|
|
GOLDCORP INC.
|
|
|
|
Date: April 25, 2018
|
|
/s/ Anna M. Tudela
|
|
Name: Anna M. Tudela
Title: Vice-President, Diversity, Regulatory
Affairs and Corporate Secretary
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description of Furnished Exhibit
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Form 52-109F2 Certification of Interim Filings - CEO
|
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
Form 52-109F2 Certification of Interim Filings - CFO
|
|
Page Number
|
|
Cautionary Statements
|
||
Quarter Highlights
|
||
Business Overview and Strategy
|
||
Corporate Developments
|
||
Market Overview
|
||
Quarterly Results
|
||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
||
Guidance
|
||
Operational and Projects Review
|
||
Non-GAAP Performance Measures
|
||
Risks and Uncertainties
|
||
Accounting Matters
|
||
Controls and Procedures
|
(1)
|
The Company has included non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis throughout this document. Adjusted operating cash flows and AISC per ounce are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages
31
-
38
of this MD&A.
|
(2)
|
Refer to footnote (4) on page
15
of this MD&A regarding the Company's projection of AISC.
|
(a)
|
Canadian Dollar/USD: Bank of Canada Noon rate (January 1, 2017 - April 28, 2017), Bank of Canada Daily Average (April 29, 2017 - March 31, 2018)
|
(b)
|
Mexican Peso/USD: Central Bank of Mexico Current Day Fixing
|
(c)
|
Argentine Peso/USD: Central Bank of Argentina Current Day Fixing
|
|
March 31
|
December 31
|
September 30
|
June 30
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
||||||||
Financial Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
846
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
$
|
853
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
$
|
915
|
|
$
|
822
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
Net earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
– Basic and diluted
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Operating cash flow
|
$
|
271
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
Adjusted operating cash flow
(1)
|
$
|
350
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
|
$
|
433
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
$
|
491
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
287
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
119
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
168
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Dividends paid
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Operating Results
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Gold produced (thousands of ounces)
|
590
|
|
655
|
|
646
|
|
761
|
|
633
|
|
715
|
|
635
|
|
613
|
|
||||||||
Gold sold (thousands of ounces)
|
585
|
|
646
|
|
633
|
|
768
|
|
606
|
|
686
|
|
649
|
|
616
|
|
||||||||
Silver produced (thousands of ounces)
|
6,800
|
|
7,100
|
|
7,100
|
|
7,400
|
|
7,000
|
|
7,700
|
|
7,400
|
|
5,300
|
|
||||||||
Copper produced (thousands of pounds)
|
5,400
|
|
9,700
|
|
4,500
|
|
20,400
|
|
6,300
|
|
16,900
|
|
7,900
|
|
14,400
|
|
||||||||
Lead produced (thousands of pounds)
|
27,000
|
|
32,400
|
|
36,500
|
|
29,600
|
|
38,300
|
|
33,700
|
|
26,100
|
|
17,100
|
|
||||||||
Zinc produced (thousands of pounds)
|
88,700
|
|
80,700
|
|
96,500
|
|
78,300
|
|
98,400
|
|
75,200
|
|
84,100
|
|
38,300
|
|
||||||||
Average realized gold price (per ounce)
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
$
|
1,236
|
|
$
|
1,286
|
|
$
|
1,181
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
$
|
1,333
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
$
|
1,277
|
|
Cash costs: by-product (per ounce)
(2)
|
$
|
511
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
$
|
554
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
Cash costs: co-product (per ounce)
(3)
|
$
|
696
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
$
|
644
|
|
$
|
716
|
|
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce)
|
$
|
810
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
827
|
|
$
|
812
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
$
|
1,067
|
|
(1)
|
The Company has presented the non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis in the table above. Adjusted operating cash flows, Adjusted EBITDA and AISC are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages
31
-
38
of this report.
|
(2)
|
Total cash costs: by-product, per ounce, is calculated net of Goldcorp’s share of by-product sales revenues (by-product silver sales revenues for Cerro Negro, Marlin and Pueblo Viejo; by-product lead, zinc and copper sales revenues and 75% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at market silver prices, and 25% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at $4.17 per silver ounce (2017 – $4.13 per silver ounce) sold to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. ("Wheaton") and by-product copper sales revenues for Alumbrera).
|
(3)
|
Total cash costs: co-product, per ounce, is calculated by allocating Goldcorp’s share of production costs to each co-product (Alumbrera (copper); Marlin (silver); Pueblo Viejo (silver and copper); Peñasquito (silver, lead and zinc)) based on the ratio of actual sales volumes multiplied by budget metal prices (see page
32
).
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2018
|
Three months ended March 31, 2017
|
||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share)
|
Pre-tax
|
After-tax
|
|
Per share
($/share)
|
|
Pre-tax
|
After-tax
|
Per share
($/share) |
||||||||||
Reduction in Goldcorp's share of Pueblo Viejo's earnings relating to settlement of a Dominican Republic tax audit
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Non-cash foreign exchange gain on deferred tax balances
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Gain from reduction in provision for Alumbrera's reclamation costs
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
2018
(1)
|
2017
(1)
|
Change
|
||||||
Gold
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Revenue (millions)
|
$
|
620
|
|
$
|
664
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
Ounces sold (thousands)
|
466
|
|
539
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
||
|
Average realized price ($/ounce)
|
$
|
1,334
|
|
$
|
1,236
|
|
8
|
%
|
Silver
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Revenue (millions)
|
$
|
81
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
Ounces sold (thousands)
|
6,003
|
|
6,769
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
||
|
Average realized price ($/ounce)
|
$
|
14.21
|
|
$
|
15.47
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Zinc
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Revenue (millions)
|
$
|
121
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
Pounds sold (thousands)
|
88,000
|
|
88,500
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
||
|
Average realized price
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
14
|
%
|
Other metals
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Revenue (millions)
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Total revenue (millions)
|
$
|
846
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
(1)
|
Excludes attributable share of revenues from the Company's associates. Revenues are shown net of applicable treatment and refining charges.
|
Three months ended March 31
|
2018
(1)
|
2017
(1)
|
Change
|
|||||
Depreciation and depletion (millions)
|
$
|
251
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
2
|
%
|
Sales ounces (thousands)
|
466
|
|
539
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
||
Depreciation and depletion per ounce
|
$
|
539
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
18
|
%
|
(1)
|
Excludes attributable share of depreciation and depletion from the Company's associates.
|
Three months ended March 31
|
2018
|
2017
|
Change
|
|||||
Pueblo Viejo
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
(67
|
)%
|
Alumbrera
|
—
|
|
33
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
||
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
(85
|
)%
|
(1)
|
AISC per ounce is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages
31
-
38
of this report.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Cash flow
|
|
|
||||
From continuing operations provided by operating activities
|
$
|
271
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
From continuing operations used in investing activities
|
(268
|
)
|
(247
|
)
|
||
From continuing operations used in financing activities
|
(66
|
)
|
54
|
|
||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(63
|
)
|
34
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
186
|
|
157
|
|
||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents reclassified as held for sale
|
—
|
|
(22
|
)
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
(1)
|
The Company has presented the non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis. Adjusted net debt is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information, please see pages
31
-
38
of this report.
|
Costs (+/- 5%)
(2, 3)
|
Units
|
2018E
|
2019E
|
2020E
|
2021E
|
AISC
(4)
|
$/oz
|
800
|
750
|
700
|
700
|
By-product Cash Costs
|
$/oz
|
450
|
400
|
400
|
400
|
Capital Expenditures (+/- 5%)
|
Units
|
2018E
|
2019E
|
2020E
|
2021E
|
Sustaining Capital
(2, 5)
|
$M
|
550
|
575
|
575
|
575
|
Expansionary Capital
(2, 5)
|
$M
|
750
|
250
|
300
|
300
|
Other 2018 Estimates
|
2018E
|
Corporate Administration ($M) (including non-cash stock compensation of $40M)
|
$140
|
Exploration ($M)
(2, 6)
|
$125
|
Depreciation and depletion ($/oz)
(2)
|
$485
|
Tax rate
(2)
|
40 - 45%
|
(1)
|
Guidance projections (“Guidance”) are considered “forward-looking statements” and represent management’s good faith estimates or expectations of future production results as of the date hereof. Guidance is based upon certain assumptions, including, but not limited to, metal prices, fuel prices, certain exchange rates and other assumptions. Such assumptions may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Consequently, Guidance cannot be guaranteed. As such, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon Guidance and forward-looking statements as there can be no assurance that the plans, assumptions or expectations upon which they are placed will occur. See the "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".
|
(2)
|
The Company has presented the non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis. AISC per ounce and cash costs: by-product are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information, please see pages
31
-
38
of this report.
|
(3)
|
The assumptions below were used to forecast total cash costs:
|
|
2018 - 2019
|
2020 - 2021
|
Gold (oz)
|
$1,300
|
$1,300
|
Silver (oz)
|
$19.00
|
$18.00
|
Copper (lb)
|
$2.75
|
$3.00
|
Zinc (lb)
|
$1.30
|
$1.15
|
Lead (lb)
|
$1.10
|
$1.00
|
Foreign exchange (respectively to the US$)
|
|
|
Canadian dollar
|
$1.25
|
$1.25
|
Mexican peso
|
19.00
|
19.00
|
(4)
|
The Company’s projected AISC are not based on GAAP total production cash costs, which forms the basis of the Company’s cash costs: by-product. The projected range of AISC is anticipated to be adjusted to include sustaining capital expenditures, corporate administrative expense, mine-site exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and amortization, and exclude the effects of expansionary capital and non-sustaining expenditures. Projected GAAP total production cash costs for the full year would require inclusion of the projected impact of future included and excluded items, including items that are not currently determinable, but may be significant, such as sustaining capital expenditures, reclamation cost accretion and amortization. Due to the uncertainty of the likelihood, amount and timing of any such items, the Company does not have information available to provide a quantitative reconciliation of projected AISC to a total production cash costs projection.
|
(5)
|
Excludes capitalized exploration costs (see footnote 6). Expansionary capital includes capital costs for those projects which are in execution and/or have an approved feasibility study. Projects without an approved feasibility study only include capital costs to the next stage gate.
|
(6)
|
Approximately 40% of exploration spending is expected to be expensed and approximately 60% is expected to be capitalized. Approximately 50% of exploration spending considered sustaining and approximately 50% is considered expansionary.
|
Three months ended
March 31
|
|
Revenue
($ millions)
|
|
Gold
produced
(000's of ounces)
|
|
Gold
sold
(000's of ounces)
|
|
Total cash
costs: by-product
($/oz)
(1), (4)
|
|
AISC
($/oz)
(3), (4)
|
|
Earnings (loss) from mine operations
($ millions)
|
|
Peñasquito
|
2018
|
329
|
|
98
|
|
90
|
|
(315
|
)
|
132
|
|
68
|
|
|
2017
|
356
|
|
137
|
|
138
|
|
85
|
|
391
|
|
91
|
|
Cerro Negro
|
2018
|
177
|
|
118
|
|
120
|
|
451
|
|
600
|
|
34
|
|
|
2017
|
121
|
|
95
|
|
88
|
|
459
|
|
651
|
|
15
|
|
Pueblo Viejo
(4)
|
2018
|
139
|
|
94
|
|
97
|
|
423
|
|
591
|
|
64
|
|
|
2017
|
122
|
|
95
|
|
95
|
|
439
|
|
541
|
|
66
|
|
Red Lake
|
2018
|
81
|
|
60
|
|
61
|
|
902
|
|
1,139
|
|
5
|
|
|
2017
|
66
|
|
49
|
|
54
|
|
861
|
|
1,149
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Éléonore
|
2018
|
86
|
|
67
|
|
65
|
|
1,051
|
|
1,204
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
2017
|
88
|
|
78
|
|
72
|
|
850
|
|
1,057
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Porcupine
|
2018
|
93
|
|
68
|
|
70
|
|
708
|
|
896
|
|
15
|
|
|
2017
|
76
|
|
61
|
|
62
|
|
843
|
|
1,011
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Musselwhite
|
2018
|
80
|
|
59
|
|
60
|
|
617
|
|
766
|
|
32
|
|
|
2017
|
69
|
|
54
|
|
56
|
|
713
|
|
871
|
|
19
|
|
Other mines
(2)
|
2018
|
42
|
|
26
|
|
22
|
|
1,046
|
|
1,175
|
|
4
|
|
|
2017
|
146
|
|
86
|
|
81
|
|
691
|
|
773
|
|
17
|
|
Other
(3)
|
2018
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
87
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
2017
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
66
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Attributable segment total
(4)
|
2018
|
1,027
|
|
590
|
|
585
|
|
511
|
|
810
|
|
198
|
|
|
2017
|
1,044
|
|
655
|
|
646
|
|
540
|
|
800
|
|
190
|
|
Less associates and joint venture
|
2018
|
(181
|
)
|
(120
|
)
|
(119
|
)
|
(536
|
)
|
(697
|
)
|
(67
|
)
|
|
2017
|
(162
|
)
|
(113
|
)
|
(107
|
)
|
(436
|
)
|
(551
|
)
|
(74
|
)
|
Total - Consolidated
|
2018
|
846
|
|
470
|
|
466
|
|
505
|
|
839
|
|
131
|
|
|
2017
|
882
|
|
542
|
|
539
|
|
561
|
|
849
|
|
116
|
|
(1)
|
Total cash costs: by-product, per ounce, is calculated net of Goldcorp’s share of by-product sales revenues (by-product copper sales revenues for Alumbrera; by-product silver sales revenues for Marlin and Pueblo Viejo; and by-product lead and zinc sales revenues and 75% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at market silver prices, and 25% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at $4.17 per silver ounce (2017 – $4.13 per silver ounce) sold to Wheaton). If silver, copper, lead and zinc were treated as co-products, total cash costs for the
three months ended March 31, 2018
would have been $
696
per ounce of gold (
three months ended March 31, 2017
– $
701
). Production costs are allocated to each co-product based on the ratio of actual sales volumes multiplied by budget metal prices (see page
32
).
|
(2)
|
As described above, the Company's investments in Alumbrera and Leagold are included in 'Other' for segment reporting purposes. They have been disclosed separately in these tables, in 'Other mines', along with Los Filos up to the date of its disposal on April 7, 2017 and Marlin up to the date of its closure in the second quarter of 2017, to provide visibility into the impact of the Company's corporate administration expense on AISC.
|
(3)
|
For the purpose of calculating AISC, the Company included corporate administration expense, capital expenditures incurred at the Company's regional and head corporate offices and regional office exploration expense as corporate AISC in the "Other" category. These costs are not allocated to the individual mine sites as the Company measures its operations' performance on AISC directly incurred at the mine site. AISC for Other was calculated using total corporate expenditures and the Company's total attributable gold sales ounces.
|
(4)
|
The Company has included certain non-GAAP performance measures including the Company’s share of the applicable production, sales and financial information of Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión throughout this document. Total cash costs: by-product and AISC are non-GAAP performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages
31
-
38
of this report.
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
Operating Data
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Change
|
|
||
Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
|
8,959
|
|
9,510
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
||
Mill head grade
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gold grade (grams/tonne)
|
0.54
|
|
0.75
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
||
Silver grade (grams/tonne)
|
23.52
|
|
21.19
|
|
11
|
%
|
||
Lead grade
|
0.19
|
%
|
0.22
|
%
|
(14
|
)%
|
||
Zinc grade
|
0.64
|
%
|
0.58
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
||
Mill Recovery Rate
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gold recovery
|
67
|
%
|
66
|
%
|
2
|
%
|
||
Silver recovery
|
85
|
%
|
82
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||
Lead recovery
|
76
|
%
|
76
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||
Zinc recovery
|
84
|
%
|
80
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
||
Payable Metal Produced
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gold (thousands of ounces)
|
98
|
|
137
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
||
Silver (thousands of ounces)
|
5,166
|
|
4,836
|
|
7
|
%
|
||
Lead (thousands of pounds)
|
27,000
|
|
32,400
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
||
Zinc (thousands of pounds)
|
88,700
|
|
80,700
|
|
10
|
%
|
||
Payable Metal Sold
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gold (thousands of ounces)
|
90
|
|
138
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
||
Silver (thousands of ounces)
|
4,943
|
|
4,825
|
|
2
|
%
|
||
Lead (thousands of pounds)
|
26,000
|
|
31,300
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
||
Zinc (thousands of pounds)
|
88,000
|
|
88,500
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
||
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
(315
|
)
|
$
|
85
|
|
(471
|
)%
|
Total Cash Costs: Co-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
708
|
|
$
|
668
|
|
6
|
%
|
AISC (per ounce)
|
$
|
132
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
(66
|
)%
|
Financial Data (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues
(1)
|
$
|
329
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Production costs
|
$
|
181
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
$
|
80
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
11
|
%
|
Earnings from mine operations
|
$
|
68
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
131
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
75
|
%
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
36
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
95
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
171
|
%
|
(1)
|
Includes 25% of silver ounces sold to Wheaton at $4.17 per ounce (2017 – $4.13 ounce). The remaining 75% of silver ounces are sold at market rates.
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
Operating Data
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Change
|
|
||
Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
|
243
|
|
239
|
|
2
|
%
|
||
Mill Gold grade (grams/tonne)
|
14.33
|
|
12.61
|
|
14
|
%
|
||
Mill Silver grade (grams/tonne)
|
141.3
|
|
106.5
|
|
33
|
%
|
||
Gold recovery rate
|
96
|
%
|
96
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||
Silver recovery rate
|
87
|
%
|
89
|
%
|
(2
|
)%
|
||
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
|
118
|
|
95
|
|
24
|
%
|
||
Silver Produced (thousands of ounces)
|
1,070
|
|
706
|
|
52
|
%
|
||
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
|
120
|
|
88
|
|
36
|
%
|
||
Silver Sold (thousands of ounces)
|
1,060
|
|
675
|
|
57
|
%
|
||
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
451
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Total Cash Costs: Co-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
524
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
AISC (per ounce)
|
$
|
600
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Financial Data (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues
|
$
|
177
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
46
|
%
|
Production costs
|
$
|
72
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
38
|
%
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
$
|
71
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
31
|
%
|
Earnings from mine operations
|
$
|
34
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
127
|
%
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
19
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
19
|
%
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
21
|
%
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
Operating Data
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Change
|
|
||
Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
|
858
|
|
730
|
|
18
|
%
|
||
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
|
3.75
|
|
4.50
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
||
Recovery rate
|
92
|
%
|
90
|
%
|
2
|
%
|
||
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
|
94
|
|
95
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
||
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
|
97
|
|
95
|
|
2
|
%
|
||
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
423
|
|
$
|
439
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Total Cash Costs: Co-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
482
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
4
|
%
|
AISC (per ounce)
|
$
|
591
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
9
|
%
|
Financial Data (in millions)
(1)
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues
|
$
|
139
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
14
|
%
|
Production costs
|
$
|
51
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
9
|
%
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
167
|
%
|
Earnings from mine operations
|
$
|
64
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
67
|
%
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
67
|
%
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
(1)
|
The Company’s 40% interest in Pueblo Viejo is classified as an investment in associate and is accounted for using the equity method with the Company’s share of net earnings and net assets separately disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of
Earnings
and Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. The financial data disclosed in the table represents the financial data of Pueblo Viejo on a proportionate rather than equity basis. For the
three months ended March 31, 2018
, the Company's equity earnings from Pueblo Viejo were $
9 million
(
three months ended March 31, 2017
– equity earnings of $27 million).
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
Operating Data
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Change
|
|
||
Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
|
160
|
|
111
|
|
44
|
%
|
||
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
|
10.99
|
|
14.29
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
||
Recovery rate
|
95
|
%
|
95
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
|
60
|
|
49
|
|
22
|
%
|
||
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
|
61
|
|
54
|
|
13
|
%
|
||
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
902
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
5
|
%
|
AISC (per ounce)
|
$
|
1,139
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Financial Data (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues
|
$
|
81
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
23
|
%
|
Production costs
|
$
|
55
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
17
|
%
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
$
|
21
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
—
|
%
|
Earnings (loss) from mine operations
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
n/a
|
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
21
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
24
|
%
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
13
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
167
|
%
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
Operating Data
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Change
|
|
||
Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
|
422
|
|
479
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
||
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
|
5.39
|
|
5.36
|
|
1
|
%
|
||
Recovery rate
|
90
|
%
|
92
|
%
|
(2
|
)%
|
||
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
|
67
|
|
78
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
||
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
|
65
|
|
72
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
||
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
24
|
%
|
AISC (per ounce)
|
$
|
1,204
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
14
|
%
|
Financial Data (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues
|
$
|
86
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Production costs
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
10
|
%
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
$
|
34
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
6
|
%
|
Loss from mine operations
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
200
|
%
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
(41
|
)%
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
(36
|
)%
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
Operating Data
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Change
|
|
||
Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
|
843
|
|
766
|
|
10
|
%
|
||
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
|
2.68
|
|
2.66
|
|
1
|
%
|
||
Recovery rate
|
93
|
%
|
92
|
%
|
1
|
%
|
||
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
|
68
|
|
61
|
|
11
|
%
|
||
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
|
70
|
|
62
|
|
13
|
%
|
||
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
708
|
|
$
|
843
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
AISC (per ounce)
|
$
|
896
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
Financial Data (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues
|
$
|
93
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
22
|
%
|
Production costs
|
$
|
49
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
$
|
29
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
7
|
%
|
Earnings (loss) from mine operations
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
n/a
|
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
28
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
100
|
%
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
43
|
%
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
18
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
157
|
%
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
Operating Data
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Change
|
|
||
Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
|
284
|
|
304
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
||
Average mill head grade (grams/tonne)
|
6.79
|
|
5.71
|
|
19
|
%
|
||
Average recovery rate
|
96
|
%
|
96
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
|
59
|
|
54
|
|
9
|
%
|
||
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
|
60
|
|
56
|
|
7
|
%
|
||
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
|
$
|
617
|
|
$
|
713
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
AISC (per ounce)
|
$
|
766
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
Financial Data (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues
|
$
|
80
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
16
|
%
|
Production costs
|
$
|
37
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
10
|
%
|
Earnings from mine operations
|
$
|
32
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
68
|
%
|
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
118
|
%
|
– Sustaining
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
14
|
%
|
– Expansionary
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
||||
Peñasquito
|
$
|
95
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
Musselwhite
|
16
|
|
4
|
|
||
Porcupine
|
18
|
|
7
|
|
||
Red Lake
|
10
|
|
4
|
|
||
Eleonore
|
8
|
|
15
|
|
||
Cerro Negro
|
7
|
|
2
|
|
||
Other
|
24
|
|
8
|
|
||
Total
|
$
|
178
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
•
|
Stakeholder engagement including communities, local and federal authorities and agencies, and commercial partners;
|
•
|
Geological review and geologic models update for both Cerro Casale and Caspiche with targeted completion in the third quarter of 2018;
|
•
|
Drilling campaign including infill, definition, geotechnical and metallurgical drilling for Cerro Casale and Caspiche;
|
•
|
District exploration program underway to review prospects, identify and drill test targets satellite deposits; and
|
•
|
Trade-off engineering studies of key value drivers including mining, metallurgy, water, power, and tailings.
|
•
|
Long life asset that can operate through multiple price cycles;
|
•
|
Phased development approach that reduces initial capital investment and execution risk;
|
•
|
Low C1 cash costs
(1)
in the first phases of development;
|
•
|
Extended mine life from 32 to 36 years, not including 205 million tonnes of Inferred Mineral Resources contained within the current pit designs;
|
•
|
Reduced environmental footprint, infrastructure requirements and energy and water use;
|
•
|
The use of desalinated water during operations, to protect freshwater resources;
|
•
|
Relocation of the tailings facility to the Relincho site in response to concerns expressed by local communities of the previously proposed El Morro tailings facility location within the agriculturally important Huasco River watershed, and
|
•
|
Significant further resource expansion potential and project optimization opportunities.
|
Note 1:
|
C1 cash costs for copper is defined as the cost of the product delivered to the port of shipment, excluding depreciation and amortization charges. It is common practice in the industry to exclude depreciation and amortization as these costs are ‘non-cash’ and discounted cash flow valuation models used in the industry substitute expectations of future capital spending for these amounts. In order to arrive at C1 cash costs for copper, the Company also deducts the costs of by-products and co-products. Total cash unit costs include the smelter and refining allowances. This presentation allows for a comparison of unit costs, including smelter allowances, to the underlying price of copper in order to assess the margin. The Company's projected C1 cash costs for copper are not based on GAAP total production cash costs. The projected range of C1 cash cost for copper is anticipated to be adjusted to include the costs of by-products and co-products and smelter and refining allowances. Projected GAAP total production cash costs for the full year would require inclusion of the projected impact of future included and excluded items, including items that are not currently determinable, but may be significant. Due to the uncertainty of the likelihood, amount and timing of any such items, we do not have information available to provide a quantitative reconciliation of projected cash costs to a total production C1 cash costs for copper projection.
|
|
Tonnes (million)
|
|
Copper Grade (%Cu)
|
|
Molybdenum Grade (%Mo)
|
Proven
|
552.2
|
|
0.34
|
|
0.014
|
Probable
|
899.8
|
|
0.36
|
|
0.017
|
Total
|
1,452.0
|
|
0.35
|
|
0.016
|
|
Tonnes (million)
|
|
Copper Grade (%Cu)
|
|
Molybdenum Grade (%Mo)
|
Measured
|
132.4
|
|
0.23
|
|
0.007
|
Indicated
|
329.2
|
|
0.31
|
|
0.011
|
Total M & I
|
461.6
|
|
0.29
|
|
0.010
|
Inferred
|
589.8
|
|
0.37
|
|
0.013
|
1.
|
Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are reported on a 100% basis using an average NSR cut-off of $8.50/t, which assumes metal prices of $3.00/lb copper and $7.50/lb molybdenum.
|
2.
|
Mineral Reserves are contained within a Life of Mine ("LOM") pit design. Mining will use conventional open pit methods and equipment with a stockpiling strategy.
|
3.
|
Metallurgical recoveries used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources average 88% for copper and 48% for molybdenum, but are variable by block.
|
4.
|
Pit slope inter-ramp angles used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources vary from 44-48º. The LOM strip ratio is 1.0 (Waste:Ore).
|
5.
|
Processing costs are $5.48/t of material milled and include concentrator and tailings management facility ("TMF").
|
6.
|
Desalination costs, make-up water, concentrate transport, port, and general and administrative ("G&A") are $2.97/t milled.
|
7.
|
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|
8.
|
Mineral Resources include inferred resources occurring within the LOM pit design and material contained within a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred optimized pit shell generated using the same economic and technical parameters as used for Mineral Reserves.
|
9.
|
Tonnage is reported in metric units, copper and molybdenum grades are reported as percentages.
|
10.
|
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes and grade where classification categories are combined.
|
|
Tonnes (million)
|
Copper Grade (%Cu)
|
Gold Grade (g/t Au)
|
Proven
|
333.6
|
0.58
|
0.55
|
Probable
|
243.2
|
0.45
|
0.38
|
Total
|
576.8
|
0.53
|
0.48
|
|
Tonnes (million)
|
Copper Grade (%Cu)
|
Gold Grade (g/t Au)
|
Measured
|
0.4
|
0.56
|
0.47
|
Indicated
|
52.8
|
0.67
|
0.85
|
Total M & I
|
53.2
|
0.67
|
0.85
|
Inferred
|
377.0
|
0.51
|
0.55
|
1.
|
Mineral Reserves and open pit Mineral Resources are reported on a 100% basis using an average NSR cut-off of $10.0/t, which assumes metal prices of $3.00/lb copper and $1,250/oz gold.
|
2.
|
Mineral Reserves are contained within a LOM pit design. Mining will use conventional open pit methods and equipment with a stockpiling strategy.
|
3.
|
Metallurgical recoveries used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources average 86% for copper and 66% for gold, but are variable by block.
|
4.
|
Pit slope inter-ramp angles used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources vary from 40-44º for Mineral Reserves. The LOM strip ratio for Mineral Reserves is 3.53 (Waste:Ore).
|
5.
|
Processing costs are $6.22/t of material milled and include concentrator and TMF.
|
6.
|
Desalination costs, make-up water, concentrate transport, port, and G&A are $2.97/t milled.
|
7.
|
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|
8.
|
Open pit Mineral Resources include inferred resources occurring within the LOM pit design and are reported using the same cut-off as used for Mineral Reserves. All Mineral Resources outside of the LOM pit design are defined using a conceptual underground mining envelope. This approach assumes same recoveries, metal prices, processing and G&A costs as used for the open pits but with mining costs and dilution assumptions that are more appropriate to bulk underground mining.
|
9.
|
Tonnage is reported in metric units; copper grades are reported as percentages and gold grades are reported as grams per tonne.
|
10.
|
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes and grade where classification categories are combined.
|
|
Phase 1
Year 1 to 3
|
Phase 2
Year 4 to 18
|
Phase 3
Year 19 to 36
|
Life of Mine
|
Strip ratio (tonnes waste:ore)
|
0.33:1
|
3.53:1
|
1.02:1
|
1.70:1
|
Tonnes milled (tonnes per day)
4
|
104,000
|
116,000
|
208,000
|
160,000
|
Copper grade (%Cu)
|
0.50
|
0.51
|
0.34
|
0.40
|
Molybdenum grade (%Mo)
1
|
0.026
|
0.019
|
0.015
|
0.016
|
Gold grade (g/t)
2
|
-
|
0.48
|
-
|
0.48
|
Contained copper production (tonnes per annum)
4
|
156,000
|
183,000
|
218,000
|
206,000
|
Contained molybdenum production (tonnes per annum)
1,4
|
3,900
|
260
|
5,400
|
5,000
|
Contained gold production (ounces per annum)
2,4
|
-
|
395,000
|
-
|
395,000
|
Contained copper equivalent production (tonnes per annum)
3,4
|
169,000
|
261,000
|
236,000
|
251,000
|
1.
|
LOM molybdenum grade and contained molybdenum production relates only to the average grade from Relincho ore. Some stockpiled ore from Relincho is processed in Phase 2 on a campaign basis.
|
2.
|
LOM gold grade and gold production relates only to the average grade from La Fortuna ore.
|
3.
|
Copper equivalent figures are calculated by converting molybdenum production into equivalent copper tonnage using $10 per pound molybdenum and $1,300 per ounce gold.
|
4.
|
LOM results do not include the first and last year of mine life.
|
|
Phase 1
Year 1 to 3
|
Phase 2
Year 4 to 18
|
Phase 3
Year 19 to 36
|
Life of Mine
|
Initial Capital ($, millions)
|
3,400 - 3,500
|
|
|
|
Major Enhancement Capital ($, millions)
|
-
|
2,600 - 2,700
|
1,000
|
|
Sustaining Capital ($, millions)
|
100
|
800-850
|
1,100-1,200
|
2,000-2,100
|
Operating Costs ($/tonne milled)
|
12
|
17
|
10
|
12-13
|
C1 Cash Costs (US$/payable pound Cu)
1
|
1.43
|
0.79
|
1.76
|
1.37
|
1.
|
C1 cash costs are presented after by-product credits assuming $10 per pound of molybdenum and $1,300 per ounce gold.
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|||
Gold (per ounce)
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
Silver (per ounce)
|
$
|
19.00
|
|
$
|
19.00
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
Copper (per pound)
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
Zinc (per pound)
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
Lead (per pound)
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
Production
Costs
(1)
|
By-Product Credits
|
Treatment and Refining Charges on Concentrate Sales
|
Other
|
Total Cash Costs: by-product
|
Ounces (thousands)
|
Total Cash Costs: by-product per ounce
(2), (3)
|
|||||||||||||
Peñasquito
|
$
|
181
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
$
|
23
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
90
|
|
$
|
(315
|
)
|
Cerro Negro
|
72
|
|
(18
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
54
|
|
120
|
|
451
|
|
||||||
Pueblo Viejo
|
51
|
|
(9
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
42
|
|
97
|
|
423
|
|
||||||
Red Lake
|
55
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
55
|
|
61
|
|
902
|
|
||||||
Éléonore
|
67
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
67
|
|
65
|
|
1,051
|
|
||||||
Porcupine
|
49
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
49
|
|
70
|
|
708
|
|
||||||
Musselwhite
|
37
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
37
|
|
60
|
|
617
|
|
||||||
Other mines
|
34
|
|
(12
|
)
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
23
|
|
22
|
|
1,046
|
|
||||||
Corporate
|
4
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
TOTAL - Attributable basis
|
$
|
550
|
|
$
|
(269
|
)
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
$
|
299
|
|
585
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
Less associates and joint ventures
|
(86
|
)
|
23
|
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
(64
|
)
|
(119
|
)
|
(536
|
)
|
||||||
Total - Consolidated
|
$
|
464
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
$
|
23
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
$
|
235
|
|
466
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
Production
Costs
(1)
|
By-Product Credits
|
Treatment and Refining Charges on Concentrate Sales
|
Other
|
Total Cash Costs: by-product
|
Ounces (thousands)
|
Total Cash Costs: by-product per ounce
(2), (3)
|
|||||||||||||
Peñasquito
|
$
|
193
|
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
$
|
45
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
138
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Cerro Negro
|
52
|
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
40
|
|
88
|
|
459
|
|
||||||
Pueblo Viejo
|
47
|
|
(5
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
42
|
|
95
|
|
439
|
|
||||||
Red Lake
|
47
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
47
|
|
54
|
|
861
|
|
||||||
Éléonore
|
61
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
61
|
|
72
|
|
850
|
|
||||||
Porcupine
|
53
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
53
|
|
62
|
|
843
|
|
||||||
Musselwhite
|
40
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
40
|
|
56
|
|
713
|
|
||||||
Other mines
|
103
|
|
(51
|
)
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
55
|
|
81
|
|
691
|
|
||||||
Corporate
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
TOTAL - Attributable basis
|
$
|
596
|
|
$
|
(295
|
)
|
$
|
48
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
646
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
Less associates and joint ventures
|
(76
|
)
|
32
|
|
(3
|
)
|
—
|
|
(47
|
)
|
(107
|
)
|
(436
|
)
|
||||||
Total - Consolidated
|
$
|
520
|
|
$
|
(263
|
)
|
$
|
45
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
539
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
(1)
|
$16 million
in royalties are included in production costs for the
three months ended
March 31, 2018
(
three months ended March 31, 2017
–
$23 million
).
|
(2)
|
Total cash costs: by-product per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in these tables due to rounding.
|
(3)
|
If silver, lead, zinc and copper for Peñasquito, silver for Marlin, silver and copper for Pueblo Viejo, and copper for Alumbrera were treated as co-products, Goldcorp's share of total cash costs: co-product for the
three months ended
March 31, 2018
, would be $
696
per ounce of gold, $
8.76
per ounce of silver, $
2.57
per pound of copper, $
0.82
per pound of zinc, and $
0.83
per pound of lead (
three months ended March 31, 2017
–
$701
per ounce of gold,
$9.47
per ounce of silver,
$1.92
per pound of copper,
$0.79
per pound of zinc, and
$0.94
per pound of lead).
|
|
Total cash costs: by-product
|
Corporate Administration
|
Exploration and evaluation costs
|
Reclamation cost accretion and amortization
|
Sustaining capital expenditures
|
Total AISC
|
Ounces (thousands)
|
Total AISC per ounce
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||
Peñasquito
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
90
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
Cerro Negro
|
54
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
|
72
|
|
120
|
|
600
|
|
|||||||
Pueblo Viejo
|
42
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
15
|
|
58
|
|
97
|
|
591
|
|
|||||||
Red Lake
|
55
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
13
|
|
70
|
|
61
|
|
1,139
|
|
|||||||
Éléonore
|
67
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
9
|
|
78
|
|
65
|
|
1,204
|
|
|||||||
Porcupine
|
49
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
10
|
|
62
|
|
70
|
|
896
|
|
|||||||
Musselwhite
|
37
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
8
|
|
46
|
|
60
|
|
766
|
|
|||||||
Other mines
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
25
|
|
22
|
|
1,175
|
|
|||||||
Corporate
(2)
|
—
|
|
41
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
51
|
|
—
|
|
87
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL - Attributable basis
|
$
|
299
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
585
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
Less associates and joint ventures
|
(64
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
(83
|
)
|
(119
|
)
|
(697
|
)
|
|||||||
Total - Consolidated
|
$
|
235
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
466
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
Total cash costs: by-product
|
Corporate Administration
|
Exploration and evaluation costs
|
Reclamation cost accretion and amortization
|
Sustaining capital expenditures
|
Total AISC
|
Ounces (thousands)
|
Total AISC per ounce
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||
Peñasquito
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
138
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
Cerro Negro
|
40
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
14
|
|
57
|
|
88
|
|
651
|
|
|||||||
Pueblo Viejo
|
42
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
51
|
|
95
|
|
541
|
|
|||||||
Red Lake
|
47
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
|
62
|
|
54
|
|
1,149
|
|
|||||||
Éléonore
|
61
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
|
76
|
|
72
|
|
1,057
|
|
|||||||
Porcupine
|
53
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
7
|
|
63
|
|
62
|
|
1,011
|
|
|||||||
Musselwhite
|
40
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
7
|
|
49
|
|
56
|
|
871
|
|
|||||||
Other mines
|
55
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
5
|
|
2
|
|
63
|
|
81
|
|
773
|
|
|||||||
Corporate
(2)
|
—
|
|
36
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6
|
|
42
|
|
—
|
|
66
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL - Attributable basis
|
$
|
349
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
646
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
Less associates and joint ventures
|
(47
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(9
|
)
|
(59
|
)
|
(107
|
)
|
(551
|
)
|
|||||||
Total - Consolidated
|
$
|
302
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
539
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
(1)
|
AISC may not calculate based on amounts presented in these tables due to rounding.
|
(2)
|
AISC for Corporate is calculated using total corporate expenditures and the Company's attributable gold sales ounces.
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Expenditures on mining interests per consolidated financial statements
|
$
|
267
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Payment of finance lease obligations per consolidated financial statements
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
||
Expenditures on mining interests by Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión
(1)
|
18
|
|
4
|
|
||
Goldcorp’s share of expenditures on mining interests and deposits
|
$
|
287
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
Sustaining capital expenditures
|
$
|
119
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
Expansionary capital expenditures
|
168
|
|
73
|
|
||
|
$
|
287
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
(1)
|
Expenditures on mining interests by Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión represent mining interest expenditures, net of additional funding investments, which are included in expenditures on mining interests per the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Exploration, evaluation and project costs per the consolidated financial statements
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Project exploration costs
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
Non-sustaining project costs
|
(10
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Exploration, evaluation and project costs per AISC
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
|
$
|
271
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
Change in working capital
|
8
|
|
23
|
|
||
Adjusted operating cash flows provided by Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera and Leagold
|
71
|
|
65
|
|
||
Goldcorp’s share of adjusted operating cash flows
|
$
|
350
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
•
|
income tax expense;
|
•
|
finance costs;
|
•
|
finance income; and
|
•
|
depreciation and depletion.
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Net earnings
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Income tax expense (recovery)
|
4
|
|
(48
|
)
|
||
Depreciation and depletion
|
251
|
|
246
|
|
||
Finance income
|
(9
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
||
Finance costs
|
30
|
|
36
|
|
||
EBITDA
|
$
|
343
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
|
(9
|
)
|
(60
|
)
|
||
Associates and joint venture EBITDA
|
92
|
|
87
|
|
||
Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net
|
—
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||
Non-cash share-based compensation
|
7
|
|
9
|
|
||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
433
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
271
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
Current income tax expense
|
59
|
|
70
|
|
||
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
|
9
|
|
60
|
|
||
Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
||
Increase in working capital
|
8
|
|
23
|
|
||
Finance costs
|
30
|
|
36
|
|
||
Finance income
|
(9
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
||
Other non-cash adjustments
|
(25
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
||
EBITDA
|
$
|
343
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
|
(9
|
)
|
(60
|
)
|
||
Associates and joint venture EBITDA
|
92
|
|
87
|
|
||
Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net
|
—
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||
Non-cash share-based compensation
|
7
|
|
9
|
|
||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
433
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
March 31
2018 |
|
December 31
2017 |
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
400
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
Long-term debt
|
2,035
|
|
1,984
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
(123
|
)
|
(186
|
)
|
||
Short term investments
|
(40
|
)
|
(48
|
)
|
||
Net Debt
|
2,272
|
|
2,249
|
|
||
Debt of associates and joint venture
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
Cash and short term investments of associates and joint venture
|
(186
|
)
|
(163
|
)
|
||
Adjusted Net Debt
|
$
|
2,086
|
|
$
|
2,086
|
|
At March 31, 2018
|
Possible exposure
(1)
|
Impact on earnings excluding currency exposure related to taxes
|
Impact on earnings from foreign exchange exposure related to taxes
|
||||
Canadian dollar
|
10%
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
Mexican peso
|
20%
|
17
|
|
82
|
|
||
Argentine peso
|
15%
|
4
|
|
44
|
|
•
|
IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is classified and measured at amortized cost or fair value. The classification and measurement of financial assets is based on the Company's business models for managing its financial assets and whether the contractual cash flows represent solely payments for principal and interest. Most of the requirements in IAS 39 for classification and measurement of financial liabilities were carried forward in IFRS 9. The change did not impact the carrying amounts of any of our financial assets on the transition date. The Company designated its equity securities as financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income ("FVTOCI"), where they will be recorded initially at fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value will be recognized in other comprehensive income only and will not be transferred into earnings (loss) upon disposition. As a result of this change, the Company reclassified $46 million of impairment losses recognized in prior years on certain equity securities which continue to be owned by the Company as at January 1, 2018 from opening deficit to accumulated other comprehensive income on January 1, 2018. As a result of adopting IFRS 9, the net change in fair value of the equity securities, including realized and unrealized gains and losses, if any, is now presented as an item that will not be reclassified subsequently to net earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Realized gains and losses on securities derecognized prior to January 1, 2018 have not been restated in prior year comparatives.
|
•
|
The adoption of the new "expected credit loss" impairment model under IFRS 9, as opposed to an incurred credit loss model under IAS 39, had a negligible impact on the carrying amounts of our financial assets on the transition date given the Company transacts exclusively with large international financial institutions and other organizations with strong credit ratings and the negligible historical level of customer default.
|
•
|
The new general hedge accounting requirements retain the three types of hedge accounting mechanisms previously available under IAS 39. Under IFRS 9 however, greater flexibility has been introduced to the types of transactions eligible for hedge accounting, specifically broadening the types of instruments that qualify for hedging instruments and the types of risk components of non-financial items that are eligible for hedge accounting. As a result, certain of the Company's hedging strategies and hedging instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting previously, primarily the hedging of its forecasted concentrate sales, are now eligible for hedge accounting. In addition, the effectiveness test has been replaced with the principle of an "economic relationship". Retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness is also no longer required. Enhanced disclosure requirements about an entity's risk management activities have also been introduced. As a result, subsequent to the adoption of IFRS 9, the Company hedged a certain percentage of its forecasted zinc and lead sales and has designated these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. These contracts were entered into during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The Company did not designate its economic hedges that existed as at January 1, 2018 as hedges for accounting purposes.
|
•
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company;
|
•
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Company’s Directors; and
|
•
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|||||
|
Note
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Revenues
|
3
|
$
|
846
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
Mine operating costs
|
|
|
|
||||
Production costs
|
3, 4
|
(464
|
)
|
(520
|
)
|
||
Depreciation and depletion
|
3, 9(d)
|
(251
|
)
|
(246
|
)
|
||
|
|
(715
|
)
|
(766
|
)
|
||
Earnings from mine operations
|
|
131
|
|
116
|
|
||
Exploration, evaluation and project costs
|
9(a)
|
(16
|
)
|
(8
|
)
|
||
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
|
10
|
9
|
|
60
|
|
||
Corporate administration
|
4(a)
|
(41
|
)
|
(36
|
)
|
||
Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
||
Restructuring costs
|
|
—
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Earnings from operations, associates and joint venture
|
3
|
83
|
|
134
|
|
||
Gain on derivatives, net
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
||
Finance costs
|
|
(30
|
)
|
(36
|
)
|
||
Other income, net
|
5
|
13
|
|
19
|
|
||
Earnings before taxes
|
|
71
|
|
122
|
|
||
Income tax (expense) recovery
|
6
|
(4
|
)
|
48
|
|
||
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net earnings per share
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic
|
7(a)
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Diluted
|
7(a)
|
0.08
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to net earnings:
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
||||
Equity securities
(note 2)
|
|
—
|
|
(4
|
)
|
||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
6
|
|
19
|
|
||
Reclassification of realized gains
|
|
|
|
||||
Equity securities
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges recognized in net earnings
|
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges recorded as property, plant and equipment
|
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
||
|
|
4
|
|
13
|
|
||
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to net earnings:
|
|
|
|
||||
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension plans
|
|
—
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Net change in equity securities
(note 2)
|
|
(29
|
)
|
—
|
|
||
|
|
(29
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
(25
|
)
|
12
|
|
||
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|||||
|
Note
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
||||
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
||||
Reclamation expenditures
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
||
Items not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation and depletion
|
3, 9(d)
|
251
|
|
246
|
|
||
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
|
10
|
(9
|
)
|
(60
|
)
|
||
Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net
|
|
—
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||
Share-based compensation
|
|
7
|
|
9
|
|
||
Unrealized gains on derivatives, net
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
||
Revision of estimates and accretion of closure cost obligations
|
|
7
|
|
6
|
|
||
Deferred income tax recovery
|
6
|
(55
|
)
|
(118
|
)
|
||
Other
|
|
20
|
|
7
|
|
||
Increase in working capital
|
8
|
(8
|
)
|
(23
|
)
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
271
|
|
227
|
|
||
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
||||
Expenditures on mining interests
|
3, 9(b)
|
(267
|
)
|
(180
|
)
|
||
Return of capital investment in associate
|
10
|
25
|
|
43
|
|
||
Interest paid
|
9(b)
|
(14
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
||
Purchases of short-term investments and available-for-sale securities, net
|
8
|
(8
|
)
|
(35
|
)
|
||
Settlement of deferred payment obligation
|
|
(4
|
)
|
—
|
|
||
Other
|
|
—
|
|
(65
|
)
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(268
|
)
|
(247
|
)
|
||
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
||||
Proceeds from issuance of term loans, net of borrowing costs
|
11(c)(i)
|
400
|
|
—
|
|
||
Debt repayments
|
11(c)(i)
|
(500
|
)
|
—
|
|
||
Draw down of credit facility, net
|
11(c)(i)
|
50
|
|
70
|
|
||
Finance lease payments
|
|
(2
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
||
Dividends paid to shareholders
|
7(b)
|
(14
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
||
Common shares issued
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
(66
|
)
|
54
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(63
|
)
|
34
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
|
186
|
|
157
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents reclassified as held for sale at the beginning of the period
|
|
—
|
|
20
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
8
|
$
|
123
|
|
211
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents reclassified as held for sale
|
|
—
|
|
(42
|
)
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, excluding amounts classified as held for sale, end of period
|
8
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
Note
|
At March 31
2018 |
|
At December 31
2017 |
|
||
Assets
|
|
|
|
||||
Current assets
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
8
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
40
|
|
48
|
|
||
Accounts receivable
|
|
139
|
|
146
|
|
||
Inventories
|
|
445
|
|
441
|
|
||
Sales and indirect taxes recoverable
|
|
263
|
|
250
|
|
||
Income taxes receivable
|
|
23
|
|
24
|
|
||
Other
|
|
38
|
|
48
|
|
||
|
|
1,071
|
|
1,143
|
|
||
Mining interests
|
|
|
|
||||
Owned by subsidiaries and joint operation
|
9
|
17,363
|
|
17,311
|
|
||
Investments in associates and joint venture
|
10
|
2,730
|
|
2,736
|
|
||
|
|
20,093
|
|
20,047
|
|
||
Equity securities
|
|
163
|
|
178
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes
|
|
86
|
|
112
|
|
||
Inventories
|
|
—
|
|
16
|
|
||
Other
|
|
202
|
|
189
|
|
||
Total assets
|
3
|
$
|
21,615
|
|
$
|
21,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
||||
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
Debt
|
11(c)(i)
|
400
|
|
499
|
|
||
Income taxes payable
|
|
128
|
|
98
|
|
||
Provisions and other
|
|
77
|
|
84
|
|
||
|
|
1,165
|
|
1,255
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes
|
|
2,981
|
|
3,063
|
|
||
Debt
|
|
2,035
|
|
1,984
|
|
||
Deferred payment obligation
|
|
180
|
|
182
|
|
||
Provisions
|
|
616
|
|
610
|
|
||
Finance lease obligations
|
|
239
|
|
242
|
|
||
Income taxes payable
|
|
133
|
|
122
|
|
||
Other
|
|
47
|
|
43
|
|
||
Total liabilities
|
3
|
7,396
|
|
7,501
|
|
||
Shareholders' equity
|
|
|
|
||||
Common shares, stock options and restricted share units
|
|
18,271
|
|
18,261
|
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
(48
|
)
|
23
|
|
||
Deficit
|
|
(4,004
|
)
|
(4,100
|
)
|
||
|
|
14,219
|
|
14,184
|
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
$
|
21,615
|
|
$
|
21,685
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Shares issued,
fully paid with
no par value
|
Amount
|
Stock options
and restricted
share units
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
At January 1, 2018
|
867,346
|
|
$
|
17,930
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
$
|
(4,100
|
)
|
$
|
14,184
|
|
Impact of adopting IFRS 9 on January 1, 2018
(note 2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(46
|
)
|
46
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
At January 1, 2018 (restated)
|
867,346
|
|
17,930
|
|
331
|
|
(23
|
)
|
(4,054
|
)
|
14,184
|
|
|||||
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net earnings
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
67
|
|
67
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(25
|
)
|
—
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|||||
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(25
|
)
|
67
|
|
42
|
|
|||||
Stock options exercised and restricted share units vested
|
1,525
|
|
25
|
|
(25
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7
|
|
|||||
Dividends
(note 7(b))
|
225
|
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(17
|
)
|
(14
|
)
|
|||||
At March 31, 2018
|
869,096
|
|
$
|
17,958
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
$
|
(4,004
|
)
|
$
|
14,219
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Shares issued,
fully paid with
no par value
|
Amount
|
Stock options and restricted share units
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
At January 1, 2017
|
853,812
|
|
$
|
17,733
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
$
|
(4,690
|
)
|
$
|
13,415
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net earnings
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
170
|
|
170
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
|||||
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
170
|
|
182
|
|
|||||
Stock options exercised and restricted share units vested
|
1,548
|
|
30
|
|
(30
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
|||||
Dividends
(note 7(b))
|
121
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(17
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
|||||
At March 31, 2017
|
855,481
|
|
$
|
17,765
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
$
|
(4,537
|
)
|
$
|
13,591
|
|
1
.
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
|
2
.
|
BASIS OF PREPARATION
|
•
|
IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is classified and measured at amortized cost or fair value. The classification and measurement of financial assets is based on the Company's business models for managing its financial assets and whether the contractual cash flows represent solely payments for principal and interest. Most of the requirements in IAS 39 for classification and measurement of financial liabilities were carried forward in IFRS 9. The change did not impact the carrying amounts of any of our financial assets on the transition date. The Company designated its equity securities as financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income ("FVTOCI"), where they will be recorded initially at fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value will be recognized in other comprehensive income only and will not be transferred into earnings (loss) upon disposition. As a result of this change, the Company reclassified $46 million of impairment losses recognized in prior years on certain equity securities which continue to be owned by the Company as at January 1, 2018 from opening deficit to accumulated other comprehensive income on January 1, 2018. As a result of adopting IFRS 9, the net change in fair value of the equity securities, including realized and unrealized gains and losses, if any, is now presented as an item that will not be reclassified subsequently to net earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Realized gains and losses on securities derecognized prior to January 1, 2018 have not been restated in prior year comparatives.
|
•
|
The adoption of the new "expected credit loss" impairment model under IFRS 9, as opposed to an incurred credit loss model under IAS 39, had a negligible impact on the carrying amounts of our financial assets on the transition date given the Company transacts
|
•
|
The new general hedge accounting requirements retain the three types of hedge accounting mechanisms previously available under IAS 39. Under IFRS 9 however, greater flexibility has been introduced to the types of transactions eligible for hedge accounting, specifically broadening the types of instruments that qualify for hedging instruments and the types of risk components of non-financial items that are eligible for hedge accounting. As a result, certain of the Company's hedging strategies and hedging instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting previously, primarily the hedging of its forecasted concentrate sales, are now eligible for hedge accounting. In addition, the effectiveness test has been replaced with the principle of an "economic relationship". Retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness is also no longer required. Enhanced disclosure requirements about an entity's risk management activities have also been introduced. As a result, subsequent to the adoption of IFRS 9, the Company hedged a certain percentage of its forecasted zinc and lead sales and has designated these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. These contracts were entered into during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The Company did not designate its economic hedges that existed as at January 1, 2018 as hedges for accounting purposes.
|
(a)
|
Revenue recognition as a result of adopting IFRS 15
|
3
.
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
|
Revenues
(a)(b)
|
Production costs
|
Depreciation
and depletion
|
Earnings (loss) from operations, associates and joint venture
(b)(c)
|
Expenditures on mining interests
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||
Éléonore
|
$
|
86
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Musselwhite
|
80
|
|
69
|
|
37
|
|
40
|
|
11
|
|
10
|
|
32
|
|
17
|
|
24
|
|
11
|
|
||||||||||
Porcupine
|
93
|
|
76
|
|
49
|
|
53
|
|
29
|
|
27
|
|
14
|
|
(6
|
)
|
28
|
|
14
|
|
||||||||||
Red Lake
|
81
|
|
66
|
|
55
|
|
47
|
|
21
|
|
21
|
|
2
|
|
(3
|
)
|
21
|
|
17
|
|
||||||||||
Peñasquito
|
329
|
|
356
|
|
181
|
|
193
|
|
80
|
|
72
|
|
66
|
|
90
|
|
129
|
|
73
|
|
||||||||||
Cerro Negro
|
177
|
|
121
|
|
72
|
|
52
|
|
71
|
|
54
|
|
29
|
|
14
|
|
19
|
|
16
|
|
||||||||||
Pueblo Viejo
|
139
|
|
122
|
|
51
|
|
47
|
|
24
|
|
9
|
|
65
|
|
66
|
|
15
|
|
9
|
|
||||||||||
Other
|
42
|
|
146
|
|
38
|
|
103
|
|
9
|
|
33
|
|
(49
|
)
|
9
|
|
32
|
|
15
|
|
||||||||||
Attributable segment total
|
1,027
|
|
1,044
|
|
550
|
|
596
|
|
279
|
|
258
|
|
143
|
|
181
|
|
285
|
|
184
|
|
||||||||||
Excluding attributable amounts from associates and joint venture
|
(181
|
)
|
(162
|
)
|
(86
|
)
|
(76
|
)
|
(28
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
(60
|
)
|
(47
|
)
|
(18
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
||||||||||
Consolidated total
|
$
|
846
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
At March 31, 2018
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|||
Éléonore
|
$
|
2,717
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
$
|
2,439
|
|
Musselwhite
|
576
|
|
148
|
|
428
|
|
|||
Porcupine
|
984
|
|
178
|
|
806
|
|
|||
Red Lake
|
1,714
|
|
79
|
|
1,635
|
|
|||
Peñasquito
|
8,477
|
|
3,108
|
|
5,369
|
|
|||
Cerro Negro
|
3,189
|
|
515
|
|
2,674
|
|
|||
Pueblo Viejo
|
1,732
|
|
—
|
|
1,732
|
|
|||
Other
|
2,226
|
|
3,090
|
|
(864
|
)
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
21,615
|
|
$
|
7,396
|
|
$
|
14,219
|
|
At December 31, 2017
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|||
Éléonore
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
$
|
2,462
|
|
Musselwhite
|
546
|
|
153
|
|
393
|
|
|||
Porcupine
|
990
|
|
196
|
|
794
|
|
|||
Red Lake
|
1,731
|
|
88
|
|
1,643
|
|
|||
Peñasquito
|
8,370
|
|
3,089
|
|
5,281
|
|
|||
Cerro Negro
|
3,285
|
|
531
|
|
2,754
|
|
|||
Pueblo Viejo
|
1,746
|
|
—
|
|
1,746
|
|
|||
Other
|
2,282
|
|
3,171
|
|
(889
|
)
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
21,685
|
|
$
|
7,501
|
|
$
|
14,184
|
|
(a)
|
The Company’s principal product is gold bullion which is sold primarily in the London spot market. Metal concentrate, containing both gold and by-product metals, is produced at Peñasquito and Alumbrera and is sold to third party smelters and traders. The Company’s consolidated revenues (excluding attributable share of revenues from Pueblo Viejo and Alumbrera) for the
three months ended March 31
were derived from the following:
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
xxxxxxxx
2018
|
xxxxxxxx
2017
|
||||||||
Gold
|
$
|
620
|
|
73
|
%
|
$
|
664
|
|
75
|
%
|
Silver
|
81
|
|
10
|
%
|
100
|
|
11
|
%
|
||
Zinc
|
121
|
|
14
|
%
|
93
|
|
11
|
%
|
||
Lead
|
23
|
|
3
|
%
|
19
|
|
2
|
%
|
||
Copper
|
1
|
|
—
|
%
|
6
|
|
1
|
%
|
||
|
$
|
846
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
882
|
|
100
|
%
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
Peñasquito
(1)
|
|
Cerro Negro
|
|
Pueblo Viejo
|
|
Other
|
|
||||
Gold
|
2018
|
$
|
121
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
2017
|
$
|
173
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Silver
|
2018
|
63
|
|
17
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
65
|
|
12
|
|
6
|
|
23
|
|
||||
Zinc
|
2018
|
121
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
93
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Lead
|
2018
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
19
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Copper
|
2018
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
11
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
22
|
|
||||
Molybdenum
|
2018
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
||||
Total
|
2018
|
$
|
329
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
2017
|
$
|
356
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
(1)
|
For the
three months ended March 31, 2018
and
2017
, Peñasquito's revenue related to provisional pricing adjustments on concentrate sales was not significant.
|
(b)
|
Intersegment sales and transfers are eliminated in the above information reported to the Company’s CODM. For the
three months ended March 31, 2018
, intersegment purchases included $130 million and $8 million, respectively, of gold and silver ounces purchased from Pueblo Viejo (
2017
– $116 million and $6 million, respectively) and revenues related to the sale of these ounces to external third parties were $130 million and $8 million, respectively (
2017
– $116 million and $6 million, respectively).
|
(c)
|
A reconciliation of attributable segment total earnings from operations, associates and joint venture to the Company's
earnings
before taxes per the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of
Earnings
is as follows:
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Attributable segment total earnings from operations, associates and joint venture
|
$
|
143
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
Adjustment to account for Pueblo Viejo, NuevaUnión, Leagold and Alumbrera on an equity method basis
|
(60
|
)
|
(47
|
)
|
||
Gain on derivatives, net
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
||
Finance costs
|
(30
|
)
|
(36
|
)
|
||
Other income, net
|
13
|
|
19
|
|
||
Earnings before taxes
|
$
|
71
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
4
.
|
PRODUCTION COSTS
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Raw materials and consumables
|
$
|
185
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
(a)
|
135
|
|
129
|
|
||
Contractors
|
89
|
|
106
|
|
||
Royalties
|
16
|
|
23
|
|
||
Transportation costs
|
14
|
|
11
|
|
||
Maintenance costs
|
10
|
|
8
|
|
||
Change in inventories
|
4
|
|
(33
|
)
|
||
Other
(b)
|
11
|
|
26
|
|
||
|
$
|
464
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
(a)
|
Salaries and employee benefits exclude
$16 million
of salaries and employee benefits included in corporate administration in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of
Earnings
for the
three months ended March 31, 2018
(
2017
–
$12 million
).
|
(b)
|
Other included a write down of prior period costs of $12 million relating to Peñasquito oxide heap leach inventories recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2017.
|
5
.
|
OTHER INCOME, NET
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Finance income
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Gains on sale of investments
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
||
Foreign exchange gain
|
7
|
|
21
|
|
||
Other
|
(3
|
)
|
(14
|
)
|
||
|
$
|
13
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
6
.
|
INCOME TAXES
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Current income tax expense
|
$
|
59
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
Deferred income tax recovery
|
(55
|
)
|
(118
|
)
|
||
Income tax expense (recovery)
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
(a)
|
the impact to earnings for non-deductible share based compensation expense of $7 million (2017 – $9 million), $nil of non-deductible reversals of impairment (2017 – $3 million), and $9 million of after-tax income from associates that are not subject to further income tax in the accounts of the Company (2017 – $60 million); and
|
(b)
|
the impact to taxes for changes in foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances and intra-group arrangements of a $16 million income tax recovery (2017 – $61 million), $4 million income tax expense for changes in foreign exchange rates on current tax balances (2017 – $4 million recovery), and $ 1 million income tax recovery for other items (2017 – $nil).
|
7
.
|
PER SHARE INFORMATION
|
(a)
|
Net
earnings
per share
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
||
(in millions)
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
868
|
|
854
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted share units
|
4
|
|
3
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
872
|
|
857
|
|
8
.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
At March 31
2018 |
|
At December 31
2017 |
|
||
Cash
|
$
|
85
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
Money market investments
|
38
|
|
2
|
|
||
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Accounts receivable decrease (increase)
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
Inventories decrease (increase)
|
3
|
|
(14
|
)
|
||
Sales and indirect taxes recoverable increase
|
(5
|
)
|
(23
|
)
|
||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (decrease) increase
|
(40
|
)
|
15
|
|
||
Income taxes payable increase, net of income taxes receivable
|
25
|
|
19
|
|
||
Other
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
||
Increase in working capital
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
(c)
|
The following table summarizes cash received and paid included in the Company's operating and investing activities during the three months ended
March 31
:
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Operating activities include the following cash received (paid):
|
|
|
||||
Interest received
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Interest paid
|
(18
|
)
|
(22
|
)
|
||
Income taxes refunded
|
1
|
|
9
|
|
||
Income taxes paid
|
(22
|
)
|
(49
|
)
|
||
Investing activities include the following cash (paid) received:
|
|
|
||||
Net (purchases) proceeds of short-term investments and available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
||||
Purchases of short-term investments
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments
|
15
|
|
3
|
|
||
Purchases of equity securities
|
(15
|
)
|
(40
|
)
|
||
Proceeds from sale of equity securities
|
—
|
|
5
|
|
||
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
9
.
|
MINING INTERESTS – OWNED BY SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT OPERATION
|
|
Mining properties
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Depletable
|
Non-depletable
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Reserves
and
resources
|
Reserves
and
resources
|
Exploration
potential
|
Plant and equipment
(e)
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
At January 1, 2018
|
$
|
13,296
|
|
$
|
5,832
|
|
$
|
5,258
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
$
|
31,124
|
|
Expenditures on mining interests
(a)(b)(c)
|
129
|
|
51
|
|
—
|
|
123
|
|
303
|
|
|||||
Transfers and other movements
|
5
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(14
|
)
|
(9
|
)
|
|||||
At March 31, 2018
|
13,430
|
|
5,883
|
|
5,258
|
|
6,847
|
|
31,418
|
|
|||||
Accumulated depreciation and depletion and impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
At January 1, 2018
|
(5,350
|
)
|
(2,769
|
)
|
(2,343
|
)
|
(3,351
|
)
|
(13,813
|
)
|
|||||
Depreciation and depletion
(d)
|
(162
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(82
|
)
|
(244
|
)
|
|||||
Transfers and other movements
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
|||||
At March 31, 2018
|
(5,512
|
)
|
(2,769
|
)
|
(2,343
|
)
|
(3,431
|
)
|
(14,055
|
)
|
|||||
Carrying amount – At March 31, 2018
|
$
|
7,918
|
|
$
|
3,114
|
|
$
|
2,915
|
|
$
|
3,416
|
|
$
|
17,363
|
|
|
Mining properties
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Depletable
|
Non-depletable
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Reserves
and
resources
|
Reserves
and
resources
|
Exploration
potential
|
Plant and equipment
(e)
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
At January 1, 2017
|
$
|
12,875
|
|
$
|
4,670
|
|
$
|
7,225
|
|
$
|
6,550
|
|
$
|
31,320
|
|
Acquisition of mining interest
|
—
|
|
529
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
531
|
|
|||||
Expenditures on mining interests
|
458
|
|
170
|
|
—
|
|
469
|
|
1,097
|
|
|||||
Removal of fully depreciated/depleted assets and disposals
|
(1,469
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(295
|
)
|
(1,767
|
)
|
|||||
Transfers and other movements
|
1,432
|
|
464
|
|
(1,965
|
)
|
12
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|||||
At December 31, 2017
|
13,296
|
|
5,832
|
|
5,258
|
|
6,738
|
|
31,124
|
|
|||||
Accumulated depreciation and depletion and impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
At January 1, 2017
|
(5,848
|
)
|
(2,510
|
)
|
(2,263
|
)
|
(3,134
|
)
|
(13,755
|
)
|
|||||
Depreciation and depletion
|
(654
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(354
|
)
|
(1,008
|
)
|
|||||
Impairment reversal, net
|
(294
|
)
|
(259
|
)
|
(80
|
)
|
(136
|
)
|
(769
|
)
|
|||||
Removal of fully depreciated/depleted assets and disposals
|
1,463
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
275
|
|
1,738
|
|
|||||
Transfers and other movements
|
(17
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
(19
|
)
|
|||||
At December 31, 2017
|
(5,350
|
)
|
(2,769
|
)
|
(2,343
|
)
|
(3,351
|
)
|
(13,813
|
)
|
|||||
Carrying amount – At December 31, 2017
|
$
|
7,946
|
|
$
|
3,063
|
|
$
|
2,915
|
|
$
|
3,387
|
|
$
|
17,311
|
|
|
Mining properties
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Depletable
|
Non-depletable
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Reserves
and
resources
|
Reserves
and
resources
|
Exploration
potential
|
Plant and equipment
(d)
|
At March 31
2018 |
|
At December 31
2017 |
|
||||||||||
Éléonore
|
$
|
1,586
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
905
|
|
$
|
2,576
|
|
$
|
2,596
|
|
Musselwhite
|
302
|
|
17
|
|
28
|
|
167
|
|
514
|
|
507
|
|
||||||
Porcupine
|
384
|
|
455
|
|
—
|
|
138
|
|
977
|
|
977
|
|
||||||
Red Lake
|
522
|
|
469
|
|
198
|
|
218
|
|
1,407
|
|
1,396
|
|
||||||
Coffee
|
—
|
|
441
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
442
|
|
434
|
|
||||||
Peñasquito
|
3,780
|
|
1,034
|
|
1,859
|
|
1,259
|
|
7,932
|
|
7,852
|
|
||||||
Cerro Negro
|
1,344
|
|
56
|
|
830
|
|
638
|
|
2,868
|
|
2,911
|
|
||||||
Norte Abierto
|
—
|
|
557
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
559
|
|
548
|
|
||||||
Corporate and other
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
88
|
|
88
|
|
90
|
|
||||||
|
$
|
7,918
|
|
$
|
3,114
|
|
$
|
2,915
|
|
$
|
3,416
|
|
$
|
17,363
|
|
$
|
17,311
|
|
(a)
|
Exploration, evaluation and project costs incurred by the Company during the
three months ended
March 31
were as follows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Total exploration, evaluation and project expenditures
|
$
|
29
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Less: amounts capitalized to mining interests
|
(13
|
)
|
(13
|
)
|
||
Total exploration, evaluation and project costs recognized in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Earnings
|
$
|
16
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
(b)
|
Expenditures on mining interests include finance lease additions, capitalized borrowing costs and deposits on mining interests, and are net of investment tax credits and exclude capitalized reclamation and closure costs. The following is a reconciliation of total capitalized expenditures on mining interests to expenditures on mining interests in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Capitalized expenditures on mining interests including associates and joint venture
|
$
|
311
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
Interest paid
|
(14
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
||
Increase in accrued expenditures
|
(30
|
)
|
(24
|
)
|
||
Expenditures on mining interests per Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
$
|
267
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
(c)
|
Expenditures on mining interests include capitalized borrowing costs incurred during the
three months ended
March 31
as follows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Red Lake - Cochenour
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Norte Abierto Project
|
5
|
|
—
|
|
||
Peñasquito - Pyrite Leach Project
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
||
Porcupine - Borden Project
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
$
|
15
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
(d)
|
A reconciliation of total depreciation and depletion during the
three months ended
March 31
to depreciation and depletion recognized in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of
Earnings
is as follows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Total depreciation and depletion
|
244
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
Less: amounts capitalized to mining interests
|
—
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Changes in amounts allocated to ending inventories
|
7
|
|
2
|
|
||
Total depreciation and depletion recognized in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Earnings
|
$
|
251
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
(e)
|
At
March 31, 2018
, assets not yet ready for intended use, and therefore not yet being depreciated, included in the carrying amount of plant and equipment amounted to $
566 million
(
December 31, 2017
–
$512 million
).
|
10
.
|
MINING INTERESTS – INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURE
|
|
Pueblo Viejo
(a)
|
|
NuevaUnión
|
|
Other
(b)
|
|
Total
|
|
||||
At January 1, 2018
|
$
|
1,746
|
|
$
|
919
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
$
|
2,736
|
|
Company’s share of net earnings of associates and joint venture
|
9
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
||||
Capital investment
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
||||
Return of capital investment
|
(25
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(25
|
)
|
||||
Other
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
||||
At March 31, 2018
|
$
|
1,732
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
At January 1, 2017
|
$
|
1,123
|
|
$
|
884
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,007
|
|
Company’s share of net earnings of associates and joint venture
(2)
|
142
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
144
|
|
||||
Acquisition of interest in Leagold
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
71
|
|
71
|
|
||||
Capital investment
|
—
|
|
33
|
|
—
|
|
33
|
|
||||
Return of capital investment
|
(65
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(65
|
)
|
||||
Reversal of impairment
|
557
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
557
|
|
||||
Other
|
(11
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11
|
)
|
||||
At December 31, 2017
|
$
|
1,746
|
|
$
|
919
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
$
|
2,736
|
|
(1)
|
The Company's share of net earnings of associates and joint venture for the three months ended March 31, 2017 of $60 million included $33 million arising from the reduction of the provision related to funding Alumbrera's reclamation costs
.
|
(a)
|
At
March 31, 2018
, the carrying amount of the Company's share of shareholder loans to Pueblo Viejo was $507 million (
December 31, 2017
– $506 million), which is included in the Company's investments in associates and joint venture and is being accreted to the face value over the term of the loans. Included in other current assets of the Company was a total of $
2 million
(
December 31, 2017
– $4 million) in interest receivable relating to the shareholder loan.
|
(b)
|
Other associates include the Company's interest in Leagold which at
March 31, 2018
had a quoted market value of $77 million (
December 31, 2017
– $80 million).
|
11
.
|
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED RISKS
|
(a)
|
Financial assets and liabilities by categories
|
At March 31, 2018
|
Amortized cost
|
|
FVTOCI
(1)
|
|
Fair value through profit or loss ("FVTPL")
(3)
|
|
Effective hedging instruments
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Short-term investments
|
40
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
40
|
|
|||||
Accounts receivable arising from sales of metal
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
102
|
|
—
|
|
103
|
|
|||||
Equity securities
(3)
|
—
|
|
163
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
163
|
|
|||||
Derivative assets designated as hedging instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
11
|
|
11
|
|
|||||
Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
|||||
Other current and non-current financial assets
|
34
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
34
|
|
|||||
Total financial assets
|
$
|
75
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Debt
|
$
|
(2,435
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(2,435
|
)
|
Deferred payment obligation
|
(180
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(538
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|||||
Other current and non-current financial liabilities
|
(254
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|||||
Total financial liabilities
|
$
|
(3,407
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(3,407
|
)
|
(1)
|
Investments in equity securities were designated as FVTOCI upon initial recognition as the management of the equity securities portfolio is not part of the Company's core operations. As such, the financial results of the portfolio should not be reflected in the Company's net earnings. Securities in the portfolio are disposed of when they no longer meet the Company's long term investment strategy. During the
three months ended March 31, 2018
, the Company did not recognize any cumulative gain (loss) (2017 – gain of $2 million) on the sale of its equity securities.
|
(2)
|
The Company's investments in publicly traded entities include its equity securities portfolio and its interest in Leagold, which is accounted for using the equity method
(note 10(b))
.
|
(3)
|
The Company does not hold any financial instruments that are designated as FVTPL.
|
At December 31, 2017
|
Amortized cost
|
|
FVTOCI
|
|
FVTPL
|
|
Effective hedging instruments
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
Short-term investments
|
48
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
48
|
|
|||||
Accounts receivable arising from sales of metal
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
110
|
|
—
|
|
113
|
|
|||||
Equity securities
|
—
|
|
178
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
178
|
|
|||||
Derivative assets designated as hedging instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
|||||
Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|||||
Other current and non-current financial assets
|
30
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
30
|
|
|||||
Total financial assets
|
$
|
81
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Debt
|
$
|
(2,483
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(2,483
|
)
|
Deferred payment obligation
|
(182
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(547
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|||||
Derivative liabilities designated as not hedging instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|||||
Other current and non-current financial liabilities
|
(257
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|||||
Total financial liabilities
|
$
|
(3,469
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(3,471
|
)
|
(i)
|
Fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
At March 31, 2018
|
|
At December 31, 2017
|
|
||||||||
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Accounts receivable arising from sales of metal concentrates
|
—
|
|
102
|
|
—
|
|
110
|
|
||||
Equity securities
|
163
|
|
—
|
|
178
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Derivative assets designated as cash flow hedges
|
—
|
|
11
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
||||
Derivative assets not designated as cash flow hedges
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
||||
Derivative liabilities not designated as cash flow hedges
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
(ii)
|
Valuation methodologies used in the measurement of fair value for Level 2 financial assets and liabilities
|
(iii)
|
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities not already measured at fair value
|
|
Level
|
Input
|
Carrying amount
(1)
|
Fair value
|
||||
$1.0 billion notes
|
1
|
Closing price
|
$
|
1,005
|
|
$
|
1,061
|
|
$1.5 billion notes
|
1
|
Closing price
|
995
|
|
999
|
|
||
Deferred payment obligation
|
2
|
4.75%
(2)
|
180
|
|
180
|
|
(1)
|
Includes accrued interest payable.
|
(2)
|
Represents the Company's current rate of borrowing for instruments of a similar term.
|
(c)
|
Financial instruments and related risks
|
At March 31, 2018
|
Possible exposure
(1)
|
Impact on earnings excluding currency exposure related to taxes
|
Impact on earnings from foreign exchange exposure related to taxes
|
||||
Canadian dollar
|
10%
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
Mexican peso
|
20%
|
17
|
|
82
|
|
||
Argentine peso
|
15%
|
4
|
|
44
|
|
12
.
|
CONTINGENCIES
|
CORPORATE OFFICE
|
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
|
|
|
Park Place
|
Toronto Stock Exchange: G
|
Suite 3400 – 666 Burrard Street
|
New York Stock Exchange: GG
|
Vancouver, BC V6C 2X8 Canada
|
|
Tel: (604) 696-3000
|
TRANSFER AGENT
|
Fax: (604) 696-3001
|
|
www.goldcorp.com
|
AST Trust Company (Canada)
|
|
1066 West Hastings Street, Suite 1600
|
TORONTO OFFICE
|
Vancouver, BC V6E 3X1 Canada
|
|
Toll free in Canada and the US: (800) 387-0825
|
Suite 3201 – 130 Adelaide Street West
|
Outside of Canada and the US: (416) 682-3860
|
Toronto, ON M5H 3P5 Canada
|
inquiries@canstockta.com
|
Tel: (416) 865-0326
|
www.canstockta.com
|
Fax: (416) 359-9787
|
|
|
AUDITORS
|
MEXICO OFFICE
|
|
|
Deloitte LLP
|
Paseo de las Palmas 425-15
|
Vancouver, BC
|
Lomas de Chapultepec
|
|
11000 Mexico, D.F.
|
INVESTOR RELATIONS
|
Tel: 52 (55) 5201-9600
|
|
|
Etienne Morin
|
GUATEMALA OFFICE
|
Toll free: (800) 567-6223
|
|
Email: info@goldcorp.com
|
5ta avenida 5-55 zona 14 Europlaza
|
|
Torre 1 Nivel 6 oficina 601
|
REGULATORY FILINGS
|
Guatemala City
|
|
Guatemala, 01014
|
The Company’s filings with the Ontario Securities Commission
|
Tel: (502) 2329-2600
|
can be accessed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
|
|
|
ARGENTINA OFFICE
|
The Company’s filings with the US Securities and
|
|
Exchange Commission can be accessed on EDGAR
|
Avda. Leandro N. Alem 855, Piso 27
|
at www.sec.gov.
|
C1001AAD Capital Federal
|
|
Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
|
Tel: 54 114 323 7000
|
|
|
|
CHILE OFFICE
|
|
|
|
Avenida Apoquindo 4501, Oficina
|
|
703 Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
|
|
Tel: 56 2 2898 9300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Review:
I have reviewed the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report and interim Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) (together, the “interim filings”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2018.
|
2.
|
No misrepresentations:
Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.
|
3.
|
Fair presentation:
Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.
|
4.
|
Responsibility:
The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings,
for the issuer.
|
5.
|
Design:
Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings,
|
5.1
|
Control framework:
The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
|
5.3
|
N/A.
|
6.
|
Reporting changes in ICFR:
The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2018 and ended on March 31, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.
|
Date: April 25, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ “David A. Garofalo”
|
|
Signature: David A. Garofalo
|
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|
1.
|
Review:
I have reviewed the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report and interim Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) (together, the “interim filings”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2018.
|
2.
|
No misrepresentations:
Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.
|
3.
|
Fair presentation:
Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.
|
4.
|
Responsibility:
The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.
|
5.
|
Design:
Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings,
|
(b)
|
designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.
|
5.1
|
Control framework:
The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
|
5.3
|
N/A.
|
6.
|
Reporting changes in ICFR:
The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2018 and ended on March 31, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.
|
Date: April 25, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ "Jason Attew"
|
|
Signature: Jason Attew
|
|
Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development
|