NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS (Form: 485BPOS, Received: 12/30/2013 16:10:30)

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 30, 2013

1933 Act Registration No. 333-122847

1940 Act Registration No. 811-21715

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-1A

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933				[ X ]
	Pre-Effective Amendment No.		[ ]
	Post-Effective Amendment No.	33	[ X ]

and/or
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940				[ X ]
	Amendment No.	35	[ X ]

(Check appropriate box or boxes)

Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

c/o Neuberger Berman Management LLC

605 Third Avenue, 2nd Floor

New York, New York 10158-0180

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 476-8800

Robert Conti

Chief Executive Officer and President

Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds

c/o Neuberger Berman Management LLC

605 Third Avenue, 2 nd Floor

New York, New York 10158-0180

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

With copies to:

Arthur C. Delibert, Esq.

K&L Gates LLP

1601 K Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20006-1600

___________________________________

Approximate Date of Proposed Public Offering: Continuous

It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):

		immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
X		on December 31, 2013 pursuant to paragraph (b)
		60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
		on ____________ pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
		75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
		on ____________ pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)

If appropriate, check the following box:

this post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.

Title of Securities Being Registered: Class R6 shares of Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund.

Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds

CONTENTS OF POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 33 ON FORM N-1A

This Post-Effective Amendment consists of the following papers and documents.

Cover Sheet

Contents of Post-Effective Amendment No. 33 on Form N-1A

Part A – Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund Class R6 Prospectus

Part B – Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund Statement of Additional Information

Part C – Other Information

Signature Pages

Exhibit Index

Exhibits

This registration statement does not affect the registration of any series or any class of a series of the Registrant not included herein.

Neuberger Berman Alternative and Multi-Asset Class Funds

CLASS R6

Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund—NRABX

Prospectus December 31, 2013

These securities, like the securities of all mutual funds, have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Contents

NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE AND MULTI-ASSET CLASS FUNDS

Fund Summary

Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund	2
Descriptions of Certain Practices and Security Types	14
Additional Information about Principal Investment Risks	15
Information about Additional Potential Principal Investment Strategies	26
Information About Risks of Additional Potential Principal Investment Strategies	27
Information about Additional Risks	28
Management of the Fund	29
Financial Highlights	33

Your Investment

Maintaining Your Account	34
Share Prices	36
Distributions and Taxes	37
Market Timing Policy	39
Portfolio Holdings Policy	39
Fund Structure	40

Fund Summary

Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Class R6 Shares (NRABX)

Goal

The Fund seeks capital appreciation with an emphasis on absolute (i.e., positive) returns.

Fees and Expenses

These tables describe the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the Fund.

Shareholder Fees

(fees paid directly from your investment)

None

Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your (investment)
Management fees	1.78
Distribution (12b-1) fees	None
Total other expenses 1	0.91
Other expenses	0.61
Dividend and interest expense on short sales	0.30
Total annual operating expenses	2.69
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement	0.49
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement 2	2.20

Expense Example

The expense example can help you compare costs among mutual funds. The example assumes that you invested $10,000 for the periods shown, that you redeemed all of your shares at the end of those periods, that the Fund earned a hypothetical 5% total return each year, and that the Fund’s expenses were those in the table. Actual performance and expenses may be higher or lower.

	1 Year	3 Years	5 Years	10 Years
Class R6	$223	$688	$1,286	$2,906

1 “Other expenses,” which includes dividend and interest expenses relating to short sales, are based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year. Actual expenses may vary.

2 Neuberger Berman Management LLC (NBM) has contractually undertaken to waive and/or reimburse certain fees and expenses of Class R6 so that the total annual operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend and interest expenses relating to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, if any) are limited to 1.90% of average net assets. This undertaking lasts until 10/31/2016 and may not be terminated during its term without the consent of the Board of Trustees. The Fund has agreed that Class R6 will repay NBM for fees and expenses waived or reimbursed for that class provided that repayment does not cause annual operating expenses to exceed 1.90% of its average net assets. Any such repayment must be made within three years after the year in which NBM incurred the expense.

Portfolio Turnover

The Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over” its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when Fund shares are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in annual operating expenses or in the example, affect the Fund’s performance. For the period from May 15, 2012 (commencement of operations) through October 31, 2012, the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate was 270% of the average value of its portfolio when including securities that were sold short and 213% of the average value of its portfolio when excluding securities that were sold short.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Fund seeks to achieve its goal by allocating its assets to multiple subadvisers that employ a variety of investment strategies. The Portfolio Managers at NB Alternative Investment Management LLC (“NBAIM” or the “Adviser”) are responsible for selecting each subadviser and for determining the amount of Fund assets to allocate to each subadviser. The Portfolio Managers allocate Fund assets to subadvisers whose strategy the Portfolio Managers believe, when combined to form a single portfolio, can provide attractive risk-adjusted returns over the long term.

The Portfolio Managers allocate Fund assets among subadvisers in an effort to provide for overall investment diversification with the aim of decreasing the Fund’s sensitivity to market fluctuations. The Portfolio Managers review a range of qualitative and quantitative factors when determining the allocations to subadvisers, including each subadviser’s investment style and historical performance, and the holdings in the subadviser’s allocated assets.

The investment strategies that the subadvisers will utilize involve the following types of investments: (i) equity securities of companies of any market capitalization throughout the world (including the U.S.), which may include common and preferred

2 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

stocks, convertible securities, rights and warrants to purchase common stock, depositary receipts, real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and partnership interests; (ii) debt securities, which may include debt securities of governments throughout the world (including the U.S.) as well as their agencies and/or instrumentalities, debt securities of corporations throughout the world (including the U.S.), below investment grade debt securities (commonly known as “junk bonds”) and convertible bonds; and (iii) foreign currencies.

The Fund also may use derivatives and primarily may use three categories of derivatives: (i) futures contracts based on indices, currencies and/or U.S. government bonds; (ii) swaps, such as credit default swaps, total return swaps and/or interest rate swaps (including constant maturity swaps); and (iii) call and put options on securities and indices including writing (selling) calls against positions in the portfolio (“covered calls”) or writing (selling) puts on securities and indices. Any of these derivatives may be used in an effort to enhance returns or manage and/or adjust the risk profile of the Fund or the risk of individual positions, except that futures contracts on currencies will primarily be used for hedging purposes. A subadviser may choose not to hedge its positions.

The Portfolio Managers intend to allocate the Fund’s assets among the following strategies:

Long/Short Equity: This strategy takes long and short positions in equity securities issued by companies across all market capitalizations, in both the U.S. and non-U.S. markets based on whether the subadviser believes the securities are likely to increase or decrease in value, respectively. The equity securities in which this strategy may invest include common stock, convertible securities, preferred stock, partnership interests, options, warrants, depositary receipts, REITs and ETFs. Some subadvisers may focus on certain sectors of the market. It is currently anticipated that one subadviser will focus its long/short equity strategy on the health care sector, while others may invest across any sectors they find attractive.

Asset-backed Securities: This strategy takes long and/or short positions in asset-backed securities, including principally those asset-backed securities backed by commercial and residential mortgages, a significant portion of which may be non-agency mortgage-backed securities. The subadviser may also invest in asset-backed securities backed by auto loans, credit card debt, student loans, corporate loans and other collateral. These securities may pay fixed or variable rates of interest. The subadviser will target securities with an estimated average weighted duration of approximately 2-6 years at the time of investment. While the Fund will primarily invest in asset-backed securities listed, traded or dealt in developed markets, it may also invest in securities listed, traded or dealt in other countries, including emerging markets countries.

Event-Driven: These are a broad category of investment strategies based on announced or anticipated events or a series of events and on investing in the securities of companies that could be affected by the occurrence of such events. The types of Event Driven Strategies that the Fund will utilize are:

- Stressed and Distressed Debt: This strategy involves investing in the debt of companies experiencing financial or operational difficulties of the sort that often lead to bankruptcies or corporate reorganizations. The debt securities of these companies generally trade at a substantial discount to par value, which may not always reflect a careful analysis of the companies’ assets or prospects. Subadvisers seek to take advantage of their experience in the bankruptcy process by attempting to take advantage of (1) incorrect valuations by investors between the current price and the subadvisers' estimate of the value of the debt, based in part on the subadvisers' involvement in the bankruptcy process, and (2) price disparities in relation to comparable securities.

- Merger (Risk) Arbitrage: This strategy consists primarily of making investments that the subadviser expects will benefit from the successful completion of a merger or acquisition. The subadviser typically buys the stock of a target company after a merger is announced at a price slightly below the takeover price offered. A profit is made if and when the merger is completed at the offered price or higher. In addition, in stock swap mergers, the subadviser may sell or take a short position in the stock of the acquiring company either to reduce risk or on the theory that if and when the merger is completed, any difference between the price of the target company’s stock and the value of the acquiring company’s stock being exchanged for the target company’s stock will be eliminated. If the subadviser believes an announced or widely anticipated merger is unlikely to be completed, it may take the opposite positions.

3 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Most of the subadvisers invest only in announced transactions but some subadvisers may also invest in anticipation of transactions. It is currently anticipated that the subadvisers will invest in both announced transactions and in anticipation of transactions.

- Equity Restructurings Long/Short: This strategy involves examining companies for the prospect of a variety of potential restructurings. The subadviser takes either a long or a short position in equity securities of companies that are undergoing or have recently completed a restructuring. Typical restructurings may include: selling significant assets or portions of a business, entering new businesses, changes in management, significant changes in corporate policy and/or cost structure, such as altering compensation schemes, emergence from bankruptcy, companies undergoing significant changes due to regulatory changes and other corporate reorganizations, including mergers and acquisitions. Restructurings also may include: holding company arbitrage (i.e., attempting to take advantage of apparent disparities between the prices of a holding company’s stock and the prices of any listed companies it may hold), spin-offs, stub trades, recapitalizations and share buybacks. A subadviser may not focus on all types of restructurings and may focus only on certain types of restructurings.

Capital Structure Arbitrage: This strategy involves establishing long and/or short positions in different securities within a single company’s capital structure (e.g., long senior notes and short subordinated bonds). This type of trading involves the determination by the subadviser that the market is mispricing different classes of securities relative to one another, so the subadviser establishes a short position in the security thought to be overvalued and a long position in the security thought to be undervalued.

The Portfolio Managers may also allocate the Fund’s assets to the following strategy:

Credit Long/Short: This strategy primarily involves taking long and short positions in U.S. dollar denominated fixed-income corporate securities that are below investment grade (commonly called “junk bonds”). Below investment grade securities are defined by the Fund as those debt securities that, at the time of investment, are rated BB or lower by Standard & Poor’s, Ba or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, or comparably rated by at least one independent credit rating agency or, if unrated, deemed by the subadviser to be of comparable quality. The subadviser will take long positions that it believes offer the potential for attractive returns and in the aggregate have the potential to outperform the market, as represented by an appropriate index. The subadviser will take short positions that it believes in the aggregate have the potential to underperform the market, as represented by that same index. The subadviser also may invest in a broad range of investments, including, but not limited to, common stock, preferred stock, convertible debt, loans (including collateralized loan obligations), loan participations, trade claims, non-U.S. securities, private placements and credit default swaps.

The Adviser also may allocate the Fund’s assets to certain additional strategies in the future. For more information about these potential additional strategies, please see the section entitled “Information About Additional Potential Principal Investment Strategies.” There is no assurance that any or all of these additional strategies will be used in the future.

*****

The Portfolio Managers currently intend to allocate assets for each investment strategy to the following subadvisers:

Investment Strategy		Subadviser
Global Equity Long/Short		Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC
Merger Arbitrage		GAMCO Asset Management Inc.
Asset-backed Securities		Good Hill Partners LP
Global Equity Long/Short		Lazard Asset Management LLC
Event Driven		Levin Capital Strategies, L.P.
Event Driven		Loeb Arbitrage Management LP
Credit Long/Short		MacKay Shields LLC
Long/Short Equity		SLS Management, LLC
Stressed and Distressed Credit		Sound Point Capital Management, L.P.
Healthcare Long/Short		Turner Investments, L.P.

4 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Investment Strategy		Subadviser
Event Driven		Visium Asset Management, LP

Based on the Portfolio Managers ongoing evaluation of the subadvisers, they may adjust allocations among subadvisers or make recommendations to the Fund’s Board of Trustees with respect to the hiring, termination or replacement of subadvisers. In recommending new subadvisers to the Fund’s Board of Trustees, the Portfolio Managers consider numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the subadviser’s investment style, the reputation of the subadviser, the depth and experience of its investment team, the demonstrated ability of the subadviser to implement its investment strategy, the consistency of past returns, and the subadviser’s policies and procedures to monitor and take into account risk.

When the Portfolio Managers or a subadviser anticipates adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, or receives large cash inflows, the Fund may temporarily depart from its goal and invest in cash or cash equivalent instruments or leave a significant portion of its assets uninvested for defensive purposes. The Fund currently expects to use money market mutual funds for this purpose. If the Fund does so, it may not achieve its goal. The Adviser retains investment discretion to invest Fund assets directly and may do so for defensive purposes or in the event a subadviser is terminated and a new subadviser has not yet been hired. When the Portfolio Managers are making direct investments for the Fund they will invest primarily in ETFs and affiliated and unaffiliated registered investment companies. The Portfolio Managers may also use put options including purchasing puts on security indices and put spreads on indices (i.e., buying and selling an equal number of puts on the same index with differing strike prices or expiration dates) and futures contracts based on indices for defensive purposes. Doing so could help the Fund avoid losses, but may mean lost opportunities. In addition, different factors could affect the Fund’s performance and the Fund may not achieve its goal.

The Fund may change its goal without shareholder approval, although it does not currently intend to do so.

PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT RISKS

Most of the Fund’s performance depends on what happens in the equity and fixed income markets. The Fund’s use of short sales, derivative instruments and when-issued securities will result in leverage, which amplifies the risks that are associated with these markets. The markets’ behavior is unpredictable, particularly in the short term. There can be no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its goal.

A subadviser may use strategies intended to protect against losses (i.e., hedged strategies), but there is no guarantee that such hedged strategies will be used or, if used, that they will protect against losses, perform better than non-hedged strategies or provide consistent returns.

The actual risk exposure taken by the Fund in its investment program will vary over time, depending on various factors including, but not limited to, the Adviser’s allocation decisions. There can be no guarantee that the Adviser or the subadvisers will be successful in their attempts to manage the risk exposure of the Fund.

The Fund is a mutual fund, not a bank deposit, and is not guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. The value of your investment may fall, sometimes sharply, and you could lose money by investing in the Fund.

The following factors can significantly affect the Fund’s performance:

5 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Market Direction Risk. Since the Fund will typically hold both long and short positions, an investment in the Fund will involve market risks associated with different types of investment decisions than those made for a typical “long only” fund. The Fund’s results will suffer both when there is a general market advance and the Fund holds significant “short” positions, or when there is a general market decline and the Fund holds significant “long” positions. In recent years, the markets have shown considerable volatility from day to day and even in intra-day trading.

In addition, the Fund is classified as non-diversified. As such, the percentage of the Fund’s assets invested in any single issuer or a few issuers is not limited by the Investment Company Act of 1940. Investing a higher percentage of its assets in any one or a few issuers could increase the Fund’s risk of loss and its share price volatility, because the value of its shares would be more susceptible to adverse events affecting those issuers.

Market Capitalization Risk. To the extent the Fund emphasizes small-, mid-, or large-cap stocks, it takes on the associated risks. Compared to small- and mid-cap companies, large-cap companies may be less responsive to changes and opportunities. At times, the stocks of larger companies may lag other types of stocks in performance. The stocks of small- and mid-cap companies are often more volatile and less liquid than the stocks of larger companies and may be more affected than other types of stocks by the underperformance of a sector or during market downturns. Compared to large-cap companies, small- and mid-cap companies may have a shorter history of operations, and may have limited product lines, markets or financial resources.

Sector Risk. To the extent the Fund invests more heavily in particular sectors of the economy, its performance will be especially sensitive to developments that significantly affect those sectors. Individual sectors may move up and down more than the broader market. The industries that constitute a sector may all react in the same way to economic, political or regulatory events.

Short Sale Risk. Short sales involve selling a security the Fund does not own in anticipation that the security’s price will decline. Short sales may help hedge against general market risk to the securities held in the portfolio but theoretically present unlimited risk on an individual stock basis, since the Fund may be required to buy the security sold short at a time when the security has appreciated in value. Because the Fund may invest the proceeds of a short sale, another effect of short selling on the Fund is similar to the effect of leverage, in that it amplifies changes in the Fund’s net asset value (NAV) since it increases the exposure of the Fund to the market.

The Fund may not always be able to close out a short position at a favorable time and price. If the Fund covers its short sale at an unfavorable price, the cover transaction is likely to reduce or eliminate any gain, or cause a loss to the Fund.

When the Fund is selling a security short, it must maintain a segregated account of cash or high-grade securities equal to the margin requirement. As a result, the Fund may maintain high levels of cash or other liquid assets (such as U.S. Treasury bills, money market accounts, repurchase agreements, certificates of deposit, high quality commercial paper and long equity positions). The Fund may utilize borrowings or the collateral obtained from securities lending for this cash.

6 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Event-Driven Strategies Risk. Investing in companies in anticipation of an event carries the risk that the event may not happen or may take considerable time to unfold, it may happen in modified or conditional form, or the market may react differently than expected to the event, in which case the Fund may experience losses. Certain events, such as companies emerging from, or restructuring as a result of, bankruptcy, carry additional risks because of the issuer’s financial fragility and the likelihood that its management has little experience with bankruptcy, and the securities of such companies may be more likely to lose value than the securities of more financially stable companies. In general, event-driven strategies may fail if the subadviser is unable to obtain adequate information about the event or does not properly analyze the information available. The actions of other market participants may also disrupt the events on which the Fund’s strategy depends.

Multi-Manager Risk. Fund performance is dependent upon the success of the Adviser and the subadvisers in implementing the Fund’s investment strategies in pursuit of its goal. To a significant extent, the Fund’s performance will depend on the success of the Adviser’s methodology in allocating the Fund’s assets to subadvisers and its selection and oversight of the subadvisers. The subadvisers’ investment styles may not always be complementary, which could adversely affect the performance of the Fund. Some subadvisers have little experience managing mutual funds which, unlike the hedge funds these managers have been managing, are subject to daily inflows and outflows of investor cash and are subject to certain legal and tax-related restrictions on their investments and operations.

Arbitrage Strategies Risks. Arbitrage strategies involve the risk that underlying relationships between securities in which investment positions are taken may change in an adverse manner or in a manner not anticipated by the subadviser, in which case the Fund may realize losses.

Absolute Return Risk. The Fund’s returns may deviate from overall market returns to a greater degree than other mutual funds that do not employ an absolute return focus. Thus, the Fund might not benefit as much as funds following other strategies during periods of strong market performance. Also, the employment of hedging strategies, if any, in an attempt to mitigate risk may cause the Fund’s returns to be lower than if hedging had not been employed.

Special Situations Risk. The Fund’s use of event-driven and arbitrage strategies will cause it to invest in actual or anticipated special situations – i.e., acquisitions, spin-offs, reorganizations and liquidations, tender offers and bankruptcies. These transactions may not be completed as the subadviser anticipates or may take an excessive amount of time to be completed. They may also be completed on different terms than the subadviser anticipates, resulting in a loss to the Fund. Some special situations are sufficiently uncertain that the Fund may lose its entire investment in the situation.

Derivatives Risk. Derivatives involve risks different from, and in some respects greater than, those associated with more traditional investments. Derivatives can be highly complex, can create investment leverage and may be highly volatile, and the Fund could lose more than the amount it invests. Derivatives may be difficult to value and may at times be highly illiquid, and the Fund may not be able to close out or sell a derivative position at a particular time or at an anticipated price. Recent legislation calls for new regulation of the derivatives markets and could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies. The extent and impact of the regulation are not yet fully known and may not be for some time. New regulation of derivatives may make them more costly, may limit their availability, or may otherwise adversely affect their value or performance.

Counterparty Risk. The Fund’s investments in derivatives involve, in addition to the risks posed by the markets and individual issuers, the risks associated with the Fund’s exposure to its counterparties. The Fund’s investments in the OTC derivatives market introduce counterparty risk due to the possibility that the dealer providing the derivative or other product will fail to timely perform its payment and other obligations. The Fund’s investments in the futures markets also introduce the risk that its futures commission merchant (“FCM”) could default on an obligation set forth in an agreement between the Fund and the FCM, including the FCM’s obligation to return margin posted in connection with the Fund’s futures contracts.

Leverage Risk. Leverage amplifies changes in the Fund’s NAV. Derivative instruments, short positions, securities lending and when-issued securities that the Fund may use create leverage and can result in losses to the Fund that exceed the amount originally invested. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s use of any leverage will be successful and there is no specified

7 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

limit on the amount that the Fund’s investment exposure can exceed its net assets. It is currently expected that the Fund’s investment program will have the effect of leveraging the Fund, sometimes by a significant amount.

Options Risk. The use of options involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. If the subadviser applies a strategy at an inappropriate time or judges market conditions or trends incorrectly, options may lower the Fund’s return. There can be no guarantee that the use of options will increase the Fund’s return or income.

Writing (selling) a call option obligates the Fund to sell the underlying security to a purchaser at a specified price if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund receives a premium when it writes a call option. A call option is “covered” if the Fund simultaneously holds an equivalent position in the security underlying the option. When the Fund writes a covered call option, it assumes the risk that it must sell the underlying security at a price lower than the market price of the security, and it gives up the opportunity to profit from a price increase in the underlying security above the exercise price.

Writing (selling) a put option obligates the Fund to acquire the underlying security from a purchaser of the option at a specified price if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund receives a premium when it writes a put option. When the Fund writes a put option, it assumes the risk that it must purchase the underlying security at a price higher than the market price of the security.

In addition, there may be an imperfect correlation between the movement in prices of options and the securities underlying them and there may at times not be a liquid secondary market for various options.

Convertible Securities Risk. The value of a convertible security typically increases or decreases with the price of the underlying common stock. In general, a convertible security is subject to the risks of stocks (and its price may be as volatile as that of the underlying stock) when the underlying stock’s price is high relative to the conversion price and is subject to the risks of debt securities (and is particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates) when the underlying stock’s price is low relative to the conversion price. Many convertible securities have credit ratings that are below investment grade and are subject to the same risks as an investment in lower-rated debt securities. In addition, because companies that issue convertible securities are often small- or mid-cap companies, to the extent the Fund invests in convertible securities, it will be subject to the risks of investing in these companies.

Foreign Risk. Foreign securities, including those issued by foreign governments, involve risks in addition to those associated with comparable U.S. securities. Additional risks include exposure to less developed or less efficient trading markets; social, political or economic instability; fluctuations in foreign currencies or currency redenomination; potential for default on sovereign debt; nationalization or expropriation of assets; settlement, custodial or other operational risks; and less stringent auditing and legal standards. As a result, foreign securities can fluctuate more widely in price, and may also be less liquid, than comparable U.S. securities. World markets, or those in a particular region, may all react in similar fashion to important economic or political developments. In addition, foreign markets can perform differently than the U.S. market. Following the market turmoil of 2008-2009, some national economies continue to show profound instability, which may in turn affect their international trading and financial partners.

Currency Risk. Currency fluctuations could negatively impact investment gains or add to investment losses.

Currency Transaction Risk. Non-U.S. currency forward contracts, options, swaps, or other derivatives contracts on non-U.S. currencies involve a risk of loss if currency exchange rates move against the Fund. Forward contracts are not guaranteed by an exchange or clearinghouse and a default by the counterparty may result in a loss to the Fund. Governmental authorities may impose credit controls to limit the level of forward trading to the detriment of the Fund. Neither the U.S. Commodities Future Trading Commission nor the U.S. banking authorities regulate forward currency transactions through banks. In respect of such trading, the Fund is subject to the risk of bank failure or the inability of or refusal by a bank to perform with respect to such contracts.

8 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Interest Rate Risk. The Fund’s total return and share price will fluctuate in response to changes in interest rates. Generally, the value of investments with interest rate risk, such as fixed income securities, will move in the direction opposite to movements in interest rates. In general, the longer the maturity or duration of a fixed income security, the greater the effect a change in interest rates could have on the security’s price. Thus, the Fund’s sensitivity to interest rate risk will increase with any increase in the Fund’s overall duration. An increase in interest rates can impact other markets as well. For example, because many investors buy derivatives with borrowed money, an increase in interest rates can cause a decline in those markets. Interest rates have been unusually low in recent years.

Prepayment and Extension Risk. The Fund’s performance could be affected if unexpected interest rate trends cause the Fund’s mortgage- or asset-backed securities to be paid off earlier or later than expected, shortening or lengthening their duration. An increase in market interest rates would likely extend the effective duration of mortgage-backed securities, thereby magnifying the effect of the rate increase on the securities' price.

Call Risk. When interest rates are low, issuers will often repay the obligation underlying a “callable security” early, in which case the Fund may have to reinvest the proceeds in an investment offering a lower yield and may not benefit from any increase in value that might otherwise result from declining interest rates.

Credit Risk. A downgrade or default affecting any of the Fund’s securities could affect the Fund’s performance.

Risks of Interests in Loans. Loans generally are subject to restrictions on transfer, and the Fund may be unable to sell loans at a time when it may otherwise be desirable to do so or may be able to sell them only at prices that are less than what the Fund regards as their fair market value. Loans may be difficult to value. There is a risk that the value of the collateral securing a loan may decline after the Fund invests and that the collateral may not be sufficient to cover the amount owed to the Fund. In the event the borrower defaults, the Fund’s access to the collateral may be limited or delayed by bankruptcy or other insolvency laws. Further, in the event of a default, second lien secured loans will generally be paid only if the value of the collateral is sufficient to satisfy the borrower’s obligations to the first lien secured lenders and even then, the remaining collateral may not be sufficient to cover the amount owed to the Fund. If the Fund acquires a participation interest in a loan, the Fund may not be able to control the exercise of any remedies that the lender would have under the loan and likely would not have any rights against the borrower directly. Loans made to finance highly leveraged corporate acquisitions may be especially vulnerable to adverse changes in economic or market conditions.

Trade Claims Risk. Trade claims generally include claims of suppliers for goods delivered and not paid, claims for unpaid services rendered, claims for contract rejection damages and claims related to litigation. An investment in trade claims is very speculative and carries a high degree of risk. Trade claims are illiquid instruments which generally do not pay interest and are typically unsecured and there can be no guarantee that the debtor will ever be able to satisfy the obligation on the trade claim. Additionally, there can be restrictions on the purchase, sale, and/or transferability of trade claims during all or part of a bankruptcy proceeding.

Distressed Securities Risk. In certain periods, there may be little or no liquidity in the markets for distressed securities or other instruments. The prices of such securities may be subject to periods of abrupt and erratic market movements and above average price volatility and it may be more difficult to value such securities. The Fund may lose a substantial portion or all of its investment in distressed securities or it may be required to accept cash or securities with a value less than the Fund’s original investment.

9 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Risks of Collateralized Loan Obligations (“CLOs”). CLOs issue classes or “tranches” of securities that vary in risk and yield, and may experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, decrease of market value due to collateral defaults and disappearance of subordinate tranches, market anticipation of defaults, and investor aversion to CLO securities as a class. The risks of investing in CLOs depend largely on the type of the underlying loans and the tranche of the CLO in which the Fund invests. In addition, CLOs carry risks including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, credit risk and default risk.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Securities Risk. The Fund may obtain when-issued securities as a result of its investments in restructurings and other special situations. When-issued and delayed-delivery securities can have a leverage-like effect on the Fund, which can increase fluctuations in the Fund’s share price; may cause the Fund to liquidate positions when it may not be advantageous to do so, in order to satisfy its purchase obligations; and are subject to the risk that a counterparty may fail to complete the sale of the security, in which case the Fund may lose the opportunity to purchase or sell the security at the agreed upon price.

REITs and Other Real Estate Companies Risk. REIT and other real estate company securities are subject to, among other risks: declines in property values; defaults by mortgagors or other borrowers and tenants; increases in property taxes and other operating expenses; overbuilding; fluctuations in rental income; changes in interest rates; lack of availability of mortgage funds or financing; extended vacancies of properties; changes in tax and regulatory requirements; losses due to environmental liabilities; or casualty or condemnation losses. REITs also are dependent upon management skills and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, self-liquidation and the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free “pass-through” of income under the federal tax law. REIT and other real estate company securities tend to be small- to mid-cap stocks and are subject to the risks of investing in small- to mid-cap stocks.

ETF Risk. ETFs may trade in the secondary market at prices below the value of their underlying portfolios and may not be liquid. An actively managed ETF’s performance will reflect its adviser’s ability to make investment decisions that are suited to achieving the ETF’s investment objectives. Passively managed ETFs are subject to the risk that they may not replicate the performance of the index tracked by the ETF.

Other Investment Company Risk. Through its investment in ETFs and other investment companies, the Fund is subject to the risks of the investment companies’ investments, as well as to the investment companies’ expenses.

Illiquid Investments Risk. Illiquid investments may be more difficult to purchase or sell at an advantageous price or time, and there is a greater risk that the investments may not be sold for the price at which the Fund is carrying them. The Fund may receive illiquid securities as a result of its investment in certain special situations.

Restricted Securities Risk. Restricted securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to the Fund.

Risk Management. Risk is an essential part of investing. No risk management program can eliminate the Fund’s exposure to adverse events; at best, it can only reduce the possibility that the Fund will be affected by such events, and especially those risks that are not intrinsic to the Fund’s investment program.

10 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

volatility in the financial markets, both domestic and foreign, and in the net asset values of many mutual funds, including to some extent the Fund. Both domestic and international equity and fixed income markets have been experiencing heightened volatility and turmoil. Conditions in the U.S. and many foreign economies have resulted, and may continue to result, in fixed income instruments experiencing unusual liquidity issues, increased price volatility and, in some cases, credit downgrades and increased likelihood of default. These events have reduced the willingness and ability of some lenders to extend credit, and have made it more difficult for borrowers to obtain financing on attractive terms, if at all. As a result, the values of many types of securities have been reduced. In addition, global economies and financial markets are becoming increasingly interconnected, which increases the possibilities that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or region. The severity or duration of adverse economic conditions may also be affected by policy changes made by governments or quasi-governmental organizations. Because the situation in the markets is widespread, it may be difficult to identify both risks and opportunities using past models of the interplay of market forces, or to predict the duration of these market conditions

PERFORMANCE

Performance history will be available for the Fund after the Fund has been in operation for one calendar year. Until that time, visit www.nb.com or call 800-366-6264 for updated performance information. Past performance (before and after taxes) is not a prediction of future results.

INVESTMENT MANAGER AND INVESTMENT ADVISER

Neuberger Berman Management LLC (“NBM”) is the Fund’s investment manager. NB Alternative Investment Management LLC (“NBAIM”) is the Fund’s investment adviser.

SUB-ADVISERS

Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Good Hill Partners LP, Lazard Asset Management LLC, Levin Capital Strategies, L.P., Loeb Arbitrage Management LP, MacKay Shields LLC, SLS Management, LLC, Sound Point Capital Management, L.P., Turner Investments, L.P., and Visium Asset Management, LP are the Fund's subadvisers.

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF THE ADVISER

The Fund is co-managed by David Kupperman, Ph.D.(Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM), Jeff Majit (Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM), Ian Haas (Senior Vice President of NBM and NBAIM), Fred Ingham (Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM), and Eric Weinstein (Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM) since its inception in 2012.

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF THE SUBADVISERS

Each of the Portfolio Managers of the subadvisers has managed the Fund since the Fund’s inception, except Franklin J. Collins IV and Brant Brooks of Good Hill Partners LP who have managed the Fund since May 2013. In addition, Jean-Daniel Malan of Lazard Asset Management LLC has managed the Fund since June 2013. Gideon King, Scott Williams, Blaine Marder, Adam

11 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Weingarten and Brian Anderson of Loeb Arbitrage Management LP have managed the Fund since August 2013. Additionally, Scott Swid of SLS Management, LLC has managed the Fund since November 2013.

Subadviser		Portfolio Managers of the Subadvisers
Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC		Jay Abramson, CEO and Chief Investment Officer
GAMCO Asset Management Inc.		Mario J. Gabelli, CEO and Chief Investment Officer
Good Hill Partners LP		Franklin J. Collins IV, Co-Chief Investment Officer and Managing Partner Brant Brooks, Co-Chief Investment Officer and Partner
Lazard Asset Management LLC		Jean-Daniel Malan, Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst
Levin Capital Strategies, L.P.		Samuel Hendel, Portfolio Manager John A. Levin, Portfolio Manager
Loeb Arbitrage Management LP		Gideon King, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer Scott Williams, Director Blaine Marder, Managing Director Adam Weingarten, Director Brian Anderson, Director
MacKay Shields LLC		Dan Roberts, Senior Managing Director Lou Cohen, Managing Director Michael Kimble, Managing Director Taylor Wagenseil, Managing Director
SLS Management, LLC		Scott Swid, Portfolio Manager, Managing Member and Senior Securities Analyst
Sound Point Capital Management, L.P.		Stephen Ketchum, Managing Partner
Turner Investments, L.P.		Vijay Shankaran, M.D., Ph.D., Senior Portfolio Manager and Global Equity Analyst
Visium Asset Management, LP		Francis Gallagher, Portfolio Manager Peter Drippé, Portfolio Manager

BUYING AND SELLING SHARES

You may purchase, redeem (sell) or exchange shares of the Fund on any day the New York Stock Exchange is open, at the Fund's net asset value per share next determined after your order is accepted. Shares of the Fund generally are available only through investment providers such as banks, brokerage firms, retirement plan administrators, and financial advisers. Contact any investment provider authorized to sell the Fund's shares. See “Maintaining Your Account” in the prospectus for eligibility requirements for purchases of Class R6 shares.

For certain institutional investors, shares of the Fund may be available directly from NBM by regular, first class mail (Neuberger Berman Funds, Boston Service Center, P.O. Box 8403, Boston, MA 02266-8403), by express delivery, registered mail, or certified mail (Neuberger Berman Funds, c/o State Street Bank and Trust Company, 30 Dan Road, Canton, MA 02021), or by wire, fax, telephone, or exchange (call 800-366-6264 for instructions). See “Maintaining Your Account” in the prospectus for eligibility requirements for direct purchases of shares and for instructions on buying and redeeming (selling) shares directly.

The Fund does not impose minimum purchase requirements for Class R6 shares. However, you should contact your investment provider to determine whether it imposes minimum purchase requirements.

12 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

TAX INFORMATION

Except for tax-advantaged retirement plans and accounts and other tax-exempt investors, you will be subject to tax to the extent the Fund makes distributions of ordinary income or net capital gains to you. Although those distributions generally are not taxable to a tax-exempt investor, withdrawals from certain retirement plans and accounts generally are subject to federal income tax.

PAYMENTS TO INVESTMENT PROVIDERS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES

If an investor purchases shares of another class of the Fund through an investment provider or other financial intermediary (such as a bank, brokerage firm, workplace retirement program, or financial adviser), the Fund and/or NBM and/or its affiliates may pay the intermediary for the sale of shares of those other classes of the Fund and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the investment provider or other financial intermediary and its employees to recommend the Fund or that other class over another investment. No such payments are made with respect to Class R6. To the extent the Fund makes such payments with respect to another class, they can come only out of the assets of that other class.

13 Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Descriptions of Certain Practices and Security Types

Derivative Instruments. Derivative instruments are generally financial contracts with a value that is derived from an underlying asset, reference rate, index or event. These instruments may relate to commodities, stocks, bonds, credit, interest rates, currencies or currency exchange rates and related indices. Derivative instruments may also contain leverage to magnify the exposure to the underlying investment. Derivatives may be traded on organized exchanges and clearing houses or CCHs, or in private transactions with other parties in the over the counter (“OTC”) market with a single dealer or a prime broker acting as an intermediary with respect to an executing dealer. Derivative instruments may be used for non-hedging and hedging purposes.

Swaps. Swap agreements are two-party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for periods typically ranging from a few weeks to more than one year. Swap agreements are typically OTC instruments. In a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or instruments, which may be adjusted for an interest factor. There are various types of swaps, including but not limited to, total return swaps, credit default swaps and interest rate swaps.

Credit Default Swaps. In a credit default swap (“CDS”), one party pays the other for, in essence, protection against certain designated credit events that decrease the value of one or more underlying reference obligations. The “buyer” of protection under the CDS is obligated to pay the “seller” a periodic stream of payments over the term of the swap in return for a contingent payment upon the occurrence of a credit event with respect to an underlying reference obligation, typically a bond. A credit event generally means a bankruptcy, failure to pay, a moratorium (with respect to sovereign underliers), obligation acceleration or restructuring. If a credit event occurs, the seller typically must pay the contingent payment to the buyer, which typically is the “par value” of the reference obligation (i.e., full notional value less the recovery rate, which is an estimate of the amount that would be recovered from the reference obligation when the default occurs). The contingent payment may be a cash settlement or physical delivery of the reference obligation in return for payment of the face amount of the obligation. The underlying assets may or may not be owned by a party to the CDS.

Total Return Swaps. Total return swaps (“TRSs”) are contracts in which one party, the total return payer, agrees to make payments during a specified period of the total return of the underlying asset(s), which the parties designate as the underlier of the TRS. The underlier may include securities, baskets of securities, or securities indices. The total return payer makes those payments to the total return receiver in return for receiving a fee for the TRS which is equal to a fixed or floating rate of interest and, typically, a LIBOR-based spread (or the total return from another designated underlying asset(s)). The total return receiver is obligated to pay that fee, plus any spread, in addition to any depreciation on the underlier. The underlying assets may or may not be owned by a party to the TRS.

Interest Rate Swaps. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange by the Fund with another party of interest payments, such as an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments with respect to a notional amount of principal. These swaps are effectuated in the OTC market as of the date of this prospectus, however, it is likely that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) will require that many interest rate swaps must be centrally cleared by CCHs. This process would require the Fund to enter into clearing documentation and post initial and maintenance margin. Constant maturity swaps are a variation of the regular interest rate swap. In a constant maturity swap, the floating interest rate is reset periodically according to the fixed maturity market rate of a product with a duration extending beyond that of the swap’s reset period.

Futures. A futures contract is a standardized agreement to buy or sell a set quantity of an underlying asset at a future date, or to make or receive a cash payment based on the value of a securities index, or some other asset, at a stipulated future date. “Margin” with respect to a futures contract is the amount of assets that must be deposited by the Fund with, or for the benefit of, a futures commission merchant in order to initiate and maintain the position. If the price of the futures contract changes in an adverse way, the Fund may be required to post additional margin.

Covered Call Options. Writing (selling) a call option obligates the Fund to sell the underlying security to a purchaser at a specified price if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund receives a premium when it writes a call option. A call option is “covered” if the Fund simultaneously holds an equivalent position in the security underlying the option. The purpose of writing call options is to hedge (that is, to reduce, at least in part, the effect of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund on the Fund’s NAV) or to earn premium income.

Put Options. Writing (selling) a put option obligates the Fund to acquire the underlying security from a purchaser at a specified price if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund receives a premium when it writes a put option. The purpose of writing put options is to hedge (that is, to reduce, at least in part, the effect of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund on the Fund’s NAV) or to earn premium income.

Short Sales. Short sales involve selling a security the Fund does not own in anticipation that the security’s price will decline. To complete the transaction, the Fund must borrow the stock to make delivery to the buyer. The Fund is then obligated to replace the stock borrowed by purchasing the stock at the market price at the time of replacement. The price at such time may be higher or lower than the price at which the stock was sold by the Fund. If the underlying stock goes up in price during the period the short position is outstanding, the Fund will realize a loss on the transaction. Any loss will be increased by the amount of compensation, interest or dividends and transaction costs the Fund must pay to a lender of the security.

Lower-Rated Debt Securities. Lower-rated debt securities (commonly known as “junk bonds”) typically offer investors higher yields than other fixed income securities. The higher yields are usually justified by the weaker credit profiles of these issuers as compared to investment grade issuers. Lower-rated debt securities include debt obligations of all types issued by U.S. and non-U.S. corporate and governmental entities, including bonds, debentures and notes, loan interests and preferred stocks that have priority over any other class of stock of the entity as to the distribution of assets or the payment of dividends. A lower-rated debt security itself may be convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities, or it may carry with it the right to acquire equity securities evidenced by warrants attached to the security or acquired as part of a unit with the security.

Non-agency mortgage backed securities. Unlike mortgage-related securities issued or guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government or government-sponsored entities, mortgagerelated securities issued by private issuers do not have a government or government-sponsored entity guarantee (but may have other credit enhancement), and may, and frequently do, have less favorable collateral, credit risk or other underwriting characteristics. These securities potentially offer higher interest rates than agency-backed mortgaged-backed securities, but require careful analysis of quality in an effort to protect against risk of non-payment of principal and/or interest.

Additional Information about Principal Investment Risks

This section provides additional information about the Fund’s principal investment risks described in the Fund Summary section.

Market Volatility. Markets are volatile and values of individual securities and other investments can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, economic or other developments that may cause broad changes in market values. Changes in the financial condition of a single issuer can impact a market as a whole. To the extent that the Fund sells a portfolio position before it reaches its market peak, it may miss out on opportunities for better performance. Market volatility may disrupt a subadviser’s investment program if it abruptly changes pricing relationships on which the subadviser was basing an arbitrage strategy. Similarly, it may disrupt event-driven strategies if abrupt changes cause the parties to alter or abandon the event on which a subadviser was basing its investment strategy. Because many investors buy stocks on margin, increases in interest rates generally reduce market prices of equities. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

or when there is a general market decline when the Fund holds significant “long” positions. In recent years, the markets have shown considerable volatility from day to day and even in intra-day trading.

Issuer-Specific Risk. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. The value of an issuer’s securities may deteriorate because of a variety of factors, including disappointing earnings reports by the issuer, unsuccessful products or services, loss of major customers, major litigation against the issuer, or changes in government regulations affecting the issuer or the competitive environment. Certain unanticipated events, such as natural disasters, can have a dramatic adverse effect on the value of an issuer’s securities.

Market Capitalization Risk (Small-, Mid- and Large-Cap Stocks Risk). To the extent the Fund emphasizes small-, mid-, or large-cap stocks, it takes on the associated risks. At any given time, any one of these market capitalizations may be out of favor with investors. Compared to small- and mid-cap companies, large-cap companies may be less responsive to changes and opportunities, but their returns have sometimes led those of smaller companies, often with lower volatility. The stocks of small- and mid-cap companies may fluctuate more widely in price than the market as a whole, may be difficult to sell when the economy is not robust or during market downturns, and may be more affected than other types of stocks by the underperformance of a sector or during market downturns. In addition, compared to large-cap companies, small- and mid-cap companies may depend on a more limited management group, may have a shorter history of operations, and may have limited product lines, markets or financial resources. There may also be less trading in small- or mid-cap stocks, which means that buy and sell transactions in those stocks could have a larger impact on a stock’s price than is the case with large-cap stocks.

Sector Risk. The Fund’s investing approach may dictate an emphasis on certain sectors, industries, or sub-sectors of the market at any given time. To the extent the Fund invests more heavily in one sector, industry, or sub-sector of the market, it thereby presents a more concentrated risk and its performance will be especially sensitive to developments that significantly affect those sectors, industries, or sub-sectors. In addition, the value of the Fund’s shares may change at different rates compared to the value of shares of a fund with investments in a more diversified mix of sectors and industries. An individual sector, industry, or sub-sector of the market may have above-average performance during particular periods, but may also move up and down more than the broader market. The industries that constitute a sector may all react in the same way to economic, political or regulatory events. The Fund’s performance could also be affected if the sectors, industries, or sub-sectors do not perform as expected. Alternatively, the lack of exposure to one or more sectors or industries may adversely affect performance.

Because one subadviser invests primarily in securities of companies in the health care sector, the Fund’s performance may be adversely affected by a downturn in that sector. Health care companies can be adversely affected by, among other things, legislative or regulatory changes, competitive challenges, government approval or non-approval of products and services, and product obsolescence. They are also sensitive to political trends, actual and perceived, that may presage legislative or regulatory changes. Moreover, liability for products that are later alleged to be harmful or unsafe may be substantial, and may have a significant impact on the health care company’s market value and/or share price. Biotechnology and related companies can be adversely affected by, among other things, patent considerations, intense competition, rapid technology change and obsolescence, and regulatory requirements of various federal and state agencies. In addition, some of these companies are relatively small and may have thinly traded securities, may not yet offer products or may offer a single product, and may have persistent losses during a new product’s transition from development to production, or erratic revenue patterns. The stock prices of these companies may be very volatile, particularly when their products are up for regulatory approval and/or under regulatory scrutiny.

Short Sale Risk. Short sales involve selling a security the Fund does not own in anticipation that the security’s price will decline. To complete the transaction, the Fund must borrow the stock to make delivery to the buyer. The Fund is then

obligated to replace the stock borrowed by purchasing the stock at the market price at the time of replacement. The price at such time may be higher or lower than the price at which the stock was sold by the Fund. If the underlying stock goes up in price during the period during which the short position is outstanding, the Fund will realize a loss on the transaction. Any loss will be increased by the amount of compensation, interest or dividends and transaction costs the Fund must pay to a lender of the security.

Short sales may help hedge against general market risk to the securities held in the portfolio but theoretically present unlimited risk on an individual stock basis, since the Fund may be required to buy the security sold short at a time when the security has appreciated in value, and there is potentially no limit to the amount of such appreciation. Because the Fund may invest the proceeds of a short sale, another effect of short selling on the Fund is similar to the effect of leverage, in that it amplifies changes in the Fund’s NAV since it increases the exposure of the Fund to the market and may increase losses and the volatility of returns.

The Fund may not always be able to close out a short position at a favorable time or price. A lender may request that borrowed securities be returned to it on short notice, and the Fund may have to buy the borrowed securities at an unfavorable price, which will potentially reduce or eliminate any gain or cause a loss for the Fund.

When the Fund is selling stocks short, it must maintain a segregated account of cash or high-grade securities equal to the margin requirement. As a result, the Fund may maintain high levels of cash or liquid assets (such as U.S. Treasury bills, money market accounts, repurchase agreements, certificates of deposit, high quality commercial paper and long equity positions), or may utilize borrowings or the collateral obtained from securities lending for this cash.

Event-Driven Strategies Risk. Investing in companies in anticipation of an event carries the risk that the event may not happen or may take considerable time to unfold, it may happen in modified or conditional form, or the market may react differently than expected to the event, in which case the Fund may experience losses. Furthermore, an event, such as a pending restructuring or spin-off, may be renegotiated, terminated or involve a longer time frame than originally contemplated, in which case the Fund may experience losses. In addition, certain events, such as companies emerging from bankruptcy or restructurings resulting from bankruptcy, carry additional risks because of the issuer’s financial fragility and the likelihood that its management has little experience with bankruptcy, and the securities of such companies may be more likely to lose value than the securities of more financially stable companies. It also may be difficult to obtain complete financial information about companies involved in certain situations. In general, event-driven strategies may fail if the subadviser is unable to obtain adequate information about the event or does not properly analyze the information available. The actions of other market participants may also disrupt the events on which the Fund’s strategy depends.

Multi-Manager Risk. Fund performance is dependent upon the success of the Adviser and the subadvisers in implementing the Fund’s investment strategy in pursuit of its objective. To a significant extent, the Fund’s performance will depend on the success of the Adviser in allocating the Fund’s assets to subadvisers and its selection and oversight of the subadvisers. The subadvisers’ investment styles may not always be complementary, which could adversely affect the performance of the Fund. A subadviser’s strategy may be out of favor at any time. In addition, because each subadviser makes its trading decisions independently, it is possible that the subadvisers may purchase or sell the same security at the same time without aggregating their transactions or hold long and short positions in the same security at the same time. This may cause unnecessary brokerage and other expenses and the Fund may incur losses as a result. Some subadvisers have little experience managing registered investment companies which, unlike the hedge funds these subadvisers have been managing, are subject to daily inflows and outflows of investor cash and are subject to certain legal and tax-related restrictions on their investments or operations.

Absolute Return Risk. The Fund’s returns may deviate from overall market returns to a greater degree than other mutual funds that do not employ an absolute return focus. Thus, the Fund might not benefit as much as funds following other strategies during periods of strong market performance. Also, the employment of hedging strategies, if any, to mitigate risk may cause the Fund’s returns to be lower than if hedging had not been employed. Investment strategies and subadvisers whose

performance has historically been non-correlated or demonstrated low correlations to one another or to major world financial market indices may become correlated at certain times. During these circumstances, absolute return strategies may cease to function as anticipated.

Derivatives Risk. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, changes in the value of one or more underlying assets, reference rates, indexes or events. The Fund’s use of derivatives – such as swaps, futures or options – involves risks different from, and in some respects greater than, the risks associated with investing in more traditional investments, such as stocks and bonds. Derivatives can be highly complex and may perform in ways unanticipated by the Fund’s Adviser or subadviser. The Fund’s use of derivatives involves the risk that the other party to the derivative contract will fail to make required payments or otherwise to comply with the terms of the contract. Derivatives can create investment leverage and may be highly volatile, and the Fund could lose more than the amount it invests. Derivatives may be difficult to value and may at times be highly illiquid, and the Fund may not be able to close out or sell a derivative position at a particular time or at an anticipated price. Assets segregated to cover these transactions may decline in value and are not available to meet redemptions. The Fund’s use of derivatives may increase the amount and affect the timing and character of taxable distributions payable to shareholders. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. There can be no assurance that the Fund will engage in derivative transactions to reduce exposure to other risks when that might be beneficial.

The Fund may be required to enter into derivatives transactions via exchanges and CCHs. Because the Fund is not a member of a CCH, if the Fund is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or the CFTC to centrally clear a derivative, the Fund would need to enter into clearing documentation with a member of a CCH, a process that would introduce counterparty risk to the Fund, which is described in greater detail below. While unlikely, the Fund would also be exposed to the risk that a CCH could experience financial difficulty that would result in losses to the Fund in the event that the prudential measures taken by the CCH are insufficient.

The Fund will likely be required to segregate assets to cover its obligations relating to its purchase of derivative instruments in a manner that satisfies contractual undertakings and regulatory requirements with respect to the derivatives. The Fund will set aside liquid assets in an amount equal to the Fund’s daily marked-to-market net obligation (i.e., the Fund’s daily net liability) under futures contracts that are contractually required to cash settle. For futures contracts that are not contractually required to cash settle, the Fund must set aside liquid assets equal to such contracts’ full notional value (generally, the total numerical value of the asset underlying a future contract at the time of valuation) while the positions are open. By setting aside assets equal to only its net obligations under cash-settled futures contracts, the Fund may use derivatives to a greater extent than if the Fund were required to segregate assets equal to the full notional value of such contracts, which may create an effect on the Fund similar to leverage.

Futures. There can be no assurance that, at all times, a liquid market will exist for offsetting a futures contract that the Fund has previously bought or sold. This could be the case if, for example, a futures price has increased or decreased by the maximum allowable daily limit and there is no buyer willing to purchase the futures contract that the Fund needs to sell (or sell the futures contract that the Fund needs to buy).

Credit Default Swaps. The Fund may be either the buyer or seller in a CDS. If the Fund is a buyer and no credit event occurs, the Fund would lose its investment (or premium) and recover nothing. If a credit event occurs, however, the buyer typically receives full notional value less the recovery rate for a reference obligation that may have little or no value. As a seller, the Fund receives a fixed rate of income throughout the term of the contract, which typically is between one month and five years, provided that no credit event occurs. If a credit event occurs and the Fund is the seller, it would be required to pay the buyer the full notional value less the recovery rate of the reference obligation, which is an estimate of the amount that would be recovered from the reference obligation when the default occurs.

The CDS industry has streamlined the settlement of CDS upon the occurrence of a credit event using an auction mechanism. Although this has streamlined the settlement of CDS, this has also had the effect of reducing, but not eliminating altogether, the recovery rate with respect to a reference obligation following a credit event.

Total Return Swaps. TRSs may be used to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or market. TRSs may effectively add leverage to the Fund’s portfolio because, in addition to its net assets, the Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. If the Fund is the total return receiver in a TRS, then the credit risk for an underlying asset is transferred to the Fund in exchange for its receipt of the return (appreciation) on that asset. If the Fund is the total return payer, it is hedging the downside risk of an underlying asset but it is obligated to pay the amount of any appreciation on that asset.

Interest Rate Swaps . The Fund may enter into an interest rate swap in order to protect against declines in the value of fixed income securities held by the Fund. In such an instance, the Fund may agree with a counterparty to pay a fixed rate (multiplied by a notional amount) and the counterparty to pay a floating rate multiplied by the same notional amount. If long-term interest rates rise, resulting in a diminution in the value of the Fund’s portfolio, the Fund would receive payments under the swap that would offset, in whole or in part, such diminution in value; if interest rates fall, the Fund would likely lose money on the swap transaction. The Fund may also enter into constant maturity swaps, which are a variation of the regular interest rate swap. Constant maturity swaps are exposed to changes in long-term interest rate movements.

Options. The use of options involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. While the Fund’s use of these instruments may reduce certain risks associated with owning its portfolio securities, these instruments themselves involve certain other risks. If the subadviser applies a strategy at an inappropriate time or judges market conditions or trends incorrectly, options may lower the Fund’s return. There can be no guarantee that the use of options will increase the Fund’s return or income.

When the Fund writes a covered call option, it assumes the risk that it must sell the underlying security at a price that may be lower than the market price of the security, and it gives up the opportunity to profit from a price increase in the underlying security above the exercise price. If a call option that the Fund has written is exercised, the Fund will experience a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security. If a call option that the Fund has written expires unexercised, the Fund will experience a gain in the amount of the premium; however, that gain may be offset by a decline in the market value of the underlying security during the option period.

When the Fund writes a put option, it assumes the risk that it must purchase the underlying security at a price that may be higher than the market price of the security. If the price of the underlying security declines, the Fund would expect to suffer a loss. However, the premium the Fund received for writing the put should offset a portion of the decline.

Counterparty Risk. There are two separate categories of counterparty risk that arise out of the Fund’s investments in derivatives. The first relates to the risk that its swap counterparty defaults, and the second category relates to the risk that a futures commission merchant (“FCM”) would default on an obligation set forth in an agreement between the Fund and the FCM. As for the first category of risk, entering into derivatives in the OTC market introduces counterparty risk, which is the risk that (a) the dealer providing the derivative or other product will fail to timely perform its payment and other obligations, completely breach its performance obligations or experience financial difficulties, which may include filing for bankruptcy; and (b) the dealer will dispose of Fund collateral that the Fund posted to secure its OTC positions with the defaulting swaps dealer. Therefore, to the extent that the Fund engages in trading in OTC markets, the Fund could be exposed to greater risk of loss through default than if it confined its trading to regulated exchanges. The second category of risk exists at and from the time that the Fund enters into a contractual arrangement with its FCM to bring about the settlement and clearing of futures contracts. The FCM may hold margin posted in connection with those contracts and that margin may be rehypothecated (or re-pledged) by the FCM and lost or its return delayed due to a default by the FCM or other customer of the FCM. The FCM may

itself file for bankruptcy, which would either delay the return of, or jeopardize altogether the assets posted by the FCM as margin in response to margin calls relating to futures positions.

Recent Changes in the Law Governing Derivatives. Recent legislation requires the SEC and the CFTC to establish new rules governing the derivatives markets. The extent and impact of the regulation are not yet fully known and may not be for some time. New regulation of derivatives may make them more costly, may limit their availability, or may otherwise adversely affect their value or performance. In addition to other changes, these rules are expected to provide for central clearing of some derivatives that in the past were exclusively traded OTC, and may increase costs and margin requirements but are expected to reduce certain counterparty risks.

Leverage Risk. Leverage creates an opportunity for increased total return but, at the same time, creates special risk considerations. Leverage amplifies changes in the Fund’s NAV. The Fund’s use of when-issued and delayed-delivery securities, derivative instruments, short positions and securities lending creates leverage and can result in losses to the Fund that exceed the amount originally invested. There is no specified limit on the amount that the Fund’s investment exposure can exceed its net assets. Because of leverage, the Fund’s investment exposure may exceed the Fund’s net assets by a significant amount.

Convertible Securities Risk. The value of a convertible security increases or decreases with the price of the underlying common stock. In general, a convertible security is subject to the risks of stocks when the underlying stock’s price is high relative to the conversion price and is subject to the risks of debt securities when the underlying stock’s price is low relative to the conversion price. Convertible securities generally have less potential for gain or loss than common stocks. Securities that are convertible other than at the option of the holder generally do not limit the potential for loss to the same extent as securities that are convertible at the option of the holder.

Many convertible securities have credit ratings that are below investment grade and are subject to the same risks as an investment in lower-rated debt securities. The credit rating of a company’s convertible securities is generally lower than that of its non-convertible debt securities. Convertible securities are normally considered “junior” securities — that is, the company usually must pay interest on its non-convertible debt securities before it can make payments on its convertible securities. If the issuer stops making interest or principal payments, convertible securities may become worthless and a Fund could lose its entire investment. Because companies that issue convertible securities are often small- or mid-cap companies, to the extent a Fund invests in convertible securities, it will often be subject to the risks of investing in these companies.

Foreign Risk. Foreign securities, including those issued by foreign governments, involve risks in addition to those associated with comparable U.S. securities. Additional risks include exposure to less developed or less efficient trading markets; social, political or economic instability; fluctuations in foreign currencies or currency redenomination; potential for default on sovereign debt; nationalization or expropriation of assets; settlement, custodial or other operational risks; and less stringent auditing and legal standards. In addition, key information about the issuer, the markets or the local government or economy may be unavailable, incomplete or inaccurate. As a result, foreign securities can fluctuate more widely in price, and may also be less liquid, than comparable U.S. securities. Although foreign securities offer added diversification potential, world markets, or those in a particular region, may all react in similar fashion to important economic or political developments. Securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations can involve additional risks relating to conditions in foreign countries.

In addition, foreign markets can perform differently than the U.S. market. Over a given period of time, foreign securities may underperform U.S. securities—sometimes for years. The Fund could also underperform if the subadviser invests in countries or regions whose economic performance falls short. To the extent that the Fund invests a portion of its assets in one country, state, region or currency, an adverse economic, business or political development may affect the value of the Fund’s investments more than if its investments were not so invested. The effect of recent, worldwide economic instability on specific foreign markets or issuers may be difficult to predict or evaluate. Some national economies continue to show profound instability, which may in turn affect their international trading partners or other members of their currency bloc.

Investing in foreign securities may also involve a greater risk for excessive trading due to “time-zone arbitrage.” If an event occurring after the close of a foreign market, but before the time the Fund computes its current net asset value, causes a change in the price of the foreign securities and such price is not reflected in the Fund’s current net asset value, investors may attempt to take advantage of anticipated price movements in securities held by the Fund based on such pricing discrepancies.

Currency Risk . To the extent that the Fund invests in securities or other instruments denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, changes in currency exchange rates bring an added dimension of risk. Currency fluctuations could negatively impact investment gains or add to investment losses.

Currency Transaction Risks. Non-U.S. currency forward contracts, options, swaps, or other derivatives contracts on non-U.S. currencies involve a risk of loss if currency exchange rates move against the Fund. Forward contracts are not guaranteed by an exchange or clearinghouse and a default by the forward contract counterparty may result in a loss to the Fund of the value of unrealized profits on the contract. There are no limitations on daily price movements of forward contracts. The imposition of credit controls by governmental authorities might limit the level of such forward trading to less than that which the Portfolio Manager or a subadviser would otherwise recommend, to the possible detriment of the Fund. Neither the CFTC nor the U.S. banking authorities regulate forward currency transactions through banks. It is contemplated that most non-U.S. currency forward contracts will be with banks. In respect of such trading, the Fund is subject to the risk of bank failure or the inability of or refusal by a bank to perform with respect to such contracts. Banks are not required to continue to make markets in currencies. There have been periods during which certain banks have refused to continue to quote prices for forward contracts or have quoted prices with an unusually wide spread (the difference between the price at which the bank is prepared to buy and that at which it is prepared to sell).

Interest Rate Risk. In general, the value of the Fund’s investments with interest rate risk, such as fixed income securities, will move in the direction opposite to movements in interest rates. Debt securities have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. In general, the longer the maturity or duration of a debt security, the greater the effect a change in interest rates could have on the security’s price. Thus, the Fund’s sensitivity to interest rate risk will increase with any increase in the overall duration of the portion of the Fund invested in fixed income securities. Short-term securities tend to react to changes in short-term interest rates, and long-term securities tend to react to changes in long-term interest rates. The link between interest rates and debt security prices tends to be weaker with lower-rated debt securities than with investment grade debt securities. An increase in interest rates can impact other markets as well. For example, because many investors buy derivatives with borrowed money, an increase in interest rates can cause a decline in those markets. A rate increase can also have a positive impact on other markets if, for example, it is taken by investors as a sign that the economy is improving. Interest rates have been unusually low in recent years.

Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk that issuers may fail, or become less able, to make interest and/or principal payments on debt securities when due. Changes in the actual or perceived creditworthiness of an issuer, factors affecting an issuer directly (such as management changes, labor relations, collapse of key suppliers or customers, or material changes in overhead), factors affecting the industry in which a particular issuer operates (such as competition or technological advances) and changes in general social, economic or political conditions can increase the risk of default by an issuer, which can affect a security’s credit quality or value. Entities providing credit or liquidity support also can be affected by these types of changes.

In the wake of the financial crisis, some credit rating agencies have begun applying more stringent criteria, with the result that some securities are being downgraded. A downgrade or default affecting any of the Fund’s securities could affect the Fund’s performance. In addition, a rating may become stale in that it fails to reflect changes in an issuer’s financial condition. Ratings represent the rating agency’s opinion regarding the quality of the security and are not a guarantee of quality.

Lower-Rated Debt Securities Risk. Lower-rated debt securities (commonly known as “junk bonds”) involve greater risks than investment grade debt securities. Lower-rated debt securities may fluctuate more widely in price and yield than investment grade debt securities and may fall in price during times when the economy is weak or is expected to become weak. Lower-rated debt securities also may require a greater degree of judgment to establish a price, may be difficult to sell at the time and price the Fund desires, and may carry higher transaction costs. Lower-rated debt securities are considered by the major rating agencies to be predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to meet principal and interest payments and carry a greater risk that the issuer of such securities will default in the timely payment of principal and interest. Issuers of securities that are in default may fail to resume principal or interest payments, in which case the Fund may lose its entire investment. Lower-rated debt securities are susceptible to such a default or decline in market value due to real or perceived adverse economic and business developments relating to the issuer, the industry in general, market interest rates and market liquidity. The market value of these securities can be volatile. Ratings of a security may not accurately reflect the actual credit risk associated with such a security.

Prepayment and Extension Risk. Due to a decline in interest rates or an excess in cash flow, borrowers may pay back principal before the scheduled due date. To the extent that the Fund invests in mortgage- or asset-backed securities, the Fund’s performance could be affected if unexpected interest rate trends cause these securities to be paid off earlier or later than expected, shortening or lengthening their duration.When interest rates fall, many mortgages are refinanced, and mortgage backed securities may be repaid early. As a result, a Fund may have to reinvest the proceeds in an investment offering a lower yield, may not benefit from any increase in value that might otherwise result from declining interest rates and may lose any premium it paid to acquire the security. Higher interest rates generally result in slower payoffs, which effectively increase duration, heighten interest rate risk, and increase the potential for price declines. The prices of variable and floating rate securities (including loans) can be less sensitive to prepayment risk.

Risks of Interests in Loans. Loans generally are subject to restrictions on transfer, and only limited opportunities may exist to sell loan interests in secondary markets. As a result, the Fund may be unable to sell loans at a time when it may otherwise be desirable to do so or may be able to sell them only at prices that are less than what the Fund regards as their fair market value. Market bids may be unavailable for loans from time to time, and the Fund may find it difficult to establish a fair value for loans held by it.

Senior secured loans are secured by collateral and generally are subject to restrictive covenants in favor of the lenders or security holders, including the Fund, that invest in them. In most loan agreements there is no formal requirement to pledge additional collateral. Therefore, there is a risk that the value of the collateral may decline after the Fund invests and that the collateral may not be sufficient to cover the amount owed to the Fund. In the event the borrower defaults, the Fund’s access to the collateral may be limited or delayed by bankruptcy or other insolvency laws. Further, in the event of a default, second lien secured loans will generally be paid only if the value of the collateral is sufficient to satisfy the borrower’s obligations to the first lien secured lenders and even then, the remaining collateral may not be sufficient to cover the amount owed to the Fund. In addition, if a secured loan is foreclosed, the Fund would likely bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral, including the risk that collateral may be difficult to sell.

If the Fund acquires a participation interest in a loan, the Fund may not be able to control the exercise of any remedies that the lender would have under the loan. In addition, the Fund normally will have to rely on the participating lender to demand and receive payments in respect of the loans, and to pay those amounts on to the Fund; the Fund will be subject to the risk that the lender may be unwilling or unable to do so. In such a case, the Fund likely would not have any rights against the borrower directly. Many banks have been weakened by the recent financial crisis and it may be difficult for the Fund to obtain an accurate picture of a lending bank’s financial condition.

Loan interests may not be considered “securities,” and purchasers, such as the Fund, therefore may not be entitled to rely on the strong anti-fraud protections of the federal securities laws.

Loans in which the Fund may invest may be made to finance highly leveraged corporate transactions. The highly leveraged capital structure of the borrowers in such transactions may make such loans especially vulnerable to adverse changes in economic or market conditions. In addition, bank loan interests may be unrated, and the Fund’s Portfolio Managers or subadvisers may be required to rely exclusively on their analysis of the borrower in determining whether to acquire, or to continue to hold, a loan.

Trade Claims Risks. Trade claims generally include claims of suppliers for goods delivered and not paid, claims for unpaid services rendered, claims for contract rejection damages and claims related to litigation. An investment in trade claims is very speculative and carries a high degree of risk. Trade claims are illiquid instruments which generally do not pay interest and there can be no guarantee that the debtor will ever be able to satisfy the obligation on the trade claim. Additionally, there can be restrictions on the purchase, sale, and/or transferability of trade claims during all or part of a bankruptcy proceeding. Trade claims may not be considered “securities,” and purchasers, such as the Fund, therefore may not be entitled to rely on the strong anti-fraud protections of the federal securities laws.

Trade claims are typically unsecured and may be subordinated to other unsecured obligations of a debtor, and generally are subject to defenses of the debtor with respect to the underlying transaction giving rise to the trade claim. Although the Fund’s Portfolio Managers or subadvisers endeavor to protect against such risks in connection with the evaluation and purchase of claims, trade claims are subject to risks not generally associated with standardized securities and instruments due to the

idiosyncratic nature of the claims purchased. These risks include the risk that the debtor may contest the allowance of the claim due to disputes the debtor has with the original claimant or the inequitable conduct of the original claimant, or due to administrative errors in connection with the transfer of the claim. Recovery on allowed trade claims may also be impaired if the anticipated dividend payable on unsecured claims in the bankruptcy is not realized or if the timing of the bankruptcy distribution is delayed. As a result of the foregoing factors, trade claims are also subject to the risk that if the Fund does receive payment, it may be in an amount less than what the Fund paid for or otherwise expects to receive in respect of the claim.

In addition, because they are not negotiable instruments, trade claims are typically less liquid than negotiable instruments. Given these factors, trade claims often trade at a discount to other instruments in the same level in a company’s capital structure.

Distressed Securities Risk . The Fund may invest in distressed securities, including loans, bonds and notes, many of which are not publicly traded and that may involve a substantial degree of risk. Distressed securities include securities of companies that are in financial distress and that may be in or about to enter bankruptcy. In certain periods, there may be little or no liquidity in the markets for these securities or other instruments. In addition, the prices of such securities may be subject to periods of abrupt and erratic market movements and above-average price volatility. It may be difficult to obtain financial information regarding the financial condition of a borrower or issuer, and its financial condition may be changing rapidly. It may be more difficult to value such securities and the spread between the bid and asked prices of such securities may be greater than normally expected. If the subadviser’s evaluation of the risks and anticipated outcome of an investment in a distressed security should prove incorrect, the Fund may lose a substantial portion or all of its investment or it may be required to accept cash or securities with a value less than the Fund’s original investment.

Risks of Collateralized Loan Obligations (“CLOs”). The Fund may invest in CLOs, which are trusts or other special purpose entities that are backed by a pool of loans. Such loans may include domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, some of which may be below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans.

CLOs issue classes or “tranches” that vary in risk and yield, and may experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, decrease of market value due to collateral defaults and disappearance of subordinate tranches, market anticipation of defaults, and investor aversion to CLO securities as a class. The risks of investing in CLOs depend largely on the type of the underlying loans and the tranche of the CLO in which the Fund invests. In addition, CLOs carry risks including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, credit risk and default risk.

U.S. Government Securities Risk. Although the Fund may hold securities that carry U.S. government guarantees, these guarantees do not extend to shares of the Fund itself and do not guarantee the market price of the securities. Furthermore, not all securities issued by the U.S. government and its agencies and instrumentalities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury. Some are backed by a right to borrow from the U.S. Treasury, while others are backed only by the credit of the issuing agency or instrumentality. These securities carry at least some risk of non-payment.

In August 2011, Standard & Poor's (“S&P”) downgraded its long-term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. from “AAA” to “AA+”. In reaching its decision, S&P cited the delay by the U.S. government in raising the U.S. debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate. The downgrade by S&P could lead to subsequent downgrades by S&P or downgrades by other credit rating agencies. Both Fitch Ratings and Moody's Investors Service, Inc., which currently have assigned their highest credit ratings to the U.S., have a negative outlook for those credit ratings and will reassess their ratings over the course of the year. These developments, and the government's credit concerns in general, could cause an increase in interest rates and borrowing costs, which may negatively impact both the perception of credit risk associated with the debt securities issued by the U.S. and the country's ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. In addition, these developments could create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which could increase volatility in both stock and bond markets. These events could result in significant adverse impacts on issuers of securities held by the Fund.

When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Securities Risk. When-issued and delayed-delivery securities involve a commitment by the Fund to purchase securities that will be issued at a later date. Because the Fund is committed to buying them at a certain price, any change in the value of these securities, even prior to their issuance, affects the Fund’s share value. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis also involves a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines before the settlement date.

When-issued and delayed-delivery securities can have a leverage-like effect on the Fund, which can increase fluctuations in the Fund’s share price. The Fund will segregate appropriate liquid securities having a market value at least equal to the amount of its purchase commitments. When-issued and delayed-delivery securities may cause the Fund to liquidate positions when it may not be advantageous to do so, in order to satisfy its purchase obligations.

When-issued and delayed-delivery securities also are subject to the risk that a counterparty may fail to complete the sale of the security. If this occurs, the Fund may lose the opportunity to purchase or sell the security at the agreed upon price.

If deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy, the Fund may sell securities it has committed to purchase before those securities are delivered to the Fund on the settlement date.

REITs and Other Real Estate Companies Risk. To the extent the Fund invests in REITs and other real estate companies, its performance will be affected by the performance of the real estate markets and subject to its risks. REIT and other real estate company securities are subject to, among other risks: declines in property values; defaults by mortgagors or other borrowers and tenants; increases in property taxes and other operating expenses; overbuilding; fluctuations in rental income; changes in interest rates; lack of availability of mortgage funds or financing; extended vacancies of properties; changes in tax and regulatory requirements; losses due to environmental liabilities; or casualty or condemnation losses. REITs also are dependent upon management skills and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, self-liquidation and the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free “pass-through” of income under the federal tax law. During periods of high interest rates, REITs and other real estate companies may lose appeal for investors who may be able to obtain higher yields from other income-producing investments. High interest rates may also mean that financing for property purchases and improvements is more costly and difficult to obtain.

Most Equity REITs receive a flow of income from property rentals, which they pay to their shareholders in the form of dividends. In addition, Equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property they own, while Mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of any credit they extend.

REIT and other real estate company securities tend to be small- to mid-cap stocks and are subject to the risks of investing in small- to mid-cap stocks. Some of the REIT securities in which the Fund invests may be preferred stock, which receives preference in the payment of dividends.

ETF Risk. An ETF, which is an investment company, may trade in the secondary market at prices below the value of its underlying portfolio and may not be liquid. An actively managed ETF’s performance will reflect its adviser’s ability to make investment decisions that are suited to achieving the ETF’s investment objectives. A passively managed ETF may not fully replicate the performance of its benchmark index because of, for example, the temporary unavailability of certain index securities in the secondary market or discrepancies between the ETF and the index with respect to the weighting of securities or the number of stocks held. A passively managed ETF may not be permitted to sell poorly performing stocks that are included in its index.

Other Investment Company Risk. To the extent the Fund invests in ETFs or other investment companies, its performance will be affected by the performance of those other investment companies. Through its investment in other investment companies, the Fund is subject to the risks of the investment companies’ investments, as well as to the investment companies’ expenses. Also, an investor in the Fund may receive taxable gains from portfolio transactions by an investment company, as well as taxable gains from transactions in shares of the investment company by the Fund.

Illiquid Investments Risk. Illiquid investments may be more difficult to purchase or sell at an advantageous price or time. Judgment plays a greater role in pricing these investments than it does in pricing investments having more active markets, and there is a greater risk that the investments may not be sold for the price at which the Fund is carrying them. The Fund may receive illiquid securities as a result of its investments in certain special situations.

Restricted Securities Risk. Restricted securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale and may not be sold to the public without an effective registration statement. Before they are registered, such securities may be sold only in a privately negotiated transaction or pursuant to an exemption from registration. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to the Fund.

The SEC has adopted Rule 144A, which is designed to facilitate efficient trading among institutional investors by permitting the sale of certain unregistered securities to qualified institutional buyers. To the extent restricted securities held by the Fund qualify under Rule 144A and an institutional market develops for those securities, the Fund likely will be able to dispose of the securities without registering them. To the extent that institutional buyers become, for a time, uninterested in purchasing these securities, investing in Rule 144A securities could increase the level of the Fund’s illiquidity. The Manager may determine that certain securities qualified for trading under Rule 144A are liquid.

Where registration of a security is required, the Fund may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses, and a considerable period may elapse between the time the Fund desires to sell (and therefore decides to seek registration of) the security, and the time the Fund may be permitted to sell the security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the Fund might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it desired to sell. There is a greater risk that restricted securities may not be sold for the price at which the Fund is carrying them.

High Portfolio Turnover. Several of the strategies utilized by the Fund may engage in active and frequent trading and may have a high portfolio turnover rate, which may increase the Fund’s transaction costs, may adversely affect the Fund’s performance and/or may generate a greater amount of capital gain distributions to shareholders than if the Fund had a low portfolio turnover rate. With a high portfolio turnover rate, it is possible that the Fund may distribute sizable capital gain distributions to shareholders, regardless of the Fund’s performance.

Risk Management. Management undertakes certain analyses with the intention of identifying particular types of risks and reducing the Fund’s exposure to them. However, risk is an essential part of investing, and the degree of return an investor might expect is often tied to the degree of risk the investor is willing to accept. By its very nature, risk involves exposure to the possibility of adverse events. Accordingly, no risk management program can eliminate the Fund’s exposure to such events; at best, it can only reduce the possibility that the Fund will be affected by adverse events, and especially those risks that are not intrinsic to the Fund’s investment program. While the prospectus describes material risk factors associated with the Fund’s investment program, there is no assurance that as a particular situation unfolds in the markets, the Portfolio Managers will identify all of the risks that might affect the Fund, rate their probability or potential magnitude correctly, or be able to take appropriate measures to reduce the Fund’s exposure to them. Measures taken with the intention of decreasing exposure to identified risks might have the unintended effect of increasing exposure to other risks.

Recent Market Conditions. The financial crisis in the U.S. and many foreign economies over the past several years, including the European sovereign debt and banking crises, has resulted, and may continue to result, in an unusually high degree of volatility in the financial markets, both domestic and foreign, and in the net asset values of many mutual funds, including to some extent the Fund. Both domestic and international equity and fixed income markets have been experiencing heightened volatility and turmoil, and issuers that have exposure to the real estate, mortgage, and credit markets and the sovereign debt of certain nations or their political subdivisions have been particularly affected. Conditions in the U.S. and many foreign economies have resulted, and may continue to result, in fixed income instruments experiencing unusual liquidity issues, increased price volatility and, in some cases, credit downgrades and increased likelihood of default. These events have reduced the willingness and ability of some lenders to extend credit, and have made it more difficult for borrowers to obtain financing on attractive terms, if at all. In some cases, traditional market participants have been less willing to make a market in some types of debt instruments, which has affected the liquidity of those instruments. As a result, the values of many types of securities, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed, asset-backed, and corporate debt securities, have been reduced. During times of market turmoil, investors tend to look to the safety of securities issued or backed by the U.S. Treasury, causing the prices of these securities to rise and the yields to decline.

The reduced liquidity in fixed income and credit markets may negatively affect many issuers worldwide. In addition, global economies and financial markets are becoming increasingly interconnected, which increases the possibilities that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or region. In response to the crisis, the U.S. and other governments and the Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks have taken steps to support financial markets. Where economic conditions are recovering, they are nevertheless perceived as still fragile. Withdrawal of government support, failure of efforts in response to the crisis, or investor perception that such efforts are not succeeding, could adversely impact the value and liquidity of certain securities. The severity or duration of adverse economic conditions may also be affected by policy changes made by governments or quasi-governmental organizations, including changes in tax laws. In particular, the

impact of U.S. financial regulation legislation on the markets and the practical implications for market participants may not be fully known for some time. Because the situation in the markets is widespread, it may be difficult to identify both risks and opportunities using past models of the interplay of market forces, or to predict the duration of these market conditions. Changes in market conditions will not have the same impact on all types of securities.

Information about Additional Potential Principal Investment Strategies

The Portfolio Managers currently intend to allocate the Fund’s assets among one or more of the following additional strategies in the future if a subadviser is selected for a strategy:

Managed Futures: This strategy involves investing in a combination of derivative instruments and fixed income securities, seeking absolute (positive) returns with limited correlation to the broad equity markets. The subadviser will primarily use the following derivative instruments: futures, forward contracts and options based on commodities, currencies, fixed income securities, and equities.

Global Macro Investing: This strategy involves a top-down global approach to investing. The subadviser will typically take long and short positions across various U.S. and foreign markets, sectors and companies in an effort to benefit from those investments which the subadviser believes have the highest probability for success (long positions) and those that have the highest probability for decline (short positions). The subadviser seeks to identify such opportunities by applying fundamental macro-economic theory to consider and analyze the economic and political environments in countries and/or regions around the world. Specifically, the subadviser will consider factors such as interest rate levels, monetary and fiscal policy, currency exchange rates, unemployment levels, GDP and geopolitical events and their effect on the economy of the country, region or the world.

Equity Market Neutral: This strategy takes long and short positions in equity securities in an attempt to generate an absolute return while maintaining a low net investment exposure. The subadviser will employ either a fundamental approach, relying on earnings and other financial data to pick long and short positions, or a model-driven approach, selecting long and short positions based on technical (i.e., market price movements) as well as fundamental factors. Holding periods for positions vary across subadvisers and can be as short as a day, which would result in high portfolio turnover.

*****

Both the Managed Futures and Global Macro Investing strategies may seek to gain exposure to the commodity markets by investing, directly or indirectly, in futures contracts on individual commodities and other commodity-linked derivative instruments. Although the Fund may make these investments in commodity-linked derivative instruments directly, the Fund expects to gain exposure to these investments primarily by investing in a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund formed in the Cayman Islands (“Subsidiary”). The Portfolio Managers would invest in the subsidiary only if they determined to allocate some of the Fund’s assets to the Managed Futures or Global Macro Investing strategy.

The Fund would invest in the Subsidiary in order to gain exposure to the commodities markets within the limitations of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to “regulated investment companies.” If the Fund does so, the Fund must maintain no more than 25% of its total assets in the Subsidiary at the end of every quarter of its taxable year.

The Subsidiary would be overseen by its own board of directors. However, the Fund’s Board of Trustees would maintain oversight responsibility for investment activities of the Subsidiary generally as if the Subsidiary’s investments were held directly by the Fund. The Manager would be responsible for the Subsidiary’s day-to-day business pursuant to the investment management agreement between the Fund and the Manager, and the Adviser would select the Subsidiary’s investments pursuant to the investment advisory agreement with the Manager, including the retention of subadvisers to manage the Subsidiary’s assets. Under these agreements, the Manager, Adviser and subadvisers would provide the Subsidiary with the same type of management, advisory and subadvisory services, under the same terms, as are provided to the Fund.

In managing the Subsidiary’s investment portfolio, and in adhering to the Fund’s compliance policies and procedures, the Manager and Adviser would treat the assets of the Subsidiary generally as if the assets were held directly by the Fund. The Manager and Adviser would also treat the assets of the Subsidiary generally as if the assets were held directly by the Fund with respect to its adherence to the Fund’s investment policies and restrictions.

The Subsidiary would also bear the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the custody, transfer agency, and audit services that it receives. The Fund currently expects that the expenses borne by the Subsidiary would not be material in relation to the value of the Fund’s assets.

Please refer to the Statement of Additional Information for additional information about the potential organization and management of the Subsidiary.

Information About Risks of Additional Potential Principal Investment Strategies

In addition to the risks described under the section “Principal Investment Risks,” the additional potential principal investment strategies are subject to these additional risks.

Commodity Risk. The Fund’s and the Subsidiary’s significant investment exposure to the commodities markets and/or a particular sector of the commodities markets, may subject the Fund and the Subsidiary to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. The commodities markets are impacted by a variety of factors, including changes in overall market movements, domestic and foreign political and economic events and policies, war, acts of terrorism, changes in domestic or foreign interest rates and/or investor expectations concerning interest rates, domestic and foreign inflation rates and investment and trading activities in commodities. Prices of various commodities may also be affected by factors such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs and other regulatory developments. The frequency, duration and magnitude of such changes cannot be predicted. The prices of commodities can also fluctuate widely due to supply and demand disruptions in major producing or consuming regions. Certain commodities may be produced in a limited number of countries and may be controlled by a small number of producers or groups of producers. As a result, political, economic and supply related events in such countries could have a disproportionate impact on the prices of such commodities. No active trading market may exist for certain commodities investments, which may impair the ability of the Fund to sell or to realize the full value of such investments in the event of the need to liquidate such investments. In addition, adverse market conditions may impair the liquidity of actively traded commodities investments. Because the Fund’s and the Subsidiary’s performance would be linked to the performance of potentially volatile commodities, investors should be willing to assume the risks of significant fluctuations in the value of the Fund’s shares.

Tax Risk. To qualify as a “regulated investment company” under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”) (“RIC”) and receive “modified pass-through” tax treatment, the Fund must, among other things, derive at least 90% of its gross income for each taxable year from sources treated as “qualifying income” under the Code. Although qualifying income does not include income derived directly from commodities, including certain commodity-linked derivative instruments, the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) has issued a large number of private letter rulings to other entities (which the Fund may not cite as precedent) beginning in 2006 that income that a RIC derives from a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary (such as the Subsidiary) that earns income derived from commodity-linked derivative instruments is such “qualifying income.” The Service suspended the issuance of those rulings in July 2011. If the Service were to change those policies, the Fund would have to rely on an alternative basis to determine that its income from the Subsidiary is “qualifying income.” Such alternative bases are not supported by private letter rulings directly on point. If the Service disagreed with the Fund’s position, such that the Fund’s income from the Subsidiary is not “qualifying income,” the Fund may be unable to qualify as a regulated investment company for one or more years, meaning that all of its income and gains could be taxed first at the Fund level and again when paid out to shareholders. In that event, the Fund may not utilize all the potential additional investment strategies.

The tax treatment of income from commodity-related investments and of the Fund’s income from the Subsidiary may be adversely affected by future legislation, Treasury Regulations, and/or guidance issued by the Service that could affect the character, timing, and/or amount of the Fund’s taxable income or capital gains and distributions it makes. If the Service were

to change its ruling position and concluded that the Fund’s income from the Subsidiary would not be qualifying income, the Fund would be unable to qualify as a RIC for one or more taxable years. If the Fund failed to so qualify for any taxable year but was eligible to and did cure the failure, it would incur potentially significant additional federal income tax expense. If, on the other hand, the Fund failed to so qualify for any taxable year, and was ineligible to or otherwise did not cure the failure, it would be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at corporate rates, with the consequence that its income available for distribution to shareholders would be reduced and all such distributions from current or accumulated earnings and profits would be taxable to them as dividend income.

Subsidiary Risk. By investing in the Subsidiary, the Fund would be indirectly exposed to the risks associated with the Subsidiary’s investments and operations. The commodity-linked derivative instruments and other investments held by the Subsidiary would be similar to those that are permitted to be held by the Fund and thus, would be subject to the same risks whether they were held by the Fund or the Subsidiary. There could be no assurance that the investment objective of the Subsidiary would be achieved. The Subsidiary would not be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and, unless otherwise noted in this prospectus, would not be subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. However, the Fund would wholly own and control the Subsidiary, and the investment manager of both the Fund and the Subsidiary would be Neuberger Berman Management LLC and the investment adviser of both the Fund and the Subsidiary would be NB Alternative Investment Management LLC, making it unlikely that the Subsidiary would take action contrary to the interests of the Fund and its shareholders. The Fund’s Board of Trustees would maintain oversight responsibility for the investment activities of the Fund, including its investment in the Subsidiary, and the Fund’s role as sole shareholder of the Subsidiary. In adhering to the Fund’s investment restrictions and limitations, Neuberger Berman Management LLC would treat the assets of the Subsidiary generally as if the assets were held directly by the Fund. Changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands, under which the Fund is and the Subsidiary would be organized, respectively, could result in the inability of the Fund and/or the Subsidiary to operate as described in this prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information and could adversely affect the Fund and its shareholders. For example, the Cayman Islands currently does not impose any income, corporate or capital gains tax, estate duty, inheritance tax, gift tax or withholding tax on the Subsidiary. If Cayman Islands law were changed and the Subsidiary was required to pay Cayman Island taxes, the investment returns of the Fund would likely decrease.

Regulatory Risk. Governments, agencies or other regulatory bodies may adopt or change laws or regulations that could adversely affect the issuer, the market value of the security, or the Fund’s performance.

Under recent CFTC rule amendments, the Fund would need to comply with certain disclosure and operational regulations governing commodity pools, which would increase the Fund’s regulatory compliance costs. To the extent additional regulations are adopted, the Fund may not be able to utilize all the potential additional investment strategies.

Information about Additional Risks

The Fund may engage in certain practices and invest in certain securities in addition to those described as its “principal investment strategies” in its Fund Summary section. For example, to the extent that the Fund engages in borrowing or securities lending, it will be subject to the additional risks associated with these practices.

Borrowing or securities lending would create investment leverage, meaning that certain gains or losses would be amplified, increasing share price movements. With respect to borrowing, the Fund may borrow money to obtain the collateral needed to borrow a security in order to effect a short sale of that security. The cost to the Fund of borrowing may exceed the profits attained on any such shorts positions. Similarly, the Fund may lend securities and use the collateral obtained from the securities loans as the collateral necessary to borrow a security on which the Fund is taking a short position. Securities lending involves some risk of loss of the Fund’s rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially.

In addition, the Fund may be an investment option for a Neuberger Berman mutual fund that is managed as a “fund of funds.” As a result, from time to time, the Fund may experience relatively large redemptions or investments and could be required to sell securities or to invest cash at a time when it is not advantageous to do so.

When the Fund anticipates adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, or receives large cash inflows, it may temporarily depart from its goal and use a different investment strategy (including leaving a significant portion of its assets uninvested) for defensive purposes. Doing so could help the Fund avoid losses, but may mean lost opportunities. In addition, different factors could affect the Fund’s performance and the Fund may not achieve its goal.

Management of the Fund

Investment Manager and Investment Adviser

Neuberger Berman Management LLC (the “Manager”), located at 605 Third Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10158, is the Fund’s investment manager, administrator, and distributor. Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement, the Manager is responsible for providing investment advisory services to the Fund. The Manager carries out its duties subject to the policies established by the Board of Trustees. The investment advisory agreement establishes the fees the Fund pays to the Manager for its services as the Fund’s investment manager and the expenses paid directly by the Fund. The Manager engages NBAIM (“Adviser”), located at 605 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10158, as investment adviser to choose the Fund’s investments and handle its day-to-day business, including the oversight of the subadvisers’ investment activities. As investment manager, the Manager is responsible for overseeing the activities of the Adviser. Subject to the general oversight of the Board of Trustees, the Adviser is responsible for managing the Fund in accordance with its investment objective and policies using the multi-strategy and multi-manager approach discussed in the “Principal Investment Strategies” section of this Prospectus, and making recommendations to the Board of Trustees with respect to the hiring, termination or replacement of the Fund’s subadvisers. Together, the Neuberger Berman affiliates manage approximately $205 billion in total assets (as of 12/31/2012) and continue an asset management history that began in 1939.

The Fund pays the Manager a fee at the annual rate of 1.70% of the first $250 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, 1.675% of the next $250 million, 1.650% of the next $250 million, 1.625% of the next $250 million, 1.60% of the next $500 million, 1.575% of the next $2.5 billion, and 1.550% of average daily net assets in excess of $4 billion for investment management services. Class R6 of the Fund will pay the Manager fees at the annual rate of 0.08% of the class’ average daily net assets for administrative services provided to Class R6 of the Fund.

A discussion regarding the basis for the approval of the Fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements by the Board of Trustees is available in the Fund’s annual report dated October 2013.

Portfolio Managers of the Adviser

David Kupperman, Ph.D., is a Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM. Prior to joining the firm in 2011, he was a partner and member of the investment committee at another asset management firm that focused on alternative investing and managing fund-of-hedge funds .

Jeff Majit, CFA, is a Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM. He has been a Portfolio Manager with the firm since 2000.

Ian Haas, CFA, is a Senior Vice President of NBM and NBAIM. He has been a Portfolio Manager with the firm since 2000.

Fred Ingham, ACA, CFA, is a Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM. He has been a Portfolio Manager with the firm since 2005.

Eric Weinstein, is a Managing Director of NBM and NBAIM. He joined the firm in 2002.

Messrs. Kupperman, Majit, Haas, Ingham and Weinstein are collectively responsible for analysis of investment strategies, including strategies to be added to the Fund and searches for and research on new potential subadvisers and for security selection when the Adviser invests the Fund's assets directly. Messrs. Kupperman and Majit are primarily responsible for the day-to-day monitoring and oversight of the subadvisers. Each of the Portfolio Managers has managed the Fund since its inception in 2012.

Please see the Statement of Additional Information for additional information about the compensation of each Portfolio Manager of the Adviser, other accounts managed by each Portfolio Manager of the Adviser, and the ownership of shares in the Fund for each Portfolio Manager of the Adviser.

Subadvisers

The Manager and Adviser engage Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Good Hill Partners LP, Lazard Asset Management LLC, Levin Capital Strategies, L.P., Loeb Arbitrage Management LP, MacKay Shields LLC, SLS Management, LLC, Sound Point Capital Management, L.P., Turner Investments, L.P., and Visium Asset Management, LP as subadvisers to provide investment management services. The Manager compensates the subadvisers out of the investment advisory fees it receives from the Fund. Each subadviser makes investment decisions for the assets it has been allocated to manage, subject to the overall supervision of the Manager and Adviser. The Adviser oversees the subadvisers for compliance with the Fund’s investment objective, policies, strategies and restrictions, and monitors each subadviser’s adherence to its investment style. The Board of Trustees oversees the Manager, Adviser and the subadvisers, approves procedures that the Manager and Adviser must follow in their oversight of the subadvisers, and oversees the hiring, termination and replacement of subadvisers recommended by the Adviser.

Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC (“Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn”), located at 520 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10022, manages the assets allocated to the global equity long/short strategy. Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, founded in 1973, provides investment advisory services for mutual funds, hedge funds and other products. As of December 31, 2012, Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn managed approximately $13.4 billion in total assets.

GAMCO Asset Management Inc. (“Gabelli”), located at One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580, manages the assets allocated to the merger arbitrage strategy. Gabelli is a subsidiary of GAMCO Investors, Inc., which is indirectly majority owned by Mario J. Gabelli. Gabelli, founded in 1977, is a diversified asset manager and financial services company managing assets for high net worth individuals, institutions and retail investors through a variety of investment products. As of December 31, 2012, Gabelli managed approximately $36.4 billion in total assets.

Good Hill Partners LP (“Good Hill”), located at 1599 Post Road East, Westport, CT 06880, manages the assets allocated to the mortgaged-backed securities and asset-backed securities strategy. Good Hill, founded by Franklin J. Collins IV and Brant Brooks in 2006, specializes in fixed income securities and provides investment management services on a discretionary basis to private investment vehicles and separately managed accounts as well as the Fund. As of December 31, 2012, Good Hill managed approximately $786 million in total assets.

Lazard Asset Management LLC (“Lazard”), located at 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112, manages assets allocated to the global equity long/short strategy. Lazard is a registered investment adviser providing asset management services since 1970. As of March 31, 2013, Lazard, along with asset management affiliates in the Lazard Group, managed approximately $172 billion in total assets.

Levin Capital Strategies, LP (“Levin Capital Strategies”), located at 595 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10022, manages the assets allocated to the event driven strategy. Levin Capital Strategies, founded in 2005, is a registered investment adviser. As of December 31, 2012, Levin Capital Strategies managed approximately $6.6 billion in total assets.

Loeb Arbitrage Management LP (“Loeb”), located at 61 Broadway, New York, NY 10006, manages assets allocated to the event driven strategy. Loeb is a registered investment adviser providing asset management services since 1985. Loeb is part of Loeb King Capital Management Group which has approximately $583 million in assets under management as of June 30, 2013.

MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields”), located at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 43rd Floor, New York, NY 10105, manages the assets allocated to the credit long/short strategy. MacKay Shields, founded in 1938, is a registered investment adviser and a wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Insurance Company. As of December 31, 2012, MacKay Shields managed approximately $78.3 billion in total assets.

SLS Management, LLC (“SLS Management”), located at 140 West 57th Street, 7th Floor New York, NY 10019, manages assets allocated to the equity restructurings long/short strategy. SLS Management, founded in 1999, is a registered investment adviser. As of September 30, 2013, SLS Management managed approximately $175 million in total assets.

Sound Point Capital Management, L.P. (“Sound Point Capital”), located at 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 36th Floor, New York, NY 10036, manages the assets allocated to the stressed and distressed credit strategy. Sound Point Capital is a registered investment adviser. As of December 31, 2012, Sound Point Capital managed approximately $1.06 billion in total assets.

Turner Investments, L.P. (“Turner Investments”), located at 1205 Westlakes Drive, Suite 100, Berwyn, PA 19312, manages the assets allocated to the healthcare long/short strategy. Turner Investments, founded in 1990, provides investment advisory services for mutual funds, institutions, private wealth clients and other products. As of December 31, 2012, Turner Investments managed approximately $10.7 billion in total assets.

Visium Asset Management, LP (“Visium Asset Management”), located at 888 Seventh Avenue, Floor 22, New York, NY 10019, manages the assets allocated to the event driven strategy. Visium Asset Management, founded in 2005, is a registered investment adviser. As of December 31, 2012, Visium Asset Management managed approximately $3.7 billion in total assets.

The Manager and the Fund have obtained an exemptive order from the SEC that permits the Manager and Adviser to engage additional unaffiliated subadvisers, and to enter into and materially amend an existing or future subadvisory agreement with an unaffiliated subadviser, upon the approval of the Board of Trustees, without obtaining shareholder approval. The initial sole shareholder of the Fund has approved the Fund’s use of this exemptive order.

Portfolio Managers of the Subadvisers

Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC

Jay Abramson, is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Abramson joined Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn in 1985.

G AMCO Asset Management Inc .

Mario J. Gabelli, CFA, is the Chief Investment Officer-Value Portfolios of Gabelli and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of its parent company, GAMCO Investors, Inc. Mr. Gabelli is also an officer or director of other companies affiliated with GAMCO Investors, Inc. Mr. Gabelli founded Gabelli & Company, Inc. in 1977.

Good Hill Partners LP

Franklin J. Collins IV is a Co-Chief Investment Officer and Managing Partner of Good Hill. Mr. Collins co-founded Good Hill in 2006.

Brant Brooks is a Co-Chief Investment Officer and Partner of Good Hill. Mr. Brooks cofounded Good Hill in 2006.

Lazard Asset Management LLC

Jean-Daniel Malan , is a Director and Portfolio Manager/Analyst. Mr. Malan re-joined Lazard in 2008.

Levin Capital Strategies, L.P.

Samuel Hendel, is a Portfolio Manager and Securities Analyst. Mr. Hendel joined Levin Capital Strategies in 2009. Prior to joining the firm, he was a Senior Securities Analyst at another asset management firm.

John A. Levin, is the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Portfolio Manager. Mr. Levin founded Levin Capital Strategies in 2005.

Loeb Arbitrage Management LP

Gideon King, is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. King joined Loeb in 1993.

Scott Williams, is the Director of US Arbitrage. Mr. Williams joined Loeb in 2012. Prior to joining the firm, he was a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager/Analyst at another asset management firm.

Blaine Marder, is the Managing Director of Event Driven and Value investing. Mr. Marder joined Loeb in 2004.

Adam Weingarten, is the Director of Credit investing. Mr. Weingarten joined Loeb in 2011. Prior to joining the firm, he was a High Yield Credit Research Analyst at another asset management firm.

Brian Anderson, is the Director of Non-US Arbitrage and Special Situations. Mr. Anderson joined Loeb in 1999.

MacKay Shields LLC

Dan Roberts, is a Senior Managing Director, Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of the Global Fixed Income Division of MacKay Shields LLC. Mr. Roberts joined MacKay Shields in 2004.

Lou Cohen, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager. Mr. Cohen joined MacKay Shields in 2004.

Michael Kimble, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager. Mr. Kimble joined MacKay Shields in 2004.

Taylor Wagenseil, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager. Mr. Wagenseil joined MacKay Shields in 2004.

SLS Management, LLC

Scott Swid, is a Portfolio Manager, Managing Member and Senior Securities Analyst. Mr. Swid founded SLS Management, LLC in 1999.

Sound Point Capital Management, L.P.

Stephen Ketchum, is the Founder and Managing Partner. Mr. Ketchum founded Sound Point Capital in 2008. Prior to founding the firm, he was the Global Head of Media Investment and Corporate Banking for a large financial services firm.

Turner Investments, L.P.

Vijay Shankaran, M.D., Ph.D., is the Lead Portfolio Manager, Global Equity Analyst and Principal. Mr. Shankaran joined Turner Investments in 2006.

Visium Asset Management, LP

Francis Gallagher, is a Portfolio Manager. Mr. Gallagher has been a Portfolio Manager with Visium Asset Management for the past five years.

Peter Drippé, is a Portfolio Manager. Mr. Drippé has been a Portfolio Manager with Visium Asset Management for the past five years.

Financial Highlights

Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund—Institutional Class

The figures are from Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund Institutional Class. Except for the figures for the six months ended April 30, 2013, all figures have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. Their report, along with full financial statements, appears in the Fund’s most recent annual shareholder report (see back cover).

YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,

2012 (1)

Six Month

Ended

4/30/2013

(Unaudited)


PER-SHARE DATA ($)
Data apply to a single share throughout each year indicated. You can see what the Fund earned (or lost), what it distributed to investors, and how its share price changed.
Share price (NAV) at beginning of year		10.00		10.00
Plus:	Income from investment operations
	Net investment income (loss) (6)	(0.08	)	(0.01	)
	Net gains/(losses)—realized and unrealized	0.08		0.51
	Subtotal: income (loss) from investment operations	—		0.50
Minus:	Distributions to shareholders
	Income dividends	—		0.02
	Capital gains	—		0.04
	Subtotal: distributions to shareholders	—		0.06
Equals:	Share price (NAV) at end of year	10.00		10.44

RATIOS (% OF AVERAGE NET ASSETS)

The ratios show the Fund’s expenses and net investment income (loss)—as they actually are as well as how they would have been if certain expense reimbursement and offset arrangements had not been in effect.
Net expenses—actual		2.81	(4)(7)	2.46	(4)
Net expenses (excluding expenses on securities sold short)—actual		2.45	(4)(7)	2.11	(4)
Gross expenses (2)		7.86	(4)(7)	3.92	(4)
Gross expenses (excluding expenses on securities sold short) (2)		7.50	(4)(7)	3.57	(4)
Net investment income (loss)—actual		(1.81	) (4)(7)	(0.24	) (4)

OTHER DATA

Total return shows how an investment in the Fund would have performed over each year, assuming all distributions were reinvested. The turnover rate reflects how actively the Fund bought and sold securities.
Total return (%) (3)		0.00	(5)	4.97	(5)
Net assets at end of year (in millions of dollars)		33.2		51.1
Portfolio turnover rate (including securities sold short)(%)		270	(5)	196	(5)
Portfolio turnover rate (excluding securities sold short)(%)		213	(5)	181	(5)

(1)	Period from 5/15/2012 (beginning of operations) to 10/31/2012.
(2)	Shows what this ratio would have been if there had been no expense reimbursement.
(3)	Would have been lower if Neuberger Berman Management LLC had not reimbursed certain expenses.
(4)	Annualized.
(5)	Not annualized.
(6)	The per share amounts have been calculated based on the average number of shares outstanding during each fiscal period.
(7)	Organization expenses, which are non-recurring expenses, are included in the ratio on a non-annualized basis.

Your Investment

Maintaining Your Account

Class R6 shares described in this prospectus generally are available only through investment providers, such as banks, brokerage firms, retirement plan administrators, and financial advisers. For certain institutional investors, shares of the Fund may be available directly from Neuberger Berman Management LLC (“NBM”).

Class R6 shares generally are available only to 401(k) plans, 457 plans, employer-sponsored 403(b) plans, profit-sharing and money purchase pension plans, defined benefit plans and non-qualified deferred compensation plans where shares are held on the books of the Fund through omnibus accounts (either at the plan level or at the level of the investment provider), certain products managed by Neuberger Berman or funds in the Neuberger Berman family of funds and institutional investors if approved by NBM.

Class R6 shares generally are not available to retail non-retirement accounts, traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs), Roth IRAs, Coverdell education savings accounts, SEPs, SARSEPs, SIMPLE IRAs, or individual 403(b) plans.

Eligible retirement plans generally may open an account and purchase Class R6 shares by contacting an investment provider authorized to sell the Fund’s shares. Class R6 shares may not be available through certain investment providers.

Plan participants who are considering an investment in the Fund should contact their employer, retirement plan administrator, or service agent that provides shareholder servicing, record keeping, account maintenance or other services for their retirement plan (“Plan Service Provider”) for details about the Fund that are available under their retirement plan and the procedures for buying and selling shares.

The Fund does not impose minimum purchase requirements for Class R6 shares. However, you should contact your Plan Service Provider to determine whether it imposes minimum purchase requirements.

The Fund does not issue certificates for shares.

For certain institutional investors, shares of the Fund may be available for purchase directly from NBM by regular, first class mail (Neuberger Berman Funds, Boston Service Center, P.O. Box 8403, Boston, MA 02266-8403), by express delivery, registered mail, or certified mail (Neuberger Berman Funds, c/o State Street Bank and Trust Company, 30 Dan Road, Canton, MA 02021) or by wire, fax, telephone or exchange. Please call 800-866-6264 for an application and instructions.

Investment checks must be drawn on a U.S. bank. We cannot accept cash, money orders, starter checks, cashier’s checks, travelers checks, or other cash equivalents. You will be responsible for any losses or fees resulting from a bad check; if necessary, we may sell other shares belonging to you in order to cover these losses. All checks must be made out to “Neuberger Berman Funds”; we cannot accept checks made out to you or other parties and signed over to us.

If you bought shares directly from NBM, to sell shares send a letter signed by all registered owners; include your name, account number, the Fund name, the dollar amount or number of shares you want to sell, and any other instructions. If by regular, first class mail, send to Neuberger Berman Funds, Boston Service Center, P.O. Box 8403, Boston, MA 02266-8403. If by express delivery, registered mail, or certified mail, send to Neuberger Berman Funds, c/o State Street Bank and Trust Company, 30 Dan Road, Canton, MA 02021. Unless you instruct us otherwise, we will mail your proceeds by check to the address of record, payable to the registered owner(s); checks will not be forwarded. If you have a designated bank account on your application, you can request that we wire the proceeds to this account. You can also request that we send the proceeds to your designated bank account by electronic transfer (ACH). Please also supply us with your e-mail address and daytime telephone number when you write to us in the event we need to reach you.

You can exchange an investment from one fund to a comparable class of another fund in the fund family through an exchange of shares, or by electing to use your cash distributions from one fund to purchase shares of the other fund. There are three things to remember when making an exchange:

■	both accounts must have the same registration
■	you will need to observe the minimum investment and minimum account balance requirements along with any other eligibility requirements for the fund accounts involved
■	because an exchange is treated as a sale of the exchanged shares for tax purposes, consider any tax consequences before placing your order.

The exchange privilege can be withdrawn from any investor that we believe is trying to “time the market” or is otherwise making exchanges that we judge to be excessive. Frequent exchanges can interfere with fund management and affect costs and performance for other shareholders. Contact your investment provider to see if it allows you to take advantage of the fund exchange program and for its policies to effect an exchange. Your ability to exchange to another fund in the fund family may be limited by the availability of a given fund in your retirement plan as determined by your Plan Service Provider.

Every buy or sell order will be processed at the next share price to be calculated after the order has been accepted. Purchase orders are deemed “accepted” when the Fund’s transfer agent has received payment for the shares. Redemption orders are deemed “accepted” when the Fund's transfer agent has received your order to sell Fund shares. In the case of certain institutional investors, Neuberger Berman Management LLC will process purchase orders when received, on the basis of a pre-existing arrangement to make payment by the following morning. These policies apply to the investment providers who invest in the Fund. Please contact your investment provider for its policies.

Under certain circumstances, the Fund reserves the right to:

■	suspend the offering of shares
■	reject any exchange or purchase order
■	suspend or reject future purchase orders from any investor who does not provide payment to settle a purchase order
■	change, suspend, or revoke the exchange privilege
■	satisfy an order to sell Fund shares with securities rather than cash, for certain very large orders
■	suspend or postpone your right to sell Fund shares or postpone payments on redemption for more than seven days, on days when trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“Exchange”) is restricted, or as otherwise permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
■	remain open and process orders to purchase or sell Fund shares when the Exchange is closed.

The Fund reserves the right to pay in kind for redemptions. The Fund does not redeem in kind under normal circumstances, but would do so when the Board of Trustees has determined that it is in the best interests of the Fund’s shareholders as a whole.

Proceeds from the sale of shares. The proceeds from the shares you sell are generally sent out the next business day after your order is executed, and nearly always within seven days. When you sell shares through your investment provider, contact your provider to find out when proceeds will be sent to you. There are two cases in which proceeds may be delayed beyond this time:

■	in unusual circumstances where the law allows additional time if needed
■	if a check you wrote to buy shares has not cleared by the time you sell those shares; clearance may take up to 15 calendar days from the date of purchase.

If you think you may need to sell shares soon after buying them, you can avoid the check clearing time by investing by wire.

Uncashed checks. We do not pay interest on uncashed checks from Fund distributions or the sale of Fund shares. We are not responsible for checks after they are sent to you. Checks will not be forwarded if the address of record is incorrect. After allowing a reasonable time for delivery, please call us if you have not received an expected check. While we cannot track a check, we may make arrangements for a replacement.

Statements and confirmations. Please review your account statements and confirmations carefully as soon as you receive them. You must contact us within 30 days if you have any questions or notice any discrepancies. Otherwise, you may adversely affect your right to make a claim about the transaction(s).

Investment Providers

Class R6 shares described in this prospectus may be purchased through certain investment providers, such as banks, brokerage firms, retirement plan administrators, and financial advisers.

The fees and policies outlined in this prospectus are set by the Fund and by NBM. However, most of the information you will need for managing your investment will come from your investment provider. This includes information on how to buy and sell Class R6 shares, investor services, and additional policies.

In exchange for the services it offers, your investment provider may charge fees that are in addition to those described in this prospectus.

A Plan Service Provider or an employee benefits office can provide plan participants with detailed information on how to participate in the plan, elect the Fund as an investment option, elect different investment options, alter the amounts contributed to the plan, or change allocations among investment options. For questions about participant accounts, plan participants should contact their Plan Service Provider or their employee benefits office.

Investment providers may provide some of the shareholder servicing and account maintenance services required by plan accounts and their plan participants, including transfers of registration, dividend payee changes and generation of confirmation statements, and may arrange for Plan Service Providers to provide other investment or administrative services. Investment providers may charge plans and plan participants transaction fees and/or other additional amounts for such services. Similarly, plans may charge plan participants for certain expenses, which are in addition to those described in this prospectus. These fees and additional amounts could reduce an investment return in Class R6 shares of the Fund.

Information Required from New Accounts

To help the U.S. government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person who opens an account.

When you open an account, we (which may include your investment provider acting on our behalf) will require your name, address, date of birth, and social security number or other identifying number. We may also require other identifying documents. If we cannot verify the information you supply to us or if it is incomplete, we may be required to return your funds or redeem your account.

Share Prices

Because Class R6 shares of each Fund do not have a sales charge, the price you pay for each share of the Fund is the Fund’s net asset value per share. Similarly, because the Fund does not charge fees for selling shares, your Fund pays you the full share price (net asset value) when you sell shares.

If you use an investment provider, that provider may charge fees that are in addition to those described in this prospectus.

The Fund is generally open for business every day the Exchange is open. The Exchange is generally closed on all national holidays and Good Friday; Fund shares will not be priced on those days or other days on which the Exchange is closed. The Fund may decide to remain open on a day when the Exchange is closed for unusual reasons. In such a case, the Fund would post a notice on www.nb.com.

Each Fund calculates its share price as of the end of regular trading on the Exchange on business days, usually 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. In general, every buy or sell order you place will go through at the next share price calculated after your order has been accepted (see “Maintaining Your Account” for information on placing orders). Check with your investment provider

to find out by what time your order must be received so that it can be processed the same day. Depending on when your investment provider accepts orders, it is possible that the Fund’s share price could change on days when you are unable to buy or sell shares.

Because foreign markets may be open on days when U.S. markets are closed, the value of foreign securities owned by the Fund could change on days when you cannot buy or sell Fund shares. Remember, though, any purchase or sale takes place at the next share price calculated after your order is accepted.

Share Price Calculations

The net asset value per share of each class of the Fund is the total value of Fund assets attributable to shares of that class minus the liabilities attributable to that class, divided by the total number of shares outstanding for that class. Because the value of the Fund's portfolio securities changes every business day, its share price usually changes as well.

Equity securities (including securities issued by ETFs) held by the Fund generally are valued by one or more independent pricing services approved by the Board of Trustees at the last reported sale price or official closing price or, if there is no reported sale or official closing price, on the basis of market quotations. Debt securities (other than short-term securities) held by the Fund generally are valued by one or more independent pricing services approved by the Board of Trustees on the basis of market quotations. Short-term securities held by the Fund may be valued on the basis of amortized cost.

If a valuation for a security is not available from an independent pricing service or if Neuberger Berman Management LLC believes in good faith that the valuation does not reflect the amount the Fund would receive on a current sale of that security, the Fund seeks to obtain quotations from principal market makers. If such quotations are not readily available, the Fund may use a fair value estimate made according to methods approved by the Board of Trustees. The Fund may also use these methods to value certain types of illiquid securities. Fair value pricing generally will be used if the market in which a portfolio security trades closes early or if trading in a particular security was halted during the day and did not resume prior to the Fund’s net asset value calculation.

The Fund may also fair value securities that trade in a foreign market if significant events that appear likely to affect the value of those securities occur between the time the foreign market closes and the time the Exchange closes. Significant events may include (1) corporate actions or announcements that affect a single issuer, (2) governmental actions that affect securities in one sector, country or region, (3) natural disasters or armed conflicts that affect a country or region, or (4) significant domestic or foreign market fluctuations.

The effect of using fair value pricing is that a portfolio security will be priced based on the subjective judgment of Neuberger Berman Management LLC, operating under procedures approved by the Board of Trustees, instead of being priced using valuations from an independent pricing service. Fair value pricing can help to protect the Fund by reducing arbitrage opportunities available to short-term traders, but there is no assurance that fair value pricing will completely prevent dilution of the Fund's net asset value by such traders.

Distributions and Taxes

Distributions. The Fund pays out to its shareholders any net investment income and net realized capital gains. Ordinarily, the Fund makes any distributions once a year (in December). The Fund may make additional distributions, if necessary, to avoid income or excise taxes.

Unless you designate otherwise, your income and capital gain distributions from the Fund will be reinvested in additional Class R6 shares of the Fund. However, if you prefer, you may receive all distributions in cash or reinvest capital gain distributions but receive income dividends in cash. Distributions taken in cash can be sent to you by check or by electronic

transfer to a designated bank account or invested in Class R6 shares of another fund in the fund family with the same account registration. To take advantage of one of these options, please indicate your choice on your application or contact the Fund in writing or by phone if you bought shares directly. If you use an investment provider, you must consult it about whether your income and capital gain distributions will be reinvested in additional Class R6 shares of the Fund or paid to you in cash.

How distributions are taxed. Except for tax-advantaged retirement plans and other tax-exempt investors (collectively, “exempt investors”), all Fund distributions you receive are generally taxable to you, regardless of whether you take them in cash or reinvest them in additional Fund shares.

Fund distributions to qualified retirement plans generally are tax-free. Eventual withdrawals from retirement plans generally are subject to tax.

Distributions generally are taxable to you in the year you receive them. In some cases, however, distributions you receive in January are treated for federal income tax purposes as if they had been paid the previous December 31. Your tax statement (see “Taxes and You”) will help clarify this for you.

Distributions of net investment income and the excess of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss (“dividends”) are generally taxed as ordinary income.

Distributions of net capital gain (i.e., the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) are generally taxed as long-term capital gain. Whether the Fund ’ s capital gain distributions are treated as long-term or short-term gain depends on how long the Fund held the securities it sold that generated the gain, not on when you bought your shares of the Fund or whether you reinvested your distributions.

How share transactions are taxed. When you sell (redeem) or exchange Fund shares, you generally will realize a taxable gain or loss. An exception, once again, applies to exempt investors.

Taxes and You

The taxes you actually owe on Fund distributions and share transactions can vary with many factors, such as your marginal tax bracket, how long you held your shares, and whether you owe federal alternative minimum tax.

How can you figure out your tax liability on Fund distributions and share transactions? One helpful tool is the tax statement that we or your investment provider sends you after the end of each calendar year. It details the distributions you received during the past year and shows their tax status. That statement, or a separate statement from us or your investment provider, covers your share transactions.

Most importantly, consult your tax professional. Everyone’s tax situation is different, and your tax professional should be able to help you answer any questions you may have.

Backup Withholding

The Fund is required to withhold at the backup withholding rate from the money you are otherwise entitled to receive from its distributions and redemption proceeds (regardless of whether you realized a gain or loss) if you are an individual or certain other non-corporate shareholder who fails to provide a correct taxpayer identification number to the Fund. Withholding at that rate also is required from the Fund’s distributions to which you are otherwise entitled if you are such a shareholder and the Internal Revenue Service tells us that you are subject to backup withholding or you are subject to backup withholding for any other reason.

If you use an investment provider, you must supply your signed taxpayer identification number form (generally Form W-9) to your investment provider, and it must supply its taxpayer identification number to us, in order to avoid backup withholding.

Buying Shares Before a Distribution

The money the Fund earns, either as net income or as net capital gains, is reflected in its share price until it distributes the money. At that time, the amount of the distribution is deducted from the share price. Because of this, if you buy shares of the Fund just before it makes a distribution, you will end up getting some of your investment back as a taxable distribution. You can avoid this situation by waiting to invest until after the record date for the distribution.

Generally, if you are investing in the Fund through a tax-advantaged retirement plan or are otherwise an exempt investor, there are no current tax consequences to you from distributions.

Basis Determination and Reporting

Your basis in Fund shares acquired after December 31, 2011 (collectively, “Covered Shares”) will be determined in accordance with the Fund’s default method, which is average basis, unless you affirmatively elect in writing (which may be electronic) to use a different method acceptable to the Internal Revenue Service. The basis determination method may not be changed with respect to a redemption of Covered Shares after the settlement date of the redemption. The Fund must report to the Internal Revenue Service and furnish to its shareholders the basis information for Covered Shares. See “Additional Tax Information” in the SAI for more information about the rules regarding basis determination and the Fund’s reporting obligation. You should consult with your tax professional to determine the best basis determination method for your tax situation and to obtain more information about how the basis determination law applies to you.

Market Timing Policy

Frequent purchases, exchanges and redemptions of Fund shares (“market-timing activities”) can interfere with effective Fund management and adversely affect Fund performance in various ways, including by requiring a portfolio manager to liquidate portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time or price, by increasing costs (such as brokerage costs) to the Fund by requiring a portfolio manager to effect more frequent purchases and sales of portfolio securities, and possibly by requiring a portfolio manager to keep a larger portion of Fund assets in cash, all of which could adversely affect the interests of long-term shareholders. To discourage market-timing activities by Fund shareholders, the Board of Trustees has adopted market-timing policies and has approved the procedures of the principal underwriter for implementing those policies. As described earlier in this prospectus, pursuant to such policies, the exchange privilege can be withdrawn from any investor that is believed to be “timing the market” or is otherwise making exchanges judged to be excessive. In furtherance of these policies, under certain circumstances, the Fund reserves the right to reject any exchange or purchase order, or change, suspend or revoke the exchange privilege.

Neuberger Berman Management LLC applies the Funds’ policies and procedures with respect to market-timing activities by monitoring trading activity in the Fund, identifying excessive trading patterns, and warning or prohibiting shareholders who trade excessively from making further purchases or exchanges of Fund shares. These policies and procedures are applied consistently to all shareholders. Although the Fund makes efforts to monitor for market-timing activities, the ability of the Fund to monitor trades that are placed by the underlying shareholders of omnibus accounts maintained by brokers, retirement plan accounts and other approved intermediaries may be limited in those instances in which the investment intermediary maintains the underlying shareholder accounts. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to eliminate all market-timing activities.

Portfolio Holdings Policy

A description of the Fund's policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of the Fund's portfolio holdings is available in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

The complete portfolio holdings for the Fund is available at www.nb.com/holdings. The complete portfolio holdings for the Fund is generally posted 15-30 days after each month-end.

The Fund’s complete portfolio holdings will remain available at this website until the subsequent month-end holdings have been posted. Complete portfolio holdings for the Fund will also be available in reports on Form N-Q and Form N-CSR filed with the SEC. Historical portfolio holdings are available upon request.

Fund Structure

The Fund uses a “multiple class” structure. The Fund offers one or more classes of shares that have identical investment programs, but different arrangements for distribution and shareholder servicing and, consequently, different expenses. This prospectus relates solely to the Class R6 shares of the Fund.

NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

Class R6 Shares

If you would like further details on this Fund you can request a free copy of the following documents:

Shareholder Reports. The shareholder reports offer information about the Fund, including:

■	a discussion by the Portfolio Managers about strategies and market conditions that significantly affected the Fund’s performance during the last fiscal year or fiscal period
■	Fund performance data and financial statements
■	portfolio holdings.

Statement of Additional Information (SAI). The SAI contains more comprehensive information on the Fund, including:

■	various types of securities and practices, and their risks
■	investment limitations and additional policies
■	information about the Fund’s management and business structure.

The SAI is hereby incorporated by reference into this prospectus, making it legally part of the prospectus.

Manager: Neuberger Berman Management LLC

Adviser: NB Alternative Investment Management LLC

Obtaining Information

You can obtain a shareholder report, SAI, and other information from your investment provider, or from:

Neuberger Berman Management LLC

605 Third Avenue 2nd Floor

New York, NY 10158-0180

877-628-2583

Website: www.nb.com

You can also request copies of this information from the SEC for the cost of a duplicating fee by sending an e-mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. They are also available from the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

You may also view and copy the documents at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington.

Call 202-551-8090 for information about the operation of the Public Reference Room.

The Fund’s current net asset value per share is made available at https://www.nb.com/funds/mutual_funds/ (click on “Prices”, select asset class “Alternative” from the drop-down menu, and then select a share class from the drop-down menu).

The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. “Neuberger Berman Management LLC” and the individual Fund name in this prospectus are either service marks or registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Management LLC. © 2013 Neuberger Berman Management LLC. All rights reserved.

SEC file number: 811-21715

N0392 12/13

NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2013 (AS AMENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013)

Fund	Institutional Class	Class A	Class C	Class R6
Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi- Manager Fund	NABIX	NABCX	NABAX	NRABX

605 Third Avenue, 2 nd Floor, New York, NY 10158-0180

Shareholder Services

800.877.9700

Institutional Services

800.366.6264

www.nb.com

Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund ( the “Fund”) is a mutual fund that offers shares pursuant to prospectuses dated February 28, 2013 and December 31, 2013. The prospectus and summary prospectus (together, the “Prospectus”) for your share class provide more information about the Fund that you should know before investing. You can get a free copy of the Prospectus, annual report and/or semi-annual report for the Fund from Neuberger Berman Management LLC (“NB Management”), 605 Third Avenue, 2 nd Floor, New York, NY 10158-0180, or by calling the appropriate number listed above for your share class. You should read the Prospectus for your share class and consider the investment objective, risks and fees and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing.

This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is not a prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus. This SAI is not an offer to sell any shares of any class of the Fund. A written offer can be made only by a Prospectus.

The Fund’s financial statements, notes thereto and the report of its independent registered public accounting firm are incorporated by reference from the Fund’s annual report to shareholders into (and are therefore legally part of) this SAI.

No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations not contained in the Prospectus or in this SAI in connection with the offering made by the

Prospectus and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Fund or its distributor. The Prospectus and this SAI do not constitute an offering by the Fund or its distributor in any jurisdiction in which such offering may not lawfully be made.

The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. “Neuberger Berman Management LLC” and the Fund name in this SAI are either service marks or registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Management LLC. ©2013 Neuberger Berman Management LLC. All rights reserved. ©2013 NB Alternative Investment Management LLC. All rights reserved. ©2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

INVESTMENT INFORMATION		5
	Investment Policies and Limitations	5
	Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions	8
	Additional Investment Information	8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION		64

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS		64
	Information about the Board of Trustees	64
	Information about the Officers of the Trust	69

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES		81
	Investment Manager and Administrator	81
	Management and Administration Fees	83
	Fund Accounting Agent	84
	Contractual Expense Limitations	84
	Voluntary Expense Limitations	85
	Adviser and Subadvisers	85
	Portfolio Manager Information	87
	Other Investment Companies or Accounts Managed	91
	Codes of Ethics	92
	Management and Control of NB Management and NBAIM	92

DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS		93
	Distributor	93
	Revenue Sharing	94
	Distribution Plan (Class A Only)	96
	Distribution Plan (Class C Only)	96
	Distribution Plan (Class A and Class C)	97

ADDITIONAL PURCHASE INFORMATION		98
	Share Prices and Net Asset Value	98
	Subscriptions in Kind	100
	Financial Intermediaries	100
	Automatic Investing and Dollar Cost Averaging	100
	Sales Charges	100

ADDITIONAL EXCHANGE INFORMATION		102

ADDITIONAL REDEMPTION INFORMATION		103
	Suspension of Redemptions	103
	Redemptions in Kind	104
	Abandoned Property	104

iii

CONVERSION INFORMATION		104

DIVIDENDS AND OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS		104

ADDITIONAL TAX INFORMATION		105
	Taxation of the Fund	105
	Taxation of the Fund’s Shareholders	111

FUND TRANSACTIONS		113
	Expense Offset Arrangement	116
	Portfolio Turnover	116
	Proxy Voting	116

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS DISCLOSURE		117
	Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Policy	117
	Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Procedures	118
	Portfolio Holdings Approved Recipients	118

REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS		120

ORGANIZATION, CAPITALIZATION AND OTHER MATTERS		120

CUSTODIAN AND TRANSFER AGENT		121

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		121

LEGAL COUNSEL		122

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES		122

REGISTRATION STATEMENT		123

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		123

APPENDIX A – LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM DEBT SECURITIES RATING DESCRIPTIONS		A-1

APPENDIX B – SALES CHARGE REDUCTIONS AND WAIVERS		B-1

APPENDIX C – SUBADVISER PROXY VOTING POLICIES		C-1

INVESTMENT INFORMATION

The Fund is a separate operating series of Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds (“Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust since February 15, 2005, that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an open-end management investment company.

The Fund commenced operations on May 15, 2012.

The following information supplements the discussion of the Fund’s investment objective, policies, and limitations in the Prospectus. The investment objective and, unless otherwise specified, the investment policies and limitations of the Fund are not fundamental. Any investment objective, policy, or limitation that is not fundamental may be changed by the trustees of the Trust (“Fund Trustees”) without shareholder approval. The fundamental investment policies and limitations of the Fund may not be changed without the approval of the lesser of:

(1) 67% of the units of beneficial interest (“shares”) of the Fund present at a meeting at which more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are present or represented, or

(2) a majority of the outstanding shares of the Fund.

These percentages are required by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”), and are referred to in this SAI as a “1940 Act majority vote.”

NB Management has delegated day-to-day management of the assets of the Fund to NB Alternative Investment Management LLC (“NBAIM” or “Adviser”), which is responsible for allocating the assets of the Fund to several subadvisers (each a “Subadviser”, collectively the “Subadvisers”). Throughout this SAI, the term “Manager” refers to NB Management, NBAIM or the Subadvisers, as appropriate.

Investment Policies and Limitations

Except as set forth in the investment limitation on borrowing and the investment limitation on illiquid securities, any investment policy or limitation that involves a maximum percentage of securities or assets will not be considered exceeded unless the percentage limitation is exceeded immediately after, and because of, a transaction by the Fund. If events subsequent to a transaction result in the Fund exceeding the percentage limitation on illiquid securities, the Manager will take appropriate steps to reduce the percentage held in illiquid securities, as may be required by law, within a reasonable amount of time.

The following investment policies and limitations are fundamental:

1. Borrowing . The Fund may not borrow money, except that the Fund may (i) borrow money from banks for temporary or emergency purposes and for leveraging or investment and (ii) enter into reverse repurchase agreements for any purpose; provided that (i) and (ii) in

combination do not exceed 33-1/3% of the value of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). If at any time borrowings exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the Fund’s total assets, the Fund will reduce its borrowings within three days (excluding Sundays and holidays) to the extent necessary to comply with the 33-1/3% limitation.

2. Commodities . The Fund may not purchase physical commodities, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any applicable exemptive relief or unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, but this restriction shall not prohibit the Fund from purchasing futures contracts, options, foreign currencies or forward contracts, swaps, caps, collars, floors and other financial instruments or from investing in securities of any kind.

3. Industry Concentration . The Fund may not purchase any security if, as a result, 25% or more of its total assets (taken at current value) would be invested in the securities of issuers having their principal business activities in the same industry. This limitation does not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities (“U.S. Government and Agency Securities”), securities of other investment companies and tax-exempt securities or such other securities as may be excluded for this purpose under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any applicable exemptive relief.

4. Lending. The Fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33-1/3% of its total assets (taken at current value) would be lent to other parties, except, in accordance with its investment objective, policies, and limitations, (i) through the purchase of a portion of an issue of debt securities, loans, loan participations or other forms of direct debt instruments or (ii) by engaging in repurchase agreements.

5. Real Estate . The Fund may not purchase real estate unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, but this restriction shall not prohibit the Fund from purchasing securities issued by entities or investment vehicles that own or deal in real estate or interests therein or instruments secured by real estate or interests therein.

6. Senior Securities . The Fund may not issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act.

7. Underwriting . The Fund may not underwrite securities of other issuers, except to the extent that the Fund, in disposing of portfolio securities, may be deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”).

For purposes of the limitation on commodities, the restriction does not prevent the Fund from investing in a wholly owned subsidiary, thereby gaining exposure to the investment returns of commodities markets within the limitations of the federal tax requirements, or from investing in commodity-linked derivative instruments.

For purposes of the limitation on commodities, the Fund does not consider foreign currencies or forward contracts to be physical commodities.

For purposes of the Fund’s industry concentration policy, the Fund will not exclude tax-exempt securities that are issued by municipalities to finance non-governmental projects, such as

hospitals (i.e., private activity bonds or industrial revenue bonds), from the industry concentration policy.

The Fund has the following fundamental investment policy:

Notwithstanding any other investment policy of the Fund, the Fund may invest all of its investable assets (cash, securities, and receivables relating to securities) in an open-end management investment company having substantially the same investment objective, policies, and limitations as the Fund.

The following investment policies and limitations are non-fundamental:

1. Lending . Except for the purchase of debt securities, loans, loan participations or other forms of direct debt instruments and engaging in repurchase agreements, the Fund may not make any loans other than securities loans.

2. Margin Transactions . The Fund may not purchase securities on margin from brokers or other lenders, except that the Fund may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of securities transactions. Margin payments in connection with transactions in futures contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute the purchase of securities on margin and shall not be deemed to violate the foregoing limitation.

3. Illiquid Securities . The Fund may not purchase any security if, as a result, more than 15% of its net assets would be invested in illiquid securities. Illiquid securities include securities that cannot be sold within seven days in the ordinary course of business for approximately the amount at which the Fund has valued the securities, such as repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days.

4. Investments in Any One Issuer . At the close of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year, (i) no more than 25% of the value of its total assets may be invested in the securities of a single issuer and (ii) with regard to 50% of the value of its total assets, no more than 5% of the value of its total assets may be invested in the securities of a single issuer. These limitations do not apply to government securities, as defined for purposes of Subchapter M of Chapter 1 of Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”), or securities of another “regulated investment company” (as defined in section 851 (a) of the Code) (“RIC”).

5. Investment by a Fund of Funds. If shares of the Fund are purchased by another fund in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act, for so long as shares of the underlying Fund are held by such fund, the underlying Fund will not purchase securities of registered open-end investment companies or registered unit investment trusts in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F) or Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act.

Senior Securities: The SEC has taken the position that certain instruments that create future obligations may be considered senior securities subject to provisions of the 1940 Act that limit the ability of investment companies to issue senior securities. Common examples include reverse repurchase agreements, short sales, futures and options positions, forward contracts and when-issued securities. However, the SEC has clarified that, if a fund segregates cash or liquid securities sufficient to cover such obligations or holds off-setting positions (or, in some cases,

uses a combination of such strategies), the SEC will not raise senior securities issues under the 1940 Act.

Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions

For temporary defensive purposes, or to manage cash pending investment or payout, the Fund may invest up to 100% of its total assets in cash or cash equivalents, U.S. Government and Agency Securities, commercial paper, money market funds, and certain other money market instruments, as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by the foregoing. The Fund may also use put options including purchasing puts on security indices and put spreads on indices (i.e., buying and selling an equal number of puts on the same index with differing strike prices or expiration dates) for defensive purposes.

In reliance on an SEC exemptive rule, the Fund may invest an unlimited amount of its uninvested cash and cash collateral received in connection with securities lending in shares of money market funds and unregistered funds that operate in compliance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, whether or not advised by NB Management or an affiliate, under specified conditions. Among other things, the conditions preclude the Fund from paying a sales charge, as defined in rule 2830(b) of the NASD Conduct Rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) (“sales charge”), or a service fee, as defined in that rule, in connection with its purchase or redemption of the money market fund’s or unregistered fund’s shares, or the Fund’s investment adviser must waive a sufficient amount of its advisory fee to offset any such sales charge or service fee.

Additional Investment Information

The Fund may buy the types of securities and use the investment techniques described below, subject to any applicable investment policies and limitations. However, the Fund may not buy all of the types of securities or use all of the investment techniques described below. The Fund’s principal investment strategies and the principal risks of the Fund’s principal investment strategies are discussed in the Prospectus.

Asset-Backed Securities . Asset-backed securities represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of assets such as, among other things, motor vehicle installment sales contracts, installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and receivables from revolving credit (credit card) agreements, or a combination of the foregoing. These assets are securitized through the use of trusts and special purpose corporations. Credit enhancements, such as various forms of cash collateral accounts or letters of credit, may support payments of principal and interest on asset-backed securities. Although these securities may be supported by letters of credit or other credit enhancements, payment of interest and principal ultimately depends upon individuals paying the underlying loans, which may be affected adversely by general downturns in the economy. Asset-backed securities are subject to the same risk of prepayment described with respect to mortgage-backed securities and to extension risk (the risk that an issuer of a security will make principal payments slower than anticipated by the investor, thus extending the securities’ duration). The risk that recovery on repossessed collateral might be unavailable or inadequate to support payments, however, is greater for asset-backed securities than for mortgage-backed securities.

Certificates for Automobile Receivables SM (“CARS SM ”) represent undivided fractional interests in a trust whose assets consist of a pool of motor vehicle retail installment sales contracts and security interests in the vehicles securing those contracts. Payments of principal and interest on the underlying contracts are passed through monthly to certificate holders and are guaranteed up to specified amounts by a letter of credit issued by a financial institution unaffiliated with the trustee or originator of the trust. Underlying installment sales contracts are subject to prepayment, which may reduce the overall return to certificate holders. Certificate holders also may experience delays in payment or losses on CARS SM if the trust does not realize the full amounts due on underlying installment sales contracts because of unanticipated legal or administrative costs of enforcing the contracts; depreciation, damage, or loss of the vehicles securing the contracts; or other factors.

Credit card receivable securities are backed by receivables from revolving credit card agreements (“Accounts”). Credit balances on Accounts are generally paid down more rapidly than are automobile contracts. Most of the credit card receivable securities issued publicly to date have been pass-through certificates. In order to lengthen their maturity or duration, most such securities provide for a fixed period during which only interest payments on the underlying Accounts are passed through to the security holder; principal payments received on the Accounts are used to fund the transfer of additional credit card charges made on the Accounts to the pool of assets supporting the securities. Usually, the initial fixed period may be shortened if specified events occur which signal a potential deterioration in the quality of the assets backing the security, such as the imposition of a cap on interest rates. An issuer’s ability to extend the life of an issue of credit card receivable securities thus depends on the continued generation of principal amounts in the underlying Accounts and the non-occurrence of the specified events. The non-deductibility of consumer interest, as well as competitive and general economic factors, could adversely affect the rate at which new receivables are created in an Account and conveyed to an issuer, thereby shortening the expected weighted average life of the related security and reducing its yield. An acceleration in cardholders’ payment rates or any other event that shortens the period during which additional credit card charges on an Account may be transferred to the pool of assets supporting the related security could have a similar effect on its weighted average life and yield.

Credit cardholders are entitled to the protection of state and federal consumer credit laws. Many of those laws give a holder the right to set off certain amounts against balances owed on the credit card, thereby reducing amounts paid on Accounts. In addition, unlike the collateral for most other asset-backed securities, Accounts are unsecured obligations of the cardholder.

The Fund may invest in trust preferred securities, which are a type of asset-backed security. Trust preferred securities represent interests in a trust formed by a parent company to finance its operations. The trust sells preferred shares and invests the proceeds in debt securities of the parent. This debt may be subordinated and unsecured. Dividend payments on the trust preferred securities match the interest payments on the debt securities; if no interest is paid on the debt securities, the trust will not make current payments on its preferred securities. Unlike typical asset-backed securities, which have many underlying payors and are usually overcollateralized, trust preferred securities have only one underlying payor and are not overcollateralized. Issuers of trust preferred securities and their parents currently enjoy favorable

tax treatment. If the tax characterization of trust preferred securities were to change, they could be redeemed by the issuers, which could result in a loss to the Fund.

Banking and Savings Institution Securities . These include CDs, time deposits, bankers’ acceptances, and other short-term and long-term debt obligations issued by commercial banks and savings institutions. The CDs, time deposits, and bankers’ acceptances in which the Fund invests typically are not covered by deposit insurance.

A certificate of deposit is a short-term negotiable certificate issued by a commercial bank against funds deposited in the bank and is either interest-bearing or purchased on a discount basis. A bankers’ acceptance is a short-term draft drawn on a commercial bank by a borrower, usually in connection with an international commercial transaction. The borrower is liable for payment as is the bank, which unconditionally guarantees to pay the draft at its face amount on the maturity date. Fixed time deposits are obligations of branches of U.S. banks or foreign banks that are payable at a stated maturity date and bear a fixed rate of interest. Although fixed time deposits do not have a market, there are no contractual restrictions on the right to transfer a beneficial interest in the deposit to a third party. Deposit notes are notes issued by commercial banks that generally bear fixed rates of interest and typically have original maturities ranging from eighteen months to five years.

Banks are subject to extensive governmental regulations that may limit both the amounts and types of loans and other financial commitments that may be made and the interest rates and fees that may be charged. The profitability of this industry is largely dependent upon the availability and cost of capital, which can fluctuate significantly when interest rates change. Also, general economic conditions, consolidation and competition among banking and savings institutions play an important part in the operations of this industry and exposure to credit losses arising from possible financial difficulties of borrowers might affect a bank’s ability to meet its obligations. Bank obligations may be general obligations of the parent bank or may be limited to the issuing branch by the terms of the specific obligations or by government regulation.

In response to the 2008 financial turmoil, the U.S. Government is taking a variety of measures to increase the regulation of depository institutions and their holding companies. On July 21, 2010, the President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which significantly impacts the financial services industry, including more stringent regulation of depository institutions and their holding companies. Federal regulatory agencies are in the process of developing regulations to implement many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions, so the full impact and compliance burden on the operations and profitability of depository institutions and their holding companies is not yet clear and will not likely be clear for years to come. Based on the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and anticipated implementing regulations, depository institutions and their holding companies are likely to be subject to significantly increased regulatory and compliance obligations. Accordingly, investments in bank paper may not yield expected returns because the increased regulation may significantly curtail the operations and profitability of depository institutions and their holding companies.

In addition, securities of foreign banks and foreign branches of U.S. banks may involve investment risks in addition to those relating to domestic bank obligations. Such risks include future political and economic developments, the possible seizure or nationalization of foreign deposits, and the possible adoption of foreign governmental restrictions that might adversely affect the payment of principal and interest on such obligations. In addition, foreign banks and foreign branches of U.S. banks may be subject to less stringent reserve requirements and non-U.S. issuers generally are subject to different accounting, auditing, reporting and recordkeeping standards than those applicable to U.S. issuers.

Collateralized Loan Obligations. The Fund also may invest in collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), which are another type of asset-backed security. A CLO is a trust or other special purpose entity that is comprised of or collateralized by a pool of loans, including domestic and non-U.S. senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. The loans generate cash flow that is allocated among one or more classes of securities (“tranches”) that vary in risk and yield. The most senior tranche has the best credit quality and the lowest yield compared to the other tranches. The equity tranche has the highest potential yield but also has the greatest risk, as it bears the bulk of defaults from the underlying loans and helps to protect the more senior tranches from risk of these defaults. However, despite the protection from the equity and other more junior tranches, more senior tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults and decreased market value due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults, as well as aversion to CLO securities as a class.

Normally, CLOs are privately offered and sold and are not registered under state or federal securities laws. Therefore, investments in CLOs may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market may exist for CLOs allowing a CLO to qualify for transactions pursuant to Rule 144A under the 1933 Act. CLOs normally charge management fees and administrative expenses, which are in addition to those of the Fund.

The riskiness of investing in CLOs depends largely on the quality and type of the collateral loans and the tranche of the CLO in which the Fund invests. In addition to the normal risks associated with fixed-income securities discussed elsewhere in this SAI and the Fund’s prospectus (such as interest rate risk and credit risk), CLOs carry risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from the collateral will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the Fund may invest in CLO tranches that are subordinate to other tranches; and (iv) the complex structure of the CLO may not be fully understood at the time of investment or may result in the quality of the underlying collateral not being fully understood and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results. In addition, interest on certain tranches of a CLO may be paid in-kind (meaning that unpaid interest is effectively added to principal), which involves continued exposure to default risk with respect to such payments. Certain CLOs may receive credit enhancement in the form of a senior-subordinate structure, over-collateralization or bond insurance, but such enhancement may not always be present and may fail to protect the Fund against the risk of loss due to defaults on the collateral. Certain CLOs may not hold loans directly, but rather, use derivatives such as swaps to create “synthetic” exposure to the collateral

pool of loans. Such CLOs entail the risks of derivative instruments described elsewhere in this SAI.

Commercial Paper . Commercial paper is a short-term debt security issued by a corporation, bank, municipality, or other issuer, usually for purposes such as financing current operations. The Fund may invest in commercial paper that cannot be resold to the public without an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act. While some restricted commercial paper normally is deemed illiquid, the Manager may in certain cases determine that such paper is liquid, pursuant to guidelines established by the Fund Trustees.

Policies and Limitations . To the extent restricted commercial paper is deemed illiquid, purchases thereof will be subject to the Fund’s 15% limitation on investments in illiquid securities. The Fund may invest in commercial paper only if it has received the highest rating from Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) (A-1) or Moody’s Investors Service Inc. (“Moody’s”) (P-1) or is deemed by the Manager to be of comparable quality. The Fund may also invest in such commercial paper as a defensive measure, to increase liquidity, or as needed for segregated assets.

Wholly Owned Subsidiary . As described in the Prospectus, the Fund may, if a subadviser is selected for a related strategy, invest a portion of its assets in a wholly owned subsidiary organized as an exempted company under the laws of the Cayman Islands (“Subsidiary”). The Fund would invest in the Subsidiary in order to gain exposure to the commodities markets within the limitations of Subchapter M of the Code applicable to RICs. The Fund would maintain no more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the Subsidiary at the end of every quarter of its taxable year. The Subsidiary’s commodity-linked investments (including commodity-linked futures contracts, structured notes, swaps and options) would be expected to produce leveraged exposure to the performance of the commodities markets. The Subsidiary also may invest in money market funds, fixed income securities and other instruments that may serve as collateral for its commodity-linked positions and may hold cash or cash equivalents.

The Subsidiary would be overseen by its own board of directors and will not be registered under the 1940 Act and will not be subject to its investor protections, except as noted in the Fund’s Prospectus or this SAI. The Fund, as the sole shareholder of the Subsidiary, would not have all of the protections afforded by the 1940 Act. However, the Subsidiary would be wholly owned and controlled by the Fund, and the Fund Trustees would maintain oversight responsibility for investment activities of the Subsidiary generally (with respect to compliance and investment policies and procedures) as if the Subsidiary’s investments were held directly by the Fund. Furthermore, NB Management would be responsible for the Subsidiary’s day-to-day business pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement between the Subsidiary and NB Management. Therefore, the Fund’s ownership and control of the Subsidiary would make it unlikely that the Subsidiary would take any action contrary to the interests of the Fund or its shareholders. Under the Investment Management Agreement with the Subsidiary, NB Management would provide the Subsidiary with the same type of management services, under the same terms, as are provided to the Fund under its Investment Management Agreement therewith. NB Management would engage NBAIM as investment adviser of the Subsidiary to choose the Subsidiary’s investments and handle its day-to-day business. NBAIM also may engage subadvisers to choose the Subsidiary’s investments. The Subsidiary also would contract with service providers to provide custody and other services to the Subsidiary.

In managing the Subsidiary’s investment portfolio, and in adhering to the Fund’s compliance policies and procedures, NB Management would treat the assets of the Subsidiary generally as if the assets were held directly by the Fund. NB Management would also treat the assets of the Subsidiary generally as if the assets were held directly by the Fund with respect to its adherence to the Fund’s investment policies and restrictions.

The Subsidiary would bear the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the custody services that it receives. The Fund expects that these expenses borne by the Subsidiary would not be material in relation to the value of the Fund’s assets.

The financial information of the Subsidiary would be consolidated into the Fund’s financial statements, as contained within the Fund’s Annual and Semiannual Reports provided to shareholders. Changes in U.S. laws (where the Fund is organized) and/or the Cayman Islands (where the Subsidiary is organized), could prevent the Fund and/or the Subsidiary from operating as described in the Fund’s Prospectus and this SAI and could negatively affect the Fund and its shareholders. For example, the Cayman Islands has undertaken not to impose certain taxes on the Subsidiary, including any income, corporate or capital gains tax, estate duty, inheritance tax, gift tax or withholding tax. If the Subsidiary’s exemption from those taxes were revoked, thus requiring the Subsidiary to pay Cayman Islands taxes, the investment returns of the Fund would likely decrease.

By investing in the Subsidiary, the Fund would be indirectly exposed to the risks associated with the Subsidiary’s investments. The derivatives and other investments that may be held by the Subsidiary would provide exposure similar to that held by the Fund and would be subject to the same risks that apply to similar investments if held directly by the Fund.

Commodities Related Investments . Although the Fund may not purchase precious metals (such as gold, silver or platinum) or other physical commodities or contracts thereon, the Fund may purchase securities backed by physical commodities, including interests in exchange-traded investment trusts and other similar entities, the value of the shares of which relates directly to the value of precious metals or other physical commodities held by the entity. As an investor in such an entity, the Fund would indirectly bear its pro rata share of the entity’s expenses, which may include storage and other costs relating to the entity’s investments in physical commodities. In addition, the Fund will not qualify as a RIC in a taxable year in which more than 10% of its gross income consists of certain “non-qualifying” income, which includes gains resulting from selling physical commodities (or options or futures contracts thereon unless the gain is realized from certain hedging transactions) and certain other non-passive income. See “Additional Tax Information.” The Fund’s investment in securities backed by, or in such entities that invest in, physical commodities, other than shares of the Subsidiary, generally would produce income that would be subject to this 10% limitation. To remain within this limitation, the Fund may hold such an investment or sell it at a loss, or sell other investments, when for investment reasons it would not otherwise do so. The availability of such measures does not guarantee that the Fund would be able to satisfy the requirements of the Code.

Exposure to physical commodities may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. The value of such investments may be affected by overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates, or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity, such as supply and demand, drought, floods, weather,

embargoes, tariffs and international economic, political and regulatory developments. Their value may also respond to investor perception of instability in the national or international economy, whether or not justified by the facts. However, these investments may help to moderate fluctuations in the value of the Fund’s other holdings, because these investments may not correlate with investments in traditional securities. Economic and other events (whether real or perceived) can reduce the demand for commodities, which may reduce market prices and cause the value of the Fund’s shares to fall. No active trading market may exist for certain commodities investments, which may impair the ability of the Fund to sell or realize the full value of such investments in the event of the need to liquidate such investments. Certain commodities are subject to limited pricing flexibility because of supply and demand factors. Others are subject to broad price fluctuations as a result of the volatility of the prices for certain raw materials and the instability of supplies of other materials. These additional variables may create additional investment risks and result in greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Because physical commodities do not generate investment income, the return on investments therein will be derived solely from the appreciation or depreciation on such investments. Certain types of commodities instruments (such as commodity-linked swaps and commodity-linked structured notes) are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the instrument will not perform or will be unable to perform in accordance with the terms of the instrument.

The commodity-related investments of the Subsidiary (as defined above) would not generally be subject to U.S. laws (including securities laws) and their protections. Further, they will be subject to the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, which can be adversely affected by developments in that jurisdiction.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund may not purchase precious metals or other physical commodities or other contracts thereon, unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments. This does not prohibit the Fund from purchasing futures contracts, options, foreign currencies or forward contracts, swaps, caps, floors, collars and other financial instruments or from investing in securities of any kind. However, the Fund may purchase securities backed by physical commodities, including interests in exchange-traded investment trusts and other similar entities, the value of the shares of which relates directly to the value of precious metals or other physical commodities held by such an entity. The Fund does not intend to sell such investments when doing so would cause it to fail to qualify as a RIC.

Convertible Securities . The Fund may invest in convertible securities. A convertible security is a bond, debenture, note, preferred stock, or other security that may be converted into or exchanged for a prescribed amount of common stock of the same or a different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. Convertible securities generally have features of both common stocks and debt securities. A convertible security entitles the holder to receive the interest paid or accrued on debt or the dividend paid on preferred stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion, such securities ordinarily provide a stream of income with generally higher yields than common stocks of the same or similar issuers, but lower than the yield on non-convertible debt. Convertible securities are usually subordinated to comparable-tier non-convertible securities but rank senior to common stock in a corporation’s capital structure. The value of a convertible security is a function of (1) its yield in comparison to the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege and (2) its worth if converted into the underlying common stock.

The price of a convertible security often reflects variations in the price of the underlying common stock in a way that non-convertible debt may not. Convertible securities are typically issued by smaller capitalization companies whose stock prices may be volatile. A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by the Fund is called for redemption, the Fund will be required to convert it into the underlying common stock, sell it to a third party or permit the issuer to redeem the security. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives.

Policies and Limitations . Convertible securities are considered equity securities for purposes of any policy or limitation. Convertible debt securities are subject to the Fund’s investment policies and limitations concerning fixed income securities.

Direct Debt Instruments including Loans, Loan Assignments, and Loan Participations . Direct debt includes interests in loans, notes and other interests in amounts owed to financial institutions by borrowers, such as companies and governments, including emerging market countries. Direct debt instruments are interests in amounts owed by corporate, governmental, or other borrowers (including emerging market countries) to lenders or lending syndicates. Purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the borrower for payment of principal and interest. The borrower may be in financial distress or may default or have a right to borrow additional cash from the owners of direct debt. If the Fund does not receive scheduled interest or principal payments on such indebtedness, the Fund’s share price and yield could be adversely affected. Direct debt instruments may involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or intermediary. In addition, there may be fewer legal protections for owners of direct debt than conventional debt securities. Direct indebtedness of developing countries involves a risk that the governmental entities responsible for the repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to pay interest and repay principal when due. See the additional risks described under “Foreign Securities” in this SAI.

Direct debt instruments may have floating interest rates. These interest rates will vary depending on the terms of the underlying loan and market conditions.

Policies and Limitations. To the extent direct debt is deemed illiquid, such purchases thereof will be subject to the Fund’s 15% limitation on investments in illiquid securities.

Loans, Loan Assignments, and Loan Participations. Floating rate securities , including loans, provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate at fixed intervals ( e.g ., daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually) or automatic adjustment of the interest rate whenever a specified interest rate or index changes. The interest rate on floating rate securities ordinarily is determined by reference to LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), a particular bank’s prime rate, the 90-day U.S. Treasury Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank CDs, an index of short-term tax-exempt rates or some other objective measure.

Loan interests are a form of direct debt instrument in which the Fund may invest by taking an assignment of all or a portion of an interest in a loan previously held by another institution or by acquiring a participation in an interest in a loan that continues to be held by another institution. The Fund may invest in secured and unsecured loans. Many banks have

been weakened by the recent financial crisis, and it may be difficult for the Fund to obtain an accurate picture of a lending bank’s financial condition. Loans are subject to the same risks as other direct debt instruments discussed above and carry additional risks described in this section.

Assignments . When the Fund purchases a loan by assignment, the Fund typically succeeds to the rights of the assigning lender under the loan agreement and becomes a lender under the loan agreement. Subject to the terms of the loan agreement, the Fund typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations under the loan agreement of the assigning lender. However, assignments may be arranged through private negotiations between potential assignees and potential assignors, and the rights and obligations acquired by the purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the assigning lender.

Participation Interests . The Fund's rights under a participation interest with respect to a particular loan may be more limited than the rights of original lenders or of investors who acquire an assignment of that loan. In purchasing participation interests, the Fund will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation interest (the “participating lender”) and only when the participating lender receives the payments from the borrower.

In a participation interest, the Fund will usually have a contractual relationship only with the selling institution and not the underlying borrower. The Fund normally will have to rely on the participating lender to demand and receive payments in respect of the loans, and to pay those amounts on to the Fund; thus, the Fund will be subject to the risk that the lender may be unwilling or unable to do so. In such a case, the Fund would not likely have any rights against the borrower directly. In addition, the Fund generally will have no right to object to certain changes to the loan agreement agreed to by the participating lender.

In buying a participation interest, the Fund might not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the related loan and may be subject to any rights of set off the borrower has against the selling institution. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the borrower, the obligation of the borrower to repay the loan may be subject to certain defenses that can be asserted by the borrower as a result of any improper conduct of the participating lender. As a result, the Fund may be subject to delays, expenses and risks that are greater than those that exist when the Fund is an original lender or assignee.

Creditworthiness . The Fund ’s ability to receive payments in connection with loans depends on the financial condition of the borrower . The Manager will not rely solely on another lending institution’s credit analysis of the borrower, but will perform its own investment analysis of the borrower. The Manager’s analysis may include consideration of the borrower’s financial strength, managerial experience, debt coverage, additional borrowing requirements or debt maturity schedules, changing financial conditions, and responsiveness to changes in business conditions and interest rates. Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. In connection with the restructuring of a loan or other direct debt instrument outside of bankruptcy court in a negotiated work-out or in the context of bankruptcy

proceedings, equity securities or junior debt securities may be received in exchange for all or a portion of an interest in the security.

In buying a participation interest, the Fund assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the participating lender. If the participating lender fails to perform its obligations under the participation agreement, the Fund might incur costs and delays in realizing payment and suffer a loss of principal and/or interest. If a participating lender becomes insolvent, the Fund may be treated as a general creditor of that lender. As a general creditor, the Fund may not benefit from a right of set off that the lender has against the borrower. The Fund will acquire a participation interest only if the Manager determines that the participating lender or other intermediary participant selling the participation interest is creditworthy.

Ratings . Loan interests may not be rated by independent rating agencies and therefore, investments in a particular loan participation may depend almost exclusively on the credit analysis of the borrower performed by the Manager.

Agents. Loans are typically administered by a bank, insurance company, finance company or other financial institution (the “agent”) for a lending syndicate of financial institutions. In a typical loan, the agent administers the terms of the loan agreement and is responsible for the collection of principal and interest and fee payments from the borrower and the apportionment of these payments to all lenders that are parties to the loan agreement. In addition, an institution (which may be the agent) may hold collateral on behalf of the lenders. Typically, under loan agreements, the agent is given broad authority in monitoring the borrower’s performance and is obligated to use the same care it would use in the management of its own property. In asserting rights against a borrower, the Fund normally will be dependent on the willingness of the lead bank to assert these rights, or upon a vote of all the lenders to authorize the action.

If an agent becomes insolvent, or has a receiver, conservator, or similar official appointed for it by the appropriate regulatory authority, or becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, the agent’s appointment may be terminated and a successor agent would be appointed. If an appropriate regulator or court determines that assets held by the agent for the benefit of the purchasers of loans are subject to the claims of the agent’s general or secured creditors, the Fund might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on a loan or suffer a loss of principal and/or interest. The Fund may be subject to similar risks when it buys a participation interest or an assignment from an intermediary.

Collateral. Although most of the loans in which the Fund invests are secured, there is no assurance that the collateral can be promptly liquidated, or that its liquidation value will be equal to the value of the debt. In most loan agreements there is no formal requirement to pledge additional collateral if the value of the initial collateral declines . As a result, a loan may not always be fully collateralized and can decline significantly in value.

If a borrower becomes insolvent, access to collateral may be limited by bankruptcy and other laws. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy may pay only a small portion of the amount owed, if they are able to pay at all. If a secured loan is foreclosed, the Fund will likely be required to bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. There is also

a possibility that the Fund will become the owner of its pro rata share of the collateral which may carry additional risks and liabilities. In addition, under legal theories of lender liability, the Fund potentially might be held liable as a co-lender. In the event of a borrower’s bankruptcy or insolvency, the borrower’s obligation to repay the loan may be subject to certain defenses that the borrower can assert as a result of improper conduct by the Agent.

Some loans are unsecured. If the borrower defaults on an unsecured loan, the Fund will be a general creditor and will not have rights to any specific assets of the borrower.

Liquidity. Loans are generally subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Loans are not currently listed on any securities exchange or automatic quotation system. As a result, there may not be a recognized, liquid public market for loan interests.

Prepayment Risk and Maturity . Because many loans are repaid early, the actual maturity of loans is typically shorter than their stated final maturity calculated solely on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule. The degree to which borrowers prepay loans, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, may be affected by general business conditions, market interest rates, the borrower’s financial condition and competitive conditions among lenders. Such prepayments may require the Fund to replace an investment with a lower yielding security which may have an adverse affect on the Fund’s share price. Prepayments cannot be predicted with accuracy. Floating rate loans can be less sensitive to prepayment risk, but the Fund’s net asset value may still fluctuate in response to interest rate changes because variable interest rates may reset only periodically and may not rise or decline as much as interest rates in general.

Restrictive Covenants. A borrower must comply with various restrictive covenants in a loan agreement such as restrictions on dividend payments and limits on total debt. The loan agreement may also contain a covenant requiring the borrower to prepay the loan with any free cash flow. A breach of a covenant is normally an event of default, which provides the agent or the lenders the right to call the outstanding loan.

Fees and Expenses . Purchasers and sellers of loans may pay certain fees , such as an assignment fee. In addition, the Fund incurs expenses associated with researching and analyzing potential loan investments, including legal fees.

Available Information. Loans normally are not registered with the SEC or any state securities commission or listed on any securities exchange. As a result, the amount of public information available about a specific loan historically has been less extensive than if the loan were registered or exchange traded. They may also not be considered “securities,” and purchasers, such as the Fund, therefore may not be entitled to rely on the strong anti-fraud protections of the federal securities laws.

Leveraged Buy-Out Transactions. Loans purchased by the Fund may represent interests in loans made to finance highly leveraged corporate acquisitions, known as “leveraged buy-out” transactions, leveraged recapitalization loans and other types of acquisition financing. The highly leveraged capital structure of the borrowers in such transactions may make such loans especially vulnerable to adverse changes in economic or market conditions.

Junior Loans. The Fund may invest in second lien secured loans and secured and unsecured subordinated loans, including bridge loans (“Junior Loans”). In the event of a bankruptcy or liquidation, second lien secured loans are generally paid only if the value of the borrower’s collateral is sufficient to satisfy the borrower’s obligations to the first lien secured lenders and even then, the remaining collateral may not be sufficient to cover the amount owed to the Fund. Second lien secured loans give investors priority over general unsecured creditors in the event of an asset sale.

Junior Loans are subject to the same general risks inherent to any loan investment, including credit risk, market and liquidity risk, and interest rate risk. Due to their lower place in the borrower’s capital structure, Junior Loans involve a higher degree of overall risk than senior loans of the same borrower.

Bridge Loans. Bridge loans or bridge facilities are short-term loan arrangements ( e.g ., 12 to 18 months) typically made by a borrower in anticipation of intermediate-term or long-term permanent financing. Most bridge loans are structured as floating-rate debt with step-up provisions under which the interest rate on the bridge loan rises over time. Thus, the longer the loan remains outstanding , the more the interest rate increases. In addition, bridge loans commonly contain a conversion feature that allows the bridge loan investor to convert its loan interest into senior exchange notes if the loan has not been prepaid in full on or prior to its maturity date. Bridge loans may be subordinate to other debt and may be secured or unsecured. Like any loan, bridge loans involve credit risk. Bridge loans are generally made with the expectation that the borrower will be able to obtain permanent financing in the near future. Any delay in obtaining permanent financing subjects the bridge loan investor to increased risk. A borrower’s use of bridge loans also involves the risk that the borrower may be unable to locate permanent financing to replace the bridge loan, which may impair the borrower’s perceived creditworthiness. With the onset of the financial crisis in 2008, many borrowers found it more difficult to obtain loans, a situation that has been gradually improving.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund does not intend to invest in loan instruments that could require additional investments upon the borrower’s demand, but may invest in loans that require funding at a later date following the initial investment in the loan.

The Fund’s policies limit the percentage of its assets that can be invested in the securities of one issuer or in issuers primarily involved in one industry. Legal interpretations by the SEC staff may require the Fund to treat both the lending bank and the borrower as “issuers” of a loan participation by the Fund. In combination, the Fund’s policies and the SEC staff’s interpretations may limit the amount the Fund can invest in loan participations.

Distressed Securities. The Fund may invest in distressed securities, including loans, bonds and notes may involve a substantial degree of risk. Distressed securities include securities of companies that are in financial distress and that may be in or about to enter bankruptcy.

The Fund may invest in issuers of distressed securities that the Manager expects will make an exchange offer or will be the subject of a plan of reorganization that the Fund will receive new securities in return for the distressed securities. A significant period of time may pass between the time at which the Fund makes its investment in these distressed securities and

the time that any exchange offer or plan of reorganization is completed and there can be no assurance that such an exchange offer will be made or that such a plan of reorganization will be adopted. During this period, it is unlikely that a Fund will receive any interest payments on the distressed securities, the Fund will be subject to significant uncertainty as to whether or not the exchange offer or plan of reorganization will be completed and the Fund may be required to bear certain extraordinary expenses to protect and recover its investment. Therefore, to the extent the Fund seeks capital appreciation through investment in distressed securities, the Fund’s ability to achieve current income for its shareholders may be diminished.

The Fund also will be subject to significant uncertainty as to when and in what manner and for what value the obligations evidenced by the distressed securities will eventually be satisfied ( e.g. , through a liquidation of the obligor’s assets, an exchange offer or plan of reorganization involving the distressed securities or a payment of some amount in satisfaction of the obligation). Even if an exchange offer is made or plan of reorganization is adopted with respect to distressed securities held by the Fund, there can be no assurance that the securities or other assets received by a Fund in connection with such exchange offer or plan of reorganization will not have a lower value or income potential than may have been anticipated when the investment was made or no value. Moreover, any securities received by the Fund upon completion of an exchange offer or plan of reorganization may be restricted as to resale. Similarly, if the Fund participates in negotiations with respect to any exchange offer or plan of reorganization with respect to an issuer of distressed securities, the Fund may be restricted from disposing of such securities. To the extent that the Fund becomes involved in such proceedings, the Fund may have a more active participation in the affairs of the issuer than that assumed generally by an investor. The Fund, however, will not make investments for the purpose of exercising day-to-day management of any issuer’s affairs.

In certain periods, there may be little or no liquidity in the markets for distressed securities or other instruments. In addition, the prices of such securities may be subject to periods of abrupt and erratic market movements and above-average price volatility. It may be difficult to obtain financial information regarding the financial condition of a borrower or issuer, and its financial condition may be changing rapidly. It may be more difficult to value such securities and the spread between the bid and asked prices of such securities may be greater than normally expected.

Dollar Rolls . In a “dollar roll,” the Fund sells securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously agrees to repurchase substantially similar ( i.e. , same type and coupon) securities on a specified future date from the same party. During the period before the repurchase, the Fund forgoes principal and interest payments on the securities. The Fund is compensated by the difference between the current sales price and the forward price for the future purchase (often referred to as the “drop”), as well as by the interest earned on the cash proceeds of the initial sale. Dollar rolls may increase fluctuations in the Fund’s NAV and may be viewed as a form of leverage. A “covered roll” is a specific type of dollar roll in which the Fund holds an offsetting cash position or a cash-equivalent securities position that matures on or before the forward settlement date of the dollar roll transaction. There is a risk that the counterparty will be unable or unwilling to complete the transaction as scheduled, which may result in losses to the Fund. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties to dollar rolls.

Policies and Limitations. Dollar rolls are considered borrowings for purposes of the Fund’s investment policies and limitations concerning borrowings.

Futures Contracts, Options on Futures Contracts, Options on Securities and Indices, Forward Currency Contracts, Options on Foreign Currencies, and Swap Agreements (collectively, “Financial Instruments”)

Financial Instruments are instruments whose value is dependent upon the value of an underlying asset or assets, which may include stocks, bonds, commodities, interest rates, currency exchange rates, or related indices. As described below, Financial Instruments may be used for "hedging" purposes, meaning that they may be used in an effort to offset a decline in value in the Fund’s other investments, which could result from changes in interest rates, market prices, currency fluctuations, or other market factors. Financial Instruments may also be used for non-hedging purposes in an effort to implement a cash management strategy, to enhance income or gain, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the Fund or the risk of individual positions, to gain exposure more efficiently than through a direct purchase of the underlying security, or to gain exposure to securities, markets, sectors or geographical areas.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to establish new regulations with respect to derivatives defined as security-based swaps ( e.g. , derivatives based on an equity) and swaps ( e.g. , derivatives based on a broad-based index or commodity), respectively, and the markets in which these instruments trade. In addition, it subjected all security-based swaps and swaps to SEC and CFTC jurisdiction, respectively.

Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts . The Fund may purchase and sell futures contracts (sometimes referred to as “futures”) and options thereon for hedging purposes ( i.e. , to attempt to hedge against changes in the prices of securities or, in the case of foreign currency futures and options thereon, to attempt to hedge against changes in prevailing currency exchange rates) or non-hedging purposes.

A “purchase” of a futures contract (or entering into a “long” futures position) entails the buyer’s assumption of a contractual obligation to take delivery of the instrument underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time. A “sale” of a futures contract (or entering into a “short” futures position) entails the seller’s assumption of a contractual obligation to make delivery of the instrument underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time.

The value of a futures contract tends to increase or decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will tend to increase the Fund’s exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if the Fund had purchased the underlying instrument directly. The Fund may purchase futures contracts to fix what the Manager believes to be a favorable price for securities the Fund intends to purchase. When the Fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the market for the underlying instrument. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the Fund had sold the underlying instrument. The Fund may sell futures contracts to offset a possible decline in the value of its portfolio securities. In addition, the Fund may purchase or sell futures contracts with a greater or lesser value than the securities it wishes to hedge to attempt to compensate for anticipated differences in volatility between positions the

Fund may wish to hedge and the standardized futures contracts available to it, although this may not be successful in all cases. Further, a loss incurred on a particular transaction being used as a hedge does not mean that it failed to achieve its objective, if the goal was to prevent a worse loss that may have resulted had a particular securities or cash market investment suffered a substantial loss and there were no offsetting hedge.

Certain futures, including index futures and futures not calling for the physical delivery or acquisition of the instrument underlying the contract, are settled on a net cash payment basis rather than by the delivery of the underlying instrument. In addition, although futures contracts by their terms may call for the physical delivery or acquisition of the instrument underlying the contract, in most cases the contractual obligation is extinguished by being offset before the expiration of the contract. A futures position is offset by buying (to offset an earlier sale) or selling (to offset an earlier purchase) an identical futures contract calling for delivery in the same month. This may result in a profit or loss. While futures contracts entered into by the Fund will usually be liquidated in this manner, the Fund may instead make or take delivery of the underlying instrument or utilize the cash settlement process whenever it appears economically advantageous for it to do so.

Because the futures markets may be more liquid than the cash markets, the use of futures contracts permits the Fund to enhance portfolio liquidity and maintain a defensive position without having to sell portfolio securities. For example, (i) futures contracts on single stocks, interest rates and indices (including on narrow-based indices) and options thereon may be used as a maturity or duration management device and/or a device to reduce risk or preserve total return in an adverse environment for the hedged securities, and (ii) foreign currency futures and options thereon may be used as a means of establishing more definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies that are held or intended to be acquired by the Fund.

For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may use futures and options thereon to increase its exposure to the performance of a recognized securities index.

With respect to currency futures, the Fund may sell a currency futures contract or a call option thereon, or may purchase a put option on a currency futures contract, if the Manager anticipates that exchange rates for a particular currency will fall. Such a transaction will be used as a hedge (or, in the case of a sale of a call option, a partial hedge) against a decrease in the value of portfolio securities denominated in that currency. If the Manager anticipates that exchange rates for a particular currency will rise, the Fund may purchase a currency futures contract or a call option thereon to protect against an increase in the price of securities that are denominated in that currency and that the Fund intends to purchase. The Fund also may purchase a currency futures contract or a call option thereon for non-hedging purposes when the Manager anticipates that a particular currency will appreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio.

The Fund may invest in commodity-linked futures contracts either directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary. Commodity-linked futures contracts are generally based upon commodities within six main commodity groups: (1) energy, which includes, among others, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, Brent crude oil, gas oil, natural gas, gasoline and heating oil; (2) livestock, which includes, among others, feeder cattle, live cattle and hogs; (3) agriculture,

which includes, among others, wheat (Kansas City wheat and Chicago wheat), corn and soybeans; (4) industrial metals, which includes, among others, aluminum, copper, lead, nickel and zinc; (5) precious metals, which includes, among others, gold and silver; and (6) softs, which includes cotton, coffee, sugar and cocoa. The price of a commodity futures contract will reflect the storage costs of purchasing the physical commodity. These storage costs include the time value of money invested in the physical commodity plus the actual costs of storing the commodity, less any benefits from ownership of the physical commodity that are not obtained by the holder of a futures contract (these benefits are sometimes referred to as the “convenience yield”). To the extent that these storage costs change for an underlying commodity while the Fund is long futures contracts on that commodity, the value of the futures contract may change proportionately.

“Initial Margin” with respect to a futures contract is the amount of assets that must be deposited by the Fund with, or for the benefit of, a futures commission merchant or broker in order to initiate the Fund’s futures positions. Initial margin is the margin deposit made by the Fund when it enters into a futures contract; it is intended to assure performance of the contract by the Fund. If the value of the Fund’s futures account declines by a specified amount, the Fund will receive a margin call and be required to post assets sufficient to restore the equity in the account to the initial margin level. (This is sometimes referred to as “variation margin;” technically, variation margin refers to daily payments that a clearing member firm is required to pay to the clearing organization based upon marking to market of the firm’s portfolio.) However, if favorable price changes in the futures account cause the margin deposit to exceed the required initial margin level, the excess margin may be transferred to the Fund. The futures commission merchant or clearing member firm through which the Fund enters into and clears futures contracts may require a margin deposit in excess of exchange minimum requirements based upon its assessment of the Fund’s creditworthiness. In computing its net asset value (“NAV”), the Fund will mark to market the value of its open futures positions. The Fund also must make margin deposits with respect to options on futures that it has written (but not with respect to options on futures that it has purchased, if the Fund has paid the required premium in full at the outset). If the futures commission merchant or broker holding the margin deposit or premium goes bankrupt, the Fund could suffer a delay in recovering excess margin or other funds and could ultimately suffer a loss.

Because of the low margin deposits required, futures trading involves an extremely high degree of leverage; as a result, a relatively small price movement in a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss, or gain, to the investor. Losses that may arise from certain futures transactions are potentially unlimited, and may exceed initial margin deposits as well as deposits made in response to subsequent margin calls.

The Fund may enter into futures contracts and options thereon that are traded on exchanges regulated by the CFTC or on non-U.S. exchanges. U.S. futures contracts are traded on exchanges that have been designated as “contract markets” by the CFTC; futures transactions must be executed through a futures commission merchant that is a member of the relevant contract market. Futures executed on regulated futures exchanges have minimal counterparty risk to the Fund because the exchange's clearing organization assumes the position of the counterparty in each transaction. Thus, the Fund is exposed to risk only in connection with the clearing organization and not in connection with the original counterparty to the transaction. However, if a futures customer defaults on a futures contract and the futures commission merchant carrying that customer’s account cannot cover the defaulting customer’s obligations on

its futures contracts, the clearing organization may use any or all of the collateral in the futures commission merchant’s customer omnibus account — including the assets of the futures commission merchant’s other customers, such as the Fund — to meet the defaulting customer’s obligations. This is sometimes referred to as "fellow customer risk." Trading on non-U.S. exchanges is subject to the legal requirements of the jurisdiction in which the exchange is located and to the rules of such exchange, and may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees. Funds deposited in connection with such trading may also be subject to the bankruptcy laws of such other jurisdiction, which may result in a delay in recovering such funds in a bankruptcy and could ultimately result in a loss.

An option on a futures contract gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in the contract (a long position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the option exercise period. The writer of the option is required upon exercise to assume a short futures position (if the option is a call) or a long futures position (if the option is a put). Upon exercise of the option, the accumulated cash balance in the writer’s futures margin account is delivered to the holder of the option. That balance represents the amount by which the market price of the futures contract at exercise exceeds, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option. Options on futures have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein.

Although the Fund believes that the use of futures contracts and options will benefit it, if the Manager’s judgment about the general direction of the markets or about interest rate or currency exchange rate trends is incorrect, the Fund’s overall return would be lower than if it had not entered into any such contracts. The prices of futures contracts and options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in interest or currency exchange rates, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political and economic events. At best, the correlation between changes in prices of futures contracts or options and of securities being hedged can be only approximate due to differences between the futures and securities markets or differences between the securities or currencies underlying the Fund’s futures or options position and the securities held by or to be purchased for the Fund. The currency futures or options market may be dominated by short-term traders seeking to profit from changes in exchange rates. This would reduce the value of such contracts used for hedging purposes over a short-term period. Such distortions are generally minor and would diminish as the contract approaches maturity.

Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may limit the amount of fluctuation in the price of a futures contract or option thereon during a single trading day; once the daily limit has been reached, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. Daily limits govern only price movements during a particular trading day, however; they do not limit potential losses. In fact, a daily limit may increase the risk of loss, because prices can move to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing liquidation of unfavorable futures and options positions and subjecting traders to substantial losses. If this were to happen with respect to a position held by the Fund, it could (depending on the size of the position) have an adverse impact on the Fund’s NAV. In addition, the Fund would continue to be subject to margin calls and might be required to maintain the position being hedged by the futures contract or option thereon or to maintain cash or securities in a segregated account.

Many electronic trading facilities that support futures trading are supported by computer-based component systems for the order, routing, execution, matching, registration or clearing of trades. The Fund’s ability to recover certain losses may be subject to limits on liability imposed by the system provider, the market, the clearing house or member firms.

Call Options on Securities . The Fund may write (sell) covered call options and purchase call options on securities for hedging purposes ( i.e ., to attempt to reduce, at least in part, the effect on the Fund’s NAV of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund) or non-hedging purposes. When writing call options, the Fund writes only “covered” call options on securities it owns. Portfolio securities on which the Fund may write and purchase call options are purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent with the Fund’s investment objective.

When the Fund writes a call option, it is obligated to sell a security to a purchaser at a specified price at any time until a certain date if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund will receive a premium for writing a call option. So long as the obligation of the call option continues, the Fund may be assigned an exercise notice, requiring it to deliver the underlying security against payment of the exercise price. The Fund may be obligated to deliver securities underlying an option at less than the market price.

The writing of covered call options is a conservative investment technique that is believed to involve relatively little risk (in contrast to the writing of “naked” or uncovered call options, which the Fund will not do), but is capable of enhancing the Fund’s total return. When writing a covered call option, the Fund, in return for the premium, gives up the opportunity for profit from a price increase in the underlying security above the exercise price, but retains the risk of loss should the price of the security decline.

If a call option that the Fund has written expires unexercised, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium; however, that gain may be offset by a decline in the market value of the underlying security during the option period. If a call option that the Fund has written is exercised, the Fund will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security.

When the Fund purchases a call option, it pays a premium to the writer for the right to purchase a security from the writer for a specified amount at any time until a certain date. The Fund generally would purchase a call option to offset a previously written call option or to protect itself against an increase in the price of a security it intends to purchase.

Put Options on Securities . The Fund may write (sell) and purchase put options on securities for hedging purposes ( i.e ., to attempt to reduce, at least in part, the effect on the Fund’s NAV of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund) or non-hedging purposes. Portfolio securities on which the Fund may write and purchase put options are purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent with the Fund’s investment objective.

When the Fund writes a put option, it is obligated to acquire a security at a certain price at any time until a certain date if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund will receive a premium for writing a put option. When writing a put option, the Fund, in return for the premium, takes the risk that it must purchase the underlying security at a price that may be higher than the current market price of the security. If a put option that the Fund has written expires unexercised, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium.

When the Fund purchases a put option, it pays a premium to the writer for the right to sell a security to the writer for a specified amount at any time until a certain date. The Fund generally

would purchase a put option to protect itself against a decrease in the market value of a security it owns.

General Information About Options on Securities . The exercise price of an option may be below, equal to, or above the market value of the underlying security at the time the option is written. Options normally have expiration dates between three and nine months from the date written. American-style options are exercisable at any time prior to their expiration date. European-style options are exercisable only immediately prior to their expiration date. The obligation under any option written by the Fund terminates upon expiration of the option or, at an earlier time, when the Fund offsets the option by entering into a “closing purchase transaction” to purchase an option of the same series. If an option is purchased by the Fund and is never exercised or closed out, the Fund will lose the entire amount of the premium paid.

Options are traded both on U.S. national securities exchanges and in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. Options also are traded on non-U.S. exchanges. Exchange-traded options are issued by a clearing organization affiliated with the exchange on which the option is listed; the clearing organization in effect guarantees completion of every exchange-traded option. In contrast, OTC options are contracts between the Fund and a counterparty, with no clearing organization guarantee. Thus, when the Fund sells (or purchases) an OTC option, it generally will be able to “close out” the option prior to its expiration only by entering into a closing transaction with the dealer to whom (or from whom) the Fund originally sold (or purchased) the option. There can be no assurance that the Fund would be able to liquidate an OTC option at any time prior to expiration. Unless the Fund is able to effect a closing purchase transaction in a covered OTC call option it has written, it will not be able to liquidate securities used as cover until the option expires or is exercised or until different cover is substituted. In the event of the counterparty’s insolvency, the Fund may be unable to liquidate its options position and the associated cover. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of dealers with which the Fund may engage in OTC options transactions.

The premium the Fund receives (or pays) when it writes (or purchases) an option is the amount at which the option is currently traded on the applicable market. The premium may reflect, among other things, the current market price of the underlying security, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying security, the length of the option period, the general supply of and demand for credit, and the interest rate environment. The premium the Fund receives when it writes an option is recorded as a liability on the Fund’s statement of assets and liabilities. This liability is adjusted daily to the option’s current market value.

Closing transactions are effected in order to realize a profit (or minimize a loss) on an outstanding option, to prevent an underlying security from being called, or to permit the sale or the put of the underlying security. Furthermore, effecting a closing transaction permits the Fund to write another call option on the underlying security with a different exercise price or expiration date or both. There is, of course, no assurance that the Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at favorable prices. If the Fund cannot enter into such a transaction, it may be required to hold a security that it might otherwise have sold (or purchase a security that it might otherwise not have bought), in which case it would continue to be at market risk on the security.

The Fund will realize a profit or loss from a closing purchase transaction if the cost of the

transaction is less or more than the premium received from writing the call or put option. Because increases in the market price of a call option generally reflect increases in the market price of the underlying security, any loss resulting from the repurchase of a call option is likely to be offset, in whole or in part, by appreciation of the underlying security owned by the Fund; however, the Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if it had not written the call option.

The Fund pays brokerage commissions or spreads in connection with purchasing or writing options, including those used to close out existing positions. From time to time, the Fund may purchase an underlying security for delivery in accordance with an exercise notice of a call option assigned to it, rather than deliver the security from its inventory. In those cases, additional brokerage commissions are incurred.

The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying securities are traded. To the extent that the options markets close before the markets for the underlying securities close, significant price and rate movements can take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets.

Policies and Limitations . The assets used as cover (or segregated) for OTC options written by the Fund will be considered illiquid and thus subject to the Fund’s 15% limitation on illiquid securities, unless the OTC options are sold to qualified dealers who agree that the Fund may repurchase any OTC option it writes at a maximum price to be calculated by a formula set forth in the option agreement. The cover for an OTC call option written subject to this procedure will be considered illiquid only to the extent that the maximum repurchase price under the formula exceeds the intrinsic value of the option.

Put and Call Options on Securities Indices and Other Financial Indices . The Fund may write (sell) and purchase put and call options on securities indices and other financial indices for hedging or non-hedging purposes. In so doing, the Fund can pursue many of the same objectives it would pursue through the purchase and sale of options on individual securities or other instruments.

Options on securities indices and other financial indices are similar to options on a security or other instrument except that, rather than settling by physical delivery of the underlying instrument, options on indices settle by cash settlement; that is, an option on an index gives the holder the right to receive, upon exercise of the option, an amount of cash if the closing level of the index upon which the option is based is greater than, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option (except if, in the case of an OTC option, physical delivery is specified). This amount of cash is equal to the difference between the closing price of the index and the exercise price of the option times a specified multiple (multiplier), which determines the total dollar value for each point of such difference. The seller of the option is obligated, in return for the premium received, to make delivery of this amount.

A securities index fluctuates with changes in the market values of the securities included in the index. The gain or loss on an option on an index depends on price movements in the instruments comprising the market, market segment, industry or other composite on which the underlying index is based, rather than price movements in individual securities, as is the case with respect to options on securities. The risks of investment in options on indices may be greater than the risks of investment in options on securities.

The effectiveness of hedging through the purchase of securities index options will depend upon the extent to which price movements in the securities being hedged correlate with price movements in the selected securities index. Perfect correlation is not possible because the securities held or to be acquired by the Fund will not exactly match the composition of the securities indices on which options are available.

For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may purchase put and call options on securities indices to increase its exposure to the performance of a recognized securities index.

Securities index options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein. Certain securities index options are traded in the OTC market and involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in the case of exchange-traded securities index options.

Options on Foreign Currencies . The Fund may write (sell) and purchase covered call and put options on foreign currencies for hedging or non-hedging purposes. The Fund may use options on foreign currencies to protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by the Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other payments on those securities. In addition, the Fund may write and purchase covered call and put options on foreign currencies for non-hedging purposes ( e.g. , when the Manager anticipates that a foreign currency will appreciate or depreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio). The Fund may write covered call and put options on any currency in order to realize greater income than would be realized on portfolio securities alone.

Currency options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein. Certain options on foreign currencies are traded on the OTC market and involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in the case of exchange-traded currency options.

Forward Foreign Currency Transactions . The Fund may enter into contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract (“forward currency contracts”) for hedging or non-hedging purposes. The Fund also may engage in foreign currency transactions on a spot basis ( i.e., cash transaction that results in actual delivery within two days) at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency market.

The Fund may enter into forward currency contracts in an attempt to hedge against changes in prevailing currency exchange rates ( i.e. , as a means of establishing more definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies). The Fund may also enter into forward currency contracts to protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by the Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other payments on those securities. In addition, the Fund may enter into forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes when the Manager anticipates that a foreign currency will appreciate or depreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio. The cost to the Fund of engaging in forward currency contracts varies with factors such as the currency involved, the length of the contract period, and the market conditions then prevailing.

Sellers or purchasers of forward currency contracts can enter into offsetting closing transactions, similar to closing transactions on futures, by purchasing or selling, respectively, an instrument identical to the instrument sold or bought, respectively. Secondary markets generally do not exist for forward currency contracts, however, with the result that closing transactions generally can be made for forward currency contracts only by negotiating directly with the counterparty. Thus, there can be no assurance that the Fund will in fact be able to close out a forward currency contract at a favorable price prior to maturity. In addition, in the event of insolvency of the counterparty, the Fund might be unable to close out a forward currency contract at any time prior to maturity. In either event, the Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position, and would continue to be required to maintain a position in the securities or currencies that are the subject of the hedge or to maintain cash or securities.

The precise matching of forward currency contract amounts and the value of the securities involved generally will not be possible because the value of such securities, measured in the foreign currency, will change after the forward currency contract has been established. Thus, the Fund might need to purchase or sell foreign currencies in the spot (cash) market to the extent such foreign currencies are not covered by forward currency contracts. The projection of short-term currency market movements is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly uncertain.

The Manager believes that the use of foreign currency hedging techniques, including “proxy-hedges,” can provide significant protection of NAV in the event of a general increase or decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. For example, the return available from securities denominated in a particular foreign currency would decline if the value of the U.S. dollar increased against that currency. Such a decline could be partially or completely offset by an increase in the value of a hedge involving a forward currency contract to sell that foreign currency or a proxy-hedge involving a forward currency contract to sell a different foreign currency whose behavior is expected to resemble the behavior of the currency in which the securities being hedged are denominated but which is available on more advantageous terms.

However, a hedge or a proxy-hedge cannot protect against exchange rate risks perfectly and, if the Manager is incorrect in its judgment of future exchange rate relationships, the Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if such a hedge had not been established. If the Fund uses proxy-hedging, it may experience losses on both the currency in which it has invested and the currency used for hedging if the two currencies do not vary with the expected degree of correlation. Using forward currency contracts to protect the value of the Fund’s securities against a decline in the value of a currency does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of the underlying securities. Because forward currency contracts may not be traded on an exchange, the assets used to cover such contracts may be illiquid. The Fund may experience delays in the settlement of its foreign currency transactions.

Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage include foreign exchange forwards. The consummation of a foreign exchange forward requires the actual exchange of the principal amounts of the two currencies in the contract ( i.e ., settlement on a physical basis). Because foreign exchange forwards are physically settled through an exchange of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A foreign exchange forward generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any stage for trades; foreign exchange dealers

realize a profit based on the difference (the spread) between the prices at which they are buying and the prices at which they are selling various currencies. When the Fund enters into a foreign exchange forward, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction.

The Fund may be required to obtain the currency that it must deliver under the foreign exchange forward through the sale of portfolio securities denominated in such currency or through conversion of other assets of the Fund into such currency. When the Fund engages in foreign currency transactions for hedging purposes, it will not enter into foreign exchange forwards to sell currency or maintain a net exposure to such contracts if their consummation would obligate the Fund to deliver an amount of foreign currency materially in excess of the value of its portfolio securities or other assets denominated in that currency.

Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage also include non-deliverable forwards (“NDFs”). NDFs are cash-settled, short-term forward contracts on foreign currencies (each a “Reference Currency”) that are non-convertible and that may be thinly traded or illiquid. NDFs involve an obligation to pay an amount (the “Settlement Amount”) equal to the difference between the prevailing market exchange rate for the Reference Currency and the agreed upon exchange rate (the “NDF Rate”), with respect to an agreed notional amount. NDFs have a fixing date and a settlement (delivery) date. The fixing date is the date and time at which the difference between the prevailing market exchange rate and the agreed upon exchange rate is calculated. The settlement (delivery) date is the date by which the payment of the Settlement Amount is due to the party receiving payment.

Although NDFs are similar to forward exchange forwards, NDFs do not require physical delivery of the Reference Currency on the settlement date. Rather, on the settlement date, the only transfer between the counterparties is the monetary settlement amount representing the difference between the NDF Rate and the prevailing market exchange rate. NDFs typically may have terms from one month up to two years and are settled in U.S. dollars.

NDFs are subject to many of the risks associated with derivatives in general and forward currency transactions, including risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and the risk that the counterparty will fail to fulfill its obligations. Although NDFs have historically been traded OTC, in the future, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, they may be exchange-traded. Under such circumstances, they will be centrally cleared and a secondary market for them will exist. With respect to NDFs that are centrally-cleared, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with the clearing organization as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if the clearing organization breaches its obligations under the NDF, becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive plus the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the investor. Even if some NDFs remain traded OTC, they will be subject to margin requirements for uncleared swaps and counterparty risk common to other swaps, as discussed below.

The Fund may purchase securities of an issuer domiciled in a country other than the country in whose currency the securities are denominated.

Swap Agreements . The Fund may enter into swap agreements to manage or gain exposure to particular types of investments (including commodities, equity securities or indices of equity securities in which the Fund otherwise could not invest efficiently).

Swap agreements historically have been individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. Swap agreements are two party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors. Swap agreements can vary in term like other fixed-income investments. Most swap agreements are currently traded over-the-counter. In a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange one or more payments based, for example, on the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or instruments (such as securities, indices, or other financial or economic interests). The gross payments to be exchanged (or “swapped”) between the parties are calculated with respect to a notional amount, which is the predetermined dollar principal of the trade representing the hypothetical underlying quantity upon which payment obligations are computed. If a swap agreement provides for payment in different currencies, the parties may agree to exchange the principal amount.

Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of the Fund’s investments and its share price and yield. Swap agreements are subject to liquidity risk, meaning that the Fund may be unable to sell a swap agreement to a third party at a favorable price. Swap agreements may involve leverage and may be highly volatile; depending on how they are used, they may have a considerable impact on the Fund’s performance. The risks of swap agreements depend upon the Fund’s ability to terminate its swap agreements or reduce its exposure through offsetting transactions. Swaps are highly specialized instruments that require investment techniques and risk analyses different from those associated with stocks, bonds, and other traditional investments.

Some swaps currently are, and more in the future will be, centrally cleared. Swaps that are centrally cleared are subject to the creditworthiness of the clearing organization involved in the transaction. For example, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with its futures commission merchant as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if the clearing organization becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive plus the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the investor.

To the extent a swap is not centrally cleared, the use of a swap involves the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty or the failure of the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the agreement. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the swap might decline, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund. Changing conditions in a particular market area, whether or not directly related to the referenced assets that underlie the swap agreement, may have an adverse impact on the creditworthiness of the counterparty. If a default occurs by the counterparty to such a transaction, the Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction.

The swaps market was largely unregulated prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act on July 21, 2010. It is possible that developments in the swaps market, including the issuance of final implementing regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act, could adversely affect the Fund’s ability to enter into swaps in the OTC market (or require that certain of such instruments be exchange-traded and centrally-cleared), or require that the Fund support those trades with collateral, terminate new or existing swap agreements, or realize amounts to be received under such instruments. Regulations that are being developed by the CFTC and banking regulators will require the Fund to post margin on OTC swaps, and clearing organizations and exchanges will set minimum margin requirements for exchange-traded and cleared swaps.

Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names including, but not limited to, interest rate swaps, mortgage swaps, total return swaps, inflation swaps, asset swaps (where parties exchange assets, typically a debt security), currency swaps (where the parties exchange their respective rights to make or receive payments in specified currencies), credit default swaps, and commodity-linked swaps. The Fund may also write (sell) and purchase options on swaps (swaptions).

Interest Rate Swaps, Mortgage Swaps, and Interest Rate “Caps,” “Floors,” and “Collars.” In a typical interest rate swap agreement, one party agrees to make regular payments equal to a floating rate on a specified amount in exchange for payments equal to a fixed rate, or a different floating rate, on the same amount for a specified period. Mortgage swap agreements are similar to interest rate swap agreements, except the notional principal amount is tied to a reference pool of mortgages. In an interest rate cap or floor, one party agrees, usually in return for a fee, to make payments under particular circumstances. For example, the purchaser of an interest rate cap has the right to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate exceeds an agreed level; the purchaser of an interest rate floor has the right to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate falls below an agreed level. An interest rate collar entitles the purchaser to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate falls outside an agreed range.

Among other techniques, the Fund may use interest rate swaps to offset declines in the value of fixed income securities held by the Fund. In such an instance, the Fund may agree with a counterparty to pay a fixed rate (multiplied by a notional amount) and the counterparty to pay a floating rate multiplied by the same notional amount. If long-term interest rates rise, resulting in a diminution in the value of the Fund’s portfolio, the Fund would receive payments under the swap that would offset, in whole or in part, such diminution in value; if interest rates fall, the Fund would likely lose money on the swap transaction. The Fund may also enter into constant maturity swaps, which are a variation of the typical interest rate swap. Constant maturity swaps are exposed to changes in long-term interest rate movements.

Total Return Swaps . The Fund may enter into total return swaps (“TRS”) to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or market. The Fund may be either a total return receiver or a total return payer. Generally, the total return payer sells to the total return receiver an amount equal to all cash flows and price appreciation on a defined security or asset payable at periodic times during the swap term ( i.e ., credit risk) in return for a periodic payment from the total return receiver based on a designated index ( e.g ., the London Interbank Offered Rate, known as LIBOR) and spread, plus the amount of any price depreciation on the reference security or asset. The total return payer does not need

to own the underlying security or asset to enter into a total return swap. The final payment at the end of the swap term includes final settlement of the current market price of the underlying reference security or asset, and payment by the applicable party for any appreciation or depreciation in value. Usually, collateral must be posted by the total return receiver to secure the periodic interest-based and market price depreciation payments depending on the credit quality of the underlying reference security and creditworthiness of the total return receiver, and the collateral amount is marked-to-market daily equal to the market price of the underlying reference security or asset between periodic payment dates.

TRS agreements may be used to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or market. TRS may effectively add leverage to the Fund’s portfolio because, in addition to its net assets, the Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. If the Fund is the total return receiver in a TRS, then the credit risk for an underlying asset is transferred to the Fund in exchange for its receipt of the return (appreciation) on that asset. If the Fund is the total return payer, it is hedging the downside risk of an underlying asset but it is obligated to pay the amount of any appreciation on that asset.

Inflation Swaps. In an inflation swap, one party agrees to pay the cumulative percentage increase in a price index, such as the Consumer Price Index, over the term of the swap (with some lag on the referenced inflation index) and the other party agrees to pay a compounded fixed rate. Inflation swaps may be used to protect the Fund’s NAV against an unexpected change in the rate of inflation measured by an inflation index.

Credit Default Swaps . In a credit default swap, the credit default protection buyer makes periodic payments, known as premiums, to the credit default protection seller. In return, the credit default protection seller will make a payment to the credit default protection buyer upon the occurrence of a specified credit event. A credit default swap can refer to a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets, each known as the reference entity or underlying asset. The Fund may act as either the buyer or the seller of a credit default swap. The Fund may buy or sell credit default protection on a basket of issuers or assets, even if a number of the underlying assets referenced in the basket are lower-quality debt securities. In an unhedged credit default swap, the Fund buys credit default protection on a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets without owning the underlying asset or debt issued by the reference entity. Credit default swaps involve greater and different risks than investing directly in the referenced asset, because, in addition to market risk, credit default swaps include liquidity, counterparty and operational risk.

Credit default swaps allow the Fund to acquire or reduce credit exposure to a particular issuer, asset or basket of assets. If a swap agreement calls for payments by the Fund, the Fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. If the Fund is the credit default protection seller, the Fund will experience a loss if a credit event occurs and the credit of the reference entity or underlying asset has deteriorated. If the Fund is the credit default protection buyer, the Fund will be required to pay premiums to the credit default protection seller. In the case of a physically settled credit default swap in which the Fund is the protection seller, the Fund must be prepared to pay par for and take possession of debt of a defaulted issuer delivered to the Fund by the credit default protection buyer. Any loss would be offset by the premium payments the Fund

receives as the seller of credit default protection.

Commodity-Linked Swaps . Commodity-linked swaps are two party contracts in which the parties agree to exchange the return or interest rate on one instrument for the return of a particular commodity, commodity index or commodity futures or options contract. The payment streams are calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. A one-period swap contract operates in a manner similar to a forward or futures contract because there is an agreement to swap a commodity for cash at only one forward date. The Fund may engage in swap transactions that have more than one period and therefore more than one exchange of payments. The Fund may invest in total return commodity swaps to gain exposure to the overall commodity markets. In a total return commodity swap, the Fund will receive the price appreciation of a commodity index, a portion of the index, or a single commodity in exchange for paying an agreed-upon fee. If the commodity swap is for one period, the Fund will pay a fixed fee, established at the outset of the swap. However, if the term of the commodity swap is more than one period, with interim swap payments, the Fund will pay an adjustable or floating fee. With “floating” rate, the fee is pegged to a base rate such as LIBOR, and is adjusted each period. Therefore, if interest rates increase over the term of the swap contract, the Fund may be required to pay a higher fee at each swap reset date.

Options on Swaps (Swaptions) . A swaption is an option to enter into a swap agreement. The purchaser of a swaption pays a premium for the option and obtains the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an underlying swap on agreed-upon terms. The seller of a swaption, in exchange for the premium, becomes obligated (if the option is exercised) to enter into an underlying swap on agreed-upon terms. Depending on the terms of the particular option agreement, the Fund generally will incur a greater degree of risk when it writes a swaption than when it purchases a swaption. When the Fund purchases a swaption, it risks losing only the amount of the premium it has paid should it decide to let the option expire unexercised.

Policies and Limitations . In accordance with SEC staff requirements, the Fund will segregate cash or appropriate liquid assets in an amount equal to its obligations under security-based swap agreements.

Combined Transactions . The Fund may enter into multiple transactions, which may include multiple options transactions, multiple interest rate transactions and any combination of options and interest rate transactions, instead of a single Financial Instrument, as part of a single or combined strategy when, in the judgment of the Manager, it is in the best interests of the Fund to do so. A combined transaction will usually contain elements of risk that are present in each of its component transactions. Although the Fund will normally enter into combined transactions based on the Manager’s judgment that the combined transactions will reduce risk or otherwise more effectively achieve the desired portfolio management goal, it is possible that the combined transactions will instead increase risk or hinder achievement of the desired portfolio management goal.

Regulatory Limitations on Using Futures, Options on Futures, and Swaps . Historically, advisers to registered investment companies trading commodity interests (such as futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and swaps), including the Fund, have been able to

claim exclusion from regulation as commodity pool operators (“CPOs”) pursuant to CFTC Regulation 4.5. In February 2012, the CFTC adopted substantial amendments to that regulation. To qualify for an exclusion under the amended regulation, the Fund is permitted to engage in unlimited “bona fide hedging” (as defined by the CFTC), but if the Fund uses commodity interests other than for bona fide hedging purposes, the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish these positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 5% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions and excluding the amount by which options that are “in-the-money” at the time of purchase are “in-the-money”) or, alternatively, the aggregate net notional value of non-bona fide hedging commodity interest positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 100% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions). In addition to complying with these de minimis trading limitations, to qualify for an exclusion under the amended regulation, the Fund must satisfy a marketing test, which requires, among other things, that the Fund not hold itself out as a vehicle for trading commodity interests. The CFTC amendments became effective on April 24, 2012, but the compliance date for advisers who had previously claimed the exclusion was deferred until December 31, 2012.

The Fund may be exposed to commodity interests indirectly in excess of the de minimis trading limitations described above. Such exposure may result from the Fund’s investment in other investment vehicles, such as real estate investment trusts, collateralized loan obligations, collateralized debt obligations and other securitization vehicles that may invest directly in commodity interests. These investment vehicles are referred to collectively as “underlying funds.” The CFTC treats a fund as a commodity pool whether it invests in commodity interests directly or indirectly through its investments in underlying funds. The CFTC staff has issued a no-action letter permitting the manager of a fund that invests in such underlying funds to defer registering as a CPO or claiming the exclusion from the CPO definition until six months from the date on which the CFTC issues additional guidance on the application of the calculation of the de minimis trading limitations in the context of the CPO exemption in CFTC Regulation 4.5 (the "Deadline"). Such guidance is expected to clarify how to calculate compliance with the de minimis trading limitations given a fund's investments in investment vehicles that may cause the fund to be deemed to be indirectly trading commodity interests. The Manager has filed the required notice to claim this no-action relief with respect to the Fund. In addition, the Manager has claimed an exclusion (under CFTC Regulation 4.5) from the CPO definition with respect to the Fund. As a result, at this time the Manager is not required to register as a CPO with respect to the Fund and need not generally comply with the regulatory requirements otherwise applicable to a registered CPO. Prior to the Deadline, however, the Manager will determine with respect to the Fund whether it must operate as a registered CPO or whether it can rely on an exemption or exclusion from the CPO definition. If the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, then the Manager, in its management of the Fund, will comply with one of the two alternative de minimis trading limitations in that regulation. Complying with the de minimis trading limitations may restrict the Manager's ability to use derivatives as part of the Fund’s investment strategies. Although the Manager believes that it will be able to execute the Fund’s investment strategies within the de minimis trading limitations, the Fund’s performance could be adversely affected. If the Manager determines that it cannot rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, then the Manager will serve as a registered CPO with respect to the Fund. CPO regulation would

increase the regulatory requirements to which the Fund is subject and it is expected that it would increase costs for the Fund.

Pursuant to authority granted under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Treasury Department issued a notice of final determination stating that foreign exchange forwards, as defined in the Dodd-Frank Act and described above, should not be considered swaps for most purposes. Thus, foreign exchange forwards are not deemed to be commodity interests. Therefore, if the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, the Fund may enter into foreign exchange forwards without such transactions counting against the de minimis trading limitations discussed above.

In addition, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations adopted by the CFTC in connection with implementing the Dodd-Frank Act, NDFs are deemed to be commodity interests, including for purposes of amended CFTC Regulation 4.5. Therefore, if the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, the Fund will limit its investment in NDFs as discussed above.

Cover for Financial Instruments . Transactions using Financial Instruments, other than purchased options, expose the Fund to an obligation to another party. The Fund will not enter into any such transactions unless it owns either (1) an offsetting (“covering”) position in securities, currencies or other options, futures contracts, forward contracts, or swaps, or (2) cash and liquid assets held in a segregated account, or designated on its records as segregated, with a value, marked-to-market daily, sufficient to cover its potential obligations to the extent not covered as provided in (1) above. The Fund will comply with SEC guidelines regarding “cover” for Financial Instruments and, if the guidelines so require, segregate the prescribed amount of cash or appropriate liquid assets.

Assets used as cover or held in a segregated account cannot be sold while the position in the corresponding Financial Instrument is outstanding, unless they are replaced with other suitable assets. As a result, the segregation of a large percentage of the Fund’s assets could impede Fund management or the Fund’s ability to meet redemption requests or other current obligations. The Fund may be unable to promptly dispose of assets that cover, or are segregated with respect to, an illiquid futures, options, forward, or swap position; this inability may result in a loss to the Fund.

General Risks of Financial Instruments . The primary risks in using Financial Instruments are: (1) imperfect correlation or no correlation between changes in market value of the securities or currencies held or to be acquired by the Fund and the prices of Financial Instruments; (2) possible lack of a liquid secondary market for Financial Instruments and the resulting inability to close out Financial Instruments when desired; (3) the fact that the skills needed to use Financial Instruments are different from those needed to select the Fund’s securities; (4) the fact that, although use of Financial Instruments for hedging purposes can reduce the risk of loss, they also can reduce the opportunity for gain, or even result in losses, by offsetting favorable price movements in hedged investments; (5) the possible inability of the Fund to purchase or sell a portfolio security at a time that would otherwise be favorable for it to do so, or the possible need for the Fund to sell a portfolio security at a disadvantageous time, due to its need to maintain cover or to segregate securities in connection with its use of Financial

Instruments; and (6) when traded on non-U.S. exchanges, Financial Instruments may not be regulated as rigorously as in the United States. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s use of Financial Instruments will be successful.

In addition, Financial Instruments may contain leverage to magnify the exposure to the underlying asset or assets.

The Fund’s use of Financial Instruments may be limited by the provisions of the Code, with which it must comply to continue to qualify as a RIC. See “Additional Tax Information.” Financial Instruments may not be available with respect to some currencies, especially those of so-called emerging market countries.

Policies and Limitations . When hedging, the Manager intends to reduce the risk of imperfect correlation by investing only in Financial Instruments whose behavior is expected to resemble or offset that of the Fund’s underlying securities or currency. The Manager intends to reduce the risk that the Fund will be unable to close out Financial Instruments by entering into such transactions only if the Manager believes there will be an active and liquid secondary market.

Fixed Income Securities . Fixed income securities are subject to the risk of an issuer’s inability to meet principal and interest payments on its obligations (“credit risk”) and are subject to price volatility due to such factors as interest rate sensitivity (“interest rate risk”), market perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer, and market liquidity (“market risk”).

Lower-rated securities are more likely to react to developments affecting market and credit risk than are more highly rated securities, which react primarily to movements in the general level of interest rates.

Call Risk. Some debt securities in which the Fund may invest are also subject to the risk that the issuer might repay them early (“call risk”). When market interest rates are low, issuers generally call securities paying higher interest rates. For this reason, the Fund holding a callable security may not enjoy the increase in the security’s market price that usually accompanies a decline in rates. Furthermore, the Fund would have to reinvest the proceeds from the called security at the current, lower rates.

Ratings of Fixed Income Securities. The Fund may purchase securities rated by S&P, Moody’s, Fitch, Inc. or any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”) (please see the Prospectus for further information). The ratings of an NRSRO represent its opinion as to the quality of securities it undertakes to rate. Ratings are not absolute standards of quality; consequently, securities with the same maturity, duration, coupon, and rating may have different yields. In addition, NRSROs are subject to an inherent conflict of interest because they are often compensated by the same issuers whose securities they rate. Although the Fund may rely on the ratings of any NRSRO, the Fund refers mainly to ratings assigned by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch, Inc., which are described in Appendix A. The Fund may also invest in unrated securities that have been determined by the Manager to be comparable in quality to the rated securities in which the Fund may permissibly invest.

High-quality debt securities. High-quality debt securities are securities that have received from at least one NRSRO, such as S&P, Moody’s or Fitch, Inc., a rating in one of the two highest rating categories (the highest category in the case of commercial paper) or, if not rated by any NRSRO, such as U.S. Government and Agency Securities, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality.

Investment Grade Debt Securities. Investment grade debt securities are securities that have received from at least one NRSRO that has rated it, a rating in one of the four highest rating categories or, if not rated by any NRSRO, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality. Moody’s deems securities rated in its fourth highest rating category (Baa) to have speculative characteristics; a change in economic factors could lead to a weakened capacity of the issuer to repay.

Lower-Rated Debt Securities . Lower-rated debt securities or “junk bonds” are those rated below the fourth highest category (including those securities rated as low as D by S&P) or unrated securities of comparable quality. Securities rated below investment grade are often considered to be speculative. See the risks described under “Lower-Rated Debt Securities” in this SAI.

Ratings Downgrades. Subsequent to the Fund’s purchase of debt securities, the rating of that issue of debt securities may be reduced, so that the securities would no longer be eligible for purchase by the Fund.

Duration and Maturity. Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of debt securities to changes in market interest rates, based on the entire cash flow associated with the securities, including payments occurring before the final repayment of principal.

The Manager may utilize duration as a tool in portfolio selection instead of the more traditional measure known as “term to maturity.” “Term to maturity” measures only the time until a debt security provides its final payment, taking no account of the pattern of the security’s payments prior to maturity. Duration incorporates a bond’s yield, coupon interest payments, final maturity and call features into one measure. Duration therefore provides a more accurate measurement of a bond’s likely price change in response to a given change in market interest rates. The longer the duration, the greater the bond’s price movement will be as interest rates change. For any fixed income security with interest payments occurring prior to the payment of principal, duration is always less than maturity.

Futures, options and options on futures have durations which are generally related to the duration of the securities underlying them. Holding long futures or call option positions will lengthen the Fund’s duration by approximately the same amount as would holding an equivalent amount of the underlying securities. Short futures or put options have durations roughly equal to the negative of the duration of the securities that underlie these positions, and have the effect of reducing portfolio duration by approximately the same amount as would selling an equivalent amount of the underlying securities.

There are some situations where even the standard duration calculation does not properly reflect the interest rate exposure of a security. For example, floating and variable rate securities

often have final maturities of ten or more years; however, their interest rate exposure corresponds to the frequency of the coupon reset. Another example where the interest rate exposure is not properly captured by duration is the case of mortgage-backed securities. The stated final maturity of such securities is generally 30 years, but current and expected prepayment rates are critical in determining the securities’ interest rate exposure. In these and other similar situations, the Manager where permitted, will use more sophisticated analytical techniques that incorporate the economic life of a security into the determination of its interest rate exposure.

The Fund may invest in securities of any maturity and does not have a target average duration.

Policies and Limitations . There are no restrictions as to the amount of the Fund’s assets that may be invested in fixed income securities or the ratings of such securities the Fund may acquire or the portion of its assets it may invest in debt securities in a particular ratings category.

Foreign Securities . The Fund may invest in U.S. dollar-denominated securities of foreign issuers foreign branches of U.S. banks, including negotiable certificates of deposit (“CDs”), bankers’ acceptances, and commercial paper. Foreign issuers are issuers organized and doing business principally outside the United States and include banks, non-U.S. governments, and quasi-governmental organizations. Investments in foreign securities involve sovereign and other risks, in addition to the credit and market risks normally associated with domestic securities. These risks include the possibility of adverse political and economic developments (including political or social instability, nationalization, expropriation, or confiscatory taxation); the potentially adverse effects of the unavailability of public information regarding issuers, less governmental supervision and regulation of financial markets, reduced liquidity of certain financial markets, and the lack of uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting standards or the application of standards that are different or less stringent than those applied in the United States; different laws and customs governing securities tracking; and possibly limited access to the courts to enforce the Fund’s rights as an investor. It may be difficult to invoke legal process or to enforce contractual obligations abroad, and it may be especially difficult to sue a foreign government in the courts of that country.

The Fund also may invest in equity, debt, or other securities that are denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, including (1) common and preferred stocks, (2) CDs, commercial paper, fixed time deposits, and bankers’ acceptances issued by foreign banks, (3) obligations of other corporations, and (4) obligations of foreign governments and their subdivisions, agencies, and instrumentalities, international agencies, and supranational entities. Investing in foreign currency denominated securities involves the special risks associated with investing in non-U.S. issuers, as described in the preceding paragraph, and the additional risks of (a) adverse changes in foreign exchange rates, (b) nationalization, expropriation, or confiscatory taxation, and (c) adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations (which could prevent cash from being brought back to the United States). Additionally, dividends and interest payable on foreign securities (and gains realized on disposition thereof) may be subject to foreign taxes, including taxes withheld from those payments. Commissions on foreign securities exchanges are often at fixed rates and are generally higher than negotiated commissions on U.S. exchanges, although the Fund endeavors to achieve the most favorable net results on portfolio transactions.

Foreign securities often trade with less frequency and in less volume than domestic securities and therefore may exhibit greater price volatility. Additional costs associated with an investment in foreign securities may include higher custodial fees than apply to domestic custody arrangements and transaction costs of foreign currency conversions.

Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures. In certain markets, there have been times when settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when a portion of the assets of the Fund are uninvested and no return is earned thereon. The inability of the Fund to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to miss attractive investment opportunities. Inability to dispose of portfolio securities due to settlement problems could result in losses to the Fund due to subsequent declines in value of the securities or, if the Fund has entered into a contract to sell the securities, could result in possible liability to the purchaser. The inability of the Fund to settle security purchases or sales due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to pay additional expenses, such as interest charges.

Interest rates prevailing in other countries may affect the prices of foreign securities and exchange rates for foreign currencies. Local factors, including the strength of the local economy, the demand for borrowing, the government’s fiscal and monetary policies, and the international balance of payments, often affect interest rates in other countries. Individual foreign economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, and balance of payments position.

The Fund may invest in American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), European Depository Receipts (“EDRs”), Global Depository Receipts (“GDRs”) and International Depository Receipts (“IDRs”). ADRs (sponsored or unsponsored) are receipts typically issued by a U.S. bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. Most ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and are traded on a U.S. stock exchange. However, they are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate if, as is often the case, the underlying securities are denominated in foreign currency. EDRs and IDRs are receipts typically issued by a European bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. GDRs are receipts issued by either a U.S. or non-U.S. banking institution evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities and are often denominated in U.S. dollars. EDRs, IDRs and GDRs involve many of the same risks of investing directly in foreign securities, including currency risks and risks of foreign investing.

Issuers of the securities underlying sponsored depositary receipts, but not unsponsored depositary receipts, are contractually obligated to disclose material information in the United States. Therefore, the market value of unsponsored depositary receipts is less likely to reflect the effect of such information.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund is not restricted in the amount it may invest in foreign securities including foreign securities denominated in any one foreign currency.

Securities of Issuers in Emerging Market Countries. The risks described above for foreign securities may be heightened in connection with investments in emerging market countries.

Historically, the markets of emerging market countries have been more volatile than the markets of developed countries, reflecting the greater uncertainties of investing in less established markets and economies. In particular, emerging market countries may have less stable governments; may present the risks of nationalization of businesses, restrictions on foreign ownership and prohibitions on the repatriation of assets; and may have less protection of property rights than more developed countries. The economies of emerging market countries may be reliant on only a few industries, may be highly vulnerable to changes in local or global trade conditions and may suffer from high and volatile debt burdens or inflation rates. Local securities markets may trade a small number of securities and may be unable to respond effectively to increases in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of holdings difficult or impossible at times.

In determining where an issuer of a security is based, the Manager may consider such factors as where the company is legally organized, maintains its principal corporate offices and/or conducts its principal operations.

Additional costs could be incurred in connection with the Fund’s investment activities outside the United States. Brokerage commissions may be higher outside the United States, and the Fund will bear certain expenses in connection with its currency transactions. Furthermore, increased custodian costs may be associated with maintaining assets in certain jurisdictions.

Certain risk factors related to emerging market countries include:

Currency fluctuations . The Fund’s investments may be valued in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Certain emerging market countries’ currencies have experienced and may in the future experience significant declines against the U.S. dollar. For example, if the U.S. dollar appreciates against foreign currencies, the value of the Fund’s securities holdings would generally depreciate and vice versa. Consistent with its investment objective, the Fund can engage in certain currency transactions to hedge against currency fluctuations. See “Foreign Currency Transactions” below.

Government regulation . The political, economic and social structures of certain developing countries may be more volatile and less developed than those in the United States. Certain emerging market countries lack uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, have less governmental supervision of financial markets than in the United States, and do not honor legal rights enjoyed in the United States. Certain governments may be more unstable and present greater risks of nationalization or restrictions on foreign ownership of local companies.

Repatriation of investment income, capital and the proceeds of sales by foreign investors may require governmental registration and/or approval in some emerging market countries. While the Fund will only invest in markets where these restrictions are considered acceptable by the Manager, a country could impose new or additional repatriation restrictions after the Fund’s investment. If this happened, the Fund’s response might include, among other things, applying to the appropriate authorities for a waiver of the restrictions or engaging in transactions in other markets designed to offset the risks of decline in that country. Such restrictions will be considered in relation to the Fund’s liquidity needs and all other positive and negative factors.

Further, some attractive equity securities may not be available to the Fund, or the Fund may have to pay a premium to purchase those equity securities, due to foreign shareholders already holding the maximum amount legally permissible.

While government involvement in the private sector varies in degree among emerging market countries, such involvement may in some cases include government ownership of companies in certain sectors, wage and price controls or imposition of trade barriers and other protectionist measures. With respect to any emerging market country, there is no guarantee that some future economic or political crisis will not lead to price controls, forced mergers of companies, expropriation, or creation of government monopolies to the possible detriment of the Fund’s investments.

Less developed securities markets . Emerging market countries may have less well developed securities markets and exchanges. These markets have lower trading volumes than the securities markets of more developed countries. These markets may be unable to respond effectively to increases in trading volume. Consequently, these markets may be substantially less liquid than those of more developed countries, and the securities of issuers located in these markets may have limited marketability. These factors may make prompt liquidation of substantial portfolio holdings difficult or impossible at times.

Settlement risks . Settlement systems in emerging market countries are generally less well organized than developed markets. Supervisory authorities may also be unable to apply standards comparable to those in developed markets. Thus, there may be risks that settlement may be delayed and that cash or securities belonging to the Fund may be in jeopardy because of failures of or defects in the systems. In particular, market practice may require that payment be made before receipt of the security being purchased or that delivery of a security be made before payment is received. In such cases, default by a broker or bank (the “counterparty”) through whom the transaction is effected might cause the Fund to suffer a loss. The Fund will seek, where possible, to use counterparties whose financial status is such that this risk is reduced. However, there can be no certainty that the Fund will be successful in eliminating this risk, particularly as counterparties operating in emerging market countries frequently lack the substance or financial resources of those in developed countries. There may also be a danger that, because of uncertainties in the operation of settlement systems in individual markets, competing claims may arise with respect to securities held by or to be transferred to the Fund.

Investor information . The Fund may encounter problems assessing investment opportunities in certain emerging market securities markets in light of limitations on available information and different accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards. In such circumstances, the Manager will seek alternative sources of information, and to the extent it may not be satisfied with the sufficiency of the information obtained with respect to a particular market or security, the Fund will not invest in such market or security.

Taxation . Taxation of dividends received and net capital gains realized by non-residents varies among emerging market countries and, in some cases, is comparatively high. In addition, emerging market countries typically have less well-defined tax laws and procedures, and such laws may permit retroactive taxation so that the Fund could in the future become subject to local

tax liability that it had not reasonably anticipated in conducting its investment activities or valuing its assets.

Litigation. The Fund and its shareholders may encounter substantial difficulties in obtaining and enforcing judgments against non-U.S. resident individuals and companies.

Fraudulent securities . Securities purchased by the Fund may subsequently be found to be fraudulent or counterfeit, resulting in a loss to the Fund.

Risks of Investing in Frontier Emerging Market Countries. Frontier emerging market countries are countries that have smaller economies or less developed capital markets than traditional emerging markets. Frontier emerging market countries tend to have relatively low gross national product per capita compared to the larger traditionally-recognized emerging markets. The frontier emerging market countries include the least developed countries even by emerging markets standards. The risks of investments in frontier emerging market countries include all the risks described above for investment in foreign securities and emerging markets, although these risks are magnified in the case of frontier emerging market countries.

Health Sector Risks. Health care companies can be adversely affected by, among other things, extensive government regulation, restrictions on government reimbursement for medical expenses, rising or falling costs of medical products and services, pricing pressure, an increased emphasis on outpatient services, limited number of products, industry innovation, changes in technologies and other market developments. They are also sensitive to political trends, actual and perceived, that may presage legislative or regulatory changes. Moreover, liability for products that are later alleged to be harmful or unsafe may be substantial, and may have a significant impact on the health care company’s market value and/or share price.

Biotechnology and related companies can be adversely affected by, among other things, patent considerations, intense competition, rapid technology change and obsolescence, and regulatory requirements of various federal and state agencies. In addition, some of these companies are relatively small and may have thinly traded securities, may not yet offer products or may offer a single product, and may have persistent losses during a new product’s transition from development to production, or erratic revenue patterns. . Health care companies are subject to competitive forces that may make it difficult to raise prices and, in fact, may result in price discounting. The stock prices of these companies may be very volatile, particularly when their products are up for regulatory approval and/or under regulatory scrutiny.

The impact of recent legislation passed by the U.S. government and other legislation introduced or considered by other governments on any individual health care company or on the health care sector as a whole cannot be predicted. These laws and proposals span a wide range of topics, including cost control, national health insurance, incentives for compensation in the provision of health care services, tax incentives and penalties related to health care insurance premiums, and promotion of prepaid health care plans.

Illiquid Securities . Generally, an illiquid security is a security that cannot be expected to be sold or disposed of within seven days at approximately the price at which it is valued by the Fund. Illiquid securities may include unregistered or other restricted securities and repurchase

agreements maturing in greater than seven days. Illiquid securities may also include commercial paper under section 4(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 144A securities (restricted securities that may be traded freely among qualified institutional buyers pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the securities laws); these securities are considered illiquid unless the Manager, acting pursuant to guidelines established by the Fund Trustees, determines they are liquid. Most such securities held by the Fund are deemed liquid. Generally, foreign securities freely tradable in their principal market are not considered restricted or illiquid, even if they are not registered in the United States. Illiquid securities may be difficult for the Fund to value or dispose of due to the absence of an active trading market. The sale of some illiquid securities by the Fund may be subject to legal restrictions, which could be costly to the Fund.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund may not purchase any security if, as a result, more than 15% of its net assets would be invested in illiquid securities.

Indexed Securities . The Fund may invest in indexed securities whose values are linked to currencies, interest rates, commodities, indices, or other financial indicators, domestic or foreign. Most indexed securities are short- to intermediate-term fixed income securities whose values at maturity or interest rates rise or fall according to the change in one or more specified underlying instruments. The value of indexed securities may increase or decrease if the underlying instrument appreciates, and they may have return characteristics similar to direct investment in the underlying instrument. An indexed security may be more volatile than the underlying instrument itself.

Inflation-Indexed Securities . The Fund may invest in U.S. Treasury securities the principal value of which is adjusted daily in accordance with changes to the Consumer Price Index. Such securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Interest is calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. The principal value of inflation-indexed securities declines in periods of deflation, but holders at maturity receive no less than par. If inflation is lower than expected during the period the Fund holds the security, the Fund may earn less on it than on a conventional bond.

Because the coupon rate on inflation-indexed securities is lower than fixed-rate U.S. Treasury securities, the Consumer Price Index would have to rise at least to the amount of the difference between the coupon rate of the fixed-rate U.S. Treasury issues and the coupon rate of the inflation-indexed securities, assuming all other factors are equal, in order for such securities to match the performance of the fixed-rate U.S. Treasury securities. Inflation-indexed securities are expected to react primarily to changes in the “real” interest rate ( i.e. , the nominal (or stated) rate less the rate of inflation), while a typical bond reacts to changes in the nominal interest rate. Accordingly, inflation-indexed securities have characteristics of fixed-rate U.S. Treasury securities having a shorter duration. Changes in market interest rates from causes other than inflation will likely affect the market prices of inflation-indexed securities in the same manner as conventional bonds.

Any increase in the principal value of an inflation-indexed security is taxable in the year the increase occurs, even though its holders do not receive cash representing the increase until the security matures. Because the Fund must distribute substantially all of its net income (including non-cash income attributable to those principal value increases) to its shareholders

each taxable year to avoid payment of federal income and excise taxes, the Fund may have to dispose of other investments under disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash, or may be required to borrow, to satisfy its distribution requirements.

Investments by Funds of Funds or Other Large Shareholders . The Fund may experience large redemptions or investments due to transactions in Fund shares by funds of funds, other large shareholders, or similarly managed accounts. While it is impossible to predict the overall effect of these transactions over time, there could be an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance. In the event of such redemptions or investments, the Fund could be required to sell securities or to invest cash at a time when it may not otherwise desire to do so. Such transactions may increase the Fund’s brokerage and/or other transaction costs and affect the liquidity of the Fund’s portfolio. In addition, when funds of funds or other investors own a substantial portion of the Fund’s shares, a large redemption by such an investor could cause actual expenses to increase, or could result in the Fund’s current expenses being allocated over a smaller asset base, leading to an increase in the Fund’s expense ratio. Redemptions of Fund shares could also accelerate the realization of taxable capital gains in the Fund if sales of securities result in capital gains. The impact of these transactions is likely to be greater when a fund of funds or other significant investor purchases, redeems, or owns a substantial portion of the Fund’s shares. A high volume of redemption requests can impact the Fund the same way as the transactions of a single shareholder with substantial investments.

Leverage . The Fund may engage in transactions that have the effect of leverage. Although leverage creates an opportunity for increased total return, it also can create special risk considerations. For example, leverage from borrowing may amplify changes in the Fund’s NAV. Although the principal of such borrowings will be fixed, the Fund’s assets may change in value during the time the borrowing is outstanding. Leverage from borrowing creates interest expenses for the Fund. To the extent the income derived from securities purchased with borrowed funds is sufficient to cover the cost of leveraging, the net income of the Fund will be greater than it would be if leverage were not used. Conversely, to the extent the income derived from securities purchased with borrowed funds is not sufficient to cover the cost of leveraging, the net income of the Fund will be less than it would be if leverage were not used and, therefore, the amount (if any) available for distribution to the Fund’s shareholders as dividends will be reduced. Reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, when issued and delayed-delivery transactions, certain Financial Instruments (as defined above), and short sales, among others, may create leverage.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund may make investments while borrowings are outstanding. The Fund may borrow money for investment purposes, however, in general, the Fund does not intend to do so. The Fund also may use leverage to purchase securities needed to close out short sales or to obtain the collateral needed to borrow a security in order to effect a short sale of that security. The Fund may engage in transactions that have the effect of leverage for investment purposes and hedging.

Lower-Rated Debt Securities . Lower-rated debt securities or “junk bonds” are those rated below the fourth highest category (including those securities rated as low as D by S&P) or unrated securities of comparable quality. Securities rated below investment grade are often considered to be speculative. These securities have poor protection with respect to the issuer's capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Lower-rated debt securities generally offer a higher

current yield than that available for investment grade issues with similar maturities, but they may involve significant risk under adverse conditions. In particular, adverse changes in general economic conditions and in the industries in which the issuers are engaged and changes in the financial condition of the issuers are more likely to cause price volatility and weaken the capacity of the issuer to make principal and interest payments than is the case for higher-grade debt securities. These securities are susceptible to default or decline in market value due to real or perceived adverse economic and business developments relating to the issuer, market interest rates and market liquidity. In addition, to the extent the Fund invests in lower-quality securities, it may incur additional expenses to the extent recovery is sought on defaulted securities. Because of the many risks involved in investing in lower-rated debt securities, the success of such investments is dependent on the credit analysis of a Manager.

During periods of economic downturn or rising interest rates, highly leveraged issuers may experience financial stress which could adversely affect their ability to make payments of interest and principal and increase the possibility of default. In addition, such issuers may not have more traditional methods of financing available to them and may be unable to repay debt at maturity by refinancing. The risk of loss due to default by such issuers is significantly greater because such securities frequently are unsecured and subordinated to the prior payment of senior indebtedness.

At certain times in the past, the market for lower-rated debt securities has expanded rapidly, and its growth generally paralleled a long economic expansion. In the past, the prices of many lower-rated debt securities declined substantially, reflecting an expectation that many issuers of such securities might experience financial difficulties. As a result, the yields on lower-rated debt securities rose dramatically. However, such higher yields did not reflect the value of the income stream that holders of such securities expected, but rather the risk that holders of such securities could lose a substantial portion of their value as a result of the issuers’ financial restructuring or defaults. There can be no assurance that such declines will not recur.

The market for lower-rated debt issues generally is thinner or less active than that for higher quality securities, which may limit the Fund’s ability to sell such securities at fair value in response to changes in the economy or financial markets. Judgment may play a greater role in pricing such securities than it does for more liquid securities. Adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may also decrease the values and liquidity of lower rated debt securities, especially in a thinly traded market.

The Fund may invest in securities whose ratings imply an imminent risk of default with respect to such payments. Issuers of securities in default may fail to resume principal or interest payments, in which case the Fund may lose its entire investment.

See Appendix A for further information about the ratings of debt securities assigned by S&P, Fitch, Inc., and Moody’s.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund has no limitations on the amount of its assets that it can invest in lower-rated debt securities.

The Fund considers bonds rated by at least one NRSRO below the fourth highest rating category to be lower-rated debt securities or “junk bonds.”

Master Limited Partnerships . Master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) are limited partnerships (or similar entities) in which the ownership units ( e.g. , limited partnership interests) are publicly traded. MLP units are registered with the SEC and are freely traded on a securities exchange or in the OTC market. Many MLPs operate in oil and gas related businesses, including energy processing and distribution. Many MLPs are pass-through entities that generally are taxed at the unitholder level and are not subject to federal or state income tax at the entity level. Annual income, gains, losses, deductions and credits of an MLP pass through directly to its unitholders. Distributions from an MLP may consist in part of a return of capital. Generally, an MLP is operated under the supervision of one or more general partners. Limited partners are not involved in the day-to-day management of an MLP.

Investing in MLPs involves certain risks related to investing in their underlying assets and risks associated with pooled investment vehicles. MLPs holding credit-related investments are subject to interest rate risk and the risk of default on payment obligations by debt issuers. MLPs that concentrate in a particular industry or a particular geographic region are subject to risks associated with such industry or region. Investments held by MLPs may be relatively illiquid, limiting the MLPs’ ability to vary their portfolios promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. MLPs may have limited financial resources, their securities may trade infrequently and in limited volume, and they may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than securities of larger or more broadly based companies.

The risks of investing in an MLP are generally those inherent in investing in a partnership as opposed to a corporation. For example, state law governing partnerships is often less restrictive than state law governing corporations. Accordingly, there may be fewer protections afforded investors in an MLP than investors in a corporation. Although unitholders of an MLP are generally limited in their liability, similar to a corporation’s shareholders, creditors typically have the right to seek the return of distributions made to unitholders if the liability in question arose before the distributions were paid. This liability may stay attached to a unitholder even after it sells its units.

Mortgage-Backed Securities . Mortgage-backed securities represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of mortgage loans. Those securities may be guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or instrumentality (such as Ginnie Mae); issued and guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation, though not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (such as by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (collectively, the “GSEs”), and described in greater detail below); or issued by fully private issuers. Private issuers are generally originators of and investors in mortgage loans and include savings associations, mortgage bankers, commercial banks, investment bankers, and special purpose entities. Private mortgage-backed securities may be backed by U.S. Government agency supported mortgage loans or some form of non-governmental credit enhancement.

Government-related guarantors ( i.e. , not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government) include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored corporation owned by stockholders. It is subject to general regulation by the Federal Housing

Finance Authority (“FHFA”). Fannie Mae purchases residential mortgages from a list of approved seller/servicers that include state and federally chartered savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, commercial banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers. Fannie Mae guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on pass-through securities that it issues, but those securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Freddie Mac is a government-sponsored corporation formerly owned by the twelve Federal Home Loan Banks and now owned by stockholders. Freddie Mac issues Participation Certificates (“PCs”), which represent interests in mortgages from Freddie Mac’s national portfolio. Freddie Mac guarantees the timely payment of interest and ultimate collection of principal on the PCs it issues, but those PCs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

The U.S. Treasury has historically had the authority to purchase obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. However, in 2008, due to capitalization concerns, Congress provided the U.S. Treasury with additional authority to lend the GSEs emergency funds and to purchase their stock. In September 2008, those capital concerns led the U.S. Treasury and the FHFA to announce that the GSEs had been placed in conservatorship.

Since that time, the GSEs have received significant capital support through U.S. Treasury preferred stock purchases as well as U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve purchases of their mortgage backed securities (“MBS”). While the MBS purchase programs ended in 2010, the U.S. Treasury announced in December 2009 that it would continue its support for the entities’ capital as necessary to prevent a negative net worth through at least 2012. From the end of 2007 through the third quarter of 2012, the GSEs required U.S. Treasury support of approximately $187.5 billion through draws under the preferred stock purchase agreements. However, they have repaid approximately $46 billion in dividends. Both GSEs ended the third quarter of 2012 with positive net worth and, as a result, neither required a draw from the U.S. Treasury. While the U.S. Treasury is committed to offset negative equity at the GSEs through its preferred stock purchases through 2012, FHFA has made projections for those purchases through 2015, predicting that cumulative U.S. Treasury draws (including dividends) at the end of 2015 could range from $191 billion to $209 billion. Nonetheless, no assurance can be given that the Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury, or FHFA initiatives will ensure that the GSEs will remain successful in meeting their obligations with respect to the debt and MBS they issue beyond that date.

In addition, the future of the GSEs is in serious question as the U.S. Government reportedly is considering multiple options, ranging on a spectrum from nationalization, privatization, consolidation, or abolishment of the entities. The problems faced by the GSEs that resulted in their being placed into federal conservatorship and receiving significant U.S. Government support have sparked serious debate among federal policy makers regarding the continued role of the U.S. Government in providing liquidity for mortgage loans. The Obama Administration produced a report to Congress on February 11, 2011, outlining a proposal to wind down the GSEs by increasing their guarantee fees, reducing their conforming loan limits (the maximum amount of each loan they are authorized to purchase), and continuing progressive limits on the size of their investment portfolio. Congress is currently considering several pieces of legislation that would reform the GSEs and possibly wind down their existence, addressing

portfolio limits and guarantee fees, among other issues.

The FHFA and the U.S. Treasury (through its agreement to purchase GSE preferred stock) have imposed strict limits on the size of GSEs’ mortgage portfolios. In August 2012, the U.S. Treasury amended its preferred stock purchase agreements to provide that the GSEs’ portfolios will be wound down at an annual rate of 15 percent (up from the previously agreed annual rate of 10 percent), requiring the GSEs to reach the $250 billion target four years earlier than previously planned.

Mortgage-backed securities may have either fixed or adjustable interest rates. Tax or regulatory changes may adversely affect the mortgage securities market. In addition, changes in the market’s perception of the issuer may affect the value of mortgage-backed securities. The rate of return on mortgage-backed securities may be affected by prepayments of principal on the underlying loans, which generally increase as market interest rates decline; as a result, when interest rates decline, holders of these securities normally do not benefit from appreciation in market value to the same extent as holders of other non-callable debt securities.

Because many mortgages are repaid early, the actual maturity and duration of mortgage-backed securities are typically shorter than their stated final maturity and their duration calculated solely on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule. In calculating its dollar-weighted average maturity and duration, the Fund may apply certain industry conventions regarding the maturity and duration of mortgage-backed instruments. Different analysts use different models and assumptions in making these determinations. The Fund uses an approach that the Manager believes is reasonable in light of all relevant circumstances. If this determination is not borne out in practice, it could positively or negatively affect the value of the Fund when market interest rates change. Increasing market interest rates generally extend the effective maturities of mortgage-backed securities, increasing their sensitivity to interest rate changes.

Mortgage-backed securities may be issued in the form of collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) or collateralized mortgage-backed bonds (“CBOs”). CMOs are obligations that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages; payments of principal and interest on the mortgages are passed through to the holders of the CMOs, although not necessarily on a pro rata basis, on the same schedule as they are received. CBOs are general obligations of the issuer that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages. The mortgages serve as collateral for the issuer’s payment obligations on the bonds, but interest and principal payments on the mortgages are not passed through either directly (as with mortgage-backed “pass-through” securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities) or on a modified basis (as with CMOs). Accordingly, a change in the rate of prepayments on the pool of mortgages could change the effective maturity or the duration of a CMO but not that of a CBO (although, like many bonds, CBOs may be callable by the issuer prior to maturity). To the extent that rising interest rates cause prepayments to occur at a slower than expected rate, a CMO could be converted into a longer-term security that is subject to greater risk of price volatility.

Governmental, government-related, and private entities (such as commercial banks, savings institutions, private mortgage insurance companies, mortgage bankers, and other

secondary market issuers, including securities broker-dealers and special purpose entities that generally are affiliates of the foregoing established to issue such securities) may create mortgage loan pools to back CMOs and CBOs. Such issuers may be the originators and/or servicers of the underlying mortgage loans, as well as the guarantors of the mortgage-backed securities. Pools created by non-governmental issuers generally offer a higher rate of interest than governmental and government-related pools because of the absence of direct or indirect government or agency guarantees. Various forms of insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool, and hazard insurance and letters of credit, may support timely payment of interest and principal of non-governmental pools. Governmental entities, private insurers, and mortgage poolers issue these forms of insurance and guarantees. The Manager considers such insurance and guarantees, as well as the creditworthiness of the issuers thereof, in determining whether a mortgage-backed security meets the Fund’s investment quality standards. There can be no assurance that private insurers or guarantors can meet their obligations under insurance policies or guarantee arrangements. The Fund may buy mortgage-backed securities without insurance or guarantees, if the Manager determines that the securities meet the Fund’s quality standards. The Manager will, consistent with the Fund’s investment objectives, policies and limitations and quality standards, consider making investments in new types of mortgage-backed securities as such securities are developed and offered to investors.

Policies and Limitations. The Fund may not purchase mortgage-backed securities that, in the Manager’s opinion, are illiquid if, as a result, more than 15% of the Fund’s net assets would be invested in illiquid securities.

Freddie Mac Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. Freddie Mac CMOs are debt obligations of Freddie Mac issued in multiple tranches having different maturity dates that are secured by the pledge of a pool of conventional mortgage loans purchased by Freddie Mac. Unlike Freddie Mac PCs, payments of principal and interest on the CMOs are made semiannually, as opposed to monthly. The amount of principal payable on each semiannual payment date is determined in accordance with Freddie Mac’s mandatory sinking fund schedule, which, in turn, is equal to approximately 100% of FHA prepayment experience applied to the mortgage collateral pool. All sinking fund payments in the CMOs are allocated to the retirement of the individual tranches of bonds in the order of their stated maturities. Payment of principal on the mortgage loans in the collateral pool in excess of the amount of Freddie Mac’s minimum sinking fund obligation for any payment date are paid to the holders of the CMOs as additional sinking fund payments. This “pass-through” of prepayments has the effect of retiring most CMO tranches prior to their stated final maturity.

If collection of principal (including prepayments) on the mortgage loans during any semiannual payment period is not sufficient to meet Freddie Mac’s minimum sinking fund obligation on the next sinking fund payment date, Freddie Mac agrees to make up the deficiency from its general funds.

Criteria for the mortgage loans in the pool backing the Freddie Mac CMOs are identical to those of Freddie Mac PCs. Freddie Mac has the right to substitute collateral in the event of delinquencies and/or defaults.

Other Mortgage-Related Securities. Other mortgage-related securities include securities other than those described above that directly or indirectly represent a participation in, or are secured by and payable from, mortgage loans on real property, including stripped mortgage-backed securities. Other mortgage-related securities may be equity or debt securities issued by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. Government or by private originators of, or investors in, mortgage loans, including savings and loan associations, homebuilders, mortgage banks, commercial banks, investment banks, partnerships, trusts and special purpose entities of the foregoing.

Natural Disasters and Adverse Weather Conditions. Certain areas of the world historically have been prone to major natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, flooding, tidal waves, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, wildfires or droughts, and have been economically sensitive to environmental events. Such disasters, and the resulting damage, could have a severe and negative impact on the Fund’s investment portfolio and, in the longer term, could impair the ability of issuers in which the Fund invests to conduct their businesses in the manner normally conducted. Adverse weather conditions may also have a particularly significant negative effect on issuers in the agricultural sector and on insurance companies that insure against the impact of natural disasters.

Preferred Stock . The Fund may invest in preferred stock. Unlike interest payments on debt securities, dividends on preferred stock are generally payable at the discretion of the issuer’s board of directors. Preferred shareholders may have certain rights if dividends are not paid but generally have no legal recourse against the issuer. Shareholders may suffer a loss of value if dividends are not paid. The market prices of preferred stocks are generally more sensitive to changes in the issuer’s creditworthiness than are the prices of debt securities.

Real Estate-Related Instruments . Real estate-related instruments include securities of real estate investment trusts (also known as “REITs”), commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities and real estate financings. Such instruments are sensitive to factors such as real estate values and property taxes, interest rates, cash flow of underlying real estate assets, overbuilding, and the management skill and creditworthiness of the issuer. Real estate-related instruments may also be affected by tax and regulatory requirements, such as those relating to the environment.

REITs are sometimes informally characterized as equity REITs, mortgage REITs and hybrid REITs. An equity REIT invests primarily in the fee ownership or leasehold ownership of land and buildings, and derives its income primarily from rental income. An equity REIT may also realize capital gains (or losses) by selling real estate properties in its portfolio that have appreciated (or depreciated) in value. A mortgage REIT invests primarily in mortgages on real estate, which may secure construction, development or long-term loans, and derives its income primarily from interest payments on the credit it has extended. A hybrid REIT combines the characteristics of equity REITs and mortgage REITs, generally by holding both ownership interests and mortgage interests in real estate.

REITs are dependent upon management skill, are not diversified, and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation, and the possibility of

failing to qualify for conduit income tax treatment under the Code and failing to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act.

REITs (especially mortgage REITs) are subject to interest rate risk. Rising interest rates may cause REIT investors to demand a higher annual yield, which may, in turn, cause a decline in the market price of the equity securities issued by a REIT. Rising interest rates also generally increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could cause the value of the Fund’s REIT investments to decline. During periods when interest rates are declining, mortgages are often refinanced. Refinancing may reduce the yield on investments in mortgage REITs. In addition, because mortgage REITs depend on payment under their mortgage loans and leases to generate cash to make distributions to their shareholders, investments in REITs may be adversely affected by defaults on such mortgage loans or leases.

REITs are subject to management fees and other expenses. Therefore, investments in REITs will cause the Fund to bear its proportionate share of the costs of the REITs’ operations. At the same time, the Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in REITs. The Fund does not intend to invest in REITs unless, in the judgment of the Manager, the potential benefits of such investment justify the payment of any applicable fees.

These market conditions have resulted in fixed income instruments experiencing unusual liquidity issues, increased price volatility and, in some cases, credit downgrades and increased likelihood of default. These events have reduced the willingness and ability of some lenders to extend credit, and have made it more difficult for borrowers to obtain financing on attractive terms, if at all. The values of many types of securities, including, but not limited to, mortgage-backed, asset-backed and corporate debt securities, have been reduced. During times of market turmoil, investors tend to look to the safety of securities issued or backed by the U.S. Treasury, causing the prices of these securities to rise and the yield to decline.

The reduced liquidity in fixed income and credit markets may negatively affect many issuers worldwide. Illiquidity in these markets may mean there is less money available to purchase raw materials and goods and services, which may, in turn, bring down the prices of these economic staples. The values of some sovereign debt and of securities of issuers that hold that sovereign debt have fallen. These events and the potential for continuing market turbulence may have an adverse effect on the Fund. In addition, global economies and financial markets are becoming increasingly interconnected, which increases the possibilities that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or region.

Mortgage-backed securities have been especially affected by these market events. Beginning in 2008, the market for mortgage-related securities experienced substantially, often dramatically, lower valuations and greatly reduced liquidity. Markets for other asset-backed securities have also been affected. In the mortgage sector, there have been rising delinquency rates. These defaults have caused an unexpected degree of losses for holders. Some financial institutions and other enterprises may have large exposure to certain types of securities, such as mortgage-backed securities, which could have a negative effect on the broader economy. Questions have been raised about whether the quality of the underlying mortgages was misrepresented, and suits have been filed against some lenders and “bundlers” of mortgages. Traditional market participants have been less willing to make a market in some types of debt instruments, which has affected the liquidity of those instruments. Illiquid investments may be harder to value, especially in changing markets.

Some financial institutions and other enterprises may have large exposure to certain types of securities, such as mortgage-backed securities, which could have a negative effect on the broader economy. Events in the financial markets and the broader economy are continuing to erode the tax bases of many state and local governments, as well as their access to the credit markets. This has put downward pressure on the value of many municipal securities. Some traditional insurers of municipal securities have also experienced financial stress.

The U.S. federal government and certain foreign central banks have acted to calm credit markets and increase confidence in the U.S. and world economies. Certain of these entities have injected liquidity into the markets and taken other steps in an effort to stabilize the markets and grow the economy. Others have opted for austerity, which may limit growth, at least in the short to medium term. The ultimate effect of these efforts is only beginning to reveal itself. Changes in government policies may exacerbate the market’s difficulties and withdrawal of this support, or other policy changes by governments or central banks, could adversely impact the value and liquidity of certain securities.

The situation in the financial markets has resulted in calls for increased regulation, and the need of many financial institutions for government help has given lawmakers and regulators new leverage. The Dodd-Frank Act has initiated a dramatic revision of the U.S. financial regulatory framework that will continue to unfold over several years. The Dodd-Frank Act covers a broad range of topics, including (among many others) a reorganization of federal financial regulators; a process intended to improve financial systemic stability and the resolution of potentially insolvent financial firms; new rules for derivatives trading; the creation of a consumer financial protection watchdog; the registration and additional regulation of hedge and private equity fund managers; and new federal requirements for residential mortgage loans. Instruments in which the Fund may invest, or the issuers of such instruments, may be affected by the new legislation and regulation in ways that are unforeseeable. Many of the implementing regulations have not yet been finalized. Accordingly, the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act, including on the derivative instruments in which the Fund may invest, is not yet certain.

The statutory provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act significantly change in several respects the ways in which investment products are marketed, sold, settled or terminated. In particular, the Dodd-Frank Act mandates the elimination of references to credit ratings in numerous securities laws, including the 1940 Act. Certain swap derivatives have been and other derivatives

may be mandated for central clearing under the Dodd-Frank Act, which likely will require technological and other changes to the operations of funds governed by the 1940 Act and the market in which they will trade. Central clearing will also entail the use of assets of a 1940 Act fund to satisfy margin calls and this may have an effect on the performance of such a fund. The regulators have not yet issued final regulations implementing all of the Dodd-Frank Act’s margin requirements and clearing mandates.

The regulators that have been charged with the responsibility for implementing the Dodd-Frank Act (i.e., the SEC and the CFTC) have been active in proposing and adopting regulations and guidance on the use of derivatives by 1940 Act funds. The CFTC recently adopted a revision to one of its rules that will either restrict the use of derivatives by a 1940 Act fund (see “Regulatory Limitations on Using Futures, Options on Futures, and Swaps”) or require the fund’s adviser to register as a commodity pool operator. The SEC is reviewing its current guidance on the use of derivatives by 1940 Act funds and may issue new guidance. It is not clear whether or when such new guidance will be published or what the content of such guidance may be.

Because the situation in the markets is widespread and largely unprecedented, it may be unusually difficult to identify both risks and opportunities using past models of the interplay of market forces, or to predict the duration of these market conditions.

Repurchase Agreements . In a repurchase agreement, the Fund purchases securities from a bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System or also from a foreign bank or from a U.S. branch or agency of a foreign bank or from a securities dealer that agrees to repurchase the securities from the Fund at a higher price on a designated future date. Repurchase agreements generally are for a short period of time, usually less than a week. Costs, delays, or losses could result if the selling party to a repurchase agreement becomes bankrupt or otherwise defaults. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of sellers. If the Fund enters into a repurchase agreement subject to foreign law and the counter-party defaults, the Fund may not enjoy protections comparable to those provided to certain repurchase agreements under U.S. bankruptcy law and may suffer delays and losses in disposing of the collateral as a result.

Policies and Limitations . Repurchase agreements with a maturity or demand of more than seven days are considered to be illiquid securities. The Fund may not enter into a repurchase agreement with a maturity or demand of more than seven days if, as a result, more than 15% of the value of its net assets would then be invested in such repurchase agreements and other illiquid securities. The Fund may enter into a repurchase agreement only if (1) the underlying securities (excluding maturity and duration limitations, if any) are of a type that the Fund’s investment policies and limitations would allow it to purchase directly, (2) the market value of the underlying securities, including accrued interest, at all times equals or exceeds the repurchase price, and (3) payment for the underlying securities is made only upon satisfactory evidence that the securities are being held for the Fund’s account by its custodian or a bank acting as the Fund’s agent.

Restricted Securities and Rule 144A Securities . The Fund may invest in “restricted securities,” which generally are securities that may be resold to the public only pursuant to an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act or an exemption from registration. Regulation S under the 1933 Act is an exemption from registration that permits, under certain circumstances,

the resale of restricted securities in offshore transactions, subject to certain conditions, and Rule 144A under the 1933 Act is an exemption that permits the resale of certain restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers.

Since its adoption by the SEC in 1990, Rule 144A has facilitated trading of restricted securities among qualified institutional investors. To the extent restricted securities held by the Fund qualify under Rule 144A and an institutional market develops for those securities, the Fund expects that it will be able to dispose of the securities without registering the resale of such securities under the 1933 Act. However, to the extent that a robust market for such 144A securities does not develop, or a market develops but experiences periods of illiquidity, investments in Rule 144A securities could increase the level of the Fund’s illiquidity. The Manager, acting under guidelines established by the Fund Trustees, will determine whether investments in Rule 144A securities are liquid or illiquid.

Where an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act is unavailable, or where an institutional market is limited, a Fund may, in certain circumstances, be permitted to require the issuer of restricted securities held by the Fund to file a registration statement to register the resale of such securities under the 1933 Act. In such case, the Fund will typically be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses, and a considerable period may elapse between the decision to sell and the time the Fund may be permitted to resell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, or the value of the security were to decline, the Fund might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to sell. Restricted securities for which no market exists are priced by a method that the Fund Trustees believe accurately reflects fair value.

Policies and Limitations . To the extent restricted securities, including Rule 144A securities, are deemed illiquid, purchases thereof will be subject to the Fund’s 15% limitation on investments in illiquid securities.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements . In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Fund sells portfolio securities subject to its agreement to repurchase the securities at a later date for a fixed price reflecting a market rate of interest. Reverse repurchase agreements may increase fluctuations in the Fund’s NAV and may be viewed as a form of leverage. There is a risk that the counter-party to a reverse repurchase agreement will be unable or unwilling to complete the transaction as scheduled, which may result in losses to the Fund. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties to reverse repurchase agreements.

Policies and Limitations . Reverse repurchase agreements are considered borrowings for purposes of the Fund’s investment policies and limitations concerning borrowings. While a reverse repurchase agreement is outstanding, the Fund will deposit in a segregated account with its custodian, or designate on its records as segregated, cash or appropriate liquid securities, marked to market daily, in an amount at least equal to the Fund’s obligations under the agreement.

Risks of Reliance on Computer Programs or Codes. Many processes used in fund management, including security selection, rely, in whole or in part, on the use of computer programs or codes, some of which are created or maintained by a Manager or its affiliates and some of which are created or maintained by third parties. Errors in these programs or codes may

go undetected, possibly for quite some time, which could adversely affect the Fund’s operations or performance. Computer programs or codes are susceptible to human error when they are first created and as they are developed and maintained. Some funds, like the Fund, may be subject to heightened risk in this area because the funds’ advisers rely to a greater extent on computer programs or codes in managing the fund’s assets.

While efforts are made to guard against problems associated with computer programs or codes, there can be no assurance that such efforts will always be successful. The Fund has limited insight into the computer programs and processes of some service providers, and may have to rely on contractual assurances or business relationships to protect against some errors in the service providers’ systems.

Securities Loans . The Fund may lend portfolio securities to banks, brokerage firms, and other institutional investors, provided that cash or equivalent collateral, initially equal to at least 102% (105% in the case of foreign securities) of the market value of the loaned securities, is maintained by the borrower with the Fund or with the Fund’s lending agent, who holds the collateral on the Fund’s behalf. Thereafter, cash or equivalent collateral, equal to at least 100% of the market value of the loaned securities, is to be continuously maintained by the borrower with the Fund. The Fund may invest the cash collateral and earn income, or it may receive an agreed upon amount of interest income from a borrower that has delivered equivalent collateral. During the time securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Fund an amount equivalent to any dividends or interest paid on such securities. These loans are subject to termination at the option of the Fund or the borrower. The Fund may pay reasonable administrative and custodial fees in connection with a loan and may pay a negotiated portion of the interest earned on the cash or equivalent collateral to the borrower. The Fund does not have the right to vote on securities while they are on loan. However, it is the Fund’s policy to attempt to terminate loans in time to vote those proxies that the Fund has determined are material to the interests of the Fund. The Manager believes the risk of loss on these transactions is slight because if a borrower were to default for any reason, the collateral should satisfy the obligation. However, as with other extensions of secured credit, loans of portfolio securities involve some risk of loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially. Subject to compliance with the conditions of an SEC exemptive order, the Fund may loan securities through a separate operating unit of Neuberger Berman LLC (“Neuberger Berman”) or an affiliate of Neuberger Berman, acting as agent. The Fund also may loan securities to Neuberger Berman and its affiliates (other than NB Management), subject to the conditions of the SEC order. The Fund may also loan securities through other third parties not affiliated with Neuberger Berman who would act as agent to lend securities to principal borrowers. The Fund may also borrow a security for purposes of effecting a short sale of such security. See “Short Sales” for additional information on the Fund’s activities related to borrowing securities.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund may lend portfolio securities with a value not exceeding 33-1/3% of its total assets (taken at current value) to banks, brokerage firms, or other institutional investors. The Fund has authorized J.P. Morgan Worldwide Securities Services (“JP Morgan Securities) to effect loans of available securities with entities on J.P. Morgan Securities approved list of borrowers, which may include JP Morgan Securities and its affiliates. The Fund may obtain a list of these approved borrowers. Borrowers are required continuously to secure their obligations to return securities on loan from the Fund by depositing collateral in a form determined to be satisfactory by the Fund Trustees. The collateral, which must be marked to

market daily, must be initially equal to at least 102% (105% in the case of foreign securities) of the market value of the loaned securities, which will also be marked to market daily. Thereafter, the collateral must be equal to at least 100% of the market value of the loaned securities. See “Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions” for information on how the cash collateral may be invested. The Fund does not count the collateral for purposes of any investment policy or limitation that requires the Fund to invest specific percentages of its assets in accordance with its principal investment program.

Securities of Exchange-Traded Funds and Other Exchange-Traded Investment Vehicles . The Fund may invest in the securities of exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) and other pooled investment vehicles that are traded on an exchange and that hold a portfolio of securities or other financial instruments (collectively, “exchange-traded investment vehicles”). When investing in the securities of exchange-traded investment vehicles, the Fund will be indirectly exposed to all the risks of the portfolio securities or other financial instruments they hold. The performance of an exchange-traded investment vehicle will be reduced by transaction and other expenses, including fees paid by the exchange-traded investment vehicle to service providers. ETFs are investment companies that are registered as open-end management companies or unit investment trusts. The limits that apply to the Fund’s investment in securities of other investment companies generally apply also to the Fund’s investment in securities of ETFs. See “Securities of Other Investment Companies.”

Shares of exchange-traded investment vehicles are listed and traded in the secondary market. Many exchange-traded investment vehicles are passively managed and seek to provide returns that track the price and yield performance of a particular index or otherwise provide exposure to an asset class (e.g., currencies or commodities). Although such exchange-traded investment vehicles may invest in other instruments, they largely hold the securities (e.g., common stocks) of the relevant index or financial instruments that provide exposure to the relevant asset class. The share price of an exchange-traded investment vehicle may not track its specified market index, if any, and may trade below its net asset value. An active secondary market in the shares of an exchange-traded investment vehicle may not develop or be maintained and may be halted or interrupted due to actions by its listing exchange, unusual market conditions, or other reasons. There can be no assurance that the shares of an exchange-traded investment vehicle will continue to be listed on an active exchange.

Securities of Other Investment Companies . The Fund may invest in the securities of other investment companies, including open-end and closed-end management companies and unit investment trusts, that are consistent with its investment objectives and policies. Such an investment may be the most practical or only manner in which the Fund can invest in certain asset classes or participate in certain markets, such as foreign markets, because of the expenses involved or because other vehicles for investing in those markets may not be available at the time the Fund is ready to make an investment. When investing in the securities of other investment companies, the Fund will be indirectly exposed to all the risks of such investment companies’ portfolio securities. In addition, as a shareholder in an investment company, the Fund would indirectly bear its pro rata share of that investment company’s expenses. An investment in the securities of other investment companies may involve the payment of substantial premiums above, while the sale of such securities may be made at substantial discounts from, the value of such issuers' portfolio securities. The Fund does not intend to invest in the securities of other investment companies unless, in the judgment of the

Manager, the potential benefits of such investment justify the payment of any applicable premium or sales charge.

Although money market funds that operate in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act seek to preserve a $1.00 share price, it is possible for the Fund to lose money by investing in money market funds.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund may invest an unlimited amount of its uninvested cash in shares of money market funds that operate in compliance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, whether or not advised by NB Management or an affiliate, under specified conditions. See “Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions.”

Otherwise, the Fund’s investment in securities of other investment companies is generally limited to (i) 3% of the total voting stock of any one investment company, (ii) 5% of the Fund’s total assets with respect to any one investment company and (iii) 10% of the Fund’s total assets in all investment companies in the aggregate. However, the Fund may exceed these limits when investing in shares of an ETF, subject to the terms and conditions of an exemptive order from the SEC obtained by the ETF that permits an investing fund, such as the Fund, to invest in the ETF in excess of the limits described above.

The Fund is also able to invest up to 100% of its total assets in a master portfolio with the same investment objectives, policies and limitations as the Fund.

Short Sales . The Fund may use short sales in an attempt to realize gain or for hedging purposes. To effect a short sale, the Fund borrows a security from or through a brokerage firm to make delivery to the buyer. The Fund is then obliged to replace the borrowed security by purchasing it at the market price at the time of replacement. Until the security is replaced, the Fund is required to pay the lender any dividends on the borrowed security and may be required to pay loan fees or interest.

The Fund may realize a gain if the security declines in price between the date of the short sale and the date on which the Fund replaces the borrowed security. The Fund will incur a loss if the price of the security increases between those dates. The amount of any gain will be decreased, and the amount of any loss increased, by the amount of any premium or interest the Fund is required to pay in connection with the short sale. A short position may be adversely affected by imperfect correlation between movements in the price of the securities sold short and the securities being hedged.

The Fund may also make short sales against-the-box, in which it sells short securities only if it owns or has the right to obtain without payment of additional consideration an equal amount of the same type of securities sold.

The effect of short selling is similar to the effect of leverage. Short selling may amplify changes in the Fund’s NAV. Short selling may also produce higher than normal portfolio turnover, which may result in increased transaction costs to the Fund.

When the Fund is selling stocks short, it must maintain a segregated account of cash or high-grade securities that, together with any collateral (exclusive of short sale proceeds) that it is required

to deposit with the securities lender or the executing broker, is at least equal to the value of the shorted securities, marked to market daily. As a result, the Fund may need to maintain high levels of cash or liquid assets (such as U.S. Treasury bills, money market accounts, repurchase agreements, certificates of deposit, high quality commercial paper and long equity positions). The Fund may also utilize borrowings or the collateral obtained from securities lending for this purpose, which would increase the leveraging effect of this transaction.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund’s ability to engage in short sales may be impaired by any temporary prohibitions on short selling imposed by domestic and certain foreign government regulators.

Stripped Mortgage Backed Securities (SMBS) . SMBS are derivative multi-class mortgage securities. SMBS may be issued by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. Government, or by private originators of, or investors in, mortgage loans, including savings and loan associations, mortgage banks, commercial banks, investment banks and special purpose entities of the foregoing.

SMBS are usually structured with two classes that receive different proportions of the interest and principal distributions on a pool of mortgage assets. A common type of SMBS will have one class receiving some of the interest and most of the principal from the mortgage assets, while the other class will receive most of the interest and the remainder of the principal. In the most extreme case, one class will receive all of the interest (the interest-only or “IO” class), while the other class will receive all of the principal (the principal-only or “PO” class). The yield to maturity on an IO class is extremely sensitive to the rate of principal payments (including prepayments) on the related underlying mortgage assets, and a rapid rate of principal payments may have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s yield to maturity from these securities. If the underlying mortgage assets experience greater than anticipated prepayments of principal, the Fund may fail to recoup some or all of its initial investment in these securities even if the security is in one of the highest rating categories.

Although SMBS are purchased and sold by institutional investors through several investment banking firms acting as brokers or dealers, these securities were only recently developed. As a result, established trading markets have not yet developed and, accordingly, these securities may be deemed “illiquid” and subject to the Fund’s limitations on investments in illiquid securities.

Stripped Securities . Stripped Securities are the separate income or principal components of a debt security. The risks associated with stripped securities are similar to those of other debt securities, although stripped securities may be more volatile, and the value of certain types of stripped securities may move in the same direction as interest rates. U.S. Treasury securities that have been stripped by a Federal Reserve Bank are obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury.

Privately stripped government securities are created when a dealer deposits a U.S. Treasury security or other U.S. Government security with a custodian for safekeeping. The custodian issues separate receipts for the coupon payments and the principal payment, which the dealer then sells. These coupons are not obligations of the U.S. Treasury.

Structured Notes . The Fund may invest in structured notes, such as participatory notes, issued by banks or broker-dealers that are designed to replicate the performance of an underlying indicator. Underlying indicators may include a security or other financial instrument, asset, currency, interest rate, credit rating, commodity, volatility measure or index. Generally, investments in such notes are used as a substitute for positions in underlying indicators. Structured notes are a type of equity-linked derivative which generally are traded over-the-counter (“OTC”). The performance results of structured notes will not replicate exactly the performance of the underlying indicator that the notes seek to replicate due to transaction costs and other expenses.

Investments in structured notes involve the same risks associated with a direct investment in the underlying indicator the notes seek to replicate. The return on a structured note that is linked to a particular underlying indicator generally is increased to the extent of any dividends paid in connection with the underlying indicator. However, the holder of a structured note typically does not receive voting rights and other rights as it would if it directly owned the underlying indicator. In addition, structured notes are subject to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the broker-dealer or bank that issues the notes will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with the Fund. Structured notes constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the banks or broker-dealers that issue them, and the Fund is relying on the creditworthiness of such banks or broker-dealers and has no rights under a structured note against the issuer of an underlying indicator. Structured notes involve transaction costs. Structured notes may be considered illiquid and, therefore, structured notes considered illiquid will be subject to the Fund’s percentage limitation on investments in illiquid securities.

Terrorism Risks . Some of the U.S. securities markets were closed for a four-day period as a result of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001. These terrorist attacks, the war with Iraq and its aftermath, occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan by coalition forces and related events have led to increased short-term market volatility and may have long-term effects on U.S. and world economies and markets. Those events could also have an acute effect on individual issuers, related groups of issuers, or issuers concentrated in a single geographic area. A similar disruption of the financial markets or other terrorist attacks could adversely impact interest rates, auctions, secondary trading, ratings, credit risk, inflation and other factors relating to portfolio securities and adversely affect Fund service providers and the Fund’s operations.

U.S. Government and Agency Securities . “U.S. Government Securities” are obligations of the U.S. Treasury backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Due to recent market turbulence, some investors have turned to the safety of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury, causing the prices of these securities to rise and their yields to decline. As a result of this and other market influences, yields of short-term U.S. Treasury debt instruments are currently near historical lows.

“U.S. Government Agency Securities” are issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies, or by instrumentalities of the U.S. Government, such as the Ginnie Mae (also known as the Government National Mortgage Association), Fannie Mae (also known as the Federal National Mortgage Association), Freddie Mac (also known as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation), SLM Corporation (formerly, the Student Loan Marketing Association) (commonly

known as “Sallie Mae”), Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLB”), and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Some U.S. Government Agency Securities are supported by the full faith and credit of the United States, while others may be supported by the issuer’s ability to borrow from the U.S. Treasury, subject to the U.S. Treasury’s discretion in certain cases, or only by the credit of the issuer. Accordingly, there is at least a possibility of default. U.S. Government Agency Securities include U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities. (See “Mortgage-Backed Securities,” above.) The market prices of U.S. Government Agency Securities are not guaranteed by the U.S. Government and generally fluctuate inversely with changing interest rates.

U.S. Government Agency Securities are deemed to include (i) securities for which the payment of principal and interest is backed by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by the U.S. Government, its agencies, authorities or instrumentalities and (ii) participations in loans made to foreign governments or their agencies that are so guaranteed. The secondary market for certain of these participations is extremely limited. In the absence of a suitable secondary market, such participations may therefore be regarded as illiquid.

The Fund may invest in separately traded principal and interest components of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury. The principal and interest components of selected securities are traded independently under the Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities (“STRIPS”) program. Under the STRIPS program, the principal and interest components are individually numbered and separately issued by the U.S. Treasury at the request of depository financial institutions, which then trade the component parts independently. The market prices of STRIPS generally are more volatile than that of U.S. Treasury bills with comparable maturities.

Variable or Floating Rate Securities; Demand and Put Features . Variable rate and floating rate securities provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate at fixed intervals (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually) or automatic adjustment of the interest rate whenever a specified interest rate or index changes. The interest rate on variable and floating rate securities (collectively, “Adjustable Rate Securities”) ordinarily is determined by reference to a particular bank’s prime rate, the 90-day U.S. Treasury Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank CDs, an index of short-term tax-exempt rates or some other objective measure.

Adjustable Rate Securities frequently permit the holder to demand payment of the obligations’ principal and accrued interest at any time or at specified intervals not exceeding one year. The demand feature usually is backed by a credit instrument (e.g., a bank letter of credit) from a creditworthy issuer and sometimes by insurance from a creditworthy insurer. In purchasing these securities, the Fund relies primarily on the creditworthiness of the credit instrument issuer or the insurer. The Fund can also buy fixed rate securities accompanied by a demand feature or by a put option, which permits the Fund to sell the security to the issuer or third party at a specified price. The Fund may rely on the creditworthiness of issuers of the credit enhancements in purchasing these securities.

Warrants and Rights . Warrants and rights may be acquired by the Fund in connection with other securities or separately. Warrants are securities permitting, but not obligating, their holder to subscribe for other securities or commodities at a later date. Rights are similar to

warrants but typically are issued by a company to existing holders of its stock and provide those holders the right to purchase additional shares of stock at a later date. Rights also normally have a shorter duration than warrants. Warrants and rights do not carry with them the right to dividends or voting rights with respect to the securities that they entitle their holder to purchase, and they do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuer. As a result, warrants and rights may be considered more speculative than certain other types of investments. In addition, the value of a warrant or right does not necessarily change with the value of the underlying securities. The purchase of warrants and rights involves the risk that the Fund could lose the purchase value of the warrants or rights if the right to subscribe to additional shares is not exercised prior to the warrants’ or rights’ expiration date because warrants and rights cease to have value if they are not exercised prior to their expiration date. Also, the purchase of warrants and rights involves the risk that the effective price paid for the warrants or rights added to the subscription price of the related security may exceed the value of the subscribed security’s market price such as when there is no movement in the price of the underlying security. The market for warrants or rights may be very limited and it may be difficult to sell them promptly at an acceptable price.

When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Securities and Forward Commitments . The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis and may purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment basis. These transactions involve a commitment by the Fund to purchase or sell securities at a future date (ordinarily within two months, although the Fund may agree to a longer settlement period). These transactions may involve mortgage-backed securities such as Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac certificates. The price of the underlying securities (usually expressed in terms of yield) and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for (the settlement date) are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. When-issued and delayed delivery purchases and forward commitment transactions are negotiated directly with the other party, and such commitments are not traded on exchanges.

When-issued and delayed delivery purchases and forward commitment transactions enable the Fund to “lock in” what the Manager believes to be an attractive price or yield on a particular security for a period of time, regardless of future changes in interest rates. For instance, in periods of rising interest rates and falling prices, the Fund might sell securities it owns on a forward commitment basis to limit its exposure to falling prices. In periods of falling interest rates and rising prices, the Fund might purchase a security on a when-issued, delayed delivery or forward commitment basis and sell a similar security to settle such purchase, thereby obtaining the benefit of currently higher yields. When issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment transactions are subject to the risk that a counterparty may fail to complete the purchase or sale of the security. If this occurs, the Fund may lose the opportunity to purchase or sell the security at the agreed upon price. To reduce this risk, the Fund will enter into transactions with established counterparties and the managers will monitor the creditworthiness of such counterparties.

The value of securities purchased on a when-issued, delayed delivery or forward commitment basis and any subsequent fluctuations in their value are reflected in the computation of the Fund’s NAV starting on the date of the agreement to purchase the securities. Because the Fund has not yet paid for the securities, this produces an effect similar to leverage. The Fund does not earn interest on securities it has committed to purchase until the securities are paid for and delivered on the settlement date. Because the Fund is committed to buying them at a certain

price, any change in the value of these securities, even prior to their issuance, affects the value of the Fund’s interests. The purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis also involves a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines before the settlement date. When the Fund makes a forward commitment to sell securities it owns, the proceeds to be received upon settlement are included in the Fund’s assets. Fluctuations in the market value of the underlying securities are not reflected in the Fund’s NAV as long as the commitment to sell remains in effect.

When-issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment transactions may cause the Fund to liquidate positions when it may not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its purchase or sale obligations.

Policies and Limitations . The Fund will purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, or purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment basis only with the intention of completing the transaction and actually purchasing or selling the securities. If deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy, however, the Fund may dispose of or renegotiate a commitment after it has been entered into. The Fund also may sell securities it has committed to purchase before those securities are delivered to the Fund on the settlement date. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses in connection with these transactions.

The Fund may also enter into a TBA agreement and “roll over” such agreement prior to the settlement date by selling the obligation to purchase the pools set forth in the agreement and entering into a new TBA agreement for future delivery of pools of mortgage-backed securities. TBA mortgage- backed securities may increase prepayment risks because the underlying mortgages may be less favorable than anticipated by the Fund.

When the Fund purchases securities on a when-issued, delayed delivery or forward commitment basis, the Fund will deposit in a segregated account with its custodian, or designate on its records as segregated, until payment is made, appropriate liquid securities having a value (determined daily) at least equal to the amount of the Fund’s purchase commitments. In the case of a forward commitment to sell portfolio securities, the portfolio securities will be held in a segregated account, or the portfolio securities will be designated on the Fund’s records as segregated, while the commitment is outstanding. These procedures are designed to ensure that the Fund maintains sufficient assets at all times to cover its obligations under when-issued and delayed delivery purchases and forward commitment transactions.

Zero Coupon Securities . The Fund may invest in zero coupon securities. These securities are debt obligations that do not entitle the holder to any periodic payment of interest prior to maturity or that specify a future date when the securities begin to pay current interest. Zero coupon securities are issued and traded at a discount from their face amount or par value (known as “original issue discount” or “OID”). OID varies depending on prevailing interest rates, the time remaining until cash payments begin, the liquidity of the security, and the perceived credit quality of the issuer.

OID must be included in the Fund’s gross income ratably prior to the receipt of any actual payments. Because the Fund must distribute substantially all of its net investment income (including its accrued OID) to its shareholders each taxable year to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC

and to minimize or avoid payment of federal income and excise taxes, it may have to dispose of portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash, or may be required to borrow, to satisfy the distribution requirements. See “Additional Tax Information.”

The market prices of zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the prices of securities that pay interest periodically. Zero coupon securities are likely to respond to changes in interest rates to a greater degree than other types of debt securities having a similar maturity and credit quality.

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

The Fund’s performance figures are based on historical results and are not intended to indicate future performance. The share price and total return of the Fund will vary, and an investment in the Fund, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than an investor’s original cost.

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

The following tables set forth information concerning the Fund Trustees and officers of the Trust. All persons named as Fund Trustees and officers also serve in similar capacities for other funds administered or managed by NB Management. A Fund Trustee who is not an “interested person” of NB Management (including its affiliates) or the Trust is deemed to be an independent fund Trustee (“Independent Fund Trustee”).

Information about the Board of Trustees

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Fund Trustee	Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex by Fund Trustee (3)
Independent Fund Trustees
Faith Colish (1935)	Trustee since inception	Counsel, Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP (law firm) since October 2002; formerly, Attorney-at-Law and President, Faith Colish, A Professional Corporation, 1980 to 2002.	55	Formerly, Director, 1997 to 2003, and Advisory Director, 2003 to 2006, ABA Retirement Funds (formerly, American Bar Retirement Association) (not-for-profit membership corporation).

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Fund Trustee	Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex by Fund Trustee (3)
Martha C. Goss (1949)	Trustee since 2007	President, Woodhill Enterprises Inc./Chase Hollow Associates LLC (personal investment vehicle), since 2006; formerly, Consultant, Resources Global Professionals (temporary staffing), 2002 to 2006.	55	Director, American Water (water utility), since 2003; Director, Allianz Life of New York (insurance), since 2005; Director, Berger Group Holdings, Inc. (engineering consulting firm), since 2013; Director, Financial Women’s Association of New York (not-for-profit association), since 2003; Trustee Emerita, Brown University, since 1998; Director, Museum of American Finance (not-for-profit), since 2013; formerly, Non-Executive Chair and Director, Channel Reinsurance (financial guaranty reinsurance), 2006 to 2010; formerly, Director, Ocwen Financial Corporation (mortgage servicing), 2005 to 2010; formerly, Director, Claire’s Stores, Inc. (retailer), 2005 to 2007; formerly, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. (engineering consulting firm), 2007 to 2010; formerly Director, Bank Leumi (commercial bank), 2005 to 2007; formerly Advisory Board Member, Attensity (software developer), 2005 to 2007.
Michael M. Knetter (1960)	Trustee since 2007	President and Chief Executive Officer, University of Wisconsin Foundation, since October 2010; formerly, Dean, School of Business, University of Wisconsin - Madison; formerly, Professor of International Economics and Associate Dean, Amos Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College, 1998 to 2002.	55	Director, American Family Insurance (a mutual company, not publicly traded), since March 2009; formerly, Trustee, Northwestern Mutual Series Fund, Inc., 2007 to 2010; formerly, Director, Wausau Paper, 2005 to 2011; formerly, Director, Great Wolf Resorts, 2004 to 2009.

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Fund Trustee	Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex by Fund Trustee (3)
Howard A. Mileaf (1937)	Trustee since inception	Retired ; formerly, Vice President and General Counsel, WHX Corporation (holding company), 1993 to 2001.	55	Formerly, Director, Webfinancial Corporation (holding company), 2002 to 2008; formerly, Director, WHX Corporation (holding company), 2002 to 2005; formerly, Director, State Theatre of New Jersey (not-for-profit theatre), 2000 to 2005.
George W. Morriss (1947)	Trustee since 2007	Adjunct Professor, Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, since October 2012; formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, People’s Bank, Connecticut (a financial services company), 1991 to 2001.	55	Director and Treasurer, National Association of Corporate Directors, Connecticut Chapter, since 2013; Trustee, Steben Alternative Investment Funds, Steben Select Multi- Strategy Fund, and Steben Select Multi-Strategy Master Fund, since 2013; formerly, Manager, Larch Lane Multi-Strategy Fund complex (which consisted of three funds), 2006 to 2011; formerly, Member, NASDAQ Issuers’ Affairs Committee, 1995 to 2003.
Tom D. Seip (1950)	Trustee since inception; Chairman of the Board since 2008; Lead Independent Trustee from 2006 to 2008	General Partner, Ridgefield Farm LLC (a private investment vehicle); formerly, President and CEO, Westaff, Inc. (temporary staffing), May 2001 to January 2002; formerly, Senior Executive, The Charles Schwab Corporation, 1983 to 1998, including Chief Executive Officer, Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.; Trustee, Schwab Family of Funds and Schwab Investments, 1997 to 1998; and Executive Vice President-Retail Brokerage, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 1994 to 1997.	55	Director, H&R Block, Inc. (financial services company), since May 2001; Chairman, Governance and Nominating Committee, H&R Block, Inc., since 2011; formerly, Chairman, Compensation Committee, H&R Block, Inc., 2006 to 2010; formerly, Director, Forward Management, Inc. (asset management company), 1999 to 2006.

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Fund Trustee	Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex by Fund Trustee (3)
Candace L. Straight (1947)	Trustee since inception	Private investor and consultant specializing in the insurance industry; formerly, Advisory Director, Securitas Capital LLC (a global private equity investment firm dedicated to making investments in the insurance sector), 1998 to December 2003.	55	Public Member, Board of Governors and Board of Trustees, Rutgers University, since 2011; Director, Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. (reinsurance company), since 2006; formerly, Director, National Atlantic Holdings Corporation (property and casualty insurance company), 2004 to 2008; formerly, Director, The Proformance Insurance Company (property and casualty insurance company), 2004 to 2008; formerly, Director, Providence Washington Insurance Company (property and casualty insurance company), 1998 to 2006; formerly, Director, Summit Global Partners (insurance brokerage firm), 2000 to 2005.
Peter P. Trapp (1944)	Trustee since inception	Retired; formerly, Regional Manager for Mid-Southern Region, Ford Motor Credit Company, September 1997 to 2007; formerly, President, Ford Life Insurance Company, April 1995 to August 1997.	55	None.

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Fund Trustee	Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex by Fund Trustee (3)
Fund Trustees who are “Interested Persons”
Joseph V. Amato* (1962)	Trustee since 2009	President and Director, Neuberger Berman Group LLC, since 2009; President and Chief Executive Officer, Neuberger Berman and Neuberger Berman Holdings LLC (including its predecessor, Neuberger Berman Inc.), since 2007; Chief Investment Officer, Neuberger Berman, since 2009; Chief Investment Officer (Equities) and Managing Director, NB Management, since 2009; Managing Director, Neuberger Berman Fixed Income LLC (“NBFI”), since 2007; Board member of NBFI since 2006; formerly, Global Head of Asset Management of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s (“LBHI”) Investment Management Division, 2006 to 2009; formerly, member of LBHI’s Investment Management Division’s Executive Management Committee, 2006 to 2009; formerly, Managing Director, Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”), 2006 to 2008; formerly, Chief Recruiting and Development Officer, LBI, 2005 to 2006; formerly, Global Head of LBI’s Equity Sales and a Member of its Equities Division Executive Committee, 2003 to 2005.	55	Member of Board of Advisors, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, since 2001; Member of New York City Board of Advisors, Teach for America, since 2005; Trustee, Montclair Kimberley Academy (private school), since 2007; Member, Board of Regents, Georgetown University, since 2013.
Robert Conti* (1956)	Chief Executive Officer, President and Trustee since 2008; prior thereto, Executive Vice President in 2008 and Vice President from inception to 2008	Managing Director, Neuberger Berman, since 2007; formerly, Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2003 to 2006; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 1999 to 2003; President and Chief Executive Officer, NB Management, since 2008; formerly, Senior Vice President, NB Management, 2000 to 2008; Managing Director, NBFI, since 2009.	55	Director, Staten Island Mental Health Society, since 1994; formerly, Chairman of the Board, Staten Island Mental Health Society, 2008 to 2011.

	(1)	The business address of each listed person is 605 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10158.
	(2)	Pursuant to the Trust’s Trust Instrument, each of these Fund Trustees shall hold office for life or until his or her successor is elected or the Trust terminates; except that (a) any Fund Trustee may resign by delivering a written resignation; (b) any Fund Trustee may be removed with or without cause at any time by a written instrument signed by at least two-thirds of the other Fund Trustees; (c) any Fund Trustee who requests to be retired, or who has become unable to serve, may be retired by a written instrument signed by a majority of the other Fund Trustees; and (d) any Fund Trustee may be removed at any shareholder meeting by a vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares.
	(3)	Except as otherwise indicated, each individual has held the positions shown for at least the last five years.
	*	Indicates a Fund Trustee who is an “interested person” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Mr. Amato and Mr. Conti are interested persons of the Trust by virtue of the fact that each is an officer of NB Management and/or its affiliates.

Information about the Officers of the Trust

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)
Andrew B. Allard (1961)	Chief Legal Officer since 2013 (only for purposes of sections 307 and 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer since inception	General Counsel and Senior Vice President, NB Management since 2013; Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006 and Employee since 1999; Deputy General Counsel, Neuberger Berman, since 2004; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2000 to 2005; formerly, Employee, NB Management, 1994 to 1999; Chief Legal Officer since 2013 (only for purposes of sections 307 and 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (ten since 2013); Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (six since 2002, one since 2003, one since 2005, one since 2006 and one since 2013).
Claudia A. Brandon (1956)	Executive Vice President since 2008 and Secretary since inception	Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2007 and Employee since 1999; Senior Vice President, NB Management, since 2008 and Assistant Secretary since 2004; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2002 to 2006; formerly, Vice President-Mutual Fund Board Relations, NB Management, 2000 to 2008; formerly, Vice President, NB Management, 1986 to 1999 and Employee 1984 to 1999; Executive Vice President, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (nine since 2008 and one since 2013); Secretary, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (three since 1985, three since 2002, one since 2003, one since 2005, one since 2006 and one since 2013).
Agnes Diaz (1971)	Vice President since 2013	Vice President, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (ten since 2013).

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)
Anthony DiBernardo (1979)	Assistant Treasurer since 2011	Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2009; Employee, NB Management, since 2003; Assistant Treasurer, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (nine since 2011 and one since 2013).
Sheila R. James (1965)	Assistant Secretary since inception	Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2008 and Employee since 1999; formerly, Assistant Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2007; formerly, Employee, NB Management, 1991 to 1999; Assistant Secretary, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (six since 2002, one since 2003, one since 2005, one since 2006 and one since 2013).
Brian Kerrane (1969)	Vice President since 2008	Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2002 to 2006; Vice President, NB Management, since 2008 and Employee since 1991; Vice President, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (nine since 2008 and one since 2013).
Kevin Lyons (1955)	Assistant Secretary since inception	Assistant Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2008 and Employee since 1999; formerly, Employee, NB Management, 1993 to 1999; Assistant Secretary, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (seven since 2003, one since 2005, one since 2006 and one since 2013).
Owen F. McEntee, Jr. (1961)	Vice President since 2008	Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; Employee, NB Management, since 1992; Vice President, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (nine since 2008 and one since 2013).

Name, (Year of Birth), and Address (1)	Position(s) and Length of Time Served (2)	Principal Occupation(s) (3)
John M. McGovern (1970)	Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer since inception	Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2007; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2004 to 2006; Employee, NB Management, since 1993; Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (eight since 2005, one since 2006 and one since 2013); formerly, Assistant Treasurer, eight registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator, 2002 to 2005.
Frank Rosato (1971)	Assistant Treasurer since inception	Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; Employee, NB Management, since 1995; Assistant Treasurer, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (eight since 2005, one since 2006 and one since 2013).
Neil S. Siegel (1967)	Vice President since 2008	Managing Director, NB Management, since 2008; Managing Director, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; formerly, Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2004 to 2006; Vice President, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (nine since 2008 and one since 2013).
Chamaine Williams (1971)	Chief Compliance Officer since inception	Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2007; Chief Compliance Officer, NB Management, since 2006; Chief Compliance Officer, ten registered investment companies for which NB Management acts as investment manager and administrator (eight since 2005, one since 2006 and one since 2013); formerly, Senior Vice President, LBI, 2007 to 2008; formerly, Vice President, LBI, 2003 to 2006; formerly, Chief Compliance Officer, Lehman Brothers Asset Management Inc., 2003 to 2007; formerly, Chief Compliance Officer, Lehman Brothers Alternative Investment Management LLC, 2003 to 2007.

____________________

	(1)	The business address of each listed person is 605 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10158.
	(2)	Pursuant to the By-Laws of the Trust, each officer elected by the Fund Trustees shall hold office until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, inability to serve, or resignation. Officers serve at the pleasure of the Fund Trustees and may be removed at any time with or without cause.
	(3)	Except as otherwise indicated, each individual has held the positions shown for at least the last five years.

The Board of Trustees

The Board of Trustees (“Board”) is responsible for managing the business and affairs of the Trust. Among other things, the Board generally oversees the portfolio management of the Fund and reviews and approves the Fund’s investment advisory and subadvisory contracts and other principal contracts.

The Board has appointed an Independent Fund Trustee to serve in the role of Chairman of the Board. The Chair’s primary responsibilities are (i) to participate in the preparation of the agenda for meetings of the Board and in the identification of information to be presented to the Board; (ii) to preside at all meetings of the Board; (iii) to act as the Board’s liaison with management between meetings of the Board; and (iv) to act as the primary contact for board communications. The Chair may perform such other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time. Except for any duties specified herein or pursuant to the Trust’s Declaration of Trust or By-laws, the designation as Chair does not impose on such Independent Fund Trustee any duties, obligations or liability that is greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as a member of the Board, generally.

As described below, the Board has an established committee structure through which the Board considers and addresses important matters involving the Fund, including those identified as presenting conflicts or potential conflicts of interest for management. The Independent Fund Trustees also regularly meet outside the presence of management and are advised by experienced independent legal counsel knowledgeable in matters of investment company regulation. The Board periodically evaluates its structure and composition as well as various aspects of its operations. The Board believes that its leadership structure, including its Independent Chair and its committee structure, is appropriate in light of, among other factors, the asset size of the fund complex overseen by the Board, the nature and number of funds overseen by the Board, the number of Fund Trustees, the range of experience represented on the Board, and the Board’s responsibilities.

Additional Information About Trustees

In choosing each Trustee to serve, the Board was generally aware of each Fund Trustee’s skills, experience, judgment, analytical ability, intelligence, common sense, previous profit and not-for-profit board membership and, for each Independent Fund Trustee, their demonstrated willingness to take an independent and questioning stance toward management. Each Fund Trustee also now has considerable familiarity with the Trust and each fund of the Trust, their investment manager, subadvisers, administrator and distributor, and their operations, as well as the special regulatory requirements governing regulated investment companies and the special responsibilities of investment company directors as a result of his or her substantial prior service as a trustee of the Trust. No particular qualification, experience or background establishes the basis for any Fund Trustee’s position on the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee and individual Board members may have attributed different weights to the various factors.

In addition to the information set forth in the table above and other relevant qualifications, experience, attributes or skills applicable to a particular Fund Trustee, the following provides further information about the qualifications and experience of each Fund Trustee.

Independent Fund Trustees

Faith Colish : Ms. Colish has ex perience as an attorney practicing securities law with the SEC and in private practice, with a focus on broker-dealer and investment management matters and matters of regulatory compliance under the securities laws. She has also served as in-house counsel to an investment advisory firm that managed mutual funds and a fund industry trade organization. She has served as a member of the board of a not-for-profit membership corporation involving oversight of a substantial investment program. She has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years.

Martha C. Goss : Ms. Goss has experience as chief operating and financial officer of an insurance holding company. She has experience as an investment professional, head of an investment unit and treasurer for a major insurance company, experience as the Chief Financial Officer of two consulting firms, and experience as a lending officer and credit analyst at a major bank. She has experience managing a personal investment vehicle. She has served as a member of the boards of various profit and not-for-profit organizations and a university. She has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years.

Michael M. Knetter : Dr. Knetter has organizational management experience as a dean of a major university business school and as President and CEO of a university supporting foundation. He also has responsibility for overseeing management of the university’s endowment. He has academic experience as a professor of international economics. He has served as a member of the boards of various public companies and another mutual fund. He has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years.

Howard A. Mileaf : Mr. Mileaf is a CPA and an attorney with experience in senior management and as general counsel of an industrial corporation and an industrial holding company. He has accounting and management experience at a major accounting firm. He has served as a member of the boards of various profit and not-for-profit organizations. He has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years.

George W. Morriss : Mr. Morriss has experience in senior management and as chief financial officer of a financial services company. He has investment management experience as a portfolio manager managing personal and institutional funds. He has served as a member of a committee of representatives from companies listed on NASDAQ. He has served as a member of the board of funds of hedge funds. He has an advanced degree in finance. He has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years.

Tom D. Seip : Mr. Seip has experience in senior management and as chief executive officer and director of a financial services company overseeing other mutual funds and brokerage. He has experience as director of an asset management company. He has experience in management of a private investment partnership. He has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years and as Independent Chair and/or Lead Independent Trustee of the Board.

Candace L. Straight : Ms. Straight has experience as a private investor and consultant in the insurance industry. She has experience in senior management of a global private equity investment firm. She has served as a member of the boards of a public university and various

profit companies. She has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years.

Peter P. Trapp : Mr. Trapp has experience in senior management of a credit company and several insurance companies. He has served as a member of the board of other mutual funds. He has served as a Fund Trustee for multiple years.

Fund Trustees who are “Interested Persons”

Joseph V. Amato : Mr. Amato has investment management experience as an executive with Neuberger Berman and another financial services firm. He serves as Neuberger Berman’s Chief Investment Officer for equity investments. He has experience in leadership roles within Neuberger Berman and its affiliated entities. He has served as a member of the board of a major university business school. He has served as a Fund Trustee since 2009.

Robert Conti : Mr. Conti has investment management experience as an executive with Neuberger Berman. He has experience in leadership roles within Neuberger Berman and its affiliated entities. He has served as a member of the board of a not-for-profit organization. He has served as a Fund Trustee since 2008.

Information About Committees

The Board has established several standing committees to oversee particular aspects of the Fund’s management. The standing committees of the Board are described below.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s purposes are: (a) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Fund and, as the Committee deems appropriate, to inquire into the internal control over financial reporting of service providers; (b) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee the quality and integrity of the Fund’s financial statements and the independent audit thereof; (c) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee, or, as appropriate, assist Board oversight of, the Fund’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that relate to the Fund’s accounting and financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and independent audits; (d) to approve prior to appointment the engagement of the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm and, in connection therewith, to review and evaluate the qualifications, independence and performance of the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm; (e) to act as a liaison between the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm and the full Board; (f) to monitor the operation of policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each portfolio holding is valued in an appropriate and timely

manner, reflecting information known to management about the issuer, current market conditions, and other material factors (“Pricing Procedures”); (g) to consider and evaluate, and recommend to the Board when the Committee deems it appropriate, amendments to the Pricing Procedures proposed by management, counsel, the auditors and others; and (h) from time to time, as required or permitted by the Pricing Procedures, to establish or ratify a method of determining the fair value of portfolio securities for which market prices are not readily available. Its members are Martha C. Goss (Vice Chair), Howard A. Mileaf, George W. Morriss (Chair), Candace L. Straight, and Peter P. Trapp. All members are Independent Fund Trustees. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, the Committee met five times.

Contract Review Committee. The Contract Review Committee is responsible for overseeing and guiding the process by which the Independent Fund Trustees annually consider whether to renew the Trust’s principal contractual arrangements and Rule 12b-1 plans. The Committee also generally oversees the program by which the manager seeks to monitor and improve the quality of execution for portfolio transactions. Its members are Faith Colish, Martha C. Goss (Vice Chair), and Candace L. Straight (Chair). All members are Independent Fund Trustees. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, the Committee met four times.

Ethics and Compliance Committee. The Ethics and Compliance Committee generally oversees: (a) the Trust’s program for compliance with Rule 38a-1 and the Trust’s implementation and enforcement of its compliance policies and procedures; (b) the compliance with the Trust’s Code of Ethics, which restricts the personal securities transactions, including transactions in Fund shares, of employees, officers, and trustees; (c) the activities of the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”); (d) the activities of management personnel responsible for identifying, prioritizing, and managing operational risk; and (e) the adequacy and fairness of the arrangements for securities lending, if any, in a manner consistent with applicable regulatory requirements, with special emphasis on any arrangements in which the Fund deals with the manager or any affiliate of the manager as principal or agent. The Committee shall not assume oversight duties to the extent that such duties have been assigned by the Board expressly to another Committee of the Board (such as oversight of internal controls over financial reporting, which has been assigned to the Audit Committee.) The Committee’s primary function is oversight. Each investment adviser, subadviser, principal underwriter, administrator and transfer agent (collectively, “Service Providers”) is responsible for its own compliance with the federal securities laws and for devising, implementing, maintaining and updating appropriate policies, procedures and codes of ethics to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The CCO is responsible for administering the Fund’s Compliance Program, including devising and implementing appropriate methods of testing compliance by the Fund and its Service Providers. Its members are Faith Colish (Chair), Michael M. Knetter, and Tom D. Seip. All members are Independent Fund Trustees. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, the Committee met four times. The entire Board will receive at least annually a report on the compliance programs of the Trust and service providers and the required annual reports on the administration of the Code of Ethics and the required annual certifications from the Trust, NB Management, NBAIM and each Subadviser.

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is responsible for acting in an emergency when a quorum of the Board of Trustees is not available; the Committee has all the powers of the Board of Trustees when the Board is not in session to the extent permitted by

Delaware law. Its members are Faith Colish, Robert Conti (Vice Chair), Michael M. Knetter, George W. Morriss, Tom D. Seip (Chair), Candace L. Straight, and Peter P. Trapp. All members except for Mr. Conti are Independent Fund Trustees. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, the Committee did not meet.

Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for: (a) considering and evaluating the structure, composition and operation of the Board of Trustees and each committee thereof, including the operation of the annual self-evaluation by the Board; (b) evaluating and nominating individuals to serve as Fund Trustees including as Independent Fund Trustees, as members of committees, as Chair of the Board and as officers of the Trust; and (c) considering and making recommendations relating to the compensation of Independent Fund Trustees and of those officers (except the CCO) as to whom the Board is charged with approving compensation. Its members are Michael M. Knetter (Chair), Howard A. Mileaf (Vice Chair), and Tom D. Seip. All members are Independent Fund Trustees. The selection and nomination of candidates to serve as independent trustees is committed to the discretion of the current Independent Fund Trustees. The Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders; shareholders may send resumes of recommended persons to the attention of Claudia A. Brandon, Secretary, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds, 605 Third Avenue, 2 nd Floor, New York, NY, 10158-0180. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, the Committee met four times.

Investment Performance Committee. The Investment Performance Committee is responsible for overseeing and guiding the process by which the Board reviews Fund performance and interfacing with management personnel responsible for investment risk management. Each Fund Trustee is a member of the Committee. Peter P. Trapp is the Vice Chair of the Committee. All members except for Mr. Amato and Mr. Conti are Independent Fund Trustees. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, the Committee met three times.

The Portfolio Transactions and Pricing Committee was eliminated in February 2013 and its functions were divided among the Audit Committee, the Contract Review Committee, and the Ethics and Compliance Committee. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, the Committee met once.

Risk Management Oversight

As an integral part of its responsibility for oversight of the Fund in the interests of shareholders, the Board oversees risk management of the Fund’s administration and operations. The Board views risk management as an important responsibility of management.

The Fund faces a number of risks, such as investment risk, counterparty risk, valuation risk, reputational risk, risk of operational failure or lack of business continuity, and legal, compliance and regulatory risk. Risk management seeks to identify and address risks, i.e., events or circumstances that could have material adverse effects on the business, operations, shareholder services, investment performance or reputation of the Fund. Under the overall supervision of the Board, the Fund, the Fund’s investment manager, the Fund’s affiliated subadviser and the affiliates of the investment manager or other service providers to the Fund,

employ a variety of processes, procedures and controls to identify various of those possible events or circumstances, to lessen the probability of their occurrence and/or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur. Different processes, procedures and controls are employed with respect to different types of risks. In addition, under the overall supervision of the Board, the Fund’s investment manager is responsible for management of unaffiliated subadvisers, including risk management. The appropriate Board committees have pursued with management how it will manage the risks inherent in the multi-manager structure and how it will evaluate and oversee the risk management processes of each subadviser.

The Board exercises oversight of the investment manager’s risk management processes primarily through the Board’s committee structure. The various committees, as appropriate, and, at times, the Board, meet periodically with the investment manager’s head of investment risk, head of operational risk, the Chief Compliance Officer, the Treasurer, the Chief Investment Officers for equity and for fixed income, the heads of Internal Audit, and the Fund’s independent auditor. The committees review with these individuals, among other things, the design and implementation of risk management strategies in their respective areas, and events and circumstances that have arisen and responses thereto.

The Board recognizes that not all risks that may affect the Fund can be identified, that it may not be practical or cost-effective to eliminate or mitigate certain risks, that it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment-related risks) to achieve the Fund’s goals, and that the processes, procedures and controls employed to address certain risks may be limited in their effectiveness. Moreover, reports received by the Fund Trustees as to risk management matters are typically summaries of the relevant information. Furthermore, it is in the very nature of certain risks that they can be evaluated only as probabilities, and not as certainties. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, the Board’s risk management oversight is subject to substantial limitations, and no risk management program can predict the likelihood or seriousness of, or mitigate the effects of, all potential risks.

Compensation and Indemnification

The Trust’s Trust Instrument provides that the Trust will indemnify its Fund Trustees and officers against liabilities and expenses reasonably incurred in connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with the Trust, unless it is adjudicated that they (a) engaged in bad faith, willful misfeasance, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of their offices, or (b) did not act in good faith in the reasonable belief that their action was in the best interest of the Trust. In the case of settlement, such indemnification will not be provided unless it has been determined (by a court or other body approving the settlement or other disposition, by a majority of disinterested trustees based upon a review of readily available facts, or in a written opinion of independent counsel) that such officers or Fund Trustees have not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of their duties.

Officers and Fund Trustees who are interested persons of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no salary or fees from the Trust.

For serving as a trustee of the Neuberger Berman Funds, each Independent Fund Trustee

and each Interested Director who is not an employee of NB Management or its affiliates receives an annual retainer of $125,000, paid quarterly, and a fee of $12,500 for each of the four regularly scheduled meetings he or she attends in-person or by telephone. For any additional special in-person or telephonic meeting of the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee will determine whether a fee is warranted. To compensate for the additional time commitment, the Chair of each Committee receives $12,500 per year. No additional compensation is provided for service on a Board committee. The Chair who is also an Independent Fund Trustee receives an additional $45,000 per year.

The Neuberger Berman Funds reimburse Independent Fund Trustees for their travel and other out-of-pocket expenses related to attendance at Board meetings. The Independent Fund Trustee compensation is allocated to each fund in the fund family based on a method the Board of Trustees finds reasonable.

An Independent Fund Trustee who retired before July 1, 2012 was eligible to elect Trustee Emeritus status upon his or her retirement if he or she had served for a minimum of 15 years or reached the age of 70 years at his or her last birthday. This policy provides a means to retain access to the valuable experience and substantial institutional knowledge of, and certain ongoing services from, Independent Fund Trustees who have retired from the Board. A Trustee Emeritus receives a payment for a period of three years according to the following schedule: for the first year, an amount equal to three-fourths of the annual retainer and regular meeting fees in effect at the time of his or her retirement (“Compensation at Retirement”) assuming six regular meetings; for the second year, an amount equal to one-half of the Compensation at Retirement; and for the third year, an amount equal to one-fourth of the Compensation at Retirement. A Trustee Emeritus may attend Board or Committee meetings and will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses related to such attendance. The Trustee Emeritus compensation is allocated to each fund in the fund family based on a method the Board of Trustees finds reasonable. To continue serving as a Trustee Emeritus, an individual must continue to qualify as “independent” for purposes of the 1940 Act, and shall continue to be subject to the restrictions of the Code of Ethics and requirements under the Board governance policies to pre-clear any trades in shares of a closed end fund in the fund family (or derivatives relating to the shares). A Trustee Emeritus does not have the power to vote but may be consulted regarding matters involving the Fund.

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the Fund Trustees. The Trust does not have any retirement plan for the Fund Trustees.

TABLE OF COMPENSATION

FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED 10/31/2012

Name and Position with the Trust	Aggregate Compensation from the Trust	Total Compensation from Investment Companies in the Neuberger Berman Fund Complex Paid to Fund Trustees
Independent Fund Trustees
John Cannon* Trustee	$6,048	$135,978
Faith Colish Trustee	$7,441	$160,000
Martha C. Goss Trustee	$6,989	$150,000
C. Anne Harvey** Trustee	$6,989	$150,000
Robert A. Kavesh* Trustee	$6,040	$135,625
Michael M. Knetter Trustee	$7,441	$160,000
Howard A. Mileaf Trustee	$7,433	$159,647
George W. Morriss Trustee	$7,441	$160,000
Edward I. O’Brien* Trustee	$6,040	$135,625
Cornelius T. Ryan* Trustee	$6,040	$135,625
Tom D. Seip Chairman of the Board and Trustee	$8,571	$185,000
Candace L. Straight Trustee	$7,441	$160,000
Peter P. Trapp Trustee	$7,893	$170,000
Fund Trustees who are “Interested Persons”
Joseph V. Amato Trustee	$0	$0
Robert Conti President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee	$0	$0
Jack L. Rivkin*** Trustee	$7,441	$160,000

* Retired as of June 30, 2012 and elected Trustee Emeritus status as of that date.

** Retired as of December 13, 2012.

*** Resigned as of December 16, 2013.

On January 31, 2013, the Fund Trustees and officers of the Trust, as a group, owned beneficially or of record less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each Class of the Fund.

Ownership of Securities by Fund Trustees

The following table sets forth the dollar range of securities owned by each Fund Trustee as of December 31, 2012.*

Name of Fund Trustee	Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund
Independent Fund Trustees
Faith Colish	B
Martha C. Goss	A
Michael M. Knetter	A
Howard A. Mileaf	A
George W. Morriss	A
Tom D. Seip	A
Candace L. Straight	A
Peter P. Trapp	A
Fund Trustees who are “Interested Persons”
Joseph V. Amato	A
Robert Conti	A

* Valuation as of December 31, 2012.

A = None B = $1-$10,000 C = $10,001 - $50,000 D = $50,001-$100,000 E = over $100,000

The following table sets forth the aggregate dollar range of securities owned by each Fund Trustee in all the funds in the fund family overseen by the Fund Trustee as of December 31, 2012.

Name of Fund Trustee	Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities Held in all Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Fund Trustee in Family of Investment Companies*
Independent Fund Trustees
Faith Colish	E
Martha C. Goss	E
Michael M. Knetter	E
Howard A. Mileaf	E
George W. Morriss	E
Tom D. Seip	E
Candace L. Straight	E
Peter P. Trapp	E
Fund Trustees who are “Interested Persons”
Joseph V. Amato	E
Robert Conti	E

* Valuation as of December 31, 2012.

A = None B = $1-$10,000 C = $10,001 - $50,000 D = $50,001-$100,000 E = over $100,000

Independent Fund Trustees Ownership of Securities

No Independent Fund Trustee (including his/her immediate family members) owns any securities (not including shares of registered investment companies) in any Neuberger Berman entity.

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES

Investment Manager and Administrator

NB Management serves as the investment manager to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement with the Trust, dated December 29, 2010 (“Management Agreement”).

The Management Agreement provides, in substance, that NB Management will make and implement investment decisions for the Fund in its discretion and will continuously develop an investment program for the Fund’s assets. The Management Agreement permits NB Management to effect securities transactions on behalf of the Fund through associated persons of NB Management. The Management Agreement also specifically permits NB Management to compensate, through higher commissions, brokers and dealers who provide investment research and analysis to the Fund.

NB Management provides to the Fund, without separate cost, office space, equipment, and facilities and the personnel necessary to perform executive, administrative, and clerical

functions. NB Management pays all salaries, expenses, and fees of the officers, trustees, and employees of the Trust who are officers, directors, or employees of NB Management. Two directors of NB Management, who also serve as officers of NB Management, presently serve as Fund Trustees and/or officers of the Trust. See “Trustees and Officers.” The Fund pays NB Management a management fee based on the Fund’s average daily net assets, as described below.

NB Management provides facilities, services, and personnel as well as accounting, record keeping and other services to the Fund pursuant to three administration agreements with the Trust, one for Institutional Class dated December 29, 2010, one for Class A dated December 29, 2010 and one for Class C dated December 29, 2010 (each, an “Administration Agreement”). For such administrative services, each Class of the Fund pays NB Management a fee based on the Class’s average daily net assets, as described below.

NB Management engages NBAIM as investment adviser to choose the Fund’s investments and handle its day-to-day business, including the oversight of the Subadvisers’ investment activities. See “Adviser and Subadvisers” below.

Under each Administration Agreement, NB Management also provides to each Class and its shareholders certain shareholder, shareholder-related, and other services that are not furnished by the Fund’s shareholder servicing agent or third party investment providers. NB Management provides the direct shareholder services specified in the Administration Agreements and assists the shareholder servicing agent or third party investment providers in the development and implementation of specified programs and systems to enhance overall shareholder servicing capabilities. NB Management or the third party investment provider solicits and gathers shareholder proxies, performs services connected with the qualification of the Fund’s shares for sale in various states, and furnishes other services the parties agree from time to time should be provided under the Administration Agreements.

The Management Agreement continues until October 31, 2014. The Management Agreement is renewable thereafter from year to year with respect to the Fund, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Independent Fund Trustees, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Fund Trustees or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding shares in the Fund. Each Administration Agreement continues until October 31, 2013. Each Administration Agreement is renewable thereafter from year to year with respect to the Fund, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Independent Fund Trustees, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Fund Trustees or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding shares in the Fund.

The Management Agreement is terminable, without penalty, with respect to the Fund on 60 days’ written notice either by the Trust or by NB Management. Each Administration Agreement is terminable, without penalty, with respect to the Fund on 60 days’ written notice either by the Trust or by NB Management. Each Agreement terminates automatically if it is assigned.

From time to time, NB Management or the Fund may enter into arrangements with registered broker-dealers or other third parties pursuant to which it pays the broker-dealer or third party a per account fee or a fee based on a percentage of the aggregate net asset value of Fund shares purchased by the broker-dealer or third party on behalf of its customers, in payment for administrative and other services rendered to such customers.

Third parties may be subject to federal or state laws that limit their ability to provide certain administrative or distribution related services. NB Management and the Fund intend to contract with third parties for only those services they may legally provide. If, due to a change in laws governing those third parties or in the interpretation of any such law, a third party is prohibited from performing some or all of the above-described services, NB Management or the Fund may be required to find alternative means of providing those services. Any such change is not expected to impact the Fund or its shareholders adversely.

Management and Administration Fees

Effective February 28, 2013, for investment management services, the Fund pays NB Management a fee at the annual rate of 1.700% of the first $250 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, 1.675% of the next $250 million, 1.650% of the next $250 million, 1.625% of the next $250 million, 1.600% of the next $500 million, 1.575% of the next $2.5 billion, and 1.550% of average daily net assets in excess of $4 billion. For investment management services, prior to February 28, 2013, the Fund paid NB Management a fee at the annual rate of 2.000% of the first $250 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, 1.975% of the next $250 million, 1.950% of the next $250 million, 1.925% of the next $250 million, 1.900% of the next $500 million, 1.875% of the next $2.5 billion, and 1.850% of average daily net assets in excess of $4 billion.

For administrative services, the Institutional Class of the Fund pays NB Management a fee at the annual rate of 0.15% of the Class’s average daily net assets, plus certain out-of-pocket expenses for technology used for shareholder servicing and shareholder communications, subject to the prior approval of an annual budget by the Fund Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Fund Trustees, and periodic reports to the Fund Trustees on actual expenses. With the Fund’s consent NB Management may subcontract to third parties, including investment providers, some of its responsibilities to the Fund under the Administration Agreement and may compensate each such third party that provides such services. In addition, the Fund may compensate third parties, including investment providers, for recordkeeping, accounting and other services.

For administrative services, Class A and Class C of the Fund each pays NB Management a fee at the annual rate of 0.26% of that Class’s average daily net assets, plus certain out-of-pocket expenses for technology used for shareholder servicing and shareholder communications, subject to the prior approval of an annual budget by the Fund Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Fund Trustees, and periodic reports to the Fund Trustees on actual expenses. With the Fund’s consent, NB Management may subcontract to third parties, including investment providers, some of its responsibilities to the Fund under the Administration Agreement and may compensate each such third party that provides such services. (A portion of this compensation

may be derived from the Rule 12b-1 fee paid to NB Management by Class A and Class C of the Fund; see “Distribution Arrangements,” below.)

For administrative services, Class R6 of each Fund pays NB Management a fee at the annual rate of 0.08% of the Class’s average daily net assets, plus certain out-of-pocket expenses for technology used for shareholder servicing and shareholder communications, subject to the prior approval of an annual budget by the Fund Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Fund Trustees, and periodic reports to the Board of Trustees on actual expenses.

During the fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, the Fund accrued management and administration fees as follows:

	Management and Administration Fees Accrued for Fiscal Period Ended October 31,
Class	2012
Class A	$6,810*
Class C	$858*
Institutional	$222,048*

* Fiscal period from May 15, 2012 (commencement of operations of each Class of the Fund) to October 31, 2012.

Class R6 commenced operations on December 31, 2013. Therefore, there is no data to report.

Fund Accounting Agent

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPM”), One Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, acts as fund accounting agent to the Fund pursuant to a fund accounting services agreement, which includes, among other things, the preparation and maintenance of accounting records and the calculation of NAV.

Contractual Expense Limitations

NB Management has contractually undertaken, during the respective period noted below, to waive current payment of fees and/or reimburse annual operating expenses of each Class of the Fund so that its total operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, dividend and interest expenses relating to short sales, acquired fund fees and expenses, and extraordinary expenses, if any) (“Operating Expenses”) do not exceed the rate per annum noted below (“Expense Limitation”).

The Fund has agreed to repay NB Management out of assets attributable to its respective Class noted below for any fees waived by NB Management under the Expense Limitation or any Operating Expenses NB Management reimburses in excess of the Expense Limitation, provided the repayments do not cause that Class’ Operating Expenses to exceed the respective annual rate of average daily net assets as noted below and the repayments are made within three years after the year in which NB Management incurred the expense.

The appropriateness of these undertakings is determined on a Class-by-Class basis.

Fund	Class	Limitation Period	Expense Limitation
Absolute Return Multi-Manager	Institutional	10/31/2016	1.97%*
	A	10/31/2016	2.33%*
	C	10/31/2016	3.08%*
	R6	10/31/2016	1.90%

*Prior to February 28, 2013, the Expense Limitations for Class A, Class C, and Institutional Class were 2.81%, 3.56%, and 2.45%, respectively.

NB Management reimbursed each Class of the Fund the following amount of expenses pursuant to the Fund’s contractual arrangement:

Expenses Reimbursed for Fiscal Period Ended October 31,
Class	2012*
Class A	$24,960
Class C	$4,503
Institutional Class	$816,372

* Fiscal period from May 15, 2012 (commencement of operations of each Class of the Fund) to October 31, 2012.

Voluntary Expense Limitations

In addition, from January 2, 2013 to February 27, 2013, NB Management had voluntarily undertaken to waive current payment of fees and/or reimburse certain expenses of Class A, Class C and Institutional Class of the Fund so that the total annual operating expenses of each class were limited to 2.33%, 3.08% and 1.97% of average net assets, respectively.

Adviser and Subadvisers

NB Management retains NBAIM, 605 Third Avenue 22 nd Floor, New York, NY 10158, as investment adviser with respect to the Fund pursuant to an advisory agreement dated May 15, 2012 (“Advisory Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, NB Management has delegated responsibility for the Fund’s day-to-day management to NBAIM. The Advisory Agreement provides in substance that NBAIM will select and monitor the Subadvisers, make and implement investment decisions for the Fund in its discretion and will continuously develop an investment program for the Fund’s assets. The Advisory Agreement permits NBAIM to effect securities transactions on behalf of the Fund through associated persons of NBAIM. The Advisory Agreement also specifically permits NBAIM to compensate, through higher commissions, brokers and dealers who provide investment research and analysis to the Fund, although NBAIM has no current plans to pay a material amount of such compensation.

The Advisory Agreement continues until October 31, 2014 and is renewable from year to year, subject to approval of its continuance in the same manner as the Management Agreement. The Advisory Agreement is subject to termination, without penalty, with respect to the Fund by the Fund Trustees or a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding interests in the Fund, by NB Management, or by NBAIM on not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior written notice. The Advisory Agreement also terminates automatically with respect to the Fund if it is assigned or if the Management Agreement terminates with respect to the Fund.

NB Management and NBAIM retain the following Subadvisers with respect to the Fund pursuant to separate subadvisory agreements with each Subadviser (“Subadvisory Agreements”). The fee paid to each Subadviser by NB Management is governed by its respective Subadvisory Agreement. Information relating to individual Subadvisers has been provided by that Subadviser.

Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC (“Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn”) located at 520 Madison Avenue, 20 th Floor, New York, NY 10022, manages the assets allocated to the global long/short equity strategy. Wilmington Trust Investments, Inc. has a controlling interest in Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn.

GAMCO Asset Management Inc. (“Gabelli”) located at One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580, manages the assets allocated to the merger arbitrage strategy. Gabelli is a subsidiary of GAMCO Investors, Inc., which is indirectly majority owned by Mario J. Gabelli.

Lazard Asset Management LLC (“Lazard”), located at 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112, manages assets allocated to the global equity long/short strategy. Lazard is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lazard Freres & Co., LLC.

Levin Capital Strategies, LP (“Levin Capital Strategies”) located at 595 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10022, manages the assets allocated to the event driven strategy. John A. Levin, through his General Partnership interest, controls Levin Capital Strategies, LP.

Loeb Arbitrage Management LP (“Loeb”), located at 61 Broadway, New York, NY 10006, manages assets allocated to the event driven strategy. Loeb is a registered investment adviser providing asset management services since 1985. Loeb is wholly owned by Gideon King and Loeb Holding Corporation.

MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields”) located at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 43 rd Floor, New York, NY 10105, manages the assets allocated to the long/short high yield fixed income strategy. MacKay Shields is 100% owned by New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC, which is wholly owned by New York Life Insurance Company, our ultimate parent.

Sound Point Capital Management, L.P. (“Sound Point Capital”) located at 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 36 th Floor, New York, NY 10036 manages the assets allocated to the distressed

and event driven credit strategy. Sound Point Capital is wholly owned by Stephen Ketchum and Ellipse Holdings LLC.

Turner Investments, L.P. (“Turner Investments”) located at 1205 Westlakes Drive, Suite 100, Berwyn, Pa 19312, manages the assets allocated to the long/short healthcare strategy. Turner Investments is an independent, 100% employee-owned firm, with Robert E. Turner, chairman and chief investment officer, as its majority and controlling shareholder.

Visium Asset Management, LP (“Visium Asset Management”) located at 888 Seventh Avenue, Floor 22, New York, NY 10019 manages the assets allocated to the event driven strategy. Visium Asset Management is controlled by JG Asset, LLC. Jacob Gottlieb owns 95% of the limited partnership interests in the Visium Asset Management. Jacob Gottlieb is the managing member of JG Asset, LLC; he owns 95% of the ownership interests of this entity.

Pursuant to the Subadvisory Agreements, the Subadvisers have been delegated responsibility for the day-to-day management of the assets of the Fund allocated to such Subadviser. Each Subadvisory Agreement provides in substance that the Subadviser will make and implement investment decisions for the Fund in its discretion and will continuously develop an investment program for the Fund’s assets allocated to such Subadviser. The Subadvisory Agreements permit each Subadviser to effect securities transactions on behalf of the Fund through associated persons of the Subadviser. The Subadvisory Agreements also specifically permit the Subadvisers to compensate, through higher commissions, brokers and dealers who provide investment research and analysis to the Fund, although the Subadvisers have no current plans to pay a material amount of such compensation.

Each Subadvisory Agreement continues with respect to the Fund until October 31, 2014, and is renewable from year to year thereafter, subject to approval of its continuance in the same manner as the Management Agreement. Each Subadvisory Agreement is subject to termination, without penalty, with respect to the Fund by the Trustees, or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding shares of the Fund, by NB Management or by NBAIM on not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior written notice to the Fund. A Subadviser is permitted to terminate its Subadvisory Agreement on either 60 days' or 120 days' prior written notice to the Fund, NB Management, and NBAIM. Each Subadvisory Agreement also terminates automatically with respect to the Fund if it is assigned or if the Management Agreement terminates with respect to the Fund.

During the fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of subadvisory fees paid to the Subadvisers was $106,740.

Portfolio Manager Information

The table below lists the Portfolio Managers of the Fund.

Portfolio Manager	Fund Managed
Eric Weinstein	Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund
Jeff Majit	Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Fred Ingham	Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund
David Kupperman	Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund
Ian Haas	Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund

Accounts Managed

The table below describes the accounts for which the Portfolio Managers have day-to-day management responsibility as of December 31, 2012.

Type of Account	Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets Managed ($ millions)	Number of Accounts Managed for which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based	Assets Managed for which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based ($ millions)
Eric Weinstein
Registered Investment Companies*	0	0	0	0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	26	1,586	20	1,581
Other Accounts**	4	1,078	1	558
Jeff Majit
Registered Investment Companies*	0	0	0	0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	26	1,586	20	1,581
Other Accounts**	4	1,078	1	558
Fred Ingham
Registered Investment Companies*	0	0	0	0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	26	1,586	20	1,581
Other Accounts**	4	1,078	1	558
David Kupperman
Registered Investment Companies*	0	0	0	0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	0	0	0
Other Accounts**	0	0	0	0
Ian Hass
Registered Investment Companies*	0	0	0	0

Type of Account	Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets Managed ($ millions)	Number of Accounts Managed for which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based	Assets Managed for which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based ($ millions)
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	26	1,586	20	1,581
Other Accounts**	4	1,078	1	558

*Registered Investment Companies include all mutual funds managed by the Portfolio Manager, including the Fund.

**Other Accounts include: Institutional Separate Accounts, Subadvised funds, and Managed Accounts (WRAP).

Conflicts of Interest

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a Portfolio Manager of NB Management, NBAIM or a Subadviser has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one Fund or other account. The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to actual or potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different or similar objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees, as the Portfolio Manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. The Portfolio Manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Fund, and which may include transactions that are directly contrary to the positions taken by the Fund. For example, a Portfolio Manager may engage in short sales of securities for another account that are the same type of securities in which the Fund it manages also invests. In such a case, the Portfolio Manager could be seen as harming the performance of the Fund for the benefit of the account engaging in short sales if the short sales cause the market value of the securities to fall. Additionally, if a Portfolio Manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than one fund or other account, the Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity. If one account were to buy or sell portfolio securities shortly before another account bought or sold the same securities, it could affect the price paid or received by the second account. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform the securities selected for the Fund. Finally, a conflict of interest may arise if the Manager and a Portfolio Manager have a financial incentive to favor one account over another, such as a performance-based management fee that applies to one account but not the funds or accounts for which the Portfolio Manager is responsible.

NB Management, NBAIM, each of the Subadvisers and the Fund have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Each Subadviser may manage other accounts that have similar investment objectives or strategies, including some that have performance-based fees. Portfolio managers of each of the Subadvisers who manage other investment accounts, including in some instances proprietary or personal accounts, in addition to the Fund may be presented with the potential conflicts.

Any material conflicts of interest which may arise in connection with a Subadviser’s management of the Fund’s investments and the management of the investments of other accounts

are addressed primarily through each Subadviser’s allocation policies. The Subadvisers attempt to allocate portfolio transactions equitably whenever concurrent decisions are made to purchase or sell securities for a Fund and another advisory account.

Compensation of Portfolio Managers by NB Management and NBAIM

Our compensation philosophy is one that focuses on rewarding performance and incentivizing our employees. We are also focused on creating a compensation process that we believe is fair, transparent, and competitive with the market.

Compensation for Portfolio Managers consists of fixed and variable compensation but is more heavily weighted on the variable portion of total compensation and reflects individual performance, overall contribution to the team, collaboration with colleagues across Neuberger Berman Group LLC (“NBG,” and together with its consolidated subsidiaries “NB Group”) and, most importantly, overall investment performance. In particular, the bonus for a Portfolio Manager is determined by using a formula and may or may not contain a discretionary component. If applicable, the discretionary component is determined on the basis of a variety of criteria, including investment performance (including the pre-tax three-year track record in order to emphasize long-term performance and in certain instances the one-year and five-year track records), utilization of central resources (including research, sales and operations/support), business building to further the longer term sustainable success of the investment team, effective team/people management, and overall contribution to the success of NB Group. In addition, compensation of portfolio managers at other comparable firms is considered, with an eye toward remaining competitive with the market.

The terms of our long-term retention incentives are as follows:

Employee-Owned Equity. An integral part of the Acquisition (the management buyout of Neuberger Berman in 2009) was implementing an equity ownership structure which embodies the importance of incentivizing and retaining key investment professionals.

Most of the senior Portfolio Managers on the mutual fund teams are key shareholders in the equity ownership structure. Currently, on a yearly basis, the equity ownership allocations will be re-evaluated and re-allocated based on performance and other key metrics. employee equity and preferred stock is subject to vesting and other terms and conditions.

Contingent Compensation Plan. We have also established the Neuberger Berman Group Contingent Compensation Plan (“Contingent Compensation Plan”) pursuant to which a certain percentage of a Portfolio Manager’s compensation is deemed contingent and vests over a three-year period. Under the plan, participating Portfolio Managers and other participating employees who are members of mutual fund investment teams will receive a cash return on their contingent compensation with a portion of such return being determined based on the team’s investment performance, as well as the performance of a portfolio of other investment funds managed by NB Group investment professionals.

Restrictive Covenants. Portfolio Managers who have received equity interests have agreed to certain restrictive covenants, which impose obligations and restrictions on the use of

confidential information and the solicitation of Neuberger Berman employees and clients over a specified period of time if the Portfolio Manager leaves the firm.

Other Accounts. Certain Portfolio Managers may manage products other than mutual funds, such as high net worth separate accounts. For the management of these accounts, a Portfolio Manager may generally receive a percentage of pre-tax revenue determined on a monthly basis less certain deductions (e.g., a “finder’s fee” or “referral fee” paid to a third party). The percentage of revenue a Portfolio Manager receives will vary based on certain revenue thresholds.

Ownership of Securities

Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each Portfolio Manager in the Fund as of October 31, 2012. Beneficial ownership includes a Portfolio Manager's direct investments, including through 401(k) plans; investments by immediate family members; and amounts invested through contingent compensation plans.

Portfolio Manager	Dollar Range of Equity Securities Owned in the Fund
Eric Weinstein	F
Jeff Majit	E
Fred Ingham	E
David Kupperman	E
Ian Haas	C

A = None		E = $100,001-$500,000
B = $1-$10,000		F = $500,001-$1,000,000
C = $10,001 - $50,000		G = Over $1,000,001
D =$50,001-$100,000

Other Investment Companies or Accounts Managed

The investment decisions concerning the Fund and the other registered investment companies managed by NB Management and NBAIM (collectively, “Other NB Funds”) have been and will continue to be made independently of one another. In terms of their investment objectives, most of the Other NB Funds differ from the Fund. Even where the investment objectives are similar, however, the methods used by the Other NB Funds and the Fund to achieve their objectives may differ. The investment results achieved by all of the registered investment companies managed by NB Management and NBAIM have varied from one another in the past and are likely to vary in the future.

There may be occasions when the Fund and one or more of the Other NB Funds or other accounts or funds managed by NB Management, NBAIM or a Subadviser, respectively, are

contemporaneously engaged in purchasing or selling the same securities from or to third parties. When this occurs, the transactions may be aggregated to obtain favorable execution to the extent permitted by applicable law and regulations. The transactions will be allocated according to one or more methods designed to ensure that the allocation is equitable to the Fund and accounts involved. Although in some cases this arrangement may have a detrimental effect on the price or volume of the securities as to the Fund, in other cases it is believed that the Fund’s ability to participate in volume transactions may produce better executions for it. In any case, it is the judgment of the Fund Trustees and NB Management that the desirability of the Fund having its advisory arrangements with NB Management, NBAIM or a subadviser outweighs any disadvantages that may result from contemporaneous transactions.

The Fund is subject to certain limitations imposed on all advisory clients of NBAIM or a Subadviser, respectively (including the Fund, the Other NB Funds, and other managed funds or accounts) and personnel of NBAIM or a Subadviser, respectively, and their affiliates. These may include, for example, limits that may be imposed in certain industries or by certain companies, and policies of NB Management, NBAIM or a Subadviser that limit the aggregate purchases, by all accounts under management, of the outstanding shares of public companies.

Codes of Ethics

The Fund, NB Management, NBAIM and each Subadviser have personal securities trading policies that restrict the personal securities transactions of employees, officers, and Fund Trustees. Their primary purpose is to ensure that personal trading by these individuals does not disadvantage any fund that they manage. The Fund’s Portfolio Managers and other investment personnel who comply with the policies’ preclearance and disclosure procedures may be permitted to purchase, sell or hold certain types of securities which also may be or are held in the funds they advise, but are restricted from trading in close conjunction with their funds or taking personal advantage of investment opportunities that may belong to the funds. Text-only versions of each Code of Ethics can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s internet web site at www.sec.gov. You may also review and copy those documents by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 202-942-8090. In addition, copies of the Codes of Ethics may be obtained, after mailing the appropriate duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549-0102 or by e-mail request at publicinfo@sec.gov .

Management and Control of NB Management and NBAIM

NB Management and NBAIM are indirect subsidiaries of NBG. The directors, officers and/or employees of NB Management who are deemed “control persons,” all of whom have offices at the same address as NB Management, are: Joseph Amato and Robert Conti. Mr. Amato is a Trustee of the Trust and Mr. Conti is both a Trustee and an officer of the Trust. The directors, officers and/or employees of NBAIM who are deemed “control persons,” all of whom have offices at the same address as NBAIM, are: Anthony Tutrone and Eric Weinstein.

The majority of NBG’s voting equity is owned by NBSH Acquisition, LLC (“NBSH”), which was formed to facilitate the May 4, 2009 management buyout of certain of the investment

management businesses conducted by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”). NBSH, which is owned by portfolio managers, members of the NB Group management team and certain of NB Group’s key employees and senior professionals, owns approximately 76% of NBG’s common units, and LBHI and certain of its subsidiaries own the remaining 24% of such common units.

DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS

The Fund offers three classes of shares, known as Institutional Class, Class A and Class C shares.

Distributor

NB Management serves as the distributor (“Distributor”) in connection with the continuous offering of the Fund’s shares. Institutional Class and Class R6 shares are offered on a no-load basis. As described in the Fund’s Prospectuses, certain classes are available only through investment providers (“Institutions”) that have made arrangements with NB Management for shareholder servicing and administration and/or entered into selling agreements with NB Management.

In connection with the sale of its shares, the Fund has authorized the Distributor to give only the information, and to make only the statements and representations, contained in the Prospectuses and this SAI or that properly may be included in sales literature and advertisements in accordance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act, and applicable rules of self-regulatory organizations. Sales may be made only by a Prospectus, which may be delivered personally, through the mails, or by electronic means. The Distributor is the Fund’s “principal underwriter” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. It acts as agent in arranging for the sale of the Fund’s Institutional Class and Class R6 shares without sales commission or other compensation and bears all advertising and promotion expenses incurred in the sale of those shares. The Distributor also acts as agent in arranging for the sale of the Fund’s Class A and Class C shares to Institutions and bears all advertising and promotion expenses incurred in the sale of those shares. For Class A shares, the Distributor receives commission revenue consisting of the portion of the Class A sales charge remaining after the allowances by the Distributor to Institutions. For Class C shares, the Distributor receives any contingent deferred sales charges that apply during the first year after purchase. The Fund pays the Distributor for advancing the immediate service fees and commissions paid to qualified Institutions in connection with Class C shares.

Sales charge revenues collected and retained by the Distributor for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2012 are shown in the following table:

Sales Charge Revenue

Deferred Sales Charge Revenue

Fund	Fiscal Period ended Oct. 31,	Amount Paid to Distributor	Amount Retained by Distributor	Amount Paid to Distributor	Amount Retained by Distributor
Absolute Return Multi-Manager – Class A	2012*	$9,955	$1,976	-	-
Absolute Return Multi-Manager – Class C	2012*	-	-	-	-

* Fiscal period from May 15, 2012 (commencement of operations of each Class of the Fund) to October 31, 2012.

For each Class that is sold directly to investors, the Distributor or one of its affiliates may, from time to time, deem it desirable to offer to shareholders of the Fund, through use of its shareholder list, the shares of other mutual funds for which the Distributor acts as distributor or other products or services. Any such use of the Fund’s shareholder lists, however, will be made subject to terms and conditions, if any, approved by a majority of the Independent Fund Trustees. These lists will not be used to offer the Fund’s shareholders any investment products or services other than those managed or distributed by NB Management or NBAIM.

From time to time, NB Management may enter into arrangements pursuant to which it compensates a registered broker-dealer or other third party for services in connection with the distribution of Fund shares.

The Trust, on behalf of the Fund, and the Distributor are parties to a Distribution Agreement with respect to the Fund’s Institutional Class, and Distribution and Shareholder Services Agreements with respect to Class A and Class C of the Fund (“Distribution Agreements”). The Distribution Agreements continue until October 31, 2014. The Distribution Agreements may be renewed annually if specifically approved by (1) the vote of a majority of the Fund Trustees or a 1940 Act majority vote of the Fund’s outstanding shares and (2) the vote of a majority of the Independent Fund Trustees, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Distribution Agreements may be terminated by either party and will terminate automatically on their assignment, in the same manner as the Management Agreement.

Revenue Sharing

NB Management and/or its affiliates may pay additional compensation and/or provide incentives (out of their own resources and not as an expense of the Fund) to certain brokers, dealers, or other financial intermediaries (“Financial Intermediaries”) in connection with the sale, distribution, retention and/or servicing of Fund shares (“revenue sharing payments”). No such payments are made with respect to Class R6.

Such payments are intended to provide additional compensation to Financial Intermediaries for various services, including without limitation, participating in joint advertising with a Financial Intermediary, granting NB Management personnel reasonable access to a

Financial Intermediary’s financial advisers and consultants, and allowing NB Management personnel to attend conferences. NB Management and its affiliates may make other payments or allow other promotional incentives to Financial Intermediaries to the extent permitted by SEC and FINRA rules and by other applicable laws and regulations.

In addition, NB Management may pay for: placing the Fund on the Financial Intermediary’s sales system, preferred or recommended fund list, providing periodic and ongoing education and training of Financial Intermediary personnel regarding the Fund; disseminating to Financial Intermediary personnel information and product marketing materials regarding the Fund; explaining to clients the features and characteristics of the Fund; conducting due diligence regarding the Fund; providing reasonable access to sales meetings, sales representatives and management representatives of a Financial Intermediary; and furnishing marketing support and other services. Additional compensation also may include non-cash compensation, financial assistance to Financial Intermediaries in connection with conferences, seminars for the public and advertising campaigns, technical and systems support and reimbursement of ticket charges (fees that a Financial Intermediary charges its representatives for effecting transactions in Fund shares) and other similar charges.

The level of revenue sharing payments made to Financial Intermediaries may be a fixed fee or based upon one or more of the following factors: reputation in the industry, ability to attract and retain assets, target markets, customer relationships, quality of service, gross sales, current assets and/or number of accounts of the Fund attributable to the Financial Intermediary, the particular Fund or fund type or other measures as agreed to by NB Management and/or their affiliates and the Financial Intermediaries or any combination thereof. The amount of these payments is determined at the discretion of NB Management and/or its affiliates from time to time, may be substantial, and may be different for different Financial Intermediaries based on, for example, the nature of the services provided by the Financial Intermediary.

Receipt of, or the prospect of receiving, this additional compensation, may influence a Financial Intermediary’s recommendation of the Fund or of any particular share class of the Fund. These payment arrangements, however, will not change the price that an investor pays for Fund shares or the amount that the Fund receives to invest on behalf of an investor and will not increase Fund expenses. You should review your Financial Intermediary’s compensation disclosure and/or talk to your Financial Intermediary to obtain more information on how this compensation may have influenced your Financial Intermediary’s recommendation of the Fund.

In addition to the compensation described above, the Fund and/or NB Management may pay fees to Financial Intermediaries and their affiliated persons for maintaining Fund share balances and/or for subaccounting, administrative or transaction processing services related to the maintenance of accounts for retirement and benefit plans and other omnibus accounts (“subaccounting fees”). Such subaccounting fees paid by the Fund may differ depending on the Fund and are designed to be equal to or less than the fees the Fund would pay to its transfer agent for similar services. Because some subaccounting fees are directly related to the number of accounts and assets for which a Financial Intermediary provides services, these fees will increase with the success of the Financial Intermediary’s sales activities.

NB Management and its affiliates are motivated to make the payments described above since they promote the sale of Fund shares and the retention of those investments by clients of Financial Intermediaries. To the extent Financial Intermediaries sell more shares of the Fund or retain shares of the Fund in their clients’ accounts, NB Management and/or its affiliates benefit from the incremental management and other fees paid to NB Management and/or its affiliates by the Fund with respect to those assets.

Distribution Plan (Class A Only)

The Trust, on behalf of the Fund, has also adopted a Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (“Plan”) with respect to Class A of the Fund. The Plan provides that Class A of the Fund will compensate NB Management for administrative and other services provided to Class A of the Fund, its activities and expenses related to the sale and distribution of Class A shares, and ongoing services to investors in Class A of the Fund. Under the Plan, NB Management receives from Class A of the Fund a fee at the annual rate of 0.25% of that Class’s average daily net assets. NB Management may pay up to the full amount of this fee to Institutions that make available Class A shares and/or provide services to Class A and its shareholders. The fee paid to an Institution is based on the level of such services provided. Institutions may use the payments for, among other purposes, compensating employees engaged in sales and/or shareholder servicing. The amount of fees paid by Class A of the Fund during any year may be more or less than the cost of distribution and other services provided to that class of the Fund and its investors. FINRA rules limit the amount of annual distribution and service fees that may be paid by a mutual fund and impose a ceiling on the cumulative distribution fees paid. Class A’s plan complies with these rules.

The table below sets forth the total amount of fees accrued for Class A of the Fund:

	Fiscal Period Ended October 31,
	2012*
Class A	$753

* Fiscal period from May 15, 2012 (commencement of operations of Class A of the Fund) to October 31, 2012.

Distribution Plan (Class C Only)

The Trust, on behalf of the Fund, has also adopted a Plan with respect to Class C shares of the Fund. The Plan provides that Class C of the Fund will compensate NB Management for administrative and other services provided to Class C of the Fund, its activities and expenses related to the sale and distribution of Class C shares, and ongoing services to investors in Class C of the Fund. Under the Plan, NB Management receives from Class C of the Fund a fee at the annual rate of 1.00% of that Class’s average daily net assets, of which 0.75% is a distribution fee and 0.25% is a service fee. NB Management may pay up to the full amount of this fee to Institutions that make available Class C shares and/or provide services to Class C and its shareholders. The fee paid to an Institution is based on the level of such services provided.

Institutions may use the payments for, among other purposes, compensating employees engaged in sales and/or shareholder servicing. The amount of fees paid by Class C of the Fund during any year may be more or less than the cost of distribution and other services provided to that class of the Fund and its investors. FINRA rules limit the amount of annual distribution and service fees that may be paid by a mutual fund and impose a ceiling on the cumulative distribution fees paid. Class C’s plan complies with these rules.

The table below sets forth the total amount of fees accrued for Class C of the Fund:

	Fiscal Period Ended October 31,
	2012*
Class C	$381

* Fiscal period from May 15, 2012 (commencement of operations of Class C of the Fund) to October 31, 2012.

Distribution Plan (Class A and Class C)

Each Plan requires that NB Management provide the Fund Trustees for their review a quarterly written report identifying the amounts expended by each Class and the purposes for which such expenditures were made.

Prior to approving the Plans, the Fund Trustees considered various factors relating to the implementation of each Plan and determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plans will benefit the applicable Classes of the Fund and their shareholders. To the extent the Plans allow the Fund to penetrate markets to which they would not otherwise have access, the Plans may result in additional sales of Fund shares; this, in turn, may enable the Fund to achieve economies of scale that could reduce expenses. In addition, certain on-going shareholder services may be provided more effectively by Institutions with which shareholders have an existing relationship.

Each Plan is renewable from year to year with respect to a class of the Fund, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Fund Trustees and (2) by a vote of the majority of those Independent Fund Trustees who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the Distribution Agreement or the Plans pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (“Rule 12b-1 Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Plans may not be amended to increase materially the amount of fees paid by any class of the Fund thereunder unless such amendment is approved by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding shares of the class and by the Fund Trustees in the manner described above. A Plan is terminable with respect to a class of the Fund at any time by a vote of a majority of the Rule 12b-1 Trustees or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding shares in the class.

From time to time, the Fund may be closed to new investors. Because the Plans for Class A and Class C shares of the Fund pay for ongoing shareholder and account services, the Board may determine that it is appropriate for the Fund to continue paying a 12b-1 fee, even though the Fund is closed to new investors.

ADDITIONAL PURCHASE INFORMATION

Share Prices and Net Asset Value

The Fund’s shares are bought or sold at the offering price or at a price that is the Fund’s NAV per share. The NAV for each Class of the Fund is calculated by subtracting total liabilities of that Class from total assets attributable to that Class (the market value of the securities the Fund holds plus cash and other assets). The Fund’s per share NAV is calculated by dividing its NAV by the number of Fund shares outstanding attributable to that Class and rounding the result to the nearest full cent.

The Fund calculates its NAV as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE, usually 4 p.m. Eastern time, on each day the NYSE is open. Because the value of the Fund's portfolio securities changes every business day, its share price usually changes as well.

The Fund uses one or more independent pricing services approved by the Board of Trustees to value its debt portfolio securities and certain other instruments. Valuations of debt securities and certain other instruments (other than short-term securities) provided by an independent pricing service are based on readily available bid quotations or, if quotations are not readily available, by methods that include considerations such as: yields or prices of securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. Short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days may be valued at cost, which, when combined with interest earned, approximates market value.

The Fund uses one or more independent pricing services approved by the Board of Trustees to value its equity portfolio securities (including options and securities issued by ETFs). The independent pricing service values equity portfolio securities (including options and securities issued by ETFs) listed on the NYSE, the NYSE MKT LLC or other national securities exchanges, and other securities or instruments for which market quotations are readily available, at the last reported sale price on the day the securities are being valued. Securities traded primarily on the NASDAQ Stock Market are normally valued by the independent pricing service at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price (“NOCP”) provided by NASDAQ each business day. The NOCP is the most recently reported price as of 4:00:02 p.m., Eastern time, unless that price is outside the range of the “inside” bid and asked prices (i.e., the bid and asked prices that dealers quote to each other when trading for their own accounts); in that case, NASDAQ will adjust the price to equal the inside bid or asked price, whichever is closer. Because of delays in reporting trades, the NOCP may not be based on the price of the last trade to occur before the market closes. If there is no reported sale of a security or other instrument on a particular day, the independent pricing service may value the security or other instrument based on market quotations.

NB Management has developed a process to periodically review information provided by independent pricing services for all types of securities.

If a valuation for a security is not available from an independent pricing service or if NB Management believes in good faith that the valuation does not reflect the amount the Fund would receive on a current sale of that security, the Fund seeks to obtain quotations from principal

market makers. If such quotations are not readily available, the Fund may use a fair value estimate made according to methods approved by the Board of Trustees. The Fund may also use these methods to value certain types of illiquid securities and instruments for which broker quotes are rarely, if ever, available, such as options that are out of the money or for which no trading activity exists. Fair value pricing generally will be used if the market in which a portfolio security trades closes early or if trading in a particular security was halted during the day and did not resume prior to the Fund’s net asset value calculation. Numerous factors may be considered when determining the fair value of a security or other instrument, including available analyst, media or other reports, trading in futures or ADRs, and whether the issuer of the security or other instrument being fair valued has other securities or other instruments outstanding.

The value of the Fund's investments in foreign securities is generally determined using the same valuation methods used for other Fund investments, as discussed above. Foreign security prices expressed in local currency values are translated from the local currency into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates as of 4:00 p.m., Eastern time.

If, after the close of the principal market on which a security is traded and before the time the Fund's securities are priced that day, an event occurs that NB Management deems likely to cause a material change in the value of that security, the Fund Trustees have authorized NB Management, subject to the Board’s review, to ascertain a fair value for such security. Such events may include circumstances in which the value of the U.S. markets changes by a percentage deemed significant with respect to the security in question.

The Board has approved the use of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Inc. (“Interactive”) to assist in determining the fair value of foreign income securities whose market values may have changed between the close of trading on the primary markets on which those securities trade and the time as of which the fund calculates its daily NAV. Interactive utilizes adjusted yield and spread curves and a statistical analysis of historical correlations of multiple factors to provide adjusted prices for certain foreign income securities. The Board has also approved the use of Interactive to assist in determining the fair value of foreign equity securities when changes in the value of a certain index suggest that the closing prices on the foreign exchanges may no longer represent the amount that a Fund could expect to receive for those securities. In this event, Interactive will provide adjusted prices for certain foreign equity securities using a statistical analysis of historical correlations of multiple factors. In the case of both foreign income and equity securities, in the absence of precise information about the market values of these foreign securities as of the close of the NYSE, the Board has determined on the basis of available data that prices adjusted in this way are likely to be closer to the prices a Fund could realize on a current sale than are the prices of those securities established at the close of the foreign markets in which the securities primarily trade. Foreign securities are traded in foreign markets that may be open on days when the NYSE is closed. As a result, the NAV of a Fund may be significantly affected on days when shareholders do not have access to that Fund.

Under the 1940 Act, the Fund is required to act in good faith in determining the fair value of portfolio securities. The SEC has recognized that a security’s valuation may differ depending on the method used for determining value. The fair value ascertained for a security is an estimate and there is no assurance, given the limited information available at the time of fair valuation,

that a security’s fair value will be the same as or close to the subsequent opening market price for that security.

Subscriptions in Kind

The Fund may from time to time accept securities in exchange for Fund shares.

Financial Intermediaries

The Fund has authorized one or more financial intermediaries to receive purchase and redemption orders on its behalf. Such financial intermediaries are authorized to designate other administrative intermediaries to receive purchase and redemption orders on the Fund’s behalf. The Fund will be deemed to have received a purchase and redemption order when a financial intermediary or its designee receives the order. Purchase and redemption orders will be priced at the next share price or offering price to be calculated after the order has been “accepted” as defined in the Prospectus.

Automatic Investing and Dollar Cost Averaging

For each Class that is sold directly to investors, shareholders in that Class (“Direct Shareholders”) may arrange to have a fixed amount automatically invested in Fund shares of that Class each month. To do so, a Direct Shareholder must complete an application, available from the Distributor, electing to have automatic investments funded either through (1) redemptions from his or her account in an eligible money market fund outside the Neuberger Berman fund family or (2) withdrawals from the shareholder’s checking account. In either case, the minimum monthly investment is $100. A Direct Shareholder who elects to participate in automatic investing through his or her checking account must include a voided check with the completed application. A completed application should be sent to Neuberger Berman Funds, Boston Service Center, P.O. Box 8403, Boston, MA 02266-8403.

Automatic investing enables a Direct Shareholder to take advantage of “dollar cost averaging.” As a result of dollar cost averaging, a Direct Shareholder’s average cost of Fund shares generally would be lower than if the shareholder purchased a fixed number of shares at the same pre-set intervals. Additional information on dollar cost averaging may be obtained from the Distributor.

Sales Charges

Class A Purchases

Pursuant to a determination of eligibility by NB Management, Class A shares of the Fund may be sold at net asset value to:

100

	1.	current or retired directors, trustees, and officers of the Neuberger Berman Funds, current or retired employees and partners of NB Management or Neuberger Berman and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with a Neuberger Berman Fund, NB Management or Neuberger Berman;
	2.	current employees of firms that have entered into selling agreements to distribute shares of the Neuberger Berman Funds;
	3.	current employees of registered investment advisers that invest in the Neuberger Berman Funds either for proprietary accounts or on behalf of clients; and
	4.	immediate family members of persons listed in (1) through (3) above (as “immediate family” is defined in the prospectus);
	5.	companies exchanging securities with a Fund through a merger, acquisition or exchange offer;
	6.	insurance company separate accounts;
	7.	NB Management or Neuberger Berman and its affiliated companies;
	8.	an individual or entity with a substantial business relationship with NB Management or Neuberger Berman and its affiliated companies, or an individual or entity related or relating to such individual or entity that holds its shares directly with a Fund;
	9.	wholesalers and full-time employees directly supporting wholesalers involved in the distribution of insurance company separate accounts of insurance companies that have a participation agreement with NB Management and whose underlying investments are managed by NB Management or Neuberger Berman and its affiliated companies and that hold their shares directly with a Fund;
	10.	banks, broker-dealers and other financial institutions (including registered investment advisors and financial planners) that have entered into an agreement with the Distributor or one of its affiliates, purchasing shares on behalf of clients participating in a fund supermarket or in a wrap program, asset allocation program or other program in which the clients pay an asset-based fee;
	11.	Employer-sponsored defined contribution – type plans, including 401(k) plans, 457 plans, 403(b) plans, profit-sharing and money purchase pension plans, defined benefit plans and non-qualified deferred compensation plans, and individual retirement account (“IRA”) rollovers involving retirement plan assets invested in the Funds and transferred in-kind to an IRA held at a financial intermediary that has an agreement with the Distributor to service such accounts;
	12.	Employee benefit and retirement plans for NB Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with NB Management; and
	13.	Certain IRAs that are part of an IRA platform sponsored by a financial intermediary that has an agreement with the Distributor, which specifically provides that the Funds' shares are offered at NAV on such IRA platform.

Shares are offered at net asset value to these persons and organizations due to anticipated economies in sales effort and expense. Once an account is established under this net asset value privilege, additional investments can be made at net asset value for the life of the account.

101

Dealer commissions and compensation.

Commissions (up to 1.00%) are paid to dealers who initiate and are responsible for certain Class A share purchases not subject to sales charges. These purchases consist of aggregate purchases of $1 million or more, purchases by employer-sponsored defined contribution-type retirement plans investing $1 million or more or with 100 or more eligible employees, and purchases made at net asset value by certain retirement plans, endowments and foundations with assets of $50 million or more. Commissions on such investments (other than IRA rollover assets that roll over at no sales charge under the Fund’s IRA rollover policy as described in the Prospectus) are paid to dealers at the following rates: 1.00% on amounts from $1 million to $3,999,999, 0.50% on amounts from $4 million to $29,999,999 and 0.25% on amounts from $30 million and above. Commissions are based on cumulative investments and are reset annually.

A dealer concession of up to 1% may be paid by the Fund under its Class A plan of distribution to reimburse the Distributor in connection with dealer and wholesaler compensation paid by it with respect to investments made with no initial sales charge.

See Appendix B to this SAI for information regarding sales charge reductions and waivers.

ADDITIONAL EXCHANGE INFORMATION

As more fully set forth in the respective fund’s prospectus, if shareholders purchased Institutional, Investor, Trust Class or Class R6 shares of a fund in the fund family directly, they may redeem at least $1,000 worth of the fund’s shares and invest the proceeds in shares of the corresponding class of one or more of the other funds in the fund family, provided that the minimum investment and other eligibility requirements of the other fund(s) are met. Investor Class shares of a fund in the fund family may also be exchanged for Trust Class shares where NB Management is the Institution acting as the record owner on behalf of the shareholder making the exchange. Class R6 shares of a fund in the fund family may also be exchanged for Institutional shares where (1) NB Management is the Institution acting as the record owner on behalf of the shareholder making the exchange, and (2) Class R6 shares of the other fund in the fund family are not available (otherwise, Class R6 shares would be exchanged for Class R6 shares of the other fund in the fund family).

In addition, Grandfathered Investors (as defined in the Class A and Class C shares Prospectuses) may exchange their shares (either Investor Class or Trust Class) for Class A shares where Investor Class or Trust Class shares of the other fund in the fund family are not available; otherwise, they will exchange their shares into the corresponding class of the other fund in the fund family. Class R6 shareholders may exchange their shares for Institutional shares where

102

Class R6 shares of the other fund in the fund family are not available; otherwise, they will exchange their shares into Class R6 of the other fund in the fund family.

An Institution may exchange a fund’s Advisor Class, Investor Class, Trust Class, Institutional Class, Class A, Class C, Class R3, and Class R6 shares (if the shareholder did not purchase the fund’s shares directly) for shares of the corresponding class of one or more of the other funds in the fund family, if made available through that Institution. Most Institutions allow you to take advantage of the exchange program.

If shareholders purchased shares of a fund in the fund family directly, with the exception of Class R6, they may exchange those shares for shares of the following eligible money market funds (and classes): Investment Class shares of State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund, Investment Class shares of State Street Institutional Liquid Reserves Fund, and Investment Class shares of State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund. An investor may exchange shares of an eligible money market fund for shares of a particular class of a fund in the Neuberger Berman fund family only if the investor holds, through NB Management, both shares of that eligible money market fund and shares of that particular class of that fund in the Neuberger Berman fund family.

Exchanges are generally not subject to any applicable sales charges. However, exchanges from eligible money market funds are subject to any applicable sales charges on the fund in the Neuberger Berman fund family being purchased, unless the eligible money market fund shares were acquired through an exchange from a fund in the Neuberger Berman fund family having a sales charge or by reinvestment or cross-reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions from a fund in the Neuberger Berman fund family having a sales charge.

Most investment providers allow you to take advantage of the exchange program. Please contact your investment provider or NB Management for further information on exchanging your shares.

Before effecting an exchange, fund shareholders must obtain and should review a currently effective prospectus of the fund into which the exchange is to be made. An exchange is treated as a sale and purchase for federal income tax purposes, and, depending on the circumstances, a capital gain or loss may be realized.

Each of the Neuberger Berman Funds may terminate or materially alter its exchange privilege without notice to shareholders.

ADDITIONAL REDEMPTION INFORMATION

Suspension of Redemptions

The right to redeem Fund shares may be suspended or payment of the redemption price postponed (1) when the NYSE is closed, (2) when trading on the NYSE is restricted, (3) when an emergency exists as a result of which it is not reasonably practicable for the Fund to dispose of securities it owns or fairly to determine the value of its net assets, or (4) for such other period as the SEC may by order permit for the protection of the Fund’s shareholders. Applicable SEC rules

103

and regulations shall govern whether the conditions prescribed in (2) or (3) exist. If the right of redemption is suspended, shareholders may withdraw their offers of redemption, or they will receive payment at the NAV per share in effect at the close of business on the first day the NYSE is open (“Business Day”) after termination of the suspension.

Redemptions in Kind

The Fund reserves the right, under certain conditions, to honor any request for redemption by making payment in whole or in part in securities valued as described in “Share Prices and Net Asset Value” above. If payment is made in securities, a shareholder or Institution generally will incur brokerage expenses or other transaction costs in converting those securities into cash and will be subject to fluctuation in the market prices of those securities until they are sold. The Fund does not redeem in kind under normal circumstances, but would do so when the Fund Trustees determine that it is in the best interests of the Fund’s shareholders as a whole.

Abandoned Property

It is the responsibility of the investor to ensure that NB Management maintains a correct address for the investor’s account(s). An incorrect address may cause an investor’s account statements and other mailings to be returned to NB Management. If NB Management is unable to locate the investor, then it will determine whether the investor’s account has legally been abandoned. NB Management is legally obligated to escheat (or transfer) abandoned property to the appropriate state’s unclaimed property administrator in accordance with statutory requirements. The investor’s last known address of record determines which state has jurisdiction.

CONVERSION INFORMATION

If consistent with your investment provider’s program, Class A and Class C shares of the Fund that have been purchased by an investment provider on behalf of clients participating in (i) 401(k) plans, 457 plans, employer-sponsored 403(b) plans, profit-sharing and money purchase pension plans, defined benefit plans and non-qualified deferred compensation plans or (ii) investment programs in which the clients pay a fixed or asset-based fee, may be converted into Institutional Class shares of the same Fund if the investment provider satisfies any then-applicable eligibility requirements for investment in Institutional Class shares of the Fund. Any such conversion will be effected at net asset value without the imposition of any sales load, fee or other charges by the Fund. Please contact your investment provider about any fees that it may charge.

DIVIDENDS AND OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS

The Fund distributes to its shareholders substantially all of its net investment income (by Class, after deducting expenses attributable to the Class), net capital gains and net gains from foreign currency transactions it earns or realizes that are allocable to that Class. Capital gain realization is one factor that a Portfolio Manager may consider in deciding when to sell a security. The Fund’s net investment income, for financial accounting purposes, consists of all income accrued on its assets less accrued expenses but does not include capital and foreign

104

currency gains and losses. Net investment income and realized gains and losses are reflected in the Fund’s NAV until they are distributed. The Fund calculates its net investment income and NAV per share as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE on each Business Day (usually 4:00 p.m. Eastern time).

The Fund normally pays dividends from net investment income and distributions of net realized capital and foreign currency gains, if any, once annually, in December.

The Fund’s dividends and other distributions are automatically reinvested in additional shares of the distributing Class of the Fund, unless the shareholder elects to receive them in cash (“cash election”). Direct Shareholders may make a cash election on the original account application or at a later date by writing to State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”), c/o Boston Service Center, P.O. Box 8403, Boston, MA 02266-8403. Cash distributions can be paid by check or through an electronic transfer to a bank account or used to purchase shares of another fund in the fund family, designated in the shareholder’s original account application. To the extent dividends and other distributions are subject to federal, state, and/or local income taxation, they are taxable to the shareholders (or Institution) whether received in cash or reinvested in Fund shares.

A cash election with respect to the Fund remains in effect until the shareholder (or Institution) notifies State Street in writing to discontinue the election. If it is determined, however, that the U.S. Postal Service cannot properly deliver the Fund’s mailings to a shareholder for 180 days, the Fund will terminate the shareholder’s cash election and the shareholder’s dividends and other distributions thereafter will automatically be reinvested in additional Fund shares of the relevant Class until the shareholder (or Institution) requests in writing to State Street or the Fund that the cash election be reinstated.

Dividend or other distribution checks that are not cashed or deposited within 180 days from being issued will be reinvested in additional shares of the distributing Class of the Fund at its NAV per share on the day the check is reinvested. No interest will accrue on amounts represented by uncashed dividend or other distribution checks.

ADDITIONAL TAX INFORMATION

Taxation of the Fund

To qualify or continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC under the Code, the Fund – which is treated as a separate corporation for federal tax purposes – must distribute to its shareholders for each taxable year at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (consisting generally of net investment income, the excess of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss, and net gains and losses from certain foreign currency transactions, all determined without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) (“Distribution Requirement”) and must meet several additional requirements. These requirements include the following:

(1) the Fund must derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from (i) dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including gains

105

from Financial Instruments) derived with respect to its business of investing in securities or those currencies (“Qualifying Other Income”) and (ii) net income from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (“QPTP”) (“Income Requirement”); and

(2) at the close of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year, (i) at least 50% of the value of its total assets must be represented by cash and cash items, Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount that does not exceed 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and that does not represent more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities (equity securities of QPTPs being considered voting securities for these purposes), and (ii) not more than 25% of the value of its total assets may be invested in (a) securities (other than Government securities or securities of other RICs) of any one issuer (such as the Subsidiary), (b) securities (other than securities of other RICs) of two or more issuers the Fund controls that are determined to be engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses, or (c) securities of one or more QPTPs (“25% Diversification Requirement,” collectively, “Diversification Requirements”).

If the Fund invests cash collateral received in connection with securities lending in an unregistered fund (as noted above under “Investment Information -- Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions”), the Fund generally will be treated as owning a proportionate share of the unregistered fund’s assets for purposes of determining the Fund’s compliance with the Diversification Requirements and certain other provisions (including the provision that permits it to enable its shareholders to get the benefit of foreign taxes it pays, as described below) and being entitled to the income on that share for purposes of determining whether it satisfies the Income Requirement.

By qualifying for treatment as a RIC, the Fund (but not its shareholders) will be relieved of federal income tax on the part of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain ( i.e., the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) that it distributes to its shareholders. If the Fund failed to qualify for treatment as a RIC for any taxable year -- either (1) by failing to satisfy the Distribution Requirement, even if it satisfied the Income and Diversification Requirements, or (2) by failing to satisfy the Income Requirement and/or either Diversification Requirement and was unable, or determined not, to avail itself of provisions enacted as part of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 that enable a RIC to cure a failure to satisfy any of the Income and Diversification Requirements as long as the failure “is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect” and the RIC pays a deductible tax calculated in accordance with those provisions and meets certain other requirements -- (a) it would be taxed on the full amount of its taxable income for that year without being able to deduct the distributions it makes to its shareholders and (b) the shareholders would treat all those distributions, including distributions of net capital gain, as dividends to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits. Those dividends would be taxable as ordinary income, except that, for individual shareholders, the part thereof that is “qualified dividend income” (as described in the Prospectus) (“QDI”) would be taxable for federal tax purposes at the rate for net capital gain (a maximum of 15% or 20% for taxpayers with taxable income exceeding $400,000 or $450,000 if married filing jointly). In addition, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make substantial distributions before requalifying for RIC treatment.

106

The Fund will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax (“Excise Tax”) to the extent it fails to distribute by the end of any calendar year substantially all of its ordinary income for that year and capital gain net income for the one-year period ended on October 31 of that year, plus certain other amounts. The Fund intends to make sufficient distributions each year to avoid liability for the Excise Tax.

Dividends and interest the Fund receives, and gains it realizes, on foreign securities may be subject to income, withholding, or other taxes imposed by foreign countries and U.S. possessions that would reduce the total return on its securities. Tax treaties between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate foreign taxes, however, and many foreign countries do not impose taxes on capital gains in respect of investments by foreign investors.

The Fund may invest in the stock of “passive foreign investment companies” (“PFICs”). A PFIC is any foreign corporation (with certain exceptions) that, in general, meets either of the following tests: (1) at least 75% of its gross income for the taxable year is passive or (2) an average of at least 50% of its assets produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. Under certain circumstances, the Fund will be subject to federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” it receives on the stock of a PFIC or of any gain on its disposition of the stock (collectively, “PFIC income”), plus interest thereon, even if the Fund distributes the PFIC income as a taxable dividend to its shareholders. The balance of the PFIC income will be included in the Fund’s investment company taxable income and, accordingly, will not be taxable to it to the extent it distributes that income to its shareholders. The Fund’s distributions attributable to PFIC income will not be eligible for the 15% maximum federal income tax rate on individuals’ QDI.

If the Fund invests in a PFIC and elects to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”), then in lieu of the Fund’s incurring the foregoing tax and interest obligation, the Fund would be required to include in income each taxable year its pro rata share of the QEF’s annual ordinary earnings and net capital gain -- which the Fund most likely would have to distribute to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax -- even if the Fund did not receive those earnings and gain from the QEF. In most instances it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to make this election because of certain requirements thereof.

The Fund may elect to “mark-to-market” any stock in a PFIC it owns at the end of its taxable year. “Marking-to-market,” in this context, means including in gross income each taxable year (and treating as ordinary income) the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock over the Fund’s adjusted basis therein as of the end of that year. Pursuant to the election, the Fund also would be allowed to deduct (as an ordinary, not a capital, loss) the excess, if any, of its adjusted basis in PFIC stock over the fair market value thereof as of the taxable year-end, but only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains with respect to that stock the Fund included in income for prior taxable years under the election. The Fund’s adjusted basis in each PFIC’s stock subject to the election would be adjusted to reflect the amounts of income included and deductions taken thereunder.

Investors should be aware that the Fund may not be able, at the time it acquires a foreign issuer’s shares, to ascertain whether the issuer is a PFIC and that a foreign corporation may

107

become a PFIC after the Fund acquires shares therein. While the Fund generally will seek to minimize its investments in PFIC shares, and to make appropriate elections when they are available, to lessen the adverse tax consequences detailed above, there are no guarantees that the Fund will be able to do so.

The Fund’s use of hedging strategies, such as writing (selling) and purchasing options and futures contracts and entering into forward contracts, involves complex rules that will determine for income tax purposes the amount, character, and timing of recognition of the gains and losses the Fund realizes in connection therewith. Gains from the disposition of foreign currencies (except certain gains that may be excluded by future regulations), and gains from Financial Instruments the Fund derives with respect to its business of investing in securities or foreign currencies, will be treated as Qualifying Other Income.

Exchange-traded futures contracts, certain foreign currency contracts, and “nonequity” options ( i.e. , certain listed options, such as those on a “broad-based” securities index) -- excluding any “securities futures contract” that is not a “dealer securities futures contract” (both as defined in the Code) and any interest rate swap, currency swap, basis swap, interest rate cap, interest rate floor, commodity swap, equity swap, equity index swap, credit default swap, or similar agreement -- that are subject to section 1256 of the Code (“Section 1256 contracts”) in which the Fund may invest are required to be “marked-to-market” (that is, treated as having been sold at market value) for federal income tax purposes at the end of the Fund’s taxable year. Sixty percent of any net gain or loss recognized as a result of these deemed sales, and 60% of any net realized gain or loss from any actual sales, of Section 1256 contracts are treated as long-term capital gain or loss; the remainder is treated as short-term capital gain or loss. These rules may operate to increase the amount that the Fund must distribute to satisfy the Distribution Requirement ( i.e. , with respect to the portion treated as short-term capital gain), which will be taxable to its shareholders as ordinary income when distributed to them, and to increase the net capital gain the Fund recognizes, without in either case increasing the cash available to it. Section 1256 contracts also may be marked-to-market for purposes of the Excise Tax. The Fund may elect to exclude certain transactions from the operation of section 1256, although doing so may have the effect of increasing the relative proportion of short-term capital gain (as noted above, taxable to its shareholders as ordinary income when distributed to them) and/or increasing the amount of dividends it must distribute to meet the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax.

If the Fund has an “appreciated financial position” -- generally, an interest (including an interest through an option, futures or forward contract, or short sale) with respect to any stock, debt instrument (other than “straight debt”), or partnership interest the fair market value of which exceeds its adjusted basis -- and enters into a “constructive sale” of the position, the Fund will be treated as having made an actual sale thereof, with the result that it will recognize gain at that time. A constructive sale generally consists of a short sale, an offsetting notional principal contract, or a futures or forward contract the Fund or a related person enters into with respect to the same or substantially identical property. In addition, if the appreciated financial position is itself a short sale or such a contract, acquisition of the underlying property or substantially identical property will be deemed a constructive sale. The foregoing will not apply, however, to any transaction of the Fund during any taxable year that otherwise would be treated as a constructive sale if the transaction is closed within 30 days after the end of that year and the

108

Fund holds the appreciated financial position unhedged for 60 days after that closing ( i.e ., at no time during that 60-day period is the Fund’s risk of loss regarding that position reduced by reason of certain specified transactions with respect to substantially identical or related property, such as having an option to sell, being contractually obligated to sell, making a short sale of, or granting an option to buy substantially identical stock or securities).

The Fund may acquire zero coupon securities or other securities issued with OID. As a holder of those securities, the Fund must take into income the OID that accrues on the securities during the taxable year, even if it receives no corresponding payment on them during the year. Similarly, the Fund must include in its gross income each taxable year any increase for that year in the net principal value of each inflation-indexed security it holds, even though it does not receive cash representing the increase until the security matures. Because the Fund annually must distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income (including accrued OID and other non-cash income) to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax, the Fund may be required in a particular year to distribute as a dividend an amount that is greater than the total amount of cash it actually receives. Those distributions will be made from the Fund’s cash assets or, if necessary, from the proceeds of sales of its securities. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses from those sales, which would increase or decrease its investment company taxable income and/or net capital gain.

The Fund may invest in interests in MLPs, which generally are classified as partnerships for federal tax purposes. Most MLPs in which the Fund may invest are expected to be QPTPs, all the net income from which (regardless of source) would be qualifying income under the Income Requirement. If the Fund invests in an MLP or an ETF (organized as a partnership) that is not a QPTP, including a company principally engaged in the real estate industry that is classified for federal tax purposes as a partnership (and not as a corporation or REIT), the net income the Fund earns therefrom would be treated as Qualifying Other Income only to the extent it would be such if realized directly by the Fund in the same manner as realized by that MLP, ETF, or company.

The Fund may invest in REITs that (1) hold residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) or (2) engage in mortgage securitization transactions that cause the REIT to be a taxable mortgage pool (“TMP”) or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP. A portion of the net income allocable to REMIC residual interest holders may be an “excess inclusion.” The Code authorizes the issuance of regulations dealing with the taxation and reporting of excess inclusion income of REITs and RICs that hold residual REMIC interests and of REITs, or qualified REIT subsidiaries, that are TMPs. Although those regulations have not yet been issued, in 2006 the U.S. Treasury Department and the Service issued a notice (“Notice”) announcing that, pending the issuance of further guidance, the Service would apply the principles in the following paragraphs to all excess inclusion income, whether from REMIC residual interests or TMPs.

The Notice provides that a REIT must (1) determine whether it or its qualified REIT subsidiary (or a part of either) is a TMP and, if so, calculate the TMP’s excess inclusion income under a “reasonable method,” (2) allocate its excess inclusion income to its shareholders generally in proportion to dividends paid, (3) inform shareholders that are not “disqualified organizations” ( i.e. , governmental units and tax-exempt entities that are not subject to tax on their unrelated business taxable income “UBTI”) of the amount and character of the excess

109

inclusion income allocated thereto, (4) pay tax (at the highest federal income tax rate imposed on corporations) on the excess inclusion income allocated to its disqualified organization shareholders, and (5) apply the withholding tax provisions with respect to the excess inclusion part of dividends paid to foreign persons without regard to any treaty exception or reduction in tax rate. Excess inclusion income allocated to certain tax-exempt entities (including qualified retirement plans, IRAs, and public charities) constitutes UBTI to them.

A RIC with excess inclusion income is subject to rules identical to those in clauses (2) through (5) (substituting “that are nominees” for “that are not ‘disqualified organizations’” in clause (3) and inserting “record shareholders that are” after “its” in clause (4)). The Notice further provides that a RIC is not required to report the amount and character of the excess inclusion income allocated to its shareholders that are not nominees, except that (1) a RIC with excess inclusion income from all sources that exceeds 1% of its gross income must do so and (2) any other RIC must do so by taking into account only excess inclusion income allocated to the RIC from REITs the excess inclusion income of which exceeded 3% of its dividends. The Fund will not invest directly in REMIC residual interests and does not intend to invest in REITs that, to its knowledge, invest in those interests or are TMPs or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP.

The Subsidiary

The Fund may invest a portion of its assets (not exceeding the amount permitted by the 25% Diversification Requirement) in the Subsidiary, which would be classified as a corporation for federal tax purposes. A foreign corporation, such as the Subsidiary, generally is not subject to federal income tax unless it is engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. The Subsidiary would be operated in a manner that is expected to meet the requirements of a safe harbor under section 864(b)(2) of the Code, under which it could trade in stocks or securities or certain commodities for its own account without being deemed to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business. If, however, certain of the Subsidiary’s activities did not meet those safe harbor requirements, it might be considered as engaging in such a trade or business. Even if the Subsidiary is not so engaged, it could be subject to a withholding tax at a rate of 30% on all or a portion of its U.S.-source gross income that is not effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business.

The Subsidiary would be treated as a controlled foreign corporation (a “CFC”), and the Fund would be a “United States shareholder” thereof. As a result, the Fund would be required to include in its gross income each taxable year all of the Subsidiary’s “subpart F income,” which generally is treated as ordinary income; it is expected that virtually all of the Subsidiary’s income would be “subpart F income.” If the Subsidiary realized a net loss, that loss generally would not be available to offset the Fund’s income. The Fund’s inclusion of the Subsidiary’s “subpart F income” in its gross income would increase the Fund’s tax basis in its shares of the Subsidiary. Distributions by the Subsidiary to the Fund would not be taxable to the extent of its previously undistributed “subpart F income” and would reduce the Fund’s tax basis in those shares.

Although gains from the disposition of commodities are not considered Qualifying Other Income, the Service has issued numerous private letter rulings (“PLRs”) since 2006 that a RIC’s inclusion of “subpart F income” from a wholly owned foreign subsidiary (such as the Subsidiary) is

110

Qualifying Other Income. A PLR may be cited as precedent, however, only by the taxpayer(s) to which it is issued. Moreover, in July 2011, the Service suspended the issuance of further PLRs to RICs seeking commodities exposure through the use of foreign wholly owned subsidiaries (and structured notes); it is understood that the Service initiated that suspension, which was still in effect as of the effective date of this SAI, to re-examine the policies underlying the previously issued PLRs. There can be no assurance that the Service will resume issuing those PLRs or that there will not be changes in tax or other federal law that might adversely affect the Fund’s possible investment in the Subsidiary. If the Fund invests a portion of its assets in the Subsidiary and the Service changed its position expressed in the issued PLRs, the Fund may be unable to qualify as a RIC for one or more years.

Taxation of the Fund’s Shareholders

If Fund shares are sold at a loss after being held for six months or less, the loss will be treated as long-term, instead of short-term, capital loss to the extent of any capital gain distributions received on those shares.

The Fund is required to withhold and remit to the U.S. Treasury 28% of all dividends, capital gain distributions, and redemption proceeds (regardless of the extent to which gain or loss may be realized) otherwise payable to any individuals and certain other non-corporate shareholders who do not provide the Fund with a correct taxpayer identification number. Withholding at that rate also is required from dividends and other distributions otherwise payable to those shareholders who are subject to backup withholding for any other reason.

Dividends the Fund pays to a foreign shareholder, other than (1) dividends paid to a foreign shareholder whose ownership of shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business the shareholder carries on and (2) capital gain distributions paid to a nonresident alien individual who is physically present in the United States for no more than 182 days during the taxable year, generally will be subject to a federal withholding tax of 30% (or lower treaty rate). If a foreign shareholder’s ownership of Fund shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the foreign shareholder, the foreign shareholder will not be subject to such withholding tax but will be subject to federal income tax on income dividends from the Fund as if it were a U.S. shareholder. A foreign shareholder generally will be exempt from federal income tax on gain realized on the sale of Fund shares and Fund distributions of net capital gain, unless the shareholder is a nonresident alien individual present in the United States for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the taxable year (special rules apply in the case of a shareholder that is a foreign trust or foreign partnership). For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2014, foreign shareholders will not be subject to withholding tax on “short-term capital gain dividends” and “interest-related dividends” (if any) paid by the Fund.

Under legislation known as “FATCA” (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act), the Fund will be required to withhold 30% of the ordinary dividends it pays after June 30, 2014, and the gross proceeds of share redemptions and certain capital gain dividends it pays after December 31, 2016, to shareholders that fail to meet prescribed information reporting or certification requirements. In general, no such withholding will be required with respect to a U.S. person or foreign individual that timely provides the certifications required by the Fund or its agent on a valid IRS Form W-9 or W-8, respectively. Shareholders potentially subject to

111

withholding include foreign financial institutions (“FFIs”), such as foreign investment funds, and nonfinancial foreign entities (“NFFEs”). To avoid withholding under FATCA, an FFI generally must enter into an information sharing agreement with the Service in which it agrees to report certain identifying information (including name, address, and taxpayer identification number) with respect to its U.S. account holders (which, in the case of an entity shareholder, may include its direct and indirect U.S. owners), and an NFFE generally must identify itself and may be required to provide other required information to the Fund or other withholding agent regarding its U.S. owners, if any. Such foreign shareholders also may fall into certain exempt, excepted or deemed compliant categories as established by regulations and other guidance. A non-U.S. entity that invests in the Fund will need to provide the Fund with documentation properly certifying the entity’s status under FATCA in order to avoid FATCA withholding. A foreign shareholder resident or doing business in a country that has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the U.S. to implement FATCA will be exempt from FATCA withholding provided that the shareholder and the applicable foreign government comply with the terms of such agreement. Non-U.S. investors should consult their own tax advisers regarding the impact of these requirements on their investment in the Fund.

As described in “Maintaining Your Account” in the Prospectus, the Fund may close a shareholder’s account and redeem the remaining shares if the account balance falls below the specified minimum and the shareholder fails to re-establish the minimum balance after being given the opportunity to do so. If an account that is closed pursuant to the foregoing was maintained for an IRA (including a Roth IRA) or a qualified retirement plan (including a simplified employee pension plan, savings incentive match plan for employees, Keogh plan, corporate profit-sharing and money purchase pension plan, Code section 401(k) plan, and Code section 403(b)(7) account), the Fund’s payment of the redemption proceeds may result in adverse tax consequences for the accountholder. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers regarding any such consequences.

A shareholder’s basis in Fund shares that he or she acquires after December 31, 2011 (“Covered Shares”) will be determined in accordance with the Fund’s default method, which is average basis, unless the shareholder affirmatively elects in writing (which may be electronic) to use a different acceptable basis determination method, such as the specific identification method. The basis determination method a Fund shareholder elects (or the default method) may not be changed with respect to a redemption of Covered Shares after the settlement date of the redemption.

In addition to the previous requirement to report the gross proceeds from a redemption of shares, the Fund (or its administrative agent) must report to the Service and furnish to its shareholders the basis information for Covered Shares and indicate whether they had a short-term (one year or less) or long-term (more than one year) holding period. Fund shareholders should consult with their tax advisors to determine the best Service-accepted basis determination method for their tax situation and to obtain more information about how the basis reporting law applies to them.

112

FUND TRANSACTIONS

Orders for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities are placed on behalf of the Fund by NB Management, the Adviser, or the Subadviser pursuant to the terms of the applicable advisory agreement. In effecting securities transactions, the Fund seeks to obtain the best price and execution of orders. Affiliates of a Manager are permitted to act as brokers for the Fund in the purchase and sale of its portfolio securities (other than certain securities traded on the OTC market) where such brokers are capable of providing best execution (“Affiliated Brokers”).

For Fund transactions which involve securities traded on the OTC market, the Fund purchases and sells OTC securities in principal transactions with dealers who are the principal market makers for such securities. Loans will be purchased in individually negotiated transactions with commercial banks, thrifts, insurance companies, finance companies and other financial institutions. In determining whether to purchase loans from these financial institutions, the Manager may consider, among other factors, the financial strength, professional ability, level of service and research capability of the institution. While financial institutions generally are not required to repurchase loans which they have sold, they may act as principal or on an agency basis in connection with the Fund’s disposition of loans.

During the fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, the Fund paid brokerage commissions of $51,858, of which $0 was paid to Neuberger Berman. During the fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, transactions in which the Fund used Neuberger Berman as broker comprised 0% of the aggregate dollar amount of transactions involving the payment of commissions, and 0% of the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the Fund. 100% of the $51,858 paid to other brokers by that Fund during that fiscal year (representing commissions on transactions involving approximately $75,231,723) was directed to those brokers at least partially on the basis of research services they provided. During the fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, that Fund acquired securities of the following of its “regular brokers or dealers” (as defined under the 1940 Act): J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.; at that date, that Fund held the securities of its regular brokers or dealers with an aggregate value as follows: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., $111,286.

Commission rates, being a component of price, are considered along with other relevant factors in evaluating best price and execution. In selecting a broker to execute Fund transactions other than an Affiliated Broker, as defined below, NB Management, the Adviser and each Subadviser generally consider the quality and reliability of brokerage services, including execution capability, speed of execution, overall performance, and financial responsibility, and may consider, among other factors, research and other investment information or services (“research services”) provided by those brokers as well as any expense offset arrangements offered by the brokers.

The Fund may use an Affiliated Broker where, in the judgment of the Manager, that firm is able to obtain a price and execution at least as favorable as other qualified brokers. To the Fund’s knowledge, no affiliate of any Fund receives give-ups or reciprocal business in connection with its securities transactions.

The use of an Affiliated Broker for the Fund is subject to the requirements of Section 11(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 11(a) prohibits members of national

113

securities exchanges from retaining compensation for executing exchange transactions for accounts which they or their affiliates manage, except where they have the authorization of the persons authorized to transact business for the account and comply with certain annual reporting requirements. Before an Affiliated Broker is used, the Trust and the Manager expressly authorize the Affiliated Broker to retain such compensation, and the Affiliate Broker would have to agree to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 11(a).

Under the 1940 Act, commissions paid by the Fund to an Affiliated Broker in connection with a purchase or sale of securities on a securities exchange may not exceed the usual and customary broker’s commission. Accordingly, with respect to the Fund the commissions paid an Affiliated Broker will be at least as favorable to the Fund as those that would be charged by other qualified brokers having comparable execution capability in NB Management’s judgment. The Fund does not deem it practicable and in its best interests to solicit competitive bids for commissions on each transaction effected by an Affiliated Broker. However, when an Affiliated Broker is executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the Fund, consideration regularly will be given to information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers on comparable transactions during comparable periods of time. The 1940 Act generally prohibits an Affiliated Broker from acting as principal in the purchase of portfolio securities from, or the sale of portfolio securities to, the Fund unless an appropriate exemption is available.

A committee of Independent Fund Trustees from time to time will review, among other things, information relating to the commissions charged by an Affiliated Broker to the Fund and to its other customers and information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers having comparable execution capability.

To ensure that accounts of all investment clients, including the Fund, are treated fairly in the event that an Affiliated Broker receives transaction instructions regarding the same security for more than one investment account at or about the same time, the Affiliated Broker may combine orders placed on behalf of clients, including advisory accounts in which affiliated persons have an investment interest, for the purpose of negotiating brokerage commissions or obtaining a more favorable price. Where appropriate, securities purchased or sold may be allocated, in terms of amount, to a client according to the proportion that the size of the order placed by that account bears to the aggregate size of orders contemporaneously placed by the other accounts, subject to de minimis exceptions. All participating accounts will pay or receive the same price when orders are combined.

Under policies adopted by the Board of Trustees, an Affiliated Broker may enter into agency cross-trades on behalf of the Fund. An agency cross-trade is a securities transaction in which the same broker acts as agent on both sides of the trade and the broker or an affiliate has discretion over one of the participating accounts. In this situation, the Affiliated Broker would receive brokerage commissions from both participants in the trade. The other account participating in an agency cross-trade with the Fund cannot be an account over which the Affiliated Broker exercises investment discretion. A member of the Board of Trustees who will not be affiliated with the Affiliated Broker will review information about each agency cross-trade that the Fund participates in.

114

A committee comprised of officers of NB Management and/or employees of NBAIM who are Portfolio Managers of the Fund and Other NB Funds (collectively, “NB Funds”) and some of NBAIM’s managed accounts (“Managed Accounts”) periodically evaluates throughout the year the nature and quality of the brokerage and research services provided by other brokers. Based on this evaluation, the committee establishes a list and projected rankings of preferred brokers for use in determining the relative amounts of commissions to be allocated to those brokers. Ordinarily, the brokers on the list effect a large portion of the brokerage transactions for the NB Funds and the Managed Accounts. However, in any semi-annual period, brokers not on the list may be used, and the relative amounts of brokerage commissions paid to the brokers on the list may vary substantially from the projected rankings. These variations reflect the following factors, among others: (1) brokers not on the list or ranking below other brokers on the list may be selected for particular transactions because they provide better price and/or execution, which is the primary consideration in allocating brokerage; (2) adjustments may be required because of periodic changes in the execution capabilities of or research or other services provided by particular brokers or in the execution or research needs of the NB Funds and/or the Managed Accounts; and (3) the aggregate amount of brokerage commissions generated by transactions for the NB Funds and the Managed Accounts may change substantially from one semi-annual period to the next.

The commissions paid to a broker other than an Affiliated Broker may be higher than the amount another firm might charge if the Manager determines in good faith that the amount of those commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by the broker. The Manager believes that those research services benefit the Fund by supplementing the information otherwise available to the Manager. That research may also be used by the Manager in servicing other clients. On the other hand, research received by the Manager from brokers effecting portfolio transactions on behalf of its other clients may be used for the Fund’s benefit.

In certain instances, the Manager may specifically allocate brokerage for research services (including research reports on issuers and industries as well as economic and financial data) which may otherwise be purchased for cash. While the receipt of such services has not reduced the Manager’s normal internal research activities, the Manager’s expenses could be materially increased if it were to generate such additional information internally. To the extent such research services are provided by others, the Manager is relieved of expenses it may otherwise incur. In some cases research services are generated by third parties but provided to the Manager by or through broker dealers. Research obtained in this manner may be used in servicing any or all clients of the Manager and may be used in connection with clients other than those client’s whose brokerage commissions are used to acquire the research services described herein. With regard to allocation of brokerage to acquire research services described above, the Manager always considers its best execution obligation when deciding which broker to utilize.

Insofar as Fund transactions result from active management of equity securities, and insofar as Fund transactions result from seeking capital appreciation by selling securities whenever sales are deemed advisable without regard to the length of time the securities may have been held, it may be expected that the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the Fund to brokers (including to Affiliated Brokers) may be greater than if securities were selected solely on a long-term basis.

115

The Fund may, from time to time, loan portfolio securities to broker-dealers affiliated with NB Management (“Affiliated Borrowers”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of an order issued by the SEC. The order exempts such transactions from the provisions of the 1940 Act that would otherwise prohibit these transactions, subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the order, securities loans made by the Fund to Affiliated Borrowers are fully secured by cash collateral. Each loan to an Affiliated Borrower by the Fund will be made on terms at least as favorable to the Fund as comparable loans to unaffiliated borrowers, and no loans will be made to an Affiliated Borrower unless the Affiliated Borrower represents that the terms are at least as favorable to the Fund as those it provides to unaffiliated lenders in comparable transactions. All transactions with Affiliated Borrowers will be reviewed periodically by officers of the Trust and reported to the Board of Trustees.

Expense Offset Arrangement

The Fund has entered into an expense offset arrangement in connection with its custodian contract. For the fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, the impact of this arrangement was a reduction of expenses of $0.

Portfolio Turnover

The Fund’s portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing (1) the lesser of the cost of the securities purchased or the proceeds from the securities sold by the Fund during the fiscal year (other than securities, including options, whose maturity or expiration date at the time of acquisition was one year or less) by (2) the month-end average of the value of such securities owned by the Fund during the fiscal year.

Proxy Voting

The Board of Trustees has delegated to NB Management the responsibility to vote proxies related to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio, as appropriate. Under this authority, NB Management, is required by the Board of Trustees to vote proxies related to portfolio securities in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. The Board of Trustees permits NB Management to contract with a third party to obtain proxy voting and related services, including research of current issues. NB Management has delegated to each Subadviser by contract the responsibility to vote proxies for the Fund’s portfolio securities allocated to such Subadviser in accordance with that Subadviser’s respective proxy voting policies and procedures. For the proxy voting policy of each Subadviser, please see Appendix C.

Each Subadviser has implemented written Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Proxy Voting Policy”) that are designed to reasonably ensure that it votes proxies prudently and in the best interest of its advisory clients for whom it has voting authority, including the Fund. The Proxy Voting Policy of each Subadviser also describes how the Subadviser addresses any conflicts that may arise between its interests and those of its clients with respect to proxy voting.

Subject to the oversight of NB Management, each Subadviser (or a designated proxy committee at the Subadviser) is responsible for developing, authorizing, implementing and updating the Proxy Voting Policy, overseeing the proxy voting process and engaging and

116

overseeing any independent third-party vendors as voting delegate to review, monitor and/or vote proxies. In order to apply the Proxy Voting Policy noted above in a timely and consistent manner, each Subadviser utilizes either Glass, Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis” ) or Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) to vote proxies in accordance with the Subadviser’s voting guidelines.

Each Subadviser’s guidelines adopt the voting recommendations of either Glass Lewis or ISS, respectively. NB Management and the Subadvisers retain final authority and fiduciary responsibility for proxy voting. NB Management and each Subadviser believes that this process is reasonably designed to address material conflicts of interest that may arise between them and a client as to how proxies are voted.

In the event that an investment professional at a Subadviser believes that it is in the best interests of a client or clients to vote proxies in a manner inconsistent with its proxy voting guidelines or in a manner inconsistent with Glass Lewis or ISS recommendations, as applicable, the Subadviser (or a designated proxy committee at the Subadviser) will review information submitted by the investment professional to determine that there is no material conflict of interest between the Subadviser and the client with respect to the voting of the proxy in that manner.

If the Subadviser (or the designated proxy committee at the Subadviser) determines that the voting of a proxy as recommended by the investment professional presents a material conflict of interest between the Subadviser and the client or clients with respect to the voting of the proxy, the Subadviser (or designated committee) shall: (i) take no further action, in which case Glass Lewis or ISS, as applicable, shall vote such proxy in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines or as it recommends; (ii) disclose such conflict to the client or clients and obtain written direction from the client as to how to vote the proxy; (iii) suggest that the client or clients engage another party to determine how to vote the proxy; or (iv) engage another independent third party to determine how to vote the proxy.

Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available, without charge, by calling 1-800-877-9700 (toll-free) or visiting www.nb.com or the website of the SEC, www.sec.gov .

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS DISCLOSURE

Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Policy

The Fund prohibits the disclosure of information about its portfolio holdings, before such information is publicly disclosed, to any outside parties, including individual investors, institutional investors, intermediaries, third party service providers to NB Management or the Fund, rating and ranking organizations, and affiliated persons of the Fund or NB Management (the “Potential Recipients”) unless such disclosure is consistent with the Fund’s legitimate business purposes and is in the best interests of its shareholders (the “Best Interests Standard”).

NB Management and the Fund have determined that the only categories of Potential Recipients that meet the Best Interests Standard are certain mutual fund rating and ranking organizations and third party service providers to NB Management or the Fund with a specific

117

business reason to know the portfolio holdings of the Fund (e.g., securities lending agents) (the “Allowable Recipients”). As such, certain procedures must be adhered to before the Allowable Recipients may receive the portfolio holdings prior to their being made public. Allowable Recipients that get approved for receipt of the portfolio holdings are known as “Approved Recipients.” NB Management may determine to expand the categories of Allowable Recipients only if it is determined that the Best Interests Standard has been met and only with the written concurrence of NB Management’s legal and compliance department. These procedures are designed to address conflicts of interest between the shareholders, on the one hand, and NB Management or any affiliated person of either NB Management or the Fund on the other, by creating a review and approval process of potential recipients of portfolio holdings, which seeks to ensure that disclosure of information about the Fund’s portfolio securities is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders.

Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Procedures

Disclosure of portfolio holdings may be requested by completing and submitting a holdings disclosure form to NB Management’s legal and compliance department or to the Chief Compliance Officer of NB Management for review, approval and processing.

Neither the Fund, NB Management, any Subadviser nor any affiliate of any of them may receive any compensation or consideration for the disclosure of portfolio holdings, although usual and customary compensation may be paid in connection with a service delivered, such as securities lending. Each Allowable Recipient must sign a non-disclosure agreement before they may become an Approved Recipient. Pursuant to a duty of confidentiality set forth in the non-disclosure agreement, Allowable Recipients are (1) required to keep all portfolio holdings information confidential and (2) prohibited from trading based on such information. The Chief Compliance Officer shall report any material issues that may arise under these policies to the Board of Trustees.

Pursuant to Codes of Ethics adopted by the Fund, NB Management and NBAIM, each Subadviser, Investment Personnel, Access Persons and employees of each are prohibited from revealing information relating to current or anticipated investment intentions, portfolio holdings, portfolio transactions or activities of the Fund except to persons whose responsibilities are determined to require knowledge of the information in accordance with procedures established by the Legal and Compliance Department in the best interests of the Fund’s shareholders. The Codes also prohibit any person associated with the Fund, NB Management or NBAIM or a Subadviser, as applicable, in connection with the purchase or sale, directly or indirectly, by such person of a security held or to be acquired by the Fund from engaging in any transaction in a security while in possession of material nonpublic information regarding the security or the issuer of the security.

Portfolio Holdings Approved Recipients

The Fund currently has ongoing arrangements to disclose portfolio holdings information prior to their being made public with the following Approved Recipients:

118

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JP Morgan”) . The Fund has selected JP Morgan as custodian for its securities and cash. Pursuant to a custodian contract, the Fund employs JP Morgan as the custodian of its assets. As custodian, JP Morgan creates and maintains all records relating to the Fund’s activities and supplies the Fund with a daily tabulation of the securities it owns and that are held by JP Morgan. Pursuant to such contract, JP Morgan agrees that all books, records, information and data pertaining to the business of the Fund which are exchanged or received pursuant to the contract shall remain confidential, shall not be voluntarily disclosed to any other person, except as may be required by law, and shall not be used by JP Morgan for any purpose not directly related to the business of the Fund, except with the Fund’s written consent. JP Morgan receives reasonable compensation for its services and expenses as custodian.

J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp. and J.P. Morgan Securities ("JP Morgan Clearing"). The Fund has selected JP Morgan Clearing as the Fund's prime broker. As the prime broker, JP Morgan Clearing creates and maintains records relating to the Fund's short sales, futures contracts, options contracts, or other contracts.

Securities Lending Agent . The Fund has entered into a securities lending agreement with JP Morgan Securities under which JP Morgan Securities acts as a principal borrower or agent to lend securities to entities on JP Morgan Securities’ approved list of borrowers, which includes JP Morgan Securities and its affiliates. The Fund also may enter into securities lending agreements with other entities under which the Fund loans securities to a counterparty acting as a principal borrower or a lending agent. Those principal borrowers or agents may receive the Fund’s portfolio holdings daily. The principal borrower that receives such information is or will be subject to an agreement that all financial, statistical, personal, technical and other data and information related to the Fund’s operations that is designated by the Fund as confidential will be protected from unauthorized use and disclosure by the principal borrower. The Fund may pay a fee for agency and/or administrative services related to its role as lending agent. The Fund also pays the principal borrowers a fee with respect to the cash collateral that it receives and retains the income earned on reinvestment of that cash collateral.

Other Third-Party Service Providers to the Fund . The Fund may also disclose portfolio holdings information prior to their being made public to its independent registered public accounting firms, legal counsel, financial printers, proxy voting firms and other third-party service providers to the Fund who require access to this information to fulfill their duties to the Fund.

In addition, the Fund may disclose portfolio holdings information to third parties that calculate information derived from holdings for use by NB Management and/or NBAIM. Currently, the Fund provides its complete portfolio holdings to Hedgemark Risk Analytics, LLC (“Hedgemark”) each day for this purpose. Hedgemark receives reasonable compensation for its services. FactSet Research Systems Inc. may also receive information and compensation for this purpose.

The Fund may also, from time to time, disclose portfolio holdings information to a proxy solicitation service, Glass Lewis, or to a corporate action service provider, ISS, although they typically receive holdings information after that information is already public.

119

The Fund may also disclose portfolio holdings information to certain service providers of the Subadvisers. Currently, the Fund is providing the portfolio holdings for the portion of the Fund's assets that are subadvised by Visium Asset Management to Morgan Stanley Fund Services, which performs certain administrative services for Visium Asset Management.

In all cases the third-party service provider receiving the information has agreed in writing (or is otherwise required by professional and/or written confidentiality requirements or fiduciary duty) to keep the information confidential, to use it only for the agreed-upon purpose(s) and not to trade securities on the basis of such information.

Rating, Ranking and Research Agencies . The Fund sends its complete portfolio holdings information to the following rating, ranking and research agencies for the purpose of having such agency develop a rating, ranking or specific research product for the Fund. The Fund provides its complete portfolio holdings to: Vestek each day, Lipper, a Reuters company, on the sixth business day of each month, Bloomberg and Morningstar on the sixth business day of each month, with a one month delay (but if the Fund posts its holdings quarterly, it provides its holdings on a quarterly basis) and RiskMetrics on the sixth business day of each month (holdings that are sent are on a two-month delay). The Fund also provides its complete month-end portfolio holdings to Data Communiqué International (“DCI”), a company that provides automated data publishing, printing, and distribution technologies to financial services companies, on the first business day of each following month so that DCI can create a list of the Fund’s top 10 holdings. No compensation is received by the Fund, NB Management, NBAIM, any Subadviser or any other person in connection with the disclosure of this information. NB Management either has or expects to enter shortly into a written confidentiality agreement, with each rating, ranking or research agency in which the agency agrees or will agree to keep the Fund’s portfolio holdings confidential and to use such information only in connection with developing a rating, ranking or research product for the Fund.

REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS

Shareholders of the Fund receive unaudited semi-annual financial statements, as well as year-end financial statements audited by the independent registered public accounting firm for the Fund. The Fund’s statements show the investments owned by it and the market values thereof and provide other information about the Fund and its operations.

ORGANIZATION, CAPITALIZATION AND OTHER MATTERS

The Fund is a separate ongoing series of the Trust, a Delaware statutory trust organized pursuant to an amended and restated Trust Instrument dated as of October 14, 2010. The Trust is registered under the 1940 Act as a diversified, open-end management investment company, commonly known as a mutual fund. The Trust has seven separate operating series (including the Fund). The Fund Trustees may establish additional series or classes of shares without the approval of shareholders. The assets of each series belong only to that series, and the liabilities of each series are borne solely by that series and no other.

Prior to June 1, 2009, the name of the Trust was Lehman Brothers Institutional Liquidity

120

Funds. Prior to October 8, 2010, the name of the Trust was Lehman Brothers Investor Liquidity Series.

Description of Shares . The Fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest (par value $0.001 per share). Shares of the Fund represent equal proportionate interests in the assets of the Fund only and have identical voting, dividend, redemption, liquidation, and other rights except that expenses allocated to a Class may be borne solely by such Class as determined by the Fund Trustees and a Class may have exclusive voting rights with respect to matters affecting only that Class. All shares issued are fully paid and non-assessable, and shareholders have no preemptive or other rights to subscribe to any additional shares.

Shareholder Meetings . The Fund Trustees do not intend to hold annual meetings of shareholders of the Fund. The Fund Trustees will call special meetings of shareholders of the Fund or Class only if required under the 1940 Act or in their discretion or upon the written request of holders of 25% or more of the outstanding shares of the Fund entitled to vote at the meeting.

Certain Provisions of Trust Instrument . Under Delaware law, the shareholders of the Fund will not be personally liable for the obligations of the Fund; a shareholder is entitled to the same limitation of personal liability extended to shareholders of a Delaware corporation. To guard against the risk that Delaware law might not be applied in other states, the Trust Instrument requires that every written obligation of the Trust or the Fund contain a statement that such obligation may be enforced only against the assets of the Trust or Fund and provides for indemnification out of Trust or Fund property of any shareholder nevertheless held personally liable for Trust or Fund obligations, respectively, merely on the basis of being a shareholder.

Other. For Fund shares that can be bought, owned and sold through an account with an Institution, a client of an Institution may be unable to purchase additional shares and/or may be required to redeem shares (and possibly incur a tax liability) if the client no longer has a relationship with the Institution or if the Institution no longer has a contract with NB Management to perform services. Depending on the policies of the Institution involved, an investor may be able to transfer an account from one Institution to another.

CUSTODIAN AND TRANSFER AGENT

The Fund has selected JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 14201 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, TX 75254, as custodian for its securities and cash. State Street serves as the Fund’s transfer and shareholder servicing agent, administering purchases, redemptions, and transfers of Fund shares and the payment of dividends and other distributions through its Boston Service Center. All correspondence should be mailed to Neuberger Berman Funds, Institutional Services, 605 Third Avenue, 2 nd Floor, New York, NY 10158-0180.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Fund has selected Ernst & Young LLP, 200 Clarendon Street, Boston, MA 02116, as the independent registered public accounting firm that will audit its financial statements.

121

LEGAL COUNSEL

The Trust has selected K&L Gates LLP, 1601 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006-1600, as its legal counsel.

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

As of December 20, 2013, the following are all of the beneficial and record owners of five percent or more of a class of the Fund. Except where indicated with an asterisk, the owners listed are record owners. These entities hold these shares of record for the accounts of certain of their clients and have informed the Fund of their policy to maintain the confidentiality of holdings in their client accounts, unless disclosure is expressly required by law.

Class	Name & Address	Percent Owned
Class A	UBS WM USA 1000 Harbor Blvd Weehawken, NJ 07086 Charles Schwab & Co Inc Attn Mutual Funds 101 Montgomery St San Francisco, CA 941014	42.42% 12.25%
Class C	Merrill Lynch Pearce Fenner & Smith Inc. 4800 Deer Lake Dr. E. Jacksonville, FL 32246 UBS WM USA 1000 Harbor Blvd Weehawken, NJ 07086 RBC Capital Markets LLC Attn: Mutual Fund Omnibus Processing 60 S. 6 th Street Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Harborside Financial Center Plaza 2 3 rd Floor Jersey City, NJ 07311	21.95% 20.07% 11.78% 11.30%
Institutional Class	National Financial Services LLC Attn Mutual Funds 200 Liberty St New York, NY 10281 Charles Schwab & Co Inc Attn Mutual Funds 101 Montgomery St San Francisco, CA 941014 JP Morgan Clearing Corp 3 Chase Metrotech Center 3 rd Floor Mutual Fund Department Brooklyn, NY 11245 LPL Financial 9785 Towne Centre Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Harborside Financial Center Plaza 2 3 rd Floor Jersey City, NJ 07311 Merrill Lynch Pearce Fenner & Smith Inc. 4800 Deer Lake Dr. E. Jacksonville, FL 32246	20.00% 19.94% 16.64% 15.83% 7.96% 7.30%

122

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

This SAI and the Prospectus do not contain all the information included in the Trust’s registration statement filed with the SEC under the 1933 Act with respect to the securities offered by the Prospectus. The registration statement, including the exhibits filed therewith, may be examined at the SEC’s offices in Washington, D.C. The SEC maintains a Website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains this SAI, material incorporated by reference, and other information regarding the Fund.

Statements contained in this SAI and in the Prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete. In each instance where reference is made to the copy of any contract or other document a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement is qualified in all respects by such reference.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements and related documents are incorporated herein by reference from the Fund’s Annual Report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012:

The audited financial statements of the Fund and notes thereto, and the reports of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, with respect to such audited financial statements of the Fund.

The following unaudited financial statements and related documents are incorporated herein by reference from the Fund’s Semi-Annual Report to shareholders for the six-month period ended April 30, 2013:

The unaudited financial statements of the Fund, and notes thereto.

123

Appendix A

Long-Term and Short-Term Debt Securities Rating Descriptions

Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) Corporate Long-Term Issue Ratings:

The following descriptions of S&P’s long-term issue ratings have been published by Standard & Poor’s Financial Service LLC.

AAA – An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.

AA – An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree.

The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.

A – An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in

circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong.

BBB – An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

BB, B, CCC, CC, and C – Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.

BB – An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues.

However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

B – An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

CCC – An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

CC – An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment.

A-1

C – A ‘C’ rating is assigned to obligations that are currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, obligations that have payment arrearages allowed by the terms of the documents, or obligations of an issuer that is the subject of a bankruptcy petition or similar action which have not experienced a payment default. Among others, the ‘C’ rating may be assigned to subordinated debt, preferred stock or other obligations on which cash payments have been suspended in accordance with the instrument’s terms or when preferred stock is the subject of a distressed exchange offer, whereby some or all of the issue is either repurchased for an amount of cash or replaced by other instruments having a total value that is less than par.

D – An obligation rated ‘D’ is in payment default. The ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P believes that such payments will be made within five business days, irrespective of any grace period. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized. An obligation's rating is lowered to ‘D’ upon completion of a distressed exchange offer, whereby some or all of the issue is either repurchased for an amount of cash or replaced by other instruments having a total value that is less than par.

Plus (+) or Minus (-) – The ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

NR – This indicates that no rating has been requested, that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that S&P does not rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.’s (“Moody’s”) Long-Term Obligation Ratings :

The following descriptions of Moody’s long-term obligation ratings have been published by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

Aaa – Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality and are subject to the lowest level of credit risk.

Aa – Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.

A – Obligations rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.

Baa – Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and are subject to moderate credit risk, and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.

Ba – Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.

B – Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.

Caa – Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative, of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.

Ca – Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with

A-2

some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.

C – Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.

Modifiers: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.

Fitch Ratings’ (“Fitch”) Corporate Finance Obligations – Long-Term Ratings :

The following descriptions of Fitch’s long-term corporate finance obligation ratings have been published by Fitch, Inc. and Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries.

AAA – Highest credit quality. ‘ AAA ’ ratings denote the lowest expectation of credit risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.

AA – Very high credit quality. ‘ AA ’ ratings denote expectations of very low credit risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.

A – High credit quality. ‘ A ’ ratings denote expectations of low credit risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.

BBB – Good credit quality. ‘ BBB ’ ratings indicate that expectations of credit risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.

BB – Speculative. ‘ BB ’ ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to credit risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial alternatives may be available to allow financial commitments to be met.

B – Highly speculative. ‘ B ’ ratings indicate that material credit risk is present. For performing obligations, default risk is commensurate with the issuer being rated with an Issuer Default Risk (“IDR”) in the ranges ‘BB’ to ‘C’. For issuers with an IDR below ‘B’, the overall credit risk of this obligation is moderated by the expected level of recoveries should a default occur. For issuers with an IDR above ‘B’, the overall credit risk of this obligation is exacerbated by the expected low level of recoveries should a default occur. For non-performing obligations, the obligation or issuer is in default, or has deferred payment, but the rated obligation is expected to have extremely high recovery rates consistent with a Recovery Rating of ‘RR1’ (outstanding recovery prospects given default).

CCC – Substantial credit risk. ‘ CCC ’ ratings indicate that substantial credit risk is present. For performing obligations, default risk is commensurate with an IDR in the ranges ‘B’ to ‘C’. For issuers with an IDR below ‘CCC’, the overall credit risk of this obligation is moderated by the

A-3

expected level of recoveries should a default occur. For issuers with an IDR above ‘CCC’, the overall credit risk of this obligation is exacerbated by the expected low level of recoveries should a default occur. For non-performing obligations, the obligation or issuer is in default, or has deferred payment, but the rated obligation is expected to have a superior recovery rate consistent with a Recovery Rating of ‘RR2’ (superior recovery prospects given default).

CC – Very high levels of credit risk. ‘ CC ’ ratings indicate very high levels of credit risk. For performing obligations, default risk is commensurate with an IDR in the ranges ‘B’ to ‘C’. For issuers with an IDR below ‘CC’, the overall credit risk of this obligation is moderated by the expected level of recoveries should a default occur. For issuers with an IDR above ‘CC’, the overall credit risk of this obligation is exacerbated by the expected low level of recoveries should a default occur. For non-performing obligations, the obligation or issuer is in default, or has deferred payment, but the rated obligation is expected to have a good recovery rate consistent with a Recovery Rating of ‘RR3’ (good recovery prospects given default).

C – Exceptionally high levels of credit risk. ‘ C ’ indicates exceptionally high levels of credit risk. For performing obligations, default risk is commensurate with an IDR in the ranges ‘B’ to ‘C’. The overall credit risk of this obligation is exacerbated by the expected low level of recoveries should a default occur. For non-performing obligations, the obligation or issuer is in default, or has deferred payment, and the rated obligation is expected to have an average, below-average or poor recovery rate consistent with a Recovery Rating of ‘RR4’ (average recovery prospects given default), ‘RR5’ (below average recovery prospects given default) or ‘RR6’ (poor recovery prospects given default).

Defaulted obligations typically are not assigned 'D' ratings, but are instead rated in the 'B' to 'C' rating categories, depending upon their recovery prospects and other relevant characteristics. This approach better aligns obligations that have comparable overall expected loss but varying vulnerability to default and loss.

Plus (+) or Minus (-) The modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA’ obligation rating category, or to corporate finance obligation ratings in the categories below ‘CCC’.

emr – The subscript 'emr' is appended to a rating to denote embedded market risk which is beyond the scope of the rating. The designation is intended to make clear that the rating solely addresses the counterparty risk of the issuing bank. It is not meant to indicate any limitation in the analysis of the counterparty risk, which in all other respects follows published Fitch criteria for analyzing the issuing financial institution. Fitch does not rate these instruments where the principal is to any degree subject to market risk.

DBRS’ Long Term Obligations :

The following descriptions of DBRS’ long-term obligation ratings have been published by Dominion Bond Rating Service.

AAA – Highest credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is exceptionally high and unlikely to be adversely affected by future events.

A-4

AA – Superior credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is considered high. Credit quality differs from AAA only to a small degree. Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable to future events.

A – Good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is substantial, but of lesser credit quality than AA. May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.

BBB – Adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is considered acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.

BB – Speculative, non investment-grade credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is uncertain. Vulnerable to future events.

B – Highly speculative credit quality. There is a high level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet financial obligations.

CCC, CC, C – Very highly speculative credit quality. In danger of defaulting on financial obligations. There is little difference between these three categories, although CC and C ratings are normally applied to obligations that are seen as highly likely to default, or subordinated to obligations rated in the CCC to B range. Obligations in respect of which default has not technically taken place but is considered inevitable may be rated in the C category.

D – A financial obligation has not been met or it is clear that a financial obligation will not be met in the near future or a debt instrument has been subject to a distressed exchange. A downgrade to D may not immediately follow an insolvency or restructuring filing as grace periods or extenuating circumstances may exist.

High or Low – Each rating category is denoted by the subcategories “high” and “low”. The absence of either a “high” or “low” designation indicates the rating is in the “middle” of the category. The AAA and D categories do not utilize “high”, “middle”, and “low” as differential grades.

S&P’s Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings :

The following descriptions of S&P’s short-term issue credit ratings have been published by Standard & Poor’s Financial Service LLC.

A-1 – A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by S&P. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.

A-2 - A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.

A-5

A-3 - A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

B - A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

C - A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

D - A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in payment default. The ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized.

Dual Ratings – S&P assigns “dual” ratings to all debt issues that have a put option or demand feature as part of their structure. The first rating addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as due, and the second rating addresses only the demand feature. The long-term rating symbols are used for bonds to denote the long-term maturity and the short-term rating symbols for the put option (for example, ‘AAA/A-1+’). With U.S. municipal short-term demand debt, note rating symbols are used with the short-term issue credit rating symbols (for example, ‘SP-1+/A-1+’).

Moody’s Short-Term Obligation Ratings :

The following descriptions of Moody’s short-term obligation ratings have been published by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.

P-1 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 have a superior ability to repay short-term debt obligations.

P-2 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations.

P-3 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.

NP - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

Fitch’s Short-Term Obligation Ratings:

The following descriptions of Fitch’s short-term obligation ratings have been published by Fitch

A-6

Inc. and Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries.

F1 - Highest short-term credit quality. Indicates the strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added “+” to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature.

F2 - Good short-term credit quality. Good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments.

F3 - Fair short-term credit quality. The intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate.

B – Speculative short-term credit quality. Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.

C - High short-term default risk. Default is a real possibility.

RD – Restricted default. Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Applicable to entity ratings only.

D – Default. Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.

DBRS Commercial Paper and Short-Term Debt Ratings:

The following descriptions of DBRS’s commercial paper and short-term debt ratings have been published by Dominion Bond Rating Service.

R-1 (high) – Highest credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is exceptionally high. Unlikely to be adversely affected by future events.

R-1 (middle) – Superior credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is very high. Differs from R-1 (high) by a relatively modest degree. Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable to future events.

R-1 (low) – Good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is substantial. Overall strength is not as favourable as higher rating categories. May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.

R-2 (high) – Upper end of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.

R-2 (middle) – Adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events or may be exposed to other factors that could reduce credit quality.

A-7

R-2 (low) – Lower end of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events. A number of challenges are present that could affect the issuer’s ability to meet such obligations.

R-3 – Lowest end of adequate credit quality. There is a capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due. May be vulnerable to future events and the certainty of meeting such obligations could be impacted by a variety of developments.

R-4 – Speculative credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is uncertain.

R-5 – Highly speculative credit quality. There is a high level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet short-term financial obligations as they fall due.

D – A financial obligation has not been met or it is clear that a financial obligation will not be met in the near future, or a debt instrument has been subject to a distressed exchange. A downgrade to D may not immediately follow an insolvency or restructuring filing as grace periods, other procedural considerations, or extenuating circumstance may exist.

A-8

Appendix B

Sales Charge Reductions and Waivers

Reducing your Class A sales charge.

As described in the Class A and Class C Prospectus, there are various ways to reduce your sales charge when purchasing Class A shares. Additional information about Class A sales charge reductions is provided below.

Letter of Intent. By establishing a letter of intent (the “Letter”), you enter into a nonbinding commitment to purchase shares of funds in the fund family over a 13-month period and receive the same sales charge (expressed as a percentage of your purchases) as if all shares had been purchased at once.

The market value of your existing holdings eligible to be aggregated (see below) as of the day immediately before the start of the Letter period may be credited toward satisfying the Letter.

The Letter may be revised upward at any time during the Letter period, and such a revision will be treated as a new Letter, except that the Letter period during which the purchases must be made will remain unchanged. Purchases made from the date of revision will receive the reduced sales charge, if any, resulting from the revised Letter.

The Letter will be considered completed if the shareholder dies within the 13-month Letter period. Commissions to dealers will not be adjusted or paid on the difference between the Letter amount and the amount actually invested before the shareholder’s death.

When a shareholder elects to use a Letter, shares equal to 5% of the dollar amount specified in the Letter may be held in escrow in the shareholder’s account out of the initial purchase (or subsequent purchases, if necessary) by the Fund’s transfer agent. All dividends and capital gain distributions on shares held in escrow will be credited to the shareholder’s account in shares (or paid in cash, if requested). If the intended investment is not completed within the specified Letter period, the purchaser may be required to remit to the Distributor the difference between the sales charge actually paid and the sales charge which would have been paid if the total of such purchases had been made at a single time. Any dealers assigned to the shareholder’s account at the time a purchase was made during the Letter period will receive a corresponding commission adjustment if appropriate. If the difference is not paid by the close of the Letter period, the appropriate number of shares held in escrow will be redeemed to pay such difference. If the proceeds from this redemption are inadequate, the purchaser may be liable to the Distributor for the balance still outstanding.

Shareholders purchasing shares at a reduced sales charge under a Letter indicate their acceptance of these terms and those in the Class A and Class C Prospectus with their first purchase.

B-1

Aggregation. Qualifying investments for aggregation include those made by you and your “immediate family” as defined in the Class A and Class C Prospectus, if all parties are purchasing shares for their own accounts and/or:

	●	individual-type employee benefit plans, such as an IRA, individual 403(b) plan (see exception in “Purchases by certain 403(b) plans” under “Sales Charges”) or single-participant Keogh-type plan;

	●	business accounts solely controlled by you or your immediate family (for example, you own the entire business);

	●	trust accounts established by you or your immediate family (for trusts with only one primary beneficiary, upon the trustor’s death the trust account may be aggregated with such beneficiary’s own accounts; for trusts with multiple primary beneficiaries, upon the trustor’s death the trustees of the trust may instruct the Fund’s transfer agent to establish separate trust accounts for each primary beneficiary; each primary beneficiary’s separate trust account may then be aggregated with such beneficiary’s own accounts);

	●	endowments or foundations established and controlled by you or your immediate family; or

	●	529 accounts, which will be aggregated at the account owner level (Class 529-E accounts may only be aggregated with an eligible employer plan).

Individual purchases by a trustee(s) or other fiduciary(ies) may also be aggregated if the investments are:

	●	for a single trust estate or fiduciary account, including employee benefit plans other than the individual-type employee benefit plans described above;

	●	made for two or more employee benefit plans of a single employer or of affiliated employers as defined in the 1940 Act, excluding the individual-type employee benefit plans described above;

	●	for a diversified common trust fund or other diversified pooled account not specifically formed for the purpose of accumulating Fund shares;

	●	for nonprofit, charitable or educational organizations, or any endowments or foundations established and controlled by such organizations, or any employer-sponsored retirement plans established for the benefit of the employees of such organizations, their endowments, or their foundations; or

	●	for individually established participant accounts of a 403(b) plan that is treated similarly to an employer-sponsored plan for sales charge purposes (see “Purchases by certain 403(b) plans” under “Sales Charges” above), or made for two or more such 403(b) plans that are treated similarly to employer-sponsored plans for sales charge

B-2

purposes, in each case of a single employer or affiliated employers as defined in the 1940 Act.

Purchases made for nominee or street name accounts (securities held in the name of an investment dealer or another nominee such as a bank trust department instead of the customer) may not be aggregated with those made for other accounts and may not be aggregated with other nominee or street name accounts unless otherwise qualified as described above.

Concurrent purchases. As described in the Class A and Class C Prospectus, you may reduce your Class A sales charge by combining purchases of all classes of shares in the funds in the fund family.

Rights of accumulation. Subject to the limitations described in the aggregation policy, you may take into account your accumulated holdings in all share classes of the funds in the fund family to determine your sales charge on investments in accounts eligible to be aggregated. Subject to your investment dealer’s or recordkeeper’s capabilities, your accumulated holdings will be calculated as the higher of (a) the current value of your existing holdings (the “market value”) or (b) the amount you invested (including reinvested dividends and capital gain distributions, but excluding capital appreciation) less any withdrawals (the “cost value”). Depending on the entity on whose books your account is held, the value of your holdings in that account may not be eligible for calculation at cost value. For example, accounts held in nominee or street name may not be eligible for calculation at cost value and instead may be calculated at market value for purposes of rights of accumulation.

You must contact your financial adviser or NB Management if you have additional information that is relevant to the calculation of the value of your holdings.

You may not purchase Class C shares if such combined holdings cause you to be eligible to purchase Class A shares at the $1 million or more sales charge discount rate ( i.e. at net asset value).

If you make a gift of Class A shares, upon your request, you may purchase the shares at the sales charge discount allowed under rights of accumulation of all of your funds in the fund family.

CDSC waivers for Class A and Class C shares.

As noted in the Class A and Class C Prospectus, a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) may be waived in the following cases:

	●	redemptions due to death or post-purchase disability of a shareholder (this generally excludes accounts registered in the names of trusts and other entities). In the case of joint tenant accounts, if one joint tenant dies, a surviving joint tenant, at the time he or she notifies the Fund’s transfer agent of the other joint tenant’s death and removes the decedent’s name from the account, may redeem shares from the account without incurring a CDSC. Redemptions made after the Fund’s transfer agent is notified of the death of a joint tenant will be subject to a CDSC;

B-3

	●	tax-free returns of excess contributions to IRAs;

	●	permitted exchanges of shares, except if shares acquired by exchange are then redeemed within the period during which a contingent deferred sales charge would apply to the initial shares purchased;

	●	distributions from an IRA upon the shareholder’s attainment of age 59-1/2.

In addition, a CDSC may be waived for the following types of transactions, if together they do not exceed 12% of the value of an “account” (defined below) annually (the “12% limit”):

	●	Required minimum distributions taken from retirement accounts upon the shareholder’s attainment of age 70-1/2.

	●	Redemptions through a systematic withdrawal plan (SWP) established directly with a Fund. For each SWP payment, assets that are not subject to a CDSC, such as appreciation on shares and shares acquired through reinvestment of dividends and/or capital gain distributions, will be redeemed first and will count toward the 12% limit. If there is an insufficient amount of assets not subject to a CDSC to cover a particular SWP payment, shares subject to the lowest CDSC will be redeemed next until the 12% limit is reached. Any dividends and/or capital gain distributions taken in cash by a shareholder who receives payments through a SWP will also count toward the 12% limit. In the case of a SWP, the 12% limit is calculated at the time a systematic redemption is first made, and is recalculated at the time each additional systematic redemption is made. Shareholders who establish a SWP should be aware that the amount of a payment not subject to a CDSC may vary over time depending on fluctuations in the value of their accounts. This privilege may be revised or terminated at any time.

	●	Purchases where the Distributor pays no commission or transaction fee to authorized dealers.

For purposes of this paragraph, “account” means:

		in the case of Class A shares, your investment in Class A shares of all funds in the fund family; and

		in the case of Class C shares, your investment in Class C shares of the particular fund from which you are making the redemption.

B-4

CDSC waivers are allowed only in the cases listed here and in the Class A and Class C Prospectus.

B-5

Appendix C

CRAMER ROSENTHAL MCGLYNN LLC

Proxy Voting Policy

In most cases, CRM clients have delegated to the Firm the authority to vote proxies relating to equity securities on their behalf. In exercising its voting obligations, CRM is guided by general fiduciary principles. It must act prudently, solely in the interest of clients, and for the purpose of providing benefits to such clients. The CRM Compliance Committee (the “Compliance Committee”) has determined that these Policies and Procedures for Proxy Voting (these "Policies") are reasonably designed to assure that CRM votes client proxies in the best interest of clients and to provide clients with information about how their proxies are voted. In addition, these Policies are designed to satisfy CRM’s obligations under Rule 206(4)-7 under the Advisers Act.

Proxy Voting Process

CRM’s policy seeks to monitor corporate actions, analyze proxy solicitation materials, and vote client proxies for stocks which are held in client accounts in a timely and appropriate manner. CRM will consider the factors that could affect the value of a Fund’s investment in its determination on a vote. CRM has identified certain significant contributors to shareholder value with respect to a number of common or routine matters that are often the subject of proxy solicitations for shareholder meetings. CRM’s proxy voting procedures address these considerations and establish a framework for its consideration of a vote that would be appropriate for a Fund. In particular, the proxy voting procedures outline principles and factors to be considered in the exercise of voting authority for proposals addressing many common or routine matters.

The Voting Process

Review of Proxy Solicitation Materials/Independent Recommendations

CRM receives proxy materials through an independent third party, Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”). ISS provides analyses and voting recommendations based on empirical research measuring the impact of proxy issues on shareholder value. ISS’s voting recommendations cover three categories: (i) voting recommendations for social and environmental shareholder proposals; (ii) voting recommendations for “Taft-Hartley” accounts that are in the best long-term economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries conforming to AFL-CIO voting guidelines; 1 and (iii) voting recommendations intended to generally maximize shareholder value.

1 CRM receives an analysis intended to protect plan assets as required by the U.S. Department of Labor and the Employees Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”).

C-1

In determining how to vote on a proxy issue, CRM will consider ISS analysis and recommendations, as well as the portfolio manager’s own knowledge of the company (including its management, operations, industry and the particular proxy issue) in rendering a decision, with the exception of separately-managed Taft-Hartley or accounts where the client specifically directs CRM to vote in a “socially responsible” manner; in these cases CRM would generally follow the particular ISS recommendations for that category.

ISS Standard Proxy Voting Guidelines Summary

The following is a summary of the ISS Standard Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Guidelines), which form the substantive basis of CRM’s Policy on Proxy Voting. 2 As described above, CRM may diverge from the Guidelines and a related ISS recommendation on any particular proxy vote or in connection with any individual investment decision.

Auditors

Vote for proposals to ratify auditors, unless any of the following apply:

	•	An auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is therefore not independent.
	•	Fees for non-audit services are excessive, or
	•	There is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion which is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position.

Board of Directors

Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections

Votes on director nominees should be made on a case-by-case basis, examining: independence of the board and key board committees, attendance at board meetings, corporate governance provisions and takeover activity, long-term company performance, responsiveness to shareholder proposals, any egregious board actions, and any excessive non-audit fees or other potential auditor conflicts.

Classification/Declassification of the Board

Vote against proposals to classify the board. Vote for proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect all directors annually.

Independent Chairman (Separate Chairman/CEO)

Vote on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals requiring that the positions of chairman and CEO be held separately. Because some companies have governance structures in place that counterbalance a combined position, certain factors should be considered in determining whether

2 The full ISS recommendations are outlined in the ISS Proxy Guidelines, which are available to CRM clients upon request

C-2

the proposal warrants support. These factors include the presence of a lead director, board and committee independence, governance guidelines, company performance, and annual review by outside directors of CRO pay.

Majority of Independent Directors/Establishment of Committees

Vote for shareholder proposals asking that a majority or more of directors be independent unless the board composition already meets the proposed threshold by ISS’s definition of independence.

Vote for shareholder proposals asking that board audit, compensation, and/or nominating committees be composed exclusively of independent directors if they currently do not meet that standard.

Shareholder Rights

Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent

Vote against proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to take action by written consent.

Vote for proposals to allow or make shareholder action by written consent.

Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meeting

Vote against proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to call special meetings.

Vote for proposals that remove restrictions on the right of shareholder to act independently of management.

Supermajority Vote Requirements

Vote against proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote.

Vote for proposals to lower supermajority vote requirements.

Cumulative Voting

Vote against proposals to eliminate cumulating voting.

Vote proposals to restore or permit cumulative voting on a case-by-case basis relative to the company’s other governance provisions.

Confidential Voting

Vote for shareholder proposals requesting that corporations adopt confidential voting, use independent vote tabulators and use independent inspector of election, as long as the proposal includes a provision for proxy contents as follows: IN the case of a contested election,

C-3

management should be permitted to request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy. If the dissidents agree, the policy remains in place. If the dissidents will not agree, the confidential voting policy is waived.

Vote for management proposals to adopt confidential voting.

Proxy Contests

Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections

Votes in a contested election of directors must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, considering the factors that include the long-term financial performance, management’s track record, qualification of director nominees (both slates), and an evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders.

Reimbursing Proxy Solicitation Expenses

Vote case-by-case. Where ISS recommends in favor of the dissidents, ISS also recommends voting for reimbursing proxy solicitation expenses.

Poison Pills

Vote for shareholder proposals that ask a company to submit its poison pill for shareholder ratification. Review on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals to redeem a company’s poison pill and management proposals to ratify a poison pill.

Mergers and Corporate Restructurings

Vote case-by-case on mergers and corporate restructurings based on such features as the fairness opinion, pricing, strategic rationale, and the negotiating process.

Reincorporation Proposals

Proposals to change a company’s state of incorporation should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, giving consideration to both financial and corporate governance concerns, including the reasons for reincorporating, a comparison of the governance provisions, and a comparison of the jurisdictional laws. Vote for reincorporation when the economic factors outweigh any neutral or negative governance changes.

Capital Structure

Common Stock Authorization

Votes on proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance are determined on a case-by-case basis using a model developed by ISS. Vote against proposals at companies with dual-class capital structures to increase the number of authorized shares of the

C-4

class of stock that has superior voting rights. Vote for proposals to approve increases beyond the allowable increase when a company’s shares are in danger of being de-listed or if a company’s ability to continue to operate as a going concern is uncertain.

Preferred Stock

Vote against proposals authorizing the creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend distribution and other rights (“blank check” preferred stock). Vote for proposals to create “declawed” blank check preferred stock (stock that cannot be used as a takeover defense).

Management Compensation

Director Compensation

Votes on compensation plans for directors are determined on a case-by-case basis, using a proprietary, quantitative model developed by ISS.

Employee, Stock Purchase Plans

Votes on employee stock purchase plans should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Shareholder Proposals regarding Executive and Director Pay

Generally, vote for shareholder proposals seeking additional disclosure of executive and director pay information, provided the information requested is relevant to shareholders’ needs, and would not put the company at a competitive disadvantage relative to its industry, and is not unduly burdensome to the company. Vote on a case-by-case basis for all other shareholder proposals regarding executive and director pay, taking into account company performance, pay level versus peers, pay level versus industry, and long term corporate outlook.

Management Proposals Seeking Approval to Reprice Options

Votes on management proposals seeking to reprice options are evaluated on a case-by-case basis giving consideration to: historic trading patterns rationale for repricing, value-for-value exchange, options vesting, term of the options, exercise price, and participation.

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

Votes on employee stock purchase plans should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Shareholder Proposals on Compensation

Vote on a case-by-case basis for all other shareholder proposals regarding executive and director pay, taking into account company performance, pay level versus peers, pay level versus industry, and long-term corporate outlook.

C-5

Social and Environmental Issues

These issues cover a wide range of topics, including consumer and public safety, environment and energy, general corporate issues, labor standards and human rights, military business and workplace diversity. In general, vote case-by-case. While a wide variety of factors are considered, the primary focus is on how the proposal will enhance the economic value of the company.

Securities on Loan

Securities over which CRM has voting authority in certain accounts are subject to being lent to other parties, including securities in private investment partnerships, registered mutual funds and certain other accounts. CRM has no role in the lending process; securities lending decisions are made by the custodian with the consent of and on behalf of the client. As a general matter, when a security is on “loan” as of the record date, CRM has no authority to vote, and shall not vote, a proxy for the security.

Clients Who Vote Their Own Proxies

CRM clients may retain the authority to vote their own proxies in their discretion.

Conflicts and Potential Conflicts of Interest

CRM’s proxy voting procedures establish a protocol for voting of proxies in cases in which it may have a potential conflict of interest arising from, among other things, a direct business relationship or financial interest in a company soliciting proxies. When a conflict or potential conflict has been identified, CRM will generally vote the proxy as recommended by ISS, subject to a review by the CRM Compliance Committee indicating the nature of the potential conflict of interest and how the determination of such vote was achieved.

Disclosure

CRM, in its written brochure required under Rule 204-3 (the “Form ADV”) shall describe: (i) these Policies; (ii) how a client can obtain information from CRM on how it voted the client’s proxies; and (iii) how a client can obtain a copy of these Policies and/or the ISS Proxy Voting Guidelines.

Recordkeeping

CRM shall retain the following books and records in, as appropriate, electronic or hard copy form: (i) a copy of each proxy statement received regarding client securities (which may be kept by relying on obtaining copies through the EDGAR system maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission), (ii) a record of each vote cast on behalf of clients, (iii) internal documents created that were material to the decision on how to vote any proxies or that memorialize the basis for such a decision, including any documentation relating to decisions to

C-6

vote proxies other than in accordance with ISS recommendations, (iv) copies of written client requests for proxy voting records and of the Firm’s written responses to either a written or oral request for information on how the Firm voted proxies on behalf of the requesting client, and (v) with respect to votes cast for securities held in any registered investment company, records of CUSIP numbers.

Records for the CRM Mutual Fund Trust shall be recorded and maintained by the Trust.

The above records shall be retained in an easily accessible place for a period of at least five (5) years from the end for the fiscal year during which the last entry was made on such record, the first two years in an appropriate office of CRM

C-7

SECTION HH

The Voting of Proxies on Behalf of Clients

Rules 204(4)-2 and 204-2 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 30b1-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 require investment advisers to adopt written policies and procedures governing the voting of proxies on behalf of their clients.

These procedures will be used by GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Gabelli Funds, LLC, Gabelli Securities, Inc., and Teton Advisors, Inc. (collectively, the “Advisers”) to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities held by their clients, including the procedures that the Advisers use when a vote presents a conflict between the interests of the shareholders of an investment company managed by one of the Advisers, on the one hand, and those of the Advisers; the principal underwriter; or any affiliated person of the investment company, the Advisers, or the principal underwriter. These procedures will not apply where the Advisers do not have voting discretion or where the Advisers have agreed to with a client to vote the client’s proxies in accordance with specific guidelines or procedures supplied by the client (to the extent permitted by ERISA).

I. Proxy Voting Committee

The Proxy Voting Committee was originally formed in April 1989 for the purpose of formulating guidelines and reviewing proxy statements within the parameters set by the substantive proxy voting guidelines originally published in 1988 and updated periodically, a copy of which are appended as Exhibit A. The Committee will include representatives of Research, Administration, Legal, and the Advisers. Additional or replacement members of the Committee will be nominated by the Chairman and voted upon by the entire Committee.

Meetings are held on an as needed basis to form views on the manner in which the Advisers should vote proxies on behalf of their clients.

In general, the Director of Proxy Voting Services, using the Proxy Guidelines, recommendations of Institutional Shareholder Corporate Governance Service (“ISS”), other third-party services and the analysts of Gabelli & Company, Inc., will determine how to vote on each issue. For non-controversial matters, the Director of Proxy Voting Services may vote the proxy if the vote is: (1) consistent with the recommendations of the issuer's Board of Directors and not contrary to the Proxy Guidelines; (2) consistent with the recommendations of the issuer's Board of Directors and is a non-controversial issue not covered by the Proxy Guidelines; or (3) the vote is contrary to the recommendations of the Board of Directors but is consistent with the Proxy Guidelines. In those instances, the Director of Proxy Voting Services or the Chairman of the Committee may sign and date the proxy statement indicating how each issue will be voted.

C-8

All matters identified by the Chairman of the Committee, the Director of Proxy Voting Services or the Legal Department as controversial, taking into account the recommendations of ISS or other third party services and the analysts of Gabelli & Company, Inc., will be presented to the Proxy Voting Committee. If the Chairman of the Committee, the Director of Proxy Voting Services or the Legal Department has identified the matter as one that (1) is controversial; (2) would benefit from deliberation by the Proxy Voting Committee; or (3) may give rise to a conflict of interest between the Advisers and their clients, the Chairman of the Committee will initially determine what vote to recommend that the Advisers should cast and the matter will go before the Committee.

A. Conflicts of Interest.

The Advisers have implemented these proxy voting procedures in order to prevent conflicts of interest from influencing their proxy voting decisions. By following the Proxy Guidelines, as well as the recommendations of ISS, other third-party services and the analysts of Gabelli & Company, the Advisers are able to avoid, wherever possible, the influence of potential conflicts of interest. Nevertheless, circumstances may arise in which one or more of the Advisers are faced with a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest in connection with its vote. In general, a conflict of interest may arise when an Adviser knowingly does business with an issuer, and may appear to have a material conflict between its own interests and the interests of the shareholders of an investment company managed by one of the Advisers regarding how the proxy is to be voted. A conflict also may exist when an Adviser has actual knowledge of a material business arrangement between an issuer and an affiliate of the Adviser.

In practical terms, a conflict of interest may arise, for example, when a proxy is voted for a company that is a client of one of the Advisers, such as GAMCO Asset Management Inc. A conflict also may arise when a client of one of the Advisers has made a shareholder proposal in a proxy to be voted upon by one or more of the Advisers. The Director of Proxy Voting Services, together with the Legal Department, will scrutinize all proxies for these or other situations that may give rise to a conflict of interest with respect to the voting of proxies.

B. Operation of Proxy Voting Committee

For matters submitted to the Committee, each member of the Committee will receive, prior to the meeting, a copy of the proxy statement, any relevant third party research, a summary of any views provided by the Chief Investment Officer and any recommendations by Gabelli & Company, Inc. analysts. The Chief Investment Officer or the Gabelli & Company, Inc. analysts may be invited to present their viewpoints. If the

C-9

Director of Proxy Voting Services or the Legal Department believe that the matter before the committee is one with respect to which a conflict of interest may exist between the Advisers and their clients, counsel will provide an opinion to the Committee concerning the conflict. If the matter is one in which the interests of the clients of one or more of the Advisers may diverge, counsel will so advise and the Committee may make different recommendations as to different clients. For any matters where the recommendation may trigger appraisal rights, counsel will provide an opinion concerning the likely risks and merits of such an appraisal action.

Each matter submitted to the Committee will be determined by the vote of a majority of the members present at the meeting. Should the vote concerning one or more recommendations be tied in a vote of the Committee, the Chairman of the Committee will cast the deciding vote. The Committee will notify the proxy department of its decisions and the proxies will be voted accordingly.

Although the Proxy Guidelines express the normal preferences for the voting of any shares not covered by a contrary investment guideline provided by the client, the Committee is not bound by the preferences set forth in the Proxy Guidelines and will review each matter on its own merits. Written minutes of all Proxy Voting Committee meetings will be maintained. The Advisers subscribe to ISS, which supplies current information on companies, matters being voted on, regulations, trends in proxy voting and information on corporate governance issues.

If the vote cast either by the analyst or as a result of the deliberations of the Proxy Voting Committee runs contrary to the recommendation of the Board of Directors of the issuer, the matter will be referred to legal counsel to determine whether an amendment to the most recently filed Schedule 13D is appropriate.

II. Social Issues and Other Client Guidelines

If a client has provided special instructions relating to the voting of proxies, they should be noted in the client’s account file and forwarded to the proxy department. This is the responsibility of the investment professional or sales assistant for the client. In accordance with Department of Labor guidelines, the Advisers’ policy is to vote on behalf of ERISA accounts in the best interest of the plan participants with regard to social issues that carry an economic impact. Where an account is not governed by ERISA, the Advisers will vote shares held on behalf of the client in a manner consistent with any individual investment/voting guidelines provided by the client. Otherwise the Advisers will abstain with respect to those shares.

C-10

III. Client Retention of Voting Rights

If a client chooses to retain the right to vote proxies or if there is any change in voting authority, the following should be notified by the investment professional or sales assistant for the client.

	-	Operations
	-	Proxy Department
	-	Investment professional assigned to the account

In the event that the Board of Directors (or a Committee thereof) of one or more of the investment companies managed by one of the Advisers has retained direct voting control over any security, the Proxy Voting Department will provide each Board Member (or Committee member) with a copy of the proxy statement together with any other relevant information including recommendations of ISS or other third-party services.

IV. Proxies of Certain Non-U.S. Issuers

Proxy voting in certain countries requires “share-blocking.” Shareholders wishing to vote their proxies must deposit their shares shortly before the date of the meeting with a designated depository. During the period in which the shares are held with a depository, shares that will be voted at the meeting cannot be sold until the meeting has taken place and the shares are returned to the clients’ custodian. Absent a compelling reason to the contrary, the Advisers believe that the benefit to the client of exercising the vote is outweighed by the cost of voting and therefore, the Advisers will not typically vote the securities of non-U.S. issuers that require share-blocking.

In addition, voting proxies of issuers in non-US markets may also give rise to a number of administrative issues to prevent the Advisers from voting such proxies. For example, the Advisers may receive the notices for shareholder meetings without adequate time to consider the proposals in the proxy or after the cut-off date for voting. Other markets require the Advisers to provide local agents with power of attorney prior to implementing their respective voting instructions on the proxy. Although it is the Advisers’ policies to vote the proxies for its clients for which they have proxy voting authority, in the case of issuers in non-US markets, we vote client proxies on a best efforts basis.

V. Voting Records

The Proxy Voting Department will retain a record of matters voted upon by the Advisers for their clients. The Advisers will supply information on how they voted a client’s proxy upon request from the client.

The complete voting records for each registered investment company (the “Fund”) that is managed by the Advisers will be filed on Form N-PX for the twelve months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. A description of the

C-11

Fund’s proxy voting policies, procedures, and how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by (i) calling 800- GABELLI (800-422-3554); (ii) writing to Gabelli Funds, LLC at One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580-1422; or (iii) visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov . Question should we post the proxy voting records for the funds on the website.

The Advisers’ proxy voting records will be retained in compliance with Rule 204-2 under the Investment Advisers Act.

VI. Voting Procedures

1. Custodian banks, outside brokerage firms and clearing firms are responsible for forwarding proxies directly to the Advisers.

Proxies are received in one of two forms:

	●	Shareholder Vote Instruction Forms (“VIFs”) - Issued by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”). Broadridge is an outside service contracted by the various institutions to issue proxy materials.
	●	Proxy cards which may be voted directly.

2. Upon receipt of the proxy, the number of shares each form represents is logged into the proxy system, electronically or manually, according to security.

3. Upon receipt of instructions from the proxy committee (see Administrative), the votes are cast and recorded for each account on an individual basis.

Records have been maintained on the Proxy Edge system.

Proxy Edge records include:

	Security Name and Cusip Number
	Date and Type of Meeting (Annual, Special, Contest)
	Client Name
	Adviser or Fund Account Number
	Directors’ Recommendation
	How the Adviser voted for the client on item

4. VIFs are kept alphabetically by security. Records for the current proxy season are located in the Proxy Voting Department office. In preparation for the upcoming season, files are transferred to an offsite storage facility during January/February.

5. If a proxy card or VIF is received too late to be voted in the conventional matter, every attempt is made to vote including:

C-12

	●	When a solicitor has been retained, the solicitor is called. At the solicitor’s direction, the proxy is faxed.
	●	In some circumstances VIFs can be faxed to Broadridge up until the time of the meeting.

6. In the case of a proxy contest, records are maintained for each opposing entity.

7. Voting in Person

a) At times it may be necessary to vote the shares in person. In this case, a “legal proxy” is obtained in the following manner:

●	Banks and brokerage firms using the services at Broadridge:
	Broadridge is notified that we wish to vote in person. Broadridge issues individual legal proxies and sends them back via email or overnight (or the Adviser can pay messenger charges). A lead-time of at least two weeks prior to the meeting is needed to do this. Alternatively, the procedures detailed below for banks not using Broadridge may be implemented.
●	Banks and brokerage firms issuing proxies directly:

The bank is called and/or faxed and a legal proxy is requested.

All legal proxies should appoint:

“Representative of [Adviser name] with full power of substitution.”

b) The legal proxies are given to the person attending the meeting along with the limited power of attorney.

C-13

Appendix A

Proxy Guidelines

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

General Policy Statement

It is the policy of GAMCO Investors, Inc, and its affiliated advisers (collectively “the Advisers”) to vote in the best economic interests of our clients. As we state in our Magna Carta of Shareholders Rights, established in May 1988, we are neither for nor against management. We are for shareholders.

At our first proxy committee meeting in 1989, it was decided that each proxy statement should be evaluated on its own merits within the framework first established by our Magna Carta of Shareholders Rights. The attached guidelines serve to enhance that broad framework.

We do not consider any issue routine. We take into consideration all of our research on the company, its directors, and their short and long-term goals for the company. In cases where issues that we generally do not approve of are combined with other issues, the negative aspects of the issues will be factored into the evaluation of the overall proposals but will not necessitate a vote in opposition to the overall proposals.

Board of Directors

We do not consider the election of the Board of Directors a routine issue. Each slate of directors is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Factors taken into consideration include:

●	Historical responsiveness to shareholders
		This may include such areas as:
		-Paying greenmail
		-Failure to adopt shareholder resolutions receiving a majority of shareholder votes
●	Qualifications
●	Nominating committee in place
●	Number of outside directors on the board
●	Attendance at meetings
●	Overall performance

C-14

Selection of Auditors

In general, we support the Board of Directors’ recommendation for auditors.

Blank Check Preferred Stock

We oppose the issuance of blank check preferred stock.

Blank check preferred stock allows the company to issue stock and establish dividends, voting rights, etc. without further shareholder approval.

Classified Board

A classified board is one where the directors are divided into classes with overlapping terms. A different class is elected at each annual meeting.

While a classified board promotes continuity of directors facilitating long range planning, we feel directors should be accountable to shareholders on an annual basis. We will look at this proposal on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the board’s historical responsiveness to the rights of shareholders.

Where a classified board is in place we will generally not support attempts to change to an annually elected board.

When an annually elected board is in place, we generally will not support attempts to classify the board.

Increase Authorized Common Stock

The request to increase the amount of outstanding shares is considered on a case-by-case basis.

Factors taken into consideration include:

●	Future use of additional shares
		-Stock split
		-Stock option or other executive compensation plan
		-Finance growth of company/strengthen balance sheet
		-Aid in restructuring
		-Improve credit rating
		-Implement a poison pill or other takeover defense
●	Amount of stock currently authorized but not yet issued or reserved for stock option plans

C-15

●	Amount of additional stock to be authorized and its dilutive effect

We will support this proposal if a detailed and verifiable plan for the use of the additional shares is contained in the proxy statement.

Confidential Ballot

We support the idea that a shareholder’s identity and vote should be treated with confidentiality.

However, we look at this issue on a case-by-case basis.

In order to promote confidentiality in the voting process, we endorse the use of independent Inspectors of Election.

Cumulative Voting

In general, we support cumulative voting.

Cumulative voting is a process by which a shareholder may multiply the number of directors being elected by the number of shares held on record date and cast the total number for one candidate or allocate the voting among two or more candidates.

Where cumulative voting is in place, we will vote against any proposal to rescind this shareholder right.

Cumulative voting may result in a minority block of stock gaining representation on the board. When a proposal is made to institute cumulative voting, the proposal will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. While we feel that each board member should represent all shareholders, cumulative voting provides minority shareholders an opportunity to have their views represented.

Director Liability and Indemnification

We support efforts to attract the best possible directors by limiting the liability and increasing the indemnification of directors, except in the case of insider dealing.

C-16

Equal Access to the Proxy

The SEC’s rules provide for shareholder resolutions. However, the resolutions are limited in scope and there is a 500 word limit on proponents’ written arguments. Management has no such limitations. While we support equal access to the proxy, we would look at such variables as length of time required to respond, percentage of ownership, etc.

Fair Price Provisions

Charter provisions requiring a bidder to pay all shareholders a fair price are intended to prevent two-tier tender offers that may be abusive. Typically, these provisions do not apply to board-approved transactions.

We support fair price provisions because we feel all shareholders should be entitled to receive the same benefits.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Golden Parachutes

Golden parachutes are severance payments to top executives who are terminated or demoted after a takeover.

We support any proposal that would assure management of its own welfare so that they may continue to make decisions in the best interest of the company and shareholders even if the decision results in them losing their job. We do not, however, support excessive golden parachutes. Therefore, each proposal will be decided on a case-by- case basis.

Note: Congress has imposed a tax on any parachute that is more than three times the executive’s average annual compensation

Anti-Greenmail Proposals

We do not support greenmail. An offer extended to one shareholder should be extended to all shareholders equally across the board.

C-17

Limit Shareholders’ Rights to Call Special Meetings

We support the right of shareholders to call a special meeting.

Consideration of Nonfinancial Effects of a Merger

This proposal releases the directors from only looking at the financial effects of a merger and allows them the opportunity to consider the merger’s effects on employees, the community, and consumers.

As a fiduciary, we are obligated to vote in the best economic interests of our clients. In general, this proposal does not allow us to do that. Therefore, we generally cannot support this proposal.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Mergers, Buyouts, Spin-Offs, Restructurings

Each of the above is considered on a case-by-case basis. According to the Department of Labor, we are not required to vote for a proposal simply because the offering price is at a premium to the current market price. We may take into consideration the long term interests of the shareholders.

Military Issues

Shareholder proposals regarding military production must be evaluated on a purely economic set of criteria for our ERISA clients. As such, decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis.

In voting on this proposal for our non-ERISA clients, we will vote according to the client’s direction when applicable. Where no direction has been given, we will vote in the best economic interests of our clients. It is not our duty to impose our social judgment on others.

Northern Ireland

Shareholder proposals requesting the signing of the MacBride principles for the purpose of countering the discrimination of Catholics in hiring practices must be evaluated on a purely economic set of criteria for our ERISA clients. As such, decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis.

C-18

In voting on this proposal for our non-ERISA clients, we will vote according to client direction when applicable. Where no direction has been given, we will vote in the best economic interests of our clients. It is not our duty to impose our social judgment on others.

Opt Out of State Anti-Takeover Law

This shareholder proposal requests that a company opt out of the coverage of the state’s takeover statutes. Example: Delaware law requires that a buyer must acquire at least 85% of the company’s stock before the buyer can exercise control unless the board approves.

We consider this on a case-by-case basis. Our decision will be based on the following:

●	State of Incorporation
●	Management history of responsiveness to shareholders
●	Other mitigating factors

Poison Pill

In general, we do not endorse poison pills.

In certain cases where management has a history of being responsive to the needs of shareholders and the stock is very liquid, we will reconsider this position.

Reincorporation

Generally, we support reincorporation for well-defined business reasons. We oppose reincorporation if proposed solely for the purpose of reincorporating in a state with more stringent anti-takeover statutes that may negatively impact the value of the stock.

Stock Incentive Plans

Director and Employee Stock incentive plans are an excellent way to attract, hold and motivate directors and employees. However, each incentive plan must be evaluated on its own merits, taking into consideration the following:

●	Dilution of voting power or earnings per share by more than 10%.
●	Kind of stock to be awarded, to whom, when and how much.
●	Method of payment.

C-19

●	Amount of stock already authorized but not yet issued under existing stock plans.
●	The successful steps taken by management to maximize shareholder value.

Supermajority Vote Requirements

Supermajority vote requirements in a company’s charter or bylaws require a level of voting approval in excess of a simple majority of the outstanding shares. In general, we oppose supermajority-voting requirements. Supermajority requirements often exceed the average level of shareholder participation. We support proposals’ approvals by a simple majority of the shares voting.

Limit Shareholders Right to Act by Written Consent

Written consent allows shareholders to initiate and carry on a shareholder action without having to wait until the next annual meeting or to call a special meeting. It permits action to be taken by the written consent of the same percentage of the shares that would be required to effect proposed action at a shareholder meeting.

Reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Say on Pay and Say When on Pay

We will generally abstain from advisory votes on executive compensation (Say on Pay) and will also abstain from advisory votes on the frequency of voting on executive compensation (Say When on Pay) and will also abstain on advisory votes relating to extraordinary transaction executive compensation (Say on Golden Parachutes). In those instances when we believe that it is in our clients’ best interest, we may cast a vote for or against executive compensation and/or the frequency of votes on executive compensation and/or extraordinary transaction executive compensation advisory votes.

C-20

Good Hill Partners LP

Proxy Voting Policy

Primarily, Good Hill offers investment advice on fixed income securities, including, but not limited to, asset-backed securities (“ABS”), mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and on credit default swaps (“CDS”) and total return swaps (“TRS”). To a lesser extent, and for hedging purposes, Good Hill also offers advice on both exchange traded and over-the-counter equity securities, commercial paper, United States government securities, and options contracts. Typically, Good Hill does not manage securities that require voting proxies on behalf of clients.

The Proxy Voting Policy applies to securities where Good Hill could pursue other investment strategies or obtain public equity securities as a result of a “restructuring” and have the authority to vote proxies and respond to all corporate actions for securities held in Good Hill’s client accounts. In the event that Good Hill provides investment advisory services where the securities held require a proxy vote or holds equity securities positions that require a proxy vote, Good Hill shall exercise such voting rights and monitor such corporate actions in accordance with the terms of the client contacts and Good Hill Policies and Procedures for Voting Proxies for Clients (the "Proxy Voting Procedures"), pursuant to Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act 1 , which is attached hereto as Appendix H.

1 Rule 206(4)-6 of Advisers Act requires a registered investment adviser who exercises proxy voting authority over client securities to: (i) adopt and implement written policies and procedures designed to ensure that the adviser votes proxies in the best interest of its clients; (ii) describe its proxy voting procedures to clients and provide copies of such procedures on request; and (iii) disclose to clients how they may obtain information on how the adviser voted their proxies. An adviser’s proxy voting policy should also include procedures for the resolution of material conflicts of interest with its clients. Additionally, Rule 204-2 of the Advisers Act requires advisers to retain: (i) their proxy voting policies and procedures; (ii) proxy statements received regarding client securities; (iii) records of written client requests for proxy voting information; (iv) records of votes cast on behalf of clients; and (v) any documents prepared by the adviser that were material to making a decision on how to vote or memorialized the basis of such decision.

C-21

APPENDIX H

GOOD HILL PARTNERS LP

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR VOTING PROXIES FOR CLIENTS

Good Hill Partners LP (“Good Hill”) has a responsibility to analyze the issues connected with shareholder votes, evaluate the probable impact on corporate operations and vote proxies in what it views to be the best interests of its clients. This duty arises from the fact that an investment adviser’s proxy votes can affect the outcome of a shareholder vote and, consequently, the value of the securities held by its clients. Therefore, in accordance with the requirements of Rule 206(4)–6 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as Amended (the “Advisers Act”) and the general fiduciary responsibilities associated with acting in the capacity of investment adviser, Good Hill has adopted these Proxy Policies and Procedures.

VOTING PROCEDURES

Authority to Vote. In cases where Good Hill has accepted or is legally obligated to vote proxies on behalf of a client, Good Hill will vote proxies consistent with Rule 206(4)-6 of the Advisers Act and its fiduciary duties as an investment adviser.

Conflicts of Interest. The Chief Compliance Officer with the assistance of the Chief Operating Officer is responsible for determining whether Good Hill has a conflict of interest which would affect the proxies being voted. If a conflict is found to exist, Good Hill will not vote the proxies and will refer the matter to its clients and recommend that they vote the proxies themselves. However, given the lack of affiliations, it is expected that majority of all proxies will be voted by Good Hill.

What constitutes a conflict of interest for proxy-voting purposes will be determined by the Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer will deem a conflict to exist whenever Good Hill or its affiliates have a personal or business interest in the outcome of a particular matter before shareholders. A conflict would arise, for example, in any case where Good Hill or any of its affiliates had a business or financial relationship with a company whose management or shareholders were soliciting proxies. Another example of a conflict of interest would be where principal officers of Good Hill or its affiliates were related to an incumbent director or a candidate seeking a seat on the board. Putative conflicts deemed by the Chief Compliance Officer to be immaterial to a shareholder vote will not disable Good Hill from voting proxies.

The Chief Compliance Officer will presume the existence of a conflict of interest for proxy-voting purposes whenever:

●

a current client is affiliated with a company soliciting proxies and has communicated its view to Good Hill on an impending proxy vote; or

C-22

	●	Good Hill or any one if its affiliates has identified a personal or business interest either in a company soliciting proxies or in the outcome of a shareholder vote; or

	●	a third-party with an interest in the outcome of a shareholder vote has attempted to influence Good Hill or any of its affiliates.

Client Elections. Assuming no conflict of interest exists, if a client who has authorized Good Hill to vote proxies on its behalf nevertheless instructs Good Hill to vote its proxy in a fashion different from Good Hill’s recommendation with respect to such vote, Good Hill will vote the proxy in accordance with the client’s written instructions.

Record-Keeping. Good Hill will, for a period of at least five years, maintain or have ready access to the following documents:

	●	a copy of the current Proxy Policies and Procedures.

	●	a copy of each proxy statement received regarding securities held on behalf of its clients (which may be obtained from the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system).

	●	a record of each vote cast on behalf of clients.

	●	a copy of any document created by Good Hill that was material to a proxy vote on behalf of clients.

	●	a copy of each written request received from a client as to how Good Hill voted proxies on its behalf and a copy of any written response from Good Hill to any oral or written client request for information as to how Good Hill voted proxies on its behalf and a copy of any written response from Good Hill to any oral or written client request for information as to how Good Hill voted proxies on its behalf.

Disclosure to Clients. Good Hill will include a summary of its Proxy Policies and Procedures in Part 2A of Good Hill Form ADV. A copy of the Proxy Policies and Procedures will also be made available to any client upon request. All clients will be provided with a contact at Good Hill from whom they may obtain the proxy-voting records with respect to the securities held in their accounts.

C-23

LAZARD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

Proxy Voting

Policy:

As a fiduciary, LAM is obligated to vote proxies in the best interests of its clients. LAM has adopted a written policy (the "Policy") that is designed to ensure that it satisfies its fiduciary obligation. LAM has developed a structure to attempt to ensure that proxy voting is conducted in an appropriate manner, consistent with clients' best interests, and within the framework of the Policy.

LAM manages assets for a variety of clients, including individuals, Taft-Hartley plans, governmental plans, foundations and endowments, corporations, investment companies and other collective investment vehicles. Absent specific guidelines provided by a client, LAM's policy is to vote proxies on a given issue the same for all of its clients. The Policy is based on the view that, in its role as investment adviser, LAM must vote proxies based on what it believes will maximize shareholder value as a long-term investor, and that the votes it casts on behalf of all its clients are intended to accomplish that objective.

Procedures :

Administration and Implementation of Proxy Voting Process . LAM's proxy-voting process is administered by its Proxy Operations Department ("ProxyOps"), which reports to LAM's Chief Operating Officer. Oversight of the process is provided by LAM's Legal/Compliance Department and by a Proxy Committee consisting of senior LAM officers. To assist it in its proxy-voting responsibilities, LAM currently subscribes to several research and other proxy-related services offered by Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. ("ISS"), one of the world's largest providers of proxy-voting services. ISS provides LAM with its independent analysis and recommendation regarding virtually every proxy proposal that LAM votes on behalf of its clients, with respect to both U.S. and non-U.S. securities.

LAM's Proxy Committee has approved specific proxy voting guidelines regarding the most common proxy proposals (the "Approved Guidelines"). These Approved Guidelines provide that LAM should vote for or against the proposal, or that the proposal should be considered on a case-by-case basis. LAM believes that its portfolio managers and global research analysts with knowledge of the company ("Portfolio Management") are in the best position to evaluate the impact that the outcome of a given proposal will have on long-term shareholder value. Therefore, ProxyOps seeks Portfolio Management's recommendation on all proposals to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Portfolio Management is also given the opportunity to review all proposals (other than routine proposals) where the Approved Guideline is to vote for or against, and, in compelling circumstances, to overrule the Approved Guideline, subject to the Proxy Committee's final determination. The Manager of ProxyOps may also consult with LAM's Chief Compliance Officer or the Proxy Committee concerning any proxy agenda or proposal.

Types of Proposals . Shareholders receive proxies involving many different proposals. Many proposals are routine in nature, such as a non-controversial election of Directors or a change in a company's name. Other proposals are more complicated, such as items regarding corporate governance and shareholder rights, changes to capital structure, stock option plans and other executive compensation issues, mergers and other significant transactions and social or political issues. The Policy lists the Approved Guidelines for the most common proposals. New or unusual proposals may be presented from time to time. Such proposals will be presented to Portfolio Management and discussed with the Proxy Committee to determine how they should be voted, and an Approved Guideline will be adopted if appropriate.

Conflicts of Interest . The Policy recognizes that there may be times when meeting agendas or proposals create the appearance of a material conflict of interest for LAM. Should the appearance of such a conflict

C-24

exist, LAM will seek to alleviate the conflict by voting consistent with an Approved Guideline (to vote for or against), or, in situations where the Approved Guideline is to vote case-by-case, with the recommendation of an independent source, currently Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS"). If the recommendations of the two services offered by ISS, the Proxy Advisor Service and the Proxy Voter Service, are not the same, LAM will obtain a recommendation from a third independent source that provides proxy voting advisory services, and will defer to the majority recommendation. If a third independent source is not available, LAM will follow the recommendation of ISS's Proxy Advisor Service.

C-25

APPENDIX M

PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Revised January 2011

POLICY STATEMENT

Introduction - This document sets forth the policies and procedures of Levin Capital Strategies, LP (“LCS” or “Adviser”) for voting proxies with respect to securities held in the accounts of clients for whom the Adviser provides discretionary investment management services and for whom the Adviser has been granted the authority to vote proxies. The Adviser's proxy voting policy and general guidelines (the "Proxy Policy") will be reviewed and, as necessary, updated periodically to address new or revised proxy voting issues.

The Adviser will vote proxies as part of its authority to manage, acquire, and/or dispose of account assets.

The Adviser will not vote proxies if the client, or in the case of an account governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), the "named fiduciary," has explicitly reserved the authority for itself. When voting proxies for client accounts, the Adviser's primary objective is to make voting decisions in the best interests of the clients (including the plan beneficiaries and participants of ERISA clients). In fulfilling its obligations to clients, the Adviser will act in a manner deemed to be prudent and diligent and in a manner which is intended to enhance the economic value of the underlying securities held in client accounts. In certain situations, a client or its fiduciary may provide the Adviser with a statement of proxy voting policy. In these situations, the Adviser generally seeks to comply with the client’s or its fiduciary policy to the extent in the case of ERISA clients it would not be inconsistent with ERISA.

Department of Labor - With respect to the voting of proxies relating to securities held in an ERISA account, the Department of Labor has made it clear that a voting policy must be in place for recurring issues and that non-routine issues must be addressed by consistent criteria. However, the Department of Labor has stated that specific analysis on the issues of each proxy must still be performed. Distinctly identifying issues on an issuer's proxy ballot and having a method to track recurring and non-routine issues are an important part of the process.

Proxy Governance – Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. ("BICS") has been retained by the Adviser to provide research, vote execution, reporting, and record keeping services. BICS has in turn contracted with Glass Lewis & Co. ("GL") for GL's proxy research services. The Adviser will generally follow GL proxy voting recommendations unless the Adviser believes it is in the best interest of the Adviser’s clients to vote differently. This service provider may be replaced at any time by another third party proxy voting service.

Voting Proxies for Foreign Companies – The Adviser primarily invests client assets in United States issuers, however, from time to time the Adviser may invest outside of the United States. While the proxy voting process is well established in the United States with a number of tools and services available to assist an investment manager, voting proxies of foreign companies may involve a number of logistical

C-26

problems that my have a detrimental effect on the Adviser's ability to vote such proxies. The logistical problems include, but are not limited to: (i) proxy statements and ballots being written in a foreign language, (ii) untimely and/or inadequate notice of shareholder meetings, (iii) restrictions on a foreigner's ability to exercise votes, (iv) requirements to vote proxies in person, (v) the imposition of restrictions on the sale of the securities for a period of time in proximity to the shareholder meeting, and (vi) requirements to provide local agents with power of attorney to facilitate the Adviser's voting instructions.

While GL has been retained to provide assistance to the Adviser in voting it's clients' foreign proxies, such proxies are voted on a best-efforts basis given the above-mentioned logistical problems. Additionally, the Adviser may conduct a cost-benefit analysis in determining whether to attempt to vote its clients' shares at a foreign company's meeting, whereby if it is determined that the cost associated with the attempt to exercise its vote outweighs the benefit the Adviser believes its clients will derive by voting on the company's proposal, the Adviser may decide not to attempt to vote at the meeting.

GENERAL PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

It is the policy LCS in voting proxies to consider and vote each proposal with the objective of maximizing long-term investment returns for its clients.

LCS will utilize the proxy voting guidelines set forth by GL with respect to a wide range of matters. These guidelines address a range of issues, including corporate governance, executive compensation, capital structure proposals and social responsibility issues and are meant to be general voting parameters on issues that arise most frequently. The Adviser's policies (as set forth below) do not follow the GL guidelines in all respects, and the Adviser may vote in a manner on a case by case basis that is contrary to the following general guidelines if it believes that such vote would be in the best interests of the Adviser's clients. However, if a client has their own proxy voting guidelines, we will adhere to their policy and vote the proxy as set forth by the client absent ERISA restrictions.

While GL has been retained to provide assistance to the Adviser in voting its clients' foreign proxies, such proxies are voted on a best-efforts basis given the above-mentioned logistical issues. Additionally, the Adviser may conduct a cost-benefit analysis in determining whether to attempt to vote its clients' shares at a foreign company's meeting, whereby if it is determined that the cost associated with the attempt to exercise its vote outweighs the benefit the Adviser believes its clients will derive by voting on the company's proposal, the Adviser may decide not to attempt to vote at the meeting.

LCS will follow GL’s Policy and Analysis methodology. LCS has elected to use GL’s “management bias” proxy voting approach. Please refer to the attached document for additional information which is a concise summary of GL's proxy voting guidelines employed by LCS. LCS at is discretion may vote differently than GL’s recommendation. Whenever this occurs, LCS will prepare a written document for the files explaining the reason LCS is voting the shares accordingly. If GL does not have a recommendation or holdings are only related to Levin Family related accounts, LCS will vote in favor of management’s recommendation provided that there are no material conflicts of interests present. In limited circumstances, LCS may refrain from voting proxies where LCS believes that voting would be inappropriate taking into consideration the cost of voting the proxy and the anticipated benefit to the

C-27

Funds and Managed Accounts.

GUIDELINES WITH REGARD TO ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

Certain accounts, including affiliated investment vehicles, managed by the Adviser pursuant to alternative investment strategies may make investments with short-term investment horizons, which are transaction specific or are otherwise event driven. For this reason, the application of the above guidelines, which are geared towards achieving what is in the long term best interests of shareholders, may not necessarily be in the best interest of clients of such alternative investment strategies. The employees of the Adviser responsible for making proxy voting decisions with regard to such accounts may evaluate certain proposals on an individual basis and may depart from the general guidelines described above in voting on such proposals in order to best serve the financial interests of the clients of the strategy. As a result, the Adviser may from time to time cast different votes for different clients with regard to the same proposal.

In the case of conflicts of interest, however, the procedures outlined below under "Conflicts of Interest" will be followed with regard to all accounts of the Adviser.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The Adviser is sensitive to conflicts of interest that may arise in the proxy decision-making process. Whenever a Portfolio Manager or Research Analyst recommends LCS vote differently than what GL recommends a determination must be made to determine if any conflicts of interests exist. For example, conflicts of interest may arise when:

›	Proxy votes are solicited by an issuer who has an account relationship with the Adviser;

›	Proxy votes are solicited by an issuer that has a material business relationship with the Adviser;

›	A proponent of a proxy proposal has a business relationship with the Adviser (e.g., a pension fund or an employee group for which the Adviser manages money);

›	The Adviser has material business relationships with participants in proxy contests, corporate directors, or candidates; or

›	An employee of the Adviser may have a personal interest in the outcome of a particular matter.

These items are only examples; additional conflicts of interest may arise from time to time. All employees of the Adviser are required to communicate any potential conflicts of interest with the Compliance Department immediately.

It is the Firm's policy to seek to resolve all conflicts of interest in the clients' best interests. In order to ensure an unbiased decision on matters of conflict in situations the Adviser will vote in accordance with recommendations provided by GL; provided, however, that a portfolio manager with regard to an investment strategy may seek approval from the Compliance Department to vote differently from such recommendation if the manager believes that there is compelling evidence that voting differently would

C-28

be in the best interests of the client.

In situations where a client of the Firm requests to direct their vote, the client's instructions will supersede all other policies absent ERISA exceptions. In situations where a client of the Adviser may have a relationship with an issuer or the proponent of a proposal, the Adviser may take such fact into votes on behalf of other clients.

PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING MATERIALITY OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND FOR ADDRESSING MATERIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

LCS shall maintain a Proxy Voting Committee to review and address conflicts of interest brought to its attention. The Proxy Voting Committee shall be comprised of The President, CEO, COO, CCO, and the Head Trader. The Proxy voting committee shall meet as needed with no determined schedule.

All conflicts of interest identified pursuant to the procedures outlined in this Policy and Procedures must be brought to the attention of the Proxy Voting Committee. The Proxy Voting Committee shall determine whether a conflict of interest is material. A conflict of interest will be considered material to the extent that it is determined that such conflict is likely to influence, or appear to influence, LCS’s decision-making in voting the proxy. All materiality determinations will be based on an assessment of the particular facts and circumstances. LCS Compliance Department shall maintain a written record of all determinations made by the Proxy Voting Committee.

If it is determined by the Proxy Voting Committee that a conflict of interest is not material, LCS may vote proxies notwithstanding the existence of the conflict.

If it is determined by the Proxy Voting Committee that a conflict of interest is material, the Proxy Voting Committee shall determine an appropriate method to resolve such conflict of interest before the proxy affected by the conflict of interest is voted. Such determination shall be based on the particular facts and circumstances, including the importance of the proxy issue, the nature of the conflict of interest, etc... Such methods may include:

1. In the case of a conflict of interest resulting from a particular employee’s personal relationships, removing such employee from the decision-making process with respect to such proxy vote; or

2. Such other method as is deemed appropriate given the particular facts and circumstances, including the importance of the proxy issue, the nature of the conflict of interest, etc.. *

LCS Compliance shall maintain a written record of the method used to resolve a material conflict of interest, and the recommendation on how the proxy should be voted.

__________________________

* Especially in the case of an apparent, as opposed to actual, conflict of interest, the Proxy Voting Committee may resolve such conflict of interest by satisfying itself that LCS’s proposed vote on a proxy issue is in the best interest of client accounts and is not being influenced by the conflict of interest.

C-29

OPERATING PROCEDURES

Once LCS has determined that it has the responsibility for voting a client's proxies, the Adviser must vote the appropriate number of shares it is entitled to vote and maintain records indicating the manner in which it exercised its voting authority. In this regard, the following procedures are intended to ensure that LCS satisfies its proxy voting obligations:

1. The LCS Operations Department (the "Operations Department") is responsible for identifying the clients for whom LCS is required to vote proxies.

2. The Adviser utilizes BICS to tabulate and record proxies voted on behalf of its clients. The Operations Department will notify BICS of all new client accounts that have delegated proxy voting authorization to the Adviser. In addition, the Operations Department will notify any changes to existing client accounts. The Operations Department will maintain the required records which detail the manner in which client proxies have been voted.

3. The Portfolio Managers/Research Analysts may from time to time review certain proxy voting recommendations, and as part of their review the Portfolio Manager/Research Analyst will be given GL’s research materials to help aid in their decision making process. After their review has been completed and if the Portfolio Manager/Research Analyst does not agree with GL’s recommendation, the Portfolio Manager/Research Analyst should submit comments why LCS should not vote in agreement with PCI’s recommendation. These comments will then be recorded BICS ProxyEdge voting system for future reference.

4. If the Portfolio Managers/Research Analyst chooses to vote contrary to the GL recommendation, and after receiving approval from the Proxy Committee (only if to meet regarding a conflict of interest situation), the Operations Department will override the GL recommendation in the BICS ProxyEdge system and enter the voting rationale provided by the Portfolio Managers/Research Analyst in the notes section on BICS ProxyEdge.

5. The LCS CCO shall review any instructions provided by the portfolio managers that differ from GL to insure that such instructions comply with LCS' proxy voting guidelines.

6. All documentation relating to proxy voting shall be maintained by the Operations Department for a period of no less than six years.

7. The Operations Department will be responsible for responding to client requests for a proxy voting records that identifies the manner in which LCS voted such clients' proxies.

8. The Operations Department will be responsible for maintaining all client requests for proxy voting records and/or policies for a period of no less than six years.

C-30

Public Proxy Policy Statement

The following is LCS’ public proxy voting policy that must be sent to those clients or potential clients upon request:

The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which requires registered investment advisers that exercise voting authority over client securities to implement proxy voting policies. In compliance with such rules, LCS has adopted proxy voting policies and procedures (the “Policies”). The general policy is to vote proxy proposals, amendments, consents or resolutions relating to client securities, including interests in private investment funds, if any (collectively, “proxies”), in a manner that serves the best interests of the Funds and Managed Accounts, as determined by LCS in its discretion. Generally, LCS will utilize the proxy voting guidelines set forth by Glass Lewis and Co. (“GL”) with respect to a wide range of matters with a bias favoring management. These guidelines address a range of issues, including corporate governance, executive compensation, capital structure proposals and social responsibility issues and are meant to be general voting parameters on issues that arise most frequently. LCS may vote certain proxies on a case by case basis contrary to GL proxy voting guidelines if LCS believes that such vote would be in the best interest of the Adviser’s clients. If such action is undertaken by LCS, we will usually vote with management’s recommendation. If GL does not have a recommendation or holdings are only related to Levin Family related accounts, LCS will vote in favor of management’s recommendation provided that there are no material conflicts of interests present. In limited circumstances, LCS may refrain from voting proxies where LCS believes that voting would be inappropriate taking into consideration the cost of voting the proxy and the anticipated benefit to the Funds and Managed Accounts. A copy of the Policies and the proxy voting record relating to a client or investor in their respective Fund may be obtained by contacting LCS at the address or telephone number listed on the first page of this document.

Any questions regarding our policy statement should be directed to the Compliance Department.

C-31

Proxy Voting Policy

The Firm understands and appreciates the importance of proxy voting. To the extent that Firm has discretion to vote the proxies for a Client, the Firm will vote any such proxies in the best interests of the Client and in accordance with the procedures outlined below (as applicable).

All proxies sent to Clients that are actually received by Firm (to vote on behalf of the Client) will be provided to the Operations team.

The Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) and the CCO will generally ensure that the Firm adheres to the following procedures (subject to limited exception):

	1.	A written record of each proxy received by Firm will be kept in Firm’s files;

	2.	The COO or his designee will determine which Client holds the security to which the proxy relates;

	3.	The COO or his designee will forward the proxy to the responsible analyst for appropriate action;

	4.	Prior to voting any proxies, the Director of Internal Operations will determine if there are any conflicts of interest related to the proxy in question in accordance with the general guidelines below. If a conflict is identified, the Director of Internal Operations will then contact the CCO who will make a determination (which may be in consultation with outside legal counsel) as to whether the conflict is material or not.

	5.	If no material conflict is identified pursuant to these procedures, the responsible analyst will make a decision on how to vote the proxy in question in accordance with the guidelines set forth in below. The Operations team will deliver the proxy in accordance with instructions related to such proxy in a timely and appropriate manner.

	6.	Although not presently intended to be used on a regular basis, the Firm is empowered to retain an independent third party to vote proxies in certain situations (including situations where a material conflict of interest is identified).

HANDLING OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

As stated above, in evaluating how to vote a proxy, the COO will first determine whether there is a conflict of interest related to the proxy in question between the Firm and its Clients. This examination will include (but will not be limited to) an evaluation of whether the Firm (or any affiliate of the Firm) has any relationship with the company (or an affiliate of the company) to which the proxy relates outside an investment in such company by a Client.

If a conflict is identified and deemed “material” by the COO, the Firm will determine whether voting in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines outlined below is in the best interests of affected Clients (which may include utilizing an independent third party to vote such proxies).

With respect to material conflicts, the Firm will determine whether it is appropriate to disclose the conflict to affected Clients and give Clients the opportunity to vote the proxies in question themselves except that, if the Client is subject to the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

C-32

of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and an ERISA Client has, in writing, reserved the right to vote proxies when Firm has determined that a material conflict exists that does affect its best judgment as a fiduciary to the Client, Firm will:

	o	Give the ERISA client the opportunity to vote the proxies in question themselves; or
	o	Follow designated special proxy voting procedures related to voting proxies pursuant to the terms of the written agreements with such ERISA Clients (if any).

VOTING GUIDELINES

In the absence of specific voting guidelines mandated by a particular Client, the Firm will endeavor to vote proxies in the best interests of each Client.

The Firm will generally vote in favor of routine corporate housekeeping proposals including, but not limited to, the following:

	o	Election of directors (where there are no related corporate governance issues);
	o	Selection or reappointment of auditors; or
	o	Increasing or reclassification of common stock.

Additionally, the Firm will generally vote in favor of proposals by management or shareholders concerning various compensation and stock option plans that will act to make management and employee compensation more dependent on long-term stock price performance.

The Firm will generally vote against proposals that:

	o	make it more difficult to replace members of the issuer’s board of directors or board of managers;
	o	introduce unequal voting rights (although there may be regulatory reasons that would make such a proposal favorable to certain clients);
	o	make it more difficult for an issuer to be taken over by outsiders, and in favor of proposals to do the opposite;
	o	would permit moving the company to another state less favorable to shareholders’ interests, or;
	o	would allow the company to restructure classes of stock in such a way as to benefit one class of shareholders at the expense of another, such as dual classes (A and B shares) of stock.

The foregoing are general guidelines. The Firm may determine that it is in the best interests of its Clients to vote contrary to the above guidelines in certain situations.

DISCLOSURE OF PROCEDURES

Employees should note that a brief summary of these proxy-voting procedures will be included in Adviser’s Form ADV Part 2 and will be updated whenever these policies and procedures are updated. Clients will also be provided with contact information as to how they can obtain information about the details of Adviser’s procedures (i.e., a copy of these procedures), and voted proxies that are relevant to the affected Client.

C-33

BOOKS AND RECORDS

The CCO will be responsible for overseeing the process whereby files relating to Adviser’s proxy voting records will be maintained and preserved for five years from the end of the fiscal year during which the last entry was made on a record, with records for the first two years kept in the offices of Adviser. Records of the following will be included in the files:

	o	Copies of these proxy voting policies and procedures, and any amendments thereto;
	o	A copy of each proxy statement that Adviser actually receives; provided, however, that the Adviser may rely on obtaining a copy of proxy statements from the SEC’s EDGAR system for those proxy statements that are so available;
	o	A record of each vote that the Adviser casts;
	o	A copy of any document that the Adviser created that was material to making a decision how to vote the proxies, or memorializes that decision (if any); and
	o	A copy of any written request by a Client, as well as any written response to such Client, regarding information on how the Adviser voted proxies on its behalf.

C-34

MacKay Shields LLC

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

1. Introduction

MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields” or the “Firm”), has adopted these “Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures” (the “Policy”) to ensure the Firm’s compliance with Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”) and other applicable fiduciary obligations. The Policy applies to proxies relating to securities held by clients of MacKay Shields who have delegated the responsibility of voting proxies to the Firm. The Policy is designed to assist Firm employees in meeting their specific responsibilities in this area and to reasonably ensure that proxies are voted in the best interests of the Firm’s clients.

2. Statement of Policy

2.1 It is the policy of MacKay Shields that where the Firm has voting authority, all proxies are to be voted in the best interest of the client without regard to the interests of MacKay Shields or other related parties. Specifically, MacKay Shields shall not subordinate the interests of clients to unrelated objectives, including MacKay Shields’ interests. MacKay Shields shall act with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims. For purposes of the Policy, the “best interests of clients” shall mean, unless otherwise specified by the client, the clients’ best economic interests over the long term –that is, the common interest that all MacKay Shields clients share in seeing the value of a common investment increase over time. It is further the policy of the Firm that complete and accurate disclosure concerning its proxy voting policies and procedures and proxy voting records as required by the Advisers Act, be made available to its clients.

2.2 When proxies with respect to securities held by clients of MacKay Shields have not been received by MacKay Shields or its proxy voting service provider, MacKay Shields will make reasonable efforts to obtain missing proxies. MacKay Shields is not responsible for voting proxies it or its proxy voting service provider does not receive.

2.3 MacKay Shields may choose not to vote proxies under the following circumstances:

	●	If the effect on the client’s economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant;
	●	If the cost of voting the proxy outweighs the possible benefit to the client; or
	●	If a jurisdiction imposes share blocking restrictions which prevent the Firm from trading shares.

C-35

3. Use of Third Party Proxy Voting Service Provider

To discharge its responsibility, MacKay Shields has examined third-party services that assist in the researching and voting of proxies and the development of voting guidelines. After such review, the Firm has selected Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCI, Inc. (“ISS”), to research voting proposals, analyze the financial implications of voting proposals and vote proxies. MacKay Shields utilizes the research and analytical services, operational implementation, administration, recordkeeping and reporting services provided by ISS.

4. Proxy Voting Guidelines

4.1 MacKay Shields has determined that, except as set forth in Sections 6 and 7, proxies for non-union clients who so specify will be voted in accordance with the voting recommendations contained in the applicable ISS non-union domestic or global proxy voting guidelines, as in effect from time to time (“Non-Union Guidelines”). A summary of the current Non-Union Guidelines is attached as Exhibit A.

4.2 MacKay Shields has determined that, except as set forth in Sections 6 and 7, proxies for union or Taft-Hartley clients who so specify will be voted in accordance with the voting recommendations contained in the applicable ISS Taft-Hartley domestic or global proxy voting guidelines, as in effect from time to time (“Union Guidelines”). A summary of the current Union Guidelines is attached as Exhibit B.

4.3 For purposes of the Policy, the Non-Union and Union Guidelines are collectively referred to as the Standard Guidelines.

4.4 A client may choose to use proxy voting guidelines different from the Standard Guidelines (“Custom Guidelines”). Any Custom Guidelines must be furnished by the client to MacKay Shields in writing.

4.5 In the event the Standard Guidelines or any client’s Custom Guidelines do not address how a proxy should be voted or state that the vote is to be determined on a “case-by-case” basis, the proxy will be voted in accordance with ISS recommendations, subject to Section 6. In the event that ISS has not made a recommendation, MacKay Shields will follow the procedure set forth in Section 7.

4.6 Notwithstanding the foregoing, MacKay Shields will vote a proxy with respect to a particular security held by a client in accordance with such client’s specific request even if it is in a manner inconsistent with the Standard Guidelines or the client’s Custom Guidelines, as the case may be. Any such specific requests must be furnished to MacKay Shields by the client in writing and must be received by MacKay on a timely basis for instructing ISS how to cast the vote.

4.7 In order to avoid possible conflicts of interest, MacKay Shields votes proxies based on the Standard Guidelines or a client’s Custom Guidelines, as the case may be. However, it is recognized that the Firm’s portfolio management team has the ultimate responsibility for proxy voting.

C-36

4.8 For clients using the Standard Guidelines, the Firm will instruct ISS to cast votes in accordance with the Standard Guidelines. For clients using Custom Guidelines, the Firm will provide ISS with a copy of such Custom Guidelines and will instruct ISS to cast votes in accordance with such Custom Guidelines. ISS will cast votes in accordance with the Standard Guidelines or Custom Guidelines, as the case may be, unless instructed otherwise by MacKay Shields as set forth in Sections 6 and 7. Upon receipt of a specific request from a client pursuant to Section 4.6, the Firm will instruct ISS to cast such client’s proxy in accordance with such request.

5. Client Account Set-up and Review

5.1 Initially, MacKay Shields must determine whether the client seeks to retain the responsibility of voting proxies, or seeks to delegate that responsibility to the Firm. The marketing or client service person responsible for setting up the account, in conjunction with MacKay’s Legal/Compliance Department, will have primary responsibility for making that determination. In its sole discretion, the Firm may decline to accept authority to vote a client’s proxies. Any such refusal shall be in writing.

5.2 If MacKay Shields has authority to vote a client’s proxies, the marketing or client service person responsible for setting up the account will ask the client to specify in writing (which may be by e-mail) whether the Firm should vote proxies in accordance with the Non-Union Guidelines, Union Guidelines or Custom Guidelines.

5.3 In most cases, the delegation of voting authority to MacKay Shields, and the Firm’s use of a third-party proxy voting service provider shall be memorialized in the client’s investment management agreement.

5.4 MacKay Shields shall notify ISS of new client accounts using such form as ISS shall specify from time to time. Designated personnel within the Firm will be responsible for ensuring that each new client’s account for which the Firm has proxy voting authority is established on the appropriate systems and that each such account is properly coded for voting under the appropriate Non-Union Guidelines, Union Guidelines or Custom Guidelines, as the case may be.

6. Overriding Guidelines

A portfolio manager may propose that a particular proxy vote be cast in a manner different from the Standard Guidelines or a ISS voting recommendation, or may propose an abstention from voting, if he/she believes that to do so, based on all facts and circumstances, is in the best interest of the Firm’s clients as a whole. Any portfolio manager who proposes to override the Standard Guidelines or a ISS voting recommendation on a particular vote or to abstain from voting must complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form, which is set forth in Schedule C.

C-37

7. Referral of Voting Decision by ISS to MacKay Shields

7.1 In the event that the Standard Guidelines or a client’s Custom Guidelines do not address how a proxy should be voted on a specific proposal for an issuer and ISS has not made a recommendation as to how such proxy should be voted, ISS will so advise MacKay Shields. In that event, the Legal/Compliance Department will request that the appropriate portfolio manager make a voting recommendation and complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form.

7.2 In the event that the Standard Guidelines or a client’s Custom Guidelines require a “case-by-case” determination on a particular proxy vote and ISS has not made a recommendation as to how such proxy should be voted, ISS will so advise MacKay Shields. In that event, the Legal/Compliance Department will request that the appropriate portfolio manager make a voting recommendation and complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form.

7.3 In the event that ISS determines that a conflict of interest exists as a result of which ISS is precluded from making a recommendation as to how a proxy should be voted on a specific proposal for an issuer, ISS will so advise MacKay Shields. In that event, the Legal/Compliance Department will request that the appropriate portfolio manager make a voting recommendation and complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form.

8. Conflicts of Interest

8.1 The Firm’s portfolio managers may make proxy voting decisions in connection with (i) overriding the Standard Guidelines or an ISS voting recommendation pursuant to Section 6, or (ii) deciding on a vote pursuant to Section 7. In such event, the portfolio managers have an affirmative duty to disclose any potential conflict of interest known to them that exists between the Firm and the client on whose behalf the proxy is to be voted (“Conflict”).

8.2 . By way of example, Conflicts may exist in situations where the Firm is called to vote on a proxy involving an issuer or proponent of a proxy proposal regarding the issuer where MacKay Shields or an affiliated person of the Firm also:

	●	Manages the issuer’s or proponent’s pension plan;
	●	Administers the issuer’s or proponent’s employee benefit plan;
	●	Provided brokerage, underwriting, insurance or banking services to the issuer or proponent; or
	●	Manages money for an employee group.

C-38

Additional Conflicts may exist, among others, if an executive of the Firm or its control affiliates is a close relative of, or has a personal or business relationship with:

	●	An executive of the issuer or proponent;
	●	A director of the issuer or proponent;
	●	A person who is a candidate to be a director of the issuer;
	●	A participant in the proxy contest; or
	●	A proponent of a proxy proposal.

8.3 Whether a relationship creates a Conflict will depend on the facts and circumstances. Even if these parties do not attempt to influence the Firm with respect to voting, the value of the relationship to MacKay Shields or an affiliate can create a Conflict.

8.4 After a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form is completed pursuant to Sections 6 or 7, such Form, which elicits information as to whether a potential Conflict exists, must be submitted to the Legal/Compliance Department for review. If the Firm’s General Counsel (“GC”) or Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) determines that there is no potential Conflict, the GC or CCO or their designee may instruct ISS to vote the proxy issue as set forth in the completed Form.

8.5 If the GC or CCO determines that there exists or may exist a Conflict, he or she will refer the issue to the Compliance Committee for consideration by convening (in person or via telephone) an emergency meeting of the Compliance Committee. For purposes of this Policy, a majority vote of those members present shall resolve any Conflict. The Compliance Committee will consider the facts and circumstances of the pending proxy vote and the potential or actual Conflict and make a determination as to how to vote the proxy – i.e., whether to permit or deny the recommendation of the portfolio manager, or whether to take other action, such as delegating the proxy vote to an independent third party or obtaining voting instructions from clients.

8.6 In considering the proxy vote and potential Conflict, the Compliance Committee may review the following factors, including but not limited to:

	·	The percentage of outstanding securities of the issuer held on behalf of clients by the Firm.
	·	The nature of the relationship of the issuer or proponent with the Firm, its affiliates or its executive officers.
	·	Whether there has been any attempt to directly or indirectly influence the portfolio manager’s decision.
	·	Whether the direction (for or against) of the proposed vote would appear to benefit the Firm or a related party.
	·	Whether an objective decision to vote in a certain way will still create a strong appearance of a Conflict.

MacKay Shields may not abstain from voting any such proxy for the purpose of avoiding Conflict.

C-39

9. Securities Lending

If MacKay Shields portfolio managers or their designees become aware of an upcoming shareholder meeting where there is an important vote to be taken, or become aware of a request for consent of security holders on a material matter affecting the investment, MacKay Shields will consider whether to request that clients call back securities loans, if applicable. In determining whether to request that clients call back securities loans, the relevant portfolio manager(s) shall consider whether the benefit to the client in voting the matter or giving or withholding consent outweighs the benefit to the client in keeping the security on loan. There may be instances when MacKay Shields may not be aware of the upcoming shareholder meeting or request for consent with sufficient time in advance to make such a request, or when MacKay Shields’ request that a client call back a securities loan in sufficient time to vote or give or withhold consent may not be successful.

10. Reporting

Upon request, MacKay Shields shall report annually (or more frequently if specifically requested) to its clients on proxy votes cast on their behalf. MacKay Shields will provide any client who makes a written or verbal request with a copy of a report disclosing how MacKay Shields voted securities held in that client’s portfolio. The report will generally contain the following information:

·	The name of the issuer of the security;
·	The security’s exchange ticker symbol;
·	The security’s CUSIP number;
·	The shareholder meeting date;
·	A brief identification of the matter voted on;
·	Whether the matter was proposed by the issuer or by a security holder;
·	Whether MacKay Shields cast its vote on the matter on behalf of the client;
·	How MacKay Shields voted on behalf of the client; and
·	Whether MacKay Shields voted for or against management on behalf of the client.

11. Record-Keeping

Either MacKay Shields or ISS as indicated below will maintain the following records:

·	A copy of the Policy and MacKay’s Standard Guidelines and Custom Guidelines;
·	A copy of each proxy statement received by MacKay Shields or forwarded to ISS by the client’s custodian regarding client securities;
·	A record of each vote cast by MacKay Shields on behalf of a client;
·	A copy of all documents created by MacKay Shields that were material to making a decision on the proxy voting (or abstaining from voting) of client securities or that memorialize the basis for that decision including the resolution of any Conflict, a copy of all guideline override requests and all supporting documents; and
·	A copy of each written request by a client for information on how MacKay Shields voted proxies on behalf of the client, as well as a copy of any written

C-40

	response by MacKay Shields to any request by a client for information on how MacKay Shields voted proxies on behalf of the client; records of oral requests for information or oral responses will not be kept.

Such records must be maintained for at least eight years, the first two years in an appropriate office of MacKay Shields.

12. Review of Voting and Guidelines

As part of its periodic reviews, MacKay Shields’ Legal/Compliance Department will conduct an annual review of the prior year’s proxy voting as well as the guidelines established for proxy voting. Documentation shall be maintained of this review and a report setting forth the results of the review will be presented annually to the Compliance Committee.

13. How to Request Information On How the Firm Voted Proxies

Clients may, at anytime, request and receive information from MacKay Shields as to how the Firm voted proxies for securities held in their account. Any such proxy information request should be in writing and mailed or faxed [(212)-754-9205] to MacKay Shields Client Services Department at:

MacKay Shields LLC

9 West 57 th Street

New York, NY 10019

ATTN: Client Services

Attachments :

Exhibit A	-	Summary of Standard Guidelines for non-union clients
Exhibit B	-	Summary of Standard Guidelines for union clients (Taft-Hartley)
Schedule C	-	Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form

___________________

Effective January 3, 2011

C-41

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

Proxies are assets of SLS’ Clients that must be voted with diligence, care, and loyalty. SLS will vote each proxy or abstain from voting proxies in accordance with its fiduciary duty to its Clients. SLS will generally seek to vote proxies in a way that maximizes the value of Clients’ assets. However, SLS will document and abide by any specific proxy voting instructions conveyed by a Client with respect to that Client’s securities. SLS has retained Glass Lewis to provide independent research and proxy voting recommendations. SLS votes proxies through Broadridge’s Proxy Edge platform. SLS will generally vote with Glass Lewis recommendations. If the Portfolio Manager or analyst determines that Glass Lewis recommendation is against SLS’s Clients best interest, the COO will review the particular resolutions with the Portfolio Manager and/or analyst responsible for the investment and vote per the Portfolio Manager/analyst’s recommendation. The COO is responsible for communicating proxy voting instructions as well as overrides to Broadridge’s Proxy Edge platform.

SLS may abstain from voting a Client proxy if SLS concludes that the effect on Client’s economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant. SLS may abstain from voting a Client proxy for cost reasons (e.g., costs associated with voting proxies of non-U.S. securities). In accordance with its fiduciary duties, SLS weighs the costs and benefits of voting proxy proposals relating to foreign securities and makes an informed decision with respect to whether voting a given proxy proposal is prudent. Its decision takes into account the effect that the vote or participation of its clients, either by itself or together with other votes is expected to have on the value of its Client’s investment and whether this expected effect would outweigh the cost of voting the proxy.

From time to time, conflicts of interest may exist between SLS and its Clients and/or Investors with respect to the voting of proxies. Where material conflicts of interest are identified, SLS will vote based on Glass Lewis’s recommendation to ensure the best economic interests of its Clients are met. The COO will endeavor to document potential conflicts of interest around Client proxies, which will be reviewed prior to voting against Glass Lewis’s recommendation.

Paragraph (c)(ii) of Rule 204-2 under the Advisers Act requires SLS to maintain certain books and records associated with its proxy voting policies and procedures. SLS’ recordkeeping obligations are described in the Maintenance of Books and Records section of this Manual. SLS keeps a record of all accounts and proxies voted and various monthly and/or quarterly reports as required under its books and records policy through Broadridge’s Proxy Edge platform.

C-42

Proxy Voting Procedures

Procedures

The CCO is responsible for determining whether a particular proxy vote may have a material economic impact on an underlying Client position or trading strategy and, if so, instructing the custodian to act in the manner which the CCO believes will increase the value of the underling credit position or short-term trading strategy. In make any such determination, the CCO shall consider any potential conflicts of interest which may exist and shall at all times act in the manner in which he believes will further the economic interests of the clients. The CCO shall document the rationale for any decision to vote or not to vote a proxy.

Sound Point may retain a third-party to assist it in coordinating and voting Client Proxies. If so, the CCO will monitor the third-party to assure that all proxies are being properly voted and appropriate records are being retained.

Any employee, officer or director of Sound Point receiving an inquiry directly from a company holding a proxy contest must promptly notify the CCO.

Conflicts of Interest

Sound Point will not put its own interests ahead of a Client’s interest at any time, and will resolve any potential conflicts between its interests and those of its Clients in favor of its Clients. The CCO will be primarily responsible for determining whether a conflict of interest exists in connection with any Client Proxy vote. The CCO will presume a conflict of interest to exist whenever Sound Point or any partner, member, affiliate, subsidiary or employee of Sound Point has a personal or business interest in the outcome of a particular matter before shareholders.

Limitations on Proxy Voting

Sound Point will not be obliged to vote a Client Proxy if Sound Point reasonably determines that the cost of voting such Securities would exceed the expected benefit to the Client.

Disclosure to Clients

Form ADV Disclosure

Sound Point will disclose in Part 2A of its Form ADV that Clients may contact the CCO during regular business hours, via email or telephone, to obtain information on how Sound Point voted such Client’s proxies for the past 5 years. The summary of this Policy included in Sound Point’s Part 2A of its Form ADV will be updated whenever this Policy is revised. Clients may also receive a copy of this Policy upon their request.

Note that updating the Form ADV with a change to the proxy voting policy outside of the annual update is voluntary. However, Sound Point will need to communicate to the Client any changes to this Policy affecting its fiduciary duty.

Client Requests for Information

Clients and Private Fund Investors may request a copy of this Policy and/or information about how Sound Point has voted securities in their behalf (or, with respect to a Private Fund) account by contacting Sound Point. Sound Point will not disclose proxy votes made on behalf of a Client to other Clients or third parties unless

C-43

specifically requested, in writing, by the Client. However, to the extent that Sound Point may serve as sub-adviser to another adviser to a client, Sound Point will be deemed to be authorized to provide proxy voting records on such Accounts to such other adviser.

Recordkeeping

In accordance with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 204-2 of the Advisers Act, Sound Point will, for a period of at least 5 years from the end of the fiscal year during which the record was finalized, maintain or have ready access to the following documents, the first 2 years in an appropriate office of Sound Point:

	(i)	a copy of this Policy;

	(ii)	a copy of each proxy statement received by Sound Point regarding Securities held on behalf of its Clients;

	(iii)	a record of each vote cast by Sound Point on behalf of its Clients;

	(iv)	a copy of any documents prepared by Sound Point that were material to making a decision how to vote, or that memorialized the basis for such decision; and

	(v)	a copy of each written request received from a Client as to how Sound Point voted proxies on its behalf, and a copy of any written response from Sound Point to any (written or oral) Client request for information on how Sound Point voted proxies on its behalf.

To fulfill some of these recordkeeping requirements, Sound Point may rely on proxy statements filed on EDGAR and proxy statements and records of proxy votes cast that are maintained with a proxy voting service or other third-party, provided that Sound Point has obtained an undertaking from such third-party to provide a copy of the documents promptly upon request.

Sound Point will retain each of the records listed above in accordance with Sound Point’s Policy Regarding Recordkeeping .

C-44

TURNER INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.

TURNER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC

Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures

Turner Investment Partners, Inc., as well as its investment advisory affiliate, Turner Investment Management LLC (collectively, “Turner”), act as fiduciaries in relation to their clients and the assets entrusted by them to their management. Where the assets placed in Turner’s care include shares of corporate stock, and except where the client has expressly reserved to itself or another party the duty to vote proxies, it is Turner’s duty as a fiduciary to vote all proxies relating to such shares.

Duties with Respect to Proxies:

Turner has an obligation to vote all proxies appurtenant to shares of corporate stock owned by its client accounts in the best interests of those clients. In voting these proxies, Turner may not be motivated by, or subordinate the client’s interests to, its own objectives or those of persons or parties unrelated to the client. Turner will exercise all appropriate and lawful care, skill, prudence and diligence in voting proxies, and shall vote all proxies relating to shares owned by its client accounts and received by Turner. Turner shall not be responsible, however, for voting proxies that it does not receive in sufficient time to respond.

Delegation to Proxy Voter Services:

In order to carry out its responsibilities in regard to voting proxies, Turner must track all shareholder meetings convened by companies whose shares are held in Turner client accounts, identify all issues presented to shareholders at such meetings, formulate a principled position on each such issue and ensure that proxies pertaining to all shares owned in client accounts are voted in accordance with such determinations.

Consistent with these duties, Turner has delegated certain aspects of the proxy voting process to Institutional Shareholder Services, and its Proxy Voter Services (PVS) subsidiary. PVS is a separate investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Under an agreement entered into with Turner, PVS has agreed to vote proxies in accordance with recommendations developed by PVS and overseen by Turner, except in those instances where Turner has provided it with different direction.

PVS’s voting recommendations typically favor the interests of the shareholder/owner rather than a company’s management. Turner’s long-standing practice has been to follow voting guidelines of this type. Although Turner has not chosen PVS or its services for this reason, its engagement of PVS could be interpreted as helpful to maintaining or attracting clients or potential clients supportive of shareholder/owner rights. In this respect its engagement of PVS potentially presents a conflict of interest for Turner, which has a number of clients concerned with shareholder/owner rights, including but not limited to public plans and unions.

C-45

It should be emphasized that any client or potential client of Turner need not delegate the voting of proxies to Turner (and thus indirectly to PVS as overseen by Turner), and may instead direct its custodian or another party to undertake this responsibility. Alternatively, a client or potential client may direct Turner to vote following guidelines it selects rather than following the Turner selected PVS guidelines if its preference is to follow voting guidelines that typically favor the interests of company management. Turner will provide upon request a copy of the current proxy voting guidelines followed by PVS to assist you in this evaluation.

Review and Oversight:

Turner has reviewed the methods used by PVS to identify and track shareholder meetings called by publicly traded issuers throughout the United States and around the globe. Turner has satisfied itself that PVS operates a system reasonably designed to identify all such meetings and to provide Turner with timely notice of the date, time and place of such meetings. Turner has further reviewed the principles and procedures employed by PVS in making recommendations on voting proxies on each issue presented, and has satisfied itself that PVS’s recommendations are: (i) based upon an appropriate level of diligence and research, and (ii) designed to further the interests of shareholders and not serve other unrelated or improper interests. Turner, either directly or through its duly-constituted Proxy Committee, shall review its determinations as to PVS at least annually.

Notwithstanding its belief that PVS’s recommendations are consistent with the best interests of shareholders and appropriate to be implemented for Turner’s client accounts, Turner has the right and the ability to depart from a recommendation made by PVS as to a particular vote, slate of candidates or otherwise, and can direct PVS to vote all or a portion of the shares owned for client accounts in accordance with Turner’s preferences. PVS is bound to vote any such shares subject to that direction in strict accordance with all such instructions. Turner, through its Proxy Committee, reviews on a regular basis the overall shareholder meeting agenda, and seeks to identify shareholder votes that warrant further review based upon either (i) the total number of shares of a particular company stock that Turner holds for its clients accounts, or (ii) the particular subject matter of a shareholder vote, such as board independence or shareholders’ rights issues. In determining whether to depart from a PVS recommendation, the Turner Proxy Committee looks to its view of the best interests of shareholders, and provides direction to PVS only where in Turner’s view departing from the PVS recommendation appears to be in the best interests of Turner’s clients as shareholders. The Proxy Committee keeps minutes of its determinations in this regard.

The Turner Proxy Committee has only very infrequently departed from the PVS recommendation, and clients should expect that the PVS recommendation will be followed for the vast majority of votes.

Conflicts of Interest:

Turner stock is not publicly traded, and Turner is not otherwise affiliated with any issuer whose shares are available for purchase by client accounts. Further, no Turner affiliate currently

C-46

provides brokerage, underwriting, insurance, banking or other financial services to issuers whose shares are available for purchase by client accounts.

Where a client of Turner is a publicly traded company in its own right, Turner may be restricted from acquiring that company’s securities for the client’s benefit. Further, while Turner believes that any particular proxy issues involving companies that engage Turner, either directly or through their pension committee or otherwise, to manage assets on their behalf, generally will not present conflict of interest dangers for the firm or its clients, in order to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, the Proxy Committee will determine, by surveying the Firm’s employees or otherwise, whether Turner, an affiliate or any of their officers has a business, familial or personal relationship with a participant in a proxy contest, the issuer itself or the issuer’s pension plan, corporate directors or candidates for directorships. In the event that any such relationship is found to exist, the Proxy Committee will take appropriate steps to ensure that any such relationship (or other potential conflict of interest), does not influence Turner’s or the Committee’s decision to provide direction to PVS on a given vote or issue. Further to that end, Turner will adhere to all recommendations made by PVS in connection with all shares issued by such companies and held in Turner client accounts, and, absent extraordinary circumstances that will be documented in writing, will not subject any such proxy to special review by the Proxy Committee.

As discussed above, Turner’s selection of PVS may be considered a potential conflict of interest.

Turner will in all instances seek to resolve any conflicts of interests that may arise prior to voting proxies or selecting a proxy voting agent/research provider in a manner that reflects the best interests of its clients.

Securities Lending:

Turner will generally not vote nor seek to recall in order to vote shares on loan in connection with client administered securities lending programs, unless it determines that a vote is particularly significant. Seeking to recall securities in order to vote them even in these limited circumstances may nevertheless not result in Turner voting the shares because the securities are unable to be recalled in time from the party with custody of the securities, or for other reasons beyond Turner’s control. Clients that participate in securities lending programs should expect that Turner will not frequently vote or seek to recall in order to vote shares that are on loan.

Obtaining Proxy Voting Information:

To obtain information on how Turner voted proxies or for a copy of current PVS guidelines, please contact:

Andrew Mark, Director of Operations

and Technology Administration

c/o Turner Investment Partners, Inc.

1205 Westlakes Drive, Suite 100

Berwyn, PA 19312

C-47

Recordkeeping:

Turner shall retain its (i) proxy voting policies and procedures; (ii) proxy statements received regarding client statements; (iii) records or votes it casts on behalf of clients; (iv) records of client requests for proxy voting information, and (v) any documents prepared by Turner that are material in making a proxy voting decision. Such records may be maintained with a third party, such as PVS, that will provide a copy of the documents promptly upon request.

Adopted: July 1, 2003

Last revised: June 15, 2009

C-48

VIII. PROXY VOTING

A. General

As a fiduciary, an investment adviser with proxy voting authority has a duty to vote proxies in the best interest of clients. Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act (the " Proxy Voting Rule ") places specific requirements on registered investment advisers with proxy voting authority. Because Visium has discretionary authority over the securities held by the Advisory Clients, Visium is viewed as having proxy voting authority. Accordingly, Visium is subject to the Proxy Voting Rule. To meet its obligations under this rule, Visium has adopted these Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

The general policy is to vote proxy proposals, amendments, consents or resolutions relating to client securities, including interests in private investment funds, if any (collectively, "proxies"), in a manner that serves the best interests of the Advisory Clients, as determined by Visium in its discretion, and taking into account relevant factors, including, but not limited to:

●	the impact on the value of the securities;
●	the anticipated costs and benefits associated with the proposal;
●	the effect on liquidity; and
●	customary industry and business practices.

The Firm may abstain from voting (which generally requires submission of a proxy voting card) or affirmatively decide not to vote if the Firm determines that abstaining or not voting is in the best interests of the Advisory Client. In some foreign markets where proxy voting demands fee payment for agent services, Visium will balance the cost and benefit of proxy voting and may abstain from voting if the cost associated is greater than the benefits from voting.

Although not presently intended to be used on a regular basis, Visium may retain an independent third party to vote proxies in certain situations (including situations where a material conflict of interest is identified).

B. Conflicts of Interest

At times, conflicts may arise between the interests of the Advisory Clients, on the one hand, and the interests of Visium or its affiliates, on the other hand. If Visium determines that it has, or may be perceived to have, a conflict of interest when voting a proxy, it will address matters involving such conflicts of interest as follows:

a. If Visium believes it is in the best interest of the Advisory Clients to depart from the specific policies provided for herein, it will be subject to the requirements of (b) or (c) below, as applicable;

b. If there is a potential conflict of interest between Visium and one or more Advisory Clients, Visium may vote such proxy as it determines to be in the best interest of the Advisory Clients, without taking any action described in (c) below, provided that such vote would be against the Firm's own interest in the matter (i.e., against the perceived or actual conflict). Visium will memorialize the rationale of such vote in writing; and

c. If there is a potential conflict of interest between Visium and one or more Advisory Clients, and Visium believes it should vote in a way that may also benefit, or be perceived to benefit, its

C-49

own interest, then it must take one of the following actions in voting such proxy: (1) delegate the voting decision for such proxy proposal to an independent third party; (2) delegate the voting decision to an independent committee of partners, members, directors or other representatives of the affected Advisory Clients; (3) inform the Advisory Clients of the conflict of interest and obtain consent to (majority consent of Investors in the case of a Fund) vote the proxy as recommended by Visium; or (4) obtain approval of the decision from Visium’s Chief Compliance Officer.

C. Procedures for Proxies

The Operations Group will check daily for any new proxy item and then deliver any new proxies to the relevant Portfolio Manager, who will determine how to vote the proxy by applying the parameters described above (or not to vote the proxy). Upon making a decision, the Portfolio Manager will relay this information back to the Operations Group, which will action the proxy using the Prime Broker’s online system.

In the event the Firm determines that the investing Advisory Clients should rely on the advice of an independent third party or a committee regarding the voting of a proxy, the Firm will submit the proxy to such third party or committee for a decision. The Operations Group will execute the proxy in accordance with such third party's or committee's decision.

D. Record of Proxy Voting

The Operations Group will maintain written or electronic copies of each proxy statement received and of each executed proxy.

The Operations Group will also maintain records relating to each proxy, including (i) the voting decision with regard to each proxy and (ii) any documents created by the Portfolio Manager that were material to making the voting decision.

The Operations Group will maintain a record of each written request from an Investor or Managed Account for proxy voting information and the Firm's response to such request (oral or written).

The Chief Compliance Officer is responsible for ensuring that Investors and Managed Accounts are provided with (i) a description of Visium’s proxy voting policies and procedures and (ii) instructions about how they may obtain information from Visium on how Visium voted with respect to securities held by the relevant Advisory Client. Investor Relations is responsible for responding to requests regarding how Visium voted proxies. Investor Relations must immediately inform the Chief Compliance Officer of any requests about how Visium voted proxies.

C-50

NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 33 ON FORM N-1A

PART C

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 28 . Exhibits.

Exhibit Number		Description
(a)	(1)	Restated Certificate of Trust. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds’ (“Registrant’s”) Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 15, 2010).
	(2)	Trust Instrument, Amended and Restated. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 15, 2010).
	(3)	Amended Trust Instrument Schedule A - Listing the Current Series and Classes of Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed November 1, 2013).
(b)	By-Laws, Amended and Restated. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 15, 2010).
(c)	(1)	By-Laws, Amended and Restated, Articles V, VI, and VIII. Incorporated by Reference to Item (b) above.
	(2)	Trust Instrument, Amended and Restated, Articles IV, V and VI. Incorporated by Reference to Item (a)(2) above.
(d)	(1)	(i) Management Agreement Between Registrant and Neuberger Berman Management LLC (“NB Management”). Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Management Agreement Schedules listing the current series of Registrant subject to the Management Agreement and the compensation under the Management Agreement. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(2)	(i) Sub-Advisory Agreement Between NB Management and Neuberger Berman Fixed Income LLC (“NBFI”) with respect to the Registrant. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Sub-Advisory Agreement Schedule listing the current series of Registrant subject to the NBFI Sub-Advisory Agreement. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed November 16, 2012).
	(3)	(i) Sub-Advisory Agreement b etween NB Management and Neuberger Berman LLC (“NB LLC”) with respect to Registrant . Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 28, 2011).

	(ii) Amended Sub-Advisory Agreement Schedule listing the current series of Registrant subject to the NB LLC Sub-Advisory Agreement. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 24 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed February 27, 2013).
(4)	(i) Investment Advisory Agreement between NB Management and NB Alternative Investment Management, LLC (“NBAIM”) with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012).
	(ii) Amended Investment Advisory Agreement Schedules listing the current series of Registrant subject to the Investment Advisory Agreement. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
(5)	(i)	(a) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012). (b) Amendment No. 1 to Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013). (c) Amendment No. 2 to Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund and Neuberger Berman Long Short Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(ii) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012).
	(iii)	(a) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Levin Capital Strategies, L.P. with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012). (b) Amendment No. 1 to Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Levin Capital Strategies, L.P. with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund and Neuberger Berman Long Short Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(iv) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and MacKay Shields LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012).

	(v) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Sound Point Capital Management, L.P. with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012).
	(vi)	(a) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Turner Investments, L.P. with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012). (b) Amendment No. 1 to Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Turner Investments, L.P. with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund and Neuberger Berman Long Short Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(vii) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Visium Asset Management with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012).
	(viii) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Good Hill Partners LP with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(ix)	(a) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Lazard Asset Management LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013). (b) Amendment No. 1 to Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Lazard Asset Management LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund and Neuberger Berman Long Short Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(x) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and Loeb Arbitrage Management LP with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(xi)	(a) Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and SLS Management, LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013). (b) Amendment No. 1 to Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and SLS Management, LLC with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund and Neuberger Berman Long Short Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).

	(6)	Management Agreement between NB Management and the wholly owned subsidiary (“Subsidiary”) of Neuberger Berman Risk Balanced Commodity Strategy Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed August 27, 2012).
	(7)	Sub-Advisory Agreement Between NB Management and NBFI with respect to the Subsidiary. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed August 27, 2012).
(e)	(1)	(i) Distribution and Services Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class A shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Distribution and Services Agreement Schedule with respect to Class A shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(2)	(i) Distribution and Services Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class C shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Distribution and Services Agreement Schedule with respect to Class C shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(3)	(i) Distribution Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Institutional Class shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Distribution Agreement Schedule with respect to Institutional Class shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(4)	Distribution Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class R6 shares. (Filed herewith).
(f)	Bonus or Profit Sharing Contracts. None.
(g)	(1)	(i) Custodian Contract Between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. Incorporated by Reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 15, 2006).
		(ii) Side Letter to Custodian Contract Between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed August 27, 2012).
	(2)	Custodian Contract Between Registrant and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 15, 2012).
(h)	(1)	Transfer Agency and Service Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. Incorporated by Reference to Post Effective Amendment No. 116 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Neuberger Berman Equity Funds, File Nos. 2-11357 and 811-00582 (Filed June 2, 2006).
	(2)	(i) Administration Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class A shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).

		(ii) Amended Administration Agreement Schedule with respect to Class A shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(3)	(i) Administration Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class C shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Administration Agreement Schedule with respect to Class C shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(4)	(i) Administration Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Institutional Class shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Administration Agreement Schedule with respect to Institutional Class shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(5)	Administration Agreement between NB Management and the Subsidiary. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed August 27, 2012).
	(6)	Administration Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class R6 shares. (Filed herewith)
	(7)	Expense Limitation Agreement with respect to Class A, Class C and Institutional Class shares for Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 25 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed February 28, 2013).
	(8)	Expense Limitation Agreement with respect to Class A, Class C and Institutional Class shares for Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 25 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed February 28, 2013).
	(9)	Expense Limitation Agreement with respect to Class A, Class C and Institutional Class shares for Neuberger Berman Dynamic Real Return Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed November 16, 2012).
	(10)	Expense Limitation Agreement with respect to Class A, Class C and Institutional Class shares for Neuberger Berman Risk Balanced Commodity Strategy Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 10, 2013).
	(11)	Expense Limitation Agreement with respect to Class A, Class C and Institutional Class shares for Neuberger Berman Flexible Select Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed May 10, 2013).
	(12)	Expense Limitation Agreement with respect to Class A, Class C and Institutional Class shares for Neuberger Berman Long Short Multi-Manager Fund. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(13)	Expense Limitation Agreement with respect to Class R6 shares for Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund. (Filed herewith).
(i)	Opinion and Consent of K&L Gates LLP with Respect to Securities Matters of Registrant. (Filed herewith).

(j)	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (Filed herewith).
(k)	Financial Statements Omitted from Prospectus. None.
(l)	Letter of Investment Intent. Incorporated by Reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 15, 2006).
(m)	(1)	(i) Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 with respect to Class A shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Schedule A to the Plan Pursuant to Rule 12b-1 with Respect to Class A Shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(2)	(i) Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 with respect to Class C shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 29, 2010).
		(ii) Amended Schedule A to the Plan Pursuant to Rule 12b-1 with Respect to Class C Shares. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
(n)	Plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed November 1, 2013).
(o)	(1)	Powers of Attorney for Registrant. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(2)	Powers of Attorney for Subsidiary. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed August 27, 2012).
(p)	(1)	Code of Ethics for Registrant, NB Management, NBFI and NBAIM. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 158 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Neuberger Berman Equity Funds, File Nos. 2-11357 and 811-582 (Filed December 15, 2011).
	(2)	Code of Ethics for Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn LLC. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed January 18, 2012).
	(3)	Code of Ethics for GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed January 18, 2012).
	(4)	Code of Ethics for Levin Capital Strategies, L.P. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed January 18, 2012).
	(5)	Code of Ethics for MacKay Shields LLC, Amended and Restated. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed January 18, 2012).
	(6)	Code of Ethics for Sound Point Capital Management, L.P. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed January 18, 2012).
	(7)	Code of Ethics for Turner Investments, L.P. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed January 18, 2012).
	(8)	Code of Ethics for Visium Asset Management. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed April 23, 2012).

	(9)	Code of Ethics for Lazard Asset Management LLC. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(10)	Code of Ethics for SLS Management, LLC. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed October 4, 2013).
	(11)	Code of Ethics for Good Hill Partners LP. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).
	(12)	Code of Ethics for Loeb Arbitrage Management LP. Incorporated by Reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715 (Filed December 18, 2013).

Item 29 . Persons Controlled By or Under Common Control with Registrant .

No person is controlled by or under common control with the Registrant.

Item 30 . Indemnification .

A Delaware business trust may provide in its governing instrument for indemnification of its officers and trustees from and against any and all claims and demands whatsoever. Article IX, Section 2 of the Trust Instrument provides that “every person who is, or has been, a Trustee or an officer, employee or agent of the Trust (“Covered Person”) shall be indemnified by the Trust or the appropriate Series to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability and against all expenses reasonably incurred or paid by him in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he becomes involved as a party or otherwise by virtue of his being or having been a Covered Person and against amounts paid or incurred by him in the settlement thereof…”. Indemnification will not be provided to a person adjudicated by a court or other body to be liable to the Registrant or its shareholders by reason of “willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his office” (“Disabling Conduct”), or not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action was in the best interest of the Registrant. In the event of a settlement, no indemnification may be provided unless there has been a determination that the officer or trustee did not engage in Disabling Conduct (i) by the court or other body approving the settlement; (ii) by at least a majority of those trustees who are neither interested persons, as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”), of the Registrant (“Independent Trustees”), nor parties to the matter based upon a review of readily available facts; or (iii) by written opinion of independent legal counsel based upon a review of readily available facts.

Pursuant to Article IX, Section 3 of the Trust Instrument, if any present or former shareholder of any series (“Series”) of the Registrant shall be held personally liable solely by reason of his or her being or having been a shareholder and not because of his or her acts or omissions or for some other reason, the present or former shareholder (or his or her heirs, executors, administrators or other legal representatives or in the case of any entity, its general successor) shall be entitled out of the assets belonging to the applicable Series to be held harmless from and indemnified against all loss and expense arising from such liability. The Registrant, on behalf of the affected Series, shall, upon request by such shareholder, assume the defense of any claim made against such shareholder for any act or obligation of the Series and satisfy any judgment thereon from the assets of the Series.

Section 9 of the Management Agreement between Neuberger Berman Management LLC (“NB Management”) and the Registrant provides that neither NB Management nor any director, officer or employee of NB Management performing services for any series of the Registrant at the direction or request of NB Management in connection with NB Management’s discharge of its obligations under the Agreement shall be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by a series in connection with any matter to which the Agreement relates; provided, that nothing in the Agreement shall be construed (i) to protect NB Management against any liability to the Registrant or any series thereof or its interest holders to which NB Management would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of NB Management’s reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the Agreement, or (ii) to protect any director, officer or employee of NB Management who is or was a trustee or officer of the Registrant against any liability to the Registrant or its interest holders to which such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful

misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office with the Registrant.

Section 6 of the Investment Advisory Agreement between NB Management and Neuberger Berman Fixed Income LLC (“NBFI”) with respect to the Registrant provides that, neither NBFI nor any director, officer or employee of NBFI performing services for any series of the Registrant shall be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by NB Management or the Registrant in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or reckless disregard of its duties and obligations under the Agreement.

Section 11 of the Sub-Advisory Agreement between NB Management, NBAIM and each Subadviser of the Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund requires the Subadviser to indemnify the registrant, NB Management and NBAIM and their directors and officers for losses caused by the Subadviser’s disabling conduct (as described in the Agreement), except where such person would otherwise be liable by reason of willful malfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of his, her or its duties or by reason of his, her or its reckless disregarding of obligations and duties under the agreement. In addition, NB Management is similarly required to indemnify each Subadviser under Section IV of the Agreement. The Investment Advisory Agreement between the NB Management and NBAIM includes the same provision.

Section 12 of the Administration Agreement between the Registrant and NB Management on behalf of each series of the Registrant provides that the Registrant shall indemnify NB Management and hold it harmless from and against any and all losses, damages and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, incurred by NB Management that result from: (i) any claim, action, suit or proceeding in connection with NB Management’s entry into or performance of this Agreement with respect to such series; or (ii) any action taken or omission to act committed by NB Management in the performance of its obligations under the Agreement with respect to such series; or (iii) any action of NB Management upon instructions believed in good faith by it to have been executed by a duly authorized officer or representative of the Registrant with respect to such series; provided , that NB Management shall not be entitled to such indemnification in respect of actions or omissions constituting negligence or misconduct on the part of NB Management or that of its employees, agents or contractors. Before confessing any claim against it which may be subject to indemnification by a series under the Agreement, NB Management shall give such series reasonable opportunity to defend against such claim in its own name or in the name of NB Management. Section 13 of the Administration Agreement provides that NB Management will indemnify the Registrant and hold it harmless from and against any and all losses, damages and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, incurred by the Registrant that result from: (i) NB Management’s failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement; or (ii) NB Management’s lack of good faith in performing its obligations under the Agreement; or (iii) the negligence or misconduct of NB Management, or its employees, agents or contractors in connection with the Agreement. The Registrant shall not be entitled to such indemnification in respect of actions or omissions constituting negligence or misconduct on the part of the Registrant or its employees, agents or contractors other than NB Management, unless such negligence or misconduct results from or is accompanied by negligence or misconduct on the part of NB Management, any affiliated person of NB Management, or any affiliated person of an affiliated person of NB Management.

Section 11 of the Distribution Agreement between the Registrant and NB Management provides that NB Management shall look only to the assets of a class of a series for the performance of the Agreement by the Registrant on behalf of such series, and neither the Shareholders, the Trustees nor any of the Registrant’s officers, employees or agents, whether past, present or future, shall be personally liable therefor.

Section 14 of the Distribution and Services Agreement between the Registrant and NB Management provides that NB Management shall look only to the assets of a class of a series for the performance of the Agreement by the Registrant on behalf of such series, and neither the Shareholders, the Trustees nor any of the Registrant’s officers, employees or agents, whether past, present or future, shall be personally liable therefor.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”), may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion

of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The Registrant also maintains Directors and Officers Insurance.

Item 31 . Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser and Sub-Adviser.

There is set forth below information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which each director or officer of NB Management and each executive officer of NB LLC, NBFI, or NBAIM is, or at any time during the past two years has been, engaged for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee.

NAME	BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS
Andrew B. Allard General Counsel and Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Deputy General Counsel, NB LLC; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman Income Funds; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman Equity Funds; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund Inc.; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman California Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc.; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer, Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
Joseph V. Amato Chief Investment Officer (Equities) and Managing Director, NB Management	Chief Executive Officer and President, Neuberger Berman Holdings LLC (including its predecessor, Neuberger Berman Inc.); President, Chief Executive Officer, NB LLC; Director and Managing Director of NBFI ; Board member, NBFI; Trustee, Neuberger Berman Income Funds; Trustee, Neuberger Berman Equity Funds; Trustee, Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust; Trustee, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds; Director, Neuberger Berman Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Director, Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund Inc.; Director, Neuberger Berman New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Director, Neuberger Berman California Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Director, Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc.; Director, Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.; formerly, Global Head of Asset Management in the Investment Management Division, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., 2006-2009; formerly, Member of the Investment Management Division’s Executive Management Committee, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., 2006-2009.
Thanos Bardas Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBFI; Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
John J. Barker Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Ann H. Benjamin Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.

NAME	BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS
Michael L. Bowyer Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Associate Portfolio Manager.
Claudia A. Brandon Senior Vice President and Assistant Secretary, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman Equity Funds; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman Income Funds; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund Inc.; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman California Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc.; Executive Vice President and Secretary, Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
David M. Brown Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
David H. Burshtan Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Stephen Casey Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Brad E. Cetron Chief Compliance Officer, Managing Director and Director of Compliance (Broker Dealer), NB Management	Chief Compliance Officer and Managing Director, NB LLC.
Robert Conti President and Chief Executive Officer, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee, Neuberger Berman Income Funds; President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee, Neuberger Berman Equity Funds; President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee, Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust; President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Neuberger Berman Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund Inc.; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Neuberger Berman New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Neuberger Berman California Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc.; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
William R. Covode Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Timothy Creedon Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.

NAME	BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS
Robert W. D’Alelio Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Alexandre Da Silva Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Senior Vice President, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
James Dempsey Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President, NB Management	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Treasurer and Senior Vice President, NBFI
Rob Drijkoningen Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBFI; Managing Director, Neuberger Berman Europe Limited (“NBEL”); Portfolio Manager.
Ingrid Dyott Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Associate Portfolio Manager; Portfolio Manager.
Michael Foster Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Senior Vice President, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
James Gartland Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Maxine L. Gerson Secretary and Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director and Secretary, NB LLC; and Managing Director and Secretary, Neuberger Berman Holdings LLC.
Anthony Gleason Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Jennifer Gorgoll Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Richard Grau Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Senior Vice President, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Michael C. Greene Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Ian Haas Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Senior Vice President, NB Alternative Investment Management LLC (“NBAIM”); Portfolio Manager
William Hunter Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Fred Ingham Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBAIM; Portfolio Manager.

NAME	BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS
James L. Iselin Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Andrew A. Johnson Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director and Board Member, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Brian Jones Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Gerald Kaminsky Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Michael Kaminsky Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Charles Kantor Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Vera Kartseva Vice President, NB Management	Vice President, NBFI; Managing Director, NBEL; Portfolio Manager.
Hakan Kaya Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Brian Kerrane Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Vice President, NB Management	Vice President, Neuberger Berman Income Funds; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Equity Funds; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman California Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
David Kupperman Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBAIM; Portfolio Manager.
Sajjad S. Ladiwala Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Associate Portfolio Manager.
Wai Lee Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
David M. Levine Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Richard S. Levine Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.

NAME	BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS
Raoul Luttik Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBFI; Managing Director, NBEL; Portfolio Manager.
Joseph Lynch Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Jeff Majit Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBAIM; Portfolio Manager.
Thomas J. Marthaler Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
James F. McAree Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
S. Blake Miller Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Arthur Moretti Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Richard S. Nackenson Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Benjamin H. Nahum Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Thomas P. O’Reilly Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Alexandra Pomeroy Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Nish Popat Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBFI; Managing Director, NBEL; Portfolio Manager.
Douglas A. Rachlin Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Brett S. Reiner Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Associate Portfolio Manager.
Daniel D. Rosenblatt Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Conrad A. Saldanha Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Eli M. Salzmann Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Mindy Schwartzapfel Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.

NAME	BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS
Benjamin E. Segal Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Saurin Shah Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Steve S. Shigekawa Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Neil S. Siegel Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Income Funds; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Equity Funds; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman California Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc.; Vice President, Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
Yves C. Siegel Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Amit Solomon Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Thomas A. Sontag Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Mamundi Subhas Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Mark D. Sullivan Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Lihui Tang Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB Asia; Portfolio Manager.
Bradley C. Tank Chief Investment Officer (Fixed Income) and Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Kenneth J. Turek Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Gorky Urquieta Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.
Judith M. Vale Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.

NAME	BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS
Bart Van der Made Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NBFI; Managing Director, NBEL; Portfolio Manager.
Eric Weinstein Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Managing Director, NBAIM; Portfolio Manager.
Richard Werman Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB LLC; Portfolio Manager.
Chamaine Williams Chief Compliance Officer, Senior Vice President and Director of Compliance (Investment Adviser), NB Management	Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman Income Funds; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman Equity Funds; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman MLP Income Fund Inc.; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman California Intermediate Municipal Fund Inc.; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc.; Chief Compliance Officer, Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
Yulin (Frank) Yao Managing Director, NB Management	Managing Director, NB Asia; Portfolio Manager.
Ping Zhou Senior Vice President, NB Management	Senior Vice President, NB LLC; Senior Vice President, NBFI; Portfolio Manager.

The principal address of NB Management, NB LLC, NBAIM and of each of the investment companies named above, is 605 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10158. The principal address of NBFI is 190 LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603.

Information as to the directors and officers of NBFI, together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of NBFI in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-61757) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of NB LLC, together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of NB LLC in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-3908) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of NBAIM , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of NBAIM in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-60730) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-55244) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of GAMCO Investors, Inc. in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an

investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-14132) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Good Hill Partners LP, together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Good Hill Partners LP in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-70244) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Lazard Asset Management LLC, together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Lazard Asset Management LLC in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-61701) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Levin Capital Strategies, LP , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Levin Capital Strategies, LP in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-65045) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Loeb Arbitrage Management LP, together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Loeb Arbitrage Management LP in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-39572) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of MacKay Shields LLC , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of MacKay Shields LLC in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-5594) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of SLS Management, LLC, together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of SLS Management, LLC in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-78229) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Sound Point Capital Management, L.P. , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Sound Point Capital Management, L.P. in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-72515) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Turner Investments, L.P. , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Turner Investments, L.P. in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-36220) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Information as to the directors and officers of Visium Asset Management, LP , together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of Visium Asset Management, LP in the last two years, is included in its application for registration as an investment adviser on Form ADV (File No. 801-72280) filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and is incorporated by reference thereto.

Item 32 . Principal Underwriters .

(a) NB Management, the principal underwriter distributing securities of the Registrant, is also the principal underwriter and distributor for each of the following investment companies:

Neuberger Berman Advisers Management Trust

Neuberger Berman Equity Funds

Neuberger Berman Income Funds

(b) Set forth below is information concerning the directors and officers of the Registrant’s principal underwriter. The principal business address of each of the persons listed is 605 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10158-0180, which is also the address of the Registrant’s principal underwriter.

NAME

POSITIONS AND OFFICES

WITH UNDERWRITER

POSITIONS AND OFFICES

WITH REGISTRANT

Andrew B. Allard	General Counsel and Senior Vice President	Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Chief Legal Officer (only for purposes of sections 307 and 406 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)
Joseph V. Amato	Chief Investment Officer (Equities) and Managing Director	Trustee
Thanos Bardas	Managing Director	None
John J. Barker	Managing Director	None
Ann H. Benjamin	Managing Director	None
Michael L. Bowyer	Managing Director	None
Claudia A. Brandon	Senior Vice President and Assistant Secretary	Executive Vice President and Secretary
David M. Brown	Managing Director	None
David H. Burshtan	Managing Director	None
Stephen Casey	Managing Director	None
Brad E. Cetron	Chief Compliance Officer, Managing Director and Director of Compliance (Broker Dealer)	None
Robert Conti	President and Chief Executive Officer	President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
William R. Covode	Managing Director	None
Timothy Creedon	Managing Director	None
Robert W. D’Alelio	Managing Director	None
Alexandre Da Silva	Senior Vice President	None
James Dempsey	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President	None
Rob Drijkoningen	Managing Director	None
Ingrid Dyott	Managing Director	None
Michael Foster	Senior Vice President	None
James Gartland	Managing Director	None
Maxine L. Gerson	Secretary and Managing Director	None
Anthony Gleason	Managing Director	None
Jennifer Gorgoll	Managing Director	None
Richard Grau	Senior Vice President	None
Michael C. Greene	Managing Director	None

NAME

POSITIONS AND OFFICES

WITH UNDERWRITER

POSITIONS AND OFFICES

WITH REGISTRANT

Ian Haas	Senior Vice President	None
William Hunter	Senior Vice President	None
Fred Ingham	Managing Director	None
James L. Iselin	Managing Director	None
Andrew A. Johnson	Managing Director	None
Brian Jones	Senior Vice President	None
Gerald Kaminsky	Managing Director	None
Michael Kaminsky	Managing Director	None
Charles Kantor	Managing Director	None
Vera Kartseva	Vice President	None
Hakan Kaya	Managing Director	None
Brian Kerrane	Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Vice President	Vice President
David Kupperman	Managing Director	None
Sajjad S. Ladiwala	Managing Director	None
Wai Lee	Managing Director	None
David M. Levine	Senior Vice President	None
Richard S. Levine	Managing Director	None
Raoul Luttik	Managing Director	None
Joseph Lynch	Managing Director	None
Jeff Majit	Managing Director	None
Thomas J. Marthaler	Managing Director	None
James F. McAree	Senior Vice President	None
S. Blake Miller	Managing Director	None
Arthur Moretti	Managing Director	None
Richard S. Nackenson	Managing Director	None
Benjamin H. Nahum	Managing Director	None
Thomas P. O’Reilly	Managing Director	None
Alexandra Pomeroy	Managing Director	None
Nish Popat	Managing Director	None
Douglas A. Rachlin	Managing Director	None
Brett S. Reiner	Managing Director	None
Daniel D. Rosenblatt	Managing Director	None
Conrad A. Saldanha	Managing Director	None
Eli M. Salzmann	Managing Director	None
Mindy Schwartzapfel	Senior Vice President	None
Benjamin E. Segal	Managing Director	None
Saurin Shah	Managing Director	None
Steve S. Shigekawa	Managing Director	None
Neil S. Siegel	Managing Director	Vice President
Yves C. Siegel	Managing Director	None
Amit Solomon	Senior Vice President	None
Thomas A. Sontag	Managing Director	None
Mamundi Subhas	Senior Vice President	None

NAME

POSITIONS AND OFFICES

WITH UNDERWRITER

POSITIONS AND OFFICES

WITH REGISTRANT

Mark D. Sullivan	Senior Vice President	None
Lihui Tang	Managing Director	None
Bradley C. Tank	Chief Investment Officer (Fixed Income) and Managing Director	None
Kenneth J. Turek	Managing Director	None
Gorky Urquieta	Managing Director	None
Judith M. Vale	Managing Director	None
Bart Van der Made	Managing Director	None
Eric Weinstein	Managing Director	None
Richard Werman	Managing Director	None
Chamaine Williams	Chief Compliance Officer, Senior Vice President and Director of Compliance (Investment Adviser)	Chief Compliance Officer
Yulin (Frank) Yao	Managing Director	None
Ping Zhou	Senior Vice President	None

(c) No commissions or other compensation were received directly or indirectly from the Registrant by any principal underwriter who was not an affiliated person of the Registrant.

Item 33 . Location of Accounts and Records.

All accounts, books and other documents, except for the Registrant’s Trust Instrument and By-Laws, minutes of meetings of the Registrant’s Trustees and shareholders and the Registrant’s policies and contracts, required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder with respect to the Registrant are maintained at the offices of the Funds’ transfer agent and, except for the Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund, the Funds’ custodian, State Street Bank and Trust Company, 2 Avenue de Lafayette, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, and, with respect to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund, are maintained at the offices of the Fund’s custodian, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 14201 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, TX 75254, and the Fund’s subadvisers at their respective locations shown in the Statement of Additional Information.

The Registrant’s Trust Instrument and By-Laws, minutes of meetings of the Registrant’s Trustees and shareholders and the Registrant’s policies and contracts, are maintained at the offices of the Registrant, 605 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10158-0180.

Item 34 . Management Services.

Other than as set forth in Parts A and B of this Post-Effective Amendment, the Registrant is not a party to any management-related service contract.

Item 35 . Undertakings.

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for effectiveness of this registration statement under Rule 485(b) under the 1933 Act and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 33 to its Registration Statement on Form N-1A to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City and State of New York on the 30th day of December, 2013.

	NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
	By:	/s/ Robert Conti
	Name:	Robert Conti
	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the 1933 Act, Post-Effective Amendment No. 33 has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Robert Conti	President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee	December 30, 2013
Robert Conti
/s/ John M. McGovern	Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer	December 30, 2013
John M. McGovern
/s/ Joseph V. Amato	Trustee	December 30, 2013
Joseph V. Amato*
/s/ Faith Colish	Trustee	December 30, 2013
Faith Colish*
/s/ Martha C. Goss	Trustee	December 30, 2013
Martha C. Goss*
/s/ Michael M. Knetter	Trustee	December 30, 2013
Michael M. Knetter*
/s/ Howard A. Mileaf	Trustee	December 30, 2013
Howard A. Mileaf*
/s/ George W. Morriss	Trustee	December 30, 2013
George W. Morriss*

/s/ Tom D. Seip	Chairman of the Board and Trustee	December 30, 2013
Tom D. Seip*
/s/ Candace L. Straight	Trustee	December 30, 2013
Candace L. Straight*
/s/ Peter P. Trapp	Trustee	December 30, 2013
Peter P. Trapp*

*Signatures affixed by Lori L. Schneider on December 30, 2013, pursuant to a power of attorney filed with Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, File Nos. 333-122847 and 811-21715, on October 4, 2013 .

NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number (e)(4)	Description Distribution Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class R6 shares.
(h)(6)	Administration Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with respect to Class R6 shares.
(h)(13)	Expense Limitation Agreement Between Registrant and NB Management with Respect to Class R6 Shares of the Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund.
(i)	Opinion and Consent of K&L Gates LLP with Respect to Securities Matters of Registrant.
(j)	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

	NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

	/s/ Robert Conti
	By: Robert Conti
	Title: President

	NEUBERGER BERMAN MANAGEMENT LLC

	/s/ Robert Conti
	By: Robert Conti
	Title: President

	NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
	/s/ Robert Conti
	Name: Robert Conti
	Title: President
	NEUBERGER BERMAN MANAGEMENT LLC
	/s/ Robert Conti
	Name: Robert Conti
	Title: President

	Very truly yours, NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS, on behalf of NEUBERGER BERMAN ABSOLUTE RETURN MULTI-MANAGER FUND

Fund	Class	Limitation Period	Expense Limitation

Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund	R6	10/31/2016	1.90%

	(i)	the prospectus and statement of additional information (collectively, the “ Prospectus ”) filed as part of the Post-Effective Amendment;

	(ii)	the Trust’s certificate of trust, governing instrument, and bylaws in effect on the date of this opinion letter; and

	(iii)	the resolutions adopted by the trustees of the Trust relating to the Post-Effective Amendment, the establishment and designation of the Fund and the Shares, and the authorization for issuance and sale of the Shares.