|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Table of Contents |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Page No. |
||
Part I. |
Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 |
3 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
December 31, 2010 and 2009 and March 31, 2010 |
4 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 |
6 |
|
|
|
||
|
7 22 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
|
|
|
23 29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
Quantit a ti ve an d Q u a li tative D is c losur es a bout Market Risk |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
29 30 |
|
|
|
||
Part II. |
Other Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
30 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Unr egi stere d Sales of Equity Securi ties and U se of Proceeds |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
31 |
|
|
|||
32 |
|||
|
|
||
33 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
- 5 -
- 6 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(in thousands)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
Because of the seasonal nature of the Companys business, the results of operations for any fiscal quarter will not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for other quarters or a full fiscal year. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operation and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented have been included. The unaudited information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.
The Company historically presented the current and noncurrent advances on purchases of tobacco (prepaid inventory) at contractually stated amounts on the face of its balance sheet. The Company changed its presentation of advances on purchases of tobacco as of March 31, 2010 to present the advances at the lower of its cost basis or estimated recoverable amounts instead of its contractually stated or notional amount. The Company believes this change in presentation provides a more transparent view of its application of an inventory model in accounting for its advances on purchases of tobacco. Historically, the Company reported deferred amounts including the mark-up, interest and unrecoverable provisions in inventories. The Company has reclassified these amounts from inventories to current and long term advances to tobacco suppliers. The amount reclassified from inventories to current advances to tobacco suppliers was a reduction of $33,857 and a reduction of $3,908 to long term advances to tobacco suppliers included in other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2009.
Taxes Collected from Customers
Certain subsidiaries are subject to value added taxes on local sales. These amounts have been included in sales and were $6,868 and $6,833 for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $25,538 and $25,124 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Other Deferred Charges
Other deferred charges are primarily deferred financing costs that are amortized over the life of the debt.
Sale of Brazilian Assets
On June 21, 2010, the Companys subsidiary in Brazil announced it had entered into an agreement with Philip Morris Brasil Industria e Comercia Ltda (PMB), an affiliate of Philip Morris International, Inc. (PMI). In connection with the transaction, the Company assigned contracts with approximately 9,000 tobacco suppliers in Southern Brazil representing approximately 20% of current Brazilian volume and sold some of its related assets to PMB at September 30, 2010. The Company recorded a gain of $18,101 on the sale of these assets in Other Income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations at September 30, 2010. The Company sold the remaining related assets to PMB during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 and recorded a gain of $19,424 in Other Income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations at December 31, 2010. The Company expects to continue to supply processed tobacco to PMI and to process tobacco for PMB grown by PMBs contracted suppliers under a long-term processing agreement.
New Accounting Standards
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
On April 1, 2010, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets. The objective of this accounting guidance is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. The Company adopted this new accounting guidance with no material impact to its financial condition and results of operations. See Note 16 Sale of Receivables for further details.
On April 1, 2010, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on accounting for variable interest entities. The objective of this accounting guidance is to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The Company adopted this new accounting guidance with no material impact to its financial condition and results of operations. See Note 6 Variable Interest Entities for further details.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The objective of this accounting guidance is to address the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. This accounting guidance will be effective for the Company on April 1, 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new accounting guidance on its financial condition and results of operations.
- 7 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
New Accounting Standards (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted (Continued)
In January 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures. This guidance requires reporting entities to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. It will also require reporting entities to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in their Level 3 fair value reconciliations. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures (the Level 1 and Level 2 changes) were effective for the Company on January 1, 2010 with no material impact to the Company. The disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for the Company on April 1, 2011. The Company does not expect these new disclosure requirements to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
2. INCOME TAXES
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys unrecognized tax benefits totaled $20,469, all of which would impact the Companys effective tax rate if recognized.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2010, accrued interest and penalties totaled $9,676 and $3,596, respectively.
The Company expects to continue accruing interest expenses related to the unrecognized tax benefits described above. Additionally, the Company may be subject to fluctuations in the unrecognized tax liability due to currency exchange rate movements.
Other than the expiration of an applicable statute of limitations pertaining to international unrecognized tax benefits of $3,778, interest of $7,878, and penalties of $2,157, the Company does not foresee any reasonably possible changes in the unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months but must acknowledge circumstances can change due to unexpected developments in the law. In certain jurisdictions, tax authorities have challenged positions that the Company has taken that resulted in recognizing benefits that are material to its financial statements. The Company believes it is more likely than not that it will prevail in these situations and accordingly have not recorded liabilities for these positions. The Company expects the challenged positions to be settled at a time greater than twelve months from its balance sheet date.
The Company and its subsidiaries file a U.S. federal consolidated income tax return as well as returns in several U.S. states and a number of foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2010, the Companys earliest open tax year for U.S. federal income tax purposes was its fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. Open tax years in state and foreign jurisdictions generally range from three to six years.
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, certain events led to a change in managements judgment related to the recognition of tax benefits for certain U.S. foreign tax credit carryovers. As a result, during the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a $7,000 income tax expense for unrecognized tax benefits and the corresponding reduction of deferred tax asset for foreign tax credit carryovers. During January 2011, the Company and U.S. Internal Revenue Service agreed to a resolution of the examination of its U.S. federal income tax returns for fiscal years March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008, resulting in an adjustment to foreign tax credit carryovers.
Provision for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010
The effective tax rate used for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 was an expense of 30.1% compared to a benefit of 9.5% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The effective tax rates for these periods are based on the current estimate of full year results including the effect of taxes related to specific events which are recorded in the interim period in which they occur. The Company expects the tax rate for the year ended March 31, 2011 to be 25.6% after absorption of discrete items.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a specific event adjustment expense of $4,324, bringing the effective tax rate estimated for the nine months of 19.9% to 30.1%. This specific event adjustment expense relates primarily to additional income tax, interest, and exchange losses related to liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, reductions in foreign tax credit carryforwards and net exchange gains on income tax accounts. For the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a specific event adjustment benefit of $22,089 bringing the effective tax rate estimated for the nine months of 30.8% to 9.5%. This specific event adjustment benefit relates primarily to a reversal of income tax, interest, penalties, and exchange losses related to liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, and to net exchange gains on income tax accounts. The difference in the estimated effective tax rate for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 from the statutory rate is primarily due to foreign income tax rates lower than the U.S. rate, currency exchange and amortization of goodwill partially offset by increases in unrecognized tax benefits.
- 8 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
3. GUARANTEES
The Company and certain of its foreign subsidiaries guarantee bank loans to suppliers to finance their crops. Under longer-term arrangements, the Company may also guarantee financing on suppliers construction of curing barns or other tobacco production assets. The Company also guarantees bank loans to certain tobacco cooperatives to assist with the financing of their suppliers crops. Guaranteed loans are generally repaid concurrent with the delivery of tobacco to the Company. The Company is obligated to repay any guaranteed loan should the supplier or tobacco cooperative default. If default occurs, the Company has recourse against the supplier or cooperative. The following table summarizes amounts guaranteed and the fair value of those guarantees:
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
Amounts guaranteed (not to exceed) |
$ 102,324 |
|
$ 188,701 |
|
$ 184,575 |
Amounts outstanding under guarantee |
100,040 |
|
173,555 |
|
184,382 |
Fair value of guarantees |
4,866 |
|
11,984 |
|
13,478 |
Of the guarantees outstanding at December 31, 2010 approximately 82% expire within one year and the remainder within five years. The fair value of guarantees is recorded in Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and included in crop costs.
In Brazil, some suppliers obtain government subsidized rural credit financing from local banks that is guaranteed by the Company. The Company withholds amounts owed to suppliers related to the rural credit financing of the supplier upon delivery of tobacco to the Company. The Company remits payments to the local banks on behalf of the guaranteed suppliers. Terms of rural credit financing are such that repayment is due to local banks based on contractual due dates. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively, the Company had balances of $301, $1,420 and $55,926 that were due to local banks on behalf of suppliers. These amounts are included in Accounts Payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
4. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In response to shifting supply and demand balances and the changing business models of the Companys customers, the Company began implementing several strategic initiatives. The first was to begin realigning the Companys organization by transitioning the United Kingdom finance and logistics functions to the United States in October 2010 and closing the Netherlands office in November 2010. In December 2010, new leadership was appointed to better position the Company for the future. At December 31, 2010, other global initiatives were underway to increase operational efficiency and effectiveness. The initiatives will continue over the coming quarters as the Company continues to define and execute the necessary changes to support core business functions.
At December 31, 2010, the company has incurred $13,385 in employee separation and other charges, all related to the Other Regions segment, of which $1,838 has been paid. The remaining balance will be paid primarily in the next twelve months and is recorded in Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not subject to systematic amortization, but rather is tested for impairment annually or whenever events and circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. The Company has chosen the first day of the last quarter of its fiscal year as the date to perform its annual goodwill impairment test.
- 9 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES (Continued)
The Company has no intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. It does have other intangible assets which are being amortized. The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys goodwill and other intangibles for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
Amortizable Intangibles |
|
|||||
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Customer
|
|
Production
|
|
Internally
|
|
Total |
|
Weighted average remaining
|
|
- |
|
15 |
|
6 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ 2,794 |
|
$ 33,700 |
|
$ 7,844 |
|
$ 13,776 |
|
$ 58,114 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
- |
|
(6,529) |
|
(270) |
|
(1,438) |
|
(8,237) |
|
Net March 31, 2009 |
|
2,794 |
|
27,171 |
|
7,574 |
|
12,338 |
|
49,877 |
|
Additions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
329 |
|
329 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
- |
|
(422) |
|
(54) |
|
(664) |
|
(1,140) |
|
Net June 30, 2009 |
|
2,794 |
|
26,749 |
|
7,520 |
|
12,003 |
|
49,066 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
- |
|
(421) |
|
(371) |
|
(696) |
|
(1,488) |
|
Net September 30, 2009 |
|
2,794 |
|
26,328 |
|
7,149 |
|
11,307 |
|
47,578 |
|
Additions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
49 |
|
203 |
|
252 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
- |
|
(421) |
|
(276) |
|
(696) |
|
(1,393) |
|
Net December 31, 2009 |
|
2,794 |
|
25,907 |
|
6,922 |
|
10,814 |
|
46,437 |
|
Additions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
151 |
|
151 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
- |
|
(421) |
|
(481) |
|
(695) |
|
(1,597) |
|
Net March 31, 2010 |
|
2,794 |
|
25,486 |
|
6,441 |
|
10,270 |
|
44,991 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
- |
|
(421) |
|
(47) |
|
(696) |
|
(1,164) |
|
Net June 30, 2010 |
|
2,794 |
|
25,065 |
|
6,394 |
|
9,574 |
|
43,827 |
|
Additions |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
251 |
|
251 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
- |
|
(422) |
|
(22) |
|
(740) |
|
(1,184) |
|
Net September 30, 2010 |
|
2,794 |
|
24,643 |
|
6,372 |
|
9,085 |
|
42,894 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
- |
|
(421) |
|
(233) |
|
(730) |
|
(1,384) |
|
Net December 31, 2010 |
|
$ 2,794 |
|
$ 24,222 |
|
$ 6,139 |
|
$ 8,355 |
|
$ 41,510 |
The following table summarizes the estimated intangible asset amortization expense for the next five years and beyond:
|
For Fiscal
|
|
Customer
|
|
Production
|
|
Internally
|
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
$ 1,685 |
|
$ 1,095 |
|
$ 2,904 |
|
$ 5,684 |
|
2012 |
|
1,685 |
|
1,173 |
|
2,942 |
|
5,800 |
|
2013 |
|
1,685 |
|
1,251 |
|
2,942 |
|
5,878 |
|
2014 |
|
1,685 |
|
1,251 |
|
1,504 |
|
4,440 |
|
2015 |
|
1,685 |
|
1,173 |
|
191 |
|
3,049 |
|
Later |
|
17,061 |
|
498 |
|
38 |
|
17,597 |
|
|
|
$ 25,486 |
|
$ 6,441 |
|
$ 10,521 |
|
$ 42,448 |
* Estimated amortization expense for the internally developed software is based on costs accumulated as of December 31, 2010. These estimates will change as new costs are incurred and until the software is placed into service in all locations.
- 10 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
6. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
On April 1, 2010, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on accounting for variable interest entities (VIEs). This accounting guidance amended the consolidation guidance applicable to VIEs and required additional disclosures concerning an enterprises continuing involvement with VIEs.
Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Company holds a variable interest in one joint venture in which the Company is the primary beneficiary because of its power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity. The joint venture is an enterprise that serves as a dedicated inventory supply source in Asia and the Companys variable interest in this joint venture relate to working capital advances and guarantees of the joint ventures borrowings.
As the primary beneficiary of this VIE, the entitys material assets, liabilities and results of operations are included in the Companys consolidated financial statements. The following table summarizes the material carrying amounts of the entitys assets, all of which are restricted, and liabilities included in the Companys consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2010.
Assets of Consolidated VIE |
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
Inventory |
$ 12,069 |
|
$ 14,269 |
Advances to suppliers |
3,746 |
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of Consolidated VIE |
|
|
|
Notes payable to banks |
- |
|
4,764 |
Amounts presented in the table above as restricted assets relating to the consolidated VIE are adjusted for intercompany eliminations.
Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Company holds variable interests in four joint ventures that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. These joint ventures procure inventory on behalf of the Company and the other joint venture partners. The variable interests relate to equity investments and advances made by the Company to the joint ventures. In addition, the Company also guarantees one of its joint ventures borrowings which also represent a variable interest in that joint venture. The Company is not the primary beneficiary, as it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entities as a result of the entities management and board of directors structure. Therefore, these entities are not consolidated. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2010, the Companys investment in these joint ventures was $22,878 and $25,144, respectively and is classified as Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Companys advances to these joint ventures were $8,936 at March, 31, 2010 and December 31, 2010, and are classified as Accounts Receivable, Related Parties in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Companys guarantee to a joint venture was $17,121 and $16,921 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The investments, advances and guarantee in these joint ventures represent the Companys maximum exposure to loss.
7. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company purchases, processes, sells and stores leaf tobacco. Tobacco is purchased in more than 45 countries and shipped to more than 90 countries. The sales, logistics and billing functions of the Company are primarily concentrated in service centers outside of the producing areas to facilitate access to its major customers. Within certain quality and grade constraints, tobacco is fungible and, subject to these constraints, customers may choose to fulfill their needs from any of the areas where the Company purchases tobacco.
Selling, logistics, billing, and administrative overhead, including depreciation, which originates primarily from the Companys corporate and sales offices are allocated to the segments based upon segment operating income. The Company reviews performance data from purchase through sale based on the source of the product and all intercompany transactions are allocated to the region that either purchases or processes the tobacco.
- 11 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
7. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
The following table presents the summary segment information for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Sales and other operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America |
$ 140,491 |
|
$ 176,766 |
|
$ 634,645 |
|
$ 743,374 |
Other regions |
381,653 |
|
481,587 |
|
937,704 |
|
1,000,617 |
Total revenue |
$ 522,144 |
|
$ 658,353 |
|
$ 1,572,349 |
|
$ 1,743,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America |
$ 21,640 |
|
$ 6,930 |
|
$ 71,557 |
|
$ 78,736 |
Other regions |
8,515 |
|
53,213 |
|
48,933 |
|
100,509 |
Total operating income |
30,155 |
|
60,143 |
|
120,490 |
|
179,245 |
Debt retirement expense |
1,141 |
|
62 |
|
4,584 |
|
40,351 |
Interest expense |
25,277 |
|
29,479 |
|
79,102 |
|
87,224 |
Interest income |
1,660 |
|
957 |
|
5,579 |
|
3,062 |
Income before income taxes and other items |
$ 5,397 |
|
$ 31,559 |
|
$ 42,383 |
|
$ 54,732 |
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is reported as the weighted average of the total shares of common stock outstanding net of shares of common stock held by a wholly owned subsidiary. Shares of common stock owned by the subsidiary were 7,853 at December 31, 2010 and 2009. This subsidiary waives its right to receive dividends and it does not have the right to vote.
Certain potentially dilutive options were not included in the computation of earnings per diluted share because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the shares of common stock during the period and their effect would be antidilutive. These shares totaled 1,222 at a weighted average exercise price of $7.02 per share at December 31, 2010 and 1,626 at a weighted average exercise price of $7.02 per share at December 31, 2009.
In connection with the offering of the Companys 5 ½% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, issued on July 2, 2009 (the Convertible Notes), the Company entered into privately negotiated convertible note hedge transactions (the convertible note hedge transactions) equal to the number of shares that underlie the Companys Convertible Notes. These convertible note hedge transactions are expected to reduce the potential dilution of the Companys common stock upon conversion of the Convertible Notes in the event that the value per share of common stock exceeds the initial conversion price of $5.0280 per share. These shares were not included in the computation of earnings per diluted share because their inclusion would be antidilutive.
On July 28, 2010, the Companys board of directors authorized the purchase up to $40,000 of its common stock through June 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has purchased 2,380 shares of its common stock at a weighted average price paid per share of $3.78.
- 12 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued)
The following table summarizes the computation of earnings per share for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
9. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income were as follows:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income (loss) |
$ (2,001) |
|
$ 47,788 |
|
$ 31,893 |
|
$ 61,289 |
Equity currency conversion adjustment |
(45) |
|
(1,264) |
|
777 |
|
2,162 |
Pension adjustment, net of tax |
- |
|
(359) |
|
- |
|
(359) |
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
(2,046) |
|
46,165 |
|
32,670 |
|
63,092 |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(15) |
|
521 |
|
(237) |
|
1,029 |
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company |
$ (2,031) |
|
$ 45,644 |
|
$ 32,907 |
|
$ 62,063 |
- 13 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to stock-based awards granted under its various employee and non-employee stock incentive plans of $644 and $1,823 for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $1,509 and $5,233 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Companys shareholders amended the 2007 Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan) at its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on August 6, 2009. The 2007 Plan is an omnibus plan that provides the flexibility to grant a variety of equity awards including stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock units, performance awards and incentive awards to officers, directors and employees of the Company.
During the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the Company made the following stock-based compensation awards:
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||
(in thousands, except grant date fair value) |
2010 |
2009 |
2010 |
2009 |
Restricted Stock |
|
|
|
|
Number Granted |
- |
- |
143 |
192 |
Grant Date Fair Value |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 3.34 |
$ 4.25 |
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
|
|
Number Granted |
947 |
- |
947 |
106 |
Grant Date Fair Value |
$ 4.59 |
$ - |
$ 4.59 |
$ 4.26 |
Performance Shares |
|
|
|
|
Number Granted |
- |
- |
- |
1,758 |
Grant Date Fair Value |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 4.19 |
Performance Based Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
|
|
Number Granted |
2,048 |
- |
2,048 |
- |
Grant Date Fair Value |
$ 4.59 |
$ - |
$ 4.59 |
$ - |
Under the terms of both the Performance Shares and Performance Based Restricted Stock Units, shares ultimately issued will be contingent upon specified business performance goals. If minimum standards are not attained, compensation paid under these awards will be zero. Alternatively, if the maximum performance levels described by the plan are attained, the awards may be 150% of the stated award.
11. CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER INFORMATION
Non-Income Tax
The government in the Brazilian State of Parana (Parana) issued a tax assessment on October 26, 2007 with respect to local intrastate trade tax credits that result primarily from tobacco transferred between states within Brazil. The assessment for intrastate trade tax credits taken is $7,908 and the total assessment including penalties and interest through December 31, 2010 is $17,275. The Company believes it has properly complied with Brazilian law and will contest any assessment through the judicial process. Should the Company lose in the judicial process, the loss of the intrastate trade tax credits would have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
The assessment of $7,908 represents intrastate trade tax credit amounts which were offset against intrastate trade tax payables as allowed under Brazilian law. At December 31, 2010, the Company also has intrastate trade tax credits from Parana of $14,113. During fiscal 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $7,143. After the assessment, the Company has treated new expenditures for intrastate trade taxes on tobacco acquisition as a cost of inventory procurement.
The Company also has local intrastate trade tax credits in the Brazil State of Rio Grande do Sul (Rio Grande) of $68,952 and $59,077 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Based on managements expectations about future realization, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance on the Rio Grande intrastate trade tax credits of $36,110 and $7,419 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The allowance on the Rio Grande intrastate trade tax credits may be adjusted in future periods based on market conditions and the Companys ability to use the tax credits.
The Companys subsidiary in Brazil has constructed a new tobacco processing facility in the State of Santa Catarina with the annual production capacity of 70 million kilos. The Company will process the 2011 crop in the new facility. As a result of moving production to Santa Catarina, the Company has excess intrastate tax credits. Therefore, the Company reached an agreement with the government of Santa Catarina to allow the Company to sell its excess credits (receivables) to third parties and recorded a valuation allowance of $3,500 in fiscal 2010. The Company has Santa Catarina intrastate tax credits of $27,987 at December 31, 2010. Based on managements expectations about future realization, the Company has recorded a total valuation allowance on the Santa Catarina intrastate trade tax credits of $12,076 at December 31, 2010.
- 14 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
11. CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)
Non-Income Tax (Continued)
As of January 1, 2011, a new government was elected in the State of Santa Catarina and they temporarily suspended the sale of excess intrastate tax credits. The allowance on the Santa Catarina intrastate tax credits may be adjusted in future periods based on market conditions and the Companys ability to use the tax credits.
In 2001, the Companys subsidiary in Brazil won a claim related to certain excise taxes (IPI credit bonus) for the years 1983 through 1990. The Company used this IPI credit bonus to offset federal income and other taxes until January 2005 when it received a Judicial Order to suspend the IPI compensation. In addition, the Company received an assessment in 2006 for federal income taxes that were offset by the IPI credit bonus. The assessment is valued at $29,184 at December 31, 2010. The Company appealed the assessment and believes it has properly utilized the IPI credit bonus. No benefit for the utilization of the IPI credit bonus has been recognized as it has been recorded in Pension, Postretirement and Other Long-Term Liabilities. As a result of various legislative and judicial actions, the Company does not expect a ruling in the near future, which would directly impact the outcome of the Companys appeal of the tax assessment as well as its utilization of its remaining IPI credit bonus. No benefit for any potential future utilization of IPI credit bonus has been recognized.
Other
In October 2001, the Directorate General for Competition (DGCOMP) of the European Commission (EC) began an administrative investigation into certain tobacco buying and selling practices alleged to have occurred within the leaf tobacco industry in some countries within the European Union, including Spain, Italy, Greece and potentially other countries. The Company and its subsidiaries in Spain, Italy and Greece have been subject to these investigations. In respect of the investigation into practices in Spain, in 2004, the EC fined the Company and its Spanish subsidiaries € 4,415 (US$5,641). In respect of the investigation into practices in Italy, in October 2005, the EC announced that the Company and its Italian subsidiaries have been assessed a fine in the aggregate amount of € 24,000 (US$28,800). With respect to both the Spanish and Italian investigations, the fines imposed on the Company and its predecessors and subsidiaries were part of fines assessed on several participants in the applicable industry. With respect to the investigation relating to Greece, the EC informed the Company in March 2005 it had closed its investigation in relation to the Greek leaf tobacco industry buying and selling practices. The Company, along with its applicable subsidiaries, has appealed the decisions of the EC with respect to Spain and Italy to the Court of First Instance of the European Commission for the annulment or modification of the decision, but the outcome of the appeals process as to both timing and results is uncertain. The Company has fully recognized the impact of each of the fines set forth above and has paid all of such fines as part of the appeal process.
The Company had previously disclosed that it had received notice from Mindo, S.r.l., the purchaser in June 2004 of the Companys Italian subsidiary Dimon Italia, S.r.l., of its intent to assert against the Company, or its subsidiaries, a claim arising out of that sale transaction. That claim, which may be followed by additional claims, was filed before the Court of Rome on April 12, 2007. The claim, allegedly arising from a guaranty letter issued by a consolidated subsidiary of the Company in connection with the sale transaction, seeks the recovery of € 7,377 (US$9,776) plus interest and costs. The Company believes the claim to be without merit and is vigorously defending it. No amounts have been reserved with respect to such claim.
On August 6, 2010, the Company entered into settlement agreements with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to resolve those agencies investigations of the Company relating to alleged violations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) which occurred prior to the merger that formed the Company in May, 2005. Pursuant to the settlement negotiated with DOJ, two of the Companys foreign subsidiaries, Alliance One Tobacco Osh, LLC and Alliance One International AG (successors to DIMON International (Kyrgyzstan) and DIMON International AG, respectively), agreed to plead guilty to FCPA violations committed by DIMON International (Kyrgyzstan) and DIMON International AG prior to the merger creating the Company, and to pay fines totaling $9,450. Additionally, the Company entered into a non-prosecution agreement by the terms of which the DOJ will not prosecute the Company if, for a period of three years, the Company meets its obligations as set out in the agreement. On October 21, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia in Danville, Virginia accepted these guilty pleas and entered a judgment consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement. The settlement negotiated with the SEC includes the Companys agreement to disgorge profits in the amount of $10,000 and to abide by an injunction against further FCPA violations. On August 26, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia approved the terms of the settlement with the SEC and entered the injunction contemplated by the settlement agreement. Both settlements require the Company to retain an independent compliance monitor for a term of three years. The Company provided for these losses at March 31, 2010 and $10,000 was paid to the SEC on August 30, 2010 and $9,452 was paid to the U.S. District Court on October 28, 2010.
- 15 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
11. CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)
Other (Continued)
On December 13, 2007, the Public Prosecutors offices in the States of Santa Catarina and Parana filed claims against the Companys Brazilian subsidiary, Alliance One Brazil Exportadora de Tobaccos Ltda. (AOB) and a number of other tobacco processors on behalf of all tobacco suppliers in those states. The lawsuits primarily assert that there exists an employment relationship between tobacco processors and tobacco suppliers. The Company believes these claims to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend them. Ultimate exposure if an unfavorable outcome is received is not determinable.
At the initial hearing in Santa Catarina, on January 29, 2008, the Court granted the Companys motion to have that case removed to the Labor Court in Brasilia. No hearing date has yet been set.
In the state of Parana, the relief sought by the Public Prosecutor was granted by the local Labor Court. The Company appealed that initial ruling and it was overturned in part and affirmed in part. The Company has appealed from that part of the initial ruling which was affirmed and no ruling has yet been rendered on the appeal. The Company has separately asserted, on April 11, 2008, a lack of jurisdiction motion similar to that which it asserted in the case in Santa Catarina which resulted in the transfer of that case to the Labor Court in Brasilia. No hearing date for that motion has been set.
On June 6, 2008, AOB and a number of other tobacco processors were notified of a class action initiated by the ALPAG - Associação Lourenciana de Pequenos Agricultrores ("Association of Small Farmers of São Lourenço). The class actions focus is a review of tobacco supplier contracts and business practices, specifically aiming to prohibit processors from notifying the national credit agency of producers in debt, prohibiting processors from deducting tobacco suppliers debt from payments for tobacco, and seeking the modification of other contractual terms historically used in the purchase of tobacco. The Company presented its defense locally and the case has been transferred to the Federal Court in Brasilia. No hearing date
has been set. The Company believes this claim to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend it. Ultimate exposure if an unfavorable outcome is received is not determinable.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company records all known asset retirement obligations (ARO) for which the liability can be reasonably estimated. Currently, it has identified an ARO associated with one of its facilities that requires it to restore the land to its initial condition upon vacating the facility. The Company has not recognized a liability under generally accepted accounting principles for this ARO because the fair value of restoring the land at this site cannot be reasonably estimated since the settlement date is unknown at this time. The settlement date is unknown because the land restoration is not required until title is returned to the government, and the Company has no current or future plans to return the title. The Company will recognize a liability in the period in which sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate its fair value. The Company has no additional material AROs.
On December 24, 2010, a third-party warehouse in South Africa was destroyed by fire. This warehouse contained approximately $6,072 of the Companys inventory. The Company believes that its loss is fully insured and has recorded a receivable of the amount of loss for the probable recovery.
12. DEBT ARRANGEMENTS
Senior Notes
On March 7, 2007, the Company issued $150,000 of 8 ½% Senior Notes due 2012 at a 0.5% original issue discount to reflect an 8.6% yield to maturity. On July 2, 2009, the Company completed a number of refinancing transactions in which it purchased $120,365 aggregate principal amount of the existing notes pursuant to a cash tender offer. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company purchased $23,635 of the remaining notes on the open market. All purchased securities were canceled leaving $6,000 of the 8 ½% senior notes outstanding at June 30, 2010. Associated cash premiums and other costs paid were $650. Deferred financing costs and amortization of original issue discount of $282 were accelerated.
On July 2, 2009, the Company issued $570,000 of 10% Senior Notes due 2016 at a 4.823% original issue discount to reflect an 11.0% yield to maturity. On August 26, 2009, the Company issued an additional $100,000 tranche of 10% Senior Notes due 2016 at a 2.5% original issue discount to reflect a 10.512% yield to maturity. These additional notes form part of the same series as the Senior Notes issued on July 2, 2009. The aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes was $670,000. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company purchased $25,000 of these notes on the open market. All purchased securities were canceled leaving $645,000 of the 10% senior notes outstanding at September 30, 2010. Associated cash premiums and other costs paid were $1,038. Deferred financing costs and amortization of original issue discount of $1,474 were accelerated. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company purchased $10,000 of these notes on the open market. All purchased securities were canceled leaving $635,000 of the 10% senior notes outstanding at December 31, 2010. Associated cash premiums and other costs paid were $575. Deferred financing costs and amortization of original issue discount of $566 were accelerated.
At December 31, 2010, the Company did not satisfy the fixed charge coverage ratio required under the Senior Notes indenture to permit the Company to access the restricted payments basket for the purchase of common stock and other actions under that basket. The Company from time to time may not satisfy the required ratio.
- 16 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
13. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swap contracts and foreign exchange contracts at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders equity as a component of other comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income along with the portions of the changes in the fair values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in income. During the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no qualified cash flow or fair value hedges. Estimates of fair value were determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The following table summarizes the fair value of the Companys derivatives by type at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and March 31, 2010.
Earnings Effects of Derivatives
Foreign Currency Contracts
The Company periodically enters into forward or option currency contracts to protect against volatility associated with certain non-U.S. dollar denominated forecasted transactions. When these derivatives qualify for hedge accounting treatment, they are accounted for as cash flow hedges and are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes.
The Company has entered into forward currency contracts to hedge cash outflows in foreign currencies around the world for green tobacco purchases and processing costs as well as selling, administrative and general costs as the Company deems necessary. These contracts do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment under generally accepted accounting principles, and as such, all changes in fair value are reported in income.
The following table summarizes the earnings effects of derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income |
||||||
Derivatives Not Designated
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Cost of goods and services sold |
|
$ 15 |
|
$ (2,980) |
|
$ 3,771 |
|
$ 12,889 |
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Selling, administrative and
|
|
10 |
|
200 |
|
100 |
|
3,599 |
Total |
|
|
|
$ 25 |
|
$ (2,780) |
|
$ 3,871 |
|
$ 16,488 |
Credit Risk
Financial instruments, including derivatives, expose the Company to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties. The Company manages its exposure to counterparty credit risk through specific minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties, and procedures to monitor concentrations of credit risk. If a counterparty fails to meet the terms of an arrangement, the Companys exposure is limited to the net amount that would have been received, if any, over the
arrangements remaining life. The Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties and no material loss would be expected from non-performance by any one of such counterparties.
- 17 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
14. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has a defined benefit plan that provides retirement benefits for substantially all U.S. salaried personnel based on years of service rendered, age and compensation. The Company also maintains various other Excess Benefit and Supplemental Plans that provide additional benefits to (1) certain individuals whose compensation and the resulting benefits that would have actually been paid are limited by regulations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and (2) certain individuals in key positions. The Company funds these plans in amounts consistent with the funding requirements of federal law and regulations.
Additional non-U.S. defined benefit plans sponsored by certain subsidiaries cover certain full-time employees located in Germany, Turkey, Malawi and the United Kingdom.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Net periodic pension cost for continuing operations consisted of the following:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
$ 805 |
|
$ 895 |
|
$ 2,417 |
|
$ 2,685 |
|
Interest expense |
2,192 |
|
2,236 |
|
6,577 |
|
6,707 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
(1,428) |
|
(1,114) |
|
(4,284) |
|
(3,340) |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
6 |
|
(44) |
|
17 |
|
(133) |
|
Actuarial (gain) loss |
335 |
|
(2) |
|
1,004 |
|
(6) |
|
Special termination benefits |
204 |
|
- |
|
204 |
|
- |
|
Net periodic pension cost |
$ 2,114 |
|
$ 1,971 |
|
$ 5,935 |
|
$ 5,913 |
Employer Contributions
The Companys investment objectives are to generate consistent total investment return to pay anticipated plan benefits, while minimizing long-term costs. Financial objectives underlying this policy include maintaining plan contributions at a reasonable level relative to benefits provided and assuring that unfunded obligations do not grow to a level to adversely affect the Companys financial health. As of December 31, 2010, contributions of $8,190 were made to pension plans for fiscal 2011. Additional contributions to pension plans of approximately $2,580 are expected during the remainder of fiscal 2011. However, this amount is subject to change, due primarily to potential plan combinations, asset performance significantly above or below the assumed long-term rate of return on pension assets and significant changes in interest rates.
Postretirement Health and Life Insurance Benefits
The Company also provides certain health and life insurance benefits to retired employees, and their eligible dependents, who meet specified age and service requirements. As of December 31, 2010, contributions of $530 were made to the plans for fiscal 2011. Additional contributions of $386 to the plans are expected during the rest of fiscal 2011. The Company retains the right, subject to existing agreements, to modify or eliminate the postretirement medical benefits.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Net periodic benefit cost for postretirement health and life insurance benefit plans consisted of the following:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
$ 20 |
|
$ 16 |
|
$ 60 |
|
$ 48 |
|
Interest expense |
166 |
|
189 |
|
499 |
|
564 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
(410) |
|
(415) |
|
(1,232) |
|
(1,245) |
|
Actuarial loss |
108 |
|
76 |
|
325 |
|
229 |
|
Curtailment gain recognized |
- |
|
(777) |
|
- |
|
(777) |
|
Settlement gain recognized |
- |
|
(290) |
|
- |
|
(290) |
|
Net periodic pension cost (benefit) |
$ (116) |
|
$ (1,201) |
|
$ (348) |
|
$ (1,471) |
- 18 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
15. INVENTORIES
The following table summarizes the Companys costs in inventory:
|
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
March 31, 2010 |
Processed tobacco |
$ 700,144 |
$ 549,926 |
$ 417,996 |
Unprocessed tobacco |
79,765 |
140,198 |
354,155 |
Other |
40,074 |
46,096 |
51,996 |
|
$ 819,983 |
$ 736,220 |
$ 824,147 |
16. SALE OF RECEIVABLES
On April 1, 2010, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on accounting for the transfers of financial assets. This new accounting guidance is intended to improve the information provided in financial statements concerning transfers of financial assets, including the effects of transfers on financial position, financial performance and cash flows, and any continuing involvement of the transferor with the transferred financial assets.
The Company has entered into an accounts receivable securitization program whereby it sells certain of its trade accounts receivable to a third-party bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity (SPE) which, in turn, sells the receivables to a third-party commercial paper conduit. The SPE was formed for the sole purpose of buying and selling receivables generated by the Company.
The sales price consists of 90% of the face value of the receivable, less contractual dilutions which limit the amount that may be outstanding from any one particular customer and insurance reserves that also have the effect of limiting the risk attributable to any one customer. Upon sale, the Company removes the carrying value of the receivable sold and records the fair value of its beneficial interest in the receivable in accounts receivable. The fair value of the beneficial interest is calculated by applying the commercial paper rate and the servicing rate to the balance of the outstanding receivables in the facility. The Company receives a 0.5% per annum servicing fee on receivables sold and outstanding which is recorded as a reduction of selling, administrative and general expenses. This fee is compensatory and no servicing asset or liability has resulted from the sale. The receivables sold are non-interest bearing. This in conjunction with the short life of the receivables sold and outstanding causes the effects of any prepayments on the value of assets recorded to be inconsequential.
Losses on sale of receivables are recorded as a component of Other Income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The following table summarizes the Companys accounts receivable securitization information as of December 31:
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
16. SALE OF RECEIVABLES (Continued)
It is the Companys intention to maximize the receivables sold under the revolving agreement meaning that amounts collected by the pool would be reinvested in the purchase of additional eligible receivables. The table below indicates the utilization of the revolving agreement:
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Twelve Months
|
||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Average outstanding balance |
$ 63,553 |
|
$ 74,835 |
|
$ 76,711 |
Maximum outstanding balance |
99,113 |
|
96,365 |
|
99,712 |
Minimum outstanding balance |
16,738 |
|
47,174 |
|
47,174 |
17. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company follows the current accounting guidance for fair value measurements for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value include derivative instruments, securitized beneficial interests and guarantees. The non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value primarily include assessments of investments in subsidiaries, goodwill and other intangible assets and long-lived assets for potential impairment. The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Companys long term debt are shown in the table below.
|
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
March 31, 2010 |
Long term debt |
|
|
|
Carrying value |
$ 763,052 |
$ 825,573 |
$ 789,337 |
Estimated fair value |
796,213 |
912,291 |
845,642 |
A three-level valuation hierarchy is used to determine fair value as follows:
·
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
·
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
·
Level 3 Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
The following tables present the Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
Derivative
|
Securitized
|
Total
|
|
Derivative
|
Guarantees |
Total
|
Level 1 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
Level 2 |
218 |
- |
218 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Level 3 |
- |
23,350 |
23,350 |
|
- |
4,866 |
4,866 |
Totals for December 31, 2010 |
$ 218 |
$ 23,350 |
$ 23,568 |
|
$ - |
$ 4,866 |
$ 4,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
Level 2 |
1,075 |
- |
1,075 |
|
2,716 |
- |
2,716 |
Level 3 |
- |
8,084 |
8,084 |
|
- |
11,984 |
11,984 |
Totals for December 31, 2009 |
$ 1,075 |
$ 8,084 |
$ 9,159 |
|
$ 2,716 |
$ 11,984 |
$ 14,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
Level 2 |
2,528 |
- |
2,528 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Level 3 |
- |
25,125 |
25,125 |
|
- |
13,478 |
13,478 |
Totals for March 31, 2010 |
$ 2,528 |
$ 25,125 |
$ 27,653 |
|
$ - |
$ 13,478 |
$ 13,478 |
- 20 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
17. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
The following tables present the changes in Level 3 instruments measured on a recurring basis:
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||
|
Beneficial Interest
|
Guarantees |
Beneficial Interest
|
Guarantees |
Beginning Balance |
$ 25,528 |
$ 4,830 |
$ 25,125 |
$ 13,478 |
Total losses (realized / unrealized
|
(715) |
- |
(1,662) |
- |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements, net |
(1,463) |
36 |
(113) |
(8,612) |
Ending Balance |
$ 23,350 |
$ 4,866 |
$ 23,350 |
$ 4,866 |
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||
|
Beneficial Interest
|
Guarantees |
Beneficial Interest
|
Guarantees |
Beginning Balance |
$ 11,893 |
$ 7,019 |
$ 26,833 |
$ 14,584 |
Total losses (realized / unrealized
|
791 |
- |
1,957 |
- |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements, net |
(4,600) |
4,965 |
(20,706) |
(2,600) |
Ending Balance |
$ 8,084 |
$ 11,984 |
$ 8,084 |
$ 11,984 |
The amount of unrealized losses relating to assets still held December 31, 2010 and 2009 and March 31, 2010 was $366, $524 and $826, respectively, all relating to securitized beneficial interests. Gains and losses included in earnings are reported in Other Income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company did not have any non-recurring fair value adjustments during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Valuation methodologies
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is based on third-party market maker valuation models including amounts related to the Companys own credit risk and counterparty credit risk. The fair value of securitized beneficial interests is based upon a valuation model that calculates the present value of future expected cash flows using key assumptions based on the Companys historical experience, market trends and anticipated performance relative to the particular assets securitized. The fair value of guarantees is based upon the premium the Company would require to issue the same guarantee in a stand-alone arms-length transaction with an unrelated party based upon internally developed models. Internally developed models utilize historical loss data for similar guarantees to develop an estimate of future losses under the guarantees outstanding at the measurement date.
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Companys operating subsidiaries engage in transactions with related parties in the normal course of business. The following is a summary of balances and transactions with related parties of the Company:
|
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
March 31, 2010 |
Balances: |
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
$ 71,167 |
$ 33,116 |
$ 30,061 |
Accounts payable |
13,581 |
11,546 |
20,275 |
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||
|
2010 |
2009 |
|
2010 |
2009 |
Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
$ 47,432 |
$ 69,294 |
|
$ 96,197 |
$ 99,003 |
- 21 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
The Companys operating subsidiaries have entered into transactions with affiliates of the Company for the purpose of procuring inventory.
The Companys balances due to and from related parties are primarily with its deconsolidated Zimbabwe subsidiary. The remaining related party balances and transactions relate to the Companys equity basis investments in companies located in Asia which purchase and process tobacco.
- 22 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
The following executive overview is intended to provide significant highlights of the discussion and analysis that follows.
Financial Results
Revenues and gross profits continue to be impacted by Japan Tobacco Inc.s vertical integration initiative. In addition, increasing oversupply in certain markets and changes in customer buying patterns have reduced sales and margins. As a result, lower processing volumes as well as higher local costs negatively impacted our gross profit percentage. In response to the changes in the industry, we began several strategic initiatives this quarter to increase operational efficiency and effectiveness. These initiatives will continue over future quarters as we define and execute necessary changes to support our core business functions. Operating income did benefit this quarter due to the completion of the sale of assets in Brazil to Philip Morris International, Inc. Our effective tax rate for the quarter increased from a benefit of 47.2% to an expense of 156.9% primarily due to the reversal of unrecognized tax benefit liabilities in the prior year compared to a reduction in foreign tax credit carryforwards and the related deferred tax asset this year. The result of all these factors was a decrease in net income for the three months ending December 31, 2010 of $49.2 million compared to the three months ending December 31, 2009.
Liquidity
Liquidity requirements for our business are impacted by crop seasonality, foreign currency and interest rates, green tobacco prices, crop quality and other factors. We continuously monitor and adjust funding sources as required based on business dynamics, utilizing cash from operations, our revolving credit facility, short term credit lines throughout the world, sales of accounts receivable, active working capital management and advances from customers. As of December 31, 2010, we had $789.5 million of cash and available credit comprised of $41.4 million of cash and $748.1 million in available credit inclusive of $262.0 million undrawn on our revolver, $475.8 million of notes payable to banks, and $10.3 million exclusively for letters of credit. We continually modify the makeup of our available liquidity to enhance business flexibility and reduce costs.
Outlook
Oversupply will likely continue to increase this coming crop year. Looking to the crop after that, we believe that lower prices paid for the coming crop, combined with the profitability of competing crops, may cause many suppliers to produce less tobacco and begin reversing the oversupply trend. We are committed to the successful implementation of the required changes to our business model to reposition our business and we will continue to improve our capital structure while monitoring the market for both our debt and equity securities .
- 23 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|||||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||||||
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
||||||
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
Change |
|
||
(in million, except percentages) |
2010 |
$ |
% |
2009 |
|
2010 |
$ |
% |
2009 |
Sales and other operating revenues |
$ 522.1 |
$(136.3) |
(20.7) |
$658.4 |
|
$ 1,572.3 |
$ (171.7) |
(9.8) |
$ 1,744.0 |
Gross profit |
60.6 |
(37.5) |
(38.2) |
98.1 |
|
210.1 |
(82.8) |
(28.3) |
292.9 |
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
37.4 |
(0.7) |
(1.8) |
38.1 |
|
116.2 |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
116.5 |
Other income |
20.3 |
20.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
40.0 |
37.2 |
|
2.8 |
Restructuring charges |
13.4 |
13.4 |
|
- |
|
13.4 |
13.4 |
|
- |
Debt retirement expense |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
- |
|
4.6 |
(35.8) |
|
40.4 |
Interest expense |
25.3 |
(4.2) |
|
29.5 |
|
79.1 |
(8.1) |
|
87.2 |
Interest income |
1.7 |
0.7 |
|
1.0 |
|
5.6 |
2.5 |
|
3.1 |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
8.5 |
23.4 |
|
(14.9) |
|
12.8 |
18.0 |
|
(5.2) |
Equity in net income of investee companies |
1.1 |
(0.2) |
|
1.3 |
|
2.3 |
1.0 |
|
1.3 |
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
- |
(0.5) |
|
0.5 |
|
(0.2) |
(1.2) |
|
1.0 |
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
$ (2.0) |
$ (49.3) |
|
$ 47.3 |
|
$ 32.1 |
$ (28.2)* |
|
$ 60.3* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Amounts do not equal column totals due to rounding. |
Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
Summary. Sales and other operating revenues decreased 20.7% from $658.4 million in 2009 to $522.1 million in 2010 and gross profit decreased 38.2% from $98.1 million in 2009 to $60.6 million in 2010. Sales decreases are the result of a 13.7% or 17.2 million kilo decrease in quantities sold, an 8.1% or $0.40 per kilo decrease in average sales prices and a 19.4% decrease in processing and other revenues. Gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased from 14.9% in 2009 to 11.6% in 2010 primarily due to less processing volumes resulting from reduced customer requirements and the impact of JTIs vertical integration, higher local costs and product mix. This is the primary reason for our operating income decreasing $30.0 million compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting the impact of decreased gross profits on our operating income are increased gains on the sale of assets of $20.2 million primarily related to the sale of the remaining assets per our agreement with Philip Morris International, Inc. in Brazil and a slight decrease in selling, administrative and general expenses. Another factor contributing to the decrease in our operating income compared to the prior year is $13.4 million in restructuring charges incurred this quarter.
In response to shifting supply and demand balances and the changing business models of our customers, we began implementing several strategic initiatives this quarter including the transition of our United Kingdom finance and logistics functions to the United States and the closing of our Netherlands office. New leadership was also appointed to better position us for the future. Other global initiatives are underway to increase operational efficiency and effectiveness. These initiatives will continue over the coming quarters as we continue to define and execute the necessary changes to support core business functions. There will likely be additional charges related to further restructuring activities in subsequent periods.
- 24 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 (Continued)
Summary (Continued)
This quarter, we purchased $10.0 million of our 10% senior notes as we continue to focus on reducing leverage. Our interest costs decreased $4.2 million primarily as a result of lower interest rates on our seasonal financing compared to the prior year. While decreased interest costs and increased gains on sale of assets were positive impacts on pretax income compared to the prior year, the decreases in revenues and gross margins resulted in our pretax income decreasing from $31.6 million in 2009 to $5.4 million in 2010. Our effective tax rate increased from a benefit of 47.2% in 2009 to an expense of 156.9% in 2010. The significant variance in the effective tax rate between 2010 and 2009 is primarily related to reductions in foreign tax credit carryforwards, foreign currency translation adjustments related to income taxes and the reversal of unrecognized tax benefit liabilities in 2009.
South America Region. Tobacco revenues decreased $36.4 million or 20.6% primarily due to a decrease of 11.3 million kilos in quantities sold partially offset by an increase of $0.70 per kilo in average sales prices. The decrease in volume is mainly attributable to the timing of shipments that were delayed until the third quarter in the prior year and the delay of shipments to future quarters in the current year. The increase in average sales price is primarily due to improved customer pricing to offset higher costs in local currency and exchange rate appreciation.
Gross profit decreased $2.2 million compared to the prior year. The increased average sales prices were not sufficient to offset the impact of decreased volumes due to the timing of shipments.
Other Regions. Tobacco revenues decreased $92.4 million or 20.9% primarily as a result of a decrease of $0.76 per kilo in average sales prices and a decrease of 5.9 million kilos in quantities sold. Processing and other revenues decreased 19.4% or $7.5 million primarily due to reduced customer requirements in North America. Gross profits decreased $35.3 million in 2010 compared to 2009.
Revenues and gross profits were negatively impacted by the impact of JTIs vertical integration initiative. The timing of shipments between quarters this year compared to the prior year, less opportunistic sales in the current year and product mix negatively impacted revenues and margins as well.
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
Summary. Sales and other operating revenues decreased 9.8% from $1,744.0 million in 2009 to $1,572.3 million in 2010 and gross profit decreased 28.3% from $292.9 million in 2009 to $210.1 million in 2010. Sales decreases are the result of a 10.2% or 38.5 million kilo decrease in quantities sold and an $11.8 million decrease in processing and other revenues partially offset by a slight increase of $0.04 per kilo in average sales prices. Gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased from 16.8% in 2009 to 13.4% in 2010 primarily due to less processing volumes from the impact of JTIs vertical integration and opportunistic sales in the prior year, higher local costs and product mix. This is the primary reason for our operating income decreasing $58.8 million compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting the impact of decreased gross profits on our operating income are increased gains on the sale of assets of $37.2 million primarily related to our sale of contracts with tobacco suppliers and other assets in Brazil to Philip Morris International, Inc. and a slight decrease in selling, administrative and general expenses. Another factor contributing to the decrease in our operating income compared to the prior year is $13.4 million in restructuring charges incurred this year.
We began implementing several strategic initiatives this year including the transition of overseas finance and logistics functions to the United States, the closing of our Netherlands office and changes in leadership. Other global initiatives are underway in response to shifting supply and demand balances and the changing business models of our customers. These initiatives will continue over the coming quarters as we continue to define and execute the necessary changes to support core business functions.
This year, we purchased $23.6 million of our 8.5% senior notes and $35.0 million of our 10% senior notes as we focus on reducing leverage. Associated cash premiums and other costs, and the related accelerated amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount, resulted in our recording $4.6 million of debt retirement expense this year. In the prior year, we completed a number of refinancing transactions which resulted in recognition of $40.4 million in significant one-time costs to retire our existing debt and accelerated recognition of the related deferred financing costs and original issue discounts. Our interest costs decreased $8.1 million primarily as a result of lower interest rates on our seasonal financing compared to the prior year. While the increased gain on sale of assets this year and the non-recurrence of the significant debt retirement costs in the prior year positively impacted our pretax income, the decreases in revenues and gross margins resulted in our pretax income decreasing from $54.7 million in 2009 to $42.4 million in 2010. Our effective tax rate increased from a benefit of 9.5% in 2009 to an expense of 30.1% in 2010. The significant variance in the effective tax rate between 2010 and 2009 is primarily related to reductions in foreign tax credit carryforwards, foreign currency translation adjustments related to income taxes and the reversal of unrecognized tax benefit liabilities in 2009.
- 25 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009 (Continued)
South America Region. Tobacco revenues decreased $108.8 million or 14.7% primarily due to a decrease of 44.4 million kilos in quantities sold partially offset by an increase of $0.82 per kilo in average sales prices. The decrease in volume is mainly attributable to the impact of JTIs vertical integration initiative in Brazil in the prior fiscal year. The increase in average sales price is primarily due to product mix and improved customer pricing to offset higher costs in local currency and exchange rate appreciation.
Gross profit decreased $50.9 million due to the impact of JTIs initiative, increased prices of tobacco paid to suppliers and the exchange rate impact on purchase and processing costs which are denominated in local currency.
Other Regions. Tobacco revenues decreased $51.1 million or 5.4% primarily as a result of a $0.34 per kilo decrease in average sales prices partially offset by an increase of 6.0 million kilos in quantities sold. Processing and other revenues decreased 22.8% or $11.8 million primarily as a result of decreased processing volumes in Asia and North America. Gross profits decreased $31.9 million in 2010 compared to 2009.
Volume increases were primarily in Asia partially offset by the negative impact of JTIs vertical integration initiative and shipping delays, including congestion at the port of Beira arising from inadequate dredging. Decreased average sales prices were primarily due to product mix and the increased sales of lower priced byproducts. Gross margin decreases were primarily the result of JTIs vertical integration initiative, product mix and shipping delays.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:
Overview
Our business is seasonal, and purchasing, processing and selling activities have several associated peaks where cash on hand and outstanding indebtedness may be significantly greater or less than at fiscal year-end. We utilize capital in excess of cash flow from operations to finance accounts receivable, inventory and advances to tobacco suppliers in foreign countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Guatemala, Malawi, Tanzania, Turkey and Zambia. In addition, from time to time, we may elect to purchase, redeem, repay, retire or cancel indebtedness prior to stated maturity under our various foreign credit lines, senior secured credit agreement or indentures, as permitted therein. On July 28, 2010, our board of directors authorized the purchase up to $40.0 million of our common stock over the next two years and we purchased 2.4 million shares of our common stock at a weighted average price paid per share of $3.78 through December 31, 2010. Effective December 31, 2010, we did not satisfy the fixed charge coverage ratio required under the Senior Notes indenture to permit us to access the restricted payments basket for the purchase of common stock and other actions under that basket. From time to time we may not satisfy the required ratio.
As of December 31, 2010, we are in the process of repaying our South American related crop lines as we continue to ship inventory and collect receivables. In Africa, we continue to ship product which should continue into the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 as well as the purchase of the new crop which should begin mid-March. In Asia, the Indian Mysore and Indonesian crops are approaching the end of the processing and shipping is in full force. Europe continues shipping of the current crop and is preparing to purchase the new crop during the fourth fiscal quarter. North America has completed flue cured processing with shipping winding down and has commenced the purchasing, processing and shipping of the burley crop which should continue into the fourth fiscal quarter, seasonally elevating its working capital requirements. Depreciation of the U.S. dollar versus many of the currencies in which we have costs may continue to have an impact on our working capital requirements, as such, we will monitor and hedge foreign currency costs prudently, and as needed on a currency by currency basis. Looking forward, we may purchase, redeem, repay, retire or cancel indebtedness prior to stated maturity under our various foreign credit lines, senior secured credit agreement or indentures as permitted.
Working Capital
Our working capital decreased from $795.2 million at March 31, 2010 to $782.4 million at December 31, 2010. Our current ratio was 2.5 to 1 at December 31, 2010 compared to 2.4 to 1 at March 31, 2010. The decrease in working capital is primarily related to increased notes payable to banks partially offset by increased inventories and advances to tobacco suppliers. These changes are attributable to the impact of a global oversupply of tobacco and the related financing, the purchasing and processing of tobacco in the United States and Malawi as well as the financing of crops in South America and in Europe.
The following table is a summary of items from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
- 26 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (Continued)
Working Capital (Continued)
|
As of |
||||
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
||
(in millions, except for current ratio) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 41.4 |
|
$ 109.5 |
|
$ 129.7 |
Net trade receivables |
185.0 |
|
256.3 |
|
207.4 |
Inventories and advances to tobacco suppliers |
923.7 |
|
841.8 |
|
894.9 |
Total current assets |
1,312.1 |
|
1,350.7 |
|
1,382.9 |
Notes payable to banks |
239.8 |
|
286.4 |
|
189.0 |
Accounts payable |
70.0 |
|
50.8 |
|
146.4 |
Advances from customers |
92.5 |
|
61.8 |
|
102.3 |
Total current liabilities |
529.7 |
|
559.6 |
|
587.7 |
Current ratio |
2.5 to 1 |
|
2.4 to 1 |
|
2.4 to 1 |
Working capital |
782.4 |
|
791.1 |
|
795.2 |
Total long term debt |
762.6 |
|
806.2 |
|
788.9 |
Stockholders equity attributable to Alliance One International, Inc. |
415.3 |
|
384.9 |
|
390.4 |
Net cash provided (used) by: |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
(96.0) |
|
(32.2) |
|
|
Investing activities |
(2.6) |
|
(12.9) |
|
|
Financing activities |
10.1 |
|
66.8 |
|
|
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash used by operating activities increased $63.8 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The increase in cash used was primarily due to a $94.6 million decrease in operating cash flows from net income partially offset by a $30.8 million positive change in income taxes. The decrease in cash used for receivables was offset by the increase in cash used for payables. In addition, the increase in cash provided by inventories and advances to suppliers was offset by the decrease in cash provided by customer advances.
Investing Cash Flows
Net cash used by investing activities decreased $10.3 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease in cash used is primarily attributable to the non-recurrence of investments in notes receivables in the prior year. Proceeds from the sale of assets to PMI in Brazil are offset by increased purchases of property, plant and equipment due to the construction of our new facility in Brazil.
Financing Cash Flows
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $56.7 million in 2010 compared to 2009. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease of $103.8 million in net long-term debt proceeds primarily from our debt refinancing in the prior year, $58.1 million primarily related to purchase of our 8.5% senior notes and 10% senior notes in the current year as well as $9.0 million expended to purchase 2.4 million shares of our common stock this year. Partially offsetting this decrease is a $37.6 million increase in the net change in short-term borrowings and a $76.2 million decrease in debt issuance, debt retirement and other debt related costs primarily associated with our refinancing transactions in the prior year. We continuously monitor and adjust our funding sources based on business dynamics in order to enhance business flexibility and reduce costs.
Debt Financing
We continue to finance our business with a combination of short-term seasonal credit lines, our revolving credit facility, long-term debt securities, customer advances and cash from operations. At December 31, 2010 we had cash of $41.4 million and total debt outstanding of $1,002.8 million comprised of $239.8 million of notes payable to banks, $28.0 million of revolver borrowings, $3.1 million of other long-term debt, $610.9 million of 10% senior notes, $6.0 million of 8.5% senior notes and $115.0 million of 5 ½% convertible senior subordinated notes. The $50.8 million seasonal increase in notes payable to banks from March 31, 2010 to December 31, 2010 results from anticipated seasonal fluctuation to account for the current purchase and processing of African and Brazilian tobaccos. Available credit as of December 31, 2010 was $748.1 million comprised of $262.0 million under our revolver, $475.8 million of notes payable to banks and $10.3 million of availability exclusively for letters of credit. We expect to incur $75.0 million of capital expenditures during fiscal year 2011 including our continuing SAP software implementation and new Brazilian factory. Maintenance expenditures are anticipated to be between $20.0 million and $25.0 million. We may also decide to deploy additional discretionary amounts to enhance future business prospects, but only if stringent management return thresholds are likely to be achieved. No cash dividends were paid to stockholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2010. We believe that these sources of liquidity versus our requirements will be sufficient to fund our anticipated needs for the remainder of fiscal year 2011.
- 27 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (Continued)
Debt Financing (Continued)
The following table summarizes our debt financing as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
||||
|
Outstanding |
Lines and |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
December 31, |
Letters |
|
Interest |
|
|
2010 |
2010 |
Available |
|
Rate |
|
Senior secured credit facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolver |
$ - |
$ 28.0 |
$ 262.0 |
(1) |
4.75% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% senior notes due 2016 |
642.2 |
610.9 |
- |
|
10.0% |
|
8 ½% senior notes due 2012 |
29.6 |
6.0 |
- |
|
8.5% |
|
|
671.8 |
616.9 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 ½% convertible senior subordinated
|
115.0 |
115.0 |
- |
|
5.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt |
2.5 |
3.1 |
1.5 |
|
7.8% |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to banks (3) |
189.0 |
239.8 |
474.3 |
|
3.5% |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
$ 978.3 |
$ 1,002.8 |
737.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term |
$ 189.0 |
$ 239.8 |
|
|
|
|
Long term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt current |
$ 0.4 |
$ 0.4 |
|
|
|
|
Long term debt |
788.9 |
762.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 789.3 |
$ 763.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
$ 5.3 |
$ 3.7 |
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit available |
|
|
$ 748.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) As of December 31, 2010, pursuant to Section 2.1 (A) (iv) of the Credit Agreement, the full Revolving Committed Amount was available based on the calculation of the lesser of the Revolving Committed Amount and the Working Capital Amount. |
||||||
|
||||||
(2) Weighted average rate for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 |
||||||
|
||||||
(3) Primarily foreign seasonal lines of credit |
Foreign Seasonal Lines of Credit
We have typically financed our non-U.S. operations with uncommitted unsecured short-term seasonal lines of credit at the local level. These operating lines are seasonal in nature, normally extending for a term of 180 to 270 days corresponding to the tobacco crop cycle in that location. These facilities are typically uncommitted in that the lenders have the right to cease making loans and demand repayment of loans at any time. These loans are typically renewed at the outset of each tobacco season. As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $239.8 million drawn and outstanding on foreign seasonal lines with maximum capacity totaling $728.1 million subject to limitations as provided for in the Credit Agreement. Additionally against these lines there was $10.3 million available in unused letter of credit capacity with $3.7 million issued but unfunded.
- 28 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED:
In October 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The objective of this accounting guidance is to address the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2011. We are evaluating the impact of this new accounting guidance on our financial condition and results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures. This guidance requires reporting entities to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. It will also require reporting entities to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in their Level 3 fair value reconciliations. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures (the Level 1 and Level 2 changes) were effective for us on January 1, 2010. The disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for us on April 1, 2011. We do not expect these new disclosure requirements to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS:
Readers are cautioned that the statements contained herein regarding expectations for our performance are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from our expectations and projections. Risks and uncertainties include changes in the timing of anticipated shipments, changes in anticipated geographic product sourcing, political instability in sourcing locations, currency and interest rate fluctuations, shifts in the global supply and demand position for our tobacco products, and the impact of regulation and litigation on our customers. A further list and description of these risks, uncertainties and other factors can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. At December 31, 2010, we have $22.5 million of Egyptian-based receivables. The current turmoil has not impacted our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, but we continue to assess the potential impact of the current crisis. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments, except as required by law.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There have been no significant changes to our market risk since March 31, 2010. For a discussion on our exposure to market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that, because of inherent limitations, our disclosure controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2010. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) were effective to provide reasonable assurance as of December 31, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the Companys internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
- 29 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Continued)
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Continued)
The Company is currently implementing an ERP system using SAP applications. The implementation is part of a multi-year plan to install SAP at certain operations throughout the world to improve the Companys business processes and deliver enhanced operational and financial performance. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, further developments to the financial reporting process were implemented for operations that have previously implemented SAP and the Company substantially completed the process of implementing SAP in its Argentina and Netherlands operations. This phase of the project has involved changes to certain internal controls over financial reporting, which the Company believes were material.
Other than the financial reporting developments for the Companys operations that have previously implemented SAP and implementation of SAP in its Argentina and Netherlands operations discussed above there were no changes that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
In October 2001, the Directorate General for Competition (DGCOMP) of the European Commission (EC) began an administrative investigation into certain tobacco buying and selling practices alleged to have occurred within the leaf tobacco industry in some countries within the European Union, including Spain, Italy, Greece and potentially other countries. The Company and its subsidiaries in Spain, Italy and Greece have been subject to these investigations. In respect of the investigation into practices in Spain, in 2004, the EC fined the Company and its Spanish subsidiaries € 4.4 million (US$5.6 million). In respect of the investigation into practices in Italy, in October 2005, the EC announced that the Company and its Italian subsidiaries have been assessed a fine in the aggregate amount of € 24.0 million (US$28.8 million). With respect to both the Spanish and Italian investigations, the fines imposed on the Company and its predecessors and subsidiaries were part of fines assessed on several participants in the applicable industry. With respect to the investigation relating to Greece, the EC informed the Company in March 2005 it had closed its investigation in relation to the Greek leaf tobacco industry buying and selling practices. The Company, along with its applicable subsidiaries, has appealed the decisions of the EC with respect to Spain and Italy to the Court of First Instance of the European Commission for the annulment or modification of the decision, but the outcome of the appeals process as to both timing and results is uncertain. The Company has fully recognized the impact of each of the fines set forth above and has paid all of such fines as part of the appeal process.
On August 6, 2010, the Company entered into settlement agreements with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to resolve those agencies investigations of the Company relating to alleged violations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) which occurred prior to the merger that formed the Company in May, 2005. Pursuant to the settlement negotiated with DOJ, two of the Companys foreign subsidiaries, Alliance One Tobacco Osh, LLC and Alliance One International AG (successors to DIMON International (Kyrgyzstan) and DIMON International AG, respectively), agreed to plead guilty to FCPA violations committed by DIMON International (Kyrgyzstan) and DIMON International AG prior to the merger creating the Company, and to pay fines totaling $9.45 million. Additionally, the Company entered into a non-prosecution agreement by the terms of which the DOJ will not prosecute the Company if, for a period of three years, the Company meets its obligations as set out in the agreement. On October 21, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia in Danville, Virginia accepted these guilty pleas and entered a judgment consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement. The settlement negotiated with the SEC includes the Companys agreement to disgorge profits in the amount of $10.0 million and to abide by an injunction against further FCPA violations. On August 26, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia approved the terms of the settlement with the SEC and entered the injunction contemplated by the settlement agreement. Both settlements require the Company to retain an independent compliance monitor for a term of three years. The Company provided for these losses at March 31, 2010 and $10.0 million was paid to the SEC on August 30, 2010 and $9.452 million was paid to the U.S. District Court on October 28, 2010.
The Company had previously disclosed that it had received notice from Mindo, S.r.l., the purchaser in June 2004 of the Companys Italian subsidiary Dimon Italia, S.r.l., of its intent to assert against the Company, or its subsidiaries, a claim arising out of that sale transaction. That claim, which may be followed by additional claims, was filed before the Court of Rome on April 12, 2007. The claim, allegedly arising from a guaranty letter issued by a consolidated subsidiary of the Company in connection with the sale transaction, seeks the recovery of € 7.4 million (US$9.8 million) plus interest and costs.
On December 13, 2007, the Public Prosecutors ’ offices in the States of Santa Catarina and Parana filed claims against the Company ’ s Brazilian subsidiary, Alliance One Brazil Exportadora de Tobaccos Ltda. (AOB) and a number of other tobacco processors, on behalf of all tobacco suppliers in those states. The lawsuits primarily assert that there exists an employment relationship between tobacco processors and tobacco suppliers.
- 30 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 1. Legal Proceedings (Continued)
At the initial hearing in Santa Catarina, on January 29, 2008, the Court granted the Companys motion to have that case moved to the Labor Court in Brasilia. No hearing date has yet been set.
In the state of Parana, the relief sought by the Public Prosecutor was granted by the local Labor Court. The Company appealed that initial ruling and it was overturned in part and affirmed in part. The Company has appealed from that part of the initial ruling which was affirmed and no ruling has yet been rendered on the appeal. The Company has separately asserted, on April 11, 2008, a lack of jurisdiction motion similar to that which it asserted in the case in Santa Catarina which resulted in the transfer of that case to the Labor Court in Brasilia. No hearing date for that motion has been set.
On June 6, 2008, AOB and a number of other tobacco processors were notified of a class action initiated by the ALPAG - Associação Lourenciana de Pequenos Agricultrores ("Association of Small Farmers of São Lourenço). The class
actions focus is a review of tobacco supplier contracts and business practices, specifically aiming to prohibit processors from notifying the national credit agency of producers in debt, prohibiting processors from deducting tobacco suppliers debt from payments for tobacco, and seeking the modification of other contractual terms historically used in the purchase of tobacco. The Company presented its defense locally and the case has been transferred to the Federal Court in Brasilia. No hearing date has been set. The Company believes this claim to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend it. Ultimate exposure if an unfavorable outcome is received is not determinable.
None.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
None.
- 31 -
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
- 33 -
Exhibit 10.3
This document constitutes part of a prospectus covering securities that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Amended and Restated
Alliance One International, Inc.
2007 Incentive Plan
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT, dated the ________ day of ___________, 20__, between Alliance One International, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the Company), and ______________ (Participant), is made pursuant and subject to the provisions of the Amended and Restated Alliance One International, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (the Plan), a copy of which has been made available to the Participant. All terms used herein that are defined in the Plan have the same meaning given them in the Plan.
1.
Award of Stock Units . Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Company, on _______ __, 20__ (the Date of Award), awarded the Participant, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and subject further to the terms and conditions set forth herein, a Stock Unit Award covering ________ shares of Common Stock of the Company (the Restricted Stock Units).
2.
Terms and Conditions .
a.
Vesting . Except as provided in paragraph 2(c), the Participants interest in the Restricted Stock Units shall vest and become non-forfeitable with respect to 50% of the Restricted Stock Units covered by this Agreement on the first anniversary of the Date of the Award and with respect to 25% of the Restricted Stock Units covered by this Agreement on each of the second and third anniversaries of the Date of the Award. Any fraction of a Restricted Stock Unit that becomes vests on any date will be rounded down to the next lowest whole number, with any such fraction added to the portion of the Restricted Stock Unit that vests and becomes free of restrictions on the next vesting date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any unvested Restricted Stock Units covered by this Agreement, shall vest upon the date of the earliest of the following events (i) the Participants death, (ii) the termination of the Participants employment on account of Disability or (iii) a Change in Control; provided that the Participant remains in the continuous employ of the Company or an Affiliate from the Date of the Award until the occurrence of such earliest event. In addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, except as provided in paragraph 2(c), a portion of the Participants interest in any unvested Restricted Stock Units shall vest and become non-forfeitable on the date of termination of the Participants employment by the Company without Cause (Involuntary Termination), if the date of Involuntary Termination precedes the occurrence of any of the events specified in clauses (i) through (iii) of the preceding sentence. In such event, the number of unvested Restricted Stock Units that shall vest upon an Involuntary Termination shall be prorated (rounded up to the nearest whole unit) based on the ratio of the number of calendar months (rounded up to the nearest whole month) that the Participant has remained in the continuous employ of the Company or an Affiliate from the Date of Award through the date of the Involuntary Termination to a 36-month vesting period. Restricted Stock Units that have not vested in accordance with this paragraph 2(a) shall be forfeited, and the Participant shall have no further rights with respect to the unvested Restricted Stock Units, upon the termination of the Participants employment with the Company and its Affiliates other than with respect to Restricted Stock Units that become vested as a result of the Participants death or Involuntary Termination or on account of Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, the Participants termination of employment by the Company will be deemed to be an involuntary termination without Cause unless prior to such termination of employment the Committee determines that the Participant engaged in a Prohibited Activity (as defined in paragraph 2(c).
b.
Settlement . If the Participant vests in some or all of the Restricted Stock Units pursuant to paragraph 2(a), the vested Restricted Stock Units shall be settled by the Company in shares of Common Stock, cash or a combination thereof, in accordance with this paragraph. As soon as practicable after any Restricted Stock Unit vests, but in any event no later than December 31 in the calendar year in which the Restricted Stock Units vest, the Company will at its option with respect to any such Restricted Stock Unit so vested:
i.
issue to the Participant (or his or her estate, if the Participant is deceased) one whole share of Common Stock for such vested Restricted Stock Unit; or
ii
pay to the Participant (or his or her estate, if the Participant is deceased) an amount of cash equal, for such vested Performance-based Stock Unit, to the closing price for a share of Common Stock, as reported on the primary securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, on the date the Committee certified the vesting of such Performance-based Stock Unit pursuant to Section 3(b) hereof, and if such date is not a day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock, then on the next succeeding day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Restricted Stock Units become vested pursuant to paragraph 2(a) as a result of any of the Participants death, the termination of the Participants employment on account of Disability, a Change in Control or an Involuntary Termination at any time in October, November or December, the deadline for settling such vested Restricted Stock Units shall be March 15 in the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which such Restricted Stock Units vest.
c.
Misconduct . The Committee shall have the authority to cancel, rescind, cause the forfeiture of or otherwise limit or restrict any non-vested Restricted Stock Units awarded under this Agreement if the Committee determines that the Participant has (i) violated the Companys Code of Conduct (as in effect from time to time); (ii) violated any law (other than misdemeanor traffic violations) and thereby injured or damaged the business reputation or prospects of the Company or an Affiliate; or (iii) engaged in intentional misconduct that caused, or materially contributed to, the need for a substantial restatement (voluntary or required) of the Companys financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the foregoing enumerated items being hereinafter referred to, individually or collectively, as a Prohibited Activity).
Furthermore, in the event the Committee in its discretion determines that the Participant has engaged in a Prohibited Activity at any time prior to the later of six months after the settlement of any vested Restricted Stock Units pursuant to paragraph 2(b), the Committee may rescind the settlement of any Restricted Stock Units hereunder, provided the Committee takes such action within two years after the occurrence of the Prohibited Activity. Upon such rescission, the Company at its sole option, may require the Participant to (a) deliver and convey to the Company the shares of Common Stock issued in settlement of the Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder; (b) in the case any such shares of Common Stock have been sold in a market transaction to an unrelated party by the Participant, pay to the Company an amount equal to the proceeds from the sale of such shares; (c) in the case any such shares of Common Stock have otherwise been disposed of by the Participant, pay to the Company an amount in cash equal to the product of the number of such shares multiplied by the closing price for a share of Common Stock, as reported on the primary securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, on the date the Committee determined that the Participant has engaged in the Prohibited Activity pursuant to paragraph 2(c) hereof, and if such date is not a day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock, then on the next succeeding day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock; (d) pay to the Company an amount of cash equal to the amount of cash paid by the Company in settlement of any Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder. The Company shall be entitled to set-off any such amount owed to the Company against any amount or benefit owed to the Participant by the Company, and the Participant shall forfeit the amount or benefit applied to set-off such amount owed to the Company. Further, if the Company commences an action against such Participant (by way of claim or counterclaim and including declaratory claims), in which it is preliminarily or finally determined that such Participant engaged in a Prohibited Activity, the Participant shall reimburse the Company for all costs and fees incurred in such action, including but not limited to, the Companys reasonable attorneys fees.
d.
Stock Power . With respect to shares of Common Stock subject to rescission under paragraph 2(c), the Participant does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint the Alliance One International, Inc. Corporate Secretary or the Vice President Compensation & Benefits as his attorney to transfer on the books of the Company, with full power of substitution in the premises, any shares of Common Stock the issuance or delivery of which is rescinded in accordance with this Agreement. Such person or persons shall use the authority granted in this paragraph 2(d) to cancel any shares of Common Stock the issuance or delivery of which is rescinded under paragraph 2(c).
3.
Shareholder Rights . The Participant will have no voting, dividend or other stockholder rights with respect to Restricted Stock Units. With respect to Common Stock issued to the Participant pursuant to paragraph 2(b), the Participant will be treated as a stockholder and shall have applicable voting, dividend and other stockholder rights beginning on the actual date of issue.
4.
Assignability . The Restricted Stock Units, including any interest therein, shall not be transferable or assignable, except by the Participants will or by the laws of descent and distribution. The Restricted Stock Units have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any applicable state securities laws and no transfer or assignment of the Restricted Stock Units (or any Common Stock issued pursuant thereto) may be made in the absence of an effective registration statement under such laws or the availability of an exemption from the registration provisions thereof in respect of such transfer or assignment.
5.
Disability . For purposes of this Agreement, Disability means that the Participant has ceased active employment with the Company and its Affiliates on account of a permanent and total disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.
6.
Withholding Taxes . To the extent that the Company is required to withhold federal, state, local or foreign taxes in connection with any payment made or benefit realized by the Participant or other person under this Agreement, and the amounts available to the Company for such withholding are insufficient, it will be a condition to the receipt of such payment or the realization of such benefit that the Participant or such other person make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for payment of the balance of such taxes required to be withheld. In accordance with procedures established by the Company, the Company may withhold from Common Stock delivered to the Participant, sufficient shares of Common Stock (valued as of the preceding day) to satisfy withholding and employment taxes, or the Company shall direct the Participant to pay to the Company in cash or Common Stock (valued as of the day preceding the payment) sufficient amounts or shares to satisfy such obligation.
7.
No Right to Employment . The Plan and this Agreement will not confer upon the Participant any right with respect to the continuance of employment or other service with the Company or any Affiliate and will not interfere in any way with any right that the Company or any Affiliate would otherwise have to terminate any employment or other service of the Participant at any time. For purposes of this Agreement, the continuous employ of the Participant with the Company or an Affiliate shall not be deemed interrupted, and the Participant shall not be deemed to have ceased to be an employee of the Company or any Affiliate by reason of (a) the transfer of his or her employment among the Company and its Affiliates or (b) an approved leave of absence.
8.
Not Part of Regular Compensation . This Agreement shall not be construed as a guarantee that the Participant will earn or accrue a benefit. The Participant agrees and acknowledges that the Restricted Stock Units and any benefits that may be earned with respect thereto are not and shall not be treated as part of the Participants regular compensation for any purpose.
9.
Relation to Other Benefits . Except as specifically provided, any economic or other benefit to the Participant under this Agreement or the Plan will not be taken into account in determining any benefits to which the Participant may be entitled under any profit-sharing, retirement or other benefit or compensation plan maintained by the Company or any Affiliate and will not affect the amount of any life insurance coverage available to any beneficiary under any life insurance plan covering employees of the Company or an Affiliate.
10.
Compliance with Section 409A of the Code .
a.
This Agreement shall at all times be construed in a manner to comply with Code Section 409A, including, if applicable, compliance with any exemptions from Code Section 409A.
b.
The parties intend that all amounts realized by or payable to Participant or any other party pursuant to this Agreement will qualify as short-term deferrals within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(4) and will not be treated as deferred compensation for purposes of Code Section 409A.
c.
In no event shall any payment required to be made pursuant to this Agreement that is considered deferred compensation within the meaning of Code Section 409A (and is not otherwise exempt from the provisions thereof) be accelerated or delayed in violation of Code Section 409A.
d.
If Participant is a specified employee within the meaning of Code Section 409A, any amount payable upon Participants separation from service that is considered deferred compensation under Code Section 409A (and is not exempt from Code Section 409A) cannot be paid prior to the earlier of (i) six months after the date of Participants separation from service or (ii) the date of Participants death.
e.
The Committee and the Company and its Affiliates do not represent or guarantee to any Participant that any particular federal or state income, payroll or other tax treatment will result from the Participants participation in the Plan. The Participant is solely responsible for the proper tax reporting and timely payment of any income tax or interest for which the Participant is liable as a result of this Agreement and the Participants participation in the Plan.
11.
Change in Capital Structure . The terms of this Agreement are subject to adjustment by the Committee in accordance with Article XII of the Plan.
12.
Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
13.
Conflicts . In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Plan as in effect on the Date of Award and the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall govern. All references herein to the Plan shall mean the Plan as in effect on the Date of Award.
14.
Participant Bound by Plan . Participant hereby acknowledges that a copy of the Plan has been made available to the Participant and agrees to be bound by all the terms and provisions thereof.
15.
Binding Effect . Subject to the limitations stated above and in the Plan, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the legatees, distributees, and personal representatives of the Participant and the successors of the Company.
16.
Severability . If any provision of this Agreement should for any reason be declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then this Agreement and the grant of Restricted Stock Units hereunder shall be deemed invalid and unenforceable in its entirety due to failure of consideration.
17.
Committee Discretion . The Committee shall have all of the powers granted under the Plan, including but not limited to the authority and discretion to interpret the provisions of this Agreement and to make any decisions or take any actions necessary or advisable for the administration of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be signed by a duly authorized officer, and Participant has affixed his signature hereto.
ALLIANCE ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC .
By
President
Participant
1
Exhibit 10.1
This document constitutes part of a prospectus covering securities that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Amended and Restated
Alliance One International, Inc.
2007 Incentive Plan
Form of Grant Agreement
PERFORMANCE-BASED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
This Performance-Based Stock Unit Award Agreement (this Agreement), made effective as of the day of _________, 20__ (the Date of Award), between Alliance One International, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the Company), and (Participant), is made pursuant and subject to the provisions of the Amended and Restated Alliance One International, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (the Plan), a copy of which has been made available to the Participant.
RECITAL:
The Plan provides for the grant of Performance-based Stock Unit Awards to eligible employees designated by the Committee. The Committee has determined that Performance-based Stock Unit Awards will encourage eligible employees to contribute to the profits and growth of the Company and its Affiliates, and that the Participant can be expected to make such a contribution. The Committee does not intend that this Performance-Based Stock Unit Award be treated as performance-based compensation under Article XI of the Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.
Defined Terms . Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meaning set forth for those terms in the Plan.
2.
Performance-based Stock Unit Award . The Company grants _________________ Stock Units to the Participant as of the Date of Award specified above, subject to the terms and conditions, including the vesting requirements, set forth in this Agreement (the Performance-based Stock Units).
3.
Vesting.
a.
Performance Criteria . Except as otherwise provided in Section 3(c) hereof, vesting of the Performance-based Stock Units will depend on the Companys performance for three separate performance periods: the fiscal year ending March 31, 20__ (the One-Year Performance Period), the two-fiscal-year period ending March 31, 20__ (the Two-Year Performance Period), and the three-fiscal-year period ending March 31, 20__ (the Three-Year Performance Period; each of the One-year Performance Period, the Two-year Performance Period and the Three-year Performance Period are generically referred to as a Performance Period). The amount of the Performance-based Stock Units that will vest with respect to any Performance Period will depend on the Companys EBITDA for such Performance Period and the Debt at the end of such Performance Period. The term EBITDA shall have the meaning given to that term in the Credit Agreement dated as of July 2, 2009 among the Company, certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders from time to time parties thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent, and such Credit Agreement has been amended and may further be amended from time to time, with any adjustments as may be determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion, regardless of whether any such adjustment increases or decreases EBITDA as would otherwise be determined. The term Debt shall be used to reflect the reduction in the Companys level of consolidated net debt and shall mean, with respect to any Performance Period, the sum of the Companys consolidated long-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt and notes payable to banks minus the Companys consolidated cash and cash equivalents, each as of the end of such Performance Period. The financial items that are used in the foregoing definitions shall be determined for any Performance Period in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied by the Company, and in the event of any change in the format of presentation of the Companys consolidated financial statements from the Companys audited statement of consolidated operations and comprehensive income, consolidated balance sheet and statement of consolidated cash flows at and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20__ included in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20__, the Committee may adjust the definitions of EBITDA and Debt as used herein in any manner deemed equitable by the Committee, in its sole discretion, to account for such change in presentation.
With respect to any Performance Period, the number of Performance-based Stock Units that would vest shall be the product of the number of Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereby multiplied by the percentage (expressed as a fraction) set forth in the matrix (the Matrix) attached hereto as Exhibit A with respect to the EBITDA and Debt for such Performance Period, with the percentage to vest for any EBITDA and Debt levels between any points on the Matrix being extrapolated by the Committee in any manner determined by it in good faith (based on even weighting of EBITDA and Debt); provided that:
i.
with respect to the One-year Performance Period and the Two-Year Performance Period, only one-half of the percentage amount set forth in the Matrix with respect to the EBITDA and Debt for such Performance Period shall be used in the foregoing calculation and in no event shall the number of Performance-based Stock Units that vest for such Performance Period exceed 16.66% of the Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereby (other than to the extent such excess is the result of rounding up to the nearest whole Performance-based Stock Unit), and
ii
with respect to the Three-year Performance Period, the number of Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereunder that would vest shall be reduced, but not below zero, by the aggregate of the Performance-based Stock Units vested with respect to the One-year Performance Period and with respect to the Two-Year Performance Period.
b.
Certification . As soon as practicable after the end of the Performance Period (or, if clause (ii) or (iii) of Section 3(c) applies, as soon as practicable after termination of the Participants active employment due to Disability or death), the Committee shall certify the number of Performance-based Stock Units that will be deemed vested pursuant to this Section 3, and any fractional amount of Performance-based Stock Unit deemed vested shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. The number of Performance-based Stock Units so certified with respect to a Performance Period shall be deemed to be vested as of the last day of such Performance Period. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Committee in its discretion may adjust the number of Performance-based Stock Units that would otherwise be deemed vested pursuant to this Section in recognition of such performance or other factors that the Committee deems relevant. Except to the extent any other provision hereof provides for earlier forfeiture, Performance-based Stock Units that are not certified by the Committee as vested will be deemed forfeited as of the last day of the Three-year Performance Period.
c.
Effect of Termination of Employment . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, all of a Participants vested and unvested Performance-based Stock Units shall be forfeited, and the Participant shall not be entitled to any payment with respect to the Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereby, upon termination of the Participant from the employ of the Company and its Affiliates for any reason at any time on or prior to the first anniversary of the Date of Award. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, except as otherwise set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) below, all of a Participants vested and unvested Performance-based Stock Units shall be forfeited, and the Participant shall not be entitled to any payment with respect to the Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereby, upon termination of the Participant from the employ of the Company and its Affiliates at any time on or prior to the last day of the Three-year Performance Period.
i.
Retirement or Involuntary Termination Without Cause . Upon the Participants Retirement, or the involuntary termination of the Participant from the employ of the Company and its Affiliates without Cause, in either case prior to the last day of the Three-year Performance Period:
(1)
The provisions of Section 3(a) hereof regarding the vesting of Performance-based Stock Units shall apply, except to the extent provided in clauses (2) and (3) of this clause (i);
(2)
If such Retirement or involuntary termination of employment without Cause occurs on or prior to the last day of the Two-year Performance Period, no Performance-based Stock Units shall vest with respect to the Two-Year Performance Period;
(3)
Subject to the Committees discretion to adjust the number of Performance-based Stock Units that vest hereunder based on other factors pursuant to Section 3(b), the Performance-based Stock Units that would otherwise become vested at the end of the Three-year Performance Period pursuant to Section 3(a) (if any) shall be prorated (rounded up to the nearest whole unit) based on the ratio of the number of calendar months (rounded up to the nearest whole month) during a Performance Period that the Participant remained in the continuous employ of the Company or one of its Affiliates through the date of such Retirement or involuntary termination of employment without Cause, to 36. Any Performance-based Stock Units not vested in accordance with this clause (i) shall be forfeited and the Participant shall not be entitled to any payment with respect to such forfeited Performance-based Stock Units.
For purposes of this Agreement, the Participants termination will be deemed to be an involuntary termination without Cause unless prior to such termination the Committee determines that the Participant engaged in a Prohibited Activity (as defined in Section 4(c)) and that the Participant is being terminated Cause.
Any Performance-based Stock Units that are vested at the time of the Participants Retirement or the involuntary termination of the Participant from the employ of the Company and its Affiliates without Cause shall be settled promptly after such Retirement or involuntary termination, but in no event later than December 31 of the year in which such Retirement or involuntary termination occurs, or if such Retirement or involuntary termination occurs in October, November or December, by March 15 of the following year. Any Performance-based Stock Units that vest after such Retirement and involuntary term shall be settled at the time specified in Section 4(a) hereof.
See Exhibit B attached to this Agreement for an example of how the provisions of this clause (i) apply.
ii.
Disability . Upon the termination of the Participants active employment with the Company and its Affiliates prior to the last day of a Performance Period and on account of the Participants Disability:
(1)
The provisions of Section 3(a) shall not apply with respect to the vesting of any Performance-based Stock Units with respect to such Performance Period;
(2)
Any Performance-based Stock Units that become vested pursuant to this clause (ii) will be deemed to have vested on the date the Participants active employment terminated on account of Disability; and
(3)
Subject to the Committees discretion to adjust the number of Performance-based Stock Units that vest hereunder based on other factors pursuant to Section 3(b), the number of Performance-based Stock Units that vest pursuant to this clause (ii) shall be the number of Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereby minus the aggregate amount of Performance-based Stock Units that had vested with respect to any Performance Period the last day of which the Participant had been in the continuous employ of the Company, with such difference pro rated based on the ratio of the number of calendar months (rounded up to the nearest whole month) during the Three-year Performance Period that the Participant remained in the continuous employ of the Company or one of its Affiliates through the date the Participants active employment terminated on account of Disability to the 36 months constituting the Three-year Performance Period, such amount rounded up to the nearest whole unit. Any Performance-based Stock Units not vested at the time of the Participants termination of employment on account of the Participants Disability that do not vest in accordance with this clause (ii) shall be forfeited effective immediately after the Committees certification of the Performance-based Stock Units deemed vested pursuant to this clause (ii).
(4)
Any Performance-based Stock Units that are vested on the date the Participants active employment terminated on account of Disability, including any Performance-based Stock Units that are deemed vested as of such date by virtue of this clause (ii), shall be settled promptly after such termination of active employment, but in no event later than December 31 of the year in which such termination of active employment occurs or, if such termination of active employment occurs in October, November or December, by March 15 of the following year.
See Exhibit B attached to this Agreement for an example of how the provisions of this clause (ii) apply.
iii.
Death . Upon termination of Participants employment with the Company and its Affiliates on account of the Participants death prior to the last day of a Performance Period:
(1)
The provisions of Section 3(a) shall not apply with respect to the vesting of any Performance-based Stock Units with respect to such Performance Period;
(2)
Any Performance-based Stock Units that become vested pursuant to this clause (iii) will be deemed to have vested on the Participants date of death; and
(3)
Subject to the Committees discretion to adjust the number of Performance-based Stock Units that vest hereunder based on other factors pursuant to Section 3(b), the number of Performance-based Stock Units that vest pursuant to this clause (iii) shall be the number of Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereby minus the aggregate amount of Performance-based Stock Units that had vested with respect to any Performance Period the last day of which the Participant had been in the continuous employ of the Company, with such difference pro rated based on the ratio of the number of calendar months (rounded up to the nearest whole month) during the Three-year Performance Period that the Participant remained in the continuous employ of the Company or one of its Affiliates through the date the Participants death to the 36 months constituting the Three-year Performance Period, such amount rounded up to the nearest whole unit. Any Performance-based Stock Units not vested at the time of the Participants death that do not vest in accordance with this clause (iii) shall be forfeited effective immediately after the Committees certification of the Performance-based Stock Units deemed vested pursuant to this clause (iii).
(4)
Any Performance-based Stock Units that are vested on the date the Participants death, including any Performance-based Stock Units that are deemed vested as of such date by virtue of this clause (iii), shall be settled promptly after the Participants death, but in no event later than December 31 of the year in which the Participants Death occurs or, if the Participants death occurs in October, November or December, by March 15 of the following year.
See Exhibit B attached to this Agreement for an example of how the provisions of this clause (iii) apply.
d.
Change in Control Before Last Day of Performance Period . In the event of a Change in Control of the Company prior to the last day of a Performance Period and prior to the termination of the Participants employment, the provisions of Article X of the Plan shall apply with respect to the vesting of any Performance-based Stock Units with respect to such Performance Period, and the Committee shall determine whether and to what extent the Participants Performance-based Stock Units will be deemed to be vested and the time of settlement of such Performance-based Stock Units.
4.
Terms and Conditions .
a.
Time of Settlement . Except to the extent the timing of settlement is expressly provided otherwise in Section 3(c) or the Committee determines another time for settlement of Performance-based Stock Units vested pursuant to Section 3(d), the Company will effect settlement of all Performance-based Stock Units that are or become vested as of the last day of the Three-year Performance Period as soon as practicable after the Committee shall have certified the number of Performance-based Stock Units deemed vested with respect to the Three-year Performance Period, but in any event no later than December 31 of the calendar year in which the Three-year Performance Period ends.
b.
Manner of Settlement . Vested Performance-based Stock Units shall be settled by the Company in shares of Common Stock, cash or a combination thereof in accordance with this Section 4(b). At its option, and with respect to any vested Performance-based Stock Unit, the Company will:
i.
issue to the Participant (or the Participants estate, if the Participant is deceased) one whole share of Common Stock for such vested Performance-based Stock Unit; or
ii
pay to the Participant (or the Participants estate, if the Participant is deceased) an amount of cash equal, for such vested Performance-based Stock Unit, to the closing price for a share of Common Stock, as reported on the primary securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, on the date the Committee certified pursuant to Section 3(b) hereof the vesting of any Performance-based Stock Unit with respect to the Three-year Performance Unit (or, with respect to any settlement of any Performance-based Restricted Stock Unit that is vested as of the date of or as a result of a termination of the employment of the Participant as described in Sections 3(c)(i) through (iii), on such date of the termination of the employment), and if such date is not a day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock, then on the next succeeding day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock.
c.
Misconduct .
i.
The Committee shall have the authority to cancel, rescind, cause the forfeiture of or otherwise limit or restrict any vested or nonvested Performance-based Stock Units awarded under this Agreement if the Committee determines that the Participant has (i) violated the Companys Code of Conduct (as in effect from time to time); (ii) violated any law (other than misdemeanor traffic violations) and thereby injured or damaged the business reputation or prospects of the Company or an Affiliate; or (iii) engaged in intentional misconduct that caused, or materially contributed to, the need for a substantial restatement (voluntary or required) of the Companys financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the foregoing enumerated items being hereinafter referred to, individually or collectively, as a Prohibited Activity).
ii.
In the event the Committee in its discretion determines that the Participant has engaged in a Prohibited Activity at any time prior to the later of six months after the settlement of any vested Performance-based Stock Units or the lapse of the Three-year Performance Period, the Committee may rescind the settlement of any Performance-based Stock Units hereunder, provided the Committee takes such action within two years after the occurrence of the Prohibited Activity. Upon such rescission, the Company at its sole option, may require the Participant to (a) deliver and convey to the Company the shares of Common Stock issued in settlement of the Performance-based Stock Units awarded hereunder; (b) in the case any such shares of Common Stock have been sold in a market transaction to an unrelated party by the Participant, pay to the Company an amount equal to the proceeds from the sale of such shares; (c) in the case any such shares of Common Stock have otherwise been disposed of by the Participant, pay to the Company an amount in cash equal to the product of the number of such shares multiplied by the closing price for a share of Common Stock, as reported on the primary securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, on the date the Committee determined that the Participant has engaged in the Prohibited Activity pursuant to Section 4(c) hereof, and if such date is not a day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock, then on the next succeeding day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock; (d) pay to the Company an amount of cash equal to the amount of cash paid by the Company in settlement of any Performance Stock Units awarded hereunder. The Company shall be entitled to set-off any such amount owed to the Company against any amount or benefit owed to the Participant by the Company, and the Participant shall forfeit the amount or benefit applied to set-off such amount owed to the Company. Further, if the Company commences an action against such Participant (by way of claim or counterclaim and including declaratory claims), in which it is preliminarily or finally determined that such Participant engaged in a Prohibited Activity, the Participant shall reimburse the Company for all costs and fees incurred in such action, including but not limited to, the Companys reasonable attorneys fees.
5.
Assignability . The Performance-based Stock Units, including any interest therein, shall not be transferable or assignable, except by the Participants will or by the laws of descent and distribution. The Performance-based Stock Units have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any applicable state securities laws and no transfer or assignment of the Performance-based Stock Units (or any Common Stock issued pursuant thereto) may be made in the absence of an effective registration statement under such laws or the availability of an exemption from the registration provisions thereof in respect of such transfer or assignment.
6.
Shareholder Rights . The Participant will have no voting, dividend or other shareholder right with respect to the Performance-based Stock Units. With respect to the Common Stock issued to the Participant pursuant to this Agreement, the Participant will be treated as a stockholder and shall have applicable voting, dividend and other stockholder rights beginning on the actual date of issue.
7.
Withholding Taxes . To the extent that the Company is required to withhold federal, state, local or foreign taxes in connection with any payment made or benefit realized by the Participant or other person under this Agreement, and the amounts available to the Company for such withholding are insufficient, it will be a condition to the receipt of such payment or the realization of such benefit that the Participant or such other person make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for payment of the balance of such taxes required to be withheld. In accordance with procedures established by the Company, the Company may withhold from Common Stock delivered to the Participant, sufficient shares of Common Stock (valued as of the preceding day) to satisfy withholding and employment taxes, or the Company shall direct the Participant to pay to the Company in cash or Common Stock (valued as of the day preceding the payment) sufficient amounts or shares to satisfy such obligation.
8.
No Right to Employment . The Plan and this Agreement will not confer upon the Participant any right with respect to the continuance of employment or other service with the Company or any Affiliate and will not interfere in any way with any right that the Company or any Affiliate would otherwise have to terminate any employment or other service of the Participant at any time. For purposes of this Agreement, the continuous employ of the Participant with the Company or an Affiliate shall not be deemed interrupted, and the Participant shall not be deemed to have ceased to be an employee of the Company or any Affiliate by reason of (a) the transfer of his or her employment among the Company and its Affiliates or (b) an approved leave of absence.
9.
Not Part of Regular Compensation . The Participant agrees and acknowledges that benefits under this Agreement are subject to the Companys achievement of certain performance objectives and are further subject to the Committees discretion to decrease the number of Performance-based Stock Units that vest. This Agreement shall not be construed as a guarantee that the Participant will earn or accrue a benefit. The Participant agrees and acknowledges that the Performance-based Stock Units and any benefits that may be earned with respect thereto are not and shall not be treated as part of the Participants regular compensation for any purpose.
10.
Relation to Other Benefits . Except as specifically provided, any economic or other benefit to the Participant under this Agreement or the Plan will not be taken into account in determining any benefits to which the Participant may be entitled under any profit-sharing, retirement or other benefit or compensation plan maintained by the Company or any Affiliate and will not affect the amount of any life insurance coverage available to any beneficiary under any life insurance plan covering employees of the Company or an Affiliate.
11.
Compliance with Section 409A of the Code.
a.
This Agreement shall at all times be construed in a manner to comply with Code Section 409A, including, if applicable, compliance with any exemptions from Code Section 409A.
b.
The parties intend that all amounts realized by or payable to Participant or any other party pursuant to this Agreement will qualify as short-term deferrals within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(4) and will not be treated as deferred compensation for purposes of Code Section 409A.
c.
In no event shall any payment required to be made pursuant to this Agreement that is considered deferred compensation within the meaning of Code Section 409A (and is not otherwise exempt from the provisions thereof) be accelerated or delayed in violation of Code Section 409A.
d.
If Participant is a specified employee within the meaning of Code Section 409A, any amount payable upon Participants separation from service that is considered deferred compensation under Code Section 409A (and is not exempt from Code Section 409A) cannot be paid prior to the earlier of (i) six months after the date of Participants separation from service or (ii) the date of Participants death.
e.
The Committee and the Company and its Affiliates do not represent or guarantee to any Participant that any particular federal or state income, payroll or other tax treatment will result from the Participants participation in the Plan. The Participant is solely responsible for the proper tax reporting and timely payment of any income tax or interest for which the Participant is liable as a result of this Agreement and the Participants participation in the Plan.
12.
Retirement . For purposes of this Agreement, Retirement means the Participants early, normal or delayed retirement under the primary pension plan sponsored by the Company or an Affiliate in which the Participant is eligible to participate. The determination of the appropriate pension plan for the purpose of the foregoing definition shall be made by the Committee, and its determination shall be conclusive.
13.
Disability . For purposes of this Agreement, Disability means that the Participant has ceased active employment with the Company and its Affiliates on account of a permanent and total disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.
14.
Change in Capital Structure . The terms of this Agreement are subject to adjustment by the Committee in accordance with Article XII of the Plan, subject to the limitations imposed by Article XI of the Plan.
15.
Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
16.
Conflicts . In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Plan as in effect on the Date of Award and the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall govern. All references herein to the Plan shall mean the Plan as in effect on the Date of Award.
17.
Participant Bound by Plan . Participant hereby acknowledges that a copy of the Plan has been made available to the Participant and Participant agrees to be bound by all the terms and provisions thereof.
18.
Binding Effect . Subject to the limitations stated herein and in the Plan, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the legatees, distributees, and personal representatives of the Participant and the successors of the Company.
19.
Severability . If any provision of this Agreement should for any reason be declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then this Agreement and the grant of Performance-based Stock Units hereunder shall be deemed invalid and unenforceable in its entirety due to failure of consideration.
20.
Committee Discretion . The Committee shall have all of the powers granted under the Plan, including but not limited to the powers granted under Article III of the Plan and the authority and discretion to interpret the provisions of this Agreement and to make any decisions or take any actions necessary or advisable for the administration of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be signed by a duly authorized officer, and Participant has affixed his or her signature hereto.
ALLIANCE ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC
By __________________________________
Participant: ___________________________
1
EXHIBIT A
PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT PLAN PAYOUT MATRIX
[matrix to be inserted here]
Note: Matrix based on outstanding share balance of ____ shares. Should share balance change or dividends paid, the matrix and resulting payouts will vary.
2
EXHIBIT B
PRO-RATION EXAMPLES
The following examples are presented solely to illustrate the operation of certain provisions of the Agreement and are not intended to be, and should not be construed as, any indication or estimate of future performance of the Company or of the levels of awards that would actually vest or be paid under this Agreement
Example 1 Section 3(c)(i):
The Participant is granted 1,000 Performance-based Stock Units on June 9, 2010 for Performance Periods ending on March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. The Participant is continuously employed by the Company until the close of business on June 30, 2011, when the Participants employment is terminated by the Company without Cause.
On July 15, 2011, the Committee certifies that 4% of the Performance-based Stock Units vested for the One-year Performance Period based on EBITDA and Debt for such Performance Period of 8% on the Matrix. In July 2012, the Committee certifies that, based on EBITDA and Debt levels for such Performance Period intersecting at the 62% level on the Matrix, 16.66% of the Performance-based Stock Units would have vested for the Two-year Performance Period (the 16.66% limitation under Section 3(a)(i) applies to the Two-year Performance Period). In July 2013, the Committee certifies that based on EBITDA and Debt levels for such Performance Period intersecting at the 123% the relevant number of Performance-based Stock Units vested for the Three-year Performance Period. The Committee elects not to exercise its discretion to adjust the number of Performance-based Stock units that will vest with respect to any of the Performance Periods.
For the One-year Performance Period, 40 Performance-based Stock Units (4% of 1,000) would vest pursuant to Section 3(a)(i) since the Participant had remained in the continuous employ of the Company through the last day of the One-year Performance Period. Because employment was terminated under circumstances contemplated by Section 3(c)(i) after the end of the One-year Performance Period but prior to the end of the Second-year Performance Period and Third-year Performance Period, the timing of settlement of the Performance-based Stock Units vested as of such termination of employment, any vesting with respect to Second-year Performance Period and Third-year Performance Period, are governed by Section 3(c)(i).
The Participant would be entitled to settlement on or prior to December 31, 2011of the 40 Performance-based Stock Units vested as of the date of such termination of employment. If any of these Performance-based Stock Units are settled in cash, the closing date reference price for the Companys Common Stock is the date of such termination of employment, or if that is not a trading day then the next succeeding trading day.
For the Two-year Performance Period, no Performance-based Stock Units will vest (see Section 3(c)(i)(2)), notwithstanding performance levels that would indicate the vesting of 167 Performance-based Stock Units (16.66% of 1,000, rounded up to the nearest whole number).
For the Three-year Performance Period, the 1,230 Performance-based Stock Units (123% of 1,000) less the 40 Performance-based Stock Units vested with respect to the One-year Performance Period, or 1,190, that would otherwise vest is prorated by the number of whole months (rounded up) in the Performance Period during which the Participant was employed (or, 15) divided by the total 36 months in the Performance Period, resulting in 496 Performance-based Stock Units vesting (again, rounding up to the nearest whole share). The Participant would be entitled to settlement of these Performance-based Stock Units on or prior to December 31, 2013. The remaining unvested Performance-based Stock Units would be deemed forfeited on June 30, 2011, the date of termination of employment. If any of these Performance-based Stock Units are settled in cash, the closing date reference price for the Companys Common Stock is the date of the Committees certification with respect to the Three-year Performance Period, or if that is not a trading day then the next succeeding trading day.
The foregoing example would be equally applicable if the Participant had instead retired at the close of business on June 30, 2011.
Example 2 Sections 3(c)(ii) and (iii):
The Participant is granted 1,000 Performance-based Stock Units on June 9, 2010 for Performance Periods ending on March 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. The Participant is continuously employed by the Company until the close of business on June 30, 2011, when the Participants employment is terminated on account of the Participants Disability.
On July 15, 2011, the Committee certifies that 4% of the Performance-based Stock Units vested for the One-year Performance Period based on EBITDA and Debt for such Performance Period of 8% on the Matrix. At the same meeting the Committee took action with respect to certifying the vesting of Performance-based Stock Units of the Participant as a result of the termination of employment on account of the Participants Disability. Note that since the termination of employment occurred after the end of the One-year Performance Period, Section 3(a)(i) governs the vesting of for the One-year Performance Period and Section 3(c)(ii) governs the vesting of Units with respect to the Two-year Performance Period and the Three-year Performance Period. Section 3(c)(ii) also governs the timing of the settlement of all Performance-based Stock Units. The Committee elects not to exercise its discretion to adjust the number of Performance-based Stock units that will vest with respect to any of the Performance Periods.
For the One-year Performance Period, 40 Performance-based Stock Units (4% of 1,000) would vest since the Participant had remained in the continuous employ of the Company through the last day of the One-year Performance Period. Such 40 Performance-based Stock Units are deemed vested as of March 31, 2011, the last day of the One-year Performance Period. The Participant would be entitled to settlement of these Performance-based Stock Units on or prior to December 31, 2011.
The amount of the award, 1,000 Performance-based Stock Units, less the 40 Performance-based Stock Units that vested with respect to the One-year Performance Period, or 960 Performance-based Stock Units, would be prorated by the number of whole months (rounded up) in the Three-year Performance Period during which the Participant was employed (or, 15) divided by the total 36 months in the Three-year Performance Period, resulting in 400 Performance-based Stock Units vesting pursuant to Section (3)(c)(ii) (rounding up to the nearest whole share). The Participant would be entitled to settlement of these Performance-based Stock Units on or prior to December 31, 2011.
If any of these Performance-based Stock Units are settled in cash, the closing date reference price for the Companys Common Stock is the date of such termination of employment, or if that is not a trading day then the next succeeding trading day.
The remaining unvested Performance-based Stock Units would be deemed forfeited on June 30, 2011, the date of termination of employment.
The foregoing example would be equally applicable if the cause of the termination of the Participants employment of June 30, 2011 had been the Participants death, except that settlement would be made to the Participants estate.
3
Exhibit 10.2
This document constitutes part of a prospectus covering securities that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Amended and Restated
Alliance One International, Inc.
2007 Incentive Plan
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT, dated the ________ day of ___________, 20__, between Alliance One International, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the Company), and ______________ (Participant), is made pursuant and subject to the provisions of the Amended and Restated Alliance One International, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (the Plan), a copy of which has been made available to the Participant. All terms used herein that are defined in the Plan have the same meaning given them in the Plan.
1.
Award of Stock Units . Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Company, on _______ __, 20__ (the Date of Award), awarded the Participant, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and subject further to the terms and conditions set forth herein, a Stock Unit Award covering ________ shares of Common Stock of the Company (the Restricted Stock Units).
2.
Terms and Conditions .
a.
Vesting . Except as provided in paragraph 2(c), the Participants interest in the Restricted Stock Units shall vest and become non-forfeitable on the first date that one of the requirements in the following sentence is satisfied. The requirements of this sentence are satisfied if the Participant remains in the continuous employ of the Company or an Affiliate from the Date of Award until the earliest of (i) the third anniversary of the Date of Award, (ii) the date of the Participants death, (iii) the date of termination of the Participants employment on account of Disability, or (iv) the date of a Change in Control. In addition, except as provided in paragraph 2(c), a portion of the Participants interest in the Restricted Stock Units shall vest and become non-forfeitable on the date of termination of the Participants employment by the Company without Cause (Involuntary Termination), if the date of Involuntary Termination precedes the occurrence of any of the events specified in clauses (i) through (iv) of the preceding sentence. In such event, the number of Restricted Stock Units that shall vest upon an Involuntary Termination shall be prorated (rounded up to the nearest whole unit) based on the ratio of the number of calendar months (rounded up to the nearest whole month) that the Participant has remained in the continuous employ of the Company or an Affiliate from the Date of Award through the date of the Involuntary Termination to a 36-month vesting period. Restricted Stock Units that have not vested in accordance with the preceding sentences of this paragraph 2(a) shall be forfeited, and the Participant shall have no further rights with respect to the Restricted Stock Units, upon the termination of the Participants employment with the Company and its Affiliates other than with respect to Restricted Stock Units that become vested as a result of the Participants death or Involuntary Termination or on account of Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, the Participants termination of employment by the Company will be deemed to be an involuntary termination without Cause unless prior to such termination of employment the Committee determines that the Participant engaged in a Prohibited Activity (as defined in paragraph 2(c).
b.
Settlement . If the Participant vests in some or all of the Restricted Stock Units pursuant to paragraph 2(a), the vested Restricted Stock Units shall be settled by the Company in shares of Common Stock, cash or a combination thereof, in accordance with this paragraph. As soon as practicable after any Restricted Stock Unit vests, but in any event no later than December 31 in the calendar year in which the Restricted Stock Units vest, the Company will at its option with respect to any such Restricted Stock Unit so vested:
i.
issue to the Participant (or his or her estate, if the Participant is deceased) one whole share of Common Stock for such vested Restricted Stock Unit; or
ii
pay to the Participant (or his or her estate, if the Participant is deceased) an amount of cash equal, for such vested Performance-based Stock Unit, to the closing price for a share of Common Stock, as reported on the primary securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, on the date the Committee certified the vesting of such Performance-based Stock Unit pursuant to Section 3(b) hereof, and if such date is not a day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock, then on the next succeeding day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Restricted Stock Units become vested pursuant to clause (ii), (iii) or (iv) of paragraph 2(a), or pursuant to paragraph 2(a) due to Involuntary Termination, at any time in October, November or December, the deadline for settling such vested Restricted Stock Units shall be March 15 in the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which such Restricted Stock Units vest.
c.
Misconduct . The Committee shall have the authority to cancel, rescind, cause the forfeiture of or otherwise limit or restrict any non-vested Restricted Stock Units awarded under this Agreement if the Committee determines that the Participant has (i) violated the Companys Code of Conduct (as in effect from time to time); (ii) violated any law (other than misdemeanor traffic violations) and thereby injured or damaged the business reputation or prospects of the Company or an Affiliate; or (iii) engaged in intentional misconduct that caused, or materially contributed to, the need for a substantial restatement (voluntary or required) of the Companys financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the foregoing enumerated items being hereinafter referred to, individually or collectively, as a Prohibited Activity).
Furthermore, in the event the Committee in its discretion determines that the Participant has engaged in a Prohibited Activity at any time prior to the later of six months after the settlement of any vested Restricted Stock Units pursuant to paragraph 2(b), the Committee may rescind the settlement of any Restricted Stock Units hereunder, provided the Committee takes such action within two years after the occurrence of the Prohibited Activity. Upon such rescission, the Company at its sole option, may require the Participant to (a) deliver and convey to the Company the shares of Common Stock issued in settlement of the Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder; (b) in the case any such shares of Common Stock have been sold in a market transaction to an unrelated party by the Participant, pay to the Company an amount equal to the proceeds from the sale of such shares; (c) in the case any such shares of Common Stock have otherwise been disposed of by the Participant, pay to the Company an amount in cash equal to the product of the number of such shares multiplied by the closing price for a share of Common Stock, as reported on the primary securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, on the date the Committee determined that the Participant has engaged in the Prohibited Activity pursuant to paragraph 2(c) hereof, and if such date is not a day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock, then on the next succeeding day on which such securities exchange is open for trading shares of the Common Stock; (d) pay to the Company an amount of cash equal to the amount of cash paid by the Company in settlement of any Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder. The Company shall be entitled to set-off any such amount owed to the Company against any amount or benefit owed to the Participant by the Company, and the Participant shall forfeit the amount or benefit applied to set-off such amount owed to the Company. Further, if the Company commences an action against such Participant (by way of claim or counterclaim and including declaratory claims), in which it is preliminarily or finally determined that such Participant engaged in a Prohibited Activity, the Participant shall reimburse the Company for all costs and fees incurred in such action, including but not limited to, the Companys reasonable attorneys fees.
d.
Stock Power . With respect to shares of Common Stock subject to rescission under paragraph 2(c), the Participant does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint the Alliance One International, Inc. Corporate Secretary or the Vice President Compensation & Benefits as his attorney to transfer on the books of the Company, with full power of substitution in the premises, any shares of Common Stock the issuance or delivery of which is rescinded in accordance with this Agreement. Such person or persons shall use the authority granted in this paragraph 2(d) to cancel any shares of Common Stock the issuance or delivery of which is rescinded under paragraph 2(c).
3.
Shareholder Rights . The Participant will have no voting, dividend or other stockholder rights with respect to Restricted Stock Units. With respect to Common Stock issued to the Participant pursuant to paragraph 2(b), the Participant will be treated as a stockholder and shall have applicable voting, dividend and other stockholder rights beginning on the actual date of issue.
4.
Assignabilit y. The Restricted Stock Units, including any interest therein, shall not be transferable or assignable, except by the Participants will or by the laws of descent and distribution. The Restricted Stock Units have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any applicable state securities laws and no transfer or assignment of the Restricted Stock Units (or any Common Stock issued pursuant thereto) may be made in the absence of an effective registration statement under such laws or the availability of an exemption from the registration provisions thereof in respect of such transfer or assignment.
5.
Disability . For purposes of this Agreement, Disability means that the Participant has ceased active employment with the Company and its Affiliates on account of a permanent and total disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.
6.
Withholding Taxes . To the extent that the Company is required to withhold federal, state, local or foreign taxes in connection with any payment made or benefit realized by the Participant or other person under this Agreement, and the amounts available to the Company for such withholding are insufficient, it will be a condition to the receipt of such payment or the realization of such benefit that the Participant or such other person make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for payment of the balance of such taxes required to be withheld. In accordance with procedures established by the Company, the Company may withhold from Common Stock delivered to the Participant, sufficient shares of Common Stock (valued as of the preceding day) to satisfy withholding and employment taxes, or the Company shall direct the Participant to pay to the Company in cash or Common Stock (valued as of the day preceding the payment) sufficient amounts or shares to satisfy such obligation.
7.
No Right to Employment . The Plan and this Agreement will not confer upon the Participant any right with respect to the continuance of employment or other service with the Company or any Affiliate and will not interfere in any way with any right that the Company or any Affiliate would otherwise have to terminate any employment or other service of the Participant at any time. For purposes of this Agreement, the continuous employ of the Participant with the Company or an Affiliate shall not be deemed interrupted, and the Participant shall not be deemed to have ceased to be an employee of the Company or any Affiliate by reason of (a) the transfer of his or her employment among the Company and its Affiliates or (b) an approved leave of absence.
8.
Not Part of Regular Compensation . This Agreement shall not be construed as a guarantee that the Participant will earn or accrue a benefit. The Participant agrees and acknowledges that the Restricted Stock Units and any benefits that may be earned with respect thereto are not and shall not be treated as part of the Participants regular compensation for any purpose.
9.
Relation to Other Benefits . Except as specifically provided, any economic or other benefit to the Participant under this Agreement or the Plan will not be taken into account in determining any benefits to which the Participant may be entitled under any profit-sharing, retirement or other benefit or compensation plan maintained by the Company or any Affiliate and will not affect the amount of any life insurance coverage available to any beneficiary under any life insurance plan covering employees of the Company or an Affiliate.
10.
Compliance with Section 409A of the Code .
a.
This Agreement shall at all times be construed in a manner to comply with Code Section 409A, including, if applicable, compliance with any exemptions from Code Section 409A.
b.
The parties intend that all amounts realized by or payable to Participant or any other party pursuant to this Agreement will qualify as short-term deferrals within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(4) and will not be treated as deferred compensation for purposes of Code Section 409A.
c.
In no event shall any payment required to be made pursuant to this Agreement that is considered deferred compensation within the meaning of Code Section 409A (and is not otherwise exempt from the provisions thereof) be accelerated or delayed in violation of Code Section 409A.
d.
If Participant is a specified employee within the meaning of Code Section 409A, any amount payable upon Participants separation from service that is considered deferred compensation under Code Section 409A (and is not exempt from Code Section 409A) cannot be paid prior to the earlier of (i) six months after the date of Participants separation from service or (ii) the date of Participants death.
e.
The Committee and the Company and its Affiliates do not represent or guarantee to any Participant that any particular federal or state income, payroll or other tax treatment will result from the Participants participation in the Plan. The Participant is solely responsible for the proper tax reporting and timely payment of any income tax or interest for which the Participant is liable as a result of this Agreement and the Participants participation in the Plan.
11.
Change in Capital Structure . The terms of this Agreement are subject to adjustment by the Committee in accordance with Article XII of the Plan.
12.
Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
13.
Conflicts . In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Plan as in effect on the Date of Award and the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall govern. All references herein to the Plan shall mean the Plan as in effect on the Date of Award.
14.
Participant Bound by Plan . Participant hereby acknowledges that a copy of the Plan has been made available to the Participant and agrees to be bound by all the terms and provisions thereof.
15.
Binding Effect . Subject to the limitations stated above and in the Plan, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the legatees, distributees, and personal representatives of the Participant and the successors of the Company.
16.
Severability . If any provision of this Agreement should for any reason be declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then this Agreement and the grant of Restricted Stock Units hereunder shall be deemed invalid and unenforceable in its entirety due to failure of consideration.
17.
Committee Discretion . The Committee shall have all of the powers granted under the Plan, including but not limited to the authority and discretion to interpret the provisions of this Agreement and to make any decisions or take any actions necessary or advisable for the administration of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be signed by a duly authorized officer, and Participant has affixed his signature hereto.
ALLIANCE ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
By
President
Participant
1