Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
or
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number: 0-24274
LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
Delaware   33-0361285
(State or Other Jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)   Identification No.)
     
6455 Nancy Ridge Drive
San Diego, CA

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  92121
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (858) 452-6600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding at October 26, 2005 was 74,152,686.
 
 

 


LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
INDEX
         
       
 
       
       
 
       
    1  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    12  
 
       
    12  
 
       
       
 
       
    13  
 
       
    17  
  EXHIBIT 10.5
  EXHIBIT 31.1
  EXHIBIT 31.2
  EXHIBIT 32.1

 


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED
LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2005     2004  
 
  (Unaudited)   (See Note)
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,872     $ 2,861  
Short-term investments
    13,818       20,204  
Other current assets
    776       783  
 
           
Total current assets
    16,466       23,848  
 
Property and equipment, net
    4,519       6,059  
Patent costs and other assets, net
    3,105       3,119  
 
           
 
Total assets
  $ 24,090     $ 33,026  
 
           
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 489     $ 1,455  
Accrued clinical/regulatory expenses
    260       647  
Accrued expenses
    1,370       2,061  
Accrued payroll and related expenses
    601       1,210  
Current portion of obligations under capital leases
          14  
Current portion of obligations under notes payable
    646       922  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    3,366       6,309  
 
Noncurrent portion of obligations under notes payable
    228       716  
 
Commitments:
               
 
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Common stock
    742       615  
Additional paid-in capital
    274,026       258,358  
Other comprehensive loss
          (23 )
Accumulated deficit
    (254,272 )     (232,949 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    20,496       26,001  
 
           
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 24,090     $ 33,026  
 
           
Note: The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
See accompanying notes.

1


Table of Contents

LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Expenses:
                               
Research and development
  $ 4,969     $ 10,656     $ 17,499     $ 24,268  
General and administrative
    1,081       2,280       4,224       5,452  
 
                       
 
                               
Total expenses
    6,050       12,936       21,723       29,720  
 
                               
 
                       
Loss from operations
    (6,050 )     (12,936 )     (21,723 )     (29,720 )
Interest income, net
    123       104       400       145  
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (5,927 )   $ (12,832 )   $ (21,323 )   $ (29,575 )
 
                       
 
                               
Basic and diluted net loss per share
  $ (.08 )   $ (.21 )   $ (.29 )   $ (.50 )
 
                       
 
                               
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share
    74,041       61,310       72,467       59,135  
 
                       
See accompanying notes.

2


Table of Contents

LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2005     2004  
Operating activities:
               
Net loss
  $ (21,323 )   $ (29,575 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    1,593       1,542  
Loss on write-off/disposal of patents, other assets and property and equipment
    371       81  
Stock compensation expense
    6       119  
Accretion of interest income
    (27 )     22  
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Other current assets
    7       (8 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (1,657 )     3,553  
Accrued clinical/regulatory expenses
    (387 )     369  
Accrued payroll and related expenses
    (609 )     (572 )
 
           
 
               
Net cash used for operating activities
    (22,026 )     (24,469 )
Investing activities:
               
Purchases of short-term investments
    (23,800 )     (35,865 )
Sales of short-term investments
    30,236       31,750  
Additions to property and equipment
    (122 )     (1,483 )
Increase in patent costs and other assets
    (288 )     (517 )
 
           
 
               
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
    6,026       (6,115 )
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
    15,789       29,795  
Payments on obligations under capital leases
    (14 )     (66 )
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable
          478  
Payments on notes payable
    (764 )     (658 )
 
           
 
               
Net cash provided by financing activities
    15,011       29,549  
 
               
 
           
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (989 )     (1,035 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    2,861       4,021  
 
           
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 1,872     $ 2,986  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
               
Interest paid
  $ 98     $ 148  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
               
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments
  $ 23     $ 16  
 
           
See accompanying notes.

3


Table of Contents

LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2005
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other quarters or the year ended December 31, 2005. For more complete financial information, these condensed consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2. Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures made in the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation
As allowed under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation , the Company has elected to continue to account for stock option grants in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations (“APB 25”). The Company generally grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees and directors with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant and therefore, under APB 25, recognizes no compensation expense for such stock option grants.
Pro forma information regarding net loss and net loss per share is required by SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123 requires that the information be determined as if the Company has accounted for awards granted under its employee stock plans after December 31, 1994 under the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123. The fair value of the options granted was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options.

4


Table of Contents

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of options is expensed over the options’ vesting period. The Company’s pro forma information is set forth below (in thousands, except for net loss per share information):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Net loss as reported
  $ (5,927 )   $ (12,832 )   $ (21,323 )   $ (29,575 )
Less: Stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards
    (759 )     (1,713 )     (2,988 )     (5,190 )
     
Pro forma net loss
  $ (6,686 )   $ (14,545 )   $ (24,311 )   $ (34,765 )
     
Basic and diluted net loss per share as reported
  $ (0.08 )   $ (0.21 )   $ (0.29 )   $ (0.50 )
     
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share
  $ (0.09 )   $ (0.24 )   $ (0.34 )   $ (0.59 )
     
The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 for either recognizing compensation expense or providing pro forma disclosures may not be representative of the effects on reported net loss for future periods.
Options or stock awards issued to non-employees (other than non-employee directors) have been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services . Options granted to non-employees (other than non-employee directors) are periodically remeasured as the options vest.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share . Because the Company has incurred a net loss for all periods presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, stock options are not included in the computation of net loss per share because their effect is anti-dilutive.
Comprehensive Loss
In accordance with SFAS No. 130 , Reporting Comprehensive Income (Loss) , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included in other comprehensive income (loss). The Company’s comprehensive net loss totaled $5,927,000 and $12,804,000 for the three-month periods and $21,300,000 and $29,559,000 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
3. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment , which is a revision of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB 25 and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows . Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees and non-employee directors, including grants of stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values and requires the use of an option pricing model for estimating fair value, which is amortized to expense over the service periods. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. On April 14, 2005, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for SFAS No. 123R. In accordance with the new rule, the accounting provisions of SFAS No. 123R will be effective for the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company expects to adopt SFAS

5


Table of Contents

No. 123R on January 1, 2006. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on the amounts of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R for the period ended September 30, 2005, the net loss would have been increased by approximately $0.8 million and $3.0 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005, respectively. SFAS No. 123R allows for either prospective recognition of compensation expense or retrospective recognition, which may extend back to the original issuance of SFAS No. 123 or only to interim periods in the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating these transition methods.
4. Restructuring Charges
In March 2005, the Company restructured its operations in order to reduce costs. In accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, as of September 30, 2005, the Company recorded total restructuring charges of approximately $1.5 million in connection with the termination of 60 employees (approximately $1.2 million), the impairment of certain long-term assets (approximately $0.1 million), and retention payments for key executives (approximately $0.2 million). This action followed an announcement by the Company that, based on the outcome of a meeting with the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), the Company’s lead drug candidate, Riquent â , was unlikely to receive accelerated approval under the FDA’s Subpart H regulation.
Approximately $1.0 million of the total restructuring charges was included in research and development expense and approximately $0.5 million was included in general and administrative expense.
As of September 30, 2005, the Company had paid all of the $1.4 million cash restructuring charges (consisting of approximately $1.2 million in severance and related costs and $0.2 million in retention payments for key executives). Cash payments in the third quarter of 2005 were for severance and related charges ($0.2 million) and retention payments for key executives ($0.2 million). The non-cash charge of $0.1 million for write-downs of impaired assets as a result of the restructuring was included in research and development expense in the first quarter of 2005.
5. Changes in Securities
In February 2005, the Company sold 12,250,000 shares of its common stock in a public offering for net proceeds of approximately $15.8 million.
6. Subsequent Event
On October 6, 2005, the Company entered into a definitive agreement for the sale of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock to selected institutional and other accredited investors for gross proceeds of approximately $66 million, subject to stockholder approval and other closing conditions. The special stockholder meeting is scheduled for December 2, 2005.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
     The forward-looking statements in this report involve significant risks and uncertainties, and a number of factors, both foreseen and unforeseen, could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. Forward-looking statements include those that express a plan, belief, expectation, estimation, anticipation, intent, contingency, future development or similar expression. The analyses of clinical results of Riquent, previously known as LJP 394, our drug candidate for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (“lupus”) and any other drug candidate that we may develop, including the results of any trials that are ongoing or that we may initiate in the future, could result in a finding that these drug candidates are not effective in large patient populations, do not provide a meaningful clinical benefit, or may reveal a potential safety issue requiring us to develop new candidates. The analysis of the data from our Phase 3 trial of Riquent showed that the trial did not reach statistical significance with respect to its primary endpoint, time to renal flare, or with respect to its secondary endpoint, time to treatment with high-dose corticosteroids or cyclophosphamide. The results from our clinical trials of Riquent, including the results of any trials that are ongoing or that we may initiate in the future, may not ultimately be sufficient to obtain regulatory clearance to market Riquent either in the United States or Europe, and we may be required to conduct additional clinical studies to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Riquent in order to obtain marketing approval. There can be no assurance, however, that we will have the necessary resources to complete any current or future trials or that any such trials will sufficiently demonstrate the

6


Table of Contents

safety and efficacy of Riquent. Our blood test to measure the binding affinity for Riquent is experimental, has not been validated by independent laboratories and will likely be reviewed as part of the Riquent approval process. Our other potential drug candidates are at earlier stages of development and involve comparable risks. Analysis of our clinical trials could have negative or inconclusive results. Any positive results observed to date may not be indicative of future results. In any event, regulatory authorities may require clinical trials in addition to our current clinical trial, or may not approve our drugs. Our ability to develop and sell our products in the future may be adversely affected by the intellectual property rights of third parties. Additional risk factors include the uncertainty and timing of: our clear need for additional financing or a collaborative agreement; obtaining required regulatory approvals, including delays associated with any approvals that we may obtain; our ability to pass all necessary FDA inspections; the further development of our manufacturing capabilities for clinical studies and possible commercialization; successfully marketing and selling our products; our lack of manufacturing, marketing and sales experience; our ability to make use of the orphan drug designation for Riquent; generating future revenue from product sales or other sources such as collaborative relationships; future profitability; and our dependence on patents and other proprietary rights. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance upon forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof. Interested parties are urged to review the risks described in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, and in other reports and registration statements that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.
Developments in 2005
     On February 2, 2005, we announced that we had completed a public offering of 12,250,000 shares of our common stock. The net proceeds to us, after expenses, were approximately $15.8 million.
     On March 14, 2005, we announced that, based on the outcome of a meeting with the FDA, Riquent was unlikely to receive accelerated approval under the FDA’s Subpart H regulation. We currently plan to continue the ongoing clinical benefit trial and expect to continue discussions with the FDA about ways to enhance the trial, including, as previously announced, the addition of a higher dose to the study.
     On March 29, 2005, we announced that we were implementing a restructuring plan to reduce our costs. The restructuring plan included a workforce reduction of 60 employees, leaving a current post-restructuring workforce of 86 employees. Under the plan, we are continuing our ongoing clinical benefit trial of Riquent without any significant additional patient enrollment or site expansion and are continuing our small molecule inflammation program. We also are continuing activities that would allow a filing of a Marketing Authorization Application (the “MAA”) in Europe. The termination benefits, primarily severance costs, were approximately $1.5 million, of which approximately $1.3 million was recorded in the first quarter and the remainder of which was recorded in the second quarter.
     On April 28, 2005, we announced that we had received a notice from the Nasdaq Stock Market indicating that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(5) (the “Minimum Bid Price Rule”) because, as of the date of the notice, the bid price of our common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. In accordance with the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, we had 180 calendar days, or until October 24, 2005, to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Rule. On October 25, 2005, we received a letter from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department indicating that we were not in compliance with the minimum $1.00 bid price requirement for continued listing pursuant to Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(5) and are subject to delisting. We have scheduled a hearing date with the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel for December 1, 2005, which automatically stays the delisting of our common stock pending the Panel’s review and determination. However, we can give no assurances that the Panel will grant our request for continued listing.
     On May 31, 2005, we announced that we had received “fast track” designation for Riquent for the treatment of lupus renal disease from the FDA. The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and to expedite the review of new drugs that are intended to treat serious or life threatening conditions and that demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need.

7


Table of Contents

     On October 7, 2005, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement for the sale of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock to selected institutional and other accredited investors for gross proceeds of approximately $66 million, subject to stockholder approval and other closing conditions. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we will issue an aggregate of 88 million shares of newly-issued common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 22 million shares of common stock to Essex Woodlands Health Ventures Fund VI, LP, Frazier Healthcare Ventures, Mr. Alejandro Gonzalez, Special Situations Funds, Domain Public Equity Partners, LP, and Sutter Hill Ventures. The warrants to be issued at the closing will be immediately exercisable when issued, will have an exercise price of $1.00 per share and will remain exercisable for five years. In addition to the warrants issued at the closing, the investors are entitled to receive additional but conditional warrants to purchase an amount of common stock equal to an aggregate of 5% of our outstanding shares as of October 6, 2005. The conditional warrants will become exercisable in the event that the Company completes a financing transaction other than the proposed transaction, the stockholders do not approve the proposed transaction, the proposed transaction is not closed prior to December 30, 2005, or certain extraordinary transactions occur. Upon the closing of the proposed transaction, the additional warrants, if issued, will become void and of no effect. In connection with seeking stockholder approval of the transaction, we expect to seek stockholder approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, to amend our current equity incentive plan to, among other matters, increase the number of shares available for grant under the plan, and to approve a reverse stock split of five for one. The special stockholder meeting will be held on December 2, 2005.
     On October 18, 2005, we announced the status of our development program for Riquent, which included an overview of the ongoing clinical benefit trial, a regulatory update and a discussion of our goals for the upcoming 12 months. Among other matters, we announced our goals for the next 12 months which include completing the recently announced financing in December 2005, restarting enrollment in the United States for Riquent’s Phase 3 trial early in 2006 after a final review of the revised protocol by the FDA, expanding the study to Europe and Asia, submitting the MAA for Europe in the first half of 2006, and obtaining data on the ability of higher doses of Riquent to reduce further the levels of antibodies to dsDNA around the end of next year. In addition, we expect to be able to conduct an interim analysis for efficacy at a point in time when approximately 70% of the projected number of renal flares has been observed.
Overview
     In light of the outcome of a meeting with the FDA in March 2005, at which we learned that it is unlikely that we would receive accelerated approval for Riquent under the FDA’s Subpart H regulation, we will need to successfully complete the ongoing clinical benefit study of Riquent, which we commenced in August 2004, prior to any FDA approval decisions. We expect that the ongoing clinical benefit trial will involve approximately 500 to 600 patients, may cost at least $60 million, and will take several years to complete. If we do not receive funding from the sale of securities or a collaborative partner or obtain other financing in the near future, we will not have sufficient resources to complete the ongoing clinical benefit trial. On October 6, 2005, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement that provides for the sale of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock to selected institutional and other accredited investors for gross proceeds of approximately $66 million. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we will issue an aggregate of 88 million shares of newly-issued common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 22 million shares of common stock to Essex Woodlands Health Ventures Fund VI, LP, Frazier Healthcare Ventures, Mr. Alejandro Gonzalez, Special Situations Funds, Domain Public Equity Partners, LP, and Sutter Hill Ventures. The sale of securities is expected to close in December 2005, and is subject to stockholder approval, remaining listed on either the Nasdaq National Market or the Nasdaq Capital Market, and other customary closing conditions. For additional information about our current financial resources, please refer to the discussion below under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
     Since our inception in May 1989, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to the research and development of technology and potential drugs to treat antibody-mediated diseases. We have never generated any revenue from product sales and have relied on public and private offerings of securities, revenue from collaborative agreements, equipment financings and interest income on invested

8


Table of Contents

cash balances for our working capital. Based on the results of the FDA’s prior review of our New Drug Application (“NDA”) for Riquent, and depending on the outcome of our further discussions with the FDA and other regulatory agencies and our continuing analysis of the data from our clinical trials of Riquent, our research and development expenses may increase significantly in the future should we obtain additional funding. For example, we have initiated a clinical trial of Riquent that the FDA has indicated appears to satisfy the requirement that we conduct an additional randomized, double-blind study. This study is expected to involve approximately 500 to 600 patients, may cost at least $60 million, and is expected to take several years to complete. In addition, our research and development expenses may increase if we initiate any additional clinical studies of Riquent or if we increase our activities related to any additional drug candidates. Our activities to date are not as broad in depth or scope as the activities we may undertake in the future, and our historical operations and the financial information included in this report are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results or financial condition.
     We expect our net loss to fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of the timing of expenses incurred and the revenues earned from any potential collaborative arrangements we may establish. Some of these fluctuations may be significant. As of September 30, 2005, our accumulated deficit was approximately $254.3 million.
     Our business is subject to significant risks, including, but not limited to, our clear need for additional financing or a collaborative partner, the risks inherent in research and development efforts, including clinical trials, the lengthy, expensive and uncertain process of seeking regulatory approvals, uncertainties associated with both obtaining and enforcing patents, the potential enforcement of the patent rights of others against us, uncertainties regarding government reforms regarding product pricing and reimbursement levels, technological change, competition, manufacturing uncertainties, our lack of marketing experience, the uncertainty of receiving future revenue from product sales or other sources such as collaborative relationships, and the uncertainty of future profitability. Even if our product candidates appear promising at an early stage of development, they may not reach the market for numerous reasons, including the possibilities that the products will be ineffective or unsafe during clinical trials, will fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals, will be difficult to manufacture on a large scale, will be uneconomical to market or will be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties or competing products.
Results of Operations
     For the three months ended September 30, 2005, research and development expenses decreased to $5.0 million from $10.7 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in expenses related to the purchase of raw materials for the production of Riquent. In addition, there were cost savings related to the termination of 44 research and development personnel in connection with the March 2005 restructuring. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, research and development expenses decreased to $17.5 million from $24.3 million for the same period in 2004 primarily due to a decrease in expenses related to the purchase of raw materials as noted above. There was also a decrease in consulting and professional outside services resulting from the decrease in activity.
     Research and development expense of $5.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 consisted of $3.9 million for lupus research and development related expense and $1.1 million for other research and development related expense. There were no expenses related to thrombosis research and development in the third quarter. Research and development expense of $17.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 consisted of $14.4 million for lupus research and development related expense, $0.5 million for thrombosis research and development related expense, and $2.6 million for other research and development related expense. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, total lupus research and development expense consisted primarily of salaries, severance and other costs related to research, manufacturing and clinical personnel, costs related to the clinical studies of Riquent, and consulting and professional outside services. Total thrombosis related research and development expense consisted primarily of salaries and severance for research and development personnel. Total other research and development expense consisted primarily of salaries, severance and other costs related to research and development personnel, research supplies, rent and lease expense, and consulting and professional outside services.

9


Table of Contents

     Our research and development expense may increase significantly in the future if we obtain additional funding. For example, we have initiated a clinical trial of Riquent that the FDA has indicated appears to satisfy the requirement that we conduct an additional randomized, double-blind study. This study is expected to involve approximately 500 to 600 patients, may cost at least $60 million, and is expected to take several years to complete. Additionally, our research and development expenses may increase significantly if we initiate any additional clinical studies of Riquent or if we increase our activities related to the development of additional drug candidates.
     For the three months ended September 30, 2005, general and administrative expense decreased to $1.1 million from $2.3 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in consulting fees for pre-marketing and other general corporate activities. In addition, there were cost savings related to the termination of 16 general and administrative personnel in connection with the March 2005 restructuring. General and administrative expenses decreased to $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 from $5.5 million for the same period in 2004. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in consulting fees noted above, partially offset by the cost of termination benefits, mainly severance, of approximately $0.5 million, in connection with the termination of 16 general and administrative personnel. If we obtain additional funding, general and administrative expense may increase in the future to support clinical trials and possible increases in manufacturing and research and development activities.
     Interest income, net was $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004. Interest income, net increased to $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 from $0.1 million for the same period in 2004 due to higher average interest rates in 2005 compared to 2004 and realized losses on the sale of investments recognized in the first quarter of 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     From inception through September 30, 2005, we have incurred a cumulative net loss of approximately $254.3 million and have financed our operations through private and public offerings of securities, revenues from collaborative agreements, equipment financings and interest income on invested cash balances. From inception through September 30, 2005, we have raised approximately $273.9 million in net proceeds from sales of equity securities.
     At September 30, 2005, we had $15.7 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, as compared to $23.1 million at December 31, 2004. Our working capital at September 30, 2005 was $13.1 million, as compared to $17.5 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments resulted from the use of our financial resources to fund our clinical and manufacturing activities, research and development efforts and for other general corporate purposes, partially offset by the net proceeds of $15.8 million we received from the sale of 12,250,000 shares of our common stock in February 2005. We invest our cash in United States government-backed securities, money market funds and debt instruments of financial institutions and corporations with strong credit ratings. As of September 30, 2005, we classified all of our investments as available-for-sale securities because we expect to sell them in order to support our current operations regardless of their maturity dates. As of September 30, 2005, available-for-sale securities and cash equivalents of $1.6 million have stated maturity dates of one year or less and $13.0 million have maturity dates after one year. See “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” below.
     As of September 30, 2005, we had acquired an aggregate of $15.0 million in property and equipment, of which approximately $3.5 million of equipment is financed under notes payable obligations. In addition, we lease our office and laboratory facilities and certain equipment under operating leases. In 2003, we entered into a $1.4 million purchase commitment with a potential third party manufacturer of materials for Riquent. The purpose of the agreement was to qualify the manufacturer as a manufacturer that we could use in the commercial production of Riquent if we obtained regulatory approval. As a result of our announcement that, based on the outcome of a meeting with the FDA, Riquent is unlikely to receive accelerated approval under the FDA’s Subpart H regulation, we believe that we have adequate capacity to meet our near term manufacturing requirements and that the third party manufacturing

10


Table of Contents

capacity is not currently required. Accordingly, the table below only includes the purchase commitment cancellation fee of $0.4 million. We have also entered into non-cancelable purchase commitments for an aggregate of $0.1 million with third-party manufacturers of materials to be used in the production of Riquent for our ongoing clinical benefit trial and for other purposes. We intend to use our current financial resources to fund our obligations under these purchase commitments. In the future, we may increase our investments in property and equipment if we obtain additional funding and expand our research and development and manufacturing facilities and capabilities.
     The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 2005. Long-term debt obligations include interest.
                                         
            Payment due by period (in thousands)  
            Less than                     More than  
    Total     1 Year     1-3 Years     3-5 Years     5 Years  
Long-Term Debt Obligations
  $ 927     $ 690     $ 237     $     $  
Operating Lease Obligations
    3,146       786       2,360              
Purchase Obligations
    539       539                    
 
                             
Total
  $ 4,612     $ 2,015     $ 2,597     $     $  
 
                             
     We intend to use our current limited financial resources to fund our current clinical trial of Riquent at its current enrollment level, limited manufacturing and research and development activities, and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. If we successfully complete the recently announced financing, we expect to expand our Riquent development activities, including restarting patient enrollment in the United States early in 2006 after a final review of the revised protocol by the FDA, expanding the study to Europe and Asia, submitting the MAA for Europe in the first half of 2006, and obtaining data on the ability of higher doses of Riquent to reduce further the levels of antibodies to dsDNA around the end of next year. We may also expend resources on possible future clinical trials. The amounts that we actually spend for each purpose may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including the timing of any regulatory applications and approvals, the outcome of our meetings with regulatory authorities, the continued analysis of the clinical trial data of Riquent, results from current and future clinical trials, and technological developments. Expenditures also will depend on any establishment of collaborative arrangements and contract research as well as the availability of other funding or financings. If our cash requirements exceed our current projections, we may need additional financing sooner than currently expected. There can be no assurance that future funds will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. In the future, it is possible that we will not have adequate resources to support continuation of our business activities.
     In March 2005, we implemented a restructuring plan that included a reduction in our workforce of 60 employees and the cessation of enrollment and site expansion for our ongoing clinical benefit trial of Riquent. We anticipate that our existing cash, cash investments, and interest earned thereon, will be sufficient to fund our operations as currently planned into the first quarter of 2006. This projection is based on the assumption that we do not raise any additional funds, either through the sale of additional securities or a collaborative agreement with a corporate partner, that we do not engage in any significant commercialization activities, and that we entirely exhaust our cash resources. If we do not secure additional funds in the near future, we may sell or license our assets, merge with another entity, elect to take one or more significant cost reducing measures, including significantly reducing our workforce, halting the ongoing clinical benefit trial of Riquent, reducing the expenses associated with our small molecule development program, or seek protection under relevant bankruptcy laws.
     On October 6, 2005, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement that provides for the sale of 88 million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 22 million shares of common stock to selected institutional and other accredited investors for gross proceeds of approximately $66 million. The sale of securities is expected to close in December 2005, and is subject to stockholder approval, remaining listed on either the Nasdaq National Market or the Nasdaq Capital Market, and other customary closing conditions.
     We have no current means of generating cash flow from operations. Our lead drug candidate, Riquent, will not generate revenues, if at all, until it has received regulatory approval and has been successfully manufactured, marketed and sold. This process, if completed, could take a significant

11


Table of Contents

amount of time. Our other drug candidates are much less developed than Riquent. There can be no assurance that our product development efforts with respect to Riquent or any other drug candidate will be successfully completed, that required regulatory approvals will be obtained or that any product, if introduced, will be successfully marketed or achieve commercial acceptance. Accordingly, we must continue to rely on outside sources of financing to meet our capital needs for the foreseeable future.
     We will continue to seek capital through any number of means, including by issuing our equity securities and by establishing one or more collaborative arrangements. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all, and our negotiating position in capital-raising efforts will likely worsen as we continue to use existing resources or if the development of Riquent is further delayed or terminated. If we obtain additional funding through sales of securities, your investment in us will be diluted, and dilution can be particularly substantial when the price of our common stock is low. There is also no assurance that we will be able to enter into a collaborative agreement.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     We invest our excess cash in interest-bearing investment-grade securities which we sell from time to time to support our current operations. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments, derivative commodity instruments or other market risk sensitive instruments, positions or transactions in any material fashion. Although the investment-grade securities that we hold are subject to changes in the financial standing of the issuer of such securities, we do not believe that we are subject to any material risks arising from the maturity dates of the debt instruments or changes in interest rates because the interest rates of the securities in which we invest that have a maturity date greater than one year are reset periodically within time periods not exceeding 49 days. We currently do not invest in any securities that are materially and directly affected by foreign currency exchange rates or commodity prices.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
     Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2005. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2005. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

12


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
3.1
  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (1)
 
   
3.2
  Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (28)
 
   
3.3
  Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (2)
 
   
4.1
  Rights Agreement dated as of December 3, 1998 between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (3)
 
   
4.2
  Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company (4)
 
   
4.3
  Amendment to Rights Agreement, effective as of July 21, 2000, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (5)
 
   
4.4
  Registration Rights Agreement by and among, among others, the Company, Essex Woodlands Health Ventures Fund VI, LP, Frazier Healthcare Ventures, Alejandro Gonzalez, Special Situations Funds, Domain Public Equity Partners, LP, and Sutter Hill Ventures, dated October 6, 2005 (29)
 
   
4.5
  Form of Contingent Warrants issued on October 6, 2005 (29)
 
   
10.1
  Steven B. Engle Employment Agreement (6)*
 
   
10.2
  Amendment No. 1 to Steven B. Engle Employment Agreement (7)*
 
   
10.3
  Amendment No. 2 to Steven B. Engle Employment Agreement (12)*
 
   
10.4
  Amendment No. 3 to Steven B. Engle Employment Agreement (17)*
 
   
10.5
  Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement*
 
   
10.6
  Industrial Real Estate Lease effective July 27, 1992, by and between the Company and BRE Properties, Inc. (6)
 
   
10.7
  First Amendment to Lease dated March 15, 1993 by and between the Company and BRE Properties, Inc. (6)
 
   
10.8
  La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of May 16, 2003) (17)*
 
   
10.9
  La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated as of May 19, 2005) (28)*
 
   
10.10
  Second Amendment to Lease, dated July 18, 1994, by and between the Company and BRE Properties, Inc. (9)
 
   
10.11
  Third Amendment to Lease, dated January 26, 1995, by and between the Company and BRE Properties, Inc. (10)
 
   
10.12
  Building Lease Agreement, effective November 1, 1996, by and between the Company and WCB II-S BRD Limited Partnership (11)
 
   
10.13
  Supplement to employment offer letter for Matthew Linnik, Ph.D. (12)*
 
   
10.14
  Supplement to employment offer letter for Theodora Reilly (13)*
 
   
10.15
  Supplement to employment offer letter for Paul Jenn, Ph.D. (13)*
 
   
10.16
  Supplement to employment offer letter for Bruce K. Bennett, Jr. (14)*
 
   
10.17
  Supplement to employment offer letter for Kenneth R. Heilbrunn (8)*
 
   
10.18
  Supplement to employment offer letter for Josefina Elchico (25)*
 
   
10.19
  Master Security Agreement, effective September 6, 2002, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (15)
 
   
10.20
  Promissory Note, dated as of September 26, 2002, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (15)

13


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
10.21
  Amendment to Promissory Note, effective as of September 27, 2002, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (15)
 
   
10.22
  Promissory Note, dated as of December 30, 2002, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (16)
 
   
10.23
  Promissory Note, dated as of April 23, 2003, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (16)
 
   
10.24
  Promissory Note, dated as of June 27, 2003, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (17)
 
   
10.25
  Promissory Note, dated as of September 26, 2003, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (18)
 
   
10.26
  Promissory Note, dated as of December 18, 2003, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (22)
 
   
10.27
  Underwriting Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2003, between the Company and Pacific Growth Equities, LLC (19)
 
   
10.28
  Underwriting Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2004, between the Company and Pacific Growth Equities, LLC (21)
 
   
10.29
  Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 2002, between the Company and the initial purchasers (20)
 
   
10.30
  Form of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated January 2002, between the Company and the initial purchasers (20)
 
   
10.31
  Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 5, 2001, between the Company and the initial purchasers (18)
 
   
10.32
  Form of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 5, 2001, between the Company and the initial purchasers (18)
 
   
10.33
  Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 19, 2000, between the Company and the initial purchasers (18)
 
   
10.34
  Form of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 19, 2000, between the Company and the initial purchasers (18)
 
   
10.35
  Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 10, 2000, between the Company and the initial purchasers (18)
 
   
10.36
  Form of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 10, 2000, between the Company and the initial purchasers (18)
 
   
10.37
  Supplement to employment offer letter for Gail A. Sloan (23)*
 
   
10.38
  Promissory Note, dated as March 31, 2004, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (23)
 
   
10.39
  Promissory Note, dated as June 25, 2004, between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (24)
 
   
10.40
  Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated July 8, 2004, by and between the Company and EOP-Industrial Portfolio, LLC (24)
 
   
10.41
  First Amendment to Lease, dated May 4, 2001, by and between the Company and Spieker Properties, L.P. (24)
 
   
10.42
  Second Amendment to Lease, dated July 8, 2004, by and between the Company and EOP-Industrial Portfolio, LLC (24)
 
   
10.43
  La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of May 19, 2005) (28)*
 
   
10.44
  Form of option grant under the La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (27)*
 
   
10.45
  Promissory Note, dated as of September 28, 2004, by and between the Company and General Electric Capital Corporation (25)

14


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
10.46
  Underwriting Agreement, dated January 28, 2005, by and between the Company and Pacific Growth Equities, LLC (26)
 
   
10.47
  Securities Purchase Agreement by and among, among others, the Company, Essex Woodlands Health Ventures Fund VI, LP, Frazier Healthcare Ventures, Alejandro Gonzalez, Special Situations Funds, Domain Public Equity Partners, LP, and Sutter Hill Ventures, dated October 6, 2005 (29)
 
   
10.48
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Steven B. Engle, dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
10.49
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Matthew D. Linnik, Ph.D., dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
10.50
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Bruce K. Bennett, dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
10.51
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Josefina T. Elchico, dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
10.52
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Paul C. Jenn, Ph.D., dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
10.53
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Theodora Reilly, dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
10.54
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Gail A. Sloan, dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
10.55
  Retention Agreement, by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and Andrew Wiseman, Ph.D., dated October 6, 2005 (29)*
 
   
31.1
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
31.2
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
32.1
  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
*   This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
 
(1)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(2)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(3)   Previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A (No. 000-24274) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 4, 1998.
 
(4)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(5)   Previously filed with the Company’s report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2001 and incorporated by reference herein. The changes effected by the Amendment are also reflected in the Amendment to Application for Registration on Form 8-A/A filed on January 26, 2001.
 
(6)   Previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-76480) as declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 3, 1994.
 
(7)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(8)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(9)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1994 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(10)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1995 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(11)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 and incorporated by reference herein.

15


Table of Contents

(12)   Previously filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(13)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(14)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(15)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(16)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(17)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(18)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(19)   Previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(20)   Previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2002 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(21)   Previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 20, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(22)   Previously filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(23)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(24)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(25)   Previously filed with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(26)   Previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(27)   Previously filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(28)   Previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
(29)   Previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein.

16


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     
 
  La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company
 
   
Date: November 4, 2005
  /s/ Steven B. Engle
 
   
 
  Steven B. Engle
 
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
  (On behalf of the Registrant)
 
   
 
  /s/ Gail A. Sloan
 
   
 
  Gail A. Sloan
 
  Vice President of Finance and Secretary
 
  (As Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

17


Table of Contents

LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
10.5
  Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement*
 
   
31.1
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
31.2
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
32.1
  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

Exhibit 10.5
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
     This Indemnification Agreement (this “ Agreement ”) is made as of this                      day of                      , 2005 by and between La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company (the “ Company ”) and                                           (“ Indemnitee ”).
RECITALS
     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that in order to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers of the Company, it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to indemnify such persons for claims and actions against them arising out of their service to and activities on behalf of the Company;
     WHEREAS, the bylaws of the Company provide for indemnification of its officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, and the Company wishes to clarify and enhance the rights and obligations of the Company and Indemnitee with respect to indemnification;
     WHEREAS, the Company has elected to follow the corporate governance practices and procedures of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “ DGCL ”), as the same may be amended from time to time;
     WHEREAS, in order to induce and encourage experienced and capable persons such as Indemnitee to serve and continue to serve as directors and officers of the Company and in any other capacity with respect to the Company, and to otherwise promote the desirable end that such persons will resist what they consider unjustified lawsuits and claims made against them in connection with the good faith performance of their duties to the Company, with the knowledge that certain costs, judgments, penalties, fines, liabilities and expenses incurred by them in their defense of such litigation will be borne by the Company and that they will receive the maximum protection against such risks and liabilities as may be afforded by applicable law, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that this Agreement is reasonable, prudent and necessary to promote and ensure the best interests of the Company and its stockholders; and
     WHEREAS, the Company desires to have Indemnitee continue to serve as a director or officer of the Company free from undue concern for unpredictable, inappropriate or unreasonable legal risks and personal liabilities by reason of Indemnitee acting in good faith in the performance of Indemnitee’s duties to the Company; and Indemnitee desires to continue to serve the Company.
     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Indemnitee’s continued service as a director or officer of the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
     1.  Indemnity of Indemnitee . The Company hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL and the bylaws of the Company, as each may be amended from time to time. In furtherance of the foregoing indemnification, and without limiting the generality thereof:
          (a)  Third party proceedings . Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section 1(a) if, by reason of his Corporate Status ( as defined in Section 15 ), he is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant in any Proceeding ( as defined in Section 15 ) other than a Proceeding by or in the right of the Company. Pursuant to this Section 1(a) , and to the

 


 

extent allowed by applicable law, Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses ( as defined in Section 15 ), judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with such Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company and, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.
          (b)  Proceedings by or in the right of the Company . Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section 1(b) if, by reason of his Corporate Status, he is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant in any Proceeding brought by or in the right of the Company to procure a judgment in its favor. Pursuant to this Section 1(b) , Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with such Proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company; provided, however, that, if applicable law so provides, no indemnification against such Expenses shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter in such Proceeding as to which Indemnitee shall have been adjudged to be liable to the Company unless, and only to the extent, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or the court in which such Proceeding shall have been brought or is pending, shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, Indemnitee is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such costs, judgments, penalties, fines, liabilities and Expenses as such court shall deem proper.
          (c)  Indemnification for expenses of a party who is wholly or partly successful . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee is, by reason of his Corporate Status, a party to a Proceeding and is successful, on the merits or otherwise, in any such Proceeding, he shall be indemnified to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection therewith. If Indemnitee is not wholly successful in such proceeding but is successful, on the merits or otherwise, as to one or more but less than all claims, issues or matters in such Proceeding, the Company shall indemnify Indemnitee against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with each successfully resolved claim, issue or matter. For purposes of this Section and without limitation, the termination of any claim, issue or matter in such a Proceeding by dismissal with or without prejudice, shall be deemed to be a successful result as to such claim, issue or matter.
          (d)  Additional Indemnity . Notwithstanding any limitation in Section 1(a), (b) or (c) , the Company shall indemnify Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law if Indemnitee is a party to or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding (including a Proceeding by or on behalf of the Company to procure a judgment in its favor) against all Expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee in connection with the Proceeding; provided that , indemnification of Indemnitee shall be made by the Company only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that the indemnification of Indemnitee is proper under the circumstances because Indemnitee met the applicable standard of conduct. For purposes of this Section 1(d) , the meaning of the phrase “to the fullest extent permitted by law” shall include, but not be limited to:
               (i) to the fullest extent permitted by the provisions of the DGCL that authorize or contemplate additional indemnification by agreement (or the corresponding provision of any amendment to or successor or substitute provision of the DGCL); and
               (ii) to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by any amendment to the DGCL or by any successor or substitute rule, law or provision adopted after the date of this Agreement that increase the extent to which a corporation may indemnify it officers and directors.

2


 

     2.  Exclusions . Notwithstanding any provision of Section 1 to the contrary, no indemnity shall be paid by the Company:
          (a) with respect to remuneration paid to Indemnitee if it shall be determined by a final judgment or other final adjudication that such remuneration was in violation of law;
          (b) on account of any suit in which judgment is rendered against Indemnitee for an accounting of profits made from the purchase or sale by Indemnitee of securities of the Company pursuant to the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or similar provisions of any federal, state or local statutory law;
          (c) on account of Indemnitee’s conduct which is finally adjudged to have been knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest, or to constitute willful misconduct; or
          (d) if a final decision by a court having jurisdiction in the matter shall determine that such indemnification is not lawful.
     3.  Contribution . If the indemnification provided in Section 1 is unavailable and may not be paid to Indemnitee for any reason (other than those set forth in Section 2(a), (b) and (c) ), then with respect to any Proceeding in which the Company is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such Proceeding), the Company shall contribute to the amount of Expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred and paid or payable by Indemnitee to the extent allowed by applicable law, in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect (i) the relative benefits received by the Company on the one hand and by the Indemnitee on the other hand from the transaction from which such Proceeding arose and (ii) the relative fault of the Company on the one hand and of the Indemnitee on the other hand in connection with the events which resulted in such Expenses, judgments, fines or settlement amounts, as well as any other relevant equitable considerations. The relative fault of the Company on the one hand and of the Indemnitee on the other hand shall be determined by reference to, among other things, the parties’ relative intent, knowledge, access to information and opportunity to correct or prevent the circumstances resulting in such Expenses, judgments, fines or settlement amounts. The Company agrees that it would not be just and equitable if contribution pursuant to this Section 3 were determined by pro rata allocation or any other method of allocation which does not take account of the foregoing equitable considerations.
     4.  Indemnification for Expenses of a Witness . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee is, by reason of his Corporate Status, a witness in any Proceeding to which Indemnitee is not a party, he shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection therewith.
     5.  Advancement of Expenses . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent allowed by applicable law, the Company shall advance all reasonable Expenses incurred by or on behalf of Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding by reason of Indemnitee’s Corporate Status within twenty (20) days after the receipt by the Company of a statement or statements from Indemnitee requesting such advance or advances from time to time, whether prior to or after final disposition of such Proceeding. Such statement or statements (i) shall reasonably evidence the Expenses incurred by Indemnitee, (ii) shall include or be accompanied by such documentation and information as is reasonably requested by the Company to determine the nature of the Proceeding and whether Indemnitee is entitled to the advancement of Expenses, and (iii) shall include or be preceded by an undertaking by or on behalf of Indemnitee to repay any Expenses advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified against such Expenses. Any advances and undertakings to repay pursuant to this Section 5 shall be unsecured and interest free. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the obligation of the Company to advance Expenses pursuant to this Section 5 shall be subject to the condition that, if, when

3


 

and to the extent that the Company determines that Indemnitee would not be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law, the Company shall be entitled to be reimbursed, within sixty (60) days of such determination, by Indemnitee (who hereby agrees to reimburse the Company) for all such amounts theretofore paid; provided, however , that if Indemnitee has commenced or thereafter commences legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to secure a determination that Indemnitee should be indemnified under applicable law, any determination made by the Company that Indemnitee would not be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law shall not be binding and Indemnitee shall not be required to reimburse the Company for any advance of Expenses until a final judicial determination is made with respect thereto (as to which all rights of appeal therefrom have been exhausted or lapsed).
     6.  Procedure for Determination of Entitlement to Indemnification .
          (a) To obtain indemnification under this Agreement, Indemnitee shall submit to the Company a written request, including therein or therewith such documentation and information as is reasonably available to Indemnitee and is reasonably necessary to determine whether and to what extent Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification. The Chief Executive Officer of the Company shall, promptly upon receipt of such a request for indemnification, advise the Board of Directors in writing that Indemnitee has requested indemnification; provided that , if the Chief Executive Officer is making such request, then the notice to the Board of Directors shall be given by the Secretary of the Company.
          (b) Upon written request by Indemnitee for indemnification, a determination with respect to Indemnitee’s entitlement thereto shall be made by the following person or persons who shall be empowered to make such determination: (i) the Board of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum of Disinterested Directors ( as defined in Section 15 ); (ii) by Independent Counsel ( as defined in Section 15 ) in a written opinion to the Board of Directors (a copy of which shall be delivered to Indemnitee) if a quorum of the Board of Directors consisting of Disinterested Directors is not obtainable or, even if obtainable, said Disinterested Directors so direct; or (iii) if so directed by said Disinterested Directors, by the stockholders of the Company. If it is determined that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, payment to Indemnitee shall be made within fifteen (15) days after such determination. Indemnitee shall cooperate with the person, persons or entity making such determination with respect to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification, including providing to such person, persons or entity upon reasonable advance request any documentation or information which is not privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and which is reasonably available to Indemnitee and reasonably necessary to such determination. Any Independent Counsel, member of the Board of Directors, or stockholder of the Company shall act reasonably and in good faith in making a determination under this Agreement of the Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification. Any Expenses incurred by Indemnitee in so cooperating with the person, persons or entity making such determination shall be borne by the Company to the extent allowed by applicable law (irrespective of the determination as to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification) and the Company hereby indemnifies and agrees to hold Indemnitee harmless therefrom.
          (c) If the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by Independent Counsel pursuant to Section 6(b) hereof, the Independent Counsel shall be selected as provided in this Section 6(c) . The Independent Counsel shall be selected by the Board of Directors (subject to this Section 6(c) ), and the Company shall give written notice to Indemnitee advising him of the identity of the Independent Counsel so selected. Indemnitee may, within seven (7) days after receipt of such written notice of selection, deliver to the Company a written objection to such selection; provided, however, such objection may be asserted only on the ground that the Independent Counsel so selected does not meet the requirements of “Independent Counsel,” as defined in Section 15 of this Agreement, and the objection shall set forth with particularity the factual basis of such assertion. Absent a proper and timely objection, the person so selected shall act as Independent Counsel. If a written objection is made and substantiated, the Independent Counsel selected may not serve as Independent Counsel unless and until such objection is withdrawn or a court has determined that such objection is without merit. If,

4


 

within twenty (20) days after submission by Indemnitee of a written request for indemnification pursuant to Section 6(a) hereof, (i) an Independent Counsel has not been selected or (ii) an Independent Counsel has been selected, but there is an outstanding written objection regarding the independence of the Independent Counsel selected by the Company, either the Indemnitee or the Company may petition a court of competent jurisdiction for resolution of any objection which shall have been made by Indemnitee to the Company’s selection of Independent Counsel and/or for the appointment as Independent Counsel of a person selected by the court or by such other person as the court shall designate, and the person with respect to whom all objections are so resolved or the person so appointed shall act as Independent Counsel under Section 6(b) hereof. The Company shall pay any and all reasonable fees and expenses of Independent Counsel incurred by such Independent Counsel in connection with acting pursuant to Section 6(b) hereof, and the Company shall pay all reasonable fees and expenses incident to the procedures of this Section 6(c) , regardless of the manner in which such Independent Counsel was selected or appointed. Upon the due commencement of any judicial proceeding or arbitration pursuant to Section 8(a) of this Agreement, Independent Counsel shall be discharged and relieved of any further responsibility in such capacity (subject to the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing).
     7.  Presumptions and Effect of Certain Proceedings.
          (a) In making a determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification hereunder, the person or persons or entity making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement if Indemnitee has submitted a request for indemnification in accordance with Section 6(a) of this Agreement and the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption in connection with the making by any person, persons or entity of any determination contrary to that presumption.
          (b) If the person, persons or entity empowered or selected under Section 6 of this Agreement to determine whether Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification shall not have made a determination within sixty (60) days after receipt by the Company of the request therefor, the requisite determination of entitlement to indemnification shall be deemed to have been made and Indemnitee shall be entitled to such indemnification (i) absent actual and material fraud in the request for indemnification or (ii) a prohibition of such indemnification under applicable law; provided, however , that such 60-day period may be extended for a reasonable time, not to exceed an additional thirty (30) days, if the person, persons or entity making the determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification in good faith requires such additional time for the obtaining or evaluating documentation and/or information relating thereto; and provided, further , that the foregoing provisions of this Section 7(b) shall not apply (i)(A) if the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by the stockholders pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement and (B)(1) if, within fifteen (15) days after receipt by the Company of the request for such determination, the Board of Directors or the Disinterested Directors, if appropriate, resolve to submit such determination to the stockholders for their consideration at an annual meeting thereof to be held within seventy five (75) days after such receipt and such determination is made thereat or (2) a special meeting of stockholders is called within thirty (30) days after such receipt for the purpose of making such determination, such meeting is held for such purpose within sixty (60) days after having been so called and such determination is made thereat or (ii) if the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by Independent Counsel pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement.
          (c) The termination of any Proceeding or of any claim, issue or matter therein, by judgment, order, settlement (with or without court approval), conviction, or upon a plea of no lo contendere or its equivalent, shall not (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement) of itself adversely affect the right of Indemnitee to indemnification or create a presumption that Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company or, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, that Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

5


 

          (d) For purposes of any determination of good faith, Indemnitee shall be deemed to have acted in good faith if Indemnitee’s action is based on the records or books of account of the Enterprise ( as defined in Section 15 ), including financial statements, or on information supplied to Indemnitee by the directors, officers or key employees of the Enterprise in the course of their duties, or on the advice of legal counsel for the Enterprise or on information or records given or reports made to the Enterprise by an independent certified public accountant or by an appraiser or other expert selected with reasonable care by the Enterprise. In addition, the knowledge and/or actions, or failure to act, of any director, officer, agent or employee of the Enterprise shall not be imputed to Indemnitee for purposes of determining the right to indemnification under this Agreement. The provisions of this Section 7(d) shall not be deemed to be exclusive or to limit in any way the other circumstances in which the Indemnitee may be deemed to have met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in this Agreement.
     8.  Remedies of Indemnitee .
          (a) In the event that (i) payment of contribution or indemnification is not made pursuant to Section 3 or Section 4 of this Agreement, respectively, within fifteen (15) days after receipt by the Company of a written request therefor, (ii) advancement of Expenses is not timely made pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement, (iii) a determination of entitlement to indemnification shall not have been made pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement within the time frames described in Section 7(b) , (iv) a determination is made pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, or (v) payment of indemnification is not made within fifteen (15) days after a determination has been made that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification or such determination is deemed to have been made pursuant to Section 6 or Section 7 of this Agreement, respectively, Indemnitee shall be entitled to an adjudication in an appropriate court of the State of Delaware, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, of his entitlement to such indemnification. Alternatively, Indemnitee, at his option, may seek an award in arbitration to be conducted by a single arbitrator pursuant to the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Indemnitee shall commence such proceeding seeking an adjudication or an award in arbitration within 180 days following the date on which Indemnitee first has the right to commence such proceeding pursuant to this Section 8(a) . The Company shall not oppose Indemnitee’s right to seek any such adjudication or award in arbitration.
          (b) In the event that a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification, any judicial proceeding or arbitration commenced pursuant to this Section 8 shall be conducted in all respects as a de novo trial, or arbitration, on the merits and Indemnitee shall not be prejudiced by reason of that adverse determination.
          (c) If a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, the Company shall be bound by such determination in any judicial proceeding or arbitration commenced pursuant to this Section 8 , absent (i) a misstatement by Indemnitee of a material fact, or an omission of a material fact necessary to make Indemnitee’s statement not materially misleading, in connection with the request for indemnification, or (ii) a prohibition of such indemnification under applicable law.
          (d) In the event that Indemnitee, pursuant to this Section 8 , seeks a judicial adjudication of or an award in arbitration to enforce his rights under, or to recover damages for breach of, this Agreement, Indemnitee shall be entitled to recover from the Company, and shall be indemnified by the Company against, any and all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him in such judicial adjudication or arbitration, but only if he prevails therein. If it shall be determined in said judicial adjudication or arbitration that Indemnitee is entitled to receive part but not all of the indemnification sought, the expenses incurred by Indemnitee in connection with such judicial adjudication or arbitration shall be appropriately prorated. The Company shall indemnify Indemnitee against any and all expenses

6


 

and, if requested by Indemnitee, shall (within ten (10) days after receipt by the Company of a written request therefor) advance such expenses to Indemnitee, which are incurred by Indemnitee in connection with any action brought by Indemnitee to recover under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies maintained by the Company, regardless of whether Indemnitee ultimately is determined to be entitled to such indemnification, advancement of expenses or insurance recovery, as the case may be.
          (e) The Company shall be precluded from asserting in any judicial proceeding or arbitration commenced pursuant to this Section 8 that the procedures and presumptions of this Agreement are not valid, binding and enforceable and shall stipulate in any such court or before any such arbitrator that the Company is bound by all the provisions of this Agreement.
     9.  Non-Exclusivity; Survival of Rights; Insurance; Subrogation .
          (a) The rights of indemnification as provided by this Agreement shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which Indemnitee may at any time be entitled under applicable law, the bylaws or certificate of incorporation of the Company, any agreement, a vote of stockholders or a resolution of directors, or otherwise. No amendment, alteration or repeal of this Agreement or of any provision hereof shall limit or restrict any right of Indemnitee under this Agreement in respect of any action taken or omitted by such Indemnitee in his Corporate Status prior to such amendment, alteration or repeal. To the extent that a change in applicable law, whether by statute or judicial decision, permits greater indemnification than would be afforded currently under the Company’s bylaws and this Agreement, it is the intent of the parties hereto that Indemnitee shall enjoy by this Agreement the greater benefits so afforded by such change. No right or remedy herein conferred is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy, and every other right and remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every other right and remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or otherwise. The assertion or employment of any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise, shall not prevent the concurrent assertion or employment of any other right or remedy.
          (b) To the extent that the Company maintains an insurance policy or policies providing liability insurance for directors, officers, employees, or agents or fiduciaries of the Company or of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise which such person serves at the request of the Company, Indemnitee shall be covered by such policy or policies in accordance with its or their terms to the maximum extent of the coverage available for any such director, officer, employee or agent under such policy or policies.
          (c) In the event of any payment under this Agreement, the Company shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of Indemnitee, who shall execute all papers required and take all action necessary to secure such rights, including execution of such documents as are necessary to enable the Company to bring suit to enforce such rights.
          (d) The Company shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment of amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder if and to the extent that Indemnitee has otherwise actually received such payment under any insurance policy, contract, agreement or otherwise.
     10. Exception to Right of Indemnification . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Indemnitee shall not be entitled to indemnification under this Agreement with respect to any Proceeding or claim therein brought voluntarily by Indemnitee and not by way of defense, unless (a) the bringing of such Proceeding or making of such claim shall have been approved by the Board of Directors or (b) such Proceeding is being brought by the Indemnitee to assert his rights under this Agreement.

7


 

     11.  Notification and Defense of Claim . Indemnitee agrees promptly to notify the Company in writing upon being served with any summons, citation, subpoena, complaints, indictment, information or other document relating to any Proceeding or matter which may be subject to indemnification covered hereunder. The failure to so notify the Company shall not relieve the Company of any obligation which it may have to the Indemnitee under this Agreement or otherwise. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, with respect to any such Proceeding of which Indemnitee notifies the Company:
          (a) The Company will be entitled to participate therein at its own expense;
          (b) Except as otherwise provided in this Section 11(b) , to the extent that it may wish, the Company, together with any other indemnifying party similarly notified, shall be entitled to assume the defense thereof, with counsel reasonably satisfactory to Indemnitee. After notice from the Company to Indemnitee of its election so to assume the defense thereof, the Company shall not be liable to Indemnitee under this Agreement for any Expenses subsequently incurred by Indemnitee in connection with the defense thereof except as otherwise provided below. Indemnitee shall have the right to employ Indemnitee’s own counsel in such Proceeding, but the fees and expenses of such counsel incurred after notice from the Company of its assumption of the defense thereof shall be at the expense of Indemnitee unless (i) the employment of counsel by Indemnitee has been authorized by the Company, (ii) Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between the Company and Indemnitee in the conduct of the defense of such action or (iii) the Company shall not in fact have employed counsel to assume the defense of the action, in each of which cases the fees and expenses of Indemnitee’s counsel shall be at the expense of the Company. The Company shall not be entitled to assume the defense of any Proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Company or as to which Indemnitee shall have made the conclusion provided for in (ii) above; and
          (c) The Company shall not be liable to indemnify Indemnitee under this Agreement for any amounts paid in settlement of any Proceeding effected without the Company’s written consent. The Company shall not settle any Proceeding in any manner that would impose any penalty or limitation on or disclosure obligation with respect to Indemnitee without Indemnitee’s written consent. Neither the Company nor Indemnitee will unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed settlement.
     12.  Duration of Agreement . All agreements and obligations of the Company contained herein shall continue during the period Indemnitee is an officer or director of the Company (or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise) and shall continue thereafter so long as Indemnitee shall be subject to any Proceeding (or any proceeding commenced under Section 8 hereof) by reason of his Corporate Status, whether or not he is acting or serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification can be provided under this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective successors (including any direct or indirect successor by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise to all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company), assigns, spouses, heirs, executors and personal and legal representatives. This Agreement shall continue in effect regardless of whether Indemnitee continues to serve as an officer or director of the Company or any other Enterprise at the Company’s request.
     13.  Security . To the extent requested by the Indemnitee and approved by the Board of Directors, the Company may at any time and from time to time provide security to the Indemnitee for the Company’s obligations hereunder through an irrevocable blank line of credit, funded trust or other collateral. Any such security, once provided to the Indemnitee, may not be revoked or released without the prior written consent of the Indemnitee.

8


 

     14.  Enforcement .
          (a) The Company expressly confirms and agrees that it has entered into this Agreement and assumed the obligations imposed on it hereby in order to induce Indemnitee to serve as an officer or director of the Company, and the Company acknowledges that Indemnitee is relying upon this Agreement in serving as an officer or director of the Company.
          (b) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, oral written and implied, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.
     15.  Definitions . For purposes of this Agreement:
          (a) “ Corporate Status ” describes the status of a person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent or fiduciary of the Company or of any other corporation, partnership joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other Enterprise which such person is or was serving at the express written request of the Company.
          (b) “ Disinterested Director ” means a director of the Company who is not and was not a party to the Proceeding with respect to which indemnification is sought by Indemnitee.
          (c) “ Enterprise ” shall mean the Company and any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise of which Indemnitee is or was serving at the express written request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary.
          (d) “ Expenses ” shall include all reasonable attorneys’ fees, retainers, court costs, transcript costs, fees of experts, witness fees, travel expenses, duplicating costs, printing and binding costs, telephone charges, postage, delivery service fees, and all other disbursements or expenses of the types customarily incurred in connection with prosecuting, defending, preparing to prosecute or defend, investigating, participating, or being or preparing to be a witness in, or otherwise participating in a Proceeding.
          (e) “ Independent Counsel ” means a law firm, or a member of a law firm, that is experienced in matters of corporation law and neither presently is, nor in the past five years has been, retained to represent: (i) the Company or Indemnitee in any matter material to either such party (other than with respect to matters concerning the Indemnitee under this Agreement, or of other indemnitees under similar indemnification agreements) or (ii) any other party to the Proceeding giving rise to a claim for indemnification hereunder. The term “Independent Counsel” shall not include any person who, under the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing, would have a conflict of interest in representing either the Company or Indemnitee in an action to determine Indemnitee’s rights under this Agreement.
          (f) “ Proceeding ” includes any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, arbitration, alternate dispute resolution mechanism, investigation, inquiry, administrative hearing or any other actual, threatened or completed proceeding, whether brought by or in the right of the Company or otherwise and whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, in which Indemnitee was, is or will be involved as a party or otherwise, by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was a director, officer employee or agent of the Company, by reason of any action taken by him or of any inaction on his part while acting as a director, officer employee or agent of the Company, or by reason of the fact that he is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise; in each case whether or not he is acting or serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification can be provided under this Agreement; including one pending on or before the date of this Agreement; and excluding one initiated by an Indemnitee pursuant to Section 8 of this Agreement to enforce his rights under this Agreement.

9


 

     16.  Severability . If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, illegal or otherwise unenforceable for any reason whatsoever: (a) the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement (including without limitation, each portion of any section of this Agreement containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, that is not itself invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby and shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law; and (b) to the fullest extent possible, the provisions of this Agreement (including, without limitation, each portion of any section of this Agreement containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, that is not itself invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall be construed so as to give effect to the intent manifested thereby.
     17.  Modification and Waiver . No supplement, modification, termination or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both of the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions hereof (whether or not similar) nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
     18.  Notices . All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if (i) delivered by hand and receipted for by the party to whom said notice or other communication shall have been directed, or (ii) mailed by certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third business day after the date postmarked. Addresses for notice to either party are as provided below, or as subsequently modified by written notice
          (a) If to Indemnitee, to:
          (b) If to the Company, to:
La Jolla Pharmaceutical Corporation
Attention: Corporate Secretary
6455 Nancy Ridge Drive
San Diego, California 92121
          (c) With a copy to:
Mark W. Shurtleff, Esq.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700
Irvine, California 92614
     19.  Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Signatures transmitted electronically or by facsimile will be deemed original signatures.
     20.  Headings; References; Pronouns . The headings of the paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to affect the construction thereof. References herein to section numbers are to sections of this Agreement. All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine, neuter, singular or plural as appropriate.
     21.  Consent to Jurisdiction . The Company and Indemnitee each hereby irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Delaware for all purposes in connection with any action or proceeding which arises out of or relates to this Agreement and agree that any action instituted under this Agreement shall be brought only in the state courts of the State of Delaware.
     22.  Governing Law . The parties agree that this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware without application of the conflict of laws principles thereof.

10


 

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on and as of the day and year first above written.
                 
    LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
 
               
 
      By:        
             
            Steven B. Engle
            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
               
    INDEMNITEE
 
               
        Signature:    
 
               
 
               
        Print Name:    
 
               

 

EXHIBIT 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
I, Steven B. Engle, certify that:
  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company;
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     
Date: November 4, 2005
  /s/ Steven B. Engle
 
   
 
  Steven B. Engle
 
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

EXHIBIT 31.2
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
I, Gail A. Sloan, certify that:
  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company;
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     
Date: November 4, 2005
  /s/ Gail A. Sloan
 
   
 
  Gail A. Sloan
 
  Vice President of Finance and Secretary

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Each of the undersigned, in his or her capacity as an officer of La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results of operations of the Registrant of such quarter.
     
Dated: November 4, 2005
   
 
   
 
  /s/ Steven B. Engle
 
   
 
  Steven B. Engle
 
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
   
 
  /s/ Gail A. Sloan
 
   
 
  Gail A. Sloan
 
  Vice President of Finance and Secretary
Note:   Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and will be retained by La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.