SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

(212) 355-1600
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

 

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year; if changed since last report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  o      No  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o      Accelerated filer  o      Non-accelerated filer  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  o      No  þ

 

At December 5, 2007, 6,111,118 shares of the Class A Common Stock ($.01 par value per share) of the Registrant were outstanding. At December 5, 2007, 57,937,910 shares of the Class B Common Stock ($0.000001 par value per share) of the Registrant were outstanding.

 

PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

On October 30, 2007, Pzena Investment Management, Inc. consummated an initial public offering of 6,100,000 shares of its Class A common stock in which it received net proceeds of approximately $99.1 million that it used to purchase 6,100,000 membership units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, representing 9.5% of the then outstanding membership units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC. Concurrently with the consummation of this initial public offering, (i) the operating agreement of Pzena Investment Management, LLC was amended and restated such that, among other things, Pzena Investment Management, Inc. became the sole managing member of Pzena Investment Management, LLC and (ii) related reorganization transactions were consummated. Accordingly, as of and subsequent to October 30, 2007, (i) Pzena Investment Management, Inc. will consolidate the financial results of Pzena Investment Management, LLC with its own and reflect the remaining 90.5% membership interest in Pzena Investment Management, LLC as a non-controlling interest in its consolidated financial statements, and (ii) Pzena Investment Management, Inc.’s income will be generated by its 9.5% economic interest in Pzena Investment Management, LLC’s net income. Therefore, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q presents the following financial statements:

 

(1) the consolidated financial statements of Pzena Investment Management, LLC as of December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007; and

 

(2) the financial statements of Pzena Investment Management, Inc. as of May 10, 2007 (capitalization) and September 30, 2007 and for the period May 10, 2007 (capitalization) through September 30, 2007.

 

“We,” “us,” “our,” and the “company” refer to: (i) Pzena Investment Management, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Pzena Investment Management, LLC and all of its subsidiaries, following the consummation of the above-referenced initial public offering, amendment and restatement of the operating agreement of Pzena Investment Management, LLC and related reorganization transactions on October 30, 2007, and (ii) to Pzena Investment Management, LLC and all of its subsidiaries prior to the consummation of these transactions. “Our operating company” refers to Pzena Investment Management, LLC.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations, or forecasts, of future events. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. Words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “ongoing,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project” or similar words or phrases, or the negatives of those words or phrases, may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on potentially inaccurate assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the factors described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should, however, review the factors and risks we describe in the reports we will file from time to time with the SEC after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

 

 

Our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-143660) and the subsequent reports that we file with the SEC, accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, identify additional factors that can affect forward-looking statements.

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

controlling interests recorded on the consolidated financial statements of the Company includes the non-controlling interests of the outside investors in each of these entities.

 

The Company acts as the investment manager for four trusts and one offshore investment company, each of which are considered variable-interest entities. Each of these entities are vehicles through which the Company offers its Global Value and/or International Value strategies and each commenced operations in 2006. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of any of these entities. Correspondingly, their results of operations and financial condition are not consolidated by the Company. The total net assets of these variable-interest entities were approximately $1,031.0 million at September 30, 2007. The Company is not exposed to losses as a result of its involvement with these entities because it has no direct investment in them.

 

Investments in private investment partnerships in which the Company has a minority interest and exercises significant influence are accounted for using the equity method. Such investments are reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition as investments in affiliates and are recorded at the amount of capital reported by the respective private investment partnerships. Such capital accounts reflect the contributions paid to, distributions received from, and the equity earnings of, the private investment partnerships. The earnings of these private investment partnerships are included in equity in earnings of affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Prior to March 31, 2007, the Company’s membership units were categorized as either Compensatory or Capital. Because both types of units had features of both debt and equity, the Company accounted for them pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (FAS 123(R)), and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments With Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (FAS 150), as described further below.

 

Compensatory Units consisted of a series of annual Profits Only Interest and Class C Profits Interest awards made between 2002 and 2006 that were granted to employees and members for services rendered. Through March 31, 2007, the distributions associated with these units, and the subsequent incremental increase or decrease in their redemption value, were accounted for as part of compensation expense on the consolidated statement of operations, as further discussed below. The cumulative liability for redeeming these units at December 31, 2006 is shown in the consolidated statement of financial condition as compensatory units subject to mandatory redemption.

 

Capital Units included units issued to founders and those purchased by certain employees. Through March 31, 2007, the distributions associated with these units, and the subsequent incremental increase or decrease in their redemption value, were accounted for as part of interest in mandatorily redeemable units on the consolidated statements of operations. The cumulative liability for redeeming these units at December 31, 2006 is shown in the consolidated statements of financial condition as capital units subject to mandatory redemption.

 

Effective March 31, 2007, the Company amended its Operating Agreement to remove all mandatory redemption provisions. As all of its membership units thereafter had only equity characteristics, neither distributions nor subsequent incremental changes to their value were charged against income from the effective date of the amendment.

 

Management’s Use of Estimates:

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fair Values of Financial Instruments:

 

The carrying amount of all financial instruments in the consolidated statements of financial condition, including marketable securities, approximate their fair values.

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

Revenue Recognition:

 

Revenue, comprised of advisory fee income, is recognized over the period in which investment management services are provided. Advisory fee income includes management fees that are calculated based on percentages of assets under management, generally billed quarterly, either in arrears or advance, depending on their contractual terms. Advisory fee income also includes incentive fees that may be earned by the Company depending on the investment return of the assets under management. Incentive fee arrangements generally entitle the Company to participate, on a fixed-percentage basis, in any returns generated in excess of an agreed-upon benchmark. The Company’s participation percentage in such return differentials is then multiplied by assets under management to determine incentive fees. Returns are calculated on an annualized basis over the contract’s measurement period, which may extend up to three years. Incentive fees are generally payable annually. Pursuant to the preferred accounting method under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue D-96, Accounting for Management Fees Based on a Formula (EITF D-96), such incentive fee income is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved.

 

Unit-based Compensation:

 

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its unit-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB 25, and related interpretations. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted FAS 123(R), using the modified prospective method, which requires the recognition of the cost of equity-based compensation based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The adoption of FAS 123(R) did not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

 

Until March 31, 2007, compensation expense included the distributions made on Compensatory Units outstanding, as well as the incremental increases or decreases in the redemption values of these units subsequent to their grant date over their vesting period. Distributions are generally paid on the Company’s income before non-cash compensation charges. Prior to December 31, 2006, Compensatory Unit redemption values were determined using a formula-based price, based on the member’s pro rata share of net fee revenue (as defined in the Operating Agreement) for the four completed fiscal quarters immediately preceding redemption. This portion of the redemption amount was exclusive of any associated accumulated undistributed earnings, which was also required to be paid to members upon redemption. Effective December 31, 2006, these units’ redemption features were changed from a formula-based plan to a fair-value based plan. As such, the Company recorded a one-time increase in compensation expense related to that modification.

 

The Operating Agreement was amended as of March 31, 2007 to eliminate the Company’s obligation to redeem units under any circumstance. Since all Compensatory Units thereafter had only equity characteristics, neither distributions, nor subsequent incremental changes to these units’ value, were charged against income subsequent to March 31, 2007. In addition, as of March 31, 2007 the Company accelerated the vesting of all Compensatory Units then subject to vesting. The Company recorded a one-time charge which was associated with this acceleration as of March 31, 2007.

 

Interest on Mandatorily Redeemable Units:

 

Until March 31, 2007, interest on mandatorily redeemable units included distributions made on Capital Units outstanding, as well as the incremental increases or decreases in the redemption values of these units. Distributions are generally paid on the Company’s income before non-cash compensation charges. Prior to January 1, 2005, Capital Units were redeemable at book value. Accordingly, incremental increases or decreases to book value in those periods were included as a component of interest on mandatorily redeemable units.

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

Effective January 1, 2005, the Operating Agreement was amended to require that Capital Units be redeemed on the death of a member at a formula-based price based on the member’s pro rata share of net fee revenue (as defined in the Operating Agreement) for the four completed fiscal quarters immediately preceding the member’s death. This portion of the redemption amount was exclusive of any accumulated undistributed earnings associated with such units, which were also required to be paid to the member’s estate. Accordingly, as of this date, any subsequent incremental increases or decreases to this formula-based price, as well as any change in undistributed earnings, were included as a component of interest on mandatorily redeemable units.

 

Effective December 31, 2006, these units’ redemption features were changed from a formula-based plan to a fair-value based plan. As such, the Company recorded a one-time increase in interest on mandatorily redeemable units related to that modification.

 

Effective March 31, 2007, the Operating Agreement was amended to eliminate the Company’s obligation to redeem units under any circumstance. Since all Capital Units thereafter had only equity characteristics, neither distributions, nor subsequent incremental changes to these unit’s value, were charged against income subsequent to the effective date of the amendment.

 

Compensatory Units Subject to Mandatory Redemption:

 

Until the amendment of its Operating Agreement on March 31, 2007, the Company recorded a net liability for its Compensatory Units equal to the accumulated redemption value as of the balance sheet date of all such outstanding units. This liability also included any undistributed earnings attributable to such units.

 

Prior to December 31, 2006, vested Compensatory Units were required to be redeemed on the death of a member at a formula-based price based on the member’s pro rata share of net fee revenue (as defined in the Operating Agreement) for the four completed fiscal quarters immediately preceding the member’s death. Effective December 31, 2006, these units’ redemption provisions were changed from a formula-based plan to a fair-value based plan. As such, the Company recorded a one-time increase in the liability related to that modification.

 

Effective March 31, 2007, the Company amended its Operating Agreement to remove all mandatory redemption provisions. As of that date, the liability associated with these units was reclassified as equity. Further, as of March 31, 2007, the Company accelerated the vesting of all compensatory units then subject to vesting.

 

Capital Units Subject to Mandatory Redemption:

 

Until the amendment of its Operating Agreement on March 31, 2007, the Company recorded a net liability for its Capital Units equal to the accumulated redemption value as of the balance sheet date of all such outstanding units. This liability also included any undistributed earnings attributable to such units.

 

Prior to January 1, 2005, Capital Units were redeemable at book value. Effective January 1, 2005, the terms of the Company’s Operating Agreement were amended to require that Capital Units be redeemed on the death of a member at a formula-based price determined based on the member’s pro rata share of net fee revenue (as defined in the Operating Agreement) for the four completed fiscal quarters immediately preceding the member’s death. Effective December 31, 2006, these units’ redemption provisions were changed from a formula-based plan to a fair-value based plan. As such, the Company recorded a one-time increase in the liability related to that modification.

 

Effective March 31, 2007, the Company amended its Operating Agreement to remove all mandatory redemption provisions. As of that date, the liability associated with these units was reclassified as equity.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash:

 

The Company considers all highly-liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

Interest on cash and cash equivalents is recorded as interest income on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

The Company was required to maintain compensating balances of $2.0 million and $2.1 million at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, respectively, as collateral for letters of credit issued by a third party in lieu of a cash security deposit, as required by the Company’s lease for its New York office space. Such amounts are included in restricted cash on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

 

Due From Broker:

 

Due from broker consists primarily of cash balances and amounts receivable for unsettled securities transactions held at the clearing brokers of the Company’s consolidated investment partnerships.

 

Due To Broker:

 

Due to broker consists primarily of amounts payable for unsettled securities transactions initiated by the clearing brokers of the Company’s consolidated investment partnerships.

 

Investments in Securities:

 

Investments in marketable securities and securities sold short represent primarily the securities held by the Company’s consolidated investment partnerships. All such securities are classified as trading securities and are recorded at fair value, with net realized and unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Securities Valuation:

 

Investments in marketable equity securities and securities sold short which are traded on a national securities exchange (or reported on the NASDAQ national market) are carried at fair value based on the last reported sales price on the valuation date. If no reported sales occurred on the valuation date, investments in securities are valued at the bid price and securities sold short are valued at the ask price. Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date.

 

The net realized gain or loss on sales of securities is determined on a specific identification basis and is included in realized and unrealized gain (loss), net on marketable securities and securities sold short in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk:

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and advisory fees receivable. The Company maintains its cash, temporary cash and restricted cash investments in bank deposit and other accounts whose balances, at times, exceed Federally insured limits.

 

The concentration of credit risk with respect to advisory fees receivable is generally limited, due to the short payment terms extended to clients by the Company. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its advisory fees receivable and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts, if necessary, based on a history of past write-offs and collections and current credit conditions. For the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, approximately 20.7% and 19.3%, respectively, of the Company’s advisory fees were generated from an advisory agreement with one client. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, fees generated from this agreement comprised 19.8% and 21.6%, respectively, of the Company’s total advisory fees. At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, no allowance for doubtful accounts has been deemed necessary.

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

Property and Equipment:

 

Property and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the remaining lease term.

 

Business Segments:

 

The Company views its operations as comprising one operating segment.

 

Income Taxes:

 

The Company is a limited liability company that has elected to be treated as a partnership for tax purposes. The Company has not made provision for federal or state income taxes because it is the personal responsibility of each of the Company’s members to separately report their proportionate share of the Company’s taxable income or loss. Similarly, the income of the Company’s consolidated investment partnerships is not subject to income taxes, as it is allocated to each partnership’s individual partners. The Company has made provision for New York City Unincorporated Business Tax. The Company is a cash basis taxpayer.

 

The Company accounts for the New York City Unincorporated Business Tax pursuant to the asset and liability method, which requires deferred income tax assets and liabilities to be recorded for temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The income tax provision, or credit, is the tax payable or refundable for the period, plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

 

Foreign Currency:

 

Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts on the respective dates of such transactions.

 

The Company does not isolate that portion of the results of its operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included in the net realized and unrealized gain/(loss), net on marketable securities and securities sold short.

 

Reported net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Company’s books and the U.S. Dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the fair values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities at fiscal period end, resulting from changes in exchange rates.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements:

 

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribed the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet in connection with accounting for uncertainties in income tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, by an entity before being measured and recognized in the financial

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

statements. The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The impact of the adoption of this standard was not material.

 

In September 2006, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements. The application of FAS 157 is required for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Management is in the process of assessing the impact of this standard on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

 

In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position No. 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies (“SOP 07-1”). SOP 07-1 clarifies the definition of an investment company and whether the specialized accounting model of an investment company may be retained by a parent company in consolidation or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting. SOP 07-1 will be effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SOP 07-1 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to elect to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense, included in general and administrative expenses, totaled $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Such expenses totaled $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

 

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company earned $2.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively, in investment advisory fees from unconsolidated entities in which it has an ownership interest and for which it acts as the investment manager. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, such advisory fees totaled $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, the Company had advanced $0.1 million to an international investment company for organization and start-up costs, which are included in receivable from related parties on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company is the sponsor and investment manager of this entity.

 

At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, receivable from related parties included $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of loans to employees. Certain of these loans are in the form of forgivable promissory notes which are amortized through compensation expense pursuant to their terms.

 

Employees of the Company who are considered accredited investors have the ability to open separately-managed accounts, or invest in certain of the Company’s consolidated investment partnerships, without being assessed advisory fees. Investments by employees in separately-managed accounts are permitted only at the discretion of the Executive Committee, but are generally not subject to the same minimum investment levels that are required of outside investors. Some of the investment advisory fees that are waived on separately managed accounts for employees are for strategies that typically have account minimums, which vary by strategy, but typically average approximately $50,000 per account per year. The impact of this benefit is not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for any period presented.

 

 

 

 

 

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that include indemnities in favor of third parties, such as engagement letters with advisors and consultants. In certain cases, the Company may have recourse against third parties with respect to these indemnities. The Company maintains insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims under these indemnities. FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45), providing accounting and disclosure requirements for certain guarantees. The Company has had no claims or payments pursuant to these agreements, and it believes the likelihood of a claim being made is remote. Utilizing the methodology in FIN 45, the Company’s estimate of the value of such guarantees is de minimis, and, therefore, an accrual has not been made in the consolidated financial statements.

 

In the normal course of business, the Company may also be subject to various legal proceedings from time to time. Currently, there are no such proceedings pending against the Company.

 

The Company leases office space under a non-cancelable operating lease agreement which expires on October 31, 2015. The Company reflects lease expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis. In early 2007, the Company agreed to lease additional office space at the Company’s headquarters at 120 West 45th Street, New York, New York. The Company took possession of this space on March 1, 2007. The new lease is co-terminus with the Company’s existing lease.

 

Lease expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 were $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Such expenses totaled $0.9 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

 

 

The Company maintains a defined contribution pension plan which covers substantially all members and employees. The Company may make contributions to the plan at the discretion of management. Under the terms of the plan, all such contributions vest immediately. Company contributions for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 were $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Such contributions totaled $0.8 million and $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

 

 

As discussed further in Note 12, the Company issued Compensatory Units to employees and members which had redemption features that required them to be classified as liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Prior to March 31, 2007, distributions on the Compensatory Units outstanding, and changes in these units’ redemption values, were recorded as compensation expense. Effective December 31, 2006, the terms of these units’ redemption features were changed from a formula-based plan to a fair-value based plan.

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

As of March 31, 2007, the effective date of the amendment to the Operating Agreement to eliminate the Company’s obligation to redeem units under any circumstance, the unit-based compensation awards previously categorized as liabilities were reclassified as equity. Further, as of March 31, 2007, the Company accelerated the vesting of all Compensatory Units then subject to vesting. Subsequent to this date, distributions on these units are not considered a component of compensation expense and are instead recorded as a direct reduction of members’ capital.

 

Compensation and benefits expense to employees and members is comprised of the following:

 

 

 

 

On July 23, 2007, the Company entered into a $60.0 million, three-year term loan agreement, the proceeds of which were used to finance a one-time distribution to current members. The principal amount borrowed bears interest at a variable rate based, at the Company’s option, on (1) the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve-month LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.00%, or (2) the higher of the lender’s prime rate and the Federal Funds Rate. The principal amount is payable in full at the end of the three-year term, with no penalty for prepayment. For the year ended July 23, 2008, the interest rate in effect will be 6.41%, which is equal to the twelve-month LIBOR rate in effect at the time of the closing of the agreement of 5.41% plus 1.00%. Approximately $0.1 million in debt issuance costs were incurred associated with this loan. Such costs have been recorded in prepaid expenses and other assets and will be amortized over the term of the loan as a component of other income on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Also on July 23, 2007, the Company obtained a $20.0 million revolving credit facility, which will expire on July 23, 2010, in order to finance its short term working capital needs. This facility carries a commitment fee of 0.2% on any unused amounts. As of and for the period ended September 30, 2007, no balance was outstanding against the facility.

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities of $1.0 million and $0.9 million are included in other liabilities at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, respectively. Deferred tax liabilities are primarily the result of the Company’s use of the cash basis of accounting for income taxes.

 

The income tax provision differs from the expense that would result from applying the New York City Unincorporated Business Tax rate to income before income taxes. The primary difference results from members’ compensation, which is not deductible for tax purposes.

 

 

 

Marketable securities consisted of the following at September 30, 2007:

 

 

 

 

 

Prior to December 31, 2006, ownership interests in the Company were comprised of Capital Units (Class A Voting Units and Class B Non-Voting Units), and various series of Profits-Only Interests and Class C Profits Interests. With the exception of the Class B Non-Voting Units, all units were entitled to vote. All of the Profits-Only Interests and Class C Profits Interests were granted to employees and members as unit-based compensation. Profits-Only Interests vested ratably over a three-year period, while the Class C Profits Interests cliff vested at the conclusion of their three-year term. Profits and losses were allocated on a pro rata basis according to the terms of the Operating Agreement. Effective January 1, 2005, the Operating Agreement was amended to require that all Capital Units be repurchased in the event of the holder’s death or, if applicable, termination of employment, at a formula-based price, determined by the holder’s pro rata share of net fee revenue (as defined in the Operating Agreement) for the four completed fiscal quarters immediately preceding the holder’s death or, if applicable, the holder’s termination of employment. Profits-Only Interests and Class C Profits Interests had similar repurchase provisions effective from their respective dates of grant. These redemption amounts were exclusive of any accumulated undistributed earnings associated with such units, which were also required to be paid to the holder’s estate. Prior to this amendment, all Capital Units were required to be repurchased at their book value at the time of the unitholder’s death. These redemption features caused all of the Company’s units to be classified as liabilities as of the effective date of FAS 150 with respect to the Company, which was July 1, 2003.

 

Prior to March 31, 2007, distributions made with respect to Compensatory Units were classified as compensation expense. Incremental changes to these units’ redemption values subsequent to the grant date were also included as a component of compensation expense at each reporting period. For the Company’s non-compensatory units (Capital Units), distributions and incremental changes in the net liability associated with these units’ redemption values have been recorded as components of interest on mandatorily redeemable units in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods prior to March 31, 2007.

 

Upon a sale of the Company, proceeds were to be allocated first to the holders of Capital Units, and then to the holders of Profits-Only Interests and Class C Profits Interests based on their pro rata share of the incremental increase in assigned value of the Company above the point at which the respective units were issued.

 

On December 31, 2006, the Company initiated a capital restructuring, wherein all of the outstanding Compensatory Units and Capital Units were exchanged for new units on a percentage basis determined by the outstanding units’ relative fair values. These new units all retained the same earnings sharing and voting rights, but participate in the potential liquidation of the Company on a pro rata basis. The Company and unitholders each had fair-value put and call provisions, subject to certain restrictions, that allowed for redemption only for vested units that have been held longer than six months. New units exchanged for units previously issued retained their original liability classification. Of the total $696.3 million increase in value arising from the change from a formula-based redemption plan to a fair-value plan, approximately $232.5 million was associated with compensatory unit awards and charged to compensation expense on December 31, 2006. The remaining $463.8 million was recorded as a component of interest on mandatorily redeemable units for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

The Operating Agreement was amended as of March 31, 2007 to eliminate the Company’s obligation to redeem units under any circumstance. As a result, all units that were categorized as liabilities in the Company’s consolidated financial statements were reclassified as equity as of March 31, 2007. Subsequent to this date, distributions paid on unit-based compensation and incremental changes to these units’ value are not considered a component of compensation expense and are instead recorded as a direct reduction of undistributed earnings. As of

 

 

Compensation expense associated with the Company’s Compensatory Units, consisting of Profits-Only Interests and Class C Profits Interests, is comprised of the following:

 

 

 

In 2007, the Company granted 129,000 options to purchase Capital Units to certain employees and members pursuant to the Pzena Investment Management, LLC 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These options vest ratably over a four-year period and were issued at a strike price of $13.53, which was equal to the assessed fair market value per unit at the time of award issuance. The Company determined that the total grant-date fair value of these options was approximately $2.0 million, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized approximately $2.0 million in other non-cash compensation expense associated with the accelerated amortization of the grant-date fair value of these options.

 

 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options issued in 2007 was $13.53.

 

Except as otherwise provided by law, the liability of a member of the Company is limited to the amount of its capital account. A member may transfer or assign all, or any part of, its membership interest to any other party (a “Transferee”). A Transferee of such membership interest shall not become a member unless its membership in the Company is unanimously approved by the then existing member(s) in writing. Any Transferee admitted as a member shall succeed to the capital account or portion thereof transferred or assigned, as if no such transfer or assignment had occurred.

 

On February 13, 2007, the Company accelerated the vesting of 285,000 of the 315,500 Class A Voting Units that were granted on January 1, 2007 pursuant to its 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and repurchased them from a departing employee. The charge associated with this acceleration was approximately $3.8 million and has been included in compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

 

In 2003, the Company issued immediately vested options to purchase Capital Units to a member, exercisable at various prices and expiring in September 2013. In each of January 2004, 2005 and 2006, the terms of the grant were amended to adjust for the dilutive effect of the issuance of additional members’ equity interests. The Company accounted for these options using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25. No compensation cost associated with these grants and their subsequent modifications has been reflected in net income, as all such options had exercise prices in excess of fair market value on the date of grant or modification. If the Company had recorded compensation cost for these options based on the fair value of the options on the date of grant consistent with FAS 123(R), the impact on the Company’s net income would not have been material.

 

On January 1, 2006, the Company effected a 600-for-1 unit split. On July 17, 2007, the Company effected an additional 5-for-1 unit split. All unit and per unit amounts have been adjusted to reflect these splits.

 

 

Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)

 

Company it does not own as a non-controlling interest in its consolidated financial statements, and (ii) Pzena Investment Management, Inc.’s income will be generated by its 9.5% economic interest in the Company’s net income.

 

In connection with the reorganization and initial public offering, the Company made a distribution of approximately $18.5 million on October 19, 2007, which represented all of the remaining undistributed earnings generated through the consummation of the transactions, less any amounts required to fund working capital needs.

 

On November 21, 2007, a putative class action lawsuit was commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Pzena Investment Management, Inc. and Richard S. Pzena, its chief executive officer, seeking remedies under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The complaint alleges that the registration statement and prospectus relating to the initial public offering of the Class A common stock of Pzena Investment Management, Inc. contained materially misleading statements and otherwise failed to disclose a pattern of net redemptions in the John Hancock Classic Value Fund for which the Company acts as sub-investment advisor (which is a portion of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.’s Large Cap Value investment strategy). The plaintiff seeks to represent a class of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Class A common stock in the initial public offering and seeks damages in an unspecified amount. Pzena Investment Management, Inc. believes that the allegations and claims against it and its chief executive officer are without merit and it intends to contest these claims vigorously.

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements

 

Notes to Financial Statements of Pzena Investment Management, Inc. (unaudited)

 

 

Pzena Investment Management, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 8, 2007. On May 10, 2007, the Company issued 100 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Old Common Stock”), for $100 to Richard S. Pzena, the sole director of the Company as of that date.

 

The Company was formed for the purpose of completing a public offering and related transactions in order to carry on the business of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as a publicly-traded company. For this reason, the Company did not have any operations for the period from May 10, 2007 through September 30, 2007.

 

 

On October 5, 2007, the Company effected a 100-for-6 reverse stock split of all shares of its Old Common Stock then outstanding. All share amounts have been adjusted to reflect this split. As of the effectiveness of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s certificate of incorporation on October 30, 2007, each share of the Old Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to effectiveness was reclassified as one share of the Company’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”) and the Company was authorized to issue up to 750,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock.

 

On October 30, 2007, the Company also consummated an initial public offering of 6,100,000 shares of its Class A Common Stock, for net proceeds of approximately $99.1 million, after payment of underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses. These net proceeds were used to purchase 6,100,000 membership units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, representing 9.5% of the then outstanding membership units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, from two outside investors and one former employee of Pzena Investment Management, LLC. Concurrently with the consummation of the Company’s initial public offering, the operating agreement of Pzena Investment Management, LLC was amended and restated such that, among other things, (i) the Company became the sole managing member of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, (ii) the 6,100,00 membership units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC that the Company acquired were reclassified as Class A Units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, (iii) an additional 11,118 Class A Units were issued to the Company in respect of its issuance of 11,112 shares of Class A Common Stock to certain directors of the Company on October 30, 2007, and its contribution of the $100 the Company received in exchange for its issuance of six shares of Class A Common Stock on May 10, 2007, and (iv) the holders of the remaining 90.5% of the outstanding membership units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC were reclassified as Class B Units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC. The acquisition of the Pzena Investment Management, LLC membership interests by the Company will be treated as a reorganization of entities under common control pursuant to the guidance set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Bulletin No. 85-5, Issues Relating to Accounting for Business Combinations (“FTB 85-5”). Accordingly, the net assets assumed by the Company through the offering will be reported at Pzena Investment Management, LLC’s historical cost basis. As a result of these transactions, as of and subsequent to October 30, 2007, (i) the Company will consolidate the financial results of Pzena Investment Management, LLC with its own and reflect the 90.5% membership interest in Pzena Investment Management, LLC it does not own as a non-controlling interest in its consolidated financial statements, and (ii) the Company’s income will be generated by its 9.5% economic interest in Pzena Investment Management, LLC’s net income.

 

On November 21, 2007, a putative class action lawsuit was commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and Richard S. Pzena, its chief executive officer, seeking remedies under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The complaint alleges that the registration statement and prospectus relating to the initial public offering of the Class A Common Stock contained materially misleading statements and otherwise failed to disclose a pattern of net redemptions in the John Hancock Classic Value Fund for which the Company acts as sub-investment advisor (which is a portion of the Company’s Large Cap Value investment strategy). The plaintiff seeks to represent a class of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Class A Common Stock in the initial public offering and seeks damages in an unspecified amount. The Company believes that the allegations and claims against it and its chief executive officer are without merit. The Company intends to contest these claims vigorously.

 

 

Overview

 

We are an investment management firm that utilizes a classic value investment approach in each of our investment strategies. We currently manage assets in ten value-oriented investment strategies across a wide range of market capitalizations in both U.S. and international capital markets. From December 31, 2002 to September 30, 2007, our assets under management, or AUM grew from $3.1 billion to $28.9 billion, representing a compound annual growth rate of 60%. As of September 30, 2007, we managed separate accounts on behalf of over 375 institutions and high net worth individuals and acted as sub-investment adviser for twelve SEC-registered mutual funds and ten offshore funds.

 

The results of operations discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are the historical consolidated results of operations of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, our operating company as of the consummation of the reorganization of Pzena Investment Management, LLC and the concurrent initial public offering of our Class A common stock on October 30, 2007. Pursuant to this reorganization, we became the sole managing member of Pzena Investment Management, LLC. As such, we now control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial results with ours. In light of our employees’ and other investors’ collective 90.5% membership interest in our operating company, we reflect their interests as a non-controlling interest in our consolidated financial statements. As a result, subsequent to October 30, 2007, our income will be generated by our 9.5% economic interest in our operating company’s net income, and similarly, outstanding shares of our Class A common stock will represent 9.5% of the outstanding membership units of our operating company.

 

Revenue

 

We generate revenue from management fees and incentive fees, which we collectively refer to as our advisory fees, by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as a sub-investment adviser for mutual funds and certain other investment funds. Our advisory fee income is recognized over the period in which investment management services are provided. Pursuant to the preferred accounting method under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue D-96, Accounting for Management Fees Based on a Formula (EITF D-96), income from incentive fees is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved.

 

Our advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of our AUM. Our AUM increases or decreases with the net inflows or outflows of funds into our various investment strategies and with the investment performance thereon. In order to increase our AUM and expand our business, we must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of our target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. The value and composition of our AUM, and our ability to continue to attract clients, will depend on a variety of factors including, among other things:

 

 

For our separately-managed accounts, we are paid fees according to a schedule which varies by investment strategy. The substantial majority of these accounts pay us management fees pursuant to a schedule in which the rate we earn on the AUM declines as the amount of AUM increases, subject to a minimum fee to manage each account. Certain of these clients pay us fees according to the performance of their accounts relative to certain agreed-upon

benchmarks, which results in a slightly lower base fee, but allows us to earn higher fees if the relevant investment strategy outperforms the agreed-upon benchmark.

 

Pursuant to our sub-investment advisory agreements, we are generally paid a management fee according to a schedule, in which the rate we earn on the AUM declines as the amount of AUM increases. Certain of these funds pay us fixed rate management fees. Due to the substantially larger account size of certain of these accounts, the average advisory fees we earn on them are lower than the advisory fees we earn on our separately-managed accounts.

 

The majority of advisory fees we earn on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of AUM at a specific date on a quarterly basis, either in arrears or advance. Advisory fees on certain of our separately-managed accounts, and with respect to most of the mutual funds that we sub-advise, are calculated based on the average of the monthly or daily market value. Advisory fees are also adjusted for any cash flows into or out of a portfolio, where the cash flow represents greater than 10% of the value of the portfolio. While a specific group of accounts may use the same fee rate, the method used to calculate the fee according to the fee rate schedule may differ as described above.

 

Our advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

 

 

Expenses

 

Our expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits expenses, as well as general and administrative expenses. These expenses may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including the following:

 

 

Compensation and Benefits Expense

 

Our largest expense is compensation and benefits, which includes the salaries, bonuses, equity-based compensation and related benefits and payroll costs attributable to our members and employees. All compensation and benefits packages, including those of our executive officers, are benchmarked against relevant industry and geographic peer groups in order to attract and retain qualified personnel. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, a general rise in compensation and benefits expense commensurate with growth in headcount and with the need to maintain competitive compensation levels.

The table included in the section below describes the components of our compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007:

 

 

Historically, we granted profits-only interests in our operating company to selected employees. These profits-only interests entitled the holder to a share of the future distributions of our operating company. Pursuant to the terms of the operating agreement of our operating company prior to December 31, 2006, the holders of these profits-only interests had the right to require us to redeem their profits-only interests upon their termination of employment, or death, at a formula value equal to their pro rata share of our net investment advisory fee revenues for the four completed fiscal quarters preceding their termination, or death, as applicable. We have accounted for the distributions on profits-only interests, as well as the annual increase in their redemption value, in our operating company’s financial statements as compensation expense. On December 31, 2006, all then outstanding profits-only interests in our operating company were exchanged for capital units and our operating company’s operating agreement was amended to, among other things, change the formula pursuant to which it would be required to redeem the previously granted profits-only interests, subsequently exchanged for capital units, to one based on the fair market value of our firm. The change in the redemption value required us to a take a one-time compensation charge of $232.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2006, which was recorded as compensation expense, with respect to the capital units deemed compensatory. Our operating company’s operating agreement was further amended as of March 31, 2007 to eliminate its obligation to redeem units under any circumstance. As all of its membership units thereafter had only equity characteristics, neither distributions nor subsequent incremental changes to their value were charged against income from the date of the amendment. As of March 31, 2007, we accelerated the vesting of all compensatory units then subject to vesting. The one-time charge associated with this acceleration, approximately $65.0 million, was recorded on March 31, 2007.

 

On January 1, 2007, we adopted the PIM LLC 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, pursuant to which we have issued restricted capital units, and options to acquire capital units, in our operating company, both of which were to vest ratably over a four-year period. We used a fair-value method in recording the compensation expense associated with the granting of these restricted capital units, and options to acquire capital units, to new and existing members under the PIM LLC 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Under this method, compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award and is recognized over the award’s vesting period. The fair value for the capital units will be determined by reference to the market price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant, since these units are exchangeable for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. The fair value for the options to acquire capital units will be determined by using an appropriate option pricing model on the grant date.

 

On January 1, 2007, we instituted a deferred compensation plan, in which employees who earn in excess of $600,000 per year are required to defer a portion of their compensation in excess of this amount. These deferred amounts may be invested, at the employee’s discretion, in certain of our investment strategies, restricted capital units of our operating company, or money market funds. All of these deferred amounts vest ratably over a four-year period and, therefore, will be reflected in our expenses over this period. Accordingly, our 2007 cash compensation expense will be lower than it would have been had we not instituted a deferred compensation plan. For the four-year period beginning in 2008, we expect the non-cash portion of our compensation expense associated with this

deferred compensation plan to increase each successive year as these and subsequently deferred amounts are amortized through income.

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

General and administrative expenses include professional and outside services fees, office expenses, depreciation and the costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and portfolio accounting systems. Our occupancy-related costs and professional services expenses, in particular, generally increase or decrease in relative proportion to the number of employees retained by us and the overall size and scale of our business operations.

 

Following our offering on October 30, 2007, we expect that we will incur additional expenses as a result of becoming a public company for, among other things, director and officer insurance, director fees, SEC reporting and compliance (including Sarbanes-Oxley compliance), transfer agent fees, professional fees and other similar expenses. These additional expenses will reduce our net income.

 

Other Income

 

Other income is derived primarily from interest income generated on our excess cash balances and investment income arising from our investments in various private investment vehicles that we employ to incubate new strategies. We expect the interest and investment components of other income, in the aggregate, to fluctuate based on market conditions, the success of our investment strategies and our dividend policy.

 

Minority and Non-Controlling Interests

 

We have historically consolidated the results of operations of the private investment partnerships over which we exercise a controlling influence. After our reorganization, we are the sole managing member of our operating company and now control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial results with ours. In light of our employees’ and outside investors’ 90.5% interest in our operating company immediately after the consummation of our reorganization, we will reflect their membership interests as a non-controlling interest in our consolidated financial statements. As a result, subsequent to October 30, 2007, our income will be generated from our 9.5% economic interest in our operating company’s net income, and similarly, outstanding shares of our Class A common stock will represent 9.5% of the outstanding membership units of our operating company.

 

Provision for Income Tax

 

While our operating company has historically not been subject to U.S. federal and certain state income taxes, it has been subject to the New York City Unincorporated Business Tax (UBT). As a result of our reorganization, we are now subject to taxes applicable to C-corporations. We expect our effective tax rate, and the absolute dollar amount of our tax expense, to increase as a result of our reorganization.

 

Interest on Mandatorily Redeemable Units

 

Capital units in our operating company include capital units issued to our founders and those purchased by certain of our employees. These capital units entitle the holder to a share of the distributions of our operating company.

 

We have adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, or FAS 150. FAS 150 establishes classification and measurement standards for three types of free-standing financial instruments that have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Instruments within the scope of FAS 150 must be classified as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and be reported at settlement date value. FAS 150 was effective for us as of July 1, 2003. Prior to January 1, 2005, capital units in our operating company were mandatorily redeemable at book value. Effective January 1, 2005, the operating agreement of our operating company was amended to require that capital units be mandatorily redeemed upon a holder’s death based on such holder’s pro rata share of our operating company’s net fee revenue (as defined in the operating agreement) for the four completed fiscal quarters immediately preceding

the holder’s death. These redemption amounts were exclusive of any accumulated undistributed earnings associated with these capital units, which were required to be paid additionally to the holder’s estate. Pursuant to FAS 150, distributions on capital units, and incremental changes in the net liability associated with their redemption value, were recorded as a component of interest on mandatorily redeemable units in our consolidated statements of operations beginning in 2003.

 

On December 31, 2006, the operating agreement of our operating company was amended to, among other things, change the formula pursuant to which we would be required to redeem the capital units to one based on the fair market valuation of our firm. The restated terms of redemption required us to a take a charge of $463.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2006, which was included in interest on mandatorily redeemable units. The operating agreement of our operating company was further amended as of March 31, 2007, such that our operating company will no longer be required to redeem any capital units for cash upon any member’s death or, if applicable, their termination of employment. Accordingly, beginning with our financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2007, we no longer have any expense for interest on mandatorily redeemable units.

 

 

The growth of our AUM in our separately-managed accounts and our sub-advised accounts from December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2007 is described below: