UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 

(Mark One)

x   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                 to                                

Commission File Number: 1-12522

EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware
13-3714474
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


c/o Monticello Casino and Raceway
Route 17B, P.O. Box 5013
Monticello, New York
12701
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)


(845) 807-0001
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes   ý No   ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes   ¨ No   ¨
 
 
 

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
 
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
   
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   ¨   No   ý
 
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, as of May 14, 2010 was 69,479,340.
 
 
 

 
INDEX
 
   
PAGE NO.
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
     
 
     
     
     
Item 5 Other Information 18
     
     
 
 
 
ii


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for per share data)
 
   
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
   
December 31,
2009
 
     ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
     Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 47,032     $ 50,080  
     Restricted cash
    3,437       2,890  
     Accounts receivable, net
    1,535       1,759  
     Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    2,791       2,595  
               Total current assets
    54,795       57,324  
Property and equipment, net
    28,617       28,877  
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,166 in 2010 and $2,063 in 2009
    1,775       1,878  
Other assets
    1,626       1,342  
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 86,813     $ 89,421  
                 
      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
      Senior convertible notes
  $ 65,000     $ 65,000  
      Accounts payable
    2,114       2,401  
      Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    5,284       6,472  
               Total current liabilities
    72,398       73,873  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Stockholders’ equity:
               
     Preferred stock, 5,000 shares authorized; $0.01 par value -
               
          Series A, $1,000 per share liquidation value, none issued and outstanding
    ---       ---  
          Series B, $29 per share liquidation value, 44 shares issued and outstanding
    ---       ---  
          Series E, $10 per share redemption value, 1,731 shares issued and outstanding
    6,855       6,855  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 95,000 shares authorized, 69,479 and 69,134 shares issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively
    695       691  
     Additional paid-in capital
    118,876       117,632  
     Accumulated deficit
    (112,011 )     (109,630 )
               Total stockholders’ equity
    14,415       15,548  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 86,813     $ 89,421  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
1

 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per share data) (Unaudited)
 
   
Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
REVENUES:
           
Gaming
  $ 12,356     $ 12,199  
Racing
    2,585       2,267  
Food, beverage and other
    1,262       939  
Gross revenues
    16,203       15,405  
Less: Promotional allowances
    (742 )     (691 )
Net revenues
    15,461       14,714  
                 
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
               
Gaming
    9,790       9,765  
Racing
    2,195       1,985  
Food, beverage and other
    456       362  
Selling, general and administrative
    2,519       2,492  
Stock-based compensation
    1,040       412  
Depreciation
    303       311  
Total costs and expenses
    16,303       15,327  
                 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
    (842 )     (613 )
                 
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    (102 )     (102 )
Interest expense
    (1,301 )     (1,391 )
Interest income
    2       11  
                 
NET LOSS
    (2,243 )     (2,095 )
Undeclared dividends on preferred stock
    (388 )     (388 )
                 
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES
  $ (2,631 )   $ (2,483 )
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
    69,256       33,945  
                 
Loss per common share, basic and diluted
  $ (0.04 )   $ (0.07 )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
2

 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
 

 
   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
           
Net loss
  $ (2,243 )   $ (2,095 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    303       311  
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    102       102  
Stock-based compensation
    1,040       412  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Restricted cash –NYS Lottery and Purse Accounts
    (565 )     (595 )
Accounts receivable
    224       (135 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    (196 )     406  
Accounts payable
    (288 )     (422 )
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    (1,188 )     (1,507 )
Other assets
    (283 )     (155 )
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
    (3,094 )     (3,678 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Purchases of property and equipment
    (43 )     ---  
Restricted cash - Racing capital improvement
    18       (26 )
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
    (25 )     (26 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    35       ---  
Proceeds from exercise of option matching rights
    36       ---  
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
    71       ---  
                 
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    (3,048 )     (3,704 )
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
    50,080       9,687  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
  $ 47,032     $ 5,983  
                 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
               
Cash paid for interest during the period
  $ 2,600     $ 2,691  
                 
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND
               
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Common stock issued in settlement of preferred stock dividends
  $ 137     $ 111  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
3

 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Note A.  Summary of Business and Basis for Presentation
 
Basis for Presentation
 
The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes as of  March 31, 2010 and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited and include the accounts of Empire Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Empire,” the “Company,” “us,” “our” or “we”).
 
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all the information and the footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements.  These condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in our opinion, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods.  These condensed consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.  The results of operations for the interim period are not indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
 
Going Concern
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis that contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.  Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to fulfill our obligations with respect to $65 million of 5 ½% senior convertible notes (“the Notes”).  Under the terms of the Notes, we had an obligation to repurchase any of the Notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount on July 31, 2009; to the extent that the Holder, as defined under the indenture dated July 26, 2004 (the “Indenture”), delivered a properly executed Put Notice, as defined under the Indenture.  We sought a judicial determination, which we refer to as the “Action,” in the Supreme Court of New York, Sullivan County (the “Court”), against the beneficial owners of the Notes, as well as The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) and the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (the “Trustee,” and together with DTC, the “Defendants”) that (1) no Holder, delivered an executed Put Notice to the office of the Trustee within the lawfully mandated time for exercise of a Holder’s put rights under the Indenture prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and that (2) the three entities that gave the purported notice of default may not and have not accelerated the Notes or invoked certain other consequences of a default.  On April 8, 2010, we received the Decision, Order and Judgment (the “Decision”) from the Court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  The Decision provides that the Court has determined that the Defendants properly exercised the option requiring us to repurchase the Notes, that we are in default under the Notes with respect to our failure to repurchase the Notes on July 31, 2009 and that we must now repurchase the Notes.  On May 11, 2010, we filed a notice of appeal with the Third Judicial Department of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the “Appellate Division”) to appeal the Decision. We are unable to predict the length of time it will take for the Appellate Division, or the State of New York Court of Appeals, to issue a final, non-appealable judgment.  In the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised, we would not have an immediate source of funds from which to pay our obligations under the Notes, and no assurance can be made that other sources of financing will be available at such time on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, to satisfy our obligations under the Notes. We are working with our financial advisor, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and our legal counsel to consider our available financial and legal alternatives in the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised.
 
In addition, we have continuing net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities.  These additional conditions also raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
 
 
4

 
Nature of Business
 
We currently own and operate Monticello Casino and Raceway, a video gaming machine (“VGM”) and harness horse racing facility located in Monticello, New York, 90 miles Northwest of New York City.  At Monticello Casino and Raceway, we operate approximately 1,090 VGMs as an agent for the New York State Lottery and conduct pari-mutuel wagering through the running of live harness horse races, the import simulcasting of harness and thoroughbred horse races from racetracks across the world and the export simulcasting of our races to offsite pari-mutuel wagering facilities.
 
On March 23, 2009, we entered into an agreement (the “Concord Agreement”) with Concord Associates, L.P. (“Concord”), pursuant to which we (or a wholly-owned subsidiary reasonably acceptable to Concord) shall be retained by Concord Empire Raceway Corp. (“Raceway Corp.”), a subsidiary of Concord, to provide advice and general managerial oversight with respect to the operations at the harness track to be constructed at that certain parcel of land located in the Town of Thompson, New York and commonly known as the Concord Hotel and Resort (the “Concord Property”).  The Concord Agreement has a term of forty years.  The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Concord Agreement is to take place on the date that Concord or its subsidiary secures and closes on (but not necessarily funds under) financing in the minimum aggregate amount of $500 million (including existing equity) from certain third-party lenders in connection with the development of the harness track and certain gaming facilities on the Concord Property.  In the event that the closing of the Concord Agreement has not occurred on or before July 31, 2010, the Concord Agreement may be terminated by either Concord or us by written notice.  No assurance can be made that the financing required as a condition to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Concord Agreement will be obtained by Concord.
 
In the past, we have also made efforts to develop a 29.31 acre parcel of land adjacent to Monticello Casino and Raceway as the site for the development of a Class III casino and may pursue additional commercial and entertainment projects on the remaining 200 acres of land owned by the Company that encompass the site of our current gaming and racing facility.  Currently, either an agreement with a Native American tribe, together with certain necessary federal and state regulatory approvals, or an amendment to the New York State Constitution would be required for us to move forward with our efforts to develop a Class III casino.
 
As used herein, Class III casino means a facility authorized to conduct a full range of gaming activities including slot machines, on which the outcome of play for each machine is based upon randomness, and various table games including, but not limited to, poker, blackjack and craps.  VGMs are similar to slot machines, but they are electronically controlled from a central station and the procedure for determining winners is based on algorithms that distribute wins based on fixed odds, rather than mechanical or other methods designed to produce a random outcome for each play.
 
We operate through three principal subsidiaries, Monticello Raceway Management, Inc. (“Monticello Raceway Management”), Monticello Casino Management, LLC (“Monticello Casino Management”) and Monticello Raceway Development Company, LLC (“Monticello Raceway Development”).  Currently, only Monticello Raceway Management has operations which generate revenue.

VGM Operations .  We currently operate a 45,000 square foot VGM facility at Monticello Casino and Raceway.  VGMs are electronic gaming devices that allow patrons to play electronic versions of various lottery games of chance and are similar in appearance and feel to traditional slot machines.  VGM operations at Monticello Casino and Raceway began on June 30, 2004.  At March 31, 2010, the number of VGMs in operation was 1,090 compared to 1,587 at March 31, 2009.
 
Revenues derived from our VGM operations consist of VGM revenues and related food and beverage concession revenues.  Each of the VGMs is owned by the State of New York.  By statute, for a period of five years which began on April 1, 2008, 42% of gross VGM revenue is distributed to us.  Following that five-year period, 40% of the first $50 million, 29% of the next $100 million and 26% thereafter of gross VGM revenue will be distributed to us. Gross VGM revenues consist of the total amount wagered at our VGMs, less prizes awarded.   The statute also provides a vendor’s marketing allowance for racetracks operating video lottery programs of 10% on the first $100 million of net revenues generated and 8% thereafter.  The legislation authorizing the implementation of VGMs at Monticello Casino and Raceway expires in 2013.
 
 
5

 
Raceway Operations .  Monticello Casino and Raceway offers pari-mutuel wagering, live harness racing and simulcasting from various harness and thoroughbred racetracks across the country.  Monticello Casino and Raceway derives its revenue principally from (i) wagering on live races run at our facility; (ii) fees from wagering at out-of-state locations on races simulcast from our facility using export simulcasting; (iii) revenue allocations, as prescribed by law, from betting activity at Off Track Betting facilities located in New York State; (iv) wagering at our facility on races broadcast from out-of-state racetracks using import simulcasting; and (v) admission fees, program and racing form sales, the sale of food and beverages and certain other ancillary activities.
 
Note B.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Accounts receivable .  Accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect.  When needed, an allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on information on the collectability of specific accounts.  Accounts are considered past due or delinquent based on contractual terms, how recently payments have been received and our judgment of collectability.  In the normal course of business, we settle wagers for other racetracks and are exposed to credit risk.  These wagers are included in accounts receivable.  Account balances are written off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.  As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $763,000.
 
Loss per common share .  We compute basic loss per share by dividing loss applicable to common shares by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the year.  Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution of earnings that could occur if securities or contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the loss of the entity.  Since the effect of outstanding options, warrants and option matching rights is anti-dilutive with respect to losses, they have been excluded from our computation of loss per common share.  Therefore, basic and diluted losses per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were the same.
 
The following table shows the approximate number of common stock equivalents outstanding at March 31, 2010 and 2009 that could potentially dilute basic income per share in the future, but were not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
 
   
Outstanding at March 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Options
    8,137,000       3,039,000  
Warrants
    ---       250,000  
Option Matching Rights
    7,387,000       ---  
Shares to be issued upon conversion of convertible debt
    5,175,000       5,175,000  
Total
    20,699,000       8,464,000  

Fair value .  In the first quarter of 2008, we adopted the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for financial assets and liabilities.  This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures.  This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost).    As permitted in 2008, we chose not to elect the fair value option as prescribed by FASB for our financial assets and liabilities that had not been previously carried at fair value.  Our financial instruments are comprised of current assets and current liabilities, which included the Notes.  Current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.
 
Estimates and assumptions .  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.    Actual results may differ from estimates.
 
 
6

 
Reclassifications .  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
 
Recent accounting pronouncements.
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No.  2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (the “Update”).  The Update provides amendments to FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10 that require entities to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers.  In addition the Update requires entities to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).  The disclosures related to Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements are effective for us in 2010 and the disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for us in 2011.   The Update requires new disclosures only, and has no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-16, “Entertainment - Casinos (Topic 924): Accruals for Casino Jackpot Liabilities.” The ASU codifies the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 09-F, "Casino Base Jackpot Liabilities." This ASU amends the FASB ASC to clarify that an entity should not accrue jackpot liabilities, or portions thereof, before a jackpot is won if the entity can avoid paying the jackpot. Jackpots should be accrued and charged to revenue when an entity has the obligation to pay the jackpot. The guidance in the ASU applies to both base and progressive jackpots. The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments should be applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. We do not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2010-16 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

Note C.  Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are comprised of the following:
 
   
March 31,
2010
   
December 31,
2009
   
(in thousands)
Liability for horseracing purses
  $ 2,043     $ 1, 984  
Accrued interest
    867       2,167  
Accrued payroll
    587       466  
Accrued other
    1,787       1,855  
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
  $ 5,284     $ 6,472  

Note D.  Senior Convertible Notes
 
On July 26, 2004, we issued $65 million of 5 ½% Notes, which are currently convertible into approximately 5.2 million shares of common stock, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of certain events.  The Notes were issued with a maturity date of July 31, 2014 and each Holder, as defined under the Indenture, had the right to demand that we repurchase the Notes at par plus accrued interest on July 31, 2009.  Interest is payable semi-annually on January 31 and July 31.
 
The Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness.  The Notes are secured by our tangible and intangible assets and by a pledge of the equity interests of each of our subsidiaries and a mortgage on our property in Monticello, New York.
 
 The Notes initially accrued interest at an annual rate of 5 ½%, which would be maintained with the occurrence of the “Trigger Event,” as defined under the Indenture.  Since the events that constitute the “Trigger Event” had not occurred within the time period allotted under the Indenture, the Notes have accrued interest from and after July 31, 2005 at an annual rate of 8%.  The holders of the Notes have the option to convert the Notes into shares of our common stock at any time prior to maturity, redemption or repurchase.  The initial conversion rate is 72.727 shares per each $1,000 principal amount of the Notes.  This conversion rate was equivalent to an initial conversion price of $13.75 per share.  Since the Trigger Event did not occur on or prior to July 31, 2005, the initial conversion rate per each $1,000 principal amount of the Notes was reset to $12.56 per share.  This rate would result in the issuance of 5,175,159 shares upon conversion.
 
 
7

 
In August 2009, we commenced a declaratory judgment action against the beneficial owners of the Notes, as well as DTC and the Trustee, which we refer to together as the Defendants, in the Court, pursuant to which we sought a judicial determination that (1) no Holder, as defined under the Indenture, delivered a Put Notice to the office of the Trustee within the lawfully mandated time for exercise of a Holder’s put rights under the Indenture prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and that (2) Plainfield Special Solutions Master Fund Limited (“Plainfield”), Highbridge International LLC (“Highbridge”) and Whitebox Advisors LLC (“Whitebox”) may not and have not accelerated the Notes or invoked certain other consequences of a default. In October 2009, we entered into a stipulation in connection with the Action.  Pursuant to a stipulation that we entered into in August 2009, we agreed to discontinue our claims against all beneficial owners of the Notes who executed the stipulation (the “Consenting Defendants”), who represent substantially all of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes, including Plainfield, Highbridge and Whitebox, without prejudice, and Plainfield, Highbridge and Whitebox agreed to withdraw the notices of default and acceleration of the Notes that they sent to us on August 3 and August 11, 2009. The Consenting Defendants further agreed to (i) be bound by any final non-appealable judgment with respect to the declaratory judgment sought by us against the Defendants, and (ii) not to commence any action or proceeding concerning the subject matter of the declaratory judgment until there has been a final non-appealable judgment with respect to the declaratory judgment sought by us.
 
On October 16, 2009, the Defendants answered the complaint, denying that we are entitled to the determination sought in the Action.  On October 27, 2009, the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking a determination that the Notes were properly put to us for repurchase on July 31, 2009. On December 3, 2009, we filed opposition papers and a cross-motion for summary judgment, requesting that the Court determine that the Holders of the Notes have failed to properly exercise any option to require that we repurchase the Notes by reason of a Holder put right exercisable prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and, as a consequence, that we are not in default of the Indenture.
 
On November 5, 2009, the Trustee filed (i) an amended answer, (ii) a counterclaim against us and (iii) a third party complaint against Alpha Monticello, Inc., Alpha Casino Management Inc., Mohawk Management, LLC, and Monticello Raceway Management, as guarantors of our obligation under the Notes. The amended answer again denied that we are entitled to the determinations which we seek in the Action.  The counterclaim and third party complaint seek (a) a declaration that we are in default under the Indenture for failure to repurchase the Notes upon the purported exercise of the Holders’ put right under the Indenture and that the Trustee has properly accelerated the Notes in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, and (b) damages, including all unpaid principal and interest on the Notes, prejudgment interest and costs and expenses in bringing the Action, including attorney’s fees.  On February 1, 2010, the Company and the Guarantors filed a reply to the counterclaim and answer to the third party complaint denying liability and asserting certain affirmative defenses.
 
On April 8, 2010, we received the Decision from the Court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  The Decision provides that the Court has determined that the Defendants properly exercised the option requiring us to repurchase the Notes, that we are in default under the Notes with respect to our failure to repurchase the Notes on July 31, 2009 and that we must now repurchase the Notes.   On May 11, 2010, we filed a notice of appeal with the Appellate Division to appeal the Decision. We are unable to predict the length of time it will take for the Appellate Division, or the State of New York Court of Appeals, to issue a final, non-appealable judgment.  In the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised, we would not have an immediate source of funds from which to pay our obligations under the Notes, and no assurance can be made that other sources of financing will be available at such time on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, to satisfy our obligations under the Notes. We are working with our financial advisor, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and our legal counsel to consider our available financial and legal alternatives in the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised.
 
 
8

 
A failure to have repurchased the Notes when required would result in an “Event of Default” under the Indenture and could result in a cross-default under any other credit agreement to which we may be a party.  In addition, an event that may constitute a “Change of Control” under the Indenture may also be an “Event of Default” under any credit agreement or other agreement governing future debt.  These events permit the lenders under such credit agreement or other agreement to accelerate the debt outstanding thereunder and, if such debt is not paid, to enforce security interests in the collateral securing such debt or result in our becoming involved in an insolvency proceeding.
 
Due to the “Event of Default,” the accrued interest increases to an annual rate of 9% on the overdue principal as of August 4, 2009.  If we are unsuccessful in our appeal of the Decision, the default interest payable at March 31, 2010 is approximately $428,000.  This represents the default interest due from August 4, 2009, the date of the purported occurrence of the Event of Default, through March 31, 2010. Subsequent to March 31, 2010, the estimated default interest accrual is approximately $54,000 per month.
 
We recognized interest expense associated with the Notes of approximately $1.3 million in each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

Note E.  Stockholders’ Equity
 
Stock-based compensation expense is approximately $1.0 million and $412,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  As of March 31, 2010, there was approximately $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation awards granted under our plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting period of three years.  This expected cost does not include the impact of any future stock-based compensation awards.
 
Options that were granted to four directors, who have resigned in March 2009, would have expired on the date of termination or in thirty days based on the equity incentive plan under which the options were issued, but were extended to the original expiration dates set forth for the respective options.  The modification resulted in stock-based compensation expense of approximately $123,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
 
On February 23, 2010 we authorized issuance of 74,705 shares of our common stock as payment of dividends due for the year ended December 31, 2009 on our Series B preferred stock.  The approximate value of these shares when issued was $137,000.
 
On March 9, 2009, we authorized issuance of 124,610 shares of our common stock as payment of dividends due for the year ended December 31, 2008 on our Series B preferred stock.  The approximate value of these shares when issued was $111,000.
 
Note F.  Concentration
 
One debtor, Hawthorne Race Course, Inc., represented approximately 10%  of the total outstanding accounts receivable as of March 31, 2010 and two debtors, New York Off-Track Betting Corporation and New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority, represented approximately 12% and 11%, respectively, of the total outstanding accounts receivable as of December 31, 2009.
 
Note G.  Commitments and Contingencies
 
Legal Proceedings
 
Empire Resorts, Inc. v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and The Depository Trust Company
 
On August 5, 2009, we filed a declaratory judgment action against the beneficial owners of the Notes, as well as the DTC and the Trustee, which we refer to together as the Defendants.  In the complaint, we sought a judicial determination that (1) no Holder, as defined under the Indenture, delivered a Put Notice to the office of the Trustee within the lawfully mandated time for exercise of a Holder’s put rights under the Indenture prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and that (2) Plainfield, Highbridge and Whitebox may not and have not accelerated the Notes or invoked certain other consequences of a default.  In October 2009, we entered into a stipulation in connection with the Action.  Pursuant to the stipulation, we agreed to discontinue our claims against all beneficial owners of the Notes who executed the stipulation, which we refer to as the Consenting Defendants, who represent substantially all of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes, including Plainfield, Highbridge and Whitebox, without prejudice, and Plainfield, Highbridge and Whitebox agreed to withdraw the notices of default and acceleration of the Notes that they sent to us on August 3 and August 11, 2009. The Consenting Defendants have further agreed to (i) be bound by any final non-appealable judgment with respect to the declaratory judgment sought by us against the Defendants, and (ii) not to commence any action or proceeding concerning the subject matter of the declaratory judgment until there has been a final non-appealable judgment with respect to the declaratory judgment sought by us.
 
 
9

 
On October 16, 2009, the Defendants answered the complaint, denying that we are entitled to the determination sought in the Action.  On October 27, 2009, the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking a determination that the Notes were properly put to us for repurchase on July 31, 2009. On December 3, 2009, we filed opposition papers and a cross-motion for summary judgment, requesting that the Court determine that the Holders of the Notes have failed to properly exercise any option to require that we repurchase the Notes by reason of a Holder put right exercisable prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and, as a consequence, that we are not in default of the Indenture.
 
On November 5, 2009, the Trustee filed (i) an amended answer, (ii) a counterclaim against us and (iii) a third party complaint against Alpha Monticello, Inc., Alpha Casino Management Inc., Mohawk Management, LLC, and Monticello Raceway Management, as guarantors of our obligation under the Notes. The amended answer again denied that we are entitled to the determinations which we seek in the Action.  The counterclaim and third party complaint seek (a) a declaration that we are in default under the Indenture for failure to repurchase the Notes upon the purported exercise of the Holders’ put right under the Indenture and that the Trustee has properly accelerated the Notes in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, and (b) damages, including all unpaid principal and interest on the Notes, prejudgment interest and costs and expenses in bringing the action, including attorney’s fees.  On February 1, 2010, the Company and the Guarantors filed a reply to the counterclaim and answer to the third party complaint denying liability and asserting certain affirmative defenses.
 
On April 8, 2010, we received the Decision from the Court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  The Decision provides that the Court has determined that the Defendants properly exercised the option requiring us to repurchase the Notes, that we are in default under the Notes with respect to our failure to repurchase the Notes on July 31, 2009 and that we must now repurchase the Notes.  On May 11, 2010, we filed a notice of appeal with the Appellate Division to appeal the Decision. We are unable to predict the length of time it will take for the Appellate Division, or the State of New York Court of Appeals, to issue a final, non-appealable judgment.  In the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised, we would not have an immediate source of funds from which to pay our obligations under the Notes, and no assurance can be made that other sources of financing will be available at such time on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, to satisfy our obligations under the Notes. We are working with our financial advisor, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and our legal counsel to consider our available financial and legal alternatives in the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised.
 
Empire Resorts, Inc. v. Joseph E. Bernstein
 
On January 7, 2010, we filed a complaint against Joseph E. Bernstein, our former Chief Executive Officer, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.  In the complaint, we are seeking injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages and a judgment declaring that Mr. Bernstein is bound by the non-competition restrictions in his employment agreement. Prior to the expiration of his employment agreement, Mr. Bernstein had made numerous financial demands on us.  After we refused his demands, Mr. Bernstein issued a 17-page letter to the New York State Racing and Wagering Board making numerous accusations against us and certain of our directors (the “R&W Letter”), which we maintain are false and baseless.  In the R&W Letter, Mr. Bernstein reveals our confidential and proprietary information and discloses confidential attorney-client privileged communications.  We are cooperating fully with the New York State Racing and Wagering Board with respect to their investigation into this matter.  We are seeking relief from Mr. Bernstein for his alleged: (i) breach of his employment agreement caused by his dissemination of our confidential information in contravention of the terms of the employment agreement as a result of his widespread dissemination of the R&W Letter, (ii) breach of his fiduciary duties to us caused by his improper use of and dissemination of the R&W Letter, (iii) violation of his good faith and loyalty obligations to us as a result of, among other things, disclosing confidential information and attorney-client privileged information of us as a result of his dissemination of the R&W Letter, and (iv) tortious interference with prospective business relations caused by Mr. Bernstein’s attempted interference with our business relations with the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.  Prior to issuance of the R&W Letter, we received a letter from Mr. Bernstein’s counsel alleging that we breached Mr. Bernstein’s employment agreement and summarizing Mr. Bernstein’s claims against the Company.  Mr. Bernstein filed a counterclaim against the Company and certain third party defendants in April 2010.  On May 13, 2010, Mr. Bernstein, the Company and the third party defendants entered into a settlement agreement providing for the dismissal of all claims with prejudice.
 
 
10

 
Other Proceedings
 
We are a party from time to time to various other legal actions that arise in the normal course of business.  In the opinion of management, the resolution of these other matters will not have a material and adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Note H.  Subsequent Events
 
On April 8, 2010, we received the Decision from the Court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  The Decision provides that the Court has determined that the Defendants properly exercised the option requiring us to repurchase the Notes, that we are in default under the Notes with respect to our failure to repurchase the Notes on July 31, 2009 and that we must now repurchase the Notes.  On May 11, 2010, we filed a notice of appeal with the Appellate Division to appeal the Decision. We are working with our financial advisor, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and our legal counsel to consider our available financial and legal alternatives in the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised.
 
On May 13, 2010, the Company, Kien Huat Realty III Limited (“Kien Huat”), Kok Thay Lim, Au Fook Yew, G. Michael Brown, and Joseph Bernstein entered into a settlement agreement, dated as of May 11, 2010 (the “Settlement Agreement”), providing for the dismissal of the action captioned Empire Resorts, Inc. v. Joseph E. Bernstein with prejudice and mutual releases by the Company, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Au Fook Yew and G. Michael Brown, on the one hand, and Joseph Bernstein, on the other of any and all claims.  In consideration of the release by Mr. Bernstein of any and all claims against the Company, the Company agreed pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement to pay Mr. Bernstein consideration of $1.5 million, inclusive of legal fees, and to issue to Mr. Bernstein warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3.25 million shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share, as follows: (i)  250,000 shares with an expiration date of May 10, 2015; (ii) 1 million shares with an expiration date of May 10, 2015; and (iii) 2 million shares with an expiration date of May 10, 2020, which may be exercised on a cashless basis and cannot be exercised until the warrants to purchase 1.25 million shares described in clauses (i) and (ii) above have been exercised in full.
 
Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Bernstein is not released from and will continue to be obligated to comply with the confidentiality provisions of his employment agreement with the Company.  In addition, the Settlement Agreement restricts Mr. Bernstein’s ability to perform services for, hold office as an officer or director or like positions in or communicate with the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe for a period of 10 years.  The Settlement Agreement also contains certain other confidentiality, non-disparagement and non-interference provisions.
 
In the event that Mr. Bernstein materially breaches any terms of the Settlement Agreement, he will be obligated to immediately return to the Company $250,000 and the warrant for the purchase of 2 million shares of the Company’s common stock, provided that the other parties to the Settlement Agreement have not materially breached the terms of the agreement.

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read together with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  These forward-looking statements generally relate to our strategies, plans and objectives for future operations and are based upon management’s current plans and beliefs or estimates of future results or trends.  Forward-looking statements also involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not restricted to, the risks and uncertainties described in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.  Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict.
 
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations.  Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we will not update these forward-looking statements, even if our situation changes in the future.  We caution the reader that a number of important factors discussed herein, and in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could affect our actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements.
 
 
11

 
Liquidity and Going Concern
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.  Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to fulfill our obligations with respect to $65 million of 5 ½% senior convertible notes (“the Notes”).  Under the terms of the Notes, we had an obligation to repurchase any of the Notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount on July 31, 2009; to the extent that the Holder, as defined under the indenture dated July 26, 2004 (the “Indenture”), delivered a properly executed Put Notice, as defined under the Indenture.  We sought a judicial determination, which we refer to as the “Action,” in the Supreme Court of New York, Sullivan County (the “Court”), against the beneficial owners of the Notes, as well as The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) and the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (the “Trustee,” and together with DTC, the “Defendants”) that (1) no Holder, delivered an executed Put Notice to the office of the Trustee within the lawfully mandated time for exercise of a Holder’s put rights under the Indenture prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and that (2) the three entities that gave the purported notice of default may not and have not accelerated the Notes or invoked certain other consequences of a default.  On April 8, 2010, we received the Decision, Order and Judgment (the “Decision”) from the Court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  The Decision provides that the Court has determined that the Defendants properly exercised the option requiring us to repurchase the Notes, that we are in default under the Notes with respect to our failure to repurchase the Notes on July 31, 2009 and that we must now repurchase the Notes.  On May 11, 2010, we filed a notice of appeal with the Third Judicial Department of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the “Appellate Division”) to appeal the Decision. We are unable to predict the length of time it will take for the Appellate Division, or the State of New York Court of Appeals, to issue a final, non-appealable judgment.  In the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised, we would not have an immediate source of funds from which to pay our obligations under the Notes, and no assurance can be made that other sources of financing will be available at such time on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, to satisfy our obligations under the Notes. We are working with our financial advisor, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and our legal counsel to consider our available financial and legal alternatives in the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised.
 
Overview
 
Empire Resorts, Inc. (“Empire,” the “Company,” “us,” “our” or “we”) was organized as a Delaware corporation on March 19, 1993, and since that time has served as a holding company for various subsidiaries engaged in the hospitality and gaming industries.
 
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Monticello Raceway Management, Inc. (“Monticello Raceway Management”), we currently own and operate Monticello Casino and Raceway, a video gaming machine (“VGM”) and harness horseracing facility located in Monticello, New York, 90 miles Northwest of New York City.  At Monticello Casino and Raceway, we currently operate 1,090 VGMs as an agent for the New York State Lottery and conduct pari-mutuel wagering through the running of live harness horse races, the import simulcasting of harness and thoroughbred horse races from racetracks across the country and the export simulcasting of our races to offsite pari-mutuel wagering facilities.
 
We are concentrating on improving our cash flow, current operations at Monticello Raceway Management and restructuring our balance sheet with the infusion of new capital from our Investor, Kien Huat Realty III Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the Isle of Man (“Kien Huat”).  We have an agreement, subject to certain conditions, with Concord Empire Raceway Corp. (“Raceway Corp.”), a subsidiary of Concord Associates, L.P., to provide advice and general managerial oversight with respect to the operations at a harness to be constructed at that certain parcel of land located in the Town of Thompson, New York and commonly known as the Concord Hotel and Resort.  No assurance can be given that the conditions to the closing of the transaction will be satisfied in order to complete the transaction, as planned.
 
We have been working since 1996 to develop a Class III casino on a site 29.31 acre owned by us adjacent to our Monticello, New York facility.  As used herein, Class III gaming means a full casino including slot machines, on which the outcome of play is based upon randomness, and various table games including, but not limited to, poker, blackjack and craps.  Initially, this effort was pursued through agreements with various Indian tribes.  Our most recent efforts were pursuant to agreements with the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, which expired pursuant to their terms on December 31, 2007.  We were advised, however, that on January 4, 2008, the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe received a letter from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) denying the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe’s request to take 29.31 acres into trust for the purpose of building a Class III gaming facility to be located at Monticello Casino and Raceway.  The basis for the denial, a newly promulgated “commutability rule,” is reported to be under review by the U.S. Department of the Interior.
 
 
12

 
Effective August 5, 2009 and continuing through August 4, 2010, with a performance evaluation after six months by the New York State Lottery, a subsidized VGM free play pilot program (“Free Play”) was implemented at Monticello Casino and Raceway.  As a result, Monticello Casino and Raceway intends to use this Free Play to build its player loyalty, increase its database of active and profitable players and to reactivate dormant players.  Monticello Casino and Raceway will be authorized to deduct promotional free play from video gaming revenue (net win) up to 10% of the prior month’s net win.  Parameters for determining Free Play success will be mutually agreed on by the New York State Lottery and Monticello Casino and Raceway, by evaluating prior revenue trends compared to current trends, or other measurements as agreed upon between New York State Lottery and Monticello Casino and Raceway.
 
Competition
 
We continue to face significant competition for our VGM operation from a VGM facility at Yonkers Raceway, and to a lesser extent, two slot machine facilities that have opened in Pennsylvania and one, operated by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, is within 65 miles of our Monticello property.  The Yonkers facility, which is much closer to New York City, has a harness horseracing facility, approximately 5,500 VGMs, food and beverage outlets and other amenities. In August 2009, the New York State Lottery approved a pilot test period for us and one other New York State racino authorizing the use of tax-free VGM play for our guests. The pilot program was to last six months and the New York State Lottery was to evaluate the success of the pilot program by February 4, 2010. The use of tax-free VGM play provided us the opportunity to reward our guests based on their level of VGM play and to offer promotions that can compete with the offerings of our competitors located in Pennsylvania.  On February 4, 2010, we received authorization to continue the use of tax-free VGM play for another six months.
 
In January 2010, the Pennsylvania legislature authorized and its Governor approved table games in its existing casino facilities. The bill authorizes all table games, including blackjack, craps, roulette, baccarat, and poker at thoroughbred and harness racetracks with slot-machine facilities and stand-alone slot-machine parlors. In addition, the bill authorized the granting of credit to guests of the Pennsylvania casinos. We currently anticipate that table games will be operational in Pennsylvania’s casinos in the latter part of the third or beginning of the fourth quarter of this year. Both Pennsylvania casinos that we compete against have indicated their commitment to install and offer table games at their facility. This bill augmented the legislation passed in July 2004, whereby Pennsylvania legalized the operation of up to 61,000 slot machines at 14 locations throughout the state.  As of March 2010, there were nine casinos in operation within Pennsylvania, with seven located at racing tracks.  One such development is the Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, which has approximately 2,500 slot machines.  The Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs opened in January 2007 in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, approximately 75 miles southwest of Monticello.  In addition, in October 2007, the Mount Airy Casino Resort opened with approximately 2,500 slot machines, a hotel, spa and a golf course.  The Mount Airy Casino Resort is located in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, approximately 60 miles southwest of Monticello.
 
Results of Operations
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009.
 
Revenues .  Net revenues increased approximately $700,000 (5 %) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.  Revenue from VGM operations increased by approximately $157,000 (1%); revenue from racing operations increased by approximately $318,000  (14 %) and food, beverage and other revenue increased by approximately $323,000 (34%).  Complimentary expenses (“Promotional Allowances”) increased by approximately $51,000 (7%), including an increase in food promotions.
 
 
13

 
Our number of daily visits increased approximately 14%; and the average daily win per unit increased from an adjusted $124.32 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $125.95 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (1%).  The adjusted average daily win per unit for the three months ended March 31, 2009 reflects the reduction in the number of machines in service from 1,587 to 1,090 in the three months ended March 31, 2010.  Our VGM hold percentage was 7.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  VGM revenues are recorded net of tax-free VGM play of approximately $1.3 million and $0 in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in tax-free VGM play was associated with a New York State Lottery pilot program that commenced in August 2009. The pilot program was evaluated by the New York State Lottery at the end of six-month period and was extended another six months until August 4, 2010. During the period from the inception of the pilot program, our rate of reduction of VGM net win has declined. We will continue to use this program in conjunction with our marketing promotional programs and increased television advertising in 2010 to increase our awareness in our primary markets and to regain market share.
 
Racing revenue increased primarily because of approximately $254,000 received from Off-Track Betting Corporations (“OTBs”) in payment of amounts previously contested by the OTBs and $45,000 in stall rental income.
 
 Food, beverage and other revenue increased primarily as a result of food promotions.
 
Promotional Allowances increased by approximately $51,000 (7%), primarily due to an increase in food promotions of approximately $323,000; offset by decreases in taxable free play of approximately $205,000 and players club awards of approximately $76,000.
 
Gaming costs .  Gaming (VGM) costs remained constant at approximately $9.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  Lottery and other commissions increased approximately $167,000 due to increased VGM revenue. This increase was offset by decreases in payroll costs of approximately $124,000 and other cost savings of approximately $17,000.
 
Racing costs .  Racing costs increased by approximately $210,000  (11 %) to approximately $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.  This increase is a result of the horsemen’s share of approximately $155,000 from higher racing revenues and various other costs of approximately $107,000 offset by cost savings of approximately $52,000 in payroll due to a reduction in the number of employees required for our current business volume.
 
Food, beverage and other costs .  Food, beverage and other costs increased approximately $94,000 (26%) to approximately $456,000 primarily as a result of increased food revenue.  Food and beverage costs were 36% and 39% of food and beverage revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses .  Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $27,000 (1%) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.  This increase was a result of direct marketing expenses of approximately $370,000, primarily consisting of promotional prize expenses, television advertising, and direct mail expense. These increases were offset by payroll savings of approximately $338,000.
 
Stock-based compensation expense .  The increase in stock-based compensation of approximately $628,000 was primarily a result of options granted to directors during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
 
Interest expense and income .  Interest expense decreased approximately $90,000 (6%) as a result of us satisfying  our line of credit in December 2009.  Interest income decreased by approximately $9,000 as a result of lower rates during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Net cash used in operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $3.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively.  The decrease of approximately $584,000 was primarily a result of the decrease in the net loss after the adjustments for non-cash items during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
 
 
14

 
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $71,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.  This increase is a result of proceeds received for the exercise of stock options and option matching rights.
 
ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices.  We do not have any financial instruments held for trading or other speculative purposes and do not invest in derivative financial instruments, interest rate swaps or other investments that alter interest rate exposure.  We invest our excess cash primarily in short term U.S. Treasury Funds. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, an increase or decrease by 1% in market interest rates would not have a significant impact on the total value of our portfolio as of March 31, 2010. Accordingly, while changes in interest rates could decrease interest income, we do not believe that an interest rate change would not have a significant impact on our operations.
 
We do not have exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, as we do not transact business in international markets and are not a party to any material non-U.S. dollar-denominated contracts.
 
We do not use derivative financial instruments nor do we enter into any futures or forward commodity contracts since we do not have significant market risk exposure with respect to commodity prices.
 
ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.  Management believes, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
 
We carried out an evaluation as of March 31, 2010 under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to timely alert them to any material information (including our consolidated subsidiaries) that must be included in our periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
 
Changes in Our Financial Reporting Internal Controls.
 
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
15

 
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
Empire Resorts, Inc. v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and The Depository Trust Company
 
On August 5, 2009, we filed a declaratory judgment action against the beneficial owners of the Notes, as well as DTC and the Trustee, which we refer to together as the Defendants.  In the complaint, we sought a judicial determination that (1) no Holder, as defined under the Indenture, delivered a Put Notice to the office of the Trustee within the lawfully mandated time for exercise of a Holder’s put rights under the Indenture prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and that (2) Plainfield Special Solutions Master Fund Limited (“Plainfield”), Highbridge International LLC (“Highbridge”) and Whitebox Advisors LLC (“Whitebox”) may not and have not accelerated the Notes or invoked certain other consequences of a default. In October 2009, we entered into a stipulation in connection with the Action.  Pursuant to the stipulation, we agreed to discontinue our claims against all beneficial owners of the Notes who executed the stipulation (the “Consenting Defendants”), who represent substantially all of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes, including Plainfield, Highbridge and Whitebox, without prejudice, and Plainfield, Highbridge and Whitebox agreed to withdraw the notices of default and acceleration of the Notes that they sent to us on August 3 and August 11, 2009. The Consenting Defendants further agreed to (i) be bound by any final non-appealable judgment with respect to the declaratory judgment sought by us against the Defendants, and (ii) not to commence any action or proceeding concerning the subject matter of the declaratory judgment until there has been a final non-appealable judgment with respect to the declaratory judgment sought by us.
 
On October 16, 2009, the Defendants answered the complaint, denying that we are entitled to the determination sought in the Action.  On October 27, 2009, the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking a determination that the Notes were properly put to us for repurchase on July 31, 2009. On December 3, 2009, we filed opposition papers and a cross-motion for summary judgment, requesting that the Court determine that the Holders of the Notes have failed to properly exercise any option to require that we repurchase the Notes by reason of a Holder put right exercisable prior to the close of business on July 31, 2009, and, as a consequence, that we are not in default of the Indenture.
 
On November 5, 2009, the Trustee filed (i) an amended answer, (ii) a counterclaim against us and (iii) a third party complaint against Alpha Monticello, Inc., Alpha Casino Management Inc., Mohawk Management, LLC, and Monticello Raceway Management, as guarantors of our obligation under the Notes. The amended answer again denied that we are entitled to the determinations which we seek in the Action.  The counterclaim and third party complaint seek (a) a declaration that we are in default under the Indenture for failure to repurchase the Notes upon the purported exercise of the Holders’ put right under the Indenture and that the Trustee has properly accelerated the Notes in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, and (b) damages, including all unpaid principal and interest on the Notes, prejudgment interest and costs and expenses in bringing the Action, including attorney’s fees.  On February 1, 2010, the Company and the Guarantors filed a reply to the counterclaim and answer to the third party complaint denying liability and asserting certain affirmative defenses.
 
On April 8, 2010, we received the Decision from the Court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  The Decision provides that the Court has determined that the Defendants properly exercised the option requiring us to repurchase the Notes, that we are in default under the Notes with respect to our failure to repurchase the Notes on July 31, 2009 and that we must now repurchase the Notes.  On May 11, 2010, we filed a notice of appeal with the Appellate Division to appeal the Decision. We are unable to predict the length of time it will take for the Appellate Division, or the State of New York Court of Appeals, to issue a final, non-appealable judgment.  In the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised, we would not have an immediate source of funds from which to pay our obligations under the Notes, and no assurance can be made that other sources of financing will be available at such time on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, to satisfy our obligations under the Notes. We are working with our financial advisor, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and our legal counsel to consider our available financial and legal alternatives in the event that a final non-appealable ruling is issued declaring that the right to demand repayment of the Notes had been validly exercised.
 
 
16

 
Empire Resorts, Inc. v. Joseph E. Bernstein
 
On January 7, 2010, we filed a complaint against Joseph E. Bernstein, our former Chief Executive Officer, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.  In the complaint, we are seeking injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages and a judgment declaring that Mr. Bernstein is bound by the non-competition restrictions in his employment agreement. Prior to the expiration of his employment agreement, Mr. Bernstein had made numerous financial demands on us.  After we refused his demands, Mr. Bernstein issued a 17-page letter to the New York State Racing and Wagering Board making numerous accusations against us and certain of our directors (the “R&W Letter”), which we maintain are false and baseless.  In the R&W Letter, Mr. Bernstein reveals our confidential and proprietary information and discloses confidential attorney-client privileged communications.  We are cooperating fully with the New York State Racing and Wagering Board with respect to their investigation into this matter.  We are seeking relief from Mr. Bernstein for his alleged: (i) breach of his employment agreement caused by his dissemination of our confidential information in contravention of the terms of the employment agreement as a result of his widespread dissemination of the R&W Letter, (ii) breach of his fiduciary duties to us caused by his improper use of and dissemination of the R&W Letter, (iii) violation of his good faith and loyalty obligations to us as a result of, among other things, disclosing confidential information and attorney-client privileged information of us as a result of his dissemination of the R&W Letter, and (iv) tortious interference with prospective business relations caused by Mr. Bernstein’s attempted interference with our business relations with the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.  Prior to issuance of the R&W Letter, we received a letter from Mr. Bernstein’s counsel alleging that we breached Mr. Bernstein’s employment agreement and summarizing Mr. Bernstein’s claims against the Company.  Mr. Bernstein filed a counterclaim against the Company and certain third party defendants in April 2010.  On May 13, 2010, Mr. Bernstein, the Company and the third party defendants entered into a settlement agreement providing for the dismissal of all claims with prejudice.
 
ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS
 
If it is determined that the right to demand repayment of the notes has been validly exercised, we may not have an immediate source of repayment for our obligations under the Notes.
 
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon a determination by a court of competent jurisdiction that we did not have the obligation to repay the full principal amount of $65 million due under the Notes on July 31, 2009, and/or our ability to arrange financing to fulfill our obligations under the Notes.
 
On June 30, 2009, pursuant to the Indenture, we furnished the written notice required to be delivered by us to the Trustee of the time and manner under which each holder could elect to require us to purchase the Notes under the Indenture.  As contemplated by the Indenture, we included with the notice the written form to be completed, signed (with signature guaranteed), and delivered by each holder of the Notes to the Trustee before close of business on July 31, 2009 to require us to purchase the Notes.  We requested, but never received, from the Trustee copies of any forms delivered to it by which any election was made for us to purchase the Notes or any part thereof.  Neither the Trustee nor any holder furnished to us any originals or copies of any such signed forms which had to be completed, signed and delivered to the Trustee by close of business on July 31, 2009 to require us to purchase the Notes.  As the forms required to be completed, signed, and delivered by July 31, 2009 were not completed, signed and delivered by then, we are not obligated to purchase and pay for any Notes before their maturity on July 31, 2014.  On August 3, 2009, we received a notice from three entities, asserting that they were beneficial holders of the Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $48,730,000, and that we were in default under the Indenture by not purchasing the Notes on July 31, 2009.  On August 5, 2009, we instituted a declaratory judgment seeking a declaration confirming that (i) the holders of the Notes failed to properly exercise the Put Right contained in the Indenture in respect of any of the Notes and (ii) the three entities that gave the purported notice of default are not, therefore, entitled to invoke, and have not invoked, the rights and remedies available upon the occurrence of a default under the Indenture.  On April 8, 2010, we received the Decision from the Court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  The Decision provides that the Court has determined that the Defendants properly exercised the option requiring us to repurchase the Notes, that we are in default under the Notes with respect to our failure to repurchase the Notes on July 31, 2009 and that we must now repurchase the Notes. 
 
 
17

 
If the Appellate Division, or another court of competent jurisdiction, issues a non-appealable final judgment holding that the right to demand repayment of the Notes has been validly exercised, we would not have an immediate source of repayment for our obligations under the Notes.  It is anticipated that our current operations will not provide sufficient cash flow to repay these obligations at maturity, if we are required to do so.  A failure to have repurchased the Notes when required would result in an Event of Default under the Indenture.  Accordingly, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon a determination that we did not have the obligation to repurchase our Notes on July 31, 2009, and/or our ability to arrange financing to fulfill our obligations under the Notes, and no assurance can be made that financing necessary to fulfill our obligations under the Notes will be available on commercially reasonable terms, if it all.  Moreover, future efforts to arrange financing to fulfill our obligations under the Notes may involve the issuance of additional shares of our capital stock, which may dilute stockholder investment.
 
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
 
On May 13, 2010, the Company, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Au Fook Yew, G. Michael Brown, and Joseph Bernstein entered into a settlement agreement, dated as of May 11, 2010 (the “Settlement Agreement”), providing for the dismissal of the action captioned Empire Resorts, Inc. v. Joseph E. Bernstein with prejudice and mutual releases by the Company, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Au Fook Yew and G. Michael Brown, on the one hand, and Joseph Bernstein, on the other of any and all claims.  In consideration of the release by Mr. Bernstein of any and all claims against the Company, the Company agreed pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement to pay Mr. Bernstein consideration of $1.5 million, inclusive of legal fees, and to issue to Mr. Bernstein warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3.25 million shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share, as follows: (i)  250,000 shares with an expiration date of May 10, 2015; (ii) 1 million shares with an expiration date of May 10, 2015; and (iii) 2 million shares with an expiration date of May 10, 2020, which may be exercised on a cashless basis and cannot be exercised until the warrants to purchase 1.25 million shares described in clauses (i) and (ii) above have been exercised in full.
 
Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Bernstein is not released from and will continue to be obligated to comply with the confidentiality provisions of his employment agreement with the Company.  In addition, the Settlement Agreement restricts Mr. Bernstein’s ability to perform services for, hold office as an officer or director or like positions in or communicate with the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe for a period of 10 years.  The Settlement Agreement also contains certain other confidentiality, non-disparagement and non-interference provisions.
 
In the event that Mr. Bernstein materially breaches any terms of the Settlement Agreement, he will be obligated to immediately return to the Company $250,000 and the warrant for the purchase of 2 million shares of the Company’s common stock, provided that the other parties to the Settlement Agreement have not materially breached the terms of the agreement.
 
Copies of the Settlement Agreement and the Common Stock Purchase Warrants granted by the Company to Mr. Bernstein pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement are attached hereto as Exhibits 10.1 and 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference. The foregoing summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Settlement Agreement and the Common Stock Purchase Warrants.
 
ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS
 
4.1
Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated May 11, 2010, by and between the Company and Joseph Bernstein.
   
4.2
Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated May 11, 2010, by and between the Company and Joseph Bernstein.
   
4.3
Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated May 11, 2010, by and between the Company and Joseph Bernstein.
   
10.1
Settlement Agreement and Release, dated as of May 11, 2010, by and among the Company, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Au Fook Yew, G. Michael Brown, and Joseph Bernstein.
   
31.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
18

 
SIGNATURES
 
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
   
Empire Resorts, Inc.
     
Dated:  May 17, 2010
 
/s/ Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
19

 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
4.1
Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated May 11, 2010, by and between the Company and Joseph Bernstein.
   
4.2
Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated May 11, 2010, by and between the Company and Joseph Bernstein.
   
4.3
Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated May 11, 2010, by and between the Company and Joseph Bernstein.
   
10.1
Settlement Agreement and Release, dated as of May 11, 2010, by and among the Company, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Au Fook Yew, G. Michael Brown, and Joseph Bernstein.
   
31.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 4.1
 
EXECUTION VERSION


Warrant No. 10003

COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

To Purchase 250,000 Shares of Common Stock of
 

 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
 

THE WARRANTS AND THE SHARES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE OF THE WARRANTS HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), OR ANY STATE OR OTHER SECURITIES LAW AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (i) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR (ii) UPON RECEIPT BY THE COMPANY AN OPINION OF COUNSEL THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT.

THIS COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT (the “ Warrant ”) certifies that, for value received, JOSEPH E. BERNSTEIN and each transferee of this Warrant   (the “ Holder ”), is entitled, upon the terms and subject to the limitations on exercise and the conditions hereinafter set forth, at any time on or after the date hereof (the “ Initial Exercise Date ”) and on or prior to the close of business on May 10, 2015 (the “ Termination Date ”) but not thereafter, to subscribe for and purchase from EMPIRE RESORTS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), up to two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) shares (the “ Warrant Shares ”) of common stock, par value $0.01 per share of the Company (the “ Common Stock ”).  The purchase price of one (1) share of Common Stock under this Warrant shall be equal to the Exercise Price, as defined in Section 1(c) .
 
Section 1.                              Exercise.
 
(a)             Exercise of Warrant .  The Holder shall have the right at any time or from time to time on or after the Initial Exercise Date and on or before the Termination Date to exercise all or any part of this Warrant by (i) delivery to the Company of a duly executed facsimile copy of the Notice of Exercise Form annexed hereto (or such other office or agency of the Company as it may designate by notice in writing to the registered Holder at the address of such Holder appearing on the books of the Company) together with this Warrant; and (ii) within ten (10) Business Days of the date said Notice of Exercise is delivered to the Company, the Company shall have received payment of the aggregate Exercise Price of the Warrant Shares thereby purchased by wire transfer of immediately available funds or cashier’s check drawn on a United States bank.  In the event this Warrant is exercised in part, the Company shall issue a new Warrant, which shall be dated as of the date of this Warrant, covering the number of Warrant Shares in respect of which this Warrant shall not have been exercised.  The Company shall deliver any objection to any Notice of Exercise Form within two (2) Business Days of receipt of such notice.  In the event of any dispute or discrepancy with respect to whether this warrant has been exercised, the records of the Company shall be controlling and determinative in the absence of manifest error.  The Company acknowledges and agrees that it may not raise any defense, setoff or counterclaim regarding the exercise of this Warrant or the transfer of this Warrant in accordance with its terms other than with respect to a failure to pay the exercise price.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Warrant, in the event that (i) the Company reasonably determines, in its sole discretion, that it is required to withhold income tax or employment tax upon the exercise of this Warrant and (ii) the Company notifies the Holder in writing that the Company is required to withhold income or employment tax within two (2) Business Days from the receipt by the Company of the Notice of Exercise Form, then the Holder shall pay such withholding tax to the Company in cash along with the Exercise Price (in which case this Warrant shall be considered properly exercised).
 
 
 

 
 
(b)             Expiration of Warrant .  This Warrant shall expire and cease to be of any force or effect on the Termination Date.
 
(c)             Exercise Price .  The exercise price at which one (1) Warrant Share shall be purchasable upon exercise of this Warrant shall be $2.00 (the “ Exercise Price ”).
 
(d)            Mechanics of Exercise.
 
i.             Authorization of Warrant Shares .  The Company covenants that all Warrant Shares which may be issued upon the exercise of the purchase rights represented by this Warrant will, upon exercise of the purchase rights represented by this Warrant, be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and free from all taxes, liens and charges created by the Company in respect of the issue thereof (other than taxes in respect of any transfer occurring contemporaneously with such issue).
 
ii.             Delivery of Certificates Upon Exercise .  The Company shall be required to deliver certificates for the Warrant Shares subject to the exercise of this Warrant, which shall be transmitted by the transfer agent of the Company to the Holder by physical delivery to the address specified by the Holder in the Notice of Exercise within three (3) Business Days from the delivery to the Company of the Notice of Exercise Form, surrender of this Warrant (if required) and payment of the aggregate Exercise Price as set forth above.  This Warrant shall be deemed to have been exercised on the date the Exercise Price is received by the Company.  The Warrant Shares which are subject to an exercise of this Warrant shall be deemed to have been issued, and Holder or any other person so designated to be named therein shall be deemed to have become a holder of record thereof for all purposes, as of the date the Warrant has been exercised by payment to the Company of the Exercise Price and all taxes required to be paid by the Holder, if any, pursuant to Section 1(d)(iv) prior to the issuance of such shares, have been paid.
 
 
2

 
 
iii.             No Fractional Shares or Scrip .  No fractional shares of Common Stock or scrip representing fractional shares shall be issued upon the exercise of this Warrant.  As to any fraction of a share which Holder would otherwise be entitled to purchase upon such exercise, the Company shall at its election, either pay a cash adjustment in respect of such final fraction in an amount equal to such fraction multiplied by the VWAP on the date of exercise or round up to the next whole share.  “ VWAP ” means, for any date, the daily volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for such date (or the nearest preceding date) on the principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded or quoted as reported by Bloomberg Financial L.P. (based on a Trading Day from 9:30 a.m. (New York City time) to 4:02 p.m. (New York City time)) or if the Common Stock is not traded or quoted, as determined by the Board of Directors in good faith.
 
iv.             Charges, Taxes and Expenses .  Certificates representing the shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the partial or complete exercise of this Warrant shall be made without charge to the Holder, and the Company shall bear the cost of any issue or transfer tax or other incidental expense in respect of the issuance of such certificates, and such certificates shall be issued in the name of the Holder or in such name or names as may be directed by the Holder; provided , however , that in the event that this Warrant or the certificates representing the shares of Common Stock which are issued upon the partial or complete exercise of this Warrant are to be re-issued in a name other than the name of the Holder, the Company may require, as a condition to such re-issuance, the payment of a sum sufficient to reimburse it for any issue or transfer tax incidental thereto, and the Company shall have first received the original Warrant or stock certificates which are to be re-issued, along with duly prepared, executed and certified assignment documentation acceptable to the Company.  Prior to re-issuing this Warrant in a name other than the Holder, the Company shall have also first received a completed and duly executed Assignment Form in the form attached hereto.
 
Section 2.                             Certain Adjustments.
 
(a)             Stock Dividends and Splits .  If the Company shall at any time prior to the expiration of this Warrant subdivide its outstanding Common Stock, by split-up or otherwise, or combine its outstanding Common Stock, or issue additional shares of its capital stock in payment of a stock dividend in respect of its Common Stock, the number of shares issuable on the exercise of the unexercised portion of this Warrant shall forthwith be proportionately increased in the case of a subdivision or stock dividend, or proportionately decreased in the case of a combination, and the Exercise Price then applicable to shares covered by the unexercised portion of this Warrant shall forthwith be proportionately decreased in the case of a subdivision or stock dividend, or proportionately increased in the case of a combination.  In the event a decrease in the Exercise Price reduces the Exercise Price below the par value of the Common Stock, the Company shall use its best efforts to reduce the par value to an amount less than the Exercise Price as adjusted.
 
 
3

 
 
(b)             Reclassifications; Reorganizations .  In case of any reclassification, capital reorganization, or change of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (other than as a result of a subdivision, combination or in kind dividend), or in case of any consolidation of the Company with, or merger of the Company into, another corporation or other business organization (other than a consolidation or merger in which the Company is the continuing corporation and which does not result in any reclassification or change of the outstanding shares of Common Stock), or in case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or other business organization of the property of the Company as an entirety or substantially as an entirety, at any time prior to the expiration of this Warrant, then, as a condition of such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance, lawful provision shall be made, and duly executed documents evidencing the same from the Company or its successor shall be delivered to the holder of this Warrant, so that the holder of this Warrant shall have the right prior to the expiration of this Warrant to purchase, at a total price not to exceed the price payable upon the exercise of the unexercised portion of this Warrant, the kind and amount of securities and property receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance by a holder of the number of Warrant Shares issuable on the unexercised portion of the Warrant which might have been purchased by the holder of this Warrant immediately prior to such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance, and in any such case appropriate provisions (including without limitation, provisions for the adjustment of the number of Warrant Shares purchasable upon exercise of this Warrant) shall thereafter be applicable in relation to any shares of stock, and other securities and property thereafter deliverable upon exercise hereof.
 
Section 3.                             Transfer of Warrant.
 
(a)             Transferability .  Subject to compliance with any applicable securities laws and the conditions set forth in Section 3(c) below, this Warrant and all rights hereunder may be transferred, in whole or in part.  Any such transfer shall occur upon surrender of this Warrant at the principal office of the Company or its designated agent, together with a written assignment of this Warrant substantially in the form attached hereto duly executed by the Holder or its agent or attorney and funds sufficient to pay any transfer taxes payable upon the making of such transfer.  Upon such surrender and, if required, such payment, the Company shall execute and deliver a new Warrant or Warrants in the name of the assignee or assignees and in the denomination or denominations specified in such instrument of assignment, and shall issue to the assignor a new Warrant evidencing the portion of this Warrant not so assigned, and this Warrant shall promptly be cancelled.  A Warrant, if properly assigned in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Warrant, may be exercised by a new holder for the purchase of Warrant Shares without having a new Warrant issued.
 
(b)             New Warrants .  This Warrant may be divided or combined with other Warrants upon presentation hereof at the aforesaid office of the Company, together with a written notice specifying the names and denominations in which new Warrants are to be issued, signed by the Holder or its agent or attorney.  Subject to compliance with Section 3(a) , as to any transfer which may be involved in such division or combination, the Company shall execute and deliver a new Warrant or Warrants in exchange for the Warrant or Warrants to be divided or combined in accordance with such notice.
 
 
4

 
 
(c)             Transfer Restrictions .  If, at the time of the surrender of this Warrant in connection with any transfer of this Warrant, the transfer of this Warrant shall not be registered pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act and under applicable state securities or blue sky laws, the Company may (except in case of a transfer of this Warrant to an Affiliate or a gift or contribution for no consideration to a Family Member) require, as a condition of allowing such transfer that the Holder or transferee of this Warrant, as the case may be, either (i) furnish to the Company’s transfer agent, a written opinion of counsel (which opinion shall be in form, substance and scope customary for opinions of counsel in comparable transactions and which opinion shall be at the expense of Company) to the effect that such transfer may be made without registration under the Securities Act and under applicable state securities or blue sky laws or (ii) execute and deliver to the Company an investment letter in form and substance acceptable to the Company.  For purposes hereof, “Affiliate” means with respect to a Holder any person or entity which directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such Holder and “Family Member” means with respect to a Holder (i) any lineal descendent or sibling of such Holder, (ii) any spouse (or significant other) of such Holder or of a lineal descendent or sibling of such Holder, (iii) any entity a majority of which is owned by any of the persons listed in (i) or (ii) above and (iv) any trust for the benefit of the Holder or any of the persons listed in (i) or (ii) above.
 
(d)             Trading Market .  Promptly after the date on which any holding period applicable to this Warrant under Rule 144 has expired, the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts (i) to issue upon request of the transfer agent   an opinion stating that the restrictive legend may be removed from the Warrant and that the Warrant is freely tradable subject to customary assumptions; and (ii) to cooperate with market makers (including timely delivery of requested information) in connection with filing of a Rule 15c2-11 Exemption Request Form and to otherwise to make the Warrant eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.
 
Section 4.                             Registration, etc.
 
(a)            Subject to receipt of necessary information in writing from the Holder that may be requested by the Company, as soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than thirty (30) days following the Initial Exercise Date, the Company shall prepare and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-3 (or such other form which is available to the Company) relating to the resale of the Warrant Shares by the Holder from time to time on The Nasdaq Stock Market or the facilities of any national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded or in privately negotiated transactions.
 
(b)            In furtherance and not in limitation of any other provision of this Warrant, during any period of time in which the Company’s Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange, the Company will, at its expense, simultaneously list on The Nasdaq Stock Market or such exchange, upon official notice of issuance upon the exercise of the Warrants, and maintain such listing, all shares of Common Stock from time to time issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants; and the Company will so list on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange, will so register and will maintain such listing of, any other securities if and at the time that any securities of like class or similar type shall be listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange by the Company.
 
 
5

 
 
Section 5.                             Miscellaneous.
 
(a)             No Rights as Stockholder Until Exercise .  This Warrant does not entitle the Holder to any voting rights or other rights as a stockholder of the Company prior to the exercise hereof in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
(b)             Loss, Theft, Destruction or Mutilation of Warrant .  The Company covenants that upon receipt by the Company of evidence reasonably satisfactory to it of: the loss, theft, destruction or mutilation of this Warrant or, following the complete or partial exercise of this Warrant, of any stock certificate for shares of Common Stock, and in case of loss, theft or destruction, of indemnity or security reasonably satisfactory to it (which, in the case of the Warrant, shall not include the posting of any bond), and upon surrender and cancellation of such Warrant or stock certificate, if mutilated, the Company will make and deliver a new Warrant or stock certificate of like tenor and dated as of such cancellation, in lieu of such Warrant or stock certificate.
 
(c)             Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays, etc .  If the last or appointed day for the taking of any action or the expiration of any right required or granted herein shall not be a Business Day, then such action may be taken or such right may be exercised on the next succeeding Business Day.
 
(d)             Authorized Shares .  The Company covenants that during the period the Warrant is outstanding, it will reserve from its authorized and unissued shares Common Stock, a sufficient number thereof to provide for the issuance of the Warrant Shares upon the exercise of any purchase rights under this Warrant.
 
(e)             Governing Law .  All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Warrant shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws.
 
(f)             Nonwaiver and Expenses .  No course of dealing or any delay or failure to exercise any right hereunder on the part of Holder shall operate as a waiver of such right or otherwise prejudice the Company’s or the Holder’s rights, powers or remedies, notwithstanding the fact that all rights hereunder terminate on the Termination Date.  If the Company or a Holder willfully and knowingly fails to comply with any provision of this Warrant, which results in any material damages to the Holder or Company (as the case may be), the breaching party shall pay to the other party such amounts as shall be sufficient to cover any costs and expenses including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, including those of appellate proceedings, incurred by the non-breaching party in collecting any amounts due pursuant hereto or in otherwise enforcing any of its rights, powers or remedies hereunder.
 
(g)             Limitation of Liability .  No provision hereof, in the absence of any affirmative action by Holder to exercise this Warrant to purchase Warrant Shares, and no enumeration herein of the rights or privileges of Holder, shall give rise to any liability of Holder for the purchase price of any Common Stock or as a stockholder of the Company, whether such liability is asserted by the Company or by creditors of the Company.
 
 
6

 
 
(h)             Remedies .  Holder, in addition to being entitled to exercise all rights granted by law, including recovery of damages, will be entitled to seek specific performance of its rights under this Warrant.  The Company agrees that monetary damages would not be adequate compensation for any loss incurred by reason of a breach by it of the provisions of this Warrant and hereby agrees to waive and not to assert the defense in any action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be adequate.
 
(i)             Successors and Assigns .  Subject to applicable securities laws, this Warrant and the rights and obligations evidenced hereby shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors of the Company and the successors and permitted assigns of Holder.  The provisions of this Warrant are intended to be for the benefit of all holders from time to time of this Warrant that become holders of this Warrant in compliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
(j)             Entire Agreement; Amendment .  This Warrant constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.  Except as expressly provided herein with respect to the ability of the Company to modify or amend this Warrant, this Warrant may be modified or amended or the provisions hereof waived with the written consent of the Company and the Holder.
 
(k)             Severability .  Wherever possible, each provision of this Warrant shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Warrant shall be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provisions or the remaining provisions of this Warrant.
 
(l)             Headings .  The headings used in this Warrant are for the convenience of reference only and shall not, for any purpose, be deemed a part of this Warrant.
 

********************
 
 
7

 
 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Warrant to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized.
 
Dated: May 11, 2010
 
   
 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
   
   
 
By:
/s/ Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Name:
Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Title:
Chief Executive Officer

 
 

 
 
NOTICE OF EXERCISE

TO:
EMPIRE RESORTS INC.
 
 
Attention:  Chief Financial Officer
 

(1)           The undersigned hereby elects to purchase ________ Warrant Shares of the Company pursuant to the terms of the attached Warrant (only if exercised in full), and tenders herewith payment of the exercise price in full, together with all applicable transfer taxes, if any.
 
(2)           Please issue a certificate or certificates representing the number of Warrant Shares being purchased hereby, in the name of the undersigned or in such other name as is specified below:
 
_______________________________

(4)            Accredited Investor .  The undersigned is an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, the “Securities Act”).
 
(5)            Investment Experience .  The undersigned has sufficient knowledge and experience in business, financial and investment matters so as to be able to evaluate the risks and merits of its investment in the Company and it is able financially to bear the risks thereof.
 
(6)            Company Information; No General Solicitation .  The undersigned had access to such information regarding the Company and its affairs as is necessary to enable it to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in restricted securities of the Company and has had a reasonable opportunity to ask questions and receive answers and documents concerning the Company and its current and proposed operations, financial condition, business, business plans and prospects.  The undersigned has not been offered any of the Warrant Shares by any means of general solicitation or advertising.
 
(7)            Acquisition for Own Account .  The Warrant Shares being issued to and acquired by the undersigned are being acquired by it for its account for the purpose of investment and not with a view to, or for resale in connection with, any distribution thereof.  The undersigned understands that it must bear the economic risk of such investment indefinitely, and hold the Warrant Shares indefinitely, unless a subsequent disposition of such shares is registered pursuant to the Securities Act, or an exemption from such registration is available.  The undersigned further understands that there is no assurance that any exemption from the Securities Act will be available or, if available, that such exemption will allow it to dispose of or otherwise transfer any or all of the Warrant Shares being issued pursuant to this notice under the circumstances, in the amounts or at the times the undersigned might propose.
 
 
 

 
 
(8)            Restricted Securities .  The undersigned understands and acknowledges that none of the offer, issuance or sale of the Warrant Shares being issued pursuant to this notice has been registered under the Securities Act in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  The undersigned understands and acknowledges that such shares of stock may be subject to additional restrictions on transfer under state and/or federal securities laws.
 




[SIGNATURE OF HOLDER]

Name of Investing Entity:
 

 
_______________________________________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Signatory of Investing Entity :
 

 
_______________________________________________________________________
Name of Authorized Signatory:
 

 
_______________________________________________________________________
Title of Authorized Signatory:
 

 
_______________________________________________________________________
Date:
 
 
 

 
 
ASSIGNMENT FORM
 

(To assign the foregoing warrant, execute
this form and supply required information.
Do not use this form to exercise the warrant.)



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, [____] all of or [_______] shares of the foregoing Warrant and all rights evidenced thereby are hereby assigned to
 

_______________________________________________ whose address is

_______________________________________________________________.



_______________________________________________________________

Dated:  ______________, _______

 
Holder’s Signature:
_____________________________

 
Holder’s Address:
_____________________________

 
_____________________________

 


Signature Guaranteed:  ___________________________________________


NOTE:  The signature to this Assignment Form must correspond with the name as it appears on the face of the Warrant, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever, and must be guaranteed by a bank or trust company.  Officers of corporations and those acting in a fiduciary or other representative capacity should file proper evidence of authority to assign the foregoing Warrant.
Exhibit 4.2
 
EXECUTION VERSION


Warrant No. 10002

COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

To Purchase 1,000,000 Shares of Common Stock of
 

 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
 

THE WARRANTS AND THE SHARES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE OF THE WARRANTS HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), OR ANY STATE OR OTHER SECURITIES LAW AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (i) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR (ii) UPON RECEIPT BY THE COMPANY AN OPINION OF COUNSEL THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT.

THIS COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT (the “ Warrant ”) certifies that, for value received, JOSEPH E. BERNSTEIN and each transferee of this Warrant   (the “ Holder ”), is entitled, upon the terms and subject to the limitations on exercise and the conditions hereinafter set forth, at any time on or after the date hereof (the “ Initial Exercise Date ”) and on or prior to the close of business on May 10, 2015 (the “ Termination Date ”) but not thereafter, to subscribe for and purchase from EMPIRE RESORTS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), up to one million (1,000,000) shares (the “ Warrant Shares ”) of common stock, par value $0.01 per share of the Company (the “ Common Stock ”).  The purchase price of one (1) share of Common Stock under this Warrant shall be equal to the Exercise Price, as defined in Section 1(c) .
 
Section 1.                              Exercise .
 
(a)             Exercise of Warrant .  The Holder shall have the right at any time or from time to time on or after the Initial Exercise Date and on or before the Termination Date to exercise all or any part of this Warrant by (i) delivery to the Company of a duly executed facsimile copy of the Notice of Exercise Form annexed hereto (or such other office or agency of the Company as it may designate by notice in writing to the registered Holder at the address of such Holder appearing on the books of the Company) together with this Warrant; and (ii) within ten (10) Business Days of the date said Notice of Exercise is delivered to the Company, the Company shall have received payment of the aggregate Exercise Price of the Warrant Shares thereby purchased by wire transfer of immediately available funds or cashier’s check drawn on a United States bank.  In the event this Warrant is exercised in part, the Company shall issue a new Warrant, which shall be dated as of the date of this Warrant, covering the number of Warrant Shares in respect of which this Warrant shall not have been exercised.  The Company shall deliver any objection to any Notice of Exercise Form within two (2) Business Days of receipt of such notice.  In the event of any dispute or discrepancy with respect to whether this warrant has been exercised, the records of the Company shall be controlling and determinative in the absence of manifest error.  The Company acknowledges and agrees that it may not raise any defense, setoff or counterclaim regarding the exercise of this Warrant or the transfer of this Warrant in accordance with its terms other than with respect to a failure to pay the exercise price.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Warrant, in the event that (i) the Company reasonably determines, in its sole discretion, that it is required to withhold income tax or employment tax upon the exercise of this Warrant and (ii) the Company notifies the Holder in writing that the Company is required to withhold income or employment tax within two (2) Business Days from the receipt by the Company of the Notice of Exercise Form, then the Holder shall pay such withholding tax to the Company in cash along with the Exercise Price (in which case this Warrant shall be considered properly exercised).
 
 
 

 
 
(b)             Expiration of Warrant .  This Warrant shall expire and cease to be of any force or effect on the Termination Date.
 
(c)             Exercise Price .  The exercise price at which one (1) Warrant Share shall be purchasable upon exercise of this Warrant shall be $2.00 (the “ Exercise Price ”).
 
(d)            Mechanics of Exercise.
 
i.             Authorization of Warrant Shares .  The Company covenants that all Warrant Shares which may be issued upon the exercise of the purchase rights represented by this Warrant will, upon exercise of the purchase rights represented by this Warrant, be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and free from all taxes, liens and charges created by the Company in respect of the issue thereof (other than taxes in respect of any transfer occurring contemporaneously with such issue).
 
ii.             Delivery of Certificates Upon Exercise .  The Company shall be required to deliver certificates for the Warrant Shares subject to the exercise of this Warrant, which shall be transmitted by the transfer agent of the Company to the Holder by physical delivery to the address specified by the Holder in the Notice of Exercise within three (3) Business Days from the delivery to the Company of the Notice of Exercise Form, surrender of this Warrant (if required) and payment of the aggregate Exercise Price as set forth above.  This Warrant shall be deemed to have been exercised on the date the Exercise Price is received by the Company.  The Warrant Shares which are subject to an exercise of this Warrant shall be deemed to have been issued, and Holder or any other person so designated to be named therein shall be deemed to have become a holder of record thereof for all purposes, as of the date the Warrant has been exercised by payment to the Company of the Exercise Price and all taxes required to be paid by the Holder, if any, pursuant to Section 1(d)(iv) prior to the issuance of such shares, have been paid.
 
 
2

 
 
iii.             No Fractional Shares or Scrip .  No fractional shares of Common Stock or scrip representing fractional shares shall be issued upon the exercise of this Warrant.  As to any fraction of a share which Holder would otherwise be entitled to purchase upon such exercise, the Company shall at its election, either pay a cash adjustment in respect of such final fraction in an amount equal to such fraction multiplied by the VWAP on the date of exercise or round up to the next whole share.  “ VWAP ” means, for any date, the daily volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for such date (or the nearest preceding date) on the principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded or quoted as reported by Bloomberg Financial L.P. (based on a Trading Day from 9:30 a.m. (New York City time) to 4:02 p.m. (New York City time)) or if the Common Stock is not traded or quoted, as determined by the Board of Directors in good faith.
 
iv.             Charges, Taxes and Expenses .  Certificates representing the shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the partial or complete exercise of this Warrant shall be made without charge to the Holder, and the Company shall bear the cost of any issue or transfer tax or other incidental expense in respect of the issuance of such certificates, and such certificates shall be issued in the name of the Holder or in such name or names as may be directed by the Holder; provided , however , that in the event that this Warrant or the certificates representing the shares of Common Stock which are issued upon the partial or complete exercise of this Warrant are to be re-issued in a name other than the name of the Holder, the Company may require, as a condition to such re-issuance, the payment of a sum sufficient to reimburse it for any issue or transfer tax incidental thereto, and the Company shall have first received the original Warrant or stock certificates which are to be re-issued, along with duly prepared, executed and certified assignment documentation acceptable to the Company.  Prior to re-issuing this Warrant in a name other than the Holder, the Company shall have also first received a completed and duly executed Assignment Form in the form attached hereto.
 
Section 2.                              Certain Adjustments .
 
(a)             Stock Dividends and Splits .  If the Company shall at any time prior to the expiration of this Warrant subdivide its outstanding Common Stock, by split-up or otherwise, or combine its outstanding Common Stock, or issue additional shares of its capital stock in payment of a stock dividend in respect of its Common Stock, the number of shares issuable on the exercise of the unexercised portion of this Warrant shall forthwith be proportionately increased in the case of a subdivision or stock dividend, or proportionately decreased in the case of a combination, and the Exercise Price then applicable to shares covered by the unexercised portion of this Warrant shall forthwith be proportionately decreased in the case of a subdivision or stock dividend, or proportionately increased in the case of a combination.  In the event a decrease in the Exercise Price reduces the Exercise Price below the par value of the Common Stock, the Company shall use its best efforts to reduce the par value to an amount less than the Exercise Price as adjusted.
 
 
3

 
 
(b)             Reclassifications; Reorganizations .  In case of any reclassification, capital reorganization, or change of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (other than as a result of a subdivision, combination or in kind dividend), or in case of any consolidation of the Company with, or merger of the Company into, another corporation or other business organization (other than a consolidation or merger in which the Company is the continuing corporation and which does not result in any reclassification or change of the outstanding shares of Common Stock), or in case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or other business organization of the property of the Company as an entirety or substantially as an entirety, at any time prior to the expiration of this Warrant, then, as a condition of such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance, lawful provision shall be made, and duly executed documents evidencing the same from the Company or its successor shall be delivered to the holder of this Warrant, so that the holder of this Warrant shall have the right prior to the expiration of this Warrant to purchase, at a total price not to exceed the price payable upon the exercise of the unexercised portion of this Warrant, the kind and amount of securities and property receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance by a holder of the number of Warrant Shares issuable on the unexercised portion of the Warrant which might have been purchased by the holder of this Warrant immediately prior to such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance, and in any such case appropriate provisions (including without limitation, provisions for the adjustment of the number of Warrant Shares purchasable upon exercise of this Warrant) shall thereafter be applicable in relation to any shares of stock, and other securities and property thereafter deliverable upon exercise hereof.
 
Section 3.                              Transfer of Warrant .
 
(a)             Transferability .  Subject to compliance with any applicable securities laws and the conditions set forth in Section 3(c) below, this Warrant and all rights hereunder may be transferred, in whole or in part.  Any such transfer shall occur upon surrender of this Warrant at the principal office of the Company or its designated agent, together with a written assignment of this Warrant substantially in the form attached hereto duly executed by the Holder or its agent or attorney and funds sufficient to pay any transfer taxes payable upon the making of such transfer.  Upon such surrender and, if required, such payment, the Company shall execute and deliver a new Warrant or Warrants in the name of the assignee or assignees and in the denomination or denominations specified in such instrument of assignment, and shall issue to the assignor a new Warrant evidencing the portion of this Warrant not so assigned, and this Warrant shall promptly be cancelled.  A Warrant, if properly assigned in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Warrant, may be exercised by a new holder for the purchase of Warrant Shares without having a new Warrant issued.
 
(b)             New Warrants .  This Warrant may be divided or combined with other Warrants upon presentation hereof at the aforesaid office of the Company, together with a written notice specifying the names and denominations in which new Warrants are to be issued, signed by the Holder or its agent or attorney.  Subject to compliance with Section 3(a) , as to any transfer which may be involved in such division or combination, the Company shall execute and deliver a new Warrant or Warrants in exchange for the Warrant or Warrants to be divided or combined in accordance with such notice.
 
 
4

 
 
(c)            Transfer Restrictions .  If, at the time of the surrender of this Warrant in connection with any transfer of this Warrant, the transfer of this Warrant shall not be registered pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act and under applicable state securities or blue sky laws, the Company may (except in case of a transfer of this Warrant to an Affiliate or a gift or contribution for no consideration to a Family Member) require, as a condition of allowing such transfer that the Holder or transferee of this Warrant, as the case may be, either (i) furnish to the Company’s transfer agent, a written opinion of counsel (which opinion shall be in form, substance and scope customary for opinions of counsel in comparable transactions and which opinion shall be at the expense of Company) to the effect that such transfer may be made without registration under the Securities Act and under applicable state securities or blue sky laws or (ii) execute and deliver to the Company an investment letter in form and substance acceptable to the Company.  For purposes hereof, “ Affiliate ” means with respect to a Holder any person or entity which directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such Holder and “ Family Member ” means with respect to a Holder (i) any lineal descendent or sibling of such Holder, (ii) any spouse (or significant other) of such Holder or of a lineal descendent or sibling of such Holder, (iii) any entity a majority of which is owned by any of the persons listed in (i) or (ii) above and (iv) any trust for the benefit of the Holder or any of the persons listed in (i) or (ii) above.
 
(d)            Trading Market .  Promptly after the date on which any holding period applicable to this Warrant under Rule 144 has expired, the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts (i) to issue upon request of the transfer agent an opinion stating that the restrictive legend may be removed from the Warrant and that the Warrant is freely tradable subject to customary assumptions; and (ii) to cooperate with market makers (including timely delivery of requested information) in connection with filing of a Rule 15c2-11 Exemption Request Form and to otherwise to make the Warrant eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.
 
Section 4.                              Registration, etc .
 
(a)            Subject to receipt of necessary information in writing from the Holder that may be requested by the Company, as soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than thirty (30) days following the Initial Exercise Date, the Company shall prepare and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-3 (or such other form which is available to the Company) relating to the resale of the Warrant Shares by the Holder from time to time on The Nasdaq Stock Market or the facilities of any national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded or in privately negotiated transactions.
 
(b)            In furtherance and not in limitation of any other provision of this Warrant, during any period of time in which the Company’s Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange, the Company will, at its expense, simultaneously list on The Nasdaq Stock Market or such exchange, upon official notice of issuance upon the exercise of the Warrants, and maintain such listing, all shares of Common Stock from time to time issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants; and the Company will so list on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange, will so register and will maintain such listing of, any other securities if and at the time that any securities of like class or similar type shall be listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange by the Company.
 
 
5

 
 
Section 5.                              Miscellaneous .
 
(a)             No Rights as Stockholder Until Exercise .  This Warrant does not entitle the Holder to any voting rights or other rights as a stockholder of the Company prior to the exercise hereof in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
(b)             Loss, Theft, Destruction or Mutilation of Warrant .  The Company covenants that upon receipt by the Company of evidence reasonably satisfactory to it of: the loss, theft, destruction or mutilation of this Warrant or, following the complete or partial exercise of this Warrant, of any stock certificate for shares of Common Stock, and in case of loss, theft or destruction, of indemnity or security reasonably satisfactory to it (which, in the case of the Warrant, shall not include the posting of any bond), and upon surrender and cancellation of such Warrant or stock certificate, if mutilated, the Company will make and deliver a new Warrant or stock certificate of like tenor and dated as of such cancellation, in lieu of such Warrant or stock certificate.
 
(c)             Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays, etc .  If the last or appointed day for the taking of any action or the expiration of any right required or granted herein shall not be a Business Day, then such action may be taken or such right may be exercised on the next succeeding Business Day.
 
(d)             Authorized Shares .  The Company covenants that during the period the Warrant is outstanding, it will reserve from its authorized and unissued shares Common Stock, a sufficient number thereof to provide for the issuance of the Warrant Shares upon the exercise of any purchase rights under this Warrant.
 
(e)             Governing Law .  All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Warrant shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws.
 
(f)             Nonwaiver and Expenses .  No course of dealing or any delay or failure to exercise any right hereunder on the part of Holder shall operate as a waiver of such right or otherwise prejudice the Company’s or the Holder’s rights, powers or remedies, notwithstanding the fact that all rights hereunder terminate on the Termination Date.  If the Company or a Holder willfully and knowingly fails to comply with any provision of this Warrant, which results in any material damages to the Holder or Company (as the case may be), the breaching party shall pay to the other party such amounts as shall be sufficient to cover any costs and expenses including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, including those of appellate proceedings, incurred by the non-breaching party in collecting any amounts due pursuant hereto or in otherwise enforcing any of its rights, powers or remedies hereunder.
 
(g)             Limitation of Liability .  No provision hereof, in the absence of any affirmative action by Holder to exercise this Warrant to purchase Warrant Shares, and no enumeration herein of the rights or privileges of Holder, shall give rise to any liability of Holder for the purchase price of any Common Stock or as a stockholder of the Company, whether such liability is asserted by the Company or by creditors of the Company.
 
 
6

 
 
(h)             Remedies .  Holder, in addition to being entitled to exercise all rights granted by law, including recovery of damages, will be entitled to seek specific performance of its rights under this Warrant.  The Company agrees that monetary damages would not be adequate compensation for any loss incurred by reason of a breach by it of the provisions of this Warrant and hereby agrees to waive and not to assert the defense in any action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be adequate.
 
(i)             Successors and Assigns .  Subject to applicable securities laws, this Warrant and the rights and obligations evidenced hereby shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors of the Company and the successors and permitted assigns of Holder.  The provisions of this Warrant are intended to be for the benefit of all holders from time to time of this Warrant that become holders of this Warrant in compliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
(j)             Entire Agreement; Amendment .  This Warrant constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.  Except as expressly provided herein with respect to the ability of the Company to modify or amend this Warrant, this Warrant may be modified or amended or the provisions hereof waived with the written consent of the Company and the Holder.
 
(k)             Severability .  Wherever possible, each provision of this Warrant shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Warrant shall be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provisions or the remaining provisions of this Warrant.
 
(l)             Headings .  The headings used in this Warrant are for the convenience of reference only and shall not, for any purpose, be deemed a part of this Warrant.
 

********************
 
 
7

 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Warrant to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized.
 

Dated: May 11, 2010

 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
   
   
 
By:
/s/ Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Name:
Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Title:
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 

 

NOTICE OF EXERCISE

TO:           EMPIRE RESORTS INC.

Attention:  Chief Financial Officer

(1)           The undersigned hereby elects to purchase ________ Warrant Shares of the Company pursuant to the terms of the attached Warrant (only if exercised in full), and tenders herewith payment of the exercise price in full, together with all applicable transfer taxes, if any.
 
(2)           Please issue a certificate or certificates representing the number of Warrant Shares being purchased hereby, in the name of the undersigned or in such other name as is specified below:
 
_______________________________

(4)            Accredited Investor .  The undersigned is an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, the “Securities Act”).
 
(5)            Investment Experience .  The undersigned has sufficient knowledge and experience in business, financial and investment matters so as to be able to evaluate the risks and merits of its investment in the Company and it is able financially to bear the risks thereof.
 
(6)            Company Information; No General Solicitation .  The undersigned had access to such information regarding the Company and its affairs as is necessary to enable it to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in restricted securities of the Company and has had a reasonable opportunity to ask questions and receive answers and documents concerning the Company and its current and proposed operations, financial condition, business, business plans and prospects.  The undersigned has not been offered any of the Warrant Shares by any means of general solicitation or advertising.
 
(7)            Acquisition for Own Account .  The Warrant Shares being issued to and acquired by the undersigned are being acquired by it for its account for the purpose of investment and not with a view to, or for resale in connection with, any distribution thereof.  The undersigned understands that it must bear the economic risk of such investment indefinitely, and hold the Warrant Shares indefinitely, unless a subsequent disposition of such shares is registered pursuant to the Securities Act, or an exemption from such registration is available.  The undersigned further understands that there is no assurance that any exemption from the Securities Act will be available or, if available, that such exemption will allow it to dispose of or otherwise transfer any or all of the Warrant Shares being issued pursuant to this notice under the circumstances, in the amounts or at the times the undersigned might propose.
 
 
 

 
 
(8)            Restricted Securities .  The undersigned understands and acknowledges that none of the offer, issuance or sale of the Warrant Shares being issued pursuant to this notice has been registered under the Securities Act in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  The undersigned understands and acknowledges that such shares of stock may be subject to additional restrictions on transfer under state and/or federal securities laws.
 




[SIGNATURE OF HOLDER]
 
   
Name of Investing Entity:
 
   
   
Signature of Authorized Signatory of Investing Entity :
 
   
   
Name of Authorized Signatory:
 
   
   
Title of Authorized Signatory:
 
   
   
Date:
 

 
 

 

ASSIGNMENT FORM
 

(To assign the foregoing warrant, execute
this form and supply required information.
Do not use this form to exercise the warrant.)



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, [____] all of or [_______] shares of the foregoing Warrant and all rights evidenced thereby are hereby assigned to
 

 
whose address is
 
       
   
       
       
       
   
       
   
Dated:
______________, _______
 
       
       
 
Holder’s Signature:
   
       
 
Holder’s Address:
   
       
       
       
       
       
Signature Guaranteed:
   


NOTE:  The signature to this Assignment Form must correspond with the name as it appears on the face of the Warrant, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever, and must be guaranteed by a bank or trust company.  Officers of corporations and those acting in a fiduciary or other representative capacity should file proper evidence of authority to assign the foregoing Warrant.

Exhibit 4.3
 
EXECUTION VERSION


Warrant No. 10001

COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

To Purchase 2,000,000 Shares of Common Stock of
 

 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
 

THE WARRANTS AND THE SHARES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE OF THE WARRANTS HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), OR ANY STATE OR OTHER SECURITIES LAW AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (i) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR (ii) UPON RECEIPT BY THE COMPANY AN OPINION OF COUNSEL THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT.

THIS WARRANT IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DATED MAY 11, 2010 BY AND AMONG EMPIRE RESORTS, INC., CERTAIN THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS SIGNATORIES THERETO AND JOSEPH BERNSTEIN.  A COPY OF SUCH AGREEMENT IS ON FILE AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.

THIS COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT (the “ Warrant ”) certifies that, for value received, JOSEPH E. BERNSTEIN and each transferee of this Warrant   (the “ Holder ”), is entitled, upon the terms and subject to the limitations on exercise and the conditions hereinafter set forth, at any time on or after the date hereof (the “ Initial Exercise Date ”) and on or prior to the close of business on May 10, 2020 (the “ Termination Date ”) but not thereafter, to subscribe for and purchase from EMPIRE RESORTS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), up to two million (2,000,000) shares (the “ Warrant Shares ”) of common stock, par value $0.01 per share of the Company (the “ Common Stock ”).  The purchase price of one (1) share of Common Stock under this Warrant shall be equal to the Exercise Price, as defined in Section 1(c) .
 
 
 

 
 
Section 1.                              Exercise .
 
(a)             Exercise of Warrant .  The Holder shall have the right at any time or from time to time on or after the exercise in full of Warrant No. 10002 and Warrant No. 10003 issued to Joseph Bernstein on the date hereof or any new warrants issued in replacement thereof and on or before the Termination Date to exercise all or any part of this Warrant by (i) delivery to the Company of a duly executed facsimile copy of the Notice of Exercise Form annexed hereto (or such other office or agency of the Company as it may designate by notice in writing to the registered Holder at the address of such Holder appearing on the books of the Company) together with this Warrant; and (ii) within ten (10) Business Days of the date said Notice of Exercise is delivered to the Company, the Company shall have received payment of the aggregate Exercise Price of the Warrant Shares thereby purchased by wire transfer of immediately available funds or cashier’s check drawn on a United States bank, unless this Warrant is being exercised pursuant to the cashless exercise provision set forth in Section 1(d) below.  In the event this Warrant is exercised in part, the Company shall issue a new Warrant, which shall be dated as of the date of this Warrant, covering the number of Warrant Shares in respect of which this Warrant shall not have been exercised.  The Company shall deliver any objection to any Notice of Exercise Form within two (2) Business Days of receipt of such notice.  In the event of any dispute or discrepancy with respect to whether this warrant has been exercised, the records of the Company shall be controlling and determinative in the absence of manifest error.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Warrant, in the event that (i) the Company reasonably determines, in its sole discretion, that it is required to withhold income tax or employment tax upon the exercise of this Warrant and (ii) the Company notifies the Holder in writing that the Company is required to withhold income or employment tax within two (2) Business Days from the receipt by the Company of the Notice of Exercise Form, then the Holder shall pay such withholding tax to the Company in cash along with the Exercise Price (in which case this Warrant shall be considered properly exercised).
 
(b)             Expiration of Warrant .  This Warrant shall expire and cease to be of any force or effect on the Termination Date.
 
(c)             Exercise Price .  The exercise price at which one (1) Warrant Share shall be purchasable upon exercise of this Warrant shall be $2.00 (the “ Exercise Price ”).
 
(d)             Cashless Exercise .  Notwithstanding any provisions herein to the contrary, in lieu of exercising this Warrant by payment of cash, this Warrant may be exercised by means of a “cashless exercise” in which the Holder shall be entitled to receive the number of Warrant Shares equal to, and the Company shall issue to Holder such number of Warrant Shares equal to, the quotient obtained by dividing (A-B) (X) by (A), where:
 
 
(A) =
the VWAP (as defined below) on the Business Day immediately preceding the date of such election;

 
(B) =
the Exercise Price of this Warrant; and

 
(X) =
the number of Warrant Shares with respect to which this Warrant is being exercised.

VWAP ” means, for any date, the daily volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for such date (or the nearest preceding date) on the principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded or quoted as reported by Bloomberg Financial L.P. (based on a Trading Day from 9:30 a.m. (New York City time) to 4:02 p.m. (New York City time)) or if the Common Stock is not traded or quoted, as determined by the Board of Directors in good faith.
 
 
2

 

(e)            Mechanics of Exercise.
 
i.             Authorization of Warrant Shares .  The Company covenants that all Warrant Shares which may be issued upon the exercise of the purchase rights represented by this Warrant will, upon exercise of the purchase rights represented by this Warrant, be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and free from all taxes, liens and charges created by the Company in respect of the issue thereof (other than taxes in respect of any transfer occurring contemporaneously with such issue).
 
ii.             Delivery of Certificates Upon Exercise .  The Company shall be required to deliver certificates for the Warrant Shares subject to the exercise of this Warrant, which shall be transmitted by the transfer agent of the Company to the Holder by physical delivery to the address specified by the Holder in the Notice of Exercise within three (3) Business Days from the delivery to the Company of the Notice of Exercise Form, surrender of this Warrant (if required) and payment of the aggregate Exercise Price as set forth above.  This Warrant shall be deemed to have been exercised on the date (a) the Exercise Price is received by the Company or (b) notification to the Company that this Warrant is being exercised pursuant to a cashless exercise provision set forth in Section 1(d) above.  The Warrant Shares which are subject to an exercise of this Warrant shall be deemed to have been issued, and Holder or any other person so designated to be named therein shall be deemed to have become a holder of record thereof for all purposes, as of the date the Warrant has been exercised by payment to the Company of the Exercise Price (or by cashless exercise, if permitted) and all taxes required to be paid by the Holder, if any, pursuant to Section 1(e)(iv) prior to the issuance of such shares, have been paid.
 
iii.             No Fractional Shares or Scrip .  No fractional shares of Common Stock or scrip representing fractional shares shall be issued upon the exercise of this Warrant.  As to any fraction of a share which Holder would otherwise be entitled to purchase upon such exercise, the Company shall at its election, either pay a cash adjustment in respect of such final fraction in an amount equal to such fraction multiplied by the VWAP on the date of exercise or round up to the next whole share.
 
iv.             Charges, Taxes and Expenses .  Certificates representing the shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the partial or complete exercise of this Warrant shall be made without charge to the Holder, and the Company shall bear the cost of any issue or transfer tax or other incidental expense in respect of the issuance of such certificates, and such certificates shall be issued in the name of the Holder or in such name or names as may be directed by the Holder; provided , however , that in the event that this Warrant or the certificates representing the shares of Common Stock which are issued upon the partial or complete exercise of this Warrant are to be re-issued in a name other than the name of the Holder, the Company may require, as a condition to such re-issuance, the payment of a sum sufficient to reimburse it for any issue or transfer tax incidental thereto, and the Company shall have first received the original Warrant or stock certificates which are to be re-issued, along with duly prepared, executed and certified assignment documentation acceptable to the Company.  Prior to re-issuing this Warrant in a name other than the Holder, the Company shall have also first received a completed and duly executed Assignment Form in the form attached hereto.
 
 
3

 
 
Section 2.                             Certain Adjustments.
 
(a)             Stock Dividends and Splits .  If the Company shall at any time prior to the expiration of this Warrant subdivide its outstanding Common Stock, by split-up or otherwise, or combine its outstanding Common Stock, or issue additional shares of its capital stock in payment of a stock dividend in respect of its Common Stock, the number of shares issuable on the exercise of the unexercised portion of this Warrant shall forthwith be proportionately increased in the case of a subdivision or stock dividend, or proportionately decreased in the case of a combination, and the Exercise Price then applicable to shares covered by the unexercised portion of this Warrant shall forthwith be proportionately decreased in the case of a subdivision or stock dividend, or proportionately increased in the case of a combination.  In the event a decrease in the Exercise Price reduces the Exercise Price below the par value of the Common Stock, the Company shall use its best efforts to reduce the par value to an amount less than the Exercise Price as adjusted.
 
(b)             Reclassifications; Reorganizations .  In case of any reclassification, capital reorganization, or change of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (other than as a result of a subdivision, combination or in kind dividend), or in case of any consolidation of the Company with, or merger of the Company into, another corporation or other business organization (other than a consolidation or merger in which the Company is the continuing corporation and which does not result in any reclassification or change of the outstanding shares of Common Stock), or in case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or other business organization of the property of the Company as an entirety or substantially as an entirety, at any time prior to the expiration of this Warrant, then, as a condition of such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance, lawful provision shall be made, and duly executed documents evidencing the same from the Company or its successor shall be delivered to the holder of this Warrant, so that the holder of this Warrant shall have the right prior to the expiration of this Warrant to purchase, at a total price not to exceed the price payable upon the exercise of the unexercised portion of this Warrant, the kind and amount of securities and property receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance by a holder of the number of Warrant Shares issuable on the unexercised portion of the Warrant which might have been purchased by the holder of this Warrant immediately prior to such reclassification, reorganization, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance, and in any such case appropriate provisions (including without limitation, provisions for the adjustment of the number of Warrant Shares purchasable upon exercise of this Warrant) shall thereafter be applicable in relation to any shares of stock, and other securities and property thereafter deliverable upon exercise hereof.
 
 
4

 
 
Section 3.                              Transfer of Warrant .
 
(a)             Transferability .  Subject to compliance with any applicable securities laws and the conditions set forth in Section 3(c) below, this Warrant and all rights hereunder may be transferred, in whole or in part.  Any such transfer shall occur upon surrender of this Warrant at the principal office of the Company or its designated agent, together with a written assignment of this Warrant substantially in the form attached hereto duly executed by the Holder or its agent or attorney and funds sufficient to pay any transfer taxes payable upon the making of such transfer.  Upon such surrender and, if required, such payment, the Company shall execute and deliver a new Warrant or Warrants in the name of the assignee or assignees and in the denomination or denominations specified in such instrument of assignment, and shall issue to the assignor a new Warrant evidencing the portion of this Warrant not so assigned, and this Warrant shall promptly be cancelled.  A Warrant, if properly assigned in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Warrant, may be exercised by a new holder for the purchase of Warrant Shares without having a new Warrant issued.
 
(b)             New Warrants .  This Warrant may be divided or combined with other Warrants upon presentation hereof at the aforesaid office of the Company, together with a written notice specifying the names and denominations in which new Warrants are to be issued, signed by the Holder or its agent or attorney.  Subject to compliance with Section 3(a) , as to any transfer which may be involved in such division or combination, the Company shall execute and deliver a new Warrant or Warrants in exchange for the Warrant or Warrants to be divided or combined in accordance with such notice.
 
(c)            Transfer Restrictions .  If, at the time of the surrender of this Warrant in connection with any transfer of this Warrant, the transfer of this Warrant shall not be registered pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act and under applicable state securities or blue sky laws, the Company may (except in case of a transfer of this Warrant to an Affiliate or a gift or contribution for no consideration to a Family Member) require, as a condition of allowing such transfer that the Holder or transferee of this Warrant, as the case may be, either (i) furnish to the Company’s transfer agent, a written opinion of counsel (which opinion shall be in form, substance and scope customary for opinions of counsel in comparable transactions and which opinion shall be at the expense of Company) to the effect that such transfer may be made without registration under the Securities Act and under applicable state securities or blue sky laws or (ii) execute and deliver to the Company an investment letter in form and substance acceptable to the Company.  For purposes hereof, “ Affiliate ” means with respect to a Holder any person or entity which directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such Holder and “ Family Member ” means with respect to a Holder (i) any lineal descendent or sibling of such Holder, (ii) any spouse (or significant other) of such Holder or of a lineal descendent or sibling of such Holder, (iii) any entity a majority of which is owned by any of the persons listed in (i) or (ii) above and (iv) any trust for the benefit of the Holder or any of the persons listed in (i) or (ii) above.
 
(d)            Trading Market .  Promptly after the date on which any holding period applicable to this Warrant under Rule 144 has expired, the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts (i) to issue upon request of the transfer agent an opinion stating that the restrictive legend may be removed from the Warrant and that the Warrant is freely tradable subject to customary assumptions; and (ii) to cooperate with market makers (including timely delivery of requested information) in connection with filing of a Rule 15c2-11 Exemption Request Form and to otherwise to make the Warrant eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.
 
 
5

 
 
Section 4.                             Registration, etc .
 
(a)            Subject to receipt of necessary information in writing from the Holder that may be requested by the Company, as soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than thirty (30) days following the Initial Exercise Date, the Company shall prepare and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-3 (or such other form which is available to the Company) relating to the resale of the Warrant Shares by the Holder from time to time on The Nasdaq Stock Market or the facilities of any national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded or in privately negotiated transactions.
 
(b)            In furtherance and not in limitation of any other provision of this Warrant, during any period of time in which the Company’s Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange, the Company will, at its expense, simultaneously list on The Nasdaq Stock Market or such exchange, upon official notice of issuance upon the exercise of the Warrants, and maintain such listing, all shares of Common Stock from time to time issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants; and the Company will so list on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange, will so register and will maintain such listing of, any other securities if and at the time that any securities of like class or similar type shall be listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange by the Company.
 
Section 5.                              Miscellaneous .
 
(a)             No Rights as Stockholder Until Exercise .  This Warrant does not entitle the Holder to any voting rights or other rights as a stockholder of the Company prior to the exercise hereof in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
(b)             Loss, Theft, Destruction or Mutilation of Warrant .  The Company covenants that upon receipt by the Company of evidence reasonably satisfactory to it of: the loss, theft, destruction or mutilation of this Warrant or, following the complete or partial exercise of this Warrant, of any stock certificate for shares of Common Stock, and in case of loss, theft or destruction, of indemnity or security reasonably satisfactory to it (which, in the case of the Warrant, shall not include the posting of any bond), and upon surrender and cancellation of such Warrant or stock certificate, if mutilated, the Company will make and deliver a new Warrant or stock certificate of like tenor and dated as of such cancellation, in lieu of such Warrant or stock certificate.
 
(c)             Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays, etc .  If the last or appointed day for the taking of any action or the expiration of any right required or granted herein shall not be a Business Day, then such action may be taken or such right may be exercised on the next succeeding Business Day.
 
 
6

 
 
(d)             Authorized Shares .  The Company covenants that during the period the Warrant is outstanding, it will reserve from its authorized and unissued shares Common Stock, a sufficient number thereof to provide for the issuance of the Warrant Shares upon the exercise of any purchase rights under this Warrant.
 
(e)             Governing Law .  All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Warrant shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws.
 
(f)             Nonwaiver and Expenses .  No course of dealing or any delay or failure to exercise any right hereunder on the part of Holder shall operate as a waiver of such right or otherwise prejudice the Company’s or the Holder’s rights, powers or remedies, notwithstanding the fact that all rights hereunder terminate on the Termination Date.  If the Company or a Holder willfully and knowingly fails to comply with any provision of this Warrant, which results in any material damages to the Holder or Company (as the case may be), the breaching party shall pay to the other party such amounts as shall be sufficient to cover any costs and expenses including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, including those of appellate proceedings, incurred by the non-breaching party in collecting any amounts due pursuant hereto or in otherwise enforcing any of its rights, powers or remedies hereunder.
 
(g)             Limitation of Liability .  No provision hereof, in the absence of any affirmative action by Holder to exercise this Warrant to purchase Warrant Shares, and no enumeration herein of the rights or privileges of Holder, shall give rise to any liability of Holder for the purchase price of any Common Stock or as a stockholder of the Company, whether such liability is asserted by the Company or by creditors of the Company.
 
(h)             Remedies .  Holder, in addition to being entitled to exercise all rights granted by law, including recovery of damages, will be entitled to seek specific performance of its rights under this Warrant.  The Company agrees that monetary damages would not be adequate compensation for any loss incurred by reason of a breach by it of the provisions of this Warrant and hereby agrees to waive and not to assert the defense in any action for specific performance that a remedy at law would be adequate.
 
(i)             Successors and Assigns .  Subject to applicable securities laws, this Warrant and the rights and obligations evidenced hereby shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors of the Company and the successors and permitted assigns of Holder.  The provisions of this Warrant are intended to be for the benefit of all holders from time to time of this Warrant that become holders of this Warrant in compliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
(j)             Entire Agreement; Amendment .  This Warrant constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.  Except as expressly provided herein with respect to the ability of the Company to modify or amend this Warrant, this Warrant may be modified or amended or the provisions hereof waived with the written consent of the Company and the Holder.
 
 
7

 
 
(k)             Severability .  Wherever possible, each provision of this Warrant shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Warrant shall be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provisions or the remaining provisions of this Warrant.
 
(l)             Headings .  The headings used in this Warrant are for the convenience of reference only and shall not, for any purpose, be deemed a part of this Warrant.
 

********************
 
 
8

 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Warrant to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized.
 

Dated: May 11, 2010
 
 
 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
   
   
 
By:
/s/ Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Name:
Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Title:
Chief Executive Officer

 
 

 

NOTICE OF EXERCISE

TO:           EMPIRE RESORTS INC.

Attention:  Chief Financial Officer

(1)           The undersigned hereby elects to purchase ________ Warrant Shares of the Company pursuant to the terms of the attached Warrant (only if exercised in full), and tenders herewith payment of the exercise price in full, together with all applicable transfer taxes, if any.
 
(2)           Payment shall take the form of (check applicable box):
 
[  ] in lawful money of the United States; or
 
[ ] the cancellation of such number of Warrant Shares as is necessary, in accordance with the formula set forth in subsection 1(d), to exercise this Warrant with respect to the maximum number of Warrant Shares purchasable pursuant to the cashless exercise procedure set forth in subsection 1(d).
 
(3)           Please issue a certificate or certificates representing the number of Warrant Shares being purchased hereby, in the name of the undersigned or in such other name as is specified below:
 
_______________________________

(4)            Accredited Investor .  The undersigned is an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, the “Securities Act”).
 
(5)            Investment Experience .  The undersigned has sufficient knowledge and experience in business, financial and investment matters so as to be able to evaluate the risks and merits of its investment in the Company and it is able financially to bear the risks thereof.
 
(6)            Company Information; No General Solicitation .  The undersigned had access to such information regarding the Company and its affairs as is necessary to enable it to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in restricted securities of the Company and has had a reasonable opportunity to ask questions and receive answers and documents concerning the Company and its current and proposed operations, financial condition, business, business plans and prospects.  The undersigned has not been offered any of the Warrant Shares by any means of general solicitation or advertising.
 
(7)            Acquisition for Own Account .  The Warrant Shares being issued to and acquired by the undersigned are being acquired by it for its account for the purpose of investment and not with a view to, or for resale in connection with, any distribution thereof.  The undersigned understands that it must bear the economic risk of such investment indefinitely, and hold the Warrant Shares indefinitely, unless a subsequent disposition of such shares is registered pursuant to the Securities Act, or an exemption from such registration is available.  The undersigned further understands that there is no assurance that any exemption from the Securities Act will be available or, if available, that such exemption will allow it to dispose of or otherwise transfer any or all of the Warrant Shares being issued pursuant to this notice under the circumstances, in the amounts or at the times the undersigned might propose.
 
 
 

 
 
(8)            Restricted Securities .  The undersigned understands and acknowledges that none of the offer, issuance or sale of the Warrant Shares being issued pursuant to this notice has been registered under the Securities Act in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  The undersigned understands and acknowledges that such shares of stock may be subject to additional restrictions on transfer under state and/or federal securities laws.
 




[SIGNATURE OF HOLDER]
 
   
Name of Investing Entity:
 
   
   
Signature of Authorized Signatory of Investing Entity:
 
   
   
Name of Authorized Signatory:
 
   
   
Title of Authorized Signatory:
 
   
   
Date:
 

 
 

 

ASSIGNMENT FORM
 

(To assign the foregoing warrant, execute
this form and supply required information.
Do not use this form to exercise the warrant.)



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, [____] all of or [_______] shares of the foregoing Warrant and all rights evidenced thereby are hereby assigned to
 

 
whose address is
 
       
   
       
       
       
   
       
   
Dated:
______________, _______
 
       
       
 
Holder’s Signature:
   
       
 
Holder’s Address:
   
       
       
       
       
       
Signature Guaranteed:
   


NOTE:  The signature to this Assignment Form must correspond with the name as it appears on the face of the Warrant, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever, and must be guaranteed by a bank or trust company.  Officers of corporations and those acting in a fiduciary or other representative capacity should file proper evidence of authority to assign the foregoing Warrant.

 






Exhibit 10.1
 
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
 
This Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”), dated as of the 11th day of May, 2010, is entered into by and among Plaintiff Empire Resorts, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware, its parents, subsidiaries, divisions and affiliates (collectively, “Empire Resorts”), Third-Party Defendants Kien Huat Realty III, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Isle of Man, its parents, subsidiaries, divisions and affiliates (collectively, “Kien Huat”), Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, G. Michael Brown, and Defendant Joseph Bernstein (collectively, Plaintiff, Third-Party Defendants, and Defendant are sometimes referred to herein as the “Parties”).
 
WHEREAS, Empire Resorts has commenced an action, captioned Empire Resorts, Inc., v. Joseph E. Bernstein , (the “Empire Resorts Action”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”);
 
WHEREAS, Joseph Bernstein has filed counterclaims against Empire Resorts and a third-party claim against Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, and G. Michael Brown in the Empire Resorts Action;
 
WHEREAS, the Parties on behalf of themselves and their predecessors, assignors, successors, agents, related companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, officers, employees, representatives, heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, desire to settle and terminate all of their disputes with each other, including without limitation all claims that are or could be asserted in the Empire Resorts Action or in any other proceeding involving the Parties;
 
WHEREAS, in entering into this Agreement, none of the Parties concedes the sufficiency or validity of any claims, cross claims, third-party claims, or defenses that were asserted or could be asserted by any of the Parties, or any other persons;
 
 
 

 
 
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, releases and covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties enter into this Agreement, and it is hereby agreed by and between them as follows:
 
1.
Settlement Value
 
Within three (3) business days after receipt by Empire Resorts’ counsel of this Agreement executed by Joseph Bernstein, and as a condition of Joseph Bernstein’s obligations under this Agreement becoming effective, Empire Resorts shall:
 
(a)            pay to Joseph Bernstein the sum of One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) by wire transfer to: Joseph Bernstein, Account #                            , Routing #                            , J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,  12 East 86th St., New York, N.Y. 10028, Tel. 212-288-3061; and
 
(b)            issue to Joseph Bernstein Common Stock Purchase Warrants to purchase three million two hundred fifty thousand shares (3,250,000) at $2.00 per share, as follows: (i)  two million (2,000,000) shares in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A, with an expiration date of May 10, 2020; (ii) two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) shares in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit B, with an expiration date of May 10, 2015; and (iii) one million (1,000,000) shares in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit C, with an expiration date of May 10, 2015.
 
The Parties agree that the Settlement Value set forth above relates to the claims and counterclaims in the Empire Resorts Action and each Party will allocate the Settlement Value as they deem appropriate according to their own respective assessments of the values of the claims and counterclaims asserted.
 
Empire Resorts shall have no defense or offset, for any reason whatsoever, to the exercise of any of the options provided for in paragraph 1(b)(ii) and (iii), other than the failure of Joseph Bernstein to pay the exercise price after an exercise within the applicable exercise period and as otherwise stated in the Common Stock Purchase Warrants annexed hereto as Exhibits B and C.
 
 
 

 
 
2.
Reaffirmation of Prior Options
 
Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to affect the options previously issued to Joseph Bernstein to purchase 750,000 shares of Empire Resorts’ common stock, and the parties hereby reaffirm that such options remain vested, in full force and effect, and unaltered by this Agreement, as follows:  Options to purchase five hundred thousand (500,000) shares granted on June 8, 2009, pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated as of June 1, 2009, at an exercise price of $1.78, expiring June 7, 2014; and, options to acquire, pursuant to a stock option agreement dated as of April 27, 2009, two hundred fifty thousand shares (250,000) shares at an exercise price of $1.14, expiring on April 26, 2014.  Empire Resorts shall have no defense or offset, for any reason whatsoever, to the exercise of any of the foregoing options, other than the failure of Joseph Bernstein to pay the exercise price after an exercise within the applicable exercise period.
 
3.
Dismissal of the Empire Resorts Action
 
The Parties will file with the Court the Stipulation and Order, attached as Exhibit D hereto and executed by counsel for all Parties, dismissing the Empire Resorts Action, including all claims, counterclaims, and third-party claims, with prejudice and without costs or attorneys fees.
 
 
 

 
 
4.
Release of Empire Resorts, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew and G. Michael Brown
 
(a)            Joseph Bernstein for himself and for his heirs, executors, affiliates, and assigns, whether as an employee, stockholder or otherwise (hereinafter collectively referred to in this paragraph as the “Releasor”), hereby releases, discharges and acquits forever Empire Resorts and Kien Huat, the direct or indirect beneficial owners of Kien Huat, and each of their respective present and former officers, directors, employees, agents, employee benefit and/or pension plans or funds, trustees, administrators, attorneys, successors, agents, and each of their affiliates and assigns, and Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, and G. Michael Brown and each of their attorneys, successors, agents, and assigns (hereinafter collectively referred to in this paragraph as the “Releasees”) from any and all claims, demands, rights, causes of action, liabilities, and damages whatsoever (“Claims”), whether such Claims are known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent, that the Releasor ever had, or now has, from the beginning of the world to the date of execution of this Agreement against the Releasees, including without limitation any Claims based in any way upon, related in any way to, or arising in any way from, out of or in connection with any agreement (including without limitation the Employment Agreement by and between Empire Resorts and Joseph Bernstein, dated as of June 1, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”), the Option Agreement dated as of April 27, 2009 between Empire Resorts and Joseph Bernstein (the “Option Agreement”) and the Investment Agreement, dated as of August 19, 2009 between Empire Resorts and Kien Huat), understanding, arrangement, transaction, investment, or any other matter that in any way involved, concerned, related to or touched upon Empire Resorts (or its business) or any person or entity affiliated in any way with Releasees and any and all Claims that have been asserted or could have been asserted in the Empire Resorts Action, or arising from or relating to its subject matter.  The releases set forth in this Agreement are not intended to and do not release Releasees from any of their obligations under this Agreement, including without limitation Empire Resorts’ obligations concerning the Common Stock Purchase Warrants and the previously issued stock options reference in paragraph 2 above, nor does this Agreement release Empire Resorts from any indemnification obligations to Joseph Bernstein deriving from his services as a director or officer of Empire Resorts, other than those related to the dispute settled by this Agreement.
 
 
 

 
 
(b)           Without limiting the generality of the foregoing Paragraph 4(a), this Agreement is intended to and shall release the Releasees from any and all Claims arising out of Joseph Bernstein’s employment with Empire Resorts and/or the expiration of Joseph Bernstein’s employment, including but not limited to any Claim(s) under or arising out of (i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; (ii) the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended; (iii) the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) (excluding claims for accrued, vested benefits under any employee benefit plan of Empire Resorts in accordance with the terms of such plan and applicable law); (iv) the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, or the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act; (v) the WARN Act; (vi) the New York State and City Human Rights Laws; (vii) the Delaware Fair Employment Practices Act; (viii) Section 806 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002; (ix) alleged discrimination or retaliation in employment (whether based on federal, state or local law, statutory or decisional); (x) the terms and conditions of Joseph Bernstein’s employment with Empire Resorts, the expiration of such employment, and/or any of the events relating directly or indirectly to or surrounding that expiration, including Claims arising out of or in connection with the Employment Agreement or Option Agreement; (xi) New York Civil Rights Laws; and (xii) any law (statutory or decisional) providing for attorneys’ fees, costs, disbursements and/or the like.  The releases set forth in this Agreement are not intended to and do not release Empire Resorts from any of its obligations under this Agreement.
 
 
 

 
 
(c)           Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent Joseph Bernstein from cooperating in an investigation conducted by the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, to the extent required or permitted by law.  Nevertheless, Joseph Bernstein understands and agrees that he is waiving any right to relief (including, for example, monetary damages, reimbursement of attorney’s fees or reinstatement) with respect to any such investigation.
 
5.
Release of Joseph Bernstein
 
Empire Resorts, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, and G. Michael Brown (hereinafter collectively referred to in this paragraph as the “Releasors”) hereby release, discharge and acquit forever Joseph Bernstein, his heirs and executors (hereinafter collectively referred to in this paragraph as the “Releasee”) from any and all Claims, whether such Claims are known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent, that the Releasors ever had, or now have, from the beginning of the world to the date of execution of this Agreement against the Releasee, including from any and all Claims, whether such Claims are known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent, that the Releasors ever had, or now have, from the beginning of the world to the date of execution of this Agreement against the Releasee, including without limitation any Claims based in any way upon, related in any way to, or arising in any way from, out of, or in connection with any agreement (including without limitation the Employment and the Option Agreement), understanding, arrangement, transaction, investment, or any other matter that in any way involved, concerned, related to or touched upon Empire Resorts (or its business) or any person or entity affiliated in any way with Releasees and any and all Claims that have been asserted or could have been asserted in the Empire Resorts Action, or arising from or relating to its subject matter; provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph is intended to release Joseph Bernstein from his continuing obligations under Section 4 of the Employment Agreement except as specifically set forth in paragraph 6 below.
 
 
 

 
 
6.
Release of Certain Future Obligations of Joseph Bernstein and Rights of Empire Resorts under the Employment Agreement
 
Notwithstanding anything contrary to this Agreement, Empire Resorts hereby releases Joseph Bernstein from all of his obligations under the Employment Agreement, except that
 
(a)           Joseph Bernstein shall not be released from and shall continue to be obligated to comply with Section 4 of the Employment Agreement relating to confidentiality.  With respect to Section 4(B) of the Employment Agreement, counsel for Joseph Bernstein will continue to hold the images made by the third party vendor of Joseph Bernstein’s laptop, iPhone and backup drive for a period of three (3) years, after which they may be destroyed, and, in the event the need arises (including, without limitation, in order to comply with its legal obligations in litigation or to governmental regulatory authorities), shall cooperate with counsel for Empire Resorts to determine a protocol for delivery to Empire Resorts of all materials contained therein that Empire Resorts is entitled to have returned under Section 4(B) of the Employment Agreement and deletion of the same from Mr. Bernstein’s computer and iPhone and any other computer, phone or electronic device used by Mr. Bernstein during his employment by Empire Resorts.  Nothing herein shall require Mr. Bernstein to retain any such information.
 
(b)           For a period of ten (10) years, Joseph Bernstein may not, directly or indirectly, perform services within the Territory (as that term is defined in the Employment Agreement), for the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, whether as an employee, consultant, agent or contractor or in any capacity, and Joseph Bernstein also may not hold office as an officer or director or like positions in the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
 
 
 

 
 
7.
Confidentiality of Settlement and Non-Disparagement
 
(a)            Promptly after execution of this Agreement, Empire Resorts will issue a press release in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit E.  Subject to Paragraph 4(c) above, no party will issue or make any public statement about the Empire Resorts Action, the underlying dispute, or its settlement other than releasing Exhibit E and will respond to any inquiries solely by referring to the press release.
 
(b)           Other than as provided for in Paragraph 4(c) above, and provided that he shall not be prohibited from responding to any legal subpoena or other judicially enforceable written request from any court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction and testifying truthfully pursuant to such subpoena or other request, Joseph Bernstein will not make any statement, written or verbal, or release information, that is injurious to the reputation of Empire Resorts, Kien Huat, the direct or indirect beneficial owners of Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, or G. Michael Brown, and expressly agrees that he shall not, and shall instruct his agents or representatives not to, directly or indirectly, in any capacity or manner, make, express, transmit, speak, write, verbalize or otherwise communicate in any way (or cause, further, assist, solicit, encourage, support or participate in any of the foregoing) to any person not a Party, any remark, comment, message, information, declaration, communication or other statement of any kind, whether oral, in writing, electronically transferred or otherwise, that might reasonably be construed to be derogatory or critical of, or negative toward Empire Resorts, Kien Huat, the direct or indirect beneficial owners of Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, or G. Michael Brown.
 
(c)           Joseph Bernstein further agrees not to make any public statements or encourage others to make any public statements regarding or relating to the business or business practices of Empire Resorts, Kien Huat or the direct or indirect beneficial owners of Kien Huat (including each of their present and former officers, directors, shareholders, direct or indirect beneficial owners, employees, agents, trusts, administrators or affiliates), or regarding or relating to Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, or G. Michael Brown, except as required by law.
 
 
 

 
 
(d)           Each of Empire Resorts, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, and G. Michael Brown shall not make any public statement or release information, that is injurious to the reputation of Joseph Bernstein, and expressly agrees that they shall not, and shall instruct their respective agents or representatives, if any, not to, directly or indirectly, in any capacity or manner, publicly make, express, transmit, speak, write, verbalize or otherwise communicate in any way (or cause, further, assist, solicit, encourage, support or participate in any of the foregoing) to any person not a Party, any remark, comment, message, information, declaration, communication or other statement of any kind, whether oral, in writing, electronically transferred or otherwise, that might reasonably be construed to be derogatory or critical of, or negative toward Joseph Bernstein, provided that they shall not be prohibited from responding to any legal subpoena or other judicially enforceable written request from any court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction, testifying truthfully pursuant to such subpoena or other request, and disclosing such information as is required by any securities laws or rules or regulations promulgated from time to time by the SEC or applicable state securities agencies or as otherwise required by law.
 
 
 

 
 
(e)           Except as otherwise required by law, the Parties (including, but not limited to, their respective attorneys) agree to keep and represent that they have kept confidential:  (i) any and all of the terms of this Agreement, (ii) any and all of the terms proposed during the negotiation process (whether or not accepted), and (iii) the discussions and negotiations that led to this Agreement.  Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the contrary, no provision of this Agreement shall prohibit any party from disclosing or having disclosed the terms of this Agreement to their attorneys, to a tax accountant for purposes of seeking tax advice, or to their spouse, children,  significant other, or executive assistant; and nothing shall prohibit any party from (i) filing any documents required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or applicable state securities agencies or making any other public disclosure required by the federal or state securities law or other applicable law, provided that the content of any document so filed does not violate any of the other terms and conditions of this Agreement unless such content constitutes disclosure required by any securities laws or rules or regulations promulgated from time to time by the SEC or applicable state securities agencies or other applicable law; (ii) filing any documents or disclosing any information required to be filed or disclosed pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the rules and regulations thereunder, any applicable state or local tax code, or the rules and regulations under such state or local code; (iii) responding to any legal subpoena or other judicially enforceable written request from any court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction and testifying truthfully pursuant to such subpoena or other request; or (iv) enforcing any rights of such party under this Agreement.  To the extent any information concerning this Agreement is publicly disclosed pursuant to (i)-(iv) of this paragraph, the obligation of confidentiality as to that information shall no longer apply.  In the event any Party receives any legal subpoena or other judicially enforceable written request from any court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction concerning any matter covered in this Agreement, the party receiving such subpoena or written request shall promptly notify all other parties hereto.  A party shall not produce or disclose any material until a reasonable period of time after such notice is given to counsel for the other parties, to allow the other parties to seek relief from such subpoena or other written request.  In all events in which a party can practically do so without risking contempt or similar sanctions, such party shall provide the other parties with at least seven business days’ notice of such subpoena or written request.
 
 
 

 
 
8.
Non-Interference
 
(a)            Joseph Bernstein agrees not to serve as a named plaintiff in any class action suit against Empire Resorts or Kien Huat, or against each of their present and former officers, directors, stockholders, direct or indirect beneficial owners, employees, agents, employee benefit and/or pension plans or funds, trustees, administrators, attorneys, successors, and each of their affiliates and assigns, or against Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, or G. Michael Brown and each of their successors, agents, or assigns, and except as required by law, agrees not to investigate or assist in any such class action suit.
 
(b)           Joseph Bernstein further agrees to not to serve as legal counsel in any legal action or proceeding against Empire Resorts or Kien Huat, or against each of their present and former officers, directors, employees, agents, employee benefit and/or pension plans or funds, trustees, administrators, attorneys, successors, and each of their affiliates and assigns, where doing so would conflict with his continuing obligations under Section 4 of the Employment Agreement.
 
(c)           For a period of ten (10) years from the date of this Agreement, Joseph Bernstein shall not initiate, directly or indirectly, any communication of any kind with any member of the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe (the “Tribe”) or its counsel.  If a member of the Tribe initiates contact with Joseph Bernstein, he will advise the individual that he cannot communicate with them and will promptly end the communication.  It will not be a violation of this paragraph for Joseph Bernstein to communicate with members of the Tribe with whom he has a personal relationship, including Barbara Lazore or Lorraine White, provided however, that any such communications shall be limited to personal, non-business matters, and Joseph Bernstein expressly agrees to not have any communication with any member of the Tribe that refers or relates to Empire Resorts, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, and G. Michael Brown, and any of the present or former officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents of Empire Resorts or Kien Huat.   Provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph shall inhibit communication with any federal or state governmental official acting in that capacity who is a member of the Tribe.
 
 
 

 
 
9.
Remedies for Breach
 
(a)            The Parties agree that any breach of any of the provisions in Paragraphs 7 and 8 of this Agreement will cause irreparable injury for which there is no adequate remedy at law, and agree that the non-breaching parties, in addition to all other remedies available to them, will be entitled to equitable relief, including but not limited to, injunctive relief to enforce these provisions of the Agreement, without the requirement to post a bond or other security.
 
(b)           Without in any way limiting any of the additional remedies available against him, Joseph Bernstein agrees that in the event he materially breaches any provision of this Agreement: (i) he will be obligated to immediately return to Empire Resorts $250,000 of the Settlement Sum paid to him pursuant to paragraph 1(a) of this Agreement; and (ii) all Common Stock Purchase Warrants issued to Joseph Bernstein pursuant to paragraph 1(b)(i) (Exhibit A hereto) that have not been exercised will terminate immediately.  The remedies provided for in this subparagraph 9(b) are only available if Empire Resorts provides notice to Joseph Bernstein as specified in Paragraph 9(c) below.  Empire Resorts shall be the sole entity entitled to exercise its right to the remedy in this subparagraph with respect to a breach of this Agreement by Joseph Bernstein and may do so with respect to a breach as against any other party.  The Parties expressly agree that the remedies set forth herein are not a penalty, but rather a reasoned amount taking into consideration the anticipated minimum actual harm that may be caused by such a material breach.
 
 
 

 
 
(c)           In the event of a material breach of this Agreement by Joseph Bernstein, and an election by Empire Resorts to assert the remedies provided for under paragraph 9(b), Empire Resorts will provide written notice to Joseph Bernstein within fifteen (15) business days of learning of the material breach.  The written notice provided for herein shall be deemed to have been given if sent by nationally recognized overnight courier to:  Joseph E. Bernstein, 6663 Casa Grande Way, Delray Beach, Florida 33446, with a copy to Henry P. Bubel, Esq., Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, 1133 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036-6710.  Copies of said written notice shall also be sent by nationally recognized overnight courier as follows:
 
If to Kien Huat or Kok Thay Lim, to:
Kien Huat Realty III Limited
c/o Kien Huat Realty Sdn Bhd.
22nd Floor Wisma Genting
Jalan Sultan Ismail
50250 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
Attention:  Gerard Lim

with a copy (which copy alone shall not constitute notice):
 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006
Attention: Steven L. Wilner

The Parties may designate alternate addresses for delivery of notices by sending notice thereof to the addresses set forth above.
 
(d)           If, within 45 (forty-five) days after receiving notice from Empire Resorts pursuant to paragraph 9(c) above, Joseph Bernstein initiates an action to seek a declaration from a court of competent jurisdiction that he has not materially breached this Agreement, the provisions of paragraph 9(b) above will be stayed pending resolution of litigation; provided, however, that the Common Stock Purchase Warrants issued pursuant to paragraph 1(b)(i) (Exhibit A hereto) shall remain unexercisable pending resolution of such action.
 
 
 

 
 
(e)           Without in any way limiting any of the additional remedies available to Joseph Bernstein, the Parties agree that in the event that any of the Releasees as defined in paragraph 4(a) above materially breaches any provision of this Agreement, then paragraph 9(b) above shall become null, void, and of no effect.  The remedies provided for in this subparagraph 9(e) are only available if Joseph Bernstein provides notice to Empire Resorts as specified in Paragraph 9(f) below.  Joseph Bernstein may exercise his right to the remedy in this subparagraph with respect to a material breach of this Agreement by any of the Releasees as defined in paragraph 4(a) above.  The Parties expressly agree that the remedies set forth herein are not a penalty, but rather a reasoned amount taking into consideration the anticipated minimum actual harm that may be caused by such a material breach.
 
(f)           In the event of a material breach of this Agreement by any of the Releasees as defined in paragraph 4(a) above, and an election by Joseph Bernstein to assert the remedies provided for under paragraph 9(e), Joseph Bernstein will provide written notice to Empire Resorts within fifteen (15) business days of learning of the material breach.  The written notice provided for herein shall be deemed to have been given if sent by nationally recognized overnight courier as follows:
 
Empire Resorts, Inc.
P.O. Box 5013
Monticello, New York 12701-5193
Attn: Chief Executive Officer

with copies to the following (which alone shall not constitute notice):
Robert H.Friedman, Esq.
Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenzweig & Wolosky, LLP
65 East 55 th Street
New York, New York 10022
 
 
 

 
 
Kien Huat Realty III Limited
c/o Kien Huat Realty Sdn Bhd.
22nd Floor Wisma Genting
Jalan Sultan Ismail
50250 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
Attention:  Gerard Lim

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006
Attention: Steven L. Wilner

The Parties may designate alternate addresses for delivery of notices by sending notice thereof to the addresses set forth above.
 
(g)           If, within 45 (forty-five) days after receiving notice from Joseph Bernstein pursuant to paragraph 9(f) above, Empire Resorts initiates an action to seek a declaration from a court of competent jurisdiction that there has been no material breach of this Agreement, the provisions of paragraph 9(e) above will be stayed pending resolution of litigation.
 
10.
Miscellaneous
 
(a)            In the event any action suit or other proceeding is instituted to remedy, prevent or obtain relief relating to this Agreement, arising out of a breach of this Agreement, involving claims within the scope of the releases contained in this Agreement, or pertaining to a declaration of rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover all of such party’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in each and every such action, suit or other proceeding, including any and all appeals or petitions therefrom. As used herein, reasonable attorneys’ fees shall be deemed to mean the full and actual reasonable costs of any legal services actually performed in connection with the matters involved, calculated on the basis of the usual fee charged by the attorneys performing such services.
 
 
 

 
 
(b)           The Parties hereto represent and warrant that they have made no assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of any of the Claims released herein and they are fully authorized and entitled to give their full and complete release of all such claims.
 
(c)           In the event that any provision of this Agreement is declared void and unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, all other provisions shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect.
 
(d)           The failure of any Party to this Agreement to insist upon strict adherence to any term of this Agreement will not be considered a waiver of any right arising thereunder or deprive that Party of the right thereafter.
 
(e)           This Agreement shall be in all respects governed by the laws of the State of New York, notwithstanding any rules on conflict or choice of laws that might apply the substantive law of another jurisdiction.
 
(f)           This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, devisees, legatees, executors, administrators, successors, agents, assigns, officers, directors, trustees, agents, partners, employees and affiliates of each of the Parties hereto.
 
(g)           The Parties to this Agreement represent and warrant to each other that they have read and understood its terms, that they have been represented by counsel with respect to this Agreement and all matters covered by and relating to it, that they have been fully advised by counsel with respect to their rights and with respect to the execution of this Agreement and that the Parties have entered into this Agreement for reasons of their own and not based upon the representations of any Party hereto except as contained in this Agreement.  Each Party has participated in, or contributed to, the drafting and preparation of this Agreement, and in the construction of this Agreement, the provisions shall not be construed for, or against, any Party, but shall be construed according to their plain meaning.
 
 
 

 
 
(h)           The Parties understand and agree that this is a compromise settlement of disputed claims and that the furnishing of the consideration for this settlement and release of claims shall not be deemed or construed as an admission of liability.  The making of this Agreement is not intended, and shall not be construed, as an admission that any of the Parties have violated any federal, state, or local law (statutory or decisional), ordinance or regulation, breached any contract, or committed any wrong whatsoever.  The Parties further agree and understand that this Agreement is being entered into solely for the purpose of avoiding further expense and litigation and that this Agreement may not be used as evidence in a subsequent proceeding except in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.
 
(i)           This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and it is expressly understood and agreed that this Agreement may not be altered, amended, modified or otherwise changed in any respect or particular whatsoever except by a writing duly executed by all authorized representatives of all the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge and agree that they will make no claim at any time or place that this Agreement has been orally altered or modified in any respect whatsoever, and the Parties further acknowledge and agree that all other agreements, representations and warranties of any kind are suspended and merged into this Agreement.  This Agreement is not effective until it has been fully executed and delivered by all Parties.
 
(j)           This Agreement may be executed electronically and in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute a duplicate original.
 
 
 

 
 
Signature Page to Agreement and Release
 
 
 
Dated:
May 11, 2010  
/s/ Joseph Bernstein
     
Joseph Bernstein
       
       
Dated:
May 10, 2010  
/s/ Kok Thay Lim
     
Kok Thay Lim
       
       
Dated:
May 10, 2010   
/s/ Colin Au Fook Yew
     
Colin Au Fook Yew
       
       
Dated:
May 12, 2010  
/s/ G. Michael Brown
   
G. Michael Brown

EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.
   
     
By:
/s/ Joseph A. D'Amato  
Date
May 13, 2010
Name:
Joseph A. D'Amato    
Title:
CEO    


KIEN HUAT REALTY III, LIMITED
   
     
By:
/s/ Gerard Lim   
Date
May 10, 2010 
Name:
Gerard Lim    
Title:
Authorized Signatory    
 
 
 

 

Exhibit D
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
 
 
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.,
 
Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
 
v.
 
JOSEPH E. BERNSTEIN,
 
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff..
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case No. 1:10-cv-00110-SHS
 
JOSEPH E. BERNSTEIN,
 
Third-Party Plaintiff,
 
v.
 
AU FOOK YEW, LIM KOK THAY, G. MICHAEL BROWN, KIEN HUAT REALTY III, LIMITED, AND JOHN DOES NO. 1-10.
 
Third-Party Defendants.
 
 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
 
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for plaintiff Empire Resorts, Inc. (“Empire Resorts”), defendant Joseph Bernstein, third-party defendants Kien Huat Realty III, Limited (“Kien Huat”), Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew, and G. Michael Brown (collectively, the “Parties”) that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the Parties, by their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of the claims asserted by plaintiff Empire Resorts against defendant Joseph Bernstein and to the counter claims and third-party claims asserted by Joseph Bernstein against Empire Resorts, Kien Huat, Kok Thay Lim, Colin Au Fook Yew and G. Michael Brown, without costs.
 
 
 

 
Dated:    New York, New York
 
May __, 2010
 
 
 
 
Lori Marks-Esterman
 
OLSHAN GRUNDMAN FROME ROSENZWEIG & WOLOSKY LLP
 
Attorney for Empire Resorts, Inc., G.   Michael Brown and Colin Au Fook Yew
   
Park Avenue Tower
65 East 55 th Street
New York, New York 10022
(212) 451-2300


 
 
 
Kim J. Landsman
 
PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP
 
Attorney for Joseph Bernstein
   
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6710
(212) 336-2000


 
 
 
Howard Zelbo
 
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
 
Attorney for Kien Huat & Kok Thay Lim
   
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6710
(212) 336-2000
 
SO ORDERED on May    , 2010,
   
     
     
 
   
The Honorable Sidney H. Stein
United States District Judge
   

Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
I, Joseph A. D’Amato, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Empire Resorts, Inc.;
 
2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.           I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
(b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5.           I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Dated:  May 17, 2010
 
/s/ Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Joseph A. D’Amato
   
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 
 
Exhibit 32.1
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Empire Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Joseph A. D’Amato, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:
 
(1)           The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
(2)           The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
Date: May 17, 2010
 
 
By:
/s/ Joseph A. D’Amato
 
Joseph A. D’Amato
 
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Empire Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Empire Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.