PROXY STATEMENT

2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by and on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “ Board of Directors ” or “ Board ”) of Lightwave Logic, Inc. of proxies to be voted at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 8, 2010 at the Hilton Wilmington/Christiana, 100 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713 and at any adjournments thereof (the “ Annual Meeting ”).  In this Proxy Statement, Lightwave Logic, Inc. is referred to as “ we ,” “ us ,” “ our ,” “ Company ” or “ Lightwave Logic ” unless the context indicates otherwise. The Annual Meeting has been called to consider and take action on the following proposals: (i) to elect seven (7) Directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified; (ii) to approve an amendment to paragraph 4 of the Company’s 2007 Employee Stock Plan (the “ Plan ”) to increase the number of shares of Company common stock available for issuance under the Plan from 3,500,000 to 6,500,000; (iii) to ratify the appointment of Morison Cogen LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010; and (iv) to consider and take action upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting.  However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote on such other matters and/or for other nominees in accordance with their best judgment. The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote in favor of each of the Director Nominees and each of the proposals.   Only holders of record of Common Stock of the Company at the close of business on June 16, 2010   (the “ Record Date ”) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

The principal executive offices of our Company are located at 121 Continental Drive, Suite 110, Newark, Delaware 19713 and our telephone number is 302-356-2717.  The approximate date on which this Proxy Statement, the proxy card and other accompanying materials are first being sent or given to stockholders is June 16, 2010.  A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 is enclosed with these materials, but should not be considered proxy solicitation material.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on July 8, 2010.

The Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 and a form of proxy card are under the “Investor Info” page of the Company’s website at www.lightwavelogic.com.

1

INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING

Who is entitled to vote?

Stockholders as of the close of business on June 16, 2010 (the “ Record Date ”) are entitled to vote. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on the Record Date. Stockholders are not entitled to cumulative voting.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

All stockholders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend.

What do I need to be admitted to the Annual Meeting?

In order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, a stockholder must present proof of ownership of Lightwave Logic stock on the Record Date. Any holder of a proxy from a stockholder must present the proxy card, properly executed. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must present proof of your ownership, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to be admitted to the meeting. All shareholders must also present a form of personal identification in order to be admitted to the meeting.

What am I being asked to vote on at the meeting?

We are asking our shareholders to elect directors, amend our 2007 Employee Stock Plan, and to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

How many votes are needed for approval of each item?

Proposal Number 1 . Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy, meaning the seven nominees receiving the most votes will be elected as directors. Stockholders are not entitled to cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors.

Proposal Number 2 . The amendment to our 2007 Employee Stock Plan will be approved if a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter vote in favor of the proposal.

Proposal Number 3 . The appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm will be ratified if a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter vote in favor of the proposal.

What constitutes a quorum?

As of the Record Date, 42,077,042 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. The presence, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of these outstanding shares is necessary to constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.

2

How do I vote?

Record Holders : Stockholders may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, or by proxy via the proxy card, or via telephone or internet as instructed on the proxy card. If you will be returning your vote by use of the proxy card, indicate your voting preferences on the proxy card, sign and date it, and return it in the prepaid envelope provided with this Proxy Statement. If you return a signed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preferences, the proxies named in your proxy card will vote FOR all proposals on your behalf. You have the right to revoke your proxy any time before the meeting by (1) notifying the Company’s Secretary, or (2) returning a later-dated proxy. You may also revoke your proxy by voting in person at the meeting.

If you hold your shares in “street name” : Your broker, bank or other nominee will ask for your instructions, generally by means of a voting instruction form. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank or brokerage firm, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the bank or broker, to be able to vote at the meeting.

What is the difference between being a “record holder” and “holding shares in street name?”

Most stockholders of the Company hold their shares through a Nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Record Holders : If your shares are registered directly in your name with our Company’s transfer agent, StockTrans, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by the Company. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for you to use.

If you hold your shares in “street name” : If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a Nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares which are held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your Nominee, who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to these shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your Nominee on how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request, complete and deliver a proxy from your Nominee. Your Nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the Nominee how to vote your shares.

What happens if I return my signed proxy card but forget to indicate how I want my shares of common stock voted?

If you sign, date and return your proxy and do not mark how you want to vote, your proxy will be counted as a vote “FOR” all of the nominees for directors, “FOR” the approval of the amendment to the Company’s 2007 Employee Stock Plan, and “FOR” the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm. 

3

What happens if I do not instruct my broker how to vote or if I mark “abstain” or “withhold authority” on the proxy?

If you mark your proxy “abstain” or “withhold authority,” your vote will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal or the election of the applicable director. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote, your broker may vote for you on “routine” proposals but not on “non-routine” proposals. The ratification of our auditor is considered routine, but the election of directors is non-routine. Therefore, if you do not vote on the election of directors or provide voting instructions, your broker will not be allowed to vote your shares. Broker non-votes with respect to a matter will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter and thus will have no effect on the vote for that matter. 

Can I change my voting instructions before the meeting?

Proxies given by stockholders of record for use at the Annual Meeting may be revoked at any time prior to the exercise of the powers conferred.  In addition to revocation in any other manner permitted by law, stockholders of record giving a proxy may revoke the proxy by an instrument in writing, executed by the stockholder or his or her attorney authorized in writing or, if the stockholder is a corporation, by an officer or attorney thereof duly authorized, and deposited either at the corporate headquarters of the Company at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Annual Meeting, or any adjournments thereof, at which the proxy is to be used, or with the chairman of such Annual Meeting on the day of the Annual Meeting or adjournments thereof, and upon either of such deposits the proxy is revoked. If your shares are held in the name of a bank or brokerage firm, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the bank or broker, to be able to vote at the meeting.

Method of Counting Votes

Unless a contrary choice is indicated, all duly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions set forth on the proxy card.  A broker non-vote occurs when a broker holding shares registered in street name is permitted to vote, in the broker’s discretion, on routine matters without receiving instructions from the client, but is not permitted to vote without instructions on non-routine matters, and the broker returns a proxy card with no vote (the “non-vote”) on the non-routine matter.  Under the rules and regulations of the primary trading markets applicable to most brokers, the election of directors is a non-routine matter which requires the broker’s client to provide the broker with voting instructions and the ratification of the appointment of auditors is a routine matter on which a broker has the discretion to vote if instructions are not received from the client in a timely manner.  Abstentions will be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum but will not be counted for or against the election of directors or the ratification of independent auditors.  As to Item 1, the Proxy confers authority to vote for all of the seven persons listed as candidates for a position on the Board of Directors even though the block in Item 1 is not marked unless the names of one or more candidates are lined out. The Proxy will be voted FOR Items 2 and 3 unless AGAINST or ABSTAIN is indicated.  If any other business is presented at the meeting, the Proxy shall be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.

4

Who will count the vote?

StockTrans will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of election at the Annual Meeting.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

We intend to publish the final results in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days after the end of the Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?

It means that you hold shares registered in more than one account. You must return all proxies to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

How many copies of this Proxy Statement will I receive if I share my mailing address with another security holder?

Unless we have been instructed otherwise, we are delivering only one Proxy Statement to multiple security holders sharing the same address. This is commonly referred to as “householding.” We will however, deliver promptly a separate copy of this Proxy Statement to a security holder at a shared address to which a single copy of this Proxy Statement was delivered, on written or oral request. Requests for copies of the Proxy Statement or requests to cease householding in the future should be directed to Andrew Ashton, Secretary, Lightwave Logic, Inc., 121 Continental Drive, Suite 110, Newark, Delaware 19713. Telephone 302-356-2717. If you share an address with another stockholder and wish to receive a single copy of this Proxy Statement, instead of multiple copies, you may direct this request to us at the address or telephone number listed above. Stockholders who hold shares in “street name” may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization to request information about householding.

How can I obtain additional proxy materials or other Company materials?

Copies of the Company’s SEC filings are available under the “Investor Info” page of the Company’s website at www.lightwavelogic.com. Any stockholder desiring additional proxy materials, a copy of any other document incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement, or a copy of the Company’s bylaws should contact the Company’s Secretary. Requests should be directed to Andrew Ashton, Secretary, Lightwave Logic, Inc., 121 Continental Drive, Suite 110, Newark, Delaware 19713. Telephone 302-356-2717.

Who pays for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

The Company pays for the cost of soliciting proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors. The Company also will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy material to beneficial owners. Proxies may be solicited by mail, telephone, other electronic means or in person. Proxies may be solicited by directors, officers and regular, full-time employees of the Company, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for their services.

5

Who are the largest principal shareholders?

See “ Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners ” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement for a table setting forth each owner of greater than 5% of the Company’s common stock as of the Record Date.

What percentages of stock do the directors and officers own?

Together, they own approximately 21.21% of our Company common stock as of the Record Date. For information regarding the ownership of our common stock by management, see the section entitled “ Security Ownership of Management ” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Do I have dissenters’ rights of appraisal?

Under Nevada Revised Statutes, our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to any of the items proposed to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

Where can I find general information about the Company?

General information about us can be found on our website at www.lightwavelogic.com. The information on our website is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for investment purposes. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“ SEC ”). We make available free of charge, either by direct access on our website or a link to the SEC’s website, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available directly at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

ALL PROXIES RECEIVED WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHOICES SPECIFIED ON SUCH PROXIES.  PROXIES WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEEE AND FOR A PROPOSAL IF NO CONTRARY SPECIFICATION IS MADE.  ALL VALID PROXIES OBTAINED WILL BE VOTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE PROXY WITH RESPECT TO ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT MAY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING.

6

INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE

OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

        Our bylaws provide that the number of directors under our bylaws is determined by resolution of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently consists of seven directors. Each director is elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until the election and qualification of his or her successor or his or her earlier resignation or removal.

        The names of our directors, including the seven nominees to be elected at the Annual Meeting, and certain information about each of them are set forth below.

Identity of directors

Business experience of directors

Mr. James S. Marcelli . Mr. Marcelli has served as an officer and director of our Company since August 2008. Mr. Marcelli is in charge of the day-to-day operations of our Company and its movement to a fully functioning commercial corporation. Since 2000, Mr. Marcelli has served as the president and chief executive officer of Marcelli Associates, a consulting company that offers senior management consulting, mentoring, and business development services to start-up and growth companies. Business segments Mr. Marcelli has worked with included an Internet networking gaming center, high speed custom gaming computers, high tech manufacturing businesses and business service companies.

Mr. Frederick J. Goetz, Jr . Mr. Goetz has served as an officer and director of our Company since July 2004. He is a leader in the corporate coding and operation of electrostatic simulation software for nonlinear optic materials development and aids in the development of novel molecular designs and quantum mechanical interpretation at our Company. Prior to joining

7

our Company, Mr. Goetz began his career at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and the Army Research Laboratory on Aberdeen Proving Grounds after graduating first in his class in physics from the University of Delaware in 1997.

Mr. Andrew J. Ashton .  Mr. Ashton has served as an officer and director of our Company since July 2004. Since that time his assistance in the creation of the synthetic chemistry of our novel molecular architecture has been fundamental to our Company’s success.  His current duties include the development of chemical synthesis, providing extensive analytical support and assisting with our Company’s management goals. Mr. Ashton is a skilled computer scientist and organic chemist who began his career in 1998 at the Army Research Laboratory on the Aberdeen Proving Grounds where he helped to design and implement computer interfaces for fiberglass composite analysis.  At that time he joined PSI-TEC Corporation as a financial manager and was responsible for day to day administrative duties.  He was instrumental in securing government funding, PSI-TEC’s sole financial source, until 2003.

Dr. Philips W. Smith . Dr. Smith has served as Non-Executive Chair of the Board of Directors of our Company since January 2010. Dr. Smith is the father of Thomas P. Smith, who in January 2010, resigned as board member. In 2001, Dr. Smith brought TASER International, Inc. public through an IPO and most recently served as Chairman of TASER International, Inc. (NasdaqGS: TASR) until his retirement from that position in December 2004. Dr. Smith subsequently resigned his TASER board seat in October 2006.  Since then, Dr. Smith has been actively involved as an investor in start-up companies. Dr. Smith’s educational experience includes a B.S. from West Point, an M.B.A. from Michigan State University and a PhD from St. Louis University.

Dr. Ross Fasick . Dr. Ross Fasick has served as a director of our Company since July 2008. Dr. Fasick has a broad spectrum of global business and chemistry experience that spans over thirty years. Dr. Fasick spent the early years of his career with DuPont as a research chemist primarily working with polymers and dyes. During his thirty year tenure at Dupont, Dr. Fasick held diverse positions ranging from manufacturing and business development to making divestitures and acquisitions. He served as both President of DuPont’s Brazil division and Director of worldwide paint operations. He completed his DuPont career as Senior VP of Polymers and Automotive, a division that generates multi-billion dollar annual revenues.  Since his retirement, Dr. Fasick has remained an active board and committee member for private college and pre-college level institutions. Dr Fasick earned his Ph.D in organic chemistry at the University of Delaware.  

Mr. William C. Pickett, III . Mr. Picket has served as a director of our Company since January 2008. Mr. Pickett enjoyed a 32 year career with E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., where he worked in numerous financial leadership positions, including serving from February 2002 to April 2004 as Chief Financial Officer of Invista, DuPont’s $7 billion man-made fibers company, which was ultimately sold to Koch Industries, Inc. Since February 2005 Mr. Pickett has been serving as a member of the Board of Directors, Executive Committee, Treasurer and Chair of the Finance Committee of the Ronald McDonald House of Delaware; and since December 2004, Mr. Picket has been serving as Chair of Audit Committee and Chief Compliance Officer of the Operation Warm charity. Mr. Pickett received his MBA from Harvard Business School and a BA from Trinity College.

8

Thomas E. Zelibor, Rear Admiral, USN (Ret) . RADM Zelibor has served as a director of our Company since July 2008. RADM Zelibor has over twenty years of strategic planning and senior leadership experience. Currently, RADM Zelibor serves as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Flatirons Solutions Corp. a professional services firm that provides consulting, systems integration, systems & software engineering, and program management expertise to corporate and government clients. Previously, from July 2006 RADM Zelibor, served as the Dean of the College of Operational and Strategic Leadership at the United States Naval War College where he was responsible for the adoption of a corporate approach to leadership development. Prior to that time,, RADM Zelibor served in a number of positions, including as Director of Global Operations, United States Strategic Command; Director, Space, Information Warfare, Command and Control on the Navy staff; Department of the Navy, Deputy Chief Information Officer (CIO), Navy; Commander, Carrier Group Three and Commander, Naval Space Command.

Each Director of the Company holds such position until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified.  The officers hold office until the first meeting of the Board of Directors following the annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are chosen and qualified, subject to early removal by the Board of Directors.

Transactions with Related Persons

On January 8, 2009, Thomas P. Smith resigned as a member of our Board of Directors, and on January 8, 2009, our Board of Directors invited Dr. Philips W. Smith to be appointed as a member of our Company’s Board of Directors and as our full-time Non-executive Chair of the Board of Directors, and on January 13, 2010, Dr. Smith accepted the invitation to be appointed to those positions with our Company. Dr. Philips W. Smith is the father of then board member Thomas P. Smith. In exchange for serving as a member of our Board of Directors and as Non-Executive Chair of the Board of Directors, Dr. Smith received as compensation a warrant to purchase up to 650,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.51 per share for a period of up to five years.

Corporate Governance

Code of Ethics

We have not yet adopted a code of ethics for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions or any other position due to our development stage, the small number of executive officers involved with our Company, and the fact that we operate with few employees. Our Board of Directors will continue to evaluate, from time to time, whether a code of ethics should be developed and adopted.

Audit Committee

We do not have a separately designated standing audit committee in place. Our full Board of Directors currently serves in that capacity. This is due to our development stage, lack of

9

business operations, the small number of executive officers involved with our Company, and the fact that we operate with few employees. Our Board of Directors will continue to evaluate, from time to time, whether a separately designated standing audit committee should be put in place. We do not have an audit committee charter.

Our Board of Directors is comprised of James S. Marcelli, Frederick J. Goetz, Jr., Andrew J. Ashton, Ross Fasick, William C. Pickett, III, Philips W. Smith, and Thomas E. Zelibor. Mr. Pickett serves as our audit committee financial expert as that term is defined by the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our audit committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and has discussed with its independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380),1 as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.   The audit committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from its independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with its independent accountant its independent accountant’s independence. Based on the review and discussions described above, the audit committee recommended that the audited financial statements be included in the our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Compensation Committee

Our Board of Directors does not have a standing compensation committee or committee performing similar functions. This is due to our development stage, lack of business operations, the small number of executive officers involved with our Company, and the fact that we operate with few employees. Our full Board of Directors currently participates in the consideration of executive officer and director compensation. We do not have an audit compensation charter. Our Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing, recommending and approving our compensation policies and benefits, including the compensation of all of our executive officers and directors. Our Board of Directors also has the principal responsibility for the administration of our employee stock plan. Our Board of Directors will continue to evaluate, from time to time, whether it should appoint a standing compensation committee.

Executive officers who are also directors participate in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation, but the ultimate determination of executive compensation is determined by the independent directors. Neither the board nor management utilizes compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation .

Nominating Committee

Our Board of Directors does not have a nominating committee. This is due to our development stage and lack of business operations. Instead of having such a committee, our Board of Directors historically has searched for and evaluated qualified individuals to become nominees for membership on our Board of Directors. The directors recommend candidates for nomination for election or reelection for each annual meeting of stockholders and, as necessary, to fill vacancies and newly created directorships.  

10

All of our director nominees have expressed their willingness to continue to serve as our directors. When new candidates for our Board of Directors are sought, all of our directors evaluate each candidate for nomination as director within the context of the needs and the composition of the board as a whole. The Board of Directors conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of candidates. When evaluating director nominees, our Board of Directors generally seeks to identify individuals with diverse, yet complementary backgrounds. Our directors consider both the personal characteristics and experience of director nominees, including each nominee’s independence, diversity, age, skills, expertise, time availability and industry background in the context of the needs of the Board of Directors and the Company. The Board of Directors believes that director nominees should exhibit proven leadership capabilities and experience at a high level of responsibility within their chosen fields, and have the experience and ability to analyze business and/or scientific issues facing our Company. In addition to business expertise, the Board of Directors requires that director nominees have the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values and, above all, are committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders and other stakeholders. To date, all new candidates have been identified by members of our Board of Directors, and we have not paid any fee to a third party to assist in the process of identifying or evaluating director candidates.

Our directors will consider candidates for nomination as director who are recommended by a stockholder and will not evaluate any candidate for nomination for director differently because the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. To date, we have not received or rejected any suggestions for a director candidate recommended by any stockholder or group of stockholders owning more than 5% of our common stock.

When submitting candidates for nomination to be elected at our annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders should follow the following notice procedures and comply with applicable provisions of our bylaws. To consider a candidate recommended by a stockholder for nomination at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the recommendation must be delivered or mailed to and received by our Secretary within the time periods discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Stockholder Proposals for 2011 Annual Meeting.” The recommendation must include the information specified in our bylaws for stockholder nominees to be considered at an annual meeting, along with the following:

·

The stockholder ’ s name and address and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is proposed;

·

The stockholder ’ s reason for making the nomination at the annual meeting, and the signed consent of the nominee to serve if elected;

·

The number of shares owned by, and any material interest of, the record owner and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the record owner is proposing the nominee;

·

A description of any arrangements or understandings between the stockholder, the nominee and any other person regarding the nomination; and

·

Information regarding the nominee that would be required to be included in our Proxy Statement by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the nominee ’ s age, business experience for the past five years and any other directorships held by the nominee.

11

The information listed above is not a complete list of requisite information. The secretary will forward any timely recommendations containing the required information to our independent directors for consideration.

Director Independence

Although we are currently listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, our Board has reviewed each of the directors’ relationships with the Company in conjunction with Section 121 of the listing standards of the NYSE Amex and has affirmatively determined that four of our directors, Ross Fasick, William C. Pickett, III, Philips W. Smith and Thomas E. Zelibor, are independent directors in that they are independent of management and free of any relationship that would interfere with their independent judgment as members of our Board of Directors. Additionally, prior to his resignation, Thomas P. Smith was determined to be such an independent director.

Board Leadership Structure

        Our bylaws provide the Board of Directors with flexibility to combine or separate the positions of chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer in accordance with its determination that utilizing one or the other structure is in the best interests of our company. Our current structure is that of separate Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors.  James Marcelli serves as our Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for the day-to-day leadership of the Company.  Philips W. Smith serves as our full-time Non-executive Chair of the Board of Directors .  Dr. Smith is considered an independent director. From time to time, each of the other independent directors works with Dr. Smith to perform a variety of functions related to our corporate governance, including coordinating board activities, setting relevant items on the agenda (in consultation with our chief executive officer, as necessary or appropriate) and ensuring adequate communication between the Board of Directors and management. In addition, our Board of Directors has determined that maintaining the independence of a majority of our directors helps maintain its independent oversight of management.

Risk Oversight

        The Board of Directors is actively involved in the oversight of risks, including strategic, operational and other risks, which could affect our business. The Board of Directors does not have a standing risk management committee, but administers this oversight function directly through the Board of Directors as a whole, which oversee risks relevant to their respective functions. The Board of Directors considers strategic risks and opportunities and administers its respective risk oversight function by evaluating management’s monitoring, assessment and management of risks, including steps taken to limit our exposure to known risks, through regular interaction with our senior management and in board and committee deliberations that are closed to members of management. The interaction with management occurs not only at formal board and committee meetings but also through periodic and other written and oral communications.

12

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders who desire to communicate with the board, or a specific director, may do so by sending the communication addressed to either the Board of Directors or any director, c/o Lightwave Logic, Inc., 121 Continental Drive, Suite 110, Newark, Delaware 19713. These communications will be delivered to the board, or any individual director, as specified.

Meetings of the Board and Committees

During 2009, there were 12 meetings of the Board of Directors. Each current director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the board held in 2009. The Board of Directors also acted at times by unanimous written consent, as authorized by our bylaws and the Nevada Revised Statutes.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

To the best of our knowledge, no officer, director and/or beneficial owner of more than 10% of our Common Stock, failed to file reports as required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the period covered by this report.

Executive Officers

Identity of executive officers and significant employees

(1)

Optical Computing Guru is not an executive officer position, but our Company anticipates that Mr. Turpin’s expertise in optical computing and his respect in the optical computing community will significantly contribute to the development of our Company.

13

Business experience of executive officers and significant employees

The business experience of Messrs. Marcelli, Goetz and Ashton is described above under the caption “Business experience of directors.”

Dr. David F. Eaton .  Mr. Eaton has served as an officer of our Company since May 2007. For over 30 years, Mr. Eaton was employed in DuPont’s chemical division, with his most recent appointment being its technology director. Most recently, from September 2003 to present, Mr. Eaton founded and is the principal of Light Insights, LLC, a consulting firm, and from March 2005 to present, Mr. Eaton has served as vice president of technology for software company Precision Cure, LLC.  Mr. Eaton has a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Wesleyan University and a Ph.D. in chemistry from the California Institute of Technology.

Mr. Terry Turpin . Mr. Turpin has served as our Optical Computing Guru since March 2008. Since October 2006, Mr. Turpin has been a member of the UMBC College of Natural Science and Mathematics Advisory Board. Until January 2007, when Essex Corporation was acquired by Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp., Mr. Turpin was a director of Essex Corporation. Mr. Turpin remained Senior Vice President and Chief Scientist for Essex Corporation after its acquisition until April 2007. Mr. Turpin was appointed as a director of Essex Corporation in January 1997 and became its Senior Vice President and Chief Scientist in 1996. He joined Essex Corporation through a merger with SEDC where he was Vice President and Chief Scientist from September 1984 through June 1989. From December 1983 to September 1984 he was an independent consultant. From 1963 through December 1983, Mr. Turpin was employed by the National Securities Agency (NSA). He was Chief of the Advanced Processing Technologies Division for ten years. He holds patents for optical computers and adaptive optical components. Mr. Turpin represented NSA on the Tri-Service Optical Processing Committee organized by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Akron in 1966 and a Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Catholic University in Washington, D.C. in 1970.

14