UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: |
June 30, 2010 |
Or
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: |
|
to |
|
Commission File Number: |
001-11954 |
|
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
|
22-1657560 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
888 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York |
|
10019 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(212) 894-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
x Large Accelerated Filer |
|
o Accelerated Filer |
o Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
|
o Smaller Reporting Company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of June 30, 2010, 182,290,243 of the registrants common shares of beneficial interest are outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I. |
|
|
Financial Information: |
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the |
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Condition and Results of Operations |
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II. |
|
|
Other Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Exhibits |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Index |
|
|
|
|
72 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
3
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
4
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
Other |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares |
|
Common Shares |
|
Additional |
|
Less Than |
|
Comprehensive |
|
controlling |
|
Total |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Distributions |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Interests |
|
Equity |
|||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
33,954 |
|
$ |
823,807 |
|
|
155,286 |
|
$ |
6,195 |
|
$ |
6,025,976 |
|
$ |
(1,047,340) |
|
$ |
(6,899) |
|
$ |
412,913 |
|
$ |
6,214,652 |
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
102,475 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,700) |
|
|
98,775 |
||
Dividends paid on common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,849 |
|
|
194 |
|
|
188,792 |
|
|
(315,159) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(126,173) |
|
Dividends paid on preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(28,540) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(28,540) |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
common shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,250 |
|
|
690 |
|
|
709,536 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
710,226 |
|
Conversion of Series A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
preferred shares to common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(89) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
89 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred compensation shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
and options |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
9,967 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
9,969 |
|
Common shares issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Upon redemption of Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Partnership units, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at redemption value |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
49,944 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
49,990 |
|
Under employees' share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
option plan |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
8 |
|
|
(14) |
|
|
548 |
|
|
(351) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
183 |
Change in unrealized net gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
or loss on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
available-for-sale |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(12,213) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(12,213) |
|
Our share of partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities OCI adjustments |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(16,556) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(16,556) |
|
Voluntary surrender of equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
awards on March 31, 2009 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,588 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,588 |
|
Adjustments to redeemable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Class A Operating Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
units |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
194,183 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
194,183 |
|
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(646) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
(183) |
|
|
(4,086) |
|
|
(4,909) |
||
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
33,952 |
|
$ |
823,718 |
|
|
178,562 |
|
$ |
7,113 |
|
$ |
7,210,977 |
|
$ |
(1,288,909) |
|
$ |
(35,851) |
|
$ |
405,127 |
|
$ |
7,122,175 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
33,952 |
|
$ |
823,686 |
|
|
181,214 |
|
$ |
7,218 |
|
$ |
6,961,007 |
|
$ |
(1,577,591) |
|
$ |
28,449 |
|
$ |
406,637 |
|
$ |
6,649,406 |
||
Net income |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
286,658 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
287,852 |
||
Dividends paid on common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(236,279) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(236,279) |
|
Dividends paid on preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(28,533) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(28,533) |
|
Conversion of Series A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
preferred shares to common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
(3) |
|
|
(152) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
152 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred compensation shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
and options |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,906 |
|
Common shares issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Upon redemption of Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Partnership units, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at redemption value |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
495 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
35,691 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
35,711 |
|
Under employees' share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
option plan |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
548 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
8,989 |
|
|
(25,433) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(16,422) |
|
Under dividend reinvestment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plan |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
801 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
802 |
Change in unrealized net gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
or loss on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
available-for-sale |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
25,531 |
|
|
- |
|
|
25,531 |
|
Our share of partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities OCI adjustments |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(15,965) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(15,965) |
|
Adjustments to redeemable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Class A Operating Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
units |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(66,075) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(66,075) |
|
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(60) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(418) |
|
|
(545) |
|
|
(1,021) |
||
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
|
|
33,949 |
|
$ |
823,534 |
|
|
182,290 |
|
$ |
7,262 |
|
$ |
6,944,410 |
|
$ |
(1,581,176) |
|
$ |
37,597 |
|
$ |
407,286 |
|
$ |
6,638,913 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited). |
5
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
||||||||
(UNAUDITED) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
||||
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
||||
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
309,755 |
|
$ |
116,056 |
||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of deferred financing costs) |
|
|
280,058 |
|
|
277,806 |
|
|
Equity in income of partially owned entities, including Alexander’s and Toys “R” Us |
|
|
(114,664) |
|
|
(91,227) |
|
|
Straight-lining of rental income |
|
|
(38,557) |
|
|
(53,002) |
|
|
Amortization of below market leases, net |
|
|
(32,209) |
|
|
(37,542) |
|
|
Distributions of income from partially owned entities |
|
|
18,517 |
|
|
15,131 |
|
|
Other non-cash adjustments |
|
|
17,007 |
|
|
25,069 |
|
|
Litigation loss accrual |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Net gain on dispositions of assets other than depreciable real estate |
|
|
(7,687) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Net gain resulting from Lexington Realty Trust’s March 2010 stock issuance |
|
|
(5,998) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Net loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
(23,589) |
|
|
Mezzanine loans loss accrual |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
122,738 |
|
|
Write-off of unamortized costs from the voluntary surrender of equity awards |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,588 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(400) |
|
|
15,654 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
53,598 |
|
|
(17,773) |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
23,576 |
|
|
7,715 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
11,341 |
|
|
(10,185) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
532,365 |
|
|
379,439 |
||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
133,888 |
|
|
60,786 |
|
|
Proceeds from sales of, and return of investment in, marketable securities |
|
|
122,956 |
|
|
9,115 |
|
|
Proceeds from repayment of mezzanine loans receivable |
|
|
105,061 |
|
|
45,472 |
|
|
Additions to real estate |
|
|
(68,925) |
|
|
(84,750) |
|
|
Development costs and construction in progress |
|
|
(68,499) |
|
|
(267,124) |
|
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate and related investments |
|
|
49,544 |
|
|
43,873 |
|
|
Investments in mezzanine loans receivable and other |
|
|
(48,339) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Investments in partially owned entities |
|
|
(41,920) |
|
|
(25,712) |
|
|
Proceeds from maturing short-term investments |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Deposits in connection with real estate acquisitions |
|
|
(15,128) |
|
|
991 |
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(13,917) |
|
|
(11,597) |
|
|
Distributions of capital from partially owned entities |
|
|
12,638 |
|
|
9,636 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
207,359 |
|
|
(219,310) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited). |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED |
||||||||
(UNAUDITED) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
||||
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
||||
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Repayments of borrowings |
|
$ |
(1,197,525) |
|
$ |
(644,011) |
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
901,040 |
|
|
520,137 |
|
|
Dividends paid on common shares |
|
|
(236,279) |
|
|
(126,174) |
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred shares |
|
|
(28,533) |
|
|
(28,540) |
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(27,665) |
|
|
(20,931) |
|
|
Repurchase of shares related to stock compensation agreements and related tax wit h holdings |
|
|
(15,396) |
|
|
(522) |
|
|
Purchases of outstanding preferred units |
|
|
(13,000) |
|
|
(24,331) |
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(5,724) |
|
|
(4,338) |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
710,226 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(623,082) |
|
|
381,516 |
||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
116,642 |
|
|
541,645 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
535,479 |
|
|
1,526,853 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
652,121 |
|
$ |
2,068,498 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cash payments for interests (including capitalized interest of $875 and $10,078) |
|
$ |
270,997 |
|
$ |
321,065 |
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes |
|
$ |
3,861 |
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Adjustments to redeemable Class A Operating Partnership units |
|
$ |
(66,075) |
|
$ |
194,183 |
|
|
Conversion of Class A Operating Partnership units to common shares, at redemption value |
|
|
35,711 |
|
|
49,990 |
|
|
Unrealized net gain (loss) on sale of securities available for sale |
|
|
25,531 |
|
|
(12,213) |
|
|
Extinguishment of a liability in connection with the acquisition of real estate |
|
|
20,500 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Dividends paid in common shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
188,986 |
|
|
Unit distributions paid in Class A units |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited). |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Organization
Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”) is a fully‑integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and conducts its business through Vornado Realty L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). Vornado is the sole general partner of, and owned approximately 92.5% of the common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership at June 30, 2010. All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and “Vornado” refer to Vornado Realty Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership.
Substantially all of Vornado’s assets are held through subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Accordingly, Vornado’s cash flow and ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is dependent upon the cash flow of the Operating Partnership and the ability of its direct and indirect subsidiaries to first satisfy their obligations to creditors.
On July 8, 2010, we completed the first closing of Vornado Capital Partners, L.P., our real estate investment fund (the “Fund”) with initial equity commitments of $550,000,000, of which we committed $200,000,000. We expect to raise an additional $450,000,000 bringing total commitments to $1 billion. We serve as the general partner and investment manager of the Fund and it will be our exclusive investment vehicle during its three-year investment period for all investments that fit within the Fund’s investment parameters. The Fund’s investment parameters include debt, equity and other interests in real estate, and excludes (i) investments in vacant land and ground-up development; (ii) investments acquired by merger or primarily for our securities or properties; (iii) properties which can be combined with or relate to our existing properties; (iv) securities of commercial mortgage loan servicers and investments derived from any such investments; (v) non-controlling interests in equity and debt securities; and (vi) investments located outside of North America. The Fund has a term of eight years from the final closing date. In the six months ended June 30, 2010, we expensed $2,730,000 of Fund organization costs, which is included as a component of “general and administrative” expenses on our consolidated statement of income, and expect to incur additional expenses of approximately $3,700,000 in the third quarter of 2010.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and include the accounts of Vornado, and the Operating Partnership and its consolidated partially owned entities. All intercompany amounts have been eliminated. In our opinion, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and changes in cash flows have been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. We have made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
3. Recently Issued Accounting Literature
On January 21, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , adding new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements and additional disclosures about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements. The application of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810, Consolidation , which modifies the existing quantitative guidance used in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) by requiring entities to qualitatively assess whether an enterprise is a primary beneficiary, based on whether the entity has (i) power over the significant activities of the VIE, and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
8
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4. Investments in Partially Owned Entities
Toys “R” Us (“Toys”)
As of June 30, 2010, we own 32.7% of Toys. The business of Toys is highly seasonal. Historically, Toys’ fourth quarter net income accounts for more than 80% of its fiscal year net income. We account for our investment in Toys under the equity method and record our 32.7% share of Toys net income or loss on a one-quarter lag basis because Toys’ fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest January 31, and our fiscal year ends on December 31. As of June 30, 2010, the carrying amount of our investment in Toys does not differ materially from our share of the equity in the net assets of Toys on a purchase accounting basis.
On May 28, 2010, Toys filed a registration statement with the SEC for the offering and sale of its common stock. The offering, if completed, would result in a reduction of our percentage ownership of Toys’ equity. The size of the offering and its completion are subject to market and other conditions.
Below is a summary of Toys’ latest available financial information on a purchase accounting basis:
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
||||||
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
|||||
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,410,000 |
|
$ |
12,589,000 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,877,000 |
|
|
11,198,000 |
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
112,000 |
|
|
|
|
Toys “R” Us, Inc. equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,533,000 |
|
|
1,279,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
For the Six |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
Income Statement: |
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
||||||
|
|
Total revenues |
$ |
2,608,000 |
|
$ |
2,477,000 |
|
$ |
8,465,000 |
|
$ |
7,938,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Toys |
$ |
(71,000) |
|
$ |
(50,000) |
|
$ |
308,000 |
|
$ |
242,000 |
|
As of June 30, 2010, we own 32.4% of the outstanding common stock of Alexander’s. We manage, lease and develop Alexander’s properties pursuant to agreements which expire in March of each year and are automatically renewable. As of June 30, 2010, Alexander’s owed us $58,817,000 in fees under these agreements.
Based on Alexander’s June 30, 2010 closing share price of $302.92, the market value (“fair value” pursuant to ASC 820) of our investment in Alexander’s is $501,050,000, or $302,732,000 in excess of the June 30, 2010 carrying amount on our consolidated balance sheet. As of June 30, 2010, the carrying amount of our investment in Alexander’s, excluding amounts owed to us, exceeds our share of the equity in the net assets of Alexander’s by approximately $60,169,000. The majority of this basis difference resulted from the excess of our purchase price for the Alexander’s common stock acquired over the book value of Alexander’s net assets. Substantially all of this basis difference was allocated, based on our estimates of the fair values of Alexander’s assets and liabilities, to the real estate (land and buildings). The basis difference related to the buildings is being amortized over their estimated useful lives as an adjustment to our equity in net income of Alexander’s. This amortization is not material to our share of equity in Alexander’s net income or loss. The basis difference related to the land will be recognized upon disposition of our investment.
9
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4. Investments in Partially Owned Entities - continued
Alexander’s, Inc. (“Alexander’s”) (NYSE: ALX) – continued
Below is a summary of Alexander’s latest available financial information:
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
||||||
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||||
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,696,000 |
|
$ |
1,704,000 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,363,000 |
|
|
1,389,000 |
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
313,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
For the Six |
|
||||||||
|
|
Months Ended |
|
Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
Income Statement: |
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
||||||
|
|
Total revenues |
$ |
59,000 |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
$ |
118,000 |
|
$ |
108,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Alexander’s |
$ |
15,000 |
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
$ |
31,000 |
|
$ |
59,000 |
|
Lexington Realty Trust (“Lexington”) (NYSE: LXP)
As of June 30, 2010, we own 18,468,969 Lexington common shares, or approximately 13.8% of Lexington’s common equity. We account for our investment in Lexington on the equity method because we believe we have the ability to exercise significant influence over Lexington’s operating and financial policies, based on, among other factors, our representation on Lexington’s Board of Trustees and the level of our ownership in Lexington as compared to other shareholders. We record our pro rata share of Lexington’s net income or loss on a one-quarter lag basis because we file our consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K and 10-Q prior to the time that Lexington files its financial statements.
Based on Lexington’s June 30, 2010 closing share price of $6.01, the market value (“fair value” pursuant to ASC 820) of our investment in Lexington was $110,999,000, or $55,355,000 in excess of the June 30, 2010 carrying amount on our consolidated balance sheet. As of June 30, 2010, the carrying amount of our investment in Lexington was less than our share of the equity in the net assets of Lexington by approximately $71,885,000. This basis difference resulted primarily from $107,882,000 of non-cash impairment charges recognized during 2008, partially offset by purchase accounting for our acquisition of an additional 8,000,000 common shares of Lexington in October 2008, of which the majority relates to our estimate of the fair values of Lexington’s real estate (land and buildings) as compared to the carrying amounts in Lexington’s consolidated financial statements. The basis difference related to the buildings is being amortized over their estimated useful lives as an adjustment to our equity in net income or loss of Lexington. This amortization is not material to our share of equity in Lexington’s net income or loss. The basis difference attributable to the land will be recognized upon disposition of our investment. Below is a summary of Lexington’s latest available financial information:
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|||||
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|||
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,537,000 |
|
$ |
3,702,000 |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,199,000 |
|
|
2,344,000 |
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252,000 |
|
|
1,264,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||
|
Income Statement: |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|||||
|
|
Total revenues |
$ |
89,000 |
|
$ |
93,000 |
|
$ |
179,000 |
|
$ |
192,000 |
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Lexington |
$ |
(27,000) |
|
$ |
(65,000) |
|
$ |
(73,000) |
|
$ |
(79,000) |
|
10
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
11
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
12
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
13
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Marketable Securities
The carrying amount of marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheets and their corresponding fair values at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had $37,175,000 and $13,026,000, respectively, of gross unrealized gains. There were no unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and $1,223,000 of gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2009.
6. Mezzanine Loans Receivable
The following is a summary of our investments in mezzanine loans as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
14
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
7. Identified Intangible Assets and Intangible Liabilities
The following summarizes our identified intangible assets (primarily acquired above-market leases) and intangible liabilities (primarily acquired below-market leases) as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
Balance as of |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
Identified intangible assets (included in other assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount |
$ |
742,453 |
|
$ |
755,467 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
(338,372) |
|
|
(312,957) |
|
|
Net |
$ |
404,081 |
|
$ |
442,510 |
|
|
Identified intangible liabilities (included in deferred credit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount |
$ |
928,349 |
|
$ |
942,968 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
(331,657) |
|
|
(309,476) |
|
|
Net |
$ |
596,692 |
|
$ |
633,492 |
|
Amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases resulted in an increase to rental income of $16,302,000 and $19,560,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $32,209,000 and $37,542,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases for each of the five succeeding years commencing January 1, 2011 is as follows:
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
$ |
58,657 |
|
|
2012 |
|
54,359 |
|
|
2013 |
|
46,429 |
|
|
2014 |
|
40,471 |
|
|
2015 |
|
37,608 |
|
Amortization of all other identified intangible assets (a component of depreciation and amortization expense) was $15,814,000 and $17,778,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $30,728,000 and $33,564,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization of all other identified intangible assets including acquired in-place leases, customer relationships, and third party contracts for each of the five succeeding years commencing January 1, 2011 is as follows:
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
$ |
51,724 |
|
|
2012 |
|
46,397 |
|
|
2013 |
|
38,908 |
|
|
2014 |
|
20,099 |
|
|
2015 |
|
14,993 |
|
We are a tenant under ground leases for certain properties. Amortization of these acquired below-market leases, net of above-market leases resulted in an increase to rent expense of $509,000 and $533,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $1,018,000 and $1,066,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization of these below-market leases, net of above-market leases for each of the five succeeding years commencing January 1, 2011 is as follows:
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
2012 |
|
2,036 |
|
|
2013 |
|
2,036 |
|
|
2014 |
|
2,036 |
|
|
2015 |
|
2,036 |
|
15
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Debt |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of our debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Rate at |
|
Balance at |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
Notes and mortgages payable: |
Maturity (1) |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||||
|
Fixed rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
New York Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 Park Avenue |
01/12 |
|
5.48% |
|
$ |
430,000 |
|
$ |
430,000 |
|
|
|
1290 Avenue of the Americas |
01/13 |
|
5.97% |
|
|
429,417 |
|
|
434,643 |
|
|
|
770 Broadway |
03/16 |
|
5.65% |
|
|
353,000 |
|
|
353,000 |
|
|
|
888 Seventh Avenue |
01/16 |
|
5.71% |
|
|
318,554 |
|
|
318,554 |
|
|
|
Two Penn Plaza |
02/11 |
|
4.97% |
|
|
279,932 |
|
|
282,492 |
|
|
|
909 Third Avenue |
04/15 |
|
5.64% |
|
|
208,862 |
|
|
210,660 |
|
|
|
Eleven Penn Plaza |
12/11 |
|
5.20% |
|
|
201,241 |
|
|
203,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, DC Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skyline Place |
02/17 |
|
5.74% |
|
|
678,000 |
|
|
678,000 |
|
|
|
Warner Building |
05/16 |
|
6.26% |
|
|
292,700 |
|
|
292,700 |
|
|
|
River House Apartments |
04/15 |
|
5.43% |
|
|
195,546 |
|
|
195,546 |
|
|
|
1215 Clark Street, 200 12th Street and 251 18th Street |
01/25 |
|
7.09% |
|
|
112,297 |
|
|
113,267 |
|
|
|
Bowen Building |
06/16 |
|
6.14% |
|
|
115,022 |
|
|
115,022 |
|
|
|
Universal Buildings |
04/14 |
|
6.36% |
|
|
104,854 |
|
|
106,630 |
|
|
|
Reston Executive I, II, and III |
01/13 |
|
5.57% |
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
2011 Crystal Drive |
08/17 |
|
7.30% |
|
|
81,845 |
|
|
82,178 |
|
|
|
1550 and 1750 Crystal Drive |
11/14 |
|
7.08% |
|
|
80,638 |
|
|
81,822 |
|
|
|
1235 Clark Street |
07/12 |
|
6.75% |
|
|
52,786 |
|
|
53,252 |
|
|
|
2231 Crystal Drive |
08/13 |
|
7.08% |
|
|
47,465 |
|
|
48,533 |
|
|
|
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue |
06/12 |
|
7.26% |
|
|
45,507 |
|
|
45,877 |
|
|
|
241 18th Street |
10/10 |
|
6.82% |
|
|
45,097 |
|
|
45,609 |
|
|
|
1225 Clark Street |
08/13 |
|
7.08% |
|
|
28,391 |
|
|
28,925 |
|
|
|
1800, 1851 and 1901 South Bell Street |
12/11 |
|
6.91% |
|
|
14,821 |
|
|
19,338 |
|
|
|
1101 17th, 1140 Connecticut, 1730 M and 1150 17th Street (2) |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
- |
|
|
85,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Springfield Mall (including present value of purchase option) (3) |
10/12-04/13 |
|
9.01% |
|
|
245,254 |
|
|
242,583 |
|
|
|
Montehiedra Town Center |
07/16 |
|
6.04% |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
Broadway Mall |
07/13 |
|
5.30% |
|
|
91,419 |
|
|
92,601 |
|
|
|
828-850 Madison Avenue Condominium |
06/18 |
|
5.29% |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
Las Catalinas Mall |
11/13 |
|
6.97% |
|
|
58,534 |
|
|
59,304 |
|
|
|
Other (4) |
12/10-05/36 |
|
4.75%-10.70% |
|
156,003 |
|
|
156,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise Mart: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise Mart |
12/16 |
|
5.57% |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
High Point Complex (5) |
09/16 |
|
10.35% |
|
|
220,456 |
|
|
217,815 |
|
|
|
Boston Design Center |
09/15 |
|
5.02% |
|
|
69,105 |
|
|
69,667 |
|
|
|
Washington Design Center |
11/11 |
|
6.95% |
|
|
43,849 |
|
|
44,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555 California Street |
09/11 |
|
5.79% |
|
|
639,754 |
|
|
664,117 |
|
|
|
Industrial Warehouses |
10/11 |
|
6.95% |
|
|
24,622 |
|
|
24,813 |
|
Total fixed rate notes and mortgages payable |
|
|
6.12% |
|
$ |
6,507,971 |
|
$ |
6,640,012 |
||
|
___________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
See notes on page 18. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
17
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Debt - continued
Notes to preceding tabular information (Amounts in thousands):
(1) Represents the extended maturity for certain loans in which we have the unilateral right, ability and intent to extend. In the case of our convertible and exchangeable debt, represents the earliest date holders may require us to repurchase the debentures.
(2) On June 1, 2010, we refinanced this loan in the same amount. The new loan, which is guaranteed by the Operating Partnership, has a rate of LIBOR plus 1.40% (1.94% at June 30, 2010) and matures in June 2011, with three one-year extension options.
(3) In the fourth quarter of 2009, we requested that the Springfield Mall mortgage loan with a principal balance of $163,554 be placed with the special servicer. In March 2010, we received notice from the special servicer that the loan was in default. We are in negotiations with the special servicer; there can be no assurance as to the timing and ultimate resolution of these negotiations.
(4) In March 2010, we requested that the mortgage loan on a California retail property with a principal balance of $17,540 be placed with the special servicer. We have not made debt service payments since March and are in default. We are in negotiations with the special servicer; there can be no assurance as to the timing and ultimate resolution of these negotiations.
(5) In March 2010, we requested that the High Point Complex mortgage loan be placed with the special servicer. We have not made debt service payments since March and are in default. We are in negotiations with the special servicer; there can be no assurance as to the timing and ultimate resolution of these negotiations.
(6) This loan bears interest at the Freddie Mac Reference Note Rate plus 1.53%.
(7) This loan has a LIBOR floor of 1.50%.
(8) This loan has a LIBOR floor of 2.00%.
(9) In June 2010, we extended the maturity date of a $50,000 construction loan to February 2011, with a one-year extension option. In addition, in July 2010, we extended the maturity date of a $36,000 loan which had matured in October 2009, to September 2010, and are in negotiations to further extend this loan.
(10) On March 26, 2010, we completed a public offering of $500,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured notes due April 1, 2015. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1, commencing on October 1, 2010. The notes were sold at 99.834% of their face amount to yield 4.287%. The notes can be redeemed without penalty beginning January 1, 2015. We retained net proceeds of approximately $496,000.
(11) These notes may be redeemed at our option in whole or in part beginning on October 1, 2014, at a price equal to the principal amount plus accrued interest. In the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we reclassified $13,866 of deferred financing costs to deferred leasing and financing costs on our consolidated balance sheet.
(12) In the second quarter of 2010, we purchased $45,251 aggregate face amount ($44,170 aggregate carrying amount) of our convertible senior debentures for $45,242 in cash, resulting in a net loss of $1,072.
(13) The net proceeds from the offering of these debentures were contributed to the Operating Partnership in the form of an inter-company loan and the Operating Partnership fully and unconditionally guaranteed payment of these debentures. There are no restrictions which limit the Operating Partnership from making distributions to Vornado and Vornado has no independent assets or operations outside of the Operating Partnership.
18
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Debt - continued
Pursuant to the provisions of ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options , below is a summary of required disclosures related to our convertible and exchangeable senior debentures.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|||||||||
Income Statement: |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|||||
$1.4 Billion Convertible Senior Debentures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon interest |
$ |
160 |
|
$ |
9,660 |
|
$ |
320 |
|
$ |
19,512 |
|
Discount amortization – original issue |
|
23 |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
2,631 |
|
Discount amortization – ASC 470-20 implementation |
|
107 |
|
|
6,111 |
|
|
215 |
|
|
12,316 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
$ |
17,076 |
|
$ |
581 |
|
$ |
34,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1 Billion Convertible Senior Debentures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon interest |
$ |
3,842 |
|
$ |
8,856 |
|
$ |
7,805 |
|
$ |
17,826 |
|
Discount amortization – original issue |
|
447 |
|
|
959 |
|
|
903 |
|
|
1,936 |
|
Discount amortization – ASC 470-20 implementation |
|
1,198 |
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
5,180 |
|
|
$ |
5,487 |
|
$ |
12,382 |
|
$ |
11,124 |
|
$ |
24,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$500 Million Exchangeable Senior Debentures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon interest |
$ |
4,844 |
|
$ |
4,844 |
|
$ |
9,688 |
|
$ |
9,688 |
|
Discount amortization – original issue |
|
384 |
|
|
375 |
|
|
762 |
|
|
733 |
|
Discount amortization – ASC 470-20 implementation |
|
1,241 |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
$ |
6,469 |
|
$ |
6,434 |
|
$ |
12,916 |
|
$ |
12,796 |
19
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
9. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets represent Operating Partnership units held by third parties and are comprised of Class A units and Series D-10, D-11, D-14 and D-15 (collectively, “Series D”) cumulative redeemable preferred units. Redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the value from period to period are charged to “additional capital” in our consolidated statements of changes in equity. Below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests.
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ |
1,177,978 |
|
|
Net income |
|
17,281 |
|
|
Distributions |
|
(20,931) |
|
|
Conversion of Class A redeemable units into common shares, at redemption value |
|
(49,990) |
|
|
Adjustment to carry Class A redeemable units at redemption value |
|
(194,183) |
|
|
Other, net |
|
5,944 |
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
$ |
936,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ |
1,251,628 |
|
|
Net income |
|
21,903 |
|
|
Distributions |
|
(27,338) |
|
|
Conversion of Class A redeemable units into common shares, at redemption value |
|
(35,711) |
|
|
Adjustment to carry Class A redeemable units at redemption value |
|
66,075 |
|
|
Redemption of Series D-12 redeemable units |
|
(13,000) |
|
|
Other, net |
|
7,356 |
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ |
1,270,913 |
|
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the aggregate redemption value of our Class A operating partnership units was $1,010,913,000 and $971,628,000, respectively.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our Series G convertible preferred units and Series D-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units, as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities and Equity , because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of Vornado common shares. Accordingly the fair value of these units is included as a component of “other liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $61,122,000 and $60,271,000 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
In March and May of 2010, we redeemed 246,153 and 553,847 Series D-12 cumulative redeemable preferred units, respectively, for $16.25 per unit in cash, or $13,000,000 in the aggregate. In connection with these redemptions, we recognized a $6,972,000 net gain, of which $4,818,000 was recognized in the second quarter of 2010. Such gain is included as a component of “net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including unit distributions,” on our consolidated statement of income.
20
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
10. Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 – observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, our fair value estimates, which are made at the end of each reporting period, may be different than the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon sale or disposition of these assets.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in our consolidated financial statements consist primarily of (i) marketable securities, (ii) the assets of our deferred compensation plan, which are primarily marketable equity securities and equity investments in limited partnerships, (iii) short-term investments (CDARS classified as available-for-sale) and (iv) mandatorily redeemable instruments (Series G convertible preferred units and Series D-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units). The tables below aggregate the fair values of financial assets and liabilities by the levels in the fair value hierarchy at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
||||||
|
|
Marketable securities |
$ |
305,292 |
|
$ |
305,292 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other assets) |
|
83,787 |
|
|
40,189 |
|
|
- |
|
|
43,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
389,079 |
|
$ |
345,481 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
43,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily redeemable instruments (included in other liabilities) |
$ |
61,122 |
|
$ |
61,122 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
||||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
||||||
|
|
Marketable equity securities |
$ |
79,925 |
|
$ |
79,925 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other assets) |
|
80,443 |
|
|
40,854 |
|
|
- |
|
|
39,589 |
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
40,000 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
200,368 |
|
$ |
160,779 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
39,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily redeemable instruments (included in other liabilities) |
$ |
60,271 |
|
$ |
60,271 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
The fair value of Level 3 “deferred compensation plan assets” represents equity investments in certain limited partnerships. The tables below summarize the changes in these assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|||||
|
Beginning balance |
$ |
43,263 |
|
$ |
32,426 |
|
$ |
39,589 |
|
$ |
34,176 |
|
|
|
Total realized/unrealized gains |
|
41 |
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, other settlements and issuances, net |
|
294 |
|
|
936 |
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
$ |
43,598 |
|
$ |
36,168 |
|
$ |
43,598 |
|
$ |
36,168 |
|
21
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
10. Fair Value Measurements - continued
Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value in our consolidated financial statements include mezzanine loans receivable and debt. Estimates of the fair values of these instruments are based on our assessments of available market information and valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analyses. The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of these financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
||||||
|
|
Mezzanine loans receivable |
$ |
136,857 |
|
$ |
128,591 |
|
$ |
203,286 |
|
$ |
192,612 |
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and mortgages payable |
$ |
8,400,599 |
|
$ |
8,236,755 |
|
$ |
8,445,766 |
|
$ |
7,858,873 |
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
1,224,866 |
|
|
1,228,601 |
|
|
711,716 |
|
|
718,302 |
|
|
|
|
Exchangeable senior debentures |
|
487,685 |
|
|
537,481 |
|
|
484,457 |
|
|
547,480 |
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
404,850 |
|
|
414,497 |
|
|
445,458 |
|
|
461,275 |
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility debt |
|
152,218 |
|
|
152,218 |
|
|
852,218 |
|
|
852,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,670,218 |
|
$ |
10,569,552 |
|
$ |
10,939,615 |
|
$ |
10,438,148 |
|
11. Discontinued Operations
The table below sets forth the combined results of operations of assets related to discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and includes the operating results of 1999 K Street, which was sold on September 1, 2009 and 15 other retail properties, which were sold during 2009.
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
||||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5,042 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,363 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5,955 |
|
12. Fee and Other Income
The following table sets forth the details of our fee and other income:
|
For The Three Months |
|
For The Six Months |
||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
||||||||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||||
Tenant cleaning fees |
$ |
13,468 |
|
$ |
12,420 |
|
$ |
27,120 |
|
$ |
25,192 |
Management and leasing fees |
|
3,380 |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
5,418 |
Lease termination fees |
|
2,841 |
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
2,748 |
Other income |
|
12,560 |
|
|
19,338 |
|
|
25,793 |
|
|
33,291 |
|
$ |
32,249 |
|
$ |
35,899 |
|
$ |
74,709 |
|
$ |
66,649 |
Fee and other income above includes management fee income from Interstate Properties, a related party, of $192,000 and $183,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $392,000 and $381,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The above table excludes fee income from partially owned entities, which is included in income from partially owned entities (see Note 4 – Investments in Partially Owned Entities).
22
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
13. Stock-based Compensation
On May 13, 2010, our shareholders approved the 2010 Omnibus Share Plan (the “Plan’), which replaces the 2002 Omnibus Share Plan. Under the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) may grant eligible participants awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted shares and other stock-based awards and operating partnership units, certain of which may provide for dividends or dividend equivalents and voting rights prior to vesting. Awards may be granted up to a maximum of 6,000,000 shares, if all awards granted are Full Value Awards, as defined, and up to 12,000,000 shares, if all of the awards granted are Not Full Value Awards, as defined. Full Value Awards are awards of securities, such as restricted shares, that, if all vesting requirements are met, do not require the payment of an exercise price or strike price to acquire the securities. Not Full Value Awards are awards of securities, such as options, that do require the payment of an exercise price or strike price. This means, for example, if the Committee were to award only restricted shares, it could award up to 6,000,000 restricted shares. On the other hand, if the Committee were to award only stock options, it could award options to purchase up to 12,000,000 shares (at the applicable exercise price). The Committee may also issue any combination of awards under the Plan, with reductions in availability of future awards made in accordance with the above limitations.
We account for all stock-based compensation in accordance ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation . Stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 consists of stock option awards, restricted stock awards, Operating Partnership unit awards and out-performance plan awards. Stock-based compensation expense was $8,480,000 and $5,651,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $14,957,000 and $15,900,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
On March 31, 2009, our nine most senior executives voluntarily surrendered their 2007 and 2008 stock option awards and their 2008 out-performance plan awards. Accordingly, we recognized $32,588,000 of expense in the first quarter of 2009 representing the unamortized portion of these awards, which is included as a component of “general and administrative” expense on our consolidated statement of income.
14. Interest and Other Investment Income (Loss), Net
The following table sets forth the details of our interest and other investment income (loss):
23
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
15. Income Per Share
The following table provides a reconciliation of both net income and the number of common shares used in the computation of (i) basic income per common share - which utilizes the weighted average number of common shares outstanding without regard to dilutive potential common shares, and (ii) diluted income per common share - which includes the weighted average common shares and potentially dilutive share equivalents. Potentially dilutive share equivalents include our Series A convertible preferred shares, employee stock options, restricted stock and exchangeable senior debentures due 2025.
24
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
16. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
For The Three Months |
|
For The Six Months |
|||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
77,211 |
|
$ |
(40,375) |
|
$ |
309,755 |
|
$ |
116,056 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
7,644 |
|
|
10,946 |
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
(28,952) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
84,855 |
|
|
(29,429) |
|
|
318,903 |
|
|
87,104 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
5,640 |
|
|
(1,853) |
|
|
23,737 |
|
|
11,236 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Vornado |
$ |
79,215 |
|
$ |
(27,576) |
|
$ |
295,166 |
|
$ |
75,868 |
|
Substantially all of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 relates to income or loss from the mark-to-market of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale and our share of other comprehensive income or loss of partially owned entities.
17. Retirement Plan
In the first quarter of 2009, we finalized the termination of the Merchandise Mart Properties Pension Plan, which resulted in a $2,800,000 pension settlement expense that is included as a component of general and administrative expense on our consolidated statement of income.
18. Subsequent Event
On July 29, 2010, as part of LNR Property Corporations (LNR) recapitalization, we acquired a 26.2% equity interest in LNR for a new investment of $116,000,000 in cash and conversion into equity of our mezzanine loan made to LNRs parent, Riley HoldCo Corp. At June 30, 2010, the carrying amount of the loan was $15,000,000, after a $52,537,000 loss accrual recognized in 2009 and $6,900,000 in the current quarter. LNR is the industry leading servicer and special servicer of commercial mortgage loans and CMBS and a diversified real estate, investment, finance and management company. We will account for our investment in LNR on the equity method from the date of the recapitalization.
25
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
19. Commitments and Contingencies
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and all risk property and rental value insurance with limits of $2.0 billion per occurrence, including coverage for terrorist acts, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods. Our California properties have earthquake insurance with coverage of $150,000,000 per occurrence, subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property, up to a $150,000,000 annual aggregate.
Penn Plaza Insurance Company, LLC (“PPIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a re-insurer with respect to a portion of our earthquake insurance coverage and as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) acts, as defined by TRIPRA. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to PPIC. Our coverage for NBCR losses is up to $2 billion per occurrence, for which PPIC is responsible for a deductible of $3,200,000 and 15% of the balance of a covered loss and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 85% of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss borne by PPIC.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years.
Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties which are non-recourse to us, senior unsecured notes, exchangeable senior debentures, convertible senior debentures and revolving credit agreements contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain it could adversely affect our ability to finance and/or refinance our properties and expand our portfolio.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us. However, in certain cases we have provided guarantees or master leased tenant space. These guarantees and master leases terminate either upon the satisfaction of specified circumstances or repayment of the underlying loans. As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate dollar amount of these guarantees and master leases is approximately $254,042,000.
At June 30, 2010, $21,947,000 of letters of credit were outstanding under one of our revolving credit facilities. Our credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum interest coverage and maximum debt to market capitalization ratios, and provide for higher interest rates in the event of a decline in our ratings below Baa3/BBB. Our credit facilities also contain customary conditions precedent to borrowing, including representations and warranties and also contain customary events of default that could give rise to accelerated repayment, including such items as failure to pay interest or principal.
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. The environmental assessments did not reveal any material environmental contamination. However, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant costs to us.
We are committed to fund additional capital to certain of our partially owned entities aggregating approximately $217,800,000, of which $200,000,000 is committed to our real estate Fund.
As part of the process of obtaining the required approvals to demolish and develop our 220 Central Park South property into a new residential tower, we have committed to fund the estimated project cost of approximately $400,000,000 to $425,000,000.
26
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
19. Commitments and Contingencies - continued
Litigation
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters, including the matters referred to below, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On January 8, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (“USDC-NJ”) claiming that we had no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $5,000,000 of annual rent from Stop & Shop pursuant to the Master Agreement and Guaranty, because of the expiration of the East Brunswick, Jersey City, Middletown, Union and Woodbridge leases to which the $5,000,000 of additional rent was previously allocated. Stop & Shop asserted that a prior order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York dated February 6, 2001, as modified on appeal to the District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 13, 2001, froze our right to reallocate which effectively terminated our right to collect the additional rent from Stop & Shop. On March 3, 2003, after we moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Stop & Shop voluntarily withdrew its complaint. On March 26, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a new complaint in New York State Supreme Court, asserting substantially the same claims as in its USDC-NJ complaint. We removed the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In January 2005 that court remanded the action to the New York State Supreme Court. On February 14, 2005, we served an answer in which we asserted a counterclaim seeking a judgment for all the unpaid additional rent accruing through the date of the judgment and a declaration that Stop & Shop will continue to be liable for the additional rent as long as any of the leases subject to the Master Agreement and Guaranty remain in effect. On May 17, 2005, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On July 15, 2005, Stop & Shop opposed our motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued its decision denying the motions for summary judgment. Both parties appealed the Court’s decision and on December 14, 2006, the Appellate Court division issued a decision affirming the Court’s decision. On January 16, 2007, we filed a motion for the reconsideration of one aspect of the Appellate Court’s decision which was denied on March 13, 2007. Discovery is now complete. On October 19, 2009, Stop & Shop filed a motion for leave to amend its pleadings to assert new claims for relief, including a claim for damages in an unspecified amount, and an additional affirmative defense. On April 26, 2010, Stop and Shop’s motion was denied. We anticipate that a trial date will be set for some time in 2010. We intend to continue to vigorously pursue our claims against Stop & Shop. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 24, 2007, we acquired a 70% controlling interest in 1290 Avenue of the Americas and the 555 California Street complex. Our 70% interest was acquired through the purchase of all of the shares of a group of foreign companies that own, through U.S. entities, the 1% sole general partnership interest and a 69% limited partnership interest in the partnerships that own the two properties. The remaining 30% limited partnership interest is owned by Donald J. Trump. In August 2005, Mr. Trump brought a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against, among others, the general partners of the partnerships referred to above relating to a dispute over the sale of properties located on the former Penn Central rail yards between West 59th and 72nd Streets in Manhattan which were formerly owned by the partnerships. In decisions issued in 2006, 2007 and 2009, the New York State Supreme Court dismissed all of Mr. Trump’s claims, and those decisions were affirmed by the Appellate Division. Mr. Trump cannot further appeal those decisions. In April 2010, Mr. Trump notified us of his intent to file a new suit claiming, among other things, that the limited partnerships should be dissolved. On April 29, 2010, we filed a motion for declaratory judgment in New York courts seeking to dispose of this claim. In June 2010, our motion was granted and a final judgment was entered that disposed of Mr. Trump’s claims with prejudice.
In July 2005, we acquired H Street Building Corporation (“H Street”) which has a subsidiary that owns, among other things, a 50% tenancy in common interest in land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as "Pentagon Row," leased to two tenants, Street Retail, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. In April 2007, H Street acquired the remaining 50% interest in that fee. On September 25, 2008, both tenants filed suit against us and the former owners claiming the right of first offer to purchase the fee interest, damages in excess of $75,000,000 and punitive damages. In April 2010, the Trial Court entered judgment in favor of the tenants, that we sell the land to the tenants for a net sales price of $14,992,000, representing the Trial Court’s allocation of our purchase price for H Street. The request for damages and punitive damages was denied. We have filed a notice of appeal and the Trial Court’s judgment is stayed pending the appeal. As a result of the Trial Court’s decision, we recorded a $10,056,000 loss accrual in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily representing previously recognized rental income.
27
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
20. Segment Information
Below is a summary of net income and a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA (1) by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
541,839 |
|
$ |
195,248 |
|
$ |
146,059 |
|
$ |
97,000 |
|
$ |
60,932 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
42,600 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
12,824 |
|
|
6,387 |
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
847 |
|
|
- |
|
|
292 |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
868 |
|
|
(687) |
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
(59) |
|
|
- |
|
|
555 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
16,302 |
|
|
9,134 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,581 |
Total rentals |
|
|
575,776 |
|
|
211,637 |
|
|
147,613 |
|
|
109,763 |
|
|
61,735 |
|
|
- |
|
|
45,028 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
88,080 |
|
|
32,431 |
|
|
13,376 |
|
|
36,073 |
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,263 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
13,468 |
|
|
20,639 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,171) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
321 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(737) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
428 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
12,560 |
|
|
4,513 |
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
784 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,145 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
696,105 |
|
|
272,910 |
|
|
168,510 |
|
|
147,648 |
|
|
66,509 |
|
|
- |
|
|
40,528 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
267,925 |
|
|
111,055 |
|
|
52,052 |
|
|
56,604 |
|
|
31,812 |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,402 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
135,265 |
|
|
44,271 |
|
|
36,533 |
|
|
27,714 |
|
|
12,674 |
|
|
- |
|
|
14,073 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
49,582 |
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
6,827 |
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
- |
|
|
24,607 |
||
Litigation loss accrual and acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
costs |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,930 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
454,702 |
|
|
160,093 |
|
|
94,785 |
|
|
91,145 |
|
|
51,667 |
|
|
- |
|
|
57,012 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
241,403 |
|
|
112,817 |
|
|
73,725 |
|
|
56,503 |
|
|
14,842 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(16,484) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
- |
|
|
198 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,673 |
||
Loss applicable to Toys |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
- |
||
(Loss) income from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
(2,614) |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
188 |
|
|
931 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,930) |
|
Interest and other investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,492 |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(149,887) |
|
|
(33,047) |
|
|
(34,304) |
|
|
(21,000) |
|
|
(16,255) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(45,281) |
||
Net loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
Net gain on disposition of wholly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
owned and partially owned assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than depreciable real estate |
|
|
4,382 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(31) |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,413 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
82,150 |
|
|
81,270 |
|
|
39,632 |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
(1,377) |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
(53,189) |
||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(4,939) |
|
|
(335) |
|
|
620 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(402) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,822) |
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
77,211 |
|
|
80,935 |
|
|
40,252 |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
(1,779) |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
(58,011) |
||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
(5,105) |
|
|
(2,556) |
|
|
- |
|
|
256 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,805) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
72,106 |
|
|
78,379 |
|
|
40,252 |
|
|
37,074 |
|
|
(1,779) |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
(60,816) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
207,512 |
|
|
31,595 |
|
|
34,943 |
|
|
22,526 |
|
|
16,478 |
|
|
42,093 |
|
|
59,877 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
184,103 |
|
|
42,736 |
|
|
39,694 |
|
|
28,500 |
|
|
12,785 |
|
|
34,444 |
|
|
25,944 |
||
Income tax (benefit) expense (2) |
|
|
(19,140) |
|
|
335 |
|
|
(617) |
|
|
- |
|
|
402 |
|
|
(24,123) |
|
|
4,863 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
444,581 |
|
$ |
153,045 |
|
$ |
114,272 |
|
$ |
88,100 |
|
$ |
27,886 |
|
$ |
31,410 |
|
$ |
29,868 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on page 32.
28
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
20. Segment Information – continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
512,696 |
|
$ |
190,226 |
|
$ |
133,424 |
|
$ |
89,083 |
|
$ |
60,954 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
39,009 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
13,297 |
|
|
7,474 |
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
652 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(146) |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
767 |
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
4,109 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
- |
|
|
171 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
19,560 |
|
|
9,885 |
|
|
946 |
|
|
8,267 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
- |
|
|
450 |
Total rentals |
|
|
554,516 |
|
|
208,352 |
|
|
141,171 |
|
|
103,620 |
|
|
61,889 |
|
|
- |
|
|
39,484 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
83,375 |
|
|
32,092 |
|
|
14,514 |
|
|
30,148 |
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,109 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
12,420 |
|
|
17,818 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(5,398) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
999 |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
413 |
|
|
(43) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(339) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
256 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
19,338 |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,554 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
673,790 |
|
|
264,875 |
|
|
163,084 |
|
|
135,470 |
|
|
67,951 |
|
|
- |
|
|
42,410 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
269,711 |
|
|
109,646 |
|
|
54,514 |
|
|
53,419 |
|
|
34,470 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,662 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
136,686 |
|
|
43,153 |
|
|
34,186 |
|
|
28,784 |
|
|
13,767 |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,796 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
49,632 |
|
|
4,531 |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,218 |
||
Total expenses |
|
|
456,029 |
|
|
157,330 |
|
|
94,260 |
|
|
88,596 |
|
|
55,167 |
|
|
- |
|
|
60,676 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
217,761 |
|
|
107,545 |
|
|
68,824 |
|
|
46,874 |
|
|
12,784 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(18,266) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
6,614 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
- |
|
|
262 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,159 |
||
Loss applicable to Toys |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
- |
||
(Loss) income from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
(22,797) |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
794 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(26,922) |
|
Interest and other investment (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
(98,153) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
179 |
|
|
(198) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(98,415) |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(159,063) |
|
|
(33,356) |
|
|
(31,109) |
|
|
(22,609) |
|
|
(12,964) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(59,025) |
||
Net gain on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
17,684 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,684 |
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(38,281) |
|
|
75,874 |
|
|
39,938 |
|
|
25,123 |
|
|
(104) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(178,785) |
||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,457) |
|
|
(260) |
|
|
(755) |
|
|
(111) |
|
|
(665) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,666) |
||
(Loss) income from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
operations |
|
|
(43,738) |
|
|
75,614 |
|
|
39,183 |
|
|
25,012 |
|
|
(769) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(182,451) |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
3,363 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
||
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(40,375) |
|
|
75,614 |
|
|
41,367 |
|
|
26,191 |
|
|
(769) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(182,451) |
||
Net loss (income) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
(1,744) |
|
|
- |
|
|
497 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,987 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
(37,635) |
|
|
73,870 |
|
|
41,367 |
|
|
26,688 |
|
|
(769) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(178,464) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
197,512 |
|
|
31,675 |
|
|
32,237 |
|
|
24,459 |
|
|
13,190 |
|
|
15,578 |
|
|
80,373 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
181,528 |
|
|
41,969 |
|
|
35,904 |
|
|
29,625 |
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
31,754 |
|
|
28,393 |
||
Income tax (benefit) expense (2) |
|
|
(3,784) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
761 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
(9,634) |
|
|
4,053 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
337,621 |
|
$ |
147,774 |
|
$ |
110,269 |
|
$ |
80,883 |
|
$ |
26,969 |
|
$ |
37,371 |
|
$ |
(65,645) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on page 32.
29
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
20. Segment Information – continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
1,065,960 |
|
$ |
387,852 |
|
$ |
285,939 |
|
$ |
192,764 |
|
$ |
122,376 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
77,029 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
26,324 |
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
7,508 |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
- |
|
|
483 |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
12,233 |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
6,674 |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
- |
|
|
965 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
32,209 |
|
|
18,339 |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
9,498 |
|
|
(106) |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,131 |
Total rentals |
|
|
1,136,726 |
|
|
421,240 |
|
|
292,879 |
|
|
216,444 |
|
|
124,555 |
|
|
- |
|
|
81,608 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
181,001 |
|
|
65,683 |
|
|
29,126 |
|
|
73,716 |
|
|
8,024 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,452 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
27,120 |
|
|
41,057 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(13,937) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
10,480 |
|
|
545 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,388) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
528 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
25,793 |
|
|
8,923 |
|
|
10,922 |
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,361 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,392,436 |
|
|
542,778 |
|
|
343,935 |
|
|
296,344 |
|
|
137,283 |
|
|
- |
|
|
72,096 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
546,980 |
|
|
226,104 |
|
|
108,715 |
|
|
110,178 |
|
|
71,031 |
|
|
- |
|
|
30,952 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
271,089 |
|
|
87,978 |
|
|
73,216 |
|
|
55,695 |
|
|
26,029 |
|
|
- |
|
|
28,171 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
98,312 |
|
|
9,346 |
|
|
12,097 |
|
|
13,832 |
|
|
14,411 |
|
|
- |
|
|
48,626 |
||
Litigation loss accrual and acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
costs |
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
- |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,930 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
928,367 |
|
|
323,428 |
|
|
204,084 |
|
|
179,705 |
|
|
111,471 |
|
|
- |
|
|
109,679 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
464,069 |
|
|
219,350 |
|
|
139,851 |
|
|
116,639 |
|
|
25,812 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(37,583) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
13,526 |
|
|
388 |
|
|
- |
|
|
409 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,729 |
||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
- |
||
Income (loss) from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
(4) |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
231 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,320) |
|
Interest and other investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
18,584 |
|
|
327 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,991 |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(289,622) |
|
|
(65,733) |
|
|
(68,788) |
|
|
(38,899) |
|
|
(29,042) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(87,160) |
||
Net loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
Net gain on disposition of wholly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
owned and partially owned assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than depreciable real estate |
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
765 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,922 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
320,308 |
|
|
156,584 |
|
|
71,109 |
|
|
80,451 |
|
|
(2,209) |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
(90,493) |
||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(10,553) |
|
|
(809) |
|
|
(100) |
|
|
(35) |
|
|
(596) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9,013) |
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
309,755 |
|
|
155,775 |
|
|
71,009 |
|
|
80,416 |
|
|
(2,805) |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
(99,506) |
||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
(23,097) |
|
|
(4,848) |
|
|
- |
|
|
498 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(18,747) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
286,658 |
|
|
150,927 |
|
|
71,009 |
|
|
80,914 |
|
|
(2,805) |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
(118,253) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
403,699 |
|
|
62,587 |
|
|
70,114 |
|
|
41,880 |
|
|
29,487 |
|
|
83,233 |
|
|
116,398 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
370,252 |
|
|
84,810 |
|
|
79,535 |
|
|
57,311 |
|
|
26,267 |
|
|
69,771 |
|
|
52,558 |
||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
36,566 |
|
|
809 |
|
|
107 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
655 |
|
|
25,587 |
|
|
9,373 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
1,097,175 |
|
$ |
299,133 |
|
$ |
220,765 |
|
$ |
180,140 |
|
$ |
53,604 |
|
$ |
283,457 |
|
$ |
60,076 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on page 32.
30
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
20. Segment Information – continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
1,019,779 |
|
$ |
378,988 |
|
$ |
262,798 |
|
$ |
177,233 |
|
$ |
123,955 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
76,805 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
26,793 |
|
|
14,189 |
|
|
5,775 |
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(57) |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
20,189 |
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
7,069 |
|
|
10,417 |
|
|
293 |
|
|
- |
|
|
103 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
37,542 |
|
|
19,808 |
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
13,536 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,109 |
Total rentals |
|
|
1,104,303 |
|
|
415,292 |
|
|
277,690 |
|
|
206,801 |
|
|
125,560 |
|
|
- |
|
|
78,960 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
181,404 |
|
|
67,249 |
|
|
33,044 |
|
|
67,216 |
|
|
9,831 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,064 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
25,192 |
|
|
34,590 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9,398) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
691 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,333) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
298 |
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
668 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
33,291 |
|
|
10,407 |
|
|
10,150 |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
- |
|
|
8,223 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,352,356 |
|
|
529,930 |
|
|
326,518 |
|
|
276,456 |
|
|
138,936 |
|
|
- |
|
|
80,516 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
548,609 |
|
|
223,190 |
|
|
111,490 |
|
|
106,199 |
|
|
73,665 |
|
|
- |
|
|
34,065 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
268,342 |
|
|
87,263 |
|
|
69,909 |
|
|
51,790 |
|
|
27,146 |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,234 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
128,697 |
|
|
13,693 |
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
18,144 |
|
|
17,894 |
|
|
- |
|
|
64,497 |
||
Total expenses |
|
|
945,648 |
|
|
324,146 |
|
|
195,868 |
|
|
176,133 |
|
|
118,705 |
|
|
- |
|
|
130,796 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
406,708 |
|
|
205,784 |
|
|
130,650 |
|
|
100,323 |
|
|
20,231 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(50,280) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
24,747 |
|
|
385 |
|
|
- |
|
|
411 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
23,951 |
||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
- |
||
(Loss) income from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
(30,340) |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(38,568) |
|
Interest and other investment (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
(84,094) |
|
|
522 |
|
|
319 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(85,059) |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(316,823) |
|
|
(66,474) |
|
|
(61,954) |
|
|
(44,778) |
|
|
(25,800) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(117,817) |
||
Net gain on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
23,589 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
769 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
22,820 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
120,607 |
|
|
142,671 |
|
|
72,643 |
|
|
58,764 |
|
|
(5,338) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(244,953) |
||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(10,506) |
|
|
(260) |
|
|
(1,188) |
|
|
(277) |
|
|
(908) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,873) |
||
Income (loss) from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
operations |
|
|
110,101 |
|
|
142,411 |
|
|
71,455 |
|
|
58,487 |
|
|
(6,246) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(252,826) |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,012 |
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
116,056 |
|
|
142,411 |
|
|
75,467 |
|
|
60,430 |
|
|
(6,246) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(252,826) |
||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
(13,581) |
|
|
(3,621) |
|
|
- |
|
|
615 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(10,575) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
102,475 |
|
|
138,790 |
|
|
75,467 |
|
|
61,045 |
|
|
(6,246) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(263,401) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
399,689 |
|
|
63,113 |
|
|
63,838 |
|
|
47,518 |
|
|
26,248 |
|
|
50,761 |
|
|
148,211 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
361,118 |
|
|
84,730 |
|
|
73,147 |
|
|
53,695 |
|
|
27,431 |
|
|
67,011 |
|
|
55,104 |
||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
54,283 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
277 |
|
|
973 |
|
|
43,457 |
|
|
8,121 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
917,565 |
|
$ |
286,893 |
|
$ |
213,647 |
|
$ |
162,535 |
|
$ |
48,406 |
|
$ |
258,049 |
|
$ |
(51,965) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on the following page.
31
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
20. Segment Information - continued
Notes to preceding tabular information:
(1) EBITDA represents “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization.” We consider EBITDA a supplemental measure for making decisions and assessing the unlevered performance of our segments as it relates to the total return on assets as opposed to the levered return on equity. As properties are bought and sold based on a multiple of EBITDA, we utilize this measure to make investment decisions as well as to compare the performance of our assets to that of our peers. EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income. EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
(2) Interest and debt expense, depreciation and amortization and income tax expense in the reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA includes our share of these items from partially owned entities.
(3) The tables below provide information about EBITDA from certain investments that are included in the “other” column of the preceding EBITDA by segment reconciliations. The totals for each of the columns below agree to the total EBITDA for the “other” column in the preceding EBITDA by segment reconciliations.
32
Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Vornado Realty Trust
New York, New York
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Vornado Realty Trust (the "Company") as of June 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and of changes in equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Vornado Realty Trust as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 23, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in method of accounting for debt with conversion options and noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
August 3, 2010
33
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Certain statements contained herein constitute forward‑looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as approximates, believes, expects, anticipates, estimates, intends, plans, would, may or other similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of these and our other forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control or predict. For further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or the date of any document incorporated by reference. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a discussion of our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition. There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2010.
34
Overview
Business Objective and Operating Strategy
Our business objective is to maximize shareholder value, which we measure by the total return provided to our shareholders. Below is a table comparing our performance to the Morgan Stanley REIT Index (RMS) and the SNL REIT Index (SNL) for the following periods ending June 30, 2010:
We intend to achieve our business objective by continuing to pursue our investment philosophy and executing our operating strategies through:
· Maintaining a superior team of operating and investment professionals and an entrepreneurial spirit;
·
Investing in properties in select markets, such as New York City and Washington, DC, where we believe there
is a high likelihood of capital appreciation;
· Acquiring quality properties at a discount to replacement cost and where there is a significant potential for higher rents;
· Investing in retail properties in select under-stored locations such as the New York City metropolitan area;
· Investing in fully-integrated operating companies that have a significant real estate component; and
· Developing and redeveloping our existing properties to increase returns and maximize value.
We expect to finance our growth, acquisitions and investments using internally generated funds, proceeds from possible asset sales and by accessing the public and private capital markets. We may also offer Vornado common or preferred shares or Operating Partnership units in exchange for property and may repurchase or otherwise reacquire our shares or any other securities in the future.
On July 8, 2010, we completed the first closing of Vornado Capital Partners, L.P., our real estate investment fund (the Fund) with initial equity commitments of $550,000,000, of which we committed $200,000,000. We expect to raise an additional $450,000,000 bringing total commitments to $1 billion. We serve as the general partner and investment manager of the Fund and it will be our exclusive investment vehicle during its three-year investment period for all investments that fit within the Funds investment parameters. The Funds investment parameters include debt, equity and other interests in real estate, and excludes (i) investments in vacant land and ground-up development; (ii) investments acquired by merger or primarily for our securities or properties; (iii) properties which can be combined with or relate to our existing properties; (iv) securities of commercial mortgage loan servicers and investments derived from any such investments; (v) non-controlling interests in equity and debt securities; and (vi) investments located outside of North America. The Fund has a term of eight years from the final closing date. In the six months ended June 30, 2010, we expensed $2,730,000 of Fund organization costs, which is included as a component of general and administrative expenses on our consolidated statement of income, and expect to incur additional expenses of approximately $3,700,000 in the third quarter of 2010.
We have a large concentration of properties in the New York City metropolitan area and in the Washington, DC and Northern Virginia areas. We compete with a large number of real estate property owners and developers, some of which may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. Principal factors of competition are rents charged, attractiveness of location, the quality of the property and breadth and quality of services provided. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the national, regional and local economies, financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation and population trends. See Risk Factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for additional information regarding these factors.
The economic recession and illiquidity and volatility in the financial and capital markets during 2008 and 2009 negatively affected substantially all businesses, including ours. Although signs of a recovery in 2010 have emerged, it is not possible for us to quantify the timing and impact of such a recovery, or lack thereof, on our future financial results.
35
Overview - continued
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 Financial Results Summary
Net income attributable to common shareholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $57,840,000, or $0.31 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $51,904,000, or $0.30 per diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 includes $500,000 for our share of net gains on sale of real estate. In addition, the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 include certain items that affect comparability which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of the net gains on sale of real estate and the items in the table below , net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, decreased net income attributable to common shareholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 by $12,596,000, or $0.07 per diluted share and increased net loss attributable to common shareholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 by $91,516,000, or $0.53 per diluted share.
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions (FFO) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $204,772,000, or $1.11 per diluted share, compared to $93,515,000, or $0.54 per diluted share, for the prior years quarter. FFO for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 include certain items that affect comparability which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of these items, net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, decreased FFO for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 by $12,596,000, or $0.07 per diluted share and decreased FFO for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 by $92,700,000 or $0.54 per diluted share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
||||
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||||||
Items that affect comparability (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Mezzanine loans receivable loss accrual |
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
$ |
122,738 |
|||
|
Default interest and fees accrued on three loans in special servicing |
|
|
|
6,558 |
|
|
- |
||
|
Net gain on redemption of perpetual perferred units |
|
|
(4,818) |
|
|
- |
|||
|
Real estate Fund organization costs |
|
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
- |
||
|
Costs of acquisitions not consummated |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
- |
|||
|
Net loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
(17,684) |
|||
|
Other, net |
|
|
(722) |
|
|
(4,209) |
|||
|
|
|
|
13,576 |
|
|
100,845 |
|||
Noncontrolling interests share of above adjustments |
|
|
(980) |
|
|
(8,145) |
||||
Items that affect comparability, net |
|
$ |
12,596 |
|
$ |
92,700 |
The percentage increase in GAAP basis and cash basis same store Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) of our operating segments for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 over the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and the trailing quarter ended March 31, 2010 are summarized below.
36
Overview continued
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Financial Results Summary
Net income attributable to common shares for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $258,125,000, or $1.41 per diluted share, compared to $73,937,000, or $0.45 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 include $307,000 and $673,000, respectively, for our share of net gains on sale of real estate. In addition, the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 include certain items that affect comparability which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of the net gains on sale of real estate and the items in the table below, net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, decreased net income attributable to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2010 by $10,552,000, or $0.06 per diluted share and decreased net income attributable to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2009 by $107,531,000, or $0.65 per diluted share.
FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $565,066,000, or $2.98 per diluted share, compared to $355,777,000, or $2.15 per diluted share, for the prior years six months. FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 includes certain items that affect comparability which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of these items, net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, decreased FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2010 by $10,861,000, or $0.06 per diluted share and decreased FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2009 by $108,194,000, or $0.66 per diluted share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
||||
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||||||
Items that affect comparability (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Litigation loss accrual and costs of acquisitions not consummated |
|
$ |
11,986 |
|
$ |
- |
|||
|
Net gain on redemption of perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(6,972) |
|
|
- |
|||
|
Mezzanine loans receivable loss accrual |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
122,738 |
|||
|
Default interest and fees accrued on three loans in special servicing |
|
|
6,558 |
|
|
- |
|||
|
Net gain resulting from Lexington's March 2010 stock issuance |
|
|
(5,998) |
|
|
- |
|||
|
Net gain on sale of condominiums |
|
|
(3,149) |
|
|
- |
|||
|
Real estate Fund organization costs |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
- |
|||
|
Net loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
(23,589) |
|||
|
Write-off of unamortized costs from the voluntary surrender of equity awards |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,588 |
|||
|
Alexander's stock appreciation rights |
|
|
- |
|
|
(11,105) |
|||
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1,447) |
|
|
(2,335) |
|||
|
|
|
|
11,680 |
|
|
118,297 |
|||
Noncontrolling interests share of above adjustments |
|
|
(819) |
|
|
(10,103) |
||||
Items that affect comparability, net |
|
$ |
10,861 |
|
$ |
108,194 |
The percentage increase (decrease) in GAAP basis and cash basis same store EBITDA of our operating segments for the six months ended June 30, 2010 over the six months ended June 30, 2009 is summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
Same Store EBITDA: |
|
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
||
|
June 30, 2010 vs. June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
GAAP basis |
|
1.7% |
|
6. 5 % |
|
7.8% |
|
(1.0%) |
|
|
|
Cash Basis |
|
2.7% |
|
10.8 % |
|
11.2% |
|
(1.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculations of same store EBITDA, reconciliations of our net income to EBITDA and FFO and the reasons we consider these non-GAAP financial measures useful are provided in the following pages of Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
37
Overview - continued
The following table sets forth certain information for the properties we own directly or indirectly, including leasing activity. The leasing activity presented below is based on leases signed during the period and is not intended to coincide with the commencement of rental revenue in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Tenant improvements and leasing commissions are presented below based on square feet leased during the period, on a per square foot and per square foot per annum basis, based on weighted average lease terms and as a percentage of initial rent per square foot.
38
39
Overview - continued
On July 29, 2010, as part of LNR Property Corporation’s (“LNR”) recapitalization, we acquired a 26.2% equity interest in LNR for a new investment of $116,000,000 in cash and conversion into equity of our mezzanine loan made to LNR’s parent, Riley HoldCo Corp. At June 30, 2010, the carrying amount of the loan was $15,000,000, after a $52,537,000 loss accrual recognized in 2009 and $6,900,000 in the current quarter. LNR is the industry leading servicer and special servicer of commercial mortgage loans and CMBS and a diversified real estate, investment, finance and management company. We will account for our investment in LNR on the equity method from the date of the recapitalization.
2010 Financing Activities:
On March 26, 2010, we completed a public offering of $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured notes due April 1, 2015. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1, commencing on October 1, 2010. The notes were sold at 99.834% of their face amount to yield 4.287%. The notes can be redeemed without penalty beginning January 1, 2015. We retained net proceeds of approximately $496,000,000.
On June 1, 2010, we refinanced a cross-collateralized loan of approximately $85,000,000, secured by 1101 17 th , 1140 Connecticut, 1730 M and 1150 17 th Streets, in Washington, DC. The new loan, which is guaranteed by the Operating Partnership, has a rate of LIBOR plus 1.40% (1.94% at June 30, 2010) and matures in June 2011, with three one-year extension options.
In the second quarter of 2010, we purchased $45,251,000 aggregate face amount ($44,170,000 aggregate carrying amount) of our convertible senior debentures for $45,242,000 in cash, resulting in net loss of $1,072,000.
In June 2010, we extended the maturity date of a $50,000,000 construction loan to February 2011, with a one-year extension option. In addition, in July 2010, we extended the maturity date of a $36,000,000 loan which had matured in October 2009, to September 2010, and are in negotiations to further extend this loan.
Recently Issued Accounting Literature
On January 21, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , adding new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements and additional disclosures about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements. The application of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810, Consolidation , which modifies the existing quantitative guidance used in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) by requiring entities to qualitatively assess whether an enterprise is a primary beneficiary, based on whether the entity has (i) power over the significant activities of the VIE, and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
40
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Below is a summary of net income and a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA (1) by segment for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
541,839 |
|
$ |
195,248 |
|
$ |
146,059 |
|
$ |
97,000 |
|
$ |
60,932 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
42,600 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
12,824 |
|
|
6,387 |
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
847 |
|
|
- |
|
|
292 |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
868 |
|
|
(687) |
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
(59) |
|
|
- |
|
|
555 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
16,302 |
|
|
9,134 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,581 |
Total rentals |
|
|
575,776 |
|
|
211,637 |
|
|
147,613 |
|
|
109,763 |
|
|
61,735 |
|
|
- |
|
|
45,028 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
88,080 |
|
|
32,431 |
|
|
13,376 |
|
|
36,073 |
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,263 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
13,468 |
|
|
20,639 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,171) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
321 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(737) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
428 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
12,560 |
|
|
4,513 |
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
784 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,145 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
696,105 |
|
|
272,910 |
|
|
168,510 |
|
|
147,648 |
|
|
66,509 |
|
|
- |
|
|
40,528 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
267,925 |
|
|
111,055 |
|
|
52,052 |
|
|
56,604 |
|
|
31,812 |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,402 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
135,265 |
|
|
44,271 |
|
|
36,533 |
|
|
27,714 |
|
|
12,674 |
|
|
- |
|
|
14,073 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
49,582 |
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
6,827 |
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
- |
|
|
24,607 |
||
Litigation loss accrual and acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
costs |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,930 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
454,702 |
|
|
160,093 |
|
|
94,785 |
|
|
91,145 |
|
|
51,667 |
|
|
- |
|
|
57,012 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
241,403 |
|
|
112,817 |
|
|
73,725 |
|
|
56,503 |
|
|
14,842 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(16,484) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
- |
|
|
198 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,673 |
||
Loss applicable to Toys |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
- |
||
(Loss) income from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
(2,614) |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
188 |
|
|
931 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,930) |
|
Interest and other investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,492 |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(149,887) |
|
|
(33,047) |
|
|
(34,304) |
|
|
(21,000) |
|
|
(16,255) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(45,281) |
||
Net loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
Net gain on disposition of wholly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
owned and partially owned assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than depreciable real estate |
|
|
4,382 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(31) |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,413 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
82,150 |
|
|
81,270 |
|
|
39,632 |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
(1,377) |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
(53,189) |
||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(4,939) |
|
|
(335) |
|
|
620 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(402) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,822) |
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
77,211 |
|
|
80,935 |
|
|
40,252 |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
(1,779) |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
(58,011) |
||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
(5,105) |
|
|
(2,556) |
|
|
- |
|
|
256 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,805) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
72,106 |
|
|
78,379 |
|
|
40,252 |
|
|
37,074 |
|
|
(1,779) |
|
|
(21,004) |
|
|
(60,816) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
207,512 |
|
|
31,595 |
|
|
34,943 |
|
|
22,526 |
|
|
16,478 |
|
|
42,093 |
|
|
59,877 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
184,103 |
|
|
42,736 |
|
|
39,694 |
|
|
28,500 |
|
|
12,785 |
|
|
34,444 |
|
|
25,944 |
||
Income tax (benefit) expense (2) |
|
|
(19,140) |
|
|
335 |
|
|
(617) |
|
|
- |
|
|
402 |
|
|
(24,123) |
|
|
4,863 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
444,581 |
|
$ |
153,045 |
|
$ |
114,272 |
|
$ |
88,100 |
|
$ |
27,886 |
|
$ |
31,410 |
|
$ |
29,868 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on page 43.
41
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
512,696 |
|
$ |
190,226 |
|
$ |
133,424 |
|
$ |
89,083 |
|
$ |
60,954 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
39,009 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
13,297 |
|
|
7,474 |
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
652 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(146) |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
767 |
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
4,109 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
- |
|
|
171 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
19,560 |
|
|
9,885 |
|
|
946 |
|
|
8,267 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
- |
|
|
450 |
Total rentals |
|
|
554,516 |
|
|
208,352 |
|
|
141,171 |
|
|
103,620 |
|
|
61,889 |
|
|
- |
|
|
39,484 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
83,375 |
|
|
32,092 |
|
|
14,514 |
|
|
30,148 |
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,109 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
12,420 |
|
|
17,818 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(5,398) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
999 |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
413 |
|
|
(43) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(339) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
256 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
19,338 |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,554 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
673,790 |
|
|
264,875 |
|
|
163,084 |
|
|
135,470 |
|
|
67,951 |
|
|
- |
|
|
42,410 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
269,711 |
|
|
109,646 |
|
|
54,514 |
|
|
53,419 |
|
|
34,470 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,662 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
136,686 |
|
|
43,153 |
|
|
34,186 |
|
|
28,784 |
|
|
13,767 |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,796 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
49,632 |
|
|
4,531 |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,218 |
||
Total expenses |
|
|
456,029 |
|
|
157,330 |
|
|
94,260 |
|
|
88,596 |
|
|
55,167 |
|
|
- |
|
|
60,676 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
217,761 |
|
|
107,545 |
|
|
68,824 |
|
|
46,874 |
|
|
12,784 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(18,266) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
6,614 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
- |
|
|
262 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,159 |
||
Loss applicable to Toys |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
- |
||
(Loss) income from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
(22,797) |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
794 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(26,922) |
|
Interest and other investment (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
(98,153) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
179 |
|
|
(198) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(98,415) |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(159,063) |
|
|
(33,356) |
|
|
(31,109) |
|
|
(22,609) |
|
|
(12,964) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(59,025) |
||
Net gain on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
17,684 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,684 |
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(38,281) |
|
|
75,874 |
|
|
39,938 |
|
|
25,123 |
|
|
(104) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(178,785) |
||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,457) |
|
|
(260) |
|
|
(755) |
|
|
(111) |
|
|
(665) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,666) |
||
(Loss) income from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
operations |
|
|
(43,738) |
|
|
75,614 |
|
|
39,183 |
|
|
25,012 |
|
|
(769) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(182,451) |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
3,363 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
||
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(40,375) |
|
|
75,614 |
|
|
41,367 |
|
|
26,191 |
|
|
(769) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(182,451) |
||
Net loss (income) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
(1,744) |
|
|
- |
|
|
497 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,987 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
(37,635) |
|
|
73,870 |
|
|
41,367 |
|
|
26,688 |
|
|
(769) |
|
|
(327) |
|
|
(178,464) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
197,512 |
|
|
31,675 |
|
|
32,237 |
|
|
24,459 |
|
|
13,190 |
|
|
15,578 |
|
|
80,373 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
181,528 |
|
|
41,969 |
|
|
35,904 |
|
|
29,625 |
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
31,754 |
|
|
28,393 |
||
Income tax (benefit) expense (2) |
|
|
(3,784) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
761 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
(9,634) |
|
|
4,053 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
337,621 |
|
$ |
147,774 |
|
$ |
110,269 |
|
$ |
80,883 |
|
$ |
26,969 |
|
$ |
37,371 |
|
$ |
(65,645) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on the following page.
42
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 - continued
Notes to preceding tabular information:
(1) EBITDA represents “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization.” We consider EBITDA a supplemental measure for making decisions and assessing the unlevered performance of our segments as it relates to the total return on assets as opposed to the levered return on equity. As properties are bought and sold based on a multiple of EBITDA, we utilize this measure to make investment decisions as well as to compare the performance of our assets to that of our peers. EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income. EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
(2) Interest and debt expense, depreciation and amortization and income tax expense in the reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA includes our share of these items from partially owned entities.
(3) The tables below provide information about EBITDA from certain investments that are included in the “other” column of the preceding EBITDA by segment reconciliations. The totals for each of the columns below agree to the total EBITDA for the “other” column in the preceding EBITDA by segment reconciliations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Alexander's |
$ |
14,260 |
|
$ |
14,061 |
|
|
|||||
|
Lexington |
|
11,435 |
|
|
6,603 |
(2) |
|
|||||
|
555 California Street |
|
11,136 |
|
|
10,157 |
|
|
|||||
|
Hotel Pennsylvania |
|
6,616 |
|
|
3,617 |
|
|
|||||
|
Industrial warehouses |
|
768 |
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|||||
|
Other investments |
|
8,423 |
|
|
(9,114) |
(3) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,638 |
|
|
26,693 |
|
|
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
(20,642) |
|
|
(16,564) |
|
|
|||||
|
Investment income and other, net (1) |
|
13,235 |
|
|
25,293 |
|
|
|||||
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests, including unit distributions |
|
(2,805) |
|
|
3,987 |
|
|
|||||
|
Mezzanine loans receivable loss accrual |
|
(6,900) |
|
|
(122,738) |
|
|
|||||
|
Real estate Fund organization costs |
|
(2,656) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|||||
|
Costs of acquisitions not consummated |
|
(1,930) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|||||
|
Net (loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
(1,072) |
|
|
17,684 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,868 |
|
$ |
(65,645) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in these captions (for this table only) exclude the mark-to-market of our deferred compensation plan assets and offsetting |
||||||||||
|
|
|
liability. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes $4,580 for our share of impairment losses recorded by Lexington. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes $7,650 of expense for our share of the Downtown Crossing, Boston lease termination payment. |
43
Results of Operations – Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009
Our revenues, which consist of property rentals, tenant expense reimbursements, hotel revenues, trade shows revenues, amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of above-market leases and fee income, were $696,105,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, compared to $673,790,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $22,315,000. Below are the details of the increase (decrease) by segment:
44
Results of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Expenses
Our expenses, which consist primarily of operating, depreciation and amortization and general and administrative expenses, were $454,702,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, compared to $456,029,000 in the prior years quarter, a decrease of $1,327,000. Below are the details of the (decrease) increase by segment:
45
Results of Operations – Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Income Applicable to Alexander’s
Our 32.4% share of Alexander’s net income (comprised of our share of Alexander’s net income, management, leasing, and development fees) was $7,066,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $6,614,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $452,000.
(Loss) Income Applicable to Toys
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a net loss of $21,004,000 from our investment in Toys, comprised of $23,191,000 for our 32.7% share of Toys’ net loss ($47,314,000 before our share of Toys’ income tax benefit) and $2,187,000 of interest and other income.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a net loss of $327,000 from our investment in Toys, comprised of (i) $16,220,000 for our 32.7% share of Toys’ net loss ($25,854,000 before our share of Toys’ income tax benefit), partially offset by (ii) $13,946,000 for our share of income from previously recognized deferred financing cost amortization expense, which we initially recorded as a reduction of the basis of our investment in Toys, and (iii) $1,947,000 of interest and other income.
(Loss) Income from Partially Owned Entities
Summarized below are the components of loss from partially owned entities for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
46
Results of Operations – Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Interest and Other Investment Income (Loss), net
Interest and other investment income (loss), net (comprised of interest income on mezzanine loans receivable, other interest income and dividend income) was income of $3,876,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to a loss of $98,153,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase in income of $102,029,000. This increase resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Mezzanine loans receivable loss accrual ($6,900 in this quarter compared to $122,738 in the prior |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
year's quarter) |
|
$ |
115,838 |
|
|
|
|
Lower average mezzanine loan investments ($137,260 in this quarter compared to $459,682 in the |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
prior year's quarter) |
|
|
(7,455) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in the value of investments in our deferred compensation plan (offset by a corresponding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
decrease in the liability for plan assets in general and administrative expenses) |
|
|
(7,196) |
|
|
|
|
Lower average yields on investments (0.1% in this quarter compared to 0.4% in the prior year's |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
quarter) |
|
|
(1,552) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in dividends and interest on marketable securities |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
||
|
Other, net |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
102,029 |
|
|
Interest and Debt Expense
Interest and debt expense was $149,887,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $159,063,000 in the prior year’s quarter, a decrease of $9,176,000. This decrease was primarily due to savings of (i) $24,727,000 from the acquisition and retirement of an aggregate of $2.1 billion of our convertible senior debentures and senior unsecured notes in 2009 and (ii) $7,903,000 from the repayment of $400,000,000 of cross-collateralized debt secured by our portfolio of 42 strip shopping centers, partially offset by (iii) $14,411,000 of interest from the issuance of $460,000,000 of senior unsecured notes in September 2009 and $500,000,000 of senior unsecured notes in March 2010, (iv) $6,558,000 of default interest and fees accrued on three loans that are currently in special servicing and (v) $2,527,000 from new financings and refinancings.
Net (Loss) Gain on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a $1,072,000 net loss on the early extinguishment of debt, compared to a $17,684,000 net gain in the prior year’s quarter. The current year’s loss resulted from the purchase of $45,251,000 aggregate face amount ($44,170,000 aggregate carrying amount) of our convertible senior debentures for $45,242,000 in cash. The prior year’s gain resulted primarily from the acquisition and retirement of our convertible senior debentures.
Net Gains on Disposition of Wholly Owned and Partially Owned Assets Other Than Depreciable Real Estate
Net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets other than depreciable real estate was $4,382,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and was primarily comprised of net gains on sale of marketable securities.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $4,939,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $5,457,000 in the prior year’s quarter, a decrease of $518,000.
47
Results of Operations – Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Discontinued Operations
The table below sets forth the combined results of operations of assets related to discontinued operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and include the operating results of 1999 K Street, which was sold on September 1, 2009 and 15 other retail properties, which were sold during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5,042 |
|
||
|
Total expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,679 |
|
||
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,363 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests, Including Unit Distributions
In the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded $5,105,000 of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, compared to a net loss of $2,740,000 in the prior year’s quarter. Net income and net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, is comprised of (i) allocations of income and loss to redeemable noncontrolling interests of $4,451,000 and $4,358,000, respectively, (ii) net income and net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries of $981,000 and $3,200,000, respectively, (iii) preferred unit distributions of the Operating Partnership of $4,491,000 and $4,818,000, respectively and (iv) a net gain of $4,818,000 on the redemption of the remaining portion of the Series D-12 perpetual preferred units in the current period. The increase of $8,809,000 in allocations of income to redeemable noncontrolling interests resulted primarily from higher net income subject to allocation to unitholders.
Preferred Share Dividends
Preferred share dividends were $14,266,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $14,269,000 for the prior year’s quarter.
48
Results of Operations – Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Same Store EBITDA
Same store EBITDA represents EBITDA from property level operations which are owned by us in both the current and prior year reporting periods. Same store EBITDA excludes segment-level overhead expenses, which are expenses that we do not consider to be property-level expenses, as well as other non-operating items. We present same store EBITDA on both a GAAP basis and a cash basis, which excludes income from the straight-lining of rents, amortization of below-market leases, net of above-market leases and other non-cash adjustments. We present these non-GAAP measures to (i) facilitate meaningful comparisons of the operational performance of our properties and segments, (ii) make decisions on whether to buy, sell or refinance properties, and (iii) compare the performance of our properties and segments to those of our peers. Same store EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
Below are the same store EBITDA results on a GAAP and cash basis for each of our segments for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|||
(Amounts in thousands) |
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
||||||
EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2010 |
$ |
153,045 |
|
$ |
114,272 |
|
$ |
88,100 |
|
$ |
27,886 |
||
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses included above |
|
4,767 |
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
6,827 |
|
|
7,181 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other non-operating income or expenses |
|
(2,314) |
|
|
(1,874) |
|
|
(3,616) |
|
|
(879) |
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2010 |
|
155,498 |
|
|
118,598 |
|
|
91,311 |
|
|
34,188 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization of below-market leases, net and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-cash adjustments |
|
(14,622) |
|
|
(586) |
|
|
(10,623) |
|
|
(803) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2010 |
$ |
140,876 |
|
$ |
118,012 |
|
$ |
80,688 |
|
$ |
33,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
147,774 |
|
$ |
110,269 |
|
$ |
80,883 |
|
$ |
26,969 |
||
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses included above |
|
4,531 |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
6,930 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other non-operating income or expenses |
|
(119) |
|
|
(4,862) |
|
|
(5,946) |
|
|
(582) |
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2009 |
|
152,186 |
|
|
110,967 |
|
|
81,330 |
|
|
33,317 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization of below-market leases, net and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-cash adjustments |
|
(16,080) |
|
|
(6,754) |
|
|
(9,747) |
|
|
(935) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
136,106 |
|
$ |
104,213 |
|
$ |
71,583 |
|
$ |
32,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in GAAP basis same store EBITDA for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
the three months ended June 30, 2010 over the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
three months ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
3,312 |
|
$ |
7,631 |
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Cash basis same store EBITDA for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
the three months ended June 30, 2010 over the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
three months ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
4,770 |
|
$ |
13,799 |
|
$ |
9,105 |
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase in GAAP basis same store EBITDA |
|
2.2% |
|
|
6.9% |
|
|
12.3% |
|
|
2.6% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase in Cash basis same store EBITDA |
|
3.5% |
|
|
13.2% |
|
|
12.7% |
|
|
3.1% |
49
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Below is a summary of net income and a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA (1) by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
1,065,960 |
|
$ |
387,852 |
|
$ |
285,939 |
|
$ |
192,764 |
|
$ |
122,376 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
77,029 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
26,324 |
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
7,508 |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
- |
|
|
483 |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
12,233 |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
6,674 |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
- |
|
|
965 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
32,209 |
|
|
18,339 |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
9,498 |
|
|
(106) |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,131 |
Total rentals |
|
|
1,136,726 |
|
|
421,240 |
|
|
292,879 |
|
|
216,444 |
|
|
124,555 |
|
|
- |
|
|
81,608 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
181,001 |
|
|
65,683 |
|
|
29,126 |
|
|
73,716 |
|
|
8,024 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,452 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
27,120 |
|
|
41,057 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(13,937) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
10,480 |
|
|
545 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,388) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
528 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
25,793 |
|
|
8,923 |
|
|
10,922 |
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,361 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,392,436 |
|
|
542,778 |
|
|
343,935 |
|
|
296,344 |
|
|
137,283 |
|
|
- |
|
|
72,096 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
546,980 |
|
|
226,104 |
|
|
108,715 |
|
|
110,178 |
|
|
71,031 |
|
|
- |
|
|
30,952 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
271,089 |
|
|
87,978 |
|
|
73,216 |
|
|
55,695 |
|
|
26,029 |
|
|
- |
|
|
28,171 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
98,312 |
|
|
9,346 |
|
|
12,097 |
|
|
13,832 |
|
|
14,411 |
|
|
- |
|
|
48,626 |
||
Litigation loss accrual and acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
costs |
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
- |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,930 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
928,367 |
|
|
323,428 |
|
|
204,084 |
|
|
179,705 |
|
|
111,471 |
|
|
- |
|
|
109,679 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
464,069 |
|
|
219,350 |
|
|
139,851 |
|
|
116,639 |
|
|
25,812 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(37,583) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
13,526 |
|
|
388 |
|
|
- |
|
|
409 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,729 |
||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
- |
||
Income (loss) from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
(4) |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
231 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,320) |
|
Interest and other investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
18,584 |
|
|
327 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,991 |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(289,622) |
|
|
(65,733) |
|
|
(68,788) |
|
|
(38,899) |
|
|
(29,042) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(87,160) |
||
Net loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,072) |
|
Net gain on disposition of wholly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
owned and partially owned assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than depreciable real estate |
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
765 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,922 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
320,308 |
|
|
156,584 |
|
|
71,109 |
|
|
80,451 |
|
|
(2,209) |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
(90,493) |
||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(10,553) |
|
|
(809) |
|
|
(100) |
|
|
(35) |
|
|
(596) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9,013) |
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
309,755 |
|
|
155,775 |
|
|
71,009 |
|
|
80,416 |
|
|
(2,805) |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
(99,506) |
||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
(23,097) |
|
|
(4,848) |
|
|
- |
|
|
498 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(18,747) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
286,658 |
|
|
150,927 |
|
|
71,009 |
|
|
80,914 |
|
|
(2,805) |
|
|
104,866 |
|
|
(118,253) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
403,699 |
|
|
62,587 |
|
|
70,114 |
|
|
41,880 |
|
|
29,487 |
|
|
83,233 |
|
|
116,398 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
370,252 |
|
|
84,810 |
|
|
79,535 |
|
|
57,311 |
|
|
26,267 |
|
|
69,771 |
|
|
52,558 |
||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
36,566 |
|
|
809 |
|
|
107 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
655 |
|
|
25,587 |
|
|
9,373 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
1,097,175 |
|
$ |
299,133 |
|
$ |
220,765 |
|
$ |
180,140 |
|
$ |
53,604 |
|
$ |
283,457 |
|
$ |
60,076 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on page 52.
50
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
|||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
1,019,779 |
|
$ |
378,988 |
|
$ |
262,798 |
|
$ |
177,233 |
|
$ |
123,955 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
76,805 |
||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
26,793 |
|
|
14,189 |
|
|
5,775 |
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(57) |
|
|
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
20,189 |
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
7,069 |
|
|
10,417 |
|
|
293 |
|
|
- |
|
|
103 |
|
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
market leases, net |
|
|
37,542 |
|
|
19,808 |
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
13,536 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,109 |
Total rentals |
|
|
1,104,303 |
|
|
415,292 |
|
|
277,690 |
|
|
206,801 |
|
|
125,560 |
|
|
- |
|
|
78,960 |
||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
181,404 |
|
|
67,249 |
|
|
33,044 |
|
|
67,216 |
|
|
9,831 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,064 |
||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
25,192 |
|
|
34,590 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9,398) |
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
691 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,333) |
|
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
298 |
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
668 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
33,291 |
|
|
10,407 |
|
|
10,150 |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
- |
|
|
8,223 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,352,356 |
|
|
529,930 |
|
|
326,518 |
|
|
276,456 |
|
|
138,936 |
|
|
- |
|
|
80,516 |
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
548,609 |
|
|
223,190 |
|
|
111,490 |
|
|
106,199 |
|
|
73,665 |
|
|
- |
|
|
34,065 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
268,342 |
|
|
87,263 |
|
|
69,909 |
|
|
51,790 |
|
|
27,146 |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,234 |
||
General and administrative |
|
|
128,697 |
|
|
13,693 |
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
18,144 |
|
|
17,894 |
|
|
- |
|
|
64,497 |
||
Total expenses |
|
|
945,648 |
|
|
324,146 |
|
|
195,868 |
|
|
176,133 |
|
|
118,705 |
|
|
- |
|
|
130,796 |
||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
406,708 |
|
|
205,784 |
|
|
130,650 |
|
|
100,323 |
|
|
20,231 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(50,280) |
||
Income applicable to Alexander's |
|
|
24,747 |
|
|
385 |
|
|
- |
|
|
411 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
23,951 |
||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
- |
||
(Loss) income from partially owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
entities |
|
|
(30,340) |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(38,568) |
|
Interest and other investment (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
income, net |
|
|
(84,094) |
|
|
522 |
|
|
319 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(85,059) |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(316,823) |
|
|
(66,474) |
|
|
(61,954) |
|
|
(44,778) |
|
|
(25,800) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(117,817) |
||
Net gain on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
debt |
|
|
23,589 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
769 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
22,820 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
120,607 |
|
|
142,671 |
|
|
72,643 |
|
|
58,764 |
|
|
(5,338) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(244,953) |
||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(10,506) |
|
|
(260) |
|
|
(1,188) |
|
|
(277) |
|
|
(908) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,873) |
||
Income (loss) from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
operations |
|
|
110,101 |
|
|
142,411 |
|
|
71,455 |
|
|
58,487 |
|
|
(6,246) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(252,826) |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,012 |
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
116,056 |
|
|
142,411 |
|
|
75,467 |
|
|
60,430 |
|
|
(6,246) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(252,826) |
||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
noncontrolling interests, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unit distributions |
|
|
(13,581) |
|
|
(3,621) |
|
|
- |
|
|
615 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(10,575) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vornado |
|
|
102,475 |
|
|
138,790 |
|
|
75,467 |
|
|
61,045 |
|
|
(6,246) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
(263,401) |
|
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
399,689 |
|
|
63,113 |
|
|
63,838 |
|
|
47,518 |
|
|
26,248 |
|
|
50,761 |
|
|
148,211 |
||
Depreciation and amortization (2) |
|
|
361,118 |
|
|
84,730 |
|
|
73,147 |
|
|
53,695 |
|
|
27,431 |
|
|
67,011 |
|
|
55,104 |
||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
54,283 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
277 |
|
|
973 |
|
|
43,457 |
|
|
8,121 |
||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
917,565 |
|
$ |
286,893 |
|
$ |
213,647 |
|
$ |
162,535 |
|
$ |
48,406 |
|
$ |
258,049 |
|
$ |
(51,965) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes on the following page.
51
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 - continued
Notes to preceding tabular information:
(1) EBITDA represents Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. We consider EBITDA a supplemental measure for making decisions and assessing the unlevered performance of our segments as it relates to the total return on assets as opposed to the levered return on equity. As properties are bought and sold based on a multiple of EBITDA, we utilize this measure to make investment decisions as well as to compare the performance of our assets to that of our peers. EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income. EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
(2) Interest and debt expense, depreciation and amortization and income tax (benefit) expense in the reconciliation of our net income (loss) to EBITDA includes our share of these items from partially owned entities.
(3) The tables below provide information about EBITDA from certain investments that are included in the other column of the preceding EBITDA by segment reconciliations. The totals for each of the columns below agree to the total EBITDA for the other column in the preceding EBITDA by segment reconciliations
52
Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009
Revenues
Our revenues, which consist of property rentals, tenant expense reimbursements, hotel revenues, trade shows revenues, amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of above-market leases and fee income, were $1,392,436,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1,352,356,000 in the prior years six months, an increase of $40,080,000. Below are the details of the increase (decrease) by segment:
53
Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Expenses
Our expenses, which consist primarily of operating, depreciation and amortization and general and administrative expenses, were $928,367,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $945,648,000 in the prior years six months, a decrease of $17,281,000. Below are the details of the (decrease) increase by segment:
54
Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Income Applicable to Alexanders
Our 32.4% share of Alexanders net income (comprised of our share of Alexanders net income, management, leasing, and development fees) was $13,526,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $24,747,000 for the prior years six months, a decrease of $11,221,000. This decrease was primarily due to $11,105,000 of income for our share of the reversal of accrued stock appreciation rights compensation expense in the prior year.
Income Applicable to Toys
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized $104,866,000 of income from our investment in Toys, comprised of $100,649,000 for our 32.7% share of Toys net income ($126,236,000 before our share of Toys income tax expense) and $4,217,000 of interest and other income.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized $96,820,000 of income from our investment in Toys, comprised of (i) $79,074,000 for our 32.7% share of Toys net income ($122,531,000 before our share of Toys income tax expense), (ii) $13,946,000 for our share of income from previously recognized deferred financing cost amortization expense, which we initially recorded as a reduction of the basis of our investment in Toys, and (iii) $3,800,000 of interest and other income.
Income (Loss) from Partially Owned Entities
Summarized below are the components of loss from partially owned entities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
||||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|||||||
|
Equity in Net Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Lexington - 13.8% share in 2010 and 16.1% share in 2009 of equity in |
|
$ |
5,617 |
(1) |
|
$ |
(9,915) |
(2) |
|
|||
|
|
net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
India real estate ventures - 4% to 36.5% range in our share of equity in net income (loss) |
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
(921) |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Other, net (3) |
|
|
(5,604) |
|
|
|
(19,504) |
(4) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
|
$ |
(30,340) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes a $5,998 net gain resulting from Lexington's March 2010 stock issuance. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
(2) |
Includes a $4,580 for our share of impairment losses recorded by Lexington. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Represents our equity in net income or loss of partially owned office buildings in New York and Washington, DC, the Monmouth Mall, Verde Realty Operating Partnership, 85 10th Avenue Associates and others. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
(4) |
Includes $7,650 of expense for our share of Downtown Crossing, Boston lease termination payment. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Results of Operations – Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Interest and Other Investment Income (Loss), net
Interest and other investment income (loss), net (comprised of interest income on mezzanine loans receivable, other interest income and dividend income) was income of $18,584,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to a loss of $84,094,000 in the prior year’s six months, an increase in income of $102,678,000. This increase resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Mezzanine loans receivable loss accrual ($6,900 in this year's six months compared to $122,738 in |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
the prior year's six months) |
|
$ |
115,838 |
|
|
|
|
Lower average mezzanine loan investments ($127,925 in this year's six months compared to $466,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
in the prior year's six months) |
|
|
(15,064) |
|
|
|
|
Lower average yields on investments (0.2% in this year's six months compared to 0.5% in the prior |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
year's six months) |
|
|
(3,659) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in dividends and interest on marketable securities |
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
||
|
Increase in the value of investments in our deferred compensation plan (offset by a corresponding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
increase in the liability for plan assets in general and administrative expenses) |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
102,678 |
|
|
Interest and Debt Expense
Interest and debt expense was $289,622,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $316,823,000 in the prior year’s six months, a decrease of $27,201,000. This decrease was primarily due to savings of (i) $51,507,000 from the acquisition and retirement of an aggregate of $2.1 billion of our convertible senior debentures and senior unsecured notes in 2009 and (ii) $16,449,000 from the repayment of $400,000,000 of cross-collateralized debt secured by our portfolio of 42 strip shopping centers, partially offset by (iii) $23,764,000 of interest from the issuance of $460,000,000 of senior unsecured notes in September 2009 and $500,000,000 of a senior unsecured notes in March 2010, (iv) $9,158,000 of lower capitalized interest and (v) $6,558,000 of default interest and fees accrued on three loans that are currently in special servicing.
Net (Loss) Gain on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a $1,072,000 net loss on the early extinguishment of debt, compared to a $23,589,000 net gain in the prior year’s six months. The current year’s loss resulted from the purchase of $45,251,000 aggregate face amount ($44,170,000 aggregate carrying amount) of our convertible senior debentures for $45,242,000 in cash. The prior year’s gain resulted primarily from the acquisition and retirement of our convertible senior debentures.
Net Gains on Disposition of Wholly Owned and Partially Owned Assets Other Than Depreciable Real Estate
Net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets other than depreciable real estate was $7,687,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and was primarily comprised of net gains on the sale of marketable securities and net gains on sale of condominiums at our 40 East 66 th Street property.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $10,553,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $10,506,000 in the prior year’s six months.
56
Results of Operations – Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Discontinued Operations
The table below sets forth the combined results of operations of assets related to discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and include the operating results of 1999 K Street, which was sold on September 1, 2009 and 15 other retail properties, which were sold during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
||||
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
||
|
Total expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,535 |
|
||
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5,955 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests, Including Unit Distributions
In the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $23,097,000 and $13,581,000, respectively, of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is comprised of (i) allocations of income to redeemable noncontrolling interests of $19,666,000 and $7,644,000, respectively, (ii) net income and net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries of $1,194,000 and $3,700,000, respectively, (iii) preferred unit distributions of the Operating Partnership of $9,209,000 and $9,637,000, respectively and (iv) a net gain of $6,972,000 on the redemption of all of the Series D-12 perpetual preferred units in the current year. The increase of $12,022,000 in allocations of income to redeemable noncontrolling interests resulted primarily from higher net income subject to allocation to unitholders.
Preferred Share Dividends
Preferred share dividends were $28,533,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $28,538,000 for the prior year’s six months.
57
Results of Operations – Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to June 30, 2009 - continued
Same Store EBITDA
Same store EBITDA represents EBITDA from property level operations which are owned by us in both the current and prior year reporting periods. Same store EBITDA excludes segment-level overhead expenses, which are expenses that we do not consider to be property-level expenses, as well as other non-operating items. We present same store EBITDA on both a GAAP basis and a cash basis, which excludes income from the straight-lining of rents, amortization of below-market leases, net of above-market leases and other non-cash adjustments. We present these non-GAAP measures to (i) facilitate meaningful comparisons of the operational performance of our properties and segments, (ii) make decisions on whether to buy, sell or refinance properties, and (iii) compare the performance of our properties and segments to those of our peers. Same store EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
Below are the same store EBITDA results on a GAAP and cash basis for each of our segments for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|||
(Amounts in thousands) |
Office |
|
Office |
|
Retail |
|
Mart |
||||||
EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2010 |
$ |
299,133 |
|
$ |
220,765 |
|
$ |
180,140 |
|
$ |
53,604 |
||
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses included above |
|
9,346 |
|
|
12,097 |
|
|
13,832 |
|
|
14,411 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other non-operating income or expenses |
|
(2,938) |
|
|
758 |
|
|
(10,753) |
|
|
(3,607) |
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2010 |
|
305,541 |
|
|
233,620 |
|
|
183,219 |
|
|
64,408 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization of below-market leases, net and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-cash adjustments |
|
(30,230) |
|
|
(5,048) |
|
|
(20,014) |
|
|
(2,179) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2010 |
$ |
275,311 |
|
$ |
228,572 |
|
$ |
163,205 |
|
$ |
62,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
286,893 |
|
$ |
213,647 |
|
$ |
162,535 |
|
$ |
48,406 |
||
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses included above |
|
13,693 |
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
18,144 |
|
|
17,894 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other non-operating income or expenses |
|
(129) |
|
|
(8,708) |
|
|
(10,783) |
|
|
(1,250) |
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2009 |
|
300,457 |
|
|
219,408 |
|
|
169,896 |
|
|
65,050 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization of below-market leases, net and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-cash adjustments |
|
(32,322) |
|
|
(13,042) |
|
|
(23,112) |
|
|
(1,605) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
268,135 |
|
$ |
206,366 |
|
$ |
146,784 |
|
$ |
63,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in GAAP basis same store EBITDA for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
the six months ended June 30, 2010 over the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
5,084 |
|
$ |
14,212 |
|
$ |
13,323 |
|
$ |
(642) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in Cash basis same store EBITDA for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
the six months ended June 30, 2010 over the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months ended June 30, 2009 |
$ |
7,176 |
|
$ |
22,206 |
|
$ |
16,421 |
|
$ |
(1,216) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase (decrease) in GAAP basis same store EBITDA |
|
1.7% |
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
7.8% |
|
|
(1.0%) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase (decrease) in Cash basis same store EBITDA |
|
2.7% |
|
|
10.8% |
|
|
11.2% |
|
|
(1.9%) |
58
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Our revenues and expenses are subject to seasonality during the year which impacts quarterly net earnings, cash flows and funds from operations, and therefore impacts comparisons of the current quarter to the previous quarter. The business of Toys is highly seasonal. Historically, Toys fourth quarter net income, which we record on a one-quarter lag basis in our first quarter, accounts for more than 80% of Toys fiscal year net income. The Office and Merchandise Mart segments have historically experienced higher utility costs in the first and third quarters of the year. The Merchandise Mart segment also has experienced higher earnings in the second and fourth quarters of the year due to major trade shows occurring in those quarters. The Retail segment revenue in the fourth quarter is typically higher due to the recognition of percentage rental income. Below are the same store EBITDA results on a GAAP and cash basis for each of our segments for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
59
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We anticipate that cash flow from continuing operations over the next twelve months will be adequate to fund our business operations, cash distributions to unitholders of the Operating Partnership, cash dividends to shareholders, debt amortization and recurring capital expenditures. Capital requirements for development expenditures and acquisitions (excluding Fund acquisitions as described below), may require funding from borrowings and/or equity offerings. We may from time to time purchase or retire outstanding debt securities. Such purchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements and other factors. The amounts involved in connection with these transactions could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
We have raised, and may continue to raise, capital for future real estate acquisitions through our real estate investment Fund. On July 8, 2010, we completed the first closing of the Fund with initial equity commitments of $550,000,000, of which we committed $200,000,000. We expect to raise an additional $450,000,000 bringing total commitments to $1 billion. We serve as the general partner and investment manager of the Fund and it will be our exclusive investment vehicle for all investments that fit within the Funds investment parameters during its three-year investment period.
Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Property rental income is our primary source of cash flow and is dependent upon the occupancy and rental rates of our properties. Other sources of liquidity to fund cash requirements include proceeds from debt financings, including mortgage loans, senior unsecured borrowings, and our revolving credit facilities; proceeds from the issuance of common and preferred equity; and asset sales. Our cash requirements include property operating expenses, capital improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, distributions to common and preferred shareholders, as well as acquisition and development costs. Our cash and cash equivalents were $652,121,000 at June 30, 2010, a $116,642,000 increase over the balance at December 31, 2009. This increase resulted from $532,365,000 of net cash provided by operating activities and $207,359,000 of net cash provided by investing activities, partially offset by, $623,082,000 of net cash used in financing activities.
Our consolidated outstanding debt was $10,670,218,000 at June 30, 2010, a $269,397,000 decrease over the balance at December 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily due to net repayments of $700,000,000 under our revolving credit facilities, partially offset by the public offering of $500,000,000 of 4.25% senior unsecured notes in March 2010. During the remainder of 2010 and 2011, $373,000,000 and $1,981,000,000 of our outstanding debt matures, respectively. We may refinance such debt or choose to repay all or a portion, using existing cash balances or our revolving credit facilities.
Our share of debt of unconsolidated subsidiaries was $2,844,923,000 at June 30, 2010, a $304,717,000 decrease from the balance at December 31, 2009.
Cash flows provided by operating activities of $532,365,000 was comprised of (i) net income of $309,755,000, (ii) $115,978,000 of non-cash adjustments, including depreciation and amortization expense, the effect of straight-lining of rental income, equity in net income of partially owned entities, (iii) distributions of income from partially owned entities of $18,517,000, and (iv) the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $88,115,000.
Net cash provided by investing activities of $207,359,000 was comprised of (i) restricted cash of $133,888,000, (ii) proceeds from sales of marketable securities of $122,956,000, (iii) proceeds received from repayment of mezzanine loans receivable of $105,061,000, (iv) proceeds from the sale of real estate and related investments of $49,544,000, (v) proceeds from maturing short-term investments of $40,000,000 and (vi) distributions of capital from partially owned entities of $12,638,000, partially offset by (vii) additions to real estate of $68,925,000, (viii) development and redevelopment expenditures of $68,499,000, (ix) investments in mezzanine loans receivable and other of $48,339,000, (x) investments in partially owned entities of $41,920,000, (xi) deposits in connection with real estate acquisitions of $15,128,000, and (xii) purchases of marketable equity securities of $13,917,000.
Net cash used in financing activities of $623,082,000 was comprised of (i) proceeds from borrowings of $901,040,000, offset by, (ii) repayments of borrowings, including the purchase of our senior unsecured notes, of $1,197,525,000, (iii) dividends paid on common shares of $236,279,000, (iv) dividends paid on preferred shares of $28,533,000, (v) distributions to noncontrolling interests of $27,665,000, (vi) repurchase of shares related to stock compensation arrangements and related tax withholdings of $15,396,000, (vii) purchases of outstanding preferred units of $13,000,000 and (viii) debt issuance costs of $5,724,000.
60
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures consist of expenditures to maintain assets, tenant improvement allowances and leasing commissions. Recurring capital improvements include expenditures to maintain a property’s competitive position within the market and tenant improvements and leasing commissions necessary to re-lease expiring leases or renew or extend existing leases. Non-recurring capital improvements include expenditures completed in the year of acquisition and the following two years that were planned at the time of acquisition as well as tenant improvements and leasing commissions for space that was vacant at the time of acquisition of a property. Our development and redevelopment expenditures include all hard and soft costs associated with the development or redevelopment of a property, including tenant improvements, leasing commissions, capitalized interest and operating costs until the property is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.
Below are the details of capital expenditures, leasing commissions and development and redevelopment expenditures and a reconciliation of total expenditures on an accrual basis to the cash expended in the six months ended June 30, 2010.
61
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Our cash and cash equivalents were $2,068,498,000 at June 30, 2009, a $541,645,000 increase over the balance at December 31, 2008. This increase resulted from $379,439,000 of net cash provided by operating activities and $381,516,000 of net cash provided by financing activities, partially offset by $219,310,000 of net cash used in investing activities.
Our consolidated outstanding debt was $11,652,801,000 at June 30, 2009, a $426,654,000 decrease from the balance at December 31, 2008. This decrease resulted primarily from the repurchase of a portion of our convertible senior debentures and senior unsecured notes during 2009. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $648,250,000 and $358,468,000, respectively, was outstanding under our revolving credit facilities.
Our share of debt of unconsolidated subsidiaries was $3,068,868,000 at June 30, 2009, a $127,717,000 decrease from the balance at December 31, 2008. This resulted primarily from a decrease in our share of Toys “R” Us outstanding debt.
Cash flows provided by operating activities of $379,439,000 was primarily comprised of (i) net income of $116,056,000, adjusted for $252,841,000 of non-cash adjustments, including depreciation and amortization expense, mezzanine loan loss accruals, the effect of straight-lining of rental income, equity in net income of partially owned entities and amortization of below market leases, net of above market leases, (ii) distributions of income from partially owned entities of $15,131,000, partially offset by (iii) the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $4,589,000.
Net cash used in investing activities of $219,310,000 was primarily comprised of (i) development and redevelopment expenditures of 267,124,000, (ii) investments in partially owned entities of $25,712,000, (iii) additions to real estate of $84,750,000, partially offset by, (iv) $60,786,000 of restricted cash and (v) $45,472,000 received from mezzanine loan receivables repayments.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $381,516,000 was primarily comprised of (i) $710,226,000 of proceeds from the issuance of common shares in April 2009, (ii) proceeds from borrowings of $520,137,000, partially offset by, (iii) repayments of borrowings of $644,011,000, (iv) dividends paid on common shares of $126,174,000, (v) distributions to noncontrolling interests of $20,931,000 and (vi) dividends paid on preferred shares of $28,540,000.
62
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Capital Expenditures
Below are the details of capital expenditures, leasing commissions and development and redevelopment expenditures and a reconciliation of total expenditures on an accrual basis to the cash expended in the six months ended June 30, 2009.
63
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and all risk property and rental value insurance with limits of $2.0 billion per occurrence, including coverage for terrorist acts, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods. Our California properties have earthquake insurance with coverage of $150,000,000 per occurrence, subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property, up to a $150,000,000 annual aggregate.
Penn Plaza Insurance Company, LLC (“PPIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a re-insurer with respect to a portion of our earthquake insurance coverage and as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) acts, as defined by TRIPRA. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to PPIC. Our coverage for NBCR losses is up to $2 billion per occurrence, for which PPIC is responsible for a deductible of $3,200,000 and 15% of the balance of a covered loss and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 85% of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss borne by PPIC.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years.
Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties which are non-recourse to us, senior unsecured notes, exchangeable senior debentures, convertible senior debentures and revolving credit agreements contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain it could adversely affect our ability to finance and/or refinance our properties and expand our portfolio.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us. However, in certain cases we have provided guarantees or master leased tenant space. These guarantees and master leases terminate either upon the satisfaction of specified circumstances or repayment of the underlying loans. As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate dollar amount of these guarantees and master leases is approximately $254,042,000.
At June 30, 2010, $21,947,000 of letters of credit were outstanding under one of our revolving credit facilities. Our credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum interest coverage and maximum debt to market capitalization ratios, and provide for higher interest rates in the event of a decline in our ratings below Baa3/BBB. Our credit facilities also contain customary conditions precedent to borrowing, including representations and warranties and also contain customary events of default that could give rise to accelerated repayment, including such items as failure to pay interest or principal.
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. The environmental assessments did not reveal any material environmental contamination. However, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant costs to us.
We are committed to fund additional capital to certain of our partially owned entities aggregating approximately $217,800,000, of which $200,000,000 is committed to our real estate Fund.
As part of the process of obtaining the required approvals to demolish and develop our 220 Central Park South property into a new residential tower, we have committed to fund the estimated project cost of approximately $400,000,000 to $425,000,000.
64
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Litigation
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters, including the matters referred to below, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On January 8, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (“USDC-NJ”) claiming that we had no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $5,000,000 of annual rent from Stop & Shop pursuant to the Master Agreement and Guaranty, because of the expiration of the East Brunswick, Jersey City, Middletown, Union and Woodbridge leases to which the $5,000,000 of additional rent was previously allocated. Stop & Shop asserted that a prior order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York dated February 6, 2001, as modified on appeal to the District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 13, 2001, froze our right to reallocate which effectively terminated our right to collect the additional rent from Stop & Shop. On March 3, 2003, after we moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Stop & Shop voluntarily withdrew its complaint. On March 26, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a new complaint in New York State Supreme Court, asserting substantially the same claims as in its USDC-NJ complaint. We removed the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In January 2005 that court remanded the action to the New York State Supreme Court. On February 14, 2005, we served an answer in which we asserted a counterclaim seeking a judgment for all the unpaid additional rent accruing through the date of the judgment and a declaration that Stop & Shop will continue to be liable for the additional rent as long as any of the leases subject to the Master Agreement and Guaranty remain in effect. On May 17, 2005, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On July 15, 2005, Stop & Shop opposed our motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued its decision denying the motions for summary judgment. Both parties appealed the Court’s decision and on December 14, 2006, the Appellate Court division issued a decision affirming the Court’s decision. On January 16, 2007, we filed a motion for the reconsideration of one aspect of the Appellate Court’s decision which was denied on March 13, 2007. Discovery is now complete. On October 19, 2009, Stop & Shop filed a motion for leave to amend its pleadings to assert new claims for relief, including a claim for damages in an unspecified amount, and an additional affirmative defense. On April 26, 2010, Stop and Shop’s motion was denied. We anticipate that a trial date will be set for some time in 2010. We intend to continue to vigorously pursue our claims against Stop & Shop. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 24, 2007, we acquired a 70% controlling interest in 1290 Avenue of the Americas and the 555 California Street complex. Our 70% interest was acquired through the purchase of all of the shares of a group of foreign companies that own, through U.S. entities, the 1% sole general partnership interest and a 69% limited partnership interest in the partnerships that own the two properties. The remaining 30% limited partnership interest is owned by Donald J. Trump. In August 2005, Mr. Trump brought a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against, among others, the general partners of the partnerships referred to above relating to a dispute over the sale of properties located on the former Penn Central rail yards between West 59th and 72nd Streets in Manhattan which were formerly owned by the partnerships. In decisions issued in 2006, 2007 and 2009, the New York State Supreme Court dismissed all of Mr. Trump’s claims, and those decisions were affirmed by the Appellate Division. Mr. Trump cannot further appeal those decisions. In April 2010, Mr. Trump notified us of his intent to file a new suit claiming, among other things, that the limited partnerships should be dissolved. On April 29, 2010, we filed a motion for declaratory judgment in New York courts seeking to dispose of this claim. In June 2010, our motion was granted and a final judgment was entered that disposed of Mr. Trump’s claims with prejudice.
In July 2005, we acquired H Street Building Corporation (“H Street”) which has a subsidiary that owns, among other things, a 50% tenancy in common interest in land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as "Pentagon Row," leased to two tenants, Street Retail, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. In April 2007, H Street acquired the remaining 50% interest in that fee. On September 25, 2008, both tenants filed suit against us and the former owners claiming the right of first offer to purchase the fee interest, damages in excess of $75,000,000 and punitive damages. In April 2010, the Trial Court entered judgment in favor of the tenants, that we sell the land to the tenants for a net sales price of $14,992,000, representing the Trial Court’s allocation of our purchase price for H Street. The request for damages and punitive damages was denied. We have filed a notice of appeal and the Trial Court’s judgment is stayed pending the appeal. As a result of the Trial Court’s decision, we recorded a $10,056,000 loss accrual in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily representing previously recognized rental income.
65
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (“FFO”)
FFO is computed in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income or loss adjusted to exclude net gains from sales of depreciated real estate assets, depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets, extraordinary items and other specified non-cash items, including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries. FFO and FFO per diluted share are used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization and net gains on sales, which are based on historical costs and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a performance measure or cash flow as a liquidity measure. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. The calculations of both the numerator and denominator used in the computation of income per share are disclosed in footnote 15 – Income Per Share, in the notes to our consolidated financial statements on page 24 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
FFO for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010, and 2009
FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $204,772,000, or $1.11 per diluted share, compared to $93,515,000, or $0.54 per diluted share for the prior year’s quarter. FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $565,066,000 or $2.98 per diluted share, compared to $355,777,000, or $2.15 per diluted share for the prior year’s six months. Details of certain items that affect comparability are discussed in the financial results summary of our “Overview.”
|
For The Three |
|
For The Six |
||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
Months Ended June 30, |
|
Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||
Reconciliation of our net income (loss) to FFO: |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Vornado |
$ |
72,106 |
|
$ |
(37,635) |
|
$ |
286,658 |
|
$ |
102,475 |
||
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
|
127,181 |
|
|
128,662 |
|
|
254,795 |
|
|
252,789 |
||
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Toys, to arrive at FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
|
17,663 |
|
|
15,566 |
|
|
35,164 |
|
|
32,146 |
|
|
Income tax effect of Toys' adjustments included above |
|
(6,182) |
|
|
(5,448) |
|
|
(12,307) |
|
|
(11,251) |
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
partially owned entities, excluding Toys, to arrive at FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
|
19,533 |
|
|
19,348 |
|
|
39,074 |
|
|
33,956 |
|
|
Net gains on sale of real estate |
|
- |
|
|
(500) |
|
|
(307) |
|
|
(673) |
Noncontrolling interests' share of above adjustments |
|
(11,303) |
|
|
(12,209) |
|
|
(22,474) |
|
|
(25,212) |
||
FFO |
|
218,998 |
|
|
107,784 |
|
|
580,603 |
|
|
384,230 |
||
Preferred share dividends |
|
(14,266) |
|
|
(14,269) |
|
|
(28,533) |
|
|
(28,538) |
||
FFO attributable to common shareholders |
|
204,732 |
|
|
93,515 |
|
|
552,070 |
|
|
355,692 |
||
Interest on 3.875% exchangeable senior debentures |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,915 |
|
|
- |
||
Convertible preferred dividends |
|
40 |
|
|
- |
|
|
81 |
|
|
85 |
||
FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions |
$ |
204,772 |
|
$ |
93,515 |
|
$ |
565,066 |
|
$ |
355,777 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reconciliation of Weighted Average Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
182,027 |
|
|
171,530 |
|
|
181,786 |
|
|
164,009 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.875% exchangeable senior debentures |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Employee stock options and restricted share awards |
|
1,617 |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
Convertible preferred shares |
|
71 |
|
|
- |
|
|
71 |
|
|
74 |
|
Denominator for FFO per diluted share |
|
183,715 |
|
|
172,901 |
|
|
189,334 |
|
|
165,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions per diluted share |
$ |
1.11 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
$ |
2.15 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates. Market interest rates are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. Our exposure to a change in interest rates on our consolidated and non-consolidated debt (all of which arises out of non-trading activity) is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
As at June 30, 2010 |
|
As at December 31, 2009 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Effect of 1% |
|
|
|
Weighted |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Change In |
|
|
|
Average |
||
Consolidated debt: |
Balance |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Base Rates |
|
Balance |
Interest Rate |
||||||
|
Variable rate |
$ |
2,044,846 |
|
2.00% |
|
$ |
20,448 |
|
$ |
2,657,972 |
|
1.67% |
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
8,625,372 |
|
5.99% |
|
|
- |
|
|
8,281,643 |
|
5.89% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,670,218 |
|
5.23% |
|
|
20,448 |
|
$ |
10,939,615 |
|
4.86% |
Pro-rata share of debt of non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
consolidated entities (non-recourse): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate – excluding Toys |
$ |
289,428 |
|
2.85% |
|
|
2,894 |
|
$ |
331,980 |
|
2.87% |
||
|
Variable rate – Toys |
|
425,439 |
|
4.65% |
|
|
4,254 |
|
|
852,040 |
|
3.45% |
|
|
Fixed rate (including $1,285,497, and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,077,919 of Toys debt in 2010 and 2009) |
|
2,130,056 |
|
7.36% |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,965,620 |
|
7.16% |
|
|
|
$ |
2,844,923 |
|
6.49% |
|
|
7,148 |
|
$ |
3,149,640 |
|
5.70% |
Redeemable noncontrolling interests’ share of above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,987) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total change in annual net income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Per share-diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
We may utilize various financial instruments to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings, including hedging strategies, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies. As of June 30, 2010, variable rate debt with an aggregate principal amount of $507,750,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 2.58% was subject to LIBOR caps. These caps are based on a notional amount of $507,750,000 and cap LIBOR at a weighted average rate of 5.39%.
Fair Value of Debt
The estimated fair value of our consolidated debt is calculated based on current market prices and discounted cash flows at the current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the remaining term of such debt. As of June 30, 2010, the estimated fair value of our consolidated debt was $10,569,552,000.
67
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a‑15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
68
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters, including the matters referred to below, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On January 8, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (“USDC-NJ”) claiming that we had no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $5,000,000 of annual rent from Stop & Shop pursuant to the Master Agreement and Guaranty, because of the expiration of the East Brunswick, Jersey City, Middletown, Union and Woodbridge leases to which the $5,000,000 of additional rent was previously allocated. Stop & Shop asserted that a prior order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York dated February 6, 2001, as modified on appeal to the District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 13, 2001, froze our right to reallocate which effectively terminated our right to collect the additional rent from Stop & Shop. On March 3, 2003, after we moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Stop & Shop voluntarily withdrew its complaint. On March 26, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a new complaint in New York State Supreme Court, asserting substantially the same claims as in its USDC-NJ complaint. We removed the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In January 2005 that court remanded the action to the New York State Supreme Court. On February 14, 2005, we served an answer in which we asserted a counterclaim seeking a judgment for all the unpaid additional rent accruing through the date of the judgment and a declaration that Stop & Shop will continue to be liable for the additional rent as long as any of the leases subject to the Master Agreement and Guaranty remain in effect. On May 17, 2005, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On July 15, 2005, Stop & Shop opposed our motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued its decision denying the motions for summary judgment. Both parties appealed the Court’s decision and on December 14, 2006, the Appellate Court division issued a decision affirming the Court’s decision. On January 16, 2007, we filed a motion for the reconsideration of one aspect of the Appellate Court’s decision which was denied on March 13, 2007. Discovery is now complete. On October 19, 2009, Stop & Shop filed a motion for leave to amend its pleadings to assert new claims for relief, including a claim for damages in an unspecified amount, and an additional affirmative defense. On April 26, 2010, Stop and Shop’s motion was denied. We anticipate that a trial date will be set for some time in 2010. We intend to continue to vigorously pursue our claims against Stop & Shop. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 24, 2007, we acquired a 70% controlling interest in 1290 Avenue of the Americas and the 555 California Street complex. Our 70% interest was acquired through the purchase of all of the shares of a group of foreign companies that own, through U.S. entities, the 1% sole general partnership interest and a 69% limited partnership interest in the partnerships that own the two properties. The remaining 30% limited partnership interest is owned by Donald J. Trump. In August 2005, Mr. Trump brought a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against, among others, the general partners of the partnerships referred to above relating to a dispute over the sale of properties located on the former Penn Central rail yards between West 59th and 72nd Streets in Manhattan which were formerly owned by the partnerships. In decisions issued in 2006, 2007 and 2009, the New York State Supreme Court dismissed all of Mr. Trump’s claims, and those decisions were affirmed by the Appellate Division. Mr. Trump cannot further appeal those decisions. In April 2010, Mr. Trump notified us of his intent to file a new suit claiming, among other things, that the limited partnerships should be dissolved. On April 29, 2010, we filed a motion for declaratory judgment in New York courts seeking to dispose of this claim. In June 2010, our motion was granted and a final judgment was entered that disposed of Mr. Trump’s claims with prejudice.
In July 2005, we acquired H Street Building Corporation (“H Street”) which has a subsidiary that owns, among other things, a 50% tenancy in common interest in land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as "Pentagon Row," leased to two tenants, Street Retail, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. In April 2007, H Street acquired the remaining 50% interest in that fee. On September 25, 2008, both tenants filed suit against us and the former owners claiming the right of first offer to purchase the fee interest, damages in excess of $75,000,000 and punitive damages. In April 2010, the Trial Court entered judgment in favor of the tenants, that we sell the land to the tenants for a net sales price of $14,992,000, representing the Trial Court’s allocation of our purchase price for H Street. The request for damages and punitive damages was denied. We have filed a notice of appeal and the Trial Court’s judgment is stayed pending the appeal. As a result of the Trial Court’s decision, we recorded a $10,056,000 loss accrual in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily representing previously recognized rental income.
69
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In the second quarter of 2010, we issued 29,782 common shares upon the redemption of Class A units of the Operating Partnership held by persons who received units, in private placements in earlier periods, in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate. The common shares were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on Section 4 (2) of that Act.
Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under Part III, Item 12 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and such information is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference and are listed in the attached Exhibit Index.
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
VORNADO REALTY TRUST |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph Macnow |
|
|
Joseph Macnow, Executive Vice President -
|
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
EXHIBIT 10.41
Vornado Reatly Trust
2010 Omnibus Share Plan
(As approved by shareholders on May 13, 2010)
Table of Contents
1. |
Purpose …………………………………………………………………………….. |
1 |
2. |
Shares Available for Awards ……………………………………………………… |
1 |
3. |
Administration …………………………………………………………………….. |
3 |
4. |
Eligibility ………………………………………………………………………….. |
3 |
5. |
Awards ……………………………………………………………………………. |
3 |
6. |
Stock Options ……………………………………………………………………... |
4 |
7. |
Stock Appreciation Rights ………………………………………………………… |
5 |
8. |
Performance Shares ……………………………………………………………….. |
5 |
9. |
Restricted Stock …………………………………………………………………… |
6 |
10. |
Other Stock-Based Awards ……………………………………………………….. |
6 |
11. |
Operating Partnership Units ………………………………………………………. |
8 |
12. |
Award Agreements ………………………………………………………………... |
9 |
13. |
Withholding ……………………………………………………………….............. |
9 |
14. |
Nontransferability ………………………………………………………………..... |
9 |
15. |
No Right to Employment ………………………………………………………….. |
10 |
16. |
Adjustment of and Changes in Shares……………………………………………... |
10 |
17. |
Amendment………………………………………………………………............... |
10 |
18. |
Effective Date ………………………………………………………………........... |
11 |
2
1. Purpose
The purpose of the 2010 Omnibus Share Plan of Vornado Realty Trust, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is to promote the financial interests of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Trust”), including its growth and performance, by encouraging employees of the Trust and its subsidiaries, including officers (together, the “Employees”), its non-employee trustees of the Trust and non-employee directors of its subsidiaries (together, the “Non-Employee Trustees”), and certain non-employee advisors and consultants that provide bona fide services to the Trust or its subsidiaries (together, the “Consultants”) to acquire an ownership position in the Trust, enhancing the ability of the Trust and its subsidiaries to attract and retain Employees, Non-Employee Trustees and Consultants of outstanding ability, and providing Employees, Non-Employee Trustees and Consultants with a way to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in the Trust’s success and to further align the interests of the Employees, Non-Employee Trustees and Consultants with shareholders of the Trust.
The Plan replaces the 2002 Omnibus Share Plan of Vornado Realty Trust, as amended (the “Predecessor Plan”), for awards granted on or after the Effective Date (as defined in Section 18 ). Awards may not be granted under the Predecessor Plan beginning on the Effective Date, but the adoption and effectiveness of the Plan will not affect the terms or conditions of any outstanding grants under the Predecessor Plan prior to the Effective Date.
2. Shares Available for Awards
Subject to the provisions of this Section 2 or any adjustment as provided in Section 16 , awards may be granted under the Plan with respect to 6,000,000 Share Equivalents (as defined below), which, in accordance with the share counting provisions of this Section 2, would result in the issuance of up to a maximum of 6,000,000 common shares, par value $.04, of beneficial interest in the Trust (the “Shares”) if all awards granted under the Plan were Full Value Awards (as defined below) and 12,000,000 Shares if all awards granted under the Plan were not Full Value Awards (which includes the number of Shares remaining under the Predecessor Plan as of March 15, 2010). No Participant (as defined in Section 3 ) who is an Employee shall be granted during any period of 12 consecutive months stock options, stock appreciation rights or any award intended to be “performance-based compensation” (as that term is used in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code) with respect to more than 12,000,000 Shares (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 16 ). The Shares issued under the Plan may be authorized and unissued Shares or treasury Shares, as the Trust may from time to time determine. Any Shares that are subject to awards that are not Full Value Awards shall be counted against the number of Share Equivalents available for the grant of awards under the Plan, as set forth in the first sentence of this Section 2 , as one-half Share Equivalent for every Share granted pursuant to an award; any Shares that are subject to awards that are Full Value Awards shall be counted as one Share Equivalent for every Share granted pursuant to an award. “Full Value Award” means an award under the Plan other than a stock option, stock appreciation right or other award that does not deliver to a Participant on the grant date of such award the full value of the underlying Shares. “Share Equivalent” shall be the measuring unit for purposes of the Plan to determine the number of Shares that may be subject to awards hereunder, which number of Shares shall not in any event exceed 12,000,000, subject to the provisions of this Section 2 or any adjustment as provided in Section 16 .
The Committee may, without affecting the number of Share Equivalents available pursuant to this Section 2, authorize the issuance or assumption of benefits under the Plan in connection with any merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, reorganization or similar transaction upon such terms and conditions as it may deem appropriate, subject to compliance with Section 409A (as defined in Section 16 ) and any other applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
Shares subject to an award granted under the Plan that expires unexercised, that is forfeited, terminated or cancelled, in whole or in part, or is paid in cash in lieu of Shares, shall thereafter again be available for grant under the Plan; provided, however, that the number of Share Equivalents that shall again be available for the grant under the Plan shall be increased by one Share Equivalent for each Share that is subject to a Full Value Award at the time such Full Value Award expires or is forfeited, terminated or cancelled and by one-half Share Equivalent for each Share that is subject to an award that is not a Full Value Award at the time such award expires or is forfeited, terminated or cancelled. Awards that use Shares as a reference but that are paid or settled in whole or in part in cash shall not affect the number of Share Equivalents available under the Plan pursuant to this Section 2 to the extent paid in cash. The number of Share Equivalents available for the purpose of awards under the Plan shall be reduced by (i) one-half of the gross number of Shares for which stock options or stock appreciation rights are exercised, regardless of whether any of the Shares underlying such awards are not actually issued to the Participant as the result of a net settlement and (ii) one-half of any Shares withheld to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to any award that is not a Full Value Award and one Share for each Share withheld to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to any Full Value Award, as described further in Section 13 .
3
The maximum aggregate number of Share Equivalents that may be granted under the Plan, as set forth in this Section 2, shall be cumulatively increased from time to time by the number of Shares subject to, or acquired pursuant to, that portion of any award granted under the Predecessor Plan and outstanding as of the Effective Date that, on or after the Effective Date, expires unexercised, that is forfeited, terminated or cancelled, in whole or in part, or is paid in cash in lieu of Shares; provided , however , that the number of Share Equivalents that shall again be available for grant under the Plan shall be increased by one-half Share Equivalent for each Share that is subject to an award granted under the Predecessor Plan that would not have been a Full Value Award if granted under the Plan at the time such award expires or is forfeited, terminated or cancelled.
The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code shall not exceed 12,000,000 Shares (as adjusted pursuant to the provisions of Section 16 ).
3. Administration
The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Trustees of the Trust. A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and the acts of a majority shall be the acts of the Committee. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Board of Trustees may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, grant awards or administer the Plan. In any such case, the Board of Trustees will have all of the authority and responsibility granted to the Committee herein.
Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall select the Employees, Non-Employee Trustees and Consultants who will be participants in the Plan (together, the “Participants”). The Committee shall (i) determine the type of awards to be made to Participants, determine the Shares or share units subject to awards, and (ii) have the authority to interpret the Plan, to establish, amend, and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the Plan, to determine the terms and provisions of any agreements entered into hereunder, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, based on, among other things, information made available to the Committee by the management of the Trust. The Committee may correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or in any award in the manner and to the extent it shall deem desirable to carry it into effect. The determinations of the Committee in its administration of the Plan, as described herein, shall be final and conclusive.
4. Eligibility
All Employees who have demonstrated significant management potential or who have the capacity for contributing in a substantial measure to the successful performance of the Trust, as determined by the Committee, and Non-Employee Trustees and Consultants, as determined by the Committee, are eligible to be Participants in the Plan.
4
5. Awards
Awards under the Plan may consist of the following: stock options (either incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or non-qualified stock options), stock appreciation rights, performance shares, grants of restricted stock and other-stock based awards, including OP Units (as defined in Section 11 ). Awards of performance shares, restricted stock or share units and other-stock based awards may provide the Participant with dividends or dividend equivalents and voting rights prior to vesting (whether based on a period of time or based on attainment of specified performance conditions). Unless the Committee otherwise specifies in the award agreement, if dividends or dividend equivalent rights are granted, dividends and dividend equivalents shall be paid to the Participant at the same time as the Trust pays dividends to common shareholders (even if the Shares subject to the underlying award are held by the Trust) but not less than annually and not later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the calendar year in which the dividends or dividend equivalents are credited (or, if later, the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the calendar year in which the dividends or dividend equivalents are no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Section 409A (as defined in Section 16 )); provided , however , that dividend and dividend equivalent payments in the case of an award that is subject to performance vesting conditions shall be treated as unvested so long as such award remains unvested, and any such dividend and dividend equivalent payments that would otherwise have been paid during the vesting period shall instead be accumulated (and, if paid in cash, reinvested in additional Shares based on the Surrender Value of the Shares on the date of reinvestment) and paid within 30 days following the date on which such award is determined by the Committee to have satisfied such performance vesting conditions. Any dividends or dividend equivalents that are accumulated and paid after the date specified in the preceding sentence may be treated separately from the right to other amounts under the award.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, Full Value Awards (a) that vest on the basis of the Participant’s continued employment or service shall be subject to a minimum vesting schedule of at least three years (with no more than one-third of the Shares subject thereto vesting earlier than a date 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which such award is granted and on each of the next two anniversaries of such initial vesting date) and (b) that vest on the basis of the attainment of performance goals shall provide for a performance period that ends no earlier than 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the commencement of the period over which performance is evaluated; provided , however , that the foregoing limitations shall not preclude the acceleration of vesting of any such award upon the death, disability or retirement of the Participant or upon an actual change in control (and not, for example, the commencement of a tender offer for the Trust’s shares or shareholder approval of a transaction that, if consummated, would result in an actual change in control). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Full Value Awards with respect to 5% of the maximum aggregate number of Share Equivalents available for the purpose of awards under the Plan pursuant to Section 2 may be granted under the Plan to any one or more Participants without respect to such minimum vesting provisions.
6. Stock Options
The Committee shall establish the option price at the time each stock option is granted, which price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value (as defined below) of the Shares. Stock options shall be exercisable for such period as specified by the Committee but in no event may options be exercisable more than ten years after their date of grant. No stock option shall be exercisable earlier than a date 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which such award is granted, except in the event of the Participant’s retirement, death or disability or an actual change in control. The option price of each Share as to which a stock option is exercised shall be paid in full at the time of such exercise. Such payment shall be made (i) in cash, (ii) by tender of Shares owned by the Participant valued at Surrender Value as of the date of exercise, (iii) to the extent approved by the Committee in its sole discretion, by surrender of all or part of the Shares issuable upon exercise of the option by the largest whole number of Shares with a Surrender Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price; provided, however, that the Trust shall accept a cash or other payment from the Participant to the extent of any remaining balance of the aggregate exercise price not satisfied by such reduction in the number of whole Shares to be issued, (iv) in such other consideration as the Committee deems appropriate, or (v) by a combination of cash, Shares and such other consideration.
5
For purposes of the Plan, (i) “Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a Share, the average of the high and the low prices reported for the Shares on the applicable date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange or, if not so reported, as determined in accordance with a valuation methodology approved by the Committee in a manner consistent with Section 409A, unless determined as otherwise specified herein and (ii) “Surrender Value” means, with respect to a Share, the closing price reported for the Shares on the applicable date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange or, if not so reported, as determined in accordance with a valuation methodology approved by the Committee in a manner consistent with Section 409A, unless determined as otherwise specified herein. For purposes of the grant of any award, the applicable date will be the trading day on which the award is granted or, if the date the award is granted is not a trading day, the trading day immediately prior to the date the award is granted. For purposes of the exercise of any award, the applicable date is the date a notice of exercise is received by the Trust or, if such date is not a trading day, the trading day immediately following the date a notice of exercise is received by the Trust.
7. Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock appreciation rights may be granted in tandem with a stock option, in addition to a stock option, or may be freestanding and unrelated to a stock option. Stock appreciation rights granted in tandem with or in addition to a stock option may be granted either at the same time as the stock option or at a later time. The Committee shall establish the grant price of each stock appreciation right granted at the time each such stock appreciation right is granted, which price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to such award. No stock appreciation right shall be exercisable earlier than a date 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which such award is granted, except in the event of the Participant’s retirement, death or disability or an actual change in control, or later than 10 years from the grant date of such award. A stock appreciation right shall entitle the Participant to receive from the Trust an amount equal to the increase of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the exercise of the stock appreciation right over the grant price. The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine whether the stock appreciation right shall be settled in cash, Shares or a combination of cash and Shares.
8. Performance Shares
Performance shares may be granted in the form of actual Shares or share units having a value equal to an identical number of Shares. In the event that a certificate is issued in respect of Shares subject to a grant of performance shares, such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Participant but shall be held by the Trust until the time the Shares subject to the grant of performance shares are earned. The performance conditions and the length of the performance period shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine whether performance shares granted in the form of share units shall be paid in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, performance shares granted under this Section 8 may, at the discretion of the Committee, be granted in a manner which is intended to be deductible by the Trust under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. In such event, the Committee shall follow procedures substantially equivalent to those set forth in Section 10 for Performance-Based Awards (as defined in Section 10 ).
9. Restricted Stock
Restricted stock may be granted in the form of actual Shares or share units having a value equal to an identical number of Shares. In the event that a certificate is issued in respect of Shares subject to a grant of restricted stock, such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Participant but shall be held by the Trust until the end of the restricted period. The employment conditions and the length of the period for vesting of restricted stock shall be established by the Committee at time of grant. The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine whether restricted stock granted in the form of share units shall be paid in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, restricted stock granted under this Section 9 may, at the discretion of the Committee, be granted in a manner which is intended to be deductible by the Trust under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. In such event, the Committee shall follow procedures substantially equivalent to those set forth in Section 10 for Performance-Based Awards.
6
10. Other Stock-Based Awards
Other types of equity-based or equity-related awards (including the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted Shares and performance stock and performance units settled in shares or cash) may be granted under such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, any other stock-based awards may, at the discretion of the Committee, be granted in a manner that is intended to be deductible by the Trust under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (a “Performance-Based Award”). In such event, the Committee shall follow the following procedures:
A Participant’s Performance-Based Award shall be determined based on the attainment of written objective performance goals approved by the Committee for a performance period generally of one year established by the Committee (i) while the outcome for that performance period is substantially uncertain and (ii) no more than 90 days after the commencement of the performance period to which the performance goal relates or, if less, the number of days which is equal to 25% of the relevant performance period. At the same time as the performance goals are established, the Committee will prescribe a formula to determine the amount of the Performance-Based Award that may be payable based upon the level of attainment of the performance goal during the performance period.
The performance goals shall be based on one or more of the following business criteria (either separately or in combination) with regard to the Trust (or a subsidiary, division, other operational unit or administrative department of the Trust): (i) pre-tax income, (ii) after-tax income, (iii) net income (meaning net income as reflected in the Trust’s financial reports for the applicable period, on an aggregate, diluted and/or per share basis), (iv) operating income, (v) cash flow, (vi) earnings per share, (vii) return on equity, (viii) return on invested capital or assets, (ix) cash and/or funds available for distribution, (x) appreciation in the Fair Market Value of Shares, (xi) return on investment, (xii) total return to shareholders, (xiii) net earnings growth, (xiv) stock appreciation (meaning an increase in the price or value of the Shares after the date of grant of an award and during the applicable period), (xv) related return ratios, (xvi) increase in revenues, (xvii) net earnings, (xviii) changes (or the absence of changes) in the per share or aggregate market price of the Shares, (xix) number of securities sold, (xx) earnings before any one or more of the following items: interest, taxes, depreciation or amortization for the applicable period, as reflected in the Trust’s financial reports for the applicable period, (xxi) total revenue growth (meaning the increase in total revenues after the date of grant of an award and during the applicable period, as reflected in the Trust’s financial reports for the applicable period), (xxii) total shareholder return, and (xxiii) funds from operations, as determined and reported by the Trust in its financial reports.
Performance criteria may be absolute amounts or percentages of amounts or may be relative to the performance of a peer group of real estate investment trusts or other corporations or indices.
Except as otherwise expressly provided, all financial terms are used as defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and all determinations shall be made in accordance with GAAP, as applied by the Trust in the preparation of its periodic reports to shareholders.
In addition, the performance goals may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of Trust (or subsidiary, division, other operational unit or administrative department of the Trust) performance under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other real estate investment trusts or the historic performance of the Trust. To the extent permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code, unless the Committee provides otherwise at the time of establishing the performance goals, for each fiscal year of the Trust, the Committee may (i) designate additional business criteria on which the performance goals may be based or (ii) provide for objectively determinable adjustments, modifications or amendments, as determined in accordance with GAAP, to any of the performance criteria described above for one or more of the items of gain, loss, profit or expense: (A) determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence, (B) related to the disposal of a segment of a business, (C) related to a change in accounting principle under GAAP, (D) related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of business under GAAP, and (E) attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Trust during the fiscal year.
Following the completion of each performance period, the Committee shall have the sole discretion to determine, based on information made available to the Committee by the management of the Trust, whether the applicable performance goals have been met with respect to a given Participant and, if they have, shall so certify and ascertain the amount of the applicable Performance-Based Award. No Performance-Based Awards will be paid for such performance period until such certification is made by the Committee. The amount of the Performance-Based Award actually paid to a given Participant may be less (but not more) than the amount determined by the applicable performance goal formula, at the discretion of the Committee. The amount of the Performance-Based Award determined by the Committee for a performance period shall be paid to the Participant at such time as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, after the end of such performance period.
7
11. Operating Partnership Units
Awards may be granted under the Plan in the form of undivided fractional limited partnership interests in Vornado Realty L.P. (together with any successor entity, the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, the entity through which the Trust conducts its business and an entity that has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, of one or more classes (“OP Units”) established pursuant to the Operating Partnership’s agreement of limited partnership, as amended from time to time. Awards of OP Units shall be valued by reference to, or otherwise determined by reference to or based on, Shares. OP Units awarded under the Plan may be (1) convertible, exchangeable or redeemable for other limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (including OP Units of a different class or series) or Shares, or (2) valued by reference to the book value, fair value or performance of the Operating Partnership. Awards of OP Units are intended to qualify as “profits interests” within the meaning of IRS Revenue Procedure 93-27, as clarified by IRS Revenue Procedure 2001-43, with respect to a Participant in the Plan who is rendering services to or for the benefit of the Operating Partnership, including its subsidiaries.
For purposes of calculating the number of Shares underlying an award of OP Units relative to the total number of Share Equivalents available for issuance under the Plan, the Committee shall establish in good faith the maximum number of Shares to which a Participant receiving such award of OP Units may be entitled upon fulfillment of all applicable conditions set forth in the relevant award documentation, including vesting conditions, partnership capital account allocations, value accretion factors, conversion ratios, exchange ratios and other similar criteria. If and when any such conditions are no longer capable of being met, in whole or in part, the number of Shares underlying such awards of OP Units shall be reduced accordingly by the Committee, and the number of Share Equivalents shall be increased by one Share Equivalent for each Share so reduced. Awards of OP Units may be granted either alone or in addition to other awards granted under the Plan. The Committee shall determine the eligible Participants to whom, and the time or times at which, awards of OP Units shall be made; the number of OP Units to be awarded; the price, if any, to be paid by the Participant for the acquisition of such OP Units; and the restrictions and conditions applicable to such award of OP Units. Conditions may be based on continuing employment (or other service relationship), computation of financial metrics and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives, with related length of the service period for vesting, minimum or maximum performance thresholds, measurement procedures and length of the performance period to be established by the Committee at the time of grant, in its sole discretion. The Committee may allow awards of OP Units to be held through a limited partnership, or similar “look-through” entity, and the Committee may require such limited partnership or similar entity to impose restrictions on its partners or other beneficial owners that are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Section 11 . The provisions of the grant of OP Units need not be the same with respect to each Participant.
Notwithstanding Section 5 of the Plan, the award agreement or other award documentation in respect of an award of OP Units may provide that the recipient of an award under this Section 11 shall be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred or contingent basis, dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to the number of Shares underlying the award or other distributions from the Operating Partnership prior to vesting (whether based on a period of time or based on attainment of specified performance conditions), as determined at the time of grant by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and the Committee may provide that such amounts (if any) shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares or OP Units.
OP Units awarded under this Section 11 may be issued for no cash consideration.
12. Award Agreements
Each award under the Plan shall be evidenced by an agreement setting forth the terms and conditions, as determined by the Committee, which shall apply to such award, in addition to the terms and conditions specified in the Plan.
13. Withholding
The Trust shall have the right to deduct from any payment to be made pursuant to the Plan, or to require prior to the issuance or delivery of any Shares or the payment of cash under the Plan, any taxes required by law to be withheld therefrom. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may permit a Participant who is an employee of the Trust or its subsidiaries to elect to satisfy such withholding obligation by having the Trust retain the number of Shares whose Fair Market Value equals the minimum statutory amount of taxes required by applicable law to be withheld. Any fraction of a Share required to satisfy such obligation shall be disregarded, and the amount due shall instead be paid in cash to or by the Participant, as the case may be.
8
14. Nontransferability
No award under the Plan shall be assignable or transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and no right or interest of any Participant shall be subject to any lien, obligation or liability of the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may determine, at the time of grant or thereafter, that an award (other than stock options intended to be incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code) is transferable by the Participant to such Participant’s immediate family members (or trusts, partnerships, or limited liability companies established for such immediate family members). For this purpose, immediate family member means, except as otherwise defined by the Committee, the Participant’s children, stepchildren, grandchildren, parents, stepparents, grandparents, spouse, siblings (including half brothers and sisters), in-laws and persons related by reason of legal adoption. Such transferees may transfer an award only by will or the laws of descent or distribution. An award transferred pursuant to this Section 14 shall remain subject to the provisions of the Plan, and shall be subject to such other rules as the Committee shall determine. Upon transfer of a stock option, any related stock appreciation right shall be canceled. Except in the case of a holder’s incapacity, an award shall be exercisable only by the holder thereof.
15. No Right to Employment
No person shall have any claim or right to be granted an award, and the grant of an award shall not be construed as giving a Participant any right to continue his or her service to the Trust or its subsidiaries as an Employee, Non-Employee Trustee or Consultant. Further, the Trust and its subsidiaries expressly reserve the right at any time to dismiss a Participant free from any liability, or any claim under the Plan, except as provided herein or in any agreement entered into hereunder.
16. Adjustment of and Changes in Shares
In the event of any change in the outstanding Shares by reason of any share dividend or split, reverse split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, spinoff, combination or exchange of Shares or other corporate change, or any distributions to common shareholders other than regular cash dividends, the Committee shall make such substitution or adjustment, if any, as it deems to be equitable, as to (i) the number of Share Equivalents for which awards may be granted under the Plan; (ii) the number or kind of Shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance pursuant to outstanding awards, (iii) the individual Participant limitation set forth in Section 2 , and (iv) the number of Shares set forth in Section 2 that can be issued through incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code; provided , however , that no such substitution or adjustment shall be required if the Committee determines that such action could cause an award to fail to satisfy the conditions of an applicable exception from the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 409A”) or otherwise could subject a Participant to the additional tax imposed under Section 409A in respect of an outstanding award; and further provided that no Participant shall have the right to require the Committee to make any adjustment or substitution under this Section 16 or have any claim or right whatsoever against the Trust or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or any of their respective trustees, directors, officer or employees in respect of any action taken or not taken under this Section 16 .
17. Amendment
The Committee may amend or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof from time to time, provided that no amendment shall be made without shareholder approval if such amendment (i) would increase the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan (other than pursuant to Section 16 ), (ii) would materially modify the requirements for participation in the Plan, (iii) would result in a material increase in the benefits accrued to Participants under the Plan, (iv) would reduce the exercise price of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights or cancel outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for cash, other awards or stock options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original stock options or stock appreciation rights (other than pursuant to Section 16 ) or (v) requires shareholder approval to comply with any applicable laws, regulations or rules, including the rules of a securities exchange or self-regulatory agency.
9
18. Effective Date
The Plan was adopted on February 18, 2010 by the Board of Trustees, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, which was given on March 25, 2010 and subject to the approval by the shareholders of the Trust at the 2010 Annual Meeting on May 13, 2010, and shall be effective as of the date of the approval by the requisite shareholders of the Trust at the 2010 Annual Meeting (the “Effective Date”). If the Plan is not so approved by the requisite shareholders of the Trust, then the Plan will be null and void in its entirety and the Predecessor Plan will remain in full force and effect. Subject to earlier termination pursuant to Section 17 , the Plan shall have a term of ten years from the Effective Date; provided , however , that all awards made under the Plan before its termination, and the Committee’s authority to administer the terms of such awards, will remain in effect until such awards have been satisfied or terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable award agreements; provided , further , that no awards (other than a stock option or stock appreciation right) that are intended by the Committee to be “performance-based” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (including any Performance-Based Awards) shall be granted on or after the first shareholder meeting that occurs in the fifth year following the year in which shareholders of the Trust previously approved the performance criteria in Section 10 unless the performance criteria are reapproved (or other designated performance criteria are approved) by the shareholders of the Trust on or before such shareholder meeting.
10
EXHIBIT 15.1
August 3, 2010
Vornado Realty Trust
New York, New York
We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Vornado Realty Trust for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, as indicated in our report dated August 3, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, is incorporated by reference in the following registration statements of Vornado Realty Trust:
Registration Statement No. 333-68462 on Form S-8
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-36080 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-64015 on Form S-3
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-50095 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-52573 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-29011 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-09159 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-76327 on Form S-3
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-89667 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-81497 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-102216 on Form S-8
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-102215 on Form S-3
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-102217 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-105838 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-107024 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-109661 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-114146 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-114807 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-121929 on Form S-3
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-120384 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-126963 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-139646 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-141162 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-150592 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-150593 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-166856 on Form S-3
and in the following joint registration statements of Vornado Realty Trust and Vornado Realty L.P.:
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-40787 on Form S-3
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-29013 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-108138 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-122306 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-138367 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-162775 on Form S-3
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
I, Michael D. Fascitelli, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vornado Realty Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
August 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
Michael D. Fascitelli |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
I, Joseph Macnow, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vornado Realty Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
August 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
Joseph Macnow |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
CERTIFICATION
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that :
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Michael D. Fascitelli |
|
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
CERTIFICATION
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that :
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Joseph Macnow |
|
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President and
|
|