Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (Form: 10-Q, Received: 02/16/2010 15:52:32)

MAGYAR BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Comparative Average Balance Sheets

(Dollars In Thousands)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009

Commission File Number 000-51726

Magyar Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	20-4154978
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

400 Somerset Street, New Brunswick, New Jersey	08901
(Address of Principal Executive Office)	(Zip Code)

(732) 342-7600

(Issuer’s Telephone Number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at February 1, 2010
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value	5,767,434

MAGYAR BANCORP, INC.

Form 10-Q Q uarterly Report

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		Page Number

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	28

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	29
Item 1a.	Risk Factors	29
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	29
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	29
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	29
Item 5.	Other Information	29
Item 6.	Exhibits	29

Signature Pages		30

Table of Contents

P A RT I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MAGYAR BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	December 31,			September 30,
	2009			2009
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash	$	3,423		$	3,529
Interest earning deposits with banks		605			4,392
Total cash and cash equivalents		4,028			7,921

Investment securities - available for sale, at fair value		13,836			18,083
Investment securities - held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $53,680
and $55,997 at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively)		53,724			55,951
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost		3,165			3,178
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,819 and $5,807 at
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively		434,811			438,997
Bank owned life insurance		11,110			10,996
Accrued interest receivable		2,150			2,207
Premises and equipment, net		20,396			20,622
Other real estate owned		8,976			5,562
Other assets		5,641			1,690

Total assets	$	557,837		$	565,207
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits	$	441,888		$	448,517
Escrowed funds		1,205			1,246
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances		54,854			55,127
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		15,000			15,000
Accrued interest payable		593			675
Accounts payable and other liabilities		4,462			4,615

Total liabilities		518,002			525,180

Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock: $.01 Par Value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		-			-
Common stock: $.01 Par Value, 8,000,000 shares authorized; 5,923,742
issued; 5,767,434 outstanding at December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, at cost		59			59
Additional paid-in capital		26,370			26,329
Treasury stock: 156,308 shares at December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, at cost		(1,897	)		(1,897	)
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares		(1,432	)		(1,454	)
Retained earnings		17,344			17,323
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(609	)		(333	)

Total stockholders' equity		39,835			40,027

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	557,837		$	565,207

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

MAGYAR BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

	For the Three Months
	Ended December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees	$	5,799		$	5,798
Investment securities
Taxable		695			834
Tax-exempt		2			33
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock		45			(17	)

Total interest and dividend income		6,541			6,648

Interest expense
Deposits		1,817			2,439
Borrowings		717			813

Total interest expense		2,534			3,252

Net interest and dividend income		4,007			3,396

Provision for loan losses		400			4,002

Net interest and dividend income after
provision for loan losses		3,607			(606	)

Other income
Service charges		242			206
Other operating income		118			110
Gains on sales of loans		76			-
Gains on sales of available-for-sale securities		79			-
					-
Total other income		515			316

Other expenses
Compensation and employee benefits		2,719			2,028
Occupancy expenses		622			645
Advertising		43			70
Professional fees		227			167
Service fees		145			145
FDIC deposit insurance premiums		267			79
Other expenses		401			417

Total other expenses		4,424			3,551

Loss before income tax expense		(302	)		(3,841	)

Income tax (benefit) expense		(323	)		19

Net income (loss)	$	21		$	(3,860	)

Net income (loss) per share-basic and diluted	$	0.004		$	(0.67	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

MAGYAR BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

																	Accumulated
	Common Stock				Additional						Unearned						Other
	Shares		Par		Paid-In			Treasury			ESOP			Retained		Comprehensive
	Outstanding		Value		Capital			Stock			Shares			Earnings			Loss			Total

Balance, September 30, 2009		5,767,434	$	59	$	26,329		$	(1,897	)	$	(1,454	)	$	17,323		$	(333	)	$	40,027

Comprehensive loss:
Net income		-		-		-			-			-			21			-			21
Unrealized loss on securities available-
for-sale, net of tax benefit of $109		-		-		-			-			-			-			(182	)		(182	)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included
in net loss, net of tax expense of $32		-		-		-			-			-			-			(47	)		(47	)
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of tax
benefit of $31		-		-		-			-			-			-			(47	)		(47	)
Total comprehensive loss																					(255	)

ESOP shares allocated		-		-		(12	)		-			22			-			-			10
Stock-based compensation expense		-		-		53			-			-			-			-			53

Balance, December 31, 2009		5,767,434	$	59	$	26,370		$	(1,897	)	$	(1,432	)	$	17,344		$	(609	)	$	39,835

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Table of Contents

MAGYAR BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In Thousands)

	For the Three Months
	Ended December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)
Operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	21		$	(3,860	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
(used) by operating activities
Depreciation expense		279			274
Premium amortization on investment securities, net		44			13
Proceeds from the sales of loans		1,875			-
Provision for loan losses		400			4,002
Gains on sale of loans		(76	)		-
Gains on sales of available for sale securities		(79	)		-
ESOP compensation expense		10			9
Stock-based compensation expense		53			116
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		57			(41	)
Increase in bank owned life insurance		(114	)		(107	)
Increase in other assets		(3,857	)		(168	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable		(82	)		57
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and other liabilities		(153	)		5
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities		(1,622	)		300

Investing activities
Net increase in loans receivable		(1,592	)		(18,324	)
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity		(3,069	)		-
Purchases of investment securities available for sale		-			(16,590	)
Sales of investment securities available for sale		3,285			-
Principal repayments on investment securities held to maturity		5,257			401
Principal repayments on investment securities available for sale		666			1,648
Purchases of premises and equipment		(53	)		(33	)
Investment in other real estate owned		(81)			-
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned		246			914
Redemption (purchase) of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		13			(998	)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		4,672			(32,982	)

Financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in deposits		(6,629	)		9,348
Stock compensation tax benefit		-			31
Net decrease in escrowed funds		(41	)		(41	)
Proceeds from long-term advances		-			4,000
Repayments of long-term advances		(273	)		(262	)
Net change in short-term advances		-			18,450
Purchase of treasury stock		-			(50	)
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(6,943	)		31,476
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(3,893	)		(1,206	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		7,921			5,013

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	4,028		$	3,807

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for
Interest	$	2,615		$	3,195
Income taxes	$	-		$	-
Non-cash investing activities
Real estate acquired in full satisfaction of loans in foreclosure	$	3,579		$	2,169

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

MAGYAR BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), its wholly owned subsidiary Magyar Bank, and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries Magyar Service Corporation, Hungaria Urban Renewal, LLC, and MagBank Investment Company. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company prepares its financial statements on the accrual basis and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP"). The unaudited information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.

Operating results for the three months ended December 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending September 30, 2010. The September 30, 2009 information has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the statement of condition date of December 31, 2009, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through February 16, 2010, the date these financial statements were issued.

NOTE B- RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued guidance, codified within Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, Earnings Per Share , that addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The implementation of this guidance, effective October 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance, codified within ASC 715, Compensation - Retirement Benefits , which provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by the guidance must be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is currently reviewing the effect this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) - Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Update amends the

Table of Contents

Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 . The amendments in this Update improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Comparability and consistency in accounting for transferred financial assets will also be improved through clarifications of the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. This Update is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the effect this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810) - Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities . This Update amends the Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) . The amendments in this Update replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which reporting entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The amendments in this Update also require additional disclosures about a reporting entity’s involvement in variable interest entities, which will enhance the information provided to users of financial statements. This Update is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the effect this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

The FASB has issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 to now require: (1) A reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and (2) In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures: (1) For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and (2) A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the effect this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTE C - CONTINGENCIES

The Company, from time to time, is a party to routine litigation that arises in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of this litigation, if any, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

NOTE D - EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. Stock options and restricted stock awards were anti-dilutive for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The following table shows the Company’s earnings per share for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months
	Ended December 31,
	2009		2008


Income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	21	$	(3,860	)
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic		5,779		5,765
Stock options and restricted stock		-		-
Weighted average number of common shares
and common share equivalents - diluted		5,779		5,765

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.004	$	(0.67	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.004	$	(0.67	)

Options to purchase 188,276 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $14.61 and 47,090 shares of restricted shares at a weighted average price of $14.55 were outstanding and not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 because the option price was greater than the average market price. Options to purchase 217,826 shares of common stock at an average price of $14.61 and 83,783 restricted stock at an average price of $14.51 were outstanding and not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2008.

NOTE E – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company follows FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. ASC 718 requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. The cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.

ASC 718 also requires the Company to realize as a financing cash flow rather than an operating cash flow, as previously required, the benefits of realized tax deductions in excess of previously recognized tax benefits on compensation expense. In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, the Company classified share-based compensation for employees and outside directors within

Table of Contents

“compensation and employee benefits” in the consolidated statement of operations to correspond with the same line item as the cash compensation paid.

Stock options generally vest over a five-year service period and expire ten years from issuance. Management recognizes compensation expense for all option grants over the awards’ respective requisite service periods. The fair values of all option grants were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Since there is limited historical information on the volatility of the Company’s stock, management also considered the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period in determining the assumed volatility rate used in the estimation of fair value. Management estimated the expected life of the options using the simplified method allowed under SAB No. 107. The 7-year Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant provides the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option. Management recognizes compensation expense for the fair values of these awards, which have graded vesting, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards. Once vested, these awards are irrevocable. Shares will be obtained from either the open market or treasury stock upon share option exercise.

Restricted shares generally vest over a five-year service period on the anniversary of the grant date. Once vested, these awards are irrevocable. The product of the number of shares granted and the grant date market price of the Company’s common stock determine the fair value of restricted shares under the Company’s restricted stock plans. Management recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of restricted shares on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The following is a summary of the status of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for its option plan for the three months ended December 31, 2009:


						Weighted
				Weighted		Average	Aggregate
	Number of			Average		Remaining	Intrinsic
	Stock Options			Exercise Price		Contractual Life	Value

Balance at September 30, 2009		217,826		$	14.61
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Forfeited		(29,550	)		14.61
Balance at December 31, 2009		188,276		$	14.61	7.2 years	$	-

Exercisable at December 31, 2009		87,130		$	14.61	7.2 years	$	-

At December 31, 2009, recipients of stock options under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan were entitled to 40% of the options awarded, or 87,130 shares. The following is a summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested options as of December 31, 2009:

				Weighted
	Number of			Average
	Non-Vested			Grant Date
	Stock Options			Fair Value

Balance at September 30, 2009		130,696		$	3.91
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Forfeited		(29,550	)		3.91
Balance at December 31, 2009		101,146		$	3.91

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the Company’s non-vested share awards as of and during the three months ended December 31, 2009:

				Weighted
				Average
	Number of			Grant Date
	Stock Awards			Fair Value

Balance at September 30, 2009		62,890		$	14.51
Granted		-			-
Vested		-			-
Forfeited		(15,800	)		14.36
Balance at December 31, 2009		47,090		$	14.55

Stock option and stock award expenses included with compensation expense were $40,000 and $13,000, respectively, for the three months ended December 31, 2009.

The Company announced in November 2007 its second stock repurchase program of up to 5% of its publicly-held outstanding shares of common stock, or 129,924 shares. Through December 31, 2009, the Company had repurchased a total of 66,970 shares of its common stock at an average cost of $9.39 per share under this program. Under the stock repurchase program, 62,954 shares of the 129,924 shares authorized remained available for repurchase as of December 31, 2009. The Company’s intended use of the repurchased shares is for general corporate purposes, including the funding of awards granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.

The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") for the benefit of employees of the Company and the Bank who meets the eligibility requirements as defined in the plan. The ESOP trust purchased 217,863 shares of common stock in the open market using proceeds of a loan from the Company. The total cost of shares purchased by the ESOP trust was $2.3 million, reflecting an average cost per share of $10.58. The Bank will make cash contributions to the ESOP on an annual basis sufficient to enable the ESOP to make the required loan payments to the Company. The loan bears a variable interest rate that adjusts annually every January 1 st to the then published Prime Rate (3.25% at January 1, 2010) with principal and interest payable annually in equal installments over thirty years. The loan is secured by shares of the Company’s stock.

As the debt is repaid, shares are released as collateral and allocated to qualified employees. Accordingly, the shares pledged as collateral are reported as unearned ESOP shares in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company accounts for its ESOP in accordance with SOP 93-6, “Employer’s Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans”, issued by the Accounting Standards Division of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”). As shares are released from collateral, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the then current market price of the shares, and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations.

At December 31, 2009, shares allocated to participants totaled 64,644. Unallocated ESOP shares held in suspense totaled 153,219 at December 31, 2009 and had a fair market value of $612,876. The Company's contribution expense for the ESOP was $10,000 and $10,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Table of Contents

NOTE F - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The components of comprehensive income (loss) and the related income tax effects are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2009								2008
				Tax		Net of					Tax			Net of
	Before Tax			Benefit		Tax			Before Tax		Benefit			Tax
	Amount			(Expense)		Amount			Amount		(Expense)			Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising
during period on:

Available-for-sale investments	$	(291	)	$	109	$	(182	)	$	1,065	$	(410	)	$	655

Less reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net income		(79	)		32		(47	)		-		-			-

Interest rate derivatives		(78	)		31		(47	)		91		(36	)		55

Other comprehensive income (loss), net	$	(448	)	$	172	$	(276	)	$	1,156	$	(446	)	$	710

NOTE G – FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Our securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets or liabilities on a non-recurring basis, such as held-to-maturity securities, mortgage servicing rights, loans receivable and other real estate owned, or OREO. These non-recurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

In accordance with ASC 820, we group our assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 -

Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2 -

Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 -

Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. The results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability.

We base our fair values on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 requires us to

Table of Contents

maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Securities available-for-sale
Our available-for-sale portfolio is carried at estimated fair value on a recurring basis, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss in stockholders’ equity. Our securities available-for-sale portfolio consists of U.S government and government-sponsored enterprise obligations, municipal bonds, and mortgage-backed securities. The fair values of these securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized pricing service. Our independent pricing service provides us with prices which are categorized as Level 2, as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are generally not available for the securities in our portfolio. Various modeling techniques are used to determine pricing for our mortgage-backed securities, including option pricing and discounted cash flow models. The inputs to these models include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data.

Derivative financial instruments

The Company uses interest rate floors to manage its interest rate risk. The interest rate floors have been designated as cash flow hedging instruments. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.

The following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying value of our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

	Fair Value at December 31, 2009
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(Dollars in thousands)
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	13,836	$	-	$	13,836	$	-
Derivatives		190		-		190		-
	$	14,026	$	-	$	14,026	$	-



	Fair Value at September 30, 2009
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(Dollars in thousands)
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	18,083	$	-	$	18,083	$	-
Derivatives		234		-		234		-
	$	18,317	$	-	$	18,317	$	-

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Mortgage Servicing Rights, net

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs) are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of MSR is determined through a calculation of future cash flows, incorporating estimates of assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value including market discount rates,

Table of Contents

prepayment speeds, servicing income, servicing costs, default rates and other market driven data, including the market’s perception of future interest rate movements and, as such, are classified as Level 3.

Impaired Loans

Loans which meet certain criteria are evaluated individually for impairment. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. All amounts due according to the contractual terms means that both the contractual interest and principal payments of a loan will be collected as scheduled in the loan agreement. Three impairment measurement methods are used, depending upon the collateral securing the asset: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate (the rate of return implicit in the loan); 2) the asset’s observable market price; or 3) the fair value of the collateral if the asset is collateral dependent. The regulatory agencies require this method for loans from which repayment is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. Our impaired loans are generally collateral dependent and, as such, are carried at the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. Fair value is estimated through current appraisals, and adjusted as necessary, by management, to reflect current market conditions and, as such, are generally classified as Level 3.

Appraisals of collateral securing impaired loans are conducted by approved, qualified, and independent third-party appraisers. Such appraisals are ordered via the Bank’s credit administration department, independent from the lender who originated the loan, once the loan is deemed impaired, as described in the previous paragraph. Impaired loans are generally re-evaluated with an updated appraisal within one year of the last appraisal. However, the Company also obtains updated appraisals on performing construction loans that are approaching their maturity date to determine whether or not the fair value of the collateral securing the loan remains sufficient to cover the loan amount prior to considering an extension. The Company discounts the appraised “as is” value of the collateral for estimated selling and disposition costs and compares the resulting fair value of collateral to the outstanding loan amount. If the outstanding loan amount is greater than the discounted fair value, the Company requires a reduction in the outstanding loan balance or additional collateral before considering an extension to the loan. If the borrower is unwilling or unable to reduce the loan balance or increase the collateral securing the loan, it is deemed impaired and the difference between the loan amount and the fair value of collateral, net of estimated selling and disposition costs, is charged off through a reduction of the allowance for loan loss.

Other Real Estate Owned

The fair value of the other real estate owned is determined through current appraisals, and adjusted as necessary, by management, to reflect current market conditions. As such, other real estate owned is generally classified as Level 3.

The following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying value of our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2009.

	Fair Value at December 31, 2009
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	118	$	-	$	-	$	118
Impaired loans		15,490		-		-		15,490
Other real estate owned		8,976		-		-		8,976
	$	24,584	$	-	$	-	$	24,584

Table of Contents

	Fair Value at September 30, 2009
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	103	$	-	$	-	$	103
Impaired loans		19,051		-		-		19,051
Other real estate owned		5,562		-		-		5,562
	$	24,716	$	-	$	-	$	24,716

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments not already disclosed above for which it is practicable to estimate fair value:

Cash and interest earning deposits with banks: The carrying amounts are a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Held to maturity securities: The fair values of our held to maturity securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized pricing service. Our independent pricing service provides us with prices which are categorized as Level 2, as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are generally not available for the securities in our portfolio.

Loans: Fair value for the loan portfolio, excluding impaired loans with specific loss allowances, is estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

Bank-owned life insurance: The carrying amounts are based on the cash surrender values of the individual policies, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated based on the amount of unamortized deferred loan commitment fees. The fair value of letters of credit is based on the amount of unearned fees plus the estimated costs to terminate the letters of credit. Fair values of unrecognized financial instruments including commitments to extend credit and the fair value of letter of credit are considered immaterial.

Deposits: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as money market deposit accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts and savings accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is equivalent to current market rates for deposits of similar size, type and maturity.

Accrued interest receivable and payable: For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances and securities sold under reverse repurchase agreements: The fair value of borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is equivalent to the rate currently offered by the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York for borrowings of similar maturity and terms.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 were as follows:

Table of Contents


	December 31, 2009				September 30, 2009
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)

Financial assets
Investment securities	$	67,560	$	67,516	$	74,034	$	74,080
Loan, net of allowance for loan losses	$	434,811	$	439,064	$	438,997	$	445,099
Bank owned insurance policies	$	11,110	$	11,110	$	10,996	$	10,996

Financial liabilities
Deposits
Demand, NOW and money market savings	$	233,766	$	233,766	$	228,076	$	228,076
Certificates of deposit		208,122		211,264		220,441		213,569

Total deposits	$	441,888	$	445,030	$	448,517	$	441,645

Borrowings	$	69,854	$	72,943	$	70,127	$	73,868

Interest rate derivatives	$	190	$	190	$	234	$	234

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated based on the amount of unamortized deferred loan commitment fees. The fair value of letters of credit is based on the amount of unearned fees plus the estimated cost to terminate the letters of credit. Fair values of unrecognized financial instruments including commitments to extend credit and the fair value of letters of credit are considered immaterial.

Cash and cash equivalent, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable are not presented in the above table as the carrying amounts shown is the consolidated balance sheet equals fair value.

NOTE H - INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The following table is an analysis of the amortized cost and fair values of securities available for sale at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009:

	At December 31, 2009									At September 30, 2009
			Gross		Gross							Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities available for sale:
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises:
Mortgage-backed securities - residential	$	7,063	$	146	$	-		$	7,209	$	10,703	$	216	$	(1	)	$	10,918
Debt securities		2,238		-		(17	)		2,221		2,237		6		-			2,243
Private label mortgage-backed securities - residential		4,989		-		(583	)		4,406		5,227		-		(305	)		4,922
Total securities available for sale	$	14,290	$	146	$	(600	)	$	13,836	$	18,167	$	222	$	(306	)	$	18,083

The maturities of the debt securities and mortgage backed securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2009 are summarized in the following table:

Table of Contents

	At December 31, 2009
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	-	$	-
Due after 1 but within 5 years		-		-
Due after 5 but within 10 years		-		-
Due after 10 years		2,238		2,221
Total debt securities		2,238		2,221

Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential (1)		12,052		11,615
Total	$	14,290	$	13,836

__________________

(1)

Mortgage-backed securities – residential include an amortized cost of $7.1 million and a fair value of $7.2 million for Obligation of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises issued by Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Also included are mortgage backed securities issued by non-U.S. government-sponsored enterprises with an amortized cost of $5.0 million and fair value of $4.4 million.

The following table is an analysis of the amortized cost and fair values of securities held to maturity at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009:

	At December 31, 2009									At September 30, 2009
			Gross		Gross							Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities held to maturity:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies:
Mortgage-backed securities - residential	$	17,675	$	6	$	(364	)	$	17,317	$	16,258	$	12	$	(378	)	$	15,892
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial		1,959		1		-			1,960		1,981		1		(1	)		1,981
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises:
Mortgage backed securities - residential		22,768		228		(121	)		22,875		22,757		215		(50	)		22,922
Debt securities		5,000		10		(28	)		4,982		8,020		43		-			8,063
Private label mortgage-backed securities - residential		2,200		69		(119	)		2,150		2,813		79		-			2,892
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		122		7		-			129		122		9		-			131
Corporate securities		4,000		267		-			4,267		4,000		116		-			4,116
Total securities held to maturity	$	53,724	$	588	$	(632	)	$	53,680	$	55,951	$	475	$	(429	)	$	55,997

The maturities of the debt securities and the mortgage backed securities held to maturity at December 31, 2009 are summarized in the following table:

Table of Contents

	At December 31, 2009
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	-	$	-
Due after 1 but within 5 years		4,122		4,396
Due after 5 but within 10 years		2,000		2,010
Due after 10 years		3,000		2,972
Total debt securities		9,122		9,378

Mortgage backed securities:
Residential (1)		42,643		42,342
Commercial (2)		1,959		1,960
Total	$	53,724	$	53,680

_____________________

(1)

Mortgage-backed securities – residential include an amortized cost of $17.7 million and a fair value of $17.3 million for obligations of U.S. government agencies issued by the Government National Mortgage Association. Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises includes obligations issued by Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation which had an amortized cost of $22.8 million and a fair value of $22.9 million. Also included are mortgage backed securities issued by non-U.S. government-sponsored enterprises with an amortized cost of $2.2 million and a fair value of $2.2 million.

(2)	Mortgage-backed securities – commercial include an amortized cost of $2.0 million and a fair value of $2.0 million for obligations of U.S. government agencies issued by the Small Business Administration.

NOTE I – IMPAIRMENT OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The Company recognizes credit-related other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities in earnings while noncredit-related other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities not expected to be sold are recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”).

We review our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and the intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market. We evaluate our intent and ability to hold debt securities based upon our investment strategy for the particular type of security and our cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy and interest rate risk position. In addition, the risk of future other-than-temporary impairment may be influenced by prolonged recession in the U.S. economy, changes in real estate values and interest deferrals.

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair value at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 for both available for sale and held to maturity securities by investment category and time frame for which the loss has been outstanding:

Table of Contents

			December 31, 2009
			Less Than 12 Months					12 Months Or Greater					Total
	Number of		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Securities		Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
			(Dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government agencies:
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		6	$	12,868	$	(364	)	$	-	$	-		$	12,868	$	(364	)
Obligations of U.S. government-
sponsored enterprises:
Mortgage backed securities - residential		2		3,200		(121	)		-		-			3,200		(121	)
Debt securities		2		5,193		(45	)		-		-			5,193		(45	)
Private label mortgage-backed securities:
Residential		4		2,975		(154	)		2,280		(548	)		5,255		(702	)
Total		14	$	24,236	$	(684	)	$	2,280	$	(548	)	$	26,516	$	(1,232	)





			September 30, 2009
			Less Than 12 Months					12 Months Or Greater					Total
	Number of		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Securities		Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
			(Dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government agencies:
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		5	$	8,967	$	(379	)	$	-	$	-		$	8,967	$	(379	)
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial		2		-		-			90		(1	)		90		(1	)
Obligations of U.S. government-
sponsored enterprises:
Mortgage backed securities - residential		5		10,497		(50	)		-		-			10,497		(50	)
Private label mortgage-backed securities:
Residential		3		2,244		(29	)		2,678		(276	)		4,922		(305	)
Total		15	$	21,708	$	(458	)	$	2,768	$	(277	)	$	24,476	$	(735	)

NOTE J – LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET

Loans receivable, net were comprised of the following:

	December 31,			September 30,
	2009			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)

One-to four-family residential	$	171,140		$	172,415
Commercial real estate		103,816			105,764
Construction		88,505			93,217
Home equity lines of credit		23,584			22,528
Commercial business		37,607			37,372
Other		15,928			13,484

Total loans receivable		440,580			444,780
Net deferred loan costs (fees)		50			24
Allowance for loan losses		(5,819	)		(5,807	)

Total loans receivable, net	$	434,811		$	438,997

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, non-performing loans, all of which were non-accrual, had a total principal balance of $30,270,000 and $33,484,000, respectively. The amount of interest income not recognized on loans was $776,000 and $823,000 for the three month periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, impaired loans, none of which were subject to specific loss allowances, totaled $27,725,000 and $32,694,000, respectively.

NOTE K - DEPOSITS

A summary of deposits by type of account are summarized as follows:

	December 31,		September 30,
	2009		2009
	(Dollars in thousands)

Demand accounts	$	33,005	$	35,221
Savings accounts		60,374		57,864
NOW accounts		54,059		49,456
Money market accounts		86,328		85,535
Certificates of deposit		176,561		187,289
Retirement certificates		31,561		33,152

	$	441,888	$	448,517

NOTE L – INCOME TAXES

The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Table of Contents

Where applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period of enactment. The valuation allowance is adjusted, by a charge or credit to income tax expense, as changes in facts and circumstances warrant. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences are deductible and carry forwards are available. Due to the uncertainty of the Company's ability to realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets, the net deferred tax assets are fully offset by a valuation allowance at December 31, 2009.

NOTE M - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate floors and collars, as part of its interest rate risk management. Interest rate caps and floors are agreements whereby one party agrees to pay or receive a floating rate of interest on a notional principal amount for a predetermined period of time if certain market interest rate thresholds are met. The Company considers the credit risk inherent in these contracts to be negligible.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company held one Prime-based interest rate floor. The counterparty in the transaction is Wachovia Bank, N.A. In accordance with cash flow hedge accounting, the amortization of the costs of the derivatives flowed through the Company’s income statement as a reduction to loan interest income. In addition, all changes in fair value of the derivative contracts are recorded through other comprehensive income.

The table below shows the notional amount, strike and maturity date of our interest rate derivative contract as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.


							Fair Value
	Notional					Maturity	December 31,		September 30,
	Amount		Strike			Date	2009		2009
							(Dollars in thousands)

Interest rate floor	$	5,000		7.25	%	12/27/10	$	190	$	234

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are commitments to extend credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheets.

Table of Contents

	December 31,		September 30,
	2009		2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
Financial instruments whose contract amounts
represent credit risk
Letters of credit	$	2,218	$	2,318
Unused line of credits		35,846		35,859
Fixed rate loan commitments		4,812		3,863
Variable rate loan commitments		775		1,120

	$	43,651	$	43,160

Table of Contents

Ite m 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this filing and in future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Company’s press releases or other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases, “anticipate,” “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimated,” “projected,” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward looking statements.” Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those risks previously disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC, general economic conditions, changes in interest rates, regulatory considerations, competition, technological developments, retention and recruitment of qualified personnel, and market acceptance of the Company’s pricing, products and services, and with respect to the loans extended by the Bank and real estate owned, the following: risks related to the economic environment in the market areas in which the Bank operates, particularly with respect to the real estate market in New Jersey; the risk that the value of the real estate securing these loans may decline in value; and the risk that significant expense may be incurred by the Company in connection with the resolution of these loans.

The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, and advises readers that various factors, including regional and national economic conditions, substantial changes in levels of market interest rates, credit and other risks of lending and investing activities, and competitive and regulatory factors, could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected.

The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Critical accounting policies may involve complex subjective decisions or assessments. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies.

Allowance for Loan Loss. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover credit losses in the loan portfolio both probable and reasonably estimable at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses which is charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, management makes significant estimates and has identified this policy as one of our most critical. Due to the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions utilized and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses, the methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management.

As a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans and discounted cash flow valuations of properties are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific loans. Assumptions for appraisals and discounted cash flow valuations are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could significantly affect the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting such appraisals and discounted cash flow valuations are carefully reviewed by management to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the related loans.

Table of Contents

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. We consider a variety of factors in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower, results of internal loan reviews and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates by management that may be susceptible to significant change based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions.

The evaluation has a specific and general component. The specific component relates to loans that are delinquent or otherwise identified as impaired through the application of our loan review process and our loan grading system. All such loans are evaluated individually, with principal consideration given to the value of the collateral securing the loan and discounted cash flows. Specific impairment allowances are established as required by this analysis. The general component is determined by segregating the remaining loans by type of loan, risk weighting (if applicable) and payment history. We also analyze historical loss experience, delinquency trends, general economic conditions and geographic and industry concentrations. This analysis establishes factors that are applied to the loan groups to determine the amount of the general component of the allowance for loan losses.

Actual loan losses may be significantly greater than the allowances we have established, which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

Deferred Income Taxes. The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009

Total assets decreased $7.4 million, or 1.3%, to $557.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $565.2 million at September 30, 2009. The quarterly decrease resulted from lower balances of cash and investment securities, which decreased $3.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively, partially offset by an increase in other assets.

Net loans receivable decreased $4.2 million, or 1.0%, to $434.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $439.0 million at September 30, 2009. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, construction loans decreased $4.7 million, or 5.1%, to $88.5 million. In addition, commercial real estate loans and one-to four-family residential mortgage loans decreased $1.9 million, or 1.8%, and $1.3 million, or 0.7%, to $103.8 million and $171.1 million, respectively. The decrease was offset by a $2.4 million, or 18.1%, increase in other loans, a $1.1 million, or 4.7%, in home equity lines of credit loans and a $235,000, or 0.6%, in commercial business loans to $15.9 million, $23.6 million and $37.6 million at December 31, 2009 from $13.5 million, $22.5 million and $37.4 million at September 30, 2009, respectively.

At December 31, 2009, the significant loan categories in terms of the percent of total loans were 38.8% in one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, 23.6% in commercial real estate loans, and 20.1% in construction loans. At September 30, 2009 these categories in terms of the percent of total loans were 38.4% in one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, 22.6% in commercial real estate loans, and 22.6% in

Table of Contents

construction loans. The remaining total loans were comprised of 8.5% commercial business, 5.4% home equity lines of credit and 3.6% of other loans, which consisted primarily of stock-secured consumer loans.

Total non-performing loans decreased $3.2 million to $30.3 million at December 31, 2009 from $33.5 million at September 30, 2009. The decrease was the result of the Bank’s acceptance of deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure of collateral securing two non-performing construction loans totaling $3.6 million and one non-performing commercial real estate loan totaling $318,000. Excluding the acceptances of deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure, non-performing loans increased $700,000, almost entirely due to a $600,000 commercial line of credit secured by real estate currently under contract of sale that is expected to pay off the non-performing loan.

Adverse economic conditions have led to higher levels of non-performing loans, particularly in the Company’s construction loan portfolio. The repayment of construction loans is typically dependent upon the sale of the collateral securing the loan, which has been negatively impacted by rapid deterioration in the housing market and decreased buyer demand. As a result, construction projects have slowed and reached their maturity dates. In order for the Company to extend the loans beyond the original maturity date, the value of the collateral securing the loan must be assessed, which is typically done by obtaining an updated third-party appraisal. Given the deterioration in the economy and, specifically, the housing market, updated valuations of the collateral reflect depreciation from earlier assessments. To the extent that an updated valuation of the collateral is insufficient to cover a collateral-dependent loan, the Company reduces the balance of the loan via a charge to the allowance for loan loss.

The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans receivable was 6.9% at December 31, 2009 compared with 7.5% at September 30, 2009. The allowance for loan losses remained $5.8 million at December 31, 2009, but increased to 19.2% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2009 compared with 17.3% of non-performing loans at September 30, 2009. Provision for loan loss during the three months ended December 31, 2009 was $400,000 while net charge-offs were $388,000. The allowance for loan losses was 1.32% of gross loans outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 1.31% of gross loans outstanding at September 30, 2009.

Investment securities decreased $6.4 million to $67.6 million at December 31, 2009 from $74.0 million at September 30, 2009. Proceeds from investment calls and principal repayments totaling $5.9 million, sales of $3.2 million in mortgage-backed securities and $370,000 in unrealized losses during the three months ended December 31, 2009 exceeded purchases totaling $3.1 million during the quarter.

Other real estate owned (OREO) increased $3.4 million during the three months to $9.0 million at December 31, 2009 from $5.6 million at September 30, 2009. The quarterly increase resulted primarily from the receipt of deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure on real estate securing two construction loans that had total carrying values of $3.6 million and one non-performing commercial real estate loan totaling $318,000 at September 30, 2009. One construction loan was secured by a substantially completed 24-unit condominium project in Newark, NJ. The loan had been written down to its appraised value at September 30, 2009 and was transferred to other real estate owned at its $2.7 million carrying value. The second construction loan was secured by eight residential lots in Newark, NJ, two of which had partially completed homes. The loan was written down $388,000 to the appraised value of real estate collateral, net of acquisition costs, during the three months ended December 31, 2009 and was transferred to other real estate owned at $568,000.

Other assets increased $3.9 million to $5.6 million at December 31, 2009 from $1.7 million at September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to the prepayment of three years’ FDIC insurance assessments during the three months ended December 31, 2009. The FDIC opted to collect future payments from all insured institutions in order to replenish the Deposit Insurance Fund. The Company’s prepayment totaled $3.8 million, of which $3.6 million was recorded as a prepaid asset at December 31, 2009.

Total deposits decreased $6.6 million, or 1.5%, to $441.9 million at December 31, 2009 from $448.5 million at September 30, 2009. The outflow in deposits occurred in certificates of deposit (including

Table of Contents

individual retirement accounts), which decreased $12.3 million to $208.1 million, and non-interest checking accounts, which decreased $2.2 million, or 6.3%, to $33.0 million. Partially offsetting these decreases were a $4.6 million increase in interest-bearing checking account balances, a $2.5 million increase in savings account balances, and a $793,000 increase in money market account balances. The Company’s improved net interest margin in the first quarter was largely a result of the managed outflow of higher rate certificates of deposit.

Included with the total deposits at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 were $12.3 million and $12.0 million, respectively, in Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) reciprocal certificates of deposit and $25.4 million and $15.9 million, respectively, in brokered certificates of deposit.

Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and securities sold under agreements to repurchase were relatively unchanged during the quarter, decreasing $273,000, or 0.4%, to $69.9 million at December 31, 2009 from $70.1 million at September 30, 2009.

Stockholders’ equity decreased $192,000, or 0.5%, to $39.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $40.0 million at September 30, 2009. The decrease was attributable to an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $276,000, partially offset by income from operations. For the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not repurchase shares of its stock.

Average Balance Sheets for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

The table on the following page presents certain information regarding the Company’s financial condition and net interest income for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The table presents the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing annualized income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from daily balances over the periods indicated. Interest income includes fees that we consider adjustments to yields.

Table of Contents

	For the Three Months Ended December 31,
	2009								2008
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/Cost (Annualized)			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/Cost (Annualized)
	(Unaudited)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits	$	606		$	-		0.15	%	$	202		$	1			0.92	%
Loans receivable, net		439,033			5,799		5.24	%		414,202			5,798			5.55	%
Securities
Taxable		70,381			695		3.92	%		65,331			833			5.06	%
Tax-exempt (1)		122			2		5.95	%		3,259			50			6.02	%
FHLB of NY stock		3,278			45		5.44	%		4,478			(17	)		-1.49	%
Total interest-earning assets		513,420			6,541		5.05	%		487,472			6,665			5.42	%
Noninterest-earning assets		44,120								44,870
Total assets	$	557,540							$	532,342

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts (2)	$	58,253			159		1.08	%	$	35,476			74			0.83	%
NOW accounts (3)		132,480			355		1.06	%		102,243			438			1.70	%
Time deposits (4)		211,453			1,303		2.44	%		216,805			1,927			3.53	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		402,186			1,817		1.79	%		354,524			2,439			2.73	%
Borrowings		72,241			717		3.99	%		101,533			813			3.18	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		474,427			2,534		2.12	%		456,057			3,252			2.83	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities		43,103								34,420
Total liabilities		517,530								490,477
Retained earnings		40,010								41,865
Total liabilities and retained earnings	$	557,540							$	532,342

Tax-equivalent basis adjustment					-								(17	)
Net interest income				$	4,007							$	3,396
Interest rate spread							2.93	%								2.59	%
Net interest-earning assets	$	38,993							$	31,415
Net interest margin (5)							3.10	%								2.76	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		108.22	%							106.89	%

Table of Contents

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

Net Income (Loss) . Net income increased $3.9 million, to $21,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from a net loss of $3.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008.

Net Interest and Dividend Income. Net interest and dividend income increased $611,000, or 18.0%, to $4.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from $3.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Total interest and dividend income decreased $107,000 to $6.5 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2009 while total interest expense decreased $718,000 to $2.5 million from the same three month period one year earlier. For the comparison period our interest rate spread increased 34 basis points to 2.93% from 2.59%.

Interest and Dividend Income. The decrease in interest and dividend income of $107,000, or 1.6%, to $6.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was primarily due to a decrease in the overall yield of interest-bearing assets to 5.05% from 5.42%, partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets of $25.9 million to $513.4 million from $487.5 million. Interest earned on loans remained $5.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared with the prior year period despite a $24.8 million increase in the average balance of loans between the periods. The increase in average balances of loans was offset by a 31 basis point decrease in the average yield on such loans to 5.24% from 5.55%. The decrease in yield between the two periods was due primarily to lower market interest rates and higher levels of non-performing loans.

Interest earned on our investment securities, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, decreased $170,000, or 19.6%, due to a 119 basis point decrease in the average yield on such securities to 3.92% for the three months ended December 31, 2008 from 5.11% for the three months ended December 31, 2008, partially offset by a $1.9 million, or 2.8%, increase in the average balance of such securities.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $718,000, or 22.1%, to $2.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from $3.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to a 71 basis point decrease in the average cost of such liabilities to 2.12% from 2.83%, partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $18.4 million, or 4.0%, to $474.4 million from $456.1 million.

The average balance of interest bearing deposits increased to $402.2 million from $354.5 million while the average cost of such deposits decreased to 1.79% from 2.73% in the lower market interest rate environment. As a result, interest paid on deposits decreased to $1.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from $2.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Average interest paid on advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased to $717,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from $813,000 for the prior year period. A decrease in the average balance of such borrowings to $72.2 million from $101.5 million was largely offset by a 76 basis point increase in the average cost of advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase to 3.94% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from 3.18% for the prior year period.

Provision for Loan Losses. We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to earnings, at a level necessary to absorb known and inherent losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the date of the financial statements. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, management considers historical loss experience, the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, peer group information and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or as future events occur. After an evaluation of these factors, management recorded a provision of $400,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to a provision of $4.0 million for the prior year period.

Table of Contents

The decrease in provision for loan losses was due to a slight decrease in non-performing loans and a decreased level of loan charge-offs during the three month period ended December 31, 2009 as compared with the three month period ended December 31, 2008 during which the Company experienced increasing levels of non-performing loans and higher levels of loan charge-offs. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, non-performing loans decreased $3.2 million to $30.3 million from $33.5 million at September 30, 2009.

Net charge-offs were $388,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared with $987,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The loan charge-offs during the three months ended December 31, 2009 resulted from the receipt of deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure on real estate securing two construction loans that had total carrying values of $3.6 million at September 30, 2009.

Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Management reviews the level of the allowance on a quarterly basis, and establishes the provision for loan losses based on the factors set forth in the preceding paragraph. As management evaluates the allowance for loan losses, the increased risk associated with larger non-homogenous construction, commercial real estate and commercial business loans may result in larger additions to the allowance for loan losses in future periods.

Other Income. Non-interest income increased $199,000, or 63.0%, to $515,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to $316,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The increase was attributable to $79,000 in gains on the sales of available-for-sale investment securities, $76,000 in gains on the sale of 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, and a $44,000 increase in service charges and other income in the current year period. The Company has been opportunistic with its sales of investment securities and fixed-rate residential mortgage loans given the current historically low levels of market interest rates.

Other Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased $874,000, or 24.6%, to $4.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from $3.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008.

Compensation and benefit expenses increased $691,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2009 due to the resignation of the Company’s former President and CEO, which resulted in a one-time charge of $852,000. This one-time charge was partially offset by a $161,000 reduction in compensation and benefit expenses from the same period one year earlier, which resulted from targeted expense reductions that included staff and benefit reductions in calendar year 2009.

FDIC insurance premiums increased $188,000, or 238.0%, to $267,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 from $79,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The FDIC has increased its assessment for all FDIC-insured institutions to sustain its Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), which has been depleted by mounting bank failures over the past 12 months.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. The Company recorded a tax benefit of $323,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared with tax expense of $19,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008.

The current period benefit resulted from a change in the tax laws that will allow the Company to carry back its 2008 losses to reduce taxable income for the past five years (previously two years) and obtain a refund of taxes already paid. Since the Company’s deferred tax assets, which included its net operating loss carry forward, were fully reserved against by a valuation allowance at September 30, 2009, the anticipated refund of prior taxes paid of $325,000 was recorded as a receivable on the balance sheet and a tax benefit on the income statement for the three months ended December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

The Company’s liquidity is a measure of its ability to fund loans, pay withdrawals of deposits, and other cash outflows in an efficient, cost-effective manner. The Company’s short-term sources of liquidity include maturity, repayment and sales of assets, excess cash and cash equivalents, new deposits, brokered deposits, other borrowings, and new advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. There has been no material adverse change during the three month period ended December 31, 2009 in the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to fund their operations.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had commitments outstanding under letters of credit of $2.2 million, commitments to originate loans of $5.6 million, and commitments to fund undisbursed balances of closed loans and unused lines of credit of $35.8 million. There has been no material change during the three months ended December 31, 2009 in any of the Company’s other contractual obligations or commitments to make future payments.

Capital Requirements

The Bank was in compliance with all of its regulatory capital requirements as of December 31, 2009.

Ite m 3- Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 4T – Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that Magyar Bancorp, Inc. files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.

There has been no change in Magyar Bancorp, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting during Magyar Bancorp, Inc.'s three months ended December 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

P A RT II - OTHER INFORMATION

It e m 1. Legal proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.

I t em 1A. Risk Factors

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

I t em 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

a.)

Not applicable.

b.)

Not applicable.

c.)

The Company did not repurchase any shares during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Ite m 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Ite m 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Ite m 5. Other Information

a.)

Not applicable.

b.)

There were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors during the period covered by the Form 10-Q.

Ite m 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

10.15

31.1

Separation Agreement, between Magyar Bancorp and Elizabeth E. Hance

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Table of Contents

S i gnatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	MAGYAR BANCORP, INC.
	(Registrant)




Date: February 16, 2010	/s/ John S. Fitzgerald
	John S. Fitzgerald
	Acting President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: February 16, 2010	/s/ Jon R. Ansari
	Jon R. Ansari
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	MAGYAR BANCORP
	MAGYAR BANCORP
	By:	/s/ Joseph J. Lukacs, Jr.
		Name: Joseph J. Lukacs, Jr.
		Title: Chairman

		EMPLOYEE:

		/s/ Elizabeth E. Hance
		ELIZABETH E. HANCE