Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2008
Registration No. 333-152973
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
 
 
VERISK ANALYTICS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
         
Delaware   7374   26-2994223
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 
545 Washington Boulevard
Jersey City, NJ 07310-1686
(201) 469-2000
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)
 
 
 
 
Kenneth E. Thompson
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
545 Washington Boulevard
Jersey City, NJ 07310-1686
(201) 469-2000
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent For Service)
 
 
 
 
Copies to:
     
Richard J. Sandler
Ethan T. James
Davis Polk & Wardwell
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
(212) 450-4000
  Eric J. Friedman
Richard B. Aftanas
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Four Times Square
New York, New York 10036
(212) 735-3000
 
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
 
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.   o
 
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.   o                  
 
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.   o                  
 
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.   o                  
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  o Non-accelerated filer  þ Smaller reporting company  o
                                       (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
 
 
             
Title of Each Class
    Proposed Maximum Aggregate
    Amount of
of Securities to be Registered     Offering Price(1)(2)     Registration Fee
Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share
    $750,000,000     $29,475(3)
             
(1)  Includes shares of Class A common stock which the underwriters have the right to purchase to cover over-allotments.
 
(2)  Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933.
 
(3)  Previously paid.
 
      The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
 


Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
 
(Subject to Completion)
 
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
Dated October 7, 2008
 
          Shares
 
(VERISK ANALYTICS, INC. LOGO)
 
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
 
Class A Common Stock
 
 
 
 
This is our initial public offering of common stock. Our stockholders are selling all of the shares of our Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, offered by this prospectus. We are not selling any shares in this offering. We expect the public offering price to be between $      and $      per share. Currently, no public market exists for the shares.
 
After pricing of the offering, we expect that the shares will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “     .”
 
Investing in our common stock involves risks that are described in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 10 of this prospectus.
 
 
 
 
         
   
Per Share
  Total
 
Public offering price
  $          $       
Underwriting discount
  $          $       
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders
  $          $       
 
The underwriters may also purchase up to an additional           shares of Class A common stock from the selling stockholders at the initial public offering price, less the underwriting discount, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus to cover over-allotments, if any.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
The shares will be ready for delivery on or about          , 2008.
 
 
 
 
Merrill Lynch & Co. Morgan Stanley
 
 
 
 
          , 2008


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    Page
 
    1  
    10  
    20  
    20  
    21  
    22  
    22  
    23  
    24  
    26  
    49  
    70  
    88  
    92  
    94  
    98  
    100  
    102  
    106  
    106  
    106  
    F-1  
  EX-10.3: FORM OF LETTER AGREEMENT
  EX-10.4: FORM OF MASTER LICENSE AGREEMENT AND PARTICIPATION SUPPLEMENT
  EX-23.1: CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  EX-23.2: CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  EX-23.3: CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
 
 
 
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We and the selling stockholders have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. We and the selling stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of Class A common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the common stock.
 
Prior to the completion of this offering, we will have effected an internal reorganization whereby our predecessor, Insurance Services Office, Inc., or ISO, will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and all outstanding shares of ISO common stock will be replaced with common stock of the Company. We will immediately thereafter effect an approximately     -for-one split of our common stock. Unless otherwise stated herein or the context otherwise requires, the terms “Verisk,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Verisk Analytics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the reorganization described above, and prior to such reorganization these terms refer to ISO and its consolidated subsidiaries through which we are currently conducting our operations. In addition, except as the context otherwise requires, the share and per share information in this prospectus gives effect to the stock split that will occur immediately after the reorganization.
 
Until          , 2008, 25 days after the commencement of this offering, all dealers that buy, sell, or trade shares of our common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the dealers’ obligations to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.


i


Table of Contents

 
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the information that you should consider before deciding to invest in our Class A common stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors” section and the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements.
 
Company Overview
 
We enable risk-bearing businesses to better understand and manage their risks. We provide value to our customers by supplying proprietary data that, combined with our analytic methods, creates embedded decision support solutions. We are the largest aggregator and provider of detailed actuarial and underwriting data pertaining to U.S. property and casualty, or P&C, insurance risks. We offer solutions for detecting fraud in the U.S. P&C insurance, healthcare and mortgage industries, and sophisticated methods to predict and quantify loss in diverse contexts ranging from natural catastrophes to health insurance.
 
Our customers use our solutions, in the form of our data, statistical models or tailored analytics, to make more logical decisions. We develop solutions which our customers use to analyze the four key processes in managing risk, in what we define as the Verisk Risk Analysis Framework: Prediction of Loss, Selection and Pricing of Risk, Detection and Prevention of Fraud, and Quantification of Loss.
 
We organize our business in two segments: Risk Assessment and Decision Analytics.
 
Risk Assessment:   We are the leading provider of statistical, actuarial and underwriting data for the U.S. P&C insurance industry. Our proprietary and unique databases describe premiums and losses in insurance transactions, casualty and property risk attributes for commercial buildings and their occupants and fire suppression capabilities of municipalities in addition to other properties and attributes. Our largest P&C insurance database includes nearly 14 billion records, and, in each of the past three years, we updated the database with over 2 billion validated new records. We use our data, for example, to create policy language and proprietary risk classifications that are industry standard and to generate prospective loss cost estimates used to price insurance policies.
 
Decision Analytics:   We provide solutions in each of the four processes of the Verisk Risk Analysis Framework by combining algorithms and analytic methods, which incorporate our proprietary data. Our unique data sets include approximately 600 million P&C insurance claims, historic natural catastrophe data covering more than 50 countries, data from more than 13 million applications for mortgage loans and over 300 million U.S. criminal records. Customers integrate our solutions into their models, formulas or underwriting criteria to predict potential loss events, ranging from hurricanes and earthquakes to unanticipated healthcare claims. We are a leading developer of catastrophe and extreme event models and offer solutions covering natural and man-made risks, including acts of terrorism. We also develop solutions that allow customers to quantify costs after loss events occur. Our fraud solutions include data on claim histories, analysis of mortgage applications to identify misinformation, analysis of claims to find emerging patterns of fraud and identification of suspicious claims in the insurance, healthcare and mortgage sectors.
 
We believe our solutions for analyzing risk positively impact our customers’ revenues and help them better manage their costs. The embedded nature of our solutions serves to strengthen and extend our relationships. In 2007, our U.S. customers included all of the top 100 P&C insurance providers, four of the 10 largest Blue Cross Blue Shield plans, four of the seven leading mortgage insurers, 14 of the top 20 mortgage lenders, and 8 of the 10 largest global reinsurers. Approximately 96% of our top 200 customers in 2007, as ranked by revenue, have been our customers for each of the last five years. Further, from 2003 to 2007, revenues generated from these top 200 customers grew at a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 13%.
 
We offer our solutions and services primarily through annual subscriptions or long-term agreements, which are typically pre-paid and represented approximately 74% of our revenues in 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, we had revenues of $802 million and $438 million, respectively, and net income of $150 million and $81 million, respectively. For the five year


1


Table of Contents

period ended December 31, 2007, our revenues and net income have grown at a CAGR of 13.8% and 21.2%, respectively.
 
Our Market Opportunity
 
We believe there is a long-term trend for companies to set strategy and direct operations using data and analytics to guide their decisions, which has resulted in a large and rapidly growing market for professional and business information. According to Veronis Suhler Stevenson, an industry consultant, in a report dated September 2006, spending on professional and business information services in the U.S. reached $61 billion in 2005 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 8% through 2010. Another research firm, International Data Corporation, or IDC, in a report dated March 2008, estimates that the business analytics services market, which totaled $32 billion in 2007, will grow at a CAGR of 9% through 2012.
 
We believe that the consistent decline in the cost of computing power contributes to the trend towards greater use of data and analytics. As a result, larger data sets are assembled faster and at a lower cost per record while the complexity and accuracy of analytical applications and solutions have expanded. This trend has led to an increase in the use of analytic output, which can be generated and applied more quickly, resulting in more informed decision making. As computing power increases, cost decreases and accuracy improves, we believe customers will continue to apply and integrate data and analytic solutions more broadly.
 
Companies that engage in risk transactions, including P&C insurers, healthcare payors and mortgage lenders and insurers, are particularly motivated to use enhanced analytics because of several factors affecting risk markets, including:
 
  •      the total value of exposures in risk transactions is increasing;
 
  •      the number of participants in risk transactions is often large and the asymmetry of information among participants is often substantial; and
 
  •      the failure to understand risk can lead to large and rapid declines in financial performance.
 
Our Competitive Strengths
 
We believe our competitive strengths include the following:
 
  •      Our Solutions are Embedded In Our Customers’ Critical Decision Processes.   Our customers use our solutions to make better risk decisions and to price risk appropriately. In the U.S. P&C insurance industry, our solutions for prospective loss costs, policy language, rating/underwriting rules and regulatory filing services are the industry standard. In the U.S. healthcare and mortgage industries, our predictive models, loss estimation tools and fraud identification applications are the primary solutions that allow customers to understand their risk exposures and proactively manage them. Over the last three years, we have retained 98% of our customers across all of our businesses, which we believe reflects our customers’ recognition of the value they derive from our solutions.
 
  •      Extensive and Differentiated Data Assets and Analytic Methods.   We maintain what we believe are some of the largest, most accurate, and most complete databases in the markets we serve. Much of the information we provide is not available from any other source and would be difficult and costly for another party to replicate. As a result, our accumulated experience and years of significant investment have given us a competitive advantage in serving our customers.
 
  •      Culture of Continuous Improvement.   Our intellectual capital and focus on continuous improvement have allowed us to develop proprietary algorithms and solutions that assist our customers in making informed risk decisions. Our team includes approximately 390 individuals with advanced degrees, certifications and professional designations in such fields as actuarial science, data management, mathematics, statistics, economics, soil mechanics, meteorology and various engineering disciplines. Our compensation and benefit plans are pay-for-performance-


2


Table of Contents

  oriented, including incentive compensation plans and substantial equity participation by employees. Today, our employees own approximately 30% of the company.
 
  •      Attractive Operating Model.   We believe we have an attractive operating model due to the recurring nature of our revenues, the scalability of our solutions and the low capital intensity of our business.
 
Our Growth Strategy
 
Over the past five years, we have grown our revenues at a CAGR of 13.8% through the successful execution of our business plan. These results reflect strong organic revenue growth, new product development and selected acquisitions. We have made, and continue to make, investments in people, data sets, analytic solutions, technology, and complementary businesses. The key components of our strategy include:
 
  •      Increase Sales to Insurance Customers.   We expect to expand the application of our solutions in insurance customers’ internal risk and underwriting processes. Building on our deep knowledge of, and embedded position in, the insurance industry, we expect to sell more solutions to existing customers tailored to individual insurance segments. By increasing the breadth and relevance of our offerings, we believe we can strengthen our relationships with customers and increase our value to their decision making in critical ways.
 
  •      Develop New, Proprietary Data Sets and Predictive Analytics.   We work with our customers to understand their evolving needs. We plan to create new solutions by enriching our mix of proprietary data sets, analytic solutions and effective decision support across the markets we serve. We constantly seek to add new data sets that can further leverage our analytic methods, technology platforms and intellectual capital.
 
  •      Leverage Our Intellectual Capital to Expand into Adjacent Markets and New Customer Sectors.   Our organization is built on nearly four decades of intellectual property in risk management. We believe we can continue to profitably expand the use of our intellectual capital and apply our analytic methods in new markets, where significant opportunities for long-term growth exist. We also continue to pursue growth through targeted international expansion. We have already demonstrated the effectiveness of this strategy with our expansion into healthcare and non-insurance financial services.
 
  •      Pursue Strategic Acquisitions that Complement Our Leadership Positions.   We will continue to expand our data and analytics capabilities across industries. While we expect this will occur primarily through organic growth, we have and will continue to acquire assets and businesses that strengthen our value proposition to customers. We have developed an internal capability to source, evaluate and integrate acquisitions that have created value for shareholders. We have acquired 14 businesses in the past five years, which in the aggregate have increased their revenue with a weighted average CAGR of 40% over the same period.
 
Risk Factors
 
Investing in our common stock involves substantial risk. Please read “Risk Factors” beginning on page 10 for a discussion of certain factors you should consider in evaluating an investment in our common stock.


3


Table of Contents

Corporate History and Information
 
We were formed in 1971 as an advisory and rating organization for the P&C insurance industry to provide statistical and actuarial services, to develop insurance programs and to assist insurance companies in meeting state regulatory requirements. Over the past decade, we have transformed our business by deepening and broadening our data assets, entering new markets, placing a greater emphasis on analytics and pursing strategic acquisitions to enhance these efforts. Members of our senior management operating team have been with us for an average of almost twenty years. This team has led our transformation to a successful for-profit entity and our expansion from P&C insurance into a variety of new markets.
 
Our principal executive offices are located at 545 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, New Jersey, 07310-1686 and our telephone number is (201) 469-2000.


4


Table of Contents

THE OFFERING
 
Class A common stock offered by the selling stockholders            shares
 
Class A common stock outstanding            shares
 
Over-allotment option            shares of Class A common stock from the selling stockholders
 
Class B common stock outstanding            shares
 
Sale and transfer restrictions on Class B common stock The Class B (Series 1) common stock is not transferable until 18 months after the date of this prospectus and the Class B (Series 2) common stock is not transferable until 30 months after the date of this prospectus.
 
These transfer restrictions are subject to limited exceptions, including transfers to another holder of Class B common stock. See “Description of Capital Stock — Common Stock — Transfer Restrictions.”
 
Conversion of Class B common stock After termination of the restrictions on transfer described above for each series of Class B common stock, such series of Class B common stock will be automatically converted into Class A common stock. No later than 30 months after the date of this prospectus, there will be no outstanding shares of Class B common stock.
 
In the event that Class B common stock is transferred and converts into Class A common stock, it will have the effect of diluting the voting power of our existing holders of Class A common stock. See “Description of Capital Stock — Common Stock — Conversion.”
 
Use of proceeds The Company will not receive any proceeds from sale of Class A common stock in the offering.
 
Dividend policy Following this offering and subject to legally available funds, we currently intend to pay a quarterly dividend, in cash, at an annual rate initially equal to $      per share of Class A common stock (representing a quarterly rate initially equal to $      per share) commencing with the quarter ended          , 2008. Our Class B common stock will share ratably on an as-converted basis in such dividends. The declaration and payment of any dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, covenants in our debt instruments and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant.
 
Stock symbol


5


Table of Contents

 
Unless the context requires otherwise, the number of shares of our Class A common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on the number of shares outstanding as of June 30, 2008, giving effect to the stock split of          -for-one that will have occurred prior to the completion of this offering. The number of shares of our Class A common stock to be outstanding after this offering does not take into account, unless the context otherwise requires:
 
  •                 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2008 at a weighted average exercise price of $      per share; and
 
  •      an aggregate of           shares of Class A common stock that will be reserved for future issuances under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan as of the closing of this offering.


6


Table of Contents

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
 
The following summary historical financial data should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 is derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2008 are derived from unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that are included in this prospectus and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2007 is derived from unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that is not included in this prospectus. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, in our opinion, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations and financial position. Results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 or any future period.
 
Since January 1, 2005 we have acquired 10 businesses, which may affect the comparability of our financial statements.
 
                                         
          Six Months
 
    Year Ended December 31,     Ended June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data)  
 
Statement of income data:
                                       
Revenues:
                                       
Risk Assessment revenues
  $ 448,875     $ 472,634     $ 485,160     $ 244,556     $ 253,356  
Decision Analytics revenues
    196,785       257,499       317,035       155,432       184,334  
                                         
Revenues
    645,660       730,133       802,195       399,988       437,690  
                                         
Expenses:
                                       
Cost of revenues
    294,911       331,804       357,191       176,502       190,678  
Selling, general and administrative
    88,723       100,124       107,576       55,600       59,028  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    22,024       28,007       31,745       15,498       16,424  
Amortization of intangible assets
    19,800       26,854       33,916       17,240       14,937  
                                         
Total expenses
    425,458       486,789       530,428       264,840       281,067  
                                         
Operating income
    220,202       243,344       271,767       135,148       156,623  
Other income/(expense):
                                       
Investment income and realized gains on securities, net
    2,932       6,101       9,308       4,963       317  
Interest expense
    (10,465 )     (16,668 )     (22,928 )     (11,474 )     (14,173 )
                                         
Total other expense, net
    (7,533 )     (10,567 )     (13,620 )     (6,511 )     (13,856 )
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    212,669       232,777       258,147       128,637       142,767  
Provision for income taxes
    (85,722 )     (86,921 )     (103,184 )     (52,432 )     (61,818 )
                                         
Income from continuing operations
    126,947       145,856       154,963       76,205       80,949  


7


Table of Contents

                                         
          Six Months
 
    Year Ended December 31,     Ended June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data)  
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(1)
    (2,574 )     (1,805 )     (4,589 )     (1,302 )      
                                         
Net income
  $ 124,373     $ 144,051     $ 150,374     $ 74,903     $ 80,949  
                                         
Basic income/(loss) per share (2) :
                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 29.81     $ 35.31     $ 38.58     $ 18.69     $ 21.73  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (0.61 )     (0.44 )     (1.14 )     (0.32 )      
                                         
Net income per share
  $ 29.20     $ 34.87     $ 37.44     $ 18.37     $ 21.73  
                                         
Diluted income/(loss) per share:
                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 28.45     $ 33.85     $ 37.03     $ 17.97     $ 20.87  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (0.58 )     (0.42 )     (1.10 )     (0.31 )      
                                         
Net income per share
  $ 27.87     $ 33.43     $ 35.93     $ 17.66     $ 20.87  
                                         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                                       
Basic
    4,258,989       4,130,962       4,016,928       4,077,259       3,724,876  
                                         
Diluted
    4,462,109       4,308,976       4,185,151       4,240,053       3,877,906  
                                         
Other data:
                                       
EBITDA(3):
                                       
Risk Assessment EBITDA
  $ 195,951     $ 202,872     $ 212,780     $ 104,819     $ 113,500  
Decision Analytics EBITDA
    66,075       95,333       124,648       63,067       74,484  
                                         
EBITDA
  $ 262,026     $ 298,205     $ 337,428     $ 167,886     $ 187,984  
                                         
Purchases of fixed assets
  $ (24,019 )   $ (25,742 )   $ (32,941 )   $ (23,050 )   $ (17,810 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    174,071       223,499       248,521       117,136       141,929  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (107,444 )     (243,452 )     (110,831 )     (49,403 )     (98,402 )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (90,954 )     75,907       (212,591 )     (127,194 )     (16,759 )
 
                                         
    As of December 31,     As of June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
                (In thousands)              
 
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 42,822     $ 99,152     $ 24,049     $ 39,826     $ 50,835  
Total assets
    466,244       744,731       828,483       779,465       866,839  
Total debt(4)
    276,964       448,698       438,330       401,700       642,182  
Redeemable common stock(5)
    901,089       1,125,933       1,171,188       1,211,422       1,006,287  
Stockholders’ deficit
    (938,294 )     (1,116,357 )     (1,195,728 )     (1,203,279 )     (1,178,947 )
 
(1) As of December 31, 2007, we discontinued operations of our claim consulting business located in New Hope, Pennsylvania and the United Kingdom.
 
(2) In conjunction with the initial public offering, the stock of Insurance Services Office, Inc. will convert to stock of Verisk Analytics, Inc., which plans to effect a stock split of its common stock. Giving effect to the approximately          -for-one stock split that will have occurred prior to the completion of this offering, basic earnings per share from continuing operations and discontinued operations would have been $      and $     , $      and $     , and $      and $      for each of the years ended December 31,

8


Table of Contents

2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $      and $      and $      and $      for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Diluted earnings per shares from continuing operations and discontinued operations would have been $      and $     , $      and $      , and $      and $      for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and $      and $      and $      and $      for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
 
(3) EBITDA is the financial measure which management uses to evaluate the performance of our segments. “EBITDA” is defined as income from continuing operations before investment income and interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. See note 18 to our audited consolidated financial statements and note 16 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
Although EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for an analysis of our results of operations or cash flow from operating activities reported under U.S. GAAP. Management uses EBITDA in conjunction with traditional GAAP operating performance measures as part of its overall assessment of company performance. Some of these limitations are:
 
•     EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
 
•     EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
 
•     Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced in the future and EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and
 
•     Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
 
The following is a reconciliation of income from continuing operations to EBITDA:
 
                                         
          Six Months
 
    Year Ended December 31,     Ended June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 126,947     $ 145,856     $ 154,963     $ 76,205     $ 80,949  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets
    41,824       54,861       65,661       32,738       31,361  
Interest expense
    10,465       16,668       22,928       11,474       14,173  
Investment income and realized gains on securities, net
    (2,932 )     (6,101 )     (9,308 )     (4,963 )     (317 )
Provision for income taxes
    85,722       86,921       103,184       52,432       61,818  
                                         
EBITDA
  $ 262,026     $ 298,205     $ 337,428       167,886       187,984  
 
(4) Includes capital lease obligations.
 
(5) Prior to this offering, we are required to record our Class A common stock and vested options at redemption value at each balance sheet date as the redemption of these securities is not solely within our control, due to our contractual obligations to redeem these shares. We classify this redemption value as redeemable common stock. Subsequent to this offering, we will no longer be obligated to redeem these shares and therefore we will not be required to record any redeemable common stock.


9


Table of Contents

 
RISK FACTORS
 
You should carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this prospectus before deciding to invest in shares of our Class A common stock. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
We could lose our access to data from external sources which could prevent us from providing our solutions.
 
We depend upon data from external sources, including data received from customers and various government and public record services, for information used in our databases. In general, we do not own the information in these databases, and the participating organizations could discontinue contributing information to the databases. Our data sources could withdraw or increase the price for their data for a variety of reasons, and we could also become subject to legislative or judicial restrictions on the use of such data, in particular if such data is not collected by the third parties in a way which allows us to legally use and/or process the data. In addition, many of our customers are significant stockholders of our company. Specifically, all of our Class B common stock is owned by insurers who are also our customers and provide us with a significant percentage of our data. If our customers’ percentage of ownership of our common stock decreases in the future, including as a result of this offering, there can be no assurance that our customers will continue to provide data to the same extent or on the same terms. If a substantial number of data sources, or certain key sources, were to withdraw or be unable to provide their data, or if we were to lose access to data due to government regulation or if the collection of data became uneconomical, our ability to provide solutions to our customers could be impacted, which could materially adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
 
Agreements with our data suppliers are short-term agreements. Some suppliers are also competitors, which may make us vulnerable to unpredictable price increases and may cause some suppliers not to renew certain agreements. Our competitors could also enter into exclusive contracts with our data sources. If our competitors enter into such exclusive contracts, we may be precluded from receiving certain data from these suppliers or restricted in our use of such data, which would give our competitors an advantage. Such a termination or exclusive contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and operating results if we were unable to arrange for substitute sources.
 
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the U.S. P&C insurance industry. If there is a downturn in the U.S. insurance industry or that industry does not continue to accept our solutions, our revenues will decline.
 
Revenues derived from solutions we provide to the U.S. P&C insurance industry account for a substantial portion of our total revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, approximately 67% of our revenue was derived from solutions provided to the U.S. P&C insurance industry. Also, sales of certain of our solutions are tied to premiums in the U.S. P&C insurance market, which may rise or fall in any given year due to loss experience and capital capacity and other factors in the insurance industry beyond our control. In addition, our revenues will decline if the insurance industry does not continue to accept these solutions. Factors that might affect the acceptance of these solutions by P&C insurers include the following:
 
  •      changes in the business analytics industry;
 
  •      changes in technology;
 
  •      our inability to obtain or use state fee schedule or claims data in our insurance solutions;
 
  •      saturation of market demand;
 
  •      loss of key customers;


10


Table of Contents

  •      industry consolidation; and
 
  •      failure to execute our customer-focused selling approach.
 
A downturn in the insurance industry or lower acceptance of our solutions by the insurance industry could result in a decline in revenues from that industry and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
There may be consolidation in our end customer market, which would reduce the use of our services.
 
Mergers or consolidations among our customers could reduce the number of our customers and potential customers. This could adversely affect our revenues even if these events do not reduce the aggregate number of customers or the activities of the consolidated entities. If our customers merge with or are acquired by other entities that are not our customers, or that use fewer of our services, they may discontinue or reduce their use of our services. The adverse effects of consolidation will be greater in sectors that we are particularly dependent upon, for example, in the P&C insurance services sector. Any of these developments could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
 
If we are unable to develop successful new solutions or if we experience defects, failures and delays associated with the introduction of new solutions, our business could suffer serious harm.
 
Our growth and success depends upon our ability to develop and sell new solutions. If we are unable to develop new solutions, or if we are not successful in introducing and/or obtaining regulatory approval or acceptance for new solutions, we may not be able to grow our business, or growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate. In addition, significant undetected errors or delays in new solutions may affect market acceptance of our solutions and could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. In the past, we have experienced delays while developing and introducing new solutions, primarily due to difficulties developing models, acquiring data and adapting to particular operating environments. Errors or defects in our solutions that are significant, or are perceived to be significant, could result in rejection of our solutions, damage to our reputation, loss of revenues, diversion of development resources, an increase in product liability claims, and increases in service and support costs and warranty claims.
 
We will continue to rely upon proprietary technology rights, and if we are unable to protect them, our business could be harmed.
 
Our success depends, in part, upon our intellectual property rights. To date, we have relied primarily on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secret, and trademark laws and nondisclosure and other contractual restrictions on copying and distribution to protect our proprietary technology. This protection of our proprietary technology is limited, and our proprietary technology could be used by others without our consent. In addition, patents may not be issued with respect to our pending or future patent applications, and our patents may not be upheld as valid or may not prevent the development of competitive products. Any disclosure, loss, invalidity of, or failure to protect our intellectual property could negatively impact our competitive position, and ultimately, our business. Our protection of our intellectual property rights in the United States or abroad may not be adequate and others, including our competitors, may use our proprietary technology without our consent. Furthermore, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
We could face claims for intellectual property infringement, which if successful could restrict us from using and providing our technologies and solutions to our customers.
 
There has been substantial litigation and other proceedings, particularly in the United States, regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the information technology industry. There is a risk that we are infringing, or may in the future infringe, the intellectual property rights of third parties. We monitor third-party patents and patent applications that may be relevant to our technologies and solutions and


11


Table of Contents

we carry out freedom to operate analyses where we deem appropriate. However, such monitoring and analysis has not been, and is unlikely in the future to be, comprehensive, and it may not be possible to detect all potentially relevant patents and patent applications. Since the patent application process can take several years to complete, there may be currently pending applications, unknown to us, that may later result in issued patents that cover our products and technologies. As a result, we may infringe existing and future third-party patents of which we are not aware. As we expand our operations there is a higher risk that such activity could infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties.
 
Third-party intellectual property infringement claims and any resultant litigation against us or our technology partners or providers, could subject us to liability for damages, restrict us from using and providing our technologies and solutions or operating our business generally, or require changes to be made to our technologies and solutions. Even if we prevail, litigation is time consuming and expensive to defend and would result in the diversion of management’s time and attention.
 
If a successful claim of infringement is brought against us and we fail to develop non-infringing technologies and solutions or to obtain licenses on a timely and cost effective basis this could materially and adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
 
Regulatory developments could negatively impact our business.
 
Because personal, public and non-public information is stored in some of our databases, we are vulnerable to government regulation and adverse publicity concerning the use of our data. We provide many types of data and services that already are subject to regulation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the European Union’s Data Protection Directive and to a lesser extent, various other federal, state, and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are designed to protect the privacy of the public and to prevent the misuse of personal information in the marketplace. However, many consumer advocates, privacy advocates, and government regulators believe that the existing laws and regulations do not adequately protect privacy. They have become increasingly concerned with the use of personal information, particularly social security numbers, department of motor vehicle data and dates of birth. As a result, they are lobbying for further restrictions on the dissemination or commercial use of personal information to the public and private sectors. Similar initiatives are under way in other countries in which we do business or from which we source data. The following legal and regulatory developments also could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows:
 
  •      amendment, enactment, or interpretation of laws and regulations which restrict the access and use of personal information and reduce the supply of data available to customers;
 
  •      changes in cultural and consumer attitudes to favor further restrictions on information collection and sharing, which may lead to regulations that prevent full utilization of our solutions;
 
  •      failure of our solutions to comply with current laws and regulations; and
 
  •      failure of our solutions to adapt to changes in the regulatory environment in an efficient, cost-effective manner.
 
Fraudulent data access and other security breaches may negatively impact our business and harm our reputation.
 
Security breaches in our facilities, computer networks, and databases may cause harm to our business and reputation and result in a loss of customers. Our systems may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, computer viruses, attacks by hackers and similar disruptive problems. Third-party contractors also may experience security breaches involving the storage and transmission of proprietary information. If users gain improper access to our databases, they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify confidential third-party information that is stored or transmitted on our networks.


12


Table of Contents

In addition, customers’ misuse of our information services could cause harm to our business and reputation and result in loss of customers. Any such misappropriation and/or misuse of our information could result in us, among other things, being in breach of certain data protection and related legislation.
 
A security or privacy breach may affect us in the following ways:
 
  •      deterring customers from using our solutions;
 
  •      deterring data suppliers from supplying data to us;
 
  •      harming our reputation;
 
  •      exposing us to liability;
 
  •      increasing operating expenses to correct problems caused by the breach;
 
  •      affecting our ability to meet customers’ expectations; or
 
  •      causing inquiry from governmental authorities.
 
We may detect incidents in which consumer data has been fraudulently or improperly acquired. The number of potentially affected consumers identified by any future incidents is obviously unknown. Any such incident could materially and adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
 
We typically face a long selling cycle to secure new contracts that requires significant resource commitments, which result in a long lead time before we receive revenues from new relationships.
 
We typically face a long selling cycle to secure a new contract and there is generally a long preparation period in order to commence providing the services. We typically incur significant business development expenses during the selling cycle and we may not succeed in winning a new customer’s business, in which case we receive no revenues and may receive no reimbursement for such expenses. Even if we succeed in developing a relationship with a potential new customer, we may not be successful in obtaining contractual commitments after the selling cycle or in maintaining contractual commitments after the implementation cycle, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We may lose key business assets, including loss of data center capacity or the interruption of telecommunications links, the internet, or power sources, which could significantly impede our ability to do business.
 
Our operations depend on our ability, as well as that of third-party service providers to whom we have outsourced several critical functions, to protect data centers and related technology against damage from hardware failure, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, impacts of terrorism, breaches in security (such as the actions of computer hackers), natural disasters, or other disasters. The on-line services we provide are dependent on links to telecommunications providers. In addition, we generate a significant amount of our revenues through telesales centers and websites that we utilize in the acquisition of new customers, fulfillment of solutions and services and responding to customer inquiries. We may not have sufficient redundant operations to cover a loss or failure in all of these areas in a timely manner. Certain of our customer contracts provide that our on-line servers may not be unavailable for specified periods of time. Any damage to our data centers, failure of our telecommunications links or inability to access these telesales centers or websites could cause interruptions in operations that materially adversely affect our ability to meet customers’ requirements, resulting in decreased revenue, operating income and earnings per share.
 
We are subject to significant competition in many of the markets in which we operate and we may not be able to compete effectively.
 
Some markets in which we operate or which we believe may provide growth opportunities for us are highly competitive, and are expected to remain highly competitive. We compete on the basis of quality,


13


Table of Contents

customer service, product and service selection and price. Our competitive position in various market segments depends upon the relative strength of competitors in the segment and the resources devoted to competing in that segment. Due to their size, certain competitors may be able to allocate greater resources to a particular market segment than we can. As a result, these competitors may be in a better position to anticipate and respond to changing customer preferences, emerging technologies and market trends. In addition, new competitors and alliances may emerge to take market share away. We may be unable to maintain our competitive position in our market segments, especially against larger competitors. We may also invest further to upgrade our systems in order to compete. If we fail to successfully compete, our business, financial position and results of operations may be adversely affected.
 
Acquisitions could result in operating difficulties, dilution and other harmful consequences.
 
Our long-term business strategy includes growth through acquisitions. Future acquisitions may not be completed on acceptable terms and acquired assets, data or businesses may not be successfully integrated into our operations. Any acquisitions or investments will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions of businesses. Such risks include, among other things:
 
  •      failing to implement or remediate controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a larger public company at acquired companies that prior to the acquisition lacked such controls, procedures and policies;
 
  •      paying more than fair market value for an acquired company or assets;
 
  •      failing to integrate the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses in an efficient, timely manner;
 
  •      assuming potential liabilities of an acquired company;
 
  •      managing the potential disruption to our ongoing business;
 
  •      distracting management focus from our core businesses;
 
  •      difficulty in acquiring suitable businesses;
 
  •      impairing relationships with employees, customers, and strategic partners;
 
  •      incurring expenses associated with the amortization of intangible assets;
 
  •      incurring expenses associated with an impairment of all or a portion of goodwill and other intangible assets due to changes in market conditions, weak economies in certain competitive markets, or the failure of certain acquisitions to realize expected benefits; and
 
  •      diluting the share value and voting power of existing stockholders.
 
The anticipated benefits of many of our acquisitions may not materialize. Future acquisitions or dispositions could result in the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could harm our financial condition. Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.
 
To the extent the availability of free or relatively inexpensive information increases, the demand for some of our solutions may decrease.
 
Public sources of free or relatively inexpensive information have become increasingly available recently, particularly through the internet, and this trend is expected to continue. Governmental agencies in particular have increased the amount of information to which they provide free public access. Public sources of free or relatively inexpensive information may reduce demand for our solutions. To the extent that customers choose not to obtain solutions from us and instead rely on information obtained at little or no cost from these public sources, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.


14


Table of Contents

Our senior leadership team is critical to our continued success and the loss of such personnel could harm our business.
 
Our future success substantially depends on the continued service and performance of the members of our senior leadership team. These personnel possess business and technical capabilities that are difficult to replace. Members of our senior management operating team have been with us for an average of almost twenty years. If we lose key members of our senior management operating team, we may not be able to effectively manage our current operations or meet ongoing and future business challenges, and this may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We may fail to attract and retain enough qualified employees to support our operations, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to expand our business and service our customers.
 
Our business relies on large numbers of skilled employees and our success depends on our ability to attract, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees. If our attrition rate increases, our operating efficiency and productivity may decrease. We compete for employees not only with other companies in our industry but also with companies in other industries, such as software services, engineering services and financial services companies, and there is a limited pool of employees who have the skills and training needed to do our work. If our business continues to grow, the number of people we will need to hire will increase. We will also need to increase our hiring if we are not able to maintain our attrition rate through our current recruiting and retention policies. Increased competition for employees could have an adverse effect on our ability to expand our business and service our customers, as well as cause us to incur greater personnel expenses and training costs.
 
We are subject to antitrust and other litigation, and may in the future become subject to further such litigation; an adverse outcome in such litigation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, revenues and profitability.
 
We participate in businesses (particularly insurance-related businesses and services) that are subject to substantial litigation, including antitrust litigation. We are subject to the provisions of a 1995 settlement agreement in an antitrust lawsuit brought by various state Attorneys General and private plaintiffs which imposes certain constraints with respect to insurer involvement in our governance and business. We currently are defending against several putative class action lawsuits in which it is alleged that certain of our subsidiaries unlawfully have conspired with insurers with respect to their payment of insurance claims. See “Business — Legal Proceedings.” Our failure to successfully defend or settle such litigation could result in liability that, to the extent not covered by our insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, revenues and profitability. Given the nature of our business, we may be subject to similar litigation in the future. Even if the direct financial impact of such litigation is not material, settlements or judgments arising out of such litigation could include further restrictions on our ability to conduct business, including potentially the elimination of entire lines of business, which could increase our cost of doing business and limit our prospects for future growth.
 
General economic, political and market forces and dislocations beyond our control could reduce demand for our solutions and harm our business.
 
The demand for our solutions may be impacted by domestic and international factors that are beyond our control, including macroeconomic, political and market conditions, the availability of short-term and long-term funding and capital, the level and volatility of interest rates, currency exchange rates and inflation. The United States economy is currently undergoing a period of slowdown, which some observers view as a possible recession and both the future domestic and global economic environments may continue to be less favorable than those of recent years. Any one or more of these factors may contribute to reduced activity and prices in the securities markets generally and could result in a reduction in demand for our solutions, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition.


15


Table of Contents

The current global dislocation of the credit markets, which have significantly contributed to the slowdown described above, has not yet been fully accounted for by many financial institutions. A significant additional decline in the value of assets for which risk is transferred in market transactions could have an adverse impact on the demand for our solutions. In addition, the decline of the credit markets has reduced the number of mortgage originators, and therefore, the immediate demand for our related mortgage solutions. Specifically, certain of our fraud detection and prevention solutions are directed at the mortgage market. This decline in asset value and originations and an increase in foreclosure levels has also created greater regulatory scrutiny of mortgage originations and securitization. Any new regulatory regime may change the utility of our solutions for mortgage lenders and other participants in the mortgage lending industry and related derivative markets or increase our costs as we adapt our solutions to new regulation.
 
Risks Related to the Offering
 
There is no prior public market for our common stock and therefore an active trading market or any specific price for our common stock may not be established.
 
Currently, there is no public trading market for our common stock. We expect that our Class A common stock will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “     .” The initial public offering price per share was determined by agreement among us, the selling stockholders and the representatives of the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price of our common stock after our initial public offering. An active trading market for our common stock may not develop and continue upon the completion of this offering and the market price of our common stock may decline below the initial public offering price.
 
The market price for our common stock may be volatile.
 
The market price for our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors including the following:
 
  •      actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;
 
  •      changes in financial estimates by securities research analysts;
 
  •      changes in the economic performance or market valuations of other companies engaged in our industry;
 
  •      regulatory developments in our industry affecting us, our customers or our competitors;
 
  •      announcements of technological developments;
 
  •      sales or expected sales of additional common stock;
 
  •      continued dislocations and downward pressure in the capital markets; and
 
  •      terrorist attacks or natural disasters or other such events impacting countries where we or our customers have operations.
 
In addition, securities markets generally and from time to time experience significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
 
We plan to issue a number of options to purchase Class A common stock to our directors and employees that could dilute your interest in us.
 
Upon the closing of this offering we will have           shares of Class A common stock available for issuance to our directors, executive officers and employees in connection with grants of options to purchase Class A common stock under our employee benefits arrangements. Issuances of Class A common stock to our directors, executive officers and employees pursuant to the exercise of stock options under our employee benefits arrangements will dilute your interest in us.


16


Table of Contents

If there are substantial sales of our common stock, our stock price could decline.
 
The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of common stock in the market after this offering or the perception that these sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem attractive. Upon consummation of this offering, we will have           shares of common stock outstanding. Of these shares, the           shares of common stock offered hereby will be freely tradable without restriction in the public market, unless purchased by our affiliates.
 
Following this offering, our existing stockholders will beneficially own in the aggregate approximately           shares of our Class A common stock and           shares of our Class B common stock, representing in aggregate approximately     % of our outstanding common stock. Such stockholders will be able to sell their common stock in the public market from time to time without registering them, subject to the lock-up periods described below, and subject to limitations on the timing, amount and method of those sales imposed by securities laws. If any of these stockholders were to sell a large number of their common stock, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly. In addition, the perception in the public markets that sales by them might occur could also adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
 
In connection with this offering, we, our selling stockholders, our directors and certain members of our management have each agreed to enter into a lock-up agreement and thereby be subject to a lock-up period, meaning that they and their permitted transferees will not be permitted to sell any of their common stock without the prior consent of the underwriters for 180 days after the date of this prospectus. Although we have been advised that there is no present intention to do so, the underwriters may, in their sole discretion and without notice, release all or any portion of the common stock from the restrictions in any of the lock-up agreements described above. In addition, certain members of our management will be subject to a lock-up agreements with us whereby they will not be permitted to sell any of their common stock, subject to certain conditions, for a period of time after the pricing of this initial public offering. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Letter Agreements.”
 
Also, pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our Class B stockholders will not be able to sell any of their common stock, subject to certain conditions, to the public for a period of time after the pricing of this initial public offering. Each share of Class B (Series 1) common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the holder, into one share of Class A common stock 18 months after the date of this prospectus. Each share of Class B (Series 2) common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the holder, into one share of Class A common stock 30 months after the date of this prospectus. Our board of directors may approve exceptions to the limitation on transfers of our Class B common stock in their sole discretion, in connection with the sale of such Class B common stock in a public offering registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in such other limited circumstances as our board of directors may determine. Any Class B common stock sold to the public will first be converted to Class A common stock. Such further resale of our common stock could cause the price of our common stock to decline. See “Description of Capital Stock — Common Stock — Conversion.”
 
Pursuant to our equity incentive plans, options to purchase approximately           shares of Class A common stock will be outstanding upon consummation of this offering. Following this offering, we intend to file a registration statement under the Securities Act registering a total of approximately           shares of Class A common stock which will cover the shares available for issuance under our equity incentive plans (including for such outstanding options) as well as shares held for resale by our existing stockholders that were previously issued under our equity incentive plans. Such further issuance and resale of our common stock could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
 
Also, in the future, we may issue our securities in connection with investments and acquisitions. The amount of our common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition could constitute a material portion of our then outstanding common stock.


17


Table of Contents

The holders of our Class B common stock have the right to elect up to three of our directors and their interests in our business may be different than yours.
 
Until no Class B common stock remains outstanding, the holders of our Class B common stock will have the right to elect up to three of our directors. Stockholders of the Class B common stock may not have the same incentive to approve a corporate action that may be favorable for the holders of Class A common stock, or their interests may otherwise conflict with yours. For example, holders of our Class B common stock may seek to cause us to take courses of action that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment in us and the use of our solutions, but which might involve risks to holders of our Class A common stock. See “Description of Capital Stock — Common Stock — Voting Rights.”
 
Following this offering, changes in our capital structure and level of indebtedness and the terms of anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law and in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws could diminish the value of our common stock and could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest difficult or could impede an attempt to replace or remove our directors.
 
We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may consider favorable or make it more difficult for stockholders to replace directors even if stockholders consider it beneficial to do so. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws:
 
  •      authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares to thwart a takeover attempt;
 
  •      prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow holders of less than a majority of the stock to elect some directors;
 
  •      require that vacancies on the board of directors, including newly-created directorships, be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office;
 
  •      limit who may call special meetings of stockholders;
 
  •      authorize the issuance of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock without stockholder approval, subject to the rules and regulations of the          ;
 
  •      prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders; and
 
  •      establish advance notice requirements for nominating candidates for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
 
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may inhibit potential acquisition bids for us. Upon completion of this offering, we will be subject to Section 203, which regulates corporate acquisitions and limits the ability of a holder of 15% or more of our stock from acquiring the rest of our stock. Under Delaware law a corporation may opt out of the anti-takeover provisions, but we do not intend to do so.
 
These provisions may prevent a stockholder from receiving the benefit from any premium over the market price of our common stock offered by a bidder in a potential takeover. Even in the absence of an attempt to effect a change in management or a takeover attempt, these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if they are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.


18


Table of Contents

 
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.
 
As a privately held company, we have not been responsible for the corporate governance and financial reporting practices and policies required of a public company. Following the completion of this offering, we will be a publicly traded company. Once we become a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses that we do not currently incur. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the applicable listing rules and rules implemented by the applicable foreign regulatory agencies, may require changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect such rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly.


19


Table of Contents

 
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
We have made statements under the captions “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business” and in other sections of this prospectus that are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, may include projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed under the caption entitled “Risk Factors.” You should specifically consider the numerous risks outlined under “Risk Factors.”
 
Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus to conform our prior statements to actual results or revised expectations.
 
MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA AND FORECASTS
 
Market data and certain industry data and forecasts used throughout this prospectus were obtained from internal company surveys, market research, consultant surveys, publicly available information, reports of governmental agencies and industry publications and surveys. We believe the data from third-party sources to be reliable based upon our management’s knowledge of the industry, but have not independently verified such data. Our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this prospectus.


20


Table of Contents

 
THE REORGANIZATION
 
On May 23, 2008, in contemplation of our initial public offering, we formed Verisk Analytics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, to be the new holding company for our business. It was initially formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Insurance Services Office, Inc. Prior to the completion of this offering, we will have effected an internal reorganization whereby ISO will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Verisk and all outstanding shares of ISO common stock will be replaced with common stock of Verisk.
 
This transaction will occur by the stockholders of ISO exchanging their common stock in ISO for common stock in Verisk. As part of this reorganization, our existing equity based compensation plans will be assigned to Verisk. As a result, all outstanding options issued under our existing equity based compensation plans will become options to acquire common stock of Verisk.
 
Immediately after the reorganization we will effect an approximately  -for-one split of our common stock in order to have a price per share equal to the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.


21


Table of Contents

 
USE OF PROCEEDS
 
The selling stockholders are selling all of the shares of common stock in this offering and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares.
 
DIVIDEND POLICY
 
Following this offering and subject to legally available funds, we currently intend to pay a quarterly dividend, in cash, at an annual rate initially equal to $      per share of Class A common stock (representing a quarterly rate initially equal to $      per share) commencing with the quarter ended          , 2008. Our Class B common stock will share ratably on an as-converted basis in such dividends. The declaration and payment of any dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, covenants in our debt instruments, and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant.


22


Table of Contents

 
CAPITALIZATION
 
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of June 30, 2008:
 
  •      on an actual basis; and
 
  •      on an as adjusted basis to give effect to changes in the terms of our capital stock in connection with this initial public offering and the consequent expiration of our obligations to redeem our Class A common stock.
 
This table should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
                 
    As of June 30, 2008  
    Actual     As Adjusted  
    (in thousands,
 
    except share numbers)  
 
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)
  $ 642,182     $ 642,182  
                 
Redeemable common stock:(1)
               
Class A redeemable common stock, stated at redemption value, $0.01 par value; 6,700,000 shares authorized; 2,999,939 shares issued and 946,518 outstanding
    1,058,631        
Unearned Class A common stock ESOP shares
    (3,751 )      
Notes receivable from stockholders(2)
    (48,593 )      
                 
Total redeemable common stock
    1,006,287        
                 
Stockholders’ deficit:
               
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized; 10,004,500 shares issued and 2,863,742 shares outstanding(3)
          30  
Class B (Series 1 and 2) common stock, $0.001 par value per share,           shares authorized,           shares issued and           shares outstanding(3)
    100       100  
Additional paid-in capital
          1,058,601  
Class A common stock unearned ESOP shares
          (3,751 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (29,915 )     (29,915 )
(Accumulated deficit)/retained earnings
    (465,138 )     (465,138 )
Class A common stock, treasury stock, 2,053,421 shares
           
Class B common stock, treasury stock, 7,140,758 shares
    (683,994 )     (683,994 )
                 
Total stockholders’ deficit
    (1,178,947 )     (124,067 )
                 
Total capitalization
  $ 469,522     $ 518,115  
                 
 
 
(1) Prior to this offering, we were required to record our Class A common stock and vested options at redemption value at each balance sheet date as the redemption of these securities is not solely within our control, due to our contractual obligations to redeem these shares. We classify this redemption value as redeemable common stock. Subsequent to this offering, we will no longer be obligated to redeem these shares and therefore we will not be required to record any redeemable common stock.
 
(2) Prior to the filing of this prospectus, we provided full recourse loans to directors and senior management in connection with exercising their stock options. The loan program has been terminated and all of these loans have been repaid.
 
(3) Giving effect to the approximately    -for-one stock split that will have occurred prior to the completion of this offering.


23


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
 
The following selected historical financial data should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 are derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The condensed consolidated statement of operations data for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 and the condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2008 are derived from unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that are included in this prospectus and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2007 are derived from unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, in our opinion, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations and financial position. Results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 or any future period.
 
Since January 1, 2003 we have acquired 14 businesses, which may affect the comparability of our financial statements.
 
                                                         
          Six Months
 
    Year Ended December 31,     Ended June 30,  
    2003     2004     2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data)  
 
Statement of income data:
                                                       
Revenues:
                                                       
Risk Assessment revenues
  $ 359,186     $ 403,616     $ 448,875     $ 472,634     $ 485,160     $ 244,556     $ 253,356  
Decision Analytics revenues
    118,897       144,711       196,785       257,499       317,035       155,432       184,334  
                                                         
Revenues
    478,083       548,327       645,660       730,133       802,195       399,988       437,690  
                                                         
Expenses:
                                                       
Cost of revenues
    256,917       263,332       294,911       331,804       357,191       176,502       190,678  
Selling, general and administrative
    75,075       81,020       88,723       100,124       107,576       55,600       59,028  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    20,261       19,569       22,024       28,007       31,745       15,498       16,424  
Amortization of intangible assets
    9,927       11,412       19,800       26,854       33,916       17,240       14,937  
                                                         
Total expenses
    362,180       375,333       425,458       486,789       530,428       264,840       281,067  
                                                         
Operating income
    115,903       172,994       220,202       243,344       271,767       135,148       156,623  
Other income/(expense):
                                                       
Investment income and realized gains on securities, net
    3,789       950       2,932       6,101       9,308       4,963       317  
Interest expense
    (2,333 )     (5,241 )     (10,465 )     (16,668 )     (22,928 )     (11,474 )     (14,173 )
                                                         
Total other expense, net
    1,456       (4,291 )     (7,533 )     (10,567 )     (13,620 )     (6,511 )     (13,856 )
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    117,359       168,703       212,669       232,777       258,147       128,637       142,767  
Provision for income taxes
    (47,745 )     (68,925 )     (85,722 )     (86,921 )     (103,184 )     (52,432 )     (61,818 )
                                                         
Income from continuing operations
    69,614       99,778       126,947       145,856       154,963       76,205       80,949  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(1)
    (12 )     (508 )     (2,574 )     (1,805 )     (4,589 )     (1,302 )      
                                                         
Net income
  $ 69,602     $ 99,270     $ 124,373     $ 144,051     $ 150,374     $ 74,903     $ 80,949  
                                                         


24


Table of Contents

                                                         
          Six Months
 
    Year Ended December 31,     Ended June 30,  
    2003     2004     2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data)  
 
Basic income/(loss) per share (2) :
                                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 10.91     $ 20.12     $ 29.81     $ 35.31     $ 38.58     $ 18.69     $ 21.73  
Loss from discontinued operations
          (0.10 )     (0.61 )     (0.44 )     (1.14 )     (0.32 )      
                                                         
Net income per share
  $ 10.91     $ 20.02     $ 29.20     $ 34.87     $ 37.44     $ 18.37     $ 21.73  
                                                         
Diluted income/(loss) per share:
                                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 10.62     $ 19.28     $ 28.45     $ 33.85     $ 37.03     $ 17.97     $ 20.87  
Loss from discontinued operations
          (0.10 )     (0.58 )     (0.42 )     (1.10 )     (0.31 )      
                                                         
Net income per share
  $ 10.62     $ 19.18     $ 27.87     $ 33.43     $ 35.93     $ 17.66     $ 20.87  
                                                         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                                                       
Basic
    6,382,836       4,958,161       4,258,989       4,130,962       4,016,928       4,077,259       3,724,876  
                                                         
Diluted
    6,557,950       5,174,281       4,462,109       4,308,976       4,185,151       4,240,053       3,877,906  
                                                         
Other data:
                                                       
Purchases of fixed assets
  $ (14,385 )   $ (17,516 )   $ (24,019 )   $ (25,742 )   $ (32,941 )   $ (23,050 )   $ (17,810 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    131,340       174,780       174,071       223,499       248,521       117,136       141,929  
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    19,731       (41,851 )     (107,444 )     (243,452 )     (110,831 )     (49,403 )     (98,402 )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (150,912 )     (114,280 )     (90,954 )     75,907       (212,591 )     (127,194 )     (16,759 )
 
                                                         
    Year Ended December 31,     As of June 30,  
    2003     2004     2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Balance Sheet Data:
                                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 48,954     $ 67,700     $ 42,822     $ 99,152     $ 24,049     $ 39,826     $ 50,835  
Total assets
    344,145       386,496       466,244       744,731       828,483       779,465       866,839  
Total debt(3)
    112,880       206,152       276,964       448,698       438,330       401,700       642,182  
Redeemable common stock(4)
    380,246       722,532       901,089       1,125,933       1,171,188       1,211,422       1,006,287  
Stockholders’ deficit
    (316,369 )     (737,929 )     (938,294 )     (1,116,357 )     (1,195,728 )     (1,203,279 )     (1,178,947 )
 
(1) As of December 31, 2007, we discontinued operations of our claim consulting business located in New Hope, Pennsylvania and the United Kingdom.
 
(2) In conjunction with the initial public offering, the stock of Insurance Services Office, Inc. will convert to stock of Verisk Analytics, Inc., which plans to effect a stock split of its common stock. Giving effect to the approximately          -for-one stock split that will have occurred prior to the completion of this offering, basic earnings per share from continuing operations and discontinued operations would have been $      and $     , $      and $     , $      and $     , $      and $     , and $      and $      for each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $      and $      and $      and $      for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Diluted earnings per shares from continuing operations and discontinued operations would have been $      and $     , $      and $     , and $      and $      for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $      and $      and $      and $      for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
 
(3) Includes capital lease obligations.
 
(4) Prior to this offering, we are required to record our Class A common stock and vested options at redemption value at each balance sheet date as the redemption of these securities is not solely within our control, due to our contractual obligations to redeem these shares. We classify this redemption value as redeemable common stock. Subsequent to this offering, we will no longer be obligated to redeem these shares and therefore we will not be required to record any redeemable common stock.

25


Table of Contents

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as the discussion under “Selected Consolidated Financial Data.” This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in or implied by any of the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those listed under “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
 
We enable risk-bearing businesses to better understand and manage their risks. We provide value to our customers by supplying proprietary data that, combined with our analytic methods, creates embedded decision support solutions. We are the largest aggregator and provider of data pertaining to U.S. property and casualty, or P&C, insurance risks. We offer solutions for detecting fraud in the U.S. P&C insurance, mortgage and healthcare industries and sophisticated methods to predict and quantify loss in diverse contexts ranging from natural catastrophes to health insurance.
 
Our customers use our solutions to make better risk decisions with greater efficiency and discipline. We refer to these products and services as ‘solutions’ due to the integration among our products and the flexibility that enables our customers to purchase components or the comprehensive package of products. These solutions take various forms, including data, statistical models or tailored analytics, all designed to allow our clients to make more logical decisions. We believe our solutions for analyzing risk positively impact our customers’ revenues and help them better manage their costs.
 
We organize our business in two segments: Risk Assessment and Decision Analytics. Our Risk Assessment segment provides statistical, actuarial and underwriting data for the U.S. P&C insurance industry. Our Risk Assessment segment revenues represented approximately 60% and 58% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Our Decision Analytics segment provides solutions our customers use to analyze the four processes of the Verisk Risk Analysis Framework: Prediction of Loss, Selection and Pricing of Risk, Detection and Prevention of Fraud, and Quantification of Loss. Our Decision Analytics segment revenues represented approximately 40% and 42% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
 
Executive Summary
 
Key Business Characteristics
 
We believe we have an attractive operating model due to the recurring nature of our revenues, the scalability of our solutions and the low capital intensity of our business.
 
Recurring Nature of Revenues.   We offer our solutions primarily through annual subscriptions or long-term agreements, which are generally pre-paid. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, 74% and 72% of our revenues, respectively, were derived from subscriptions and long-term agreements for our solutions. Approximately 96% of our top 200 customers in 2007, as ranked by revenues, have been our customers for each of the last five years. The combination of our historically high renewal rates, which we believe are due to the embedded nature of our solutions, and our subscription-based revenue model, results in predictable cash flows.
 
Scalable Solutions.   Our technology infrastructure and scalable solution platforms allow us to accommodate significant additional transaction volumes with limited incremental costs. This operating leverage enabled us to increase our EBITDA margins from 30.6% in 2003 to 42.1% in 2007.
 
Low Capital Intensity.   We have low capital needs that allow us to generate strong cash flow. In 2007, our operating income and capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue were 33.9% and 4.1%, respectively.


26


Table of Contents

Revenues
 
We earn revenues through subscriptions, long-term agreements and on a transactional basis. Subscriptions for our solutions are generally paid in advance of rendering services either quarterly or in full upon commencement of the subscription period, which is usually for one year and are automatically renewed each year. As a result, the timing of our cash flows generally precedes our recognition of revenues and income and our cash flow from operations tends to be higher in the first quarter as we receive subscription payments. Examples of these arrangements include subscriptions that allow our customers to access our standardized coverage language or our actuarial services throughout the subscription period. In general, we experience minimal seasonality within the business. Our long-term agreements are generally for periods of three to seven years. We recognize revenue from subscriptions ratably over the term of the subscription and most long-term agreements are recognized ratably over the term of the agreement.
 
Certain of our solutions are also paid for by our customers on a transactional basis. For example, we have solutions that allow our customers to access fraud detection tools in the context of an individual mortgage application, obtain property-specific rating and underwriting information to price a policy on a commercial building, or compare a P&C insurance, medical or workers’ compensation claim with information in our databases. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, 26% and 28% of our revenues, respectively, were derived from providing transactional solutions. We earn transactional revenues as our solutions are delivered or services performed. In general, transactions are billed monthly at the end of each month.
 
More than 80% and 81% of the revenues in our Risk Assessment segment for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, were derived from subscriptions and long-term agreements for our solutions. Our customers in this segment include most of the P&C insurance providers in the United States and we have retained approximately 99% of our P&C insurance customer base in each of the last five years. More than 63% and 59% of the revenues in our Decision Analytics segment, for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, were derived from subscriptions and long-term agreements for our solutions.
 
Principal Operating Costs and Expenses
 
Personnel expenses are the major component of both our cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses. Personnel expenses include salaries, benefits, incentive compensation, equity compensation costs (described under “— Equity Compensation Costs” below), sales commissions, employment taxes, recruiting costs and outsourced temporary agency costs and represented 66% of our total expenses for each of the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008.
 
We allocate personnel expenses between two categories, cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative costs based on the actual costs associated with each employee. We categorize employees who maintain our solutions as cost of revenues, and all other personnel, including executive managers, sales people, marketing, business development, finance, legal, human resources and administrative services as selling, general and administrative expenses. A significant portion of our other operating costs, such as facilities and communications, are also either captured within cost of revenues or selling, general and administrative expense, based on the nature of the work being performed.
 
While we expect to grow our headcount over time to take advantage of our market opportunities, we believe that the economies of scale in our operating model will allow us to grow our personnel expenses at a lower rate than revenues. Historically, our EBITDA margin has improved because we have been able to increase revenues without a proportionate corresponding increase in expenses.
 
Cost of Revenues.   Our cost of revenues consists primarily of personnel expenses. Cost of revenues also includes the expenses associated with the acquisition and verification of data, the maintenance of our existing solutions and the development and enhancement of our next-generation solutions. Within our Risk Assessment segment, much of our revenues are based on the data we receive from our customers. The costs for such revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008 were


27


Table of Contents

$15.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively, and have declined as a percentage of revenue from 3.7% to 3.1% of our Risk Assessment segment revenues from December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2008.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expense.   Our selling, general and administrative expense also consists primarily of personnel costs. A portion of the other operating costs such as facilities, insurance and communications are also allocated to selling, general and administrative costs based on the nature of the work being performed by the employee.
 
Description of Acquisitions
 
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to continue to selectively acquire companies primarily to augment our Decision Analytics offerings. We have acquired ten businesses since January 2005, all of which are included in our Decision Analytics segment. Specifically, seven of these companies provide fraud identification and detection solutions and two of these companies provide loss prediction and selection solutions to the healthcare market. In addition, we acquired Xactware, Inc., or Xactware, in 2006, which provides loss quantification solutions for all phases of building repair and reconstruction. As a result of these acquisitions, our consolidated results of operations may not be comparable between periods.
 
In 2007, we acquired three companies for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $50.0 million and funded indemnity and contingent payment escrows of $3.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively. In 2006, we acquired four companies for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $202.1 million, of which $188.0 million relates to Xactware, and funded indemnity and contingent payment escrows of $11.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively. In 2005, we acquired three companies for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $62.7 million and funded contingency escrows of $14.4 million.
 
At June 30, 2008, the current and long-term portions of these escrows were $12.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively. A portion of these escrows and other potential acquisition contingent payments are linked to performance targets and, in some cases, to continued employment of key principals. When tied to continued employment, these contingent payments must be expensed as compensation. Compensation expense related to these acquisition contingent payments for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $9.7 million, $9.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 were $2.4 million and $0.6 million.
 
Equity Compensation Costs
 
We established a leveraged employee stock ownership plan, or ESOP, funded with intercompany debt that includes 401(k), ESOP and profit sharing components to provide employees with equity participation. We make quarterly cash contributions to the plan equal to the debt service requirements. As the debt is repaid, shares are released to the ESOP to fund 401(k) matching and profit sharing contributions and the remainder is allocated annually to active employees in proportion to their eligible compensation in relation to total participant eligible compensation.


28


Table of Contents

 
We accrue compensation expense ratably over the reporting period equal to the fair value of the shares to be released to the ESOP. As the value of our shares has increased, our compensation expense relating to our ESOP has increased as well. The amount of our equity compensation costs recognized for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 are as follows:
 
                                         
          Six Months
 
    Year Ended December 31,     Ended June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (in thousands)  
 
401(k) matching contribution expense:
                                       
Risk Assessment
  $ 4,466     $ 4,703     $ 4,914     $ 2,501     $ 2,660  
Decision Analytics
    1,689       2,105       2,788       1,385       1,542  
                                         
Total 401(k) matching contribution expense
    6,155       6,808       7,702       3,886       4,202  
                                         
Profit sharing contribution expenses:
                                       
Risk Assessment
                473       239       370  
Decision Analytics
                268       132       215  
                                         
Total profit sharing contribution expense
                741       371       585  
                                         
ESOP allocation expense:
                                       
Risk Assessment
    5,422       8,105       8,806       4,224       4,289  
Decision Analytics
    2,051       3,627       4,997       2,340       2,488  
                                         
Total ESOP allocation expense
    7,473       11,732       13,803       6,564       6,777  
                                         
Total ESOP costs
  $ 13,628     $ 18,540     $ 22,246     $ 10,821     $ 11,564  
                                         
 
Prior to the completion of this offering, we intend to accelerate the allocation of a portion of the shares to the ESOP, which will result in a non-recurring non-cash charge of approximately $      million, based on the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. As a result, subsequent to the offering, the non-cash ESOP allocation expense will be substantially reduced. Non-cash charges relating specifically to our 401(k) and profit sharing were $6.8 million and $8.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and we expect this level of charges to continue to grow in the future.
 
In addition, the portion of the ESOP allocation expense related to the appreciation of the value of the shares in the ESOP above the value of those shares when the ESOP was first established is not tax deductible. Therefore, we believe the accelerated allocation will result in a reduction of approximately 3% to our effective tax rate from 2008 to 2009.
 
On January 1, 2005, we adopted FAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” or FAS No. 123(R), using a prospective approach, which required us to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption. Therefore, since January 1, 2005 the expense associated with the number of options granted has increased every year. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2005 we expensed the option grants vested in 2005, but for the year ended December 31, 2006 we expensed the option grants vested in 2005 and 2006. See “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Stock Based Compensation.”
 
Public Company Expenses
 
Beginning in 2008, our selling, general and administrative costs increased as we prepared for this initial public offering; for the six months ended June 30, 2008, such costs were $2.3 million. Following the offering, we will incur additional selling, general and administrative expenses related to operating as a public company, such as increased legal and accounting expenses, the cost of an investor relations function, costs related to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and increased director and officer insurance premiums.


29


Table of Contents

Upon the completion of this offering, we expect to grant           shares of our Class A common stock to our directors, officers and employees in the form of stock options, performance shares, performance unit awards, restricted shares or restricted stock awards. Assuming that all of the performance measures are met, we expect the related expense to be approximately $      million, $      million and $      million for 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. See “Management — Executive Compensation — Verisk Analytics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.”
 
Trends Affecting Our Business
 
A portion of our revenues are related to changes in historical insurance premiums, therefore, our revenues could be positively or negatively affected by growth or declines in premiums for the lines of insurance for which we perform services. The pricing of these solutions is based on an individual customer’s premiums in a prior period, so the pricing is fixed at the inception of each calendar year. The impact of insurance premiums has a more significant impact on the Risk Assessment segment than the Decision Analytics segment. Since 2005, premium growth in the P&C insurance industry has slowed and we expect little or no growth for most insurance lines during 2008. In addition, since 2007, the softening of the automobile insurance market negatively impacted our auto premium leakage identification solutions. We do not expect this trend to have a material impact on our liquidity or capital resources.
 
A portion of our revenues in the Decision Analytics segment are tied to the volume of applications for new mortgages or refinancing of existing mortgages. Turmoil in the mortgage market over the past year has adversely affected revenue in this segment of our business. Although we expect this trend to continue to impact our business during the balance of 2008, due to the rise in foreclosure and early pay defaults, we have seen and expect to see in the future an increase in revenues from our solutions that help our customers focus on improved underwriting quality of mortgage loans, ensure the application data is accurate and identify and rapidly settle bad loans which may have been originated based upon fraudulent information.
 
Recent events within the United States economy are expected to result in a further tightening in credit availability, which has resulted in higher interest rates. To date we have been able to adequately secure credit arrangements for the financing of the business and we will continue to explore financing alternatives to fund future growth opportunities. Borrowings under our debt facilities are long-term in nature and are at fixed interest rates. While the potential for higher interest rates may translate into higher interest expense in the future, we do not expect this to have a material impact on our business in the near-term.
 
Results of Operations
 
Set forth below is our results of operations expressed as a percentage of revenues.
 


30


Table of Contents

                                         
          Six Months
 
          Ended
 
    Year Ended December 31,     June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
 
Statement of income data:
                                       
Expenses:
                                       
Cost of revenues
    45.7 %     45.4 %     44.5 %     44.1 %     43.6 %
Selling, general and administrative
    13.7 %     13.7 %     13.4 %     13.9 %     13.5 %
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    3.4 %     3.8 %     4.0 %     3.9 %     3.8 %
Amortization of intangible assets
    3.1 %     3.7 %     4.2 %     4.3 %     3.4 %
                                         
Total expenses
    65.9 %     66.7 %     66.1 %     66.2 %     64.2 %
                                         
Operating income
    34.1 %     33.3 %     33.9 %     33.8 %     35.8 %
Other income/(expense):
                                       
Interest and investment income (loss)
    0.5 %     0.8 %     1.2 %     1.2 %     0.1 %
Interest expense
    (1.6 )%     (2.3 )%     (2.9 )%     (2.9 )%     (3.2 )%
                                         
Total other income/(expense)
    (1.2 )%     (1.4 )%     (1.7 )%     (1.6 )%     (3.2 )%
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    32.9 %     31.9 %     32.2 %     32.2 %     32.6 %
Provision for income taxes
    (13.3 )%     (11.9 )%     (12.9 )%     (13.1 )%     (14.1 )%
                                         
Income from continuing operations
    19.7 %     20.0 %     19.3 %     19.1 %     18.5 %
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (0.4 )%     (0.2 )%     (0.6 )%     (0.3 )%     (— )
                                         
Net Income
    19.3 %     19.7 %     18.7 %     18.7 %     18.5 %
                                         
EBITDA
    40.6 %     40.8 %     42.1 %     42.0 %     42.9 %
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
 
Consolidated Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues were $437.7 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $400.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $37.7 million or 9.4%. During the latter part of 2007, we acquired three companies that accounted for $15.8 million of additional revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. Excluding these acquisitions, revenues increased $21.9 million, which included an increase of $8.8 million in our Risk Assessment segment and an increase of $13.1 million in our Decision Analytics segment.
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues was $190.7 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $176.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $14.2 million, or 8.0%. The increase was primarily due to $10.0 million in costs attributable to the newly acquired companies and $4.2 million in costs due to increased salaries and employee benefits costs, which include annual salary increases, medical costs and long-term incentive plans across a relatively constant employee headcount, a $1.5 million increase in office maintenance fees and other operating expenses of $1.7 million. These increases were partially offset by $1.4 million in loss on disposal of assets in the period ended June 30, 2007 with no corresponding amount in the current period and acquisition contingent payments that were lower by $1.9 million compared to the period ended June 30, 2007. These acquisition contingent payments are related to achievement of performance-related targets for different acquisitions in the periods described. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues was 44.1% and 43.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

31


Table of Contents

 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $59.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $55.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $3.4 million or 6.2%. The increase was due to $0.6 million in costs attributable to the newly acquired companies, $1.9 million in costs due to increased salaries and employee benefits costs, which include annual salary increases, medical costs and long-term incentive plans across a relatively constant employee headcount, and $2.4 million in legal costs primarily resulting from the preparation for our initial public offering. This increase was partially offset by lower advertising and marketing costs of $0.6 million, and other general expenses of $0.9 million. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 13.5% from 13.9%.
 
Depreciation and Amortization of Fixed Assets
 
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets were $16.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $15.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $0.9 million or 6.0%. Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets includes depreciation of furniture and equipment, software, computer hardware and related equipment. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization of fixed assets decreased to 3.8% from 3.9%.
 
Amortization of Intangible Assets
 
Amortization of intangible assets was $14.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $17.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, a decrease of $2.3 million, or 13.4%. The decrease is the result of certain intangible assets having been fully amortized in 2007, partially offset by the increased amortization of intangibles that resulted from our new acquisitions. We amortize intangible assets obtained through acquisitions over the periods that we expect to derive benefit from such assets.
 
Investment Income and Realized Gains (Losses) on Securities, Net
 
Investment income and realized gains (losses) on securities, net was $0.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $5.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, a decrease of $4.7 million. Interest income and realized gains (losses) on securities, consists of interest income we receive from our cash and cash equivalents and stockholder loans, dividend income from our available-for-sale securities held with certain financial institutions as well as realized amounts associated with the sale of available-for-sale securities. The decrease primarily resulted from reduced interest income of $2.8 million coupled with the loss on sale of securities of $1.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense was $14.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $11.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $2.7 million or 23.5%. This increase is primarily due to greater debt outstanding and higher interest rates in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2007.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
Provision for income taxes was $61.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $52.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $9.4 million or 17.9%. The effective tax rate was 43.3% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to 40.8% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007. The 2008 rate is higher due to an increase in ESOP appreciation expenses not deductible for tax purposes and a higher state tax rate in 2008. Subsequent interim periods in 2008 should reflect lower effective tax rates as a result of the reduction of state tax contingencies due to the expiration of related statutes of limitations.


32


Table of Contents

 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax was $1.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, resulting from costs to support customer contracts in our claim consulting business that was terminated in 2007. This business will not have an impact on our 2008 results.
 
Risk Assessment Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues for our Risk Assessment segment were $253.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $244.6 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $8.8 million or 3.6%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the sales of our industry-standard insurance programs partially offset by decreases in rate making and policy administration solutions and sales of our auto premium leakage identification solutions due to a softening in the auto insurance market. The increase in our industry-standard insurance programs primarily results from an increase in prices derived from continued enhancements to the content of our solutions and to a lesser extent, changes in our customer’s premium volumes. Our revenue by category for the periods presented is set forth below:
 
                         
    Six Months Ended
   
    June 30,   Percentage
    2007   2008   Change
    (In thousands)    
 
Industry standard insurance programs
  $ 157,045     $ 165,719       5.5 %
Property-specific rating and underwriting information
    63,786       63,344       −0.7 %
Statistical agency and data services
    13,643       13,820       1.3 %
Actuarial services
    10,082       10,473       3.9 %
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues for our Risk Assessment segment was $103.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $104.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, a decrease of $1.8 million or 1.7%. The decrease was due primarily to a $1.3 million loss on disposal of assets in the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, and an overall reduction of other operating expenses of $0.5 million which includes a reduction in salaries and employee benefits. As a percentage of Risk Assessment revenues, cost of revenues decreased to 40.7% from 42.9%.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses for our Risk Assessment segment were $36.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $34.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, a increase of $1.9 million or 5.4%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in legal fees associated with the preparation for our initial public offering. As a percentage of Risk Assessment revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 14.5% from 14.2%.
 
EBITDA Margin
 
The EBITDA margin for our Risk Assessment segment was 44.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 42.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
 
Decision Analytics Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues for our Decision Analytics segment were $184.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $155.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $28.9 million or 18.6%. During the latter part of 2007, we acquired three companies that accounted for $15.8 million of the additional revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. Excluding the impact


33


Table of Contents

of these acquisitions, revenues increased $13.1 million, primarily due to an increase in sales of our loss quantification and loss prediction solutions, which was partially offset by a decrease in our fraud identification and detection solutions. Our loss quantification revenues increased as a result of new customer contracts and volume increases associated with recent floods and wildfires experienced in the United States. Increased revenue in our loss prediction solutions resulted from sales to new customers as well as increased penetration of our existing customers. Excluding acquisitions, our fraud identification and detection solutions decreased $1.3 million as revenue from our mortgage businesses decreased $6.0 million due to adverse market conditions in that industry, partially offset by increases in our claims solutions as enhancements to the content of our products increased subscription revenues. Our revenue by category for the periods presented is set forth below:
 
                         
    Six Months
       
    Ended June 30,     Percentage
 
    2007     2008     Change  
    (In thousands)        
 
Loss prediction solutions
  $ 38,025     $ 46,260       21.7 %
Fraud identification and detection solutions
    88,532       102,858       16.2 %
Loss quantification solutions
    28,875       35,216       22.0 %
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues for our Decision Analytics segment was $87.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to $71.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $16.0 million or 22.3%. The increase included $10.0 million in costs attributable to the newly acquired companies. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, the cost of revenues increased $6.0 million, primarily due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits of $5.4 million across a relatively constant employee headcount, which includes annual increases in salary increases, medical costs, and equity compensation costs, $0.9 million increase in office maintenance costs and an increase in other operating expenses of $1.5 million, partially offset by $1.9 million in lower acquisition contingent payments associated with acquisitions made in the prior period. As a percentage of Decision Analytics revenues, cost of revenues increased to 47.5% from 46.1%.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $22.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $20.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $1.5 million or 7.4%. The increase was due to $0.6 million in costs attributable to the newly acquired companies, and $1.3 million in costs due to increased salaries and employee benefits costs, which include annual salary increases, medical costs and long-term incentive plans across a relatively constant employee headcount. This increase was partially offset by lower advertising and marketing costs of $0.4 million. As a percentage of Decision Analytics revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 12.1% from 13.4%.
 
EBITDA Margin
 
The EBITDA margin for our Decision Analytics segment was 40.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 40.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
Consolidated Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues were $802.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $730.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $72.1 million or 9.9%. This increase was primarily due to the inclusion of Xactware, which was acquired in August 2006, for the full year, as well as several other acquisitions made during the latter part of 2006 and during 2007. Xactware contributed $63.2 million in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $22.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and revenues from other acquisitions increased $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007


34


Table of Contents

compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, revenues increased $24.6 million which was comprised of an increase of $12.5 million in our Risk Assessment segment and an increase of $12.0 million in our Decision Analytics segment.
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues was $357.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $331.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $25.4 million or 7.7%. The increase was primarily due to $22.7 million in costs attributable to the inclusion of the full year results of our acquisitions in 2006 and the acquisitions in 2007. Excluding these acquisitions, our cost of revenues increased by $2.6 million partially due to an increase in salaries and benefits of $12.5 million resulting from growth in headcount and other operating expenses of $1.0 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in acquisition contingent payments tied to continuing employment of $8.7 million. As a percentage of revenue, cost of revenues decreased to 44.5% for the year ended December 31, 2007 from 45.4% for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $107.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $100.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $7.5 million or 7.5%. The increase was due to $4.2 million in costs attributable to the inclusion of the results of our acquisitions in 2006 and 2007. Excluding these acquisitions, our selling, general and administrative costs increased by $3.3 million primarily as a result of an increase in salaries and benefits of $2.4 million, an increase in equity compensation costs of $1.1 million and an increase in financial system upgrade costs of $0.7 million and $0.6 million of advertising costs. These increases were partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in sales commission expense resulting from a change in commission rates in 2007. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 13.4% from 13.7%.
 
Depreciation and Amortization of Fixed Assets
 
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets were $31.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $28.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $3.7 million or 13.3%. This increase is primarily due to our continuing investment in developing new products and enhancements to existing products as well as the continued investment in our technology infrastructure to support and grow our revenues. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization of fixed assets increased to 4.0% from 3.8%.
 
Amortization of Intangible Assets
 
Amortization of intangibles assets was $33.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $7.0 million or 26.3%. This increase is the result of having a full year of amortization in 2007 on the intangible assets related to the acquisition of Xactware in 2006, partially offset by the final amortization during 2007 of intangible assets related to other acquisitions.
 
Investment Income and Realized Gains (Losses) on Securities, Net
 
Investment income and realized gains (losses) on securities, net was $9.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $3.2 million or 52.6%. This increase is primarily due to a $2.0 million gain on our investment portfolio as well as an increase of $1.0 million in interest income primarily earned on acquisition escrow deposits.
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense was $22.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $16.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $6.2 million or 37.6%. This increase is primarily the


35


Table of Contents

result of an increase in the weighted average balance of debt outstanding as well as higher rates of interest on long-term borrowings.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
Provision for income taxes was $103.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $86.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $16.3 million or 18.7%. The effective tax rate was 40.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 37.3% for the year ended December 31, 2006, which included the favorable settlement of certain tax contingencies.
 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax was $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $2.8 million or 154.2%, reflecting exit costs, net of tax, including $1.7 million in the impairment of goodwill, associated with the discontinuation of our claim consulting business.
 
Risk Assessment Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues for our Risk Assessment segment were $485.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $472.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $12.5 million or 2.7%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the sales of our industry-standard insurance programs, which was partially offset by a decrease in the sales of our auto premium leakage identification solutions due to a softening in the auto insurance market. The increase in our industry-standard insurance programs primarily results from an increase in prices derived from continued enhancements to the content of our solutions and to a lesser extent, changes in our customer’s premium volumes. Increases from sales of additional lines of our services to existing customers are offset by lost revenue resulting from consolidation within the property and casualty insurance industry. Our revenue by category for the periods presented is set forth below:
 
                         
    Year Ended
   
    December 31,   Percentage
    2006   2007   Change
    (In thousands)    
 
Industry standard insurance programs
  $ 303,957     $ 311,087       2.3 %
Property-specific rating and underwriting information
    123,627       126,291       2.2 %
Statistical agency and data services
    25,793       27,282       5.8 %
Actuarial services
    19,257       20,500       6.5 %
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues for our Risk Assessment segment was $204.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $203.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $0.3 million or 0.1%. The increase was primarily due to salary and benefit increases of $2.0 million and an increase in equity compensation costs of $2.3 million. These increases were offset by a decrease in outsourced temporary agency costs of $1.9 million, a decrease in software maintenance expenses of $1.2 million, and a decrease in acquisition contingent payments associated with acquisitions of $1.1 million. As a percentage of Risk Assessment revenues, cost of revenues decreased to 42.1% from 43.1%.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses for our Risk Assessment segment were $68.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $65.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $2.3 million or 3.5%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in salary and benefits of


36


Table of Contents

$2.0 million, $0.6 million in costs to upgrade our financial systems and an increase in equity compensation costs of $0.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in commission expense of $1.4 million, resulting from a change in the commission plan in 2007. As a percentage of Risk Assessment revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 14.1% from 13.9%.
 
EBITDA Margin
 
The EBITDA margin for our Risk Assessment segment was 43.9% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 42.9% for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
Decision Analytics Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues for our Decision Analytics segment were $317.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $257.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $59.5 million or 23.1%. This increase reflects the inclusion of Xactware, our loss quantification solution, which was acquired in August 2006, for the full year, as well as several other acquisitions made during the latter part of 2006 and during 2007. Xactware contributed $63.2 million in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $22.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the other acquisitions contributed $6.5 million of additional 2007 revenue compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, revenues increased $12.0 million primarily due to an increase in sales of our loss prediction solutions resulting from revenue from new customers as well as increased usage by our existing customers. Within our fraud identification and detection solutions, growth in our claims solutions and criminal record products were offset by decreased revenue of $10.6 million in our mortgage solutions due to adverse market conditions in that industry. Our revenue by category for the periods presented is set forth below:
 
                         
    Year Ended
       
    December 31,     Percentage
 
    2006     2007     Change  
    (In thousands)        
 
Loss prediction solutions
  $ 67,129     $ 81,110       20.8 %
Fraud identification and detection solutions
    168,189       172,726       2.7 %
Loss quantification solutions
    22,181       63,199       184.9 %
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues for our Decision Analytics segment was $153.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $127.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $25.1 million or 19.6%. The increase was primarily due to $22.7 million in costs attributable to the inclusion of the full year results of our acquisitions in 2006 and the acquisitions completed in 2007. Excluding these acquisitions, our cost of revenues increased by $2.4 million, partially due to salary and benefit increases of $5.9 million, an increase in equity compensation costs of $1.8 million, an increase in outsourced temporary agency fees of $2.8 million and an increase of $0.7 million in leased software, partially offset by a decrease in acquisition contingent payments tied to continuing employment of $7.6 million and $1.4 million on disposal of assets. As a percentage of Decision Analytics revenues, cost of revenues decreased to 48.3% from 49.7%.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $39.4 million for our Decision Analytics segment for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $34.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $5.2 million or 15.0%. The increase was primarily due to $4.2 million in costs attributable to the acquired businesses. Excluding these acquisitions, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was $1.0 million, primarily due to an increase of $0.4 million of salaries and benefits and $0.4 million in advertising costs. As a percentage of Decision Analytics revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 12.4% from 13.3%.


37


Table of Contents

EBITDA Margin
 
The EBITDA margin for our Decision Analytics segment was 39.3% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 37.0% for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005
 
Consolidated Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues were $730.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $645.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $84.5 million or 13.1%. This increase in part reflected the inclusion of acquisitions made in 2006, which contributed $23.6 million in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006, and acquisitions made in 2005, which contributed $16.4 million of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Excluding these acquisitions, revenues increased $56.8 million which was comprised of an increase of $23.8 million in our Risk Assessment segment and an increase of $33.0 million in our Decision Analytics segment.
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues was $331.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $294.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $36.9 million or 12.5%. The increase was primarily due to $17.9 million in costs attributable to the inclusion of the full year results of our acquisitions in 2005 and the acquisitions completed in 2006. Excluding these acquisitions, the increase in cost of revenues is $19.0 million, consisting primarily of increases in personnel costs of $18.9 million. The increase in personnel costs consists of $10.7 million of salaries and benefits resulting from growth in headcount, a $6.5 million increase in equity compensation costs and a $1.0 million increase in pension costs. As a percentage of revenue, cost of revenues decreased slightly to 45.4% from 45.7%.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $100.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $88.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $11.4 million or 12.9%. The increase was due to $3.8 million in costs attributable to the inclusion of the full year results of our acquisitions in 2005 and the partial year results of the acquisitions completed in 2006. Excluding these acquisitions, our selling general and administrative costs increased by $7.6 million, primarily as a result of an increase in legal costs of $3.4 million, an increase in salary and benefits of $1.7 million as a result of growth in headcount, an increase in commissions of $1.8 million as a result of an increase in new sales and an increase in equity compensation costs of $1.5 million. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses remained unchanged at 13.7%.
 
Depreciation and Amortization of Fixed Assets
 
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets were $28.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $22.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $6.0 million or 27.2%. This increase is primarily due to investments in our technology infrastructure, as well as continuing investments in developing and enhancing our solutions. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization of fixed assets increased to 3.8% from 3.4%.
 
Amortization of Intangible Assets
 
Amortization of intangible assets increased to $26.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $7.1 million or 35.6%. This increase is primarily due to the amortization of intangibles related to the acquisition of Xactware during August 2006.


38


Table of Contents

Investment Income and Realized Gains (Losses) on Securities, Net
 
Investment income and realized gains (losses) on securities, net was $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $3.2 million or 108.1%. This increase is primarily due to a $2.6 million increase in interest earned on money market accounts, interest received on acquisition escrow deposits and interest earned on stockholder loans as well as a $0.3 million increase in dividend income.
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense was $16.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $6.2 million or 59.3%. The increase is primarily the result of higher average debt outstanding as well as higher rates of interest on long-term borrowings.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
Provision for income taxes was $86.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $85.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $1.2 million or 1.4%. The effective tax rate was 37.3% for the year ended December 31, 2006, which included the favorable settlement of certain tax contingencies, compared to 40.3% for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax was $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, a decrease of $0.8 million or 29.9%, primarily resulting from a $1.1 million impairment charge, net of tax, in 2005.
 
Risk Assessment Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues for our Risk Assessment segment were $472.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $448.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $23.7 million or 5.3%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the sales of our industry-standard insurance programs and an increase in the demand for our property-specific rating and underwriting information. The increase in our industry-standard insurance programs primarily results from an increase in prices derived from continued enhancements to the content of our solutions and to a lesser extent, changes in our customer’s premium volumes. Increases from sales of additional lines of our services to existing customers are offset by lost revenue resulting from mergers of certain customers within the property and casualty insurance industry. Our revenue by category for the periods presented is set forth below:
 
                         
    Year Ended
   
    December 31,   Percentage
    2005   2006   Change
    (In thousands)    
 
Industry standard insurance programs
  $ 290,204     $ 303,957       4.7 %
Property-specific rating and underwriting information
    114,467       123,627       8.0 %
Statistical agency and data services
    25,228       25,793       2.2 %
Actuarial services
    18,976       19,257       1.5 %
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues for our Risk Assessment segment was $203.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $191.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $12.4 million or 6.5%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in salary and benefits of $14.6 million and an increase in equity compensation costs of $3.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in legal costs of


39


Table of Contents

$1.2 million and professional consulting costs of $0.9 million. As a percentage of Risk Assessment revenues, cost of revenues increased to 43.1% from 42.6%.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses for our Risk Assessment segment were $65.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $61.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $4.5 million or 7.3%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in equity compensation costs of $1.3 million, an increase in sales commission expense of $1.2 million and an increase in legal expense of $2.9 million. As a percentage of Risk Assessment revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 13.9% from 13.7%.
 
EBITDA Margin
 
The EBITDA margin for our Risk Assessment segment was 42.9% for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 43.7% for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
Decision Analytics Results of Operations
 
Revenues
 
Revenues for our Decision Analytics segment were $257.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $196.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $60.7 million or 30.9%. During 2006 and 2005, we acquired seven companies that accounted for $27.7 million of additional revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, revenues increased $33.0 million due to an increase in sales of our loss prediction solutions, resulting from revenue from new customers as well as increased usage by our existing customers and an increase in revenue from our fraud identification and detection solutions due to continued enhancements in the solutions which resulted in increased sales. The increase from acquisitions was primarily due to the inclusion of Xactware, which was purchased in August 2006 and generated $22.2 million in revenue subsequent to the acquisition. Our revenue by category for the periods presented is set forth below:
 
                         
    Year Ended
       
    December 31,     Percentage
 
    2005     2006     Change  
    (In thousands)        
 
Loss prediction solutions
  $ 53,527     $ 67,129       25.4 %
Fraud identification and detection solutions
    143,258       168,189       17.4 %
Loss quantification solutions
          22,181        
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues for our Decision Analytics segment was $127.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $103.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $24.5 million, or 23.7%. The increase was primarily due to $17.9 million in costs attributable to the inclusion of the full year results of our acquisitions in 2005 and the acquisitions completed during 2006. Excluding these acquisitions, our cost of revenues increased by $6.6 million. The increase in cost of revenues was primarily due to increases in personnel costs of $4.5 million and a loss on disposal of assets of $1.4 million. The increase in personnel costs consists of $1.5 million of salaries and benefits resulting from annual salary increases across a relatively constant employee headcount and a $3.0 million increase in equity compensation costs. As a percentage of Decision Analytics revenues, cost of revenues decreased to 49.7% from 52.5%.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses for our Decision Analytics segment were $34.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $27.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an


40


Table of Contents

increase of $6.9 million or 25.3%. The increase was primarily due to $3.8 million in costs attributable to the acquired businesses. Excluding these acquisitions, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was $3.3 million primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $2.6 million and an increase in commissions of $0.6 million. As a percentage of Decision Analytics revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 13.3% from 13.9%.
 
EBITDA Margin
 
The EBITDA margin for our Decision Analytics segment was 37.0% for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 33.6% for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents and available-for sale securities of $52.4 million and $57.3 million, respectively. Subscriptions for our solutions are billed and generally paid in advance of rendering services either quarterly or in full upon commencement of the subscription period, which is usually for one year, and they are automatically renewed at the beginning of each calendar year. Accordingly, our cash flow from operations tends to be higher in the first half of the year as we receive subscription payments. As a result of these billings and related receipts, our accounts receivable and fees received in advance at June 30, 2008 were $3.9 million and $49.2 million higher than the balances at December 31, 2007, respectively. We have historically generated significant cash flows from operations. As a result of this factor, as well as the availability of funds under our credit facilities, we believe we will have sufficient cash to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs, including potential acquisitions.
 
We have historically managed the business with a working capital deficit due to the fact that, as described above, we offer our solutions and services primarily through annual subscriptions or long-term contracts, which are generally prepaid quarterly or annually in advance of the services being rendered. When cash is received for prepayment of invoices, we record an asset (cash and cash equivalents) on our balance sheet with the offset recorded as a current liability (fees received in advance). This current liability is deferred revenue that does not require a direct cash outflow since our customers have prepaid and are obligated to purchase the services. In most businesses, growth in revenue typically leads to an increase in the accounts receivable balance causing a use of cash as a company grows. Unlike these businesses, our cash position is favorably affected by revenue growth, which results in a source of cash due to our customers prepaying for most of our services.
 
Our capital expenditures as a percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were 3.7%, 3.5% and 4.1%, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 were 5.8% and 4.1%. We estimate our capital expenditures for the remainder of 2008 and full year 2009 to be approximately $16.0 million and $36.0 million, respectively, which primarily includes expenditures on our technology infrastructure and our continuing investments in developing and enhancing our solutions. Expenditures related to developing and enhancing our solutions are predominately related to internal use software and are capitalized in accordance with AICPA SOP No. 98-1, “Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” The amounts capitalized in accordance with FAS No. 86 “Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed,” are not significant to the financial statements.
 
To provide liquidity to our stockholders, we have also historically used our cash for repurchases of our common stock from our stockholders. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 we repurchased or redeemed $181.2 million, $128.0 million and $204.8 million, respectively, of our common stock, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 we repurchased or redeemed $92.4 million and $237.1 million, respectively, of our common stock. A substantial portion of the share redemption included in the totals above were completed pursuant to the terms of the Insurance Service Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan, which will automatically terminate upon consummation of this offering. Therefore, we do not expect to continue our historical practice of using cash for common stock repurchases to provide liquidity to our stockholders.


41


Table of Contents

 
Financing and Financing Capacity
 
We had total debt, excluding capital lease and other obligations, of $630.0 million at June 30, 2008 and $265.3 million, $440.0 million and $425.0 million at December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Approximately $545.0 million of this debt at June 30, 2008 was held under long-term loan facilities drawn to finance our stock repurchases and acquisitions and the remaining $85.0 million was held pursuant to our revolving credit facilities.
 
We have long-term loan facilities under uncommitted master shelf agreements with Prudential Capital Group, or Prudential, and New York Life with available funds at June 30, 2008 in the amount of $65.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively. We can borrow under the Prudential uncommitted master shelf agreement until February 28, 2010 and under the New York Life facility until March 16, 2010. Our notes mature over the next seven years. Individual borrowings are made at a fixed rate of interest and interest is payable quarterly. The uncommitted master shelf agreements contain certain covenants that limit our ability to create liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and consolidate, merge or sell assets to another company. The uncommitted master shelf agreements also contain financial covenants that require us to maintain a fixed charge coverage of no less than 275% and a leverage ratio of no more than 300%. As of the date of this prospectus, we are in full compliance with all of the covenants contained in these agreements. The weighted average rate of interest with respect to our outstanding long-term borrowings was 5.38% and 5.50% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and 3.90%, 4.75% and 5.23% for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
 
We finance our short-term working capital needs through cash from operations and borrowings from our short-term credit facilities, which are made at variable rates of interest based on LIBOR plus 0.65%. We had $30.0 million and $85.0 million in short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively. We had $150.0 million in short-term credit facilities available to us at June 30, 2008, of which $55.0 million are committed lines.
 
Cash Flow
 
The following table summarizes our cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.
 
                                         
    For the Year Ended
    For the Six Months
 
    December 31,     Ended June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 174,071     $ 223,499     $ 248,521     $ 117,136     $ 141,929  
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (107,444 )   $ (243,452 )   $ (110,831 )   $ (49,403 )   $ (98,402 )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
  $ (90,954 )   $ 75,907     $ (212,591 )   $ (127,194 )   $ (16,759 )
 
Operating Activities
 
Net cash provided by operating activities increased from $117.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $141.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The $24.8 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities was principally due to an increase in fees received in advance for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net cash provided by operating activities was $174.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, $223.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $248.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The $25.0 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2006 to 2007 was principally due to growth in net income and improved accounts receivable collections, partially offset by reduced growth in our cash received in advance from our customers. The $49.4 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2005 to 2006 primarily reflected strong growth in net income and an increase in cash received in advance from customers, partially offset by reduced growth of trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005.


42


Table of Contents

 
Investing Activities
 
Net cash used in investing activities was $49.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and $98.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was principally due to the payment of acquisition related liabilities resulting from achievement of post-acquisition performance targets. Net cash used by investing activities was $110.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, $243.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $107.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in net cash used by investing activities from 2006 to 2007 and the increase in net cash used by investing activities from 2005 to 2006 were principally due to the acquisition of Xactware during August 2006.
 
Financing Activities
 
Net cash used in financing activities was $127.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and $16.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities was principally due to the redemptions or repurchases of common stock, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt. Net cash used by financing activities was $212.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash provided by financing activities was $75.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, and net cash used by financing activities was $91.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The change in net cash provided by financing activities from 2006 to 2007 and the change in net cash used by financing activities from 2005 to 2006 were principally due to the repurchases of common stock and the repayment of our short term debt.
 
Contractual Obligations
 
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commercial commitments at December 31, 2007, and the future periods in which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash:
 
                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
          Less than
                More than
 
    Total     1 Year     1-3 Years     3-5 Years     5 Years  
    (In thousands)  
 
Contractual obligations
                                       
Long-term debt
  $ 496,638     $ 21,512     $ 143,967     $ 149,594     $ 181,565  
Capital lease obligations
    12,401       4,818       7,419       164        
Operating leases
    209,409       19,285       37,115       35,562       117,447  
ESOP contribution
    8,000                         8,000  
Earnout and contingent payment
    123,700       100,300       23,400              
Other long-term liabilities(1)
    322,029       27,091       56,342       60,210       178,386  
                                         
Total(2)
  $ 1,172,177     $ 173,006     $ 268,243     $ 245,530     $ 485,398  
                                         
 
 
(1) Other long-term liabilities shown in the table above consists of our pension plan, deferred compensation plan and the post-retirement plan, including administrative expenses, net of employee contributions and net of the federal Medical subsidy. We also have a deferred compensation plan for our Board of Directors. Our funding policy is to contribute an amount at least equal to the minimum legal funding requirement. Based on past performance and the uncertainty of the dollar amounts to be paid, if any, we have excluded such amounts from the above table.
 
(2) We have FIN 48 obligations that represent uncertain tax positions related to temporary differences of $7.7 million that have been omitted from the table above. Approximately $32.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with FIN 48, and we are uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled, with the exception of those amounts subject to a statute of limitation. Related to the unrecognized tax benefits not included in the table above, we have also recorded a liability for potential penalties and interest of $7.0 million.


43


Table of Contents

 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management considers the policies discussed below to be critical to understanding our financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on management’s judgment, and requires management to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company’s revenues are primarily derived from sales of services and revenue is recognized as services are preformed and information is delivered to our customers. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, fees and/or price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues for subscription services are recognized ratably over the subscription term, usually one year. Revenues from transaction-based fees are recognized as information is delivered to customers, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
 
The Company also has term based software licenses where the only remaining undelivered element is post-contract customer support or PCS, including unspecified upgrade rights on a when and if available basis. The Company recognizes revenue for these licenses ratably over the duration of the license term. The Company also provides hosting or software solutions that provide continuous access to information and include PCS and recognizes revenue ratably over the duration of the license term. In addition, the determination of certain of our services revenues requires the use of estimates, principally related to transaction volumes in instances where these volumes are reported to us by our clients on a monthly basis in arrears. In these instances, we estimate transaction volumes based on average actual volumes reported by our customers in the past. Differences between our estimates and actual final volumes reported are recorded in the period in which actual volumes are reported. We have not experienced significant variances between our estimates of these services revenues reported to us by our customers and actual reported volumes in the past.
 
We invoice our customers in annual, quarterly, or monthly installments. Amounts billed and collected in advance are recorded as fees received in advance on the balance sheet and are recognized as the services are performed and revenue recognition criteria are met.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
On January 1, 2005, we adopted FAS No.  123(R) using a prospective approach, which required us to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption. The following table illustrates the amount of compensation expense resulting from the implementation of FAS No.  123(R) using the


44


Table of Contents

prospective approach for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.
 
                                         
          For the Six
 
    For the Year Ended
    Months Ended
 
    December 31     June 30,  
    2005     2006     2007     2007     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
2005 grants
  $ 4,094     $ 2,661     $ 2,424     $ 1,239     $ 1,158  
2006 grants
            3,487       2,512       1,256       1,171  
2007 grants
                    3,308       1,261       1,313  
2008 grants*
                                    979  
Total stock-based compensation
  $ 4,094     $ 6,148     $ 8,244     $ 3,756     $ 4,621  
 
* Only includes grants through June 30, 2008
 
According to FAS No. 123(R) we only use the prospective approach for the prior four years of grants, each of which have a four year vesting term, therefore our 2009 financial statements will reflect compensation expenses relating to grants from 2006 to 2009.
 
The fair value of equity awards is measured on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of several estimates, including expected term, expected risk-free interest rate, expected volatility and expected dividend yield.
 
Under FAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the awards granted, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Option grants are expensed ratably over the four-year vesting period. We follow the substantive vesting period approach for awards granted after the adoption of FAS No. 123(R), which requires that stock-based compensation expense be recognized over the period from the date of grant to the date when the award is no longer contingent on the employee providing additional service.
 
We estimate expected forfeitures of equity awards at the date of grant and recognize compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate.
 
The fair value of the common stock underlying the stock-based compensation is determined quarterly on or about the final day of the quarter. The valuation methodology is based on a variety of qualitative and quantitative factors including the nature of the business and history of the enterprise, the economic outlook in general and the condition of the specific industries in which we operate, the financial condition of the business, our ability to generate free cash flow, and goodwill or other intangible asset value.
 
The fair value of our common stock is determined using generally accepted valuation methodologies, including the use of the guideline company method. This determination of fair market value employs both a comparable company analysis, which examines the valuation multiples of public companies deemed comparable, in whole or in part, to us and a discounted cash flow analysis that determines a present value of the projected future cash flows of the business. The comparable companies are comprised of a combination of public companies in the financial services information and technology businesses. These methodologies have been consistently applied since 1997. We regularly assess the underlying assumptions used in the valuation methodologies, including the comparable companies to be used in the analysis, the future forecasts of revenue and earnings, and the impact of market conditions on factors such as the weighted average cost of capital. These assumptions are reviewed quarterly, with a more comprehensive evaluation performed annually. For the comparable company analysis, the share price and financial performance of these comparables are updated quarterly based on the most recent public information. In periods subsequent to acquisitions, our stock price has generally increased based on the increase in the discounted cash flows of the consolidated enterprise. Our stock price is also impacted by the number of shares outstanding. As the number of shares outstanding has declined overtime, our share price has increased. The determination of the fair value of our common stock


45


Table of Contents

requires us to make judgments that are complex and inherently subjective. If different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in the future.
 
Goodwill and Intangibles
 
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of tangible net assets and identifiable intangible assets of the businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized. Intangible assets determined to have definite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are subject to impairment testing annually as of June 30, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable, using the guidance and criteria described in FAS No. 142, “ Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets .” This testing compares carrying values to fair values and, when appropriate, the carrying value of these assets is reduced to fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2007, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, included in loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
As of June 30, 2008, we had goodwill and net intangible assets of $481.6 million, which represents 55.5% of our total assets. There are many assumptions and estimates used that directly impact the results of impairment testing, including an estimate of future expected revenues, earnings and cash flows, useful lives and discount rates applied to such expected cash flows in order to estimate fair value. We have the ability to influence the outcome and ultimate results based on the assumptions and estimates we choose for determining the fair value of our reporting units. To mitigate undue influence, we set criteria and benchmarks that are reviewed and approved by various levels of management and reviewed by other independent parties. The determination of whether or not goodwill or indefinite-lived acquired intangible assets have become impaired involves a significant level of judgment in the assumptions and estimates underlying the approach used to determine the value of our reporting units. Changes in our strategy or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments and require adjustments to recorded amounts of intangible assets and goodwill.
 
Pension and Postretirement
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 158, “ Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. ” FAS No. 158 requires that employers recognize on a prospective basis the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on their consolidated balance sheets and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. Additional minimum pension liabilities and related intangible assets are also derecognized upon adoption of the new standard. We adopted FAS No. 158 as of December 31, 2006.
 
Certain assumptions are used in the determination of our annual net period benefit cost and the disclosure of the funded status of these plans. The principal assumptions concern the discount rate used to measure the projected benefit obligation, the expected future rate of return on plan assets and the expected rate of future compensation increases. We revise these assumptions based on an annual evaluation of long-term trends and market conditions that may have an impact on the cost of providing retirement benefits. In determining the discount rate, we utilize market conditions and other data sources management considers reasonable based upon the profile of the remaining service life of eligible employees. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined by taking into consideration the weighted-average expected return on our asset allocation, asset return data, historical return data, and the current economic environment. We believe these considerations provide the basis for reasonable assumptions of the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The rate of compensation increase is based on our long-term plans for such increases. The measurement date used to determine the benefit obligation and plan assets is December 31. The future benefit payments for the postretirement plan are net of the federal Medical subsidy.


46


Table of Contents

A one percent change in discount rate, future rate of return on plan assets and the rate of future compensation would have the following effects:
 
                                 
    1% Decrease     1% Increase  
          Projected Benefit
          Projected Benefit
 
    Benefit Cost     Obligation     Benefit Cost     Obligation  
    (In thousands)  
 
Discount rate
  $ 483     $ 40,166     $ 673     $ (33,861 )
Expected return on asset
    3,326             (3,326 )      
Rate of compensation
    (520 )     (2,906 )     530       2,932  
 
A one percent change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 
                 
    1% Decrease     1% Increase  
    (In thousands)  
 
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
  $ (7 )   $ 4  
Effect on the healthcare component of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
    (136 )     76  
 
Income Taxes
 
In projecting future taxable income, we develop assumptions including the amount of future state, federal and foreign pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates we use to manage the underlying businesses. The calculation of our tax liabilities also involves dealing with uncertainties in the application and evolution of complex tax laws and regulations in other jurisdictions.
 
On January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes —  an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 , or FIN 48. FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized approximately a $10.3 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of accumulated deficit.
 
We recognize tax liabilities in accordance with FIN 48 and we adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined. If the tax liabilities relate to tax uncertainties existing at the date of the acquisition of a business, the adjustment of such tax liabilities will result in an adjustment to the goodwill recorded at the date of acquisition.
 
As of December 31, 2007 we have federal and state income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $6.7 million and $104.1 million which will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2027. Such net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows:
 
         
2008 - 2015
  $ 78.8 million  
2016 - 2020
    0.6 million  
2021 - 2027
    31.4 million  
         
    $ 110.8 million  
         
 
The significant majority of the state net operating loss carryforwards were generated by a subsidiary that employs our internal staff as a result of favorable tax deductions from the exercise of employee stock


47


Table of Contents

options for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006. This subsidiary’s state net operating loss carryforwards will not be utilized unless the subsidiary is profitable prior to their respective expiration dates.
 
We also have foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $6.0 million that have no expiration date. We believe that it is reasonably possible that approximately $3.4 million of our currently remaining unrecognized tax positions, each of which are individually insignificant, may be recognized by the end of 2008 as a result of a lapse of the statute of limitations.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“FAS No. 141(R)”). FAS No. 141(R) replaces FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“FAS No. 141”). FAS No. 141(R) primarily requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, measured at their fair values as of that date. This replaces FAS No. 141’s cost-allocation process, which required the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Generally, FAS No. 141(R) will become effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
 
For a discussion of additional recent accounting pronouncements, see note 2(n) to the audited consolidated financial statements and note 2(p) to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. At June 30, 2008 we had borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facilities of $85.0 million, which bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus 0.65%. A change in interest rates on this variable rate debt impacts our pre-tax income and cash flows, but does not impact the fair value of the instruments. Based on our overall interest rate exposure at June 30, 2008, a one percent change in interest rates would result in a change in annual pretax interest expense of approximately $8.5 million based on our current level of borrowings.


48


Table of Contents

 
BUSINESS
 
Company Overview
 
We enable risk-bearing businesses to better understand and manage their risks. We provide value to our customers by supplying proprietary data that, combined with our analytic methods, creates embedded decision support solutions. We are the largest aggregator and provider of detailed actuarial and underwriting data pertaining to U.S. property and casualty, or P&C, insurance risks. We offer solutions for detecting fraud in the U.S. P&C insurance, healthcare and mortgage industries and sophisticated methods to predict and quantify loss in diverse contexts ranging from natural catastrophes to health insurance.
 
Our customers use our solutions to make better risk decisions with greater efficiency and discipline. We refer to these products and services as ‘solutions’ due to the integration among our services and the flexibility that enables our customers to purchase components or the comprehensive package. These ‘solutions’ take various forms, including data, statistical models or tailored analytics, all designed to allow our clients to make more logical decisions. We believe our solutions for analyzing risk positively impact our customers’ revenues and help them better manage their costs. In 2007, our U.S. customers included all of the top 100 P&C insurance providers, four of the 10 largest Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans, four of the seven leading mortgage insurers, 14 of the top 20 mortgage lenders and 8 of the 10 largest global reinsurers. We believe that our commitment to our customers and the embedded nature of our solutions serve to strengthen and extend our relationships. For example, approximately 96% of our top 200 customers in 2007, as ranked by revenue, have been our customers for each of the last five years. Further, from 2003 to 2007, revenues generated from these top 200 customers grew at a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 13%.
 
We help those businesses address what we believe are the four primary decision making processes essential for managing risk as set forth below in the Verisk Risk Analysis Framework:
 
The Verisk Risk Analysis Framework
 
RISK ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK
 
These four processes correspond to various functional areas inside our customers’ operations:
 
  •      our loss predictions are typically used by P&C insurance and healthcare actuaries, advanced analytics groups and loss control groups to help drive their own assessments of future losses;
 
  •      our risk selection and pricing solutions are typically used by underwriters as they manage their books of business;
 
  •      our fraud detection and prevention tools are used by P&C insurance, healthcare and mortgage underwriters to root out fraud prospectively and by claims departments to speed claims and find fraud retroactively; and
 
  •      our tools to quantify loss are primarily used by claims departments, independent adjustors and contractors.
 
We add value by linking our solutions across these four key processes; for example, we use the same modeling methods to support the pricing of homeowner’s insurance policies and to quantify the actual losses when damage occurs to insured homes.
 
We offer our solutions and services primarily through annual subscriptions or long-term agreements, which are typically pre-paid and represented approximately 74% of our revenue in 2007. Our subscription-based revenue model, in combination with high renewal rates, results in large and predictable cash flows. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, we had revenue of $802 million and $438 million, respectively, and net income of $150 million and $81 million, respectively. For the five year


49


Table of Contents

period ended December 31, 2007, our revenues and net income have grown at a CAGR of 13.8% and 21.2%, respectively.
 
We organize our business in two segments: Risk Assessment and Decision Analytics.
 
Risk Assessment:   We are the leading provider of statistical, actuarial and underwriting data for the U.S. P&C insurance industry. Our databases include cleansed and standardized records describing premiums and losses in insurance transactions, casualty and property risk attributes for commercial buildings and their occupants and fire suppression capabilities of municipalities. Our largest P&C insurance database, containing information on every transaction associated with a policy, from inception to information on losses, includes almost 14 billion records, and, in each of the past three years, we updated the database with over 2 billion validated new records to improve the timeliness, quality and accuracy of our data and actuarial analysis. We use our data for example to create policy language and proprietary risk classifications that are industry-standard and to generate prospective loss cost estimates used to price insurance policies.
 
As an example of how customers use our Risk Assessment services, P&C insurers use our Specific Property Information suite, or SPI Plus, to underwrite and price commercial property risks. SPI Plus is built on a proprietary database of approximately 2.7 million buildings and more than 5.4 million individual businesses occupying those buildings. We maintain information about each building’s construction, occupancy, protective features (e.g., sprinkler systems) and exposure to hazards — collectively known as COPE data — all of which is critical to our customers’ decision making processes. SPI Plus provides detailed narratives regarding hazards of construction and occupancy and unique building-specific analytics that assess the adequacy of sprinkler systems, probable maximum loss due to fire and the overall hazard level in relation to similar buildings. SPI Plus also includes our assessments of municipal fire suppression capability and building code enforcement, and a building’s exposure to additional perils such as wind, crime and flood damage. In addition to underwriting and pricing decisions, our customers use this product for loss cost estimates and to encourage property owners to reduce hazards and employ protection features, such as automatic fire-detection, fire-suppression systems, portable fire extinguishers, standpipe systems and watchman services. Customers receive our data and analytics via the internet. Typically, our loss cost estimates will be automatically entered into an insurer’s policy administration system for rating of the insurance policy, while the COPE data and narrative about the building will be accessed as the underwriter determines whether or not to offer coverage for the building.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, our Risk Assessment segment produced revenue of $485 million and $253 million, representing 60% and 58% of our total revenue, respectively, and EBITDA of $213 million and $114 million, representing 63% and 60% of our total EBITDA, respectively. This segment’s revenue and EBITDA have a CAGR of 7.8% and 14.3%, respectively, for the five-year period ended December 31, 2007.
 
Decision Analytics:   We provide solutions in each of the four processes of the Verisk Risk Analysis Framework by combining algorithms and analytic methods, which incorporate our proprietary data. Other unique data sets include approximately 600 million P&C insurance claims, historical natural catastrophe data covering more than 50 countries, data from more than 13 million applications for mortgage loans and over 300 million U.S. criminal records. Customers integrate our solutions into their models, formulas or underwriting criteria to predict potential loss events, ranging from hurricanes and earthquakes to unanticipated healthcare claims. We are a leading developer of catastrophe and extreme event models and offer solutions covering natural and man-made risks, including acts of terrorism. We also develop solutions that allow customers to quantify costs after loss events occur. For example, in 2007 we provided repair cost estimates for more than 60% of the personal property claims paid in the United States based on total amount of claims paid according to A.M. Best. Our fraud solutions include data on claim histories, analysis of mortgage applications to identify misinformation, analysis of claims to find emerging patterns of fraud and identification of suspicious claims in the insurance, healthcare and mortgage sectors.
 
As an example of how customers use our Decision Analytics products, our CLASIC/2 enterprise software system is used by insurance companies to determine potential losses, and the probability of such losses, for the insurance or reinsurance they provide in regions prone to natural catastrophes such as


50


Table of Contents

hurricanes, earthquakes, hailstorms and tornadoes. The catastrophe models underlying our software are based on the physical principles of meteorology, geology and other sciences, as well as the statistical analysis of historical time series of data on prior natural catastrophes. Our software consists of sophisticated stochastic simulation procedures for projecting the location and severity of future catastrophes and powerful computer models of how natural catastrophes behave and impact buildings and the man-made environment. Our software includes algorithms that translate estimated losses and insurance terms, such as coverages and deductibles, into output that guide underwriters as they select and price risks. Customers receive our software and host the application on their own servers, and link their own databases in order to run their risks through our models. An underwriter can enter the address and characteristics of a single prospective property in manual mode, or the underwriter can work in batch mode where the software reads a file with the addresses and characteristics of many prospective properties. The software returns a series of estimates of the total amount of loss likely in the next year including the amount and cost of damage due to each peril (e.g., earthquake, hurricane, hailstorms and tornadoes), the total expected loss from all perils combined, and the estimated average annual loss. Underwriters use our software to translate damage and loss estimates into a series of recommendations for structuring insurance policies including recommended levels of coverage, deductibles, policy limits and a host of other insurance terms. All of these terms are then fed into the insurers’ policy administration software to determine the premiums to be charged for insurance.
 
In addition to analyzing individual risks, insurance companies can use CLASIC/2’s reporting and visualization tools at the corporate level to assess the aggregate risk and geographic concentration of entire portfolios of risk to determine capital adequacy, to decide how much reinsurance to buy, and to assess the mix of business in their portfolio.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, our Decision Analytics segment produced revenue of $317 million and $184 million, representing 40% and 42% of our total revenue, respectively, and EBITDA of $125 million and $74 million, representing 37% and 40% of our total EBITDA, respectively. This segment’s revenue and EBITDA had a CAGR of 27.8% and 55.4%, respectively, for the five-year period ended December 31, 2007.
 
Our Market Opportunity
 
We believe there is a long-term trend for companies to set strategy and direct operations using data and analytics to guide their decisions, which has resulted in a large and rapidly growing market for professional and business information. According to Veronis Suhler Stevenson, an industry consultant, in a report dated September 2006, spending on professional and business information services in the U.S. reached $61 billion in 2005 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 8% through 2010. Another research firm, International Data Corporation, or IDC, in a report dated March 2008, estimates that the business analytics services market, which totaled $32 billion in 2007, will grow at a CAGR of 9% through 2012.
 
         
GRAPH     GRAPH  


51


Table of Contents

We believe that the consistent decline in the cost of computing power contributes to the trend towards greater use of data and analytics. As a result, larger data sets are assembled faster and at a lower cost per record while the complexity and accuracy of analytical applications and solutions have expanded. This trend has led to an increase in the use of analytic output, which can be generated and applied more quickly, resulting in more informed decision making. As computing power increases, cost decreases and accuracy improves, we believe customers will continue to apply and integrate data and analytic solutions more broadly.
 
Companies that engage in risk transactions, including P&C insurers, healthcare payors and mortgage lenders and insurers, are particularly motivated to use enhanced analytics because of several factors affecting risk markets:
 
  •      the total value of exposures in risk transactions is increasing;
 
  •      the number of participants in risk transactions is often large and the asymmetry of information among participants is often substantial; and
 
  •      the failure to understand risk can lead to large and rapid declines in financial performance.
 
The total value of exposures in risk transactions is increasing
 
Across our target markets, the number and value of the assets managed in risk transactions exhibits long-term growth. For example:
 
  •      U.S. property value exposed to hurricanes continues to increase dramatically due to population dynamics and increase of wealth among other factors, with the current trend predicting a doubling of losses every ten years. At this rate, a repeat of the 1926 Great Miami hurricane could result in $500 billion in economic damage as soon as the 2020’s according to Natural Hazards Review; and
 
  •      U.S. health expenditures have grown at a CAGR of 7% between 1997 and 2007 and are expected to grow at roughly the same level through 2016 according to data compiled by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;
 
  •      the total value of outstanding households’ mortgage debt outstanding in the United States has increased by 11% annually over the past ten years according to the Federal Reserve.
 
The number of participants in risk transactions is often large and the asymmetry of information among participants is often substantial
 
Many risk transactions involve multiple participants who either structure the transaction or bear some of the risk. For example, in the P&C insurance industry, a single commercial building might be assessed, underwritten and insured by a combination of insurance agents and brokers, managing general agents, loss inspection consultants, underwriters, reinsurers, corporate risk managers and capital markets participants looking to securitize the risk of catastrophic loss. In the healthcare industry, insurers and third-party administrators strive to refine their understanding of transactions at the point at which care is delivered to the patient and to determine the legitimacy of claims filed by providers and insureds. Investors in mortgages are far removed from the mortgage brokers and lenders who originate the loans, the appraisers who assess the mortgaged properties, the servicers who manage the cash flows associated with the mortgages, and the packagers who assemble pools of loans to be securitized.
 
Due to the greater separation of counterparties and the potential asymmetry of data about underlying risks available to counterparties, the different participants in such transactions are in jeopardy of knowing less than their counterparties about the risk they bear. In the securitization and trading markets, this problem is exacerbated by the loss of information through the pooling of risks.
 
One outcome of asymmetric information is fraudulent transactions. The Coalition Against Insurance Fraud estimates that the cost of fraud in the U.S. P&C insurance industry is as high as $80 billion each year.


52


Table of Contents

The U.S. government estimates fraudulent billings to U.S. healthcare programs, both public and private, to be between 3% to 10% of total annual healthcare expenditures, or between $67 billion and $226 billion in 2007.
 
Failure to understand risk can lead to large and rapid declines in performance
 
Any company that bears risk will find its profits predominantly tied directly to its ability to select risks. In the P&C insurance industry, the cost of goods sold is unknown to the insurer at the time the insurance policy is written. Therefore, efficient pricing of insurance policies depends on the ability to predict the potential losses and costs associated with underwriting each policy. There are a significant number of factors which correlate with the size of a potential loss, including weather, geographic location of risk, insured characteristics and prior claims costs. An insurance company differentiates itself by utilizing appropriate and reliable data and complex analytics to select the risks that will have the best risk-return profile. The importance of predicting loss in order to select and price risk, and the linkage of these analytics to profitability, is true for all companies participating in risk-bearing transactions.
 
The current U.S. mortgage crisis provides an example of how failure to understand risk can lead to a rapid loss of performance by companies that bear risk. As the housing sector and mortgage origination market expanded rapidly in the first half of this decade, the need for underwriting discipline and risk analysis was underestimated by mortgage brokers, lenders, investors and regulators. We believe the mortgage “bubble” that ended in 2007 masked the need to integrate analytics into the origination and securitization processes in order to manage exposures and profits. The rising level of mortgage default and fraud in 2007 and 2008, combined with severe contraction in the mortgage origination market, has forced 38 mortgage-related entities into failure in 2008 and 150 in 2007, according to the Mortgage Daily. The Mortgage Bankers Association reports a drop from 5,000 mortgage bankers in 2007 to 3,500 mortgage bankers in 2008, based upon lenders that originated at least 100 loans each year. This in turn has heightened awareness among various participants in the market of the need to improve the quality of mortgage underwriting analysis, in part through more sophisticated use of data. This sophisticated use of data may extend beyond the acceptance or rejection of risk to include risk-based pricing in order to enhance financial performance in the face of a challenging market.
 
Our Competitive Strengths
 
We believe our competitive strengths include the following:
 
Our Solutions are Embedded In Our Customers’ Critical Decision Processes
 
Our customers use our solutions to make better risk decisions and to price risk appropriately. These solutions are embedded in our customers’ critical decision processes. In the U.S. P&C insurance industry, our solutions for prospective loss costs, policy language, rating/underwriting rules and regulatory filing services are the industry standard. Our decision analytics solutions facilitate the profitable underwriting of policies. In the U.S. healthcare and mortgage industries, our predictive models, loss estimation tools and fraud
identification applications are the primary solutions that allow customers to understand their risk exposures and proactively manage them. Over the last three years, we have retained 98% of our customers across all of our businesses, which we believe reflects our customers’ recognition of the value they derive from our solutions.
 
Extensive and Differentiated Data Assets and Analytic Methods
 
We maintain what we believe are some of the largest, most accurate, and most complete databases in the markets we serve. Our unique, proprietary data assets allow us to provide our customers with a comprehensive set of risk analytics and decision support solutions. Our largest data sets are sourced from our customers and are not available from any other vendor. Much of the information we provide is not available from any other source and would be difficult and costly for another party to replicate. As a result, our accumulated experience and years of significant investment have given us a competitive advantage in serving our customers. By continuously adding records to our data sets we are able to refresh and to refine our data assets, risk models and other analytic methods.


53


Table of Contents

Culture of Continuous Improvement
 
Our intellectual capital and focus on continuous improvement have allowed us to develop proprietary algorithms and solutions that assist our customers in making informed risk decisions. Our skilled workforce understands issues affecting our targeted markets and to develop analytic solutions tailored to these markets. Our team includes approximately 390 individuals with advanced degrees, certifications and professional designations in such fields as actuarial science, data management, mathematics, statistics, economics, soil mechanics, meteorology and various engineering disciplines. Leveraging the expertise of our people, we have been able to continuously improve our operations by constantly enhancing the timeliness, relevance and quality of our solutions. Over the last three years, we have retained over 95% of our most highly-rated employees. Over the last decade, we transitioned our compensation and benefit plans to be pay-for-performance-oriented, including incentive compensation plans and greater equity participation by employees. Today, our employees own approximately 30% of the company.
 
Attractive Operating Model
 
We believe we have an attractive operating model due to the recurring nature of our revenues, the scalability of our solutions and the low capital intensity of our business.
 
Recurring Nature of Revenues.   We offer our solutions and services primarily through annual subscriptions or long-term agreements, which are generally pre-paid and represented approximately 74% of our revenues in 2007. The combination of our historically high renewal rates, which we believe are due to the embedded nature of our solutions, and our subscription-based revenue model, results in predictable cash flows.
 
Scalable Solutions.   Our technology infrastructure and scalable solution platforms allow us to accommodate significant additional transaction volumes with limited incremental costs. This operating leverage enabled us to increase our EBITDA margins from 30.6% in 2003 to 42.1% in 2007.
 
Low Capital Intensity.   We have low capital needs that allow us to generate strong cash flow. In 2007, our operating income and capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue were 33.9% and 4.1%, respectively.
 
Our Growth Strategy
 
Over the past five years, we have grown our revenues at a CAGR of 13.8% through the successful execution of our business plan. These results reflect strong organic revenue growth, new product development and selected acquisitions. To build on our base revenue, we use our intellectual property and customer relationships to generate insight into where we may more effectively extract or apply data. We then innovate or adapt analytics that expand the range, utility and predictive capabilities of our solutions to grow our revenues profitably. We have made, and continue to make, investments in people, data sets, analytic solutions, technology, and complementary businesses.
 
To serve our customers and grow our business, we aggressively pursue the following strategies:
 
Increase Sales to Insurance Customers
 
We expect to expand the application of our solutions in insurance customers’ underwriting and claims processes. We encourage our customers to share more data with us to enhance the power of our analytics so that our customers can profit from improved risk management decisions. Building on our deep knowledge of, and embedded position in, the insurance industry, we expect to sell more solutions to existing customers tailored to specific lines of insurance. In addition, as our databases continue to grow, we believe the predictive capability of our algorithms will also improve, enhancing the value of our existing offerings and increasing demand for our solutions. By increasing the breadth and relevance of our offerings, we believe we can strengthen our relationships with customers and increase our value to their decision making in critical ways.


54


Table of Contents

Develop New, Proprietary Data Sets and Predictive Analytics
 
We work with our customers to understand their evolving needs. We plan to create new solutions by enriching our mix of proprietary data sets, analytic solutions and effective decision support across the markets we serve. Our data sets produce analytics focused on emergent risks and evolving issues within both new and current customer segments. We constantly seek to add new data that can further leverage our analytic methods, technology platforms and intellectual capital. Current areas of focus in the U.S. include commercial loss histories, detailed policy level information, vehicle-generated data, loan level mortgage data, pharmaceutical claims and healthcare claims data. We believe this strategy will spur revenue growth and improve profitability.
 
Leverage Our Intellectual Capital to Expand into Adjacent Markets and New Customer Sectors
 
Our organization is built on nearly four decades of intellectual property in risk management. We believe we can continue to profitably expand the use of our intellectual capital and apply our analytic methods in new markets, where significant opportunities for long-term growth exist. For example, we have leveraged our skills in predictive models for losses in the healthcare segment into providing predictive analytic solutions for workers’ compensation claims. In addition, we are leveraging our industry-leading solutions for detecting fraud in mortgage insurance to enhance the accuracy of our mortgage lending fraud platform. We also continue to pursue growth through targeted international expansion. We have already demonstrated the effectiveness of this strategy with our expansion into healthcare and non-insurance financial services. We believe there are numerous opportunities to repurpose our existing data assets and analytic capabilities to expand into new markets.
 
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions that Complement Our Leadership Positions
 
We will continue to expand our data and analytics capabilities across industries. While we expect this will occur primarily through organic growth, we have and will continue to acquire assets and businesses that strengthen our value proposition to customers. We primarily focus on smaller acquisitions of differentiated proprietary data that is complementary to our own, analytical applications or models that can leverage our proprietary data and businesses that address new risk markets. Our acquisitions have been, and will continue to be, primarily focused within our Decision Analytics segment. We have developed an internal capability to source, evaluate and integrate acquisitions that have created value for shareholders. We have acquired 14 businesses in the past five years, which in the aggregate have increased their revenue with a weighted average CAGR of 40% over the same period.
 
Our History
 
We trace our history to 1971, when Insurance Services Office, Inc., or ISO, started operations as a not-for-profit advisory and rating organization providing services for the U.S. P&C insurance industry. ISO was formed as an association of insurance companies to gather statistical data and other information from insurers and report to regulators, as required by law. ISO’s original functions also included developing programs to help insurers define and manage insurance products and providing information to help insurers determine their own independent premium rates. Insurers used and continue to use our offerings primarily in their product development, underwriting and rating functions. Today, those businesses form the core of our Risk Assessment segment.
 
Over the past decade, we have transformed our business beyond its original functions by deepening and broadening our data assets, developing a set of integrated risk management solutions and services and addressing new markets through our Decision Analytics segment.
 
Our expansion into analytics began when we acquired the American Insurance Services Group and certain operations and assets of the National Insurance Crime Bureau in 1997 and 1998, respectively. Those organizations brought to the company large databases of insurance claims, as well as expertise in detecting and preventing claims fraud. To further expand our Decision Analytics segment, we acquired AIR Worldwide in 2002, the technological leader in catastrophe modeling. In 2004, we entered the healthcare space by acquiring several businesses that now offer web-based analytical and reporting systems for health insurers,


55


Table of Contents

provider organizations and self-insured employers. In 2005 we entered the mortgage lending sector, acquiring the first of several businesses that now provide automated fraud detection, compliance and decision support solutions for the U.S. mortgage industry. In 2006, to bolster our position in the claims field we acquired Xactware, a leading supplier of estimating software for professionals involved in building repair and reconstruction.
 
These acquisitions have added scale, geographic reach, highly skilled workforces, and a wide array of new capabilities to our Decision Analytics segment. They have helped to make us a leading provider of information and decision analytics for customers involved in the business of risk in the U.S. and selectively around the world.
 
Our senior management operating team, which includes our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, general counsel and the three senior officers who lead our largest business units, have been with us for an average of almost twenty years. This team has led our transformation to a successful for-profit entity, focused on growth with our U.S. P&C insurer customers and expansion into a variety of new markets.
 
Services
 
Risk Assessment Segment
 
Our Risk Assessment segment serves our P&C insurance customers and focuses on the first two decision making processes in our Risk Analysis Framework: prediction of loss and selection and pricing of risk. Within this segment, we also provide solutions to help our insurance customers comply with their reporting requirements in each U.S. state in which they operate. Our customers include most of the P&C insurance providers in the United States and we have retained approximately 99% of our P&C insurance customer base within the Risk Assessment segment in each of the last five years.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, our Risk Assessment segment produced revenues of $485 million and $253 million, representing 60% and 58% of our total revenues, respectively, and EBITDA of $213 million and $114 million, representing 63% and 60% of our total EBITDA, respectively. This segment’s revenues and EBITDA have a CAGR of 7.8% and 14.3%, respectively, for the five-year period ended December 31, 2007.
 
Statistical Agent and Data Services
 
The P&C insurance industry is heavily regulated in the United States. P&C insurers have a legal responsibility to collect statistical data about their premiums and losses and to report that data to regulators in every state in which they operate. Our statistical agent services have enabled P&C insurers to meet these regulatory requirements for over 30 years. We aggregate the data and, as a licensed “statistical agent” in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, we report these statistics to insurance regulators. We are able to capture significant economies of scale given the level of penetration of this service within the U.S. P&C insurance industry.
 
To provide our customers and the regulators the information they require, we maintain one of the largest private databases in the world. Over the past four decades, we have developed core expertise in acquiring, processing, managing and operating large and comprehensive databases that are the foundation of our Risk Assessment segment. We use our proprietary technology to assemble, organize and update vast amounts of detailed information submitted by our customers. We supplement this data with publicly available information.
 
Each year, P&C insurers send us approximately 2.5 billion detailed individual records of insurance transactions, such as insurance premiums collected or losses incurred. We maintain a database of almost 14 billion statistical records, including approximately 5 billion commercial lines records and approximately 9 billion personal lines records. We collect unit-transaction detail of each premium and loss record, which enhances the validity, reliability and accuracy of our data sets and our actuarial analyses. Our proprietary quality process includes almost 2,500 separate checks to ensure that data meet our high standards of quality.


56


Table of Contents

Actuarial Services
 
We provide actuarial services to help our customers price their risks as they underwrite. We project future losses and loss expenses utilizing a broad set of data. These projections tend to be more reliable than if our customers used solely their own data. We provide loss costs by coverage, class, territory, and many other categories. Our customers can use our estimates of future loss costs in making independent decisions about the prices charged for their policies. For most P&C insurers, in most lines of business, we believe our loss costs are an essential input to rating decisions. We make a number of actuarial adjustments, including loss development and loss adjustment expenses before the data is used to estimate future loss costs. Our actuarial services are also used to create the analytics underlying our industry-standard insurance programs described below.
 
Our employees include over 200 actuarial professionals, including 39 Fellows and 21 Associates of the Casualty Actuarial Society, as well as 145 Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters, 9 Certified and 18 Associate Insurance Data Managers, 166 members of the Insurance Data Management Association and 138 professionals with advanced degrees, including PhDs in mathematics and statistical modeling who review both the data and the models.
 
Using our large database of premium and loss data, our actuaries are able to perform sophisticated analyses using our predictive models and analytic methods to help our P&C insurance customers with pricing, loss reserving, and marketing. We distribute a significant number of actuarial products and offer flexible services to meet our customers’ needs. In addition, our actuarial consultants provide customized services for our clients that include assisting them with the development of independent insurance programs, analysis of their own underwriting experience, development of classification systems and rating plans and a wide variety of other business decisions. We also supply information to a wide variety of customers in other markets including reinsurance, government agencies and real estate.
 
Industry-Standard Insurance Programs
 
We are the recognized leader in the United States for industry-standard insurance programs that help P&C insurers define coverages and issue policies. Our policy language, prospective loss cost information and policywriting rules can serve as integrated turnkey insurance programs for our customers. Insurance companies need to ensure that their policy language, rules, and rates comply with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Insurers must also make sure their policies remain competitive by promptly changing coverages in response to changes in statutes or case law. To meet their needs, we process and interface with state regulators on average over 4,000 filings each year, ensuring smooth implementation of our rules and forms. When insurers choose to develop their own alternative programs, our industry-standard insurance programs also help regulators make sure that such insurers’ policies meet basic coverage requirements.
 
Standardized coverage language, which has been tested in litigation and tailored to reflect judicial interpretation, helps to ensure consistent treatment of claimants. As a result, our industry-standard language also simplifies claim settlements and can reduce the occurrence of costly litigation, because our language causes the meaning of coverage terminology to become established and known. Our policy language includes standard coverage language, endorsements and policy writing support language that assist our customers in understanding the risks they assume and the coverages they are offering. With these policy programs, insurers also benefit from economies of scale. We have over 200 specialized lawyers and insurance experts reviewing changes in each state’s insurance rules and regulations, including on average over 11,000 legislative bills, 750 regulatory actions and 2,000 court cases per year, to make any required changes to our policy language and rating information.
 
To cover the wide variety of risks in the marketplace, we offer a broad range of policy programs. For example, in the homeowner’s line of insurance, we maintain policy language and rules for six basic coverages, 172 national endorsements, and 469 state-specific endorsements. Overall, we provide policy language, prospective loss costs, policy writing rules and a variety of other solutions for 24 lines of insurance.


57


Table of Contents

Property-Specific Rating and Underwriting Information
 
We gather information on individual properties and communities so that insurers can use our information to evaluate and price personal and commercial property insurance, as well as commercial liability insurance. Our property-specific rating and underwriting information allow our customers to understand, quantify, underwrite, mitigate and avoid potential loss for residential and commercial properties. Our database contains loss costs and other vital information on approximately 2.7 million specifically-rated and class-rated commercial buildings in the United States and also holds information on approximately 4.5 million individual businesses occupying those buildings. We have a staff of more than 600 field representatives strategically located around the United States who observe and report on conditions at commercial and residential properties, evaluate community fire-protection capabilities and assess the effectiveness of municipal building-code enforcement. Each year, our field staff visits over 350,000 commercial properties to collect information on new buildings and verify building attributes.
 
We also provide proprietary analytic measures of the ability of individual communities to mitigate losses from important perils. Nearly every property insurer in the United States uses our evaluations of community firefighting capabilities to help determine premiums for fire insurance throughout the country. We provide field-verified and validated data on the fire protection services for more than 46,000 fire response jurisdictions. We also offer services to evaluate the effectiveness of community enforcement of building codes and the efforts of communities to mitigate damage from flooding. Further, we provide information on the insurance rating territories, premium taxes, crime risk and hazards of windstorm, earthquake, wildfire and other perils. To supplement our data on specific commercial properties and individual communities, we have assembled, from a variety of internal and third-party sources, information on hazards related to geographic locations representing every postal address in the United States. Insurers use this information not only for policy quoting but also for analyzing risk concentration in geographical areas.
 
Decision Analytics Segment
 
In the Decision Analytics segment, we support all four phases of our Risk Analysis Framework. We develop predictive models to forecast scenarios and produce both standard and customized analytics that help our customers better predict loss; select and price risk; detect fraud before and after a loss event; and quantify losses.
 
(GRAPH)
 
As we develop our models to quantify loss and detect fraud, we improve our ability to predict the loss and prevent the fraud from happening. We believe this provides us with a significant competitive advantage over firms that do not offer solutions which operate both before and after loss events.


58


Table of Contents

 
For the year ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, our Decision Analytics segment produced revenues of $317 million and $184 million, representing 40% and 42% of our total revenues, respectively, and EBITDA of $125 million and $74 million, representing 37% and 40% of our total EBITDA, respectively. This segment’s revenues and EBITDA have a CAGR of 27.8% and 55.4%, respectively, for the five-year period ended December 31, 2007.
 
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 
P&C Insurance
 
We are a leading provider of fraud-detection tools for the P&C insurance industry. Our fraud solutions improve our customers’ profitability by both predicting the likelihood that fraud is occurring and detecting suspicious activity after it has occurred. When a claim is submitted, our system searches our database and returns information about other claims filed by the same individuals or businesses (either as claimants or insureds) that help our customers determine if fraud has occurred. The system searches for matches in identifying information fields, such as name, address, Social Security number, vehicle identification number, driver’s license number, tax identification number, or other parties to the loss. Our system also includes advanced name and address searching to perform intelligent searches and improve the overall quality of the matches. Information from match reports speeds payment of meritorious claims while providing a defense against fraud and can lead to denial of a claim, negotiation of a reduced award, or further investigation by the insurer or law enforcement.
 
We have a comprehensive system used by claims adjusters and investigations professionals to process claims and fight fraud. Claims databases are one of the key tools in the fight against insurance fraud. The benefits of a single all-claims database include improved efficiency in reporting data and searching for information, enhanced capabilities for detecting suspicious claims, and superior information for investigating fraudulent claims, suspicious individuals and possible fraud rings. Our database contains information on more than 575 million claims and is the world’s largest database of claims information. Insurers and other participants submit claim reports, more than 250,000 a day on average, across all categories of the U.S. P&C insurance industry.
 
We also provide a service allowing insurers to report thefts of automobiles and property, improving the chances of recovering those items; a service that helps owners and insurers recover stolen heavy construction and agricultural equipment; an expert scoring system that helps distinguish between suspicious and meritorious claims; and products that use link-analysis technology to help visualize and fight insurance fraud.
 
We have begun to expand our fraud solutions to overseas markets. We built and launched a system in Israel in 2006 that provides claims fraud detection, claims investigation support and some underwriting services to all Israeli insurers.
 
Mortgage
 
We are a leading provider of automated fraud detection, compliance and decision-support tools for the mortgage industry. Utilizing our own loan level application database combined with actual mortgage loan performance data, we have established a risk scoring system which increases our customers’ ability to detect fraud. We provide solutions that detect fraud through each step of the mortgage lifecycle and provide regulatory compliance solutions that perform instant compliance reviews of each mortgage application. Our fraud solutions can improve our customers’ profitability by predicting the likelihood that a customer account is experiencing fraud. Our solution analyzes customer transactions in real time and generates recommendations for immediate action which are critical to stopping fraud and abuse. These applications can also detect some organized fraud schemes that are too complex and well-hidden to be identified by other methods.
 
Effective fraud detection relies on pattern identification, which in turn requires us to identify, isolate and track mortgage applications through time. Histories of multiple loans, both valid and fraudulent, are required to compare a submitted loan both to actual data and heuristic analyses. For this reason, unless fraud


59


Table of Contents

detection solutions are fueled by comprehensive data, their practicality is limited. Our proprietary database contains more than 13 million current and historical loan applications collected over the past three years. This database contains data from loan applications as well as supplementary third-party data.
 
Our technology employs sophisticated models to identify patterns in the data. Our solution provides a score which predicts whether the information provided by a mortgage applicant is correct. Working with data obtained through our partnership with a credit bureau, we have demonstrated a strong correlation between fraudulent information in the application and the likelihood of both foreclosure and early payment default on loans. We believe our solution is based upon a more comprehensive set of loan level information than any other provider in the mortgage industry.
 
We also provide forensic audit services for the mortgage origination and mortgage insurance industries. Our predictive screening tools predict which defaulted loans are the most likely candidates for full audits for the purpose of detecting fraud. We then generate detailed audit reports on defaulted mortgage loans. Those reports serve as a key component of the loss mitigation strategies of mortgage loan insurers. The recent turmoil in the mortgage industry has created a period of unprecedented opportunity for growth in demand for our services, as we believe most mortgage insurers do not have the in-house capacity to respond to, and properly review, all of their defaulted loans for evidence of fraud.
 
Healthcare
 
We offer solutions that help healthcare claims payors detect fraud, abuse and overpayment. Our approach combines computer-based modeling and profiling of claims with analysis performed by clinical experts. We run our customers’ claims through our proprietary analytic system to identify potential fraud, abuse and overpayment, and then a registered nurse, physician, or other clinical specialist skilled in coding and reimbursement decisions reviews all suspect claims and billing patterns. This combination of system and human review is unique in the industry and we believe offers improved accuracy for paying claims.
 
We analyze the patterns of claims produced by individual physicians, physicians practices, hospitals, dentists and pharmacies to locate the sources of fraud. After a suspicious source of claims is identified, our real-time analytic solutions investigate each claim individually for particular violations including upcoding, multiple billings, services claimed but not rendered and billing by unlicensed providers. By finding the individual claims with the most cost-recovery potential, and also minimizing the number of false-positive indications of fraud, we enable the special investigation units of healthcare payors to efficiently control their claims costs while maintaining high levels of customer service to their insureds.
 
We also offer web-based reporting tools that let payors take definitive action to prevent overpayments or payment of fraudulent claims. The tools provide the documentation that helps to identify, investigate, and prevent abusive and fraudulent activity by providers.
 
Prediction of Loss and Selection and Pricing of Risk
 
P&C Insurance
 
We pioneered the field of probabilistic catastrophe modeling used by insurers, reinsurers and financial institutions to manage their catastrophe risk. Our models of global natural hazards, which form the basis of our solutions, enable companies to identify, quantify, and plan for the financial consequences of catastrophic events. We have developed models covering natural hazards, including hurricanes, earthquakes, winter storms, tornadoes, hailstorms and flood for potential loss events in more than 50 countries. We have also developed and introduced a probabilistic terrorism model capable of quantifying the risk in the United States from this emerging threat, which supports pricing and underwriting decisions down to the level of an individual policy.
 
Healthcare
 
We are a leading provider of healthcare business intelligence and predictive modeling. We provide analytical and reporting systems to health insurers, provider organizations and self-insured employers. Those


60


Table of Contents

organizations use our solutions to review their healthcare data, including information on claims, membership, providers and utilization, and provide cost trends, forecasts and actuarial, financial and utilization analyses.
 
For example, our solutions allow our customers to predict medical costs and improve the financing and organization of health services. Our predictive models help our customers identify high-cost cases for care- and disease-management intervention, compare providers adjusting for differences in health, predict resource use for individuals and populations, establish health-based and performance-based payments, negotiate payments and incentives, negotiate premium rates and measure return on investment.
 
We also provide our customers healthcare consulting services using complex clinical analyses to uncover reasons behind cost and utilization increases. Physicians and hospitals are adopting and acquiring new technologies, drugs and devices more rapidly than ever before. We provide financial and actuarial consulting, clinical consulting, technical and implementation services and training services to help our customers manage costs and risks to their practices.
 
We are also beginning to expand our healthcare business internationally. We have recently secured an agreement with the German government to develop a risk-adjustment methodology based on our solutions. Our diagnosis-based risk-adjustment methods and predictive modeling tools will support the German healthcare system in the improvement of quality and efficiency of care.
 
Quantification of Loss
 
P&C Insurance
 
We provide data, analytic and networking products for professionals involved in estimating all phases of building repair and reconstruction. We provide solutions for every phase of a building’s life, including:
 
  •      estimating replacement costs during the insurance underwriting process;
 
  •      quantifying the ultimate cost of repair or reconstruction of damaged or destroyed buildings;
 
  •      aiding in the settlement of insurance claims; and
 
  •      tracking the process of repair or reconstruction and facilitating communication among insurers, adjusters, contractors and policyholders.
 
To help our customers estimate replacement costs, we also provide a solution that assists contractors and insurance adjusters to estimate repairs using a patented plan-sketching program. The program allows our customers to sketch floor plans, roof plans and wall-framing plans and automatically calculates material and labor quantities for the construction of walls, floors, footings and roofs.
 
We also offer our customers access to wholesale and retail price lists, which include structural repair and restoration pricing for 466 separate economic areas in North America. We revise this information at least once per quarter and, in the aftermath of a major disaster, we can update the price lists as often as weekly to reflect rapid price changes. Our structural repair and cleaning database contains more than 11,000 unit-cost line items. For each line item such as smoke cleaning, water extraction and hazardous cleanup, we provide time and material pricing, including labor, labor productivity rates (for new construction and restoration), labor burden and overhead, material costs and equipment costs. We improve our pricing data by analyzing the actual claims experience of our customers to verify our estimates. We estimate that approximately 62% of all homeowners’ claims settled in the U.S. in 2007 used our solution. Such a large percentage of the industry’s claims leads to accurate pricing information which we believe is unmatched in the industry.
 
We also estimate industry-wide insured losses from individual catastrophic events. We report information on disasters and determine the extent and type of damage, dates of occurrence, and geographic areas affected. We define a catastrophe as an event that causes $25 million or more in direct insured losses to property and that affects a significant number of policyholders and insurers. For each catastrophe, our loss estimate represents anticipated industry-wide insurance payments for property lines of insurance covering fixed property, building contents, time-element losses, vehicles and inland marine (diverse goods and properties). We assign a serial number that allows our customers to track losses and reserves related to a single, discrete event.


61


Table of Contents

Under many reinsurance contracts and catastrophe bonds, our serial number is important for determining which losses will trigger reinsurance coverage or payment.
 
Our estimates allow our customers to set loss reserves, deploy field adjusters and verify internal company estimates. Our estimates also keep insurers, their customers, regulators, and other interested parties informed about the total costs of disasters. We also provide our customers access to daily reports on severe weather and catastrophes and we maintain a database of information on catastrophe losses in the United States since 1950.
 
Healthcare
 
Bodily injury and workers’ compensation claims present a complex array of medical, legal and occupational issues. We offer a comprehensive claims-management solution that helps our customers manage bodily injury claims, workers’ compensation claims and accident-related comparative-liability claims. We have a database of our customers’ claims histories, including detailed settlements, medical conditions, provider information and litigation issues, to help them deal with bodily injury claims. Our system also contains a library of more than 18,700 medical conditions to help our customers better understand injuries, treatments, complications and pre-existing conditions. This allows our customers to identify developing trends in claims settlements that may lead to changes in underwriting, legal and/or training practices.
 
Our database also enables our customers to track and direct their workers’ compensation cases, including evaluating the medical and occupational situation of each claimant, maintain consistency and quality in claims handling and to develop optimal return-to-work plans. In addition, we have solutions which assist our customers in better identifying and evaluating accident-related comparative liability claims. This helps our customers to manage each claim until settlement.
 
Our Customers
 
Risk Assessment Customers
 
The customers in our Risk Assessment segment include the top 100 P&C insurance providers in the United States, including AIG, Allstate, CNA, Hartford, Liberty Mutual, Nationwide, Fireman’s Fund, State Farm, Travelers and Zurich. Our statistical agent services are used by a substantial majority of P&C insurance providers in the United States to report to regulators. Our actuarial services and industry-standard insurance programs are used by the majority of insurers and reinsurers in the United States. In addition, certain agencies of the federal government, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, as well as county and state governmental agencies and organizations, use our solutions to help satisfy government needs for risk assessment and emergency response information. In 2007, our largest Risk Assessment customer accounted for 5.2% of segment revenues, and our top ten customers accounted for 27.4% of segment revenues. Please see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Customer Relationships” for more information on our relationship with our principal stockholders.
 
Decision Analytics Customers
 
In the Decision Analytics segment, we provide our P&C insurance solutions to the majority of the P&C insurers in the United States. Specifically, our claims database serves thousands of customers, representing more than 92% of the P&C insurance industry by premium volume, 26 state workers’ compensation insurance funds, 607 self-insureds, 465 third-party administrators, several state fraud bureaus, and many law-enforcement agencies involved in investigation and prosecution of insurance fraud. In addition, our catastrophe modeling solutions have been used in approximately 45% of catastrophe bond securitizations through 2007. Also, P&C insurance companies using our building and repair solutions handle over 60% of the property claims in the United States. More than 80% of insurance repair contractors and service providers in the United States and Canada with computerized estimating systems use our building and repair pricing data.
 
In the U.S. healthcare industry, our customers include numerous Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans, Kaiser Permanente and Munich Reinsurance. In 2007, our largest customer in the Decision Analytics segment


62


Table of Contents

accounted for 4.6% of segment revenues and our top ten Decision Analytics customers accounted for 17.8% of segment revenues.
 
In the U.S. mortgage industry, we have more than 1,100 customers, including Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Wachovia. We provide our solutions to 14 of the top 20 mortgage lenders and 4 of the top 6 mortgage insurers, United Guarantee, RMIC, PMI and Old Republic Insured Credit Services. We have been providing services to mortgage insurers for over 20 years.
 
Our Competitors
 
We believe no single competitor currently offers the same scope of services and market coverage we provide. The breadth of markets we serve exposes us to a broad range of competitors.
 
Risk Assessment Competitors
 
Our Risk Assessment segment operates primarily in the U.S. P&C insurance industry, where we enjoy a leading market presence. We have a number of competitors in specific lines or services.
 
We encounter competition from a number of sources, including insurers who develop internal technology and actuarial methods for proprietary insurance programs. Competitors also include other statistical agents including the National Independent Statistical Service, the Independent Statistical Service, and other advisory organizations providing underwriting rules, prospective loss costs and coverage language, such as the American Association of Insurance Services and Mutual Services Organization.
 
Competitors for our property-specific rating and underwriting information are primarily limited to a number of regional providers of commercial property inspections and surveys, including Overland Solutions, Inc. and Regional Reporting, Inc. We also compete with a variety of organizations that offer consulting services, primarily specialty technology and consulting firms. In addition, a customer may use its own internal resources rather than engage an outside firm for these services. Our competitors also include information technology product and services vendors including CDS, Inc., management and strategy consulting firms including Deloitte, and smaller specialized information technology firms and analytical services firms including Pinnacle Consulting and EMB.
 
Decision Analytics Competitors
 
In the P&C insurance claims market and catastrophe modeling market, certain products are offered by a number of companies, including, ChoicePoint (loss histories and motor vehicle records for personal lines underwriting), Explore Information Services (personal automobile underwriting) and Risk Management Solutions (catastrophe modeling). We believe that our P&C insurance industry expertise, combined with our ability to offer multiple applications, services and integrated solutions to individual customers, enhances our competitiveness against these competitors with more limited offerings. In the healthcare market, certain products are offered by a number of companies, including Computer Sciences Corporation (evaluation of bodily injury and workers’ compensation claims), Fair Isaac Corporation (workers’ compensation and healthcare claims cost containment) and Ingenix, McKesson and Medstat (healthcare predictive modeling and business intelligence). Competitive factors include application features and functions, ease of delivery and integration, ability of the provider to maintain, enhance and support the applications or services and price. In the mortgage analytics solutions market, our competitors include First American CoreLogic and DataVerify Corporation (mortgage lending fraud identification) and ComplianceEase and Mavent (mortgage regulatory compliance). We believe that none of our competitors in the mortgage analytics market offers the same expertise in fraud detection analytics or forensic audit capabilities.
 
Development of New Solutions
 
We take a market-focused team approach to developing our solutions. Our operating units are responsible for developing, reviewing and enhancing our various products and services. Our data management and production team designs and manages our processes and systems for market data procurement, proprietary


63


Table of Contents

data production and quality control. Our Enterprise Data Management, or EDM, team supports our efforts to create new information and products from available data and explores new methods of collecting data. EDM is focused on understanding and documenting business-unit and corporate data assets and data issues; sharing and combining data assets across the enterprise; creating an enterprise data strategy; facilitating research and product development; and promoting cross-enterprise communication.
 
Our software development team builds the technology used in many of our solutions. As part of our product-development process, we continually solicit feedback from our customers on the value of our products and services and the market’s needs. We have established an extensive system of customer advisory panels, which meet regularly throughout the year to help us respond effectively to the needs of our markets. In addition, we use frequent sales calls, executive visits, user group meetings, and other industry forums to gather information to match the needs of the market with our product development efforts. We also use a variety of market research techniques to enhance our understanding of our clients and the markets in which they operate.
 
We are currently funding 45 product development initiatives for new and enhanced offerings, including:
 
  •      LOCATION Analyst, a new portfolio-assessment system that uses proprietary insurance industry data, visual maps and sophisticated reporting to help insurers make better risk management decisions;
 
  •      360Value, an innovative web-based system for estimating replacement values of residential, commercial and agricultural properties; and
 
  •      Predictive models to help insurers classify, segment and price risks for a variety of lines of insurance.
 
We also add to our offerings through an active acquisition program. Since 2003, we have acquired 14 businesses, which have allowed us to enter new markets, offer new products and enhance the value of existing products with additional proprietary sources of data.
 
When we find it advantageous, we augment our proprietary data sources and systems by forming alliances with other leading information providers and technology companies and integrating their product offerings into our offerings. This approach gives our customers the opportunity to obtain the information they need from a single source and more easily integrate the information into their workflows.
 
Sales, Marketing and Customer Support
 
We sell our products and services primarily through direct interaction with our clients. We employ a three-tier sales structure that includes salespeople, product specialists and sales support. As of June 30, 2008, we had a sales force of 181 people. Within the company, several areas have sales teams that specialize in specific products and services. These specialized sales teams sell specific, highly technical product sets to targeted markets.
 
To provide account management to our largest customers, we segment the insurance market into two groups. National Accounts constitutes our 20 largest customers and Strategic Accounts includes all other insurance companies. Each market segment has its own sales team. Salespeople are responsible for our overall relationship with P&C insurance companies.
 
Salespeople participate in both customer-service and sales activities. They provide direct support, interacting frequently with assigned customers to assure a positive experience using our services. Salespeople also seek out new sales opportunities and provide support to the rest of the sales team. We believe our salespeople’s product knowledge and local presence differentiates us from our competition. Product specialists have product expertise and work with salespeople on specific opportunities for their assigned products. Both salespeople and product specialists have responsibility for identifying new sales opportunities. A team approach and a common customer relationship management system allow for effective coordination between the two groups.


64


Table of Contents

We go to market using a number of brands, including:
 
(GRAPH)
 
Sources of our Data
 
The data we use to perform our analytics and power our solutions are sourced through six different kinds of data arrangements. First, we gather data from our customers within agreements that also permit our customers to use the solutions created upon their data. These agreements remain in effect unless the data contributor chooses to opt out and represent our primary method of data gathering. It is very rare that contributors elect not to continue providing us data. Second, we have agreements with data contributors in which we specify the particular uses of their data and provide to the data contributors their required levels of privacy, protection of data and where necessary de-identification of data. These agreements represent no cost to us and generally feature a specified period of time for the data contributions and require renewal. Third, we “mine” data found inside the transactions supported by our solutions; as an example, we utilize the claims settlement data generated inside our repair cost estimating solution to improve the cost factors used in our models. Again, these arrangements represent no cost to us and we obtain the consent of our customers to make use of their data in this way. Fourth, we source data generally at no cost from public sources including federal, state and local governments. Fifth, we gather data about the physical characteristics of commercial properties through the direct observation of our field staff who also perform property surveys at the request of, and facilitated by, property insurers. Lastly, we purchase data from data aggregators under contracts that reflect prevailing market pricing for the data elements purchased, including county tax assessor records, descriptions of hazards such as flood plains and professional licenses. In all our modes of data collection, we are the owners of whatever derivative solutions we create using the data. Because of the efficiency of our data gathering methods and the lack of any cost associated with a large portion of our data, our costs to source data were 1.9% and 1.8% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
 
Information Technology
 
Technology
 
Our information technology systems are fundamental to our success. They are used for the storage, processing, access and delivery of the data which forms the foundation of our business and the development and delivery of our solutions provided to our clients. Much of the technology we use and provide to our clients is developed, maintained and supported by approximately 800 employees. We generally own or have secured ongoing rights to use for the purposes of our business all the customer-facing applications which are material to our operations. We support and implement a mix of technologies, focused on implementing the most efficient technology for any give business requirement or task.


65


Table of Contents

Customers connect to our systems using a number of different technologies, including internet, VPN, dedicated network connections, Frame Relay and Value Added Network services through vendors such as Advantis and IVANS. We utilize Computer Associates Unicenter, Hewlett Packard Insight Manager, Compuware Vantage and other best-of-breed point technologies to aggressively monitor and automate the management of our environment and applications as well as event-driven operational alerts.
 
Data Centers
 
We have two primary data centers in Jersey City, New Jersey and Orem, Utah. In addition, we have data centers dedicated to certain business units, including AIR and DxCG in Boston and AISG Claimsearch in Israel. In addition to these key data centers, we also have a number of smaller data centers located in other states.
 
Disaster Recovery
 
We are committed to a framework for business continuity management and carry out annual reviews of the state of preparedness of each business unit. All of our critical databases, systems and contracted client services are also regularly recovered. We also have documented disaster recovery plans in place for each of our major data centers and each of our solutions. Our primary data center recovery site is in New York State, approximately 50 miles northwest of Jersey City, New Jersey.
 
Security
 
We have adopted a wide range of measures to ensure the security of our IT infrastructure and data. Security measures generally cover the following key areas: physical security; logical security of the perimeter; network security such as firewalls; logical access to the operating systems; deployment of virus detection software; and appropriate policies and procedures relating to removable media such as laptops. All laptops are encrypted and media leaving our premises that is sent to a third-party storage facility is also encrypted. This commitment has led us to achieve certification from CyberTrust (an industry leader in information security certification) since 2002.
 
Intellectual Property
 
We own a significant number of intellectual property rights, including copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and patents. Specifically, our policy language, insurance manuals, software and databases are protected by both registered and common law copyrights, and the licensing of those materials to our customers for their use represents a large portion of our revenue. We also own in excess of 200 trademarks in the U.S. and foreign countries, including the names of our products and services and our logos and tag lines, many of which are registered. We believe many of our trademarks, trade names, service marks and logos to be of material importance to our business as they assist our customers in identifying our products and services and the quality that stands behind them. We consider our intellectual property to be proprietary, and we rely on a combination of statutory (e.g., copyright, trademark, trade secret and patent) and contractual safeguards in a comprehensive intellectual property enforcement program to protect them wherever they are used.
 
We also own several software method and processing patents and have several pending patent applications in the U.S. that complement our products. The patents and patent applications include claims which pertain to technology, including a patent for our Claims Outcome Advisor software, our ISO-ITS rating and policy administration software and for our Xactware Sketch product. We believe the protection of our proprietary technology is important to our success and we will continue to seek to protect those intellectual property assets for which we have expended substantial research and development capital and which are material to our business.
 
In order to maintain control of our intellectual property, we enter into license agreements with our customers, granting each customer a license to use our products and services, including our software and databases. This helps to maintain the integrity of our proprietary intellectual property and to protect the embedded information and technology contained in our solutions. As a general practice, employees,


66


Table of Contents

contractors and other parties with access to our proprietary information sign agreements that prohibit the unauthorized use or disclosure of our proprietary rights, information and technology.
 
Employees
 
As of June 30, 2008 we employed 3,290 full-time and 176 part-time employees. None of our employees are represented by unions. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good and have not experienced interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements.
 
Properties
 
Our headquarters are in Jersey City, New Jersey. As of June 30, 2008, our principal offices consisted of the following properties:
 
                 
Location
  Square Feet     Lease Expiration Date  
 
Jersey City, New Jersey
    390,991       May 21, 2021  
Orem, Utah
    68,343       January 1, 2017  
Boston, Massachusetts
    47,000       March 31, 2015  
Agoura Hills, California
    28,666       October 30, 2011  
South Jordan, Utah
    23,505       May 31, 2014  
 
We also lease offices in 15 states in the United States and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico and offices outside the United States to support our international operations in China, England, Israel, India, Japan and Germany.
 
We believe that our properties are in good operating condition and adequately serve our current business operations. We also anticipate that suitable additional or alternative space, including those under lease options, will be available at commercially reasonable terms for future expansion.
 
Regulation
 
Because our business involves the distribution of certain personal, public and non-public data to businesses and governmental entities that make eligibility, service and marketing decisions based on such data, certain of our solutions and services are subject to regulation under federal, state and local laws in the United States and, to a lesser extent, foreign countries. Examples of such regulation include the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which regulates the use of consumer credit report information; the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which regulates the use of non-public personal financial information held by financial institutions and applies indirectly to companies that provide services to financial institutions; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, which restricts the public disclosure of patient information and applies indirectly to companies that provide services to healthcare businesses; the Drivers Privacy Protection Act, which prohibits the public disclosure, use or resale by any state’s department of motor vehicles of personal information about an individual that was obtained by the department in connection with a motor vehicle record, except for a “permissible purpose” and various other federal, state and local laws and regulations.
 
These laws generally restrict the use and disclosure of personal information and provide consumers certain rights to know the manner in which their personal information is being used, to challenge the accuracy of such information and/or to prevent the use and disclosure of such information. In certain instances, these laws also impose requirements for safeguarding personal information through the issuance of data security standards or guidelines. Certain state laws impose similar privacy obligations, as well as obligations to provide notification of security breaches in certain circumstances.
 
We are also licensed as a rating, rate service, advisory or statistical organization under state insurance codes in all fifty states, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands and the District of Columbia. As such an advisory organization, we provide statistical, actuarial, policy language development and related products and services to property/casualty insurers, including advisory prospective loss costs, other prospective cost information, manual rules and policy language. We also serve as an officially designated statistical agent of


67


Table of Contents

state insurance regulators to collect policy-writing and loss statistics of individual insurers and compile that information into reports used by the regulators.
 
Many of our products, services and operations as well as insurer use of our services are subject to state rather than federal regulation by virtue of the McCarran-Ferguson Act. As a result, many of our operations and products are subject to review and/or approval by state regulators. Furthermore, our operations involving licensed advisory organization activities are subject to periodic examinations conducted by state regulators and our operations and products are subject to state antitrust and trade practice statutes within or outside state insurance codes, which are typically enforced by state attorneys general and/or insurance regulators.
 
Legal Proceedings
 
We are a party to legal proceedings with respect to a variety of matters in the ordinary course of business. Except as described below, we do not believe that any legal proceedings to which we are a party would have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. Although we believe that we have strong defenses for the proceedings described below, we could in the future incur judgments or fines or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
 
Claims Outcome Advisor Litigation
 
Hensley, et al. v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al. is a putative nationwide class action complaint, filed in February 2005, in Miller County, Arkansas state court. Defendants include numerous insurance companies and providers of software products used by insurers in paying claims. We are among the named defendants. Plaintiffs allege that certain software products, including our Claims Outcome Advisor product and a competing software product sold by Computer Sciences Corporation, improperly estimated the amount to be paid by insurers to their policyholders in connection with claims for bodily injuries. On August 18, 2008, we were voluntarily dismissed from the case with prejudice.
 
We have entered into settlement agreements with plaintiffs asserting claims relating to the use of Claims Outcome Advisor by defendants Hanover Insurance Group, Progressive Car Insurance, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group. Each of these settlements has been granted final approval by the court and together they resolve the claims asserted in this case against us with respect to the above insurance companies, who settled the claims against them as well. A provision was recorded in 2006 for this proceeding and the total amount we paid in 2008 with respect to these settlements was less than $2 million. A fourth defendant, The Automobile Club of California, that is alleged to have used Claims Outcome Advisor has not settled. Plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss us from the case with prejudice once a discovery dispute relating to certain documents is resolved.
 
Xactware Litigation
 
The following two lawsuits have been filed by or on behalf of groups of Louisiana insurance policyholders who claim, among other things, that certain insurers who used products and price information supplied by our Xactware subsidiary (and those of another provider) did not fully compensate policyholders for property damage covered under their insurance policies. The plaintiffs seek to recover compensation for their damages in an amount equal to the difference between the amount paid by the defendants and the fair market repair/restoration costs of their damaged property.
 
Schafer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. , et al. is a putative class action pending against us and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company filed in March 2007 in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaint alleged antitrust violations, breach of contract, negligence, bad faith, and fraud. The court dismissed the antitrust claim as to both defendants and dismissed all claims against us other than fraud, which will proceed to the discovery phase along with the remaining claims against State Farm. Plaintiffs have moved to certify a class with respect to the fraud and breach of contract claims which the defendants will oppose.


68


Table of Contents

 
Mornay v. Travelers Ins. Co. , et al. is a putative class action pending against us and Travelers Insurance Company filed in November 2007 in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaint alleged antitrust violations, breach of contract, negligence, bad faith, and fraud. As in Schafer, the court dismissed the antitrust claim as to both defendants and dismissed all claims against us other than fraud. The court has stayed the proceedings pending an appraisal of the lead plaintiffs’ insurance claims.
 
The third lawsuit, Louisiana ex rel. Foti v. Allstate Ins. Co. , is a putative parens patriae action filed by the Louisiana Attorney General in November 2007 in Louisiana state court against numerous insurance companies, the Company, and other solution providers, and consultants. The complaint contains allegations of an antitrust conspiracy among the defendants with respect to the payment of insurance claims for property damage and seeks the forfeiture of any illegal profits and treble damages. Defendants removed the case to the Eastern District of Louisiana. A motion to remand the case to state court was denied by the district court. That decision was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss and plaintiffs are opposing the motion.
 
At this time it is not possible to determine the ultimate resolution of, or estimate the liability related to, these matters. No provision for losses has been provided in connection with the Xactware litigation.
 
iiX Litigation
 
In March 2007, our Insurance Information Exchange, or iiX, subsidiary, as well as other information providers and insurers in the State of Texas, were served with a summons and class action complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging violations of the Driver Privacy Protection Act, or the DPPA. Plaintiffs brought the action on their own behalf and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals whose personal information is contained in any motor vehicle record maintained by the State of Texas and who have not provided express consent to the State of Texas for the distribution of their personal information for purposes not enumerated by the DPPA and whose personal information has been knowingly obtained and used by the defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants knowingly obtained such personal information and that the obtaining and use of this personal information was not for a purpose authorized by the DPPA. The complaint seeks liquidated damages in the amount of $2,500 for each instance of a violation of DPPA, punitive damages and the destruction of any illegally obtained personal information. We have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on failure to state a claim and lack of standing and a decision on that motion is pending.


69


Table of Contents

 
MANAGEMENT
 
Executive Officers and Directors
 
The following table sets forth information regarding the executive officers and directors of the Company, as of June 30, 2008:
 
             
Name
 
Age
 
Position
 
Frank J. Coyne
    59     Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer
Scott G. Stephenson
    51     Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mark V. Anquillare
    42     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth E. Thompson
    48     Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Carole J. Banfield
    68     Executive Vice President — Information Services and Government Relations
Vincent Cialdella
    57     Senior Vice President — AISG
Kevin B. Thompson
    57     Senior Vice President — Insurance Services
J. Hyatt Brown
    71     Director
Glen A. Dell
    72     Director
Henry J. Feinberg
    56     Director
Christopher M. Foskett
    51     Director
Constantine P. Iordanou
    58     Director
John F. Lehman, Jr. 
    66     Director
Stephen W. Lilienthal
    58     Director
Samuel G. Liss
    52     Director
Andrew G. Mills
    55     Director
Arthur J. Rothkopf
    73     Director
Barbara D. Stewart
    65     Director
David B. Wright
    59     Director
 
A brief biography of each executive officer and director follows.
 
Executive Officers
 
Frank J. Coyne has been our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer since 2002. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Coyne served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and he served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2000. Mr. Coyne joined the Company from Kemper Insurance Cos. where he was Executive Vice President Specialty and Risk Management Groups. Previously, he served in a variety of positions with General Accident Insurance, and was elected its President and Chief Operating Officer in 1991. He has also held executive positions with Lynn Insurance Group, Reliance Insurance Co. and PMA Insurance Co.
 
Scott G. Stephenson has been our Chief Operating Officer since June 2008 and leader of our Decision Analytics segment. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Stephenson served as our Executive Vice President and he served as President of our Intego Solutions business from 2001 to 2002. Mr. Stephenson joined the Company from Silver Lake Partners, a technology-oriented private equity firm, where he was an executive-in-residence from 1999 to 2001. From 1989 to 1999 Mr. Stephenson was a partner with The Boston Consulting Group, eventually rising to senior partner and member of the firm’s North American operating committee.
 
Mark V. Anquillare has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2007. Mr. Anquillare joined the Company as Director of Financial Systems in 1992 and since joining the Company,


70


Table of Contents

Mr. Anquillare has held various management positions, including Assistant Vice President, Vice President and Controller and Senior Vice President and Controller. Prior to 1992, Mr. Anquillare was employed by the Prudential Insurance Company of America. Mr. Anquillare is a Fellow of the Life Management Institute.
 
Kenneth E. Thompson has been our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since 2006. Prior to joining the Company in 2006, Mr. Thompson was a partner of McCarter & English, LLP from 1997 to 2006. Mr. Thompson also serves on the board of directors of Measurement Specialties, Inc.
 
Carole J. Banfield has been our Executive Vice President Information Services and Government Relations Department focused on our Risk Assessment segment since 1996. Ms. Banfield joined the Company in 1970 as an assistant actuary in the Homeowners Actuarial Division and since 1977 has held various management positions, including Vice President Government and Industry Relations. Ms. Banfield began her career with the National Bureau of Casualty Underwriters in 1962. Ms. Banfield is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries and an Associate of the Casualty Actuarial Society. She currently serves on the board of directors of the American Society of Workers’ Compensation Professionals, the Insurance Data Management Association and on the Industry Advisory Group of ACORD.
 
Vincent Cialdella has been our Senior Vice President, AISG since April 2008 in our Decision Analytics segment. Prior to April 2008, Mr. Cialdella served as Vice President of ISO Claims Solutions, a division of AISG, since 2000. Mr. Cialdella’s career at the Company spans approximately thirty years, during which he has served as Assistant Vice President of Software Products, Corporate Systems and Application Development Support Center.
 
Kevin B. Thompson has been our Senior Vice President, Insurance Services since 2003 focused on our Risk Assessment segment. Mr. Thompson joined the Company in 1974 and has held various management positions, including Vice President, Insurance Services, Vice President, Personal and Standard Commercial Lines, Vice President, Standard Commercial Lines, Assistant Vice President, Commercial Casualty Actuarial. Mr. Thompson is also a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries and Fellow of the Casualty Actuarial Society. From 1996 to 1999 he served as Vice President - Admissions of the Casualty Actuarial Society and as a Member of the Board of Directors from 1994 to 1996.
 
Class A Directors
 
Christopher M. Foskett has served as one of our directors since 1999. Mr. Foskett is a Managing Director and Global Head of the Financial Institutions Group in Citigroup’s Corporate Bank since 2007. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. Foskett was Head of Sales and Relationship Management for Citigroup Global Transaction Services. He also served as Global Industry Head for the Insurance and Investment Industries in Citigroup’s Global Corporate Bank from 1999 to 2003. Previously, he held various roles in Citigroup’s mergers and acquisitions group.
 
David B. Wright has served as one of our directors since 1999. Mr. Wright has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Verari Systems since 2006. Before joining Verari Systems, he was Executive Vice President, Office of the CEO, Strategic Alliances and Global Accounts of EMC Corporation from 2004 to 2006. Between 2001 and 2004 he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Legato Systems and from 1997 to 2000 Mr. Wright was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Amdahl Corporation. Mr. Wright is also a director on the board of VA Software and ActiveIdentity.
 
John F. Lehman, Jr. has served as one of our directors since 1995. Mr. Lehman is Chairman of J. F. Lehman & Co., an investment firm that he founded in 1991. Prior to founding J. F. Lehman & Co., he was Managing Director of Paine Webber, Inc. from 1988 to 1991. In 1981, Mr. Lehman was appointed Secretary of the Navy by President Reagan and served in that capacity until 1987. Mr. Lehman was a member of the bipartisan September 11 Commission and serves on the board of directors of Ball Corp., EnerSys, Inc., Hawaii Superferry Inc., Atlantic Marine, Oao Technology Solutions Inc. and Special Devices, Incorporated.
 
Andrew G. Mills has served as one of our directors since 2002. Mr. Mills has been President of The King’s College in New York, NY since 2007. He is the former Chairman of Intego Solutions LLC, which he founded in 2000. Mr. Mills previously served as Chief Executive Officer of The Thomson Corporation’s


71


Table of Contents

Financial and Professional Publishing unit and as a member of Thomson’s board of directors. In 1984, he lead the start-up operations of Business Research Corporation and was responsible for overseeing its sale and integration into The Thompson Corporation. He began his career with Courtaulds Ltd. and joined The Boston Consulting Group in 1979. Mr. Mills is on the board of directors of The King’s College, Lexington Christian Academy, Camp of the Woods and Hope Christian Church, and is a member of the Massachusetts State Board of the Salvation Army.
 
Arthur J. Rothkopf has served as one of our directors since 1993. Mr. Rothkopf has served as Senior Vice President and Counselor to the President of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce since July of 2005. From 1993 to 2005, Mr. Rothkopf was President of Lafayette College in Easton, Pennsylvania. Prior to serving as President of Lafayette College, Mr. Rothkopf was General Counsel and Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, appointed by President George H. W. Bush. From 1967 through 1991, he practiced law with the Washington, D.C., firm of Hogan & Hartson, where he was a senior partner. Mr. Rothkopf is a Trustee of American University in Washington D.C.
 
J. Hyatt Brown has served as one of our directors since 2003. Mr. Brown has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brown & Brown, Inc. since 1993. Mr. Brown is a Trustee of Stetson University in Florida, a past member of the Florida Board of Regents and a member of the Florida Council of 100. He was elected to the Florida House of Representatives in 1972 and was elected Speaker in 1978. Mr. Brown retired as Speaker in 1980. He also serves on the board of directors of Rock-Tenn Company, the FPL Group Inc. and the Daytona International Speedway Corporation.
 
Glen A. Dell has served as one of our directors since 1995. Mr. Dell is a retired Partner of MapleWood Equity Partners LP. Mr. Dell served as a Partner of MapleWood Equity Partners LP from 1998 to 2007. From 1992 to 1997, Mr. Dell served as President of Investcorp Management Services Inc., where he was responsible for post-acquisition management of Investcorp’s portfolio of companies in North America. He has also served as a consultant, specializing in interim management services, and held executive positions with General Electric Co., International Paper Co., and JWT Group, Inc. Mr. Dell was a member of the board of directors of Parts Depot, Inc. until February 28, 2008.
 
Henry J. Feinberg has served as one of our directors since 1996. Since 2000, Mr. Feinberg has been a Partner of Technology Crossover Ventures, a private equity and venture capital firm. Previously, Mr. Feinberg was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rand McNally & Company. Mr. Feinberg is also a director of Adknowledge, Inc., CosmoCom, Inc., eLoyalty Corporation, FXall and Yield Management Services Ltd.
 
Barbara D. Stewart has served as one of our directors since 1995. Ms. Stewart has been President of Stewart Economics, Inc., a consulting firm that specializes in the insurance business and its regulation, since 1981. Before forming Stewart Economics, Ms. Stewart was Corporate Economist of the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies. Ms. Stewart is also a director of The Main Street America Group; a former director of Capital Re Corporation; a former overseer of The School of Risk Management, Insurance, and Actuarial Science of St. John’s University; and a member of the Editorial Board of Risk Management and Insurance Review .
 
Class B Directors
 
Constantine P. Iordanou has served as one of our directors since 2001. Mr. Iordanou has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Arch Capital Group Limited, or ACGL, since August 2003 and as director of ACGL since January 2002. From January 2002 through July 2003, he was Chief Executive Officer of Arch Capital (U.S.) Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ACGL. Prior to joining ACGL in 2002, Mr. Iordanou served in various capacities for Zurich Financial Services and its affiliates, including as Senior Executive Vice President of Group Operations and Business Development of Zurich Financial Services, President of Zurich-American Specialties Division, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer of Zurich American and Chief Executive Officer of Zurich North America. Prior to joining Zurich in March of 1992, he served as President of the Commercial Casualty division of the Berkshire Hathaway Group and


72


Table of Contents

served as Senior Vice President with the American Home Insurance Company, a member of the American International Group.
 
Samuel G. Liss has served as one of our directors since 2005. Mr. Liss has been Executive Vice President at The Travelers Companies since 2004. Before the merger of The St. Paul and Travelers Companies, Mr. Liss served as Executive Vice President at The St. Paul from February 2003 to April 2004. From 1994 to 2001, Mr. Liss was a Managing Director at Credit Suisse First Boston, or CSFB, initially focused on equity research across a range of financial institution sectors and subsequently serving in a Senior Investment Banking relationship, advisory and execution role in CSFB’s Financial Institutions Group, including leadership of its asset management industry practice. Mr. Liss was a senior equity analyst at Salomon Brothers from 1980 to 1994.
 
Stephen W. Lilienthal has served as one of our directors since 2008. Mr. Lilienthal has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation, or CNA, and its insurance subsidiaries since August 2002. Prior to that time, he was President and Chief Executive Officer, Property and Casualty Operations of the CNA insurance companies. He is a member of the Executive and Finance Committees of CNA and has been a director of CNA since August of 2001. Mr. Lilienthal is also a director of American Institute for Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters, After School Matters, Northwestern Memorial Foundation, World Business Chicago, The Executives’ Club of Chicago and Boys and Girls Clubs of Chicago.
 
Board Composition
 
The number of directors will be fixed by our board of directors, subject to the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. From the date of this prospectus until the earlier of (a) the 30-month anniversary of the date of this prospectus or (b) the date on which there are no shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding, our board of directors will consist of between 11 and 13 directors, and will be comprised as follows:
 
  •      between eight to ten Class A directors; and
 
  •      three Class B directors.
 
See “Description of Capital Stock — Anti-Takeover Effects of Delaware Law — Staggered Boards.”
 
Director Independence
 
Our board of directors currently consists of 13 directors, 12 of which are “independent” as defined under applicable listing rules. Currently, the following individuals serve on our board of directors as independent directors: J. Hyatt Brown, Glen A. Dell, Henry J. Feinberg, Christopher M. Foskett, Constantine P. Iordanou, John F. Lehman, Jr., Stephen W. Lilienthal, Samuel G. Liss, Andrew G. Mills, Arthur J. Rothkopf, Barbara D. Stewart and David B. Wright.
 
Board Committees
 
Our by-laws provide that the board of directors may designate one or more committees. We currently have the following committees: Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Finance and Investment Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
 
The Executive Committee currently consists of Frank J. Coyne (Chair), Glen A. Dell, Constantine P. Iordanou, John F. Lehman, Jr. and Arthur J. Rothkopf. The Executive Committee exercises all the power and authority of the board of directors (except those powers and authorities that are reserved to the full board of directors under Delaware law) between regularly scheduled board of directors meetings. The Executive Committee also makes recommendations to the full board of directors on various matters. The Executive Committee meets as necessary upon the call of the chairman of the board of directors.
 
The Audit Committee currently consists of Arthur J. Rothkopf (Chair), Henry J. Feinberg, Christopher M. Foskett, Andrew G. Mills and Barbara D. Stewart, all of whom are “independent” as defined under


73


Table of Contents

applicable listing rules. Each member of our Audit Committee is financially literate, as such term is interpreted by our board of directors. Ms. Barbara D. Stewart is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The Audit Committee reviews and, as it deems appropriate, recommends to the board of directors the internal accounting and financial controls for the Company and the accounting principles and auditing practices and procedures to be employed in preparation and review of the financial statements of the Company. The Audit Committee also provides assistance to our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Audit Committee also makes recommendations to the board of directors concerning the engagement of the independent accounting firm and the scope of the audit to be undertaken by such auditors.
 
The Compensation Committee currently consists of John F. Lehman, Jr. (Chair), Glen A. Dell, Constantine P. Iordanou and David B. Wright, all of whom are “independent” as defined under applicable listing rules. The Compensation Committee reviews and, as it deems appropriate, recommends to the board of directors policies, practices and procedures relating to the compensation of the officers and other managerial employees and the establishment and administration of employee benefit plans. The Compensation Committee also exercises all authority under the Company’s employee equity incentive plans and advises and consults with the officers of the Company as may be requested regarding managerial personnel policies.
 
The Finance and Investment Committee currently consists of Glen A. Dell (Chair), Frank J. Coyne, Henry J. Feinberg, Christopher M. Foskett and John F. Lehman, Jr. The Finance and Investment Committee meets annually and at such other times as necessary to establish, monitor and evaluate the Company’s investment policies, practices and advisors, and to advise management and the board of directors on the financial aspects of strategic and operational directions, including financial plans, capital planning, financing alternatives, and acquisition opportunities.
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Constantine P. Iordanou (Chair), Frank J. Coyne, Arthur J. Rothkopf and David B. Wright. Mr. Constantine P. Iordanou, Arthur J. Rothkopf and David B. Wright are “independent” as defined under applicable listing rules. Following this offering, we expect that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be comprised of independent directors in accordance with applicable requirements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and, as it deems appropriate, recommends to the board of directors policies and procedures relating to director and board of directors committee nominations and corporate governance policies.
 
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
 
Our board of directors has established a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our employees, agents, independent contractors, consultants, officers and directors. Any waiver of the code of business conduct and ethics may be made only by our board of directors and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or stock exchange regulations. The board of directors has not granted any waivers to the code of business conduct and ethics.
 
Corporate Governance Guidelines
 
Our board of directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines that comply with the applicable listing requirements and the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
 
No member of the Compensation Committee is a current or former officer of the Company or any of our subsidiaries. In addition, there are no compensation committee interlocks with the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company.


74


Table of Contents

Directors’ Compensation and Benefits
 
Annual Retainer.   Effective June 1, 2007, each non-employee director receives a retainer fee of $50,000 per year for membership on the board of directors. Each non-employee director who chairs a committee receives an additional $5,000 retainer fee, with the exception of the chairpersons of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, each of whom receives an additional $12,500 annual retainer fee.
 
Each non-employee director may elect to receive his or her annual retainer in the form of (i) cash, (ii) deferred cash, (iii) shares of Class A common stock, (iv) deferred shares of Class A common stock, (v) options to purchase Class A common stock or (vi) a combination of (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v), except that not more than 50% of the Annual Retainer may be paid in cash.
 
Meeting Attendance Fees.   Each non-employee director receives a $1,500 fee for each board of directors or Committee meeting attended in person. Meeting attendance fees are payable only in cash or deferred cash.
 
Stock Option Grants.   Effective as of the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director receives an annual option grant having a Black-Scholes value of $125,000. The initial awarding of such options is being phased in over a period of three years, so that, from 2007 through 2009, each non-employee director receives (or received) the initial grant in the year he or she is (or was) re-elected. Such options, and any portion of the Annual Retainer Fees elected to be taken as options, are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant (subject to earlier termination if the individual ceases to be a director of the Company), vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Class A common stock on the date of grant. Prior to the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director was granted an option to purchase 1,500 shares of Class A common stock every three years upon his or her re-election to the Board.
 
Employee-directors receive no additional compensation for service on the board of directors. Mr. Frank J. Coyne is the only employee-director.
 
The table below shows compensation paid to or earned by the directors during 2007. As noted above, directors may elect to receive compensation in various forms other than cash. Also, prior to 2007, directors received stock option grants every three years upon their re-election to the board. We are required to report equity awards based on accounting expense. The amounts shown for each director are not uniform because accounting expense will differ in part depending on how each director elected to receive his or her compensation and the years in which they were re-elected to the board.
 
                                 
    Fees Earned or
    Stock Awards
    Option Awards
    Total
 
Name
  Paid in Cash ($)     ($)(1)     ($)(1)     ($)  
 
Joseph A. Brandon(2)
    7,500       25,080       52,271       84,851  
J. Hyatt Brown(3)
    32,500       25,080       97,725       155,305  
Glen A. Dell(4)
    10,500             152,725       163,225  
Henry J. Feinberg(5)
    10,500             147,725       158,225  
Christopher M. Foskett(6)
    31,000       12,540             43,540  
Constantine Iordanou(7)
                117,500       117,500  
John F. Lehman, Jr.(8)
                125,000       125,000  
Samuel G. Liss(9)
    32,000             149,996       181,996  
Andrew G. Mills(10)
    4,500             112,500       117,000  
Arthur J. Rothkopf(11)
    9,000       62,700       62,500       134,200  
Barbara D. Stewart(12)
    9,000             97,725       106,725  
David B. Wright(13)
    9,000       50,160       27,271       86,431  
 
(1) For a discussion of the assumptions used to calculate the amounts shown in the option awards and stock awards columns, see note 2(j) of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included as part of this prospectus.


75


Table of Contents

 
(2) Mr. Brandon received options during 2007 with a fair value of $25,000, and stock awards with a fair value of $25,080. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Brandon owned options covering 3,635 shares. The amount shown in the option column above includes expense amounts recognized, under FAS 123R, in 2007 relating to option grants made in 2006.
 
(3) Mr. Brown received stock awards during 2007 with a fair value of $25,080. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Brown owned options covering 3,000 shares. The amount shown in the option column above includes expense amounts recognized, under FAS 123R, in 2007 relating to option grants made in 2006.
 
(4) Mr. Dell received options during 2007 with a fair value of $55,000. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Dell owned options covering 1,724 shares. The amount shown in the option column above includes expense amounts recognized, under FAS 123R, in 2007 relating to option grants made in 2006.
 
(5) Mr. Feinberg received options during 2007 with a fair value of $50,000. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Feinberg owned options covering 3,739 shares. The amount shown in the option column above includes expense amounts recognized, under FAS 123R, in 2007 relating to option grants made in 2006.
 
(6) Mr. Foskett received stock awards during 2007 with a fair value of $12,540. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Foskett owned 47 stock awards and options covering 1,000 shares.
 
(7) Mr. Iordanou received options during 2007 with a fair value of $117,500. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Iordanou owned options covering 8,796 shares.
 
(8) Mr. Lehman received options during 2007 with a fair value of $125,000. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Lehman owned options covering 2,517 shares.
 
(9) Mr. Liss received options during 2007 with a fair value of $25,000. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Liss owned options covering 1,870 shares. The amount shown in the option column above includes expense amounts recognized, under FAS 123R, in 2007 relating to option grants made in 2006.
 
(10) Mr. Mills received options during 2007 with a fair value of $112,500. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Mills owned options covering 5,608 shares.
 
(11) Mr. Rothkopf received options during 2007 with a fair value of $62,500, and stock awards with a fair value of $62,700. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Rothkopf owned options covering 2,021 shares.
 
(12) As of December 31, 2007, Ms. Stewart owned 1,142 stock awards and options covering 1,500 shares. The amount shown in the option column above includes expense amounts recognized, under FAS 123R, in 2007 relating to option grants made in 2006.
 
(13) Mr. Wright received stock awards during 2007 with a fair value of $50,160. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Wright owned options covering 3,642 shares. The amount shown in the option column above includes expense amounts recognized, under FAS 123R, in 2007 relating to option grants made in 2006.
 
Where no information is given as to a particular type of award with respect to any individual, such individual did not hold or receive such an award during or as of the end of the last fiscal year, as the case may be.
 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
 
Our business requires a highly skilled work force. While the capital intensity of our business is low, our human capital requirements are great. As noted elsewhere in this prospectus, our business depends on our senior leadership team, who possess business and technical capabilities that would be difficult, and costly, to replace. We have designed our compensation program to address these needs.
 
This section discusses the principles underlying our policies and decisions relating to the compensation of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and our other three most highly compensated executive officers. This information describes the manner and context in which compensation is earned by and awarded to these Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, and provides perspective on the tables and narrative that follow.


76


Table of Contents

Compensation Program Objectives
 
We believe the compensation program for our NEOs must attract, reward, motivate and retain the highly-qualified individuals we need to plan and execute our business strategy. We believe the program motivates managers by directly linking a portion of compensation both to the Company’s performance and the individual’s performance. To foster this direct link, we have designed our program so that a significant percentage of a NEO’s compensation is variable rather than fixed. This percentage increases with seniority, because we believe that the decisions of more senior managers have a greater impact on our performance.
 
Executives will earn variable compensation (cash awards and stock options) only if warranted by Company and individual performance. Variable compensation for our NEOs consists of an annual cash payment pursuant to our Short Term Incentive, or STI, program and a long-term equity incentive award pursuant to our Long Term Incentive, or LTI, program. We believe the design of our compensation program effectively encourages our senior managers to act in a manner that benefits the Company by creating long-term value for our stockholders.
 
Elements of the Company’s Compensation Program
 
We currently provide the following elements of compensation to our NEOs:
 
  •      base salary;
 
  •      annual cash incentive awards;
 
  •      long-term equity incentive awards; and
 
  •      health, welfare and retirement plans.
 
Each compensation element fulfills one or more of our compensation program objectives.
 
Base Salary
 
We pay base salaries to attract, reward and retain managers, and so that in recruiting and retaining senior executives we are not disadvantaged by being seen as offering a lower level of fixed compensation for a given position level. We review salaries annually to maintain competitive market levels, which are based on the experience and scope of responsibilities of each NEO. We perform our own analysis of prevailing market levels of salary for comparable positions, relying on our general knowledge of the industry, anecdotal evidence gained in the hiring and termination process and, when available, commercially prepared market surveys. Also, as noted below, for 2007 we were assisted in this analysis by our consultant, Frederic W. Cook. The base salary of our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, is determined by the Compensation Committee. The base salary of each of our other NEOs is determined by the CEO, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee. Base salary as a percentage of total compensation differs based on an executive’s position and function. Generally, executives with the highest position and level of responsibility, and thus the greatest ability to influence our performance through their decision making, have the smallest percentage of their total compensation fixed as salary. We have historically placed greater emphasis on the incentivizing potential of variable compensation; for this reason we have generally maintained salaries at a level that we believe is below the prevailing range for similar positions.
 
Annual Cash Incentive Awards
 
At the conclusion of each year, the Compensation Committee establishes performance goals for the coming year under our STI program. The specified performance goals relate to growth in revenue and EBITDA margin, and are derived from our strategic and business growth plan. We selected revenue growth and EBITDA margin growth as the criteria for STI because we believe our business’s ability to generate recurring revenue and positive cash flow is the key indicator of the successful execution of our business strategy. For 2007, the Compensation Committee established these growth targets at 10% and 28% respectively, with each factor having equal weight. Minimum thresholds were set at 6% and 25%, respectively, and maximum levels at 15% and 35%, respectively. In addition to these pre-determined revenue growth and


77


Table of Contents

EBITDA margin goals, the Compensation Committee evaluates the accomplishment during the year of other financial and nonfinancial performance measures that we believe position the Company to achieve long-term future growth. These include enhancements to productivity, achievement of new sales, accomplishment of strategic and operational initiatives and completion of acquisitions and strategic relationships. The Compensation Committee has discretion to increase or decrease the size of the STI pool to account for specific considerations applicable to a particular year.
 
Funding of the STI pool is determined by the Compensation Committee, taking into account the recommendation of the CEO, at the conclusion of the performance year based on the degree to which goals are achieved during the year.
 
Within the STI pool, awards are made for each NEO based upon a subjective review of each individual’s performance for the year. Targets for STI awards are expressed as a percentage of base salary, which percentage differs based on an executive’s position and function. There is discretion to pay an individual above or below their target STI award based on the assessment of that individual’s performance. Such discretion might be used, for example, to recognize extraordinary performance achievement or to take into account unforeseen events, such as systemic economic conditions that may influence business results. See “Analysis of 2007 Variable Compensation” for a discussion of how we determined 2007 STI. The STI award for our CEO is determined by the Compensation Committee. The STI awards for each of our other NEOs are determined by the CEO, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee. Awards under the STI plan are in the form of cash payments. Cash STI awards are paid in March, in respect of performance for the prior year.
 
Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
 
Awards under the LTI plan are generally in the form of option grants. The LTI plan also permits us to grant restricted stock awards, however that has not been our practice because we believe options provide a more effective incentive to increase the value of the Company. Also, our Employee Stock Ownership Plan, or ESOP, described below under “— Health, Welfare and Retirement Plans,” has enabled us to grant interests in our stock to our executives, also providing a directional, less highly leveraged incentive to increase share value.
 
The number of shares underlying an option grant under the LTI program is determined by a grant date value of the option award using a Black-Scholes formula. The target award value for each executive is expressed as a percentage of base salary, and is subject to the achievement of Company and individual performance goals, in the same way as for STI discussed above.
 
In general, option awards under the LTI plan are made in March, and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant, which is determined pursuant to the most recently conducted appraisal performed in connection with our ESOP.
 
Our practice has been to award Mr. Frank J. Coyne option grants under the LTI plan at irregular intervals. Certain of Mr. Coyne’s options have been granted at an exercise price above the then-current fair market value of our Class A common stock. Mr. Coyne’s last option award was in 2005. We anticipate that after the completion of this offering, Mr. Coyne will be considered for option awards annually, with an exercise price at the then-current fair market value of our shares, in the same manner as other NEOs. Mr. Mark V. Anquillare was named Chief Financial Officer in March 2007, and received an additional option award on June 30, 2007 in connection with that appointment.
 
Analysis of 2007 Variable Compensation
 
The Compensation Committee established the 2007 funding levels for the STI and LTI award pools by assessing the actual revenue growth and EBITDA margin growth for the year, and evaluating the other financial and nonfinancial performance factors described below that we believe position the Company to achieve sustainable long-term growth. For 2007, the Company’s revenue growth was slightly (approximately 5%) below target level, while EBITDA margin growth exceeded target objectives (approximately 140%). In


78


Table of Contents

evaluating these results, we also recognized the challenging conditions in the mortgage market, and the softening conditions in the property and casualty markets affecting our core operations. We believe the Company achieved excellent results in difficult conditions, and therefore established the STI pool (total payouts to all employees eligible to participate) at 84% of the maximum STI amount and established the LTI pool at 76% of the maximum LTI amount. The LTI pool was funded at a lower level because there are fewer eligible employees participating the LTI pool and the CEO, as discussed below did not receive an LTI award in 2008.
 
For the individual NEO’s, other than Mr. Coyne, the Compensation Committee considered the additional factors described below in reaching their STI amounts. The factors noted were not given any specific weights, but were rather the basis on which the Compensation Committee exercised its judgment to determine the STI awards.
 
Mr. Stephenson: the improvement in focus on our strategic initiatives and leadership in our business development initiatives.
 
Mr. Anquillare: the strong performance Mr. Anquillare rendered in assuming the new role of CFO and increasing efficiency in the performance of our financial reporting and oversight functions.
 
Mr. Thompson: the achievement of improved corporate governance and leadership in assuming responsibility for management of our Internal Audit and Human Resource divisions.
 
In the case of Mr. Boehning, who retired shortly following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee awarded him an amount that reflected his service to the Company since its inception.
 
Mr. Geraghty’s employment terminated effective March 8, 2007 and he received no STI award for 2007.
 
The 2007 STI award to Mr. Coyne was determined based upon the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of Company performance, and recognized the strong EBITDA margin growth achieved by the Company, as well as the revenue performance discussed above. Mr. Coyne did not receive an LTI award, due to our prior practice of making LTI awards to the CEO at irregular intervals.
 
The LTI awards to each of the other NEOs were based on the Company’s performance for the year, as well as the factors noted above for each individual. Mr. Anquillare received an additional option grant in June 2007, which specifically recognized the increased scope of his responsibilities in connection with his promotion to CFO. Mr. Geraghty’s employment terminated effective March 8, 2007 and he received no LTI award in 2007.
 
Health, Welfare and Retirement Plans
 
We offer health and welfare benefit programs including medical, dental, life, accident and disability insurance. The Company contributes a percentage of the cost of these benefits. These benefits are available to substantially all employees, and the percentage of the Company’s contribution is the same for all.
 
Our tax-qualified retirement plans include:
 
  •      a combined 401(k) Savings Plan and ESOP,
 
  •      a defined benefit pension plan with (i) a traditional final pay formula applicable to employees who were 49 years old with 15 years of service as of January 1, 2002, and (ii) a cash balance formula applicable to other employees hired prior to March 1, 2005, and
 
  •      a profit sharing plan (as a component of the 401(k) plan) which is available to employees hired on or after March 1, 2005.
 
Our non-qualified retirement plans include a supplemental pension and savings (401(k)) plan for highly compensated employees. The combined 401(k) Savings Plan and ESOP and the pension/profit sharing plans are broad-based plans available to substantially all of our employees, including the NEOs. The


79


Table of Contents

supplemental retirement plans are offered to our highly paid employees, including our NEOs, to restore to them amounts to which they would be entitled under our tax qualified plans but which they are precluded from receiving under those plans by IRS limits. The supplemental retirement plans are unsecured obligations of the Company.
 
We established our ESOP at the time we converted from non-profit to for-profit status, in order to foster an ownership culture in the Company, and to strengthen the link between compensation and value created for stockholders. This plan has enabled our employees to hold an ownership interest in the Company as well as providing a stock vehicle for Company matching contributions to our 401(k) and profit sharing plans, which has allowed employees to monitor directly, and profit from, the increasing value of our stock since our conversion in 1997.
 
Use of Comparative Compensation Data
 
To ensure that our compensation levels remain reasonable and competitive, we have engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or Cook, to advise the Compensation Committee on executive compensation. We have used comparative data available from market surveys conducted by Cook as one component in our decision making process relating to the base salary and STI and LTI targets for our executive team. Cook most recently evaluated our executive compensation levels in the fall of 2007.
 
Employment Agreements
 
We do not currently have employment agreements with any of our NEOs. Mr. Coyne and the Company were parties to an employment agreement that expired on July 1, 2005. We expect to enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Coyne and change of control agreements with each of our other NEOs, to become effective upon the consummation of this offering. We believe that these agreements are desirable to retain the services of these individuals in whom the Company has a significant investment.
 
Impact of prior equity awards on current compensation
 
In general, we do not take into account prior equity grants, ESOP balances or amounts realized on the exercise or vesting of prior option grants in determining the number of options to be granted, because we believe we should pay an annualized market value for an executive’s position, sized according to the performance level of the individual in the position. However, because our prior practice has been to grant equity awards to the CEO on an irregular basis, these factors have been considered in connection with Mr. Coyne’s compensation. We anticipate that after the completion of this offering, Mr. Coyne will be considered for option awards annually, at the then-current fair market value of our shares, in the same manner as other NEOs. The Committee also considers prior equity grants (and related wealth accumulations) of executives in assessing the recruitment/retention risk for executives.
 
Stock Ownership Requirements for Executives
 
Senior executives are subject to minimum stock ownership requirements. The CEO is required to hold stock and in-the-money options with a value equal to 200% of his annual salary plus a STI target. The other NEOs are required to hold stock and in-the-money options with a value equal to 100% of their annual salary plus STI target. This requirement must be met no later than the third anniversary of the executive’s first becoming an officer. As of December 31, 2007, Messrs. Coyne, Stephenson, Boehning and Anquillare each held common stock and in-the-money options in excess of the requirements. Mr. Thompson joined the Company in 2006 and needs to satisfy the requirement in 2009.


80


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation and Benefits
 
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid to and earned by the Company’s NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
                                                 
                Change in Pension
       
                Value and
       
            Non-Equity
  Non-qualified
       
        Option
  Incentive Plan
  Deferred
       
        Awards ($)
  Compensation ($)
  Compensation
  All Other
   
Name and Principal Position
  Salary ($)   (1)   (2)   Earnings ($)   Compensation ($)   Total ($)
Frank J. Coyne
    898,654       1,062,800       2,000,000       300,610       80,907 (3)     4,342,971  
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
                                               
Mark V. Anquillare
    256,769       247,512       300,000       63,668       11,868 (4)     879,817  
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
                                               
Scott G. Stephenson
    419,812       644,107       600,000       83,782       52,386 (5)     1,800,087  
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
                                               
Kenneth E. Thompson
    355,000       276,646       300,000             15,173 (6)     946,819  
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
                                               
Richard Boehning(7)
    302,308       458,546       100,000       284,068       12,044 (8)     1,156,966  
Senior Vice President
                                               
Kenneth G. Geraghty(9)
    78,058       241,342             5,485       119,738 (10)     444,623  
Former Chief Financial Officer
                                               
 
 
(1) The amounts in this column reflect the expense incurred for accounting purposes in accordance with FAS 123R for options granted in 2007 and prior years under the LTI plan. For a discussion of the assumptions used to calculate the amounts shown in this column, see note 2(j) of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included as part of this prospectus.
 
(2) The amounts in this column are cash incentive awards under the STI plan in respect of performance for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
(3) Amount includes $15,187 for life insurance premiums, a 401(k) matching contribution of $10,125 and $55,595 for costs of personal benefits, including club memberships ($44,439) and automobile allowance.
 
(4) Amount includes a 401(k) matching contribution of $11,625.
 
(5) Amount includes a 401(k) matching contribution of $10,125 and $41,291 for costs of personal benefits, including commutation via commercial air carrier between the Company’s headquarters and the executive’s home, and temporary living quarters near the Company’s headquarters ($25,891). Costs of commercial air travel were determined using average rates incurred for such travel.
 
(6) Amount includes a 401(k) matching contribution of $10,125.
 
(7) Mr. Boehning retired from the Company on January 31, 2008.
 
(8) Amount includes a 401(k) matching contribution of $10,125.
 
(9) Mr. Geraghty was Chief Financial Officer until the termination of his employment effective March 8, 2007.
 
(10) Includes a severance payment of $99,310 and a 401(k) matching contribution of $10,125.


81


Table of Contents

 
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
 
The following table sets forth information concerning grants of plan-based awards made to the NEOs during the Company’s fiscal year ended 2007. We generally grant options in March, based on performance for the prior year. However, due to SEC regulations, the options shown in this table as granted in 2007 (other than Mr. Anquillare’s promotion grant) related to 2006 performance, and we consider them to be part of the NEOs’ 2006 compensation.
 
                                                     
                  All Other
                   
            Estimated
    Option
                Grant Date
 
            Future Payouts
    Awards:
                Fair Value of
 
            Under Non-Equity
    Number of
    Exercise or
          Stock and
 
            Incentive Plan
    Securities
    Base Price
    Stock
    Option
 
            Awards     Underlying
    of Option
    Value on
    Awards
 
Name
  Grant Date   Approval Date   Target ($)     Options     Awards ($/Sh)     Grant Date     ($)  
 
Frank J. Coyne
                2,700,000                          
Mark V. Anquillare
  March 1, 2007     February 22, 2007       486,000       2,100       755       755       437,703  
    June 30, 2007     June 18, 2007             300       836       836       73,443  
Scott G. Stephenson
  March 1, 2007     February 22, 2007       756,000       5,200       755       755       1,083,836  
Kenneth E. Thompson
  March 1, 2007     February 22, 2007       648,000       2,000       755       755       416,860  
Richard Boehning(1)
  March 1, 2007     February 22, 2007       549,000       2,200       755       755       458,546  
Kenneth G. Geraghty(2)
                                                   
 
(1) Mr. Boehning retired from the Company on January 31, 2008.
 
(2) Mr. Geraghty was Chief Financial Officer until the termination of his employment effective March 8, 2007.
 
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
 
The following table sets forth information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for the NEOs as of the end of the Company’s fiscal year ended 2007.
 
                                 
Option Awards(1)
        Number of
    Number of
           
        Securities
    Securities
           
        Underlying
    Underlying
           
        Unexercised
    Unexercised
    Option
     
    Date of
  Options (#)
    Options (#)
    Exercise
    Option
Name
  Option Grant   Exercisable     Unexercisable     Price ($)     Expiration Date
 
Frank J. Coyne
  July 1, 2000     10,000             100     July 1, 2010
    July 1, 2000     50,000             110     July 1, 2010
    December 18, 2002     75,000             155     December 18, 2012
    June 29, 2005     30,000       20,000       420     June 29, 2015
                                 
Mark V. Anquillare
  March 1, 2001     1,250             92     March 1, 2011
    March 1, 2002     1,750             108     March 1, 2012
    March 1, 2003     5,000             144     March 1, 2013
    March 1, 2004     3,750       1,250       231     March 1, 2014
    March 1, 2005     1,250       1,250       437     March 1, 2015
    March 1, 2006     525       1,575       565     March 1, 2016
    March 1, 2007           2,100       755     March 1, 2017
    June 1, 2007           300       836     June 1, 2017
                                 


82


Table of Contents

                                 
Option Awards(1)
        Number of
    Number of
           
        Securities
    Securities
           
        Underlying
    Underlying
           
        Unexercised
    Unexercised
    Option
     
    Date of
  Options (#)
    Options (#)
    Exercise
    Option
Name
  Option Grant   Exercisable     Unexercisable     Price ($)     Expiration Date
 
Scott G. Stephenson
  March 1, 2003     18,750             144     March 1, 2013
    March 1, 2004     9,750       3,250       231     March 1, 2014
    March 1, 2005     4,000       4,000       437     March 1, 2015
    March 1, 2006     1,350       4,050       565     March 1, 2016
    March 1, 2007           5,200       755     March 1, 2017
                                 
Kenneth E. Thompson
  October 2, 2006     1,000       3,000       681     October 2, 2016
    March 1, 2007           2,000       755     March 1, 2017
                                 
Richard Boehning
  March 1, 2003     1,250             144     March 1, 2013
    March 1, 2004     1,000       1,000       231     March 1, 2014
    March 1, 2005     625       1,250       437     March 1, 2015
    March 1, 2006     575       1,725       565     March 1, 2016
    March 1, 2007           2,200       755     March 1, 2017
Kenneth G. Geraghty
                           
 
(1) The right to exercise stock options vests ratably on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant for options granted to NEOs other than Mr. Coyne. A portion of Mr. Coyne’s options with an exercise price above the grant date fair market value vested immediately.
 
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
 
The following table sets forth information concerning each exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights for the NEOs during 2007. No stock, restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards held by any NEO vested during 2007.
 
                 
    Option Awards  
    Number of
       
    Shares Acquired
    Value
 
    on Exercise
    Realized on
 
Name
  (#)     Exercise ($)  
 
Frank J. Coyne
           
Mark V. Anquillare
           
Scott G. Stephenson
           
Kenneth E. Thompson
           
Richard Boehning
           
Kenneth G. Geraghty
    4,850       2,172,400  
 
Pension Plans
 
The following table sets forth information with respect to each plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement.
 
Employees hired prior to March 1, 2005 participate in the Pension Plan for Insurance Organizations, or PPIO, a multiple-employer pension plan in which we participate. The PPIO provides a traditional final pay

83


Table of Contents

formula pension benefit, payable as an annuity, to employees who were 49 years old with 15 years of service as of January 1, 2002. Effective January 1, 2002, this formula benefit was frozen for all eligible employees. Effective January 1, 2002, a cash balance pension benefit, also payable as an annuity, was established under the PPIO. Employees hired prior to January 1, 2002 receive their frozen traditional benefit as well as their cash balance benefit. Employees hired from January 1, 2002 to March 1, 2005 receive only the cash balance benefit. The Supplemental Cash Balance Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”) provide a benefit to which the participant would be entitled under the PPIO but which is subject to caps imposed by IRS regulations. Employees hired on or after March 1, 2005 are not eligible to participate in the PPIO or the Supplemental Plan.
 
                             
        Number of Years
    Present Value of
    Payments During
 
        Credited Service
    Accumulated Benefit
    Last Fiscal Year
 
Name
  Plan Name   (#)     ($)     ($)  
 
Frank J. Coyne
  PPIO     9       94,469        
    Supplemental Plan     9       1,433,441        
                             
Mark V. Anquillare
  PPIO     16       168,385        
    Supplemental Plan     16       99,879        
                             
Scott G. Stephenson
  PPIO     7       90,848        
    Supplemental Plan     7       249,177        
                             
Kenneth E. Thompson
        NA       NA       NA  
                             
Richard Boehning
  PPIO     10       867,347        
    Supplemental Plan     10       1,163,069        
                             
Kenneth G. Geraghty
  PPIO     7       41,737       65,570  
    Supplemental Plan     7       64,364        
 
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
 
The following table sets forth information with respect to each defined contribution or other plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.
 
                                         
                            Aggregate
 
    Executive
    Registrant
    Aggregate
    Aggregate
    Balance
 
    Contributions
    Contributions
    Earnings
    Withdrawals/
    at end of
 
    in Last FY
    in Last FY
    in Last FY
    Distributions
    Last FY
 
Name
  ($)     ($)     ($)     ($)     ($)  
 
Frank J. Coyne
                             
Mark V. Anquillare
                             
Scott G. Stephenson
                             
Kenneth E. Thompson
                             
Richard Boehning
                             
Kenneth G. Geraghty
                54,242             1,215,357  
 
2007 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
 
There are no agreements or arrangements in place applicable to the NEOs relating to payments upon termination or change of control, other than severance payments upon termination (other than for cause) available to all salaried employees.
 
We expect that, prior to completing this offering, we will enter into an employment agreement with Frank J. Coyne that will incorporate provisions for payments to be made upon termination of his employment. Payments will be due in the event Mr. Coyne’s employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause, or is voluntarily terminated by Mr. Coyne for “good reason,” which will be defined in the agreement.


84


Table of Contents

We expect the agreement to provide that, upon a qualifying termination event, Mr. Coyne will be entitled to:
 
  (i)  a pro rata STI award;
 
  (ii)  a severance payment equal to his base salary plus target bonus amount multiplied by the lesser of (a) the number of years remaining in the term of his employment contract or (b) two;
 
  (iii)  continuation of health benefits (at his expense) for 18 months; and
 
  (iv)  immediate vesting of any remaining unvested options.
 
The amount of the pro rata bonus will be at target level if the termination of employment occurs following a change of control, and will otherwise be determined by the Compensation Committee at the end of the year based on Company performance. The severance and pro-rata bonus amounts will be payable in cash, in a lump sum. Receipt of these benefits is conditioned upon Mr. Coyne executing a general release of claims against the Company, and complying with confidentiality, non-compete and nonsolicitation agreements for a period of 24 months. If this agreement had been in place at December 31, 2007, in the event of a qualifying termination Mr. Coyne would be entitled to cash payments totaling $4,500,000.
 
In addition, we expect that, prior to completion of this Offering, the Company will enter into Severance Agreements with the other NEOs currently employed by the Company. These agreements will incorporate provisions for payments to be made to the NEOs upon termination of their employment. Payments will be due in the event the executive’s employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause, or is voluntarily terminated by the executive for “good reason,” which will be defined in the agreements, within a two-year period following a “change of control.”
 
We expect these agreements to provide that, upon a qualifying termination event, a NEO (other than Mr. Coyne) will be entitled to:
 
  (i)  a pro rata STI award;
 
  (ii)  a severance payment equal to the executive’s base salary plus target bonus amount times two;
 
  (iii)  continuation of health benefits (at the executives expense) for 18 months; and
 
  (iv)  immediate vesting of any remaining unvested options.
 
The severance and pro rata bonus amounts will be payable in cash, in a lump sum. Receipt of these benefits is conditioned upon the executive executing a general release of claims against the Company, and complying with confidentiality, non-compete and nonsolicitation agreements for a period of 24 months. If these agreements had been in place at December 31, 2007, in the event of a qualifying termination Mr. Stephenson would be entitled to cash payments totaling $1,470,000, Mr. Anquillare would be entitled to cash payments totaling $945,000, and Mr. Thompson would be entitled to cash payments totaling $1,260,000.
 
Mr. Geraghty received $99,310 severance in connection with the termination if his employment on March 8, 2007. The unvested portion of LTI awards previously granted to Mr. Geraghty lapsed upon termination of his employment.
 
Verisk Analytics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
 
We expect to adopt the Verisk Analytics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Incentive Plan, prior to the consummation of this offering. The Incentive Plan will replace the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan, or the 1996 Plan, pursuant to which LTI awards are currently granted. The purposes of the Incentive Plan will be (i) to advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining high caliber employees and other key individuals, (ii) to continue to align the interests of recipients of LTI awards with the interest of the Company’s stockholders by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in our growth


85


Table of Contents

and success as measured by the value of our stock and (iii) to motivate award recipients to act in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
 
Shares Available.              shares of our Class A common stock may be subject to awards under the Incentive Plan, or the Plan Share Limit, subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, combination, exchange of shares, split-up, extraordinary dividend or distribution, spin-off, warrants or rights offering to purchase common stock at a price substantially below fair market value, or other similar event. If, with respect to any award such award is cancelled, forfeited, or terminates or expires unexercised, or if shares are tendered or withheld from an award to pay the option price or satisfy a tax withholding obligation, such shares may again be issued under the Incentive Plan.
 
Eligibility.   All employees eligible for LTI awards under the 1996 Plan will be eligible for awards under the Incentive Plan.
 
Administration.   The administration of the Incentive Plan will be overseen by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will have the authority to interpret the Incentive Plan and make all determinations necessary or desirable for the administration of the Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee will have discretion to select participants and determine the form, amount and timing of each award to such persons, the exercise price or base price associated with the award, the time and conditions of exercise or settlement of the award and all other terms and conditions of an award.
 
Forms of Awards.   Awards under the Incentive Plan may include one or more of the following types: (i) stock options (both nonqualified and incentive stock options), (ii) stock appreciation rights, or SARs, (iii) restricted stock, (iv) restricted stock units, (v) performance grants (vi) other share based award and (vii) cash. Such awards may be for partial-year, annual or multi-year periods.
 
Options are rights to purchase a specified number of shares of our Class A common stock at a price fixed by our Compensation Committee, but not less than fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant. Options generally expire no later than 10 years after the date of grant. Options will become exercisable at such time and in such installments as our Compensation Committee will determine, and the Compensation Committee will determine the period of time, if any, after termination of employment, death, or disability during which options may be exercised.
 
An SAR entitles the holder to receive, upon exercise, an amount equal to any positive difference between the fair market value of one share of our Class A common stock on the date the SAR is exercised and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares of common stock with respect to which the SAR is exercised. Our Compensation Committee will have the authority to determine whether the amount to be paid upon exercise of an SAR will be paid in cash, Class A common stock (including restricted stock) or a combination of cash and Class A common stock.
 
Restricted stock consists of shares of our Class A common stock subject to a restriction on transfer during a period of time or until performance measures are satisfied, as established by our Compensation Committee. Unless otherwise set forth in the agreement relating to a restricted stock award, the holder will have all rights as a stockholder, including voting rights, the right to receive dividends and the right to participate in any capital adjustment applicable to all holders of common stock. However, our Compensation Committee may determine that distributions with respect to shares of common stock will be deposited with the Company and will be subject to the same restrictions as the shares of common stock with respect to which such distribution was made.
 
A restricted stock unit is a right to receive a specified number of shares of our Class A common stock (or the fair market value thereof in cash, or any combination of our common stock and cash, as determined by our Compensation Committee), subject to the expiration of a specified restriction period and/or the achievement of any performance measures selected by the Compensation Committee, consistent with the terms of the Incentive Plan. The restricted stock unit award agreement will specify whether the award recipient is entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to the number of shares of our Class A common stock subject to the award. Prior to the settlement of a restricted stock unit award in our Class A


86


Table of Contents

common stock, the award recipient will have no rights as a stockholder of our Company with respect to our Class A common stock subject to the award.
 
Performance grants are awards whose final value or amount, if any, is determined by the degree to which specified performance measures have been achieved during a performance period set by our Compensation Committee. Performance periods can be partial-year, annual or multi-year periods, as determined by our Compensation Committee. Performance measures that may be used include (without limitation) one or more of the following: the attainment by a share of Class A common stock of a specified value within or for a specified period of time, earnings per share, earnings before interest expense and taxes, return to stockholders (including dividends), return on equity, earnings, revenues, cash flow or cost reduction goals, operating profit, pretax return on total capital, economic value added or any combination of the foregoing. Such criteria and objectives may relate to results obtained by the individual, the Company, a subsidiary, or an affiliate, or any business unit or division thereof, or may relate to results obtained relative to a specific industry or a specific index. Payment may be made in the form of cash, Class A common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units or a combination thereof, as specified by our Compensation Committee.
 
Annual incentive awards are generally cash awards based on the degree to which certain of any or all of a combination of individual, team, department, division, subsidiary, group or corporate performance objectives are met or not met. Our Compensation Committee may establish the terms and provisions, including performance objectives, for any annual incentive award.
 
An award agreement may contain additional terms and restrictions, including vesting conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Incentive Plan, as the Compensation Committee may determine.
 
We intend to file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the shares of our Class A common stock issuable under the Incentive Plan.


87


Table of Contents

 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
 
Indebtedness of Directors and Management
 
As of the date of this offering, we do not have any loans outstanding with any director or executive officer. Prior to this offering, we loaned money to certain of our directors and employees, including certain executive officers, to enable them to exercise their options to purchase our Class A common stock. These loans were made pursuant to promissory notes and stock pledge agreements, whereby the director or employee pledged shares issued upon the exercise of the options in order to secure repayment of the loan amount. In addition to the shares pledged as collateral, the Company would have full recourse to the personal assets of the borrower in the event of default.
 
The loans were made in an amount equal to the purchase price of the Class A common stock and, in some cases, the amount of income tax payable upon exercise of the option. The loans had terms ranging from three to nine years and interest rates based on the Internal Revenue Service applicable federal rates. Payments of the principal and interest were deferred until the end of the loan terms.
 
The following table sets forth information concerning the indebtedness owed by our directors and executive officers over the previous three years. The amounts noted at each date below represent the largest aggregate amount of indebtedness outstanding at any time during that period, except that the amounts for August 12, 2008 represent the amount outstanding on that date.
 
                                 
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    As of
 
    December 31, 2005     December 31, 2006     December 31, 2007     September 30, 2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Frank J. Coyne
  $     $ 6,449     $     $  
Scott G. Stephenson
    5,003       5,160       5,323        
Mark V. Anquillare
    487       503       519        
Carole J. Banfield
    3,466       4,193       4,930        
Vincent Cialdella
    528       766       1,428        
Kevin B. Thompson
    313                    
Glen A. Dell
    1,930       2,496       3,107        
Henry J. Feinberg
    1,665       1,727       1,791        
John F. Lehman
    1,930       1,991       2,054        
Arthur J. Rothkopf
    1,801       1,862       1,921        
Barbara D. Stewart
          438       457        
David B. Wright
    467       489       511        
Kenneth G. Geraghty(1)
    7,206       8,716       10,588        
 
(1) Mr. Geraghty was Chief Financial Officer of the Company until termination of his employment effective March 8, 2007.
 
Since January 1, 2005, certain of our loans outstanding with our directors and executive officers have been repaid. On January 20, 2005, January 2, 2007 and April 2, 2007, Frank J. Coyne repaid loans in the amounts of $7.7 million, $3.8 million and $2.5 million, plus interest of $0.4 million $0.2 million and 0.1 million, respectively. On April 4, 2008, Henry J. Feinberg repaid a loan in the amount of $1.5 million, plus interest of $0.3 million. On April 15, 2005 and April 26, 2006, Kevin B. Thompson repaid loans in the amounts of $0.4 million and $0.3 million, plus interest of $33 thousand and $13 thousand, respectively. On January 2, 2008, Kenneth G. Geraghty repaid loans in the amounts of $9.6 million, plus interest of $1.0 million.


88


Table of Contents

Share Repurchases
 
Pursuant to the terms of the 1996 Plan, holders of our Class A common stock, including directors and executive officers, had a right to require us to repurchase their shares at the then-current value on the date of repurchase. This right terminates upon completion of this offering. Since January 1, 2005, we have repurchased 270,955 shares of Class A common stock from our ESOP for an aggregate amount of $169 million. As specified in the 1996 Plan, the price per share paid for such repurchases, which ranged from $417 to $867 per share, was equal to the value of our Class A common stock as most recently established prior to the date of each repurchase pursuant to our ESOP. Since January 1, 2005, we have repurchased Class A common stock from our directors, executive officers and holders of greater than five percent of our Class A common stock for the following aggregate amounts:
 
                                 
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Six Months Ended
 
    December 31, 2005     December 31, 2006     December 31, 2007     June 30, 2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Frank J. Coyne
  $ 70,262     $ 26,931     $ 16,436     $  
Carole J. Banfield
    3,838       2,511       8,060       5,447  
Vincent Cialdella
    55       838       413       15  
Kevin B. Thompson
    546       1,971       2,525        
Glen A. Dell
    1,374       594       612        
Henry J. Feinberg
                      13,417  
Kenneth G. Geraghty(1)
    417             916       62,993  
Fred R. Marcon(2)
    1,086       10,438       6,019       83,256  
 
(1) Mr. Geraghty was our Chief Financial Officer until termination of his employment effective March 8, 2007.
 
(2) Mr. Marcon was our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and was the beneficial owner of greater that 5% of our Class A common stock
 
We have also, from time to time, repurchased shares of our Class B common stock. Since January 1, 2005, we have not repurchased any Class B common stock from any stockholder that owns greater than five percent of our Class B common stock.
 
Customer Relationships
 
The stockholders who own greater than five percent of our Class B common stock purchase solutions from both our Risk Assessment and Decision Analytics segments. They purchase our solutions in the ordinary course of business pursuant to agreements on terms substantially similar and not more favorable to those in our agreements with other customers purchasing the same solutions. The agreements provide them with a non-exclusive non-transferable license to use our solutions and are in effect until the customer chooses to discontinue the use our solutions. Our customers provide us with data in connection with some of the solutions they purchase from us. Stockholders who own greater than five percent of our Class B common stock provide us with data in connection with those solutions on terms substantially similar and not more favorable to those under which our other customers supply us similar data.
 
We received fees from the Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. of $15.1 million, $16.0 million and $16.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We received fees from The Travelers Companies, Inc. of $27.3 million, $29.3 million and $31.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $15.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Samuel G. Liss, one of our Class B directors, is Executive Vice President of Strategic Development and Executive Vice President of Financial, Professional and International Insurance at The Travelers Companies. We received fees from CNA Financial Corporation of $10.7 million, $9.7 million and $9.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Stephen W. Lilienthal, one of our


89


Table of Contents

Class B directors, is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation. We received fees from American Financial Group, Inc. of $3.9 million, $4.3 million and $4.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We received fees from American International Group, Inc. of $16.9 million, $18.9 million and $16.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We received fees from ACE Group Holdings, Inc. of $5.4 million, $5.6 million and $6.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
 
We also purchase insurance coverage in the ordinary course of business from certain of our stockholders who own greater than five percent of our Class B common stock. We paid insurance coverage premiums to CNA Financial Corporation of $0.3 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We paid insurance coverage premiums to American International Group, Inc. of $1.5 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2007, respectively, and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We paid insurance coverage premiums to ACE Group Holdings, Inc. of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
Letter Agreements
 
We have entered into letter agreements with each of our directors and executive officers whereby they have agreed that 50% of their Class A common stock (minus any shares sold in this offering) not previously sold in a registered public offering may not be sold until 18 months after the closing of this offering and the remaining percentage of their shares not previously sold in a registered public offering may not be sold until 30 months after the closing of this offering. In addition, our directors and executive officers have agreed that during the time periods described above, they will not execute any hedging agreement or swap or any other arrangement that transfers or disposes of, directly or indirectly, any of their shares or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for such stock or any of the economic consequences of ownership of their shares, whether settled in cash or stock. Any of our directors or executive officers having reached the age of 70 will no longer be restricted from selling their shares pursuant to such letter agreements.
 
Family Relationships
 
We employ Michael Coyne as President of our Urix subsidiary. From March 27, 2006 to March 9, 2008 we employed Mr. Coyne as chief operating officer of DXCG, Inc., a predecessor to Urix. Mr. Coyne received salary and bonus of $137,923, $172,877 and $226,615 in the aggregate for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and received options to purchase 760 shares of our Class A common stock in 2007. Mr. Coyne is the son of Frank J. Coyne, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe that the compensation paid to Mr. Coyne was comparable with compensation paid to other employees with similar levels of responsibility and years of service.
 
We employ Christine Pia as Associate Counsel in our Law Department. Ms. Pia received salary of $55,288 and $146,535 for the five months ended December 31, 2006 and the year ended December 2007, respectively. Ms. Pia is the daughter of Frank J. Coyne, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe that the compensation paid to Ms. Pia was comparable with compensation paid to other employees with similar levels of responsibility and years of service.
 
ESOP
 
We established an ESOP funded with intercompany debt that includes 401(k), ESOP and profit sharing components to provide employees with equity participation. The ESOP owns greater than five percent of our Class A common stock. We make quarterly cash contributions to the plan equal to the debt service requirements. As the debt is repaid, shares are released to the ESOP to fund 401(k) matching and profit sharing contributions and the remainder is allocated annually to active employees in proportion to their eligible compensation in relation to total participant eligible compensation. The amount of our ESOP costs


90


Table of Contents

recognized for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $13.6 million, $18.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $11.6 million.
 
Voting rights with respect to shares of our Class A common stock owned by the ESOP are exercised by the trustee of the ESOP. Prior to the completion of this offering, in the case of a corporate merger or consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, liquidation, dissolution, or sale of substantially all assets, the trustee was required to vote shares allocated to an ESOP participant’s account as directed by the ESOP participant. For shares of stock not allocated to a participant’s account, and for all other corporate matters, the shares were voted in accordance with the discretion of the trustee. Upon completion of this offering, the trustee will vote shares allocated to an ESOP participants’ account as directed by the ESOP participant for all matters submitted to a vote of our Class A stockholders. Shares of stock not allocated to a participant’s account will continue to be voted in accordance with the discretion of the trustee.
 
Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons
 
Prior to the completion of this offering, our board of directors will adopt a written statement of policy regarding transactions with related persons. Our related person policy requires that a “related person” (as defined as in paragraph (a) of Item 404 of Regulation S-K) must promptly disclose to the corporate secretary any “related person transaction” (defined as any transaction that is reportable by us under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) and all material facts with respect thereto. The corporate secretary will then promptly communicate that information to the board of directors or the designated board committee. No related person transaction will be consummated without the approval or ratification of the board of directors or any committee of the board of directors consisting exclusively of disinterested directors. The board of directors has initially designated the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to approve any related person transaction. It is our policy that directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse themselves from any vote of a related person transaction in which they have an interest.


91


Table of Contents

 
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
 
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock as of          , 2008, by:
 
  •      each person whom we know to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock;
 
  •      each of the directors and named executive officers individually;
 
  •      all directors and executive officers as a group; and
 
  •      each of the selling stockholders, which consist of the entities and individuals shown as having shares listed in the column “Number of Shares Being Offered.”
 
In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, beneficial ownership includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and includes the shares issuable pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of          , 2008. Shares issuable pursuant to stock options are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such options but are not outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. The percentage of beneficial ownership for the following table is based on           shares of Class A common stock and shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of          , 2008. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each listed stockholder is: c/o Verisk Analytics, Inc., 545 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, New Jersey, 07310-1686. To our knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock.
 
                                                 
                            Shares Beneficially
 
                            Owned After the Offering(1)  
    Class of our
    Shares Beneficially Owned Before
    Number
    Common Stock
       
Name and Address of
  Common
    the Offering     of Shares
    Beneficially
       
Beneficial Owner   Stock     Number     Percent     Being Offered     Owned     Percent  
 
Principal Stockholders:
                                               
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
                                               
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. 
                                               
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 
                                               
CNA Financial Corporation
                                               
American Financial Group, Inc. 
                                               
American International Group, Inc. 
                                               
ACE Group Holdings, Inc. 
                                               
Directors and Executive Officers:
                                               
Frank J. Coyne
                                               
Scott G. Stephenson
                                               
Mark V. Anquillare
                                               
Kenneth E. Thompson
                                               
Carole J. Banfield
                                               
Vincent Cialdella
                                               
Kevin B. Thompson
                                               
J. Hyatt Brown
                                               
Glen A. Dell
                                               
Henry J. Feinberg
                                               
Christopher M. Foskett
                                               


92


Table of Contents

                                                 
                            Shares Beneficially
 
                            Owned After the Offering(1)  
    Class of our
    Shares Beneficially Owned Before
    Number
    Common Stock
       
Name and Address of
  Common
    the Offering     of Shares
    Beneficially
       
Beneficial Owner   Stock     Number     Percent     Being Offered     Owned     Percent  
 
Constantine P. Iordanou
                                               
John F. Lehman, Jr. 
                                               
Stephen W. Lilienthal
                                               
Samuel G. Liss
                                               
Andrew G. Mills
                                               
Arthur J. Rothkopf
                                               
Barbara D. Stewart
                                               
David B. Wright
                                               
All 19 directors and executive officers as a group
                                               
 
(1) Assumes no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. See “Underwriting.”

93


Table of Contents

 
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
 
Following this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of 1,200,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 800,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share, sub-divided into the following two series of Class B common stock: (1) 400,000,000 shares of Class B (Series 1) common stock and (2) 400,000,000 shares of Class B (Series 2) common stock, and 80,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.
 
The following descriptions are summaries of the material terms of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, and the descriptions are qualified by reference to those documents. Please refer to the more detailed provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, copies of which are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to our registration statement and applicable law.
 
Common Stock
 
Voting Rights
 
Holders of our common stock have the sole right and power to vote on all matters on which a vote of stockholders is to be taken, except as provided by statute or resolution of our board of directors in connection with the issuance of preferred stock in accordance with our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. The holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock generally have identical rights, except that only holders of Class A common stock are entitled to vote on the election of Class A directors and only holders of Class B common stock are entitled to vote on the election of Class B directors.
 
From the consummation of this offering of our Class A common stock until the earlier of (a) the 30-month anniversary of the date of this prospectus or (b) the date on which there are no shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding, the amendment of certain of the provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will require the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes cast thereon by the outstanding shares of each of the Class A common stock and the Class B common stock, voting separately as a class. These provisions include certain of the limitations described below under “— Dividend Rights,” “— Liquidation Rights,” “— Transfer Restrictions,” “— Conversion,” “— Beneficial Ownership Limitations” and “Anti-Takeover Effects of Delaware Law — Staggered Boards.” From and after the earlier of the events described above, the amendment of the provisions described below under “— Beneficial Ownership Limitations” in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will require the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock.
 
Dividend Rights
 
Our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will share equally (on a per share basis) in any dividend declared by our board of directors, subject to any preferential or other rights of any outstanding preferred stock and to the distinction that any stock dividends will be paid in shares of Class A common stock to the holders of our Class A common stock and in shares of Class B common stock to the holders of our Class B common stock.
 
Liquidation Rights
 
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will be entitled to receive ratably the assets available for distribution to the stockholders after payment of liabilities and payment of preferential and other amounts, if any, payable on any outstanding preferred stock.
 
Transfer Restrictions
 
Shares of our Class B (Series 1) common stock are not transferable until 18 months after the date of this prospectus. Shares of our Class B (Series 2) common stock are not transferable until 30 months after the


94


Table of Contents

date of this prospectus. Upon the consummation of this offering, the above described limitations on transfer are, however, subject to the following exceptions:
 
  •      any transfer to us by any person or entity;
 
  •      any transfer of any shares of Class B common stock of either series to any other holder of Class B common stock or its affiliate;
 
  •      any transfer of any shares of Class B common stock of any applicable series to an affiliate of such holder; and
 
  •      any transfer by a holder of Class B common stock to any person that succeeds to all or substantially all of the assets of such holder, whether by merger, consolidation, amalgamation, sale of substantially all assets or other similar transactions.
 
Our board of directors may approve exceptions to the limitation on transfers of our Class B common stock in their sole discretion, in connection with the sale of such Class B common stock in a public offering registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in such other limited circumstances as our board of directors may determine. Any Class B common stock sold to the public will first be converted to Class A common stock.
 
Conversion
 
Our Class A common stock is not convertible into any other shares of our capital stock. Each share of Class B (Series 1) common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the holder, into one share of Class A common stock 18 months after the date of this prospectus. Each share of Class B (Series 2) common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the holder, into one share of Class A common stock 30 months after the date of this prospectus. The conversion rate applicable to any conversion of shares of our Class B common stock shall always be one-to-one (i.e., one share of Class B common stock will, upon transfer, be converted into one share of Class A common stock).
 
Once transferred and converted into Class A common stock, the Class B common stock shall not be reissued. No class of common stock may be subdivided or combined unless the other class of common stock concurrently is subdivided or combined in the same proportion and in the same manner.
 
No conversions of shares of Class B common stock will be effected prior to the expiration of the transfer restrictions described under “— Transfer Restrictions,” although our board of directors may make exceptions to such transfer restrictions.
 
Beneficial Ownership Limitations
 
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will prohibit any insurance company from beneficially owning more than ten percent of the aggregate outstanding shares of our common stock. If any transfer is purportedly effected which, if effected, would result in a violation of this limitation, the intended transferee will acquire no rights in respect of the shares in excess of this limitation, and the purported transfer of such number of excess shares will be null and void. In this context an insurance company means any insurance company whose primary activity is the writing of insurance or the reinsuring of risks underwritten by insurance companies or any other entity controlling, controlled by or under common ownership, management or control with such insurer or reinsurer
 
Preferred Stock
 
The board of directors has the authority to issue the preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of such series, without further vote or action by the stockholders. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of


95


Table of Contents

the Company without further action by the stockholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of common stock. At present, we have no plans to issue any of the preferred stock.
 
Anti-Takeover Effects of Delaware Law
 
Following consummation of this offering, we will be subject to the “business combination” provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, such provisions prohibit a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in various “business combination” transactions with any interested stockholder for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless
 
  •      the transaction is approved by the board of directors prior to the date the interested stockholder obtained such status;
 
  •      upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced; or
 
  •      on or subsequent to such date the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2 / 3 % of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.
 
A “business combination” is defined to include mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in financial benefit to a stockholder. In general, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years, did own) 15% or more of a corporation’s voting stock. The statute could prohibit or delay mergers or other takeover or change in control attempts with respect to the Company and, accordingly, may discourage attempts to acquire us even though such a transaction may offer the our stockholders the opportunity to sell their stock at a price above the prevailing market price.
 
Advance Notice of Proposals and Nominations
 
Our bylaws establish advance notice procedures with regard to stockholders’ proposals relating to the nomination of candidates for election as directors or other business to be brought before meetings of its stockholders. These procedures provide that notice of such stockholders’ proposals must be timely given in writing to our secretary prior to the meeting at which the action is to be taken. Generally, to be timely, notice must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary date of the annual meeting for the preceding year. The notice must contain certain information specified in the bylaws.
 
Limits on Written Consents
 
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation prohibits stockholder action by written consent.
 
Limits on Special Meetings
 
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called by our board of directors, the chairman of the board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President or our Secretary.
 
Staggered Boards
 
Our board of directors is divided into three classes serving staggered terms. The number of directors will be fixed by our board of directors, subject to the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. From the date of this prospectus until the earlier of (a) the 30-month anniversary of the date of this prospectus or (b) the date on which there are no shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding, our board of directors will consist of between 11 and 13 directors, and will be comprised as follows:
 
  •      between eight to ten Class A directors; and
 
  •      three Class B directors.


96


Table of Contents

Vacancies on our board of directors among the Class A directors will be filled by a majority of the remaining Class A directors and vacancies among the Class B directors will be filled by a majority of the remaining Class B directors.
 
From and after the earlier of the events described above, there will no longer be Class B directors, and each director will be elected for a three-year term by the holders of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of the directors.
 
Listing
 
We expect to list our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “          .”
 
Transfer Agent and Registrar
 
The Transfer Agent and Registrar for the Class A common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC.


97


Table of Contents

 
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR
NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
 
The following is a general discussion of the material U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of common stock by a beneficial owner that is a “non-U.S. holder”, other than a non-U.S. holder that owns, or has owned, actually or constructively, more than 5% of the Company’s common stock. A “non-U.S. holder” is a person or entity that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is:
 
  •      a non-resident alien individual, other than certain former citizens and residents of the United States subject to tax as expatriates,
 
  •      a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of a jurisdiction other than the United States or any state or political subdivision thereof; or
 
  •      an estate or trust, other than an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.
 
A “non-U.S. holder” does not include an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and is not otherwise a resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such an individual should consult his or her own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the sale, exchange, or other disposition of common stock.
 
A “non-U.S. holder” does not include an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and is not otherwise a resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such an individual is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the sale, exchange or other disposition of common stock.
 
This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury Regulations, changes to any of which subsequent to the date of this prospectus may affect the tax consequences described herein. This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income and estate taxation that may be relevant to non-U.S. holders in light of their particular circumstances or to non U.S. holders that may be subject to special treatment under U.S. federal tax laws, such as financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, hybrid entities, partnership and other pass-through entities, stockholders or beneficiaries of non-U.S. holders, broker-dealers, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that receive the common stock of the Company as compensation, or persons that hold the common stock of the Company as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated investment. Furthermore, this discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction. Prospective holders are urged to consult their tax advisors with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of owning and disposing of common stock, including the consequences under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction.
 
Dividends
 
Distributions will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from the current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent the distributions exceed the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, such distributions will constitute a return of capital and will first reduce a holder’s adjusted tax basis in its common stock and, thereafter, will be treated as capital gain. Distributions that constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes that are paid to a non-U.S. holder of common stock generally will be subject to withholding tax at a 30% rate or a reduced rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty. In order to obtain a reduced rate of withholding, a non-U.S. holder will be required to provide an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN certifying its entitlement to benefits under a treaty.
 
The withholding tax does not apply to dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder who provides a Form W-8ECI, certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a


98


Table of Contents

trade or business within the United States. Effectively connected dividends, net of certain deductions and credits, will be subject to regular U.S. income tax as if the non-U.S. holder were a U.S. person, unless an applicable income tax treaty provides otherwise. A non-U.S. corporation receiving effectively connected dividends may also be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” imposed at a rate of 30% (or a lower rate provided by any applicable income tax treaty).
 
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock
 
A non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain realized on a sale or other disposition of common stock unless:
 
  •      the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of the non-U.S. holder in the United States, subject to an applicable income treaty providing otherwise, or
 
  •      the Company is or has been a U.S. real property holding corporation at any time within the five-year period preceding the disposition or the non-U.S. holder’s holding period, whichever period is shorter, and its common stock has ceased to be traded on an established securities market prior to the beginning of the calendar year in which the sale or disposition occurs.
 
The Company believes that it is not, and does not anticipate becoming, a U.S. real property holding corporation.
 
Gain that is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business will be subject to regular U.S. income tax as if the non-U.S. holder were a U.S. person, subject to an applicable income tax treaty providing otherwise. A non-U.S. corporation with effectively connected gains may also be subject to additional “branch profits tax” imposed at a rate of 30% (or a lower treaty rate).
 
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding
 
Information returns will be filed with the Internal Revenue Service in connection with payments of dividends. This information also may be made available to the tax authorities in the non-U.S. holder’s country of residence. A non-U.S. holder may have to comply with certification procedures to establish that it is not a U.S. person in order to avoid information reporting and backup withholding with respect to payments of dividends and the proceeds from a sale or other disposition of common stock. The certification procedures required to claim a reduced rate of withholding under a treaty generally should also satisfy the certification requirements necessary to avoid the backup withholding tax as well. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a non-U.S. holder will be allowed as a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
 
Federal Estate Tax
 
Individual non-United States Holders and entities the property of which is potentially includible in such an individual’s gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes (for example, a trust funded by such an individual and with respect to which the individual has retained certain interests or powers), should note that, absent an applicable treaty benefit, the common stock will be treated as U.S. situs property subject to U.S. federal estate tax.


99


Table of Contents

 
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
 
Prior to this offering, there has been no market for our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market could adversely affect market prices prevailing from time to time. Furthermore, because only a limited number of shares will be available for sale shortly after this offering due to existing contractual and legal restrictions on resale as described below, there may be sales of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market after the restrictions lapse. This may adversely affect the prevailing market price and our ability to raise equity capital in the future.
 
Upon completion of this offering, we will have           shares of Class A common stock outstanding, assuming no exercise of any options and warrants outstanding as of          , 2008, and shares of Class B common stock outstanding. Of these shares,           shares of Class A common stock, (or           shares of Class A common stock if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), sold in this offering will be freely transferable without restriction or registration under the Securities Act, except for any shares purchased by one of our existing “affiliates,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The remaining           shares of Class A common stock existing are “restricted shares” as defined in Rule 144. Restricted shares may be sold in the public market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under the Securities Act.
 
In addition, immediately following this offering, our existing stockholders will hold           shares of our Class B (series 1) common stock (or           shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), each of which will, on the 18-month anniversary of the date of this prospectus, be automatically converted for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. Also, immediately following this offering, our existing stockholders will hold           shares of our Class B (series 2) common stock (or           shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), each of which will, on the 30-month anniversary of the date of this prospectus, be automatically converted for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. Any shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of such shares will be freely tradable without restriction or registration under the Securities Act by persons other than our affiliates.
 
As a result of the contractual 180-day lock-up period described below and the provisions of Rules 144 and 701, these shares will be available for sale in the public market as follows:
 
     
Number of Shares of Class A Common Stock
 
Date
 
    On the date of this prospectus.
    After 180 days from the date of this prospectus (subject, in some cases, to volume limitations).
    At various times after 180 days from the date of this prospectus (subject, in some cases, to volume limitations).
 
Rule 144
 
In general, under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as in effect on the date of this prospectus, beginning 90 days after the effective date of this offering, a person who is not one of our affiliates who has beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least six months may sell shares without restriction, provided the current public information requirements of Rule 144 continue to be satisfied. In addition, any person who is not one of our affiliates at any time during the three months preceding a proposed sale, and who has beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least one year would be entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares without restriction. Our affiliates who have beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least six months are entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
 
  •      one percent of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding, which will equal approximately           shares immediately after this offering; and


100


Table of Contents

  •      the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the           during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.
 
Sales of restricted shares under Rule 144 are also subject to requirements regarding the manner of sale, notice, and the availability of current public information about us. Rule 144 also provides that affiliates relying on Rule 144 to sell shares of our common stock that are not restricted shares must nonetheless comply with the same restrictions applicable to restricted shares, other than the holding period requirement.
 
Rule 701
 
In general, under Rule 701, any of our employees, directors, officers, consultants or advisors who purchases shares from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or other written agreement before the effective date of this offering is entitled to resell such shares 90 days after the effective date of this offering in reliance on Rule 144, without having to comply with the holding period requirements or other restrictions contained in Rule 701.
 
The Securities and Exchange Commission has indicated that Rule 701 will apply to typical stock options granted by an issuer before it becomes subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, along with the shares acquired upon exercise of such options, including exercises after the date of this prospectus. Securities issued in reliance on Rule 701 are restricted securities and, subject to the contractual restrictions described above, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, may be sold by persons other than “affiliates,” as defined in Rule 144, subject only to the manner of sale provisions of Rule 144 and by “affiliates” under Rule 144 without compliance with its one-year minimum holding period requirement.
 
Stock Options
 
As of          , 2008, options to purchase a total of           shares of Class A common stock were outstanding. All of the shares subject to options are subject to lock-up agreements. An additional          shares of Class A common stock were available for future option grants under our stock plans.
 
Upon completion of this offering, we intend to file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering all shares of common stock subject to outstanding options or issuable pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. Shares registered under this registration statement will be available for sale in the open market, subject to Rule 144 volume limitations applicable to affiliates, vesting restrictions with us or the contractual restrictions described below.
 
Lock-up Agreements
 
Our officers, directors and substantially all of our stockholders, who hold an aggregate of approximately           shares of our Class A common stock and           shares of our Class B common stock, have agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, or enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of common stock for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus, without the prior written consent of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. We have also agreed not to waive the provision of our certificate of incorporation relating to restrictions on transfer for a period of 180 days from the date of this prospectus without first obtaining the written consent of the representatives.
 
Of the shares to be released,           shares will be eligible for sale, in some cases subject only to the volume, manner of sale and notice requirements of Rule 144. In addition, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated may in their sole discretion choose to release any or all of these shares from these restrictions prior to the 180-day period.


101


Table of Contents

 
UNDERWRITING
 
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated are acting as representatives of the underwriters named below. Under the terms and subject to the conditions described in an underwriting agreement among us, the selling stockholders and the underwriters, the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the underwriters, and the underwriters severally have agreed to purchase from the selling stockholders, the number of shares indicated below.
 
         
    Number of
 
Underwriter
  Shares  
 
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated
                
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
       
         
Total
       
         
 
The underwriters have agreed to purchase all of the shares of Class A common stock if any of these shares are purchased. If an underwriter defaults, the underwriting agreement provides that the purchase commitments of the non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated.
 
The underwriters are offering the shares, subject to prior sale, when, as and if transferred to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by their counsel, including the validity of the shares, and other conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, such as the receipt by the underwriters of officers’ certificates and legal opinions.
 
Indemnification
 
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against some liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of those liabilities to the extent set forth in the underwriting agreement.
 
Over-allotment Option
 
Some of the selling stockholders have granted the underwriters options to purchase up to           additional shares of our Class A common stock, at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise these options for 30 days from the date of this prospectus solely to cover any over-allotments. If the underwriters exercise these options, each will be obligated, subject to conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, to purchase a number of additional shares from the selling stockholders proportionate to that underwriter’s initial amount reflected in the above table.
 
Commissions and Discounts
 
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of Class A common stock to the public at the public offering price on the cover page of this prospectus and to dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $      per share. The underwriters may allow, and the dealers may re-allow, a discount not in excess of $      per share to other dealers. After the public offering, the public offering price, concession and discount may be changed.


102


Table of Contents

The following table shows the per share initial public offering price, underwriting discount and proceeds before expenses to the selling stockholders. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
 
                         
    Per Share     Without Option     With Option  
 
Public offering price
  $                $                $             
Underwriting discount
  $       $       $    
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders
  $       $       $  
 
Our expenses related to the offering, not including the underwriting discount, are estimated to be $     .
 
Lock-up Agreements
 
We and substantially all our stockholders have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of or hedge any shares of Class A common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into our Class A common stock for at least 180 days after the date of this prospectus without first obtaining the written consent of the representatives. We have also agreed not to waive the provision of our certificate of incorporation relating to restrictions on transfer for a period of 180 days from the date of this prospectus.
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the 180th day after the date of this prospectus occurs within 17 days following an earnings release by us or the occurrence of material news or a material event related to us, or if we intend to issue an earnings release within 16 days following the 180th day, the 180-day period will be extended to the 18th day following such earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event, unless such extension is waived by the representatives.
 
These lockup agreements also apply to Class A common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into our Class A common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into our Class A common stock owned now or acquired later by the person executing the agreement or for which the person executing the agreement later acquires the power of disposition.
 
Listing
 
We have applied to list our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “          .”
 
Offering Price Determination
 
Before the offering, there has been no public market for our Class A common stock. The initial public offering price will be determined through negotiations among us, the representatives of the selling stockholders and the underwriters. In addition to prevailing market conditions, the factors considered in determining the initial public offering price will be:
 
  •      the valuation multiples of publicly traded companies that the representatives believe to be comparable with us;
 
  •      our financial information;
 
  •      the history of, and the prospects for, our company and the industry in which we compete;
 
  •      an assessment of our management, our past and present operations, and the prospects for, and timing of, our future revenues;
 
  •      the present state of our business; and
 
  •      the factors listed above in relation to market values and various valuation measures of other companies engaged in activities similar to ours.


103


Table of Contents

An active trading market for our shares may not develop. It is also possible that after the offering the shares will not trade in the public market at or above the public offering price.
 
Discretionary Sales
 
The underwriters do not expect to sell more than 5% of the shares in the aggregate to accounts over which they exercise discretionary authority.
 
Price Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids
 
Until the distribution of the shares is completed, Securities and Exchange Commission rules may limit the ability of the underwriters and selling group members from bidding for and purchasing our Class A common stock. However, the representatives may engage in transactions that stabilize the price of our Class A common stock, such as bids or purchases to peg, fix or maintain that price.
 
If the underwriters create a short position in the Class A common stock in connection with the offering, i.e., if they sell more shares than are listed on the cover of this prospectus, the representatives may elect to reduce any short position by purchasing shares in the open market. The representatives may also elect to reduce any short position by exercising all or part of the over-allotment option described above. The underwriters may sell more shares than could be covered by exercising all of the over-allotment option, in which case they would have to cover these sales through open market purchases. Purchases of the Class A common stock to stabilize its price or to reduce a short position may cause the price of the Class A common stock to be higher than it might be in the absence of such purchases.
 
The representatives may also impose a penalty bid on underwriters and selling group members. This means that if the representatives purchase our Class A common stock in the open market to reduce the underwriters’ short position or to stabilize the price of such Class A common stock, they may reclaim the amount of the selling concession from the underwriters and selling group members who sold those shares. The imposition of a penalty bid may also affect the price of the shares in that it discourages resales of shares.
 
Neither we nor any of the underwriters makes any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our Class A common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters makes any representation that the representatives will engage in these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.
 
Electronic Prospectus Delivery
 
In connection with this offering, prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the internet sites or through other online services maintained by one or more of the underwriters participating in this offering, or by their affiliates. In those cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online. Depending upon the particular underwriter, prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such allocation for online distributions will be made on the same basis as other allocations.
 
Other than this prospectus in electronic format, the information concerning any underwriter’s web site and any information contained in any other web site maintained by an underwriter is not intended to be part of this prospectus or the registration statement, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or any underwriter in its capacity as underwriter. Investors should not rely on such information.
 
Other Relationships
 
Each of the underwriters and their affiliates have engaged in, and may in the future engage in, investment banking and other commercial dealings in the ordinary course of business with us. They have received, and they will in the future receive, customary fees and commissions for these transactions.


104


Table of Contents

Sales in Other Jurisdictions
 
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, or a Relevant Member State, each underwriter represents and agrees that with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State, or the Relevant Implementation Date, it has not made and will not make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
 
  •      to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
 
  •      to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average of at least 250 employees during the last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than €43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more than €50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts;
 
  •      to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive) subject to obtaining the prior content of the manager for any such offer; or
 
  •      in any other circumstances which do not require the publication by us of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
 
For the purposes of this provision, (i) the expression an “offer of shares to the public” in relation to any shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State and (ii) the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in such Relevant Member State.
 
We have been advised by the underwriters that:
 
  •      they have complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, or FSMA, with respect to anything done by them in relation to our common stock in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom; they have only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the FSMA) received by them in connection with the issue or sale of our common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to us; and
 
  •      they and each of their affiliates have not (i) offered or sold and will not offer or sell in Hong Kong, by means of any document, our common stock other than (a) to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong and any rules made under that Ordinance or (b) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a “prospectus” as defined in the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) of Hong Kong or which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of that Ordinance or (ii) issued or had in their possession for the purposes of issue, and will not issue or have in their possession for the purposes of issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere, any advertisement, invitation or document relating to our common stock, which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public of Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to our common stock which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance and any rules made under that Ordinance. The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority


105


Table of Contents

  in Hong Kong. You are advised to exercise caution in relation to the offer. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice.
 
VALIDITY OF COMMON STOCK
 
The validity of the issuance of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for the Company by Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, New York. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York, is representing the underwriters.
 
EXPERTS
 
The consolidated financial statements of Insurance Services Office, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, included in this prospectus and the related financial statement schedule included elsewhere in the registration statement, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein and elsewhere in the registration statement (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132 (R) ). Such financial statements and financial statement schedule have been included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
The balance sheet of Verisk Analytics, Inc. as of June 30, 2008 included in this prospectus has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein and elsewhere in the registration statement. Such balance sheet is included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
The consolidated financial statements of Xactware, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the years then ended, appearing in this prospectus and registration statement have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
 
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock offered hereby. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the related exhibits and schedules. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document are not necessarily complete and in each instance, if such contract or document is filed as an exhibit, please refer to the copy of such document, as each statement is qualified in all respects by such reference. You may read and copy the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The address of that site is www.sec.gov.
 
As a result of the offering, we will become subject to the full informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We will fulfill our obligations with respect to such requirements by filing periodic reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We intend to furnish our stockholders with annual reports containing consolidated financial statements certified by an independent registered public accounting firm. We also maintain an internet site at www.verisk.com. Our website and the information contained in it or connected to it shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this prospectus or the registration statement.


106


 

 
VERISK ANALYTICS, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
         
    Page
 
Insurance Services Office, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2008 and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 (unaudited)
       
    F-2  
    F-3  
    F-4  
    F-5  
    F-7  
Verisk Analytics, Inc. Financial Statement as of June 30, 2008
       
    F-28  
    F-29  
    F-30  
Insurance Services Office, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
       
    F-31  
    F-32  
    F-33  
    F-34  
    F-35  
    F-37  
Xactware Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2006 and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2006 (unaudited)
       
    F-83  
    F-84  
    F-85  
    F-86  
Xactware Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
       
    F-91  
    F-92  
    F-93  
    F-94  
    F-95  
    F-96  


F-1


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008
 
                 
          June 30,
 
    December 31,
    2008
 
    2007     unaudited  
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data)  
ASSETS
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 24,049     $ 50,835  
Available-for-sale securities
    28,350       6,434  
Accounts receivable, net (including amounts from related parties of $949 and $2,452, respectively)
    86,488       90,364  
Notes receivable from stockholders
    347       9,879  
Prepaid expenses
    7,609       14,751  
Deferred income taxes
    22,654       22,654  
Federal and state taxes receivable
    3,003       14,148  
Other current assets
    8,525       15,556  
                 
Total current assets
    181,025       224,621  
Noncurrent assets:
               
Fixed assets, net
    85,436       88,190  
Intangible assets, net
    141,160       119,214  
Goodwill
    339,891       362,354  
Notes receivable from stockholders
    12,356        
Deferred income taxes
    55,679       69,820  
Other assets
    12,936       2,640  
                 
Total assets
  $ 828,483     $ 866,839  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  $ 78,234     $ 65,259  
Acquisition related liabilities
    100,300       11,850  
Short-term debt
    35,171       190,192  
Pension and postretirement benefits, current
    4,636       4,733  
Fees received in advance (including amounts from related parties of $5,817 and $10,821, respectively)
    127,907       177,058  
                 
Total current liabilities
    346,248       449,092  
Noncurrent liabilities:
               
Long-term debt
    403,159       451,990  
Pension benefits
    17,637       51,556  
Postretirement benefits
    23,894       23,044  
Other liabilities
    62,085       63,817  
                 
Total liabilities
    853,023       1,039,499  
Redeemable common stock:
               
Class A redeemable common stock, stated at redemption value, $.01 par value; 6,700,000 shares authorized; 2,922,253 and 2,999,939 shares issued and 1,163,066 and 946,518 outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively
    1,217,942       1,058,631  
Class A unearned KSOP shares
    (4,129 )     (3,751 )
Notes receivable from stockholders
    (42,625 )     (48,593 )
                 
Total redeemable common stock
    1,171,188       1,006,287  
Commitments and contingencies
               
Stockholders’ deficit :
               
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 10,004,500 shares issued and 2,873,412 and 2,863,742 outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively
    100       100  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (8,699 )     (29,915 )
Accumulated deficit
    (508,136 )     (465,138 )
Class B common stock, treasury stock, 7,131,088 and 7,140,758 shares in 2007 and 2008, respectively
    (678,993 )     (683,994 )
                 
Total stockholders’ deficit
    (1,195,728 )     (1,178,947 )
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
  $ 828,483     $ 866,839  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


F-2


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
 
                 
    June 30,
    June 30,
 
    2007     2008  
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data)  
 
Revenues (including revenues from related parties of $43,156 and $43,189 for 2007 and 2008, respectively)
  $ 399,988     $ 437,690  
Expenses:
               
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)
    176,502       190,678  
Selling, general and administrative
    55,600       59,028  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    15,498       16,424  
Amortization of intangible assets
    17,240       14,937  
                 
Total expenses
    264,840       281,067  
                 
Operating income
    135,148       156,623  
Other income/(expense):
               
Investment income
    4,392       1,617  
Realized gains/(losses) on securities, net
    592       (1,286 )
Interest expense
    (11,474 )     (14,173 )
Other expense
    (21 )     (14 )
                 
Total other expense, net
    (6,511 )     (13,856 )
                 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    128,637       142,767  
Provision for income taxes
    (52,432 )     (61,818 )
                 
Income from continuing operations
    76,205       80,949  
                 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $423 in 2007
    (1,302 )      
                 
Net income
  $ 74,903     $ 80,949  
                 
Basic income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B:
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 18.69     $ 21.73  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (0.32 )      
                 
Net income per share
  $ 18.37     $ 21.73  
                 
Diluted income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B:
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 17.97     $ 20.87  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (0.31 )      
                 
Net income per share
  $ 17.66     $ 20.87  
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
               
Basic
    4,077,259       3,724,876  
                 
Diluted
    4,240,053       3,877,906  
                 
Pro forma basic income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B (unaudited):
               
Income from continuing operations
               
Loss from discontinued operations
               
                 
Pro forma net income per share
               
                 
Pro forma diluted income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B (unaudited):
               
Income from continuing operations
               
Loss from discontinued operations
               
                 
Pro forma net income per share
               
                 
Weighted average shares used in pro forma per share amounts:
               
Basic
               
                 
Diluted
               
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


F-3


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(UNAUDITED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
 
                                                 
          Accumulated
                         
          Other
                      Total
 
    Accumulated
    Comprehensive
    Class B Common Stock     Treasury
    Stockholders’
 
    Deficit     Loss     Shares     Par Value     Stock     Deficit  
    (In thousands, except for share data)  
 
Balance, January 1, 2007
  $ (457,557 )   $ (16,017 )     10,004,500     $ 100     $ (642,883 )   $ (1,116,357 )
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
    150,374                               150,374  
Other comprehensive gains
          7,318                         7,318  
                                                 
Comprehensive income
                                  157,692  
Treasury stock acquired — Class B common stock
                            (36,110 )     (36,110 )
Stock options exercised for 72,083 shares (including tax benefit of $12,798)
    (36,655 )                             (36,655 )
Cumulative effect adjustment to adopt FIN No. 48
    (10,338 )                             (10,338 )
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
    (153,960 )                             (153,960 )
                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2007
  $ (508,136 )   $ (8,699 )     10,004,500     $ 100     $ (678,993 )   $ (1,195,728 )
                                                 
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
    80,949                               80,949  
Other comprehensive losses
          (21,216 )                       (21,216 )
                                                 
Comprehensive income
                                  59,733  
Treasury stock acquired — Class B common stock
                            (5,001 )     (5,001 )
Stock options exercised for 77,686 shares (including tax benefit of $17,032)
    (10,660 )                             (10,660 )
Decrease in redemption value of Class A common stock
    (27,291 )                             (27,291 )
                                                 
Balance, June 30, 2008
  $ (465,138 )   $ (29,915 )     10,004,500     $ 100     $ (683,994 )   $ (1,178,947 )
                                                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


F-4


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
 
                 
    June 30,
    June 30,
 
    2007     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 74,903     $ 80,949  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    15,546       16,424  
Amortization of intangible assets
    17,240       14,937  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    1,006       1,093  
KSOP compensation expense
    10,899       11,564  
Acquisition related compensation expense
    2,426       550  
Stock-based compensation
    3,756       4,621  
Non-cash charges associated with other employee compensation plans
    1,387       2,327  
Accrued interest on notes receivable from stockholders
    (1,129 )     (980 )
Non-cash charges associated with the valuation of covered call options
    291        
Realized (gains)/losses on securities
    (592 )     1,286  
Other operating
          30  
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
    1,416        
Excess tax benefits from stock options exercised
    (12,428 )     (17,032 )
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions:
               
Accounts receivable
    (4,170 )     (4,937 )
Federal and state taxes receivable
    6,294       5,352  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (5,182 )     (4,426 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    (15,888 )     (16,088 )
Acquisition related liabilities
    (14,007 )     (2,200 )
Fees received in advance
    34,777       49,151  
Other liabilities
    591       (692 )
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    117,136       141,929  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


F-5


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued) (UNAUDITED)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
 
                 
    June 30, 2007     June 30, 2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Acquisitions
    (713 )     (41 )
Earnout payments
    (2,590 )     (98,100 )
Proceeds from release of contingent escrows
    86       549  
Acquisition related escrow distributions
          (3,320 )
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
    (41,571 )     (78 )
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities
    20,016       21,457  
Purchases of fixed assets
    (23,050 )     (17,810 )
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable from stockholders
    37       184  
Issuance of notes receivable from stockholders
    (1,618 )     (1,243 )
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (49,403 )     (98,402 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
          150,000  
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt
    55,000       70,000  
Redemption of Class A common stock
    (89,900 )     (232,144 )
Repurchase of Class B common stock
    (2,506 )     (5,001 )
Repayment of short-term debt
    (102,564 )     (17,587 )
Excess tax benefits from stock options exercised
    12,428       17,032  
Proceeds from exercises of stock options
    348       941  
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (127,194 )     (16,759 )
                 
Effect of exchange rate changes
    135       18  
                 
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (59,326 )     26,786  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    99,152       24,049  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 39,826     $ 50,835  
                 
Supplemental disclosures:
               
Taxes paid
  $ 45,715     $ 55,127  
Interest paid
  $ 11,634     $ 12,609  
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Loans made to directors and officers in connection with the exercise of stock options
  $ 13,190     $ 20,148  
                 
Redemption of Class A common stock used to repay notes receivable from stockholders
  $ 20,874     $ 18,663  
                 
Redemption of Class A common stock used to fund the exercise of stock options
  $ 2,752     $ 2,827  
                 
KSOP stock redemption funded in the prior year
  $ 2,643     $  
                 
Purchase of fixed assets funded through capital lease
  $ 566     $ 1,368  
                 
Accrual of acquisition related liabilities
  $ 49,293     $ 11,300  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


F-6


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands, except for share and per share data, unless otherwise stated)
 
1.   Organization:
 
Insurance Services Office, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) enable risk-bearing businesses to better understand and manage their risks. The Company provides its customers proprietary data that, combined with analytic methods, creates embedded decision support solutions. The Company is one of the largest aggregators and providers of data pertaining to U.S. property and casualty (“P&C”) or P&C insurance risks. The Company offers solutions for detecting fraud in the U.S. P&C insurance, mortgage and healthcare industries and sophisticated methods to predict and quantify loss in diverse contexts ranging from natural catastrophes to health insurance. The Company provides solutions, including data, statistical models or tailored analytics, all designed to allow clients to make more logical decisions.
 
The Company was formed in 1971 as an advisory and rating organization for the P&C insurance industry to provide statistical and actuarial services, to develop insurance programs and to assist insurance companies in meeting state regulatory requirements. Over the past decade, the Company has broadened its data assets, entered new markets, placed a greater emphasis on analytics, and pursued strategic acquisitions.
 
On June 27, 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved certain corporate governance changes necessary to allow the Company to proceed with a proposed initial public offering (“IPO”). Immediately prior to the completion of the proposed IPO, the Company will undergo a corporate reorganization whereby the Class A and Class B common stock of the Company will be exchanged by the current stockholders for the common stock of Verisk Analytics, Inc. (“Verisk”) on a one-for-one basis. Verisk, formed on May 23, 2008, was established to serve as the parent holding company of Insurance Services Office, Inc.
 
All stock options granted under the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan will be transferred to Verisk, without modification to the terms of the options other than such options will be exercisable for Class A common stock of Verisk. Class A common stock of Verisk will not be redeemable by the holder and only Class A common stock will be offered to the public.
 
Upon consummation of the IPO, two new series of Class B common stock, Class B (Series 1) common stock (the “Class B-1”) and Class B (Series 2) common stock (the “Class B-2”) will be formed and 50 percent of each Class B stockholders’ existing Class B common stock will be converted into shares of new Class B-1 common stock and the remaining 50 percent of each Class B stockholders’ existing Class B common stock will be converted into shares of new Class B-2 common stock. Each share of Class B-1 common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the stockholder, into one share of Class A common stock 18 months after the date of the IPO. Each share of Class B-2 common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the stockholder, into one share of Class A common stock 30 months after the date of the IPO. In conjunction with the IPO, Verisk plans to effect a stock split of both classes of common stock. The strike price of stock options will be adjusted based on the effect of the stock split.
 
2.   Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
 
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates include acquisition purchase price allocations, the fair value of goodwill, the realization of deferred tax assets, acquisition related liabilities, fair value of stock based compensation, liabilities for pension and postretirement benefits, fair value of the Company’s common stock, and the estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates.
 
The condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal


F-7


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
recurring accruals, to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The financial statements and related notes for the six months ended June 30, 2008 have been prepared on the same basis as and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to keep the information presented from being misleading.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards , (“EITF No. 06-11”), that an entity should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on affected securities charged to retained earnings as an increase in Additional Paid in Capital (“APIC”). The amount recognized in APIC should be included in the APIC pool. When an entity’s estimate of forfeitures increases or actual forfeitures exceed its estimates, the amount of tax benefits previously recognized in APIC should be reclassified into the statement of operations. The amount reclassified is limited to the APIC pool balance on the reclassification date. EITF No. 06-11 applies prospectively to the income tax benefits of dividends declared on affected securities. The adoption of EITF No. 06-11, effective January 1, 2008, did not have an impact on the financial statements as the Company does not currently pay dividends on its common stock.
 
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”) No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“FAS No. 141(R)”). FAS No. 141(R) replaces FAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“FAS No. 141”). FAS No. 141(R) primarily requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, measured at their fair values as of that date. This replaces FAS No. 141’s cost-allocation process, which required the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Generally, FAS No. 141(R) will become effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, except for tax provisions which apply to business combinations regardless of acquisition date. The majority of the impact of adopting FAS No. 141(R) will be dependent on the business combinations that the Company may pursue and complete after its effective date. The Company is currently evaluating any impact related to the accounting for tax contingencies for business combinations completed prior to the effective date and the related impact on the consolidated financial statements.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51, (“FAS No. 160”). FAS No. 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be identified in the consolidated financial statements. It also calls for consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. FAS No. 160 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 except the presentation and disclosure requirements, which are required to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Earlier adoption of FAS No. 160 is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of FAS No. 160 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP FAS No. 157-2”), which delays the effective date of FAS No. 157, Fair Value


F-8


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
Instruments , for non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Non-financial assets and liabilities include, among others: intangible assets acquired through business combinations; long-lived assets when assessing potential impairment; and liabilities associated with restructuring activities. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of FSP FAS No. 157-2 for non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities will have, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — An Amendment of FAS No. 133 (“FAS No. 161”). FAS No. 161 seeks to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures regarding their impact on financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. To achieve this increased transparency, FAS No. 161 requires the disclosure of the fair value of derivative instruments and gains and losses in a tabular format; the disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk-related; and cross-referencing within the footnotes. FAS No. 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of FAS No. 161 will have, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP No. 142-3”). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“FAS No. 142”) . The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141(R), and other U.S. GAAP. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is evaluating the potential impact, if any, the adoption of FSP No. 142-3 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
3.   Concentration of Credit Risk:
 
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities and accounts receivable, which are generally not collateralized. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with higher credit quality financial institutions in order to limit the amount of credit exposure. The total cash balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to a maximum amount of $100 per bank. At June 30, 2008, the Company had cash balances on deposit with five banks that exceeded the balance insured by the FDIC limit by approximately $38,764. At June 30, 2008 the Company also had cash on deposit with foreign banks of approximately $11,592.
 
The Company considers the concentration of credit risk associated with its trade accounts receivable to be commercially reasonable and believes that such concentration does not result in the significant risk of near-term severe adverse impacts. The Company’s top fifty customers for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008, represent approximately 45% and 43% of revenue, respectively, with no individual customer accounting for more than 4% of revenue during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008. No individual customer comprised more than 10% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008.


F-9


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
4.   Accounts Receivables:
 
Accounts receivables consist of the following:
 
                 
    December 31,
    June 30,
 
    2007     2008  
 
Billed receivables
  $ 88,370     $ 93,977  
Unbilled receivables
    6,365       3,808  
                 
Total receivables
    94,735       97,785  
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
    (8,247 )     (7,421 )
                 
Accounts receivable, net
  $ 86,488     $ 90,364  
                 
 
5.   Notes Receivable from Stockholders:
 
Notes receivable from stockholders consists of recourse loans issued by the Company to directors and senior management in connection with exercising stock options. These loans for the exercise price are classified as a component of “Redeemable common stock” on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. These loans may also include loans for the tax liability and accrued interest incurred in connection with exercising stock options and these loans are included in “Notes receivable from stockholders” as a component of total assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008 approximately $55,328 and $58,472, respectively, of notes receivable from stockholders were outstanding. These notes were issued at rates approximating market rates of interest. Payments of principal and interest related to the notes are generally deferred until the end of the loan terms, which range from three to nine years. Interest income on notes receivable from stockholders was $1,129 and $980 during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, $2,776 and $2,872, respectively, of notes receivable from stockholders had maturities of one year or less. As of June 30, 2008 the Company reclassified an additional $8,582 of notes receivable from stockholders from long-term to current as the loan program was terminated and the outstanding loans repaid in August 2008, with the exception of $722.
 
6.   Investments:
 
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities:
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
          Unrealized
    Unrealized
       
December 31, 2007
  Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
Registered investment companies
  $ 29,036     $      —     $   (686 )   $ 28,350  
                                 
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
          Unrealized
    Unrealized
       
June 30, 2008
  Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
Registered investment companies
  $  6,370     $      64     $      —     $  6,434  
                                 
 
Proceeds from sales of investments were $20,016 and $21,457 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Realized gains and losses on registered investment companies for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 were $592 and ($1,286), respectively.
 
Investment income during the six months ended June 30, 2007 includes interest income from cash and cash equivalents, interest income from notes receivable from stockholders, and dividend income from investments of $2,850, $1,129 and $164, respectively. Investment income during the six months ended


F-10


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
June 30, 2008 includes interest income from cash and cash equivalents, interest income from notes receivable from stockholders, and dividend income from investments of $494, $980, and $143, respectively.
 
From time to time, the Company has entered into certain derivative transactions involving covered call options on underlying investments held by the Company. As of June 30, 2007, the fair value of the derivative liability associated with the covered call options was $291, which was recognized as a reduction to “Investment income” in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The gain on call premiums of $540 was recognized as investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The Company did not enter into any derivative transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
 
7.   Fair Value Measurements:
 
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements , (“FAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP and expands fair value measurement disclosures. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of FAS No. 157 until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at least annually. Therefore, effective January 1, 2008 the Company has adopted the provisions of FAS No. 157 only for its financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis.
 
To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measures, FAS No. 157 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in valuation techniques between observable inputs that reflect quoted prices in active markets, inputs other than quoted prices with observable market data, and unobservable data (e.g., a company’s own data). FAS No. 157 requires disclosures detailing the extent to which companies’ measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the methods and assumptions used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. In accordance with FAS No. 157, the Company applied the following fair value hierarchy:
 
Level 1 — Assets or liabilities for which the identical item is traded on an active exchange, such as publicly-traded instruments.
 
Level 2 — Assets and liabilities valued based on observable market data for similar instruments.
 
Level 3 — Assets or liabilities for which significant valuation assumptions are not readily observable in the market; instruments valued based on the best available data, some of which is internally-developed, and considers risk premiums that a market participant would require.
 
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at June 30, 2008 for assets and other balances measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
                                 
          Quoted Prices
             
          in Active Markets
    Significant Other
    Significant
 
    June 30,
    for Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
 
    2008     Assets (Level 1)     Inputs (Level 2)     Inputs (Level 3)  
 
Available-for-sale securities(1)
  $ 6,434     $     6,434     $        —     $  
Redeemable common stock(2)
    1,058,631                   1,058,631  
 
 
(1) Available-for-sale equity securities are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares owned.


F-11


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
 
(2) The fair value of the Company’s Class A redeemable common stock is established for purposes of the ISO 401(K) Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “KSOP”) on the final day of the quarter and such price is utilized for all share transactions in the subsequent quarter. The current valuation in effect for the KSOP is also considered the fair value for Class A redeemable common stock and related transactions within the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan. See Note 12 for a description of the valuation process and a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for the redeemable common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
 
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“FAS No. 159”). FAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses are reported in earnings for items measured using the fair value option. The Company has elected not to apply the fair value option to its eligible financial assets and liabilities, and accordingly, the adoption of FAS No. 159 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.
 
8.   Goodwill and Intangible Assets:
 
The following is a summary of the change in goodwill from December 31, 2007 through June 30, 2008, both in total and as allocated to the Company’s operating segments:
 
                         
    Risk
    Decision
       
    Assessment     Analytics     Total  
 
Goodwill at December 31, 2007
  $ 27,908     $ 311,983     $ 339,891  
Escrow distribution
          3,320       3,320  
Accrual of acquisition related liabilities
          11,300       11,300  
Finalization of purchase accounting
          7,843       7,843  
                         
Goodwill at June 30, 2008
  $ 27,908     $ 334,446     $ 362,354  
                         
 
As of June 30, 2008, the Company finalized the purchase price allocation associated with the acquisitions of HealthCare, Insight, LLC (“HCI”) and NIA Consulting, LTD (“NIA”). The finalization of the purchase accounting for HCI resulted in a reduction primarily of customer-related intangible assets and corresponding increase to goodwill of $7,009, and the final working capital adjustment of $825. The finalization of the purchase accounting for NIA, which includes the final working capital and other adjustments resulted in an increase to goodwill of $9.
 
In April 2008, the Company paid $98,100 for Xactware contingent payments previously recorded within “Acquisition related liabilities.” Certain other acquisitions include contingent payment provisions that are not related to continuing employment and are payable upon the achievement of certain financial results for 2008. As of June 30, 2008, based on estimated 2008 operating results, the Company has recorded an increase to goodwill and a corresponding increase to “Acquisition related liabilities” of $11,300 for contingent payments that are probable.


F-12


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, the Company’s intangible assets and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following:
 
                                 
    Weighted
                   
    Average
          Accumulated
       
December 31, 2007
  Useful Life     Cost     Amortization     Net  
 
Technology-based
    5 years     $ 164,317     $ (80,419 )   $ 83,898  
Marketing-related
    4 years       25,846       (13,667 )     12,179  
Contract-based
    6 years       6,555       (5,596 )     959  
Customer-related
    13 years       57,906       (13,782 )     44,124  
                                 
Total intangible assets
          $ 254,624     $ (113,464 )   $ 141,160  
                                 
 
                                 
    Weighted
                   
    Average
          Accumulated
       
June 30, 2008
  Useful Life     Cost     Amortization     Net  
 
Technology-based
    5 years     $ 164,128     $ (90,345 )   $ 73,783  
Marketing-related
    4 years       25,846       (15,818 )     10,028  
Contract-based
    6 years       6,555       (5,843 )     712  
Customer-related
    13 years       51,086       (16,395 )     34,691  
                                 
Total intangible assets
          $ 247,615     $ (128,401 )   $ 119,214  
                                 
 
Consolidated amortization expense related to intangible assets for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, was approximately $17,240 and $14,937, respectively. Estimated amortization expense through 2012 and thereafter for intangible assets subject to amortization is as follows:
 
         
Year
  Amount  
 
2008 (remainder of)
  $ 14,212  
2009
    27,232  
2010
    22,034  
2011
    15,816  
2012
    13,675  
Thereafter
    26,245  
 
9.   Acquisitions and Discontinued Operations:
 
On January 11, 2007, the Company acquired the remaining 20% of the stock of National Equipment Register (“NER”), resulting in 100% ownership, in order to more closely align operations with existing businesses. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for 2007 and 2008. NER is a provider of solutions to increase the recovery rate of stolen equipment and reduce the costs associated with theft for owners and insurers.
 
On March 23, 2007, the Company acquired the rights, title, the name, trade name, and service mark, “Rex Depot” and other intangible assets of Smith Sekelsky Web Products, LLC. The assets associated with this acquisition further enhance the capability of the Company’s appraisal software offerings.
 
In 2007, the Company discontinued operations of its claims consulting business located in New Hope, PA and the United Kingdom. The results for this business were accounted for as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2007. There was no impact of discontinued operations on the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The summarized,


F-13


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
combined statements of income from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is as follows:
 
         
    June 30,
 
    2007  
 
Revenues
  $ 1,650  
         
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
  $ (1,725 )
Income tax benefit
    423  
         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
  $ (1,302 )
         
 
Depreciation expense related to the discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $48.
 
10.   Income Taxes:
 
The Company’s annual estimated effective tax rate for fiscal year 2007 is 40.0% compared to the estimated effective tax rate for fiscal year 2008 of 42.3%.
 
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN No. 48, which prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. For each tax position, the Company must determine whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is then measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize within the financial statements. No benefits may be recognized for tax positions that do not meet the more likely than not threshold.
 
Included in the total unrecognized tax benefits of $32,030 at June 30, 2008 was $24,368 that, if recognized, would have a favorable effect on the Company’s effective tax rate. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and penalties associated with income taxes as a component of income tax expense. At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, approximately $7,033 and $8,371, respectively, was accrued in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet for the payment of interest and penalties associated with income taxes. The Company files federal income tax returns in the U.S. and various state, local and foreign income tax returns. All of the U.S. federal, state and local income tax returns filed by the Company are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and the state and local tax authorities until the expiration of the relevant statute of limitations.


F-14


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
11.   Debt:
 
The following table presents short-term and long-term debt by issuance:
 
                                 
    Issuance
    Maturity
    December 31,
    June 30,
 
    Date     Date     2007     2008  
 
Short-term debt:
                               
Bank of America
    10/25/2007       4/25/2008     $ 15,000     $  
Bank of America
    4/25/2008       7/25/2008             15,000  
Bank of America
    6/16/2008       7/16/2008             10,000  
JPMorgan Chase
    12/31/2007       1/3/2008       15,000        
JPMorgan Chase
    6/30/2008       7/30/2008             20,000  
JPMorgan Chase
    6/27/2008       7/11/2008             20,000  
Citibank
    6/13/2008       7/14/2008             20,000  
Prudential: 4.46% Series D senior notes
    6/14/2005       6/13/2009             100,000  
Capital lease obligations
    Various       Various       4,408       4,734  
Other
    Various       Various       763       458  
                                 
Short-term debt
                  $ 35,171     $ 190,192  
                                 
Long-term debt:
                               
Prudential senior notes:
                               
4.46% Series D senior notes
    6/14/2005       6/13/2009     $ 100,000     $  
4.60% Series E senior notes
    6/14/2005       6/13/2011       50,000       50,000  
6.00% Series F senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2011       25,000       25,000  
6.13% Series G senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2013       75,000       75,000  
5.84% Series H senior notes
    10/26/2007       10/26/2013       17,500       17,500  
5.84% Series H senior notes
    10/26/2007       10/26/2015       17,500       17,500  
6.28% Series I senior notes
    4/29/2008       4/29/2013             15,000  
6.28% Series I senior notes
    4/29/2008       4/29/2015             85,000  
Principal senior notes:
                               
6.03% Series A senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2011       50,000       50,000  
6.16% Series B senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2013       25,000       25,000  
New York Life senior notes:
                               
5.87% Series A senior notes
    3/16/2007       10/26/2013       17,500       17,500  
5.87% Series A senior notes
    3/16/2007       10/26/2015       17,500       17,500  
6.35% Series B senior notes
    4/29/2008       4/29/2015             50,000  
Other obligations:
                               
Capital lease obligations
    Various       Various       7,299       6,145  
Other
    Various       Various       860       845  
                                 
Long-term debt
                  $ 403,159     $ 451,990  
                                 
 
Accrued interest associated with the Company’s outstanding master shelf debt obligations was $2,548 and $4,138 as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively. Consolidated interest expense associated


F-15


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
with the Company’s outstanding master shelf debt obligations was $11,474 and $14,173 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company utilized additional short-term borrowings from revolving credit facilities with Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Citibank to repurchase Class A common stock. As of June 30, 2008, the interest on the outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facilities with Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Citibank is payable monthly at weighted average rates of 4.24%, 3.63% and 3.78%, respectively.
 
The Company had $85,000 of short-term borrowings that matured in July 2008. The Company repaid $30,000 of their outstanding short-term debt balance in July 2008. The Company renewed $55,000 of the short-term debt at various interest rates ranging from 2.65% to 3.14%. These borrowings mature at various times ranging from August 1, 2008 through October 13, 2008.
 
12.   Redeemable Common Stock:
 
On November 18, 1996, the Company authorized 6,700,000 shares of Class A redeemable common stock. The Class A stock is reserved for the use in incentive plans for key employees and directors under the Option Plan, and for issuance to the ISO 401(k) Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “KSOP”). The Class A stock has voting rights to elect nine of the thirteen members of the board of directors. The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation limits those who may own Class A stock to current and former employees or directors, the KSOP and trusts by or for the benefit of immediate family members of employees and former employees.
 
Under the terms of the Option Plan, Class A stock resulting from exercised options that are held by the employee for more than six months and one day may be put to the Company and redeemed at the then current fair value at the date of the redemption request of the Class A stock. For options granted in 2002 through 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the cash settlement of the redemption up to one year. For options granted after 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the cash settlement of the redemption for up to two years. Under the terms of the KSOP, eligible participants may elect to diversify 100% of their 401(k) and up to 35% of their ESOP contributions that were made in the form of Class A stock. In addition, upon retirement or termination participants in the KSOP are required to liquidate their ownership in Class A common stock. Since the Class A stock distributed under the Option Plan and KSOP is subject to the restrictions above, the participant currently has the right to require the Company to repurchase stock based on the then current fair value of the Class A stock.
 
The fair value of the Company’s Class A redeemable common stock is established for purposes of the KSOP on the final day of the quarter and such price is utilized for all share transactions in the subsequent quarter. The current valuation in effect for the KSOP is also considered fair value for Class A redeemable common stock and related transactions within the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan.
 
The valuation methodology is based on a variety of qualitative and quantitative factors including the nature of the business and history of the enterprise, the economic outlook in general and the condition of the specific industries in which the Company operates, the financial condition of the business, the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow, and goodwill or other intangible asset value. The determination of the fair market value employs both a comparable public company analysis, which examines the valuation multiples of companies deemed comparable, in whole or in part, to the Company and a discounted cash flow analysis that determines a present value of the projected future cash flows of the business. The Company regularly assesses the underlying assumptions used in the valuation methodologies. As a result, the Company has utilized this quarterly fair value for all its Class A redeemable common stock transactions, as required by terms of the KSOP and the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan.


F-16


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
The Company follows SEC Accounting Series Release (“ASR”) No. 268, Presentation in Financial Statements of Preferred Redeemable Stock (“ASR No. 268”). ASR No. 268 requires the Company to record Class A stock and vested stock options at full redemption value at each balance sheet date as the redemption of these securities is not solely within the control of the Company. Redemption value for the Class A stock is determined quarterly for purposes of the KSOP. At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, the fair value was $862 and $892 per share, respectively. The redemption value of the Class A stock at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008 totaled $1,217,942 and $1,058,631, respectively, which includes $215,380 and $213,896, respectively of aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding unexercised vested stock options.
 
During the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, 151,702 and 294,234 Class A shares were redeemed by the Company at a weighted average price of $762.25 and $862.01 per share, respectively. Included in Class A repurchased shares were $13,345 and $20,157 for shares primarily utilized to satisfy minimum tax withholdings on options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
 
Subsequent changes to the redemption value of the securities is charged first to retained earnings; once retained earnings is depleted, then to additional paid-in-capital, if additional paid-in-capital is also depleted, then to accumulated deficit. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 the balance of redeemable common stock decreased by $159,311 primarily due to the redemptions discussed above. Additional information regarding the changes in redeemable common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is provided in the table below.
 
                                                 
                            Notes
    Total
 
    Class A Redeemable Common Stock     Receivable
    Redeemable
 
    Outstanding
    Redemption
    Unearned
    Additional
    from
    Common
 
    Shares     Value     KSOP     Paid in Capital     Stockholders     Stock  
 
Balance, January 1, 2008
    1,163,066     $ 1,217,942     $ (4,129 )   $     $ (42,625 )   $ 1,171,188  
Redemption of Class A common stock
    (294,234 )     (253,635 )                 14,180       (239,455 )
KSOP shares earned
                378       11,186             11,564  
Stock based compensation
                            4,621               4,621  
Stock options exercised (including tax benefit of $17,032)
    77,686       67,033             (15,807 )     (20,148 )     31,078  
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
          27,291                         27,291  
                                                 
Balance, June 30, 2008
    946,518     $ 1,058,631     $ (3,751 )   $     $ (48,593 )   $ 1,006,287  
                                                 
 
13.   Stockholders’ Deficit:
 
On November 18, 1996, the Company authorized 20,000,000 Class B shares. The Class B shares have the same rights as Class A shares with respect to dividends and economic ownership, but have voting rights to elect three of the thirteen directors. The thirteenth seat on the board of directors is held by the chief executive officer of the Company. The Company repurchased 5,475 and 9,670 Class B shares during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 at an average price of $457.78 and $517.20 per share, respectively.
 
Earnings Per Share
 
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, less the weighted average ESOP shares of common stock that have not been committed to be released. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to the computation of basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding using the


F-17


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
treasury stock method, if the dilutive potential common shares, such as stock options, had been issued. The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008:
 
                 
    2007     2008  
 
Numerator used in basic and diluted EPS:
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 76,205     $ 80,949  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
    (1,302 )      
                 
Net income
  $ 74,903     $ 80,949  
                 
Denominator:
               
Weighted average number of common shares used in basic EPS
    4,077,259       3,724,876  
Effect of dilutive shares:
               
Potential Class A redeemable common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
    162,794       153,030  
                 
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares used in diluted EPS
    4,240,053       3,877,906  
                 
Basic EPS:
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 18.69     $ 21.73  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
    (0.32 )      
                 
Basic EPS
  $ 18.37     $ 21.73  
                 
Diluted EPS:
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 17.97     $ 20.87  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
    (0.31 )      
                 
Diluted EPS
  $ 17.66     $ 20.87  
                 
 
The potential shares of common stock that were excluded from diluted earnings per share were 99,170 and 102,511 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, because the effect of including these potential shares was antidilutive.
 
Unaudited pro forma net income/(loss) per share is presented for additional information only. As disclosed in “Note 1 — Organization”, Verisk Analytics, Inc. (“Verisk”) will become the new holding company of Insurance Services Office, Inc. In connection with the initial public offering, the stock of Insurance Services Office, Inc. be exchanged for the stock of Verisk and Verisk plans to affect a stock split of its common stock. Pro forma net income/(loss) per share is computed as if this stock split occurred at the beginning of 2007.


F-18


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
The following is a summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
 
                 
    December 31,
    June 30,
 
    2007     2008  
 
Unrealized (losses)/gains on investments
  $ (412 )   $ 36  
Unrealized foreign currency gains
    154       172  
Pension and postretirement unfunded liability adjustment
    (8,441 )     (30,123 )
                 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  $ (8,699 )   $ (29,915 )
                 
 
The before tax and after tax amounts for these categories, and the related tax benefit (expense) included in other comprehensive loss are summarized below:
 
                         
          Tax
       
          Benefit
       
June 30, 2007
  Before Tax     (Expense)     After Tax  
 
Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the year
  $ 962     $ (375 )   $ 587  
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income
    (843 )     329       (514 )
Unrealized foreign currency gains
    135             135  
Pension and postretirement unfunded liability adjustment
    8,320       (2,799 )     5,521  
                         
Total other comprehensive gain
  $ 8,574     $ (2,845 )   $ 5,729  
                         
June 30, 2008
                       
                         
Unrealized holding losses on investments arising during the year
  $ (370 )   $ 146     $ (224 )
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income
    1,120       (448 )     672  
Unrealized foreign currency gains
    18             18  
Pension and postretirement unfunded liability adjustment
    (35,589 )     13,907       (21,682 )
                         
Total other comprehensive loss
  $ (34,821 )   $ 13,605     $ (21,216 )
                         
 
14.   Stock Option Plan:
 
During 1998, the Company adopted the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan (the “Option Plan”). The Option Plan provides for the granting of options to key employees and directors of the Company. Options granted have varying exercise dates within four years after grant date and expire after ten years. Stock obtained through the exercise of options that are held by the employee for more than six months and one day may be put to the Company and redeemed at the then current fair value of the Class A common stock. For options granted in 2002 through 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the redemption for one year. For options granted after 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the redemption for up to two years. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, stock options granted had an exercise price equal to fair value of the Class A common stock on date of grant. There are 1,992,795 shares of Class A common stock approved for issuance under the plan, of which up to 18,010 options to purchase shares were authorized for future grants at June 30, 2008. Cash received from stock option exercises for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $1,209.


F-19


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
A summary of option activity under the Option Plan as of June 30, 2008, and changes from the year ended December 31, 2007 is presented below:
 
                         
          Weighted
    Aggregate
 
    Number
    Average
    Intrinsic
 
    of Options     Exercise Price     Value  
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    496,753     $ 320.46     $ 269,012  
                         
Granted
    56,990     $ 862.00          
Exercised
    (77,686 )   $ 302.94     $ 43,499  
                         
Cancelled or expired
    (8,688 )   $ 687.64          
                         
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
    467,369     $ 382.58     $ 238,087  
                         
Options exercisable at June 30, 2008
    329,583     $ 243.01     $ 213,896  
                         
 
Exercise prices for options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2008 ranged from $71 to $862 as outlined in the following table:
 
                                                 
    Stock Options Outstanding     Stock Options Exercisable  
    Weighted-
                Weighted-
             
    Average
    Stock
    Weighted-
    Average
    Stock
    Weighted-
 
Range of
  Remaining
    Options
    Average
    Remaining
    Options
    Average
 
Exercise Prices
  Contractual Life     Outstanding     Exercise Price     Contractual Life     Exercisable     Exercise Price  
 
$ 71 to $110
    2.3       77,079     $ 106.43       2.3       77,079     $ 106.43  
$116 to $148
    4.6       45,352     $ 141.90       4.6       45,352     $ 141.90  
$155 to $231
    4.9       113,875     $ 180.27       4.9       113,875     $ 180.27  
$240 to $445
    6.8       88,860     $ 415.87       6.8       66,720     $ 411.41  
$482 to $681
    7.7       42,601     $ 593.15       7.7       17,621     $ 603.57  
$755 to $862
    9.2       99,602     $ 817.38       8.6       8,936     $ 765.57  
                                                 
              467,369                       329,583          
                                                 
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company granted the following stock options with exercise prices and Black-Scholes values as follows:
 
                                 
    Number of
    Fair Value
          Black-Scholes
 
    Stock Options
    of Common
    Exercise
    Value of
 
Grant Dates
  Granted     Stock(1)     Price     Options  
 
March 1, 2008
    56,990     $ 862.00     $ 862.00     $ 204.72  
                                 
 
 
(1) The fair value for these shares is the current valuation in effect for the KSOP. This fair value is also utilized for all Class A share transactions for the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan.


F-20


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
 
The fair value of the stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that used the assumptions noted in the following table.
 
     
    June 30, 2008
 
Option pricing model
  Black-Scholes
Expected volatility
  28.15%
Risk-free interest rate
  2.50%
Expected term in years
  5.1
Dividend yield
  1.90%
Weighted average grant date fair value per stock option
  $204.72
 
The expected term (estimated period of time outstanding) for awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2008 was estimated based on studies of historical experience and projected exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected term of the equity award. Expected volatility for awards prior to January 1, 2008 was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock option’s expected term, ending on the day of grant, and calculated on a quarterly basis for purposes of the KSOP. For awards granted after January 1, 2008, the volatility factor was based on an average of the historical stock prices of a group of the Company’s peers over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the stock option award. The expected dividends yield was based on the Company’s expected annual dividend rate on the date of grant.
 
The Company estimates expected forfeitures of equity awards at the date of grant and recognizes compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Changes in the forfeiture assumptions may impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the requisite service period, and may impact the timing of expense recognized over the requisite service period.
 
As of June 30, 2008, there was $24,477 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Option Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.01 years. The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 was $3,940 and $5,526, respectively.
 
15.   Pension and Postretirement Benefits:
 
Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company maintained a qualified defined benefit pension plan for substantially all of its employees through membership in the Pension Plan for Insurance Organizations (the “Pension Plan”), a multiple-employer trust. The Company has applied the projected unit credit cost method for its pension plan, which attributes an equal portion of total projected benefits to each year of employee service. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company amended the Pension Plan to determine future benefits using a cash balance formula. Under the cash balance formula, each participant has an account which is credited annually based on salary rates determined by years of service, as well as the interest earned on their previous year-end cash balance. Prior to December 31, 2001, pension plan benefits were based on years of service and the average of the five highest consecutive years’ earnings of the last ten years. Effective March 1, 2005, the Company established the Profit Sharing Plan, a defined contribution plan, to replace the Pension Plan for all eligible employees hired on or after March 1, 2005. The Company also has a non-qualified supplemental cash balance plan (“SERP”) for certain employees. The SERP is funded from the general assets of the Company.
 
The Company also provides certain healthcare and life insurance benefits for both active and retired employees. The Postretirement Health and Life Insurance Plan (“the Postretirement Plan”) is contributory,


F-21


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
requiring participants to pay a stated percentage of the premium for coverage. As of October 1, 2001, the Postretirement Plan was amended to freeze benefits for current retirees and certain other employees at the January 1, 2002 level. Also, as of October 1, 2001, the Postretirement Plan had a curtailment, which eliminated retiree life insurance for all active employees and healthcare benefits for almost all future retirees, effective January 1, 2002.
 
The components of the net periodic benefit cost for the Pension Plan and the Postretirement Plan are as follows:
 
                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
    Pension Benefits     Postretirement Plan  
    2007     2008     2007     2008  
 
Service cost
  $ 4,076     $ 3,876     $     $  
Interest cost
    10,476       10,844       834       850  
Amortization of transition obligation
                82       100  
Recognized net actuarial loss
                2        
Expected return on plan assets
    (13,730 )     (13,720 )            
Amortization of prior year service cost
    (400 )     (400 )            
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    286       250              
                                 
Net periodic expense
  $ 708     $ 850     $ 918     $ 950  
                                 
Employer contributions
  $ 88     $ 2,405     $ 2,255     $ 1,816  
                                 
 
Payments to the Pension Plan and the Postretirement Plan are consistent with the amounts disclosed as of December 31, 2007.
 
16.   Segment Reporting:
 
The Company has two operating segments, Risk Assessment and Decision Analytics. These designations have been made as the discrete operating results are reviewed by the Company’s chief decision maker to assess profitability. The Company does not allocate investment income, interest income, interest expense or income tax expense, since these items are not considered in evaluating the segment’s overall operating performance. The Company does not evaluate the financial performance of each segment based on assets.
 
Risk Assessment:   The Company is the leading provider of statistical, actuarial and underwriting data for the U.S. P&C insurance industry. The Company’s databases include cleansed and standardized records describing premiums and losses in insurance transactions, casualty and property risk attributes for commercial buildings and their occupants and fire suppression capabilities of municipalities. The Company uses this data to create policy language and proprietary risk classifications that are industry standards and to generate prospective loss cost estimates used to price insurance policies.
 
Decision Analytics:   The Company develops solutions that its customers use to analyze the four key processes in managing risk: ‘prediction of loss,’ ‘selection and pricing of risk,’ ‘detection and prevention of fraud’ and ‘quantification of loss.’ The Company’s combination of algorithms and analytic methods incorporates its proprietary data to generate solutions in each of these four categories.
 
In most cases, the Company’s customers integrate the solutions into their models, formulas or underwriting criteria in order to predict potential loss events, ranging from hurricanes and earthquakes to unanticipated healthcare claims. The Company develops catastrophe and extreme event models and offer solutions covering natural and man-made risks, including acts of terrorism. The Company also develops


F-22


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
solutions that allow customers to quantify costs after loss events occur. Fraud solutions include data on claim histories, analysis of mortgage applications to identify misinformation, analysis of claims to find emerging patterns of fraud and identification of suspicious claims in the insurance, mortgage and healthcare sectors.
 
The following table provides the Company’s revenue and operating income performance by reportable segment for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008:
 
                         
    June 30, 2007  
    Risk
    Decision
       
    Assessment     Analytics     Total  
 
Revenues
  $ 244,556     $ 155,432     $ 399,988  
Expenses:
                       
Cost of revenues
    104,917       71,585       176,502  
Selling, general, and administrative
    34,820       20,780       55,600  
                         
Segment EBITDA
    104,819       63,067       167,886  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    9,541       5,957       15,498  
Amortization of intangible assets
    572       16,668       17,240  
                         
Operating income
    94,706       40,442       135,148  
                         
Unallocated expenses:
                       
Investment income
                    4,392  
Realized gains on securities, net
                    592  
Interest expense
                    (11,474 )
Other expense
                    (21 )
                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes
                  $ 128,637  
                         
Capital expenditures
  $ 12,185     $ 10,865     $ 23,050  
                         
 


F-23


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
                         
    June 30, 2008  
    Risk
    Decision
       
    Assessment     Analytics     Total  
 
Revenues
  $ 253,356     $ 184,334     $ 437,690  
Expenses:
                       
Cost of revenues
    103,140       87,538       190,678  
Selling, general, and administrative
    36,716       22,312       59,028  
                         
Segment EBITDA
    113,500       74,484       187,984  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    9,278       7,146       16,424  
Amortization of intangible assets
    427       14,510       14,937  
                         
Operating income
    103,795       52,828       156,623  
                         
Unallocated expenses:
                       
Investment income
                    1,617  
Realized losses on securities, net
                    (1,286 )
Interest expense
                    (14,173 )
Other expense
                    (14 )
                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes
                  $ 142,767  
                         
Capital expenditures
  $ 6,481     $ 11,329     $ 17,810  
                         
 
Operating segment revenue by type of service is provided below:
 
                 
    June 30,
    June 30,
 
    2007     2008  
 
Risk Assessment:
               
Industry standard insurance programs
    157,045       165,719  
Property-specific rating and underwriting information
    63,786       63,344  
Statistical agency and data services
    13,643       13,820  
Actuarial services
    10,082       10,473  
                 
Total Risk Assessment
  $ 244,556     $ 253,356  
                 
Decision Analytics:
               
Fraud identification and detection solutions
  $ 88,532     $ 102,858  
Loss prediction solutions
    38,025       46,260  
Loss quantification solutions
    28,875       35,216  
                 
Total Decision Analytics
  $ 155,432     $ 184,334  
                 
 
17.   Research and Development Costs:
 
Research and development costs, which primarily relate to the personnel and related overhead costs incurred in developing new products and services, are expensed as incurred. Such costs were $4,096 and $4,535 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and were included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

F-24


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
18.   Related Parties:
 
The Company considers its Class A and Class B stockholders that own more than 5% of the outstanding stock within the respective class to be related parties as defined within FAS No. 57, Related Party Disclosures . At June 30, 2008, there were six Class B stockholders each owning more than 5% of the outstanding Class B common stock. Two of these six Class B stockholders have employees who serve on the Company’s board of directors.
 
The Company incurred expenses associated with the payment of insurance coverage premiums to certain of the largest stockholders aggregating $350 and $408 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. These expenses are included in “Cost of revenues” and “Selling, general and administrative” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
 
19.   Commitments and Contingencies:
 
The Company is a party to legal proceedings with respect to a variety of matters in the ordinary course of business. Including those matters described below, the Company is unable, at the present time, to determine the ultimate resolution of or provide a reasonable estimate of the range of possible loss attributable to these matters or the impact they may have on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. This is primarily because many of these cases remain in their early stages and only limited discovery has taken place. Although the Company believes it has strong defenses for the proceedings described below, the Company could in the future incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
 
Claims Outcome Advisor Litigation
 
Hensley, et al. v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al. is a putative nationwide class action complaint, filed in February 2005, in Miller County, Arkansas state court. Defendants include numerous insurance companies and providers of software products used by insurers in paying claims. The Company is among the named defendants. Plaintiffs allege that certain software products, including our Claims Outcome Advisor product and a competing software product sold by Computer Sciences Corporation, improperly estimated the amount to be paid by insurers to their policyholders in connection with claims for bodily injuries. On August 18, 2008, the Company was voluntarily dismissed from the case with prejudice.
 
The Company has entered into settlement agreements with plaintiffs asserting claims relating to the use of Claims Outcome Advisor by defendants Hanover Insurance Group, Progressive Car Insurance, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group. Each of these settlements has been granted final approval by the court and together they resolve the claims asserted in this case against us with respect to the above insurance companies, who settled the claims against them as well. A provision was recorded in 2006 for this proceeding and the total amount we paid in 2008 with respect to these settlements was less than $2 million. A fourth defendant, The Automobile Club of California, that is alleged to have used Claims Outcome Advisor has not settled. Plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss us from the case with prejudice once a discovery dispute relating to certain documents is resolved.
 
Xactware Litigation
 
The following two lawsuits have been filed by or on behalf of groups of Louisiana insurance policyholders who claim, among other things, that certain insurers who used products and price information supplied by our Xactware subsidiary (and those of another provider) did not fully compensate policyholders for property damage covered under their insurance policies. The plaintiffs seek to recover compensation for their damages in an amount equal to the difference between the amount paid by the defendants and the fair market repair/restoration costs of their damaged property.


F-25


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
Schafer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. , et al. is a putative class action pending against the Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company filed in March 2007 in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaint alleged antitrust violations, breach of contract, negligence, bad faith, and fraud. The court dismissed the antitrust claim as to both defendants and dismissed all claims against us other than fraud, which will proceed to the discovery phase along with the remaining claims against State Farm. Plaintiffs have moved to certify a class with respect to the fraud and breach of contract claims which the defendants will oppose.
 
Mornay v. Travelers Ins. Co. , et al. is a putative class action pending against the Company and Travelers Insurance Company filed in November 2007 in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaint alleged antitrust violations, breach of contract, negligence, bad faith, and fraud. As in Schafer, the court dismissed the antitrust claim as to both defendants and dismissed all claims against us other than fraud. The court has stayed the proceedings pending an appraisal of the lead plaintiffs’ insurance claims.
 
The third lawsuit, Louisiana ex rel. Foti v. Allstate Ins. Co. , is a putative parens patriae action filed by the Louisiana Attorney General in November 2007 in Louisiana state court against numerous insurance companies, the Company, and other solution providers, and consultants. The complaint contains allegations of an antitrust conspiracy among the defendants with respect to the payment of insurance claims for property damage and seeks the forfeiture of any illegal profits and treble damages. Defendants removed the case to the Eastern District of Louisiana. A motion to remand the case to state court was denied by the district court. That decision was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss and plaintiffs are opposing the motion.
 
At this time it is not possible to determine the ultimate resolution of, or estimate the liability related to, these matters. No provision for losses has been provided in connection with the Xactware litigation.
 
iiX Litigation
 
In March 2007, our Insurance Information Exchange, or iiX, subsidiary, as well as other information providers and insurers in the State of Texas, were served with a summons and class action complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging violations of the Driver Privacy Protection Act, or the DPPA. Plaintiffs brought the action on their own behalf and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals whose personal information is contained in any motor vehicle record maintained by the State of Texas and who have not provided express consent to the State of Texas for the distribution of their personal information for purposes not enumerated by the DPPA and whose personal information has been knowingly obtained and used by the defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants knowingly obtained such personal information and that the obtaining and use of this personal information was not for a purpose authorized by the DPPA. The complaint seeks liquidated damages in the amount of $2,500 for each instance of a violation of DPPA, punitive damages and the destruction of any illegally obtained personal information. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on failure to state a claim and lack of standing and a decision on that motion is pending.


F-26


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
 
 
20.   Subsequent Events:
 
The Company provided full recourse loans, callable at the Company’s discretion, to directors and senior management in connection with exercising their stock options. As of June 30, 2008, the “Notes receivable from stockholders” included within “Total assets” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet have been reclassified to current after the Company received Board approval for corporate governance changes necessary to allow the Company to proceed with a proposed IPO. As of August 7, 2008, this loan program has been terminated and the loans were called by the Company. All of the notes receivable classified as assets and classified as components of “Total redeemable common stock” have subsequently been repaid, with the exception of $722, which will be repaid by October 2008.
 
**************


F-27


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Jersey City, New Jersey
 
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2008. This financial statement is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We believe that our audit of the balance sheet provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, such balance sheet presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Verisk Analytics, Inc. at June 30, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
 
August 12, 2008


F-28


Table of Contents

 
VERISK ANALYTICS, INC.
 
BALANCE SHEET
June 30, 2008
 
         
ASSETS
Cash
  $ 1,000  
         
Total assets
  $ 1,000  
         
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Total liabilities
  $  
Commitments and contingencies
       
Stockholders’ equity:
       
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued
  $ 1  
Additional paid-in capital
    999  
         
Total stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,000  
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,000  
         
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.


F-29


Table of Contents

 
VERISK ANALYTICS, INC.
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT
 
1.   Organization:
 
On June 27, 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved certain corporate governance changes necessary to allow the Company to proceed with a proposed initial public offering (“IPO”). Immediately prior to the completion of the proposed IPO, the Company will undergo a corporate reorganization whereby the Class A and Class B common stock of the Company will be exchanged by the current stockholders for the common stock of Verisk Analytics, Inc. (“Verisk”) on a one-for-one basis. Verisk, formed on May 23, 2008, was established to serve as the parent holding company of Insurance Services Office, Inc.
 
All stock options granted under the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan will be transferred to Verisk, without modification to the terms of the options other than such options will be exercisable for Class A common stock of Verisk. Class A common stock of Verisk will not be redeemable by the holder and only Class A common stock will be offered to the public.
 
Upon consummation of the IPO, two new series of Class B common stock, Class B (Series 1) common stock (the “Class B-1”) and Class B (Series 2) common stock (the “Class B-2”) will be formed and 50 percent of each Class B stockholders’ existing Class B common stock will be converted into shares of new Class B-1 common stock and the remaining 50 percent of each Class B stockholders’ existing Class B common stock will be converted into shares of new Class B-2 common stock. Each share of Class B-1 common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the stockholder, into one share of Class A common stock 18 months after the date of the IPO. Each share of Class B-2 common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the stockholder, into one share of Class A common stock 30 months after the date of the IPO. In conjunction with the IPO, Verisk plans to effect a stock split of both classes of common stock. The strike price of stock options will be adjusted based on the effect of the stock split.
 
2.   Basis of Presentation:
 
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
3.   Commitments and Contingencies:
 
The Company does not have any commitments and contingencies.


F-30


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Insurance Services Office, Inc.
Jersey City, New Jersey
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Insurance Services Office, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 16. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 .
 
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) , effective December 31, 2006.
 
/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 
Parsippany, New Jersey
August 12, 2008


F-31


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2006 and 2007
 
                 
    2006     2007  
    (In thousands, except for share and per share data)  
ASSETS
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 99,152     $ 24,049  
Available-for-sale securities
    7,257       28,350  
Accounts receivable, net (including amounts from related parties of $1,364 and $949, respectively)
    91,725       86,488  
Notes receivable from stockholders’
    4,271       347  
Prepaid expenses
    8,929       7,609  
Deferred income taxes
    19,019       22,654  
Federal and state taxes receivable
    5,449       3,003  
Other current assets
    13,191       8,525  
                 
Total current assets
    248,993       181,025  
Noncurrent assets:
               
Fixed assets, net
    70,470       85,436  
Intangible assets, net
    139,718       141,160  
Goodwill
    224,680       339,891  
Notes receivable from stockholders’
    11,883       12,356  
Deferred income taxes
    37,294       55,679  
Other assets
    11,693       12,936  
                 
Total assets
  $ 744,731     $ 828,483  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  $ 66,710     $ 78,234  
Acquisition related liabilities
    13,414       100,300  
Short-term debt
    120,851       35,171  
Pension and postretirement benefits, current
    4,324       4,636  
Fees received in advance (including amounts from related parties of $8,677 and $5,817, respectively)
    124,136       127,907  
                 
Total current liabilities
    329,435       346,248  
Noncurrent liabilities:
               
Long-term debt
    327,847       403,159  
Pension benefits
    29,185       17,637  
Postretirement benefits
    26,525       23,894  
Other liabilities
    22,163       62,085  
                 
Total liabilities
    735,155       853,023  
Redeemable common stock
               
Class A redeemable common stock, stated at redemption value, $.01 par value; 6,700,000 shares authorized; 2,849,885 and 2,922,253 shares issued and 1,347,540 and 1,163,066 outstanding in 2006 and 2007, respectively
    1,183,049       1,217,942  
Unearned Class A common stock KSOP shares
    (4,913 )     (4,129 )
Notes receivable from stockholders’
    (52,203 )     (42,625 )
                 
Total redeemable common stock
    1,125,933       1,171,188  
Commitments and contingencies
               
Stockholders’ deficit:
               
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 10,004,500 shares issued and 2,945,900 and 2,873,412 outstanding in 2006 and 2007, respectively
    100       100  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (16,017 )     (8,699 )
Accumulated deficit
    (457,557 )     (508,136 )
Class B common stock, treasury stock, 7,058,600 and 7,131,088 shares in 2006 and 2007, respectively
    (642,883 )     (678,993 )
                 
Total stockholders’ deficit
    (1,116,357 )     (1,195,728 )
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
  $ 744,731     $ 828,483  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-32


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For The Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
    (In thousands, except for share
 
    and per share data)  
 
Revenues (includes revenues from related parties of $79,269, $83,919 and $84,891 for 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively)
  $ 645,660     $ 730,133     $ 802,195  
Expenses:
                       
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)
    294,911       331,804       357,191  
Selling, general and administrative
    88,723       100,124       107,576  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    22,024       28,007       31,745  
Amortization of intangible assets
    19,800       26,854       33,916  
                         
Total expenses
    425,458       486,789       530,428  
                         
Operating income
    220,202       243,344       271,767  
Other income/(expense):
                       
Investment income
    2,919       6,585       8,442  
Realized gains (losses) on securities, net
    27       (375 )     857  
Interest expense
    (10,465 )     (16,668 )     (22,928 )
Other income (expense)
    (14 )     (109 )     9  
                         
Total other expense, net
    (7,533 )     (10,567 )     (13,620 )
                         
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    212,669       232,777       258,147  
Provision for income taxes
    (85,722 )     (86,921 )     (103,184 )
                         
Income from continuing operations
    126,947       145,856       154,963  
                         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $721, $712 and $1,496 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively
    (2,574 )     (1,805 )     (4,589 )
                         
Net income
  $ 124,373     $ 144,051     $ 150,374  
                         
Basic income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B:
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 29.81     $ 35.31     $ 38.58  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (0.61 )     (0.44 )     (1.14 )
                         
Net income per share
  $ 29.20     $ 34.87     $ 37.44  
                         
Diluted income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B:
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 28.45     $ 33.85     $ 37.03  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (0.58 )     (0.42 )     (1.10 )
                         
Net income per share
  $ 27.87     $ 33.43     $ 35.93  
                         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
    4,258,989       4,130,962       4,016,928  
                         
Diluted
    4,462,109       4,308,976       4,185,151  
                         
Pro forma basic income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B (unaudited):
                       
Income from continuing operations
                       
Loss from discontinued operations
                       
                         
Pro forma net income per share
                       
                         
Pro forma diluted income/(loss) per share of Class A and Class B (unaudited):
                       
Income from continuing operations
                       
Loss from discontinued operations
                       
                         
Pro forma net income per share
                       
                         
Weighted average shares used in pro forma per share amounts (unaudited):
                       
Basic
                       
                         
Diluted
                       
                         
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-33


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
For The Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
 
                                                 
          Accumulated
                         
          Other
                      Total
 
    Accumulated
    Comprehensive
    Class B Common Stock     Treasury
    Stockholders’
 
    Deficit     Income (Loss)     Shares     Par Value     Stock     Deficit  
    (In thousands, except for share data)  
 
Balance, January 1, 2005
  $ (135,830 )   $ 191       10,004,500     $ 100     $ (602,390 )   $ (737,929 )
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
    124,373                               124,373  
Other comprehensive losses
          (2,925 )                       (2,925 )
                                                 
Comprehensive income
                                  121,448  
Treasury stock acquired — Class B common stock
                            (39,378 )     (39,378 )
Stock options exercised for 233,608 shares (including tax benefit of $27,852)
    (70,854 )                             (70,854 )
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
    (211,581 )                               (211,581 )
                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2005
  $ (293,892 )   $ (2,734 )     10,004,500     $ 100     $ (641,768 )   $ (938,294 )
                                                 
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
    144,051                               144,051  
Other comprehensive gains
          2,352                         2,352  
Comprehensive income
                                  146,403  
Incremental adjustment to adopt FAS No. 158, net of tax of $9,317
          (15,635 )                       (15,635 )
Treasury stock acquired — Class B common stock
                            (1,115 )     (1,115 )
Stock options exercised for 179,967 shares (including tax benefit of $31,964)
    (81,516 )                             (81,516 )
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
    (226,200 )                             (226,200 )
                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2006
  $ (457,557 )   $ (16,017 )     10,004,500     $ 100     $ (642,883 )   $ (1,116,357 )
                                                 
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
    150,374                               150,374  
Other comprehensive gains
          7,318                         7,318  
                                                 
Comprehensive income
                                  157,692  
                                               
Treasury stock acquired — Class B common stock
                            (36,110 )     (36,110 )
Stock options exercised for 72,083 shares (including tax benefit of $12,798)
    (36,655 )                             (36,655 )
Cumulative effect adjustment to adopt FIN No. 48
    (10,338 )                             (10,338 )
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
    (153,960 )                             (153,960 )
                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2007
  $ (508,136 )   $ (8,699 )     10,004,500     $ 100     $ (678,993 )   $ (1,195,728 )
                                                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-34


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For The Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
Net income
  $ 124,373     $ 144,051     $ 150,374  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    22,123       28,119       31,843  
Amortization of intangible assets
    19,800       26,854       33,916  
KSOP compensation expense
    13,793       18,779       22,247  
Stock-based compensation
    4,094       6,148       8,244  
Non-cash charges associated with other employee compensation plans
    601       1,909       2,182  
Goodwill impairment
    1,500             1,744  
Accrued interest on notes receivable from stockholders’
    (1,516 )     (2,190 )     (2,454 )
Realized (gains) losses on securities
    (27 )     375       (857 )
Deferred income taxes
    (7,776 )     (11,848 )     (5,698 )
Other operating
    185       216       298  
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
          2,374       1,791  
Excess tax benefits from exercised stock options
    (27,852 )     (31,964 )     (12,798 )
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions:
                       
Accounts receivable, net
    (12,263 )     (3,987 )     7,194  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (3,486 )     (1,751 )     2,213  
Federal and state taxes receivable
    25,938       19,262       13,062  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    9,656       (7,014 )     (8,294 )
Fees received in advance
    3,682       27,219       3,751  
Other liabilities
    1,246       6,947       (237 )
                         
Net cash provided by operating activities
    174,071       223,499       248,521  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-35


Table of Contents

INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $3,466, $532 and $120, respectively
    (59,249 )     (201,617 )     (50,658 )
Earnout payments
    (10,771 )           (3,191 )
Proceeds from release of contingent escrows
    2,024       297       3,039  
Escrow funding associated with acquisitions
    (14,354 )     (14,600 )     (4,375 )
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
    (496 )     (35,081 )     (44,101 )
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities
    402       34,893       22,872  
Purchases of fixed assets
    (24,019 )     (25,742 )     (32,941 )
Proceeds from receipt of notes receivable from stockholders’
    4             301  
Issuance of notes receivable from stockholders’
    (985 )     (1,602 )     (1,777 )
                         
Net cash used in investing activities
    (107,444 )     (243,452 )     (110,831 )
                         
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt
    15,000       15,000       30,000  
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
    220,000       175,000       85,000  
Redemption of Class A common stock
    (141,857 )     (126,857 )     (168,660 )
Repurchase of Class B common stock
    (39,378 )     (1,115 )     (36,110 )
Proceeds from issuance of Class A common stock
    100              
Repayment of short-term debt
    (172,884 )     (18,356 )     (136,008 )
Excess tax benefits from exercised stock options
    27,852       31,964       12,798  
Proceeds from exercised stock options
    213       271       389  
                         
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (90,954 )     75,907       (212,591 )
Effect of exchange rate changes
    (551 )     376       (202 )
                         
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (24,878 )     56,330       (75,103 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
    67,700       42,822       99,152  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
  $ 42,822     $ 99,152     $ 24,049  
                         
Supplemental disclosures:
                       
Taxes paid
  $ 66,841     $ 78,800     $ 94,258  
                         
Interest paid
  $ 9,814     $ 14,901     $ 22,752  
                         
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
                       
Loans made to directors and officers in connection with the exercise of stock options
  $ (12,573 )   $ (24,438 )   $ (15,130 )
                         
Stock redemptions used to repay notes receivable from stockholders’ maturities and to exercise stock options
  $ 32,720     $ 13,854     $ 35,429  
                         
KSOP stock redemption funded in the prior year
  $     $ 10,001     $ 2,643  
                         
Deferred tax (liability) asset established on date of acquisition
  $ (8,918 )   $ 7,542     $ 24  
                         
Capital lease obligations
  $ 8,712     $     $ 9,554  
                         
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  $     $     $ 4,688  
                         
Increase in goodwill due to acquisition related liabilities
  $ 1,000     $ 4,362     $ 98,343  
                         
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-36


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in thousands, except for share and per share data, unless otherwise stated)
 
1.   Organization:
 
Insurance Services Office, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) enable risk-bearing businesses to better understand and manage their risks. The Company provides its customers proprietary data that, combined with analytic methods, creates embedded decision support solutions. The Company is one of the largest aggregators and providers of data pertaining to U.S. property and casualty (“P&C”) insurance risks. The Company offers solutions for detecting fraud in the U.S. P&C insurance, mortgage and healthcare industries and sophisticated methods to predict and quantify loss in diverse contexts ranging from natural catastrophes to health insurance. The Company provides solutions, including data, statistical models or tailored analytics, all designed to allow clients to make more logical decisions.
 
The Company was formed in 1971 as an advisory and rating organization for the P&C insurance industry to provide statistical and actuarial services, to develop insurance programs and to assist insurance companies in meeting state regulatory requirements. Over the past decade, the Company has broadened its data assets, entered new markets, placed a greater emphasis on analytics, and pursued strategic acquisitions.
 
2.   Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
 
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates include acquisition purchase price allocations, the fair value of goodwill, the realization of deferred tax assets, acquisition related liabilities, fair value of stock based compensation, liabilities for pension and postretirement benefits, fair value of the Company’s common stock, and the estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates. Reclassifications from “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” to “Acquisition related liabilities”, and from “Noncurrent pension benefits” to “Pension and postretirement benefits, current” in an amount of $254 have been made in the 2006 consolidated balance sheet to conform to the 2007 presentation. Significant accounting policies include the following:
 
(a)  Intercompany Accounts and Transactions
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Insurance Services Office, Inc. and subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
 
(b)  Revenue Recognition
 
The following describes the Company’s primary types of revenues and the applicable revenue recognition policies. The Company’s revenues are primarily derived from sales of services and revenue is recognized as services are performed and information is delivered to our customers. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, fees and/or price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
 
Industry Standard Insurance Programs, Statistical Agent and Data Services, and Actuarial Services
 
Industry standard insurance programs, statistical agent and data services and actuarial services are sold to participating insurance company customers under annual agreements covering a calendar year where the price is determined at the inception of the agreement. In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 Revenue Recognition (“SAB No. 104”), the Company


F-37


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
recognizes revenue ratably over the term of these annual agreements, as services are performed and continuous access to information is provided over the entire term of the agreements.
 
Property-Specific Rating and Underwriting Information
 
The Company provides property specific rating information through reports issued for specific commercial properties, for which revenue is recognized when the report is delivered to the customer, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
 
In addition, the Company provides hosting or software solutions that provide continuous access to information about the properties being insured and underwriting information in the form of standard policy forms to be used by customers. As the customer has a contractual right to take possession of the software without significant penalty, revenues from these arrangements are recognized in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statement of Position (“SOP”) No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions (“SOP No. 97-2”). The Company recognizes software license revenue when the arrangement does not require significant production, customization, or modification of the software and the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred, fees are fixed or determinable, and collections are probable. These software arrangements include post-contract customer support (“PCS”). Currently, the Company recognizes software license revenue ratably over the duration of the annual license term as vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of PCS the only remaining undelivered element, cannot be established in accordance with SOP No. 97-2.
 
Fraud Identification and Detection Solutions
 
Fraud identification and detection solutions are comprised of transaction-based fees recognized as information is delivered to customers, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
 
Loss Prediction
 
Loss prediction solutions consist of term-based software licenses and revenues are recognized in accordance with SOP No. 97-2. These software arrangements include PCS, which includes unspecified upgrades on a when and if available basis. The Company recognizes software license revenue ratably over the duration of the annual license term as VSOE of PCS, the only remaining undelivered element, cannot be established in accordance with SOP No. 97-2.
 
The Company also provides software hosting arrangements to customers whereby the customer does not have the right to take possession of the software. Revenues from these contracts are recognized in accordance with EITF No. 00-03, Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements that Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware (“EITF No. 00-03”). As these arrangements include PCS throughout the hosting term, revenues from these multiple element arrangements are recognized in accordance with EITF No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (“EITF No. 00-21”). The Company recognizes revenue ratably over the duration of the license term, which range from one to five years, since the elements do not have stand alone value.
 
Loss Quantification Solutions
 
Loss quantification solutions consist of term-based software subscription licenses and revenues are recognized in accordance with SOP No. 97-2. These software arrangements include PCS,


F-38


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
which includes unspecified upgrades on a when and if available basis. Customers are billed for access on a monthly basis and the Company recognizes revenue accordingly.
 
With respect to an insignificant percentage of revenues, the Company uses contract accounting, as required by SOP No. 97-2, when the arrangement with the customer includes significant customization, modification, or production of software. For these elements, revenue is recognized in accordance with SOP No. 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, using the percentage-of-completion method, which requires the use of estimates. In such instances, management is required to estimate the input measures, based on hours incurred to date compared to total estimated hours of the project, with consideration also given to output measures, such as contract milestones, when applicable. Adjustments to estimates are made in the period in which the facts requiring such revisions become known and, accordingly, recognized revenues and profits are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. The Company considers the contract substantially complete when there is compliance with all performance specifications and there are no remaining costs or potential risk.
 
(c)  Fees Received in Advance
 
The Company invoices its customers in annual, quarterly, monthly, or milestone installments. Amounts billed and collected in advance of contract terms are recorded as a fees received in advance on the balance sheet and are recognized as the services are performed and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are met.
 
(d)  Fixed Assets
 
Property and equipment, internal-use software and finite-lived intangibles are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization which are computed on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term.
 
The Company’s internal software development costs primarily relate to internal-use software. Such costs are capitalized in the application development stage in accordance with AICPA SOP No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use . Software development costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over a three year period which management believes represents the useful life of these capitalized costs.
 
In accordance with FAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets , whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets may not be recoverable, the Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment by first comparing the carrying value of the assets to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. If the carrying value exceeds the sum of the assets’ undiscounted cash flows, the Company estimates an impairment loss by taking the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the assets.
 
(e)  Capital and Operating Leases
 
The Company leases various property, plant and equipment. Leased property is accounted for under FAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases (“FAS No. 13”). Accordingly, leased property that meets certain criteria is capitalized and the present value of the related lease payments is recorded as a liability. Amortization of assets under capital leases is computed utilizing the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life (principally 3 to 4 years for computer equipment and automobiles).


F-39


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
All other leases are accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense for operating leases, which may have rent escalation provisions or rent holidays, are recorded on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable bases lease period in accordance with FAS No. 13. The initial lease term generally includes the build-out period, where no rent payments are typically due under the terms of the lease. The difference between rent expense and rent paid is recorded as deferred rent. Construction allowances received from landlords are recorded as a deferred rent credit and amortized to rent expense over the term of the lease.
 
(f)  Investments
 
The Company’s investments at December 31, 2006 and 2007 included registered investment companies, private equity securities, and U.S. common stock. All investments with readily determinable market values are classified as available-for-sale as defined in FAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. While these investments are not held with the specific intention to sell them, they may be sold to support the Company’s investment strategies. All available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value. The cost of all investments sold is based on the specific identification method. Dividend income is accrued on the ex-dividend date.
 
The Company performs periodic reviews of its investment portfolio when individual holdings have experienced a decline in fair value below their respective cost. The Company considers a number of factors in the evaluation of whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary including: (a) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer; (b) the Company’s ability and intent to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value; and (c) the period and degree to which the market value has been below cost. Where the decline is deemed to be other-than-temporary, a charge is recorded to realized investment losses and a new cost basis is established for the investment.
 
In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) released Staff Position (“FSP”) Nos. FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The FSP addresses the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. It also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The Company adopted these new pronouncements for its other-than-temporary impairment analysis as of January 1, 2006. The adoption of these did not have a significant impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
 
The Company’s investments in private equity securities are included in “Other Assets.” Those securities are carried at cost, as the Company owns less than 20% and does not otherwise have the ability to exercise significant influence. These securities are written down to their estimated realizable value, when management considers there is an other-than-temporary decline in value, based on financial information received and the business prospects of the entity.
 
(g)  Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and acquisition related liabilities are approximately equal to their carrying amounts because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of stockholders’ note receivables was estimated at $65,002 and $55,553 and is based on the Applicable Federal Rates as published by the Internal Revenue Service as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The fair value of the long-term debt was estimated at $329,725 and $407,784 and is based on an estimate of


F-40


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
interest rates available to the Company for debt with similar features as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
 
(h)  Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
Accounts receivable is generally recorded at the invoiced amount. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on an analysis of the aging of the accounts receivable, historical write-offs, customer payment patterns, individual customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, and/or establishment of specific reserves for customers in adverse financial condition. The Company reassesses the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts on a periodic basis.
 
(i)  Foreign Currency
 
The Company has determined local currencies are the functional currencies of the foreign operations. The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated at the year-end rate of exchange and statement of income items are translated at the average rates prevailing during the year. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ deficit.
 
(j)  Stock Based Compensation
 
The Company follows FAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“FAS No. 123(R)”). FAS No. 123(R) is a revision of FAS No. 123, as amended, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB No. 25”). Under FAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the options granted, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. On January 1, 2005, the Company adopted FAS No. 123(R) using a prospective approach, as required under FAS No. 123(R). Under this application, the Company is required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption.
 
FAS No. 123(R) requires that stock-based compensation expense be recognized over the period from the date of grant to the date when the award is no longer contingent on the employee providing additional service (the “substantive vesting period”). The Company’s 1996 Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (the “Option Plan”) provides an accelerated vesting for awards provided to employees who retire at the minimum age of 62 and completes at least five years of prior service. For these awards the Company follows the substantive vesting period approach.
 
The fair value of the stock options granted is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The expected term (estimated period of time outstanding) was estimated using the simplified method as defined in SAB No. 107, in which the expected term equals the average of graded vesting term and the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected term of the equity award. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock option’s expected term, ending on the day of grant, and calculated on a quarterly basis as determined for purposes of the KSOP. The Company estimates the expected volatility based on the fair value of its Class A common shares as determined quarterly. These values are utilized by the Company to provide liquidity to stockholders under the provisions of the Company’s defined contribution plan and Option Plan. The expected dividend yield has not been included in the fair value calculation as the Company has not and does not expect to pay dividends. The Company estimates expected forfeitures of equity awards at the date of grant and recognizes compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Changes in the forfeiture assumptions may impact the


F-41


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the requisite service period, and may impact the timing of expense recognized over the requisite service period.
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Option pricing model
    Black-Scholes       Black-Scholes       Black-Scholes  
Expected volatility
    13.77 %     13.53 %     13.40 %
Risk-free interest rate
    4.08 %     4.59 %     4.54 %
Expected term in years
    6.13       6.18       6.19  
Dividend yield
                 
 
The per option weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $103.94, $167.49 and $210.69, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense in 2005 caused income before income taxes to decrease by $4,094 and net income to decrease by $2,432. Stock-based compensation expense in 2006 caused income before income taxes to decrease by $6,148 and net income to decrease by $3,846. Stock-based compensation expense in 2007 caused income before income taxes to decrease by $8,244 and net income to decrease by $4,988.
 
(k)  Research and development costs
 
Research and development costs, which primarily relate to the personnel and related overhead costs incurred in developing new services for our customers, are expensed as incurred. Such costs were $5,191, $7,007 and $8,944 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and were included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
 
(l)  Income Taxes
 
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method under FAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“FAS No. 109”), which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
 
Deferred tax assets are recorded to the extent these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce deferred tax assets if it is determined to be more likely than not that all or some of the potential deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN No. 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with FAS No. 109. FIN No. 48 provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized based on the technical merits when it is more-likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes. Income tax positions must meet a more likely than not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN No. 48 and in subsequent periods. This interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.


F-42


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 , on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, the Company recognized approximately a $10,338 increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase to the January 1, 2007, balance of accumulated deficit. The balance sheet line items impacted by this increase are as follows:
 
         
Increase in non-current deferred income taxes
  $ 13,933  
Increase in federal and state taxes receivable
  $ 7,620  
Increase in other liabilities
  $ 31,891  
Increase in accumulated deficit
  $ 10,338  
 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within “Other liabilities” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
Prior to adopting FIN No. 48, the Company’s policy was to maintain tax contingency liabilities for potential audit issues. The tax contingency liabilities were based on an estimate of the probable amount of additional taxes that may be due in the future. Any additional taxes due would be determined only upon completion of current and future federal state and international tax audits. At December 31, 2006, the Company had $7,620 of tax contingency liabilities included in “Foreign and state taxes receivable.”
 
(l)  Earnings Per Share
 
Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) are determined in accordance with FAS No. 128, Earnings per Share , which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share. Basic EPS excludes all dilutive common stock equivalents. It is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS, as calculated using the treasury stock method, reflects the potential dilution that would occur if the Company’s dilutive outstanding stock options were exercised. For purposes of calculating earnings per share, Class A and Class B common shares are combined since both classes have identical rights to earnings.
 
(m)  Pension and Postretirement Benefits
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (“FAS No. 158”). FAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the balance sheet; the recognition in other comprehensive income of gains or losses and prior service costs or credits arising during the period, but which are not included as components of periodic benefit cost and the measurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the balance sheet date. The Company adopted FAS No. 158 as of December 31, 2006. See “Note 17 — Pension and Postretirement Benefits” for additional disclosures required by FAS No. 158 and the effects of adoption.
 
(n) Product Warranty Obligations
 
The Company provides warranty coverage for certain of its products. The Company recognizes a product warranty obligation when claims are probable and can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, product warranty obligations were not significant.
 
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into numerous agreements that contain standard indemnities whereby the Company indemnifies another party for breaches of confidentiality, infringement of intellectual property or gross negligence. Such indemnifications are primarily granted under licensing of computer software. Most agreements contain provisions to limit


F-43


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under these indemnifications, however the Company is not able to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made under these indemnifications as the triggering events are not subject to predictability.
 
(o) Loss contingencies
 
The Company accrues for costs relating to litigation, claims and other contingent matters when such liabilities become probable and reasonably estimable. Such estimates are based on management’s judgment. Actual amounts paid may differ from amounts estimated, and such differences will be charged to operations in the period in which the final determination of the liability is made.
 
(p) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities using fair value, such as emphasizing that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value hierarchy with the highest priority being quoted prices in active markets. FAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007; however, the FASB provided a one-year deferral for implementation of this standard for non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of FAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on how we measure fair value, but will require additional disclosures.
 
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP FAS 157-2”), which delays the effective date of FAS No. 157 for non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Non-financial assets and liabilities include, among others: intangible assets acquired through business combinations; long-lived assets when assessing potential impairment; and liabilities associated with restructuring activities. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of FSP FAS 157-2 for non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities will have, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets & Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FAS No. 115 (“FAS No. 159”). FAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses are reported in earnings for items measured using the fair value option. FAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. FAS No. 159 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008 and it did not elect the fair value option for any of its qualifying financial instruments.
 
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards , (“EITF No. 06-11”), that an entity should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on affected securities charged to retained earnings as an increase in Additional Paid in Capital (“APIC”). The amount recognized in APIC should be included in the APIC pool. When an entity’s estimate of forfeitures increases or actual forfeitures exceed its estimates, the amount of tax benefits previously recognized in APIC should be reclassified into the statement of operations. The amount reclassified is limited to the APIC pool balance on the reclassification date. EITF No. 06-11 applies prospectively to the income tax benefits of dividends declared on affected securities. The adoption of EITF No. 06-11, effective January 1, 2008, did not have an impact on the financial statements as the Company does not currently pay dividends on its common stock.


F-44


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“FAS No. 141(R)”). FAS No. 141(R) replaces FAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“FAS No. 141”). FAS No. 141(R) primarily requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, measured at their fair values as of that date. This replaces FAS No. 141’s cost-allocation process, which required the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Generally, FAS No. 141(R) will become effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The impact of adopting FAS No. 141(R) will be dependent on the business combinations that the Company may pursue and complete after its effective date.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51, (“FAS No. 160”). FAS No. 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be identified in the consolidated financial statements. It also calls for consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. FAS No. 160 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 except the presentation and disclosure requirements which are required to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Earlier adoption of FAS No. 160 is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of FAS No. 160 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — An Amendment of FAS No. 133 (“FAS No. 161”). FAS No. 161 seeks to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures regarding their impact on financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. To achieve this increased transparency, FAS No. 161 requires the disclosure of the fair value of derivative instruments and gains and losses in a tabular format; the disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk-related; and cross-referencing within the footnotes. FAS No. 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of FAS No. 161 will have, if any, on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP No. 142-3”). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“FAS No. 142”) . The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141(R), and other U.S. GAAP.  FSP No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is evaluating the potential impact, if any, the adoption of FSP No. 142-3 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
3.   Concentration of Credit Risk:
 
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, available for sale securities and accounts receivable, which are generally not collateralized. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with higher credit quality financial institutions in order to limit the amount of credit exposure. The total cash balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance


F-45


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Corporation (“FDIC”) to a maximum amount of $100 per bank. At December 31, 2007, the Company had cash balances on deposit with five banks that exceeded the balance insured by the FDIC limit by approximately $11,567. At December 31, 2007, the Company also had cash on deposit with foreign banks of approximately $8,385.
 
The Company considers the concentration of credit risk associated with its trade accounts receivable to be commercially reasonable and believes that such concentration does not result in the significant risk of near-term severe adverse impacts. The Company’s top fifty customers for the year ended December 31, 2007, represent approximately 44% of revenue, with no individual customer accounting for more than 4% of revenue. No individual customer comprised more than 10% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2006 and 2007.
 
4.   Cash and Cash Equivalents:
 
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks, money market funds, commercial paper and other liquid instruments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase.
 
5.   Accounts Receivables:
 
Accounts receivables consist of the following at December 31:
 
                 
    2006     2007  
 
Billed receivables
  $ 90,366     $ 88,370  
Unbilled receivables
    6,632       6,365  
                 
Total receivables
    96,998       94,735  
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
    (5,273 )     (8,247 )
                 
Accounts receivable, net
  $ 91,725     $ 86,488  
                 
 
6.   Notes Receivable from Stockholders:
 
Notes receivable from stockholders consists of recourse loans issued by the Company to directors and senior management in connection with exercising stock options. These loans for the exercise price are classified as a component of “Redeemable common stock” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These loans may also include loans for the tax liability and accrued interest incurred in connection with exercising stock options are included in “Notes receivable from stockholders”’ as a component of total assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, approximately $68,357 and $55,328, respectively, of notes receivable from stockholders were outstanding. At December 31, 2006 and 2007, $9,913 and $2,776, respectively, of notes receivable from stockholders were due within one year. These notes were issued at rates approximating market rates of interest. Payments of principal and interest related to these notes are generally deferred until the end of the loan terms, which range from three to nine years. Interest income on notes receivable from shareholders was $1,516, $2,190 and $2,454 during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.


F-46


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   Investments:
 
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities at December 31:
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
          Unrealized
    Unrealized
       
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
2006
                               
U.S. common stock
  $ 15     $     $     $ 15  
Registered investment companies
    6,736       506             7,242  
                                 
Total available-for-sale securities
  $ 6,751     $ 506     $     $ 7,257  
                                 
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
          Unrealized
    Unrealized
       
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
2007
                               
Registered investment companies
  $ 29,036     $     $ (686 )   $ 28,350  
                                 
 
Noncurrent other assets include private equity securities for which no readily determinable market value exists. At December 31, 2006, and 2007, the carrying value which approximated the estimated fair value of such securities was approximately $200 and $0, respectively.
 
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments were $402, $34,893 and $22,872 for 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Realized gains, including write downs related to other-than-temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities and noncurrent other assets were as follows:
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Gross realized gains on U.S. common stock
  $     $     $ 135  
Gross realized gains on registered investment companies
    27       114       922  
Impairment of U.S. common stock
          (205 )      
Impairment of private equity securities
          (284 )     (200 )
                         
Realized gains (losses) on securities, net
  $ 27     $ (375 )   $ 857  
                         
 
Investment income in 2005 includes interest income from cash and cash equivalents, interest income from notes receivable from stockholders, and dividend income from investments of $1,306, $1,516, and $96, respectively. Investment income in 2006 includes interest income from cash and cash equivalents, interest income from notes receivable from stockholders, and dividend income from investments of $3,315, $2,190, and $424, respectively. Investment income in 2007 includes interest income from cash and cash equivalents, interest income from notes receivable from stockholders, and dividend income from investments of $4,096, $2,456, and $435, respectively.
 
From time to time, the Company has entered into certain derivative transactions involving the sale of covered call options on underlying investments held by the Company. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, these call options either expired or were exercised. The gain on the call premiums of $656 and $1,455 was recognized as investment income in 2006 and 2007, respectively.


F-47


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
8.   Fixed Assets:
 
The following is a summary of fixed assets at December 31:
 
                                 
                Accumulated
       
                Depreciation and
       
    Useful Life     Cost     Amortization     Net  
 
2006
                               
Furniture and office equipment
    3-10 years     $ 77,372     $ (56,252 )   $ 21,120  
Leasehold improvements
    Lease term       23,573       (6,271 )     17,302  
Purchased software
    3 years       25,663       (20,759 )     4,904  
Software development costs
    3 years       58,047       (38,048 )     19,999  
Leased equipment
    3-4 years       21,093       (13,948 )     7,145  
                                 
Total fixed assets
          $ 205,748     $ (135,278 )   $ 70,470  
                                 
2007
                               
Furniture and office equipment
    3-10 years     $ 102,745     $ (67,687 )   $ 35,058  
Leasehold improvements
    Lease term       24,049       (7,876 )     16,173  
Purchased software
    3 years       30,918       (25,431 )     5,487  
Software development costs
    3 years       69,758       (45,632 )     24,126  
Leased equipment
    3-4 years       17,080       (12,488 )     4,592  
                                 
Total fixed assets
          $ 244,550     $ (159,114 )   $ 85,436  
                                 
 
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense on fixed assets for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, was approximately $22,024, $28,007 and $31,745, of which $5,281, $6,403 and $7,584 related to capitalized software development costs, respectively. Leased equipment includes amounts held under capital leases for automobiles, computer software, and computer equipment.
 
9.   Goodwill and Intangible Assets:
 
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of tangible net assets and identifiable intangible assets of the businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives and are not amortized. Intangible assets determined to have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are subject to impairment testing annually as of June 30, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. This testing compares carrying values to fair values and, when fair value is lower than carrying value, the carrying value of these assets is reduced to fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1,500, $0, and $1,744, respectively, included in “Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the consolidated statements of operations.


F-48


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following is a summary of the change in goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, both in total and as allocated to the Company’s operating segments:
 
                         
    Risk
    Decision
       
    Assessment     Analytics     Total  
 
Goodwill at December 31, 2005
  $ 23,303     $ 126,295     $ 149,598  
Current year acquisitions
          69,328       69,328  
Earnout related payments
    4,362       8,934       13,296  
Reclassifications to deferred income taxes
          (7,542 )     (7,542 )
                         
Goodwill at December 31, 2006
    27,665       197,015       224,680  
Current year acquisitions
          14,157       14,157  
Earnout related payments
    243       102,555       102,798  
Impairment charge
          (1,744 )     (1,744 )
                         
Goodwill at December 31, 2007
  $ 27,908     $ 311,983     $ 339,891  
                         
 
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company’s intangible assets and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following:
 
                                 
    Weighted
                   
    Average
          Accumulated
       
    Useful Life     Cost     Amortization     Net  
 
2006
                               
Technology-based
    6 years     $ 157,946     $ (55,869 )   $ 102,077  
Marketing-related
    4 years       16,990       (10,678 )     6,312  
Contract-based
    6 years       6,555       (4,641 )     1,914  
Customer-related
    9 years       37,775       (8,360 )     29,415  
                                 
Total intangible assets
          $ 219,266     $ (79,548 )   $ 139,718  
                                 
 
                                 
    Weighted
                   
    Average
          Accumulated
       
    Useful Life     Cost     Amortization     Net  
 
2007
                               
Technology-based
    5 years     $ 164,317     $ (80,419 )   $ 83,898  
Marketing-related
    4 years       25,846       (13,667 )     12,179  
Contract-based
    6 years       6,555       (5,596 )     959  
Customer-related
    13 years       57,906       (13,782 )     44,124  
                                 
Total intangible assets
          $ 254,624     $ (113,464 )   $ 141,160  
                                 


F-49


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Consolidated amortization expense related to intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, was approximately $19,800, $26,854 and $33,916, respectively. Estimated amortization expense through 2012 and thereafter for intangible assets subject to amortization is as follows:
 
         
Year
  Amount  
 
2008
  $ 30,025  
2009
  $ 27,920  
2010
  $ 22,721  
2011
  $ 16,455  
2012
  $ 14,319  
Thereafter
  $ 29,720  
 
10.   Acquisitions and Discontinued Operations:
 
2007 Acquisitions
 
In 2007, the Company acquired five entities for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $50,538 and funded indemnity and contingent payment escrows totaling $3,344 and $1,031, respectively. At December 31, 2007, the current and long-term portions of these escrows amounted to $3,513 and $900 and have been included in “Other current assets” and “Other assets”, respectively. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method. Accordingly, the purchase price, excluding contingency escrows, was allocated to assets acquired based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition dates. Each entity’s operating results have been included in the Company’s consolidated results from the respective dates of acquisition. A description of the five entities purchased in 2007 is as follows:
 
On January 11, 2007, the Company acquired the remaining 20% of the stock of National Equipment Register (“NER”), resulting in 100% ownership, in order to more closely align operations with existing businesses. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financials results for 2007 and 2008. NER is a provider of solutions to increase the recovery rate of stolen equipment and reduce the costs associated with theft for owners and insurers.
 
On March 23, 2007, the Company acquired the rights, title, and interest of the name, trade name, and service mark, “Rex Depot” and other intangible assets of Smith Sekelsky Web Products, LLC. The assets associated with this acquisition further enhance the capability of the Company’s appraisal software offerings.
 
On October 3, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of HealthCare Insight, LLC (“HCI”), a Salt Lake City, UT based company whose solutions enable healthcare claims payors to prevent fraud, abuse, and overpayment. The acquisition of HCI further supports the Company’s objective as the leading provider of data, analytics, and decision-support solutions for healthcare claims payors. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for 2008. HCI combines automated modeling and profiling of claims with the enhanced accuracy available through clinical validation.
 
On October 12, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of NIA Consulting, LTD (“NIA”), a Mason, TX based company, which is a leading provider of fraud detection and forensic audit services for the home mortgage and mortgage insurance industries. Adding NIA and its proprietary database to the Company’s fraud protection solution strengthens the Company’s search capacity and positions the Company to incorporate more real-world fraud schemes into the Company’s automated solutions. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for 2008.


F-50


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
On December 19, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of Predicted Solutions, a leading provider of computer software applications and algorithms for commercial and governmental health plans and Medicaid to help health plan administrators detect and recover losses due to fraud, waste and abuse. The acquisition integrates with the Company’s analytic methodology to provide customers with the information needed to ensure their program integrity through better pharmacy and payment analysis.
 
The allocation of purchase price for the 2007 acquisitions resulted in finite lived intangible assets of $35,358 with no residual value, goodwill of $14,157, and fair value of tangible assets acquired of $581. The goodwill associated with the 2007 acquisitions is included within the Decision Analytics segment. The Company did not assume significant liabilities related to these acquisitions. The goodwill for all acquisitions is expected to be deductible for tax purposes over 15 years. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has not finalized the working capital adjustments related to the HCI and NIA acquisitions due to the timeframe established within the agreements relative to timing of year-end reporting.
 
The amounts assigned to intangible assets by type for the 2007 acquisitions are summarized in the table below:
 
                 
    Weighted Average
       
    Useful Life     Total  
 
Technology-based
    4 years     $ 6,371  
Marketing-related
    4 years       8,856  
Customer-related
    19 years       20,131  
                 
Total intangible assets
          $ 35,358  
                 
 
2006 Acquisitions
 
In 2006, the Company acquired four entities for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $202,149, of which $187,956 relates to Xactware, and funded indemnity and contingent payment escrows totaling $11,100 and $3,500, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the current and long-term portions of these escrows amounted to $4,100 and $10,500 and have been included in “Other current assets” and “Other assets”, respectively. At December 31, 2007, the current and long-term portions of these escrows amounted to $543 and $10,700 and have been included in “Other current assets” and “Other assets”, respectively. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method. Accordingly, the purchase price, excluding contingency escrows, was allocated to assets acquired based on their estimated fair values as of the dates of acquisition. Each entity’s operating results have been included in the Company’s consolidated results from the respective dates of acquisition. A description of the four entities purchased in 2006 follows:
 
On March 28, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of RegsData, Inc. (“RegsData”), a Milford, CT based provider of automated mortgage-licensing compliance services allowing the ability to manage and monitor third-party relationships and provide a comprehensive solution for the mortgage industry. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for the trailing 15-month period ending June 30, 2007.
 
On August 8, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of Xactware, Inc. (“Xactware”), an Orem, UT based provider of repair estimation and data analysis to assist property insurance carriers and their business partners in adjusting property claims, thus delivering more comprehensive products and services to the Company’s property insurance claims customers. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for 2007 and 2008.


F-51


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
On August 23, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of Domus Systems, Inc. (“Domus”), an Agoura Hills, CA based provider of automated compliance and reporting services to the affordable-housing industry. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for 2007.
 
On October 11, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of Urix LLC (“Urix”), a Cheshire, CT based provider of cutting-edge healthcare and employer reporting solutions. Urix is a leading developer of web-based healthcare analytic solutions that are both scalable and cost-effective on a national level. The purchase includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for 2007.
 
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition for the acquisitions that occurred in 2006. The goodwill associated with the 2006 acquisitions is included in the Decision Analytics segment.
 
                         
    Xactware     All other     Total  
 
Current assets
  $ 7,061     $ 926     $ 7,987  
Property and equipment
    2,320       107       2,427  
Other assets
    11             11  
Intangible assets
    121,603       7,234       128,837  
Goodwill
    63,309       6,019       69,328  
                         
Total assets acquired
    194,304       14,286       208,590  
Current liabilities
    6,348       93       6,441  
                         
Total liabilities assumed
    6,348       93       6,441  
                         
Net assets acquired
  $ 187,956     $ 14,193     $ 202,149  
                         
 
Supplemental information on an unaudited pro forma basis is presented below as if the acquisition of Xactware occurred at the beginning of the years 2005 and 2006. The pro forma information presented below is based on estimates and assumptions, which the Company believes are reasonable and is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated financial position or results of operations in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized had this acquisition been completed at the beginning of 2005 and 2006. The unaudited pro forma information includes intangible asset amortization charges and incremental borrowing costs as result of the acquisition, net of related tax impacts, estimated using the Company’s effective tax rate for continuing operations for each period.
 
                 
    2005     2006  
    (unaudited)  
 
Pro forma revenues
  $ 686,851     $ 761,192  
Pro forma net income
  $ 122,901     $ 148,009  
Pro forma basic income per share of Class A and Class B
  $ 28.86     $ 35.83  
Pro forma diluted income per share of Class A and Class B
  $ 27.54     $ 34.35  


F-52


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The amounts assigned to intangible assets by type for the 2006 acquisitions are summarized in the table below:
 
                                 
    Weighted Average
                   
    Useful Life     Xactware     All other     Total  
 
Technology-based
    6 years     $ 94,604     $ 5,221     $ 99,825  
Marketing-related
    3 years       4,640       1,074       5,714  
Customer-related
    12 years       22,359       939       23,298  
                                 
Total intangible assets
          $ 121,603     $ 7,234     $ 128,837  
                                 
 
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had estimated the allocation of purchase price to goodwill and deferred taxes for the RegsData, Xactware, Domus Systems and Urix acquisitions. In 2007, the Company finalized the RegsData, Xactware, Domus Systems and Urix purchase allocations. The goodwill for all acquisitions is expected to be deductible for tax purposes over 15 years. The acquired intangible assets have useful lives ranging from 2 to 14 years with no residual value.
 
2005 Acquisitions
 
In 2005, the Company acquired three entities within the Decision Analytics segment for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $62,715 and funded contingency escrows totaling $14,354. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method. Accordingly, the purchase price, excluding contingency escrows, was allocated to assets acquired based on their estimated fair values as of the dates of acquisition. Each entity’s operating results have been included in the Company’s consolidated results from the respective dates of acquisition. A description of the three entities purchased in 2005 follows:
 
In 2005, the Company made two acquisitions in order to expand its decision analytics services into the mortgage industry. On January 14, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger to purchase 100% of the stock of Appintelligence, Inc. (“Appintelligence”), a Weldon Spring, MO based provider of data integrity, fraud prevention and risk assessment and mitigation tools, designed to maximize loss mitigation and recovery efforts for lenders in the mortgage industry.
 
On March 31, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger to purchase 100% of the stock of Sysdome, Inc. (“Sysdome”), a Calabasas, CA based provider of fraud-detection and decision-support tools, enabling mortgage professionals to detect identity and property fraud quickly and accurately.
 
On August 10, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the net assets of eLiens, a College Station, TX based provider of fast, easy, and economical lien holder and mortgagee notification services to insurance carriers. This acquisition utilized the Company’s expertise of data management for the insurance industry.
 
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had estimated the allocation of purchase price for deferred taxes and goodwill for the Appintelligence, Sysdome and eLiens acquisitions. In 2006, the Company finalized the Appintelligence, Sysdome and eLiens purchase allocations, resulting in a reallocation of $7,542 from goodwill to deferred taxes. Goodwill and intangible assets recognized in these transactions amounted to approximately $39,663 and $29,343, respectively. The goodwill for Appintelligence and Sysdome is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes, while goodwill for eLiens of $2,816 is expected to be deductible over 15 years. The acquired intangible assets have useful lives ranging from 1 to 7 years with no residual value.


F-53


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Acquisition Contingent Payments
 
The annual aggregate maximum contingent payment, subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results, for the year ending December 31, 2008 would be $240,931, of which $191,800 relates to Xactware. A condition of the additional payments for certain of the acquisitions, is the continued employment of key employees resulting in the treatment of such additional payments as compensation expense. Compensation expense related to earn out payments for fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $9,734, $9,027 and $3,605, respectively. Based on the actual results of operations and agreements which required the continuing employment of key employees the Company was required to make payments of $13,414 and $2,200, in 2006 and 2007, respectively. For Xactware, contingent payments were not related to continuing employment of key employees, and as such the amount due of $98,100 was treated as additional purchase price. These amounts, which are included in “Acquisition related liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet were paid the year after they were accrued.
 
Acquisition Contingent Escrows
 
Pursuant to the related acquisition agreements, the Company has funded various escrow accounts to satisfy pre-acquisition indemnity and tax claims arising subsequent to the acquisition date, as well as a portion of the contingent payments. The future additional payments that may be required pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreements are not reflected as liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as the final payments are contingent on future events. At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the current portion of the escrow amounted to $11,465 and $5,767 respectively, and has been included in “Other current assets.” The indemnification portion of these escrows were $600 and $4,083 at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the noncurrent portion of the escrow, all of which are indemnification escrows, amounted to $10,510 and $11,596, of which $10,000 relates to Xactware, and has been included in “Other assets” at December 31, 2006 and 2007.
 
Discontinued Operations
 
As of December 31, 2007, the Company discontinued operations of its claims consulting business located in New Hope, PA and the United Kingdom. The results for this business were accounted for as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2007. Within the 2007 pre-tax loss are $2,786 of expenses directly related to the exit activity, which primarily consist of goodwill impairment of $1,744, other current asset write-off of $445, fixed asset disposals of $265, and employee separation costs of $119. The summarized, combined statements of operations from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are as follows:
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Revenues
  $ 4,249     $ 4,456     $ 2,352  
                         
Pre-tax loss
  $ (3,295 )   $ (2,517 )   $ (6,085 )
Tax benefit
    721       712       1,496  
                         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
  $ (2,574 )   $ (1,805 )   $ (4,589 )
                         
 
Depreciation expenses related to the discontinued operations for years ending 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $99, $112 and $98, respectively.


F-54


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
11.   Income Taxes:
 
The tax effects of significant items comprising the Company’s deferred tax assets, as of December 31 is as follows:
 
                 
    2006     2007  
 
Employee wages, pensions and other benefits
  $ 12,633     $ 18,118  
Postretirement benefits
    11,923       11,231  
Fixed assets
    (4,700 )     (3,281 )
Deferred revenue adjustment
    4,632       7,391  
Deferred rent adjustment
    3,289       3,598  
Net operating loss carryover
    5,768       6,383  
Pension and postretirement unfunded liability adjustment
    9,947       5,621  
Adjustment for unrealized (gains) losses
    (189 )     274  
State tax adjustments
          15,686  
Goodwill amortization
    13,159       8,586  
Other
    1,995       6,260  
Valuation allowance
    (2,144 )     (1,534 )
                 
Net deferred tax assets
  $ 56,313     $ 78,333  
                 
 
As a result of certain realization requirements of FAS No. 123(R), the table of deferred tax assets and liabilities shown above does not include certain deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 that arose directly from tax deductions related to equity compensation in excess of compensation recognized for financial reporting. Equity will be increased by $13,436 if and when such deferred tax assets are ultimately realized. The Company uses tax law ordering for purposes of determining when excess tax benefits have been realized.
 
As of December 31, 2007, a deferred tax asset in the amount of $24 was recorded in connection with the acquisition of HCI. As of December 31, 2006, deferred tax assets in the amount of $823 and $6,719 were recorded in connection with the acquisition of AppIntelligence and Sysdome, respectively. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the future. The Company has provided for a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with the capital loss carryforwards expiring in 2012 and the net operating losses of certain foreign subsidiaries. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows:
 
         
2008–2015
  $ 78.8 million  
2016–2020
    0.6 million  
2021–2027
    31.4 million  
         
    $ 110.8 million  
         
 
A valuation allowance has been established based on management’s evaluation of the likelihood of utilizing the capital loss carryforwards before they expire. Management has determined that the generation of future foreign taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets is uncertain. Other than these items, management has determined, based on the Company’s historical operating performance, that taxable income of the Company will more likely than not be sufficient to fully realize the deferred tax assets.


F-55


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The income tax provision for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Current:
                       
Federal and foreign
  $ 82,723     $ 86,297     $ 96,277  
State and local
    10,718       12,663       17,843  
                         
    $ 93,441     $ 98,960     $ 114,120  
                         
Deferred:
                       
Federal and foreign
  $ (5,944 )   $ (9,800 )   $ (7,041 )
State and local
    (1,775 )     (2,239 )     (3,895 )
                         
    $ (7,719 )   $ (12,039 )   $ (10,936 )
                         
Provision for income taxes
  $ 85,722     $ 86,921     $ 103,184  
                         
 
The Company’s income tax benefit for discontinued operations for fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $721, $712 and $1,496, respectively.
 
The reconciliation between the Company’s effective tax rate on income from continuing operations and the statutory tax rate is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 
                         
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Federal statutory rate
    35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit
    2.7 %     2.9 %     3.2 %
Non-deductible KSOP expenses
    2.1 %     2.7 %     2.9 %
State tax adjustments
    (0.1 )%     (3.1 )%     (0.3 )%
Other
    0.6 %     (0.2 )%     (0.8 )%
                         
Effective tax rate for continuing operations
    40.3 %     37.3 %     40.0 %
                         
 
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN No. 48, which prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. For each tax position, the Company must determine whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is then measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize within the financial statements. No benefits may be recognized for tax positions that do not meet the more likely than not threshold. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefit is as follows:
 
         
Unrecognized tax benefit at January 1, 2007
  $ 27,052  
Gross increase in tax positions in prior period
     
Gross decrease in tax positions in prior period
     
Gross increase in tax positions in current period
    7,662  
Settlements
     
Lapse of statute of limitations
    (2,684 )
         
Unrecognized tax benefit, December 31, 2007
  $ 32,030  
         
 
Included in the total unrecognized tax benefits of $32,030 was $24,368 that, if recognized, would have a favorable effect on the Company’s effective tax rate. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits would


F-56


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
not affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and penalties associated with income taxes as a component of income tax expense. At January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, approximately $4,879 and $7,033, respectively, was accrued in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet for the payment of interest and penalties associated with income taxes. The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits largely include state exposures from allocation of income between jurisdictions, not filing a state tax return, the methods of filing state tax returns, and the utilization of tax credits. The Company does not expect an increase in unrecognized benefits related to state tax exposures within the coming year. In addition, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that approximately $3,394 of its currently remaining unrecognized tax positions, each of which is individually insignificant, may be recognized by the end of 2008 as a result of a lapse of the statute of limitations.
 
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. (for both Federal and multiple states) and in certain foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax years are subject to examination by the U.S. and foreign tax authorities. With some exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state or foreign examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2004.
 
12.   Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions:
 
The following table presents the components of “Other current assets,” “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities” at December 31:
 
                 
    2006     2007  
 
Other current assets:
               
Acquisition contingent escrows
  $ 11,465     $ 5,767  
Other current assets
    1,726       2,758  
                 
Total other current assets
  $ 13,191     $ 8,525  
                 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
               
Accrued salaries, benefits and other related costs
  $ 43,175     $ 48,417  
Other current liabilities
    23,535       29,817  
                 
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  $ 66,710     $ 78,234  
                 
Other liabilities:
               
Unrecognized tax benefits
  $     $ 39,023  
Deferred rent
    10,044       11,028  
Other liabilities
    12,119       12,034  
                 
Total other liabilities
  $ 22,163     $ 62,085  
                 


F-57


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
13.   Debt:
 
The following table presents short-term and long-term debt by issuance:
 
                                 
                As of December 31,  
    Issuance Date     Maturity Date     2006     2007  
 
Short-term debt:
                               
Prudential senior notes:
                               
4.11% Series B senior notes
    6/10/2004       6/10/2007     $ 60,000     $  
4.12% Series C senior notes
    6/28/2004       6/28/2007       40,000        
Bank of America
    10/25/2006       4/25/2007       15,000        
Bank of America
    10/25/2007       4/25/2008             15,000  
JPMorgan Chase
    12/31/2007       1/3/2008             15,000  
Capital lease obligations
    Various       Various       5,463       4,408  
Other
    Various       Various       388       763  
                                 
Short-term debt
                  $ 120,851     $ 35,171  
                                 
Long-term debt:
                               
Prudential senior notes:
                               
4.46% Series D senior notes
    6/14/2005       6/13/2009     $ 100,000     $ 100,000  
4.60% Series E senior notes
    6/14/2005       6/13/2011       50,000       50,000  
6.00% Series F senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2011       25,000       25,000  
6.13% Series G senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2013       75,000       75,000  
5.84% Series H senior notes
    10/26/2007       10/26/2013             17,500  
5.84% Series H senior notes
    10/26/2007       10/26/2015             17,500  
Principal senior notes:
                               
6.03% Series A senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2011       50,000       50,000  
6.16% Series B senior notes
    8/8/2006       8/8/2013       25,000       25,000  
New York Life senior notes:
                               
5.87% Series A senior notes
    3/16/2007       10/26/2013             17,500  
5.87% Series A senior notes
    3/16/2007       10/26/2015             17,500  
Other obligations:
                               
Capital lease obligations
    Various       Various       1,814       7,299  
Other
    Various       Various       1,033       860  
                                 
Long-term debt
                  $ 327,847     $ 403,159  
                                 
 
Accrued interest associated with the Company’s outstanding debt obligations was $2,239 and $2,548 as of December 2006 and 2007, respectively. Consolidated interest expense associated with the Company’s outstanding debt obligations was $10,238, $16,184, and $22,590 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively.
 
Prudential Master Shelf Agreement
 
On June 13, 2003, the Company authorized the issuance of senior promissory notes (“Prudential Shelf Notes”) under an uncommitted master shelf agreement with Prudential Capital Group (“Prudential”) in the aggregate principal amount of $200,000. On February 1, 2005, the Company amended the shelf agreement to increase the authorization of additional senior promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount by


F-58


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
$150,000. On February 1, 2007, the Company amended the shelf agreement to increase the authorization of additional senior promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount by $100,000. Prudential Shelf Notes may be issued and sold until the earliest of (i) February 28, 2010 (ii) the thirtieth day after receiving written notice to terminate; or (iii) the last closing day after which there is no remaining facility available. Interest is payable at a fixed rate or variable floating rate. Fixed rate Prudential Shelf Notes are subject to final maturities not to exceed ten years and, in the case of floating rate Prudential Shelf Notes, not to exceed five years. The Prudential Shelf Note agreement is uncommitted with a one time facility fee of $50. The net proceeds from the notes were utilized to repurchase Class B Company stock, to repay certain maturing notes and revolving credit facilities, and to fund acquisitions. Interest on the notes is payable quarterly.
 
Principal Master Shelf Agreement
 
On July 10, 2006, the Company authorized the issuance of senior promissory notes (“Principal Shelf Notes”) under an uncommitted master shelf agreement with Principal Global Investors, LLC (“Principal”) in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000. Principal Shelf Notes may be issued and sold until the earliest of (i) July 10, 2009 (ii) the thirtieth day after receiving written notice to terminate; or (iii) the last closing day after which there is no remaining facility available. Interest is payable at a fixed rate or variable floating rate. Fixed rate Principal Shelf Notes are subject to final maturities not to exceed ten years and, in the case of floating rate Principal Shelf Notes, not to exceed five years. The Principal Shelf Note is uncommitted with a one time facility fee of $25, no fees for the first issuance, and fees in the amount equal to 0.125% of the aggregate principal amount for subsequent issuances. The net proceeds from the notes issued were utilized to fund acquisitions. Interest on the notes is payable quarterly.
 
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, $75,000 was outstanding under this agreement. The Principal Shelf Notes contain covenants that, among other things, require the Company to maintain certain leverage and fixed charge ratios.
 
New York Life Master Shelf Agreement
 
On March 16, 2007, the Company authorized the issuance of senior promissory notes (“New York Life Shelf Notes”) under an uncommitted master shelf agreement with New York Life in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000. New York Life Shelf Notes may be issued and sold until the earliest of (i) March 16, 2010 (ii) the thirtieth day after receiving written notice to terminate; or (iii) the last closing day after which there is no remaining facility available. Interest is payable at a fixed rate or variable floating rate. Fixed rate New York Life Shelf Notes are subject to final maturities not to exceed ten years and, in the case of floating rate Shelf Notes, not to exceed five years. The New York Life Shelf Note is uncommitted with no fees for the first issuance, and fees in the amount equal to 0.125% of the aggregate principal amount for subsequent issuances. The net proceeds from the notes issued were utilized to fund acquisitions. Interest on the notes is payable quarterly.
 
As of December 31, 2007, $35,000 was outstanding under this agreement. The New York Life Shelf Notes contain covenants that, among other things, require the Company to maintain certain leverage and fixed charge ratios.


F-59


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Debt Maturities
 
The following table reflects the Company’s debt maturities:
 
         
Year
  Amount  
 
2008
  $ 35,171  
2009
    104,272  
2010
    3,548  
2011
    125,305  
2012
    34  
2013 and thereafter
    170,000  
 
Revolving Credit Facilities
 
The following table presents the revolving credit facilities outstanding at December 31:
 
                                             
                Maximum
                 
    Effective
    Expiration
    Available
          Interest
  Borrowings
 
Description
  Date     Date     Committed     Uncommitted     Rate   Outstanding  
 
2006:
                                           
JPMorgan Chase
    9/30/2006       9/30/2007     $ 25,000     $ 50,000     LIBOR + .65%   $  
Bank of America
    9/30/2006       9/30/2007       10,000       40,000     LIBOR + .75%     15,000  
Citibank
    10/1/2006       10/31/2007       20,000       30,000     PRIME −1.0%      
Morgan Stanley
    8/29/2006       8/28/2007             50,000     Determined at the
time of borrowing
     
                                             
Total
                  $ 55,000     $ 170,000         $ 15,000  
                                             
2007:
                                           
JPMorgan Chase
    10/1/2007       9/30/2008     $ 25,000     $ 50,000     LIBOR + .65%   $ 15,000  
Bank of America
    9/30/2007       9/30/2008       10,000       50,000     LIBOR + .65%     15,000  
Citibank
    10/31/2007       10/29/2008       20,000       30,000     LIBOR + .65%      
Morgan Stanley
    8/29/2007       8/28/2008             50,000     Determined at the
time of borrowing
     
                                             
                    $ 55,000     $ 180,000         $ 30,000  
                                             
 
In 2006, the Company amended its uncommitted master shelf agreements and revolving credit facilities to have four of its 100% owned subsidiaries, including ISO Claims Services, Inc., ISO Investment Holdings, Inc., AIR Worldwide Corporation, and ISO Services, Inc., fully and unconditionally, and jointly and severally guarantee all of its obligations under the credit facilities. In connection with this amendment, a sharing agreement was created between the Company and a syndicate of lenders in consideration of the exercise of set-off rights in connection with the guaranties. On September 30, 2007, the Company renegotiated the Bank of America credit facility to increase the availability to $60,000 and extend the maturity through September 2008.
 
The Bank of America committed line has an annual facility fee of $25 and interest on outstanding borrowings is payable monthly, at a rate of 5.59% at December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, $15,000 of borrowings was outstanding under this credit facility.
 
In October 2005, the Company renegotiated the revolving credit facility with JPMorganChase to increase the availability to $75,000. Interest on outstanding borrowings is payable monthly, at a rate of 4.90% at December 31, 2007. The committed line has an annual facility fee of 0.10% of the unused portion and


F-60


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
interest on outstanding borrowings is payable monthly. On September 30, 2007, the Company renegotiated the facility to extend the maturity through September 30, 2008. As of December 31, 2007, $15,000 of borrowings was outstanding under this credit facility.
 
On January 23, 2006, the Company entered into a $50,000 revolving credit agreement with Citibank, of which $20,000 is committed. Interest is payable monthly at the Prime rate minus 1%. The Company has the option on the commitment termination date to convert the revolver to a one year term loan at a cost of a 10 basis point fee on the converted amount. On October 31, 2007, the agreement was amended to change the interest rate and extend the maturity until October 29, 2008.
 
In August 2006, the Company entered into a $50,000 revolving credit facility with Morgan Stanley Bank. Interest is payable monthly at a rate to be determined at the time of borrowing. On August 29, 2007, the Company renegotiated the facility to extend the maturity through August 28, 2008.
 
14.   Redeemable Common Stock:
 
On November 18, 1996, the Company authorized 6,700,000 Class A shares. The Class A shares are reserved for the use in incentive plans for key employees and directors under the Option Plan, and for issuance to the KSOP. The Class A shares have voting rights to elect nine of the thirteen members of the board of directors. The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation limits those who may own Class A shares to current and former employees or directors, the KSOP and trusts by or for the benefit of immediate family members of employees and former employees.
 
Under the terms of the Option Plan, Class A shares resulting from exercised options that are held by the employee for more than six months and one day may be put to the Company and redeemed at the then current fair value at the date of the redemption request of the Class A shares. For options granted in 2002 through 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the cash settlement of the redemption up to one year. For options granted after 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the cash settlement of the redemption for up to two years. Under the terms of the KSOP, eligible participants may elect to diversify 100% of their 401(k) and up to 35% of their ESOP contributions that were made in the form of Class A stock. In addition, upon retirement or termination participants in the KSOP are required to liquidate their ownership in Class A common shares. Since the Class A shares distributed under the Option Plan and KSOP is subject to the restrictions above, the participant has the right to require the Company to repurchase shares based on the then current fair value of the Class A shares.
 
The fair value of the Company’s Class A redeemable common stock is established for purposes of the KSOP on the final day of the quarter and such price is utilized for all share transactions in the subsequent quarter. The current valuation in effect for the KSOP is also considered fair value for Class A redeemable common stock and related transactions within the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan.
 
The valuation methodology is based on a variety of qualitative and quantitative factors including the nature of the business and history of the enterprise, the economic outlook in general and the condition of the specific industries in which the Company operates, the financial condition of the business, the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow, and goodwill or other intangible asset value. The determination of the fair market value employs both a comparable public company analysis, which examines the valuation multiples of companies deemed comparable, in whole or in part, to the Company and a discounted cash flow analysis that determines a present value of the projected future cash flows of the business. The Company regularly assesses the underlying assumptions used in the valuation methodologies. As a result, the Company has utilized this quarterly fair value for all its Class A redeemable common stock transactions, as required by terms of the KSOP and the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan.
 
The Company follows SEC Accounting Series Release (“ASR”) No. 268, Presentation in Financial Statements of Preferred Redeemable Stock (“ASR No. 268”). ASR No. 268 requires the Company to record


F-61


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Class A shares and vested stock options at full redemption value at each balance sheet date as the redemption of these securities is not solely within the control of the Company. Redemption value for the Class A shares is determined quarterly for purposes of the KSOP. At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the fair value was $755 and $862 per Class A share, respectively. The redemption value of the Class A shares at December 31, 2006 and 2007 totaled $1,183,049 and $1,217,942, respectively, which includes $165,656 and $215,380, respectively, of aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding unexercised vested stock options.
 
During 2005, 2006, and 2007, 405,743, 253,000, and 256,842 Class A shares were redeemed by the Company at an average price per share of $430.26, $595.70, $803.73, respectively. Included in Class A shares redeemed were $86,271, $45,042 and $16,096 for shares utilized to satisfy minimum tax withholdings on options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 respectively.
 
Subsequent changes to the redemption value of the securities is charged first to retained earnings; once retained earnings is depleted, then to additional paid-in-capital, if additional paid-in-capital is also depleted, then to accumulated deficit. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the increases in redemption value of redeemable common stock totaled $178,881, $239,195 and $34,893, respectively. Additional information regarding the changes in redeemable common stock for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are provided in the table below.
 
                                                 
                            Notes
    Total
 
    Class A Redeemable Common Stock     Receivable
    Redeemable
 
          Redemption
    Unearned
    Additional
    from
    Common
 
    Shares     Value     KSOP     Pain-in-Capital     Stockholders’     Stock  
 
Balance, January 1, 2005
    2,435,584     $ 764,973     $ (6,561 )   $     $ (35,880 )   $ 722,532  
Redemption of Class A common stock
          (88,305 )                   11,411       (76,894 )
KSOP shares earned
                838       12,955             13,793  
Stock based compensation
                            4,094               4,094  
Stock options exercised
    233,608       10,484             27,852       (12,573 )     25,763  
Other stock issuances
    494       220                           220  
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
          256,482             (44,901 )           211,581  
                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2005
    2,669,686     $ 943,854     $ (5,723 )   $     $ (37,042 )   $ 901,089  
                                                 
Redemption of Class A common stock
          (105,670 )                   9,277       (96,393 )
KSOP shares earned
                810       17,969             18,779  
Stock based compensation
                            6,148               6,148  
Stock options exercised
    179,967       62,435             31,964       (24,438 )     69,961  
Other stock issuances
    232       149                           149  
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
          282,281           $ (56,081 )           226,200  
                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2006
    2,849,885     $ 1,183,049     $ (4,913 )   $     $ (52,203 )   $ 1,125,933  
                                                 


F-62


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                                                 
                            Notes
    Total
 
    Class A Redeemable Common Stock     Receivable
    Redeemable
 
          Redemption
    Unearned
    Additional
    from
    Common
 
    Shares     Value     KSOP     Pain-in-Capital     Stockholders’     Stock  
 
Redemption of Class A common stock
          (190,336 )                   24,708       (165,628 )
KSOP shares earned
                784       21,463             22,247  
Stock based compensation
                            8,244               8,244  
Stock options exercised
    72,083       28,526             12,798       (15,130 )     26,194  
Other stock issuances
    285       238                           238  
Increase in redemption value of Class A common stock
          196,465             (42,505 )           153,960  
                                                 
Balance, December 31, 2007
    2,922,253     $ 1,217,942     $ (4,129 )   $     $ (42,625 )   $ 1,171,188  
                                                 
 
15.   Stockholders’ Deficit:
 
On November 18, 1996, the Company authorized 20,000,000 Class B shares. The Class B shares have the same rights as Class A shares with respect to dividends and economic ownership, but have voting rights to elect three of the thirteen directors. The thirteenth seat on the board of directors is held by the chief executive officer of the Company. The Company repurchased 161,837, 2,895, and 72,488 Class B shares in 2005, 2006, and 2007 at an average price of $243.32, $385.20, and $498.15 per share, respectively.
 
Earnings Per Share
 
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, less the weighted average ESOP shares of common stock that have not been committed to be released. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to the computation of basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding using the treasury stock method, if the dilutive potential common shares, such as stock awards and stock options, had been issued.
 
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) computations for the years ended
 
                         
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Numerator used in basic and diluted EPS:
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 126,947     $ 145,856     $ 154,963  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
    (2,574 )     (1,805 )     (4,589 )
                         
Net income
  $ 124,373     $ 144,051     $ 150,374  
                         

F-63


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                         
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Denominator:
                       
Weighted average number of common shares used in basic EPS
    4,258,989       4,130,962       4,016,928  
Effect of dilutive shares:
                       
Potential Class A redeemable common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options
    203,120       178,014       168,223  
                         
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares used in diluted EPS
    4,462,109       4,308,976       4,185,151  
                         
Basic EPS:
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 29.81     $ 35.31     $ 38.58  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
    (0.61 )     (0.44 )     (1.14 )
                         
Basic EPS
  $ 29.20     $ 34.87     $ 37.44  
                         
Diluted EPS:
                       
Income from continuing operation
  $ 28.45     $ 33.85     $ 37.03  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit
    (0.58 )     (0.42 )     (1.10 )
                         
Diluted EPS
  $ 27.87     $ 33.43     $ 35.93  
                         
 
The potential shares of common stock that were excluded from diluted earnings per share were 119,857, 66,570 and 60,661 for 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, because the effect of including these potential shares was antidilutive.
 
Unaudited pro forma net income (loss) per share is presented for additional information only. As disclosed in “Note 21 — Subsequent Events,” Verisk Analytics, Inc. (“Verisk”) will become the new holding company of Insurance Services Office, Inc. In connection with the initial public offering, the stock of Insurance Services Office, Inc. will convert to stock of Verisk and Verisk plans to affect a stock split of its common stock. Pro forma net income (loss) per share is computed as if this stock split occurred at the beginning of 2007.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
The following is a summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31:
 
                 
    2006     2007  
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments
  $ 318     $ (412 )
Unrealized foreign currency gains
    357       154  
Pension and postretirement unfunded liability adjustment
    (16,692 )     (8,441 )
                 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  $ (16,017 )   $ (8,699 )
                 

F-64


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The before tax and after tax amounts for these categories, and the related tax benefit (expense) included in other comprehensive loss are summarized below:
 
                         
          Tax Benefit
       
2005
  Before Tax     (Expense)     After Tax  
 
Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the year
  $ 176     $ (70 )   $ 106  
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income
    (27 )     9       (18 )
Unrealized foreign currency losses
    (549 )           (549 )
Minimum pension liability adjustment
    (4,126 )     1,662       (2,464 )
                         
Total other comprehensive loss
  $ (4,526 )   $ 1,601     $ (2,925 )
                         
2006
                       
Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the year
  $ 467     $ (176 )   $ 291  
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income
    91       (34 )     57  
Unrealized foreign currency gain
    376             376  
Minimum pension liability adjustment
    2,814       (1,186 )     1,628  
                         
Total other comprehensive gain
  $ 3,748     $ (1,396 )   $ 2,352  
                         
2007
                       
Unrealized holding losses on investments arising during the year
  $ (2,250 )   $ 885     $ (1,365 )
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income
    1,057       (422 )     635  
Unrealized foreign currency losses
    (203 )           (203 )
Pension and postretirement unfunded liability adjustment
    12,577       (4,326 )     8,251  
                         
Total other comprehensive gain
  $ 11,181     $ (3,863 )   $ 7,318  
                         
 
16.   Compensation Plans:
 
KSOP
 
The Company has established the KSOP for the benefit of eligible employees in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. The KSOP includes both an employee savings component and an employee stock ownership component. The purpose of the combined plan is to enable the Company’s employees to participate in a tax-deferred savings arrangement under Code Sections 401(a) and 401(k), and to provide employee equity participation in the Company through the ESOP accounts.
 
Under the KSOP, eligible employees may make pre-tax and after-tax cash contributions as a percentage of their compensation, subject to certain limitations under the applicable provisions of the Code. The maximum pre-tax contribution that can be made to the 401(k) account as determined under the provisions of Code Section 401(g) is $14, $15 and $16 for 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Certain eligible participants (age 50 and older) may contribute an additional $4, $5 and $5 on a pre-tax basis for 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. After-tax contributions are limited to 10% of a participant’s compensation. The Company provides quarterly matching contributions in ISO Class A common stock. The quarterly matching contributions are equal to 75% of the first 6% of the participant’s contribution.
 
The Company established the ESOP component as a funding vehicle for the KSOP. This leveraged ESOP acquired 1,143,800 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a cost of approximately $33,170 ($29 per share) in January 1997. The ESOP borrowed $33,170 from an unrelated third party to finance the purchase of the ESOP Shares. The common shares were pledged as collateral for its debt. The Company makes annual cash contributions to the KSOP equal to the ESOP’s debt service. As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral and are allocated to active employees in proportion to their annual salaries in


F-65


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
relation to total participant salaries. The Company accounts for its ESOP in accordance with AICPA SOP No. 93-6, Accounting Practices for Certain Employee Stock Ownership Plans (“SOP No. 93-6”) . Accordingly, the shares pledged as collateral are reported as unearned ESOP shares in a contra-temporary equity account in the balance sheets. As shares are committed to be released from collateral, the Company reports compensation expense at the current fair value of the shares, and the shares become outstanding for EPS computations.
 
In 2004, the Company renegotiated the ESOP loan to require interest only payments for the third and fourth quarters of 2004. In December 2004, the Company repaid the ESOP loan and issued a new loan agreement between the Company and the KSOP, thereby extending the allocation of the remaining unreleased shares as of July 1, 2004 through 2013.
 
In 2005, the Company established the ISO Profit Sharing Plan (the “Profit Sharing Plan”), a defined contribution plan, to replace the pension plan for all eligible employees hired on or after March 1, 2005. The Profit Sharing Plan is a component of the KSOP. Eligible employees will participate in the Profit Sharing Plan if they complete 1,000 hours of service each plan year and are employed on December 31 of that year. The Company will make an annual contribution to the Profit Sharing Plan based on the Company’s performance. Participants vest once they have completed four years and 1,000 hours of service. In 2007, the profit sharing contribution was funded using Class A common stock. In 2005 and 2006, compensation expense related to the Profit Sharing Plan amounted to $99 and $393, respectively, and was contributed to the KSOP in the form of cash.
 
The KSOP shares as of December 31, were as follows:
 
                 
    2006     2007  
 
Shares released for ESOP allocation
    848,730       865,166  
Shares released for 401(k) matching
    125,670       135,382  
Shares released for the Profit Sharing Plan
          860  
Unreleased shares
    169,400       142,392  
                 
Total KSOP shares
    1,143,800       1,143,800  
                 
Fair value of unreleased shares
  $ 127,897     $ 122,742  
                 
 
The fair value of the Class A shares is determined quarterly as determined for purposes of the KSOP. Upon retirement or termination under the terms of the KSOP, an eligible participant may require the Company to repurchase vested shares based on the then current fair value of the Class A shares. At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the appraised fair value was $755 and $862 per share, respectively. KSOP compensation expense for 2005, 2006 and 2007 was approximately $13,793, $18,779 and $22,247, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the Company pre-funded anticipated KSOP share redemptions and recorded a prepaid asset in the consolidated balance sheets of $2,643.
 
Stock Option Plan
 
The Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan (the “Option Plan”) provides for the granting of options to key employees and directors of the Company. Options granted have varying exercise dates within four years after grant date and expire after ten years. Shares obtained through the exercise of stock options that are held by the employee for more than six months and one day may be put to the Company and redeemed at the then current fair value of the Class A shares. For options granted in 2002 through 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the redemption for one year. For options granted after 2004, the Company has the ability to defer the redemption for up to two years. In 2005, stock options granted had an exercise price in excess of the fair value of the stock on the grant date. In 2006 and 2007, stock options granted had an


F-66


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
exercise price equal to the fair value of the stock on the grant date. There were 1,992,795 shares of Class A common stock approved for issuance under the plan, of which up to 62,800, 60,000 and 75,000 options to purchase shares were authorized for future grants at December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $213, $271 and $389, respectively.
 
A summary of options outstanding under the Option Plan as of December 31, 2007, and changes during the three years then ended is presented below:
 
                         
          Weighted
    Aggregate
 
    Number
    Average
    Intrinsic
 
    of Options     Exercise Price     Value  
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2005
    765,800     $ 135.40     $ 215,649  
                         
Granted
    129,303     $ 431.03          
Exercised
    (233,608 )   $ 110.96     $ 70,854  
                         
Cancelled or expired
    (14,467 )   $ 247.07          
                         
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
    647,028     $ 200.89     $ 235,589  
                         
Granted
    69,441     $ 586.53          
Exercised
    (179,967 )   $ 144.16     $ 81,516  
                         
Cancelled or expired
    (12,734 )   $ 360.11          
                         
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
    523,768     $ 267.64     $ 255,264  
                         
Granted
    55,979     $ 760.35          
Exercised
    (72,083 )   $ 257.46     $ 36,655  
                         
Cancelled or expired
    (10,911 )   $ 458.18          
                         
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    496,753     $ 320.46     $ 269,012  
                         
Options exercisable at December 31, 2007
    329,503     $ 208.35     $ 215,380  
                         
Options exercisable at December 31, 2006
    287,617     $ 179.04     $ 165,656  
                         


F-67


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested options as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and changes during the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, is presented below:
 
                 
          Weighted
 
          Average
 
    Number
    Grant-Date
 
    of Options     Fair Value  
 
Nonvested balance at January 1, 2005
    449,486     $ 42.71  
Granted
    129,303     $ 103.94  
Vested
    (248,810 )   $ 51.18  
Cancelled or expired
    (14,467 )   $ 53.39  
                 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2005
    315,512     $ 60.63  
                 
Granted
    69,441     $ 167.49  
Vested
    (136,068 )   $ 54.86  
Cancelled or expired
    (12,734 )   $ 89.34  
                 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2006
    236,151     $ 93.83  
                 
Granted
    55,979     $ 210.69  
Vested
    (113,969 )   $ 76.89  
Cancelled or expired
    (10,911 )   $ 117.45  
                 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2007
    167,250     $ 142.94  
                 
 
As of December 31, 2007, there was $18,336 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Option Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.44 years. As of December 31, 2007, there are 167,250 nonvested stock options of which 157,485 are expected to vest. The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $12,734, $7,465 and $8,763, respectively.
 
Exercise prices for options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007 ranged from $71 to $836 as outlined in the following table:
 
                                                 
    Options Outstanding     Options Exercisable  
    Weighted-
                Weighted-
             
    Average
    Stock
    Weighted-
    Average
    Stock
    Weighted-
 
Range of
  Remaining
    Options
    Average
    Remaining
    Options
    Average
 
Exercise Prices
  Contractual Life     Outstanding     Exercise Price     Contractual Life     Exercisable     Exercise Price  
 
$ 71 to $110
    2.9       97,260     $ 104.45       2.9       97,260     $ 104.45  
$111 to $144
    5.2       53,460     $ 142.01       5.2       53,460     $ 142.01  
$145 to $231
    5.5       135,117     $ 186.53       5.3       109,967     $ 176.36  
$232 to $445
    7.3       101,504     $ 418.50       7.3       53,369     $ 408.19  
$446 to $681
    8.2       54,337     $ 586.88       8.3       13,776     $ 607.84  
$682 to $836
    9.1       55,075     $ 760.11       9.4       1,671     $ 807.89  
                                                 
              496,753                       329,503          
                                                 


F-68


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, the Company granted the following stock options with exercise prices and Black-Scholes values as follows:
 
                                 
    Number of
    Fair Value
          Black-Scholes
 
    Stock Options
    of Common
    Exercise
    Value of
 
Grant Dates
  Granted     Stock (1)     Price     Options  
 
March 1, 2007
    52,280     $ 755.00     $ 755.00     $ 208.43  
June 30, 2007
    300     $ 836.00     $ 836.00     $ 244.81  
July 1, 2007
    1,315     $ 836.00     $ 836.00     $ 245.91  
July 1, 2007
    2,084     $ 836.00     $ 836.00     $ 240.26  
 
(1) The fair value for these shares is the current valuation in effect for the KSOP. This fair value is also utilized for all Class A share transactions for the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan.
 
Performance Based Appreciation Awards
 
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Applied Insurance Research Inc., Intellicorp, Ltd, AscendantOne, Inc, DxCG, Appintelligence and Sysdome, the Company issued performance based appreciation awards to key employees of these companies. These awards represent the right to receive cash equal to an amount by which each company’s award unit value exceeds the award unit value on the date of grant. Performance is measured on income from continuing operations before investment expense and interest income, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Each company’s award unit value is based on a multiple of EBITDA. Units granted prior to December 31, 2004 vest at 25% per year and expire after ten years. Units granted after December 31, 2004 vest at 25% per year and expire after four years. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, compensation expense related to these units amounted to $721, $1,360 and $2,296, respectively. There were no redemptions in 2005, two redemptions in 2006 totaling $59 and four redemptions in 2007 totaling $342. The liability for these performance based awards of $2,183 and $4,137 at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
 
Phantom ESOP Plan
 
In 2001, the Company established the ISO Phantom ESOP (“phantom ESOP”) for eligible employees of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. Eligible employees will participate in the phantom ESOP if they complete 1,000 hours of service each plan year and are employed on December 31 of that year. The Company provides annual contributions to eligible participants in notional shares based on the value of ISO Class A common stock. Participants vest once they have completed four years and 1,000 hours of service. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, compensation expense related to the phantom ESOP amounted to $601, $608 and $228, respectively. A phantom ESOP liability of $2,153 and $1,785 at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
 
17.   Pension and Postretirement Benefits:
 
Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company maintained a qualified defined benefit pension plan for substantially all of its employees through membership in the Pension Plan for Insurance Organizations (the “Pension Plan”), a multiple-employer trust. The Company has applied the projected unit credit cost method for its pension plan, which attributes an equal portion of total projected benefits to each year of employee service. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company amended the Pension Plan to determine future benefits using a cash balance formula. Under the cash balance formula, each participant has an account which is credited annually based on salary rates determined by years of service, as well as the interest earned on their previous year end cash balance. Prior to December 31, 2001, pension plan benefits were based on years of service and the average of the five highest consecutive years’ earnings of the last ten years. Effective March 1, 2005, the


F-69


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Company established the Profit Sharing Plan, a defined contribution plan, to replace the Pension Plan for all eligible employees hired on or after March 1, 2005. The Company also has a non-qualified supplemental cash balance plan (“SERP”) for certain employees. The SERP is funded from the general assets of the Company. The SERP liability of $190 and $10,333 is included in short-term pension and postretirement benefits and pension benefits, respectively at December 31, 2007.
 
The Pension Plan’s funding policy is to contribute annually at an amount between the minimum funding requirements set forth in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. The Company contributed $167, $224 and $178 to the SERP in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and expects to contribute $339 in 2008. There was no minimum required funding for the Pension Plan for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007. The Company expects to contribute $5,500 to the Pension Plan in 2008.
 
The Pension Plan assets consist primarily of investments in various fixed income and equity funds. Investment guidelines are established with each investment manager. These guidelines provide the parameters within which the investment managers agree to operate, including criteria that determine eligible and ineligible securities, diversification requirements and credit quality standards, where applicable. Investment managers are prohibited from entering into any speculative hedging transactions. The investment objective is to achieve a maximum total return with strong emphasis on preservation of capital in real terms. The domestic equity portion of the total portfolio should range between 40% and 60%. The international equity portion of the total portfolio should range between 10% and 20%. The fixed income portion of the total portfolio should range between 20% and 40%. The asset allocation at December 31, 2006 and 2007, and target allocation for 2008 by asset category are as follows:
 
                         
    Percentage of Plan Assets     Target
 
Asset Category
  2006     2007     Allocation  
 
Equity securities
    62 %     62 %     60 %
Debt securities
    36 %     36 %     40 %
Other
    2 %     2 %     0 %
                         
Total
    100 %     100 %     100 %
 
The expected rate of return on plan assets for 2006 and 2007 of 8.25% is determined by examining expected long term rates of return for each asset class.
 
The Company also provides certain healthcare and life insurance benefits for both active and retired employees. The Postretirement Health and Life Insurance Plan (the “Postretirement Plan”) is contributory, requiring participants to pay a stated percentage of the premium for coverage. As of October 1, 2001, the Postretirement Plan was amended to freeze benefits for current retirees and certain other employees at the January 1, 2002 level. Also, as of October 1, 2001, the Postretirement Plan had a curtailment, which eliminated retiree life insurance for all active employees and healthcare benefits for almost all future retirees, effective January 1, 2002.
 
As discussed in “Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” the Company adopted FAS No. 158 as of December 31, 2006. FAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan pension and other post retirement benefit in the balance sheet; the recognition in other comprehensive income of gains or losses and prior service costs or credits arising during the period, but which are not included as components of periodic benefit cost and the measurement of defined benefit


F-70


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
plan assets and obligations as of the balance sheet date. Additional minimum pension liabilities were derecognized upon adoption. The adoption of FAS No. 158 affected the consolidated balance sheet as follows:
 
         
    December 31, 2006  
 
Decrease in accrued and minimum pension liability
  $ 1,687  
Increase in postretirement benefits obligations — current
    (4,070 )
Decrease in postretirement benefits obligations — noncurrent
    679  
Increase in pension benefits obligation
    (23,248 )
         
Increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax
    (24,952 )
Increase in deferred income tax
    9,317  
         
Increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
  $ (15,635 )
         
 
The following tables set forth the changes in the benefit obligations and the plan assets, the unfunded status of the Pension Plan and Postretirement Plan, and the amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at December 31:
 
                                 
    Pension Plan     Postretirement Plan  
    2006     2007     2006     2007  
 
Change in benefit obligation:
                               
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
  $ 373,375     $ 373,674     $ 32,561     $ 30,595  
Service cost
    8,464       8,152       5        
Interest cost
    20,054       20,952       1,716       1,669  
Actuarial (gain) loss
    (8,612 )     (15,934 )     (476 )     441  
Plan participants’ contributions
                1,894       2,227  
Benefits paid
    (19,607 )     (23,004 )     (5,497 )     (6,936 )
Federal subsidy on benefits paid
                392       344  
                                 
Benefit obligation at end of year
  $ 373,674     $ 363,840     $ 30,595     $ 28,340  
                                 
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
  $ 350,378     $ 341,829                  
                                 
Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31, used to determine benefit obligation:
                               
Discount rate
    5.75 %     6.25 %     5.75 %     5.75 %
Rate of compensation increase
    3.75 %     4.25 %     N/A       N/A  
Change in plan assets:
                               
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
  $ 338,338     $ 344,235     $     $  
Actual return on plan assets, net of expenses
    25,280       24,604              
Employer contributions
    224       178       3,211       4,365  
Plan participants’ contributions
                1,894       2,227  
Benefits paid
    (19,607 )     (23,004 )     (5,497 )     (6,936 )
Subsidies received/receivable
                392       344  
                                 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
  $ 344,235     $ 346,013     $     $  
                                 
Unfunded status at end of year
  $ (29,439 )   $ (17,827 )   $ (30,595 )   $ (28,340 )
                                 


F-71


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The pre-tax components affecting accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 are summarized below:
 
                                 
    Pension Plan     Postretirement Plan  
    2006     2007     2006     2007  
 
Transition obligation
  $     $     $ 997     $ 831  
Prior service benefit
    (4,918 )   $ (4,117 )         $  
Actuarial losses
    28,166       14,515       2,394       2,833  
                                 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, pretax
  $ 23,248     $ 10,398     $ 3,391     $ 3,664  
                                 
 
The components of net periodic benefit cost are summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:
 
                                                 
    Pension Plan     Postretirement Plan  
    2005     2006     2007     2005     2006     2007  
 
Service cost
  $ 8,413     $ 8,464     $ 8,152     $ 18     $ 5     $  
Interest cost
    19,755       20,054       20,952       1,866       1,716       1,669  
Amortization of transition obligation
                      166       166       166  
Recognized net actuarial loss
                      21       4       2  
Expected return on plan assets
    (27,219 )     (26,430 )     (27,458 )                  
Amortization of prior service cost
    (801 )     (801 )     (801 )                  
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    607       901       572                    
                                                 
Net periodic expense
  $ 755     $ 2,188     $ 1,417     $ 2,071     $ 1,891     $ 1,837  
                                                 
 
The amounts recognized in other comprehensive income at December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are summarized below:
 
                                                 
    Pension Plan     Postretirement Plan  
    2005     2006     2007     2005     2006     2007  
 
Transition obligation
    N/A       N/A     $       N/A       N/A     $ (166 )
Amortization of actuarial (gains) losses
    N/A       N/A       (572 )     N/A       N/A        
Amortization of prior service benefit
    N/A       N/A       801       N/A       N/A        
Actuarial (gains) losses
    N/A       N/A       (13,079 )     N/A       N/A       439  
                                                 
Total recognized in other comprehensive income
    N/A       N/A       (12,850 )     N/A       N/A       273  
                                                 
Total recognized in net periodic expense and other comprehensive income
  $ 755     $ 2,188     $ (11,433 )   $ 2,071     $ 1,891     $ 2,110  
                                                 


F-72


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The estimated amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that is expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) during 2008 are summarized below:
 
                         
    Pension
    Postretirement
       
    Plan     Plan     Total  
 
Transition obligation
  $     $ 166     $ 166  
Prior service benefit
    (801 )           (801 )
Actuarial losses
    470             470  
                         
Total
  $ (331 )   $ 166     $ (165 )
                         
 
The weighted-average assumptions as of January 1, 2005, 2006 and 2007 used to determine net periodic benefit cost and the amount recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are provided below:
 
                                                 
    Pension Plan     Postretirement Plan  
    2005     2006     2007     2005     2006     2007  
 
Weighted-average assumptions as of January 1, used to determine net benefit cost:
                                               
Discount rate
    5.75 %     5.50 %     5.75 %     5.75 %     5.50 %     5.75 %
Expected return on plan assets
    8.50 %     8.25 %     8.25 %     N/A       N/A       N/A  
Rate of compensation increase
    3.75 %     3.75 %     3.75 %     N/A       N/A       N/A  
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
                                               
Short-term accrued benefit liability
          $ (254 )   $ (190 )           $ (4,070 )   $ (4,446 )
Accrued benefit liability
            (29,185 )     (17,637 )             (26,525 )     (23,894 )
                                                 
Total accrued benefit liability
          $ (29,439 )   $ (17,827 )           $ (30,595 )   $ (28,340 )
                                                 
 
The following table presents the estimated future benefit payments for the respective plans. The future benefit payments for the postretirement plan are net of the federal Medicare subsidy.
 
                 
    Pension
    Postretirement
 
    Plan     Plan  
 
2008
  $ 22,139     $ 4,574  
2009
  $ 23,051     $ 4,368  
2010
  $ 24,184     $ 4,062  
2011
  $ 25,522     $ 3,722  
2012
  $ 26,998     $ 3,291  
2013-2017
  $ 164,039     $ 11,156  
 
The healthcare cost trend rate for 2007 was 11% gradually decreasing to 5% in 2013. Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the healthcare plan. A 1% change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 
                 
    1% Decrease     1% Increase  
 
Effect on total of service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement healthcare benefit cost
  $ (7 )   $ 4  
                 
Effect on the healthcare component of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
  $ (136 )   $ 76  
                 


F-73


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The expected subsidy from the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 reduced the Company’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $11,911 and $9,500 as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the net periodic benefit cost by approximately $1,407, $1,315 and $946 in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
 
18.   Segment Reporting
 
FAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (“FAS No. 131”), establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. FAS No. 131 requires that a public business enterprise report financial and descriptive information about its reportable operating segments. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s CEO and Chairman of the Board is identified as the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) as defined by FAS No. 131. To align with the internal management of the Company’s business operations based on product and service offerings, the Company is organized into the following two operating segments:
 
Risk Assessment:   The Company is a leading provider of statistical, actuarial and underwriting data for the U.S. P&C insurance industry. The Company’s databases include cleansed and standardized records describing premiums and losses in insurance transactions, casualty and property risk attributes for commercial buildings and their occupants and fire suppression capabilities of municipalities. The Company uses this data to create policy language and proprietary risk classifications that are industry standards and to generate prospective loss cost estimates used to price insurance policies.
 
Decision Analytics:   The Company develops solutions that its customers use to analyze the four key processes in managing risk: ‘prediction of loss,’ ‘selection and pricing of risk,’ ‘detection and prevention of fraud’ and ‘quantification of loss.’ The Company’s combination of algorithms and analytic methods incorporates its proprietary data to generate solutions in each of these four categories. In most cases, the Company’s customers integrate the solutions into their models, formulas or underwriting criteria in order to predict potential loss events, ranging from hurricanes and earthquakes to unanticipated healthcare claims. The Company develops catastrophe and extreme event models and offer solutions covering natural and man-made risks, including acts of terrorism. The Company also develops solutions that allow customers to quantify costs after loss events occur. Fraud solutions include data on claim histories, analysis of mortgage applications to identify misinformation, analysis of claims to find emerging patterns of fraud and identification of suspicious claims in the insurance, mortgage and healthcare sectors.
 
The two aforementioned operating segments represent the segments for which separate discrete financial information is available and upon which operating results are regularly evaluated by the CODM in order to assess performance and allocate resources. The Company uses segment EBITDA as the profitability measure for making decisions regarding ongoing operations. Segment EBITDA is income from continuing operations before investment income and interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Segment EBITDA is used to assess corporate performance and is the measure of operating results and to assess optimal utilization of debt and acquisitions by operating segment. Segment operating expenses consist of direct and indirect costs principally related to personnel, facilities, software license fees, consulting, travel, and third-party information services. Indirect costs are generally allocated to the segments using fixed rates established by management based upon estimated expense contribution levels and other assumptions that management considers reasonable. The Company does not allocate investment income, realized gains/(losses), interest income, interest expense or income tax expense, since these items are not considered in evaluating the segment’s overall operating performance. The CODM does not evaluate the financial performance of each


F-74


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
segment based on assets. On a geographic basis, no individual country outside of the United States accounted for 1% or more of the Company’s consolidated revenue for the years ending December 31, 2005, 2006 or 2007. No individual country outside of the United States accounted for 1% or more of total consolidated long-term assets as of December 31, 2006 or 2007.
 
The following table provides the Company’s revenue and operating income performance by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, as well as a reconciliation to “Income from continuing operations before income taxes” for all years presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations:
 
                         
    2005  
    Risk
    Decision
       
    Assessment     Analytics     Total  
 
Revenues
  $ 448,875     $ 196,785     $ 645,660  
Expenses:
                       
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)
    191,516       103,395       294,911  
Selling, general, and administrative
    61,408       27,315       88,723  
                         
Segment EBITDA
    195,951       66,075       262,026  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    14,373       7,651       22,024  
Amortization of intangible assets
    3,239       16,561       19,800  
                         
Operating income
    178,339       41,863       220,202  
                         
Unallocated expenses:
                       
Investment income
                    2,919  
Realized gains on securities, net
                    27  
Interest expense
                    (10,465 )
Other expense
                    (14 )
                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes
                  $ 212,669  
                         
Capital expenditures
  $ 24,379     $ 8,352     $ 32,731  
                         
 


F-75


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                         
    2006  
    Risk
    Decision
       
    Assessment     Analytics     Total  
 
Revenues
  $ 472,634     $ 257,499     $ 730,133  
Expenses:
                       
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)
    203,878       127,926       331,804  
Selling, general, and administrative
    65,884       34,240       100,124  
                         
Segment EBITDA
    202,872       95,333       298,205  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    17,931       10,076       28,007  
Amortization of intangible assets
    3,001       23,853       26,854  
                         
Operating income
    181,940       61,404       243,344  
                         
Unallocated expenses:
                       
Investment income
                    6,585  
Realized losses on securities, net
                    (375 )
Interest expense
                    (16,668 )
Other expense
                    (109 )
                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes
                  $ 232,777  
                         
Capital expenditures
  $ 11,753     $ 13,989     $ 25,742  
                         
 
                         
    2007  
    Risk
    Decision
       
    Assessment     Analytics     Total  
 
Revenues
  $ 485,160     $ 317,035     $ 802,195  
Expenses:
                       
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)
    204,182       153,009       357,191  
Selling, general, and administrative
    68,198       39,378       107,576  
                         
Segment EBITDA
    212,780       124,648       337,428  
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
    19,397       12,348       31,745  
Amortization of intangible assets
    1,047       32,869       33,916  
                         
Operating income
    192,336       79,431       271,767  
                         
Unallocated expenses:
                       
Investment income
                    8,442  
Realized gains on securities, net
                    857  
Interest expense
                    (22,928 )
Other income
                    9  
                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes
                  $ 258,147  
                         
Capital expenditures
  $ 33,059     $ 14,124     $ 47,183  
                         

F-76


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Operating segment revenue by type of service is provided below:
 
                         
    For the Years Ended December 31,  
    2005     2006     2007  
 
Risk Assessment
                       
Industry standard insurance programs
    290,204       303,957       311,087  
Property-specific rating and underwriting information
    114,467       123,627       126,291  
Statistical agency and data services
    25,228       25,793       27,282  
Actuarial services
    18,976       19,257       20,500  
                         
Total Risk Assessment
    448,875       472,634       485,160  
Decision Analytics
                       
Fraud identification and detection solutions
    143,258       168,189       172,726  
Loss prediction solutions
    53,527       67,129       81,110  
Loss quantification solutions
          22,181       63,199  
                         
Total Decision Analytics
    196,785       257,499       317,035  
                         
Total consolidated revenues
  $ 645,660     $ 730,133     $ 802,195  
                         
 
19.   Related Parties:
 
The Company considers its Class A and Class B stockholders that own more than 5% of the outstanding stock within the respective class to be related parties as defined within FAS No. 57 Related Party Disclosures. At December 31, 2007, there were six Class B stockholders each owning more than 5% of the outstanding Class B shares. Two of these six Class B stockholders have employees that serve on the Company’s board of directors.
 
The Company incurred expenses associated with the payment of insurance coverage premiums to certain of the largest stockholders aggregating $1,911, $487, and $827 in 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. These expenses are included in cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
At December 31, 2007, there were three Class A stockholders each owning more than 5% of the outstanding Class A shares. One of these stockholders had total indebtedness to the Company of $10,588 at December 31, 2007. This indebtedness was repaid subsequent to December 31, 2007. Another of these stockholders is the ESOP. As discussed in Note 16, in December 2004, the Company repaid the prior ESOP loan with an unrelated third party and entered into a loan agreement with the KSOP, which requires quarterly payments through December 31, 2013. As debt is repaid, shares are released to the ESOP to fund 401(k) matching and profit sharing contributions and the remainder is allocated annually to active employees in proportion to their eligible compensation in relation to total participant eligible compensation.


F-77


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
20.   Commitments and Contingencies:
 
The Company’s operations are conducted on leased premises. Approximate minimum rentals under long-term noncancelable leases for all leased premises, computer equipment and automobiles are as follows:
 
                         
    Operating
    Capital
       
Years Ending
  Leases     Leases        
 
2008
  $ 19,285     $ 4,818          
2009
    18,900       4,136          
2010
    18,215       3,283          
2011
    18,250       164          
2012
    17,312                
2013-2017
    75,445                
2018-2022
    42,002                
                         
Net minimum lease payments
  $ 209,409     $ 12,401          
                         
Less amount representing interest
            (694 )        
                         
Present value of net minimum lease capital payments
          $ 11,707          
                         
 
Most of the leases require payment of property taxes and utilities and, in certain cases, contain renewal options. Operating leases consist of office space. Capital leases consist of computer equipment, office equipment, and leased automobiles. Rent expense on operating leases approximated $19,083, $19,258 and $19,833 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
 
In addition, the Company is a party to legal proceedings with respect to a variety of matters in the ordinary course of business. Including those matters described below, the Company is unable, at the present time, to determine the ultimate resolution of or provide a reasonable estimate of the range of possible loss attributable to these matters or the impact they may have on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. This is primarily because many of these cases remain in their early stages and only limited discovery has taken place. Although the Company believes it has strong defenses for the litigations proceedings described below, the Company could in the future incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
 
Claims Outcome Advisor Litigation
 
Hensley, et al. v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al. is a putative nationwide class action complaint, filed in February 2005, in Miller County, Arkansas state court. Defendants include numerous insurance companies and providers of software products used by insurers in paying claims. The Company is among the named defendants. Plaintiffs allege that certain software products, including the Company’s Claims Outcome Advisor product and a competing software product sold by Computer Sciences Corporation, improperly estimated the amount to be paid by insurers to their policyholders in connection with claims for bodily injuries. On August 18, 2008, the Company was voluntarily dismissed from the case with prejudice.
 
The Company has entered into settlement agreements with plaintiffs asserting claims relating to the use of Claims Outcome Advisor by defendants Hanover Insurance Group, Progressive Car Insurance, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group. Each of these settlements has been granted final approval by the court and together they resolve the claims asserted in this case against the Company with respect to the above insurance companies, who settled the claims against them as well. A provision was recorded in 2006 for this proceeding and the total amount the Company paid in 2008 with respect to these settlements was less than $2 million. A fourth defendant, The Automobile Club of California that is alleged to have used Claims Outcome Advisor


F-78


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
has not settled. Plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss the Company from the case with prejudice once a discovery dispute relating to certain documents is resolved.
 
Xactware Litigation
 
The following two have been filed by or on behalf of groups of Louisiana insurance policyholders who claim, among other things, that certain insurers who used products and price information supplied by the Company’s Xactware subsidiary (and those of another provider) did not fully compensate policyholders for property damage covered under their insurance policies. The plaintiffs seek to recover compensation for their damages in an amount equal to the difference between the amount paid by the defendants and the fair market repair/restoration costs of their damaged property.
 
Schafer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. , et al. is a putative class action pending against the Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company filed in March 2007 in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaint alleged antitrust violations, breach of contract, negligence, bad faith, and fraud. The court dismissed the antitrust claim as to both defendants and dismissed all claims against the Company other than fraud, which will proceed to the discovery phase along with the remaining claims against State Farm. Plaintiffs have moved to certify a class with respect to the fraud and breach of contract claims which the defendants will oppose.
 
Mornay v. Travelers Ins. Co. , et al. is a putative class action pending against the Company and Travelers Insurance Company filed in November 2007 in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaint alleged antitrust violations, breach of contract, negligence, bad faith, and fraud. As in Schafer, the court dismissed the antitrust claim as to both defendants and dismissed all claims against the Company other than fraud. The court has stayed all proceedings pending an appraisal of the lead plaintiffs’ insurance claims.
 
The third lawsuit, Louisiana ex rel. Foti v. Allstate Ins. Co. , is a putative parens patriae action filed by the Louisiana Attorney General filed in November 2007 in Louisiana state court against numerous insurance companies, the Company, and other solution providers, and consultants. The complaint contains allegations of an antitrust conspiracy among the defendants with respect to the payment of insurance claims for property damage and seeks the forfeiture of any illegal profits and treble damages. Defendants removed the case to the Eastern District of Louisiana. A motion to remand the case to state court was denied by the district court and that denial was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss and plaintiffs are opposing the motion.
 
At this time it is not possible to determine the ultimate resolution of, or estimate the liability related to, these matters. No provision for losses has been provided in connection with the Xactware Litigation.
 
iiX Litigation
 
In March 2007, the Company’s Insurance Information Exchange, or iiX, subsidiary, as well as other information providers and insurers in the State of Texas, were served with a summons and class action complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging violations of the Driver Privacy Protection Act, or the DPPA. Plaintiffs brought the action on their own behalf and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals whose personal information is contained in any motor vehicle record maintained by the State of Texas and who have not provided express consent to the State of Texas for the distribution of their personal information for purposes not enumerated by the DPPA and whose personal information has been knowingly obtained and used by the defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants knowingly obtained such personal information and that the obtaining and use of this personal information was not for a purpose authorized by the DPPA. The complaint seeks liquidated damages in the amount of $2,500 for each instance of a violation of DPPA, punitive damages and the destruction of any illegally obtained personal information. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on failure to state a claim and lack of standing and a decision on that motion is pending.


F-79


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
21.   Subsequent Events
 
On June 27, 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved certain corporate governance changes necessary to allow the Company to proceed with a proposed initial public offering (“IPO”). Immediately prior to the completion of the proposed IPO, the Company will undergo a corporate reorganization whereby the Class A and Class B common stock of the Company will be exchanged by the current stockholders for the common stock of Verisk Analytics, Inc. (“Verisk”) on a one-for-one basis. Verisk, formed on May 23, 2008, was established to serve as the parent holding company of Insurance Services Office, Inc.
 
All stock options granted under the Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1996 Incentive Plan will be transferred to Verisk, without modification to the terms of the options other than such options will be exercisable for Class A common stock of Verisk. Class A common stock of Verisk will not be redeemable by the holder and only Class A common stock will be offered to the public.
 
Upon consummation of the IPO, two new series of Class B common stock, Class B (Series 1) common stock (the “Class B-1”) and Class B (Series 2) common stock (the “Class B-2”) will be formed and 50 percent of each Class B stockholders’ existing Class B common stock will be converted into shares of new Class B-1 common stock and the remaining 50 percent of each Class B stockholders’ existing Class B common stock will be converted into shares of new Class B-2 common stock. Each share of Class B-1 common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the stockholder, into one share of Class A common stock 18 months after the date of the IPO. Each share of Class B-2 common stock shall convert automatically, without any action by the stockholder, into one share of Class A common stock 30 months after the date of the IPO. In conjunction with the IPO, Verisk plans to effect a stock split of both classes of common stock. The strike price of stock options will be adjusted based on the effect of the stock split.
 
The Company provided full recourse loans to directors and senior management in connection with exercising their stock options. This loan program has been terminated and all of such loans have been repaid.
 
22.   Correction of an Error
 
In preparation for the initial public offering, the Company undertook a comprehensive review of its revenue recognition policies. As a result of this review conducted subsequent to issuance of the Company’s 2007 consolidated financial statements, it was decided that the revenue recognition for certain license agreements under the provision of SOP No. 97-2 were not correctly applied. As a result, the Company overstated “Revenues” and understated “Fees received in advance” related to these license agreements.


F-80


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following financial statement line items were impacted by the correction in the respective periods presented below:
 
                                 
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2005  
          Adjustment for
             
    As Previously
    Discontinued
    Correction
    As
 
Caption of Consolidated Statement of Operations   Reported     Operations     of Errors     Corrected  
 
Revenues
  $ 651,340     $ (4,249 )   $ (1,431 )   $ 645,660  
Operating income
    218,275       3,358       (1,431 )     220,202  
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    210,805       3,295       (1,431 )     212,669  
Provision for income taxes
    (85,534 )     (721 )     533       (85,722 )
Income from continuing operations
    125,271       2,574       (898 )     126,947  
Net income
    125,271             (898 )     124,373  
Basic income per share of Class A and Class B from continuing operations
    29.41       0.61       (0.21 )     29.81  
Basic net income per share of Class A and Class B
    29.41             (0.21 )     29.20  
Diluted income per share of Class A and Class B from continuing operations
    28.08       0.58       (0.21 )     28.45  
Diluted net income per share of Class A and Class B
    28.08             (0.21 )     27.87  
 
                         
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2006  
    As Previously
    Correction
       
Caption of Consolidated Statement of Operations   Reported     of Errors     As Corrected  
 
Revenues
  $ 731,636     $ (1,503 )   $ 730,133  
Operating income
    244,847       (1,503 )     243,344  
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    234,280       (1,503 )     232,777  
Provision for income taxes
    (87,498 )     577       (86,921 )
Income from continuing operations
    146,782       (926 )     145,856  
Net income
    144,977       (926 )     144,051  
Basic income per share of Class A and Class B from continuing operations
    35.54       (0.23 )     35.31  
Basic net income per share of Class A and Class B
    35.10       (0.23 )     34.87  
Diluted income per share of Class A and Class B from continuing operations
    34.07       (0.22 )     33.85  
Diluted net income per share of Class A and Class B
    33.65       (0.22 )     33.43  
 


F-81


Table of Contents

 
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                                 
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2007  
    As Previously
    Other
    Correction
    As
 
Caption of Consolidated Statement of Operations   Reported     Adjustments(1)     of Errors     Corrected  
 
Revenues
  $ 803,700     $     $ (1,505 )   $ 802,195  
Operating income
    273,272             (1,505 )     271,767  
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    259,652             (1,505 )     258,147  
Provision for income taxes
    (102,546 )     (1,221 )     583       (103,184 )
Income from continuing operations
    157,106       (1,221 )     (922 )     154,963  
Net income
    152,517       (1,221 )     (922 )     150,374  
Basic income per share of Class A and Class B from continuing operations
    39.11       (0.30 )     (0.23 )     38.58  
Basic net income per share of Class A and Class B
    37.97       (0.30 )     (0.23 )     37.44  
Diluted income per share of Class A and Class B from continuing operations
    37.53       (0.28 )     (0.22 )     37.03  
Diluted net income per share of Class A and Class B
    36.43       (0.28 )     (0.22 )     35.93  
 
                                 
    As of December 31, 2006  
    As Previously
    Other
    Correction
       
Caption of Consolidated Balance Sheet   Reported     Adjustments(1)     of Errors     As Corrected  
 
Current deferred income taxes
  $ 14,387     $     $ 4,632     $ 19,019  
Total current assets
    244,361             4,632       248,993  
Deferred income taxes
    37,315             (21 )     37,294  
Total assets
    740,120             4,611       744,731  
Fees received in advance
    112,509             11,627       124,136  
Total current liabilities
    317,554       254       11,627       329,435  
Total liabilities
    723,528             11,627       735,155  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (15,996 )           (21 )     (16,017 )
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
    729,971       (1,180,533 )     (6,995 )     (457,557 )
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    16,592       (1,125,933 )     (7,016 )     (1,116,357 )
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
    740,120             4,611       744,731  
 
                                 
    As of December 31, 2007  
    As Previously
    Other
    Correction
       
Caption of Consolidated Balance Sheet   Reported     Adjustments(1)     of Errors     As Corrected  
 
Current deferred income taxes
  $ 17,373     $ 66     $ 5,215     $ 22,654  
Total current assets
    172,741       3,069       5,215       181,025  
Deferred income taxes
    37,859       17,756       64       55,679  
Total assets
    802,379       20,825       5,279       828,483  
Fees received in advance
    114,776             13,131       127,907  
Total current liabilities
    339,566       (6,449 )     13,131       346,248  
Total liabilities
    807,507       32,385       13,131       853,023  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (8,763 )           64       (8,699 )
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
    882,488       (1,382,708 )     (7,916 )     (508,136 )
Total stockholders’ deficit
    (5,128 )     (1,182,748 )     (7,852 )     (1,195,728 )
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
    802,379       20,825       5,279       828,483  
 
 
(1) The “Other Adjustments” were required to prepare the financial statements for the initial public offering and do not represent a change from non-GAAP or incorrect GAAP to GAAP. These adjustments related to the adoption of FIN No. 48 (See note 11) and the classification of Class A shares as redeemable common stock (See note 14).

F-82


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
                 
    June 30,
    December 31,
 
    2006     2005  
    (Unaudited)        
 
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 12,289,605     $ 12,636,914  
Accounts receivable, net
    4,682,223       3,450,648  
Unbilled receivables
          117,267  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    721,689       433,839  
                 
Total current assets
    17,693,517       16,638,668  
Property and equipment:
               
Furniture and fixtures
    60,034       156,078  
Computer equipment and software
    13,402,836       13,574,229  
Leasehold improvements
    304,765       316,463  
Other
    314,526       228,531  
                 
      14,082,161       14,275,301  
Accumulated depreciation
    (9,172,370 )     (9,298,899 )
                 
Net property and equipment
    4,909,791       4,976,402  
Long-term portion of notes receivable from related parties
    270,320       145,320  
Other non-current assets
    285,750       368,616  
                 
Total assets
  $ 23,159,378     $ 22,129,006  
                 
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 782,137     $ 1,097,437  
Accrued compensation
    2,759,008       1,884,386  
Other accrued expenses
    131,336       101,825  
Deferred revenue
    4,963,189       3,822,190  
                 
Total current liabilities
    8,635,670       6,905,838  
Stockholders’ equity
               
Common stock — no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,836,870 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
    304,347       304,347  
Retained earnings
    14,219,361       14,918,821  
                 
Total stockholders’ equity
    14,523,708       15,223,168  
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 23,159,378     $ 22,129,006  
                 
 
See accompanying notes


F-83


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
 
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2006     2005  
 
Net revenues
  $ 25,249,061     $ 17,121,476  
Cost of revenues
    2,851,550       2,183,987  
Research and development expenses
    5,855,078       5,707,097  
Sales and marketing expenses
    2,046,968       1,532,302  
General and administrative expenses
    4,906,775       3,768,258  
                 
Total costs and expenses
    15,660,371       13,191,644  
                 
Income from operations
    9,588,690       3,929,832  
Interest and other expense
    (44,891 )     (94,993 )
Interest and other income
    289,588       88,541  
                 
Net income
  $ 9,833,387     $ 3,923,380  
                 
 
See accompanying notes


F-84


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
 
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2006     2005  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 9,833,387     $ 3,923,380  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    1,102,842       1,356,968  
Gain/Loss on disposal of assets
    34,666       8,037  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (1,231,575 )     857,714  
Unbilled Receivables
    117,267       995,062  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    (287,850 )     (156,427 )
Other non-current assets
    82,866       (92,416 )
Accounts payable
    (315,300 )     (688,882 )
Other accrued expenses
    29,511       345,739  
Accrued compensation
    874,622       276,134  
Deferred revenue
    1,140,999       (414,647 )
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    11,381,435       6,410,662  
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Change in notes receivable from related parties
    (125,000 )     (65,310 )
Purchase of property and equipment
    (1,070,897 )     (1,632,330 )
Proceeds from sale of assets
          9,500  
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (1,195,897 )     (1,688,140 )
Cash flow from financing activities:
               
Payments on long-term debt
          (2,262,606 )
Distributions paid to stockholders
    (10,532,847 )     (3,616,533 )
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (10,532,847 )     (5,879,139 )
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (347,309 )     (1,156,617 )
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    12,636,914       7,619,555  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 12,289,605       6,462,938  
                 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 10,225     $ 76,750  
 
See accompanying notes


F-85


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (Unaudited)
 
1.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Nature of Operations
 
Founded in 1986, Xactware, Inc. (“the Company”) is a privately held technology services company specializing in the property insurance, remodeling, and restoration industries. Xactware’s technology tools include software estimating programs for personal computers as well as powerful online systems for replacement cost calculations, estimate tracking, data trending in real time and multimedia construction training tools.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the full year.
 
Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries Xactware Business Services, LLC, Xactware Information Services, Inc., iSkills, Inc., Xactnet, Inc., and XactSites, Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company generates net revenues through software subscriptions, contracted development of software products, automated assignment workflow, online structural value estimates, support and maintenance of software products, and training.
 
Sales of software not under specific development contracts are recognized upon shipment provided that persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. The Company records amounts billed to customers related to shipping as revenue and all expenses related to shipping as a cost of revenues. Software subscriptions and renewals of support and maintenance revenues are deferred and recognized ratably over the contract periods. Transaction fee revenues associated with online structural value estimation and automated assignment workflow are recognized when transactions are completed. Training revenues are recognized when services are provided.
 
For development contracts involving a significant amount of services related to installation, modification, or customization of the software product, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the provisions of SOP No. 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (SOP 81-1). As prescribed by SOP 81-1, the Company recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method based upon available reliable estimates for the costs and effort necessary to complete the services.


F-86


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (Unaudited) — (Continued)
 
Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable are stated at cost, net of allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provide allowances when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. Unbilled receivables result from our recognition of contract revenue in advance of contractual billing or progress billing terms.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment is stated at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease or the useful life of the improvement, whichever is shorter. Other property and equipment includes recreational property and equipment. Maintenance and repairs that do not extend the life or improve the asset are expensed in the year incurred. Weighted average estimated useful lives are as follows:
 
         
Furniture and fixtures
    7 years  
Computer equipment and software
    5 years  
Leasehold improvements
    13 years  
Other
    14 years  
 
Research and Development
 
Research and development expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed , requires capitalization of certain software development costs subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility. Based on the Company’s product development process, technological feasibility is established upon the completion of a working model. For the year ended December 31, 2005 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 costs incurred by the Company between the completion of the working model and the point at which the product is ready for general release have been insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has charged all such costs to research and development expense in the period incurred.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company elects to file its federal and state income tax returns under the provisions of Subchapter S for Federal and Utah Revenue Codes, under which income and losses are passed through to the individual stockholders. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes in the accompanying financial statements.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
 
Concentration of Business and Credit Risk
 
The Company’s revenues are concentrated in the development of software programs for the insurance industry and software sales to insurance agents, independent adjusters, and contractors. Significant technological changes in customer requirements, or the emergence of competitive products with new capabilities or technologies, could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.


F-87


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (Unaudited) — (Continued)
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, sales to one major customer accounted for approximately $3.9 million or 15% of revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, sales to one major customer accounted for approximately $2.7 million or 15% of revenues.
 
December 31, 2005, two customers accounted for 8% and 6% of total accounts receivable, respectively. At June 30, 2006, two customers accounted for 15% and 13% of total accounts receivable, respectively.
 
The Company maintains 100% of its cash and cash equivalents in a federally insured bank. The Company’s deposits may at times, exceed federal insurance limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to its cash and cash equivalents.
 
The Company grants credit to substantially all of its customers without requiring collateral. This credit risk is mitigated by the financial stability of its major customers and the Company’s reserves for estimated losses. Historical credit losses have not been significant.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based employee compensation under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , as permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation . Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company measured stock-based compensation expense as the difference, if any, between the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and the exercise price.
 
Pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2005, regarding the effect of issuing stock options during the year on net income (loss) is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using the minimum value method, which assumes zero volatility, with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.93%; dividend yield of 0%; and a weighted-average expected life of the option of 8 years. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2005 is $.30.
 
If the Company had elected to account for employee stock option grants based on their fair value, as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net income would have been changed to the pro forma amounts as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2005:
 
         
Net Income, as reported
  $ 9,833,387  
Pro forma stock compensation expense
    (8,033 )
         
Pro forma net income
  $ 9,825,354  
         
 
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment , using the prospective transition method, which requires the Company to apply its provisions only to awards granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled after the effective date. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense recognized beginning January 1, 2006 is based on the following: (a) the grant-date fair value of stock option awards granted or modified after January 1, 2006; and (b) the balance of deferred stock-based compensation related to stock option awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, which was calculated using the intrinsic-value method as previously permitted under APB Opinion No. 25. Results for prior periods have not been restated.
 
During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company did not grant, modify, repurchase, or cancel any employee stock options. As of June 30, 2006, the Company did not have any deferred stock-based


F-88


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (Unaudited) — (Continued)
 
compensation related to stock option awards granted prior to January 1, 2006. Therefore, as a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment , using the prospective transition method, the Company did not record any stock-based compensation for the six month period ending June 30, 2006.
 
2.   Notes Receivable from Related Parties
 
                 
    June 30,
    December 31,
 
    2006     2005  
 
Note receivable from a related party, unsecured, due in full plus accrued interest at 8.25% in December 2008
  $ 20,320     $ 20,320  
Note receivable from a related party, unsecured, due in full plus accrued interest at 3.83% in December 2014
    250,000       125,000  
                 
    $ 270,320     $ 145,320  
                 
 
3.   Operating Lease Obligations
 
The Company leases vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases, which expire through December 2008. Lease terms are generally 24 to 39 months. In management’s opinion, the risk of loss on residual value guarantees is minimal. Total vehicle lease expense paid for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $76,762 and $75,683 respectively.
 
The Company leases office facilities under renewable month-to-month operating leases from limited liability corporations (LLC) owned by the stockholders of the Company. Total rent expense paid to these LLC’s for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $202,980 and $202,980, respectively. The Company also leases temporary office space under a 2 year operating lease agreement and additional temporary office space under month-to-month operating leases from third parties. Total rent expense for the temporary office space for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $68,572 and $60,057 respectively.
 
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases at June 30, 2006 are as follows:
 
         
July through December 2006
  $ 95,414  
2007
    116,077  
2008
    49,886  
2009
    16,385  
2010 and thereafter
     
         
Total minimum lease payments
  $ 277,762  
         
 
4.   Stockholders’ Equity
 
Common Stock
 
Authorized common stock consists of 90,000,000 shares of no par voting stock and 10,000,000 shares of no par non-voting stock. All shares have equal rights to distributions and have equal rights in the event of dissolution or liquidation. There were 20,836,870 no par voting shares outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.


F-89


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (Unaudited) — (Continued)
 
Stock Option Plan
 
The Company has adopted an Employee Stock Option Plan (the Plan) under which employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company or an affiliate or subsidiary are eligible for stock options. The Company has reserved 5,300,000 common shares under the Plan. The Plan allows grants of incentive options and nonqualified options to purchase common shares at a price that is not less than the fair market value on the date of grant. The Board of Directors determines the option price. Generally, the options have a 10-year life from the date of grant and vest 20% each year until fully vested.
 
A summary of stock option activity and related information is as follows:
 
                                 
          Outstanding
       
    Shares
    Stock Options     Weighted-
 
    Available
    Number of
    Price per
    Average
 
    for Grant     Shares     Share     Exercise Price  
 
Balance at January 1, 2005
    4,737,521       562,479     $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
Granted
                       
Cancelled
    19,114       (19,114 )   $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2005
    4,756,635       543,365     $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
Granted
                       
Cancelled
                       
                                 
Balance at June 30, 2006
    4,756,635       543,365     $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
                                 
 
There were 486,496 options exercisable as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of the options is three years.
 
5.   Related Party Transactions
 
The Company leases its office facilities from LLCs owned by the stockholders. During 2005, the Company issued two long-term notes receivable to a related parties in the amounts of $20,320 and $125,000, respectively.
 
6.   Employee Benefits
 
The Company has a qualified 401(k) profit sharing plan that allows employees to contribute an elected percentage of earnings to the plan. The Company makes a matching contribution of 75% of the contribution up to a maximum of 8% of eligible compensation. Additionally, the Company can make discretionary contributions. Employees are eligible to participate in the plan after three months of service and attainment of age 18.
 
The Company contributed $312,703 and $229,178 to the plan for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Matching contributions are accrued monthly and paid annually on or about December 31. On August 9, 2006, the Xactware, Inc. 401k plan was terminated. All accrued matching contributions were paid through that date.
 
7.   Subsequent Events
 
On August 8, 2006, approximately 100% of the assets of the Company were acquired by Insurance Services Office, Inc., a Delaware based corporation. The sale includes a contingent payment provision subject to the achievement of certain predetermined financial results for 2007 and 2008. In April 2008, the contingent payment provision for fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 resulted in an additional payment. In connection with this acquisition, all outstanding stock options were cancelled in exchange for a one time cash payment.


F-90


Table of Contents

 
Report of Independent Auditors
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Xactware, Inc.
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Xactware, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Xactware, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
 
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 5, 2006


F-91


Table of Contents

Xactware, Inc.
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
                 
    December 31  
    2005     2004  
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 12,636,914     $ 7,560,755  
Marketable securities
          58,800  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $170,000 and $85,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively
    3,450,648       2,600,970  
Unbilled receivables
    117,267       995,062  
Current portion of notes receivable from related parties
          99,513  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    433,839       320,369  
                 
Total current assets
    16,638,668       11,635,469  
Property and equipment:
               
Furniture and fixtures
    156,078       174,867  
Computer equipment and software
    13,574,229       14,126,285  
Leasehold improvements
    316,463       269,461  
Other
    228,531       527,499  
                 
      14,275,301       15,098,112  
Accumulated depreciation
    (9,298,899 )     (8,415,292 )
                 
Net property and equipment
    4,976,402       6,682,820  
Long-term portion of notes receivable from related parties
    145,320       107,652  
Other non-current assets
    368,616       302,892  
                 
Total assets
  $ 22,129,006     $ 18,728,833  
                 
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 1,097,437     $ 832,608  
Accrued compensation
    1,884,386       1,628,702  
Other accrued expenses
    101,825       35,088  
Deferred revenue
    3,822,190       2,394,736  
Current portion of long-term debt
          2,003,746  
                 
Total current liabilities
    6,905,838       6,894,880  
Long-term debt
          1,700,243  
                 
Total liabilities
    6,905,838       8,595,123  
Commitments and contingencies
               
Stockholders’ equity
               
Common stock — no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,836,870 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004
    304,347       304,347  
Retained earnings
    14,918,821       9,829,363  
                 
Total stockholders’ equity
    15,223,168       10,133,710  
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 22,129,006     $ 18,728,833  
                 
 
See accompanying notes.


F-92


Table of Contents

Xactware, Inc.
 
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
                 
    Years Ended December 31  
    2005     2004  
 
Net revenues
  $ 41,190,993     $ 32,700,070  
Cost of revenues
    4,964,774       4,307,031  
Research and development expenses
    12,133,116       10,617,525  
Sales and marketing expenses
    3,387,532       2,566,494  
General and administrative expenses
    7,350,424       6,808,460  
                 
Total costs and expenses
    27,835,846       24,299,510  
                 
Income from operations
    13,355,147       8,400,560  
Interest expense
    (135,013 )     (252,524 )
Interest and other income
    213,228       98,477  
                 
Net income
  $ 13,433,362     $ 8,246,513  
                 
 
See accompanying notes.


F-93


Table of Contents

Xactware, Inc,
 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
 
                                 
    Common Stock           Total
 
    Number
          Retained
    Stockholders’
 
    of Shares     Amount     Earnings     Equity  
 
Balance at January 1, 2004
    20,836,870     $ 304,347     $ 7,938,264     $ 8,242,611  
Distributions paid to stockholders
                    (6,355,414 )     (6,355,414 )
Net income
                    8,246,513       8,246,513  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2004
    20,836,870       304,347       9,829,363       10,133,710  
Distributions paid to stockholders
                (8,343,904 )     (8,343,904 )
Net income
                13,433,362       13,433,362  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2005
    20,836,870     $ 304,347     $ 14,918,821     $ 15,223,168  
                                 
 
See accompanying notes.


F-94


Table of Contents

Xactware, Inc.
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
                 
    Years Ended December 31  
    2005     2004  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 13,433,362     $ 8,246,513  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    2,528,710       2,602,690  
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets
    37,755       (55 )
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
    (1,817 )     (33,572 )
Purchase of marketable securities classified as trading
          (37,741 )
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities classified as trading
    60,617       58,013  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (849,678 )     (281,675 )
Unbilled Receivables
    877,795       (995,062 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    (113,470 )     (19,028 )
Other non-current assets
    (65,724 )     (74,559 )
Accounts payable
    264,829       (423,275 )
Other accrued expenses
    66,737       15,558  
Accrued compensation
    255,684       242,661  
Deferred revenue
    1,427,454       197,181  
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    17,922,254       9,497,649  
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Change in notes receivable from related parties
    61,845       52,838  
Purchase of property and equipment
    (2,262,854 )     (2,588,874 )
Proceeds from sale of assets
    158,600       1,087  
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (2,042,409 )     (2,534,949 )
Cash flow from financing activities:
               
Proceeds from long-term debt
          3,334,739  
Payment on long-term debt
    (3,703,989 )     (2,655,553 )
Distributions paid to stockholders
    (7,099,697 )     (6,355,414 )
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (10,803,686 )     (5,676,228 )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    5,076,159       1,286,472  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    7,560,755       6,274,283  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 12,636,914     $ 7,560,755  
                 
Noncash and supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 135,013     $ 244,053  
                 
Distribution of assets to stockholders
  $ 1,244,207        
 
See accompanying notes.


F-95


Table of Contents

Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2005
 
1.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Nature of Operations
 
Founded in 1986, Xactware, Inc. is a privately held technology services company specializing in the property insurance, remodeling, and restoration industries. Xactware’s technology tools include software estimating programs for personal computers as well as powerful online systems for replacement cost calculations, estimate tracking, data trending in real time and multimedia construction training tools.
 
Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries Xactware Business Services, LLC, Xactware Information Services, Inc., iSkills, Inc., Xactnet, Inc., and XactSites, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
 
Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to use certain estimates and assumptions. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although management believes its estimates are appropriate, changes in assumptions utilized in preparing such estimates could cause these estimates to change in the future.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company generates net revenues through software subscriptions, contracted development of software products, automated assignment workflow, online structural value estimates, support and maintenance of software products, and training.
 
Sales of software licenses not under specific development contracts are recognized upon shipment provided that persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. The Company records amounts billed to customers related to shipping as revenue and all expenses related to shipping as a cost of revenues. Software subscriptions and renewals of support and maintenance revenues are deferred and recognized ratably over the contract periods. Transaction fee revenues associated with online structural value estimation and automated assignment workflow are recognized when transactions are completed. Training revenues are recognized when services are provided.
 
For development contracts involving a significant amount of services related to installation, modification, or customization of the software licensed product, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the provisions of SOP No. 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (“SOP 81-1”). As prescribed by SOP 81-1, the Company recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method based upon available reliable estimates for the costs and effort necessary to complete the services.


F-96


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement — (Continued)
 
Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable are stated at cost, net of allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provides allowances when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. Unbilled receivables result from our recognition of contract revenue in advance of contractual billing or progress billing terms.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment is stated at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease or the useful life of the improvement, whichever is shorter. Other property and equipment includes recreational property and equipment. Maintenance and repairs that do not extend the life or improve the asset are expensed in the year incurred. Weighted average estimated useful lives are as follows:
 
         
Furniture and fixtures
    7 years  
Computer equipment and software
    5 years  
Leasehold improvements
    13 years  
Other
    14 years  
 
The Company purchased additional recreational property and equipment during the year that had a carrying value of approximately $760,000 when it was distributed to stockholders. The Company distributed recreational property and equipment that had a total carrying value of approximately $1.2 million to its stockholders during 2005.
 
Research and Development
 
Research and development expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed , requires capitalization of certain software development costs subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility. Based on the Company’s product development process, technological feasibility is established upon the completion of a working model. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 costs incurred by the Company between the completion of the working model and the point at which the product is ready for general release have been insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has charged all such costs to research and development expense in the period incurred.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company elects to file its federal and state income tax returns under the provisions of Subchapter S for Federal and Utah Revenue Codes, under which income and losses are passed through to the individual stockholders. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes in the accompanying financial statements.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.


F-97


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement — (Continued)
 
Concentration of Business and Credit Risk
 
The Company’s revenues are concentrated in the development of software programs for the insurance industry and software sales to insurance agents, independent adjusters, and contractors. Significant technological changes in customer requirements, or the emergence of competitive products with new capabilities or technologies, could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2005, sales to one major customer accounted for approximately $7.2 million or 17% of revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2004, sales to one major customer accounted for approximately $6.0 million or 18% of revenues. At December 31, 2005, two customers accounted for 8% and 6% of total accounts receivable, respectively. At December 31, 2004, two customers accounted for 29% and 12% of total accounts receivable, respectively.
 
The Company maintains 100% of its cash and cash equivalents in a federally insured bank. The Company’s deposits may at times, exceed federal insurance limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to its cash and cash equivalents.
 
The Company grants credit to substantially all of its customers without requiring collateral. This credit risk is mitigated by the financial stability of its major customers and the Company’s reserves for estimated losses. Historical credit losses have not been significant.
 
Advertising
 
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were $84,635 and $41,758, respectively. Trade show expenses were $78,878 and $65,402 for 2005 and 2004, respectively.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options rather than adopting the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation . Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
 
Pro forma information regarding the net income effect of issuing stock options is required by SFAS No. 123 as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method. The Company did not grant any stock options for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
 
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized over the options’ vesting period. The stock compensation expense included in the pro forma disclosure below reflects the amortization of the estimated fair value of options granted prior to the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The full impact on pro forma net income may not be representative of compensation expense in future years.


F-98


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement — (Continued)
 
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss if the Company had applied the fair-value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation.
 
                 
    December 31  
    2005     2004  
 
Net income, as reported
  $ 13,433,362     $ 8,246,513  
Less stock compensation expense determined under the fair value method
    (16,066 )     (17,327 )
                 
Pro forma net income
  $ 13,417,296     $ 8,229,186  
                 
 
Comprehensive Income
 
The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income . There are no items of other comprehensive income in any of the periods presented and, therefore, net income equals total comprehensive income for all periods.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, as revised, Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R), which requires the cost resulting from all stock-based payment transactions to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. Under FAS 123R, the fair value based method for recognition of compensation expense is required to be applied using the prospective transition method. The Company currently measures compensation expense for stock-based employee and director compensation under the intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognize no compensation costs for these options. The adoption of FAS 123R is not expected to have a material impact on The Company’s consolidated financial statements. The adoption of FAS 123R is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2006.


F-99


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement — (Continued)
 
2.   Notes Receivable from Related Parties
 
                 
    December 31  
    2005     2004  
 
Note receivable from a limited liability corporation owned by the Company’s majority stockholder, unsecured, due in monthly installments of $526, including interest at 10.00%, due July 2006
  $     $ 9,209  
Note receivable from a limited liability corporation owned by the Company’s majority stockholder, unsecured, due in monthly installments of $1,373, including interest at 10.00%, due July 2006
          24,040  
Note receivable from a stockholder, unsecured, due in annual installments of $17,751, plus accrued interest at 2.88%, due in April 2005
          17,710  
Note receivable from a stockholder, unsecured, due in annual installments of $27,465, plus accrued interest at 2.88%, due in April 2005
          27,399  
Note receivable from a related party, unsecured, due in full plus accrued interest at 4% in August 2005
          10,000  
Note receivable from a related party, unsecured, due in full plus accrued interest at 4.5% in September 2005
          12,000  
Note receivable from a limited liability corporation owned by the Company’s majority stockholder, unsecured, due in monthly installments of $1,461, including interest at 5.44%, due May 2012
          106,807  
Note receivable from a related party, unsecured, due in full plus accrued interest at 8.25% in December 2008
    20,320        
Note receivable from a related party, unsecured, due in full plus accrued interest at 3.83% in December 2014
    125,000        
                 
      145,320       207,165  
Current portion
          (99,513 )
                 
    $ 145,320     $ 107,652  
                 
 
3.   Marketable Securities
 
In 2005 and 2004, the Company purchased equity securities classified as trading securities totaling $0 and $37,741, respectively. Also, in 2005 and 2004 the Company sold equity securities classified as trading securities totaling $60,617 and $58,013, respectively. These securities were valued at their fair value at December 31, 2004, based on quoted market prices on a national stock exchange. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, unrealized and realized holding gains and losses were included in net income. The Company recognized a gain of $1,817 and $33,572 on the securities in 2005 and 2004 respectively. At December 31, 2004, $2,859 of the gain relates to trading securities held by the Company. The Company sold its remaining equity securities during 2005.


F-100


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement — (Continued)
 
4.   Long-Term Debt
 
                 
    December 31  
    2005     2004  
 
Note payable to bank, collateralized by equipment, guaranteed by majority stockholder, payable in monthly installments of $44,935 including interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 0.75%, due June 2006
  $          —     $ 893,258  
Note payable to bank, collateralized by equipment, guaranteed by majority stockholder, payable in quarterly principal installments of $28,571, with interest payable monthly at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.00%, due July 2006
          198,925  
Note payable to bank, collateralized by equipment, guaranteed by majority stockholder, payable in monthly installments of $45,872, including interest at the banks prime rate plus 1.5%, due May 2005
          223,968  
Note payable to bank, collateralized by equipment, guaranteed by majority stockholder, payable in monthly installments including interest at the banks prime rate plus 0.5%, due March 2007
          1,155,475  
Note payable to bank, collateralized by equipment, guaranteed by majority stockholder, payable in monthly installments of $44,815 including interest at 4.75%, due March 2007
          1,142,523  
Note payable to financial institution, collateralized by a software license, payable in quarterly installments of $30,842, including interest at 5.92%, due August 2005
          89,840  
                 
            3,703,989  
Current maturities
          (2,003,746 )
                 
    $     $ 1,700,243  
                 
 
The Company repaid to the bank the remaining balance of the long term debt principal and related accrued interest during 2005. The Company did not record any gain or loss on the transaction.
 
5.   Operating Lease Obligations
 
The Company leases vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases, which expire through December 2008. Lease terms are generally 24 to 39 months. In management’s opinion, the risk of loss on residual value guarantees is minimal. Total vehicle lease expense paid for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $157,262 and $126,726, respectively.
 
The Company leases office facilities under renewable month-to-month operating leases from limited liability corporations (LLC) owned by the stockholders of the Company. Total rent expense paid to these LLC’s for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $372,130 and $437,210, respectively. The Company also leases temporary office space under month-to-month operating leases from third parties. Total rent expense for the temporary office space for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $118,304 and $96,021, respectively.


F-101


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement — (Continued)
 
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases at December 31, 2005 are as follows:
 
         
2006
  $ 189,549  
2007
    106,356  
2008
    40,166  
2009
    12,335  
2010 and thereafter
     
         
Total minimum lease payments
  $ 348,406  
         
 
6.   Stockholders’ Equity
 
Common Stock
 
Authorized common stock consists of 90,000,000 shares of no par voting stock and 10,000,000 shares of no par nonvoting stock. All shares have equal rights to distributions and have equal rights in the event of dissolution or liquidation. There were 20,836,870 no par voting shares outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
 
Stock Option Plan
 
The Company has adopted an Employee Stock Option Plan (the Plan) under which employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company or an affiliate or subsidiary are eligible for stock options. The Company has reserved 5,300,000 common shares under the Plan. The Plan allows grants of incentive options and nonqualified options to purchase common shares at a price that is not less than the fair market value on the date of grant. The Board of Directors determines the option price. Generally, the options have a 10-year life from the date of grant and vest 20% each year until fully vested.
 
A summary of stock option activity and related information is as follows:
 
                                 
    Shares
    Outstanding Stock Options     Weighted-
 
    Available
    Number of
    Price per
    Average
 
    for Grant     Shares     Share     Exercise Price  
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
    4,725,283       574,717     $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
Granted
                       
Cancelled
    12,238       (12,238 )   $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2004
    4,737,521       562,479     $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
Granted
                       
Cancelled
    19,114       (19,114 )   $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2005
    4,756,635       543,365     $ 0.93     $ 0.93  
                                 
 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2005 and 2004 were 486,496 and 443,501, respectively. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of the options is five years.
 
7.   Related Party Transactions
 
Interest income of $8,952 and $13,304 was received on notes from stockholders and a limited liability corporation owned by the majority stockholder during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,


F-102


Table of Contents

 
Xactware, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement — (Continued)
 
respectively. The Company leases its office facilities from LLCs owned by the stockholders. During 2005, the Company issued two short-term notes receivable to related parties in the amounts of $20,320 and $125,000, respectively.
 
8.   Employee Benefits
 
The Company has a qualified 401(k) profit sharing plan that allows employees to contribute an elected percentage of earnings to the plan. The Company makes a matching contribution of 75% of the contribution up to a maximum of 8% of eligible compensation. Additionally, the Company can make discretionary contributions. Employees are eligible to participate in the plan after three months of service and attainment of age 18.
 
The Company contributed $525,426 and $419,970 to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, the Company also has established a cafeteria benefit plan, which enables employees to choose among certain benefits, and have the benefit amounts paid for with a portion of employee compensation before federal income or social security taxes are withheld.


F-103


Table of Contents

PART II
 
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
 
Item 13.   Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
 
                 
    Amount
       
    to be Paid        
 
Registration fee
  $ 29,475          
FINRA filing fee
  $ 75,500          
Listing fees
    *          
Transfer agent’s fees
    *          
Printing and engraving expenses
    *          
Legal fees and expenses
    *          
Accounting fees and expenses
    *          
Miscellaneous
    *          
                 
Total
  $ *          
                 
 
* To be completed by amendment.
 
Each of the amounts set forth above, other than the Registration fee and the FINRA filing fee, is an estimate.
 
Item 14.    Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
 
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation may indemnify directors and officers as well as other employees and individuals against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with any threatened, pending or completed actions, suits or proceedings in which such person is made a party by reason of such person being or having been a director, officer, employee or agent to the Registrant. The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that Section 145 is not exclusive of other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. Article Twelfth of the Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation provides for indemnification by the Registrant of its directors, officers and employees to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
 
Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits a corporation to provide in its certificate of incorporation that a director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) for unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. The Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation provides for such limitation of liability.
 
The Registrant maintains standard policies of insurance under which coverage is provided (a) to its directors and officers against loss rising from claims made by reason of breach of duty or other wrongful act, and (b) to the Registrant with respect to payments which may be made by the Registrant to such officers and directors pursuant to the above indemnification provision or otherwise as a matter of law.
 
The proposed forms of Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement provide for indemnification of directors and officers of the Registrant by the underwriters against certain liabilities.


II-1


Table of Contents

Item 15.    Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
 
On June 2, 2008 we issued an aggregate of 100 shares of our common stock, par value $.01 per share, to Insurance Services Office, Inc. for $.01 per share. The issuance of such shares was not registered under the Securities Act because the shares were offered and sold in a transaction exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
 
Since August 1, 2005, Insurance Services Office, Inc. has issued to directors, officers and employees options to purchase 184,575 shares of Class A common stock with per share exercise prices ranging from $445 to $862, and has issued 353,054 shares of common stock upon exercise of outstanding options. The issuance of stock options and the common stock issuable upon the exercise of such options to directors, officers and employees were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 701 as promulgated under the Securities Act. The share and per share information in this paragraph does not reflect the stock split the Company will consummate in connection with this offering.
 
Item 16.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
 
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Registration Statement:
 
         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description
 
  1 .1   Form of Underwriting Agreement*
  3 .1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation*
  3 .2   Amended and Restated By-Laws*
  4 .1   Form of Common Stock Certificate*
  5 .1   Opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell*
  10 .1   401(k) Savings Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan**
  10 .2   Verisk Analytics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan*
  10 .3   Form of Letter Agreement
  10 .4   Form of Master License Agreement and Participation Supplement.
  21 .1   Subsidiaries of the Registrant*
  23 .1   Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
  23 .2   Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
  23 .3   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
  23 .4   Consent of Davis Polk & Wardwell (included in Exhibit 5.1)*
  24 .1   Power of Attorney**
 
* To be filed by amendment.
 
** Previously filed
 
(b) The following financial statement schedule is filed as part of this Registration Statement:
 
         
Schedule
   
Number
 
Description
 
  Schedule II     Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
        Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007


II-2


Table of Contents

Item 17.    Undertakings
 
The undersigned hereby undertakes:
 
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
 
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions referenced in Item 14 of this Registration Statement, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered hereunder, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
 
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
 
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.
 
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new Registration Statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


II-3


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Jersey City, State of New Jersey, on the 7th day of October, 2008.
 
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
 
  By: 
/s/  Frank J. Coyne
Name: Frank J. Coyne
  Title:  Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
             
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
         
/s/  Frank J. Coyne

Frank J. Coyne
  Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer)
  October 7, 2008
         
/s/  Mark V. Anquillare

Mark V. Anquillare
  Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
  October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

J. Hyatt Brown
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Glen A. Dell
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Henry J. Feinberg
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Christopher M. Foskett
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Constantine P. Iordanou
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  * 

John F. Lehman, Jr. 
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Stephen W. Lilienthal
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Samuel G. Liss
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Andrew G. Mills
  Director   October 7, 2008


II-4


Table of Contents

             
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
         
/s/  *

Arthur J. Rothkopf
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

Barbara D. Stewart
  Director   October 7, 2008
         
/s/  *

David B. Wright
  Director   October 7, 2008
             
*By:  
/s/  Mark V. Anquillare

Attorney-in-Fact
      October 7, 2008


II-5


Table of Contents

Schedule II
 
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
(In thousands)
 
                                 
    Balance at
    Charged to
             
    Beginning
    Costs and
    Deductions —
    Balance at
 
Description
  of Year     Expenses(1)     Write-offs(2)     End of Year  
 
Year ended December 31, 2005:
                               
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 3,750     $ 1,554     $ (1,681 )   $ 3,623  
                                 
Valuation allowance for income taxes
  $     $ 2,144     $     $ 2,144  
                                 
                                 
Year ended December 31, 2006:
                               
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 3,623     $ 3,069     $ (1,419 )   $ 5,273  
                                 
Valuation allowance for income taxes
  $ 2,144     $     $     $ 2,144  
                                 
                                 
Year ended December 31, 2007:
                               
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 5,273     $ 6,807     $ (3,833 )   $ 8,247  
                                 
Valuation allowance for income taxes
  $ 2,144     $     $ (610 )   $ 1,534  
                                 
 
(1) Primarily additional reserves for bad debts.
 
 
(2) Primarily accounts receivable balances written off, net of recoveries, and the expiration of loss carryforwards.


S-1


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description
 
  1 .1   Form of Underwriting Agreement*
  3 .1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation*
  3 .2   Amended and Restated By-Laws*
  4 .1   Form of Common Stock Certificate*
  5 .1   Opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell*
  10 .1   401(k) Savings Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan**
  10 .2   Verisk Analytics, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan*
  10 .3   Form of Letter Agreement
  10 .4   Form of Master License Agreement and Participation Supplement.
  21 .1   Subsidiaries of the Registrant*
  23 .1   Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
  23 .2   Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
  23 .3   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
  23 .4   Consent of Davis Polk & Wardwell (included in Exhibit 5.1)*
  24 .1   Power of Attorney**
 
* To be filed by amendment.
** Previously Filed.

Exhibit 10.3
____________, 2008
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
     545 Washington Boulevard
     Jersey City, New Jersey
     07310
Ladies and Gentlemen:
     The undersigned understands that Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the several underwriters (the “ Underwriters ”), propose to enter into an Underwriting Agreement (the “ Underwriting Agreement ”) with Verisk Analytics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), providing for the public offering (the “ Initial Public Offering ”) by certain stockholders of the Company, of shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (the “ Common Stock ”).
     To induce the Company and the Underwriters to continue their efforts in connection with the Initial Public Offering, the undersigned hereby agrees that, from the date of the pricing of the Initial Public Offering to the 30-month anniversary date thereof, without the prior written consent of the Board of Directors of the Company, the undersigned will not Transfer any shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned by the undersigned and any purported Transfer of such shares of Common Stock shall be null and void ab initio . The foregoing sentence shall not apply to:
     (a) the Common Stock sold in the Initial Public Offering;
     (b) the sale of Common Stock in a public offering registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission;
     (c) 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned by the undersigned on the 18-month anniversary date of the pricing of the Initial Public Offering; provided that the number of shares of Common Stock sold pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) above will be (i) included in the number of shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned for the purposes of this paragraph (c) and (ii) subtracted from the number of shares of Common Stock that are no longer subject to the restrictions on Transfer pursuant to this paragraph (c);
     (d) Transfers or agreements to Transfer of Common Stock pursuant to a merger, tender offer or other change of control transaction involving the Company and approved or recommended by the Board of Directors of the Company, provided that, in the event that such transaction is not completed, any Common Stock Beneficially Owned by the undersigned will remain subject to the restrictions contained in this agreement;

 


 

     (e) Transfers of shares of Common Stock or other securities acquired in open market transactions after completion of the Initial Public Offering;
     (f) the establishment of a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the Transfer of Common Stock; provided that such plan does not provide for the Transfer of the Common Stock in violation of the other terms of this agreement; and
     (g) Transfers to any spouse, child or charity, or a trust for the benefit of one or more of the undersigned and any spouse, child or charity; provided that the transferee agrees to enter into an agreement on terms substantially similar to those contained herein.
     Capitalized terms used in the paragraphs above and not otherwise defined shall have their respective meanings as defined below:
     “Beneficially Own” has the meaning assigned to such term in Rule 13d-3 and Rule 13d-5 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (or any successor rules), except that in calculating the beneficial ownership of the undersigned, the undersigned will be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all securities that the undersigned has the right to acquire by conversion or exercise of other securities, whether such right is currently exercisable or is exercisable only upon the passage of time or the occurrence of a subsequent condition; provided that any Common Stock Beneficially Owned pursuant to paragraph (f) above will not be included in this definition of Beneficially Own. The terms “Beneficially Owns,” “Beneficial Ownership” and “Beneficially Owned” have a corresponding meaning.
     “Transfer” means any issuance, sale, transfer, gift, assignment, distribution, devise or other disposition, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, as well as any other event that causes any person to acquire Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock or the right to vote Common Stock, or any agreement to take any such actions or cause any such events, including (a) any offer, pledge, sale, contract to sell, the sale of any option or contract to purchase, the purchase of any option or contract to sell, the grant of any option, right or warrant to purchase, loan, or any other transfer or disposition of, directly or indirectly, any shares of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Common Stock, (b) entering into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the Common Stock, whether any such transaction is described in clause (a) or (b) above or is to be settled by delivery of Common Stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise and (c) transfers of interests in other entities that result in changes in Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock, in each case, whether voluntary or involuntary, whether owned of record, or Beneficially Owned and whether by merger, operation of law or otherwise. The terms “Transferring,” “Transferred,” “Transferee” and “Transferor” shall have the correlative meanings.

2


 

     If the undersigned dies or becomes Disabled, the undersigned will be released from the obligations under this agreement, and this agreement shall be void and of no further effect. For the purposes of this paragraph, “Disabled” means that the undersigned is prevented, by illness, accident, disability or any other medically determinable physical or mental condition, from substantially performing the undersigned’s duties and responsibilities for one (1) or more periods totaling ninety (90) days in any twelve (12)-month period, as determined by the Board of Directors in their sole discretion.
     The undersigned also agrees and consents to the entry of stop transfer instructions with the Company’s transfer agent and registrar against the transfer of the undersigned’s shares of Common Stock except in compliance with the foregoing restrictions.
     Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (i) the Company and the Underwriters have not entered into the Underwriting Agreement on or before June 30, 2009, (ii) the Underwriting Agreement shall terminate or be terminated prior to payment for and delivery of the Class A Common Stock, or (iii) the undersigned has attained the age of 70 years, the undersigned will be released from the obligations under this agreement, and this agreement shall be void and of no further effect.
     Any amendment of this agreement requires the written consent of the Company with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company.
     The undersigned understands that the Company and the Underwriters are relying upon this agreement in proceeding toward consummation of the Public Offering. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing, however, shall not modify, limit or supersede any arrangement, agreement or understanding entered into between the undersigned and any of the Underwriters in connection with the Initial Public Offering. The undersigned further understands that this agreement is irrevocable and shall be binding upon the undersigned’s heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.
     Whether or not the Initial Public Offering actually occurs depends on a number of factors, including market conditions. Any Initial Public Offering will only be made pursuant to an Underwriting Agreement, the terms of which are subject to negotiation between the Company and the Underwriters.
     
 
  Very truly yours,
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
(Name)
 
   
 
 
 
(Address)

3

Exhibit 10.4
ISO MASTER AGREEMENT — PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURER
January 2005 Edition
Agreement made this       day of                 , 200    between Insurance Services Office, Inc., with offices at 545 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310-1686 on behalf of itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates (“ISO” ® ) and                 having offices at                 and all its affiliates and subsidiaries that provide property/casualty insurance, unless excluded on an attached Schedule A (collectively referred to herein as “Licensee”).
In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS:
a. “Agreement” means this agreement and all Exhibits, Annex(es) and Supplement(s).
b. “Confidential Information” means any non-public information of either party including but not limited to, agenda and minutes of ISO panels.
c. “Product” or “Products” means any and all works, materials, and data, distributed by ISO or by a third party licensor of ISO, in any form, format or media (including but not limited to paper, electronic media and all forms of electronic delivery) including but not limited to manuals, forms and endorsements, circulars, actuarial studies, loss costs, statistical plans, database outputs, data compilations and software, and their derivatives that are proprietary to and/or copyrighted or copyrightable by ISO or proprietary to and/or copyrighted or copyrightable by a third party licensor of ISO and lawfully licensed to ISO for distribution by ISO and are applicable to the services and jurisdictions for the lines of insurance or subdivisions thereof, as indicated in the Supplements.
d. “Supplements” means the Participation Supplement for each line of insurance (the “Participation Supplements”) and all Product Supplements attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference herein.
e. “Territory” The states, jurisdictions or territories of the United States of America, as licensed herein.
2.  PARTICIPATION :
a. To the extent indicated by Licensee on any Participation Supplement, Licensee agrees to participate with ISO as defined in ISO’s Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws and as set out in the Participation Supplements. Licensee agrees to abide by any rules or procedures duly adopted by the Board of Directors of ISO as they apply to ISO participation and this Agreement. Licensee will be promptly notified of and provided with any modifications or updates to said rules or procedures. Licensee acknowledges that it is not required to license or use any Product filed or issued by ISO, except as may be required by law or regulation, and Licensee shall not state or in any way suggest or represent to any entity that it is or has been required to do so.
b. By selecting participation for Statistical Agent Service in the Participation Supplement, Licensee agrees to report its statistical data to ISO in accordance with ISO’s applicable statistical plans, calls for statistics and related requirements. Licensee agrees that ISO has the right to use said data in developing loss costs and other products, provided that such use does not reveal Licensee’s individual information.
3.  LICENSE :
Provided that Licensee:
a. has completed the appropriate Participation Supplement(s) and/or all applicable Product Supplement(s); and
b. continues to abide by the terms of this Agreement and the Supplements for the services, Territory and lines of insurance, or subdivisions thereof, pertaining to the Products licensed hereunder;
ISO grants to Licensee a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use in the Territory the Products which are obtained directly from ISO, or from a third party licensed by ISO to distribute them to Licensee, solely for Licensee’s property/casualty insurance or reinsurance business. Licensee may copy or reproduce the Product(s) at its premises as permitted in Section 6 below, but may not use a third party to do so unless that third party is licensed by ISO to supply the Product(s) and Licensee has confirmed with ISO that the third party is, in fact, licensed to do so. Except as may be permitted under Sections 5. and 6. of this Agreement or under any Supplement to this Agreement, Licensee agrees to restrict access to all Products only to those employees of Licensee who have a need to use them solely for purposes of Licensee’s property/casualty insurance or reinsurance business (“authorized employees”). Access to some Products may be limited to certain employees or other authorized users as identified on the Product Supplement. Except as may be specifically permitted herein, neither Licensee, nor its employees, nor any users authorized by the Supplements, shall sell, transfer, distribute, publish, disclose, display or otherwise make the Product(s) or any of the information therein available, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity, without the express written consent of ISO.

 


 

For the sole purpose of verifying Licensee’s compliance with this Agreement, ISO may require, on at least ten (10) days prior notice, an examination and copying of any and all information, books of account, records, documents, operations and other materials under the control of the Licensee, and other related entities, which contain records of Licensee’s use of the Products in accordance with this Agreement. All such documents shall be kept available by Licensee for at least three (3) years after the period to which they relate. ISO may exercise this right once in any twelve (12) month period. The audit will be conducted by ISO or its authorized representatives.
In the event Licensee fails to satisfy any of the conditions specified above, ISO may immediately cease providing Products to Licensee and may terminate access to the Products and thereafter notify Licensee of same.
4. TERM AND TERMINATION:
This Agreement is effective on the date specified above and shall remain in force until terminated.
a. ISO may terminate this Agreement and/or any Supplement(s) as follows:
(1) if Licensee materially violates any term or condition of this Agreement or any Supplement(s) and fails to cure said violation within thirty (30) days following receipt of notice thereof from ISO. In such event, ISO may cease providing the Product(s) to Licensee unless and until Licensee cures said breach; or
(2) if Licensee defaults in the payment of any fee(s) due under this license with ten (10) days prior notice ; or
(3) if ISO makes a business decision to discontinue any Product(s) and/or the maintenance and support of any Product(s) licensed hereunder, provided, however, that ISO shall provide Licensee with at least ninety (90) days notice of any such discontinuance, and Licensee may continue to use the discontinued Product subject to the provisions of section 4.e. below; or
(4) if ISO makes a business decision to discontinue participation for any line of insurance, or subdivision thereof, Territory or service, provided, however, that ISO shall provide Licensee with at least one hundred eighty (180) days notice of any such discontinuance; or
(5) upon the effective date of legislation, regulation or judicial ruling or decision requiring ISO to discontinue participation for any line of insurance, or subdivision thereof, Territory or service, or discontinue providing any Product(s); or
(6)immediately if Licensee (i) terminates or suspends its business; (ii) becomes subject to any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding under federal or state law; or (iii) becomes insolvent or becomes subject to direct control by a trustee, receiver or similar authority; or
(7) for any other reason, upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice to Licensee.
b.   Licensee may terminate any Participation Supplement, or portion thereof, effective at the end of a calendar quarter by providing ISO with sixty (60) days written notice prior to end of the quarter.
 
c.   Licensee may terminate this agreement and any Product Supplement, or portion thereof:
(1) if ISO terminates or suspends its business; or
(2) if ISO becomes subject to any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding under federal or state law; or
(3) if ISO becomes insolvent or becomes subject to direct control by a trustee, receiver or similar authority; or
(4) for any other reason, upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice to ISO.
d. In the event of termination including expiration of this Agreement or any Supplements, ISO shall have the right to cease providing Products to Licensee and terminate Licensee’s access to Product(s), and Licensee shall immediately discontinue use of the Products, and at ISO’s option:
(1) return to ISO all applicable Products provided, including all manuals, associated documentation and any copies thereof; or
(2) destroy the applicable Products, including all manuals, associated documentation and any copies thereof; and
(3) certify in writing signed by an officer of Licensee that they have been so returned or destroyed.
e. ISO may, in certain circumstances and at its sole discretion, decide to permit Licensee to continue to use a Product during a transition period (specified below) after the termination of this Agreement in its entirety or a termination of that portion of this Agreement applicable to that Product. If Licensee requests such permission, and ISO agrees, then Licensee must:

2


 

(1) execute an ISO Transitional License; and
(2) pay all Transition License fees.
Licensee acknowledges and understands that during the transition period, which shall not exceed three (3) years, Licensee shall not be licensed to use any update to any terminated Product(s) nor shall Licensee receive any maintenance or other services related to the terminated Product(s). If Licensee executes a Transitional License, and pays the appropriate fees, Licensee shall not be required to return or destroy the Product(s), as required under section 4.d., until the expiration or termination of the Transition License.
f. Termination under this Section 4. shall not relieve Licensee of its obligations to ISO regarding participation for the period during which such participation existed or regarding property or copyright as specified in Sections 2., 9. and 10. In the event of termination as a result of Licensee’s breach of its obligations under this Agreement, Licensee shall continue to be obligated for any payments due up to the effective date of termination.
g. If the license to use any Product provided to Licensee electronically is terminated by ISO under Section 4.a.(1) or (2) or is terminated by Licensee, Licensee will be liable and charged for payment of all applicable termination charges related thereto.
h. Termination of this Agreement and/or any Supplement(s) shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedies available to ISO.
5.  RESTRICTION AGAINST TRANSFER OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION : Licensee shall not disclose or release any ISO Confidential Information which is disclosed to Licensee either (i) in a writing or other tangible form or (ii) orally, to any third party except with ISO’s prior written consent, unless compelled to do so by legal process. In such case, Licensee shall give ISO reasonable and sufficient notice to allow ISO to take action to protect its confidential information and trade secrets. Licensee shall treat ISO Confidential Information in the same manner and with the same protections and safeguards as Licensee protects and safeguards its own confidential information and trade secrets.
a.   ISO agrees that statistical information provided by Licensee shall be considered Licensee’s confidential information, and ISO shall not release any such information to any third party without Licensee’s prior written consent, except to appropriate insurance regulators as part of provision of statistical services (if such services are requested by Licensee), unless compelled to do so by legal process.
b.   ISO and Licensee acknowledge that much, if not all, of the material and information which has or will come into their possession from the other party pursuant to this Agreement consists of confidential and proprietary information, nonpublic personal information or software of the disclosing party and its affiliates, agents, Licensees or third parties (“Confidential Information”). The party receiving such Confidential Information agrees to hold it in strictest confidence and agrees not to release or disclose such Confidential Information to any individual or entity, whether employee, subcontractor, or subcontractor employee, except that the receiving party may disclose such information to its employees who are necessarily involved in the performance of the recipient’s obligations hereunder and have agreed in writing to keep the information confidential to protect the disclosing party’s interests.
c.   The party receiving Confidential Information further agrees not to (i) use the Confidential Information for its own benefit or for the benefit of any third parties, other than for the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, and (ii) release or disclose the Confidential Information to any other entity, either during the term or after the termination of this Agreement. In the event of any breach of this confidentiality obligation or of the obligations relative to the rights to products and services pursuant to this Agreement, or any product developed or delivered in providing Services, the party receiving the Confidential Information acknowledges that the disclosing party may have no adequate remedy at law, since the harm caused by such a breach could not be easily measured and compensated for in the form of damages.
d.   The party receiving the Confidential Information shall be solely responsible for maintaining the security of such Confidential Information and for complying with all federal, state, provincial and local laws, regulations, or other requirements including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, 15 U.S.C., Section 6801, as amended from time to time governing the privacy, confidentiality and non-disclosure of such information.
e.   The foregoing obligations shall not apply to any information which: a) is or becomes known publicly through no fault of the receiving party; or b) is acquired or learned by the receiving party from a third party entitled to disclose it; or c) is already known to the receiving party before receipt from the disclosing party as shown by the receiving party’s written records; or d) is independently developed by the receiving party, as shown by the receiving party’s written records; or e) must be disclosed by operation of law.
f.   The foregoing obligations of each party shall survive the termination or expiration of this agreement.
6.  RESTRICTION AGAINST COPYING OR REDISTRIBUTING THE PRODUCT(S): Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Product(s) licensed hereunder may not be copied, reproduced, redistributed, sold, filed or used in any manner, without the written permission of ISO or, if the Product or the portion thereof to be copied, distributed or used is proprietary to a third party, the permission of that third party. Licensee must receive ISO’s written permission prior to making a Product(s) available in electronic

3


 

format including but not limited to via the Internet, extranet, local area network, wide area network or similar technology and Licensee agrees to pay any associated fees .
Subject to the above and any additional limitations identified below or in the Supplement(s), permission is hereby granted to reproduce and redistribute copies and extracts of the Products and the information therein:
a. in any format, to Licensee’s authorized employees;
b. in paper format only to Licensee’s insurance agents and insureds, solely for use in conjunction with specific policies quoted and/or underwritten by Licensee;
c. in paper format only, to attorneys, independent claims adjusters, loss control consultants and premium auditors, solely for use in conjunction with work being performed on Licensee’s behalf;
d. to all other consultants, vendors and other third parties, so long as the consultants, vendors and third parties are licensed by ISO to use the Product solely to provide a product or service to Licensee;
e. in any format, for the sole purpose of making a filing with insurance regulators, and related regulatory matters.
Licensee agrees to comply with ISO’s security requirements associated with such availability of Products. Licensee also agrees to reproduce ISO’s copyright notice, or any applicable third party’s copyright notice, in any permitted copies, modifications or partial copies of the
Product(s) that Licensee makes.
To the extent Licensee wishes to distribute the Product(s), in whole or in part to any entity not specifically listed in sections 6.a. through 6.e. above, Licensee must receive ISO’s prior written permission. ISO may require Licensee to comply with specific security requirements and/or pay additional fees as a condition of such permission.
Licensee agrees that, to the extent it modifies any Product(s), it is solely responsible for ensuring that, if required, the modified Product(s) is approved by applicable insurance regulators for Licensee’s use. Licensee further acknowledges that ISO is not required to provide services or assistance with respect to modified Products, and that, if ISO agrees to provide such services or assistance, Licensee may be required to pay consulting fees to ISO.
7. FEES:
Licensee agrees to pay ISO the following fees:
a. Participation Service Fees: Licensee agrees to pay ISO all fees invoiced for participation with ISO, applicable to the services, Territories and lines of insurance or subdivisions thereof for which Licensee’s ISO participation applies, as indicated in the Participation Supplement(s), according to the policies and procedures set forth in the then-current edition of ISO’s “Participation Billing” booklet.
b. Product Fees: Licensee agrees to pay ISO all fees invoiced for Products within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice. Fees are nonrefundable unless otherwise indicated in writing. The fee for the initial term for each Product licensed after the effective date of this Agreement is indicated on the applicable Product Supplement. ISO reserves the right to amend the fees due on prior notice to Licensee. Licensee shall have thirty (30) days from the date of any renewal notice or notice of a change in fees to advise ISO in writing of its intent to make adjustments in its order for the Product(s).
Licensee shall be responsible for payment of fees for all participation services and Products licensed, regardless of whether Licensee actually uses any or all such Products or services. ISO reserves the right to amend the fees due on prior notice to Licensee. Except for taxes based on ISO’s income, Licensee shall be responsible for payment to ISO of all federal, state and local sales, excise, use or similar taxes in connection with Licensee’s licensing or use of the Product(s) licensed hereunder. Licensee shall pay ISO interest on all charges not paid within thirty (30) days at the rate of one percent (1%) per month or the maximum interest permitted by law, whichever is less.
If ISO terminates the Agreement, in whole or part, pursuant to Sections 4.a. (1) or (2) above, ISO will reinstate distribution of and/or access to Product(s) only after Licensee pays all outstanding charges, including any interest and administrative costs that ISO may impose, and all charges incurred by ISO in disconnecting and reconnecting Licensee access to the Product(s), if applicable.
c. For any Product(s) which will be provided to Licensee electronically, Licensee, at Licensee’s expense must: (i) provide all necessary Licensee equipment and appropriate interfacing devices; and (ii) pay for all costs to connect to an ISO-provided connect point or designated node, if necessary.
8. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS:
a. Licensee agrees to comply with the following security requirements for any Products licensed hereunder.

4


 

b. Licensee agrees that it will not attempt to circumvent any security measures contained within or associated with any Product licensed hereunder. Licensee shall not attempt to decompile, reverse engineer, or otherwise disassemble or obtain the source code of any Product provided hereunder.
c. To the extent a Product licensed hereunder is accessed electronically Third-party software, sometimes called “spyware”, can infect a user’s computer and capture data without permission. ISO is not responsible if any confidential data of Licensee or its agents is compromised in this manner. In order to protect its own data, ISO reserves the right, without prior notice, to suspend access to any ISO web application by any user or agent whose computer is infected in this manner until the infection is removed. ISO will make reasonable efforts to notify the Licensee beforehand, but circumstances may require prompt action.
d. Passwords. For those Products designated on the Supplement(s) as requiring a password, ISO will assign unique sign-on IDs and passwords, and Licensee and its employees shall only access the Product(s) through use of the assigned sign-on IDs and passwords, which must be kept confidential. Each ID will be for the personal use of a single employee only. Licensee shall not distribute or divulge a valid sign-on ID and/or password to anyone except to its employees, unless otherwise permitted in the Supplement(s) or in a separate writing by ISO. Licensee is responsible for all charges as described in the Supplement(s) as they relate to the use and activity charged to Licensee’s sign-on IDs. ISO retains the right to change any sign-on ID and/or password at its discretion and notify Licensee sufficiently in advance so as not to interfere with Licensee’s authorized continuous use of the Product(s). ISO also agrees to promptly change the password upon Licensee’s request. Access to products which require a password must be discontinued simultaneously: (i) for any employee, with the end of that employee’s employment with Licensee; and (ii) for any other user authorized by the Supplement(s), or otherwise authorized by ISO in writing, with the end of that user’s relationship with Licensee. Licensee shall be liable, and indemnify ISO, for all fees and all loss or damage caused by or resulting from the continued use of Licensee sign-on ID(s) and password(s) by terminated employees or unauthorized users.
9.  ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ISO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY : Licensee acknowledges that ISO claims ownership of and a copyright in the Products and shall not contest or dispute, and waives any defense concerning, any valid ownership or copyright claim made by ISO in the Products. ISO is the owner or authorized licensee of all proprietary information contained in the Products and has the right to grant Licensee the license to use the Products in accordance with this Agreement without violating any law, rule or regulation. Licensee agrees not to take any action that would in any way impair, jeopardize, be inconsistent with, or violate ISO’s ownership of the Product(s) or any valid ISO copyright. ISO’s claims of copyright relate to all Products provided to Licensee pursuant to this Agreement, unless it is stated in the Supplement(s), or on the Product itself, that a Product is copyrighted by or proprietary to a third party. All applicable rights to patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets in the Products, and any modifications made to the Products, and in the information therein, shall remain in ISO or the applicable third party. Licensee agrees that such third parties are third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement and are entitled to enforce their rights hereunder against Licensee. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as granting to Licensee any right, title or interest in or to any patent, trademark, copyright or other right of ISO or the applicable third party. Licensee warrants and represents that it will take all reasonable steps necessary to protect and preserve the Product(s) and the interests and rights of ISO and any applicable third parties therein, including appropriate action by instruction or agreement with its employees or other authorized users permitted access to the Products.
10. REQUIRED COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
a. If Product(s) are reprinted, copied or otherwise used in full, copies must reflect the copyright notice actually shown on the Product(s).
b. If Product(s) are reprinted, copied or otherwise used in part, the following legend must appear at the bottom of each page so used:
“Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.” If the material to be reprinted, copied or otherwise used is copyrighted by a third party, Licensee must obtain permission of the copyright owner to so use the material, and abide by any requirements set forth by the third party.
11.  LIMITATION ON WARRANTIES; NO LIABILITIES : OTHER THAN THOSE REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH HEREIN, ISO MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, COVENANTS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF CONDITION, QUALITY, DURABILITY, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR IN RESPECT OF ANY WARRANTY ARISING BY STATUTE OR OTHERWISE IN LAW OR FROM A COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. IF THE FOREGOING LIMITATION IS HELD TO BE UNENFORCEABLE, ISO’S LIABILITY SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID TO ISO FOR THE LICENSE TO USE THE PRODUCT DURING THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THE RESPECTIVE EVENT(S) GIVING RISE TO SUCH LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION, AND SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY PARTICIPATION FEES PAID TO ISO. FOR ALL PRODUCTS WHERE LICENSEE PAYS FOR THE PRODUCT ON A TRANSACTION BASIS, ISO’S LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THE SPECIFIC TRANSACTION GIVING RISE TO SUCH LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION. THE INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCT(S) MAY BE STATISTICAL SAMPLES AND/OR ACTUARIAL CALCULATIONS, AND ISO MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR

5


 

REPRESENTATIONS, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, THAT THE PRODUCTS WILL ACCURATELY REFLECT, PREDICT OR RESEMBLE EXPERIENCE FOR THE ENTIRE INSURANCE INDUSTRY OR ANY INSURER(S). ALL ISO SERVICES AND PRODUCTS ARE ADVISORY AND ARE PROVIDED AS IS. ISO DOES NOT WARRANT THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY OR CURRENCY OF THE PRODUCT OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN. ISO SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR CONCLUSIONS THAT MAY BE REACHED BY THE LICENSEE.
Except as provided herein, neither ISO, its directors, officers, employees, agents, or participants shall be liable to Licensee, nor to anyone else, for any loss or damage of any kind and however caused, including without limitation, any special, incidental, indirect, consequential or exemplary damages, losses or expenses, including, without limitation, lost profits, failure to realize expected savings or any other commercial or economic loss of any kind resulting from Licensee’s use of the Product(s). Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold ISO harmless from and against any loss, damage, claim, suit or expense, including reasonable attorney’s fees, arising out of or relating to the improper use of the Product(s) by Licensee. With respect to Product(s) provided to Licensee electronically, ISO does not warrant that access will be available during all scheduled hours of operation. ISO represents it will use best efforts to correct any ISO system malfunction causing any unavailability in a timely manner. Oral statements do not constitute warranties, shall not be relied upon by Licensee, and are not part of this Agreement.
12.  INDEMNIFICATION BY ISO: Licensee shall notify ISO promptly of any claim that any Product, or Licensee’s use of any Product, is improper or illegal or violates the rights of any third party. ISO agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Licensee harmless from and against any loss, cost, expense, damage or liability resulting from any claim or suit brought against Licensee based on an allegation that a Product, when properly used as permitted herein, infringes any United States copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right, provided that Licensee, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of notice of any such alleged infringement, notifies ISO of such allegation in writing. ISO shall have the sole right to conduct the defense of any such claim or suit and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise, unless otherwise mutually agreed to in writing by the parties hereto. In the event that Licensee’s use of any Product is held to constitute an infringement and use of that Product is permanently enjoined, ISO shall, at its option and expense, either:
a. procure for Licensee the right to continue using such Product; or
b. modify such Product to become non-infringing; or
c. replace such Product with an equally suitable, compatible and functionally equivalent non-infringing product; or if the foregoing is unavailable
d. grant Licensee a pro-rata refund of the charges paid for such Product provided that prior to paying such refund Licensee returns such Product and all copies and partial copies thereof to ISO.
Should Licensee learn of the infringement of any Product(s) licensed under this Agreement, Licensee shall promptly advise ISO in writing, providing ISO with any available evidence of infringement. In any such infringement suit as ISO may determine to institute to enforce its intellectual property rights, Licensee shall, at the request and expense of ISO, cooperate with ISO in all reasonable respects, including having its employees with relevant information provide such information to ISO and testify when requested by ISO and make available to ISO any relevant records, papers, information and the like.
13.  PROPER NOTICE: Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, all notices, directions, instructions, orders, requests, demands, acknowledgments and other communications required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing, addressed to the parties at their respective addresses set forth at the beginning of this Agreement or to such other addresses as one party may furnish in writing to the other, and shall be deemed properly given or made when:
a. delivered personally;
b. made or given by prepaid telex, telegraph, facsimile or telecopy; or
c. received by first class mail, postage prepaid, or upon the expiration of three (3) days after any such notice, direction, instruction, order, request, demand, acknowledgment or other communication is deposited in the United States mail for transmission by first class mail, postage prepaid, whichever shall occur first.
14.  SURVIVAL OF TERMS: The terms and conditions of Sections 4 through 7 and 9 through 16 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
15.  CHOICE OF LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AND VENUE FOR ADJUDICATING ANY DISPUTE : This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York as an agreement made and wholly performed therein. Any litigation, action, or proceeding arising out of any dispute concerning or otherwise attempting to enforce, interpret, or remedy any breach of this Agreement shall be brought only in a court of competent jurisdiction (whether federal or state) sitting within the State and County of New York. The parties irrevocably and unconditionally (a) submit to personal jurisdiction in the State of New York and

6


 

consent to venue in the County of New York with respect to any such action, (b) waive any objection to the jurisdiction and venue in the State and County of New York, and (c) agree not to plead or claim in any such court that any such suit, action or proceeding has been brought in an inconvenient forum.
16.  COUNTERPARTS . This Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts, each such counterpart being deemed to be an original instrument, and all such counterparts shall together constitute the same agreement.
17.  GENERAL : This Agreement, and the Annexes and Supplement(s), contains the entire agreement of the parties, shall prevail over and supersedes all previous written and oral agreements or terms and conditions of any purchase order, acknowledgement form, or other instrument, or any promotional, marketing, or advertising materials (including without limitation any memorandums of understanding and written proposals) with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement, and the Annexes and Supplements, may be changed or modified only in a writing signed by both parties. If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid under any applicable statute or rule of law, it is, to the extent invalid, deemed to be omitted and the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The failure or delay of either party to insist upon the performance of any of the terms of this Agreement in any one or more instances will not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the future performance of any such term, and the obligation of the parties with respect to any such future performance will continue in full force and effect. This Agreement inures to the benefit of and is binding upon the successors and assigns of ISO and may be assigned by ISO to any of its subsidiaries, affiliates, or related companies. It likewise inures to the benefit of Licensee, but no interest herein shall be transferred or assigned in any manner by Licensee.
This contract is not valid against ISO unless and until executed by the appropriate ISO officer or authorized representative at the appropriate ISO home office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by their authorized representatives as of the day and year first written above.
           
 
           
 
  INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
on behalf of itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates (Licensee) on behalf of itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates (ISO)
 
           
Signed:
 
  Signed:
 
 
           
Name:
 
  Name:
 
 
           
Title:
 
  Title:
 
 
           
Date:
 
  Date:
 
January 2005 Master Agreement — Property Casualty Insurers.doc

7


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement
Line of Insurance Original or Revision Orginal Participation for This Line of insurance
Deletion Revised Participation (or this Line of Insurance COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE code 50 orDeletlon Delellonollhls Une 0 ,^^ Rutes Forms Effective Date
MonthDayYear            I \ Type of            State Filing \ Participation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ |cmcM|i»r«nm
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54
Arizona 02 i Arkansas 03
California 04
Colorado            OS ___ i n Connecticut 06 ‘ 7
Delaware 07 S Dist. of Col. 08 g Flolida 09 7 » Georgia 10 § Idaho 11 § Illinois 12
Indiana 13 | Iowa 14 & Kansas 15 7
Kentucky 16 s Louisiana 17 § Maine 1 8 1
Maryland 19 o Michigan 21 ^ Minnesota 22 s Mississippi 23 3
Missouri 24 1
Montana 25 i Nebraska 26 1
Nevada 27 mm s New Hampshire 28
New Jersey 29
New Mexico 30
New York’ 31
North Carolina” 32 North Dakota 33
Ohio 34
Oklahoma 35
Oregon 38
Pennsylvania 37
Puerto Rico 58
Rhode Island 38
South Carolina 39
South Dakota 40
Tennessee 41
Texas 42 mm t Utah 43
Vermont 44
Virginia 45
Washington 46
West Virginia 47
Wisconsin 48
_ Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 60 Guam 61
Please complete a separate form lor Texas Statistical Agent Service. FA lor New York rules Is applicable to classlllcation and territories only.
Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law.
Rating Information Services correspond to loss/cost and rules services.

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement
Revised Participation (or this Line of Insurance COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE code 010
PBRSOlSrAL AUTOMOBILE I n I | or Deletion Revised Participation lor this Line of Insurance
(L T AT3TT PTTV jfco T3TTVQTnAT T» A TUT AntT\w 1 U            WCKUIUH (. L ilAPJLUJJ. I PC Jrxl I BIOJiJ-i lJ.flJVLeHj.CiJ CODEI            I            II O Deletion ol this Una of Insurance r~~| I r~| I r~~| ILine Services Rules Forms Effective Date            I            I            I I            II            I            i—i             i—i
Month            Day            Year            I | | .................................... |
~S.CONT\Typeof \ State \ Filing \ \\ <j> \ \ Participation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ \ \ \ \ MiaeM P i,r il.lal .. \ ........................... \ \ % \ \
\v\M
\ \A\v\
Alaska 54 u            u            U Arizona 02 :* 4 Arkansas 03 mm 8’ V California 04 mm ^ a 1 $ mm Colorado            OS 1 mm & Connecticut 08 « w            x Delaware 07 i 1
Dist. ol Col. 08 § Florida 09 mm d- 1 IT Georgia 1 0 I § % D) Idaho 11 8
Illinois 12 mm § i Indiana 13 <? g 5
Iowa 14 a            a            g. Kansas 15 sr 7
Kentucky 16 I 1 1.
Louisiana 17 0 0 S Maine 18 I « $ Maryland 19 5 n            o Michigan 21 o- Minnesota 22 1 s 8
Mississippi 23 0 s 0
Missouri 24 p % Montana 25 §: 3; Nebraska 28 a            f 1
Nevada 27 s 3 ? New Hampshire 28
New Jersey 29
New Mexico 30 .
New York 31
North Dakota 33
Ohio 34
Oklahoma 35
Oregon 36
Pennsylvania 37
Puerto Rico 58
Rhode Island 38
South Carolina 39
South Dakota 40
Tennessee 41
Texas 42 mm            mm Utah 43
Vermont 44
Virginia 45
Washington 46
West Virginia 47
Wisconsin 48
Wyoming 49 ___ Virgin Islands 60 mm            mm ... Guam 61 ^M I            I mm i mm

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement
Revised Participation (or this Line of Insurance COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE code 060
r\ & r\ nr DalAttnn Q Revised Participation (or this Une of Insurance
BOILER & MACHINERY ^ |0|6|0| orPeletlon dd^o..^^..^ I            I            I I            I            I I            I            I           &nb sp;Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date            I            I            I I            I            I I            I          ;   I            j—1 i—i
TVp«of ^ State \ Filing            V\\ \ Participation \ Services \ Authorization \\\ \ |oh^Xlp«ftl.li| \ ..... \\\
___ 01 02 03 04 05 V 06 ] 07 ~ OB 09 Month            Day            Year | ............... | | ............... | | | | | | | Alabama 01 I            I Alaska 54 1 Arizona 02 Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Olst. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10
Idaho 1 1
Illinois 12
Indiana 13
Iowa 1 4 1
Kansas 15
Kentucky 16
Louisiana 1 7 Maine 18
Maryland 19
Massachusetts 20
Michigan 21
Minnesota 22
Mississippi 23
Missouri 24
Montana 25
Nebraska 26 — Nevada 27
New Hampshire 28
New Jersey 29 1
New Mexico 30
New York’ 31
North Carolina 32
North Dakota 33
Ohio 34
Oklahoma 35 1
Oregon 36 H= Pennsylvania 37
Puerto Rico 58
Rhode Island 38 |
South Carolina 39
South Dakota 40 1
Tennessee 41 M M n:
Texas 42
Uteh 43
Vermont 44
Virginia 45
Washington 48
West Virginia 47
Wisconsin 48 Hi Wyomins 49 Virgin Islands 50
Guam 51
Please complele a separate lorm lor Texas Statistical Agent Service. ‘FA lor New York rules is applicable to classification and territories only.
Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law.
Rating information Services correspond to loss/cost and rules services.

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original or Revision nominalP«rttfPa*>nlorihlsUneolInsurance RnqrKn?qc?nWm?Rq            I Si 9 I 0|orDetetion q Revl S «JParticip a U 0 n. 0 rW 8 Un e o)Insurance BUblJMi!ibbUWIOiK8CODE            I            I            I W I            Q Defc^n of thte Urwol Insurance I            I            I I            I            I I            I            ILine Services Rules Forms Effective Date            I            II I            I            I I            I            I        &nbs p;   i—i            i—i
Month            Day            Year            I | | ................................ |
~S.CONT \TVp*of\State\ Filing^^\ Participation\ Services \ Authorization \\\ (cMcmpWtf.it)\ ‘\\\\
01 02 03 04 05 OS 07 08 ................................................ 09
Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02
Arkansas 03 California 04
Colorado 05
Connecticut 06
Delaware 07
Dlst. 01 Col. 08
Florida 09
Georgia 1 0 Hawaii 52
Idaho 11
Illinois 12
Indiana 13
Iowa 14
Kansas 15
Kentucky 1 8 Louisiana 17
Maine 18
Maryland 19
Massachusetts 20
Michigan 21
Minnesota 22
Mississippi 23
Missouri 24
Montana 25
Nebraska 28
Nevada 27
New Hampshire 28
New Jersey 29
New Mexico 30
New York’ 31
North Carolina 32
North Dakota 33
Ohio 34
Oklahoma 35
Oregon 38
Pennsylvania 37
Puerto Rico 58
Rhode Island 38
South Carolina 39
South Dakota 40
Tennessee 41
Texas 42
Utah 43
Vermont 44
Virginia 45
Washington 46
West Virginia 47
Wisconsin 48 till
Wyomlnfl 49 mmM
Virgin Islands 60
Guam 81

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement
Revised Participation (or this Line of Insurance COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE code 290 ILine Services Rules Forms Effective Date
Month            Day            Year            I | | ................. |
~S.CONT \ Type of\ State \ Filing \ \ Participation \ Services \ Authorization \ la»oHu.r«UI«| .. \ \ .......
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 | OB | O9 | Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawaii 52 Idaho 1 1 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 1 4 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 1 7 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 26 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York’ 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsylvania 37 Puerto Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 48 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48
Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50
Guam 61
Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law.
·FA for New York rules Is applicable to and territories only.

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Agreement Supplement
Line of Insurance COMMERCIAL PACKAGE POLICY CODE 360 Original Or Revision °“Orginal l Participation lor this Line of Insurance or Deletion            Revlsed Participation for this Line of Insurance Deletion of this Line of Insurance
Effective Date            Line Services            Rules Forms
Month            Dey            Year
\ Participation \ State Sen/Ices \ \ Filing \ \ Authorization \ \ \ (check 1 per ) \
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 | OB | O9 | Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawaii 52 Idaho 1 1 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 1 4 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 1 7 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 26 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York’ 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsylvania 37 Puerto Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 48 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48
Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50
Guam 51
Please complete a separate form for Texas Statistical Agent Service.
Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law.
·FA for New York rules is applicable to classification and territories only.
Participation Agreement Supplement
Line of Insurance COMMERCIAL PACKAGE POLICY CODE 360 Original Or Revision °“Orginal l Participation lor this Line of Insurance or Deletion            Revlsed Participation for this Line of Insurance Deletion of this Line of Insurance

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Original Or Revision            Original Participation for this Line of Insurance Or Deletion Line of Insurance            Revlsed Participation lor this Une of CRIME & FIDELITY            CODE            Insurance O Deletion of this Line of Insurance 0 7 0
Effective Date            Line Services            Rules Forms
Monih            Day            Year
articipation            State \ Filing \ \ \ Authorization \ \ \ Services chtek 1 per state —— —— —
States A\A \for for \
\ \ 01 02 03 04 55 06 | 07 OB 09
— — — — —— —— — — — Alabama 01 This service — Alaska 54 1
—— -
Arizona 02 i — Arkansas 03
— California 04
— Colorado 05
— Connecticut 08 u m D” S i D S ye 8
! 1 — Delaware 07
— Dist. of Col. 08
— Florida 09
— Georgia 1 0 — Idaho 1 1 4
— Illinois 12
— Indiana 13
— Iowa 14
— Kansas 1 5 — Kentucky 16
— Louisiana 1 7 — Maine 18
— Maryland 19
— Massachusetts 20
— Michigan 21
— Minnesota 22
— Mississippi 23
— Missouri 24
— Montana 25
— Nebraska 26
— Nevada 27
— New Hampshire 28
— New Jersey 29
— New Mexico 30
— New York” 31
— North Carolina 32
— North Dakota 33
— Ohio 34
— Oklahoma 35
— Oregon 36 — — Pennsylvania 37
— Puerto Rico 58
— Rhode Island 38
— South Carolina 39
— South Dakota 40
— Tennessee 41 I — Texas 42
— Utah 43
— Vermont 44
— Virginia 45
— Washington 46
— West Virginia 47
— Wisconsin 48
— Wyoming 49 ^mm — Virgin Islands 50
— Guam 51
— t Please complete a separate from lor Texas Statistical Agent Service. *FA lor New York rules Is applicable to classification and territories only. Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law. Rating Information Services correspond to loss/cost and rules services. Rev. 1/2007

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Original or Revision O Original Participation lor this Line of Insurance Or Deletion            n Revised Line of Insurance            Participation for this Une ol Insurance n Deletion of this EMPLOmiKT-RELATED PRACTICES LIABILITY            DOE            Lins of Insurance 3 g 0 — —— — Effective Date            Line Services            Rules Forms —
Month            Day            Year —— —
\ Participation \ State \ Services            Flling (chek 1 per state) Authorization \ \ \ \ —— —— —
States            v\\\\ 01 02 03 04 05 | 06 I 07 08 09
— — — — —— —— — — — Ajabama 01 1
—— -
Alaska 54
— Arizona 02 4
— Arkansas 03 — California 04
— Colorado 05
— Connecticut 06
— Delaware; 07
— Dist. of Col. 08
— Florida 09
— Georgia 10
— Idaho 11 i 4
— Illinois 12
— Indiana 13
— Iowa 14
— Kansas 15
— Kentucky 18
— Louisiana 17
— Maine 18
— Maryland 19
— Massachusetts 20
— Michigan 21
— Minnesota 22
— Mississippi 23
— Missouri 24
— Montana 25
— Nebraska 26 -= — Nevada 27
— New Hampshire 28
— New Jersey 29
— New Mexico 30
— New York* 31
— North Caollna 32
— North Dakota 33
— Ohio 34
— Oklahoma 35
— Dragon 36
— Pennsylvania 37
— Puerto Rico 58
— Rhode Island 38
— South Carolina 39
— South Dakota 40
— Tennessee 41 I            Mi ^ — Texas 42
— Utah 43
— Vermont 44
— Virginia 45
— Washington 46
— West Virginia 47
— Wisconsin 48
— Wyoming 49
— Virgin Islands 50
— Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement — Original or Revision D Original Participation for this Line of Insurance Or Deletion ^ Revvisedl Line of Insurance            Participation lor this Line of Insurance O Deletion of this Line of FARM            noriF            Insurance 0 8 0 — —— — Effective Date            Line Services            Rules Forms —
Worth            Day            Year —— —
Participation            State \ Services            Filing \ \ \ Authorization \ \ \ \ (check 1 per stae) —— —— —
States            A \\\\\ — — 01 02 03 04 05 | OS            I 07 08 09 Rev. 1/2005 — — — —— —— —— — —— — Alabama 01
— Alaska 54
— Arizona 03 i — Arkansas 03
— California 04
— Colorado            OS — Connecticut 08
— Delaware 07
— Florida 09
— Georgia 10
— Idaho 1 1 4 — Illinois 12
— Indiana 13
— Iowa 14
— Kansas 15
— Kentucky 16
— Louisiana 17
— Maine 18
— Maryiand 19
— Massachusetts 20
— Michigan 21
— Minnesota 22
— Mississippi 23
— Missouri 24
— Montana 25
— Nebraska 26
— Nevada 27
— New Hampshire 28
— New Jersey 29
— New Mexico 30
— New York” 31
— North Carolina 32
— North Dakota 33
— Ohio 34
— Oklahoma 35
— Oregon 38
— Pennsylvania 37
— Puerto Rico 58
— Rhode Island 38
— South Carolina 39
— South Dakota 40
— Tennessee 41 - HZ — Texas 42
— Utah 43
— Vermont 44 I            I —— —
Virginia 45
— Washington 46
— West Virginia 47 — I            i —— — —
Wisconsin 48 m — Wyomina 49 — Virgin Islands 50
— Guam 51 I — Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law. Rating Information Services correspond to loss/cost and rules services. *FA for New York rules is applicable to classification and territories only.

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement — Original or Revision Q Ori9inal participation for this Line of Insurance Or Deletion Line of Insurance            Revised Participation for this Line of Insurance O GENERAL LIABILITY 0 ODE            Delation ol this Une ol Insurance 1 0 0 —— — Effective Date            Line Services            Rules Forms —
Month            Day            Year — \ Participation \ (check 1 per state) V State \ Filing \ \ \ Services            Authorization \ \ \ —— —
Stales \ A — 01 02 03 04 06 | 06 07 OB 09
—— —— —— — —— — — — — D 1 en ES’ D ffl § fi> 1 & o 1 8 s 8 | Alabama 01 I            I —— -
Alaska 54
— Arizona 02 I — Arkansas 03
— California 04
— Colorado 05
— Connecticut 06
— Delaware 07
— Dist. of Col. 08
— Florida 09
— Georgia 10 = = — Hawaii 52
— Idaho 11
— Illinois 12
— Indiana 13
— Iowa 14
— Kansas 15
— Kentucky 16
— Louisiana 1 7 — Maine 18
— Maryland 19
— Massachusetts 20
— Michigan 21
— Minnesota 22
— Mississippi 23
— Missouri 24
— Montana 25
— Nebraska 26
— Nevada 27
— New Hampshire 28
— New Jersey 29 I —— -
New Mexico 30 | | —— —
New York* 31
— North Carolina 32
— North Dakota 33
— Ohio 34
— Oklahoma 35
— Oregon 36
— Pennsylvania 37
— Puerto Rico 58
— Rhode Island 38
— South Carolina 39
— South Dakota 40
— Tennessee 41
— Texas 42
— Utah 43
— Vermont 44
— Virginia 45
— Washington 48
— West Virginia 47
— Wisconsin 48
— Wyoming 49
— Virgin Islands 50
— Guam 51
— Please complete a separate form for Texas Statistical Agent Service. ‘FA (or New York rules Is applicable to classification and territories only. Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law. Rating Information Services correspond to loss/cost and rules services. Rev. 1/2007

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement } —
Line of Insurance            Original or Revision D °"<* ml p « rtlc| pa*” *» ins ur » of insurance GLASS            Or Deletion ^ Revised Participation for this Line of Insurance D Deletion of this Line of Insurance cooe            GLUE —
Line Services            Rules Forms Effective Date            D            D - Month            Day            Year — k            Rev.
Participation \ foteek 1 Stalo \ Filing ‘ \ \\\ ptr *Mo) \ Services \ Authorization —— —— —
\\\ \\\\\ \ w \WA s*»t»« V            A. MvA\V            A\\\\\\ —— —— —
1 01 I 02 \ 03 [ 04 J            W. } 09 07 1 08 1 08 | 11 1 10 —— —— —
Alabama 01 I            I —— -
Alaska 54
— Arizona 02 I — Arkansas 03
— California 04
— Colorado 05
— Connecticut 06
— Delaware 07
— Dist. of Col. 08
— Florida 09
— Georgia 10 = = — Hawaii 52
— Idaho 11
— Illinois 12
— Indiana 13
— Iowa 14
— Kansas 15
— Kentucky 16
— Louisiana 1 7 — Maine 18
— Maryland 19
— Massachusetts 20
— Michigan 21
— Minnesota 22
— Mississippi 23
— Missouri 24
— Montana 25
— Nebraska 26
— Nevada 27
— New Hampshire 28
— New Jersey 29 I —— -
New Mexico 30 | | —— —
New York* 31
— North Carolina 32
— North Dakota 33
— Ohio 34
— Oklahoma 35
— Oregon 36
— Pennsylvania 37
— Puerto Rico 58
— Rhode Island 38
— South Carolina 39
— South Dakota 40
— Tennessee 41
— Texas 42
— Utah 43
— Vermont 44
— Virginia 45
— Washington 48
— West Virginia 47
— Wisconsin 48
— Wyoming 49
— Virgin Islands 50
— Guam 51
— t Please complete a separate form for Texas Statistical Agent Service. Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law.

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement —
Participation for this Una of Insurance Or Deletion ^ Revlsed Participation for this Una of Line of Insurance COMMERCIAL INLAUD MARINE ^ Insurance D Deletion of this Line of Insurance 1 2 0
- — — Effective Date            Line Services            Rules Forms n            n — Month            Day            Year —— —
lypeof \ Participation            State \ Services \ Filing \ V \ Aulhorlzatlon \ \ \ \ lohtcklpirilllo) ‘ —— —— —
States \ \ V \\v            v \\ * ‘ \\\ £ \\v \\ Yw\ \\\\\\\\\ -— — -— — — 01 02 03 04 05 | 06 | 07 08 09
— — — — —— —— — — — n i a % tt n o I s I a ff ! Alabama 01 I            I —— -
Alaska 54
— Arizona 02 I — Arkansas 03
— California 04
— Colorado 05
— Connecticut 06
— Delaware 07
— Dist. of Col. 08
— Florida 09
— Georgia 10 = = — Hawaii 52
— Idaho 11
— Illinois 12
— Indiana 13
— Iowa 14
— Kansas 15
— Kentucky 16
— Louisiana 1 7 — Maine 18
— Maryland 19
— Massachusetts 20
— Michigan 21
— Minnesota 22
— Mississippi 23
— Missouri 24
— Montana 25
— Nebraska 26
— Nevada 27
— New Hampshire 28
— New Jersey 29 I —— -
New Mexico 30 | | —— —
New York* 31
— North Carolina 32
— North Dakota 33
— Ohio 34
— Oklahoma 35
— Oregon 36
— Pennsylvania 37
— Puerto Rico 58
— Rhode Island 38
— South Carolina 39
— South Dakota 40
— Tennessee 41
— Texas 42
— Utah 43
— Vermont 44
— Virginia 45
— Washington 48
— West Virginia 47
— Wisconsin 48
— Wyoming 49
— Virgin Islands 50
— Guam 51
— t Please complete a separate form for Texas Statistical Agent Service. ‘FA for New York rules Is applicable to classification and territories only. Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law. Rating Information Services correspond to and rules services. R9V. 1/2005

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Original or Revision D °" 9lnal fortdpo* 1 ” “» »i» uhb of insurance Line of Insurance            QP Deletion ^ Revised Participation for this Line of Insurance D Deletion of this Una of MANAGEMENT PROTECTION PROGRAM            ra 3DE            Insurance 3 5 0
- —— — Effective Date            Line Services            Rules Forms Month            Day            Year —— —
\ Type of \ \ Participation \ State \ Services \ Filing \ \ \ Authorization \ \ \ \ lotKok 1 per itatt) ] —— —— —
^ \y\y \ A * ‘ vw\ States \ * \ * V \ A \ % « \V\\\\\\\ — —— —— — _25___L_£2_| 01 02 03 04 05 | OB            j 07 1
— — — — —— —— — Alabama 01 1 1
—— —
Alaska 54 i — Arizona 02
— Arkansas 03
— California 04
— Colorado 05
— Connecticut 06
— Delaware 07
— Dist. of Col. 06
— Florida 09
— ™ Georgia 10 = ? I — Hawaii 52
— Idaho 11
— Illinois 12
— Indiana 13
— Iowa 14 ___r            i —— —
Kansas 15
— Kentucky 16
— Louisiana 17
— Maine 18
— Maryland 19 = — Massachusetts 20
— Michigan 21 ^B —— —
Minnesota 22 ^B —— —
Mississippi 23 ^B —— —
Missouri 24 ^B —— —
Montana 25 ^B —— —
Nebraska 26 = — = u — Nevada 27
— New Hampshire 26
— New Jersey 29 i            i ^B —— —— —
New Mexico 30 Et            H — New York 31
— North Carolina 32
— North Dakota 33 i            i ^H —— —— —
Ohio 34 ^B —— —
Oklahoma 35 ^B —— —
Oregon 36 ^| —— —
Pennsylvania 37 ^B —— —
Puerto Rico 56 ^B —— —
Rhode Island 36 ^B —— —
South Carolina 39 ^B —— —
South Dakota 40 ^B —— —
Tennessee 41 i 1^ 4
— Texas 42
— Utah 43
— Vermont 44 ^B —— —
Virginia 45 ^B —— —
Washington 46 ^B —— —
West Virginia 47 ^B —— —
I Wisconsin 48 El l Rev. 1/2005 — Wyoming 49 — Virgin Islands 50
— Guam 51
— t Please complete a separate form for Texas Statistical Agent Service. Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law.

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 380 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 150 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 370 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 340 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 330 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 090 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 020 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

(IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line Of Insurance            Original Or Revision n Original Participation this Line of Insurance MARKET SEGMEMTS co DE 030 or Deletion n Revised Participation for this line of Insurance Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month            Day            Year Type of \ state \ Filing \ \ Perticipation \ Services \ Authorization \ \ (check per state) \ \ \ \ Member            Subcriber            Service Purchaser            Loss Costs Rules            forms            Rules            forms Statistical Agent Service States 01 02 03 04 09 08 | 07 | 08 09 Alabama 01 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 . Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado 05 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dist. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawali 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 28 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsyivania 37 Puerio Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 50 Guam 51

 


 

      (IMAGE)
Participation Agreement Supplement Line Of Insurance Original Participation for this Line of Insurance Revised Participation for this Line of Insurance Deletion of this Line of Insurance PERSONAL INLAND MARINE CODE 040 or Deletion Line Services Rules Forms Effective Date Month Day Year Type of Participation check 1 per state) State Services Filing Authorization Rating Information States Member Subscriber Service Purchaser Service Forms Rulles Forms Statistioal Agent Service Actuarial Service 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Alaska 54 Arizona 02 This Arkansas 03 Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dlst. of Col. 08 Florida 09 2 Georgia 10 Hawaii 52 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 3. Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 * Minnesota 22 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 26 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsylvania 37 Puerto Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 4D Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Virgin Islands 60 Guam 61 Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law. Rating Information Services correspond to loss/cost and rules services. Rev. 4/2003

 


 

      (IMAGE)
Participation Supplement Line of Insurance PERSONAL LIABILITY code 045 Original or Revision or Deletion Original Participation for this Line of Insurance Revised Participation for this Line of Insurance Deletion of this Line of Insurance Effective Date Month Day Year Line Services Rules Forms State Services Filing .Authorization Participation check 1 per state) Rating Information
States Member Subscriber Service Purchaser Service Forms Rulles Forms Statistioal Agent Service Actuarial Service
01 02 03 04 05 O6 07 08 Alabama D1 Alaska 54 I Arizona D2 Arkansas 03 California 04 Colorado OS Connecticut 06 Delaware 07 Dlst. of Col. 08 Florida 09 Georgia 10 Hawaii 52 Idaho 11 Illinois 12 Indiana 13 Iowa 14 Kansas 15 Kentucky 16 Louisiana 17 Maine 18 Maryland 19 Massachusetts 20 Michigan 21 Minnesota 22 Mississippi 23 Missouri 24 Montana 25 Nebraska 26 Nevada 27 New Hampshire 28 New Jersey 29 New Mexico 30 New York 31 North Carolina 32 North Dakota 33 Ohio 34 Oklahoma 35 Oregon 36 Pennsylvania 37 Puerto Rico 58 Rhode Island 38 South Carolina 39 South Dakota 40 Tennessee 41 Texas 42 Utah 43 Vermont 44 Virginia 45 Washington 46 West Virginia 47 Wisconsin 48 Wyoming 49 Vlrgin Islands 60 Guam 61 Note: In certain states, services may be limited by law. Rating Information Services correspond to loss/cost and rules services. FA for New York rules is applicable to classification and territories only. Rev. 1/2005

 


 

      (IMAGE)
Participation Supplement—Instructions General Instructions Please complete a separate Participation Agreement Supplement for each line of insurance for which you need our services. Lines of Insurance The lines of Insurance serviced by ISO are: Personal Lines Commercial Lines Personal Automobile Commercial Automobile (Liability and Physical Damage) · Boiler & Machinery · Dwelling Property Crime & Fidelity Homeowners E-commerce Personal Inland Marine Farm Personal Liability Financial Institutions Commercial Property General Liability Glass Commercial Inland Marine Commercial Package Policy · Professional Liability Businessowners · Employment-Related Practices Liability · Market Segments · Commercial Umbrella · Capital Assets (Output Policy) · Management Protection Program Note: Basic Service is automatically provided to all companies participating for any Line Service or Actuarial Service. Effective Date The effective date should be a current or prospective date. Please use two- digit numerical entries for month/day/year. Format On the front of the Participation Agreement Supplement, please select: · the effective date of this participation; · the type of participation you want; · the specific services you want. On the back of the Participation Agreement Supplement, please: · identify your company/group; · have an authorized official of your company sign the form. . How to Indicate Changes If this is an original submission for this line of insurance, the form you submit to us should fully represent your entire desired participation at the date of signing. When you wish to revise an existing participation, indicate on the Participation Agreement Supplement only those items that are to be changed. If you are expanding your participation, place an (x) in the appropriate box(es). Place an (o) in the appropriate box(es) to delete any participation service. A check in the Deletion box will delete your participation for the entire line of insurance. Type of Service Please indicate the specific services you want by indicating an (x) in the appropriate boxes. The following guide may be helpful in identifying which services and products are available for each participation. Line Service — Rules —This service entitles your company to receive our multistate rules information distributed by circular and by manual. Over Rev. 1/2005

 


 

      (IMAGE)
Participation Supplement—instructions (cont’d) Type of Service . Line Service — Forms —This service entitles your company to receive our multistate forms information distributed by circular and by forms portfolio manual. State Service — Rating Information Services This service entitles your company to receive our advisory loss costs and rules information for the specific state(s) selected. A company must also be participating for Line Service — Rules and State Service — Rules in order to obtain this service. — Forms This service entitles your company to receive our forms information for the specific state(s) selected. A company must also be participating for Line Service — Forms in order to obtain this service. Filing Authorization This service authorizes ISO to file its Rules and/or Forms on your behalf and is available only to those Member and Subscriber companies also participating for the corresponding State Services. In addition to completing the appropriate columns on this Participation Agreement Supplement, please complete a Filing Authorization Form. Central Distribution — Forms Central Distribution — Forms entitles companies to order multiple copies of ISO’s forms and endorsements. Statistical Agent Service This service authorizes ISO to act as your company’s statistical agent. ISO’s Statistical Division will contact you with pertinent instructions and eligibility requirements for the various types of statistical plans, and will assist you in selecting the most practical plan available to suit your needs. Actuarial Service For all lines of insurance, you must also participate for Line Service — Rules in order to obtain Actuarial Service. The Actuarial Service participation is a single countrywide participation per line, although both countrywide and state information is supplied. Check the box at the top of the appropriate column to participate for this service. Manuals and Circulars Please complete and return the appropriate order forms in order to receive ISO’s manual and circular services. Please feel free to contact ISO Customer Service at 1-800-888-4476 option 2 if you require assistance in ordering any of our products. Return Address Please return your completed Participation Agreement Supplements to: ISO Customer Service 545 Washington Boulevard Jersey City, NJ 07310-1686 Questions If you have any questions about the completion of these forms, or about your company’s ISO participation, please feel free to contact Customer Service at 1-800-888-4476, Option 2 or Fax: (201) 748-1472. Rev. 11/2004

 


 

      (IMAGE)
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC. Participation Supplement—Texas: Instructions General Instructions Please complete this supplement for all companies writing business in Texas. If you have not already done so, you must also execute the ISO Master Agreement. How to Complete This Form 1. On the first page of the Participation Supplement Texas, please identify your company name, NAIC company number and NAIC group number, and company IRD #. 2. For each line of insurance for which you write business in Texas, please select the reporting option you want as indicated in the
appropriate sections. 3. On the back page of the Participation Supplement Texas, please have an authorized official of your company sign the form, and complete
remaining information on the back page. 4. One supplement can be used for several companies ONLY if the information is identical for all companies listed. All companies for which participation information applies should be listed on the back page. Separate supplement forms are needed for each company with unique statistical reporting information. How to Indicate Changes If this is an original submission, the form you submit should fully represent your reporting options for all commercial lines you write in Texas. If you need to make a revision to any selection, expand into new lines of insurance, or delete a prior selection (if you no longer write that type of insurance), place an (x) in the appropriate box(es). A check mark in the Delete box indicates your company no longer writes that line of insurance. In all cases, the deletion of a line of insurance requires an exemption from the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI). To add or delete a company from your group, please indicate on the back page. Statistical Reporting Date This date should identify the earliest quarter/year when data will be submitted to ISO. Return Address Please return your completed Participation Supplement Texas to: Insurance Services Office, Inc. Customer Service Division 545 Washington Boulevard Jersey City, NJ 07310-1686 Questions If you have any questions about the completion of this form, please feel free to contact our Customer Service Division at (800) 888-4476 opt. 2. Fax: (201)748-1472.

 


 

(PICTURE)
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
Participation Supplement—Texas TEXAS COMMERCIAL LINES STATISTICAL AGENT SERVICE Service Purchaser Participation Name of Group/Co.: NAIC Group#: Original or Revision            Original Participation NAIC Company *: ...................... Revised Participation IRD#:
Insurers may report under the format of ISO’s amended Commercial Statistical Plan for Texas (CSP Plus) or the format of the Texas Commercial Lines Statistical Plan (TCLSP). For Liability, Property, Businessowners, Commercial Automobile and Miscellaneous Commercial, data reported under CSP Plus may be utilized in ISO loss cost development at each insurer’s option. If you give ISO permission to utilize the data you report under CSP Plus in our loss cost development, the ISO statistical reporting credit program will be applicable to the data. Data reported under TCLSP is not utilized in ISO loss cost development and therefore is not eligible for a statistical reporting credit.
Please indicate the line categories for which you will report Texas commercial statistical data, and whether the data can be utilized in ISO loss cost development, by checking all appropriate boxes:
LINES OF INSURANCE LIABILITY General Liability            code 100
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may not be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in TCLSP format. Data reported in this format is not utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New            Delete Change format
Vendor (if applicable): (e.g., TICO)

 


 

(PICTURE)
Medical Professional Liability code 150
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may not be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in TCLSP format. Data reported in this format is not utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New            Delete            Change format Vendor (if applicable): (e.g., TICO) COMMERCIAL PROPERTY            code 090
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may not be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in TCLSP format. Data reported in this format is not utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New            Delete Change format
Vendor (if applicable):(e : g., TICO)

 


 

(PICTURE)
BUSINESSOWNERS code 130
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may not be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in TCLSP format. Data reported in this format is not utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New            Delete            Change format Vendor (if applicable): (e.g.,TICO) COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE            code 050
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in CSP Plus format. Data may not be utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New Delete Change format
Data will be reported in TCLSP format. Data reported in this format is not utilized in ISO loss cost development (data is not eligible for the ISO statistical reporting credit program).
Add/New            Delete Change format
Vendor (if applicable):(e.g., TICO)

 


 

(IMAGE)
MISCELLANEOUSCOMMERCIALBoiler&Machinerycode060DatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.DatamaybeutilizedinI SOlosscostdevelopment(dataiseligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangef ormatDatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.DatamaynotbeutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataisnoteligibl efortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatDatawillbereportedinTCLSPforma t.DatareportedinthisformatisnotutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataisnoteligiblefortheISOstatistica lreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatVendor(ifapplicable):(e.g.,TICO)BurglaryandTheftco de070DatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.DatamaybeutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataiseligibleforth eISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatDatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.Da tamaynotbeutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataisnoteligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogr am).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatDatawillbereportedinTCLSPformat.Datareportedinthisformatisnotutilizedin ISOlosscostdevelopment(dataisnoteligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteCha ngeformatVendor(ifapplicable):(e.g.,TICO)

 


 

(IMAGE)
Glasscode110DatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.DatamaybeutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataiseligib lefortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatDatawillbereportedinCSPPlusfo rmat.DatamaynotbeutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataisnoteligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcred itprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatDatawillbereportedinTCLSPformat.Datareportedinthisformatisnotuti lizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataisnoteligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDe leteChangeformatVendor(ifapplicable):(e.g.,TICO)CommercialInlandMarinecode120DatawillbereportedinCSP Plusformat.DatamaybeutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(dataiseligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcred itprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatDatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.DatamaynotbeutilizedinISOlossc ostdevelopment(dataisnoteligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeforma tDatawillbereportedinTCLSPformat.DatareportedinthisformatisnotutilizedinISOlosscostdevelopment(datai snoteligiblefortheISOstatisticalreportingcreditprogram).Add/NewDeleteChangeformatVendor(ifapplicable ):(e.g.,TICO)

 


 

(IMAGE)
FIDELITY&SURETYcode310MonolinePackageDatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.Add/NewDeleteChangeformatData willbereportedinTCLSPformat,Add/NewDeleteChangeformatVendor(ifapplicable):(e.g.,TICO)MISCELLANEOUSPE RSONALcode200PersonalTheftPersonalInlandMarinePersonalGlassPersonalLiabilityDatareportedunderthemisc ellaneouspersonalcoverageslinecategoryisforTexasCommercialLinesStatisticalAgentServicerequirementson ly.CompaniesparticipatingforISOpersonallinesdatareportingmustcontinuetoalsoreportthisdataundertheapp licableISOstatisticalplanandreportingrequirements.DatawillbereportedinCSPPlusformat.Add/NewDeleteCha ngeformatDatawillbereportedinTCLSPformat.Add/NewDeleteChangeformatVendor(ifapplicable):(e.g.,TICO)


 

(IMAGE)
ParticipationSupplement-Texas(cont’d)AgreementThisparticipant,asaServicePurchaserofInsuranceServices Office,Inc.,agreestoabidebytheprovisionsoftheParticipationSupplementexecutedbytheparticipant.Authori zedOfficialSignatureNameTitleStatisticalReportingDate(earliestquarter/yearwhendatawillbesubmitted)Gr oupName(ifapplicable)andNAICGroupNumberIfchanginggroups,indicateoldNAICGroup#:andthennewNAICGroup#:C ompanyNameNAICCo.#AddDeleteCompany(ies)forwhichallparticipationinformationonthisformappliesandforwhi chsignerisauthorizedtoactSeparateSupplementalFormsareneededforeachcompanywithuniquestatisticalreport inginformation.CheckAddorDeleteboxifadding/deletingcompanyfromgroupentirely.HomeOfficeAddressStatist icalContactStreetAddress/P.O.BoxCity/State/ZipTelephoneNo.TelephoneNo.FaxNo.FaxNo.E-mailE-mailDateFo rmCompletedReturntoInsuranceServicesOffice,Inc.CustomerServiceDivision545WashingtonBoulevardJerseyCi ty,NJ07310-1686


 

(IMAGE)
PARTICIPATIONSUPPLEMENTDescription:Thisparticipant,asaMember,Subscriber,orServicePurchaserofInsuranc eServicesOffice,Inc..agreestoabidebytheprovisionsoftheMasterAgreementexecutedbytheparticipant.Delive ry:StandardISOnetInternetdelivery.Apasswordisrequired.Eachsign-onandpasswordmaybeusedonlybyoneauthor izedindividual.ISOwillestablishaccessbasedonyourcompany’slevelofParticipation.Aregistrationkey,withu nlimitedseats,willbeprovidedsoyoucanaccessthefollowingproductsviaISOnet:CommercialLinesManual(includ ingMotorCarrierDigest)PersonalLinesManual(includingtheMicrosoftWorddownload)CircularsFormsFIRSTLegis lativeMonitoringMulti-LineClassTableParticipationPlusCustomer.(ElectronicDeliveryFeeandTermDoNotAppl y)ElectronicDeliveryFee:%(plusapplicabletaxes)Term:GroupName(ifapplicable):Company(ies)forwhichallpa rticipationinformationonthisformappliesandforwhichsignerisauthorizedtoact:HomeOfficeAddress:StreetAd dress/P.O.BoxCity/State/ZIPSignature:PrintName:NameofRegKeyCoordinator:Title:Title:Email:Email:Phone Number:PhoneNumber:Date:Revised

 


 

(IMAGE)
PARTICIPATIONSUPPLEMENTFORCHANGESTOPARTICIPATIONDescription:Thisparticipant,asaMember.Subscriber,orS ervicePurchaserofInsuranceServicesOffice,Inc.,agreestoabidebytheprovisionsoftheMasterAgreementexecut edbytheparticipant.GroupName(ifapplicable):Company(ies)forwhichallparticipationinformationonthisform appliesandforwhichsignerisauthorizedtoact:HomeOfficeAddress:StreetAddress/P.O.BoxCity/State/ZIPSigna ture:PrintName:Title:Email:PhoneNumber:Date:Revised

 


 

(IMAGE)
FilingAuthorizationFormDonotsandthislettertotheNewYorkStateInsuranceDepartmentPleasesenditto:ISOCust omerService545WashingtonBoulevardJerseyCity.NJ07310-1685TotheCommissionerofInsurance:Youareherebyaut horizedtoacceptasfledonbehalfoftheundersignedMEMBERorSUBSCRIBERofINSURANCESERVICESOFFICE,INC..suchma terialspecifiedonthisformrelatedtoClassifications,Rules,RatingPlansandRules,PolicyFormsandEndorsemen tsandanyinformationpertainingthereto,whicharefiledInyourofficebyInsuranceServicesOffice,Inc.withresp ecttooneormorekindsofinsurance,subdivisionsandkindsofInsuranceorclassesofrisks,oranypartofcombinatio nofthaforegoingforwhichtheundersignedIsnoworhereafterlicensedlotransactbusiness.ThisRingAuthorizatio nshallbedeemedamendedtotheextentthatanyrangIsmadeInyourofficedirectlybytheunder—signedcompanyandisin consistentwiththefilingofsaidInsuranceServicesOffice,Inc.ThisFilingAuthorizationreplacesanyauthoriza tioncurrentlyinyourofficeonbehalfoftheundersignedcompanyandmayberevokedoramendedatanytimebysuchactio nasspecificallysetforthorbynotificationtoyourofficebytheunder—signedcompanyorbyInsuranceServicesOffi ce,Inc.SignatureorOfficialTypedNameandTitleofOfficialNameatCompanyHomeOfficeStreetAddressCityStateZi pRev.10/2004FilingAuthorizationForm—InstructionsGeneralIfyourcompanyisparticipatinginISOasaMemberor SubscriberforoneormoreSlateServicesandyouwishtograntISOfilingauthorization,thisformmustbecompletedfo rallapplicablejurisdictions.Pleasecomplete:theflingauthorizationcolumnsoftheParticipationAgreementSu pplement,andthisFilingAuthorizationFormLimitationsNewYorkIfyouIntendtoauthorizeISOtomatefilingsonyou rbehalfIntheStaleofNewYork,youmustcompletetheFilingAuthorizationFormfromtheStaleofNewYorkGeneralISOc annotfileonyourbehalfincertainjunsdictionsforcertainlinesofinsurance.ThesejurisdictionsandlinesofIns uranceareHackedoutonthechartInsidethisform.Foradditionallimitations,seetheParticipationAgreementSupp lementforeachlineofInsurance.FormatOnthispagearegeneralInstructionsconcerningtheFilingAuthorizationF orm.Onthecenterpagesare:asectionforyoutoindicatetheeffectivedateofthisform;acharttoidentifywhatlines youauthorizeustofileonyourbehallandinwhatstales:andasectionforyoutoIndicateanyexceptionstothisauthor ization.RevisionsOncethefilingauthorizationhasbeenestablished,youmaymakeanysubsequentchangestofiling authorizationforalineofInsuranceandstatebysendingISOaFilingAuthorizationChangeLetter.ReturntoDONOTSE NDTHISFORMTOANYINSURANCEDEPARTMENT!PleasesendthiscompteledFilingAuthorizationFormto:ISOCustomerServi ce545WashingtonBoulevardJerseyCity,NewJersey07310-1686ISOwillmaintaintheoriginalFilingAuthorizationF orminitsfiles.Aphotocopyoftheformwillbesenttotheappropriateinsurancedepartment( s).Over

 


 

(IMAGE)
FilingAuthorizationFormEffectiveDalePleaseIndicatethedatayouwishthisfilingAuthorizationtobeeffective Thisdateshouldbecurrentorprospective.AuthorizationCodesInsertthecodesfistedbelowIntheappropriateboxo fthechart,i.e.,byState,andTypesorKindsofInsurance:2.Rules6.Rules,Forms4.FormsExceptions.Exceptionsfo rRingAuthorizationshouldbeIndicatedInthespaceprovidedbelow.Indicatetheline,thanthestate.Ifappropriat e,followedbyadescriptionoftheexception(e.g..“ProfessionalLiability—allstates—wewillliteourownlawye r’sprofessionalliabilityrulesandforms”).EffectiveDateForISOUseOnlyAlabamaAlaskaDelawareDist.ofColumb iaHawaiidoholowakansaskentuckylousianaMaineMarylandpenesliviamississippijgSl^.1,.i£aNorthCorolinaohi ooregonPenesyeviautahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWestvirginiawisconsinThesenotesapplyunlesslimitedbyane xceptiontoStagauthority:HomeownorsincludesMobHehome:FarmInsuranceIncludesFarmCombinationCoverage.For mProperly,Farmliability,andFarmIntendMarina:andCommercialMultipleLineincludestheCommercialPackagePol icyProgramandtheBusinessownersProgram.

 

Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-152973 of our report dated August 12, 2008, relating to the financial statements of Insurance Services Office, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs regarding the Company’s adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)) appearing in the Prospectus, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and of our report dated August 12, 2008, relating to the financial statement schedule appearing elsewhere in such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Prospectus.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
October 7, 2008

Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-152973 of our report dated August 12, 2008, relating to the balance sheet of Verisk Analytics, Inc. appearing in the Prospectus, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Prospectus.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
October 7, 2008

Exhibit 23.3
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use of our report dated May 5, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Xactware, Inc. included in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-152973) and related Prospectus of Verisk Analytics, Inc. for the registration of shares of its common stock.
/s/ Ernst & Young
Salt Lake City, Utah
September 30, 2008