|
|
|
UNITED STATES |
||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
||
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORM 10-Q |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINNESOTA |
|
41-0957999 |
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Federal Employer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10900 Red Circle Drive, Minnetonka, MN |
|
55343 |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
|
(952) 996-1674 |
||
Registrants telephone number, including area code |
||
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer x Non-Accelerated Filer o Smaller Reporting Company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. YES o NO x
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Name of Exchange
|
|
Outstanding at November 1, 2014 |
Common Stock, par value
|
|
NASDAQ |
|
8,653,382 |
|
|
INDEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|
||||
Part I. |
Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS |
|
|
|
2
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
C
ONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
C
ONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
||||||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
33,433,924 |
|
$ |
44,616,873 |
|
$ |
91,841,307 |
|
$ |
104,006,206 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
21,421,424 |
|
|
30,993,686 |
|
|
58,747,022 |
|
|
69,078,776 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9,354,599 |
|
|
9,468,972 |
|
|
28,044,957 |
|
|
27,835,588 |
|
Impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
5,849,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,849,853 |
|
Restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,838 |
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
30,776,023 |
|
|
46,312,511 |
|
|
87,029,817 |
|
|
102,764,217 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,657,901 |
|
|
(1,695,638 |
) |
|
4,811,490 |
|
|
1,241,989 |
|
Other income and (expenses) : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other income |
|
|
62,843 |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
96,867 |
|
|
122,070 |
|
Gain/(loss) on sale of assets |
|
|
30,331 |
|
|
(33,388 |
) |
|
(105,799 |
) |
|
(78,065 |
) |
Interest and other expense |
|
|
(17,467 |
) |
|
(26,644 |
) |
|
(58,513 |
) |
|
(82,487 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
75,707 |
|
|
(60,104 |
) |
|
(67,445 |
) |
|
(38,482 |
) |
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes |
|
|
2,733,608 |
|
|
(1,755,742 |
) |
|
4,744,045 |
|
|
1,203,507 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,038,707 |
|
|
280,191 |
|
|
1,752,243 |
|
|
1,358,525 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
1,694,901 |
|
|
(2,035,933 |
) |
|
2,991,802 |
|
|
(155,018 |
) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability adjustments |
|
|
(76,971 |
) |
|
179,450 |
|
|
(255,761 |
) |
|
(26,624 |
) |
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(31,999 |
) |
|
12,193 |
|
|
(46,609 |
) |
|
(18,353 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(225,050 |
) |
|
197,918 |
|
|
(142,506 |
) |
|
(141,754 |
) |
Total other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(334,020 |
) |
|
389,561 |
|
|
(444,876 |
) |
|
(186,731 |
) |
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,360,881 |
|
$ |
(1,646,372 |
) |
$ |
2,546,926 |
|
$ |
(341,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Weighted Average Basic Shares Outstanding |
|
|
8,641,853 |
|
|
8,547,563 |
|
|
8,609,835 |
|
|
8,524,045 |
|
Weighted Average Dilutive Shares Outstanding |
|
|
8,663,142 |
|
|
8,550,227 |
|
|
8,631,985 |
|
|
8,531,017 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
C
ONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Total |
|
||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2013 |
|
|
8,553,320 |
|
$ |
427,666 |
|
$ |
37,110,671 |
|
$ |
51,323,718 |
|
$ |
(240,012 |
) |
$ |
88,622,043 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,991,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,991,802 |
|
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
9,846 |
|
|
492 |
|
|
119,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,822 |
|
Issuance of common stock to Employee Stock Ownership Plan |
|
|
32,520 |
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
360,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,273 |
|
Issuance of common stock under Non-Employee Stock Option Plan |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
98,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,360 |
|
Issuance of common stock under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Stock Plan |
|
|
42,201 |
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
Tax benefit from stock based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,194 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518,682 |
|
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
(70 |
) |
|
(6,215 |
) |
|
(10,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(16,675 |
) |
Shareholder dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,183,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4,183,561 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444,876 |
) |
|
(444,876 |
) |
BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 |
|
|
8,648,481 |
|
$ |
432,424 |
|
$ |
38,269,069 |
|
$ |
50,121,569 |
|
$ |
(684,888 |
) |
$ |
88,138,174 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
C
ONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,991,802 |
|
$ |
(155,018 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,756,792 |
|
|
1,627,804 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
518,682 |
|
|
7,763 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
538,335 |
|
|
(693,619 |
) |
Impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
5,849,853 |
|
Change in fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
(352,462 |
) |
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
105,799 |
|
|
78,065 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payments |
|
|
(67,194 |
) |
|
(13,562 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
6,279,960 |
|
|
(22,042,463 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(1,979,772 |
) |
|
5,187,881 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
443,330 |
|
|
2,126,683 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(69,651 |
) |
|
106,675 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,061,120 |
|
|
(4,243,547 |
) |
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
(201,385 |
) |
|
560,605 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(106,111 |
) |
|
161,650 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(14,585 |
) |
|
(38,272 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(86,662 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
11,170,460 |
|
|
(11,831,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(3,987,901 |
) |
|
(1,977,058 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(11,059,893 |
) |
|
(2,824,848 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets |
|
|
48,299 |
|
|
56,394 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of investments |
|
|
4,980,000 |
|
|
9,794,000 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(10,019,495 |
) |
|
5,048,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(4,186,764 |
) |
|
(2,730,265 |
) |
Mortgage principal payments |
|
|
(364,135 |
) |
|
(340,161 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
221,292 |
|
|
247,178 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payments |
|
|
67,194 |
|
|
13,562 |
|
Payment of contingent consideration related to acquisition |
|
|
(565,647 |
) |
|
(161,060 |
) |
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
(16,675 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(4,844,735 |
) |
|
(2,970,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
|
(34,417 |
) |
|
(11,612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(3,728,187 |
) |
|
(9,765,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
20,059,120 |
|
|
17,869,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
16,330,933 |
|
$ |
8,103,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunded) |
|
$ |
752,787 |
|
$ |
(85,297 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
58,513 |
|
|
79,293 |
|
Dividends declared not paid |
|
|
1,433,115 |
|
|
1,367,724 |
|
Capital expenditures in accounts payable |
|
|
83,102 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
Communications Systems, Inc. (herein collectively called CSI or the Company) is a Minnesota corporation organized in 1969 that operates primarily as a holding company conducting its business through three business units having operations in the United States, Costa Rica, and the United Kingdom. Through its Suttle business unit, the Company is principally engaged in the manufacture and sale of copper and fiber connectivity systems, enclosure systems, and active technologies for voice, data and video communications. Through its Transition Networks business unit, the Company is engaged in the manufacture of network interface devices, media converters, network interface cards, Ethernet switches and other connectivity products that offer the ability to affordably integrate the benefits of fiber optics into any data network. Through its JDL Technologies business unit, the Company provides technology solutions including virtualization, managed services, wired and wireless network design and implementation, HIPAA-compliant IT services, and converged infrastructure configuration and deployment.
Financial Statement Presentation
The condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity as of September 30, 2014 and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 have been prepared by Company management. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments, except where noted) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows at September 30, 2014 and 2013 and for the periods then ended have been made.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. We recommend these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys December 31, 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year.
The presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The estimates and assumptions used in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are based upon managements evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the time of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
Except to the extent updated or described below, the significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of accounting policies, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue. The new standard will result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. The standard is effective for our reporting year beginning January 1, 2017 and early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, this new accounting pronouncement will have on our financial statements.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Foreign currency translation |
|
$ |
(2,180,000 |
) |
$ |
(2,038,000 |
) |
Unrealized (loss)/gain on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
2,000 |
|
Pension liability adjustment |
|
|
1,540,000 |
|
|
1,796,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
(685,000 |
) |
$ |
(240,000 |
) |
NOTE 2 CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS
The following tables show the Companys cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value by significant investment category recorded as cash and cash equivalents or short and long term investments as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|||||||
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market funds |
|
$ |
6,002,989 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6,002,989 |
|
$ |
6,002,989 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
6,002,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,002,989 |
|
|
6,002,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
6,208,172 |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
(16,419 |
) |
|
6,192,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,923,144 |
|
|
4,269,715 |
|
Corporate Notes/Bonds |
|
|
9,517,010 |
|
|
11,028 |
|
|
(24,320 |
) |
|
9,503,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,701,613 |
|
|
6,802,105 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
15,725,182 |
|
|
12,134 |
|
|
(40,739 |
) |
|
15,696,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,624,757 |
|
|
11,071,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,728,171 |
|
$ |
12,134 |
|
$ |
(40,739 |
) |
$ |
21,699,566 |
|
$ |
6,002,989 |
|
$ |
4,624,757 |
|
$ |
11,071,820 |
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|||||||
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market funds |
|
$ |
5,751,965 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,751,965 |
|
$ |
5,751,965 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
5,751,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,751,965 |
|
|
5,751,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,024,031 |
|
|
687 |
|
|
(4,992 |
) |
|
4,019,726 |
|
|
239,904 |
|
|
2,582,502 |
|
|
1,197,320 |
|
Corporate Notes/Bonds |
|
|
5,861,162 |
|
|
22,830 |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
5,883,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,159,812 |
|
|
2,723,658 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
9,885,193 |
|
|
23,517 |
|
|
(5,514 |
) |
|
9,903,196 |
|
|
239,904 |
|
|
5,742,314 |
|
|
3,920,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,637,158 |
|
$ |
23,517 |
|
$ |
(5,514 |
) |
$ |
15,655,161 |
|
$ |
5,991,869 |
|
$ |
5,742,314 |
|
$ |
3,920,978 |
|
The Company tests for other than temporary losses on a quarterly basis and has considered the unrealized losses indicated above to be temporary in nature. The Company intends to hold the investments until it can recover the full principal amount and has the ability to do so based on other sources of liquidity. The Company expects these recoveries to occur prior to the contractual maturities. All unrealized losses as of September 30, 2014 were in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and are not deemed to be other than temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2014.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of our investments, designated as available-for-sale and classified by the contractual maturity date of the securities as of September 30, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Estimated Market Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Due within one year |
|
$ |
4,617,044 |
|
$ |
4,624,757 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
11,108,138 |
|
|
11,071,820 |
|
|
|
$ |
15,725,182 |
|
$ |
15,696,577 |
|
The Company did not recognize any gross realized gains, and gross realized losses were immaterial, during the nine-month periods ending September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. If the Company had realized gains or losses, they would be included within investment and other income in the accompanying consolidated results of operations.
9
NOTE 3 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), employees are able to acquire shares of common stock at 90% of the price at the end of each current quarterly plan term. The most recent term ended September 30, 2014. The ESPP is considered compensatory under current Internal Revenue Service rules. At September 30, 2014, after giving effect to the shares issued as of that date, 25,741 shares remain available for purchase under the ESPP.
2011 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan
On March 28, 2011 the Board adopted and on May 19, 2011 the Companys shareholders approved the Companys 2011 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (2011 Incentive Plan). The 2011 Incentive Plan authorizes incentive awards to officers, key employees and non-employee directors in the form of options (incentive and non-qualified), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units (deferred stock), performance cash units, and other awards in stock, cash, or a combination of stock and cash. Up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan.
During 2014, stock options covering 317,722 shares were awarded to key executive employees and directors, which options expire seven years from the date of award and vest 25% each year beginning one year after the date of award. The Company also granted deferred stock awards of 43,824 shares to key employees during 2014 under the Companys long-term incentive plan that vest over three years with the first vesting period at March 28, 2015.
At September 30, 2014, 46,643 shares have been issued under the 2011 Incentive Plan, 692,972 shares are subject to currently outstanding options, deferred stock awards, and unvested restricted stock units, and 260,385 shares are eligible for grant under future awards.
Stock Option Plan for Directors
Shares of common stock are reserved for issuance to non-employee directors under options granted by the Company prior to 2011 under its Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the Director Plan). Under the Director Plan nonqualified stock options to acquire shares of common stock were automatically granted to each non-employee director concurrent with annual meetings of shareholders in 2010 and earlier years, with the exercise price of options granted being the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the respective shareholder meetings. Options granted under the Director Plan expire 10 years from date of grant.
No options were granted under the Director Plan in 2013 or 2014. The Director Plan was amended as of May 19, 2011 to prohibit option grants in 2011 and future years.
1992 Stock Plan
Under the Companys 1992 Stock Plan (the Stock Plan), shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to stock options, restricted stock or deferred stock grants to officers and key employees. Exercise prices of stock options under the Stock Plan cannot be less than fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Rules and conditions governing awards of stock options, restricted stock and deferred stock are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to certain limitations in the Stock Plan. When seeking approval of the 2011 Incentive Plan at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Company committed to amending the Stock Plan to prohibit the issuance of future equity awards if such approval was given. Effective August 11, 2011, the amendment to prohibit future stock options or other equity awards was approved by the Board.
10
At September 30, 2014, after reserving for stock options and deferred stock awards granted in prior years and adjusting for forfeitures and issuances during the year, there were 22,008 shares reserved for issuance under the Stock Plan. The Company has not awarded stock options or deferred stock under this plan in 2013 or 2014.
Changes in Stock Options Outstanding
The following table summarizes changes in the number of outstanding stock options under the 2011 Incentive Plan, the Director Plan and Stock Plan over the period December 31, 2013 to September 30, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted average
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|||
Outstanding December 31, 2013 |
|
|
309,439 |
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
4.13 |
|
Awarded |
|
|
317,722 |
|
|
12.30 |
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
8.28 |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(74,757 |
) |
|
13.05 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding September 30, 2014 |
|
|
540,404 |
|
|
11.90 |
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2014 |
|
|
214,233 |
|
$ |
11.91 |
|
|
3.33 |
|
Expected to vest September 30, 2014 |
|
|
540,404 |
|
|
11.90 |
|
|
5.38 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of all options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the last day of the period exceeded the market price of the stock on the date of grant) outstanding at September 30, 2014 was $133,000. The intrinsic value of all options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $40,000. Net cash proceeds from the exercise of all stock options were $99,000 and $110,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Changes in Deferred Stock Outstanding
The following table summarizes the changes in the number of deferred stock shares under the Stock Plan and 2011 Incentive Plan over the period December 31, 2013 to September 30, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted Average
|
|
||
Outstanding December 31, 2013 |
|
|
200,140 |
|
$ |
11.47 |
|
Granted |
|
|
48,824 |
|
|
12.52 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
|
14.10 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(9,353 |
) |
|
10.91 |
|
Outstanding September 30, 2014 |
|
|
224,357 |
|
|
11.55 |
|
11
Changes in Restricted Stock Units Outstanding
The following table summarizes the changes in the number of restricted stock units under the 2011 Incentive Plan over the period December 31, 2013 to September 30, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted Average
|
|
||
Outstanding December 31, 2013 |
|
|
53,193 |
|
$ |
10.44 |
|
Granted |
|
|
13,973 |
|
|
11.98 |
|
Vested |
|
|
26,947 |
|
|
10.85 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding September 30, 2014 |
|
|
94,113 |
|
|
10.70 |
|
Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense recognized for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 was $519,000 before income taxes and $337,000 after income taxes. Share-based compensation expense recognized for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013 was $8,000 before income taxes and $5,000 after income taxes. Unrecognized compensation expense for the Companys plans was $1,093,000 at September 30, 2014 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options and issuance of stock included in financing cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $67,000 and $14,000, respectively. Share-based compensation expense is recorded as a part of selling, general and administrative expenses.
NOTE 4 - INVENTORIES
Inventories summarized below are priced at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
$ |
18,620,400 |
|
$ |
18,733,636 |
|
Raw and processed materials |
|
|
12,458,462 |
|
|
10,378,020 |
|
|
|
$ |
31,078,862 |
|
$ |
29,111,656 |
|
NOTE 5 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill is required to be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests upon the occurrence of certain events or circumstances. A two-step process is performed to analyze whether or not goodwill has been impaired. Step one is to test for potential impairment, and requires that the fair value of the reporting unit be compared to its book value including goodwill. If the fair value is higher than the book value, no impairment is recognized. If the fair value is lower than the book value, a second step must be performed. The second step is to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any, and requires that a hypothetical purchase price allocation be done to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. This fair value is then compared to the carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value is lower than the carrying value, an impairment adjustment must be recorded.
12
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, due to the loss of key personnel and the continued decline in year-over-year revenues due primarily to continued slowdown in domestic government spending as well as a decline in sales of its legacy products, management concluded that these events and circumstances were indicators to require us to perform an interim goodwill impairment analysis of our Transition Networks reporting unit. This analysis included the determination of the reporting units fair value primarily using discounted cash flows modeling. Based on the step one and step two analysis, considering Transition Networks reduced earnings and cash flow forecasts, the Company determined that Transition Networks goodwill was fully impaired and recorded a goodwill impairment for this segment of $5,850,000.
The Companys identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are being amortized over their estimated useful lives and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2014 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Gross
Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Foreign
Currency
|
|
Net |
|
||||
Trademarks |
|
|
81,785 |
|
|
(36,707 |
) |
|
(591 |
) |
|
44,487 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
490,707 |
|
|
(154,302 |
) |
|
(3,543 |
) |
|
332,862 |
|
Technology |
|
|
228,996 |
|
|
(143,891 |
) |
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
83,452 |
|
|
|
|
801,488 |
|
|
(334,900 |
) |
|
(5,787 |
) |
|
460,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Gross
Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Foreign
Currency
|
|
Net |
|
||||
Trademarks |
|
|
81,785 |
|
|
(17,262 |
) |
|
(10,545 |
) |
|
53,978 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
490,707 |
|
|
(72,500 |
) |
|
(43,105 |
) |
|
375,102 |
|
Technology |
|
|
228,996 |
|
|
(67,667 |
) |
|
(42,066 |
) |
|
119,263 |
|
|
|
|
801,488 |
|
|
(157,429 |
) |
|
(95,716 |
) |
|
548,343 |
|
Amortization expense on these identifiable intangible assets was $81,000 and $76,000 in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The amortization expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. At September 30, 2014, the estimated future amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets for the remainder of 2014 and all of the following four fiscal years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
109,000 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
57,000 |
|
NOTE 6 WARRANTY
We provide reserves for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We estimate the costs of our warranty obligations based on our warranty policy or applicable contractual warranty, historical experience of known product failure rates, and use of materials and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. Management reviews the estimated warranty liability on a quarterly basis to determine its adequacy. The actual warranty expense could differ from the estimates made by the Company based on product performance.
13
The following table presents the changes in the Companys warranty liability for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, the majority of which relates to a five-year obligation to provide for potential future liabilities for network equipment sales.
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
564,000 |
|
$ |
590,000 |
|
Amounts charged to expense |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
185,000 |
|
Actual warranty costs paid |
|
|
(97,000 |
) |
|
(191,000 |
) |
Ending balance |
|
$ |
476,000 |
|
$ |
584,000 |
|
NOTE 7 CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to legal actions and claims and incurs costs to defend against these actions and claims. Company management is not aware of any outstanding or pending legal actions or claims that could materially affect the Companys financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 8 INCOME TAXES
In the preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements, management calculates income taxes based upon the estimated effective rate applicable to operating results for the full fiscal year. This includes estimating the current tax liability as well as assessing differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and book accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on the balance sheet. These assets and liabilities are analyzed regularly and management assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income.
At September 30, 2014 there was $239,000 of net uncertain tax benefit positions that would reduce the effective income tax rate if recognized. The Company records interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The tax years 2011-2013 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and the years 2010-2013 remain open to examination by various state tax departments. During the second quarter, the IRS completed an examination of our 2011 federal income tax return. There were no material changes to the return as filed. The tax years from 2011-2013 remain open in Costa Rica.
The Companys effective income tax rate was 36.9% for the first nine months of 2014. The effective tax rate differs from the federal tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, provisions for interest charges for uncertain income tax positions, and settlement of uncertain tax positions. The foreign operating losses may ultimately be deductible in the countries in which they have occurred; however the Company has not recorded a deferred tax asset for these losses due to uncertainty regarding the eventual realization of the benefit. The effect of the foreign operations was an overall rate increase of approximately 2.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. There were no additional uncertain tax positions identified in the first nine months of 2014. The Companys effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was 112.9%, and differed from the federal tax rate due to state income taxes, return to provision adjustments, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, provisions for interest charges for uncertain income tax positions, the effect of operations conducted in lower foreign tax rate jurisdictions, the release of contingent consideration from the Companys 2011 acquisition and goodwill impairment not deductible for income tax purposes.
14
NOTE 9 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Effective January 1, 2014, the Company realigned the financial reporting for its business units. As a result of this realignment, all corporate general and administrative expenses that were previously categorized as Other are now included within the three business units as fully allocated costs. The Company classifies its businesses into three segments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle manufactures and markets copper and fiber connectivity systems, enclosure systems, xDSL filters and splitters, and active technologies for voice, data and video communications; |
|
|
Transition Networks manufactures network interface devices (NIDs), media converters, network interface cards (NICs), Ethernet switches and other connectivity products that offer the ability to affordably integrate the benefits of fiber optics into any data network; and |
|
|
JDL Technologies provides technology solutions including virtualization, managed services, wired and wireless network design and implementation, HIPAA-compliant IT services, and converged infrastructure configuration and deployment. |
Management has chosen to organize the enterprise and disclose reportable segments based on our products and services. There are no material inter-segment revenues. In order to conform to the 2014 presentation, the Company has reclassified the previously non-allocated corporate expenses within the business segments.
Information concerning the Companys continuing operations in the various segments for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle |
|
|
Transition
|
|
|
JDL
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
19,938,286 |
|
$ |
11,271,838 |
|
$ |
2,223,800 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
33,433,924 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
13,470,968 |
|
|
6,282,820 |
|
|
1,667,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
21,421,424 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
6,467,318 |
|
|
4,989,018 |
|
|
556,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,012,500 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,643,668 |
|
|
5,031,880 |
|
|
679,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,354,599 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
2,823,650 |
|
$ |
(42,862 |
) |
$ |
(122,887 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,657,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
331,942 |
|
$ |
242,712 |
|
$ |
38,866 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
613,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
1,262,856 |
|
$ |
87,708 |
|
$ |
4,818 |
|
$ |
169,287 |
|
$ |
1,524,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
39,398,241 |
|
$ |
26,652,267 |
|
$ |
2,764,071 |
|
$ |
33,762,011 |
|
$ |
102,576,590 |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle |
|
|
Transition
|
|
|
JDL
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
14,838,164 |
|
$ |
10,881,569 |
|
$ |
18,897,140 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
44,616,873 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
9,861,311 |
|
|
5,716,712 |
|
|
15,415,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
30,993,686 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
4,976,853 |
|
|
5,164,857 |
|
|
3,481,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,623,187 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,288,969 |
|
|
5,165,239 |
|
|
1,014,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,468,972 |
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,849,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,849,853 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,687,884 |
|
$ |
(5,850,235 |
) |
$ |
2,466,713 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(1,695,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
265,278 |
|
$ |
257,426 |
|
$ |
46,446 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
569,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
338,414 |
|
$ |
251,757 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
80,306 |
|
$ |
670,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
29,786,727 |
|
$ |
28,702,749 |
|
$ |
21,711,436 |
|
$ |
24,650,614 |
|
$ |
104,851,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle |
|
|
Transition
|
|
|
JDL
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
51,826,860 |
|
$ |
32,588,539 |
|
$ |
7,425,908 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
91,841,307 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
35,594,164 |
|
|
17,507,487 |
|
|
5,645,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
58,747,022 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
16,232,696 |
|
|
15,081,052 |
|
|
1,780,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
33,094,285 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
10,139,487 |
|
|
15,820,650 |
|
|
2,084,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
28,044,957 |
|
Restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
237,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,838 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,093,209 |
|
$ |
(977,436 |
) |
$ |
(304,283 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,811,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
939,910 |
|
$ |
704,130 |
|
$ |
112,752 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,756,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
3,127,566 |
|
$ |
453,345 |
|
$ |
22,834 |
|
$ |
384,156 |
|
$ |
3,987,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle |
|
|
Transition
|
|
|
JDL
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
41,102,681 |
|
$ |
32,156,461 |
|
$ |
30,747,064 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
104,006,206 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
28,948,153 |
|
|
15,595,728 |
|
|
24,534,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
69,078,776 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,154,528 |
|
|
16,560,733 |
|
|
6,212,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
34,927,430 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
8,644,047 |
|
|
16,781,873 |
|
|
2,409,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,835,588 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
5,849,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,849,853 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,510,481 |
|
$ |
(6,070,993 |
) |
$ |
3,802,501 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,241,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
784,600 |
|
$ |
717,591 |
|
$ |
125,613 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,627,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
777,196 |
|
$ |
752,732 |
|
$ |
15,361 |
|
$ |
431,769 |
|
$ |
1,977,058 |
|
16
NOTE 10 PENSIONS
The Companys U.K. based subsidiary Austin Taylor maintains defined benefit pension plans. The Company does not provide any other post-retirement benefits to its employees. Components of net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans for the three-months and nine-months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
||||||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
77,000 |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
$ |
206,000 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
113,000 |
|
|
183,000 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(44,000 |
) |
|
(73,000 |
) |
|
(145,000 |
) |
|
(196,000 |
) |
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost |
|
$ |
(9,000 |
) |
$ |
72,000 |
|
$ |
(28,000 |
) |
$ |
193,000 |
|
NOTE 11 NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted net income per common share takes into effect the dilutive effect of potential common shares outstanding. The Companys only potential common shares outstanding are stock options and shares associated with the long-term incentive compensation plans, which resulted in a dilutive effect of 21,289 and 22,150 shares for the three and nine-months ended 2014, respectively. The dilutive effect of stock options for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 was 2,664 shares and 6,972 shares, respectively. The Company calculates the dilutive effect of outstanding options using the treasury stock method. Options totaling 198,703 and 391,926 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of common stock during the period and deferred stock awards totaling 171,544 shares were not included for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2014 because of unmet performance conditions. Options totaling 155,014 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the nine-months ended September 30, 2013 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of common stock during the period and deferred stock awards totaling 241,623 shares were not included for the nine-months ended September 30, 2013 because of unmet performance conditions.
NOTE 12 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The accounting guidance establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments and quoted prices in markets that are not active, and inputs that are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, such as treasury securities with pricing interpolated from recent trades of similar securities, or priced with models using highly observable inputs, such as commodity options priced using observable forward prices and volatilities.
Level 3 Significant inputs to pricing that have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as the complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value of financial instruments.
17
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2014 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total Fair Value |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market funds |
|
$ |
6,002,989 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6,002,989 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
6,002,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,002,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
1,923,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,923,144 |
|
Corporate Notes/Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2,701,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,701,613 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
4,624,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,624,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
4,269,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,269,715 |
|
Corporate Notes/Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
6,802,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,802,105 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
11,071,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,071,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,002,989 |
|
$ |
15,696,577 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
21,699,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total Fair Value |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market funds |
|
$ |
5,751,965 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,751,965 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
239,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
239,904 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
5,751,965 |
|
|
239,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,991,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
2,582,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,582,502 |
|
Corporate Notes/Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3,159,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,159,812 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
5,742,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,742,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
1,197,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,197,320 |
|
Corporate Notes/Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2,723,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,723,658 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
3,920,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,920,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(558,801 |
) |
|
(558,801 |
) |
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(558,801 |
) |
|
(558,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,751,965 |
|
$ |
9,903,196 |
|
$ |
(558,801 |
) |
$ |
15,096,360 |
|
18
The change in the estimated contingent consideration during the nine months was due to $565,647 in payments and $6,846 in foreign currency gains.
We record transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy, if necessary, at the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers between levels during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
NOTE 13 RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded $238,000 in restructuring expense. This consisted of severance and related benefits costs due to the restructuring within the Transition Networks business segment, including ongoing costs related to the closure of the China facility. The facility was completely closed in the second quarter of 2014. The Company paid $724,000 in restructuring charges during the first nine months of 2014 related to accruals at the end of 2013 as well as new charges in 2014 and had $0 in restructuring accruals recorded in accrued compensation and benefits at September 30, 2014.
NOTE 14 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing. We do not believe there are any material subsequent events that would require further disclosure.
19
I tem 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Communications Systems, Inc. provides physical connectivity infrastructure and services for global deployments of broadband networks through the following business units:
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle manufactures and markets copper and fiber connectivity systems, enclosure systems, xDSL filters and splitters, and active technologies for voice, data and video communications under the Suttle brand in the United States and internationally; |
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks manufactures network interface devices (NIDs), media converters, network interface cards (NICs), Ethernet switches, and other connectivity products that offer customers the ability to affordably integrate fiber optics into any data network; and |
|
|
|
|
|
JDL Technologies provides technology solutions including virtualization, managed services, wired and wireless network design and implementation, HIPAA-compliant IT services, and converged infrastructure configuration and deployment. |
Third Quarter 2014 Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated sales of $33.4 million compared to $44.6 million in Q3 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Suttle sales grew 34% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Transition Networks sales rose 4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
JDL Technologies sales declined 88% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit of $12.0 million, or 36% of revenues, compared to gross profit of $13.6 million, or 31% of revenues, in Q3 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income improved to $2.7 million from an operating loss of $1.7 million in Q3 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Suttle operating income grew 67% to $2.8 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Transition Networks operating loss was $43,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
JDL Technologies operating loss was $123,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income was $1.7 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $2.0 million, or ($0.24) per diluted share, in Q3 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments increased to $32.0 million at September 30, 2014 from $29.7 million at December 31, 2013. |
20
Forward-looking statements
In this report and, from time to time, in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases, and in other communications to shareholders or the investing public, the Company may make forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning possible or anticipated future financial performance, business activities, plans, pending claims, investigations or litigation which are typically preceded by the words believes, expects, anticipates, intends or similar expressions. For these forward-looking statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in federal securities laws. Shareholders and the investing public should understand that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance, activities, anticipated results, outcomes or plans to differ significantly from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
General Risks and Uncertainties;
|
|
|
|
|
The success of the holding company restructuring plan that we implemented in September 2013; |
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of the CSI parent to oversee the Companys three operating units function in an efficient and cost-effective manner; |
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of our three business operating units to operate profitably; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of changing economic circumstances on government expenditures in our markets. |
Suttle Risks and Uncertainties:
|
|
|
|
|
Suttles dependence upon its sales to major communication service providers and their continued investment and deployment into building out their networks; |
|
|
|
|
|
Suttles ability to continue to introduce and sell new G.hn products and FTTx (fiber-to-the-home or node) products; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the continued recovery of the housing market in the United States. |
Transition Networks Risks and Uncertainties:
|
|
|
|
|
The ability of Transition Networks to develop and introduce new products into new and existing markets at a level adequate to counter the decline from its traditional products and markets; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks ability to profitably penetrate certain international markets. |
JDL Technologies Risks and Uncertainties:
|
|
|
|
|
JDLs ability to continue to obtain business from its traditional South Florida school districts; |
|
|
|
|
|
JDLs ability to profitably expand outside its South Florida education market to small and medium sized commercial businesses; and |
|
|
|
|
|
JDLs ability to establish and maintain a productive and efficient workforce in light of revenues that have fluctuated significantly from period to period, in part due to the uncertainty and timing of federal government funding of school initiatives. |
In addition, the Company will discuss other factors from time to time in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including risk factors presented under Item 1A of the Companys most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K or quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
21
Company Results
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Compared to
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Consolidated sales decreased 25% in 2014 to $33,434,000 compared to $44,617,000 in 2013. Consolidated operating income in 2014 increased to $2,658,000 compared to an operating loss of $1,696,000 in the third quarter of 2013. Net income in 2014 increased to $1,695,000 or $0.20 per share compared to a net loss of $2,036,000 or $ (0.24) per share in the third quarter of 2013.
Method of Presentation
Effective January 1, 2014, the Company realigned the financial reporting for its business units to reflect its move to a holding company business structure that supports self-sustaining business units and to provide increased focus on opportunities to cut indirect corporate charges. As a result of this realignment, all corporate general and administrative expenses that were previously categorized as Other in Company financial statements are now included within the business unit level as fully allocated costs in this Form 10-Q. The Company has reclassified its 2013 results to conform to this new format.
Suttle Results
Suttle sales increased 34% in the third quarter of 2014 to $19,938,000 compared to $14,838,000 in the same period of 2013 due largely to revenue generated from new FTTx (fiber to the home or node) product platforms. Sales by customer groups in the third quarter of 2014 and 2013 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Communication service providers |
|
$ |
17,446,000 |
|
$ |
12,422,000 |
|
Distributors |
|
|
1,578,000 |
|
|
1,417,000 |
|
International |
|
|
873,000 |
|
|
922,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
77,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,938,000 |
|
$ |
14,838,000 |
|
Suttles sales by product groups in third quarter of 2014 and 2013 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Product Group |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Modular connecting products |
|
$ |
3,586,000 |
|
$ |
4,012,000 |
|
Structured cabling products |
|
|
9,047,000 |
|
|
7,647,000 |
|
DSL products |
|
|
1,431,000 |
|
|
1,829,000 |
|
FTTx products |
|
|
5,828,000 |
|
|
1,212,000 |
|
Other products |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,938,000 |
|
$ |
14,838,000 |
|
Sales to the major communication service providers increased 40% in 2014 due to growth in core high-speed copper connectivity products and success in securing new business in multiple FTTx domains. Sales to major communication service providers accounted for 88% of Suttles sales in the third quarter of 2014 compared to 84% of sales in 2013. Sales to distributors increased 11% in 2014 due to growth in high speed copper connectivity products. This customer segment accounted for 8% and 10% of sales in the third quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. International sales decreased 5% and accounted for 4% of Suttles third quarter 2014 sales, due to a reduction in revenue from Austin Taylor legacy products, in part due to the Companys termination of a non-profitable OEM contract.
22
Sales of structured cabling products increased 18%. Sales of DSL products decreased 22% and modular connecting products sales decreased 11% due to shifts in technology.
Suttles gross margin increased 30% in the third quarter of 2014 to $6,467,000 compared to $4,977,000 in the same period of 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased to 32% from 34% in the same period of 2013 due to increased investment into production capabilities to support new FTTx product platforms. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11% to $3,644,000, or 18.3% of sales, in the third quarter of 2014 compared to $3,289,000, or 22.2% of sales, in the same period in 2013 due to investment and recruitment of expertise in sales, operations, technology, product management, and engineering. Suttles operating income was $2,824,000 in the third quarter of 2014 compared to $1,688,000 in 2013.
Transition Networks Results
Transition Networks sales increased 4% to $11,272,000 in the third quarter of 2014 compared to $10,882,000 in 2013 due to increased activity in the North American and Rest of World markets. Transition Networks organizes its sales force by channel to market and segments its customers geographically. Third quarter sales by region are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks Sales by Region |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
North America |
|
$ |
8,354,000 |
|
$ |
7,753,000 |
|
Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) |
|
|
1,002,000 |
|
|
1,275,000 |
|
Rest of World |
|
|
1,916,000 |
|
|
1,854,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,272,000 |
|
$ |
10,882,000 |
|
The following table summarizes Transition Networks 2014 and 2013 third quarter sales by its major product groups:
Sales in North America increased 8% or $601,000 due to improving conditions at key customers. International sales decreased $211,000, or 7%, mainly due to lower circuit emulation and service contract sales out of the United Kingdom site. Sales of media converters decreased 6% or $515,000, due to a decline in domestic sales resulting from competitive pricing pressures and a slowdown of projects sold from the United Kingdom site.
23
Gross margin on third quarter Transition Networks sales decreased 3% to $4,989,000 in 2014 from $5,165,000 in 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased to 44% in 2014 from 47% in 2013 due to unfavorable product mix and pricing pressure. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 3% to $5,032,000, or 44.6% of sales, in 2014 compared to $5,165,000, or 47.5% of sales, in 2013 due to the closing of our China facility earlier in 2014. Operating loss was $43,000 in 2014 compared to a loss of $5,850,000 in 2013, due to a goodwill impairment loss of $5,850,000 in the third quarter of 2013.
JDL Technologies, Inc. Results
JDL Technologies, Inc. sales decreased 88% to $2,224,000 in the third quarter of 2014 compared to $18,897,000 in 2013.
JDLs revenues by customer group were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JDL Revenue by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Broward County FL schools |
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
$ |
3,393,000 |
|
Miami Dade County FL schools |
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
14,553,000 |
|
All other |
|
|
405,000 |
|
|
951,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,224,000 |
|
$ |
18,897,000 |
|
Revenues earned from Broward County Public Schools, Florida decreased $1,593,000 or 47% in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the 2013 third quarter due to the Federal governments decision to withhold all priority two E-Rate funding for the current fiscal year, which required the district to find alternate funding sources for planned projects. Revenues earned from Miami-Dade County Public Schools in the third quarter of 2013 are related to the districts Bringing Wireless to the Classroom initiative for which the district received federal funding under the E-Rate program to expand wireless connectivity for students and staff. This was completed in the first quarter of 2014. Revenue from JDL Technologies sales to small and medium-sized commercial businesses (SMBs) decreased by 57% to $405,000 as there were fewer large infrastructure transactions completed in the third quarter due to a combination of market trends and JDLs continued focus on higher margined managed service growth.
Gross margin decreased 84% to $556,000 in the third quarter of 2014 compared to $3,481,000 in the same period in 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased to 25% in 2014 from 18% in 2013 due to a change in the mix of revenue, as the sales into Miami-Dade County Public Schools had lower margins in 2013. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 33% in 2014 to $679,000, or 30.5% of sales, compared to $1,015,000, or 5.4% of sales, in 2013 due to a decrease in internal costs associated with the higher revenue achieved in the previous years E-Rate driven business. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were much higher in the 2014 period as JDLs non-variable general and administrative expenses constituted a much higher percentage of the lower 2014 sales. JDL Technologies reported an operating loss of $123,000 in the third quarter of 2014 compared to operating income of $2,467,000 in the same period of 2013.
Other
The Companys income before income taxes increased to $2,734,000 in 2014 compared to a loss of $1,756,000 in 2013. The Companys effective income tax rate was 38.0% in 2014 and (16.0%) in 2013. This effective tax rate for 2014 differs from the federal tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, provisions for interest charges for uncertain income tax positions, and settlement of uncertain tax positions.
24
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared
to
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Consolidated sales decreased 12% in 2014 to $91,841,000 compared to $104,006,000 in 2013. Consolidated operating income in 2014 increased to $4,811,000 compared to $1,242,000 in the first nine months of 2013. Net income in 2014 increased to $2,992,000 or $0.35 per share compared to a net loss of $155,000 or $ (0.02) per share in the first nine months of 2013.
Suttle Results
Suttle sales increased 26% in the first nine months of 2014 to $51,827,000 compared to $41,103,000 in the same period of 2013 due to revenue generated from new FTTx (fiber to the home or node) product platforms. Sales by customer groups in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Communication service providers |
|
$ |
44,168,000 |
|
$ |
32,447,000 |
|
Distributors |
|
|
4,591,000 |
|
|
4,574,000 |
|
International |
|
|
2,865,000 |
|
|
3,771,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
203,000 |
|
|
311,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
51,827,000 |
|
$ |
41,103,000 |
|
Suttles sales by product groups in first nine months of 2014 and 2013 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Product Group |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Modular connecting products |
|
$ |
9,976,000 |
|
$ |
10,911,000 |
|
Structured cabling products |
|
|
24,822,000 |
|
|
19,723,000 |
|
DSL products |
|
|
4,415,000 |
|
|
6,337,000 |
|
FTTx products |
|
|
12,385,000 |
|
|
2,632,000 |
|
Other products |
|
|
229,000 |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
51,827,000 |
|
$ |
41,103,000 |
|
Sales to the major communication service providers increased 36% in 2014 due to growth in core high-speed copper connectivity products and success in securing new business in multiple FTTx domains. Sales to major communication service providers accounted for 85% of Suttles sales in the first nine months of 2014 compared to 79% of sales in 2013. Sales to distributors remained flat in 2014. This customer segment accounted for 9% and 11% of sales in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. International sales decreased 24% and accounted for 6% of Suttles first nine months 2014 sales, due to a reduction in revenue from Austin Taylor legacy products, in part due to the Companys termination of a non-profitable OEM contract.
Sales of structured cabling products increased 26%. Sales of DSL products decreased 30% and modular connecting products sales decreased 9% due to shifts in technology.
25
Suttles gross margin increased 34% in the first nine months of 2014 to $16,233,000 compared to $12,155,000 in the same period of 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased to 31% from 30% in 2013 due to introduction of new FTTx products, focused value engineering and cost optimization efforts, and economies of scale. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 17% to $10,139,000, or 19.6% of sales, in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $8,644,000, or 21.0% of sales, in the same period in 2013 due to investment and recruitment of expertise in sales, operations, technology, product management, and engineering. Suttles operating income was $6,093,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $3,510,000 in 2013.
Transition Networks Results
Transition Networks sales increased slightly to $32,589,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $32,156,000 in 2013. Transition Networks organizes its sales force by channel to market and segments its customers geographically. First nine months sales by region are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks Sales by Region |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
North America |
|
$ |
23,467,000 |
|
$ |
21,784,000 |
|
Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) |
|
|
3,323,000 |
|
|
4,028,000 |
|
Rest of World |
|
|
5,799,000 |
|
|
6,344,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
32,589,000 |
|
$ |
32,156,000 |
|
The following table summarizes Transition Networks 2014 and 2013 first nine months sales by its major product groups:
Sales in North America increased 8% or $1,683,000 due to increased sales into the Federal government channel. International sales decreased $1,250,000, or 12%, due mainly to a weaker first quarter of this year compared to last year. Sales of media converters decreased 4% or $783,000 due to continued competitive pressures and delays in new product introduction.
Gross margin on first nine months Transition Networks sales decreased 9% to $15,081,000 in 2014 from $16,561,000 in 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased to 46% in 2014 from 52% in 2013 due to unfavorable product mix and competitive prices. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 6% to $15,821,000, or 48.5% of sales, in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $16,782,000, or 52.2% of sales, in 2013 due to restructuring of certain go-to-market functions in the last three quarters of 2013, higher ERP related expenses in the same period and the closure of the China facility in 2014. Operating loss decreased to $977,000 in 2014 compared to an operating loss of $6,071,000 in 2013, primarily due a goodwill impairment charge of $5,850,000 in the third quarter of 2013.
26
JDL Technologies, Inc. Results
JDL Technologies, Inc. sales decreased 76% to $7,426,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $30,747,000 in 2013.
Revenues by customer group were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JDL Revenue by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
||
Broward County FL schools |
|
$ |
5,755,000 |
|
$ |
7,294,000 |
|
Miami Dade County FL schools |
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
21,691,000 |
|
All other |
|
|
1,552,000 |
|
|
1,762,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,426,000 |
|
$ |
30,747,000 |
|
Revenues earned through sales to Broward County Public Schools, decreased $1,539,000 in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to the 2013 first nine months due to the Federal governments decision to withhold all priority two E-Rate funding for the current fiscal year, which required the district to find alternate funding sources for planned projects. Revenues earned through sales to Miami-Dade County Public Schools in the first nine months of both 2014 and 2013 are related to the districts Bringing Wireless to the Classroom initiative for which the district received federal funding under the E-Rate program to expand wireless connectivity for students and staff. This was completed in the first quarter of 2014. Revenue from JDL Technologies sales to small and medium sized commercial businesses (SMBs) decreased by 12% or $210,000 as there were fewer large infrastructure transactions completed in the third quarter due to a combination of market trends and JDLs continued focus on higher margin managed service growth.
Gross margin decreased 71% to $1,781,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $6,212,000 in the same period in 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased to 24% in 2014 from 20% in 2013 reflecting the fact that a significant portion of its 2013 revenue was hardware-based, rather than the more traditional value-added service. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2014 to $2,085,000, or 28.1% of sales, compared to $2,410,000, or 7.8% of sales, in 2013 due to a decrease in internal costs associated with the higher revenue achieved in the previous years E-Rate driven business. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were much higher in the 2014 period as JDLs non-variable general and administrative expenses constituted a much higher percentage of the lower 2014 sales. JDL Technologies reported an operating loss of $304,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to operating income of $3,803,000 in the same period of 2013.
Because federal and local funding for investments in IT infrastructure and services for K-12 schools varies substantially from year to year, JDL Technologies has experienced large swings in quarterly and annual revenues. We expect this volatility in revenues to continue in the balance of 2014 and future years. Based on recent indications from the federal government, we anticipate that the E-Rate program will be insufficiently funded to enable the Miami-Dade and Broward school districts to complete all the IT projects slated for 2014. If additional federal government funding does not materialize in 2014 and 2015, we may experience delay or cancellation of present or future wireless infrastructure projects in the districts. As previously reported, our 2013 results included approximately $23.0 million in revenue from a wireless connectivity project for the Miami- Dade County Public School district.
To reduce dependence on government funding, JDL Technologies continues to aggressively pursue opportunities to provide managed services, migration to the cloud, virtualization HIPAA-compliant IT services, and other network services to SMBs with a focus on healthcare, legal and financial services and logistics markets. As part of this initiative, JDL Technologies has adopted HIPAA standards that enable it to serve healthcare providers as a compliant Business Associate.
27
Other
The Companys income before income taxes increased to $4,744,000 in 2014 compared to $1,204,000 in 2013. The Companys effective income tax rate was 36.9% in 2014 and 112.9% in 2013. This effective tax rate for 2014 differs from the federal tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, provisions for interest charges for uncertain income tax positions, and settlement of uncertain tax positions. The effect of the foreign operations is an overall rate increase of approximately 2.7% in the first nine months of 2014. The Companys effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 differed from the federal tax rate due to state income taxes, return to provision adjustments, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, provisions for interest charges for uncertain income tax positions, the effect of operations conducted in lower foreign tax rate jurisdictions, the release of contingent consideration from the Companys 2011 acquisition and goodwill impairment not deductible for income tax purposes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2014, the Company had approximately $32,028,000 in cash, cash equivalents and investments. Of this amount, $6,003,000 was invested in short-term money market funds that are not considered to be bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or other government agency. These money market funds seek to preserve the value of the investment at $1.00 per share; however, it is possible to lose money investing in these funds. The remainder in cash and cash equivalents is operating cash and certificates of deposit that are fully insured through the FDIC. The Company also had $15,697,000 in investments consisting of certificates of deposit and corporate notes and bonds that are traded on the open market and are classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2014.
The Company had working capital of $60,731,000, consisting of current assets of approximately $73,730,000 and current liabilities of $12,999,000 at September 30, 2014 compared to working capital of $70,599,000, consisting of current assets of $83,672,000 and current liabilities of $13,073,000 at December 31, 2013. The Companys working capital at September 30, 2014 decreased from year-end as the Company increased its ownership of long-term investments to $11,072,000 from $3,921,000.
Cash flow provided by operating activities was approximately $11,170,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $11,832,000 used in the same period of 2013. Significant working capital changes from December 31, 2013 to September 30, 2014 included a decrease in receivables of $6,280,000 due to the receipt of outstanding receivables at JDL Technologies related to the Miami Dade project primarily completed in 2013, partially offset by an increase in sales at Suttle during the quarter and an increase in Suttle-related inventory and related accounts payable.
Net cash used in investing activities was $10,019,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $5,048,000 provided in the same period of 2013. The Company continued to make capital investments and purchases of certificates of deposit and other marketable securities, moving more of its capital into longer term investments.
28
Net cash used by financing activities was $4,845,000 in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $2,971,000 in the same period of 2013. The Company made $566,000 in contingent consideration payments related to the Patapsco acquisition in 2011. There are no future contingent consideration payments related to this acquisition. Cash dividends paid on common stock increased to $4,187,000 in 2014 ($0.48 per common share) from $2,730,000 in 2013 due to an accelerated payment of the dividend declared and paid in December 2012. Proceeds from common stock issuances, principally shares sold to the Companys Employee Stock Ownership Plan and issued under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan, totaled approximately $221,000 in 2014 and $247,000 in 2013. The Company did not repurchase any shares in 2014 or 2013 under the Board authorized program. At September 30, 2014, Board of Director authority to purchase approximately 411,910 additional shares remained in effect. The Company acquired $17,000 and $0 in 2014 and 2013, respectively, of Company stock from employees in order to satisfy withholding tax obligations related to share-based compensation, pursuant to terms of Board and shareholder-approved compensation plans.
The Company has a $10,000,000 line of credit from Wells Fargo Bank. Interest on borrowings on the credit line is at LIBOR plus 1.1% (1.3% at September 30, 2014). There were no borrowings on the line of credit during the first nine months of 2014 or 2013. The credit agreement expires October 31, 2016 and is secured by assets of the Company.
In the opinion of management, based on the Companys current financial and operating position and projected future expenditures, sufficient funds are available to meet the Companys anticipated operating and capital expenditure needs.
Enterprise Resource Planning
On April 4, 2013, our Transition Networks business unit and the parent Communications Systems, Inc. went live on a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Due to the restructuring of the Company into a holding company structure with greater focus on our three operating business units, we are moving more deliberately to implement the new ERP system in the rest of the Company. We expect Suttle to adopt the new ERP system in 2015.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, are discussed in our 2013 Form 10-K in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. There were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
The Companys accounting policies have been consistently applied in all material respects and disclose such matters as allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns, inventory valuation, warranty expense, income taxes, revenue recognition, asset impairment recognition and foreign currency translation. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions. Management reviews these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis.
29
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
We do not believe there are any recently issued accounting standards that have not yet been adopted that will have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
|
|
I tem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . |
The Company has no freestanding or embedded derivatives. The Companys policy is to not use freestanding derivatives and to not enter into contracts with terms that cannot be designated as normal purchases or sales.
The vast majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars; as such, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have historically not been material to the Company. At September 30, 2014 our bank line of credit carried a variable interest rate based on LIBOR plus 1.1%.
Based on the Companys operations, in the opinion of management, no material future losses or exposure exist relative to market risk.
|
|
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
30
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Not Applicable.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not Applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
(a) Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares (or
|
|
|
(b) Maximum Number (or Approximate
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
July 2014 |
|
|
629 |
|
|
$ |
12.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,910 |
|
August 2014 |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
10.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,910 |
|
September 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,910 |
|
Total |
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
$ |
10.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The shares in this column represent shares that were surrendered to us by plan participants to satisfy withholding tax obligations related to share-based compensation. |
|
(b) |
Shares represent remaining amount of a 500,000 share repurchase authorization approved by the Companys Board in October 2008 and publicly announced in November 2008. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon
Senior Securities
Not Applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety
Disclosures
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not Applicable.
31
Item 6. Exhibits .
The following exhibits are included herein:
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Note dated as of October 31, 2014 between Communications Systems, Inc., JDL Technologies, Inc., Transition Networks, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. |
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act). |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act). |
|
|
|
|
32. |
Certifications pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350). |
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
Press Release dated November 5, 2014 announcing 2014 Third Quarter Results. |
32
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Roger H.D. Lacey |
|
|
|
Roger H.D. Lacey |
|
Date: November 6, 2014 |
|
Interim Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edwin C. Freeman |
|
|
|
Edwin C. Freeman |
|
Date: November 6, 2014 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
33
Exhibit 10.1
THIRD
AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING NOTE
This Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Note (this Amendment ), dated as of October 31, 2014, is entered into by and between COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( Communications Systems ), JDL TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation ( JDL ), TRANSITION NETWORKS, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( Transition Networks , together with Communications Systems and JDL, Borrowers and each a Borrower ), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ( Lender ).
RECITALS
Borrowers and Lender are parties to a Credit Agreement dated as of October 28, 2011, as amended by a First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver of Event of Default dated as of November 28, 2012 and a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver of Event of Default dated as of November 14, 2013 (as so amended, and as the same may be further amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the Credit Agreement ). Capitalized terms used in these recitals have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement unless otherwise specified.
Borrowers obligations to Lender are evidenced by, among other things, that certain Amended and Restated Revolving Note dated November 28, 2012, issued by Borrowers in favor of Lender in the original principal amount of $10,000,000 (as amended, restated, supplemented, extended, renewed, replaced or otherwise modified from time to time, the Revolving Note )
Borrowers have requested that Lender agree to certain amendments to the Credit Agreement and the Revolving Note, and the Lender has agreed to make such amendments on the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, it is agreed as follows:
1. Definitions . Capitalized terms used in this Amendment (including in the Recitals) have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement unless otherwise expressly defined in this Amendment.
2. Amendment to Revolving Note . The dated November 1, 2014 contained in the first paragraph of the Revolving Note is hereby replaced in its entirety to read November 1, 2016.
3. Amendments to Credit Agreement .
|
|
|
(a) The date November 1, 2014 contained in the first sentence of Section 1.1(a) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: November 1, 2016. |
|
|
|
(b) The phrase Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) contained in the first sentence of Section 1.1(b) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). |
|
|
|
(c) Section 4.9 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 4.9 Financial Condition . Using GAAP (except to the extent modified by the definitions herein): |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(a) Maintain Borrowers financial condition as follows, with compliance determined as of each fiscal quarter end, determined on a rolling four-quarter basis, commencing with financial statements for the quarter ending December 31, 2011: |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
(i) a minimum Current Ratio not less than 1.75 to 1.0; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) a minimum Net Profit of $3,000,000; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) a minimum Tangible Net Worth of not less than $60,000,000. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(b) Commencing June 30, 2015 and as of June 30 of each year thereafter, Borrowers will achieve Net Profit of not less than $500,000, with compliance determined as of each such June 30 on a fiscal year-to-date basis. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary contained in the definitions below, for purposes of determining Borrowers compliance with subsections (a)(ii) and (b) of this Section 4.9, up to $5,850,000 of goodwill impairment charges recognized by Borrowers on or about September 30, 2013 in connection with Borrowers Transition Networks business unit shall be excluded. As used in this Section 4.9: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v) Current Ratio means, with respect to the applicable computation period, the ratio of (i) current assets owned by such entity to (ii) current liabilities of such entity, plus the sum of all outstanding working capital borrowings under the Line of Credit and Letters of Credit issued under this Agreement; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(x) Net Profit means net profit of an entity before tax; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(y) Tangible Net Worth means the sum of (i) an entitys total net worth less (ii) any intangible assets owned by such entity, plus the sum of all Subordinated Debt; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(z) Subordinated Debt means debt of a person or entity that is subordinated to the payment of all debts, liabilities and obligations of Borrowers arising under or in connection with this Agreement and any other Loan Documents and all rights and remedies granted to Bank under or in connection with this Agreement and any other Loan Documents pursuant to a subordination agreement in form and substance acceptable to Bank in its sole discretion, executed and delivered by each holder of such subordinated debt in favor of Bank. |
|
|
|
|
||
4. No Other Changes . Except as explicitly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, the Revolving Note and the other Loan Documents remain in full force and effect. |
-2-
|
|
5. Conditions Precedent . This Amendment shall be effective when Lender shall have received an executed original of this Amendment, together with each of the following, each in form and substance acceptable to Lender: |
|
|
|
|
(a) a certificate of the secretary of each Borrower: (a) attaching resolutions of the Board of Directors of such Borrower authorizing the execution, delivery and performance by such Borrower of the Loan Documents, including this Amendment and the Amended Note, (b) certifying that the articles of incorporation of such Borrower delivered by such Borrower to Lender on October 28, 2011 have not been amended or changed in any respect (or if there has been any amendment or change, certifying that attached to such certificate is a current copy of such articles of incorporation (certified by the Secretary of State of formation)), (c) certifying that the bylaws of such Borrower delivered by such Borrower to Lender on October 28, 2011 have not been amended or changed in any respect (or if there has been any amendment or change, certifying that attached to such certificate is a current copy of such bylaws of such Borrower), and (d) containing the names of the officer or officers of such Borrower authorized to sign the Loan Documents, including this Amendment and the Amended Note, together with a sample of the true signature of each such officer, or affirming that the officer or officers certified to Lender on October 28, 2011 remain so authorized; together with current good standing certificate for such Borrower; and |
|
|
|
(b) such other matters as Lender may reasonably require. |
|
|
6. Representations and Warranties . Borrowers hereby represent and warrant to Lender as follows: |
|
|
|
|
(a) Each Borrower has all requisite power and authority to execute this Amendment, the Amended Note and any other agreements or instruments required hereunder and to perform all of its obligations hereunder, and the Credit Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, and the other Loan Documents to which such Borrower is a party have been duly executed and delivered by such Borrower and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of such Borrower, enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except as enforcement may be limited by equitable principles or by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws relating to or limiting creditors rights generally. |
|
|
|
(b) The execution, delivery and performance by such Borrower of Credit Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, and the other Loan Documents to which such Borrower is a party have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action and do not (i) violate any material provision of federal, state, or local law or regulation applicable to such Borrower, the governing documents of such Borrower, or any order, judgment, or decree of any court or other governmental authority binding on such Borrower, (ii) conflict with, result in a breach of, or constitute (with due notice or lapse of time or both) a default under any contract, obligation, indenture or other instrument to which any Borrower is a party or by which any Borrower may be bound, (iii) result in or require the creation or imposition of any Lien of any nature whatsoever upon any assets of any Borrower, or (iv) require any approval of such Borrowers shareholders or any approval or consent of any other person or entity. |
|
|
|
(c) All of the representations and warranties contained in Article II of the Credit Agreement are correct on and as of the date hereof as though made on and as of the date hereof, except to the extent that such representations and warranties relate solely to an earlier date. |
-3-
7. References . All references in the Credit Agreement to this Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Credit Agreement as amended by this Amendment; and any and all references in the other Loan Documents to the Credit Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Credit Agreement as amended by this Amendment. All references in the Credit Agreement and each other Loan Document to the Revolving Note shall be deemed to refer to the Amended Note.
8. No Other Waiver . Except as expressly set forth therein, the execution of this Amendment and the acceptance of all other agreements and instruments related hereto shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any default or Event of Default under the Credit Agreement or a waiver of any breach, default or event of default under any other Loan Document, whether or not known to Lender and whether or not existing on the date of this Amendment.
9. Release . Each Borrower hereby absolutely and unconditionally releases and forever discharges Lender, and any and all participants, parent corporations, subsidiary corporations, affiliated corporations, insurers, indemnitors, successors and assigns thereof, together with all of the present and former directors, officers, agents and employees of any of the foregoing, from any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any kind, nature or description arising under, in connection with or related to any of the debts, liabilities or obligations of Borrowers and/or any Borrower under any of the Loan Documents or any of the Loan Documents, whether arising in law or equity or upon contract or tort or under any state or federal law or otherwise, which Borrowers and/or any Borrower has had, now has or has made claim to have against any such person or entity for or by reason of any act, omission, matter, cause or thing whatsoever arising from the beginning of time to and including the date of this Amendment, whether such claims, demands and causes of action are matured or unmatured or known or unknown.
10. Costs and Expenses . Borrowers hereby reaffirm their agreement under Section 7.3 of the Credit Agreement to pay or reimburse Lender with respect to its costs, expenses and fees, including, without limitation, all reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel incurred by the Lender in connection with this Amendment.
11. Miscellaneous . This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which counterparts, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Amendment by facsimile transmission or in a pdf or similar electronic file shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart thereof.
Signature page follows
-4-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BORROWERS : |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JDL TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSITION NETWORKS, INC. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
Signature Page to Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Note
|
|
|
|
LENDER : |
|
|
|
|
|
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
Name: Michael M. Lebens |
|
|
Title: Vice President |
Signature Page to Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Note
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Roger H.D. Lacey certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Communications Systems, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Roger H.D. Lacey |
|
|
|
Roger H.D. Lacey |
|
Date: November 6, 2014 |
|
Interim Chief Executive Officer |
|
34
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Edwin C. Freeman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Communications Systems, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Edwin C. Freeman |
|
|
|
Edwin C. Freeman |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: November 6, 2014 |
|
|
|
35
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Roger H.D. Lacey |
|
|
|
Roger H.D. Lacey |
|
Date: November 6, 2014 |
|
Interim Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Edwin C. Freeman |
|
|
|
Edwin C. Freeman |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: November 6, 2014 |
|
|
|
36
Exhibit 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2014 FINANCIAL RESULTS
Minnetonka, MN November 5, 2014 Communications Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: JCS) (CSI or the Company), a global provider of physical connectivity infrastructure and services for deployments of broadband networks, today announced financial results for the third quarter (Q3 2014) and nine months ended September 30, 2014, including a discussion of results of operations by segment.
CSIs Interim Chief Executive Officer Roger H.D. Lacey commented, Our third quarter results reflected strong growth in revenues and operating income at Suttle, which continues to benefit from broad customer acceptance of our FTTx (fiber to the home or node) products. We continue to invest in technology and human resources in all three of our business units as we pursue the objectives previously announced in our recovery plan, and expect to see further improvement as we move into 2015.
Third Quarter 2014 Summary
|
|
|
|
Consolidated sales of $33.4 million compared to $44.6 million in Q3 2013. |
|
|
§ |
Suttle sales grew 34% |
|
§ |
Transition Networks sales rose 4% |
|
§ |
JDL Technologies sales declined 88% |
|
Gross profit of $12.0 million, or 36% of revenues, compared to gross profit of $13.6 million, or 31% of revenues, in Q3 2013. |
|
|
Operating income improved to $2.7 million from an operating loss of $1.7 million in Q3 2013. |
|
|
§ |
Suttle operating income grew 67% to $2.8 million |
|
§ |
Transition Networks operating loss was $43,000 |
|
§ |
JDL Technologies operating loss was $123,000 |
|
Net income was $1.7 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $2.0 million, or $(0.24) per diluted share, in Q3 2013. |
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments increased to $32.0 million at September 30, 2014 from $29.7 million at December 31, 2013. |
Mr. Lacey continued, Suttle revenues increased to $19.9 million from $14.8 million in Q3 2013, while operating profit rose to $2.8 million from $1.7 million in last years third quarter. This improvement was due to growth in core high-speed copper connectivity products and success in securing new business in multiple FTTx domains. Suttles combined FTTx product sales nearly quadrupled compared to the same period last year.
Revenues at Transition Networks rose to $11.3 million from $10.9 million, and the quarterly operating loss was consistent with the approximate break-even performance of Q3 2013, excluding the goodwill impairment charges of $5.8 million. We are repositioning Transition Networks for accelerated growth via a number of initiatives, including introducing innovative new products, such as the recently-launched Scorpion-USB Ethernet Adapter, as well as forthcoming offerings directed to global service providers. We remain confident in our strategy and expect continued progress at Transition Networks.
Quarter-over-quarter declines in revenues and profits at JDL Technologies had a significant impact on our consolidated results. This was not unexpected, as JDL Technologies concluded a large infrastructure project in Q1 2014 involving equipment sales at a low margin. We are refining JDL Technologies business model to reduce its dependence on E-Rate government funding, including pursuing opportunities to provide managed services and HIPAA-compliant IT services to the Florida healthcare market, where we are a leading provider. Despite the temporary lull created by E-Rate program funding constraints, we remain optimistic about JDLs longer-term prospects and are positioning the segment for a rebound in revenue growth and an eventual resumption of IT funding to our customers in the education sector.
Segment Financial Overview
See the Form 10Q to be filed on November 6, 2014 for more details of the quarter.
CSI operates through the following business units:
|
|
|
Suttle manufactures and markets copper and fiber connectivity systems, enclosure systems, xDSL filters and splitters, and active technologies for voice, data and video communications under the Suttle brand in the United States and internationally; |
|
|
|
Transition Networks manufactures network interface devices (NIDs), media converters, network interface cards (NICs), Ethernet switches, and other connectivity products that offer customers the ability to affordably integrate fiber optics into any data network; and |
|
|
|
JDL Technologies provides technology solutions including virtualization, managed services, wired and wireless network design and implementation, HIPAA-compliant IT solutions, and converged infrastructure configuration and deployment. |
Suttle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Sales |
|
|
$ |
19,938,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,838,000 |
|
|
$ |
51,827,000 |
|
|
$ |
41,103,000 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
6,467,000 |
|
|
|
4,977,000 |
|
|
|
16,233,000 |
|
|
|
12,155,000 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
2,824,000 |
|
|
|
1,688,000 |
|
|
|
6,093,000 |
|
|
|
3,510,000 |
|
Q3 2014 sales rose 34% from Q3 2013, due to revenue generated from new FTTx product platforms. FTTx product sales, as a group, increased 381% to $5.8 million from $1.2 million in Q3 2013. Sales to the major communication service providers rose 40% to $17.4 million from $12.4 million in Q3 2013, and comprised 88% of total segment revenues, up from 84% in Q3 2013. This increase was due to growth in core high-speed copper connectivity products and success in securing new business in multiple FTTx domains. Sales to distributors increased 11% to $1.6 million from $1.4 million in Q3 2013, primarily reflecting growth in high speed copper connectivity products.
Gross margin in Q3 2014 rose 30% to $6.5 million, or 32% of sales, from $5.0 million, or 34% of sales, in Q3 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales declined due to increased investment in our production capabilities to support new FTTx product platforms.
Operating income rose 67% to $2.8 million from $1.7 million in Q3 2013.
Transition Networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Sales |
|
|
$ |
11,272,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,882,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,589,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,156,000 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
4,989,000 |
|
|
|
5,165,000 |
|
|
|
15,081,000 |
|
|
|
16,561,000 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
|
(43,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,850,000 |
) |
|
|
(977,000 |
) |
|
|
(6,071,000 |
) |
Q3 2014 sales rose 4% to $11.3 million from $10.9 million in Q3 2013. Sales in North America increased 8% to $8.4 million due to improving conditions at key customers, and Rest of World sales rose 3% to $1.9 million. These improvements more than offset a 21% sales decline in Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA).
Gross margin decreased 3% to $5.0 million, or 44% of sales, from $5.2 million, or 47% of sales, in Q3 2013, due to unfavorable product mix and pricing pressure.
Operating loss narrowed to $43,000 from $5.9 million in Q3 2013. The operating loss in Q3 2013 included a goodwill impairment charge of $5.8 million
JDL Technologies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Sales |
|
|
$ |
2,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,897,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,426,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,747,000 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
556,000 |
|
|
|
3,481,000 |
|
|
|
1,781,000 |
|
|
|
6,212,000 |
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
|
(123,000 |
) |
|
|
2,467,000 |
|
|
|
(304,000 |
) |
|
|
3,803,000 |
|
Results at JDL Technologies continue to be affected by the federal governments decision to withhold all priority two E-Rate funding this year, as the E-Rate program undergoes an extensive modernization project that will affect most key elements in the program. The E-Rate program was developed to assist schools and libraries in the United States in obtaining affordable telecommunications and Internet access.
Sales declined 88% to $2.2 million in Q3 2014 from $18.9 million in Q3 2013, driven by a $14.5 million decrease in revenues from Miami-Dade County Public Schools due to the completion of Bringing Wireless to the Classroom projects in Q1 2014. Sales to small-and medium-sized commercial businesses (SMBs) decreased by 57% to $0.4 million in Q3 2014 from $1.0 million in Q3 2013 as there were fewer large infrastructure transactions completed in Q3 2014 due to a combination of market trends and JDLs continued focus on higher-margin managed service growth.
Q3 2014 gross margin declined 84% to $0.6 million, or 25% of sales, from $3.5 million, or 18% of sales, in Q3 2013. Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased due to a change in revenue mix, as sales into Miami-Dade County Public Schools had lower margins in Q3 2013.
Operating loss was $123,000 compared to operating income of $2.5 million in Q3 2013.
Financial Condition
CSIs balance sheet at September 30, 2014 included cash, cash equivalents, and investments of $32.0 million, working capital of $60.7 million, and stockholders equity of $88.1 million.
On October 1, 2014, CSI paid a cash dividend of $0.16 per common share to shareholders of record as of September 15, 2014. This marked the 48 th consecutive quarter that CSI has paid a dividend to its shareholders.
About Communications Systems
Communications Systems, Inc. provides physical connectivity infrastructure and services for global deployments of broadband networks. Focusing on innovative, cost-effective solutions, CSI provides customers the ability to deliver, manage, and optimize their broadband network services and architecture. From the integration of fiber optics in any application and environment to efficient home voice and data deployments to optimization of data and application access, CSI provides the tools for maximum utilization of the network from the edge to the user. With partners and customers in over 50 countries, CSI has built a reputation as a reliable global innovator focusing on quality and customer service.
Forward- Looking Statements
This press release includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding future financial performance, future growth and future acquisitions. These statements are based on Communications Systems current expectations or beliefs and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the statements herein due to changes in economic, business, competitive or regulatory factors, and other risks and uncertainties affecting the operation of Communications Systems business. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies are indicated from time to time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information set forth herein should be read in light of such risks. Further, investors should keep in mind that the Companys financial results in any particular period may not be indicative of future results. Communications Systems is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise.
|
|
|
Contacts: |
|
|
|
|
|
Communications Systems, Inc. |
|
The Equity Group Inc. |
Ed Freeman |
|
Devin Sullivan |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Senior Vice President |
952-996-1674 |
|
212-836-9608 |
efreeman@commsysinc.com |
|
dsullivan@equityny.com |
|
|
|
Roger H. D. Lacey |
|
Kalle Ahl, CFA |
Interim Chief Executive Officer |
|
Senior Associate |
952-996-1674 |
|
212-836-9614 |
|
|
kahl@equityny.com |
CSI CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF EARNINGS
Selected Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
Sept. 30, 2014 |
|
Sept. 30, 2013 |
|
Sept. 30, 2014 |
|
Sept. 30, 2013 |
|
||||
Sales |
|
$ |
33,433,924 |
|
$ |
44,616,873 |
|
$ |
91,841,307 |
|
$ |
104,006,206 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
12,012,500 |
|
|
13,623,187 |
|
|
33,094,285 |
|
|
34,927,430 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,657,901 |
|
|
(1,695,638 |
) |
|
4,811,490 |
|
|
1,241,989 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2,733,608 |
|
|
(1,755,742 |
) |
|
4,744,045 |
|
|
1,203,507 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,038,707 |
|
|
280,191 |
|
|
1,752,243 |
|
|
1,358,525 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,694,901 |
|
$ |
(2,035,933 |
) |
$ |
2,991,802 |
|
$ |
(155,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. basic shares outstanding |
|
|
8,641,853 |
|
|
8,547,563 |
|
|
8,609,835 |
|
|
8,524,045 |
|
Avg. dilutive shares outstanding |
|
|
8,663,142 |
|
|
8,550,227 |
|
|
8,631,985 |
|
|
8,531,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2014 |
|
Dec. 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
102,576,590 |
|
$ |
103,532,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
|
32,027,510 |
|
|
29,722,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
|
60,731,538 |
|
|
70,599,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
17,178,956 |
|
|
14,941,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,439,847 |
|
|
1,837,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
88,138,174 |
|
|
88,622,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|