FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORP (Form: 10-K, Received: 02/28/2007 14:55:21)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

S ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
- or -
£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 001-15185

FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TENNESSEE		62-0803242
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

165 Madison Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee		38103
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including Area Code: 901-523-4444

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class		Name of Exchange on which Registered
$0.625 Par Value Common Capital Stock		New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
(including rights attached thereto)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. X YES NO

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. X YES NO

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
X Large Accelerated Filer ___ Accelerated Filer ___ Non-Accelerated Filer

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES X NO

At June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $4.9 billion.

At January 31, 2007, the registrant had 125,330,266 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the 2006 Annual Report to shareholders – Parts I, II, and IV

Portions of Proxy Statement to be furnished to shareholders in connection with Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for 4/17/07– Part III

PART I

Note on Page Number References

In this report, references to specific pages in the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, or to specific pages of its consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, relate to page numbers appearing in Exhibit 13 to this report. The Exhibit 13 page numbers do not necessarily correspond to page numbers appearing in the printed 2006 Annual Report to shareholders.

ITEM 1
BUSINESS

General.

First Horizon National Corporation (the “Corporation,” “we,” or “us”) is a Tennessee corporation headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee and incorporated in 1968. The Corporation is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is a financial holding company under the provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. At December 31, 2006, the Corporation had total assets of $37.9 billion and ranked 1 ^st in terms of total assets among Tennessee-headquartered bank holding companies and ranked 27 ^th nationally.

Through its principal subsidiary, First Tennessee Bank National Association (the “Bank”), and its other banking-related subsidiaries, the Corporation provides diversified financial services through four business segments. The segments reflect the common activities and operations of aggregated business segments across the various delivery channels: Retail/Commercial Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Capital Markets. In addition, the Corporate segment provides essential support within the Corporation. The percentage of consolidated revenues (for this purpose, the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) ascribed to each of our segments for the past three years was: Retail/Commercial Banking, 63% (2006), 56% (2005), and 51% (2004); Mortgage Banking, 22% (2006), 28% (2005), and 29% (2004); Capital Markets, 17% (2006), 15% (2005), and 18% (2004); and Corporate, (2)% (2006), 1% (2005), and 2% (2004). Financial and other additional information concerning our segments appears in the response to Item 7 of Part II hereof and Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders. During 2006 approximately 54% of revenues were provided by fee income and approximately 46% of revenues were provided by net interest income. As a financial holding company, the Corporation coordinates the financial resources of the consolidated enterprise and maintains systems of financial, operational and administrative control intended to coordinate selected policies and activities, including as described in Item 9A of Part II hereto.

The Bank is a national banking association with principal offices in Memphis, Tennessee. It received its charter in 1864. During 2006 through its various business lines, including consolidated subsidiaries, the Bank generated gross revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income) of approximately $2.2 billion and contributed substantially all of consolidated net income from continuing operations. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had $37.6 billion in total assets, $20.2 billion in total deposits, and $21.9 billion in total net loans. Among Tennessee headquartered banks, the Bank ranked 1 ^st in Tennessee deposit market share at June 30, 2006.

On December 31, 2006, the Corporation’s subsidiaries had over 600 business locations in 46 states, excluding off-premises ATMs. Most of those locations were bank financial centers, mortgage offices, national construction offices, and FTN Financial offices. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had 229 financial centers (sometimes referred to as financial center level 5, or FC5, bank branch locations) in six states: 187 FC5s in 17 Tennessee counties, including all of the major metropolitan areas of the state; 11 FC5s in Georgia; 4 FC5s in Maryland; 8 FC5s in Mississippi; 10 FC5s in Texas; and 9 FC5s in Virginia. Nearly all FC5 bank branch locations have on-premises ATMs. The Bank also has off-premises ATMs in its banking markets as well as in several mortgage offices. At December 31, 2006, First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, a subsidiary of the Bank with principal offices in the Dallas, Texas metropolitan area, and its affiliates provided mortgage banking services through 356 offices in 45 states. These offices include 40 national construction offices, as well as satellite branches. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation ranked in the top 25 nationally in mortgage loan originations,

and in the top 20 nationally in mortgage loan servicing, at December 31, 2006 as reported by Inside Mortgage Finance . Many banking products and services are offered through many of the mortgage offices, though some products and services are available only through the Bank’s FC5 locations. FTN Financial products and services, at December 31, 2006, were offered through 18 offices in 15 states, and FTN Financial Capital Markets, a division of the Bank, ranked as one of the leading underwriters of U.S. agency debt.

At December 31, 2006, the Corporation provided the following services through its subsidiaries:

general banking services for consumers, businesses, financial institutions, and governments

mortgage banking services

through FTN Financial – sales, trading, and underwriting of bank-eligible securities and other fixed-income securities eligible for underwriting by financial subsidiaries; distribution of mortgage loans; advisory services; equity sales, trading, and research; and various investment banking services

transaction processing – nationwide check clearing services and remittance processing

trust, fiduciary, and agency services

credit card products

discount brokerage and full-service brokerage

venture capital

equipment finance

investment and financial advisory services

mutual fund sales as agent

retail and commercial insurance sales as agent

private mortgage reinsurance

services related to health savings accounts

An element of the Corporation’s business strategy is to seek acquisitions and consider divestitures that would enhance long-term shareholder value. The Corporation has a department charged with this responsibility which is constantly reviewing and developing opportunities to achieve this element of the Corporation’s strategy. Acquisitions and divestitures which closed during the past three years are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

All of the Corporation’s operating subsidiaries are listed in Exhibit 21. The Bank has filed notice with the Comptroller of the Currency (“Comptroller” or “OCC”) as a government securities broker/dealer. The FTN Financial Capital Markets division of the Bank is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as a municipal securities dealer. The Bank is supervised and regulated as described below. Highland Capital Management Corp., Martin and Company, Inc., First Tennessee Advisory Services, a separately identifiable department of the Bank, FTN Midwest Asset Management Corp., and First Tennessee Brokerage, Inc. are registered with the SEC as investment advisers. Hickory Venture Capital Corporation is licensed as a Small Business Investment Company. First Tennessee Brokerage, Inc., FTN Financial Securities Corp. and FTN Midwest Securities Corp. are registered as broker-dealers with the SEC and all states where they conduct business for which registration is required. Pursuant to federal law, First Horizon Home Loan Corporation is regulated by the Comptroller and, under regulations promulgated by the Comptroller, is exempt from licensing as a mortgage lender in all states where it does business. First Tennessee Insurance Services, Inc. (“FTIS”) and First Horizon Insurance Services, Inc. (“FHIS”) are licensed as insurance agencies in all states where they do business for which licensing is

required. FT Reinsurance Company is licensed by the state of South Carolina as a monoline insurance company. FT Insurance Corporation is licensed as an insurance agency in Alabama. Synaxis Group, Inc.’s subsidiaries, which include Polk & Sullivan Group, Inc., Synaxis Insurance Services, Inc., Synaxis Risk Services, Inc., and Merritt & McKenzie, Inc., are licensed as insurance agencies in all states where they do business for which licensing is required. FTN Financial Securities Corp., FTN Midwest Securities Corp., FTN Midwest Asset Management Corp., FHIS, FTIS, and all of the subsidiaries listed in the preceding sentence are financial subsidiaries under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. First Tennessee Brokerage, Inc. is licensed as an insurance agency in the states where it does business for which licensing is required for the sale of annuity products.

Expenditures for research and development activities were not material in any of the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2006.

Neither the Corporation nor any of its significant subsidiaries is dependent upon a single customer or very few customers.

The Corporation does not experience material seasonality. The Corporation does experience a degree of seasonal variation in revenues and expenses associated primarily with its mortgage banking business, with the result that pre-tax earnings for that business typically are somewhat lower in the late fall and winter and somewhat higher in the late spring and summer.

At December 31, 2006, the corporation and its subsidiaries had 12,398 employees, or 12,131 full-time-equivalent employees, not including contract labor for certain services.

For additional information on the business of the Corporation, refer to the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and Glossary sections contained in pages 3 through 52 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.

The Corporation’s current internet address is www.fhnc.com. The Corporation makes available free of charge on its Internet website its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments thereto as soon as reasonably practicable after the Corporation files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, as applicable.

Supervision and Regulation.

The following summary sets forth certain of the material elements of the regulatory framework applicable to bank holding companies and financial holding companies and their subsidiaries and to companies engaged in securities and insurance activities and provides certain specific information about the Corporation. The bank regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the Federal Deposit Insurance Funds and not for the protection of security holders. In addition, certain activities of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to various securities and insurance laws and are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the state insurance departments of the states in which they operate. To the extent that the following information describes statutory and regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by express reference to each of the particular statutory and regulatory provisions. A change in applicable statutes, regulations or regulatory policy may have a material effect on the business of the Corporation.

General

The Corporation is a bank holding company and financial holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”) and is registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). The Corporation is subject to the regulation and supervision of and examination by the Federal Reserve under the BHCA. The Corporation is required to file with the Federal Reserve annual reports and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require pursuant to the BHCA.

Under the BHCA, prior to March 13, 2000, bank holding companies could not in general directly or indirectly acquire the ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of any company, including a bank, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve, and a bank holding company and its subsidiaries were generally limited to engaging in banking and activities found by the Federal Reserve to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. Since March 13, 2000, eligible bank holding companies that elect to become financial holding companies may affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in activities that are “financial in nature” generally without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve. See “Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act” below.

In addition, the BHCA permits the Federal Reserve to approve an application by a bank holding company to acquire a bank located outside the acquirer’s principal state of operations without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited under state law. See “Interstate Banking and Branching Legislation.” The Tennessee Bank Structure Act of 1974, among other things, prohibits (subject to certain exceptions) a bank holding company from acquiring a bank for which the home state is Tennessee (a “Tennessee bank”) if, upon consummation, the company would directly or indirectly control 30% or more of the total deposits in insured depository institutions in Tennessee. As of June 30, 2006, the Corporation estimates that it held approximately 20.7% of such deposits. Subject to certain exceptions, the Tennessee Bank Structure Act prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring a bank in Tennessee which has been in operation for less than three years. Tennessee law permits a Tennessee bank to establish branches in any county in Tennessee. See also “- Interstate Banking and Branching Legislation” below.

The Bank is a national banking association subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the Comptroller as its primary federal regulator. In addition, the Bank is insured by, and subject to regulation by, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). The Bank is also subject to various requirements and restrictions under federal and state law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be granted and the interest that may be charged thereon and limitations on the types of investments that may be made, activities that may be engaged in, and types of services that may be offered. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of the Bank. In addition to the impact of regulation, commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of the Federal Reserve as it attempts to control the money supply and credit availability in order to influence the economy.

Payment of Dividends

The Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from its banking and other subsidiaries. The principal source of cash flow of the Corporation, including cash flow to pay dividends on its stock or principal (premium, if any) and interest on debt securities, is dividends from the Bank. There are statutory and regulatory limitations on the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Corporation, as well as by the Corporation to its shareholders.

As a national bank, the Bank is required by federal law to obtain the prior approval of the Comptroller for the payment of dividends if the total of all dividends declared by the board of directors of the Bank in any year will exceed the total of (i) its net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for that year plus (ii) the retained net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. A national bank also can pay dividends only to the extent that retained net profits (including the portion transferred to surplus) exceed bad debts (as defined by regulation).

If, in the opinion of the applicable federal bank regulatory authority, a depository institution or a holding company is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the depository institution or holding company, could include the payment of dividends), such authority may require that such institution or holding company cease and desist from such practice. The federal banking agencies have indicated that paying dividends that deplete a depository institution’s or holding company’s capital base to an inadequate level would be such an unsafe and unsound banking practice. Moreover, the Federal Reserve, the Comptroller and the FDIC have issued policy statements which provide that bank holding companies and insured depository institutions generally should only pay dividends out of current operating earnings.

In addition, under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”), an FDIC-insured depository institution may not make any capital distributions (including the payment of dividends) or pay any management fees to its holding company or pay any dividend if it is undercapitalized or if such payment would cause it to become undercapitalized.

At December 31, 2006, under dividend restrictions imposed under applicable federal laws, the Bank, without obtaining regulatory approval, could legally declare aggregate dividends of approximately $642.7 million.

Under Tennessee law, the Corporation is not permitted to pay dividends if, after giving effect to such payment, it would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business or the Corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus any amounts needed to satisfy any preferential rights if the Corporation was dissolving.

The payment of dividends by the Corporation and the Bank may also be affected or limited by other factors, such as the requirement to maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines and debt covenants.

Transactions with Affiliates

There are various legal restrictions on the extent to which the Corporation and its nonbank subsidiaries (including for purposes of this paragraph, in certain situations, subsidiaries of the Bank) can borrow or otherwise obtain credit from the Bank. There are also legal restrictions on the Bank’s purchases of or investments in the securities of and purchases of assets from the Corporation and its nonbank subsidiaries, the Bank’s loans or extensions of credit to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of the Corporation and its nonbank subsidiaries, the issuance of guaranties, acceptances and letters of credit on behalf of the Corporation and its nonbank subsidiaries, and certain bank transactions with the Corporation and its nonbank subsidiaries, or with respect to which the Corporation and its nonbank subsidiaries act as agent, participate or have a financial interest. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the Bank (including for purposes of this paragraph all subsidiaries of the Bank) may not extend credit to the Corporation or to any other affiliate (other than another subsidiary bank and certain exempted affiliates) in an amount which exceeds 10% of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus and may not extend credit in the aggregate to all such affiliates in an amount which exceeds 20% of its capital

stock and surplus. Further, there are legal requirements as to the type, amount and quality of collateral which must secure such extensions of credit by the Bank to the Corporation or to such other affiliates. Also, extensions of credit and other transactions between the Bank and the Corporation or such other affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that are substantially the same or at least as favorable to the Bank as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. Also, the Bank and certain of its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with extensions of credit, leases or sales of property, or furnishing of services.

Capital Adequacy

The Federal Reserve has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies. The minimum guideline for the ratio of total capital (“Total Capital”) to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance-sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%, and the minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital (defined below) to risk-weighted assets is 4%. At least half of the Total Capital must be composed of common stock, minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities, less any amounts of goodwill, other intangible assets, and other items that are required to be deducted (“Tier 1 Capital”). The remainder may consist of qualifying subordinated debt, certain types of mandatory convertible securities and perpetual debt, other preferred stock and a limited amount of loan loss reserves. At December 31, 2006, the Corporation’s consolidated Total Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were 13.21% and 8.87%, respectively.

The Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, and the OCC have adopted rules to incorporate market and interest-rate risk components into their risk-based capital standards and that explicitly identify concentration of credit risk and certain risks arising from non-traditional activities, and the management of such risks, as important factors to consider in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. Under the market risk requirements, capital is allocated to support the amount of market risk related to a financial institution’s ongoing trading activities for banks with relatively large trading activities. Institutions are able to satisfy any additional capital requirement, in part, by issuing short-term subordinated debt that qualifies as Tier 3 capital. Based on present practices and activity levels, these trading-related market risk rules have no significant impact on the Corporation’s regulatory capital requirements.

In addition, the Federal Reserve has established minimum leverage ratio guidelines for bank holding companies. These guidelines provide for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to quarterly average assets, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (the “Leverage Ratio”), of 3% for bank holding companies that meet certain specific criteria, including having the highest regulatory rating. All other bank holding companies generally are required to maintain a Leverage Ratio of at least 3%, plus an additional cushion of 100 to 200 basis points. The Corporation’s Leverage Ratio at December 31, 2006, was 6.94%. The guidelines also provide that bank holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without significant reliance on intangible assets. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve has indicated that it will consider a “tangible Tier 1 Capital leverage ratio” (deducting all intangibles) and other indicia of capital strength in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities.

The Bank is subject to risk-based and leverage capital requirements similar to those described above adopted by the Comptroller. The Corporation believes that the Bank was in compliance with applicable minimum capital requirements as of December 31, 2006. Neither the Corporation nor the Bank has been advised by any federal banking agency of any specific minimum Leverage Ratio requirement applicable to it.

Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and to certain restrictions on its business and in certain circumstances to the appointment of a conservator or receiver. See “––Prompt Corrective Action” at page 8.

In 1999, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision launched its efforts to develop an improved capital adequacy framework by issuing its proposals to revise the 1988 Capital Accord. The new capital framework (Basel II) would consist of minimum capital requirements, a supervisory review process, and the effective use of market discipline. Basel II would seek to ensure that a bank’s capital position is consistent with its overall risk profile and strategy, encourage early supervisory intervention when a bank’s capital position deteriorates, and call for detailed disclosure of a bank’s capital adequacy and how it evaluates its own capital adequacy.

In June 2004, the Basel Committee issued its final framework. In September 2006 the U.S. regulators published a revised Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Basel II. Under the proposed rules the Corporation would not be considered a core bank that would be required to implement the new rules but could evaluate whether to opt in. For those non-core banks that do not opt in, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) was issued in December 2006, known as Basel IA, which proposed certain revision to the current Basel I capital rules. The regulators have coordinated the issuance of the Basel II NPR with the issuance of a Basel IA NPR in a manner that will allow for some overlap in the comment period through March 2007 to allow the effects of the two proposals to be evaluated side by side. The Corporation cannot predict at this time the final form the U.S. Regulators’ rules will take, or the effect they would have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Bank or the Corporation. The Corporation intends to continue to monitor the evolution of the proposed rulemaking and its potential impacts to the Corporation and the industry.

Holding Company Structure and Support of Subsidiary Banks

Because the Corporation is a holding company, its right to participate in the assets of any subsidiary upon the latter’s liquidation or reorganization will be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors (including depositors in the case of the Bank) except to the extent that the Corporation may itself be a creditor with recognized claims against the subsidiary. In addition, depositors of a bank, and the FDIC as their subrogee, would be entitled to priority over the creditors in the event of liquidation of a bank subsidiary.

Under Federal Reserve policy, the Corporation is expected to act as a source of financial strength to, and to commit resources to support, the Bank. This support may be required at times when, absent such Federal Reserve policy, the Corporation may not be inclined to provide it. In addition, any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment.

Cross-Guarantee Liability

Under the FDIA, a depository institution insured by the FDIC can be held liable for any loss incurred by, or reasonably expected to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with (i) the default of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution or (ii) any assistance provided by the FDIC to any commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution “in danger of default.” “Default” is

defined generally as the appointment of a conservator or receiver and “in danger of default” is defined generally as the existence of certain conditions indicating that a default is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance. The FDIC’s claim for damages is superior to claims of shareholders of the insured depository institution or its holding company but is subordinate to claims of depositors, secured creditors and holders of subordinated debt (other than affiliates) of the commonly controlled insured depository institution. The Bank is currently the only depository institution owned by the Corporation. In the event that the Corporation established or acquired another depository institution, any loss suffered by the FDIC in respect of one subsidiary bank would likely result in assertion of the cross-guarantee provisions, the assessment of such estimated losses against the Corporation’s other subsidiary bank(s), and a potential loss of the Corporation’s investment in such subsidiary bank.

Prompt Corrective Action

The FDIA requires, among other things, the federal banking regulators to take “prompt corrective action” in respect of FDIC-insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. Under the FDIA, insured depository institutions are divided into five capital tiers: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” Under applicable regulations, an institution is defined to be well capitalized if it maintains a Leverage Ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6% and a Total Capital ratio of at least 10% and is not subject to a directive, order or written agreement to meet and maintain specific capital levels. An institution is defined to be adequately capitalized if it meets all of its minimum capital requirements as described above. An institution will be considered undercapitalized if it fails to meet any minimum required measure, significantly undercapitalized if it has a Total Risk-Based Capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio of less than 3% or a Leverage Ratio of less than 3% and critically undercapitalized if it fails to maintain a level of tangible equity equal to at least 2% of total assets. An institution may be deemed to be in a capitalization category that is lower than is indicated by its actual capital position if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating.

The FDIA generally prohibits an FDIC-insured depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of dividends) or paying any management fee to its holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. Undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to restrictions on borrowing from the Federal Reserve System. In addition, undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans. An insured depository institution’s holding company must guarantee the capital plan, up to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s assets at the time it becomes undercapitalized or the amount of the capital deficiency when the institution fails to comply with the plan, for the plan to be accepted by the applicable federal regulatory authority. The federal banking agencies may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository institution’s capital. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized.

Significantly undercapitalized depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. Critically undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator, generally within 90 days of the date on which they become critically undercapitalized.

The Corporation believes that at December 31, 2006, the Bank had sufficient capital to qualify as “well capitalized” under the regulatory capital requirements discussed above.

Interstate Banking and Branching Legislation

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “IBBEA”) authorized two methods of interstate expansion by banks and bank holding companies without geographic limitation.

According to IBBEA, a bank may merge with a bank in another state and continue to operate the merged bank’s branches as interstate branches. IBBEA allowed states to opt out of allowing the operation of interstate branches pursuant to merger transactions, if they did so by May 31, 1997. Two states, Texas and Montana, enacted such opt-out legislation, but both of these states have since enacted legislation to allow interstate branching through merger transactions. Tennessee did not opt out of interstate branching.

For merger transactions, states may impose restrictions on such transactions. Many states have requirements for a minimum period of time that a bank must have been in existence before a merger is allowed. According to IBBEA, the maximum period allowed for such age restrictions is five years. Additionally, national and state deposit concentration limits apply to interstate mergers.

IBBEA also provides that a bank may establish and operate a de novo branch or acquire an existing branch in a state in which a bank is not headquartered and does not maintain a branch if the host state permits de novo branching. Various states permit de novo branching, and some states require reciprocal branching statutes to allow de novo branching. Tennessee permits de novo branching on a reciprocal basis.

Once a bank has established branches in a state through an interstate merger transaction or through de novo branching, the bank may then establish and acquire additional branches within that state to the same extent that a state chartered bank is allowed to establish or acquire branches within the state.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 repealed or modified a number of significant provisions of then-current laws, including the Glass-Steagall Act and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, which imposed restrictions on banking organizations’ ability to engage in certain types of activities. The Act generally allows bank holding companies such as the Corporation broad authority to engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to such a financial activity, including insurance underwriting and brokerage; merchant banking; securities underwriting, dealing and market-making; real estate development; and such additional activities as the Federal Reserve in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury determines to be financial in nature or incidental thereto. A bank holding company may engage in these activities directly or through subsidiaries by qualifying as a “financial holding company.” To qualify a bank holding company must file a declaration with the Federal Reserve and certify that all of its subsidiary depository institutions are well-managed and well-capitalized. The Act also permits national banks such as the Bank to engage in certain of these activities through financial subsidiaries. To control or hold an interest in a financial subsidiary, a national bank must meet the following requirements: (1) the national bank must receive approval from the Comptroller for the financial subsidiary to engage in the activities, (2) the national bank and its depository institution affiliates must each be well-capitalized and well-managed, (3) the aggregate consolidated total assets of all of the national bank’s financial subsidiaries must not exceed 45% of the national bank’s consolidated total assets or, if less, $50 billion, (4) the national bank must have in place adequate policies and procedures to identify and manage financial and operational risks and to preserve the separate identities and limited liability of the national bank and the financial subsidiary, and (5) if the financial subsidiary will engage in principal transactions and the national bank is one of the one hundred largest banks, the national bank must have outstanding at

least one issue of unsecured long-term debt that is currently rated in one of the three highest investment grade rating categories (or if in the second fifty largest banks, an alternative requirement is that the national bank has a current long-term issuer credit rating within the three highest investment grade rating categories). No new financial activity may be commenced under the Act unless the national bank and all of its depository institution affiliates have at least “satisfactory” CRA ratings. Certain restrictions apply if the bank holding company or the national bank fails to continue to meet one or more of the requirements listed above. In addition, the Act contains a number of other provisions that may affect the Bank’s operations, including functional regulation of the Bank’s securities and investment management operations by the SEC and the Bank’s insurance operations by the States and limitations on the use and disclosure to third parties of customer information. The Corporation is a financial holding company and the Bank has a number of financial subsidiaries.

FDIC Insurance Assessments; DIFA

The Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) was formed in March 2006 when the FDIC merged the Bank Insurance Fund with the Savings Association Insurance Fund pursuant to the the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (“2005 Reform Act”). The FDIC insurance premium charged on bank deposits insured by the DIF ranged from 0 to 27 cents per $100 of deposits, depending on the institution’s risk classification, based on capital and supervisory risk factors. In late 2006 the FDIC adopted new regulations that change the risk category and DIF premium structures beginning in 2007. The new rates are based on four new Risk Categories that in turn are based on asset size as well as capital, supervisory, credit, and other risk factors. Somewhat different factors are used for institutions in different situations. The new rates range from 5 to 7 cents per $100 of deposits for institutions in Risk Category I, up to 43 cents for institutions in Risk Category IV. As part of the 2005 Reform Act, Congress provided credits to certain institutions that paid high premiums in the past to bolster the FDIC’s insurance reserves; as a result, an institution may have credits reduce or eliminate DIF premiums in 2007.

The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 (“DIFA”) provides for assessments to be imposed on insured depository institutions with respect to deposits insured by the DIF to pay for the cost of Financing Corporation (“FICO”) bonds. All banks are assessed to pay the interest due on FICO bonds. The FICO assessment cost to the Corporation on an annual basis is immaterial.

Under the FDIA, insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by a federal bank regulatory agency.

Depositor Preference

Federal law provides that deposits and certain claims for administrative expenses and employee compensation against an insured depository institution would be afforded a priority over other general unsecured claims against such an institution, including federal funds and letters of credit, in the “liquidation or other resolution” of such an institution by any receiver.

Securities Regulation

Certain of the Corporation’s subsidiaries are subject to various securities laws and regulations and capital adequacy requirements promulgated by the regulatory and exchange authorities of the jurisdictions in which they operate.

The Corporation’s registered broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the SEC’s net capital rule, Rule 15c3-1. That rule requires the maintenance of minimum net capital and limits the ability of the broker-dealer to transfer large amounts of capital to a parent company or affiliate. Compliance with the rule could limit operations that require intensive use of capital, such as underwriting and trading.

Certain of the Corporation’s subsidiaries and a division of the Bank are registered investment advisers who are regulated under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Advisory contracts with clients automatically terminate under these laws upon an assignment of the contract by the investment adviser unless appropriate consents are obtained.

In early 2007, the SEC and Federal Reserve Board proposed regulations that would expand significantly the SEC’s ability to regulate securities businesses conducted by banks and their subsidiaries. Regulation by the SEC could affect how the Corporation conducts those businesses in the future. Those regulations were proposed in response to a Congressional mandate in the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006.

Insurance Activities

Subsidiaries of the Corporation sell various types of insurance as agent in a number of the states. Insurance activities are subject to regulation by the states in which such business is transacted. Although most of such regulation focuses on insurance companies and their insurance products, insurance agents and their activities are also subject to regulation by the states, including, among other things, licensing and marketing and sales practices.

Competition.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries face substantial competition in all aspects of the businesses in which they engage from national and state banks located in Tennessee and large out-of-state and non-U.S. banks as well as from savings and loan associations, credit unions, other financial institutions, consumer finance companies, trust companies, investment counseling firms, money market and other mutual funds, insurance companies and agencies, securities firms, mortgage banking companies, and others. For certain information on the competitive position of the Corporation and the Bank, refer to the “General” subsection above of this Item 1. Also, refer to the subsections entitled “Supervision and Regulation” and “Effect of Governmental Policies,” both of which are relevant to an analysis of the Corporation’s competitors. Due to the intense competition in the financial services industry, the Corporation makes no representation that its competitive position has remained constant, nor can it predict whether its position will change in the future.

Sources and Availability of Funds.

Specific reference is made to the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Glossary sections, including the subsection entitled “Liquidity Management,” contained in pages 3 through 52 (including pages 25 through 28) of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Effect of Governmental Policies.

The Bank is affected by the policies of regulatory authorities, including the Federal Reserve System and the Comptroller. An important function of the Federal Reserve System is to regulate the national money supply.

Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the Federal Reserve are: purchases and sales of U.S. Government securities in the marketplace; changes in the discount rate, which is the rate any depository institution must pay to borrow from the Federal Reserve; and changes in the reserve requirements of depository institutions. These instruments are effective in influencing economic and monetary growth, interest rate levels and inflation.

The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve System and other governmental policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. Because of changing conditions in the national and international economy and in the money market, as well as the result of actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, it is not possible to predict with certainty future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or the business and earnings of the Corporation and the Bank or whether the changing economic conditions will have a positive or negative effect on operations and earnings.

Various bills are from the time to time introduced in the United States Congress and the Tennessee General Assembly and other state legislatures, and regulations are proposed by the regulatory agencies which could affect the business of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. It cannot be predicted whether or in what form any of these proposals will be adopted or the extent to which the business of the Corporation and its subsidiaries may be affected thereby.

Statistical Information Required by Guide 3.

The statistical information required to be displayed under Item I pursuant to Guide 3, “Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies,” of the Exchange Act Industry Guides is incorporated herein by reference to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and Glossary sections set forth at pages 3 through 52 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders. Certain information not contained in the 2006 Annual Report to shareholders, but required by Guide 3, is contained in the tables immediately following:

FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
ADDITIONAL GUIDE 3 STATISTICAL INFORMATION
ON DECEMBER 31
(Unaudited)

Investment Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004
Government agency issued
mortgage-backed securities &
collateralized mortgage obligations	$	3,340,864	$	2,525,865	$	2,391,162
U.S. Treasuries		50,363		41,113		41,244
Other U.S. government agencies*		245,140		133,918		40,959
States and municipalities		1,769		2,525		8,268
Other		252,284		209,065		199,364
Total	$	3,890,420	$	2,912,486	$	2,680,997
* Includes securities issued by government sponsored entities which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

Loan Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004		2003		2002
Commercial:
Commercial, financial and industrial	$	7,201,009	$	6,578,117	$	5,560,736	$	4,502,917	$	4,134,158
Real estate commercial		1,136,590		1,213,052		960,178		968,064		1,037,341
Real estate construction		2,753,458		2,108,121		1,208,703		690,402		551,449
Retail:
Real estate residential		7,973,313		8,368,219		7,259,019		6,847,924		4,745,675
Real estate construction		2,085,133		1,925,060		1,035,562		527,260		342,127
Other retail		161,178		168,413		168,806		212,362		286,069
Credit card receivables		203,307		251,016		248,972		272,398		272,994
Real estate loans pledged against other
collaterized borrowings		590,917		-		-		-		-
Total	$	22,104,905	$	20,611,998	$	16,441,976	$	14,021,327	$	11,369,813
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.


Short-Term Borrowings
(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase	$	4,961,799	$	3,735,742	$	3,247,048
Commercial paper		5,619		10,695		23,712
Trading liabilities		789,957		793,638		426,343
Other short-term borrowings		1,252,894		791,322		116,064
Total	$	7,010,269	$	5,331,397	$	3,813,167



Maturities of Certificates of Deposit $100,000 and more on December 31, 2006


	0-3		3-6		6-12		Over 12
(Dollars in thousands)	Months		Months		Months		Months		Total
Certificates of deposit
$100,000 and more	$	4,974,798	$	198,446	$	161,715	$	1,182,670	$	6,517,629

Contractual Maturities of Commercial & Real Estate Construction Loans on December 31, 2006

			After 1 Year
(Dollars in thousands)	Within 1 Year		Within 5 Years		After 5 Years		Total
Commercial, financial and industrial	$	4,152,418	$	2,422,492	$	626,099	$	7,201,009
Real estate commercial		415,970		568,088		152,532		1,136,590
Commercial real estate construction		2,075,577		677,881		-		2,753,458
Retail real estate construction		2,070,235		14,898		-		2,085,133
Total	$	8,714,200	$	3,683,359	$	778,631	$	13,176,190
For maturities over one year:
Interest rates - floating			$	2,272,507	$	368,021	$	2,640,528
Interest rates - fixed				1,410,852		410,610		1,821,462
Total			$	3,683,359	$	778,631	$	4,461,990

ITEM 1A
RISK FACTORS

This item outlines specific risks that could affect the ability of our various businesses to compete, change our risk profile, or eventually impact our financial results. The risks we face generally are similar to those experienced, to varying degrees, by all financial services companies.

Our strategies and management’s ability to react to changing competitive and economic environments have enabled us historically to compete effectively and manage risks to acceptable levels. However, our operating environment continues to evolve and new risks continue to emerge. To address that challenge we have established an enterprise-wide risk management committee that oversees processes for monitoring evolving risks and oversees various initiatives designed to manage and control our potential exposure.

We have outlined potential risk factors below that we presently believe could be important to us; however, other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time and we cannot predict with certainty all potential developments which could affect our financial performance. The following discussion highlights potential risks which could intensify over time or shift dynamically in a way that might change our risk profile. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this report (including the material incorporated into this report), among the factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from our past results and from expectations are those discussed in this item.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report, including materials incorporated into it, may contain forward-looking statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, goals, expectations, and estimates. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not a representation of historical information but rather are related to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “should,” “is likely,” “will,” “going forward,” and other expressions that indicate future events and trends identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, operational, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond any company's control, and many of which, with respect to

future business decisions and actions (including acquisitions and divestitures), are subject to change. Examples of uncertainties and contingencies include, among other important factors: general and local economic and business conditions; expectations of and actual timing and amount of interest rate movements, including the slope of the yield curve, which can have a significant impact on a financial services institution; market and monetary fluctuations; inflation or deflation; investor responses to these conditions; the financial condition of borrowers and other counterparties; competition within and outside the financial services industry; geopolitical developments including possible terrorist activity; natural disasters; effectiveness of our hedging practices; technology; demand for our product offerings; new products and services in the industries in which we operate; and critical accounting estimates.

Other factors are those inherent in originating and servicing loans including prepayment risks, pricing concessions, fluctuation in U.S. housing prices, fluctuation of collateral values, and changes in customer profiles. Additionally, the actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and its affiliates, and other regulators; regulatory, administrative, and judicial proceedings and changes in laws and regulations applicable to us; and our success in executing our business plans and strategies and managing the risks involved in the foregoing, could cause actual results to differ. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements that are made in this report or in any other statement, release, report, or filing from time to time. Actual results could differ because of one or more factors, including those presented below, in other sections of this report, or in material incorporated by reference into this report. Readers of this report should carefully consider the factors discussed in this Item below, among others, in evaluating forward-looking statements and assessing our prospects.

Competition Risks

Like all financial services companies, we compete for customers. Our primary areas of competition include: retail and commercial deposits and bank loans, wealth management, home mortgage loans and lines of credit, mortgage servicing, capital markets products and services, and other consumer and business financial products and services. Our competitors in these areas include national, state, and non-US banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, consumer finance companies, trust companies, investment counseling firms, money market and other mutual funds, insurance companies and agencies, securities firms, mortgage banking companies, and other financial services companies that serve the markets which we serve. We expect that competition will continue to grow more intense with respect to most of our products and services. For additional information regarding competition for customers, refer to the “Competition” heading of Part I, Item 1 beginning on page 11 of this report.

While we face competition for customers, we also compete for financial capital (see “Financing, Funding, and Liquidity Risks” beginning on page 18 of this report) and to acquire and retain the human capital we need to thrive. Labor markets change over time; the segments of that market most useful to us may contract with demographic shifts relating to age, birth rates, education levels, geography, local or regional economic conditions, and other factors. Some of the keys to our ability to manage our competitive challenges are:

Our leading position in many of our markets and business lines

Our historical growth and retention of consumer and business customers

Historically strong employee value and loyalty ratings and national workplace recognition resulting in attraction and retention of high performing employees

Using those factors and others, we have focused on the delivery of products and services in a manner that maximizes the value our customers obtain from their relationships with us, and we have developed

strategies that have enabled us to gain market share in our targeted markets over time. We also have developed strategies to attract customers and talent that are displaced when competitors merge.

Growth Risks

Every organization faces risks associated with growth. Our growth in recent years has resulted primarily from a combination of: our national expansion strategy in banking; acquisition of customers from competitors that have merged with each other; and targeted non-bank business acquisitions.

Our national expansion strategy is primarily organic. Our strategy is to expand our banking business in selected national markets by building on our mortgage customer relationships in those markets. Our strategy is unusual in the financial services industry; many banks elect to become national in scope by acquiring large local and regional banks in targeted geographic areas. We believe our national expansion strategy should reduce some of the costs and risks associated with the acquisition model. The successful execution of our strategy depends upon a number of key elements, including:

our ability to successfully penetrate new markets at a reasonable cost and within a reasonable time frame;

our ability to cross-sell our home mortgage customers into bank products and services;

our ability to attract and retain commercial and other non-mortgage customers;

our ability to develop profitable customer relationships while expanding our existing information processing, technology, and other operational infrastructures effectively and efficiently; and

our ability to manage the liquidity and capital requirements associated with such growth.

We have in place a number of strategies designed to achieve each of those elements. Our challenge is to execute those strategies and adjust them as conditions change.

To the extent we engage in bank or non-bank business acquisitions, we face various risks associated with that practice, including:

our ability to identify, analyze, and correctly assess the contingent risks in the acquisition and to price the transaction appropriately;

our ability to integrate the acquired company into our operations quickly and cost-effectively;

our ability to integrate the name recognition and goodwill of the acquired company with our own; and,

our ability to retain customers and key employees of the acquired company.

To grow effectively, sometimes a company must consider disposing of businesses or units that no longer fit into management’s plans for the future. Key risks associated with dispositions include:

our ability to price the transaction appropriately and otherwise negotiate appropriate terms;

our ability to identify and implement key customer and other transition actions to avoid or minimize negative effects on retained businesses; and

our ability to assess and manage any loss of synergies that the disposed business had with our retained businesses.

Credit Risks

Like all other lenders, we face the risk that our customers may not repay their loans and that the realizable value of collateral may be insufficient to avoid a loss. In our business some level of credit loss

is unavoidable and overall levels of credit loss can vary over time. In 2006, for example, indicators of credit strength for us began the year at unusually strong levels but moderated throughout the year, roughly paralleling a similar trend in the financial services industry. Our ability to manage credit risks depends primarily upon our ability to assess the creditworthiness of customers and the value of collateral, including real estate. We control credit risk by diversifying our loan portfolio and managing its granularity, and by recording and managing an allowance for expected loan losses based on the factors mentioned above and in accordance with applicable accounting rules. We also record loan charge-offs in accordance with accounting and regulatory guidelines and rules. These guidelines and rules could change and cause charge-offs to increase for reasons related or unrelated to the underlying performance of our portfolio; such changes by the OCC and other banking agencies have been common in recent years. This risk is shared with all financial institutions. The models and approaches we use to originate and manage loans are regularly updated to take into account changes in the competitive environment, in real estate prices and other collateral values, and in the economy, among other things, based on our experience originating loans and servicing loan portfolios. Additional information concerning credit risks and our management of them is set forth under the captions “Credit Risk Management” beginning on page 29, “Foreclosure Reserves” beginning on page 43, and “Allowance for Loan Losses” beginning on page 44, of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report.

Risk From Economic Downturns and Changes

Delinquencies and credit losses generally increase during economic downturns due to an increase in liquidity problems for customers and downward pressure on collateral values. Likewise, demand for loans (at a given level of creditworthiness), deposit products, fixed income products, and financial services may decline during an economic downturn, and may be adversely affected by other national, regional, or local economic factors that impact demand for loans and other financial products and services such as (for example) changes in interest rates, real estate prices, or expectations concerning rates or prices. Accordingly, an economic downturn or other adverse economic change (local, regional, or national) can hurt our financial performance in the form of higher loan losses, lower loan production levels, lower deposit levels, and lower fees from transactions and services. These risks are faced by all financial services companies and we have in place processes and tools that we believe allow us to monitor and manage those risks.

Hedge Risks

In the normal course of our businesses, including (among others) banking, mortgage, and capital markets, we attempt to create partial or full economic hedges of various financial risks. We do that primarily by using derivative instruments or by engaging in business activities that are countercyclical to the risks at issue. Our hedging activities are discussed in more detail in various places under the following captions of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report: “Risk Management,” beginning on page 23; and, “Critical Accounting Policies,” beginning on page 38. Hedging creates certain risks for us, including the risk that the other party to the hedge transaction will fail to perform (counterparty risk, which is a type of credit risk), and the risk that the hedge will not fully protect us from loss as intended (hedge failure risk). Although we actively manage those risks, unexpected counterparty failure or hedge failure could have a significant adverse effect on our liquidity and earnings.

Reputation Risks

Our ability to conduct and grow our businesses, and to obtain and retain customers, is highly dependent upon external perceptions of our business practices and our financial stability. Our reputation is, therefore, a key asset for us. Our reputation is affected principally by our own practices and how those practices are perceived and understood by others. Adverse perceptions regarding the practices of our competitors, or our industry as a whole, also may adversely impact our reputation. In addition, adverse perceptions relating to parties with whom we have important relationships may adversely impact our reputation.

Damage to our reputation could hinder our ability to access the capital markets, could hamper our ability to attract new customers and retain existing ones, could create or aggravate regulatory difficulties, and could undermine our ability to attract and retain talented employees, among other things. Adverse impacts on our reputation, or the reputation of our industry, may also result in greater regulatory and/or legislative scrutiny, which may lead to laws or regulations that change or constrain our business or operations. Events that result in damage to our reputation also may increase our litigation risk.

As with all other risks, we actively devote significant resources to safeguard our reputation. Senior management oversees processes for reputation risk monitoring, assessment, and management.

Operational Risks

Our ability to grow is dependent in part upon our ability to create and maintain an appropriate operational and organizational infrastructure, manage expenses as we expand, and recruit and retain personnel with the ability to manage an increasingly complex business. Operational risk can arise in many ways, including: errors related to failed or inadequate processes; faulty or disabled computer systems; fraud, theft, physical security breaches, electronic data and related security breaches, or other criminal conduct by employees or third parties; and exposure to other external events.

In addition, we outsource some of our operational functions to third parties. Those third parties may experience similar errors or disruptions that could adversely impact us and over which we may have limited control and, in some cases, limited ability to quickly obtain an alternate vendor. To the extent we increase our reliance on third party vendors to perform or assist operational functions, the challenge of managing the associated risks becomes more difficult.

Failure to build and maintain the necessary operational infrastructure, or failure of our disaster preparedness plans if primary infrastructure components suffer damage, can lead to risk of loss of service to customers, legal actions, or noncompliance with applicable laws or regulatory standards. Operational risk is specifically managed through internal monitoring, measurement, and assessment by line management and oversight of processes by top management; regulatory guidance for mitigating operational risk is followed. Additional information concerning operational risks and our management of them appears under the caption “Operational Risk Management” beginning on page 29 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report.

Financing, Funding, and Liquidity Risks

Management of liquidity and related risks is a key function for our business. Additional information concerning liquidity risk management is set forth under the caption “Liquidity Management” beginning on page 25 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and

Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report.

Our funding requirements currently are met principally by deposits, financing from other financial institutions, and financing using the capital markets. In general, the costs of our funding directly impact our costs of doing business and, therefore, can positively or negatively affect our financial results.

A number of factors could make such funding more difficult, more expensive, or unavailable on affordable terms, including, but not limited to, our financial results, organizational changes, adverse impacts on our reputation, changes in the activities of our business partners, disruptions in the capital markets, specific events that adversely impact the financial services industry, counterparty availability, changes affecting our loan portfolio or other assets, changes affecting our corporate and regulatory structure, interest rate fluctuations, ratings agency actions, general economic conditions, and the legal, regulatory, accounting, and tax environments governing our funding transactions. In addition, our ability to raise funds is strongly affected by the general state of the U.S. and world economies and financial markets, and may become increasingly difficult due to economic and other factors.

We depend significantly on our ability to sell or securitize first and second mortgage loans and home equity line of credit loans (which we refer to as HELOC). Those actions involve the sale of whole loans or of beneficial interests in loans. Although the market for loans is substantial, if it experiences difficulties we may be unable to sell or securitize our mortgage or HELOC loans at favorable pricing levels, or at all. If we were unable to continue to sell or securitize our loans at current levels, we would seek alternative funding sources to fund loan originations and meet our other liquidity needs. If we were unable to find cost-effective and stable alternatives, that failure could negatively impact our liquidity and could potentially increase our cost of funds and lower our loan growth.

When we sell or securitize mortgage and HELOC loans, we sometimes do so with limited or full recourse, which means, in effect, that we will take some or significant financial responsibility for the loan if it defaults. Additional information concerning these risks is set forth under the caption “Foreclosure Reserves” beginning on page 43 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report. In many instances, we sell or securitize loans with no recourse. However, if a loan sold with no recourse defaults, we could still bear responsibility to the buyer in many cases if the loan defaults shortly after the sale, typically in the first 90 days, or if the loan did not conform to representations we made to the buyer at the time of sale. We manage the early default risk through our credit review processes, and we manage the risk of non-conformity through origination and documentation controls and procedures, and through post-closing quality control processes.

Rating agencies assign credit ratings to issuers and their debt. In that role, agencies directly affect the availability and cost of our funding. The Corporation and the Bank currently receive ratings from several rating entities for unsecured borrowings. A rating below investment grade typically reduces availability and increases the cost of market-based funding. A debt rating of Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service, or BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings, is considered investment grade for many purposes. Currently, all three rating agencies rate the unsecured senior debt of the Corporation and the Bank as investment grade; however, during 2006 all three agencies changed their view of our outlook from ‘stable’ to ‘negative’ even though their ratings did not change. Because we depend on institutional borrowing and the capital markets for funding and capital, we could experience reduced liquidity and increased cost of funding if our debt ratings were lowered, particularly if lowered below investment grade. Please note that a credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold

securities, is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time, and should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Regulatory laws or rules that establish minimum capital levels, regulate deposit insurance, and govern related funding matters for banks could be changed in a manner that could increase our overall cost of capital and thus reduce our earnings.

Interest Rate and Yield Curve Risks

A significant portion of our business involves borrowing and lending money. Accordingly, changes in interest rates directly impact our revenues and expenses, and potentially could compress our net interest margin. We actively manage our balance sheet to control the risks of a reduction in net interest margin brought about by ordinary fluctuations in rates. Additional information concerning those risks and our management of them appears under the caption “Interest Rate Risk Management” beginning on page 23 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report.

Our mortgage lending and servicing businesses also are affected by changes in interest rates. Generally, when rates increase, demand for mortgage loans and HELOC decrease (and our revenues from new originations fall), and when rates decrease, demand increases (and our origination revenues increase). In a contrary fashion, when interest rates increase, the value of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) that we retain generally increases, and when rates decline the value of MSR declines. Within our mortgage businesses, therefore, there is a partial natural hedge against ordinary interest rate changes. Additional information concerning those risks and our management of them appears under the caption “Mortgage Servicing Rights and Other Related Retained Interests” beginning on page 39 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report.

Our mortgage lending business is affected by changes in interest rates in another manner. During the period of loan origination (when loans are in the “pipeline”) and prior to the loan’s sale in the secondary market (when loans are in the “warehouse”), we are exposed to the risk of interest rate changes for those pipeline loans as to which we have agreed to lock in the customer’s mortgage rate and for all warehouse loans that bear a fixed rate. We manage that rate-change risk through hedging activities and other methods. Additional information concerning those risks and our management of them appears under the caption “Pipeline and Warehouse” beginning on page 42 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report.

Like all financial services companies, we face the risks of abnormalities in the yield curve. The yield curve simply shows the interest rates applicable to short and long term debt. The curve is steep when short-term rates are much lower than long-term rates; it is flat when short-term rates are equal, or nearly equal, to long-term rates; and it is inverted when short-term rates exceed long-term rates. Historically, the yield curve normally is relatively steep. However, during much of 2006 the yield curve was inverted and the degree of inversion generally worsened as the year progressed. A flat or inverted yield curve tends to decrease net interest margin, as the warehouse yields narrow relative to their short-term funding sources, and it tends to reduce demand for long-term debt securities, adversely impacting the revenues of our capital markets business.

Lastly, expectations by the market regarding the direction of future interest rate movements, particularly long-term rates, can impact the demand for long-term debt which in turn can impact the revenues of our capital markets business. That risk is most apparent during times when strong expectations have not yet been reflected in market rates, or when expectations are especially weak or uncertain.

Securities Inventories and Market Risks

Our capital markets business buys and sells various types of securities for its customers. In the course of that business we hold inventory positions and are exposed to certain risks of market fluctuations. In addition, we are exposed to credit risk and interest rate risk associated with debt securities. We manage the risks of holding inventories of securities through certain policies and procedures, including hedging activities related to certain interest rate risks. Additional information concerning those risks and our management of them appears under the caption “Market Risk Management” beginning on page 29 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is part of the material from that Report that has been incorporated by reference into Item 7 of Part II of this report, and in the “Credit Risks” discussion beginning on page 16 of this report.

In addition, we earn fees and other income related to our brokerage business and our management of assets for customers. Declines, disruptions, or precipitous changes in market prices can adversely affect those revenue sources.

Venture Capital Risks

Our venture capital business is inherently volatile. The companies we invest in tend to be much less mature, smaller, and much more unproven than a typical public company. Accordingly, those investments carry a substantial risk of loss. Venture capital investments also are inherently illiquid. Success in this business can only be assessed in the long term and depends to a very large extent upon the ability of management to find sound investment prospects, negotiate financially appropriate investment terms, and oversee each investment as the company uses the venture capital and develops. In the short term, venture capital losses are not uncommon even if the business proves to be successful in the long term.

Regulatory and Legal Risks

We operate in a heavily regulated industry and therefore are subject to many banking, deposit, insurance, insurance brokerage, securities brokerage and underwriting, and consumer lending regulations in addition to the rules applicable to all companies publicly traded in the U.S. securities markets and, in particular, on the New York Stock Exchange. Failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in financial, structural, and operational penalties. In addition, efforts to comply with applicable regulations may increase our costs and/or limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities. See “Supervision and Regulation” in Item 1 of this report, beginning on page 3 above, for additional information concerning financial industry regulations. Federal and state regulations significantly limit the types of activities in which we, as a financial institution, may engage. In addition, we are subject to a wide array of other regulations that govern other aspects of how we conduct our business, such as in the areas of employment and intellectual property. Federal and state legislative and regulatory authorities occasionally consider changing these regulations or adopting new ones. Such actions could limit the amount of interest or fees we can charge, could restrict our ability to collect loans or realize on collateral, or could materially affect us in other ways. Additional federal and state consumer protection regulations also could expand the privacy protections afforded to customers of financial institutions, restricting our

ability to share or receive customer information and increasing our costs. In addition, changes in accounting rules can significantly affect how we record and report assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and earnings.

Some state authorities have challenged the position of the OCC that it is the exclusive regulator of various aspects of national banks or their operating subsidiaries. If one or more of those challenges are successful or if Congress were to change the applicable banking laws, we could be impacted significantly, due, among other things, to possible increased regulatory burdens, governmental and private party actions alleging non-compliance with state law, and the expense of tracking and complying with the different laws and regulations of nearly all 50 states.

We also face litigation risks from customers (singly or in class actions) and from federal or state regulators. Litigation is an unavoidable part of doing business, and we manage those risks through internal controls, personnel training, insurance, litigation management, our compliance and ethics processes, and other means. However, the commencement, outcome, and magnitude of litigation cannot be predicted or controlled with certainty.

Accounting Estimate Risks

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. Two of our most critical estimates are the level of the allowance for credit losses and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. However, other estimates occasionally become highly significant, especially in volatile situations such as litigation and other loss contingency matters. Estimates are made at specific points in time; as actual events unfold, estimates are adjusted accordingly. Due to the inherent nature of these estimates, it is possible that, at some time in the future, we may significantly increase the allowance for credit losses and/or sustain credit losses that are significantly higher than the provided allowance, or we may recognize a significant provision for impairment of our mortgage servicing rights, or we may make some other adjustment that will differ materially from the estimates that we make today. For additional information concerning the sensitivity of these estimates, refer to “Critical Accounting Policies” beginning on page 38 of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of our 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Risks of Expense Control

Expenses and other costs directly affect our earnings. Our ability to successfully manage expenses is important to our long-term survival. Many factors can influence the amount of our expenses, as well as how quickly they grow. As our businesses change or expand, additional expenses can arise from asset purchases, structural reorganization, evolving business strategies, and changing regulations, among other things. We manage expense growth and risk through a variety of means, including selectively outsourcing or multi-sourcing various functions and procurement coordination and processes.

Geographic Risks

Our mortgage and capital markets businesses are national in scope. Our national expansion strategy is making our banking business national as well, with full-service branches in several states and many banking products being sold through mortgage offices across the U.S. At present, however, a disproportionate fraction of our traditional banking business remains grounded in, and depends upon, the major Tennessee markets. As a result, to a greater degree than many of our competitors that operate nationally or in much broader regions, our banking business currently is exposed to adverse economic,

regulatory, natural disaster, and other risks that might primarily impact Tennessee and the mid-South region of the U.S.

ITEM 1B
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2
PROPERTIES

The Corporation has no properties that it considers materially important to its financial statements.

ITEM 3
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Corporation is a party to no material pending legal proceedings the nature of which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the Instructions contained in the Form of this Report.

ITEM 4
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted during the fourth quarter of 2006 to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

SUPPLEMENTAL PART I INFORMATION

Executive Officers of Registrant

The following is a list of executive officers of the Corporation as of February 27, 2007. The executive officers are elected at the April meeting of the Corporation’s Board of Directors following the annual meeting of shareholders for a term of one year and until their successors are elected and qualified. Except for Mr. Daniel, who was hired in October 2006, and Mr. Rose, who was elected Chairman of the Board in January 2007, each of the executive officers has been employed by the Corporation or its subsidiaries during each of the last five fiscal years.

Name and Age		Current (Year First Elected to Office) and Recent Offices and Positions
Gerald L. Baker		Chief Executive Officer and President of the Corporation and the
Age: 63		Bank (2007)
		From November 2005 to January 2007, Mr. Baker was Chief Operating Officer
		of the Corporation and the Bank. Prior to November 2005, Mr. Baker was
		Executive Vice President of the Corporation and the Bank and President – First
		Horizon Financial Services; and prior to January 2006, Mr. Baker was
		President – Mortgage Banking and President and Chief Executive Officer of First
		Horizon Home Loan Corporation.

Charles G. Burkett		President – Tennessee and National Banking of the Corporation
Age: 55		and the Bank (2004)
		Prior to November, 2005, Mr. Burkett was President – First Tennessee Financial

		23

		Services and Executive Vice President of the Corporation and the Bank. Prior to
		April 2004 Mr. Burkett was President – Retail Financial Services/Memphis
		Financial Services.

John M. Daniel		Executive Vice President – Employee Services of the Corporation
Age: 52		and the Bank (2006)
		From January 2001 to September 2006, Mr. Daniel was Executive Vice President
		in charge of Human Resources for Regions Financial Corporation.

Herbert H. Hilliard		Executive Vice President, Risk Management (2001) and Govern-
Age: 59		ment Relations, and CRA (1988) of the Corporation and the Bank

Harry A. Johnson, III		Executive Vice President (1990) and General Counsel (1988) of
Age: 58		the Corporation and the Bank

James F. Keen		Executive Vice President (2003), Corporate Controller of the
Age: 56		Corporation (1988) and the Bank (2001) and principal accounting
		officer
		Mr. Keen was appointed Chief Financial Officer on an interim basis, from
		December 1, 2002 until November 17, 2003.

Peter F. Makowiecki		President – Mortgage Banking of the Corporation and the Bank
Age: 47		(2006)
		Mr. Makowiecki also serves as Chief Executive Officer of First Horizon Home
		Loan Corporation (since January 2006), and he served as Chief Financial Officer
		of First Horizon Home Loan Corporation prior to January 2006.

Mark A. Medford		President – FTN Financial of the Corporation and the Bank (2006)
Age: 46		From January 2002 to July 2006 Mr. Medford served as Executive Vice President
		of the Bank and the chief operating officer of the Bank’s FTN Financial division.

Sarah L. Meyerrose		President – Emerging National Businesses of the Corporation and
Age: 51		the Bank (2006)
		From November 2005 to July 2006, Ms. Meyerrose was Executive Vice
		President – Operations and Technology of the Corporation and the Bank. From
		August 2002 to October 2005, Ms. Meyerrose was Executive Vice President,
		Corporate and Employee Services of the Corporation and the Bank. Prior to
		August 2002, Ms. Meyerrose was Executive Vice President, Wealth
		Management. In addition to these functions, Ms. Meyerrose was in charge of
		Employee Services from April 1998 to July 2006.

Marlin L. Mosby, III		Executive Vice President (2002) and Chief Financial Officer (2003)
Age: 43		of the Corporation and the Bank
		Prior to November 2003, Mr. Mosby was Executive Vice President-Strategic
		Planning and Investor Relations and prior to April 2002, he was Senior Vice
		President, Strategic Planning.

John P. O’Connor, Jr.		Executive Vice President of the Corporation (1990) and the Bank
Age: 63		(1987) and Chief Credit Officer (1988)

Michael D. Rose		Chairman of the Board of the Corporation and the Bank (2007)
Age: 64		Mr. Rose is the retired Chairman of Gaylord Entertainment Company, Nashville,
		Tennessee, a diversified hospitality and entertainment company. He served as
		Chairman of Gaylord Entertainment Company from April 2001 to May 2005. Mr.
		Rose has been director of the Corporation and Bank since 1984, and was a non-
		employee director until January 2007 when he was appointed Chairman of the
		Board.

Declaration of Covenant
Relating To
The Bank’s Class A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock

On March 23, 2005, the Bank issued 300,000 shares of Class A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Bank Preferred Stock”). That issuance was the subject of the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 24, 2005. The Bank made a Declaration of Covenant dated as of July 20, 2005 (“Declaration”) in connection with the Bank Preferred Stock. The Declaration was the subject of Item 8.01 of the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 22, 2005. Under the Declaration, the Bank has promised to redeem shares of the Bank Preferred Stock only if and to the extent that the redemption price is equal to or less than the New Equity Amount as of the date of redemption. “New Equity Amount” means, on any date, the net proceeds to the Bank or subsidiaries of the Bank received during the six months prior to such date from new issuances of common stock of the Bank or of other securities or combinations of securities that

	(i)	qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Bank, and

	(ii)	as reasonably determined in good faith by the Bank’s Board of Directors, (x) on a liquidation or dissolution of the Bank rank pari passu with or junior to the Bank Preferred Stock (or, if all of the Bank Preferred Stock has been redeemed, would have ranked pari passu with or junior to the Bank Preferred Stock had it remained outstanding), (y) are perpetual, with no prepayment obligation on the part of the issuer, whether at the election of holders or otherwise (although such securities may be subject to early redemption at the option of the issuer), and (z) dividends or other distributions on which are non-cumulative;

provided , however , that the net proceeds of such securities or combinations of securities (A) if issued to any affiliate of the Bank other than the Corporation, shall not qualify as a New Equity Amount and (B) if issued to the Corporation shall qualify as a New Equity Amount only if such securities or combinations of securities have been purchased by the Corporation with the net proceeds from new issuances of common stock of the Corporation or of securities or combinations of securities by the Corporation during such six-month period that

	(i)	qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Corporation and

	(ii)	as reasonably determined in good faith by the Corporation’s Board of Directors, (x) on a liquidation or dissolution of the issuer rank junior to all indebtedness for money borrowed and claims of other creditors of the issuer, (y) are perpetual, with no prepayment obligation on the part of the issuer, whether at the election of holders or otherwise (although such securities may be subject to early redemption at the option of the issuer), and (z) dividends or other distributions on which are non-cumulative.

The covenants in the Declaration run in favor of persons that buy, hold, or sell debt of the Bank during the period that such debt is “Covered Debt.” The Bank’s 5.05% Subordinated Bank Notes Due January 15, 2015 (“2015 Notes”) are the initial Covered Debt. Other debt will replace the 2015 Notes as the Covered Debt under the Declaration on the earlier to occur of (x) the date two years prior to the 2015 Notes’ maturity, or (y) the date the Bank gives notice of a redemption of the 2015 Notes such that, or the date 2015 Notes are repurchased in such an amount that, the outstanding principal amount of 2015 Notes is or will become less than $100 million.

The Declaration is subject to various additional terms and conditions. The Declaration may be terminated if the holders of at least 51% by principal amount of the Covered Debt so agree, or if the Bank no longer has any long-term indebtedness rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

The summary description of the Declaration in this report is qualified in its entirety by the full terms of the Declaration, which are controlling.

PART II

Note on Page Number References

ITEM 5
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(a) Market for the Corporation’s Common Stock:

The Corporation’s common stock, $0.625 par value, is listed and trades on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. under the symbol FHN. As of December 31, 2006, there were 7,818 shareholders of record of the Corporation’s common stock. Additional information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to:

	(i)	the Summary of Quarterly Financial Information Table (Table 25) (page 47), the Selected Financial and Operating Data Table (page 2), and the “ Liquidity Management” subsection (beginning on page 25) of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section contained in the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders,

	(ii)	Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 89 of the 2006 Annual Report to shareholders, and

	(iii)	the “Payment of Dividends” and “Transactions with Affiliates” subsections beginning on page 4 and 5, respectively, of Item 1 of Part I of this report on Form 10-K.

The Corporation has provided the information required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K on page 122 of its 2006 Annual Report to shareholders under the caption “ Total Shareholder Return Performance Graph.” That information is not “ filed” with this report and is not incorporated by reference herein.

(b) Sale of Unregistered Securities:

On March 1, 2005, FHN purchased all of the outstanding stock of Greenwich Home Mortgage Corporation. A portion of the total purchase price was paid in 2005 to ten shareholders of Greenwich in the form of a total of 90,867 shares of FHN's common stock, par value $0.625 per share, inclusive of shares issued into escrow accounts established under the acquisition agreement. The agreement calls for possible additional shares to be issued over certain periods based on certain actions or results (collectively, “adjustment shares”). During 2006, a total of 12,398 adjustment shares were distributed to Greenwich shareholders pursuant to the agreement. There was no underwriter associated with the privately negotiated transaction. The issuance of FHN shares in connection with the transaction was exempt from registration pursuant, among other things, to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Except for such shares, during 2006 the Corporation sold no equity securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Repurchases are made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions and are subject to market conditions, accumulation of excess equity and prudent capital management. Pursuant to Board authority, the Corporation may repurchase shares from time to time for its stock option and other compensation plans and will evaluate the level of capital and take action designed to generate or use

capital as appropriate for the interests of the shareholders. Additional information concerning repurchase activity during the final three months of 2006 is presented in Table 13, and the surrounding notes and other text, of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section appearing on page 22 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders, which information is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 6
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Selected Financial and Operating Data table appearing on page 2 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders.

ITEM 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section, Glossary section, and the Consolidated Historical Statements of Income and Consolidated Average Balance Sheets and Related Yields and Rates tables appearing on pages 3-52 and 118-120 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders.

ITEM 7A
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the “Interest Rate Risk Management” subsection of Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and to the “Risk Management-Interest Rate Risk Management” subsection of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section, both of which appear, respectively, on pages 113-114 and on pages 23-25 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders.

ITEM 8
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto and to the Summary of Quarterly Financial Information table appearing, respectively, on pages 57-117 and on page 47 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders.

ITEM 9
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures . The Corporation’s management, with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the

effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by the annual report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation and the Corporation’s consolidated subsidiaries is made known to such officers by others within these entities, particularly during the period this annual report was prepared, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting . The report of management required by Item 308(a) of Regulation S-K, and the attestation report required by Item 308(b) of Regulation S-K, appear at pages 53-54 of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting . There have not been any changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during the Corporation’s fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9A(T)
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 9B
OTHER INFORMATION

There is no information required to have been disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2006 that has not been reported.

PART III

ITEM 10
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information called for by this Item as it relates to directors and nominees for director of the Corporation, the Audit Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors, members of the Audit Committee, and audit committee financial expert is incorporated herein by reference to the “ Corporate Governance and Board Matters” section and the “ Vote Item No. 1—Election of Directors” section of the Corporation’s 2007 Proxy Statement (excluding the Audit Committee Report, the statements regarding the existence, availability, and location of the Audit Committee’s charter, and the Compensation Committee Report). The information required by this Item as it relates to executive officers of the Corporation is incorporated herein by reference to the information provided under the heading “Executive Officers of Registrant” in the Supplemental Part I Information following Item 4 of this Report. The information required by this Item as it relates to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated herein by reference to the “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” section of the 2007 Proxy Statement.

In 2006 there were no material amendments to the procedures, described in the Corporation’s 2006 Proxy Statement, by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

The Corporation’s Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that applies to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller and also applies to all professionals serving in the financial, accounting, or audit areas of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. A copy of the Code has been filed (or incorporated by reference) as Exhibit 14 to this report and is posted on the Corporation’s current internet website (www.fhnc.com). (Click on “Investor Relations,” and then “Corporate Governance.”) A paper copy of the Code is available without charge upon written request addressed to the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation at its main office, 165 Madison Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38103. The Corporation intends to satisfy its disclosure obligations under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K related to Code amendments or waivers by posting such information on the Corporation’s internet website, the address for which is listed above.

ITEM 11
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Executive Compensation,” and “Director Compensation” sections of the Corporation’s 2007 Proxy Statement.

The Corporation has provided the information required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K in its 2007 Proxy Statement under the caption “Compensation Committee Report.” That information is not “filed” with this report and is not incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information required by this Item pursuant to Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the “ Equity Compensation Plan Information” section of the Corporation’s 2007 Proxy Statement, immediately following Vote Item No. 2 .

Beneficial Ownership of Corporation Stock

The information required by this Item pursuant to Item 403(a) and (b) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the “ Stock Ownership Information” section of the Corporation’s 2007 Proxy Statement.

Change in Control Arrangements

The Corporation is unaware of any arrangements which may result in a change in control of the Corporation.

ITEM 13
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

A portion of the information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the “ Transactions with Related Persons” section of the 2007 Proxy Statement. The Corporation’s independent directors and nominees are identified in the first paragraph of the “I ndependence and

Categorical Standards” section of the 2007 Proxy Statement, which paragraph is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy, a copy of which is set forth as part of Appendix D to the Corporation’s 2007 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information regarding fees billed to the Corporation by KPMG LLP for the two most recent fiscal years is incorporated herein by reference to the “ Vote Item No. 3” section of the 2007 Proxy Statement. No services were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.

PART IV

ITEM 15
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as a part of this Report:

Financial Statements:

Page 57*	1.	Consolidated Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Page 58*	2.	Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Page 59*	3.	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.

Page 60*	4.	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Pages 61-117*	5.	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Pages 54-56*	6.	Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

*The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation, the notes thereto, and the reports of independent public accountants, as listed above, are incorporated herein by reference to the indicated pages of the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders.

Financial Statement Schedules: Not applicable.

Exhibits:

Exhibits marked with an “*” represent a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be identified and filed as an exhibit.

Exhibits marked with a “+” are filed herewith.

3.1	Amended and Restated Charter of the Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 3-31-04.

3.2	Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended and restated as of January 29, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 2007.

4.1	Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of October 20, 1998, between the Corporation and First Tennessee Bank National Association, as Rights Agent, including as Exhibit A the forms of Rights Certificate and Election to Exercise and as Exhibit B the form of Articles of Amendment designating Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed 10-23-98.

4.2	The Corporation and certain of its consolidated subsidiaries have outstanding certain long-term debt. See Note 10 in the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders. At December 31, 2006, none of such debt exceeded 10% of the total assets of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Thus, copies of constituent instruments defining the rights of holders of such debt are not required to be included as exhibits. The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

4.3	Three principal agreements related to a note program for First Tennessee Bank National Association (the “Bank”): (i) form of Distribution Agreement dated February 18, 2005 among the registrant, the Bank, and the agents therein named; (ii) form of Fiscal and Paying Agency Agreement dated as of February 18, 2005 between the Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association; and (iii) form of Interest Calculation Agreement dated as of February 18, 2005 between the Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. All such agreements are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 25, 2005

*Deferral Plans and Related Exhibits

*10.1(a1)	Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 6-30-03 and form of individual agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Corporation’s 1996 Annual report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(a2)	Rate Applicable to Directors and Executive Officers Under the Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a1) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 16, 2007.

*10.1(b)	Director Deferral Agreements with schedule, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the Corporation’s 1992 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Exhibit 10(j) to the Corporation’s 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(c)	First Tennessee National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(d)	Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to the Corporation’s 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(e)	2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated 4-20-04, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(n) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 6-30-04.

*10.1(f)	[1991] Bank Advisory Director Deferral Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to the Corporation’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(g)	[1997] Bank Director and Advisory Board Member Deferral Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to the Corporation’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(h)	2002 Bank Director and Advisory Board Member Deferral Plan, as amended and restated 4-20-04, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 6-30-04.

*10.1(i)	First Horizon Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-106015), filed June 11, 2003.

*10.1(j)	FTN Financial Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-110845), filed December 1, 2003.

*10.1(k)	Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement used under the registrant’s 2003 Equity Compensation Plan and First Tennessee National Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, along with form of Salary, Commission, and Annual Bonus Deferral Programs Overview, form of Deferred Stock Option (“DSO”) Program Summary, and description of share receipt deferral feature, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 3, 2005.

*10.1(l)	Description of April 19, 2005 amendments to the First Horizon National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly First Tennessee National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(l) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2005.

*10.1(m)	Description of changes to options granted in January 2005 to certain employees in connection with deferrals of salary earned in 2004, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(m) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 19, 2005.

*Stock-Based Incentive Plans

*10.2(a)	1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and 1-21-97, 10-22-97, and 10-18-00 amendments, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the Corporation’s 1992, 1996, 1997 and 2000 Annual Reports on Form 10-K.

*10.2(b)	1992 Restricted Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 3-31-99.

*10.2(c)	1995 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2(c) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 2005.

*10.2(d)	1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 9-30-02.

*10.2(e)	2000 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2(e) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 2005.

*10.2(f)	2003 Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the Corporation’s Proxy Statement furnished to shareholders in connection with the annual meeting held on April 18, 2006, filed March 13, 2006.

*TARSAP/PARSAP Restricted Stock Agreements and Related Documents

*10.3(a)	Form of accelerated (performance based) Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1992 Restricted Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.3(b)	Form of accelerated (performance based) Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.3(c)	Description of performance criteria related to TARSAP/PARSAP awards granted prior to 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(c) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.3(d)	Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.3(e)	Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for executive officers other than the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(e) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.3(f)	Description of performance criteria related to 2005 PARSAP Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(f) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*LTIP Documents

*10.4(a)	Form of Notice of 2003 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, with form of related Restricted Stock Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(a) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, and Baker are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses were based on a measure of business unit

	earnings, as described in the bracketed text in Section 5.0 of the Notice. Messrs. Hughes and Baker received no Restricted Stock Agreement in connection with their 2003 LTIP awards.

*10.4(b)	Form of Notice of 2004 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(b) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, and Baker are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses were based on a measure of business unit earnings, as described in the bracketed text in Section 5.0 of the Notice.

*10.4(c)	Form of Notice of 2005 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(c) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10- K. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, Makowiecki, and Martin are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit.

*10.4(d)	Form of Notice of 2006 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, Makowiecki , and Martin are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit.

*10.4(e)	Form of Notice of 2006 LTIP award, used for mid-year awards, under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(e) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006.

*Other Stock-Based Incentive Plan Agreements and Related Documents

*10.5(a)	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Director used under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 18, 2005.

*10.5(b)	April 2003 Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan with J. Kenneth Glass, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(b) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(c)	Form of Agreement To Defer Receipt Of Shares Following Option Exercise, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(c) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(d)	Form of Agreement to Exchange Shares for RSUs and Defer Receipt of Shares [relating to Restricted Stock], incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(d) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(e)	Form of Stock Option Grant Notice, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(e) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(f)	Form of Stock Option Reload Grant Notification, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(f) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(g)	Form of Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2005), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(g) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.5(h)	Form of Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used during 2005), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(h) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.5(i)	Form of 2006 Promotional Performance Share Unit grant notice to Mr. Baker, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(i) of the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 14, 2006.

*10.5(j)	Form of Management Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(j) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(k)	Form of Management Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(k) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(l)	Form of Performance Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(l) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(m)	Form of Performance Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(m) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(n)	Sections of Director Policy pertaining to compensation and retirement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(n) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2006.

*10.5(o)+	First Tennessee Stock Option Enhancement Program.

*Management Cash Incentive Plan Documents

*10.6(a)	2002 Management Incentive Plan, as amended April 19, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6(a) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.6(b)	Description of certain special retention bonuses to 2006 Named Executive Officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6(b) of the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2007 .

Other Material Contract Exhibits related to Management or Directors

*10.7(a1)	2005 form of change-in-control severance agreement between the registrant and its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2005. At February 27, 2007, all of the 2006 named executive officers are parties to this agreement except Mr. Baker. Messrs. Burkett, Makowiecki, Hughes, and Martin are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit. Currently, the “salary amount” referred to in Section 5(iv)(C) for all executive officers is to be “three.”

*10.7(a2)	2007 form of change-in-control severance agreement applicable to executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7(a2) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2007. At February 27, 2007, the 2006 named executive officer who is a party to this agreement is Mr. Baker. Messrs. Burkett and Makowiecki are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit.

*10.7(b)	Survivor Benefits Plan, as amended and restated July 18, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

*10.7(c)+	Description of other compensation and benefit arrangements for the Corporation’s non-employee directors.

*10.7(d)	Long-Term Disability Program, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to the Corporation’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.7(e1)	Amended and Restated Pension Restoration Plan, as amended and restated 4-20-04, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

*10.7(f)	Jim L. Hughes employment agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

*10.7(g)	Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Corporation and its directors and executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

10.7(h)	[Reserved]

*10.7(i)+	Description of Certain Benefits Available to Executive Officers.

*10.7(j)	Conformed copy of Larry B. Martin Retirement Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2006.

*10.7(k)	Form of Limited Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement with Mr. Jim L. Hughes, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006.

Other Material Contract Exhibits

10.8	Form of master confirmation related to an accelerated stock repurchase of 4 million of the registrant’s common shares on March 1, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 1, 2006.

10.9	Form of Merchant Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 31, 2006, among several subsidiaries of the registrant and NOVA Information Systems, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The omitted information has been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10.10	Form of Settlement Agreement related to McLean litigation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15, 2007.

13+	Pages 2 through 120 of the First Horizon National Corporation 2006 Annual Report to shareholders, a copy of which is furnished for the information of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be “filed” with the Commission.

14	Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Corporation’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

21+	Subsidiaries of the Corporation.

23+	Accountant’s Consents.

24+	Powers of Attorney.

31(a)+	Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

31(b)+	Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

32(a)+	18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

32(b)+	18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION

Date: February 28, 2007	By:	/s/ Marlin L. Mosby, III
		Marlin L. Mosby, III, Executive Vice President
		and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

Gerald L. Baker*	Chief Executive Officer, President,	February 28, 2007
Gerald L. Baker	and a Director
	(principal executive officer)

Marlin L. Mosby, III*	Executive Vice President and Chief	February 28, 2007
Marlin L. Mosby, III	Financial Officer (principal
	financial officer)

James F. Keen*	Executive Vice President and	February 28, 2007
James F. Keen	Corporate Controller (principal
	accounting officer)

Michael D. Rose*	Chairman of the Board and a Director	February 28, 2007
Michael D. Rose

Robert C. Blattberg*	Director	February 28, 2007
Robert C. Blattberg

Simon F. Cooper*	Director	February 28, 2007
Simon F. Cooper

J. Kenneth Glass*	Director	February 28, 2007
J. Kenneth Glass

James A. Haslam, III*	Director	February 28, 2007
James A. Haslam, III

R. Brad Martin*	Director	February 28, 2007
R. Brad Martin

Vicki R. Palmer *	Director	February 28, 2007
Vicki R. Palmer

Colin V. Reed*	Director	February 28, 2007
Colin V. Reed

Mary F. Sammons*	Director	February 28, 2007
Mary F. Sammons

William B. Sansom*	Director	February 28, 2007
William B. Sansom

Luke Yancy III*	Director	February 28, 2007
Luke Yancy III


*By: /s/ Clyde A. Billings, Jr.		February 28, 2007
Clyde A. Billings, Jr.
As Attorney-in-Fact

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibits marked with an “*” represent a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be identified and filed as an exhibit.

Exhibits marked with a “+” are filed herewith.

3.1	Amended and Restated Charter of the Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 3-31-04.

3.2	Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended and restated as of January 29, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 2007.

4.1	Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of October 20, 1998, between the Corporation and First Tennessee Bank National Association, as Rights Agent, including as Exhibit A the forms of Rights Certificate and Election to Exercise and as Exhibit B the form of Articles of Amendment designating Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed 10-23-98.

4.2	The Corporation and certain of its consolidated subsidiaries have outstanding certain long- term debt. See Note 10 in the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to shareholders. At December 31, 2006, none of such debt exceeded 10% of the total assets of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Thus, copies of constituent instruments defining the rights of holders of such debt are not required to be included as exhibits. The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

4.3	Three principal agreements related to a note program for First Tennessee Bank National Association (the “Bank”): (i) form of Distribution Agreement dated February 18, 2005 among the registrant, the Bank, and the agents therein named; (ii) form of Fiscal and Paying Agency Agreement dated as of February 18, 2005 between the Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association; and (iii) form of Interest Calculation Agreement dated as of February 18, 2005 between the Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. All such agreements are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 25, 2005.

*Deferral Plans and Related Exhibits

*10.1(a1)	Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 6-30-03 and form of individual agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Corporation’s 1996 Annual report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(a2)	Rate Applicable to Directors and Executive Officers Under the Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a1) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 16, 2007.

*10.1(b)	Director Deferral Agreements with schedule, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the Corporation’s 1992 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Exhibit 10(j) to the Corporation’s 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(c)	First Tennessee National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(d)	Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to the Corporation’s 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(e)	2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated 4-20-04, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(n) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 6-30-04.

*10.1(f)	[1991] Bank Advisory Director Deferral Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to the Corporation’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(g)	[1997] Bank Director and Advisory Board Member Deferral Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to the Corporation’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.1(h)	2002 Bank Director and Advisory Board Member Deferral Plan, as amended and restated 4-20-04, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 6-30-04.

*10.1(i)	First Horizon Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-106015), filed June 11, 2003.

*10.1(j)	FTN Financial Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-110845), filed December 1, 2003.

*10.1(k)	Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement used under the registrant’s 2003 Equity Compensation Plan and First Tennessee National Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, along with form of Salary, Commission, and Annual Bonus Deferral Programs Overview, form of Deferred Stock Option (“DSO”) Program Summary, and description of share receipt deferral feature, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 3, 2005.

*10.1(l)	Description of April 19, 2005 amendments to the First Horizon National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly First Tennessee National Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(l) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2005.

*10.1(m)	Description of changes to options granted in January 2005 to certain employees in connection with deferrals of salary earned in 2004, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(m) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 19, 2005.

*Stock-Based Incentive Plans

*10.2(a)	1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and 1-21-97, 10-22-97, and 10-18-00 amendments, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the Corporation’s 1992, 1996, 1997 and 2000 Annual Reports on Form 10-K.

*10.2(b)	1992 Restricted Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 3-31-99.

*10.2(c)	1995 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2(c) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 2005.

*10.2(d)	1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 9-30-02.

*10.2(e)	2000 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2(e) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 2005.

*10.2(f)	2003 Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the Corporation’s Proxy Statement furnished to shareholders in connection with the annual meeting held on April 18, 2006, filed March 13, 2006.

*TARSAP/PARSAP Restricted Stock Agreements and Related Documents

*10.3(a)	Form of accelerated (performance based) Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1992 Restricted Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.3(b)	Form of accelerated (performance based) Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.3(c)	Description of performance criteria related to TARSAP/PARSAP awards granted prior to 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(c) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.3(d)	Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.3(e)	Form of 2005 PARSAP Agreement (for executive officers other than the CEO), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(e) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.3(f)	Description of performance criteria related to 2005 PARSAP Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(f) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*LTIP Documents

*10.4(a)	Form of Notice of 2003 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, with form of related Restricted Stock Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(a) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, and Baker are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses were based on a measure of business unit earnings, as described in the bracketed text in Section 5.0 of the Notice. Messrs. Hughes and Baker received no Restricted Stock Agreement in connection with their 2003 LTIP awards.

*10.4(b)	Form of Notice of 2004 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(b) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, and Baker are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses were based on a measure of business unit earnings, as described in the bracketed text in Section 5.0 of the Notice.

*10.4(c)	Form of Notice of 2005 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(c) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10- K. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, Makowiecki, and Martin are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit.

*10.4(d)	Form of Notice of 2006 LTIP award under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Messrs. Burkett, Hughes, Makowiecki, and Martin are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit.

*10.4(e)	Form of Notice of 2006 LTIP award, used for mid-year awards, under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4(e) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006.

*Other Stock-Based Incentive Plan Agreements and Related Documents

*10.5(a)	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Director used under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 18, 2005.

*10.5(b)	April 2003 Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan with J. Kenneth Glass, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(b) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(c)	Form of Agreement To Defer Receipt Of Shares Following Option Exercise, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(c) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(d)	Form of Agreement to Exchange Shares for RSUs and Defer Receipt of Shares [relating to Restricted Stock], incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(d) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(e)	Form of Stock Option Grant Notice, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(e) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(f)	Form of Stock Option Reload Grant Notification, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(f) to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.5(g)	Form of Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2005), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(g) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.5(h)	Form of Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used during 2005), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(h) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.5(i)	Form of 2006 Promotional Performance Share Unit grant notice to Mr. Baker, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(i) of the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 14, 2006.

*10.5(j)	Form of Management Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(j) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(k)	Form of Management Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(k) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(l)	Form of Performance Stock Option Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(l) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(m)	Form of Performance Restricted Stock Grant Notice (used for executive officers during 2006), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(m) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

*10.5(n)	Sections of Director Policy pertaining to compensation and retirement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5(n) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2006.

*10.5(o)+	First Tennessee Stock Option Enhancement Program.

*Management Cash Incentive Plan Documents

*10.6(a)	2002 Management Incentive Plan, as amended April 19, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6(a) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

*10.6(b)	Description of certain special retention bonuses to 2006 Named Executive Officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6(b) of the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2007.


Other Material Contract Exhibits related to Management or Directors

*10.7(a1)	2005 form of change-in-control severance agreement between the registrant and its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2005. At February 27, 2007, all of the 2006 named executive officers are parties to this agreement except Mr. Baker. Messrs. Burkett, Makowiecki, Hughes, and Martin are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit. Currently, the “salary amount” referred to in Section 5(iv)(C) for all executive officers is to be “three.”

*10.7(a2)	2007 form of change-in-control severance agreement applicable to executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7(a2) to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2007. At February 27, 2007, the 2006 named executive officer who is a party to this agreement is Mr. Baker. Messrs. Burkett and Makowiecki are the 2006 named executive officers whose bonuses are based on a measure of business unit earnings, as noted in the exhibit.

*10.7(b)	Survivor Benefits Plan, as amended and restated July 18, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

*10.7(c)+	Description of other compensation and benefit arrangements for the Corporation’s non-employee directors.

*10.7(d)	Long-Term Disability Program, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to the Corporation’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*10.7(e1)	Amended and Restated Pension Restoration Plan, as amended and restated 4-20-04, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

*10.7(f)	Jim L. Hughes employment agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004

*10.7(g)	Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Corporation and its directors and executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

10.7(h)	[Reserved]

*10.7(i)+	Description of Certain Benefits Available to Executive Officers.

*10.7(j)	Conformed copy of Larry B. Martin Retirement Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2006.

*10.7(k)	Form of Limited Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement with Mr. Jim L. Hughes, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006.

Other Material Contract Exhibits

10.8	Form of master confirmation related to an accelerated stock repurchase of 4 million of the registrant’s common shares on March 1, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 1, 2006.

10.9	Form of Merchant Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 31, 2006, among several subsidiaries of the registrant and NOVA Information Systems, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The omitted information has been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10.10	Form of Settlement Agreement related to McLean litigation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 10 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15, 2007.

13+	Pages 2 through 120 of the First Horizon National Corporation 2006 Annual Report to shareholders, a copy of which is furnished for the information of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be “filed” with the Commission.

14	Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Corporation’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

21+	Subsidiaries of the Corporation.

23+	Accountant’s Consents.

24+	Powers of Attorney.

31(a)+	Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

31(b)+	Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

32(a)+	18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

32(b)+	18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

EXHIBIT 10.5(o)

FIRST TENNESSEE

STOCK OPTION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Introduction

The Company has adopted the Stock Option Enhancement Program, which is designed to allow you more flexibility in the management of your stock options. The Stock Option Enhancement Program is available to all employees in salary grades 1 through 21.

Prior to the adoption of this Program, you had the choice of either exercising for cash or stock at some point during the term of the option. The feature of this Program is the additional choice of exercising a stock option and deferring the profit shares and dividends. You may select any future date for distribution of the shares and dividends up to retirement plus five years. To exercise a stock option and defer the gains, you must have a deferral agreement in place for a minimum of six months prior to the exercise and the exercise price must be paid in stock (or stock swap), not cash.

Options exercised by employing a “stock swap” in the past have required the delivery of the stock certificates to the Compensation Department. “Stock swaps” for this Program require you to complete the “ attestation form ” attached in which you “attest” to the ownership of the required number of shares to pay the exercise price. This eliminates the need for you to deliver the shares and then have that number of shares reissued when you exercise under the Stock Option Enhancement Plan.

In order to exercise and defer the gain on a stock option, the shares delivered for the exercise (by attestation) must be mature . Mature shares are shares that have been obtained through an employee benefit plan such as stock options or restricted stock and have been owned outright by you and free of restrictions on transfer for a minimum of six months . Any shares purchased in the open market are by definition, mature even if they have not been owned for six months.

You should weigh carefully your decision to participate in this Program based on your specific financial and tax situation and as well as your financial goals. The election to defer is irrevocable . FICA tax will be due at the time of the deferral. However, ordinary income tax will not be due until the distribution of the stock. You will be liable for ordinary income tax on the date of the distribution of the shares and dividends based on the value of the stock and accrued dividends and interest. However, in the case of termination (either voluntarily or involuntarily), death, disability or change-in-control, the deferral account will be distributed.

A prospectus on this Program is attached as the last exhibit to this package.

The following questions and answers address the major issues of the Program. If you have specific questions not addressed in this document please call Kay Williams (901-523-5843) or Theresa Mitchell (901-523-5325).

DEFERRAL OF STOCK OPTION GAINS

What must I do in order to participate in this Plan? (Deferral Agreement: Exhibit I)

1.	You must execute a deferral agreement (attached) and return the agreement to the Compensation Department (Attn.: Theresa Mitchell; CT-6; IMZ 8462; Memphis).

2.	This agreement must be held on file in the Compensation Department a minimum of six months prior to your election to defer the gains from a stock option.

3.	A deferral agreement is attached to this document (Exhibit I). Should you misplace your deferral agreement, please call the Compensation Department, Memphis and another agreement will be provided (901-523-5843/5325).

Only shares from non-qualified stock options may be deferred. As all current outstanding grants consist of non-qualified options, any profit shares from your stock option grants may be deferred. Should the Company elect to grant incentive stock options in the future, the profit shares from these grants may not be deferred. However, there are no plans at present to grant incentive stock options.

May more than one deferral agreement be on file at any time?

1.	Yes, but only one deferral agreement per option grant will be accepted at any one time.

2.	You may have been granted more than one option. You may file a deferral agreement on each option at any time.

Must I exercise when the six month holding period for the deferral agreement is complete?

1.	NO. You may exercise at any time after the six month holding period is complete. However, you must exercise prior to the end of the term of the option.

May I decide to exercise a lesser number of shares than are specified in the deferral agreement?

1.	You must exercise the option as agreed to in the deferral agreement.

What if I submit a deferral agreement and decide later I do not wish to defer?

1.	Your deferral agreement is irrevocable and you must exercise the option shares specified in the deferral agreement. Failure to do so will result in the forfeiture of the option shares specified in the agreement as well as the gain associated with those shares .

•

For the deferral program to comply with the income tax laws and regulations, a penalty must be imposed for failure to execute a deferral agreement. Otherwise, the employee is in “constructive receipt” of the shares. “Constructive Receipt” could result in the disqualification of all deferrals and immediate distribution of all deferred shares plus accrued dividends under this Program. Therefore, an untimely tax event could occur for all participating employees.

What are “mature” shares and why must exercises be made with mature shares?

1.	Mature shares are shares you have obtained from the Company through a stock option or restricted stock program and have owned, without any restrictions on transfer, for a period of at least six months prior to the exercise.

2.	Any shares purchased in the open market are also “mature”.

3.	Why must I use mature shares to exercise? The accounting rules state that for the Company to receive favorable accounting treatment for this program, shares must have been held by the employee for a minimum period. That minimum period has been defined as six months.

What is “attestation” and why is the Company requiring the use of attestation in exercises for a deferral? (Attestation Form: Exhibit II)

1.	When a stock option was exercised by a stock swap method in the past, the optionee was required to deliver the stock certificate to the Company and another stock certificate representing the stock option was reissued.

2.	By employing the attestation form, you “attest” or certify to the ownership of a sufficient number of shares of Company stock to pay the exercise price. This method eliminates the need to deliver stock certificates.

3.	This is a more secure and convenient method of excising a stock option employing a swap for you and saves the Company the time and money required to cancel your old stock certificate and issuing an new one.

How many shares must I deliver by attestation when the exercise price of the option requires the delivery of a fractional share?

1.	Assume the option exercise price is $2,950 and the fair market value (FMV) of the stock is $60. In this event, the share requirement is 49.67 shares ($2,950/$60).

2.	Could you deliver 49 shares (value $2,940) and a check for $10 to cover the $2,950 exercise price? NO .

3.	The entire exercise price of the option must be paid in stock to ensure compliance with tax and accounting rules.

In this example, you must deliver by attestation at least 50 shares worth $3,000 (50 x $60) and the Company will refund you the difference of $50 ($3,000 - $2,950) for the fractional share. If you had a certificate for 200 shares, you could attest to the ownership of it and the Company would only use 50 of the shares in payment of the exercise price.

How far in the future may I elect to defer the gains from a stock option?

1.	You may elect to defer the gains from a stock option up to actual retirement whether normal or early plus five years.

2.	The Deferral Agreement (Exhibit I) provides three choices:

•

By specifying a future date, or

•

“on retirement”, or

•

“on retirement plus _____ years and ____ months.

3.	In no case may the deferral period exceed actual retirement plus five years.

What happens to my stock option gains when I defer?

1.	Your stock option gains will be held in an account denominated in “phantom shares” to be delivered to you as shares of stock on the date specified in your deferral agreement.

•

These shares may not be voted nor are they considered beneficially owned for securities law reporting purposes.

Will dividends be paid on my “phantom shares”?

1.	Yes: Dividends will be accrued in your account in the amount and on the date the Company pays dividends on its common stock.

2.	The dividends will also earn interest at a 10 year US Treasury rate compounded annually.

3.	The dividends and interest will be paid to you by check on the date of distribution specified in your deferral agreement.

4.	There is no provision for “dividend reinvestment” in this plan.

What happens at the end of the deferral period?

1.	The “phantom shares” in your deferral account will be delivered to you in the form of a Company stock certificate denominated in the number of shares specified in your account.

2.	You will also receive a check for the accrued dividends plus interest.

3.	The distribution of the deferral account will be in lump sum on the date specified in the deferral agreement. There are no provisions to distribute the shares and accrued dividends in increments.

What is the tax treatment when I defer?

1.	On the date of exercise, you will be liable for FICA tax on the stock option gain. Under the current tax code, there are no additional FICA tax withholding requirements at distribution.

•

(2004 FICA Levels: 7.65% on wages up to $87,900 + 1.45% on all wages above $87,900)

2.	At the end of the deferral period you will be subject to ordinary income tax on:

•

The value of the shares delivered to you based on the fair market value of the stock on the date the deferral period ends, plus;

•

The check representing the accrued dividends and interest.

3.	Currently, the minimum withholding for the value of the deferral account is 25%.

Should the stock split during the deferral period, how will my account be affected?

1.	Your account will be adjusted to reflect the stock split. For example, assume you have 1,000 shares in a deferral account and the Company approves a 2:1 stock split. Your account will be adjusted from 1,000 to 2,000 phantom shares.

2.	You will also accrue dividends based on the share adjustment (2,000 shares in this example).

Under what circumstances may the deferral account be closed prior to the end of the deferral period?

1.	In the events of termination (either voluntary or involuntary) that is not a retirement, death, disability or change-in-control, the shares in the account plus accrued dividends (cash) will be distributed to you.

•

In other words, should you leave the Company for any reason other than retirement, account distribution will occur.

2.	In the event of account distribution, you will be liable for ordinary income tax on the value of the account calculated as of the distribution date and a minimum of 25% of this value must be withheld.

What if I leave the Company with an unexecuted deferral agreement on file?

1.	You must be an active employee of the Company or its subsidiaries both at the time of the execution of the agreement and at the time of the exercise of the option.

2.	If you leave the Company for any reason prior to the exercise of the option, the agreement is canceled.

Can someone “draw a picture” of deferring stock option gains for me?

1.	YES; Refer to Exhibit III!

RELOAD STOCK OPTIONS

What is a “reload stock option”?

1.	A reload stock option is a new option that is granted when an employee exercises an existing option by paying the exercise price with shares (by attestation) and not cash.

What are the conditions of the reload stock option grant?

1.	The reload grant will consist of the number of shares swapped to exercise a stock option. For example, if the exercise price of an option is $3,000 and the FMV of the stock is $60, you must deliver by attestation, 50 shares ($3,000 / $60). In this example, you will receive 50 shares in the reload option grant.

2.	The reload option’s term will end on the time and date of the original option grant. If you exercise an option by attestation whose term will end on April 15, 2000, the term of the reload grant will also end on April 15, 2000.

3.	The reload shares are vested immediately on grant and may be exercised at any time prior to the end of the option’s term.

4.	The exercise price per share is the fair market value of one share on the date the original option is exercised.

What other conditions apply to a reload option grant?

1.	Those conditions specified in the stock option plan under which the stock option is granted regarding termination, death, disability, retirement and change-in-control also apply to the reload grant.

What must I do to exercise and receive a reload grant?

1.	When you exercise a stock option by attestation that has at least one year left in the option’s term, you will automatically receive a reload stock option grant.

Are “mature” shares required to exercise and receive a reload grant?

1.	YES. Mature shares are required to exercise for a reload grant in the same circumstance you must have mature shares to exercise and defer stock option gains.

How many reload option grants may be made for each stock option grant?

1.	ONE. As the Company is granting options on an annual basis, you will have a number of outstanding option grants. However, you may receive only one reload grant per option grant.

When may I elect to exercise a stock option (by attestation) and receive a reload option grant?

1.	You may elect to exercise your option(s) at any time after the shares are vested and receive a reload option grant as long as you employ the attestation method of exercise.

2.	Reload options will not be granted during the last year of the original option’s term.

•

If a reload option were granted during the last year of the original option’s term, the term of the reload option will be less than one year.

Holding Requirements:

•	A condition of receiving a reload stock option grant is that 50% of the “profit shares” realized when the reload option is exercised will be held by the Company for five years as restricted stock. You may keep or sell the other 50% of the profit shares.

•

The term “profit shares” means the number of shares equal to the spread (or profit) on the option at the time of exercise divided by the FMV of one share on the date of exercise.

•

e.g., If the profit from the exercise of a reload option is 100 shares, 50 shares will be issued with a legend restricting transfer for 5 years. This restriction does not permit you to transfer ownership of (or sell!) the stock until the restrictions are removed five years hence.

•

You will continue to receive the dividends and be able to vote the stock during the period of restriction.

What are the holding requirements if I need to sell stock to pay the taxes on a reload exercise?

1.	The stock holding requirements are “net of shares sold to pay taxes”.

•

Using the example above, if you exercise and have 100 profit shares pre-tax and must sell 20 shares to pay taxes, 40 shares will be issued as restricted stock [(100-20)/2 = 40]

Are there any circumstances under which the restrictions may be removed prior to the end of the five year holding period?

1.	The restrictions will be removed early in the events of termination (either voluntarily or involuntarily), death, disability or change-in-control.

What are the tax consequences of exercising a reload option?

1.	If the gains are not deferred, you will be liable for FICA and ordinary income tax on the gains and exercise. (Minimum current withholding for ordinary income tax is 27.5%.)

When the restrictions are removed from the shares withheld to meet the holding requirements, what are the tax consequences?

1.	None: You have met the tax requirements for ownership by payment of the ordinary income tax and FICA at exercise.

•

The tax basis for these shares will be the fair market value on the date of exercise.

2.	When the shares which had the restrictive legend are sold, you will be subject to capital gains tax assuming the holding requirements have been met.

•

You should address this question to a tax advisor when these shares are sold to ensure compliance with the then current tax code.

May I have this concept in picture form?

1.	Yes; refer to exhibit IV.

COMBINATION OF DEFERRAL AND RELOAD

Is possible to defer the gains from a stock option exercise and receive a reload option grant in the same exercise?

1.	Yes! You may elect to defer the stock option gains by having a deferral agreement on file a minimum of six months and exercise by paying the exercise price with mature shares by attestation.

•

The profit shares will be deferred in accordance with the instructions in your deferral agreement as previously described.

•

A reload stock option will be granted again as previously described for reloads.

•

The number of shares in the reload grant will equal the number of shares “attested” to at exercise.

•

The term of the reload option will end on the time and date of the original grant.

	•	The shares in the reload option will be immediately vested.
	•	The exercise price per share will be the fair market value of one share on the date the original option is exercised.

Are holding requirements imposed on the reload shares if profit shares from the original option are deferred?

1.	NO. If a reload option is granted in conjunction with the deferral of gains from the original option, there is no holding requirement on the shares received when the reload option is exercised.

What are the tax consequences for the combination deferral/reload exercise?

1.	The deferral will be taxed as previously described. FICA will be due on exercise - ordinary income tax due on the value at the time of distribution of the deferred shares plus dividends and interest on distribution.

Is possible to defer the gains from the reload grant shares?

1.	YES: The gains from reload shares may be deferred in the same manner as deferring the gains from any option grant.

•

You must have a deferral agreement in place six months (minimum) prior to the deferral exercise, and

•

the exercise price must be paid by “attestation” with “mature” shares!

Please refer to Exhibit V for an outline of the reload/deferral concept.

EXHIBIT 10.7(c)

OTHER COMPENSATION FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

The principal compensation arrangements and practices for the registrant's non-employee directors generally are governed by the registrant’s Director Policy. Relevant portions of the Director Policy are filed as a separate exhibit (listed as Exhibit 10.5(n) to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2006). The registrant reimburses its directors for their expenses incurred in attending meetings. The registrant does not consider this to be compensatory. In addition, the following benefits have been approved by the Board as additional compensation to non-employee directors for service as a director:

a personal account executive;

a no fee personal checking account for the director and his or her spouse;

a FirstCheck debit card;

a no fee VISA card;

no fee for a safe deposit box;

no fee for traveler's checks and cashier's checks; and

if the Board has authorized a stock repurchase program, the repurchase of shares of the registrant's common stock at the day's volume-weighted average price with no payment of any fees or commissions if the repurchase of the director's shares is otherwise permissible under the repurchase program that has been authorized.

Directors who are officers of the registrant are not separately compensated for their services as directors.

EXHIBIT 10.7(i)

LIST OF CERTAIN BENEFITS

AVAILABLE TO CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following benefits are available to some or all executive officers (among other persons), but not to all full-time employees of the registrant.

If the Board has authorized a stock repurchase program, an executive may request the repurchase of shares of the registrant at the day’s volume-weighted average price with no payment of any fees or commissions if the repurchase of the shares is otherwise permissible under the authorized program.

An automobile allowance is paid to certain executive officers and others up to a limit. The limit applicable to the CEO for 2006 was $19,150 annually. Certain maintenance and repair expenses associated with automobiles are included in the allowance. Certain maintenance and repair expenses associated with automobiles covered by the allowance are reimbursed by the registrant.

Employees above a certain grade level, including executive officers, who are members of a country club or other social organization and who use the club in part for business purposes may request payment of 50% of the annual dues associated with the club.

The registrant’s disability insurance program generally is available to employees. Persons above a certain grade level, including executive officers, receive an additional benefit and are paid an amount each year intended to reimburse premiums associated with the additional benefit.

The registrant makes available or pays for tax preparation, tax consulting, estate planning, and financial counseling services for executive officers.

The registrant occasionally allows certain employees, including executive officers, or their spouses to travel for personal purposes in company aircraft on trips that occur for business reasons. Such cases typically result in no additional costs for the registrant, since the seat filled would have otherwise been empty, but do result in the recognition of taxable income for the employee involved.

On occasion spouses of certain employees, including executive officers, are asked by the registrant, for business reasons, to accompany the employee on a business trip or function. In those cases the registrant may pay the travel, accommodation, and other expenses of the spouse incidental to the trip or function, some or all of which can result in taxable income for the employee. Also, on occasion the registrant may provide or pay for a memento, gift, or other gratuity that the employee or spouse receives in connection with the business trip or function.

The registrant provides a relocation benefit to a wide range of employees, including executive officers, under varying circumstances and subject to certain constraints. The benefit may be in the form of an allowance or a reimbursement of actual expenses.

The registrant offers certain health club benefits to a wide range of employees, including executive officers.

10)

The registrant provides a cash allowance to certain employees, including executive officers, which is intended to defray expenses associated with goods and services purchased personally and used at least in part for business purposes (such as cell phone service).

FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Selected Financial and Operating Data		2
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
General Information		3
Forward-Looking Statements		3
Financial Summary		4
Business Line Review		5
Income Statement Review - 2006 compared to 2005		7
Statement of Condition Review - 2006 compared to 2005		16
Income Statement Review - 2005 compared to 2004		20
Statement of Condition Review - 2005 compared to 2004		21
Capital		21
Risk Management		23
Critical Accounting Policies		38
Quarterly Financial Information		47
Accounting Changes		47
Glossary of Selected Financial Terms		50
Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting		53
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		54
Consolidated Statements of Condition		57
Consolidated Statements of Income		58
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity		59
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		60
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		61
Consolidated Historical Statements of Income		118
Consolidated Average Balance Sheets and Related Yields and Rates		119
Information Concerning Certain Officer Certifications		121
Total Shareholder Return Performance Graph		122

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

(Dollars in millions except per share data)

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

Income from continuing operations

$

250.8

$

410.7

$

430.1

$

445.2

$

355.3

$

286.1

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

210.8

17.1

15.6

7.4

6.6

8.9

Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle

461.6

427.8

445.7

452.6

361.9

295.0

Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax

1.3

(3.1

)

—

—

—

(8.2

)

Net income

462.9

424.7

445.7

452.6

361.9

286.8

Common Stock Data

Earnings per common share from continuing operations

$

2.02

$

3.27

$

3.45

$

3.51

$

2.80

$

2.24

Earnings per common share before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle

3.71

3.41

3.57

3.57

2.86

2.31

Earnings per common share

3.72

3.38

3.57

3.57

2.86

2.24

Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations

1.96

3.17

3.35

3.40

2.73

2.17

Diluted earnings per common share before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle

3.61

3.31

3.47

3.46

2.78

2.24

Diluted earnings per common share

3.62

3.28

3.47

3.46

2.78

2.18

Cash dividends declared per common share

1.80

1.74

1.63

1.30

1.05

.91

Year-end book value per common share

19.61

18.46

16.66

15.26

13.56

11.83

Closing price of common stock per share:

High

42.76

44.55

48.01

47.98

40.45

37.25

Low

37.20

35.13

41.59

36.14

30.05

27.38

Year-end

41.78

38.44

43.11

44.10

35.94

36.26

Dividends per common share/year-end closing price

4.3

%

4.5

%

3.8

%

2.9

%

2.9

%

2.5

%

Dividends per common share/diluted earnings per common share

49.7

53.0

47.0

37.6

37.8

41.7

Price/earnings ratio

11.5

x

11.7

x

12.4

x

12.7

x

12.9

x

16.6

x

Market capitalization

$

5,246.4

$

4,888.7

$

5,368.0

$

5,552.0

$

4,553.9

$

4,597.0

Average shares (thousands)

124,453

125,475

124,730

126,765

126,714

127,777

Average diluted shares (thousands)

127,917

129,364

128,436

130,876

130,221

131,538

Period-end shares outstanding (thousands)

124,866

126,222

123,532

124,834

125,600

125,865

Volume of shares traded (thousands)

176,158

162,220

173,177

176,528

139,946

110,154

Selected Average Balances

Total assets

$

38,764.6

$

36,560.4

$

27,305.8

$

25,133.6

$

20,704.0

$

19,227.2

Total loans*

21,504.2

18,334.7

15,440.5

12,679.8

10,645.6

10,118.8

Investment securities

3,451.5

2,880.0

2,449.1

2,544.9

2,466.4

2,595.3

Earning assets

34,012.3

31,950.0

23,718.3

21,328.9

17,397.4

16,125.4

Deposits

22,751.7

23,015.8

17,635.5

16,111.6

13,674.8

12,540.6

Long-term debt

5,062.4

2,560.1

2,248.0

1,342.9

685.5

521.5

Shareholders’ equity

2,423.0

2,177.0

1,937.7

1,829.4

1,592.5

1,423.0

Selected Period-End Balances

Total assets

$

37,918.3

$

36,579.1

$

29,771.7

$

24,506.7

$

23,823.1

$

20,621.6

Total loans*

22,104.9

20,612.0

16,441.9

14,021.3

11,369.8

10,291.9

Investment securities

3,890.4

2,912.5

2,681.0

2,470.4

2,700.3

2,525.9

Earning assets

32,320.2

31,578.0

25,952.3

20,621.1

19,999.8

17,085.7

Deposits

20,213.2

23,317.6

19,757.0

15,855.4

16,149.8

13,842.8

Long-term debt

5,836.4

3,437.6

2,616.4

1,726.8

929.7

550.4

Shareholders’ equity

2,462.4

2,347.5

2,074.1

1,921.6

1,717.9

1,499.5

Selected Ratios

Return on average shareholders’ equity from continuing operations

10.35

%

18.87

%

22.19

%

24.34

%

22.31

%

20.10

%

Return on average shareholders’ equity before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle

19.05

19.65

23.00

24.74

22.73

20.73

Return on average shareholders’ equity

19.11

19.51

23.00

24.74

22.73

20.16

Return on average assets from continuing operations

.65

1.12

1.58

1.77

1.72

1.49

Return on average assets before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle

1.19

1.17

1.63

1.80

1.75

1.53

Return on average assets

1.19

1.16

1.63

1.80

1.75

1.49

Net interest margin

2.93

3.08

3.62

3.78

4.35

4.29

Allowance for loan losses to loans*

.98

.92

.96

1.15

1.27

1.46

Net charge-offs to average loans*

.26

.21

.27

.54

.93

.80

Period-end shareholders’ equity to period-end assets

6.49

6.42

6.97

7.84

7.21

7.27

Average tangible equity to average tangible assets

5.39

4.97

6.36

6.48

6.82

6.77

* Net of unearned income.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

GENERAL INFORMATION

First Horizon National Corporation (FHN) is a national financial services institution. From a small community bank chartered in 1864, FHN has grown to be one of the top 30 largest bank holding companies in the United States in terms of asset size.

The 12,000 employees provide a broad array of financial services to individual and business customers through hundreds of offices located in 46 states.

FHN companies have been recognized as some of the nation’s best employers by AARP, Working Mother and Fortune magazines. FHN also was named one of the nation’s 100 best corporate citizens by Business Ethics magazine.

FHN provides a broad array of financial services to its customers through three national businesses. The combined strengths of our businesses create an extensive range of financial products and services. In addition, the corporate segment provides essential support within the corporation.


	•	Retail/Commercial Banking offers financial products and services, including traditional lending and deposit taking, to retail and commercial customers. Additionally, the retail/commercial bank provides investments, insurance, financial planning, trust services and asset management, credit card, cash management, check clearing, and correspondent services.

	•	Mortgage Banking helps provide home ownership through First Horizon Home Loans, which operates offices in 45 states and is one of the top 20 mortgage servicers and top 25 originators of mortgage loans to consumers. This segment consists of core mortgage banking elements including originations and servicing and the associated ancillary revenues related to these businesses.

	•	Capital Markets provides a broad spectrum of financial services for the investment and banking communities through the integration of capital markets securities activities, equity research and investment banking.

	•	Corporate consists of unallocated corporate expenses, expense on subordinated debt issuances and preferred stock, bank-owned life insurance, unallocated interest income associated with excess equity, net impact of raising incremental capital, revenue and expense associated with deferred compensation plans, funds management, and venture capital.

For the purpose of this management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A), earning assets have been expressed as averages, and loans have been disclosed net of unearned income. The following financial discussion should be read with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes. A glossary is included at the end of the MD&A to assist with terminology.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This MD&A contains forward-looking statements with respect to FHN’s beliefs, plans, goals, expectations, and estimates. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not a representation of historical information but rather are related to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “should,” “is likely,” “will,” “going forward,” and other expressions that indicate future events and trends identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, operational, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond a company’s control, and many of which, with respect to future business decisions and actions (including acquisitions and divestitures), are subject to change. Examples of uncertainties and contingencies include, among other important factors, general and local economic and business conditions; expectations of and actual timing and amount of interest rate movements,

including the slope of the yield curve (which can have a significant impact on a financial services institution); market and monetary fluctuations; inflation or deflation; customer and investor responses to these conditions; the financial condition of borrowers and other counterparties; competition within and outside the financial services industry; geopolitical developments including possible terrorist activity; natural disasters; effectiveness of FHN’s hedging practices; technology; demand for FHN’s product offerings; new products and services in the industries in which FHN operates; and critical accounting estimates. Other factors are those inherent in originating and servicing loans including prepayment risks, pricing concessions, fluctuation in U.S. housing prices, fluctuation of collateral values, and changes in customer profiles. Additionally, the actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and other regulators; regulatory and judicial proceedings and changes in laws and regulations applicable to FHN; and FHN’s success in executing its business plans and strategies and managing the risks involved in the foregoing, could cause actual results to differ. FHN assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements that are made from time to time. Actual results could differ because of several factors, including those presented in this Forward-Looking Statements section.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

Earnings for 2006 were $462.9 million, or $3.62 diluted earnings per share. Earnings for 2005 were $424.7 million, or $3.28 diluted earnings per share.

Comparisons between earnings in 2006 and 2005 are directly and significantly affected by a number of factors that were present in 2006 but not present (or present to a much lesser degree) in 2005. FHN’s performance in 2006 was impacted by a gain related to the divestiture of merchant processing operations and transactions through which the incremental capital provided by the divestiture was utilized. Additionally, performance in 2006 was impacted by estimated settlement costs related to a class action lawsuit, various other transactions and accounting matters.

On March 1, 2006, FHN sold its national merchant processing business for an after-tax gain of $209 million. This divestiture was accounted for as a discontinued operation, and accordingly, current and prior periods were adjusted to exclude the impact of merchant operations from the results of continuing operations. In tandem with the merchant sale, FHN purchased 4 million shares of its common stock to minimize the potentially dilutive effect of the merchant divestiture on future earnings per share. Also included in results from continuing operations are net securities losses of $65.6 million, predominantly related to repositioning approximately $2.3 billion of investment securities, net of gains from the sale of MasterCard, Inc. securities and venture capital investments.

Various other items impacted results from continuing operations in 2006, including estimated settlement costs of $21.9 million for a class action lawsuit (see also Note 18 – Restrictions, Contingencies and Other Disclosures for additional detail). In addition, revenues in 2006 were negatively impacted by a $15.6 million cumulative adjustment related to derivative transactions used in hedging strategies to manage interest rate risk that management determined did not qualify for hedge accounting under the “short cut” method (see also Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements for additional detail). A pre-tax loss of $12.7 million was recognized from the sale of home equity lines of credit (HELOC) upon which the borrower had not drawn funds. The loss represented deferred loan origination costs, generally recognized over the life of the loan, which were recognized when the line of credit was sold. Retail/Commercial banking experienced losses due to certain misrepresentations within the construction lending business and due to a customer initiated deposit scheme in the full-service banking markets. Mortgage banking experienced foreclosure losses and other expenses related to nonprime mortgage loans. In addition, expenses associated with devaluing inventories, consolidating operations and closing offices, incremental expenditures on technology and compensation expense related to early retirement, severance and retention were recognized in 2006 but will reduce costs and should improve performance going forward. 2006 earnings also included a favorable impact of $1.3 million, or $.01 per diluted share from the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles compared to an unfavorable impact of $3.1 million, or $.03 per diluted share in 2005.

Business operations reflected continued progress within Retail/Commercial Banking with loan growth of 16 percent and deposit growth of 9 percent compared to 2005. This was achieved through growth within the Tennessee banking franchise and continued expansion into new markets. FHN’s leading market position in Tennessee has grown through the addition of financial centers and successful marketing to customers of merging banks.

Additionally, national expansion continues to favorably impact the bank’s performance through successful cross-sell penetration to mortgage customers and growth of the banking franchise in national markets.

Capital Markets continued its product diversification in 2006 and increased revenues from products other than fixed income by $52.2 million. Pre-tax income increased 81 percent despite lower revenues from fixed income sales, which continued to reflect the subdued demand for fixed income products associated with the current interest rate environment. Capital Markets began to implement measures in fourth quarter 2006 to improve the long-term positioning and profitability of its business including reorganizing the fixed income sales force and restructuring certain trading platforms.

Additionally, the interest rate environment and housing slow-down negatively impacted Mortgage Banking results in 2006 which produced only 1 percent of pre-tax income in 2006 compared to 31 percent in 2005. During 2006 management has focused on consolidating Mortgage Banking’s sales management structure, closing unprofitable locations, and reducing non-sales headcount in order to position the business for increased profitability in 2007.

Return on average shareholders’ equity and return on average assets for 2006 were 19.1 percent and 1.19 percent, respectively, compared to 19.5 percent and 1.16 percent in 2005. Total assets were $37.9 billion and shareholders’ equity was $2.5 billion on December 31, 2006, compared to $36.6 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, on December 31, 2005.

BUSINESS LINE REVIEW

Retail/Commercial Banking
Pre-tax income decreased 2 percent to $434.1 million in 2006 compared to $442.7 million in 2005. Total revenues increased 6 percent, or $73.6 million, in 2006.

Net interest income increased 6 percent to $915.5 million in 2006 from $862.4 million in 2005. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to 16 percent loan growth, with commercial loans growing 19 percent to $10.4 billion from $8.7 billion and retail loans growing 14 percent to $10.8 billion from $9.5 billion, reflecting increased market share in Tennessee, expansion into other markets, the addition of middle market lending to the Atlanta, Dallas and Virginia markets, and continued economic growth. Deposit account balances increased 9 percent compared to 2005. Net interest margin in Retail/Commercial Banking was 4.21 percent in 2006 compared to 4.30 percent in 2005.

Noninterest income grew 5 percent, or $20.6 million, in 2006. Fees from deposit service charges increased 8 percent, or $12.3 million, primarily reflecting deposit growth. Revenue from loan sales and securitizations increased $4.0 million as FHN continues to utilize loan sales to manage liquidity and fund new loan growth. Also impacting noninterest income in 2006 were $6.2 million of unfavorable market adjustments on HELOC and second-lien mortgages held for sale compared to a negative impact of $16.2 million in 2005, which primarily resulted from the write-off of net capitalized expenses on HELOC held for sale as they prepaid faster than anticipated. Noninterest income from insurance commissions declined $7.4 million primarily due to the sale of two insurance subsidiaries in 2006, which resulted in a gain of $2.6 million. In 2005, gains of $7.0 million resulted from the sale of three financial centers.

The provision for loan losses increased to $83.2 million in 2006 from $67.1 million in 2005. The provision for 2005 included $3.8 million related to expected hurricane losses. This increase primarily reflects continued growth of the commercial and construction loan portfolios, the increase in the level of impaired loans in the commercial and construction loan portfolios and an expectation of slowing economic growth.

Noninterest expense was $839.5 million in 2006 compared to $773.4 million in 2005 reflecting losses due to certain misrepresentations within the construction lending business and due to a customer initiated deposit scheme in the full-service banking markets, costs associated with inventory valuation and closing of retail sites in the coin commodity business; incremental costs associated with national businesses; consolidation of remittance processing operations and office closings; and early retirement and severance costs.

Mortgage Banking
Pre-tax income was $1.9 million in 2006 compared to $187.2 million in 2005. Total revenues decreased 27 percent or $174.0 million in 2006 to $476.9 million.

Net interest income decreased 38 percent to $91.7 million in 2006 from $147.5 million in 2005. Net interest income was negatively impacted by a 16 percent decline in the warehouse and the flattening and inversion of the yield curve which resulted in compression of the spread on the warehouse. Spread on the warehouse was 1.42 percent in 2006 compared to 2.47 percent for 2005.

Noninterest income decreased 23 percent to $385.2 million in 2006 compared to $503.4 million in 2005. Noninterest income consists primarily of mortgage banking-related revenue, net of costs, from the origination and sale of mortgage loans, fees from mortgage servicing and changes in fair value of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) net of hedge gains or losses. Mortgage servicing noninterest income, prior to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (SFAS No. 156) in first quarter 2006, was net of amortization, impairment and other expenses related to MSR and related hedges. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 156, mortgage servicing noninterest income reflects the change in fair value of the MSR asset combined with net economic hedging results.

Mortgage loan origination volumes decreased 24 percent to $27.1 billion in 2006 from $35.7 billion in 2005, as home purchase-related originations declined 19 percent, or $4.0 billion, and refinance activity decreased 31 percent, or $4.6 billion. Loans delivered into the secondary market decreased 22 percent to $26.9 billion from $34.6 billion. Net revenue from origination activity decreased 22 percent to $308.1 million from $395.4 million in 2005.

The mortgage-servicing portfolio (which includes servicing for ourselves and others) grew 6 percent to $101.4 billion on December 31, 2006, from $95.3 billion on December 31, 2005. Total fees associated with mortgage servicing increased 17 percent to $328.3 million from $280.2 million, reflecting growth in the servicing portfolio, including lower prepayment activity, and the favorable impact of an increase in the mix of higher fee products. Servicing hedging activities and changes in MSR value negatively impacted net servicing revenues by $68.7 million in 2006 as compared to 2005. Changes in the value of MSR due to factors other than runoff net of hedge results reflected a net loss of $7.5 million in 2006 compared to a net gain of $91.0 million in 2005. Specifically, significant flattening of the yield curve reduced net interest income derived from swaps utilized to hedge MSR. Although MSR that prepaid this year were more valuable than a year ago, overall prepayments declined with lower refinance activity, causing the change in MSR value due to runoff to decrease to $258.4 million in 2006 from $271.1 million in 2005. In addition, decreased option expense on servicing hedges resulted in an $18.0 million increase in servicing income compared to 2005.

Noninterest expense was $475.1 million in 2006 compared to $463.1 million in 2005. This increase reflects the unfavorable impacts of estimated settlement costs of $21.9 million for a class action lawsuit, higher level of losses associated with the nonprime origination business and costs associated with branch closings, including lease abandonment and severance expenses. These impacts, however, were largely offset by reductions in personnel expense directly related to the reduction of compensation due to contraction in origination revenue, reductions in support headcount and the closure of unprofitable locations.

Capital Markets
Pre-tax income increased from $26.4 million in 2005 to $47.7 million in 2006. Total revenues were $379.9 million in 2006 compared to $336.6 million in 2005.

Revenues from products other than fixed income increased $52.2 million to $215.2 million in 2006. Revenues from other products include fee income from activities such as structured finance, equity research, investment banking, loan sales, portfolio advisory and the sale of bank-owned life insurance. This increase was primarily due to increased fees from structured finance and other investment banking activities, partially offset by decreases in equity research and loan sales revenues. These other sources of revenue represented 54 percent and 45 percent, respectively, of total product revenues in 2006 and 2005. Revenues from fixed income sales decreased $21.9

million to $180.2 million in 2006 reflecting the continuing subdued demand for fixed income products associated with the current interest rate environment.

Net interest expense decreased $13.1 million, primarily due to improved execution that decreased nonearning asset funding costs and an increase in net earning assets.

Noninterest expense increased 7 percent, or $22.0 million, to $332.2 million in 2006, primarily due to variable compensation related to the increase in product revenues as well as severance and retirement related costs as the business was repositioned to reflect the current environment.

Corporate
The Corporate segment’s results yielded a pre-tax loss of $145.6 million in 2006 compared to a pre-tax loss of $59.6 million in 2005. Net security losses were $65.6 million in 2006, primarily resulting from the restructuring of the investment portfolio in first quarter 2006, net of gains from the sale of MasterCard Inc. securities and venture capital investments, compared to net security losses of $.6 million in 2005. Also impacting 2006 was the negative $15.6 million cumulative impact of derivative transactions used in hedging strategies to manage interest rate risk that management determined did not qualify for hedge accounting under the “short cut” method and an increase of $7.4 million related to dividend expense on $300.0 million of FTBNA’s noncumulative perpetual preferred stock. In addition, revenue included $15.0 million in 2006 and $8.0 million in 2005 related to deferred compensation plans, which was offset by a related $20.4 million in 2006 and $12.7 million in 2005 in expense associated with these plans.

INCOME STATEMENT REVIEW – 2006 COMPARED TO 2005

Total consolidated revenue decreased 6 percent to $2,163.8 million from $2,291.3 million in 2005, primarily due to the contraction in mortgage banking revenue and net securities losses. A more detailed discussion of the major line items follows.

NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income remained stable at $996.9 million in 2006 compared to $984.0 million in 2005 as earning assets grew 6 percent to $34.0 billion and interest-bearing liabilities grew 7 percent to $29.3 billion in 2006. See also the Consolidated Average Balance Sheet and Related Yields and Rates table.

The activity levels and related funding for FHN’s mortgage production and servicing and capital markets activities affect the net interest margin. These activities typically produce different margins than traditional banking activities. Mortgage production and servicing activities can affect the overall margin based on a number of factors, including the shape of the yield curve, the size of the mortgage warehouse, the time it takes to deliver loans into the secondary market, the amount of custodial balances, and the level of MSR. Capital Markets’ activities tend to compress the margin because of its strategy to reduce market risk by economically hedging a portion of its inventory on the balance sheet. As a result of these impacts, FHN’s consolidated margin cannot be readily compared to that of other bank holding companies. Table 1 details the computation of the net interest margin for FHN for the last three years.

The consolidated net interest margin was 2.93 percent for 2006 compared to 3.08 percent for 2005. This compression in the margin occurred as the net interest spread decreased to 2.31 percent from 2.64 percent in 2005 while the impact of free funding increased from 44 basis points to 62 basis points. The decline in the margin is attributable to an inverted yield curve, which decreased spread on the mortgage warehouse by 105 basis points to 1.42 percent.


Table 1 - Net Interest Margin

	2006			2005			2004

Consolidated yields and rates:
Loans, net of unearned income		7.40	%		6.18	%		5.02	%
Loans held for sale		6.64			6.32			5.50
Investment securities		5.43			4.34			4.28
Capital markets securities inventory		5.33			4.70			3.56
Mortgage banking trading securities		10.84			12.27			12.05
Other earning assets		4.79			2.87			1.06

Yields on earning assets		6.85			5.76			4.92

Interest-bearing core deposits		2.98			2.03			1.39
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more		5.06			3.34			1.57
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		4.58			2.98			1.22
Capital markets trading liabilities		5.68			5.28			3.80
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings		5.04			3.55			1.96
Long-term debt		5.55			3.96			2.24

Rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities		4.54			3.12			1.59

Net interest spread		2.31			2.64			3.33
Effect of interest-free sources		.62			.44			.29

FHN - NIM		2.93	%		3.08	%		3.62	%

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

In the near-term, a modest compression of the net interest margin is expected as further inversion of the yield curve generally has a continued unfavorable impact on the net interest margin primarily from narrower spreads on the mortgage warehouse. Over the long term, FHN’s strategies to manage the interest rate sensitivity of the balance sheet position are designed to allow the net interest margin to improve in a steeper yield curve environment. Flattening in the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates generally has an unfavorable impact on net interest margin, primarily from narrower spreads on the mortgage warehouse.

Table 2 shows how the changes in yields or rates and average balances compared to the prior year affected net interest income.

Table 2 - Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income


	2006 Compared to 2005									2005 Compared to 2004
	Increase / (Decrease) Due to*									Increase / (Decrease) Due to*
(Fully taxable equivalent)
(Dollars in thousands)		Rate**		Volume**			Total			Rate**			Volume**			Total

Interest income - FTE:
Loans		$243,447			$ 214,043			$ 457,490			$199,760		$ 159,060				$358,820
Loans held for sale		18,644			(108,365	)		(89,721	)		38,095			112,955			151,050
Investment securities:
U.S. Treasury		1,122			489			1,611			391			(125	)		266
U.S. government agencies		32,608			25,552			58,160			547			18,978			19,525
States and municipalities		(117	)		(93	)		(210	)		(135	)		(333	)		(468	)
Other		1,168			1,553			2,721			863			130			993

Total investment securities		34,708			27,574			62,282			1,888			18,428			20,316

Capital markets securities inventory		14,265			11,893			26,158			11,064			63,509			74,573
Mortgage banking trading securities		(4,695	)		11,161			6,466			563			10,007			10,570
Other earning assets:
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell		37,941			(12,884	)		25,057			25,531			32,347			57,878
Investment in bank time deposits		174			1,077			1,251			197			(5	)		192

Total other earning assets		38,400			(12,092	)		26,308			25,810			32,260			58,070

Total earning assets/total interest income - FTE		364,410			124,573			$488,983			224,523			448,876			$673,399

Interest expense:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Savings		$ 38,057			$ 6,018			$ 44,075			$ 22,994			$ 1,845			$ 24,839
Time deposits		19,529			21,734			41,263			9,261			9,692			18,953
Other interest-bearing deposits		8,326			705			9,031			9,744			884			10,628

Total interest-bearing core deposits		72,380			21,989			94,369			42,761			11,659			54,420

Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more		170,917			(41,723	)		129,194			168,797			87,183			255,980
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		72,868			(576	)		72,292			78,305			13,201			91,506
Capital markets trading liabilities		5,840			(9,967	)		(4,127	)		10,401			49,773			60,174
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings		12,752			(8,065	)		4,687			3,787			28,903			32,690
Long-term debt		52,439			127,173			179,612			43,163			7,723			50,886

Total interest-bearing liabilities/total interest expense		412,020			64,007			$476,027			386,333			159,323			$545,656

Net interest income - FTE								$ 12,956									$127,743

*	The changes in interest due to both rate and volume have been allocated to change due to rate and change due to volume in proportion to the absolute amounts of the changes in each.
**	Variances are computed on a line-by-line basis and are non-additive.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

NONINTEREST INCOME
Noninterest income contributed 54 percent to total revenue in 2006 compared with 57 percent in 2005. Noninterest income decreased $140.4 million. Impacting this decline were decreases in mortgage banking noninterest income and net securities losses, partially offset by increases in capital markets noninterest income and deposit transactions and cash management fees. Table 3 provides six years of detailed information concerning FHN’s noninterest income. The following discussion provides additional information about various line items reported in the table.


Table 3 - Noninterest Income																		Compound Annual Growth Rates (%)

(Dollars in thousands )	2006			2005			2004		2003			2002			2001			06/05			06/01

Noninterest income:
Capital markets		$ 383,047			$ 353,005			$ 376,558		$ 538,919			$ 448,016			$ 344,278			8.5	+		2.2	+
Mortgage banking		370,613			479,619			444,758		649,496			436,706			285,032			22.7	-		5.4	+
Deposit transactions and cash management		168,599			156,190			148,511		146,696			143,308			133,624			7.9	+		4.8	+
Revenue from loan sales and securitizations		51,675			47,575			23,115		—			2,250			—			8.6	+		NM
Insurance commissions		46,632			54,091			56,109		57,811			50,446			16,844			13.8	-		22.6	+
Trust services and investment management		41,514			44,614			47,274		45,873			48,369			56,705			6.9	-		6.0	-
Equity securities gains/(losses), net		10,271			(579	)		2,040		8,491			(9,435	)		(3,290	)		NM			NM
Debt securities (losses)/gains, net		(75,900	)		1			18,708		(6,113	)		255			(1,041	)		NM			NM
Gains on divestitures		—			7,029			1,200		12,498			2,300			60,426			NM			NM
All other income and commissions:
Brokerage management fees and commissions		37,182			30,865			28,590		23,215			20,550			19,053			20.5	+		14.3	+
Bankcard income		26,105			27,136			24,993		22,587			20,290			19,849			3.8	-		5.6	+
Bank-owned life insurance		19,064			16,335			12,842		13,763			12,719			11,910			16.7	+		9.9	+
Remittance processing		14,737			15,411			19,515		23,666			26,016			22,820			4.4	-		8.4	-
Deferred compensation		14,647			7,721			8,633		4,575			—			—			89.7	+		NM
Other service charges		14,561			14,330			11,498		11,720			14,422			17,447			1.6	+		3.6	-
Letter of credit fees		7,271			7,883			6,793		4,944			5,367			4,779			7.8	-		8.8	+
ATM interchange fees		7,091			5,995			4,973		4,113			1,917			320			18.3	+		85.8	+
Reinsurance fees		6,792			5,850			5,913		6,224			6,200			5,384			16.1	+		4.8	+
Check clearing fees		6,385			7,333			10,052		11,839			13,180			11,615			12.9	-		11.3	-
Electronic banking fees		5,975			5,977			6,071		6,311			6,657			6,771			—			2.5	-
Federal flood certifications		4,996			9,359			5,375		4,161			5,555			4,382			46.6	-		2.7	+
Other		5,636			11,516			18,310		8,608			8,014			11,846			51.1	-		13.8	-

Total all other income and commissions		170,442			165,711			163,558		145,726			140,887			136,176			2.9	+		4.6	+

Total noninterest income		$1,166,893			$1,307,256			$1,281,831		$1,599,397			$1,263,102			$1,028,754			10.7	-		2.6	+

NM - Due to the variable nature of these items the growth rate is considered to be not meaningful.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Capital Markets
Capital markets noninterest income, the major component of revenue in the Capital Markets segment, is generated from the purchase and sale of securities as both principal and agent, and from other fee sources including structured finance, equity research, investment banking, loan sales, and portfolio advisory activities. Inventory positions are limited to the procurement of securities solely for distribution to customers by the sales staff. Inventory is hedged to protect against movements in fair value due to changes in interest rates.

Capital markets noninterest income increased to $383.0 million in 2006 from $353.0 million in 2005. Revenues from other products represented 53 percent of total noninterest income in 2006 compared to 43 percent in 2005. These revenues increased $52.0 million primarily due to increased fees from structured finance and investment banking activities, partially offset by decreases in equity research and loan sales revenues. Revenues from fixed income sales decreased $21.9 million from 2005 reflecting the continuing subdued demand for fixed income products associated with the current interest rate environment.

Table 4 - Capital Markets Noninterest Income


							Compound Annual Growth Rates (%)

(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004		06/05			06/04

Noninterest income:
Fixed income		$180,183		$202,105		$232,917		10.8	-		12.0	-
Other product revenue		202,864		150,900		143,641		34.4	+		18.8	+

Total capital markets noninterest income		$383,047		$353,005		$376,558		8.5	+		.9	+

Mortgage Banking
First Horizon Home Loans, an indirect subsidiary of FHN, offers residential mortgage banking products and services to customers, which consist primarily of the origination or purchase of single-family residential mortgage loans. First Horizon Home Loans originates mortgage loans through its retail and wholesale operations and also purchases mortgage loans from third-party mortgage bankers (correspondent brokers) for sale to secondary market investors and subsequently services the majority of those loans. Table 5 provides a summary of First Horizon Home Loans’ production/origination of mortgage loans during 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Table 5 - Production/Origination of Mortgage Loans


	2006			2005			2004

Retail channel		57	%		57	%		57	%
Wholesale channel		40			38			36
Correspondent brokers		3			5			7

Mortgage banking noninterest income decreased 23 percent in 2006 to $370.6 million from $479.6 million in 2005 as shown in Table 6.

Origination income includes origination fees, net of costs, gains or losses recognized on loans sold including the capitalized fair value of MSR, and the value recognized on loans in process including results from hedging. Origination fees, net of costs (including incentives and other direct costs), are deferred and included in the basis of the loans in calculating gains and losses upon sale. Gain or loss is recognized due to changes in fair value of an interest rate lock commitment made to the customer. Gains or losses from the sale of loans are recognized at the time a mortgage loan is sold into the secondary market. In 2004, FHN adopted SAB No. 105, which prohibited the inclusion of estimated servicing cash flows within the valuation of interest rate lock commitments under SFAS No. 133. Previously, FHN included a portion of the value of the associated servicing cash flows when recognizing loan commitments at inception and throughout their lives. The adoption of SAB No. 105, which lowered pre-tax earnings by $8.4 million in 2004, did not affect the ongoing economic value of this business. Origination income decreased 22 percent or $87.3 million as loans delivered into the secondary market decreased 22 percent to $26.9 billion, reflecting lower origination volume.

Servicing income includes servicing fees and net gains or losses from hedging MSR. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 156 in first quarter 2006, mortgage servicing noninterest income was net of amortization, impairment and other expenses related to MSR and related hedges. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 156, mortgage servicing noninterest income reflects the change in fair value of the MSR asset combined with net economic hedging results. First Horizon Home Loans employs hedging strategies intended to counter changes in the value of MSR and other retained interests due to changing interest rate environments (refer to discussion of MSR under Critical Accounting Policies). Servicing income decreased 36 percent or $20.7 million in 2006.

As the mortgage-servicing portfolio grew 6 percent in 2006, total fees associated with mortgage servicing increased 17 percent or $48.1 million. This growth was also favorably impacted by an increase in the mix of higher fee products. Changes in the value of MSR due to factors other than runoff, net of hedge results, reflected a net loss of $7.5 million in 2006 compared to a net gain of $91.0 million in 2005. Specifically, significant flattening of the yield curve reduced net interest income derived from swaps utilized to hedge MSR. Although MSR that prepaid this year were more valuable than a year ago, overall prepayments declined with lower refinance activity, causing the

change in MSR value due to runoff to decrease to $258.4 million from $271.1 million in 2005. In addition, decreased option expense on servicing hedges resulted in an $18.0 million increase in servicing income compared to 2005.

Table 6 - Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income


							Compound Annual Growth Rates (%)

	2006		2005		2004		06/05			06/04

*Noninterest income (thousands)* :**
Origination income	$	308,099	$	395,395	$	339,845		22.1	-		4.8	-
Servicing income		37,517		58,188		83,796		35.5	-		33.1	-
Other		24,997		26,036		21,117		4.0	-		8.8	+

Total mortgage banking noninterest income	$	370,613	$	479,619	$	444,758		22.7	-		8.7	-

*Mortgage banking statistics (millions)* :**
Refinance originations	$	10,226.7	$	14,778.8	$	13,791.5		30.8	-		13.9	-
Home-purchase originations		16,887.6		20,903.1		16,673.8		19.2	-		.6	+

Mortgage loan originations	$	27,114.3	$	35,681.9	$	30,465.3		24.0	-		5.7	-

Servicing portfolio	$	101,369.2	$	95,283.8	$	86,586.9		6.4	+		8.2	+

Other income includes FHN’s share of earnings from nonconsolidated subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method, which provide ancillary activities to mortgage banking, and fees from retail construction lending.

Going forward, revenues from mortgage originations and mortgage servicing will depend primarily on interest rates. Specifically, an increase in interest rates should reduce origination income but increase servicing revenues due to reduced overall originations and the slow down of prepayments, respectively. Strengthening of the housing market should increase origination income but a resulting increase in payoffs could reduce servicing income. Net growth in sales force could result in increased volume of loans originated. Actual results could differ because of several factors, including those presented in the Forward-Looking Statements section of the MD&A discussion.

Deposit Transactions and Cash Management
Deposit transactions include services related to retail deposit products (such as service charges on checking accounts), cash management products and services such as electronic transaction processing (automated clearing house and Electronic Data Interchange), account reconciliation services, cash vault services, lockbox processing, and information reporting to large corporate clients. Noninterest income from deposit transactions and cash management increased to $168.6 million in 2006 from $156.2 million in 2005, reflecting deposit growth and pricing initiatives.

Revenue from Loan Sales and Securitizations
Revenue from loan sales and securitizations includes net gains recognized on HELOC and second-lien mortgage loans sold, including changes in the fair value of MSR, servicing fees, and gains or losses related to fair value adjustments on retained interests classified as mortgage trading securities. Noninterest income from loans sales and securitizations increased to $51.7 million in 2006 compared to $47.6 million in 2005 as FHN continues to utilize loan sales and securitizations to manage liquidity and fund new loan growth. Results for 2006 include the loss of $12.7 million from the sale of no-balance HELOC.

Insurance Commissions
Insurance commissions are derived from the sale of insurance products, including acting as an independent agent to provide commercial and personal property and casualty, life, long-term care, and disability insurance. Noninterest income from insurance commissions decreased to $46.6 million in 2006 from $54.1 million in 2005 due to the sale of two insurance subsidiaries in 2006.

Trust Services and Investment Management
Trust services and investment management fees include investment management, personal trust, employee benefits, and custodial trust services and are influenced by equity and fixed income market activity. Noninterest income from trust services and investment management was $41.5 million in 2006 compared to $44.6 million in 2005.

Gains on Divestitures
Gains from divestitures totaled $7.0 million in 2005 from the sale of three financial centers in a non-strategic Tennessee market. See Note 2 – Acquisitions/Divestitures for additional information.

Securities Gains/ (Losses)
In 2006 there were $65.6 million of net securities losses compared to $.5 million of net securities losses in 2005. Net securities losses in 2006 are primarily related to restructuring the investment portfolio in first quarter as well as net securities gains from the sale of MasterCard Inc. securities and venture capital investments. The benefit of this restructuring was an increase in the average yield on the investment portfolio. Net securities losses for 2005 were primarily due to other-than-temporary impairment of certain equity securities.

All Other Income and Commissions
All other income, which includes brokerage management fees and commissions, bankcard fees, revenue from bank-owned life insurance, remittance processing income, revenue related to deferred compensation plans (which are principally offset by a related item in noninterest expense), other service charges, and various other fees (see Table 3 for additional detail) was $170.5 million in 2006 compared to $165.7 million in 2005. This increase was led by growth in brokerage management fees and commissions and an increase in the revenue related to deferred compensation plan. These impacts were largely offset by declines in revenue from federal flood certifications and other income. Impacting other income was $6.2 million of negative market adjustments on HELOC held for sale and second-lien mortgages in 2006 compared to a negative impact of $16.2 million in 2005, which primarily resulted from the write-off of net capitalized expenses on HELOC held for sale as they prepaid faster than anticipated. Additionally, impacting 2006 was a negative $15.6 million from the cumulative impact of derivative transactions used in hedging strategies to manage interest rate risk that management determined did not qualify for hedge accounting under the “short cut” method. In 2005 other income included a $7.7 million favorable settlement received from an insurance company.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Total noninterest expense for 2006 increased 7 percent to $1,742.6 million from $1,626.9 million in 2005. Table 8 provides detail by category for the past six years with growth rates.

Employee compensation, incentives and benefits (personnel expense), the largest component of noninterest expense, increased 4 percent to $1,023.7 million from $988.9 million in 2005 primarily due to national expansion initiatives and an increase in variable compensation associated with the growth in capital markets’ product revenues. Also impacting these results was an increase of $7.7 million in 2006 related to deferred compensation plans, for which, as discussed above, there was an associated increase in revenue. Partially offsetting these impacts was a corporate focus on efficiency and reductions in mortgage banking personnel costs due to the contraction in origination revenue in 2006. Early retirement, severance and retention costs also contributed to the increase. Included in personnel expense is the net periodic benefit cost for FHN’s pension plan of $12.2 million in 2006, as compared to $8.1 million in 2005. FHN anticipates, based on current conditions, that net periodic benefit cost for the Pension Plan will decrease by $2.4 million in 2007 due to an increase in the discount rate and the impact of cash contributions to the qualified pension plan, partially offset by normal growth and a decrease in assumed earnings on assets in the qualified pension plan.

Occupancy costs increased 12 percent or $12.5 million primarily due to expansion initiatives. All other noninterest expense, which includes advertising and public relations costs, legal and professional fees, computer software expense, travel and entertainment, contract employment, and various other expense items (see Table 8 for additional detail) increased 22 percent, or $71.2 million in 2006. This increase included the $21.9 million estimated settlement costs related to a class action lawsuit, losses due to certain misrepresentations within the construction

lending business and due to a customer initiated deposit scheme in the full-service banking markets, costs associated with inventory valuations and closing of retail sites in the coin commodity business, higher level of losses associated with the nonprime mortgage origination business, an increase in dividends paid on FTBNA’s noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, incremental costs associated with national businesses, expense associated with consolidating operations and closing offices, and investments in technology.

Table 7 - Noninterest Expense Composition


(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004

Retail/Commercial Banking		$ 839,485		$ 773,437		$ 685,746
Mortgage Banking		475,140		463,048		421,776
Capital Markets		332,191		310,166		295,457
Corporate		95,805		80,243		58,829

Total noninterest expense		$1,742,621		$1,626,894		$1,461,808

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Table 8 - Noninterest Expense


															Compound Annual Growth Rates (%)

(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004		2003		2002			2001			06/05			06/01

Noninterest expense:
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits		$1,023,685		$ 988,946		$ 899,803		$1,004,754		$ 835,824			$ 676,613			3.5	+		8.6	+
Occupancy		116,670		104,161		87,570		81,832		75,281			67,811			12.0	+		11.5	+
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance		73,882		74,367		70,400		67,019		66,691			72,433			.7	-		.4	+
Operations services		70,041		71,949		59,642		59,210		52,233			51,288			2.7	-		6.4	+
Communications and courier		53,249		54,388		47,930		49,122		44,096			41,363			2.1	-		5.2	+
Amortization of intangible assets		11,462		10,700		6,157		5,256		4,970			10,402			7.1	+		2.0	+
All other expense:
Advertising and public relations		47,427		46,321		39,846		43,836		35,943			35,484			2.4	+		6.0	+
Legal and professional fees		43,012		43,734		36,730		58,967		36,786			31,401			1.7	-		6.5	+
Computer software		34,381		28,542		26,719		27,107		24,698			23,879			20.5	+		7.6	+
Travel and entertainment		32,306		31,022		29,914		36,348		21,765			16,999			4.1	+		13.7	+
Contract employment		27,420		30,344		23,722		34,389		28,255			28,838			9.6	-		1.0	-
Distributions on preferred stock of subsidiary		18,146		10,757		—		2,282		4,564			4,535			68.7	+		32.0	+
Low income housing expense		17,027		12,987		13,662		12,132		8,702			6,615			31.1	+		20.8	+
Supplies		15,072		17,290		17,185		18,541		14,879			13,609			12.8	-		2.1	+
Loan closing costs		12,095		7,969		18,623		3,691		(13,329	)		(6,340	)		51.8	+		NM
Customer relations		8,688		9,868		9,167		7,602		6,250			5,496			12.0	-		9.6	+
Other insurance and taxes		8,615		9,349		8,744		10,122		4,894			3,740			7.9	-		18.2	+
Employee training and dues		6,917		6,268		5,956		5,559		3,918			3,221			10.4	+		16.5	+
Loan insurance expense		6,577		7,970		8,070		6,710		1,284			—			17.5	-		NM
Fed service fees		6,543		7,568		8,838		9,195		9,597			7,761			13.5	-		3.4	-
Complimentary check expense		5,371		4,621		3,482		3,168		2,934			2,930			16.2	+		12.9	+
Foreclosed real estate		4,384		3,933		5,834		13,137		21,479			25,452			11.5	+		29.7	-
Bank examinations costs		4,367		3,958		3,128		3,150		2,544			2,357			10.3	+		13.1	+
Deposit insurance premium		3,198		3,012		3,024		2,703		2,393			2,463			6.2	+		5.4	+
Distributions on guaranteed preferred securities		—		—		—		8,070		8,070			8,070			NM			100.0	-
Other		92,086		36,870		27,662		70,062		98,058			52,289			149.8	+		12.0	+

Total all other expense		393,632		322,383		290,306		376,771		323,684			268,799			22.1	+		7.9	+

Total noninterest expense		$1,742,621		$1,626,894		$1,461,808		$1,643,964		$1,402,779			$1,188,709			7.1	+		8.0	+

NM - not meaningful Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses is the charge to earnings that management determines to be necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level reflecting management’s estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. An analytical model based on historical loss experience adjusted for current events, trends and economic conditions is used by management to determine the amount of provision to be recognized and to assess the adequacy of the loan loss allowance. The provision for loan losses increased 23 percent to $83.1 million in 2006 from $67.7 million in 2005. This increase primarily reflects continued growth of the commercial and construction loan portfolios, the increase in the level of impaired loans in the commercial and construction loan portfolios and an expectation of slowing economic growth. Included in the provision for 2005 is $3.8 million related to expected hurricane losses.

Going forward the level of provision for loan losses should fluctuate primarily with the strength or weakness of the economies of the markets where FHN does business over the long-run and will experience short-term fluctuations depending on the type and quantity of loan growth and impacts from asset quality movements.

INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate for 2006 was 26 percent compared to 31 percent in 2005, reflecting the incremental tax rate effect of the reduction in earnings below historical earnings levels. The effective tax rates for both 2006 and 2005 were favorably impacted by affordable housing tax credits and the tax effect of increases in the cash surrender value of life insurance. Also favorably impacting these tax rates were the settlement of certain prior years’ tax audits. See also Note 16 – Income Taxes for additional information.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On March 1, 2006, FHN sold its national merchant processing business for an after-tax gain of $209 million. This divestiture was accounted for as a discontinued operation, and accordingly, current and prior periods were adjusted to exclude the impact of merchant operations from the results of continuing operations.

CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
2006 earnings included a favorable impact of $1.3 million (net of tax) or $.01 per diluted share from the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle compared to an unfavorable impact of $3.1 million (net of tax) or $.03 per diluted share in 2005. FHN adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123-R) in 2006 and retroactively applied the provisions of the standard. Accordingly, results for periods prior to 2006 have been adjusted to reflect expensing of share-based compensation. A cumulative effect adjustment of $1.1 million was recognized, reflecting the change in accounting for share-based compensation expense based on estimated forfeitures rather than actual forfeitures. In 2006, FHN also adopted SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,” which allows servicing assets to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in current earnings. The adoption of this standard was applied on a prospective basis and resulted in a cumulative effect adjustment of $.2 million, representing the excess of the fair value of the servicing asset over the recorded value on January 1, 2006. In 2005, FHN adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (FIN 47) and recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to recognize estimated future costs of asbestos removal. (See also Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional detail.)

STATEMENT OF CONDITION REVIEW – 2006 COMPARED TO 2005

Total assets were $37.9 billion on December 31, 2006, compared with $36.6 billion on December 31, 2005. Average assets grew to $38.8 billion in 2006 from $36.6 billion in 2005. Growth in earning assets accounted for 94 percent of the increase in total average assets.

FHN adopted SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (SFAS No. 158), which requires the recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the statements of condition on December 31, 2006. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 158, unrecognized transition assets and obligations, unrecognized actuarial gains and losses, and unrecognized prior service costs and credits were recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income resulting in a reduction in equity of $76.7 million. (See Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits for further information.)

EARNING ASSETS
Earning assets consist of loans, loans held for sale, investment securities, trading securities and other earning assets. During 2006, earning assets averaged $34.0 billion compared with $31.9 billion for 2005. A more detailed discussion of the major line items follows.

Loans
Average loans increased 17 percent to $21.5 billion during 2006 as retail loans grew 16 percent and commercial loans grew 19 percent. Average loans were $18.3 billion during 2005. Average loans represented 63 percent of average earning assets in 2006 and 57 percent in 2005. Additional loan information is provided in Table 9 and Note 4 – Loans.

Table 9 - Average Loans


(Dollars in millions)	2006		Percent of Total			2006 Growth Rate			2005		Percent of Total			2005 Growth Rate			2004		Percent of Total

Commercial:
Commercial, financial and industrial		$ 6,674.9		31	%		11.6	%		$ 5,979.9		33	%		23.4	%		$ 4,845.6		31	%
Real estate commercial		1,223.2		6			9.6			1,116.4		6			16.4			959.3		6
Real estate construction		2,475.5		11			50.7			1,642.4		9			83.4			895.6		6

Total commercial		10,373.6		48			18.7			8,738.7		48			30.4			6,700.5		43

Retail:
Real estate residential		8,481.2		39			10.1			7,701.3		42			1.5			7,588.9		49
Real estate construction		2,034.9		10			36.7			1,488.9		8			108.4			714.6		5
Other retail		162.0		1			(1.8	)		165.0		1			(11.4	)		186.3		1
Credit card receivables		209.4		1			(13.1	)		240.8		1			(3.8	)		250.2		2
Real estate loans pledged against other collateralized
borrowings		243.1		1			NM			—		—			NM			—		—

Total retail		11,130.6		52			16.0			9,596.0		52			9.8			8,740.0		57

Total loans, net of unearned		$21,504.2		100	%		17.3	%		$18,334.7		100	%		18.7	%		$15,440.5		100	%

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Commercial loans consist of commercial, financial and industrial; commercial real estate; and commercial construction loans. Commercial, financial and industrial loans continued as the single largest loan category within commercial loans and represented 64 percent of the commercial loan portfolio in 2006 and 68 percent in 2005. Commercial, financial and industrial loans increased 12 percent in 2006, or $695.0 million, reflecting increased market share in Tennessee, expansion into other markets, the addition of middle market lending to the Atlanta, Dallas and Virginia markets and continued economic growth. Commercial construction loans grew 51 percent in 2006, or $833.1 million, primarily from growth in loans to single-family residential builders and commercial construction loans, reflecting the seasoning of the sale force and geographic diversification. Additional commercial loan information is provided in Table 10.

The retail loan portfolio consists of residential real estate (principally secured by first and/or second liens on residential property), other retail (automobile and other retail installment loans requiring periodic payments of principal and interest), credit card, and retail construction loans.

Residential real estate loans accounted for 78 percent of the retail loan portfolio in 2006 and 80 percent in 2005. The residential real estate loan portfolio (including real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings) grew 13 percent in 2006 to $8.7 billion compared to $7.7 billion for 2005, reflecting growing demand for second-lien mortgages. The retail real estate construction portfolio increased 37 percent or $546.0 million in 2006. Retail real estate construction loans are a one-time close product where First Horizon Home Loans provides construction financing and a permanent mortgage to individuals for the purpose of constructing a home. Upon completion of construction, the permanent mortgage is classified as held for sale and sold into the secondary market. The increase in these loans reflects favorable market conditions in the geographical areas where First Horizon Home Loans operates and further penetration of the customer base.

Table 10 - Contractual Maturities of Commercial Loans on December 31, 2006


(Dollars in thousands)	Within 1 Year		After 1 Year Within 5 Years		After 5 Years		Total

Commercial, financial and industrial		$ 4,152,418		$ 2,422,492		$ 626,099		$ 7,201,009
Real estate commercial		415,970		568,088		152,532		1,136,590
Real estate construction		2,075,577		677,881		—		2,753,458

Total commercial loans, net of unearned income		$ 6,643,965		$ 3,668,461		$ 778,631		$11,091,057

For maturities over one year:
Interest rates - floating				$ 2,261,760		$ 368,021		$ 2,629,781
Interest rates - fixed				1,406,701		410,610		1,817,311

Total				$ 3,668,461		$ 778,631		$ 4,447,092

Commercial loan growth should continue to be relatively strong due to national expansion and expected greater market demand for commercial and industrial loans. Year-over-year growth in retail loans will be primarily driven by the national sales platform.

Investment Securities
The investment portfolio of FHN consists principally of debt securities used as a source of income, liquidity and collateral for repurchase agreements or public fund deposits. Additionally, the investment portfolio is used as a tool to manage risk from movements in interest rates. The investment portfolio is classified into two categories: securities available for sale (AFS) and securities held to maturity (HTM). Table 11 shows information pertaining to the composition, yields and contractual maturities of the investment securities portfolio.

Investment securities averaged $3.5 billion in 2006 compared to $2.9 billion in 2005. This increase reflects the purchase of approximately $.9 billion U.S. government agency securities in third quarter 2006 to partially offset the decrease in loans held for sale and take advantage of higher yields. Investment securities represented 10 percent of earning assets in 2006 and 9 percent in 2005.

On December 31, 2006, AFS securities totaled $3.9 billion and consisted primarily of mortgage-backed securities (MBS), collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO), U.S. Treasury, U.S. government agencies, and equity securities. On December 31, 2006, these securities had $11.1 million of net unrealized gains that resulted in an increase in book equity of $6.8 million, net of $4.3 million of deferred income taxes. See Note 3 – Investment Securities for additional detail. On December 31, 2005, AFS securities totaled $2.9 billion and had $64.6 million of net unrealized losses that resulted in a decrease in book equity of $39.5 million, net of $25.1 million of deferred income taxes.

Table 11 - Contractual Maturities of Investment Securities on December 31, 2006 (Amortized Cost)


	Within 1 Year					After 1 Year Within 5 Years					After 5 Years Within 10 Years					After 10 Years

(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount			Yield

Securities held to maturity (HTM) :
States and municipalities*	$	49		13.54	%	$	220		7.10	%	$	—		—	%	$	—			—	%

Total	$	49		13.54	%	$	220		7.10	%	$	—		—	%	$	—			—	%

Securities available for sale (AFS):
Government agency issued MBS and CMO**	$	6,670		3.56	%	$	—		—	%	$	111,458		5.86	%	$	3,212,288			5.70	%
U. S. Treasuries		49,882		5.06			286		4.90			178		3.56			—			—
Other U.S. government agencies		6,879		3.48			—		—			239,187		5.34			—			—
States and municipalities*		—		—			—		—			1,500		6.83			—			—
Other		5,890		6.43			1,219		4.91			818		5.06			242,837	***		5.33

Total	$	69,321		4.88	%	$	1,505		4.91	%	$	353,141		5.51	%	$	3,455,125			5.67	%


*	Weighted average yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed by adjusting allowable tax-exempt income to a fully taxable equivalent basis.
**	Represents government agency issued mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations which, when adjusted for early paydowns, have an estimated average life of 4.9 years.
***	Represents equity securities with no stated maturity.

Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consist of the mortgage warehouse, HELOC, second-lien mortgages, student loans, small issuer trust preferred securities and credit card receivables. The mortgage warehouse accounts for the majority of loans held for sale. Loans held for sale represented 13 percent of total earning assets in 2006 compared with 19 percent in 2005. During 2006 loans held for sale averaged $4.3 billion, a decrease of 27 percent, or $1.6 billion from 2005. This decline is related to lower levels of HELOC and warehouse loans held for sale. Since mortgage warehouse loans and other loans held for sale are generally held in inventory for a short period of time, there may be significant differences between average and period-end balances. On December 31, 2006, loans held for sale were $2.9 billion, down from $4.4 billion at the end of 2005 principally due to lower levels of warehouse loans held for sale, HELOC and second-lien mortgages reflecting lower originations experienced in 2006.

Trading Securities / Other Earning Assets
Trading securities increased 14 percent to $2.8 billion in 2006 from $2.5 billion in 2005. Other earning assets, which are comprised of securities purchased under agreements to resell, federal funds sold and investments in bank time deposits, decreased 16 percent to $1.9 billion in 2006 from $2.3 billion in 2005 due to lower levels of securities purchased under agreements to resell in Capital Markets.

CORE DEPOSITS
During 2006, core deposits increased 7 percent, or $884.5 million, and averaged $13.0 billion. Interest-bearing core deposits increased 14 percent or $978.4 million to an average balance of $7.8 billion in 2006. Growth in interest-bearing core deposits is primarily due to growth in Retail/Commercial Banking deposits, reflecting market share gains in Tennessee, new market expansion and improved national cross-sell efforts. Noninterest-bearing core deposits, which averaged $5.2 billion in 2006, decreased 2 percent or $93.9 million primarily due to a decrease in mortgage custodial balances.

SHORT-TERM PURCHASED FUNDS / TERM BORROWINGS
Short-term purchased funds (certificates of deposit greater than $100,000, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, trading liabilities, commercial paper, and other short-term borrowings), averaged $16.4 billion for 2006, down 9 percent from $18.0 billion in 2005. Short-term purchased funds accounted for 48 percent of FHN’s funding (core deposits plus purchased funds and term borrowings) in 2006 and 55 percent in 2005. See Note 9 – Short-Term Borrowings for additional information.

Long-term borrowings include senior and subordinated borrowings and advances with original maturities greater than one year. Long-term borrowings increased 98 percent, or $2.5 billion, and averaged $5.1 billion in 2006. The increase in term borrowings was utilized to fund earning asset growth. Long-term borrowings on December 31, 2006, were $5.8 billion, an increase of 70 percent, or $2.4 billion from 2005 year-end. See Note 10 – Long-Term Debt for additional information.

INCOME STATEMENT REVIEW – 2005 COMPARED TO 2004

Earnings in 2005 were $424.7 million, a decrease of 5 percent from $445.7 million earned in 2004. Diluted earnings per common share decreased 5 percent to $3.28 in 2005 from $3.47 in 2004. Return on average assets was 1.16 percent in 2005 compared with 1.63 percent in 2004, and return on average shareholders’ equity was 19.5 percent in 2005 compared with 23.0 percent in 2004.

During 2005 net interest income increased 15 percent to $984.0 million from $856.3 million in 2004 as earning assets grew 35 percent to $32.0 billion and interest-bearing liabilities grew 40 percent to $27.4 billion in 2005. The consolidated net interest margin decreased to 3.08 percent for 2005 compared with 3.62 percent for 2004. This compression in the margin occurred as the net interest spread decreased to 2.64 from 3.33 percent in 2004 while earning assets and net interest income increased. The decline in the margin was attributable to two items, the acquisition of Spear, Leeds & Kellogg (SLK) and a flatter yield curve. The acquisition of SLK in first quarter 2005 increased the negative pressure on the corporate margin as Capital Markets’ balance sheet grew $3.5 billion. In addition, Mortgage Banking negatively impacted the corporate margin in 2005 as the flattening of the yield curve decreased spread on the warehouse by 133 basis points to 2.47 percent. See Table 1 for a detailed computation of the net interest margin for FHN.

Noninterest income contributed 57 percent to total revenue in 2005 compared to 60 percent in 2004. Capital markets noninterest income decreased to $353.0 million in 2005 from $376.5 million in 2004 due to a reduction in fixed income securities sales. Mortgage banking noninterest income increased 8 percent, or $34.8 million, as origination income increased $55.6 million, reflecting increased origination volume driven by growth in home-purchase originations as an expanded sales force led to market share gains. Total servicing income decreased $25.6 million. As the servicing portfolio grew 10 percent in 2005, total fees associated with mortgage servicing increased 22 percent or $49.9 million. However, servicing income was unfavorably impacted by a decline in net hedge gains of $41.1 million in 2005 as the continued flattening of the yield curve negatively impacted income from swaps and rising interest rates led to increased option expense. Additionally, the larger servicing portfolio and rising interest rates led to a 26 percent increase in capitalized MSR and a 24 percent increase in amortization expense. See Table 5 for detail of mortgage banking noninterest income. Noninterest income from deposit transactions and cash management increased to $156.2 million in 2005 from $148.5 million in 2004, reflecting deposit growth. Noninterest income from loans sales and securitizations increased to $47.6 million in 2005 from $23.1 million in 2004 as FHN continued to utilize loan sales and securitizations to manage liquidity and fund new loan growth. Net securities gains for 2004 included $18.7 million of gains from sales of investment securities, a $5.5 million gain resulting from the liquidation of a holding company investment, and a $3.9 million loss related to other-than-temporary impairment of an investment in Freddie Mac equity securities. Gains from divestitures totaled $7.0 million in 2005 from the sale of three financial centers in a non-strategic Tennessee market.

Total noninterest expense for 2005 increased 11 percent to $1,626.9 million from $1,461.8 million in 2004. Personnel expense increased 10 percent to $988.9 million from $899.8 million in 2004 primarily due to national expansion initiatives. All other expense categories increased 14 percent to $638.0 million from $562.0 million in 2004 including growth in occupancy expense, operations services, dividend on FTBNA perpetual preferred stock, legal and professional fees, contract employment, communications and courier expense, and advertising and public relations. These increases primarily resulted from activity associated with national expansion strategies and other growth initiatives.

The provision for loan losses increased 40 percent to $67.7 million in 2005 from $48.3 million in 2004 as the loan portfolio grew $2.9 billion. Included in the provision for 2005 was $3.8 million related to expected hurricane losses.

STATEMENT OF CONDITION REVIEW – 2005 COMPARED TO 2004

During 2005, earning assets averaged $32.0 billion compared with $23.7 billion for 2004. Average earning assets were 87 percent of total average assets in 2005 and 2004. Average loans increased 19 percent to $18.3 billion during 2005 as retail loans grew 10 percent and commercial loans grew 30 percent. Average loans represented 57 percent of average earning assets in 2005 compared to 65 percent in 2004.

Commercial, financial and industrial loans increased 23 percent, or $1.1 billion, in 2005 reflecting sales force expansion outside the Tennessee market and increased market share in Tennessee, which included the effect of industry consolidation within the Tennessee market. Commercial construction loans grew 83 percent in 2005 or $746.8 million, primarily from growth in loans to single-family residential builders made through First Horizon Home Loans, reflecting the demand for single-family housing and commercial real estate development and expansion of the sales force and geographic reach. Commercial real estate loans increased 16 percent or $157.1 million. The residential real estate loan portfolio grew 1 percent or $112.4 million in 2005. The retail real estate construction portfolio increased 108 percent or $774.3 million in 2005. Retail real estate residential construction loans are a one-time close product where First Horizon Home Loans provides construction financing and a permanent mortgage to individuals for the purpose of constructing a home. The increase in these loans reflected the favorable housing environment and expansion of the sales force and geographic reach.

Investment securities averaged $2.9 billion in 2005 and $2.4 billion in 2004. Investment securities represented 9 percent of earning assets in 2005 and 10 percent in 2004.

Loans held for sale represented 19 percent of total earning assets in 2005 compared with 17 percent in 2004. During 2005 loans held for sale averaged $6.0 billion, an increase of 45 percent, or $1.9 billion, from 2004. This growth was related to a higher level of mortgage originations and higher levels of HELOC and second-lien mortgages in 2005 as FHN continues to fund loan growth and maintain a stable liquidity position through loan sales and securitizations.

During 2005 core deposits increased 13 percent, or $1,359.3 million, and averaged $12.1 billion. Interest-bearing core deposits increased 13 percent or $769.5 million to an average balance of $6.9 million in 2005. Growth in interest-bearing core deposits was attributable to expansion strategies which emphasized a focus on convenient hours, free checking and targeted financial center expansions. Noninterest-bearing core deposits, which averaged $5.3 billion in 2005, increased 13 percent or $589.8 million primarily due to corporate deposits which included an increase in small business customers, larger balances in a cash management product and growth in mortgage escrow balances.

Short-term purchased funds averaged $18.0 billion for 2005, up 60 percent or $6.8 billion from the previous year. The increase in short-term purchased funds was used to fund earning asset growth of 35 percent or $8.2 billion in 2005. Term borrowings increased 14 percent or $312.1 million and averaged $2.6 billion in 2005. The increase in term borrowings was also utilized in funding earning asset growth. Term borrowings on December 31, 2005, were $3.4 billion, an increase of 31 percent, or $821.3 million from 2004 year-end.

CAPITAL

Management’s objectives are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risk inherent in FHN’s businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards, and to assure ready access to the capital markets. FHN’s capital position remained strong as shown in Table 12.

Average shareholders’ equity increased 11 percent in 2006 to $2.4 billion from $2.2 billion in 2005, which increased 12 percent from $1.9 billion in 2004. Shareholders’ equity was $2.5 billion at year-end 2006, up 5 percent from 2005, which increased 13 percent from year-end 2004. The increase in shareholders’ equity during 2006 and 2005 came principally from retention of net income after dividends and the effects of stock repurchases and option exercises. Pursuant to board authority, FHN may repurchase shares from time to time and will evaluate the level of capital and take action designed to generate or use capital, as appropriate, for the interests of the shareholders. In order to maintain FHN’s well-capitalized status while sustaining strong balance sheet growth, FTBNA issued

approximately $250 million of subordinated notes which qualify as Tier 2 capital under the risk-based capital guidelines in 2006. FHN also repurchased 4 million shares of its common stock in 2006 through an accelerated share repurchase program under an existing share repurchase authorization. This share repurchase program was concluded for an adjusted purchase price of $165.1 million. The share repurchase was funded with a portion of the proceeds from the merchant processing sale. The divestiture of merchant operations did not have a material impact on capital resources in 2006 and is not expected to have a material impact on future capital resources. In 2005, FHN raised approximately $295 million of additional capital and did not repurchase a significant number of shares. The Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity highlight the changes in equity since December 31, 2003.

Table 12 - Capital Ratios


	2006			2005			2004

Average shareholders’ equity to average assets		6.25	%		5.95	%		7.10	%
Period-end shareholders’ equity to assets		6.49			6.42			6.97
FHN’s tier 1 risk-based capital		8.87			8.67			8.76
FHN’s total risk-based capital		13.21			12.42			13.32
FHN’s leverage		6.94			6.76			7.27


Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Banking regulators define minimum capital ratios for bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries. Based on the capital rules and definitions prescribed by the banking regulators, should any depository institution’s capital ratios decline below predetermined levels, it would become subject to a series of increasingly restrictive regulatory actions. The system categorizes a depository institution’s capital position into one of five categories ranging from well-capitalized to critically under-capitalized. For an institution to qualify as well-capitalized, Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital and Leverage capital ratios must be at least 6 percent, 10 percent and 5 percent, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, FHN and FTBNA had sufficient capital to qualify as well-capitalized institutions as shown in Note 13 – Regulatory Capital.

Table 13 - Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


(Volume in thousands)	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs

2006
October 1 to October 31	—	$ —	—	30,498
November 1 to November 30	30	39.63	30	30,468
December 1 to December 31	47	40.50	47	30,421

Total	77	$ 40.16	77


Compensation Plan Programs:
-	A consolidated compensation plan share purchase program was approved on July 20, 2004, and was announced on August 6, 2004. This plan consolidated into a single share purchase program all of the previously authorized compensation plan share programs as well as the renewal of the authorization to purchase shares for use in connection with two compensation plans for which the share purchase authority had expired. The total amount originally authorized under this consolidated compensation plan share purchase program is 25.1 million shares. On April 24, 2006, an increase to the authority under this purchase program of 4.5 million shares was announced for a new total authorization of 29.6 million shares. The shares may be purchased over the option exercise period of the various compensation plans on or before December 31, 2023. Stock options granted after January 2, 2004, must be exercised no later than the tenth anniversary of the grant date. On December 31, 2006, the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the program was 28.8 million shares.

Other Programs:
-	A non-stock option plan-related authority was announced on October 18, 2000, authorizing the purchase of up to 9.5 million shares. On October 16, 2001, it was announced that FHN’s board of directors extended the expiration date of this program from June 30, 2002, until December 31, 2004. On October 19, 2004, the board of directors extended the authorization until December 31, 2007. On December 31, 2006, the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the program was 1.6 million shares.

On December 31, 2006, book value per common share was $19.61 compared to $18.46 for 2005 and $16.66 for 2004. Average shares for the three-year period were 124.5 million in 2006, 125.5 million in 2005 and 124.7 million in 2004. Period-end shares outstanding for this same three-year period were 124.9 million, 126.2 million and 123.5 million, respectively. FHN’s shares are traded on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol FHN. The sales price ranges, net income per share and dividends declared by quarter, for each of the last two years, are presented in Table 25.

RISK MANAGEMENT

FHN has an enterprise-wide approach to risk governance, measurement, management, and reporting including an economic capital allocation process that is tied to risk profiles used to measure risk-adjusted returns. The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee oversees risk management governance. Committee membership includes the CEO and other executive officers of FHN. The Executive Vice President (EVP) of Risk Management oversees reporting for the committee. Risk management objectives include evaluating risks inherent in business strategies, monitoring proper balance of risks and returns, and managing risks to minimize the probability of future negative outcomes. The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee oversees and receives regular reports from the Senior Credit Policy Committee, Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), Capital Management Committee, Regulatory Compliance Committee, and Operational Risk Committee. The Chief Credit Officer, EVP of Interest Rate Risk Management, Chief Financial Officer, EVP of Regulatory Risk Management, and EVP of Risk Management chair these committees, respectively. Reports regarding Credit, Asset/Liability Management, Market Risk, Capital Management, Regulatory Compliance, and Operational Risks are provided to the Credit Policy and Executive and/or Audit Committee of the Board and to the full Board.

Risk management practices include key elements such as independent checks and balances, formal authority limits, policies and procedures, and portfolio management all executed through experienced personnel. The internal audit department also evaluates risk management activities. These evaluations are reviewed with management and the Audit Committee, as appropriate.

INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in prevailing interest rates will adversely affect assets, liabilities, capital, income and/or expense at different times or in different amounts. ALCO, a committee consisting of senior management that meets regularly, is responsible for coordinating the financial management of interest rate risk. FHN primarily manages interest rate risk by structuring the balance sheet to attempt to maintain the desired level of associated earnings while operating within prudent risk limits and thereby preserving the value of FHN’s capital.

Net interest income and the financial condition of FHN are affected by changes in the level of market interest rates as the repricing characteristics of loans and other assets do not necessarily match those of deposits, other borrowings and capital. To the extent that earning assets reprice more quickly than liabilities, this position will benefit net interest income in a rising interest rate environment and will negatively impact net interest income in a declining interest rate environment. In the case of floating rate assets and liabilities with similar repricing frequencies, FHN may also be exposed to basis risk which results from changing spreads between earning and borrowing rates. Generally, when interest rates decline, Mortgage Banking faces increased prepayment risk associated with MSR.

FHN uses simulation analysis as its primary tool to evaluate interest rate risk exposure. This type of analysis computes net interest income at risk under a variety of market interest rate scenarios to dynamically identify interest rate risk exposures. This simulation, which considers forecasted balance sheet changes, prepayment speeds, deposit mix, pricing impacts, and other changes in the net interest spread, provides an estimate of the annual net interest income at risk for given changes in interest rates. The results help FHN develop strategies for managing exposure to interest rate risk. Like any forecasting technique, interest rate simulation modeling is based on a number of assumptions and judgments. In this case, the assumptions relate primarily to loan and deposit growth, asset and liability prepayments, interest rates, and on- and off-balance sheet management strategies. Management believes the assumptions used in its simulations are reasonable. Nevertheless, simulation modeling provides only a sophisticated estimate, not a precise calculation of exposure to changes in interest rates.

The simulation models used to analyze the retail/commercial bank’s net interest income create various at-risk scenarios looking at increases and/or decreases in interest rates from an instantaneous movement or a staggered movement over a certain time period. In addition, the risk of changes in the yield curve is estimated by flattening and steepening the yield curve to historical levels. Management reviews these different scenarios to determine alternative strategies and executes based on that evaluation. The models are continuously updated to incorporate management action. Any scenarios that indicate a net interest income at risk of three percent or more are presented to the Board quarterly. A 200 basis point immediate increase or decrease in interest rates (rate “shock”) over a one-year period is a key scenario analyzed. These hypothetical rate moves are used to simulate net interest income exposure to historically extreme movements in interest rates. The bank’s rate sensitivity position shows a risk to scenarios that project declining rates. This position is driven primarily by the impact of increased prepayments on loans and investment securities. Based on the rate sensitivity position on December 31, 2006, net interest income exposure over the next 12 months to a rate shock of minus 200 basis points is estimated to be approximately two percent of base net interest income. A rate shock of plus 200 basis points results in an unfavorable variance in net interest income of approximately one third of a percent. A 200 basis point immediate and parallel increase and decrease in interest rates are hypothetical rate scenarios. These scenarios are used as one estimate of risk, and do not necessarily represent management’s current view of future interest rates or market developments. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes and changes in market conditions, and management’s strategies, among other factors, including those presented in the Forward-Looking Statements section of this MD&A.

Other than the impact related to the immediate change in market value of balance sheet accounts, such as MSR, these simulation models and related hedging strategies exclude the dynamics related to how fee income and noninterest expense may be affected by actual changes in interest rates or expectations of changes. Mortgage banking revenue, which is generated from originating, selling and servicing residential mortgage loans, is highly sensitive to changes in interest rates due to the direct effect changes in interest rates have on loan demand. In general, low or declining interest rates typically lead to increased origination fees and profit from the sale of loans but potentially lower servicing-related income due to the impact of higher loan prepayments on the value of mortgage servicing assets. Conversely, high or rising interest rates typically reduce mortgage loan demand and hence income from originations and sales of loans while servicing-related income may rise due to lower prepayments. The earnings impact from originations and sales of loans on total earnings is more significant than servicing-related income. Net interest income earned on warehouse loans held for sale and on swaps and similar derivative instruments used to protect the value of MSR increases when the yield curve steepens and decreases when the yield curve flattens. The simulation models used to analyze the retail commercial bank’s net interest income exclude the potential impacts to mortgage banking’s net interest income. In addition, a flattening yield curve negatively impacts the demand for fixed income securities and, therefore, Capital Markets’ revenue.

To determine the amount of interest rate risk and exposure to changes in fair value of loan commitments, warehouse loans and MSR, mortgage banking uses multiple scenario rate shock analysis, including the magnitude and direction of interest rate changes, prepayment speeds, and other factors that could affect mortgage banking. In certain cases, derivative financial instruments are used to aid in managing the exposure of the balance sheet and related net interest income and noninterest income to changes in interest rates. As discussed in Critical Accounting Policies, derivative financial instruments are used by mortgage banking for two purposes. First, forward sales contracts and futures contracts are used to protect against changes in fair value of the pipeline and mortgage warehouse (refer to discussion of Pipeline and Warehouse under Critical Accounting Policies) from the time an interest rate is committed to the customer until the mortgage is sold into the secondary market due to increases in interest rates. Second, interest rate contracts are utilized to protect against MSR prepayment risk that generally accompanies declining interest rates. As interest rates fall, the value of MSR should decrease and the value of the servicing hedge should increase. The converse is also true. Prior to the January 1, 2006, adoption of SFAS No. 156, ineffectiveness in these hedging strategies (when changes in the value of the derivative instruments did not match changes in the value of the hedged portion of MSR for any given change in long-term interest rates) was reflected in noninterest income. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 156, mortgage servicing noninterest income reflects the change in fair value of the MSR asset combined with net economic hedging results.

Derivative instruments are also used to protect against the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of capital markets’ securities inventory due to changes in interest rates. FHN does not use derivative

instruments to protect against changes in fair value of loans or loans held for sale other than the mortgage pipeline and warehouse.

Management uses the results of interest rate exposure models to formulate strategies to improve balance sheet positioning, earnings, or both, within FHN’s interest rate risk, liquidity and capital guidelines.

Table 14 details FHN’s interest rate sensitivity profile on December 31, 2006, based on projected cash flows categorized by anticipated settlement date on capital markets trading securities and expected maturity dates on mortgage banking trading securities. Also provided are the average rates earned on these trading securities. Table 14 also provides both the notional and fair values of derivative financial instruments held for trading. The information provided in this section, including the discussion regarding simulation analysis and rate shock analysis, is forward-looking. Actual results could differ because of interest rate movements, the ability of management to execute its business plans and other factors, including those presented in the Forward-Looking Statements section of this MD&A.

Table 14 — Risk Sensitivity Analysis
*Held for Trading*															Fair
( Dollars in millions )	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012	+	Total		Value

Assets:
Trading securities	$1,905		—		—		—		—		$ 326		$2,231		$2,231
Average interest rate	5.60	%	—		—		—		—		11.55	%	6.47	%

Interest Rate Derivatives (notional value):
*Capital Markets:*
Forward contracts:
Commitments to buy	$1,174		—		—		—		—		—		$1,174		$ 1
Weighted average settlement price	98.50	%	—		—		—		—		—		98.50	%
Commitments to sell	$1,488		—		—		—		—		—		$1,488		$ (2	)
Weighted average settlement price	98.69	%	—		—		—		—		—		98.69	%
Caps purchased	—		$ 20		$ 10		—		—		—		$ 30		*
Weighted average strike price	—		4.50	%	5.75	%	—		—		—		4.92	%
Caps written	—		$(20	)	$(10	)	—		—		—		$ (30	)	*
Weighted average strike price	—		4.50	%	5.75	%	—		—		—		4.92	%
Floors purchased	—		—		$ 80		$ 60		$ 200		$ 10		$ 350		$ 2
Weighted average strike price	—		—		6.54	%	6.17	%	6.65	%	5.50	%	6.51	%
Floors written	—		—		$ (80	)	$(60	)	$(200	)	$ (10	)	$ (350	)	$ (2	)
Weighted average strike price	—		—		6.54	%	6.17	%	6.65	%	5.50	%	6.51	%
Swap contracts	$ 25		$ 4		—		$ 2		$ 15		$ 22		$ 68		*
Average pay rate (fixed)	6.88	%	3.27	%	—		9.74	%	5.13	%	5.42	%	5.86	%
Average receive rate (floating)	8.62	%	5.07	%	—		7.95	%	5.36	%	5.32	%	6.59	%
Swap contracts	—		$ 25		$ 390		—		$ 70		—		$ 485		*
Average pay rate (floating)	—		8.25	%	8.10	%	—		8.25	%	—		8.13	%
Average receive rate (fixed)	—		5.22	%	7.87	%	—		7.80	%	—		7.72	%
Swap contracts	$ (25	)	$ (4	)	—		$ (2	)	$ (15	)	$ (22	)	$ (68	)	*
Average pay rate (floating)	8.62	%	5.07	%	—		7.95	%	5.36	%	5.32	%	6.59	%
Average receive rate (fixed)	6.88	%	3.27	%	—		9.74	%	5.13	%	5.42	%	5.86	%
Swap contracts	—		$(25	)	$(390	)	—		$ (70	)	—		$ (485	)	*
Average pay rate (fixed)	—		5.22	%	7.87	%	—		7.80	%	—		7.72	%
Average receive rate (floating)	—		8.25	%	8.10	%	—		8.25	%	—		8.13	%
Future contracts:
Commitments to sell	$ 384		—		—		—		—		—		$ 384		$ 1
Weighted average settlement price	97.80	%	—		—		—		—		—		97.80	%

* Amount is less than $500,000

LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
ALCO focuses on being able to fund assets with liabilities of the appropriate duration, as well as the risk of not being able to meet unexpected cash needs. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the continuous availability of funds to meet the demands of depositors, other creditors and borrowers, and the requirements of ongoing operations. This objective is met by maintaining liquid assets in the form of trading securities and securities available for sale, maintaining sufficient unused borrowing capacity in the national money markets,

growing core deposits, and the repayment of loans and the capability to sell or securitize loans. ALCO is responsible for managing these needs by taking into account the marketability of assets; the sources, stability and availability of funding; and the level of unfunded commitments. See Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements for additional information. Funds are available from a number of sources, including core deposits, the securities available for sale portfolio, the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), the Federal Reserve Banks, access to capital markets through issuance of senior or subordinated bank notes and institutional certificates of deposit, availability to the overnight and term Federal Funds markets, access to retail brokered certificates of deposit, dealer and commercial customer repurchase agreements, and through the sale or securitization of loans.

Core deposits are a significant source of funding and have been a stable source of liquidity for banks. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures these deposits to the extent authorized by law. For 2006, the total loans, excluding loans held for sale and real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings, to core deposits ratio was 163 percent compared with 151 percent and 143 percent in 2005 and 2004, respectively. As loan growth currently exceeds core deposit growth, alternative sources of funding loan growth may be necessary in order to maintain an adequate liquidity position. One means of maintaining a stable liquidity position is to sell loans either through whole-loan sales or loan securitizations. During 2006, FHN sold loans through on-balance sheet securitizations structured as financings for accounting purposes. FHN periodically evaluates its liquidity position in conjunction with determining its ability and intent to hold loans for the foreseeable future.

In February 2005, FTBNA established a bank note program providing additional liquidity of $5.0 billion. This bank note program provides FTBNA with a facility under which it may continuously issue and offer short- and medium-term unsecured notes. On December 31, 2006, $2.4 billion was available under existing conditions through the bank note program as a funding source.

FHN and FTBNA have the ability to generate liquidity by issuing preferred equity or incurring other debt. Liquidity has been obtained through FTBNA’s issuance of approximately $250 million of subordinated notes in 2006. In addition, FTBNA’s issued 300,000 shares of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock which provided approximately $295 million capital in 2005. In addition, liquidity has been obtained through issuance of $300 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in FHN’s junior subordinated debentures through two Delaware business trusts, wholly owned by FHN, See Note 10 – Long-Term Debt, Note 11 – Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in First Horizon’s Junior Subordinated Debentures and Note 12 – Preferred Stock of Subsidiary for additional information. FHN also evaluates alternative sources of funding, including loan sales, securitizations, syndications, and FHLB borrowings in its management of liquidity.

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows provide information on cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for each of the three years ended December 31, 2006. Net cash provided by operating activities was the primary contributor of positive cash flows during 2006, principally due to a decline in loans held for sale reflecting the contraction in origination activities. In addition, cash provided by financing activities contributed to positive cash flows in 2006 as an increase in short-term borrowings and the issuance of long-term debt outpaced a decline in deposits that reflects a diminished dependence on brokered deposits. Net cash used by investing activities resulted in a decrease in cash and cash equivalents for 2006, reflecting growth in earning assets, including loans and investment securities. In 2005 and 2004, net cash provided by financing activities was the primary contributor to an increase in cash and cash equivalents, mainly resulting from growth in deposits and long-term debt. Deposit growth was utilized to meet increased liquidity needs related to loan growth as reflected in negative cash flows from investing activities during both periods. The issuance of term borrowings is an essential source of cash flows, and long-term borrowings were also utilized to better match the increased liquidity needs related to loan growth during both 2005 and 2004. Additionally, an increase in short-term borrowings provided positive cash flows from financing activities in 2005. In 2004, cash flows from operating activities were negative primarily due to funding increased levels of HELOC held for sale and growth in MSR and other retained interests resulting from securitization activities. Earnings represent a significant source of liquidity, consistently providing positive cash flows in each of the three years.

Parent company liquidity is maintained by cash flows stemming from dividends and interest payments collected from subsidiaries, which represent the primary source of funds to pay dividends to shareholders and interest to debt holders. The amount of dividends from FTBNA is subject to certain regulatory restrictions that are described in Note 18 – Restrictions, Contingencies and Other Disclosures. The parent company statements are presented in

Note 26 – Parent Company Financial Information. The parent company also has the ability to enhance its liquidity position by raising equity or incurring debt. In addition, $50 million of borrowings under unsecured lines of credit from non-affiliated banks were available to the parent company to provide for general liquidity needs.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Contractual Obligations
First Horizon Home Loans originates conventional conforming and federally insured single-family residential mortgage loans. Likewise, FTN Financial Capital Assets Corporation purchases the same types of loans from customers. Substantially all of these mortgage loans are exchanged for securities, which are issued through investors, including government sponsored enterprises (GSE), such as Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) for federally insured loans and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) for conventional loans, and then sold in the secondary markets. Each of the GSE has specific guidelines and criteria for sellers and servicers of loans backing their respective securities. Many private investors are also active in the secondary market as issuers and investors. The risk of credit loss with regard to the principal amount of the loans sold is generally transferred to investors upon sale to the secondary market. To the extent that transferred loans are subsequently determined not to meet the agreed upon qualifications or criteria, the purchaser has the right to return those loans to FHN. In addition, certain mortgage loans are sold to investors with limited or full recourse in the event of mortgage foreclosure (refer to discussion of foreclosure reserves under Critical Accounting Policies). After sale, these loans are not reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. See also Note 18 - Restrictions, Contingencies and Other Disclosures.

FHN’s use of government agencies as an efficient outlet for mortgage loan production is an essential source of liquidity for FHN and other participants in the housing industry. During 2006 and 2005, approximately $13.8 billion and $16.6 billion, respectively, of conventional and federally insured mortgage loans were securitized and sold by First Horizon Home Loans through these investors.

Certain of FHN’s originated loans, including non-conforming first-lien mortgages, second-lien mortgages and HELOC originated primarily through FTBNA, do not conform to the requirements for sale or securitization through government agencies. FHN pools and securitizes these non-conforming loans in proprietary transactions. After securitization and sale, these loans are not reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, except as described hereafter (see Credit Risk Management – Mortgage Banking). These transactions, which are conducted through single-purpose business trusts, are an efficient way for FHN and other participants in the housing industry to monetize these assets. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, the outstanding principal amount of loans in these off-balance sheet business trusts was $24.5 billion and $20.0 billion, respectively. Given the significance of FHN’s origination of non-conforming loans, the use of single-purpose business trusts to securitize these loans is an important source of liquidity to FHN. See Note 24 – Securitizations for additional information.

Pension obligations are funded by FHN to provide current and future benefit to participants in FHN’s noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan. On September 30, 2006, the annual measurement date, pension obligations were $407.0 million with $421.4 million of assets in the trust to fund those obligations. FHN made a contribution of $37 million to the pension plan in fourth quarter 2006 and made an additional contribution of $37 million in first quarter 2007. Both of these contributions were attributable to the 2006 plan year. FHN expects to make no additional contributions to the pension plan in 2007. The discount rate for 2006 of 6.06 percent for the qualified pension plan and 5.88 percent for the nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan was determined by using a hypothetical AA yield curve represented by a series of annualized individual discount rates from one-half to thirty years. The discount rates for the pension and nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plans are selected based on data specific to FHN’s plans and employee population. See Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits for additional information.

FHN has various other financial obligations, which may require future cash payments. Table 15 sets forth contractual obligations representing required and potential cash outflows as of December 31, 2006. Purchase obligations represent obligations under agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on FHN and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions, and the approximate timing of the transaction. In addition, FHN enters into commitments to extend credit to borrowers, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit. These commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these

commitments often expire without being drawn upon. See Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements for additional information.

Table 15 - Contractual Obligations


	Payments due by period

(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years		After 5 years		Total

Contractual obligations:
Time deposit maturities*	$	7,507,176	$	1,446,331	$	206,937	$	281,235	$	9,441,679
Long-term debt**		150,341		3,052,290		705,282		1,951,432		5,859,345
Annual rental commitments under noncancelable leases***		69,263		89,319		40,982		53,075		252,639
Purchase obligations		97,863		89,163		13,948		17,230		218,204

Total contractual obligations	$	7,824,643	$	4,677,103	$	967,149	$	2,302,972	$	15,771,867


*	See Note 8 - Time Deposit Maturities for further details.
**	See Note 10 - Long-Term Debt for further details.
***	See Note 5 - Premises, Equipment and Leases for further details.

Credit Ratings
Maintaining adequate credit ratings on debt issues is critical to liquidity because it affects the ability of FHN to attract funds from various sources, such as brokered deposits or wholesale borrowings of which FHN had $5.3 billion and $10.1 billion on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, on a cost-competitive basis (see also Liquidity Management). The various credit ratings are detailed in Table 16. The availability of funds other than core deposits is also dependent upon marketplace perceptions of the financial soundness of FHN, which include such issues as capital levels, asset quality and reputation. The availability of core deposit funding is dependent upon federal deposit insurance, which can be removed only in extraordinary circumstances, but may also be influenced to some extent by the same factors that affect other funding sources.

Table 16 - Credit Ratings


	Standard & Poor’s	Moody’s	Fitch

First Horizon National Corporation
Overall credit rating	A-/Negative	A2/Negative	A/Negative/F1
Subordinated debt	BBB+	A3	A-
Capital securities*	BBB	A3	A-

First Tennessee Bank National Association
Overall credit rating	A/Negative/A-1	A1/Negative/P-1	A/Negative/F1
Non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock	BBB+	A3	A-
Long-term/short-term deposits	A/A-1	A1/P-1	A+/F1
Other long-term/short-term funding**	A/A-1	A1/P-1	A/F1
Subordinated debt	A-	A2	A-

FT Real Estate Securities Company, Inc.
Preferred stock	BBB+	A3


*	Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in First Horizon’s junior subordinated debentures issued through a wholly-owned unconsolidated business trust.
**	Other funding includes senior bank notes and extendible notes.
A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time and should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Capital markets buys and sells various types of securities for its customers. When these securities settle on a delayed basis, they are considered forward contracts. Inventory positions are limited to the procurement of securities solely for distribution to customers by the sales staff, and ALCO policies and guidelines have been established with the objective of limiting the risk in managing this inventory.

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The capital management objectives of FHN are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks inherent in FHN’s businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards and to assure ready access to the capital markets. Management has a Capital Management committee that is responsible for capital management oversight and provides a forum for addressing management issues related to capital adequacy. The committee reviews sources and uses of capital, key capital ratios, segment economic capital allocation methodologies, and other factors in monitoring and managing current capital levels, as well as potential future sources and uses of capital. The committee also recommends capital management policies, which are submitted for approval to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee and the Board.

OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events. This risk is inherent in all businesses. Management, measurement, and reporting of operational risk are overseen by the Operational Risk Committee, which is chaired by the EVP of Risk Management. Key representatives from the business segments, legal, shared services, risk management, and insurance are represented on the committee. Subcommittees manage and report on business continuity planning, information technology, data security, insurance, compliance, records management, product and system development, customer complaint, and reputation risks. Summary reports of the committee’s activities and decisions are provided to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee. Emphasis is dedicated to refinement of processes and tools to aid in measuring and managing material operational risks and providing for a culture of awareness and accountability.

COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss, or loss to reputation as a result of failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory organization standards, and codes of conduct applicable to banking activities. Management, measurement, and reporting of compliance risk are overseen by the Regulatory Compliance Committee, which is chaired by the EVP of Regulatory Risk Management. Key executives from the business segments, legal, risk management, and shared services are represented on the committee. Summary reports of the committee’s activities and decisions are provided to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee, and to the Audit Committee of the Board, as applicable. Reports include the status of regulatory activities, internal compliance program initiatives, and evaluation of emerging compliance risk areas.

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in a borrower’s ability to meet its financial obligations under agreed upon terms. FHN is subject to credit risk in lending, trading, investing, liquidity/funding and asset management activities. The nature and amount of credit risk depend on the types of transactions, the structure of those transactions and the parties involved. In general, credit risk is incidental to trading, investing, liquidity/funding and asset management activities, while it is central to the profit strategy in lending. As a result, the majority of credit risk is associated with lending activities.

FHN has processes and management committees in place that are designed to assess and monitor credit risks. Management’s Asset Quality Committee has the responsibility to evaluate its assessment of current asset quality for each lending product. In addition, the Asset Quality Committee evaluates the projected changes in classified loans, non-performing assets and charge-offs. A primary objective of this committee is to provide information about changing trends in asset quality by region or loan product, and to provide to senior management a current assessment of credit quality as part of the estimation process for determining the allowance for loan losses. The

Senior Credit Watch Committee has primary responsibility to enforce proper loan risk grading, to identify credit problems, and to monitor actions to rehabilitate certain credits. Management also has a Senior Credit Policy Committee that is responsible for enterprise-wide credit risk oversight and provides a forum for addressing credit management issues. The committee also recommends credit policies, which are submitted for approval to the Credit Policy and Executive Committee of the Board, and approves underwriting guidelines to manage the level and composition of credit risk in its loan portfolio and review performance relative to these policies. In addition, the Financial Counterparty Credit Committee, composed of senior managers, assesses the credit risk of financial counterparties and sets limits for exposure based upon the credit quality of the counterparty. FHN’s goal is to manage risk and price loan products based on risk management decisions and strategies. Management strives to identify potential problem loans and nonperforming loans early enough to correct the deficiencies. It is management’s objective that both charge-offs and asset write-downs are recorded promptly, based on management’s assessments of current collateral values and the borrower’s ability to repay.

FHN has a significant concentration in loans secured by real estate which is geographically diversified nationwide. In 2006, 67 percent of total loans are secured by real estate compared to 65 percent in 2005 (see Table 9). Three lending products have contributed to this level of real estate lending including significant levels of retail residential real estate, which comprise 40 percent of total loans. The risk profile of the retail residential real estate portfolio remains stable reflecting a significant concentration of high credit score products. Also contributing to the level of real estate lending are commercial construction loans which include loans to single-family builders and comprise 11 percent of total loans and retail construction loans, First Horizon Home Loans’ one-time close product, which comprise 10 percent of total loans. FHN’s other commercial real estate lending, excluding single-family builders is well-diversified by product type and industry. On December 31, 2006, FHN did not have any concentrations of 10 percent or more of total commercial, financial and industrial loans in any single industry.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Charge-offs
Management’s policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb estimated probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries and is decreased by charged-off loans. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is analyzed quarterly. The Chief Credit Officer has the responsibility for performing a comprehensive review of the allowance for loan losses and reviewing that analysis with the Credit Policy and Executive Committee of the Board each quarterly reporting period. An analytical model, based on historical loss experience adjusted for current events, trends and economic conditions, is used to assess the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. This methodology determines an estimated loss percentage (reserve rate), which is applied against the balance of loans in each segment of the loan portfolio at the evaluation date. The nature of the process by which FHN determines the appropriate allowance for loan losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. After review of all relevant factors, management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate and reflects its best estimate of probable incurred losses.

The total allowance for loan losses increased to $216.3 million on December 31, 2006, from $189.7 million at year-end 2005, which was up $31.5 million since year-end 2004. Period-end loans increased 7 percent in 2006 after increasing 25 percent in 2005. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans, net of unearned income, was .98 percent on December 31, 2006, compared to .92 percent on December 31, 2005, primarily reflecting continued growth of the commercial and construction loan portfolios, the increase in the level of impaired loans in the commercial and construction loan portfolios and an expectation of slowing economic growth. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans was .96 percent on December 31, 2004.

Table 18 summarizes by category loans charged-off and recoveries of loans previously charged-off. This table also shows the additions to the reserve through provision. Table 17 shows net charge-off ratios. Net charge-offs increased to $55.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, up from $37.5 million in 2005 and $42.1 million in 2004. The increase in the 2006 level of net charge-offs was primarily due to increased net charge-offs in the commercial loan portfolio which grew 19 percent, or $1.6 billion during this period. Total commercial loan net charge-offs were $25.3 million in 2006 compared to $11.6 million in 2005. This increase is primarily due to several commercial credits in the retail commercial bank’s traditional lending markets. Residential real estate loan net charge-offs increased to $19.1 million in 2006 from $13.4 million in 2005 as this loan portfolio increased 13 percent, or $1.0 billion. Credit card receivables net charge-offs dropped to $5.1 million in 2006 from $9.7 million in 2005, primarily due to management’s focus on developing a relationship-based portfolio.

Table 17 - Net Charge-off Ratios*


	2006			2005			2004

Commercial		.24	%		.13	%		.18	%
Retail real estate		.20			.15			.20
Other retail		2.26			1.46			1.55
Credit card receivables		2.43			4.03			4.25
Total net charge-offs		.26			.20			.27


*	Net charge-off ratios are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income.
Table 9 provides information on the relative size of each loan portfolio.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Going forward, asset quality indicators should reflect the relative strength of the economy and the early recognition and resolution of asset quality issues. In addition, asset quality ratios could be affected by balance sheet strategies and shifts in loan mix to and from products with different risk/return profiles. Asset quality indicators are expected to remain solid; however, an increase from the historically low levels experienced in recent periods is expected. Actual results could differ because of several factors, including those presented in the Forward-Looking Statements section of this MD&A discussion.

Table 18 - Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002			2001

Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	189,705		$	158,159		$	160,333		$	144,298		$	150,614		$	139,210
Provision for loan losses		83,129			67,678			48,348			86,698			92,184			93,220
Loans transferred to held for sale		—			—			(8,382	)		—			—			—
Acquisitions/(divestitures), net		(1,470	)		1,386			—			(2,652	)		—			(1,337	)
Charge-offs:
Commercial:
Commercial, financial and industrial		28,095			12,789			11,925			12,460			37,241			22,596
Real estate commercial		2,070			498			2,690			3,067			2,966			4,156
Real estate construction		115			2,805			779			7,642			3,367			968
Retail:
Real estate residential		23,405			18,744			21,271			35,809			36,726			30,532
Real estate construction		1,962			374			—			—			—			—
Other retail		6,753			6,101			7,094			9,920			19,979			20,603
Credit card receivables		6,226			10,839			12,870			13,538			12,862			13,369

Total charge-offs		68,626			52,150			56,629			82,436			113,141			92,224

Recoveries:
Commercial:
Commercial, financial and industrial		4,725			3,328			3,473			2,438			2,136			1,991
Real estate commercial		296			1,173			51			166			41			280
Real estate construction		—			—			10			1			—			—
Retail:
Real estate residential		4,307			5,300			4,517			4,820			4,693			2,788
Other retail		3,090			3,697			4,211			5,653			6,419			4,953
Credit card receivables		1,129			1,134			2,227			1,347			1,352			1,733

Total recoveries		13,547			14,632			14,489			14,425			14,641			11,745

Net charge-offs		55,079			37,518			42,140			68,011			98,500			80,479

Ending balance	$	216,285		$	189,705		$	158,159		$	160,333		$	144,298		$	150,614

Reserve for off-balance sheet commitments	$	9,378		$	10,650		$	7,904		$	7,804		$	5,368		$	4,759
Total of allowance for loan losses and reserve for off-balance sheet commitments	$	225,663		$	200,355		$	166,063		$	168,137		$	149,666		$	155,373

Loans and commitments:
Period end loans, net of unearned	$	22,104,905		$	20,611,998		$	16,441,928		$	14,021,318		$	11,369,759		$	10,291,954
Insured retail residential and construction loans*		729,842			826,904			665,909			862,675			785,270			—

Loans excluding insured loans	$	21,375,063		$	19,785,094		$	15,776,019		$	13,158,643		$	10,584,489		$	10,291,954

Off-balance sheet commitments**	$	7,587,028		$	9,090,618		$	6,226,245		$	5,464,097		$	3,398,534		$	2,895,681

Average loans, net of unearned	$	21,504,175		$	18,334,684		$	15,440,501		$	12,679,804		$	10,645,590		$	10,118,782

Ratios:*
Allowance to loans		.98	%		.92	%		.96	%		1.14	%		1.27	%		1.46	%
Allowance to loans excluding insured loans		1.01			.96			1.00			1.22			1.36			1.46
Allowance to net charge-offs		3.93	x		5.06	x		3.75	x		2.36	x		1.46	x		1.87	x
Net charge-offs to average loans		.26			.20			.27			.54			.93			.80


*	Whole-loan insurance is obtained on certain retail residential and construction loans. Insuring these loans absorbs credit risk and results in lower allowance for loan losses.
**	Amount of off-balance sheet commitments for which a reserve has been provided. See Note 25 - Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements for further details on off-balance sheet commitments.
***	Net of unearned income.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Components of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is composed of the following components: reserves for individually impaired commercial loans, reserves for commercial loans evaluated based on pools of credit graded loans, and reserves for pools of smaller-balance homogeneous retail and commercial loans. Reserves for individually impaired commercial loans are computed in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” and are based on either the estimated collateral value less selling costs (if the loan is a collateral dependent loan), or the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Reserves for commercial loans evaluated based on pools of credit graded loans and reserves for pools of smaller-balance homogeneous retail and commercial loans are determined in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” The reserve factors applied to these pools are an estimate of probable incurred losses based on management’s evaluation of historical losses from loans with similar characteristics, adjusted for current economic factors and trends. Table 19 gives a breakdown of the allowance allocation by major loan types and commercial loan grades on December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005.

To assess the quality of individual commercial loans, all commercial loans are internally assigned a credit grade. During 2006, a new credit grading system was implemented that assigns credit grades ranging from grades 1 to 16. However, the allowance for loan losses continues to be based on historical losses which had assigned grades of 1 to 10. Therefore, to maintain the integrity and accuracy of the allowance methodology, at each reporting period we back-convert the new assigned loan grades to the old grades for proper assignment of reserves. The credit grading system is intended to identify and measure the credit quality of lending relationships by analyzing the migration of loans between grading categories. It is also integral to the estimation methodology utilized in determining the allowance for loan losses since an allowance is established for pools of commercial loans based on the credit grade assigned. The appropriate relationship manager performs the process of classifying commercial loans into the appropriate credit grades initially as a component of the approval of the loan and has responsibility for insuring that the loan is properly graded throughout the life of the loan. The proper loan grade for all commercial loans in excess of $1 million is confirmed by a senior credit officer in the approval process. To determine the most appropriate credit grade for each loan, based on the size of the loan, credit officers examine and consider both financial and non-financial data as discussed in the credit grade definitions disclosed in Table 19. Loan grades are frequently reviewed by commercial loan review to determine if any changes in the circumstances of the loan require a different risk grade.

A reserve rate is established for each loan grade based on a historical three-year moving average of actual charge-offs. The reserve rate is then adjusted for current events, trends, and economic conditions that affect the asset quality of the loan portfolio. Some of the factors considered in making these adjustments include: levels of and trends in delinquencies; classified loans and nonaccrual loans; trends in outstandings and maturities; effects of changes in lending policies and underwriting guidelines; introduction of new loan products with different risk characteristics; experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff; migration trends of loan grades; and charge-off trends that may skew the historical three-year moving average. Finally, the reserve rates for each loan grade are reviewed quarterly to reflect local, regional and national economic trends; concentrations of cyclical industries; and the economic prospects for industry concentrations. To supplement management’s process in setting these additional adjustments, an economic model is used that evaluates the correlation between historical charge-offs and a number of state and national economic indicators. Also, all classified loans $1 million and greater are reviewed individually in accordance with SFAS No. 114, and a specific reserve is set based on the exposure (the difference between the outstanding loan amount and either the present value of expected future cash flows or the estimated net realizable value of the collateral) and the probability of loss.

Table 19 - Loans and Foreclosed Real Estate on December 31


	2006							2005

(Dollars in millions)	Commercial	Construction and Development	Commercial Real Estate	Total	% of Total		Allowance for Loan Losses	Total	% of Total		Allowance for Loan Losses

Internal grades:
1	$ 153	$ 10	$ —	$ 163	1	%	$ —	$ 301	2	%	$ 1
2	282	1	6	289	1		1	515	3		3
3	584	30	10	624	3		7	825	4		9
4	4,858	1,453	1,006	7,317	33		87	5,979	29		65
5	1,142	1,150	103	2,395	11		31	2,035	10		29
6	83	66	8	157	1		7	91	—		4
7	10	25	—	35	—		3	52	—		5
8, 9, 10 (Classifieds)	53	7	1	61	—		8	70	—		10

	7,165	2,742	1,134	11,041	50		144	9,868	48		126
Impaired loans:
Contractually past due	37	11	3	51	—		15	23	—		6
Contractually current	—	—	—	—	—		—	9	—		3

Total commercial and commercial real estate loans	7,202	2,753	1,137	11,092	50		159	9,900	48		135

Retail:
Real estate residential*				8,564	39		39	8,368	41		37
Real estate construction				2,085	9		7	1,925	9		4
Other retail				161	1		4	168	1		4
Credit card receivables				203	1		7	251	1		10

Total retail loans				11,013	50		57	10,712	52		55

Total loans				$22,105	100	%	$ 216	$20,612	100	%	$190

Foreclosed real estate:
Commercial	$ 14	$ —	$ 4	$ 18				$ 14
Retail				13				5
Mortgage banking				14				8
Foreclosed real estate from GNMA loans**				18				—

Total foreclosed real estate				$ 63				$ 27

* Includes real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings.
** Prior to 2006 properties acquired by foreclosure through GNMA’s repurchase program were classified as receivables in Other Assets on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
Loans are expressed net of unearned income. All data is based on internal loan classifications. Definitions of each credit grade are provided below:
Grade 1:	Firmly established, stable companies with excellent earnings, liquidity, and capital. Possess many of the same characteristics as Standard & Poor’s (S&P) AA rated companies.
Grade 2:	Well-established, stable companies with good to very good earnings, liquidity, and capital. Possess many of the same characteristics as S&P A rated companies.
Grade 3:	Reasonably well-established, stable companies with above average to good earnings, liquidity, and capital and with consistent, positive trends relative to industry norms.
Grade 4:	Reasonably well-established, stable companies with average earnings, liquidity, and capital.
Grade 5:	New and established companies with some potential weakness. Capital considered less than average and history of average to below average earnings without consistent positive trends. Overall acceptable credits with minor weaknesses which warrant additional servicing.
Grade 6:	Financial condition adversely affected by temporary lack of earnings or liquidity or changes in the operating environment. An action plan is required to rehabilitate the credit or have it refinanced elsewhere.
Grade 7:	Significant developing weaknesses or adverse trends in earnings, liquidity, capital, or operating environment. Limited alternate financing is available.
Grade 8:	Significantly higher than normal probability that: (1) legal action will be required; (2) liquidation of collateral will be required; (3) there will be a loss; or all three will occur. This grade is believed to be substantially equivalent to the regulators’ classification of substandard.
Grade 9:	Excessive degree of risk. Financial and management deficiencies are well-defined and make the obligor’s ability to repay from anticipated sources under existing terms and conditions uncertain. Collateral shortfall and/or undeterminable collateral values exist. Timing and amount of loss are uncertain. This grade is believed to be substantially equivalent to the regulators’ classification of doubtful.
Grade 10:	Borrowers are deemed incapable of repayment and debt is deemed uncollectible. Loans should no longer be carried as an active bank asset. This grade is believed to be substantially equivalent to the regulators’ classification of loss.
Impaired:	A loan for which it is probable that all amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, will not be collected and the loan is placed on non-accrual status. Reserves for impaired loans are based on the value of the collateral or the cash flow of the entity compared to the outstanding balance.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Table 20 shows the reserve rates (percentage of allowance for loan losses to outstanding balances) by loan category. The average reserve rate for all commercial loans has remained relatively stable over the past three years at 1.30 percent in 2006, 1.28 percent in 2005, and 1.30 percent in 2004.

Table 20 - Average Reserve Rates


	2006			Loans % of Total		2005			Loans % of Total		2004			Loans % of Total		2003			Loans % of Total		2002			Loans % of Total

Commercial, commercial real estate and commercial construction*		1.30	%		50.0		1.28	%		47.9		1.30	%		46.8		1.49	%		43.7		1.29	%		49.9
Impaired		29.41			.2		28.13			.2		28.57			.2		29.41			.2		30.61			.5
Retail real estate including loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings		.43			48.2		.40			49.9		.40			50.5		.56			52.6		.77			44.7
Other retail		2.48			.7		2.38			.8		2.96			1.0		2.35			1.5		1.05			2.5
Credit card receivables		3.45			.9		3.98			1.2		4.02			1.5		4.76			2.0		5.13			2.4

*	Excludes impaired loans.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

The allowance for loan losses for smaller-balance homogenous loans (retail loans) is determined based on pools of similar loan types that have similar credit risk characteristics, which is consistent with industry practice. FHN manages retail loan credit risk on a portfolio basis. Reserve rates are established for each segment of the retail loan portfolio based on historical loss experience and are adjusted to reflect current events, trends and economic conditions. Some of the factors for making these adjustments include: changes in underwriting guidelines or credit scoring models; trends in consumer payment patterns, delinquencies and personal bankruptcies; changes in the mix of loan products outstanding; experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff; value of underlying collateral; and charge-off trends.

The average reserve rate for retail real estate loans was .43 percent for 2006 compared to .40 percent for 2005 and 2004. This increase was primarily driven by deterioration in retail real estate construction loans. The average reserve rate for other retail loans, which represented less than one percent of total loans in 2006, was 2.48 percent for 2006 compared to 2.38 percent for 2005. The average reserve rate for credit card receivables, also less than one percent of total loans, decreased to 3.45 percent for 2006 from 3.98 in 2005 and 4.02 in 2004.

Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming loans consist of impaired, other nonaccrual and restructured loans. These, along with foreclosed real estate (excluding foreclosed real estate from GNMA loans), represent nonperforming assets. Impaired loans are those loans for which it is probable that all amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, will not be collected and for which recognition of interest income has been discontinued. Other nonaccrual loans are residential and other retail loans on which recognition of interest income has been discontinued.

Nonperforming assets increased to $139.0 million on December 31, 2006, from $79.7 million on December 31, 2005, as the loan portfolio grew $1.5 billion from December 31, 2005. Nonperforming assets in retail/commercial banking were $114.1 million for 2006 compared to $59.7 million for 2005. The retail/commercial banking nonperforming assets ratio increased to .52 percent from .29 percent in 2005. The nonperforming assets ratio continues to migrate from historically low levels due to maturation of the loan portfolio, issues with several commercial credits in the retail commercial bank’s traditional lending markets, and deterioration in the residential real estate portfolio reflecting the slow down in the housing market. In addition, retail/commercial banking foreclosed assets increased $12.3 million in 2006, which can be attributed to the growth and maturing of the retail loan portfolio. Mortgage banking nonperforming assets were $24.9 million for 2006 compared to $20.0 million for 2005 reflecting higher levels of foreclosed real estate. Foreclosed assets are either charged-off or written down to net realizable value at foreclosure.

Information regarding nonperforming assets and past-due loans is presented in Table 22. Table 21 gives additional information related to changes in nonperforming assets for 2004 through 2006.

Table 21 - Changes in Nonperforming Assets


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004

Beginning balance		$ 79,669			$ 77,338			$ 76,195
Additional nonperforming assets		192,187			79,554			77,059
Payments, sales and other dispositions		(114,202	)		(67,036	)		(61,852	)
Charge-offs		(18,626	)		(10,187	)		(14,064	)

Ending balance		$ 139,028			$ 79,669			$ 77,338

Table 22 - Nonperforming Assets on December 31


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002			2001

Retail/Commercial Banking:
Nonperforming loans*		$ 82,837			$ 40,771			$ 41,102			$ 43,228			$ 58,454			$ 41,671
Foreclosed real estate		31,230			18,932			19,247			14,677			8,188			9,924
Other assets		—			—			—			336			33			130

Total Retail/Commercial Banking		114,067			59,703			60,349			58,241			66,675			51,725

Mortgage Banking:
Nonperforming loans		10,793			11,488			8,458			8,556			5,733			21,285
Foreclosed real estate		14,168			8,478			8,531			9,398			3,263			12,065

Total Mortgage Banking		24,961			19,966			16,989			17,954			8,996			33,350

Total nonperforming assets		$139,028			$ 79,669			$ 77,338			$ 76,195			$ 75,671			$ 85,075

Foreclosed real estate from GNMA loans**		$ 18,121			$ —			$ —			$ —			$ —			$ —
Potential problem assets***		161,727			187,208			98,926			118,142			125,255			123,535
Loans 30 to 89 days past due		131,211			97,980			69,593			88,874			100,723			117,298
Loans 30 to 89 days past due - guaranteed portion		161			1,021			873			2,404			3,202			4,388
Loans 90 days past due		35,248			37,067			33,343			27,240			37,083			37,665
Loans 90 days past due - guaranteed portion		242			5,348			5,561			5,620			5,987			6,076
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due****		31,264			45,788			56,379			73,458			10,731			11,415
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due - guaranteed portion****		24,586			30,868			43,542			60,551			—			—
Loans held for sale 90 days past due****		131,944			176,591			180,617			198,955			—			—
Loans held for sale 90 days past due - guaranteed portion****		128,627			173,357			179,792			198,955			—			—

Ratios:
Allowance to nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio		261	%		465	%		385	%		371	%		247	%		239	%
Nonperforming assets to loans, foreclosed real estate and other assets (Retail/Commercial Banking)		.52			.29			.37			.42			.59			.51
Nonperforming assets to unpaid principal balance of servicing portfolio (Mortgage Banking)		.02			.02			.02			.03			.02			.07

*	Total impaired loans included in nonperforming loans were $76.3 million, $36.6 million, $34.8 million, $34.4 million, $49.3 million and $37.8 million for the years 2006 through 2001, respectively.
**	Prior to 2006 properties acquired by foreclosure through GNMA’s repurchase program were classified as receivables in “Other assets” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
***	Includes past due loans.
****	Prior to 2003 government guaranteed loans repurchased through GNMA’s repurchase program were classified as receivables in “Other assets” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition and are not included in past due loan statistics. Guaranteed loans include FHA, VA, student and GNMA loans repurchased through the GNMA repurchase program.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Past Due Loans and Potential Problem Assets
Past due loans are loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, but which have not yet been put on nonaccrual status. Past due loans in the loan portfolio were stable at $35.2 million on December 31, 2006 compared to $37.1 million on December 31, 2005, with a ratio of past due loans in the loan portfolio to total loans of .16 percent on December 31, 2006, compared to .18 percent on December 31, 2005. Loans 30 to 89 days past due increased $33.2 million to $131.2 million while the ratio of portfolio loans 30 to 89 days past due to total loans increased to .59 percent on December 31, 2006 compared to .48 percent on December 31, 2005. This increase is primarily due to the slow-down in loan growth and the maturing of the retail

portfolio. The ratio continues to remain below historical levels. Additional historical past due loan information can be found in Table 22.

Potential problem assets in the loan portfolio, which includes loans past due 90 days or more but excludes nonperforming assets, decreased to $161.7 million, or .73 percent of total loans, on December 31, 2006, from $187.2 million, or .91 percent of total loans, on December 31, 2005. The current expectation of losses from potential problem assets has been included in management’s analysis for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Potential problem assets represent those assets where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for loans classified substandard.

Mortgage Banking
First Horizon Home Loans originates mortgage loans through its retail and wholesale operations and also purchases mortgage loans from third-party mortgage bankers (known as correspondent brokers) for sale to secondary market investors and subsequently services the majority of those loans. The secondary market for mortgages allows First Horizon Home Loans to sell mortgage loans to investors, including GSE, such as FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA. Many private investors are also active in the secondary market as issuers and investors. The majority of First Horizon Home Loans’ mortgage loans are sold through transactions with government agencies. The risk of credit loss with regard to the principal amount of the loans sold is generally transferred to investors upon sale to the secondary market. To the extent that transferred mortgage loans are subsequently determined not to meet the agreed-upon qualifications or criteria, or to the extent that transferred mortgages default shortly after the sale, the purchaser has the right to return those loans to First Horizon Home Loans. In addition, certain mortgage loans are sold to investors with limited or full recourse in the event of mortgage foreclosure (refer to discussion of foreclosure reserves under Critical Accounting Policies).

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
FHN’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The consolidated financial statements of FHN are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make certain judgments and assumptions in determining accounting estimates. Accounting estimates are considered critical if (a) the estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made, and (b) different estimates reasonably could have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, that would have a material impact on the presentation of FHN’s financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.

It is management’s practice to discuss critical accounting policies with the Board of Directors’ Audit Committee including the development, selection and disclosure of the critical accounting estimates. Management believes the following critical accounting policies are both important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations and require subjective or complex judgments. These judgments about critical accounting estimates are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2006, FHN elected early adoption of Statement SFAS No. 156. This amendment to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities” (SFAS No. 140) requires servicing rights be initially measured at fair value. Subsequently, companies are permitted to elect, on a class-by-class basis, either fair value or amortized cost accounting for servicing rights. FHN elected fair value accounting for all classes of mortgage servicing rights. Accordingly, FHN recognized the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle totaling $.2 million, net of tax, representing the excess of the fair value of the servicing asset over the recorded value on January 1, 2006.

Mortgage Servicing Rights and Other Related Retained Interests
When FHN sells mortgage loans in the secondary market to investors, it generally retains the right to service the loans sold in exchange for a servicing fee that is collected over the life of the loan as the payments are received from the borrower. An amount is capitalized as MSR on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. In 2005 these amounts were included at the lower of cost, net of accumulated amortization, or fair value. The cost basis of MSR qualifying for SFAS No. 133 fair value hedge accounting was adjusted to reflect changes in fair value. With the adoption of SFAS No. 156 on January 1, 2006, these amounts are included at current fair value. The changes in carrying value of MSR are included as a component of Mortgage Banking – Noninterest Income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

MSR Estimated Fair Value
The fair value of MSR typically rises as market interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates decrease; however, the extent to which this occurs depends in part on (1) the magnitude of changes in market interest rates, and (2) the differential between the then current market interest rates for mortgage loans and the mortgage interest rates included in the mortgage-servicing portfolio.

Since sales of MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair value of MSR. As such, like other participants in the mortgage banking business, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant risk characteristics of MSR, such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age (new, seasoned, moderate), agency type and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that it believes are comparable to those used by other participants in the mortgage banking business and reviews estimated fair values and assumptions with third-party brokers and other service providers on a quarterly basis. FHN also compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions to recent market activity and against its own experience.

Estimating the cash flow components of net servicing income from the loan and the resultant fair value of the MSR requires FHN to make several critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data.

Prepayment speeds: Generally, when market interest rates decline and other factors favorable to prepayments occur there is a corresponding increase in prepayments as customers refinance existing mortgages under more favorable interest rate terms. When a mortgage loan is prepaid the anticipated cash flows associated with servicing that loan are terminated, resulting in a reduction of the fair value of the capitalized MSR. To the extent that actual borrower prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed in the model does not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment model could fail to accurately predict mortgage prepayments and could result in significant earnings volatility. To estimate prepayment speeds, First Horizon Home Loans utilizes a third-party prepayment model, which is based upon statistically derived data linked to certain key principal indicators involving historical borrower prepayment activity associated with mortgage loans in the secondary market, current market interest rates and other factors, including First Horizon Home Loans’ own historical prepayment experience. For purposes of model valuation, estimates are made for each product type within the MSR portfolio on a monthly basis.

Table 23 - Mortgage Banking Prepayment Assumptions


	2006			2005			2004

Prepayment speeds
Actual		17.4	%		24.8	%		27.8	%
Estimated*		13.9			22.4			23.8

* Estimated prepayment speeds represent monthly average prepayment speed estimates for each of the years presented.

Discount rate: Represents the rate at which expected cash flows are discounted to arrive at the net present value of servicing income. Discount rates will change with market conditions (i.e., supply vs. demand) and be reflective of the yields expected to be earned by market participants investing in MSR.

Cost to service: Expected costs to service are estimated based upon the incremental costs that a market participant would use in evaluating the potential acquisition of MSR.

Float income: Estimated float income is driven by expected float balances (principal, interest and escrow payments that are held pending remittance to the investor or other third party) and current market interest rates, including the thirty-day London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and five-year swap interest rates, which are updated on a monthly basis for purposes of estimating the fair value of MSR.

First Horizon Home Loans engages in a process referred to as “price discovery” on a quarterly basis to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair value of MSR. Price discovery is conducted through a process of obtaining the following information: (a) quarterly informal (and an annual formal) valuation of the servicing portfolio by an independent third party: a prominent mortgage-servicing broker, and (b) a collection of surveys and benchmarking data made available by independent third parties that include peer participants in the mortgage banking business. Although there is no single source of market information that can be relied upon to assess the fair value of MSR, First Horizon Home Loans reviews all information obtained during price discovery to determine whether the estimated fair value of MSR is reasonable when compared to market information. On December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, First Horizon Home Loans determined that its MSR valuations and assumptions were reasonable based on the price discovery process.

The First Horizon Risk Management Committee (FHRMC) reviews the overall assessment of the estimated fair value of MSR monthly. The FHRMC is responsible for approving the critical assumptions used by management to determine the estimated fair value of First Horizon Home Loans’ MSR. In addition each quarter, FHN’s MSR Committee reviews the initial capitalization rates for newly originated MSR, the assessment of the fair value of MSR and the source of significant changes to the MSR carrying value.

Hedging the Fair Value of MSR
First Horizon Home Loans enters into financial agreements to hedge MSR in order to minimize the effects of loss in value of MSR associated with increased prepayment activity that generally results from declining interest rates. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of the MSR generally will increase while the value of the hedge instruments will decline. Specifically, First Horizon Home Loans enters into interest rate contracts (including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) to hedge against the effects of changes in fair value of its MSR. Substantially all capitalized MSR are hedged for economic purposes.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 156, First Horizon Home Loans hedged the changes in MSR value attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate (10-year LIBOR swap rate). The vast majority of MSR routinely qualified for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. For purposes of measuring effectiveness of the hedge, time decay and recognized net interest income, including changes in value attributable to changes in spot and forward prices, if applicable, were excluded from the change in value of the related derivatives. Interest rate derivative contracts used to hedge against interest rate risk in the servicing portfolio were designated to specific risk tranches of servicing. Hedges were reset at least monthly and more frequently, as needed, to respond to changes in interest rates or hedge composition. Generally, a coverage ratio approximating 100 percent was maintained on hedged MSR. Prior to acquiring a new hedge instrument, First Horizon Home Loans performed a prospective evaluation of anticipated hedge effectiveness by reviewing the historical regression between the underlying index of the proposed hedge instrument and the mortgage rate. At the end of each hedge period, the change in the fair value of the hedged MSR asset due to the change in benchmark interest rate was calculated and became a historical data point. Retrospective hedge effectiveness was determined by performing a regression analysis of all collected data points over a rolling 12-month period. Effective hedging under SFAS No. 133 resulted in adjustments to the recorded value of the MSR. These basis adjustments, as well as the change in fair value of derivatives attributable to effective hedging, were included as a component of servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income.

MSR subject to SFAS No. 133 hedges totaled $1.3 billion on December 31, 2005. Related derivative net liabilities were $21.2 million on December 31, 2005. Pursuant to SFAS No. 133, the basis in MSR that qualified for hedge accounting was adjusted for the impact of hedge performance in net servicing income. Included in servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income for 2005 was a net loss of $1.9 million, representing fair value hedge ineffectiveness and a net gain of $13.9 million, representing recognized net interest income, net of time decay, which was excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

With the adoption of SFAS No. 156, First Horizon Home Loans no longer evaluates prospective or retrospective hedge performance for qualification as a SFAS No. 133 hedge. The hedges are economic hedges only, and are terminated and reestablished as needed to respond to changes in market conditions. Changes in the value of the hedges continue to be recognized as a component of net servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income. Successful economic hedging will help minimize earnings volatility that may result when carrying MSR at fair value.

First Horizon Home Loans generally experiences increased loan origination and production in periods of low interest rates which, at the time of sale, result in the capitalization of new MSR associated with new production. This provides for a “natural hedge” in the mortgage-banking business cycle. New production and origination does not prevent First Horizon Home Loans from recognizing losses due to reduction in carrying value of existing servicing rights as a result of prepayments; rather, the new production volume results in loan origination fees and the capitalization of MSR as a component of realized gains related to the sale of such loans in the secondary market, thus the natural hedge, which tends to offset a portion of the reduction in MSR carrying value during a period of low interest rates. In a period of increased borrower prepayments, these losses can be significantly offset by a strong replenishment rate and strong net margins on new loan originations. To the extent that First Horizon Home Loans is unable to maintain a strong replenishment rate, or in the event that the net margin on new loan originations declines from historical experience, the value of the natural hedge may diminish, thereby significantly impacting the results of operations in a period of increased borrower prepayments.

First Horizon Home Loans does not specifically hedge the change in fair value of MSR attributed to other risks, including unanticipated prepayments (representing the difference between actual prepayment experience and estimated prepayments derived from the model, as described above), basis risk (meaning, the risk that changes in the benchmark interest rate may not correlate to changes in the mortgage market interest rate), discount rates, cost to service and other factors. To the extent that these other factors result in changes to the fair value of MSR, First Horizon Home Loans experiences volatility in current earnings due to the fact that these risks are not currently hedged.

Excess Interest (Interest-Only Strips) Fair Value – Residential Mortgage Loans
In certain cases, when First Horizon Home Loans sells mortgage loans in the secondary market, it retains an interest in the mortgage loans sold primarily through excess interest. These financial assets represent rights to receive earnings from serviced assets that exceed contractually specified servicing fees. Consistent with MSR, the fair value of excess interest typically rises as market interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates decrease. Additionally, similar to MSR, the market for excess interest is limited, and the precise terms of transactions involving excess interest are not typically readily available. Accordingly, First Horizon Home Loans relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its excess interest.

Estimating the cash flow components and the resultant fair value of the excess interest requires First Horizon Home Loans to make certain critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data. The primary critical assumptions used by First Horizon Home Loans to estimate the fair value of excess interest include prepayment speeds and discount rates, as discussed above. First Horizon Home Loans’ excess interest is included as a component of trading securities on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of mortgage banking noninterest income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Hedging the Fair Value of Excess Interest
First Horizon Home Loans utilizes derivatives (including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) that change in value inversely to the movement of interest rates to protect the value of its excess interest as an economic hedge. Realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with the change in fair value of derivatives used in the economic hedge of excess interest are included in current earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income. Excess interest is included in trading securities with changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income.

The extent to which the change in fair value of excess interest is offset by the change in fair value of the derivatives used to hedge this asset depends primarily on the hedge coverage ratio maintained by First Horizon Home Loans. Also, as noted above, to the extent that actual borrower prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed in the model does not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment model could fail to accurately predict mortgage prepayments, which could significantly impact First Horizon Home Loans’ ability to effectively hedge certain components of the change in fair value of excess interest and could result in significant earnings volatility.

Residual-Interest Certificates Fair Value – HELOC and Second-lien Mortgages
In certain cases, when FHN sells HELOC or second-lien mortgages in the secondary market, it retains an interest in the loans sold primarily through a residual-interest certificate. Residual-interest certificates are financial assets which represent rights to receive earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the underlying loan collateral of certain mortgage-backed securities, which is not needed to meet contractual obligations of senior security holders. The fair value of a residual-interest certificate typically changes based on the differences between modeled prepayment speeds and credit losses and actual experience. Additionally, similar to MSR and interest-only certificates, the market for residual-interest certificates is limited, and the precise terms of transactions involving residual-interest certificates are not typically readily available. Accordingly, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model, which is prepared monthly, to estimate the fair value of its residual-interest certificates.

Estimating the cash flow components and the resultant fair value of the residual-interest certificates requires FHN to make certain critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data. The primary critical assumptions used by FHN to estimate the fair value of residual-interest certificates include prepayment speeds, credit losses and discount rates, as discussed above. FHN’s residual-interest certificates are included as a component of trading securities on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of other income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. FHN does not utilize derivatives to hedge against changes in the fair value of residual-interest certificates.

Pipeline and Warehouse
During the period of loan origination, and prior to the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market, First Horizon Home Loans has exposure to mortgage loans that are in the “mortgage pipeline” and the “mortgage warehouse”. The mortgage pipeline consists of loan applications that have been received, but have not yet closed as loans. Pipeline loans are either “floating” or “locked”. A floating pipeline loan is one on which an interest rate has not been locked by the borrower. A locked pipeline loan is one on which the potential borrower has set the interest rate for the loan by entering into an interest rate lock commitment resulting in interest rate risk to First Horizon Home Loans. Once a mortgage loan is closed and funded, it is included within the mortgage warehouse, or the “inventory” of mortgage loans that are awaiting sale and delivery (currently an average of approximately 30 days) into the secondary market. First Horizon Home Loans is exposed to credit risk while a mortgage loan is in the warehouse. Third party models are used in managing interest rate risk related to price movements on loans in the pipeline and the warehouse.

First Horizon Home Loans’ warehouse (first-lien mortgage loans held for sale) is subject to changes in fair value, primarily due to fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, First Horizon Home Loans enters into forward sales contracts and futures contracts to provide an economic hedge against those changes in fair value on a significant portion of the warehouse. These derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of the gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.

correlation is calculated using these daily data points. Retrospective hedge effectiveness is measured using the regression results. First Horizon Home Loans generally maintains a coverage ratio (the ratio of expected change in the fair value of derivatives to expected change in the fair value of hedged assets) of approximately 100 percent on warehouse loans accounted for under SFAS No. 133.

Warehouse loans qualifying for SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting treatment totaled $1.2 billion and $1.4 billion on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The balance sheet impacts of the related derivatives were net assets of $1.8 million and net liabilities of $.5 million on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included as a component of the gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income were net losses of $11.5 million, $1.2 million, and $16.6 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, representing fair value hedge ineffectiveness. Pursuant to SFAS No. 133, the basis in loans that qualify for hedge accounting are adjusted for the impact of hedge performance through gain or loss on the sale of loans.

Mortgage banking interest rate lock commitments are short-term commitments to fund mortgage loan applications in process (the pipeline) for a fixed term at a fixed price. During the term of an interest rate lock commitment, First Horizon Home Loans has the risk that interest rates will change from the rate quoted to the borrower. First Horizon Home Loans enters into forward sales contracts with respect to fixed rate loan commitments and futures contracts with respect to adjustable rate loan commitments as economic hedges designed to protect the value of the interest rate lock commitment from changes in value due to changes in interest rates. Under SFAS No. 133 interest rate lock commitments qualify as derivative financial instruments and as such do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. As a result, the interest rate lock commitments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income. Interest rate lock commitments generally have a term of up to 60 days before the closing of the loan. The interest rate lock commitment, however, does not bind the potential borrower to entering into the loan, nor does it guarantee that First Horizon Home Loans will approve the potential borrower for the loan. Therefore, First Horizon Home Loans makes estimates of expected “fallout” (locked pipeline loans not expected to close), using models which consider cumulative historical fallout rates and other factors. Fallout can occur for a variety of reasons including falling rate environments when a borrower will abandon an interest rate lock commitment at one lender and enter into a new lower interest rate lock commitment at another, when a borrower is not approved as an acceptable credit by the lender, or for a variety of other non-economic reasons. Note that once a loan is closed, the risk of fallout is eliminated and the associated mortgage loan is included in the mortgage loan warehouse.

The extent to which First Horizon Home Loans is able to economically hedge changes in the mortgage pipeline depends largely on the hedge coverage ratio that is maintained relative to mortgage loans in the pipeline. The hedge coverage ratio can change significantly due to changes in market interest rates and the associated forward commitment prices for sales of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Increases or decreases in the hedge coverage ratio can result in significant earnings volatility to FHN.

For the periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the valuation model utilized to estimate the fair value of interest rate lock commitments assumes a zero fair value on the date of the lock with the borrower. Subsequent to the lock date, the model calculates the change in value due solely to the change in interest rates resulting in net assets with estimated fair values of $10.9 million and $8.3 million on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Foreclosure Reserves
As discussed above, First Horizon Home Loans typically originates mortgage loans with the intent to sell those loans to GSE and other private investors in the secondary market. Certain of the mortgage loans are sold with limited or full recourse in the event of foreclosure. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, the outstanding principal balance of mortgage loans sold with limited recourse arrangements where some portion of the principal is at risk and serviced by First Horizon Home Loans was $3.0 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively. Additionally, on December 31, 2006 and 2005, $5.0 billion and $5.7 billion, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding which were sold under limited recourse arrangements where the risk is limited to interest and servicing advances. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, $116.4 million and $147.3 million, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding which were sold under full recourse arrangements.

Loans sold with limited recourse include loans sold under government guaranteed mortgage loan programs including the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Veterans Administration (VA). First Horizon Home Loans

continues to absorb losses due to uncollected interest and foreclosure costs and/or limited risk of credit losses in the event of foreclosure of the mortgage loan sold. Generally, the amount of recourse liability in the event of foreclosure is determined based upon the respective government program and/or the sale or disposal of the foreclosed property collateralizing the mortgage loan. Another instance of limited recourse is the VA/No bid. In this case, the VA guarantee is limited and First Horizon Home Loans may be required to fund any deficiency in excess of the VA guarantee if the loan goes to foreclosure.

Loans sold with full recourse generally include mortgage loans sold to investors in the secondary market which are uninsurable under government guaranteed mortgage loan programs, due to issues associated with underwriting activities, documentation or other concerns.

Management closely monitors historical experience, borrower payment activity, current economic trends and other risk factors, and establishes a reserve for foreclosure losses for loans sold with limited or full recourse, loans serviced with full recourse, and loans sold with general representations and warranties, including early payment defaults. Management believes the foreclosure reserve is sufficient to cover incurred foreclosure losses relating to loans being serviced as well as loans sold where the servicing was not retained. The reserve for foreclosure losses is based upon a historical progression model using a rolling 12-month average, which predicts the probability or frequency of a mortgage loan entering foreclosure. In addition, other factors are considered, including qualitative and quantitative factors (e.g., current economic conditions, past collection experience, risk characteristics of the current portfolio and other factors), which are not defined by historical loss trends or severity of losses. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, the foreclosure reserve was $14.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively. While the servicing portfolio has grown from $95.3 billion on December 31, 2005, to $101.8 billion on December 31, 2006, the foreclosure reserve has decreased primarily due to the decline in the limited and full recourse portfolios. This decrease was partially offset by increased reserves for loans sold with recourse for early payment default. Table 24 provides a summary of reserves for foreclosure losses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Table 24 - Reserves for Foreclosure Losses


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004

Beginning balance		$ 16,372			$ 18,500			$ 22,323
Provision for foreclosure losses		13,897			8,562			3,574
Charge-offs		(18,363	)		(13,224	)		(11,448	)
Recoveries		2,130			2,534			4,051

Ending balance		$ 14,036			$ 16,372			$ 18,500

Allowance for Loan Losses
Management’s policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb estimated probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its loan portfolio to identify trends and to assess the overall collectibility of the loan portfolio. Accounting standards require that loan losses be recorded when management determines it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Management believes the accounting estimate related to the allowance for loan losses is a “critical accounting estimate” because: changes in it can materially affect the provision for loan losses and net income, it requires management to predict borrowers’ likelihood or capacity to repay, and it requires management to distinguish between losses incurred as of a balance sheet date and losses expected to be incurred in the future. Accordingly, this is a highly subjective process and requires significant judgment since it is often difficult to determine when specific loss events may actually occur. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries and is decreased by charged-off loans. This critical accounting estimate applies primarily to the Retail/Commercial Banking segment. The Credit Policy and Executive Committees of FHN’s board of directors review quarterly the level of the allowance for loan losses.

FHN’s methodology for estimating the allowance for loan losses is not only critical to the accounting estimate, but to the credit risk management function as well. Key components of the estimation process are as follows: (1) commercial loans determined by management to be individually impaired loans are evaluated individually and

specific reserves are determined based on the difference between the outstanding loan amount and the estimated net realizable value of the collateral (if collateral dependent) or the present value of expected future cash flows; (2) individual commercial loans not considered to be individually impaired are segmented based on similar credit risk characteristics and evaluated on a pool basis; (3) retail loans are segmented based on loan types and credit score bands and loan to value; (4) reserve rates for each portfolio segment are calculated based on historical charge-offs and are adjusted by management to reflect current events, trends and conditions (including economic factors and trends); and (5) management’s estimate of probable incurred losses reflects the reserve rate applied against the balance of loans in each segment of the loan portfolio.

Principal loan amounts are charged off against the allowance for loan losses in the period in which the loan or any portion of the loan is deemed to be uncollectible.

FHN believes that the critical assumptions underlying the accounting estimate made by management include: (1) the commercial loan portfolio has been properly risk graded based on information about borrowers in specific industries and specific issues with respect to single borrowers; (2) borrower specific information made available to FHN is current and accurate; (3) the loan portfolio has been segmented properly and individual loans have similar credit risk characteristics and will behave similarly; (4) known significant loss events that have occurred were considered by management at the time of assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; (5) the economic factors utilized in the allowance for loan losses estimate are used as a measure of actual incurred losses; (6) the period of history used for historical loss factors is indicative of the current environment; and (7) the reserve rates, as well as other adjustments estimated by management for current events, trends, and conditions, utilized in the process reflect an estimate of losses that have been incurred as of the date of the financial statements.

While management uses the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses and methodology may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the estimates or, if required by regulators, based upon information at the time of their examinations. Such adjustments to original estimates, as necessary, are made in the period in which these factors and other relevant considerations indicate that loss levels vary from previous estimates. There have been no significant changes to the methodology for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Goodwill and Assessment of Impairment
FHN’s policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or between annual assessments if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment is the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Accounting standards require management to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit in making the assessment of impairment at least annually. As of October 1, 2006, FHN engaged an independent valuation firm to compute the fair value estimates of each reporting unit as part of its annual impairment assessment. The independent valuation utilized three separate valuation methodologies and applied a weighted average to each methodology in order to determine fair value for each reporting unit. The valuation as of October 1, 2006, indicated no goodwill impairment for any of the reporting units.

Management believes the accounting estimates associated with determining fair value as part of the goodwill impairment test is a “critical accounting estimate” because estimates and assumptions are made about FHN’s future performance and cash flows, as well as other prevailing market factors (interest rates, economic trends, etc.). FHN’s policy allows management to make the determination of fair value using internal cash flow models or by engaging independent third parties. If a charge to operations for impairment results, this amount would be reported separately as a component of noninterest expense. This critical accounting estimate applies to the Retail/Commercial Banking, Mortgage Banking and Capital Markets business segments. Reporting units have been defined as the same level as the operating business segments.

The impairment testing process conducted by FHN begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to each reporting unit. FHN then completes “step one” of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value (or “carrying amount”) of its net assets, with goodwill included in the computation of the carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its

carrying amount, goodwill of that reporting unit is not considered impaired, and “step two” of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment test is performed to determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the “implied fair value” of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is computed by assuming all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit would be adjusted to the current fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill. This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value used in step two. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

In connection with obtaining the independent valuation, management provided certain data and information that was utilized by the third party in its determination of fair value. This information included budgeted and forecasted earnings of FHN at the reporting unit level. Management believes that this information is a critical assumption underlying the estimate of fair value. The independent third party made other assumptions critical to the process, including discount rates, asset and liability growth rates, and other income and expense estimates, through discussions with management.

While management uses the best information available to estimate future performance for each reporting unit, future adjustments to management’s projections may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the estimates.

Contingent Liabilities
A liability is contingent if the amount or outcome is not presently known, but may become known in the future as a result of the occurrence of some uncertain future event. FHN estimates its contingent liabilities based on management’s estimates about the probability of outcomes and their ability to estimate the range of exposure. Accounting standards require that a liability be recorded if management determines that it is probable that a loss has occurred and the loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, it must be probable that the loss will be confirmed by some future event. As part of the estimation process, management is required to make assumptions about matters that are by their nature highly uncertain.

The assessment of contingent liabilities, including legal contingencies, which considers the outcome of various lawsuits as they are determined and the value of legal claims, and income tax liabilities, involves the use of critical estimates, assumptions and judgments. Management’s estimates are based on their belief that future events will validate the current assumptions regarding the ultimate outcome of these exposures. However, there can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or I.R.S. positions, will not differ from management’s assessments. Whenever practicable, management consults with third party experts (attorneys, accountants, claims administrators, etc.) to assist with the gathering and evaluation of information related to contingent liabilities. Based on internally and/or externally prepared evaluations, management makes a determination whether the potential exposure requires accrual in the financial statements. Note 18 – Restrictions, Contingencies and Other Disclosures provides additional information.

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Table 25 - Summary of Quarterly Financial Information


	2006									2005

(Dollars in millions except per share data)	Fourth Quarter		Third Quarter			Second Quarter		First Quarter		Fourth Quarter			Third Quarter		Second Quarter		First Quarter

Summary income information:
Interest income	$	604.6	$	612.5		$	578.6	$	533.4	$	519.5		$	497.4	$	438.5	$	384.8
Interest expense		358.6		360.9			325.0		287.7		264.7			237.3		196.8		157.4
Provision for loan losses		23.0		23.7			18.6		17.8		16.2			22.6		15.8		13.1
Noninterest income		316.4		317.9			335.0		197.6		322.6			342.2		319.6		322.9
Noninterest expense		431.6		452.9			423.0		435.1		414.9			421.7		405.8		384.5
Income from continuing operations		76.3		67.2			103.9		3.4		103.6			108.1		96.2		102.8
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		.2		(.1	)		.4		210.3		5.4			4.9		3.8		3.0
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		—		—			—		1.3		(3.1	)		—		—		—
Net income		76.5		67.1			104.3		215.0		105.9			113.0		100.0		105.8

Earnings per common share from continuing operations	$	.61	$	.54		$	.84	$	.03	$	.82		$	.86	$	.77	$	.82
Earnings per common share before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		.61		.54			.84		1.70		.86			.90		.80		.85
Earnings per common share		.61		.54			.84		1.71		.83			.90		.80		.85
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations		.60		.53			.82		.03		.80			.83		.74		.80
Diluted earnings per common share before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		.60		.53			.82		1.66		.84			.87		.77		.83
Diluted earnings per common share		.60		.53			.82		1.67		.81			.87		.77		.83

Common stock information:
Closing price per share:
High	$	41.90	$	42.76		$	42.42	$	41.68	$	40.02		$	44.55	$	43.26	$	44.28
Low		38.23		38.01			38.64		37.20		35.13			36.35		38.77		40.00
Period-end		41.78		38.01			40.20		41.65		38.44			36.35		42.20		40.79
Dividends declared per share		.45		.45			.45		.45		.45			.43		.43		.43

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” (SFAS No. 155), which permits fair value remeasurement for hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. Additionally, SFAS No. 155 clarifies the accounting guidance for beneficial interests in securitizations. Under SFAS No. 155, all beneficial interests in a securitization will require an assessment in accordance with SFAS No. 133 to determine if an embedded derivative exists within the instrument. In January 2007, the FASB issued Derivatives Implementation

Group Issue B 40, “Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized Interests in Prepayable Financial Assets” (DIG B40). DIG B40 provides an exemption from the embedded derivative test of paragraph 13(b) of SFAS No. 133 for instruments that would otherwise require bifurcation if the test is met solely because of a prepayment feature included within the securitized interest and prepayment is not controlled by the security holder. SFAS No. 155 and DIG B40 are effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Since FHN presents all retained interests in its propriety securitizations as trading securities and due to the clarifying guidance of DIG B40, FHN does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 to be significant to the results of operations.

In July 2006, FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48) was issued. FIN 48 provides guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on the classification and disclosure of uncertain tax positions in the financial statements. Adoption of FIN 48 requires a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings for differences between the tax benefits recognized in the statements of condition prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. While FHN continues to evaluate the effect of adopting FIN 48, management does not expect FIN 48 to have a material effect on retained earnings.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157), which establishes a hierarchy to be used in performing measurements of fair value. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value should be determined from the perspective of a market participant while also indicating that valuation methodologies should first reference available market data before using internally developed assumptions. Additionally, SFAS No. 157 provides expanded disclosure requirements regarding the effects of fair value measurements on the financial statements. SFAS No. 157 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years in which financial statements have not been issued. FHN is currently assessing the financial impact of adopting SFAS No. 157.

In September 2006, the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (EITF 06-4) was ratified by the FASB. EITF 06-4 requires that a liability be recognized for contracts written to employees which provide future postretirement benefits that are covered by endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements because such obligations are not considered to be effectively settled upon entering into the related insurance arrangements. EITF 06-4 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, with the guidance applied using either a retrospective approach or through a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. FHN is currently assessing the financial impact of adopting EITF 06-4.

In September 2006, the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 06-5, “Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance—Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance” (EITF 06-5) was ratified by the FASB. EITF 06-5 provides that in addition to cash surrender value, the asset recognized for a life insurance contract should consider certain other provisions included in a policy’s contractual terms with additional amounts being discounted if receivable beyond one year. Additionally, EITF 06-5 requires that the determination of the amount that could be realized under an insurance contract be performed at the individual policy level. EITF 06-5 is effective January 1, 2007, with the guidance applied using either a retrospective approach or through a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. FHN expects to recognize a reduction of retained earnings approximating $550,000 as a result of adopting EITF 06-5.

similar assets and liabilities which are measured using another measurement attribute. SFAS No. 159 also provides expanded disclosure requirements regarding the effects of electing the fair value option on the financial statements. SFAS No. 159 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years in which interim financial statements have not been issued, provided that all of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 are early adopted as well. FHN is currently assessing the financial impact of adopting SFAS No. 159.

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL TERMS

Allowance for Loan Losses - Valuation reserve representing the amount considered by management to be adequate to cover estimated probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio.

Basis Point - The equivalent of one-hundredth of one percent. One hundred basis points equals one percent. This unit is generally used to measure movements in interest yields and rates.

Book Value Per Common Share - A ratio determined by dividing shareholders’ equity at the end of a period by the number of common shares outstanding at the end of that period.

Commercial Paper - A short-term unsecured debt obligation of the parent company with maturities typically of less than 90 days.

Commercial and Standby Letters of Credit - Commercial letters of credit are issued or confirmed by an entity to ensure the payment of its customers’ payables and receivables. Standby letters of credit are issued by an entity to ensure its customers’ performance in dealing with others.

Commitment to Extend Credit - Agreements to make or acquire a loan or lease as long as agreed-upon terms (e.g., expiration date, covenants, or notice) are met. Generally these commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.

Core Deposits - Core deposits consist of all interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits, except certificates of deposit over $100,000. They include checking interest deposits, money market deposit accounts, time and other savings, plus demand deposits.

Derivative Financial Instrument - A contract or agreement whose value is derived from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, prices of securities or commodities, or financial or commodity indices.

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share - Net income, divided by weighted average shares outstanding plus the effect of common stock equivalents that have the potential to be converted into common shares.

Earning Assets - Assets that generate interest or dividend income or yield-related fee income, such as loans and investment securities.

Earnings Per Common Share - Net income, divided by the weighted average number of common shares.

Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) - Reflects the rate of tax-exempt income adjusted to a level that would yield the same after-tax income had that income been subject to taxation.

Interest-Only Strip - Mortgage security consisting of the interest rate portion of a stripped mortgage backed security.

Interest Rate Caps and Floors - Contracts with notional principal amounts that require the seller, in exchange for a fee, to make payments to the purchaser if a specified market interest rate exceeds a fixed upper “capped” level or falls below a fixed lower “floor” level on specified future dates.

Interest Rate Forward Contracts - Contracts representing commitments either to purchase or sell at a specified future date a specified security or financial instrument at a specified price, and may be settled in cash or through delivery.

Interest Rate Option - A contract that grants the holder (purchaser), for a fee, the right to either purchase or sell a financial instrument at a specified price within a specified period of time or on a specified date from or to the writer (seller) of the option.

Interest Rate Swap - An agreement in which two entities agree to exchange, at specified intervals, interest payment streams calculated on an agreed-upon notional principal amount with at least one stream based on a floating rate index.

Interest Rate Swaptions - Are options on interest rate swaps that give the purchaser the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap agreement during a specified period of time.

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL TERMS (continued)

Leverage Ratio - Ratio consisting of Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average assets adjusted for certain unrealized gains/(losses) on available for sale securities, goodwill, certain other intangible assets, the disallowable portion of mortgage servicing rights and other disallowed assets.

Market Capitalization - Market value of a company computed by multiplying the number of shares outstanding by the current stock price.

Mortgage Backed Securities - Investment securities backed by a pool of mortgages or trust deeds. Principal and interest payments on the underlying mortgages are used to pay principal and interest on the securities.

Mortgage Pipeline - Interest rate commitments made to customers on mortgage loans that have not yet been closed and funded.

Mortgage Warehouse - A mortgage loan that has been closed and funded and is awaiting sale and delivery into the secondary market.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR) - The right to service mortgage loans, generally owned by someone else, for a fee. Loan servicing includes collecting payments; remitting funds to investors, insurance companies, and taxing authorities; collecting delinquent payments; and foreclosing on properties when necessary.

Net Interest Income (NII) - Interest income less interest expense.

Net Interest Margin (NIM) - Expressed as a percentage, net interest margin is a ratio computed by dividing fully taxable equivalent net interest income by average earning assets.

Net Interest Spread - The difference between the average yield earned on earning assets on a fully taxable equivalent basis and the average rate paid for interest-bearing liabilities.

Nonaccrual Loans - Loans on which interest accruals have been discontinued due to the borrower’s financial difficulties. Interest income on these loans is reported on a cash basis as it is collected after recovery of principal.

Nonperforming Assets - Interest-earning assets on which interest income is not being accrued, real estate properties acquired through foreclosure and repossessed assets.

Origination Fees - A fee charged to the borrower by the lender to originate a loan. Usually stated as a percentage of the face value of the loan.

Provision for Loan Losses - The periodic charge to earnings for potential losses in the loan portfolio.

Purchase Obligation - An agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding and that specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

Purchased Funds - The combination of certificates of deposit greater than $100,000, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, bank notes, commercial paper, and other short-term borrowings.

Repurchase Agreement - A method of short-term financing where one party agrees to buy back, at a future date (generally overnight) and an agreed-upon price, a security it sells to another party.

Residual-Interest Certificates - Financial assets which represent rights to receive earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the underlying loan collateral of certain mortgage-backed securities, which is not needed to meet contractual obligations of senior security holders.

Return on Average Assets (ROA) - A measure of profitability that is calculated by dividing net income by total average assets.

Return on Average Equity (ROE) - A measure of profitability that indicates what an institution earned on its shareholders’ investment. ROE is calculated by dividing net income by total average shareholders’ equity.

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL TERMS (continued)

Risk-Adjusted Assets - A regulatory risk-based calculation that takes into account the broad differences in risks among a banking organization’s assets and off-balance sheet financial instruments.

Tier 1 Capital Ratio - Ratio consisting of shareholders’ equity adjusted for certain unrealized gains/(losses) on available for sale securities, reduced by goodwill, certain other intangible assets, the disallowable portion of mortgage servicing rights and other disallowed assets divided by risk-adjusted assets.

Total Capital Ratio - Ratio consisting of Tier 1 capital plus the allowable portion of the allowance for loan losses and qualifying subordinated debt divided by risk-adjusted assets.

FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING

Management of First Horizon National Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. First Horizon National Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Even effective internal controls, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations such as the possibility of human error or of circumvention or overriding of controls, and consideration of cost in relation to benefit of a control. Moreover, effectiveness must necessarily be considered according to the existing state of the art of internal control. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal controls may diminish over time.

Management assessed the effectiveness of First Horizon National Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that First Horizon National Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.

First Horizon National Corporation’s independent auditors have issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of First Horizon National Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. That report appears on the following page.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
First Horizon National Corporation:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting , that First Horizon National Corporation (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) . The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that First Horizon National Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, First Horizon National Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of First Horizon National Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Memphis, Tennessee
February 26, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
First Horizon National Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of First Horizon National Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as established by the Auditing Standards Board (United States) and in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Horizon National Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of First Horizon National Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based payments and servicing rights effective January 1, 2006 and, effective December 31, 2006, its method of accounting for defined pension and postretirement benefit plans.

Memphis, Tennessee
February 26, 2007

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION


	December 31

(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005

Assets:
Cash and due from banks (Note 18)		$ 976,619			$ 945,547
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell		1,202,537			1,485,199

Total cash and cash equivalents		2,179,156			2,430,746

Investment in bank time deposits		18,037			10,687
Trading securities		2,230,745			2,133,428
Loans held for sale		2,873,577			4,424,267
Securities available for sale (Note 3)		3,890,151			2,912,103
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $272 on December 31, 2006, and $390 on December 31, 2005) (Note 3)		269			383
Loans, net of unearned income (Note 4)		22,104,905			20,611,998
Less: Allowance for loan losses		216,285			189,705

Total net loans		21,888,620			20,422,293

Mortgage servicing rights, net (Note 6)		1,533,942			1,314,629
Goodwill (Note 7)		275,582			281,440
Other intangible assets, net (Note 7)		64,530			76,647
Capital markets receivables		732,282			511,508
Premises and equipment, net (Note 5)		451,708			408,539
Real estate acquired by foreclosure		63,519			27,410
Discontinued assets		416			163,545
Other assets		1,715,725			1,461,436

Total assets		$37,918,259			$36,579,061

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Deposits:
Savings		$ 3,354,180			$ 2,795,723
Time deposits		2,924,050			2,478,946
Other interest-bearing deposits		1,969,700			1,909,349
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more		6,517,629			10,931,695

Interest-bearing		14,765,559			18,115,713
Noninterest-bearing		5,447,673			5,201,844

Total deposits		20,213,232			23,317,557

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (Note 9)		4,961,799			3,735,742
Trading liabilities (Note 9)		789,957			793,638
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings (Note 9)		1,258,513			802,017
Term borrowings		5,243,961			3,437,643
Other collateralized borrowings		592,399			—

Total long-term debt (Note 10)		5,836,360			3,437,643

Capital markets payables		799,489			591,404
Discontinued liabilities		6,966			122,026
Other liabilities		1,294,283			1,136,221

Total liabilities		35,160,599			33,936,248

Preferred stock of subsidiary (Note 12)		295,270			295,274

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock - no par value (5,000,000 shares authorized, but unissued)		—			—
Common stock - $.625 par value (shares authorized - 400,000,000; shares issued - 124,865,982 on December 31, 2006 and 126,222,327 on December 31, 2005)		78,041			78,889
Capital surplus		312,521			404,964
Undivided profits		2,144,276			1,905,930
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net (Note 15)		(72,448	)		(42,244	)

Total shareholders’ equity		2,462,390			2,347,539

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$37,918,259			$36,579,061

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME


	Year Ended December 31

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)	2006			2005			2004

Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans		$ 1,591,006			$1,133,490			$ 774,688
Interest on investment securities		186,763			124,471			104,144
Interest on loans held for sale		288,161			377,882			226,832
Interest on trading securities		171,063			138,521			53,398
Interest on other earning assets		92,118			65,810			7,740

Total interest income		2,329,111			1,840,174			1,166,802

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits:
Savings		88,510			44,435			19,596
Time deposits		120,276			79,013			60,060
Other interest-bearing deposits		24,479			15,448			4,820
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more		493,177			363,983			108,003
Interest on trading liabilities		76,064			80,191			20,017
Interest on short-term borrowings		248,915			171,936			47,740
Interest on long-term debt		280,753			101,141			50,255

Total interest expense		1,332,174			856,147			310,491

Net interest income		996,937			984,027			856,311
Provision for loan losses		83,129			67,678			48,348

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		913,808			916,349			807,963

Noninterest income:
Capital markets		383,047			353,005			376,558
Mortgage banking		370,613			479,619			444,758
Deposit transactions and cash management		168,599			156,190			148,511
Revenue from loan sales and securitizations		51,675			47,575			23,115
Insurance commissions		46,632			54,091			56,109
Trust services and investment management		41,514			44,614			47,274
Equity securities gains/(losses), net		10,271			(579	)		2,040
Debt securities (losses)/gains, net		(75,900	)		1			18,708
Gains on divestitures		—			7,029			1,200
All other income and commissions (Note 14)		170,442			165,711			163,558

Total noninterest income		1,166,893			1,307,256			1,281,831

Adjusted gross income after provision for loan losses		2,080,701			2,223,605			2,089,794

Noninterest expense:
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits		1,023,685			988,946			899,803
Occupancy		116,670			104,161			87,570
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance		73,882			74,367			70,400
Operations services		70,041			71,949			59,642
Communications and courier		53,249			54,388			47,930
Amortization of intangible assets		11,462			10,700			6,157
All other expense (Note 14)		393,632			322,383			290,306

Total noninterest expense		1,742,621			1,626,894			1,461,808

Income before income taxes		338,080			596,711			627,986
Provision for income taxes (Note 16)		87,278			185,988			197,918

Income from continuing operations		250,802			410,723			430,068
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		210,767			17,072			15,640

Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		461,569			427,795			445,708
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		1,345			(3,098	)		—

Net income		$ 462,914			$ 424,697			$ 445,708

Earnings per common share from continuing operations (Note 17)		$ 2.02			$ 3.27			$ 3.45
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations, net of tax (Note 17)		1.69			.14			.12
Earnings/(loss) per common share from cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle (Note 17)		.01			(.03	)		—

Earnings per common share (Note 17)		$ 3.72			$ 3.38			$ 3.57

Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations (Note 17)		$ 1.96			$ 3.17			$ 3.35
Diluted earnings per common share from discontinued operations, net of tax (Note 17)		1.65			.14			.12
Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share from cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle (Note 17)		.01			(.03	)		—

Diluted earnings per common share (Note 17)		$ 3.62			$ 3.28			$ 3.47

Weighted average common shares (Note 17)		124,453			125,475			124,730

Diluted average common shares (Note 17)		127,917			129,364			128,436

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY


(Amounts in thousands)	Common Shares		Total		Common Stock		Capital Surplus		Undivided Profits		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income

Balance, December 31, 2003	124,834		$ 1,890,318		$ 78,021		$ 148,916		$ 1,662,699		$ 682
Adjustment to reflect change in accounting for employee share-based compensation	—		31,327		—		119,376		(88,049	)	—
Net income	—		445,708		—		—		445,708		—
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized fair value adjustments, net of tax:
Securities available for sale	—		(10,291	)	—		—		—		(10,291	)
Minimum pension liability, net of tax	—		(319	)	—		—		—		(319	)

Comprehensive income	—		466,425		—		119,376		357,659		(10,610	)

Cash dividends declared ($1.63/share)	—		(201,316	)	—		—		(201,316	)	—
Common stock repurchased	(4,134	)	(184,102	)	(2,584	)	(61,577	)	(119,941	)	—
Common stock issued for stock options and restricted stock	2,716		67,068		1,697		65,371		—		—
Tax benefit from incentive plans	—		12,156		—		12,156		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—		23,583		—		23,583		—		—
Other	116		3		73		(73	)	3		—

Balance, December 31, 2004	123,532		2,074,135		77,207		307,752		1,699,104		(9,928	)
Net income	—		424,697		—		—		424,697		—
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized fair value adjustments, net of tax:
Cash flow hedges	—		(77	)	—		—		—		(77	)
Securities available for sale	—		(32,375	)	—		—		—		(32,375	)
Minimum pension liability, net of tax	—		136		—		—		—		136

Comprehensive income	—		392,381		—		—		424,697		(32,316	)

Cash dividends declared ($1.74/share)	—		(217,835	)	—		—		(217,835	)	—
Common stock repurchased	(11	)	(488	)	(7	)	(481	)	—		—
Common stock issued for:
Stock options and restricted stock	2,037		41,073		1,274		39,799		—		—
Acquisitions	608		24,893		380		24,513		—		—
Tax benefit from incentive plans	—		2,453		—		2,453		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—		30,963		—		30,963		—		—
Other	56		(36	)	35		(35	)	(36	)	—

Balance, December 31, 2005	126,222		2,347,539		78,889		404,964		1,905,930		(42,244	)
Net income	—		462,914		—		—		462,914		—
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized fair value adjustments, net of tax:
Cash flow hedges	—		427		—		—		—		427
Securities available for sale	—		46,224		—		—		—		46,224
Minimum pension liability, net of tax	—		(197	)	—		—		—		(197	)

Comprehensive income	—		509,368		—		—		462,914		46,454

Cash dividends declared ($1.80/share)	—		(224,532	)	—		—		(224,532	)	—
Common stock repurchased	(4,088	)	(168,654	)	(2,555	)	(166,099	)	—		—
Common stock issued for:
Stock options and restricted stock	2,469		57,174		1,543		55,631		—		—
Acquisitions	13		486		8		478		—		—
Tax benefit from incentive plans	—		3,592		—		3,592		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—		15,891		—		15,891		—		—
Adjustment to reflect change in accounting for employee stock option forfeitures	—		(1,780	)	—		(1,780	)	—		—
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of tax	—		(76,658	)	—		—		—		(76,658	)
Other	250		(36	)	156		(156	)	(36	)	—

Balance, December 31, 2006	124,866		$ 2,462,390		$ 78,041		$ 312,521		$ 2,144,276		$ (72,448	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


		Year Ended December 31

(Dollars in thousands)		2006			2005			2004

Operating	Net income		$ 462,914		$ 424,697			$ 445,708
Activities	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided/(used) by operating activities:
	Provision for loan losses		83,129			67,678			48,348
	Provision for deferred income tax		102,738			31,562			39,647
	Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		53,550			51,844			48,731
	Amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights		—			230,044			191,363
	Amortization of intangible assets		11,687			13,734			9,541
	Net other amortization and accretion		79,569			81,453			73,105
	(Increase)/decrease in derivatives, net		(126,440	)		142,769			159,123
	Market value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights		(50,204	)		—			—
	Provision for foreclosure reserve		12,903			6,314			4,022
	Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		(1,345	)		3,098			—
	Gain on divestiture		(211,172	)		(7,029	)		(7,000	)
	Stock-based compensation expense		15,891			30,343			15,716
	Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements		(3,592	)		(2,454	)		(12,156	)
	Equity securities (gains)/losses, net		(10,271	)		579			(2,040	)
	Debt securities losses/(gains), net		75,900			(1	)		(18,708	)
	Net losses/(gains) on disposals of fixed assets		2,928			566			(589	)
	Net (increase)/decrease in:
	Trading securities		(97,317	)		(455,467	)		(187,525	)
	Loans held for sale		1,550,690			752,283			(2,206,757	)
	Capital markets receivables		(220,774	)		(235,210	)		321,123
	Interest receivable		(23,125	)		(58,610	)		(19,528	)
	Other assets		(361,868	)		(751,092	)		(724,706	)
	Net increase/(decrease) in:
	Capital markets payables		208,162			201,004			(314,578	)
	Interest payable		33,988			50,736			12,504
	Other liabilities		41,824			(124,468	)		116,563
	Trading liabilities		(3,681	)		367,295			298,625

	Total adjustments		1,163,170			396,971			(2,155,176	)

	Net cash provided/(used) by operating activities		1,626,084			821,668			(1,709,468	)

Investing	Maturities of held to maturity securities		115			60			589
Activities	Available for sale securities:
	Sales		2,964,978			67,729			1,298,485
	Maturities		679,456			481,028			415,647
	Purchases		(4,590,153	)		(830,539	)		(1,920,053	)
	Premises and equipment:
	Sales		50			744			1,048
	Purchases		(100,263	)		(95,661	)		(78,763	)
	Net increase in loans		(1,639,761	)		(4,204,240	)		(2,521,454	)
	Net increase in investment in bank time deposits		(7,350	)		(5,358	)		(4,831	)
	Proceeds from divestitures, net of cash and cash equivalents		293,845			19,100			7,000
	Acquisitions, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired		(487	)		(841,950	)		—

	Net cash used by investing activities		(2,399,570	)		(5,409,087	)		(2,802,332	)

Financing	Common stock:
Activities	Exercise of stock options		57,082			41,289			67,935
	Cash dividends paid		(223,386	)		(214,024	)		(198,495	)
	Repurchase of shares		(165,572	)		(488	)		(184,224	)
	Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements		3,592			2,454			12,156
	Long-term debt:
	Issuance		2,804,057			1,923,750			1,506,605
	Payments		(412,769	)		(1,074,555	)		(610,585	)
	Issuance of preferred stock of subsidiary		—			295,400			—
	Net increase/(decrease) in:
	Deposits		(3,224,535	)		3,597,156			3,910,748
	Short-term borrowings		1,682,553			1,127,558			173,365

	Net cash provided by financing activities		521,022			5,698,540			4,677,505

	Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents		(252,464	)		1,111,121			165,705

	Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,431,620			1,320,499			1,154,794

	Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$ 2,179,156			$2,431,620			$ 1,320,499

	Cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations at beginning of period, included above		$ 874			$ 1,115			$ —
	Cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations at end of period, included above		—			874			1,115
	Total interest paid		1,296,324			804,574			297,089
	Total income taxes paid		115,930			200,176			182,255

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Accounting. The consolidated financial statements of First Horizon National Corporation (FHN), including its subsidiaries, have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and could differ from actual results.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FHN and other entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. Variable Interest Entities (VIE) for which FHN or a subsidiary has been determined to be the primary beneficiary are also consolidated. Affiliates for which FHN is not considered the primary beneficiary and that FHN does not have a controlling financial interest in are accounted for by the equity method. These investments are included in other assets, and FHN’s proportionate share of income or loss is included in noninterest income. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. For purposes of comparability, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Business combinations accounted for as purchases are included in the financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.

Revenue Recognition . FHN derives a significant portion of its revenues from fee based services. Noninterest income from transaction based fees is generally recognized when the transactions are completed. Noninterest income from service based fees is generally recognized over the period in which FHN provides the service.

Deposit Transactions and Cash Management. Deposit transactions include services related to retail deposit products (such as service charges on checking accounts), cash management products and services such as electronic transaction processing (automated clearing house and Electronic Data Interchange), account reconciliation services, cash vault services, lockbox processing, and information reporting to large corporate clients.

Insurance Commissions. Insurance commissions are derived from the sale of insurance products, including acting as an independent agent to provide commercial and personal property and casualty, life, long-term care, and disability insurance.

Trust Services and Investment Management. Trust services and investment management fees include investment management, personal trust, employee benefits, and custodial trust services.

Statements of Cash Flows . For purposes of these statements, cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, and securities purchased under agreements to resell are considered cash and cash equivalents. Federal funds are usually sold for one-day periods, and securities purchased under agreements to resell are short-term, highly liquid investments.

Trading Activities. Securities purchased in connection with underwriting or dealer activities (long positions) are carried at market value as trading securities. Gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, on these securities are reflected in capital markets noninterest income. Trading liabilities include securities that FHN has sold to other parties but does not own (short positions). FHN is obligated to purchase securities at a future date to cover the short positions. Assets and liabilities for unsettled trades are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Condition as “Capital markets receivables” or “Capital markets payables”. Retained interests, in the form of interest-only and principal-only strips, and subordinated securities from securitizations of first-lien mortgages are recognized at fair value as trading securities with gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, recognized in mortgage banking income. Retained interests, in the form of certificated residual interests from the securitization of second-lien mortgages and home equity lines of credit (HELOC) are recognized at fair value as trading securities with gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, recognized in revenue from loans sales and securitizations.

Investment Securities. Securities that FHN has the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity are classified as securities held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The amortized cost of all securities is adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount to maturity, or earlier call date if appropriate, using the level yield method. Such amortization and accretion is included in interest income from

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

securities. Investment securities are reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of each individual investment such as the degree of loss, the length of time the fair value has been below cost, the expectation for that security’s performance, the creditworthiness of the issuer and FHN’s intent and ability to hold the security. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are determined by the specific identification method and reported in noninterest income.

Securities that may be sold prior to maturity and equity securities are classified as securities available for sale and are carried at fair value. The unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale are excluded from earnings and are reported, net of tax, as a component of other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. Venture capital investments for which there are not active market quotes are initially valued at cost. Subsequently, these investments are adjusted to reflect changes in valuation as a result of public offerings or other-than-temporary declines in value.

Securities Purchased under Resale Agreements and Securities Sold under Repurchase Agreements. FHN enters into short-term purchases of securities under agreements to resell which are accounted for as collateralized financings except where FHN does not have an agreement to sell the same or substantially the same securities before maturity at a fixed or determinable price. Securities delivered under these transactions are delivered to either the dealer custody account at the Federal Reserve Bank or to the applicable counterparty. Collateral is valued daily and FHN may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged when appropriate.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are offered to cash management customers as an automated, collateralized investment account. Securities sold are also used by the retail/commercial bank to obtain favorable borrowing rates on its purchased funds.

Loans Held for Sale and Securitization and Residual Interests . FHN’s mortgage lenders originate first-lien mortgage loans (the warehouse) for the purpose of selling them in the secondary market, primarily through proprietary and agency securitizations, and to a lesser extent through loan sales. In addition, FHN evaluates its liquidity position in conjunction with determining its ability and intent to hold loans for the foreseeable future and sells certain of the second-lien mortgages and HELOC it produces in the secondary market through securitizations and loan sales. Loan securitizations involve the transfer of the loans to qualifying special purposes entities (QSPE) that are not subject to consolidation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities” (SFAS No. 140). FHN generally retains the right to service the transferred loans.

Loans held for sale include loans originated or purchased for resale, together with mortgage loans previously sold which may be unilaterally called by FHN. Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. The carrying value of loans held for sale is net of deferred origination fees and costs. Net origination fees and costs are deferred on loans held for sale and included in the basis of the loans in calculating gains and losses upon sale. Also included in the basis of first-lien mortgage loans is the value accreted during the time that the loan was a locked commitment. The cost basis of loans qualifying for fair value hedge accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS No. 133), is adjusted to reflect changes in fair value. Gains and losses realized from the sale of these assets, whether sold directly or through securitization, and adjustments to fair value are included in noninterest income.

Mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and mortgage loans guaranteed by the Veterans Administration (VA) are generally securitized through the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). Conforming conventional loans are generally securitized through government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC). In addition, FHN has completed proprietary securitizations of nonconforming first-lien and second-lien mortgages and HELOC, which do not conform to the requirements for sale or securitization through government agencies or GSE. Most of these securitizations are accounted for as sales; those that do not qualify for sale treatment are accounted for as financing arrangements.

Interests retained from the sales include mortgage servicing rights (MSR) and various financial assets. Prior to 2006, all of these retained interests were initially valued by allocating the total cost basis of the loan between the security or loan sold and the retained interests based on their relative fair values at the time of securitization or sale. The retained interests, other than MSR, are carried at fair value as a component of trading securities on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of noninterest income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. With the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Statement No. 140” (SFAS No. 156), MSR are initially valued at fair value, and the remaining retained interests are initially valued by allocating the remaining cost basis of the loan between the security or loan sold and the remaining retained interests based on their relative fair values at the time of securitization or sale. All retained interests, including MSR, are carried at fair value. The financial assets retained are included as a component of trading securities on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of noninterest income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Financial assets retained in a securitization may include certificated residual interests, excess interest (structured as interest-only strips), interest-only strips, principal-only strips, or subordinated bonds. Residual interests represent rights to receive earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the underlying loans. Excess interest represents rights to receive interest from serviced assets that exceed contractually specified rates. Principal-only strips are principal cash flow tranches, and interest-only strips are interest cash flow tranches. Subordinated bonds are bonds with junior priority. All financial assets retained from a securitization are recognized on the balance sheet in trading securities at fair value.

The fair values of the certificated residual interests, the excess interest, and the interest-only strips are determined using market prices from closely comparable assets such as MSR that are tested against prices determined using a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future cash flows. To determine the fair value of the principal-only strips, FHN uses the market prices from comparable assets such as publicly traded FNMA trust principal-only strips that are adjusted to reflect the relative risk difference between readily marketable securities and privately issued securities. The fair value of subordinated bonds is determined using a spread to an interpolated Treasury rate, which is supplied by broker dealers. The fair value of these retained interests typically changes based on changes in the discount rate and differences between modeled prepayment speeds and credit losses and actual experience.

On January 1, 2006, FHN began initially recognizing all classes of MSR at fair value and elected to irrevocably continue application of fair value accounting to its MSR. Classes of MSR are determined in accordance with FHN’s risk management practices and market inputs used in determining the fair value of the servicing asset. Since sales of MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair value of MSR. As such, like other participants in the mortgage banking business, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant risk characteristics of MSR such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age (new, seasoned, or moderate), agency type and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that it believes are comparable to those used by brokers and other service providers. FHN also periodically compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions with brokers, service providers, and recent market activity and against its own experience.

Prior to 2006, MSR were initially valued by allocating the total carrying value of the loan between the loan, MSR and other retained interests based on their relative fair values, and were thereafter valued at the lower of cost or fair value. MSR were amortized over the period of and in proportion to the estimated net servicing revenues. The cost basis of MSR qualifying for SFAS No. 133 fair value hedge accounting was adjusted to reflect changes in fair value. MSR were periodically evaluated for impairment. Impairment occurred when the current fair value of the servicing right was less than its recorded value. A quarterly value impairment analysis was performed using a discounted cash flow analysis which was disaggregated by strata representing predominant risk characteristics, including fixed rate and adjustable loans. Impairment, if any, was recognized through a valuation allowance for individual strata. However, if the impairment was determined to be other than temporary, a direct write-off of the asset was made. With the adoption of SFAS No. 156, MSR are valued at fair value, both initially and prospectively; impairment tests are no longer performed.

Loans. Loans are stated at principal amounts outstanding, net of unearned income. Interest on loans is recognized on an accrual basis at the applicable interest rate on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and direct costs as well as premiums and discounts are amortized as level yield adjustments over the respective loan terms. Unamortized net fees or costs are recognized upon early repayment of the loans. Loan commitment fees are generally deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period. Impaired loans are generally carried on a nonaccrual status. Loans are ordinarily placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s opinion, the collection of principal or interest is unlikely, the loan has been classified as “doubtful”, or when the collection of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due. Accrued but uncollected interest is reversed and charged against interest income when the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. On retail loans, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed when the loan is fully or partially charged off. Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when the estimated net realizable value of collateral is sufficient to recover the principal balance and accrued interest. Interest payments received on nonaccrual and impaired loans are normally applied to principal. Once all principal has been received, additional interest payments are recognized on a cash basis as interest income.

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Allowance for Loan Losses . The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management determines is adequate to absorb estimated probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation process to determine the adequacy of the allowance utilizes an analytical model based on historical loss experience, adjusted for current events, trends and economic conditions. The actual amounts realized could differ in the near term from the amounts assumed in arriving at the allowance for loan losses reported in the financial statements.

All losses of principal are charged to the allowance for loan losses in the period in which the loan is deemed to be uncollectible. Additions are made to the allowance through periodic provisions charged to current operations and recovery of principal on loans previously charged off.

Premises and Equipment. Premises and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization and include additions that materially extend the useful lives of existing premises and equipment. All other maintenance and repair expenditures are expensed as incurred. Gains and losses on dispositions are reflected in noninterest income and expense.

Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets and are recorded as noninterest expense. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease periods or the estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Useful lives utilized in determining depreciation for furniture, fixtures and equipment and buildings are three to fifteen and seven to forty-five years, respectively.

Real Estate Acquired by Foreclosure. Prior to 2006, properties acquired by foreclosure in compliance with HUD servicing guidelines were classified as receivables in “Other Assets” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Beginning in 2006, these properties are included in “Real estate acquired by foreclosure” and are carried at the estimated amount of the underlying government insurance or guarantee. On December 31, 2006, FHN had $18.1 million in these foreclosed properties. All other real estate acquired by foreclosure consists of properties that have been acquired in satisfaction of debt. These properties are carried at the lower of the outstanding loan amount or estimated fair value less estimated cost to sell the real estate. Losses arising at foreclosure are charged to the appropriate reserve. Required developmental costs associated with foreclosed property under construction are capitalized and included in determining the estimated net realizable value of the property, which is reviewed periodically, and any write-downs are charged against current earnings.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of “Other intangible assets” and “Goodwill.” The “Other intangible assets” represents identified intangible assets, including customer lists, acquired contracts, covenants not to compete and premium on purchased deposits, which are amortized over their estimated useful lives, except for those assets related to deposit bases that are primarily amortized over 10 years. Management evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining useful life or carrying value of amortizing intangibles should be revised. “Goodwill” represents the excess of cost over net assets of acquired subsidiaries less identifiable intangible assets. On an annual basis, FHN tests goodwill for impairment. For the three year period ended December 31, 2006, impairment of “Other intangible assets” or “Goodwill” recognized was immaterial to FHN.

Derivative Financial Instruments. FHN accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended (SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 requires recognition of all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value through adjustments to either accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity or current earnings. Fair value is defined as the amount FHN would receive or pay in the market to replace the derivatives as of the valuation date. Fair value is determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.

FHN prepares written hedge documentation, identifying the risk management objective and designating the derivative instrument as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or free-standing derivative instrument entered into as an economic hedge or to meet customers’ needs. All transactions designated as SFAS No. 133 hedges must be assessed at inception and on an ongoing basis as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. For a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability are recognized currently in earnings. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent that it is effective, is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

income and subsequently reclassified to earnings as the hedged transaction impacts net income. Any ineffective portion of a cash flow hedge is recognized currently in earnings. For free-standing derivative instruments, changes in fair values are recognized currently in earnings. See Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements for additional information.

Cash flows from derivative contracts are reported as operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Advertising and Public Relations. Advertising and public relations costs are generally expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes. FHN accounts for income taxes using the liability method pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (SFAS No. 109). Under this method, FHN’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined by applying the applicable federal and state income tax rates to its cumulative temporary differences. These temporary differences represent differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the corresponding tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. Deferred taxes are provided as a result of such temporary differences.

FHN and its eligible subsidiaries are included in a consolidated federal income tax return. FHN files separate returns for subsidiaries that are not eligible to be included in a consolidated federal income tax return. Based on the laws of the applicable state where it conducts business operations, FHN either files consolidated, combined or separate returns.

FHN’s federal and state income tax returns are subject to examination by governmental authorities. Various examinations are currently in progress. FHN believes that the resolution of both the examinations in progress and the examination of years not currently in progress will not have a significant impact on FHN’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Earnings per Share. Earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for each period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares adjusted to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares resulting from options granted under FHN’s stock option plans and deferred compensation arrangements had been issued. FHN utilizes the treasury stock method in this calculation.

Equity Compensation. FHN accounts for its employee stock-based compensation plans using the grant date fair value of an award to determine the expense to be recognized over the life of the award. For awards with service vesting criteria, expense is recognized using the straight-line method over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period) and is adjusted for anticipated forfeitures. For awards vesting based on a performance measure, anticipated performance is projected to determine the number of awards expected to vest, and the corresponding aggregate expense is adjusted to reflect the elapsed portion of the performance period. The fair value of equity awards with cash payout requirements, as well as awards for which fair value cannot be estimated at grant date, is remeasured each reporting period through vesting date.

For all stock option awards granted prior to adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123-R), FHN permits vesting of the option to continue after retirement. To account for these stock option awards, FHN uses the nominal vesting period approach. Under the nominal vesting period approach, awards granted to employees near retirement eligibility are expensed over the option’s normal vesting period until an employee’s actual retirement date, at which point all remaining unamortized compensation expense is immediately accelerated. Awards granted after the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R are amortized using the nonsubstantive vesting methodology. The nonsubstantive vesting methodology requires that expense associated with options that continue vesting after retirement be recognized over a period ending no later than an employee’s retirement eligibility date. Had FHN followed the nonsubstantive vesting period method for all awards previously granted, the effect of the change in expense attribution on earnings and per share amounts would have been negligible.

Accounting Changes. Effective December 31, 2006, FHN adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (SFAS No. 158), which requires the recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the statements of condition. SFAS No. 158 does not change measurement or recognition requirements for periodic pension and postretirement costs. SFAS No. 158 also provides that changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan should be

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

recognized in the year such changes occur through comprehensive income. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 requires that, by 2008, the annual measurement date of a plan’s assets and liabilities be as of the date of the financial statements. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 158, unrecognized transition assets and obligations, unrecognized actuarial gains and losses, and unrecognized prior service costs and credits were recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income resulting in a reduction in equity of $76.7 million, net of tax.

In fiscal 2006, FHN adopted SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 requires that registrants assess the impact on both the statement of condition and the statement of income when quantifying and evaluating the materiality of a misstatement. Under SAB No. 108, adjustment of financial statements is required when either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that is material to a reporting period presented within the financial statements, after considering all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. The adoption of SAB No. 108 had no effect on FHN’s statement of condition or results of operations.

Effective January 1, 2006, FHN elected early adoption of SFAS No. 156. This amendment to SFAS No. 140 requires servicing rights be initially measured at fair value. Subsequently, companies are permitted to elect, on a class-by-class basis, either fair value or amortized cost accounting for their servicing rights. FHN elected fair value accounting for its MSR. Accordingly, FHN recognized the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle totaling $.2 million, net of tax, representing the excess of the fair value of the servicing asset over the recorded value on January 1, 2006.

FHN also adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (SFAS No. 154), as of January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application of voluntary changes in accounting principle. A change in accounting principle mandated by new accounting pronouncements should follow the transition method specified by the new guidance. However, if transition guidance is not otherwise specified, retrospective application will be required. SFAS No. 154 does not alter the accounting requirement for changes in estimates (prospective) and error corrections (restatement). The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not affect FHN’s reported results of operations.

FHN adopted SFAS No. 123-R as of January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123-R requires recognition of expense over the requisite service period for awards of share-based compensation to employees. The grant date fair value of an award will be used to measure the compensation expense to be recognized over the life of the award. For unvested awards granted prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the fair values utilized equal the values developed in preparation of the disclosures required under the original SFAS No. 123. Compensation expense recognized after adoption of SFAS No. 123-R incorporates an estimate of awards expected to ultimately vest, which requires estimation of forfeitures as well as projections related to the satisfaction of performance conditions that determine vesting. As permitted by SFAS No. 123-R, FHN retroactively applied the provisions of SFAS No. 123-R to its prior period financial statements. The Consolidated Statements of Income were revised to incorporate expenses previously presented in the footnote disclosures. The Consolidated Statements of Condition were revised to reflect the effects of including equity compensation expense in those prior periods. Additionally, all deferred compensation balances were reclassified within equity to capital surplus. Since FHN’s prior disclosures included forfeitures as they occurred, a cumulative effect adjustment, as required by SFAS No. 123-R, of $1.1 million net of tax, was made for unvested awards that are not expected to vest due to anticipated forfeiture. The following table summarizes the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123-R on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, which prior to 2006 reflected compensation expense determined in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”:


	Years Ended December 31

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)	2006			2005			2004

Pre-tax income		$(12,718	)		$(21,224	)		$(13,871	)
Net income from continuing operations		(7,926	)		(13,303	)		(8,700	)
Net income		(6,831	)		(13,303	)		(8,700	)

Earnings per common share from continuing operations		$ (.06	)		$ (.11	)		$ (.07	)
Earnings per common share		(.05	)		(.11	)		(.07	)
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations		(.06	)		(.11	)		(.07	)
Diluted earnings per common share		(.05	)		(.11	)		(.07	)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Effective December 31, 2005, FHN adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires recognition of a liability at the time of acquisition or construction for assets that will require certain remediation expenditures when the assets are removed from service. FIN 47 clarified that future expenses to remove asbestos from buildings should be estimated and accrued as a liability at the time of acquisition with an offset to increase the cost of the associated structure. FHN currently owns certain buildings that contain asbestos. As a result of adopting FIN 47, FHN recognized a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle equaling $3.1 million, net of tax. FHN increased the value of its recorded tangible assets by $4.5 million at the time it recognized an associated conditional retirement obligation in the amount of $9.4 million.

Effective January 1, 2005, FHN adopted AICPA Statement of Position 03-3, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer” (SOP 03-3), which modifies the accounting for certain loans that are acquired with evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination. SOP 03-3 does not apply to loans recorded at fair value, revolving loans or mortgage loans classified as held for sale. SOP 03-3 limits the yield that may be accreted on applicable loans to the excess of the cash flows expected, at acquisition, to be collected over the investor’s initial investment in the loan. SOP 03-3 also prohibits the “carrying over” of valuation allowances on applicable loans. The impact of adopting SOP 03-3 was immaterial to the results of operations.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (FSP FAS 115-1), which supercedes the previously deferred recognition guidance of EITF Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (EITF 03-1). FSP FAS 115-1 was effective January 1, 2006, and references previously existing GAAP. Therefore, adoption of FSP FAS 115-1 did not impact FHN’s accounting for other-than-temporary impairment of investments. Effective July 1, 2004, FHN adopted the remaining provisions of EITF 03-1, including guidance for measuring and disclosing impairments of marketable securities and cost method investments. Adoption of these requirements did not have a material effect on the results of operations.

On July 1, 2004, FHN adopted FASB Staff Position FAS 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (FSP FAS 106-2). FSP FAS 106-2 requires a plan sponsor to determine if benefits offered through a postretirement health care plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. If benefits are determined to be actuarially equivalent, the resulting effect on the plan’s obligations should be reflected as an actuarial gain in determining the plan’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. The impact of adopting FSP FAS 106-2 was immaterial to FHN.

In April 2004, FHN adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments” (SAB No. 105). SAB No. 105 prohibits the inclusion of estimated servicing cash flows and internally-developed intangible assets within the valuation of interest rate lock commitments under SFAS No. 133. SAB No. 105 also requires disclosure of a registrant’s methods of accounting for interest rate lock commitments recognized under SFAS No. 133 and associated hedging strategies, if applicable. SAB No. 105 was effective for disclosures and interest rate lock commitments initiated after March 31, 2004. The adoption of SAB No. 105 resulted in an accounting change in 2004 and lowered pre-tax earnings by $8.4 million. However, the ongoing economic value of FHN’s business was not affected.

On March 31, 2004, FHN adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” (FIN 46-R), which clarified certain aspects of FIN 46. Upon adoption of FIN 46-R, FHN reassessed certain of its nonconsolidated interests as VIE but did not meet the criteria of primary beneficiary and, therefore, did not consolidate or deconsolidate any VIE, and accordingly, it did not have a material impact on FHN’s financial position or results of operations. See Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements for additional information.

Accounting Changes Issued but Not Currently Effective. In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” (SFAS No. 155), which permits fair value remeasurement for hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. Additionally, SFAS No. 155 clarifies the accounting guidance for beneficial interests in securitizations. Under SFAS No. 155, all beneficial interests in a securitization will require an assessment in accordance with SFAS No. 133 to determine if an embedded derivative exists within the instrument. In January 2007, the FASB issued Derivatives Implementation Group Issue B 40, “Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized Interests in Prepayable Financial Assets” (DIG B40). DIG B40 provides an exemption from the embedded derivative test of paragraph 13(b) of SFAS No. 133 for instruments that would otherwise require bifurcation if the test is met solely because of a prepayment feature included within the securitized interest and prepayment is not controlled by the security holder. SFAS No. 155 and DIG B40 are effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Since FHN presents all retained interests in its proprietary securitizations as trading securities and due to the clarifying guidance of DIG B40, FHN does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 to be significant to the results of operations.

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS No. 159), which allows an irrevocable election to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with unrealized gains and losses recognized currently in earnings. Under SFAS No. 159, the fair value option may only be elected at the time of initial recognition of a financial asset or financial liability or upon the occurrence of certain specified events. Additionally, SFAS No. 159 provides that application of the fair value option must be based on the fair value of an entire financial asset or financial liability and not selected risks inherent in those assets or liabilities. SFAS No. 159 requires that assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value pursuant to the fair value option be reported in the financial statements in a manner that separates those fair values from the carrying amounts of similar assets and liabilities which are measured using another measurement attribute. SFAS No. 159 also provides expanded disclosure requirements regarding the effects of electing the fair value option on the financial statements. SFAS No. 159 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years in which interim financial statements have not been issued, provided that all of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 are early adopted as well. FHN is currently assessing the financial impact of adopting SFAS No. 159.

Note 2 - Acquisitions/Divestitures

On June 28, 2006, First Horizon Merchant Services, Inc. (FHMS) sold all of the outstanding capital stock of Global Card Services, Inc. (GCS), a wholly-owned subsidiary. As a result, tax benefits of $4.2 million were recognized associated with the difference between FHMS’ tax basis in the stock and net proceeds from the sale.

On March 1, 2006, FHN sold substantially all the assets of its national merchant processing business conducted primarily through FHMS and GCS. The sale was to NOVA Information Systems (NOVA), a wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $340 million. In addition, a supplement to the purchase price may be paid to FHN if certain performance goals are achieved during a period following closing. This divestiture was accounted for as a discontinued operation, and prior periods were adjusted to exclude the impact of merchant operations from the results of continuing operations. In conjunction with the sale, FHN entered into a transitional service agreement with NOVA to provide or continue on-going services such as telecommunications, back-end processing and disaster recovery until NOVA converts the operations to their systems.

On December 9, 2005, First Tennessee Bank National Association (FTBNA) sold three financial centers in Dyersburg, Tennessee, to First South Bank. This transaction resulted in a divestiture gain of $7.0 million. Immediately preceding the sale, the financial centers had loans of approximately $80 million and deposits of approximately $70 million.

On August 26, 2005, FHN acquired West Metro Financial Services Inc. (West Metro), a Georgia bank holding company. West Metro was merged with and into FHN. At the same time West Metro’s subsidiary, First National Bank West Metro, with total assets of approximately $135 million, loans of approximately $115 million, and deposits of approximately $120 million, was merged with and into FTBNA. Total consideration of $32 million, consisting of approximately $11 million in cash and $21 million in FHN shares (approximately 518,000 shares of common stock), exceeded the estimated fair value of tangible assets and liabilities acquired by approximately $16 million. Intangible assets totaling approximately $3 million have been identified and are being amortized over their expected useful lives. The acquisition was immaterial to FHN.

On April 1, 2005, FTBNA acquired substantially all of the assets of MSAver Resources, L.L.C. of Overland Park, Kansas, a national leader in administering health savings accounts. The acquisition was immaterial to FHN.

On March 1, 2005, First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, a subsidiary of FTBNA, acquired Greenwich Home Mortgage Corporation of Cedar Knolls, New Jersey, for an initial payment of approximately $7.8 million in cash and FHN common stock. Net assets purchased, combined with the operating performance of the acquired business, will impact future payments owed to the sellers. The acquisition was immaterial to FHN. In 2006, additional payments of approximately $1.1 million in cash and FHN common stock were made.

On January 7, 2005, FHN’s capital markets division, FTN Financial, completed the acquisition of the assets and operations of the fixed income business of Spear, Leeds & Kellogg (SLK), a division of Goldman Sachs & Co. for approximately $150.0 million in cash. Total consideration paid exceeded the estimated fair value of tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities acquired by approximately $97 million. Intangible assets totaling approximately $55 million have been identified and are being amortized over their expected useful lives. The acquisition was immaterial to FHN.

On December 31, 2004, Synaxis Group, Inc., a subsidiary of FTBNA, completed the sale of substantially all the assets of Mann, Smith & Cummings, Inc. of Clarksville, TN. This transaction resulted in a divestiture gain of $1.2 million.

On September 23, 2004, FTN Midwest Securities Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of FTBNA, acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Alterity Partners, LLC, a mergers and acquisitions advisory services company based in New York, New York, for approximately $8.0 million in cash. The acquisition was immaterial to FHN.

On June 29, 2004, FHMS recognized a gain of $1.8 million resulting from the sale of certain merchant relationships to Humboldt Merchant Services, LP, of Eureka, California (an affiliate of First National Bank of Nevada, Reno, Nevada).

In addition to the acquisitions and divestitures mentioned above, FHN acquires or divests assets from time to time in transactions that are considered business combinations or divestitures but are not material to FHN individually or in the aggregate.

Note 3 - Investment Securities

The following tables summarize FHN’s securities held to maturity and available for sale on December 31, 2006 and 2005:


	On December 31, 2006*

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

Securities held to maturity:
States and municipalities	$	269	$	3	$	—		$	272

Total securities held to maturity	$	269	$	3	$	—		$	272


Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasuries	$	50,346	$	32	$	(15	)	$	50,363
Government agency issued MBS**		1,729,025		8,795		(1,968	)		1,735,852
Government agency issued CMO**		1,601,391		8,226		(4,605	)		1,605,012
Other U.S. government agencies**		246,066		204		(1,130	)		245,140
States and municipalities		1,500		—		—			1,500
Other		7,927		1		(37	)		7,891
Equity		242,837		1,576		(20	)		244,393

Total securities available for sale	$	3,879,092	$	18,834	$	(7,775	)	$	3,890,151

*	Includes $3.6 billion of securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes.
**	Includes securities issued by government sponsored entities which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.


	On December 31, 2005*

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

Securities held to maturity:
States and municipalities	$	383	$	7	$	—		$	390

Total securities held to maturity	$	383	$	7	$	—		$	390


Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasuries	$	41,190	$	5	$	(82	)	$	41,113
Government agency issued MBS**		920,105		319		(27,765	)		892,659
Government agency issued CMO**		1,667,312		985		(35,091	)		1,633,206
Other U.S. government agencies**		136,341		—		(2,423	)		133,918
States and municipalities		2,115		27		—			2,142
Other		9,209		9		(50	)		9,168
Equity		200,422		51		(576	)		199,897

Total securities available for sale	$	2,976,694	$	1,396	$	(65,987	)	$	2,912,103

*	Includes $2.5 billion of securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes.
**	Includes securities issued by government sponsored entities which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

Note 3 - Investment Securities (continued)

Provided below are the amortized cost and fair value by contractual maturity for the securities portfolios on December 31, 2006:


	Held to Maturity				Available for Sale

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value

Within 1 year	$	—	$	—	$	62,651	$	62,680
After 1 year; within 5 years		269		272		1,505		1,484
After 5 years; within 10 years		—		—		241,683		240,730
After 10 years		—		—		—		—

Subtotal		269		272		305,839		304,894

Government agency issued MBS and CMO		—		—		3,330,416		3,340,864
Equity securities		—		—		242,837		244,393

Total	$	269	$	272	$	3,879,092	$	3,890,151

Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The table below provides information on realized gross gains and realized gross losses on sales from the available for sale portfolio for the years ended December 31:


(Dollars in thousands)	AFS Debt*		AFS Equity*		Total

2006
Gross gains on sales	$ 3,132		$11,258		$ 14,390
Gross losses on sales	(79,209	)	(813	)	(80,022	)

2005
Gross gains on sales	$ 1		$ 62		$ 63

2004
Gross gains on sales	$ 18,712		$ 6,593		$ 25,305
Gross losses on sales	(4	)	(653	)	(657	)

* AFS - Available for sale

Losses totaling $.2 million, $.6 million and $3.9 million for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were recognized for securities that, in the opinion of management, have been other-than-temporarily impaired. During 2006, $.2 million of recoveries were realized as gains on debt securities that had previously been written down.

Note 3 - Investment Securities (continued)

The following tables provide information on investments that have unrealized losses on December 31, 2006 and 2005:


	On December 31, 2006

	Less than 12 months			12 Months or Longer			Total

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value	Unrealized Losses		Fair Value	Unrealized Losses		Fair Value	Unrealized Losses

U.S. Treasuries	$ 100	$ —		$ 363	$ (15	)	$ 463	$ (15	)
Government agency issued MBS	516,073	(1,960	)	6,662	(8	)	522,735	(1,968	)
Government agency issued CMO	451,131	(764	)	151,273	(3,841	)	602,404	(4,605	)
Other U.S. government agencies	166,021	(234	)	28,976	(896	)	194,997	(1,130	)
Other	2,487	(1	)	2,086	(36	)	4,573	(37	)

Total debt securities	1,135,812	(2,959	)	189,360	(4,796	)	1,325,172	(7,755	)
Equity	138	(20	)	—	—		138	(20	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$1,135,950	$(2,979	)	$189,360	$(4,796	)	$1,325,310	$(7,775	)

The gross unrealized losses on December 31, 2006, principally related to U.S. Government agencies, were primarily caused by interest rate changes. FHN has reviewed these securities in accordance with its accounting policy for other-than-temporary impairment and does not consider them other-than-temporarily impaired. FHN has both the intent and ability to hold these securities for the time necessary to recover the amortized cost.


	On December 31, 2005

	Less than 12 months			12 Months or Longer			Total

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value	Unrealized Losses		Fair Value	Unrealized Losses		Fair Value	Unrealized Losses

U.S. Treasuries	$ 39,573	$ (66	)	$ 363	$ (16	)	$ 39,936	$ (82	)
Government agency issued MBS	294,513	(6,781	)	592,307	(20,984	)	886,820	(27,765	)
Government agency issued CMO	703,810	(13,805	)	744,792	(21,286	)	1,448,602	(35,091	)
Other U.S. government agencies	133,918	(2,423	)	—	—		133,918	(2,423	)
Other	7,650	(32	)	836	(18	)	8,486	(50	)

Total debt securities	1,179,464	(23,107	)	1,338,298	(42,304	)	2,517,762	(65,411	)
Equity	26,605	(576	)	—	—		26,605	(576	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$1,206,069	$(23,683	)	$1,338,298	$(42,304	)	$2,544,367	$(65,987	)

On December 31, 2006 and 2005, FHN had $163.9 million and $143.2 million, respectively, of cost method investments. These investments included Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock of $117.3 million and $108.2 million on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These investments, which do not have a readily determinable market and for which it is not practicable to estimate a fair value, are evaluated for impairment only if there are identified events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.

Note 4 - Loans

A summary of the major categories of loans outstanding on December 31 is shown below:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005

Commercial:
Commercial, financial and industrial		$ 7,201,009		$ 6,578,117
Real estate commercial		1,136,590		1,213,052
Real estate construction		2,753,458		2,108,121
Retail:
Real estate residential		7,973,313		8,368,219
Real estate construction		2,085,133		1,925,060
Other retail		161,178		168,413
Credit card receivables		203,307		251,016
Real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings		590,917		—

Loans, net of unearned income		22,104,905		20,611,998
Allowance for loan losses		216,285		189,705

Total net loans		$ 21,888,620		$ 20,422,293

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

On December 31, 2006, $2.9 billion of real estate residential qualifying loans were pledged to secure potential Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. Qualifying loans are comprised of residential mortgage loans secured by first and second liens and home equity lines of credit. In addition, $5.3 billion of commercial, financial and industrial loans were pledged to secure potential discount window borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank.

Nonperforming loans consist of loans which management has identified as impaired, other nonaccrual loans and loans which have been restructured. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, there were no outstanding commitments to advance additional funds to customers whose loans had been restructured. The following table presents nonperforming loans on December 31:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005

Impaired loans		$ 76,340		$ 36,635
Other nonaccrual loans*		17,290		15,624

Total nonperforming loans		$ 93,630		$ 52,259

*	On December 31, 2006 and 2005, other nonaccrual loans included $10.8 million and $11.5 million, respectively, of loans held for sale.

Interest income received during 2006 for impaired loans was $2.8 million and for other nonaccrual loans was $.4 million. Under their original terms, interest income would have been approximately $7.3 million for the impaired loans and $1.4 million for the other nonaccrual loans outstanding on December 31, 2006. Interest income received during 2005 for impaired loans was $.5 million and for other nonaccrual loans was $.1 million. Under their original terms, interest income would have been approximately $2.6 million for the impaired loans and $1.1 million for the other nonaccrual loans outstanding on December 31, 2005. Interest income received during 2004 for impaired loans was $.5 million and for other nonaccrual loans was $.1 million. Under their original terms, interest income would have been approximately $2.6 million for the impaired loans and $1.0 million for the other nonaccrual loans outstanding on December 31, 2004. The average balance of impaired loans was approximately $55.0 million for 2006, $36.3 million for 2005 and $36.9 million for 2004. All impaired loans have an associated allowance for loan loss.

Note 4 - Loans (continued)

Activity in the allowance for loan losses related to non-impaired and impaired loans for years ended December 31 is summarized as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	Non-impaired			Impaired			Total

Balance on December 31, 2003	$	149,153		$	11,180		$	160,333
Adjustment due to loans transferred to held for sale		(8,382	)		—			(8,382	)
Provision for loan losses		40,402			7,946			48,348
Charge-offs		(45,772	)		(10,857	)		(56,629	)
Recoveries		12,271			2,218			14,489

Net charge-offs		(33,501	)		(8,639	)		(42,140	)

Balance on December 31, 2004		147,672			10,487			158,159
Allowance from acquisitions		1,902			—			1,902
Adjustment due to divestiture		(516	)		—			(516	)
Provision for loan losses		61,799			5,879			67,678
Charge-offs		(41,963	)		(10,187	)		(52,150	)
Recoveries		10,741			3,891			14,632

Net charge-offs		(31,222	)		(6,296	)		(37,518	)

Balance on December 31, 2005		179,635			10,070			189,705
Provision for loan losses		50,541			32,588			83,129
Adjustment due to divestiture		(1,470	)		—			(1,470	)
Charge-offs		(37,512	)		(31,114	)		(68,626	)
Recoveries		9,633			3,914			13,547

Net charge-offs		(27,879	)		(27,200	)		(55,079	)

Balance on December 31, 2006	$	200,827		$	15,458		$	216,285

Included in other assets and in other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Condition are amounts due from customers on acceptances and bank acceptances outstanding of $7.7 million, $5.3 million, and $9.2 million on December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Retail real estate construction loans are a one-time close product where First Horizon Home Loans provides construction financing and a permanent mortgage to individuals for the purpose of constructing a home. Upon completion of construction, the permanent mortgage is classified as held for sale and sold into the secondary market. First Horizon Home Loans transferred approximately $1.6 billion, $1.1 billion and $.6 billion in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Additionally, FHN transferred approximately $.3 billion of real estate residential loans from held for sale into the loan portfolio in 2005, and in 2004, transferred approximately $1.6 billion of real estate residential loans to held for sale.

Note 5 - Premises, Equipment and Leases

Premises and equipment on December 31 are summarized below:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005

Land		$ 66,713		$ 58,210
Buildings		326,666		293,533
Leasehold improvements		84,227		76,074
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		331,291		316,010

Premises and equipment, at cost		808,897		743,827
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		357,189		335,288

Premises and equipment, net		$451,708		$408,539

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

FHN is obligated under a number of noncancelable operating leases for premises and equipment with terms up to 30 years, which may include the payment of taxes, insurance and maintenance costs.

Minimum future lease payments for noncancelable operating leases on premises and equipment on December 31, 2006, are shown below:


(Dollars in thousands)

2007									$ 69,263
2008									53,509
2009									35,810
2010									24,931
2011									16,051
2012 and after									53,075

Total minimum lease payments									$252,639

Payments required under capital leases are not material.

Aggregate minimum income under sublease agreements for these periods is $3.4 million.

Rent expense incurred under all operating lease obligations was as follows for the years ended December 31:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004

Rent expense, gross		$ 84,553			$ 83,427			$ 68,416
Sublease income		(3,556	)		(3,158	)		(3,217	)

Rent expense, net		$ 80,997			$ 80,269			$ 65,199

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Note 6 - Mortgage Servicing Rights

On January 1, 2006, FHN elected early adoption of SFAS No. 156, which requires servicing rights be initially measured at fair value. Subsequently, companies are permitted to elect, on a class-by-class basis, either fair value or amortized cost accounting for their servicing rights. Accordingly, FHN began initially recognizing all its classes of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) at fair value and elected to irrevocably continue application of fair value accounting to all its classes of MSR. Classes of MSR are determined in accordance with FHN’s risk management practices and market inputs used in determining the fair value of the servicing asset. FHN recognized the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle totaling $.2 million, net of tax, representing the excess of the fair value of the servicing asset over the recorded value on January 1, 2006. The balance of MSR included on the Consolidated Statements of Condition represents the rights to service approximately $102.2 billion of mortgage loans on December 31, 2006, for which a servicing right has been capitalized.

Since sales of MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair value of MSR. As such, like other participants in the mortgage banking business, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant risk characteristics of MSR, such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age (new, seasoned, or moderate), agency type and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that it believes are comparable to those used by brokers and other service providers. FHN also periodically compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions with brokers, service providers, and recent market activity and against its own experience.

Following is a summary of changes in capitalized MSR as of December 31, 2006:


(Dollars in thousands)	First Liens		Second Liens		HELOC

Fair value on January 1, 2006	$ 1,318,219		$ 5,470		$ 14,384
Addition of mortgage servicing rights	390,097		19,463		6,449
Reductions due to loan payments	(258,176	)	(4,640	)	(7,528	)
Changes in fair value due to:
Changes in current market interest rates	45,137		45		1,089
Changes in assumptions	—		3,122		8
Other changes in fair value	(62	)	631		234

Fair value on December 31, 2006	$1,495,215		$24,091		$14,636

In periods prior to 2006 these amounts were included at the lower of cost, net of accumulated amortization, or fair value. The cost basis of MSR qualifying for SFAS No. 133 fair value hedge accounting was adjusted to reflect changes in fair value. MSR were amortized over the period of and in proportion to the estimated net servicing revenues. MSR were periodically evaluated for impairment. Impairment occurred when the current fair value of the servicing right was less than its recorded value. A quarterly value impairment analysis was performed using a discounted cash flow analysis which was disaggregated by strata representing predominant risk characteristics, including fixed and adjustable rate loans. Impairment, if any, was recognized through a valuation allowance for individual strata. However, if the impairment was determined to be other than temporary, a direct write-off of the asset was made. With the adoption of SFAS No. 156, MSR are valued at fair value, both initially and prospectively; impairment tests are no longer performed. Following is a summary of changes in capitalized MSR as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:

Note 6 - Mortgage Servicing Rights (continued)


(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2003	$ 795,938
Addition of mortgage servicing rights	450,826
Amortization	(154,301	)
Market value adjustments	(18,943	)
Permanent impairment	(69,299	)
Decrease in valuation allowance	32,237

December 31, 2004	1,036,458
Addition of mortgage servicing rights	437,121
Amortization	(194,800	)
Market value adjustments	71,094
Permanent impairment	(38,239	)
Decrease in valuation allowance	2,995

December 31, 2005	$ 1,314,629

MSR on December 31, 2005 and 2004, had estimated market values of approximately $1,334.5 million and $1,049.7 million, respectively. These balances represent the rights to service approximately $93.7 billion and $83.6 billion of mortgage loans on December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, for which a servicing right was capitalized. The following is a rollforward of the valuation allowance required due to temporary impairment as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:


(Dollars in thousands)

Balance on December 31, 2003	$ 36,468
Permanent impairment	(69,299	)
Servicing valuation provision	37,062

Balance on December 31, 2004	4,231
Permanent impairment	(38,239	)
Servicing valuation provision	35,244

Balance on December 31, 2005	$ 1,236

Note 7 - Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, included in the Consolidated Statements of Condition:


(Dollars in thousands)	Goodwill			Other Intangible Assets*

December 31, 2003		$ 152,862		$ 24,375
Amortization expense		—		(6,157	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment		—		(129	)
Divestitures		(810	)	(359	)
Additions		8,015		4,790

December 31, 2004		160,067		22,520
Amortization expense		—		(10,700	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment		—		1,555
Divestitures		—		(633	)
Additions		121,373		63,905

December 31, 2005		281,440		76,647
Amortization expense		—		(11,462	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment		—		(1,657	)
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158		—		(804	)
Divestitures		(11,777	)	(4,318	)
Additions**		5,919		6,124

December 31, 2006		$275,582		$ 64,530

*	Represents customer lists, acquired contracts, premium on purchased deposits, covenants not to compete and assets related to the minimum pension liability.
**	Preliminary purchase price allocations on acquisitions are based upon estimates of fair value and are subject to change.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

The gross carrying amount of other intangible assets subject to amortization is $138.3 million on December 31, 2006, net of $73.8 million of accumulated amortization. Estimated aggregate amortization expense is expected to be $9.5 million, $7.9 million, $6.4 million, $5.9 million, and $5.7 million for the twelve-month periods of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

The following is a summary of goodwill detailed by reportable segments for the three years ended December 31, 2006:


(Dollars in thousands)	Retail/ Commercial Banking		Mortgage Banking	Capital Markets	Total

December 31, 2003	$ 87,580		$ 51,988	$ 13,294	$ 152,862
Divestitures	(810	)	—	—	(810	)
Additions	438		3,226	4,351	8,015

December 31, 2004	87,208		55,214	17,645	160,067
Additions	17,573		6,379	97,421	121,373

December 31, 2005	104,781		61,593	115,066	281,440
Divestitures	(11,777	)	—	—	(11,777	)
Additions*	1,272		4,647	—	5,919

December 31, 2006	$94,276		$66,240	$115,066	$275,582

*	Preliminary purchase price allocations on acquisitions are based upon estimates of fair value and are subject to change.

Note 8 - Time Deposit Maturities

Following is a table of maturities for time deposits outstanding on December 31, 2006, which include “Certificates of deposit under $100,000 and other time” and “Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more”. “Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more” totaled $6.5 billion on December 31, 2006. Time deposits are included in “Interest-bearing” deposits on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.


(Dollars in thousands)

2007			$ 7,507,176
2008			794,630
2009			651,701
2010			119,642
2011			87,295
2012 and after			281,235

Total			$ 9,441,679

Note 9 - Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings include federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper, trading liabilities and other borrowed funds.

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and commercial paper generally have maturities of less than 90 days. Trading liabilities, which represent short positions in securities, are generally held for less than 90 days. Other short-term borrowings have original maturities of one year or less. On December 31, 2006, capital markets trading securities with a fair value of $594.0 million were pledged to secure other short-term borrowings.

The detail of these borrowings for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004 is presented in the following table:


	Federal Funds
	Purchased and
	Securities Sold						Other
	Under Agreements		Commercial		Trading		Short-term
(Dollars in thousands)	to Repurchase		Paper		Liabilities		Borrowings

2006
Average balance	$4,562,953		$ 2,704		$1,338,872		$ 792,280
Year-end balance	4,961,799		5,619		789,957		1,252,894
Maximum month-end outstanding	6,000,299		5,619		1,542,381		1,252,894
Average rate for the year	4.58	%	2.29	%	5.68	%	5.05	%
Average rate at year-end	4.67		3.99		5.87		5.01

2005
Average balance	$ 4,582,178		$ 7,001		$ 1,519,337		$ 987,771
Year-end balance	3,735,742		10,695		793,638		791,322
Maximum month-end outstanding	5,458,983		26,466		1,663,319		1,339,531
Average rate for the year	2.98	%	1.50	%	5.28	%	3.57	%
Average rate at year-end	3.51		1.98		5.97		3.84

2004
Average balance	$ 3,685,153		$ 20,385		$ 527,032		$ 116,269
Year-end balance	3,247,048		23,712		426,343		116,064
Maximum month-end outstanding	4,387,946		30,885		900,233		189,683
Average rate for the year	1.22	%	.89	%	3.80	%	2.14	%
Average rate at year-end	1.87		1.18		3.52		1.37

On December 31, 2006, $50 million of borrowings under unsecured lines of credit from non-affiliated banks were available to the parent company to provide for general liquidity needs at an annual facility fee of .10 percent.

Note 10 – Long-Term Debt

The following table presents information pertaining to long-term debt (debt with original maturities greater than one year) for FHN and its subsidiaries on December 31:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005

First Tennessee Bank National Association:
Subordinated notes (qualifies for total capital under the Risk-Based Capital guidelines):
Matures on January 15, 2015 — 5.05%	$	387,289	$	392,279
Matures on May 15, 2013 — 4.625%		247,995		251,135
Matures on December 1, 2008 — 5.75%		137,575		136,847
Matures on April 1, 2008 — 6.40%		89,912		89,841
Matures on April 1, 2016 — 5.65%		251,116		—
Bank notes*		2,424,694		874,672
Extendible notes**
Final maturity of November 17, 2010 — 5.34% on December 31, 2006, and 4.36% on December 31, 2005		1,249,324		1,249,110
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings***		4,042		4,381
First Horizon National Corporation:
Subordinated capital notes (qualifies for total capital under the Risk-Based Capital guidelines):
Matures on May 15, 2013 — 4.50%		99,228		100,478
Subordinated notes (Note 11):
Matures on January 6, 2027 — 8.07%		102,478		99,737
Matures on April 15, 2034 — 6.30%		204,955		193,878
FT Real Estate Securities Company, Inc.
Cumulative preferred stock (qualifies for total capital under the Risk-Based Capital guidelines):
Matures on March 31, 2031 — 9.50%		45,353		45,285
First Horizon ABS Trust
Other collateralized borrowings****
Matures on October 25, 2034—5.48%		242,378		—
Matures on October 26, 2026—5.45%		350,021		—

Total	$	5,836,360	$	3,437,643

*	The bank notes were issued with variable interest rates and have remaining terms of 1 to 5 years. These bank notes had weighted average interest rates of 5.45 percent and 4.66 percent on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
**	On December 31, 2006, the extendible notes had a contractual maturity of January 17, 2008, but are extendible at the investors’ option to the final maturity date of November 17, 2010.
***	The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings were issued with fixed interest rates and have remaining terms of 3 to 23 years. These borrowings had weighted average interest rates of 3.21 percent and 3.40 percent on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
****	Secured by $590.9 million of retail real estate residential loans.

Annual principal repayment requirements as of December 31, 2006, are as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)

2007	$	150,341
2008		1,856,966
2009		1,195,324
2010		141
2011		705,141
2012 and after		1,951,432

All subordinated notes are unsecured and are subordinate to other present and future senior indebtedness. FTBNA’s subordinated notes and FHN’s subordinated capital notes qualify as Tier 2 capital under the risk-based capital guidelines. Prior to February 2005, FTBNA had a bank note program under which the bank was able to borrow funds from time to time at maturities of 30 days to 30 years. This bank note program was terminated in connection with the establishment of a new program. That termination did not affect any previously issued notes outstanding. In February 2005, FTBNA established a new bank note program providing additional liquidity of $5.0 billion. This bank note program provides FTBNA with a facility under which it may continuously issue and offer short- and medium-term unsecured notes. On December 31, 2006, $2.4 billion was available under current conditions through the bank note program.

Note 11 - Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in First Horizon’s Junior Subordinated Debentures

On December 30, 1996, FHN, through its underwriter, sold $100 million of capital securities. First Tennessee Capital I (Capital I), a Delaware business trust wholly owned by FHN, issued $100 million of Capital Securities, Series A at 8.07 percent. The proceeds were loaned to FHN as junior subordinated debt. FHN has, through various contractual arrangements, fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of Capital I’s obligations with respect to the capital securities. The sole asset of Capital I is $103 million of junior subordinated debentures issued by FHN. These junior subordinated debentures also carry an interest rate of 8.07 percent. Both the capital securities of Capital I and the junior subordinated debentures of FHN will mature on January 6, 2027; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity of both may be shortened to a date not earlier than January 6, 2017. The capital securities qualify as Tier 1 capital. The junior subordinated debentures are included in the Consolidated Statements of Condition in “Long-term debt” (see Note 10 – Long-Term Debt).

On March 29, 2004, FHN, through its underwriter, sold $200 million of capital securities. First Tennessee Capital II (Capital II), a Delaware business trust wholly owned by FHN, issued $200 million of Capital Securities, Series B at 6.30 percent. The proceeds were loaned to FHN as junior subordinated debt. FHN has, through various contractual arrangements, fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of Capital II’s obligations with respect to the capital securities. The sole asset of Capital II is $206 million of junior subordinated debentures issued by FHN. These junior subordinated debentures also carry an interest rate of 6.30 percent. Both the capital securities of Capital II and the junior subordinated debentures of FHN will mature on April 15, 2034; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity of both may be shortened to a date not earlier than April 15, 2009. The capital securities qualify as Tier 1 capital. The junior subordinated debentures are included in the Consolidated Statements of Condition in “Long-term debt” (see Note 10 – Long-Term Debt).

Note 12 - Preferred Stock of Subsidiary

On September 14, 2000, FT Real Estate Securities Company, Inc. (FTRESC), an indirect subsidiary of FHN, issued 50 shares of 9.50% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Class B (Class B Preferred Shares), with a liquidation preference of $1.0 million per share. An aggregate total of 47 Class B Preferred Shares have been sold privately to nonaffiliates. These securities qualify as Tier 2 capital and are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Condition as “Long-term debt”. FTRESC is a real estate investment trust (REIT) established for the purpose of acquiring, holding and managing real estate mortgage assets. Dividends on the Class B Preferred Shares are cumulative and are payable semi-annually.

The Class B Preferred Shares are mandatorily redeemable on March 31, 2031, and redeemable at the discretion of FTRESC in the event that the Class B Preferred Shares cannot be accounted for as Tier 2 regulatory capital or there is more than an insubstantial risk that dividends paid with respect to the Class B Preferred Shares will not be fully deductible for tax purposes. They are not subject to any sinking fund and are not convertible into any other securities of FTRESC, FHN or any of its subsidiaries. The shares are, however, automatically exchanged at the direction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for preferred stock of FTBNA, having substantially the same terms as the Class B Preferred Shares in the event FTBNA becomes undercapitalized, insolvent or in danger of becoming undercapitalized.

The following indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of FHN have also issued preferred stock. First Horizon Mortgage Loan Corporation has issued $1.0 million of Class B Preferred Shares. FHRIII, LLC and FHRIV, LLC have each issued $1.0 million of Class B Preferred Units. Additionally, FHTRS, Inc. has issued $310.1 million of Class A Preferred Shares. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, $.5 million of Class B Preferred Shares and Units that are perpetual in nature was recognized as “Preferred stock of subsidiary” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The remaining balance has been eliminated in consolidation.

On March 23, 2005, FTBNA issued 300,000 shares of Class A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (Class A Preferred Stock) with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. These securities qualify as Tier 1 capital. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, $294.8 million of Class A Preferred Stock was recognized as “Preferred stock of subsidiary” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

Note 13 - Regulatory Capital

FHN is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on FHN’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain derivatives as calculated under regulatory accounting practices must be met. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgment by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require FHN to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage). Management believes, as of December 31, 2006, that FHN met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.

The actual capital amounts and ratios of FHN and FTBNA are presented in the table below. In addition, FTBNA must also calculate its capital ratios after excluding financial subsidiaries as defined by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Based on this calculation FTBNA’s Total Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Leverage ratios were 12.12 percent, 8.37 percent and 6.77 percent, respectively, on December 31, 2006, and were 11.37 percent, 8.28 percent and 6.76 percent, respectively, on December 31, 2005.


	First Horizon National					First Tennessee Bank
	Corporation					National Association

(Dollars in thousands)	Amount			Ratio		Amount			Ratio

On December 31, 2006:
Actual:
Total Capital	$	4,016,429		13.21	%	$	3,814,595		12.65	%
Tier 1 Capital		2,696,287		8.87			2,595,153		8.60
Leverage		2,696,287		6.94			2,595,153		6.73

For Capital Adequacy Purposes:
Total Capital		2,432,430	>	8.00			2,412,784	>	8.00
Tier 1 Capital		1,216,215	>	4.00			1,206,392	>	4.00
Leverage		1,554,938	>	4.00			1,543,284	>	4.00

To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions:
Total Capital							3,015,980	>	10.00
Tier 1 Capital							1,809,588	>	6.00
Leverage							1,929,105	>	5.00

On December 31, 2005:
Actual:
Total Capital	$	3,614,717		12.42	%	$	3,472,094		11.72	%
Tier 1 Capital		2,524,254		8.67			2,481,632		8.38
Leverage		2,524,254		6.76			2,481,632		6.70

For Capital Adequacy Purposes:
Total Capital		2,328,950	>	8.00			2,370,356	>	8.00
Tier 1 Capital		1,164,475	>	4.00			1,185,178	>	4.00
Leverage		1,493,291	>	4.00			1,482,214	>	4.00

To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions:
Total Capital							2,962,945	>	10.00
Tier 1 Capital							1,777,767	>	6.00
Leverage							1,852,767	>	5.00

Note 14 - Other Income and Other Expense

Following is detail concerning “All other income and commissions” and “All other expense” as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004

All other income and commissions:
Brokerage management fees and commissions	$	37,182	$	30,865	$	28,590
Bankcard income		26,105		27,136		24,993
Bank-owned life insurance		19,064		16,335		12,842
Remittance processing		14,737		15,411		19,515
Deferred compensation		14,647		7,721		8,633
Other service charges		14,561		14,330		11,498
Letter of credit fees		7,271		7,883		6,793
ATM interchange fees		7,091		5,995		4,973
Reinsurance fees		6,792		5,850		5,913
Check clearing fees		6,385		7,333		10,052
Electronic banking fees		5,975		5,977		6,071
Federal flood certifications		4,996		9,359		5,375
Other		5,636		11,516		18,310

Total	$	170,442	$	165,711	$	163,558

All other expense:
Advertising and public relations	$	47,427	$	46,321	$	39,846
Legal and professional fees		43,012		43,734		36,730
Computer software		34,381		28,542		26,719
Travel and entertainment		32,306		31,022		29,914
Contract employment		27,420		30,344		23,722
Distributions on preferred stock of subsidiary		18,146		10,757		—
Low income housing expense		17,027		12,987		13,662
Supplies		15,072		17,290		17,185
Loan closing costs		12,095		7,969		18,623
Customer relations		8,688		9,868		9,167
Other insurance and taxes		8,615		9,349		8,744
Employee training and dues		6,917		6,268		5,956
Loan insurance expense		6,577		7,970		8,070
Fed service fees		6,543		7,568		8,838
Complimentary check expense		5,371		4,621		3,482
Foreclosed real estate		4,384		3,933		5,834
Bank examinations costs		4,367		3,958		3,128
Deposit insurance premium		3,198		3,012		3,024
Other		92,086		36,870		27,662

Total	$	393,632	$	322,383	$	290,306

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Note 15 - Components of Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income

Following is detail of “Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income” as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Condition:


							Accumulated
	Before-			Tax			Other
	Tax			(Expense)/			Comprehensive
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount			Benefit			(Loss)/Income

December 31, 2003							$	682
Other comprehensive income:
Minimum pension liability	$	(505	)	$	186			(319	)
Unrealized market adjustments on securities available for sale		3,961			(1,533	)		2,428
Adjustment for net gains included in net income		(20,748	)		8,029			(12,719	)

December 31, 2004	$	(17,292	)	$	6,682			(9,928	)

Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized market adjustments on cash flow hedge	$	(123	)	$	46			(77	)
Minimum pension liability		215			(79	)		136
Unrealized market adjustments on securities available for sale		(53,562	)		20,834			(32,728	)
Adjustment for net losses included in net income		578			(225	)		353

December 31, 2005	$	(52,892	)	$	20,576			(42,244	)

Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized market adjustments on cash flow hedge	$	684		$	(257	)		427
Minimum pension liability		(316	)		119			(197	)
Unrealized market adjustments on securities available for sale		10,021			(3,898	)		6,123
Adjustment for net losses included in net income		65,629			(25,528	)		40,101

Total other comprehensive income		76,018			(29,564	)		46,454
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158		(122,587	)		45,929			(76,658	)

December 31, 2006	$	(46,569	)	$	16,365		$	(72,448	)

Note 16 - Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense/(benefit) are as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005		2004

Current:
Federal		$ (3,965	)		$ 147,532		$ 157,890
State		(11,495	)		6,894		381
Deferred:
Federal		92,291			29,274		28,030
State		10,447			2,288		11,617

Total		$ 87,278			$ 185,988		$ 197,918

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

The effective tax rates for 2006, 2005 and 2004 were 25.82 percent, 31.17 percent and 31.52 percent, respectively. Income tax expense was different than the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes because of the following:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004

Federal income tax rate		35%			35%			35%

Tax computed at statutory rate		$ 118,328			$ 208,849			$ 219,795
Increase/(decrease) resulting from:
State income taxes		(681	)		5,971			7,807
Tax credits		(18,340	)		(17,937	)		(17,201	)
Other		(12,029	)		(10,895	)		(12,483	)

Total		$ 87,278			$ 185,988			$ 197,918

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

A deferred tax asset or liability is recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The tax consequence is calculated by applying enacted statutory tax rates, applicable to future years, to these temporary differences. Temporary differences which gave rise to deferred tax (assets)/liabilities on December 31, 2006 and 2005, were as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005

Deferred tax assets:
Loss reserves		$ (81,443	)		$ (74,376	)
Employee benefits		(111,827	)		(83,215	)
Accrued expenses		(9,033	)		(7,439	)
Investment in debt and equity securities		(27,311	)		(31,530	)
Other		(5,307	)		(4,600	)

Gross deferred tax assets		(234,921	)		(201,160	)

Deferred tax liabilities:
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights		502,861			392,087
Asset securitizations		14,709			8,861
Depreciation and amortization		49,435			45,603
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		14,774			13,494
Deferred fees and expenses		27,398			38,775
Other intangible assets		19,447			18,242
Other		16,442			12,276

Gross deferred tax liabilities		645,066			529,338

Net deferred tax liabilities		$ 410,145			$ 328,178

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

The deferred tax assets above are net of an immaterial valuation allowance due to capital losses. Other than these capital losses, no valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets has been recorded on December 31, 2006 and 2005, as management believes it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will be fully realized.

Note 17 - Earnings per Share

The following table shows a reconciliation of earnings per common share to diluted earnings per common share:


(In thousands, except per share data)	2006		2005			2004

Net income from continuing operations		$250,802		$410,723			$430,068
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		210,767		17,072			15,640
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		1,345		(3,098	)		—

Net income		$462,914		$424,697			$445,708


Weighted average common shares		124,453		125,475			124,730
Effect of dilutive securities		3,464		3,889			3,706

Diluted average common shares		127,917		129,364			128,436


Earnings per common share:
Net income from continuing operations		$ 2.02		$ 3.27			$ 3.45
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		1.69		.14			.12
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		0.01		(.03	)		—

Net income		$ 3.72		$ 3.38			$ 3.57


Diluted earnings per common share:
Net income from continuing operations		$ 1.96		$ 3.17			$ 3.35
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		1.65		.14			.12
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		0.01		(.03	)		—

Net income		$ 3.62		$ 3.28			$ 3.47

Outstanding stock options of 6,264, 4,105 and 2,808 with weighted average exercise prices of $42.51, $43.52 and $45.70 per share for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because such shares would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per common share. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

In first quarter 2006, FHN purchased four million shares of its common stock. This share repurchase program was concluded for an adjusted purchase price of $165.1 million in second quarter 2006.

Note 18 - Restrictions, Contingencies and Other Disclosures

Restrictions on cash and due from banks . The commercial banking subsidiaries of FHN are required to maintain average reserve and clearing balances with the Federal Reserve Bank under the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation D. The balances required on December 31, 2006 and 2005, were $211.8 million and $265.5 million, respectively. These reserves are included in “Cash and due from banks” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

Restrictions on dividends . Dividends are paid by FHN from its assets, which are mainly provided by dividends from its subsidiaries. Certain regulatory restrictions exist regarding the ability of FTBNA to transfer funds to FHN in the form of cash, dividends, loans or advances. As of December 31, 2006, FTBNA had undivided profits of $2,145.6 million of which $642.7 million was available for distribution to FHN as dividends without prior regulatory approval.

Restrictions on intercompany transactions. Under Federal banking law, banking subsidiaries may not extend credit to the parent company in excess of 10 percent of the bank’s capital stock and surplus, as defined, or $375.6 million on December 31, 2006. The parent company had covered transactions of $40.6 million from FTBNA on December 31, 2006. In addition, the aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates, as defined, is limited to 20 percent of the bank’s capital stock and surplus, or $751.1 million on December 31, 2006. FTBNA’s total covered transactions with all affiliates on December 31, 2006 were $477.4 million. Certain loan agreements also define other restricted transactions related to additional borrowings.

Contingencies . Contingent liabilities arise in the ordinary course of business, including those related to litigation. Various claims and lawsuits are pending against FHN and its subsidiaries. Although FHN cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits, after consulting with counsel, management is of the opinion that when resolved, these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements of FHN.

In November 2000, a complaint was filed in state court in Jackson County, Missouri against FHN’s subsidiary, First Horizon Home Loans. The case generally concerns the charging of certain loan origination fees, including fees permitted by Kansas and federal law but allegedly restricted or not permitted by Missouri law, when First Horizon Home Loans or its predecessor, McGuire Mortgage Company, made certain second-lien mortgage loans. Among other relief, plaintiffs seek a refund of fees, a repayment and forgiveness of loan interest, prejudgment interest, punitive damages, loan rescission, and attorneys’ fees. In response to pre-trial motions, the court has certified a statewide class action involving approximately 4,000 loans and has made the following rulings, among others: Missouri law rather than Kansas law governs at least some of those loans made before FHN acquired McGuire (pre-acquisition loans) and Missouri law was not complied with in certain respects as to some such loans; and, federal law governs and permits the charging of loan discount fees as to those loans made after FHN acquired McGuire (post-acquisition loans). Several important issues have not yet been finally resolved by the court, including, among others: whether Missouri or federal law generally governs the post-acquisition loan fees (other than loan discount fees); whether plaintiffs are entitled to seek recovery and forgiveness of loan interest; whether prejudgment interest is available to be awarded; and, whether the applicable statute of limitations is three or six years. Trial had been scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006.

As a result of mediation, FHN has entered into a final settlement agreement related to the McGuire lawsuit. In connection with this settlement, FHN has agreed to pay, under agreed circumstances using an agreed methodology, an aggregate of up to approximately $36 million. The total amount currently reserved for this matter is approximately $22 million. The settlement has received preliminary approval by the court, but is subject to final approval by the court after a hearing.

The loss reserve for this matter reflects an estimate of the amount that ultimately would be paid under the settlement. The difference between the maximum amount possible under the settlement and the amount reserved reflects the company’s view, among other things, of the number of purported class members that probably will participate in the settlement. The assumptions involved in estimating the actual level of participation and loss are highly judgmental and, accordingly, the ultimate amount paid under the settlement could be higher or lower than the amount reserved at present, but cannot exceed the settlement amount.

Other disclosures - Company Owned Life Insurance. FHN has purchased life insurance on certain of its employees and is the beneficiary on these policies. On December 31, 2006, the cash surrender value of these policies, which is included in “Other assets” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, was $686.4 million. There are restrictions on $71.7 million of the proceeds from these benefits which relate to certain compensation plans. FHN has not borrowed against the cash surrender value of these policies.

Note 18 - Restrictions, Contingencies and Other Disclosures (continued)

Other disclosures – Indemnification agreements and guarantees. In the ordinary course of business, FHN enters into indemnification agreements for legal proceedings against its directors and officers and standard representations and warranties for underwriting agreements, merger and acquisition agreements, loan sales, contractual commitments, and various other business transactions or arrangements. The extent of FHN’s obligations under these agreements depends upon the occurrence of future events; therefore, it is not possible to estimate a maximum potential amount of payouts that could be required with such agreements.

First Horizon Home Loans services a mortgage loan portfolio of approximately $101.8 billion on December 31, 2006; a significant portion of which is held by GNMA, FNMA, FHLMC or private security holders. In connection with its servicing activities, First Horizon Home Loans guarantees the receipt of the scheduled principal and interest payments on the underlying loans. In the event of customer non-performance on the loan, First Horizon Home Loans is obligated to make the payment to the security holder. Under the terms of the servicing agreements, First Horizon Home Loans can utilize payments received from other prepaid loans in order to make the security holder whole. In the event payments are ultimately made by First Horizon Home Loans to satisfy this obligation, for loans sold with no recourse, all funds are recoverable from the government agency at foreclosure sale. See Note 24 - Securitizations for additional information on loans sold with recourse.

First Horizon Home Loans is also subject to losses in its loan servicing portfolio due to loan foreclosures and other recourse obligations. Certain agencies have the authority to limit their repayment guarantees on foreclosed loans resulting in certain foreclosure costs being borne by servicers. In addition, First Horizon Home Loans has exposure on all loans sold with recourse. First Horizon Home Loans has various claims for reimbursement, repurchase obligations, and/or indemnification requests outstanding with government agencies or private investors. First Horizon Home Loans has evaluated all of its exposure under recourse obligations based on factors, which include loan delinquency status, foreclosure expectancy rates and claims outstanding. Accordingly, First Horizon Home Loans had an allowance for losses on the mortgage servicing portfolio of approximately $14.0 million and $16.4 million on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. First Horizon Home Loans has sold certain mortgage loans with an agreement to repurchase the loans upon default. For the single-family residential loans, in the event of borrower nonperformance, First Horizon Home Loans would assume losses to the extent they exceed the value of the collateral and private mortgage insurance, FHA insurance or VA guarantees. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, First Horizon Home Loans had single-family residential loans with outstanding balances of $116.4 million and $147.3 million, respectively, that were serviced on a full recourse basis. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, the outstanding principal balance of loans sold with limited recourse arrangements where some portion of the principal is at risk and serviced by First Horizon Home Loans was $3.0 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively. Additionally, on December 31, 2006 and 2005, $5.0 billion and $5.7 billion, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding which were sold under limited recourse arrangements where the risk is limited to interest and servicing advances.

FHN has securitized and sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages which are held by private security holders, and on December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal balance of these loans was $368.8 million and $96.9 million, respectively. On December 31, 2005, the outstanding principal balance of securitized and sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages was $640.6 million and $142.7 million, respectively. In connection with its servicing activities, FTBNA does not guarantee the receipt of the scheduled principal and interest payments on the underlying loans but does have residual interests of $43.9 million and $57.0 million on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which are available to make the security holder whole in the event of credit losses. FHN has projected expected credit losses in the valuation of the residual interest.

Note 19 - Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement

On October 20, 1998, FHN adopted a Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement (the “Agreement”) and declared a dividend of one right on each outstanding share of common stock held on November 2, 1998, or issued thereafter and prior to the time the rights separate and thereafter pursuant to options and convertible securities outstanding at the time the rights separate.

The Agreement provides that until the earlier of the tenth business day (subject to certain adjustments by the board of directors) after a person or group commences a tender or exchange offer that will, subject to certain exceptions, result in such person or group owning 10 percent or more of FHN’s common stock, or the tenth business day (subject to certain adjustments by the board) after the public announcement by FHN that a person or group owns 10 percent or more of FHN’s common stock, the rights will be evidenced by the common stock certificates, will automatically trade with the common stock, and will not be exercisable. Thereafter, separate rights certificates will be distributed, and each right will entitle its holder to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of participating preferred stock having economic and voting terms similar to those of one share of common stock for an exercise price of $150.

If any person or group acquires 10 percent or more of FHN’s common stock, then each right (other than rights beneficially owned by holders of 10 percent or more of the common stock or affiliates, associates or transferees thereof, which rights become void) will entitle its holder to purchase, for the exercise price, a number of shares of FHN common stock or participating preferred stock having a market value of twice the exercise price. Also, if there is a 10 percent shareholder and FHN is involved in certain significant transactions, each right will entitle its holder to purchase, for the exercise price, a number of shares of common stock of the other party having a market value of twice the exercise price. If any person or group acquires 10 percent or more (but not more than 50 percent) of FHN’s common stock, FHN’s board of directors may, at its option, exchange one share of FHN common stock or one one-hundredth of a share of participating preferred stock for each right (other than rights which have become void). The board of directors may amend the Agreement in any respect prior to the tenth business day after announcement by FHN that a person or group has acquired 10 percent or more of FHN’s common stock. The rights will expire on the earliest of the following times: the time of the exchange described in the second preceding sentence; December 31, 2009; or the date the rights are redeemed as described in the following sentence. The rights may be redeemed by the board of directors for $0.001 per right until 10 business days after FHN announces that any person or group owns 10 percent or more of FHN’s common stock.

Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits

Savings plan. Substantially all employees of FHN are covered by a contributory savings plan in conjunction with a flexible benefits plan. During the year, FHN makes contributions to each employee’s flexible benefits plan account. These contributions are based on length of service and a percentage of the employee’s salary. The employees have the option to direct a portion or all of the contribution into their savings plan accounts. Employees may also make pre-tax and after-tax personal contributions to the savings plan. FHN matches certain employee pre-tax contributions invested in FHN’s common stock fund (or for employees of First Horizon Home Loans, contributions made to any savings plan fund) at a rate of $.50 for each $1.00 invested up to 6 percent of the employee’s qualifying salary. Contributions made by FHN to the flexible benefits plan were $31.3 million for 2006, $30.2 million for 2005 and $26.8 million for 2004. A feature of the savings plan allows employees to choose to invest their savings in one or more of ten various component funds, including a nonleveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). Compensation cost related to the ESOP is measured as the amount allocated from matching contributions and discretionary contributions contributed to the ESOP and is included in the contributions amount above. Dividends on shares held by the ESOP are charged to retained earnings and shares held by the ESOP are treated as outstanding in computing earnings per share. The number of allocated shares held by the ESOP totaled 7,574,345 on December 31, 2006.

Pension plan. FHN provides pension benefits to employees retiring under the provisions of a noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan. Employees of FHN’s mortgage subsidiary and certain insurance subsidiaries are not covered by the pension plan. Pension benefits are based on years of service, average compensation near retirement and estimated social security benefits at age 65. The annual funding is based on an actuarially determined amount using the entry age cost method.

FHN also maintains a nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan that covers certain employees whose benefits under the pension plan have been limited under Tax Code Section 415 and Tax Code Section 401(a)(17), which limit compensation to $220,000 for purposes of benefit calculations. Compensation is defined in the same manner as it is under the pension plan. Participants receive the difference between the monthly pension payable, if tax code limits did not apply, and the actual pension payable. All benefits provided under this plan are unfunded and payments to plan participants are made by FHN.

Other employee benefits. FHN provides postretirement medical insurance to full-time employees retiring under the provisions of the FHN Pension Plan. The postretirement medical plan is contributory with retiree contributions adjusted annually. The plan is based on criteria that are a combination of the employee’s age and years of service and utilizes a two-step approach. For any employee retiring on or after January 1, 1995, FHN contributes a fixed amount based on years of service and age at time of retirement. FHN’s postretirement benefits include prescription drug benefits. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. FSP FAS 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,” requires a plan sponsor to determine if benefits offered through a postretirement health care plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. Plan benefits were determined to be actuarially equivalent in 2005. Due to recognizing the Medicare Part D subsidy in 2005 the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was reduced by $7.2 million and net periodic cost was reduced by $.4 million.

Actuarial assumptions. To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, FHN considered the current level of expected returns on risk free investments (primarily government bonds), the historical level of the risk premium associated with the other asset classes in which the portfolio is invested and the expectations for future returns of each asset class. Since FHN’s investment policy is to actively manage certain asset classes where the potential exists to outperform the broader market, the expected returns for those asset classes were adjusted to reflect the expected additional returns. The expected return for each asset class was then weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption for the portfolio. This resulted in the selection of an 8.35 percent assumption for 2007 for the defined benefit pension plan and the other employee benefit plan except for postretirement medical plan assets dedicated to employees who retired prior to January 1, 1993 for which the assumed rate of return for 2007 is 5.43 percent.

The discount rates for the three years ended 2006 for pension and postretirement benefits were determined by using a hypothetical AA yield curve represented by a series of annualized individual discount rates from one-half to thirty years. The discount rate is selected based on data specific to FHN’s plans and employee population.

Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits (continued)

The actuarial assumptions used in the defined benefit pension plan and the other employee benefit plan were as follows:


	Pension Benefits									Postretirement Benefits

	2006			2005			2004			2006			2005			2004

Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as of September 30 measurement date
Discount rate		6.06	%*		5.87	%		6.47	%		5.85	%		5.64	%		6.07	%
Rate of compensation increase		4.10			4.42			5.42			N/A			N/A			N/A

Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the fiscal year
Discount rate		5.87	%		6.47	%		6.25	%		5.64	%		6.00	%		6.25	%
Expected return on plan assets		8.65			8.70			8.75			8.65			8.70			8.75
Expected return on plan assets dedicated to employees who retired prior to January 1, 1993		N/A			N/A			N/A			5.62			5.70			5.75
Rate of compensation increase		4.42			5.42			5.42			N/A			N/A			N/A

*	The discount rate used to determine benefit obligations under the non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plan was 5.88% for 2006.

The assumed health care cost trend rates used in the defined benefit pension plan and the other employee benefit plan were as follows:

2006

2005

Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates on December 31

Participants
under age 65

Participants 65
years and older

Participants
under age 65

Participants 65
years and older

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

9.5%

11.5%

10.0%

12.0%

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)

6.0

6.0

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

2013

2017

2013

2017

The health care cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:


(Dollars in thousands)	1% Increase	1% Decrease

Adjusted total service and interest cost components	$ 1,513	$ 1,392
Adjusted postretirement benefit obligation at end of plan year	20,574	18,620

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the plan years 2006, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:


	Pension Benefits										Postretirement Benefits

(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004				2006			2005			2004

Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	18,081		$	15,781			$	14,359		$	332		$	761			$	723
Interest cost		21,942			21,271				19,335			1,116			1,537				1,932
Expected return on plan assets		(35,778	)		(33,835	)			(30,940	)		(1,683	)		(1,670	)			(1,626	)
Amortization of prior service cost		844			827				684			(176	)		(176	)			(176	)
Recognized losses/(gains)		7,074			4,055				3,711			(562	)		(171	)			—
Amortization of transition obligation		—			—				—			989			989				989

Net periodic cost	$	12,163		$	8,099			$	7,149		$	16		$	1,270			$	1,842

Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits (continued)

Effective December 31, 2006, FHN adopted SFAS No. 158, which required the recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit plan and postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the statements of condition. SFAS No. 158 did not change measurement or recognition requirements for periodic pension and postretirement costs. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 requires that, by 2008, the annual measurement date of a plan’s assets and liabilities be as of the date of the financial statements. The following table summarizes the effect of adoption of SFAS No. 158 on the Consolidated Statement of Condition as of December 31, 2006:


(Dollars in thousands)	Before SFAS No. 158 without MPL adjustments*	MPL adjustments*		SFAS No. 158 adoption adjustments		After SFAS No. 158 adjustments

Other intangible assets, net	$ 66,991	$ (1,657	)	$ (804	)	$ 64,530
Other assets	1,838,522	380		(123,177	)	1,715,725
Total assets	38,043,517	(1,277	)	(123,981	)	37,918,259
Other liabilities	1,342,686	(1,080	)	(47,323	)	1,294,283
Total liabilities	35,209,002	(1,080	)	(47,323	)	35,160,599
Accumulated other comprehensive gain/(loss), net	4,407	(197	)	(76,658	)	(72,448	)
Total shareholders’ equity	2,539,245	(197	)	(76,658	)	2,462,390
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	38,043,517	(1,277	)	(123,981	)	37,918,259

*	MPL - Minimum pension liability

Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits (continued)

The following table sets forth reconciliation of the plans’ benefit obligations and plan assets for 2006 and 2005 as well as the plans’ funded status reconciled to the amounts shown in the Consolidated Statement of Condition for 2005:


	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits

(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005

Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of plan year	$	379,770		$	333,408		$	20,553		$	29,668
Service cost		18,081			15,781			332			761
Interest cost		21,942			21,271			1,116			1,537
Amendments		800			1,857			—			—
Actuarial (gain)/loss		(2,465	)		18,902			(1,669	)		(10,563	)
Benefits paid		(11,129	)		(11,449	)		(1,077	)		(850	)
Expected Medicare Part D reimbursement		—			—			285			—

Benefit obligations at end of plan year	$	406,999		$	379,770		$	19,540		$	20,553

Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of plan year	$	401,939		$	348,065		$	21,660		$	21,560
Actual return on plan assets		30,081			27,765			1,077			950
Employer contribution		537			37,558			—			—
Benefits paid		(11,129	)		(11,449	)		(1,077	)		(850	)

Fair value of plan assets at end of plan year	$	421,428		$	401,939		$	21,660		$	21,660

Net funded status on September 30	$	14,429		$	22,169		$	2,120		$	1,107
Unrecognized net actuarial loss/(gain)					130,681						(10,597	)
Unrecognized net transitional obligation					—						6,917
Unrecognized prior service cost/(benefit)					6,791						(1,420	)

Prepaid benefit cost on September 30					159,641						(3,993	)
Contributions paid from October 1 to December 31					124						—

Prepaid benefit cost on December 31				$	159,765					$	(3,993	)

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Condition consist of the following:
Prepaid benefit cost				$	159,765
Accrued benefit liability					(6,733	)
Intangible asset					2,461
Accumulated other comprehensive income					4,272

Net amount recognized				$	159,765

The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plan was $360.5 million and $343.7 million on September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. FHN made a contribution of $37 million to the pension plan in fourth quarter 2006 and made an additional contribution of $37 million in first quarter 2007. Both of these contributions were attributable to the 2006 plan year. FHN expects to make no additional contributions to the pension plan or to the other employee benefit plan in 2007. On September 30, 2005, the qualified pension plan had $168.9 million in prepaid benefit cost, while the supplemental executive retirement plan had $(9.3) million in benefit cost. The accrued benefit liability, intangible asset and accumulated other comprehensive income were attributable to the unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan.

Upon adoption of SFAS No. 158, unrecognized transition assets and obligations, unrecognized actuarial gains and losses, and unrecognized prior service costs and credits were recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The following table provides detail on a pre-tax basis for prior service cost, net actuarial loss/(gain) and net transitional obligation recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in 2006, related to the defined benefit pension plan and the other employee benefit plan:

Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits (continued)


(Dollars in thousands)	Pension Benefits	Postretirement Benefits

Prior service cost/(benefit)	$ 6,747	$ (1,244	)
Net actuarial loss/(gain)	126,839	(11,098	)
Net transitional obligation	—	5,928

The estimated prior service cost and net actuarial loss/(gain) that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost during 2007 are $.9 million and $7.8 million for the defined benefit pension plan and $(.2) million and $(.7) million for the other employee benefit plan, respectively. The estimated transitional obligation for the other employee benefit plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost during 2007 is $1.0 million.

FHN expects no defined benefit pension plan’s and other employee benefit plan’s assets to be returned to FHN in 2007.

The following table provides detail on expected benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, and projected Medicare reimbursements:


(Dollars in thousands)	Pension Benefits	Postretirement Benefits	Medicare Reimbursements

2007	$ 13,017	$1,618	$435
2008	14,659	1,703	498
2009	16,338	1,779	562
2010	18,037	1,847	622
2011	19,874	1,902	688
2012 - 2016	133,832	9,804	768

Recognition of the funded status of plans in the Consolidated Statement of Condition under SFAS No. 158 eliminated the need to report an additional minimum liability in 2006. Included within other comprehensive income for 2006 was a $316,000 increase in the minimum pension liability and for 2005 was a $215,000 decrease in the minimum pension liability.

The following table sets forth FHN’s pension plan asset allocation on September 30, 2006 and 2005:


					Percentage of Plan Assets on September 30

	Targeted Allocation				2006					2005

Equity securities	70	%				71.1	%				69.7	%
Large capital equity			35	%				33.8	%				31.7	%
Small capital equity			20					20.4					21.0
International equity			15					16.9					17.0
Other	30					28.9					30.3
Fixed income								28.5					29.3
Money market								.4					1.0

Total								100.0	%				100.0	%

The primary investment objective is to ensure, over the long-term life of the pension plan, an adequate pool of sufficiently liquid assets to support the benefit obligations to participants, retirees and beneficiaries. In meeting this objective, the pension plan seeks to achieve a high level of investment return consistent with a prudent level of portfolio risk. Investment objectives are long-term in nature covering typical market cycles of three to five years. Any shortfall of investment performance compared to investment objectives should be explainable in

Note 20 – Savings, Pension and Other Employee Benefits (continued)

terms of general economic and capital market conditions. In addition, the investment objective will be implemented through traditional long-term stock and bond strategies. It is not contemplated at this time that any derivative instruments will be used to achieve investment objectives.

During 2006, FHN reviewed its pension portfolio investment strategy and decided to maintain its equity exposure at 70 percent of total plan assets in 2007. The expected return on plan assets assumption for 2007 will be 8.35 percent.

Risk Management Practices: The asset allocation policy and the associated risk budget has been developed based on an evaluation of the organization’s ability and willingness to assume investment risk based on the Retirement Investment Committee’s financial and benefits-related goals and objectives.

Frequency of Rebalancing: The Retirement Investment Committee will rebalance the portfolio assets as necessary to maintain liquidity for benefit payments and/or stay within the established target asset allocation ranges. At a minimum rebalancing will take place on an annual basis. The following table sets forth FHN’s other benefit plan asset allocation on September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Percentage of Plan Assets on September 30

				2006					2005

Equity securities		69.1	%				56.6	%
Large capital equity					53.4	%				44.1	%
Small capital equity					15.7					12.5
Other		30.9					43.4
Fixed income					26.8					42.1
Cash equivalents and money market					4.1					1.3

Total					100.0	%				100.0	%

The primary investment objective is to ensure, over the long-term life of the retiree medical obligation, an adequate pool of sufficiently liquid assets to partially support the obligations to retirees and beneficiaries. The allocation utilizing a tactical blend of individual securities and registered funds across the broad asset classes is designed to capture a reasonable balance of risk and return based on historical averages and parameters of Trust policy. In meeting this objective, the retiree medical plan seeks to achieve a high level of investment return consistent with a prudent level of portfolio risk. Investment objectives are long-term in nature (longer than 10 years). It is not contemplated at this time that any derivative instruments will be used to achieve investment objectives.

Tactical allocation within the broad strategic objective of 70/30 equity to fixed blend is contemplated periodically with an attention to the likelihood of improving the return potential coupled with a reduction of the risk level.

During 2006, FHN merged its First Funds family of funds with mutual funds managed by Goldman Sachs Asset Management. The following table sets forth the amounts of FHN common stock and amounts and types of mutual funds managed by FTBNA that are included in plan assets:


	Pension Benefits		Postretirement Benefits

(Dollars in thousands)	2006	2005	2006	2005

First Funds Capital Appreciation Portfolio Class I	$ —	$ 84,405	$ —	$ 2,728
First Funds Core Equity Portfolio Class I	—	103,165	—	7,204
First Funds Intermediate Bond Portfolio Class I	—	117,540	—	6,929
First Funds U.S. Government Money Market Portfolio	—	3,959	—	—
First Horizon National Corporation Common Stock*	25,098	24,002	—	—

*	The number of shares of FHN common stock held by the pension plan was 660,300 on September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005.

Note 21 - Stock Option, Restricted Stock Incentive, and Dividend Reinvestment Plans

Stock option plans. FHN issues non-qualified stock options to employees under various plans, which provide for the issuance of FHN common stock at a price equal to its fair market value at the date of grant. All options vest within 3 to 4 years and expire 7 years or 10 years from the date of grant. A deferral program, which was discontinued in 2005, allowed for the foregone compensation plus the exercise price to equal the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant if the grantee agreed to receive the options in lieu of compensation. Any options issued below market on the date of grant during 2005 were related to 2004 salary deferrals for employees and 2004 board compensation for directors. Options that were part of compensation deferral prior to January 2, 2004, expire 20 years from the date of grant. Stock options granted after January 2, 2004, that are part of the compensation deferral expire 10 years from the date of grant. There were 4,849,829 shares available for option or share grants on December 31, 2006.

The summary of stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2006, is shown below:


	Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (thousands)

January 1, 2006	20,289,455		$32.87
Options granted	1,639,524		40.69
Options exercised*	(2,781,544	)	27.03
Options forfeited	(790,658	)	41.59
Options expired	(239,791	)	38.76

December 31, 2006	18,116,986		34.02	6.66	$149,775

Options exercisable	12,138,674		$30.16	7.37	$142,877
Options expected to vest	4,717,813		41.86	5.22	5,455

*	Stock options exercised for year ended December 31, 2006, included 1,242 options converted to stock equivalents as part of the deferred compensation program.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2006, 2005 and 2004, was $37.4 million, $28.0 million and $56.3 million, respectively. On December 31, 2006, there was $13.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.04 years. The following data summarizes information about stock options granted during 2006, 2005 and 2004:


	Number Granted		Weighted Average Fair Value per Option at Grant Date

2006:
Options granted		1,639,524	$	5.92

2005:
Options granted		2,401,011	$	6.90

2004:
Options granted		2,961,967	$	10.26

FHN used the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted in 2006, 2005 and 2004, with the following assumptions:


	2006	2005	2004

Expected dividend yield	4.42%	4.26%	3.51%
Expected weighted-average lives of options granted	5.27 years	5.11 years	4.88 years
Expected weighted-average volatility	19.03%	22.84%	26.57%
Expected volatility range	18.11% - 24.40%	20.00% - 26.30%	21.30% - 28.60%
Risk-free interest rates range	4.78% - 5.00%	3.47% - 4.36%	2.21% - 4.76%

Note 21 - Stock Option, Restricted Stock Incentive, and Dividend Reinvestment Plans (continued)

Expected lives of options granted are determined based on the vesting period, historical exercise patterns and contractual term of the options. Expected volatility is estimated using average of daily high and low stock prices, excluding swings in volatility caused by unique, infrequent circumstances. Expected volatility assumptions are determined over the period of the expected lives of the options.

Restricted stock incentive plans. FHN has authorized the issuance of its common stock for awards to executive and other management employees who have a significant impact on the profitability of FHN. Under a performance accelerated restricted stock program, restricted shares can vest as early as 3 years instead of 10 years following the grant date if predetermined performance criteria are met. Under the long-term incentive program, performance stock units vest only if predetermined performance measures are met. Units are forfeited if the performance criteria are not met. In 2006, restricted stock and stock options were awarded to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, which will vest over 3 and 4 years, but only if predetermined performance measures are met. FHN also grants restricted stock awards to all management employees, which typically vest over 3 and 4 years. Additionally, one of the plans allows stock awards to be granted to non-employee directors upon approval by the board of directors. It has been the recent practice of the board to grant 8,000 shares of restricted stock to each new non-employee director upon election to the board, with restrictions lapsing at a rate of ten percent per year. Beginning in 2007, the old restricted stock program has been discontinued. Each new non-employee director instead will receive an annual award of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) valued at $45,000. Each RSU award will be scheduled to vest the following year and will be paid in common shares plus accrued cash dividends at vesting. Existing non-employee directors also will participate in the new RSU program, but participation will be phased in as the old restricted stock awards vest. As a result of the varied pattern of past awards and the phase-in process, in 2007 all existing non-employee directors who fulfill the vesting requirements will have 800 old restricted shares vest. After 2007, each such director will have one of the following occur each year: 800 old restricted shares will vest; or, a full grant of new RSUs will vest; or, a combination of old restricted shares (less than 800) and new RSUs (less than 100%) will vest. The summary of restricted stock activity during the year ended December 31, 2006, is presented below:


	Shares/ Units			Weighted average grant date fair value

Nonvested on January 1, 2006		1,228,282		$	41.10
Shares/units granted		703,554			40.15
Shares/units vested		(45,574	)		35.30
Shares/units canceled		(206,551	)		41.34

Nonvested on December 31, 2006		1,679,711		$	40.83

On December 31, 2006, there was $17.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.83 years. The total grant date fair value of shares vested during 2006, 2005 and 2004, was $1.6 million, $2.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively.

The board of directors approved amendments to the restricted stock plan during 1998 permitting deferral by participants of the receipt of restricted stock prior to the lapse of restrictions. Due to deferred compensation legislation passed in 2004, participants are no longer allowed to make voluntary deferral elections under the stock programs.

The compensation cost that has been included in income from continuing operations pertaining to both stock option and restricted stock plans was $15.9 million, $30.3 million and $15.7 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The corresponding total income tax benefits recognized in the income statements were $6.0 million, $11.3 million and $5.9 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Consistent with Tennessee state law, only new or authorized, but unissued, shares may be utilized in connection with any issuance of FHN common stock which may be required as a result of share based compensation awards. FHN historically obtains authorization from the Board of Directors to repurchase any shares that may be issued at the time a plan is approved or amended. Repurchases are authorized to be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions and will be subject to market conditions, accumulation of excess equity, and prudent capital management. FHN does not currently expect to repurchase a material number of shares related to the plans during the next annual period.

Note 21 - Stock Option, Restricted Stock Incentive, and Dividend Reinvestment Plans (continued)

Dividend reinvestment plan. The Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan) authorizes the sale of FHN’s common stock from shares acquired on the open market to shareholders who choose to invest all or a portion of their cash dividends and make optional cash payments of $25 to $10,000 per quarter without paying commissions. The price of shares purchased on the open market is the average price paid.

100

Note 22 – Business Segment Information

FHN has four business segments, Retail/Commercial Banking, Mortgage Banking, Capital Markets and Corporate. The Retail/Commercial Banking segment offers financial products and services, including traditional lending and deposit taking, to retail and commercial customers. Additionally, Retail/Commercial Banking provides investments, insurance, financial planning, trust services and asset management, credit card, cash management, check clearing, and correspondent services. On March 1, 2006, FHN sold its national merchant processing business. The divestiture was accounted for as a discontinued operation which is included in the Retail/Commercial Banking segment. The Mortgage Banking segment consists of core mortgage banking elements including originations and servicing and the associated ancillary revenues related to these businesses. The Capital Markets segment consists of traditional capital markets securities activities, structured finance, equity research, investment banking, loan sales, portfolio advisory, and the sale of bank-owned life insurance. The Corporate segment consists of unallocated corporate expenses, expense on subordinated debt issuances and preferred stock, bank-owned life insurance, unallocated interest income associated with excess equity, net impact of raising incremental capital, revenue and expense associated with deferred compensation plans, funds management, and venture capital. Periodically, FHN adapts its segments to reflect changes in expense allocations between segments. Previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation. Effective January 1, 2006, FHN adopted SFAS No. 123-R and retroactively applied the provisions of the standard. Accordingly, results for prior periods have been adjusted to reflect expensing of share-based compensation.

Total revenue, expense and asset levels reflect those which are specifically identifiable or which are allocated based on an internal allocation method. Because the allocations are based on internally developed assignments and allocations, they are to an extent subjective. This assignment and allocation has been consistently applied for all periods presented. The following table reflects the amounts of consolidated revenue, expense, tax, and assets for each segment for the three years ended December 31:


(Dollars in thousands)		2006			2005			2004

Consolidated	Net interest income		$	996,937		$ 984,027			$ 856,311
	Provision for loan losses		83,129			67,678			48,348
	Noninterest income		1,166,893			1,307,256			1,281,831
	Noninterest expense		1,742,621			1,626,894			1,461,808

	Income before income taxes		338,080			596,711			627,986
	Provision for income taxes		87,278			185,988			197,918

	Income from continuing operations		250,802			410,723			430,068
	Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		210,767			17,072			15,640

	Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		461,569			427,795			445,708
	Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		1,345			(3,098	)		—

	Net income		$	462,914		$ 424,697			$ 445,708

	Average assets		$	38,764,567		$36,560,436			$27,305,833

	Depreciation, amortization and MSR impairment		$	144,806		$ 377,075			$ 322,740
	Expenditures for long-lived assets		100,263			95,661			78,763

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

101

Note 22 – Business Segment Information (continued)


(Dollars in thousands)		2006			2005			2004

Retail/Commercial	Net interest income		$ 915,495			$ 862,426			$ 697,615
Banking	Provision for loan losses		83,201			67,061			48,401
	Noninterest income		441,267			420,750			401,825
	Noninterest expense		839,485			773,437			685,746

	Income before income taxes		434,076			442,678			365,293
	Provision for income taxes		126,266			134,582			104,638

	Income from continuing operations		307,810			308,096			260,655
	Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		210,767			17,072			15,640

	Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		518,577			325,168			276,295
	Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		522			(3,098	)		—

	Net income		$ 519,099			$ 322,070			$ 276,295

	Average assets		$23,257,610			$21,501,379			$17,322,175

	Depreciation, amortization and MSR impairment		$ 108,305			$ 104,481			$ 92,942
	Expenditures for long-lived assets		83,039			68,290			45,660

Mortgage Banking	Net interest income		$ 91,715			$ 147,501			$ 154,403
	Provision for loan losses		(72	)		617			(53	)
	Noninterest income		385,244			503,395			460,236
	Noninterest expense		475,140			463,048			421,776

	Income before income taxes		1,891			187,231			192,916
	(Benefit)/provision for income taxes		(2,553	)		65,424			71,516

	Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		4,444			121,807			121,400
	Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		414			—			—

	Net income		$ 4,858			$ 121,807			$ 121,400

	Average assets		$ 6,381,245			$ 6,309,763			$ 5,283,638

	Depreciation, amortization and MSR impairment *		$ 22,315			$ 249,151			$ 220,179
	Expenditures for long-lived assets		9,569			22,347			25,148

Capital Markets	Net interest (expense)/ income		$ (15,378	)		$ (28,488	)		$ 5,028
	Noninterest income		395,334			365,062			379,919
	Noninterest expense		332,191			310,166			295,457

	Income before income taxes		47,765			26,408			89,490
	Provision for income taxes		17,805			9,925			33,917

	Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		29,960			16,483			55,573
	Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		179			—			—

	Net income		$ 30,139			$ 16,483			$ 55,573

	Average assets		$ 4,973,223			$ 5,294,638			$ 1,762,841

	Depreciation and amortization		$ 13,366			$ 11,730			$ 8,230
	Expenditures for long-lived assets		2,298			2,662			3,922

*	Effective January 1, 2006, FHN elected early adoption of SFAS No. 156 which requires MSR to be measured at fair value both initially and prospectively; thus, amortization and impairment are no longer recorded.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

102

Note 22 – Business Segment Information (continued)


(Dollars in thousands)		2006				2005				2004

Corporate	Net interest income/(expense)		$	5,105			$	2,588			$	(735	)
	Noninterest income		(54,952		)		18,049				39,851
	Noninterest expense		95,805				80,243				58,829

	Loss before income taxes		(145,652		)		(59,606		)		(19,713		)
	Income tax benefit		(54,240		)		(23,943		)		(12,153		)

	Loss before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		(91,412		)		(35,663		)		(7,560		)
	Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		230				—				—

	Net loss		$	(91,182	)		$	(35,663	)		$	(7,560	)

	Average assets		$	4,152,489			$	3,454,656			$	2,937,179

	Depreciation and amortization		$	820			$	11,713			$	1,389
	Expenditures for long-lived assets		5,357				2,362				4,033

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

103

Note 23 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting standards require the disclosure of estimated fair values of all asset, liability and off-balance sheet financial instruments. The following fair value estimates are determined as of a specific point in time utilizing various assumptions and estimates. The use of assumptions and various valuation techniques, as well as the absence of secondary markets for certain financial instruments, will likely reduce the comparability of fair value disclosures between financial institutions. In some cases, book value is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the relatively short period of time between origination of the instrument and its expected realization. The following table summarizes the book value and estimated fair value of financial instruments recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Condition as well as off-balance sheet commitments as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:

December 31, 2006

December 31, 2005

(Dollars in thousands)

Book
Value

Fair
Value

Book
Value

Fair
Value

Assets:

Loans, net of unearned income:

Floating

$15,216,402

$15,215,112

$14,552,575

$14,551,479

Fixed

6,805,666

6,764,631

6,018,652

5,924,663

Nonaccrual

82,837

40,771

Allowance for loan losses

(216,285

)

(216,285

)

(189,705

)

(189,705

)

Total net loans

21,888,620

21,846,295

20,422,293

20,327,208

Liquid assets

3,451,319

3,629,314

Loans held for sale

2,873,577

2,890,048

4,424,267

4,439,005

Securities available for sale

3,890,151

2,912,103

Securities held to maturity

269

272

383

390

Derivative assets

169,032

49,259

Nonearning assets

1,883,074

1,607,827

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Defined maturity

$ 9,441,679

$ 9,445,258

$13,410,641

$13,405,293

Undefined maturity

10,771,553

9,906,916

Total deposits

20,213,232

20,216,811

23,317,557

23,312,209

Short-term borrowings

7,010,269

5,331,397

Long-term debt

5,836,360

5,833,129

3,437,643

3,465,705

Derivative liabilities

74,398

88,305

Other noninterest-bearing liabilities

938,681

696,558

Preferred stock of subsidiary

295,270

309,563

295,274

303,281

Contractual
Amount

Fair
Value

Contractual
Amount

Fair
Value

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments:

Loan commitments

$16,061,088

$ 7,163

$16,932,527

$ 9,735

Other commitments

818,438

7,719

771,604

8,439

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

104

Note 23 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The following describes the assumptions and methodologies used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments:

Floating rate loans. With the exception of floating rate 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, the fair value is approximated by the book value. Floating rate 1-4 family residential mortgage loans reprice annually and will lag movements in market rates; whereas, commercial and consumer loans typically reprice monthly. The fair value for floating rate 1-4 family mortgage loans is calculated by discounting future cash flows to their present value. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value by using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same time period. Prepayment assumptions based on historical prepayment speeds and industry speeds for similar loans have been applied to the floating rate 1-4 family residential mortgage portfolio.

Fixed rate loans. The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows to their present value. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value by using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same time period. Prepayment assumptions based on historical prepayment speeds and industry speeds for similar loans have been applied to the fixed rate mortgage and installment loan portfolios.

Nonaccrual loans. The fair value is approximated by the book value.

Allowance for loan losses. The fair value is approximated by the book value. Additionally, the credit exposure known to exist in the loan portfolio is embodied in the allowance for loan losses.

Liquid assets. The fair value is approximated by the book value. For the purpose of this disclosure, liquid assets consist of federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, capital markets securities inventory, mortgage banking trading securities, and investment in bank time deposits.

Loans held for sale. Fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is based primarily on quoted market prices. Fair value of home equity lines of credit held for sale is based upon market values as evidenced in prior securitizations. Fair value of other loans held for sale is approximated by their carrying values.

Securities available for sale. Fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices.

Securities held to maturity. Fair values for marketable securities are based primarily on quoted market prices.

Derivative assets. Fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices.

Nonearning assets. The fair value is approximated by the book value. For the purpose of this disclosure, nonearning assets include cash and due from banks, accrued interest receivable and capital markets receivables.

Defined maturity deposits. The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows to their present value. Future cash flows are discounted by using the current market rates of similar instruments applicable to the remaining maturity. For the purpose of this disclosure, defined maturity deposits include all certificates of deposit and other time deposits.

Undefined maturity deposits. The fair value is approximated by the book value. For the purpose of this disclosure, undefined maturity deposits include demand deposits, checking interest accounts, savings accounts, and money market accounts.

Short-term borrowings. The fair value of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper, trading liabilities, and other short-term borrowings is approximated by the book value.

Long-term debt. The fair value is approximated by the present value of the contractual cash flows discounted by the investor’s yield which considers FHN’s and FTBNA’s debt ratings.

105

Note 23 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Derivative liabilities. Fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices.

Other noninterest-bearing liabilities. For the purpose of this disclosure, other noninterest-bearing liabilities include accrued interest payable and capital markets payables. The fair value is approximated by the book value.

Preferred stock of subsidiary. The fair value is approximated by the current trade amount of similar instruments.

Loan Commitments. Fair values are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

Other Commitments. Fair values are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements.

106

Note 24 - Securitizations

During 2006 and 2005, FHN securitized $22.4 billion and $29.5 billion, respectively, of single-family residential loans in primarily proprietary and agency securitization transactions, and the resulting securities were sold as senior and subordinate certificates. In 2006 and 2005, FHN recognized net pre-tax gains of $279.2 million and $321.9 million, respectively, from the sale of securitized loans which includes gains recognized on the capitalization of MSR associated with these loans. In 2006 and 2005, FHN capitalized approximately $416.0 million and $437.1 million, respectively, in originated MSR. These MSR, as well as other MSR held by FHN, are discussed further in Note 6 – Mortgage Servicing Rights. In certain cases, FHN continues to service and receive servicing fees related to the securitized loans, and has also retained residual interest certificates or financial assets including excess interest (structured as interest-only strips), principal-only strips, interest-only strips, or subordinated bonds. FHN received annual servicing fees approximating .33 percent in 2006 and .32 percent in 2005 of the outstanding balance of underlying mortgage loans. FHN received annual servicing fees approximating .50 percent in 2006 and 2005 of the outstanding balance of underlying loans for HELOC securitizations. Additionally, FHN retained rights to future cash flows on the HELOC securitizations arising after investors in the securitization trust have received the return for which they contracted. The investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse to other assets of First Horizon Home Loans or FHN for failure of debtors to pay when due.

The sensitivity of the current fair value of all retained or purchased interests for MSR to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in assumptions on December 31, 2006, are as follows:



(Dollars in thousands except for annual cost to service)	First Liens			Second Liens			HELOC

December 31, 2006
Fair value of retained interests	$	1,495,215		$	24,091		$	14,636
Weighted average life (in years)		6.5			2.9			2.0

Annual prepayment rate		12.1	%		29.1	%		49.0	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(55,436	)	$	(1,140	)	$	(850	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change		(109,915	)		(2,160	)		(1,622	)

Annual discount rate on servicing cash flows		10.2	%		14.0	%		18.0	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(56,578	)	$	(651	)	$	(364	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change		(112,015	)		(1,266	)		(707	)

Annual cost to service (per loan)*	$	55		$	50		$	50
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change		(13,280	)		(397	)		(222	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change		(27,934	)		(795	)		(445	)

Annual earnings on escrow		4.5	%		5.2	%		5.3	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(33,595	)	$	(706	)	$	(588	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change		(67,713	)		(1,411	)		(1,175	)

* The annual cost to service includes an incremental cost to service delinquent loans. Historically, this fair value sensitivity disclosure has not included this incremental cost. The annual cost to service
first-lien mortgage loans without the incremental cost to service delinquent loans was $49 as of December 31, 2006.

107

Note 24 – Securitizations (continued)

The sensitivity of the current fair value of retained interests for other residuals to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in assumptions on December 31, 2006, are as follows:


(Dollars in thousands except for annual cost to service)	Excess Interest IO		Certificated PO		IO		Subordinated Bonds		Residual Interest Certificates 2nd Liens		Residual Interest Certificates HELOC

December 31, 2006
Fair value of retained interests	$273,834		$2,758		$169		$4,699		$9,357		$34,549
Weighted average life (in years)	7.2		4.2		.9		7.7		2.9		2.4

Annual prepayment rate	8.6	%	20.4	%	68.6	%	15.7	%	28.0	%	44.0	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$ (9,703	)	$ (79	)	$ (29	)	$ (1	)	$ (164	)	$ (1,199	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	(18,917	)	(170	)	(57	)	(2	)	(307	)	(2,255	)

Annual discount rate on residual cash flows	11.5	%	9.5	%	13.0	%	11.5	%	20.0	%	18.0	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$(11,719	)	$ (77	)	$ (2	)	$ (172	)	$ (272	)	$ (912	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	(22,606	)	(151	)	(3	)	(334	)	(525	)	(1,750	)

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot necessarily be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated independently from any change in another assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Furthermore, the estimated fair values as disclosed should not be considered indicative of future earnings on these assets.

FHN uses assumptions and estimates in determining the fair value allocated to retained interests at the time of initial securitization. The key economic assumptions used to measure the fair value of the MSR at the date of securitization or loan sale were as follows:



	First Liens		Second Liens		HELOC

2006
Weighted average life (in years)		5.7-7.8		2.7-2.9		1.7-2.0
Annual prepayment rate		10.6%-16.3%		25%-35%		45%-55%
Annual discount rate		9.4%-11.4%		14.0%		18.0%
Annual cost to service (per loan)*		$56-$58		$50		$50
Annual earnings on escrow		4.2%-4.9%		2.0%-5.3%		2.0%-5.3%

2005
Weighted average life (in years)		5.4-6.6		2.7-2.9		1.7-2.0
Annual prepayment rate		11.5%-15.2%		30%		45%-55%
Annual discount rate		10.06%-10.14%		14.0%-20.0%		18.0%
Annual cost to service (per loan)		$45-$46		$50		$50
Annual earnings on escrow		3.21%-4.31%		2.0%-4.2%		2.0%-4.4%

* The annual cost to service includes an incremental cost to service delinquent loans. Historically, the disclosure of annual cost to service assumptions has not included this incremental cost. The
range of annual cost to service loans without the incremental cost to service delinquent loans was $48-$50 for MSR capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2006.

108

Note 24 – Securitizations (continued)

The key economic assumptions used to measure the fair value of other retained interests at the date of securitization were as follows:



	Excess Interest IO	Certificated PO

2006
Weighted average life (in years)	6.9-8.4	3.2-5.6
Annual prepayment rate	7.8%-12.0%	14.7%-24.0%
Annual discount rate	11.5%	5.0%-16.2%

2005
Weighted average life (in years)	5.8-7.2	3.0-5.7
Annual prepayment rate	8.3%-11.8%	13.6%-23.3%
Annual discount rate	11.5%	5.6%-14.54%

FTN Financial Capital Assets Corporation (FTNFCAC), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of FHN, enters into transactions where mortgage loans are purchased, pooled, securitized and sold. During 2006 and 2005, $189.4 million and $701.0 million of mortgage loans were sold for pre-tax gains of $2.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively, that were recognized in capital markets noninterest income. FTNFCAC does not retain servicing rights or any other form of retained interest on these securitizations.

For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, cash flows received and paid related to securitizations were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2006	2005	2004

Proceeds from initial securitizations	$ 22,639,364	$ 30,359,513	$ 26,834,087
Servicing fees retained*	344,337	287,290	232,566
Purchases of GNMA guaranteed mortgages	159,666	212,145	315,646
Purchases of delinquent or foreclosed assets	8,015	9,260	13,213
Other cash flows received on retained interests	54,572	76,425	57,637

* Includes servicing fees on originated, securitized and purchased MSR.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

109

Note 24 – Securitizations (continued)

As of December 31, 2006, the principal amount of loans securitized and other loans managed with them, and the principal amount of delinquent loans, in addition to net credit losses during 2006 are as follows:



(Dollars in thousands)	Total Principal Amount of Loans		Principal Amount of Delinquent Loans*	Net Credit Losses

	On December 31, 2006			For the Year Ended December 31, 2006

Type of loan:
Real estate residential	$78,772,282		$433,812	$37,163

Total loans managed or securitized**	78,772,282		$433,812	$37,163

Loans securitized and sold	(68,226,955	)
Loans held for sale or securitization	(2,572,014	)

Loans held in portfolio	$ 7,973,313

*	Loans 90 days or more past due include $128.6 million of GNMA guaranteed mortgages.
**	Securitized loans are real estate residential loans in which FHN has a retained interest other than servicing rights.

110

Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business, FHN utilizes various financial instruments, through its mortgage banking, capital markets and risk management operations, which include derivative contracts and credit-related arrangements, as part of its risk management strategy and as a means to meet customers’ needs. These instruments are subject to credit and market risks in excess of the amount recorded on the balance sheet in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The contractual or notional amounts of these financial instruments do not necessarily represent credit or market risk. However, they can be used to measure the extent of involvement in various types of financial instruments. Controls and monitoring procedures for these instruments have been established and are routinely reevaluated. The Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) monitors the usage and effectiveness of these financial instruments.

Credit risk represents the potential loss that may occur because a party to a transaction fails to perform according to the terms of the contract. The measure of credit exposure is the replacement cost of contracts with a positive fair value. FHN manages credit risk by entering into financial instrument transactions through national exchanges, primary dealers or approved counterparties, and using mutual margining agreements whenever possible to limit potential exposure. With exchange-traded contracts, the credit risk is limited to the clearinghouse used. For non-exchange traded instruments, credit risk may occur when there is a gain in the fair value of the financial instrument and the counterparty fails to perform according to the terms of the contract and/or when the collateral proves to be of insufficient value. Market risk represents the potential loss due to the decrease in the value of a financial instrument caused primarily by changes in interest rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds or the prices of debt instruments. FHN manages market risk by establishing and monitoring limits on the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken. FHN continually measures this risk through the use of models that measure value-at-risk and earnings-at-risk.

Derivative Instruments. FHN enters into various derivative contracts both in a dealer capacity, to facilitate customer transactions, and also as a risk management tool. Where contracts have been created for customers, FHN enters into transactions with dealers to offset its risk exposure. Derivatives are also used as a risk management tool to hedge FHN’s exposure to changes in interest rates or other defined market risks.

Derivative instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Condition as other assets or other liabilities measured at fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount FHN would receive or pay in the market to replace the derivatives as of the valuation date. Fair value is determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. For a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability are recognized currently in earnings. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent that it is effective, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to earnings as the hedged transaction impacts net income. Any ineffective portion of a cash flow hedge is recognized currently in earnings. For freestanding derivative instruments, changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings. Cash flows from derivative contracts are reported as operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Interest rate forward contracts are over-the-counter contracts where two parties agree to purchase and sell a specific quantity of a financial instrument at a specified price, with delivery or settlement at a specified date. Futures contracts are exchange-traded contracts where two parties agree to purchase and sell a specific quantity of a financial instrument at a specific price, with delivery or settlement at a specified date. Interest rate option contracts give the purchaser the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a specified quantity of a financial instrument, at a specified price, during a specified period of time. Caps and floors are options that are linked to a notional principal amount and an underlying indexed interest rate. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of interest payments at specified intervals between two parties without the exchange of any underlying principal. Swaptions are options on interest rate swaps that give the purchaser the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap agreement during a specified period of time.

Mortgage Banking

111

Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (continued)

commitments are also included in current earnings as a component of gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.

First Horizon Home Loans’ warehouse (mortgage loans held for sale) is subject to changes in fair value, primarily due to fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, First Horizon Home Loans enters into forward sales contracts and futures contracts to provide an economic hedge against those changes in fair value on a significant portion of the warehouse. These derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of the gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.

To the extent that these interest rate derivatives are designated to hedge specific similar assets in the warehouse and prospective analyses indicate that high correlation is expected, the hedged loans are considered for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. Anticipated correlation is determined based on historical regressions between the change in fair value of the derivatives and the change in fair value of hedged mortgage loans. Beginning in fourth quarter 2005, anticipated correlation is determined by projecting a dollar offset relationship for each tranche based on anticipated changes in the fair value of the hedged mortgage loans and the related derivatives, in response to various interest rate shock scenarios. Hedges are reset daily and the statistical correlation is calculated using these daily data points. Retrospective hedge effectiveness is measured using the regression correlation results. First Horizon Home Loans generally maintains a coverage ratio (the ratio of expected change in the fair value of derivatives to expected change in the fair value of hedged assets) of approximately 100 percent on warehouse loans hedged under SFAS No. 133. Effective SFAS No. 133 hedging results in adjustments to the recorded value of the hedged loans. These basis adjustments, as well as the change in fair value of derivatives attributable to effective hedging, are included as a component of the gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.

First Horizon Home Loans also enters into hedges of the MSR to minimize the effects of loss in value of MSR associated with increased prepayment activity that generally results from declining interest rates. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of the MSR generally will increase while the value of the hedge instruments will decline. First Horizon Home Loans enters into interest rate contracts (including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) to hedge against the effects of changes in fair value of its MSR. Substantially all capitalized MSR are hedged for economic purposes.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 156, First Horizon Home Loans hedged the changes in MSR value attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate (10-year LIBOR swap rate). The vast majority of MSR routinely qualified for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. For purposes of measuring effectiveness of the hedge, time decay and recognized net interest income, including changes in value attributable to changes in spot and forward prices, if applicable, were excluded from the change in value of the related derivatives. Interest rate derivative contracts used to hedge against interest rate risk in the servicing portfolio were designated to specific risk tranches of servicing. Hedges were reset at least monthly and more frequently, as needed, to respond to changes in interest rates or hedge composition. Generally, a coverage ratio approximating 100 percent was maintained on hedged MSR. Prior to acquiring a new hedge instrument, First Horizon Home Loans performed a prospective evaluation of anticipated hedge effectiveness by reviewing the historical regression between the underlying index of the proposed hedge instrument and the mortgage rate. At the end of each hedge period, the change in the fair value of the hedged MSR asset due to the change in the benchmark interest rate was calculated and became a historical data point. Retrospective hedge effectiveness was determined by performing a regression analysis of all collected data points over a rolling 12-month period. Effective hedging under SFAS No. 133 resulted in adjustments to the recorded value of the MSR. These basis adjustments, as well as the change in fair value of derivatives attributable to effective hedging, were included as a component of servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income. MSR subject to SFAS No. 133 hedges totaled $1.3 billion on December 31, 2005. The balance sheet impact of the related derivatives was a net liability of $21.2 million on December 31, 2005.

112

Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (continued)

The following table summarizes certain information related to mortgage banking hedging activities for the years ended December 31:


(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004

Warehouse loans
Fair value hedge ineffectiveness net losses	$	(11,500	)	$	(1,168	)	$	(16,571	)

Mortgage servicing rights
Fair value hedge ineffectiveness net (losses)/gains		N/A**			(1,891	)		1,373
Net gains excluded from assessment of effectiveness*		N/A**			13,884			46,546

*	Represents the derivative gain from net interest income on swaps, net of time decay.
**	Due to adoption of SFAS No. 156, MSR are no longer hedged under SFAS No. 133. First Horizon Home Loans continues to enter into interest rate contracts to provide an economic hedge against changes in fair value of MSR.

In 2005, First Horizon Home Loans used different MSR stratification for purposes of determining hedge effectiveness pursuant to SFAS No. 133 and performing impairment testing pursuant to SFAS No. 140. The hedge results were evaluated under SFAS No. 133 using specific risk tranches that were established for hedging purposes. For risk tranches that were successfully hedged pursuant to SFAS No. 133, the MSR basis adjustments were allocated to small pools of loans within the risk tranches. These pools of loans were then aggregated into the less granular SFAS No. 140 strata. This adjusted MSR carrying value was then compared to the fair value of the MSR for each stratum to test for asset impairment. MSR basis was reduced to the extent that carrying value exceeds fair value. Any reduction in carrying value as a result of this impairment test was included as a component of servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income. In 2006, First Horizon began revaluing MSR to current fair value each month. Changes in fair value are included in servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income.

First Horizon Home Loans utilizes derivatives (including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) that change in value inversely to the movement of interest rates to protect the value of its interest-only securities as an economic hedge. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized currently in earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income. Interest-only securities are included in trading securities with changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income.

Capital Markets

Capital Markets trades U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, mortgage-backed, corporate and municipal fixed income securities, and other securities for distribution to customers. When these securities settle on a delayed basis, they are considered forward contracts. Capital Markets also enters into interest rate contracts, including options, caps, swaps, futures and floors for its customers. In addition, Capital Markets enters into futures contracts to economically hedge interest rate risk associated with its securities inventory. These transactions are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in capital markets noninterest income. Related assets and liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet as other assets and other liabilities. Credit risk related to these transactions is controlled through credit approvals, risk control limits and ongoing monitoring procedures through the Senior Credit Policy Committee.

In 2005, Capital Markets utilized a forward contract as a cash flow hedge of the risk of change in the fair value of a forecasted sale of certain loans. In 2006, $77 thousand of net losses which were recorded in other comprehensive income on December 31, 2005, were recognized in earnings. The amount of SFAS No. 133 hedge ineffectiveness related to this cash flow hedge was immaterial.

Interest Rate Risk Management

FHN’s ALCO focuses on managing market risk by controlling and limiting earnings volatility attributable to changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk exists to the extent that interest-earning assets and liabilities have different maturity or repricing characteristics. FHN uses derivatives, including swaps, caps, options, and collars, that are designed to moderate the impact on earnings as interest rates change. FHN’s interest rate risk management policy is to use derivatives not to speculate but to hedge interest rate risk or market value of assets or liabilities. In addition, FHN has entered into certain interest rate swaps and caps as a part of a product offering to commercial customers with customer derivatives paired with offsetting market instruments that, when completed, are designed to eliminate market risk. These

113

Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (continued)

contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and are measured at fair value with gains or losses included in current earnings in noninterest income.

FHN has entered into pay floating, receive fixed interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk of certain large institutional certificates of deposit, totaling $61.5 million and $61.2 million on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These swaps have been accounted for as fair value hedges under the shortcut method. The balance sheet impact of these swaps was $1.0 million and $1.3 million in other liabilities on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest paid or received for these swaps was recognized as an adjustment of the interest expense of the liabilities whose risk is being managed.

FHN has entered into pay floating, receive fixed interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk of certain long-term debt obligations, totaling $1.1 billion and $.9 billion on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These swaps have been accounted for as fair value hedges under the shortcut method. The balance sheet impact of these swaps was $1.7 million in other assets and $18.7 million in other liabilities on December 31, 2006, and was $1.6 million in other assets and $11.5 million in other liabilities on December 31, 2005. Interest paid or received for these swaps was recognized as an adjustment of the interest expense of the liabilities whose risk is being managed.

FHN has determined that derivative transactions used in hedging strategies to manage interest rate risk on subordinated debt related to its trust preferred securities did not qualify for hedge accounting under the shortcut method. As a result, any fluctuations in the market value of the derivatives should have been recorded through the income statement with no corresponding offset to the hedged item. While management believes these hedges would have qualified for hedge accounting under the long haul method, that accounting cannot be applied retroactively. FHN evaluated the impact to all quarterly and annual periods since the inception of the hedges and concluded that the impact was immaterial in each period. In 2006, FHN recorded an adjustment to recognize the cumulative impact of these transactions that resulted in a negative $15.6 million impact to noninterest income, which was included in current earnings. FHN has subsequently redesignated these hedge relationships under SFAS No. 133 using the long haul method. For the period of time during first quarter 2006 that these hedge relationships were not redesignated under SFAS No. 133, the swaps were measured at fair value with gains or losses included in current earnings. FHN has entered into pay floating, receive fixed interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk of certain subordinated debt totaling $.3 billion on December 31, 2006 and 2005. The balance sheet impact of these swaps was $18.2 million and $15.6 million in other liabilities on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. There was no ineffectiveness related to these hedges. Interest paid or received for these swaps was recognized as an adjustment of the interest expense of the liabilities whose risk is being managed.

In 2006, FHN utilized an interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of the interest payment on floating-rate bank notes with a fair value of $100.6 million on December 31, 2006, and a maturity in first quarter 2009. The balance sheet impact of this swap was $.6 million in other assets and $.3 million, net of tax, in other comprehensive income. There was no ineffectiveness related to this hedge.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Credit-Related Commitments. FHN enters into fixed and variable loan commitments with customers. When these commitments have contract rate adjustments that lag changes in market rates, the financial instruments have characteristics similar to option contracts. FHN follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each counterparty’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.

Commitments to extend credit are contractual obligations to lend to a customer as long as all established contractual conditions are met. These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The majority of FHN’s loan commitments has maturities less than one year and reflects the prevailing market rates at the time of the commitment. Since commitments may expire without being fully drawn upon, total contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future credit exposure or liquidity requirements.

Other commitments include standby and commercial letters of credit and other credit enhancements. Standby and commercial letters of credit and other credit enhancements are conditional commitments issued by FHN to guarantee the performance and/or payment of a customer to a third party in connection with specified transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing these commitments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers, as performance under any of these facilities would result in a loan being funded to the customer.

114

Note 25 – Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (continued)

FHN services loans for others, and, in some cases, provides guarantees or recourse on the serviced loans. See Note 18 - Restrictions, Contingencies and Other Disclosures for additional information.

The following is a summary of each class of credit-related commitments outstanding on December 31:


(Dollars in millions)	2006		2005

Commitments to extend credit:
Consumer credit card lines		$ 2,186.1		$ 2,432.5
Consumer home equity		6,861.0		6,991.3
Commercial real estate and construction and land development		3,567.8		3,686.0
Commercial and other		3,446.2		3,822.8

Total loan commitments		16,061.1		16,932.6
Other commitments:
Standby letters of credit		771.9		724.6
Other		46.5		47.0

Total loan and other commitments		$16,879.5		$17,704.2

Variable Interest Entities. Under the provisions of FIN 46-R, FHN is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and required to consolidate a VIE if it has a variable interest that will absorb the majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive the majority of expected residual returns, or both. A VIE exists when equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities by itself. A variable interest is a contractual, ownership or other interest that changes with changes in the fair value of the VIE’s net assets. Expected losses and expected residual returns are measures of variability in the expected cash flow of a VIE.

Since 1997, First Tennessee Housing Corporation (FTHC), a wholly-owned subsidiary, makes equity investments as a limited partner, in various partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital and to support FHN’s community reinvestment initiatives. The activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants generally within FHN’s primary geographic region. On December 31, 2006 and 2005, FTHC’s maximum exposure to loss resulting from LIHTC investments was $121.3 million and $106.7 million, respectively. This represents the investment value of $100.5 million and $102.6 million included in “Other assets” on the Consolidated Statements of Condition and unfunded commitments of $20.8 million and $4.1 million on December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

In 2006, FTBNA established several Delaware statutory trusts (Trusts), for the purpose of engaging in secondary market financing. On December 31, 2006, the amount of retail real estate residential loans used to collateralize secured borrowings was $590.9 million. Except for recourse due to breaches of standard representations and warranties made by FTBNA in connection with the sale of the retail real estate residential loans by FTBNA to the Trusts, the creditors of the Trusts hold no recourse to the assets of FTBNA.

115

Note 26 - Parent Company Financial Information

Following are condensed statements of the parent company:


Statements of Condition	December 31

(Dollars in thousands)	2006		2005

Assets:
Cash		$ 32		$ 305
Securities purchased from subsidiary bank under agreements to resell		185,328		143,183

Total cash and cash equivalents		185,360		143,488
Investment in bank time deposits		20,577		16,477
Securities available for sale		42,342		29,197
Notes receivable		3,700		3,700
Investments in subsidiaries:
Bank		2,649,142		2,588,650
Non-bank		33,973		34,947
Other assets		303,553		276,991

Total assets		$3,238,647		$3,093,450

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings		$ 5,620		$ 10,695
Accrued employee benefits and other liabilities		330,275		307,424
Long-term debt		440,362		427,792

Total liabilities		776,257		745,911
Shareholders’ equity		2,462,390		2,347,539

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$3,238,647		$3,093,450

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.


Statements of Income	Year Ended December 31

(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004

Dividend income:
Bank		$415,000			$220,065			$110,109
Non-bank		4,763			5,484			9,059

Total dividend income		419,763			225,549			119,168
Interest income		6,675			4,096			3,816
Other income		(12,569	)		164			4,801

Total income		413,869			229,809			127,785

Interest expense:
Short-term debt		365			487			252
Long-term debt		27,001			21,243			13,581

Total interest expense		27,366			21,730			13,833
Compensation, employee benefits and other expense		33,452			43,072			30,532

Total expense		60,818			64,802			44,365

Income before income taxes		353,051			165,007			83,420
Income tax benefit		(36,844	)		(34,079	)		(21,491	)

Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		389,895			199,086			104,911
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		127			—			—

Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		390,022			199,086			104,911
Equity in undistributed net income/(loss) of subsidiaries:
Bank		73,345			225,053			342,496
Non-bank		(453	)		558			(1,699	)

Net income		$462,914			$424,697			$445,708

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

116

Note 26 - Parent Company Financial Information (continued)


Statements of Cash Flows	Year Ended December 31

(Dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004

Operating activities:
Net income	$	462,914		$	424,697		$	445,708
Less undistributed net income of subsidiaries		72,892			225,611			340,797

Income before undistributed net income of subsidiaries		390,022			199,086			104,911
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred income tax (benefit)/provision		(928	)		2,572			(10,657	)
Depreciation and amortization		2,716			1,767			3,277
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		(127	)		—			—
Stock-based compensation expense		4,455			11,549			3,433
Loss/(gain) on sale of securities		174			641			(2,408	)
Net increase in interest receivable and other assets		(39,641	)		(28,890	)		(63,809	)
Net increase in interest payable and other liabilities		30,246			18,616			68,701

Total adjustments		(3,105	)		6,255			(1,463	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		386,917			205,341			103,448

Investing activities:
Securities:
Sales and prepayments		38			62			20,926
Purchases		(3,475	)		(175	)		(190	)
(Increase)/decrease in investment in bank time deposits		(4,100	)		14,300			123,190
Advances to subsidiaries		(30,000	)		—			—
Repayment of advances to subsidiaries		30,000			—			—
Return on investment in subsidiary		127			1,290			5,005
Cash investments in subsidiaries		(687	)		(16,632	)		(10,000	)

Net cash (used)/provided by investing activities		(8,097	)		(1,155	)		138,931

Financing activities:
Common stock:
Exercise of stock options		57,082			41,289			67,935
Cash dividends		(223,386	)		(214,024	)		(198,495	)
Repurchase of shares		(165,569	)		(488	)		(184,224	)
Long-term debt:
Payment		—			(22,897	)		(9,500	)
Issuance		—			—			204,186
Decrease in short-term borrowings		(5,075	)		(13,017	)		(8,081	)

Net cash used by financing activities		(336,948	)		(209,137	)		(128,179	)

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		41,872			(4,951	)		114,200

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		143,488			148,439			34,239

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	185,360		$	143,488		$	148,439

Total interest paid	$	26,840		$	20,977		$	11,132
Total income taxes paid		102,685			171,930			159,700

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

117


CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)


																		Growth Rates (%)

(Dollars in millions except per share data)	2006			2005			2004		2003			2002			2001			06/05		06/01*

Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	1,591.0		$	1,133.5		$	774.7	$	657.6		$	666.0		$	811.7		40.4	+	14.4	+
Investment securities		186.7			124.5			104.2		111.2			143.0			168.2		50.0	+	2.1	+
Loans held for sale		288.2			377.9			226.8		229.1			184.0			165.9		23.8	-	11.7	+
Trading securities inventory		171.1			138.5			53.4		50.5			43.7			48.6		23.5	+	28.6	+
Other earning assets		92.1			65.8			7.7		5.0			5.5			7.1		40.0	+	67.0	+

Total interest income		2,329.1			1,840.2			1,166.8		1,053.4			1,042.2			1,201.5		26.6	+	14.2	+

Interest expense:
Deposits:
Savings		88.5			44.4			19.6		19.8			33.1			76.8		99.3	+	2.9	+
Time deposits		120.3			79.0			60.1		57.1			71.2			111.1		52.3	+	1.6	+
Other interest-bearing deposits		24.5			15.5			4.8		3.8			6.2			11.9		58.1	+	15.5	+
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more		493.2			364.1			108.0		69.4			79.8			137.1		35.5	+	29.2	+
Interest on trading liabilities		76.1			80.2			20.0		22.1			16.0			10.1		5.1	-	49.8	+
Interest on short-term borrowings		248.9			171.9			47.8		40.0			51.7			135.4		44.8	+	12.9	+
Interest on long-term debt		280.7			101.1			50.2		35.4			28.6			30.2		177.6	+	56.2	+

Total interest expense		1,332.2			856.2			310.5		247.6			286.6			512.6		55.6	+	21.0	+

Net interest income		996.9			984.0			856.3		805.8			755.6			688.9		1.3	+	7.7	+
Provision for loan losses		83.1			67.7			48.3		86.7			92.2			93.2		22.8	+	2.3	-

Net interest income after provision		913.8			916.3			808.0		719.1			663.4			595.7		.3	-	8.9	+

Noninterest income:
Capital markets		383.0			353.0			376.5		538.9			448.0			344.3		8.5	+	2.2	+
Mortgage banking		370.6			479.6			444.8		649.5			436.7			285.0		22.7	-	5.4	+
Deposit transactions and cash management		168.6			156.2			148.5		146.7			143.3			133.6		7.9	+	4.8	+
Revenue from loan sales and securitizations		51.7			47.6			23.1		—			2.3			—		8.6	+	NM
Insurance commissions		46.6			54.1			56.1		57.8			50.4			16.8		13.8	-	22.6	+
Trust services and investment management		41.5			44.6			47.3		45.9			48.4			56.7		6.9	-	6.0	-
Equity securities gains/(losses), net		10.3			(.5	)		2.0		8.5			(9.4	)		(3.3	)	NM		NM
Debt securities (losses)/gains, net		(75.9	)		—			18.7		(6.1	)		.2			(1.0	)	NM		NM
Gains on divestitures		—			7.0			1.2		12.5			2.3			60.4		NM		NM
All other income and commissions		170.5			165.7			163.6		145.7			140.9			136.2		2.9	+	4.6	+

Total noninterest income		1,166.9			1,307.3			1,281.8		1,599.4			1,263.1			1,028.7		10.7	-	2.6	+

Adjusted gross income after provision		2,080.7			2,223.6			2,089.8		2,318.5			1,926.5			1,624.4		6.4	-	5.1	+

Noninterest expense:
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits		1,023.7			988.9			899.8		1,004.8			835.8			676.6		3.5	+	8.6	+
Occupancy		116.7			104.2			87.6		81.8			75.3			67.8		12.0	+	11.5	+
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance		73.9			74.4			70.4		67.0			66.7			72.4		.7	-	.4	+
Operations services		70.0			71.9			59.6		59.2			52.2			51.3		2.7	-	6.4	+
Communications and courier		53.2			54.4			47.9		49.1			44.1			41.4		2.1	-	5.2	+
Amortization of intangible assets		11.5			10.7			6.2		5.3			5.0			10.4		7.1	+	2.0	+
All other expense		393.6			322.4			290.3		376.8			323.6			268.8		22.1	+	7.9	+

Total noninterest expense		1,742.6			1,626.9			1,461.8		1,644.0			1,402.7			1,188.7		7.1	+	8.0	+

Income before income taxes		338.1			596.7			628.0		674.5			523.8			435.7		43.3	-	4.9	-
Provision for income taxes		87.3			186.0			197.9		229.3			168.5			149.6		53.1	-	10.2	-

Income from continuing operations		250.8			410.7			430.1		445.2			355.3			286.1		38.9	-	2.6	-
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		210.8			17.1			15.6		7.4			6.6			8.9		NM		NM

Income before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle		461.6			427.8			445.7		452.6			361.9			295.0		7.9	+	9.4	+

Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, net of tax		1.3			(3.1	)		—		—			—			(8.2	)	NM		NM

Net income	$	462.9		$	424.7		$	445.7	$	452.6		$	361.9		$	286.8		9.0	+	10.0	+

Fully taxable equivalent adjustment	$	1.2		$	1.1		$	1.1	$	1.3		$	1.5		$	2.1		9.1	+	10.6	-

Earnings per common share from continuing operations	$	2.02		$	3.27		$	3.45	$	3.51		$	2.80		$	2.24		38.2	-	2.0	-

Earnings per common share before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle	$	3.71		$	3.41		$	3.57	$	3.57		$	2.86		$	2.31		8.8	+	9.9	+

Earnings per common share	$	3.72		$	3.38		$	3.57	$	3.57		$	2.86		$	2.24		10.1	+	10.7	+

Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations	$	1.96		$	3.17		$	3.35	$	3.40		$	2.73		$	2.17		38.2	-	2.0	-

Diluted earnings per common share before cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle	$	3.61		$	3.31		$	3.47	$	3.46		$	2.78		$	2.24		9.1	+	10.0	+

Diluted earnings per common share	$	3.62		$	3.28		$	3.47	$	3.46		$	2.78		$	2.18		10.4	+	10.7	+

* Compound annual growth rate.

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

NM - Due to the variable nature of these items the growth rate is considered to be not meaningful.

118


CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED YIELDS AND RATES (Unaudited)


	2006									2005									Average Balance Growth(%)

	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Average Yields/ Rates			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Average Yields/ Rates
(Fully taxable equivalent) (Dollars in millions)
(Fully taxable equivalent) (Dollars in millions)																			06/05

Assets:
Earning assets:
Loans, net of unearned income**	$	21,504.2		$	1,591.4			7.40	%	$	18,334.7		$	1,133.9			6.18	%		17.3	+
Loans held for sale		4,336.6			288.2			6.64			5,980.1			377.9			6.32			27.5	-
Investment securities:
U.S. Treasuries		56.8			2.7			4.72			41.7			1.1			2.57			36.2	+
U.S. government agencies		3,161.5			173.3			5.48			2,635.3			115.1			4.37			20.0	+
States and municipalities		1.9			—			1.26			4.7			.2			5.01			59.6	-
Other		231.3			11.4			4.94			198.3			8.7			4.39			16.6	+

Total investment securities		3,451.5			187.4			5.43			2,880.0			125.1			4.34			19.8	+

Capital markets securities inventory		2,394.0			127.5			5.33			2,155.6			101.4			4.70			11.1	+
Mortgage banking trading securities		403.0			43.7			10.84			303.5			37.2			12.27			32.8	+
Other earning assets:
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell		1,892.5			90.6			4.79			2,288.0			65.5			2.86			17.3	-
Investment in bank time deposits		30.5			1.5			5.02			8.1			.3			3.47			276.5	+

Total other earning assets		1,923.0			92.1			4.79			2,296.1			65.8			2.87			16.2	-

Total earning assets		34,012.3			2,330.3			6.85			31,950.0			1,841.3			5.76			6.5	+
Allowance for loan losses		(204.7	)								(175.3	)								16.8	+
Cash and due from banks		817.4									752.2									8.7	+
Capital markets receivables		173.1									574.0									69.8	-
Premises and equipment, net		432.3									394.2									9.7	+
Other assets		3,534.2									3,065.3									15.3	+

Total assets/Interest income	$	38,764.6		$	2,330.3					$	36,560.4		$	1,841.3						6.0	+

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Savings	$	3,191.4		$	88.5			2.77	%	$	2,843.1		$	44.4			1.56	%		12.2	+
Time deposits		2,795.3			120.3			4.30			2,242.8			79.0			3.52			24.6	+
Other interest-bearing deposits		1,848.1			24.5			1.32			1,770.5			15.5			.87			4.4	+

Total interest-bearing core deposits		7,834.8			233.3			2.98			6,856.4			138.9			2.03			14.3	+
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more		9,747.7			493.2			5.06			10,896.3			364.1			3.34			10.5	-
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		4,562.9			208.9			4.58			4,582.2			136.6			2.98			.4	-
Capital markets trading liabilities		1,338.9			76.1			5.68			1,519.3			80.2			5.28			11.9	-
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings		795.0			40.0			5.04			994.8			35.3			3.55			20.1	-
Long-term debt		5,062.4			280.7			5.55			2,560.1			101.1			3.96			97.7	+

Total interest-bearing liabilities		29,341.7			1,332.2			4.54			27,409.1			856.2			3.12			7.1	+
Noninterest-bearing deposits		5,169.2									5,263.1									1.8	-
Capital markets payables		231.8									404.0									42.6	-
Other liabilities		1,303.6									1,077.3									21.0	+
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in First Horizon’s junior subordinated debentures (Note 11)		—									—									—
Preferred stock of subsidiary (Note 12)		295.3									229.9									28.4	+
Shareholders’ equity		2,423.0									2,177.0									11.3	+

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity/Interest expense	$	38,764.6		$	1,332.2					$	36,560.4		$	856.2						6.0	+

Net interest income-tax equivalent basis/Yield				$	998.1			2.93	%				$	985.1			3.08	%
Fully taxable equivalent adjustment					(1.2	)								(1.1	)

Net interest income				$	996.9								$	984.0

Net interest spread								2.31	%								2.64	%
Effect of interest-free sources used to fund earning assets								.62									.44

Net interest margin								2.93	%								3.08	%

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.

Yields and corresponding income amounts are adjusted to a fully taxable equivalent. Earning assets yields are expressed net of unearned income.

Rates are expressed net of unamortized debenture cost for long-term debt. Net interest margin is computed using total net interest income.

119



2004									2003									2002									2001									Average Balance Growth(%)

Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Average Yields/ Rates			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Average Yields/ Rates			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Average Yields/ Rates			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Average Yields/ Rates

																																				06/01*


$	15,440.5		$	775.1			5.02	%	$	12,679.8		$	658.1			5.19	%	$	10,645.6		$	666.6			6.26	%	$	10,118.8		$	812.5			8.03	%		16.3	+
	4,123.5			226.8			5.50			4,397.2			229.1			5.21			3,013.1			184.0			6.11			2,373.5			165.9			6.99			12.8	+

	48.4			.8			1.67			45.3			.7			1.62			55.5			1.7			3.04			31.5			1.6			4.98			12.5	+
	2,194.9			95.6			4.35			2,107.6			88.7			4.21			1,819.7			106.8			5.87			1,781.0			116.5			6.54			12.2	+
	10.8			.7			6.52			22.1			1.5			6.80			34.9			2.5			7.30			50.8			3.8			7.53			48.2	-
	195.0			7.7			3.96			369.9			21.0			5.69			556.3			32.8			5.89			732.0			47.5			6.49			20.6	-

	2,449.1			104.8			4.28			2,544.9			111.9			4.40			2,466.4			143.8			5.83			2,595.3			169.4			6.53			5.9	+

	753.1			26.8			3.56			894.3			33.7			3.76			734.4			31.2			4.25			681.9			36.6			5.37			28.6	+
	221.3			26.7			12.05			154.7			16.9			10.94			131.3			12.6			9.55			127.5			12.1			9.48			25.9	+

	722.2			7.6			1.06			656.3			4.9			.75			404.8			5.4			1.35			226.5			7.0			3.07			52.9	+
	8.6			.1			1.04			1.7			.1			.82			1.8			.1			2.07			1.9			.1			6.56			74.2	+

	730.8			7.7			1.06			658.0			5.0			.75			406.6			5.5			1.35			228.4			7.1			3.10			53.1	+

	23,718.3			1,167.9			4.92			21,328.9			1,054.7			4.94			17,397.4			1,043.7			6.00			16,125.4			1,203.6			7.46			16.1	+
	(165.2	)								(160.3	)								(151.2	)								(145.2	)								7.1	+
	739.2									748.3									775.3									756.5									1.6	+
	212.2									460.1									256.2									208.2									3.6	-
	364.4									300.7									246.3									268.7									10.0	+
	2,436.9									2,455.9									2,180.0									2,013.6									11.9	+

$	27,305.8		$	1,167.9					$	25,133.6		$	1,054.7					$	20,704.0		$	1,043.7					$	19,227.2		$	1,203.6						15.1	+


$	2,614.4		$	19.6			.75	%	$	2,532.7		$	19.8			.78	%	$	2,537.0		$	33.1			1.30	%	$	2,589.4		$	76.8			2.97	%		4.3	+
	1,947.0			60.1			3.08			1,866.3			57.1			3.06			1,937.1			71.2			3.68			2,092.3			111.1			5.31			6.0	+
	1,525.5			4.8			.32			1,433.1			3.8			.26			1,323.2			6.2			.47			1,263.2			11.9			.94			7.9	+

	6,086.9			84.5			1.39			5,832.1			80.7			1.38			5,797.3			110.5			1.91			5,944.9			199.8			3.36			5.7	+
	6,875.3			108.0			1.57			5,165.5			69.4			1.34			3,843.0			79.8			2.08			3,142.7			137.1			4.36			25.4	+

	3,685.2			45.1			1.22			3,712.7			36.9			.99			3,134.3			45.5			1.45			3,162.7			115.6			3.66			7.6	+
	527.0			20.0			3.80			547.1			22.1			4.04			360.3			16.0			4.44			190.2			10.1			5.34			47.7	+
	136.7			2.7			1.96			151.1			3.1			2.06			177.1			6.2			3.50			375.1			19.8			5.27			16.2	+
	2,248.0			50.2			2.24			1,342.9			35.4			2.64			685.5			28.6			4.17			521.5			30.2			5.79			57.6	+

	19,559.1			310.5			1.59			16,751.4			247.6			1.48			13,997.5			286.6			2.05			13,337.1			512.6			3.84			17.1	+
	4,673.3									5,114.0									4,034.5									3,453.0									8.4	+
	174.9									401.5									193.4									182.7									4.9	+
	960.3									915.1									741.8									687.4									13.7	+

	—									100.0									100.0									100.0									100.0	-
	.5									22.2									44.3									44.0									46.3	+
	1,937.7									1,829.4									1,592.5									1,423.0									11.2	+

$	27,305.8		$	310.5					$	25,133.6		$	247.6					$	20,704.0		$	286.6					$	19,227.2		$	512.6						15.1	+

			$	857.4			3.62	%				$	807.1			3.78	%				$	757.1			4.35	%				$	691.0			4.29	%
				(1.1	)								(1.3	)								(1.5	)								(2.1	)

			$	856.3								$	805.8								$	755.6								$	688.9

							3.33	%								3.46	%								3.95	%								3.62	%
							.29									.32									.40									.67

							3.62	%								3.78	%								4.35	%								4.29	%

*	Compound annual growth rate
**	Includes loans on nonaccrual status.
NM - The growth rate is considered to be not meaningful.

120

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate future filings by reference, including the annual report on Form l0-K or the proxy statement, in whole or in part, the following "Information Concerning Certain Officer Certifications" is not a component of any such filings and shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings. It is disclosed in our annual report to shareholders and accompanies our proxy statement in accordance with applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

Information Concerning Certain Officer Certifications

Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer each year make certain certifications that are included as Exhibits 31(a) and 31(b) to our annual report on Form 10-K which is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

A copy of our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, is available free of charge to each shareholder of record upon written request to the treasurer, First Horizon National Corporation, P.O. Box 84, Memphis, Tennessee 38101. Each such written request must set forth a good faith representation that as of the record date specified in the notice of our 2007 annual shareholders meeting the person making the request was a beneficial owner of a security entitled to vote at the annual meeting of shareholders. The exhibits to the annual report on Form 10-K also will be supplied upon written request to the treasurer and payment to us of the cost of furnishing the requested exhibit or exhibits. That report (including Exhibits 31(a) and 31(b)) also is available to the public without charge through the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

In addition, shortly after our 2006 shareholders meeting, our chief executive officer submitted a certification to the New York Stock Exchange concerning our compliance with certain listing requirements related to corporate governance. That certification contained no qualifications.

121

Total Shareholder Return Performance Graph

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate future filings by reference, in whole or in part, the following Total Shareholder Return Performance Graph shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return with returns based on the Standard and Poor's 500 index and a peer group consisting of the top 30 bank holding companies in the U.S. based on asset size as reported in the American Banker (Top 30).


	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006

First Horizon National Corp	$100.00	$101.88	$128.41	$130.18	$121.27	$137.49
Top 30 Banks	100.00	93.70	126.75	140.10	144.19	170.14
S&P 500 Index	100.00	76.63	96.85	105.56	108.73	123.54

The preceding graph assumes $100 is invested on December 31, 2001 and dividends are reinvested. Returns are market-capitalization weighted.

The Top 30 consists of the following (with First Horizon excluded): Citigroup, Inc., Bank of America Corporation, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wachovia Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company, U.S. Bancorp, SunTrust Banks, Inc., Capital One Financial Corporation, Regions Financial Corporation, National City Corporation, BB&T Corporation, State Street Corporation, Bank of New York Company, Inc., PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Fifth Third Bancorp, KeyCorp, Northern Trust Corporation, Comerica Incorporated, M&T Bank Corporation, Marshall & Ilsley Corporation, UnionBanCal Corporation, Popular, Inc., Zions Bancorporation, Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Mellon Financial Corporation, TD Banknorth Inc., Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, Compass Bancshares, Inc., and Synovus Financial Corp.

122

Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES

The following are lists of consolidated subsidiaries of First Horizon National Corporation (“FHNC”) and of First Tennessee Bank National Association (“FTBNA”), information concerning a consolidated entity not controlled by FHNC, and information concerning certain unconsolidated entities, all at December 31, 2006. Each consolidated entity is 100% owned by its immediate parent, except as described below in note (2) to the FHNC table and notes (1) and (3) to the FTBNA table, and all are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Direct Consolidated Entities of FHNC :
	Type of	Jurisdiction of
	Ownership	Incorporation/
Entity	by FHNC	Organization
First Tennessee Bank National Association (1)	Direct	United States
Hickory Capital Corporation	Direct	Tennessee
Highland Capital Management Corp.	Direct	Tennessee
Martin & Company, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
Mountain Financial Company*	Direct	Tennessee
Norlen Life Insurance Company	Direct	Arizona
WTB Capital Trust (2)	Direct	Delaware

*	Inactive at December 31, 2006.

(1)	At December 31, 2006, 300,000 shares of non-voting preferred stock issued by this subsidiary are outstanding and are not owned by FHNC. That preferred stock has an aggregate liquidation preference amount of $300,000,000 and is not participating with the common stock in the event of liquidation. Divisions of this subsidiary do business in certain jurisdictions under the following names: First Express, First Horizon, First Horizon Bank, First Horizon Equity Lending, People’s Bank, FTN Financial Capital Markets, Gulf Pacific Mortgage, First Horizon Money Center, and First Tennessee Advisory Services.

(2)	This consolidated entity is a Delaware statutory business trust. FHNC owns all of the preferred (nonvoting) interests in the trust, but none of the common (voting) interests. The preferred interests represent approximately 97% of the total interests measured by stated liquidation amounts.

Consolidated Subsidiaries of FTBNA :
	Type of	Jurisdiction of
	Ownership	Incorporation/
Subsidiary of FTBNA	by FTBNA	Organization
Check Consultants, Incorporated*	Direct	Tennessee
Community Money Center, Inc.*	Direct	Tennessee
First Express Remittance Processing, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
First Horizon ABS Trust 2006 – HE1 (1)	Direct	Delaware
First Horizon ABS Trust 2006 – HE2 (1)	Direct	Delaware
First Horizon Insurance Services, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
First Horizon Mint Distribution, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
First Horizon Money Center, Inc.*	Direct	Tennessee
First Horizon Msaver, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
Hickory Venture Capital Corporation	Direct	Alabama

JPO, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
JV Mortgage Solutions LLC (1)	Direct	Delaware
FHMSH, Inc. (4)	Direct	Delaware
FT Mortgage Holding Corporation (4)	Direct	Delaware
Federal Flood Certification Corporation	Indirect	Texas
FT Reinsurance Company	Indirect	South Carolina
FT Real Estate Information Mortgage Solutions Holdings, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
FT Real Estate Information Mortgage Solutions, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
Total Mortgage Solutions, LP (1)	Indirect	Delaware
First Horizon Home Loan Corporation (2) (4)	Indirect	Kansas
First Horizon Asset Securities, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
First Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc.	Indirect	Tennessee
FHREC, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
FHRIV, LLC	Indirect	Delaware
FHR Holding, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
FHRV, LLC	Indirect	Delaware
FHRVI, LLC	Indirect	Delaware
First Horizon Merchant Services, Inc.	Indirect	Tennessee
FHEL, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
FHTOF, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
First Horizon Mortgage Loan Corporation	Indirect	Delaware
FT Real Estate Securities Company, Inc.	Indirect	Arkansas
FHRIII, LLC	Indirect	Delaware
FHTRS, Inc.	Indirect	Delaware
FH-FF Mortgage Services, L.P. (3)	Indirect	Delaware
First Tennessee ABS, Inc.*	Direct	Delaware
First Tennessee Brokerage, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
First Tennessee Equipment Finance Corporation	Direct	Tennessee
First Tennessee Housing Corporation	Direct	Tennessee
CC Community Development Holdings, Inc.	Indirect	Tennessee
First Tennessee Insurance Services, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
First Tennessee Merchant Equipment, Inc.*	Direct	Tennessee
FT Building, LLC	Direct	Tennessee
FT Insurance Corporation	Direct	Alabama
FTN Financial Capital Assets Corporation	Direct	Tennessee
FTN Financial Securities Corp.	Direct	Tennessee
FTN Financial Securitization Corporation	Direct	Delaware
FTN Investment Corp.	Direct	Delaware
FTN Midwest Securities Corp.	Direct	Delaware
FTN Midwest Asset Management Corp.	Indirect	Delaware
FTN Premium Services, Inc.	Direct	Tennessee
FTN Ramp, LLC*	Direct	Delaware
Synaxis Group, Inc.	Direct	Delaware
SFSR, Inc.*	Indirect	Tennessee

Employers Risk Services, Inc.*	Indirect	Kentucky
Merritt & McKenzie, Inc.	Indirect	Georgia
Polk & Sullivan Group, Inc.	Indirect	Tennessee
Synaxis Insurance Services, Inc.	Indirect	Tennessee
Synaxis Risk Services, Inc.	Indirect	Tennessee
Van Meter Insurance, Inc.*	Indirect	Kentucky

*	Inactive at December 31, 2006.

(1)	The following consolidated subsidiaries are not wholly-owned directly or indirectly by FHNC:

	JV Mortgage Solutions, LLC	First Tennessee Bank National Association owns 50%.

	Total Mortgage Solutions, LP	FT Real Estate Information Mortgage Solutions, Inc. owns 49.5% and JV Mortgage Solutions, LLC owns 1%.

	First Horizon ABS Trust 2006-HE1 and First Horizon ABS Trust 2006-HE2 are trusts to which FTBNA transferred certain assets. Those trusts have issued debt securities secured by those assets. FTBNA retains certain rights as transferor.

(2)	Divisions of this subsidiary do business in certain jurisdictions under the following names: First Horizon Home Loans, First Tennessee Home Loans, and First Horizon Lending Center.

(3)	The following subsidiaries are not wholly-owned by their immediate parent:

	FH-FF Mortgage Services, L.P.	FHTRS, Inc. owns a 99% limited partnership interest and First Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc. owns a 1% general partnership interest.

(4)

After December 31, 2006, applications were filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency seeking approval of a corporate reorganization where the following subsidiaries would be consolidated into FTBNA: FHMSH, Inc.; FT Mortgage Holding Corporation; and First Horizon Home Loan Corporation. At the time of the filing of this Exhibit, those applications are pending.

Selected Unconsolidated Entities :

FHNC owns 100% of the common securities of the following unconsolidated entities:

First Tennessee Capital I, a Delaware business trust

First Tennessee Capital II, a Delaware business trust

Exhibit 23

[Logo]

KPMG LLP

Suite 900, Morgan Keegan Tower

Fifty North Front Street

Memphis, TN 38103

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

First Horizon National Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the previously filed registration statements Nos. 33-9846, 33-40398, 33-44142, 33-52561, 33-57241, 33-63809, 33-64471, 333-16225, 333-16227, 333-17457, 333-17457-01, 333-17457-02, 333-17457-03, 333-17457-04, 333-70075, 333-91137, 333-92145, 333-92147, 333-56052, 333-73440, 333-73442, 333-106015, 333-108738, 333-108750, 333-109862, 333-110845, 333-123372, 333-123404, 333-124297, 333-124299, and 333-133635 of First Horizon National Corporation (the Company) of our reports dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the Company's consolidated statements of condition as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports are incorporated by reference into the Company's 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our report refers to changes in accounting for share-based payments, servicing rights, and defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Memphis, Tennessee

February 26, 2007

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the

U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a

Swiss cooperative

Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below does hereby constitute and appoint MARLIN L. MOSBY, III, JAMES F. KEEN, CLYDE A. BILLINGS, JR., and MILTON A. GUTELIUS, JR., jointly and each of them severally, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to execute and sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, by First Horizon National Corporation (“Corporation”) and, further, to execute and sign any and all amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all the acts that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ J. Kenneth Glass	Chairman of the Board, President and	January 16, 2007
J. Kenneth Glass	Chief Executive Officer and a Director
	(principal executive officer)


	Executive Vice President and Chief
Marlin L. Mosby, III	Financial Officer (principal financial officer)


	Executive Vice President and Corporate
James F. Keen	Controller (principal accounting officer)


/s/ Robert C. Blattberg	Director	January 16, 2007
Robert C. Blattberg


/s/ Simon F. Cooper	Director	January 16, 2007
Simon F. Cooper



/s/ James A. Haslam III	Director	January 16, 2007
James A. Haslam, III


/s/ R. Brad Martin	Director	January 16, 2007
R. Brad Martin


/s/ Vicki R. Palmer	Director	January 16, 2007
Vicki R. Palmer


/s/ Colin V. Reed	Director	January 16, 2007
Colin V. Reed


/s/ Michael D. Rose	Director	January 16, 2007
Michael D. Rose


/s/ Mary F. Sammons	Director	January 16, 2007
Mary F. Sammons


/s/ William B. Sansom	Director	January 16, 2007
William B. Sansom


/s/ Luke Yancy III	Director	January 16, 2007
Luke Yancy III

Exhibit 24.2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Gerald L. Baker	Chief Executive Officer, President and	February 28, 2007
Gerald L. Baker	a Director (principal executive officer)

/s/ Marlin L. Mosby, III	Executive Vice President and Chief	February 28, 2007
Marlin L. Mosby, III	Financial Officer (principal financial officer)

/s/ James F. Keen	Executive Vice President and Corporate	February 28, 2007
James F. Keen	Controller (principal accounting officer)

/s/ Michael D. Rose	Chairman of the Board and a Director	February 28, 2007
Michael D. Rose

/s/ J. Kenneth Glass	Director	February 28, 2007
J. Kenneth Glass

Exhibit 31(a)

FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION

RULE 13a – 14(a) CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(ANNUAL REPORT)

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gerald L. Baker, President and Chief Executive Officer of First Horizon National Corporation, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Horizon National Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date	February 28, 2007

/s/ Gerald L. Baker

Gerald L. Baker

President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31(b)

FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION

RULE 13a – 14(a) CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(ANNUAL REPORT)

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Marlin L. Mosby III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Horizon National Corporation, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Horizon National Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date	February 28, 2007

/s/ Marlin L. Mosby III

Marlin L. Mosby III

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

18 USC 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

As Codified at 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned Gerald L. Baker, President and Chief Executive Officer of First Horizon National Corporation (“Corporation”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as follows:

1.	The Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Dated: February 28, 2007

/s/ Gerald L. Baker

Gerald L. Baker

President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

18 USC 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

As Codified at 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned Marlin L. Mosby III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Horizon National Corporation (“Corporation”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as follows:

1.	The Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Dated: February 28, 2007

/s/ Marlin L. Mosby III

Marlin L. Mosby III
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

* Net of unearned income.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.