Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
Neuberger Berman Income Opportunity Fund Inc.
605 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10158-0180
877-461-1899
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
[ ], 2010
This Statement of Additional Information, which is not a prospectus, supplements and should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated [ ], 2010, relating specifically to the proposed reorganization of Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (“NHS”) and Neuberger Berman Income Opportunity Fund Inc. (“NOX”) whereby NHS and NOX would be reorganized into a newly formed Maryland corporation named Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc. (“New NHS,” and together with NHS and NOX, the “Funds,” and each, a “Fund”), pursuant to which, first NHS and then NOX would transfer all of its respective assets to New NHS in exchange solely for New NHS’s shares and cash in lieu of certain fractional shares of NOX and the assumption by the New NHS of all of its respective liabilities (the “Reorganization”). To obtain a copy of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, please write to the Fund of which you are a stockholder at the address set forth above or call 877-461-1899. The Reorganization is to occur pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization. If the Agreement is approved and the Reorganization occurs, holders of common shares of beneficial interest, no par value per share, of NHS (the “NHS Common Shares”) and holders of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of NOX (the “NOX Common Stock”) each would receive newly issued shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of New NHS (the “New NHS Common Stock,” and together with NHS Common Shares and NOX Common Stock, the “Common Stock”), the aggregate net asset value of which would equal the aggregate net asset value of NHS Common Shares and NOX Common Stock they held immediately prior to the Reorganization. For ease of reading, “stock” and “stockholders” have been used in certain places to describe, respectively, the shares of NHS and the shareholders of NHS. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the same meanings as are given to them in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
The Reorganizations are to occur pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the form of which is attached to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Appendix A) (the “Agreement”). If the Agreement is approved and both Reorganizations occur, holders of common shares of beneficial interest, no par value per share, in NHS (the “NHS Common Shares”) and holders of shares common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of NOX (the “NOX Common Stock”) each would receive newly issued shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of New NHS (the “New NHS Common Stock,” and together with NHS Common Shares and NOX Common Stock, the “Common Stock”), the aggregate net asset value of which would equal the aggregate net asset value of the NHS Common Shares and NOX Common Stock they held immediately prior to the Reorganizations. (For ease of reading, the word “stock” is used in certain places to include the shares of NHS.) Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the same meanings as are given to them in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
The audited financial statements and related independent registered public accounting firm’s reports for NHS and NOX contained in their respective annual report to stockholders for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and October 31, 2009, respectively, are incorporated herein by this reference. No other parts of either annual report are incorporated by reference herein.
No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations not contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus or in this SAI in connection with the offering made by the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by a Fund or its distributor. The Proxy Statement/Prospectus and this SAI do not constitute an offering by a Fund or its distributor in any jurisdiction in which such offering may not lawfully be made.
The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. “Neuberger Berman Management LLC” and the fund names in this SAI are either service marks or registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Management LLC.
©2010 Neuberger Berman Management LLC. All rights reserved.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS
|
1
|
|
|
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES, TECHNIQUES AND RISKS
|
4
|
|
|
FUTURES CONTRACTS, OPTIONS ON FUTURES CONTRACTS, OPTIONS ON SECURITIES AND INDICES, FORWARD CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS ON FOREIGN CURRENCIES (COLLECTIVELY, "FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS")
|
19
|
|
|
PORTFOLIO TRADING AND TURNOVER RATE
|
29
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS
|
29
|
|
|
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
|
30
|
|
|
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
|
36
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE
|
41
|
|
|
REPURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK; TENDER OFFERS; CONVERSION TO OPEN-END FUND
|
42
|
|
|
TAX MATTERS
|
43
|
|
|
REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
|
48
|
|
|
CUSTODIAN AND TRANSFER AGENT
|
48
|
|
|
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
48
|
|
|
COUNSEL
|
49
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
|
49
|
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
49
|
|
|
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
49
|
|
|
APPENDIX A – RATINGS OF CORPORATE BONDS AND COMMERCIAL PAPER
|
A-1
|
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS
The investment objectives and general investment policies of the Funds are described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The Funds have the same investment objective and substantially similar investment policies, invest in substantially similar markets and present substantially similar risks. There are no significant differences among the investment strategies of the Funds. Additional information concerning certain characteristics of the Funds is set forth below. In this section, the term “Manager” refers to Neuberger Berman Management LLC (“NB Management”), Neuberger Berman Fixed Income LLC (“NBFI”), or Neuberger Berman LLC (“Neuberger”), as appropriate.
With respect to investments in high-yield corporate debt securities, each Fund expects, in current market conditions, to focus its investments on high-yield corporate debt securities in the middle to high end of the non-investment grade spectrum.
For New NHS and NOX, unless otherwise indicated, any investment policy or limitation that involves a maximum percentage of securities or assets will not be considered exceeded unless the percentage limitation is exceeded immediately after, and because of, a transaction by the Fund. If, because of changes in the value of a Fund's portfolio, the asset coverage for any borrowings were to fall below 300%, this would limit the Fund's ability to pay dividends, and, therefore, the Fund intends to restore the 300% asset coverage as soon as practical in light of the circumstances.
The fundamental investment policies and limitations of New NHS and NOX are as follows:
1.
Borrowing
. Each Fund may not borrow money in excess of 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount of money borrowed) minus liabilities (other than the amount borrowed), except that it may borrow up to an additional 5% of its total assets for temporary purposes.
2.
Commodities
. Each Fund may not purchase physical commodities or contracts thereon, unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, but this restriction shall not prohibit the Fund from purchasing futures contracts or options (including options on futures contracts, but excluding options or futures contracts on physical commodities) or from investing in securities of any kind.
For purposes of the limitation on commodities, each Fund does not consider foreign currencies or forward contracts to be physical commodities.
3.
Diversification
. Each Fund is non-diversified under the 1940 Act.
4.
Industry Concentration
. Each Fund may not purchase any security if, as a result, 25% or more of its total assets (taken at current value) would be invested in the securities of issuers having their principal business activities in the same industry, except that each Fund will invest greater than 25% of its total assets in the real estate industry. This limitation does not apply to U.S. Government and Agency Securities.
5.
Lending
. Each Fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets (taken at current value) would be lent to other parties, except, in accordance with its investment objectives, policies and limitations, (i) through the purchase of debt securities or (ii) by engaging in repurchase agreements.
6.
Real Estate
. Each Fund may not purchase real estate unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, except that each Fund may (i) invest in securities of issuers that mortgage, invest or deal in real estate or interests therein, (ii) invest in securities that are secured by real estate or interests therein, (iii) purchase and sell mortgage-related securities, (iv) hold and sell real estate it acquired as a result of the ownership of securities and (v) invest in REITs of any kind.
7.
Senior Securities
. Each Fund may not issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act.
8.
Underwriting
. Each Fund may not underwrite securities of other issuers, except to the extent that a Fund, in disposing of portfolio securities, may be deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("1933 Act").
NHS has adopted the fundamental investment restrictions set forth below which may not be changed without the approval (a "Majority Stockholder Vote") of a majority of the Fund's outstanding common stock and Preferred Shares, voting together as a class, and the approval of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Shares, voting separately by class. The Fund may not:
1.
Diversification
. With respect to 75% of the value of its total assets, invest more than 5% of its total assets in the securities of any one issuer, or invest in more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer. These limitations do not apply to investments in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities.
2.
Industry Concentration
. Purchase any security if, as a result of such purchase, 25% or more of the value of the Fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of issuers having their principal business activities in any single industry; provided, that this limitation shall not apply with respect to obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities.
3.
Senior Securities.
Issue senior securities or borrow money, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act or as otherwise permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).
4.
Lending
. Make loans of money or property to any person, except through the purchase of debt securities, including corporate loans and other financial instruments, in accordance with the Fund's investment policies, loans of portfolio securities or the acquisition of securities subject to repurchase agreements.
5.
Underwriting.
Act as an underwriter of securities, except to the extent the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriter when disposing of its portfolio investments.
6.
Real Estate
. Purchase, hold or deal in real estate, except that the Fund may invest in securities that are secured by real estate, or issued by companies that invest or deal in real estate or real estate investment trusts.
7.
Commodities
. Invest in commodities or commodity contracts, except that the Fund may purchase or sell financial futures (and related options), foreign currencies (including currency options), and derivatives.
In addition to the foregoing fundamental investment restrictions, NHS’s investment objective is a fundamental policy which cannot be changed by the Fund's board of directors ("Board of Directors" or "Board") without a Majority Stockholder Vote.
The following investment policies and limitations are non-fundamental for each of New NHS and NOX:
1.
Lending
. Except for the purchase of debt securities, loans, loan participations or other forms of direct debt instruments and engaging in repurchase agreements, each Fund may not make any loans other than securities loans.
2.
Margin Transactions
. Each Fund may not purchase securities on margin from brokers or other lenders, except that each Fund may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of securities transactions. Margin payments in connection with transactions in futures contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute the purchase of securities on margin and shall not be deemed to violate the foregoing limitation.
3.
Foreign Securities
. Each Fund may not invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in securities of non-U.S. issuers located in countries considered by NB Management to be industrialized, which securities may be U.S. dollar-denominated or denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. This policy does not limit investment in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and similar instruments denominated in U.S. dollars, where the underlying security may be denominated in a foreign currency.
4.
Investments in any one Issuer
. At the close of each quarter of each Fund's taxable year, (i) no more than 25% of the value of its total assets may be invested in the securities of a single issuer and (ii) with regard to 50% of the value of its total assets, no more than 5% of the value of its total assets may be invested in the securities of a single issuer and it may not hold more than 10% of an issuer's outstanding voting securities. These limitations do not apply to U.S. Government securities, as defined for tax purposes, or securities of another regulated investment company ("RIC"), as defined in Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code").
Under the 1940 Act, a "senior security" does not include any promissory note or evidence of indebtedness regarding a loan for temporary purposes only and in an amount not exceeding 5% of the value of the total assets of the issuer at the time the loan is made. A loan is presumed to be for temporary purposes if it is repaid within sixty days and is not extended or renewed. Any preferred stock issued by New NHS (“New NHS Preferred Stock,” and together with New NHS Common Stock, “New NHS Stock”), NHS Perpetual Preferred Shares (“NHS Preferred Stock”) and NOX Perpetual Preferred Shares (“NOX Preferred Stock”) (New NHS Preferred Stock, NHS Preferred Stock and NOX Preferred Stock, collectively, “Preferred Stock”; Common Stock and Preferred Stock, collectively, the “Stock”) would be considered senior securities under the 1940 Act. Each Fund may only issue Preferred Stock if the asset coverage (as defined in the 1940 Act) with respect to Preferred Stock would be at least 200% after such issuance.
To the extent each Fund covers its commitment under a derivative instrument by the segregation of assets determined by NB Management to be liquid and/or by holding instruments representing offsetting commitments, such instrument will not be considered a "senior security" for purposes of the asset coverage requirements otherwise applicable to borrowings by the Fund or its issuance of Preferred Stock.
Each Fund interprets its policies with respect to borrowing and lending to permit such activities as may be lawful for it, to the fullest extent permitted by the 1940 Act or by exemption from the provisions thereof pursuant to an exemptive order of the SEC.
If rating agencies assign different ratings to the same security, NB Management will determine which rating it believes best reflects the security's quality and risk at that time, which may be the highest of the several assigned ratings.
NHS and NOX have each applied, and New NHS will apply, for ratings for its Preferred Stock and Notes. In order to obtain and maintain these ratings, each Fund may be required to comply with investment quality, diversification and other guidelines established by the rating agency. Such guidelines will likely be more restrictive than the restrictions set forth above. Each Fund does not anticipate that such guidelines would have a material adverse effect on holders of Common Stock ("Common Stockholders") or its ability to achieve its investment objectives. New NHS currently anticipates that any Preferred Stock or Notes that it intends to issue initially would be given the highest ratings by the rating agency, but no assurance can be given that such ratings will be obtained. The rating agency would receive fees in connection with its ratings issuances.
NHS is also subject to the following non-fundamental restrictions and policies, which may be changed by the Board of Trustees. The Fund must:
1.
Diversification
. The Fund must diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year, (a) at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is represented by cash and cash items, securities of other regulated investment companies, U.S. government securities and other securities, with such other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount not greater than 5% of the value of the Fund's total assets and not greater than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (b) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund's total assets is invested in the securities (other than U.S. government securities or securities of other regulated investment companies) of any one issuer or any two or more issuers that the Fund controls and which are determined to be engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses.
2.
Investment Company Securities
. The Fund may not invest in securities of other investment companies, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder, or as may be permitted by an order of the Commission under the 1940 Act, or other relief from the provisions of the 1940 Act.
With respect to these investment restrictions and other policies described in this SAI or the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (except the Fund's policies on borrowings and the issuance of senior securities set forth above), if a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time of an investment or transaction, a later change in percentage resulting from a change in the values of investments or the value of the Fund's assets, unless otherwise stated, will not constitute a violation of such restriction or policy.
Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions.
For temporary defensive purposes, or to manage cash pending investment or payout, New NHS and NOX may invest up to 100% of their total assets in cash and cash equivalents, U.S. Government and Agency Securities, commercial paper and certain other money market instruments, as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by the foregoing.
Pursuant to an exemptive order received from the SEC, each Fund also may invest up to 25% of its total assets in shares of a money market fund managed by NB Management to manage uninvested cash and cash collateral received in connection with securities lending.
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES, TECHNIQUES AND RISKS
The following information supplements the discussion of the Funds’ investment objectives, policies and techniques included in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The Funds have substantially similar investment policies and present substantially similar general risks. Each Fund may make the following investments, among others, some of which are part of its principal investment strategies and some of which are not. The principal risks of the Funds’ principal strategies are discussed in the accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The Funds may not buy all of the types of securities or use all of the investment techniques that are described.
Fixed-Income Securities
.
Fixed-income securities are subject to the risk of an issuer's inability to meet principal and interest payments on its obligations ("credit risk") and are subject to price volatility due to such factors as interest rate sensitivity ("interest rate risk"), market perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer, and market liquidity ("market risk"). Lower-rated securities are more likely to react to developments affecting market and credit risk than are more highly-rated securities, which react primarily to movements in the general level of interest rates.
Ratings of Fixed-Income Securities
.
As discussed in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, each Fund may purchase securities rated by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's"), or any other rating agency. The ratings of any rating agency represent its opinion as to the quality of securities it undertakes to rate. Ratings are not absolute standards of quality; consequently, securities with the same maturity, duration, coupon, and rating may have different yields. Although each Fund may rely on the ratings of any rating agency, each Fund mainly refers to ratings assigned by S&P and Moody's, which are described in Appendix A. Each Fund may also invest in unrated securities that are deemed comparable in quality by NB Management to the rated securities in which that Fund may permissibly invest.
High-Quality Debt Securities
. High-quality debt securities are securities that have received a rating from at least one rating agency, such as S&P or Moody's, in one of the two highest rating categories (the highest category in the case of commercial paper) or, if not rated by any rating agency, such as U.S. Government and Agency Securities, have been determined by NB Management to be of comparable quality.
Investment Grade Debt Securities
. An investment grade debt security is a security that has received ratings, from all rating agencies that have rated it, in one of the four highest rating categories or, if not rated by any rating agency, has been determined by NB Management to be of comparable quality. Moody's deems securities rated in its fourth highest category (Baa) to have speculative characteristics; a change in economic factors could lead to a weakened capacity of the issuer to repay.
Below Investment Grade Quality Debt Securities
. Lower-rated debt securities or "junk bonds" are those rated below the fourth highest category by rating agencies that have rated them (including those securities rated as
low as D by S&P) or unrated securities of comparable quality. Securities rated below investment grade may be considered speculative. Securities rated B are judged to be predominantly speculative with respect to their capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligations. Although these securities generally offer higher yields than investment grade debt securities with similar maturities, lower-quality securities involve greater risks, including the possibility of default or bankruptcy by the issuer, or the securities may already be in default. See the additional risks described below for lower-rated debt securities.
Duration and Maturity
.
Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of debt securities to changes in market interest rates, based on the entire cash flow associated with the securities, including payments occurring before the final repayment of principal. NB Management utilizes duration as a tool in portfolio selection instead of the more traditional measure known as "term to maturity." "Term to maturity" measures only the time until a debt security provides its final payment, taking no account of the pattern of the security's payments prior to maturity. Duration incorporates a bond's yield, coupon interest payments, final maturity and call features into one measure. Duration therefore provides a more accurate measurement of a bond's likely price change in response to a given change in market interest rates. The longer the duration, the greater the bond's price movement will be as interest rates change. For any fixed-income security with interest payments occurring prior to the payment of principal, duration is always less than maturity.
Futures, options and options on futures have durations which are generally related to the duration of the securities underlying them. Holding long futures or call option positions will lengthen a Fund's duration by approximately the same amount as would holding an equivalent amount of the underlying securities. Short futures or put options have durations roughly equal to the inverse of the duration of the securities that underlie these positions, and have the effect of reducing portfolio duration by approximately the same amount as would selling an equivalent amount of the underlying securities.
There are some situations where even the standard duration calculation does not properly reflect the interest rate exposure of a security. For example, floating and variable rate securities often have final maturities of ten or more years; however, their interest rate exposure corresponds to the frequency of the coupon reset. Another example where the interest rate exposure is not properly captured by duration is the case of mortgage-backed securities. The stated final maturity of such securities is generally 30 years, but current and expected prepayment rates are critical in determining the securities' interest rate exposure. In these and other similar situations, NB Management, where permitted, will use more sophisticated analytical techniques that incorporate the economic life of a security into the determination of its interest rate exposure.
Each Fund has no limits on the maturity of its individual investments. However, it generally intends to focus on securities with maturities of 10 years or less, and to have an assumed dollar weighted average portfolio maturity of two to seven years which could vary over time.
Below Investment Grade Quality Securities
.
Each Fund may invest in below investment grade quality debt securities as well as non-investment grade preferred and convertible preferred securities and unrated securities determined by NB Management to be of comparable quality. Below investment grade quality debt securities are commonly referred to as "junk bonds." Bonds rated Baa or BBB are considered "investment grade" securities, although such bonds may be considered to possess some speculative characteristics.
Below investment grade quality securities are regarded as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer's continuing ability to meet principal and interest payments and, therefore, carry greater price volatility and principal and income risk, including the possibility of issuer default and bankruptcy and increased market price volatility. Issues rated CCC/Caa and below may be in default.
Below investment grade quality securities may be more susceptible to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive industry conditions than investment grade securities. A projection of an economic downturn or of a period of rising interest rates, for example, could cause a decline in below investment grade quality security prices because the advent of a recession could lessen the ability of an issuer to make principal and interest payments on its debt securities. If an issuer of below investment grade quality securities defaults, in addition to risking payment of all or a portion of interest and principal, a Fund may incur additional expenses to seek recovery. In the case of below investment grade quality securities structured as zero coupon securities (see the Proxy Statement/Prospectus under
"The Fund's Investments - Zero Coupon Securities, Pay-in-Kind Securities and Discount Obligations" and also see "Zero Coupon Securities," below), their market prices are affected to a greater extent by interest rate changes, and therefore tend to be more volatile, than securities that pay interest periodically and in cash. NB Management seeks to reduce these risks through diversification, credit analysis and attention to current developments and trends in both the economy and financial markets.
The secondary market on which below investment grade quality securities are traded may be less liquid than the market for higher-grade securities. Less liquidity in the secondary trading market could adversely affect the price at which a Fund could sell a below investment grade quality security, and could adversely affect the net asset value of the Common Stock. Adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the values and liquidity of below investment grade quality securities, especially in a thinly-traded market. When secondary markets for below investment grade quality securities are less liquid than the market for higher-grade securities, it may be more difficult to value the securities because such valuation may require more research, and elements of judgment may play a greater role in the valuation because there is less reliable, objective data available. During periods of thin trading in these markets, the spread between bid and asked prices is likely to increase significantly and a Fund may have greater difficulty selling its portfolio securities. A Fund will be more dependent on NB Management's research and analysis when investing in below investment grade quality securities. NB Management seeks to minimize the risks of investing in all securities through diversification, in-depth credit analysis and attention to current developments in interest rates and market conditions.
A general description of Moody's, S&P and Fitch ratings of bonds is set forth in Appendix A hereto. The ratings of Moody's, S&P and Fitch represent their opinions as to the quality of the bonds they rate. It should be emphasized, however, that ratings are general and are not absolute standards of quality. Consequently, bonds with the same maturity, coupon and rating may have different yields while obligations with the same maturity and coupon with different ratings may have the same yield. For these reasons, the use of credit ratings as the sole method of evaluating below investment grade quality securities can involve certain risks. For example, credit ratings evaluate the safety of principal and interest payments, not the market value risk of below investment grade quality securities. Also, credit rating agencies may fail to change credit ratings in a timely fashion to reflect events since the security was last rated. NB Management does not rely solely on credit ratings when selecting securities for a Fund, and develops its own independent analysis of issuer credit quality.
Each Fund's credit quality policies apply only at the time a security is purchased, and a Fund is not required to dispose of a security if a rating agency or NB Management downgrades its assessment of the credit characteristics of a particular issue. In determining whether to retain or sell such a security, NB Management may consider such factors as its assessment of the credit quality of the issuer of such security, the price at which such security could be sold and the rating, if any, assigned to such security by any rating agency. However, analysis of the creditworthiness of issuers of below investment grade quality securities may be more complex than for issuers of higher-quality debt securities.
Real Estate Companies
. New NHS and NOX will not directly invest in real estate but may invest in securities issued by Real Estate Companies. However, because of its fundamental policy to concentrate its investments in the securities of companies in the real estate industry, a Fund is subject to the risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate. These risks include declines in the value of real estate, risks associated with general and local economic conditions, possible lack of availability of mortgage funds, overbuilding, extended vacancies of properties, increased competition, increase in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws, losses due to costs resulting from the clean-up of environmental problems, liability to third parties for damages resulting from environmental problems, casualty or condemnation losses, limitation on rents, changes in neighborhood values and the appeal of properties to tenants, and changes in interest rates.
Securities of Real Estate Companies include securities of REITs, commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities and real estate financings. Such instruments are sensitive to factors such as real estate values and property taxes, interest rates, cash flow of underlying real estate assets, overbuilding and the management skill and creditworthiness of the issuer. Real estate-related instruments may also be affected by tax and regulatory requirements, such as those relating to the environment.
REITs are sometimes informally characterized as equity REITs, mortgage REITs and hybrid REITs. An equity REIT invests primarily in the fee ownership or leasehold ownership of land and buildings and derives its income primarily from rental income and may also realize capital gains (or losses) by selling real properties in its portfolio that have appreciated (or depreciated) in value. A mortgage REIT invests primarily in mortgages on real estate, which may secure construction, development or long-term loans, and generally derives its income primarily from interest payments on the credit it has extended. A hybrid REIT combines the characteristics of equity REITs and mortgage REITs, generally by holding both ownership interests and mortgage interests in real estate.
The types of REITs described above are dependent upon management skill, are not diversified and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation and the possibility of failing to qualify for conduit income tax treatment under the Code and/or failing to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act.
REITs are subject to management fees and other expenses. Therefore, investments in REITs will cause a Fund to bear its proportionate share of the costs of the REITs' operations. At the same time, a Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in the shares of REITs. It is anticipated, although not required, that under normal circumstances a majority of a Fund's investments will consist of Equity REITs.
Each Fund may also invest in mortgage-backed securities. These are fixed-income securities that represent an interest in a pool of mortgages and entitle the holder to a payout derived from the payment of principal and interest on the underlying mortgages. Like other fixed-income securities, the value of mortgage-backed securities generally rises when market interest rates fall and falls when interest rates rise. These changes in value are more pronounced the longer the duration of the pool. However, because mortgagors have the option to refinance and pay off their mortgages early, the duration of a mortgage pool is somewhat unpredictable. When interest rates decline sufficiently, many mortgagors refinance. This will limit a Fund's ability to benefit from increases in value caused by a decline in rates. When rates increase, the value of mortgage-backed securities declines, and fewer mortgagors refinance, thereby extending the duration of the pool and accentuating the decline in value. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to the risk that mortgagors will default on their payments and the value of the underlying property will be inadequate to cover the loss. Mortgages that underlie securities issued by U.S. Government instrumentalities (such as Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as defined below) generally must meet certain standards intended to reduce that risk and are usually guaranteed against such losses, but privately issued mortgage securities may not meet those standards or be guaranteed. Interests in Mortgage REITs, although they are equity securities, can be subject to many of the same risks as mortgage-backed securities.
Direct Debt Instruments
.
Direct debt includes interests in bank loans, notes and other interests in amounts owed to financial institutions by borrowers, such as companies and governments, including emerging market countries. The direct debt in which a Fund may invest may be rated below investment grade by S&P or Moody's (BB or lower by S&P or Ba or lower by Moody's) or, if unrated by either of those entities, considered by NB Management to be of comparable quality. Direct debt instruments are interests in amounts owed by corporate, governmental, or other borrowers (including emerging market countries) to lenders or lending syndicates. Purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the borrower for payment of principal and interest. The borrower may be in financial distress or may default or have a right to borrow additional cash from the owners of direct debt. If a Fund does not receive scheduled interest or principal payments on such indebtedness, the Fund’s share price and yield could be adversely affected. Direct debt instruments may involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or intermediary. In addition, there may be fewer legal protections for owners of direct debt than conventional debt securities. Direct indebtedness of developing countries involves a risk that the governmental entities responsible for the repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to pay interest and repay principal when due. See the additional risks described under “Foreign Securities” in this SAI.
Direct debt instruments may have floating interest rates. These interest rates will vary depending on the terms of the underlying loan and market conditions. Consequently, the value of direct debt instruments held by a Fund may be expected to fluctuate less than the value of other fixed rate high-yield securities as a result of changes in the interest rate environment.
Bank Loans, Loan Assignments, and Loan Participations
.
Bank loan interests are a form of direct debt instrument in which a Fund may invest by taking an assignment of all or a portion of an interest in a loan previously held by another institution or by acquiring a participation in an interest in a loan that continues to be held by another institution. A Fund may invest in secured and unsecured bank loans. Bank loans are subject to the same risks as other direct debt instruments discussed above and carry additional risks described in this section.
Floating rate securities, including bank loans, provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate at fixed intervals (
e.g
., daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually) or automatic adjustment of the interest rate whenever a specified interest rate or index changes. The interest rate on floating rate securities ordinarily is determined by reference to LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), a particular bank’s prime rate, the 90-day U.S. Treasury Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank CDs, an index of short-term tax-exempt rates or some other objective measure.
Creditworthiness.
A Fund’s ability to receive payments in connection with bank loans depends on the financial condition of the borrower. The Manager will not rely solely on another lending institution’s credit analysis of the borrower, but will perform its own investment analysis of the borrowers. The Manager’s analysis may include consideration of the borrower’s financial strength, managerial experience, debt coverage, additional borrowing requirements or debt maturity schedules, changing financial conditions, and responsiveness to changes in business conditions and interest rates. Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. In connection with the restructuring of a bank loan or other direct debt instrument outside of bankruptcy court in a negotiated work-out or in the context of bankruptcy proceedings, equity securities or junior debt securities may be received in exchange for all or a portion of an interest in the security.
Ratings
. Bank loan interests may not be rated by independent rating agencies and therefore, investments in a particular loan participation may depend almost exclusively on the credit analysis of the borrower performed by the Manager.
Agents.
Bank loans are typically administered by a bank, insurance company, finance company or other financial institution (the “agent”) for a lending syndicate of financial institutions. In a typical bank loan, the agent administers the terms of the loan agreement and is responsible for the collection of principal and interest and fee payments from the borrower and the apportionment of these payments to all lenders that are parties to the loan agreement. In addition, an institution (which may be the agent) may hold collateral on behalf of the lenders. Typically, under loan agreements, the agent is given broad authority in monitoring the borrower’s performance and is obligated to use the same care it would use in the management of its own property. In asserting rights against a borrower, a Fund normally will be dependent on the willingness of the lead bank to assert these rights, or upon a vote of all the lenders to authorize the action.
If an agent becomes insolvent, or has a receiver, conservator, or similar official appointed for it by the appropriate regulatory authority, or becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, the agent’s appointment may be terminated and a successor agent would be appointed. If an appropriate regulator or court determines that assets held by the agent for the benefit of the purchasers of bank loans are subject to the claims of the agent’s general or secured creditors, the purchasers might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on a bank loan or suffer a loss of principal and/or interest.
Collateral.
Although most of the loans in which a Fund invests are secured, there is no assurance that the collateral can be promptly liquidated, or that its liquidation value will be equal to the value of the debt. In most loan agreements there is no formal requirement to pledge additional collateral if the value of the initial collateral declines. As a result, a bank loan may not always be fully collateralized and can decline significantly in value.
If a borrower becomes insolvent, access to collateral may be limited by bankruptcy and other laws. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy may pay only a small portion of the amount owed, if they are able to pay at all. If a secured loan is foreclosed, a Fund will likely be required to bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. There is also a possibility that a Fund will become the owner of its pro rata share of the
collateral which may carry additional risks and liabilities. In addition, under legal theories of lender liability, a Fund potentially might be held liable as a co-lender.
Some bank loans are unsecured. If the borrower defaults on an unsecured bank loan, a Fund will be a general creditor and will not have rights to any specific assets of the borrower.
Liquidity.
Bank loans are generally subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Bank loans are not currently listed on any securities exchange or automatic quotation system. As a result, there may not be a recognized, liquid public market for bank loan interests.
Prepayment Risk and Maturity
. Because many bank loans are repaid early, the actual maturity of bank loans is typically shorter than their stated final maturity calculated solely on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule. The degree to which borrowers prepay bank loans, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, may be affected by general business conditions, market interest rates, the borrower’s financial condition and competitive conditions among lenders. Such prepayments may require a Fund to replace an investment with a lower yielding security which may have an adverse affect on the Fund’s share price. Prepayments cannot be predicted with accuracy. Floating rate bank loans, can be less sensitive to prepayment risk, but a Fund’s net asset value may still fluctuate in response to interest rate changes because variable interest rates may only reset periodically and may not rise or decline as much as interest rates in general.
Restrictive Covenants.
A borrower must comply with various restrictive covenants in a loan agreement such as restrictions on dividend payments and limits on total debt. The loan agreement may also contain a covenant requiring the borrower to prepay the bank loan with any free cash flow. A breach of a covenant is normally an event of default, which provides the agent or the lenders the right to call the outstanding bank loan.
Fees and Expenses
. Purchasers and sellers of bank loans may pay certain fees, such as an assignment fee. In addition, a Fund incurs expenses associated with researching and analyzing potential bank loan investments, including legal fees.
Available Information.
Bank loans normally are not registered with the SEC or any state securities commission or listed on any securities exchange. As a result, the amount of public information available about a specific bank loan historically has been less extensive than if the bank loan were registered or exchange traded.
Leveraged Buy-Out Transactions.
Loans purchased by a Fund may represent interests in loans made to finance highly leveraged corporate acquisitions, known as “leveraged buy-out” transactions, leveraged recapitalization loans and other types of acquisition financing. The highly leveraged capital structure of the borrowers in such transactions may make such loans especially vulnerable to adverse changes in economic or market conditions.
Junior Loans.
A Fund may invest in second lien secured loans and secured and unsecured subordinated loans, including bridge loans (“Junior Loans”). In the event of a bankruptcy or liquidation, second lien secured loans are generally paid only if the value of the collateral is sufficient to satisfy the borrower’s obligations to the first lien secured lenders and even then, the remaining collateral may not be sufficient to cover the amount owed to the Fund. Second lien secured loans give investors priority over general unsecured creditors in the event of an asset sale.
Junior Loans are subject to the same general risks inherent to any loan investment, including credit risk, market and liquidity risk, and interest rate risk. Due to their lower place in the borrower’s capital structure, Junior Loans involve a higher degree of overall risk than senior loans of the same borrower.
Bridge Loans.
Bridge loans or bridge facilities are short-term loan arrangements (
e.g
., 12 to 18 months) typically made by a borrower in anticipation of intermediate-term or long-term permanent financing. Most bridge loans are structured as floating-rate debt with step-up provisions under which the interest rate on the bridge loan rises over time. Thus, the longer the loan remains outstanding, the more the interest rate increases. In addition, bridge loans commonly contain a conversion feature that allows the bridge loan investor to convert its loan interest into senior exchange notes if the loan has not been prepaid in full on or prior to its maturity date. Bridge loans may
be subordinate to other debt and may be secured or unsecured. Like any loan, bridge loans involve credit risk. Bridge loans are generally made with the expectation that the borrower will be able to obtain permanent financing in the near future. Any delay in obtaining permanent financing subjects the bridge loan investor to increased risk. A borrower’s use of bridge loans also involves the risk that the borrower may be unable to locate permanent financing to replace the bridge loan, which may impair the borrower’s perceived creditworthiness.
Participation Interests – Intermediary Risk
. In a participation interest, the purchaser does not have any direct contractual relationship with the borrower. If a Fund acquires a participation interest in a bank loan, the Fund may not be able to control the exercise of any remedies that the lender would have under the loan. In addition, the Fund normally will have to rely on the participating lender to demand and receive payments in respect of the loans, and to pay those amounts on to the Fund; the Fund will be subject to the risk that the lender may be unwilling or unable to do so. In such a case, the Fund would not likely have any rights against the borrower directly.
Policies and Limitations
.
Each Fund’s policies limit the percentage of its assets that can be invested in the securities of one issuer or in issuers primarily involved in one industry. Legal interpretations by the SEC staff may require each Fund to treat both the lending bank and the borrower as “issuers” of a loan participation by the Fund. In combination, each Fund’s policies and the SEC staff’s interpretations may limit the amount the Fund can invest in loan participations.
Mortgage-Backed Securities
.
Mortgage-backed securities represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of mortgage loans. Those securities may be guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or instrumentality (such as Ginnie Mae); issued and guaranteed by government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporations, though not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (such as by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and described in greater detail below); or issued by fully private issuers. Private issuers are generally originators of and investors in mortgage loans and include savings associations, mortgage bankers, commercial banks, investment bankers, and special purpose entities. Private mortgage-backed securities may be supported by U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities or some form of non-governmental credit enhancement.
Government-related guarantors (
i.e.
, not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government) include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored corporation owned by stockholders. It is subject to general regulation by the Federal Housing Finance Authority (“FHFA”). Fannie Mae purchases residential mortgages from a list of approved seller/servicers that include state and federally chartered savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, commercial banks and credit unions and mortgage bankers. Fannie Mae guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on pass-through securities that it issues, but those securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
Freddie Mac is a government-sponsored corporation formerly owned by the twelve Federal Home Loan Banks and now owned by stockholders. Freddie Mac issues Participation Certificates (“PCs”), which represent interests in mortgages from Freddie Mac’s national portfolio. Freddie Mac guarantees the timely payment of interest and ultimate collection of principal on the PCs it issues, but those PCs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
The U.S. Treasury has historically had the authority to purchase obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In addition, in 2008, due to capitalization concerns, Congress provided the U.S. Treasury with additional authority to lend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac emergency funds and to purchase the companies’ stock, as described below. In September 2008, the U.S. Treasury and the FHFA announced that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had been placed in conservatorship.
Since 2009 both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have received significant capital support through U.S. Treasury stock purchases. The U.S. Treasury announced in December 2009 that it would continue that support for the entities’ capital as necessary to prevent a negative net worth for at least the next three years. The continuing commitment of the U.S. Treasury is critical to their solvency. In addition, the Federal Reserve exercised its separate authority in 2009 to purchase mortgage-backed securities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; the rate of those purchases is expected to slow and terminate in early 2010. While the U.S. Treasury is committed to offset negative equity at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through its stock purchases, no assurance can be given that the Federal
Reserve, U.S. Treasury, or FHFA initiatives discussed above will ensure that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will remain successful in meeting their obligations with respect to the debt and mortgage-backed securities they issue. In addition, the future of the entities is in serious question as the U.S. Government reportedly is considering multiple options, ranging on a spectrum from nationalization, privatization to abolishment.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also have been the subject of several class action lawsuits and investigations by federal regulators over certain accounting, disclosure, or corporate governance matters. Such legal proceedings and investigations, and any resulting restatements of financial statements, may adversely affect the guaranteeing entities and, as a result, the payment of principal or interest on their securities.
Mortgage-backed securities may have either fixed or adjustable interest rates. Tax or regulatory changes may adversely affect the mortgage securities market. In addition, changes in the market's perception of the issuer may affect the value of mortgage-backed securities. The rate of return on mortgage-backed securities may be affected by prepayments of principal on the underlying loans, which generally increase as market interest rates decline; as a result, when interest rates decline, holders of these securities normally do not benefit from appreciation in market value to the same extent as holders of other non-callable debt securities.
Because many mortgages are repaid early, the actual maturity and duration of mortgage-backed securities are typically shorter than their stated final maturity and their duration calculated solely on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule. In calculating its dollar-weighted average maturity and duration, a Fund may apply certain industry conventions regarding the maturity and duration of mortgage-backed instruments. Different analysts use different models and assumptions in making these determinations. Each Fund uses an approach that NB Management believes is reasonable in light of all relevant circumstances. If this determination is not borne out in practice, it could positively or negatively affect the value of a Fund when market interest rates change. Increasing market interest rates generally extend the effective maturities of mortgage-backed securities, increasing their sensitivity to interest rate changes.
Mortgage-backed securities may be issued in the form of CMOs or collateralized mortgage-backed bonds ("CBOs"). CMOs are obligations that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages; payments of principal and interest on the mortgages are passed through to the holders of the CMOs, although not necessarily on a pro rata basis, on the same schedule as they are received. CBOs are general obligations of the issuer that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages. The mortgages serve as collateral for the issuer's payment obligations on the bonds, but interest and principal payments on the mortgages are not passed through either directly (as with mortgage-backed "pass-through" securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities) or on a modified basis (as with CMOs). Accordingly, a change in the rate of prepayments on the pool of mortgages could change the effective maturity or the duration of a CMO but not that of a CBO, (although, like many bonds, CBOs may be callable by the issuer prior to maturity). To the extent that rising interest rates cause prepayments to occur at a slower than expected rate, a CMO could be converted into a longer-term security that is subject to greater risk of price volatility.
Governmental, government-related, and private entities (such as commercial banks, savings institutions, private mortgage insurance companies, mortgage bankers, and other secondary market issuers, including securities broker-dealers and special purpose entities that generally are affiliates of the foregoing established to issue such securities) may create mortgage loan pools to back CMOs and CBOs. Such issuers may be the originators and/or servicers of the underlying mortgage loans, as well as the guarantors of the mortgage-backed securities. Pools created by non-governmental issuers generally offer a higher rate of interest than governmental and government-related pools because of the absence of direct or indirect government or agency guarantees. Various forms of insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool, and hazard insurance and letters of credit, may support timely payment of interest and principal of non-governmental pools. Governmental entities, private insurers, and mortgage poolers issue these forms of insurance and guarantees. NB Management considers such insurance and guarantees, as well as the creditworthiness of the issuers thereof, in determining whether a mortgage-backed security meets a Fund's investment quality standards. There can be no assurance that private insurers or guarantors can meet their obligations under insurance policies or guarantee arrangements. Each Fund may buy mortgage-backed securities without insurance or guarantees, if NB Management determines that the securities meet that Fund's quality standards. NB Management will, consistent with a Fund's investment objectives, policies and limitations and quality
standards, consider making investments in new types of mortgage-backed securities as such securities are developed and offered to investors.
Asset-Backed Securities
. Asset-backed securities represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of assets such as, among other things, motor vehicle installment sales contracts, installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and receivables from revolving credit (credit card) agreements, or a combination of the foregoing. These assets are securitized through the use of trusts and special purpose corporations. Credit enhancements, such as various forms of cash collateral accounts or letters of credit, may support payments of principal and interest on asset-backed securities. Although these securities may be supported by letters of credit or other credit enhancements, payment of interest and principal ultimately depends upon individuals paying the underlying loans, which may be affected adversely by general downturns in the economy. Asset-backed securities are subject to the same risk of prepayment described with respect to mortgage-backed securities. The risk that recovery on repossessed collateral might be unavailable or inadequate to support payments, however, is greater for asset-backed securities than for mortgage-backed securities.
Each Fund may invest in trust preferred securities, which are a type of asset-backed security. Trust preferred securities represent interests in a trust formed by a parent company to finance its operations. The trust sells preferred shares and invests the proceeds in debt securities of the parent. This debt may be subordinated and unsecured. Dividend payments on the trust preferred securities match the interest payments on the debt securities; if no interest is paid on the debt securities, the trust will not make current payments on its preferred securities. Unlike typical asset-backed securities, which have many underlying payors and are usually overcollateralized, trust preferred securities have only one underlying payor and are not overcollateralized. Issuers of trust preferred securities and their parents currently enjoy favorable tax treatment. If the tax characterization of trust preferred securities were to change, they could be redeemed by the issuers, which could result in a loss to a Fund.
Asset-Backed Securities Risk
.
Payment of interest and repayment of principal on asset-backed securities may be largely dependent upon the cash flows generated by the assets backing the securities and, in certain cases, supported by letters of credit, surety bonds, or other credit enhancements. Asset-backed security values may also be affected by the creditworthiness of the servicing agent for the pool, the originator of the loans or receivables, or the entities providing the credit enhancement. In addition, these securities may be subject to prepayment risk.
Variable or Floating Rate Securities; Demand and Put Features
. Variable rate securities provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate at fixed intervals (e.g., daily, monthly, or semi-annually); floating rate securities provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate whenever a specified interest rate or index changes. The interest rate on variable and floating rate securities (collectively, "Adjustable Rate Securities") ordinarily is determined by reference to a particular bank's prime rate, the 90-day U.S. Treasury Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank CDs, an index of short-term tax-exempt rates or some other objective measure.
Adjustable Rate Securities frequently permit the holder to demand payment of the obligations' principal and accrued interest at any time or at specified intervals not exceeding one year. The demand feature usually is backed by a credit instrument (
e.g
., a bank letter of credit) from a creditworthy issuer and sometimes by insurance from a creditworthy insurer. Without these credit enhancements, some Adjustable Rate Securities might not meet a Fund's quality standards. Accordingly, in purchasing these securities, a Fund relies primarily on the creditworthiness of the credit instrument issuer or the insurer. Each Fund can also buy fixed rate securities accompanied by a demand feature or by a put option, which permits a Fund to sell the security to the issuer or third party at a specified price. Each Fund may rely on the creditworthiness of issuers of the credit enhancements in purchasing these securities.
Warrants
. Warrants may be acquired by each Fund in connection with other securities or separately and provide a Fund with the right to purchase at a later date other securities of the issuer. Warrants are securities permitting, but not obligating, their holder to subscribe for other securities or commodities. Warrants do not carry with them the right to dividends or voting rights with respect to the securities that they entitle their holder to purchase, and they do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuer. As a result, warrants may be considered more speculative than certain other types of investments. In addition, the value of a warrant does not necessarily change with the value of the underlying securities and a warrant ceases to have value if it is not exercised prior to its expiration date.
Illiquid Securities
. NOX and NHS may each invest up to 20% of its total assets and New NHS may invest without limit, in illiquid securities. Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be expected to be sold within seven days at approximately the price at which they are valued. These may include unregistered or other restricted securities, repurchase agreements maturing in greater than seven days, written over-the-counter ("OTC") options, securities or other liquid assets being used as cover for such options, certain loan participation interests, fixed time deposits that are not subject to prepayment or provide for withdrawal penalties upon prepayment (other than overnight deposits). Illiquid securities may also include commercial paper under section 4(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 144A securities (restricted securities that may be traded freely among qualified institutional buyers pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the securities laws); these securities are considered illiquid unless NB Management, acting pursuant to guidelines established by each Fund’s Board of Directors/Trustees, determines they are liquid. Generally, foreign securities freely tradable in their principal market are not considered restricted or illiquid. Illiquid securities may be difficult for a Fund to value or dispose of due to the absence of an active trading market. A Fund's sale of some illiquid securities may be subject to legal restrictions that could be costly to it.
Repurchase Agreements
. In a repurchase agreement, a Fund purchases securities from a bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System or from a securities dealer that agrees to repurchase the securities from the Fund at a higher price on a designated future date. The agreed-upon repurchase price determines the yield during the Fund's holding period. Repurchase agreements are considered to be loans collateralized by the underlying security that is the subject of the repurchase contract. Repurchase agreements generally are for a short period of time, usually less than a week. Costs, delays or losses could result if the selling party to a repurchase agreement becomes bankrupt or otherwise defaults. NB Management monitors the creditworthiness of sellers.
Policies and Limitations
. Repurchase agreements with a maturity of more than seven days are considered to be illiquid securities. Each Fund may enter into a repurchase agreement only if (1) the underlying securities are of a
type that the Fund's investment policies and limitations would allow it to purchase directly, (2) the market value of the underlying securities, including accrued interest, at all times equals or exceeds the repurchase price and (3) payment for the underlying securities is made only upon satisfactory evidence that the securities are being held for the Fund's account by its custodian or a bank acting as the Fund's agent.
Securities Loans
. Each Fund may lend portfolio securities to banks, brokerage firms and other institutional investors judged creditworthy by NB Management, provided that cash or equivalent collateral, equal to at least 100% of the market value of the loaned securities, is continuously maintained by the borrower with the Fund. Each Fund may invest the cash collateral and earn income, or it may receive an agreed-upon amount of interest income from a borrower who has delivered equivalent collateral. During the time securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Fund an amount equivalent to any dividends or interest paid on such securities. These loans are subject to termination at the option of the Fund or the borrower. Each Fund may pay reasonable administrative and custodial fees in connection with a loan and may pay a negotiated portion of the interest earned on the cash or equivalent collateral to the borrower or placing broker. Each Fund does not have the right to vote securities on loan but would terminate the loan and regain the right to vote if that were considered important with respect to the investment. NB Management believes the risk of loss on these transactions is slight because, if a borrower were to default for any reason, the collateral should satisfy the obligation. However, as with other extensions of secured credit, loans of portfolio securities involve some risk of loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund may lend its securities with a value not exceeding 33-1/3% of its total assets to banks, brokerage firms or other institutional investors judged creditworthy by NB Management. Borrowers are required continuously to secure their obligations to return securities on loan from the Fund by depositing collateral in a form determined to be satisfactory by the Board. The collateral, which must be marked to market daily, must be equal to at least 102% of the market value of the loaned securities, which will also be marked to market daily.
Restricted Securities and Rule 144A Securities
. Each Fund may invest in restricted securities, which are securities that may not be sold to the public without an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act. Before they are registered, such securities may be sold only in a privately negotiated transaction or pursuant to an exemption from registration. In recognition of the increased size and liquidity of the institutional market for unregistered securities and the importance of institutional investors in the formation of capital, the SEC has adopted Rule 144A under the 1933 Act. Rule 144A is designed to facilitate efficient trading among institutional investors by permitting the sale of certain unregistered securities to qualified institutional buyers. To the extent privately-placed securities held by a Fund qualify under Rule 144A and an institutional market develops for those securities, the Fund likely will be able to dispose of the securities without registering them under the 1933 Act. To the extent that institutional buyers become, for a time, uninterested in purchasing these securities, investing in Rule 144A securities could increase the level of a Fund's illiquidity. NB Management, acting under guidelines established by the Board, may determine that certain securities qualified for trading under Rule 144A are liquid. Regulation S under the 1933 Act permits the sale abroad of securities that are not registered for sale in the United States.
Where registration is required, a Fund may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses, and a considerable period may elapse between the decision to sell and the time the Fund may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, a Fund might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to sell. Restricted securities for which no market exists are priced by a method that the Board believes accurately reflects fair value.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a Fund sells portfolio securities subject to its agreement to repurchase the securities at a later date for a fixed price reflecting a market rate of interest. There is a risk that the counter-party to a reverse repurchase agreement will be unable or unwilling to complete the transaction as scheduled, which may result in losses to a Fund.
Policies and Limitations
. Reverse repurchase agreements are considered borrowings for purposes of each Fund's investment policies and limitations concerning borrowings. While a reverse repurchase agreement is outstanding, a Fund will deposit in a segregated account with its custodian cash or appropriate liquid securities, marked to market daily, in an amount at least equal to the Fund's obligations under the agreement.
Foreign Securities
. Each Fund may invest in U.S. dollar-denominated securities of non-U.S. issuers and foreign branches of U.S. banks that are located in countries considered by NB Management to be industrialized; such securities include negotiable certificates of deposit ("CDs"), bankers' acceptances and commercial paper. Non-U.S. issuers are issuers organized and doing business principally outside the United States and include banks, non-U.S. governments and quasi-governmental organizations. While investments in foreign securities are intended to reduce risk by providing further diversification, such investments involve sovereign and other risks, in addition to the credit and market risks normally associated with domestic securities. These additional risks include the possibility of adverse political and economic developments (including political instability, nationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation) and the potentially adverse effects of unavailability of public information regarding issuers, less governmental supervision and regulation of financial markets, reduced liquidity of certain financial markets and the lack of uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards or the application of standards that are different or less stringent than those applied in the United States; different laws and customs governing securities tracking; and possibly limited access to the courts to enforce a Fund's rights as investor.
Each Fund also may invest in equity, debt or other income-producing securities that are denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, including (1) common and preferred stocks, (2) CDs, commercial paper, fixed time deposits and bankers' acceptances issued by foreign banks, (3) obligations of other corporations and (4) obligations of foreign governments and their subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, international agencies and supranational entities. Investing in foreign currency-denominated securities involves the special risks associated with investing in non-U.S. issuers, as described in the preceding paragraph, and the additional risks of (a) adverse changes in foreign exchange rates and (b) adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations (which could prevent cash from being brought back to the United States). Additionally, dividends and interest payable on foreign securities (and gains realized on disposition thereof) may be subject to foreign taxes, including taxes withheld from those payments. Commissions on foreign securities exchanges are often at fixed rates and are generally higher than negotiated commissions on U.S. exchanges, although each Fund endeavors to achieve the most favorable net results on its portfolio transactions.
Foreign securities often trade with less frequency and in less volume than domestic securities and therefore may exhibit greater price volatility. Additional costs associated with an investment in foreign securities may include higher custodial fees than apply to domestic custody arrangements and transaction costs of foreign currency conversions.
Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures. In certain markets, there have been times when settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when a portion of the assets of a Fund is uninvested and no return is earned thereon. The inability of a Fund to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause it to miss attractive investment opportunities. Inability to dispose of portfolio securities due to settlement problems could result in losses to a Fund due to subsequent declines in value of the securities or, if a Fund has entered into a contract to sell the securities, could result in possible liability to the purchaser.
Interest rates prevailing in other countries may affect the prices of foreign securities and exchange rates for foreign currencies. Local factors, including the strength of the local economy, the demand for borrowing, the government's fiscal and monetary policies and the international balance of payments, often affect interest rates in other countries. Individual foreign economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, and balance of payments position.
Each Fund may invest in ADRs, European Depositary Receipts ("EDRs"), Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs"), and International Depositary Receipts ("IDRs"). ADRs (sponsored or unsponsored) are receipts typically issued by a U.S. bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. Most ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and are traded on a U.S. stock exchange. However, they are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate if, as is often the case, the underlying securities are denominated in a foreign currency. Issuers of the securities underlying sponsored ADRs, but not unsponsored ADRs, are contractually obligated to disclose material information in the United States. Therefore, the market value of unsponsored ADRs is less likely to reflect the effect of such information. EDRs and IDRs are receipts typically issued by a European bank
or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. GDRs are receipts issued by either a U.S. or non-U.S. banking institution evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities and are often denominated in U.S. dollars.
Policies and Limitations
. To limit the risks inherent in investing in foreign currency denominated securities of non-U.S. issuers located in countries considered by NB Management to be industrialized, each Fund may not purchase such securities if, as a result, more than 25% of its total assets (taken at market value) would be invested in such securities. Within those limitations, however, a Fund is not restricted in the amount it may invest in securities denominated in any one foreign currency.
Investments in securities of foreign issuers are subject to a Fund's quality standards. Each Fund may invest only in securities of issuers in countries whose governments are considered stable by NB Management.
Commercial Paper
. Commercial paper is a short-term debt security issued by a corporation, bank or other issuer, usually for purposes such as financing current operations. Each Fund may invest in commercial paper that cannot be resold to the public without an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act. While restricted commercial paper normally is deemed illiquid, NB Management may in certain cases determine that such paper is liquid, pursuant to guidelines established by the Board.
Bank Obligations
. Each Fund may invest in bank obligations, including negotiable CDs, banker's acceptances, fixed time deposits and deposit notes. A CD is a short-term negotiable certificate issued by a commercial bank against funds deposited in the bank and is either interest-bearing or purchased on a discount basis. A bankers' acceptance is a short-term draft drawn on a commercial bank by a borrower, usually in connection with an international commercial transaction. The borrower is liable for payment as is the bank, which unconditionally guarantees to pay the draft at its face amount on the maturity date. Fixed time deposits are obligations of branches of U.S. banks or foreign banks that are payable at a stated maturity date and bear a fixed rate of interest. Although fixed time deposits do not have a market, there are no contractual restrictions on the right to transfer a beneficial interest in the deposit to a third party. Deposit notes are notes issued by commercial banks that generally bear fixed rates on interest and typically have original maturities ranging from eighteen months to five years.
Banks are subject to extensive governmental regulations that may limit both the amounts and types of loans and other financial commitments that may be made and the interest rates and fees that may be charged. The profitability of this industry is largely dependent upon that availability and cost of capital funds for the purpose of financing lending operations under prevailing money market conditions. Also, general economic conditions play an important part in the operations of this industry and exposure to credit losses arising from possible financial difficulties of borrowers might affect a bank's ability to meet its obligations. Bank obligations may be general obligations of the parent bank or may be limited to the issuing branch by the terms of the specific obligations or by governmental regulation. In addition, securities of foreign banks and foreign branches of U.S. banks may involve investment risks in addition to those relating to domestic bank obligations. Such risks include future political and economic developments, the possible seizure or nationalization of foreign deposits and the possible adoption of foreign governmental restrictions that might adversely affect the payment of principal and interest on such obligations. In addition, foreign branches of U.S. banks and foreign banks may be subject to less stringent reserve requirements and non-U.S. issuers generally are subject to different accounting, auditing, reporting and recordkeeping standards than those applicable to U.S. issuers.
Zero Coupon Securities
. Each Fund may invest in zero coupon securities, which are debt obligations that do not entitle the holder to any periodic payment of interest prior to maturity or that specify a future date when the securities begin to pay current interest. Zero coupon securities are issued and traded at a discount from their face amount or par value. This discount varies depending on prevailing interest rates, the time remaining until cash payments begin, the liquidity of the security and the perceived credit quality of the issuer.
Zero coupon securities are redeemed at face value when they mature. The discount on zero coupon securities ("original issue discount" or "OID") must be taken into income by a Fund as it accrues prior to the receipt of any actual payments. Because a Fund must distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income (including its accrued original issue discount) to its stockholders each year to avoid payment of federal income and
excise taxes, it may have to dispose of portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash, or may be required to borrow, to satisfy its distribution requirements. See "Tax Matters."
The market prices of zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the prices of securities that pay interest periodically. Zero coupon securities are likely to respond to changes in interest rates to a greater degree than other types of debt securities having a similar maturity and credit quality. Because these securities usually trade at a deep discount, they will be subject to greater fluctuations of market value in response to changing interest rates than debt obligations of comparable maturities that make periodic distributions of interest. On the other hand, because there are no periodic interest payments to be reinvested prior to maturity, zero coupon securities eliminate the reinvestment risk and lock in a rate of return to maturity.
Convertible Securities
. Each Fund may invest in convertible securities. A convertible security is a bond, debenture, note, preferred stock or other security that may be converted into or exchanged for a prescribed amount of common stock of the same or a different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. Convertible securities generally have features of both common stocks and debt securities. A convertible security entitles the holder to receive the interest paid or accrued on debt or the dividend paid on preferred stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion, such securities ordinarily provide a stream of income with generally higher yields than common stocks of the same or similar issuers, but lower than the yield on non-convertible debt. Convertible securities are usually subordinated to comparable-tier non-convertible securities but rank senior to common stock in a corporation's capital structure. The value of a convertible security is a function of (1) its yield in comparison to the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege and (2) its worth if converted into the underlying common stock.
The price of a convertible security often reflects variations in the price of the underlying common stock in a way that non-convertible debt may not. Convertible securities are typically issued by smaller capitalization companies whose stock prices may be volatile. A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the security's governing instrument. If a convertible security held by a Fund is called for redemption, the Fund will be required to convert it into the underlying common stock, sell it to a third party or permit the issuer to redeem the security. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on a Fund and its ability to achieve its investment objectives.
Inflation-Indexed Securities
. Each Fund may invest in U.S. Treasury securities whose principal value is adjusted daily in accordance with changes to the Consumer Price Index. Such securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Interest is calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. The principal value of inflation-indexed securities declines in periods of deflation, but holders at maturity receive no less than par. If inflation is lower than expected during the period a Fund holds the security, the Fund may earn less on it than on a conventional bond.
Because the coupon rate on inflation-indexed securities is lower than fixed-rate U.S. Treasury securities, the Consumer Price Index would have to rise at least to the amount of the difference between the coupon rate of the fixed rate U.S. Treasury issues and the coupon rate of the inflation-indexed securities, assuming all other factors are equal, in order for such securities to match the performance of the fixed-rate Treasury securities. Inflation-indexed securities are expected to react primarily to changes in the "real" interest rate (i.e., the nominal (or stated) rate less the rate of inflation), while a typical bond reacts to changes in the nominal interest rate. Accordingly, inflation-indexed securities have characteristics of fixed-rate Treasury securities having a shorter duration. Changes in market interest rates from causes other than inflation will likely affect the market prices of inflation-indexed securities in the same manner as conventional bonds.
Any increase in principal value of an inflation-indexed security is taxable in the year the increase occurs, even though holders do not receive cash representing the increase until the security matures. Because a Fund must distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income (including its non-cash income such as those principal increases) to its stockholders each year to avoid payment of federal income and excise taxes, it may have to dispose of portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances, or may be required to borrow, to obtain the cash necessary to distribute the accrued taxable income on inflation-indexed securities. See "Tax Matters."
Swap Agreements
. Each Fund may enter into swap agreements to manage or gain exposure to particular types of investments (including equity securities or indices of equity securities in which a Fund otherwise could not invest efficiently). In a swap agreement, one party agrees to make regular payments equal to a floating rate on a specified amount in exchange for payments equal to a fixed rate, or a different floating rate, on the same amount for a specified period.
Swap agreements may involve leverage and may be highly volatile; depending on how they are used, they may have a considerable impact on a Fund's performance. The risks of swap agreements depend upon the other party's creditworthiness and ability to perform, as well as a Fund's ability to terminate its swap agreements or reduce its exposure through offsetting transactions. Swap agreements may be illiquid. The swap market is relatively new and is largely unregulated.
Policies and Limitations
. In accordance with SEC staff requirements, a Fund will segregate cash or appropriate liquid securities in an amount equal to its obligations under swap agreements; when an agreement provides for netting of the payments by the two parties, a Fund will segregate only the amount of its net obligation, if any.
Credit Default Swaps
.
Each Fund may enter into credit default swap contracts for hedging purposes or to add leverage to the portfolio. When used for hedging purposes, a Fund would be the buyer of a credit default swap contract. In that case, the Fund would be entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation from the counterparty to the contract in the event of a default by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer, on the debt obligation. In return, the Fund would pay to the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no event of default has occurred. If no default occurs, the Fund would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefit from the contract. When the Fund is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay upon default of the referenced debt obligation. As the seller, the Fund would effectively add leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. A Fund will not enter into a credit default swap in which it is the seller if, as a result, the notional amount of all such swaps would exceed 10% of the Fund's Managed Assets. A Fund's obligation as the seller of a credit default swap will be subject to the leverage limitations of the 1940 Act, and which are discussed in the prospectus, unless the Fund segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid investments in an amount marked to market on a daily basis equal to its obligation under the swap.
Dollar Rolls
. In a "dollar roll," a Fund sells securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously agrees to repurchase substantially similar (
i.e
., same type and coupon) securities on a specified future date from the same party. During the period before the repurchase, the Fund forgoes principal and interest payments on the securities. The Fund is compensated by the difference between the current sales price and the forward price for the future purchase (often referred to as the "drop"), as well as by the interest earned on the cash proceeds of the initial sale. Dollar rolls may increase fluctuations in a Fund's net asset value ("NAV") and may be viewed as a form of leverage. A "covered roll" is a specific type of dollar roll in which a Fund holds an offsetting cash position or a cash-equivalent securities position that matures on or before the forward settlement date of the dollar roll transaction. There is a risk that the counterparty will be unable or unwilling to complete the transaction as scheduled, which may result in losses to a Fund. NB Management monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties to dollar rolls.
Policies and Limitations
. Dollar rolls are considered borrowings for purposes of each Fund's investment policies and limitations concerning borrowings.
Securities of Other Investment Companies
. Each Fund may invest in shares of other investment companies. Such investment may be the most practical or only manner in which a Fund can participate in certain foreign markets because of the expenses involved or because other vehicles for investing in those countries may not be available at the time a Fund is ready to make an investment. A Fund at times may invest in instruments structured as investment companies to gain exposure to the performance of a recognized securities index, such as the Standard & Poor's 500 Composite Stock Index ("S&P 500 Index") or for other appropriate purposes. As a stockholder in an investment company, a Fund would bear its pro rata share of that investment company's expenses. Investment in closed-end funds may involve the payment of substantial premiums above the value of such fund's portfolio
securities. Each Fund does not intend to invest in such funds unless, in the judgment of NB Management, the potential benefits of such investment justify the payment of any applicable premium or sales charge.
Policies and Limitations
. Except for investments in a money market fund managed by NB Management for cash management purposes, each Fund's investment in securities of other registered investment companies is limited to (i) 3% of the total voting stock of any one investment company, (ii) 5% of the Fund's total assets with respect to any one investment company and (iii) 10% of the Fund's total assets in the aggregate.
Pursuant to an exemptive order received from the SEC, the Fund also may invest up to 25% of its total assets in shares of a money market fund managed by NB Management to manage uninvested cash and cash collateral received in connection with securities lending.
FUTURES CONTRACTS, OPTIONS ON FUTURES CONTRACTS, OPTIONS ON SECURITIES AND INDICES, FORWARD CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS ON FOREIGN CURRENCIES (COLLECTIVELY, "FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS")
Futures Contracts and Options Thereon
. Each Fund may purchase and sell interest rate futures contracts, stock and bond index futures contracts and foreign currency futures contracts and may purchase and sell options thereon in an attempt to hedge against changes in the prices of securities or, in the case of foreign currency futures and options thereon, to hedge against changes in prevailing currency exchange rates. Because the futures markets may be more liquid than the cash markets, the use of futures contracts permits a Fund to enhance portfolio liquidity and maintain a defensive position without having to sell portfolio securities. Each Fund views investment in (i) single stock interest rate and securities index futures and options thereon as a maturity management device and/or a device to reduce risk or preserve total return in an adverse environment for the hedged securities and (ii) foreign currency futures and options thereon as a means of establishing more definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies that are held or intended to be acquired by the Fund.
For purposes of managing cash flow, each Fund may purchase and sell stock index futures contracts, and may purchase and sell options thereon, to increase its exposure to the performance of a recognized securities index, such as the S&P 500 Index.
A "sale" of a futures contract (or a "short" futures position) entails the assumption of a contractual obligation to deliver the securities or currency underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time. A "purchase" of a futures contract (or a "long" futures position) entails the assumption of a contractual obligation to acquire the securities or currency underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time. Certain futures, including stock and bond index futures, are settled on a net cash payment basis rather than by the sale and delivery of the securities underlying the futures.
U.S. futures contracts (except certain currency futures) are traded on exchanges that have been designated as "contract markets" by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"); futures transactions must be executed through a futures commission merchant that is a member of the relevant contract market. In both U.S. and foreign markets, an exchange's affiliated clearing organization guarantees performance of the contracts between the clearing members of the exchange.
Although futures contracts by their terms may require the actual delivery or acquisition of the underlying securities or currency, in most cases the contractual obligation is extinguished by being offset before the expiration of the contract. A futures position is offset by buying (to offset an earlier sale) or selling (to offset an earlier purchase) an identical futures contract calling for delivery in the same month. This may result in a profit or loss. While futures contracts entered into by a Fund will usually be liquidated in this manner, a Fund may instead make or take delivery of underlying securities or currency whenever it appears economically advantageous for it to do so.
"Margin" with respect to a futures contract is the amount of assets that must be deposited by a Fund with, or for the benefit of, a futures commission merchant or broker in order to initiate and maintain the Fund's futures positions. The margin deposit made by a Fund when it enters into a futures contract ("initial margin") is intended to assure its performance of the contract. If the price of the futures contract changes -- increases in the case of a short
(sale) position or decreases in the case of a long (purchase) position -- so that the unrealized loss on the contract causes the margin deposit not to satisfy margin requirements, a Fund will be required to make an additional margin deposit ("variation margin"). However, if favorable price changes in the futures contract cause the margin deposit to exceed the required margin, the excess variation margin will be paid to the Fund. In computing its NAV, a Fund marks to market the value of its open futures positions. A Fund also must make margin deposits with respect to options on futures that it has written (but not with respect to options on futures that it has purchased). If the futures commission merchant or broker holding the margin deposit goes bankrupt, a Fund could suffer a delay in recovering its funds and could ultimately suffer a loss.
An option on a futures contract gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in the contract (a long position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the option exercise period. The writer of the option is required upon exercise to assume a short futures position (if the option is a call) or a long futures position (if the option is a put). Upon exercise of the option, the accumulated cash balance in the writer's futures margin account is delivered to the holder of the option. That balance represents the amount by which the market price of the futures contract at exercise exceeds, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option. Options on futures have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein.
Although each Fund believes that the use of futures contracts and options will benefit it, if NB Management's judgment about the general direction of the markets or about interest rate or currency exchange rate trends is incorrect, a Fund's overall return would be lower than if it had not entered into any such contracts. The prices of futures contracts and options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in interest or currency exchange rates, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political and economic events. At best, the correlation between changes in prices of futures contracts or options and of securities being hedged can be only approximate due to differences between the futures and securities markets or differences between the securities or currencies underlying a Fund's futures or options position and the securities held by or to be purchased for a Fund. The currency futures or options market may be dominated by short-term traders seeking to profit from changes in exchange rates. This would reduce the value of such contracts used for hedging purposes over a short-term period. Such distortions are generally minor and would diminish as the contract approaches maturity.
Because of the low margin deposits required, futures trading involves an extremely high degree of leverage; as a result, a relatively small price movement in a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss, or gain, to the investor. Losses that may arise from certain futures transactions are potentially unlimited.
Most U.S. futures exchanges limit the amount of fluctuation in the price of a futures contract or option thereon during a single trading day; once the daily limit has been reached, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. The daily limit governs only price movements during a particular trading day, however; it thus does not limit potential losses. In fact, it may increase the risk of loss, because prices can move to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing liquidation of unfavorable futures and options positions and subjecting traders to substantial losses. If this were to happen with respect to a position a Fund held, it could have an adverse impact on its NAV.
Single stock and narrow-based security index futures, and options thereon, have not been permitted to trade in the United States until very recently. Therefore, it may be very difficult, at least initially, to predict how the markets in these instruments will behave, particularly in unusual circumstances. In addition, as some of the markets on which such instruments will trade are also new (such as derivatives transaction execution facilities or "DTEFs"), they have no operating history. In addition, DTEFs are principal markets; therefore, no clearing house in effect guarantees performance of the counter-party to a contract executed on a DTEF.
New options and futures contracts and other financial products may be developed from time to time. Each Fund may invest in any such options, contracts and products as may be developed to the extent consistent with its investment objectives and the regulatory requirements applicable to investment companies.
Risks of Futures and Options on Futures.
The use by a Fund of futures contracts and options on futures contracts to hedge interest rate risks involves special considerations and risks, as described below.
Successful use of hedging transactions depends upon NBFI’s ability to correctly predict the direction of changes in interest rates. While NBFI is experienced in the use of these instruments, there can be no assurance that any particular hedging strategy will succeed.
There might be imperfect correlation, or even no correlation, between the price movements of a futures or option contract and the movements of the interest rates being hedged. Such a lack of correlation might occur due to factors unrelated to the interest rates being hedged, such as market liquidity and speculative or other pressures on the markets in which the hedging instrument is traded.
Hedging strategies, if successful, can reduce risk of loss by wholly or partially offsetting the negative effect of unfavorable movements in the interest rates being hedged. However, hedging strategies can also reduce opportunity for gain by offsetting the positive effect of favorable movements in the hedged interest rates.
There is no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for any particular futures contract or option thereon at any particular time. If a Fund were unable to liquidate a futures contract or an option on a futures contract position due to the absence of a liquid secondary market or the imposition of price limits, it could incur substantial losses. A Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position.
There is no assurance that a Fund will use hedging transactions. For example, if a Fund determines that the cost of hedging will exceed the potential benefit to it, it will not enter into such transaction.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund may purchase and sell futures contracts and options thereon in an attempt to hedge against changes in the prices of securities or, in the case of foreign currency futures and options thereon, to hedge against prevailing currency exchange rates. A Fund will not engage in transactions in futures and options on futures for speculation.
Each Fund may purchase and sell stock index futures contracts and options thereon. For purposes of managing cash flow, the managers may use such futures and options to increase a Fund’s exposure to the performance of a recognized securities index, such as the S&P 500 Index.
As evidence of this hedging intent, New NHS and NHS expects that on 75% or more of the occasions on which it takes a long futures or option position (involving the purchase of futures contracts), a Fund will have purchased, or will be in the process of purchasing, equivalent amounts of related securities or assets denominated in the related currency in the cash market at the time when the futures or option position is closed out. However, in particular cases, when it is economically advantageous for a Fund to do so, a long futures position may be terminated or an option may expire without the corresponding purchase of securities or other assets.
Call Options on Securities
. Each Fund may write covered call options and may purchase call options on securities. The purpose of writing call options is to hedge (
i.e
., to reduce, at least in part, the effect of price fluctuations of securities held by a Fund on its NAV) or to earn premium income. Portfolio securities on which call options may be written and purchased by a Fund are purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent with its investment objectives.
When a Fund writes a call option, it is obligated to sell a security to a purchaser at a specified price at any time until a certain date if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. A Fund receives a premium for writing the call option. So long as the obligation of the call option continues, a Fund may be assigned an exercise notice, requiring it to deliver the underlying security against payment of the exercise price. A Fund may be obligated to deliver securities underlying an option at less than the market price.
The writing of covered call options is a conservative investment technique that is believed to involve relatively little risk but is capable of enhancing a Fund's total return. When writing a covered call option, a Fund, in return for the premium, gives up the opportunity for profit from a price increase in the underlying security above the exercise price, but conversely retains the risk of loss should the price of the security decline.
If a call option that a Fund has written expires unexercised, it will realize a gain in the amount of the premium; however, that gain may be offset by a decline in the market value of the underlying security during the option period. If the call option is exercised, the Fund will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security.
When a Fund purchases a call option, it pays a premium for the right to purchase a security from the writer at a specified price until a specified date.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund may write covered call options and may purchase call options on securities. Each Fund may also write covered call options and may purchase call options in related closing transactions. A Fund writes only "covered" call options on securities it owns (in contrast to the writing of "naked" or uncovered call options, which the Fund will not do).
A Fund would purchase a call option to offset a previously written call option. A Fund also may purchase a call option to protect against an increase in the price of the securities it intends to purchase.
Put Options on Securities
. Each Fund may write and purchase put options on securities. A Fund will receive a premium for writing a put option, which obligates it to acquire a security at a certain price at any time until a certain date if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. A Fund may be obligated to purchase the underlying security at more than its current value.
When a Fund purchases a put option, it pays a premium to the writer for the right to sell a security to the writer for a specified amount at any time until a certain date. A Fund would purchase a put option in order to protect itself against a decline in the market value of a security it owns.
Portfolio securities on which put options may be written and purchased by a Fund are purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent with its investment objectives. When writing a put option, a Fund, in return for the premium, takes the risk that it must purchase the underlying security at a price that may be higher than the current market price of the security. If a put option that a Fund has written expires unexercised, it will realize a gain in the amount of the premium.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund generally writes and purchases put options on securities for hedging purposes (
e.g
., to reduce, at least in part, the effect of price fluctuations of securities the Fund holds on its NAV).
General Information About Securities Options
. The exercise price of an option may be below, equal to or above the market value of the underlying security at the time the option is written. Options normally have expiration dates between three and nine months from the date written. American-style options are exercisable at any time prior to their expiration date. The obligation under any option written by a Fund terminates upon expiration of the option or, at an earlier time, when a Fund offsets the option by entering into a "closing purchase transaction" to purchase an option of the same series. If an option is purchased by a Fund and is never exercised or closed out, the Fund will lose the entire amount of the premium paid.
Options are traded both on U.S. national securities exchanges and in the OTC market. Exchange-traded options are issued by a clearing organization affiliated with the exchange on which the option is listed; the clearing organization in effect guarantees completion of every exchange-traded option. In contrast, OTC options are contracts between a Fund and a counter-party, with no clearing organization guarantee. Thus, when a Fund sells (or purchases) an OTC option, it generally will be able to "close out" the option prior to its expiration only by entering into a closing transaction with the dealer to whom (or from whom) a Fund originally sold (or purchased) the option. There can be no assurance that a Fund would be able to liquidate an OTC option at any time prior to expiration. Unless a Fund is able to effect a closing purchase transaction in a covered OTC call option it has written, it will not be able to liquidate securities used as cover until the option expires or is exercised or until different cover is substituted. In the event of the counter-party's insolvency, a Fund may be unable to liquidate its options position and the associated cover. NB Management monitors the creditworthiness of dealers with which a Fund may engage in OTC options transactions.
The premium received (or paid) by a Fund when it writes (or purchases) an option is the amount at which the option is currently traded on the applicable market. The premium may reflect, among other things, the current market price of the underlying security, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying security, the length of the option period, the general supply of and demand for credit, and the interest rate environment. The premium received by a Fund for writing an option is recorded as a liability on the Fund's statement of assets and liabilities. This liability is adjusted daily to the option's current market value.
Closing transactions are effected in order to realize a profit (or minimize a loss) on an outstanding option, to prevent an underlying security from being called, or to permit the sale or the put of the underlying security. Furthermore, effecting a closing transaction permits a Fund to write another call option on the underlying security with a different exercise price or expiration date or both. There is, of course, no assurance that a Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at favorable prices. If a Fund cannot enter into such a transaction, it may be required to hold a security that it might otherwise have sold (or purchase a security that it would not have otherwise bought), in which case it would continue to be at market risk on the security.
A Fund will realize a profit or loss from a closing purchase transaction if the cost of the transaction is less or more than the premium received from writing the call or put option. Because increases in the market price of a call option generally reflect increases in the market price of the underlying security, any loss resulting from the repurchase of a call option is likely to be offset, in whole or in part, by appreciation of the underlying security owned by a Fund; however, a Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if it had not written the call option.
A Fund pays brokerage commissions or spreads in connection with purchasing or writing options, including those used to close out existing positions. From time to time, a Fund may purchase an underlying security for delivery in accordance with an exercise notice of a call option assigned to it, rather than delivering the security from its portfolio. In those cases, additional brokerage commissions are incurred.
The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying securities are traded. To the extent that the options markets close before the markets for the underlying securities, significant price and rate movements can take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund may use American-style options. The assets used as cover (or held in a segregated account) for OTC options written by a Fund will be considered illiquid unless the OTC options are sold to qualified dealers who agree that a Fund may repurchase any OTC option it writes at a maximum price to be calculated by a formula set forth in the option agreement. The cover for an OTC call option written subject to this procedure will be considered illiquid only to the extent that the maximum repurchase price under the formula exceeds the intrinsic value of the option.
Put and Call Options on Securities Indices
. Each Fund may purchase put and call options on securities indices and other financial indices to increase its exposure to the performance of a recognized securities index, such as the S&P 500 Index. In so doing, a Fund can pursue many of the same objectives it would pursue through the sale or purchase of options on individual securities or other instruments.
Unlike a securities option, which gives the holder the right to purchase or sell a specified security at a specified price, an option on a securities index gives the holder the right to receive a cash "exercise settlement amount" equal to (1) the difference between the exercise price of the option and the value of the underlying securities index on the exercise date (2) multiplied by a fixed "index multiplier." A securities index fluctuates with changes in the market values of the securities included in the index. Options on stock indices are currently traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX"), and other U.S. and foreign exchanges. The gain or loss on an option on an index depends on price movements in the instruments comprising the market, market segment, industry or other composite on which the underlying index is based, rather than price movements in individual securities, as is the case with respect to options on securities.
The effectiveness of hedging through the purchase of securities index options will depend upon the extent to which price movements in the securities being hedged correlate with price movements in the selected securities
index. Perfect correlation is not possible because the securities held or to be acquired by a Fund will not exactly match the composition of the securities indices on which options are available.
Securities index options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein.
Policies and Limitations
. For purposes of managing cash flow, a Fund may purchase put and call options on securities indices to increase a Fund's exposure to the performance of a recognized securities index, such as the S&P 500 Index. All securities index options purchased by a Fund will be listed and traded on an exchange.
Foreign Currency Transactions
. Each Fund may enter into contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific currency at a future date (usually less than one year from the date of the contract) at a fixed price ("forward contracts"). Each Fund also may engage in foreign currency exchange transactions on a spot (
i
.
e
., cash) basis at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency exchange market.
A Fund enters into forward contracts in an attempt to hedge against changes in prevailing currency exchange rates. A Fund does not engage in transactions in forward contracts for speculation; it views investments in forward contracts as a means of establishing more definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies. Forward contract transactions include forward sales or purchases of foreign currencies for the purpose of protecting the U.S. dollar value of securities held or to be acquired by a Fund or protecting the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other payments on those securities.
Forward contracts are traded in the interbank market directly between dealers (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A forward contract generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any stage for trades; foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference (the spread) between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies.
At the consummation of a forward contract to sell currency, a Fund may either make delivery of the foreign currency or terminate its contractual obligation to deliver by purchasing an offsetting contract. If a Fund chooses to make delivery of the foreign currency, it may be required to obtain such currency through the sale of portfolio securities denominated in such currency or through conversion of other assets of a Fund into such currency. If a Fund engages in an offsetting transaction, it will incur a gain or a loss to the extent that there has been a change in forward contract prices. Closing purchase transactions with respect to forward contracts are usually made with the currency dealer who is a party to the original forward contract.
NB Management believes that the use of foreign currency hedging techniques, including "proxy-hedges," can provide significant protection of NAV in the event of a general rise or decrease in the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. For example, the return available from securities denominated in a particular foreign currency would diminish if the value of the U.S. dollar increased against that currency. Such a decline could be partially or completely offset by an increase in value of a hedge involving a forward contract to sell that foreign currency or a proxy-hedge involving a forward contract to sell a different foreign currency whose behavior is expected to resemble the currency in which the securities being hedged are denominated but which is available on more advantageous terms.
However, a hedge or proxy-hedge cannot protect against exchange rate risks perfectly, and if NB Management is incorrect in its judgment of future exchange rate relationships, a Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if such a hedge had not been established. If a Fund uses proxy-hedging, it may experience losses on both the currency in which it has invested and the currency used for hedging if the two currencies do not vary with the expected degree of correlation. Using forward contracts to protect the value of a Fund's securities against a decline in the value of a currency does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of underlying securities. Because forward contracts are not traded on an exchange, the assets used to cover such contracts may be illiquid. A Fund may experience delays in the settlement of its foreign currency transactions.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund may enter into forward contracts for the purpose of hedging and not for speculation.
Options on Foreign Securities
. Each Fund may write and purchase covered call and put options on foreign currencies. Currency options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein. Certain options on foreign currencies are traded on the OTC market and involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in the case of exchange-traded currency options. Each Fund may use options on foreign currencies to protect against declines in the U.S. dollar value of portfolio securities or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired or to protect the dollar equivalent of dividends, interest or other payments on those securities.
Combined Transactions
. Each Fund may enter into multiple transactions including multiple options transactions, multiple interest transactions and any combination of options and interest rate transactions, instead of a single Financial Instrument as part of a single or combined strategy when, in the judgment of NB Management, it is in the best interests of a Fund to do so. A combined transaction will usually contain elements of risk that are present in each of its component transactions. Although combined transactions will normally be entered into by a Fund based on NB Management's judgment that the combined strategies will reduce risk or otherwise more effectively achieve the desired portfolio management goal, it is possible that the combination will instead increase the risks or hinder achievement of a Fund's management objective.
Cover for Financial Instruments
. Transactions using Financial Instruments, other than purchased options, expose a Fund to an obligation to another party. A Fund will not enter into any such transactions unless it owns either (1) an offsetting ("covering") position in securities, currencies or other options, futures contracts or forward contracts, or (2) cash and liquid assets held in a segregated account with a value, marked-to-market daily, sufficient to cover its potential obligations to the extent not covered as provided in (1) above. Each Fund will comply with SEC guidelines regarding cover for these instruments and will, if the guidelines so require, set aside cash or liquid assets in an account with its custodian in the prescribed amount as determined daily.
Securities held in a segregated account cannot be sold while the futures, options or forward strategy covered by those securities is outstanding, unless they are replaced with other suitable assets. As a result, segregation of a large percentage of a Fund's assets could impede Fund management or the Fund's ability to meet current obligations. A Fund may be unable promptly to dispose of assets that cover, or are segregated with respect to, an illiquid futures, options or forward position; this inability may result in a loss to a Fund.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund will comply with SEC guidelines regarding "cover" for Financial Instruments and, if the guidelines so require, set aside in a segregated account with its custodian the prescribed amount of cash or appropriate liquid securities.
General Risks of Financial Instruments
. The primary risks in using Financial Instruments are (1) imperfect correlation or no correlation between changes in market value of the securities or currencies held or to be acquired by a Fund and the prices of Financial Instruments; (2) possible lack of a liquid secondary market for Financial Instruments and the resulting inability to close out Financial Instruments when desired; (3) the fact that the skills needed to use Financial Instruments are different from those needed to select a Fund's securities; (4) the fact that, although use of Financial Instruments for hedging purposes can reduce the risk of loss, they also can reduce the opportunity for gain, or even result in losses, by offsetting favorable price movements in hedged investments; and (5) the possible inability of a Fund to purchase or sell a portfolio security at a time that would otherwise be favorable for it to do so, or the possible need for a Fund to sell a portfolio security at a disadvantageous time, due to its need to maintain cover or to segregate securities in connection with its use of Financial Instruments. There can be no assurance that a Fund's use of Financial Instruments will be successful.
A Fund's use of Financial Instruments may be limited by the provisions of the Code with which it must comply if it is to qualify for treatment as a RIC. See "Tax Matters." Financial Instruments may not be available with respect to some currencies, especially those of so-called emerging market countries.
Policies and Limitations
. NB Management intends to reduce the risk of imperfect correlation by investing only in Financial Instruments whose behavior is expected to resemble or offset that of a Fund's underlying securities or currency. NB Management intends to reduce the risk that a Fund will be unable to close out Financial Instruments by entering into such transactions only if NB Management believes there will be an active and liquid secondary market.
Regulatory Limitations on Using Financial Instruments
. To the extent a Fund sells or purchases futures contracts or writes options thereon or options on foreign currencies that are traded on an exchange regulated by the CFTC other than for
bona
fide
hedging purposes (as defined by the CFTC), the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish those positions (excluding the amount by which options are "in-the-money") may not exceed 5% of a Fund's net assets.
Accounting Considerations for Financial Instruments
. When a Fund writes an option, an amount equal to the premium it receives is included in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked to market to reflect the current market value of the option written. When a Fund purchases an option, the premium a Fund pays is recorded as an asset in that statement and is subsequently adjusted to the current market value of the option.
In the case of a regulated futures contract a Fund purchases or sells, an amount equal to the initial margin deposit is recorded as an asset in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The amount of the asset is subsequently adjusted to reflect changes in the amount of the deposit as well as changes in the value of the contract.
Borrowing and Leverage
. Each Fund is authorized to borrow amounts up to 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) minus liabilities (other than the amount borrowed). The use of borrowed funds involves the speculative factor known as "leverage." NHS and NOX have used, and New NHS intends to use, leverage for investment purposes by issuing Preferred Stock and Notes. The issuance of Preferred Stock would permit a Fund to assume leverage in an amount up to 50% of its total assets (taking into account the effect of any outstanding Notes). The issuance of Notes would permit a Fund to assume leverage in an amount up to 33 1/3% of its total assets. Preferred Stock and Notes would have a priority on the income and assets of a Fund over the Common Stock and would have certain other rights with respect to voting and the election of Directors. In certain circumstances, the net asset value of and dividends payable on Common Stock could be adversely affected by such preferences. Each Fund's leveraged capital structure creates special risks not associated with unleveraged funds having similar investment objectives and policies. Each Fund will utilize leverage only when there is an expectation that it will benefit the Fund. To the extent the income or other gain derived from securities purchased with the proceeds of borrowings or preferred stock issuances exceeds the interest or dividends a Fund would have to pay thereon, the Fund's net income or other gain would be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income or other gain from the securities purchased through leverage is not sufficient to cover the cost of such leverage, a Fund's total return would be less than if leverage had not been used. If leverage is used, in certain circumstances, a Fund could be required to liquidate securities it would not otherwise sell in order to satisfy dividend or interest obligations. Each Fund may also borrow up to an additional 5% of its total assets for temporary purposes without regard to the foregoing limitations. See "Investment Objectives, Policies and Limitations." This could include, for example, borrowing on a short-term basis in order to facilitate the settlement of portfolio securities transactions.
When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions
. Each Fund may purchase securities on a "when-issued" and "delayed delivery" basis. No income accrues to a Fund on securities in connection with such transactions prior to the date it actually takes delivery of such securities. These transactions are subject to market fluctuation; the value of the securities at delivery may be more or less than their purchase price, and yields generally available on securities when delivery occurs may be higher than yields on the securities obtained pursuant to such transactions. These transactions involve a commitment by a Fund to purchase securities that will be issued at a future date (ordinarily within two months, although a Fund may agree to a longer settlement period). The price of the underlying securities (usually expressed in terms of yield) and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for (the settlement date) are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. When-issued purchases are negotiated directly with the other party, and such commitments are not traded on exchanges.
When-issued and delayed delivery transactions enable a Fund to "lock in" what NB Management believes to be an attractive price or yield on a particular security for a period of time, regardless of future changes in interest rates. In periods of falling interest rates and rising prices, a Fund might purchase a security on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis and sell a similar security to settle such purchase, thereby obtaining the benefit of currently higher yields. If the seller fails to complete the sale, a Fund may lose the opportunity to obtain a favorable price.
The value of securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis and any subsequent fluctuations in their value are reflected in the computation of a Fund's NAV starting on the date of the agreement to purchase the securities. Because the Fund has not yet paid for the securities, this produces an effect similar to leverage. A significant percentage of a Fund's assets committed to the purchase of securities on a "when-issued" or "delayed delivery" basis may increase the volatility of its net asset value and may limit the flexibility to manage its investments. A Fund does not earn interest on securities it has committed to purchase until the securities are paid for and delivered on the settlement date.
Policies and Limitations
. Each Fund will purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis only with the intention of completing the transaction and actually taking delivery of the securities. If deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy, however, a Fund may dispose of or renegotiate a commitment after it has been entered into. A Fund also may sell securities it has committed to purchase before those securities are delivered to the Fund on the settlement date. A Fund may realize capital gains or losses in connection with these transactions.
When a Fund purchases securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, it will deposit in a segregated account with its custodian, until payment is made, appropriate liquid securities having an aggregate market value determined daily) at least equal to the amount of the Fund's purchase commitments. This procedure is designed to ensure that a Fund maintains sufficient assets at all times to cover its obligations under when-issued and delayed delivery purchases. Subject to the requirement of maintaining a segregated account, no specified limitation exists as to the percentage of a Fund's assets that may be used to acquire securities on a "when-issued" or "delayed delivery" basis.
Structured Notes and Other Hybrid Instruments
. Each Fund may invest in "structured" notes, which are privately negotiated debt obligations where the principal and/or interest is determined by reference to the performance of a benchmark asset, market or interest rate, such as selected securities, an index of securities or specified interest rates, or the differential performance of two assets or markets, such as indices reflecting taxable and tax-exempt bonds. Depending on the terms of the note, a Fund may forgo all or part of the interest and principal that would be payable on a comparable conventional note. The rate of return on structured notes may be determined by applying a multiplier to the performance or differential performance of the referenced index(es) or other asset(s). Application of a multiplier involves leverage that will serve to magnify the potential for gain and the risk of loss. Each Fund currently intends that any use of structured notes will be for the purpose of reducing the interest rate sensitivity of its portfolio (and, thereby, decreasing its exposure to interest rate risk. Like other sophisticated strategies, a Fund's use of structured notes may not work as intended; for example, the change in the value of the structured notes may not match very closely the change in the value of bonds that the structured notes were purchased to hedge.
Each Fund may invest in other types of "hybrid" instruments that combine the characteristics of securities, futures, and options. For example, the principal amount or interest rate of a hybrid could be tied (positively or negatively) to the price of some securities index or another interest rate (each a "benchmark"). The interest rate or (unlike most debt obligations) the principal amount payable at maturity of a hybrid security may be increased or decreased, depending on changes in the value of the benchmark. Hybrids can be used as an efficient means of pursuing a variety of investment goals, including duration management and increased total return. Hybrids may not bear interest or pay dividends. The value of a hybrid or its interest rate may be a multiple of a benchmark and, as a result, may be leveraged and move (up or down) more steeply and rapidly than the benchmark. These benchmarks may be sensitive to economic and political events that cannot be readily foreseen by the purchaser of a hybrid. Under certain conditions, the redemption value of a hybrid could be zero. Thus, an investment in a hybrid may entail significant market risks that are not associated with a similar investment in a traditional, U.S. dollar-denominated bond that has a fixed principal amount and pays a fixed rate or floating rate of interest. The purchase of hybrids also exposes a Fund to the credit risk of the issuer of the hybrids. These risks may cause significant fluctuations in the net asset value of a Fund.
Certain issuers of structured products, such as hybrid instruments, may be deemed to be "investment companies" as defined in the 1940 Act. As a result, a Fund's investments in these products may be subject to limits applicable to investments in investment companies and may be subject to restrictions contained in the 1940 Act. See "Securities of Other Investment Companies."
Risks of Equity Securities
.
Equity securities in which a Fund may invest include common stocks, preferred stocks, convertible securities and warrants. Common stocks and preferred stocks represent shares of ownership in a corporation. Preferred stocks usually have specific dividends and rank after bonds and before common stock in claims on assets of the corporation should it be dissolved. Increases and decreases in earnings are usually reflected in a corporation's stock price. Convertible securities are debt or preferred equity securities convertible into common stock. Usually, convertible securities pay dividends or interest at rates higher than common stock, but lower than other securities. Convertible securities usually participate to some extent in the appreciation or depreciation of the underlying stock into which they are convertible. Warrants are options to buy a stated number of shares of common stock at a specified price anytime during the life of the warrants.
To the extent a Fund invests in such securities, the value of securities held by the Fund will be affected by changes in the stock markets, which may be the result of domestic or international political or economic news, changes in interest rates or changing investor sentiment. At times, the stock markets can be volatile and stock prices can change substantially. The equity securities of smaller companies are more sensitive to these changes than those of larger companies. This market risk will affect a Fund's NAV per share, which will fluctuate as the value of the securities held by the Fund change. Not all stock prices change uniformly or at the same time and not all stock markets move in the same direction at the same time. Other factors affect a particular stock's prices, such as poor earnings reports by an issuer, loss of major customers, major litigation against an issuer, or changes in governmental regulations affecting an industry. Adverse news affecting one company can sometimes depress the stock prices of all companies in the same industry. Not all factors can be predicted.
Terrorism Risks
. Some of the U.S. securities markets were closed for a four-day period as a result of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001. These terrorist attacks, the war with Iraq and its aftermath, continuing occupation of Iraq by coalition forces and related events have led to increased short-term market volatility and may have long-term effects on United States and world economies and markets. Those events could also have an acute effect on individual issuers or related groups of issuers or issuers concentrated in a single geographic area. A similar disruption of the financial markets or other terrorist attacks could adversely impact interest rates, auctions, secondary trading, ratings, credit risk, inflation and other factors relating to portfolio securities and adversely affect Fund service providers and a Fund’s operations.
Recent Market Events
.
Recent events in the financial sector have resulted in an unusually high degree of volatility in the financial markets and the economy at large. Both domestic and international equity and fixed income markets have been experiencing heightened volatility and turmoil, with issuers that have exposure to the real estate, mortgage and credit markets particularly affected. It is uncertain how long these conditions will continue.
These recent market conditions have resulted in fixed income instruments experiencing unusual liquidity issues, increased price volatility and, in some cases, credit downgrades and increased likelihood of default. These events have reduced the willingness and ability of some lenders to extend credit, and have made it more difficult for borrowers to obtain financing on attractive terms, if at all. As a result, the values of many types of securities have been reduced, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed, asset-backed and corporate debt securities. During times of market turmoil, investors tend to look to the safety of securities issued or backed by the U.S. Treasury, causing the prices of these securities to rise and the yield to decline.
Mortgage-backed securities have been especially affected by these recent market events. Throughout 2008, the market for mortgage-related securities experienced substantially, often dramatically, lower valuations and greatly reduced liquidity. Markets for other asset-backed securities have also been affected. In the mortgage sector, there have been rising delinquency rates. These defaults have caused unexpected losses for loan originators and certain lenders. Traditional market participants have been less willing to make a market in some types of debt instruments, which has affected the liquidity of those instruments. Illiquid investments may be harder to value, especially in changing markets. These risks may be heightened in the case of sub-prime mortgage-backed securities.
Some financial institutions and other enterprises may have large (but still undisclosed) exposure to certain types of securities, such as mortgage-backed securities, which could have a negative effect on the broader economy. Events in the financial markets and the broader economy are also eroding the tax bases of many state and local
governments, as well as their access to the credit markets. This has put downward pressure on the value of many municipal securities. Some traditional insurers of municipal securities have also experienced financial stress.
The U.S. federal government and certain foreign governments have acted to calm credit markets and increase confidence in the U.S. and world economies. The U.S. government is injecting liquidity into certain large financial services companies and establishing programs to assist in the purchase of money market instruments. The ultimate effect of these efforts is, of course, not yet known.
The situation in the financial markets has resulted in calls for increased regulation, and the need of many financial institutions for government help has given regulators new leverage. Federal, state, and other governments, their regulatory agencies, or self regulatory organizations may take actions that affect the instruments in which the Funds invest, or the issuers of such instruments, in ways that are unforeseeable. In particular, there is pressure for legislation to modify the terms of home mortgages and regulate the issuance of mortgage-backed securities in ways that could limit the ability of investors in those securities, such as the Funds, to realize their full value.
Because the situation in the markets is widespread and largely unprecedented, it may be unusually difficult to identify both risks and opportunities using past models of the interplay of market forces, or to predict the duration of these market events.
PORTFOLIO TRADING AND TURNOVER RATE
A Fund cannot accurately predict its turnover rate but anticipates that its annual turnover rate will not exceed 50%. A Fund’s turnover rate is calculated by dividing (1) the lesser of the cost of the securities purchased or the proceeds from the securities sold by the Fund during the fiscal year (other than securities, including options, whose maturity or expiration date at the time of acquisition was one year or less) by (2) the month-end average of the value of such securities owned by the Fund during the fiscal year. A Fund generally will not engage in the trading of securities for the purpose of realizing short-term profits, but it will adjust its portfolio as it deems advisable in view of prevailing or anticipated market conditions to accomplish its investment objectives. For example, a Fund may sell portfolio securities in anticipation of a movement in interest rates. Higher turnover rates can result in corresponding increases in a Fund’s transaction costs, which must be borne by the Fund and its stockholders. High portfolio turnover may also result in the realization of substantial net short-term capital gains, and any distributions attributable to those gains will be taxable to stockholders at ordinary income rates for federal income tax purposes. Other than for consideration of tax consequences, frequency of portfolio turnover will not be a limiting factor if a Fund considers it advantageous to purchase or sell securities.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS
For additional discussion regarding management of the Funds see “Proposal 2 – Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
Directors and Officers
The respective Boards of Trustees/Directors of New NHS, NHS and NOX (each, a “Board”) are broadly responsible for overseeing the management of the business and affairs of each Fund, including general supervision of the duties performed by NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger. Subject to the provisions of New NHS’s and NOX’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles”), their Bylaws and Maryland law, and NHS’s Declaration of Trust, Bylaws and Delaware law, each Board has all powers necessary and convenient to carry out this responsibility, including the election and removal of each Fund’s officers. Among other things, each Board generally oversees the portfolio management of each Fund and reviews and approves the Fund’s management and sub-advisory agreements and other principal agreements. It is each Fund’s policy that at least three quarters of its Board of Trustees/Directors shall be comprised of Fund Trustees/Directors who are not “interested persons” of NB Management (including its affiliates) or the Fund (“Independent Fund Directors”).
The Directors of New NHS are identical to those of NHS and NOX. For a table reflecting information concerning the Trustees/Directors and officers of each Fund, see “Information Regarding Nominees For Election” in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
Committees
The standing committees that oversee particular aspects of the management of NHS and NOX are identical to those of New NHS. For more information regarding the standing committees of each Fund, see “Board of Directors and Committee Meetings” in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
For information regarding the compensation of the Funds’ Directors, see the section entitled “Compensation of Directors” in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2009, Directors of New NHS did not receive any compensation from the Fund because it was not yet organized as a registered investment company.
Ownership of Securities
For information regarding the ownership of securities by each Director/Trustee of NHS and NOX, respectively, as of December 31, 2009 see “Ownership of Securities” in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2009, Directors of New NHS did not invest in the Fund’s securities because it was not yet organized as a registered investment company.
Codes of Ethics
The Funds, NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger have personal securities trading policies that restrict the personal securities transactions of employees, officers, and Fund Directors. Their primary purpose is to ensure that personal trading by these individuals does not disadvantage any fund managed by NB Management. The Portfolio Managers and other investment personnel who comply with the policies’ pre-clearance and disclosure procedures may be permitted to purchase, sell or hold certain types of securities which also may be or are held in the funds they advise, but are restricted from trading in close conjunction with their Funds or taking personal advantage of investment opportunities that may belong to the Funds. Text-only versions of the Codes of Ethics can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s internet web site at www.sec.gov. You may also review and copy those documents by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 202-942-8090. In addition, copies of the Codes of Ethics may be obtained, after mailing the appropriate duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549-0102 or by e-mail request at publicinfo@sec.gov.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
Investment Manager and Administrator
NB Management serves as the investment manager to each Fund pursuant to management agreements with NHS and NOX, dated as of May 4, 2009, and with New NHS pursuant to an agreement dated as of [ , 2010] (“Management Agreement”). NB Management also provides investment management and advisory services to private accounts of institutional and individual clients and to mutual funds.
Each Management Agreement provides, in substance, that NB Management will make and implement investment decisions for each Fund in its discretion and will continuously develop an investment program for each Fund’s assets. Each Management Agreement permits NB Management to effect securities transactions on behalf of each Fund through associated persons of NB Management. Each Management Agreement also specifically permits NB Management to compensate, through higher commissions, brokers and dealers who provide investment research and analysis to the Funds, although NB Management has no current plans to pay a material amount of such compensation.
NB Management provides to each Fund, without separate cost, office space, equipment, and facilities and the personnel necessary to perform executive, administrative, and clerical functions. NB Management pays all
salaries, expenses, and fees of the Fund Directors, officers and employees of the Funds who are officers, directors, or employees of NB Management. Three officers of NB Management, presently serve as officers of the Funds. See “Directors and Officers.” Each of these Funds pays NB Management a management fee based on the Fund’s average daily net assets, as described herein.
Pursuant to each respective Management Agreement, each Fund has agreed to pay NB Management an annual management fee, payable on a monthly basis, at the annual rate of 0.60% of the Fund’s average daily total assets (including the assets attributable to the proceeds from any financial leverage) minus liabilities (other than aggregate indebtedness entered into for purposes of leverage) (the “Managed Assets”). The liquidation preference of Preferred Shares of NOX is not considered a liability or permanent equity.
NB Management provides facilities, services, and personnel to the Funds pursuant to an administration agreement with NHS and NOX, dated as of May 4, 2009, and with New NHS dated as of [ , 2010]] (“Administration Agreement”). Under the Administration Agreement, NB Management also provides certain stockholder, stockholder-related, and other services that are not furnished by a Fund’s stockholder servicing agent. NB Management provides the direct stockholder services specified in the Administration Agreement and assists the stockholder servicing agent in the development and implementation of specified programs and systems to enhance overall stockholder servicing capabilities. NB Management solicits and gathers stockholder proxies, performs services connected with a Fund’s exchange listing, and furnishes other services the parties agree from time to time should be provided under the Administration Agreement.
For administrative services, NHS, NOX and New NHS pay NB Management at the annual rate of 0.05%, 0.25% and 0.05% respectively, of average daily Managed Assets. With a Fund’s consent, NB Management may subcontract to third parties some of its responsibilities to the Fund under the administration agreement. In addition, a Fund may compensate such third parties for accounting and other services.
All fees and expenses are accrued daily and deducted before payment of dividends to investors.
Contractual Fee Waivers
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 for NHS, and October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 for NOX, each Fund accrued management and administration fees as follows:
|
Management and Administration Fees
Accrued for Fiscal Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
NHS
|
$[ ]
|
$[ ]
|
$[ ]
|
|
|
Management and Administration Fees
Accrued for Fiscal Years
Ended October 31,
|
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
NOX
|
$[ ]
|
$[ ]
|
$[ ]
|
|
NB Management has contractually agreed to waive a portion of the management fee it is entitled to receive from NOX in the amounts, and for the time periods, set forth below:
|
NOX
|
Fiscal Period
Ending October 31,
|
Percentage Waived of the Fund’s average daily Managed Assets
|
2009
|
0.19%
|
2010
|
0.13%
|
2011
|
0.07%
|
NB Management has not contractually agreed to waive any portion of its fees beyond October 31, 2011.
NB Management waived the following amount of management fees pursuant to NOX’s contractual arrangement:
|
Management Fees Waived for Fiscal Years
Ended October 31,
|
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
NOX
|
$[ ]
|
$[ ]
|
$[ ]
|
The Management Agreement continues until October 31, 2010 for NHS and NOX, and until [ ] for New NHS, and is renewable from year to year thereafter with respect to a Fund, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Fund Directors who are Independent Fund Directors, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Fund Directors or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding stock in the Fund. The Administration Agreement continues for a period of two years after the date the Fund became subject thereto. The Administration Agreement is renewable from year to year, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Fund Directors or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding stock in the Fund.
The Management Agreement is terminable, without penalty, on 60 days’ written notice either by a Fund or by NB Management. The Administration Agreement is terminable, without penalty, on 60 days’ written notice either by NB Management or by a Fund. Each Agreement terminates automatically if it is assigned.
Except as otherwise described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, a Fund pays, in addition to the investment management fee described above, all expenses not assumed by NB Management, including, without limitation, fees and expenses of Directors who are not “interested persons” of NB Management or the Fund, interest charges, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of issue of shares, fees and expenses of registering and qualifying the Fund and its classes of shares for distribution under federal and state laws and regulations, charges of custodians, auditing and legal expenses, expenses of determining NAV of the Fund, reports to stockholders, expenses of meetings of stockholders, expenses of printing and mailing prospectuses, proxy statements and proxies to existing stockholders, and its proportionate share of insurance premiums and professional association dues or assessments. A Fund is also responsible for such nonrecurring expenses as may arise, including litigation in which the Fund may be a party, and other expenses as determined by the Board. A Fund may have an obligation to indemnify its officers and Directors with respect to such litigation.
Voluntary Fee Waivers
For New NHS, Management has agreed to voluntarily
waive a portion of the management fee it is entitled to receive from the Fund at a rate of [ ]% of the average daily Managed Assets through July 1, 2012.
Effective June 9, 2009, NB Management has agreed to voluntarily waive a portion of the management fee it is entitled to receive from NHS at a rate of 0.05% of the average daily Managed Assets. For the year ended December 31, 2009, such waived fees amounted to $52,002.
Management has agreed to voluntarily extend for one year the contractual fee waivers currently in place for NOX, so that the contractual and voluntary fee waivers together as a percentage of average daily Managed Assets would be:
|
Percentage Waived of the Fund’s average daily Managed Assets,
Fiscal Period Ending October 31,
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
NOX
|
0.07%
|
0.13%
|
0.19%
|
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, such waived fees amounted to $252,874 for NOX.
Sub-Adviser
NB Management retains NBFI, 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60601, as sub-adviser with respect to NHS and NOX pursuant to sub-advisory agreements dated as of May 4, 2009 and with respect to New NHS pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement dated as of [ ], 2010; NOX also retains Neuberger as sub-adviser pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement dated May 4, 2009 (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”).
The Sub-Advisory Agreements for NOX and NHS continues until October 31, 2010 and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for New NHS continues until [ ], 2012; each is renewable from year to year thereafter, subject to approval of its continuance in the same manner as the Management Agreements. The Sub-Advisory Agreements are subject to termination, without penalty, with respect to a Fund by the Directors/Trustees or a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding stock of a Fund, by NB Management, or by NBFI, and Neuberger for NOX, on not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior written notice. Each Sub-Advisory Agreement also terminates automatically with respect to the applicable Fund if it is assigned or if the Management Agreement terminates with respect to the Fund. NBFI, and Neuberger for NOX, and NB Management employ experienced professionals that work in a competitive environment.
The Sub-Advisory Agreement for New NHS will provide, and the Sub-Advisory Agreement for NHS provides, in substance that NBFI will
make and implement investment decisions for each Fund in its discretion and will continuously develop an investment program for each Fund’s assets. The Sub-advisory Agreements permit NBFI to effect securities transactions on behalf of the Funds through associated persons of NBFI. The Sub-Advisory Agreements also specifically permit NBFI to compensate, through higher commissions, brokers and dealers who provide investment research and analysis to the Fund, although NB Fixed Income has no current plans to pay a material amount of such compensation.
The Sub-Advisory Agreements for NOX provide in substance that NBFI and Neuberger, respectively, will furnish to NB Management, upon reasonable request, the same type of investment recommendations and research that NBFI and Neuberger, respectively, from time to time, provides to its officers and employees for use in managing client accounts. In this manner, NB Management expects to have available to it, in addition to research from other professional sources, the capability of the research staff of NBFI and Neuberger, respectively. This staff consists of numerous investment analysts, each of whom specializes in studying one or more industries, under the supervision of the Director of Research, who is also available for consultation with NB Management. Each Sub-Advisory Agreement provides that NB Management will pay for the services rendered by each of NBFI and Neuberger, respectively, based on the direct and indirect costs to NBFI and Neuberger in connection with those services. NBFI and Neuberger also serve as sub-advisers for other investment companies managed by NB Management.
Each Sub-Advisory Agreement provides that NBFI, and Neuberger for NOX, shall not be subject to any liability in connection with the performance of its services thereunder in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties.
Management and Control of NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger
NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger are wholly owned by Neuberger Berman Group LLC. The Directors/Trustees, officers and/or employees of NB Management and Neuberger who are deemed “control persons,” all of whom have offices at the same address as NB Management, are: Kevin Handwerker, Joseph Amato, and Robert Conti. Mr. Conti and Mr. Amato are Directors and officers of the Funds. The directors, officers and/or employees of NBFI who are deemed “control persons,” all of whom have offices at the same address as NBFI, are: Andrew Johnson and Bradley C. Tank.
Prior to May 4, 2009, the predecessors of NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger were wholly owned subsidiaries of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman Brothers”), a publicly owned holding company. On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On December 3, 2008, NBSH Acquisition, LLC (“NBSH”), an entity organized by key members of Neuberger Berman’s senior management, was selected as the successful bidder in the public auction to acquire a majority interest in Neuberger Berman’s business and the fixed income and certain alternative asset management businesses of Lehman Brothers’ Investment Management Division (together with Neuberger Berman, the “Acquired Businesses”) (the “Acquisition”). On December 22, 2008, the bankruptcy court having jurisdiction over the Lehman Brothers matter approved the sale of the Acquired Businesses to NBSH (or its successor or assign), as the successful bidder.
The Acquisition closed on May 4, 2009, and the Acquired Businesses are now indirectly owned by, among others, portfolio managers, Neuberger Berman’s management team, and certain key members and senior professionals who are employed throughout the Neuberger Berman complex of companies, with a minority interest retained by Lehman Brothers and certain affiliates of Lehman Brothers.
These events have not had a material impact on the Funds or their operations. NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger continue to operate in the ordinary course of business as the investment manager and sub-advisers of the Funds.
Portfolio Manager Information
Accounts Managed
Ann H. Benjamin and Thomas P. O’Reilly serve as Portfolio Manager of each Fund. The table below describes the accounts for which Ms. Benjamin and Mr. O’Reilly have day-to-day management responsibility as of December 31, 2009.
Type of Account
|
Number of Accounts Managed
|
Total Assets Managed
($ millions)
|
Number of Accounts Managed for which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
|
Assets Managed for which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ann H. Benjamin
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
4
|
$1,345
|
–
|
–
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
–
|
–
|
Other Accounts**
|
31
|
$5,422
|
–
|
–
|
Thomas P. O’Reilly
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
4
|
$1,345
|
–
|
–
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
–
|
–
|
Other Accounts**
|
31
|
$5,422
|
–
|
–
|
* Registered Investment Companies include all mutual funds managed by the Portfolio Manager, including the Funds.
** Other Accounts include: Institutional Separate Accounts, Sub-Advised Accounts, and Managed Accounts (WRAP).
Conflicts of Interest
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a Portfolio Manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one Fund or other account. The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to actual or potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different or similar objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees, as the Portfolio Manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. The Portfolio Manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by a Fund, and which may include transactions that are directly contrary to the positions taken by a Fund. For example, a Portfolio Manager may engage in short sales of securities for another account that are the same type of securities in which a Fund it manages also invests. In such as case, the Portfolio Manager could be seen as harming the performance of the Fund for the benefit of the account engaging in short sales if the short sales cause the market value of the securities to fall. Additionally, if a Portfolio Manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than one fund or other account, a Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity. If one account were to buy or sell portfolio securities shortly before another account bought or sold the same securities, it could affect the price paid or received by the second account. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than a Fund may outperform the securities selected for the Fund. Finally, a conflict of interest may arise if NB Management and a Portfolio Manager have a financial incentive to favor one account over another, such as a performance-based management fee that applies to one account but not all Funds or accounts for which the Portfolio Manager is responsible.
NB Management, NBFI, Neuberger and each Fund have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
Compensation of Portfolio Managers by NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger
Our compensation philosophy is one that focuses on rewarding performance and incentivizing our employees. We are also focused on creating a compensation process that we believe is fair, transparent, and competitive with the market.
Compensation for Portfolio Managers consists of fixed and variable compensation but is more heavily weighted on the variable portion of total compensation and reflects individual performance, overall contribution to the team, collaboration with colleagues across Neuberger Berman and, most importantly, overall investment performance. In particular, the bonus for a Portfolio Manager is determined by using a formula and may or may not contain a discretionary component. If applicable, the discretionary component is determined on the basis of a variety of criteria, including investment performance (including the pre-tax
three-year track record in order to emphasize long-term performance), utilization of central resources (including research, sales and operations/support), business building to further the longer term sustainable success of the investment team, effective team/people management, and overall contribution to the success of Neuberger Berman. In addition, compensation of portfolio managers at other comparable firms is considered, with an eye toward remaining competitive with the market.
The terms of our long-term retention incentives are as follows:
Employee-Owned Equity.
An integral part of the Acquisition (the management buyout of Neuberger Berman in 2009) was implementing an equity ownership structure which embodies the importance of incentivizing and retaining key investment professionals.
The senior Portfolio Managers on the mutual fund teams are key shareholders in the equity ownership structure. On a yearly basis over the next five years, the equity ownership allocations will be re-evaluated and re-
allocated based on performance and other key metrics. A set percentage of employee equity and preferred stock is subject to vesting.
Contingent Compensation Plan.
We have also established the Neuberger Berman Group Contingent Compensation Plan pursuant to which a certain percentage of a Portfolio Manager’s compensation is deemed contingent and vests over a three-year period. Under the plan, participating Portfolio Managers and other participating employees who are members of mutual fund investment teams will receive a cash return on their contingent compensation with a portion of such return being determined based on the team’s investment performance, as well as the performance of a portfolio of other investment funds managed by Neuberger Berman Group investment professionals.
Restrictive Covenants.
Portfolio Managers who have received equity interests have agreed to certain restrictive covenants, which impose obligations and restrictions on the use of confidential information and the solicitation of Neuberger Berman employees and clients over a specified period of time if the Portfolio Manager leaves the firm.
Other Accounts.
Certain Portfolio Managers may manage products other than mutual funds, such as high net worth separate accounts. For the management of these accounts, a Portfolio Manager may generally receive a percentage of pre-tax revenue determined on a monthly basis less certain deductions (e.g., a “finder’s fee” or “referral fee” paid to a third party). The percentage of revenue a Portfolio Manager receives will vary based on certain revenue thresholds.
Ownership of Securities
Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by the Portfolio Manager, as of December 31, 2009, in each Fund.
Portfolio Manager
|
Fund(s) Managed*
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Owned in the Fund
|
Ann H. Benjamin
|
Neuberger Berman
High Yield Strategies Fund
|
[ ]
|
|
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.*
|
A
|
|
Neuberger Berman Income Opportunity Fund Inc.
|
[ ]
|
Thomas P. O’Reilly
|
Neuberger Berman
High Yield Strategies Fund
|
[ ]
|
|
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.*
|
A
|
|
Neuberger Berman Income Opportunity Fund Inc.
|
[ ]
|
* As of the date of this statement of additional information, New NHS had not yet commenced operations.
A = None
|
E = $100,001-$500,000
|
|
|
B = $1-$10,000
|
F = $500,001-$1,000,000
|
|
|
C = $10,001 - $50,000
|
G = Over $1,000,001
|
|
|
D =$50,001-$100,000
|
|
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Investment Decisions and Portfolio Transactions
The investment decisions concerning the Funds and the other registered investment companies managed by NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger (collectively, “Other NB Funds”) have been and will continue to be made independently of one another. In terms of their investment objectives, most of the Other NB Funds differ from the
Funds. Even where the investment objectives are similar, however, the methods used by the Other NB Funds and the Funds to achieve their objectives may differ. The investment results achieved by all of the registered investment companies managed by NB Management, NBFI and Neuberger have varied from one another in the past and are likely to vary in the future.
There may be occasions when a Fund and one or more of the Other NB Funds or other accounts managed by NB Management, NBFI or Neuberger are contemporaneously engaged in purchasing or selling the same securities from or to third parties. When this occurs, the transactions are averaged as to price and allocated, in terms of amount, in accordance with a formula considered to be equitable to the funds involved. Although in some cases this arrangement may have a detrimental effect on the price or volume of the securities as to a Fund, in other cases it is believed that a Fund’s ability to participate in volume transactions may produce better executions for it. In any case, it is the judgment of Fund Directors/Trustees that the desirability of the Funds’ having their advisory arrangements with NB Management, NBFI or Neuberger outweighs any disadvantages that may result from contemporaneous transactions.
The Funds are subject to certain limitations imposed on all advisory clients of NB Management, NBFI or Neuberger (including the Funds, the Other NB Funds, and other managed accounts) and personnel of NB Management, NBFI or Neuberger and their affiliates. These include, for example, limits that may be imposed in certain industries or by certain companies, and policies of NB Management, NBFI or Neuberger that limit the aggregate purchases, by all accounts under management, of the outstanding shares of public companies.
Each Fund may, from time to time, loan portfolio securities to Neuberger and to other affiliated broker-dealers (“Affiliated Borrowers”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of an order issued by the SEC. The order exempts such transactions from the provisions of the 1940 Act that would otherwise prohibit these transactions, subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the order, securities loans made by the Funds to Affiliated Borrowers are fully secured by cash collateral. Each loan to an Affiliated Borrower by the Funds will be made on terms at least as favorable to the Funds as comparable loans to unaffiliated borrowers, and no loans will be made to an Affiliated Borrower unless the Affiliated Borrower represents that the terms are at least as favorable to the Funds as those it provides to unaffiliated lenders in comparable transactions. All affiliated loans will be made with spreads that are not lower than those provided for in a schedule of spreads established by the Independent Directors. The schedule of spreads will set the lowest spread that can apply with respect to a loan and will permit the spread for each individual loan to be adjusted to cover costs and realize net income for the Funds. All transactions with Affiliated Borrowers will be reviewed periodically by officers of the Fund and reported to the Board of Directors.
Proxy Voting
Each Board has delegated to NB Management the responsibility to vote proxies related to the securities held in a Fund’s portfolio. Under this authority, NB Management is required by each Board to vote proxies related to portfolio securities in the best interests of a Fund and its stockholders. Each Board permits NB Management to contract with a third party to obtain proxy voting and related services, including research of current issues.
NB Management has implemented written Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Proxy Voting Policy”) that are designed to reasonably ensure that NB Management votes proxies prudently and in the best interest of its advisory clients for whom NB Management has voting authority, including the Funds. The Proxy Voting Policy also describes how NB Management addresses any conflicts that may arise between its interests and those of its clients with respect to proxy voting.
NB Management’s Proxy Committee is responsible for developing, authorizing, implementing and updating the Proxy Voting Policy, overseeing the proxy voting process and engaging and overseeing any independent third-party vendors as voting delegate to review, monitor and/or vote proxies. In order to apply the Proxy Voting Policy noted above in a timely and consistent manner, NB Management utilizes Glass, Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) to vote proxies in accordance with NB Management’s voting guidelines.
NB Management’s guidelines adopt the voting recommendations of Glass Lewis. NB Management retains final authority and fiduciary responsibility for proxy voting. NB Management believes that this process is
reasonably designed to address material conflicts of interest that may arise between NB Management and a client as to how proxies are voted.
In the event that an investment professional at NB Management believes that it is in the best interests of a client or clients to vote proxies in a manner inconsistent with NB Management’s proxy voting guidelines or in a manner inconsistent with Glass Lewis recommendations, the Proxy Committee will review information submitted by the investment professional to determine that there is no material conflict of interest between NB Management and the client with respect to the voting of the proxy in that manner.
If the Proxy Committee determines that the voting of a proxy as recommended by the investment professional presents a material conflict of interest between NB Management and the client or clients with respect to the voting of the proxy, the Proxy Committee shall: (i) take no further action, in which case Glass Lewis shall vote such proxy in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines or as Glass Lewis recommends; (ii) disclose such conflict to the client or clients and obtain written direction from the client as to how to vote the proxy; (iii) suggest that the client or clients engage another party to determine how to vote the proxy; or (iv) engage another independent third party to determine how to vote the proxy.
Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available, without charge, by calling 1-877-461-1899 (toll-free) or visiting www.nb.com or the website of the SEC,
www.sec.gov
.
Brokerage and Research Services
Purchases and sales of portfolio securities generally are transacted with issuers, underwriters, or dealers that serve as primary market-makers, who act as principals for the securities on a net basis. The Funds typically do not pay brokerage commissions for such purchases and sales. Instead, the price paid for newly issued securities usually includes a concession or discount paid by the issuer to the underwriter, and the prices quoted by market-makers reflect a spread between the bid and the asked prices from which the dealer derives a profit.
In purchasing and selling portfolio securities other than as described above (for example, in the secondary market), each Fund seeks to obtain best execution at the most favorable prices through responsible broker-dealers and, in the case of agency transactions, at competitive commission rates. In selecting broker-dealers to execute transactions, the Manager considers such factors as the price of the security, the rate of commission, the size and difficulty of the order, and the reliability, integrity, financial condition, and general execution and operational capabilities of competing broker-dealers. The Manager also may consider the brokerage and research services that broker-dealers provide to the Fund or the Manager. Under certain conditions, a Fund may pay higher brokerage commissions in return for brokerage and research services. In any case, each Fund may effect principal transactions with a dealer who furnishes research services, may designate any dealer to receive selling concessions, discounts, or other allowances, or otherwise may deal with any dealer in connection with the acquisition of securities in underwritings.
To a Fund’s knowledge, no affiliate of any Fund receives give-ups or reciprocal business in connection with its portfolio transactions. No Fund effects transactions with or through broker-dealers in accordance with any formula or for selling shares of any Fund. However, broker-dealers who execute portfolio transactions may from time to time affect purchases of Fund shares for their customers. The 1940 Act generally prohibits Neuberger Berman from acting as principal in the purchase of portfolio securities from, or the sale of portfolio securities to, a Fund unless an appropriate exemption is available.
The Funds may, from time to time, loan portfolio securities to Neuberger Berman and to other affiliated broker-dealers (“Affiliated Borrowers”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of an order issued by the SEC. The order exempts such transactions from the provisions of the 1940 Act that would otherwise prohibit these transactions, subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the order, securities loans made by a Fund to Affiliated Borrowers are fully secured by cash collateral. Each loan to an Affiliated Borrower by a Fund will be made on terms at least as favorable to the Fund as comparable loans to unaffiliated borrowers, and no loans will be made to an Affiliated Borrower unless the Affiliated Borrower represents that the terms are at least as favorable to the Fund as those it provides to unaffiliated lenders in comparable transactions. All affiliated loans will be made with spreads that are not lower than those provided for in a schedule of spreads established by the Independent Fund
Directors. The schedule of spreads will set the lowest spread that can apply with respect to a loan and will permit the spread for each individual loan to be adjusted to cover costs and realize net income for the Funds. All transactions with Affiliated Borrowers will be reviewed periodically by officers of the Fund and reported to the Board of Directors.
In effecting securities transactions, the Funds seek to obtain the best price and execution of orders. Affiliates of NB Management may act as a broker for the Funds in the purchase and sale of their portfolio securities (other than certain securities traded on the OTC market) where such a broker is capable of providing best execution (“Affiliated Brokers”).
The use of an Affiliated Broker for each Fund is subject to the requirements of Section 11(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 11(a) prohibits members of national securities exchanges from retaining compensation for executing exchange transactions for accounts which they or their affiliates manage, except where they have the authorization of the persons authorized to transact business for the account and comply with certain annual reporting requirements. Before an Affiliated Broker is used, the Fund and NB Management expressly authorize the Affiliated Broker to retain such compensation, and the Affiliate Broker would have to agree to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 11(a).
Under the 1940 Act, commissions paid by each Fund to an Affiliated Broker in connection with a purchase or sale of securities on a securities exchange may not exceed the usual and customary broker’s commission. Accordingly, it is each Fund’s policy that the commissions paid an Affiliated Broker must be (1) at least as favorable as commissions contemporaneously charged by the Affiliated Broker on comparable transactions for its most favored unaffiliated customers, except for accounts for which the Affiliated Broker acts as a clearing broker for another brokerage firm and customers of the Affiliated Broker considered by a majority of the Independent Fund Directors not to be comparable to the Fund and (2) at least as favorable as those charged by other brokers having comparable execution capability in NB Management’s judgment. The Funds do not deem it practicable and in its best interests to solicit competitive bids for commissions on each transaction effected by an Affiliated Broker. However, consideration regularly will be given to information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers on comparable transactions during comparable periods of time. The 1940 Act generally prohibits an Affiliated Broker from acting as principal in the purchase of portfolio securities from, or the sale of portfolio securities to, a Fund unless an appropriate exemption is available.
A committee of Independent Fund Directors from time to time will review, among other things, information relating to the commissions charged by an Affiliated Broker to the Funds and to their other customers and information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers having comparable execution capability. In addition, the procedures pursuant to which an Affiliated Broker determines that the commissions paid to the Affiliated Broker by the Funds are fair and reasonable must be reviewed and approved no less often than annually by a majority of the Independent Fund Directors.
To ensure that accounts of all investment clients, including a Fund, are treated fairly in the event that an Affiliated Broker receives transaction instructions regarding the same security for more than one investment account at or about the same time, the Affiliated Broker may combine orders placed on behalf of clients, including advisory accounts in which affiliated persons have an investment interest, for the purpose of negotiating brokerage commissions or obtaining a more favorable price. Where appropriate, securities purchased or sold may be allocated, in terms of amount, to a client according to the proportion that the size of the order placed by that account bears to the aggregate size of orders contemporaneously placed by the other accounts, subject to de minimis exceptions. All participating accounts will pay or receive the same price when orders are combined.
Under policies adopted by the Boards of Directors, an Affiliated Broker may enter into agency cross-trades on behalf of a Fund. An agency cross-trade is a securities transaction in which the same broker acts as agent on both sides of the trade and the broker or an affiliate has discretion over one of the participating accounts. In this situation, the Affiliated Broker would receive brokerage commissions from both participants in the trade. The other account participating in an agency cross-trade with a Fund cannot be an account over which the Affiliated Broker exercises investment discretion. A member of the Board of Directors who will not be affiliated with the Affiliated Broker will review information about each agency cross-trade that the Fund participates in.
In selecting a broker to execute Fund transactions other than an Affiliated Broker, NB Management considers the quality and reliability of brokerage services, including execution capability, speed of execution, overall performance, and financial responsibility, and may consider, among other factors, research and other investment information provided by those brokers as well as any expense offset arrangements offered by the brokers.
In certain instances the Manager specifically allocates brokerage for research services (including research reports on issuers and industries as well as economic and financial data). Such research may sometimes be available for cash purchase. While the receipt of such services has not reduced the Manager’s normal internal research activities, the Manager’s expenses could be materially increased if it were to generate such additional information internally. To the extent such research services are provided by others, the Manager is relieved of expenses it may otherwise incur. In some cases research services are generated by third parties but provided to the Manager by or through broker dealers. Research obtained in this manner may be used in servicing any or all clients of the Manager and may be used in connection with clients other than those client’s whose brokerage commissions are used to acquire the research services described herein. With regard to allocation of brokerage to acquire research services, the Manager always considers its best execution obligation when deciding which broker to utilize.
A committee comprised of officers of NB Management and employees of Neuberger Berman and/or NBFI who are Portfolio Managers of the Funds and Other NB Funds (collectively, “NB Funds”) and some of Neuberger Berman’s and NBFI’s managed accounts (“Managed Accounts”) evaluates quarterly the nature and quality of the brokerage and research services provided by other brokers. Based on this evaluation, the committee establishes a list and projected rankings of preferred brokers for use in determining the relative amounts of commissions to be allocated to those brokers. Ordinarily, the brokers on the list effect a large portion of the brokerage transactions for the NB Funds and the Managed Accounts that are not effected by Neuberger Berman. However, in any semi-annual period, brokers not on the list may be used, and the relative amounts of brokerage commissions paid to the brokers on the list may vary substantially from the projected rankings. These variations reflect the following factors, among others: (1) brokers not on the list or ranking below other brokers on the list may be selected for particular transactions because they provide better price and/or execution, which is the primary consideration in allocating brokerage; (2) adjustments may be required because of periodic changes in the execution capabilities of or research or other services provided by particular brokers or in the execution or research needs of the NB Funds and/or the Managed Accounts; and (3) the aggregate amount of brokerage commissions generated by transactions for the NB Funds and the Managed Accounts may change substantially from one semi-annual period to the next.
The commissions paid to a broker other than an Affiliated Broker may be higher than the amount another firm might charge if the Manager determines in good faith that the amount of those commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by the broker. The Manager believes that those research services benefit the Funds by supplementing the information otherwise available to the Manager. That research may be used by the Manager in servicing Other NB Funds and, in some cases, by Neuberger Berman and/or NBFI in servicing the Managed Accounts. On the other hand, research received by the Manager from brokers effecting portfolio transactions on behalf of the Other NB Funds and by Neuberger Berman and/or NBFI from brokers effecting portfolio transactions on behalf of the Managed Accounts may be used for the Funds’ benefit.
As of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, New NHS was not yet a registered investment company; therefore the Fund does not have brokerage data for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2009, October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2007.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, NHS paid brokerage commissions of $[ ], of which $[ ] was paid to Neuberger Berman and $[ ] was paid to Lehman Brothers.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, NHS paid brokerage commissions of $[ ] of which $[ ] was paid to Neuberger Berman and $[ ] was paid to Lehman Brothers.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, NHS paid brokerage commissions of $[ ] of which $[ ] was paid to Neuberger Berman and $[ ] was paid to Lehman Brothers. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, transactions in which NHS used Neuberger Berman as broker comprised [ ]% of the aggregate dollar amount of transactions involving the payment of commissions, and [ ]% of the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by NHS.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, transactions in which NHS used Lehman Brothers as broker comprised [ ]% of the aggregate dollar amount of transactions involving the payment of commissions, and [ ]% of the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by NHS. [ ]% of the $[ ] paid to other brokers by NHS during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (representing commissions on transactions involving approximately $[ ]) was directed to those brokers at least partially on the basis of research services they provided. [During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, NHS did not acquire securities or hold any securities of its regular brokers or dealers.]
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, NOX paid brokerage commissions of $[ ], of which $[ ] was paid to Neuberger Berman and $[ ] was paid to Lehman Brothers.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, NOX paid brokerage commissions of $[ ] of which $[ ] was paid to Neuberger Berman and $[ ] was paid to Lehman Brothers.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, NOX paid brokerage commissions of $[ ] of which $[ ] was paid to Neuberger Berman and $[ ] was paid to Lehman Brothers. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, transactions in which NOX used Neuberger Berman as broker comprised [ ]% of the aggregate dollar amount of transactions involving the payment of commissions, and [ ]% of the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by NOX. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, transactions in which NOX used Lehman Brothers as broker comprised [ ]% of the aggregate dollar amount of transactions involving the payment of commissions, and [ ]% of the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by NOX. [ ]% of the $[ ] paid to other brokers by NOX during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 (representing commissions on transactions involving approximately $[ ]) was directed to those brokers at least partially on the basis of research services they provided. [During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, NOX did not acquire securities or hold any securities of its regular brokers or dealers.]
Ann H. Benjamin and Thomas P. O’Reilly, each a Managing Director of NB Management, Neuberger Berman and NBFI, are primarily responsible for making decisions as to specific action to be taken with respect to the investments of the Funds. Ann H. Benjamin and Thomas P. O’Reilly serve as portfolio managers for the Registrant since inception. They have each been part of the Registrant’s management team since 2005 and they also manage high yield portfolios for NBFI and its predecessor, an affiliate of Neuberger Berman. She has managed money for NBFI since 1997. Ann H. Benjamin and Thomas P. O’Reilly have full authority to take action with respect to Fund transactions and may or may not consult with other personnel of NB Management prior to taking such action.
NET ASSET VALUE
New NHS and NOX
The NAV attributable to Common Stock of New NHS and NOX is calculated by subtracting a Fund’s total liabilities and the liquidation preference of any outstanding Preferred Shares from total assets (the market value of the securities the Fund holds plus cash and other assets). The NAV per Common Share is calculated by dividing its NAV by the number of Common Stock outstanding and rounding the result to the nearest full cent. Each Fund calculates its NAV as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE, usually 4 p.m. Eastern time, every day on which the NYSE is open.
Each Fund uses an independent pricing service to value their debt securities. Valuations of debt securities provided by an independent pricing service are based on readily available bid quotations, or if quotations are not available, by methods which include considerations such as: yields or prices of securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. If a valuation is not available from an independent pricing service, the Funds seek to obtain quotations from principal market makers. If quotations are not readily available, securities are valued by a method that the Fund Directors believe accurately reflects fair value. The Funds periodically verify valuations provided by the pricing services. Short-term securities
with remaining maturities of less than 60 days may be valued at cost which, when combined with interest earned, approximates market value.
Each Fund uses an independent pricing service to value its equity portfolio securities (including options). The independent pricing service values equity portfolio securities (including options) listed on the NYSE, the American Stock Exchange or other national securities exchanges, and other securities for which market quotations are readily available, at the last reported sale price on the day the securities are being valued. Securities traded primarily on the Nasdaq are normally valued by the independent pricing service at the Nasdaq Official Closing Price (“NOCP”) provided by Nasdaq each business day. The NOCP is the most recently reported price as of 4:00:02 p.m., Eastern time, unless that price is outside the range of the “inside” bid and asked prices (
i.e.
, the bid and asked prices that dealers quote to each other when trading for their own accounts); in that case, Nasdaq will adjust the price to equal the inside bid or asked price, whichever is closer. Because of delays in reporting trades, the NOCP may not be based on the price of the last trade to occur before the market closes.
If there is no reported sale of a security on a particular day, the independent pricing service may value the security based on reported market quotations. If a valuation is not available from an independent pricing service, the Funds seek to obtain quotations from principal market makers. If quotations are not readily available, securities are valued by a method that the Fund Directors believe accurately reflects fair value.
Each Fund’s foreign security prices are furnished by independent quotation services and expressed in local currency values. Foreign security prices are translated from the local currency into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of 4:00 p.m., Eastern time. The Board has approved the use of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Inc. (“Interactive”) to assist in determining the fair value of the Fund’s foreign equity securities when changes in the value of a certain index suggest that the closing prices on the foreign exchanges may no longer represent the amount that the Fund could expect to receive for those securities. In this event, Interactive will provide adjusted prices for certain foreign equity securities using a statistical analysis of historical correlations of multiple factors.
If, after the close of the principal market on which a security is traded, and before the time the Fund’s securities are priced that day, an event occurs that NB Management deems likely to cause a material change in the value of such security, the Boards of Directors have authorized NB Management, subject to the Board’s review, to ascertain a fair value for such security. Such events may include circumstances in which the value of the U.S. markets changes by a percentage deemed significant. Under the 1940 Act, funds are required to act in good faith in determining the fair value of portfolio securities. The SEC has recognized that a security’s valuation may differ depending on the method used for determining value. The fair value ascertained for a security is an estimate and there is no assurance, given the limited information available at the time of fair valuation, that a security’s fair value will be the same as or close to the subsequent opening market price for that security.
If NB Management believes that the price of a security obtained under the Fund’s valuation procedures (as described above) does not represent the amount that the Fund reasonably expects to receive on a current sale of the security, the Fund will value the security based on a method that the Fund Director believe accurately reflects fair value. Numerous factors may be considered when determining the fair value of a security, including available analyst, media or other reports, trading in futures or ADRs and whether the issuer of the security being fair valued has other securities outstanding.
NHS
NHS calculates the net asset value of its Common Shares every day the New York Stock Exchange is open when regular trading closes (normally 4:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time). For purposes of determining the net asset value of a common share, the value of securities held by the Fund plus any cash or other assets (including interest accrued but not yet received) minus all liabilities (including accrued expenses and indebtedness) and the aggregate liquidation value of any outstanding preferred shares is divided by the total number of Common Shares outstanding at such time. The Fund's expenses, including fees payable to Lehman Brothers Asset Management, First Trust and Investors Bank are accrued daily. Currently, the net asset values of shares of publicly traded closed-end investment companies investing in debt securities are published in Barron's, the Monday edition of The Wall Street Journal and the Monday and Saturday editions of The New York Times.
The Fund generally values its portfolio securities using closing market prices or readily available market quotations. The Fund may use a pricing service or a pricing matrix to value some of its assets. When closing market
prices or market quotations are not available or are considered by Lehman Brothers Asset Management to be unreliable, the Fund may use a security's fair value. Fair value is the valuation of a security determined in accordance with procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. The Fund also may use the fair value of a security, including a non-U.S. security, when NBFI determines that the closing market price on the primary exchange where the security is traded no longer accurately reflects the value of the security due to factors affecting one or more relevant securities markets or the specific issuer. The use of fair value pricing by the Fund may cause the net asset value of its shares to differ from the net asset value that would be calculated using closing market prices. International securities markets may be open on days when the U.S. markets are closed. For this reason, the value of any international securities owned by the Fund could change on a day you cannot buy or sell shares of the Fund.
Debt securities with remaining maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which is a method of estimating market value. The value of interest rate swaps, caps and floors is determined in accordance with a formula and then confirmed periodically by obtaining a bank quotation. Positions in options are valued at the last sale price on the market where any such option is principally traded. Positions in futures contracts are valued at closing prices for such contracts established by the exchange on which they are traded, Repurchase agreements are valued at cost plus accrued interest.
REPURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK; TENDER OFFERS;
CONVERSION TO OPEN-END FUND
Each Fund is a closed-end investment company and as such its stockholders will not have the right to cause a Fund to redeem their shares. Instead, each Fund’s Common Stock will trade in the open market at a price that will be a function of several factors, including dividend levels (which in turn are affected by expenses), NAV, call protection, price, dividend stability, relative demand for and supply of such shares in the market, general market and economic conditions and other factors. Shares of a closed-end investment company may frequently trade at prices lower than NAV. The Board of each Fund regularly monitors the relationship between the market price and NAV of the Common Stock. If the Common Stock were to trade at a substantial discount to NAV for an extended period of time, the Board of each Fund may consider the repurchase of its Common Stock on the open market or in private transactions, or the making of a tender offer for such shares, or the conversion of the Fund to an open-end
investment company. There can be no assurance, however, that the Board of each Fund will decide to take or propose any of these actions, or that share repurchases or tender offers, if undertaken, will actually reduce market discount. Each Fund has no present intention to repurchase its Common Stock and would do so only in the circumstances described in this section.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time when Preferred Shares are outstanding, each Fund may not purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of its Common Stock unless (1) all accrued dividends on Preferred Shares have been paid and (2) at the time of such purchase, redemption or acquisition, the NAV of the Fund’s portfolio (determined after deducting the acquisition price of the Common Stock) is at least 200% of the liquidation value of the outstanding Preferred Shares (expected to equal the original purchase price per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon).
Subject to its investment limitations, each Fund may borrow to finance the repurchase of shares or to make a tender offer. Interest on any borrowings to finance share repurchase transactions or the accumulation of cash by a Fund in anticipation of share repurchases or tenders will reduce the Fund’s net income. Any share repurchase, tender offer or borrowing that might be approved by the Board of each Fund would have to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
The Board of each Fund may also from time to time consider submitting to the holders of the shares of stock of the Fund a proposal to convert the Fund to an open-end investment company. In determining whether to exercise its sole discretion to submit this issue to stockholders, the Board of each Fund would consider all factors then relevant, including the relationship of the market price of the Common Stock to NAV, the extent to which the Fund’s capital structure is leveraged and the possibility of re-leveraging, the spread, if any, between the yields on securities in the Fund’s portfolio and interest and dividend charges on Preferred Shares issued by the Fund and general market and economic conditions.
See “Anti-Takeover Provisions” in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus for a discussion of voting requirements applicable to conversion of each Fund to an open-end company. If a Fund converted to an open-end company, it would be required to redeem all Preferred Shares then outstanding, and the Fund’s Common Stock would no longer be listed on the NYSE or AMEX. Holders of common stock of an open-end investment company may require the company to redeem their shares on any business day (except in certain circumstances as authorized by or under the 1940 Act) at their NAV, less such redemption charge, if any, as might be in effect at the time of redemption. In order to avoid maintaining large cash positions or liquidating favorable investments to meet redemptions, open-end companies typically engage in a continuous offering of their common stock. Open-end companies are thus subject to periodic asset in-flows and out-flows that can complicate portfolio management.
The repurchase by a Fund of its shares at prices below NAV will result in an increase in the NAV of those shares that remain outstanding. However, there can be no assurance that share repurchases or tenders at or below NAV will result in a Fund’s shares trading at a price equal to their NAV. Nevertheless, the fact that a Fund’s shares may be the subject of repurchase or tender offers at NAV from time to time, or that a Fund may be converted to an open-end company, may reduce any spread between market price and NAV that might otherwise exist.
In addition, a purchase by a Fund of the Common Stock will decrease its total assets. This would likely have the effect of increasing the Fund’s expense ratio. Any purchase by a Fund of Common Stock at a time when Preferred Shares are outstanding will increase the leverage applicable to the outstanding Common Stock then remaining. See the Proxy Statement/Prospectus in Appendix B under “Risk of Financial Leverage.”
Before deciding whether to take any action if a Fund’s Common Stock trade below NAV, the Board of the Fund would consider all relevant factors, including the extent and duration of the discount, the liquidity of the Fund’s portfolio, the impact of any action that might be taken on the Fund or its stockholders and market considerations. Based on these considerations, even if a Fund’s shares should trade at a discount, the Board of the Fund may determine that, in the interest of the Fund and its stockholders, no action should be taken.
TAX MATTERS
Set forth below is a discussion of the material federal income and excise tax aspects concerning the Funds and the purchase, ownership and disposition of Common Stock and Preferred Shares (collectively, “Shares”). This discussion does not purport to be complete or to deal with all aspects of federal taxation that may be relevant to stockholders in light of their particular circumstances. Unless otherwise noted, this discussion assumes that you are a U.S. person and hold your Shares as capital assets. This discussion is based on current provisions of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder (“Regulations”) and existing judicial decisions and administrative pronouncements, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisers with regard to the federal tax consequences of the purchase, ownership or disposition of Shares, as well as the tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality, foreign country or other taxing jurisdiction.
Taxation of the Funds
Each Fund has qualified, and intends to continue to qualify each taxable year, for treatment as a RIC. To qualify for that treatment, a Fund must, among other things:
(1) derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from (a) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans and gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business of investing in securities or those currencies, and (b) net income from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (as defined below) (“QPTP”) (“Income Requirement”);
(2) distribute with respect to each taxable year at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (consisting generally of net investment income, the excess of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss (“short-term capital gain”) and net gains and losses from certain foreign currency transactions, if any, all determined without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) for that year (“Distribution Requirement”); and
(3) diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of its taxable year, (a) at least 50% of the value of its total assets is represented by cash and cash items, U.S. Government securities, securities of other RICs and other securities limited in respect of any one issuer to a value not greater than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and to not more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities (equity securities of QPTPs being considered voting securities for these purposes), and (b) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is invested in (i) the securities (other than those of the U.S. Government or other RICs) of any one issuer, (ii) the securities of two or more issuers that the Fund controls and are engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) the securities of one or more QPTPs.
A QPTP is defined as a publicly traded partnership (generally, a partnership the interests in which are “traded on an established securities market” or are “readily tradable on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof)”) other than a partnership at least 90% of the gross income of which consists of dividends, interest and other qualifying income for a RIC.
If a Fund qualifies for treatment as a RIC, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income and gains it timely distributes to its stockholders. If a Fund failed to qualify for treatment as a RIC for any taxable year, then for federal tax purposes (1) it would be taxed as an ordinary corporation on the full amount of its taxable income for that year without being able to deduct the distributions it makes to its stockholders and (2) the stockholders would treat all those distributions, including distributions of net capital gain (
i.e.
, the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss), as dividends to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits, taxable as ordinary income (except that, for individual stockholders, the part thereof that is “qualified dividend income” would be subject to federal income tax at the rate for net capital gain -- a maximum of 15%), and those dividends would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction available to corporations under certain circumstances. In addition, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest and make substantial distributions before requalifying for treatment as a RIC.
To the extent a Fund fails to distribute in a calendar year at least an amount equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income for that year plus (2) 98% of its capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 of that year plus (3) 100% of any retained amount of either from the prior year, it will be subject to a nondeductible 4% federal excise tax (“Excise Tax”). For these purposes, a Fund will be treated as having distributed any amount with respect to which it pays income tax. A distribution a Fund pays to stockholders in January of any year generally will be deemed to have been paid on December 31 of the preceding year if the distribution is declared and payable to stockholders of record on a date in October, November or December of the preceding year. Each Fund intends generally to make distributions sufficient to avoid imposition of the Excise Tax.
If, at any time when Preferred Shares are outstanding, a Fund fails to meet the Preferred Shares Basic Maintenance Amount or the 1940 Act Preferred Shares Asset Coverage (both as defined in each Fund’s Articles Supplementary, which are substantially similar), it will be required to suspend distributions to Common Stockholders until that maintenance amount or asset coverage, as the case may be, is restored. See “Description of Preferred Shares – Restrictions on Dividends and Other Distributions” in Appendix D attached to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Such a suspension may prevent a Fund from satisfying the Distribution Requirement and may therefore jeopardize its qualification for treatment as a RIC or cause it to incur an income tax or Excise Tax liability, or both. If a Fund fails to meet that maintenance amount or asset coverage when Preferred Shares are outstanding, it will be required to redeem Preferred Shares to maintain or restore that maintenance amount or asset coverage, as the case may be, and avoid the adverse consequences to the Fund and its stockholders of failing to qualify for treatment as a RIC. There can be no assurance, however, that any such redemption would achieve that objective.
Taxation of the Stockholders
Distributions
. As long as a Fund qualifies for treatment as a RIC, distributions it makes to its stockholders from its investment company taxable income will be taxable to them as ordinary income to the extent of its earnings and profits. Each Fund currently expects that most of the dividends it pays will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction available to corporations or the 15% maximum federal income tax rate on “qualified dividend income” received by individuals. A Fund’s distributions of net capital gain that it properly designates as such (“Capital Gain Dividends”) will be taxable to each stockholder thereof as long-term capital gain, regardless of how long the stockholder has held the Fund’s Shares. Capital Gain Dividends a Fund pays to individuals with respect to net capital gain it recognizes on sales or exchanges of capital assets through October 31, 2011, will be subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 15%.
Distributions by a Fund will be taxable as described above whether received in cash or reinvested in additional Common Stock through the Fund’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan. A Common Stockholder whose distributions are so reinvested will be treated as having received a distribution equal to either (1) the fair market value of the newly issued Common Stock or (2) if the Common Stock are trading below their NAV, the amount of cash allocated to the stockholder for the purchase of Common Stock on its behalf in the open market.
The benefits of the reduced tax rates applicable to individual stockholders’ net capital gain and qualified dividend income may be impacted by the application of the alternative minimum tax to them.
Distributions on a Fund’s Common Stock are generally subject to federal income tax as described above, even though those distributions may economically represent a return of a particular stockholder’s investment. Those distributions are likely to occur on a Fund’s Common Stock purchased when their NAV includes gains that are either unrealized or realized but not distributed or income that is not distributed. Those realized gains may be required to be distributed even when those Common Stock’ NAV reflects unrealized losses. Distributions are taxable to a stockholder of a Fund even if they are paid from income or gains the Fund earned before the stockholder invested in Shares (and thus were reflected in the price the stockholder paid).
If a Fund makes a distribution to a stockholder in excess of its current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess distribution will be treated as a “return of capital” to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis in its Shares and thereafter as capital gain. A return of capital is not taxable, but it reduces a stockholder’s tax basis in its Shares, thus reducing any loss or increasing any gain on a subsequent taxable disposition by the stockholder of the Shares. Current earnings and profits will be, and accumulated earnings and profits may be, treated as first being used
to pay distributions on Preferred Shares, and only the remaining earnings and profits will be treated as being used to pay distributions on the Common Stock.
Dividends a Fund pays to a foreign stockholder, other than (1) dividends paid to a foreign stockholder whose ownership of Shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business the stockholder carries on and (2) Capital Gain Dividends paid to a nonresident alien individual who is physically present in the United States for no more than 182 days during the taxable year, generally will be subject to a federal withholding tax of 30% (or lower treaty rate). However, two categories of dividends, “short-term capital gain dividends” and “interest-related dividends,” if properly designated by a Fund, will be exempt from that tax. “Short-term capital gain dividends” are dividends that are attributable to short-term capital gain, computed with certain adjustments. “Interest-related dividends,” which neither Fund expects to distribute a significant amount of, are dividends that are attributable to “qualified net interest income” (“qualified interest income,” which generally consists of certain OID, interest on obligations “in registered form” and interest on deposits, less allocable deductions). The exemption from withholding tax will apply to short-term capital gain dividends and interest-related dividends a Fund pays to foreign investors, with certain exceptions, only with respect to its current taxable year (ending October 31, 2008), unless Congress enacts legislation extending its applicability.
If (1) a Fund may redeem all or part of a series of Preferred Shares on payment of a premium, (2) based on all the facts and circumstances, the Fund is more likely than not to make that redemption and (3) that premium exceeds a specified
de minimis
amount, it is possible that the holders of that series may be required to accrue the premium as a dividend (to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits) in advance of the receipt of cash representing the premium.
Each Fund will notify its stockholders annually as to the federal tax status of Fund distributions to them.
Sale or Redemption of Shares
. A stockholder’s sale or other disposition of Shares may give rise to a taxable gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the stockholder’s basis in those Shares. In general, any gain or loss realized on a taxable disposition of Shares will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss (and thus eligible, in the case of individuals, for the 15% maximum federal income tax rate on net capital gain described above) if the Shares have been held for more than one year; otherwise, any such gain or loss will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss. However, if a stockholder sells Shares at a loss within six months of their purchase, that loss will be treated as long-term, rather than short-term, to the extent of any Capital Gain Dividends the stockholder received with respect to the Shares. All or a portion of any loss realized on a taxable disposition of a Fund’s Shares will be disallowed if other Shares of the Fund are purchased within 30 days before or after the disposition. In that case, the basis in the newly purchased Shares will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
From time to time a Fund may make a tender offer for some of its Shares. A tender of Shares pursuant to such an offer would be a taxable event. If a Fund decides to make a tender offer, the tax consequences thereof will be disclosed in the documents relating to the offer.
A Fund may, at its option, redeem Preferred Shares in whole or in part and is required to redeem Preferred Shares to the extent required to maintain the Preferred Shares Basic Maintenance Amount and the 1940 Act Preferred Shares Asset Coverage. Gain or loss, if any, resulting from such a redemption will be taxed as gain or loss from the sale or exchange of the Preferred Shares rather than as a dividend, but only if the redemption distribution (1) is deemed not to be essentially equivalent to a dividend, (2) is in complete redemption of an owner’s interest in the redeeming Fund, (3) is substantially disproportionate with respect to the owner’s interest in the Fund or (4) with respect to non-corporate owners, is in partial liquidation of the Fund. For purposes of clauses (1), (2) and (3), a holder’s ownership of Common Stock will be taken into account.
Under the Regulations, if a stockholder recognizes a loss with respect to Shares of (1) $2 million or more in any single taxable year (or $4 million or more in the taxable year in which the loss is recognized and the five succeeding taxable years) for an individual stockholder, or (2) five times those amounts for a corporate stockholder, the stockholder must file with the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) a disclosure statement on Form 8886. Direct stockholders of portfolio securities are in many cases excepted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance stockholders of a RIC are not excepted. Future guidance may extend the current exception from this
reporting requirement to stockholders of most or all RICs. The fact that a loss is reportable under these Regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Stockholders should consult their own tax advisers to determine the applicability of these Regulations in light of their individual circumstances.
Backup Withholding
. Each Fund generally is required to withhold and remit to the U.S. Treasury 28% (except as noted below) of all distributions (including Capital Gain Dividends) and redemption proceeds otherwise payable to any individual or certain other non-corporate stockholder who fails to properly furnish the Fund with a correct taxpayer identification number. Withholding at that rate also is required from all distributions by a Fund otherwise payable to such a stockholder who has under-reported dividend or interest income or who fails to certify to the Fund that he or she is not otherwise subject to that withholding (together with the withholding described in the preceding sentence, “backup withholding”). The backup withholding rate will increase to 31% for amounts paid after December 31, 2010, unless Congress enacts legislation providing otherwise. Backup withholding is not an additional tax, and any amounts withheld with respect to a stockholder may be credited against the stockholder’s federal income tax liability.
Tax Consequences of Certain Investments
[Certain Real Estate Companies
. Income that a Fund derives from a Real Estate Company classified for federal tax purposes as a partnership (and not as a corporation or REIT) that is not a QPTP (“RE Partnership”) will be treated as qualifying income under the Income Requirement only to the extent it is attributable to the RE Partnership’s income items that would be qualifying income if realized directly by the Fund in the same manner as realized by the RE Partnership. Each Fund will restrict its investment in RE Partnerships to maintain its qualification as a RIC.
REMICs
. REITs in which a Fund may invest that (1) hold residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) or (2) engage in mortgage securitization transactions that cause the REITs to be taxable mortgage pools (“TMPs”) or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP. A portion of the net income allocable to REMIC residual interest holders may be an “excess inclusion.” The Code authorizes the issuance of Regulations dealing with the taxation and reporting of excess inclusion income of REITs and RICs that hold residual REMIC interests and of REITs, or qualified REIT subsidiaries, that are TMPs. Although those Regulations have not yet been issued, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Service recently issued a notice (“Notice”) announcing that, pending the issuance of further guidance, the Service would apply the principles in the following paragraphs to all excess inclusion income, whether from REMIC residual interests or TMPs.
The Notice provides that a REIT must (1) determine whether it or its qualified REIT subsidiary (or a part of either) is a TMP and, if so, calculate the TMP’s excess inclusion income under a “reasonable method,” (2) allocate its excess inclusion income to its stockholders generally in proportion to dividends paid, (3) inform stockholders that are not “disqualified organizations” (
i.e.
, governmental units and tax-exempt entities that are not subject to the unrelated business income tax) of the amount and character of the excess inclusion income allocated thereto, (4) pay tax (at the highest federal income tax rate imposed on corporations) on the excess inclusion income allocated to its disqualified organization stockholders, and (5) apply the withholding tax provisions with respect to the excess inclusion part of dividends paid to foreign persons without regard to any treaty exception or reduction in tax rate. Excess inclusion income allocated to certain tax-exempt entities (including qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts and public charities) constitutes unrelated business taxable income to them.
A RIC with excess inclusion income is subject to rules identical to those in clauses (2) through (5) (substituting “that are nominees” for “that are not ‘disqualified organizations’” in clause (3) and inserting “record stockholders that are” after “its” in clause (4)). The Notice further provides that a RIC is not required to report the amount and character of the excess inclusion income allocated to its stockholders that are not nominees, except that for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006, (1) a RIC with excess inclusion income from all sources that exceeds 1% of its gross income must do so and (2) any other RIC must do so by taking into account only excess inclusion income allocated to the RIC from REITs the excess inclusion income of which exceeded 3% of its dividends. Neither Fund will invest directly in REMIC residual interests or intends to invest in REITs that, to its knowledge, invest in those interests or are TMPs or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP.
After calendar year-end, REITs can and often do change the category (
e.g.
, ordinary income dividend, capital gain distribution or return of capital) of the distributions they have made during that year, which would result at that time in a Fund’s also having to re-categorize some of the distributions it has made to its stockholders. These changes would be reflected in your annual Form 1099, together with other tax information. Those forms generally will be distributed to you in January of each year, although a Fund may, in one or more years, request from the Service an extension of time to distribute those forms until mid-or late-February to enable it to receive the latest information it can from the REITs in which it invests and thereby accurately report that information to you on a single form (rather than having to send you an amended form).]
Hedging Transactions
.
The use of hedging strategies, such as writing (selling) and purchasing options and futures contracts and entering into forward contracts, involves complex rules that will determine for income tax purposes the amount, character and timing of recognition of the gains and losses a Fund realizes in connection therewith. Gains from the disposition of foreign currencies (except certain gains that may be excluded by future Regulations), and gains from options, futures and forward contracts a Fund derives with respect to its business of investing in securities or foreign currencies, will be treated as qualifying income under the Income Requirement.
Certain of a Fund’s investment practices are subject to special and complex federal income tax provisions that may, among other things, (1) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions, (2) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain to higher taxed short-term capital gain or ordinary income, (3) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction to a capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (4) cause the Fund to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash, (5) adversely affect the timing as to when a purchase or sale of securities is deemed to occur and (6) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions. Each Fund will monitor its transactions and may make certain tax elections to mitigate the effect of these rules and prevent its disqualification as a RIC.
Foreign Securities
. Dividends and interest a Fund receives, and gains it realizes, may be subject to income, withholding or other taxes imposed by foreign countries and U.S. possessions that would reduce the total return on its securities. Tax treaties between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate these taxes, however, and many foreign countries do not impose taxes on capital gains in respect of investments by foreign investors.
A Fund may invest in the stock of “passive foreign investment companies” (“PFICs”). A PFIC is any foreign corporation (with certain exceptions) that, in general, meets either of the following tests: (1) at least 75% of its gross income for the taxable year is passive or (2) an average of at least 50% of its assets produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. Under certain circumstances, if a Fund holds stock of a PFIC, it will be subject to federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” the Fund receives on the stock or of any gain on its disposition of the stock (collectively, “PFIC income”), plus interest thereon, even if the Fund distributes the PFIC income as a taxable dividend to its stockholders. The balance of the PFIC income will be included in the Fund’s investment company taxable income and, accordingly, will not be taxable to it to the extent it distributes that income to its stockholders. Fund distributions attributable to PFIC income will not be eligible for the 15% maximum federal income tax rate on qualified dividend income mentioned above.
If a Fund invests in a PFIC and elects to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”), then in lieu of the Fund’s incurring the foregoing tax and interest obligation, it would be required to include in income each year its
pro rata
share of the QEF’s annual ordinary earnings and net capital gain -- which the Fund most likely would have to distribute to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax -- even if the Fund did not receive those earnings and gain from the QEF. In most instances it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to make this election because of certain requirements thereof.
A Fund may elect to “mark-to-market” any stock in a PFIC it owns at the end of its taxable year. “Marking-to-market,” in this context, means including in ordinary income for each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock over a Fund’s adjusted basis therein as of the end of that year. Pursuant to the election, a Fund also may deduct (as an ordinary, not capital, loss) the excess, if any, of its adjusted basis in PFIC stock over the fair market value thereof as of the taxable year-end, but only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains with respect to that stock the Fund included in income for prior taxable years under the election. A Fund’s adjusted basis
in each PFIC’s stock subject to the election would be adjusted to reflect the amounts of income included and deductions taken thereunder.
Securities Issued at a Discount
. A Fund may acquire zero coupon or other securities issued with accrued OID. As a holder of those securities, a Fund must include in gross income the OID that accrues on them during the taxable year, even if it receives no corresponding payment on them during the year. Because each Fund annually must distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income, including any accrued OID, to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax, it may be required in a particular year to distribute as a dividend an amount that is greater than the total amount of cash it actually receives. Those distributions will be made from a Fund’s cash assets or from the proceeds of sales of its portfolio securities, if necessary. A Fund may realize capital gains or losses from those sales, which would increase or decrease its investment company taxable income and/or net capital gain.
REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
Stockholders of each Fund will receive unaudited semi-annual financial statements, as well as year-end financial statements audited by the independent registered public accounting firm for the Fund. Each Fund’s statements show the investments owned by it and the market values thereof and provide other information about the Fund and its operations.
CUSTODIAN AND TRANSFER AGENT
State Street Bank and Trust Company, 2 Avenue de Lafayette, Boston, MA 02110,
serves as custodian for assets of each Fund. The custodian performs custodial and fund accounting services. The Bank of New York Mellon, Attn: Corporate Trust Administration, 100 Church Street, 8
th
Floor, New York, New York 10286, ATTN: Corporate Trust, Dealing and Trading-Auction Desk, serves as the transfer agent and registrar for each Fund’s Common Stock and Preferred Stock, as well as agent for each Fund’s distribution reinvestment plan relating to its Common Stock.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP, 200 Clarendon Street, Boston, MA 02116, serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Funds. Ernst & Young LLP provides audit services, tax return preparation and assistance and consultation in connection with review of the Funds’ filings with the SEC.
COUNSEL
K&L Gates LLP, 1601 K Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20006, will pass upon certain legal matters in connection with the Common Stock offered by New NHS, and also acts as counsel to each Fund.
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
A Registration Statement on Form N-14, including any amendments thereto, relating to the shares of New NHS offered hereby, will be filed by New NHS with the SEC, Washington, D.C. The Proxy Statement/Prospectus and this SAI do not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement, including any exhibits and schedules thereto. For further information with respect to New NHS and the shares offered or to be offered hereby, reference is made to New NHS’s Registration Statement. Statements contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and this SAI as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. Copies of the Registration Statement may be inspected without charge at the SEC’s principal office in Washington, D.C., and copies of all or any part thereof may be obtained from the SEC upon the payment of certain fees prescribed by the SEC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements and related documents are incorporated herein by reference from NOX’s and NHS’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 for NHS and October 31, 2009 for NOX:
The audited financial statements of NHS and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and the reports of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, with respect to such audited financial statements of the Fund.
The audited financial statements of NOX and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, and the reports of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, with respect to such audited financial statements of the Fund.
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Shown below are the financial statements for NHS and NOX and
pro forma
financial statements for New NHS, assuming the Reorganization is consummated as of December 31, 2010. The first table presents the Schedule of Investments for NHS and NOX and
pro forma
figures for New NHS. The second table presents the Statements of Assets and Liabilities for NHS and NOX and estimated
pro forma
figures for New NHS. The third table presents the Statements of Operations for NHS and NOX and estimated
pro forma
figures for New NHS. These tables are followed by the Notes to the
Pro Forma
Financial Statements.
NEUBERGER BERMAN DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
Pro Forma Combined Schedule of Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEUBERGER BERMAN DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined Schedule of Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuberger Berman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
High Yield
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
High Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunity
|
Strategies
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Opportunity
|
|
Strategies
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Inc.
|
Fund
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stocks (11.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartments (1.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,200
|
0
|
18,200
|
|
American Campus Communities
|
|
$511,420
|
|
$0
|
|
|
$511,420
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
0
|
10,000
|
|
AvalonBay Communities
|
|
821,100
|
|
0
|
|
|
821,100
|
|
|
|
|
46,800
|
0
|
46,800
|
|
Equity Residential
|
|
1,580,904
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,580,904
|
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
0
|
2,400
|
|
Essex Property Trust
|
|
200,760
|
|
0
|
|
|
200,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,114,184
|
|
0
|
|
|
3,114,184
|
|
1.31%
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,324
|
0
|
17,324
|
|
Vornado Realty Trust
|
|
1,211,641
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,211,641
|
|
0.51%
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services (0.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
11,536
|
11,536
|
|
CIT Group, Inc. *
|
|
0
|
|
318,509
|
|
|
318,509
|
|
0.13%
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care (1.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,600
|
0
|
38,600
|
|
HCP, Inc.
|
|
1,178,844
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,178,844
|
|
|
|
|
12,002
|
0
|
12,002
|
|
Health Care REIT
|
|
531,929
|
|
0
|
|
|
531,929
|
|
|
|
|
17,800
|
0
|
17,800
|
|
Nationwide Health Properties
|
|
626,204
|
|
0
|
|
|
626,204
|
|
|
|
|
33,600
|
0
|
33,600
|
|
OMEGA Healthcare Investors (e)
|
|
653,520
|
|
0
|
|
|
653,520
|
|
|
|
|
27,900
|
0
|
27,900
|
|
Ventas, Inc.
|
|
1,220,346
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,220,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,210,843
|
|
0
|
|
|
4,210,843
|
|
1.77%
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Financing (1.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,200
|
0
|
77,200
|
|
Annaly Capital Management
|
|
1,339,420
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,339,420
|
|
|
|
|
52,700
|
0
|
52,700
|
|
Starwood Property Trust
|
|
995,503
|
|
0
|
|
|
995,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,334,923
|
|
0
|
|
|
2,334,923
|
|
0.98%
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial (1.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,700
|
0
|
30,700
|
|
AMB Property
|
|
784,385
|
|
0
|
|
|
784,385
|
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
0
|
19,500
|
|
EastGroup Properties
|
|
746,460
|
|
0
|
|
|
746,460
|
|
|
|
|
81,300
|
0
|
81,300
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
1,112,997
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,112,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,643,842
|
|
0
|
|
|
2,643,842
|
|
1.11%
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging (0.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,606
|
0
|
48,606
|
|
Host Hotels & Resorts
|
|
567,232
|
|
0
|
|
|
567,232
|
|
0.24%
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office (1.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,300
|
0
|
6,300
|
|
Boston Properties
|
|
422,540
|
|
0
|
|
|
422,540
|
|
|
|
|
98,000
|
0
|
98,000
|
|
Brandywine Realty Trust
|
|
1,117,200
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,117,200
|
|
|
|
|
51,800
|
0
|
51,800
|
|
Highwoods Properties (e)
|
|
1,727,530
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,727,530
|
|
|
|
|
18,300
|
0
|
18,300
|
|
SL Green Realty (e)
|
|
919,392
|
|
0
|
|
|
919,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,186,662
|
|
0
|
|
|
4,186,662
|
|
1.76%
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Management & Development (0.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,300
|
0
|
71,300
|
|
Brookfield Properties
|
|
864,156
|
|
0
|
|
|
864,156
|
|
0.36%
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Malls (1.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,566
|
0
|
37,566
|
|
Macerich Co. (e)
|
|
1,350,498
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,350,498
|
|
|
|
|
15,723
|
0
|
15,723
|
|
Simon Property Group
|
|
1,254,695
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,254,695
|
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
0
|
5,500
|
|
Taubman Centers
|
|
197,505
|
|
0
|
|
|
197,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,802,698
|
|
0
|
|
|
2,802,698
|
|
1.18%
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self Storage (0.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,400
|
0
|
55,400
|
|
Extra Space Storage
|
|
639,870
|
|
0
|
|
|
639,870
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
0
|
2,700
|
|
Public Storage, Depositary Shares
|
|
68,445
|
|
0
|
|
|
68,445
|
|
|
|
|
31,700
|
0
|
31,700
|
|
Sovran Self Storage
|
|
1,132,641
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,132,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,840,956
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,840,956
|
|
0.77%
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping Centers (1.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
0
|
7,700
|
|
Federal Realty Investment Trust
|
|
521,444
|
|
0
|
|
|
521,444
|
|
|
|
|
55,700
|
0
|
55,700
|
|
Kimco Realty
|
|
753,621
|
|
0
|
|
|
753,621
|
|
|
|
|
17,800
|
0
|
17,800
|
|
Regency Centers
|
|
624,068
|
|
0
|
|
|
624,068
|
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
0
|
18,400
|
|
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers
|
|
717,416
|
|
0
|
|
|
717,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,616,549
|
|
0
|
|
|
2,616,549
|
|
1.10%
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty (0.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
0
|
4,000
|
|
Digital Realty Trust
|
|
201,120
|
|
0
|
|
|
201,120
|
|
|
|
|
17,500
|
0
|
17,500
|
|
Rayonier Inc.
|
|
737,800
|
|
0
|
|
|
737,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
938,920
|
|
0
|
|
|
938,920
|
|
0.39%
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Common Stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $19,489,195, $285,569, and $19,774,764, respectively)
|
|
27,332,606
|
|
318,509
|
|
|
27,651,115
|
|
11.594%
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stocks (6.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartments (0.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,500
|
0
|
65,500
|
|
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Ser. H
|
|
1,638,155
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,638,155
|
|
0.69%
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking (0.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
253
|
318
|
|
GMAC, Ser. G, 7.00%, due 12/31/49
|
|
42,843
|
|
166,759
|
|
|
209,602
|
|
0.09%
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
0
|
25,000
|
|
Health Care REIT, Ser. D
|
|
618,750
|
|
0
|
|
|
618,750
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
0
|
34,000
|
|
LTC Properties, Ser. F
|
|
825,520
|
|
0
|
|
|
825,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,444,270
|
|
|
|
|
1,444,270
|
|
0.61%
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid (0.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
0
|
50,000
|
|
iStar Financial, Ser. E
|
|
357,500
|
|
0
|
|
|
357,500
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
0
|
60,000
|
|
iStar Financial, Ser. F
|
|
429,600
|
|
0
|
|
|
429,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787,100
|
|
0
|
|
|
787,100
|
|
0.33%
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging (1.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
0
|
50,000
|
|
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Ser. D
|
|
898,500
|
|
0
|
|
|
898,500
|
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
0
|
36,000
|
|
Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust *
|
|
9,000
|
|
0
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
22,600
|
0
|
22,600
|
|
Hersha Hospitality Trust, Ser. A
|
|
440,700
|
|
0
|
|
|
440,700
|
|
|
|
|
15,800
|
0
|
15,800
|
|
Host Hotels & Resorts, Ser. E
|
|
402,900
|
|
0
|
|
|
402,900
|
|
|
|
|
77,500
|
0
|
77,500
|
|
LaSalle Hotel Properties, Ser. B
|
|
1,819,700
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,819,700
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
0
|
28,000
|
|
LaSalle Hotel Properties, Ser. D
|
|
612,920
|
|
0
|
|
|
612,920
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
0
|
6,000
|
|
Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Ser. B
|
|
81,600
|
|
0
|
|
|
81,600
|
|
|
|
|
154,000
|
0
|
154,000
|
|
W2007 Grace Acquisition I, Ser. B *
|
|
46,200
|
|
0
|
|
|
46,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,311,520
|
|
0
|
|
|
4,311,520
|
|
1.81%
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office (0.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
0
|
60,000
|
|
DRA CRT Acquisition, Ser. A
|
|
720,000
|
|
0
|
|
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
0
|
60,000
|
|
Kilroy Realty, Ser. E
|
|
1,449,000
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,449,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,169,000
|
|
0
|
|
|
2,169,000
|
|
0.91%
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Malls (1.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
0
|
60,000
|
|
Glimcher Realty Trust, Ser. F
|
|
1,101,600
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,101,600
|
|
|
|
|
61,600
|
0
|
61,600
|
|
Glimcher Realty Trust, Ser. G
|
|
1,065,680
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,065,680
|
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
0
|
11,300
|
|
Taubman Centers, Ser. G
|
|
277,302
|
|
0
|
|
|
277,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,444,582
|
|
0
|
|
|
2,444,582
|
|
1.025%
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping Centers (0.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
0
|
20,000
|
|
Cedar Shopping Centers, Ser. A
|
|
479,400
|
|
0
|
|
|
479,400
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
0
|
12,000
|
|
Developers Diversified Realty, Ser. I
|
|
225,480
|
|
0
|
|
|
225,480
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
0
|
34,000
|
|
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Ser. C
|
|
806,140
|
|
0
|
|
|
806,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,511,020
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,511,020
|
|
0.634%
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
0
|
25,000
|
|
Digital Realty Trust, Ser. A
|
|
631,375
|
|
0
|
|
|
631,375
|
|
|
|
|
16,900
|
0
|
16,900
|
|
Digital Realty Trust, Ser. B
|
|
419,796
|
|
0
|
|
|
419,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,051,171
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,051,171
|
|
0.441%
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $24,116,131, $50,254, and $24,166,385, respectively)
|
|
15,399,661
|
|
166,759
|
|
|
15,566,420
|
|
6.527%
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Loan Obligations (7.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airlines (2.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,095,770
|
3,899,200
|
5,994,970
|
|
United Airlines, Inc., Term Loan B, 2.28%, due 2/1/14
|
|
1,645,934
|
|
3,062,276
|
|
|
4,708,210
|
|
2.0%
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric - Generation (4.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,714,060
|
7,957,603
|
12,671,663
|
|
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC, Term Loan DD, 3.51%, due 10/10/14
|
|
3,808,300
|
|
6,428,629
|
|
|
10,236,929
|
|
4.3%
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media-Cable (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,023
|
833,737
|
1,282,760
|
|
Cequel Communication LLC, Term Loan B, 6.28%, due 5/5/14
|
|
447,339
|
|
830,610
|
|
|
1,277,949
|
|
0.5%
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software Services (0.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,517
|
353,193
|
542,710
|
|
First Data Corp., Term Loan B1, 3.25%, due 9/24/14
|
|
168,065
|
|
313,216
|
|
|
481,281
|
|
|
|
|
669,211
|
1,235,390
|
1,904,601
|
|
First Data Corp., Term Loan B2, 3.00%, due 9/24/14
|
|
593,275
|
|
1,095,210
|
|
|
1,688,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,340
|
|
1,408,426
|
|
|
2,169,766
|
|
0.9%
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Loan Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $5,867,702, $10,287,866, and $16,155,568, respectively)
|
|
6,662,913
|
|
11,729,941
|
|
|
18,392,854
|
|
7.712%
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Debt Securities (116.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airlines (3.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
455,000
|
700,000
|
|
American Airlines, Inc., Pass-Through Certificates, Ser. 2009-1A, 10.38%, due 7/2/19
|
|
270,725
|
|
502,775
|
|
|
773,500
|
|
|
|
|
620,000
|
1,155,000
|
1,775,000
|
|
American Airlines, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 10.50%, due 10/15/12
|
|
647,900
|
|
1,206,975
|
|
|
1,854,875
|
|
|
|
|
490,000
|
895,000
|
1,385,000
|
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Pass-Through Certificates, Ser. 2001-1, Class B, 7.71%, due 9/18/11
|
|
482,650
|
|
881,575
|
|
|
1,364,225
|
|
|
|
|
505,000
|
930,000
|
1,435,000
|
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 9.50%, due 9/15/14
|
|
524,569
|
|
966,037
|
|
|
1,490,606
|
|
|
|
|
650,830
|
1,224,288
|
1,875,118
|
|
United Airlines, Inc., Pass-Through Certificates, Ser. 2007-1, Class A, 6.64%, due 7/2/22
|
|
553,205
|
|
1,040,645
|
|
|
1,593,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,479,049
|
|
4,598,007
|
|
|
7,077,056
|
|
2.967%
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Loans (3.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,000
|
795,000
|
1,210,000
|
|
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.00%, due 10/1/13
|
|
414,375
|
|
793,803
|
|
|
1,208,178
|
|
|
|
|
1,450,000
|
2,570,000
|
4,020,000
|
|
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.70%, due 10/1/14
|
|
1,515,963
|
|
2,686,915
|
|
|
4,202,878
|
|
|
|
|
570,000
|
1,135,000
|
1,705,000
|
|
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.13%, due 1/15/20
|
|
560,138
|
|
1,115,363
|
|
|
1,675,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490,476
|
|
4,596,081
|
|
|
7,086,557
|
|
2.971%
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Parts & Equipment (1.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,290,000
|
2,380,000
|
3,670,000
|
|
Navistar Int'l Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 8.25%, due 11/1/21
|
|
1,322,250
|
|
2,439,500
|
|
|
3,761,750
|
|
1.577%
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive (1.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
315,000
|
485,000
|
|
Ford Holdings, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.38%, due 3/1/20
|
|
160,225
|
|
296,888
|
|
|
457,113
|
|
|
|
|
705,000
|
1,295,000
|
2,000,000
|
|
Ford Holdings, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.30%, due 3/1/30
|
|
648,600
|
|
1,191,400
|
|
|
1,840,000
|
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
505,000
|
780,000
|
|
Ford Motor Co., Senior Unsecured Notes, 9.98%, due 2/15/47
|
|
255,750
|
|
469,650
|
|
|
725,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,575
|
|
1,957,938
|
|
|
3,022,513
|
|
1.267%
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking (9.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,579
|
475,592
|
734,171
|
|
CIT Group, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 7.00%, due 5/1/13 (e)
|
|
241,124
|
|
443,489
|
|
|
684,613
|
|
|
|
|
387,870
|
713,391
|
1,101,261
|
|
CIT Group, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 7.00%, due 5/1/14
|
|
360,234
|
|
662,562
|
|
|
1,022,796
|
|
|
|
|
387,870
|
713,391
|
1,101,261
|
|
CIT Group, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 7.00%, due 5/1/15
|
|
347,143
|
|
638,485
|
|
|
985,628
|
|
|
|
|
741,451
|
1,513,986
|
2,255,437
|
|
CIT Group, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 7.00%, due 5/1/16
|
|
652,476
|
|
1,332,308
|
|
|
1,984,784
|
|
|
|
|
2,340,035
|
4,169,580
|
6,509,615
|
|
CIT Group, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 7.00%, due 5/1/17
|
|
2,029,980
|
|
3,617,111
|
|
|
5,647,091
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
470,000
|
730,000
|
|
GMAC LLC, Senior Unsecured Notes, 0.00%, due 12/1/12
|
|
194,350
|
|
351,325
|
|
|
545,675
|
|
|
|
|
960,000
|
1,655,000
|
2,615,000
|
|
GMAC LLC, Guaranteed Notes, 6.75%, due 12/1/14
|
|
912,000
|
|
1,572,250
|
|
|
2,484,250
|
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
610,000
|
940,000
|
|
GMAC LLC, Senior Unsecured Notes, 0.00%, due 6/15/15
|
|
181,087
|
|
334,737
|
|
|
515,824
|
|
|
|
|
1,345,000
|
2,495,000
|
3,840,000
|
|
GMAC LLC, Subordinated Notes, 8.00%, due 12/31/18
|
|
1,183,600
|
|
2,195,600
|
|
|
3,379,200
|
|
|
|
|
1,015,000
|
1,875,000
|
2,890,000
|
|
GMAC LLC, Guaranteed Notes, 8.00%, due 11/1/31
|
|
913,500
|
|
1,687,500
|
|
|
2,601,000
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
1,180,000
|
1,810,000
|
|
Lloyds Banking Group PLC, Junior Subordinated Notes, 6.27%, due 11/14/16 (u)
|
|
378,000
|
|
708,000
|
|
|
1,086,000
|
|
|
|
|
265,000
|
490,000
|
755,000
|
|
Lloyds Banking Group PLC, Junior Subordinated Notes, Ser. A, 6.41%, due 10/1/35 (u)
|
|
159,000
|
|
294,000
|
|
|
453,000
|
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
350,000
|
540,000
|
|
Lloyds Banking Group PLC, Junior Subordinated Notes, 6.66%, due 5/21/37 (u)
|
|
114,000
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
324,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,666,494
|
|
14,047,367
|
|
|
21,713,861
|
|
9.104%
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building & Construction (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
925,000
|
1,425,000
|
|
Standard Pacific Escrow LLC, Senior Secured Notes, 10.75%, due 9/15/16
|
|
510,000
|
|
943,500
|
|
|
1,453,500
|
|
0.609%
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Materials (3.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,175,000
|
2,170,000
|
3,345,000
|
|
Goodman Global Group, Inc., Senior Discount Notes, 0.00%, due 12/15/14
|
|
666,813
|
|
1,231,475
|
|
|
1,898,288
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
325,000
|
325,000
|
|
Owens Corning, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.00%, due 6/15/19
|
|
0
|
|
362,433
|
|
|
362,433
|
|
|
|
|
1,160,000
|
2,145,000
|
3,305,000
|
|
Ply Gem Industries, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 11.75%, due 6/15/13
|
|
1,160,000
|
|
2,145,000
|
|
|
3,305,000
|
|
|
|
|
560,000
|
1,050,000
|
1,610,000
|
|
USG Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 9.75%, due 8/1/14
|
|
597,800
|
|
1,120,875
|
|
|
1,718,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,424,613
|
|
4,859,783
|
|
|
7,284,396
|
|
3.054%
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals (3.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335,000
|
620,000
|
955,000
|
|
Huntsman Int'l LLC, Guaranteed Notes, 7.88%, due 11/15/14
|
|
327,463
|
|
606,050
|
|
|
933,513
|
|
|
|
|
1,140,000
|
2,115,000
|
3,255,000
|
|
MacDermid, Inc., Senior Subordinated Notes, 9.50%, due 4/15/17
|
|
1,140,000
|
|
2,115,000
|
|
|
3,255,000
|
|
|
|
|
971,000
|
1,804,000
|
2,775,000
|
|
Momentive Performance Materials, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 12.50%, due 6/15/14 (e)
|
|
1,068,100
|
|
1,984,400
|
|
|
3,052,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,535,563
|
|
4,705,450
|
|
|
7,241,013
|
|
3.036%
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, Commercial, Lease Financing (3.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
1,015,000
|
1,565,000
|
|
American General Finance Corp., Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Notes, Ser. H, 5.38%, due 10/1/12
|
|
442,261
|
|
816,173
|
|
|
1,258,434
|
|
|
|
|
1,225,000
|
2,265,000
|
3,490,000
|
|
American General Finance Corp., Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Notes, Ser. I, 5.85%, due 6/1/13
|
|
967,991
|
|
1,789,796
|
|
|
2,757,787
|
|
|
|
|
720,000
|
1,340,000
|
2,060,000
|
|
American General Finance Corp., Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Notes, Ser. I, 5.40%, due 12/1/15
|
|
495,009
|
|
921,266
|
|
|
1,416,275
|
|
|
|
|
1,665,000
|
3,080,000
|
4,745,000
|
|
American General Finance Corp., Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Notes, Ser. J, 6.90%, due 12/15/17
|
|
1,156,099
|
|
2,138,610
|
|
|
3,294,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,061,360
|
|
5,665,845
|
|
|
8,727,205
|
|
3.659%
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Capital Goods (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565,000
|
1,045,000
|
1,610,000
|
|
Mueller Water Products, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 7.38%, due 6/1/17
|
|
522,625
|
|
966,625
|
|
|
1,489,250
|
|
0.624%
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric - Generation (8.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,705,000
|
5,025,000
|
7,730,000
|
|
Dynegy-Roseton Danskammer, Pass-Through Certificates, Ser. B, 7.67%, due 11/8/16
|
|
2,610,325
|
|
4,849,125
|
|
|
7,459,450
|
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
495,000
|
765,000
|
|
Edison Mission Energy, Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.00%, due 5/15/17
|
|
213,300
|
|
391,050
|
|
|
604,350
|
|
|
|
|
310,000
|
570,000
|
880,000
|
|
Edison Mission Energy, Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.20%, due 5/15/19
|
|
234,825
|
|
431,775
|
|
|
666,600
|
|
|
|
|
1,640,000
|
3,070,000
|
4,710,000
|
|
Edison Mission Energy, Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.63%, due 5/15/27
|
|
1,111,100
|
|
2,079,925
|
|
|
3,191,025
|
|
|
|
|
1,649,996
|
4,024,290
|
5,674,286
|
|
Energy Future Holdings Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 11.25%, due 11/1/17
|
|
1,167,372
|
|
2,847,185
|
|
|
4,014,557
|
|
|
|
|
94,900
|
175,200
|
270,100
|
|
Homer City Funding LLC, Senior Secured Notes, 8.14%, due 10/1/19
|
|
93,002
|
|
171,696
|
|
|
264,698
|
|
|
|
|
485,000
|
895,000
|
1,380,000
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 7.38%, due 2/1/16
|
|
485,606
|
|
896,119
|
|
|
1,381,725
|
|
|
|
|
705,000
|
1,305,000
|
2,010,000
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 7.38%, due 1/15/17
|
|
706,763
|
|
1,308,262
|
|
|
2,015,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,622,293
|
|
12,975,137
|
|
|
19,597,430
|
|
8.217%
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronics (1.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
675,000
|
1,035,000
|
|
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.13%, due 12/15/17
|
|
358,650
|
|
672,469
|
|
|
1,031,119
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
725,000
|
1,115,000
|
|
NXP BV Funding LLC, Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes, 3.03%, due 1/15/10 (e)(u)
|
|
323,700
|
|
601,750
|
|
|
925,450
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
1,120,000
|
1,720,000
|
|
NXP BV Funding LLC, Senior Secured Notes, 7.88%, due 10/15/14
|
|
544,500
|
|
1,016,400
|
|
|
1,560,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226,850
|
|
2,290,619
|
|
|
3,517,469
|
|
1.475%
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy - Exploration & Production (2.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
395,000
|
605,000
|
|
Atlas Energy Operating Co. LLC, Guaranteed Notes, 10.75%, due 2/1/18
|
|
232,050
|
|
436,475
|
|
|
668,525
|
|
|
|
|
985,000
|
635,000
|
1,620,000
|
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 9.50%, due 2/15/15
|
|
1,081,038
|
|
696,912
|
|
|
1,777,950
|
|
|
|
|
785,000
|
1,440,000
|
2,225,000
|
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 6.88%, due 1/15/16
|
|
785,000
|
|
1,440,000
|
|
|
2,225,000
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
280,000
|
430,000
|
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 7.25%, due 12/15/18
|
|
151,125
|
|
282,100
|
|
|
433,225
|
|
|
|
|
445,000
|
1,065,000
|
1,510,000
|
|
Cimarex Energy Co., Guaranteed Notes, 7.13%, due 5/1/17
|
|
449,450
|
|
1,075,650
|
|
|
1,525,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,698,663
|
|
3,931,137
|
|
|
6,629,800
|
|
2.780%
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Drug Retailers (1.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
450,000
|
695,000
|
|
Ingles Markets, Inc., Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.88%, due 5/15/17
|
|
254,800
|
|
468,000
|
|
|
722,800
|
|
|
|
|
405,000
|
745,000
|
1,150,000
|
|
Rite Aid Corp., Senior Secured Notes, 9.75%, due 6/12/16
|
|
439,425
|
|
808,325
|
|
|
1,247,750
|
|
|
|
|
575,000
|
1,050,000
|
1,625,000
|
|
Rite Aid Corp., Senior Secured Notes, 10.38%, due 7/15/16
|
|
609,500
|
|
1,113,000
|
|
|
1,722,500
|
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
525,000
|
805,000
|
|
Rite Aid Corp., Senior Secured Notes, 10.25%, due 10/15/19
|
|
295,400
|
|
553,875
|
|
|
849,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599,125
|
|
2,943,200
|
|
|
4,542,325
|
|
1.905%
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forestry/Paper (1.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735,000
|
1,355,000
|
2,090,000
|
|
PE Paper Escrow GmbH, Senior Secured Notes, 12.00%, due 8/1/14
|
|
812,175
|
|
1,497,275
|
|
|
2,309,450
|
|
0.968%
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming (8.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
345,000
|
570,000
|
|
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority, Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.00%, due 11/15/13
|
|
164,250
|
|
251,850
|
|
|
416,100
|
|
|
|
|
725,000
|
1,350,000
|
2,075,000
|
|
FireKeepers Development Authority, Senior Secured Notes, 13.88%, due 5/1/15
|
|
822,875
|
|
1,532,250
|
|
|
2,355,125
|
|
|
|
|
1,855,000
|
3,440,000
|
5,295,000
|
|
Harrah's Operating Co., Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 10.75%, due 2/1/16
|
|
1,511,825
|
|
2,803,600
|
|
|
4,315,425
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
315,000
|
490,000
|
|
MGM Mirage, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 6.75%, due 4/1/13
|
|
150,938
|
|
271,687
|
|
|
422,625
|
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
510,000
|
785,000
|
|
MGM Mirage, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 10.38%, due 5/15/14
|
|
298,375
|
|
553,350
|
|
|
851,725
|
|
|
|
|
470,000
|
875,000
|
1,345,000
|
|
MGM Mirage, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 7.50%, due 6/1/16
|
|
366,600
|
|
682,500
|
|
|
1,049,100
|
|
|
|
|
470,000
|
860,000
|
1,330,000
|
|
MGM Mirage, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 11.13%, due 11/15/17
|
|
520,525
|
|
952,450
|
|
|
1,472,975
|
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
620,000
|
950,000
|
|
Peninsula Gaming LLC, Senior Secured Notes, 8.38%, due 8/15/15
|
|
329,175
|
|
618,450
|
|
|
947,625
|
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
705,000
|
1,080,000
|
|
Peninsula Gaming LLC, Senior Unsecured Notes, 10.75%, due 8/15/17
|
|
376,875
|
|
708,525
|
|
|
1,085,400
|
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
595,000
|
915,000
|
|
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., Senior Notes, 8.63%, due 8/1/17
|
|
326,400
|
|
606,900
|
|
|
933,300
|
|
|
|
|
1,165,000
|
1,781,000
|
2,946,000
|
|
Pokagon Gaming Authority, Senior Notes, 10.38%, due 6/15/14
|
|
1,211,600
|
|
1,852,240
|
|
|
3,063,840
|
|
|
|
|
355,000
|
665,000
|
1,020,000
|
|
San Pasqual Casino Development Group, Inc., Notes, 8.00%, due 9/15/13
|
|
331,925
|
|
621,775
|
|
|
953,700
|
|
|
|
|
595,000
|
1,115,000
|
1,710,000
|
|
Shingle Springs Tribal Gaming Authority, Senior Notes, 9.38%, due 6/15/15
|
|
452,200
|
|
847,400
|
|
|
1,299,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,863,563
|
|
12,302,977
|
|
|
19,166,540
|
|
8.036%
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Distribution (9.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
755,000
|
1,165,000
|
|
AmeriGas Partners L.P., Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.13%, due 5/20/16
|
|
410,000
|
|
755,000
|
|
|
1,165,000
|
|
|
|
|
1,605,000
|
2,985,000
|
4,590,000
|
|
El Paso Energy Corp., Medium-Term Notes, 7.80%, due 8/1/31
|
|
1,511,000
|
|
2,810,178
|
|
|
4,321,178
|
|
|
|
|
776,000
|
1,462,000
|
2,238,000
|
|
Ferrellgas L.P., Senior Unsecured Notes, 6.75%, due 5/1/14
|
|
764,360
|
|
1,440,070
|
|
|
2,204,430
|
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
690,000
|
1,115,000
|
|
Ferrellgas Partners L.P., Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.75%, due 6/15/12
|
|
430,313
|
|
698,625
|
|
|
1,128,938
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
540,000
|
625,000
|
|
Ferrellgas Partners L.P., Senior Unsecured Notes, 6.75%, due 5/1/14
|
|
83,725
|
|
531,900
|
|
|
615,625
|
|
|
|
|
620,000
|
1,155,000
|
1,775,000
|
|
Ferrellgas Partners L.P., Senior Notes, 9.13%, due 10/1/17
|
|
655,650
|
|
1,221,412
|
|
|
1,877,062
|
|
|
|
|
535,000
|
985,000
|
1,520,000
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners L.P., Guaranteed Notes, Ser. B, 6.88%, due 11/1/14
|
|
505,575
|
|
930,825
|
|
|
1,436,400
|
|
|
|
|
395,000
|
980,000
|
1,375,000
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners L.P., Guaranteed Notes, Ser. B, 8.75%, due 4/15/18
|
|
406,850
|
|
1,009,400
|
|
|
1,416,250
|
|
|
|
|
327,000
|
690,000
|
1,017,000
|
|
Regency Energy Partners L.P., Guaranteed Notes, 8.38%, due 12/15/13
|
|
338,445
|
|
714,150
|
|
|
1,052,595
|
|
|
|
|
2,635,000
|
4,900,000
|
7,535,000
|
|
Sabine Pass LNG, L.P., Senior Secured Notes, 7.50%, due 11/30/16
|
|
2,193,638
|
|
4,079,250
|
|
|
6,272,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,299,556
|
|
14,190,810
|
|
|
21,490,366
|
|
9.011%
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Services (7.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
320,000
|
495,000
|
|
Columbia Healthcare Corp., Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.50%, due 12/15/23
|
|
159,905
|
|
292,398
|
|
|
452,303
|
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
520,000
|
800,000
|
|
Columbia/HCA Corp., Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.69%, due 6/15/25
|
|
256,397
|
|
476,165
|
|
|
732,562
|
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
175,000
|
270,000
|
|
Columbia/HCA Corp., Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.05%, due 12/1/27
|
|
81,463
|
|
150,063
|
|
|
231,526
|
|
|
|
|
505,000
|
945,000
|
1,450,000
|
|
HCA, Inc., Secured Notes, 9.13%, due 11/15/14
|
|
532,775
|
|
996,975
|
|
|
1,529,750
|
|
|
|
|
1,115,000
|
2,060,000
|
3,175,000
|
|
HCA, Inc., Secured Notes, 9.25%, due 11/15/16
|
|
1,197,231
|
|
2,211,925
|
|
|
3,409,156
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
320,000
|
495,000
|
|
HCA, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 8.50%, due 4/15/19
|
|
188,563
|
|
344,800
|
|
|
533,363
|
|
|
|
|
1,993,218
|
3,058,150
|
5,051,368
|
|
NMH Holdings, Inc., Senior Unsecured Floating Rate Notes, 6.63%, due 3/15/10 (u)
|
|
1,484,947
|
|
2,278,322
|
|
|
3,763,269
|
|
|
|
|
1,315,000
|
2,320,000
|
3,635,000
|
|
Service Corp. Int'l, Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.50%, due 4/1/27
|
|
1,170,350
|
|
2,064,800
|
|
|
3,235,150
|
|
|
|
|
785,000
|
375,000
|
1,160,000
|
|
Ventas Realty L.P., Guaranteed Notes, Ser. 1, 6.50%, due 6/1/16
|
|
757,525
|
|
361,875
|
|
|
1,119,400
|
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
1,460,000
|
1,665,000
|
|
Ventas Realty L.P., Guaranteed Notes, 6.50%, due 6/1/16
|
|
197,825
|
|
1,408,900
|
|
|
1,606,725
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
235,000
|
365,000
|
|
Ventas Realty L.P., Guaranteed Notes, 6.75%, due 4/1/17
|
|
125,775
|
|
227,362
|
|
|
353,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,152,756
|
|
10,813,585
|
|
|
16,966,341
|
|
7.114%
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery (0.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395,000
|
735,000
|
1,130,000
|
|
Terex Corp., Senior Subordinated Notes, 8.00%, due 11/15/17
|
|
380,188
|
|
707,438
|
|
|
1,087,626
|
|
0.456%
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media - Broadcast (6.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920,000
|
1,680,000
|
2,600,000
|
|
Allbritton Communications Co., Senior Subordinated Notes, 7.75%, due 12/15/12
|
|
905,050
|
|
1,652,700
|
|
|
2,557,750
|
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
580,000
|
895,000
|
|
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., Senior Unsecured Notes, 5.00%, due 3/15/12 (e)
|
|
267,750
|
|
493,000
|
|
|
760,750
|
|
|
|
|
295,000
|
540,000
|
835,000
|
|
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., Senior Unsecured Notes, 5.75%, due 1/15/13
|
|
233,788
|
|
427,950
|
|
|
661,738
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
1,110,000
|
1,710,000
|
|
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 10.75%, due 8/1/16
|
|
471,000
|
|
871,350
|
|
|
1,342,350
|
|
|
|
|
730,000
|
1,670,000
|
2,400,000
|
|
LIN Television Corp., Guaranteed Notes, Ser. B, 6.50%, due 5/15/13
|
|
693,500
|
|
1,586,500
|
|
|
2,280,000
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
1,390,000
|
2,140,000
|
|
Sinclair Television Group, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 9.25%, due 11/1/17
|
|
780,000
|
|
1,445,600
|
|
|
2,225,600
|
|
|
|
|
265,000
|
495,000
|
760,000
|
|
Sirius XM Radio, Inc., Senior Unsecured Notes, 9.63%, due 8/1/13
|
|
263,675
|
|
492,525
|
|
|
756,200
|
|
|
|
|
700,937
|
1,295,837
|
1,996,774
|
|
Umbrella Acquisition, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.75%, due 3/15/15
|
|
614,195
|
|
1,135,477
|
|
|
1,749,672
|
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
1,020,000
|
1,570,000
|
|
Univision Communications, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 12.00%, due 7/1/14
|
|
605,688
|
|
1,123,275
|
|
|
1,728,963
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
685,000
|
1,055,000
|
|
XM Satellite Radio, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 11.25%, due 6/15/13
|
|
397,750
|
|
736,375
|
|
|
1,134,125
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
90,000
|
140,000
|
|
XM Satellite Radio, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 13.00%, due 8/1/13
|
|
54,313
|
|
97,763
|
|
|
152,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,286,709
|
|
10,062,515
|
|
|
15,349,224
|
|
6.436%
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media - Cable (2.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,000
|
870,000
|
1,335,000
|
|
DISH DBS Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 7.88%, due 9/1/19
|
|
487,669
|
|
912,412
|
|
|
1,400,081
|
|
|
|
|
640,000
|
1,185,000
|
1,825,000
|
|
GCI, Inc., Senior Notes, 8.63%, due 11/15/19
|
|
645,600
|
|
1,195,369
|
|
|
1,840,969
|
|
|
|
|
570,000
|
1,035,000
|
1,605,000
|
|
UPC Holding BV, Senior Secured Notes, 9.88%, due 4/15/18
|
|
601,350
|
|
1,091,925
|
|
|
1,693,275
|
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
345,000
|
665,000
|
|
Videotron Ltee, Guaranteed Senior Unsecured Notes, 6.88%, due 1/15/14
|
|
321,600
|
|
346,725
|
|
|
668,325
|
|
|
|
|
160,000
|
140,000
|
300,000
|
|
Videotron Ltee, Guaranteed Notes, 9.13%, due 4/15/18
|
|
176,000
|
|
154,000
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
455,000
|
500,000
|
|
Videotron Ltee, Guaranteed Notes, 9.13%, due 4/15/18
|
|
49,500
|
|
500,500
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
190,000
|
295,000
|
|
Virgin Media Finance PLC, Guaranteed Notes, 9.13%, due 8/15/16
|
|
110,644
|
|
200,213
|
|
|
310,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,392,363
|
|
4,401,144
|
|
|
6,793,507
|
|
2.848%
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media - Services (3.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
600,000
|
925,000
|
|
Nielsen Finance LLC, Guaranteed Notes, 11.50%, due 5/1/16
|
|
363,188
|
|
670,500
|
|
|
1,033,688
|
|
|
|
|
945,000
|
1,760,000
|
2,705,000
|
|
Nielsen Finance LLC, Guaranteed Notes, Step Up, 0.00%/12.50%, due 8/1/16 ^^
|
|
862,313
|
|
1,606,000
|
|
|
2,468,313
|
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
580,000
|
920,000
|
|
The Interpublic Group of Cos., Inc., Senior Unsecured Notes, 10.00%, due 7/15/17
|
|
377,400
|
|
643,800
|
|
|
1,021,200
|
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
750,000
|
940,000
|
|
WMG Acquisition Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 7.38%, due 4/15/14
|
|
183,588
|
|
724,687
|
|
|
908,275
|
|
|
|
|
545,000
|
1,000,000
|
1,545,000
|
|
WMG Acquisition Corp., Senior Secured Notes, 9.50%, due 6/15/16
|
|
583,831
|
|
1,071,250
|
|
|
1,655,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,370,320
|
|
4,716,237
|
|
|
7,086,557
|
|
2.971%
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals/ Mining Excluding Steel (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
410,000
|
630,000
|
|
Arch Coal, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 8.75%, due 8/1/16
|
|
232,650
|
|
433,575
|
|
|
666,225
|
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
0
|
700,000
|
|
Arch Western Finance Corp., 6.75%, due 7/1/13
|
|
694,750
|
|
0
|
|
|
694,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927,400
|
|
433,575
|
|
|
1,360,975
|
|
0.571%
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-Line Insurance (0.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
1,560,000
|
2,410,000
|
|
American Int'l Group, Inc., Junior Subordinated Debentures, 8.18%, due 5/15/38 (u)
|
|
561,000
|
|
1,029,600
|
|
|
1,590,600
|
|
0.667%
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Food & Drug Retailers (3.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
605,000
|
930,000
|
|
Blockbuster, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.00%, due 9/1/12
|
|
185,250
|
|
344,850
|
|
|
530,100
|
|
|
|
|
1,107,000
|
2,054,000
|
3,161,000
|
|
Blockbuster, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 11.75%, due 10/1/14
|
|
1,051,650
|
|
1,951,300
|
|
|
3,002,950
|
|
|
|
|
365,000
|
670,000
|
1,035,000
|
|
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., Guaranteed Unsecured Notes, 7.00%, due 2/15/28
|
|
321,200
|
|
589,600
|
|
|
910,800
|
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
445,000
|
690,000
|
|
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 6.38%, due 3/15/37
|
|
207,025
|
|
376,025
|
|
|
583,050
|
|
|
|
|
585,000
|
1,100,000
|
1,685,000
|
|
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., Senior Guaranteed Notes, 6.90%, due 4/1/29
|
|
514,800
|
|
968,000
|
|
|
1,482,800
|
|
|
|
|
735,000
|
1,355,000
|
2,090,000
|
|
Toys "R" Us Property Co. I LLC, Guaranteed Notes, 10.75%, due 7/15/17
|
|
804,825
|
|
1,483,725
|
|
|
2,288,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084,750
|
|
5,713,500
|
|
|
8,798,250
|
|
3.689%
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging (0.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
195,000
|
300,000
|
|
Berry Plastics Corp., Secured Notes, 8.88%, due 9/15/14
|
|
102,113
|
|
189,638
|
|
|
291,751
|
|
0.122%
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printing & Publishing (2.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,000
|
405,000
|
620,000
|
|
Gannett Co., Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 8.75%, due 11/15/14
|
|
222,525
|
|
419,175
|
|
|
641,700
|
|
|
|
|
565,000
|
1,040,000
|
1,605,000
|
|
Gannett Co., Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.38%, due 11/15/17
|
|
583,363
|
|
1,073,800
|
|
|
1,657,163
|
|
|
|
|
870,000
|
1,610,000
|
2,480,000
|
|
TL Acquisitions, Inc., Senior Notes, 10.50%, due 1/15/15
|
|
831,938
|
|
1,539,563
|
|
|
2,371,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,637,826
|
|
3,032,538
|
|
|
4,670,364
|
|
1.958%
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Management & Development (2.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,000
|
950,000
|
1,615,000
|
|
American Real Estate Partners L.P., Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.13%, due 6/1/12
|
|
678,300
|
|
969,000
|
|
|
1,647,300
|
|
|
|
|
995,000
|
2,125,000
|
3,120,000
|
|
American Real Estate Partners L.P., Guaranteed Notes, 7.13%, due 2/15/13
|
|
1,014,900
|
|
2,167,500
|
|
|
3,182,400
|
|
|
|
|
830,000
|
1,535,000
|
2,365,000
|
|
Realogy Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 10.50%, due 4/15/14
|
|
717,950
|
|
1,327,775
|
|
|
2,045,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411,150
|
|
4,464,275
|
|
|
6,875,425
|
|
2.883%
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurants (0.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
310,000
|
480,000
|
|
NPC Int'l, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.50%, due 5/1/14
|
|
168,300
|
|
306,900
|
|
|
475,200
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
150,000
|
230,000
|
|
OSI Restaurant Partners, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 10.00%, due 6/15/15
|
|
70,600
|
|
132,375
|
|
|
202,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,900
|
|
439,275
|
|
|
678,175
|
|
0.284%
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software/Services (4.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
400,000
|
620,000
|
|
Ceridian Corp., Senior Unsecured Notes, 11.25%, due 11/15/15
|
|
209,825
|
|
381,500
|
|
|
591,325
|
|
|
|
|
602,925
|
1,120,200
|
1,723,125
|
|
Ceridian Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 12.25%, due 11/15/15
|
|
569,764
|
|
1,058,589
|
|
|
1,628,353
|
|
|
|
|
1,843,311
|
3,306,588
|
5,149,899
|
|
First Data Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 10.55%, due 9/24/15
|
|
1,635,938
|
|
2,934,597
|
|
|
4,570,535
|
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
195,000
|
300,000
|
|
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.13%, due 8/15/13
|
|
107,625
|
|
199,875
|
|
|
307,500
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
565,000
|
965,000
|
|
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 10.63%, due 5/15/15
|
|
440,500
|
|
622,206
|
|
|
1,062,706
|
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
1,200,000
|
1,750,000
|
|
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 10.25%, due 8/15/15
|
|
585,750
|
|
1,278,000
|
|
|
1,863,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,549,402
|
|
6,474,767
|
|
|
10,024,169
|
|
4.203%
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel Producers/Products (1.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,090,000
|
1,995,000
|
3,085,000
|
|
Tube City IMS Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 9.75%, due 2/1/15
|
|
1,053,213
|
|
1,927,669
|
|
|
2,980,882
|
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
370,000
|
575,000
|
|
United States Steel Corp., Senior Unsecured Notes, 6.65%, due 6/1/37
|
|
164,919
|
|
297,658
|
|
|
462,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218,132
|
|
2,225,327
|
|
|
3,443,459
|
|
1.444%
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support - Services (4.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
985,000
|
1,935,000
|
|
Cardtronics, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.25%, due 8/15/13
|
|
977,313
|
|
1,013,319
|
|
|
1,990,632
|
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
1,000,000
|
1,115,000
|
|
Cardtronics, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, Ser. B, 9.25%, due 8/15/13
|
|
118,306
|
|
1,028,750
|
|
|
1,147,056
|
|
|
|
|
335,000
|
615,000
|
950,000
|
|
Hertz Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 10.50%, due 1/1/16
|
|
357,613
|
|
656,512
|
|
|
1,014,125
|
|
|
|
|
295,000
|
550,000
|
845,000
|
|
Knowledge Learning Corp., Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 7.75%, due 2/1/15
|
|
283,200
|
|
528,000
|
|
|
811,200
|
|
|
|
|
530,000
|
975,000
|
1,505,000
|
|
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., Senior Notes, 10.25%, due 11/15/19
|
|
531,988
|
|
978,656
|
|
|
1,510,644
|
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
1,250,000
|
1,925,000
|
|
United Rentals N.A., Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 7.75%, due 11/15/13
|
|
634,500
|
|
1,175,000
|
|
|
1,809,500
|
|
|
|
|
740,000
|
1,390,000
|
2,130,000
|
|
United Rentals N.A., Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 10.88%, due 6/15/16
|
|
804,750
|
|
1,511,625
|
|
|
2,316,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,707,670
|
|
6,891,862
|
|
|
10,599,532
|
|
4.444%
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom - Integrated/Services (6.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020,000
|
1,885,000
|
2,905,000
|
|
Citizens Communications Co., Senior Unsecured Notes, 9.00%, due 8/15/31
|
|
1,002,150
|
|
1,852,012
|
|
|
2,854,162
|
|
|
|
|
305,000
|
565,000
|
870,000
|
|
Dycom Investments, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 8.13%, due 10/15/15
|
|
280,600
|
|
519,800
|
|
|
800,400
|
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
780,000
|
1,205,000
|
|
Intelsat Bermuda Ltd., Guaranteed Notes, 11.50%, due 2/4/17
|
|
417,562
|
|
766,350
|
|
|
1,183,912
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
605,000
|
930,000
|
|
Intelsat Jackson Holdings Ltd., Guaranteed Notes, 8.50%, due 11/1/19
|
|
334,750
|
|
623,150
|
|
|
957,900
|
|
|
|
|
310,000
|
575,000
|
885,000
|
|
Intelsat Ltd., Senior Unsecured Notes, 6.50%, due 11/1/13
|
|
290,625
|
|
539,063
|
|
|
829,688
|
|
|
|
|
215,000
|
920,000
|
1,135,000
|
|
Intelsat Subsidiary Holdings Co., Ltd., Guaranteed Notes, 8.50%, due 1/15/13
|
|
219,300
|
|
938,400
|
|
|
1,157,700
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
70,000
|
105,000
|
|
Intelsat Subsidiary Holdings Co., Ltd., Guaranteed Notes, Ser. B, 8.88%, due 1/15/15
|
|
36,050
|
|
72,100
|
|
|
108,150
|
|
|
|
|
290,000
|
30,000
|
320,000
|
|
Intelsat Subsidiary Holdings Co., Ltd., Guaranteed Notes, 8.88%, due 1/15/15
|
|
300,150
|
|
31,050
|
|
|
331,200
|
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
410,000
|
630,000
|
|
Level 3 Financing, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 12.25%, due 3/15/13
|
|
233,200
|
|
434,600
|
|
|
667,800
|
|
|
|
|
440,000
|
800,000
|
1,240,000
|
|
Level 3 Financing, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.25%, due 11/1/14
|
|
415,800
|
|
756,000
|
|
|
1,171,800
|
|
|
|
|
835,000
|
1,540,000
|
2,375,000
|
|
Level 3 Financing, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 8.75%, due 2/15/17
|
|
761,938
|
|
1,405,250
|
|
|
2,167,188
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
0
|
400,000
|
|
Qwest Corp., Senior Unsecured Notes, 7.88%, due 9/1/11
|
|
419,000
|
|
0
|
|
|
419,000
|
|
|
|
|
610,000
|
1,295,000
|
1,905,000
|
|
Qwest Corp., Senior Unsecured Notes, 8.38%, due 5/1/16
|
|
654,225
|
|
1,388,887
|
|
|
2,043,112
|
|
|
|
|
255,000
|
480,000
|
735,000
|
|
Windstream Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 8.13%, due 8/1/13
|
|
264,562
|
|
498,000
|
|
|
762,562
|
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
475,000
|
735,000
|
|
Windstream Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 8.63%, due 8/1/16
|
|
264,550
|
|
483,313
|
|
|
747,863
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
0
|
135,000
|
|
Windstream Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 7.00%, due 3/15/19
|
|
126,225
|
|
0
|
|
|
126,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,020,687
|
|
10,307,975
|
|
|
16,328,662
|
|
6.847%
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom - Wireless (8.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350,000
|
2,500,000
|
3,850,000
|
|
Clearwire Communications LLC, Senior Secured Notes, 12.00%, due 12/1/15
|
|
1,370,250
|
|
2,537,500
|
|
|
3,907,750
|
|
|
|
|
520,000
|
965,000
|
1,485,000
|
|
Cricket Communications, Inc., Senior Secured Notes, 7.75%, due 5/15/16 (e)
|
|
518,700
|
|
962,588
|
|
|
1,481,288
|
|
|
|
|
1,260,000
|
2,335,000
|
3,595,000
|
|
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, 9.25%, due 11/1/14 (e)
|
|
1,275,750
|
|
2,364,187
|
|
|
3,639,937
|
|
|
|
|
445,000
|
820,000
|
1,265,000
|
|
Nextel Communications, Inc., Guaranteed Notes, Ser. E, 6.88%, due 10/31/13
|
|
431,650
|
|
795,400
|
|
|
1,227,050
|
|
|
|
|
3,130,000
|
6,025,000
|
9,155,000
|
|
Sprint Capital Corp., Guaranteed Notes, 6.88%, due 11/15/28
|
|
2,601,810
|
|
5,008,281
|
|
|
7,610,091
|
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
1,010,000
|
1,560,000
|
|
Telesat Canada/Telesat LLC, Senior Unsecured Notes, 11.00%, due 11/1/15
|
|
596,750
|
|
1,095,850
|
|
|
1,692,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,794,910
|
|
12,763,806
|
|
|
19,558,716
|
|
8.201%
|
|
8.2
|
Total Corporate Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $90,797,615, $166,322,926, and $257,120,541, respectively)
|
|
98,035,506
|
|
179,578,308
|
|
|
277,613,814
|
|
116.402%
|
|
116.4
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments (6.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,248,375
|
4,956,641
|
11,205,016
|
|
Neuberger Berman Securities Lending Quality Fund, LLC
|
|
6,373,342
|
|
5,055,774
|
|
|
11,429,116
|
|
|
|
|
1,616,745
|
1,341,587
|
2,958,332
|
|
State Street Institutional Liquid Reserves Fund Institutional Class
|
|
1,616,745
|
|
1,341,587
|
|
|
2,958,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-Term Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $7,990,087, $6,397,361, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$14,387,448, respectively)
|
|
7,990,087
|
|
6,397,361
|
|
|
14,387,448
|
|
6.033%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (148.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $148,260,730, $183,343,976, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$331,604,706, respectively) **
|
|
155,420,773
|
|
198,190,878
|
|
|
353,611,651
|
|
148.267%
|
|
148.3
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, less cash, receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other assets [(36.9%)]
|
|
(39,942,859)
|
|
(47,597,682)
|
(400,000)
|
***
|
(87,940,541)
|
|
-36.87%
|
|
36.9
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation Value of Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares [(11.4%)]
|
|
(14,875,000)
|
|
(12,300,000)
|
|
|
(27,175,000)
|
|
-11.39%
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Assets Applicable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders (100.0%)
|
|
$100,602,914
|
|
$138,293,196
|
($400,000)
|
|
$238,496,110
|
|
100.0%
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
The cost of investments for U.S. federal income tax purposes of the combined fund was $332,852,915. Gross unrealized appreciation of investments was $34,822,207 and gross unrealized depreciation of investments
was $14,063,471, resulting in net unrealized appreciation of $20,758,736, based on cost for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Security did not produce income for the last twelve months.
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
All or a portion of this security is on loan.
|
|
|
(u)
|
|
Floating rate securities are securities whose yields vary with a designated market index or market rate. These
securities are shown at their current rates as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
^^
|
|
Denotes a step-up bond: a zero coupon bond that converts to a fixed rate of interest at a designated future date.
|
|
|
***
|
|
Reflects the effect of estimated reorganization expenses of $400,000.
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Yield Strategies Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
Variable-rate
|
|
Accrued Net
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Payments Made
|
|
Paymens Received
|
|
Interest Receivable
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
Counter Party
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Date
|
|
by the Fund
|
|
by the Fund (1)
|
|
(Payable)
|
|
(Depreciation)
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
Citibank, N.A.
|
|
$ 45,000,000
|
|
1/28/2011
|
|
2.92%
|
|
0.23%
|
|
$(10,072)
|
|
$(1,108,934)
|
|
$(1,119,006)
|
(1) 30 day LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) at December 24, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEUBERGER BERMAN DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined Statements of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuberger Berman
|
|
Opportunity
|
|
High Yield
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
Strategies Fund
|
|
Adjustments
|
1
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at value*+--see Schedule of Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffiliated Issuers
|
$
|
149,047,431
|
$
|
193,135,104
|
|
|
$
|
342,182,535
|
|
Affiliated Issuers
|
|
6,373,342
|
|
5,055,774
|
|
|
|
11,429,116
|
|
|
|
|
155,420,773
|
|
198,190,878
|
|
|
|
353,611,651
|
|
Cash
|
|
-
|
|
99,877
|
|
|
|
99,877
|
|
Deposits with brokers for open swap contracts
|
|
-
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Dividend and interest receivable
|
|
2,330,629
|
|
3,485,534
|
|
|
|
5,816,163
|
|
Receivable for securities sold
|
|
333,194
|
|
99,267
|
|
|
|
432,461
|
|
Receivable for collateral on securities loaned
|
|
657,350
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
657,350
|
|
Receivable for securities lending income-net
|
|
-
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
489,801
|
|
403,164
|
|
|
|
892,965
|
Total Assets
|
|
159,231,747
|
|
203,780,019
|
|
-
|
|
363,011,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
36,700,000
|
|
45,900,000
|
|
|
|
82,600,000
|
|
Due to custodian
|
|
101,938
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
101,938
|
|
Payable for collateral on securities loaned
|
|
6,298,700
|
|
4,987,611
|
|
|
|
11,286,311
|
|
Distributions payable - preferred shares
|
|
3,640
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
Distributions payable - common shares
|
|
108,653
|
|
35,456
|
|
|
|
144,109
|
|
Interest rate swaps, at value
|
|
-
|
|
1,119,006
|
|
|
|
1,119,006
|
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
327,456
|
|
921,031
|
|
|
|
1,248,487
|
|
Payable for securities lending income-net
|
|
6
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Payable to investment manager - net
|
|
52,257
|
|
91,098
|
|
|
|
143,355
|
|
Payable to administrator
|
|
31,864
|
|
8,282
|
|
|
|
40,146
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
1,682
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
3,787
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
127,637
|
|
121,156
|
|
400,000
|
2
|
648,793
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
43,753,833
|
|
53,186,823
|
|
400,000
|
|
97,340,656
|
Perpetual Preferred Shares Series A (595, 492, and 1,087 shares issued and outstanding, respectively) at liquidation value
|
|
14,875,000
|
|
12,300,000
|
|
|
|
27,175,000
|
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders at value
|
$
|
100,602,914
|
$
|
138,293,196
|
|
(400,000)
|
$
|
238,496,110
|
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital - common stock
|
$
|
223,502,927
|
$
|
160,803,923
|
|
|
$
|
384,306,850
|
|
Undistributed net investment income (loss)
|
|
501,181
|
|
608,118
|
|
(400,000)
|
|
709,299
|
|
Accumulated net realized gains (losses) on investments
|
|
(130,561,237)
|
|
(36,856,813)
|
|
|
|
(167,418,050)
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of investments
|
|
7,160,043
|
|
13,737,968
|
|
|
|
20,898,011
|
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders at value
|
$
|
100,602,914
|
$
|
138,293,196
|
|
(400,000)
|
$
|
238,496,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Common Stock Outstanding ($.0001 par value, 999,994,000 shares authorized; and no par value, unlimited shares authorized, respectively)
|
|
14,364,850
|
|
11,029,127
|
|
(6,341,586)
|
3
|
19,052,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Net Asset Value Per Common Share Outstanding
|
$
|
7.00
|
$
|
12.54
|
|
|
$
|
12.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
+Securities on loan, at value
|
$
|
6,168,472
|
$
|
4,888,437
|
|
|
$
|
11,056,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Cost of investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffiliated issuers
|
$
|
141,887,388
|
$
|
178,288,202
|
|
|
$
|
320,175,590
|
|
Affiliated issuers
|
|
6,373,342
|
|
5,055,774
|
|
|
|
11,429,116
|
Total cost of investments
|
$
|
148,260,730
|
$
|
183,343,976
|
|
|
$
|
331,604,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
The adjustments assume that High Yield Strategies Fund has obtained all the stockholder accounts and assets of Income Opportunity Fund Inc..
|
2
|
|
Reflects the effect of estimated reorganization expenses of $400,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Each common stockholder of Income Opportunity Fund Inc. will receive the number of High Yield Strategies Fund common stock equal in dollar
|
|
|
value to that stockholder's common stock of Income Opportunity Fund Inc..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEUBERGER BERMAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuberger Berman
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunity
|
|
High Yield
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
Strategies Fund
|
1
|
Adjustments
|
2
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income - unaffiliated issuers
|
|
$
|
1,928,726
|
|
$ 15,772
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,944,498
|
Interest income - unaffiliated issuers
|
|
|
10,617,943
|
|
19,515,676
|
|
-
|
|
30,133,619
|
Income from investments in affiliated issuers
|
|
7,527
|
|
10,143
|
|
-
|
|
17,670
|
Income from securities loaned - net
|
|
|
29,203
|
|
20,010
|
|
-
|
|
49,213
|
Foreign taxes withheld
|
|
|
(2,994)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(2,994)
|
Total income
|
|
|
12,580,405
|
|
19,561,601
|
|
-
|
|
32,142,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment management fee
|
|
|
822,251
|
|
1,043,667
|
|
-
|
|
1,865,918
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
342,605
|
|
86,971
|
|
(274,084)
|
4
|
155,492
|
Investor service fee
|
|
|
-
|
|
6,600
|
|
-
|
|
6,600
|
Audit fees
|
|
|
103,070
|
|
76,466
|
|
(103,070)
|
3
|
76,466
|
Basic maintenance expense
|
|
|
39,644
|
|
25,417
|
|
(39,644)
|
3
|
25,417
|
Custodian fees
|
|
|
114,595
|
|
98,527
|
|
(59,594)
|
3, 4
|
153,528
|
Trustees' fees and expenses
|
|
|
47,097
|
|
50,113
|
|
(47,097)
|
3
|
50,113
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
6,657
|
|
7,630
|
|
-
|
|
14,287
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
272,615
|
|
258,327
|
|
(213,569)
|
3, 4
|
317,373
|
Stockholder reports
|
|
|
103,316
|
|
99,495
|
|
(61,990)
|
3, 4
|
140,821
|
Stock exchange listing fees
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
25,000
|
|
(23,400)
|
3
|
4,935
|
Stock transfer agent fees
|
|
|
28,599
|
|
28,896
|
|
(28,599)
|
3
|
28,896
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
889,677
|
|
1,216,193
|
|
-
|
|
2,105,870
|
Prepayment expenses
|
|
|
228,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
228,000
|
Tender offer fees
|
|
|
48,851
|
|
22,739
|
|
(48,851)
|
|
22,739
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
28,911
|
|
17,357
|
|
(28,911)
|
3, 4
|
17,357
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
3,079,223
|
|
3,063,398
|
|
(928,809)
|
|
5,213,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment management fee waived
|
|
|
(263,115)
|
|
(55,903)
|
|
219,372
|
4
|
(99,646)
|
Expenses reduced by custodian fee expense offset and
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commission recapture arrangement
|
|
|
(217)
|
|
(174)
|
|
217
|
|
(174)
|
Total net expenses
|
|
|
2,815,891
|
|
3,007,321
|
|
(709,220)
|
|
5,113,993
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
9,764,514
|
|
16,554,280
|
|
709,220
|
|
27,028,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of investment securities of unaffiliated issuers
|
|
(18,049,831)
|
|
(39,877)
|
|
-
|
|
(18,089,708)
|
|
Sales of investment securities of affiliated issuers
|
|
52,708
|
|
68,164
|
|
-
|
|
120,872
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
|
-
|
|
(1,173,621)
|
|
-
|
|
(1,173,621)
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffiliated Investment securities
|
|
|
64,102,452
|
|
58,207,708
|
|
-
|
|
122,310,160
|
|
Affiliated Investment securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
|
-
|
|
448,123
|
|
-
|
|
448,123
|
Net gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
46,105,329
|
|
57,510,497
|
|
-
|
|
103,615,826
|
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders
|
|
|
(570,440)
|
|
(472,605)
|
|
(1,105)
|
5
|
(1,044,150)
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Stockholders resulting from operations
|
$
|
55,299,403
|
|
$ 73,592,172
|
$
|
708,115
|
$
|
129,599,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Assume that the conversion has taken place and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategy Fund Inc. has obtained all the stockholder accounts and assets of Income Opportunity Fund
|
2
|
|
Assume that High Yield Strategies Fund has obtained all the stockholder accounts and assets of Income Opportunity Fund Inc.
|
|
3
|
|
Certain expenses have been reduced due to the elimination of partially duplicative services.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Certain expenses, which are determined on a per trust basis or on a sliding scale based upon net assets, have been adjusted
|
|
|
|
to reflect the combination of High Yield Strategies Fund and Income Opportunity Fund Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
The adjustment assumes that all Income Opportunity Preferred Shareholders transferred to High Yield Strategies
|
|
|
|
|
assuming Preferred rates of High Yield Strategies for the period being represented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc. Pro Forma Notes to Combining