Form 20–F

[_] Registration Statement pursuant to section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

or

[X] Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

or

[_] Transition Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from           to

Commission File Number: 001-12033

NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Canada
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

9900 Cavendish Blvd., Suite 306
St. Laurent, Quebec, Canada, H4M 2V2
(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
None Not Applicable

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act

Common Stock

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 15(d) of the Act

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

24,401,159 shares as of December 31, 2003

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  [X] No  [  ]

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17  [X] Item 18  [  ]

1


In this annual report, the term “Nymox” refers to both Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and its subsidiaries, Nymox Corporation and Serex Inc., and, where applicable, a predecessor private corporation, DMS Pharmaceuticals Inc. Unless otherwise indicated all dollar amounts are in United States Dollars.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

You should be aware that this report contains forward-looking statements about, among other things, the anticipated operations, product development, financial condition and operating results of Nymox, proposed clinical trials and proposed transactions, including collaboration agreements.

By forward-looking statements, we mean any statements that are not statements of historical fact, including (but not limited to) statements preceded by or that include the words, “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “hopes”, “targets” or similar expressions.

In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are including this cautionary statement to identify some of the important factors that could cause Nymox’s actual results or plans to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, Nymox. These factors, many of which are beyond the control of Nymox, include Nymox’s ability to:

  identify and capitalize on possible collaboration, strategic partnering or divestiture opportunities,

  obtain suitable financing to support its operations and clinical trials,

  manage its growth and the commercialization of its products,

  achieve operating efficiencies as it progresses from a development-stage to a later-stage biotechnology company,

  successfully compete in its markets,

  realize the results it anticipates from the clinical trials of its products,

  succeed in finding and retaining joint venture and collaboration partners to assist it in the successful marketing, distribution and commercialization of its products,

  achieve regulatory clearances for its products,

  obtain on commercially reasonable terms adequate product liability insurance for its commercialized products,

  adequately protect its proprietary information and technology from competitors and avoid infringement of proprietary information and technology of its competitors,

  assure that its products, if successfully developed and commercialized following regulatory approval, are not rendered obsolete by products or technologies of competitors and

  not encounter problems with third parties, including key personnel, upon whom it is dependent.

Although Nymox believes that the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report are reasonable, it cannot ensure that its expectations will be met. These statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed under “Risk Factors.”

2


PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not Applicable

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not Applicable

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for Nymox for the periods indicated, derived from financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). We prepare our basic financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP and include, as a note to the statements, a reconciliation of material differences to United States GAAP. The financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, Montreal, Canada as at and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
(In U.S. dollars (1))

Dec. 31,
2003
Dec. 31,
2002
Dec. 31,
2001
Dec. 31,
2000
Dec. 31,
1999

CANADIAN GAAP
                       
Current Assets     $ 747,672   $ 862,366   $ 644,522   $ 749,510   $ 776,824  
Property & Equipment       133,161     185,293     217,083     268,679     201,379  
Patents & Intellectual Property       3,154,243     3,223,498     3,154,441     3,144,015     966,937  
Total Assets       4,122,576     4,358,657     4,192,241     4,384,716     2,140,491  
Total Liabilities       1,724,164     1,471,727     747,493     323,774     833,344  
Share Capital       32,503,600     28,407,600     25,376,557     22,822,303     16,912,963  
Shareholder's Equity       1,598,412     2,086,930     2,644,748     3,260,942     1,307,147  
Total Revenues       200,132     361,748     380,609     225,867     190,203  
Sales, license fees and    
  research contracts       199,217     356,162     362,691     157,688     153,252  
Research & Development    
  Expenditures(2)       2,477,032     1,689,430     1,479,602     2,073,775     1,132,941  
Net Loss       4,363,699     3,422,019     3,049,504     4,023,979     3,314,296  
Loss per Share     $ 0.18   $ 0.15   $ 0.14   $ 0.19   $ 0.17  
Weighted Avg. No. of Common    
  Shares       23,669,852     22,651,639     21,873,966     20,890,735     19,886,430  

U.S. GAAP(3)
   
Net Loss     $ 4,395,428   $ 3,453,749   $ 3,095,133   $ 4,272,308   $ 3,409,166  
Loss per Share       0.19     0.15     0.14     0.20     0.17  
Shareholder's Equity     $ 1,468,589   $ 1,947,696   $ 2,496,104   $ 3,102,887   $ 1,139,731  


3


(1) Effective January 1, 2000, the Corporation adopted the United States dollar as its measurement currency as a result of the increasing proportion of operating, financing and investing transactions in the Canadian operations that are denominated in U.S. dollars. For Canadian GAAP purposes, the financial information for all periods presented up to December 31, 1999 has been translated into U.S. dollars at the December 31, 1999 exchange rate, which was 1.4433 Canadian dollars to the U.S. dollar. For U.S. GAAP purposes, assets and liabilities for 1999 have been translated into U.S. dollars at the ending exchange rate for the respective year and the statement of earnings at the average rate for the respective year. Reference is made to note 12 of the consolidated financial statements.

(2) We earn investment tax credits by making qualifying research and development expenditures. These amounts shown are net of investment tax credits.

(3) Reference is made to Note 12 of Nymox’s audited financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2003 for a reconciliation of differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP.

Risk Factors
The following risk factors apply to Nymox and our industry.

It is Uncertain When, if Ever, We Will Make a Profit

We first began operations in 1995 and are only in the early stages of commercial marketing of our diagnostic products, AlzheimAlert™, NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™. We have never made a profit. We incurred a net loss of $3.3 million in 1999, $4.0 million in 2000, $3.0 million in 2001, $3.4 million in 2002 and $4.3 million in 2003. As of December 31, 2003, Nymox’s accumulated deficit was $31.3 million.

We cannot say when, if ever, Nymox will become profitable. Profitability will depend on our uncertain ability to generate revenues from the sale of our products and the licensing of our technology that will offset the significant expenditures required for us to advance our research, protect and extend our intellectual property and develop, manufacture, license, market, distribute and sell our technology and products successfully. Similar types of expenditures in the past have helped produce the net losses reported above.

We May Not Be Able to Raise Enough Capital to Develop and Market Our Products

Nymox funded its operations primarily by selling shares of its common stock. Since late 1998, a small portion of the funds came from sales. However, sales have not been, and may not be in the foreseeable future, sufficient to meet our anticipated financial requirements.

We will continue to need to raise substantial amounts of capital for our business activities including our research and development programs, the conduct of clinical trials needed to obtain regulatory approvals and the marketing and sales of our products. We anticipate being able to fund our current total annual budgeted expenditures of approximately $4 million per year over the next year through our current cash position and additional financing, including draw downs through our common stock private purchase agreement with Lorros-Greyse Investments, Inc. Clinical trials will substantially increase cash requirements. We anticipate being able to meet these requirements as they arise. We plan to raise capital either through a new round of financing and/or through partnering with a major pharmaceutical company. Additional financing may not be available when needed, or, if available, may not be available on acceptable terms. If adequate funds on acceptable terms are not available, we may have to curtail or eliminate expenditures for research and development, testing, clinical trials, promotion and marketing for some or all of our products.

4


We Face Challenges in Developing, Manufacturing and Improving Our Products

Our success depends on our ability to develop or acquire rights to new products or to improve our existing products. We are still developing many of our products and have not yet brought them to market. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop or acquire rights to such products and to market them successfully.

Developing a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease is particularly challenging. Many pharmaceutical companies, institutions and researchers are working on many different approaches and treatments. There is no consensus among researchers about the cause of this fatal illness and no guarantee that our drug development programs in this area are targeting significant factors in its cause, progression or symptoms. It is difficult to design drug candidates that can cross from the bloodstream into the brain, where the damage from Alzheimer’s disease is occurring. Clinical trials to establish efficacy for drugs that slow down the progression of Alzheimer’s disease over a period of months or years often require that a large number of subjects be tracked over many months or years, making them very expensive to conduct. The potentially long period from discovery and patenting through development and regulatory approval to the market can significantly reduce the patent life of an Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Any marketed treatment in this area may well eventually face competition from “me-too” drugs developed by other pharmaceutical companies based on our research. We will be under constant competitive pressure to improve our products and to develop new treatments in order to protect our position in the field.

Developing and improving our diagnostic products is also challenging. The science and technology of the detection and measurement of very small amounts of biochemicals in bodily fluids and tissue is evolving rapidly. We may need to make significant expenditures in research and development costs and licensing fees in order to take advantage of new technologies. If any major changes to our testing technologies used in our AlzheimAlert™ and NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ tests are made, further validation studies will be required. Developing new diagnostic products is more challenging, requiring identification and validation of the biochemical marker being detected by the new product in the clinical context and the development and validation of the product designed to detect the marker.

We anticipate outsourcing at least some of the manufacturing required for new products we may develop in order to control start-up and operating costs and to take advantage of the existing manufacturing capabilities and capacity in the large contract manufacturing sectors in the pharmaceutical and diagnostic industries. There are risks associated with this strategy, including difficulties in the transfer of manufacturing, the possibility of production interruption due to causes beyond our control and the need to arrange alternative suppliers. We currently out-source some of the manufacturing services required for our NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ products to a contract manufacturer. We do not anticipate any significant risk of long-term interruption of manufacture due to this arrangement. The services supplied are not unique or unduly complicated and other contract manufacturers are available to provide similar services. The manufacture of therapeutics is more challenging and capital-intensive and may require us to partner with a major pharmaceutical company or other partner in order to manufacture a therapeutic for market.

We Face Significant and Growing Competition

The modern pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are intensely competitive, particularly in the field of Alzheimer’s disease where there is a large unmet need for an effective treatment. Currently there are five drugs with similar mechanisms of action approved for sale in the United States (Aricept®, Cognex®, Exelon®, Reminyl® and Namenda™). These drugs offer some relatively short-term symptomatic relief, but do not treat the underlying causes of the illness. Over the past decade, there has been an intense research effort both in the non-profit sectors such as universities, government agencies and research institutes and in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry to develop new treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Treatment candidates under development include:

5


  vaccines for Alzheimer's disease;

  enzyme-blocking therapies intended to block the production of the protein found in the senile plaques characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease. A number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies including Amgen, Elan and Bristol-Myers Squibb are working on such therapies;

  drugs aimed at reducing, blocking or clearing the aggregation or accumulation of the protein found in senile plaques. A number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies including Neurochem, Praecis Pharmaceuticals and Prana Biotechnology are working on such therapies;

  memory enhancing compounds from Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Memory Pharmaceuticals, Helicon Therapeutics and Sention, among others;

  drugs aimed at inhibiting an enzyme that breaks down an important neurotransmitter involved in memory and cognition. A number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies including Axonyx are working on such therapies; and

  implantation of a shunt (COGNIShunt™) developed by its maker, Eunoe Inc., and designed to drain cerebrospinal fluid from the patient’s skull into his or her abdominal cavity.

There is also ongoing research into possible methods of preventing Alzheimer’s disease such as taking certain cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins, estrogen replacement therapies, anti-oxidants such as vitamin E and ginkgo biloba or anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen ( e.g., Advil or Motrin). The successful development of a treatment or method of preventing Alzheimer’s disease could significantly impact on our ability to develop or market a competing treatment for Alzheimer’s disease.

Our treatments under development for enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia or BPH) face significant competition from existing products. There are six drugs approved for treatment of BPH: finasteride (Proscar®), terazozin (Hytrin®), doxazozin (Cardur®), tamsulosin (Flomax®), prazosin (Minipres®) and alfusozin (Uroxatral®). There are a number of thermal treatments on the market designed to shrink the enlarged prostate by heating its tissue with a device inserted through the urethra (the tube leading from the bladder through the penis through which men urinate) or through the abdomen. The devices on the market use microwave energy (Prostatron®, Targis Therapy® or TherMatrx®), low level radiowaves (TUNA System®), lasers (Indigo LaserOptic Treatment System® or Laserscope GreenLight PVP™), direct heat, energy or hot water to heat or burn away prostate tissue. A variety of surgical procedures exist to surgically reduce or remove the prostate or to widen the urethra. These include procedures to cut away prostate tissue such as TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) and using a resectoscope with an electrical loop inserted through the penis to cut the prostate tissue. A small device used to widen the constricted urethra called a prostatic stent can also be inserted.

The diagnostic testing industry is also highly competitive. In the area of Alzheimer’s disease, Athena Diagnostics, Inc. markets diagnostic tests for different biochemical indicators found in blood and spinal fluid and for genetic predispositions for the illness. Other companies are attempting to develop and market other diagnostic products in this area. The introduction of other diagnostics products for Alzheimer’s disease or tobacco product use that are cheaper, easier to perform, more accurate or otherwise more attractive to the physicians, health care payers or other potential customers would have a significant impact on the sales of our AlzheimAlert™, NicAlert™ or TobacAlert™ products.

6


We May Not Be Able to Successfully Market Our Products

To increase our marketing, distribution and sales capabilities both in the United States and around the world, we will need to enter into licensing arrangements, contract sales agreements and co-marketing deals. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into agreements with other companies on terms acceptable to us, that any licensing arrangement will generate any revenue for the company or that the costs of engaging and retaining the services of a contract sales organization will not exceed the revenues generated.

Our Products and Services May Not Receive Necessary Regulatory Approvals

Our diagnostic products, AlzheimAlert™, NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™, and our products in development, are subject to a wide range of government regulation governing laboratory standards, product safety and efficacy. The actual regulatory schemes in place vary from country to country and regulatory compliance can take several years and involve substantial expenditures.

We cannot be sure that we can obtain necessary regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all, for our products in development and all of the following could have a material adverse effect on our business:

  failure to obtain or significant delays in obtaining requisite approvals;

  loss of or changes to previously obtained approvals; and

  failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements.

We currently market AlzheimAlert™ as a clinical reference laboratory service provided by our government-inspected clinical reference laboratory in New Jersey. Physicians send us urine samples from their patients to our laboratory where the AlzheimAlert™ test is performed and the results reported back to the physicians. A clinical laboratory test like AlzheimAlert™ does not require approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Our laboratory is regulated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and is subject to inspection and certification. In addition, individual states like New York and Florida have their own requirements for reference laboratories like ours that offer diagnostic services. In addition, the FDA has its own regulations governing in vitro diagnostic products, including some of the reagents used in clinical reference laboratories. Any changes in CMS or state law requirements or in the FDA regulations could have a detrimental impact on our ability to offer or market any reference laboratory services and/or on our ability to obtain reimbursement from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and providers.

We have developed a diagnostic kit based on AlzheimAlert™ for sale to third parties. We will require prior approval from the FDA before we can market, distribute or sell this product in the United States. In February 2004, we filed a premarket approval application (PMA) with the FDA for the AlzheimAlert™ kit version following the completion of clinical testing. We have not yet received a decision whether the FDA will approve our application. We cannot predict with any certainty when or if such approval will be forthcoming and it is possible that the FDA may require more clinical testing or further documentation before approval. If approved, the diagnostic kit would then be subject to postmarketing record and reporting obligations and manufacturing requirements. Similar requirements exist in many other countries. Obtaining these approvals and complying with the subsequent regulatory requirements can be both time-consuming and expensive.

7


We currently sell NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ as tests for tobacco product use and exposure and for research use. In October, 2002, we received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for our NicAlert™ product.

In the United States, our drugs in development will require final FDA approval before their sale or distribution. Such approval comes only at the end of a lengthy, expensive and often arduous process. We have not submitted any drugs for final FDA approval. In 2003, we successfully completed the first two Phase 1 and Phase 1-2 U.S. clinical trials for NX-1207, our investigational new drug treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We are commencing a pivotal Phase 2 clinical trial. We cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of this trial, what further steps may be required in order to apply for final FDA approval for this drug or whether the FDA will ultimately grant us such approval. Similar requirements exist in many other countries.

Protecting Our Patents and Proprietary Information is Costly and Difficult

We believe that patent and trade secret protection is important to our business, and that our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain strong patents, to maintain trade secret protection and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent position is costly. We pay for the filing, prosecution and fees of over 200 patents and patent applications in countries around the world, including the United States, Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Korea. In the United States alone, Nymox has fifteen patents issued or allowed and thirteen patent applications pending relating to its technology. Its subsidiary, Serex,, Inc. has ten patents issued and allowed. Through licensing agreements with the Massachusetts General Hospital, Nymox separately licensed global patent rights relating to neural thread proteins and to novel cancer markers that have potential application both for the treatment and diagnosis of specific cancers. These licensed patent rights include five issued United States patents and numerous patents and patent applications in other countries around the world.

We believe that we have strong patent protection for the products we sell and for our product development programs and are in the process of extending that patent protection to cover more countries or new discoveries or products. We cannot assure you that additional patents covering new products or improvements will be issued or that any new or existing patents will be of commercial benefit or be valid and enforceable if challenged.

We are not currently involved in patent litigation. In the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry patent disputes are frequent and can preclude the commercialization of products. Patent litigation is costly and the outcome often difficult to predict. It can expose us to significant liabilities to third parties and may require us to obtain third-party licenses at a material cost or cease using the technology or product in dispute.

We Face Changing Market Conditions

The healthcare industry is in transition with a number of changes that affect the market for therapeutic and diagnostic test products. The U.S. Federal and various state governments have under consideration a number of proposals that may have the effect of directly or indirectly limiting drug prices in the U.S. markets. Such changes may adversely affect the prices we may charge for any therapeutic drug we develop. Funding changes and budgetary considerations can lead major health care payers and providers to make changes in reimbursement policies for our AlzheimAlert™ product. These changes can seriously impact the potential for growth for the market for AlzheimAlert™, either favorably when the decision is to offer broad coverage for our test at a reasonable price or negatively when the decision is to deny coverage altogether. Changes in the healthcare delivery system have resulted in major consolidation among reference laboratories and in the formation of multi-hospital alliances, reducing the number of institutional customers for therapeutic and diagnostic test products. There can be no assurance that Nymox will be able to enter into and/or sustain contractual or other marketing or distribution arrangements on a satisfactory commercial basis with these institutional customers.

8


Health Care Plans May Not Cover or Adequately Pay for our Products and Services

Throughout the developed world, both public and private health care plans are under considerable financial and political pressure to contain their costs. The two principal methods of restricting expenditures on drugs and diagnostic products and services are to deny coverage or, if coverage is granted, to limit reimbursement. For single-payer government health care systems, a decision to deny coverage or to severely restrict reimbursement for one of our products can have an adverse effect on our business and revenues.

In the United States, where, to a significant degree, the patient population for our products is elderly, Medicare and Medicaid are sources of reimbursement. In general, any restriction on reimbursement, coverage or eligibility under either program could adversely affect reimbursement to Nymox for products and services provided to beneficiaries of the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs. Many elderly people are covered by a variety of private health care organizations either operating private health care plans or Medicare or Medicaid programs subject to government regulation. These organizations are also under considerable financial constraints and we may not be able to secure coverage or adequate reimbursement from these organizations. Without coverage, we will have to look to the patients themselves who may be unwilling or unable to pay for the product; in turn, doctors may be reluctant to order or prescribe our products in the absence of coverage of the product for the patient.

The Issuance of New Shares May Dilute Nymox’s Stock

The issuance of further shares and the eligibility of issued shares for sale will dilute our common stock and may lower its share price. There were 24,788,134 common shares of Nymox issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2004. All of these shares are eligible for sale under Rule 144 or are otherwise freely tradable, with the exception of 1,090 shares held by one shareholder which are restricted for a period of one year. In addition, 2,065,500 share options are outstanding, of which 1,985,500 are currently vested and 385,496 shares are subject to issuance upon exercise of warrants. Expiry dates for Nymox options are evenly divided over the next 2 to 9 years. These options have been granted to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the company. Moreover, Nymox may use its shares as currency in acquisitions.

We Face Potential Losses Due to Foreign Currency Exchange Risks

Nymox incurs certain expenses, principally relating to salaries and operating expenses at its Canadian head office, in Canadian dollars. All other expenses are derived in U.S. dollars. As a result, we are exposed to the risk of losses due to fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar. We protect ourselves against this risk by maintaining cash balances in both currencies. We do not currently engage in hedging activities. We cannot say with any assurance that the Company will not suffer losses as a result of unfavorable fluctuations in the exchange rates between the United States dollar and Canadian dollar.

9


We Have Never Paid a Dividend and are Unlikely to do so in the Foreseeable Future

Nymox has never paid any dividends and does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. We expect to retain any earnings or positive cash flow in order to finance and develop Nymox’s business.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

History of the Company

Nymox was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act in May, 1995 to acquire all of the common shares of DMS Pharmaceutical Inc., a private company which had been carrying on research and development since 1989 on diagnostics and drugs for brain disorders and diseases of the aged with an emphasis on Alzheimer’s disease. Nymox has two subsidiaries: one wholly owned subsidiary named Nymox Corporation and the other a majority owned subsidiary named Serex, Inc., purchased in March, 2000. Both subsidiaries are based in the same building in Maywood, New Jersey, but each have separate facilities within the building. Nymox Corporation operates our certified clinical reference laboratory where our AlzheimAlert™ test is performed, and conducts some research and development, while Serex conducts research and development, and some of the manufacturing for NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™.

Nymox’s principal executive offices are located at:

  Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
        9900 Cavendish Boulevard, Suite 306
        St. Laurent, Quebec, Canada, H4M 2V2
        Phone: (800) 936-9669
        Fax: (514) 332-2227

Nymox’s registered agent in the United States is:

  CT Corporation System
        208 South Lasalle St.
        Chicago, IL 60604

Nymox’s two subsidiaries are located at:

  Nymox Corporation
        230 West Passaic St.
        Maywood, NJ, USA 07607

  Serex, Inc.
        230 West Passaic St.
        Maywood, NJ, USA 07607

We specialize in the research and development of therapeutics and diagnostics for the aging population with an emphasis on Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive, terminal brain disease of the elderly marked by an irreversible decline in mental abilities, including memory and comprehension, and often accompanied by changes in behavior and personality. It currently afflicts an estimated 4.5 million people in the United States and at least fifteen million people worldwide. As the baby-boomer generation continues to age, these figures are expected to rise sharply. Our subsidiary, Serex, Inc., specializes in the development of diagnostic products for a wide range of indications based on its proprietary patented diagnostic platforms and technologies.

10


Acquisition of a Majority Interest in Serex, Inc.

On March 2, 2000, we closed our acquisition of a controlling interest in Serex, Inc., a privately held diagnostic company based in Maywood, New Jersey. We have subsequently acquired more shares of the common stock of Serex, Inc. from other shareholders and now own approximately 98% of its common stock.

Serex’s NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ strips can reliably detect one of the metabolic products of nicotine in human urine, in order to determine whether a person, such as a teenager or insurance applicant, is using or has been exposed to a tobacco product. NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ are currently being distributed by Nymox, CVS Pharmacy, Drugstore.com and Jant Pharmacal Corporation.

Serex developed and patented its particle valence technology, a unique, highly sensitive, new method to detect very small amounts of biochemical indicators in body fluids such as blood, urine and saliva. This technology can be adapted to detect a wide range of biochemical indicators for diseases, conditions and drug use.

Serex also assisted in the development of our AlzheimAlert™ test.

Diagnostic Products for Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia in persons 65 years of age and older and is the fourth leading cause of death among the elderly. Despite the need for an accurate clinical test, the definitive diagnosis of the disease is possible only after the death of the patient by expert, pathologic examination of brain tissue.

The Surgeon General’s Report on Mental Health, released on December 13, 1999, identified the importance and the need for the early detection and diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The report described the current approach to Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis, clinical examination and the exclusion of other common causes of its symptoms, as time- and labor-intensive, costly and largely dependent on the expertise of the examiner. As a result, the illness is currently underrecognized, especially in primary care settings, where most older patients seek care. The report joined other experts writing in the field in recognizing the need for a better, more reliable method for diagnosing the disease in living patients and in particular, the need of a simple, accurate and convenient test that could detect a biochemical change early in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. We believe our AlzheimAlert™ product provides such a test.

The AlzheimAlert™ Test; An Aid to the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

We market a proprietary diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s disease, known as the AlzheimAlert™ test, through our government-inspected clinical reference laboratory in Maywood, New Jersey. AlzheimAlert™ is an improved version of our AD7C™ test, which has been on the market since 1997. It is a urine test, where the patient provides a first-morning urine sample for testing. The patient’s doctor then forwards the sample to our laboratory where our technical staff performs the test. We then report the results to the doctor.

Our AlzheimAlert™ test is the latest generation of our NTP testing technology. It measures the level of a brain protein called neural thread protein (NTP) which is elevated early in Alzheimer’s disease as reported both in the scientific literature and at scientific conferences. Researchers at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Brown University led by Doctors Suzanne de la Monte and Jack Wands first found large amounts of the protein in the brain tissue of patients known to have died with Alzheimer’s disease. Subsequent research led to the characterization of NTP and the gene that produces it. Nymox succeeded in developing a highly sensitive test to detect the presence of NTP in the spinal fluid and, most recently, in the urine of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. A recent study (J. Neuropathol Exp Neurol (2001; 60: 195-207)) has provided further evidence that increased production of NTP leads to a marked increase in nerve cell death and shown that the cells subjected to NTP died in a programmed fashion similar to the way the nerve cells in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease die. One of the characteristic signs of Alzheimer’s disease is widespread brain cell loss.

11


Nymox believes that its AlzheimAlert™ test can assist a physician faced with the task of diagnosing whether a patient has Alzheimer’s disease. In company funded trials of its NTP testing technology to date, involving over 500 clinical samples, the test results were positive for over 80% of the patients with verified Alzheimer disease and negative in over 89% of subjects without the disease (known as a low false positive rate). The low rate of positive results for patients without the disease is important for doctors investigating patients with subtle or marginal symptoms of mental, emotional, cognitive, or behavioral changes. If the doctor can rule out Alzheimer’s with more assurance, a great deal of patient and family anguish and anxiety will be avoided. A low test score will help the doctor to be more certain that Alzheimer’s disease is not the cause of the patient’s symptoms and to target the other, often reversible causes of the patient’s symptoms, such as depression.

Many studies published in scientific publications or presented at scientific conferences over the past decade have confirmed the accuracy of NTP as a biochemical marker for Alzheimer’s disease. Recent publications in the peer-reviewed literature include, for example, the Journal of Clinical Investigation (1997; 100: 3093-3104); Journal of Contemporary Neurology (1998; art. 4a); Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis (1998; 12: 285-288) and (1998; 12: 223-226); Alzheimer’s Reports (1999; 2: 327-332), (2000; 3: 177-184), (2001; 4: 61-65) and (2002; 5: 1-6); Neurology (2000; 54: 1498-1504) and (2000; 55: 1068); Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease (2001; 3: 345-353), Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (2002; 1: 2-7), and Frontiers in Bioscience (2002; 7: d989-96). Reports about this Nymox technology have also been featured in prestigious trade and lay publications such as Clinica (Sept.25, 2000), Genetic Engineering News (Oct.1, 2000), Clinical Laboratory News (Sept., 1999 and Oct., 2000), Modern Maturity (Dec., 2000), ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory (June, 2001), ASRT Scanner (August, 2001), RN magazine (August, 2001), Clinical Geriatrics (Nov., 2000), LabMedica International (June, 1998), and Clinical Laboratory International (October, 1998).

There can be no assurance that further studies will repeat the same level of success experienced to date.

The early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease is important to physicians, patients and their families and enables them to make informed and early social, legal and medical decisions about treatment and care. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease has become increasingly important with new improvements in drug treatment and care. Even a modest delay in institutionalization can mean substantial social and financial savings. Conversely, any testing procedure that could rule out Alzheimer’s disease would eliminate the tremendous uncertainty and anxiety patients and their families otherwise face and would allow physicians to focus on the other, often reversible, causes of cognitive changes.

Early diagnosis as facilitated by the AlzheimAlert™ test represents a potentially large cost-savings in the form of a reduced number of office visits, lab tests, scans and other procedures required by the traditional methods of diagnosis.

12


The AlzheimAlert™ test is an aid to diagnosis, to be considered together with patient history, physical examination and other relevant medical data. The test does not replace a physician’s diagnosis.

We intend to sell a diagnostic kit version of the AlzheimAlert™ test that we developed. Such a kit, if approved, would permit the testing of patient samples either in a general purpose medical laboratory or in a physician’s office. The sale of such a kit is subject to any necessary regulatory approvals. AlzheimAlert™ offers a more technically advanced means to detect elevated levels of NTP in urine. It is a completely new assay in the competitive affinity format and has significant advantages of easy adaptability to systems and equipment present in all modern clinical laboratories.

We expect that, if approved, a diagnostic kit version of AlzheimAlert™ kit will increase the availability and acceptance of our test while lowering its cost to the patient or health care payor.

Other Biochemical Indicators of Alzheimer’s Disease

We hold exclusive patent rights to several other biochemical indicators for Alzheimer’s disease, including the brain protein, 35i9, which we believe is also associated with Alzheimer’s disease. We intend to use our extensive scientific, medical and commercial experience and know-how in the field of Alzheimer’s disease in order to develop new diagnostic tests, methods and treatments for the disease from these and other indicators.

Development of Therapeutic Products for Alzheimer’s Disease

At present, there is no cure for Alzheimer’s disease. There are five drugs approved by the FDA, tacrine (brand-name Cognex®), donepezil HCI (brand-name Aricept®), rivastigmine (brand-name Exelon®), galantamine hydrobromide (brand name Reminyl®) and memantine (brand name Namenda™) for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. However, at most these drugs offer symptomatic relief for the loss of mental function associated with the disease and possibly help to delay the illness- progression. There is no consensus as to the cause of Alzheimer’s disease or even whether it is one disease or many.

There is an urgent need for an effective treatment for the illness, caused in part by the rising health care, institutional and social costs for the treatment and care of Alzheimer’s disease sufferers. The Surgeon General’s Report on Mental Health released on December 13, 1999, put the direct health care costs for the illness in the United States at almost $18 billion for 1996. In April 2002, the National Institute on Aging reported that the cost of care to family, caregivers and society in general was estimated to exceed $100 billion per year.

These costs are expected to rise sharply as the baby boom generation ages and more people become at risk for the disease. According to the National Institute on Aging’s Progress Report on Alzheimer’s Disease, 2001-2002, by 2050, researchers estimate that 14 million Americans will have Alzheimer’s disease if current population trends continue and no preventive treatments become available. The age group of Americans over the age of 85 is one of the fastest growing segments of the population. As people live longer, they become more at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.

Nymox’s research into drug treatments for Alzheimer’s disease is aimed at compounds that could arrest the progression of the disease and therefore are targeted for long term use.

13


Drugs Targeting Spherons

We are a leader in research and development into drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease that target spherons. Nymox researchers believe that spherons are a cause of senile plaques, the characteristic lesion found abundantly in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and believed by many researchers to play a pivotal role in the fatal illness. Spherons are tiny balls of densely packed protein found in brain cells scattered throughout the brains of all humans from age one. Nymox researchers have found that as humans age the spherons grow up to a hundred times larger until they become too large for the cells that hold them. Once released from the cells, the researchers believe that the spherons burst, creating senile plaques, contributing to the cellular damage and biochemical changes pivotal to the symptoms and signs of Alzheimer’s disease.

The substantial evidence linking spherons to senile plaques and Alzheimer’s disease has been published in journals such as the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease , Drug News & Perspectives and Alzheimer Reports . There are 20 important criteria of validity which have been set forth correlating the disappearance of spherons in old age with the appearance of senile plaques and implicating spherons as a major cause in Alzheimer’s disease. In 2000, Nymox researchers published important findings in Alzheimer Reports (2000; 3: 177-184) confirming that spherons contain key proteins that are also known to be in senile plaques and showing that, like senile plaques, spherons contain unusually old proteins in terms of the human body’s metabolism, with an average age of 20 to 40 years. In 2003, Nymox announced the discovery that spherons contain toxic molecules termed spherotoxins which its researchers believe contribute significantly to the cell death and symptoms characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease.

Nymox researchers believe that stopping or inhibiting the transformation of spherons into senile plaques will help stop or slow the progress of this illness. You should be aware that there is no consensus among researchers about the causes or possible treatments of Alzheimer’s disease and that not all researchers share this belief that spherons are a causative factor in Alzheimer’s disease or are a target for the development of treatments for the disease.

Based on these research findings and this approach to the treatment of the disease, we developed novel, proprietary drug screening methods based on spherons and used them to discover, develop and test drug candidates to inhibit the formation of Alzheimer plaques from spherons. These candidates have the potential to slow or stop the progression of the disease.

We have two distinct new drug candidates, NXD-3109 and NXD-1191, neither of which demonstrate significant toxicity and both of which had positive animal testing results. These candidates are at the stage of pre-clinical testing.

Such drug candidates will require regulatory approval in order to begin clinical studies for humans. You should be aware there is no guarantee that any of these drug candidates will ever be approved for marketing as a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Drug candidates that look promising in early studies in the laboratory or with animals often prove on further testing to be unsafe, ineffective or impractical to use with human patients. The cost of bringing a drug candidate through the necessary clinical trial and regulatory approvals is very high and may require us to seek substantial financing through various sources including the issuing of more stock, the borrowing of funds secured by financial instruments such as bonds or agreements with major pharmaceutical companies. We risk not being able to secure such funding in the necessary amounts or on sufficiently favorable terms.

Nymox holds global patent rights covering both methods for using spherons as targets for developing drugs and for the actual drug candidates discovered.

14


Neural Thread protein Based Drugs

Nymox developed a unique drug screening system, based on the research that led to its AlzheimAlert™ test, to identify other potential drug candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. There is a substantial body of evidence showing that NTP may play a key role in Alzheimer’s disease. The published studies include Journal of the Neurological Sciences (1996; 138: 26-35), Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology (1996; 55: 1038-50), Journal of Clinical Investigation (1997; 100: 3093-3104), Alzheimer’s Reports (1999; 2: 327-332), Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease (2001; 3: 345-353) and Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2001; 58: 844-849) and (2003; 60:2679-91). A recent study published in the Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology (2001; 60: 195-207) reported on how a team of researchers at Brown University led by Dr. Suzanne de la Monte and Dr. Jack Wands implanted the gene that produces NTP in nerve cells derived from humans. They then caused the cells to turn on the implanted NTP gene and to begin to produce NTP in elevated quantities. This caused a marked increase in nerve cell death. Sophisticated analysis showed that the cells died in a programmed fashion similar to the way the nerve cells in brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease die. Extensive loss of brain cells and accompanying brain shrinkage is a key part of the Alzheimer’s disease process.

Nymox screened compounds for their ability to impede this process of premature cell death and thus potentially help slow or halt the loss of brain cells in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. This screening process identified promising drug candidates. The Company has targeted the candidate, NXD-9062, for human trials. NXD-9062 has shown significant progress in key preclinical studies but successful completion of pre-clinical studies is necessary before it can move into formal regulatory studies.

Nymox licensed this technology in 1997 from Harvard University and the Massachusetts General Hospital as part of a sponsored research and licensing agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, Nymox sponsored the research of the principal investigators, Dr. Suzanne de la Monte and Dr. Jack Wands, into the use of neural thread protein, its antibodies or genes for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Nymox also paid the patent costs for the patent applications filed arising out of this research. In return, Nymox received an exclusive worldwide license of the patents to sell products and to use processes encompassed by them. Nymox is to pay the Massachusetts General Hospital a 4% royalty of the net sales price of any product developed and sold under the license. Nymox currently pays this royalty on its sales of its AlzheimAlert™ product. The license and the obligation to pay patent costs and royalties continues for the life of the patents, which run until November, 2014 at the earliest. The Massachusetts General Hospital has the right to terminate the license in any country where, after the first commercial sale of the product in the country, there is a continuous two year period in which no product is sold in such country. There are four issued U.S. patents and five outstanding U.S. patent applications under license and a correspondingly larger number of patents and patent applications in Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Korea. The sponsored research portion of this agreement was transferred to Brown University and the Rhode Island Hospital as of March, 1999, when Dr. de la Monte and Dr. Wands moved to Brown University.

Nymox also has a similar sponsored research and licensing agreement with Brown University and the Rhode Island Hospital where Dr. de la Monte and Dr. Wands now carry out their research into neural thread protein. Under the terms of this agreement, which became effective March 1, 1999 and was renewed in January 2002, Nymox sponsors the research of the principal investigators, Dr. Suzanne de la Monte and Dr. Jack Wands, into the uses of neural thread proteins, their antibodies or genes for diagnostic, therapeutic and research purposes. Nymox also pays the patent costs for any patent applications filed arising out of this research. In return, Nymox will receive an exclusive worldwide license of the patents to sell products and to use processes encompassed by them. The Rhode Island Hospital has the right to terminate the license in any country where, after the first commercial sale of the product in the country, there is a continuous two year period in which no product is sold in such country. Nymox is to pay the Rhode Island Hospital a 4% royalty of the net sales price of any product developed and sold under the license. There is one U.S. patent application currently under license.

15


The Use of Statin Drugs for the Treatment or Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease

In October 2002, we were issued a United States patent for the use of statin drugs to treat, prevent or reduce the risk of the onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Statins are a class of commonly prescribed cholesterol lowering drugs that have a well-established safety record and are widely available. A number of published studies showed a link between statin use and lower incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Research in this area is ongoing and no statin drug has been approved for use in the treatment or prevention of Alzheimer’s disease.

New Antibacterial Agents Against Infections and Food Contamination

We are developing new antibacterial agents for the treatment of urinary tract and other bacterial infections in humans which have proved highly resistant to conventional antibiotic treatments and for the treatment of E. coli O157:H7 bacterial contamination in hamburger meat and other food and drink products.

Nymox has developed four new antibacterial agents:

  NXB-4221 for the treatment of difficult chronic and persistent urinary tract infections;

  NXB-5886 for the treatment of streptococcal infection; and

  NXT-1021 for the treatment of staphylococcal infection; and

  NXC-4720 for the treatment of E. coli contamination of meat and other food and drink products

In the last ten years there has been a growing recognition of the increasing problem of antibiotic-resistant infections and the need for truly novel antibacterial drugs. See, for example, the European Commission report dated May 28, 1999, “Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance” and the report from the Interagency Task Force on Antimicrobial Resistance, co-chaired by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health, entitled A Public Health Action Plan to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance, released on January 19, 2001.

Urinary tract infections in women caused by bacteria such as E. coli are a common and significant infection often resistant to conventional antibiotic treatment. Some varieties of streptococcus and staphylococcus bacteria, a common source of infection in humans, have acquired a broad immunity to antibiotic treatments. Infections from these antibiotic resistant bacteria are difficult to treat and can be life threatening.

Nymox’s three antibacterial agents for the treatment of infectious disease have all shown the ability to kill their bacterial targets in culture with no signs of toxicity. Further pre-clinical testing and development is required before we can apply for regulatory approval to begin initial testing in humans.

E. coli contamination of food and drink is a serious public health problem worldwide and a major concern for meat processors in particular. E. coli bacteria occur normally and usually harmlessly in the gastrointestinal tracts of humans, cows and other animals. However, one mutant variety of the E. coli bacteria, E. coli O157:H7, can cause life-threatening illness and has been implicated in cases of severe diarrhea, intestinal bleeding and kidney failure, leading, in some cases, to death in children and the elderly. E. coli contamination in hamburger meat and other food products and in drinking water affects about 70,000 people in the United States a year.

16


There is a well-recognized need in the beef industry to address the problem of E. coli contamination in meat processing and in livestock. E. coli contamination has triggered massive recalls of ground beef in the U.S. Cattle are a natural reservoir for the deadly strain of E. coli . Water contamination from cattle operations have led to public health tragedies.

Nymox developed a potent new antibacterial agent, NXC-4720. Tests of NXC-4720 show it to be highly effective against all known substrains of E. coli O157:H7, the bacteria implicated in these severe cases of food and drink contamination. Tests of NXC-4720 show that it destroys E. coli O157 strains, including H7, efficiently, rapidly and at a very low dose. In 1999, we began further laboratory trials for this agent as a treatment for food and drink contamination and are continuing trials with various collaborators, including the Department of Food Science at the University of Manitoba. Further pre-clinical testing and development is required before we can apply for regulatory approval for use of this agent on the processing of food and drink for human consumption.

Nymox has patent rights to these and other antibacterial agents.

Development of Therapeutic Products for Enlarged Prostate

We are developing treatments for enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia or BPH), using novel compounds. In 2003, we successfully completed the first two Phase 1 and Phase 1-2 U.S. clinical trials for one treatment candidate, NX-1207, and are commencing a pivotal Phase 2 clinical trial. We cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of this trial, what further steps may be required in order to apply for final FDA approval for this drug or whether the FDA will ultimately grant us such approval.

More than half of men in their sixties and as many as 90% of men in their seventies and eighties have some symptoms of BPH. Symptoms include more frequent urination (especially at night), difficulty urinating, incomplete emptying of the bladder and sometimes complete inability to urinate. More serious cases may require surgical intervention to reduce the size of the prostate. There is a need for a simple, effective treatment for BPH, particularly in cases where existing drug treatments have proven to be ineffective and where more intrusive procedures such as surgery which may be inadvisable or bring unacceptable risks.

The NicAlert™ Test for Tobacco Product Use and the TobacAlert™ Test for Second-Hand Smoke Exposure

We also market NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ inexpensive, simple-to-use test strips that use urine to determine whether a person is using tobacco products (NicAlert™) or been recently exposed to second-hand smoke (TobacAlert™). Both NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ detect levels of cotinine, a by-product of the body’s breakdown of nicotine and generally regarded as the best indicator of tobacco exposure for smokers and nonsmokers.

Smoking and other tobacco product use is a serious public health problem. Smoking kills. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cigarette smoking is responsible for more than 430,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. Smoking can cause cancer of the lung, mouth, bladder, larynx and esophagus among others, heart disease and stroke and chronic lung disease. Every year, exposure to second-hand smoke (environmental tobacco smoke or ETS) causes an estimated 3,000 nonsmoking Americans to die of lung cancer and up to 300,000 American infants and small children to suffer from lower respiratory tract infections.

17


NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ employ Serex, Inc.’s patented technology. NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ are currently being used in research programs into tobacco use and exposure and are being marketed in the United States and Switzerland as a test to determine whether a person, such as a teenager, student athlete or insurance applicant, is using a tobacco product or been exposed to second-hand smoke. In October 2002, NicAlert™ received clearance from the FDA.

Manufacturing Arrangements

Our NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ products are currently partly manufactured through out-sourcing arrangements with contract manufacturers. To date, we have not experienced any significant interruptions in the manufacture of these products and the cost of the manufacturing services has not been volatile. The manufacturing services supplied by our current contract manufacturer are not unique or unduly complicated and other contract manufacturers are available to provide similar services in the event that our current contract manufacturer fails to meet our needs.

Property, Plant And Equipment

Nymox and Serex laboratory facilities in Maywood, New Jersey comprise 4,687 square feet of leased space. That lease agreement expires February 28, 2005. Nymox office and research facilities in St. Laurent, Quebec, Canada comprise 6,923 square feet of leased space. The lease agreement expires on August 31, 2005. Nymox Pharmaceutical Corp. and its two US subsidiaries Nymox Corp. and Serex, Inc. own a full complement of equipment used in all aspects of their research and development work and the Nymox reference laboratory. Nymox believes that its facilities are adequate for its current needs and that additional space, if required, would be available on commercially reasonable terms.

Governmental Regulation

Our AlzheimAlert™ test which we provide as a service through our clinical reference laboratory in Maywood, New Jersey is subject to extensive government regulation in the United States. Our clinical reference laboratory and its performance of the AlzheimAlert™ must be certified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), which establishes quality standards for the laboratory tests being performed to ensure the accuracy, reliability and timeliness of patient test results. In addition, some individual states such as New York, Florida and New Jersey have their own requirements for the inspection and certification of reference laboratories which offer diagnostic services for patients within the state. Finally, the FDA has its own regulations governing in vitro diagnostic products, including analyte-specific reagents used in clinical reference laboratories. Any changes in our current certification status, CMS or state law requirements or in the FDA regulations could have an impact on our future ability to offer or market any reference laboratory services and/or on our ability to obtain reimbursement from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and providers.

We intend to sell a diagnostic kit version of the AlzheimAlert™ test that we developed. We will need to obtain FDA approval before we can market or sell such a diagnostic kit version outside of the clinical reference laboratory setting in the United States. Such approval for this type of commercial development is necessary for all in vitro diagnostic kits.

In February 2004, we filed a premarket approval application (PMA) with the FDA for the AlzheimAlert™ kit version following the completion of clinical testing. We have not yet received a decision whether the FDA will approve our application. We cannot predict with any certainty when or if such approval will be forthcoming and it is possible that the FDA may require more clinical testing or further documentation before approval.

18


The regulatory process leading to such approval can be time-consuming and expensive and can result in an outright denial or a very limited approval only. Our product will be subject to premarketing and postmarketing requirements applicable to such devices, including those governing:

  clinical testing;

  design control procedures;

  prior FDA approval of a 510(k) application, where the FDA has determined that our diagnostic device is substantial equivalent to a marketed device, or a premarket approval application, where the FDA has been satisfied with clinical studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy of our device;

  postmarketing record and reporting obligations; and

  good manufacturing practices.

The requirements for a premarket approval application are analogous to those for the approval of a new drug and include four categories of information: indications for use, device description and manufacturing methods, alternative practices and procedures for the diagnosis of the disease and clinical and nonclinical studies. The requirements for a 510(k) application are generally less onerous but still include indications for use, safety and effectiveness data as well as manufacturing and quality assurance data and information. There can be no assurance that the AlzheimAlert™ test or any other medical device that we may develop in the future will obtain the necessary approvals within a specified time framework, if ever. In addition, the FDA may impose certain postmarketing requirements that may significantly increase the regulatory costs associated with our product. The FDA has recourse to a wide range of administrative sanctions and civil and criminal penalties in order to enforce the applicable laws, rules and regulations.

Our therapeutic products under development by Nymox would also have to receive regulatory approval. This is a costly, lengthy and risky process. In the United States, in order for a product to be marketed, it must go through four distinct development and evaluation stages:

  Product Evaluation

We must conduct preliminary studies of potential drug candidates using various screening methods to evaluate them for further testing, development and marketing.

  Optimization of Product Formulation

The activities in this stage of development involve consultations between us and investigators and scientific personnel. Preliminary selection of screening candidates to become product candidates for further development and further evaluation of drug efficacy is based on a panel of research based biochemical measurements. Extensive formulation work and in vitro testing are conducted for each of various selected screening candidates and/or product candidates.

  Clinical Screening and Evaluation

During this phase of development, portions of which may overlap with product evaluation and optimization of product formulation, initial clinical screening of product candidates is undertaken and full scale clinical trials commence. The FDA must approve any clinical testing on healthy subjects (Phase 1) and on patients (Phase 2 and 3).

19


  Final Product Development

The activities to be undertaken in final product development include performing final clinical evaluations, conducting large-scale experiments to confirm the reproducibility of clinical responses, making clinical lots for any additional extensive clinical testing that may be required, performing any further safety studies required by the FDA, carrying out process development work to allow pilot scale production of the product, completing production demonstration runs for each potential product, filing new drug applications, product license applications, investigational device exemptions (and any necessary supplements or amendments) and undergoing comprehensive regulatory approval programs and processes.

We cannot assure you that we will successfully complete the development and commercialization of any therapeutic products.

In the United States, obtaining the necessary FDA approval for any drug is a lengthy, expensive and often arduous process. We cannot predict with any certainty the amount of time the FDA will take to approve one of our drugs or even whether any such approval will be forthcoming. Similar requirements exist in many other countries.

In the United States, the FDA approval procedure is a two-step process. We must file an investigational new drug (IND) application for each product with the FDA before beginning the initial (Phase I) clinical testing of the new drug in healthy subjects. If the FDA has not commented on or questioned the application within 30 days of its filing, initial clinical studies may begin. If, however, the FDA has comments or questions, the questions must be answered to the satisfaction of the FDA before initial clinical testing can begin. In some instances, this process could result in substantial delay and expense. Phase I studies are intended to demonstrate the functional characteristics and safety of a product.

After Phase I testing, we must conduct extensive clinical trials with patients in order to establish the efficacy and safety of our drug. Once we complete the required clinical testing, we expect to have to file a new drug application for FDA approval in order to market most, if not all, of our new drugs. The application is complicated and detailed and must include the results of extensive clinical and other testing, the cost of which is substantial. The FDA conducts an extensive and often lengthy review of such applications. The agency is required to review applications within 180 days of their filing, but, during the review, frequently requests that additional information be submitted. This starts the 180-day regulatory review period anew when the requested additional information is submitted and, as a result, can significantly extend the review period. Until the FDA actually approves the new drug application, there can be no assurance that the agency will consider the information requested and submitted to justify approval. The packaging and labeling of products are also subject to FDA regulation. Accordingly, it is impossible to anticipate when the FDA will approve a new drug application.

For NX-1207, our investigational new drug treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), we successfully filed an IND application and, in 2003, completed the first two Phase 1 and Phase 1-2 U.S. clinical trials. We are commencing a pivotal Phase 2 clinical trial. We cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of this trial, what further steps may be required in order to apply for final FDA approval for this drug or whether the FDA will ultimately grant us such approval.

20


We must also obtain approval for our drugs or diagnostic devices from the comparable regulatory authority in other countries before we can begin marketing our product in that country. The approval procedure varies from country to country and can involve additional testing. The time required may differ from that required for FDA approval. Although there are some procedures for unified filings for certain European countries, in general each country has its own procedures and requirements, many of which are time-consuming and expensive. Thus, there can be substantial delays in obtaining required approvals from both the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities after the relevant applications are filed.

After such approvals are obtained, further delays may be encountered before the products become commercially available. If, subsequent to approval, new information becomes available concerning the safety or effectiveness of any approved product, the regulatory authority may require the labeling for the affected product to be revised or the product to be withdrawn. Our manufacturing of any approved drug must conform with the FDA’s good manufacturing practice regulations which govern the production of pharmaceutical products and be subject to inspections and compliance orders.

Government regulation also affects our ability to receive an appropriate level of reimbursement for our products. Throughout the developed world, both public and private health care plans are under considerable financial and political pressure to contain their costs. The two principal methods of restricting expenditures on drugs and diagnostic products and services are to deny coverage or, if coverage is granted, to limit reimbursement. For single-payer government health care systems, a decision to deny coverage or to severely restrict reimbursement for one of our products can have an adverse effect on our business and revenues.

In the United States, where, to a significant degree, the patient population for our products is elderly, Medicare and Medicaid are sources of reimbursement. In general, any restriction on reimbursement, coverage or eligibility under either program could adversely affect reimbursement to Nymox for products and services provided to beneficiaries of the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs. Many elderly people are covered by a variety of private health care organizations either operating private health care plans or Medicare or Medicaid programs subject to government regulation. These organizations are also under considerable financial constraints and we may not be able to secure coverage or adequate reimbursement from these organizations. Without coverage, we will have to look to the patients themselves who may be unwilling or unable to pay for the product; in turn, doctors may be reluctant to order or prescribe our products in the absence of coverage of the product for the patient.

In response to rising health care costs, the U.S. Congress implemented sweeping changes to the U.S. Medicare and Medicaid systems in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and is currently considering a number of other proposals that could significantly impact on the level of funding for Medicare and Medicaid programs. Under the new Part C: Medicare + Choice programs, beneficiaries can now opt for a variety of health delivery models, including coordinated care plans, HMOs, preferred provider organizations and provider sponsored organizations, private fee-for-service plans and medical savings account plans. In addition, states now have the option to require Medicaid recipients to enroll with managed health care plans without first obtaining a waiver, making it substantially easier for the states to meet their Medicaid obligations through private managed care organizations. All these health care delivery systems, including the original Medicare and Medicaid systems, are subject to funding formulas and spending caps and may compensate for these restrictions by limiting coverage, eligibility and/or payments. The long-term impact of these legislative changes in terms of their efficiency, effectiveness and financial viability in delivering health care services to an aging population is uncertain at present. Any legislative or regulatory actions to reduce or contain federal spending under either the Medicare or Medicaid programs could adversely affect our ability to participate in either program as a provider or supplier of services or products and the amount of reimbursement under these programs potentially available to us.

21


Our AlzheimAlert™ test, and any of the new diagnostic and therapeutic products and services that we may develop, will be subject to coverage determinations by health care providers and payers. Federal and state regulations and law and internal coverage policies of health care organizations affect our ability to obtain payments for our products and services. The Medicare program will not pay for any expenses incurred for items or services that are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member. Historically, CMS interpreted this provision in order to exclude from Medicare coverage those medical and health care services that are not demonstrated to be safe and effective by acceptable clinical evidence. CMS recently revised both its national coverage policies and procedures in general and specifically its coverage of diagnostic laboratory tests and constituted a Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee to provide advice on the effectiveness and appropriateness of medical items and services that are eligible for coverage under Medicare. It is unknown how these changes will affect our ability to obtain Medicare coverage for its products and services. However, an adverse national coverage decision with respect to one of our products or services will make it impossible to receive reimbursement from Medicare for that product and more difficult to convince private health care organizations to provide coverage for it. Even if we receive a favorable coverage decision for one of our products or services, there is no guarantee that the level of reimbursement for it will be close to our retail price for it or commensurate with the costs of developing and marketing it.

Patents And Proprietary Information

We believe that patent and trade secret protection is important to our business, and that our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain strong patents, to maintain trade secret protection and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others.

The commercial success of products incorporating our technologies may depend, in part, upon our ability to obtain strong patent protection. We cannot assure you that additional patents covering new products or improvements will be issued or that any new or existing patents will be of commercial benefit or be valid and enforceable if challenged.

We pursue a policy of seeking patent protection for valuable patentable subject matter of our proprietary technology and require all employees, consultants and other persons who may have access to its proprietary technology to sign confidentiality agreements.

Nymox has fifteen U.S. patents issued or allowed and thirteen U.S. patent applications pending and a corresponding larger number of patents and patent applications worldwide relating to the inventions and discoveries in those patents and patent applications. Nymox has issued patents in the main European markets, including Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden and Spain among others and in other countries such as Japan, Canada and Australia. These patents and patent applications cover much of our current product development and technologies, including new drug candidates, proprietary screening technologies for finding drugs, promising diagnostic markers, new diagnostic assay methods, methods of treating meat and other food products; and anti-infective agents. The earliest expiry date for its patents is in March, 2007; the next is in February, 2009 and the rest range from 2010 through 2017.

Nymox’s subsidiary, Serex, has ten patents issued or allowed and four patent applications pending in the United States and a corresponding larger number of patents and patent applications worldwide. These patents and patent applications cover such areas as Serex’s proprietary diagnostic technologies and methodologies. The expiry dates for its patents range from 2012 to 2017.

22


Nymox also has exclusive rights to five issued or allowed U.S. patents and seven pending U.S. patent applications as well as a corresponding larger number of patents and patent applications worldwide through research and license agreements. The earliest of these patents expires in 2014.

Many companies have patents covering various drugs, methods and discoveries in the fields of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease and related conditions and of new anti-infective agents. We believe that the patents issued to date will not preclude Nymox from developing and marketing our products; however, it is impossible to predict the extent to which licenses from third parties will be necessary. If Nymox were to need licenses from third parties there can be no assurance that we could obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

In the fields of diagnostic methods and diagnostic tests for common human diseases and conditions, where Serex has many of its patents, there are many patents issued covering many areas of diagnostic methods, tests and technologies. We believe that these patents issued to date to other companies will not preclude Serex from developing and marketing its products but you should be aware that it is often difficult to determine the nature, breadth and validity of competing patent claims in these fields, that there has been significant litigation in some of these areas (not involving Serex) and that, if and when Serex’s products become more commercially successful, Serex’s products or patents may become the subject matter of litigation. If Serex were to need licenses from third parties there can be no assurance that it could obtain such license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Neither Nymox nor Serex are currently involved in litigation over patent and other intellectual property rights but significant litigation over these matters in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry is not uncommon. The validity and extent of patent rights can be very difficult to determine and involve complex legal, factual and scientific questions. Important legal issues about patent protection in the field of biotechnology have not been resolved. Patent litigation is costly and time-consuming and can consume substantial resources. An adverse decision can preclude the marketing of a product, expose us to significant liabilities or require us to obtain third party licenses, which may not be available at commercially reasonable prices.

We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, and continuing technological advancement to develop and maintain our competitive position. We control the disclosure and use of our know-how and confidential information through agreements with the parties involved. In addition, we have confidentiality agreements with our key employees, consultants, officers and directors. There can be no assurance, however, that all confidentiality agreements will be honored, that others will not independently develop equivalent technology, that disputes will not arise as to the ownership of intellectual property, or that disclosure of our trade secrets will not occur. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others have not obtained or will not obtain patent protection that will exclude us from using our trade secrets and confidential information. To the extent that consultants or research collaborators use intellectual property owned by others in their work with us, disputes may also arise as to the rights to related or resulting know-how or inventions.

Competition

Rapidly evolving technology and intense competition are the hallmarks of modern pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Our competitors include:

  major pharmaceutical, diagnostic, chemical and biotechnology companies, many of which have financial, technical and marketing resources significantly greater than ours;

23


  biotechnology companies, either alone or in collaborations with large, established pharmaceutical companies to support research, development and commercialization of products that may be competitive with ours; and

  academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations which are conducting research into Alzheimer’s disease and which increasingly are patenting, licensing and commercializing their products either on their own or through joint ventures.

In the field of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis, our AlzheimAlert™ test faces growing competition which could detrimentally impact on our ability to successfully market and sell our diagnostic test. Our competitors include:

  Athena Diagnostics, Inc. which is currently marketing three tests claimed to aid in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a genetic test for the rare cases of familial, early-onset Alzheimer’s disease; a genetic test for a relatively common mutation of a gene said to increase the likelihood of a person with at least one of the genes contracting the disease; and a test for two proteins in the spinal fluid of patients.

  Syn X Pharma which developed a blood test for a common human enzyme said to be elevated in Alzheimer’s disease. Syn X recently announced plans to market the test following the decision by Ortho-MacNeil Diagnostics to terminate its license to the test.

There are also a number of other proposed biochemical signs of the disease that could potentially be developed into a commercial diagnostic test as well as various scanning and imaging technologies which might compete some day for a portion of the diagnostic market for Alzheimer’s disease.

We also face intense competition for the development of an effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. The market conditions for an Alzheimer’s disease drug strongly favor the entry of other corporations into the area. The current market for therapeutic drugs for Alzheimer’s disease is an estimated $2 billion. This market is expected to grow rapidly as new drugs enter the market and as the baby boom generation becomes more at risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease. As a result, most of the major pharmaceutical companies and many biotechnology companies have ongoing research and development programs for drugs and treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Many of these companies have much greater scientific, financial and marketing resources than we have and may succeed in developing and introducing effective treatments for Alzheimer’s disease before we can. At present, four drugs for Alzheimer’s disease are being widely marketed in the United States, Aricept® by Pfizer, Exelon® by Novartis, Reminyl® by Janssen and Namenda™ by Forest. These four drugs only treat some of the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease by enhancing memory and other mental functions and not the underlying causes of the illness.

A similar competitive reality prevails in the field of novel anti-infectives. Over the past ten years, there has been an increasing awareness of the medical need and of emerging market opportunities for new treatments for antibiotic resistant bacterial infections. Many of the major pharmaceutical companies are developing anti-infective drugs that either modify their existing drugs or involve new anti-bacterial properties. Many biotechnology companies are developing new classes of anti-bacterial drugs. At least three major pharmaceutical companies have vaccines against bacterial infections in development. To the extent that these companies are able to develop drugs or vaccines that offer treatment for some or all of the indications for our anti-infectives, the market for our products may be adversely affected.

24


Our treatments under development for enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia or BPH) face significant competition from existing products. There are six drugs approved for treatment of BPH: finasteride (Proscar®), terazozin (Hytrin®), doxazozin (Cardura®), tamsulosin (Flomax®), prazosin (Minipres®) and alfusozin (Uroxatral®). There are a number of thermal treatments on the market designed to shrink the enlarged prostate by heating its tissue with a device inserted through the urethra (the tube leading from the bladder through the penis through which men urinate) or through the abdomen. The devices on the market use microwave energy (Prostatron®, Targis Therapy® or TherMatrx®), low level radiowaves (TUNA System®), lasers (Indigo LaserOptic Treatment System® or Laserscope GreenLight PVP™), direct heat or hot water to heat or burn away prostate tissue. A variety of surgical procedures exist to surgically reduce or remove the prostate or to widen the urethra. These include procedures to cut away prostate tissue such as TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) and using a resectoscope with an electrical loop inserted through the penis to cut the prostate tissue. A small device used to widen the constricted urethra called a prostatic stent can also be inserted.

The problem of E. coli O157:H7 contamination of hamburger meat and other food products is also well-known and a number of companies and researchers have been pursuing various potential solutions, including irradiation with x-rays, better detection of contamination, electronic pasteurization, vaccination and competitive exclusion of the pathogenic E. coli bacteria by harmless bacteria. The development of alternative solutions to the problem of E. coli infection may adversely affect the market for our treatment for E. coli O157:H7 infection in cattle and contamination of food products.

Marketing

We currently market our AlzheimAlert™ test as a clinical reference laboratory service primarily in the United States. We are also marketing NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™ tests, which can determine a person’s exposure to tobacco products, in the United States through our own marketing arm and distributors, and in Switzerland with Health4u AG. We have not started to commercially market or distribute any of our other products under development and most of them will require regulatory approval in each country before being marketed there.

At present, we do most of our marketing ourselves. To increase our marketing, distribution and sales capabilities both in the United States and around the world, we will need to enter into licensing arrangements, contract sales agreements and co-marketing deals. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into agreements with other companies on terms acceptable to us, that any licensing arrangement will generate any revenue for the company or that the costs of engaging and retaining the services of a contract sales organization will not exceed the revenues generated.

If successfully developed and approved, we plan to market and sell our therapeutic and diagnostic products directly or through co-promotion arrangements or other licensing arrangements with third parties. In cases where we have sole or shared marketing rights, we plan to build a small, focused sales force if and when such products approach marketing approval in some markets, including Europe. Implementation of this strategy will depend on many factors, including the market potential of any products we develop as well as on our financial resources. To the extent we will enter into co-promotion or other licensing arrangements, any revenues received by us will be dependent on the efforts of third parties.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

General

We are a development stage biopharmaceutical company that specializes in the research and development of therapeutics and diagnostics for the aging population with an emphasis on Alzheimer’s disease.

25


We market the AlzheimAlert™ test, which we provide in our clinical reference laboratory, that is an aid to the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. AlzheimAlert™ is an improved version of our AD7C™ test, from which we began generating revenue from sales in 1997.

We also market NicAlert™ and TobacAlert™, our two products, which determine a person’s level of exposure to tobacco products.

We have under development therapeutic agents for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, for the treatment of enlarged prostate (BPH) and of certain antibiotic-resistant infections as well as antibacterial agents for E. coli contamination of food and drink products.

We also have the rights to a U.S. patent for the use of statin drugs for the treatment or prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease.

We have incurred operating losses throughout our history. Management believes that such operating losses will continue for the next few years. The costs relating to clinical trials for our potential therapeutic products will increase expenditures and delay profitability, despite anticipated increases in sales revenue in the coming years.

All figures are presented in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated.

Liquidity And Capital Resources

We fund our operations and projects primarily by selling shares of Nymox’s common stock. However, since 1997, a small portion of our funding came from sales. This source of funding became more significant in late 1998, following the launch of our urinary version of the AD7C™ test. Since its incorporation in May, 1995, Nymox raised the capital necessary to fund its on-going research and development work and its marketing and sales operations primarily through private placements of its shares.

On December 1, 1997, our common shares began trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Nymox’s common shares also traded on the Montreal Exchange from December 18, 1995 to November 19,1999.

Private placements completed by Nymox since December, 1995 are as follows:

  December 1995, 1,578,635 common shares at a price of CAN$2.00 (US$1.38) per share for total proceeds of CAN$3,157,270 (US$2,187,536);
  April 1996, 877,300 common shares at a price of CAN$6.00 (US$4.15) per share for total proceeds of CAN$5,263,800 (US$3,647,059);
  May 1997, 696,491 common shares at a price of CAN$6.50 (US$4.50) and warrants exercisable at a price of CAN$8.50 (US$5.88) per share for total proceeds of CAN$4,527,191 (US$3,136,694). In 1998, all 696,491 of these warrants were exercised for additional proceeds to Nymox of CAN$5,920,174 (US$4,101,832);
  May 1998, 231,630 common shares at a price of CAN$8.50 (US$5.88) for total proceeds of CAN$1,968,855 (US$1,364,134). A total of 110,000 warrants were issued as well, exercisable at a price of CAN$8.50 (US$5.88) per share (50,000) and CAN$10.00 (US$6.93) per share (60,000). These warrants have since expired;
  December 1998, 135,000 common shares and January 1999, 55,000 common shares at CAN$8.50 (US$5.88) per share, for total proceeds of CAN$1,615,000 (US$1,118,963). A total of 95,000 warrants were issued as well, exercisable at the price of CAN$10.00 (US$6.93) per share. These warrants have since expired;

26


  September 1999, 122,000 common shares at CAN$5.00 (US$3.46) per share, for total proceeds of CAN$610,000 (US$422,642).
  March 2000, 821,637 common shares at an average price of $4.87 per share, for total proceeds of $4,000,000. A total of 93,334 warrants were issued as well, exercisable at a price of $9.375 per share (66,667) and $7.8125 per share (26,667). These warrants expire on March 6, 2004.
  March, 2001, 200,000 common shares at $2.06 per share, for total proceeds of $412,000. A total of 100,000 warrants were issued as well, exercisable at a price of $2.06. These warrants were exercised on February 17, 2003.
  August 3, 2001, 80,000 common shares at $2.50 per share for total proceeds of $200,000.
  August 22, 2001, 140,000 common shares at $3.75 per share for total proceeds of $525,000.
  October 3, 2001, 110,000 common shares at $3.75 per share for total proceeds of $412,500.
  November 14, 2001, 64,100 common shares at $3.90 per share for total proceeds of $250,000.
  January 24, 2002, 74,074 common shares at $4.05 per share for total proceeds of $300,000.
  March 18, 2002, 195,000 common shares at $4.20 per share for total proceeds of $819,000.
  June 18, 2002, 90,000 common shares at $4.00 per share for total proceeds of $360,000.
  July 17, 2002, 86,000 common shares at $4.68 per share for total proceeds of $403,000.
  September 9, 2002, 91,000 common shares at $4.40 per share for total proceeds of $400,400.
  November 27, 2002, 53,500 common shares at $3.75 per share for total proceeds of $200,625.
  December 17, 2002, 125,000 common shares at $4.10 per share for total proceeds of $512,500.
  February 17, 2003, 100,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $2.06 per share for total proceeds of $206,000.

From March 2000 to January 2003, we received a total of $1,327,273 for the following sales of our shares pursuant to a common stock purchase agreement with an investment company.

  August 16, 2000, 152,616 common shares at a volume weighted average price of $3.2924 per share;
  October 12, 2000, 137,889 common shares at a volume weighted average price of $3.6261 per share;
  February 7, 2001, 161,696 common shares at a volume weighted average price of $2.0240 per share;
  May 31, 2001, 56,108 common shares at a volume weighted average price of $1.9466 per share.

This common stock purchase agreement expired in January 2003. As part of the agreement we issued to the investment company a stock purchase warrant, which expires November 30, 2004, permitting it to purchase up to 200,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.53 per share.

On January 27, 2003 we entered into a Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement with an investment company, Lorros-Greyse Investments, Ltd., for the future issuance and purchase of Nymox’s common shares. In general, the agreement provided Nymox with a commitment from the investment company to purchase up to $5 million of Nymox’s common shares over the twenty-four month period beginning in January 2003. At any time during that period, we may give notice to the investment company requiring it to purchase a specified dollar amount of our shares. The amount specified in any one notice may be up to $500,000 but not less than $150,000. The maximum amount can be higher if both parties agree. The number of shares Nymox will issue to the investment company in return for that money will be equal to the amount specified in the notice divided by 97% of the average market price of our common shares for the five trading days preceding the giving of the notice.

Under this agreement dated January 27, 2003, we received a total of $2,360,000 for the following shares under this common stock private purchase agreement:

  January 30, 2003, 107,382 common shares at a price of $3.725 per share.
  March 3, 2003, 245,098 common shares at a price of $4.08 per share.
  June 6, 2003, 167,224 common shares at a price of $2.99 per share.
  July 8, 2003, 80,128 common shares at a price of $3.12 per share.
  August 8, 2003, 77,778 common shares at a price of $2.70 per share.

27


On August 25, 2003, we signed a new Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement, whereby the same investor is committed to purchase up to $12 million of Nymox’s common shares over the twenty-four month period beginning in August 2003, subject to the same terms and conditions as before.

Under this agreement dated August 25, 2003, we have received to date a total of $3,130,000 for the following shares under this common stock private purchase agreement:

  September 30, 2003, 204,918 common shares at a price of $2.44 per share.
  October 21, 2003, 182,203 common shares at a price of $2.36 per share.
  December 8, 2003, 106,383 common shares at a price of $2.82 per share.
  December 22, 2003, 109,091 common shares at a price of $2.75 per share.
  January 14, 2004, 102,041 common shares at a price of $3.92 per share.
  February 27, 2004, 69,284 common shares at a price of $4.33 per share.
  March 10, 2004, 100,402 common shares at a price of $4.98 per share.
  April 15, 2004, 92,807 common shares at a price of $4.31 per share.

On May 31, 2004, Nymox had $8.9 million of financing available under the facility. We expect this stock purchase agreement to provide sufficient financing to enable us to advance our research and product development for the next two years.

Also, the Company has received total proceeds of $669,144 from the exercise of 256,900 options since 1995 as follows:

  $355,536 for 158,900 shares at a per share price of $2.25.
  $258,858 for 83,000 shares at a per share price of $3.12.
  $16,000 for 5,000 shares at a per share price of $3.20.
  $38,750 for 10,000 shares at a per share price of $3.875.

Pursuant to the share purchase agreement entered into to acquire a controlling interest of Serex, Inc., a total of 257,607 additional shares and 158,526 warrants were issued in exchange for the shares of Serex. Since January 2004, 131,940 of these warrants have been exercised under a “cashless exercise”, whereby the warrant holder receives a number of shares equivalent in value to the net difference between the strike price on the warrant and the average market price on the day before the date of the “cashless exercise”, according to a formula contained in the warrant agreement. The net effect of these “cashless exercises” has been the issuance of 21,351 shares of Nymox. Another 1,090 of these warrants were exercised resulting in the issuance of 1,090 shares of Nymox, for proceeds of $4,033.

In total, Nymox has raised over $33 million, since its incorporation in May 1995.

We have no financial obligations of significance other than long-term lease commitments for our premises in the United States and Canada of $17,099 per month in 2004 and ongoing research funding payments to a U.S. medical facility totaling $229,750 for 2004. Total commitments beyond 2003 are summarized in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

A demand note payable by the Company to an independent party of $500,000, bearing interest at the prime rate plus 2% and due on or before July 31, 2004, is expected to be refinanced prior to maturity.

28


Results Of Operations

Overview

Since inception, the Company has focused its activities on developing certain pharmaceutical technologies and obtaining outside funding to support the continued development of its technologies. The Company has incurred losses since inception of operations. Future profitability will depend on the Company’s ability to generate revenues from the sale of products and the licensing of technology sufficient to offset the expenditures required to further the Company’s research and development program and ongoing operations. See Item 4 of this report for a description of the projects in the Company pipeline.

Effective January 1, 2000, the Company adopted the US dollar as its measurement currency. All amounts presented are in US dollars.

In 2000, the Company acquired a majority interest in Serex, Inc. for a consideration comprising common shares, warrants and options.

Critical Accounting Policies

In December 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) released “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies”. According to the SEC release, accounting policies are among the “most critical” if they are, in management’s view, most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and most demanding on their calls for judgement.

Our accounting policies are described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. We consider the following policies to be the most critical in understanding the judgements that are involved in preparing our financial statements and the matters that could impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has generally derived its revenue from product sales, research contracts, license fees and interest. Revenue from product sales is recognized when the product or service has been delivered or obligations as defined in the agreement are performed. Revenue from research contracts is recognized at the time research activities are performed under the agreement. Revenue from license fees, royalties and milestone payments is recognized upon the fulfillment of all obligations under the terms of the related agreement. These agreements may include upfront payments to be received by the Corporation. Upfront payments are recognized as revenue on a systematic basis over the period that the related services or obligations as defined in the agreement are performed. Interest is recognized on an accrual basis. Deferred revenue presented in the balance sheet represents amounts billed to and received from customers in advance of revenue recognition.

The Company currently markets AlzheimAlert™ as a service provided by our CLIA certified reference laboratory in New Jersey. Physicians send urine samples taken from their patients to our laboratory where the AlzheimAlert™ test is performed. The results are then reported back to the physicians. We recognize the revenues when the test has been performed. The Company sometimes enters into bulk sales of its diagnostic products to customers under which it has a future obligation to perform related testing services at its laboratory. Although the Company receives non-refundable upfront payments under these agreements, revenue is recognized in the period that the Company fulfils its obligation or over the term of the arrangement. For research contracts and licensing revenues, the Company usually enters into an agreement specifying the terms and obligations of the parties. Revenues from these sources are only recognized when there are no longer any obligations to be performed by the Company under the terms of the agreement.

29


Valuation of Capital Assets

The Company reviews the unamortized balance of property and equipment, intellectual property rights and patents on an annual basis and recognizes any impairment in carrying value when it is identified. Factors we consider important, which could trigger an impairment review include:

  Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business; and
  Significant negative industry or economic trends.

Valuation of Future Income Tax Assets

Management judgement is required in determining the valuation allowance recorded against net future tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $9.4 million as of December 31, 2003, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize some of our future tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating losses carried forward and other unclaimed deductions, before they expire. In assessing the realizability of future tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the future tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of future tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and tax planning strategies. The generation of future taxable income is dependent on the successful commercialization of its products and technologies.

New Accounting Policies

Refer to note 2(j) of our 2003 consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations 2003


Selected Annual Information
2003
2002
2001
Total Revenues (excluding interest income)     $199,217   $356,162   $362,691  

Net Loss     $(4,363,699 ) $(3,422,019 ) $(3,049,504 )

Loss per share (basic & diluted)     $(0.18 ) $(0.15 ) $(0.14 )

Total Assets     $4,122,576   $4,358,657   $4,192,241  



Quarterly Results 2003
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Total Revenues (excl. interest income)     $33,544   $75,326   $58,356   $31,991  

Net Loss     $(928,490 ) $(1,122,889 ) $(847,163 ) $(1,465,157 )

Loss per share (basic & diluted)     $(0.04 ) $(0.05 ) $(0.04 ) $(0.06 )


Quarterly Results 2002

Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Total Revenues (excl. interest income)     $62,305   $172,958   $70,841   $50,058  

Net Loss     $(883,017 ) $(843,578 ) $(799,681 ) $(895,743 )

Loss per share (basic & diluted)     $(0.04 ) $(0.04 ) $(0.04 ) $(0.03 )


30


YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

Results of Operations

Net losses were $4,363,699, or $0.18 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $3,422,019, or $0.15 per share, for the corresponding period in 2002. The weighted, diluted, average number of common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2003 were 23,771,858 compared to 22,965,668 for the same period in 2002.

Revenues

Revenues from sales amounted to $199,217 for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared with $356,162 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The reduction in marketing expenditures (due to regulatory tasks and trials associated with the kit format of the products) accounted for the reduction in revenues for AlzheimAlert™ (decrease 39%) and for NicAlert™ (decrease 43%) in 2003. The Company anticipates that revenues will increase if and when product candidates pass regulatory milestones and are launched on the market.

Research and Development

Research and development expenditures were $2,510,051 for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared with $1,706,086 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase is attributable to higher spending in the development of the therapeutic products in the Company’s pipeline. In 2003, research tax credits amounted to $33,019 compared to $16,656 in 2002. The rise is due to an increase in the expenses admissible for government tax credits. The Company anticipates that research and development expenditures will not increase significantly as product candidates finish development and clinical trials.

Marketing Expenses

Marketing expenditures were $197,435 for the year ended December 31, 2003, in comparison to expenditures of $235,925 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease is attributable to planned reduced costs relating to marketing agreements. The Company anticipates that marketing expenditures will increase if and when new products are launched on the market.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $1,326,618 for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared with $1,230,439 in the year ended December 31, 2002 due to increased professional fees. The Company anticipates that general and administrative expenditures will increase as new product development leads to expanded operations.

Foreign Exchange

The Company incurs expenses in the local currency of the countries in which it operates, which include the United States and Canada. Approximately 70% of 2003 expenses (75% in 2002) were in U.S. dollars. Foreign exchange fluctuations, which are included under general and administrative expenses, had no meaningful impact on the Company’s results in 2003 or 2002.

31


Inflation

The Company does not believe that inflation has had a significant impact on its results of operations.

Long-Term Commitments

Nymox has no financial obligations of significance other than long-term lease commitments for its premises in the United States and Canada of $17,099 per month and ongoing research funding payments to a U.S. medical facility totaling $229,750.


Contractual Obligations
Total
Current
1-3 years
4-5 years
Rent     $291,034   $205,193   $85,841   $0  

Operating Leases     $31,666   $10,029   $21,637   $0  

Other Long Term Obligations     $229,750   $229,750   $0   $0  

Total Contractual Obligations     $552,450   $444,972   $107,478   $0  


Financial Position

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2003, cash totaled $605,603 and receivables including tax credits totaled $60,522. In January 2003, the Corporation signed a common stock private purchase agreement whereby the investor was committed to purchase up to $5 million of the Corporation’s common shares over a twenty-four month period commencing January 2003. Under this agreement, five drawings were made for total proceeds of $2,360,000. Specifically, on January 30, 2003, 107,382 common shares were issued at a price of $3.725 per share. On March 3, 2003, 245,098 common shares were issued at a price of $4.08 per share. On June 6, 2003, 167,224 common shares were issued at a price of $2.99 per share. On July 8, 2003, 80,128 common shares were issued at a price of $3.12 per share. On August 8, 2003, 77,778 common shares were issued at a price of $2.70 per share.

In August 2003, the Corporation signed a new common stock private purchase agreement, whereby the same investor is committed to purchase up to $12 million of the Corporation’s common shares over a twenty-four month period commencing August 25, 2003. As at May 31, 2004, eight drawings were made under this purchase agreement, for total proceeds of $3,130,000. Specifically, on September 30, 2003, 204,918 common shares were issued at a price of $2.44 per share. On October 21, 2003, 182,203 common shares were issued at a price of $2.36 per share. On December 8, 2003, 106,383 common shares were issued at a price of $2.82 per share. On December 22, 2003, 109,091 common shares were issued at a price of $2.75 per share. On January 14, 2004, 102,041 common shares were issued at a price of $3.92 per share. On February 27, 2004, 69,284 common shares were issued at a price of $4.33 per share. On March 10, 2004, 100,402 common shares were issued at a price of $4.98 per share. On April 15, 2004, 92,807 common shares were issued at a price of $4.31 per share. The Company can draw down a further $8,870,000 over the remaining 15 months under the agreement. The Company intends to access financing under this agreement when appropriate to fund its research and development. The Company believes that funds from operations as well as from existing financing agreements will be sufficient to meet the Company’s cash requirements for the next twelve months.

The Company used cash of $3,590,418 in operations in 2003 compared to $2,406,600 in 2002. The Company invested $294,917 in additional capital assets in the year ended December 31, 2003, consisting mostly of patent costs, compared to $398,538 in the same period in 2002.

32


YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

Results of Operations

Net losses for the period ended December 31, 2002 were $3,422,019, or $0.15 per share, compared to $3,049,504, or $0.14 per share, for the same period in 2001. The weighted, diluted, average number of common shares outstanding for the year ending December 31, 2002 were 22,965,668 compared to 21,995,694 for the same period in 2001.

Revenues

Revenues from sales amounted to $356,162 for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared with $235,288 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase is attributable principally to higher sales volumes for NicAlert™ (increase of 94%). In 2001, there were revenues also from License Fees ($97,403) and Research Contracts ($30,000), which were not repeated in 2002.

Expenses

Research and development expenditures were $1,706,086 for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared with $1,499,654 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase is attributable to higher spending in the development of the therapeutic products in the Company’s pipeline. In 2002, research tax credits amounted to $16,656 compared to $20,052 in 2001.

Marketing expenditures were $235,925 for the year ended December 31, 2002, in comparison to expenditures of $343,244 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease is attributable to reduced costs relating to marketing agreements.

General and administrative expenses amounted to $1,230,439 for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared with $1,087,326 in the year ended December 31, 2001, due primarily to increased Directors & Officers insurance premiums (increase of 240%).

The Company used cash of $2,406,600 in operations in 2002 compared to $2,595,201 in 2001. The Company invested $398,538 in additional capital assets in the year ended December 31, 2002, consisting mostly of patent costs, compared to $340,662 in the same period in 2001.

Research and Development, Patents and Licenses

See Item 4 – “Patents and Proprietary Information.”

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

Directors and Senior Management

Dr. Paul Averback, M.D., D.A.B.P., 53, President and Director since September 1995 and Chairman since June of 2001, is the founder of Nymox and the inventor of much of its initial technology. Prior to founding Nymox, Dr. Averback served as President of Nymox’s predecessor, DMS Pharmaceuticals Inc. He received his M.D. in 1975 and taught pathology at universities, including Cambridge University, England (1977-1980), during which time he initiated his research on Alzheimer’s disease. He has practiced medicine in numerous Canadian institutions as well as in private practice. Dr. Averback has published extensively in the scientific and medical literature.

33


Dr. Hans Black, MD, 50, Director since May 13, 1999, has a doctorate in medicine from McGill University, and has been Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of Interinvest Consulting Corporation, a Montreal-based global money management firm with offices in Toronto and Boston and affiliates in Bermuda and Zurich, for over twenty five years. Dr. Black appears regularly on the PBS network show, Nightly Business Report, and has been a guest lecturer at Harvard, Temple and McGill Universities. Dr. Black is a member of the boards of Fonds de Recherche de l’Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal and L’Opéra de Montréal, a member of the Advisory Council of The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University, and is a member of the board of the NASDAQ-listed Nymox Corporation. In addition, Dr. Black serves as chairman of the board of the Quebec-based food company, Les Aliments SoYummi Inc.

Jack Gemmell, 52, has been a Director since June, 2001 and is Nymox’s General Counsel and Chief Information Officer. He graduated from the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto in 1977 and was called to the bar in 1979. He practiced in private practice primarily in the area of litigation for over 19 years before joining Nymox in July, 1998.

Michael R. Sonnenreich, 66, Director since April 18, 2000, is a graduate of Harvard University Law School, and has been Senior Partner of Michael Sonnenreich, since 1973, Chairman and CEO of Kikaku America International for the past fifteen years, and President and CEO of Glocal Communications Corp. Ltd. of London for the past five years. He is also Vice Chairman of PharMa International Corporation of Tokyo, Director of Asset Advisory Services of Zurich, Member of the Board of Advisors of John Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and Member of the Board of Overseers of Tufts University Medical School. Mr. Sonnenreich has in the past been a Board Member or a Trustee of numerous important companies and universities, and has long-term involvements with many non-profit institutions, and served as President of the National Coordinating Council on Drug Education.

Professor Walter P. von Wartburg, 65, Director since April 18, 2000, is a partner in the private law practice of Law & Life Sciences in Basel, Switzerland, specializing in biotech and drug regulatory affairs. Prior to joining Law & Life Sciences, Professor von Wartburg spent 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry. Most recently, from 1996 to 1999, he was Chief Information Officer of Novartis and from 1990-1996, he was Chief of Staff of Ciba-Geigy (which merged with Sandor in 1996 to form Novartis). From 1980 to 1990, he was a member of the Executive Committee of Ciba-Geigy. He is a law graduate of the Universities of Basel, Paris, Princeton, Stanford and Harvard Law School; Member of the Basel Bar Association and Professor on public health policy at the Saint Gall Graduate School of Economics, Business and Public Administration. He is author of various books and articles on drug abuse, pharmaceutical legislation, biotechnology, issues management, communications and business administration. He is also the Founder-President of the Swiss Foundation for the Mentally Handicapped “PRO MENTE SANA;” Member of the National Advisory Board of the Bioethics Institute of the Johns Hopkins University and past Chairman of the Board of the University Hospital of Basel.

Michael Munzar, M.D., 50, Medical Director since June 1, 1996, received an M.D. from the Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, in 1979. He practiced medicine for over 15 years in a variety of institutional and private practice settings. He has a diverse medical background that includes most aspects of medical care, including geriatrics and psychiatry. He also has extensive business experience with the establishment, operation and management of medical facilities.

34


Mr. Roy M. Wolvin, 49, Secretary-Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer since September 1995. Prior to September 1995, Mr. Wolvin was Account Manager, private business, for a Canadian chartered bank. Mr. Wolvin holds a degree in Economics from the University of Western Ontario.

Mr. Brian Doyle, B.Sc., M.B.A., 49, Senior Manager Global Sales and Marketing since May 2003. He received his B.Sc. in Microbiology and Immunology from McGill University, in 1979. He worked in the Experimental Surgery department at McGill in cancer research, before completing his MBA at Concordia University, in 1983. He has wide sales, marketing and merchandising experience and spent the last 15 years at a technical sales representative firm, where he was National Sales Manager before joining Nymox.

Compensation

The table below provides compensation information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 for each executive officer of Nymox and for the directors and executive officers as a group.

Summary Compensation Table

Fiscal Year ending
Dec. 31, 2003

NAME AND PRINCIPAL OTHER CASH
POSITION SALARY COMPENSATION

Dr. Paul Averback
CAN$50,000 --
President and C.E.O (US$35,676)

Mr. Roy Wolvin
CAN$85,500 --
Secretary-Treasurer (US$61,006)

Mr. Jack Gemmell
CAN$99,890 --
General Counsel (US$71,173)

Dr. Michael Munzar
CAN$147,625 --
Medical Director (US$105,334)

Mr. Brian Doyle
CAN$104,262 --
Global Sales Manager (US$74,393)

All directors and senior
CAN$487,277 --
management as a group (US$347,582)

Nymox does not have written employment contracts with any of the senior management named above except Brian Doyle. Directors of Nymox, with the exception of the President and our General Counsel, are paid a fee of $1,000 for each board meeting attendance and are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with their office.

The Company does not have any pension plans or other type of plans providing retirement or similar benefits for senior management.

Board Practices

Directors are elected at each annual meeting for a term of office until the next annual meeting. Executive officers are appointed by the board of directors and serve at the pleasure of the board. Other than Dr. Averback, no other officer or director previously was affiliated with DMS Pharmaceuticals Inc.

35


There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer and any other director or executive officer.

Nymox does not have written contracts with any of the directors named above. The Company does not have any pension plans or other type of plans providing retirement or similar benefits for directors, nor any benefits upon termination of service as a director.

Nymox’s Audit Committee consists of three directors appointed by the Board who are independent of management and who are generally knowledgeable in financial and auditing matters. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is Hans Black, M.D.; the other members are Michael Sonnenreich and Walter von Wartburg.

The primary role of the Audit Committee is to provide independent oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing, and reporting practices of the Company with a particular focus on financial statements and financial reporting to shareholders.

Subject to shareholder approval, the Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the public accounting firm engaged to prepare or issue an audit report on the financial statements of the Company. It oversees all relationships between the Company and the auditor, including reviewing on an ongoing basis any non-audit services and special engagements that may impact the objectivity or independence of the auditors. The auditors report directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent auditors.

The Audit Committee meets at least four times a year to review with management and the independent auditors the company’s interim and year-end financial condition and results of operations. Its review includes an assessment of the adequacy of the internal accounting, bookkeeping and control procedures of the company.

The Audit Committee also has the responsibility for reviewing on an ongoing basis all material transactions between the company and its affiliates and other related parties such as officers, directors, other key management personnel, major shareholders and their close family members, affiliated companies or associated enterprises.

The Audit Committee has the power to conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the Committee’s scope of responsibilities, including the power and authority to retain and determine funding for independent counsel, accountants, or other advisors as it determines necessary to carry out its duties.

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee consists of the independent directors of the company. The Chairman of the Committee is Professor Walter von Wartburg; the other member s are Dr. Hans Black and Michael Sonnenreich.

The Committee establishes and reviews overall policy and structure with respect to compensation and employment matters, including the determination of compensation arrangements for directors, executive officers and key employees of the company. The Committee is also responsible for the administration and award of options to purchase shares pursuant to the company’s option and share purchase plans.

36


The Corporate Governance Committee consists of the independent directors of the Company. The Chairman of the Committee is Michael Sonnenreich; the other members are Dr. Hans Black and Professor Walter von Wartburg. This Committee has the general mandate of providing an independent and regular review of the management, business and affairs of the company, including the company’s corporate governance. This Committee also reviews and approves director nominations to ensure each nominee meets the requisite requirements under applicable corporate and securities laws, rules and regulations and otherwise possesses the skills, judgment and independence appropriate for a director of a public corporation.

Employees

In addition to the employees in its Maywood and St.-Laurent laboratories and offices, Nymox carries out its work with the assistance of an extensive group of research collaborators, out-sourced manufacturing teams, research suppliers, research institutions, service providers and research consultants. To help carrying out its marketing, Nymox has independent medical representatives detailing its products.

In its Maywood and St.-Laurent laboratories and offices, for the year 2003, the company employed on the average eighteen persons with fourteen in research and development and four in administration and marketing; for the year 2002, nineteen persons (fourteen in research and development and five in administration and marketing; and for the year 2001 twenty-one persons (fifteen in research and development and six in administration and marketing).

Share Ownership

As of May 31, 2004, the numbers of common shares owned or controlled by, and options granted to directors and senior officers of the Corporation were as follows:

Name Common Shares
Owned and
Controlled
Percentage
of Common
Shares Owned
Options
Vested
Options
Not Vested
Exercise
Price
Expiry Date
M/D/Y

Paul Averback, M.D
13,115,395 52.9% 500,000 $3.00 10/24/13

Hans Black, M.D
      25,000 *   25,000 $3.12 (C$4.50) 05/13/09
  25,000 $3.875 05/01/10
  40,000 10,000 $6.93 ((C$10.00) 05/01/10
  10,000 $4.70 06/15/10
  75,000 $4.33 11/13/11

Michael Sonnenreich
      89,650 * 100,000 $3.875 05/01/10
  75,000 $4.33 11/13/11

Walter von Wartburg
      72,000 * 100,000 $3.875 05/01/10
  75,000 $4.33 11/13/11

Jack Gemmell
      12,725 *   50,000 $6.93 (C$10.00) 01/22/09
  25,000 $3.875 05/01/10
  25,000 $1.93 04/22/11
  20,000 $2.62 09/09/13

Roy Wolvin
        5,000 *   10,000 $2.25 (C$3.25) 01/17/06
  10,000 $9.53 (C$13.75) 01/17/06

37


Name Common Shares
Owned and
Controlled
Percentage
of Common
Shares Owned
Options
Vested
Options
Not Vested
Exercise
Price
Expiry Date
M/D/Y
               
  10,000 $6.79 (C$9.80) 01/17/06
  20,000 $6.93 (C$10.00) 01/17/06
  20,000 $3.12 (C$4.50) 05/13/09
    5,000 $1.93 04/22/11
    5,000 $2.62 09/09/13

Michael Munzar
      56,425 *   50,000 $7.97 (C$11.50) 04/30/06
    5,000 $6.24 (C$9.00) 10/31/07
  40,000 $6.93 (C$10.00) 10/31/07
  20,000 $3.12 (C$4.50) 05/13/09
  50,000 $3.90 08/25/10
  35,000 $1.93 04/22/11
  20,000 $4.45 08/25/12
  20,000 $2.62 09/09/13

Brian Doyle
      10,000 *   10,000 40,000 $3.75 04/28/13

* Denotes less than 1%.

Options

Nymox has created a stock option plan for its key employees, its officers and directors and certain consultants. The board of directors of Nymox administers the plan. The board may grant options to purchase a specified number of common shares of Nymox to a designated individual. The total number of common shares to be optioned to any one individual cannot exceed 5% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares and the maximum number of common shares which may be optioned under the plan cannot exceed 2,500,000 shares without shareholder approval.

The board fixes the option price per share for common shares that are the subject of any option when it grants any such option. The option price cannot involve a discount to the market price when the option is granted. The period during which an option is exercisable shall not exceed 10 years from the date when the option is granted. The options may not be assigned, transferred or pledged and expire within three months of the termination of employment or office with the Company and six months of the death of an individual.

Legal Proceedings

In December 2000, an investment company, Amro International, S.A., served Nymox with a Statement of Claim filed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court File No. 00-CV-201587), claiming to be entitled to the issuance of 388,797 additional shares in accordance with repricing provisions contained in the March 2000 agreement between Amro and Nymox and to damages of $4 million for lost opportunity to sell these shares. Nymox believes that Amro’s interpretation of the repricing provisions in the March 2000 agreement is incorrect and that Amro’s damage claims are without merit. Nymox has filed a Statement of Defense and intends to defend the action vigorously. In October 2003, the Company filed an action against Amro, certain private investors, their agents and others in the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that the defendants, inter alia, violated federal securities laws, breached their contractual commitments and/or breached their fiduciary duties toward Nymox.

38


In March 2002, Dr. Fitzpatrick, a former employee, filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association concerning the termination of her employment with the company. She is claiming damages of up to $498,000.00 plus attorney’s fees and costs based upon alleged violations of New Jersey law and breach of an employment agreement. Subsequently, in October 2002, she filed a complaint in the New Jersey Superior Court concerning the termination of her employment with the Company. The complaint claims unspecified damages.

The Company believes these claims are without merit and intends to defend the matters vigorously.

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major Shareholders

The following table sets out as of May 31, 2004, the number of common shares owned and controlled by Dr. Paul Averback, the President and CEO of Nymox and a member of the Nymox board of directors, and by all directors and officers as a group.

Name of Shareholder
Number of Common Shares
owned by Shareholder

Percent of Class of
Common Shares


Dr. Paul Averback
13,115,395 52.9 %

All directors and officers as a group
13,386,195 54.0 %

In addition, as of May 31, 2004, Dr. Averback’s wife owned 848,172 common shares (3.4%).

The above shareholders have the same voting rights as all other shareholders. There has been no significant change in ownership for any of the persons listed above over the past three years.

Nymox does not know of any other shareholders that beneficially own or hold dispositive power over more than 5% of its shares.

According to information furnished to Nymox by the transfer agent for the common shares, as of May 31, 2004, total shares outstanding were 24,788,134. There were 235 holders of record of the common shares and 3,818 beneficial shareholders in total. Of these, 88 were holders of record of the common shares and 3,087 were beneficial shareholders with addresses in the United States and such holders owned an aggregate of 8,182,035 shares, representing 33.0 % of the outstanding shares of common stock.

Related Party Transactions

Research contract revenue in 2001 ($30,000) was funded by the Foundation for Nutritional Advancement. Michael Sonnenreich, a director and officer of the Foundation, is also a director of the Company.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank]

39






Consolidated Financial Statements of

NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL
CORPORATION

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
















40


[KPMG LLP LOGO]

KPMG LLP  
Chartered Accountants
2000 McGill College Avenue Telephone  (514) 840-2100
Suite 1900 Telefax  (514) 840-2187
Montreal (Quebec) H3A 3H8 www.kpmg.ca


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated statements of operations, deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

Canadian generally accepted accounting principles vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Montréal, Canada

February 27, 2004 (except as for note 15 (a)),
   which is as of March 10, 2004)




41


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Financial Statements  

     Consolidated Balance Sheets
43 

     Consolidated Statements of Operations
44 

     Consolidated Statements of Deficit
45 

     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
46 

     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
47 












42


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2003 and 2002
(in US dollars)


2003 2002

Assets            

Current assets:
   
     Cash     $ 605,603   $ 660,629  
     Accounts receivable       27,503     101,364  
     Research tax credits receivable       33,019     47,165  
     Inventories       66,547     53,208  
     Prepaid expenses       15,000     --  

        747,672     862,366  

Long-term security deposit
      17,500     17,500  

Long-term receivables (note 6)
      70,000     70,000  

Property and equipment (note 3)
      133,161     185,293  

Patents and intellectual property (note 4)
      3,154,243     3,223,498  


 
    $ 4,122,576   $ 4,358,657  



Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
   

Current liabilities:
   
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     $ 1,218,234   $ 870,925  
     Notes payable (note 5)       500,000     544,872  
     Deferred revenue       5,930     55,930  

        1,724,164     1,471,727  

Non-controlling interest (note 6)
      800,000     800,000  

Shareholders' equity:
   
     Share capital (note 7)       32,503,600     28,407,600  
     Warrants and options       336,438     336,438  
     Additional paid-in capital       85,200     85,200  
     Deficit       (31,326,826 )   (26,742,308 )

        1,598,412     2,086,930  

Commitments and contingencies (note 8)
   
Subsequent events (note 15)    

      $ 4,122,576   $ 4,358,657  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

On behalf of the Board:

/s/ Paul Averback, MD      Director

/s/ Hans Black, MD     Director

43


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)


2003 2002 2001



Revenues:
               
     Sales     $ 199,217   $ 356,162   $ 235,288  
     License fees       --     --     97,403  
     Research contracts       --     --     30,000  
     Interest       915     5,586     17,918  

        200,132     361,748     380,609  


Expenses:
   
     Research and development       2,510,051     1,706,086     1,499,654  
     Less research tax credits       (33,019 )   (16,656 )   (20,052 )

        2,477,032     1,689,430     1,479,602  
     General and administrative       1,326,618     1,230,439     1,087,326  
     Marketing       197,435     235,925     343,244  
     Cost of sales       123,463     216,637     131,904  
     Depreciation of property and equipment       38,774     44,710     54,028  
     Amortization of patents and intellectual    
       property       370,268     352,559     327,554  
     Interest and bank charges       30,241     46,967     6,455  

        4,563,831     3,816,667     3,430,113  
     Gain on disposal of property and equipment       --     (32,900 )   --  

        4,563,831     3,783,767     3,430,113  

Net loss     $ (4,363,699 ) $ (3,422,019 ) $ (3,049,504 )


 

Basic and diluted loss per share (note 10)     $ (0.18 ) $ (0.15 ) $ (0.14 )


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.






44


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Deficit

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)


2003 2002 2001

Deficit, beginning of year     $ (26,742,308 ) $ (23,153,447 ) $ (19,982,999 )
Net loss       (4,363,699 )   (3,422,019 )   (3,049,504 )
Share issue costs       (220,819 )   (166,842 )   (120,944 )

Deficit, end of year     $ (31,326,826 ) $ (26,742,308 ) $ (23,153,447 )


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.











45


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)


2003 2002 2001


Cash flows from operating activities:
               
     Net loss     $ (4,363,699 ) $ (3,422,019 ) $ (3,049,504 )
     Adjustments for:    
         Depreciation of property and equipment       38,774     44,710     54,028  
         Amortization of patents and intellectual    
           property       370,268     352,559     327,554  
         Write-off of property and equipment       15,307     --     250  
         Gain on disposal of property    
           and equipment       --     (32,900 )   --  
         Services paid with common shares       --     32,420     --  
         Write-down of deferred share issuance costs       --     106,195     87,263  
     Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    
         Accounts receivable       73,861     (48,905 )   (20,942 )
         Research tax credits receivable       14,146     (16,656 )   (20,052 )
         Inventories       (13,339 )   (35,641 )   (13,242 )
         Prepaid expenses       (15,000 )   37,500     12,500  
         Accounts payable and accrued liabilities       339,264     575,532     (28,381 )
         Deferred revenue       (50,000 )   605     55,325  

        (3,590,418 )   (2,406,600 )   (2,595,201 )

Cash flows from financing activities:
   
     Proceeds from issuance of share capital       4,096,000     2,995,525     2,554,254  
     Share issue costs       (220,819 )   (166,842 )   (91,890 )
     Proceeds from notes payable       300,000     200,000     396,775  
     Repayment of notes payable       (344,872 )   (51,903 )   --  

        3,830,309     2,976,780     2,859,139  

Cash flows from investing activities:
   
     Additions to property and equipment       (1,949 )   (12,919 )   (2,687 )
     Additions to patent costs       (292,968 )   (418,519 )   (337,975 )
     Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment       --     32,900     --  

        (294,917 )   (398,538 )   (340,662 )

Net (decrease) increase in cash       (55,026 )   171,642     (76,724 )

Cash, beginning of year
      660,629     488,987     565,711  

Cash, end of year     $ 605,603   $ 660,629   $ 488,987  


Supplemental disclosure to statements of cash flows:
   
     (a) Interest paid     $ 30,241   $ 46,967   $ 6,455  
     (b) Non-cash transactions:    
              Amortization of deferred share    
                issue costs charged to deficit       --     --     29,054  
              Shares issued for services       --     32,420     --  
              Additions to patent costs included in    
                accounts payable and accrued liabilities    
                at year-end       182,145     174,100     --  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

46


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



1. Business activities:

  Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Corporation”), incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act, including its subsidiaries, Nymox Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Serex Inc. of New Jersey, is a biopharmaceutical corporation which specializes in the research and development of products for the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. The Corporation is currently marketing AlzheimAlert TM , a urinary test that aids physicians in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The Corporation also markets NicAlert TM and TobacAlert TM , tests that use urine or saliva to detect use of tobacco products. The Corporation is also developing therapeutics for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, new treatments for benign prostate hyperplasia, and new anti-bacterial agents for the treatment of urinary tract and other bacterial infections in humans, including a treatment for E-coli O157:H7 bacterial contamination in meat and other food and drink products.

  Since 1989, the Corporation’s activities and resources have been primarily focused on developing certain pharmaceutical technologies. The Corporation is subject to a number of risks, including the successful development and marketing of its technologies. In order to achieve its business plan and the realization of its assets and liabilities in the normal course of operations, the Corporation anticipates the need to raise additional capital and/or achieve sales and other revenue generating activities. Management believes that funds from operations as well as existing financing facilities will be sufficient to meet the Corporation’s requirements for the next year.

  The Corporation is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market.

2. Significant accounting policies:

  (a) Consolidation:

  The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation have been prepared under Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of its US subsidiaries, Nymox Corporation and Serex Inc. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

  Consolidated financial statements prepared under US GAAP would differ in some respects from those prepared in Canada. A reconciliation of earnings and shareholders’ equity reported in accordance with Canadian GAAP and with US GAAP is presented in note 12.

  (b) Inventories:

  Inventories consist of finished goods and are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined on the basis of weighted average cost.

47


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



2. Significant accounting policies (continued):

  (c) Property and equipment, patents and intellectual property:

  Property and equipment, patents and intellectual property are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method at the following rates:


Asset Rate


Laboratory equipment
20%
Computer equipment 20%
Office equipment and fixture 20%
Intellectual property rights 10%
   


  Direct costs incurred in connection with securing the patents are capitalized. Patents are being amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their economic useful lives or their legal terms of existence ranging from 17 to 20 years.

  Management reviews the unamortized balance of property and equipment, patents and intellectual property whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimates of non-discounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount.

  (d) Revenue recognition:

  Revenue from product sales is recognized when the product or service has been delivered or obligations as defined in the agreement are performed. Revenue from research contracts is recognized at the time research activities are performed under the agreement. Revenue from license fees, royalties and milestone payments is recognized upon the fulfillment of all obligations under the terms of the related agreement. These agreements may include upfront payments to be received by the Corporation. Upfront payments are recognized as revenue on a systematic basis over the period that the related services or obligations as defined in the agreement are performed. Interest is recognized on an accrual basis.

  Deferred revenue represents amounts billed to and received from customers in advance of revenue recognition.

48


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



2. Significant accounting policies (continued):

  (e) Research and development expenditures:

  Research expenditures, net of research tax credits, are expensed as incurred. Development expenditures, net of tax credits, are expensed as incurred, except if they meet the criteria for deferral in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

  (f) Foreign currency translation:

  The Corporation’s measurement currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities of the Canadian and foreign operations denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Other assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar are translated at the exchange rates prevailing when the assets were acquired or the liabilities incurred. Revenues and expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar are translated at the average exchange rate prevailing during the year, except for depreciation and amortization which are translated at the same rates as those used in the translation of the corresponding assets. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the translation are included in the determination of net earnings.

  Foreign exchange gains included in the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2003 amounted to $16,615 (2002 — $3,315; 2001 — $15,910).

  (g) Stock-based compensation plan:

  For stock-based employee compensation awards, the Company follows the settlement method of accounting. Under this method, no compensation expense is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations when stock options are issued to employees. Any consideration received from the plan participants upon exercise of stock options is credited to share capital. All stock-based payments to non-employees, and employee awards that are direct awards of stock, call for settlement in cash or other assets, or are stock appreciation rights that call for settlement by the issuance of equity instruments, granted on or after January 1, 2002, are accounted for using the fair value method.

  The Company discloses the pro forma effect of accounting for all stock-based awards granted to employees after January 1, 2002 under the fair value based method (refer to note 10).

49


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



2. Significant accounting policies (continued):

  (h) Income taxes:

  The Corporation accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on “temporary differences” (differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the assets and liabilities), and are measured using the currently enacted, or substantively enacted, tax rates and laws expected to apply when these differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded against any future income tax asset if it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized.

  (i) Earnings per share:

  Basic earnings per share are determined using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed in a manner consistent with basic earnings per share except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding options and warrants were exercised and that the proceeds from such exercises were used to acquire shares of common stock at the average market price during the reporting period.

  (j) Guarantees:

  On January 1, 2003, the Corporation adopted the new recommendations of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”), Accounting Guideline 14, Disclosure of Guarantees which clarifies disclosure requirements for certain guarantees. The guideline does not provide guidance on the measurement and recognition of a guarantor’s liability for obligations under guarantees. The guideline defines a guarantee to be a contract (including an indemnity) that contingently requires the Corporation to make payments to a third party based on (i) changes in an underlying interest rate, foreign exchange rate, equity or commodity instrument, index or other variable, that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity security of the counterparty, (ii) failure of another party to perform under an obligating agreement or (iii) failure of another party to pay its indebtedness when due.

  The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

50


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



2. Significant accounting policies (continued):

  (k) Use of estimates:

  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include estimating the useful lives of long-lived assets, including property and equipment and intangible assets, as well as estimating the recoverability of research tax credits receivable and future tax assets. The reported amounts and note disclosure are determined to reflect the most probable set of economic conditions and planned courses of action. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

3. Property and equipment:


2003


 
Cost Accumulated
depreciation
and amortization
Net book
value


     Laboratory equipment
    $ 622,525   $ 501,640   $ 120,885  
     Computer equipment       18,445     15,093     3,352  
     Office equipment and fix       88,949     80,025     8,924  

      $ 729,919   $ 596,758   $ 133,161  

 

2002


 
Cost Accumulated
depreciation
and amortization
Net book
value

     Laboratory equipment     $ 620,576   $ 471,662   $ 148,914  
     Computer equipment       73,043     47,807     25,236  
     Office equipment and fix       88,949     77,806     11,143  

      $ 782,568   $ 597,275   $ 185,293  


51


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



4. Patents and intellectual property:


2003


 
Cost Accumulated
amortization
Net book
value


     Patent costs
    $ 2,380,009   $ 550,898   $ 1,829,111  
     Intellectual property rights acq       2,222,661     897,529     1,325,132  

      $ 4,602,670   $ 1,448,427   $ 3,154,243  


 

2002


 
Cost Accumulated
amortization
Net book
value


     Patent costs
    $ 2,078,996   $ 401,486   $ 1,677,510  
     Intellectual property rights acq       2,222,661     676,673     1,545,988  

      $ 4,301,657   $ 1,078,159   $ 3,223,498  


5. Notes payable:


2003 2002

Note payable, bearing interest at the prime rate plus 2%, due on or            
   before January 1, 2004; repaid in 2003     $ --   $ 44,872  
Notes payable, bearing interest at the prime rate plus 2%, due on or            
   before July 31, 2004       500,000     500,000  

      $ 500,000   $ 544,872  


  During the year, the maturity dates of notes payable in the amount of $200,000 outstanding at December 31, 2002 were extended from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004. In addition, the Corporation issued notes payable in the amount of $300,000, bearing interest at prime rate plus 2% and due on or before July 31, 2004.

52


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



6. Non-controlling interest:

  Non-controlling interest includes redeemable, convertible preferred shares of Serex in the amount of $800,000. Up to 50% of the preferred shares are redeemable at any time at the option of the preferred shareholders for their issue price, subject to holders with at least 51% of the face value of the preferred shares asking for redemption and sufficient funds available in Serex. The preferred shares are also convertible into common shares of Serex at a price of $3.946 per share.

  The long-term receivables are due from the preferred shareholders and will be settled when the preferred shares are redeemed.

7. Share capital:


2003 2002

Authorized:            
   An unlimited number of common shares    

Issued and outstanding:
   
   24,401,159 common shares (2002 - 23,020,954 shares)     $ 32,503,600   $ 28,407,600  


  (a) Changes in the Corporation’s outstanding common shares are presented below:


Shares Dollars


Issued and outstanding, December 31, 2001
      22,297,525   $ 25,376,557  

Issue of common shares under private
   
   placements (b)       714,574     2,995,525  

Issued to acquire additional shares of Serex (b)
      932     3,098  

Issued in exchange for services (b)
      7,923     32,420  

Balance, December 31, 2002       23,020,954     28,407,600  

Issue of common shares for cash under
   
   common stock private purchase agreements (b) (c)       1,280,205     3,890,000  

Issue of common shares pursuant to exercise of war
      100,000     206,000  

Balance, December 31, 2003       24,401,159   $ 32,503,600  


53


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



7. Share capital (continued):

  (b) Private placements and other:

  In 2003, the Corporation completed private placements for 1,280,205 common shares and received aggregate proceeds of $3,890,000. In 2002, the Corporation completed private placements for 714,574 common shares and received aggregate proceeds of $2,995,525. The share issue costs related to these private placements have been charged against the deficit.

  In 2002, the Corporation also issued 932 common shares and 574 Series J warrants to purchase an additional 5,000 shares of Serex, Inc. that it did not already own. The Corporation since then owns approximately 98% of Serex, Inc. The warrants are exercisable at $3.70 per share and expire on July 31, 2005. In addition, in 2002, the Corporation issued 7,923 common shares for certain services totalling $32,420.

  (c) Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement:

  In January 2003, the Corporation entered into a Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement with an investment company (the “Purchaser”) that establishes the terms and conditions for the purchase of common shares by the Purchaser. In August 2003, this agreement was terminated and a new agreement was concluded with the Purchaser. In general, the Corporation can, at its discretion, require the Purchaser to purchase up to $12 million (previously $5 million) of common shares over a twenty-four-month period based on notices given by the Corporation.

  The number of shares to be issued in connection with each notice shall be equal to the amount specified in the notice divided by 97% of the average price of the Corporation’s common shares for the five days preceding the giving of the notice. The maximum amount of each notice is $500,000 and the minimum amount is $150,000. The Corporation may terminate the agreement before the 24-month term if it has issued at least $8 million of common shares under the agreement.

  In 2003, the Corporation issued 1,280,205 common shares to the Purchaser for aggregate proceeds of $3,890,000 under the agreements. At December 31, 2003, the Corporation can require the Purchaser to purchase up to $10,470,000 of common shares over the remaining 19 months of the agreement.

54


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



7. Share capital (continued):

  (d) Warrants:

  The Corporation has issued the following warrants to purchase common shares:


Warrants Exercise
price per
share
Issued Exercised
to date
Expired Outstanding at
December 31,
2003
Expiry


Series E
    $ 4.53     200,000     --     --     200,000     November 30, 2004  
Series F     $ 4.06     160,000     --     --     160,000     November 30, 2004  
Series G     $ 3.70     115,662     --     --     115,662     January 8, 2005  
Series H     $ 9.38     66,667     --     --     66,667     March 6, 2004  
Series I     $ 7.81     26,667     --     --     26,667     March 6, 2004  
Series J     $ 3.70     42,864     --     --     42,864     July 31, 2005  
Series K     $ 2.06     100,000     100,000     --     --     --  

              711,860     100,000     --     611,860      


  In February 2003, the Corporation issued 100,000 common shares pursuant to the exercise of Series K warrants and received proceeds of $206,000.

  (e) Stock options:

  The Corporation has established a stock option plan (the “Plan”) for its key employees, its officers and directors, and certain consultants. The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. The Board may from time to time designate individuals to whom options to purchase common shares of the Corporation may be granted, the number of shares to be optioned to each, and the option price per share. The option price per share cannot involve a discount to the market price at the time the option is granted. The total number of shares to be optioned to any one individual cannot exceed 5% of the total issued and outstanding shares and the maximum number of shares which may be optioned under the Plan cannot exceed 2,500,000 common shares without shareholder approval. Options under the Plan expire ten years after grant and vest either immediately or over periods up to five years.

55


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



7. Share capital (continued):

  (e) Stock options (continued):

  Changes in outstanding options were as follows for the last two fiscal periods:


Number Weighted average
exercise price


Balance, December 31, 2001
      1,640,000   $ 4.51  

Granted
      20,000     4.45  

Expired
      (6,000 )   3.30  

Balance, December 31, 2002       1,654,000     4.51  


Granted
      610,000     3.02  

Expired
      (133,500 )   5.06  

Balance, December 31, 2003       2,130,500   $ 4.05  





56


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



7. Share capital (continued):

  (e) Stock options (continued):

  At December 31, 2003, options outstanding and exercisable were as follows:


Options outstanding Options exercisable Exercise price per share Expiry date


 
10,000     10,000   $ 2.25     April 13, 2004  
  5,000     5,000     9.53     April 13, 2004  
  5,000     5,000     6.79     April 13, 2004  
  40,000     40,000     6.93     April 13, 2004  
  5,000     5,000     6.24     April 13, 2004  
  210,000     210,000     2.25     January 17, 2006  
  10,000     10,000     9.53     January 17, 2006  
  10,000     10,000     6.79     January 17, 2006  
  20,000     20,000     6.93     January 17, 2006  
  100,000     100,000     7.97     April 30, 2006  
  10,000     10,000     11.60     August 13, 2006  
  10,000     10,000     6.24     August 13, 2006  
  30,000     30,000     6.93     August 13, 2006  
  5,000     5,000     6.24     October 31, 2007  
  40,000     40,000     6.93     October 31, 2007  
  7,500     7,500     6.41     December 19, 2007  
  50,000     50,000     6.93     January 22, 2009  
  2,000     2,000     6.41     March 23, 2009  
  67,000     67,000     3.12     May 13, 2009  
  75,000     75,000     3.12     June 1, 2009  
  251,500     251,500     3.88     May 1, 2010  
  50,000     30,000     6.93     May 1, 2010  
  10,000     10,000     4.70     June 15, 2010  
  2,000     2,000     4.00     July 13, 2010  
  10,000     10,000     3.20     August 14, 2010  
  5,000     5,000     3.15     August 16, 2010  
  50,000     50,000     3.90     August 25, 2010  
  10,000     10,000     2.21     January 16, 2011  
  70,500     70,500     1.93     April 23, 2011  
  2,000     2,000     3.75     October 1, 2011  
  100,000     60,000     4.00     November 1, 2011  
  3,000     3,000     4.20     November 8, 2011  
  225,000     225,000     4.33     November 13, 2011  
  20,000     20,000     4.45     August 25, 2012  
  50,000     10,000     3.75     April 28, 2013  
  60,000     60,000     2.62     September 9, 2013  
  500,000     500,000     3.00     October 24, 2013  

  2,130,500     2,030,500   $ 4.05      


57


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



8. Commitments and contingencies:

  (a) Operating leases:

  Minimum lease payments under operating leases that were entered into by the Corporation for the next four years are as follows:


2004     $ 216,000  
2005       96,000  
2006       7,000  
2007       5,000  

      $ 324,000  


  (b) Research funding agreement:

  The Corporation is committed to make research grants to an unrelated medical facility in the U.S. in the aggregate amount of approximately $230,000 in 2004. Under this agreement, the medical facility benefits from research funding and collaboration from the Corporation and is entitled to royalties based on a percentage of sales of any commercialized product derived from this research.

  (c) Contingencies:

  Litigation:

  A shareholder has served the Corporation with a Statement of Claim filed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice claiming to be entitled to the issuance of 388,797 additional shares in accordance with repricing provisions contained in a 2000 private placement agreement and to damages of $4,000,000 for lost opportunity to sell these shares. The Corporation believes that the shareholder’s interpretation of the repricing provisions in the March 2000 agreement is incorrect and intends to defend the action vigorously. Accordingly, no provision related to this matter has been recorded in these financial statements. In October 2003, the Corporation filed an action against the shareholder, certain private investors, their agents and others in the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that the defendants, inter alia, violated federal securities laws, breached their contractual commitments and/or breached their fiduciary duties toward the Corporation.

58


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



8. Commitments and contingencies (continued):

  (c) Contingencies (continued):

  In March 2002, a former employee filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association concerning the termination of her employment with the Corporation. The employee is claiming damages of up to $498,000 plus attorney’s fees and costs, based upon alleged violations of New Jersey law and breach of an employment agreement. Subsequently, in October 2002, the former employee filed a complaint in the New Jersey Superior Court concerning the termination of her employment with the Corporation. The complaint claims unspecified damages. The Corporation believes these claims are without merit and intends to defend the matter vigorously. Accordingly, no provision related to this matter has been recorded in these financial statements.

9. Income taxes:

  Details of the components of income taxes are as follows:


2003 2002 2001


Loss before income taxes:
               
    Canadian operations     $ (3,579,335 ) $ (2,660,160 ) $ (2,257,157 )
    U.S. operations       (784,364 )   (761,859 )   (792,347 )

        (4,363,699 )   (3,422,019 )   (3,049,504 )

Basic income tax rate
      33 %   35 %   37 %

Income tax recovery at statutory rates       (1,445,000 )   (1,203,000 )   (1,128,000 )

Adjustments in income taxes resulting from:
   
    Non-recognition of losses and other    
      unclaimed deductions       1,445,000     1,203,000     1,128,000  

Income taxes     $ --   $ --   $ --  


59


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



9. Income taxes (continued):

  The income tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to the net future tax asset is presented below:


2003 2002


Future tax assets:
           
    Non-capital losses     $ 8,568,000   $ 7,265,000  
    Scientific research and experimental development    
      expenditures       878,000     675,000  
    Investment tax credits, net       390,000     290,000  
    Property and equipment and patents       196,000     113,000  
    Share issue costs       138,000     115,000  

        10,170,000     8,458,000  

    Less valuation allowance
      (9,371,000 )   (7,753,000 )

        799,000     705,000  

Future tax liabilities:
   
    Intellectual property rights       (413,000 )   (485,000 )
    Foreign exchange gains       (352,000 )   (220,000 )
    Other       (34,000 )   --  

        (799,000 )   (705,000 )

Net future tax asset     $ --   $ --  


  In assessing the realizability of future tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the future tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of future tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and tax planning strategies. The generation of future taxable income is dependent on the successful commercialization of its products and technologies.

60


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



9. Income taxes (continued):

  The Corporation has non-capital losses carried forward and accumulated scientific research and development expenditures which are available to reduce future years’ taxable income. These expire as follows:


Federal Provincial


Non-capital losses:
           
    2004     $ 1,690,000   $ 841,000  
    2005       2,392,000     2,392,000  
    2006       2,726,000     2,716,000  
    2007       3,284,000     3,223,000  
    2008       2,343,000     2,343,000  
    2009       2,888,000     2,856,000  
    2010       3,116,000     3,071,000  

Scientific research and development expenditures:
   
    (Indefinitely)       2,184,000     4,346,000  


  The Corporation also has investment tax credits available in the amount of approximately $568,000 to reduce future years’ Canadian federal taxes payable. These credits expire as follows:



2005
    $ 29,000  
2006       214,000  
2007       115,000  
2008       4,000  
2009       8,000  
2010       18,000  
2011       67,000  
2012       58,000  
2013       55,000  

      $ 568,000  

61


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



9. Income taxes (continued):

  In addition, the Corporation’s US subsidiaries have losses carried forward of approximately $9,349,000 which expire as follows:



2010
    $ 51,000  
2011       1,029,000  
2012       1,932,000  
2018       2,781,000  
2019       1,078,000  
2020       813,000  
2021       664,000  
2022       522,000  
2023       479,000  

      $ 9,349,000  


10. Earnings per share:

  (a) Basic and diluted earnings per share:

  A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:


2003 2002 2001


Basic:
               
     Basic weighted average number of    
       common shares outstanding       23,669,852     22,651,639     21,873,966  


     Basic loss per share
    $ (0.18 ) $ (0.15 ) $ (0.14 )


Diluted:
   
     Basic weighted average number    
       of common shares outstanding       23,669,852     22,651,639     21,873,966  
     Plus impact of stock options and    
       warrants (1)       102,006     314,029     121,728  


     Diluted common shares
      23,771,858     22,965,668     21,995,694  


     Diluted loss per share
    $ (0.18 ) $ (0.15 ) $ (0.14 )


  (1) The impact of these stock options and warrants is anti-dilutive because the Corporation incurred losses in 2003, 2002 and 2001.

62


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



10. Earnings per share (continued):

  (a) Basic and diluted earnings per share (continued):

  Excluded from the above calculations are 1,623,000 stock options and 453,334 warrants which were deemed to be anti-dilutive because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares (2002 — 1,186,500 options and 453,334 warrants; 2001 — 760,500 options and 293,334 warrants).

  (b) Stock-based compensation:

  If the fair value-based accounting method had been used to account for and measure stock-based compensation costs relating to exempt options and warrants issued to employees after January 1, 2002, the net loss and related loss per share figures would be as follows:


2003 2002


Reported net loss
    $ (4,363,699 ) $ (3,422,019 )
Pro forma adjustments to compensation expense       (494,964 )   (53,200 )

Pro forma net loss     $ (4,858,663 ) $ (3,475,219 )


Pro forma loss per share:
   
     Basic     $ (0.21 ) $ (0.15 )
     Diluted       (0.21 )   (0.15 )


  The weighted average fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:


2003 2002


Risk free interest rate
      4.27 %   4.49 %
Expected volatility       40 %   54 %
Expected life in years       5     5  
Dividend yield       0 %   0 %


63


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



10. Earnings per share (continued):

  (b) Stock-based compensation (continued):

  The following table summarizes the weighted average grant-date fair value per share for options granted during the year ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002:


Year Number of
options
Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value
per share


Exercise price per share equal to
      2002     20,000   $ 2.29  
  market price per share at date of grant       2003     60,000     1.11  

Exercise price per share greater than
   
  market price per share at date of grant       2003     550,000     0.89  


  Dividend yield was excluded from the calculation, since it is the present policy of the Corporation to retain all earnings to finance operations.

11. Financial instruments:

  (a) Foreign currency risk management:

  Effective January 1, 2000, the Corporation adopted the US dollar as its measurement currency because a substantial portion of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of its Canadian and US operations are denominated in US dollars. The Canadian operation also has transactions denominated in Canadian dollars, principally relating to salaries and rent. Fluctuations in the currency used for the payment of the Corporation’s expenses denominated in currencies other than the US dollar could cause unanticipated fluctuations in the Corporation’s operating results. The Corporation does not engage in the use of derivative financial instruments to manage its currency exposures.

  (b) Fair value disclosure:

  Fair value estimates are made as of a specific point in time using available information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and often cannot be determined with precision.

64


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



11. Financial instruments (continued):

  (b) Fair value disclosure (continued):

  The Corporation has determined that the carrying value of its short-term financial assets and liabilities approximates their fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of the long-term receivables cannot be determined because settlement is tied to the redemption of the preferred shares. See note 6.

  (c) Credit risk:

  Credit risk results from the possibility that a loss may occur from the failure of another party to perform according to the terms of the contract. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Corporation to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. Cash is maintained with a high-credit quality financial institution. For accounts receivable, the Corporation performs periodic credit evaluations and typically does not require collateral. Allowances are maintained for potential credit losses consistent with the credit risk, historical trends, general economic conditions and other information.

  (d) Interest rate risk:

  The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is as follows:


Cash Fixed interest rate 
Notes payable Floating interest rate 


12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences:

  (a) Consolidated statements of earnings:

  The reconciliation of earnings reported in accordance with Canadian GAAP and with U.S. GAAP is as follows:


2003 2002 2001

Net loss, Canadian GAAP     $ (4,363,699 ) $ (3,422,019 ) $ (3,049,504 )

Adjustments:
   
     Amortization of patents (i)       9,411     9,410     9,411  
     Stock-based compensation - options    
       granted to non-employees (ii)       (41,140 )   (41,140 )   (55,040 )

Net loss, U.S. GAAP     $ (4,395,428 ) $ (3,453,749 ) $ (3,095,133 )


Loss per share, U.S. GAAP
    $ (0.19 ) $ (0.15 ) $ (0.14 )


65


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (a) Consolidated statements of earnings (continued:)

  The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for purposes of determining basic and diluted loss per share are the same amounts as those for Canadian GAAP purposes.

  (b) Consolidated shareholders’ equity:

  The reconciliation of shareholders’ equity reported in accordance with Canadian GAAP and with U.S. GAAP is as follows:


2003 2002 2001

Shareholders' equity, Canadian GAAP     $ 1,598,412   $ 2,086,930   $ 2,644,748  

Adjustments:
   
     Amortization of patents (i)       (119,714 )   (129,125 )   (138,535 )
     Stock-based compensation - options    
       granted to non-employees (ii):    
         Cumulative compensation expense       (1,342,863 )   (1,301,723 )   (1,260,583 )
         Additional paid-in capital       1,395,426     1,354,286     1,313,146  
     Change in reporting currency (iii)       (62,672 )   (62,672 )   (62,672 )

        (129,823 )   (139,234 )   (148,644 )

Shareholders' equity, U.S. GAAP     $ 1,468,589   $ 1,947,696   $ 2,496,104  


  (i) In accordance with APB Opinion 17, Intangible Assets , the patents are amortized using the straight-line method over the legal life of the patents from the date the patent was secured. For Canadian GAAP purposes, certain patents were initially amortized by the Corporation commencing in the year of commercial production of the developed products.

  (ii) In accordance with FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , compensation related to the stock options granted to non-employees prior to January 1, 2002 has been recorded in the accounts based on the fair value of the stock options at the grant date. The fair value of the stock options was estimated as described in note 12 (d) (2).

66


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (b) Consolidated shareholders’ equity (continued):

  (iii) Change in reporting currency:

  The Corporation adopted the US dollar as its reporting currency effective January 1, 2000. For Canadian GAAP purposes, the financial information for 1999 has been translated into US dollars at the December 31, 1999 exchange rate. For United States GAAP reporting purposes, assets and liabilities for all years presented have been translated into US dollars at the ending exchange rate for the respective year and the statement of earnings at the average exchange rate for the respective year.

  (c) Consolidated comprehensive income:

  FAS 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income , requires the Corporation to report and display certain information related to comprehensive income for the Corporation. There were no adjustments to the net loss US GAAP required to reconcile to the comprehensive loss.

  (d) Other disclosures required by United States GAAP:

  (1) Development stage company:

  The Corporation is in the process of developing unique patented products which are subject to approval by the regulatory authorities. It has had limited revenues to date on the sale of its products under development. Accordingly, the Corporation is a development stage company as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7 and the following additional disclosures under US GAAP are provided:


Cumulative
since the date of
inception of
the Corporation
to December 31,
2003
Cumulative
since the date of
inception of
the Corporation
to December 31,
2002


Revenues:
           
    Sales     $ 1,223,443   $ 1,024,226  
    Interest revenue       508,569     507,654  
    License revenue       97,403     97,403  
    Research contract       30,000     30,000  

Expenses:
   
    Gross research and development expenditures       15,260,841     12,750,790  
    Other expenses       17,577,099     15,490,300  

Cash inflows (outflows):
   
    Operating activities       (27,800,421 )   (24,027,858 )
    Investing activities       (1,292,606 )   (1,179,834 )
    Financing activities       31,139,049     27,308,740  


67


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (d) Other disclosures required by United States GAAP (continued):

  (1) Development stage company (continued):

  The statement of shareholders’ equity since date of inception under US GAAP is presented below:


Number of
shares
Consi-
deration
Additional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
deficit
Total


Year ended July 31, 1990:
                       
    Common shares issued       2,500,000   $ 172,414   $ --   $ --   $ 172,414  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (109,241 )   (109,241 )

    Balance, July 31, 1990       2,500,000     172,414     --     (109,241 )   63,173  

Year ended July 31, 1991:
   
    Net loss       --     --     --     (21,588 )   (21,588 )
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     1,499     --     (950 )   549  

    Balance, July 31, 1991       2,500,000     173,913     --     (131,779 )   42,134  

Year ended July 31, 1992:
   
    Common shares issued       9,375     31,468     --     --     31,468  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (45,555 )   (45,555 )
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     (6,086 )   --     5,598     (488 )

    Balance, July 31, 1992       2,509,375     199,295     --     (171,736 )   27,559  

Year ended July 31, 1993:
   
    Common shares issued       201,250     159,944     --     --     159,944  
    Common shares cancelled       (500,000 )   --     --     --     --  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (38,894 )   (38,894 )
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     (13,994 )   --     12,830     (1,164 )

    Balance, July 31, 1993       2,210,625     345,245     --     (197,800 )   147,445  

Year ended July 31, 1994:
   
    Common shares issued       2,500     7,233     --     --     7,233  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (53,225 )   (53,225 )
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     (25,173 )   --     15,808     (9,365 )

    Balance, July 31, 1994       2,213,125     327,305     --     (235,217 )   92,088  

Year ended July 31, 1995:
   
    Common shares issued       78,078     303,380     --     --     303,380  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (285,910 )   (285,910 )
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     5,196     --     (7,221 )   (2,025 )

    Balance, July 31, 1995       2,291,203     635,881     --     (528,348 )   107,533  

Period ended December 31, 1995:
   
    Adjustment necessary to    
      increase the number of    
      common shares       12,708,797     --     --     --     --  

    Adjusted number of    
      common shares       15,000,000     635,881     --     (528,348 )   107,533  
    Common shares issued       2,047,082     2,997,284     --     --     2,997,284  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (1,194,226 )   (1,194,226 )
    Share issue costs       --     (153,810 )   --     --     (153,810 )
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     2,858     --     (6,328 )   (3,470 )

    Balance, December 31, 1995    
      carried forward       17,047,082     3,482,213     --     (1,728,902 )   1,753,311  


68


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (d) Other disclosures required by United States GAAP (continued):

  (1) Development stage company (continued):

  The statement of shareholders’ equity since date of inception under US GAAP is presented below (continued):


Number of
shares
Consi-
deration
Additional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
deficit
Total

Balance, December 31, 1995                        
  brought forward       17,047,082   $ 3,482,213   $ --   $ (1,728,902 ) $ 1,753,311  

Year ended December 31, 1996:
   
    Common shares issued       882,300     3,852,364     --     --     3,852,364  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (3,175,587 )   (3,175,587 )
    Share issue costs       --     (170,699 )   --     --     (170,699 )
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     434,145     --     434,145  
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     (16,769 )   (2,217 )   24,544     5,558  

Balance, December 31, 1996       17,929,382     7,147,109     431,928     (4,879,945 )   2,699,092  

Year ended December 31, 1997:
   
    Common shares issued       703,491     3,180,666     --     --     3,180,666  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (3,755,409 )   (3,755,409 )
    Share issue costs       --     (161,482 )   --     --     (161,482 )
    Capital stock subscription       --     352,324     --     --     352,324  
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     108,350     --     108,350  
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     (299,275 )   (21,578 )   325,364     4,511  

Balance, December 31, 1997       18,632,873     10,219,342     518,700     (8,309,990 )   2,428,052  


Year ended December 31, 1998:
   
    Common shares issued       1,095,031     5,644,638     --     --     5,644,638  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (4,979,562 )   (4,979,562 )
    Share issue costs       --     (54,131 )   --     --     (54,131 )
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     274,088     --     274,088  
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     (685,156 )   (43,750 )   720,173     (8,733 )

Balance, December 31, 1998       19,727,904     15,124,693     749,038     (12,569,379 )   3,304,352  

Year ended December 31, 1999:
   
    Common shares issued       275,900     969,253     --     --     969,253  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (3,409,166 )   (3,409,166 )
    Share issue costs       --     (35,041 )   --     --     (35,041 )
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     198,815     --     198,815  
    Cumulative translation adjustment       --     943,133     52,563     (884,178 )   111,518  

Balance, December 31, 1999       20,003,804     17,002,038     1,000,416     (16,862,723 )   1,139,731  

Year ended December 31, 2000:
   
    Common shares issued       1,373,817     5,909,340     --     --     5,909,340  
    Warrants and options       --     421,638     --     --     421,638  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (4,272,308 )   (4,272,308 )
    Share issue costs       --     (353,204 )   --     --     (353,204 )
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     257,690     --     257,690  

Balance, December 31, 2000    
  carried forward       21,377,621     22,979,812     1,258,106     (21,135,031 )   3,102,887  

69


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (d) Other disclosures required by United States GAAP (continued):

  (1) Development stage company (continued):

  The statement of shareholders’ equity since date of inception under US GAAP is presented below (continued):


Number of
shares
Consi-
deration
Additional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
deficit
Total

Balance, December 31, 2000                        
  brought forward       21,377,621   $ 22,979,812   $ 1,258,106   $ (21,135,031 ) $ 3,102,887  

Year ended December 31, 2001:
   
    Common shares issued       919,904     2,554,254     --     --     2,554,254  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (3,095,133 )   (3,095,133 )
    Share issue costs       --     (120,944 )   --     --     (120,944 )
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     55,040     --     55,040  

Balance, December 31, 2001       22,297,525     25,413,122     1,313,146     (24,230,164 )   2,496,104  

Year ended December 31, 2002:
   
    Common shares issued       723,429     3,031,043     --     --     3,031,043  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (3,453,749 )   (3,453,749 )
    Share issue costs       --     (166,842 )   --     --     (166,842 )
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     41,140     --     41,140  

Balance, December 31, 2002       23,020,954     28,277,323     1,354,286     (27,683,913 )   1,947,696  

Year ended December 31, 2003:
   
    Common shares issued       1,380,205     4,096,000     --     --     4,096,000  
    Net loss       --     --     --     (4,395,428 )   (4,395,428 )
    Share issue costs       --     (220,819 )   --     --     (220,819 )
    Stock-based compensation       --     --     41,140     --     41,140  

Balance, December 31, 2003       24,401,159   $ 32,152,504   $ 1,395,426   $ (32,079,341 ) $ 1,468,589  





70


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (d) Other disclosures required by United States GAAP (continued):

  (2) Stock-based compensation:

  For US GAAP purposes, the Corporation applies APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , in accounting for its stock option plan, and, accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for stock options granted to employees in these financial statements. As explained in note 12 (b), compensation cost has been recognized for stock options granted to non-employees. Had compensation cost been determined for stock options granted to employees based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plan consistent with the method of FASB Statement 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , the Corporation’s net earnings and loss per share would have been adjusted to the pro-forma amounts indicated below for US GAAP:


2003 2002 2001


Net loss
    As reported (US GAAP)     $ (4,395,428 ) $ (3,453,749 ) $ (3,095,133 )
    Deduct: stock-based    
    employee    
    compensation cost,    
    net of taxes of nil,    
    under SFAS 123       (662,994 )   (221,500 )   (251,969 )

    Pro-forma     $ (5,058,422 ) $ (3,675,249 ) $ (3,347,102 )


Loss per share
    As reported (US GAAP)     $ (0.19 ) $ (0.15 ) $ (0.14 )
    Pro-forma       (0.21 )   (0.16 )   (0.15 )


  The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.27% (2002 — 4.49%; 2001 — 5.49%), dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 40% (2002 — 54%; 2001 — 163%), and expected life of 5 years.




71


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (e) Recent accounting pronouncements:

  (i) Variable interest entities:

  In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FIN46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities . This interpretation provides guidance on the application of consolidation accounting principles to all entities. Its principles require an enterprise to determine whether an entity in which it has an interest is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), or an entity that is other than a VIE, to which the basic consolidation principles apply. An enterprise consolidates a VIE if that enterprise has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses if they occur, receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns if they occur, or both.

  FIN46R applies to financial statements of public companies that have an interest in VIEs (other than special-purpose entities for which the standard is already effective) for periods ending after March 15, 2004. Similar standards were issued in Canada, but are only effective for annual or interim periods beginning after November 1, 2004. The Company does not expect the adoption of these standards to have a material effect on its financial statements.

  (ii) Asset retirement obligations:

  These standards were established for the recognition, measurement and disclosures of liabilities for asset retirement obligations and the associated retirement cost. The standards apply to legal obligations associated with the retirements of a tangible long-lived asset that results from acquisition, development or normal operations. The standard requires an entity to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. An entity is subsequently required to allocate the asset retirement cost to expense using a systematic and rational method over its estimated life. The standards are effective in Canada and the U.S. for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.





72


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



12. Canadian/U.S. Reporting Differences (continued):

  (e) Recent accounting pronouncements (continued):

  In December 2002, CICA issued Handbook Section 3063, Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets and revised Section 3475, Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and Discontinued Operations. Together, these two Sections supersede the write-down and disposal provisions of Section 3061, Property, Plant and Equipment as well as Section 3475, Discontinued Operations . Section 3063 amends existing guidance and long-lived asset impairment measurement and establishes standards for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of the impairment of long-lived assets held for use by the Corporation. It requires that an impairment loss be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset to be held and used exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected from its use and disposal; the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Section 3475 provides a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. Section 3475 provides specified criteria for classifying an asset as held-for-sale to be measured at the lower of their carrying amounts or fair value, less costs to sell.

  Section 3475 also broadens the scope of businesses that qualify for reporting as discontinued operations to include any disposals of a component of an entity, which comprises operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Corporation, and changes the timing of recognizing losses on such operations. The new standards contained in Section 3063 on the impairment of long-lived assets held for use are applicable for years beginning on or after April 1, 2003. The revised standards contained in Section 3475 on disposal of long-lived assets and discontinued operations are applicable to disposal activities initiated by the Corporation’s commitment to a plan on or after May 1, 2003. The Corporation does not expect that the adoption of these standards will have a material effect on its financial statements.





73


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



13. Segment disclosures:

  The Corporation operates in one reporting segment — the research and development of products for the treatment of Alzheimer’s and other diseases. Geographic segment information is as follows:


Canada United
States


Revenues:
           
   2003     $ 3,231   $ 196,901  
   2002       6,327     355,421  
   2001       145,501     235,108  

Net loss:
   
   2003       (3,579,335 )   (784,364 )
   2002       (2,660,160 )   (761,859 )
   2001       (2,257,157 )   (792,347 )

Property and equipment, patents and intellectual property:
   
   2003       2,994,919     292,485  
   2002       3,102,806     305,985  

Total assets:
   
   2003       3,414,762     707,814  
   2002       3,791,072     567,585  


  Major customers:

  Customers that accounted for greater than 10% of revenues were as follows:


2003 2002 2001


Customer A
      N/A     33%   N/A  
Customer B       15%   21%   N/A  
Customer C       N/A     11%   N/A  
Customer D       25%   N/A     26%


14. Comparative figures:

  Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in the current year.

74


NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(in US dollars)



15. Subsequent events:

  (a) Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement:

  In January and February 2004, the Corporation issued 168,325 common shares for aggregate proceeds of $700,000 under the Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement referred to in note 7 (c). On March 10, 2004, the Corporation gave notice of exercise for an additional drawdown under the agreement of 100,402 common shares to be issued for aggregate proceeds of $500,000.

  (b) Exercise of warrants:

  In February 2004, the Corporation issued 16,953 common shares pursuant to a cashless exercise of 109,879 Series G warrants and 3,761 common shares pursuant to a cashless exercise of 18,850 Series J warrants.









75


ITEM 9. OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS

Nymox’s common shares trade on the NASDAQ Stock Market. Nymox’s common shares traded on the NASDAQ National Market from December 1, 1997 until September 16, 1999 when they began trading on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market. Nymox’s common shares also traded on the Montreal Exchange from December 18, 1995 until November 19, 1999.

The following tables set out the high and low reported trading prices of the common shares on the NASDAQ Stock Market during the periods indicated.

Annual High and Low Market Prices - Past Five Years
YEAR ANNUAL HIGH ANNUAL LOW
1999 $ 5.875 $2.500
2000 $10.563 $1.063
2001 $ 4.910 $1.750
2002 $ 5.750 $2.800
2003 $ 4.400 $2.360

Quarterly High and Low Market Prices - Past Two Years
YEAR QUARTERLY PERIOD HIGH SALES PRICE LOW SALES PRICE
2002 1st Quarter $4.410 $3.500
2nd Quarter $4.750 $2.810
3rd Quarter $5.750 $3.050
4th Quarter $4.500 $2.800
2003 1st Quarter $4.400 $3.310
2nd Quarter $3.990 $2.620
3rd Quarter $3.450 $2.390
4th Quarter $3.490 $2.360

Monthly High and Low Market Prices - Most Recent Six Months
DATE MONTHLY HIGH MONTHLY LOW

December, 2003
$3.490 $2.630
January, 2004 $4.620 $3.340
February, 2004 $4.930 $4.050
March, 2004 $5.390 $3.910
April, 2004 $4.920 $2.990
May, 2004 $3.630 $2.680

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Warrants Outstanding
Description Warrants Issued Exercise Price Expiry Date

Series E
200,000 $4.5315 Nov. 30, 2004
Series F 160,000 $4.0625 Nov. 30, 2004
Series G     5,783 $3.70     Jan. 8, 2005
Series J   19,713 $3.70     Jul. 31, 2005

The total number of shares subject to options at May 31, 2004 is 2,065,500, of which options representing 1,985,500 are currently exercisable. Of those, the total number of shares subject to options held by directors and officers of Nymox is 1,525,000 of which options representing 1,475,000 shares are currently exercisable.

76


There are no rights, warrants or options presently outstanding under which Nymox could issue additional common shares, with the exception of options enabling certain directors, employees and consultants of Nymox to acquire common shares under Nymox’s stock option plan and of warrants entitling the holders to acquire up to 385,496 common shares of Nymox as outlined in the above table.

Memorandum and Articles of Association

Bylaws And Articles Of Incorporation

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation as amended, which we refer to as our articles of incorporation, are on file with the Corporations Directorate of Industry Canada under Corporation Number 315235-9. Our articles of incorporation do not include a stated purpose and do not place any restrictions on the business that the company may carry on.

Directors

A director of our Company need not be a shareholder. In accordance with our bylaws and the Canada Business Corporations Act, at least 25% of our directors must be residents of Canada. In order to serve as a director, a person must be a natural person at least 18 years of age, of sound mind and not bankrupt. Neither our articles of incorporation or by-laws, nor the Canada Business Corporations Act, impose any mandatory retirement requirements for directors.

Our bylaws and the Canada Business Corporations Act authorize the directors from time to time to determine the remuneration for their services. There is no requirement for an independent quorum.

A director who is a party to, or who is a director or officer of or has a material interest in any person who is a party to, a material contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction with our company must disclose to the company the nature and extent of his or her interest at the time and in the manner provided by the Canada Business Corporations Act. The Canada Business Corporations Act prohibits such a director from voting on any resolution to approve the contract or transaction unless the contract or transaction:

  is an arrangement by way of security for money lent to or obligations undertaken by the director for the benefit of the Company or an affiliate;

  relates primarily to his or her remuneration as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or an affiliate;

  is for indemnity or insurance for director's liability as permitted by the Act; or

  is with an affiliate.

Our board of directors may, on behalf of the Company and without authorization of our shareholders:

  borrow money upon the credit of the Company;

  issue, reissue, sell or pledge debt obligations of the Company;

  give a guarantee on behalf of the Company to secure performance of an obligation of any person; and

  mortgage, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise create a security interest in all or any property of the Company, owned or subsequently acquired, to secure any obligation of the Company.

The Canada Business Corporations Act prohibits the giving of a guarantee to any shareholder, director, officer or employee of the Company or of an affiliated corporation or to an associate of any such person for any purpose or to any person for the purpose of or in connection with a purchase of a share issued or to be issued by the Company or its affiliates, where there are reasonable grounds for believing that the Company is or, after giving the guarantee, would be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due, or the realizable value of the Company’s assets in the form of assets pledged or encumbered to secure a guarantee, after giving the guarantee, would be less than the aggregate of the Company’s liabilities and stated capital of all classes.

77


These borrowing powers may be varied by the Company’s bylaws or its articles of incorporation. However, our bylaws and articles of incorporation do not contain any restrictions on or variations of these borrowing powers.

Common Shares

Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of an unlimited number of common shares. They do not authorize the issuance of any other class of shares.

The holders of the common shares of our Company are entitled to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of the shareholders of our Company and have one vote for each common share held at all meetings of the shareholders of our Company. Our directors are elected at each annual meeting of shareholders and do not stand for reelection at staggered intervals.

The holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends and our Company will pay dividends, as and when declared by our board of directors, out of moneys properly applicable to the payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as our board of directors may from time to time determine, and all dividends which our board of directors may declare on the common shares shall be declared and paid in equal amounts per share on all common shares at the time outstanding.

In the event of the dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other distribution of assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of winding up its affairs, the holders of the common shares will be entitled to receive the remaining property and assets of the Company.

There are no redemption provisions and no liability for further capital calls associated with the Company’s common stock.

Action Necessary To Change Rights Of Shareholders

In order to change the rights of our shareholders, we would need to amend our articles of incorporation to effect the change. Such an amendment would require the approval of holders of two-thirds of the shares cast at a duly called special meeting. For certain amendments such as those creating a class of preferred shares, a shareholder is entitled to dissent in respect of such a resolution amending our articles and, if the resolution is adopted and the Company implements such changes, demand payment of the fair value of its shares.

Meetings Of Shareholders

An annual meeting of shareholders is held each year for the purpose of considering the financial statements and reports, electing directors, appointing auditors and for the transaction of other business as may be brought before the meeting. The board of directors has the power to call a special meeting of shareholders at any time.

Notice of the time and place of each meeting of shareholders must be given not less than 21 days, nor more than 50 days, before the date of each meeting to each director, to the auditor and to each shareholder who at the close of business on the record date for notice is entered in the securities register as the holder of one or more shares carrying the right to vote at the meeting. Notice of meeting of shareholders called for any other purpose other than consideration of the minutes of an earlier meeting, financial statements and auditor’s report, election of directors and reappointment of the incumbent auditor, must state the nature of the business in sufficient detail to permit the shareholder to form a reasoned judgment on and must state the text of any special resolution or by-law to be submitted to the meeting.

78


The only persons entitled to be present at a meeting of shareholders are those entitled to vote, the directors of the Company and the auditor of the Company. Any other person may be admitted only on the invitation of the chairman of the meeting or with the consent of the meeting. In circumstances where a court orders a meeting of shareholders, the court may direct how the meeting may be held, including who may attend the meeting.

Limitations On Right To Own Securities

Neither Canadian law nor our articles or by-laws limit the right of a nonresident to hold or vote our shares, other than as provided in the Investment Canada Act (the “Investment Act”), as amended by the World Trade Organization Agreement Implementation Act. The Investment Act generally prohibits implementation of a direct reviewable investment by an individual, government or agency thereof, corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is not a “Canadian,” as defined in the Investment Act (a “non-Canadian”), unless, after review, the minister responsible for the Investment Act is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. An investment in our shares by a non-Canadian (other than a “WTO Investor,” as defined below) would be reviewable under the Investment Act if it were an investment to acquire direct control of our Company, and the value of the assets of our Company were CDN$5.0 million or more (provided that immediately prior to the implementation of the investment our Company was not controlled by WTO Investors). An investment in our shares by a WTO Investor (or by a non-Canadian other than a WTO Investor if immediately prior to the implementation of the investment our Company was controlled by WTO Investors) would be reviewable under the Investment Act if it were an investment to acquire direct control of our Company and the value of the assets of our Company equaled or exceeded a specified amount (the “Review Threshold”). The Review Threshold in 2002 was CDN$218 million and in 2003 was CDN$223 million. For 2004 the Review Threshold is CDN$237 million. A non-Canadian, whether a WTO Investor or otherwise, would be deemed to acquire control of our Company for purposes of the Investment Act if he or she acquired a majority of our shares. The acquisition of less than a majority, but at least one-third of our shares, would be presumed to be an acquisition of control of our Company, unless it could be established that we were not controlled in fact by the acquirer through the ownership of our shares. In general, an individual is a WTO Investor if he or she is a “national” of a country (other than Canada) that is a member of the World Trade Organization (“WTO Member”) or has a right of permanent residence in a WTO Member. A corporation or other entity will be a “WTO Investor” if it is a “WTO investor-controlled entity,” pursuant to detailed rules set out in the Investment Act. The United States is a WTO Member. Certain transactions involving our shares would be exempt from the Investment Act, including:

(a) an acquisition of our shares if the acquisition were made in the ordinary course of that person’s business as a trader or dealer in securities;

(b) an acquisition of control of our Company in connection with the foreclosure of a security interest granted for a loan or other assistance and not for any purpose related to the provisions the Investment Act; and

(c) an acquisition of control of our Company by reason of an amalgamation, consolidation or corporate reorganization, following which the direct or indirect control in fact of our Company, through ownership of voting interests, remains unchanged.

Change of Control

There are no provisions of our bylaws or articles of incorporation that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company. Our bylaws do not contain a provision governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.

79


Material Contracts

The following is a summary of the material contracts to which the Company is a party, for the two years ended May 31, 2004 .

1. The Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Lorros-Greyse Investments Limited August 25, 2003. This agreement established a financing commitment for $12 million over a twenty-four month period starting August 25, 2003. The terms and conditions of this commitment are further described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section in Item 5 of this report.

2. The Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Lorros-Greyse Investments Limited January 27, 2003. This agreement established a financing commitment for $5 million over a twenty-four month period starting January 27, 2003. This agreement was replaced by the new agreement above on August 25, 2003.

3. The Common Stock Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Jaspas Investments Limited November 1, 1999. These agreements expired in January 2003. The terms and conditions of these agreements are further described in our F-1 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on November 9, and declared effective on December 4, 2001.

4. The Research and License Agreement between Rhode Island Hospital and Nymox Corporation dated May 20, 1999. Under this agreement, Nymox sponsors the research of two principal investigators, Dr. Suzanne de la Monte and Dr. Jack Wands, pertaining to the use of neural thread protein diagnostic or therapeutic purposes in return for licensing rights to and patents arising out of this research. The sponsorship agreement was recently extended to March 1, 2005.

5. The Share Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Judith Fitzpatrick dated January 8, 2000. Under this agreement, we acquired 1,008,250 shares of the common stock of Serex, Inc. on March 2, 2000, which represented a majority interest of that company, in exchange for the issuance of 187,951 of our common shares and warrants (Series G) to purchase 115,662 of our shares at a strike price of $3.70 per share.

6. The Common Stock and Warrants Purchase Agreement dated March 6, 2000 between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Amro International, S.A. (“Amro”). Under this Agreement, Amro purchased 666,667 common shares of Nymox and received a warrant to purchase up to 66,667 common shares of Nymox at a strike price of $9.375 per share, for an aggregate of $4 million. The Agreement provided Amro with two opportunities to reprice a portion of the 666,667 common shares it initially purchased. Pursuant to these two repricing obligations, Nymox issued Amro a further 154,970 common shares.

Exchange Controls

Canada has no system of exchange controls. There are no exchange restrictions on borrowing from foreign countries or on the remittance of dividends, interest, royalties and similar payments, management fees, loan repayments, settlement of trade debts or the repatriation of capital.

There are no limitations on the rights of non-Canadians to exercise voting rights on their shares of Nymox.

80


TAXATION

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Persons

This section contains a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations for U.S. Persons (as defined below) who hold common shares of Nymox. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations, rulings of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), and judicial decisions in existence on the date hereof, all of which are subject to change. Any such change could apply retroactively and could have adverse consequences to Nymox and its shareholders. This summary is necessarily general and does not attempt to summarize all aspects of the federal tax laws (and does not attempt to summarize any state or local laws) that may affect an investor’s acquisition of an interest in Nymox. No ruling from the IRS will be requested and no assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with the tax consequences described in this summary.

For purposes of this discussion, the term “U.S. Person” means (a) an individual who is a citizen of the United States or who is resident in the United States for United States federal income tax purposes, (b) a corporation or a partnership that is organized under the laws of the United States or any state thereof, (c) an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (d) a trust (i) that is subject to the supervision of a court within the United States and is subject to the control of one or more United States persons as described in the Code, or (ii) that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person. The term “U.S. Holder” means a shareholder of Nymox who is a U.S. Person. The term “foreign corporation” means an entity that is classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and that is not organized under the laws of the United States or any state thereof.

This summary does not discuss all United States federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to U.S. Holders in light of their particular circumstances or to certain holders that may be subject to special treatment under United States federal income tax law (for example, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, dealers in securities, persons who hold shares as part of a straddle, hedging, constructive sale, or conversion transaction, U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, and U.S. Holders who acquired shares through exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services). Furthermore, this summary does not address any aspects of state or local taxation.

The tax consequences of an investment in Nymox are complex and based on tax provisions that are subject to change. Prospective investors are urged to consult with, and must depend upon, their own tax advisors with specific reference to their own tax situations as to the income and other tax consequences of an investment in Nymox.

Dividends and gains on sale. Except as described below with respect to the “passive foreign investment company” rules, distributions by Nymox to a U.S. Holder will be treated as ordinary dividend income to the extent of Nymox’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividend-received deduction generally allowed under the Code to dividend recipients that are U.S. corporations. The amount of any distribution in excess of Nymox’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will first be applied to reduce the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in its Nymox common shares, and any amount in excess of tax basis will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002 and before January 1, 2009, a dividend paid by Nymox generally will be taxed at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains if (a) Nymox is a “qualified foreign corporation” as defined in Section 1(h)(11) of the Code, (a “QFC”), (b) the U.S. Holder receiving such dividend is an individual, estate, or trust, and (c) such dividend is paid on common shares that have been held by such U.S. Holder for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the “ex-dividend date” (i.e., the first date that a purchaser of such common shares will not be entitled to receive such dividend). Nymox currently meets the definition of a QFC because its common shares are readily tradable of The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, an established securities market in the United States, provided that Nymox is not a “passive foreign investment company” (as described below) for the taxable year during which Nymox pays a dividend or for the preceding taxable year. If Nymox is not a QFC, a dividend paid by Nymox to a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates (and not at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains). The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the dividend rules.

81


Except as described below with respect to the “passive foreign investment company” rules, any gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on a sale or exchange of Nymox common shares (or on a distribution treated as a sale or exchange) generally will be treated as capital gain. Capital gains of corporations are taxable at the same rate as ordinary income. With respect to non-corporate taxpayers, the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short term capital loss may be taxed at a substantially lower rate than is ordinary income. A capital gain or loss is long-term if the asset has been held for more than one year and short-term if held for one year or less. In addition, the distinction between capital gain or loss and ordinary income or loss is relevant for purposes of limitations on the deductibility of capital losses.

A U.S. Holder generally may claim a credit against its U.S. federal income tax liability for Canadian income tax withheld from dividends received on Nymox common shares. The amount of this credit is subject to several limitations under the Code.

Controlled foreign corporation rules. A foreign corporation generally is classified as a “controlled foreign corporation” (a “CFC”) if more than 50% of the corporation’s shares (by vote or value) are owned, directly or indirectly, by “10% U.S. Shareholders”. For this purpose, a “10% U.S. Shareholder” is a U.S. Person that owns, directly or indirectly, shares possessing 10% or more of the voting power in the foreign corporation. Nymox believes that it is not a CFC at the present time. If Nymox were a CFC, each 10% U.S. Shareholder that owns, directly or indirectly through foreign entities, an interest in Nymox generally would be required to include in its gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes a pro-rata share of any “Subpart F” income earned by Nymox, whether or not such income is distributed by Nymox. Subpart F income generally includes interest, dividends, royalties, and gain on the sale of stock or securities.

Foreign personal holding company rules. In general, a foreign corporation is a “foreign personal holding company” (a “FPHC”) during a taxable year if (i) at any time during the taxable year, more than 50% of the shares (by vote or value) of the corporation are owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals who are U.S. Persons, and (ii) at least 50% of the gross income of the corporation for the taxable year consists of “foreign personal holding company income” (such as dividends, interest, royalties, and gains on the sale of stock or securities).

Nymox believes that it is not a FPHC at the present time. If Nymox were a FPHC, each U.S. Person that owns, directly or indirectly through foreign entities, an interest in Nymox generally would be required to recognize, as a dividend, the U.S. Person’s share of the undistributed annual income of Nymox.

Passive foreign investment company rules. In general, a foreign corporation is a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”) during a taxable year if 75% or more of its gross income for the taxable year constitutes “passive income” or if 50% or more of its assets (by average fair market value) held during the taxable year produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. In general, any U.S. Person that owns, directly or indirectly, an interest in a foreign corporation will be subject to an interest charge (in addition to regular U.S. federal income tax) upon the disposition by the U.S. Person of, or receipt by the U.S. Person of “excess distributions” with respect to, any shares of the foreign corporation if: (i) the foreign corporation is a PFIC during the taxable year in which such income is realized by the U.S. Person; or (ii) the foreign corporation was a PFIC during any prior taxable year that is included in whole or in part in the U.S. Person’s “holding period” (within the meaning of Section 1223 of the Code) with respect to its interest in the shares of the foreign corporation. Furthermore, the U.S. Person’s share of such gain or “excess distribution” will be taxable as ordinary income. There exist several other adverse tax consequences that may apply to any U.S. Person that owns, directly or indirectly, an interest in a PFIC.

82


A U.S. Person that owns, directly or indirectly, an interest in a PFIC can elect to treat such PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF”) with respect to the U.S. Person. In general, the effect of a QEF election with respect to a PFIC is that, beginning with the first taxable year to which the election applies and in all succeeding taxable years during which the foreign corporation is a PFIC, the U.S. Person is required to include in its income its share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gains of the PFIC. The U.S. Person is not taxable with respect to any distribution by the PFIC from earnings that have been included previously in the U.S. Person’s income under the QEF provisions. If the QEF election is made with respect to the first taxable year in which a U.S. Person owns, directly or indirectly, an interest in the particular PFIC, the adverse tax consequences described in the immediately preceding paragraph (including the interest charge and the treatment of gains as ordinary income) would not apply to the U.S. Person’s interest in that PFIC. In order to make a QEF election, a U.S. Person is required to provide to the IRS certain information furnished by the PFIC.

Nymox believes that it has not been a PFIC during any taxable year ending on or before December 31, 2003. It is not possible to express an opinion as to whether or not Nymox is or will be a PFIC during its current taxable year or future taxable years. Nymox intends to notify its U.S. Holders within 45 days after the end of the taxable year for which Nymox believes it might be a PFIC. Nymox has further undertaken (i) to provide its U.S. Holders with timely and accurate information as to its status as a PFIC and the manner in which the QEF election can be made and (ii) to comply with all record-keeping, reporting and other requirements so that the U.S. Holders, at their option, may make a QEF election.

Each U.S. Person who owns, directly or indirectly, common shares of Nymox is urged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to the advantages and disadvantages of making a QEF election with respect to Nymox.

Backup withholding. Information reporting to the IRS may be required with respect to payments of dividends on the Nymox common shares to U.S. Holders, and with respect to proceeds received by U.S. Holders on the sale of Nymox common shares. A U.S. Holder may be subject to backup withholding at a 30% rate with respect to dividends received with respect to Nymox common shares, or proceeds received on the sale of Nymox common shares through a broker, unless the U.S. Holder (i) demonstrates that it qualifies for an applicable exemption (such as the exemption for holders that are corporations), or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and complies with certain other requirements. Any amount withheld from payment to a U.S. Holder under the backup withholding rules generally will be allowed as credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Canadian Federal Income Taxation

The following is, as of the date of this report, a summary of the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to shareholders who receive a dividend from Nymox and who, at all relevant times, for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) the (“Tax Act”), hold and will hold Nymox common shares as capital property and deal with Nymox at arm’s length.

Nymox’s common shares will generally constitute capital property to a holder unless the holder holds such shares in the course of carrying on a business or the holder has acquired such shares in a transaction or transactions considered to be an adventure in the nature of trade. This summary is based on the current provisions of the Tax Act, the regulations under that act, counsel’s understanding of current administrative and assessing policies of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency and all specific proposals to amend the Tax Act publicly announced or released by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) before the date of this report (“Tax Proposals”).

83


The Tax Act contains certain provisions relating to securities held by certain financial institutions (the “Mark-to-Market Rules”). This summary does not take into account these Mark-to-Market Rules or any amendments to them contained in the Tax Proposals and taxpayers that are “financial institutions” for purposes of those rules should consult their own tax advisors.

This summary is not exhaustive of all possible Canadian federal income tax considerations and, except for the Tax Proposals, does not take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by legislative, governmental or judicial action, nor does it take into account tax legislation of any province, territory or foreign jurisdiction. This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal or tax advice to any particular holder of Nymox common shares.

Canadian Residents

The following summary is relevant to a holder of Nymox common shares who, for purposes of the Tax Act and any applicable tax treaty or convention, is resident in Canada at all relevant times.

Tax Treatment of Capital Gains and Capital Losses for Canadian Residents

On a disposition or deemed disposition of a Nymox common share, the holder will realize a capital gain (or capital loss) equal to the amount by which the proceeds of disposition for the Nymox common share exceed (or are less than) the aggregate of any costs of disposition and the adjusted cost base to the holder of the Nymox common share immediately before the disposition.

Pursuant to the Tax Act and subject to certain transitional rules which apply in certain circumstances, a holder of Nymox common shares will be required to include in income one-half of the amount of any capital gain (a “Taxable capital gain”) and may deduct one-half of the amount of any capital loss (an “Allowable capital loss”) against Taxable capital gains realized by the holder in the year of the disposition. Allowable capital losses in excess of Taxable capital gains may be carried back and deducted in any of the three preceding years or carried forward and deducted in any following year against taxable capital gains realized in such years to the extent and under the circumstances described in the Tax Act.

A Canadian-controlled private corporation will also be subject to a refundable tax of 6 2/3% on certain investment income, including taxable capital gains realized on the disposition of Nymox common shares, that will be refunded when the corporation pays taxable dividends (at a rate of C$1.00 for every C$3.00 of taxable dividend paid).

A capital loss realized by a holder of Nymox common shares that is a corporation, a partnership of which a corporation is a member or a trust of which a corporation is a beneficiary may be reduced by the amount of dividends received in certain circumstances. Capital gains realized by an individual may give rise to a liability for alternative minimum tax.

Tax Treatment of Dividends Received by Canadian Residents

In the case of a holder of Nymox common shares who is an individual, any dividends received on the common shares will be included in computing his income and will be subject to the gross-up and dividend tax credit rules normally applicable to taxable dividends paid by taxable Canadian corporations. A holder that is a corporation may be liable to pay refundable tax under Part IV of the Tax Act. However, a public corporation which is not controlled, whether because of a beneficial interest in one or more trusts or otherwise, by or for the benefit of an individual (other than a trust) or a related group of individuals (other than trusts) will not be liable to pay refundable tax under Part IV of the Tax Act.

84


In the case of a holder of Nymox common shares that is a corporation, the amount of any capital loss otherwise determined resulting from the disposition of a Nymox common share may be reduced by the amount of dividends previously received or deemed to have been received thereon. Any such restriction will not occur where the corporate holder owned the Nymox common share for 365 days or longer and such holder (together with any persons with whom it did not deal at arm’s length) did not own more than 5% of the shares of any class or series of Nymox at the time the relevant dividends were received or deemed to have been received. Analogous rules apply where a corporation is a member of a partnership or a beneficiary of a trust, which owns Nymox common shares.

Shareholders Who Are Not Residents Of Canada

The following summary is relevant to a holder of Nymox common shares, who, at all relevant times, for purposes of the Tax Act and any applicable tax treaty or convention, is a non-resident or is deemed to be a non-resident of Canada and does not use and is not deemed to use or hold Nymox common shares in the course of carrying on a business in Canada. Special rules, which are not discussed below, may apply to a non-resident that is an insurer which carries on business in Canada and elsewhere.

Dividends Paid To Non-Residents of Canada

Under the Tax Act, dividends paid or credited to a non-resident are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 25% of the gross amount of the dividends. This withholding tax may be reduced or eliminated pursuant to the terms of an applicable tax treaty between Canada and the country of residence of the non-resident. For example, for persons who are resident in the United States for purposes of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention, (the “Convention”) the rate of withholding tax on dividends is reduced to 15% generally and 5% when the United States resident is a company that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the company paying the dividends.

Under the Convention, dividends paid to certain religious, scientific, charitable and other similar tax-exempt organizations and certain organizations that are resident in, and exempt from tax in, the United States are exempt from Canadian non-resident withholding tax. Provided that certain administrative procedures designed to establish with the Canadian tax authorities the right of such entities to benefit from this withholding tax exemption are complied with by the tax-exempt entities prior to the Distribution, Nymox would not be required to withhold such tax on such payment. Alternatively, the above-described tax-exempt entities may claim a refund of Canadian withholding tax otherwise withheld by Nymox on the distribution of dividends.

Tax Treatment of Capital Gains of Non-Residents of Canada

On a disposition or deemed disposition of a Nymox common share, a non-resident holder will realize a capital gain (or capital loss) equal to the amount by which the proceeds of disposition for the Nymox common share exceed (or are less than) the aggregate of any costs of disposition and the adjusted cost base to the non-resident holder of the Nymox common share immediately before the disposition.

A non-resident of Canada is liable for Canadian income tax on a capital gain realized on the disposition of property only where that property constitutes “taxable Canadian property”. Pursuant to the Tax Act and subject to certain transitional rules which apply in certain circumstances, one-half of any capital gain from the disposition of taxable Canadian property is subject to Canadian tax.

Under the Tax Act, shares of Nymox will not constitute taxable Canadian property unless, at any time, in the five years immediately preceding the disposition, the non-resident holder, persons with whom the non-resident holder did not deal at arms length, or the non-resident holder together with all such persons owned (or had a right to acquire) 25% or more of the shares of any class of Nymox. Even in circumstances where shares of Nymox are taxable Canadian property to a non-resident holder, the non-resident holder may be entitled to relief from Canadian tax on any capital gain realized on the disposition thereof pursuant to the terms of an applicable tax treaty between Canada and the country of residence of the non-resident. For example, the Convention provides that gains realized by a resident of the United States on the disposition or deemed disposition of shares of a company will generally not be subject to tax under the Tax Act, provided that the value of the shares is not derived principally from real property situated in Canada. Nymox believes that the value of its shares is not currently derived principally from real property situated in Canada and it does not expect this to change in the foreseeable future.

85


Provided that the Nymox common shares remain listed on a prescribed stock exchange, which includes the NASDAQ SmallCap Market System, a non-resident holder who disposes of Nymox common shares will not be required to comply with the Canadian notification procedures generally applicable to dispositions of taxable Canadian property.

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our principal exposure to market risk relates to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2003, we have cash flow exposure to the changing interest rates on notes payable, bearing interest at the prime rate plus 2%, in the amount of $500,000. The maturity dates on notes payable in the amount of $200,000 outstanding at December 31, 2003 were extended from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004. Notes payable in the amount of $300,000, bearing interest at prime rate plus 2% are due on or before July 31, 2004.

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

        (a)        Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures . In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary-Treasurer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F and the Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary-Treasurer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

        (b)        Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting . There were not any significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

86


Item 16A.   AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our board of directors has determined that Dr. Hans Black, the Chairman of our Audit Committee, is an audit committee financial expert and is an independent director.

Item 16B.   CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to our officers, directors and employees in general and our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar functions in particular. The code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report.

Item 16C.   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Our principal independent auditor is KPMG LLP.

Fees and Services

During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, we paid the following fees for professional services to KPMG LLP:

2003
2002
(U.S.$)

Audit Services 43,000  39,000 
     
Audit-Related Services 5,000  4,000 
     
Tax Services 9,000  7,000 
     
Other Services



Total
57,000  50,000 

Audit Services are defined as the standard audit work that needs to be performed each year in order to issue an opinion on our consolidated financial statements and to issue reports on our statutory financial statements. It also includes services that can only be provided by the auditor signing the audit report such as auditing of non-recurring transactions and application of new accounting policies, audits of significant and newly implemented system controls, pre-issuance reviews of quarterly financial results, consents and comfort letters and any other audit services required for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or other regulatory filings.

Audit-Related Services include those other assurance services provided by auditors but not restricted to those that can only be provided by the auditor signing the audit report. They include amounts for services such as acquisition due diligence, audits of pension and benefit plans, contractual audits of third party arrangements, assurance services on corporate citizenship reporting, and consultation regarding new accounting pronouncements.

Tax Services represent tax compliance and other services and expatriate and executive tax return services.

87


Other Services consist of actuarial services for pension and employee benefit plans. As required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, KPMG can no longer provide certain of these services to us after May 2004.

Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

Our Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of our independent auditor’s work. Our Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee appoints the auditors and oversees and fixes the compensation for all such services. KPMG and our management report to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis regarding the extent of services actually provided in accordance with the applicable pre-approval, and regarding the fees for the services performed.

PART III

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial statements identified below are included in Item 8 of this report and are incorporated by reference in this item.

  At and for the year ended December 31, 2003:
        Consolidated Balance Sheets
        Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit
        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
        Notes

  At and for the year ended December 31, 2002:
        Consolidated Balance Sheets
        Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit
        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
        Notes

  At and for the year ended December 31, 2001:
        Consolidated Statement of Operations and Deficit
        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
        Notes

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable





88


ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included with or incorporated by reference into this report:

Exhibit No. Description

1(a) Articles of Incorporation, as amended. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
1(b) Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(a) Memorandum of Agreement between Paul Averback and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(b) Share Option Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(c) Research and License Agreement between the Massachusetts General Hospital Corporation and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(d) Research and License Amendment between the Massachusetts General Hospital Corporation and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(e) Common Stock Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Jaspas Investments Limited dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.0 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(f) Registration Rights Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Jaspas Investments Limited dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(g) Escrow Agreement among Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, Jaspas Investments Limited and Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(h) Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase common shares issued to Jaspas Investments Limited dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(i) Research and License Agreement between the Rhode Island Hospital Corporation and the Company dated May 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission May 15, 2000)
4(j) Research and License Amendment between the Rhode Island Hospital Corporation and the Company dated November 19, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission June 28, 2002)
4(k) Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Lorros-Greyse Investments Limited dated January 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.0 to the Company's F-3 Registration Statement filed with the Commission on March 12, 2003)
4(l) Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Lorros-Greyse Investments Limited dated August 25, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's 6-K Report filed with the Commission on November 13, 2003)
8 List of Subsidiaries of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
11 Code of Business Conduct for the Officers, Directors and Employees of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
12(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)

89


12(b) Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
13(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13(b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



















90


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
      (Registrant)


 
/S/ Paul Averback
Paul Averback
Title:  President

Date:  June 30, 2004












91


EXHIBIT INDEX
NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Form 20-F Annual Report

Exhibit No. Description

1(a) Articles of Incorporation, as amended. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
1(b) Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(a) Memorandum of Agreement between Paul Averback and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(b) Share Option Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(c) Research and License Agreement between the Massachusetts General Hospital Corporation and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(d) Research and License Amendment between the Massachusetts General Hospital Corporation and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission December 9, 1996)
4(e) Common Stock Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Jaspas Investments Limited dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.0 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(f) Registration Rights Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Jaspas Investments Limited dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(g) Escrow Agreement among Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, Jaspas Investments Limited and Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(h) Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase common shares issued to Jaspas Investments Limited dated November 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company's Form F-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission February 29, 2000)
4(i) Research and License Agreement between the Rhode Island Hospital Corporation and the Company dated May 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission May 15, 2000)
4(j) Research and License Amendment between the Rhode Island Hospital Corporation and the Company dated November 19, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 20-F filed with the Commission June 28, 2002)
4(k) Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Lorros-Greyse Investments Limited dated January 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.0 to the Company's F-3 Registration Statement filed with the Commission on March 12, 2003)
4(l) Common Stock Private Purchase Agreement between Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and Lorros-Greyse Investments Limited dated August 25, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's 6-K Report filed with the Commission on November 13, 2003)
8 List of Subsidiaries of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation


11 Code of Business Conduct for the Officers, Directors and Employees of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
12(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
12(b) Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
13(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13(b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 8

SUBSIDIARIES OF NYMOX PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

Serex, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

Nymox Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

Exhibit 11







Code of Business Conduct

for the Officers, Directors and Employees of

Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation



Introduction

Trust and integrity are the foundations of our business at Nymox. People rely us, whether they be an investor buying our stock or a patient using one of our products, and they expect us to measure up to the standards of legal and ethical conduct of our business.

We are committed to conducting our business in a competent, ethical and legal manner at all levels of our operations from the board to management to employees.

This Code of Business Conduct is one means of affirming and honoring this commitment. All members of the Nymox team are required to read and understand the Code of Business Conduct and to agree to abide by the standards set out in it. It is everyone’s responsibility to comply with the Code of Business Conduct and to report any activity believed to be contrary to it. The two Appendices to this Code, the Audit Committee’s Policies and Procedures about Handling Complaints Regarding Accounting, Internal Accounting Controls or Auditing Matters (Appendix A) and the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (Appendix B), form part of this Code.

This Code of Business Conduct applies to all employees, officers and directors of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and its affiliates and subsidies, including Nymox Corporation and Serex, Inc. References to “Nymox” or “the Company” in this Code of Business Conduct include Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and its affiliates and subsidies, including Nymox Corporation and Serex, Inc.

By living up to this Code, we can create long term value to our shareholders, foster a rewarding and creative working environment and bring important new treatments and technologies to the patients and families who urgently need them.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Standards of Business Ethics and Conduct
Employment Policies
Conflicts of Interest
      Loans
      Gifts and Entertainment
Confidentiality
Corporate Communications
      Marketing and Sales
Company Property 10 
      Business Opportunities 11 
Intellectual Property 12 
      Trademarks 12 
Insider Trading Policy 13 
      Blackout Periods 14 
Disclosure Requirements Within the Company and In Public Filings 15 
Privacy Policy 15 
Recordkeeping, Records Management and Record Retention 16 
Antitrust/Fair Competition 18 
Computer and Internet Use 18 
Reporting and Investigating Violations and Misconduct 19 
Receipt and Review of the Code 21 
Appendix A 22 
      Policies and Procedures about Handling Complaints Regarding Accounting, Internal Accounting Controls or
      Auditing Matters 22 
Appendix B 29 
      Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers 29 





1


Standards of Business Ethics and Conduct

Lawful and Ethical Behavior Is the Cornerstone of Our Business

Lawful and ethical behavior is required at all time. Nymox’s policy is to be a good corporate citizen that complies with all the applicable laws and regulations of the countries in which we operate and acts in accordance with our Company’s high standards of business conduct. This policy applies to all members of the Nymox team, whether employed with Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation or with any of its affiliates or subsidiaries such as Serex, Inc. or Nymox Corporation

The Code of Business Conduct provides information about our standards of integrity and business conduct and explains our legal and ethical responsibilities. It does not address every specific situation or set forth a rule that will answer every question. Rather, it is intended to provide guidance and assistance in making the right decision. It is not exhaustive. Additional requirements may be set by the Board or management for specific areas or functions within the company. This Code of Business Conduct supersedes any prior rules of conduct or ethical behavior set out in employment codes or handbooks or company policies.

All officers, directors and employees are expected to comply with the Code of Business Conduct and to report to the company any situation where our standards or the laws are being violated. Any employee, officer or director disclosing, in good faith, violations or suspected violations of legal or ethical requirements or this Code of Business Conduct or other Company policy will not be subjected to retaliation, retribution or intimidation.

The company’s management, including its CEO, CFO and other officers and any of its employees in a managerial or supervisory position, is responsible for ensuring adherence to and compliance with the Code of Business Conduct. Officers, managers and supervisors should take reasonable steps to make sure that the employees under his or her direct supervision or management receive a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and read, understand and agree to comply with it.

Failure to comply with the provisions of the Code of Business Conduct will not be tolerated. A breach of the Code of Business Conduct can result not only in disciplinary action, including immediate dismissal, but also may attract civil or criminal liability for the individual concerned and for the company.

All employees, officers and directors are expected to read, understand and follow the Code of Business Conduct. Advice and further information about the policies and legal requirements set out in the Code of Business Conduct can be obtained by contacting the company’s General Counsel.

2


Any waiver of the policies, principles and practices set forth in the Code of Business Conduct for directors and executive officers, including senor financial officers, must be approved by the Board of Directors. Any such waiver is to be granted only where truly necessary and warranted and then subject to such limitations and qualifications as are necessary to protect the Company to the greatest extent possible. Any such waiver along with the reasons for the waiver will promptly be publicly disclosed to the Company’s shareholders and the investing public at large in accordance with applicable law.

This Code of Business Conduct represents the company’s current policy and comments about it and suggestions for changes are welcomed and encouraged. We expect the Code of Business Conduct to change to meet evolving legal and ethical standards and to accommodate changes in the company’s operations and business plans. All employees, officers and directors will be required to comply with any subsequent amendments or additions to the Code of Business Conduct.

Employment Policies

Nymox regards honesty, loyalty and diligence as essential parts of the duties of our officers, directors and employees. This includes acting in the best interests of the Company during the performance of these duties and not taking any actions intended or calculated to harm the Company and its business, such as:

  misrepresenting the status of the Company’s business, finances, research or product development to a supervisor, executive officer or director or to a third party;

  falsifying any financial, business or research records; or

  advising, soliciting or assisting, directly or indirectly, any employee or officer of the Company to terminate his or her employment with the Company.

It is our policy to treat all employees or prospective employees equally without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or disability. This policy applies to all officers, directors and employees, whether in a managerial position or not, and any acts of discrimination are unacceptable.

It is also our policy to provide a comfortable and rewarding work environment for our employees that is free from harassment, including any verbal, physical or sexual harassment or abuse. Conduct that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment is unacceptable. Any employee who believes that he or she has been subject to harassment should promptly report such conduct to his or her immediate supervisor, or, if the supervisor is responsible directly or indirectly for the conduct complained of, to the supervisor’s manager.

3


Any form of workplace violence is completely unacceptable. Nymox is committed to a safe working environment, free of threats, intimidation and physical harm and has adopted a workplace violence policy of zero tolerance. Workplace violence includes not only physical assaults and fighting but also threatening comments, intimidation, and the intentional destruction of or damage to any company or employee property. Any comments or behavior that reasonably could be interpreted as an intent to do harm to employees or property will be considered a threat. Any employee who believes he or she may be the target of violence or threats of violence, or is aware of violent or threatening conduct by another individual, that could result in injury to a Nymox employee or the destruction or damage of property, has a responsibility to immediately report the situation to his or her immediate supervisor or manager.

Health and safety are important aspects of job performance. Employees are expected to learn the safety procedures applicable to their jobs and follow them. Any concerns over health and safety issues should be promptly reported to a supervisor.

Nymox is also committed to the protection of the environment. Employees and officers are expected to comply with environmental laws, rules and regulations in the performance of their duties.

Substance abuse can pose serious health and safety risks not only to the individual concerned but also to the employees who work with him or her and to the company’s customers or suppliers who may rely on his or her job performance. Drinking alcohol, taking recreational drugs or drugs of abuse, or misusing prescription medication, or possessing or being under the effects of any of them while on the job, is unacceptable. Employees displaying aberrant behavior or reasonably suspected of such drug or alcohol use may be asked to submit to an appropriate alcohol or drug test. The use of alcoholic beverages may be authorized for special Company functions. At such functions, any decision to consume any alcoholic beverage is the personal decision of the individual alone; anyone choosing to partake is expected to consume in moderation and be responsible for his or her own acts, including any potential civil or criminal liability for drinking and driving.

Nymox maintains a no-smoking policy at all its workplaces.

Unless otherwise agreed in writing and subject to any applicable law, all officers and employees are employed at-will. This means that employment is not guaranteed for any specific length of time and may be suspended or terminated t any time with or without cause. No verbal promises or oral representations made to an employee or officer can change this relationship; only a properly signed employment agreement can.



4


Conflicts of Interest

The officers, directors and employees of Nymox must be careful to avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflicts of interest whenever possible. A conflict of interest can arise occurs when an individual’s private interests conflict or appear to conflict with the interests of Nymox as a whole. The existence, nature and extent of a conflict of interest depends on circumstances including the nature and relative importance of the interests involved. The interest may be financial or personal such as when a personal relationship is involved.

Conflict of interest issues can generally be resolved by promptly notifying the Company of a potential conflict of interest. Employees must therefore notify their managers or supervisors of any actual or potential conflict of interest situation. Officers of the Company should inform the CEO. Senior financial officers, including the CEO and CFO, should inform the Audit Committee of the Board in accordance with the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.

An employee’s manager or supervisor can provide guidance on how best to resolve the conflict. If needed, the Company’s General Counsel can be contacted for guidance.

Any actions taken will be in favor of resolving or avoiding any potential conflict.

It is impossible to exhaustively list all possible areas where a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict may arise. The Company relies on the honesty and integrity of its officers, employees and directors to identify situations where a potential conflict of interest may arise.

One area where a conflict of interest situation can arise is where an employee, officer or director has a financial interest in an existing or prospective customer, supplier, collaborator, partner or competitor of the Company either directly or through a family member, company, partnership or other legal entity. These interests include:

  ownership interest in suppliers, customers, collaborators, partners or competitors;
  consulting or employment relationships with customers, suppliers, collaborators, partners or competitors; or
  outside business activity that is competitive with any company business.

All such financial interests should be disclosed. In general, shareholdings in publicly traded companies that do not represent either more than 1% of the publicly traded company’s float or more than 10% of an individual’s net worth should not raise concerns over a conflict of interest.

A second area of potential conflict occurs when an officer, director or employee has divided loyalties between Nymox and another company. In general, no employee or officer shall engage in any other employment or business or act as an officer or director of or consult with any other company, business or person except with the prior approval of the Company’s CEO. Any such approval is given on the understanding that the employee’s activities will not conflict with his or her duties and responsibilities at Nymox. No director may sit on a board of directors of any customer, supplier or competitor of the Company except with the prior approval of the Board. All such relationships must be promptly disclosed to the Company.

5


A third area of conflict of interest can arise where an employee or officer is involved in outside activity substantial enough to raise questions about his or her ability to devote appropriate time and attention to assigned job responsibilities. In some cases, Nymox employees may be involved in outside businesses with Nymox approval, or may hold political office or serve on civic boards. These situations do not necessarily constitute a conflict of interest, but it is the employee’s responsibility to ensure that this activity does not conflict with Nymox’s interests. This requires keeping the two activities strictly separated by adhering to the following standards:

  No work relating to other organizations on Nymox time;
  No use of Nymox equipment and supplies, or the time of any Nymox personnel for outside work;
  No promotion of products or services from an outside business to other Nymox employees during working hours or on Nymox property; and
  No use of the fact of Nymox employment or position to promote an outside business.

Loans

The Company as a general policy does not make loans of money, property or shares to its employees, officers or directors, their family members or businesses or other related entities . Any such proposed loan to an employee must be pre-approved by the Company’s CFO. In addition, any such proposed loans to an executive or senior financial officer must be submitted to the Audit Committee of the Board for review for compliance with legal requirements and corporate policy and for ultimate approval. Any reimbursement of expenses or disbursements to an executive officer or senior financial officer or his or her family member, business or other related entity must be pre-approved by the CFO. Any executive or senior financial officer with signing authority over any of the accounts of the Company must get pre-approval from the CFO of any significant disbursement of funds from that account in accordance with any policy or direction from the CFO or the Audit Committee.

Gifts and Entertainment

Receiving gifts, gratuities and entertainment from people with whom the company does business is generally not acceptable because it may potentially pose a conflict of interest by implying an obligation on behalf of the company. Employees and officers should make the company’s policy on gifts, gratuities and entertainment known in the course of regular business dealings with third parties.

Accepting gifts is generally not acceptable unless:

  The gift is of nominal value; and
  The gift is not intended and could not be perceived by others to improperly influence business decisions.

6


Occasionally, as a means of building relationships, an employee or officer may accept social entertainment, such as meals or event tickets, if such entertainment:

  permits business or educational discussions;
  is pursuant to a bona fide business relationship;
  is consistent with industry practices;
  does not influence or is not perceived by others to influence business decisions;
  is not excessive in price or quantity; and
  would not embarrass the company if it was brought to public attention.

In questionable cases, employees should consult with their supervisors.

Before offering or accepting any gifts, gratuities or entertainment to or from a government official, General Counsel should be consulted. Laws concerning this matter are often complex and vary from country to country. Therefore, it is generally unacceptable to receive a gift or invitation from a government employee or to provide a gift or invitation to a government employee.

The payment or receipt of any bribes, kickbacks, secret commissions and similar benefits or payments in any amount or form is strictly prohibited.

Confidentiality

During the course of his or her employment or tenure as a director, an employee, officer or director may have access to confidential and/or proprietary technical, scientific or business information relating to the Company’s business, finances, products, research, intellectual property, marketing, sales, product development and other business or scientifically related activities or provided in confidence by a customer, supplier, collaborator or partner (“Confidential Information”).

It is vital to the Company’s business and success to preserve the confidentiality of its technical, scientific and business affairs and to maintain its intellectual properties, including trade secrets, know-how and patent applications.

As well, it is important for the Company as a public company to control the timing, content and extent of any disclosures about its scientific and business affairs. Improper disclosure can have serious legal implications both for the Company and for the employee, officer or director concerned.

Accordingly, all employees, officers and directors must:

  Keep in strict confidence any Confidential Information and not to disclose it to any third party except as required by law, regulation, legal process or other governmental authority, or as expressly approved by the employee’s supervisor or the Company’s CEO;

7


  Take reasonable care to maintain all Confidential Information in confidence and shall inform the Company immediately upon the discovery of any unauthorized disclosure or use of any Confidential Information and take reasonable steps to prevent any further unauthorized disclosure or use; and
  Not use any Confidential Information for any purpose other than the performance of her/his duties as an officer, director or employee of the Company.

Information which is in the public domain through public disclosure by the Company in a public filing, press release, web site posting or publication or broadcast is subject to the Corporate Communications policy below.

Corporate Communications

Since Nymox’s common stock is publicly traded, there are certain important legal restrictions and limitations imposed on all Nymox employees, officers, and directors concerning the disclosure of material information about Nymox. Breach of these legal requirements can expose the company and its officers, directors and employees and any outsider improperly privy to inside information to significant legal liability, including possible criminal sanctions.

As well, communicating information prematurely, incorrectly or without proper clearance, no matter how innocuous that communication may seem, could have a serious impact on the company. It could adversely affect the company’s competitive position, stock price, litigation or shareholder value.

It is Company policy that all information in the possession of any Company employee, officer, director or agent about Nymox or obtained in the course of work for Nymox relating to any other company belongs to Nymox and may only be disclosed in accordance with this Code of Business Conduct.

It is also Company policy, as mandated by the Board of Directors, that only designated spokespersons are authorized to discuss Company business with the press, the public and other non-company personnel. The designated spokespersons are the Company’s CEO, Paul Averback, Medical Director, Michael Munzar and General Counsel, Jack Gemmell. Anyone receiving inquiries of this nature should decline comment and refer the person making the inquiry to one of the designated spokespersons.

Company business includes its prospects, technology, patent position, research and development projects, sales figures, marketing strategy, financials, possible acquisitions and other material information. This includes all such information about the Company, whether it is Confidential Information covered by the Confidentiality policy or information that the Company has disclosed in the public domain.

8


The press, the public and other non-company personnel include newspaper, television and other reporters, stock brokers, financial analysts, investors, shareholders, customers, researchers, academic collaborators and contractors.

All written corporate communications for public release or for an external audience must be approved by the CEO or his or her designate before release or dissemination. Corporate communication includes press releases, investor material, government filings and reports, financial statements, advertisements, sales promotion materials, court filings and newsletters.

Internal Company communications such as e-mail messages, memos, executive speeches and presentations, and messages may not be forwarded to individuals outside Nymox without the express approval of the CEO or his or her designate.

Oral communications and presentations that discuss Company business and are for individuals or audiences outside of the Company must be cleared by the CEO or his or her designate.

Inquiries or calls from the press, investors, shareholders and other individuals about Company business should be referred to a designated spokesperson with a message taken identifying the name of the caller, the organization they are with and the nature of their inquiry.

These precautions are particularly important for sales personnel in contact with the public but they apply also to lab personnel, office staff and all other employees, officers and directors.

Nymox expects strict compliance with these procedures by all personnel at every level and all employees, officers and directors should be aware of these polices, procedures and obligations. Failure to follow the letter and spirit of this Corporate Communications policy is a serious matter and can be suitable grounds for dismissal for cause.

Any questions, concerns, clarifications and guidances about the obligations or responsibilities under this policy should be sought from the Company’s General Counsel before acting.

Marketing and Sales

Nymox offers products and services that are highly regulated by government agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. As well, Nymox is committed to fair and honorable dealing with its customers, agents and distributors.

Marketing and sales personnel must ensure that any statements or representations he or she makes about the uses, applications or performance characteristics of the Company’s products and services are in accordance with approved Company product or service information, including applicable regulatory approvals and authorized marketing, sales, promotional or advertising material; do not misstate or omit any material information about the product or service; and are not otherwise intended to materially mislead any prospective purchaser, customer, distributor or regulatory agency. No discounts, price reductions, special services or other accommodations may be offered nor any guarantees, warranties or representation made without prior approval of the appropriate supervisor or officer.

9


Company Property

All officers, directors and employees have an obligation to safeguard and protect not only Nymox’s assets, but also the assets of others with which the Company is entrusted. These assets include physical property, company records, financial documents, and confidential information including patient and research subject information as well as intellectual property, such as patents and trademarks. Any loss, damage, misuse, fraudulent alteration or deletion, theft, embezzlement, misappropriation and destruction of company property should be promptly reported.

All officers and employees are responsible for the safe and proper use and care of any equipment, reagents, biological samples, animals or other company property he or she may use in connection with their job. This includes the good computer practices such as regularly updating software, scanning suspect email attachments and files for viruses and other potentially damaging software, and not providing passwords and system access information to unauthorized personnel or third parties.

Company property, assets and services should be used only for the purposes of employment or the Company’s business or as otherwise authorized and should not be used for the personal benefit of an employee, officer or director or any third party. Any personal use should be promptly reported and accounted for. In doubtful cases, prior approval from a supervisor should be sought before using company property or services that do not solely benefit the company.

Company credit cards should not be used for personal expenditures and any such use should be promptly reported and reimbursed.

Company property and records should remain in company facilities and offices, not be removed except for the purposes of employment or the Company’s business or except as otherwise authorized, and, if removed, be returned as soon as possible. Any officer, employee or director who has removed company property must take reasonable steps in keeping with the nature of the property or record and its value to the Company to ensure the safety and security of that property or record while off-site.

No employee, officer or director or person acting under his or her direction shall make or retain copies of any company property or record, including documents and computer files, except for the purposes of employment or the Company’s business.

10


All Company property shall be returned promptly upon termination of employment, office or position with the Company, including copies and duplicates of Company documents, files, records, and other information, copies of Company software, lab notebooks, corporate records, reagents, patient samples and any progeny and replicants of cell lines, bacteria, animals or other organisms that form part of the Company property.

“Company property” means any property owned by the Company or provided to the Company by a third party for its use and includes such items and equipment as:

  (a) laboratory equipment, reagents, samples, specimens, standards, protocols, requisitions, patient or research subject information or records, test results, drug candidates, cell lines, bacteria, viruses, plants, animals, notebooks, papers, presentations and publications;

  (b) computer equipment, software, files, disks, cd-roms, tapes and all other electronic means of storing data or information;

  (c) cell phones, pagers, answering machines, telephones and other telecommunication equipment;

  (d) office equipment, office furniture, correspondence, memoranda, reports, faxes, files, books, magazines, stationary, messages, e-mails, contracts, patent documents, customer lists, supplier lists, brochures, marketing material, displays, posters and financial reports; and

  (e) credit cards, calling cards, bank cards, checkbooks, deposit books, bank statements, financial records, canceled checks, receipts, invoices, bills and accounts.

Business Opportunities

It is against company policy for any employee, officer or director to take for themselves personally opportunities that are discovered through the use of corporate property, information or position with the company or otherwise use company property for personal gain. This includes competing with the Company for business opportunities.

Information acquired as an officer, employee or director of the Company belongs to the Company and is for the sole benefit and use of the Company.

All employees and officers of the Company have a positive obligation to promptly disclose to their supervisor or to the President of the Company any business opportunities that come to their attention and that relate to the Company’s business. This includes research proposals, licensing opportunities, patent applications and assignments, co-marketing ventures, technology transfers and prospective collaborators or employees.

11


Intellectual Property

Intellectual property is the cornerstone of Nymox’s business. The Company has made substantial investments of its investors’ funds and the time of its officers and employees to acquire, develop and expand its intellectual property portfolio. Protection of these intellectual property rights is of critical importance.

In order to secure and protect these intellectual property rights, all employees and officers have a duty and an obligation to:

  promptly disclose any discoveries or inventions made during his or her employment with the Company, relating to, connected with or arising out of that employment, related to or connected with the business of the Company, or conceived or reduced to practice at any time during that employment, either solely or jointly with others and whether or not developed on the employee’s or officer’s own time or with the resources of the Company;

  assign completely, exclusively and irrevocably to the Company any and all rights, interests and title to any inventions, discoveries and ideas, whether patentable or not, (including, but not limited to patent applications, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how, industrial designs, or other intellectual property rights);

  co-operate with the Company both during the term of his or her employment with the Company and after termination of that employment, in any proceedings such as patent prosecutions necessary to secure, protect or extend those rights, including to execute, on request, any patent, copyright, trademark, trade secrets or industrial design assignments, applications, certificates, affidavits or other documents that, in the opinion of the Company, are necessary to secure, protect or evidence the Company’s intellectual property rights.

Trademarks

It is important that Nymox trademarks be used properly and consistently to maintain their value and distinctiveness. This applies to all trademark usage in company communications and materials such as advertising and sales literature, press releases, business forms, correspondence, packages, containers, labels, signs and displays.

Proper trademark usage includes:

  consistent and correct use of the trademark’s format and name. This includes correct spelling of the trademark, including appropriate capitalization and spaces, hyphens, or other punctuation. Stylized marks should always be used in their particular typeface or logo form.

12


  marking the trademark with the TM (™) symbol if unregistered or the R (®) symbol if registered. Do not mark the trademark as registered (®) if, in fact, it has not yet been approved for registration by the relevant Trademark Office in the country where it is used.
  using the trademark only in association with the goods and services for which it is registered or intended.
  using the trademark only as a brand name in combination with the common or generic name for the product, e.g. the NicAlert™ test. Preferably, the trademark must be used at least once in conjunction with the generic name of the product on every label, container, or text referring to the trademark.
  using the trademark only as an adjective. Do not use a trademark as a verb or noun.
  displaying or writing the trademark in a manner that distinguishes it from the rest of the text and makes it more conspicuous than the generic name of the product. If a trademark is used with noncapitalized words, it should be properly capitalized.

No employee, officer or director shall use any Nymox trademark for any purpose other than authorized company business.

Insider Trading Policy

Nymox is a public company governed by complex trading and securities laws, rules and regulation. Company policy forbids unauthorized disclosure of material nonpublic information about the company or the companies it deals with, and both company policy and the law forbid profiting from material nonpublic information relating to Nymox or the companies with whom it does business.

Employees, officers and directors of Nymox may, in the course of performing their duties, learn information about the Company that is not generally available to the public. The law regards the use of material nonpublic information by an officer, director or employee for his or her personal profit as being akin to an unlawful misappropriation of that information to the detriment of the company, the shareholders and the investing public at large. The consequences of such a misappropriation can be very serious both to the offending individual and to other officers, directors and employees as well as the Company as a whole.

Material information about a public company, in general, is information that would be expected to (a) affect the decision of a reasonable investor to purchase or sell the company’s securities, or (b) alter the market price of the company’s securities.

Examples of material information include:

  internal financial information such as quarterly and annual reports;
  regulatory approvals or disapprovals of a new product;

13


  significant technological breakthroughs; or
  contemplated acquisition of another company or disposition of an existing business to another company.

Information is considered nonpublic if it has not been disseminated in a manner making it available to investors generally, such as through disclosure in the company’s annual or periodic reports to its stockholders or its securities filings, inclusion in a press release or widespread reporting in the media. As well, investors must have a reasonable period to absorb and react to the information. This is typically on the order of two trading days.

Like proprietary information, all employees, officers and directors should take great care not to disclose material nonpublic information within the company, inadvertently or unnecessarily and in no event to disclose such information outside the company. Company business should not be discussed where unauthorized persons may be present such as in elevators or restaurants, even if no names are used. In addition, disclosures to others within the company is permissible only on a need-to-know basis.

Those possessing material nonpublic information may not buy or sell company securities or disclose such information to anyone who is not an employee of the company. Likewise, company individuals with knowledge of material nonpublic information about other companies (suppliers, customers or other companies the company deals with), even those with whom the company only contemplates transactions, may not buy or sell the securities of those companies or disclose such information to others.

Company policy requires all employees, officers and directors to report any trading activities in the Company’s shares, including any options, agreements or other arrangements for the purchase, sale, pledging or transfer of Company’s shares, to the CFO.

As well, supervisors who become aware that an employee who has material nonpublic information is trading in the company’s securities should report this to the Company’s General Counsel and to the CFO. All Company supervisors have an obligation to remain alert to cases where others, especially those subject to their supervision, may be ignoring rules against insider trading. Securities laws penalize not only those implicated in insider trading, but also controlling persons who fail to take action when they know individuals they control are violating the rules.

Any employees, officers and directors uncertain about the rules on buying or selling company securities or securities of companies familiar to them as company employees should consult with General Counsel before making any purchases or sales.

Blackout Periods

Trades by officers, directors and employees of the Company involved in the compiling, analysis and preparation of the Company’s periodic financial reports are forbidden for thirty (30) days prior to the last day for the release of quarterly and annual financial reports and for a two trading day period following their release.

14


Trades by officers, directors and employees of the Company involved in merger negotiations that may be material are forbidden during the period of the negotiations and for a two trading day period following the release of the details of any proposed merger agreement or of the failure of the negotiations.

An exception to a trading blackout period may be granted in cases of financial hardship or the imminent expiry of options where any trading will be conducted in accordance with a pre-determined nondiscretionary plan that complies with securities law rules and regulations.

Disclosure Requirements Within the Company and In Public Filings

Nymox is a public company listed on NASDAQ and as such has a legal responsibility to file with the SEC and other securities regulators both periodic reports (such as quarterly and annual reports) and interim reports of potentially material information. These reports must be full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable.

In order that Nymox may meet these reporting and disclosure requirements, every officer, employee and director of Nymox is under a continuing obligation to promptly and accurately report:

  any potentially material information concerning the Company's business that comes to his or her attention;
  all financial information relating to the Company's business, including contractual obligations;
  any potential conflict of interest situations or related party transactions; and
  any possible violation of this Code of Business Conduct or of the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.

An employee shall report such information promptly to his or her supervisor or manager; a director or officer to the CFO or CEO.

Officers and directors whose shareholdings in the Company must be disclosed in a securities filing or shareholder circular shall provide this information to the CFO reasonably in advance of the deadlines for such filings.

Privacy Policy

Nymox respects and protects the privacy of individuals and their personal information that may be provided to, collected, held or used by the Company, its officers, directors and employees. In particular, Nymox is committed to compliance with all applicable privacy and confidentiality laws, rules and regulations in force in the various jurisdictions in which it operates and expects all of its officers, employees and directors to comply with these laws and with the privacy principles and obligations set out in this policy. Nymox has designated the Company’s General Counsel as the officer with the overall responsibility of monitoring compliance with this Privacy Policy and with the applicable law.

15


Personal information is information that relates to a natural person and allows that person to be identified. It includes a person’s name, address, phone number, email address, birth date, medical records and history, and social security number.

Nymox’s policy is to treat all such personal information as confidential, and not to disclose that information to third parties without the consent of the person concerned except in exceptional circumstances. Personal information about an employee’s name, title, business address, and business phone number and email address may be disclosed for business purposes.

All officer, employees and directors must take appropriate security measures to ensure that such personal information remains confidential. Reasonable care must be taken to store personal information to prevent accidental or unauthorized disclosure; the more sensitive the information, the more stringent the security measures that will be taken. Access to personal information within the Company shall be on a need-to-know basis. The Company’s policy is to retain personal information only for as long as is necessary to satisfy the purposes for which it was collected, or as required or permitted by law.

Personal information will be used only for the purpose for which it was collected. The consent of the person concerned or his or her legal representative will be obtained before using personal information for other purposes or to communicate personal information to another party. In exceptional circumstances personal information may be communicate without the consent of the person concerned, such as:

  to a person responsible for the prevention, detection or repression of crime;

  to a public body that collects such information as part of its function;

  to a person who must act urgently to protect the life, health or safety of the person concerned; or

  where otherwise required or permitted by law.

Recordkeeping, Records Management and Record Retention

Nymox is required to maintain proper and adequate records both to further its business objectives and to meet financial, legal, and regulatory requirements.

16


In order to meet these requirements, Nymox maintains a system of internal controls intended to ensure the integrity and accuracy of its accounting records and financial statements. Any complaints regarding the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, including any questions concerning the integrity, accuracy, reliability and honesty of its accounting records or financial statements should be dealt with in accordance with the Complaint Handling procedure set out in Appendix A.

All employees, officers and directors have an obligation to record information accurately and truthfully and on a timely basis. In general, all transactions made on behalf of the Company shall be executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and recorded on a consistent basis. All officers and employees are required to provide the CFO on a timely basis with originals of any invoices, contracts, agreements, licenses, leases, mortgages, loan agreements, corporate minutes, employment records, and insurance policies. Any payment, transfer or disbursement of the Company’s funds or property must be supported by appropriate documentation and be made only for the purpose set out in that documentation. At no time shall any employee, officer or director falsify, forge, or fraudulently alter any accounting, financial or other company record.

All Company accounting records and financial statements must be kept and presented in accordance with the laws of each applicable jurisdiction. In particular, all Company accounting records must fairly and accurately reflect in reasonable detail the transactions to which they relate and/or the Company’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. They must not contain any false or intentionally misleading entries and must be appropriately classified as to accounts, departments and accounting periods.

The proper storage, maintenance and retention of corporate records is an important aspect of the Company’s business. Nymox operates in a number of highly regulated areas, each with their own complex regulatory requirements concerning recordkeeping, records management and record retention. It is impracticable to list all these requirement here. Company managers are expected to acquaint themselves with the relevant requirements and maintain record systems designed to comply with these requirements, including instructing necessary employees on pertinent aspects.

Deletion, falsification or destruction of significant or important records and information can have serious legal and business consequences both for the individual and for the company. At no time shall an employee, officer or director destroy or alter any document or record that may be the subject of any pending, threatened or likely claim, controversy or proceeding, whether investigative, administrative or judicial.

The audit process is an integral part of the Company’s financial controls and recordkeeping process and an essential requirement for public companies. No officer, director or employee shall:

  make or cause to be made a materially false statement or
  omit to state or cause another person to omit to state any material fact that is necessary in order to make statements made not misleading

17


to an accountant in connection with any audit, review or examination of the Company’s financial statements or securities filings. As well, no officer, director or employee shall directly or indirectly take any action to coerce, manipulate, mislead or fraudulently influence any accountant engaged in the performance of an audit or review of financial statements of the Company if such action could result in rendering the Company’s financial statements materially misleading.

Antitrust/Fair Competition

Nymox’s policy is to compete vigorously, aggressively, and successfully in today’s increasingly competitive business climate, and to do so at all times in compliance with all applicable antitrust and competition laws throughout the world.

Antitrust and competition law is a complex area and any questions about compliance should be raised with the Company’s General Counsel before proceeding.

Specific areas of concern are:

  price fixing and market division agreements with competitors.
  Discussions with competitors regarding customers, pricing policies, bids, discounts, promotions, terms and conditions of sale and any other proprietary or confidential information should be avoided. An unlawful agreement need not be written or even consist of express commitments. Agreements can be inferred based on “loose talk,” informal discussions, or the mere exchange of certain information.
  resale price maintenance where a good or service is sold with a stipulation that it cannot be resold for a price lower than a preset threshold.
  General Counsel should be consulted before entering into any agreement or arrangement that may have the effect of resale price maintenance.

Computer and Internet Use

The use of computers, the Internet and other advanced information technologies and resources are an important part of Nymox’s business.

In general, these resources are to be used solely for business purposes. Limited personal use may be acceptable if it does not interfere with job duties or company business and is not otherwise inconsistent with this Code of Business Conduct. These resources may not be used for personal gain, political purposes or solicitation of any kind.

18


The policies concerning confidentiality, privacy and corporate communications apply to computer and Internet communications such as email and messaging, Confidential, private or proprietary information of Nymox, or its employees, officers, customers, suppliers, or consultants should not be disclosed without proper authorization. No officer, employee or director shall at any time post any material, information or communication whatsoever on any chatline, chatroom or other such Internet or online forum devoted, in whole or in part, to the Company or its business.

These resources should never be used for illegal purposes, such as unauthorized downloading, uploading or sending copyrighted materials such as music or movies.

Good judgment should be used in sending information and message to others, both within and outside of the Company. Sending any information that could be insulting or offensive to another employee or other person, such as graphic, vulgar, violent, racially or sexually offensive materials or abusive, obscene, defamatory, harassing, discriminatory, derogatory, offensive, or threatening messages is prohibited.

All information on a Company computer, storage device or network, email or Internet server belongs to the Company and is not private. The Company reserves the right to access, use or disclosed or any information on Company computers or resources at any time for any reason to the full extent permitted by law. All passwords used to access a file, computer, email, Internet Service Provider, net work or other resources must be reported to a supervisor or to the CFO.

It is important that these resources be used properly. Users should ensure that system and antivirus software is kept up-to-date and that passwords and other information that may allow unauthorized access to the system are kept confidential and secure. Appropriate care should be taken in opening unsolicited email attachments. Unauthorized downloading of software and computer games is not permitted. Interfering with or disrupting the normal operation of Company computer systems, networks and resources is prohibited.

Reporting and Investigating Violations and Misconduct

Nymox operates an “open door” policy where all employees, officers and directors are encouraged to communicate their ideas and concerns directly to management. It is important that ideas and concerns be communicated promptly so that they may be addressed in a timely fashion. Working together in an atmosphere of trust and cooperation provides the most productive work environment.

Any employee, officer or director who knows or suspects that any activity, policy or practice of Nymox or any of its officers, employees or directors may be:

  a violation of any law, rule or regulation;
  illegal, criminal or fraudulent,

19


  a violation of this Code of Business Conduct or any other Company policy,
  unethical or incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy concerning the public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment, or
  questionable with regard to accounting, internal auditing controls or auditing matters related to Nymox

must report his or her concerns immediately to management or, if necessary, to the Company’s Audit Committee: see Appendix A. When in doubt about the best course of action in a particular situation, senior management or General Counsel should be consulted.

Reports or complaints of questionable accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters relating to Nymox are governed by the Audit Committee’s Complaints Handling Procedures outlined in Appendix A. Examples of such concerns include:

  fraud or deliberate error in the preparation, evaluation, review or audit of any Nymox financial statement;
  fraud or deliberate error in the recording and maintaining of Nymox's financial records;
  deficiencies in, or noncompliance with, Nymox's internal accounting controls;
  misrepresentation or false statement to, or by, a senior officer or accountant regarding a matter contained in Nymox’s financial records, financial reports or audit reports; or
  deviation from full and fair reporting of Nymox's financial condition.

An employee or officer may submit an anonymous and confidential complaint concerning questionable accounting or auditing matters to the Audit Committee as provided in Appendix A.

Nymox’s policies prohibit any retaliation, retribution or intimidation for any such reports of misconduct or violations made in good faith.

An officer, manager or supervisor receiving a report of a violation or suspected of this Code of Business Conduct or any legal or ethical requirement of misconduct is required to:

  1. promptly investigate the report or to refer the matter immediately to the company’s General Counsel for investigation,
  2. provide the report (if in writing) or the details of the report otherwise to the company’s General Counsel and to his or her supervisor or immediate superior,
  3. take any necessary reasonable action within the scope of his or her authority as is appropriate in the circumstance, and
  4. report what action was taken to the company’s General Counsel and to his or her supervisor or immediate superior along with any recommendations about how to detect, prevent or deal any such similar violations in the future.

Any complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters may also be forwarded to the Audit Committee in accordance with the Audit Committee Complaint Handling Procedure set out in Appendix A.

A violation of this Code of Business Conduct can result in disciplinary proceedings, including suspension, termination of employment or office or immediate dismissal. As well, violations that involve criminal or other illegal conduct may be reported to the appropriate government authorities for action.

20


Receipt and Review of the Code

I,                      , acknowledge that I have received a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and undertake to read and understand it.

I understand that I am expected to follow the Code of Business Conduct and that failure to comply with the provisions of the Code of Business Conduct may result in disciplinary action, including immediate dismissal.

I also understand that Nymox reserves the right to amend, alter or delete any of the policies in this Code of Business Conduct at any time for any reason and that I will be expected to comply with any such new or amended policies.

Date: ____________________ _______________________________________________
Signature


 
_______________________________________________
Name











21


Appendix A

Policies and Procedures about Handling Complaints Regarding Accounting, Internal Accounting Controls or AuditingMattersAudit
Committee, Board of Directors, Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation

1. Purpose

Integrity, accuracy, reliability, and honesty in financial reporting are key elements of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation’s obligations to its shareholders, employees, officers and directors.

These policies and procedures establish an effective mechanism for handling complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters. As such, they are an integral part of the Company’s commitment to compliance with all applicable securities laws and regulations, accounting standards, accounting controls and audit practices. They also form an important component of the Company’s internal controls designed to provide reliable financial reporting and the accurate and timely disclosure of material information about the Company.

2. Scope of these Policies and Procedures

These policies and procedures cover complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. Throughout this document these policies and procedures about handling complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to as the Complaint Handling Policy.

The Company refers to Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and its subsidiaries including Nymox Corporation and Serex, Inc.

The term “Complaint” refers to complaints regarding the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, including any questions concerning their integrity, accuracy, reliability and honesty. Specific examples of such Complaints include allegations concerning the Company or any of its employees, officers, directors or agents regarding:

  fraud;
  theft of Company property or funds;
  kickbacks or bribes;
  unauthorized payments, loans or other compensation (including shares in the Company);
  misallocation of the Company's revenues or expenditures for accounting purposes, such as mis-reporting of operating expenses as capital expenditures;
  forgery or fraudulent creation, alteration or destruction of purchase orders, contracts, invoices, checks and other financial documentation;

22


  payments for products and services never received
  interference with the conduct of a Company audit; and
  interference with the conduct of an investigation into a Complaint.

These examples are for illustration only and are not intended to be exhaustive of all possible Complaints.

A Complaint may be received from any employee, officer or director of the Company or from any third party such as the Company’s outside auditor, suppliers, contractors or regulators.

3. Responsibilities

A. Audit Committee

The Company’s Audit Committee has the overall responsibility for establishing and administering this Complaint Handling Policy, for receiving and investigating any Complaint and for reviewing the investigation and handling of Complaints.

The Audit Committee has the authority to direct an investigation be conducted into any Complaint regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters. The Audit Committee shall have the power and authority to retain and determine funding for independent counsel, accountants, or other advisors as it determines necessary to carry out any such investigation. The Committee may exercise this authority in response to specific circumstances that the Committee determines make such action to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. In addition, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel shall provide administrative support as directed by the Audit Committee.

B. Chairman of the Audit Committee

The Chairman of the Audit Committee has the primary responsibility for the investigation of Complaints involving allegations of misconduct or malfeasance against any member of senior management.

The Chairman may also, in his or her discretion, investigate other Complaints.

C. Chief Financial Officer

The Company’s Chief Financial Officer has the responsibility of conducting any necessary internal investigation of any Complaint not involving allegations of misconduct or malfeasance against any member of senior management.

The Chief Financial Officer shall report to the Audit Committee on a timely manner the details of all Complaints received or investigated by him or her, including the results of any investigations and resolutions of the Complaints.

23


D. Employees, Officers and Directors

All employees, officers and directors of the Company have the responsibility and obligation to report any Complaints or suspicions, allegations or concerns about the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters to their immediate supervisor, to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and/or to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

Any manager or employee in a supervisory capacity, officer or director of the Company who receives a Complaint has the responsibility of receiving, recording, and retaining the details of the Complaint and of referring the Complaint to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

4. Making a Complaint

Any person, whether or not a current employee, officer or director of the Company, may make a Complaint. An employee may make a Complaint to a supervisor, a senior officer or a director.

A Complaint may be made verbally or in writing. In general, it is preferable (but not required) that a Complaint be in writing, dated and with enough details to provide reasonable information about the nature of the Complaint and the transaction(s) and/or employee(s) or officer(s) complained about.

Complaints may be made anonymously and/or with a request for confidentiality.

A person wishing to make an anonymous Complaint may do so by submitting it in writing in a sealed envelope marked “Confidential” addressed to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer or directly to the Chairman of the Audit Committee or any other member of the Audit Committee. Anonymous complaints may also be made by telephone or email.

5. No Retaliation for Making a Complaint

No retaliation of any kind shall be taken against any employee who makes a Complaint.

In particular, the Company, its employees, officers, directors, agents or contractors shall not discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against any employee in the terms and conditions of employment because the employee made a Complaint.

6. Receiving a Complaint

Any employee, officer or director of the Company who receives a Complaint shall take all reasonable steps to record and preserve the Complaint.

24


Any envelopes marked “Confidential” addressed to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer or to the Chairman or other member of the Audit Committee shall be forwarded unopened to the addressee.

Complaints in writing shall be dated as of the date of receipt and initialed by the person receiving the Complaint.

A verbal Complaint shall be reduced to writing by the person receiving the Complaint as soon as possible in a note of the Complaint. The note should contain the date the Complaint was received, the name of the person receiving the Complaint and, if possible, enough details to provide reasonable information about the nature of the Complaint and the transaction(s) and/or employee(s) or officer(s) complained about. If possible, the person receiving the Complaint should read the note back to the person making the Complaint in order to confirm the nature and details of the Complaint.

Before referring a Complaint for investigation, the person receiving the Complaint shall make a copy of the Complaint and keep the copy stored in a safe and secure manner.

Complaints should be treated as confidential and only be disclosed in accordance with this Complaint Handling Policy.

7. Referral of Complaints for Investigation

In the normal course, an employee or officer receiving a Complaint from another employee shall promptly forward the Complaint to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

Complaints involving allegations of misconduct or malfeasance against any member of senior management shall be forwarded in a sealed envelope marked “Confidential” to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

A director or a member of the Audit Committee receiving a Complaint shall refer the Complaint to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

In exceptional circumstances, such as where the Complaint concerns a report of an imminent danger of loss or destruction of Company property, assets, financial records or funds, the person receiving such a Complaint may take immediate steps to prevent or mitigate such occurrences.

8. Investigation of Complaints

The Company’s Chief Financial Officer shall conduct the investigation of all Complaints received or referred to him or her other than Complaints involving allegations of misconduct or malfeasance against any member of senior management. Complaints involving allegations of misconduct or malfeasance against any member of senior management shall be forwarded in a sealed envelope marked “Confidential” to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

25


The Chairman of the Audit Committee shall conduct the investigation of all Complaints involving allegation(s) against any member of senior management. The Chairman may refer any Complaint received or referred to him or her not involving allegation(s) against senior management to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer for investigation.

The person conducting the initial investigation of a Complaint shall promptly:

  1. open an investigation file containing the Complaint and any records, files, notes and other documentation made concerning the Complaint;

  2. take reasonable steps to ensure that the contents of the investigation file are kept safe, secure and confidential;

  3. advise the Chairman and other members of the Audit Committee of the Complaint;

  4. conduct an initial screening of the Complaint to determine whether an investigation is required; and, if so determined,

  5. begin an investigation regarding the Complaint.

An investigation is not required for Complaints that on their face do not concern accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters. These complaints shall be referred to the appropriate employee, officer or director for any required action, if any, a note of this decision shall be included in the investigation file and the Audit Committee shall be advised of the decision.

An investigation is also not required for Complaints that are on their face patently frivolous. A note of this decision shall be included in the investigation file and the Audit Committee shall be advised of the decision.

All other Complaints shall be investigated in a timely and professional manner. A record of the investigation shall be kept in the investigation file along with any relevant documentation, interviews and other information or evidence.

All Complaints, investigative reports, records, interviews and other information and evidence relating to the investigation of the Complaint will be kept confidential to the extent possible, consistent with the need to conduct an adequate investigation.

The Chairman of the Audit Committee may, in consultation with the Audit Committee as a whole and with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (if not otherwise inappropriate), refer the investigation of a Complaint to an outside investigator, including the Company’s auditor, in appropriate circumstances.

26


The person conducting the investigation may contact the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or General Counsel to request information, assistance and support necessary to fairly investigate the Complaint.

All employees, officers and directors of the Company shall provide as directed or requested any information, assistance and support necessary to fairly investigate the Complaint. No employee, officer or director of the Company shall obstruct, impede or interfere with the conduct of the investigation of a Complaint.

Upon completion of an investigation not involving allegation(s) against a member of senior management, the person conducting the investigation shall report the results of the investigation to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer. The Company’s management shall take steps to promptly review the report and take any necessary corrective action.

Upon completion of an investigation involving allegation(s) against a member of senior management, the person conducting the investigation shall report the results of the investigation to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall review the results of the investigation and report any findings and recommended corrective actions to the Board of Directors and to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (if not otherwise inappropriate). Upon receipt of the Audit Committee’s report, the Board of Directors and/or the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer shall promptly review the report and take any necessary corrective action.

  9. Audit Committee Review of Complaint Handling

The Chief Financial Officer and the Chairman of the Audit Committee will provide the Audit Committee on a regular basis with the details and results of all ongoing and completed investigations of Complaints (including all Complaints that have been screened for no investigation) and any corrective actions taken. On request, the Audit Committee shall have access to the contents of any investigation file into a Complaint.

The Audit Committee shall have the right to investigate, review and/or re-investigate any Complaint and report any findings and recommended corrective actions to the Board of Directors and to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (if not otherwise inappropriate).

  10. Retention of Complaints and Investigative Files

All Complaints, the completed investigation files concerning any Complaints, the results of the investigation into Complaints, the minutes of any Audit Committee or Board meetings concerning any Complaint and any corrective actions taken in response to any Complaint shall be stored in the Company files and retained for six years.

27


11. Distribution of this Complaint Handling Policy

The Complaint Handling Policy shall be distributed to the Company’s employees, officers and directors and included as an appendix to any Code of Business Conduct adopted by the Company for its employees, officers and directors.
















28


Appendix B

Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers

Statement of Principle

Nymox is committed to maintaining the highest standard of moral and ethical behavior in its relationships with its stockholders, customers, suppliers, and partners and with the communities in which it conducts business. All employees, officers and directors are expected to conduct themselves professionally and in a manner that will enhance the reputation of the Company and its business and avoid even the appearance of improper personal or business conduct.

This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, applies to the Company’s chief executive officer (CEO) and the chief financial officer (CFO) as well as other senior officers of the Company and its subsidiaries who perform similar functions, and includes officers acting as a head of a subsidiary or an affiliate or in the capacity as comptroller or head of accounting (“Senior Financial Officers”). This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers supplements the Company’s Code of Business Conduct, which sets forth fundamental principles and key policies and procedures that govern the conduct of all of the members of the Board of Directors, officers and employees of our Company. Senior Financial Officers are bound by the requirements and guidelines set forth in the Code of Business Conduct, this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and other policies and procedures provided by the Company to its employees. For questions about the provisions of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, apparent conflicts between this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and applicable law, or your conduct or the conduct of others in a particular circumstance, the “Compliance Procedures” at the end of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers should be followed. Senior Financial Officers are expected to comply with this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, except in cases where an applicable law conflicts with the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. The provisions of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers will be vigorously enforced and violators will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.

Honest and Ethical Conduct

1. Compliance with Laws, Rules and Regulations

Senior Financial Officers are expected to carry out their responsibilities in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and in accordance with the highest standards of business ethics. Senior Financial Officers are expected to remain informed on laws and regulations applicable to their responsibilities and to ensure that those reporting to them are also informed. Advice in this regard should be sought from the Company’s General Counsel and other sources whenever appropriate.

29


2. Full and Fair Disclosure

Senior Financial Officers are expected to provide and to promote the disclosure of full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable Company information in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in all reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the NASDAQ Market, and other federal, state and provincial government or market regulatory bodies and in all other public communications made by the Company. In furtherance of the foregoing, Senior Financial Officers are responsible for ensuring that the Company’s books and records are maintained in accordance with applicable accounting policies, laws, rules and regulations; and establishing and maintaining internal controls and procedures and disclosure controls and procedures designed to assure that financial information is recorded, processed and transmitted to those responsible for preparing periodic reports and other public communications containing financial information so that they are complete, accurate and timely. No Senior Financial Officer shall take any action to unlawfully influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead the Company’s independent auditors for the purpose of rendering the Company’s audited financial statements materially misleading.

3. Conflicts of Interest

Senior Financial Officers are expected to avoid conflicts of interest situations. A conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s private interests interfere, or appear to interfere or conflict, in any way, with the interests of the Company, such as when the individual receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position with the company, or when the individual has other duties, responsibilities or obligations that run counter to his or her duty to the company. In addition to the conflicts of interest listed in the Code of Business Conduct, Senior Financial Officers must avoid the following actions that may give rise to a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest:

  accepting any benefits from the Company that have not been duly authorized and approved pursuant to Company policy and procedure;
  participating in a joint venture, partnership or other business arrangement with the Company or any of its affiliates, without the prior written approval of the Board; and
  accepting, directly or indirectly, money or benefits of any kind from a third party as compensation or payment for any advice or services provided to a client, supplier or anyone else in connection with its business with the Company.

Senior Financial Officers must disclose to the Board or General Counsel whenever a spouse or significant other, children, parents, or in-laws, or anyone else with whom the senior financial officer has a familial relationship, is an employee, officer, director, principal or major shareholder of competitor, customer or supplier of the Company (“Business Partner”). The Company will assess the extent of any conflict or appearance of conflict and how that issue may be resolved. The Company will refer the situation to the Audit Committee of the Board for review and approval, if appropriate. Senior Financial Officers must carefully guard against inadvertently disclosing the Company’s confidential information to any Business Partner or being involved in decisions on behalf of the Company concerning any such Business Partner.

30


Senior Financial Officers must disclose on an ongoing basis any existing, proposed or potential related party transactions between the Company and themselves or a Business Partner (or an enterprise controlled by either of them) to the Company for review for potential conflict of interest situations and referral to the Audit Committee if so required. All such transactions meeting the test of “related party transaction” under the applicable SEC, NASDAQ or other securities law rules must be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board.

It is not possible to list all situations in which a conflict of interest may exist or may appear to exist. The Company relies on the integrity and good judgment of Senior Financial Officers in these matters. If questions arise, Senior Financial Officers should consult with General Counsel. Any Senior Financial Officer who becomes aware of a conflict or potential conflict must bring it to the attention of the General Counsel or the Board.

4. Corporate Opportunities

A Senior Financial Officer violates his or her duty of loyalty to the Company if he or she personally profits from a business opportunity that rightfully belongs to the Company. Senior Financial Officers are prohibited from taking for themselves personally opportunities that are discovered through the use of corporate property, information or position without the prior written consent of the Company and approval of the Board. Senior Financial Officers may not use corporate property, information, or position for improper personal gain, and may not compete with the Company. In addition, Senior Financial Officers owe a duty to the Company to advance the Company’s legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises.

5. Confidentiality

Senior Financial Officers must maintain the confidentiality of non-public proprietary information entrusted to them by the Company or its customers or other parties with whom we do business, except when disclosure is authorized or legally required. The Company’s General Counsel or outside counsel can advise when disclosure is so authorized or required. This principle applies to all communications, whether oral, written or electronic. Examples of proprietary information are set forth in the Code of Business Conduct. In addition, all Senior Financial Officers are expected to fully understand and comply with the Company’s policies on the protection of proprietary information as set out in the Code of Business Conduct. It is important to remember that all employees, as a condition to employment, signed an agreement to maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s proprietary information and to use such information only in the course of employment. These obligations continue even after an employee leaves the Company.

6. Insider Trading

Senior Financial Officers who have access to material non-public information regarding the Company or any other entity are not permitted to use or share that information for purposes of trading securities of the Company or such other entity or for any other purpose except for the conduct of our business. All material non-public information should be considered confidential information. Senior Financial Officers must read and comply with the Company’s procedures and policies for trading in Company stock. In addition, all Senior Financial Officers must report all their trades and holdings in Company stock to the CFO and provide appropriate authorization for the reporting of such trades or holdings to the appropriate regulatory authority on a timely basis.

31


7. Fair Dealing

Senior Financial Officers are expected to respect and protect any confidential or proprietary information shared by customers, suppliers or others. No Senior Financial Officer acting on behalf of the Company should take unfair advantage of others through dishonest, unethical or illegal practices, including false or misleading statements.

8. Protection and Proper Use of Company Assets

All Senior Financial Officers should protect the Company’s assets, including its proprietary information, to ensure their efficient use. Theft, carelessness and waste have a direct impact on the Company’s profitability. All Company assets (including Company equipment) should be used only for legitimate business purposes. Any suspected incident of misuse of Company assets, fraud or theft should be immediately reported for investigation.

9. Loans, Expenses and Disbursements

Any proposed loans to a Senior Financial Officer must be vetted by the Audit Committee of the Board for compliance with legal requirements and corporate policy and approval. Any reimbursement of expenses or disbursements to a Senior Financial Officer or his or her family member must be pre-approved by the CFO. A Senior Financial Officer with signing authority over any of the accounts of the Company must get pre-approval from the CFO of any significant disbursement of funds from that account.

10. Encouraging the Reporting of any Illegal or Unethical Behavior

Senior Financial Officers are expected to promote ethical behavior and create a culture of compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. Senior Financial Officers should promote an environment in which the Company:

  encourages employees to communicate openly with supervisors, managers and other appropriate personnel when in doubt about the best course of action in a particular situation;
  encourages employees to report violations of laws, rules and regulations to appropriate personnel; an
  informs employees that the Company will not allow retaliation for reports made in good faith.

32


Compliance Procedures

1. Oversight

All employees, officers and directors must work to ensure compliance with this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and prompt and consistent action against violations. This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers sets forth certain general guidelines, and does not address every specific situation that may arise. General Counsel can provide guidance on interpreting and applying this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers as well as the Code of Business Conduct when questions arise.

2. Reports of Noncompliance

Senior Financial Officers must report suspected instances of violations of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers to the CEO, CFO or General Counsel, where appropriate. Reports of serious violations of law, rules or regulations involving the accounting or financial reporting of the Company, the trading in the Company’s stock or the safety of the Company’s products shall be made in writing and may be made anonymously, if necessary. If Senior Financial Officers are uncomfortable discussing these matters with the above-mentioned persons, they may report directly to any member of the Audit Committee of the Board.

Complaints regarding the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, including any questions concerning their integrity, accuracy, reliability and honesty are governed by the Company’s policies and procedures about handling complaints as established by the Audit Committee of the Board.

The Company will not allow retaliation for reports of misconduct made in good faith by Senior Financial Officers. In addition, Senior Financial Officers are free to speak to the General Counsel about questions arising from the provisions of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, apparent conflicts between this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and applicable law, or if in doubt about the best course of action to take in a particular situation.

3. Accountability

All reported violations of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers will be promptly investigated and dealt with. All such reports shall be treated confidentially to the fullest extent possible. Senior Financial Officers are expected to cooperate fully in any internal investigations of misconduct. Every reasonable effort will be made to prevent the occurrence of conduct not in compliance with this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and to halt and remediate any such conduct that may occur as soon as reasonably possible after its discovery.

Senior Financial Officers who violate this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, the Code of Business Conduct and/or other Company policies and procedures will be subject to disciplinary actions, up to and including termination of employment. In special cases, the Company may be obligated to refer violations of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers to appropriate law enforcement officials. Senior Financial Officers are expected to cooperate fully in any governmental investigation.

33


In addition, disciplinary measures, up to and including termination of employment, will be taken against any Senior Financial Officer who directs or approves infractions or violations of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, the Code of Business Conduct or other Company policies or procedures or has knowledge of them and does not promptly report and correct them in accordance with this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, the Code of Business Conduct or other applicable Company policies.

4. Amendments to and Waivers to the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers

Only the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors shall have the authority to grant or approve any waiver or substantive amendment of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. Waivers shall be granted only when truly necessary and warranted, and be subject to limitations and qualifications designed as to protect the Company to the greatest extent possible. Any such waiver along with the reasons for the waiver and any such amendment to this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers shall be disclosed promptly to the shareholders and the public, as required by law or regulation.









34

Exhibit 12(a)

CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Averback, President and CEO of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e)) for the company and we have:

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  c) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2004

/s/ Paul Averback, MD
Paul Averback, MD
President and Chief Executive Officer
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation

Exhibit 12(b)

CERTIFICATION

I, Roy Wolvin, CFO of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e)) for the company and we have:

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  c) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 30, 2004

/s/ Roy Wolvin
Roy Wolvin
Chief Financial Officer
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation

Exhibit 13(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Averback, President and CEO of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation.

Date: June 30, 2004

/s/ Paul Averback, MD
Paul Averback, MD
President and Chief Executive Officer
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation

Exhibit 13(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roy Wolvin, CFO of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation.

Date: June 30, 2004

/s/ Roy Wolvin
Roy Wolvin
Chief Financial Officer
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation