UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K
 
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of April 2018

Commission File Number: 001-12970

Goldcorp Inc.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)
 
Suite 3400 - 666 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2X8 Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F      o             Form 40-F        x
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____
 
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Exhibit 99.1 (Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018) and Exhibit 99.2 (Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2018) to this Report on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376, 333-181116, 333-188805, 333-195816 and 333-213153 on Form S-8, No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to the extent not superseded by documents or reports subsequently filed or furnished by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act of 1934, in each case as amended.









Signature
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
GOLDCORP INC.
 
 
Date: April 25, 2018
 
    /s/ Anna M. Tudela
 
Name: Anna M. Tudela
Title:    Vice-President, Diversity, Regulatory
             Affairs and Corporate Secretary











EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit
 
Description of Furnished Exhibit 
 
 
 
99.1 
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018
 
 
 
99.2
 
Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2018
 
 
 
99.3
 
Form 52-109F2 Certification of Interim Filings - CEO
 
 
 
99.4
 
Form 52-109F2 Certification of Interim Filings - CFO





A11354QUARTEYCOVERS2018V1AA0.JPG



Exhibit 99.1


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)
M ANAGEMENT’S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS
OF F INANCIAL C ONDITION AND R ESULTS OF O PERATIONS
F OR T HE T HREE M ONTHS E NDED M ARCH  31, 2018
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp” or “the Company”) for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and related notes thereto which have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 – Interim Financial Reporting of International Financial Reporting Standards (“GAAP” or “IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). All figures are in United States (“US”) dollars unless otherwise noted. References to C$ are to Canadian dollars. This MD&A has been prepared as of April 25, 2018 .

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Page Number
Cautionary Statements
Quarter Highlights
Business Overview and Strategy
Corporate Developments
Market Overview
Quarterly Results
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Guidance
Operational and Projects Review
Non-GAAP Performance Measures
Risks and Uncertainties
Accounting Matters
Controls and Procedures


GOLDCORP  |   1


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)



CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This MD&A contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, or in releases made by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), all as may be amended from time to time, and "forward-looking information" under the provisions of applicable Canadian securities legislation, concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Goldcorp. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead, the estimation of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources (as each term is defined below), the realization of Mineral Reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, targeted cost reductions, capital expenditures, free cash flow, costs and timing of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities, permitting and certification time lines, timing and cost of construction and expansion projects, hedging practices, currency exchange rate fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, health, safety and diversity initiatives, timing and possible outcome of pending litigation, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", "believes", or variations or comparable language of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "should", "might" or "will", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative connotation thereof.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performances or achievements of Goldcorp to be materially different from future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding Goldcorp’s present and future business strategies and the environment in which Goldcorp will operate in the future, including the price of gold, anticipated costs and ability to achieve goals. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performances or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others, gold price volatility, discrepancies between actual and estimated production, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources and metallurgical recoveries, mining operational and development risks, litigation risks, regulatory restrictions (including environmental regulatory restrictions and liability), changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or change in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States, Mexico, Argentina, the Dominican Republic, Chile or other jurisdictions in which the Company does or may carry on business in the future, delays, suspension and technical challenges associated with capital projects, higher prices for fuel, steel, power, labour and other consumables, currency fluctuations, the speculative nature of gold exploration, the global economic climate, dilution, share price volatility, competition, loss of key employees, additional funding requirements and defective title to mineral claims or property. Although Goldcorp believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended.
Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Goldcorp to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: future prices of gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead; mine development and operating risks; possible variations in ore reserves, grade or recovery rates; risks related to international operations, including economic and political instability in foreign jurisdictions in which Goldcorp operates; risks related to current global financial conditions; risks related to joint venture operations; actual results of current exploration activities; actual results of current reclamation activities; environmental risks; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; risks associated with restructuring and cost-efficiency initiatives; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities; risks related to the integration of acquisitions; risks related to indebtedness and the service of such indebtedness, as well as those factors discussed in the section entitled "Description of the Business - Risk Factors” in Goldcorp’s most recent annual information form available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. Although Goldcorp has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. Except as otherwise indicated by Goldcorp, these statements do not reflect the potential impact of any non-recurring or other special items or of any disposition, monetization, merger, acquisition, other business combination or other transaction that may be announced or that may occur after the date hereof. Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of providing information about management’s current expectations and plans and allowing investors and others to get a better understanding of Goldcorp's operating environment. Goldcorp does not intend or undertake to publicly update any forward-looking statements that are included in this document, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING CERTAIN MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE
This MD&A presents certain measures, including "total cash costs: by-product", "total cash costs: co-product", "all-in sustaining costs", "adjusted operating cash flow", "EBITDA", "adjusted EBITDA" and "adjusted net debt", that are not recognized measures under IFRS. This data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. For a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable financial information presented in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, see Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures in this MD&A. The Company believes that these generally accepted industry measures are realistic indicators of operating performance and are useful in performing year over year comparisons. However, these non-GAAP measures should be considered together with other data prepared in accordance with IFRS, and these measures,

GOLDCORP  |   2


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


taken by themselves, are not necessarily indicative of operating costs or cash flow measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. This MD&A also contains information as to estimated future all-in sustaining costs. The estimates of future all-in sustaining costs are not based on total production cash costs calculated in accordance with IFRS, which forms the basis of the Company’s cash costs: by-product. The estimates of future all-in sustaining costs are anticipated to be adjusted to include sustaining capital expenditures, corporate administrative expense, exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and amortization, and exclude the effects of expansionary capital, tax payments, dividends and financing costs. Projected IFRS total production cash costs for the full year would require inclusion of the projected impact of future included and excluded items, including items that are not currently determinable, but may be significant, such as sustaining capital expenditures, reclamation cost accretion and amortization and tax payments. Due to the uncertainty of the likelihood, amount and timing of any such items, the Company does not have information available to provide a quantitative reconciliation of projected all-in sustaining costs to a total production cash costs projection.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Scientific and technical information contained in this MD&A, including the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, was reviewed and approved by Ivan Mullany, FAusIMM, Senior-Vice President, Technical Services for Goldcorp, and a "qualified person" as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). All Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been estimated in accordance with the standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") and NI 43-101, or the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves equivalent. All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Information on data verification performed on the mineral properties mentioned in this MD&A that are considered to be material mineral properties to the Company are contained in Goldcorp’s most recent annual information form and the current technical report for each of those properties, all available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Cautionary Note to United States investors concerning estimates of measured, indicated and inferred resources : The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of United States securities laws and use terms that are not recognized by the SEC. Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by NI 43-101. The definitions used in NI 43-101 are incorporated by reference from the CIM Definition Standards adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014 (the "CIM Definition Standards"). U.S. reporting requirements are governed by the SEC Industry Guide 7 ("Industry Guide 7") under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported, but embody different approaches and definitions. For example, the terms "Mineral Reserve", "Proven Mineral Reserve" and "Probable Mineral Reserve" are Canadian mining terms as defined in in NI 43-101, and these definitions differ from the definitions in Industry Guide 7. Under Industry Guide 7 standards, a "final" or "bankable" feasibility study is required to report reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. Further, under Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.
While the terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101, these terms are not defined terms under Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. United States readers are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, "Inferred Mineral Resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and their economic and legal feasibility. A significant amount of exploration must be completed in order to determine whether an Inferred Mineral Resource may be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian regulations, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. United States readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of "contained ounces" in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations if such disclosure includes the grade or quality and the quantity for each category of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute "reserves" by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.
Accordingly, information contained in this MD&A containing descriptions of Goldcorp’s mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.


GOLDCORP  |   3


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018
Net earnings were $ 67 million , or $ 0.08 per share, compared to net earnings of $ 170 million , or $ 0.20 per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 . Operating cash flows and adjusted operating cash flows (1) for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were $271 million and $350 million , respectively, compared to $ 227 million and $315 million , respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2017.
Gold production of 590,000 ounces at all-in sustaining costs (1) ("AISC") of $810 per ounce, compared to 655,000 ounces at AISC of $800 per ounce for the three months ended March 31, 2017 Full year 2018 guidance reconfirmed for gold production of 2.5 million ounces (+/-5%) at AISC of $800 (2) per ounce (+/- 5%).
Solid execution on project pipeline in support of the Company's 20/20/20 growth plan. The Peñasquito Pyrite Leach project advanced to 86% completion, ahead of schedule, the Musselwhite Materials Handling project advanced to 65% completion, on schedule and 10% below budget, and the Borden project is on track for commercial production by the second half of 2019.

Key milestone achieved with the completion of pre-feasibility study at NuevaUnión and advancement to the feasibility stage. The pre-feasibility study outlines a combined and phased approach to the development of the Relincho and La Fortuna deposits at NuevaUnión with a project containing 8.9 million ounces of proven and probable gold mineral reserves and 17.9 billion pounds of proven and probable copper mineral reserves (100% basis) to be produced over a 36 year mine life. The NuevaUnión project is foundational to the Company's Beyond 20/20 program and its feasibility study is expected in 2019.
Program to implement $250 million of sustainable annual efficiencies by the middle of 2018 is on track with $210 million achieved as at the end of the first quarter of 2018 across the Company's portfolio.  More than 100% of the $250 million of efficiencies have been identified, with the program likely to be extended and the efficiency target increased, after the Company achieves its current target.





















(1)
The Company has included non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis throughout this document. Adjusted operating cash flows and AISC per ounce are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages 31 - 38 of this MD&A.
(2)
Refer to footnote (4) on page 15 of this MD&A regarding the Company's projection of AISC.

GOLDCORP  |   4


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Goldcorp is a leading gold producer focused on responsible mining practices, with production from a portfolio of long-life, high quality assets throughout the Americas that it believes position the Company to deliver long-term value.
The Company’s principal producing mining properties are comprised of the Éléonore, Musselwhite, Porcupine and Red Lake mines in Canada; the Peñasquito mine in Mexico; the Cerro Negro mine in Argentina; and the Pueblo Viejo mine (40.0% interest) in the Dominican Republic. The Company's significant projects include the Borden, Century and Coffee projects in Canada, and the NuevaUnión ( 50% interest) and Norte Abierto (50% interest) projects in Chile.
The Company’s current sources of operating cash flows are primarily from the sale of gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead. Goldcorp's principal product is refined gold bullion sold primarily in the London spot market. In addition to gold, the Company also produces silver, zinc, copper and lead primarily from concentrate produced at the Peñasquito mine, which is sold to third party smelters and refineries.
Goldcorp has an investment-grade credit rating, supported by a strong balance sheet, and remains 100% unhedged to gold sales, providing full exposure to gold prices.
STRATEGY
Goldcorp's vision is to create sustainable value for its stakeholders by growing net asset value ("NAV") per share to generate long-term shareholder value. With a portfolio of long-life, high quality assets that provide economies of scale, coupled with low AISC and underpinned by a strong balance sheet, Goldcorp has optimized its portfolio of assets and is reinvesting in a strong pipeline of organic opportunities to drive increasing margins and returns on investment.
In 2016, the Company outlined its 20/20/20 growth plan under which it expects to deliver a 20% increase in gold production, a 20% increase in gold reserves and a 20% reduction in AISC by 2021. In the first quarter of 2018, the Company introduced its Beyond 20/20 program which is focused on the potential for organic growth through the development of the Company's long-term portfolio, such as the Century project at the Porcupine camp, NuevaUnión and Norte Abierto.
Goldcorp is also committed to being a responsible steward of the environment and building collaborative partnerships with communities, governments and all other stakeholders for mutual success.
Goldcorp believes its strong balance sheet provides the Company with flexibility and the ability to manage the risk of gold and commodity price volatility. The Company's capital allocation strategy focuses on investing in its pipeline of organic growth opportunities, further debt reduction and returning capital to its shareholders by paying a sustainable dividend. Furthermore, Goldcorp leverages its exploration spending in the most efficient way possible through investments in junior mining companies.
CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS
Advanced Project Pipeline
The Company continued to execute on its project pipeline during the first quarter of 2018. At March 31, 2018, construction of Peñasquito's Pyrite Leach project ("PLP") was 86% complete and commissioning is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2018, three months ahead of schedule. At Musselwhite, the Materials Handling project was 65% complete at March 31, 2018, progressing on schedule and expected to be approximately 10% under budget. In addition, a significant milestone was reached on the NuevaUnión project during the first quarter of 2018 with the completion of a pre-feasibility study on the combined Relincho and La Fortuna deposits. The pre-feasibility study includes updated capital and operating cost estimates for the combined projects and reflects a phased development approach. Trade-off studies, including the evaluation of environmental, social and technological options, are ongoing. Lastly, at the Coffee project, the adequacy review process advanced as planned. In April 2018, the Company submitted additional information to the Yukon's Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board in response to their request which is part of the normal course review of the project at this stage. In addition, Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation ("TH"), whose Traditional Territory covers 100% of Coffee's project footprint, and Goldcorp are continuing to make progress towards finalizing a broad benefits agreement that will address the impacts of the Coffee project on TH’s Treaty Rights.  The negotiators for TH and Goldcorp have agreed in principle to the majority of the terms of the collaboration benefits agreement which remain subject to definitive documentation and final approval of both TH and Goldcorp.

Progress Towards Delivering $250 million of Sustainable Annual Efficiencies

The Company continues to make progress in executing its productivity and cost optimization programs with $210 million of sustainable annual efficiencies achieved as at the end of the first quarter of 2018 across the Company's portfolio.  Much of the additional improvement in 2018 will result from decreasing costs of goods and services throughout the supply chain.  In addition to these cost reductions, further productivity gains are expected at Hoyle underground as Porcupine progresses toward the goal of delivering ore at the rate of 1,300 tonnes per day.  In addition to improved blasting practices, further productivity gains are also expected at Musselwhite through the use of tele-remote mucking. 

GOLDCORP  |   5


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


At Éléonore, incremental improvements are expected to metal recoveries through 2018 and enhancements to Peñasquito’s process plant are also expected to yield improved recoveries.  The Company expects further productivity improvements at Cerro Negro and cost reductions at Red Lake to successfully extend the program beyond $250 million of annual sustainable efficiencies in the second half of 2018.
Advances in Innovation
In 2017, Goldcorp launched its innovation strategy with a series of projects to advance innovative technologies, covering every stage of the mining life cycle, aimed at increasing productivity, improving safety, operating in a more environmentally sustainable manner and ultimately increasing NAV.
During the first quarter of 2018, the Company advanced its innovation strategy with the completion of construction of a demonstration plant at Porcupine to evaluate the effectiveness of ore sorting technology (the "Waste to Ore" project). Assuming the technology is successful on a large scale, it will be incorporated into the trade-off studies being conducted for the Century project at Porcupine, along with testing its application at Goldcorp's other sites. Benefits of the Waste to Ore project include a smaller environmental footprint associated with reduced waste and reductions in emissions and energy consumption, which align with the Company's 20/20/20 plan and support Goldcorp's commitment to being a responsible steward of the environment.
Debt Refinancing
On March 14, 2018, the Company entered into three one-year non-revolving term loan agreements, totaling $400 million. The term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.65%, reset monthly, and are repayable before March 14, 2019 without penalty. The proceeds from the term loans were used to repay the $500 million 2.125% notes that were due on March 15, 2018.
Executive Appointment
As part of a planned succession, Patrick Merrin, formerly Vice President, Canada Operations, assumed the role of Senior Vice President, Canada Operations as of February 1, 2018. Mr. Merrin joined Goldcorp in September 2017. Prior to joining Goldcorp, he held various executive and management positions in the mining industry, having most recently served as Vice President of the Arizona Business unit with Hudbay Minerals Inc. Mr. Merrin holds a Bachelor in Chemical Engineering from McGill University and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Toronto and has been a member of the Professional Engineers of Ontario since 1997.


MARKET OVERVIEW
Gold
The market price of gold is the primary driver of Goldcorp's profitability. The price of gold can fluctuate widely and is affected by a number of macroeconomic factors, including the sale or purchase of gold by central banks and financial institutions, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, global and regional supply and demand and the political and economic conditions of major gold-producing and gold-consuming countries throughout the world.
Q12018GOLDPRICE.JPG
The price of gold started 2018 at $1,303 per ounce and rallied throughout January to a high of $1,366 per ounce before settling into a broad trading range between these two levels. The price of gold closed the first quarter of 2018 at $1,326 per ounce, a gain of approximately 2% for the quarter. On an attributable basis, the Company realized an average gold price of $ 1,337 per ounce in the first quarter of 2018, an 8% increase compared to $ 1,236 per ounce in the first quarter of 2017, and a 4% increase compared to $ 1,286 per ounce in the fourth quarter of

GOLDCORP  |   6


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


2017. During the first quarter of 2018 there was a change in leadership at the U.S. Federal Reserve with Jerome Powell assuming the role of Chairman from Janet Yellen. Despite the change in leadership, the Federal Reserve continued its recent policy of gradual interest rate hikes at its March 2018 meeting, and market expectations are for further increases throughout 2018 which should continue to influence sentiment and gold price performance.
Currency Markets
The results of Goldcorp's mining operations are affected by changes in the US dollar exchange rate compared to currencies of the countries in which Goldcorp has foreign operations. The Company has exposure to the Canadian dollar relating to its Éléonore, Musselwhite, Porcupine and Red Lake operations and the Coffee and Century projects, exposure to the Mexican peso relating to its Peñasquito operation, exposure to the Argentine peso at its Cerro Negro operation, exposure to the Dominican Republic peso relating to its investment in Pueblo Viejo and exposure to the Chilean peso with respect to its NuevaUnión and Norte Abierto joint ventures.
Fluctuations in the US dollar can cause volatility of costs reported in US dollars. In addition, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in non-US dollar currencies, such as cash and cash equivalents and value-added taxes, are subject to currency risk. Goldcorp is further exposed to currency risk through non-monetary assets and liabilities of entities whose taxable profit or tax loss are denominated in non-US dollar currencies. Changes in exchange rates give rise to temporary differences resulting in deferred tax assets and liabilities with the resulting deferred tax charged or credited to income tax expense.
Goldcorp's financial risk management policy allows the hedging of foreign exchange exposure to reduce the risk associated with currency fluctuations. The Company enters into Mexican peso currency hedge contracts to purchase Mexican pesos at pre-determined US dollar amounts. These contracts are entered into to normalize operating expenses and capital expenditures at Peñasquito, expressed in US dollar terms.
Currency markets exhibited volatility during the first quarter of 2018 largely due to the instability of the US dollar influenced by the Federal Reserve Bank interest rate hike as well as other US economic policy decisions. The Canadian dollar depreciated since the end of February 2018 despite strong economic data, driven by the uncertainty over the NAFTA negotiations and interest rate expectations. On the other hand, the Mexican peso strengthened by 7%, ending the first quarter at 18.33. The probability of a US withdrawal from NAFTA has lessened as the United States is showing some flexibility on key issues, which is a positive development ahead of the Presidential Election in Mexico in July 2018.

Q12018CADUSDFX.JPG Q12018MXPUSDFX.JPG

The Argentine peso remained under pressure during the first quarter of 2018 as the Central Bank of Argentina struggles to meet the 15% inflation target in 2018, which led to the Central Bank Monetary Policy Committee ("MPC") maintaining the interest rate at 27.25%. The worst drought in decades is expected to negatively impact agricultural exports in 2018, putting further pressure on the currency in 2018. However, the MPC is preserving its hawkish guidance notwithstanding some inflationary headwinds from what it believes are transitory factors such as foreign exchange pass-through from the recent depreciation in the Argentine peso and significant adjustments in regulated tariffs. The MPC is somewhat optimistic that once these transitory factors pass that the path towards disinflation will return due to the restrictive policy stance and the expectation that the cycle of large increases in regulated prices will end in April 2018. In addition, the MPC believes that the Argentine peso is unlikely to depreciate significantly going forward given the actions of the Central Bank and the already high level of the real exchange rate following the large depreciation of the Argentine peso between December 2017 and February 2018.

GOLDCORP  |   7


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Q12018ARSUSDFX.JPG

Foreign Exchange Rate Sources:
(a)
Canadian Dollar/USD: Bank of Canada Noon rate (January 1, 2017 - April 28, 2017), Bank of Canada Daily Average (April 29, 2017 - March 31, 2018)
(b)
Mexican Peso/USD: Central Bank of Mexico Current Day Fixing
(c)
Argentine Peso/USD: Central Bank of Argentina Current Day Fixing

GOLDCORP  |   8


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)



OVERVIEW OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RESULTS
 
March 31
December 31
September 30
June 30
 
2018

2017

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Financial Results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
846

$
882

$
853

$
898

$
866

$
915

$
822

$
753

Net earnings (loss)
$
67

$
170

$
242

$
101

$
111

$
59

$
135

$
(78
)
Net earnings (loss) per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 – Basic and diluted
$
0.08

$
0.20

$
0.28

$
0.12

$
0.13

$
0.07

$
0.16

$
(0.09
)
Operating cash flow
$
271

$
227

$
511

$
239

$
315

$
267

$
158

$
234

Adjusted operating cash flow (1)
$
350

$
315

$
401

$
306

$
308

$
401

$
320

$
204

Adjusted EBITDA (1)
$
433

$
427

$
448

$
477

$
400

$
491

$
432

$
269

Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
287

$
186

$
420

$
217

$
291

$
168

$
233

$
177

– Sustaining
$
119

$
113

$
187

$
145

$
143

$
112

$
133

$
140

– Expansionary
$
168

$
73

$
233

$
72

$
148

$
56

$
100

$
37

Dividends paid
$
14

$
15

$
16

$
16

$
15

$
14

$
16

$
16

Operating Results (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold produced (thousands of ounces)
590

655

646

761

633

715

635

613

Gold sold (thousands of ounces)  
585

646

633

768

606

686

649

616

Silver produced (thousands of ounces)
6,800

7,100

7,100

7,400

7,000

7,700

7,400

5,300

Copper produced (thousands of pounds)
5,400

9,700

4,500

20,400

6,300

16,900

7,900

14,400

Lead produced (thousands of pounds)
27,000

32,400

36,500

29,600

38,300

33,700

26,100

17,100

Zinc produced (thousands of pounds)
88,700

80,700

96,500

78,300

98,400

75,200

84,100

38,300

Average realized gold price (per ounce)
$
1,337

$
1,236

$
1,286

$
1,181

$
1,287

$
1,333

$
1,256

$
1,277

Cash costs: by-product (per ounce) (2)
$
511

$
540

$
462

$
481

$
483

$
554

$
510

$
728

Cash costs: co-product (per ounce) (3)
$
696

$
701

$
627

$
619

$
663

$
657

$
644

$
716

All-in sustaining costs (per ounce)
$
810

$
800

$
870

$
747

$
827

$
812

$
800

$
1,067

(1)
The Company has presented the non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis in the table above. Adjusted operating cash flows, Adjusted EBITDA and AISC are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages 31 - 38 of this report.
(2)
Total cash costs: by-product, per ounce, is calculated net of Goldcorp’s share of by-product sales revenues (by-product silver sales revenues for Cerro Negro, Marlin and Pueblo Viejo; by-product lead, zinc and copper sales revenues and 75% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at market silver prices, and 25% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at $4.17 per silver ounce (2017 – $4.13 per silver ounce) sold to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. ("Wheaton") and by-product copper sales revenues for Alumbrera).
(3)
Total cash costs: co-product, per ounce, is calculated by allocating Goldcorp’s share of production costs to each co-product (Alumbrera (copper); Marlin (silver); Pueblo Viejo (silver and copper); Peñasquito (silver, lead and zinc)) based on the ratio of actual sales volumes multiplied by budget metal prices (see page 32 ).



GOLDCORP  |   9


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


REVIEW OF FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL RESULTS
Three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017
Net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were $ 67 million , or $ 0.08 per share, compared to net earnings of $170 million , or $0.20 per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease in net earnings in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily due to a decrease in net earnings relating to the Company's associates and joint venture and an increase in the Company's income tax expense compared to the same period in 2017 partially offset by the impact of increases in average realized gold and zinc prices.

Net earnings and earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were affected by, among other things, the following non-cash or other items that management believes are not reflective of the performance of the underlying operations (items are denoted as having (increased)/decreased net earnings and net earnings per share in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017):
 
Three months ended March 31, 2018
Three months ended March 31, 2017
(in millions, except per share)
Pre-tax
After-tax

Per share
($/share)

Pre-tax
After-tax
Per share
($/share)
Reduction in Goldcorp's share of Pueblo Viejo's earnings relating to settlement of a Dominican Republic tax audit
$
17

$
17

$
0.02

$

$

$

Non-cash foreign exchange gain on deferred tax balances
$

$
(16
)
$
(0.02
)
$

$
(61
)
$
(0.07
)
Gain from reduction in provision for Alumbrera's reclamation costs
$

$

$

$
(26
)
$
(26
)
$
(0.03
)


Revenues
Three months ended March 31
2018 (1)
2017 (1)
Change
Gold
 
 
 
 
Revenue (millions)
$
620

$
664

(7
)%
 
Ounces sold (thousands)
466

539

(14
)%
 
Average realized price ($/ounce)
$
1,334

$
1,236

8
 %
Silver
 
 
 
 
Revenue (millions)
$
81

$
100

(19
)%
 
Ounces sold (thousands)
6,003

6,769

(11
)%
 
Average realized price ($/ounce)
$
14.21

$
15.47

(8
)%
Zinc
 
 
 
 
Revenue (millions)
$
121

$
93

30
 %
 
Pounds sold (thousands)
88,000

88,500

(1
)%
 
Average realized price
$
1.51

$
1.32

14
 %
Other metals
 
 
 
 
Revenue (millions)
$
24

$
25

(4
)%
Total revenue (millions)
$
846

$
882

(4
)%
(1)
Excludes attributable share of revenues from the Company's associates. Revenues are shown net of applicable treatment and refining charges.
Revenues decreased by $ 36 million , or 4% , primarily due to decreases in gold and silver sales volumes of 14% and 11%, respectively, and an 8% decrease in the average realized price of silver. These decreases were offset partially by a 30% increase in zinc revenues, driven by a 14% increase in the average realized price and lower treatment and refining charges, and an 8% increase in the average realized price of gold. The decrease in gold sales volumes was primarily due to the impacts of the sale of Los Filos in April 2017 and closure of Marlin in the second quarter of 2017. In addition, gold sales volumes were lower at Peñasquito due to lower grade ore as a result of the planned transition from the higher grade area of Phase 5 at the bottom of the Peñasco pit to primarily lower grade ore from the beginning of Phase 6 and lower grade stockpiles. These decreases in gold sales volume were partially offset by an increase in sales volumes at Cerro Negro, primarily due to higher grade as a result of mine sequencing. The decrease in silver sales volumes was primarily due to the closure of Marlin in 2017.

GOLDCORP  |   10


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)



A2018Q1REVENUESQTDWATERFALL.JPG
Production Costs
Production costs in the first quarter of 2018 decreased by $ 56 million , or 11% , when compared to the same period in 2017 primarily due to the divestiture of Los Filos in April 2017 ($39 million) and the closure of Marlin in the second quarter of 2017 ($35 million), partially offset by an increase in production costs at Cerro Negro due primarily to an increase royalties and production taxes due to higher sales, and higher employee costs.
Depreciation and Depletion
Three months ended March 31
2018 (1)
2017 (1)
Change
Depreciation and depletion (millions)
$
251

$
246

2
 %
Sales ounces (thousands)
466

539

(14
)%
Depreciation and depletion per ounce
$
539

$
456

18
 %
(1)
Excludes attributable share of depreciation and depletion from the Company's associates.
Depreciation and depletion increased by $ 5 million , or 2% , mainly due to a higher depletable cost base at Peñasquito in 2018 and higher sales volumes at Cerro Negro, offset partially by the impacts of the sale of Los Filos in April 2017 and closure of Marlin in the second quarter of 2017.
Share of Net Earnings Related to Associates and Joint Venture
Three months ended March 31
2018
2017
Change
Pueblo Viejo
$
9

$
27

(67
)%
Alumbrera

33

(100
)%
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
$
9

$
60

(85
)%
The Company’s share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture decreased by $51 million in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 primarily due to a $33 million reduction in the Company's provision to fund its share of Alumbrera’s reclamation costs in the first quarter of 2017, and a decrease in net earnings from Pueblo Viejo. The decrease in net earnings from Pueblo Viejo was due to an increase in tax expense of $17 million arising from the settlement of a Dominican Republic tax audit, higher depreciation and depletion relating to the impact of the reversal of impairment recognized at December 31, 2017, and higher production costs related to higher power and planned maintenance costs.
Impairment reversal
The Company recorded a net impairment reversal of $3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2017. The net impairment reversal was comprised of a reversal of impairment at Cerro Blanco of $19 million, which was based on the expected proceeds from the sale to Bluestone being greater than the carrying value of the asset, partially offset by an impairment expense at Los Filos of $16 million, based on changes to the assessed fair value of the Los Filos assets that were subsequently sold to Leagold.

GOLDCORP  |   11


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Corporate Administration
Corporate administration expenses increased by $ 5 million in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the first quarter of 2017, primarily due to a reduction in employee costs in the first quarter of 2017 relating to the impact of a lower bonus payout than accrued in the prior year and higher consulting expenses in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year associated with strategic sourcing and procurement services. The Company partnered with a vendor and is in the process of centralizing these services for all its mine sites and corporate offices as part of its program to realize $250 million in annual sustainable efficiencies. The cost of these services is expected to be more than offset by savings in operating expenses and other corporate expenditures.
Income Tax Expense
The income tax expense of $ 4 million for three months ended March 31, 2018 resulted in a 6% tax rate ( three months ended March 31, 2017 - $48 million income tax recovery and a negative 39% tax rate) and was impacted primarily by currency translations.
Currency translation
The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances and intra-group financing arrangements resulted in a $16 million income tax recovery for the three months ended March 31, 2018 ( three months ended March 31, 2017 - $61 million income tax recovery).
The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on current tax balances resulted in a $4 million income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 ( three months ended March 31, 2017 - $4 million income tax recovery).
Effective tax rate
Earnings before income taxes of $ 71 million for three months ended March 31, 2018 was impacted by the following items: $7 million of non-deductible share-based compensation expense ( three months ended March 31, 2017 - $9 million); nil non-deductible reversals of impairment ( three months ended March 31, 2017 - $3 million reversal of impairment); and $9 million of after-tax income from associates (particularly Pueblo Viejo) that are not subject to further income tax in the accounts of the Company ( three months ended March 31, 2017 - $60 million).
After adjusting for the above mentioned items, the effective income tax rate for three months ended March 31, 2018 was 25% ( three months ended March 31, 2017 - 25%).
AISC
AISC (1) were $ 810 per ounce for the three months ended March 31, 2018 , compared to $ 800 per ounce for the three months ended March 31, 2017 . The increase in AISC was due primarily to lower gold sales ($84 per ounce), lower by-product credits ($39 per ounce), and higher sustaining capital ($14 per ounce), partially offset by lower production costs ($126 per ounce). The decrease in gold sales was primarily due to lower sales at Peñasquito due to mine sequencing, and the impacts of the sale of Los Filos and closure of Marlin in the first half of 2017, partially offset by an increase in gold sales at Cerro Negro due to higher gold grade. The decrease in production costs was primarily due to the sale of Los Filos and closure of Marlin in 2017. The increase in sustaining capital was primarily due to higher capitalized stripping tonnes driven by the start of Moore phase 6 and higher spend on tailings facilities construction at Pueblo Viejo, and costs associated with increased development and an expansion of the tailings area at Cerro Negro. The decrease in by-product credits was primarily due to lower by-product production for all metals, which were impacted partially by the closure of Marlin in 2017, partially offset by 14% increase in the average realized price of zinc.
A2018Q1AISCQTDWATERFALLA02.JPG
(1)
AISC per ounce is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages 31 - 38 of this report.

GOLDCORP  |   12


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


FINANCIAL POSITION AND LIQUIDITY
The following table summarizes Goldcorp's cash flow activity:
 
Three Months Ended March 31
 
2018

2017

Cash flow
 
 
From continuing operations provided by operating activities
$
271

$
227

From continuing operations used in investing activities
(268
)
(247
)
From continuing operations used in financing activities
(66
)
54

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(63
)
34

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
186

157

Increase in cash and cash equivalents reclassified as held for sale

(22
)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
123

$
169

Cash flow provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due an increase in earnings from mine operations driven by an 8% increase in realized gold prices and a 14% increase in realized zinc prices. In addition, during the first quarter of 2018, cash provided by operating activities increased by $28 million as compared to the same period in 2017 due to positive changes in non-cash working capital and other operating activities.
The increase in cash flow used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 was due mainly to an $87 million increase in expenditures on mining interests and an $18 million reduction in funds received from Pueblo Viejo as return of capital, partially offset by a decrease of $28 million in purchases of equity securities as compared to the same period in 2017. Cash flows used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 also included the purchase of the gold stream on the El Morro deposit, part of the Company's NuevaUnión joint venture, from New Gold Inc. for $65 million.
Expenditures on mining interests (including deposits on mining interest expenditures) were as follows:
 
Three Months Ended March 31
 
2018

2017

Éléonore
$
17

$
29

Musselwhite
24

11

Porcupine
28

14

Red Lake
21

17

Peñasquito
129

73

Cerro Negro
19

16

Other
29

20

Total
$
267

$
180

The increase in expenditures on mining interests during the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 was due primarily to an increase in expansionary capital of $95 million related to the construction of the PLP at Peñasquito, the Waste to Ore project at Porcupine, construction activities at the Borden and Century projects, as well as the Materials Handling project at Musselwhite.
Cash flow used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased by $120 million as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase compared to 2017 was primarily due to net debt and credit facility repayments of $50 million in the first quarter of 2018 as compared to a net credit facility draw down of $70 million in the same period in 2017.
On March 14, 2018, the Company entered into three one-year non-revolving term loan agreements, totaling $400 million. The term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.65%, reset monthly, and are repayable before March 14, 2019 without penalty. The proceeds from the term loans were used to repay the $500 million note that was due on March 15, 2018.
At March 31, 2018 , the Company's net debt and adjusted net debt (1) was $ 2.3 billion and $ 2.1 billion , respectively. At March 31, 2018 , excluding cash and cash equivalents held at associates of $186 million , the Company had $3.1 billion of available liquidity, comprised of $0.2 billion of cash and cash equivalents and short term investments, and $2.95 billion available on its $3.0 billion credit facility.

GOLDCORP  |   13


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


The Company may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase its outstanding debt in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise.  Such repurchases, if any, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, the Company's liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.  The amount of debt retired or repurchased may be material.
(1)
The Company has presented the non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis. Adjusted net debt is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information, please see pages 31 - 38 of this report.
Outstanding Share Data
As at April 25, 2018 , there were 869 million common shares of the Company issued and outstanding and 6 million stock options outstanding, which are exercisable into common shares at exercise prices ranging between C$20.27 per share to C$30.41 per share, and 3 million restricted share units outstanding.
GUIDANCE (1)  
Goldcorp expects to produce 2.5 million ounces (+/- 5%) of gold in 2018, consistent with previous 2018 guidance. AISC are expected to be $800 per ounce (+/- 5%) in the same period.
The Company’s 20/20/20 plan remains unchanged. As previously guided, gold production is expected to increase 20% to 3.0 million ounces by 2021 compared to baseline production of 2.5 million ounces in 2017. AISC are expected to decrease by 20% to approximately $700 per ounce over the same period driven by the ongoing focus on cost efficiencies and productivity improvements. Gold mineral reserves are expected to increase by 20% to 60 million ounces by 2021 supported by the exploration potential and ongoing programs across the Company's operating assets, joint ventures and projects.
Complete production and cost guidance to 2021 is provided below.
Production (+/- 5%) (2)
Units
2018E
2019E
2020E
2021E
Gold Production
Moz
2.5
2.7
3.0
3.0
Silver Production
Moz
30
50
40
35
Zinc Production
Mlbs
300
425
450
400
Lead Production
Mlbs
160
300
250
150

Costs (+/- 5%) (2, 3)
Units
2018E
2019E
2020E
2021E
AISC (4)
$/oz
800
750
700
700
By-product Cash Costs
$/oz
450
400
400
400

Capital Expenditures (+/- 5%)
Units
2018E
2019E
2020E
2021E
Sustaining Capital (2, 5)
$M
550
575
575
575
Expansionary Capital (2, 5)
$M
750
250
300
300

Other 2018 Estimates
2018E
Corporate Administration ($M) (including non-cash stock compensation of $40M)
$140
Exploration ($M) (2, 6)
$125
Depreciation and depletion ($/oz) (2)
$485
Tax rate (2)
40 - 45%

(1)
Guidance projections (“Guidance”) are considered “forward-looking statements” and represent management’s good faith estimates or expectations of future production results as of the date hereof. Guidance is based upon certain assumptions, including, but not limited to, metal prices, fuel prices, certain exchange rates and other assumptions. Such assumptions may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Consequently, Guidance cannot be guaranteed. As such, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon Guidance and forward-looking statements as there can be no assurance that the plans, assumptions or expectations upon which they are placed will occur. See the "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".
(2)
The Company has presented the non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable (or Goldcorp's share) basis. AISC per ounce and cash costs: by-product are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information, please see pages 31 - 38 of this report.

GOLDCORP  |   14


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


(3)
The assumptions below were used to forecast total cash costs:
 
2018 - 2019
2020 - 2021
Gold (oz)
$1,300
$1,300
Silver (oz)
$19.00
$18.00
Copper (lb)
$2.75
$3.00
Zinc (lb)
$1.30
$1.15
Lead (lb)
$1.10
$1.00
Foreign exchange (respectively to the US$)
 
 
  Canadian dollar
$1.25
$1.25
  Mexican peso
19.00
19.00
(4)
The Company’s projected AISC are not based on GAAP total production cash costs, which forms the basis of the Company’s cash costs: by-product. The projected range of AISC is anticipated to be adjusted to include sustaining capital expenditures, corporate administrative expense, mine-site exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and amortization, and exclude the effects of expansionary capital and non-sustaining expenditures. Projected GAAP total production cash costs for the full year would require inclusion of the projected impact of future included and excluded items, including items that are not currently determinable, but may be significant, such as sustaining capital expenditures, reclamation cost accretion and amortization. Due to the uncertainty of the likelihood, amount and timing of any such items, the Company does not have information available to provide a quantitative reconciliation of projected AISC to a total production cash costs projection.
(5)
Excludes capitalized exploration costs (see footnote 6). Expansionary capital includes capital costs for those projects which are in execution and/or have an approved feasibility study. Projects without an approved feasibility study only include capital costs to the next stage gate.
(6)
Approximately 40% of exploration spending is expected to be expensed and approximately 60% is expected to be capitalized. Approximately 50% of exploration spending considered sustaining and approximately 50% is considered expansionary.


GOLDCORP  |   15


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


OPERATIONAL REVIEW
The Company’s principal producing mining properties are comprised of the Éléonore, Musselwhite, Porcupine and Red Lake mines in Canada; the Peñasquito mine in Mexico; the Cerro Negro mine in Argentina; and the Pueblo Viejo mine (40.0% interest) in the Dominican Republic.
Operating results of operating segments are reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker ("CODM") to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance. The Company considers each individual operating mine as an operating segment for financial reporting purposes except for Alumbrera and Leagold. Alumbrera and Leagold are not considered to be reportable operating segments as their financial results do not meet the quantitative threshold required for segment disclosure purposes. As a result, Alumbrera and Leagold are included in Other.
The Company’s 100% interest in the HG Young project is included in the Red Lake reporting operating segment while the Borden and Century projects are included in the Porcupine reportable operating segments. The Company's 50% interests in the NuevaUnión and Norte Abierto projects in Chile, and 100% interest in the Coffee project in the Yukon, are included in Other.
The Company’s principal product is gold bullion which is sold primarily in the London spot market. Concentrate produced at Peñasquito and Alumbrera, containing both gold and by-product metals, is sold to third party smelters and traders.

Segmented Financial and Operating Highlights
Three months ended
March 31
 
Revenue
($ millions)

Gold
produced
(000's of ounces)

         Gold
sold
(000's of ounces)

Total cash
costs: by-product
($/oz)  (1), (4)

AISC
($/oz)  (3), (4)                                                   

Earnings (loss) from mine operations  ($ millions)

Peñasquito
2018
329

98

90

(315
)
132

68

 
2017
356

137

138

85

391

91

Cerro Negro
2018
177

118

120

451

600

34

 
2017
121

95

88

459

651

15

Pueblo Viejo (4)
2018
139

94

97

423

591

64

 
2017
122

95

95

439

541

66

Red Lake
2018
81

60

61

902

1,139

5

 
2017
66

49

54

861

1,149

(2
)
Éléonore
2018
86

67

65

1,051

1,204

(15
)
 
2017
88

78

72

850

1,057

(5
)
Porcupine
2018
93

68

70

708

896

15

 
2017
76

61

62

843

1,011

(4
)
Musselwhite
2018
80

59

60

617

766

32

 
2017
69

54

56

713

871

19

Other mines (2)
2018
42

26

22

1,046

1,175

4

 
2017
146

86

81

691

773

17

Other (3)
2018




87

(9
)
 
2017




66

(7
)
Attributable segment total (4)
2018
1,027

590

585

511

810

198

 
2017
1,044

655

646

540

800

190

Less associates and joint venture
2018
(181
)
(120
)
(119
)
(536
)
(697
)
(67
)
 
2017
(162
)
(113
)
(107
)
(436
)
(551
)
(74
)
Total - Consolidated
2018
846

470

466

505

839

131

 
2017
882

542

539

561

849

116

(1)
Total cash costs: by-product, per ounce, is calculated net of Goldcorp’s share of by-product sales revenues (by-product copper sales revenues for Alumbrera; by-product silver sales revenues for Marlin and Pueblo Viejo; and by-product lead and zinc sales revenues and 75% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at market silver prices, and 25% of silver sales revenues for Peñasquito at $4.17 per silver ounce (2017 – $4.13 per silver ounce) sold to Wheaton). If silver, copper, lead and zinc were treated as co-products, total cash costs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 would have been $ 696 per ounce of gold ( three months ended March 31, 2017 – $ 701 ). Production costs are allocated to each co-product based on the ratio of actual sales volumes multiplied by budget metal prices (see page 32 ).

GOLDCORP  |   16


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


(2)
As described above, the Company's investments in Alumbrera and Leagold are included in 'Other' for segment reporting purposes. They have been disclosed separately in these tables, in 'Other mines', along with Los Filos up to the date of its disposal on April 7, 2017 and Marlin up to the date of its closure in the second quarter of 2017, to provide visibility into the impact of the Company's corporate administration expense on AISC.
(3)
For the purpose of calculating AISC, the Company included corporate administration expense, capital expenditures incurred at the Company's regional and head corporate offices and regional office exploration expense as corporate AISC in the "Other" category. These costs are not allocated to the individual mine sites as the Company measures its operations' performance on AISC directly incurred at the mine site. AISC for Other was calculated using total corporate expenditures and the Company's total attributable gold sales ounces.
(4)
The Company has included certain non-GAAP performance measures including the Company’s share of the applicable production, sales and financial information of Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión throughout this document. Total cash costs: by-product and AISC are non-GAAP performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. For further information and detailed reconciliations, please see pages 31 - 38 of this report.



GOLDCORP  |   17


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


OPERATIONAL REVIEW
Peñasquito, Mexico (100%-owned)
 
Three months ended March 31
Operating Data
2018

2017

Change

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
8,959

9,510

(6
)%
Mill head grade
 
 
 
Gold grade (grams/tonne)
0.54

0.75

(28
)%
Silver grade (grams/tonne)
23.52

21.19

11
 %
Lead grade
0.19
%
0.22
%
(14
)%
Zinc grade
0.64
%
0.58
%
10
 %
Mill Recovery Rate
 
 
 
Gold recovery
67
%
66
%
2
 %
Silver recovery
85
%
82
%
4
 %
Lead recovery
76
%
76
%
 %
Zinc recovery
84
%
80
%
5
 %
Payable Metal Produced
 
 


Gold (thousands of ounces)
98

137

(28
)%
Silver (thousands of ounces)
5,166

4,836

7
 %
Lead (thousands of pounds)
27,000

32,400

(17
)%
Zinc (thousands of pounds)
88,700

80,700

10
 %
Payable Metal Sold
 
 
 
Gold (thousands of ounces)
90

138

(35
)%
Silver (thousands of ounces)
4,943

4,825

2
 %
Lead (thousands of pounds)
26,000

31,300

(17
)%
Zinc (thousands of pounds)
88,000

88,500

(1
)%
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
$
(315
)
$
85

(471
)%
Total Cash Costs: Co-product (per ounce)
$
708

$
668

6
 %
AISC (per ounce)
$
132

$
391

(66
)%
Financial Data (in millions)
 

 
Revenues (1)
$
329

$
356

(8
)%
Production costs
$
181

$
193

(6
)%
Depreciation and depletion
$
80

$
72

11
 %
Earnings from mine operations
$
68

$
91

(25
)%
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
131

$
75

75
 %
– Sustaining
$
36

$
40

(10
)%
– Expansionary
$
95

$
35

171
 %
(1)
Includes 25% of silver ounces sold to Wheaton at $4.17 per ounce (2017 – $4.13 ounce). The remaining 75% of silver ounces are sold at market rates.


GOLDCORP  |   18


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


First Quarter Operating and Financial Highlights
Gold production for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was lower than the same period in the prior year as a result of the planned transition from the higher grade area of Phase 5 at the bottom of the Peñasco pit to lower grade ore from the beginning of Phase 6 and lower grade stockpiles and 10 days of planned mill downtime for maintenance. Production is planned to revert back to higher grade ore in late 2019 when the Phase 6 stripping program exposes higher grade ore in the Peñasco pit.
Tonnes processed for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were lower than the same period in the prior year due to 10 days of planned shut downs during the month of February for mill relines and completing all tie-ins for the PLP, which reduced the number of operating days for the mill. Subsequent to the shutdown, new records were established for throughput at the primary crusher and concentrator driven by the continued implementation of a management operating system which resulted in more consistent ore delivery to the primary crusher. Ongoing mill improvement projects resulted in higher mill recoveries, despite processing some lower grade material.
Earnings from mine operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were lower than the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower gold sales, and higher depreciation and depletion, partially offset by higher zinc revenue due to 14% higher zinc prices, and a higher gold price. Production costs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 decreased when compared with the same period in the prior year due to continuing cost optimization efforts, despite the impact of market price increases for diesel and electricity, and offset by an increase in depreciation and depletion due to a higher depletable cost base in 2018.
AISC for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were lower than the same period in the prior year due to higher by-product metal credits and lower production costs, partially offset by lower gold production.
Expansionary capital of $95 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 included $47 million and $48 million relating to the PLP and Chile Colorado pre-stripping, respectively (see the Project Pipeline section below).


GOLDCORP  |   19


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Cerro Negro, Argentina (100%-owned)
 
Three months ended March 31
Operating Data
2018

2017

Change

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
243

239

2
 %
Mill Gold grade (grams/tonne)
14.33

12.61

14
 %
Mill Silver grade (grams/tonne)
141.3

106.5

33
 %
Gold recovery rate
96
%
96
%
 %
Silver recovery rate
87
%
89
%
(2
)%
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
118

95

24
 %
Silver Produced (thousands of ounces)
1,070

706

52
 %
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
120

88

36
 %
Silver Sold (thousands of ounces)
1,060

675

57
 %
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
$
451

$
459

(2
)%
Total Cash Costs: Co-product (per ounce)
$
524

$
529

(1
)%
AISC (per ounce)
$
600

$
651

(8
)%
Financial Data (in millions)
 
  
 
Revenues
$
177

$
121

46
 %
Production costs
$
72

$
52

38
 %
Depreciation and depletion
$
71

$
54

31
 %
Earnings from mine operations
$
34

$
15

127
 %
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
19

$
16

19
 %
– Sustaining
$
17

$
14

21
 %
– Expansionary
$
2

$
2

 %

First Quarter Operating and Financial Highlights
Gold production for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was higher than the same period in the prior year due primarily to higher grade. Grade was higher due to mine sequencing.
Mariana Norte design and development work continues according to plan, with ore production expected during the second half of 2018. The development of the Emilia vein will continue through 2018. These new veins will supplement declining production from Eureka in 2019. The mine expects to achieve 4,000 tonnes per day to the mill by the fourth quarter of 2018.
Earnings from mine operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year due to higher gold sales and a higher realized gold price, partially offset by higher production costs and depreciation and depletion due to higher gold production. Production costs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year due to higher royalties and production taxes due to higher sales, and higher employee costs.
AISC for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were lower than the same period in the prior year due to higher gold production, partially offset by planned higher sustaining capital related to increased underground development and tailings area expansion.



GOLDCORP  |   20


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Pueblo Viejo, Dominican Republic (40%-owned)

(tabular amounts below represent Goldcorp's proportionate 40% share)
 
Three months ended March 31
Operating Data
2018

2017

Change

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
858

730

18
 %
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
3.75

4.50

(17
)%
Recovery rate
92
%
90
%
2
 %
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
94

95

(1
)%
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
97

95

2
 %
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
$
423

$
439

(4
)%
Total Cash Costs: Co-product (per ounce)  
$
482

$
464

4
 %
AISC (per ounce)
$
591

$
541

9
 %
Financial Data (in millions) (1)
 
 
 
Revenues
$
139

$
122

14
 %
Production costs
$
51

$
47

9
 %
Depreciation and depletion
$
24

$
9

167
 %
Earnings from mine operations
$
64

$
66

(3
)%
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
15

$
9

67
 %
– Sustaining
$
15

$
9

67
 %
– Expansionary
$

$

n/a

(1)
The Company’s 40% interest in Pueblo Viejo is classified as an investment in associate and is accounted for using the equity method with the Company’s share of net earnings and net assets separately disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. The financial data disclosed in the table represents the financial data of Pueblo Viejo on a proportionate rather than equity basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company's equity earnings from Pueblo Viejo were $ 9 million ( three months ended March 31, 2017 – equity earnings of $27 million).

First Quarter Operating and Financial Highlights
Gold production for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was in line with the same period in the prior year as lower grades were offset by higher tonnage processed and higher recovery rates. The decrease in head grade was attributable to the mining sequence, with higher grade planned in the second half of 2018. Tonnes milled increased for the three months ended March 31, 2018 , compared with the three months ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to the deferral of autoclave shutdowns to the second quarter of 2018. Higher gold recovery resulted from improvements in carbon management, cyanide addition and regeneration kiln control.
Earnings from mine operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were lower than the same period in the prior year primarily due to higher production costs and higher depreciation and depletion costs as a result of the reversal of a previously recorded impairment at the end of 2017, partially offset by higher gold revenues. Production costs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year primarily due to the impact of higher power costs and additional planned maintenance costs.
AISC for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year primarily due to higher production costs, higher sustaining capital expenditures which resulted from higher capitalized stripping tonnes driven by the start of Moore phases 5 and 6, and by higher spend on tailings facilities construction, partially offset by higher gold sales.


GOLDCORP  |   21


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Red Lake, Canada (100%-owned)
 
Three months ended March 31
Operating Data
2018

2017

Change

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
160

111

44
 %
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
10.99

14.29

(23
)%
Recovery rate
95
%
95
%
 %
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
60

49

22
 %
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
61

54

13
 %
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
$
902

$
861

5
 %
AISC (per ounce)
$
1,139

$
1,149

(1
)%
Financial Data (in millions)
 
 
 
Revenues
$
81

$
66

23
 %
Production costs
$
55

$
47

17
 %
Depreciation and depletion
$
21

$
21

 %
Earnings (loss) from mine operations
$
5

$
(2
)
n/a

Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
21

$
17

24
 %
– Sustaining
$
13

$
14

(7
)%
– Expansionary
$
8

$
3

167
 %

First Quarter Operating and Financial Highlights
Gold production for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was higher than the same period in the prior year due to higher tonnes, partially offset by planned lower grades. With the increased use of bulk mining methods, the milling rate increased 45% in the first quarter of 2018 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The investments to optimize the long term value of the Red Lake camp and a review of the mining cost structure to transition to a higher tonnage, lower grade operation with lower costs will continue throughout 2018. Red Lake's 2018 mine plan is expected to continue to deliver similar tonnage as the first quarter of 2018, at a higher grade, as well as executing certain cost reduction initiatives, which is expected to reduce AISC.
In the first quarter of 2018, the Company produced 2,000 ounces from a test stope at Cochenour, which is expected to contribute between 5,000-10,000 ounces in 2018, mainly from development ore. Cochenour is expected to add 30,000 to 50,000 ounces annually to the production at the Red Lake camp once in full production, which is expected in 2019.
Earnings from mine operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year as higher gold sales and a higher realized gold price offset increased production costs related to higher tonnes mined and processed.
AISC for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were consistent with the same period in the prior year as higher sales were offset by higher production costs as a result of higher tonnes mined and processed as well as higher milling costs as the Red Lake mill operated during the first quarter of 2018, compared to the same period in 2017, when it was on standby for the first three quarters of the year.

GOLDCORP  |   22


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Éléonore, Canada (100%-owned)
 
Three months ended March 31
Operating Data
2018

2017

Change

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
422

479

(12
)%
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
5.39

5.36

1
 %
Recovery rate
90
%
92
%
(2
)%
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
67

78

(14
)%
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
65

72

(10
)%
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
$
1,051

$
850

24
 %
AISC (per ounce)
$
1,204

$
1,057

14
 %
Financial Data (in millions)
 
 
 
Revenues
$
86

$
88

(2
)%
Production costs
$
67

$
61

10
 %
Depreciation and depletion
$
34

$
32

6
 %
Loss from mine operations
$
(15
)
$
(5
)
200
 %
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
17

$
29

(41
)%
– Sustaining
$
9

$
14

(36
)%
– Expansionary
$
8

$
15

(47
)%

First Quarter Operating and Financial Highlights
As planned, gold production for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was lower than the same period in the prior year reflecting the optimized mine sequence. Éléonore's tonnes milled were planned to be lower in the first half of 2018 and are expected to increase in the second half of the year as part of the mine sequence and ramp up process.
During the first quarter of 2018, Éléonore advanced the ramp to the bottom of the shaft in Horizon 5, ahead of schedule, creating access to Horizon 5 as an additional area for active mining. The additional mining fronts will add mining flexibility and support lower mining unit costs. With the completion of this key piece of infrastructure the mine is on pace to achieve optimum sustainable gold production rates by the second half of 2018.
The loss from mine operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was higher than the same period in the prior year due to lower sales and higher production costs as a result of higher operating development costs related to mine sequence, partially offset by higher realized gold prices. The completion of the ramp will allow the mine to more efficiently distribute resources, which is expected to contribute to a decrease in mining costs.
AISC for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower gold sales. Sustaining capital was lower due to timing of underground projects and a $3 million rebate received from the provincial government related to energy efficient projects completed.
Expansionary capital expenditures continued to decrease with the completion of the majority of the infrastructure required to support the designed throughput.


GOLDCORP  |   23


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Porcupine, Canada (100%-owned)
 
Three months ended March 31
Operating Data
2018

2017

Change

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
843

766

10
 %
Mill head grade (grams/tonne)
2.68

2.66

1
 %
Recovery rate
93
%
92
%
1
 %
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
68

61

11
 %
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
70

62

13
 %
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
$
708

$
843

(16
)%
AISC (per ounce)
$
896

$
1,011

(11
)%
Financial Data (in millions)
 
 
 
Revenues
$
93

$
76

22
 %
Production costs
$
49

$
53

(8
)%
Depreciation and depletion
$
29

$
27

7
 %
Earnings (loss) from mine operations
$
15

$
(4
)
n/a

Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
28

$
14

100
 %
– Sustaining
$
10

$
7

43
 %
– Expansionary
$
18

$
7

157
 %

First Quarter Operating and Financial Highlights
Gold production for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was higher than the same period in the prior year as higher tonnes from both the Hoyle underground and Hollinger open pit offset the loss of material from the Dome underground, which closed on December 31, 2017. Mine optimization at Hoyle continues as the site leverages the investments in the winze and development to increase mining rates and maintain overall mill grades.
Earnings from mine operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year as a result of higher gold sales, a higher realized gold price and lower production costs due to the removal of the higher cost Dome underground production. Depreciation and depletion was higher for the quarter as a result of higher gold production, a greater proportion of ounces coming from the Hoyle underground, which has a higher depreciation per ounce, and the reversal of a previously recorded impairment at the end of 2017.
AISC for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were lower than the same period in the prior year primarily due to higher production.
Expansionary capital relates to the Waste to Ore demonstration plant, which was completed in the first quarter of 2018, and development and construction activities at the Borden and study costs at the Century project (see the Project Pipeline section below).


GOLDCORP  |   24


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Musselwhite, Canada (100%-owned)
 
Three months ended March 31
Operating Data
2018

2017

Change

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands)
284

304

(7
)%
Average mill head grade (grams/tonne)
6.79

5.71

19
 %
Average recovery rate
96
%
96
%
 %
Gold Produced (thousands of ounces)
59

54

9
 %
Gold Sold (thousands of ounces)
60

56

7
 %
Total Cash Costs: By-product (per ounce)
$
617

$
713

(13
)%
AISC (per ounce)
$
766

$
871

(12
)%
Financial Data (in millions)
 
 
 
Revenues
$
80

$
69

16
 %
Production costs
$
37

$
40

(8
)%
Depreciation and depletion
$
11

$
10

10
 %
Earnings from mine operations
$
32

$
19

68
 %
Expenditures on mining interests (cash basis)
$
24

$
11

118
 %
– Sustaining
$
8

$
7

14
 %
– Expansionary
$
16

$
4

300
 %

First Quarter Operating and Financial Highlights
Gold production for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was higher than the same period in the prior year due to higher grade, partially offset by lower tonnes. Tonnes mined in the three months ended March 31, 2018 were in line with plan and current mine sequence.
A strategic review of the mine plan to utilize excess mill capacity is underway to include new areas identified through recent exploration success that are within the existing mine area and near infrastructure.
Earnings from mine operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were higher than the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of higher revenues due to higher gold sales and a higher realized gold price.
AISC for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were lower than the same period in the prior year due to higher gold sales and lower production costs.
Expansionary capital expenditures related to the Materials Handling project (see the Project Pipeline section below).



GOLDCORP  |   25


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


PROJECT PIPELINE
The current anticipated milestones for 2018 through 2021 for the Company's numerous projects are outlined below:
A2018041781720AM.JPG
Expenditures relating to projects for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):
 
Three Months Ended March 31
 
2018
2017
Peñasquito
$
95

$
34

Musselwhite
16

4

Porcupine
18

7

Red Lake
10

4

Eleonore
8

15

Cerro Negro
7

2

Other
24

8

Total
$
178

$
74

Of the $178 million of project expenditures for three months ended March 31, 2018 ( $74 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 ), $168 million ( $73 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 ) were included in expenditures on mining interests as expansionary capital. Certain Cerro Negro, Coffee, Red Lake and Porcupine costs have been expensed as non-sustaining project and exploration costs.

Peñasquito: Pyrite Leach Project
At Peñasquito, the PLP is 86% complete and is expected to commence commissioning in the fourth quarter of 2018, three months ahead of schedule. The carbon pre-flotation component of the project commenced wet commissioning during April 2018. The PLP is expected to recover approximately 1 million ounces of gold and 44 million ounces of silver over the current life of the mine which would otherwise report to the tailings.

GOLDCORP  |   26


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)



Musselwhite: Materials Handling Project
At Musselwhite, the Materials Handling project is advancing as planned and has achieved 65% completion with detailed engineering completed. The project completed the longer of two 6 metre diameter raise-bore holes required for the shaft during the first quarter of 2018. The completed raise-bore hole was 400 metres in height. The second raise-bore hole is 387 metres in height, of which approximately 130 metres has been completed. Capital costs of the project are tracking 10% below budget and commissioning is expected, on plan, in the first quarter of 2019.

Porcupine: Century Project
In 2017, a base case pre-feasibility study was completed based on a total mineral reserve estimate of 5.7 million ounces of gold. The study excludes approximately 1.0 million ounces of inferred mineral resources within the existing Dome reserve pit design, for which the Company expects a portion to be converted following additional drilling.
Goldcorp has commenced a series of trade-off studies to further optimize the project with a focus on evaluating the latest technologies to reduce project footprint and improve mining and processing efficiencies. Ore sorting technologies, co-mingling of tailings with waste rock (Eco-Tails) to reduce water use, conveying of rock from the pit, electrical and/or autonomous equipment, and optimized process plant design will all be studied as part of this process. The optimized pre-feasibility study is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Porcupine: Borden Project
At Borden, construction of surface infrastructure has been completed. Ramp development has reached 1,116 metres and is on schedule. The bulk sample is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2018. Bulk sample extraction and critical mine production development will be conducted concurrently. The mine is expected to begin commercial production in the second half of 2019 and is expected to comprise approximately one-third of Porcupine's production in 2020.

Coffee Project
Since the acquisition of the Coffee project in July 2016, the Company has accelerated and expanded the scope of exploration in this developing new gold camp. Goldcorp acquired the project not only for the high-grade Coffee gold deposit, but also to participate in the development of the growing mineral wealth within the highly prospective Tintina Gold Province which is endowed with approximately 150 million ounces of gold across the Yukon and Alaska.
Goldcorp submitted the project proposal to the Yukon’s Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (the “YESAB”) on December 6, 2017. The First Nation of Na-Cho Nyak Dun and the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in both submitted letters to YESAB indicating that they have been adequately consulted per the YESAB Adequacy Review requirements. Comments have been received from the Yukon First Nations, Federal and Territorial Governments and YESAB. Goldcorp received its first round of clarification questions for the YESAB adequacy process in the first quarter of 2018; Goldcorp submitted its responses to the YESAB in April 2018.
Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in ("TH"), whose Traditional Territory covers 100% of the project footprint, and Goldcorp are continuing to make good progress towards finalizing a broad benefits agreement that will address the impacts of the Coffee project on TH’s Treaty Rights.  The negotiators for TH and Goldcorp have agreed in principle to the majority of the terms of the collaboration benefits agreement which remain subject to definitive documentation and final approval of both TH and Goldcorp.
Engineering on the project continued to advance with 16% of engineering completed at March 31, 2018, with the target of being 90% complete by the time the final regulatory approval is received.

Red Lake: HG Young Project
The HG Young project continued to advance with development on 14 level complete, rehabilitation ongoing at the 21 level and drilling continuing. Work continued on the concept study at HG Young and, assuming a positive outcome, the Company expects to commence the development of the preferred material handling system to facilitate production and expects to provide parameters for a starter mine plan by late 2019.

Norte Abierto Project
Norte Abierto (50% owned, Chile), which combines the Cerro Casale and Caspiche deposits, controls more than 20,000 hectares of mineral properties, contains a combined gold mineral reserve and mineral resource estimate of 23.2 million ounces of proven and probable mineral reserves, 26.6 million ounces of measured and indicated mineral resources, and 7.8 million ounces of inferred mineral resources and a combined copper mineral reserve and mineral resource estimate of 5.8 billion pounds of proven and probable mineral reserves, 6.7 billion pounds of measured and indicated mineral resources, and 2.6 billion pounds of inferred mineral resources (100% basis).

GOLDCORP  |   27


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Since the acquisition in mid-2017, a dedicated project team has been established in Santiago and Copiapo and work has commenced on key areas including geology studies, community relations, and environmental monitoring. A key milestone for the project was reached on December 29, 2017 when a 3-year voluntary agreement was signed with a local community which enables site access, drilling, and baseline studies on all concessions owned by the project.
In 2018, the project will continue progressing through the initial stage of planned studies with key focus areas including:
Stakeholder engagement including communities, local and federal authorities and agencies, and commercial partners;
Geological review and geologic models update for both Cerro Casale and Caspiche with targeted completion in the third quarter of 2018;
Drilling campaign including infill, definition, geotechnical and metallurgical drilling for Cerro Casale and Caspiche;
District exploration program underway to review prospects, identify and drill test targets satellite deposits; and
Trade-off engineering studies of key value drivers including mining, metallurgy, water, power, and tailings.

NuevaUnión Project
At the end of the first quarter of 2018, a pre-feasibility study ("PFS") on the NuevaUnión project (50% owned) was completed which incorporates key design changes to improve project economics and respond to community and Indigenous peoples input.

The PFS confirms the synergies expected through combining Teck and Goldcorp’s previously separate Relincho and La Fortuna (formerly El Morro) projects and the benefits of ongoing early engagement with communities and Indigenous peoples, including;
Long life asset that can operate through multiple price cycles;
Phased development approach that reduces initial capital investment and execution risk;
Low C1 cash costs (1) in the first phases of development;
Extended mine life from 32 to 36 years, not including 205 million tonnes of Inferred Mineral Resources contained within the current pit designs;
Reduced environmental footprint, infrastructure requirements and energy and water use;
The use of desalinated water during operations, to protect freshwater resources;
Relocation of the tailings facility to the Relincho site in response to concerns expressed by local communities of the previously proposed El Morro tailings facility location within the agriculturally important Huasco River watershed, and
Significant further resource expansion potential and project optimization opportunities.

The PFS includes an estimate for the initial capital cost for the Phase 1 development of the project on a 100% basis of $3.4 to $3.5 billion (not including working capital or interest during construction). Phase 2 development of the project will require additional capital investment to link in the La Fortuna site. Mining the higher-grade portions of Relincho in Phase 1 will allow the project to help fund Phase 2 from project cash flows. Initial production from the La Fortuna mine in Phase 2 will also focus on higher grade areas, providing significant cash flows in the early years of this phase. As a result, the PFS contemplates average annual production of 224,000 tonnes of copper, 269,000 ounces of gold and 1,700 tonnes of molybdenum in concentrate for the first full five years of mine life, or approximately 283,000 tonnes per year of copper equivalent production over the first full 5 years of mine life. Average C1 cash costs are estimated to be US$0.71 per pound payable copper for the first full five years of production, helped by initial gold and copper grades at La Fortuna.

Note 1:
C1 cash costs for copper is defined as the cost of the product delivered to the port of shipment, excluding depreciation and amortization charges. It is common practice in the industry to exclude depreciation and amortization as these costs are ‘non-cash’ and discounted cash flow valuation models used in the industry substitute expectations of future capital spending for these amounts. In order to arrive at C1 cash costs for copper, the Company also deducts the costs of by-products and co-products. Total cash unit costs include the smelter and refining allowances. This presentation allows for a comparison of unit costs, including smelter allowances, to the underlying price of copper in order to assess the margin. The Company's projected C1 cash costs for copper are not based on GAAP total production cash costs. The projected range of C1 cash cost for copper is anticipated to be adjusted to include the costs of by-products and co-products and smelter and refining allowances. Projected GAAP total production cash costs for the full year would require inclusion of the projected impact of future included and excluded items, including items that are not currently determinable, but may be significant. Due to the uncertainty of the likelihood, amount and timing of any such items, we do not have information available to provide a quantitative reconciliation of projected cash costs to a total production C1 cash costs for copper projection.

GOLDCORP  |   28


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


The Relincho and La Fortuna deposits will be bulk open-pit mining operations that will be developed in three production phases. Phase 1 (operating years 1 - 3) sees mining activities and construction of processing and ancillary facilities at the Relincho site. The proposed nominal ore processing rate in Phase 1 will be 104,000 tonnes per day ("t/d"). In Phase 2 (operating years 4 - 18), mining activities transfer to the La Fortuna site utilizing an ore conveyance system to transport ore to the processing facilities at Relincho. The proposed nominal ore processing rate will be 116,000 t/d in Phase 2. Phase 3 (operating years 19 - 36) sees mining activities transfer back to Relincho with an expansion to the processing and ancillary facilities increasing the nominal ore processing rate to 208,000 t/d.

The PFS design covers a processing plant, tailings management facilities and ancillary facilities at the Relincho site and a conveyor system to transport ore from the La Fortuna mine to the concentrator at Relincho. It also includes power transmission lines and substations, a desalination plant, concentrate filtration plant, port and marine structures on the coast and both desalinated water and concentrate pipeline and pumping systems between the coast and the concentrator site.

The Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates set out in the tables below are reported on a 100% basis, as at March 31, 2018. Mineral Resources are reported separately from and do not include that portion of Mineral Resources classified as Mineral Reserves.

Relincho Mineral Reserve
 
Tonnes (million)

Copper Grade (%Cu)

Molybdenum Grade (%Mo)
Proven
552.2

0.34

0.014
Probable
899.8

0.36

0.017
Total
1,452.0

0.35

0.016

Relincho Mineral Resource
 
Tonnes (million)

Copper Grade (%Cu)

Molybdenum Grade (%Mo)
Measured
132.4

0.23

0.007
Indicated
329.2

0.31

0.011
Total M & I
461.6

0.29

0.010
Inferred
589.8

0.37

0.013

Notes:
1.
Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are reported on a 100% basis using an average NSR cut-off of $8.50/t, which assumes metal prices of $3.00/lb copper and $7.50/lb molybdenum.
2.
Mineral Reserves are contained within a Life of Mine ("LOM") pit design. Mining will use conventional open pit methods and equipment with a stockpiling strategy.
3.
Metallurgical recoveries used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources average 88% for copper and 48% for molybdenum, but are variable by block.
4.
Pit slope inter-ramp angles used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources vary from 44-48º. The LOM strip ratio is 1.0 (Waste:Ore).
5.
Processing costs are $5.48/t of material milled and include concentrator and tailings management facility ("TMF").
6.
Desalination costs, make-up water, concentrate transport, port, and general and administrative ("G&A") are $2.97/t milled.
7.
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
8.
Mineral Resources include inferred resources occurring within the LOM pit design and material contained within a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred optimized pit shell generated using the same economic and technical parameters as used for Mineral Reserves.
9.
Tonnage is reported in metric units, copper and molybdenum grades are reported as percentages.
10.
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes and grade where classification categories are combined.


La Fortuna Mineral Reserve
 
Tonnes (million)
Copper Grade (%Cu)
Gold Grade (g/t Au)
Proven
333.6
0.58
0.55
Probable
243.2
0.45
0.38
Total
576.8
0.53
0.48


GOLDCORP  |   29


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


La Fortuna Mineral Resource
 
Tonnes (million)
Copper Grade (%Cu)
Gold Grade (g/t Au)
Measured
0.4
0.56
0.47
Indicated
52.8
0.67
0.85
Total M & I
53.2
0.67
0.85
Inferred
377.0
0.51
0.55

Notes:
1.
Mineral Reserves and open pit Mineral Resources are reported on a 100% basis using an average NSR cut-off of $10.0/t, which assumes metal prices of $3.00/lb copper and $1,250/oz gold.
2.
Mineral Reserves are contained within a LOM pit design. Mining will use conventional open pit methods and equipment with a stockpiling strategy.
3.
Metallurgical recoveries used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources average 86% for copper and 66% for gold, but are variable by block.
4.
Pit slope inter-ramp angles used to define Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources vary from 40-44º for Mineral Reserves. The LOM strip ratio for Mineral Reserves is 3.53 (Waste:Ore).
5.
Processing costs are $6.22/t of material milled and include concentrator and TMF.
6.
Desalination costs, make-up water, concentrate transport, port, and G&A are $2.97/t milled.
7.
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
8.
Open pit Mineral Resources include inferred resources occurring within the LOM pit design and are reported using the same cut-off as used for Mineral Reserves. All Mineral Resources outside of the LOM pit design are defined using a conceptual underground mining envelope. This approach assumes same recoveries, metal prices, processing and G&A costs as used for the open pits but with mining costs and dilution assumptions that are more appropriate to bulk underground mining.
9.
Tonnage is reported in metric units; copper grades are reported as percentages and gold grades are reported as grams per tonne.
10.
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes and grade where classification categories are combined.

A2018041722456PM.JPG

Estimated key project operating parameters are summarized in the following table.
 
Phase 1
Year 1 to 3
Phase 2
Year 4 to 18

Phase 3
Year 19 to 36
Life of Mine
Strip ratio (tonnes waste:ore)
0.33:1
3.53:1
1.02:1
1.70:1
Tonnes milled (tonnes per day) 4
104,000
116,000
208,000
160,000
Copper grade (%Cu)
0.50
0.51
0.34
0.40
Molybdenum grade (%Mo) 1
0.026
0.019
0.015
0.016
Gold grade (g/t) 2
-
0.48
-
0.48
Contained copper production (tonnes per annum) 4
156,000
183,000
218,000
206,000
Contained molybdenum production (tonnes per annum) 1,4
3,900
260
5,400
5,000
Contained gold production (ounces per annum) 2,4
-
395,000
-
395,000
Contained copper equivalent production (tonnes per annum) 3,4
169,000
261,000
236,000
251,000

Notes:
1.
LOM molybdenum grade and contained molybdenum production relates only to the average grade from Relincho ore. Some stockpiled ore from Relincho is processed in Phase 2 on a campaign basis.

GOLDCORP  |   30


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


2.
LOM gold grade and gold production relates only to the average grade from La Fortuna ore.
3.
Copper equivalent figures are calculated by converting molybdenum production into equivalent copper tonnage using $10 per pound molybdenum and $1,300 per ounce gold.
4.
LOM results do not include the first and last year of mine life.

Estimated operating and capital costs are summarized in the following table.
 
Phase 1
Year 1 to 3
Phase 2
Year 4 to 18

Phase 3
Year 19 to 36
Life of Mine
Initial Capital ($, millions)
3,400 - 3,500
 
 
 
Major Enhancement Capital ($, millions)
-
2,600 - 2,700
1,000
 
Sustaining Capital ($, millions)
100
800-850
1,100-1,200
2,000-2,100
Operating Costs ($/tonne milled)
12
17
10
12-13
C1 Cash Costs (US$/payable pound Cu) 1
1.43
0.79
1.76
1.37
Notes:
1.
C1 cash costs are presented after by-product credits assuming $10 per pound of molybdenum and $1,300 per ounce gold.
NuevaUnión is a long-life development opportunity. Numerous opportunities to improve project economics were identified in the PFS, some of which are included in the current project design, such as the use of High Pressure Grinding Rolls in the comminution circuit. Evaluation and optimization of these opportunities will continue in a value creation phase over the next 3 to 4 months before starting feasibility level engineering in the second half of 2018. Detailed project economics will be released with the completion of the Feasibility Study.
Social and environmental baseline work is ongoing, and a potential EIA permit application could be submitted during the Feasibility Study phase which is expected to last approximately 12 months.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The Company has included certain non-GAAP performance measures throughout this document. These performance measures are employed by the Company to measure its operating and economic performance internally and to assist in business decision-making as well as providing key performance information to senior management. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, certain investors and other stakeholders also use this information to evaluate the Company’s operating and financial performance; however, these non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, these performance measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company’s primary business is gold production and its future development and current operations focus are on maximizing returns from gold production, with other metal production being incidental to the gold production process. As a result, where applicable, the Company's non-GAAP performance measures are disclosed on a per gold ounce basis.
The Company calculates its non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable basis. Attributable performance measures include the Company’s mining operations and projects, and the Company’s share of Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión. The inclusion of NuevaUnión in the Company's non-GAAP performance measures primarily impacts the Company's adjusted operating cash flow metric at this time as it is a development stage project. The Company believes that disclosing certain performance measures on an attributable basis provides useful information about the Company’s operating and financial performance, and reflects the Company’s view of its core mining operations.

Non-GAAP Measure - Total Cash Costs: by-product
Total cash costs: by-product incorporate Goldcorp’s share of all production costs, including adjustments to inventory carrying values, adjusted for changes in estimates in reclamation and closure costs at the Company’s closed mines which are non-cash in nature, and include Goldcorp’s share of by-product silver, zinc, lead, and copper credits, and treatment and refining charges included within revenue. Additionally, cash costs are adjusted for realized gains and losses arising on the Company’s commodity and foreign currency contracts which the Company enters into to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in by-product metal prices, heating oil prices and foreign exchange rates, which may impact the Company’s operating costs.
In addition to conventional measures, the Company assesses this per ounce measure in a manner that isolates the impacts of gold production volumes, the by-product credits, and operating costs fluctuations such that the non-controllable and controllable variability is independently addressed. The Company uses total cash costs: by-product per gold ounce to monitor its operating performance internally, including operating cash costs, as well as in its assessment of potential development projects and acquisition targets. The Company believes this measure provides investors and analysts with useful information about the Company’s underlying cash costs of operations and the impact of by-product credits

GOLDCORP  |   31


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


on the Company’s cost structure and is a relevant metric used to understand the Company’s operating profitability and ability to generate cash flow. When deriving the production costs associated with an ounce of gold, the Company includes by-product credits as the Company considers that the cost to produce the gold is reduced as a result of the by-product sales incidental to the gold production process, thereby allowing the Company’s management and other stakeholders to assess the net costs of gold production.
The Company reports total cash costs: by-product on a gold ounces sold basis. In the gold mining industry, this is a common performance measure but does not have any standardized meaning. The Company follows the recommendations of the Gold Institute Production Cost Standard. The Gold Institute, which ceased operations in 2002, was a non-regulatory body and represented a global group of producers of gold and gold products. The production cost standard developed by the Gold Institute remains the generally accepted standard of reporting cash costs of production by gold mining companies.
The Company also reports total cash costs: co-product as a secondary metric to provide further information to the Company's stakeholders. Total cash costs: co-product, per gold ounce, are calculated by allocating Goldcorp‘s share of production costs to each co-product based on the ratio of actual sales volumes multiplied by budget metal prices, as compared to realized sales prices. The Company uses budget prices to eliminate price volatility and improve co-product cash cost reporting comparability between periods. The budget metal prices used in the calculation of total cash costs: co-product were as follows:
 
2018

2017

2016

Gold (per ounce)
$
1,300

$
1,250

$
1,100

Silver (per ounce)
$
19.00

$
19.00

$
15.00

Copper (per pound)
$
2.75

$
2.25

$
2.53

Zinc (per pound)
$
1.30

$
1.00

$
0.80

Lead (per pound)
$
1.10

$
0.89

$
0.80



GOLDCORP  |   32


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


The following tables provide a reconciliation of total cash costs: by-product per ounce to the consolidated financial statements:

Three months ended March 31, 2018 :
 
Production
Costs (1)
By-Product Credits
Treatment and Refining Charges on Concentrate Sales
Other
Total Cash Costs: by-product
Ounces (thousands)
Total Cash Costs: by-product per ounce (2), (3)
Peñasquito
$
181

$
(230
)
$
23

$
(2
)
$
(28
)
90

$
(315
)
Cerro Negro
72

(18
)


54

120

451

Pueblo Viejo
51

(9
)


42

97

423

Red Lake
55




55

61

902

Éléonore
67




67

65

1,051

Porcupine
49




49

70

708

Musselwhite
37




37

60

617

Other mines
34

(12
)
1


23

22

1,046

Corporate
4



(4
)



TOTAL - Attributable basis
$
550

$
(269
)
$
24

$
(6
)
$
299

585

$
511

Less associates and joint ventures
(86
)
23

(1
)

(64
)
(119
)
(536
)
Total - Consolidated
$
464

$
(246
)
$
23

$
(6
)
$
235

466

$
505


Three months ended March 31, 2017 :
 
Production
Costs (1)
By-Product Credits
Treatment and Refining Charges on Concentrate Sales
Other
Total Cash Costs: by-product
Ounces (thousands)
Total Cash Costs: by-product per ounce (2), (3)
Peñasquito
$
193

$
(227
)
$
45

$

$
11

138

$
85

Cerro Negro
52

(12
)


40

88

459

Pueblo Viejo
47

(5
)


42

95

439

Red Lake
47




47

54

861

Éléonore
61




61

72

850

Porcupine
53




53

62

843

Musselwhite
40




40

56

713

Other mines
103

(51
)
3


55

81

691

Corporate







TOTAL - Attributable basis
$
596

$
(295
)
$
48

$

$
349

646

$
540

Less associates and joint ventures
(76
)
32

(3
)

(47
)
(107
)
(436
)
Total - Consolidated
$
520

$
(263
)
$
45

$

$
302

539

$
561


(1)
$16 million in royalties are included in production costs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 ( three months ended March 31, 2017 $23 million ).
(2)
Total cash costs: by-product per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in these tables due to rounding.
(3)
If silver, lead, zinc and copper for Peñasquito, silver for Marlin, silver and copper for Pueblo Viejo, and copper for Alumbrera were treated as co-products, Goldcorp's share of total cash costs: co-product for the three months ended March 31, 2018 , would be $ 696 per ounce of gold, $ 8.76 per ounce of silver, $ 2.57 per pound of copper, $ 0.82 per pound of zinc, and $ 0.83 per pound of lead ( three months ended March 31, 2017 $701 per ounce of gold, $9.47 per ounce of silver, $1.92 per pound of copper, $0.79 per pound of zinc, and $0.94 per pound of lead).

GOLDCORP  |   33


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


NON-GAAP MEASURE – AISC
AISC include total production cash costs incurred at the Company’s mining operations, which forms the basis of the Company’s by-product cash costs. Additionally, the Company includes sustaining capital expenditures, corporate administrative expense, mine-site exploration and evaluation costs, and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. The measure seeks to reflect the full cost of gold production from current operations, therefore expansionary capital and non-sustaining expenditures are excluded. Certain other cash expenditures, including tax payments, dividends and financing costs are also excluded.
The Company believes that this measure represents the total costs of producing gold from current operations, and provides the Company and other stakeholders of the Company with additional information of the Company’s operational performance and ability to generate cash flows. AISC, as a key performance measure, allows the Company to assess its ability to support capital expenditures and to sustain future production from the generation of operating cash flows. This information provides management with the ability to more actively manage capital programs and to make more prudent capital investment decisions.
The Company reports AISC on a gold ounces sold basis. This performance measure was adopted as a result of an initiative undertaken within the gold mining industry; however, this performance measure has no standardized meaning and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company follows the guidance note released by the World Gold Council, which became effective January 1, 2014. The World Gold Council is a non-regulatory market development organization for the gold industry whose members comprise global senior gold mining companies.
As described above, AISC include total production cash costs incurred at the Company's mining operations, which forms the basis of the Company's cash costs: by-product and which are reconciled to reported production costs in the tables above.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of AISC per ounce to the consolidated financial statements:


Three months ended March 31, 2018 :
 
Total cash costs: by-product
Corporate Administration
Exploration and evaluation costs
Reclamation cost accretion and amortization
Sustaining capital expenditures
Total AISC
Ounces (thousands)
Total AISC per ounce (1)
Peñasquito
$
(28
)
$

$
2

$
2

$
36

$
12

90

$
132

Cerro Negro
54


1


17

72

120

600

Pueblo Viejo
42



1

15

58

97

591

Red Lake
55



2

13

70

61

1,139

Éléonore
67


1

1

9

78

65

1,204

Porcupine
49


1

2

10

62

70

896

Musselwhite
37



1

8

46

60

766

Other mines
23




2

25

22

1,175

Corporate (2)

41

1


9

51


87

TOTAL - Attributable basis
$
299

$
41

$
6

$
9

$
119

$
474

585

$
810

Less associates and joint ventures
(64
)


(2
)
(17
)
(83
)
(119
)
(697
)
Total - Consolidated
$
235

$
41

$
6

$
7

$
102

$
391

466

$
839




GOLDCORP  |   34


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Three months ended March 31, 2017 :
 
Total cash costs: by-product
Corporate Administration
Exploration and evaluation costs
Reclamation cost accretion and amortization
Sustaining capital expenditures
Total AISC
Ounces (thousands)
Total AISC per ounce (1)
Peñasquito
$
11

$

$
1

$
1

$
40

$
53

138

$
391

Cerro Negro
40


1

2

14

57

88

651

Pueblo Viejo
42




9

51

95

541

Red Lake
47


1


14

62

54

1,149

Éléonore
61


1


14

76

72

1,057

Porcupine
53



3

7

63

62

1,011

Musselwhite
40


2


7

49

56

871

Other mines
55


1

5

2

63

81

773

Corporate (2)

36



6

42


66

TOTAL - Attributable basis
$
349

$
36

$
7

$
11

$
113

$
516

646

$
800

Less associates and joint ventures
(47
)


(3
)
(9
)
(59
)
(107
)
(551
)
Total - Consolidated
$
302

$
36

$
7

$
8

$
104

$
457

539

$
849


(1)
AISC may not calculate based on amounts presented in these tables due to rounding.
(2)
AISC for Corporate is calculated using total corporate expenditures and the Company's attributable gold sales ounces.

Sustaining capital expenditures are defined as those expenditures which do not increase annual gold ounce production at a mine site and excludes all expenditures at the Company’s projects and certain expenditures at the Company’s operating sites which are deemed expansionary in nature. Sustaining capital expenditures can include, but are not limited to, capitalized stripping costs at open pit mines, underground mine development, mining and milling equipment and tailings dam raises. The following table reconciles sustaining capital expenditures to the Company’s total capital expenditures for continuing operations:
 
Three months ended March 31
 
2018

2017

Expenditures on mining interests per consolidated financial statements
$
267

$
180

Payment of finance lease obligations per consolidated financial statements
2

2

Expenditures on mining interests by Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión (1)
18

4

Goldcorp’s share of expenditures on mining interests and deposits
$
287

$
186

Sustaining capital expenditures
$
119

$
113

Expansionary capital expenditures
168

73

 
$
287

$
186

(1)
Expenditures on mining interests by Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión represent mining interest expenditures, net of additional funding investments, which are included in expenditures on mining interests per the consolidated financial statements.
The following table provides a reconciliation of exploration, evaluation and project costs in the consolidated financial statements to exploration and evaluation costs included in the calculation of Goldcorp’s AISC:
 
Three months ended March 31
 
2018

2017

Exploration, evaluation and project costs per the consolidated financial statements
$
16

$
8

Project exploration costs


Non-sustaining project costs
(10
)
(1
)
Exploration, evaluation and project costs per AISC
$
6

$
7



GOLDCORP  |   35


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Non-GAAP Measure - Adjusted Operating Cash Flows
Adjusted operating cash flows comprises Goldcorp’s share of operating cash flows before working capital changes, calculated on an attributable basis to include the Company's share of Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión's operating cash flows before working capital changes. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company and certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to operate without reliance on additional external funding or use of available cash.
Prior to April 1, 2017, adjusted operating cash flows was presented on an attributable basis using operating cash flows as shown on the Company's statement of cash flows. In the second quarter of 2017, the Company revised its presentation of adjusted operating cash flows to present it on an attributable basis before working capital changes. The Company believes that this measure provides a better measure of the Company's performance of its core business operations as the Company can experience changes in working capital from one period to another which, at times, are not indicative of the performance of the Company’s business operations.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated financial statements to Goldcorp’s share of adjusted operating cash flows:
 
Three months ended March 31
 
2018

2017

Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
$
271

$
227

Change in working capital
8

23

Adjusted operating cash flows provided by Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera and Leagold
71

65

Goldcorp’s share of adjusted operating cash flows
$
350

$
315


Non-GAAP Measure - EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") is a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes the following items from net earnings:
income tax expense;
finance costs;
finance income; and
depreciation and depletion.
Adjusted EBITDA removes the impact of impairments or reversals of impairment and other non-cash expenses or recoveries and is calculated on an attributable basis to include the Company's share of Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión's earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and depletion. The non-cash expenses and recoveries are removed from the calculation of EBITDA as the Company does not believe they are reflective of the Company's ability to generate liquidity and its core operating results.
The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company and certain investors use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of the Company's ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA is also frequently used by investors and analysts for valuation purposes whereby EBITDA is multiplied by a factor or "EBITDA multiple" that is based on an observed or inferred relationship between EBITDA and market values to determine the approximate total enterprise value of a company.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are intended to provide additional information to investors and analysts and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA exclude the impact of cash costs of financing activities and taxes, and the effects of changes in operating working capital balances, and therefore are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently.

GOLDCORP  |   36


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings in the consolidated financial statements to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:


Three months ended March 31
 
2018

2017

Net earnings
$
67

$
170

Income tax expense (recovery)
4

(48
)
Depreciation and depletion
251

246

Finance income
(9
)
(10
)
Finance costs
30

36

EBITDA
$
343

$
394

Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
(9
)
(60
)
Associates and joint venture EBITDA
92

87

Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net

(3
)
Non-cash share-based compensation
7

9

Adjusted EBITDA
$
433

$
427

The following table provides a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated financial statements to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:
 
Three months ended March 31
 
2018

2017

Net cash provided by operating activities
$
271

$
227

Current income tax expense
59

70

Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
9

60

Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net

3

Increase in working capital
8

23

Finance costs
30

36

Finance income
(9
)
(10
)
Other non-cash adjustments
(25
)
(15
)
EBITDA
$
343

$
394

Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
(9
)
(60
)
Associates and joint venture EBITDA
92

87

Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net

(3
)
Non-cash share-based compensation
7

9

Adjusted EBITDA
$
433

$
427


Non-GAAP Measure - Adjusted Net Debt
Adjusted net debt is comprised of Goldcorp’s short-term and long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents and short term investments, calculated on an attributable basis to include the Company's share of Pueblo Viejo, Alumbrera, Leagold and NuevaUnión's net debt. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company and certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company’s financial position and its ability to take on new debt in the future to expand operations, purchase new assets or withstand adverse economic conditions.

GOLDCORP  |   37


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


The following table provides a reconciliation of short and long-term debt to adjusted net debt:
 
March 31
2018

December 31
2017

Current portion of long-term debt
$
400

$
499

Long-term debt
2,035

1,984

Cash and cash equivalents
(123
)
(186
)
Short term investments
(40
)
(48
)
Net Debt
2,272

2,249

Debt of associates and joint venture


Cash and short term investments of associates and joint venture
(186
)
(163
)
Adjusted Net Debt
$
2,086

$
2,086


RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Financial Instruments Risk Exposure

The Company manages its exposure to financial risks, including credit risk, liquidity risk, currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk, in accordance with its Financial Risk Management Policy. The Company's exposures to financial risks and how the Company manages each of those risks are described in note 26(e) to the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 . There were no significant changes to the Company's exposures to those risks or to the Company's management of its exposures during the three months ended March 31, 2018 except as noted below.
(i)    Liquidity risk
During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company generated cash flows from operations, one of the Company's main sources of liquidity, of $ 271 million ( three months ended March 31, 2017 – $ 227 million ). At March 31, 2018 , Goldcorp held cash and cash equivalents of $ 123 million ( December 31, 2017 $186 million ) and short-term investments of $ 40 million ( December 31, 2017 $48 million ). At March 31, 2018 , the Company's working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, was negative $ 94 million ( December 31, 2017 – negative $ 112 million ). Despite the increase in cash flow from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year, the Company’s working capital was negative at March 31, 2018 as the Company has reinvested its cash in its expansion projects at Peñasquito and Musselwhite and used funds to reduce its debt during the quarter.
On March 14, 2018, the Company entered into three one-year non-revolving term loan agreements, totaling $400 million. The term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.65%, reset monthly, and are repayable before March 14, 2019 without penalty. The proceeds from the term loans were used to repay the $500 million 2.125% notes that were due on March 15, 2018.
At March 31, 2018 , the balance outstanding on the revolving credit facility was $50 million (December 31, 2017 – $nil) with $2.95 billion available for the Company's use (December 31, 2017 – $3.0 billion). Certain of the Company's borrowings are subject to various financial and general covenants with which the Company was in compliance at March 31, 2018 .
At March 31, 2018 , the Company had letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $ 420 million ( December 31, 2017 $420 million ) of which $ 323 million ( December 31, 2017 – $323 million) represented guarantees for reclamation obligations. The Company's capital commitments for the next twelve months amounted to $ 362 million at March 31, 2018 , including the Company's funding obligation for the Norte Abierto project for the next twelve months.
(ii)    Market risk
Currency risk
During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company recognized a net foreign exchange gain of $7 million ( three months ended March 31, 2017 gain of $21 million ), and a net foreign exchange loss of $25 million in income tax expense on income taxes receivable (payable) and deferred income taxes ( three months ended March 31, 2017 gain of $68 million ).

GOLDCORP  |   38


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Based on the Company’s net foreign currency exposures at March 31, 2018 , depreciation or appreciation of applicable foreign currencies against the US dollar would have resulted in the following decrease or increase in the Company's net earnings:
At March 31, 2018
Possible exposure (1)
Impact on earnings excluding currency exposure related to taxes
Impact on earnings from foreign exchange exposure related to taxes
Canadian dollar
10%
$
10

$
102

Mexican peso
20%
17

82

Argentine peso
15%
4

44


(1 ) Calculated based on fluctuations of foreign exchange rates during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.

Other Risks and Uncertainties
This section describes the principal risk and uncertainties that could have an adverse effect on the Company's business and financial results.
Commodity Prices
The majority of the Company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold, silver and zinc, and to a lesser extent, copper and lead. The price of the Company’s Common Shares, its financial results and exploration, and its development and mining activities in the future may be materially adversely affected by declines in the price of gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead. Gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, such as the sale or purchase of metals by various central banks and financial institutions, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional supply and demand, and the political and economic conditions of major metals-producing and metals-consuming countries throughout the world. The prices of gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead fluctuate widely, and future price declines could cause continued development of, and commercial production from, our properties to be uneconomic. Depending on the price of gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead, cash flow from mining operations may not be sufficient and the Company could be forced to discontinue production at, may lose its interest in, or may be forced to sell, some of its properties. Future production from the Company’s mining properties is dependent on the price of gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead that are adequate to make these properties economically viable.
Estimates of Future Production
The Company prepares estimates and projections of its future production. Any such information is forward-looking and no assurance can be given that such estimates will be achieved. These estimates are based on existing mine plans and other assumptions that change from time to time, including the availability, accessibility, sufficiency and quality of ore, the Company’s costs of production, its ability to sustain and increase production levels, the sufficiency of its infrastructure, the performance of its workforce and equipment, the ability to maintain and obtain mining interests and permits and the Company’s compliance with existing and future laws and regulations. The Company’s actual production may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including: actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade, tonnage, dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics; short-term operating factors relating to the Mineral Reserves, such as the need for sequential development of orebodies and the processing of new or different ore grades; revisions to mine plans; unusual or unexpected orebody formations; risks and hazards associated with mining; natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions, water availability, floods, and earthquakes; and unexpected labor shortages, strikes, local community opposition or blockades. Failure to achieve the estimated forecasts could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future cash flows, business, results of operations and financial condition.
Foreign Operations
The majority of the Company’s foreign operations are conducted in Mexico, Argentina, the Dominican Republic and Chile, and as such the Company’s operations are exposed to various levels of political, economic and other risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties vary from country to country and include, but are not limited to, terrorism; hostage taking; military repression; expropriation; extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labour unrest; the risks of war, civil unrest or protests; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts; ability of governments to unilaterally alter agreements; government imposed supply laws, including laws establishing, among other things, profit margins, production quotas, maximum and minimum price levels and the ability to confiscate merchandise in certain circumstances; surface land access issues; illegal mining; changes in taxation policies, practices, regulations and laws; restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; and changing political conditions, currency controls and governmental regulations that favour or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction.
In addition, adverse changes in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitude in Mexico, Argentina, the Dominican Republic and Chile may adversely affect the Company’s operations or profitability. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations

GOLDCORP  |   39


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, import restrictions on equipment, services and supplies, currency remittance, income taxes, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, surface land access, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety.
Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral right applications and tenure, environmental requirements, land and water use, could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners with carried or other interests. The occurrence of these various factors and uncertainties related to the economic and political risks of operating in foreign jurisdictions cannot be accurately predicted and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations or profitability.
Government Regulation
The Company’s mining, processing, development and mineral exploration activities are subject to various laws governing prospecting, development, production, taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances, land use, water use, land claims of local and indigenous people and other matters. No assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner which could limit or curtail production or development. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations and activities of mining and milling or more stringent implementation thereof could have a material adverse impact on the operations and financial position of the Company. Changes to laws regarding mining royalties or taxes, or other elements of a country’s fiscal regime, may also adversely affect the Company’s costs of operations and financial results.
In addition, as governments continue to struggle with deficits and concerns over the effects of depressed economies, the mining and metals sector has been targeted to raise revenue. Governments are continually assessing the fiscal terms of the economic rent for a mining company to exploit resources in their countries. Numerous countries, including, but not limited to, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Venezuela, have implemented changes to their respective mining regimes that reflect increased government control or participation in the mining sector, including changes of law affecting foreign ownership and take-overs, mandatory government participation, taxation and royalties, working conditions, rates of exchange, exchange control, exploration licensing, export duties, repatriation of income or return of capital, environmental protection, as well as requirements for local goods, supplies and employment or other benefits to be provided to local residents.
The occurrence of mining regime changes in both developed and developing countries adds uncertainties that cannot be accurately predicted and any future adverse changes in government policies or legislation in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates that affect foreign ownership, mineral exploration, development or mining activities, may affect our viability and profitability.
Environmental Regulation
The Company’s operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set out limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that will likely, in the future, require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Continuing issues with tailings dam failures at other companies' operations may increase the likelihood that these stricter standards and enforcement mechanisms will be implemented in the future. The Company can provide no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation will not adversely affect the Company's results of operations. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations or in the exploration or development of mineral properties may also be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage due to the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. The occurrence of any environmental violation or enforcement action may have an adverse impact on the Company’s reputation and could adversely affect its results of operations. In addition, production at certain of the Company’s mines involves the use of sodium cyanide or other reagents and exposes rock material that could cause toxicity to the environment if released or not properly managed. Should sodium cyanide, other reagents, or contact water be improperly managed, leak or otherwise be discharged from the containment system, the Company may become subject to liability for clean-up work that may not be insured. In the event of any discharges of pollutants into the ground water and the environment, the Company may become subject to liability for hazards that we may not be insured against.
Other Risks
For further information regarding the Company’s operational risks, please refer to the section entitled “Description of the Business - Risk Factors” in the Company's most recent annual information form available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

GOLDCORP  |   40


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


ACCOUNTING MATTERS

Basis of Preparation
The Company's unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 – Interim Financial Reporting ("IAS 34") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"). Accordingly, certain disclosures included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs") as issued by the IASB have been condensed or omitted. The Company's unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 .
The accounting policies applied in the preparation of the Company's unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements are consistent with those applied and disclosed in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 , except for the following:
Financial instruments
On January, 1 2018, the Company adopted IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments ("IFRS 9") which replaced IAS 39 – Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement . IFRS 9 provides a revised model for recognition and measurement of financial instruments and a single, forward-looking 'expected loss' impairment model. IFRS 9 also includes significant changes to hedge accounting. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company adopted the standard using the modified retrospective approach, except for hedge accounting, which was applied prospectively. IFRS 9 did not impact the Company's accounting policies for the classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities except for equity securities as described below. The standard also had negligible impact on the carrying amounts of our financial instruments at the transition date.
The following summarizes the significant changes in IFRS 9 compared to the current standard:
IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is classified and measured at amortized cost or fair value. The classification and measurement of financial assets is based on the Company's business models for managing its financial assets and whether the contractual cash flows represent solely payments for principal and interest. Most of the requirements in IAS 39 for classification and measurement of financial liabilities were carried forward in IFRS 9. The change did not impact the carrying amounts of any of our financial assets on the transition date. The Company designated its equity securities as financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income ("FVTOCI"), where they will be recorded initially at fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value will be recognized in other comprehensive income only and will not be transferred into earnings (loss) upon disposition. As a result of this change, the Company reclassified $46 million of impairment losses recognized in prior years on certain equity securities which continue to be owned by the Company as at January 1, 2018 from opening deficit to accumulated other comprehensive income on January 1, 2018. As a result of adopting IFRS 9, the net change in fair value of the equity securities, including realized and unrealized gains and losses, if any, is now presented as an item that will not be reclassified subsequently to net earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Realized gains and losses on securities derecognized prior to January 1, 2018 have not been restated in prior year comparatives.
The adoption of the new "expected credit loss" impairment model under IFRS 9, as opposed to an incurred credit loss model under IAS 39, had a negligible impact on the carrying amounts of our financial assets on the transition date given the Company transacts exclusively with large international financial institutions and other organizations with strong credit ratings and the negligible historical level of customer default.
The new general hedge accounting requirements retain the three types of hedge accounting mechanisms previously available under IAS 39. Under IFRS 9 however, greater flexibility has been introduced to the types of transactions eligible for hedge accounting, specifically broadening the types of instruments that qualify for hedging instruments and the types of risk components of non-financial items that are eligible for hedge accounting. As a result, certain of the Company's hedging strategies and hedging instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting previously, primarily the hedging of its forecasted concentrate sales, are now eligible for hedge accounting. In addition, the effectiveness test has been replaced with the principle of an "economic relationship". Retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness is also no longer required. Enhanced disclosure requirements about an entity's risk management activities have also been introduced. As a result, subsequent to the adoption of IFRS 9, the Company hedged a certain percentage of its forecasted zinc and lead sales and has designated these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. These contracts were entered into during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The Company did not designate its economic hedges that existed as at January 1, 2018 as hedges for accounting purposes.
The Company has also adopted a narrow scope amendment to IFRS 7 - Financial Instruments - Disclosures . As a result of applying the amendment, the Company will adding disclosure relating to its risk management strategies for which hedge accounting is applied in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Revenue recognition
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15") which supersedes IAS 18 – Revenue ("IAS 18"). IFRS 15 establishes a single five-step model framework for determining the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and

GOLDCORP  |   41


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


cash flows arising from a contract with a customer. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective approach.
IFRS 15 requires entities to recognize revenue when ‘control’ of goods or services transfers to the customer whereas the previous standard, IAS 18, required entities to recognize revenue when the ‘risks and rewards’ of the goods or services transfer to the customer. The Company concluded there is no change in the timing of revenue recognition of its bullion, doré and concentrate sales under the new standard as the point of transfer of risks and rewards of goods and services and transfer of control occur at the same time. As such, no adjustment was required to the Company's financial statements on January 1, 2017 and 2018.
Additionally, IFRS 15 requires entities to apportion revenue earned from contracts to distinct performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. In accordance with the terms of the Company's concentrate agreements, the Company must contract for and pay the shipping and insurance costs necessary to bring the goods to the named destination. Therefore, where material, a portion of the revenue earned under these contracts, representing the obligation to fulfill the shipping and insurance services that occur after the transfer of control, will be deferred and recognized over time as the obligations are fulfilled. The impact of this change is not expected to be significant and did not result in any classification or measurement adjustment on January 1, 2017 and 2018.
IFRS 15 requires that variable consideration should only be recognized to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company concluded that the adjustments relating to the final assay results for the quantity and quality of concentrate sold and the retroactive pricing adjustment for the new annual pricing terms are not significant and does not constrain the recognition of revenue.
Additional disclosures required as a result of adopting IFRS 15 have been presented in notes 3 and 11 of the notes to the Company's unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
Other narrow scope amendments/interpretations
The Company has adopted narrow scope amendments/interpretations to IFRIC 22 - Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration, IFRS 2 - Share Based Payments and IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements , which did not have an impact on the Company's unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
Critical Judgements and Estimates
The Company’s management makes judgements in its process of applying the Company’s accounting policies in the preparation of its unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements. In addition, the preparation of the financial data requires that the Company’s management makes assumptions and estimates of the impacts of uncertain future events on the carrying amounts of the Company’s assets and liabilities at the end of the reporting period, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates as the estimation process is inherently uncertain. Estimates are reviewed on an ongoing basis based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant under the circumstances. Revisions to estimates and the resulting impacts on the carrying amounts of the Company’s assets and liabilities are accounted for prospectively.
Certain accounting judgements and estimates have been identified as being "critical" to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations. Critical judgements and estimates are those that could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, are highly uncertain and are where changes are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. The Company's critical accounting judgements and estimates are generally discussed with the Audit Committee each quarter. The critical judgements and estimates applied in the preparation of the Company's unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are consistent with those applied and disclosed in notes 5 and 6 of its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the following critical judgments in applying accounting policies:
Revenue recognition

Determination of performance obligations
The Company applied judgement to determine if a good or service that is promised to a customer is distinct based on whether the customer can benefit from the good or service on its own or together with other readily available resources and whether the good or service is separately identifiable. Based on these criteria, the Company determined the primary performance obligation relating to its sales contracts is the delivery of the bullion, doré and concentrates. Shipping and insurance services arranged by the Company for its concentrate sales customers that occur after the transfer of control are also considered to be performance obligations; however, the amount of revenue related to these performance obligations is immaterial to both the individual transaction and the Company as a whole and therefore, has not been accounted for separately.
    
Transfer of control    
Judgement is required to determine when transfer of control occurs relating to the sale of the Company's bullion, doré and concentrate to its customers. Management based its assessment on a number of indicators of control, which include, but are not limited to whether the Company

GOLDCORP  |   42


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


has present right of payment, and whether the physical possession of the goods, significant risks and rewards and legal title have been transferred to the customer.

Variable consideration    
Variable consideration should only be recognized to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company identified two variable components in the sales proceeds it receives from its concentrate sales. They include (i) adjustments to the final sales price base on differences between the original and final assaying results and (ii) retroactive pricing adjustment based on new annual pricing terms. The Company applied judgement to determine the amount of variable consideration to be recognized during the period for which the likelihood of reversal is low.
Based on the Company's proficiency in its assaying process, evidenced by the insignificant amount of historical adjustments from the initial to final assays, the Company concluded the variability in consideration caused by assaying results is negligible. Therefore, the Company does not expect a significant amount of reversal in revenue related to assaying differences.
Negotiations for the upcoming year pricing terms for lead and zinc concentrate contracts commence during the last quarter of the year and can extend through to the next year. If the new terms are not finalized prior to January 1 of the next year, previous year’s pricing continues to apply until the new terms are finalized, upon which, total sale proceeds, and therefore revenue, will be adjusted retroactively to reflect the new terms. The impact of the price negotiations did not result in significant adjustments in the past two fiscal years. Management estimated the impact of potential changes in treatment and refining charges and the percentage of metal payable for 2018's concentrate sales based on industry knowledge and the status of price negotiations through March 31, 2018. Based on this, Management concluded that the impact of the finalization of the 2018 concentrate pricing terms will not be significant and does not constrain the recognition of revenue during the period prior to finalization of the 2018 pricing.

Changes in Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective
Leases
In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 – Leases ("IFRS 16") which replaces IAS 17 – Leases and its associated interpretative guidance. IFRS 16 applies a control model to the identification of leases, distinguishing between a lease and a service contract on the basis of whether the customer controls the asset. For those assets determined to meet the definition of a lease, IFRS 16 introduces significant changes to the accounting by lessees, introducing a single, on-balance sheet accounting model that is similar to the current finance lease accounting, with limited exceptions for short-term leases or leases of low value assets. Lessor accounting remains similar to current accounting practice. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, with early application permitted for entities that apply IFRS 15. A lessee can choose to apply IFRS 16 using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. The Company plans to apply IFRS 16 at the date it becomes effective but has not yet selected a transition approach.
Upon the adoption of IFRS 16, the Company anticipates it will record a material balance of lease assets and associated lease liabilities related to leases with a term of 12 months or more on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 1, 2019. Due to the recognition of additional lease assets and liabilities, a higher amount of depreciation expense and interest on lease liabilities will be recognized under IFRS 16 as compared to the current standard. Additionally, a reduction in production and/or corporate administration costs is expected. Lastly, the Company expects an increase in operating cash inflows with a corresponding increase in financing cash outflows under IFRS 16.
The Company is in the process of identifying and collecting data relating to existing agreements that may contain right-of-use assets. These include land easements and service contracts that may contain embedded leases for property, plant and equipment. At this time, it is not possible for the Company to make reasonable quantitative estimates of the effects of the new standard. The Company estimates the time frame to develop and implement the accounting policies, estimates and processes (including the information technology systems) will extend into the latter part of 2018.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of its (1) President and Chief Executive Officer and (2) Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the results of that evaluation, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the appropriate time periods and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

GOLDCORP  |   43


Third Quarter Report – 2017
(in United States dollars, tabular amounts in millions, except where noted)


Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management, with the participation of its President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Company’s Directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations of Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development, believes that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, they cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been prevented or detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by unauthorized override of the control. The design of any control system also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.


GOLDCORP  |   44


A11354QUARTERLYCOVERS2018V1A.JPG




                                
Exhibit 99.2
First Quarter Report – 2018

C ONDENSED I NTERIM C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS O F E ARNINGS
(In millions of United States dollars, except for per share amounts – Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31
   
Note  
2018

2017

Revenues
3
$
846

$
882

Mine operating costs
 
 
 
Production costs
3, 4
(464
)
(520
)
Depreciation and depletion
3, 9(d)
(251
)
(246
)
 
 
(715
)
(766
)
Earnings from mine operations
 
131

116

Exploration, evaluation and project costs
9(a)
(16
)
(8
)
Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
10
9

60

Corporate administration
4(a)
(41
)
(36
)
Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net
 

3

Restructuring costs
 

(1
)
Earnings from operations, associates and joint venture
3
83

134

Gain on derivatives, net
 
5

5

Finance costs
 
(30
)
(36
)
Other income, net
5
13

19

Earnings before taxes
 
71

122

Income tax (expense) recovery
6
(4
)
48

Net earnings
 
$
67

$
170

 
 
 
 
Net earnings per share
 
 
 
Basic
7(a)
$
0.08

$
0.20

Diluted
7(a)
0.08

0.20












The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

GOLDCORP    |   1


First Quarter Report – 2018



C ONDENSED I NTERIM C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS O F C OMPREHENSIVE I NCOME
(In millions of United States dollars – Unaudited)


Three Months Ended March 31
  

2018

2017

Net earnings
 
$
67

$
170

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to net earnings:
 
 
 
Unrealized gains (losses)
 
 
 
          Equity securities (note 2)
 

(4
)
          Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
6

19

Reclassification of realized gains
 
 
 
Equity securities
 

(2
)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges recognized in net earnings
 
(1
)

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges recorded as property, plant and equipment
 
(1
)

 
 
4

13

Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to net earnings:
 
 
 
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension plans
 

(1
)
   Net change in equity securities (note 2)
 
(29
)

 
 
(29
)
(1
)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
 
(25
)
12

Total comprehensive income
 
$
42

$
182

















The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements. 

GOLDCORP    |   2


First Quarter Report – 2018



C ONDENSED I NTERIM C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS O F C ASH F LOWS
(In millions of United States dollars – Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31
  
Note        
2018

2017

Operating activities
 
 
 
Net earnings
 
$
67

$
170

Adjustments for:
 


   Reclamation expenditures
 
(6
)
(2
)
Items not affecting cash:
 


Depreciation and depletion
3, 9(d)
251

246

Share of net earnings related to associates and joint venture
10
(9
)
(60
)
Reversal of impairment of mining interests, net
 

(3
)
Share-based compensation
 
7

9

Unrealized gains on derivatives, net
 
(3
)
(5
)
Revision of estimates and accretion of closure cost obligations
 
7

6

Deferred income tax recovery
6
(55
)
(118
)
Other
 
20

7

Increase in working capital
8
(8
)
(23
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
271

227

Investing activities
 


Expenditures on mining interests
3, 9(b)
(267
)
(180
)
Return of capital investment in associate
10
25

43

Interest paid
9(b)
(14
)
(10
)
Purchases of short-term investments and available-for-sale securities, net
8
(8
)
(35
)
Settlement of deferred payment obligation
 
(4
)

Other
 

(65
)
Net cash used in investing activities
 
(268
)
(247
)
Financing activities
 


Proceeds from issuance of term loans, net of borrowing costs
11(c)(i)
400


Debt repayments
11(c)(i)
(500
)

Draw down of credit facility, net
11(c)(i)
50

70

Finance lease payments
 
(2
)
(2
)
Dividends paid to shareholders
7(b)
(14
)
(15
)
Common shares issued
 

1

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
 
(66
)
54

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 


(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
(63
)
34

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
 
186

157

Cash and cash equivalents reclassified as held for sale at the beginning of the period
 

20

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
8
$
123

211

Cash and cash equivalents reclassified as held for sale
 

(42
)
Cash and cash equivalents, excluding amounts classified as held for sale, end of period
8
$
123

$
169

Supplemental cash flow information (note 8 )


The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

GOLDCORP    |   3


First Quarter Report – 2018



C ONDENSED I NTERIM C ONSOLIDATED B ALANCE S HEETS
(In millions of United States dollars – Unaudited)
   
Note
At March 31
2018

At December 31
2017

Assets
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
8
$
123

$
186

Short-term investments
 
40

48

Accounts receivable
 
139

146

Inventories
 
445

441

Sales and indirect taxes recoverable
 
263

250

Income taxes receivable
 
23

24

Other
 
38

48

 
 
1,071

1,143

Mining interests
 
 
 
Owned by subsidiaries and joint operation
9
17,363

17,311

Investments in associates and joint venture
10
2,730

2,736

 
 
20,093

20,047

Equity securities
 
163

178

Deferred income taxes
 
86

112

Inventories
 

16

Other
 
202

189

Total assets
3
$
21,615

$
21,685

 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
$
560

$
574

Debt
11(c)(i)
400

499

Income taxes payable
 
128

98

Provisions and other
 
77

84

 
 
1,165

1,255

Deferred income taxes
 
2,981

3,063

Debt
 
2,035

1,984

Deferred payment obligation

 
180

182

Provisions
 
616

610

Finance lease obligations
 
239

242

Income taxes payable
 
133

122

Other
 
47

43

Total liabilities
3
7,396

7,501

Shareholders' equity
 
 
 
Common shares, stock options and restricted share units
 
18,271

18,261

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
 
(48
)
23

Deficit
 
(4,004
)
(4,100
)
 
 
14,219

14,184

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
 
$
21,615

$
21,685

Commitments and contingencies (notes 11(c)(i) and 12 )




The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

GOLDCORP    |   4


First Quarter Report – 2018



C ONDENSED I NTERIM C ONSOLIDATED S TATEMENTS O F C HANGES I N E QUITY
(In millions of United States dollars, shares in thousands – Unaudited)
 
Common Shares
 
 
 
 
   
Shares issued,
fully paid with
no par value
Amount
Stock options
and restricted
share units
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Deficit 
Total
At January 1, 2018
867,346

$
17,930

$
331

$
23

$
(4,100
)
$
14,184

Impact of adopting IFRS 9 on January 1, 2018 (note 2)



(46
)
46


At January 1, 2018 (restated)
867,346

17,930

331

(23
)
(4,054
)
14,184

Total comprehensive income





 
   Net earnings




67

67

   Other comprehensive loss



(25
)

(25
)
 



(25
)
67

42

Stock options exercised and restricted share units vested
1,525

25

(25
)



Share-based compensation


7



7

Dividends (note 7(b))
225

3



(17
)
(14
)
At March 31, 2018
869,096

$
17,958

$
313

$
(48
)
$
(4,004
)
$
14,219

 
Common Shares
 
 
 
 
   
Shares issued,
fully paid with
no par value
Amount
Stock options and restricted share units
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Deficit
Total
At January 1, 2017
853,812

$
17,733

$
331

$
41

$
(4,690
)
$
13,415

Total comprehensive income





 
   Net earnings




170

170

   Other comprehensive income



12


12

 



12

170

182

Stock options exercised and restricted share units vested
1,548

30

(30
)



Share-based compensation


9



9

Dividends (note 7(b))
121

2



(17
)
(15
)
At March 31, 2017
855,481

$
17,765

$
310

$
53

$
(4,537
)
$
13,591

                        


The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements. 

GOLDCORP    |   5


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



N OTES TO THE C ONDENSED I NTERIM C ONSOLIDATED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS
F OR T HE T HREE M ONTHS E NDED M ARCH  31, 2018 AND 2017
 
1 .
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Goldcorp Inc. is the ultimate parent company of its consolidated group ("Goldcorp" or "the Company"). The Company is incorporated and domiciled in Canada, and its head office is at Suite 3400 – 666 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2X8.
The Company is a gold producer engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, operation and reclamation of precious metal properties in Canada, the United States, Mexico, and Central and South America. The Company’s current sources of operating cash flows are primarily from the sale of gold, silver, lead, zinc and copper.
The Company’s principal producing mining properties are comprised of the Éléonore, Musselwhite, Porcupine and Red Lake mines in Canada; the Peñasquito mine in Mexico; the Cerro Negro mine in Argentina; and the Pueblo Viejo mine ( 40% interest) in the Dominican Republic. At March 31, 2018 , the Company's significant projects include the Borden, Century and Coffee projects in Canada, and the NuevaUnión ( 50% interest) and Norte Abierto (50% interest) projects in Chile.

2 .
BASIS OF PREPARATION
These Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Goldcorp Inc., the ultimate parent company of its consolidated group, and its subsidiaries and are prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 – Interim Financial Reporting ("IAS 34") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"). Certain disclosures included in the Annual Financial Statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs") as issued by the IASB have been condensed or omitted. Accordingly, these Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 .
The Company’s interim results are not necessarily indicative of its results for a full year. All amounts are expressed in US dollars, unless otherwise noted. References C$ are to Canadian dollars.
The accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements are consistent with those applied and disclosed in the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 , except for the following:
Financial instruments
On January, 1 2018, the Company adopted IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments ("IFRS 9") which replaced IAS 39 – Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement . IFRS 9 provides a revised model for recognition and measurement of financial instruments and a single, forward-looking 'expected loss' impairment model. IFRS 9 also includes significant changes to hedge accounting. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company adopted the standard using the modified retrospective approach, except for hedge accounting, which was applied prospectively. IFRS 9 did not impact the Company's classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities except for equity securities as described below. The standard also had negligible impact on the carrying amounts of our financial instruments at the transition date.
The following summarizes the significant changes in IFRS 9 compared to the current standard:
IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is classified and measured at amortized cost or fair value. The classification and measurement of financial assets is based on the Company's business models for managing its financial assets and whether the contractual cash flows represent solely payments for principal and interest. Most of the requirements in IAS 39 for classification and measurement of financial liabilities were carried forward in IFRS 9. The change did not impact the carrying amounts of any of our financial assets on the transition date. The Company designated its equity securities as financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income ("FVTOCI"), where they will be recorded initially at fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value will be recognized in other comprehensive income only and will not be transferred into earnings (loss) upon disposition. As a result of this change, the Company reclassified $46 million of impairment losses recognized in prior years on certain equity securities which continue to be owned by the Company as at January 1, 2018 from opening deficit to accumulated other comprehensive income on January 1, 2018. As a result of adopting IFRS 9, the net change in fair value of the equity securities, including realized and unrealized gains and losses, if any, is now presented as an item that will not be reclassified subsequently to net earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Realized gains and losses on securities derecognized prior to January 1, 2018 have not been restated in prior year comparatives.
The adoption of the new "expected credit loss" impairment model under IFRS 9, as opposed to an incurred credit loss model under IAS 39, had a negligible impact on the carrying amounts of our financial assets on the transition date given the Company transacts

GOLDCORP    |   6


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



exclusively with large international financial institutions and other organizations with strong credit ratings and the negligible historical level of customer default.
The new general hedge accounting requirements retain the three types of hedge accounting mechanisms previously available under IAS 39. Under IFRS 9 however, greater flexibility has been introduced to the types of transactions eligible for hedge accounting, specifically broadening the types of instruments that qualify for hedging instruments and the types of risk components of non-financial items that are eligible for hedge accounting. As a result, certain of the Company's hedging strategies and hedging instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting previously, primarily the hedging of its forecasted concentrate sales, are now eligible for hedge accounting. In addition, the effectiveness test has been replaced with the principle of an "economic relationship". Retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness is also no longer required. Enhanced disclosure requirements about an entity's risk management activities have also been introduced. As a result, subsequent to the adoption of IFRS 9, the Company hedged a certain percentage of its forecasted zinc and lead sales and has designated these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. These contracts were entered into during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The Company did not designate its economic hedges that existed as at January 1, 2018 as hedges for accounting purposes.
The Company has also adopted a narrow scope amendment to IFRS 7 - Financial Instruments - Disclosures . As a result of applying the amendment, the Company will add disclosure relating to its risk management strategies for which hedge accounting is applied in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Revenue recognition
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15") which supersedes IAS 18 – Revenue ("IAS 18"). IFRS 15 establishes a single five-step model framework for determining the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with a customer. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective approach without applying any practical expedients.
IFRS 15 requires entities to recognize revenue when ‘control’ of goods or services transfers to the customer whereas the previous standard, IAS 18, required entities to recognize revenue when the ‘risks and rewards’ of the goods or services transfer to the customer. The Company concluded there is no change in the timing of revenue recognition of its bullion, doré and concentrate sales under IFRS 15 compared to the previous standard as the point of transfer of risks and rewards of goods and services and transfer of control occur at the same time. As such, no adjustment was required to the Company's financial statements.
Additionally, IFRS 15 requires entities to apportion the transaction price attributable to contracts from customers to distinct performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. In accordance with the terms of the Company's concentrate agreements, the Company must contract for and pay the shipping and insurance costs necessary to bring the goods to the named destination. Therefore a portion of the revenue earned under these contracts, representing the obligation to fulfill the shipping and insurance services that occur after the transfer of control, is deferred and recognized over time as the obligations are fulfilled. The impact of this change was insignificant to the Company’s financial statements.
IFRS 15 requires that variable consideration should only be recognized to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company concluded that the adjustments relating to the final assay results for the quantity and quality of concentrate sold and the retroactive pricing adjustment for the new annual pricing terms are not significant and does not constrain the recognition of revenue.
Additional disclosures have been presented in notes 3 and 11 as a result of adopting IFRS 9 and 15.
Other narrow scope amendments/interpretations
The Company has adopted narrow scope amendments/interpretations to IFRIC 22 - Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration, IFRS 2 - Share Based Payments and IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements , which did not have an impact on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Changes in accounting policies not yet effective:
Leases
In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 – Leases ("IFRS 16") which replaces IAS 17 – Leases and its associated interpretative guidance. IFRS 16 applies a control model to the identification of leases, distinguishing between a lease and a service contract on the basis of whether the customer controls the asset. For those assets determined to meet the definition of a lease, IFRS 16 introduces significant changes to the accounting by lessees, introducing a single, on-balance sheet accounting model that is similar to the current finance lease accounting, with limited exceptions for short-term leases or leases of low value assets. Lessor accounting remains similar to current accounting practice. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, with early application permitted for entities that apply

GOLDCORP    |   7


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



IFRS 15. A lessee can choose to apply IFRS 16 using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. The Company plans to apply IFRS 16 at the date it becomes effective but has not yet selected a transition approach.
Upon the adoption of IFRS 16, the Company anticipates it will record a material balance of lease assets and associated lease liabilities related to leases with a term of 12 months or more on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 1, 2019. Due to the recognition of additional lease assets and liabilities, a higher amount of depreciation expense and interest on lease liabilities will be recognized under IFRS 16 as compared to the current standard. Additionally, a reduction in production and/or corporate administration costs is expected. Lastly, the Company expects a reduction in operating cash outflows with a corresponding increase in financing cash outflows under IFRS 16.
The Company is in the process of identifying and collecting data relating to existing agreements that may contain 'right-of-use' assets. These include land easements and service contracts that may contain embedded leases for property, plant and equipment. At this time, it is not possible for the Company to make reasonable quantitative estimates of the effects of the new standard. The Company estimates the time frame to develop and implement the accounting policies, estimates and processes (including the information technology systems) will extend into the latter part of 2018.
Significant judgements and estimates
The Company’s management makes judgements in its process of applying the Company’s accounting policies in the preparation of its Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, the preparation of the financial data requires that the Company’s management makes assumptions and estimates of the impacts of uncertain future events on the carrying amounts of the Company’s assets and liabilities at the end of the reporting period, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates as the estimation process is inherently uncertain. Estimates are reviewed on an ongoing basis based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant under the circumstances. Revisions to estimates and the resulting impacts on the carrying amounts of the Company’s assets and liabilities are accounted for prospectively.
In preparing the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company applied the critical judgements and estimates disclosed in notes 5 and 6 of its Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 , and the following critical judgments in applying accounting policies:

(a)
Revenue recognition as a result of adopting IFRS 15

Determination of performance obligations

The Company applied judgement to determine if a good or service that is promised to a customer is distinct based on whether the customer can benefit from the good or service on its own or together with other readily available resources and whether the good or service is separately identifiable. Based on these criteria, the Company determined the primary performance obligation relating to its sales contracts is the delivery of the bullion, doré and concentrates. Shipping and insurance services arranged by the Company for its concentrate sales customers that occur after the transfer of control are also considered to be performance obligations.
    
Transfer of control
    
Judgement is required to determine when transfer of control occurs relating to the sale of the Company's bullion, doré and concentrate to its customers. Management based its assessment on a number of indicators of control, which include, but are not limited to whether the Company has present right of payment, and whether the physical possession of the goods, significant risks and rewards and legal title have been transferred to the customer.

Variable consideration
    
Variable consideration should only be recognized to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company identified two variable components in the sales proceeds it receives from its concentrate sales. They include (i) adjustments to the final sales price based on differences between the original and final assay results relating to the quantity and quality of concentrate shipments and (ii) retroactive pricing adjustment based on new annual pricing terms. The Company applied judgement to determine the amount of variable consideration to be recognized during the period for which the likelihood of significant reversal is low.

Based on the Company's proficiency in its assaying process, evidenced by the insignificant amount of historical adjustments from the initial to final assays, the Company concluded the variability in consideration caused by assaying results is negligible. Therefore, the Company does not expect a significant amount of reversal in revenue related to assaying differences.


GOLDCORP    |   8


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



Negotiations for the upcoming year's pricing terms for lead and zinc concentrate contracts commence during the last quarter of the fiscal year and can extend through to the first half of the next year. If the new terms are not finalized prior to January 1 of the next year, previous year’s pricing continues to apply until the new terms are finalized, upon which, total sale proceeds and therefore revenue will be adjusted retroactively to reflect the new terms. The impact of the price negotiations did not result in significant adjustments in the past two fiscal years. Management estimated the impact of potential changes in treatment and refining charges and the percentage of metal payable for 2018's concentrate sales based on industry knowledge and the status of price negotiations through March 31, 2018. Based on this, Management concluded that the impact of the finalization of the 2018 concentrate pricing terms will not be significant and does not constrain the recognition of revenue during the period prior to finalization of the 2018 pricing.


3 .
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Operating results of operating segments are reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker ("CODM") to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance. The Company considers each individual operating mine site as a reportable operating segment for financial reporting purposes except for Alumbrera and Leagold. Alumbrera and Leagold are not considered to be reportable operating segments as their financial results do not meet the quantitative threshold required for segment disclosure purposes and are included in Other.
Assets in Other also include the Company's 100% interest in the Coffee Project, the Company's 50% interests in the NuevaUnión and the Norte Abierto projects, corporate assets and the Company's closed and inactive mines. Liabilities in Other include the Company's debt, its deferred payment obligation related to the acquisition of the Norte Abierto project, asset retirement obligations for closed and inactive mines and certain income taxes payable.
Significant information relating to the Company’s reportable operating segments is summarized in the tables below:
 
Revenues (a)(b)
Production costs
Depreciation
and depletion
Earnings (loss) from operations, associates and joint venture (b)(c)
Expenditures on mining interests
Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

Éléonore
$
86

$
88

$
67

$
61

$
34

$
32

$
(16
)
$
(6
)
$
17

$
29

Musselwhite
80

69

37

40

11

10

32

17

24

11

Porcupine
93

76

49

53

29

27

14

(6
)
28

14

Red Lake
81

66

55

47

21

21

2

(3
)
21

17

Peñasquito
329

356

181

193

80

72

66

90

129

73

Cerro Negro
177

121

72

52

71

54

29

14

19

16

Pueblo Viejo
139

122

51

47

24

9

65

66

15

9

Other  
42

146

38

103

9

33

(49
)
9

32

15

Attributable segment total
1,027

1,044

550

596

279

258

143

181

285

184

Excluding attributable amounts from associates and joint venture
(181
)
(162
)
(86
)
(76
)
(28
)
(12
)
(60
)
(47
)
(18
)
(4
)
Consolidated total
$
846

$
882

$
464

$
520

$
251

$
246

$
83

$
134

$
267

$
180


GOLDCORP    |   9


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



At March 31, 2018
Assets

Liabilities

Net Assets

Éléonore
$
2,717

$
278

$
2,439

Musselwhite
576

148

428

Porcupine
984

178

806

Red Lake
1,714

79

1,635

Peñasquito
8,477

3,108

5,369

Cerro Negro
3,189

515

2,674

Pueblo Viejo  
1,732


1,732

Other  
2,226

3,090

(864
)
Total
$
21,615

$
7,396

$
14,219

At December 31, 2017
Assets

Liabilities

Net Assets

Éléonore
$
2,735

$
273

$
2,462

Musselwhite
546

153

393

Porcupine
990

196

794

Red Lake
1,731

88

1,643

Peñasquito
8,370

3,089

5,281

Cerro Negro
3,285

531

2,754

Pueblo Viejo
1,746


1,746

Other  
2,282

3,171

(889
)
Total
$
21,685

$
7,501

$
14,184

(a)
The Company’s principal product is gold bullion which is sold primarily in the London spot market. Metal concentrate, containing both gold and by-product metals, is produced at Peñasquito and Alumbrera and is sold to third party smelters and traders. The Company’s consolidated revenues (excluding attributable share of revenues from Pueblo Viejo and Alumbrera) for the three months ended March 31 were derived from the following:
Three Months Ended March 31
xxxxxxxx 2018
xxxxxxxx 2017
Gold
$
620

73
%
$
664

75
%
Silver
81

10
%
100

11
%
Zinc
121

14
%
93

11
%
Lead
23

3
%
19

2
%
Copper
1

%
6

1
%
 
$
846

100
%
$
882

100
%

GOLDCORP    |   10


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



Certain of the Company's mines (including the Company's associates) supplemented their gold revenues with the sale of other metals as shown in the table below:
Three Months Ended March 31
 
 Peñasquito (1)

Cerro Negro

Pueblo  Viejo 

Other

Gold
2018
$
121

$
160

$
130

$
14

 
2017
$
173

$
109

$
116

$
48

Silver
2018
63

17

8


 
2017
65

12

6

23

Zinc
2018
121




 
2017
93




Lead
2018
23




 
2017
19




Copper
2018
1


1

11

 
2017
6



22

Molybdenum
2018



1

 
2017



1

Total
2018
$
329

$
177

$
139

$
26

 
2017
$
356

$
121

$
122

$
94

(1)  
For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 , Peñasquito's revenue related to provisional pricing adjustments on concentrate sales was not significant.
(b)
Intersegment sales and transfers are eliminated in the above information reported to the Company’s CODM. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 , intersegment purchases included $130 million and $8 million, respectively, of gold and silver ounces purchased from Pueblo Viejo ( 2017 – $116 million and $6 million, respectively) and revenues related to the sale of these ounces to external third parties were $130 million and $8 million, respectively ( 2017 – $116 million and $6 million, respectively).
(c)
A reconciliation of attributable segment total earnings from operations, associates and joint venture to the Company's earnings before taxes per the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Earnings is as follows:
 
2018

2017

Attributable segment total earnings from operations, associates and joint venture
$
143

$
181

Adjustment to account for Pueblo Viejo, NuevaUnión, Leagold and Alumbrera on an equity method basis
(60
)
(47
)
Gain on derivatives, net
5

5

Finance costs
(30
)
(36
)
Other income, net
13

19

Earnings before taxes
$
71

$
122



GOLDCORP    |   11


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



4 .
PRODUCTION COSTS
Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Raw materials and consumables
$
185

$
250

Salaries and employee benefits (a)
135

129

Contractors
89

106

Royalties
16

23

Transportation costs
14

11

Maintenance costs
10

8

Change in inventories
4

(33
)
Other (b)
11

26

 
$
464

$
520


(a)
Salaries and employee benefits exclude $16 million of salaries and employee benefits included in corporate administration in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2018 ( 2017 $12 million ).
(b)
Other included a write down of prior period costs of $12 million relating to Peñasquito oxide heap leach inventories recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

5 .
OTHER INCOME, NET

Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Finance income
$
9

$
10

Gains on sale of investments

2

Foreign exchange gain
7

21

Other
(3
)
(14
)
 
$
13

$
19




6 .
INCOME TAXES
Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Current income tax expense
$
59

$
70

Deferred income tax recovery
(55
)
(118
)
Income tax expense (recovery)
$
4

$
(48
)
The income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was 6% (2017 – negative 39%). The underlying effective tax rate for ordinary income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was 25% (2017 – 25%) after adjusting earnings before taxes and income tax expense (recovery) for:
(a)
the impact to earnings for non-deductible share based compensation expense of $7 million (2017 – $9 million), $nil of non-deductible reversals of impairment (2017 – $3 million), and $9 million of after-tax income from associates that are not subject to further income tax in the accounts of the Company (2017 – $60 million); and

(b)
the impact to taxes for changes in foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances and intra-group arrangements of a $16 million income tax recovery (2017 – $61 million), $4 million income tax expense for changes in foreign exchange rates on current tax balances (2017 – $4 million recovery), and $ 1 million income tax recovery for other items (2017 – $nil).



GOLDCORP    |   12


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



7 .
PER SHARE INFORMATION
(a)
Net earnings per share
Net earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was calculated based on basic and diluted net earnings of $67 million , ( 2017 $170 million ) and the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the calculation was based on the following:
 
Three Months Ended March 31
 
(in millions)
2018

2017

Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding
868

854

Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted share units
4

3

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding
872

857

The outstanding equity instruments that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but were not included in the calculation of diluted net earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2018 because they were anti-dilutive, were 6 million ( 2017 – 7 million) stock options.
(b)    Dividends declared
During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company declared dividends of $ 0.02 per share for total dividends of $ 17 million , respectively ( 2017 $0.02 per share for dividends of $17 million ).
During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company issued $ 3 million ( 2017 – $2 million) in common shares under the Company's Dividend Reinvestment Plan.


GOLDCORP    |   13


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



8 .
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

(a)    Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of the following:

 
At March 31
2018

At December 31
2017

Cash
$
85

$
184

Money market investments
38

2

 
$
123

$
186

(b)    The following table summarizes the decrease and increase in working capital during the three months ended March 31 :
    
 
2018

2017

Accounts receivable decrease (increase)
$
10

$
(20
)
Inventories decrease (increase)
3

(14
)
Sales and indirect taxes recoverable increase
(5
)
(23
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (decrease) increase
(40
)
15

Income taxes payable increase, net of income taxes receivable
25

19

Other
(1
)

Increase in working capital
$
(8
)
$
(23
)

(c)
The following table summarizes cash received and paid included in the Company's operating and investing activities during the three months ended March 31 :
Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Operating activities include the following cash received (paid):
 
 
Interest received
$
8

$
25

Interest paid
(18
)
(22
)
Income taxes refunded
1

9

Income taxes paid
(22
)
(49
)
Investing activities include the following cash (paid) received:
 
 
Net (purchases) proceeds of short-term investments and available-for-sale securities
 
 
    Purchases of short-term investments
$
(8
)
$
(3
)
    Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments
15

3

    Purchases of equity securities
(15
)
(40
)
    Proceeds from sale of equity securities

5

 
$
(8
)
$
(35
)


GOLDCORP    |   14


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



9 .
MINING INTERESTS – OWNED BY SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT OPERATION
 
Mining properties
 
 
 
Depletable   
Non-depletable
 
 
   
Reserves
and
resources
Reserves
and
resources
Exploration
potential
Plant and equipment (e)
Total
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
At January 1, 2018
$
13,296

$
5,832

$
5,258

$
6,738

$
31,124

Expenditures on mining interests (a)(b)(c)
129

51


123

303

Transfers and other movements
5



(14
)
(9
)
At March 31, 2018
13,430

5,883

5,258

6,847

31,418

Accumulated depreciation and depletion and impairment
 
 
 
 
 
At January 1, 2018
(5,350
)
(2,769
)
(2,343
)
(3,351
)
(13,813
)
Depreciation and depletion (d)
(162
)


(82
)
(244
)
Transfers and other movements



2

2

At March 31, 2018
(5,512
)
(2,769
)
(2,343
)
(3,431
)
(14,055
)
Carrying amount – At March 31, 2018
$
7,918

$
3,114

$
2,915

$
3,416

$
17,363

 
Mining properties
 
 
 
Depletable
Non-depletable
 
 
   
Reserves
and
resources
Reserves
and
resources
Exploration
potential
Plant and equipment (e)  
Total
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
At January 1, 2017
$
12,875

$
4,670

$
7,225

$
6,550

$
31,320

Acquisition of mining interest

529


2

531

Expenditures on mining interests
458

170


469

1,097

Removal of fully depreciated/depleted assets and disposals
(1,469
)
(1
)
(2
)
(295
)
(1,767
)
Transfers and other movements
1,432

464

(1,965
)
12

(57
)
At December 31, 2017
13,296

5,832

5,258

6,738

31,124

Accumulated depreciation and depletion and impairment
 
 
 
 
 
At January 1, 2017
(5,848
)
(2,510
)
(2,263
)
(3,134
)
(13,755
)
Depreciation and depletion
(654
)


(354
)
(1,008
)
Impairment reversal, net
(294
)
(259
)
(80
)
(136
)
(769
)
Removal of fully depreciated/depleted assets and disposals
1,463



275

1,738

Transfers and other movements
(17
)


(2
)
(19
)
At December 31, 2017
(5,350
)
(2,769
)
(2,343
)
(3,351
)
(13,813
)
Carrying amount – At December 31, 2017
$
7,946

$
3,063

$
2,915

$
3,387

$
17,311


GOLDCORP    |   15


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



A summary by property of the carrying amount of mining interests owned by subsidiaries and joint operation is as follows:
 
Mining properties
 
 
 
 
Depletable
Non-depletable
 
 
 
   
Reserves
and
resources
Reserves
and
resources
Exploration
potential
Plant and equipment (d)
At March 31
2018

At December 31
2017

Éléonore
$
1,586

$
85

$

$
905

$
2,576

$
2,596

Musselwhite
302

17

28

167

514

507

Porcupine
384

455


138

977

977

Red Lake
522

469

198

218

1,407

1,396

Coffee

441


1

442

434

Peñasquito
3,780

1,034

1,859

1,259

7,932

7,852

Cerro Negro
1,344

56

830

638

2,868

2,911

Norte Abierto

557


2

559

548

Corporate and other



88

88

90

 
$
7,918

$
3,114

$
2,915

$
3,416

$
17,363

$
17,311

(a)
Exploration, evaluation and project costs incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31 were as follows:

Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Total exploration, evaluation and project expenditures
$
29

$
21

Less: amounts capitalized to mining interests
(13
)
(13
)
Total exploration, evaluation and project costs recognized in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Earnings
$
16

$
8

(b)
Expenditures on mining interests include finance lease additions, capitalized borrowing costs and deposits on mining interests, and are net of investment tax credits and exclude capitalized reclamation and closure costs. The following is a reconciliation of total capitalized expenditures on mining interests to expenditures on mining interests in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Capitalized expenditures on mining interests including associates and joint venture
$
311

$
214

Interest paid
(14
)
(10
)
Increase in accrued expenditures
(30
)
(24
)
Expenditures on mining interests per Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
$
267

$
180

(c)
Expenditures on mining interests include capitalized borrowing costs incurred during the three months ended March 31 as follows:

Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Red Lake - Cochenour
$
6

$
6

Norte Abierto Project
5


Peñasquito - Pyrite Leach Project
3

1

Porcupine - Borden Project
1


 
$
15

$
7


GOLDCORP    |   16


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)




(d)
A reconciliation of total depreciation and depletion during the three months ended March 31 to depreciation and depletion recognized in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Earnings is as follows:

Three Months Ended March 31
2018

2017

Total depreciation and depletion
244

$
245

Less: amounts capitalized to mining interests

(1
)
Changes in amounts allocated to ending inventories
7

2

Total depreciation and depletion recognized in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Earnings
$
251

$
246

(e)
At March 31, 2018 , assets not yet ready for intended use, and therefore not yet being depreciated, included in the carrying amount of plant and equipment amounted to $ 566 million ( December 31, 2017 $512 million ).

10 .
MINING INTERESTS – INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURE
At March 31, 2018 , the Company had a 40% interest in Pueblo Viejo, a 50% interest in NuevaUnión, a 22.9% interest in Leagold (included in "Other") and a 37.5% interest in Alumbrera (included in "Other"). These investments are accounted for using the equity method and included in mining interests . The Company adjusts each associate and joint venture’s financial results, where appropriate, to give effect to uniform accounting policies.
The following table summarizes the change in the carrying amount of the Company's investments in associates and joint venture:
  
Pueblo Viejo (a)

NuevaUnión

Other (b)

Total

At January 1, 2018
$
1,746

$
919

$
71

$
2,736

Company’s share of net earnings of associates and joint venture
9



9

Capital investment

8


8

Return of capital investment
(25
)


(25
)
Other
2



2

At March 31, 2018
$
1,732

$
927

$
71

$
2,730

 
 
 
 
 
At January 1, 2017
$
1,123

$
884

$

$
2,007

Company’s share of net earnings of associates and joint venture (2)
142

2


144

Acquisition of interest in Leagold


71

71

Capital investment

33


33

Return of capital investment
(65
)


(65
)
Reversal of impairment
557



557

Other
(11
)


(11
)
At December 31, 2017
$
1,746

$
919

$
71

$
2,736

(1)
The Company's share of net earnings of associates and joint venture for the three months ended March 31, 2017 of $60 million included $33 million arising from the reduction of the provision related to funding Alumbrera's reclamation costs .
(a)
At March 31, 2018 , the carrying amount of the Company's share of shareholder loans to Pueblo Viejo was $507 million ( December 31, 2017 – $506 million), which is included in the Company's investments in associates and joint venture and is being accreted to the face value over the term of the loans. Included in other current assets of the Company was a total of $ 2 million ( December 31, 2017 – $4 million) in interest receivable relating to the shareholder loan.
(b)
Other associates include the Company's interest in Leagold which at March 31, 2018 had a quoted market value of $77 million ( December 31, 2017 – $80 million).

GOLDCORP    |   17


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



11 .
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED RISKS
(a)
Financial assets and liabilities by categories
At March 31, 2018
Amortized cost

FVTOCI (1)

Fair value through profit or loss ("FVTPL") (3)

Effective hedging instruments

Total

Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$

$

$
123

$

$
123

Short-term investments
40




40

Accounts receivable arising from sales of metal
1


102


103

Equity securities (3)

163



163

Derivative assets designated as hedging instruments



11

11

Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments


2


2

Other current and non-current financial assets
34




34

Total financial assets
$
75

$
163

$
227

$
11

$
476

Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Debt
$
(2,435
)
$

$

$

$
(2,435
)
Deferred payment obligation
(180
)



(180
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(538
)



(538
)
Other current and non-current financial liabilities
(254
)



(254
)
Total financial liabilities
$
(3,407
)
$

$

$

$
(3,407
)
(1)
Investments in equity securities were designated as FVTOCI upon initial recognition as the management of the equity securities portfolio is not part of the Company's core operations. As such, the financial results of the portfolio should not be reflected in the Company's net earnings. Securities in the portfolio are disposed of when they no longer meet the Company's long term investment strategy. During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company did not recognize any cumulative gain (loss) (2017 – gain of $2 million) on the sale of its equity securities.
(2)
The Company's investments in publicly traded entities include its equity securities portfolio and its interest in Leagold, which is accounted for using the equity method (note 10(b)) .
(3)  
The Company does not hold any financial instruments that are designated as FVTPL.




GOLDCORP    |   18


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



At December 31, 2017
Amortized cost

FVTOCI

FVTPL

Effective hedging instruments

Total

Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$

$

$
186

$

$
186

Short-term investments
48




48

Accounts receivable arising from sales of metal
3


110


113

Equity securities

178



178

Derivative assets designated as hedging instruments



2

2

Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments


1


1

Other current and non-current financial assets
30




30

Total financial assets
$
81

$
178

$
297

$
2

$
558

Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Debt
$
(2,483
)
$

$

$

$
(2,483
)
Deferred payment obligation
(182
)



(182
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(547
)



(547
)
Derivative liabilities designated as not hedging instruments


(2
)

(2
)
Other current and non-current financial liabilities
(257
)



(257
)
Total financial liabilities
$
(3,469
)
$

$
(2
)
$

$
(3,471
)

(b) Fair value information
(i)
Fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value
The levels in the fair value hierarchy into which the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized on the Condensed Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:
   
At March 31, 2018
 
At December 31, 2017
 
   
Level 1

Level 2

Level 1

Level 2

Cash and cash equivalents
$
123

$

$
186

$

Accounts receivable arising from sales of metal concentrates

102


110

Equity securities
163


178


Derivative assets designated as cash flow hedges

11


2

Derivative assets not designated as cash flow hedges

2


1

Derivative liabilities not designated as cash flow hedges



(2
)
At March 31, 2018 , there were no financial assets and liabilities measured and recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three months ended March 31, 2018 . At March 31, 2018 , there were no financial assets or liabilities measured and recognized on the Condensed Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value that would be categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
 

GOLDCORP    |   19


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



(ii)
Valuation methodologies used in the measurement of fair value for Level 2 financial assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable arising from sales of metal concentrates:
The Company’s metal concentrate sales contracts are subject to provisional pricing with the final selling price adjusted at the end of the quotational period. At the end of each reporting period, the Company’s accounts receivable relating to these contracts are marked-to-market based on quoted forward prices for which there exists an active commodity market.
Derivative assets and liabilities:
The Company's derivative assets and liabilities were comprised of investments in warrants and foreign currency and commodity forward contracts . The fair values of the warrants are calculated using an option pricing model which utilizes a combination of quoted prices and market-derived inputs, including volatility estimates. Foreign currency and metal forward contracts are valued using a combination of quoted prices and market-derived inputs including credit spreads.
(iii)
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities not already measured at fair value
At March 31, 2018 , the fair values of the Company's notes payable and deferred payment obligation, as compared to the carrying amounts, were as follows:

 
Level
Input
Carrying amount (1)
Fair value
$1.0 billion notes  
1
Closing price
$
1,005

$
1,061

$1.5 billion notes  
1
Closing price
995

999

Deferred payment obligation
2
4.75% (2)
180

180

(1)  
Includes accrued interest payable.
(2)  
Represents the Company's current rate of borrowing for instruments of a similar term.

At March 31, 2018 , the carrying amounts of the Company's short-term investments, other current financial assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, term loans, and other current financial liabilities were considered to be reasonable approximations of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
(c)
Financial instruments and related risks
The Company manages its exposure to financial risks, including credit risk, liquidity risk, currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk, in accordance with its Financial Risk Management Policy. The Company's exposures to financial risks and how the Company manages each of those risks are described in note 26(e) to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 . There were no significant changes to the Company's exposures to those risks or to the Company's management of its exposures during the three months ended March 31, 2018 except as noted below.
(i)    Liquidity risk
During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company generated cash flows from operations, one of the Company's main sources of liquidity, of $ 271 million ( 2017 – $ 227 million ). At March 31, 2018 , Goldcorp held cash and cash equivalents of $ 123 million ( December 31, 2017 $186 million ) and short-term investments of $ 40 million ( December 31, 2017 $48 million ). At March 31, 2018 , the Company's working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, was negative $ 94 million ( December 31, 2017 – negative $ 112 million ). Despite the increase in cash flow from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year, the Company’s working capital was negative at March 31, 2018 as the Company has reinvested its cash in its expansion projects at Peñasquito and Musselwhite and used funds to reduce its debt during the quarter.
On March 14, 2018, the Company entered into three one-year non-revolving term loan agreements, totaling $400 million. The term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.65%, reset monthly, and are repayable before March 14, 2019 without penalty. The proceeds from the term loans were used to repay the $500 million 2.125% note that was due on March 15, 2018.
At March 31, 2018 , the balance outstanding on the revolving credit facility was $50 million ( December 31, 2017 – $nil) with $2.95 billion available for the Company's use ( December 31, 2017 – $3.0 billion). Certain of the Company's borrowings are subject to various financial and general covenants with which the Company was in compliance at March 31, 2018 .
At March 31, 2018 , the Company had letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $ 420 million ( December 31, 2017 $420 million ) of which $ 323 million ( December 31, 2017 – $323 million) represented guarantees for reclamation obligations. The Company's capital

GOLDCORP    |   20


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



commitments for the next twelve months amounted to $ 362 million at March 31, 2018 , including the Company's funding obligation for the Norte Abierto project for the next twelve months.
(ii)    Market risk
Currency risk
During the three months ended March 31, 2018 , the Company recognized a net foreign exchange gain of $7 million ( 2017 gain of $21 million ), and a net foreign exchange loss of $25 million in income tax expense on income taxes receivable (payable) and deferred income taxes ( 2017 gain of $68 million ). Based on the Company’s net foreign currency exposures at March 31, 2018 , depreciation or appreciation of applicable foreign currencies against the US dollar would have resulted in the following decrease or increase in the Company's net earnings:
At March 31, 2018
Possible exposure (1)
Impact on earnings excluding currency exposure related to taxes
Impact on earnings from foreign exchange exposure related to taxes
Canadian dollar
10%
$
10

$
102

Mexican peso
20%
17

82

Argentine peso
15%
4

44


(1 ) Calculated based on fluctuations of foreign exchange rates during the past fiscal year.

12 .
CONTINGENCIES
Due to the size, complexity and nature of the Company’s operations, various legal, tax, environmental and regulatory matters are outstanding from time to time. By their nature, contingencies will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The assessment of contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events. While the outcomes of these matters are uncertain, based upon the information currently available and except as noted in note 30(a) of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company does not believe that these matters in aggregate will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations. In the event that management’s estimate of the future resolution of these matters changes, the Company will recognize the effects of these changes in its Consolidated Financial Statements in the appropriate period relative to when such changes occur. 


GOLDCORP    |   21


First Quarter Report – 2018
(In millions of United States dollars, except where noted)



CORPORATE OFFICE
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
 
 
Park Place
Toronto Stock Exchange: G
Suite 3400 – 666 Burrard Street
New York Stock Exchange: GG
Vancouver, BC V6C 2X8 Canada
 
Tel:      (604) 696-3000
TRANSFER AGENT
Fax:     (604) 696-3001
 
www.goldcorp.com
AST Trust Company (Canada)
 
1066 West Hastings Street, Suite 1600
TORONTO OFFICE
Vancouver, BC V6E 3X1 Canada
 
Toll free in Canada and the US: (800) 387-0825
Suite 3201 – 130 Adelaide Street West
Outside of Canada and the US: (416) 682-3860
Toronto, ON M5H 3P5 Canada
inquiries@canstockta.com
Tel:      (416) 865-0326
www.canstockta.com
Fax:     (416) 359-9787
 
 
AUDITORS
MEXICO OFFICE
 
 
Deloitte LLP
Paseo de las Palmas 425-15
Vancouver, BC
Lomas de Chapultepec
 
11000 Mexico, D.F.
INVESTOR RELATIONS
Tel:      52 (55) 5201-9600
 
 
Etienne Morin
GUATEMALA OFFICE
Toll free:    (800) 567-6223
 
Email:        info@goldcorp.com
5ta avenida 5-55 zona 14 Europlaza
 
Torre 1 Nivel 6 oficina 601
REGULATORY FILINGS
Guatemala City
 
Guatemala, 01014
The Company’s filings with the Ontario Securities Commission
Tel:      (502) 2329-2600
can be accessed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
 
 
ARGENTINA OFFICE
The Company’s filings with the US Securities and
 
Exchange Commission can be accessed on EDGAR
Avda. Leandro N. Alem 855, Piso 27
at www.sec.gov.
C1001AAD Capital Federal
 
Buenos Aires, Argentina
 
Tel:      54 114 323 7000
 
 
 
CHILE OFFICE
 
 
 
Avenida Apoquindo 4501, Oficina 


 
703 Las Condes, Santiago, Chile 

 
Tel: 56 2 2898 9300
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


GOLDCORP    |   22



Exhibit 99.3
FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, David A. Garofalo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp Inc. , certify the following:

1.
Review: I have reviewed the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report and interim Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) (together, the “interim filings”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2018.

2.
No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

3.
Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

4.
Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

5.
Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings,

(a)    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

(i)    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

(ii)    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

(b)    designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

5.1
Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

5.2    N/A.

5.3
N/A.

6.
Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2018 and ended on March 31, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.


Date: April 25, 2018
 
 
 
/s/ “David A. Garofalo”
 
Signature: David A. Garofalo
 
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




Exhibit 99.4
FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Jason Attew, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development of Goldcorp Inc ., certify the following:

1.
Review: I have reviewed the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report and interim Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) (together, the “interim filings”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2018.

2.
No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

3.
Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

4.
Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

5.
Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings,

(a)    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

(i)    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

(ii)    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

(b)
designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

5.1
Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

5.2    N/A.

5.3
N/A.

6.
Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2018 and ended on March 31, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.
Date: April 25, 2018
 
 
 
/s/ "Jason Attew"
 
Signature: Jason Attew
 
Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development