Item 1. Business
General
Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (“Timberland Bancorp" or the "Company”), a Washington corporation, was organized on September 8, 1997 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for Timberland Bank (the "Bank"). At September 30, 2023, on a consolidated basis, the Company had total assets of $1.84 billion, net loans receivable of $1.30 billion, total deposits of $1.56 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $233.07 million. The Company’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment activities and oversight of its investment in the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including consolidated financial statements and related data, relates primarily to the Bank and its subsidiary, Timberland Service Corp.
The Bank opened for business in 1915 and serves consumers and businesses across Grays Harbor, Pierce, Thurston, King, Kitsap and Lewis counties, Washington with a full range of lending and deposit services through its 23 branches (including its main office in Hoquiam). The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable legal limits by the FDIC. The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System since 1937. The Bank is regulated by the DFI and the FDIC. The Company is regulated by the Federal Reserve.
Timberland Bank is a community-oriented bank which has traditionally offered a variety of savings products to its retail customers while concentrating its lending activities on real estate mortgage loans. Lending activities have been focused primarily on the origination of loans secured by real estate, including residential and commercial / multi-family construction loans, one- to four-family residential loans, multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans and land loans. The Bank originates adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans that do not qualify for sale in the secondary market. The Bank also originates commercial business loans and other consumer loans.
The Company maintains a website at www.timberlandbank.com. The information contained on that website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than an investor’s own internet access charges, the Company makes available free of charge through that website the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials have been electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Market Area
The Bank considers Grays Harbor, Pierce, Thurston, King, Kitsap and Lewis counties, Washington as its primary market areas. The Bank conducts operations from:
•its main office in Hoquiam (Grays Harbor County);
•five branch offices in Grays Harbor County (Ocean Shores, Montesano, Elma and two branches in Aberdeen);
•five branch offices in Pierce County (Edgewood, Puyallup, Spanaway, Tacoma and Gig Harbor);
•six branch offices in Thurston County (Tumwater, Yelm, two branches in Lacey and two branches in Olympia);
•two branch offices in Kitsap County (Poulsbo and Silverdale);
•a branch office in King County (Auburn); and
•three branch offices in Lewis County (Winlock, Toledo and Chehalis).
For additional information, see “Item 2. Properties.”
Hoquiam, with a population of approximately 8,800, is located in Grays Harbor County which is situated along Washington State’s central Pacific coast. Hoquiam is located approximately 110 miles southwest of Seattle, Washington and 145 miles northwest of Portland, Oregon.
The Bank considers its primary market area to include six sub-markets: primarily rural Grays Harbor County with its historical dependence on the timber and fishing industries; Thurston and Kitsap counties with their dependence on state and federal government; Pierce and King counties with their broadly diversified economic bases; and Lewis County with its dependence on retail trade, manufacturing, industrial services and local government. Each of these markets presents operating risks to the Bank. The Bank’s expansion into Pierce, Thurston, Kitsap, King and Lewis counties represents the Bank’s strategy to expand and diversify its primary market area to become less reliant on the economy of Grays Harbor County.
Grays Harbor County has a population of 77,000 according to the United States ("U.S.") Census Bureau 2022 estimates and a median family income of $86,000 according to 2023 estimates from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). The economic base in Grays Harbor County has been historically dependent on the timber and fishing industries. Other industries that support the economic base are tourism, agriculture, shipping, transportation and technology. According to the Washington State Employment Security Department, the unemployment rate in Grays Harbor County decreased to 4.8% at September 30, 2023 from 5.8% at September 30, 2022. The median price of a resale home in Grays Harbor County for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 decreased 1.7% to $351,300 from $357,200 for the comparable prior year period. The number of home sales decreased 4.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same quarter one year earlier. The Bank has six branches (including its home office) located in the county.
Pierce County is the second most populous county in the state and has a population of 927,000 according to the U.S. Census Bureau 2022 estimates. The county’s median family income is $112,600 according to 2023 HUD estimates. The economy in Pierce County is diversified with the presence of military related government employment (Joint Base Lewis-McChord), transportation and shipping employment (Port of Tacoma), and aerospace related employment. According to the Washington State Employment Security Department, the unemployment rate for the Pierce County area decreased to 3.9% at September 30, 2023 from 4.3% at September 30, 2022. The median price of a resale home in Pierce County for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 decreased 1.7% to $545,200 from $554,900 for the comparable prior year period. The number of home sales decreased 10.7% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same quarter one year earlier. The Bank has five branches located in Pierce County, and these branches have historically been responsible for a substantial portion of the Bank’s construction lending activities.
Thurston County has a population of 299,000 according to the U.S. Census Bureau 2022 estimates and a median family income of $102,500 according to 2023 HUD estimates. Thurston County is home of Washington State’s capital (Olympia), and its economic base is largely driven by state government related employment. According to the Washington State Employment Security Department, the unemployment rate for the Thurston County area decreased to 3.4% at September 30, 2023 from 3.8% at September 30, 2022. The median price of a resale home in Thurston County for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 increased 4.7% to $516,300 from $493,000 for the same quarter one year earlier. The number of home sales decreased 7.0% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same quarter one year earlier. The Bank has six branches located in Thurston County. This county has historically had a stable economic base primarily attributable to the state government presence.
Kitsap County has a population of 278,000 according to the U.S. Census Bureau 2022 estimates and a median family income of $113,500 according to 2023 HUD estimates. The Bank has two branches located in Kitsap County. The economic base of Kitsap County is largely supported by military related government employment through the U.S. Navy. According to the Washington State Employment Security Department, the unemployment rate for the Kitsap County area decreased to 3.5% at September 30, 2023 from 3.6% at September 30, 2022. The median price of a resale home in Kitsap County for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 increased 2.0% to $552,700 from $541,600 for the same quarter one year earlier. The number of home sales decreased 7.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same quarter one year earlier.
King County is the most populous county in the state and has a population of 2.3 million according to the U.S. Census Bureau 2022 estimates. The Bank has one branch located in King County. The county’s median family income is $146,500 according to 2023 HUD estimates. King County’s economic base is diversified with many industries including shipping, transportation, aerospace, computer technology and biotech. According to the Washington State Employment Security Department, the unemployment rate for the King County area increased to 3.6% at September 30, 2023 from 2.9% at September 30, 2022. The median price of a resale home in King County for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 increased 1.6% to $908,100 from $893,800 for the same quarter one year earlier. The number of home sales decreased 10.0% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same quarter one year earlier.
Lewis County has a population of 85,000 according to the U.S. Census Bureau 2022 estimates and a median family income of $86,000 according to 2023 HUD estimates. The economic base in Lewis County is supported by manufacturing, retail trade, local government and industrial services. According to the Washington State Employment Security Department, the unemployment rate in Lewis County decreased to 4.3% at September 30, 2023 from 4.7% at September 30, 2022. The median price of a resale home in Lewis County for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 increased 3.6% to $410,900 from $396,500 for the same quarter one year earlier. The number of home sales decreased 9.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same quarter one year earlier. The Bank has three branches located in Lewis County.
Lending Activities
General. Historically, the principal lending activity of the Bank has consisted of the origination of loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences, multi-family properties, commercial real estate, and on raw or developed land, and the origination of construction loans, primarily for the construction of one- to four-family residences. The Bank’s net loans receivable totaled $1.30 billion at September 30, 2023, representing 70.8% of consolidated total assets, and at that date, commercial real estate, construction (including undisbursed loans in process), multi-family and land loans were $996.01 million, or 69.8% of total loans. Commercial real estate, construction, multi-family, and land loans typically have higher rates of return than one- to four-family loans; however, they also present a higher degree of risk.
The Bank’s internal loan policy limits the maximum amount of loans to one borrower to 90% of its legal lending limit (which is 20% of its capital plus surplus). According to the Washington Administrative Code, capital and surplus are defined as a bank's Tier 1 capital, Tier 2 capital and the balance of a bank's allowance for loan losses not included in the bank's Tier 2 capital as reported in the bank's call report. At September 30, 2023, the maximum amount which the Bank could have lent to any one borrower and the borrower’s related entities was approximately $42.31 million under this policy. At September 30, 2023, the largest amount outstanding to any one borrower and the borrower’s related entities was $38.12 million (including $5.28 million in available lines of credit), which was secured by various commercial real estate and residential properties and other business assets located primarily in King and Pierce counties, and these loans were performing according to their repayment terms at September 30, 2023. The next largest amount outstanding to any one borrower and the borrower’s related entities was $33.98 million (including $1.56 million of undisbursed construction loan proceeds). These loans were secured by multi-family, one- to four-family and commercial real estate properties located primarily in Thurston County and were performing according to their repayment terms at September 30, 2023.
Loan Portfolio Analysis. The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At September 30, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | |
| | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent | | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One- to four-family (1) | $ | 253,227 | | | 17.75 | % | | $ | 176,116 | | | 14.05 | % | | $ | 119,935 | | | 11.08 | % | | | | | | | | |
| Multi-family | 127,176 | | | 8.91 | | | 95,025 | | | 7.58 | | | 87,563 | | | 8.09 | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial | 568,265 | | | 39.84 | | | 536,650 | | | 42.81 | | | 470,650 | | | 43.49 | | | | | | | | | |
Construction - custom and owner/builder | 129,699 | | | 9.09 | | | 119,240 | | | 9.51 | | | 109,152 | | | 10.08 | | | | | | | | | |
Construction - speculative one- to four-family | 17,099 | | | 1.20 | | | 12,254 | | | 0.98 | | | 17,813 | | | 1.65 | | | | | | | | | |
Construction - commercial | 51,064 | | | 3.58 | | | 40,364 | | | 3.22 | | | 43,365 | | | 4.01 | | | | | | | | | |
Construction - multi-family | 57,140 | | | 4.01 | | | 64,480 | | | 5.14 | | | 52,071 | | | 4.81 | | | | | | | | | |
Construction - land development | 18,841 | | | 1.32 | | | 19,280 | | | 1.54 | | | 10,804 | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | | | |
| Land | 26,726 | | | 1.87 | | | 26,854 | | | 2.14 | | | 19,936 | | | 1.84 | | | | | | | | | |
Total mortgage loans | 1,249,237 | | | 87.57 | | | 1,090,263 | | | 86.97 | | | 931,289 | | | 86.05 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consumer Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Home equity and second mortgage | 38,281 | | | 2.68 | | | 35,187 | | | 2.81 | | | 32,988 | | | 3.05 | | | | | | | | | |
| Other | 2,772 | | | 0.20 | | | 2,128 | | | 0.17 | | | 2,512 | | | 0.23 | | | | | | | | | |
Total consumer loans | 41,053 | | | 2.88 | | | 37,315 | | | 2.98 | | | 35,500 | | | 3.28 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial business | 135,802 | | | 9.52 | | | 125,039 | | | 9.97 | | | 74,579 | | | 6.89 | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") | 466 | | | 0.03 | | | 1,001 | | | 0.08 | | | 40,922 | | | 3.78 | | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial business and SBA PPP loans | 136,268 | | | 9.55 | | | 126,040 | | | 10.05 | | | 115,501 | | | 10.67 | | | | | | | | | |
| Total loans receivable | 1,426,558 | | | 100.00 | % | | 1,253,618 | | | 100.00 | % | | 1,082,290 | | | 100.00 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Undisbursed portion of construction loans in process | (103,194) | | | | | (103,168) | | | | | (95,224) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred loan origination fees, net | (5,242) | | | | | (4,321) | | | | | (5,143) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | (15,817) | | | | | (13,703) | | | | | (13,469) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total loans receivable, net | $ | 1,302,305 | | | | | $ | 1,132,426 | | | | | $ | 968,454 | | | | | | | | | | | |
___________
(1)Does not include loans held for sale of $400, $748, and $3,217 at September 30, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.
Residential One- to Four-Family Lending. At September 30, 2023, $253.23 million, or 17.8%, of the Bank’s loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by one- to four-family residences. The Bank originates both fixed-rate loans and adjustable-rate loans.
Generally, one- to four-family fixed-rate loans are originated to meet the requirements for sale in the secondary market to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") or the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines ("FHLB"). From time to time, however, a portion of these fixed-rate loans may be retained in the loan portfolio to meet the Bank’s asset/liability management objectives. The Bank uses an automated underwriting program, which preliminarily qualifies a loan as conforming to Freddie Mac underwriting standards when the loan is originated. At September 30, 2023, $110.15 million, or 43.5%, of the Bank’s one- to four-family loan portfolio consisted of fixed-rate mortgage loans.
The Bank also offers adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans. All the Bank’s ARM loans are retained in its loan portfolio. The Bank offers several ARM products which adjust annually or every three to five years after an initial period ranging from one to five years and are typically subject to a limitation on the annual interest rate increase of 2% and an overall limitation of 6%. These ARM products generally are re-priced utilizing the weekly average yield on one-year U.S. Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year plus a margin of 2.75% to 4.00%. The Bank also offers ARM loans tied to the Wall Street Journal prime lending rate ("Prime Rate") index which typically do not have periodic or lifetime adjustment limits. Loans tied to the Prime Rate normally have margins ranging up to 3.0%. ARM loans held in the Bank’s portfolio do not permit negative amortization of principal. Borrower demand for ARM loans versus fixed-rate mortgage loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates and the difference between the initial interest rates and fees charged for each type of loan. The relative amount of fixed-rate mortgage loans and ARM loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment. At September 30, 2023, $143.07 million, or 56.5%, of the Bank’s one- to four- family loan portfolio consisted of ARM loans.
A portion of the Bank’s ARM loans are “non-conforming,” because they do not satisfy acreage limits or various other requirements imposed by Freddie Mac. Some of these loans are also originated to meet the needs of borrowers who cannot otherwise satisfy Freddie Mac credit requirements because of personal and financial reasons (i.e., divorce, bankruptcy, length of time employed, etc.), and other aspects, which do not conform to Freddie Mac’s guidelines. Such borrowers may have higher debt-to-income ratios, or the loans are secured by unique properties in rural markets for which there are no sales of comparable properties to support the value according to secondary market requirements. These loans are known as non-conforming loans, and the Bank may require additional collateral or lower loan-to-value ratios to reduce the risk of these loans. The Bank believes that these loans satisfy a need in its local market area. As a result, subject to market conditions, the Bank intends to continue to originate these types of loans.
The retention of ARM loans in the Bank’s loan portfolio helps reduce the Bank’s exposure to changes in interest rates. There are, however, unquantifiable credit risks resulting from the potential of increased interest to be paid by the customer as a result of increases in interest rates. It is possible that during periods of rising interest rates, the risk of default on ARM loans may increase as a result of repricing and the increased costs to the borrower. The Bank attempts to reduce the potential for delinquencies and defaults on ARM loans by qualifying the borrower based on the borrower’s ability to repay the ARM loan assuming a 2.0% increase in the initial interest rate. Another consideration is that although ARM loans allow the Bank to increase the sensitivity of its asset base due to changes in the interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits. Because of these considerations, the Bank has no assurance that yield increases on ARM loans will be sufficient to offset increases in the Bank’s cost of funds.
While fixed-rate, single-family residential mortgage loans are normally originated with 15 to 30 year terms to maturity, these loans typically remain outstanding for substantially shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan. In addition, substantially all mortgage loans in the Bank’s loan portfolio contain due-on-sale clauses providing that the Bank may declare the unpaid amount due and payable upon the sale of the property securing the loan. Typically, the Bank enforces these due-on-sale clauses to the extent permitted by law and as business judgment dictates. Thus, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates received on outstanding loans.
The Bank requires that fire and extended coverage casualty insurance, and flood insurance if appropriate, be maintained on the collateral for all of its real estate secured loans.
The Bank’s lending policies generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio on mortgage loans secured by owner-occupied properties to 85% of the lesser of the appraised value or the purchase price. However, the Bank usually obtains private mortgage insurance (“PMI”) on the portion of the principal amount that exceeds 80% of the appraised value of the security property. The maximum loan-to-value ratio on mortgage loans secured by non-owner-occupied properties is generally 80%
(90% for loans originated for sale in the secondary market to Freddie Mac or the FHLB). At September 30, 2023, two one- to four-family loans totaling $368,000 were on non-accrual status. See “Lending Activities - Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies.”
Multi-Family Lending. At September 30, 2023, $127.18 million, or 8.9%, of the Bank’s total loan portfolio was secured by multi-family dwelling units (more than four units) located primarily in the Bank’s primary market area. Multi-family loans are generally originated with variable rates of interest ranging from 1.00% to 3.50% over the one-year constant maturity U.S. Treasury Bill Index, the Prime Rate or a matched term FHLB borrowing, with principal and interest payments fully amortizing over terms of up to 30 years. At September 30, 2023, the Bank’s largest multi-family loan had an outstanding principal balance of $10.00 million and was secured by an apartment building located in Thurston County. At September 30, 2023, this loan was performing according to its repayment terms.
The maximum loan-to-value ratio for multi-family loans is generally limited to not more than 80%. The Bank generally requests its multi-family loan borrowers with loan balances in excess of $750,000 to submit financial statements and rent rolls annually on the properties securing such loans. The Bank also inspects such properties annually. The Bank generally imposes a minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.20 for loans secured by multi-family properties.
Multi-family mortgage lending affords the Bank an opportunity to receive interest at rates higher than those generally available from one- to four- family residential lending. However, loans secured by multi-family properties usually are greater in amount, more difficult to evaluate and monitor and, therefore, may involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by multi-family properties are often dependent on the successful operation and management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. The Bank seeks to minimize these risks by scrutinizing the financial condition of the borrower, the quality of the collateral and the management of the property securing the loan. If the borrower is other than an individual, the Bank also generally obtains personal guarantees from the principals (with ownership interests of 20% or more) based on a review of personal financial statements. At September 30, 2023, all multi-family loans were performing according to their repayment terms. See "Lending Activities - Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies."
Commercial Real Estate Lending. Commercial real estate loans totaled $568.27 million, or 39.8%, of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2023. The Bank originates commercial real estate loans generally at variable interest rates with principal and interest payments fully amortizing over terms of up to 30 years. These loans are secured by properties, such as industrial warehouses, medical/dental offices, office buildings, retail/wholesale facilities, mini-storage facilities, hotel/motels, nursing homes, restaurants, convenience stores, shopping centers and mobile home parks, generally located in the Bank’s primary market area. At September 30, 2023, the largest commercial real estate loan was secured by a medical office building in Thurston County, had a balance of $7.75 million and was performing according to its repayment terms. At September 30, 2023, two commercial real estate loans totaling $683,000 were on non-accrual status. See “Lending Activities - Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies.”
The Bank typically requires appraisals of properties securing commercial real estate loans. For loans that are less than $250,000, the Bank may use an evaluation provided by a third-party vendor in lieu of an appraisal. Appraisals are performed by independent appraisers designated by the Bank. The Bank considers the quality and location of the real estate, the credit history of the borrower, the cash flow of the project and the quality of management involved with the property when making these loans. The Bank generally imposes a minimum debt coverage ratio of approximately 1.20 for loans secured by income producing commercial properties. Loan-to-value ratios on commercial real estate loans are generally limited to not more than 80%. If the borrower is other than an individual, the Bank also generally obtains personal guarantees from the principals (with ownership interests of 20% or more) based on a review of personal financial statements.
Commercial real estate lending affords the Bank an opportunity to receive interest at rates higher than those generally available from one- to four-family residential lending. However, loans secured by such properties usually are greater in amount, more difficult to evaluate and monitor and, therefore, involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial properties often depend upon the successful operation and management of the properties, repayment of these loans may be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. The Bank seeks to minimize these risks by generally limiting the maximum loan-to-value ratio to 80% and scrutinizing the financial condition of the borrower, the quality of the collateral and the management of the property securing the loan. The Bank also generally requests annual financial information and rent rolls on the subject property from the borrowers on loans over $750,000.
Construction Lending. The Bank currently originates two types of residential construction loans: (i) custom construction and owner/builder construction loans and (ii) speculative construction loans. The Bank believes that its lengthy experience in providing residential construction loans has enabled it to establish processing and disbursement procedures to
meet the needs of its borrowers while reducing many of the risks inherent with construction lending. The Bank also originates construction loans for commercial properties, multi-family properties, and land development projects. The Bank's construction loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is billed monthly, although during the term of some construction loans, no payment from the borrower is required since the accumulated interest is added to the principal of the loan through an interest reserve. At September 30, 2023, the Bank's construction loans totaled $273.84 million, or 19.2% of the Bank's total loan portfolio, including undisbursed loans in process of $103.19 million. All construction loans were performing according to their repayment terms at September 30, 2023. See "Lending Activities - Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies."
At September 30, 2023 and 2022, the composition of the Bank’s construction loan portfolio was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At September 30, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Balance | | Percent of Total | | Balance | | Percent of Total |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Custom and owner/builder | $ | 129,699 | | | 47.36 | % | | $ | 119,240 | | | 46.65 | % |
| Speculative one- to four-family | 17,099 | | | 6.24 | | | 12,254 | | | 4.79 | |
| Commercial real estate | 51,064 | | | 18.65 | | | 40,364 | | | 15.79 | |
| Multi-family | 57,140 | | | 20.87 | | | 64,480 | | | 25.23 | |
| Land development | 18,841 | | | 6.88 | | | 19,280 | | | 7.54 | |
| Total | $ | 273,843 | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 255,618 | | | 100.00 | % |
Custom and owner/builder construction loans are originated to home owners and are typically converted to or refinanced into permanent loans at the completion of construction. The construction phase of these loans generally lasts up to 12 months with fixed interest rates typically ranging from 4.88% to 10.50% and with loan-to-value ratios of 80% (or up to 95% with PMI) of the appraised estimated value of the completed property. At the completion of construction, the loan is converted to or refinanced into either a fixed-rate mortgage loan, which conforms to secondary market standards, or an ARM loan for retention in the Bank’s portfolio. At September 30, 2023, the largest outstanding custom and owner/builder construction loan had an outstanding balance of $1.18 million (including $502,000 of undisbursed loans in process) and was performing according to its repayment terms.
Speculative one- to four-family construction loans are made to home builders and are termed “speculative” because the home builder does not have, at the time of loan origination, a signed contract with a home buyer who has a commitment for permanent financing with either the Bank or another lender for the finished home. The home buyer may be identified either during or after the construction period, with the risk that the builder will have to debt service the speculative construction loan and pay real estate taxes and other carrying costs of the completed home for a significant time after the completion of construction until the home buyer is identified and a sale is consummated. Rather than originating lines of credit to home builders to construct several homes at once, the Bank generally originates and underwrites a separate loan for each home. Speculative construction loans are generally originated for a term of 12 months, with current rates generally ranging from 6.50% to 9.50%, and with a loan-to-value ratio of no more than 80% of the appraised value of the completed property. At September 30, 2023, the largest aggregate outstanding balance to one borrower for speculative one- to four-family construction loans totaled $3.12 million (including $796,000 of undisbursed loans in process) and was comprised of five loans that were performing according to their repayment terms.
The Bank also provides construction financing for multi-family and commercial properties. At September 30, 2023, these loans amounted to $108.20 million, or 39.5%, of construction loan balances. These loans are typically secured by apartment buildings, condominiums, mini-storage facilities, office buildings, hotels and retail rental space predominantly located in the Bank’s primary market area. At September 30, 2023, the largest outstanding multi-family construction loan was for $8.00 million (including $233,000 of undisbursed loans in process) secured by an apartment building project in Pierce County. At September 30, 2023, the largest outstanding commercial real estate construction loan was secured by a mini-storage facility in Grays Harbor, Washington and had a balance of $7.10 million (including $108,000 of undisbursed loans in process). These loans were performing according to their repayment terms at September 30, 2023.
All construction loans must be approved by a member of one of the Bank’s Loan Committees or the Bank’s Board of Directors, or in the case of one- to four-family construction loans that meet Freddie Mac guidelines, by the Regional Manager of Community Lending, the Loan Department Supervisor or a Bank underwriter. See “Lending Activities - Loan Solicitation and Processing.” Prior to approval of any construction loan application, an independent fee appraiser inspects the site and prepares an appraisal on an "as completed" basis, and the Bank reviews the existing or proposed improvements, identifies the market for the proposed project and analyzes the pro-forma data and assumptions on the project. In the case of a speculative or
custom construction loan, the Bank reviews the experience and expertise of the builder. After this preliminary review, the application is processed, which includes obtaining credit reports, financial statements and tax returns or verification of income on the borrowers and guarantors, an independent appraisal of the project, and any other expert reports necessary to evaluate the proposed project. In the event of cost overruns, the Bank generally requires that the borrower increase the funds available for construction by paying the cost of such overruns directly or by depositing its own funds into a secured savings account, the proceeds of which are used to pay construction costs or to, the extent available, authorizes disbursements from a loan contingency line in the construction budget.
Loan disbursements during the construction period are made to the builder, materials supplier or subcontractor, based on a line item budget. Periodic on-site inspections are made by qualified independent inspectors to document the reasonableness of draw requests. For most builders, the Bank disburses loan funds by providing vouchers to borrowers, which when used by the borrower to purchase supplies are submitted by the supplier to the Bank for payment.
The Bank originates construction loan applications primarily through customer referrals, contacts in the business community and, occasionally, real estate brokers seeking financing for their clients.
Construction lending affords the Bank the opportunity to achieve higher interest rates and fees with shorter terms to maturity than does its single-family permanent mortgage lending. Construction lending, however, is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than single-family permanent mortgage lending, because funds are advanced upon the collateral for the project based on an estimate of the costs that will produce a future value at completion. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation on real property, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total funds required to complete a project and the completed project loan-to-value ratio. With regard to loans originated to builders for speculative projects, changes in the demand, such as for new housing and higher than anticipated building costs, may cause actual results to vary significantly from those estimated. A downturn in the housing or the real estate market could increase loan delinquencies, defaults, and foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. Some builders who have borrowed from us to fund construction projects on a speculative basis have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss.
In addition, during the term of many of our construction loans granted to builders who are building residential units for sale, no payment from the borrower is required since the accumulated interest is added to the principal of the loan through an interest reserve. As a result, these loans often involve the disbursement of funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property or obtain permanent take-out financing, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If our appraisal of the value of a completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project and may incur a loss. Because construction loans require active monitoring of the building process, including cost comparisons and on-site inspections, these loans are more difficult and costly to monitor. Increases in market rates of interest may have a more pronounced effect on construction loans by rapidly increasing the end-purchasers' borrowing costs, thereby reducing the overall demand for the project. Properties under construction are often difficult to sell and typically must be completed in order to be successfully sold which also complicates the process of working out problem construction loans. This may require us to advance additional funds and/or contract with another builder to complete construction. Furthermore, in the case of speculative construction loans, there is an added risk associated with identifying an end-purchaser for the finished project.
The Bank historically originated loans to real estate developers with whom it had established relationships for the purpose of developing residential subdivisions (i.e., installing roads, sewers, water and other utilities) generally with ten to 50 lots. Currently, the Bank is originating land development loans on a limited basis. Land development loans are secured by a lien on the property and typically are made for a period of two to five years with fixed or variable interest rates, with loan-to-value ratios generally not exceeding 75%. Land development loans are generally structured so that the Bank is repaid in full upon the sale by the borrower of approximately 80% of the subdivision lots. In addition, in the case of a corporate borrower, the Bank also generally obtains personal guarantees from corporate principals (with ownership interests in the borrowing entity of 20% or more) and reviews their personal financial statements. Land development loans secured by land under development involve greater risks than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, because these loan funds are advanced upon the predicted future value of the developed property upon completion. If the estimate of the future value proves to be inaccurate, in the event of default and foreclosure, the Bank may be confronted with a property the value of which is insufficient to assure full repayment. The Bank has historically attempted to minimize this risk by generally limiting the maximum loan-to-value ratio on land and land development loans to 75% of the estimated developed value of the secured property.
Land Lending. The Bank originates loans for the acquisition of land upon which the purchaser can then build or make improvements necessary to build or to use for recreational purposes. Land loans originated by the Bank generally have maturities of one to ten years. The largest land loan is secured by land in Grays Harbor County, had an outstanding balance of $1.40 million and was performing according to its repayment terms at September 30, 2023. At September 30, 2023, all land loans were performing according to their repayment terms. See “Lending Activities - Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies.”
Loans secured by undeveloped land or improved lots involve greater risks than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because these loans are more difficult to evaluate. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, in the event of default and foreclosure, the Bank may be confronted with a property the value of which is insufficient to assure full repayment. Land loans also pose additional risk because of the lack of income being produced by the property and potential illiquid nature of the collateral. These risks can be significantly impacted by supply and demand conditions. The Bank attempts to minimize these risks by generally limiting the maximum loan-to-value ratio on land loans to 65%.
Consumer Lending. Consumer loans generally have shorter terms to maturity and may have higher interest rates than mortgage loans. Consumer loans include home equity lines of credit, second mortgage loans, savings account loans, automobile loans, boat loans, motorcycle loans, recreational vehicle loans and unsecured loans. Consumer loans are made with both fixed and variable interest rates and with varying terms.
Home equity lines of credit and second mortgage loans are made for purposes such as the improvement of residential properties, debt consolidation and education expenses, among others.The majority of these loans are made to existing customers and are secured by a first or second mortgage on residential property. The loan-to-value ratio is typically 90% or less, when considering both the first and second mortgage loans. Second mortgage loans typically carry fixed interest rates with a fixed payment over a term between five and 15 years. Home equity lines of credit are generally made at interest rates tied to the Prime Rate. Second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit have greater credit risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans in which the Bank is in the first lien position, because they are generally secured by mortgages subordinated to the existing first mortgage on the property. For those second mortgage loans and home equity lines credit on which the Bank does not hold the existing first mortgage on the property, it is unlikely that the Bank will be successful in recovering all or a portion of the loan balance in the event of default unless the Bank is prepared to repay the first mortgage loan and such repayment and the costs associated with a foreclosure are justified by the value of the property.
Consumer loans entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a deficiency judgment. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans. The Bank believes that these risks are not as prevalent in the case of the Bank’s consumer loan portfolio, because a large percentage of the portfolio consists of second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit that are underwritten in a manner such that they result in credit risk that is substantially similar to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. At September 30, 2023, one consumer loan totaling $177,000 was on non-accrual status. See “Lending Activities - Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies.”
Commercial Business Lending. Commercial business loans (including SBA PPP loans) totaled $136.27 million, or 9.55%, of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2023. Commercial business loans are generally secured by business equipment, accounts receivable, inventory and/or other property and are made at variable rates of interest equal to a negotiated margin above the Prime Rate. The Bank also generally obtains personal guarantees from the principals based on a review of personal financial statements. The largest commercial business loan had an outstanding balance of $3.85 million at September 30, 2023 and was performing according to its repayment terms. At September 30, 2023, five commercial business loans totaling $286,000 were on non-accrual status. See “Lending Activities - Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies.”
The Bank has increased commercial business loan originations made under the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") 7(a) program. Loans made by the Bank under the SBA 7(a) program generally are made to small businesses to provide working capital or to provide funding for the purchase of businesses, real estate, or equipment. These loans generally are secured by a combination of assets that may include equipment, receivables, inventory, business real property, and sometimes a lien on the personal residence of the borrower. The terms of these loans vary by purpose and type of underlying collateral. The loans are primarily underwritten on the basis of the borrower's ability to service the loan from income. Under the SBA 7(a) program, the loans carry an SBA guaranty for up to 75% of the loan. Typical maturities for this type of loan vary but can be up to ten years. SBA 7(a) loans are all adjustable rate loans based on the Prime Rate. Under the SBA 7(a) program, the Bank can
sell in the secondary market the guaranteed portion of its SBA 7(a) loans and retain the related unguaranteed portion of these loans, as well as the servicing on such loans, for which it is paid a fee. The loan servicing spread is generally a minimum of 1.00% on all SBA 7(a) loans. The Bank generally offers SBA 7(a) loans within a range of $50,000 to $1.50 million.
Commercial business lending generally involves greater risk than residential mortgage lending and involves risks that are different from those associated with residential and commercial real estate lending. Real estate lending is generally considered to be collateral based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan to collateral values, and liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral is viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable and/or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of a borrower default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories and equipment may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial business loan depends primarily on the creditworthiness of the borrower (and any guarantors), while liquidation of collateral is a secondary and often insufficient source of repayment.
Loan Maturity. The following table sets forth certain information at September 30, 2023 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing in the Bank’s portfolio based on their contractual terms to maturity but does not include potential prepayments. Loans having no stated maturity and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Within 1 Year | | After 1 Year Through 5 Years | | After 5 Years Through 15 Years | | After 15 Years | | Total |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage loans: | | | | | | | | | |
| One- to four-family | $ | 4,039 | | | $ | 15,205 | | | $ | 87,678 | | | $ | 146,305 | | | $ | 253,227 | |
| Multi-family | 2,856 | | | 21,738 | | | 102,481 | | | 101 | | | 127,176 | |
| Commercial | 16,295 | | | 103,348 | | | 443,371 | | | 5,251 | | | 568,265 | |
Construction (1) | 273,843 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 273,843 | |
| Land | 7,407 | | | 18,256 | | | 917 | | | 146 | | | 26,726 | |
| Consumer loans: | | | | | | | | | |
Home equity and second mortgage | 2,343 | | | 10,341 | | | 24,795 | | | 802 | | | 38,281 | |
| Other | 987 | | | 419 | | | 717 | | | 649 | | | 2,772 | |
| Commercial business | 11,755 | | | 52,618 | | | 56,827 | | | 14,602 | | | 135,802 | |
| SBA PPP | — | | | 466 | | | — | | | — | | | 466 | |
| Total | $ | 319,525 | | | $ | 222,391 | | | $ | 716,786 | | | $ | 167,856 | | | 1,426,558 | |
| Less: | | | | | | | | | |
Undisbursed portion of construction loans in process | | | | | | | | | (103,194) | |
| Deferred loan origination fees, net | | | | | | | | | (5,242) | |
| Allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | | | (15,817) | |
| Total loans receivable, net | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,302,305 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
_____________
(1) Includes $129.70 million of custom and owner/building construction/permanent loans, a portion of which may convert to permanent mortgage loans once construction is completed.
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans due after one year from September 30, 2023, which have fixed interest rates and have floating or adjustable interest rates:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Rates | | Floating or Adjustable Rates | | Total |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage loans: | | | | | |
| One- to four-family | $ | 106,594 | | | $ | 142,594 | | | $ | 249,188 | |
| Multi-family | 51,976 | | | 72,344 | | | 124,320 | |
| Commercial | 216,324 | | | 335,646 | | | 551,970 | |
| | | | | |
| Land | 17,703 | | | 1,616 | | | 19,319 | |
| Consumer loans: | | | | | |
| Home equity and second mortgage | 10,038 | | | 25,900 | | | 35,938 | |
| Other | 1,498 | | | 287 | | | 1,785 | |
| Commercial business | 90,678 | | | 33,369 | | | 124,047 | |
| SBA PPP | 466 | | | — | | | 466 | |
| Total | $ | 495,277 | | | $ | 611,756 | | | $ | 1,107,033 | |
Scheduled contractual principal repayments of loans do not reflect the actual life of these assets. The average life of loans is substantially less than their contractual terms because of prepayments. In addition, due-on-sale clauses on loans generally give the Bank the right to declare loans immediately due and payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells the real property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not repaid. The average life of mortgage loans tends to increase when current mortgage loan interest rates are substantially higher than interest rates on existing mortgage loans and, conversely, decrease when interest rates on existing mortgage loans are substantially higher than current mortgage loan interest rates.
Loan Solicitation and Processing. Loan originations are obtained from a variety of sources, including walk-in customers and referrals from builders and realtors. Upon receipt of a loan application from a prospective borrower, a credit report and other data are obtained to verify specific information relating to the loan applicant’s employment, income and credit standing. An appraisal of the real estate offered as collateral generally is undertaken by a certified appraiser retained by the Bank.
Loan applications are initiated by loan officers and are required to be approved by an authorized loan officer or Bank underwriter, one of the Bank’s Loan Committees or the Bank’s Board of Directors. The Bank’s Consumer Loan Committee consists of several underwriters, each of whom can approve one- to four-family mortgage loans and other consumer loans up to and including the current Freddie Mac single-family limit. Loan officers may also be granted individual approval authority for certain loans up to a maximum of $250,000. The approval authority for individual loan officers is granted on a case by case basis by the Bank's Chief Credit Administrator or Chief Executive Officer. All construction loans must be approved by a member of one of the Bank's Loan Committees or the Bank's Board of Directors, or in the case of one- to four- family construction loans that meet Freddie Mac guidelines, by the Regional Manager of Community Lending, the Loan Department Supervisor or a Bank underwriter, subject to their individual or Loan Committee loan limit. The Bank’s Commercial Loan Committee, which consists of the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Credit Administrator, Executive Vice President of Lending, a commercial underwriter, and the Senior Vice President of Credit Administration, may approve commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans up to and including $3.00 million. The Bank’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Credit Administrator and Executive Vice President of Lending also have individual lending authority for loans up to and including $750,000. The Bank’s Board Loan Committee, which consists of one permanent non-employee Director, one rotating non-employee Director and the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer may approve loans up to and including $5.00 million. Loans in excess of $5.00 million, as well as loans of any amount granted to a single borrower whose aggregate loans exceed $5.00 million, must be approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors.
Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales. During the years ended September 30, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Bank’s total gross loan originations were $361.79 million, $572.46 million and $602.34 million, respectively. Periodically, the Bank purchases loan participation interests in construction, commercial real estate and multi-family loans, secured by properties generally located in Washington State, from other banks. These participation loans are underwritten in accordance with the Bank’s underwriting guidelines and are without recourse to the seller other than for fraud. During the years ended September 30, 2023 and 2022, the Bank did not purchase any loan participation interests. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Bank purchased $9.04 million in loan participation interests.
Consistent with its asset/liability management strategy, the Bank’s policy generally is to retain in its portfolio all ARM loans originated and to sell fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage loans in the secondary market to Freddie Mac; however, from time to time, a portion of fixed-rate loans may be retained in the Bank’s portfolio to meet its asset-liability objectives. The Bank also sells the guaranteed portion of some of its SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market. Loans sold in the secondary market are generally sold on a servicing retained basis. At September 30, 2023, the Bank’s loan servicing portfolio, which is not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, totaled $384.62 million.
The Bank also periodically sells participation interests in construction loans, commercial real estate loans, multi-family and commercial business loans to other lenders. These sales are usually made to avoid concentrations in a particular loan type or concentrations to a particular borrower and to generate fee income. The Bank did not sell loan participations during the year ended September 30, 2023. During the years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, the Bank sold loan participation interests of $14.4 million and $10.0 million , respectively.
The following table shows total loans originated, purchased, sold and repaid during the years indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Loans originated: | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage loans: | | | | | |
| One- to four-family | $ | 45,825 | | | $ | 123,149 | | | $ | 174,379 | |
| Multi-family | 11,158 | | | 8,647 | | | 10,727 | |
| Commercial | 70,117 | | | 127,951 | | | 110,063 | |
| Construction | 174,914 | | | 204,911 | | | 169,284 | |
| Land | 7,144 | | | 19,281 | | | 10,654 | |
| Consumer | 24,160 | | | 27,350 | | | 25,674 | |
| Commercial business loans | 28,470 | | | 61,174 | | | 36,672 | |
| SBA PPP loans | — | | | — | | | 64,891 | |
| Total loans originated | 361,788 | | | 572,463 | | | 602,344 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Loans and loan participations purchased: | | | | | |
| Mortgage loans: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Commercial | — | | | — | | | 3,999 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Commercial business | — | | | — | | | 5,042 | |
| Total loans purchased | — | | | — | | | 9,041 | |
| Total loans originated, acquired and purchased | 361,788 | | | 572,463 | | | 611,385 | |
| Loans sold: | | | | | |
| Loan participation interests sold | — | | | (14,389) | | | (10,000) | |
| Whole loans sold | (11,538) | | | (59,115) | | | (140,202) | |
| Total loans sold | (11,538) | | | (73,504) | | | (150,202) | |
| | | | | |
| Loan principal repayments | (177,310) | | | (324,233) | | | (500,032) | |
| Other items, net | (3,061) | | | (10,754) | | | (6,572) | |
| Net increase (decrease) in loans receivable | $ | 169,879 | | | $ | 163,972 | | | $ | (45,421) | |
Loan Origination Fees. The Bank receives loan origination fees on many of its mortgage loans and commercial business loans. Loan fees are a percentage of the loan which are charged to the borrower for funding the loan. The amount of fees charged by the Bank (excluding SBA PPP loans) is generally up to 2.0% of the loan amount. In addition to the 1.0% interest earned on SBA PPP loans, the Bank earned a fee from the SBA to cover processing costs, which is amortized over the life of the loan and recognized fully at payoff or forgiveness.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") require fees received and certain loan origination costs for originating loans to be deferred and amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the loan. Net deferred fees or costs associated with loans that are prepaid are recognized as income/expense at the time of prepayment. Unamortized net deferred loan origination fees totaled $5.24 million at September 30, 2023.
Non-performing Loans and Delinquencies. The Bank assesses late fees or penalty charges on delinquent loans of approximately 5% of the monthly loan payment amount. A majority of loan payments are due on the first day of the month; however, the borrower is given a 15-day grace period to make the loan payment. When a mortgage loan borrower fails to make a required payment when due, the Bank institutes collection procedures. A notice is mailed to the borrower 16 days after the date the payment was due. Attempts to contact the borrower by telephone generally begin on or before the 30th day of
delinquency. If a satisfactory response is not obtained, continuous follow-up contacts are attempted until the loan has been brought current. Before the 90th day of delinquency, attempts are made to establish (i) the cause of the delinquency, (ii) whether the cause is temporary, (iii) the attitude of the borrower toward repaying the debt, and (iv) a mutually satisfactory arrangement for curing the default.
If the borrower is chronically delinquent and all reasonable means of obtaining payment on time have been exhausted, foreclosure is initiated according to the terms of the security instrument and applicable law. Interest income on loans in foreclosure is reduced by the full amount of accrued and uncollected interest.
When a consumer loan borrower or commercial business borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan by the payment due date, the Bank institutes similar collection procedures as for its mortgage loan borrowers. All loans becoming 90 days or more past due are placed on non-accrual status, with any accrued interest reversed against interest income, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection.
The Bank’s Board of Directors is updated monthly as to the status of loans that are delinquent by more than 30 days and the status of all foreclosed and repossessed property owned by the Bank.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company's non-performing assets at the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At September 30, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | |
| Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis: | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage loans: | | | | | | | | | |
| One- to four-family (1) | $ | 368 | | $ | 388 | | $ | 407 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial | 683 | | 657 | | 773 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Land | — | | 450 | | 683 | | | | |
| Consumer loans | 177 | | 255 | | 533 | | | | |
| Commercial business loans | 286 | | 309 | | 458 | | | | |
| Total | 1,514 | | 2,059 | | 2,854 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more | — | | — | | — | | | | |
| Total of non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans | 1,514 | | 2,059 | | 2,854 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Non-accrual investment securities | 82 | | 106 | | 159 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other real estate owned and other repossessed assets | — | | — | | 157 | | | | |
| Total non-performing assets (2) | $ | 1,596 | | $ | 2,165 | | $ | 3,170 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Troubled debt restructured loans on accrual status (3) | $ | 2,495 | | $ | 2,472 | | $ | 2,371 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans as a percentage of loans receivable, net (4) | 0.11 | % | | 0.18 | % | | 0.29 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans as a percentage of total assets | 0.08 | % | | 0.11 | % | | 0.16 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.09 | % | | 0.12 | % | | 0.18 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Loans receivable, net (4) | $ | 1,318,122 | | $ | 1,146,129 | | $ | 981,923 | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 1,839,905 | | $ | 1,860,508 | | $ | 1,792,180 | | | | |
_______________
(1)Includes non-accrual one- to four-family properties in the process of foreclosure totaling $0, $0,
and $150 as of September 30, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.
(2) Does not include troubled debt restructured loans on accrual status.
(3)Does not include troubled debt restructured loans totaling $0, $142, and $182
recorded as non-accrual loans as of September 30, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(4) Loans receivable, net for purposes of this table includes the deductions for the undisbursed portion of construction loans in process and deferred loan origination fees and does not include the deduction for the allowance for loan losses.
The Bank’s non-accrual loans decreased by $545,000 to $1.51 million at September 30, 2023 from $2.06 million at September 30, 2022, as a result of decreases in non-accrual loans of $450,000 in land loans, $78,000 in consumer loans, $23,000 in commercial business loans, and $20,000 in one- to four-family mortgage loans, partially offset by a $26,000 increase in commercial real estate loans on non-accrual status. A discussion of the Bank's largest non-performing loans is set forth below under “Asset Classification.”
Other Real Estate Owned and Other Repossessed Assets. Real estate acquired by the Bank as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as other real estate owned (“OREO”) until sold. When property is acquired, it is recorded at the estimated fair market value less estimated costs to sell.
Restructured Loans. Under GAAP, the Bank is required to account for certain loan modifications or restructurings as “troubled debt restructurings” or "troubled debt restructured loans." A troubled debt restructured loan ("TDR") is a loan for which the Company, for reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider. Examples of such concessions include but are not limited to: a reduction in the stated interest rate; an extension of the maturity at an interest rate below current market rates; a reduction in the face amount of the debt; a reduction in the accrued interest; or re-amortizations, extensions, deferrals and renewals. TDRs are considered impaired and are individually evaluated for impairment. TDRs are classified as either accrual or non-accrual. TDRs are classified as non-performing loans unless they have been performing in accordance with their modified terms for a period of at least six months. The Bank had TDRs at September 30, 2023 and 2022 totaling $2.49 million and $2.61 million, of which $0 and $143,000, respectively, were on non-accrual status. None of the allowance for loan losses was allocated to TDRs at September 30, 2023 or 2022.
Impaired Loans. In accordance with GAAP, a loan is considered impaired when based on current information and events it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts (principal and interest) when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential mortgage loans and consumer loans, may be collectively evaluated for impairment. When a loan has been identified as being impaired, the amount of the impairment is measured by using discounted cash flows, except when, as an alternative, the current estimated fair value of the collateral, reduced by estimated costs to sell (if applicable), or observable market price is used. The valuation of real estate collateral is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in future periods because of changes in economic conditions. Management considers third-party appraisals, as well as independent fair market value assessments from realtors or persons involved in selling real estate, in determining the estimated fair value of properties. In addition, as certain of these third-party appraisals and independent fair market value assessments are only updated periodically, changes in the values of specific properties may have occurred subsequent to the most recent appraisals. Accordingly, the amounts of any such potential changes and any related adjustments are generally recorded at the time such information is received. When the measurement of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (including accrued interest and net deferred loan origination fees or costs), impairment is recognized by creating or adjusting an allocation of the allowance for loan losses, and uncollected accrued interest is reversed against interest income. If ultimate collection of principal is in doubt, all cash receipts on impaired loans are applied to reduce the principal balance.
The categories of non-accrual loans and impaired loans overlap, although they are not identical. The Bank considers all circumstances regarding the loan and borrower on an individual basis when determining whether an impaired loan should be placed on non-accrual status, such as the financial strength of the borrower, the collateral value, reasons for delay, payment record, the amount past due and the number of days past due. At September 30, 2023, the Bank had $4.00 million in impaired loans. For additional information on impaired loans, see "Note 4-Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report".
Asset Classification. Applicable regulations require that each insured institution review and classify its assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, regulatory examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. Substandard loans are classified as those loans that are inadequately protected by the
current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor, or of the collateral pledged. Assets classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the repayment of the debt. If the weakness or weaknesses are not corrected, there is the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained. Doubtful assets have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified as loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the Bank is not warranted. When the Bank classifies problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, it is required to establish allowances for loan losses in an amount deemed prudent by management. These allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities and the risks associated with problem assets. When the Bank classifies problem assets as loss, it charges off the balance of the asset against the allowance for loan losses. Assets which do not currently expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are designated by the Bank as special mention. Special mention loans are defined as those credits deemed by management to have some potential weakness that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the payment prospects of the loan. Assets in this category are not adversely classified and currently do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant a substandard classification. The Bank’s determination of the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the FDIC and the Division which can require a different classification and the establishment of additional loss allowances.
The aggregate amounts of the Bank’s classified and special mention loans (as determined by the Bank), and the allowance for loan losses at the dates indicated, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At September 30, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Loss | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Doubtful | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Substandard (1) | 6,386 | | | 7,387 | | | 3,604 | |
| Special mention | — | | | 237 | | | 5,012 | |
| Total classified and special mention loans | $ | 6,386 | | | $ | 7,624 | | | $ | 8,616 | |
| Allowance for loan losses | $ | 15,817 | | | $ | 13,703 | | | $ | 13,469 | |
_____________
(1)Includes non-performing loans.
Loans classified as substandard decreased by $1.00 million to $6.39 million at September 30, 2023 from $7.39 million at September 30, 2022. At September 30, 2023, 17 loans were classified as substandard. Of the $6.39 million in loans classified as substandard at September 30, 2023, $1.51 million were on non-accrual status. The largest loan classified as substandard at September 30, 2023 had a balance of $4.73 million and was secured by a commercial real estate property in King County. This loan was not on non-accrual status at September 30, 2023, as the loan was making payments in accordance with its repayment terms and was adequately collateralized. The next largest loan classified as substandard at September 30, 2023 had a balance of $488,000 and was secured by a commercial real estate property in Grays Harbor County. This loan was on non-accrual status at September 30, 2023.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses ("ALL") is maintained to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Bank has established a comprehensive methodology for the determination of provisions for loan losses that takes into consideration the need for an overall general valuation allowance. The Bank’s methodology for assessing the adequacy of its ALL is based on its historic loss experience for various loan segments; adjusted for changes in economic conditions, delinquency rates and other factors. Using these loss estimates, management develops a range of probable loss for each loan category. Certain individual loans for which full collectibility may not be assured are evaluated individually with loss exposure based on estimated discounted cash flows or net realizable collateral values. The total estimated range of loss based on these two components of the analysis is compared to the loan loss allowance balance. When determining the appropriate loss factors in fiscal 2023, management also took into consideration inflation, a potential recession and slowing economic growth, on such factors as the national and state unemployment rates and related trends, consumer spending levels and trends.
In originating loans, the Bank recognizes that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the security for the loan. The Bank increases its ALL by charging provisions for loan losses against the Bank's operating income.
The Board of Directors reviews the adequacy of the ALL at least quarterly based on management's assessment of current economic conditions, past loss and collection experience, and risk characteristics of the loan portfolio.
The Bank’s ALL as a percentage of total loans receivable and as a percentage of non-performing loans was 1.20% and 1,044.72%, at September 30, 2023 and 1.20% and 665.52%, at September 30, 2022, respectively. The $466,000 and $1.0 million of SBA PPP loans were omitted from the foregoing percentages at September 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively, as these loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA.
Based on its comprehensive analysis, management believes that the amount maintained in the ALL is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio. Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make its determinations, future adjustments to the ALL may be necessary, and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations.
While the Bank believes that it has established its existing ALL in accordance with GAAP, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Bank's loan portfolio, will not request the Bank to increase significantly its ALL. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing ALL is adequate or that substantial increases will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate. A further decline in national and local economic conditions, as a result of the effects of inflation, a potential recession or slowing economic growth, among other factors could result in a material increase in the ALL which may adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
An accounting change requiring that we calculate the ALL on the basis of the current expected credit losses over the lifetime of our loans, referred to as the CECL model, became applicable to us, as a smaller reporting company, on October 1, 2023. This will change the current method of providing allowance for credit losses only when they have been incurred and are probable. The adjustment recorded at adoption was not significant to the overall allowance for credit losses ("ACL") or shareholders' equity as compared to the respective balances at September 30, 2023 and consisted of adjustments to the ACL on loans as well as an adjustment to the Company's reserve for unfunded commitments. Subsequent to adoption, the Company will record adjustments to its ACL and reserves for unfunded commitments through the provision for credit losses in the consolidated statement of income.
Credit Ratios
The following table sets forth the ratios between the ALL, non-accrual loans and total loans at the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At September 30, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ALL | $ | 15,817 | | | $ | 13,703 | | | $ | 13,469 | |
| Non-accrual loans | $ | 1,514 | | | $ | 2,059 | | | $ | 2,854 | |
| Loans receivable, net (1) | $ | 1,318,122 | | | $ | 1,146,129 | | | $ | 981,923 | |
| ALL to loans receivable, net | 1.20 | % | | 1.20 | % | | 1.37 | % |
| Non-accrual loans to loans receivable, net | 0.11 | % | | 0.18 | % | | 0.29 | % |
| ALL to non-accrual loans | 1044.72 | % | | 665.52 | % | | 471.93 | % |
________________________________
(1)Loans receivable, net for this table includes the deductions for the undisbursed portion of construction loans in process and net deferred loan origination fees and does not include the deduction for the ALL.
The following table sets forth the ALL by loan category at the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At September 30, | | | | | | | | |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | |
| Amount | | Percent of Loans in Category to Total Loans | | Amount | | Percent of Loans in Category to Total Loans | | Amount | | Percent of Loans in Category to Total Loans | | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One- to four-family | $ | 2,417 | | | 17.75 | % | | $ | 1,658 | | | 14.05 | % | | $ | 1,154 | | | 11.08 | % | | | | | | | | |
| Multi-family | 1,156 | | | 8.91 | | | 855 | | | 7.58 | | | 765 | | | 8.09 | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial | 7,209 | | | 39.84 | | | 6,682 | | | 42.81 | | | 6,813 | | | 43.49 | | | | | | | | | |
| Construction - custom and owner/builder | 750 | | | 9.09 | | | 675 | | | 9.51 | | | 644 | | | 10.08 | | | | | | | | | |
| Construction - speculative one- to four-family | 148 | | | 1.20 | | | 130 | | | 0.98 | | | 188 | | | 1.65 | | | | | | | | | |
| Construction - commercial | 316 | | | 3.58 | | | 343 | | | 3.22 | | | 784 | | | 4.01 | | | | | | | | | |
| Construction - multi-family | 602 | | | 4.01 | | | 447 | | | 5.14 | | | 436 | | | 4.81 | | | | | | | | | |
| Construction - land development | 274 | | | 1.32 | | | 233 | | | 1.54 | | | 124 | | | 1.00 | | | | | | | | | |
| Land | 406 | | | 1.87 | | | 397 | | | 2.14 | | | 470 | | | 1.84 | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-mortgage loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consumer loans | 572 | | | 2.88 | | | 482 | | | 2.98 | | | 578 | | | 3.28 | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial business loans | 1,967 | | | 9.55 | | | 1,801 | | | 10.05 | | | 1,513 | | | 10.67 | | | | | | | | | |
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 15,817 | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 13,703 | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 13,469 | | | 100.00 | % | | | | | | | | |
Analysis of ALL
The table below sets forth the ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| (Net Charge-offs) Recoveries | | Average Loans | | (Net Charge-Offs) Recoveries to Average Loans | | (Net Charge-offs) Recoveries | | Average Loans | | (Net Charge-Offs) Recoveries to Average Loans | | (Net Charge-offs) Recoveries | | Average Loans | | (Net Charge-Offs) Recoveries to Average Loans |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One- to four-family | $ | — | | | $ | 215,854 | | | — | % | | $ | — | | | $ | 140,516 | | | — | % | | $ | — | | | $ | 122,291 | | | — | % |
| Multi-family | — | | | 104,926 | | | — | | | — | | | 88,469 | | | — | | | — | | | 90,569 | | | — | |
| Commercial | — | | | 547,924 | | | — | | | — | | | 513,152 | | | — | | | — | | | 458,631 | | | — | |
| Construction | — | | | 151,149 | | | — | | | — | | | 131,960 | | | — | | | — | | | 121,441 | | | — | |
| Land | — | | | 39,147 | | | — | | | — | | | 31,034 | | | — | | | 45 | | | 23,617 | | | 0.19 | |
| Total mortgage loans | — | | | 1,059,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 905,131 | | | — | | | 45 | | | 816,549 | | | 0.19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consumer Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Home equity | — | | | 37,550 | | | — | | | — | | | 33,418 | | | — | | | — | | | 32,988 | | | — | |
| Other | (3) | | | 2,434 | | | (0.12) | | | (9) | | | 2,369 | | | (0.38) | | | 3 | | | 2,848 | | | 0.11 | |
| Total consumer loans | (3) | | (3) | | 39,984 | | | (0.12) | | | (9) | | (9,000) | | 35,787 | | | (0.38) | | -0.0038 | 3 | | | 35,836 | | | 0.11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial business | (15) | | | 131,117 | | | (0.01) | | | (27) | | | 114,717 | | | (0.02) | | | 7 | | | 174,357 | | | — | |
| Total | $ | (18) | | | $ | 1,230,101 | | | — | % | | $ | (36) | | | $ | 1,055,635 | | | — | % | | $ | 55 | | | $ | 1,026,742 | | | 0.01 | % |
Investment Activities
The investment policies of the Bank are established and monitored by the Board of Directors. The policies are designed primarily to provide and maintain liquidity, to generate a favorable return on investments without incurring undue interest rate and credit risk, and to compliment the Bank’s lending activities. These policies dictate the criteria for classifying investments in debt securities as either available for sale or held to maturity. The policies permit investment in various types of liquid assets permissible under applicable regulations, which include U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies, certificates of deposit of insured banks, federal funds, mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds and mutual funds. The Company's investment policy also permits investment in equity securities in certain financial service companies.
At September 30, 2023, the Bank’s investment portfolio was comprised of investments in debt securities that totaled $311.99 million, consisting of $171.63 million of U.S. government agency securities held to maturity, $96.31 million of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity, $1.79 million of taxable municipal securities held to maturity, $500,000 of bank issued trust preferred securities held to maturity and $41.77 million of mortgage-backed securities available for sale. The Bank does not maintain a trading account for any investments. This compares with a total investment portfolio of $308.02 million at September 30, 2022, consisting of $170.68 million of U.S. government agency securities held to maturity, $93.33 million of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity, $2.10 million of taxable municipal securities held to maturity, $500,000 of bank issued trust preferred securities held to maturity and $41.42 million of mortgage-backed securities available for sale.
The following table sets forth the maturities and weighted average yields of the debt securities in the Bank's portfolio at September 30, 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One Year or Less | | After One to Five Years | | After Five to Ten Years | | After Ten Years |
| | Amount | | Yield | | Amount | | Yield | | Amount | | Yield | | Amount | | Yield |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Held to Maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities | $ | 79,622 | | | 1.27 | % | | $ | 86,942 | | | 1.55 | % | | $ | 5,062 | | | 1.41 | % | | $ | — | | | — | % |
Mortgage-backed securities | 3,992 | | | 6.66 | | | 16,579 | | | 4.58 | | | 4,948 | | | 2.96 | | | 70,786 | | | 3.93 | |
| Taxable municipal securities | — | | | — | | | 1,787 | | | 3.44 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Bank issued trust preferred securities | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 500 | | | 4.75 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available for Sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | 385 | | | 5.75 | | | 2,590 | | | 5.84 | | | 6,642 | | | 5.96 | | | 32,154 | | | 5.36 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total portfolio | $ | 83,999 | | | 1.44 | % | | $ | 107,898 | | | 2.14 | % | | $ | 17,152 | | | 3.72 | % | | $ | 102,940 | | | 4.39 | % |
For additional information regarding investment securities, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Our investment securities portfolio may be negatively impacted by fluctuations in market value and interest rates and result in losses” and "Note 3-Investment Securities of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report".
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits and loan repayments are the major sources of the Bank's funds for lending and other investment purposes. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are influenced significantly by general interest rates and money market conditions. Borrowings through the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ("FRB") may be used to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds from other sources.
Deposit Accounts. Substantially all the Bank's depositors are residents of Washington. Deposits are attracted from within the Bank's market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including money market deposit accounts, checking accounts, regular savings accounts and certificates of deposit. Deposit account terms vary, according to the
minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of its deposit accounts, the Bank considers current market interest rates, profitability to the Bank,
matching deposit and loan products and its customer preferences and concerns. The Bank actively seeks consumer and commercial checking accounts through checking account acquisition marketing programs. The Bank also has checking accounts owned by businesses associated with the marijuana (or Initiative-502) industry in Washington State. It is generally permissible in Washington State to handle accounts associated with this industry in compliance with federal regulatory guidelines. At September 30, 2023, the Bank had $19.51 million, or 1.3% of total deposits, from businesses associated with the marijuana industry. See "Item 1A. Risk Factors - We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and regulations that could increase our costs of operations."
At September 30, 2023, the Bank had $91.71 million of jumbo certificates of deposit of $250,000 or more. The Bank had $59.48 million in reciprocal NOW checking deposits and $11.29 million in reciprocal money market deposits at September 30, 2023. At September 30, 2023, the Bank had $38.16 million in brokered certificates of deposit. The Bank believes that its jumbo certificates of deposit, which represented 5.9% of total deposits at September 30, 2023, present similar interest rate risks as compared to its other deposits.
The following table sets forth information concerning the Bank's deposits at September 30, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Category | | Amount | | Percentage of Total Deposits |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Non-interest bearing demand | | $ | 455,864 | | | 29.21 | % |
| Negotiable order of withdrawal (“NOW”) checking | | 386,730 | | | 24.78 | |
| Savings | | 228,366 | | | 14.63 | |
| Money market | | 189,875 | | | 12.16 | |
| Subtotal | | 1,260,835 | | | 80.78 | |
| | | | |
| Certificates of Deposit (1) | | | | |
| | | | |
| Maturing within 1 year | | 251,737 | | | 16.13 | |
| Maturing after 1 year but within 2 years | | 18,320 | | | 1.17 | |
| Maturing after 2 years but within 5 years | | 30,029 | | | 1.92 | |
| Maturing after 5 years | | 14 | | | — | |
| Total certificates of deposit | | 300,100 | | | 19.22 | |
| Total deposits | | $ | 1,560,935 | | | 100.00 | % |
______________________
(1)Based on remaining maturity of certificates.
The following table indicates the amount of the Bank's jumbo certificates of deposit by time remaining until maturity as of September 30, 2023. Jumbo certificates of deposit have principal balances of $250,000 or more, and the rates paid on these accounts are generally negotiable.
| | | | | | | | |
| Maturity Period | | Amount |
| | | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | |
| Three months or less | | $ | 27,414 | |
| Over three through six months | | 33,559 | |
| Over six through twelve months | | 24,039 | |
| Over twelve months | | 6,702 | |
| Total | | $ | 91,714 | |
As of September 30, 2023, approximately $407.61 million of our deposit portfolio was uninsured. The uninsured amounts are estimates based on the methodologies and assumptions used for the Bank’s regulatory reporting requirements. The Bank is an approved depositor for public funds in Washington. Per the applicable laws, public funds must be secured by qualified investment securities. As of September 30, 2023, $112.10 million of the Bank's uninsured deposits were public funds, all of which were fully secured by qualified investment securities.
The following table sets forth the portion of our time deposits that are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit, by remaining time until maturity, as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands).
| | | | | | | | |
| Maturity Period | | Amount |
| | | (Dollars in thousands) |
| | |
| Three months or less | | $ | 10,164 | |
| Over three through six months | | 25,309 | |
| Over six through twelve months | | 10,539 | |
| Over twelve months | | 3,702 | |
| Total | | $ | 49,714 | |
Deposit Flow. The following table sets forth the balances of deposits in the various types of accounts offered by the Bank at the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At September 30, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Amount | | Percent of Total | | Increase (Decrease) | | Amount | | Percent of Total | | Increase (Decrease) | | Amount | | Percent of Total |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Non-interest-bearing demand | $ | 455,864 | | | 29.21 | % | | $ | (74,194) | | | $ | 530,058 | | | 32.48 | % | | $ | (5,154) | | | $ | 535,212 | | | 34.08 | % |
| NOW checking | 386,730 | | | 24.78 | | | (61,049) | | | 447,779 | | | 27.43 | | | 17,682 | | | 430,097 | | | 27.39 | |
| Savings | 228,366 | | | 14.63 | | | (54,853) | | | 283,219 | | | 17.35 | | | 22,530 | | | 260,689 | | | 16.60 | |
| Money market | 189,875 | | | 12.16 | | | (58,661) | | | 248,536 | | | 15.23 | | | 38,108 | | | 210,428 | | | 13.40 | |
| Certificates of deposit which mature: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Within 1 year | 251,737 | | | 16.13 | | | 175,426 | | | 76,311 | | | 4.68 | | | (5,111) | | | 81,422 | | | 5.18 | |
| After 1 year, but within 2 years | 18,320 | | | 1.17 | | | (4,394) | | | 22,714 | | | 1.39 | | | (3,727) | | | 26,441 | | | 1.68 | |
| After 2 years, but within 5 years | 30,029 | | | 1.92 | | | 6,540 | | | 23,489 | | | 1.44 | | | (2,777) | | | 26,266 | | | 1.67 | |
| Certificates maturing thereafter | 14 | | | — | | | (56) | | | 70 | | | — | | | 70 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | $ | 1,560,935 | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | (71,241) | | | $ | 1,632,176 | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 61,621 | | | $ | 1,570,555 | | | 100.00 | % |
Certificates of Deposit by Rates. The following table sets forth the certificates of deposit in the Bank classified by rates as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At September 30, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| 0.00 - 1.99% | $ | 16,677 | | | $ | 101,070 | | | $ | 108,191 | |
| 2.00 - 3.99% | 92,698 | | | 21,254 | | | 25,678 | |
| 4.00 - 5.99% | 190,725 | | | 260 | | | 260 | |
| Total | $ | 300,100 | | | $ | 122,584 | | | $ | 134,129 | |
Certificates of Deposit by Maturities. The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of certificates of deposit by rate at September 30, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount Due |
| Less Than One Year | | One to Two Years | | After Two to Five Years | | After Five Years | | Total |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| 0.00 - 1.99% | $ | 8,180 | | | $ | 3,162 | | | $ | 5,335 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 16,677 | |
| 2.00 - 3.99% | 73,273 | | | 13,605 | | | 5,806 | | | 14 | | | 92,698 | |
| 4.00 - 5.99% | 170,284 | | | 1,553 | | | 18,888 | | | — | | | 190,725 | |
| Total | $ | 251,737 | | | $ | 18,320 | | | $ | 30,029 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 300,100 | |
Deposit Activities. The following table sets forth the deposit activities of the Bank for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | (Dollars in thousands) |
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,632,176 | | | $ | 1,570,555 | | | $ | 1,358,406 | |
| Net (withdrawals) deposits before interest credited | (82,543) | | | 58,965 | | | 209,136 | |
| Interest credited | 11,302 | | | 2,656 | | | 3,013 | |
| Net (decrease) increase in deposits | (71,241) | | | 61,621 | | | 212,149 | |
| Ending balance | $ | 1,560,935 | | | $ | 1,632,176 | | | $ | 1,570,555 | |
For additional information regarding our deposits, see "Note 10—Deposits of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report".
Borrowings. Deposits and loan repayments are generally the primary source of funds for the Bank's lending and investment activities and for general business purposes. The Bank may use borrowings from the FHLB to supplement its supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The FHLB functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member of the FHLB, the Bank is required to own capital stock in the FHLB and is authorized to apply for borrowings on the security of such stock and certain mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the U.S. government) provided certain creditworthiness standards have been met. Borrowings are made pursuant to several different credit programs. Each credit program has its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of borrowings are based on the financial condition of the member institution and the adequacy of collateral pledged to secure the credit. At September 30, 2023, the Bank maintained a credit facility with the FHLB that provided for immediately available borrowings up to an aggregate amount to 45% of the Bank’s total assets, limited by available collateral, under which long-term borrowings totaling $15.00 million and short-term borrowings totaling $20.00 million were outstanding at September 30, 2023. The Bank maintains two short-term borrowing lines with the FRB with total credit based on eligible collateral: Borrower-in-Custody ("BIC") and Bank Term Funding Program ("BTFP"). At September 30, 2023, the Bank had no outstanding balance on the BIC line, under which $146.26 million was available for future borrowings. At September 30, 2023, the Bank had no outstanding balance on the BTFP line, under which $57.00 million was available for future borrowings. A short-term borrowing line of credit of $50.00 million is also maintained at Pacific Coast Bankers' Bank ("PCBB"). The Bank had no outstanding balance on this borrowing line of credit at September 30, 2023.
For additional information regarding our borrowings, see "Note 11-FHLB Borrowings and Other Borrowings of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report".
Bank Owned Life Insurance
The Bank has purchased life insurance policies covering certain officers. These policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, net of any cash surrender charges. Increases in cash surrender value, net of policy premiums, and proceeds from death benefits are recorded in non-interest income. At September 30, 2023, the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) was $22.97 million.
How We Are Regulated
General. As a bank holding company, Timberland Bancorp is subject to examination and supervision by, and is required to file certain reports with, the Federal Reserve. Timberland Bancorp is also subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC under the federal securities laws. As a state-chartered savings bank, the Bank is subject to regulation and oversight by the Division and the applicable provisions of Washington law and regulations of the Division adopted thereunder. The Bank also is subject to regulation and examination by the FDIC, which insures the deposits of the Bank to the maximum extent permitted by law, and requirements established by the Federal Reserve. State law and regulations govern the Bank's ability to take deposits and pay interest thereon, to make loans on or invest in residential and other real estate, to make consumer loans, to invest in securities, to offer various banking services to its customers and to establish branch offices. Under state law, savings banks in Washington also generally have all the powers that federal savings banks have under federal laws and regulations. The Bank is subject to periodic examination and reporting requirements by and of the Division and the FDIC.
The following is a brief description of certain laws and regulations applicable to Timberland Bancorp and the Bank. Descriptions of laws and regulations here and elsewhere in this report do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual laws and regulations. Legislation is introduced from time to time in the U.S. Congress or the
Washington State Legislature that may affect the operations of Timberland Bancorp and the Bank. In addition, the regulations governing the Company and the Bank may be amended from time to time by the FDIC, DFI, Federal Reserve and the CFPB. Any such legislation or regulatory changes in the future could adversely affect the Company's and the Bank's operations and financial condition. We cannot predict whether any such changes may occur.
The DFI and FDIC have extensive enforcement authority over all Washington state-chartered savings banks, including the Bank. The Federal Reserve has the same type of authority over Timberland Bancorp. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease-and-desist orders and removal orders and initiate injunctive actions. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with the regulators.
Regulation of the Bank
The Bank, as a state-chartered savings bank, is subject to regulation and oversight by the FDIC and the Division extending to all aspects of its operations.
Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to $250,000 per separately insured deposit ownership right or category by the Deposit Insurance Fund (‘DIF”) of the FDIC. As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of, and to require reporting by, FDIC-insured institutions. The FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums quarterly on each FDIC-insured institution applied to its deposit base, which is their average consolidated total assets minus its Tier 1 capital. No institution may pay a dividend if it is in default on its federal deposit insurance assessment. Total base assessment rates currently range from 3 to 30 basis points subject to certain adjustments.
In October 2022, the FDIC finalized a rule that increased the initial base deposit insurance assessment rates by 2 basis points, beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023 (January 1, 2023 through March 31, 2023). The FDIC, as required under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, established a plan in September 2020 to restore the DIF reserve ratio to meet or exceed the statutory minimum of 1.35% within eight years. This plan did not include an increase in the deposit insurance assessment rate. Based on the FDIC’s recent projections, however, the FDIC determined that the DIF reserve ratio is at risk of not reaching the statutory minimum by the statutory deadline of September 30, 2028 without increasing the deposit insurance assessment rates. The increased assessment would improve the likelihood that the DIF reserve ratio would reach the required minimum by the statutory deadline, consistent with the FDIC’s Amended Restoration Plan.The FDIC also concurrently maintained the Designated Reserve Ratio (“DRR”) for the DIF at 2% for 2023. The new assessment rate schedules will remain in effect unless and until the reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2% to support growth in the DIF in progressing toward the FDIC’s long-term goal of a 2% DRR. Progressively lower assessment rate schedules will take effect when the reserve ratio reaches 2%, and again when it reaches 2.5%. The revised assessment rate schedule will remain in effect unless and until the reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2%, absent further action by the FDIC.
In a banking industry emergency, the FDIC may also impose a special assessment. As insurer, the FDIC is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC-insured institutions. The FDIC also may prohibit any insured institution from engaging in any activity the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to the DIF. The FDIC also has the authority to take enforcement actions against banks and savings associations. Management is not aware of any existing circumstances which would result in termination of the Bank's deposit insurance.
Capital Requirements. Federally insured financial institutions, such as the Bank, and their holding companies, are required to maintain a minimum level of regulatory capital. The Bank is subject to capital regulations adopted by the FDIC, which establish minimum required ratios for a common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital to risk-based assets ratio, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio, a total capital to risk-based assets ratio and a Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio. The capital standards require the maintenance of the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a CET1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. Consolidated regulatory capital requirements identical to those applicable to subsidiary banks generally apply to bank holding companies. However, the Federal Reserve has provided a “Small Bank Holding Company” exception to its consolidated capital requirements, and bank holding companies with less than $3.0 billion of consolidated assets are not subject to the consolidated holding company capital requirements unless otherwise directed by the Federal Reserve.
The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (“EGRRCPA”), enacted in May 2018, required the federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, to establish for institutions with assets of less than $10 billion a “community bank leverage ratio” or “CBLR” of between 8 to 10%. Institutions with capital meeting or exceeding the ratio and otherwise complying with the specified requirements (including off-balance sheet exposures of 25% or less of total assets and
trading assets and liabilities of 5% or less of total assets) and electing the alternative framework are considered to comply with the applicable regulatory capital requirements, including the risk-based requirements. The CBLR was established at 9% Tier 1 capital to total average assets, effective January 1, 2020. A qualifying institution may opt in and out of the community bank leverage ratio framework on its quarterly call report. An institution that temporarily ceases to meet any qualifying criteria is provided with a two-quarter grace period to again achieve compliance. Failure to meet the qualifying criteria within the grace period or maintain a leverage ratio of 8% or greater requires the institution to comply with the generally applicable capital requirements. The Bank has not elected to use the CBLR framework as of September 30, 2023.
To be considered well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations, the Bank must maintain a CET1 risk-based ratio of 6.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 8%, a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% and a leverage ratio of 5%, and the Bank must not be subject to an individualized order, directive or agreement under which its primary federal banking regulator requires it to maintain a specific capital level.
In addition to the minimum capital requirements, the Bank must maintain a capital conservation buffer that consists of additional CET1 capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum risk-based capital ratios to avoid limitations on paying dividends, repurchasing shares and paying certain discretionary bonuses. At September 30, 2023, the Bank met the requirements to be "well capitalized," and the Bank's CET1 capital exceeded the required conservation buffer.
For additional information regarding the Bank's regulatory capital requirements, see "Note 17-Regulatory Matters" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
The FASB adopted a new accounting standard for GAAP that is effective as of October 1, 2023. This standard, referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, requires FDIC-insured institutions and their holding companies (banking organizations) to recognize credit losses expected over the life of certain financial assets. CECL covers a broader range of assets than the current method of recognizing credit losses and generally results in earlier recognition of credit losses. Upon adoption of CECL, a banking organization must record a one-time adjustment to its credit loss allowances as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of credit loss allowances under the current methodology and the amount required under CECL. For a banking organization, implementation of CECL is generally likely to reduce retained earnings, and to affect other items, in a manner that reduces its regulatory capital.
The federal banking regulators (the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC) have adopted a rule that gives a banking organization the option to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects of CECL on its regulatory capital.
Prompt Corrective Action. Federal statutes establish a supervisory framework based on five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. An institution’s category depends upon where its capital levels are in relation to relevant capital measures, which include a risk-based capital measure, a leverage ratio capital measure and certain other factors. An institution that is not well capitalized is subject to certain restrictions on brokered deposits, including restrictions on the rates it can offer on its deposits generally. Any institution which is neither well capitalized nor adequately capitalized is considered undercapitalized. The final rule establishing an elective "community bank leverage ratio" regulatory capital framework provides that a qualifying institution whose capital exceeds the CBLR and opts to use the framework will be considered "well capitalized" for purposes of prompt corrective action.
Undercapitalized institutions are subject to certain prompt corrective action requirements, regulatory controls and restrictions which become more extensive as an institution becomes more severely undercapitalized. Failure by an institution to comply with applicable capital requirements would, if unremedied, result in progressively more severe restrictions on its activities and lead to enforcement actions, including, but not limited to, the issuance of a capital directive to ensure the maintenance of required capital levels and, ultimately, the appointment of the FDIC as receiver or conservator. Banking regulators will take prompt corrective action with respect to depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. Additionally, approval of any regulatory application filed for their review may be dependent on compliance with capital requirements.
At September 30, 2023, the Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action regulations of the FDIC. For additional information regarding the Bank's minimum regulatory capital requirements, see "Capital Requirements" above and "Note 17-Regulatory Matters" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. The Bank is a member of the FHLB, one of 11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks that administer the home financing credit function of savings institutions, each serving as a reserve or central bank for its
members within its assigned region. The FHLB is funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB System. It makes loans to members in accordance with policies and procedures, established by the Board of Directors of the FHLB, which are subject to the oversight of the Federal Housing Finance Board. All borrowings from the FHLB are required to be fully secured by sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB. In addition, all long-term borrowings are required to provide funds for residential home financing. See “Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds – Borrowings" above.
As a member, the Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB based on the Bank's asset size and level of borrowings from the FHLB. At September 30, 2023, the Bank had $3.60 million in FHLB stock, which was in compliance with this requirement. The FHLB pays dividends quarterly, and the Bank received $95,000 in dividends during the year ended September 30, 2023.
The Federal Home Loan Banks continue to contribute to low- and moderately-priced housing programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on borrowings targeted for community investment and low- and moderate-income housing projects. These contributions have adversely affected the level of FHLB dividends paid and could continue to do so in the future. These contributions could also have an adverse effect on the value of FHLB stock in the future. A reduction in value of the Bank's FHLB stock may result in a decrease in net income and possibly capital.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Each federal banking agency, including the FDIC, has adopted guidelines establishing general standards relating to internal controls, information and internal audit systems; loan documentation; credit underwriting; interest rate risk exposure; asset growth; asset quality; earnings; and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder. If the FDIC determines that an institution fails to meet any of these guidelines, it may require an institution to submit to the FDIC an acceptable plan to achieve compliance. Management of the Bank is not aware of any conditions relating to these safety and soundness standards which would require submission of a plan of compliance.
Commercial Real Estate Lending Concentrations. The federal banking agencies have issued guidance on sound risk management practices for concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The particular focus is on exposure to commercial real estate loans that are dependent on the cash flow from the real estate held as collateral and that are likely to be sensitive to conditions in the commercial real estate market (as opposed to real estate collateral held as a secondary source of repayment or as an abundance of caution). The purpose of the guidance is not to limit a bank’s commercial real estate lending but to guide banks in developing risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of real estate concentrations. The guidance directs the FDIC and other federal bank regulatory agencies to focus their supervisory resources on institutions that may have significant commercial real estate loan concentration risk. A bank that has experienced rapid growth in commercial real estate lending, has notable exposure to a specific type of commercial real estate loan, or is approaching or exceeding the following supervisory criteria may be identified for further supervisory analysis with respect to real estate concentration risk:
• Total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of the bank’s total regulatory capital; or
• Total commercial real estate loans (as defined in the guidance) represent 300% or more of the bank’s total regulatory capital and the outstanding balance of the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months.
The guidance provides that the strength of an institution’s lending and risk management practices with respect to such concentrations will be taken into account in supervisory guidance on evaluation of capital adequacy. As of September 30, 2023, the Bank’s aggregate recorded loan balances for construction, land development and land loans were 84.08% of regulatory capital. In addition, at September 30, 2023 the Bank’s loans on commercial real estate, as defined by the FDIC, were 289.24% of regulatory capital.
Activities and Investments of Insured State-Chartered Financial Institutions. Federal law generally limits the activities and equity investments of FDIC-insured state-chartered banks to those that are permissible for national banks. An insured state bank is not prohibited from, among other things, (i) acquiring or retaining a majority interest in a subsidiary, (ii) investing as a limited partner in a partnership, the sole purpose of which is direct or indirect investment in the acquisition, rehabilitation or new construction of a qualified housing project, provided that such limited partnership investments may not
exceed 2% of the bank's total assets, (iii) acquiring up to 10% of the voting stock of a company that solely provides or reinsures directors' and officers' liability insurance coverage or bankers' blanket bond group insurance coverage for insured depository institutions, and (iv) acquiring or retaining the voting shares of a depository institution owned by another FDIC-insured institution if certain requirements are met.
Under the laws of Washington State, Washington-chartered savings banks may exercise any of the powers of Washington-chartered commercial banks, national banks and federally-chartered savings banks, subject to the approval of the DFI in certain situations. In addition, Washington-chartered savings banks may charge the maximum interest rate allowable for loans and other extensions of credit by federally-chartered financial institutions to Washington residents.
Environmental Issues Associated With Real Estate Lending. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) is a federal statute that generally imposes strict liability on all prior and present "owners and operators" of sites containing hazardous waste. However, Congress acted to protect secured creditors by providing that the term “owner and operator” excludes a person whose ownership is limited to protecting its security interest in the site. Since the enactment of the CERCLA, this “secured creditor exemption” has been the subject of judicial interpretations which have left open the possibility that lenders could be liable for cleanup costs on contaminated property that they hold as collateral for a loan.
To the extent that legal uncertainty exists in this area, all creditors, including the Bank, that have made loans secured by properties with potentially hazardous waste contamination (such as petroleum contamination) could be subject to liability for cleanup costs, which costs often substantially exceed the value of the collateral property.
Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve requires all depository institutions to maintain reserves at specified levels against their transaction accounts, primarily checking accounts. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective on March 26, 2020, to support lending to households and businesses. At September 30, 2023, the Bank was in compliance with the reserve requirements in place at that time.
Transactions with Affiliates. Timberland Bancorp, Inc. and the Bank are separate and distinct legal entities. The Bank is an affiliate of Timberland Bancorp, Inc. Federal laws strictly limit the ability of banks to engage in certain transactions with their affiliates. Transactions deemed to be a “covered transaction” under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act between a bank and an affiliate are limited to 10% of the bank's capital and surplus and, with respect to all affiliates, to an aggregate of 20% of the bank's capital and surplus. Further, covered transactions that are loans and extensions of credit generally are required to be secured by eligible collateral in specified amounts. Federal law also requires that covered transactions and certain other transactions listed in Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act between a bank and its affiliates be on terms as favorable to the bank as transactions with non-affiliates.
Community Reinvestment Act. Banks are also subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”), which requires the appropriate federal bank regulatory agency to assess a bank’s performance under the CRA in meeting the credit needs of the community serviced by the bank, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agency’s assessment of the bank’s record is made available to the public. Further, a bank’s performance must be considered in connection with a bank’s application to, among other things, establish a new branch office that will accept deposits, relocate an existing office or merge or consolidate with, or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of, a federally regulated financial institution. The Bank received a “satisfactory” rating during its most recent examination.
On October 24, 2023, the federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, issued a final rule designed to strengthen and modernize regulations implementing the CRA. The changes are designed to encourage banks to expand access to credit, investment and banking services in low and moderate income communities, adapt to changes in the banking industry including mobile and internet banking, provide greater clarity and consistency in the application of the CRA regulations and tailor CRA evaluations and data collection to bank size and type. The Bank cannot predict the impact the changes to the CRA will have on its operations at this time.
Dividends. Dividends from the Bank constitute the major source of funds available for dividends which may be paid to Company shareholders. The amount of dividends payable by the Bank to the Company depends upon the Bank's earnings and capital position, and is limited by federal and state laws, regulations and policies. According to Washington law, the Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend on its capital stock if it would cause its net worth to be reduced below (i) the amount required for liquidation accounts or (ii) the net worth requirements, if any, imposed by the Director of the Division. In addition, dividends on the Bank's capital stock may not be paid in an aggregate amount greater than the aggregate retained earnings of the Bank, without the approval of the Director of the Division. Dividends payable by the Bank can be limited or prohibited if the Bank does not meet the capital conservation buffer requirement.
The amount of dividends actually paid during any one period will be strongly affected by the Bank's management policy of maintaining a strong capital position. Federal law further provides that no insured depository institution may pay a cash dividend if it would cause the institution to be “undercapitalized,” as defined in the prompt corrective action regulations. Moreover, the federal bank regulatory agencies also have the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks if such payments should be deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice.
Anti-Money Laundering and Customer Identification. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA Patriot Act) was signed into law on October 26, 2001. The USA PATRIOT Act and the Bank Secrecy Act requires financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts, and, effective in 2018, the beneficial owners of accounts. Bank regulators are directed to consider a holding company’s effectiveness in combating money laundering when ruling on Bank Holding Company Act and Bank Merger Act applications.
Privacy Standards and Cybersecurity. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 modernized the financial services industry by establishing a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms and other financial service providers. Federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have adopted guidelines for establishing information security standards and cybersecurity programs for implementing safeguards under the supervision of the board of directors. These guidelines, along with related regulatory materials, increasingly focus on risk management and processes related to information technology and the use of third parties in the provision of financial services. These regulations require the Bank to disclose its privacy policy, including informing consumers of its information sharing practices and informing consumers of their rights to opt out of certain practices. In addition, Washington and other federal and state cybersecurity and data privacy laws and regulations may expose the Bank to risk and result in certain risk management costs. In addition, on November 18, 2021, the federal banking agencies announced the adoption of a final rule providing for new notification requirements for banking organizations and their service providers for significant cybersecurity incidents. Specifically, the new rule requires a banking organization to notify its primary federal regulator as soon as possible, and no later than 36 hours after, the banking organization determines that a “computer-security incident” rising to the level of a “notification incident” has occurred. Notification is required for incidents that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the viability of a banking organization’s operations, its ability to deliver banking products and services, or the stability of the financial sector. Service providers are required under the rule to notify affected banking organization customers as soon as possible when the provider determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the banking organization’s customers for four or more hours. Compliance with the new rule was required by May 1, 2022. Non-compliance with federal or similar state privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations could lead to substantial regulatory imposed fines and penalties, damages from private causes of action and/or reputational harm.
Further, on July 26, 2023, the SEC adopted final rules that require public companies to promptly disclose material cybersecurity incidents in a Current Report on Form 8-K (“Form 8-K”) and detailed information regarding their cybersecurity risk management and governance on an annual basis in an Annual Report on Form 10-K (Form 10-K”). Companies will be required to report on Form 8-K any cybersecurity incident they determine to be material within four business days of making that determination. Smaller reporting companies, such as the Company, must begin complying with incident reporting on Form 8-K no later than June 15, 2024. Companies must provide the annual disclosures about cybersecurity risk management and governance beginning with their Form 10-K for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2023.
Other Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act") established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve with responsibility for the implementation of federal financial consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations. The Bank is subject to consumer protection regulations issued by the CFPB, but as a smaller financial institution, is generally subject to supervision and enforcement by the FDIC and DFI with respect to its compliance with federal and state consumer financial protection laws and regulations.
The Bank is subject to a broad array of federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations that govern almost every aspect of its business relationships with consumers. While the list set forth below is not exhaustive, these include the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, the Consumer Leasing Act, the Fair Credit Billing Act, the Homeowners Protection Act, the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, laws governing flood insurance, laws governing consumer protections in connection with the sale of insurance, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive business practices, and various
regulations that implement some or all of the foregoing. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans, and providing other services. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations can subject the Bank to various penalties, including but not limited to, enforcement actions, injunctions, fines, civil liability, criminal penalties, punitive damages, and the loss of certain contractual rights.
Regulation of the Company
General. The Company, as the sole shareholder of the Bank, is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve. Bank holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation by the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”), and the regulations promulgated thereunder. This regulation and oversight are generally intended to ensure that the Company limits its activities to those allowed by law and that it operates in a safe and sound manner without endangering the financial health of the Bank.
As a bank holding company, the Company is required to file semi-annual reports with the Federal Reserve and any additional information required by the Federal Reserve and is subject to regular examinations by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve also has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to require that a holding company divest subsidiaries (including its bank subsidiaries). In general, enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
BHCA. The Company is supervised by the Federal Reserve under the BHCA. The Federal Reserve has a policy that a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank and may not conduct its operations in an unsafe or unsound manner. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act and earlier Federal Reserve policy provide that a bank holding company should serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary bank by having the ability to provide financial assistance to its subsidiary bank during periods of financial distress to the bank. A bank holding company’s failure to meet its obligation to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary bank will generally be considered by the Federal Reserve to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of the Federal Reserve’s regulations or both. No regulations have yet been proposed by the Federal Reserve to implement the source of strength provisions required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Timberland Bancorp, Inc. and any subsidiaries that it may control are considered “affiliates” within the meaning of the Federal Reserve Act, and transactions between the Bank and affiliates are subject to numerous restrictions. With some exceptions, Timberland Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries are prohibited from tying the provision of various services, such as extensions of credit, to other services offered by Timberland Bancorp, Inc. or by its affiliates.
Acquisitions. The BHCA prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. Under the BHCA, the Federal Reserve may approve the ownership of shares by a bank holding company in any company, the activities of which the Federal Reserve has determined to be so closely related to the business of banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. These activities include: operating a savings institution, mortgage company, finance company, credit card company or factoring company; performing certain data processing operations; providing certain investment and financial advice; underwriting and acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-related insurance; leasing property on a full-payout, non-operating basis; selling money orders, travelers’ checks and U.S. Savings Bonds; real estate and personal property appraising; providing tax planning and preparation services; and, subject to certain limitations, providing securities brokerage services for customers. The Federal Reserve must approve the acquisition (or acquisition of control) of a bank or other FDIC-insured depository institution by a bank holding company, and the appropriate federal banking regulator must approve a bank’s acquisition (or acquisition of control) of another bank or other FDIC-insured institution.
Acquisition of Control of a Bank Holding Company. Under federal law, a notice or application must be submitted to the appropriate federal banking regulator if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire “control” of a bank holding company. An acquisition of control can occur upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the voting stock of a bank holding company or as otherwise defined by federal regulations. In considering such a notice or application, the Federal Reserve takes into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that acquires control becomes subject to regulation as a bank holding company. Depending on circumstances, a notice or application may be required to be filed with appropriate state banking regulators and may be subject to their approval or non-objection.
Dividends. Federal Reserve policy limits the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the Federal Reserve's view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the company's net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the
company's capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition, and that it is inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Under Washington corporate law, the Company generally may not pay dividends if after that payment it would not be able to pay its liabilities as they become due in the usual course of business, or its total assets would be less than its total liabilities. The capital conservation buffer requirement can also limit dividends.
Stock Repurchases. Bank holding companies, except for certain “well-capitalized” and highly rated bank holding companies, are required to give the Federal Reserve prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of their consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve may disapprove a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve order, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve.
Capital Requirements. As discussed above, pursuant to the “Small Bank Holding Company” exception, effective August 30, 2018, bank holding companies with less than $3.00 billion in consolidated assets were generally no longer subject to the Federal Reserve’s capital regulations, which are generally the same as the capital regulations applicable to the Bank. At the time of this change, Timberland Bancorp, Inc. was considered “well capitalized” as defined for a bank holding company with a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or more and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or more, and was not subject to an individualized order, directive or agreement under which the Federal Reserve requires it to maintain a specific capital level. If the Company were subject to regulatory guidelines for bank holding companies with $3.00 billion or more in assets, at September 30, 2023, the Company would have exceeded all regulatory requirements.
For additional information, see "Note 17-Regulatory Matters" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
Federal Securities Laws. Timberland Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). The Company is subject to information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Exchange Act.
Taxation
Federal Taxation
General. The Company and the Bank report their operations on a fiscal year basis using the accrual method of accounting and are subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Bank or the Company.
Dividends-Received Deduction. The Company may exclude from its income 100.0% of dividends received from the Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations. The corporate dividends-received deduction is generally 50.0% in the case of dividends received from unaffiliated corporations with which the Company and the Bank will not file a consolidated tax return, except that if the Company or the Bank owns more than 20.0% and less than 80% of the stock of a corporation distributing a dividend, then 65.0% of any dividends received may be deducted.
Audits. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examination by tax authorities for years ended on or before September 30, 2019.
For additional information regarding our federal income taxes, see "Note 13-Income Taxes" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report.
Washington Taxation
The Company and the Bank are subject to a business and occupation tax imposed under Washington law at the rate of 1.8% of gross receipts at September 30, 2023. In addition, various municipalities also assess business and occupation taxes at differing rates. Interest received on loans secured by mortgages or deeds of trust on residential properties, certain residential mortgage-backed securities, and certain U.S. government and agency securities is not subject to this tax.
Competition
The Bank operates in an intensely competitive market for the attraction of deposits and in the origination of loans. The Bank competes for loans and deposits with other commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions, mortgage bankers and other providers of financial services, including finance companies, online-only banks, mutual funds, insurance companies, and more recently with financial technology companies that rely on technology to provide financial services. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do. Particularly in times of high or rising interest rates, the Bank also faces significant competition for investor's funds from short-term money market securities and other corporate and government securities. The Bank competes for loans principally through the range and quality of services we provide, interest rates and loan fees, and robust delivery channels for our products and services. The Bank actively solicits deposit-related clients and competes for deposits by offering depositors a variety of savings accounts, checking accounts, cash management and other services.
Subsidiary Activities
The Company has one wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank. The Bank has one wholly-owned direct subsidiary, Timberland Service Corp. (“Timberland Service”), whose primary function is to provide escrow services.
Employees and Human Capital Resources
As part of our commitment to transparency and excellence, we are pleased to share an overview of the Company’s human capital strategies and achievements. Our emphasis on nurturing a dynamic, engaged, and resilient workforce remains pivotal to our success. Our efforts encapsulate our commitment to fostering a robust and engaged workforce, highlighting our focus on talent, well-being, development, and strategic alignment. We are proud of the progress made in enhancing our human capital, recognizing it as a fundamental driver of the Company’s sustained growth. These initiatives collectively underscore our commitment to fostering a workforce deeply connected to the needs and values of our community. We're dedicated to continued growth, guided by the principles of service, integrity, and community stewardship.
Workforce Representation. As of September 30, 2023, the Company had 285 full-time employees and 13 part-time and on-call employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit, and the Company believes that its relationship with its employees is positive. We believe that our ability to attract and retain employees is a key to our success. Accordingly, we strive to offer competitive salaries and employee benefits to all employees and monitor salaries in our market areas. The average tenure of our employees was 7.9 years as of September 30, 2023. Our workforce was 80% female and 20% male, and women held 81% of the Company’s management roles (including department supervisors and managers, as well as executive leadership). The average tenure of management was 14.8 years. The ethnicity of our workforce was 80% White, 8% Hispanic or Latinx, 4% Asian, 3% two or more races, 2% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 2% African American or Black and 1% American Indian or Alaska Native. The Company's board of directors is comprised of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and seven non-employee directors, including four directors who identified as female and one who identified as a member of a minority community.
Talent Acquisition and Attrition. Strategic talent acquisition efforts have expanded our workforce with diverse skill sets aligned with our strategic goals. We continue to manage attrition rates and showcase a retention-centric approach in working with our leaders, ensuring stability within our talented teams. Our recruitment strategy emphasizes local talent acquisition and continues to result in bolstering our teams with individuals deeply rooted in the communities the Company serves. The Company continues to evolve its strategy of promoting diversity through the posting of open positions to diverse job sites. The Company observes a fair and equitable application process for positions that are advertised both internally and externally.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (“DEI”). The Company recognizes the importance of acknowledging our employees’ unique identities, perspectives and contributions. In 2023, Timberland chose to adopt a formal program that fosters an environment that provides all employees with equitable access to opportunities for growth and development and a workforce that reflects the communities we serve. Our Human Resources Director and our DEI Officer oversee the program scope of education/training, recruitment, and hiring practices. Training programs such as unconscious bias training for hiring managers, DEI online training for all employees of the Company and a newly implemented Employee Resource Group (“ERG”) focuses efforts on equity, fairness, and inclusivity of employee engagement throughout the organization’s workforce.
Benefits. The Company provides competitive comprehensive benefits to our employees. Our commitment to ensuring a safe, healthy workplace has been unwavering, with proactive measures to safeguard our employees' well-being. Benefit
programs available to eligible employees may include 401(k) savings plan, employee stock ownership plan, health and life insurance, health savings accounts and flexible spending accounts, employee assistance program, paid holidays, paid time off, paid volunteer time, paid time off for the employee’s birthday and other leave as applicable. The Company promotes wellness initiatives through DEI and benefits administration to all employees that focuses on self-care, nutrition, work life balance, and financial education. Sustained focus on employee health and safety underscores our commitment to a secure workplace.
Total Rewards (Compensation and Benefits). Our commitment to providing competitive and equitable total rewards packages reinforces our employees' dedication and contributions. We're proud to provide competitive and meaningful total rewards, acknowledging the contributions of our employees through our transparency of wage and benefit information of posted positions, 401(k), employee stock ownership plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, profit sharing for eligible employees, annual performance based merit increases, semi-annual performance reviews, organizational celebrations, employee wellness campaigns, recognition events, and career development opportunities within the organization.
Employee Engagement and Training. Our community-focused approach has significantly boosted employee engagement, fostering a sense of belonging and purpose. The Company’s strategy is to create long term, productive relationships through developmental growth with its employees. The Company offers ongoing training to employees throughout their career with the Company. A combination of delivery methods for both regulatory and professional development training is used. Modalities include third-party training, in-house training, and computer system based training for employees to engage in education. Managers and supervisors are offered monthly training on a variety of management areas, including performance coaching and development of employees. This training is created and facilitated in-house and offered virtually. The Company also recognizes the value of allowing employees to shadow and observe other areas of the Company to promote career development. Currently, all Company employees receive two performance reviews each year. In 2023, the Company participated in an Employee Climate Survey. Results from the survey have been reviewed and additional engagement strategies will continue to be developed based on the survey findings. The Company’s culture is one that values integrity, honesty, hard work, and community. Employees are free to voice their ideas and supported in their attempts to better themselves professionally and improve the organization. The Company offers an employee referral incentive to attract new talent to the organization. New employees receive a formal 90 day assessment at the completion of their probationary period. Employees are eligible for increased vacation leave accruals based on time in service at the Company. Employees receive recognition through several metrics based on performance, time in service, process improvements and efficiencies.
Talent Development and Succession Planning. The Company recognizes that the skills and knowledge of its employees are critical to the success of the organization, and promotes training and continuing education as an ongoing function for employees. The Company’s compliance training program provides annual training courses to help ensure that all employees and officers know the rules applicable to their jobs. Additional training and testing programs are offered to employees of certain job positions within the Company to promote and recognize advancement of skill and mastery within the position. Employees are encouraged to attend external education opportunities in the form of training, conferences, and networking events. Internal, robust talent development programs cater to the unique needs of our employees, ensuring their growth aligns with our organizational values. Succession planning initiatives and specific training programs ensure a pipeline of skilled individuals prepared to lead the Company into the future.
Volunteerism. The Company embraces social responsibility, our workforce actively participates in volunteer initiatives, positively impacting our communities. Volunteerism remains a cornerstone of our culture, reflecting our commitment to giving back. The Company offers 20 hours of paid time each year for eligible employees to volunteer at non-profit organizations within the Company’s geographic footprint, benefiting the communities Timberland serves.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company and the Bank:
Executive Officers of the Company and Bank
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Age at September 30, 2023 | | Position |
| Name | | | Company | | Bank |
| Dean J. Brydon | | 56 | | Chief Executive Officer | | Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | | | | |
| Jonathan A. Fischer | | 49 | | President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary | | President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary |
| | | | | | |
| Marci A. Basich | | 54 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | | | |
| Matthew J. DeBord | | 43 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer | | Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer |
| | | | | | |
| Edward C. Foster | | 66 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Administrator | | Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Administrator |
| | | | | | |
| Breanne D. Antich | | 40 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer | | Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
| | | | | | |
Biographical Information.
Dean J. Brydon has been affiliated with the Bank since 1994 and has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and the Company since February 1, 2023. Prior to his promotion to Chief Executive Officer Mr. Brydon served as President of the Bank and Company from January 2022 to January 2023. Mr. Brydon also served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank from January 2000 to January 2023. Mr. Brydon also served as Secretary of the Company and the Bank from January 2004 to January 2022. Mr. Brydon is a Certified Public Accountant.
Jonathan A. Fischer has been affiliated with the Bank since October 1997 and was promoted to President of the Bank and the Company on February 1, 2023. Mr. Fischer has served as Chief Operating Officer since August 23, 2012 and as Secretary of the Bank and the Company since January 2022. Prior to that, Mr. Fischer had served as the Compliance Officer from January 2000 to October 2012 and the Chief Risk Officer from October 2010 to January 2014.
Marci A. Basich has been affiliated with the Bank since 1999 and was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank and Company on February 1, 2023. Previously Ms. Basich served as Treasurer of the Bank and Company from January 2002 to January 2023. Ms. Basich is a Certified Public Accountant.
Matthew J. DeBord has been affiliated with the Bank since 2012 and was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer on April 1, 2023. Prior to being promoted to Chief Lending Officer, Mr. DeBord served as a Commercial Loan Officer and Commercial Lending Team Leader. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. DeBord was employed by a national bank as a Commercial Resolution Officer from January 2010 to December 2012. Mr. DeBord was a Vice President and Portfolio Manager with a local Savings Bank from April 2006 to January 2010 and was employed by Washington State Department of Financial Institutions - Division of Banks as a Financial Examiner from June of 2003 to April 2006.
Edward C. Foster has been affiliated with the Bank and has served as Chief Credit Administrator since February 2012. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Foster was employed by the FDIC, where he served as a Loan Review Specialist from January 2011 to February 2012. Mr. Foster owned a credit administration consulting business from February 2010 to January 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Foster served as the Chief Credit Officer for Carson River Community Bank from April 2008 through February 2010.
Breanne D. Antich, has been affiliated with the Bank since 2007 and was promoted to Chief Technology Officer on January 25, 2022 and was promoted to Executive Vice President on February 1, 2023. Prior to this Ms. Antich served as our Information Technology Manager.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We assume and manage a certain degree of risk in order to conduct our business. In addition to the risk factors described below, other risks and uncertainties not specifically mentioned, or that are currently known to, or deemed to be immaterial by management, also may materially and adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks described below together with all the other information included in this Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC. If any of the circumstances described in the following risk factors actually occur to a significant degree, the value of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.
Risks Related to Economic Conditions
Our business may be adversely affected by downturns in the national economy and in the economies in our market areas.
Substantially all our loans are to businesses and individuals in the state of Washington. A return of recessionary conditions or adverse economic conditions in our local market areas of Grays Harbor, Pierce, Thurston, King, Kitsap and Lewis counties Washington, which we consider to be our primary market area, may reduce our rate of growth, affect our customers' ability to repay loans and adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. General economic conditions, including inflation, unemployment and money supply fluctuations, also may adversely affect our profitability. Weakness in the global economy and global supply chain issues have adversely affected many businesses operating in our markets that are dependent upon international trade. Changes in agreements or relationships between the United States and other countries may also affect these businesses.
A deterioration in economic conditions in the market areas we serve as a result of inflation, a recession, the effects of COVID-19 variants or other factors could result in the following consequences, any of which could have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations:
•loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures may increase;
•we may increase our allowance for loan losses;
•the sale of foreclosed assets may slow;
•demand for our products and services may decline possibly resulting in a decrease in our total loans, total deposits, or assets;
•collateral for loans made may decline in value, exposing us to increased risk loans, reducing customers’ borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with existing loans;
•the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us; and
•the amount of our low-cost or non-interest bearing deposits may decrease and the composition of our deposits may be adversely affected.
A decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on our earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of larger financial institutions whose real estate loans are geographically diverse. Many of the loans in our portfolio are secured by real estate. Deterioration in the real estate markets where collateral for a mortgage loan is located could negatively affect the borrower's ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral securing the loan. Real estate values are affected by various other factors, including changes in general or regional economic conditions, government rules or policies and natural disasters such as fires and earthquakes. If we are required to liquidate a significant amount of collateral during a period of reduced real estate values, our financial condition and profitability could be adversely affected.
External economic factors, such as changes in monetary policy and inflation and deflation, may have an adverse effect on our business financial conditions and results of operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Inflation has risen sharply since the end of 2021 and throughout 2022 at levels not seen for over 40 years. Inflationary pressures, while dissipating, remained elevated throughout the first half of 2023. The annual inflation rate in the United States decreased to 3.7% in September 2023 from its high of 7.0% in December 2021, as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Small to medium-sized businesses may be
impacted more during periods of high inflation as they are not able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, the ability of our business customers to repay their loans may deteriorate, and in some cases this deterioration may occur quickly, which would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to the Company to increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Virtually all our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates tend to have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or by the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services.
The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could continue to affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted the global and national economy and certain industries and geographies in which our clients operate. Given its ongoing and dynamic nature, it is difficult to predict the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business of the Company, its clients, employees and third-party service providers. The extent of such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain. Additionally, the responses of various governmental and nongovernmental authorities and consumers to the pandemic may have material long-term effects on the Company and its clients which are difficult to quantify in the near-term or long-term.
Given the ongoing dynamic nature of variants of COVID-19, it is difficult to predict the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak on our business. As the result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related adverse local and national economic consequences, we could be subject to any number of risks, which could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, ability to execute our growth strategy, and ability to pay dividends. These risks include, but are not limited to, changes in demand for our products and services; increased loan losses or other impairments in our loan portfolios and increases in our allowance for loan losses; a decline in collateral for our loans, especially real estate; unanticipated unavailability of employees; increased cyber security risks as employees work remotely; a prolonged weakness in economic conditions resulting in a reduction of future projected earnings could necessitate a valuation allowance against our current outstanding deferred tax assets; a triggering event leading to impairment testing on our goodwill or core deposit and customer relationships intangibles, which could result in an impairment charge; and increased costs as the Company and our regulators, customers and vendors adapt to evolving pandemic conditions.
Risks Related to our Lending Activities
Our real estate construction and land loans expose us to significant risks.
We specialize in real estate construction loans for individuals and builders, mainly focusing on residential property development. Our loans are initiated regardless of whether the property used as collateral is under a sales contract. As of September 30, 2023, our construction loans totaled $273.84 million, comprising 19.2% of our overall loan portfolio. These were allocated as follows: $203.94 million for residential real estate projects, $51.06 million for commercial projects, and $18.84 million for land development. Comparatively, this marked a 7.1% increase from the previous year, where construction loans accounted for $255.62 million or 20.4% of our total loan portfolio as of September 30, 2022. Notably, approximately $129.70 million of our residential construction loans are structured to convert into permanent loans upon construction completion.
Construction lending involves inherent risks due to estimating costs in relation to project values. Uncertainties in construction costs, market value, and regulatory impacts make accurately evaluating total project funds and loan-to-value ratios challenging. Factors like shifts in housing demand and unexpected building costs can significantly deviate actual results from estimates. Additionally, this type of lending often involves higher principal amounts and might be concentrated among a few builders. A downturn in housing or real estate markets could escalate delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures, and compromise collateral value.
Some builders have multiple outstanding loans, meaning problems with one loan pose a substantial risk to us. Moreover, certain construction loans do not require borrower payments during the term, accumulating interest into the principal. Thus, repayment depends heavily on project success and the borrower's ability to sell, lease, or secure permanent financing, rather than their ability to repay principal and interest directly.
Misjudging a project's value could leave us with inadequate security and potential losses upon completion. Actively monitoring construction loans, involving cost comparisons and on-site inspections, adds complexity and cost. Market interest rate hikes also might significantly impact construction loans, affecting end-purchaser borrowing costs, potentially reducing demand or the homeowner's ability to finance the completed home. Further, properties under construction are hard to sell and
often need completion for successful sales, complicating problem loan resolution. This might require additional funds or engaging another builder, incurring additional costs and market risks.
Moreover, speculative construction loans pose additional risks, especially regarding finding end-purchasers for finished projects. As of September 30, 2023, $17.10 million of our construction portfolio consisted of speculative one- to four-family construction loans.
We also offer land loans for land acquisition, which can be used for building or recreational purposes. As of September 30, 2023, land loans accounted for $26.73 million, or 1.9% of our total loan portfolio. However, loans for land development or future construction carry additional risks due to longer development periods, vulnerability to real estate value declines, economic fluctuations delaying projects, political changes affecting land use, and the collateral's illiquid nature. During this extended financing-to-completion period, the collateral often generates no cash flow.
Although as of September 30, 2023, all construction and land loans were performing according to their terms, a significant rise in non-performing construction or land loans could materially impact our financial status and operations.
Our emphasis on commercial real estate lending may expose us to increased lending risks.
Our current business strategy includes an emphasis on commercial real estate lending. This type of lending activity, while potentially more profitable than single-family residential lending, is generally more sensitive to regional and local economic conditions, making loss levels more difficult to predict. Collateral evaluation and financial statement analysis in these types of loans requires a more detailed analysis at the time of loan underwriting and on an ongoing basis. In our primary market of western Washington, a downturn in the real estate market could increase loan delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. Many of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss.
At September 30, 2023, we had $568.27 million of commercial real estate mortgage loans, representing 39.8% of our total loan portfolio. These loans typically involve higher principal amounts than other types of loans, and repayment is dependent upon income generated, or expected to be generated, by the property securing the loan in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service, which may be adversely affected by changes in the economy or local market conditions. For example, if the cash flow from the borrower’s project is reduced as a result of leases not being obtained or renewed, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Commercial real estate loans also expose a lender to greater credit risk than loans secured by residential real estate, because the collateral securing these loans typically cannot be sold as easily as residential real estate. In addition, many of our commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and contain large balloon payments upon maturity. Such balloon payments may require the borrower to either sell or refinance the underlying property in order to make the payment, which may increase the risk of default or non-payment.
A secondary market for most types of commercial real estate loans is not readily liquid, so we have less opportunity to mitigate credit risk by selling part or all our interest in these loans. As a result of these characteristics, if we foreclose on a commercial real estate loan, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral. Accordingly, charge-offs on commercial real estate loans may be larger as a percentage of the total principal outstanding than those incurred with our residential or consumer loan portfolios.
The level of our commercial real estate loan portfolio may subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny.
The FDIC, the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have promulgated joint guidance on sound risk management practices for financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Under this guidance, a financial institution that, like us, is actively involved in commercial real estate lending should perform a risk assessment to identify concentrations. A financial institution may have a concentration in commercial real estate lending if, among other factors (i) total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of total capital, or (ii) total reported loans secured by multi-family and non-farm non-residential properties, loans for construction, land development and other land, and loans otherwise sensitive to the general commercial real estate market, including loans to commercial real estate related entities, represent 300% or more of total capital. The particular focus of the guidance is on exposure to commercial real estate loans that are dependent on the cash flow from the real estate held as collateral and that are likely to be at greater risk to conditions in the commercial real estate market (as opposed to real estate collateral held as a secondary source of repayment or as an abundance of caution). The purpose of the guidance is to guide banks in developing
risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of real estate concentrations. The guidance states that management should employ heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing. We have concluded that we have a concentration in commercial real estate lending because our balance in commercial real estate loans (including owner-occupied loans) at September 30, 2023 represents more than 300% of total capital. While we believe that we have implemented policies and procedures with respect to our commercial real estate loan portfolio consistent with this guidance, bank regulators could require us to implement additional policies and procedures consistent with their interpretation of the guidance that may result in additional costs to us.
Repayment of our commercial business loans is often dependent on the cash flows of the borrower, which may be unpredictable, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value.
At September 30, 2023, we had $136.3 million, or 9.6%, of total loans in commercial business loans. Commercial business lending involves risks that are different from those associated with residential and commercial real estate lending. Real estate lending is generally considered to be collateral based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan to collateral values and liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral being viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. Commercial business loans are primarily made based on the cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The borrowers' cash flow may be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things.
Our business may be adversely affected by credit risk associated with residential property.
At September 30, 2023, $291.5 million, or 20.4% of our total loan portfolio was secured by one- to four-family mortgage loans and home equity loans. This type of lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impact the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. Higher market interest rates, recessionary conditions or declines in the volume of single-family real estate and/or the sales prices as well as elevated unemployment rates may result in higher than expected loan delinquencies or problem assets, and a decline in demand for our products and services. These potential negative events may cause us to incur losses, adversely affect our capital and liquidity and damage our financial condition and business operations. Further, a decline in residential real estate values resulting from a downturn in the Washington housing market may reduce the value of the real estate collateral securing these types of loans and increase our risk of loss if borrowers default on their loans.
Many of our residential mortgage loans are secured by properties in which the borrowers have little or no equity because either we originated the loan with a relatively high combined loan-to-value ratio or because of the decline in home values in our market areas subsequent to when the loans were originated. Residential loans with combined higher loan-to-value ratios will be more sensitive to declining property values than those with lower combined loan-to-value ratios and therefore may experience a higher incidence of default and severity of losses. In addition, if the borrowers sell their homes, such borrowers may be unable to repay their loans in full from the sale proceeds. Further, a significant amount of our home equity lines of credit consists of second mortgage loans. For those home equity lines secured by a second mortgage, it is unlikely that we will be successful in recovering all or a portion of our loan proceeds in the event of default unless we are prepared to repay the first mortgage loan, and such repayment and the costs associated with a foreclosure are justified by the value of the property. For these reasons, we may experience higher rates of delinquencies, default and losses on our residential loans.
Our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio.
Lending money is a substantial part of our business, and each loan carries a certain risk that it will not be repaid in accordance with its terms or that any underlying collateral will not be sufficient to assure repayment. This risk is affected by, among other things:
•the cash flow of the borrower and/or the project being financed;
•the changes and uncertainties as to the future value of the collateral, in the case of a collateralized loan;
•the duration of the loan;
•the credit history of a particular borrower; and
•changes in economic and industry conditions.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged against operating income, that we believe is appropriate to provide for probable losses in our loan portfolio. The appropriate
level of the ALL is determined by management through periodic comprehensive reviews and consideration of several factors, including, but not limited to:
•an ongoing review of the quality, size and diversity of the loan portfolio;
•evaluation of non-performing loans;
•historical default and loss experience;
•existing economic conditions and management's expectations of future events;
•risk characteristics of the various classifications of loans;
•the amount and quality of collateral, including guarantees, securing the loans; and
•regulatory requirements and expectations.
The determination of the appropriate level of the ALL inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. If our estimates are incorrect, the ALL may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in the need for increases in the ALL through the provision for losses on loans which is charged against income. In addition, deterioration in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside our control, may also require an increase in the allowance for loan losses.
Management recognizes that significant new growth in loan portfolios, new loan products and the refinancing of existing loans can result in portfolios comprised of unseasoned loans that may not perform in a historical or projected manner and will increase the risk that the ALL may be sufficient to absorb losses. Bank regulatory agencies also periodically review our ALL and may require an increase in the provision for possible loan losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different from those of management. If charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for loan losses, we will need additional provisions to replenish the ALL. Any additional provisions will result in a decrease in net income and possibly capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Finally, beginning on October 1, 2023, the Company adopted the CECL standard to determine estimates of lifetime expected credit losses on loans and recognize the expected credit losses as allowances for credit losses at inception of the loan. The adoption of CECL will change the allowance calculation methodology from a historical incurred loss model to an expected future loss model. The adjustment recorded upon our adoption of the CECL standard was not significant to the overall allowance for credit losses ("ACL") as compared to the ALL at September 30, 2023.
If our non-performing assets increase, our earnings will be adversely affected.
At September 30, 2023, our non-performing assets (which consisted solely of non-accruing loans, non-accrual investment securities, and OREO) were $1.60 million, or 0.09% of total assets. Our non-performing assets adversely affect our net income in various ways:
•We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or non-performing investment securities, except on a cash basis when the collectibility of the principal is not in doubt.
•We must provide for probable loan losses through a current period charge to the provision for loan losses.
•Non-interest expense increases when we must write down the value of OREO properties, if any, to reflect changing market values.
•Non-interest income decreases when we must recognize other-than-temporary impairment on non-performing investment securities.
•There are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets, as well as carrying costs, such as taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs related to OREO.
•The resolution of non-performing assets requires the active involvement of management, which can distract them from more profitable activities.
If additional borrowers become delinquent and we are unable to successfully manage our non-performing assets, our losses and troubled assets could increase significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risk Related to our Business Strategy
We may be adversely affected by risks associated with completed and potential acquisitions.
As part of our general growth strategy, on October 1, 2018, we completed the acquisition of South Sound Bank, a Washington-state chartered bank, headquartered in Olympia, Washington. Although our business strategy emphasizes organic expansion, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, we engage in preliminary discussions with potential acquisition targets. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions or successfully integrate acquired operations into our existing operations or expand into new markets. The consummation of any future acquisitions may dilute shareholder value or may have an adverse effect upon our operating results while the operations of the acquired business are being integrated into our operations. In addition, once integrated, acquired operations may not achieve levels of profitability comparable to those achieved by our existing operations, or otherwise perform as expected. Further, transaction-related expenses may adversely affect our earnings. These adverse effects on our earnings and results of operations may have a negative impact on the value of our common stock. Acquiring banks, bank branches or businesses involves risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including:
•We may be exposed to potential asset quality issues or unknown or contingent liabilities of the banks, businesses, assets, and liabilities we acquire. If these issues or liabilities exceed our estimates, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially negatively affected;
•We could experience higher than expected deposit attrition;
•The acquisition of other entities generally requires integration of systems, procedures and personnel of the acquired entity into our company to make the transaction economically successful. This integration process is complicated and time consuming and can also be disruptive to the customers of the acquired business. If the integration process is not conducted successfully and with minimal adverse effect on the acquired business and its customers, we may not be able to realize the anticipated economic benefits of the acquisition within the expected time frame, and we may lose customers or employees of the acquired business. We may also experience greater than anticipated customer losses even if the integration process is successful;
•To the extent that our costs of an acquisition exceed the fair value of the net assets acquired, the acquisition will generate goodwill. As discussed below, we are required to assess our goodwill for impairment at least annually, and any goodwill impairment charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition; and
•We expect that our net income will increase following an acquisition; however, we also expect our general and administrative expenses to increase, which could result to an increase in our efficiency ratio. Ultimately, we would expect our efficiency ratio to improve; however, if we are not successful in our integration process, this may not occur, and our acquisition or branching activities may not be accretive to earnings in the short or long-term.
Risk Related to Market Interest Rates
Changes in interest rates may reduce our net interest income and may result in higher defaults in a rising rate environment.
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Federal Reserve. Since March 2022, in response to inflation, the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") of the Federal Reserve has increased the target range for the federal funds rate by 525 basis points, including 225 basis points during the 2023 fiscal year, to a range of 5.25% to 5.50% as of September 30, 2023. The FOMC has paused increases to the target federal funds rate but has not ruled out future increases and hinted that rates will remain higher for longer. If the FOMC further increases the targeted federal funds rate, overall interest rates will likely rise, which will negatively impact our net interest income and may negatively impact both the housing market by reducing refinancing activity and new home purchases and the U.S. economy. In addition, inflationary pressures will increase our operational costs and could have a significant negative effect on our borrowers, especially our business borrowers, and the values of collateral securing loans which could negatively affect our financial performance.
We principally manage interest rate risk by managing our volume and mix of our earning assets and funding liabilities. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and investments and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but these changes could also affect: (1) our ability to originate and/or sell loans and obtain deposits; (2) the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, which could negatively impact shareholders’ equity, and our ability to realize gains from the sale of such assets; (3) our ability to obtain and retain deposits in competition with other available investment alternatives; (4) the ability of our borrowers to repay adjustable or variable rate loans; and (5) the average duration of our investment securities portfolio and other interest-earning assets. If the interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest received on loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments decline more rapidly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. In a changing interest rate environment, we may not be able to manage this risk effectively. If we are unable to manage interest rate risk effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected.
Changes in interest rates could also have a negative impact on our results of operations by reducing the ability of borrowers to repay their current loan obligations or by reducing our margins and profitability. Our net interest margin is the difference between the yield we earn on our assets and the interest rate we pay for deposits and our other sources of funding. Changes in interest rates (up or down) could adversely affect our net interest margin and, as a result, our net interest income. Although the yield we earn on our assets and our funding costs tends to move in the same direction in response to changes in interest rates, one can rise or fall faster than the other, causing our net interest margin to expand or contract. Changes in the slope of the "yield curve," or the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates, could also reduce our net interest margin. Normally, the yield curve is upward sloping, meaning short-term rates are lower than long-term rates. Because our liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than our assets, when the yield curve flattens or even inverts, we could experience pressure on our net interest margin as our cost of funds increases relative to the yield we can earn on our assets. Also, interest rate decreases can lead to increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities as borrowers refinance their loans to reduce borrowing costs. Under these circumstances we are subject to reinvestment risk as we may have to redeploy such repayment proceeds into lower yielding investments, which would likely negatively impact our income.
A sustained increase or decrease in market interest rates could adversely affect our earnings. As is the case with many financial institutions, our emphasis on increasing core deposits, those deposits bearing no or a relatively low rate of interest with no stated maturity, has resulted in our having a significant amount of these deposits which have a shorter duration than our assets. At September 30, 2023, we had $251.74 million in certificates of deposit that mature within one year and $1.26 billion in non-interest bearing, NOW checking, savings and money market accounts. We would incur a higher cost of funds to retain these deposits in a rising interest rate environment. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. In addition, a substantial amount of our residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit have adjustable interest rates. As a result, these loans may experience a higher rate of default in a rising interest rate environment.
Changes in interest rates also affect the value of our investment securities available for sale. Generally, the fair value of fixed-rate securities fluctuates inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available for sale are reported as a separate component of equity, net of tax. Decreases in the fair value of investment securities available for sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on stockholders' equity. Stockholders' equity, specifically accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI"), is increased or decreased by the amount of change in the estimated fair value of our securities available for sale, net of deferred income taxes. Increases in interest rates generally decrease the fair value of securities available for sale, which adversely impacts stockholders' equity.
Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Also, our interest rate risk modeling techniques and assumptions likely may not fully predict or capture the impact of actual interest rate changes on our balance sheet or projected operating results. For further discussion of how changes in interest rates could impact us, see "Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" for additional information about our interest rate risk management.
Our securities portfolio may be negatively impacted by fluctuations in market value and interest rates.
Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions in respect of the securities, defaults by, or other adverse events affecting, the issuer or with respect to the underlying securities, and changes in market interest rates and continued instability in the capital markets. Any of these factors, among others, could cause other-than-temporary impairments ("OTTI") and realized and/or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in AOCI. The process for determining whether impairment of a security is other-than-temporary impaired usually requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performance and liquidity of the issuer and any collateral underlying the security to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the security. There can be no assurance that the declines in market value will not result in other-than-temporary impairments of these assets, and lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An increase in interest rates, change in the programs offered by Freddie Mac or our ability to qualify for their programs may reduce our mortgage revenues, which would negatively impact our non-interest income.
The sale of residential mortgage loans to Freddie Mac has historically provided a significant portion of our non-interest income. Future changes in Freddie Mac's program, including our eligibility to participate, the criteria for loans to be accepted or laws that significantly affect the activity of Freddie Mac could materially adversely affect our results of operations if we could not find other purchasers. Mortgage banking is generally considered a volatile source of income because it depends largely on the level of loan volume which, in turn, depends largely on prevailing market interest rates. In a rising or higher interest rate environment, the demand for mortgage loans, particularly refinancing of existing mortgage loans, tends to fall and
our originations of mortgage loans may decrease, resulting in fewer loans that are available to be sold. This would result in a decrease in mortgage revenues and a corresponding decrease in non-interest income. In addition, our results of operations are affected by the amount of non-interest expense associated with our loan sale activities, such as salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment and data processing expense and other operating costs. During periods of reduced loan demand, our results of operations may be adversely affected to the extent that we are unable to reduce expenses commensurate with the decline in loan originations. In addition, although we sell loans to Freddie Mac or into the secondary market without recourse, we are required to give customary representations and warranties about the loans we sell. If we breach those representations and warranties, we may be required to repurchase the loans and we may incur a loss on the repurchase.
Risks Related to Laws and Regulations
We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and regulations that could increase our costs of operations.
The banking industry is extensively regulated. Federal banking regulations are designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance funds and consumers, not to benefit a company's shareholders. These regulations may sometimes impose significant limitations on our operations. Certain significant federal and state banking regulations that affect us are described in this report under the heading "Item 1. Business - How We Are Regulated." These regulations, along with existing tax, accounting, securities, insurance, and monetary laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations control the methods by which financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. These laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Any new regulations or legislation, change in existing regulations or oversight, whether a change in regulatory policy or a change in a regulator's interpretation of a law or regulation, could have a material impact on our operations, increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and adversely affect our profitability. In this regard, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN"), published guidelines in 2014 for financial institutions servicing marijuana businesses that are legal under state law. These guidelines allow us to work with marijuana-related businesses that are operating in accordance with state laws and regulations as long as we comply with required regulatory oversight of their accounts with us. In addition, legislation is currently pending in Congress that would allow banks and financial institutions to serve marijuana businesses in states where it is legal without any risk of federal prosecution. At September 30, 2023, approximately 1.3% of our total deposits and a portion of our service charges from deposits are from legal marijuana-related businesses. Any adverse change in this FinCEN guidance, any new regulations or legislation, any change in existing regulations or oversight, whether a change in regulatory policy or a change in a regulator's interpretation of a law or regulation, could have a negative impact on our non-interest income, as well as the cost of our operations, increasing our cost of regulatory compliance and of doing business and/or otherwise affect us, which may materially affect our profitability.
Non-compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions and limit our ability to get regulatory approval of acquisitions.
The USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions and limit our ability to get regulatory approval of acquisitions. While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance can be given that these policies and procedures will be effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational consequences for us. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may materially affect our business and results of operations.
The effects of climate change continue to create an alarming level of concern for the state of the global environment. As a result, the global business community has increased its political and social awareness surrounding the issue, and the United States has entered into international agreements to reduce global temperatures, such as reentering the Paris Agreement. Further, the U.S. Congress, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies continue to propose numerous initiatives to supplement the global effort to combat climate change. Similar and even more expansive initiatives are expected under the current administration, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks’ risk management practices, accounting for the effects of climate change in stress testing scenarios and systemic risk assessments, revising expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based on climate-related factors and encouraging investment by banks in climate-related initiatives and lending to communities disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. The lack of
empirical data surrounding the credit and other financial risks posed by climate change render it difficult, or even impossible, to predict how specifically climate change may impact our financial condition and results of operations; however, the physical effects of climate change may also directly impact us. Specifically, unpredictable and more frequent weather disasters may adversely impact the real property, and/or the value of the real property, securing the loans in our portfolios. Additionally, if insurance obtained by our borrowers is insufficient to cover any losses sustained to the collateral, or if insurance coverage is otherwise unavailable to our borrowers, the collateral securing our loans may be negatively impacted by climate change, natural disasters and related events, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations. Further, the effects of climate change may negatively impact regional and local economic activity, which could lead to an adverse effect on our customers and impact the communities in which we operate. Overall, climate change, its effects and the resulting, unknown impact could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Third-Parties and Technology
The financial services market is undergoing rapid technological changes and, if we are unable to stay current with those changes, we may not be able to effectively compete.
The financial services market, including banking services, is undergoing rapid changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to keep pace with the technological changes and to use technology to satisfy and grow customer demand for our products and services and to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements and will be able to invest more heavily in developing and adopting new technologies, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. As a result, our ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.
We are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology.
Our security measures may not be sufficient to mitigate the risk of a cyber-attack. Communications and information systems are essential to the conduct of our business, as we use such systems to manage our customer relationships, our general ledger and virtually all other aspects of our business. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, the security of our computer systems, software, and networks may be vulnerable to breaches, fraudulent or unauthorized access, denial or degradation of service attacks, misuse, computer viruses, malware or other malicious code and cyber-attacks that could have a security impact. If one or more of these events occur, this could jeopardize our or our customers' confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our customers or counterparties. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us. We could also suffer significant reputational damage.
Security breaches in our internet banking activities could further expose us to possible liability and damage our reputation. Increases in criminal activity levels and sophistication, advances in computer capabilities, vulnerabilities in third-party technologies (including browsers and operating systems) or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that we use to prevent fraudulent transactions and to protect data about us, our clients and underlying transactions. Any compromise of our security could deter customers from using our internet banking services that involve the transmission of confidential information. Although we have developed and continue to invest in systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyber attacks and periodically test our security, these precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of our security measures, and could result in losses to us or our customers, our loss of business and/or customers, damage to our reputation, the incurrence of additional expenses, disruption to our business, our inability to grow our online services or other businesses, additional regulatory scrutiny or penalties, or our exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
Our security measures may not protect us from system failures or interruptions. While we have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of systems failures and interruptions, there can be no assurance that such events will not occur or that they will be adequately addressed if they do. In addition, we outsource certain aspects of our data processing and other operational functions to certain third-party providers. While the Company selects third-party vendors carefully, it does not control their actions. If our third-party providers encounter difficulties, including those resulting from breakdowns, or other disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or
higher transaction volumes, cyber-attacks and security breaches or if we otherwise have difficulty in communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and our ability to deliver products and services to our customers and otherwise conduct business operations could be adversely impacted. Replacing these third-party vendors could also entail significant delay and expense. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information through various other vendors and their personnel.
We cannot assure that such breaches, failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed by us or the third-parties on which we rely. We may not be insured against all types of losses as a result of third-party failures and insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover all losses, resulting from breaches, systems failures or other disruptions. If any of our third-party service providers experience financial, operational or technological difficulties, or if there is any other disruption in our relationships with them, we may be required to identify alternative sources of such services, and we cannot assure that we could negotiate terms that are as favorable to us or could obtain services with similar functionality as found in our existing systems without the need to expend substantial resources, if at all. Further, the occurrence of any systems failure or interruption could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business, could subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to legal liability. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business financial condition and results of operations.
Our business may be adversely affected by an increasing prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes.
We are susceptible to fraudulent activity that may be committed against us or our customers which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our customers, disclosure or misuse of our information or our customers' information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our customers, litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts. Nationally, reported incidents of fraud and other financial crimes have increased. We have also experienced losses due to apparent fraud and other financial crimes. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent such losses, there can be no assurance that such losses will not occur.
We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business infrastructure.
We rely on numerous external vendors to provide us with products and services necessary to maintain our day-to-day operations. Accordingly, our operations are exposed to risk that these vendors will not perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements. The failure of an external vendor to perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements because of changes in the vendor's organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products and services or strategic focus or for any other reason, could be disruptive to our operations, which in turn could have a material negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations. We also could be adversely affected to the extent that such an agreement is not renewed by a third-party vendor or is renewed on terms less favorable to us. Additionally, the bank regulatory agencies expect financial institutions to be responsible for all aspects of our vendors' performance, including aspects which they delegate to third-parties. Disruptions or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems that support our business and customers, or cyber-attacks or security breaches of the networks, systems or devices that our customers use to access our products and services could result in client attrition, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs, any of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Risks Related to Accounting Matters
We may experience future goodwill impairment, which could reduce our earnings.
We performed our test for goodwill impairment for fiscal year 2023 with the assistance of an independent third-party firm specializing in goodwill impairment valuations for financial institutions. Based on the assessment, the Company determined that it is not "more likely than not" that the Company's fair value is less then it carry amount, and, therefore, goodwill was not impaired. Our test of goodwill for potential impairment is based on a qualitative assessment by management that takes into consideration macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost or margin factors, financial performance and share price. Our evaluation of the fair value of goodwill involves a substantial amount of judgment. If our judgment was incorrect, or if events or circumstances change, and an impairment of goodwill was deemed to exist, we would be required to write down our goodwill resulting in a charge against operations, which would adversely affect our results of operations, perhaps materially; however, it would have no impact on our liquidity, operations or regulatory capital.
We may experience decreases in the fair value of our loan servicing rights, which could reduce our earnings.
Loan servicing rights are capitalized at estimated fair value when acquired through the origination of loans that are subsequently sold with servicing rights retained. At September 30, 2023, our loan servicing rights totaled $2.12 million. Loan servicing rights are amortized to servicing income on loans sold over the period of estimated net servicing income. The estimated fair value of loan servicing rights at the date of the sale of loans is determined based on the discounted present value of expected future cash flows using key assumptions for servicing income and costs and prepayment rates on the underlying loans. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the fair value of loan servicing rights for impairment by comparing actual cash flows and estimated cash flows from the loan servicing assets to those estimated at the time loan servicing assets were originated. Our methodology for estimating the fair value of loan servicing rights is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions, such as prepayment speeds. The effect of changes in market interest rates on estimated rates of loan prepayments represents the predominant risk characteristic underlying the loan servicing rights portfolio. For example, a decrease in interest rates typically increases the prepayment speeds of loan servicing rights and therefore decreases the fair value of the loan servicing rights. Future decreases in interest rates could decrease the fair value of our loan servicing rights below their recorded amount, which would decrease our earnings.
If our investments in real estate are not properly valued or sufficiently reserved to cover actual losses, or if we are required to increase our valuation allowances, our earnings could be reduced.
We obtain updated valuations in the form of appraisals and broker price opinions when a loan has been foreclosed and the property is taken in as OREO, and at certain other times during the asset's holding period. Our net book value (“NBV”) in the loan at the time of foreclosure and thereafter is compared to the updated estimated market value of the foreclosed property less estimated selling costs (fair value). A charge-off is recorded for any excess in the asset’s NBV over its fair value. If our valuation process is incorrect or if the property declines in value after foreclosure, the fair value of our OREO may not be sufficient to recover our NBV in such assets, resulting in the need for a valuation allowance.
In addition, bank regulators periodically review any OREO we may have and may require us to recognize further valuation allowances. Significant charge-offs to our OREO may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Other Risks Related to Our Business
Managing reputational risk is important to attracting and maintaining customers, investors and employees.
Threats to our reputation can come from many sources, including adverse sentiment about financial institutions generally, unethical practices, employee misconduct, failure to deliver minimum standards of service or quality, compliance deficiencies and questionable or fraudulent activities of our customers. We have policies and procedures in place to protect our reputation and promote ethical conduct, but these policies and procedures may not be fully effective. Negative publicity regarding our business, employees, or customers, with or without merit, may result in the loss of customers, investors and employees, costly litigation, a decline in revenues and increased governmental regulation.
Ineffective liquidity management could adversely affect our financial results and condition.
Liquidity is essential to our business. We rely on several sources in order to meet our potential liquidity demands. Our primary sources of liquidity are increases in deposit accounts, cash flows from loan payments and our securities portfolio. Borrowings also provide us with a source of funds to meet liquidity demands. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans or other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and borrowings if desired, we may not be able to replace such funds in the future if, among other things, our financial condition, the financial condition of the FHLB or FRB, or market conditions change. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity due to a downturn in the Washington markets in which our loans and deposits are concentrated, negative operating results, or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry or deterioration in credit markets. Any decline in available funding in amounts adequate to finance our activities or on terms which are acceptable could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet our expenses, or fulfill obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity” of this Form 10-K.
Our growth or future losses may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed or the cost of that capital may be very high.
We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. If we are able to raise capital, it may not be on terms that are acceptable to us. Accordingly, we cannot make assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations could be materially impaired and our financial condition and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, any additional capital we obtain may result in the dilution of the interests of existing holders of our common stock. Further, if we are unable to raise additional capital when required by our bank regulators, we may be subject to adverse regulatory action.
Our framework for managing risks may not be effective in mitigating risk and loss to us.
We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, analyze and control the types of risk to which we are subject. These risks include liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk, and reputational risk, among others. We also maintain a compliance program to identify, measure, assess and report on our adherence to applicable laws, policies and procedures. While we assess and improve these programs on an ongoing basis, there can be no assurance that our risk management or compliance programs, along with other related controls, will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in our business. As with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to our risk management strategies as there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent on key personnel, and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affect our prospects.
Competition for qualified employees and personnel in the banking industry is intense, and there are a limited number of qualified persons with knowledge of, and experience in, the community banking industry where the Bank conducts its business. The process of recruiting personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to carry out our strategies is often lengthy. Our success depends to a significant degree upon our ability to attract and retain qualified management, loan origination, finance, administrative, marketing and technical personnel and upon the continued contributions of our management and personnel. In particular, our success has been and continues to be highly dependent upon the abilities of key executives, including our Chief Executive Officer and certain other employees. In addition, our success has been and continues to be highly dependent upon the services of our directors, and we may not be able to identify and attract suitable candidates to replace such directors.