|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 at a glance
|
|
|
Leadership and governance
|
Interview with our CEO
|
|
Board of Management
|
||
Highlights
|
|
Supervisory Board
|
||
|
|
|
Message from the Chair of our Supervisory Board
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do
|
|
Supervisory Board report
|
|
Our company
|
|
Remuneration report
|
||
Our products and services
|
|
Corporate governance
|
||
Our markets
|
|
|
|
|
Industry trends and opportunities
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
How we create value
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
||
Our strategy
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
||
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
What we achieved in 2019
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Materiality: assessing our impact
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
|
||
Technology and innovation ecosystem
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
||
Our people
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
||
Our supply chain
|
|
|
|
|
Our operations
|
|
|
Non-financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
Assurance Report of the Independent Auditor
|
|
|
CFO financial review
|
|
About the non-financial information
|
|
Financial performance
|
|
Non-financial indicators
|
||
Financing policy
|
|
Stakeholder engagement
|
||
Long-term growth opportunities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices
|
|
|
How we manage risk
|
|
Definitions
|
|
Business risk and continuity
|
|
Exhibit index
|
||
Risk factors
|
|
|
|
|
Business ethics and compliance
|
|
|
|
|
Tax policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'The 20-year EUV journey has really been a joint effort by
our stakeholders'
|
Peter Wennink, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
The TWINSCAN NXE:3400C is our latest-generation EUV lithography system, combining productivity, highest resolution, and state-of-the-art overlay and focus performance.
We’re developing the future generation of EUV lithography systems, using a higher numerical aperture, known as High-NA technology. The first R&D systems are planned to be shipped in early 2022 with volume production tools in 2024/2025. This technology will enable geometric chip scaling beyond the current decade, offering a resolution and overlay capability that is 70% better than our current EUV platform. |
TWINSCAN NXE:3400C
|
|
|
Our portfolio of dry systems offers tool types for all different wave-lengths. The TWINSCAN XT:1460K is our latest-generation dual-stage ArF dry lithography system. It offers excellent overlay and imaging performance at high productivity. The TWINSCAN XT:1060K is ASML’s most advanced KrF (krypton fluoride) laser lithography system offering best-in-class resolution and overlay, and has a higher NA to support the more critical KrF layers. The TWINSCAN XT:860M, our KrF lithography system for volume 200 mm and 300 mm wafer production at and below 110 nm resolution, supports high demand for 3D NAND applications. The TWINSCAN XT:400L is ASML’s latest-generation i-line lithography system, using a mercury vapor lamp to print features down to a 220 nm resolution, also for 200 and 300 mm wafer production.
|
TWINSCAN XT:1460K
|
|
|
Our YieldStar optical metrology solutions can quickly and accurately measure the quality of patterns on the wafer.
YieldStar 380G offers the latest in-resist overlay and focus metrology. It provides enhanced throughput compared to previous generations. One of the most important features of the new system is the move from single wavelength measurement to dual and multi-wavelength measurement. This significantly improves accuracy and robustness, without extra time.
YieldStar 1375 is the only optical tool in the market for fast, accurate overlay for in-device metrology. This is providing yield improvements, which is triggering customer adoption in their processes.
|
YieldStar 1375
|
|
•
|
3D integrated circuits enabling better performance, power, form factor and functionality
|
•
|
Geometric scaling to reduce cost
|
•
|
Domain-specific architecture driven by energy efficiency
|
•
|
Shareholder value: Our large and sustained investments in research and development to execute our business strategy keeps us as a leader in holistic lithography. Our innovations contribute to the long-term growth of the semiconductor industry which benefits our solid financial performance and capital return policy.
|
•
|
Customer value: As one of the world’s leading manufacturers of chipmaking equipment, we invest in innovations that enable the continued shrink of microchips. With EUV and the next generation of EUV, High-NA, we secure continuation of Moore’s Law. This allows our customers to develop ever-more powerful chips for new applications and devices. At the same time we help our customers to reduce their cost.
|
•
|
Supplier value: As we grow and our innovations enter ever-high level of complexity, we want our suppliers to grow with us. We innovate together with our supplier network, sharing knowledge and tapping into each other’s technology expertise. Long-term relations, close cooperation and transparency with our suppliers are key to our success.
|
•
|
Employee value: Our workforce has grown steeply in recent years. In the past 5 years, we have created more than 10,100 jobs in the communities where we operate. Every day our employees come together to unlock the potential of each nanometer to break new ground. We are a proud employer of 118 nationalities at ASML, allowing for diverse points of view in our quest to develop the best ideas and solutions. Developing our people is crucial to the sustained success of our business, therefore we invest in their career development.
|
•
|
Societal value: With our continuous innovations, we enable new technology that supports the growth and transformation of the semiconductor industry, using artificial intelligence to offer new applications and services to address society’s needs. Through our innovation ecosystem we nurture innovation by giving back to society, such as sharing our expertise with universities and research institutes, supporting young tech companies, and promoting STEM education worldwide.
|
1.
|
Identification of relevant aspects
|
2.
|
Analysis and prioritization
|
3.
|
Implementation: strategy and report structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materiality
|
Area
|
Value chain impact
|
|
SDGs
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Supply chain
|
ASML operations
|
Product use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and innovation ecosystem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Technology
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innovation ecosystem
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product safety
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer intimacy
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
People
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair remuneration
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor relations
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee safety
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community involvement
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our supply chain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Supply chain
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responsible supply chain
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Circular economy
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Climate and energy
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water management
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational excellence
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Financial performance
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How we manage risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Business risk and continuity
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business ethics and compliance
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human rights
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax policy
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharing knowledge at ASML’s Technology Conference
Nowhere is the power of our R&D capability more evident than at our annual ASML Technology Conference. One of the largest of its kind in the world, it brings together internal technology experts and representatives from our global customer base. We held our 20th edition of the conference and our biggest ever in 2019, with around 6,000 participants attending simultaneous sessions in Den Bosch, the Netherlands, and Wilton, San Diego, and Silicon Valley in the US. Our D&E senior management delivered presentations on the conference’s theme, 'Today we create a new tomorrow', explaining ASML’s history of ‘dreaming big’ and how we make these dreams a reality. The conference is also an occasion to recognize employees who have made outstanding contributions to our technology and innovation. An engineer from our EUV Scanner Plasma group received this year's Global Inventor Award, in recognition of his contribution to 170 inventions since 2001. We also presented the ‘Best Customer Solution’ and the ‘Best Innovation’ award. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EU supports ASML and high-tech partners in Pin3s project
Led by ASML, a group of European companies and research institutes started the Pin3s research pilot project into 3 nm semiconductor technology in December 2018. The European Union contribute up to €30 million of the total cost of €141.6 million for this project. Our partners in the project include Prodrive, Reden, Sioux CCM, Solmates, Thermo Fisher Scientific (Fei), TU Delft, the University of Twente, VDL ETG, imec and the Applied Materials club. Pin3s is by far the largest of 11 research projects launched under the umbrella of the program ‘European cooperation for electronic components and systems for European leadership’ (Ecsel). Ecsel is a so-called joint undertaking, a public-private partnership established in 2014 by the European Union. It receives €1.17 billion in subsidies from the EU’s Horizon 2020 program. National and regional governments and project participants supplement this subsidy by about €5 billion. This money will be spent on research and innovation in nanoelectronics, cyber technology and system-integration technologies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safety compliance
Our D&E safety competence leads are on hand to provide thorough knowledge about the way of working and design rules around specific safety hazards. The products and tools we develop comply with the EU Safety Directive, customer-specific safety guidelines and semiconductor industry guidelines (SEMI S2). These are identified in the System Performance Specification (SPS) on product safety and compliance, which is updated every three years. We are SEMI S2 compliant for every product type shipped. In 2019, a report confirming SEMI S2 compliance was available for every product type we shipped. We also have a CE declaration of conformity for all ASML products and tools. With the influx of new people into ASML, we are in the process of addressing the challenge of training people up in the latest product-safety requirements. In 2019, we developed specific baseline CBT (computer-based training) to meet this need, which is in the process of being rolled out. |
|
|
|
|
•
|
Dangerous materials and shipment of dangerous materials (such as strong magnets that could cause interference with navigation, high-pressure items, filter purifiers, etc.). We launched a special project looking into dangerous goods, relating specifically to best practice around the shipping of dangerous goods.
|
•
|
Safety requirements for suppliers. We have a number of ongoing pilot projects, looking at, for example, how suppliers design electrical, pressure and laser systems. Outsourcing sub-parts can present quality challenges, as quality issues could end up in our machines without our knowledge. As the end supplier, we have to be sure we guard against safety breaches.
|
•
|
Legislation and compliance worldwide. A key focus is for us to thoroughly familiarize ourselves with the rules and standards in countries we ship to and how these countries interpret these rules. In many cases, rules are interpreted in different ways. These differences need to be addressed and managed.
|
|
|
|
|
RoHS and REACH
We are committed to complying with EU guidelines for handling hazardous materials and chemicals, the so-called RoHS directive and the REACH regulation, even though the products we manufacture are currently excluded from the RoHS directive. We aim to, whenever possible, reduce and eliminate use of hazardous substances and replace non-compliant parts with RoHS-compliant alternatives. REACH regulation is ever changing, which presents a potential challenge. Each year, there are new additions to the hazardous substances list. We are proactive in reviewing these, approaching our supply chain and investigating whether it's likely that any of these could end up in our products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promising startups
In 2019, ASML and its partners in the Eindhoven Startup Alliance set up three promising startup companies. One developed an innovative cooling device for high-performance computers, a product that has sparked interest from companies such as Intel and IBM. Another startup uses particle-accelerating technology to make a new generation of scanning devices for parcels sent by post, which can be used to detect illegal substances and security checks. This company was selected as one of eight finalists out of a total of 80 companies that responded to a challenge by US Homeland Security to come up with innovative solutions to address the opioid crisis. |
|
|
|
|
KPI
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Target 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
R&D expenses (in billion €)
|
1.3
|
|
1.6
|
|
2.0
|
|
n/a
|
Investment in R&D partners (in billion €)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0.5
|
|
n/a
|
Number of R&D partner agencies
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
144
|
|
n/a
|
Startups reached Star level from total
startups supported (in %) |
—
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
%
|
> 20%
|
Number of scale up companies supported (in #)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDG target
|
|
How we measure our performance
|
||
|
|
SDG target 9.1 - Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all
SDG target 9.4 - By 2030, upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, with all countries taking action in accordance with their respective capabilities
SDG target 9.5 - Enhance scientific research, upgrade technological capabilities of industrial sectors in all countries, in particular developing countries. For developing countries, this includes, by 2030, encouraging innovation and increasing the number of research and development workers per one million people, as well as public and private research and development spending
|
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
|
Supporting startups to Star level
Supporting scaleup projects
Collaboration in EU projects
Collaboration with research partners
Energy efficiency of our products measured per wafer pass
Investments in R&D
Collaboration with R&D partner agencies
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-alignment meetings
We run these regularly with our key customers. These meetings, among others, include our Executive Review Meetings, at which members of our senior management team and Board of Management discuss business and strategies with customers; Technology Review Meetings, at which our senior technology experts and CTO discuss technology plans and requirements with customers, and Operational Review Meetings, where we review topics related to our customers’ operational activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer support
With more than 5,900 customer-support employees, including service engineers and applications specialists, we make sure our systems in our customers’ fabs are running smoothly. We offer 24/7 support and provide training for customer engineers. We work together with our customers to find solutions to continuously improve our installed base performance in a rapidly changing environment. |
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The Customer Loyalty Survey is held every two years.
|
2.
|
Measured on a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 being the top score.
|
|
|
|
|
Career-development opportunities
Developing our people is crucial to the sustained success of our business. Employee development is never a straight line because employees are at different stages in their employee journey and have different needs. We offer various career paths and have various tools in place to support our employees’ career navigation. We continuously look into ways to improve how we can help employees identify opportunities for professional development within ASML. To this end, we have started a project to refresh our employee career-track tool. We want to guide them in deciding how to fill any potential gaps in their competencies and what action we need to take for their long-term career development. Together, managers and employees define individual Development Action Plans (DAPs). We also deployed a new behavioral and soft skills-training curriculum, replacing the previous one. It now offers a better mix of computer based training (CBT), video and classroom teaching. Strengthening leadership skills In 2019, we continued our efforts to optimize our Management Development Curriculum. We are aiming for a uniform, company-wide approach to ensure management training is more effective and efficient. Our Management Development Curriculum aims to support the development of leaders at all levels. This includes basic management, managing managers and authentic leadership skills. In addition, we have leadership programs where we fast-track the careers of our most promising managers through our Potential Acceleration Program. To ensure our managers are aware of what’s expected from them and help them develop the skills and competencies they need, we offer programs to help them become better leaders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brand awareness
Our main goal in increasing brand awareness is for us to become better known and for our audience to remember at least three defining qualities about us: that we are a creative and ambitious high-tech company in the semiconductor industry, that we seek to connect our engineering to our ambition to have a positive impact on the world, and that we are an attractive employer. Strong brand awareness allows us to feed the future talent pipeline and attract top talent from around the globe. In 2019, we ran a project to measure and better manage how we are perceived as an employer. First, we studied how ASML is perceived among potential employees, such as engineers, software and IT specialists, and students, in the countries where we recruit. Using employer brand-awareness surveys and employer rankings from different countries, including the Netherlands, the US and Korea, we were able to measure ASML’s employer brand awareness at national levels. We used this data to develop tailored messages about our employee value proposition for each of our recruitment markets. We can also use this messaging for tailored labor market communications efforts for each country. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Living wage
At ASML, we are confident that we meet adequate living-wage requirements, meaning that employees earn salaries that meet their and their families' basic needs but also provides some discretionary income. Our company has a predominantly highly educated workforce with relatively high levels of remuneration. In 2019, we conducted an analysis of how our lowest base salary compared to the local minimum wage and local ‘living wage’ in the countries and regions where we operate. We did not detect any gaps. On average, our salaries are significantly above local living wage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today we design a safe tomorrow
We aim for ‘triple-safe’ status, built on these pillars:
Safe People We encourage our colleagues to behave safely and Speak Up
Safe Product We design safe products and tools by using common standards and our common sense
Safe Process We share our knowledge and experience proactively to ensure a safe way of working
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘EHS Fundamentals’ e-learning launches
To support employees in understanding ASML’s basic safety rules and desired behaviors, we developed our new ‘EHS Fundamentals’ training. In 2019, during a phased roll-out, all employees received an automated invite from our myLearning system to complete this short but vital training. In the training, employees follow four colleagues throughout their day at ASML and all the safety-related situations they encounter. They earn points as they help colleagues make the right choices with regard to safe behavior. This serves to help employees become better acquainted with the basic rules, signs and general safety features at ASML.
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Build attractive communities
|
2.
|
STEM education in local communities
|
3.
|
Charity and global projects
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
The social value we create
ASML is growing fast and we’re continuously looking for talented people. The current job market is competitive, and we know that people often make career choices based on more than just the job itself. It’s important for us to create an attractive environment for current and future employees and their families that helps them become part of their local community and connect to new friends. |
|
||
|
Key programs
|
Results
|
|
||
|
•
|
Event sponsoring and government engagement: Through our sponsoring program, we support organizations and events such as sports teams and cultural activities.
|
Netherlands: We supported Cityfest, a new cultural festival in Veldhoven. CityFest's 'Keep it vibrant' program covers a broad scope of ages and interests, and includes local bands, dance, pop, classical music, live acts, street musicians and a kids' square.
Netherlands: Every year, ASML organizes a music festival, 'ASML on stage', for employees and their friends. The festival covers all kind of music styles, from hard rock to classical music, from folk to dance. The festival, attended by around 2,000 people, was held in the Muziekgebouw in Eindhoven. US: in San Diego, employees and family/friends took part in a bike tour to raise money for Multiple Sclerosis research and funding. |
|
|
|
•
|
Working with regional partners: We're working with our partners in Brainport Eindhoven to make the region more attractive to live and work.
|
Netherlands: Through the Brainport National Action Agenda, we support initiatives related to sports, culture and education.
|
|
|
|
•
|
ASML is driving an initiative to promote sustainable transport and ensure the region is accessible for all.
|
Netherlands: We aim to significantly reduce the number of cars on our campus at Veldhoven. We encourage our employees to use public transportation, and we also actively promote the use of e-bikes for a healthy commute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
The social value we create
To help usher in this new digital age, we look for ways to get more closely involved in education. For many years, ASML technology ambassadors have given guest lectures at primary and secondary schools and technology events around the world, passing on their passion for technology and science to the next generation. We’ve also invited school-age children into our workspaces to give them a glimpse of what we do and what we aim to achieve. |
|
||
|
Key programs
|
Results
|
|
||
|
•
|
Promote STEM initiatives worldwide
|
Netherlands: To address the shortage of STEM teachers, we created the hybrid teaching program. We’re not only growing our number of technology ambassadors but also enabling 100 engineers in the Netherlands to become part-time or ‘hybrid’ teachers, paid by ASML. We expect to start this program in 2020, and, looking ahead, plan to expand it to the US and Asia.
US: ASML San Diego supported the EXPO Day where employees helped promote STEM education at Petco Park during the San Diego Festival of Science & Engineering by showing kids how to program robots. Asia: In Shanghai, ASML supported the 2nd ASML Youth Maker and Hacker Science & Technology Innovation. Some 80 school children from 15 elementary and secondary schools took part in the contest. The contest was designed to promote science education and inspire more students to choose STEM in their future education and careers. |
|
|
|
•
|
We run an intensive technology promotion program to boost interest in technology among young people and increase the local and regional talent pool. We also raise awareness of career prospects in a sector offering many development opportunities.
|
Netherlands: In Eindhoven, ASML participated in the Night of the Nerds event during Dutch Technology week. The Night of the Nerds is a festival were young people, aged between 14 and 19, can learn more about technology and participate in various workshops. The event attracted about 5,000 people.
Asia: ASML is proud to sponsor the Taiwan Railways Fair of Popular Science. This national project, held by the Ministry of Science and Technology, aims to inspire and engage more than 9,000 primary school students from 23 cities in Taiwan. We cooperated with 80 SPIE/OSA Student Chapters from six universities in Taiwan to host a unique Optical Sciences train cabin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
The social value we create
By working outside of ASML and by meeting people that are not part of our everyday lives, we learn a lot and make new friends. Our world becomes bigger and we realize we can make an impact that goes beyond the realm of technology. |
|
||
|
Key programs
|
Results
|
|
||
|
•
|
Employee Volunteering program: We encourage our employees to work one day per year as volunteers to lend a helping hand.
|
We contributed more than 7,500 hours of volunteering work in 2019. Among our volunteering activities, we paint shelters, repair playgrounds, work in nature, clean beaches or take elderly people out for a day of fun. Groups of employees also get together to organize food drives or make sure that children from financially disadvantaged homes receive Christmas presents.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Sponsorship and charity program: We want to offer opportunities for all people in our communities.
|
For example, ASML is one of the sponsors of the PSV Eindhoven football club. We donate tickets from our sponsorship allocation to families who are not able to afford to attend matches.
We also have a new partnership with the Van Gogh Museum, where we will use our research capabilities to help preserve Van Gogh's artwork. At Vincentre in Nuenen, we initiated the creation of Vincent's Lightlab where visitors can learn about light, technology and art. |
|
|
|
•
|
Partnership for education programs through ASML Foundation.
|
In 2019, the ASML Foundation supported 17 projects in seven countries and committed about €0.9 million. The Foundation is our charity of choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
The ASML Foundation focuses especially on the UN’s fourth Sustainable Development Goal: to ensure inclusive and quality education for all and promote lifelong learning. The ASML Foundation aims to increase the self-sufficiency of disadvantaged children through educational initiatives that develop their talent and help unlock their potential. Although closely linked to our company, the ASML Foundation operates independently.
The ASML Foundation mainly supports projects in the regions where ASML operates: Asia, Europe and the US. These projects address the specific needs in that region. In the US for example, projects mainly focus on preventing school dropouts in underprivileged areas, and on the promotion of STEM, especially for girls. Projects in Asia differ per country. In developing areas in Asia, for example, projects focus on education for girls to prevent child marriages and on vocational training for young people to increase their self-sufficiency. In China, the focus is on STEM for girls in rural areas. In Europe, and in the Netherlands specifically, the foundation focuses on education for disadvantaged children, and children lacking in education, providing help that suits the children’s specific needs. We encourage our employees to support the ASML Foundation, either financially or through volunteer work. |
|
|
|
|
Examples of projects supported in 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
Since 2018, the ASML Foundation has partnered with PLAN International to promote girls in technology. Titled ‘STEM - Girls Can Do It’, the project focuses on young people in rural China, near ASML’s offices in Chengdu and Xi’an. It aims to promote more gender-balanced STEM education. The project will expose about 1,200 young people, of which 70% are girls, to science, technology, engineering and mathematics, and teach them coding and programming. Employees from the local ASML offices are actively involved in the partnership, by hosting events at ASML’s offices and by introducing female engineers as role models.
|
|
|
|
|
We continued our relationship with the YT Lee Foundation in Taiwan, an organization aimed at getting children from underprivileged families interested in technology. The program, which runs from 2019 to 2022, also focuses on training teachers to provide the type of education that will excite youngsters about technology. The aim is to reach 20 teachers and 1,500 students in three years.
|
|
|
|
|
In Connecticut in the US, we support a program focused on developing a diverse talent pool by creating better access to opportunities for prospective software technology students. This is mostly directed at women and youngsters from marginalized backgrounds.
|
|
|
|
|
We are also collaborating with Closing the Loop, which provides closed-loop solutions for mobile phones. We collect used mobile phones at ASML’s premises in Veldhoven, and Closing the Loop uses these to finance the recycling of used mobile phones in developing countries.
|
|
|
|
|
For more information, visit www.asmlfoundation.org. |
|
|
|
|
|
KPI
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Target 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Engagement score We@ASML survey 1
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
77
|
%
|
Be on par with peers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employer brand ranking
(from Universum: Engineering students) 2 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Netherlands
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
Top 10
|
US
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
In ranking in 2020
|
China
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Top 100
|
Taiwan
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
To be determined in 2020
|
South Korea
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
19
|
|
Top 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDG target
|
|
How we measure our performance
|
||
|
|
SDG target 4.3 - By 2030, ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education, including university
SDG target 4.4 - By 2030, substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship SDG target 4.5 - By 2030, eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education and vocational training for the vulnerable, including persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples and children in vulnerable situations |
•
•
•
•
•
|
Employee training and development indicators
Diversity indicators
Community involvement and technology promotions
Scholarships granted
ASML Foundation projects
|
|
|
SDG target 8.1 - Sustain per capita economic growth in accordance with national circumstances and, in particular, at least 7% gross domestic product growth per annum in the least developed countries
SDG target 8.2 - Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading and innovation, including through a focus on high value-added and labor-intensive sectors SDG target 8.5 - By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value SDG target 8.6 - By 2020, substantially reduce the proportion of youth not in employment, education or training SDG target 8.8 - Protect labor rights and promote safe and secure working environments for all workers, including migrant workers, in particular women migrants, and those in precarious employment |
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
|
Financial performance
Human capital return on investment
Employee engagement score
Workforce data including diversity and inclusion
Fair renumeration pay ratio
Employee attrition rate
New hires
Employee safety indicators
|
|
|
|
|
Product and non-product related suppliers
With around 5,000 suppliers in our total supplier base, we distinguish between product-related and non-product related suppliers. Product-related suppliers provide materials, equipment, parts and tools used directly to produce our systems. This category comprises 790 suppliers and represents the highest percentage of our procurement volume, accounting for 66% of our total spend. Our product-related critical suppliers are accountable for 95% of the product-related spend. Non product-related suppliers are goods and services suppliers, providing products and services supporting our operations, varying from temp labor to logistics and from cafeteria services to IT services. With over 4,200 suppliers, this group represents nearly 85% of our total supplier base in terms of the number of suppliers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building relationships
One of the ways we foster a strong relationship with suppliers is through our annual Supplier Day in Veldhoven. In 2019, around 225 representatives from 135 PR and NPR suppliers from across the globe attended the event. This event is an opportunity for our suppliers to familiarize themselves with our strategy and targets, host workshops and presentations, and meet our senior management, including our Chief Strategy Officer and Chief Technology Officer. We also invited quality specialists from our suppliers to our ‘crossing events’. Organized twice a year by our Supplier Network Management department, these meetings serve as a platform to discuss operational improvements for our products, such as improvements in quality or production volume. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplier Day 2019
On September 26, representatives from our key suppliers joined our Supplier Day at the High Tech Campus Eindhoven. This year’s theme, ‘Make it Worth it’, focused on enhancing collaboration to ensure the future success of the industry. Supplier Day is held annually to update our suppliers on the market outlook, our priorities, focus areas and commitments, through breakout sessions, panel discussions, Q&A and presentations.
We finished the day with an awards presentation, recognizing several suppliers for their work with ASML, including an award to a supplier for its valuable contribution to ASML’s circular-economy ambitions.
|
|
|
|
|
KPI
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Target 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
RBA self-assessment completed (in %) 1
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
78
|
%
|
90
|
%
|
Suppliers with high risk on sustainability elements evaluated and follow-up agreed (in %) 2
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
25
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDG target
|
|
How we measure our performance
|
||
|
|
SDG target 8.8 - Protect labor rights and promote safe and secure working environments for all workers, including migrant workers, in particular women migrants, and those in precarious employment
|
•
•
•
|
Compliance with RBA Code of Conduct
RBA self-assessment questionnaire completion
Suppliers with high risk on sustainability elements evaluated and follow-up agreed
|
|
|
SDG target 12.2 - By 2030, achieve the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources
|
•
|
Promote circular procurement
|
|
|
|
|
Return4Reuse
We are improving the reuse of packing, locking and transport materials from the field and factory, aiming to return and reuse 80% or more in the next install or relocation.
We aim to embed this new thinking as the new norm and standardize return and reuse. It started with our EUV systems, but we are now expanding the Return 4 Reuse program into our DUV systems. All packing, locking and transport materials are reused at use level (highest level of reuse). The concept is driven by an automated circular process triggering the limited manual interventions to return and reuse the materials by itself. This makes the process sustainable and allows us to focus on increasing the amount of material for reuse. In 2019, around 1.5 million kg of materials were received for further reuse, so preventing it from ending up as waste.
Our focus up to now has been packaging and transport materials used for system installs. But many other activities, including system relocations, As-New returns, and service activities and upgrades also require packaging and transport materials. We aim to involve ASML manufacturing sites worldwide in this reuse process and maximize its impact by standardizing best practice across all business lines.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Circular procurement and circular design
|
•
|
Local waste-reduction programs
|
•
|
Real-estate portfolio management
|
•
|
Return4Reuse
|
•
|
As-New program
|
•
|
Flexible cleanrooms
|
|
|
|
|
New flex cleanroom concept
Cleanrooms are a key part of our field-service warehouse infrastructure. They allow us to support our EUV customers by providing clean tooling to quickly respond to their needs. We've launched a new concept in cleanroom design at three of our service warehouses, reducing waste, cost and construction time. Our new ‘flex’ cleanrooms can move between locations and be assembled quickly, while providing the same standards and performance as our current fixed cleanrooms. The systems’ modular, cross-flow design is also expandable, meaning work does not need to stop when an extra section is added. We built the first flex cleanroom in Pyeongtaek, Korea, with others now added in Taichung and Tainan, Taiwan. More than 95% of the materials in the flex cleanroom system are reusable. This saves money as well as construction time and effort – down from 13-15 weeks for a fixed cleanroom to one to two weeks for a flex cleanroom. The high reuse percentage significantly cuts waste and contributes to a greener approach to cleanroom infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System lifetime
A well-maintained ASML lithography system can last for decades and be used by more than one fab. For example, many ASML lithography systems are used in cutting-edge fabs and are then given a new lease of life in a fab where the manufacturer requires comparatively less sophisticated chips (such as accelerometers or radio-frequency chips). Almost every lithography system that we’ve ever shipped is still in use at a customer fab. |
|
|
|
|
KPI
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Target 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total waste generated normalized to revenue
(kg/Million €) 1 |
—
|
|
—
|
|
417
|
|
-50% from 2019 baseline
|
|
Material recovery (% of total waste) 1
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
80
|
%
|
85
|
%
|
ASML PAS systems sold still in use (in %)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Construction waste is excluded from the calculation of this indicator, because this waste is not resulting from the daily operations of ASML. The amount of construction waste tends to fluctuate over the years and can therefore make the trend of the indicator unclear.
|
SDG target
|
|
How we measure our performance
|
||
|
|
SDG target 12.2 - By 2030, achieve the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources
SDG target 12.4 - By 2020, achieve the environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks, and significantly reduce their release to air, water and soil in order to minimize their adverse impacts on human health and the environment
SDG target 12.5 - By 2030, substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse
|
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
|
Material recovery
Promote circular procurement
RoHS / REACH compliance of parts used
Waste reduction
Increase reuse of parts and modules in our products
Lifetime extension of used systems
Reuse of packaging
|
|
|
|
|
Paris Agreement
The Netherlands is part of the UNFCCC and a signatory to the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement’s central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5°C. The Dutch government has set a goal to reduce its GHG emissions by 49% in 2030. Dutch industry's ultimate aim is to be circular and to emit virtually no greenhouse gas by 2050. Factories will then run on sustainable electricity from the sun and wind, or energy from geothermal energy, hydrogen and biogas. By 2030, the industry must already emit considerably less CO2. That is an intermediate step on the way to full sustainability. Politicians can implement measures to achieve these goals, such as implementing carbon-pricing mechanisms to reduce GHG emissions.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Less energy per wafer output. We enable innovative growth in the semiconductor industry by increasing the productivity of ASML’s lithography tools. In addition, by enhancing resolution with EUV and High-NA, together with holistic scaling of overlay and pattern fidelity control, we enhance energy efficiency.
|
•
|
Responsible use of energy by committing to only using the energy we need.
|
•
|
Contributing to energy-efficient fabs by providing more energy-efficient installation solutions.
|
•
|
Improving cooling architecture to enable ‘free cooling’ by using warmer cooling water to remove the heat in the lithography scanner and its source. We are also exploring if some electronic parts of the EUV system can operate at higher cooling water temperatures. This would reduce the amount of energy needed for cooling purposes in these systems.
|
•
|
Reducing unnecessary power consumption of electronics by, for example, improving the architecture and design of these electronics.
|
•
|
Alternatives for hydrogen abatement including investigating hydrogen recycling with third parties.
|
|
|
|
|
Enabling energy efficient chips
The power needed for every computation on a digital electronic device can be reduced by shrinking the size of transistors on chips. Our lithography systems enable the resolution required to realize this shrink, and our customers use these systems to produce higher-density chips. Overall, this high density translates into the use of fewer natural resources and less energy consumption per transistor over a chip’s lifetime compared to older-generation chips. Consumers’ devices are becoming ever-more sophisticated and include more functionalities. Our lithography system makes the chips possible that enable the advances of these applications. While our products are becoming more energy efficient, our customers’ customers are also using resources in a more efficient way, such as more energy-efficient datacenters, smart energy water meters, and so on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee buy-in for action on climate change
We informed employees about our ongoing sustainability projects on World Environment Day in June. We celebrated this event for the first time to enhance awareness around the importance of environmental care and get employee buy-in. For example, nine presenters shared the ambition and progress of their projects. We called on employees to take action wherever possible to make a positive impact on the environment. In total, we submitted 14 business challenge proposals to our employees. These challenges include ways to contribute to a sustainable environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustainable facilities
To facilitate flexible growth for our future, we are building a new campus in Veldhoven. Our aim is to create a workplace that makes our employees feel engaged and want to thrive. The campus will reflect a unified ASML identity and ‘look and feel’, while also celebrating our diversity. There will also be a sustainability focus for this new build. Its design and use of materials will be assessed on sustainability performance using BREEAM guidelines. We want to achieve a BREEAM score of ‘excellent’. This ranking will ensure that our campus, its buildings and the way we manage and operate our facilities is sustainable. |
|
|
|
|
KPI
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Target 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Renewable electricity (of total electricity purchased)
|
70.2
|
%
|
86.3
|
%
|
96.6
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Fossil fuels consumed (in TJ) by location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Veldhoven
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
Wilton
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
Linkou
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
San Diego
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
316
|
|
See scope 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
System energy efficiency NXE:3x00 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
System
|
—
|
|
NXE:3400B
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Throughput
|
—
|
|
107
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Measured energy efficiency (kWh / wafer pass) 2
|
—
|
|
10.6
|
|
—
|
|
-60% from 2018 baseline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Scope 1 CO2 emissions (in kton) 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gross
|
19.0
|
|
17.5
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
Net
|
19.0
|
|
17.5
|
|
16.9
|
|
0.0
|
|
Scope 2 CO2 emissions (in kton) 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gross
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
141.4
|
|
|
|
Net
|
27.6
|
|
15.4
|
|
5.3
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDG target
|
|
How we measure our performance
|
||
|
|
SDG target 13.1 - Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries
|
•
•
•
•
|
Energy efficiency of our products measured per waferpass
Renewable electricity strategy
Scope 1 and 2 emissions
Optimize real estate to enhance energy efficiency
|
|
'Major innovation drivers such as artificial intelligence, 5G, high-performance computing, autonomous driving and big data are resulting in an increased demand for leading edge nodes'
|
Roger Dassen, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Year ended December 31
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
(in millions, unless otherwise indicated)
|
€
|
|
%1
|
€
|
|
%1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
10,944.0
|
|
|
11,820.0
|
|
|
Increase in total net sales (%)
|
22.1
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
Net system sales
|
8,259.1
|
|
|
8,996.2
|
|
|
Net service and field option sales
|
2,684.9
|
|
|
2,823.8
|
|
|
Sales of lithography systems (in units) 2
|
224
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
Immersion systems recognized (in units)
|
86
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
EUV systems recognized (in units)
|
18
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Profitability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
5,029.2
|
|
46.0
|
5,279.8
|
|
44.7
|
Income from operations
|
2,965.3
|
|
27.1
|
2,790.8
|
|
23.6
|
Net income
|
2,591.6
|
|
23.7
|
2,592.3
|
|
21.9
|
Liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3,121.1
|
|
|
3,532.3
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
913.3
|
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
3,072.7
|
|
|
3,276.4
|
|
|
Free cash flow 3
|
2,463.2
|
|
|
2,390.5
|
|
|
1.
|
As a percentage of total net sales.
|
2.
|
Lithography systems do not include metrology and inspection systems.
|
3.
|
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as net cash provided by operating activities (2019: €3,276.4 million and 2018: €3,072.7 million) minus purchase of property, plant and equipment (2019: €766.6 million and 2018: €574.0 million) and purchase of intangible assets (2019: €119.3 million and 2018: €35.5 million). We believe that free cash flow is an important liquidity metric, reflecting cash that is available for acquisitions, to repay debt and to return money to our shareholders by means of dividends and share buybacks. Purchase of property, plant and equipment and purchase of intangible assets are deducted from net cash provided by operating activities because these payments are necessary to support the maintenance and investments in our assets to maintain the current asset base. Free cash flow therefore provides an alternative measure (in addition to net cash provided by operating activities) for investors to assess our ability to generate cash from our business. For further details about the purchase of property, plant and equipment and the purchase of intangible assets see Consolidated Financial Statements - Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Year ended December 31
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
2018 vs. 2019
|
|
||
(in millions, except per share data)
|
€
|
|
%1
|
|
€
|
|
%1
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net system sales
|
8,259.1
|
|
75.5
|
|
8,996.2
|
|
76.1
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Net service and field option sales
|
2,684.9
|
|
24.5
|
|
2,823.8
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Total net sales
|
10,944.0
|
|
100.0
|
|
11,820.0
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of system sales
|
(4,141.2
|
)
|
(37.8
|
)
|
(4,676.2
|
)
|
(39.6
|
)
|
|
12.9
|
|
Cost of service and field option sales
|
(1,773.6
|
)
|
(16.2
|
)
|
(1,864.0
|
)
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
5.1
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
(5,914.8
|
)
|
(54.0
|
)
|
(6,540.2
|
)
|
(55.3
|
)
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross profit
|
5,029.2
|
|
46.0
|
|
5,279.8
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Research and development costs
|
(1,575.9
|
)
|
(14.4
|
)
|
(1,968.5
|
)
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
24.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative costs
|
(488.0
|
)
|
(4.5
|
)
|
(520.5
|
)
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
6.7
|
|
Income from operations
|
2,965.3
|
|
27.1
|
|
2,790.8
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest and other, net
|
(28.3
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
(25.0
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Income before income taxes
|
2,937.0
|
|
26.8
|
|
2,765.8
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Provision for income taxes
|
(351.6
|
)
|
(3.2
|
)
|
(191.7
|
)
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
(45.5
|
)
|
Income after income taxes
|
2,585.4
|
|
23.6
|
|
2,574.1
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Profit (loss) related to equity method investments
|
6.2
|
|
0.1
|
|
18.2
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
193.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income
|
2,591.6
|
|
23.7
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
1.
|
As a percentage of total net sales.
|
•
|
EUV - Further improving availability and productivity focused on the final stages of industrialization related to our NXE:3400B system, as well as the accelerated introduction of the NXE:3400C. In addition, R&D activities included progressing our roadmap includes High-NA to support our customers with 2 nm logic and beyond
|
•
|
DUV immersion - The industrialization of our latest generation immersion system NXT:2000i, development of our next generation immersion system NXT:2050 and migration of our ArF dry XT platform to our NXT platform. In addition we are completing industrialization of new modules and further improving our roadmaps on alignment/overlay and productivity
|
•
|
Applications - Introduction of HMI multi-beam technology and further development of Yieldstar and process window control solutions
|
•
|
Liquidity: Maintain financial stability with a target to keep our cash & cash equivalents, together with short-term investments, above a minimum range of €2.0 to €2.5 billion
|
•
|
Capital structure: Maintain a capital structure that targets a solid investment grade credit rating
|
•
|
Cash return: Provide a sustainable dividend per share that will grow over time, paid semi-annually, while returning structural excess cash to shareholders on a regular basis through share buybacks or capital repayment
|
•
|
€500 million in 2022.
|
•
|
€750 million in 2023.
|
•
|
€1,000 million in 2026.
|
•
|
€750 million in 2027.
|
|
|
|
||
Year ended December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
2,259.0
|
|
3,121.1
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
3,072.7
|
|
3,276.4
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(491.5
|
)
|
(1,157.5
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(1,724.3
|
)
|
(1,712.3
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash
|
5.2
|
|
4.6
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
862.1
|
|
411.2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
3,121.1
|
|
3,532.3
|
|
Short-term investments
|
913.3
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
4,034.4
|
|
4,718.1
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
|
(609.5
|
)
|
(885.9
|
)
|
Free cash flow
|
2,463.2
|
|
2,390.5
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Total net sales of between €3.1 billion and €3.3 billion
|
•
|
Gross margin of between 46% and 47%
|
•
|
R&D costs of around €550 million
|
•
|
SG&A costs of around €140 million
|
•
|
Effective annualized tax rate of around 13%
|
•
|
Senior management meetings to assess ASML’s corporate initiatives, as well as the execution of our strategy.
|
•
|
Operating and business review meetings with ASML’s senior management. These focus on financial performance, the realization of operating objectives and responses to emerging issues.
|
•
|
Quarterly updates of ASML's risk landscape, aligning key operational risk areas with the Corporate Risk Committee.
|
•
|
ASML's risk universe and risk landscape are aligned with associated risk owners at least once a year.
|
•
|
We execute risk assessments according to the risk management plan and any additional engagement approved by the Corporate Risk Committee.
|
•
|
ASML’s Anti-fraud Policy develops controls to aid in preventing, deterring and detecting fraud against ASML.
|
•
|
Assurance assignments are performed by internal audit.
|
•
|
On a semi-annual basis, ASML’s key senior management members sign letters of representation. These confirm, among other things:
|
–
|
Compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
|
–
|
Adequate processes and controls that enable the preparation of financial statements.
|
–
|
Completeness of transactions and commitments.
|
•
|
There is regular reporting and review by the Supervisory Board.
|
•
|
To address the rapid commercial and technological changes in the semiconductor industry, as well as the increasing complexity in executing our product introduction roadmap, we focus on partnerships, collaboration and knowledge-sharing with our customers and suppliers. We work closely to align roadmaps, oversee execution and ensure we maximize customer value. See What we achieved in 2019 - Technology and innovation ecosystem and Our supply chain.
|
•
|
To address our dependence on a limited number of suppliers, we nurture high-quality and collaborative relationships with our suppliers. We share our expert knowledge, including risks and rewards, so we all work together to achieve cost-effective shrink, boost innovation and enable our industry to grow. See What we achieved in 2019 - Our supply chain.
|
•
|
To address risks related to intellectual property rights, we have developed a management mechanism to not only protect our own intellectual property rights, but also respect the intellectual property of other parties. To protect ourselves from incidents related to cybersecurity, we have set up a broad information-security program, which looks at measures to prevent, detect and respond to security threats.
|
•
|
To address the scarcity of staff with specific technical expertise, we put effort into educating, training and retaining talent. We also promote initiatives that encourage young people to study science, technology and engineering. See What we achieved in 2019 - Our people.
|
•
|
Intellectual property laws may not sufficiently support our proprietary rights or may change in the future in a manner adverse to us;
|
•
|
Patent rights may not be granted or interpreted as we expect;
|
•
|
Patents will expire which may result in key technology becoming widely available that may harm our competitive position;
|
•
|
The steps we take to prevent misappropriation or infringement of our proprietary rights may not be successful; and
|
•
|
Third parties may be able to develop or obtain patents for similar competing technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How we structure our ethics organization
Our ethics governance consists of four levels: |
|
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
|
Our Ethics Board, chaired by our CEO and reporting to the Board of Management, is responsible for policymaking and the supervision of ASML’s compliance with legal and ethical requirements. The Ethics Board meets regularly to give guidance on relevant issues.
Our Ethics Committee investigates significant notifications about potential breaches of ASML's Code of Conduct or Business Principles worldwide.
Our Corporate Ethics Office is responsible for overseeing and implementing our ethics program. All reports of a possible breach of ASML's Code of Conduct and/or Business Principles are screened by the Corporate Ethics Officer and each report is discussed with the Ethics Committee.
Our ethics organization includes employees who, in addition to their regular roles at ASML, act as Ethics Liaisons in all countries we operate in. These serve as trusted representatives and act as the first local point of contact for employees with questions and concerns related to ethics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Respecting Human Rights
We conduct business on the basis of fairness, good faith, and integrity and we expect the same from all those we work with. To this end we also believe that we have the responsibility to respect human rights and contribute to positive impact.
We are committed to respecting universal human rights and honoring the value of ethics as expressed in our Code of Conduct and Business Principles. We support the principles laid down in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and those in the International Labor Organization’s Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy. We have established a Human Rights Policy which is publicly available on www.asml.com.
Our Human Rights Policy complements our ASML Code of Conduct and the Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct we adhere to. It expresses our commitment to human rights and responsible labor practice in our operations and in our supply chain. The Human Rights policy applies to ASML and its controlled subsidiaries anywhere in the world. The overall responsibility for identifying and managing human rights issues in our direct operations falls under the remit of our Executive Vice President HR. Responsibility for human rights in our supply chain falls under the remit of our Executive Vice President & Chief Strategy Officer.
|
|
|||||
|
|
Our Human Rights commitment and principles
|
International human rights standards and guidelines
|
|
|
||
|
|
•
•
•
••
••
•
•
•
•
|
Diversity & Non-discrimination, including equal opportunities. For more information, see section Promoting diversity & inclusion and Fair remuneration
No child labor. Minimum age of employment is aged 18, as such the UN convention on the rights of the child, in which ‘child’ is defined as everyone under the age of 18, is not applicable. Age verification is included in our recruitment process.
Freedom of association & collective bargaining. For more information, see section Labor relations
Working hours & work-life balance
Minimum wage standard & living wage. For more information, see section Fair remuneration
Harassment prohibition
Workplace safety. For more information, see section Employee safety and Product safety
Freely Chosen Employment. We prohibit any form of slavery, forced and bonded labor, forced child labor and/or human trafficking.
Human Rights in our supply chain. We expect our suppliers to adhere to the Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, which includes labor, ethical, health & safety and environmental standards. For more information, see section Responsible supply chain
Grievance mechanism & Speak Up. For more information, see section Encourage people to Speak Up
Public reporting
|
○
○
○
○
○
|
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Convention 1- 8)
UN Global Compact (principle 1 -6)
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (protect and respect human rights and access to remedy)
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct (labor, ethical, health & safety and environmental standards)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.
|
Working hours and overtime
|
b.
|
Health & safety
|
c.
|
Workplace harassment
|
|
|
|
|
Our tax principles
We base our tax principles on our Code of Conduct and our Business Principles. It guides us in how we report and pay tax in the countries we operate in.
•
We act in accordance with tax laws and regulations.
•
We report taxable income in a jurisdiction commensurate with the added value of the business activities in that jurisdiction.
•
We do not use tax structures intended for tax avoidance, nor will we engage in the artificial transfer of profits to low tax jurisdictions.
•
We do not use tax havens (as defined by the European Commission’s ‘blacklist’) for tax-avoidance purposes.
•
We pursue an open and constructive dialogue with the tax authorities in the jurisdictions we operate in, based on mutual respect, transparency and trust, disclosing all relevant facts and circumstances.
•
We endorse and follow the OECD transfer pricing guidelines. ASML’s profit allocation methods are based on internationally accepted standards as published by the OECD, as well as relevant rules and regulations in the local jurisdictions we operate in.
•
We make tax disclosures in accordance with reporting requirements, US GAAP and IFRS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter T.F.M. Wennink (1957, Dutch)
Term expires 2022 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chair of Board of Management Mr. Wennink joined ASML in 1999 and was appointed as Executive Vice President, CFO and member of our Board of Management at the 1999 AGM. Mr. Wennink was appointed as President and CEO in 2013. Mr. Wennink has an extensive background in finance and accounting. Prior to his employment with ASML, he worked as a partner at Deloitte Accountants B.V., specializing in the high-technology industry with an emphasis on the semiconductor equipment industry. Mr. Wennink is a member of the Dutch Institute of Registered Accountants, a member of the supervisory board of the Eindhoven University of Technology, and a member of the Advisory Board of the Investment Committee of Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP (Dutch pension fund for government employees). He also serves on the board of the FME-CWM (the employers’ organization for the technology industry in the Netherlands) and is chairman of the Eindhovensche Fabrikantenkring. |
|
|
|
Martin A. van den Brink (1957, Dutch)
Term expires 2022 President, Chief Technology Officer and Vice Chair of Board of Management Mr. Van den Brink joined ASML when the company was founded in 1984. Mr. Van den Brink held several positions in engineering and from 1995 he served as Vice President Technology. He was appointed as Executive Vice President Product & Technology and member of the Board of Management at the 1999 AGM. Mr. Van den Brink was appointed as President and CTO in 2013. Mr. Van den Brink earned a degree in Electrical Engineering from HTS Arnhem (HAN University), and a degree in Physics (1984) from the University of Twente, the Netherlands. Mr. Van den Brink was awarded an honorary doctorate in physics by the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in 2012. |
|
|
|
Roger J.M. Dassen (1965, Dutch)
Term expires 2022 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Mr. Dassen joined ASML in June, 2018 and was appointed as Executive Vice President and CFO and member of our Board of Management at the 2018 AGM. Prior to joining ASML, Mr. Dassen was the Global Vice Chair and member of the Executive Board of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Before that, he was the CEO of Deloitte Holding B.V. Mr. Dassen earned a Master’s degree in Economics and Business Administration (1988), University of Maastricht; a post-master in Auditing (1990), University of Maastricht; and a PhD in Business Administration (1995). Mr. Dassen is a professor of auditing at the Free University of Amsterdam and serves as a member of the Supervisory Board of the Dutch National Bank. He is also the Chair of the Supervisory Board of the Maastricht University Medical Center+. |
|
|
|
Frits J. van Hout (1960, Dutch)
Term expires 2021 Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer Mr. Van Hout joined ASML in 1984 and rejoined ASML in 2001, after an eight-year absence. He was appointed as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and became a member of our BoM at the 2009 AGM. Mr. Van Hout served as Executive Vice President and Chief Program Officer from July 1, 2013 and was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer effective April 1, 2018. Prior to his BoM membership, Mr. Van Hout served as ASML’s Executive Vice President Integral Efficiency, Senior Vice President Customer Support and held various other positions. Mr. Van Hout served as CEO of the Beyeler Group and held various management positions at Datacolor International from 1992 until 2001. Mr. Van Hout earned a Master’s degree in Theoretical Physics (1981), University of Oxford; and a Master’s degree in Applied Physics (1984), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich. Mr. Van Hout is a member of the Board of the Stichting Brainport, the Eindhoven Region Economic Development Board and Stichting Continuiteit BE Semiconductor Industries, deputy Chair of the Supervisory Board of Aixtron SE as well as member of the Supervisory Board of Bambi Belt Holding B.V and Stichting PhotonDelta. |
|
|
|
Christophe D. Fouquet (1973, French)
Term expires 2022 Executive Vice President EUV Mr. Fouquet joined ASML in 2008 and was appointed as Executive Vice President EUV and became a member of our BoM at the 2018 AGM. Mr. Fouquet has held several positions at ASML, including Executive Vice President Applications, which he has held from 2013 until 2018. Prior to joining ASML, Mr. Fouquet worked at semiconductor equipment peers KLA Tencor and Applied Materials. Mr. Fouquet earned a degree in Physics at the Institut Polytechnique de Grenoble. |
|
|
|
Frédéric J.M. Schneider-Maunoury (1961, French)
Term expires 2022 Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer Mr. Schneider-Maunoury joined ASML in December, 2009, as Executive Vice President and COO and was appointed to our BoM at the 2010 AGM. Prior to joining ASML, Mr. Schneider-Maunoury served as Vice President Thermal Products Manufacturing of the power generation and rail transport equipment group ALSTOM. Previously, Mr. Schneider-Maunoury was general manager of the worldwide Hydro Business of ALSTOM. Mr. Schneider-Maunoury also held various positions at the French Ministry of Trade and Industry. Mr. Schneider-Maunoury is a graduate of Ecole Polytechnique (1985) and Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines (1988) in Paris. |
|
Gerard J. Kleisterlee (1946, Dutch)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2015; second term expires in 2023 Chair of the Supervisory Board, Chair of the Selection and Nomination Committee and member of the Technology Committee Mr. Kleisterlee was the President and CEO of the Board of Management of Royal Philips N.V. from 2001 until 2011, after having worked at Philips from 1974 onwards. Currently, Mr. Kleisterlee is the Chair of the Board of Vodafone Group Plc. and the Deputy Chair and Senior Independent Director of Royal Dutch Shell Plc. |
|
|
|
Antoinette (Annet) P. Aris (1958, Dutch)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2015; second term expires in 2020 Member of Technology Committee and Selection and Nomination Committee Ms. Aris is Senior Affiliate of Strategy at INSEAD, France, a position she has held since 2003. From 1994 to 2003 Ms. Aris was a partner at McKinsey & Company in Germany. Currently, Ms. Aris is a member of the supervisory boards of Jungheinrich AG, Randstad Holding N.V. and Rabobank Group. |
|
|
|
Clara (Carla) M.S. Smits-Nusteling (1966, Dutch)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2013; second term expires in 2021 Chair of the Audit Committee Ms. Smits-Nusteling was CFO and a member of the Board of Management of Royal KPN N.V. from 2009 until 2012. Prior to that, Ms. Smits-Nusteling held several finance and business related positions at Royal KPN N.V. and PostNL. Currently, Ms. Smits-Nusteling is the Chair of the Board of Tele2 AB, a member of the Management Board of the Foundation Unilever N.V. Trust Office, Non-Executive Director of the Board of Directors of Nokia Corporation and lay judge of the Enterprise Court of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. |
|
|
|
Douglas A. Grose (1950, American)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2013, second term expires 2021 Vice Chair of the Supervisory Board, Chair of the Technology Committee and member of the Selection and Nomination Committee Mr. Grose was CEO of GlobalFoundries from 2009 until 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Grose served as senior vice president of technology development, manufacturing and supply chain for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. He also spent 25 years at IBM as General Manager of technology development and manufacturing for the systems and technology group. Currently, Mr. Grose is a member of the Board of Directors of SBA Materials, Inc., and President of NY CREATES (New York Center of Research, Economic Advancement, Technology, Engineering and Science. |
|
|
|
Johannes (Hans) M.C. Stork (1954, American)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2014; second term expires in 2022 Member of the Technology Committee and the Remuneration Committee Mr. Stork is Senior Vice President and CTO of ON Semiconductor Corporation, a position he has held since 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Stork held various management positions at IBM Corporation, Hewlett Packard Company, Texas Instruments, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc., including Senior Vice President and CTO of Texas Instruments, Inc. and Group Vice President and CTO of Applied Materials, Inc. He was also a member of the Board of Sematech. Currently, Mr. Stork is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of imec. |
|
|
|
Terri L. Kelly (1961, American)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2018; first term expires in 2022 Member of the Remuneration Committee Ms. Kelly was the President and Chief Executive Officer at W.L. Gore & Associates Inc. from 2005 until April 1, 2018, after having worked at Gore since 1983 in various roles, including management positions. Ms. Kelly served on the board of directors of Gore through July 2018. Currently, Ms. Kelly serves as Trustee of The Nemours Foundation, Vice-Chair of the University of Delaware and Trustee of the Unidel Foundation. She is also a member of the Board of Directors of United Rentals, Inc. |
|
|
|
Rolf-Dieter Schwalb (1952, German)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2015; second term expires in 2023 Chair of the Remuneration Committee and member of the Audit Committee Mr. Schwalb was CFO and member of the Board of Management of Royal DSM N.V. from 2006 to 2014. Prior to that, he was CFO and member of the Executive Board of Beiersdorf AG. He held a variety of management positions in Finance, IT and Internal Audit at Beiersdorf AG and Procter & Gamble Co. |
|
|
|
Wolfgang H. Ziebart (1950, German)
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2009; fourth term expires in 2020 Member of the Technology Committee and the Audit Committee Mr. Ziebart was President and CEO of Infineon Technologies A.G. from 2004 until 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Ziebart was on the Boards of Management of car components manufacturer Continental A.G. and automobile producer BMW A.G. Currently, he is the Chair of the supervisory board of Nordex SE, a member of the supervisory board of Webasto SE and a member of the Board of Veoneer, Inc. |
|
'The Supervisory Board is comfortable with ASML’s chosen strategy and we will keep a keen eye on the identified key issues to ensure ASML can realize its full potential'
|
Gerard Kleisterlee, Chair of the Supervisory Board
|
|
•
|
Transparent - The policy and its execution are clear and practical;
|
•
|
Aligned - The Remuneration Policy is aligned with the policy for ASML senior management and other ASML employees;
|
•
|
Long-term oriented - The incentives focus on long-term value creation;
|
•
|
Compliant - ASML adopts the highest standards of good corporate governance; and
|
•
|
Simple - The policy and its execution are as simple as possible and easily understandable to all stakeholders.
|
Reference group composition
|
|
|
|
AkzoNobel
|
Leonardo-Finmeccanica
|
Alstom
|
Linde
|
Continental
|
Nokia
|
Covestro
|
Philips
|
DSM
|
SAP
|
Essilor
|
Schindler
|
Evonik
|
Shire
|
Givaudan
|
Smith & Nephew
|
Infineon Technologies
|
Solvay
|
Legrand
|
Yara International
|
|
|
1.
|
Every year, prior to the performance period, the Supervisory Board chooses several financial measures, depending on business challenges and circumstances, with a total weight of 60%.
|
Measure
|
Description
|
|
|
Sales
|
Total net sales as included in the US GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements
|
Gross Margin
|
Gross Profit as a percentage of total net sales
|
R&D opex
|
R&D costs as included in the US GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements
|
SG&A opex
|
SG&A costs as included in the US GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements
|
EBITDA Margin %
|
Income from operations (plus depreciation and amortization) as percentage of total net sales
|
EBIT Margin %
|
Income from operations as percentage of total net sales
|
Net Margin %
|
Net income as a percentage of total net sales
|
Free Cash Flow
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities minus purchases of Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
|
Cash Conversion Cycle 1
|
Days Inventory Outstanding + Days Sales Outstanding -/- Days Payable Outstanding
|
Capital Expenditures
|
Investment in fixed assets
|
|
|
1.
|
The Supervisory Board could also decide to focus on certain elements of Cash Conversion Cycle in any year, i.e. Days Inventory Outstanding, Days Sales Outstanding and / or Days Payable Outstanding, instead of Cash Conversion Cycle only.
|
•
|
ASML’s total shareholder return compared to a reference index.
|
•
|
ASML’s ROAIC compared to a pre-defined target to be set by the Supervisory Board prior to the performance period.
|
•
|
Long-term strategic qualitative targets to ensure ASML’s ability to keep performing at high standards. Depending on the strategic requirements, the definition and relative weight may change at the discretion of the Supervisory Board:
|
•
|
ASML’s relative change in share price, plus dividends paid over the relevant performance period. The total shareholder return is calculated as the difference between (i) the average (closing) share price during the last quarter of the performance period and (ii) the average (closing) share price during the quarter preceding the performance period; in the calculation, dividends are reinvested at the ex-dividend date. The total shareholder return of ASML (calculated with the ASML New York share) is compared to the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. This NASDAQ index is designed to track the performance of a set of companies engaged in the design, distribution, manufacture, and sale of semiconductors. There are two versions of this index, a price return index and a total return index, the latter of which is chosen (NASDAQ: X.SOX), since this index reinvests cash dividends, equivalent to the total shareholder return definition described above.
|
•
|
ASML’s rate of return on capital it has put to work, regardless of the capital structure of the company. It is used as a fundamental metric to measure value creation of the company. The ROAIC is calculated by dividing the Net Operating Profit After Tax by the Average Invested Capital.
|
Performance ASML vs PHLX Index
(total shareholder return ASML -/- total shareholder return X.SOX) |
Pay-out as a % of target
|
|
|
|
|
≥ 20%
|
200
|
%
|
Between 0% and 20%
|
Linear between 100% and 200%
|
|
Between -20% and 0%
|
Linear between 50% and 100%
|
|
< -20%
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Board of
Management |
Financial
Year |
|
Fixed
|
Total fixed
|
% Fixed
|
Short-term (variable)
|
|
Long-term (variable)
|
|
Total variable
|
|
% Variable
|
|
Total Remuneration
|
|
Relative proportion (ratio between fixed % and variable %)
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Base salary
|
|
Pension
|
|
Other benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
STI (cash)
|
|
LTI (share awards)1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
|||||
P.T.F.M. Wennink
|
2019
|
2,3
|
1,000
|
|
207
|
|
53
|
|
1,260
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
1,070
|
|
2,031
|
|
3,101
|
|
71.1
|
%
|
4,361
|
|
0.41
|
2018 (restated)
|
4,5
|
978
|
|
203
|
|
53
|
|
1,234
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
747
|
|
1,452
|
|
2,199
|
|
64.1
|
%
|
3,433
|
|
0.56
|
|
2017 (restated)
|
5,6
|
978
|
|
170
|
|
51
|
|
1,199
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
869
|
|
1,387
|
|
2,256
|
|
65.3
|
%
|
3,455
|
|
0.53
|
|
M.A. van den Brink
|
2019
|
2,3
|
1,000
|
|
207
|
|
52
|
|
1,259
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
1,070
|
|
2,031
|
|
3,101
|
|
71.1
|
%
|
4,360
|
|
0.41
|
2018 (restated)
|
4,5
|
978
|
|
203
|
|
51
|
|
1,232
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
747
|
|
1,452
|
|
2,199
|
|
64.1
|
%
|
3,431
|
|
0.56
|
|
2017 (restated)
|
5,6
|
978
|
|
170
|
|
50
|
|
1,198
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
869
|
|
1,387
|
|
2,256
|
|
65.3
|
%
|
3,454
|
|
0.53
|
|
F.J. van Hout
|
2019
|
2,3
|
680
|
|
114
|
|
44
|
|
838
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
728
|
|
1,172
|
|
1,900
|
|
69.4
|
%
|
2,738
|
|
0.44
|
2018 (restated)
|
4,5
|
661
|
|
114
|
|
44
|
|
819
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
505
|
|
853
|
|
1,358
|
|
62.4
|
%
|
2,177
|
|
0.60
|
|
2017 (restated)
|
5,6
|
661
|
|
114
|
|
43
|
|
818
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
587
|
|
871
|
|
1,458
|
|
64.1
|
%
|
2,276
|
|
0.56
|
|
F.J.M.
Schneider- Maunoury |
2019
|
2,3
|
680
|
|
114
|
|
30
|
|
824
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
728
|
|
1,172
|
|
1,900
|
|
69.7
|
%
|
2,724
|
|
0.43
|
2018 (restated)
|
4,5
|
661
|
|
114
|
|
31
|
|
806
|
|
37.2
|
%
|
505
|
|
858
|
|
1,363
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
2,169
|
|
0.59
|
|
2017 (restated)
|
5,6
|
661
|
|
114
|
|
32
|
|
807
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
587
|
|
866
|
|
1,453
|
|
64.3
|
%
|
2,260
|
|
0.56
|
|
R.J.M. Dassen 7
|
2019
|
|
680
|
|
93
|
|
47
|
|
820
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
728
|
|
1,408
|
|
2,136
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
2,956
|
|
0.38
|
2018 (restated)
|
5
|
386
|
|
53
|
|
28
|
|
467
|
|
52.0
|
%
|
295
|
|
135
|
|
430
|
|
47.9
|
%
|
897
|
|
1.09
|
|
C.D. Fouquet 7
|
2019
|
|
680
|
|
74
|
|
47
|
|
801
|
|
36.4
|
%
|
728
|
|
674
|
|
1,402
|
|
63.6
|
%
|
2,203
|
|
0.57
|
2018 (restated)
|
5
|
496
|
|
45
|
|
32
|
|
573
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
379
|
|
173
|
|
552
|
|
49.1
|
%
|
1,125
|
|
1.04
|
|
Total Board of Management
|
2019
|
|
4,720
|
|
809
|
|
273
|
|
5,802
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
5,052
|
|
8,487
|
|
13,539
|
|
70.0
|
%
|
19,341
|
|
0.43
|
2018
|
|
4,160
|
|
732
|
|
239
|
|
5,131
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
3,178
|
|
4,923
|
|
8,101
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
13,232
|
|
0.63
|
|
2017
|
|
3,278
|
|
568
|
|
176
|
|
4,022
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
2,912
|
|
4,511
|
|
7,423
|
|
64.9
|
%
|
11,445
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The remuneration reported as part of the LTI (share awards) is based on costs incurred under US GAAP and EU-IFRS. The costs of share awards are charged to the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the 3-year vesting period based on the number of awards expected to vest. For the first 2 years, we apply the maximum achievable number of share awards, and in the final performance year of the awards we update this estimate for the non-market performance conditions. Therefore the costs for the financial year 2019 include costs of the Board of Management performance share plan 2019 (at maximum vesting), 2018 (at maximum vesting) and 2017 (at revised best estimate of the number of shares that will vest). Furthermore, any difference between the amount based on the best estimate of achievable number of shares awards and the amount based on the actual number of share awards that vest, is released to the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the financial year in which the share awards vest.
|
2.
|
The LTI (share awards) remuneration reported for the year 2019 includes an adjustment for the 2016 Board of Management performance share plan based on the actual number of share awards vested in 2019. The adjustment for Mr. Wennink, Mr. van den Brink, Mr. van Hout and Mr. Schneider-Maunoury amounts to €(346,501), €(346,501), €(234,185) and €(234,185) respectively. The remuneration committee awarded the Board of Management a payout of 75% of maximum compared to the result of 65% of maximum for vesting of the 2016 award. This resulted in an incremental fair value step-up for the LTI (share awards) for the year 2019 of €0.6 million. The adjustment for Mr. Wennink, Mr. van den Brink, Mr. van Hout and Mr. Schneider-Maunoury amounts to €168,774, €168,774, €114,067 and €114,067 respectively. The net impact is respectively €(177,727), €(177,727), €(120,118) and €(120,118).
|
3.
|
The LTI (share awards) remuneration reported for the year 2019 includes an adjustment for the 2017 Board of Management performance share plan based on a best estimate of the number of share awards, which are expected to vest in 2020. The adjustment for Mr. Wennink, Mr. van den Brink, Mr. van Hout and Mr. Schneider-Maunoury amounts to €(943,898), €(943,898), €(542.241) and €(542.241) respectively. Additionally a modification has been taken into account for a non-market element. This resulted in an incremental fair value step-up for the LTI (share awards) for the year 2019 of €4.2 million. The adjustment for Mr. Wennink, Mr. van den Brink, Mr. van Hout and Mr. Schneider-Maunoury amounts to €1,337,544, €1,337,544, €768,379 and €768,379 respectively. The net impact is respectively €393,646, €393,646, €226,138 and €226,138.
|
4.
|
The LTI (share awards) remuneration reported for the year 2018 includes an adjustment for the Board of Management performance share plan 2015 based on the actual number of share awards vested in 2018. The adjustment for Mr. Wennink, Mr. van den Brink, Mr. van Hout and Mr. Schneider-Maunoury amounts to €(394,434), €(394,434), €(264,593) and €(257,605) respectively.
|
5.
|
The LTI (share awards) for 2018 and 2017 have been restated refer to the details of the restatement to the section Restatement remuneration Board of Management below.
|
6.
|
The LTI (share awards) remuneration reported the for the year 2017 includes an adjustment for the Board of Management performance share plan 2014 based on the actual number of share awards vested in 2017. The adjustment for Mr. Wennink, Mr. van den Brink, Mr. van Hout and Mr. Schneider-Maunoury amounts to €(271,533), €(271,533), €(182,095) and €(177,459) respectively.
|
7.
|
As per the 2018 AGM Roger Dassen and Christophe Fouquet were appointed as members of the Board of Management. Roger Dassen replaced Wolfgang Nickl who stepped down from his position with ASML as per the 2018 AGM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Former Board of
Management |
Financial
Year |
|
Fixed
|
Total fixed
|
% Fixed
|
Short-term (variable)
|
|
Long-term (variable)
|
|
Total variable
|
|
% Variable
|
|
Total Remuneration
|
|
Relative proportion (ratio between fixed % and variable %)
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Base salary
|
|
Pension
|
|
Other benefits
|
|
|
|
STI (cash)
|
|
LTI (share awards)1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
|||||
W.U. Nickl 5
|
2018 (restated)
|
2,3
|
220
|
|
25
|
|
19
|
|
264
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
168
|
|
1,020
|
|
1,188
|
|
81.8
|
%
|
1,452
|
|
0.22
|
2017 (restated)
|
3,4
|
661
|
|
67
|
|
47
|
|
775
|
|
43.5
|
%
|
587
|
|
419
|
|
1,006
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
1,781
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The remuneration reported as part of the LTI (share awards) is based on costs incurred under US GAAP and EU-IFRS. The costs of share awards are charged to the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the 3-year vesting period based on the number of awards expected to vest. For the first 2 years, we apply the maximum achievable number of share awards, and in the final performance year of the awards we update this estimate for the non-market performance conditions. Therefore the costs for the financial year 2019 include costs of the Board of Management performance share plan 2019 (at maximum vesting), 2018 (at maximum vesting) and 2017 (at revised best estimate of the number of shares that will vest). Furthermore, any difference between the amount based on the best estimate of achievable number of shares awards and the amount based on the actual number of share awards that vest, is released to the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the financial year in which the share awards vest.
|
2.
|
The LTI (share awards) remuneration reported for the year 2018 includes an adjustment for the Board of Management performance share plan 2015 based on the actual number of share awards vested in 2018. The adjustment for Mr. Nickl amounts to €(253,072).
|
3.
|
The LTI (share awards) for 2018 and 2017 have been restated refer to the details of the restatement to the section Restatement remuneration Board of Management below.
|
4.
|
The remuneration reported as part of the LTI (share awards) for the year 2017 includes an adjustment for the Board of Management performance share plan 2014 based on the actual number of share awards vested in 2017. The adjustment for Mr. Nickl amounts to €(963,017).
|
5.
|
As per the 2018 AGM Roger Dassen and Christophe Fouquet were appointed as members of the Board of Management. Roger Dassen replaced Wolfgang Nickl who stepped down from his position with ASML as per the 2018 AGM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Board of
Management |
Financial Year
|
Original reported LTI-share awards
|
|
Accounting for market based elements
|
|
Absence accounting incremental fair value step-up for modification 2015 award upon vesting
|
|
Restated LTI-share awards
|
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
P.T.F.M. Wennink
|
2018
|
1,560
|
|
(174
|
)
|
66
|
|
1,452
|
|
2017
|
1,471
|
|
(84
|
)
|
—
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
M.A. van den Brink
|
2018
|
1,560
|
|
(174
|
)
|
66
|
|
1,452
|
|
2017
|
1,471
|
|
(84
|
)
|
—
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
F.J. van Hout
|
2018
|
908
|
|
(100
|
)
|
45
|
|
853
|
|
2017
|
919
|
|
(48
|
)
|
—
|
|
871
|
|
|
F.J.M.
Schneider- Maunoury |
2018
|
914
|
|
(100
|
)
|
44
|
|
858
|
|
2017
|
914
|
|
(48
|
)
|
—
|
|
866
|
|
|
R.J.M. Dassen
|
2018
|
149
|
|
(14
|
)
|
—
|
|
135
|
|
C.D. Fouquet
|
2018
|
191
|
|
(18
|
)
|
—
|
|
173
|
|
Total Board of Management
|
2018
|
5,282
|
|
(580
|
)
|
221
|
|
4,923
|
|
2017
|
4,775
|
|
(264
|
)
|
—
|
|
4,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Former Board of
Management |
Financial Year
|
Original reported LTI-share awards
|
|
Accounting for market based elements
|
|
Absence accounting incremental fair value step-up for modification 2015 award upon vesting
|
|
Timing acceleration
|
|
Restated LTI-share awards
|
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
W.U. Nickl
|
2018
|
970
|
|
(117
|
)
|
42
|
|
125
|
|
1,020
|
|
2017
|
650
|
|
(100
|
)
|
—
|
|
(131
|
)
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Net sales
|
6,287,375
|
|
6,875,073
|
|
8,962,658
|
|
10,944,016
|
|
11,820,001
|
|
Net income based on US GAAP
|
1,387,174
|
|
1,557,850
|
|
2,066,679
|
|
2,591,614
|
|
2,592,252
|
|
Net income based on IFRS
|
1,619,489
|
|
1,642,800
|
|
2,173,400
|
|
2,525,515
|
|
2,581,107
|
|
ASML share price (closing price on Euronext Amsterdam in €)
|
82.6
|
|
106.7
|
|
145.2
|
|
137.2
|
|
263.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Remuneration President (CEO)
|
3,558
|
|
3,458
|
|
3,455
|
|
3,433
|
|
4,361
|
|
Remuneration President (CTO)
|
3,603
|
|
3,462
|
|
3,454
|
|
3,431
|
|
4,360
|
|
Remuneration Executive Vice President (CFO)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
897
|
|
2,956
|
|
Remuneration Executive Vice President (CSO)
|
2,530
|
|
2,360
|
|
2,276
|
|
2,177
|
|
2,738
|
|
Remuneration Executive Vice President EUV
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,125
|
|
2,203
|
|
Remuneration Executive Vice President (COO)
|
2,450
|
|
2,301
|
|
2,260
|
|
2,169
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Average remuneration per FTE
|
110
|
|
110
|
|
109
|
|
107
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Internal pay ratio (CEO versus employee remuneration)
|
32
|
|
31
|
|
32
|
|
32
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Financial year
|
|
Supervisory Board
|
|
Audit committee
|
|
Remuneration committee
|
|
Selection and nomination committee
|
|
Technology committee
|
|
Other
|
|
Total fixed
|
|
% Fixed
|
|
Total variable
|
|
% Variable
|
|
Total remuneration
|
|
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
||
G.J. Kleisterlee
|
2019
|
1
|
108
|
|
15
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
152
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
152
|
|
2018
|
1
|
100
|
|
13
|
|
—
|
|
15
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
138
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
138
|
|
|
2017
|
1
|
99
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
135
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
135
|
|
|
2016
|
1,5
|
86
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
113
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
113
|
|
|
2015
|
6
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6
|
|
—
|
|
66
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
66
|
|
|
D.A. Grose
|
2019
|
3
|
83
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
17
|
|
20
|
|
132
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
132
|
|
2018
|
|
90
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
15
|
|
—
|
|
115
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
115
|
|
|
2017
|
4
|
88
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
14
|
|
1
|
|
113
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
113
|
|
|
2016
|
4
|
80
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
12
|
|
5
|
|
105
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
105
|
|
|
2015
|
4
|
80
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
12
|
|
4
|
|
104
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
104
|
|
|
T.L. Kelly
|
2019
|
3
|
73
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
15
|
|
100
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
100
|
|
2018
|
2
|
53
|
|
—
|
|
7
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
60
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
60
|
|
|
2017
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
|
2016
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
|
2015
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
|
A.P. Aris
|
2019
|
3
|
68
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
12
|
|
5
|
|
97
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
97
|
|
2018
|
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
7
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
80
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
80
|
|
|
2017
|
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
80
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
80
|
|
|
2016
|
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
76
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
76
|
|
|
2015
|
6
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
6
|
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
—
|
|
70
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
70
|
|
|
R.D. Schwalb
|
2019
|
|
68
|
|
15
|
|
17
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
100
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
100
|
|
2018
|
|
60
|
|
13
|
|
15
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
88
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
88
|
|
|
2017
|
|
60
|
|
12
|
|
14
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
86
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
86
|
|
|
2016
|
|
60
|
|
10
|
|
11
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
81
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
81
|
|
|
2015
|
6
|
60
|
|
10
|
|
6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
76
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
76
|
|
|
C.M.S. Smits Nusteling
|
2019
|
|
68
|
|
22
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
90
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
90
|
|
2018
|
|
60
|
|
20
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
80
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
80
|
|
|
2017
|
|
60
|
|
19
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
79
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
79
|
|
|
2016
|
|
60
|
|
15
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
75
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
75
|
|
|
2015
|
|
60
|
|
14
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
74
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
74
|
|
|
J.M.C. Stork
|
2019
|
3
|
73
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
20
|
|
117
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
117
|
|
2018
|
|
80
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
100
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
100
|
|
|
2017
|
|
80
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
100
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
100
|
|
|
2016
|
|
80
|
|
—
|
|
6
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
94
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
94
|
|
|
2015
|
|
80
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
88
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
88
|
|
|
W.H. Ziebart
|
2019
|
3
|
68
|
|
15
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
5
|
|
100
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
100
|
|
2018
|
|
60
|
|
9
|
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
82
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
82
|
|
|
2017
|
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
80
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
80
|
|
|
2016
|
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
77
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
77
|
|
|
2015
|
|
60
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
80
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
80
|
|
|
Total
|
2019
|
|
609
|
|
67
|
|
41
|
|
41
|
|
65
|
|
65
|
|
888
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
888
|
|
2018
|
|
563
|
|
55
|
|
38
|
|
32
|
|
55
|
|
—
|
|
743
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
743
|
|
|
2017
|
|
507
|
|
43
|
|
44
|
|
24
|
|
54
|
|
1
|
|
673
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
673
|
|
|
2016
|
|
486
|
|
35
|
|
34
|
|
17
|
|
44
|
|
5
|
|
621
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
621
|
|
|
2015
|
|
460
|
|
24
|
|
24
|
|
8
|
|
38
|
|
4
|
|
558
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
During 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016 Gerard J. Kleisterlee was invited as a guest to the Audit Committee and received an observer fee.
|
2.
|
During 2018 Terri L. Kelly succeeded Pauline F.M. van der Meer Mohr as a member of the Supervisory Board.
|
3.
|
Other mainly consists of the extra allowance for intercontinental meetings.
|
4.
|
In 2017, 2016 and 2015 the Vice Chairman of the Supervisory Board received respectively €1,250, €5,000 and €3,750 in addition to the annual fixed fee.
|
5.
|
After the first quarter for 2016 Gerard J. Kleisterlee replaced Arthur P.M. van der Poel for the role of Chairman of the Supervisory Board.
|
6.
|
During 2015 Antoinette (Annet) P. Aris, Gerard J. Kleisterlee and Rolf-Dieter Schwalb were appointed as member of the Supervisory Board and therefore received an observer fee in the first quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Financial year
|
|
Supervisory Board
|
|
Audit committee
|
|
Remuneration committee
|
|
Selection and nomination committee
|
|
Technology committee
|
|
Other
|
|
Total fixed
|
|
% Fixed
|
|
Total variable
|
|
% Variable
|
|
Total remuneration
|
|
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
||
P.F.M. van der Meer Mohr
|
2019
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
|
2018
|
1
|
20
|
|
4
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
27
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
27
|
|
|
2017
|
|
60
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
82
|
|
100
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
During 2018 Terri L. Kelly succeeded Pauline F.M. van der Meer Mohr as a member of the Supervisory Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Board of
Management |
Grant date
|
|
Full
control |
Number of shares: market based1
|
|
Fair value at grant date5
|
|
Number of shares: non-market based1
|
|
Fair value at grant date5
|
|
Total target number of shares at grant date
|
|
Total maximum number of shares at grant date
|
|
Vesting date
|
Total number of shares at
vesting date2 |
|
Share price at vesting
|
|
End of lock-up date
|
Status
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
P.T.F.M.
Wennink |
7/19/19
|
Conditional
|
No
|
2,217
|
|
245.4
|
|
5,173
|
|
194.4
|
|
7,390
|
|
14,780
|
|
1/1/22
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/24
|
1/19/18 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,958
|
|
215.1
|
|
4,570
|
|
162.8
|
|
6,528
|
|
13,056
|
|
1/19/21
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/19/23
|
|
1/20/17 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
3,037
|
|
145.4
|
|
7,085
|
|
110.5
|
|
10,122
|
|
20,243
|
|
1/1/20
|
16,733
|
|
263.7
|
|
1/1/22
|
|
1/22/16
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,290
|
|
83.6
|
|
8,290
|
|
16,579
|
|
1/22/19
|
12,435
|
|
141.4
|
|
1/22/21
|
|
1/23/15
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,355
|
|
94.4
|
|
8,355
|
|
16,710
|
|
1/23/18
|
12,533
|
|
167.0
|
|
1/23/20
|
|
1/24/14
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,640
|
|
64.4
|
|
9,640
|
|
19,280
|
|
1/24/17
|
15,063
|
|
113.9
|
|
1/24/19
|
|
M.A. van
den Brink |
7/19/19
|
Conditional
|
No
|
2,217
|
|
245.4
|
|
5,173
|
|
194.4
|
|
7,390
|
|
14,780
|
|
1/1/22
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/24
|
1/19/18 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,958
|
|
215.1
|
|
4,570
|
|
162.8
|
|
6,528
|
|
13,056
|
|
1/19/21
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/19/23
|
|
1/20/17 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
3,037
|
|
145.4
|
|
7,085
|
|
110.5
|
|
10,122
|
|
20,243
|
|
1/1/20
|
16,733
|
|
263.7
|
|
1/1/22
|
|
1/22/16
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,290
|
|
83.6
|
|
8,290
|
|
16,579
|
|
1/22/19
|
12,435
|
|
141.4
|
|
1/22/21
|
|
1/23/15
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,355
|
|
94.4
|
|
8,355
|
|
16,710
|
|
1/23/18
|
12,533
|
|
167.0
|
|
1/23/20
|
|
1/24/14
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,640
|
|
64.4
|
|
9,640
|
|
19,280
|
|
1/24/17
|
15,063
|
|
113.9
|
|
1/24/19
|
|
F.J. van Hout
|
7/19/19
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,371
|
|
245.4
|
|
3,198
|
|
194.4
|
|
4,569
|
|
9,137
|
|
1/1/22
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/24
|
1/19/18 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,125
|
|
215.1
|
|
2,626
|
|
162.8
|
|
3,751
|
|
7,501
|
|
1/19/21
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/19/23
|
|
1/20/17 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,745
|
|
145.4
|
|
4,070
|
|
110.5
|
|
5,815
|
|
11,629
|
|
1/1/20
|
9,613
|
|
263.7
|
|
1/1/22
|
|
1/22/16
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,603
|
|
83.6
|
|
5,603
|
|
11,205
|
|
1/22/19
|
8,404
|
|
141.4
|
|
1/22/21
|
|
1/23/15
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,605
|
|
94.4
|
|
5,605
|
|
11,210
|
|
1/23/18
|
8,408
|
|
167.0
|
|
1/23/20
|
|
1/24/14
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,465
|
|
64.4
|
|
6,465
|
|
12,929
|
|
1/24/17
|
10,101
|
|
113.9
|
|
1/24/19
|
|
F.J.M.
Schneider- Maunoury |
7/19/19
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,371
|
|
245.4
|
|
3,198
|
|
194.4
|
|
4,569
|
|
9,137
|
|
1/1/22
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/24
|
1/19/18 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,125
|
|
215.1
|
|
2,626
|
|
162.8
|
|
3,751
|
|
7,502
|
|
1/19/21
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/19/23
|
|
1/20/17 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,745
|
|
145.4
|
|
4,070
|
|
110.5
|
|
5,815
|
|
11,629
|
|
1/1/20
|
9,613
|
|
263.7
|
|
1/1/22
|
|
1/22/16
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,603
|
|
83.6
|
|
5,603
|
|
11,205
|
|
1/22/19
|
8,404
|
|
141.4
|
|
1/22/21
|
|
1/23/15
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,456
|
|
94.4
|
|
5,456
|
|
10,912
|
|
1/23/18
|
8,184
|
|
167.0
|
|
1/23/20
|
|
1/24/14
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,300
|
|
64.4
|
|
6,300
|
|
12,599
|
|
1/24/17
|
9,843
|
|
113.9
|
|
1/24/19
|
|
R.J.M.
Dassen 3,4
|
7/19/19
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,371
|
|
245.4
|
|
3,198
|
|
194.4
|
|
4,569
|
|
9,137
|
|
1/1/22
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/24
|
1/25/19
|
Conditional
|
No
|
3,000
|
|
169.0
|
|
7,000
|
|
148.3
|
|
10,000
|
|
20,000
|
|
1/1/22
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/24
|
|
1/19/18 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
657
|
|
274.6
|
|
1,531
|
|
185.0
|
|
2,188
|
|
4,376
|
|
1/19/21
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/19/23
|
|
C.D. Fouquet 3
|
07/19/19
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,371
|
|
245.4
|
|
3,198
|
|
194.4
|
|
4,569
|
|
9,137
|
|
1/1/22
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/24
|
1/19/18 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
844
|
|
274.6
|
|
1,969
|
|
185.0
|
|
2,813
|
|
5,626
|
|
1/19/21
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/19/23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
As of 2017, a market-based element (Total Shareholder Return compared to a reference index) was incorporated in the performance plans. The fair value per award has been calculated for the market (30%) and non-market (70%) elements separately as required under US GAAP and EU-IFRS. As from 2019, we state the number of performance shares at grant date at target level. Prior to 2019, the number of shares were stated at maximum vesting (200% of target).
|
2.
|
The number of shares represent the gross compensation, before any tax payments using shares is performed. Vested performance shares may be partially sold to pay for taxes over the performance shares (‘sell to cover’), which is in accordance with applicable tax regulations and our Remuneration Policy.
|
3.
|
As per the 2018 AGM Roger Dassen and Christophe Fouquet were appointed as members of the Board of Management. Roger Dassen replaced Wolfgang Nickl who stepped down from his position with ASML as per the 2018 AGM.
|
4.
|
An additional performance share award was awarded to Roger Dassen for a target amount of 10,000 shares on January 25, 2019. The vesting and performance conditions are in line with other Board of Management performance plans.
|
5.
|
The restatement refers to the fair value of shares granted, as determined for accounting purposes. It has no impact on the number of performance shares granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Former Board of
Management |
Grant date
|
|
Full
control |
Number of shares: market based1
|
|
Fair value at grant date5
|
|
Number of shares: non-market based1
|
|
Fair value at grant date5
|
|
Total target number of shares at grant date
|
|
Total maximum number of shares at grant date
|
|
Vesting date
|
Total number of shares at
vesting date2 |
|
Share price at vesting
|
|
End of lock-up date
|
Status
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
W.U. Nickl 3, 4
|
1/19/18 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
375
|
|
215.1
|
|
875.5
|
|
162.8
|
|
1,250.5
|
|
2,501
|
|
1/19/21
|
—
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/19/23
|
1/20/17 (restated)
|
Conditional
|
No
|
1,745
|
|
145.4
|
|
4,070
|
|
110.5
|
|
5,815
|
|
11,629
|
|
1/1/20
|
9,613
|
|
n/a
|
|
1/1/22
|
|
1/22/16
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,603
|
|
83.6
|
|
5,603
|
|
11,205
|
|
1/22/19
|
8,404
|
|
263.7
|
|
1/22/21
|
|
1/23/15
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,360
|
|
94.4
|
|
5,360
|
|
10,720
|
|
1/23/18
|
8,040
|
|
141.4
|
|
1/23/20
|
|
1/24/14
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,187
|
|
64.4
|
|
6,187
|
|
12,373
|
|
1/24/17
|
9,669
|
|
167.0
|
|
1/24/19
|
|
1/24/14
|
Unconditional
|
No
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
28,000
|
|
64.4
|
|
28,000
|
|
56,000
|
|
1/24/17
|
43,748
|
|
113.9
|
|
1/24/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
As of 2017, a market-based element (Total Shareholder Return compared to a reference index) was incorporated in the performance plans. The fair value per award has been calculated for the market (30%) and non-market (70%) elements separately as required under US GAAP and EU-IFRS. As from 2019, we state the number of performance shares at grant date at target level. Prior to 2019, the number of shares were stated at maximum vesting (200% of target).
|
2.
|
The number of shares represent the gross compensation, before any tax payments using shares is performed. Vested performance shares may be partially sold to pay for taxes over the performance shares (‘sell to cover’), which is in accordance with applicable tax regulations and our Remuneration Policy.
|
3.
|
ASML compensated part of the shares and stock options that were forfeited when Mr. Nickl left his former company in the US. This compensation takes the form of a maximum of 56,000 performance related shares awarded in 2014, subject to the performance conditions, a three year vesting period and a two year holding period as applicable under the Remuneration Policy.
|
4.
|
As per the 2018 AGM Roger Dassen and Christophe Fouquet were appointed as members of the Board of Management. Roger Dassen replaced Wolfgang Nickl who stepped down from his position with ASML as per the 2018 AGM.
|
5.
|
The restatement refers to the fair value of shares granted, as determined for accounting purposes. It has no impact on the number of performance shares granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
EUR-denominated
|
USD-denominated
|
||||||
|
Number
of shares |
|
Weighted
average fair value at grant date (€) |
|
Number
of shares |
|
Weighted
average fair value at grant date (USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Conditional shares outstanding at January 1, 2017
|
884,204
|
|
79.33
|
|
954,608
|
|
95.81
|
|
Granted
|
342,120
|
|
125.16
|
|
326,804
|
|
130.77
|
|
Vested
|
(388,127
|
)
|
81.13
|
|
(387,779
|
)
|
99.35
|
|
Forfeited
|
(56,107
|
)
|
70.76
|
|
(57,079
|
)
|
98.97
|
|
Conditional shares outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
782,090
|
|
99.10
|
|
836,554
|
|
107.61
|
|
Granted
|
288,679
|
|
161.63
|
|
348,997
|
|
187.98
|
|
Vested
|
(293,075
|
)
|
108.10
|
|
(315,333
|
)
|
113.96
|
|
Forfeited
|
(56,867
|
)
|
96.98
|
|
(209,036
|
)
|
108.33
|
|
Conditional shares outstanding at December 31, 2018
|
720,827
|
|
120.73
|
|
661,182
|
|
146.78
|
|
Granted
|
315,578
|
|
190.33
|
|
255,885
|
|
206.90
|
|
Vested
|
(304,322
|
)
|
116.82
|
|
(282,971
|
)
|
138.04
|
|
Forfeited
|
(50,054
|
)
|
96.74
|
|
(55,597
|
)
|
138.43
|
|
Conditional shares outstanding at December 31, 2019
|
682,029
|
|
157.48
|
|
578,499
|
|
179.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
EUR-denominated
|
USD-denominated
|
||||||
|
Number
of shares |
|
Weighted
average fair value at grant date (€) |
|
Number
of shares |
|
Weighted
average fair value at grant date (USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Outstanding, January 1, 2017
|
323,604
|
|
36.61
|
|
165,597
|
|
58.18
|
|
Exercisable, January 1, 2017
|
323,604
|
|
36.61
|
|
165,597
|
|
58.18
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
(115,606
|
)
|
25.11
|
|
(46,938
|
)
|
47.11
|
|
Forfeited
|
(399
|
)
|
55.11
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2017
|
207,599
|
|
42.67
|
|
118,659
|
|
62.85
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2017
|
207,599
|
|
42.67
|
|
118,659
|
|
62.85
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
(90,710
|
)
|
19.86
|
|
(46,208
|
)
|
36.65
|
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
(197
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
—
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2018
|
116,692
|
|
60.41
|
|
70,299
|
|
81.43
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2018
|
116,692
|
|
60.49
|
|
70,299
|
|
81.43
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
(27,952
|
)
|
46.90
|
|
(14,750
|
)
|
72.86
|
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
|
88,740
|
|
64.80
|
|
55,549
|
|
83.71
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2019
|
88,740
|
|
64.80
|
|
55,549
|
|
83.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EUR-denominated
|
USD-denominated
|
||||||
Range of
exercise prices (€) |
Number of outstanding options at December 31, 2019
|
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life of outstanding options (years) |
Range of
exercise prices (USD) |
Number of outstanding options at December 31, 2019
|
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life of outstanding options (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
20 - 25
|
7,260
|
|
0.79
|
20 - 25
|
—
|
|
0.00
|
25 - 40
|
8,060
|
|
1.72
|
25 - 40
|
6,518
|
|
1.10
|
40 - 50
|
9,290
|
|
2.80
|
40 - 50
|
562
|
|
1.80
|
50 - 60
|
7,273
|
|
3.97
|
50 - 60
|
2,869
|
|
2.70
|
60 - 70
|
15,318
|
|
3.93
|
60 - 70
|
423
|
|
3.10
|
70 - 80
|
14,115
|
|
5.38
|
70 - 80
|
1,059
|
|
3.30
|
80 - 90
|
13,625
|
|
5.85
|
80 - 90
|
12,449
|
|
4.80
|
90 - 100
|
13,799
|
|
5.69
|
90 - 100
|
21,957
|
|
5.00
|
100 - 110
|
—
|
|
0.00
|
100 - 110
|
9,712
|
|
5.70
|
Total
|
88,740
|
|
4.16
|
Total
|
55,549
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
ASML’s operational and financial objectives.
|
•
|
The strategy designed to achieve the objectives.
|
•
|
The parameters to be applied in relation to the strategy designed to achieve the objectives.
|
•
|
Corporate responsibility issues that are relevant to ASML.
|
•
|
The achievement of ASML’s objectives.
|
•
|
ASML’s corporate strategy and the management of risks inherent to ASML’s business activities.
|
•
|
The structure and operation of internal risk management and control systems.
|
•
|
The financial reporting process.
|
•
|
ASML’s culture and the activities of the Board of Management in that regard.
|
•
|
Compliance with applicable legislation and regulations.
|
•
|
The relationship with shareholders and other stakeholders.
|
•
|
The corporate social responsibility issues important for ASML.
|
•
|
A narrative explanation of ASML’s financial statements.
|
•
|
The context within which financial information should be analyzed.
|
•
|
Information about the quality, and variability, of our earnings and cash flow.
|
•
|
We respect people and planet.
|
•
|
We operate with integrity.
|
•
|
We preserve our assets.
|
•
|
We manage professionally.
|
•
|
We encourage Speak Up.
|
•
|
700,000,000 Cumulative Preference Shares with a nominal value of €0.09 each.
|
•
|
699,999,000 Ordinary Shares with a nominal value of €0.09 each.
|
•
|
9,000 Ordinary Shares B with a nominal value of €0.01 each.
|
1.
|
As reported to the AFM on July 1, 2019, Capital Research & Management Company reports 575,680,545 voting rights corresponding to 63,964,505 shares (based on 9 votes per share) of our ordinary shares but do not have ownership rights related to those shares. Capital World Investors reported on a Schedule 13-G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019, that it is the beneficial owner of 35,735,396 shares of our ordinary shares as a result of its affiliation with Capital Research & Management Company. In addition, the Growth Fund of America reported to the AFM on May 15, 2014 that it owns 3.08% of our outstanding shares. We believe that some or all of these shares are included within the shares reported to be owned by Capital Research and Management Company, as set forth above.
|
2.
|
Based solely on the Schedule 13-G/A filed by BlackRock Inc. with the SEC on February 4, 2019; BlackRock reports voting power with respect to 24,798,886 of these shares. A public filing with the AFM on July 1, 2019 shows an aggregate indirect capital interest of 5.15% and voting rights of 6.39%, based on the total number of outstanding shares and voting rights at that time.
|
3.
|
A public filing with the AFM on October 1, 2019 shows Baillie Gifford & Co have 147,694,140 voting rights, corresponding to 18,262,995 shares (based on 9 votes per share), but no ownership rights related to those shares.
|
4.
|
Does not include unvested shares granted to members of the Board of Management. For further information see Leadership and governance - Remuneration report.
|
5.
|
No shares are owned by members of the Supervisory Board.
|
6.
|
As a percentage of the total number of ordinary shares issued and outstanding (419,810,706) as of December 31, 2019, which excludes 5,848,998 ordinary shares which have been issued but are held in treasury by ASML. Please note that share ownership percentages reported to the AFM are expressed as a percentage of the total number of ordinary shares issued (including treasury stock) and that accordingly, percentages reflected in this table may differ from percentages reported to the AFM.
|
•
|
ASML does not follow NASDAQ’s quorum requirements applicable to meetings of ordinary shareholders. In accordance with Dutch law and generally accepted Dutch business practice, ASML’s Articles of Association provide that there are no quorum requirements generally applicable to general meetings of shareholders.
|
•
|
ASML does not follow NASDAQ’s requirements regarding the solicitation of proxies and the provision of proxy statements for general meetings of shareholders. ASML does furnish proxy statements and solicit proxies for the General Meeting. Dutch corporate law sets a mandatory (participation and voting) record date for Dutch listed companies at the 28th day prior to the date of the General Meeting. Shareholders registered at such record date are entitled to attend and exercise their rights as shareholders at the General Meeting, regardless of sale of shares after the record date.
|
•
|
ASML does not follow NASDAQ’s requirement regarding distribution to shareholders of copies of an annual report containing audited Financial Statements prior to our AGM. The distribution of our Integrated Reports to shareholders is not required under Dutch corporate law or Dutch securities laws, or by Euronext Amsterdam. Furthermore, it is generally accepted business practice for Dutch companies not to distribute annual reports. In part, this is because the Dutch system of bearer shares has made it impractical to keep a current list of holders of the bearer shares in order to distribute the annual reports. Instead, we make our Integrated Report available at our corporate head office in the Netherlands (and at the offices of our Dutch listing agent as stated in the convening notice for the meeting) no later than 42 days prior to convocation of the AGM. In addition, we post a copy of our Integrated Reports on our Website prior to the AGM.
|
•
|
ASML does not follow NASDAQ’s requirement to obtain shareholder approval of stock option or purchase plans or other equity compensation arrangements available to officers, directors or employees. It is not required under Dutch law or generally accepted practice for Dutch companies to obtain shareholder approval of equity compensation arrangements available to officers, directors or employees. The AGM adopts the Remuneration Policy for the Board of Management, approves equity compensation arrangements for the Board of Management and approves the remuneration for the Supervisory Board. The Remuneration Committee evaluates the achievements of individual members of the Board of Management with respect to the short and long-term quantitative performance, the full Supervisory Board evaluates the quantitative performance criteria. Equity compensation arrangements for employees are adopted by the Board of Management within limits approved by the AGM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Notes
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3
|
Net system sales
|
6,424.4
|
|
8,259.1
|
|
8,996.2
|
|
|
Net service and field option sales
|
2,538.3
|
|
2,684.9
|
|
2,823.8
|
|
3
|
Total net sales
|
8,962.7
|
|
10,944.0
|
|
11,820.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cost of system sales
|
(3,439.9
|
)
|
(4,141.2
|
)
|
(4,676.2
|
)
|
|
Cost of service and field option sales
|
(1,502.6
|
)
|
(1,773.6
|
)
|
(1,864.0
|
)
|
|
Total cost of sales 1
|
(4,942.5
|
)
|
(5,914.8
|
)
|
(6,540.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
4,020.2
|
|
5,029.2
|
|
5,279.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Other income
|
95.8
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Research and development costs
|
(1,259.7
|
)
|
(1,575.9
|
)
|
(1,968.5
|
)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative costs
|
(416.6
|
)
|
(488.0
|
)
|
(520.5
|
)
|
|
Income from operations
|
2,439.7
|
|
2,965.3
|
|
2,790.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Interest and other, net
|
(50.3
|
)
|
(28.3
|
)
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
2,389.4
|
|
2,937.0
|
|
2,765.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
20
|
Provision for income taxes
|
(306.0
|
)
|
(351.6
|
)
|
(191.7
|
)
|
|
Income after income taxes
|
2,083.4
|
|
2,585.4
|
|
2,574.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
9
|
Profit (loss) related to equity method investments
|
(16.7
|
)
|
6.2
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
2,066.7
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
Basic net income per ordinary share
|
4.81
|
|
6.10
|
|
6.16
|
|
22
|
Diluted net income per ordinary share
|
4.79
|
|
6.08
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
Number of ordinary shares used in computing per share amounts
|
|
|
|
|
||
22
|
Basic
|
429.8
|
|
424.9
|
|
420.8
|
|
22
|
Diluted
|
431.6
|
|
426.4
|
|
421.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Cost of sales includes amounts with related parties of €1,321.8 million, €1,173.7 million and €918.4 million in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Notes
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
2,066.7
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Proportionate share of other comprehensive income from equity method investments
|
(1.0
|
)
|
(4.8
|
)
|
(19.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Foreign currency translation, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency translation and effective portion of hedges on net investments
|
(329.0
|
)
|
18.2
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
Financial instruments, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|||
24
|
Gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments
|
(16.6
|
)
|
8.3
|
|
3.2
|
|
24
|
Transfers to net income
|
(3.1
|
)
|
11.8
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
(349.7
|
)
|
33.5
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
1,717.0
|
|
2,625.1
|
|
2,585.1
|
|
|
Attributable to equity holders
|
1,717.0
|
|
2,625.1
|
|
2,585.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Notes
|
(in millions, except share and per share data)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
||
4
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3,121.1
|
|
3,532.3
|
|
4
|
Short-term investments
|
913.3
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
5
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
1,498.2
|
|
1,786.8
|
|
6
|
Finance receivables, net
|
611.1
|
|
564.5
|
|
20
|
Current tax assets
|
79.7
|
|
178.7
|
|
2
|
Contract assets
|
95.9
|
|
231.0
|
|
7
|
Inventories, net
|
3,439.5
|
|
3,809.2
|
|
8
|
Other assets 1
|
772.6
|
|
842.8
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
10,531.4
|
|
12,131.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Finance receivables, net
|
275.1
|
|
421.1
|
|
20
|
Deferred tax assets
|
236.3
|
|
445.3
|
|
8
|
Other assets 2
|
806.1
|
|
830.4
|
|
9
|
Equity method investments
|
915.8
|
|
833.0
|
|
10
|
Goodwill
|
4,541.1
|
|
4,541.1
|
|
11
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
1,104.0
|
|
1,104.4
|
|
12
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
1,589.5
|
|
1,999.3
|
|
13
|
Right-of-use assets - Operating
|
137.6
|
|
205.4
|
|
13
|
Right-of-use assets - Finance 3
|
—
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
9,605.5
|
|
10,498.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
20,136.9
|
|
22,629.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
||
|
Accounts payable 4
|
964.0
|
|
1,062.2
|
|
14
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
911.4
|
|
1,039.9
|
|
20
|
Current tax liabilities
|
187.9
|
|
65.6
|
|
2
|
Contract liabilities
|
1,728.6
|
|
2,526.4
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
3,791.9
|
|
4,694.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Long-term debt
|
3,026.5
|
|
3,108.3
|
|
20
|
Deferred and other tax liabilities
|
251.2
|
|
234.4
|
|
2
|
Contract liabilities
|
1,224.6
|
|
1,759.6
|
|
14
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
201.7
|
|
241.0
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
4,704.0
|
|
5,343.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
8,495.9
|
|
10,037.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares; €0.09 nominal value;
|
|
|
||
|
699,999,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2019;
|
|
|
||
|
419,810,706 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019;
|
|
|
||
|
699,999,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2018;
|
|
|
||
|
421,097,729 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018;
|
|
|
||
|
Issued and outstanding shares
|
38.6
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
Share premium
|
3,741.3
|
|
3,772.0
|
|
|
Treasury shares at cost
|
(1,621.8
|
)
|
(1,019.6
|
)
|
|
Retained earnings
|
9,197.9
|
|
9,523.8
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
285.0
|
|
277.8
|
|
21
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
11,641.0
|
|
12,592.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
20,136.9
|
|
22,629.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Other assets - current includes amounts with related parties of €215.2 million and €231.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
2.
|
Other assets - non-current includes amounts with related parties of €585.3 million and €533.4 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
3.
|
Right-of-use assets - Finance includes amounts with related parties of €107.6 million and €0.0 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
4.
|
Accounts Payable includes amounts with related parties of €127.4 million and €60.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Issued and Outstanding Shares
|
Share Premium
|
|
Treasury Shares at Cost
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Accumulated OCI1
|
|
Total
|
|
|||
|
|
Number
|
|
Amount
|
|
||||||||||
Notes
|
(in millions)
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
429.9
|
|
39.4
|
|
3,693.5
|
|
(796.2
|
)
|
6,434.5
|
|
601.2
|
|
9,972.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,066.7
|
|
—
|
|
2,066.7
|
|
|
Proportionate share of OCI from equity method investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
Foreign currency translation and effective portion of hedges on net investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(329.0
|
)
|
(329.0
|
)
|
24
|
Loss on financial instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(19.7
|
)
|
(19.7
|
)
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,066.7
|
|
(349.7
|
)
|
1,717.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Fair value differences
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
28.6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
21
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
(3.5
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(500.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(500.0
|
)
|
21
|
Cancellation of treasury shares
|
—
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
650.0
|
|
(649.3
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
Share-based payments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
53.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
1.0
|
|
0.1
|
|
(42.7
|
)
|
88.3
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
22.0
|
|
21
|
Dividend paid
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(516.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
(516.7
|
)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
427.4
|
|
38.8
|
|
3,732.5
|
|
(557.9
|
)
|
7,311.5
|
|
251.5
|
|
10,776.4
|
|
|
Opening balance adjustment 2
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(85.3
|
)
|
—
|
|
(85.3
|
)
|
|
Opening balance January 1, 2018
|
427.4
|
|
38.8
|
|
3,732.5
|
|
(557.9
|
)
|
7,226.2
|
|
251.5
|
|
10,691.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
—
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
|
Proportionate share of OCI from equity method investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
Foreign currency translation and effective portion of hedges on net investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
18.2
|
|
18.2
|
|
24
|
Gain on financial instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20.1
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
33.5
|
|
2,625.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
21
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
(7.0
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,145.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,146.2
|
)
|
17
|
Share-based payments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
46.3
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
0.7
|
|
0.1
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
82.0
|
|
(22.8
|
)
|
—
|
|
21.8
|
|
21
|
Dividend paid
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(597.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
(597.1
|
)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
421.1
|
|
38.6
|
|
3,741.3
|
|
(1,621.8
|
)
|
9,197.9
|
|
285.0
|
|
11,641.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
—
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
|
Proportionate share of OCI from equity method investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(19.8
|
)
|
(19.8
|
)
|
|
Foreign currency translation and effective portion of hedges on net investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20.1
|
|
20.1
|
|
24
|
Loss on financial instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
2,585.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
21
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
(1.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(410.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(410.0
|
)
|
21
|
Cancellation of treasury shares
|
—
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
—
|
|
902.3
|
|
(901.8
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
Share-based payments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
74.6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
0.6
|
|
0.1
|
|
(43.9
|
)
|
109.9
|
|
(38.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
27.2
|
|
21
|
Dividend paid
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,325.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,325.7
|
)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
419.8
|
|
38.2
|
|
3,772.0
|
|
(1,019.6
|
)
|
9,523.8
|
|
277.8
|
|
12,592.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
As of December 31, 2019, accumulated OCI consists of €(25.6) million loss relating to our proportionate share of other comprehensive income from equity method investments (2018: €(5.8) million loss; 2017: one million loss), €302.4 million relating to foreign currency translation gain (2018: €282.3 million gain; 2017: €264.1 million gain) and €1.0 million relating to unrealized gains on financial instruments (2018: €8.5 million gains; 2017: €(11.6) million losses).
|
2.
|
As of January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2016-16 Income Taxes (ASC 740) 'Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory', with the impact adjusted to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net income
|
2,066.7
|
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
11, 12, 15
|
Depreciation and amortization 1
|
417.5
|
|
|
422.7
|
|
|
448.5
|
|
|
|
10, 11, 12
|
Impairment
|
9.0
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
12
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
2.8
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
17
|
Share-based payments
|
53.1
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
7
|
Inventory reserves
|
120.1
|
|
|
218.2
|
|
|
221.5
|
|
|
|
20
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
(238.5
|
)
|
|
(236.8
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
Equity method investments 2
|
36.4
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
5
|
Accounts receivable
|
(1,128.6
|
)
|
|
212.4
|
|
|
(255.0
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
Finance receivables
|
237.0
|
|
|
(664.9
|
)
|
|
(95.3
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
Inventories
|
(284.1
|
)
|
|
(515.7
|
)
|
|
(404.7
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
Other assets
|
(169.4
|
)
|
|
(404.0
|
)
|
|
(199.1
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
90.9
|
|
|
237.7
|
|
|
82.1
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
266.6
|
|
|
97.9
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
Current tax assets and liabilities
|
(151.8
|
)
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
(202.6
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
Contract assets and liabilities
|
260.5
|
|
|
975.3
|
|
|
1,198.3
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
1,818.3
|
|
|
3,072.7
|
|
|
3,276.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
12
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment 3
|
(338.9
|
)
|
|
(574.0
|
)
|
4
|
|
(766.6
|
)
|
|
11
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|
(119.3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
(1,129.3
|
)
|
|
(918.1
|
)
|
|
(1,291.5
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
Maturity of short-term investments
|
1,250.0
|
|
|
1,034.1
|
|
|
1,019.0
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from (used for) derivative financial instruments
|
27.0
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Loans issued and other investments
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment on loans
|
1.6
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
9
|
Acquisition of equity method investments
|
(1,019.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(1,229.0
|
)
|
|
(491.5
|
)
|
|
(1,157.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
21
|
Dividend paid
|
(516.7
|
)
|
|
(597.1
|
)
|
|
(1,325.7
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
(500.0
|
)
|
|
(1,146.2
|
)
|
|
(410.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of shares
|
50.6
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
15
|
Repayment of debt
|
(243.0
|
)
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(1,209.1
|
)
|
|
(1,724.3
|
)
|
|
(1,712.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows
|
(619.8
|
)
|
|
856.9
|
|
|
406.6
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash
|
(28.1
|
)
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(647.9
|
)
|
|
862.1
|
|
|
411.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
|
2,906.9
|
|
|
2,259.0
|
|
|
3,121.1
|
|
|
|
4
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
|
2,259.0
|
|
|
3,121.1
|
|
|
3,532.3
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Interest paid
|
(91.4
|
)
|
|
(61.0
|
)
|
|
(59.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
(475.0
|
)
|
|
(554.4
|
)
|
|
(678.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation of property, plant and equipment, amortization of intangible assets, and amortization of underwriting commissions and discount related to the bonds and credit facility.
|
2.
|
Equity method investments includes the profit (loss) related to equity method investments, dividends received from equity method investments and capitalization of R&D and supply chain support funding. The dividend received is a cash inflow in 2019 of €99.9 million (2018: €89.2 million, 2017: €19.7 million).
|
3.
|
In 2019, an amount of €184.1 million (2018: €191.6 million, 2017: €36.5 million) of the purchase of property, plant and equipment relates to funding provided for tooling to our equity method investment, which is initially recognized as part of the other assets.
|
4.
|
In 2018, an amount of €54.7 million of land and buildings was reclassified to other assets.
|
•
|
Revenue recognition, including lease accounting
|
•
|
Inventory reserves
|
•
|
Uncertain tax positions in income taxes
|
•
|
Contingencies and litigation
|
•
|
Evaluation of long-lived assets for impairment
|
|
|
Goods or services
|
Nature, timing of satisfying the performance obligations, and significant payment terms
|
|
|
New systems (established technologies)
|
New systems sales include i-line, KrF, ArF, ArFi and EUV related systems, along with the related factory options ordered with the base system, as well as metrology and inspection systems. Prior to shipment, the majority of our systems undergo a Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) in our cleanroom facilities, effectively replicating the operating conditions that will be present on the customer’s site, in order to verify whether the system meets its standard specifications and any additional technical and performance criteria agreed with the customer. A system is shipped only after all contractual specifications are met or discrepancies from agreed upon specifications are waived and customer signoff is received for delivery. Each system’s performance is re-tested through a Site Acceptance Test (SAT) after installation at the customer site. We have never failed to successfully complete installation of a system at a customer’s premises; therefore, acceptance at FAT is considered to be proven for established technologies with a history of successful customer acceptances at SAT (equal or better than FAT).
|
Transfer of control of a system undergoing FAT, and recognition of revenue related to this system, will occur upon delivery of the system, depending on the Incoterms.
|
|
Transfer of control of a system not undergoing a FAT, and recognition of revenue related to this system, will occur upon customer acceptance of the system at SAT.
|
|
|
|
Used systems
|
We have no repurchase commitments in our general sales terms and conditions, however from time to time we repurchase systems that we have manufactured and sold and, following refurbishment, will resell to other customers. This repurchase decision is mainly driven by market demand expressed by other customers and less frequently by explicit or implicit contractual arrangements relating to the initial sale. We consider reasonable offers from any vendor, including customers, to repurchase used systems that we can refurbish, resell, and install as part of our normal business operations.
|
Transfer of control of the sale of the repurchased and refurbished systems, and related revenue recognition, will occur either upon delivery of the system to the carrier or upon arrival of the system to the customer’s loading dock, depending on the Incoterms and if a FAT was performed prior to shipment. If no FAT was performed, then transfer of control will be upon customer acceptance at SAT. If a FAT was performed, then transfer of control will be upon customer acceptance at FAT, refer to "New systems (established technologies)".
|
|
|
|
Field upgrades and options (system enhancements)
|
Field upgrades and options mainly relate to goods and services that are delivered for systems already installed in the customer factories. Certain upgrades require significant installation efforts, enhancing an asset the customer controls, therefore resulting in transfer of control over the period of installation, measured using the cost incurred method which is estimated using labor hours, as this best depicts the satisfaction of our obligation in transferring control. The options and other upgrades that do not require significant installation effort transfer control upon delivery, depending on the Incoterms.
|
As long as we are not able to make a reliable estimate of the total efforts needed to complete the upgrade, we only recognize revenue to cover costs incurred. Margin will be realized at the earlier of us being able to make a reliable estimate or completion of the upgrade.
|
|
|
|
New product introduction
|
New product introductions are typically newly developed options to be used within our systems. Transfer of control and revenue recognition for new product introductions occurs upon customer acceptance (generally at SAT). Once there is an established history of successful installation and customer acceptance, revenue will be recognized consistent with other systems and goods after transfer of control.
|
|
|
Installation
|
Installation is provided within the selling price of a system. Installation is considered to be distinct as it does not significantly modify the system being purchased and the customer or a third party could be capable of performing the installation themselves if desired. Transfer of control takes place over the period of installation from delivery through SAT, measured on a straight-line basis, as our performance is satisfied evenly over this period of time.
|
As long as we are not able to make a reliable estimate of the total efforts needed to complete the installation, we only recognize revenue to cover costs incurred. Margin will be realized at the earlier of us being able to make a reliable estimate or installation completion.
|
|
|
|
Warranties
|
We provide standard warranty coverage on our systems for 12 months and on certain optic parts for 60 months, providing labor and non-consumable parts necessary to repair our systems during these warranty periods. These standard warranties cannot be purchased and do not provide a service in addition to the general assurance the system will perform as promised. As a result, no revenue is allocated to these standard warranties.
|
Both the extended and enhanced (optic) warranties on our systems are accounted for as a separate performance obligation, with transfer of control taking place over the warranty period, measured on a straight-line basis, as this is a stand-ready obligation.
|
|
|
|
Time-based licenses and related service
|
Time-based licenses relate to software licenses and the related service which are sold for a period of time. The licenses and the related service are not considered to be individually distinct and the transfer of control takes place over the license term, measured on a straight-line basis, as our performance is satisfied evenly over this period of time. Payments are made in installments throughout the license term.
|
|
|
|
|
Goods or services
|
Nature, timing of satisfying the performance obligations, and significant payment terms
|
Application projects
|
Application projects are node transition and consulting projects which at times may be provided as free service within a volume purchase agreement. Measuring satisfaction of this performance obligation is performed through an input method based on the labor hours expended relative to the estimated total labor hours as this best depicts the transfer of control of these kind of services.
|
As long as we are not able to make a reliable estimate of the total efforts needed to complete these kind of projects, we only recognize revenue to cover costs incurred. Margin will be realized at the earlier of us being able to make a reliable estimate or project completion.
|
|
|
|
Service contracts
|
Service contracts are entered into with our customers to support our systems used in their ongoing operations during the systems lifecycle, typically in the form of full-service agreements, limited manpower agreements, other labor agreements, parts availability or parts usage agreements. These services are typically for a specified period of time. Control transfers over this period of time, measured on a straight-line basis, as these are stand-ready obligations, with an exception for the labor hour pool service contracts for which we recognize revenue in line with invoicing, using the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-55-18. Invoicing is typically performed monthly or quarterly throughout the service period, typically payable within 15-45 days.
|
|
|
Billable parts and labor
|
Billable labor represents maintenance services to our systems installed in the customer’s factories while in operation, through purchase orders from our customer. Control over these services is transferred to the customer upon receipt of customer sign-off.
|
Billable parts represent spare parts including optical components relating to our systems installed in the customer’s factories while in operation, through purchase orders from our customer.
|
|
Billable parts can be:
|
|
•
Sold as direct spare parts, for which control transfers upon the relevant Incoterms; or
|
|
•
Sold as part of maintenance services, for which control transfers upon receipt of customer sign-off.
|
|
|
|
Field projects (relocations)
|
Field projects represent mainly relocation services. Measuring satisfaction of this performance obligation is performed through an input method based on the labor hours expended relative to the estimated total labor hours as this best depicts the transfer of control of our service.
|
|
|
OnPulse Maintenance
|
OnPulse maintenance services are provided over a specified period of time on our light source systems. Payment is determined by the amount of pulses counted from each light source system, which is variable. Invoicing is monthly based on the pulses counted. Revenue is recognized in line with invoicing using the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-55-18.
|
|
|
•
|
The lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term;
|
•
|
The lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset, that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise;
|
•
|
The lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset. However, if the commencement date falls at or near the end of the economic life of the underlying asset, this criterion shall not be used for purposes of classifying the lease;
|
•
|
The present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset; or
|
•
|
The underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term.
|
|
|
|
||
Year ended December 31
|
Net system sales
in units |
|
Net system sales
in € millions |
|
|
|
|
||
2019
|
|
|
||
EUV
|
26
|
|
2,799.7
|
|
ArFi
|
82
|
|
4,707.7
|
|
ArF dry
|
22
|
|
401.2
|
|
KrF
|
65
|
|
679.7
|
|
i-line
|
34
|
|
133.5
|
|
Metrology & Inspection
|
115
|
|
274.4
|
|
Total
|
344
|
|
8,996.2
|
|
|
|
|
||
2018
|
|
|
||
EUV
|
18
|
|
1,880.1
|
|
ArFi
|
86
|
|
4,806.9
|
|
ArF dry
|
16
|
|
274.3
|
|
KrF
|
78
|
|
860.1
|
|
i-line
|
26
|
|
98.6
|
|
Metrology & Inspection
|
114
|
|
339.1
|
|
Total
|
338
|
|
8,259.1
|
|
|
|
|
||
2017
|
|
|
||
EUV
|
11
|
|
1,084.2
|
|
ArFi
|
76
|
|
4,028.7
|
|
ArF dry
|
13
|
|
186.4
|
|
KrF
|
71
|
|
743.5
|
|
i-line
|
26
|
|
99.7
|
|
Metrology & Inspection
|
95
|
|
281.9
|
|
Total
|
292
|
|
6,424.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Year ended December 31
|
Net system sales
in units |
|
Net system sales
in € millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
Logic
|
238
|
|
6,565.3
|
|
Memory
|
106
|
|
2,430.9
|
|
Total
|
344
|
|
8,996.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
Logic
|
125
|
|
3,713.7
|
|
Memory
|
213
|
|
4,545.4
|
|
Total
|
338
|
|
8,259.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
Logic
|
145
|
|
3,456.7
|
|
Memory
|
147
|
|
2,967.7
|
|
Total
|
292
|
|
6,424.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Year ended December 31
|
2018
|
2019
|
||||||
(in millions)
|
€
|
€
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Contract Assets
|
|
Contract Liabilities
|
|
Contract Assets
|
|
Contract Liabilities
|
|
Balance at beginning of the year
|
270.4
|
|
2,152.0
|
|
95.9
|
|
2,953.2
|
|
Transferred to receivables from contract assets from the beginning of the period
|
(456.2
|
)
|
—
|
|
(167.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
Revenues recognized during the year, to be invoiced
|
192.3
|
|
—
|
|
68.7
|
|
—
|
|
Revenue recognition that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period
|
—
|
|
(1,306.3
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,528.4
|
)
|
Changes as a result of cumulative catch-up adjustments arising from changes in estimates
|
—
|
|
(64.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
(133.4
|
)
|
Remaining performance obligations for which considerations have been received
|
—
|
|
2,082.5
|
|
—
|
|
2,760.8
|
|
Transfer between contract assets and liabilities
|
89.4
|
|
89.4
|
|
233.8
|
|
233.8
|
|
Total
|
95.9
|
|
2,953.2
|
|
231.0
|
|
4,286.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The remaining performance obligations as of December 31, 2018 have been increased by €1.5 billion to reflect commitments not included in our 2018 Consolidated Financial Statements. The adjustment does not have an impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
New systems
|
6,332.9
|
|
8,115.6
|
|
8,807.1
|
|
Used systems
|
91.5
|
|
143.5
|
|
189.1
|
|
Net system sales
|
6,424.4
|
|
8,259.1
|
|
8,996.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Deposits with financial institutions
|
188.2
|
|
434.8
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
2,342.6
|
|
2,139.7
|
|
Interest-bearing bank accounts
|
590.3
|
|
957.8
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3,121.1
|
|
3,532.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with financial institutions
|
913.3
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
Short-term investments
|
913.3
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, gross
|
1,504.9
|
|
1,791.9
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
(6.7
|
)
|
(5.1
|
)
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
1,498.2
|
|
1,786.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
Finance receivables, gross
|
893.7
|
|
994.4
|
|
Unearned interest
|
(7.5
|
)
|
(8.8
|
)
|
Finance receivables, net
|
886.2
|
|
985.6
|
|
Current portion of finance receivables, gross
|
613.3
|
|
568.4
|
|
Current portion of unearned interest
|
(2.2
|
)
|
(3.9
|
)
|
Non-current portion of finance receivables, net
|
275.1
|
|
421.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
568.4
|
|
2021
|
257.7
|
|
2022
|
168.3
|
|
2023
|
—
|
|
2024
|
—
|
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
Finance receivables, gross
|
994.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials 1
|
1,550.3
|
|
2,026.3
|
|
Work-in-process
|
1,537.5
|
|
1,505.9
|
|
Finished products 1
|
793.0
|
|
771.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, gross
|
3,880.8
|
|
4,303.5
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
(441.3
|
)
|
(494.3
|
)
|
Inventories, net
|
3,439.5
|
|
3,809.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
In 2019, the presentation of service parts needing to be reworked has been adjusted from Finished products to Raw materials as they are not able to be used in sale of goods or services in their current state. As a result, we have reclassified €312.0 million from Finished products to Raw materials for the previously reported December 31, 2018 balances. The reclassification does not have an impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
|
|
|
|
||
Year ended December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at beginning of year
|
(349.9
|
)
|
(441.3
|
)
|
Additions for the year
|
(218.2
|
)
|
(221.5
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
4.2
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Utilization of the reserve
|
122.6
|
|
169.0
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
(441.3
|
)
|
(494.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance payments to Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
|
231.1
|
|
215.2
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
299.6
|
|
372.5
|
|
Derivative financial instruments 1
|
42.2
|
|
34.5
|
|
VAT
|
116.0
|
|
89.5
|
|
Other assets
|
83.7
|
|
131.1
|
|
Other current assets
|
772.6
|
|
842.8
|
|
|
|
|
||
Advance payments to Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH
|
533.4
|
|
585.3
|
|
Derivative financial instruments 1
|
59.7
|
|
103.0
|
|
Compensation plan assets
|
43.1
|
|
55.1
|
|
Non-current accounts receivable
|
150.7
|
|
67.8
|
|
Other assets
|
19.2
|
|
19.2
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
806.1
|
|
830.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
For further details on derivative financial instruments see Note 24 Financial risk management.
|
•
|
Profit of €82.8 million (2018: €80.9 million) related to our share of Carl Zeiss SMT Holding GmbH & Co. KG’s net income after accounting policy alignment
|
•
|
Cost due to basis difference amortization related to intangible assets of €26.7 million (2018: €26.7 million)
|
•
|
Cost due to intercompany profit elimination of €13.7 million (2018: €10.7 million)
|
•
|
Cost due to dividend forfeiture of €24.2 million (2018: €0.0 million)
|
•
|
Cost due to inventory step-up release of €0.0 million (2018: €37.3 million)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As of December 31
|
2019
|
|
2019
|
|
Maximum exposure to loss
|
|
(in millions)
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|||
EUV Agreements
|
320.9
|
|
—
|
|
320.9
|
|
DUV Agreements
|
34.7
|
|
—
|
|
34.7
|
|
High-NA Agreement
|
566.5
|
|
(28.0
|
)
|
566.5
|
|
Investment agreement for 24.9% equity
|
833.0
|
|
—
|
|
833.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
For the year ended
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Capital expenditures
|
89.1
|
|
191.8
|
|
184.1
|
|
R&D costs
|
55.8
|
|
74.8
|
|
94.2
|
|
Supply chain investments
|
2.6
|
|
8.5
|
|
4.5
|
|
Total support provided
|
147.5
|
|
275.1
|
|
282.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
Estimated useful life
|
Brands
|
20 years
|
Intellectual property
|
3 - 10 years
|
Developed technology
|
6 - 15 years
|
Customer relationships
|
8 - 18 years
|
Other
|
2 - 6 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Brands
€ |
|
Intellectual
property € |
|
Developed
technology € |
|
Customer
relationships € |
|
Other
€ |
|
Total
€ |
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at January 1, 2018
|
38.2
|
|
61.9
|
|
1,199.9
|
|
228.6
|
|
32.2
|
|
1,560.8
|
|
Additions
|
—
|
|
5.0
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
37.0
|
|
42.0
|
|
Disposals
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
1.0
|
|
2.0
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
39.2
|
|
68.9
|
|
1,199.9
|
|
228.6
|
|
66.2
|
|
1,602.8
|
|
Additions
|
—
|
|
73.7
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
42.1
|
|
115.8
|
|
Disposals
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
(0.3
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
2.4
|
|
2.1
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
38.9
|
|
142.4
|
|
1,200.1
|
|
228.6
|
|
110.5
|
|
1,720.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at January 1, 2018
|
4.8
|
|
60.0
|
|
264.2
|
|
57.8
|
|
8.0
|
|
394.8
|
|
Amortization
|
1.9
|
|
1.2
|
|
82.1
|
|
12.7
|
|
5.8
|
|
103.7
|
|
Disposals
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
0.7
|
|
1.6
|
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
0.3
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
7.4
|
|
62.8
|
|
346.5
|
|
70.5
|
|
11.6
|
|
498.8
|
|
Amortization
|
1.9
|
|
7.8
|
|
82.0
|
|
12.7
|
|
11.0
|
|
115.4
|
|
Disposals
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
(0.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
2.1
|
|
2.1
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
9.2
|
|
70.6
|
|
428.6
|
|
83.2
|
|
24.5
|
|
616.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Carrying amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
December 31, 2018
|
31.8
|
|
6.1
|
|
853.4
|
|
158.1
|
|
54.6
|
|
1,104.0
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
29.7
|
|
71.8
|
|
771.5
|
|
145.4
|
|
86.0
|
|
1,104.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
2020
|
120.0
|
|
2021
|
120.0
|
|
2022
|
117.0
|
|
2023
|
109.0
|
|
2024
|
102.0
|
|
Thereafter
|
536.4
|
|
Amortization expenses
|
1,104.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
Estimated useful life
|
|
|
Buildings and constructions
|
5 - 45 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
1 - 7 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
1 - 10 years
|
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment
|
3 - 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
(in millions)
|
Land and
buildings
€
|
|
Machinery
and
equipment
€
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
€
|
|
Furniture,
fixtures and
other
equipment
€
|
|
Total
€
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at January 1, 2018
|
1,641.8
|
|
1,159.9
|
|
256.6
|
|
375.6
|
|
3,433.9
|
|
Additions
|
119.6
|
|
196.4
|
|
21.5
|
|
44.6
|
|
382.1
|
|
Disposals
|
(57.2
|
)
|
(16.0
|
)
|
(3.4
|
)
|
(4.9
|
)
|
(81.5
|
)
|
Net non-cash movements to/from Inventories
|
—
|
|
(38.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(38.9
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
5.6
|
|
3.7
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.9
|
|
10.7
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
1,709.8
|
|
1,305.1
|
|
275.2
|
|
416.2
|
|
3,706.3
|
|
Additions
|
321.0
|
|
261.1
|
|
26.7
|
|
64.6
|
|
673.4
|
|
Disposals
|
(0.3
|
)
|
(17.5
|
)
|
(1.4
|
)
|
(103.4
|
)
|
(122.6
|
)
|
Net non-cash movements to/from Inventories
|
—
|
|
33.9
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
33.9
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
6.0
|
|
5.2
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.3
|
|
12.0
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
2,036.5
|
|
1,587.8
|
|
301.0
|
|
377.7
|
|
4,303.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accumulated depreciation and impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at January 1, 2018
|
552.7
|
|
742.4
|
|
244.5
|
|
293.5
|
|
1,833.1
|
|
Depreciation
|
92.8
|
|
174.8
|
|
19.2
|
|
28.6
|
|
315.4
|
|
Impairment charges
|
1.0
|
|
14.4
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
15.4
|
|
Disposals
|
(2.5
|
)
|
(13.3
|
)
|
(3.0
|
)
|
(4.5
|
)
|
(23.3
|
)
|
Net non-cash movements to/from Inventories
|
—
|
|
(27.8
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(27.8
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
2.0
|
|
1.5
|
|
0.2
|
|
0.3
|
|
4.0
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
646.0
|
|
892.0
|
|
260.9
|
|
317.9
|
|
2,116.8
|
|
Depreciation
|
98.5
|
|
166.7
|
|
21.3
|
|
38.8
|
|
325.3
|
|
Impairment charges
|
—
|
|
4.7
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.7
|
|
Disposals
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(14.8
|
)
|
(1.2
|
)
|
(103.3
|
)
|
(119.5
|
)
|
Net non-cash movements to/from Inventories
|
—
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
2.0
|
|
2.8
|
|
0.3
|
|
—
|
|
5.1
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
746.3
|
|
1,022.7
|
|
281.3
|
|
253.4
|
|
2,303.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Carrying amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 31, 2018
|
1,063.8
|
|
413.1
|
|
14.3
|
|
98.3
|
|
1,589.5
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
1,290.2
|
|
565.1
|
|
19.7
|
|
124.3
|
|
1,999.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As of December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
195.7
|
|
191.6
|
|
196.1
|
|
R&D Costs
|
101.7
|
|
105.9
|
|
117.2
|
|
SG&A
|
10.8
|
|
17.9
|
|
12.0
|
|
Total Depreciation
|
308.2
|
|
315.4
|
|
325.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Finance
|
||||||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Properties
|
105.1
|
|
177.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
92.1
|
|
Cars
|
11.9
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Equipment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
26.4
|
|
Warehouses
|
14.5
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
6.1
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Right-of-use assets
|
137.6
|
|
205.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Finance
|
||||||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current
|
46.3
|
|
55.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Non-current
|
93.7
|
|
153.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
9.5
|
|
Lease liabilities
|
140.0
|
|
209.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Finance
|
||||||||||
As of December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Properties
|
29.9
|
|
40.2
|
|
48.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2.8
|
|
Cars
|
7.1
|
|
7.4
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Equipment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.5
|
|
Warehouses
|
5.9
|
|
7.1
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
11.6
|
|
12.4
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Depreciation charge right-of-use assets
|
54.5
|
|
67.1
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Finance
|
||||||||||
As of December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Weighted average remaining lease term (months)
|
57
|
|
60
|
|
70
|
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
230
|
|
Weighted average discount rate (%)
|
2.2
|
%
|
2.1
|
%
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs to be paid
|
154.8
|
|
252.1
|
|
Personnel related items
|
544.4
|
|
654.6
|
|
Derivative financial instruments 1
|
47.4
|
|
3.9
|
|
Operating lease liabilities 2
|
140.0
|
|
209.4
|
|
Provisions
|
160.3
|
|
30.7
|
|
Standard warranty reserve
|
59.8
|
|
128.4
|
|
Other
|
6.4
|
|
1.8
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
1,113.1
|
|
1,280.9
|
|
Less: non-current portion of accrued and other liabilities
|
201.7
|
|
241.0
|
|
Current portion of accrued and other liabilities
|
911.4
|
|
1,039.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
For further details on derivative financial instruments see Note 24 Financial risk management.
|
2.
|
For further details on lease liabilities see Note 13 Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
€500 million 0.625% senior notes due 2022, carrying amount
|
494.5
|
|
499.5
|
|
€750 million 3.375% senior notes due 2023, carrying amount
|
816.0
|
|
813.3
|
|
€1,000 million 1.375% senior notes due 2026, carrying amount
|
964.6
|
|
1,007.0
|
|
€750 million 1.625% senior notes due 2027, carrying amount
|
742.4
|
|
778.3
|
|
Other
|
9.0
|
|
10.2
|
|
Long-term debt
|
3,026.5
|
|
3,108.3
|
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
3,026.5
|
|
3,108.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
2020
|
2.8
|
|
2021
|
2.8
|
|
2022
|
502.8
|
|
2023
|
751.3
|
|
2024
|
—
|
|
Thereafter
|
1,750.0
|
|
Long-term debt
|
3,009.7
|
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt
|
2.8
|
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
3,006.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
Amortized cost amount
|
2,980.0
|
|
2,983.2
|
|
Fair value interest rate swaps 1
|
37.5
|
|
114.9
|
|
Carrying amount
|
3,017.5
|
|
3,098.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The fair value of the interest rate swaps excludes accrued interest.
|
|
|
|
||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
||
Principal amount
|
3,000.0
|
|
3,000.0
|
|
Carrying amount
|
3,017.5
|
|
3,098.1
|
|
Fair value 1
|
3,119.4
|
|
3,247.7
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Source: Bloomberg Finance LP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Payments due by period
|
Total
|
|
1 year
|
|
2 year
|
|
3 year
|
|
4 year
|
|
5 year
|
|
After
5 years |
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Long-Term Debt Obligations, including interest expense 1
|
3,303.5
|
|
59.2
|
|
59.0
|
|
556.1
|
|
795.8
|
|
26.3
|
|
1,807.1
|
|
Lease Obligations 2
|
209.4
|
|
53.5
|
|
44.4
|
|
31.7
|
|
19.1
|
|
11.8
|
|
48.9
|
|
Purchase Obligations
|
4,562.7
|
|
3,947.8
|
|
384.6
|
|
149.0
|
|
56.8
|
|
17.5
|
|
7.0
|
|
Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH High NA Funding Commitment 3
|
524.8
|
|
304.3
|
|
214.4
|
|
6.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations 4
|
8,600.4
|
|
4,364.8
|
|
702.4
|
|
742.9
|
|
871.7
|
|
55.6
|
|
1,863.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Long-term debt obligations mainly relate to principal amounts and interest payments of our Eurobonds. For the amounts excluding interest expenses and for further details see Note 15 Long-term debt and interest and other costs.
|
2.
|
For further details see Note 13 Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.
|
3.
|
For further details see Note 9 Equity method investments.
|
4.
|
We have excluded unrecognized tax benefits for an amount of €227.1 million as the amounts that will be settled in cash are not known and the timing of any payments is uncertain.
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share price in € at grant date
|
114.1
|
|
166.9
|
|
199.5
|
|
Expected volatility ASML
|
27.1
|
%
|
26.1
|
%
|
29.8
|
%
|
Expected volatility PHLX index
|
21.6
|
%
|
21.3
|
%
|
24.8
|
%
|
Vesting period
|
2.9 years
|
|
2.9 years
|
|
2.5 years
|
|
Dividend yield
|
1.1
|
%
|
0.8
|
%
|
1.1
|
%
|
Risk free interest rate (Eurozone)
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
Risk free interest rate (US)
|
1.5
|
%
|
2.2
|
%
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions, except weighted average period)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total compensation expenses incurred for share based remuneration (including share-based payments to the BoM)
|
53.1
|
|
46.3
|
|
74.6
|
|
The tax benefit (excluding excess tax benefits) recognized related to the recognized share-based compensation costs in the US
|
8.7
|
|
5.6
|
|
5.9
|
|
Total compensation expenses to be incurred for share based remuneration (including share-based payments to the BoM) in future periods
|
78.5
|
|
94.2
|
|
95.8
|
|
Weighted average period in which compensation expenses (including share-based payments to the BoM) are expected to be recognized
|
1.8 years
|
|
1.7 years
|
|
1.6 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
EUR-denominated
|
USD-denominated
|
||||||
|
Number
of shares |
|
Weighted
average fair value at grant date (€) |
|
Number
of shares |
|
Weighted
average fair value at grant date (USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Conditional shares outstanding at January 1, 2019
|
720,827
|
|
120.73
|
|
661,182
|
|
146.78
|
|
Granted
|
315,578
|
|
190.33
|
|
255,885
|
|
206.90
|
|
Vested
|
(304,322
|
)
|
116.82
|
|
(282,971
|
)
|
138.04
|
|
Forfeited
|
(50,054
|
)
|
96.74
|
|
(55,597
|
)
|
138.43
|
|
Conditional shares outstanding at December 31, 2019
|
682,029
|
|
157.48
|
|
578,499
|
|
179.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
EUR-denominated
|
USD-denominated
|
||||||||||
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Weighted average share price at the exercise date of stock options
|
132.67
|
|
169.68
|
|
201.52
|
|
148.48
|
|
201.01
|
|
225.70
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in millions)
|
12.5
|
|
13.6
|
|
4.3
|
|
4.8
|
|
7.6
|
|
2.3
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of currently exercisable options (in years)
|
3.80
|
|
4.76
|
|
4.16
|
|
4.49
|
|
5.20
|
|
4.40
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable stock options (in millions)
|
21.0
|
|
8.9
|
|
17.7
|
|
13.1
|
|
5.2
|
|
11.8
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding stock options (in millions)
|
21.2
|
|
9.0
|
|
17.7
|
|
13.2
|
|
5.2
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
EUR-denominated
|
USD-denominated
|
||||||
|
Number
of options |
|
Weighted average
exercise price per ordinary share (EUR) |
|
Number
of options |
|
Weighted average
exercise price per ordinary share (USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Outstanding, January 1, 2019
|
116,692
|
|
60.49
|
|
70,299
|
|
81.43
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
(27,952
|
)
|
46.90
|
|
(14,750
|
)
|
72.86
|
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
|
88,740
|
|
64.80
|
|
55,549
|
|
83.71
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2019
|
88,740
|
|
64.80
|
|
55,549
|
|
83.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EUR-denominated
|
USD-denominated
|
||||||
Range of
exercise prices (€) |
Number of outstanding options at December 31, 2019
|
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life of outstanding options (years) |
Range of
exercise prices (USD) |
Number of outstanding options at December 31, 2019
|
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life of outstanding options (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
20 - 25
|
7,260
|
|
0.79
|
20 - 25
|
—
|
|
0.00
|
25 - 40
|
8,060
|
|
1.72
|
25 - 40
|
6,518
|
|
1.10
|
40 - 50
|
9,290
|
|
2.80
|
40 - 50
|
562
|
|
1.80
|
50 - 60
|
7,273
|
|
3.97
|
50 - 60
|
2,869
|
|
2.70
|
60 - 70
|
15,318
|
|
3.93
|
60 - 70
|
423
|
|
3.10
|
70 - 80
|
14,115
|
|
5.38
|
70 - 80
|
1,059
|
|
3.30
|
80 - 90
|
13,625
|
|
5.85
|
80 - 90
|
12,449
|
|
4.80
|
90 - 100
|
13,799
|
|
5.69
|
90 - 100
|
21,957
|
|
5.00
|
100 - 110
|
—
|
|
0.00
|
100 - 110
|
9,712
|
|
5.70
|
Total
|
88,740
|
|
4.16
|
Total
|
55,549
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Includes all members that served on the Board of Management throughout the year.
|
2.
|
Includes all variations of available STI bonus plans of which employees are eligible.
|
•
|
ASML is affiliated to an industry-wide pension fund and uses the pension scheme in common with other participating companies.
|
•
|
Under the regulations of the pension plan, the only obligation these participating companies have towards the pension fund is to pay the annual premium liability. Participating companies are under no obligation whatsoever to pay off any deficits the pension plan may incur. Nor have they any claim to any potential surpluses.
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As of December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in FTE)
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
Customer Support
|
5,051
|
|
5,674
|
|
5,953
|
|
Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management
|
4,909
|
|
5,779
|
|
5,933
|
|
Strategic Supply Management
|
203
|
|
267
|
|
326
|
|
General & Administrative
|
1,517
|
|
1,701
|
|
1,898
|
|
Sales and Mature Products and Services
|
184
|
|
559
|
|
624
|
|
Research & Development
|
7,352
|
|
9,267
|
|
10,166
|
|
Total
|
19,216
|
|
23,247
|
|
24,900
|
|
Less: Temporary employees
|
2,997
|
|
3,203
|
|
1,681
|
|
Payroll employees
|
16,219
|
|
20,044
|
|
23,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Year ended December 31
|
20171
|
|
20181
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Netherlands
|
2,076.6
|
|
2,602.0
|
|
2,441.2
|
|
Foreign
|
312.8
|
|
335.0
|
|
324.6
|
|
Income before taxes
|
2,389.4
|
|
2,937.0
|
|
2,765.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Provision for income taxes current
|
(349.3
|
)
|
(433.5
|
)
|
(305.5
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes deferred
|
61.9
|
|
9.7
|
|
74.8
|
|
Provision for income taxes Netherlands
|
(287.4
|
)
|
(423.8
|
)
|
(230.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Provision for income taxes current
|
(35.3
|
)
|
(210.1
|
)
|
(118.4
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes deferred
|
16.6
|
|
282.3
|
|
157.4
|
|
Provision for income taxes Foreign
|
(18.7
|
)
|
72.2
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total provision for income taxes current
|
(384.5
|
)
|
(643.5
|
)
|
(423.9
|
)
|
Total provision for income taxes deferred
|
78.5
|
|
291.9
|
|
232.2
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
(306.0
|
)
|
(351.6
|
)
|
(191.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
In 2017 and 2018, Provision for income taxes deferred included the tax expense related to changes in the uncertain tax positions, which has been corrected into Provision for income taxes current. The impact is a reclassification for 2018 of €57.0 million from Provision from income taxes deferred to Provision from income taxes current, which is split €50.4 million from Netherlands and €6.6 million from Foreign. The impact is a reclassification for 2017 of €17.5 million from Provision from income taxes deferred to Provision from income taxes current, which includes €6.3 million from Netherlands and €11.2 million from Foreign. The reclassification does not have an impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|||
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
%1
|
|
€
|
|
%1
|
|
€
|
|
%1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Income before income taxes
|
2,389.4
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
2,937.0
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
2,765.8
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Income tax provision based on ASML’s domestic rate
|
(597.4
|
)
|
25.0
|
%
|
(734.3
|
)
|
25.0
|
%
|
(691.4
|
)
|
25.0
|
%
|
Effects of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions
|
21.0
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
15.4
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
5.0
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Adjustments in respect of tax exempt income
|
24.0
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
6.2
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
7.2
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Adjustments in respect of tax incentives
|
263.1
|
|
(11.0
|
)%
|
311.8
|
|
(10.6
|
)%
|
351.0
|
|
(12.7
|
)%
|
Adjustments in respect of prior years’ current taxes
|
(38.3
|
)
|
1.6
|
%
|
(1.2
|
)
|
—
|
%
|
46.7
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
Adjustments in respect of prior years’ deferred taxes
|
40.9
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
3.3
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
9.8
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Movements in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
(17.4
|
)
|
0.7
|
%
|
(57.2
|
)
|
1.9
|
%
|
(16.9
|
)
|
0.6
|
%
|
Tax effects in respect to HMI restructuring
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
115.3
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
89.8
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
(11.9
|
)
|
0.5
|
%
|
(28.5
|
)
|
1.0
|
%
|
7.6
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Equity method investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
(14.5
|
)
|
0.5
|
%
|
(19.7
|
)
|
0.7
|
%
|
Other (credits) and non tax deductible items
|
10.0
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
32.1
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
19.2
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
(306.0
|
)
|
12.8
|
%
|
(351.6
|
)
|
12.0
|
%
|
(191.7
|
)
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
As a percentage of income before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
(208.7
|
)
|
(227.1
|
)
|
Deferred tax position
|
193.8
|
|
438.0
|
|
Deferred and other tax assets (liabilities)
|
(14.9
|
)
|
210.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deferred taxes
|
January 1, 2019
|
|
Other
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of
Operations
|
|
Effect of
changes
in exchange
rates
|
|
Income tax recognized in shareholders’ equity
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Capitalized R&D expenditures
|
1.7
|
|
—
|
|
189.0
|
|
2.2
|
|
—
|
|
192.9
|
|
R&D & other credits
|
70.5
|
|
—
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
1.4
|
|
—
|
|
60.8
|
|
Inventories
|
52.9
|
|
—
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(3.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
49.3
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
150.3
|
|
—
|
|
(92.4
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
56.8
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
40.5
|
|
—
|
|
31.4
|
|
1.5
|
|
—
|
|
73.4
|
|
Installation and warranty reserve
|
13.3
|
|
—
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
0.3
|
|
—
|
|
12.3
|
|
Tax effect carry-forward losses
|
8.5
|
|
—
|
|
3.4
|
|
0.6
|
|
—
|
|
12.5
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
19.4
|
|
—
|
|
9.0
|
|
4.4
|
|
—
|
|
32.8
|
|
Lease liabilities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8.1
|
|
Intangible fixed assets
|
48.7
|
|
—
|
|
81.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
129.8
|
|
Restructuring and impairment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credits
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Share-based payments
|
7.7
|
|
—
|
|
0.6
|
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
8.5
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
21.7
|
|
—
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
(2.1
|
)
|
6.1
|
|
20.3
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, gross
|
435.2
|
|
—
|
|
212.2
|
|
4.0
|
|
6.1
|
|
657.5
|
|
Valuation allowance 1
|
(79.2
|
)
|
—
|
|
7.6
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
(73.6
|
)
|
Total deferred tax assets, net
|
356.0
|
|
—
|
|
219.8
|
|
2.0
|
|
6.1
|
|
583.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Intangible fixed assets
|
(119.8
|
)
|
—
|
|
17.9
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
—
|
|
(104.2
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
Right-of-use assets
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
(25.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
9.8
|
|
0.6
|
|
—
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
(0.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
Borrowing costs long-term debt
|
(1.5
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Other temporary differences
|
(15.1
|
)
|
7.4
|
|
12.4
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
—
|
|
2.9
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(162.2
|
)
|
7.4
|
|
12.4
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
—
|
|
(145.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
193.8
|
|
7.4
|
|
232.2
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
6.1
|
|
438.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Classified as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets – non-current
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
445.3
|
|
||||
Deferred tax liabilities – non-current
|
(42.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
||||
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
193.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
438.0
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The valuation allowance disclosed above relates to R&D credits and Tax effect carry-forward losses that may not be realized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deferred taxes
|
January 1, 2018
|
|
Effects of changes in accounting principles
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of
Operations
|
|
Effect of
changes
in exchange
rates
|
|
Income tax recognized in shareholders’ equity
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Capitalized R&D expenditures
|
3.2
|
|
—
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
1.7
|
|
R&D & other credits
|
44.1
|
|
—
|
|
25.2
|
|
1.2
|
|
—
|
|
70.5
|
|
Inventories
|
46.5
|
|
—
|
|
4.6
|
|
1.8
|
|
—
|
|
52.9
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
21.0
|
|
—
|
|
128.7
|
|
0.6
|
|
—
|
|
150.3
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
42.7
|
|
—
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
2.2
|
|
—
|
|
40.5
|
|
Installation and warranty reserve
|
11.1
|
|
—
|
|
1.6
|
|
0.6
|
|
—
|
|
13.3
|
|
Tax effect carry-forward losses
|
5.7
|
|
—
|
|
2.8
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8.5
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
9.2
|
|
8.2
|
|
1.8
|
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
19.4
|
|
Intangible fixed assets
|
—
|
|
51.7
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
48.7
|
|
Restructuring and impairment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credits
|
4.5
|
|
—
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Share-based payments
|
7.7
|
|
—
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
0.3
|
|
—
|
|
7.7
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
20.1
|
|
2.6
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
0.4
|
|
0.9
|
|
21.7
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, gross
|
215.8
|
|
62.5
|
|
148.6
|
|
7.4
|
|
0.9
|
|
435.2
|
|
Valuation allowance 1
|
(49.5
|
)
|
—
|
|
(28.5
|
)
|
(1.2
|
)
|
—
|
|
(79.2
|
)
|
Total deferred tax assets, net
|
166.3
|
|
62.5
|
|
120.1
|
|
6.2
|
|
0.9
|
|
356.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Intangible fixed assets
|
(265.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
149.7
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
(119.8
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
(37.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
13.3
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
(25.7
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
(13.2
|
)
|
—
|
|
13.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Borrowing costs
|
(1.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Other temporary differences
|
(9.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
(1.6
|
)
|
—
|
|
(15.1
|
)
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(326.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
171.8
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
(162.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
(160.6
|
)
|
62.5
|
|
291.9
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
0.9
|
|
193.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Classified as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets – non-current
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|||
Deferred tax liabilities – non-current
|
(192.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.5
|
)
|
|||
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
(160.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
193.8
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The valuation allowance disclosed above relates to R&D credits and Tax effect carry-forward losses that may not be realized.
|
•
|
700,000,000 Cumulative Preference Shares with a nominal value of €0.09 each.
|
•
|
699,999,000 Ordinary Shares with a nominal value of €0.09 each.
|
•
|
9,000 Ordinary Shares B with a nominal value of €0.01 each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Period
|
Total number of shares purchased
|
|
Average price paid per Share
(€) |
|
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs
|
|
Maximum value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program
(€ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
January 24 - 31, 2019
|
47,400
|
|
151.63
|
|
47,400
|
|
1,346.7
|
|
February 1 - 28, 2019
|
145,001
|
|
160.67
|
|
192,401
|
|
1,323.4
|
|
March 1 - 31, 2019
|
150,956
|
|
163.68
|
|
343,357
|
|
1,298.7
|
|
April 1 - 30, 2019
|
83,791
|
|
176.71
|
|
427,148
|
|
1,283.9
|
|
May 1 - 31, 2019
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
427,148
|
|
1,283.9
|
|
June 1 - 30, 2019
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
427,148
|
|
1,283.9
|
|
July 1 - 31, 2019
|
145,094
|
|
204.60
|
|
572,242
|
|
1,254.2
|
|
August 1 - 31, 2019
|
336,141
|
|
194.30
|
|
908,383
|
|
1,188.9
|
|
September 1 - 30, 2019
|
284,335
|
|
219.26
|
|
1,192,718
|
|
1,126.5
|
|
October 1 - 31, 2019
|
293,486
|
|
230.89
|
|
1,486,204
|
|
1,058.8
|
|
November 1 - 30, 2019
|
274,093
|
|
244.52
|
|
1,760,297
|
|
991.7
|
|
December 1 - 20, 2019
|
188,511
|
|
253.95
|
|
1,948,808
|
|
943.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total
|
1,948,808
|
|
210.38
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Dividing net income by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for that period;
|
•
|
Dividing net income by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for that period plus shares applicable to options and conditional shares
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income
|
2,066.7
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
429.8
|
|
424.9
|
|
420.8
|
|
Basic net income per ordinary share
|
4.81
|
|
6.10
|
|
6.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
429.8
|
|
424.9
|
|
420.8
|
|
Plus shares applicable to
|
|
|
|
|||
Options and conditional shares
|
1.8
|
|
1.5
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Dilutive potential ordinary shares
|
1.8
|
|
1.5
|
|
0.9
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares
|
431.6
|
|
426.4
|
|
421.6
|
|
Diluted net income per ordinary share 1
|
4.79
|
|
6.08
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The calculation of diluted net income per ordinary share assumes the exercise of options issued under our stock option plans and the issuance of shares under our share plans for periods in which exercises or issuances would have a dilutive effect. The calculation of diluted net income per ordinary share does not assume exercise of options when exercise would be anti-dilutive.
|
•
|
Liquidity: Maintain financial stability with a target to keep our Cash & cash equivalents, together with Short-term investments, above a minimum range of €2.0 to €2.5 billion
|
•
|
Capital structure: Maintain a capital structure that targets a solid investment grade credit rating
|
•
|
Cash return: Provide a sustainable dividend per share that will grow over time, paid semi-annually, while returning structural excess cash to shareholders on a regular basis through share buybacks or capital repayment
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
2018
|
2019
|
||||||
(in millions)
|
Impact on net income €
|
|
Impact on equity €
|
|
Impact on net income €
|
|
Impact on equity €
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
US dollar
|
(8.7
|
)
|
28.2
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
30.2
|
|
Japanese yen
|
(1.7
|
)
|
(4.0
|
)
|
4.2
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Taiwanese dollar
|
(6.5
|
)
|
(12.7
|
)
|
(6.2
|
)
|
—
|
|
Other currencies
|
(5.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
Total
|
(22.8
|
)
|
11.5
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
2018
|
2019
|
||||||
(in millions)
|
Impact on net income €
|
|
Impact on equity €
|
|
Impact on net income €
|
|
Impact on equity €
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Effect of a 1.0% point increase in interest rates
|
10.3
|
|
—
|
|
17.2
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
A hedge of an exposure relating to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk (fair value hedge).
|
•
|
A hedge of an exposure relating to the variability in the cash flows of a recognized asset or liability, or of a forecasted transaction, that is attributable to a particular risk (cash flow hedge).
|
•
|
A hedge of the foreign currency exposure relating to a net investment in a foreign operation (net investment hedge).
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
2019
|
||||||
(in millions)
|
Notional
amount € |
|
Fair Value
€ |
|
Notional
amount € |
|
Fair Value
€ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
134.1
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
142.6
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
3,000.0
|
|
56.5
|
|
3,000.0
|
|
134.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As of December 31
|
2018
|
2019
|
||||||
(in millions)
|
Assets
€ |
|
Liabilities
€ |
|
Assets
€ |
|
Liabilities
€ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate swaps — cash flow hedges
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swaps — fair value hedges
|
88.5
|
|
32.0
|
|
134.3
|
|
—
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts — cash flow hedges
|
6.5
|
|
0.9
|
|
2.4
|
|
0.6
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts — net investment hedge
|
—
|
|
2.6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts — no hedge accounting
|
6.9
|
|
11.9
|
|
0.8
|
|
3.3
|
|
Total
|
101.9
|
|
47.4
|
|
137.5
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Less non-current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate swaps — fair value hedges
|
59.7
|
|
32.0
|
|
103.0
|
|
—
|
|
Total non-current portion
|
59.7
|
|
32.0
|
|
103.0
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total current portion
|
42.2
|
|
15.4
|
|
34.5
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Level 1: Valuations based on inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access.
|
•
|
Level 2: Valuations based on inputs other than level 1 inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
•
|
Level 3: Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As of December 31, 2019
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative financial instruments 1
|
—
|
|
137.5
|
|
—
|
|
137.5
|
|
Money market funds 2
|
2,139.7
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,139.7
|
|
Short-term investments 3
|
—
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
—
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
Total
|
2,139.7
|
|
1,323.3
|
|
—
|
|
3,463.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative financial instruments 1
|
—
|
|
3.9
|
|
—
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets and Liabilities for which fair values are disclosed
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Long-term debt 4
|
3,247.7
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,247.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Derivative financial instruments consist of forward foreign exchange contracts and interest rate swaps.
|
2.
|
Money market funds are part of our cash and cash equivalents. See Note 4 Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.
|
3.
|
Short-term investments consist of deposits with original maturities to the entity holding the investments longer than three months, but less than one year at the date of acquisition. See Note 4 Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.
|
4.
|
Long-term debt relates to Eurobonds. See Note 15 Long-term debt and interest and other costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
As of December 31, 2018
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative financial instruments 1
|
—
|
|
101.9
|
|
—
|
|
101.9
|
|
Money market funds 2
|
2,342.6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,342.6
|
|
Short-term investments 3
|
—
|
|
913.3
|
|
—
|
|
913.3
|
|
Total
|
2,342.6
|
|
1,015.2
|
|
—
|
|
3,357.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative financial instruments 1
|
—
|
|
47.4
|
|
—
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets and Liabilities for which fair values are disclosed
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Long-term debt 4
|
3,119.4
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,119.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Derivative financial instruments consist of forward foreign exchange contracts and interest rate swaps.
|
2.
|
Money market funds are part of our cash and cash equivalents. See Note 4 Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.
|
3.
|
Short-term investments consist of deposits with original maturities to the entity holding the investments longer than three months, but less than one year at the date of acquisition. See Note 4 Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.
|
4.
|
Long-term debt relates to Eurobonds. See Note 15 Long-term debt and interest and other costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
89.1
|
|
191.8
|
|
184.1
|
|
R&D costs
|
55.8
|
|
74.8
|
|
94.2
|
|
Supply chain investments
|
2.6
|
|
8.5
|
|
4.5
|
|
Total support provided
|
147.5
|
|
275.1
|
|
282.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Year ended December 31
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total purchases
|
1,141.6
|
|
1,401.0
|
|
1,502.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As of December 31
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Advance payments and High-NA capital expenditure support
|
|
768.1
|
|
814.5
|
|
|
Right-of-use assets - Finance
|
|
—
|
|
107.6
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
60.2
|
|
127.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Performing an analysis of the external environment and obtaining an understanding of relevant social themes and issues, and the characteristics of the organization;
|
•
|
Evaluating the consistent application of the reporting criteria, including the evaluation of the results of the stakeholders' dialogue and the plausibility of estimates made by management and related disclosures in the non-Financial Information;
|
•
|
Obtaining an understanding of the reporting processes for the sustainability information, including obtaining a general understanding of internal controls relevant to our review;
|
•
|
Identifying areas of the sustainability information with a higher risk of misleading or unbalanced information or material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. Designing and performing further assurance procedures aimed at determining the plausibility of the sustainability information responsive to this risk analysis. These procedures included among others:
|
–
|
Interviewing relevant staff at corporate level responsible for the corporate social responsibility strategy and policy;
|
–
|
Interviews with relevant staff responsible for providing the information in the non-financial Information, carrying out internal control procedures on the data and consolidating the data in the non-financial Information;
|
–
|
Obtaining assurance information that the sustainability information reconciles with underlying records of the company;
|
–
|
Reviewing, on a limited test basis, relevant internal and external documentation;
|
–
|
Analytical reviews of the data and trends submitted for consolidation at corporate level.
|
•
|
Evaluating the presentation, structure and content of the sustainability information;
|
•
|
To consider whether the sustainability information as a whole, including the disclosures, reflects the purpose of the reporting criteria used.
|
|
Reported data scope
|
|
Applicable to a subset of the reporting scope (where relevant) or where indicators do not fit the reporting scope
|
Exceptions
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASML world-wide
|
ASML world-wide excluding HMI
|
ASML worldwide excluding Cymer Light Sources & HMI
|
|
ASML main manufacturing locations (Veldhoven, Linkou, Wilton and San Diego)
|
ASML products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and Innovation ecosystem
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Innovation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in R&D partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product safety
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supporting Start-ups and Scale-ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope of indicators is ASML Netherlands only.
|
Customer Intimacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The survey scope is largest and most strategic customers (and industry customers (only for VLSI)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Engagement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The indicator ‘Absenteeism’ is
excluding Cymer and HMI. The scope for ‘Number of scholarships’ is
ASML Netherlands only
The scope for indicator Open positions filled by internal candidates (in %) excludes ASML US.
|
Building a Strong Employer Brand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promoting Diversity and inclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Safety
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor relations and fair remuneration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community involvement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The scope is ASML The Netherlands
for all, except for Time investment of
volunteers (in hours) - Community
Involvement and Total costs of volunteering, which is ASML
worldwide excluding HMI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our supply chain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Supply Chain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responsible Supply Chain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lifetime Extension of Mature Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy efficiency of Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CO2 Emissions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope is all main manufacturing locations, except for Total Ultra-pure water consumption and Total water recycled and reused, which is Veldhoven only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business ethics and compliance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial performance indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope covers all indicators -
Scope contains exceptions for some indicators
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Employee engagement: FTE's in sectors Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management, Customer Support and R&D are in scope for the calculation of the indicator Number of technical training hours per technical FTE. In 2018, the scope was limited to employees within Design & Engineering (D&E) which is part of the R&D sector.
|
•
|
Employee engagement: Cymer and HMI are included in the scope of the following indicators:
|
◦
|
Promotion rate of high performers
|
◦
|
Attrition rate of high performers
|
◦
|
Number of technical training hours per technical FTE
|
◦
|
Number of non-product related training hours per FTE
|
•
|
Fair remuneration: Cymer and HMI are included in the scope of the indicators.
|
•
|
Employee safety: HMI is included in the scope of the indicators.
|
•
|
In 2019, we investigated our waste streams based on the definition of waste from the European Waste directive. Based on this investigation we concluded that some packaging material, which is taken back by one of our suppliers for recycling purposes, needs to be classified as waste generated by ASML. However, this waste stream was not included in the number reported for total waste generated in previous years. Therefore, we restated the number of total waste generated in 2018 as disclosed in this report. Unfortunately, it is not possible to restate the number for 2017, because the necessary information to determine the restatement cannot be delivered anymore by our waste supplier.
|
Our people
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Employee engagement
|
Employee attrition (in FTE)
|
Total ASML
|
Asia
|
Europe
|
US
|
||||||||||||||||
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
||
|
Number of involuntary employee attrition
|
179
|
|
153
|
|
177
|
46
|
|
35
|
|
40
|
70
|
|
69
|
|
80
|
63
|
|
49
|
|
57
|
|
Number of voluntary employee attrition
|
472
|
|
679
|
|
761
|
157
|
|
232
|
|
198
|
112
|
|
176
|
|
257
|
203
|
|
271
|
|
306
|
|
Total
|
651
|
|
832
|
|
938
|
203
|
|
267
|
|
238
|
182
|
|
245
|
|
337
|
266
|
|
320
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female
|
129
|
|
151
|
|
196
|
40
|
|
45
|
|
55
|
39
|
|
48
|
|
72
|
50
|
|
58
|
|
69
|
|
Male
|
522
|
|
681
|
|
742
|
163
|
|
222
|
|
183
|
143
|
|
197
|
|
265
|
216
|
|
262
|
|
294
|
|
Total
|
651
|
|
832
|
|
938
|
203
|
|
267
|
|
238
|
182
|
|
245
|
|
337
|
266
|
|
320
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
< 30
|
121
|
|
183
|
|
219
|
59
|
|
104
|
|
78
|
20
|
|
29
|
|
61
|
42
|
|
50
|
|
80
|
|
30 - 50
|
383
|
|
478
|
|
519
|
138
|
|
149
|
|
144
|
112
|
|
158
|
|
198
|
133
|
|
171
|
|
177
|
|
> 50
|
147
|
|
171
|
|
200
|
6
|
|
14
|
|
16
|
50
|
|
58
|
|
78
|
91
|
|
99
|
|
106
|
|
Total
|
651
|
|
832
|
|
938
|
203
|
|
267
|
|
238
|
182
|
|
245
|
|
337
|
266
|
|
320
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Employee engagement
|
Number of new hires payroll employees
(in FTEs) |
Total ASML
|
Asia
|
Europe
|
US
|
||||||||||||||||
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Number of new hires
|
3,010
|
|
3,479
|
|
2,219
|
1,595
|
|
1,299
|
|
558
|
644
|
|
1,348
|
|
1,102
|
771
|
|
832
|
|
559
|
|
Rate of new hires
(in %) |
19
|
|
17
|
|
10
|
37
|
|
24
|
|
10
|
8
|
|
14
|
|
9
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female
|
592
|
|
746
|
|
542
|
295
|
|
234
|
|
123
|
140
|
|
332
|
|
280
|
157
|
|
180
|
|
139
|
|
Male
|
2,418
|
|
2,733
|
|
1,677
|
1,300
|
|
1,065
|
|
435
|
504
|
|
1,016
|
|
822
|
614
|
|
652
|
|
420
|
|
Total
|
3,010
|
|
3,479
|
|
2,219
|
1,595
|
|
1,299
|
|
558
|
644
|
|
1,348
|
|
1,102
|
771
|
|
832
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
< 30
|
1,267
|
|
1,666
|
|
923
|
781
|
|
783
|
|
318
|
224
|
|
522
|
|
380
|
262
|
|
361
|
|
225
|
|
30 - 50
|
1,574
|
|
1,636
|
|
1,136
|
794
|
|
508
|
|
233
|
394
|
|
750
|
|
643
|
386
|
|
378
|
|
260
|
|
> 50
|
169
|
|
177
|
|
160
|
20
|
|
8
|
|
7
|
26
|
|
76
|
|
79
|
123
|
|
93
|
|
74
|
|
Total
|
3,010
|
|
3,479
|
|
2,219
|
1,595
|
|
1,299
|
|
558
|
644
|
|
1,348
|
|
1,102
|
771
|
|
832
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
2019
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee engagement
|
Employee Attrition (in %)
|
4.4
|
|
4.7
|
4.3
|
|
Attrition rate of high performers (in %)
|
1.8
|
|
2.2
|
2.4
|
A high performer is an employee with the merit classification 'exceptional' or 'exceeds expectations' from the annual employee performance evaluation.
|
|
|
Promotion rate - Overall (in %)
|
13
|
|
14
|
14
|
|
|
Promotion rate of high performers (in %)
|
37
|
|
40
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee engagement
|
Absenteeism (in %)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia 1
|
0.4
|
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
2.4
|
|
2.5
|
2.6
|
|
|
US
|
1.4
|
|
1.5
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
|||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee engagement
|
Open positions filled by internal candidates (in %)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
36
|
This is the worldwide average for Asia and Europe. US is excluded because the data is not yet available.
|
Rotation ratio (in %)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Human Capital Return On Investment (ROI) 1
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2.1
|
This number shows the degree to which economic value is derived from profitability in relation to human capital costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee engagement
|
People Performance Management process completion (in %)
|
98
|
|
96
|
|
97
|
|
|
Development Action Plan completion (in %)
|
89
|
|
81
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee engagement
|
Number of scholarships
|
50
|
|
53
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee engagement
|
Total training expenses (in million €)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
19
|
|
Out-of-pocket expenses for technical and non-product related trainings.
|
|
Average spent on training and development per FTE (€)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee engagement
|
Number of total training hours per FTE
|
|
|
|
New indicator for 2019 reporting. Total training hours include technical- and non-product related training hours (including nomination courses).
|
|||
Female
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
41
|
|
||
|
Male
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee engagement
|
Number of technical training hours per technical FTE 1
|
|
|
|
The scope is extended for 2019 reporting to include all eligible sectors (Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management, Customer Support and R&D). For more information see About the Non-Financial Information.
|
|||
|
Female
|
23
|
|
44
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
Male
|
18
|
|
30
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
Total
|
18
|
|
31
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee engagement
|
Number of non-product related training hours per FTE
|
|
|
|
Excluding nomination courses (leadership development programs).
|
|||
|
Female
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
Male
|
9
|
|
8
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Total
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee engagement
|
Nomination courses: Leadership Development Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Number of training hours
|
37,588
|
|
24,738
|
|
33,715
|
|
|
|
Number of employees attending (unique)
|
431
|
|
331
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
|||||||||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Gender
|
Age group
|
||||||||||||
Diversity & inclusion
|
Male/female in managerial positions and in Supervisory Board (in headcount) 1
|
Female
|
|
Male
|
|
Total
|
|
< 30
|
|
30 - 50
|
|
>50
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Supervisory Board
|
3
|
|
5
|
|
8
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
8
|
|
8
|
|
|
Board of Management
|
0
|
|
6
|
|
6
|
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
|
Senior Management
|
49
|
|
461
|
|
510
|
|
0
|
|
230
|
|
280
|
|
510
|
|
|
Middle Management
|
268
|
|
2,117
|
|
2,385
|
|
1
|
|
1,520
|
|
864
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
Junior Management
|
179
|
|
1,024
|
|
1,203
|
|
24
|
|
1,020
|
|
159
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
Other
|
3,492
|
|
16,018
|
|
19,510
|
|
4,433
|
|
12,368
|
|
2,709
|
|
19,510
|
|
|
Total
|
3,991
|
|
19,631
|
|
23,622
|
|
4,458
|
|
15,139
|
|
4,025
|
|
23,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diversity & inclusion
|
Male/female split by sector
(in FTE) |
Female
|
|
Male
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Customer Support
|
624
|
|
5,329
|
|
5,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management
|
1,094
|
|
4,839
|
|
5,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Research & Development
|
1,416
|
|
8,750
|
|
10,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
General & Administrative
|
759
|
|
1,139
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Sales and Mature Product Services
|
105
|
|
519
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Strategic Supply Management
|
87
|
|
239
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
4,085
|
|
20,815
|
|
24,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity & inclusion
|
Workforce by gender male / female (in %)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female
|
14
|
16
|
16
|
|
|
|
Male
|
86
|
84
|
84
|
|
|
|
Total
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity & inclusion
|
Number of nationalities working for ASML
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
25
|
34
|
36
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
94
|
105
|
103
|
|
|
|
US
|
76
|
84
|
82
|
|
|
|
Total
|
115
|
123
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity & inclusion
|
Foreign nationals working for ASML (in %) 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
24
|
29
|
31
|
|
|
|
US
|
26
|
29
|
29
|
|
|
|
Total
|
20
|
24
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor relations
|
Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements
|
46
|
%
|
48
|
%
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair remuneration
|
Ratio of base salary of women to men
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Management
|
106
|
%
|
107
|
%
|
103
|
%
|
|
|
Middle Management
|
97
|
%
|
99
|
%
|
99
|
%
|
|
|
Non-management
|
99
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair remuneration
|
Ratio of total cash of women to men
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Management
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
102
|
%
|
Total cash is base salary plus short-term incentive.
|
|
Middle Management
|
96
|
%
|
98
|
%
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
Non-Management
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Fair remuneration
|
Internal pay ratio (CEO versus employee remuneration)
|
32
|
|
32
|
|
41
|
|
For more information, see Leadership and governance - Remuneration Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community involvement
|
Number of students met
|
7,299
|
|
11,694
|
|
8,998
|
|
|
Time investment of volunteers (in hours) - Technology promotion and Campus promotion
|
4,533
|
|
5,257
|
|
5,445
|
|
|
|
|
Time investment of volunteers (in hours) - Community Involvement
|
4,545
|
|
5,434
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
Cash commitments - Charity (x €1,000)
|
749
|
|
700
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
Cash commitments - Sponsorship
(x €1,000) |
620
|
|
784
|
|
3,416
|
|
|
|
Total cost of volunteering (x €1,000)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our people
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee safety
|
ASML recordable incident rate
|
0.26
|
|
0.24
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
Number of recordable incidents
|
45
|
|
49
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
Number of fatalities
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee safety
|
Number of recordable incidents
by region: |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Asia
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
US
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee safety
|
Number of first-aid incidents per body part affected:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Head
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
Eyes
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Shoulder
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Chest
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Back
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Arm
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Hand
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
Leg
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
Foot
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Other
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee safety
|
Number of first-aid incidents per region:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Asia
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
US
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Employee safety
|
Number of near misses by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Asia
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,031
|
|
A near miss is an unplanned event which did not result in injury, illness, or damage, but had the potential to do so.
|
|
Europe
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
US
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our supply chain
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Responsible supply chain
|
RBA Code of Conduct compliance contract clause for LTSA suppliers (in %)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
Timely closure of sustainability gaps (in %) 1
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Responsible supply chain
|
Suppliers assessed on sustainability (in #) split by:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Audits
|
10
|
|
2
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
RBA Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Responsible supply chain
|
Suppliers identified with overall risk level 'high' on all sustainability elements (in #)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0
|
|
The risk level is determined by means of the RBA SAQ, applied to major product-related suppliers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Responsible supply chain
|
High sustainability risks identified (in #)
split by sustainability elements: |
|
|
|
See comment above.
|
|||
|
Ethics
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Labor
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Health and safety
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Environment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Responsible supply chain
|
Improvement plan in place for suppliers with high risk on one of the sustainability elements (in #)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
See comment above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Responsible supply chain
|
Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
100
|
%
|
One high risk supplier was identified with potential negative environmental impacts. A follow-up plan is agreed with this supplier.
|
|
Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0
|
%
|
Three high risk suppliers were identified with potential negative social impacts. We are engaging with the suppliers to develop plans for improvements.
|
|
Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our supply chain
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Our supply chain
|
Total sourcing spend (in million €)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Our supply chain
|
Sourcing spend per supplier group (in %)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Product related
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
Non-product related
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Our supply chain
|
Proportion of spending on local suppliers
(in %) 1 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Veldhoven
|
—
|
|
44
|
%
|
46
|
%
|
A relatively large amount of the total
supplier spend for Veldhoven relates to Carl Zeiss (non-local).
|
|
Linkou
|
—
|
|
51
|
%
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
San Diego
|
—
|
|
93
|
%
|
89
|
%
|
|
|
Wilton
|
—
|
|
64
|
%
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operations - Climate and Energy
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Energy
|
Energy consumption (in TJ)
|
1,321
|
|
1,355
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
Energy savings worldwide through projects (in TJ) 1
|
49
|
|
77
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Energy
|
Electricity purchased per location (in TJ)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Veldhoven
|
687
|
|
712
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
Wilton
|
97
|
|
102
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
Linkou
|
37
|
|
37
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
San Diego
|
158
|
|
177
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
Total
|
979
|
|
1,028
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Energy
|
Fossil fuels consumed from non-renewable sources (in TJ) 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fossil fuels consumed consists of only natural gas.
|
|
Veldhoven
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
Wilton
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
Linkou
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
San Diego
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Fossil fuels consumed from renewable sources (in TJ)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Energy efficiency of products
|
System energy efficiency NXT
|
|
|
|
|
|||
System
|
NXT:
2000i |
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
No new NXT system was introduced in 2018 and 2019. Therefore there are no measurements in these years.
|
|
|
Throughput
|
275
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Measured energy efficiency
(kWh / wafer pass) 3 |
0.51
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
See comment above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CO2 Emissions
|
Emission intensity 4
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CO2 Emissions
|
Type of Energy Attribute Certificates (in TJ)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guarantee of Origins (GOs)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CO2 Emissions
|
Type of Energy Attribute Certificates
(in kton) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guarantee of Origins (GOs)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operations - Circular economy
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
20173
|
|
20183
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waste
|
Total waste generated (in 1,000 kg)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Waste from operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,927
|
|
|
|
Construction waste 1
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
3,935
|
|
5,292
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Waste
|
Total hazardous waste (in 1,000 kg) 2
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Recycling
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
Recovery, including energy recovery
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Incineration (mass burn)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
Landfill
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Total
|
333
|
|
347
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Waste
|
Total non-hazardous waste (in 1,000 kg) 2
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Recycling
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
Recovery, including energy recovery
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
Incineration (mass burn)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
Landfill
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
Total
|
3,602
|
|
4,945
|
|
4,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Waste
|
Total construction waste (in 1,000 kg) 1, 2
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Recycling
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
Recovery, including energy recovery
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Landfill
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Waste
|
Total waste disposed (% of total
waste from operations) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Incineration without energy recovery
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
Landfill
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Lifetime extension of mature systems
|
Used lithography systems sold
|
24
|
|
17
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and Innovation Ecosystem - Product Safety
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Product safety
|
Percentage of product types shipped that have a SEMI S2 Safety Guidelines compliance report
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Number of (significant) fines for non-compliance with product design related laws and regulations
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Product safety
|
% RoHS compliant parts
|
89.0
|
%
|
91.6
|
%
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
% RoHS non-compliant parts
|
1.0
|
%
|
0.8
|
%
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
% RoHS unknown
|
10.0
|
%
|
7.6
|
%
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Ethics and Compliance
|
||||||||
Theme
|
Description
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Business ethics and compliance
|
Total number of Speak Up messages
|
230
|
|
266
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
Anti-corruption & bribery Speak Up messages 1
|
24
|
|
33
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
Human rights Speak Up messages
|
44
|
|
63
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
% Completion of Code of Conduct online training
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stakeholder
|
Main communication channels
|
Most relevant themes
|
|
|
|
Customers
|
•
Customer Loyalty Survey
•
Direct interaction via account teams and zone quality managers
•
Voice of the customer auditorium sessions
•
Bi-annual Technology Review Meetings (between our major customers, ASML’s CTO, product managers and other ASML executives) and Executive Review Meetings (between ASML executives and major clients)
•
Different technology symposia and special events
|
•
Technology and innovation ecosystem
•
Employee engagement
•
Operational excellence
•
Customer intimacy
•
Climate and energy - our products
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
•
Direct interaction with the Investor Relations department (e.g. financial results conference calls, investor visits to ASML, visits to investors during roadshows)
•
AGM
•
Investor Day (scheduled as needed, usually every other year)
•
Different investor conferences
•
Various sustainability self-assessments and survey feedback
|
•
Financial performance
•
Technology and innovation ecosystem
•
Our people
•
Business risk & business continuity
•
Business ethics & compliance
•
Our supply chain
|
|
|
|
Employees 1
|
•
Employee satisfaction survey
•
Feedback from online training programs (e.g. ethics/Code of Conduct)
•
ASML Speak up service
•
Works Council
•
Young ASML 2, Women@ASML, Seniors@ASML, Pink ASML 3
•
Intranet articles
•
Onboarding sessions for new employees
•
Lunches with board members
•
All-employee meeting
•
Senior Management meetings
•
Departmental meetings
|
•
Our people - diversity & inclusion
•
Climate and energy - our operations
•
Technology and innovation ecosystem
•
Climate and energy - our products
•
Circular economy
•
Our people - employee development
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
•
ASML’s supplier days
•
Supplier Relationship Satisfaction Survey
•
Direct interaction via supplier account teams / procurement account managers
•
Supplier audits
•
ASML Speak up service
|
•
Our supply chain
•
Customer intimacy
•
Technology and innovation ecosystem
•
Business risk & continuity
|
|
|
|
Society
|
|
|
a. Industry peers
|
•
SEMI meetings
•
Responsible Business Alliance meetings and workgroups
•
FME4 events and meetings
|
•
Our people - employee development
•
Community involvement
•
Technology and innovation ecosystem
•
Climate and energy - our operations
•
Business ethics - human rights
•
Our supply chain - human rights
|
b. Governments 5
|
•
Meetings with municipalities and regional and national government officials
•
EU joint technology initiatives
|
|
c. Universities
|
•
ASML scholarship programs
•
Internships
•
Partnerships with universities and institutes (e.g. in the Netherlands, Korea, Taiwan)
•
Labor market communication program
|
|
d. Local Communities & Other
|
•
Neighbor Evening
•
Brainport 6
•
HighTechXL 7
•
Make Next Platform 8
•
Jet-Net
•
Dutch technology week
•
Company visits
•
Meetings with various schools and local cultural institutions (e.g. in the Netherlands and U.S.)
•
ASML Speak up service
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Including Works Council and unions.
|
2.
|
Internal platform that aims to connect, develop, and support young professionals within ASML via social and professional initiatives.
|
3.
|
Internal platform that aims to contribute to making ASML a safe and great place to work, which explicitly welcomes diversity in gender expression and sexual orientation.
|
4.
|
FME is a Dutch organization that represents employers and businesses in the technology industry.
|
5.
|
Including regulatory bodies in the countries where ASML operates and municipalities.
|
6.
|
Brainport Eindhoven Region (the Netherlands) is an innovative technology region, home to world-class businesses, knowledge institutes, and research institutions.
|
7.
|
HighTechXL is a European hub for high-tech hardware startups.
|
8.
|
The Platform provides the future generation of manufacturing companies with the unique opportunity to gain access to the networks, knowledge and expertise of leading Dutch companies.
|
Year ended December 31
|
20151
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net sales
|
6,287.4
|
|
6,875.1
|
|
8,962.7
|
|
10,944.0
|
|
11,820.0
|
|
Cost of sales
|
(3,391.7
|
)
|
(3,729.8
|
)
|
(4,942.5
|
)
|
(5,914.8
|
)
|
(6,540.2
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
2,895.7
|
|
3,145.3
|
|
4,020.2
|
|
5,029.2
|
|
5,279.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
83.2
|
|
93.8
|
|
95.8
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Research and development costs
|
(1,068.1
|
)
|
(1,105.8
|
)
|
(1,259.7
|
)
|
(1,575.9
|
)
|
(1,968.5
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative costs
|
(345.7
|
)
|
(374.8
|
)
|
(416.6
|
)
|
(488.0
|
)
|
(520.5
|
)
|
Income from operations
|
1,565.1
|
|
1,758.5
|
|
2,439.7
|
|
2,965.3
|
|
2,790.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
(16.5
|
)
|
33.7
|
|
(50.3
|
)
|
(28.3
|
)
|
(25.0
|
)
|
Income before income taxes
|
1,548.6
|
|
1,792.2
|
|
2,389.4
|
|
2,937.0
|
|
2,765.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
(161.4
|
)
|
(234.4
|
)
|
(306.0
|
)
|
(351.6
|
)
|
(191.7
|
)
|
Income after income taxes
|
1,387.2
|
|
1,557.8
|
|
2,083.4
|
|
2,585.4
|
|
2,574.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) related to equity method investments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
6.2
|
|
18.2
|
|
Net income
|
1,387.2
|
|
1,557.8
|
|
2,066.7
|
|
2,591.6
|
|
2,592.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic net income per ordinary share
|
3.22
|
|
3.66
|
|
4.81
|
|
6.10
|
|
6.16
|
|
Diluted net income per ordinary share
|
3.21
|
|
3.64
|
|
4.79
|
|
6.08
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Number of ordinary shares used in computing per share amounts (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic
|
430.6
|
|
425.6
|
|
429.8
|
|
424.9
|
|
420.8
|
|
Diluted
|
432.6
|
|
427.7
|
|
431.6
|
|
426.4
|
|
421.6
|
|
1.
|
As of January 1, 2018, ASML has adopted the new Revenue Recognition Standard (ASC 606) and Lease Standard (ASC 842). The comparative numbers of 2015 have not been adjusted to reflect these changes in accounting policy.
|
As of and for the year ended December 31
|
20151
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consolidated Balance Sheets data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
2,458.7
|
|
|
2,906.9
|
|
|
2,259.0
|
|
|
3,121.1
|
|
|
3,532.3
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
950.0
|
|
|
1,150.0
|
|
|
1,029.3
|
|
|
913.3
|
|
|
1,185.8
|
|
|
Working capital 2
|
4,600.4
|
|
|
5,434.9
|
|
|
5,715.8
|
|
|
6,739.5
|
|
|
7,437.0
|
|
|
Total assets
|
13,295.0
|
|
|
17,155.0
|
|
|
18,188.9
|
|
|
20,136.9
|
|
|
22,629.6
|
|
|
Long-term debt 3
|
1,129.7
|
|
|
3,319.5
|
|
|
3,025.3
|
|
|
3,026.5
|
|
|
3,108.3
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
8,388.8
|
|
|
9,972.4
|
|
|
10,776.4
|
|
|
11,641.0
|
|
|
12,592.2
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding shares
|
38.8
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization 4
|
296.9
|
|
|
356.9
|
|
|
417.5
|
|
|
422.7
|
|
|
448.5
|
|
|
Impairment
|
2.3
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
2,025.5
|
|
|
1,665.9
|
|
|
1,818.3
|
|
|
3,072.7
|
|
|
3,276.4
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment 5
|
(371.8
|
)
|
|
(316.3
|
)
|
|
(338.9
|
)
|
|
(574.0
|
)
|
|
(766.6
|
)
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|
(119.3
|
)
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
(950.0
|
)
|
|
(2,520.0
|
)
|
|
(1,129.3
|
)
|
|
(918.1
|
)
|
|
(1,291.5
|
)
|
|
Maturity of short-term investments
|
334.9
|
|
|
2,320.0
|
|
|
1,250.0
|
|
|
1,034.1
|
|
|
1,019.0
|
|
|
Cash from (used for) derivative financial instruments
|
(171.9
|
)
|
|
(15.0
|
)
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Loans issued and other investments
|
—
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Repayment on loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
Acquisition of equity method investments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,019.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiary (net of cash acquired)
|
—
|
|
|
(2,641.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(1,159.9
|
)
|
|
(3,188.4
|
)
|
|
(1,229.0
|
)
|
|
(491.5
|
)
|
|
(1,157.5
|
)
|
|
Dividend paid
|
(302.3
|
)
|
|
(445.9
|
)
|
|
(516.7
|
)
|
|
(597.1
|
)
|
|
(1,325.7
|
)
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
(564.9
|
)
|
|
(400.0
|
)
|
|
(500.0
|
)
|
|
(1,146.2
|
)
|
|
(410.0
|
)
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of shares
|
33.2
|
|
|
582.7
|
|
6
|
50.6
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of notes
|
—
|
|
|
2,230.6
|
|
7
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
(243.0
|
)
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
Tax benefit (deficit) from share-based payments
|
3.7
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net cash from (used in) financing activities
|
(833.9
|
)
|
|
1,963.6
|
|
|
(1,209.1
|
)
|
|
(1,724.3
|
)
|
|
(1,712.3
|
)
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
39.2
|
|
|
448.2
|
|
|
(647.9
|
)
|
|
862.1
|
|
|
411.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
As of January 1, 2018, ASML has adopted the new Revenue Recognition Standard (ASC 606) and Lease Standard (ASC 842). The comparative numbers of 2015 have not been adjusted to reflect these changes in accounting policy.
|
2.
|
Working capital is calculated as the difference between total current assets and total current liabilities.
|
3.
|
Long-term debt includes the current portion of long-term debt.
|
4.
|
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation of property, plant and equipment, amortization of intangible assets, and amortization of underwriting commissions and discount related to the bonds and credit facility.
|
5.
|
In 2016, net proceeds from issuance of shares include an amount of €536.6 million which is included in the consideration transferred for the acquisition of HMI.
|
6.
|
In 2016, net proceeds from issuance of notes relate to the total cash proceeds of €2,230.6 million (net of incurred transaction costs) from the issuance of our €500 million 0.625% senior notes due 2022, our €1,000 million 1.375% senior notes due 2026 and our €750 million 1.625% senior notes due 2027.
|
As of and for the year ended December 31
|
20151
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios and other data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales
|
46.1
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
Income from operations as a percentage of net sales
|
24.9
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
Net income as a percentage of net sales
|
22.1
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity as a percentage of total assets
|
63.1
|
|
|
58.1
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
|
Income taxes as a percentage of income before income taxes
|
10.4
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
Sales of lithography systems (in units) 2
|
169
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
Value of booked systems (in millions €) 3,4
|
4,639.0
|
|
|
5,396.3
|
|
|
9,357.2
|
|
|
8,180.7
|
|
|
11,741.0
|
|
|
Net bookings lithography systems (in units) 2,3,4
|
165
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
Number of payroll employees (in FTEs)
|
12,168
|
|
|
13,991
|
|
|
16,219
|
|
|
20,044
|
|
|
23,219
|
|
|
Number of temporary employees (in FTEs)
|
2,513
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) net sales in percentage
|
7.4
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
Number of ordinary shares issued and outstanding
(in millions)
|
428.0
|
|
|
429.9
|
|
|
427.4
|
|
|
421.1
|
|
|
419.8
|
|
|
Closing ASML share price on Euronext Amsterdam
(in €)
|
82.55
|
|
|
106.65
|
|
|
145.15
|
|
|
137.16
|
|
|
263.70
|
|
|
Volatility 260 days as percentage of our shares listed on Euronext Amsterdam (in €) 5
|
33.62
|
|
|
25.47
|
|
|
18.84
|
|
|
29.60
|
|
|
26.15
|
|
|
Closing ASML share price on NASDAQ (in USD)
|
88.77
|
|
|
112.20
|
|
|
173.82
|
|
|
155.62
|
|
|
295.94
|
|
|
Volatility 260 days as percentage of our shares listed on NASDAQ (in USD) 6
|
28.94
|
|
|
26.85
|
|
|
21.80
|
|
|
35.74
|
|
|
28.06
|
|
|
Dividend per ordinary share (in €)
|
1.05
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
Dividend per ordinary share (in USD)
|
1.21
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
As of January 1, 2018, ASML has adopted the new Revenue Recognition Standard (ASC 606) and Lease Standard (ASC 842). The comparative numbers of 2015 have not been adjusted to reflect these changes in accounting policy.
|
2.
|
Lithography systems do not include metrology and inspection systems.
|
3.
|
Our systems net bookings include all system sales orders for which written authorizations have been accepted (for EUV starting with the NXE:3350B and excluding the High-NA systems).
|
4.
|
Our systems net bookings values for 2015, 2016, and 2017 have been calculated without taking into consideration the adoption of the new Revenue Recognition Standard (ASC 606) and Lease Standard (ASC 842) which ASML adopted effective January 1, 2018.
|
5.
|
Volatility represents the variability in our share price on Euronext Amsterdam as measured over the 260 business days of each year presented (source: Bloomberg Finance LP).
|
6.
|
Volatility represents the variability in our share price on NASDAQ as measured over the 260 business days of each year presented (source: Bloomberg Finance LP).
|
7.
|
Subject to approval of the AGM to be held on April 22, 2020.
|
8.
|
The dividend per ordinary share in USD has been adjusted compared to the relevant Integrated Report based on US GAAP in order to reflect the actual exchange rate at the time of each year's dividend payment.
|
9.
|
The exchange rate used to express the interim and final proposed dividend per ordinary share in USD is the exchange rate of USD/€1.10 as of January 27, 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Year ended December 31
(in thousands) |
2018
|
2019
|
||||||||||
KPMG Accountants N.V.
€ |
|
KPMG Network
€ |
|
Total 1
€ |
|
KPMG Accountants N.V.
€ |
|
KPMG Network
€ |
|
Total
€ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Audit fees
|
1,602
|
|
649
|
|
2,251
|
|
2,086
|
|
815
|
|
2,901
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
70
|
|
—
|
|
70
|
|
70
|
|
—
|
|
70
|
|
Tax fees
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
All other fees
|
24
|
|
—
|
|
24
|
|
9
|
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Principal accountant fees
|
1,696
|
|
649
|
|
2,345
|
|
2,165
|
|
815
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The fees for 2018 have been adjusted to include an additional amount of €131 thousand relating to audit procedures over the financial year 2018 that were agreed after the publication of the 2018 Integrated Report.
|
•
|
Does not carry on and has not carried on a business in the Netherlands through a (deemed) permanent establishment or a permanent representative to which the ordinary shares are attributable;
|
•
|
Does not hold and has not held a (deemed) substantial interest in our share capital or, in the event the Non-Resident Holder holds or has held a (deemed) substantial interest in our share capital, such interest is, or was, a business asset in the hands of the holder;
|
•
|
Does not share and has not shared directly (through the beneficial ownership of ordinary shares or similar securities) in the profits of an enterprise managed and controlled in the Netherlands which (is deemed to) own(s), or (is deemed to have) has owned, our ordinary shares; and
|
•
|
Does not carry out and has not carried out any activities which generate taxable profit in the Netherlands or taxable income in the Netherlands to which the holding of our ordinary shares was connected.
|
•
|
The holder carries on a business in the Netherlands through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in the Netherlands (Dutch enterprise) and the ordinary shares are attributable to this permanent establishment or permanent representative, unless the participation exemption (discussed below) applies; or
|
•
|
The holder has a substantial interest in our share capital, which is held with the primary aim or one of the primary aims to evade the levy of income tax at the level of another person and which is not put into place with valid commercial reasons that reflect economic reality; or
|
•
|
The holder is a resident of Aruba, Curacao or Saint Martin with a permanent establishment or permanent representative in Bonaire, Eustatius or Saba to which our ordinary shares are attributable and certain conditions are met; or
|
•
|
Certain assets of the holder are deemed to be treated as a Dutch enterprise under Dutch tax law and the ordinary shares are attributable to this Dutch enterprise.
|
•
|
Dividends in cash and in kind;
|
•
|
Deemed and constructive dividends;
|
•
|
Consideration for the repurchase or redemption of ordinary shares (including a purchase by a direct or indirect ASML subsidiary) in excess of qualifying average paid-in capital unless such repurchase is made for temporary investment purposes or is exempt by law;
|
•
|
Stock dividends up to their nominal value (unless distributed out of qualifying paid-in capital);
|
•
|
Any (partial) repayment of paid-in capital not qualifying as capital for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes; and
|
•
|
Liquidation proceeds in excess of qualifying average paid-in capital for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes.
|
•
|
An exemption at source is available if the participation exemption applies and the ordinary shares are attributable to a business carried out in the Netherlands;
|
•
|
An exemption at source is available for dividend distributions to certain qualifying EU/EEA resident corporate holders, unless such holder holds our ordinary shares with the primary aim or one of the primary aims to evade the levy of Dutch dividend withholding tax at the level of another person and our ordinary shares are not held for valid commercial reasons that reflect economic reality;
|
•
|
An exemption at source is available for dividend distributions to certain qualifying corporate holders that are a resident of a non-EU/EEA jurisdiction with which the Netherlands has concluded a tax treaty that includes a dividend article, unless such holder holds our ordinary shares with the primary aim or one of the primary aims to evade the levy of Dutch dividend withholding tax at the level of another person and our ordinary shares are not held for valid commercial reasons that reflect economic reality;
|
•
|
Certain tax exempt organizations (e.g. pension funds and excluding collective investment vehicles) resident in EU/EEA member states or in qualifying non-EU/EEA states may be eligible for a refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax upon their request. Based on domestic law not yet entered into force, in those circumstances, an exemption at source may also become available upon request;
|
•
|
Upon request and under certain conditions, certain qualifying Non-Resident Individual and Corporate Holders of ordinary shares resident in EU/EEA member states or in a qualifying non-EU/EEA state may be eligible for a refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax insofar the withholding tax levied is higher than the personal and corporate income tax which would have been due if they were resident of the Netherlands.
|
•
|
An individual citizen or tax resident of the US; or
|
•
|
A corporation or other entity treated as a corporation for US federal income tax purposes created or organized in or under the laws of the US or of any political subdivision thereof; or
|
•
|
An estate of which the income is subject to US federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
•
|
A trust whose administration is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the US and which has one or more US persons who have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions.
|
•
|
The ability to develop new and enhanced semiconductor equipment and services that are competitively priced and introduced on a timely basis;
|
•
|
The technical performance characteristics of a lithography system;
|
•
|
The productivity, cost-effectiveness and level of technical support of semiconductor-related services;
|
•
|
The cost of ownership of lithography systems based on purchase price, maintenance costs, availability, productivity, and customer service and support costs;
|
•
|
The ability to effectively service the installed base of our systems;
|
•
|
The ability to successfully introduce new technology systems and manage technology roadmaps to high-volume manufacturing;
|
•
|
The exchange rate of the euro against the functional currency of our competitors and our customers, particularly against the Japanese yen;
|
•
|
The strength and breadth of our portfolio of patents and other intellectual property rights and the ability to protect and defend patents; and
|
•
|
Our customers’ desire to obtain lithography equipment and related services from more than one supplier.
|
Item
|
Form 20-F Caption
|
Location in this document
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
Part I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Key Information
|
|
|
|
A. Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Selected financial data
|
|
|
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
D. Risk Factors
|
|
|
|
|
How we manage risk - Risk factors
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Information on the Company
|
|
|
|
A. History and Development of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do - Our company - Our core values
|
11
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do - Our company - Where we come from
|
11
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9 Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - ASML worldwide contact information
|
|
|
B. Business Overview
|
|
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do - Our company
|
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do - Our products and services
|
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do - Our markets
|
|
|
|
What we achieved in 2019 - Technology and innovation ecosystem - How we innovate
|
|
|
|
What we achieved in 2019 - Technology and innovation ecosystem - Customer intimacy
|
|
|
|
What we achieved in 2019 - Our supply chain - Our supply chain
|
|
|
|
How we manage risk - Risk factors
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 2 Revenue from contracts with customers
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 3 Segment disclosure
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 16 Commitments, contingencies and guarantees
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Competition
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Government regulation
|
|
|
C. Organizational Structure
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Corporate governance - Other information on governance
|
|
|
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 12 Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
4A
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
|
|
|
|
Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do - Our company - Our purpose
|
|
|
Who we are and what we do - Our strategy
|
|
|
|
CFO financial review - Long-term growth opportunities - Outlook 2025
|
|
|
|
CFO financial review - Financial performance - ASML operations update on key performance indicators
|
|
|
|
CFO financial review - Long-term growth opportunities - Trend information
|
|
|
A. Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
CFO financial review - Financial performance - Operating results of 2019 compared to 2018
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9 Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 15 Long-term debt and interest and other costs
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 16 Commitments, contingencies and guarantees
|
|
|
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
How we manage risk - Risk factors - Strategy and products - Failure to adequately protect the intellectual property rights upon which we depend could harm our business
|
78
|
|
|
How we manage risk - Risk factors - Strategy and products - Defending against intellectual property claims brought by others could harm our business
|
79
|
|
|
What we achieved in 2019 - Technology and innovation ecosystem
|
|
|
|
CFO financial review - Financial performance - Operating results of 2019 compared to 2018
|
|
|
D. Trend Information
|
|
|
|
|
CFO financial review - Long-term growth opportunities - Trend information
|
|
|
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9 Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 16 Commitments, contingencies and guarantees
|
|
|
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 16 Commitments, contingencies and guarantees
|
|
|
G. Safe Harbor
|
|
|
|
|
Special note regarding forward-looking statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
|
|
|
|
A. Directors and Senior Management
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Board of Management
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Supervisory Board
|
|
|
B. Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Remuneration report
|
|
|
C. Board Practices
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Board of Management
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Supervisory Board
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Supervisory Board report - Supervisory Board Committees
|
101
|
|
D. Employees
|
|
|
|
|
How we manage risk - Risk factors - Our business and future success depend on our ability to manage the growth of our organization and attract and retain a sufficient number of adequately educated and skilled employees
|
82
|
|
|
What we achieved in 2019 - Our people - Labor relations
|
37
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 18 Employee benefits
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 Personnel expenses and employee information
|
|
|
|
Non-financial statements - Non-financial indicators - Our people - Employee engagement - Number of FTEs (payroll and temporary)
|
|
|
E. Share Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Remuneration report
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Corporate governance - Other information on governance - Ordinary shares
|
129
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 17 Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|
|
|
|
A. Major Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Corporate governance - Other information on governance - Reporting obligations under the Act on the supervision of financial markets (‘Wet op het financieel toezicht’, the FMSA) and under US securities laws
|
131
|
|
B. Related Party Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 25 Related party transactions
|
|
|
C. Interests of Experts & Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Financial Information
|
|
|
|
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
B. Significant Changes
|
|
|
|
|
CFO financial review - Long-term growth opportunities
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 26 Subsequent events
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
The Offer and Listing
|
|
|
|
A. Offer and Listing Details
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Offer and listing details
|
|
|
B. Plan of Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
C. Markets
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Offer and listing details
|
|
|
D. Selling Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
E. Dilution
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
F. Expenses of the Issue
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Additional Information
|
|
|
|
A. Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate governance - Other information on governance - Amendment of our Articles of Association
|
131
|
|
C. Material Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Material contracts
|
|
|
D. Exchange Controls
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Exchange controls
|
|
|
E. Taxation
|
|
|
|
|
How we manage risk - Tax policy
|
|
|
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
G. Statement by Experts
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
H. Documents on Display
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Documents on display
|
|
|
I. Subsidiary Information
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Corporate governance - Other information on governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 3 Segment disclosure
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 4 Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 24 Financial risk management - Paragraph on valuation techniques used
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Controls and procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
16A
|
Audit Committee Financial Expert
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Supervisory Board report - Supervisory Board Committees
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
16B
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
|
|
|
How we manage risk - Business ethics and compliance - Business ethics
|
|
|
|
|
|
16C
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
|
|
Other appendices - Appendix - Principal accountant fees and services
|
|
|
|
|
|
16D
|
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
16E
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 21 Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
16F
|
Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
16G
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership and governance - Corporate governance - Other information on governance - NASDAQ Corporate Governance Standards
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
16H
|
Mine Safety Disclosure
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3TG
|
|
Tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold
|
|
|
|
AFM
|
|
Autoriteit Financiële Markten; Authority for the Financial Markets of the Netherlands
|
|
|
|
AGM
|
|
Annual General Meeting
|
|
|
|
ArF
|
|
Argon Fluoride
|
|
|
|
ArFi
|
|
Argon Fluoride Immersion
|
|
|
|
ASC
|
|
Accounting Standards Codification
|
|
|
|
ASML
|
|
ASML Holding N.V. and / or any of its subsidiaries and / or any equity method investments, as the context may require
|
|
|
|
ASML Foundation
|
|
The ASML Foundation supports projects in the regions where ASML operates. It’s aim is to increase the self-sufficiency of disadvantaged youngsters (4 - 18 years old) through educational initiatives that develop their talents and unlock their potential
|
|
|
|
ASP
|
|
Average Sales Price, which is the reported revenue divided by the reported units
|
|
|
|
ASU
|
|
Accounting Standards Update
|
|
|
|
BEAT
|
|
Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax regime
|
|
|
|
BEPS
|
|
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting
|
|
|
|
BoM
|
|
Board of Management
|
|
|
|
Brion
|
|
Brion Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Business Principles
|
|
Business principles of ASML
|
|
|
|
Canon
|
|
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|
|
|
|
CCIP
|
|
Customer Co-Investment Program
|
|
|
|
CEO
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
CFO
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Code
|
|
Dutch Corporate Governance Code
|
|
|
|
Code of Conduct
|
|
Code of ethics and conduct
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
ASML Holding N.V.
|
|
|
|
CO2
|
|
Carbon Dioxide
|
|
|
|
Scope 1 CO2 emissions
|
|
Consists of the combustion of natural gas and purchased CO2
|
|
|
|
Scope 2 CO2 emissions
|
|
Calculated by multiplying electricity consumptions of the manufacturing locations by the local conversion factors
|
|
|
|
COO
|
|
Chief Operations Officer
|
|
|
|
CTO
|
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
|
|
|
Cymer
|
|
Cymer Inc., Cymer LLC and its subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
D&E
|
|
Development and Engineering
|
|
|
|
DAP
|
|
Development Action Plan
|
|
|
|
DRAM
|
|
Dynamic Random Access Memory (often called performance memory)
|
|
|
|
Dutch Central Bank
|
|
The Dutch Central Bank (De Nederlandsche Bank), which is the supervisor of all pension companies in the Netherlands
|
|
|
|
DUV
|
|
Deep Ultraviolet
|
|
|
|
EEA
|
|
European Economic Area
|
|
|
|
EGM
|
|
Extraordinary General Meeting
|
|
|
|
EHS
|
|
Environment, Health and Safety
|
|
|
|
EHS Competence Center
|
|
Defines EHS standards for ASML, gathers best-known practices and helps managers across the business to implement these
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Europe, the Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
|
ERM
|
|
Enterprise Risk Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
ESG score
|
|
Integrated scoring system on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors for credit rating decisions
|
|
|
|
EURIBOR
|
|
Euro Interbank Offered Rate
|
|
|
|
Eurobonds
|
|
A bond that is denominated in Euro
|
|
|
|
Euroclear Nederland
|
|
Nederlands Centraal Instituut voor Giraal Effectenverkeer B.V.
|
|
|
|
Euronext Amsterdam
|
|
Euronext Amsterdam N.V.
|
|
|
|
EU
|
|
European Union
|
|
|
|
EUV
|
|
Extreme Ultraviolet
|
|
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
US Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
Fab
|
|
Fabrication plant (semiconductors)
|
|
|
|
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board
|
|
|
|
FAT
|
|
Factory Acceptance Test
|
|
|
|
FMSA
|
|
Financial Markets Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft))
|
|
|
|
Foundation
|
|
Stichting Preferente Aandelen ASML
|
|
|
|
Foundry
|
|
Contract Manufacturers of Logic Chips
|
|
|
|
FTEs
|
|
Full-time equivalents
|
|
|
|
GDPR
|
|
General Data Protection Regulation
|
|
|
|
GRI
|
|
Global Reporting Initiative
|
|
|
|
GRI standards
|
|
GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards
|
|
|
|
GILTI
|
|
Global Intangible Low-Tax regime
|
|
|
|
High-NA
|
|
High Numerical Aperture
|
|
|
|
HMI
|
|
Hermes Microvision, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Holistic Lithography
|
|
Adjusting the patterning process steps as a whole, in order to support optimization of the entire chip making process
|
|
|
|
IC
|
|
Integrated Circuit
|
|
|
|
IDM
|
|
Integrated device manufacturer
|
|
|
|
i-line
|
|
Lithography system with a mercury lamp as light source
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.
|
|
|
|
Imaging
|
|
Transferring the pattern structure on the wafer
|
|
|
|
imec
|
|
Interuniversitair Micro-Elektronica Centrum
|
|
|
|
Installed Base Management
|
|
Net service and field option sales
|
|
|
|
Intel
|
|
Intel Corporation
|
|
|
|
Internet of Things (IoT)
|
|
The internetworking of physical devices, vehicles, buildings and other items—embedded with electronics, software, sensors, actuators, and network connectivity that enable these objects to collect and exchange data
|
|
|
|
IRS
|
|
Internal Revenue Service
|
|
|
|
ISO
|
|
International Organization for Standardization
|
|
|
|
KPI
|
|
Key Performance Indicator
|
|
|
|
KPMG
|
|
KPMG Accountants N.V.
|
|
|
|
KrF
|
|
Krypton Fluoride
|
|
|
|
kWh
|
|
kilo Watt hour
|
|
|
|
LGBTI
|
|
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
London Interbank Offered Rate
|
|
|
|
Logic
|
|
Integrated Device Manufacturers and Foundries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
LTI
|
|
Long-Term Incentive
|
|
|
|
Mapper
|
|
Mapper Lithography Holding By., Mapper Lithography By, and Mapper Lithography P B.V. (together “Mapper”)
|
|
|
|
Memory
|
|
NAND-Flash Memory and DRAM Memory chip makers
|
|
|
|
mm
|
|
Millimeter (one thousandth of a meter)
|
|
|
|
MOU
|
|
Memorandum of Understanding
|
|
|
|
NAND
|
|
A binary operator composite of ‘NOT AND’ (often called storage memory)
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ
|
|
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
|
|
|
New York Transfer Agent
|
|
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
|
Nikon
|
|
Nikon Corporation
|
|
|
|
Nikon Cross-License Agreement
|
|
The patent Cross-License agreement between Nikon and ASML related to lithography equipment used to manufacture semiconductor devices
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
Nanometer (one billionth of a meter)
|
|
|
|
Node
|
|
The ‘technology node’ (also known as the ‘process node’ or simply ‘node’) is a common metric used in the semiconductor industry to describe and differentiate the technologies used in fabricating microchips. Generally, a smaller technology node means a smaller feature size, allowing the production of smaller transistors which are both faster and use less power. Marketing claims and discrepancies among chip producers (foundries) means that the numbers assigned to a node - such as 45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm, 16 nm, 14 nm, or 10 nm - have lost the exact meaning they once held. The numbers now refer more to a specific generation of chips, made using a particular technology.
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
A numerical measure of a company’s historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows which are not calculated or presented in accordance with the most comparable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) measure
|
|
|
|
Non-Resident Holder
|
|
A holder of ordinary shares who is not, or is not deemed to be, a resident of the Netherlands for Dutch tax purposes
|
|
|
|
NXE
|
|
NXE platform; a new platform utilizing the concepts of the TWINSCAN platform with complete new technologies in three areas: light source, lens system, and vacuum body
|
|
|
|
NXT
|
|
TWINSCAN NXT systems; an improved version of the TWINSCAN systems, introducing new stages and stage position control technology, which enables improved imaging and overlay
|
|
|
|
OCI
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
OECD
|
|
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
|
|
|
|
Overlay
|
|
The layer-to-layer alignment of patterning structures
|
|
|
|
Pattern Fidelity
|
|
Improving how accurately a structure is printed and transferred compared to the design by use of metrology solutions (e.g. ASML YieldStar), inspection solutions (e.g. HMI e-beam tools) and statistical modeling to guide inspection on the wafer
|
|
|
|
Pattern Fidelity Control
|
|
Measuring how good a structure is printed and etched compared to the structure on the reticle
|
|
|
|
Patterning
|
|
The interaction of lithography and resist with etching, deposition, cleaning and metrology in order to produce a pattern on the wafer
|
|
|
|
PME
|
|
Bedrijfstakpensioenfonds Metalektro
|
|
|
|
Preference Share Option
|
|
An option to acquire cumulative preference shares in our capital
|
|
|
|
R&D
|
|
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
RBA
|
|
Responsible Business Alliance
|
|
|
|
REACH
|
|
Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals
|
|
|
|
Remuneration Policy
|
|
Remuneration Policy applicable to the Board of Management of ASML Holding N.V.
|
|
|
|
Reticle
|
|
Also known as Mask
|
|
|
|
ROAIC
|
|
Return on Average Invested Capital
|
|
|
|
RoHS
|
|
Restriction of Hazardous Substances
|
|
|
|
Reporting Unit ASML
|
|
Reporting Unit ASML (which is ASML excluding Reporting Unit Cymer Light Sources)
|
|
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Samsung Electronics Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
SAT
|
|
Site Acceptance Test
|
|
|
|
SB
|
|
Supervisory Board of ASML
|
|
|
|
SDG
|
|
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
|
|
|
|
SEC
|
|
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
|
|
SEMI
|
|
Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International
|
|
|
|
SEMI S2
|
|
The SEMI S2 Safety Guideline, Environmental, Health, and Safety Guideline for Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment, is intended as a set of performance-based EHS considerations for semiconductor manufacturing equipment.
|
|
|
|
SEMI S23
|
|
SEMI S23 Guide for Conservation of Energy, Utilities, and Materials Used by Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment prescribes a method to collect, analyze, and report energy-consuming semiconductor manufacturing equipment utility data.
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
Shrink
|
|
Shrink is the process of developing smaller transistors on chips, using increasingly sophisticated lithography techniques
|
|
|
|
Silicon Valley
|
|
Silicon Valley Group, Inc. (SVG)
|
|
|
|
STEM
|
|
Science, technology, engineering and maths
|
|
|
|
STI
|
|
Short-Term Incentive
|
|
|
|
Transistor
|
|
The transistor is the fundamental building block of modern electronic devices, and is ubiquitous in modern electronic systems. A transistor is a semiconductor device used to amplify or switch electronic signals and electrical power. It is composed of semiconductor material usually with at least three terminals for connection to an external circuit. A voltage or current applied to one pair of the transistor’s terminals controls the current through another pair of terminals. Because the controlled (output) power can be higher than the controlling (input) power, a transistor can amplify a signal. Transistors are in general found embedded in integrated circuits.
|
|
|
|
Throughput
|
|
The number of wafers a system can process per hour
|
|
|
|
TJ
|
|
Terajoule, the unit of energy
|
|
|
|
Transfer Agent Agreement
|
|
Agreement about transfer, registrar and dividend disbursement
|
|
|
|
TSMC
|
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
US GAAP
|
|
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
|
|
|
|
VAT
|
|
Value-added tax
|
|
|
|
VLSI
|
|
An independent industry research firm that surveyed customers representing 95.0% of the world’s total semiconductor market
|
|
|
|
Wavelength
|
|
The frequency of light going through projection lenses; the shorter the wavelength, the smaller the line-width and the finer the pattern on the IC
|
|
|
|
Website
|
|
www.asml.com. Information on our website is not incorporated into, and does not form part of this Integrated Report.
|
|
|
|
Works Council
|
|
Works Council of ASML Netherlands B.V.
|
|
|
|
XBRL
|
|
Extensible Business Reporting Language
|
|
|
|
YieldStar
|
|
Advanced wafer metrology system
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
1
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Agreement between ASM Lithography B.V. and Carl Zeiss, dated March 17, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000) 1
|
4.2
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document 2
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 2
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 2
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 2
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 2
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document 2
|
104
|
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) 2
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Certain information omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed separately with the SEC.
|
2.
|
Filed at the SEC herewith.
|
3.
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted because they are both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed
|
1.
|
Definitions; Interpretation
|
2.
|
Releases and Dismissal of Pending Proceedings
|
3.
|
License Grants
|
4.
|
Certain Covenants and Immunities
|
5.
|
Payments
|
6.
|
Warranties and Disclaimers
|
7.
|
Limitation of Liability
|
8.
|
Term And Termination
|
9.
|
Change of Control; Assignment
|
10.
|
Miscellaneous
|
1.
|
Court of Appeal of The Hague, Case No. 200.245.142,
|
2.
|
Court of Appeal of The Hague, Case No. 200.249.089
|
3.
|
Court of Appeal of The Hague, Case No. 200.249.121
|
4.
|
Court of Appeal of The Hague, Case No. 20.250.327
|
5.
|
Court of Appeal of The Hague re incident Zeiss in C/09/553926 [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
6.
|
Court of Appeal of The Hague re incident Zeiss in C/09/552858 [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
7.
|
Court of Appeal of The Hague re incident Zeiss in C/09/550816 [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
8.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/537395
|
9.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/539155
|
10.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/541038
|
11.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/542245
|
12.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/543446
|
13.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/546837
|
14.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/547803
|
15.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/548890
|
16.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/550816
|
17.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/552858
|
18.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/553926
|
19.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/555962
|
20.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/564829
|
21.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/566317
|
22.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/566318
|
23.
|
District Court of The Hague , Case No. C/09/566718
|
24.
|
District Court of The Hague re infringement EP3098835, [Case No. unknown or not yet assigned]
|
25.
|
District Court of The Hague re invalidity EP1837895, [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
26.
|
District Court of The Hague re invalidity EP1667211, [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
27.
|
District Court of The Hague re invalidity EP1672681, [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
28.
|
District Court of The Hague re invalidity EP1860684, [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
29.
|
District Court of The Hague re invalidity EP1760528, [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
30.
|
District Court of The Hague re invalidity EP2278402, [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
31.
|
District Court of Amsterdam, Case No. C/13/629347
|
32.
|
Federal Patent Court (Munich), Case No. 2 Ni 45/17 (EP)
|
33.
|
Federal Patent Court (Munich), Case No. 4 Ni 46/17 (EP) (formerly 2 Ni 46/17 (EP) )
|
34.
|
Higher regional court of Karlsruhe, Case No. 6 U 47/18
|
35.
|
Mannheim District Court, Case No. 7 0 79/17
|
36.
|
Mannheim District Court, Case No. 7 0 155/17, which was branched off as separate proceeding of Case No. 7 0 79/17,
|
37.
|
Mannheim District Court, re infringement EP2645406, [Case Nos. not yet assigned]
|
38.
|
Mannheim District Court re infringement EP2615479, [Case No. not yet assigned]
|
39.
|
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris, 3eme chambre Jere section (17/12180)
|
40.
|
European Commission Case AT. 40601
|
41.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 29) (Heisei30-wa-7874) (Japan)
|
42.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 29) (Heisei29-wa-14297) (Japan)
|
43.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 29) (Heisei29-wa-14357) (Japan)
|
44.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 29) (Heisei29-wa-17476) (Japan)
|
45.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 29) (Heisei29-yo-22032) (Japan)
|
46.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 29) (Heisei29-wa-27578) (Japan)
|
47.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 40) (Heisei29-wa-13532) (Japan)
|
48.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 40) (Heisei29-wa-14298) (Japan)
|
49.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 46) (Heisei29-wa-13535) (Japan)
|
50.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 46) (Heisei29-wa-14356) (Japan)
|
51.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 46) (Heisei29-yo-22050) (Japan)
|
52.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 46) (Heisei29-wa-31146) (Japan)
|
53.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 47) (Heisei29-yo-22033) (Japan)
|
54.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 47) (Heisei29-wa-27577) (Japan)
|
55.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 47) (Heisei29-yo-22051) (Japan)
|
56.
|
Tokyo District Court (Div. 47) (Heisei29-wa-30820) (Japan)
|
57.
|
Japan Patent Office (2017-800133) (Invalidation trial against JP4987301) (Japan)
|
58.
|
Japan Patent Office (2018-800074) (Invalidation trial against JP4987301) (Japan)
|
59.
|
Japan Patent Office (2018-800147) (Invalidation trial against JP4776551) (Japan)
|
60.
|
Japan Patent Office (2018-800150) (Invalidation trial against JP5462739) (Japan)
|
61.
|
International Centre for Dispute Resolution, Case No. 01-18-0002-1823
|
62.
|
USITC, Case No. 337-TA-1059
|
63.
|
USITC, Case No. 337-TA-1128
|
64.
|
USITC, Case No. 337-TA-1129
|
65.
|
USITC, Case No. 337-TA-1137
|
66.
|
N.D. Cal., Case No. 3:18-cv-04403
|
67.
|
N.D. Cal., Case No. 3:18-cv-05592
|
68.
|
N.D. Cal., Case No. 17-mc-80071-BLF-SVK
|
69.
|
N.D. Cal., Case No. 3:18-mc-80051-EDL
|
70.
|
N.D. Cal., Case No. 3:18-mc-80070-EDL
|
71.
|
N.D. Cal., Case No. 3:18-mc-80173-EDL
|
72.
|
C.D. Cal., Case No. 2:17-cv-03221, on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Case No. 2019-1068
|
73.
|
C.D. Cal., Case No. 2:17-cv-03225
|
74.
|
C.D. Cal., Case No. 2:17-cv-07083
|
75.
|
C.D. Cal., Case No. 2:17-cv-07084
|
76.
|
D. Ariz., Case No. 2:17-mc-00035-JJT
|
77.
|
E.D.N.Y., Civil Action No. 2:18-mc-01278-ADS
|
78.
|
PTAB (IPR2018-00220)
|
79.
|
PTAB (IPR2018-00227)
|
80.
|
PTAB (IPR2018-00686)
|
81.
|
PTAB (IPR2018-00687)
|
82.
|
PTAB (IPR2018-00688)
|
83.
|
EPO opposition proceedings re EP1780722 (reference X.15611); oral proceedings are scheduled to take place on Wednesday, October 16, 2019 in Munich.
|
84.
|
EPO Board of Appeal Number T1917/15-3.4.02 (EPO); oral proceedings are scheduled to take place on Wednesday, January 23, 2019 in Munich.
|
85.
|
EPO Board of Appeal Number T1153/15-3.4.02 (EPO); oral proceedings are scheduled to take place on Wednesday, March 13, 2019 in Munich.
|
86.
|
Case No. 4W102506 (China)
|
87.
|
Case No. 4W102505 (China)
|
88.
|
Case No. 4W102507 (China)
|
No.
|
Patent
Registration Number
|
Patent
Application Number
|
Country
|
Title of Invention
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
Application No.
|
Country
|
Publication No.
|
Patent No.
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
[***]
|
|
|
Legal Entity
|
Country of Incorporation
|
|
|
Main subsidiaries of ASML Holding N.V. 1:
|
|
ASML Netherlands B.V.
|
Netherlands (Veldhoven)
|
ASML Systems B.V.
|
Netherlands (Veldhoven)
|
ASML Trading B.V.
|
Netherlands (Veldhoven)
|
ASML Germany GmbH
|
Germany (Dresden)
|
ASML Participations Germany GmbH
|
Germany (Dresden)
|
ASML France S.a.r.l.
|
France (Bernin)
|
ASML (UK) Ltd.
|
UK (Edinburgh (Scotland))
|
ASML Israel Ltd.
|
Israel (Ramat-Gan)
|
ASML Ireland Ltd.
|
Ireland (Dublin)
|
ASML Italy S.r.l.
|
Italy (Avezzano)
|
ASML Hong Kong Ltd.
|
Hong Kong SAR
|
ASML Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
Singapore
|
ASML Korea Co. Ltd.
|
Korea (Kyunggi-Do)
|
ASML Japan Co. Ltd.
|
Japan (Tokyo)
|
ASML (Shanghai) Electrical Equipment Co. Ltd.
|
China (Shanghai)
|
ASML (Shanghai) Lithography Facilities Science and Technology Co. Ltd.
|
China (Shanghai)
|
ASML Taiwan Ltd.
|
Taiwan (Hsinchu)
|
ASML Technology Taiwan Ltd.
|
Taiwan (Hsinchu)
|
ASML Equipment Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
|
Malaysia (Penang)
|
ASML Belgium BVBA
|
Belgium (Turnhout)
|
Brion Technologies (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
|
China (Shenzhen)
|
ASML US, LLC.
|
US (Wilmington, Delaware)
|
ASML Participations U.S. Inc.
|
US (Wilmington, Delaware)
|
Lehrer Pearson, Inc.
|
US (Wilmington, Delaware)
|
Cymer, LLC.
|
US (Reno, Nevada)
|
eLith LLC.
|
US (Wilmington, Delaware)
|
ASML Hong Kong Logistic Services Ltd.
|
Hong Kong SAR
|
ASML Global, Inc.
|
US (Wilmington, Delaware)
|
ASML US, LP.
|
US (Wilmington, Delaware)
|
Cymer B.V.
|
Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
Cymer Japan, Inc.
|
Japan (Tokyo)
|
Cymer Korea, Inc.
|
Korea (Kyunggi-Do)
|
Cymer Singapore Pte Ltd.
|
Singapore
|
Cymer Southeast Asia Ltd.
|
Taiwan (Hsinchu)
|
Cymer Semiconductor Equipment (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
|
China (Shanghai)
|
TCZ, LLC.
|
US (Reno, Nevada)
|
Hermes Microvision, Inc.
|
Taiwan (Hsinchu)
|
Hermes Microvision Singapore Pte. Ltd.
|
Singapore (Singapore)
|
Hermes Microvision Korea Inc.
|
Korea (Kyungki-do)
|
Hermes Microvision Japan Inc.
|
Japan (Tokyo)
|
Hermes Microvision Co., Ltd. (Beijing)
|
China (Beijing)
|
Hermes Microvision, Inc.
|
US (San Jose, California)
|
HMI North America Inc.
|
US (Las Vegas, Nevada)
|
Hermes Microvision (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
|
China (Shanghai)
|
Hermes Microvision Incorporated B.V.
|
Netherlands (Veldhoven)
|
|
|
1.
|
All of our subsidiaries are (directly or indirectly) wholly-owned, with exception of eLith LLC, in which we hold an interest of 50%.
|
1.
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|
2.
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.
|