination by the Administrative Agent that a Bank is a Defaulting Bank under any one or more of clauses (i) through (iv) above shall be conclusive and binding absent manifest error, and such Bank shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Bank (subject to Section 2.20(b) ) upon delivery of written notice of such determination to the Parent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank and each Bank.
Documentation Agents ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Dollar Amount ” means (i) with respect to Dollars or an amount denominated in Dollars, such amount, and (ii) with respect to an amount of Foreign Currency or an amount denominated in a Foreign Currency, the equivalent of such amount in Dollars as determined by the Administrative Agent at such time on the basis of the Spot Rate (determined with respect to the most recent Revaluation Date) for the purchase of Dollars with such Foreign Currency.
Dollars ” or “ $ ” means dollars of the United States.
Effective Date ” means the first date on which the conditions set forth in Article IV shall have been satisfied.
Eligible Assignee ” means (i) a Bank, (ii) an Affiliate of a Bank, or (iii) a commercial bank, a savings bank or other financial institution that is approved by the Administrative Agent, each Fronting Bank that has Issued an outstanding Letter of Credit at the time any assignment is effected pursuant to Section   10.07 , the Swingline Bank and, unless an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing at the time any assignment is effected pursuant to Section   10.07 , the Parent (such approvals not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed); provided , that (a) neither any Borrower nor any Affiliate of a Borrower shall qualify as an Eligible Assignee under this definition, (b) no Person that is a Non-Qualifying Bank may be an Eligible Assignee, as more fully described in Section 10.07(j) , unless the Obligations have become due and payable (at maturity, by acceleration or otherwise) and (c) no Person that is a Non-NAIC Bank may be an Eligible Assignee unless a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank shall have agreed to be a fronting bank on behalf of such Non-NAIC Bank with respect to Syndicated Letters of Credit.
EMU Legislation ” means the legislative measures of the European Union for the introduction of, changeover to or operation of the Euro in one or more member states.
Environmental Action ” means any action, suit, demand, demand letter, claim, notice of non‑compliance or violation, notice of liability or potential liability, investigation, proceeding,

9    



consent order or consent agreement relating in any way to any Environmental Law, any Environmental Permit or Hazardous Material or arising from alleged injury or threat to health, safety or the environment, including (a) by any governmental or regulatory authority for enforcement, cleanup, removal, response, remedial or other actions or damages and (b) by any governmental or regulatory authority or third party for damages, contribution, indemnification, cost recovery, compensation or injunctive relief.
Environmental Law ” means any federal, state, local or foreign statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, code, order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree or judicial or agency interpretation, policy or guidance relating to pollution or protection of the environment, health, safety or natural resources, including those relating to the use, handling, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal, release or discharge of Hazardous Materials.
Environmental Permit ” means any permit, approval, identification number, license or other authorization required under any Environmental Law.
Equity Interests ” means, with respect to any Person, shares of capital stock of (or other ownership or profit interests in) such Person, warrants, options or other rights for the purchase or other acquisition from such Person of shares of capital stock of (or other ownership or profit interests in) such Person, securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock of (or other ownership or profit interests in) such Person or warrants, rights or options for the purchase or other acquisition from such Person of such shares (or such other interests), and other ownership or profit interests in such Person (including partnership, member or trust interests therein), whether voting or nonvoting, and whether or not such shares, warrants, options, rights or other interests are authorized or otherwise existing on any date of determination.
ERISA ” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
ERISA Affiliate ” means any Person that for purposes of Title IV of ERISA is a member of the controlled group of any Borrower, or under common control with any Borrower, within the meaning of Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code or Section 4001 of ERISA.
Euro ” means the single Currency of Participating Member States of the European Union.
Events of Default ” has the meaning specified in Section   7.01 .
Excluded Taxes ” means any of the following Taxes imposed on or with respect to a recipient or required to be withheld or deducted from a payment to a recipient, (a) Taxes imposed on or measured by net income (however denominated), franchise Taxes, and branch profits Taxes, in each case, (i) imposed as a result of such recipient being organized under the laws of, or having its principal office or, in the case of any Bank, its Applicable Lending Office located in, the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (or any political subdivision thereof) or (ii) that are Other Connection Taxes, (b) in the case of a Bank, withholding Taxes imposed on amounts payable to or for the account of such Bank with respect to an applicable interest in a Loan or Commitment pursuant to a law in effect on the date on which (i) such Bank acquires such interest in the Loan

10    



or Commitment (other than pursuant to an assignment request by any Borrower pursuant to Section 2.18 ) or (ii) such Bank changes its lending office, except in each case to the extent that, pursuant to Section 2.16 , amounts with respect to such Taxes were payable either to such Bank's assignor immediately before such Bank became a party hereto or to such Bank immediately before it changed its lending office, (c) Taxes attributable to such recipient’s failure to comply with Section 2.16(f) and (d) any U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed under FATCA.
Existing Credit Agreement ” means the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2007, among the Parent, ACE Bermuda, Tempest, ACE INA, the banks and other lenders identified therein and JPMorgan as administrative agent.
Existing Letters of Credit ” means those letters of credit set forth on Schedule II and continued under this Agreement pursuant to 3.03 .
Existing Reimbursement Agreement ” means the Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2007, among the Parent, ACE Bermuda, Tempest, Tempest Life, the banks and other lenders identified therein, and Wells Fargo as administrative agent.
FATCA ” means Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Internal Revenue Code, as of the date of this Agreement (or any amended or successor version that is substantively comparable and not materially more onerous to comply with), any current or future regulations or official interpretations thereof and any agreements entered into pursuant to Section 1471(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Federal Funds Rate ” means, for any day, a rate per annum equal to the weighted average of the rates on overnight federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by federal funds brokers, as published for such day (or, if such day is not a Business Day, for the next preceding Business Day) by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day that is a Business Day, the average of the quotations for such day for such transactions received by the Administrative Agent from three federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by it.
Fee Letters ” means any letter agreement between the Parent and the Administrative Agent, a Joint Lead Arranger, a Fronting Bank and/or a Non-NAIC Bank with respect to fees payable in connection with this Agreement.
Fiscal Year ” means the fiscal year of the Parent and its Consolidated Subsidiaries ending on December 31 st in any calendar year.
Foreign Currency ” means, at any time, (A) with respect to Participated Letters of Credit, (i) Pounds Sterling, (ii) Euros, (iii) Yen, (iv) Canadian Dollars, (v) South African Rand, (vi) Hong Kong Dollars and (vii) any other lawful Currency that is freely transferable and freely convertible into Dollars and is acceptable to the Administrative Agent and the applicable Issuing Bank(s); and (B) with respect to Syndicated Letters of Credit, (i) each Foreign Currency set forth in the preceding

11    



clauses (A)(i) through (A)(iv), and any other Foreign Currency that satisfies the requirements of the preceding clause (A)(vii).
Foreign Currency Equivalent ” means, with respect to an amount of Dollars or an amount denominated in Dollars, the equivalent of such amount in the applicable Foreign Currency as determined by the Administrative Agent at such time on the basis of the Spot Rate (determined in respect of the most recent Revaluation Date) for the purchase of such Foreign Currency with Dollars.
Foreign Government Scheme or Arrangement ” has the meaning specified in Section   5.01(l)(ii) .
Foreign Plan ” has the meaning specified in Section   5.01(l)(ii) .
Fronting Bank ” means, as applicable, (i) with respect to Participated Letters of Credit, (x) any of Wells Fargo, Citibank and JPMorgan, as applicable, in its capacity as an issuer of Participated Letters of Credit, and (y) any other Bank reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent which is requested by the applicable Borrower, and which agrees in its sole discretion in writing, to Issue Participated Letters of Credit and (ii) with respect to Syndicated Letters of Credit, any Non-NAIC Fronting Bank.
Fronting Exposure ” means, at any time there is a Defaulting Bank, (i) with respect to any Fronting Bank, such Defaulting Bank’s Letter of Credit Exposure with respect to Letters of Credit Issued by the Fronting Bank or fronted by the Fronting Bank on behalf of such Defaulting Bank other than such portion of such Defaulting Bank’s Letter of Credit Exposure as to which such Defaulting Bank’s participation obligation has been reallocated to other Banks or Cash Collateralized in accordance with the terms hereof and (ii) with respect to any Swingline Bank, such Defaulting Bank’s Swingline Exposure with respect to outstanding Swingline Loans made by the Swingline Bank other than Swingline Loans as to which such Defaulting Bank’s participation obligation has been reallocated to other Banks in accordance with the terms hereof.
GAAP ” has the meaning specified in Section   1.03 .
Governmental Authority ” means the government of the United States, Bermuda, Switzerland or any other nation, or of any political subdivision thereof, whether state or local, and any agency, authority, instrumentality, regulatory body, self-regulatory body, court, central bank or other entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, taxing, regulatory or administrative powers or functions of or pertaining to government (including any supra-national bodies such as the European Union or the European Central Bank).
Guaranty ” means the undertaking by the Parent under Article VIII .
Guidelines ” means, collectively, guideline S-02.123 in relation to interbank loans of 22 September 1986 ( Merkblatt "Verrechnungssteuer auf Zinsen von Bankguthaben, deren Gläubiger Banken sind (Interbankguthaben)" vom 22. September 1986 ), guideline S-02.122.1 in relation to bonds of April 1999 ( Merkblatt "Obligationen" vom April 1999 ), guideline S-02.130.1

12    



in relation to money market instruments and accounts receivable of April 1999 ( Merkblatt vom April 1999 betreffend Geldmarktpapiere und Buchforderungen inländischer Schuldner ), guideline S-02.128 in relation to syndicated credit facilities of January 2000 ( Merkblatt "Steuerliche Behandlung von Konsortialdarlehen, Schuldscheindarlehen, Wechseln und Unterbeteiligungen" vom Januar 2000 ), circular letter no. 34 in relation to customer credit balances of 26 July 2011 ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 34 vom 26. Juli 2011 betreffend "Kundenguthaben" ) and the circular letter No. 15 of 7 February 2007 (1-015-DVS-2007) in relation to bonds and derivative financial instruments as subject matter of taxation of Swiss federal income tax, Swiss withholding tax and Swiss stamp taxes ( Kreisschreiben Nr. 15 "Obligationen und derivative Finanzinstrumente als Gegenstand der direkten Bundessteuer, der Verrechnungssteuer und der Stempelabgaben" vom 7. Februar 2007 ), in each case as issued, amended or replaced from time to time, by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration or as substituted or superseded and overruled by any law, statute, ordinance, court decision, regulation or the like as in force from time to time.
Hazardous Materials ” means (a) petroleum or petroleum products, by-products or breakdown products, radioactive materials, asbestos-containing materials, polychlorinated biphenyls and radon gas and (b) any other chemicals, materials or substances designated, classified or regulated as hazardous or toxic or as a pollutant or contaminant under any Environmental Law.
Hedge Agreements ” means interest rate swap, cap or collar agreements, interest rate future or option contracts, currency swap agreements, currency future or option contracts and other hedging agreements.
Hong Kong Dollars ” means the Currency of Hong Kong.
Increasing Bank ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.19(a) .
Indemnified Party ” has the meaning specified in Section   10.04(b) .
Indemnified Taxes ” means (a) Taxes, other than Excluded Taxes, imposed on or with respect to any payment made by or on account of any obligation of any Borrower under any Loan Document and (b) to the extent not otherwise described in clause (a), Other Taxes.
Initial Banks ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Initial Loans ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.19(d) .
Interest Period ” means, as to each LIBOR Loan, the period commencing on the date of the Borrowing of such LIBOR Loan (or the date of any continuation of, or conversion into, such LIBOR Loan), and ending one, two, three or six months (or, if acceptable to all of the Banks, nine or twelve months) thereafter, as selected by the applicable Borrower in its Notice of Borrowing or Notice of Conversion/Continuation; provided , that:

13    



(i)      all LIBOR Loans comprising a single Borrowing shall at all times have the same Interest Period;
(ii)      each successive Interest Period applicable to a LIBOR Loan shall commence on the day on which the next preceding Interest Period applicable thereto expires;
(iii)      LIBOR Loans may not be outstanding under more than ten (10) separate Interest Periods at any one time (for which purpose Interest Periods shall be deemed to be separate even if they are coterminous);
(iv)      if any Interest Period otherwise would expire on a day that is not a Business Day, such Interest Period shall expire on the next succeeding Business Day unless such next succeeding Business Day falls in another calendar month, in which case such Interest Period shall expire on the next preceding Business Day;
(v)      no Interest Period shall extend beyond the Maturity Date; and
(vi)      if any Interest Period begins on a day for which there is no numerically corresponding day in the calendar month during which such Interest Period would otherwise expire, such Interest Period shall expire on the last Business Day of such calendar month.
Internal Revenue Code ” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Investment ” in any Person means any loan or advance to such Person, any purchase or other acquisition of any Equity Interests or Debt or the assets comprising a division or business unit or a substantial part or all of the business of such Person, any capital contribution to such Person or any other direct or indirect investment in such Person, including any acquisition by way of a merger or consolidation and any arrangement pursuant to which the investor incurs Debt of the types referred to in clause (h) or (i) of the definition of “Debt” in respect of such Person; provided , however , that any purchase by any Borrower or any Subsidiary of any catastrophe-linked instruments which are (x) issued for the purpose of transferring traditional reinsurance risk to the capital markets and (y) purchased by such Borrower or Subsidiary in accordance with its customary reinsurance underwriting procedures, or the entry by any Borrower or any Subsidiary into swap instruments relating to such instruments in accordance with such procedures, shall be deemed to be the entry by such Person into a reinsurance contract and shall not be deemed to be an Investment by such Person.
Issue ” means, with respect to any Letter of Credit, to issue, to amend in a manner which extends the expiry of, or to renew or increase the Stated Amount of, such Letter of Credit; and the terms “ Issued ”, “ Issuing ” and “ Issuance ” have corresponding meanings, provided that the term “Issue” shall not include the automatic renewal of a Letter of Credit in accordance with its terms.

14    



Issuing Bank ” means (i) with respect to any Participated Letter of Credit, the applicable Fronting Bank and (ii) with respect to a Syndicated Letter of Credit, the Banks (other than the Non-NAIC Banks, but including the applicable Non-NAIC Fronting Banks, if any) who have Issued such Syndicated Letter of Credit.
JPMorgan ” means JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Joint Lead Arrangers ” means Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, collectively.
Judgment Currency ” has the meaning specified in Section   10.15 .
L/C Advance ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.02(e) .
L/C Agent ” means Wells Fargo, and its successors and permitted assigns in such capacity.
L/C Disbursement ” means (i) with respect to any Participated Letter of Credit, a payment made by the applicable Fronting Bank pursuant thereto and (ii) with respect to any Syndicated Letter of Credit, a payment made by an Issuing Bank pursuant thereto.
L/C Disbursement Date ” means, with respect to each L/C Disbursement made under any Letter of Credit, if the applicable Borrower receives notice from the Administrative Agent of any L/C Disbursement prior to 11:00 a.m. on a Business Day, such Business Day and if such notice is received after 11:00 a.m. on such Business Day, the following Business Day.
L/C Maturity Date ” means the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the Maturity Date and (ii) the first date after the Maturity Date on which the aggregate Letter of Credit Exposure is zero; provided that if such date is not a Business Day, the L/C Maturity Date shall be the immediately preceding Business Day.
Letter of Credit ” means any standby letter of credit Issued hereunder, whether Issued as a Syndicated Letter of Credit or Participated Letter of Credit, including the Existing Letters of Credit, and “ Letters of Credit ” means all of the foregoing.
Letter of Credit Documents ” means, with respect to any Letter of Credit, collectively, such Letter of Credit and any application therefor and any other documents attached thereto.
Letter of Credit Exposure ” means, at any time for each Bank, such Bank’s Pro Rata Share, as adjusted pursuant to Section 2.20(a)(iv) , of the amount equal to the sum at such time of (i) the aggregate Stated Amount of all outstanding Letters of Credit and (ii) the aggregate Dollar Amount of all outstanding Reimbursement Obligations.
Letter of Credit Fee ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.09(c) .
Letter of Credit Notice ” means a Syndicated Letter of Credit Notice or a Participated Letter of Credit Notice, as the context may require.

15    



LIBOR Loan ” means, at any time, any Revolving Loan that bears interest at such time at the Adjusted LIBOR Rate.
LIBOR Rate ” means, with respect to each LIBOR Loan comprising part of the same Borrowing for any Interest Period, (i) the rate per annum appearing on Reuters Screen LIBOR01 Page (or any successor page) that represents an average British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rate for Dollar deposits or (ii) if no such rate is available, the rate of interest determined by the Administrative Agent to be the rate or the arithmetic mean of rates at which Dollar deposits in immediately available funds are offered to first-tier banks in the London interbank Eurodollar market, in each case under clauses (i) and (ii) above at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, two Business Days prior to the first day of such Interest Period for a period substantially equal to such Interest Period and in an amount substantially equal to the amount of Wells Fargo’s LIBOR Loan comprising part of such Borrowing.
Lien ” means any lien, security interest or other charge or encumbrance of any kind, or any other type of preferential arrangement, including the lien or retained security title of a conditional vendor and any easement, right of way or other encumbrance on title to real property.
Loan Documents ” means this Agreement, the Notes, the Letter of Credit Documents, any Fee Letter and any additional agreement, instrument or document delivered in connection with this Agreement that the Parent and the Administrative Agent agree shall constitute a “Loan Document” hereunder.
Loans ” means any or all of the Revolving Loans and the Swingline Loans.
Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Securities ” means units comprised of (i) Preferred Securities or preferred shares of Parent and (ii) a contract for the sale of ordinary shares of the Parent.
Margin Stock ” has the meaning specified in Regulation U.
Material Adverse Change ” means any material adverse change in the business, condition, operations or properties of the Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Material Adverse Effect ” means a material adverse effect on (a) the business, condition, operations or properties of the Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (b) the rights and remedies of the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Bank under any Loan Document or (c) the ability of the Borrowers, taken as a whole, to perform their obligations under the Loan Documents.
Material Financial Obligation ” means a principal amount of Debt and/or payment obligations in respect of any Hedge Agreement of the Parent and/or one or more of its Subsidiaries arising in one or more related or unrelated transactions exceeding in the aggregate $100,000,000.

16    



Material Subsidiary ” means (i) any Subsidiary of the Parent that has more than $10,000,000 in assets or that had more than $10,000,000 of revenue during the most recent period of four fiscal quarters for which financial statements are available, and (ii) any Subsidiary that is the direct or indirect parent company of any Subsidiary that qualified as a “Material Subsidiary” under clause (i) above.
Maturity Date ” shall mean November 6, 2017 or such earlier date of termination of the Commitments pursuant to Section 2.05 or Section 7.01 .
Minimum Amount ” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.04(b) .
Moody’s ” means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
Multiemployer Plan ” means a multiemployer plan, as defined in Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA, to which any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate is making or accruing an obligation to make contributions, or has within any of the preceding five plan years made or accrued an obligation to make contributions.
NAIC ” means the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Net Proceeds ” means, with respect to any issuance of Equity Interests by any Person, the amount of cash received by such Person in connection with such transaction after deducting therefrom the aggregate, without duplication, of the following amounts to the extent properly attributable to such transaction: (a) reasonable brokerage commissions, attorneys’ fees, finder’s fees, financial advisory fees, accounting fees, underwriting fees, investment banking fees, and other similar commissions, and fees and expenses and disbursements of any of the foregoing, in each case to the extent paid or payable by such Person; (b) printing and related expenses of filing and recording or registration fees or charges or similar fees or charges paid by such Person; and (c) taxes paid or payable by such Person to any Governmental Authority as a result of such transaction.
Nonconsenting Bank ” means any Bank that does not approve a consent, waiver or amendment to any Loan Document requested by any Borrower or the Administrative Agent and that requires the approval of all Banks under Section 10.01 (or all Banks directly affected thereby) when the Super-Majority Banks have agreed to such consent, waiver or amendment.
Non-NAIC Bank ” means a Bank that is not listed on the most current list of banks approved by the Securities Valuation Officer of the NAIC or is not acting through the branch so listed.
Non-NAIC Fronting Bank ” means a Bank reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent which is requested by the applicable Borrower, and which agrees in its sole discretion in writing, to be a fronting bank on behalf of a Non-NAIC Bank pursuant to Section 3.01(h) .
Non-Qualifying Bank ” means a Person that is not a Qualifying Bank.
Notes ” means any or all of the Revolving Notes and the Swingline Note.

17    



Notice of Borrowing ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.02(a) .
Notice of Conversion/Continuation ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.10(b) .
Notice of Swingline Borrowing ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.02(c) .
Obligations ” means all principal of and interest on the Loans and Reimbursement Obligations and all fees, expenses, indemnities and other obligations owing, due or payable at any time by any Borrower to the Administrative Agent, any Bank, the L/C Agent, any Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank or any other Person entitled thereto (including interest or fees accruing after the filing of a petition or commencement of a case by or with respect to any Borrower seeking relief under any Bankruptcy Law, whether or not the claim for such interest or fees is allowed in such proceeding), under this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, in each case whether direct or indirect, joint or several, absolute or contingent, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, secured or unsecured, and whether existing by contract, operation of law or otherwise.
OFAC ” means the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, and any successor thereto.
Other Connection Taxes ” means, with respect to any recipient, Taxes imposed as a result of a present or former connection between such recipient and the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (other than connections arising from such recipient having executed, delivered, become a party to, performed its obligations under, received payments under, received or perfected a security interest under, engaged in any other transaction pursuant to or enforced any Loan Document, or sold or assigned an interest in any Obligation or Loan Document).
Other Taxes ” means all present or future stamp, court or documentary, intangible, recording, filing or similar Taxes that arise from any payment made under, from the execution, delivery, performance, enforcement or registration of, from the receipt or perfection of a security interest under, or otherwise with respect to, this Agreement or any other Loan Document.
Parent ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Participant Register ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 10.07(g) .
Participated L/C Honor Date ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.02(f) .
Participated Letter of Credit Notice ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.02(b) .
Participated Letters of Credit ” means (a) Letters of Credit Issued by any Fronting Bank (other than any Non-NAIC Fronting Bank) under Section 3.02(a) and (b) the Existing Letters of Credit.

18    



Participating Member State ” means any member state of the European Community that adopts or has adopted the Euro as its Currency in accordance with the legislation of the European Community relating to the Economic and Monetary Union.
Patriot Act ” means the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT Act, Title III of Pub. L. 107-56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)).
PBGC ” means the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (or any successor).
Pension Plan ” means a “pension plan”, as such term is defined in section 3(2) of ERISA, which is subject to title IV of ERISA (other than any “multiemployer plan” as such term is defined in section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA), and to which any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate may have any liability, including any liability by reason of having been a substantial employer within the meaning of section 4063 of ERISA at any time during the preceding five years, or by reason of being deemed to be a contributing sponsor under section 4069 of ERISA.
Permitted Liens ” means such of the following as to which no enforcement, collection, execution, levy or foreclosure proceeding shall have been commenced or which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings: (a) Liens for taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies not yet due and payable; (b) Liens imposed by law, such as materialmen’s, mechanics’, carriers’, workmen’s and repairmen’s Liens and other similar Liens arising in the ordinary course of business securing obligations that are not overdue for a period of more than 90 days; (c) pledges or deposits to secure obligations under workers’ compensation laws or similar legislation or to secure public or statutory obligations; and (d) easements, rights of way and other encumbrances on title to real property that do not render title to the property encumbered thereby unmarketable or materially adversely affect the use of such property for its present purposes.
Person ” means an individual, partnership, corporation (including a business trust), limited liability company, joint stock company, trust, unincorporated association, joint venture or other entity, or a government or any political subdivision or agency thereof.
Pounds Sterling ” means the Currency of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Preferred Interests ” means, with respect to any Person, Equity Interests issued by such Person that are entitled to a preference or priority over any other Equity Interests issued by such Person upon any distribution of such Person’s property and assets, whether by dividend or upon liquidation.
Preferred Securities ” means (i) preferred securities issued by a Special Purpose Trust which shall provide, among other things, that dividends shall be payable only out of proceeds of interest payments on the Debentures, or (ii) other instruments that are treated in whole or in part as equity by one or more of S&P and Moody’s (or any successor to any of the foregoing) while being treated as debt for tax purposes.

19    



Pro Rata Share ” of any amount means, as adjusted pursuant to Section 2.20(a)(iv) , at any time for each Bank, a percentage obtained by dividing such Bank’s Commitment at such time by the aggregate Commitments then in effect, provided that, if the Maturity Date has occurred, the Pro Rata Share of each Bank shall be determined by dividing such Bank’s Credit Exposure by the aggregate Credit Exposure of all Banks then outstanding.
Public Debt Rating ” means, as of any date, the higher rating that has been most recently announced by either S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, as the Parent’s long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent); provided that if at any time the difference between the ratings of such type most recently announced by S&P and Moody’s is more than one rating grade, the Public Debt Rating shall be the rating that is one grade below the higher of such two ratings. For purposes of the foregoing, (a) if only one of S&P and Moody’s shall have in effect a long-term foreign issuer credit rating (or its equivalent) for the Parent, the Public Debt Rating shall be the available rating; (b) if any rating established by S&P or Moody’s shall be changed, such change shall be effective for purposes of this Agreement as of ten Business Days following the date on which such change is first announced publicly by the rating agency making such change; and (c) if S&P or Moody’s shall change the basis on which ratings are established, each reference herein to ratings announced by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be, shall refer to the then equivalent rating by S&P or Moody’s, as the case may be.
Qualifying Bank ” means a Person that conducts effectively banking activities, with its own infrastructure and staff, as its principal business purpose and that has a banking license in full force and effect issued in accordance with the banking laws of its jurisdiction of organization or, if acting through a branch, issued in accordance with the banking laws in the jurisdiction of such branch.
Redeemable ” means, with respect to any Equity Interest, any Debt or any other right or obligation, any such Equity Interest, Debt, right or obligation that (a) the issuer has undertaken to redeem at a fixed or determinable date or dates, whether by operation of a sinking fund or otherwise, or upon the occurrence of a condition not solely within the control of the issuer or (b) is redeemable at the option of the holder.
Refunded Swingline Loans ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.02(d) .
Register ” has the meaning specified in Section   10.07(d) .
Regulation U ” means Regulation U of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as in effect from time to time.
Reimbursement Obligations ” means the obligation of the applicable Borrower to reimburse the applicable Issuing Banks for any payment actually made by such Issuing Banks under any Letter of Credit, together with interest thereon payable as provided herein.
Related Parties ” means, with respect to any Person, such Person’s Affiliates and the partners, directors, officers, employees, agents trustees, administrators, managers, advisors and representatives of such Person and of such Person’s Affiliates.

20    



Required Banks ” means, at any time, Banks owed or holding at least a majority in interest of the aggregate Credit Exposure (excluding Swingline Loans) outstanding at such time, or, if there is no Credit Exposure outstanding at such time, Banks having Commitments constituting at least a majority in interest of the aggregate of the Commitments; provided , that the Commitment of, and the portion of the outstanding Credit Exposure held or deemed held by, any Defaulting Bank shall be excluded for purposes of making a determination of Required Banks.
Responsible Officer ” means the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer or General Counsel of the Parent.
Revaluation Date ” means each of the following: (i) each date on which a Letter of Credit is Issued in a Foreign Currency, (ii) each date of a decrease in the Stated Amount of a Letter of Credit Issued in a Foreign Currency, (iii) each date on which an L/C Disbursement is made in a Foreign Currency, (iv) the last Business Day of each calendar month, (v) the Maturity Date, (vi) each day on which the Commitments are to be reduced pursuant to Section 2.05 (it being understood that no requested reduction shall be permitted to the extent that such reduction would be greater than the unused portion of the Commitments), and (vii) such additional dates as the Administrative Agent shall specify in writing to each of the parties hereto.
Revolver Sublimit ” means $300,000,000 or, if less, the aggregate Commitments. The Revolver Sublimit is part of, and not in addition to, the aggregate Commitments.
Revolving Loans ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.01 .
Revolving Notes ” means with respect to any Bank requesting the same, the promissory note of each Borrower in favor of such Bank evidencing the Revolving Loans made by such Bank to such Borrower pursuant to Section 2.01 , in substantially the form of Exhibit A-1 .
S&P ” means Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw‑Hill Companies, Inc.
Sanctioned Country ” means a country subject to a sanctions program identified on the list maintained by OFAC and available at http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/programs/ , or as otherwise published from time to time.
Sanctioned Person ” means (i) a Person named on the list of Specially Designated Nationals or Blocked Persons maintained by OFAC available at http://www.treas.gov/-offices/enforcement/ofac/sdn/index.shtml , or as otherwise published from time to time, or (ii) (A) an agency of the government of a Sanctioned Country, (B) an organization controlled by a Sanctioned Country, or (C) a Person resident in a Sanctioned Country, to the extent subject to a sanctions program administered by OFAC.
Securitization Transaction ” means any sale, assignment or other transfer by Parent or any Subsidiary of any accounts receivable, premium finance loan receivables, lease receivables or other payment obligations owing to Parent or such Subsidiary or any interest in any of the

21    



foregoing, together in each case with any collections and other proceeds thereof, any collection or deposit accounts related thereto, and any collateral, guaranties or other property or claims in favor of Parent or such Subsidiary supporting or securing payment by the obligor thereon of, or otherwise related to, any such receivables.
Significant Subsidiary ” means a Subsidiary of Parent that is a “significant subsidiary” of the Parent under Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Solvent ” and “ Solvency ” mean, with respect to any Person on a particular date, that on such date (a) the fair value of the property of such Person is greater than the total amount of liabilities, including contingent liabilities, of such Person, (b) the present fair salable value of the assets of such Person is not less than the amount that will be required to pay the probable liability of such Person on its debts as they become absolute and matured, (c) such Person does not intend to, and does not believe that it will, incur debts or liabilities beyond such Person’s ability to pay such debts and liabilities as they mature and (d) such Person is not engaged in business or a transaction, and is not about to engage in business or a transaction, for which such Person’s property would constitute an unreasonably small capital. The amount of contingent liabilities at any time shall be computed as the amount that, in the light of all the facts and circumstances existing at such time, represents the amount that can reasonably be expected to become an actual or matured liability.
South African Rand ” means the Currency of South Africa.
Special Purpose Trust ” means a special purpose business trust established by the Parent or ACE INA of which the Parent or ACE INA will hold all the common securities, which will be the issuer of the Preferred Securities, and which will loan to the Parent or ACE INA (such loan being evidenced by the Debentures) the net proceeds of the issuance and sale of the Preferred Securities and common securities of such Special Purpose Trust.
Spot Rate ” means (i) with respect to any Foreign Currency, the rate quoted by the Administrative Agent as the spot rate for the purchase by the Administrative Agent of such Foreign Currency with Dollars through its principal foreign exchange trading office at approximately 11:00 a.m. London time on the date two Business Days prior to the date as of which the foreign exchange computation is made, and (ii) with respect to Dollar Amounts, the rate quoted by the Administrative Agent as the spot rate for the purchase by the Administrative Agent of such Dollar Amount with such applicable Foreign Currency through its principal foreign exchange trading office at approximately 11:00 a.m. London time on the date two Business Days prior to the date as of which the foreign exchange computation is made; provided , that in each case of clause (i) and (ii), if no such rate is available through the Administrative Agent’s principal foreign exchange trading office, then the “Spot Rate” shall be the spot rate reasonably determined by the Administrative Agent in accordance with its customary foreign exchange practices.
Stated Amount ” means, with respect to any Letter of Credit at any time, the aggregate Dollar Amount available to be drawn thereunder at such time (regardless of whether any conditions for drawing could then be met).

22    



Subsequent Borrowings ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.19(d) .
Subsidiary ” of any Person means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, trust or estate of which (or in which) more than 50% of (a) the issued and outstanding capital stock having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the Board of Directors of such corporation (irrespective of whether at the time capital stock of any other class or classes of such corporation shall or might have voting power upon the occurrence of any contingency), (b) the interest in the capital or profits of such partnership, joint venture or limited liability company or (c) the beneficial interest in such trust or estate is at the time directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person, by such Person and one or more of its other Subsidiaries or by one or more of such Person’s other Subsidiaries.
Super-Majority Banks ” means, at any time, Banks holding at least two-thirds in interest of the aggregate Credit Exposure outstanding at such time, or, if there is no Credit Exposure outstanding at such time, Banks having Commitments constituting at least two-thirds in interest of the aggregate Commitments; provided , that the Commitment of, and the portion of the outstanding Credit Exposure held or deemed held by, any Defaulting Bank shall be excluded for purposes of making a determination of Super-Majority Banks.
Swingline Bank ” means Wells Fargo in its capacity as maker of Swingline Loans, and its successors in such capacity.
Swingline Commitment ” means $50,000,000 or, if less, the aggregate Commitments. The Swingline Commitment is part of, and not in addition to, the aggregate Commitments and the Revolver Sublimit.
Swingline Exposure ” means, with respect to any Bank at any time, its maximum aggregate liability to make Refunded Swingline Loans pursuant to Section 2.02(d) to refund, or to purchase participations pursuant to Section 2.02(e) in, Swingline Loans that are outstanding at such time.
Swingline Loans ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.02(c) .
Swingline Maturity Date ” means the fifth Business Day prior to the Maturity Date.
Swingline Note ” means, if requested by the Swingline Bank, the promissory note of each Borrower in favor of the Swingline Bank evidencing the Swingline Loans made by the Swingline Bank pursuant to Section 2.02(c) , in substantially the form of Exhibit A-2 .
Swiss Withholding Tax ” means Swiss anticipatory tax ( Verrechnungssteuer ).
Syndicated L/C Honor Date ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.01(g) .
Syndicated Letter of Credit Notice ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.01(b) .

23    



Syndicated Letters of Credit ” means Letters of Credit Issued under Section 3.01(a) , which shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit D or in such other form as is satisfactory to the L/C Agent in its sole discretion.
Syndication Agents ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Taxes ” means all present or future taxes, levies, imposts, duties, deductions, withholdings (including backup withholding), assessments, fees or other charges imposed by any Governmental Authority, including any interest, additions to tax or penalties applicable thereto.
Tempest ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Tempest Life ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Ten Non-Bank Rule ” means the rule that not more than ten creditors (within the meaning of the Guidelines) under this Agreement may be Non-Qualifying Banks without triggering Swiss Withholding Tax, all in accordance with the Guidelines.
Total Capitalization ” means, at any time, an amount (without duplication) equal to (i) the then outstanding Consolidated Debt of the Parent and its Subsidiaries plus (ii) Consolidated stockholders equity of the Parent and its Subsidiaries (without duplication), plus (iii) the then issued and outstanding amount of Preferred Securities (including Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Securities) and (without duplication) Debentures.
Transfer ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 10.07(j)(ii) .
Transferee ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 10.07(j)(ii) .
Transferor ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 10.07(j)(ii) .
Twenty Non-Bank Rule ” means the rule that (without duplication) the aggregate number of creditors (including the Banks), which are Non-Qualifying Banks, of the Parent under all its outstanding debts relevant for classification as debenture ( Kassenobligation ) (including Debt arising under this Agreement and intra-group loans (if and to the extent intra-group loans are not exempt in accordance with art. 14a of the Swiss Federal Ordinance on Withholding Tax), loans, facilities and/or private placements (including under the Loan Documents)) must not at any time exceed 20, in each case in accordance within the meaning of the Guidelines.
Type ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 2.02(a) .
United States ” and “ U.S. ” mean the United States of America.
Unreimbursed Amount ” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.01(g) .
Unused Commitment ” means, with respect to any Bank at any time, such Bank’s Commitment at such time minus the sum at such time of (i) the outstanding principal amount of

24    



such Bank’s Revolving Loans, (ii) such Bank’s Letter of Credit Exposure and (iii) such Bank’s Swingline Exposure.
Unused Swingline Commitment ” means, with respect to the Swingline Bank at any time, the Swingline Commitment at such time less the aggregate principal amount of all Swingline Loans that are outstanding at such time.
U.S. Person ” means any Person (i) organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches thereof) or (ii) located in the United States.
Voting Interests ” means shares of capital stock issued by a corporation, or equivalent Equity Interests in any other Person, the holders of which are ordinarily, in the absence of contingencies, entitled to vote for the election of directors (or persons performing similar functions) of such Person, even if the right so to vote has been suspended by the happening of such a contingency.
Welfare Plan ” means a welfare plan, as defined in Section 3(1) of ERISA, that is maintained for employees of any Borrower or in respect of which any Borrower could have liability.
Wells Fargo ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Wholly Owned Subsidiary ” means a Subsidiary of the Parent of which all outstanding Equity Interests (excluding in the case of a foreign Subsidiary only, any directors’ qualifying shares and shares required to be held by foreign nationals) are owned by the Parent and/or another Wholly Owned Subsidiary.
Withdrawal Liability ” has the meaning specified in Part I of Subtitle E of Title IV of ERISA.
Yen ” means the Currency of Japan.
1.02      Computation of Time Periods; Other Definitional Provisions . In this Agreement and the other Loan Documents in the computation of periods of time from a specified date to a later specified date, the word “from” means “from and including” and the words “to” and “until” each mean “to but excluding”. References in the Loan Documents to (a) any agreement or contract shall mean such agreement or contract as amended, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time; and (b) any law shall mean such law as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time (including any successor thereto) and all rules, regulations, guidelines and decisions interpreting or implementing such law. The term “including” means “including without limitation” and derivatives of such term have a corresponding meaning.
1.03      Accounting Terms and Determinations . Unless otherwise specified herein, all accounting terms used herein shall be interpreted, all accounting determinations hereunder shall

25    



be made, and all financial statements required to be delivered hereunder shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as in effect from time to time in the United States (“ GAAP ”), applied on a basis consistent (except for changes concurred in by the Parent’s independent public accountants) with the most recent audited consolidated financial statements of the Parent and its Subsidiaries delivered to the Banks; provided that, if the Parent notifies the Administrative Agent that the Parent wishes to amend any covenant in Article VI to eliminate the effect of any change in generally accepted accounting principles on the operation of such covenant (or if the Administrative Agent notifies the Parent that the Required Banks wish to amend Article VI for such purpose), then the Parent’s compliance with such covenant shall be determined on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles in effect immediately before the relevant change in generally accepted accounting principles became effective (and, concurrently with the delivery of any financial statements required to be delivered hereunder, the Parent shall provide a statement of reconciliation conforming such financial information to such generally accepted accounting principles as previously in effect), until either such notice is withdrawn or such covenant is amended in a manner satisfactory to the Parent and the Required Banks. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of determining compliance with any covenant (including the computation of any financial covenant) contained herein, Debt shall be deemed to be carried at 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof, and the effects of FASB ASC 825 and FASB ASC 470-20 on financial liabilities shall be disregarded.
1.04      Exchange Rates; Currency Equivalents .
(a)      The Administrative Agent shall determine the Spot Rates as of each Revaluation Date to be used for calculating the Dollar Amounts of Letters of Credit denominated in a Foreign Currency and other amounts outstanding under this Agreement denominated in a Foreign Currency. Such Spot Rates shall become effective as of such Revaluation Date and shall be the Spot Rates employed in converting any amounts between the Applicable Currencies until the next Revaluation Date to occur. Except as otherwise provided herein or in any other Loan Document, the applicable amount of any Currency for purposes of this Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall be such Dollar Amount as so determined by the Administrative Agent.
(b)      Wherever in this Agreement, in connection with any Letter of Credit denominated in a Foreign Currency, an amount, such as a required minimum Stated Amount, is expressed in Dollars, such amount shall be the relevant Foreign Currency Equivalent of such Dollar Amount (rounded as nearly as practicable to the nearest number of whole units of such Foreign Currency), as determined by the Administrative Agent.
(c)      Each provision of this Agreement also shall be subject to such reasonable changes of construction as the Administrative Agent may from time to time specify to be appropriate to reflect a change in Currency of any other country and any relevant market conventions or practices relating to the change in Currency to put the parties in the same position, so far as possible, that they would have been in if no change in currency had occurred.
(d)      Determinations by the Administrative Agent pursuant to this Section shall be conclusive absent manifest error.

26    



1.05      Redenomination of Certain Foreign Currencies and Computation of Dollar Amounts .
(a)      If the United Kingdom becomes a participating member state with respect to the Euro, then, in addition to any method of conversion or rounding prescribed by any EMU Legislation, each reference in this Agreement to a fixed amount in a national currency unit to be paid to or by any Bank or the Administrative Agent shall be replaced by a reference to such comparable and convenient fixed amount in the Euro unit as the Administrative Agent may from time to time reasonably specify.
(b)      In the event that any member state of the European Union withdraws its adoption of the Euro and adopts another Currency, the adopted Currency shall not be a Foreign Currency unless it is an existing Foreign Currency.
(c)      This Agreement will, to the extent the Administrative Agent reasonably determines to be necessary, be amended to comply with any other generally accepted conventions and market practices and otherwise to reflect a change in currency of any other country and any relevant market conventions or practices relating to the change in currency, subject to the Parent’s consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed).
(d)      Wherever in this Agreement an amount is expressed in Dollars, it shall be deemed to refer to the Dollar Amount thereof.
1.06      Times of Day . Unless otherwise specified, all references herein to times of day shall be references to Charlotte, North Carolina time (daylight or standard, as applicable).
ARTICLE II     
AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF
THE CREDIT
2.01      Commitments . Upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereof, (i) each Bank (other than a Non-NAIC Bank) agrees from time to time on any Business Day during the Availability Period to Issue Syndicated Letters of Credit for the account of any Borrower or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary; (ii) each Fronting Bank (other than a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank) agrees from time to time on any Business Day during the Availability Period to Issue Participated Letters of Credit for the account of any Borrower or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary, and each Bank hereby agrees to purchase participations in the obligations of such Fronting Bank under such Participated Letters of Credit ( provided that the aggregate Stated Amount of Participated Letters of Credit Issued by, and Reimbursement Obligations thereunder owed to, any Fronting Bank shall not exceed any amount separately agreed to by the Parent and such Fronting Bank) ; (iii) each Bank severally agrees to make loans (each, a “ Revolving Loan ” and collectively, the “ Revolving Loans ”) to any Borrower from time to time on any Business Day during the Availability Period; and (iv) the Swingline Bank agrees to make loans (each, a “ Swingline Loan ” and collectively, the “ Swingline Loans ”) to any Borrower, from time to time on any Business

27    



Day during the period from the Effective Date to but not including the Swingline Maturity Date, in an aggregate principal amount at any time outstanding not exceeding the Swingline Commitment; provided that no Bank shall be obligated to make or participate in any Credit Extension if, immediately after giving effect thereto, (w) the Credit Exposure of such Bank would exceed its Commitment ( provided that Swingline Loans may be made even if the aggregate principal amount of Swingline Loans outstanding at any time, when added to the aggregate principal amount of the Revolving Loans made by the Swingline Bank in its capacity as a Bank outstanding at such time and its Letter of Credit Exposure at such time, would exceed the Swingline Bank’s own Commitment at such time), (x) the aggregate Credit Exposure would exceed the aggregate Commitments at such time, (y) the applicable conditions in Section 3.04 or Section 4.02 are not met or (z) with respect to any Borrowing of Loans, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Loans would exceed the Revolver Sublimit; provided further that the Swingline Bank shall not make any Swingline Loan if any Bank is at that time a Defaulting Bank, unless the Swingline Bank has entered into arrangements, including the delivery of Cash Collateral by such Defaulting Bank, satisfactory to the Swingline Bank (in its sole discretion) to eliminate the Swingline Bank’s actual or potential Fronting Exposure (after giving effect to Section 2.20(a)(iv) ) with respect to such Defaulting Bank arising from either the Swingline Loan then proposed to be made or all other Swingline Loans as to which the Swingline Bank has actual or potential Fronting Exposure to such Bank, as it may elect in its sole discretion. Within the foregoing limits, and subject to and on the terms and conditions hereof, the Borrowers may borrow Loans and obtain Letters of Credit on a revolving basis.
2.02      Borrowings .
(a)      The Loans shall be denominated in Dollars and, at the option of the applicable Borrower, the Revolving Loans shall be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans (each, a “ Type ” of Loan), provided that all Revolving Loans comprising the same Borrowing shall, unless otherwise specifically provided herein, be of the same Type. In order to make a Borrowing (other than (x) Borrowings of Swingline Loans, which shall be made pursuant to Section 2.02(c)) , (y) Borrowings for the purpose of paying Refunded Swingline Loans, which shall be made pursuant to Section 2.02(d) , and (z) continuations or conversions of outstanding Revolving Loans, which shall be made pursuant to Section 2.10 ), the applicable Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent a fully executed, irrevocable notice of borrowing in the form of Exhibit B-1 (the “ Notice of Borrowing ”) no later than 11:00 a.m., three Business Days prior to each Borrowing of LIBOR Loans and not later than 10:00 a.m., on the same Business Day prior to each Borrowing of Base Rate Loans. Upon its receipt of the Notice of Borrowing, the Administrative Agent shall promptly notify each Bank of the proposed borrowing. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein:
(i)      each Borrowing shall be in a principal amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000 (or, if less, in the amount of the aggregate Unused Commitments);

28    



(ii)      if the applicable Borrower shall have failed to designate the Type of Revolving Loans in a Notice of Borrowing, then the Revolving Loans shall be made as Base Rate Loans; and
(iii)      if the applicable Borrower shall have failed to specify an Interest Period to be applicable to any Borrowing of LIBOR Loans, then such Borrower shall be deemed to have selected an Interest Period of one month.
(b)      Not later than 1:00 p.m. on the requested Borrowing Date, each Bank will make available to the Administrative Agent at the Administrative Agent’s Account an amount, in Dollars and in immediately available funds, equal to its Pro Rata Share of such requested Borrowing as its Revolving Loan or Revolving Loans. As promptly as practicable, upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions set forth in Section 4.02 (and, if such Borrowing is the initial Credit Extension, Section 4.01 ), the Administrative Agent shall make all funds so received available to the applicable Borrower in like funds as received by the Administrative Agent in accordance with Section 2.03(a) .
(c)      In order to make a Borrowing of a Swingline Loan, the applicable Borrower will give the Administrative Agent (and the Swingline Bank, if the Swingline Bank is not also the Administrative Agent) written notice not later than 1:00 p.m., on the date of such Borrowing. Each such notice (each, a “ Notice of Swingline Borrowing ”) shall be given in the form of Exhibit B-2 , shall be irrevocable and shall specify (i) the principal amount of the Swingline Loan to be made pursuant to such Borrowing (which shall be $5,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $500,000 (or, if less, in the amount of the Unused Swingline Commitment)) and (ii) the requested Borrowing Date, which shall be a Business Day. Not later than 3:00 p.m., on the requested Borrowing Date, the Swingline Bank will make available to the Administrative Agent at the Administrative Agent’s Account an amount, in Dollars and in immediately available funds, equal to the amount of the requested Swingline Loan. To the extent the Swingline Bank has made such amount available to the Administrative Agent as provided hereinabove, the Administrative Agent will make such amount available to the applicable Borrower in accordance with Section 2.03(a) and in like funds as received by the Administrative Agent. No Swingline Loan may be used to refinance an outstanding Swingline Loan.
(d)      With respect to any outstanding Swingline Loans, the Swingline Bank may at any time (whether or not an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing) in its sole and absolute discretion, and is hereby authorized and empowered by the applicable Borrower to, cause a Borrowing of Revolving Loans to be made for the purpose of repaying such Swingline Loans by delivering to the Administrative Agent (if the Administrative Agent is not also the Swingline Bank) and each other Bank (on behalf of, and with a copy to, the applicable Borrower), not later than 11:00 a.m., one Business Day prior to the proposed Borrowing Date therefor, a notice (which shall be deemed to be a Notice of Borrowing given by the applicable Borrower) requesting the Banks to make Revolving Loans (which shall be made initially as Base Rate Loans) on such Borrowing Date in an aggregate amount equal to the amount of such Swingline Loans (the “ Refunded Swingline Loans ”) outstanding on the date such notice is given that the Swingline Bank requests to be repaid. Not later than 1:00 p.m., on the requested Borrowing

29    



Date, each Bank (other than the Swingline Bank) will make available to the Administrative Agent at the Administrative Agent’s Account an amount, in Dollars and in immediately available funds, equal to the amount of the Revolving Loan to be made by such Bank. To the extent the Banks have made such amounts available to the Administrative Agent as provided hereinabove, the Administrative Agent will make the aggregate of such amounts available to the Swingline Bank in like funds as received by the Administrative Agent, which shall apply such amounts in repayment of the Refunded Swingline Loans. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, on the relevant Borrowing Date, the Refunded Swingline Loans (including the Swingline Bank’s ratable share thereof, in its capacity as a Bank) shall be deemed to be repaid with the proceeds of the Revolving Loans made as provided above (including a Revolving Loan deemed to have been made by the Swingline Bank), and such Refunded Swingline Loans deemed to be so repaid shall no longer be outstanding as Swingline Loans but shall be outstanding as Revolving Loans. If any portion of any such amount repaid (or deemed to be repaid) to the Swingline Bank shall be recovered by or on behalf of the applicable Borrower from the Swingline Bank in any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding or otherwise, the loss of the amount so recovered shall be shared ratably among all the Banks in the manner contemplated by Section 2.14(c) .
(e)      If, as a result of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding with respect to any Borrower, Revolving Loans are not made pursuant to Section 2.02(d) in an amount sufficient to repay any amounts owed to the Swingline Bank in respect of any outstanding Swingline Loans, or if the Swingline Bank is otherwise precluded for any reason from giving a notice on behalf of the applicable Borrower as provided for hereinabove, the Swingline Bank shall be deemed to have sold without recourse, representation or warranty (except for the absence of Liens thereon created, incurred or suffered to exist by, through or under the Swingline Bank), and each Bank shall be deemed to have purchased and hereby agrees to purchase, a participation in such outstanding Swingline Loans in an amount equal to its Pro Rata Share of the unpaid amount thereof together with accrued interest thereon. Upon one Business Day’s prior notice from the Swingline Bank, each Bank (other than the Swingline Bank) will make available to the Administrative Agent at the Administrative Agent’s Account an amount, in Dollars and in immediately available funds, equal to its respective participation. To the extent the Banks have made such amounts available to the Administrative Agent as provided hereinabove, the Administrative Agent will make the aggregate of such amounts available to the Swingline Bank in like funds as received by the Administrative Agent. In the event any such Bank fails to make available to the Administrative Agent the amount of such Bank’s participation as provided in this Section 2.02(e) , the Swingline Bank shall be entitled to recover such amount on demand from such Bank, together with interest thereon for each day from the date such amount is required to be made available for the account of the Swingline Bank until the date such amount is made available to the Swingline Bank at the Federal Funds Rate for the first three Business Days and thereafter at the Adjusted Base Rate applicable to Revolving Loans. Promptly following its receipt of any payment by or on behalf of the applicable Borrower in respect of a Swingline Loan, the Swingline Bank will pay to each Bank that has acquired a participation therein such Bank’s ratable share of such payment.

30    



(f)      Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the obligation of each Bank (other than the Swingline Bank) to make Revolving Loans for the purpose of repaying any Refunded Swingline Loans pursuant to Section 2.02(d) and each such Bank’s obligation to purchase a participation in any unpaid Swingline Loans pursuant to Section 2.02(e) shall be absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstance or event whatsoever, including (i) any set-off, counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other right that such Bank may have against the Swingline Bank, the Administrative Agent, any Borrower or any other Person for any reason whatsoever, (ii) the existence of any Default or Event of Default, (iii) the failure of the amount of such Borrowing of Revolving Loans to meet the minimum Borrowing amount specified in Section 2.02(a) , or (iv) the failure of any conditions set forth in Section 4.02 or elsewhere herein to be satisfied.
2.03      Disbursements; Funding Reliance; Domicile of Loans .
(e)      Each Borrower hereby authorizes the Administrative Agent to disburse the proceeds of each Borrowing it makes in accordance with the terms of any written instructions from any Authorized Officer of such Borrower; provided that the Administrative Agent shall not be obligated under any circumstances to forward amounts to any account not listed in an Account Designation Letter. Any Borrower may at any time deliver to the Administrative Agent an Account Designation Letter listing any additional accounts or deleting any accounts listed in a previous Account Designation Letter.
(f)      Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from a Bank prior to the proposed date of any Borrowing that such Bank will not make available to the Administrative Agent such Bank’s Pro Rata Share of such Borrowing, the Administrative Agent may assume that such Bank has made such share available on such date in accordance with Section 2.02 or 3.02(f) , as applicable, and may (but shall not be so required to), in reliance upon such assumption, make available to the applicable Borrower a corresponding amount. In such event, if a Bank has not in fact made its share of the applicable Borrowing available to the Administrative Agent, then the applicable Bank and the applicable Borrower severally agree to pay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand such corresponding amount with interest thereon, for each day from the date such amount is made available to such Borrower to the date of payment to the Administrative Agent, at (i) in the case of a payment to be made by such Bank, the greater of the Federal Funds Rate and a rate determined by the Administrative Agent in accordance with banking industry rules on interbank compensation and (ii) in the case of a payment to be made by such Borrower, the Adjusted Base Rate. If such Borrower and such Bank shall pay such interest to the Administrative Agent for the same or an overlapping period, the Administrative Agent shall promptly remit to such Borrower the amount of such interest paid by such Borrower for such period. If such Bank pays its Pro Rata Share of the applicable Borrowing to the Administrative Agent, then the amount so paid shall constitute such Bank’s Loan included in such Borrowing. Any payment by any Borrower shall be without prejudice to any claim such Borrower may have against a Bank that shall have failed to make such payment to the Administrative Agent.

31    



(g)      The obligations of the Banks hereunder to make Loans, to fund participations in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans and to make payments pursuant to Section 10.04 are several and not joint. The failure of any Bank to make any such Loan, to fund any such participation or to make any such payment on any date shall not relieve any other Bank of its corresponding obligation, if any, hereunder to do so on such date, but no Bank shall be responsible for the failure of any other Bank to so make its Loan, purchase its participation or to make any such payment required hereunder.
(h)      Each Bank may, at its option, make and maintain any Loan at, to or for the account of any of its Applicable Lending Offices; provided that any exercise of such option shall not affect the obligation of the applicable Borrower to repay such Loan to or for the account of such Bank or otherwise to make payment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
2.04      Evidence of Debt; Notes .
(e)      Each Bank shall maintain in accordance with its usual practice an account or accounts evidencing the indebtedness of each Borrower to the Applicable Lending Office of such Bank resulting from the Credit Extensions made by such Applicable Lending Office of such Bank from time to time, including the amounts of principal and interest payable and paid to such Applicable Lending Office of such Bank from time to time under this Agreement.
(f)      The Administrative Agent shall maintain the Register pursuant to Section 10.07(d) , and a subaccount for each Bank, in which Register and subaccounts (taken together) shall be recorded (i) the amount of each Loan, the Type of each such Loan and the Interest Period applicable thereto, (ii) the date and amount of each applicable Reimbursement Obligation, (iii) the amount of any principal or interest due and payable or to become due and payable from the applicable Borrower to each Bank hereunder in respect of each such Loan or Reimbursement Obligation, and (iv) the amount of any sum received by the Administrative Agent hereunder from the applicable Borrower and each Bank’s Pro Rata Share thereof.
(g)      The entries made in the Register and subaccounts maintained pursuant to Section 2.04(b) (and, if consistent with the entries of the Administrative Agent, the accounts maintained pursuant to Section 2.04(a) ) shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be conclusive evidence of the existence and amounts of the obligations of the applicable Borrower therein recorded absent manifest error; provided , however , that the failure of any Bank or the Administrative Agent to maintain such account, such Register or such subaccount, as applicable, or any error therein, shall not in any manner affect the obligation of each Borrower to repay (with applicable interest) the Obligations of such Borrower under this Agreement.
(h)      The Loans made by each Bank shall, if requested by the applicable Bank (which request shall be made to the Administrative Agent), be evidenced by (i) in the case of Revolving Loans, a Revolving Note and (ii) in the case of the Swingline Loans, a Swingline Note, in each case executed by each Borrower and payable to such Bank. Each Note shall be entitled to all of the benefits of this Agreement and the other Loan Documents and shall be subject to the provisions hereof and thereof.

32    



2.05      Termination or Reduction of the Commitments .
(a)      The Commitments shall automatically and permanently terminate on the Maturity Date. The Swingline Commitment shall be automatically and permanently terminated on the Swingline Maturity Date.
(b)      The Parent may, upon at least two Business Days’ notice to the Administrative Agent, which notice may state that such notice is conditioned upon the effectiveness of alternative financing, in which case such notice may be revoked without penalty prior to the specified time if such condition is not satisfied, terminate in whole or reduce in part the Unused Commitments; provided , however , that each partial reduction (i) shall be in an aggregate amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000 and (ii) shall be applied ratably among the Banks in accordance with their respective Commitments. The amount of any termination or reduction made under this Section 2.05(b) may not thereafter be reinstated.
2.06      Mandatory Payments .
(a)      Except to the extent due or paid sooner pursuant to the provisions hereof, each Borrower shall repay (i) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of all Revolving Loans made to such Borrower on the Maturity Date and (ii) each Swingline Loan made to such Borrower on the earlier of (A) ten Business Days after such Swingline Loan is made and (B) the Swingline Maturity Date.
(b)      In the event that, at any time on or prior to the Maturity Date, the aggregate Credit Exposure shall exceed (i) if any Credit Exposure is denominated in a Foreign Currency, 105% of the aggregate Commitments at such time, or (ii) if all Credit Exposure is denominated solely in Dollars, 100% of the aggregate Commitments at such time (in each case, after giving effect to any concurrent termination or reduction thereof), the Borrowers will immediately prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Swingline Loans and, to the extent of any excess remaining after prepayment in full of outstanding Swingline Loans, the outstanding principal amount of the Revolving Loans in the amount of such excess; provided that, to the extent such excess amount is greater than the aggregate principal amount of Swingline Loans and Revolving Loans outstanding immediately prior to the application of such prepayment, the amount so prepaid shall be retained by the Administrative Agent and held in the Cash Collateral Account as cover for Letter of Credit Exposure, as more particularly described in Section 3.07 , and thereupon such cash shall be deemed to reduce the aggregate Letter of Credit Exposure by an equivalent amount.
2.07      Voluntary Prepayments . At any time and from time to time, each Borrower may prepay its Loans, in whole or in part, together with accrued interest to the date of prepayment, without premium or penalty (except as provided in clause (iii) below), upon written notice given to the Administrative Agent not later than 11:00 a.m. three Business Days prior to each intended prepayment of LIBOR Loans, 11:00 a.m. on the day of each intended payment of Base Rate Loans and 2:00 p.m. on the day of each intended payment of Swingline Loans; provided that (i) each partial prepayment shall be in a principal amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000 ($1,000,000 and $100,000, respectively, in the case of Swingline Loans) or, in the case of Base Rate Loans, any other amount that will cause the aggregate principal

33    



amount of all Base Rate Loans of the applicable Borrower to be $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000, (ii) no partial prepayment of LIBOR Loans made pursuant to any single Borrowing shall reduce the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the remaining LIBOR Loans under such Borrowing to less than $10,000,000, and (iii) any prepayment of LIBOR Loans on a day other than the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto shall be subject to Section 2.17 . Each such notice shall specify the proposed date of such prepayment and the aggregate principal amount and Type of the Loans to be prepaid (and, in the case of LIBOR Loans, the Interest Period of the Borrowing pursuant to which made), shall be irrevocable and shall bind such Borrower to make such prepayment on the terms specified therein. Loans prepaid pursuant to this Section 2.07 may be reborrowed, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event the Administrative Agent receives a notice of prepayment under this Section, the Administrative Agent will give prompt notice thereof to the Banks; provided that if such notice has also been furnished to the Banks, the Administrative Agent shall have no obligation to notify the Banks with respect thereto.
2.08      Interest .
(a)      Subject to Section 2.08(b) , (i) each Revolving Loan shall bear interest on the outstanding principal amount thereof, from the date of Borrowing thereof until such principal amount shall be paid in full, (A) at the Adjusted Base Rate, during such periods as such Revolving Loan is a Base Rate Loan, and (B) at the Adjusted LIBOR Rate, as in effect from time to time during such periods as such Revolving Loan is a LIBOR Loan and (ii) each Swingline Loan shall bear interest on the outstanding principal amount thereof, from the date of Borrowing thereof until such principal amount shall be paid in full, at the Adjusted Base Rate (or such other rate per annum as the Swingline Bank and the applicable Borrower may mutually agree; provided , that at any time any Swingline Loan is required to be participated hereunder, such Swingline Loan shall bear interest from the date such Swingline Loan is participated until paid in full at the Adjusted Base Rate).
(b)      During the existence of any Event of Default under Section 7.01(a) or 7.01(g) , and (at the request of the Required Banks) during the existence of any other Event of Default, all outstanding principal amounts of the Loans, all Reimbursement Obligations (to the extent not already bearing an additional 2% per annum pursuant to Section 3.06 ) and, to the greatest extent permitted by law, all interest accrued on the Loans, all fees that are not paid when due and all unpaid costs, expenses and indemnity obligations shall bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the rate otherwise applicable thereto from time to time plus 2% (or, in the case of interest on interest, costs, expenses and indemnity obligations, at the Adjusted Base Rate plus 2%), and, in each case, such interest shall be payable on demand. To the greatest extent permitted by law, interest shall continue to accrue after the filing by or against any Borrower of any petition seeking any relief in bankruptcy or under any Bankruptcy Law.
(c)      Accrued (and theretofore unpaid) interest shall be payable as follows (other than with respect to any L/C Disbursement under Section 3.06 ):
(i)      in respect of each Base Rate Loan (including any Base Rate Loan or portion thereof paid or prepaid pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.06 or

34    



2.07 , except as provided below), in arrears on the last Business Day of each calendar quarter; provided , that in the event the Loans are repaid or prepaid in full and the Commitments have been terminated, then accrued interest in respect of all Base Rate Loans shall be payable together with such repayment or prepayment on the date thereof;
(ii)      in respect of each LIBOR Loan (including any LIBOR Loan or portion thereof paid or prepaid pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.06 or 2.07 , except as provided below), in arrears (A) on the last Business Day of the Interest Period applicable thereto and (B) in addition, in the case of an Interest Period of six months or longer, on each date that falls every three months after the beginning of such Interest Period; provided , that in the event all LIBOR Loans made pursuant to a single Borrowing are repaid or prepaid in full, then accrued interest in respect of such LIBOR Loans shall be payable together with such repayment or prepayment on the date thereof;
(iii)      in respect of each Swingline Loan, in arrears at the earlier of (A) the maturity of such Swingline Loan, and (B) on the date of payment of such Swingline Loan (including any prepayment of such Swingline Loan or any payment of such Swingline Loan made pursuant to Section 2.02(d) ); and
(iv)      in respect of any Loan, at maturity (whether pursuant to acceleration or otherwise) and, after maturity, on demand.
(d)      Nothing contained in this Agreement or in any other Loan Document shall be deemed to establish or require the payment of interest to any Bank at a rate in excess of the maximum rate permitted by applicable law. If the amount of interest payable for the account of any Bank on any interest payment date would exceed the maximum amount permitted by applicable law to be charged by such Bank, the amount of interest payable for its account on such interest payment date shall be automatically reduced to such maximum permissible amount and the excess interest shall be applied to the principal of the Loans or, if it exceeds such unpaid principal, refunded to the applicable Borrower.
(e)      The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the applicable Borrower and the Banks upon determining the interest rate for each Borrowing of LIBOR Loans after its receipt of the relevant Notice of Borrowing or Notice of Conversion/Continuation, and upon each change in the Base Rate; provided , however , that the failure of the Administrative Agent to provide the applicable Borrower or the Banks with any such notice shall neither affect any obligations of such Borrower or the Banks hereunder nor result in any liability on the part of the Administrative Agent to any Borrower or any Bank. Each such determination shall, absent manifest error, be conclusive and binding on all parties hereto.
(f)      The various rates of interest provided for in this Agreement are minimum interest rates. The parties hereto have assumed that interest at such rates is not and will not become subject to Swiss Withholding Tax. Notwithstanding that the parties hereto do not anticipate that any payment of interest will be subject to Swiss Withholding Tax, each Bank, the Parent and the

35    



Administrative Agent agree that if Swiss Withholding Tax is imposed on any interest payment by the Parent to any Bank and it is unlawful for any reason for the Parent to comply with Section 2.16 when it would otherwise be required to make any payment under such Section, then any payment of interest to be made by the Parent to such Bank shall be increased to an amount which (after making any deduction of the Non-refundable Portion of Swiss Withholding Tax (as defined below)) results in a payment to such Bank of an amount equal to the payment which would have been due had no deduction of Swiss Withholding Tax been required. In calculating the amount due pursuant to the foregoing sentence, Swiss Withholding Tax shall be calculated on the full grossed-up interest amount. For purposes of the foregoing, “ Non-refundable Portion of Swiss Withholding Tax ” means Swiss Withholding Tax at the standard rate (which, as of the date of this Agreement, is 35%) unless according to an applicable double tax treaty, the Non-refundable Portion of Swiss Withholding Tax for any Bank is a specified lower rate, in which case such lower rate shall be applied in relation to such Bank. No payment pursuant to this Section 2.08(f) shall be in duplication of any payment pursuant to Section 2.16 .
(g)      If a Bank shall become aware that it is entitled to claim a refund from a Governmental Authority in respect of increased interest paid pursuant to Section 2.08(f) , such Bank shall promptly notify the Parent of the availability of such refund claim and shall, within 30 days after receipt of a request by the Parent, make a claim to such Governmental Authority for such refund at the Parent’s expense, if obtaining such refund would not, in the good faith judgment of such Bank, be materially disadvantageous to such Bank; provided that nothing in this Section 2.08(g) shall be construed to require any Bank to institute any administrative proceeding (other than the filing of a claim for any such refund) or judicial proceeding to obtain any such refund. If a Bank determines, in its sole discretion, that it has received a refund in respect of any increased interest paid pursuant to Section 2.08(f) , such Bank shall, within 60 days from the date of such receipt, pay over such refund to the Parent (but only to the extent of the increased interest paid by the Parent under Section 2.08(f) giving rise to such refund), net of all out-of-pocket expenses of such Bank in obtaining such refund and without interest (other than interest paid by the relevant Governmental Authority with respect to the relevant portion of such refund); provided that the Parent, upon request of such Bank, agrees to repay the amount paid over to the Parent (plus penalties, interest or other charges) to such Bank in the event such Bank is required to repay such refund to such Governmental Authority. Nothing in this Section 2.08(g) shall be construed to require any Bank to make available its tax returns (or any other information relating to its taxes which it deems confidential) to the Parent or any other Person.
2.09      Fees .
(a)      Commitment Fee . The Parent agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of the Banks a commitment fee, from the Effective Date in the case of each Initial Bank and from the effective date specified in the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it became a Bank in the case of each other Bank until the Maturity Date, payable in arrears quarterly on the last Business Day of each March, June, September and December, commencing December 31, 2012, and on the Maturity Date, at the rate equal to the Applicable Commitment Fee Percentage in effect from time to time on the daily Unused Commitment (excluding clause (iii) of the definition thereof for purposes of this Section 2.09(a) only) during such quarter (or

36    



shorter period); provided , however , that no commitment fee shall accrue on the Commitment of a Defaulting Bank so long as such Bank shall be a Defaulting Bank.
(b)      Agent’s and Arranger’s Fees . The Parent agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent and each Joint Lead Arranger for its own account such fees as may from time to time be agreed between the Parent and the Administrative Agent or such Joint Lead Arranger.
(c)      Letter of Credit Fees, Etc .
(i)      Each Borrower agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Bank a letter of credit fee (the “ Letter of Credit Fee ”), payable in arrears quarterly on the last Business Day of each March, June, September and December, commencing December 31, 2012, and ending on the later of the L/C Maturity Date and the date of termination of the last Letter of Credit outstanding after the Maturity Date, on such Bank’s Pro Rata Share of the average daily aggregate Stated Amount during such quarter (or shorter period) of all Letters of Credit Issued on account of such Borrower outstanding from time to time at the rate equal to the Applicable Letter of Credit Fee Percentage in effect from time to time. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, during the existence of any Event of Default under Section 7.01(a) or 7.01(g) , and at the request of the Required Banks during the existence of any other Event of Default, all Letter of Credit Fees shall accrue at the Applicable Letter of Credit Fee Percentage in effect from time to time plus 2% per annum.
(ii)      Each Borrower agrees to pay (A) to each Fronting Bank (other than a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank) for its own account, a fronting fee in an amount separately agreed by such Borrower (or the Parent on behalf of such Borrower) and such Fronting Bank with respect to each Participated Letter of Credit Issued for the account of such Borrower; (B) to each Non-NAIC Fronting Bank, a fronting fee as mutually agreed upon between such Borrower (or the Parent on behalf of such Borrower) and such Non-NAIC Fronting Bank with respect to each Syndicated Letter of Credit Issued for the account of such Borrower (it being understood that unless otherwise agreed between the applicable Non-NAIC Bank, such Non-NAIC Fronting Bank, the Administrative Agent and the Parent, such fronting fee shall be paid by reducing the applicable Letter of Credit Fee otherwise payable to such Non-NAIC Bank by an amount equal to such fronting fee and paying the same to such Non-NAIC Fronting Bank) and (C) to each of the L/C Agent and each Fronting Bank (other than a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank), each for its own account, its customary Issuance, presentation, amendment and other processing fees, and other standard costs and charges, relating to Letters of Credit as are from time to time in effect.
2.10      Conversions and Continuations .
(a)      Each Borrower may elect (i) to convert all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of any of its Base Rate Loans into LIBOR Loans, or to convert any of its

37    



LIBOR Loans the Interest Periods for which end on the same day into Base Rate Loans, or (ii) upon the expiration of any Interest Period, to continue all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of any of its LIBOR Loans the Interest Periods for which end on the same day for an additional Interest Period, provided that (x) after giving effect to any conversion or continuation, each Borrowing of LIBOR Loans shall be in a principal amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000 and the aggregate principal amount of all Base Rate Loans shall be in a principal amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000, (y) except as otherwise provided in Section 2.15(d) , LIBOR Loans may be converted into Base Rate Loans only on the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto (and, in any event, any conversion of a LIBOR Loan into a Base Rate Loan on any day other than the last day of the Interest Period applicable thereto shall be subject to Section 2.17 ) and (z) no conversion of Base Rate Loans into LIBOR Loans or continuation of LIBOR Loans shall be permitted during the existence of a Default or Event of Default.
(b)      Each Borrower must give the Administrative Agent written notice not later than 11:00 a.m. three (3) Business Days prior to the intended effective date of any conversion of Base Rate Loans into, or continuation of, LIBOR Loans and one (1) Business Day prior to the intended effective date of any conversion of LIBOR Loans into Base Rate Loans. Each such notice (each, a " Notice of Conversion/Continuation ") shall be irrevocable, shall be given in the form of Exhibit B-3 and shall specify (x) the date of such conversion or continuation (which shall be a Business Day), (y) in the case of a conversion into, or a continuation of, LIBOR Loans, the Interest Period to be applicable thereto, and (z) the aggregate amount and Type of the Loans being converted or continued. Upon the receipt of a Notice of Conversion/Continuation, the Administrative Agent will promptly notify each Bank of the proposed conversion or continuation. In the event that any Borrower shall fail to deliver a Notice of Conversion/Continuation as provided herein with respect to any of its outstanding LIBOR Loans, such LIBOR Loans shall automatically be converted to Base Rate Loans upon the expiration of the Interest Period applicable thereto (unless repaid pursuant to the terms hereof). In the event that any Borrower shall have failed to specify an Interest Period to be applicable to any conversion into, or continuation of, its LIBOR Loans, then such Borrower shall be deemed to have selected an Interest Period of one month.
2.11      Payments and Computations; Apportionment of Payments .
(a)      The Borrowers shall make each payment hereunder irrespective of any right of counterclaim, set-off or other defense (except as otherwise provided in Section 2.19 ), not later than 11:00 a.m. on the day when due, in Dollars, to the Administrative Agent (except as otherwise expressly provided herein as to payments required to be made directly to the Issuing Banks or the Banks) at the Administrative Agent’s Account in same day funds, with payments being received by the Administrative Agent after such time being deemed to have been received on the next succeeding Business Day. The Administrative Agent will promptly thereafter cause like funds to be distributed (i) if such payment by such Borrower is in respect of principal, interest, commitment fees or any other amount then payable hereunder to more than one Bank, to such Banks for the account of their respective Applicable Lending Offices ratably in accordance with the amounts of such respective amount then payable to such Banks and (ii) if such payment

38    



by such Borrower is in respect of any amount then payable hereunder to one Bank (including the Swingline Bank), to such Bank for the account of its Applicable Lending Office, in each case to be applied in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon its acceptance of an Assignment and Acceptance and recording of the information contained therein in the Register pursuant to Section   10.07(d) , from and after the effective date of such Assignment and Acceptance, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments hereunder in respect of the interest assigned thereby to the Bank assignee thereunder, and the parties to such Assignment and Acceptance shall make all appropriate adjustments in such payments for periods prior to such effective date directly between themselves.
(b)      All computations of interest and fees hereunder shall be made on the basis of a year consisting of (i) in the case of interest on Base Rate Loans based on the prime commercial lending rate of the Administrative Agent, 365/366 days, as the case may be, or (ii) in all other instances, 360 days; and in each case under (i) and (ii) above, with regard to the actual number of days (including the first day, but excluding the last day) elapsed. Each determination by the Administrative Agent of an interest rate, fee or commission hereunder shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.
(c)      Whenever any payment hereunder shall be stated to be due on a day other than a Business Day, such payment shall be made on the next succeeding Business Day (unless, in the case of a payment with respect to a LIBOR Loan, such next succeeding Business Day falls in another calendar month, in which case such payment shall be made on the next preceding Business Day), and any such extension of time shall in such case be included in the computation of payment of interest or fee, as the case may be.
(d)      Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from the applicable Borrower prior to the date on which any payment is due to the Administrative Agent for the account of the relevant Banks, the Swingline Bank or the relevant Issuing Bank hereunder that such Borrower will not make such payment, the Administrative Agent may assume that such Borrower has made such payment on such date in accordance herewith and may, in reliance upon such assumption, distribute to the relevant Banks, the Swingline Bank or the relevant Issuing Bank, as the case may be, the amount due. In such event, if such Borrower has not in fact made such payment, then each of the relevant Banks, the Swingline Bank or the relevant Issuing Bank, as the case may be, severally agrees to repay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand the amount so distributed to such Bank, such Swingline Bank or such Issuing Bank, with interest thereon, for each day from the date such amount is distributed to it to the date of payment to the Administrative Agent, at the greater of the Federal Funds Rate and a rate determined by the Administrative Agent in accordance with banking industry rules on interbank compensation.
(e)      Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement or any other Loan Document to the contrary, all amounts collected or received by the Administrative Agent or any Bank after acceleration of the Loans pursuant to Section 7.01 shall be applied by the Administrative Agent as follows:
(i)      first , to the payment of all reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ and consultants’ fees

39    



irrespective of whether such fees are allowed as a claim after the occurrence of an Event of Default under Section 7.01(g) ) of the Administrative Agent in connection with enforcing the rights of the Banks under the Loan Documents;
(ii)      second , to the payment of any fees, indemnities, expenses and other amounts owed to the Administrative Agent hereunder or under any other Loan Document;
(iii)      third , to the payment of all reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ and consultants’ fees irrespective of whether such fees are allowed as a claim after the occurrence of an Event of Default under Section 7.01(g) ) of the Issuing Banks, the Swingline Bank, the L/C Agent and each of the Banks in connection with enforcing their rights under the Loan Documents;
(iv)      fourth , to the payment of all of the Obligations consisting of accrued fees, interest, indemnities, expenses and other amounts (including fees incurred and interest accruing at the then applicable rate after the occurrence of an Event of Default under Section 7.01(g) irrespective of whether a claim for such fees incurred and interest accruing is allowed in such proceeding);
(v)      fifth , to the payment of the outstanding principal amount of the Obligations (including the payment of any outstanding Reimbursement Obligations and the obligation to Cash Collateralize Letter of Credit Exposure);
(vi)      sixth , to the payment of all other Obligations and other obligations that shall have become due and payable under the Loan Documents or otherwise and not repaid; and
(vii)      seventh , to the payment of the surplus (if any) to whomever may be lawfully entitled to receive such surplus.
In carrying out the foregoing, (x) amounts received shall be applied in the numerical order provided until exhausted prior to application to the next succeeding category, (y) all amounts shall be apportioned ratably among the Banks in proportion to the amounts of such principal, interest, fees or other Obligations owed to them respectively pursuant to clauses (iii) through (vii) above, and (z) to the extent that any amounts available for distribution pursuant to clause (v) above are attributable to the Issued but undrawn amount of outstanding Letters of Credit, such amounts shall be held by the Administrative Agent to Cash Collateralize Letter of Credit Exposure pursuant to Section 3.07 .
2.12      Recovery of Payments .
(a)      Each Borrower agrees that to the extent it makes a payment or payments to or for the account of the Administrative Agent, any Bank, the Swingline Bank or any Issuing Bank, which payment or payments or any part thereof are subsequently invalidated, declared to be

40    



fraudulent or preferential, set aside or required to be repaid to a trustee, receiver or any other party under any Bankruptcy Law (whether as a result of any demand, settlement, litigation or otherwise), then, to the extent of such payment or repayment, the Obligation intended to be satisfied shall be revived and continued in full force and effect as if such payment had not been received.
(b)      If any amounts distributed by the Administrative Agent to any Bank, the Swingline Bank or any Issuing Bank are subsequently returned or repaid by the Administrative Agent to the applicable Borrower, its representative or successor in interest, or any other Person, whether by court order, by settlement approved by such Bank, the Swingline Bank or such Issuing Bank, or pursuant to applicable law, such Bank, Swingline Bank or such Issuing Bank will, promptly upon receipt of notice thereof from the Administrative Agent, pay the Administrative Agent such amount. If any such amounts are recovered by the Administrative Agent from such Borrower, its representative or successor in interest or such other Person, the Administrative Agent will redistribute such amounts to the Banks, Swingline Bank or the Issuing Banks on the same basis as such amounts were originally distributed.
2.13      Use of Proceeds . The proceeds of the Loans shall be available (and each Borrower agrees that it shall use such proceeds) to provide working capital, and for other general corporate purposes of the Borrowers (including for the Reimbursement Obligations of the Borrowers hereunder) and their respective Subsidiaries, not in contravention of any law or of the Loan Documents.
2.14      Pro Rata Treatment .
(a)      Except in the case of Swingline Loans, all fundings, continuations and conversions of Loans shall be made by the Banks pro rata on the basis of their respective Pro Rata Shares or on the basis of their respective outstanding Revolving Loans (in the case of continuations and conversions of Revolving Loans pursuant to Section 2.10 ), as the case may be from time to time.
(b)      Subject to the provisions of Section 2.20(a)(ii) , all payments from or on behalf of each Borrower on account of any Obligations of such Borrower shall be apportioned ratably among the Banks based upon their respective share, if any, of the Obligations with respect to which such payment was made.
(c)      If any Bank shall, by exercising any right of setoff or counterclaim or otherwise, obtain payment in respect of any principal of or interest on any of its Loans or other Obligations hereunder resulting in such Bank receiving payment of a proportion of the aggregate amount of its Loans and accrued interest thereon or other such Obligations greater than its applicable share thereof as provided herein, then the Bank receiving such greater proportion shall (a) notify the Administrative Agent of such fact and (b) purchase (for cash at face value) participations in the Loans and such other Obligations of the other Banks, or make such other adjustments as shall be equitable, so that the benefit of all such payments shall be shared by the Banks ratably in accordance with their respective applicable shares; provided that (i) if any such participations are purchased and all or any portion of the payment giving rise thereto is recovered, such

41    



participations shall be rescinded and the purchase price restored to the extent of such recovery, without interest, and (ii) the provisions of this Section 2.14(c) shall not be construed to apply to (x) any payment made by any Borrower pursuant to and in accordance with the express terms of this Agreement (including the application of funds arising from the existence of a Defaulting Bank) or (y) any payment obtained by a Bank as consideration for the assignment of or sale of a participation in any of its Loans or participations in Reimbursement Obligations or Swingline Loans to any assignee or participant. Each Borrower consents to the foregoing and agrees, to the extent it may effectively do so under applicable law, that any Bank acquiring a participation pursuant to the foregoing arrangements may exercise against such Borrower rights of setoff and counterclaim with respect to such participation as fully as if such Bank were a direct creditor of such Borrower in the amount of such participation. If under any applicable Bankruptcy Laws, any Bank receives a secured claim in lieu of a setoff to which this Section 2.14(c) applies, such Bank shall, to the extent practicable, exercise its rights in respect of such secured claim in a manner consistent with the rights of the Banks entitled under this Section 2.14(c) to share in the benefits of any recovery on such secured claim.
2.15      Increased Costs, Etc .
(a)      If, due to any Change in Law, there shall be any increase in the cost to any Bank of agreeing to make or of making, funding or maintaining Loans or of agreeing to issue or of issuing or maintaining or participating in Letters of Credit or the making of any payment on any Letter of Credit (excluding, for purposes of this Section 2.15 , any such increased costs resulting from Indemnified Taxes or Excluded Taxes), then the applicable Borrower severally agrees to pay, from time to time, within five days after demand by such Bank (with a copy of such demand to the Administrative Agent), which demand shall include a statement of the basis for such demand and a calculation in reasonable detail of the amount demanded, to the Administrative Agent for the account of such Bank additional amounts sufficient to compensate such Bank for such increased cost. A certificate as to the amount of such increased cost, submitted to the applicable Borrower by such Bank, shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.
(b)      If, due to any Change in Law, there shall be any increase in the amount of capital or liquidity required or expected to be maintained by any Bank or any corporation controlling such Bank as a result of or based upon the existence of such Bank’s commitment to lend hereunder and other commitments of such type, then, within five days after demand by such Bank or such corporation (with a copy of such demand to the Administrative Agent), which demand shall include a statement of the basis for such demand and a calculation in reasonable detail of the amount demanded, the applicable Borrower severally agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of such Bank, from time to time as specified by such Bank, additional amounts sufficient to compensate such Bank in the light of such circumstances, to the extent that such Bank reasonably determines such increase in capital or liquidity to be allocable to the existence of such Bank’s commitment to lend or to Issue or participate in Letters of Credit hereunder or to making, funding or maintaining any Loan or to the issuance or maintenance of or participation in any Letters of Credit. A certificate as to such amounts submitted to the

42    



applicable Borrower by such Bank shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.
(c)      If, prior to the first day of any Interest Period with respect to any LIBOR Loan, the Required Banks notify the Administrative Agent that the LIBOR Rate for such Interest Period for such LIBOR Loans will not adequately reflect the cost to such Banks of making, funding or maintaining their LIBOR Loans for such Interest Period, the Administrative Agent shall forthwith so notify the applicable Borrower and the Banks, whereupon each such LIBOR Loan will (i) in the case of requested new LIBOR Loans, be made as or remain Base Rate Loans or as a LIBOR Loan with a different Interest Period as to which the Required Banks have not given such a notice and (ii) in the case of existing LIBOR Loans, automatically, on the last day of the then existing Interest Period therefor, convert into Base Rate Loans or be continued as a LIBOR Loan with a different Interest Period as to which the Required Banks have not given such notice.
(d)      Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if any Change in Law shall assert that it is unlawful, for any Bank or its Applicable Lending Office to perform its obligations hereunder to make LIBOR Loans or to continue to fund or maintain LIBOR Loans hereunder, then, on notice thereof and demand therefor by such Bank to the Borrowers through the Administrative Agent, (i) each LIBOR Loan of such Bank will automatically, upon such demand, convert into a Base Rate Loan, and (ii) the obligation of such Bank to make LIBOR Loans or to convert Loans into LIBOR Loans shall be suspended until the Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrowers that such Bank has determined that the circumstances causing such suspension no longer exist (it being understood that such Bank shall make and maintain Base Rate Loans in the amount that would otherwise be made and maintained by such Bank as LIBOR Loans absent the circumstances described above).
(e)      Each Bank shall promptly notify the Borrowers and the Administrative Agent of any event of which it has actual knowledge which will result in, and will use reasonable commercial efforts available to it (and not, in such Bank’s good faith judgment, otherwise disadvantageous to such Bank) to mitigate or avoid (i) any obligation by the Borrowers to pay any amount pursuant to Section 2.15(a) or 2.15(b) above or pursuant to Section 2.16 or (ii) the occurrence of any circumstances of the nature described in Section 2.15(c) or 2.15(d) (and, if any Bank has given notice of any such event and thereafter such event ceases to exist, such Bank shall promptly so notify the Borrowers and the Administrative Agent). Without limiting the foregoing, each Bank will designate a different Applicable Lending Office if such designation will avoid (or reduce the cost to the Borrowers of) any event described in the preceding sentence and such designation will not, in such Bank’s good faith judgment, be otherwise disadvantageous to such Bank.
(f)      Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2.15(a) , 2.15(b) or 2.16 (and without limiting Section 2.15(e) above), if any Bank fails to notify the Borrowers of any event or circumstance that will entitle such Bank to compensation pursuant to Section 2.15(a) , 2.15(b) or 2.16 within 120 days after such Bank obtains actual knowledge of such event or circumstance, then such Bank shall not be entitled to compensation from the Borrowers for any amount arising prior to the date which is 120 days before the date on which such Bank notifies the Borrowers of

43    



such event or circumstance (except that, if the Change in Law giving rise to compensation is retroactive, then the 120-day shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof).
(g)      The applicable Borrower shall pay to each Bank, (i) as long as such Bank shall be required to maintain reserves with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency funds or deposits (currently known as "Eurocurrency liabilities"), additional interest on the unpaid principal amount of each LIBOR Loan equal to the actual costs of such reserves allocated to such Loan by such Bank (as determined by such Bank in good faith, which determination shall be conclusive), which shall be due and payable on each date on which interest is payable on such Loan, provided such Borrower shall have received at least 10 days' prior notice (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) of such additional interest or costs from such Bank. If a Bank fails to give notice 10 days prior to the relevant interest payment date, such additional interest or costs shall be due and payable 10 days from receipt of such notice.
2.16      Taxes .
(a)      Any and all payments hereunder shall be made, in accordance with Section 2.11 , free and clear of and without deduction or withholding for Taxes, except as required by applicable law. If any Borrower or the Administrative Agent shall be required by law to deduct or withhold any Taxes from or in respect of any sum payable hereunder to any Bank or any Agent, such Borrower or the Administrative Agent shall timely pay the full amount deducted or withheld to the relevant taxation authority or other authority in accordance with applicable law, and if such Tax is an Indemnified Tax, (i) the sum payable by such Borrower or the Administrative Agent shall be increased as may be necessary so that after such Borrower and the Administrative Agent have made all required deductions or withholding (including deductions or withholding applicable to additional sums payable under this Section 2.16 ) such Bank or such Agent, as the case may be, receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deductions or withholding been made and (ii) such Borrower or the Administrative Agent shall make all such deductions or withholding.
(b)      In addition, each Borrower shall pay to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with applicable law, or timely reimburse the Administrative Agent for the payment of, any Other Taxes.
(c)      Each Borrower shall indemnify each Bank and each Agent for and hold them harmless against the full amount of Indemnified Taxes, and for the full amount of Indemnified Taxes of any kind imposed by any jurisdiction on amounts payable under this Section 2.16 , imposed on or paid by such Bank or such Agent (as the case may be) and any liability arising therefrom or with respect thereto. This indemnification payment shall be made within 30 days from the date such Bank or such Agent (as the case may be) makes written demand therefor.
(d)      Each Bank shall severally indemnify the Administrative Agent, within ten days after demand therefor, for (i) any Taxes attributable to such Bank (but only to the extent that the Borrowers have not already indemnified the Administrative Agent for such Taxes and without limiting the obligation of the Borrowers to do so), (ii) any Taxes attributable to such Bank’s failure to comply with the last sentence of Section 10.07(g) relating to the maintenance of a

44    



record and (iii) any Excluded Taxes attributable to such Bank, in each case, that are payable or paid by the Administrative Agent in connection with any Loan Document, and any reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Excluded Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the relevant Governmental Authority. A certificate as to the amount of such payment or liability delivered to any Bank by the Administrative Agent shall be conclusive absent manifest error. Each Bank hereby authorizes the Administrative Agent to set off and apply any and all amounts at any time owing to such Bank under any Loan Document or otherwise payable by the Administrative Agent to the Bank from any other source against any amount due to the Administrative Agent under this Section 2.16(d) .
(e)      Within 30 days after the date of any payment of Taxes by a Borrower pursuant to this Section 2.16 , such Borrower shall furnish to the Administrative Agent, at its address referred to in Section   10.02 , the original or a certified copy of a receipt evidencing such payment. For purposes of this Section 2.16(e) or Section 2.16(f) , the terms “United States” and “United States person” shall have the meanings specified in Section 7701(a)(9) and 7701(a)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively.
(f)      (1) Each Bank, that is entitled to an exemption from or reduction of withholding Tax with respect to payments made under any Loan Document, on or prior to the date of its execution and delivery of this Agreement in the case of each Initial Bank or each Issuing Bank, as the case may be, and on the date of the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it becomes a Bank in the case of each other Bank, and from time to time thereafter as requested in writing by the Administrative Agent or the Parent (but only so long thereafter as such Bank remains lawfully able to do so), shall deliver to each of the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, such properly completed and executed documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will permit such payments to be made without withholding or at a reduced rate of withholding. In addition, any Bank, if reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, shall deliver such other documentation prescribed by applicable law or reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will enable the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine whether or not such Bank is subject to backup withholding or information reporting requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding two sentences, the completion, execution and submission of such documentation (other than such documentation set forth in Section 2.16(f)(ii) below) shall not be required if in the Bank’s reasonable judgment such completion, execution or submission would subject such Bank to any material unreimbursed cost or expense or would materially prejudice the legal or commercial position of such Bank.
(i)      Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in the event that any Borrower is a resident for tax purposes in the United States,
(A)      Each Bank that is a United States person, on or prior to the date of its execution and delivery of this Agreement in the case of each Initial Bank or each Issuing Bank, as the case may be, and on the date of the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it becomes a Bank in the case of each other Bank, and from time to time thereafter as requested

45    



in writing by the Administrative Agent or the Borrower (but only so long thereafter as such Bank remains lawfully able to do so), shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, two executed originals of Internal Revenue Service (“ IRS ”) Form W-9 certifying that such Bank is exempt from U.S. federal backup withholding tax;
(B)      Each Bank that is not a United States person, on or prior to the date of its execution and delivery of this Agreement in the case of each Initial Bank or each Issuing Bank, as the case may be, and on the date of the Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to which it becomes a Bank in the case of each other Bank, and from time to time thereafter as requested in writing by the Administrative Agent or the Borrower (but only so long thereafter as such Bank remains lawfully able to do so), shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, two executed originals of IRS Forms W-8BEN or W-8ECI or, in the case of a Bank claiming the benefits of the exemption for portfolio interest under Section 881(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, (x) a certificate to the effect that such Bank is not a “bank” within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, a “10 percent shareholder” of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a “controlled foreign corporation” described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code (a “ U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate ”) and (y) two executed originals of IRS Form W-8BEN, or any successor or other form prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service, certifying that such Bank is exempt from or entitled to a reduced rate of United States withholding tax on payments pursuant to this Agreement or, in the case of a Bank providing a form W-8, certifying that such Bank is a foreign corporation, partnership, estate or trust. If any form or document referred to in this Section 2.16(f) requires the disclosure of information, other than information necessary to compute the tax payable and information required on the date hereof by Internal Revenue Service form W-8BEN, W-8ECI or W-8 (and the related certificate described above), that the Bank reasonably considers to be confidential, the Bank shall give notice thereof to the Parent and shall not be obligated to include in such form or document such confidential information
(g)      Each Bank agrees that if any form or certification it previously delivered pursuant to Section 2.16(f) expires or becomes obsolete or inaccurate in any respect, it shall update such form or certification or promptly notify the Borrower and the Administrative Agent in writing of its legal inability to do so.
(h)      Each Bank represents and warrants to the Borrowers and the Administrative Agent that, as of the date such Bank becomes a party to this Agreement, such Bank is entitled to receive payments hereunder from the Borrowers and the Administrative Agent without deduction or withholding for or on account of any Taxes; provided that this representation (i) shall not

46    



apply to any matters relating to FATCA and (ii) assumes that with respect to Swiss Withholding Tax, the Parent is in compliance with the Ten Non-Bank Rule and the Twenty Non-Bank Rule.
(i)      If a payment made to a Bank under any Loan Document would be subject to U.S. federal withholding Tax imposed by FATCA if such Bank were to fail to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of FATCA (including those contained in Section 1471(b) or 1472(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, as applicable), such Bank shall deliver to the Parent and the Administrative Agent at the time or times prescribed by law and at such time or times reasonably requested by the Parent or the Administrative Agent such documentation prescribed by applicable law (including as prescribed by Section 1471(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code) and such additional documentation reasonably requested by the Parent or the Administrative Agent as may be necessary for the Borrowers and the Administrative Agent to comply with their obligations under FATCA and to determine that such Bank has complied with such Bank’s obligations under FATCA or to determine the amount to deduct and withhold from such payment. Solely for purposes of this clause (i), “FATCA” shall include any amendments made to FATCA after the date of this Agreement.
(j)      If any party determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that it has received a refund of any Taxes as to which it has been indemnified pursuant to this Section 2.16 (including by the payment of additional amounts pursuant to this Section 2.16 ), it shall pay to the indemnifying party an amount equal to such refund, net of all out-of-pocket expenses of such indemnified party and without interest (other than any interest paid by the relevant Governmental Authority with respect to such refund); provided that the indemnified party is not required to pay any amount to an indemnifying party pursuant to this paragraph, the payment of which would place the indemnified party in a less favorable net after-Tax position than the indemnified party would have been in if the indemnification payments or additional amounts giving rise to such refund had never been paid. This paragraph shall not be construed to require any indemnified party to make available its Tax returns (or any other information relating to its Taxes that it deems confidential) to the indemnifying party or any other Person.
2.17      Compensation . Each Borrower will compensate each Bank upon demand for all losses, expenses and liabilities (including any loss, expense or liability incurred by reason of the liquidation or redeployment of deposits or other funds required by such Bank to fund or maintain such Borrower's LIBOR Loans, but excluding lost profits) that such Bank may incur or sustain (i) if for any reason (other than a default by such Bank) a Borrowing or continuation of, or conversion into, a LIBOR Loan of such Borrower does not occur on a date specified therefor in a Notice of Borrowing or Notice of Conversion/Continuation, (ii) if any repayment, prepayment or conversion of any LIBOR Loan of such Borrower occurs on a date other than the last day of an Interest Period applicable thereto (including as a consequence of any assignment made pursuant to Section 2.18 or any acceleration of the maturity of the Loans pursuant to Section 7.01 ), (iii) if any prepayment of any LIBOR Loan of such Borrower is not made on any date specified in a notice of prepayment given by such Borrower or (iv) as a consequence of any other failure by such Borrower to make any payments with respect to any LIBOR Loan of such Borrower when due hereunder. Calculation of all amounts payable to a Bank under this Section 2.17 shall be made as though such Bank had actually funded its relevant LIBOR Loan through the purchase of

47    



a Eurodollar deposit bearing interest at the LIBOR Rate in an amount equal to the amount of such LIBOR Loan, having a maturity comparable to the relevant Interest Period; provided , however , that each Bank may fund its LIBOR Loans in any manner it sees fit and the foregoing assumption shall be utilized only for the calculation of amounts payable under this Section 2.17 . A certificate (which shall be in reasonable detail) showing the bases for the determinations set forth in this Section 2.17 by any Bank as to any additional amounts payable pursuant to this Section 2.17 shall be submitted by such Bank to the applicable Borrower either directly or through the Administrative Agent. Determinations set forth in any such certificate made in good faith for purposes of this Section 2.17 of any such losses, expenses or liabilities shall be conclusive absent manifest error.
2.18      Replacement of Affected Bank, Defaulting Bank or Nonconsenting Bank . At any time any Bank is an Affected Bank, a Defaulting Bank or a Nonconsenting Bank, the Borrowers may, at their sole expense (including the assignment fee specified in Section 10.07(a) ) and effort, replace such Affected Bank, Defaulting Bank or Nonconsenting Bank as a party to this Agreement with one or more other Banks and/or Eligible Assignees, and upon notice from the Borrowers such Affected Bank, Defaulting Bank or Nonconsenting Bank shall assign pursuant to an Assignment and Acceptance, and without recourse or warranty, its Commitment, its Loans, the Reimbursement Obligations owing to it, its obligations to fund Letter of Credit payments, its participation in, and its rights and obligations with respect to, Swingline Loans and Letters of Credit, and all of its other rights and obligations hereunder to such other Banks and/or Eligible Assignees for a purchase price equal to the sum of the principal amount of the Loans and Reimbursement Obligations so assigned, all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, such Affected Bank’s, Defaulting Bank’s or Nonconsenting Bank’s Pro Rata Share of all accrued and unpaid fees payable pursuant to Section 2.09 , any amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.17 as a result of such Bank receiving payment of any LIBOR Loan prior to the end of an Interest Period therefor (assuming for such purpose that receipt of payment pursuant to such Assignment and Acceptance constitutes payment of such LIBOR Loan) and all other obligations owed to such Bank hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) no Affected Bank, Defaulting Bank or Nonconsenting Bank shall be required to make any such assignment if, prior to its receipt of the notice from the Borrowers referred to in the foregoing sentence, as a result of a waiver or otherwise, the circumstances entitling the Borrowers to require such assignment cease to apply, and (ii) no Nonconsenting Bank shall be required to make any such assignment if at the time of any such proposed assignment, any Default under this Agreement has occurred and is continuing.
2.19      Increase in Commitments .
(a)      The Parent shall have the right, at any time and from time to time after the Effective Date by written notice to and in consultation with the Administrative Agent, to request an increase in the aggregate Commitments (each such requested increase, a “ Commitment Increase ”), by having one or more existing Banks increase their respective Commitments then in effect (each, an “ Increasing Bank ”), by adding as a Bank with a new Commitment hereunder one or more Persons that are not already Banks (each, an “ Additional Bank ”), or a combination thereof; provided that (i) any such request for a Commitment Increase shall be in a minimum amount of $25,000,000 or, unless the Administrative Agent otherwise consents, a higher integral

48    



multiple of $5,000,000, (ii) immediately after giving effect to any Commitment Increase, the aggregate of all Commitment Increases effected after the Effective Date shall not exceed $500,000,000, and (iii) no existing Bank shall be obligated to increase its Commitment as a result of any request for a Commitment Increase by the Parent unless it agrees in its sole discretion to do so.
(b)      Each Additional Bank must qualify as an Eligible Assignee (the approval of which by the Administrative Agent, each Fronting Bank that has Issued an outstanding Letter of Credit and the Swingline Bank shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) and the Parent and each Additional Bank shall execute a joinder agreement together with all such other documentation as the Administrative Agent may reasonably require, all in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, to evidence the Commitment of such Additional Bank and its status as a Bank hereunder.
(c)      If the aggregate Commitments are increased in accordance with this Section, (i) the Parent shall determine the final amount and allocation of such increase and (ii) the Administrative Agent and the Parent shall determine the effective date (the “ Commitment Increase Date ,” which shall be a Business Day not less than 30 days prior to the Maturity Date) of such increase. The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Parent and the Banks of the final amount and allocation of such increase and the Commitment Increase Date. The Administrative Agent is hereby authorized, on behalf of the Banks, to enter into any amendments to this Agreement and the other Loan Documents as the Administrative Agent shall reasonably deem appropriate to effect such Commitment Increase.
(d)      Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Section 2.19 to the contrary, no increase in the aggregate Commitments pursuant to this Section 2.19 shall be effective unless:
(i)      The Administrative Agent shall have received the following, each dated the Commitment Increase Date and in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent:
(A)      as to each Increasing Bank, evidence of its agreement to provide a portion of the Commitment Increase, and as to each Additional Bank, a duly executed joinder agreement together with all other documentation required by the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 2.19(b) ;
(B)      an instrument, duly executed by each Borrower, acknowledging and reaffirming its obligations under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents;
(C)      unless covered by resolutions previously delivered hereunder, a certificate of the secretary or an assistant secretary or other appropriate officer of each Borrower, certifying to and attaching the resolutions adopted by the board of directors (or similar governing body) of such Borrower approving or consenting to such Commitment Increase;

49    



(D)      a certificate of a Responsible Officer, certifying that (y) as of the Commitment Increase Date, all representations and warranties of the Borrowers contained in this Agreement and the other Loan Documents qualified as to materiality are true and correct and those not so qualified are true and correct in all material respects, both immediately before and after giving effect to the Commitment Increase (except to the extent any such representation or warranty is expressly stated to have been made as of a specific date, in which case such representation or warranty is true and correct (if qualified as to materiality) or true and correct in all material respects (if not so qualified), in each case as of such date), and (z) no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, both immediately before and after giving effect to such Commitment Increase; and
(ii)      If there is a non-ratable increase in the aggregate Commitments, each outstanding Syndicated Letter of Credit shall have been amended giving effect to the reallocation of the Commitments or, if required, returned by each respective beneficiary to the Administrative Agent and cancelled and/or exchanged for a new or amended Syndicated Letter of Credit giving effect to the reallocated Commitments; and
(iii)      In the case of any Credit Extension in connection with such Commitment Increase, the conditions precedent set forth in Section 4.02 shall have been satisfied.
To the extent necessary to keep the outstanding Loans ratable in the event of any non-ratable increase in the aggregate Commitments, on the Commitment Increase Date, (i) all then outstanding LIBOR Loans (the “ Initial Loans ”) shall automatically be converted into Base Rate Loans, (ii) immediately after the effectiveness of the Commitment Increase, the applicable Borrowers shall, if they so request, convert such Base Rate Loans into LIBOR Loans (the “ Subsequent Borrowings ”) in an aggregate principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Initial Loans and of the Types and for the Interest Periods specified in a Notice of Conversion/Continuation delivered to the Administrative Agent in accordance with Section 2.10 , (iii) each Bank shall pay to the Administrative Agent in immediately available funds an amount equal to the difference, if positive, between (y) such Bank’s Pro Rata Share (calculated after giving effect to the Commitment Increase) of the Subsequent Borrowings and (z) such Bank’s Pro Rata Share (calculated without giving effect to the Commitment Increase) of the Initial Loans, (iv) after the Administrative Agent receives the funds specified in clause (iii) above, the Administrative Agent shall pay to each Bank the portion of such funds equal to the difference, if positive, between (y) such Bank’s Pro Rata Share (calculated without giving effect to the Commitment Increase) of the Initial Loans and (z) such Bank’s Pro Rata Share (calculated after giving effect to the Commitment Increase) of the amount of the Subsequent Borrowings, (v) the Banks shall be deemed to hold the Subsequent Borrowings ratably in accordance with their respective Commitment (calculated after giving effect to the Commitment Increase), (vi) each applicable Borrower shall pay all accrued but unpaid interest on the Initial Loans to the Banks

50    



entitled thereto, and (vii)  Schedule I shall automatically be amended to reflect the Commitments of all Banks after giving effect to the Commitment Increase. The conversion of the Initial Loans pursuant to clause (i) above shall be subject to indemnification by the applicable Borrowers pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.17 if the Commitment Increase Date occurs other than on the last day of the Interest Period relating thereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parent and the Administrative Agent may agree upon other methods of implementing a Commitment Increase (including a phase-in of a Commitment Increase with certain Banks having temporary risk participations in outstanding Revolving Loans pending the end of Interest Periods for LIBOR Loans) so long as the applicable method is not materially disadvantageous to any Bank.
2.20      Defaulting Banks .
(a)      Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if any Bank becomes a Defaulting Bank, then, until such time as such Bank is no longer a Defaulting Bank, to the extent permitted by applicable law:
(i)      Such Defaulting Bank’s right to approve or disapprove any amendment, waiver or consent with respect to this Agreement shall be restricted as set forth in the definition of “Required Banks” and in Section 10.01 .
(ii)      Any payment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts received by the Administrative Agent for the account of such Defaulting Bank (whether voluntary or mandatory, at maturity, pursuant to Article VII or otherwise) or received by the Administrative Agent from a Defaulting Bank pursuant to Section 10.05 shall be applied at such time or times as may be determined by the Administrative Agent as follows:
(C)      first , to the payment of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Bank to the Administrative Agent hereunder;
(D)      second , to the payment on a pro rata basis of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Bank to the Fronting Banks or the Swingline Bank hereunder;
(E)      third , if so determined by the Administrative Agent or requested by a Fronting Bank, to Cash Collateralize the Letter of Credit Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Bank in accordance with Section 2.20(c) ;
(F)      fourth , as the applicable Borrower may request (so long as no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing), to the funding of any Loan in respect of which such Defaulting Bank has failed to fund its Pro Rata Share as required by this Agreement, as determined by the Administrative Agent;

51    



(G)      fifth , if so requested by the Parent or the Administrative Agent, to be held in a non-interest bearing deposit account and released in order to (x) satisfy such Defaulting Bank’s present (to the extent not applied pursuant to the foregoing clauses (A) through (D)) or potential future funding obligations with respect to Loans under this Agreement and (y) Cash Collateralize the Fronting Banks’ future Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Bank with respect to future Letters of Credit Issued under this Agreement, in accordance with Section 2.20(c) ;
(H)      sixth , to the payment of any amounts owing to the Banks, the Swingline Bank or any Fronting Bank as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by any Bank, the Swingline Bank or any Fronting Bank against such Defaulting Bank as a result of such Defaulting Bank’s breach of its obligations under this Agreement;
(I)      seventh , to the payment of any amounts owing to any Borrower as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by such Borrower against such Defaulting Bank as a result of such Defaulting Bank’s breach of its obligations under this Agreement; and
(J)      eighth , to such Defaulting Bank or as otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction;
provided that if (x) such payment is a payment of the principal amount of any Loans or any L/C Disbursement in respect of which such Defaulting Bank has not fully funded its Pro Rata Share, and (y) such Loans were made or the related Letters of Credit were Issued at a time when the conditions set forth in Section 4.02 were satisfied or waived, such payment shall be applied solely to pay the Loans of, and obligations in respect of Letters of Credit owed to, all non-Defaulting Banks on a pro rata basis prior to being applied to the payment of any Loans of, or obligations in respect of Letters of Credit owed to, such Defaulting Bank. Any payments, prepayments or other amounts paid or payable to a Defaulting Bank that are applied (or held) to pay amounts owed by such Defaulting Bank or to post Cash Collateral pursuant to this Section 2.20(a)(ii) shall be deemed paid to and redirected by such Defaulting Bank, and each Bank irrevocably consents thereto.
(iii)      No Defaulting Bank shall be entitled to receive any commitment fee under Section 2.09(a) for any period during which that Bank is a Defaulting Bank (and the Borrowers shall not be required to pay any such commitment fee that otherwise would have been required to have been paid to that Defaulting Bank). Each Defaulting Bank shall be entitled to receive Letter of Credit Fees for any period during which that Bank is a Defaulting Bank (and the Borrowers shall be required to pay such Letter of Credit Fees to such Defaulting Bank) only to the extent allocable to its Pro Rata Share of the Stated Amount of Letters of Credit for

52    



which such Defaulting Bank has provided Cash Collateral pursuant to this Section 2.19 . With respect to any Letter of Credit Fee not required to be paid to any Defaulting Bank pursuant to the previous sentence, the Borrowers shall (x) pay to each non-Defaulting Bank that portion of any such fee otherwise payable to such Defaulting Bank with respect to such Defaulting Bank’s participation in Participated Letters of Credit that have been reallocated to such non-Defaulting Bank pursuant to clause (iv) below, (y) pay to each Fronting Bank the amount of any such fee otherwise payable to such Defaulting Bank to the extent allocable to such Fronting Bank’s Fronting Exposure to such Defaulting Bank, and (z) not be required to pay the remaining amount of any such fee.
(iv)      All of such Defaulting Bank’s Swingline Exposure and Letter of Credit Exposure in respect of Participated Letters of Credit shall automatically (effective on the day such Bank becomes a Defaulting Bank) be reallocated among the non-Defaulting Banks in accordance with their respective Pro Rata Shares of the aggregate Commitments (calculated without regard to such Defaulting Bank’s Commitment), but in each case only to the extent that (x) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing (and, unless the Parent shall have otherwise notified the Administrative Agent at the time, each Borrower shall be deemed to have represented and warranted that such condition is satisfied at such time), and (y) such reallocation does not cause the Credit Exposure of any non-Defaulting Bank to exceed such non-Defaulting Bank’s Commitment. No reallocation hereunder shall constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder against a Defaulting Bank arising from that Bank having become a Defaulting Bank, including any claim of a non-Defaulting Bank as a result of such non-Defaulting Bank’s increased exposure following such reallocation.
(v)      If the reallocation described in Section 2.20(a)(iv) cannot, or can only partially, be effected, the Borrowers shall, without prejudice to any right or remedy available to them hereunder or under law, (i) first, prepay Swingline Loans in an amount equal to the Swingline Bank’s Swingline Exposure and (ii) second, within two Business Days following notice by the Administrative Agent, deliver to the Administrative Agent Cash Collateral in an amount sufficient to cover all Letter of Credit Exposure (after giving effect to any partial reallocation pursuant to Section 2.20(a)(iv) ) with respect to such Defaulting Bank in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 2.20(c) . Any Cash Collateral delivered by the Borrowers pursuant to this Section shall be deposited in an interest bearing account with the Administrative Agent and shall bear interest at a rate applicable for such account.
(b)      If the Parent, the Administrative Agent, the Swingline Bank and each Fronting Bank that has Fronting Exposure agree in writing in their sole discretion that a Defaulting Bank should no longer be deemed to be a Defaulting Bank, the Administrative Agent will so notify the parties hereto, whereupon as of the effective date specified in such notice and subject to any

53    



conditions set forth therein (which may include arrangements with respect to any Cash Collateral), such Defaulting Bank will, to the extent applicable, purchase that portion of outstanding Loans of the other Banks or take such other actions as the Administrative Agent may determine to be necessary to cause the Loans, Syndicated Letters of Credit and funded and unfunded participations in Participated Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans to be held on a pro rata basis by the Banks in accordance with their respective Credit Exposures (without giving effect to Section 2.20(a)(iv) ), whereupon such Defaulting Bank will cease to be a Defaulting Bank; provided that no adjustments will be made retroactively with respect to fees accrued or payments made by or on behalf of any Borrower while that Bank was a Defaulting Bank; provided further that except to the extent otherwise expressly agreed by the affected parties, no change hereunder from Defaulting Bank to non-Defaulting Bank will constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder arising from that Bank’s having been a Defaulting Bank.
(c)      (1)    At any time that there shall exist a Defaulting Bank, within one Business Day following the written request of the Administrative Agent or any Fronting Bank (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) the applicable Borrower shall Cash Collateralize all Letter of Credit Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Bank (determined after giving effect to Section 2.20(a)(iv) and any Cash Collateral provided by such Defaulting Bank).
(iv)      The Borrowers, and to the extent provided by any Defaulting Bank, such Defaulting Bank, hereby grant to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the Fronting Banks, and agrees to maintain, a first priority security interest in all Cash Collateral provided by a Borrower pursuant to Section 2.20(c)(i) as security for the Defaulting Banks’ obligation to fund participations in respect of Letters of Credit, to be applied pursuant to clause (iii) below. If at any time the Administrative Agent determines that Cash Collateral is subject to any right or claim of any Person other than the Administrative Agent and the Fronting Banks as herein provided, or that the total amount of such Cash Collateral is less than the Letter of Credit Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Bank at such time, the Borrowers will, promptly upon demand by the Administrative Agent, pay or provide to the Administrative Agent additional Cash Collateral in an amount sufficient to eliminate such deficiency (after giving effect to any Cash Collateral provided by the Defaulting Bank).
(v)      Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Cash Collateral provided under this Section 2.19 shall be held and applied to the satisfaction of the Defaulting Bank’s obligation to fund participations in respect of Letters of Credit (including, as to Cash Collateral provided by a Defaulting Bank, any interest accrued on such obligation) and other obligations for which the Cash Collateral was so provided, prior to any other application of such property as may be provided for herein.
Cash Collateral (or the appropriate portion thereof) provided to reduce Letter of Credit Exposure or other obligations shall be released promptly following (i) the elimination of the applicable

54    



Letter of Credit Exposure or other obligations giving rise thereto (including by the termination of Defaulting Bank status of the applicable Defaulting Bank (or, as appropriate, its assignee)) or (ii) the Administrative Agent’s good faith determination that there exists excess Cash Collateral; provided , however , that (x) Cash Collateral furnished by or on behalf of a Borrower shall not be released during the existence of a Default or Event of Default and (y) the Person providing Cash Collateral and each applicable Fronting Bank may agree that Cash Collateral shall not be released but instead held to support future anticipated Letter of Credit Exposure or other obligations.
ARTICLE III     
LETTERS OF CREDIT
3.01      Syndicated Letters of Credit .
(g)      General . Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, at the request of any Borrower at any time and from time to time during the Availability Period, each Issuing Bank agrees to Issue Letters of Credit as Syndicated Letters of Credit for the account of such Borrower or for the account of any Wholly Owned Subsidiary; provided , that the Parent shall be a joint applicant and account party with respect to any such Syndicated Letter of Credit Issued for the account of a Person that is not a Borrower, and the Parent shall be deemed the “Borrower” hereunder with respect to any such Syndicated Letter of Credit. Each Syndicated Letter of Credit shall be in a form customarily used or otherwise approved by the applicable Borrower and L/C Agent. If at the time that any Borrower requests the Issuance of a Syndicated Letter of Credit by any Bank that is a Non-NAIC Bank, any Non-NAIC Fronting Bank may Issue such Non-NAIC Bank’s Pro Rata Share of such Syndicated Letter of Credit pursuant to terms set forth in Section 3.01(h) . Absent the prior written consent of each Issuing Bank, no Syndicated Letter of Credit may be Issued that would vary the several and not joint nature of the obligations of the Issuing Banks thereunder as provided in the next succeeding sentence. Each Syndicated Letter of Credit shall be Issued by all of the Issuing Banks acting through the L/C Agent, at the time of Issuance as a single multi-bank letter of credit, but the obligation of each Issuing Bank thereunder shall be several and not joint, in the amount of its Pro Rata Share of the Stated Amount of such Syndicated Letter of Credit, provided that the applicable Non-NAIC Fronting Bank shall be severally (and not jointly) liable for its Pro Rata Share of the Stated Amount of such Syndicated Letter of Credit plus the Pro Rata Share of each Non-NAIC Bank that it agrees to front for pursuant to Section 3.01(h) .
(h)      Notice of Issuance . To request the Issuance of a Syndicated Letter of Credit, the applicable Borrower shall hand deliver or telecopy (or transmit by electronic communication, if arrangements for doing so have been approved by the L/C Agent) to the L/C Agent at least three Business Days in advance of the requested date of Issuance (or such shorter period as is acceptable to the L/C Agent, including with respect to any request for the issuance of a Syndicated Letter of Credit on the Effective Date) a notice in a form reasonably acceptable to the L/C Agent (a “ Syndicated Letter of Credit Notice ”) requesting the Issuance of a Syndicated Letter of Credit, or identifying the Syndicated Letter of Credit to be amended, renewed, extended or increased, as the case may be, and specifying the date of Issuance (which shall be a Business

55    



Day), the date on which such Syndicated Letter of Credit is to expire (which shall comply with Section 3.01(c) ), the amount of such Syndicated Letter of Credit, the Applicable Currency of such Syndicated Letter of Credit, the name and address of the beneficiary thereof and the terms and conditions of (and such other information as shall be necessary to prepare, amend, renew, extend or increase, as the case may be) such Syndicated Letter of Credit, it being understood and agreed that Syndicated Letters of Credit may be extended and renewed in accordance with Section 3.01(c) . If requested by the L/C Agent, the applicable Borrower shall submit a letter of credit application on the L/C Agent’s standard form (with such changes as the L/C Agent shall reasonably deem appropriate) in connection with any request for a Syndicated Letter of Credit. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the terms and conditions of any form of letter of credit application submitted by any Borrower to the L/C Agent relating to any Syndicated Letter of Credit, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall control.
(i)      Expiration of Syndicated Letters of Credit . Each Syndicated Letter of Credit shall expire at or prior to the earlier of (i) the close of business on the date one year after the date of the Issuance of such Syndicated Letter of Credit, or (ii) the L/C Maturity Date; provided , however , that at the applicable Borrower’s request a Syndicated Letter of Credit shall provide by its terms, and on terms acceptable to the L/C Agent, for renewal for successive periods of one year or less (but not beyond the L/C Maturity Date) unless and until the L/C Agent shall have delivered prior written notice of nonrenewal to the beneficiary of such Syndicated Letter of Credit no later than the time specified in such Syndicated Letter of Credit (which the L/C Agent shall do only if one or more of the applicable conditions under Section 4.02 (other than the delivery of a Letter of Credit Notice) is not then satisfied). The L/C Agent shall promptly provide a copy of any such notice to the applicable Borrower.
(j)      Obligation of Banks . The obligation of any Issuing Bank under any Syndicated Letter of Credit shall be several and not joint and shall be in an amount equal to such Issuing Bank’s Pro Rata Share of the aggregate Stated Amount of such Syndicated Letter of Credit at the time such Syndicated Letter of Credit is Issued, and each Syndicated Letter of Credit shall expressly so provide; provided that the applicable Non-NAIC Fronting Bank shall be severally (and not jointly liable) for its Pro Rata Share of the Stated Amount of such Syndicated Letter of Credit plus the Pro Rata Share of each Non-NAIC Bank for which it is fronting pursuant to Section 3.01(h) . No increase of Commitments under Section 2.19 or assignment of Commitments under Section 2.18 or Section 10.07 shall change or affect the liability of any Issuing Bank under any outstanding Syndicated Letter of Credit until such Syndicated Letter of Credit is amended giving effect to such increase, assignment or reallocation, as the case may be. The failure of any Issuing Bank to make any L/C Disbursement in respect of any Syndicated Letter of Credit on any date shall not relieve any other Issuing Bank of its corresponding obligation, if any, hereunder to do so on such date, but no Issuing Bank shall be responsible for the failure of any other Issuing Bank to make its L/C Disbursement in respect of any Syndicated Letter of Credit.
(k)      Issuance Administration . Each Syndicated Letter of Credit shall be executed and delivered by the L/C Agent in the name and on behalf of, and as attorney-in-fact for, each Issuing

56    



Bank party to such Syndicated Letter of Credit, and the L/C Agent shall act under each Syndicated Letter of Credit, and each Syndicated Letter of Credit shall expressly provide that the L/C Agent shall act, as the agent of each such Issuing Bank to (i) execute and deliver such Syndicated Letter of Credit, (ii) receive drafts, other demands for payment and other documents presented by the beneficiary under such Syndicated Letter of Credit, (iii) determine whether such drafts, demands and documents are in compliance with the terms and conditions of such Syndicated Letter of Credit, (iv) notify such Issuing Bank and the applicable Borrower that a valid drawing has been made and the date that the related L/C Disbursement is to be made and (v) exercise all rights held by the issuer of a letter of credit under the documents for which such Syndicated Letter of Credit shall provide credit enhancement (or designate any Person as its representative for all such purposes under such documents); provided that the L/C Agent shall have no obligation or liability for any L/C Disbursement under such Syndicated Letter of Credit, and each Syndicated Letter of Credit shall expressly so provide. Each Issuing Bank hereby irrevocably appoints and designates the L/C Agent as its attorney-in-fact, acting through any duly authorized officer, to execute and deliver in the name and on behalf of such Issuing Bank each Syndicated Letter of Credit to be Issued by such Issuing Bank hereunder and to take such other actions contemplated by this Section 3.01(e) . Promptly upon the request of the L/C Agent, each Issuing Bank will furnish to the L/C Agent such additional powers of attorney or other evidence as any beneficiary of any Syndicated Letter of Credit may reasonably request in order to demonstrate that the L/C Agent has the power to act as attorney-in-fact for such Issuing Bank to execute and deliver such Syndicated Letter of Credit.
(l)      Disbursement Procedures . The L/C Agent shall, within a reasonable time following its receipt thereof (and, in any event, within any specific time specified in the text of the relevant Syndicated Letter of Credit), examine all documents purporting to represent a demand for payment under any Syndicated Letter of Credit. The L/C Agent shall promptly after such examination and before such L/C Disbursement notify each applicable Issuing Bank and the applicable Borrower by telephone (confirmed by telecopy or email) of such demand for payment. With respect to any demand for payment made under a Syndicated Letter of Credit which the L/C Agent has informed the applicable Issuing Banks is valid, each such Issuing Bank will promptly make an L/C Disbursement in respect of such Syndicated Letter of Credit and in the Applicable Currency, such L/C Disbursement to be made to the account of the L/C Agent most recently designated by it for such purpose by notice to the Issuing Banks. The L/C Agent will make such L/C Disbursement available to the beneficiary of such Syndicated Letter of Credit by promptly crediting the amounts so received, in the funds so received, to the account identified by such beneficiary in connection with such demand for such L/C Disbursement. Promptly following any L/C Disbursement by any Issuing Bank in respect of any Syndicated Letter of Credit, the L/C Agent will notify the applicable Borrower of such L/C Disbursement.
(m)      Reimbursement . Each Borrower agrees that it shall reimburse the applicable Issuing Banks in respect of L/C Disbursements made under such Borrower’s Syndicated Letter of Credit by paying to the Administrative Agent an amount in Dollars equal to the aggregate of the Dollar Amount (calculated as of the L/C Disbursement Date) of each L/C Disbursement no later than 2:00 p.m. on the Business Day following the L/C Disbursement Date (the “ Syndicated L/C Honor Date ”) with respect to such Syndicated Letter of Credit together with interest thereon

57    



payable as provided in Section 3.06 . If the applicable Borrower fails to so reimburse the Issuing Banks by such time of the amount of the unreimbursed drawing (the “ Unreimbursed Amount ”), so long as the conditions set forth in Section 4.02 (other than the delivery of a Notice of Borrowing) are satisfied and subject to the amount of the Unused Commitments, such Borrower shall be deemed to have requested a Borrowing of Base Rate Loans to be disbursed on the Syndicated L/C Honor Date in an amount equal to the Unreimbursed Amount, without regard to the minimum and multiples specified in Section 2.02(a)(i) for the principal amount of Borrowings, and the L/C Disbursements of each of the Issuing Banks shall be deemed to have satisfied their obligation to fund their Pro Rata Share of such Borrowing. Without limiting any other obligations of each Borrower hereunder, each Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify each applicable Issuing Bank in respect of each Syndicated Letter of Credit denominated in a Foreign Currency for any and all costs, expenses and losses incurred by such Issuing Bank as a result of receiving payment or reimbursement for any L/C Disbursement thereunder from any Person in a Currency other than Dollars. Any such amount payable to any Issuing Bank shall be payable within ten Business Days after demand and submission by such Issuing Bank of satisfactory evidence reflecting the calculation of such amount, which shall be conclusive absent manifest error.
(n)      Non-NAIC Banks . In the event any Bank advises the L/C Agent that such Bank is a Non-NAIC Bank, (i) such Non-NAIC Bank shall cease to Issue Syndicated Letters of Credit so long as it is a Non-NAIC Bank and shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a Bank to act as a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank and to Issue such Non-NAIC Bank’s Pro Rata Share of any Syndicated Letter of Credit, (ii) to the extent Syndicated Letters of Credit are outstanding, the L/C Agent will use commercially reasonable efforts to amend any Syndicated Letter of Credit such that such Non-NAIC Bank is removed from such Syndicated Letter of Credit and the applicable Non-NAIC Fronting Bank, if any, is added to such Syndicated Letter of Credit to honor any draft drawn thereon in an amount equal to the Non-NAIC Bank’s Pro Rata Share with respect to such Syndicated Letter of Credit, and (iii) immediately upon the issuance or amendment of any Syndicated Letter of Credit, each Non-NAIC Bank shall be deemed to, and hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees to, without recourse or warranty, purchase from the applicable Non-NAIC Fronting Bank, if any, a risk participation in each such Syndicated Letter of Credit in accordance with Section 3.02(d) in an amount equal to such Non-NAIC Bank’s Pro Rata Share of the Stated Amount of such Syndicated Letter of Credit.
3.02      Participated Letters of Credit .
(i)      General . Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, any Borrower may request any Fronting Bank (other than a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank) to Issue, at any time and from time to time during the Availability Period, and such Fronting Bank hereby agrees to Issue, Participated Letters of Credit for the account of such Borrower or for the account of any Wholly Owned Subsidiary; provided , that the Parent shall be a joint applicant and account party with respect to any such Participated Letter of Credit Issued for the account of a Person that is not a Borrower, and the Parent shall be deemed the “Borrower” hereunder with respect to any such Participated Letter of Credit. Each Participated Letter of Credit shall be in a form customarily used or otherwise approved by the applicable Borrower and the applicable Fronting Bank.

58    



(j)      Notice of Issuance . To request the Issuance of a Participated Letter of Credit, the applicable Borrower shall hand deliver or telecopy (or transmit by electronic communication, if arrangements for doing so have been approved by the applicable Fronting Bank and Administrative Agent) to the applicable Fronting Bank and the Administrative Agent (which will promptly notify the Banks) at least three Business Days in advance of the requested date of Issuance (or such shorter period as is acceptable to the applicable Fronting Bank, including with respect to any request for the Issuance of a Participated Letter of Credit on the Effective Date, subject to approval by the applicable Fronting Bank) a notice in a form reasonably acceptable to the applicable Fronting Bank (a “ Participated Letter of Credit Notice ”) requesting the Issuance of a Participated Letter of Credit, or identifying the Participated Letter of Credit to be amended, renewed, extended or increased, as the case may be, and specifying the date of Issuance (which shall be a Business Day), the date on which such Participated Letter of Credit is to expire (which shall comply with Section 3.02(c) ), the amount of such Participated Letter of Credit, the Applicable Currency of such Participated Letter of Credit, the name and address of the beneficiary thereof and the terms and conditions of (and such other information as shall be necessary to prepare, amend, renew, extend or increase, as the case may be) such Participated Letter of Credit, it being understood and agreed that Participated Letters of Credit may be extended and renewed in accordance with Section 3.02(c) . If requested by any applicable Fronting Bank, the applicable Borrower shall submit a letter of credit application on such Fronting Bank’s standard form (with such changes as such Fronting Bank shall reasonably deem appropriate) in connection with any request for a Participated Letter of Credit. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the terms and conditions of any form of letter of credit application submitted by any Borrower to such Fronting Bank relating to any Participated Letter of Credit, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall control.
(k)      Expiration of Participated Letters of Credit . Each Participated Letter of Credit shall expire at or prior to the earlier of (i) the close of business on the date one year after the date of the Issuance of such Participated Letter of Credit, or (ii) the L/C Maturity Date; provided , however , that at the applicable Borrower’s request a Participated Letter of Credit shall provide by its terms, and on terms acceptable to the applicable Fronting Bank, for renewal for successive periods of one year or less (but not beyond the L/C Maturity Date) unless and until the applicable Fronting Bank shall have delivered prior written notice of nonrenewal to the beneficiary of such Participated Letter of Credit no later than the time specified in such Participated Letter of Credit (which the applicable Fronting Bank shall do only if one or more of the applicable conditions under Section 4.02 (other than the delivery of a Letter of Credit Notice) is not then satisfied). The applicable Fronting Bank shall promptly provide a copy of any such notice to the applicable Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
(l)      Participations . By the Issuance of a Participated Letter of Credit (or the fronting for a Non-NAIC Bank in respect of a Syndicated Letter of Credit pursuant to Section 3.01(h) ) by the applicable Fronting Bank and without any further action on the part of the applicable Fronting Bank or the Banks, the applicable Fronting Bank hereby grants to each applicable Bank in respect of such Participated Letter of Credit (or to the Non-NAIC Bank in respect of such Syndicated Letter of Credit), and each such Bank (or such Non-NAIC Bank) hereby acquires

59    



from the applicable Fronting Bank, a participation in such Participated Letter of Credit (or such Syndicated Letter of Credit) in an amount equal to the Dollar Amount of such Bank’s Pro Rata Share of the Stated Amount of such Participated Letter of Credit (or such Syndicated Letter of Credit) and the applicable Borrower’s reimbursement obligations with respect thereto. Each Bank (or Non-NAIC Bank) acknowledges and agrees that its obligation to acquire participations pursuant to this paragraph in respect of Participated Letters of Credit (or, with respect to any Non-NAIC Bank, Syndicated Letters of Credit) is absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstance whatsoever, including any amendment, renewal or extension of any such Letter of Credit or the existence of a Default or Event of Default or reduction or termination of the aggregate Commitments. In consideration and in furtherance of the foregoing, each Bank (or Non-NAIC Bank) hereby absolutely and unconditionally agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent, for the account of the applicable Fronting Bank, the Dollar Amount of such Bank’s Pro Rata Share of each L/C Disbursement made by the applicable Fronting Bank in respect of any Participated Letter of Credit (or, with respect to any Non-NAIC Bank, Syndicated Letter of Credit) promptly upon the request of the applicable Fronting Bank at any time from the time such L/C Disbursement is made until such L/C Disbursement is reimbursed by the applicable Borrower or at any time after any reimbursement payment is required to be disgorged or refunded to any Borrower for any reason. Such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement, withholding or reduction whatsoever. Promptly following receipt by the Administrative Agent of any payment from any Borrower pursuant to Section 3.02(f) , the Administrative Agent shall distribute such payment to the applicable Fronting Bank or, to the extent that any Bank or Non-NAIC Bank have made payments pursuant to this paragraph to reimburse the applicable Fronting Bank, then to such Banks or Non-NAIC Bank and the applicable Fronting Bank as their interests may appear. Any payment made by a Bank or Non-NAIC Bank pursuant to this paragraph to reimburse any Fronting Bank for any L/C Disbursement made by it shall not relieve the applicable Borrower of its obligation to reimburse such L/C Disbursement. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, effective upon the increase of the Commitments pursuant to Section 2.19 , each Bank’s participation in any Participated Letter of Credit (and each Non-NAIC Bank’s participation in any Syndicated Letter of Credit) outstanding on such date shall be adjusted to reflect its Pro Rata Share after giving effect to such increase.
(m)      Disbursement Procedures; Funding of Participations .
(viii)      The applicable Fronting Bank shall, within a reasonable time following its receipt thereof (and, in any event, within any time specified in the text of the relevant Participated Letters of Credit Issued by it), examine all documents purporting to represent a demand for payment under a Participated Letter of Credit. The applicable Fronting Bank shall promptly after such examination notify the Administrative Agent and the applicable Borrower by telephone (confirmed by telecopy or email) of such demand for payment and whether such Fronting Bank has made or will make a L/C Disbursement thereunder. If such Borrower shall fail to reimburse the applicable Fronting Bank for such L/C Disbursement on the date and time specified in Section 3.02(f) , the Administrative Agent shall notify each applicable Bank of the applicable L/C

60    



Disbursement, the payment then due from such Borrower in respect thereof and the Dollar Amount of such Bank’s Pro Rata Share thereof. Each applicable Bank (including any applicable Non-NAIC Bank) shall upon such notice make funds available to the Administrative Agent in Dollars for the account of the applicable Fronting Bank at the Administrative Agent’s Account in an amount equal to (i) in the case of a Participated Letter of Credit, the Dollar Amount of its Pro Rata Share of the unpaid L/C Disbursement and (ii) in the case of a Non-NAIC Bank with respect to Syndicated Letters of Credit, the Dollar Amount of its Pro Rata Share of such Syndicated Letters of Credit being fronted by such Fronting Bank pursuant to Section 3.01(h) (such amount, its “ L/C Advance ”) not later than 2:00 p.m. on the Business Day specified in such notice by the Administrative Agent. No such making of an L/C Advance shall relieve or otherwise impair the obligation of the applicable Borrower to reimburse the applicable Fronting Bank for the amount of any payment made by such Fronting Bank under such Participated Letter of Credit (or such Syndicated Letter of Credit in the case of a Non-NAIC Bank), together with interest as provided herein.
(ix)      If any Bank fails to make available to the Administrative Agent for the account of the applicable Fronting Bank any amount required to be paid by such Bank pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Section 3.02(e) by the time specified in Section 3.02(e)(i) , the applicable Fronting Bank shall be entitled to recover from such Bank (acting through the Administrative Agent), on demand, such amount with interest thereon for the period from the date such payment is required to the date on which such payment is immediately available to the applicable Fronting Bank at a rate per annum equal to the Federal Funds Rate from time to time in effect. A certificate of the applicable Fronting Bank submitted to any Bank (through the Administrative Agent) with respect to any amounts owing under this clause (ii) shall be conclusive absent manifest error. Until a Bank funds its L/C Advance pursuant to this Section 3.02(e) to reimburse the applicable Fronting Bank for any L/C Disbursement made by it, interest in respect of such Bank’s L/C Advance shall be solely for the account of the applicable Fronting Bank.
(n)      Reimbursement . Each Borrower agrees that it shall reimburse the applicable Fronting Bank in respect of any L/C Disbursement made under such Borrower’s Participated Letter of Credit by paying to the Administrative Agent an amount in Dollars equal to the Dollar Amount (calculated as of the L/C Disbursement Date) of such L/C Disbursement no later than 2:00 p.m. on the Business Day following the L/C Disbursement Date (the “ Participated L/C Honor Date ”) with respect to such Participated Letter of Credit together with interest thereon payable as provided in Section 3.06 . If the applicable Borrower fails to so reimburse the Banks by such time, the Administrative Agent shall promptly notify each Bank of the amount of the Unreimbursed Amount, and the amount of such Bank’s Pro Rata Share thereof. In such event, the Borrower shall be deemed to have requested a Borrowing of Base Rate Loans to be disbursed on the Participated L/C Honor Date in an amount equal to the Unreimbursed Amount, without regard to the minimum and multiples specified in Section 2.02(a)(i) for the principal amount of

61    



Borrowings, but subject to the amount of the Unused Commitments, and subject to the conditions set forth in Section 4.02 (other than the delivery of a Notice of Borrowing), and each Bank shall fund its Pro Rata Share of such Borrowing as set forth in Section 2.02(b) . If the Borrower is unable to request a Borrowing of Base Rate Loans because it cannot satisfy each of the conditions set forth in Section 4.02 (other than the delivery of a Notice of Borrowing) or for any other reason, each Bank shall fund its L/C Advances as set forth in Section 3.02(e) . Without limiting any other obligations of each Borrower hereunder, each Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify the applicable Fronting Bank in respect of any Participated Letters of Credit denominated in a Foreign Currency for any and all costs, expenses and losses incurred by it as a result of receiving payment or reimbursement for any L/C Disbursement thereunder from any Person in a Currency other than Dollars. Any such amount payable to any Fronting Bank shall be payable within ten Business Days after demand and submission by such Fronting Bank of satisfactory evidence reflecting the calculation of such amount, which shall be conclusive absent manifest error.
(o)      Repayment of Participations .
(i)      At any time after the applicable Fronting Bank has made a payment under any Participated Letter of Credit (or Syndicated Letter of Credit in the case of a Non-NAIC Bank) and has received from any Bank such Bank’s L/C Advance in respect of such payment in accordance with Section 3.02(e) , if the Administrative Agent receives for the account of the applicable Fronting Bank any payment in respect of the related unpaid L/C Disbursement or interest thereon (whether directly from the applicable Borrower or otherwise, including proceeds of Cash Collateral applied thereto by the Administrative Agent), the Administrative Agent will distribute to such Bank its Pro Rata Share thereof (appropriately adjusted, in the case of interest payments, to reflect the period of time during which such Bank’s L/C Advance was outstanding) in the same funds as those received by the Administrative Agent.
(ii)      If any payment received by the Administrative Agent for the account of the applicable Fronting Bank pursuant to Section 3.02(e)(i) is required to be returned under any of the circumstances described in Section 2.12 (including pursuant to any settlement entered into by the applicable Fronting Bank in its discretion), each Bank shall pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of the applicable Fronting Bank its Pro Rata Share thereof on demand of the Administrative Agent, plus interest thereon from the date of such demand to the date such amount is returned by such Bank, at a rate per annum equal to the Federal Funds Rate from time to time in effect.
(p)      Failure to Make L/C Advances . The failure of any Bank to make the L/C Advance to be made by it on the date specified in Section 3.02(e) shall not relieve any other Bank of its obligation hereunder to make its L/C Advance on such date, but no Bank shall be responsible for the failure of any other Bank to make the L/C Advance to be made by such other Bank on such date.

62    



3.03      Existing Letters of Credit . The Borrowers, the Administrative Agent, the Fronting Banks and the Banks agree that, as of the Effective Date, each Existing Letter of Credit described on Schedule II Issued for the account of a Borrower and which remains outstanding as of the Effective Date shall be deemed Issued as of the Effective Date under this Agreement as a Participated Letter of Credit for the account of such Borrower by the applicable Fronting Bank identified on Schedule II for each such Participated Letter of Credit, in its capacity as a Fronting Bank.
3.04      Conditions Precedent to the Issuance of Letters of Credit . Each Issuing Bank shall not be under any obligation to, and in the case of clauses (i), (ii), (iv), (v) and (vi) below shall not, Issue any Letter of Credit if:
(i)      any order, judgment or decree of any Governmental Authority or arbitrator shall purport by its terms to enjoin or restrain the Issuance of such Letter of Credit or any law applicable to such Issuing Bank or any Bank or any request or directive (whether or not having the force of law) from any Governmental Authority with jurisdiction over it shall prohibit, or request that it refrain from, the issuance of letters of credit generally or such Letter of Credit in particular or shall impose upon it with respect to such Letter of Credit any restriction or reserve or capital requirement (for which such Issuing Bank or any Bank is not otherwise compensated) not in effect on the Effective Date, or any unreimbursed loss, cost or expense which was not applicable, in effect or known to it as of the Effective Date;
(ii)      the limitation on amounts set forth under Section 2.01 will be exceeded, immediately after giving effect thereto;
(iii)      the L/C Agent or the applicable Fronting Bank, as the case may be, shall have delivered the written notice of nonrenewal described in Section 3.01(c) and Section 3.02(c) with respect to such Letter of Credit;
(iv)      the Administrative Agent has received written notice from the applicable Fronting Bank or the Required Banks, as the case may be, or any Borrower, on or prior to the Business Day prior to the requested date of the issuance of such Letter of Credit, that one or more of the applicable conditions under Section 4.02 is not then satisfied;
(v)      the expiry date of such Letter of Credit would occur more than twelve months after the date of issuance or last extension unless the Required Banks have approved such expiry date;
(vi)      the expiry date of such Letter of Credit is after the L/C Maturity Date, unless all of the Banks have approved such expiry date in writing;

63    



(vii)      such Letter of Credit is not in a form reasonably acceptable to, the applicable Borrowers, the Administrative Agent and the L/C Agent or applicable Fronting Bank, as the case may be;
(viii)      such Letter of Credit is denominated in a currency other than Dollars or a Foreign Currency;
(ix)      with respect to the issuance of a Participated Letter of Credit or the fronting for a Non-NAIC Bank in respect of a Syndicated Letter of Credit pursuant to Section 3.01(h) , any Bank is at that time a Defaulting Bank, unless the applicable Fronting Bank (x) has entered into arrangements, including the delivery of Cash Collateral, satisfactory to such Fronting Bank (in its sole discretion) with such Bank and/or the applicable Borrower, or (y) has received Cash Collateral from (or entered into other arrangements satisfactory to such Fronting Bank in its sole discretion with) the Borrowers to eliminate such Fronting Bank’s actual or potential Fronting Exposure (after giving effect to Section 2.20(a)(iv) ) with respect to such Defaulting Bank as it may elect in its sole discretion; or
(x)      in the case of a Syndicated Letter of Credit, any Bank has advised the L/C Agent that it is a Non-NAIC Bank, unless such Bank has entered into an agreement with a Fronting Bank to front for such Bank under such Syndicated Letter of Credit.
3.05      Obligations Absolute . The Reimbursement Obligations of each Borrower with respect to an L/C Disbursement under any Letter of Credit Issued for its account and of any Bank (or any Non-NAIC Bank) to reimburse the applicable Fronting Bank with respect to any L/C Disbursement made by such Fronting Bank under any Participated Letter of Credit (or Syndicated Letter of Credit) shall be unconditional and irrevocable, and shall be paid strictly in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and any Letter of Credit Document under all circumstances, including the following circumstances:
(i)      any lack of validity or enforceability of this Agreement, any other Loan Document, any Letter of Credit Document or any other agreement or instrument relating thereto;
(ii)      any change in the time, manner or place of payment of, or in any other term of, all or any of the Obligations of any Borrower in respect of any Letter of Credit Document or any other amendment or waiver of or any consent to departure from all or any of the Letter of Credit Documents;
(iii)      the existence of any claim, set-off, defense or other right that any Borrower may have at any time against any beneficiary or any transferee of a Letter of Credit (or any Persons for which any such beneficiary or any such transferee may be acting), any Issuing Bank, the Administrative Agent, the L/C Agent, any Bank or any other Person, whether in connection with this Agreement,

64    



the transactions contemplated hereby or by such Letter of Credit or any other Letter of Credit Document or any unrelated transaction;
(iv)      any statement or any other document presented under a Letter of Credit proving to be forged, fraudulent, invalid or insufficient in any respect or any statement therein being untrue or inaccurate in any respect;
(v)      payment by any Issuing Bank under a Letter of Credit against presentation of a draft or certificate that does not strictly comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit; provided , however , that such draft or certificate substantially complies with the terms of such Letter of Credit;
(vi)      any payment made by any Issuing Bank under such Letter of Credit to any Person purporting to be a trustee in bankruptcy, debtor−in−possession, assignee for the benefit of creditors, liquidator, receiver or other representative of or successor to any beneficiary or any transferee of such Letter of Credit, including any arising in connection with any proceeding under any Bankruptcy Law;
(vii)      any adverse change in the relevant exchange rates or in the availability of the relevant Currency in the relevant currency markets generally;
(viii)      any exchange, release or non-perfection of any collateral, or any release or amendment or waiver of or consent to departure from any guarantee, for all or any of the Obligations of any Borrower; or
(ix)      any other circumstance or happening whatsoever, whether or not similar to any of the foregoing, including any other circumstance that might otherwise constitute a defense available to, or a discharge of, any Borrower or any guarantor, other than as may be expressly set forth in this Agreement.
None of the Administrative Agent, the L/C Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Bank or any of their Related Parties shall have any liability or responsibility to any Borrower by reason of or in connection with the issuance or transfer of any Letter of Credit or any payment or failure to make any payment thereunder, or any error, omission, interruption, loss or delay in transmission or delivery of any draft, notice or other communication under or relating to any Letter of Credit (including any document required to make a drawing thereunder), any error in interpretation of technical terms or any consequence arising from causes beyond their control; provided that the foregoing shall not be construed to excuse the Administrative Agent, the L/C Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Bank from liability to any Borrower to the extent of any direct damages (as opposed to consequential or exemplary damages, claims in respect of which are hereby waived by each Borrower to the extent permitted by applicable law) suffered by any Borrower that are caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Administrative Agent, the L/C Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Bank, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction by final and nonappealable judgment, when determining whether drafts and other documents presented under a Letter of Credit comply with the terms thereof.

65    



3.06      Interest . Each L/C Disbursement made in respect of a Letter of Credit shall bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Adjusted Base Rate until the date that is one Business Day following the L/C Disbursement Date, provided that if such L/C Disbursement is not reimbursed in full by 2:00 p.m. on the date that is one Business Day following the L/C Disbursement Date, the unpaid amount of the Reimbursement Obligation thereof shall bear interest from such date until such amount is paid in full at a rate per annum equal to the Adjusted Base Rate plus an additional 2% per annum, payable on demand. The Administrative Agent shall give prompt notice to the applicable Borrower and the applicable Banks of the applicable interest rate determined by the Administrative Agent for purposes of this Section.
3.07      Collateralization of Letters of Credit .
(h)      (i) Upon (A) the Administrative Agent’s request given in accordance with Section 7.02 during the existence of an Event of Default, and (B) the L/C Maturity Date, each Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent Cash Collateral in an amount equal to the aggregate Stated Amount of all Letters of Credit Issued for the account of such Borrower outstanding at such time (whether or not any beneficiary under any Letter of Credit shall have drawn or be entitled at such time to draw thereunder) and (ii) in the event of a payment under Section 2.06(b) , the Administrative Agent will retain such amount as may then be required to be retained, and the Administrative Agent shall deposit such amounts in each case under clauses (i) and (ii) in a special collateral account of such Borrower pursuant to arrangements satisfactory to the Administrative Agent (such account, the “ Cash Collateral Account ”) for the benefit of the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks, and the Banks.
(i)      Each Borrower hereby grants to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the Issuing Banks and the Banks, a Lien upon and security interest in its Cash Collateral Account and all amounts held therein from time to time as security for the Letter of Credit Exposure relating to such Borrower, and for application to its aggregate Reimbursement Obligations as and when the same shall arise. The Administrative Agent shall have exclusive dominion and control, including the exclusive right of withdrawal, over such account for the benefit of the Issuing Banks and the Banks and such Borrower shall have no interest therein except as set forth in Section 3.07(c) . Amounts held in the Cash Collateral Account pursuant to this Section 3.07 shall not bear interest during the existence of an Event of Default.
(j)      In the event of a drawing, and subsequent payment by any Issuing Bank, under any Letter of Credit at any time during which any amounts are held in the applicable Cash Collateral Account, the Administrative Agent will deliver to such Issuing Bank a Dollar Amount equal to the Reimbursement Obligation created as a result of such payment (or, if the amounts so held are less than such Reimbursement Obligation, all of such amounts) to reimburse such Issuing Bank therefor. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the extent any such drawing is made, the applicable Borrower’s Reimbursement Obligation shall be deemed to have been satisfied and discharged to the extent of any such payment from the Cash Collateral Account. Any amounts remaining in any Cash Collateral Account (including interest and profits) after the expiration of the Letters of Credit and reimbursement in full of the Issuing Banks for all of their respective obligations thereunder shall be held by the Administrative Agent,

66    



for the benefit of such Borrower, to be applied against the Obligations of such Borrower in such order and manner as the Administrative Agent may direct. If any Borrower is required to provide Cash Collateral pursuant to Section 3.07(a) , such amount (including interest and profits), to the extent not applied as aforesaid, shall be returned to such Borrower, provided that after giving effect to such return (i) the aggregate Credit Exposure would not exceed the aggregate Commitments at such time, and (ii) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing at such time. If any Borrower is required to provide Cash Collateral as a result of an Event of Default, such amount (to the extent not applied as aforesaid) shall be returned to such Borrower within two Business Days after all Events of Default have been cured or waived.
3.08      Use of Letters of Credit . The Letters of Credit shall be available and each Borrower agrees that it shall use Letters of Credit Issued on its account primarily (i) to support obligations under reinsurance liabilities (including intercompany liabilities) of such Borrower or for other general corporate purposes of such Borrower or (ii) with respect to Letters of Credit Issued on the account of the Parent, (a) to support obligations under reinsurance liabilities (including intercompany liabilities) of the Parent or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary and (b) for other general corporate purposes of the Parent or such Wholly Owned Subsidiary.
ARTICLE IV     
CONDITIONS OF LENDING AND ISSUANCES OF LETTERS OF CREDIT
4.01      Conditions Precedent to Effective Date . The occurrence of the Effective Date, and the obligation of each Bank to make Credit Extensions hereunder, is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions precedent:
(q)      The Administrative Agent shall have received the following, each dated the Effective Date (unless otherwise specified), in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent (unless otherwise specified) and in sufficient copies for each Bank:
(i)      Certified copies of the resolutions of the Board of Directors of each Borrower approving the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents and each Loan Document to which it is or is to be a party, and of all documents evidencing other necessary corporate action and governmental and other third party approvals and consents, if any, with transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents and each Loan Document to which it is or is to be a party.
(ii)      A certificate of each Borrower, signed on behalf of such Borrower by an Authorized Officer (the statements made in which certificate shall be true on and as of the Effective Date), certifying as to (1) the truth of the representations and warranties contained in the Loan Documents as though made on and as of the Effective Date and (2) the absence of any event occurring and continuing, or resulting from the Effective Date, that constitutes a Default.
(iii)      A certificate of an Authorized Officer of each Borrower certifying the names and true signatures of the officers of such Borrower authorized to sign

67    



each Loan Document to which it is or is to be a party and the other documents to be delivered hereunder and thereunder.
(iv)      Favorable opinions of (1) Niederer Kraft & Frey AG, Swiss counsel for the Parent, (2) Mayer Brown LLP, New York counsel for the Borrowers, (3) Conyers Dill & Pearman, Bermuda counsel for ACE Bermuda, Tempest Life and Tempest and (4) in-house counsel of ACE INA, all in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent.
(r)      There shall exist no action, suit, investigation, litigation or proceeding affecting any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries pending or threatened before any court, governmental agency or arbitrator that (x) would be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect or (y) would reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the legality, validity or enforceability of any Loan Document or the other transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents.
(s)      No development or change shall have occurred after December 31, 2011, and no information shall have become known after such date, that has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(t)      The Borrowers shall have paid all accrued fees of the Administrative Agent and the Banks and all accrued expenses of the Administrative Agent (including the accrued fees and expenses of counsel to the Administrative Agent and local counsel on behalf of all of the Banks), in each case to the extent then due and payable.
(u)      The Administrative Agent shall have received evidence satisfactory to it that all obligations of any Borrower outstanding under the Existing Reimbursement Agreement and Existing Credit Agreement shall have been repaid and satisfied in full and all commitments to lend thereunder shall have been terminated.
(v)      On the Effective Date, (i) the Borrowers, the Administrative Agent and each Bank shall have signed a counterpart of this Agreement and shall have delivered (or transmitted by telecopy) the same to the Administrative Agent; and (ii) there shall have been delivered to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Bank that has requested the same at least five Business Days prior to the Effective Date, the appropriate Note or Notes, executed by each Borrower, in each case in the amount, maturity and as otherwise provided herein.
(w)      The Administrative Agent shall have received an Account Designation Letter from an Authorized Officer of each Borrower.
(x)      Each Bank shall have received from the Borrowers at least two Business Days prior to the Effective Date all documentation and other information reasonably requested by such Bank at least five Business Days prior to the Effective Date that is required to satisfy applicable “know your customer” and anti-money laundering rules and regulations, including the Patriot Act.

68    



4.02      Conditions Precedent to all Credit Extensions . The obligation of each Bank and each Issuing Bank to make any Credit Extension (including any Credit Extension on the Effective Date, but excluding Revolving Loans made for the purpose of repaying Refunded Swingline Loans pursuant to Section 2.02(d) ) shall be subject to the further conditions precedent that on the date of such Credit Extension:
(i)      The following statements shall be true (and each request for a Credit Extension, and the acceptance by the Borrower that requested such Credit Extension shall constitute a representation and warranty by such Borrower that both on the date of such notice and on the date of such Credit Extension such statements are true):
(i)      the representations and warranties contained in each Loan Document are correct in all material respects on and as of such date, before and after giving effect to such Credit Extension, as though made on and as of such date, other than any such representations or warranties that, by their terms, refer to a specific date other the date of such Credit Extension, in which case as of such specific date ( provided , however , that the representations and warranties contained in Section 5.01(f)(i) and Section 5.01(g) shall be excluded from this clause (i) at all times after (but shall be included on and as of) the Effective Date); and
(ii)      no Default has occurred and is continuing, or would result from such Credit Extensions.
(j)      The applicable Borrower shall have delivered, as applicable, a Notice of Borrowing in accordance with Section 2.02(a) , a Notice of Swingline Borrowing in accordance with Section 2.02(c) , or a Letter of Credit Notice in accordance with Section 3.01(b) or Section 3.02(b) .
(k)      With respect to the making of any Credit Extension, the limitation on amounts set forth under Section 2.01 will not be exceeded immediately after giving effect thereto.
(l)      With respect to the Issuance of any Letter of Credit, the conditions in Section 3.04 have been satisfied.
4.03      Determinations Under Section 4.01 . For purposes of determining compliance with the conditions specified in Section 4.01 , each Bank shall be deemed to have consented to, approved or accepted or to be satisfied with each document or other matter required thereunder to be consented to or approved by or acceptable or satisfactory to the Banks unless an officer of the Administrative Agent responsible for the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents shall have received notice from such Bank prior to the Effective Date specifying its objection thereto, provided that such Bank has been given at least one Business Day’s notice that the final form of such document or matter is available for its review.


69    



ARTICLE V     
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
5.01      Representations and Warranties of the Borrowers . Each Borrower represents and warrants as follows:
(m)      Each Borrower and each of its Material Subsidiaries (i) is duly organized or formed, validly existing and, to the extent such concept applies, in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation or formation, except, in the case of any Material Subsidiary other than a Borrower, where the failure to do so would not be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect, (ii) is duly qualified and in good standing as a foreign corporation or other entity in each other jurisdiction in which it owns or leases property or in which the conduct of its business requires it to so qualify or be licensed except where the failure to so qualify or be licensed would not be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect and (iii) has all requisite power and authority (including all governmental licenses, permits and other approvals) to own or lease and operate its properties and to carry on its business as now conducted and as proposed to be conducted, except where the failure to have any license, permit or other approval would not be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(n)      All of the outstanding Equity Interests in each Borrower (other than the Parent) have been validly issued, are fully paid and non‑assessable and (except for any Preferred Securities issued after the date of this Agreement) are owned, directly or indirectly, by the Parent free and clear of all Liens.
(o)      The execution, delivery and performance by each Borrower of each Loan Document to which it is or is to be a party and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents, are within such Borrower’s corporate powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action, and do not (i) contravene such Borrower’s constitutional documents, (ii) violate any law, rule, regulation (including Regulation X of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award, (iii) conflict with or result in the breach of, or constitute a default under, any contract, loan agreement, indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, lease or other instrument binding on or affecting any Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their properties or (iv)  result in or require the creation or imposition of any Lien upon or with respect to any of the properties of any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries. No Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries is in violation of any such law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award or in breach of any such contract, loan agreement, indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, lease or other instrument, the violation or breach of which would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(p)      No authorization or approval or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any Governmental Authority or any other third party is required for (i) the due execution, delivery, recordation, filing or performance by any Borrower of any Loan Document to which it is or is to be a party or the other transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents, or (ii) the exercise by the Administrative Agent or any Bank of its rights under the Loan Documents, except

70    



for the authorizations, approvals, actions, notices and filings which have been duly obtained, taken, given or made and are in full force and effect, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws of general application relating to creditors’ rights and to general principles of equity.
(q)      This Agreement has been, and each other Loan Document when delivered hereunder will have been, duly executed and delivered by each Borrower party thereto. This Agreement is, and each other Loan Document when delivered hereunder will be, the legal, valid and binding obligation of each Borrower party thereto, enforceable against such Borrower in accordance with its terms.
(r)      There is no action, suit, investigation, litigation or proceeding affecting any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, including any Environmental Action, pending or, to such Borrower’s knowledge, threatened before any court, governmental agency or arbitrator that (i) would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect or (ii) would reasonably be expected to affect the legality, validity or enforceability of any Loan Document or the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents.
(s)      The Consolidated balance sheet of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2011, and the related Consolidated statements of income and of cash flows of the Parent and its Subsidiaries for the fiscal year then ended, accompanied by an unqualified opinion of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent public accountants, and the Consolidated balance sheet of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as at June 30, 2012, and the related Consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Parent and its Subsidiaries for the six months then ended, duly certified by the Chief Financial Officer of the Parent, copies of which have been furnished to each Bank, fairly present, subject, in the case of said balance sheet as at June 30, 2012, and said statements of income and cash flows for the six months then ended, to year‑end audit adjustments, the Consolidated financial condition of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as at such dates and the Consolidated results of operations of the Parent and its Subsidiaries for the periods ended on such dates, all in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis (subject, in the case of the June 30, 2012 balance sheet and statements of income and cash flows, to the absence of footnotes). Since December 31, 2011, there has been no Material Adverse Change.
(t)      No written information, exhibit or report furnished by or on behalf of any Borrower to any Agent or any Bank in connection with the negotiation and syndication of the Loan Documents or pursuant to the terms of the Loan Documents contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made therein not misleading as at the date it was dated (or if not dated, so delivered).
(u)      Margin Stock constitutes less than 25% of the value of those assets of any Borrower which are subject to any limitation on sale, pledge or other disposition hereunder.
(v)      Neither any Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is an “investment company”, or an “affiliated person” of, or “promoter” or “principal underwriter” for, an “investment company”, as such terms are defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940. Neither the making of any Loans, nor the Issuance of any Letters of Credit, nor the application of the proceeds or repayment thereof by any Borrower, nor the consummation of the other transactions

71    



contemplated by the Loan Documents, will violate any provision of such Act or any rule, regulation or order of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.
(w)      Each Borrower is, individually and together with its Subsidiaries, Solvent.
(x)      Except to the extent that any and all events and conditions under clauses (i) through (v) below of this Section 5.01(l) in the aggregate are not reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect:
(i)      Neither any Borrower nor any ERISA Affiliate has incurred or is reasonably expected to incur any Withdrawal Liability to any Multiemployer Plan.
(ii)      With respect to each scheme or arrangement mandated by a government other than the United States (a “ Foreign Government Scheme or Arrangement ”) and with respect to each employee benefit plan that is not subject to United States law maintained or contributed to by any Borrower or with respect to which any Subsidiary of any Borrower may have liability under applicable local law (a “ Foreign Plan ”):
(A)      Any employer and employee contributions required by law or by the terms of any Foreign Government Scheme or Arrangement or any Foreign Plan have been made, or, if applicable, accrued, in accordance with normal accounting practices.
(B)      The fair market value of the assets of each funded Foreign Plan, the liability of each insurer for any Foreign Plan funded through insurance or the book reserve established for any Foreign Plan, together with any accrued contributions, is sufficient to procure or provide for the accrued benefit obligations, as of the date hereof, with respect to all current and former participants in such Foreign Plan according to the actuarial assumptions and valuations most recently used to account for such obligations in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles.
(C)      Each Foreign Plan required to be registered has been registered and has been maintained in good standing with applicable regulatory authorities.
(iii)      During the twelve-consecutive-month period prior to the date of the execution and delivery of this Agreement and prior to the request for any Credit Extension hereunder, no steps have been taken to terminate any Pension Plan, no contribution failure has occurred with respect to any Pension Plan sufficient to give rise to a lien under section 302(f) of ERISA and no minimum funding waiver has been applied for or is in effect with respect to any Pension Plan. No condition exists or event or transaction has occurred or is reasonably

72    



expected to occur with respect to any Pension Plan which could result in any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate incurring any material liability, fine or penalty.
(iv)      Each Pension Plan is in compliance in all material respects with the applicable provisions of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code and other federal or state laws.
(v)      No assets of any Borrower are or are deemed under applicable law to be “plan assets” within the meaning of Department of Labor Regulation §2510.3-101.
(y)      In the ordinary course of its business, each Borrower reviews the effect of Environmental Laws on the operations and properties of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, in the course of which it identifies and evaluates associated liabilities and costs (including any capital or operating expenditures required for clean‑up or closure of properties presently or previously owned, any capital or operating expenditures required to achieve or maintain compliance with environmental protection standards imposed by law or as a condition of any license, permit or contract, any related constraints on operating activities, including any periodic or permanent shutdown of any facility or reduction in the level of or change in the nature of operations conducted thereat, and any actual or potential liabilities to third parties and any related costs and expenses). On the basis of this review, each Borrower has reasonably concluded that such associated liabilities and costs, including the costs of compliance with Environmental Laws, are unlikely to have a Material Adverse Effect. The operations and properties of each Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries comply in all material respects with all applicable Environmental Laws and Environmental Permits, except for non-compliances which would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; Hazardous Materials have not been released, discharged or disposed of on any property currently or formerly owned or operated by any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries that would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; and there are no Environmental Actions pending or threatened against any Borrower or its Subsidiaries, and no circumstances exist that could be reasonably likely to form the basis of any such Environmental Action, which (in either case), individually or in the aggregate with all other such pending or threatened actions and circumstances, would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(z)      Each Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries has filed, has caused to be filed or has been included in all material federal tax returns and all other material tax returns required to be filed and has paid all taxes shown thereon to be due, together with applicable interest and penalties, except to the extent contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings (in which case adequate reserves have been established therefor in accordance with GAAP).
(aa)      Set forth on Schedule II hereto is a list of all Existing Letters of Credit.
(bb)      Neither any Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is a Sanctioned Person.
(cc)      Each Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries is in compliance in all material respects with the Patriot Act. No part of any payment under any Loan or Letter of Credit will be

73    



used, directly or indirectly, for any payments to any governmental official or employee, political party, official of a political party, candidate for political office, or anyone else acting in an official capacity, in order to obtain, retain or direct business or obtain any improper advantage, in violation of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977.
(dd)      Ten Non-Bank Rule and Twenty Non-Bank Rule . The Parent is in compliance with the Ten Non-Bank Rule and the Twenty Non-Bank Rule; it being understood that the Parent shall assume for the purpose of this representation that no Bank or Transferee has (i) incorrectly declared its status as a Qualifying Bank, (ii) breached the assignment, participation, sub-participation or other transfer provisions set forth in Section 10.07 or (iii) ceased to be a Qualifying Bank after the date it became a Bank under this Agreement or otherwise a Transferee.
5.02      Representations by Banks . Each Bank represents that, as of the date of this Agreement, it is a Qualifying Bank.
ARTICLE VI     
COVENANTS OF THE BORROWERS
6.01      Affirmative Covenants . So long as any Loan, Reimbursement Obligation or any other Obligation of any Borrower under any Loan Document shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall be outstanding or any Bank shall have any Commitment hereunder, each Borrower will:
(c)      Compliance with Laws, Etc. Comply, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders, such compliance to include compliance with Environmental Laws, Environmental Permits, ERISA and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Chapter of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, except where the failure to do so, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
(d)      Payment of Taxes, Etc. Pay and discharge, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to pay and discharge, before the same shall become delinquent, all material taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies imposed upon it or upon its property; provided , however , that neither any Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries shall be required to pay or discharge any such tax, assessment, charge or levy that is being contested in good faith and by proper proceedings and as to which appropriate reserves are being maintained.
(e)      Maintenance of Insurance . Maintain, and cause each of its Material Subsidiaries to maintain, insurance with responsible and reputable insurance companies or associations in such amounts and covering such risks as is usually carried by companies engaged in similar businesses and owning similar properties in the same general areas in which the Parent or such Material Subsidiary operates (it being understood that the foregoing shall not apply to maintenance of reinsurance or similar matters which shall be solely within the reasonable business judgment of the Parent and its Subsidiaries).

74    



(f)      Preservation of Corporate Existence, Etc. Preserve and maintain, and cause each of its Material Subsidiaries to preserve and maintain, its existence, legal structure, legal name, rights (charter and statutory), permits, licenses, approvals, privileges and franchises; provided , however , that (i) the Parent and its Subsidiaries may consummate any merger or amalgamation or consolidation permitted under Section 6.02(c) , (ii) no Subsidiary (other than a Borrower) shall be required to preserve and maintain its existence, legal structure, legal names or other rights (charter and statutory) if the Board of Directors of a direct or indirect parent of such Subsidiary has determined that such action is not disadvantageous in any material respect to the Parent, such parent or the Banks, and (iii) neither the Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries shall be required to preserve any right, permit, license, approval, privilege or franchise if the Board of Directors of the Parent or such Subsidiary shall determine that the preservation thereof is no longer desirable in the conduct of the business of the Parent or such Subsidiary, as the case may be, and that the loss thereof is not disadvantageous in any material respect to the Parent, such Subsidiary or the Banks.
(g)      Visitation Rights . At any reasonable time and from time to time upon not less than three Business Days prior notice, permit the Administrative Agent (upon request made by any Agent or any Bank), or any agents or representatives thereof, at the expense (so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing) of such Agent or such Bank, as the case may be, to examine and make copies of and abstracts from the records and books of account of, and visit the properties of, the Parent and any of its Subsidiaries, and to discuss the affairs, finances and accounts of the Parent and any of its Subsidiaries with any of their officers or directors and with, so long as a representative of the Parent is present, their independent certified public accountants; provided that neither the Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries shall be required to disclose any information that it reasonably determines is entitled to the protection of attorney-client privilege or if such disclosure would violate any applicable law.
(h)      Keeping of Books . Keep, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to keep, proper books of record and account, in which full and correct entries shall be made of all financial transactions and the assets and business of the Parent and each such Subsidiary sufficient to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
(i)      Maintenance of Properties, Etc. Maintain and preserve, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to maintain and preserve, all of its properties that are used or useful in the conduct of its business in good working order and condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, except where the failure to do so would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
(j)      Transactions with Affiliates . Conduct, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to conduct, all transactions otherwise permitted under the Loan Documents with any of their Affiliates (other than any such transactions between Borrowers or Wholly Owned Subsidiaries) on terms that are fair and reasonable and no less favorable than it would obtain in a comparable arm’s-length transaction with a Person not an Affiliate.
(k)      Pari Passu Ranking . Ensure that at all times the Obligations and the claims of the Banks, the Swingline Bank, the Issuing Banks and the Agents against it under the Loan

75    



Documents will rank at least pari passu with the claims of all its other unsecured and unsubordinated creditors, except for claims which are preferred by any bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation or other similar laws of general application or are mandatorily preferred by law applying to insurance companies generally.
(l)      OFAC, Patriot Act Compliance . (i) Cause each of its Subsidiaries that is a U.S. Person to have a compliance program that is reasonably designed to comply with OFAC’s requirements; (ii) promptly after any Responsible Officer obtains knowledge thereof, cause each of its Subsidiaries that is a U.S. Person to provide notice to the Banks upon receiving a sanction on account of, or an inquiry from any Governmental Authority related to, a violation or potential violation of OFAC by such Subsidiary; (iii) not knowingly request or use the proceeds of any Credit Extension hereunder in favor of a beneficiary that is a Sanctioned Person or is organized under the laws of a Sanctioned Country; and (iv) take, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to take, to the extent commercially reasonable, such actions (including providing information) as are reasonably requested by the Administrative Agent or any Bank in order to assist the Administrative Agent and the Banks in maintaining compliance with the Patriot Act.
6.02      Negative Covenants . So long as any Loan, Reimbursement Obligation or any other Obligation of any Borrower under any Loan Document shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall be outstanding or any Bank shall have any Commitment hereunder, each of the Borrowers will not, at any time:
(c)      Liens, Etc . Create, incur, assume or suffer to exist, or permit any of its Subsidiaries to create, incur, assume or suffer to exist, any Lien on or with respect to any of its properties of any character (including accounts) whether now owned or hereafter acquired, or assign or permit any of its Subsidiaries to assign, any accounts or other right to receive income, except:
(i)      Permitted Liens;
(ii)      Liens described on Schedule 6.02(a) hereto;
(iii)      purchase money Liens upon any property acquired or held by the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business to secure the purchase price of such property or to secure Debt incurred solely for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction or improvement of any property to be subject to such Liens, or Liens existing on any property at the time of acquisition or within 180 days following such acquisition (other than any such Liens created in contemplation of such acquisition that do not secure the purchase price), or extensions, renewals or replacements of any of the foregoing for the same or a lesser amount; provided , however , that no such Lien shall extend to or cover any property other than the property being acquired, constructed or improved, and no such extension, renewal or replacement shall extend to or cover any property not theretofore subject to the Lien being extended, renewed or replaced;

76    



(iv)      Liens arising in connection with Capitalized Leases; provided that no such Lien shall extend to or cover any assets other than the assets subject to such Capitalized Leases;
(v)      (A) any Lien existing on any asset of any Person at the time such Person becomes a Subsidiary and not created in contemplation of such event, (B) any Lien on any asset of any Person existing at the time such Person is merged or consolidated with or into the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries in accordance with Section 6.02(c) and not created in contemplation of such event and (C) any Lien existing on any asset prior to the acquisition thereof by the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and not created in contemplation of such acquisition;
(vi)      Liens securing obligations under credit default swap transactions determined by reference to, or Contingent Obligations in respect of, Debt issued by the Parent or one of its Subsidiaries; such Debt not to exceed an aggregate principal amount of $550,000,000;
(vii)      Liens arising in the ordinary course of its business which (A) do not secure Debt and (B) do not in the aggregate materially detract from the value of its assets or materially impair the use thereof in the operation of its business;
(viii)      Liens on cash and Approved Investments securing Hedge Agreements arising in the ordinary course of business;
(ix)      other Liens securing Debt or other obligations outstanding in an aggregate principal or face amount not to exceed at any time 10% of Consolidated Net Worth;
(x)      Liens consisting of deposits made by the Parent or any insurance Subsidiary with any insurance regulatory authority or other statutory Liens or Liens or claims imposed or required by applicable insurance law or regulation against the assets of the Parent or any insurance Subsidiary, in each case in favor of policyholders of the Parent or such insurance Subsidiary or an insurance regulatory authority and in the ordinary course of the Parent’s or such insurance Subsidiary’s business;
(xi)      Liens on Investments and cash balances of the Parent or any insurance Subsidiary (other than capital stock of any Subsidiary) securing obligations of the Parent or any insurance Subsidiary in respect of (i) letters of credit obtained in the ordinary course of business; and/or (ii) trust arrangements formed in the ordinary course of business, or other security arrangements with any insurance Subsidiary of the Parent, in each case for the benefit of cedents to secure reinsurance recoverables owed to them by the Parent or any insurance Subsidiary;

77    



(xii)      the replacement, extension or renewal of any Lien permitted by clause (ii) or (v) above upon or in the same property theretofore subject thereto or the replacement, extension or renewal (without increase in the amount (other than in respect of fees, expenses and premiums, if any) or change in any direct or contingent obligor) of the Debt secured thereby;
(xiii)      Liens securing obligations owed by any Borrower to any other Borrower or owed by any Subsidiary of the Parent (other than a Borrower) to the Parent or any other Subsidiary;
(xiv)      Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business in favor of financial intermediaries and clearing agents pending clearance of payments for investment or in the nature of set-off, banker’s lien or similar rights as to deposit accounts or other funds;
(xv)      judgment or judicial attachment Liens, provided that the enforcement of such Liens is effectively stayed;
(xvi)      Liens arising in connection with Securitization Transactions; provided that the aggregate principal amount of the investment or claim held at any time by all purchasers, assignees or other transferees of (or of interests in) receivables and other rights to payment in all Securitization Transactions (together with the aggregate principal amount of any other obligations secured by such Liens) shall not exceed U.S. $750,000,000;
(xvii)      Liens on securities arising out of repurchase agreements with a term of not more than twelve months entered into with Banks or their Affiliates or with securities dealers of recognized standing; provided that the aggregate amount of all assets of the Parent and its Subsidiaries subject to such agreements shall not at any time exceed $2,000,000,000; and
(xviii)      Liens securing up to an aggregate amount of $200,000,000 of obligations of the Parent or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary, arising out of catastrophe bond financing.
(d)      Change in Nature of Business . Make any material change in the nature of the business of the Parent and its Material Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as carried on at the date hereof.
(e)      Mergers, Etc . Merge into or amalgamate or consolidate with any Person or permit any Person to merge into it, or permit any of its Subsidiaries to do so, except that:
(v)      any Subsidiary of the Parent may merge into or amalgamate or consolidate with any other Subsidiary of the Parent, provided that, in the case of any such merger, amalgamation or consolidation, the Person formed by such merger, amalgamation or consolidation shall be a Wholly Owned Subsidiary,

78    



provided further that, in the case of any such merger, amalgamation or consolidation to which a Borrower is a party, the Person formed by such merger, amalgamation or consolidation shall be a Borrower;
(vi)      any Subsidiary of any Borrower may merge into or amalgamate or consolidate with any other Person or permit any other Person to merge into, amalgamate or consolidate with it; provided that the Person surviving such merger, amalgamation or consolidation shall be a Wholly Owned Subsidiary;
(vii)      in connection with any sale or other disposition permitted under Section 6.02(d) , any Subsidiary of the Parent may merge into or amalgamate or consolidate with any other Person or permit any other Person to merge into or amalgamate or consolidate with it; and
(viii)      the Parent or any Borrower may merge into or amalgamate or consolidate with any other Person; provided that, in the case of any such merger, amalgamation or consolidation, the Person formed by such merger, amalgamation or consolidation shall be the Parent or such Borrower, as the case may be;
provided , however , that in each case, immediately after giving effect thereto, no event shall occur and be continuing that constitutes a Default.
(f)      Sales, Etc., of Assets . Sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, or permit any other Borrower to sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, all or substantially all of its assets (excluding sales of investment securities in the ordinary course of business).
(g)      Accounting Changes . Make or permit any change in the accounting policies or reporting practices of the Parent, except as may be required or permitted by GAAP.
6.03      Reporting Requirements . So long as any Loan, Reimbursement Obligation or any other obligation of any Borrower under any Loan Document shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall be outstanding or any Bank shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Parent will furnish to the Agents and the Banks:
(a)      Default Notice . As soon as possible and in any event within five days after the occurrence of each Default or any event, development or occurrence reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect continuing on the date of such statement, a statement of a Responsible Officer of the Parent setting forth details of such Default, event, development or occurrence and the action that the Parent or the applicable Subsidiary has taken and proposes to take with respect thereto.
(b)      Annual Financials .
(xix)      As soon as available and in any event within 90 days after the end of each Fiscal Year (or, if earlier, within five Business Days after such date as the Parent is required to file its annual report on Form 10-K for such Fiscal Year with

79    



the Securities and Exchange Commission), a copy of the annual Consolidated audit report for such year for the Parent and its Subsidiaries, including therein a Consolidated balance sheet of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as of the end of such Fiscal Year and Consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Parent and its Subsidiaries for such Fiscal Year, all reported on in a manner reasonably acceptable to the Securities and Exchange Commission in each case and accompanied by an opinion of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or other independent public accountants of recognized standing reasonably acceptable to the Required Banks, together with (A) a certificate of the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Chief Compliance Officer of the Parent stating that no Default has occurred and is continuing, or if a Default has occurred and is continuing, a statement as to the nature thereof and the action that the Parent has taken a proposes to take with respect thereto, and (B) a schedule in form reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent of the computations used by the Parent in determining, as of the end of such Fiscal Year, compliance with the covenants contained in Section 6.04 .
(xx)      As soon as available and in any event within 120 days after the end of each Fiscal Year, a copy of the annual Consolidated audit report for such year for each Borrower (other than the Parent) and its Subsidiaries, including therein a Consolidated balance sheet of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of the end of such Fiscal Year and a Consolidated statement of income and a Consolidated statement of cash flows of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such Fiscal Year, all in reasonable detail and prepared in accordance with GAAP, in each case accompanied by an opinion acceptable to the Required Banks of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or other independent public accountants of recognized standing acceptable to the Required Banks (it being understood that ACE INA shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of this clause if its financial statements are included in a footnote to the financial statements of the Parent referred to in Section 6.03(b)(i) in a manner consistent with past practice).
(xxi)      As soon as available and in any event within 20 days after submission, each statutory statement of the Borrowers (or any of them) in the form submitted to the Supervisor of Insurance, the Insurance Division of the Bermuda Monetary Authority.
(c)      Quarterly Financials . As soon as available and in any event within 45 days after the end of each of the first three quarters of each Fiscal Year (or, if earlier, within five Business Days after such date as the Parent is required to file its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for such fiscal quarter with the Securities and Exchange Commission), Consolidated balance sheets of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as of the end of such quarter and Consolidated statements of income and a Consolidated statement of cash flows of the Parent and its Subsidiaries for the period commencing at the end of the previous fiscal quarter and ending with the end of such fiscal quarter and Consolidated statements of income and a Consolidated statement of cash flows of the Parent and its Subsidiaries for the period commencing at the end of the previous Fiscal Year and

80    



ending with the end of such quarter, setting forth in each case in comparative form the corresponding figures for the corresponding date or period of the preceding Fiscal Year, all in reasonable detail and duly certified (subject to the absence of footnotes and normal year‑end audit adjustments) by the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Chief Compliance Officer of the Parent as having been prepared in accordance with GAAP, together with (i) a certificate of said officer stating that no Default has occurred and is continuing or, if a Default has occurred and is continuing, a statement as to the nature thereof and the action that the Parent has taken and proposes to take with respect thereto and (ii) a schedule in form reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent of the computations used by the Parent in determining compliance with the covenants contained in Section 6.04 .
(d)      Litigation . Promptly after the commencement thereof, notice of all actions, suits, investigations, litigation and proceedings before any court or governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, affecting any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries of the type described in Section 5.01(f) .
(e)      Securities Reports . Promptly after the sending or filing thereof, copies of all proxy statements, financial statements and reports that the Parent sends to its stockholders generally, copies of all regular, periodic and special reports, and all registration statements, that any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries files with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any Governmental Authority that may be substituted therefor, or with any national securities exchange.
(f)      ERISA .
(iii)      ERISA Events . Promptly and in any event within ten days after any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate institutes any steps to terminate any Pension Plan or becomes aware of the institution of any steps or any threat by the PBGC to terminate any Pension Plan, or the failure to make a required contribution to any Pension Plan if such failure is sufficient to give rise to a lien under section 302(f) of ERISA, or the taking of any action with respect to a Pension Plan which could result in the requirement that any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate furnish a bond or other security to the PBGC or such Pension Plan, or the occurrence of any event with respect to any Pension Plan which could result in any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate incurring any material liability, fine or penalty, or any material increase in the contingent liability of any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate with respect to any post-retirement Welfare Plan benefit, notice thereof and copies of all documentation relating thereto.
(iv)      Plan Annual Reports . Promptly upon request of any Agent or any Bank, copies of each Schedule B (Actuarial Information) to the annual report (Form 5500 Series) with respect to each Pension Plan.
(v)      Multiemployer Plan Notices . Promptly and in any event within 15 Business Days after receipt thereof by any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate from the sponsor of a Multiemployer Plan, copies of each notice concerning (A) the

81    



imposition of Withdrawal Liability by any such Multiemployer Plan, (B) the reorganization or termination, within the meaning of Title IV of ERISA, of any such Multiemployer Plan or (C) the amount of liability incurred, or that may be incurred, by such Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate in connection with any event described in clause (A) or (B); provided , however , that such notice and documentation shall not be required to be provided (except at the specific request of any Agent or any Bank, in which case such notice and documentation shall be promptly provided following such request) if such condition or event is not reasonably expected to result in any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate incurring any material liability, fine, or penalty.
(g)      Regulatory Notices, Etc . Promptly after any Responsible Officer of the Parent obtains knowledge thereof, (i) a copy of any notice from the Bermuda Minister of Finance or the Registrar of Companies or any other person of the revocation, the suspension or the placing of any restriction or condition on the registration as an insurer of any Borrower under the Bermuda Insurance Act 1978 (and related regulations) or of the institution of any proceeding or investigation which could result in any such revocation, suspension or placing of such a restriction or condition, (ii) copies of any correspondence by, to or concerning any Borrower relating to an investigation conducted by the Bermuda Minister of Finance, whether pursuant to Section 132 of the Bermuda Companies Act 1981 (and related regulations) or otherwise and (iii) a copy of any notice of or requesting or otherwise relating to the winding‑up or any similar proceeding of or with respect to any Borrower.
(h)      Other Information . Such other information respecting the business, condition (financial or otherwise), operations, performance, properties or prospects of any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries as the Administrative Agent, or any Bank through the Administrative Agent, may from time to time reasonably request. Information required to be delivered pursuant to Sections 6.03(b) , 6.03(c) , and 6.03(e) shall be deemed to have been delivered on the date on which the Parent provides notice to the Administrative Agent that such information has been posted on the Parent’s website on the Internet at the website address listed on the signature pages hereof, at sec.gov/ or at another website identified in such notice and accessible by the Banks without charge; provided that (x) such notice may be included in a certificate delivered pursuant to Section 6.03(b)(i)(A) or 6.03(c)(i) and (y) the Parent shall deliver paper copies of the information referred to in Sections 6.03(b) , 6.03(c) , and 6.03(e) to any Bank which requests such delivery.
6.04      Financial Covenants . So long as any Loan, Reimbursement Obligation or any other obligation of any Borrower under any Loan Document shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall be outstanding or any Bank shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Parent will:
(k)      Adjusted Consolidated Debt to Total Capitalization Ratio . Maintain at all times a ratio of Adjusted Consolidated Debt to Total Capitalization of not more than 0.35 to 1.0.
(l)      Consolidated Net Worth . Maintain at all times Consolidated Net Worth in an amount not less than the Minimum Amount. For this purpose, the “ Minimum Amount ” is an amount equal to the sum of (i) the then-current Base Amount plus (ii) (A) 25% of Consolidated

82    



Net Income for each completed fiscal quarter of the Parent for which Consolidated Net Income is positive and that ends after the date on which the then-current Base Amount became effective and on or before the last day of the then-current Fiscal Year and (B) 50% of any increase in Consolidated Net Worth during such period attributable to the issuance of ordinary or preferred shares. The “ Base Amount ” shall be $17,486,776,000 as of June 30, 2012 and shall be reset on the earlier of (A) the date of the delivery of the Parent’s financial statements for any Fiscal Year pursuant to Section 6.03(b)(i) (beginning with the financial statements for the Fiscal Year ending December 31, 2012) and (B) March 30 th of each Fiscal Year (beginning March 30 th 2013), to an amount equal to the greater of (x) 70% of Consolidated Net Worth as of the last day of the immediately preceding Fiscal Year and (y) the Minimum Amount in effect as of the last day of the immediately preceding Fiscal Year.
ARTICLE VII     
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
7.01      Events of Default . If any of the following events (“ Events of Default ”) shall occur and be continuing:
(h)      (i) any Borrower shall fail to pay any Loan or Reimbursement Obligation when and as the same shall become due and payable, or (ii) any Borrower shall fail to make any payment of interest on any Loan or Reimbursement Obligation, any fee or any other amount payable by such Borrower under any Loan Document, in each case under this clause (ii) within five Business Days after the same becomes due and payable; or
(i)      any representation or warranty made by any Borrower (or any of its officers) under or in connection with any Loan Document (excluding the representation and warranty set forth in Section 5.01(r) ) shall prove to have been incorrect in any material respect when made; or
(j)      any Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 2.13 , 3.08 , 6.01(d) (solely with respect to the existence of the Parent), 6.02 , 6.03(a) or 6.04 ; or
(k)      any Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 6.01(e) if such failure shall remain unremedied for five Business Days after written notice thereof shall have been given to such Borrower by any Agent or any Bank; or
(l)      any Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any other term, covenant or agreement contained in any Loan Document on its part to be performed or observed if such failure shall remain unremedied for 30 days after the earlier of the date on which (i) a Responsible Officer becomes aware of such failure or (ii) written notice thereof shall have been given to such Borrower by any Agent or any Bank; or
(m)      the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries shall fail to pay any Material Financial Obligation (but excluding Debt outstanding hereunder) of the Parent or such Subsidiary (as the

83    



case may be), when the same becomes due and payable (whether by scheduled maturity, required prepayment, acceleration, demand or otherwise), and such failure shall continue after the applicable grace period, if any, specified in the agreement or instrument relating to such Material Financial Obligation; or any such Material Financial Obligation shall be declared to be due and payable or required to be prepaid or redeemed (other than by a regularly scheduled required prepayment or redemption), purchased or defeased, or an offer to prepay, redeem, purchase or defease such Material Financial Obligation shall be required to be made, in each case prior to the stated maturity thereof; or
(n)      any Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries shall generally not pay its debts as such debts become due, or shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally, or shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or any proceeding shall be instituted by or against any Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries seeking to adjudicate it a bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking liquidation, winding up, reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, protection, relief, or composition of it or its debts under any law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization or relief of debtors, or seeking the entry of an order for relief or the appointment of a receiver, trustee, or other similar official for it or for any substantial part of its property and, in the case of any such proceeding instituted against it (but not instituted by it) that is being diligently contested by it in good faith, either such proceeding shall remain undismissed or unstayed for a period of 60 days or any of the actions sought in such proceeding (including the entry of an order for relief against, or the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for, it or any substantial part of its property) shall occur; or any Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries shall take any corporate action to authorize any of the actions set forth above in this Section 7.01(g) ; or
(o)      any final judgment or order for the payment of money in excess of $100,000,000 shall be rendered against any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries and either (i) enforcement proceedings shall have been commenced by any creditor upon such judgment or order or (ii) there shall be any period of 30 consecutive days during which a stay of enforcement of such judgment or order, by reason of a pending appeal or otherwise, shall not be in effect; or
(p)      any provision in Article VIII of this Agreement shall for any reason cease to be valid and binding on or enforceable against any Borrower (other than as a result of a transaction permitted hereunder), or any such Borrower shall so state in writing; or
(q)      a Change of Control shall occur; or
(r)      any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate shall incur or shall be reasonably expected to incur liability in excess of $25,000,000 in the aggregate with respect to any Pension Plan or any Multiemployer Plan in connection with the occurrence of any of the following events or existence of any of the following conditions:
(i)      Institution of any steps by any Borrower, any ERISA Affiliate or any other Person, including the PBGC to terminate a Pension Plan if as a result of such termination a Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate would reasonably expect to

84    



be required to make a contribution to such Pension Plan, or would reasonably expect to incur a liability or obligation; or
(ii)      A contribution failure occurs with respect to any Pension Plan sufficient to give rise to a lien under section 302(f) of ERISA; or
(iii)      Any condition shall exist or event shall occur with respect to a Pension Plan that is reasonably expected to result in any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate being required to furnish a bond or security to the PBGC or such Pension Plan, or incurring a liability or obligation; or
(s)      any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate shall have been notified by the sponsor of a Multiemployer Plan that it has incurred Withdrawal Liability or a default, within the meaning of Section 4219(c)(5) of ERISA, has occurred with respect to such Multiemployer Plan which could cause any Borrower or any ERISA Affiliate to incur a payment obligation in excess of $25,000,000;
then, and in any such event, the Administrative Agent (i) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Required Banks, by notice to the Borrowers, declare the Commitments and the Swingline Commitment and the obligation of the Issuing Banks to Issue Letters of Credit to be terminated, whereupon the same shall forthwith terminate, (ii) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Required Banks, by notice to the Borrowers, declare all or any part of the outstanding Loans and other amounts payable under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents to be forthwith due and payable, whereupon all such amounts shall become and be forthwith due and payable, without presentment, demand, notice of intent to accelerate, protest or further notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrowers; provided , however , that in the event of an actual or deemed entry of an order for relief with respect to any Borrower under any Bankruptcy Law, (x) the Commitments and Swingline Commitment and the obligation of the Issuing Banks to Issue Letters of Credit shall automatically be terminated, (y) all such amounts shall automatically become and be due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or any notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrowers and (z) the obligation of the Borrowers to provide cash collateral under Section 7.02 shall automatically become effective, and/or (iii) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Required Banks, exercise all rights and remedies available to it under this Agreement, the other Loan Documents and applicable law.
7.02      Actions in Respect of the Letters of Credit upon Default . If any Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, the Administrative Agent may, or shall at the request of the Required Banks, after having taken any of the actions described in Section 7.01(ii) or otherwise, make demand upon the Borrowers to, and forthwith upon such demand the Borrowers will, pay to the Administrative Agent on behalf of the Banks in same day funds at the Administrative Agent’s office designated in such demand, an amount equal to the aggregate Stated Amount of all Letters of Credit then outstanding as cash collateral. If at any time during the existence of an Event of Default the Administrative Agent determines that such funds are subject to any right or claim of any Person other than the Administrative Agent and the Banks or that the total amount of such funds is less than the aggregate Stated Amount of all Letters of

85    



Credit, the Borrowers will, forthwith upon demand by the Administrative Agent, pay to the Administrative Agent, as additional cash collateral, an amount equal to the excess of (a) such aggregate Stated Amount over (b) the total amount of funds, if any, that the Administrative Agent determines to be free and clear of any such right and claim. Upon the drawing of any Letter of Credit, such funds shall be applied to reimburse the Issuing Banks or Banks, as applicable, to the extent permitted by applicable law.
ARTICLE VIII     
THE GUARANTY
8.01      The Guaranty . The Parent hereby unconditionally, absolutely and irrevocably guarantees, as a primary obligor and not merely as surety, the full and punctual payment (whether at stated maturity, upon acceleration or otherwise) of all Obligations of the other Borrowers under the Loan Documents including the principal of and interest (including, to the greatest extent permitted by law, post-petition interest) on Loans and Reimbursement Obligations owing by such other Borrowers pursuant to this Agreement with respect to Loans and Letters of Credit and fees, expenses, indemnities or any other obligations, whether now existing or hereafter incurred, created or arising and whether direct or indirect, absolute or contingent, or due or to become due. This Guaranty is a guaranty of payment and not of collection. Upon failure by any Borrower to pay punctually any such amount, the Parent agrees to pay forthwith on demand the amount not so paid at the place and in the manner specified in this Agreement.
8.02      Guaranty Unconditional . The obligations of the Parent under this Article VIII shall be unconditional, absolute and irrevocable and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, shall not be released, discharged or otherwise affected by:
(v)      any extension, renewal, settlement, compromise, waiver or release in respect of any obligation of any other obligor under any of the Loan Documents, by operation of law or otherwise;
(vi)      any modification or amendment of or supplement to any of the Loan Documents;
(vii)      any release, non-perfection or invalidity of any direct or indirect security for any obligation of any other obligor under any of the Loan Documents;
(viii)      any change in the corporate existence, structure or ownership of any obligor, or any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization or other similar proceeding affecting any other obligor or its assets or any resulting release or discharge of any obligation of any other obligor contained in any of the Loan Documents;
(ix)      the existence of any claim, set-off or other rights which any obligor may have at any time against any other obligor, the Administrative Agent, any Bank or any other corporation or person, whether in connection with any of the

86    



Loan Documents or any unrelated transactions, provided that nothing herein shall prevent the assertion of any such claim by separate suit or compulsory counterclaim;
(x)      any invalidity or unenforceability relating to or against any other obligor for any reason of any of the Loan Documents, or any provision of applicable law or regulation purporting to prohibit the payment by any other obligor of principal interest or any other amount payable under any of the Loan Documents;
(xi)      any law, regulation or order of any jurisdiction, or any other event, affecting any term of any obligation of the Banks’ rights with respect thereto; or
(xii)      any other act or omission to act or delay of any kind by any obligor, the Administrative Agent, any Bank or any other corporation or person or any other circumstance whatsoever which might, but for the provisions of this paragraph, constitute a legal or equitable discharge of or defense to the Parent’s obligations under this Article VIII .
8.03      Discharge Only upon Payment in Full; Reinstatement in Certain Circumstances . The Parent’s obligations under this Article VIII shall remain in full force and effect until the Commitments of the Banks and the Swingline Commitment of the Swingline Bank hereunder shall have terminated, no Letters of Credit shall be outstanding and all Obligations payable by the other Borrowers under the Loan Documents shall have been paid in full. If at any time any payment of any Obligation by a Borrower under the Loan Documents is rescinded or must be otherwise restored or returned upon the insolvency, bankruptcy or reorganization of such Borrower or otherwise, the Parent’s obligations under this Article VIII with respect to such payment shall be reinstated as though such payment had been due but not made at such time.
8.04      Waiver by the Parent . The Parent irrevocably waives acceptance hereof, presentment, demand, protest and any notice not provided for herein, as well as any requirement that at any time any action be taken by any corporation or person against any other obligor or any other corporation or person.
8.05      Subrogation . The Parent hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agrees not to exercise any rights that it may now have or hereafter acquire against any other Borrower, or any other insider guarantor that arise from the existence, payment, performance or enforcement of the Parent’s obligations under or in respect of this Guaranty or any other Loan Document, including any right of subrogation, reimbursement, exoneration, contribution or indemnification and any right to participate in any claim or remedy of any Bank against any other Borrower, or any other insider guarantor or any collateral, whether or not such claim, remedy or right arises in equity or under contract, statute or common law, including the right to take or receive from any other Borrower, or any other insider guarantor, directly or indirectly, in cash or other property or by set-off or in any other manner, payment or security on account of such claim, remedy or right, unless and until all amounts payable under this Guaranty shall have been paid in full in cash, no Letters of Credit shall be outstanding and the Commitments of the Banks and the Swingline

87    



Commitment of the Swingline Bank hereunder shall have expired or been terminated. If any amount shall be paid to the Parent in violation of the immediately preceding sentence at any time prior to the latest of (a) the payment in full in cash of all amounts payable under this Guaranty, and (b) the L/C Maturity Date, such amount shall be received and held in trust for the benefit of the Banks, shall be segregated from other property and funds of the Parent and shall forthwith be paid or delivered to the Administrative Agent in the same form as so received (with any necessary endorsement or assignment) to be credited and applied to all amounts payable under this Guaranty, whether matured or unmatured, in accordance with the terms of the Loan Documents, or to be held as collateral for any amounts payable under this Guaranty thereafter arising. If (i) the Parent shall make payment to any Bank of all or any amounts payable under this Guaranty, (ii) all amounts payable under this Guaranty shall have been paid in full in cash, and (iii) the L/C Maturity Date shall have occurred, the Banks will, at the Parent’s request and expense, execute and deliver to the Parent appropriate documents, without recourse and without representation or warranty, necessary to evidence the transfer by subrogation to the Parent of an interest in the obligations resulting from such payment made by the Parent pursuant to this Guaranty.
8.06      Stay of Acceleration . If acceleration of the time for payment of any amount payable by any Borrower under any of the Loan Documents is stayed upon the insolvency, bankruptcy or reorganization of such Borrower, all such amounts otherwise subject to acceleration under the terms of this Agreement shall nonetheless be payable by the Parent under this Article VIII forthwith on demand by the Administrative Agent made at the request of the requisite proportion of the Banks.
8.07      Continuing Guaranty; Assignments . This Guaranty is a continuing guaranty and shall (a) remain in full force and effect until the latest of (i) the payment in full in cash of all Obligations payable under this Guaranty and (ii) the L/C Maturity Date, (b) be binding upon the Parent, its successors and assigns and (c) inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Banks, the Swingline Bank, the Banks and their successors, transferees and assigns. Without limiting the generality of clause (c) of the immediately preceding sentence, any Bank may assign or otherwise transfer all or any portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or any portion of its Commitment and the Loans and Reimbursement Obligations owing to it) to any other Person, and such other Person shall thereupon become vested with all the benefits in respect thereof granted to such Bank herein or otherwise, in each case as and to the extent provided in Section 10.07 .
8.08      Subordination of Other Obligations . Any Debt of any Borrower now or hereafter held by the Parent is hereby subordinated in right of payment to the Obligations of such Borrower, and any such Debt collected or received by the Parent after receipt of notice of an Event of Default (which has occurred and is continuing) by the Administrative Agent shall be held in trust for the Administrative Agent on behalf of the Banks and shall forthwith be paid over to Administrative Agent for the benefit of Banks to be credited and applied against such Obligations but without affecting, impairing or limiting in any manner the liability of the Parent under any other provision hereof.

88    



ARTICLE IX     
THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
9.01      Appointment and Authority . Each of the Banks (for purposes of this Article, references to the Banks shall also mean each Issuing Bank and the Swingline Bank) hereby irrevocably appoints Wells Fargo to act on its behalf as the Administrative Agent hereunder and under the other Loan Documents and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such actions on its behalf and to exercise such powers as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms hereof or thereof, together with such actions and powers as are reasonably incidental thereto. The provisions of this Article are solely for the benefit of the Administrative Agent, the Swingline Bank, the Banks and the Issuing Banks, and no Borrower shall have rights as a third-party beneficiary of any of such provisions. It is understood and agreed that the use of the term “agent” herein or in any other Loan Documents (or any other similar term) with reference to the Administrative Agent is not intended to connote any fiduciary or other implied (or express) obligations arising under agency doctrine of any applicable law. Instead such term is used as a matter of market custom, and is intended to create or reflect only an administrative relationship between contracting parties.
9.02      Rights as a Bank . The Person serving as the Administrative Agent hereunder shall have the same rights and powers in its capacity as a Bank as any other Bank and may exercise the same as though it were not the Administrative Agent and the term “Bank” or “Banks” shall, unless otherwise expressly indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, include the Person serving as the Administrative Agent hereunder in its individual capacity. Such Person and its Affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to, own securities of, act as the financial advisor or in any other advisory capacity for and generally engage in any kind of business with any Borrower or any Subsidiary or other Affiliate thereof as if such Person were not the Administrative Agent hereunder and without any duty to account therefor to the Banks.
9.03      Exculpatory Provisions . The Administrative Agent shall not have any duties or obligations except those expressly set forth herein and in the other Loan Documents and its duties hereunder shall be administrative in nature. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Administrative Agent:
(c)      shall not be subject to any fiduciary or other implied duties, regardless of whether a Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing;
(d)      shall not have any duty to take any discretionary action or exercise any discretionary powers, except discretionary rights and powers expressly contemplated hereby or by the other Loan Documents that the Administrative Agent is required to exercise as directed in writing by the Required Banks (or such other number or percentage of the Banks as shall be expressly provided for herein or in the other Loan Documents), provided that the Administrative Agent shall not be required to take any action that, in its opinion or the opinion of its counsel, may expose the Administrative Agent to liability or that is contrary to any Loan Document or applicable law, including for the avoidance of doubt any action that may be in violation of the

89    



automatic stay under any Bankruptcy Law or that may effect a forfeiture, modification or termination of property of a Defaulting Bank in violation of any Bankruptcy Law; and
(e)      shall not, except as expressly set forth herein and in the other Loan Documents, have any duty to disclose, and shall not be liable for the failure to disclose, any information relating to any Borrower or any Affiliate thereof that is communicated to or obtained by the Person serving as the Administrative Agent or any of its Affiliates in any capacity.
The Administrative Agent shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it (i) with the consent or at the request of the Required Banks (or such other number or percentage of the Banks as shall be necessary, or as the Administrative Agent shall believe in good faith shall be necessary, under the circumstances as provided in Section 7.01 , Section 7.02 and Section 10.01 ) or (ii) in the absence of its own gross negligence or willful misconduct as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction by final and nonappealable judgment. The Administrative Agent shall be deemed not to have knowledge of any Default or Event of Default unless and until notice describing such Default or Event of Default is given to the Administrative Agent in writing by a Borrower, an Issuing Bank or a Bank.
The Administrative Agent shall not be responsible for or have any duty to ascertain or inquire into (i) any statement, warranty or representation made in or in connection with this Agreement or any other Loan Document, (ii) the contents of any certificate, report or other document delivered hereunder or thereunder or in connection herewith or therewith, (iii) the performance or observance of any of the covenants, agreements or other terms or conditions set forth herein or therein or the occurrence of any Default or Event of Default, (iv) the validity, enforceability, effectiveness or genuineness of this Agreement, any other Loan Document or any other agreement, instrument or document or (v) the satisfaction of any condition set forth in Article IV or elsewhere herein, other than to confirm receipt of items expressly required to be delivered to the Administrative Agent.
9.04      Reliance by Administrative Agent . The Administrative Agent shall be entitled to rely upon, and shall not incur any liability for relying upon, any notice, request, certificate, consent, statement, instrument, document or other writing (including any electronic message, internet or intranet website posting or other distribution) believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed, sent or otherwise authenticated by the proper Person. The Administrative Agent also may rely upon any statement made to it orally or by telephone and believed by it to have been made by the proper Person, and shall not incur any liability for relying thereon. In determining compliance with any condition hereunder to the making of a Loan, or the Issuance of a Letter of Credit, that by its terms must be fulfilled to the satisfaction of a Bank or any Issuing Bank, the Administrative Agent may presume that such condition is satisfactory to such Bank or such Issuing Bank unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice to the contrary from such Bank or such Issuing Bank prior to the making of such Loan or the issuance of such Letter of Credit. The Administrative Agent may consult with legal counsel (who may be counsel for one or more Borrowers), independent accountants and other experts selected by it, and shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it in accordance with the advice of any such counsel, accountants or experts.

90    



9.05      Delegation of Duties . The Administrative Agent may perform any and all of its duties and exercise its rights and powers hereunder or under any other Loan Document by or through any one or more sub-agents appointed by the Administrative Agent. The Administrative Agent and any such sub-agent may perform any and all of its duties and exercise its rights and powers by or through their respective Related Parties. The exculpatory provisions of this Article shall apply to any such sub-agent and to the Related Parties of the Administrative Agent and any such sub-agent, and shall apply to their respective activities in connection with the syndication of the credit facility provided for herein as well as activities as Administrative Agent. The Administrative Agent shall not be responsible for the negligence or misconduct of any sub-agents except to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction determines in a final and nonappealable judgment that the Administrative Agent acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct in the selection of such sub-agents.
9.06      Successor Administrative Agent . The Administrative Agent may resign at any time by giving written notice thereof to the Banks and the Parent. Upon any such resignation of the Administrative Agent, the Required Banks shall have the right to appoint a successor Administrative Agent, subject (so long as no Event of Default exists) to the consent of the Parent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld). If no successor Administrative Agent shall have been so appointed by the Required Banks, and shall have accepted such appointment, within 30 days after the retiring Administrative Agent’s giving of notice of resignation, then the retiring Administrative Agent may (but shall not be obligated to), on behalf of the Banks, appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which shall be a commercial bank organized under the laws of the United States or of any State thereof and having a combined capital and surplus of at least $250,000,000. Upon the acceptance of any appointment as Administrative Agent hereunder by a successor Administrative Agent such successor Administrative Agent shall succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, discretion, privileges and duties of the retiring Administrative Agent (other than any rights to indemnity payments owing to the retiring Administrative Agent), and the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations under the Loan Documents. If within 45 days after written notice is given of the retiring Administrative Agent’s resignation under this Section 9.06 no successor Administrative Agent shall have been appointed and shall have accepted such appointment, then on such 45 th day (i) the retiring Administrative Agent’s resignation or removal shall become effective, (ii) the retiring Administrative Agent shall thereupon be discharged from its duties and obligations under the Loan Documents and (iii) the Required Banks shall thereafter perform all duties of the retiring Administrative Agent under the Loan Documents until such time, if any, as the Required Banks appoint a successor Administrative Agent as provided above. After any retiring Administrative Agent’s resignation hereunder as Administrative Agent shall have become effective, the provisions of this Article IX shall inure to the benefit of such retiring Administrative Agent, its sub-agents and their respective Related Parties as to any actions taken or omitted to be taken by it while it was Administrative Agent under this Agreement.
9.07      Non-Reliance on Administrative Agent and Other Banks . Each Bank acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Bank or any of their Related Parties and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this

91    



Agreement. Each Bank also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Bank or any of their Related Parties and based on such documents and information as it shall from time to time deem appropriate, continue to make its own decisions in taking or not taking action under or based upon this Agreement, any other Loan Document or any related agreement or any document furnished hereunder or thereunder.
9.08      No Other Duties, Etc . Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, none of the Joint Lead Arrangers, Syndication Agents, Documentation Agents or other agents listed on the cover page hereof shall have any powers, duties or responsibilities under this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, except in its capacity, as applicable, as the Administrative Agent or a Bank hereunder.
9.09      Administrative Agent May File Proofs of Claim . In case of the pendency of any proceeding under any Bankruptcy Law or any other judicial proceeding relative to any Borrower, the Administrative Agent (irrespective of whether the principal of any Loan or Reimbursement Obligation shall then be due and payable as herein expressed or by declaration or otherwise and irrespective of whether the Administrative Agent shall have made any demand on any Borrower) shall be entitled and empowered (but not obligated) by intervention in such proceeding or otherwise (i) to file and prove a claim for the whole amount of the principal and interest owing and unpaid in respect of the Loans, Reimbursement Obligations and all other Obligations that are owing and unpaid and to file such other documents as may be necessary advisable in order to have the claims of the Banks, Issuing Banks and the Administrative Agent (including any claim for the reasonable compensation, expenses, disbursements and advances of the Banks, Issuing Banks and the Administrative Agent and their respective agents, sub-agents and counsel and all other amounts due the Banks, Issuing Banks and the Administrative Agent under Sections 2.09 and 10.04 ) allowed in such judicial proceeding and (ii) to collect and receive any monies or other property payable or deliverable on any such claims and to distribute the same. Any custodian, receiver, assignee, trustee, liquidator, sequestrator or other similar official in any such judicial proceeding is hereby authorized by each Bank and Issuing Bank to make such payments to the Administrative Agent and, in the event that the Administrative Agent shall consent to the making of such payments to the Banks or Issuing Banks, to pay to the Administrative Agent any amount due for the reasonable compensation, expenses, disbursements and advances of the Administrative Agent and its agents, sub-agents and counsel, and any other amounts due the Administrative Agent under Section 2.09 or 10.04 . Notwithstanding anything in this Section 9.09 to the contrary, nothing contained herein shall be deemed to authorize the Administrative Agent to authorize or consent to or accept or adopt on behalf of any Bank or any Issuing Bank any plan of reorganization, arrangement, adjustment or composition affecting the Obligations or the rights of any Bank or any Issuing Bank or to authorize the Administrative Agent to vote in respect of the claim of any Bank or any Issuing Bank in any such proceeding.
9.10      Issuing Bank and Swingline Bank . The provisions of this Article IX (other than Section 9.06 ) shall apply to the Issuing Banks and the Swingline Bank mutatis mutandis to the same extent as such provisions apply to the Administrative Agent.


92    



ARTICLE X     
MISCELLANEOUS
10.01      Amendments, Etc .
(d)      No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement or any other Loan Document, nor consent to any departure by any Borrower therefrom, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the Required Banks (or by the Administrative Agent at the direction or with the consent of the Required Banks) (and, in the case of an amendment, the Parent), and then any such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given; provided , however , that no amendment, waiver or consent shall:
(vi)      unless in writing and signed by all of the Banks (other than any Bank that is, at such time, a Defaulting Bank), do any of the following at any time: (i) waive any of the conditions specified in Section 4.01 , in the case of the Effective Date, or Section 4.02 , (ii) change the number of Banks or the percentage of (x) the Commitments, or (y) the Credit Exposure that, in each case, shall be required for the Banks or any of them to take any action hereunder, (iii) reduce or limit the obligations of the Parent under Article VIII or release the Parent or otherwise limit the Parent’s liability with respect to the obligations owing to the Agents and the Banks, (iv) amend this Section 10.01 or any of the definitions herein that would have such effect, (v) extend the Maturity Date or the L/C Maturity Date, (vi) limit the liability of any Borrower under any of the Loan Documents or (vii) change or waive any provision of Section 2.14 or any other provision of this Agreement requiring the ratable treatment of the Banks;
(vii)      unless in writing and signed by each affected Bank, do any of the following at any time: (i) increase the Commitments of the Banks or subject the Banks to any additional obligations, (ii) reduce the principal of, or interest on, any Loan or Reimbursement Obligation or any fees or other amounts payable hereunder, or increase any Bank’s Commitment, or (iii) postpone any date fixed for any payment of principal of, or interest on, any Loan or Reimbursement Obligation or any fees or other amounts payable hereunder;
provided further that no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by an Agent or L/C Agent in addition to the Banks required above to take such action, affect the rights or duties of such Agent or L/C Agent, as applicable, under this Agreement or the other Loan Documents and no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by an Issuing Bank or the Swingline Bank in addition to the Banks above required to take such action, affect the rights or duties of such Issuing Bank or Swingline Bank, as applicable, under this Agreement or the other Loan Documents;

93    



and provided further that the Fee Letters may only be amended or modified, and any rights thereunder waived, in a writing signed by the parties thereto.
(e)      Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, (i) no Defaulting Bank shall have any right to approve or disapprove any amendment, waiver or consent hereunder (and any amendment, waiver or consent which by its terms requires the consent of all Banks or each affected Bank may be effected with the consent of the applicable Banks other than Defaulting Banks), except that (x) the Commitment of any Defaulting Bank may not be increased or extended without the consent of such Bank and (y) any waiver, amendment or modification requiring the consent of all Banks or each affected Bank that by its terms affects any Defaulting Bank more adversely than other affected Banks shall require the consent of such Defaulting Bank and (ii) if the Administrative Agent and the Parent shall have jointly identified (each in its sole discretion) an obvious error or omission of a technical or immaterial nature, in each case, in any provision of the Loan Documents, then the Administrative Agent and the Parent shall be permitted to amend such provision and such amendment shall become effective without any further action or consent of any other party to any Loan Document if the same is not objected to in writing by the Required Banks within five Business Days following the posting of such amendment to the Banks.
10.02      Notices, Etc . All notices and other communications provided for hereunder shall be in writing (including telegraphic or telecopy communication) and mailed, telegraphed, telecopied or delivered, as follows:
if to the Parent:

Bärengasse 32
CH‑8001 Zürich
Switzerland
Fax: +41 (0) 43 456 76 01;
if to ACE Bermuda, Tempest Life or Tempest:

17 Woodbourne Avenue
Hamilton HM08 Bermuda
Fax: (441) 296-0087;

if to ACE INA:
        
436 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 USA
Fax: (215) 640-4796

if to any Bank, at its Applicable Lending Office;


94    



if to Wells Fargo (in its capacity as Issuing Bank) at its address at 401 Linden Street, Mail Code NC-6034, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101, Attn: International Operations -- Standby Letter of Credit Department, Telecopy No. (336) 735-0952, with a copy to Karen Hanke, Director, 301 South College Street, 15 th Floor , Charlotte, NC 28288, Telecopy No. (704) 715-1486; and

if to Wells Fargo (in its capacity as Administrative Agent or Swingline Bank), at its address at 1525 West W.T. Harris Blvd., Mailcode D1109-019, Charlotte, North Carolina 28262, Attn: Syndication Agency Services, Telecopy No. (704) 590-2790, with a copy to Karen Hanke, Director, 301 South College Street, 15 th Floor , Charlotte, NC 28288, Telecopy No. (704) 715-1486;

or, as to any party, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the other parties.

All such notices and communications shall, when mailed, telegraphed or telecopied, be effective when deposited in the mails, delivered to the telegraph company or transmitted by telecopier, respectively, except that notices and communications to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Article II , III , IV or IX shall not be effective until received by the Administrative Agent. Manual delivery by telecopier of an executed counterpart of any amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement or of any Exhibit hereto to be executed and delivered hereunder shall be effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart thereof.

10.03      No Waiver; Remedies . No failure on the part of any Bank, the Swingline Bank, any Issuing Bank or any Agent to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law.
10.04      Costs and Expenses; Indemnity .
(c)      Each of the Borrowers agrees to pay on demand (i) all reasonable and documented costs and expenses of the Agents, the Joint Lead Arrangers, each Issuing Bank and the Swingline Bank, in connection with the preparation, execution, delivery, administration, modification and amendment of the Loan Documents (including (A) all due diligence, collateral review, syndication, transportation, computer, duplication, appraisal, audit, insurance, consultant, search, filing and recording fees and expenses and (B) the reasonable and documented fees and expenses of a single counsel for the Administrative Agent and Wells Fargo in its capacity as an Issuing Bank, with respect to advising the Administrative Agent as to its rights and responsibilities, or the perfection, protection or preservation of rights or interests, under the Loan Documents, with respect to negotiations with any Borrower or with other creditors of any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries arising out of any Default or any events or circumstances that may give rise to a Default and with respect to presenting claims in or otherwise participating in or monitoring any bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar proceeding involving creditors’ rights generally and any proceeding ancillary thereto), it being agreed that the expenses incurred in

95    



connection with the preparation, negotiation, execution and delivery of the Commitment Letter, this Agreement and the other Loan Documents on or before the Effective Date shall be subject to the limitations set forth in the Commitment Letter; and (ii) all reasonable and documented costs and expenses of each Agent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank and each Bank in connection with the enforcement of the Loan Documents, whether in any action, suit or litigation, or any bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar proceeding affecting creditors’ rights generally (including the reasonable and documented fees and expenses of counsel for the Administrative Agent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank and each Bank with respect thereto); provided that the Borrowers shall only be obligated to pay the fees and expenses of a single counsel for the Banks (as opposed to the Administrative Agent) unless, and to the extent that, such counsel reasonably determines that an irreconcilable conflict requires the engagement of additional counsel.
(d)      Each of the Borrowers severally agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each Agent, each Joint Lead Arranger, the L/C Agent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank, each Bank and each of their Affiliates and each Related Party of any of the foregoing Persons (each, an “ Indemnified Party ”) from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities and expenses (including reasonable and documented fees and expenses of counsel) that may be incurred by or asserted or awarded against any Indemnified Party, in each case arising out of or in connection with or by reason of (including in connection with any investigation, litigation or proceeding or preparation of a defense in connection therewith) this Agreement, the actual or proposed use of the proceeds of the Loans or the Letters of Credit, the Loan Documents or any of the transactions contemplated thereby, except to the extent such claim, damage, loss, liability or expense is found in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnified Party or any of its Affiliates; provided that the Borrowers shall only be obligated to pay the fees and expenses of a single counsel for the Indemnified Parties unless, and to the extent that, such counsel reasonably determines that a conflict requires the engagement of additional counsel. In the case of an investigation, litigation or other proceeding to which the indemnity in this Section 10.04(b) applies, such indemnity shall be effective whether or not such investigation, litigation or proceeding is brought by any Borrower, its directors, shareholders or creditors or an Indemnified Party or any Indemnified Party is otherwise a party thereto and whether or not the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents are consummated. Each of the Borrowers also agrees not to assert any claim against any Agent, any Joint Lead Arranger, the L/C Agent, the Swingline Bank, any Issuing Bank, any Bank or any of their Affiliates, or any of their respective officers, directors, employees, attorneys and agents, on any theory of liability, for special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or otherwise relating to the credit facilities provided hereunder, the actual or proposed use of the proceeds of the Loans or Letters of Credit, the Loan Documents or any of the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents.
(e)      To the extent that the Borrowers for any reason fail indefeasibly to pay any amount required under Section 10.04(a) or Section 10.04(b) to be paid by it to any Agent, any Joint Lead Arranger, the L/C Agent, any Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank or any Related Party of any of the foregoing, each Bank severally agrees to pay to such Agent, such Joint Lead Arranger, the L/C Agent, such Issuing Bank, such Swingline Bank or such Related Party, as the

96    



case may be, such Bank’s Pro Rata Share (as of the time that the applicable unreimbursed expense or indemnity payment is sought) of such unpaid amount, provided that the unreimbursed expense or indemnified loss, claim, damage, liability or related expense, as the case may be, was incurred by or asserted against such Agent, such Joint Lead Arranger, the L/C Agent, such Issuing Bank, or the Swingline Bank in its capacity as such, or against any Related Party of any of the foregoing acting for such Person in connection with such capacity. The obligations of the Banks under this Section 10.04(c) are subject to the provisions of Section 2.03(c) .
(f)      Without prejudice to the survival of any other agreement hereunder or under any other Loan Document, the agreements and obligations contained in Sections 2.15 , 2.16 , 2.17 and this Section 10.04 shall survive the payment in full of principal, interest and all other amounts payable hereunder and under any of the other Loan Documents.
10.05      Right of Set‑off . Upon (a) (i) the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default and (ii) the making of the request or the granting of the consent specified by Section 7.01 to authorize the Administrative Agent to declare amounts owing hereunder to be due and payable pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.01 or (b) the automatic acceleration of amounts owing hereunder pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.01 due to an actual or deemed entry of an order for relief with respect to any Borrower under any Bankruptcy Law, each Agent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank and each Bank and each of their respective Affiliates is hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to set off and otherwise apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other indebtedness at any time owing by such Agent, such Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank, such Bank or such Affiliate to or for the credit or the account of any Borrower against any and all of the obligations of such Borrower now or hereafter existing under the Loan Documents, irrespective of whether such Agent, such Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank or such Bank shall have made any demand under this Agreement and although such obligations may be unmatured. Each Agent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank and each Bank agrees promptly to notify each Borrower after any such set‑off and application; provided , however , that the failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of such set‑off and application. The rights of each Agent, each Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank and each Bank and their respective Affiliates under this Section 10.05 are in addition to other rights and remedies (including other rights of set‑off) that such Persons may have.
10.06      Binding Effect . This Agreement shall become effective when it shall have been executed by each Borrower, each Issuing Bank, the L/C Agent, the Swingline Bank and each Agent and the Administrative Agent shall have been notified by each Initial Bank that such Initial Bank has executed it and thereafter shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each Borrower, each Agent, each Issuing Bank, the L/C Agent, the Swingline Bank and each Bank and their respective successors and assigns, except that no Borrower shall have the right to assign its rights hereunder or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the Banks.
10.07      Assignments and Participations .
(h)      Subject to Section 10.07(j) , each Bank may, and so long as no Default shall have occurred and be continuing, if demanded by any Borrower (following a demand by such Bank

97    



pursuant to Section 2.18 ) upon at least five Business Days’ notice to such Bank and the Administrative Agent, will, assign to one or more Eligible Assignees all or a portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment or Swingline Commitment, and the Loans and Reimbursement Obligations owing to it); provided , however , that (i) each such assignment shall be of a uniform, and not a varying, percentage of all rights and obligations of such Bank hereunder, (ii) except in the case of an assignment to a Person that, immediately prior to such assignment, was (x) a Bank or an Affiliate of any Bank, the aggregate amount of the Commitments being assigned to such Eligible Assignee pursuant to such assignment (determined as of the date of the Assignment and Acceptance with respect to such assignment) shall in no event be less than $1,000,000 unless it is an assignment of the entire amount of such assignor’s Commitment or (y) not a Bank or an Affiliate of any Bank, the aggregate amount of the Commitments being assigned to such Eligible Assignee pursuant to such assignment (determined as of the date of the Assignment and Acceptance with respect to such assignment) shall in no event be less than $5,000,000 unless it is an assignment of the entire amount of such assignor’s Commitment, (iii) each such assignment shall be to an Eligible Assignee, (iv) each assignment made as a result of a demand by any Borrower pursuant to Section 2.18 shall be arranged by such Borrower after consultation with the Administrative Agent and shall be either an assignment of all of the rights and obligations of the assigning Bank under this Agreement or an assignment of a portion of such rights and obligations made concurrently with another such assignment or other such assignments that together cover all of the rights and obligations of the assigning Bank under this Agreement, (v) no Bank shall be obligated to make any such assignment as a result of a demand by any Borrower pursuant to Section 2.18 unless and until such Bank shall have received one or more payments from either such Borrower or other Eligible Assignees in an aggregate amount at least equal to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Loans made by such Bank and Reimbursement Obligations owing to such Bank, together with accrued interest thereon to the date of payment of such principal amount and all other amounts payable to such Bank under this Agreement, (vi) as a result of such assignment, no Borrower shall be subject to additional amounts under Section 2.15 or 2.16 , (vii) the parties to each such assignment shall execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent, for its acceptance and recording in the Register, an Assignment and Acceptance, together with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500 and (viii) any assignment of the Swingline Commitment and Swingline Loans shall be for the entire amount of the Swingline Commitment and Swingline Loans.
(i)      Upon such execution, delivery, acceptance and recording, from and after the effective date specified in such Assignment and Acceptance, (i) the assignee thereunder shall be a party hereto and, to the extent that rights and obligations hereunder have been assigned to it pursuant to such Assignment and Acceptance, have the rights and obligations of a Bank, hereunder and (ii) the Bank assignor thereunder shall, to the extent that rights and obligations hereunder have been assigned by it pursuant to such Assignment and Acceptance, relinquish its rights (other than its rights under Sections 2.15 , 2.16 and 10.04 to the extent any claim thereunder relates to an event arising prior to such assignment and any other rights that are expressly provided hereunder to survive) and be released from its obligations under this Agreement (and, in the case of an Assignment and Acceptance covering all of the remaining

98    



portion of an assigning Bank’s rights and obligations under this Agreement, such Bank shall cease to be a party hereto).
(j)      By executing and delivering an Assignment and Acceptance, each Bank assignor thereunder and each assignee thereunder confirm to and agree with each other and the other parties thereto and hereto as follows: (i) other than as provided in such Assignment and Acceptance, such assigning Bank makes no representation or warranty and assumes no responsibility with respect to any statements, warranties or representations made in or in connection with any Loan Document or the execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of, or the perfection or priority of any lien or security interest created or purported to be created under or in connection with, any Loan Document or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant thereto; (ii) such assigning Bank makes no representation or warranty and assumes no responsibility with respect to the financial condition of any Borrower or the performance or observance by any Borrower of any of its obligations under any Loan Document or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant thereto; (iii) such assignee confirms that it has received a copy of this Agreement, together with copies of the financial statements referred to in Section 5.01 and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate to make its own credit analysis and decision to enter into such Assignment and Acceptance; (iv) such assignee will, independently and without reliance upon any Agent, such assigning Bank or any other Bank and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under this Agreement; (v) such assignee confirms that it is an Eligible Assignee; (vi) such assignee appoints and authorizes each Agent to take such action as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers and discretion under the Loan Documents as are delegated to such Agent by the terms hereof and thereof, together with such powers and discretion as are reasonably incidental thereto; and (vii) such assignee agrees that it will perform in accordance with their terms all of the obligations that by the terms of this Agreement are required to be performed by it as a Bank.
(k)      The Administrative Agent, acting for this purpose (but only for this purpose) as the agent of the Borrowers, shall maintain at its address referred to in Section 10.02 a copy of each Assignment and Acceptance delivered to and accepted by it and a register for the recordation of the names and addresses of the Banks and the Commitment of, and principal amount of the Loans and Reimbursement Obligations owing to, each Bank from time to time (the “ Register ”). The entries in the Register shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error, and the Borrowers, the Agents and the Banks shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Register as a Bank hereunder for all purposes of this Agreement. The Register shall be available for inspection by any Borrower or any Agent or any Bank at any reasonable time and from time to time upon reasonable prior notice.
(l)      Upon its receipt of an Assignment and Acceptance executed by an assigning Bank and an assignee, the Administrative Agent shall, if such Assignment and Acceptance has been completed and is in substantially the form of Exhibit C hereto, (i) accept such Assignment and Acceptance, (ii) record the information contained therein in the Register and (iii) give prompt notice thereof to the Parent and to the parties to such Assignment and Acceptance.

99    



(m)      In connection with any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Bank hereunder, no such assignment shall be effective unless and until, in addition to the other conditions thereto set forth herein, the parties to the assignment shall make such additional payments to the Administrative Agent in an aggregate amount sufficient, upon distribution thereof as appropriate (which may be outright payment, purchases by the assignee of participations or subparticipations, or other compensating actions, including funding, with the consent of the Borrowers and the Administrative Agent, the applicable pro rata share of Loans previously requested but not funded by the Defaulting Bank, to each of which the applicable assignee and assignor hereby irrevocably consent), to (x) pay and satisfy in full all payment liabilities then owed by such Defaulting Bank to the Administrative Agent or any Bank hereunder (and interest accrued thereon), and (y) acquire (and fund as appropriate) its full pro rata share of all Loans and participations in Letters of Credit and Swingline Loans in accordance with its Credit Exposure. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Bank hereunder shall become effective under applicable law without compliance with the provisions of this paragraph, then the assignee of such interest shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Bank for all purposes of this Agreement until such compliance occurs.
(n)      Subject to Section 10.07(j) , each Bank may sell participations to one or more Persons (other than any Borrower or any of its Affiliates) in or to all or a portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment, and the Loans and Reimbursement Obligations owing to it; provided , however , that (i) such Bank’s obligations under this Agreement (including its Commitment) shall remain unchanged, (ii) such Bank shall remain solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations, (iii) the Borrowers, the Agents, the Swingline Bank and the other Banks shall continue to deal solely and directly with such Bank in connection with such Bank’s rights and obligations under this Agreement, (iv) no participant under any such participation shall have any right to approve any amendment or waiver of any provision of any Loan Document, or any consent to any departure by any Borrower therefrom, except to the extent that such amendment, waiver or consent would reduce the principal of, or interest on, reimbursement obligations or any fees or other amounts payable hereunder, in each case to the extent subject to such participation, postpone any date fixed for any payment of principal of, or interest on, the reimbursement obligations or any fees or other amounts payable hereunder, in each case to the extent subject to such participation and (v) no further participation, sub-participation or other transfer by any participant of any rights or obligations thereunder may be made in violation of Section 10.07(j) . Each Bank shall, as non-fiduciary agent of the Borrowers solely for the purposes of this Section 10.07 , record in book entries in a register maintained by such Bank (the “ Participant Register ”), the name and amount of the participating interest of each Person entitled to receive payments in respect of any participating interests sold pursuant to this Section 10.07 . The entries in the Participant Register shall be conclusive absent manifest error, and such Bank shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Participant Register as the owner of such participation for all purposes of this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, the Administrative Agent (in its capacity as Administrative Agent) shall have no responsibility for maintaining a Participant Register.

100    



(o)      Any Bank may, in connection with any assignment or participation or proposed assignment or participation pursuant to this Section 10.07 , disclose to the assignee or participant or proposed assignee or participant any information relating to any Borrower furnished to such Bank by or on behalf of any Borrower; provided , however, that, prior to any such disclosure, the assignee or participant or proposed assignee or participant shall agree to preserve the confidentiality of any Confidential Information received by it from such Bank.
(p)      Any Bank may at any time create a security interest in all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement (including the Loans and Reimbursement Obligations owing to it) in favor of any Federal Reserve Bank in accordance with Regulation A of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other applicable central bank; provided that (x) no such creation of a security interest shall release such Bank from any of its obligations hereunder or substitute any such Federal Reserve Bank or similar central bank for such Bank as a party hereto and (y) any foreclosure or similar action by such Federal Reserve Bank or similar central bank shall be subject to the provisions of Section 10.07(j) .
(q)      Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 10.07 or any other provision of this Agreement:
(i)      Assignments. No Bank may assign all or any portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or any portion of its Commitment or Swingline Commitment or any Loans or Reimbursement Obligations owing to it) to any Person other than a Qualifying Bank, and any assignment by a Bank to a Non-Qualifying Bank shall be void. Prior to the effectiveness of any proposed assignment, the proposed assignee shall deliver to the assigning Bank, the Administrative Agent and the Parent (x) a certificate confirming that it is a Qualifying Bank and (y) if requested by the Parent, a copy of a ruling from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration to the effect that such assignee will be treated as a Qualifying Bank for purposes of Swiss Withholding Tax matters.
(ii)      Other Transfers . Except for assignments permitted by clause (i) above, no Bank or initial or subsequent Transferee (as defined below) shall enter into any participation, sub-participation or other arrangement (e.g. a credit default swap) (any of the foregoing, a “ Transfer ”) under which such Bank or other Person (any of the foregoing, a “ Transferor ”) Transfers any of its exposure under this Agreement to any other Person (a “ Transferee ”) unless (x) the Transferee is a Qualifying Bank and agrees in writing, for the benefit of the Borrowers, that it will not make any further Transfer in violation of this Section 10.07(j) or (y) under and throughout the life of such arrangement:
(A)      the relationship between the Bank and the Transferee is that of a debtor and creditor (including in the bankruptcy or similar event of the Bank or a Borrower);

101    



(B)      the Transferee will have no proprietary interest in the benefit of this Agreement or in any monies received by the Bank under or in relation to this Agreement; and
(C)      the Transferee will under no circumstances:
(1)      be subrogated to, or substituted in respect of, the Bank's claims under this Agreement; and
(2)      otherwise have any contractual relationship with, or rights against, the Borrower under or in relation to this Agreement.
(iii)      All Assignments and Other Transfers. If any Bank or other Transferor makes an assignment or Transfer in violation of this Section 10.07(j) , then (1) such Bank or Transferor shall reimburse and indemnify the Parent for all losses, liabilities, taxes, costs and expenses incurred by the Borrowers as a result thereof, including with respect to any amount paid by any Borrower to any other Bank as a result of such violation, and (2) the Parent shall not be required to make any increased payment to such Bank or Transferor or any assignee or Transferee thereof pursuant to Section 2.08(f) or Section 2.16 . The provisions of this Section 10.07(j) shall terminate and be of no further force or effect if the Loans, Reimbursement Obligations, all interest thereon and all other amounts payable under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents have become forthwith due and payable (at maturity, by acceleration or otherwise).
10.08      Counterparts; Integration . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Agreement by telecopier shall be effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Agreement. This Agreement and the other Loan Documents constitute the entire contract among the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersede any and all previous agreements and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof.
10.09      No Liability of the Issuing Banks . Each Borrower assumes all risks of the acts or omissions of any beneficiary or transferee of any Letter of Credit with respect to its use of such Letter of Credit. Neither an Issuing Bank nor any of its officers, directors, employees or agents shall be liable or responsible for: (a) the use that may be made of any Letter of Credit or any acts or omissions of any beneficiary or transferee in connection therewith; (b) the validity, sufficiency or genuineness of documents, or of any endorsement thereon, even if such documents should prove to be in any or all respects invalid, insufficient, fraudulent or forged; (c) payment by such Issuing Bank against presentation of documents that do not strictly comply with the terms of a Letter of Credit, including failure of any documents to bear any reference or adequate reference to the Letter of Credit; or (d) any other circumstances whatsoever in making or failing to make payment under any Letter of Credit, except that such Borrower shall have a claim against such Issuing Bank, and such Issuing Bank shall be liable to such Borrower, to the extent of any direct,

102    



but not consequential, damages suffered by such Borrower that such Borrower proves were caused by (i)  such Issuing Bank’s willful misconduct or gross negligence as determined in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction in determining whether documents presented under any Letter of Credit comply with the terms of the Letter of Credit or (ii) such Issuing Bank’s willful failure to make lawful payment under a Letter of Credit after the presentation to it of a draft and certificates strictly complying with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit. In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, the Issuing Banks may accept documents that appear on their face to be in order, without responsibility for further investigation, regardless of any notice or information to the contrary.
10.10      Confidentiality . Neither any Agent nor any Bank shall disclose any Confidential Information to any Person without the consent of the Parent, other than (a) to such Agent’s or such Bank’s Affiliates and their officers, directors, employees, agents and advisors, to actual or prospective Eligible Assignees and participants, and to any direct, indirect, actual or prospective counterparty (and its advisor) to any swap, derivative or securitization transaction related to the obligations under this Agreement, and in each case then only on a confidential basis, (b) as required by any law, rule or regulation or judicial process, (c) as requested or required by any state, federal or foreign authority or examiner regulating such Bank or pursuant to any request of any self-regulatory body having or claiming authority to regulate or oversee any aspect of a Bank’s business of that of any of its Affiliates and (d) to any rating agency when required by it, provided that, prior to any such disclosure, such rating agency shall undertake to preserve the confidentiality of any Confidential Information relating to the Borrowers received by it from such Bank. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the information subject to this Section 10.10 shall not include, and the Administrative Agent and each Bank may disclose to any and all Persons, without limitation of any kind, any information with respect to the “tax treatment” and “tax structure” (in each case, within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.6011-4) of the transactions contemplated hereby or by any of the other Loan Documents and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided to the Administrative Agent or such Bank relating to such tax treatment and tax structure (it being understood that this authorization is retroactively effective to the commencement of the first discussions between or among any of the parties regarding the transactions contemplated hereby or by any of the other Loan Documents); provided that with respect to any document or similar item that in either case contains information concerning such tax treatment or tax structure as well as other information, this sentence shall only apply to such portions of the document or similar item that relate to such tax treatment or tax structure.
10.11      Jurisdiction, Etc .
(e)      Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of any New York State court or federal court of the United States sitting in the Borough of Manhattan in New York City, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents to which it is a party, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding may be heard

103    



and determined in any such New York State court or, to the extent permitted by law, in such federal court. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Agreement shall affect any right that any party may otherwise have to bring any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents in the courts of any jurisdiction.
(f)      Each of the parties hereto irrevocably and unconditionally waives, to the fullest extent it may legally and effectively do so, any objection that it may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents to which it is a party in any New York State or federal court. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such action or proceeding in any such court sitting in the Borough of Manhattan in New York City.
(g)      Each of the Borrowers hereby irrevocably appoints Mayer Brown LLP, with offices on the Effective Date at 1675 Broadway, New York, New York, 10019, USA as its agent to receive, accept and acknowledge for and on its behalf services of any and all legal process, summons, notices and documents which may be served in any such action or proceeding. If for any reason such agent shall cease to be available to act as such, the Borrowers agree to promptly designate a new agent satisfactory to the Administrative Agent in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, to receive, accept and acknowledge for and on its behalf service of any and all legal process, summons, notices and documents which may be served in any such action or proceeding pursuant to the terms of this Section 10.11 . In the event that any Borrower shall fail to designate such new agent, service of process in any such action or proceeding may be made on such Borrower by the mailing of copies thereof by express or overnight mail or courier, postage prepaid, to such Borrower at its address set forth opposite its signature below.
10.12      Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York.
10.13      WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL . EACH OF THE BORROWERS, THE AGENTS AND THE BANKS IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO ANY OF THE LOAN DOCUMENTS, THE LOANS, THE LETTERS OF CREDIT, OR THE ACTIONS OF ANY AGENT OR ANY BANK IN THE NEGOTIATION, ADMINISTRATION, PERFORMANCE OR ENFORCEMENT THEREOF.
10.14      Disclosure of Information . Each Borrower agrees and consents to the Administrative Agent’s disclosure of information relating to this transaction to Gold Sheets and other similar bank trade publications. Such information will consist of deal terms and other information customarily found in such publications. The Parent shall have the right to review and approve any such disclosure made by the Administrative Agent before such disclosure is made (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld).

104    



10.15      Judgment Currency . If, for the purposes of obtaining judgment in any court, it is necessary to convert a sum due hereunder or under any other Loan Document in one currency into another currency, the rate of exchange used shall be that at which, in accordance with its normal banking procedures, the Administrative Agent could purchase the first currency with such other currency on the Business Day preceding that on which final judgment is given. The obligation of any Borrower in respect of any such sum due from it to the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Bank hereunder shall, notwithstanding any judgment in a currency (the “ Judgment Currency ”) other than that in which such sum is denominated in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement (the “ Agreement Currency ”), be discharged only to the extent that on the Business Day following receipt by the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Bank of any sum adjudged to be so due in the Judgment Currency, the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Bank may in accordance with normal banking procedures purchase the Agreement Currency with the Judgment Currency. If the amount of the Agreement Currency so purchased is less than the sum originally due to the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Bank in the Agreement Currency, the applicable Borrower agrees, as a separate obligation and notwithstanding any such judgment, to indemnify the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Bank, as applicable, against such loss. If the amount of the Agreement Currency so purchased is greater than the sum originally due to the Administrative Agent, such Issuing Bank or such Bank in such currency, the Administrative Agent, each Issuing Bank and each Bank agrees to return the amount of any excess to the applicable Borrower (or to any other Person who may be entitled thereto under applicable law).
10.16      Certain Swiss Withholding Tax Matters .
(a)      If the Ten Non-Bank Rule, the Twenty Non-Bank Rule or any other law, rule or guideline regarding Swiss Withholding Tax is amended in any material respect after the date of this Agreement, then the Parent or the Administrative Agent may (and, upon request of the Required Banks, the Administrative Agent shall), by written notice to the other, request that this Agreement be amended to reflect such change. Promptly after any such request, the Parent and the Administrative Agent shall enter into discussions regarding an amendment hereto that will place the parties hereto in substantially the same position (or in a different position acceptable to the Parent and the Required Banks) from a Swiss Withholding Tax perspective as they would have been in if the change had not happened. Without limiting the foregoing, (i) the Parent agrees that it will promptly agree to any amendment requested by the Administrative Agent or the Required Banks that would ease the restrictions set forth in Section 10.07(j) if such amendment would not result in any greater risk that Swiss Withholding Tax would be applicable to any payment under this Agreement; and (ii) the Banks and the Administrative Agent agree that they will promptly agree to any amendment requested by the Parent that would change the restrictions set forth in Section 10.07(j) if such amendment is necessary to avoid the risk that Swiss Withholding Tax would be applicable to any payment under this Agreement and is not unduly burdensome to the Banks.
(b)      Each Bank agrees that it will, and will cause any Person to which it sells any participation to, promptly notify the Parent and the Administrative Agent if for any reason it ceases to be a Qualifying Bank. Without limiting the foregoing, if at any time the Parent

105    



reasonably believes that any Bank’s status for Swiss Withholding Tax purposes has changed, then the Parent may request that such Bank (and each Bank agrees that under such circumstances it will) promptly confirm whether it is a Qualifying Bank or a Non-Qualifying Bank.
10.17      USA Patriot Act Notice . Each Bank that is subject to the Patriot Act and the Administrative Agent (for itself and not on behalf of any Bank) hereby notifies the Borrowers that pursuant to the requirements of the Patriot Act, it is required to obtain, verify and record information that identifies the Borrowers, which information includes the name and address of the Borrowers and other information that will allow such Bank or the Administrative Agent, as applicable, to identify the Borrowers in accordance with the Patriot Act.
10.18      Termination of Existing Agreements . The Borrowers and each applicable Bank agree that concurrently with the effectiveness of this Agreement and subject to Section 3.03 with respect to Existing Letters of Credit, the commitments under each of the Existing Credit Agreement and the Existing Reimbursement Agreement shall automatically reduce to zero and each of the Existing Credit Agreement and the Existing Reimbursement Agreement shall terminate, without any notice or other action of any kind and notwithstanding any notice or other requirement contained in the Existing Credit Agreement or the Existing Reimbursement Agreement, as applicable; provided that (a) the applicable Borrowers shall have paid all amounts then payable under the Existing Credit Agreement and the Existing Reimbursement Agreement; and (b) any provision of the Existing Credit Agreement or the Existing Reimbursement Agreement, as applicable, that by its terms survives termination thereof shall continue in full force and effect.
10.19      No Fiduciary Duty . Each Borrower agrees that in connection with all aspects of the Loans and Letters of Credit contemplated by this Agreement and any communications in connection therewith, such Borrower and its Affiliates, on the one hand, and the Agents, the Banks and their Related Parties, on the other hand, will have a business relationship that does not create, by implication or otherwise, any fiduciary duty on the part of the Agents, the Banks or their Related Parties, and no such duty will be deemed to have arisen in connection with any such transactions or communications.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]


106    



IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.
ACE LIMITED

    
Authorized Officer
    
Authorized Officer
ACE BERMUDA INSURANCE LTD.
The Common Seal of ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd. was hereunto affixed in the presence of:
    
Authorized Officer
    
Authorized Officer
ACE TEMPEST LIFE REINSURANCE LTD.
The Common Seal of ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd. was hereunto affixed in the presence of:
    
Authorized Officer
    
Authorized Officer
(signatures continued)

Signature Page to Credit Agreement






ACE TEMPEST REINSURANCE LTD.
The Common Seal of ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd. was hereunto affixed in the presence of:
    
Authorized Officer
    
Authorized Officer
ACE INA HOLDINGS INC.

    
Authorized Officer
    
Authorized Officer

(signatures continued)

Signature Page to Credit Agreement





WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , as Administrative Agent, as an Issuing Bank, the Swingline Bank and as a Bank
By:         
Title:         


Signature Page to Credit Agreement




SCHEDULE I
COMMITMENT AMOUNTS

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

$100,000,000

Citibank, N.A.

$100,000,000

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

$100,000,000

Barclays Bank PLC

$75,000,000

HSBC Bank USA, National Association

$75,000,000

Lloyds TSB Bank plc

$75,000,000

The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.

$75,000,000

Bank of America, N.A.

$75,000,000

Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited

$50,000,000

ING Bank N.V., London Branch

$50,000,000

State Street Bank and Trust Company

$50,000,000

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc

$50,000,000

Goldman Sachs Bank USA

$25,000,000

Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A.

$25,000,000

Royal Bank of Canada

$25,000,000

Standard Chartered Bank

$25,000,000

The Bank of New York Mellon

$25,000,000

TOTAL

$1,000,000,000










SCHEDULE II
EXISTING LETTERS OF CREDIT
Letters of Credit Issued by Wells Fargo :
[Intentionally Omitted]

Letters of Credit Issued by Citibank :
[Intentionally Omitted]






SCHEDULE 6.02(A)
LIENS

None.





EXHIBIT A-1

FORM OF REVOLVING NOTE

____________, 20__



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, [NAME OF BORROWER] , a ________________ (the “ Borrower ”), hereby promises to pay to ______________________________ (the “ Bank ”), at the offices of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “ Administrative Agent ”) located at One Wells Fargo Center, 301 South College Street, Charlotte, North Carolina (or at such other place or places as the Administrative Agent may designate), at the times and in the manner provided in the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2012 (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among the Borrower, [ACE Limited, ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., ACE INA Holdings Inc.], the lenders from time to time parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, the aggregate unpaid amount of all Revolving Loans made by the Bank to the Borrower under the Credit Agreement. The defined terms in the Credit Agreement are used herein with the same meaning.
The Borrower further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Revolving Loan from the date of such Revolving Loan until such Revolving Loan is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement. Payments of both principal and interest shall be made in Dollars.

This Revolving Note is one of the Revolving Notes referred to in the Credit Agreement. Reference is made to the Credit Agreement for a statement of the terms and provisions under which this Revolving Note may be required to be prepaid or this Revolving Note may be accelerated.

This Revolving Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York. The Borrower irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of any New York State court or federal court of the United States sitting in the Borough of Manhattan in New York City, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Revolving Note.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]





IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Borrower has caused this Revolving Note to be executed by its duly authorized corporate officer as of the day and year first above written.


[NAME OF BORROWER]


By:      ________________________________
Name:      ________________________________
Title:      ________________________________






EXHIBIT A-2

FORM OF SWINGLINE NOTE

`____________, 20__



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, [NAME OF BORROWER] , a _______________ corporation (the “ Borrower ”), hereby promises to pay to WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (the “ Swingline Bank ”), at the offices of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “ Administrative Agent ”) located at One Wells Fargo Center, 301 South College Street, Charlotte, North Carolina (or at such other place or places as the Administrative Agent may designate), at the times and in the manner provided in the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2012 (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among the Borrower, [ACE Limited, ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., ACE INA Holdings Inc.], the lenders from time to time parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, the aggregate unpaid amount of all Swingline Loans made by the Swingline Bank to the Borrower under the Credit Agreement. The defined terms in the Credit Agreement are used herein with the same meaning.
The Borrower further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Swingline Loan from the date of such Swingline Loan until such Swingline Loan is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement. Payments of both principal and interest shall be made in Dollars.

This Swingline Note is one of the Swingline Notes referred to in the Credit Agreement. Reference is made to the Credit Agreement for a statement of the terms and provisions under which this Swingline Note may be required to be prepaid or this Swingline Note may be accelerated.

This Swingline Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York. The Borrower irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of any New York State court or federal court of the United States sitting in the Borough of Manhattan in New York City, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Swingline Note.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]






IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Borrower has caused this Swingline Note to be executed by its duly authorized corporate officer as of the day and year first above written.


[NAME OF BORROWER]


By:      ________________________________
Name:      ________________________________
Title:      ________________________________






EXHIBIT B-1
NOTICE OF BORROWING
[Date]
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Administrative Agent
1525 West W.T. Harris Blvd
Mailcode D1109-019
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Attention: Syndication Agency Services
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, [NAME OF BORROWER] (the “ Borrower ”), refers to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2012, among the Borrower, [ACE Limited, ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., ACE INA Holdings Inc.], certain lenders from time to time parties thereto, and you, as Administrative Agent for the Banks (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), and, pursuant to Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement, hereby gives you, as Administrative Agent, irrevocable notice that the Borrower requests a Borrowing of Revolving Loans under the Credit Agreement, and to that end sets forth below the information relating to such Borrowing (the “ Proposed Borrowing ”) as required by Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement:
(i) The aggregate principal amount of the Proposed Borrowing is $_______________. To be in a principal amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000 (or if less, the amount of the aggregate Unused Commitments).
(ii) The Loans comprising the Proposed Borrowing shall be initially made as [Base Rate Loans] [LIBOR Loans]. Select the applicable Type of Loans.
(iii) [The initial Interest Period for the LIBOR Loans comprising the Proposed Borrowing shall be [one/two/three/six/nine/twelve months].] Include this clause in the case of a Proposed Borrowing comprised of LIBOR Loans, and select the applicable Interest Period (one, two , three, six, nine or twelve months). Note that Interest Periods of nine or twelve months are available only if acceptable to all Banks.
(iv) The Proposed Borrowing is requested to be made on __________________ (the “ Borrowing Date ”). Shall be a Business Day (i) which may be the date hereof, if notice is delivered to the Administrative Agent no later than 10:00 a.m. on the date hereof (in the case of Base Rate Loans), or (ii) at least three Business Days after the date hereof (in the case of LIBOR Loans).






The Borrower hereby certifies that the following statements are true on and as of the date hereof and will be true on and as of the Borrowing Date:

A. Each of the representations and warranties contained in Article V of the Credit Agreement (other than the representations and warranties contained in Section 5.01(f)(i) and Section 5.01(g) of the Credit Agreement) Include parenthetical unless the Proposed Borrowing is to occur on the Effective Date. and in the other Loan Documents is and will be true and correct on and as of each such date, with the same effect as if made on and as of each such date, both immediately before and after giving effect to the Proposed Borrowing and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, except to the extent any such representation or warranty is expressly stated to have been made as of a specific date, in which case such representation or warranty shall be true and correct as of such date;
B. No Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from the Proposed Borrowing or from the application of the proceeds therefrom; and
C. After giving effect to the Proposed Borrowing, (i) the aggregate Credit Exposure will not exceed the aggregate Commitments and (ii) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Loans will not exceed the Revolver Sublimit.
Very truly yours,
[NAME OF BORROWER]
By:      _________________________________
Name:      _________________________________
Title:      _________________________________






EXHIBIT B-2
NOTICE OF SWINGLINE BORROWING
[Date]
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Administrative Agent
1525 West W.T. Harris Blvd
Mailcode D1109-019
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Attention: Syndication Agency Services
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Swingline Bank
One Wells Fargo Center, 15 th Floor
301 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288
Attention: Karen Hanke
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, [NAME OF BORROWER] (the “ Borrower ”), refers to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2012, among the Borrower, [ACE Limited, ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., ACE INA Holdings Inc.], certain lenders from time to time parties thereto, and you, as Administrative Agent for the Banks (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), and, pursuant to Section 2.02(c) of the Credit Agreement, hereby gives you, as Administrative Agent and as Swingline Bank, irrevocable notice that the Borrower requests a Borrowing of a Swingline Loan under the Credit Agreement, and to that end sets forth below the information relating to such Borrowing (the “ Proposed Borrowing ”) as required by Section 2.02(c) of the Credit Agreement:
(i) The principal amount of the Proposed Borrowing is $_______________. To be in a principal amount of $5,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $500,000 (or if less, the amount of the aggregate Unused Swingline Commitment).
(ii) The Proposed Borrowing is requested to be made on __________________ (the “ Borrowing Date ”). Notice must be received by 1:00 p.m. EST on the date of the Proposed Borrowing.
The Borrower hereby certifies that the following statements are true on and as of the date hereof and will be true on and as of the Borrowing Date:





A. Each of the representations and warranties contained in Article V of the Credit Agreement (other than the representations and warranties contained in Section 5.01(f)(i) and the last sentence of Section 5.01(g) of the Credit Agreement) Include parenthetical unless the Proposed Borrowing is to occur on the Effective Date. and in the other Loan Documents is and will be true and correct on and as of each such date, with the same effect as if made on and as of each such date, both immediately before and after giving effect to the Proposed Borrowing and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, except to the extent any such representation or warranty is expressly stated to have been made as of a specific date, in which case such representation or warranty shall be true and correct as of such date;
B. No Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from the Proposed Borrowing or from the application of the proceeds therefrom; and
C. After giving effect to the Proposed Borrowing, (i) the aggregate Credit Exposure will not exceed the aggregate Commitments, (ii) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Loans will not exceed the Revolver Sublimit and (iii) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Swingline Loans will not exceed the Swingline Commitment.
Very truly yours,
[NAME OF BORROWER]
By:      _________________________________
Name:      _________________________________
Title:      _________________________________







EXHIBIT B-3
NOTICE OF CONVERSION/CONTINUATION
[Date]
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Administrative Agent
1525 West W.T. Harris Blvd
Mailcode D1109-019
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Attention: Syndication Agency Services
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, [NAME OF BORROWER] (the “ Borrower ”), refers to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2012, among the Borrower, [ACE Limited, ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., ACE INA Holdings Inc.], certain lenders from time to time parties thereto, and you, as Administrative Agent for the Banks (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), and, pursuant to Section 2.10(b) of the Credit Agreement, hereby gives you, as Administrative Agent, irrevocable notice that the Borrower requests a [conversion] [continuation] Insert “conversion” or “continuation” throughout the notice, as applicable. of Revolving Loans under the Credit Agreement, and to that end sets forth below the information relating to such [conversion] [continuation] (the “ Proposed [Conversion] [Continuation] ”) as required by Section 2.10(b) of the Credit Agreement:
(i) The Proposed [Conversion] [Continuation] is requested to be made on _______________. Shall be a Business Day at least one Business Day after the date hereof (in the case of any conversion of LIBOR Loans into Base Rate Loans) or at least three Business Days after the date hereof (in the case of any conversion of Base Rate Loans into, or continuation of, LIBOR Loans), and additionally, in the case of any conversion of LIBOR Loans into Base Rate Loans, or continuation of LIBOR Loans, shall be the last day of the Interest Period applicable to such LIBOR Loans.
(ii) The Proposed [Conversion] [Continuation] involves $____________ After giving effect to any conversion or continuation, each Borrowing of LIBOR Loans shall be in a principal amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000 and the aggregate principal amount of all Base Rate Loans shall be in a principal amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000. in aggregate principal amount of Revolving Loans made pursuant to a Borrowing on ________________, Insert the applicable Borrowing Date for the Revolving Loans being converted or continued. which





Revolving Loans are presently maintained as [Base Rate] [LIBOR] Loans and are proposed hereby to be [converted into Base Rate Loans] [converted into LIBOR Loans] [continued as LIBOR Loans]. Complete with the applicable bracketed language.
(iii) [The Interest Period for the Revolving Loans being [converted into] [continued as] LIBOR Loans pursuant to the Proposed [Conversion] [Continuation] shall be [one/two/three/six/nine/twelve months].] Include this clause in the case of a Proposed Conversion or Continuation involving a conversion of Base Rate Loans into, or continuation of, LIBOR Loans, and select the applicable Interest Period. Interest Periods of nine or twelve months are available only if acceptable to all Banks.
The Borrower hereby certifies that the following statement is true both on and as of the date hereof and on and as of the effective date of the Proposed [Conversion] [Continuation]: no Default has or will have occurred and is continuing or would result from the Proposed [Conversion] [Continuation].
Very truly yours,
[NAME OF BORROWER]
By:      _________________________________
Name:      _________________________________
Title:      _________________________________






EXHIBIT C

ASSIGNMENT AND ACCEPTANCE
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ACCEPTANCE (this “ Assignment and Acceptance ”) is dated as of the Effective Date set forth below and is entered into by and between [ Insert name of Assignor ] (the “ Assignor ”) and [ Insert name of Assignee ] (the “ Assignee ”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement identified below, receipt of a copy of which is hereby acknowledged by the Assignee. The Standard Terms and Conditions set forth in Annex 1 attached hereto (the “ Standard Terms and Conditions ”) are hereby agreed to and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Assignment and Acceptance as if set forth herein in full.
For an agreed consideration, the Assignor hereby irrevocably sells and assigns to the Assignee, and the Assignee hereby irrevocably purchases and assumes from the Assignor, subject to and in accordance with the Standard Terms and Conditions and the Credit Agreement, as of the Effective Date inserted by the Administrative Agent as contemplated below (i) all of the Assignor's rights and obligations in its capacity as a Bank under the Credit Agreement and any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto to the extent related to the amount and percentage interest identified below of all of such outstanding rights and obligations of the Assignor under the respective facilities identified below (including any Letters of Credit and guarantees included in such facilities) and (ii) to the extent permitted to be assigned under applicable law, all claims, suits, causes of action and any other right of the Assignor (in its capacity as a Bank) against any Person, whether known or unknown, arising under or in connection with the Credit Agreement, any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto or the loan transactions governed thereby or in any way based on or related to any of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, contract claims, tort claims, malpractice claims, statutory claims and all other claims at law or in equity related to the rights and obligations sold and assigned pursuant to clause (i) above (the rights and obligations sold and assigned pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) above being referred to herein collectively as the “ Assigned Interest ”). Such sale and assignment is without recourse to the Assignor and, except as expressly provided in this Assignment and Acceptance, without representation or warranty by the Assignor.
1.      Assignor:          ______________________________

Assignor [is] [is not] a Defaulting Bank.

2.      Assignee:          ______________________________
[and is an Affiliate of [ identify Bank ]]

3.      Borrowers:          ACE Limited, ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., ACE INA Holdings Inc.

4.      Administrative Agent:      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement.






5.      Credit Agreement:      Credit Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2012 (as amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among the Borrowers, certain lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “ Banks ”), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.

6.      Assigned Interest:

Facility Assigned
Aggregate Amount of Commitment/Loans/Letter of Credit Exposure for all Banks
Amount of Commitment/Loans Assigned/Letters of Credit Exposure Assigned Amount to be adjusted by the counterparties to take into account any payments or prepayments made between the Trade Date and the Effective Date.
Percentage Assigned of Commitment/Loans/Letter of Credit Exposure Set forth, to at least 9 decimals, as a percentage of the Commitment/Loans/Letter of Credit Exposure of all Banks thereunder.
Senior
Unsecured
Revolving Credit Facility
$
$
%

[7.      Trade Date:          ______________] To be completed if the Assignor and the Assignee intend that the minimum assignment amount is to be determined as of the Trade Date.


8.      Effective Date:      ______________ [TO BE INSERTED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND WHICH SHALL BE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF RECORDATION OF TRANSFER IN THE REGISTER THEREFOR.]
The terms set forth in this Assignment and Acceptance are hereby agreed to:
ASSIGNOR :

[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]


By:      _________________________________

Title:      _________________________________

ASSIGNEE :

[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]


By:      _________________________________






Title:      _________________________________

[Consented to and] To be added only if the consent of the Administrative Agent and Swingline Bank is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement. Accepted:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ,
as Administrative Agent and Swingline Bank
By:      _________________________________
Title:      _________________________________

[Consented to:] To be added only if the consent of the Parent and/or other parties (e.g. Fronting Bank) is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.
 

[NAME OF RELEVANT PARTY]


By:      _________________________________

Title:      _________________________________
ANNEX 1 to Assignment and Acceptance


Credit Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2012, among ACE Limited, ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd., ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd., ACE INA Holdings Inc. (collectively, the “ Borrowers ”), certain Banks from time to time parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR
ASSIGNMENT AND ACCEPTANCE

1.      Representations and Warranties .

1.1      Assignor . The Assignor (a) represents and warrants that (i) it is the legal and beneficial owner of the Assigned Interest, (ii) the Assigned Interest is free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or other adverse claim, (iii) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Acceptance and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and (iv) it is [not] a Defaulting Bank; and (b) assumes no responsibility with respect to (i) any statements, warranties or representations made in or in connection with the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, (ii) the execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of the Loan Documents or any collateral thereunder, (iii) the financial condition of the Borrowers, any of their Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person obligated in respect of any Loan Document or (iv) the performance





or observance by the Borrowers, any of their Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person of any of their respective obligations under any Loan Document.

1.2.      Assignee . The Assignee (a) represents and warrants that (i) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Acceptance and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to become a Bank under the Credit Agreement, (ii) it meets all requirements of an Eligible Assignee under the Credit Agreement (subject to receipt of such consents as may be required under the Credit Agreement), (iii) from and after the Effective Date, it shall be bound by the provisions of the Credit Agreement as a Bank thereunder and, to the extent of the Assigned Interest, shall have the obligations of a Bank thereunder, (iv) it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement, together with copies of the most recent financial statements delivered pursuant to Sections 6.03(b) and 6.03(c) thereof, as applicable, and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate to make its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Acceptance and to purchase the Assigned Interest on the basis of which it has made such analysis and decision independently and without reliance on the Administrative Agent or any other Bank, and (v) if it is a Bank organized under the laws of a jurisdiction outside the United States, attached to the Assignment and Acceptance is any documentation required to be delivered by it pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, duly completed and executed by the Assignee; and (b) agrees that (i) it will, independently and without reliance on the Administrative Agent, the Assignor or any other Bank, and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under the Loan Documents, and (ii) it will perform in accordance with their terms all of the obligations that by the terms of the Loan Documents are required to be performed by it as a Bank.

The Assignee represents to the Administrative Agent, the Parent and the Banks, on the Effective Date, that (x) it is [not] a Qualifying Bank for purposes of Swiss Withholding Tax and (y) [such Assignee is not a Non-NAIC Bank][such Assignee is a Non-NAIC Bank and [_________] has agreed to act as a Non-NAIC Fronting Bank on behalf of such Assignee with respect to Syndicated Letters of Credit].
 
2.      Payments . From and after the Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of the Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to the Assignor for amounts that have accrued to but excluding the Effective Date and to the Assignee for amounts that have accrued on and after the Effective Date.

3.      General Provisions . This Assignment and Acceptance shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Assignment and Acceptance may be executed in any number of counterparts, which together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Assignment and Acceptance by telecopy shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Assignment and Acceptance. This Assignment and Acceptance shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.






EXHIBIT D
FORM OF SYNDICATED LETTER OF CREDIT


Issue Date     
Clean, Irrevocable Unconditional Letter of Credit No.:     
To Beneficiary:(Name)     
(Address)     
Dear Sir or Madam:
The banks and financial institutions set forth in Schedule 1 to this Syndicated Letter of Credit (the “ Banks ”) have established through Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, acting as the letter of credit agent (in such capacity, the “ L/C Agent ” and attorney-in-fact for the Banks), this clean, irrevocable, and unconditional (except as expressly otherwise stated herein) letter of credit (this “ Letter of Credit ”) in your favor as beneficiary (the “ Beneficiary ”) at the request and for the account of [ ACE Limited ][ ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd. ][ ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd. ][ ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd. ][ ACE INA Holdings, Inc. ] (the “ Account Party ”) for drawings up to [ U.S. $____________ ][ €____________ ][ £____________ ] [ ¥ ___________ ][ Canadian $____________ ] effective immediately and expiring at the L/C Agent's address at Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, 401 Linden Street, First Floor, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27101, Attention: International Operations, Standby Letters of Credit, NC 6034 (or any other office which may be designated by the L/C Agent by written notice delivered to you) no later than 5:00 p.m., Charlotte, North Carolina time, on __________________ (the “ Expiration Date [ , as such date may be extended as set forth below ] Insert if Account Party requests automatic renewal. ).
The Banks severally undertake to promptly honor your sight draft(s) drawn on us, duly endorsed on the reverse side thereof by the Beneficiary expressly specifying the Letter of Credit No. ____________, for all or any part of this credit upon presentation of your draft drawn on us at the L/C Agent's office specified in the first paragraph hereof on a Business Day on or prior to the Expiration Date.
The term “Beneficiary” as used herein includes any successor by operation of law of the named Beneficiary including, without limitation, any liquidator, rehabilitator, receiver or conservator. The term “Business Day” means a day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or any other day on which banking institutions in Winston-Salem, North Carolina or the city in which the payment office of the L/C Agent is located are required by law to be closed.
Except as stated herein, this undertaking is not subject to any condition, requirement or qualification. The Banks' several obligations under this Letter of Credit shall be their individual obligations, and are in no way contingent upon reimbursement with respect thereto, or upon their





ability to perfect any lien or security interest. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full all obligations of the Banks.
Each of the Banks agrees, for itself alone and not jointly with any other Bank, to honor a draft drawn by you and presented to the L/C Agent in an amount not to exceed the aggregate amount available to be drawn hereunder multiplied by such Bank's percentage obligation as set forth on Schedule 1 to this Letter of Credit (the “ Percentage Obligations ”) and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. The obligations of the Banks hereunder shall be several and not joint, and multiple draws shall be available under this Letter of Credit. Upon the transfer by a Bank to the L/C Agent for your account of the amount specified in a draft drawn on such Bank hereunder, such Bank shall be fully discharged of its obligations under this Letter of Credit with respect to such draft, such Bank shall not be obligated thereafter to make any further payments under this Letter of Credit with respect to such draft, and the amount available to be drawn thereafter under this Letter of Credit shall be automatically and permanently reduced by an amount equal to the amount of such draft. The failure of any Bank to make funds available to the L/C Agent for payment under this Letter of Credit shall not relieve any other Bank of its obligation hereunder to make funds available to the L/C Agent. Neither the L/C Agent nor any Bank shall be responsible for the failure of any other Bank to honor its share of any drawings hereunder or to make funds available to the L/C Agent.
Except to the extent the amount of this Letter of Credit may be increased, this Letter of Credit cannot be modified or revoked without your written consent, provided that this Letter of Credit may be amended to delete a Bank or add a Bank or change Percentage Obligations so long as such amendment does not decrease the amount of this Letter of Credit, and need only be signed by the L/C Agent so long as any Bank added shall be approved by the Securities Valuation Office of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association has been appointed by the Banks, has been granted the authority by the Banks to act as, and has been irrevocably granted a power of attorney by the Banks to act as L/C Agent for the Banks obligated under this Letter of Credit. As L/C Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association has full power of attorney from such Banks to act on their behalf hereunder to (i) execute and deliver this Letter of Credit, (ii) receive drafts, other demands for payment and other documents presented by you hereunder, (iii) determine whether such drafts, demands and documents are in compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit, and (iv) notify the Banks and the Account Party that a valid drawing has been made and the date that the related payment under this Letter of Credit is to be made; provided , however , that the L/C Agent shall have no obligation or liability for any payment under this Letter of Credit (other than payment to you of such funds as have been made available to it by the Banks pursuant to your draw).
[ This Letter of Credit expires on the Expiration Date, but will automatically renew without amendment for one year from the Expiration Date or any future expiration date (as applicable, the “ New Expiration Date ”) unless at least [30] [60] [90] days prior to such Expiration Date or New Expiration Date, the L/C Agent notifies you by registered mail or courier delivery that this Letter of Credit will not renew; provided , however , that in no event (i) shall the





Letter of Credit renew after November 6, 2017 nor (ii) shall any renewal extend the New Expiration Date beyond November 6, 2018. ] Insert if Account Party requests automatic renewal.
Only the Beneficiary may make drawings under the Letter of Credit, and this Letter of Credit is not transferable.
[ This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (2007 Revision) International Chamber of Commerce publication No. 600 (the “ Uniform Customs ”) and to the extent not inconsistent therewith, the laws of the State of New York. Notwithstanding Article 36 of the Uniform Customs, in the event that one or more of the occurrences specified in Article 36 of the Uniform Customs occurs, then the Banks hereby specifically agree that this Letter of Credit shall be extended so as not to expire during such interruption of business and shall extend for ten days after such resumption of business. ] Insert UCP 600 if required by an insurance regulator, otherwise ISP 98 should be used.

[ This Letter of Credit is subject to and governed by the laws of the State of New York, and the International Standby Practices 98 (ISP98) (International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 590). In the event of any conflict, the laws of the State of New York will control. ] Insert UCP 600 if required by an insurance regulator, otherwise ISP 98 should be used.


__________________________        __________________________            
Signature                  Title


Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as L/C Agent and attorney-in fact for
the Banks set forth in Schedule 1
to this Syndicated Letter of Credit






SCHEDULE 1


BANK
PERCENTAGE OBLIGATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Exhibit 12.1
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Share Dividends
(in millions of U.S. dollars except ratios)

 
Years Ended December 31
 
 
2012

 
2011

 
2010

 
2009

 
2008

Earnings per Financial Statements
$
2,706

 
$
1,540

 
$
3,085

 
$
2,523

 
$
1,182

Add:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for income taxes
270

 
502

 
553

 
521

 
367

Fixed charges
287

 
288

 
251

 
253

 
256

Earnings for Computation
$
3,263

 
$
2,330

 
$
3,889

 
$
3,297

 
$
1,805

Fixed Charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
$
250

 
$
250

 
$
224

 
$
225

 
$
230

One third of payments under operating leases
37

 
38

 
27

 
28

 
26

Total Fixed Charges
$
287

 
$
288

 
$
251

 
$
253

 
$
256

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
11.4

 
8.1

 
15.5

 
13.0

 
7.1

Preferred Share Dividends
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
24

Total Fixed Charges and Preferred Share Dividends
$
287

 
$
288

 
$
251

 
$
253

 
$
280

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred Share Dividends
11.4

 
8.1

 
15.5

 
13.0

 
6.5


Note:
ACE recognizes accruals for interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense (i.e., excluded from interest expense).




Exhibit 21.1
  
Set forth below are subsidiaries of ACE and their respective jurisdiction of ownership and percentage ownership, in each case as of December 31, 2011. Each of the named subsidiaries is not necessarily a significant subsidiary as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, and ACE has several additional subsidiaries not named below. The unnamed subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary at the end of the year covered by this report.

Name

Jurisdiction of
Organization

Percentage
Ownership
ACE Limited
Switzerland
Publicly held
     ACE Insurance (Switzerland) Limited
Switzerland
100%
          ACE Reinsurance (Switzerland) Limited
Switzerland
100%
     ACE Group Management and Holdings Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
         ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                  Paget Reinsurance International Ltd.
                                                                   
Bermuda
100%
                  Paget Reinsurance Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                  ACE Capital Title Reinsurance Company
                 (EI# 06-1434264, NAIC# 50028, NY)
USA
(New York)
100%
                  ACE Financial Solutions International, Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                  ACE Bermuda International Insurance (Ireland) Limited
                  (formerly ACE European Markets Insurance Limited)
Ireland
100%
                  Corporate Officers & Directors Assurance Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                  Oasis Real Estate Company Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                  Sovereign Risk Insurance Limited
Bermuda
100%
                           Sovereign Risk Insurance (Dubai) Limited
UAE (Dubai)
100%
                  ACE Realty Holdings Limited
Bermuda
100%
                  Oasis Personnel Limited
Cayman Islands
100%
           ACE Global Markets Limited
England & Wales
100%
                       ACE Group Holdings Limited
England & Wales
100%
                            ACE Tarquin
England & Wales
100%
                                     ACE Capital V Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                     ACE Leadenhall Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                                ACE Underwriting Agencies Limited
England & Wales
100%
                       ACE London Group Limited
England & Wales
100%
                            ACE Capital Limited
England & Wales
100%
                            ACE Capital III Limited
England & Wales
100%
                            ACE Capital IV Limited
England & Wales
100%
                            ACE London Holdings Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                     ACE Capital II Limited
England & Wales
100%





                                     ACE London Investments Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                               ACE London Aviation Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                               ACE London Underwriting Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                               ACE Underwriting Services Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                     ACE London Services Limited
England & Wales
100%
                           ACE Capital VI Limited
England & Wales
100%
        ACE Services Limited
Cayman Islands
100%
                   ACE Holdings (Gibraltar) Limited
Gibraltar
100%
                           ACE Gibraltar Limited
Gibraltar
100%
         Oasis Insurance Services Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
        ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                  ACE Europe Life Limited
England & Wales
100%
                  ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                           ACE Tempest Re Escritório de Representação no Brasil Ltda.
Brazil
99.999999%
0.000001% (ACE Tempest Life Reinsurance Ltd.)
                           Oasis Investments Limited
Bermuda
67%
33% (ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd.)
                                 Oasis D1 LLC
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                         Oasis D2 LLC
USA (Delaware)
100%
                            Oasis Investments 2 Ltd.
Bermuda
67%
33% (ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd.)
    ACE Group Holdings, Inc.
        
USA (Delaware)
100%
                  ACE (CR) Holdings
England & Wales
100%
                           ACE Capital VII Limited
England & Wales
100%
                           ACE (RGB) Holdings Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                     ACE (CIDR) Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                      Ridge Underwriting Agencies Limited
England & Wales
100%
                  ACE Asset Management Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                  ACE Life Insurance Company
USA (Connecticut)
100%





                  ACE INA Holdings Inc.
USA (Delaware)
80%
20% (ACE Limited)
                           ACE Life Insurance Company Ltd.
Korea
100%
                           Combined Insurance Company of America
USA
(Illinois)
100%
                                     C.I.C.A. Superannuation Nominees Pty. Ltd.
Australia
100%
                                     Combined Insurance Company of Europe Limited
Ireland
100%
                                     Combined Insurance Company of New Zealand Limited
New Zealand
100%
                                     Combined International Services, Ltd.
United Kingdom
100%
                                     Combined Life Insurance Company of Australia
Australia
100%
                                     Combined Life Insurance Company of New York
USA
(New York)
100%
                                     Employee Benefit Communications, Inc.
USA
(Florida)
100%
                                    Superannuation Fund (CICNZ) Limited
New Zealand
100%
                                    VOL Properties Corporation
USA
(Delaware)
100%
                           Huatai Insurance Holding Company, Limited
China
5.91%
9.64% (ACE Tempest Reinsurance Ltd.)
4.45% (ACE US Holdings, Inc.)
                                   Huatai Life Insurance Company, Limited
China
79.4221%
20% (ACE INA Holdings Inc.)
                            INA Corporation
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                     INA Tax Benefits Reporting, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                     INA Financial Corporation
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                Brandywine Holdings Corporation
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                         Cravens, Dargan & Company, Pacific Coast
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                         Century Indemnity Company
                                                         (EI# 06-6105395, NAIC #20710, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                  Century International Reinsurance Company Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                                                 INA Holdings Corporation
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                          INA International Holdings, LLC
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                         ACE INA Properties, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                                  Conference Facilities, Inc.
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                         INA Reinsurance Company, Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                                                         ACE INA Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                         American Lenders Facilities, Inc.
USA (California)
100%





                                                         ESIS, Inc.
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                 ACE Environmental Health and Safety Consulting
                                                                  (Shanghai) Company Limited
China
100%
                                                                 ESIS Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
Singapore
100%
                                                                 Proclaim America, Inc.
USA (Texas)
51%
                                                         NewMarkets Insurance Agency, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                         ACE INA Excess and Surplus Insurance Services,
                                                         Inc.
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                         ACE INA Excess and Surplus Insurance Services,
                                                         Inc.
USA (California)
100%
                                                         ACE Financial Solutions, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                         ACE Risk Solutions, Inc.
USA
(New York)
100%
                                                         Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
                                                         (EI# 06-1016108, NAIC #43575, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                         ACE American Insurance Company
                                                         (EI# 95-2371728, NAIC# 22667, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                    Penn Millers Holding Corporation
USA
(Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                              PMMHC Corp.
USA
(Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                                         Penn Millers Insurance Company
USA
(Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                                                  American Millers Insurance
                                                                                                  Company
USA
(Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                                                  Penn Millers Agency, Inc.
USA
(Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                  Pacific Employers Insurance Company
                                                                  (EI# 95-1077060, NAIC# 22748, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                              Illinois Union Insurance Company
                                                                              (EI# 36-2759195, NAIC #27960, IL)
USA (Illinois)
100%
                                                                 Rain and Hail Insurance Service Incorporated
USA (Iowa)
100%
                                                                              Agri General Insurance Company
                                                                              (EI# 42-1204578, NAIC #42757, IA)
USA (Iowa)
100%
                                                                                         Rain and Hail L.L.C.
USA (Iowa)
100%
                                                                              Agri General Insurance Service, Inc.
USA (Iowa)
100%
                                                                              Rain and Hail Insurance Service International,
                                                                              Inc.
USA (Iowa)
100%
                                                                                         Rain and Hail Insurance Corporation
Canada
100%
                                                                                                  Rain and Hail Insurance Service,
                                                                                                  Ltd.
Canada
100%
                                                                                         Rain and Hail do Brasil, Ltda.
Brazil
100%
                                                                                         Rain and Hail Insurance Service de
                                                                                         Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
100%
                                                                              Rain and Hail Financial, Inc.
USA (Iowa)
100%
                                                         INAMAR Insurance Underwriting Agency, Inc.
USA (New Jersey)
100%
                                                                  INAMAR Insurance Underwriting Agency, Inc. of
                                                                  Texas
USA (Texas)
100%
                                                         Insurance Company of North America
                                                         (EI# 23-0723970, NAIC #22713, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%





                                                         Bankers Standard Insurance Company
                                                         (EI# 59-1320184, NAIC #18279, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                  Bankers Standard Fire and Marine Company
                                                                  (EI# 75-6014863, NAIC #20591, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                         ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company
                                                         (EI# 06-0237820, NAIC, #20699, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                  ACE Fire Underwriters Insurance Company
                                                                  (EI# 06-6032187, NAIC #20702, PA)
USA (Pennsylvania)
100%
                                                                  Atlantic Employers Insurance Company
                                                                  (EI# 23-2173820, NAIC #38938, NJ)
USA
(New Jersey)
100%
                                                                  ACE Insurance Company of the Midwest
                                                                  (EI# 06-0884361, NAIC #26417, IN)
USA (Indiana)
100%
                                                                  ACE Tempest Re USA, LLC
                                                                  
USA (Connecticut)
100%
                                                         ACE Structured Products, Inc.
                                                               
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                                  Recovery Services International, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                     ACE INA International Holdings, Ltd.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                  Rio Guayas, Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A.
Ecuador
99.9999999%
0.0000001% (AFIA Finance Corporation)
                                                  ACE Life Insurance Company Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                                                  Jerneh Insurance Berhad
Malaysia
100%
                                                  INACOMB S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
99.998%
0.002% (AFIA Finance Corporation)
                                                 ACE Australia Holdings Pty Limited
Australia
100%
                                                          ACE Insurance Limited
Australia
100%
                                                 PT. ACE Life Assurance
Indonesia
96.57%
                                                 ACE Life Insurance Company Limited
Vietnam
100%
                                                 ACE Insurance Company Limited
Vietnam
100%
                                                 ACE Seguradora S.A.
Brazil
99.9897%
.0100% (AFIA Finance Corporation)
                                                 ACE Participações Ltda.
Brazil
99%
1% (AFIA Finance Corporation)
                                                        ACE Resseguradora S.A.
Brazil
99.9908%
.0092% (ACE INA International Holdings, Ltd.)
                                                 ESIS Canada Inc.
Canada
100%
                                                 Servicios ACEINA, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
99.998%
one share (AFIA Finance Corporation)





                                                 ACE Seguros S.A.
Argentina
94.62%
4.73% (AFIA Finance Corporation)
                                                 ACE INA International Holdings Ltd. Agencia Chile
Chile
100%
                                                        ACE Seguros de Vida S.A.
Chile
95%
5% (AFIA Finance Corporation Agencia en Chile)
                                                        Ventas Personales Limitada
Chile
99%
1% (AFIA Finance Corporation Agencia en Chile)
                                                        ACE Seguros S.A.
Chile
85.83% (AIIH)
8.00% (AFIA Finance Corporation, Agencia en Chile)
5.95% - (AFIA Finance Corp. Chile Limitada)
0.22 (Non-ACE shareholders)
                                                ACE INA Overseas Holdings, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                        ACE European Holdings Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                                                  ACE European Group Limited
                                                                  
England & Wales
30.8723%
69.1277% (ACE Insurance S.A.- N.V.)
                                                                  ACE Insurance Management (DIFC) Limited
Dubai International Financial Centre
100%
                                                                  ACE European Holdings No 2 Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                                                           CJSC ACE Insurance Company
Russia
100%
                                                                           L.L.C. ACE Life Insurance
Russia
100%
                                                                           ACE Insurance S.A.-N.V.
Belgium
99.9492%
0.0507% (ACE INA International Holdings Ltd.)
                                                                                    ACE European Group Limited
                                                                                    
England & Wales
69.1277%
30.8723% (ACE European Holdings Limited)
                                                                  ACE Pension Trustee Limited
England &
Wales
100%





                                                ACE Seguradora S.A.
Macau
99.94%
                                                ACE Holdings Limited
Cayman Islands
100%
                                                ACE Insurance Company Egypt S.A.E.
Egypt
96.89%
0.88% (ACE INA Services UK Ltd.)
0.88% (ACE European
Holdings Limited)
                                                ACE Life Insurance Company S.A.E.
Egypt
98.34%
0.98% (ACE Holdings Limited)
0.68% (AFIA Finance Corporation)
                                                ACE Synergy Insurance Berhad
Malaysia
100%
                                                ACE Seguros S.A.
Colombia
99.958%
                                                ACE Seguros S.A.
Ecuador
100%
                                                ACE Seguros S.A.
Mexico
99.9%
                                                ACE Seguros S.A.
Panama
100%
                                                ACE Seguros S.A.
                                               (formerly Altas Cumbres Compañía de Seguros de Vida )
Peru
99.99%
0.01% (AFIA Finance Corporation)
                                                Eksupsiri Company Limited
Thailand
49%
50.99% (Nam Ek)
                                                         ACE Life Assurance Co. Ltd.
Thailand
75%
25% (Oriental Equity Holdings)
                                                Nam Ek Company Limited
Thailand
49%
                                                        Eksupsiri Company Limited
Thailand
50.99%
49% (AIIH)
                                                        Siam Liberty Insurance Broker Co., Ltd.
Thailand
75.01% (Nam Ek)
24.99% (AFC)
                                                ACE Insurance Limited
South Africa
100%
                                                ACE Insurance Limited
New Zealand
100%
                                                ACE International Management Corporation
Pennsylvania
100%
                                                Cover Direct, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                ACE INA G.B. Holdings, Ltd
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                         ACE INA Services U.K. Limited
England & Wales
100%
                                                Century Inversiones, S.A.
Panama
100%
                                                ACE Arabia Insurance Company Limited B.S.C. (C)
                                               
Bahrain
50%
                                                ACE Insurance Limited
Pakistan
100%
                                                ACE INA Overseas Insurance Company Ltd.
Bermuda
100%
                                                         ACE Canada Holdings, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                                 INACAN Holdings Ltd.
Canada (Ontario)
100%





                                                                       ACE INA Insurance
Canada
100%
                                                                       ACE INA Life Insurance
Canada
100%
                                                                       ACE Tempest Re Canada Inc.
Canada (Quebec)
100%
                                                         ACE Insurance Limited
Singapore
100%
                                                         ACE Insurance
Japan
100%
                                                                ACE Chintai SSI
Japan
100%
                                                                ACE Songai Service Kabushikigaisha
Japan
100%
                                                         ACE Marketing Group C.A.
Venezuela
100%
                                                ACE Insurance Company
                                                (EI# 66-0437305, NAIC #30953, PR)
Puerto Rico
100%
                                                                 ACE Insurance Agency, Inc.
Puerto Rico
100%
                                                ACE Insurance Limited
Hong Kong
100%
                                                ACE Alternative Risk Ltd.
                                               (formerly ACE Risk Management International Ltd.)
Bermuda
100%
                                                DELPANAMA S.A.
Panama
100%
                                                INAMEX S.A.
Mexico
100%
                                                Oriental Equity Holdings Limited
British Virgin Islands
100%
                                                AFIA Finance Corporation
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                                AFIA Finance Corporation Agencia en Chile
Chile
100%
                                                                AFIA Venezolana C.A.
Venezuela
100%
                                                                ACE ICNA Italy Societa a Responsabilita Limitata
Italy
99.7%
0.3% (AIIH)
                                                                Siam Liberty Insurance Broker Co., Ltd.
Thailand
49% (AFC)
50.93% (Nam Ek)
                                                                ACE Servicios S.A.
Argentina
100%
                                                                AFIA Finance Corp. Chile Limitada
Chile
98%
2% (AIIH)
                                                                Pembroke Reinsurance, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                                PT. ACE INA Insurance
Indonesia
98%
2.00% (PT. Adi Citra Mandiri)
                                                                RIYAD Insurance Co. Ltd.
Bermuda
80%
                                                                ACE Asia Pacific Services Pte. Ltd. (formerly Safire
                                                                Private Limited)
Singapore
100%
                                                                        ACE Asia Pacific Services Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
100%
                                                AFIA (INA) Corporation, Limited
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                                AFIA
Unincorporated
Association
60%
                                                AFIA (ACE) Corporation, Limited
USA (Delaware)
100%
                                                INAVEN, C.A. “Venezuela”
Venezuela
100%
                  ACE US Holdings, Inc.
USA (Delaware)
100%
                          ASI Administrative Services Inc.
Canada (Yukon)
100%
                          Rhea International Marketing (L), Inc.
Malaysia
60%





                          Westchester Fire Insurance Company
                          (EI# 92-0040526, NAIC# 10030, PA)   
                           (F/K/A ACE Indemnity Insurance Company)
USA
(Pennsylvania)
100%
                          Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
                          (EI# 58-2139927, NAIC #10172, GA)
USA (Georgia)
100%
                          Westchester Specialty Services, Inc.
USA (Florida)
100%
                          Westchester Specialty Insurance Services, Inc.
USA (Nevada)
100%




Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-178505) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-182062, 333-153239, 333-116532, 333-1400, 333-1402, 333-1404, 333-46301, 333-72299, 333-82175, 333-93867, 333-72301, 333-61038, 333-86102, 333-134504, 333-103701, and 333-168795) of ACE Limited of our report dated February 28, 2013 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 28, 2013



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Evan G. Greenberg, certify that:
1)
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ACE Limited;
2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2013
/s/ Evan G. Greenberg
Evan G. Greenberg
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Philip V. Bancroft, certify that:
1)
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ACE Limited;
2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2013
/s/ Philip V. Bancroft
Philip V. Bancroft
Chief Financial Officer


Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned officer of ACE Limited (the Corporation) hereby certifies that the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 , fully complies with the applicable reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
Dated: February 28, 2013
/s/ Evan G. Greenberg
 
Evan G. Greenberg
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned officer of ACE Limited (the Corporation) hereby certifies that the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 , fully complies with the applicable reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
Dated: February 28, 2013
/s/ Philip V. Bancroft
 
Philip V. Bancroft
 
Chief Financial Officer