UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
COMMISSION FILE
NO. 001-32876
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE
CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
20-0052541
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
22 SYLVAN WAY
PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
07054
(Zip Code)
|
973-753-6000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
|
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
|
|
ON WHICH REGISTERED
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer
or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes
o
No
þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30,
2008, was $3,178,464,327. All executive officers and directors
of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of
the foregoing calculation, to be affiliates of the
registrant.
As of January 31, 2009, the registrant had outstanding
177,509,822 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement prepared for the 2009 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this report.
PART I
OVERVIEW
As one of the worlds largest hospitality companies, we
offer individual consumers and business customers a broad suite
of hospitality products and services across various
accommodation alternatives and price ranges through our
portfolio of world-renowned brands. With more than 20 brands,
which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn,
Super 8, Wyndham Rewards, Wingate, Microtel, RCI, The Registry
Collection, Endless Vacation Rentals, Landal GreenParks,
Cottages4You, Novasol, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham, we have built a significant presence in most major
hospitality markets in the United States and throughout the rest
of the world.
The hospitality industry is a major component of the travel
industry, which is the third-largest retail industry in the
United States after the automotive and food stores industries.
We operate primarily in the lodging, vacation exchange and
rentals, and vacation ownership segments of the hospitality
industry:
|
|
|
Through our lodging business, we franchise hotels in the
upscale, midscale, and economy segments of the lodging industry
and provide hotel management services to owners of luxury,
upscale and midscale hotels;
|
|
|
Through our vacation exchange and rentals business, we provide
vacation exchange products and services and access to
distribution systems and networks to resort developers and
owners of intervals of vacation ownership interests, and we
market vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of
independent owners, vacation ownership developers and other
hospitality providers; and
|
|
|
Through our vacation ownership business, we develop, market and
sell vacation ownership interests to individual consumers,
provide consumer financing in connection with the sale of
vacation ownership interests and provide management services at
resorts.
|
We provide directly to individual consumers our high quality
products and services, including the various accommodations we
market, such as hotels, vacation resorts, villas and cottages,
and products we offer, such as vacation ownership interests. We
also provide valuable products and services to our business
customers, such as franchisees, hotel owners, affiliated resort
developers and prospective developers. These products and
services include marketing and central reservation systems,
inventory networks and distribution channels, back office
services and loyalty programs. We strive to provide value-added
products and services that are intended to both enhance the
travel experience of the individual consumer and drive revenue
to our business customers. The depth and breadth of our
businesses across different segments of the hospitality industry
provide us with the opportunity to expand our relationships with
our existing individual consumers and business customers in one
or more segments of our business by offering them additional or
alternative products and services from our other segments.
Historically, we have pursued what we believe to be
financially-attractive entry points in the major global
hospitality markets to strengthen our portfolio of products and
services.
The largest portion of our revenues comes from fees we receive
in exchange for providing services and products. For example, we
receive fees in the form of royalties for our customers
utilization of our brands and for our provision of hotel and
resort management and vacation exchange and rentals services.
The remainder of our revenues comes from the proceeds received
from sales of products, such as vacation ownership interests and
related services.
Our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses all have both domestic and international
operations. During 2008, we derived 76% of our revenues in the
United States and 24% internationally. For a discussion of our
segment revenues, profits, assets and geographical operations,
see the notes to financial statements of this Annual Report. For
additional information concerning our business, see Item 2.
Properties, of this Annual Report.
History
and Development
Prior to August 2006, we were a wholly owned subsidiary of
Cendant Corporation (which changed its name to Avis Budget
Group, Inc. in September 2006). Cendant Corporation was created
in December 1997 through the merger of CUC International, Inc.,
or CUC, and HFS Incorporated, or HFS. Prior to the merger, HFS
was a major hospitality, real estate and car rental franchisor.
At the time of the merger, HFS franchised hotels worldwide
through brands, such as Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard
Johnson and Travelodge and had recently acquired Resort
Condominiums International, Inc., a premier vacation exchange
business. Subsequent to the merger, Cendant took a
1
number of steps and completed a number of transactions to grow
its Hospitality Services business and to develop its Timeshare
Resorts (vacation ownership) business, including the following:
|
|
|
entry into the vacation ownership business with the acquisitions
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts (formerly Fairfield Resorts) and
WorldMark by Wyndham (formerly Trendwest Resorts) in 2001 and
2002, respectively;
|
|
|
entry into the vacation rentals business through the acquisition
of various brands, including Cuendet and the Holiday Cottages
group of brands, which includes Cottages4You, in 2001, Novasol
in 2002, and Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays in 2004;
|
|
|
commencement of the Wyndham Rewards (formerly TripRewards)
loyalty program in 2003;
|
|
|
purchase of all remaining ownership rights to the Ramada brand
on a worldwide basis from Marriott International in 2004;
|
|
|
acquisition of the global Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand,
related vacation ownership development rights and selected hotel
management contracts in October 2005; and
|
|
|
acquisition of the Baymont brand in April 2006.
|
Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging
business began operations in 1990 with the acquisition of the
Howard Johnson and Ramada brands, each of which opened its first
hotel in 1954. RCI, the best known brand in our vacation
exchange and rentals business, was established 35 years
ago, and our vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and Wyndham Resort Development Corporation, which operates as
WorldMark by Wyndham, began vacation ownership operations in
1980 and 1989, respectively.
Prior to July 31, 2006, Cendant transferred to Wyndham
Worldwide all of the assets and liabilities of Cendants
Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses
and, on July 31, 2006, Cendant distributed all of the
shares of Wyndham common stock to the holders of Cendant common
stock issued and outstanding on July 21, 2006, the record
date for the distribution. The separation was effective on
July 31, 2006. On August 1, 2006, we commenced
regular way trading on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol WYN.
Subsequent to our separation from Cendant, we further expanded
our global presence in the lodging industry by acquiring a 30%
equity interest in CHI Limited, a joint venture that provides
management services to luxury and upscale hotels in Europe, the
Middle East and Africa, in November 2006, and expanding our
economy brands and entering the extended stay segment by
acquiring the Microtel and Hawthorn brands in July 2008.
WYNDHAM
HOTEL GROUP
Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we use the term hotels to apply to hotels, motels
and/or
other
similar accommodations, as applicable. In addition, the term
franchise system refers to a system through which a
franchisor licenses a brand and provides services to hotels
whose independent owners pay to receive such license and
services from the franchisor under the specific terms of a
franchise or similar agreement. The services provided through a
franchise system typically include reservations, sales leads,
marketing and advertising support, training, quality assurance
inspections, operational support and information, pre-opening
assistance, prototype construction plans, and national or
regional conferences.
Lodging
Industry Overview
The $143 billion domestic lodging industry is a significant
segment of the hospitality industry. Companies in the lodging
industry generally operate in one or more of the various lodging
segments, including luxury, upscale, midscale and economy, and
generally operate under one or more business models, including
franchise, management
and/or
ownership. In 2008, the U.S. lodging industry aggregated
approximately 4.6 million guest rooms, which are comprised
of approximately 3.1 million rooms in franchised hotels and
approximately 1.5 million rooms in independent hotels. We
generally obtain our industry data from either
PricewaterhouseCoopers or Smith Travel Research.
The lodging industry is driven by two main factors: (i) the
general health of the travel and tourism industry and
(ii) the propensity for corporate spending on business
travel. Beginning in Q4 2008, the industry experienced dramatic
declines in both leisure and business travel. Occupancy levels
for 2008 were the worst since 2003. Demand for lodging in the
United States declined by a 0.4% Compound Annual Growth Rate
(CAGR) for the five year period from 2004 through 2008, and is
expected to decline another 6.4% 2009 versus 2008. During this
five year period, the industry added approximately 589,000
rooms. The number of room starts declined in 2008 for the first
time since 2002, and is forecasted to decline considerably in
2009.
2
Performance in the lodging industry is measured by certain key
metrics, such as average daily rate, or ADR, average occupancy
rate and revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is
calculated by multiplying ADR by the average occupancy rate. In
2008, ADR in the United States was $106.55, which is 2.4% higher
than the rate in the prior year, the average occupancy rate was
60.4%, which is 4.2% lower than the rate in the prior year, and
RevPAR was $64.37, which is down 1.9% from the prior year. The
following table demonstrates the trends in the key performance
metrics:
Trends in
Performance Metrics in the United States since 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Change in
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
Rate
|
|
Occupancy Rate
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
in ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
2004
|
|
|
61.4%
|
|
3.6 %
|
|
$
|
86.40
|
|
|
4.2 %
|
|
$
|
53.02
|
|
|
7.9 %
|
2005
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
2.9 %
|
|
|
91.15
|
|
|
5.5 %
|
|
|
57.55
|
|
|
8.5 %
|
2006
|
|
|
63.3%
|
|
0.3 %
|
|
|
97.98
|
|
|
7.5 %
|
|
|
62.02
|
|
|
7.8 %
|
2007
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
(0.4)%
|
|
|
104.04
|
|
|
6.2 %
|
|
|
65.61
|
|
|
5.8 %
|
2008
|
|
|
60.4%
|
|
(4.2)%
|
|
|
106.55
|
|
|
2.4 %
|
|
|
64.37
|
|
|
(1.9)%
|
2009E
|
|
|
56.5%
|
|
(6.4)%
|
|
|
101.05
|
|
(5.2)
|
%
|
|
|
57.13
|
|
|
(11.2)%
|
Sources:
Smith
Travel Research (2004 to 2008); PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009).
2009 data is as of January 2009.
Performance in the lodging industry is also measured by revenues
earned by companies in the industry and by the number of new
rooms added on a yearly basis. In 2008, the lodging industry
earned revenues of $142.6 billion and added 138,300 new
rooms. The following table demonstrates trends in revenues and
new rooms:
Trends in
Revenues and New Rooms in the United States since 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Change in
|
|
New
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
($bn)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Rooms (000s)
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
2004
|
|
$
|
113.6
|
|
|
8.0 %
|
|
|
81.3
|
|
|
6.0 %
|
2005
|
|
|
122.6
|
|
|
7.9 %
|
|
|
83.3
|
|
|
2.5 %
|
2006
|
|
|
133.3
|
|
|
8.8 %
|
|
|
139.7
|
|
|
67.6 %
|
2007
|
|
|
139.3
|
|
|
4.5 %
|
|
|
146.8
|
|
|
5.1 %
|
2008
|
|
|
142.6
|
|
|
2.4 %
|
|
|
138.3
|
|
|
(5.8)%
|
2009E
|
|
|
129.5
|
|
|
(9.2)%
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
(69.9)%
|
Sources:
Smith
Travel Research (2004 to 2008); PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009).
2009 data is as of January 2009.
3
The lodging industry generally can be divided into four main
segments: (i) luxury; (ii) upscale, which also
includes upper upscale properties; (iii) midscale, which is
often further sub-divided into midscale with food and beverage
and midscale without food and beverage; and (iv) economy.
Luxury and upscale hotels typically offer a full range of
on-property amenities and services including restaurants, spas,
recreational facilities, business centers, concierges, room
service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport,
local attractions and shopping). Midscale segment properties
typically offer limited breakfast service, vending, selected
business services, partial recreational facilities (either a
pool or fitness equipment) and limited transportation (airport
shuttle). Economy properties typically offer a limited breakfast
and airport shuttle. The following table sets forth the
information on ADR and operating statistics for each segment and
associated subsegments for 2009:
Chain
Scale Segment Forecast 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
2009E
|
|
2009E Change
|
|
2009E
|
|
2009E
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Change in
|
|
in Avg. Room
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
Segment
|
|
Room Rate (ADR)
|
|
Demand
|
|
Avg. Room Supply
|
|
Occupancy %
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
Luxury
|
|
Greater than $210
|
|
|
(5.7)%
|
|
|
5.4 %
|
|
|
(10.5)%
|
|
|
(6.9)%
|
|
|
(16.7)%
|
Upper upscale
|
|
$125 to $210
|
|
|
(5.2)%
|
|
|
2.4 %
|
|
|
(7.4)%
|
|
|
(6.1)%
|
|
|
(13.0)%
|
Upscale
|
|
$95 to $125
|
|
|
(1.2)%
|
|
|
5.5 %
|
|
|
(6.3)%
|
|
|
(5.8)%
|
|
|
(11.8)%
|
Midscale with food-and-beverage
|
|
Less than $95
|
|
|
(10.0)%
|
|
|
(4.1)%
|
|
|
(6.1)%
|
|
|
(5.4)%
|
|
|
(11.2)%
|
Midscale without Food-and-beverage
|
|
Greater than $65
|
|
|
(1.2)%
|
|
|
4.7 %
|
|
|
(5.6)%
|
|
|
(3.7)%
|
|
|
(9.1)%
|
Economy
|
|
Less than $65
|
|
|
(5.6)%
|
|
|
0.9 %
|
|
|
(6.4)%
|
|
|
(3.8)%
|
|
|
(10.0)%
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5)%
|
|
|
2.1 %
|
|
|
(6.4)%
|
|
|
(5.2)%
|
|
|
(11.2)%
|
Sources:
Smith
Travel Research (Estimated Average Daily Room Rate (ADR));
PricewaterhouseCoopers (Operating Statistics). 2009 data is as
of January 2009.
Typically, companies in the lodging industry operate under one
or more of the following three business models:
|
|
|
Franchise.
Under the franchise model, a company typically
grants the use of a brand name to owners of hotels that the
company neither owns nor manages in exchange for royalty fees
that are typically equal to a percentage of room sales. Owners
of independent hotels increasingly have been affiliating their
hotels with national lodging franchise brands as a means to
remain competitive. In 2008, the share of hotel rooms in the
United States affiliated with a national lodging franchise brand
was approximately 68%.
|
|
|
Management.
Under the management model, a company
provides hotel management services to lodging properties that it
owns
and/or
lodging properties owned by a third party in exchange for
management fees, which may include incentive fees based on the
financial performance of the properties.
|
|
|
Ownership.
Under the ownership model, a company owns
properties and therefore benefits financially from hotel
revenues and any appreciation in the value of the properties.
|
Wyndham
Hotel Group Overview
Wyndham Hotel Group, our lodging business, franchises hotels in
the upscale, midscale, and economy segments of the lodging
industry and provides hotel management services to owners of
luxury, upscale and midscale hotels. Through steady organic
growth and acquisition of established lodging franchise systems
over the past 18 years, our lodging business has become the
worlds largest lodging franchisor as measured by the
number of franchised hotels. Our lodging business has over 7,000
franchised hotels, which represents almost 593,000 rooms on six
continents (including over 4,000 rooms from 14 unmanaged,
affiliated and managed, non-proprietary hotels). Our lodging
business has a strong presence across the economy and midscale
segments of the lodging industry and a developing presence in
the upscale segment, thus providing individual consumers who are
traveling for leisure or business with options across various
price points. Our franchised hotels operate under one of our
lodging brands, which are Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Wingate by
Wyndham, Hawthorn, Ramada, Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8, Microtel,
Howard Johnson, Travelodge and Knights Inn. The breadth and
diversity of our lodging brands provide potential franchisees
with a range of options for affiliating their properties with
one or more of our brands. As of December 31, 2008, our
franchised hotels represented approximately 10.2% of
U.S. hotel room inventory.
In 2008, our franchised hotels sold 8.5% or approximately
86.2 million, of the one billion hotel room nights sold in
the United States. In 2008, our franchised hotels sold
approximately 19.7% of all hotel room nights sold in the United
States in the economy and midscale segments. Our franchised
hotels are dispersed internationally, which reduces our exposure
to any one geographic region. Approximately 79% of the hotel
rooms, or over 470,000 rooms, in our franchised hotels are
located throughout the United States, and approximately 21% of
the hotel rooms, or approximately 123,000 rooms, are located
outside of the United States. In addition, our franchise systems
are
4
dispersed among numerous franchisees, which reduces our exposure
to any one lodging franchisee. Of our approximately
6,100 lodging franchisees, no one franchisee accounts for
more than 2% of our franchised hotels. Our lodging business
franchises under two models. In North America, we generally
employ a direct franchise model whereby we contract with and
provide services and assistance with reservations directly to
independent owner-operators of hotels. In other parts of the
world, we employ either a direct franchise model or a master
franchise model whereby we contract with a qualified,
experienced third party to build a franchise enterprise in such
third partys country or region.
Our lodging business provides our franchised hotels with a suite
of operational and administrative services, including access to
a central reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing. We also provide our franchisees, as well as
our managed hotels, with the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program,
which is the worlds largest hotel rewards program as
measured by the number of participating hotels. As of
December 31, 2008, we were providing hotel management
services to 34 hotels associated with either the Wyndham Hotels
and Resorts brand, the Ramada brand or the CHI joint venture.
Our hotel management business offers owners of hotels
professional oversight and comprehensive operations support.
Our lodging business derives the majority of its revenues from
franchising hotels. The sources of revenues from franchising
hotels are initial franchise fees, which relate to services
provided to assist a franchised hotel to open for business under
one of our brands, and ongoing franchise fees, which are
comprised of royalty fees, marketing and reservation fees and
other related fees. The royalty fees are intended to cover the
use of our trademarks and our operating expenses, such as
expenses incurred for franchise services, including quality
assurance and administrative support, and to provide us with
operating profits. The marketing and reservation fees are
intended to reimburse us for expenses associated with operating
a central reservations system, advertising and marketing
programs and other related services. Because franchise fees
generally are based on percentages of the franchisees
gross room revenues, expanding our portfolio of franchised
hotels and growing RevPAR at franchised hotels are important to
our revenue growth.
We also earn revenue providing hotel management services, which
revenues include management fees, service fees and reimbursement
revenues. Our management fees are comprised of base fees, which
typically are calculated based upon a specified percentage of
gross revenues from hotel operations, and incentive fees, which
typically are calculated based upon a specified percentage of a
hotels gross operating profit. Service fees include fees
derived from accounting, design, construction and purchasing
services and technical assistance provided to managed hotels.
Reimbursement revenues are intended to cover expenses incurred
by the hotel management business on behalf of the managed
hotels, primarily consisting of payroll costs for operational
employees who work at the hotels. We also earn revenue from the
Wyndham Rewards program when a member stays at a participating
hotel. These revenues are derived from a fee charged to the
franchisee/managed property owner based upon a percentage of
room revenue generated from such stay.
Lodging
Brands
Our widely-known lodging brands are (hotel and room data as of
December 31, 2008):
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts.
The Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand was founded in 1981, and we acquired the brand in
2005. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts serves the upscale segment of
the lodging industry with 82 hotels and 21,724 rooms located in
the United States, the Caribbean, Mexico, the United Kingdom,
Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Portugal, Russia, Libya, and
Canada. There are also 9 hotels and 3,145 rooms located in
Mexico that are affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts offers signature programs,
which include: Wyndham ByRequest, a guest recognition program
that provides returning guests with personalized accommodations
and Meetings ByRequest, which is designed to help groups plan
meetings and features
24-hour
turnaround on all correspondence between the groups
meeting planner and Wyndhams meetings manager, Internet
connectivity and catering options.
|
|
|
Wingate by Wyndham.
We created and launched the Wingate
Inn brand in 1995 and opened the first hotel a year later. We
renamed the Wingate Inn brand to Wingate by Wyndham in 2007. The
all-new-construction Wingate by Wyndham brand serves the upper
midscale segment of the lodging industry and franchises 164
hotels with 15,051 rooms located in the United States, Canada
and Mexico. Wingate by Wyndham hotels currently offer
all-inclusive pricing that includes the price of the room;
complimentary wired and wireless high-speed Internet access,
faxes and photocopies, deluxe continental breakfast, local calls
and access for long-distance calls, and access to a
24-hour
self-service business center equipped with computers with
high-speed Internet access, a fax, a photocopier and a printer.
Each hotel features a boardroom and meeting rooms with
high-speed Internet access, a fitness room with a whirlpool and,
at most locations, a swimming pool. Wingate by Wyndham hotels
currently do not offer food and beverage services.
|
5
|
|
|
Ramada Worldwide.
The Ramada brand was founded in 1954.
We licensed the United States and Canadian trademark rights to
the Ramada brand prior to acquiring the rights in 2002 and
acquired the ownership rights to the brand on a worldwide basis
in 2004. The Ramada brand serves the midscale and upscale
segments of the lodging industry in the United States, Germany,
the United Kingdom, Canada, China and other international
regions. In North America, we serve the midscale segment through
Ramada, Ramada Hotel, Ramada Plaza and Ramada Limited, and
internationally we serve the midscale and upscale segments of
the lodging industry through Ramada Resort, Ramada Hotel and
Resort, Ramada Hotel and Suites, Ramada Plaza and Ramada Encore.
Ramada Worldwide franchises 897 hotels with 114,986 rooms
globally.
|
|
|
Baymont Franchise Systems.
Founded in 1976 under the
Budgetel Inns brands, the system was converted in 1999 to the
Baymont Inn & Suites brand. We acquired the brand in
April 2006. Baymont Franchise Systems primarily serves the
midscale segment of the lodging industry and franchises 227
hotels with 19,090 rooms located in the United States. Following
the closing of our acquisition of the franchise business of
Baymont Inn & Suites, we announced our intent to
consolidate the AmeriHost-branded properties with our newly
acquired Baymont-branded properties to create a more significant
midscale brand. This consolidation is expected to be completed
by the end of the first quarter 2009. Baymont Inn &
Suites rooms feature oversized desks, ergonomic chairs and task
lamps, voicemail, free local calls, in-room coffee maker, iron
and ironing board, hair dryer and shampoo, television with
premium channels,
pay-per-view
movies
and/or
satellite movies and video games. Most locations feature
high-speed Internet access, a swimming pool, airport shuttle
service and a fitness center. Baymont hotels currently do not
offer food and beverage services.
|
|
|
Days Inns Worldwide.
The Days Inn brand was created by
Cecil B. Day in 1970, when the lodging industry consisted of
only a dozen national brands. We acquired the brand in 1992.
Days Inns Worldwide serves the upper economy segment of the
lodging industry with 1,880 hotels with 152,971 rooms in the
United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom and other
international regions. In the United States, we serve the upper
economy segment of the lodging industry through Days Inn, Days
Hotel and Days Suites, and internationally, we serve the upper
economy segment of the lodging industry through Days Hotels,
Days Inn and Days Serviced Apartments. Many properties offer
on-site
restaurants, lounges, meeting rooms, banquet facilities,
exercise centers and a complimentary continental breakfast and
newspaper each morning. Each Days Suites room provides separate
living and sleeping areas, with a telephone and television in
each area. Each Days Inn Business Place room currently offers
high-intensity lighting, a large desk, a microwave/refrigerator
unit, a coffeemaker, an iron and ironing board, and snacks and
beverages.
|
|
|
Super 8 Worldwide.
The first motel operating under the
Super 8 brand opened in October 1974. We acquired the brand in
1993. Super 8 serves the economy segment of the lodging
industry. Super 8 franchises 2,110 hotels with 130,920 rooms
located in the United States, Canada and China. Super 8 hotels
currently provide complimentary continental breakfast.
Participating motels currently allow pets and offer local calls
for free, fax and copy services, microwaves, suites, guest
laundry, exercise facilities, cribs, rollaway beds and pools.
|
|
|
Microtel Inns & Suites.
The first Microtel Inns
opened in 1996. We acquired the brand in July 2008. Microtel
Inns & Suites has been ranked highest in guest
satisfaction among economy/budget hotel chains in the J.D. Power
and Associates 2008 North America Hotel Guest Satisfaction Index
Study
sm
.
Microtel is the only economy/budget brand in the hotel industry
to have received this recognition seven successive times.
Microtel serves the economy segment of the lodging industry.
Microtel franchises 308 hotels with 22,106 rooms located in the
United States and select international regions, including the
Philippines. These hotels feature free local and long-distance
phone calls within the continental United States, high-speed
wired and wireless Internet access, expanded cable television,
in-room coffeemaker and continental breakfast.
|
|
|
Howard Johnson International.
The Howard Johnson brand
was founded in 1925 by entrepreneur Howard Dearing Johnson as an
ice cream stand within an apothecary shop and the first hotel
operating under the brand opened in 1954. We acquired the brand
in 1990. Howard Johnson serves the midscale segment of the
lodging industry through Howard Johnson Plaza and Howard Johnson
Hotel and the economy segment of the lodging industry through
Howard Johnson Inn and Howard Johnson Express. Howard Johnson
franchises 482 hotels with 47,177 rooms located in the United
States, China, Mexico and other international regions.
Participating hotels offer standard business amenities, a
25-inch
television and free access for long-distance calls.
|
|
|
Hawthorn Suites.
The Hawthorn chain was founded in 1983.
We acquired the brand in July 2008. Hawthorn offers
complimentary hot breakfast buffet, kitchen facilities, separate
sleeping and living areas, and free high-speed and wireless
Internet access. All Hawthorn Suites hotels feature a designated
number of rooms that have enhanced features for travelers with
disabilities. Hawthorn serves the midscale segment by
|
6
|
|
|
offering an extended stay product. Hawthorn franchises 90 hotels
with 8,423 rooms in the United States and select international
regions, including the United Arab Emirates.
|
|
|
|
Travelodge Hotels.
In 1935, founder Scott King
established his first motor court operating under the Travelodge
brand. We acquired the brand (in North America only) in 1996.
Travelodge Hotels franchises 479 hotels with 36,154 rooms
located in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Travelodge
Hotels serves the economy segment of the lodging industry in the
United States through Travelodge, Travelodge Suites and
Thriftlodge hotels.
|
|
|
Knights Franchise Systems.
The Knights Inn brand was
created in 1972. We acquired the brand in 1995. Knights
Franchise Systems serves the lower economy segment of the
lodging industry with 301 hotels with 19,542 rooms located in
the United States and Canada.
|
System
Performance and Distribution
The following table provides operating statistics for our brands
and for unmanaged, affiliated and managed non-proprietary
hotels. The table includes information as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2008. We derived occupancy, ADR and
RevPAR from information we received from our franchisees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
Daily Rate
|
|
|
Room
|
|
Brand
|
|
Segment
Served
(1)
|
|
Per Property
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
(2)
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(ADR)
|
|
|
(RevPAR)
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
21,724
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
120.79
|
|
|
$
|
73.67
|
|
Wingate by Wyndham
|
|
Upper Midscale
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
15,051
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
92.29
|
|
|
$
|
54.94
|
|
Hawthorn
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
8,423
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
88.57
|
|
|
$
|
51.14
|
|
Ramada
|
|
Upscale & Midscale
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
114,986
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
81.62
|
|
|
$
|
42.94
|
|
Baymont
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
19,090
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
65.96
|
|
|
$
|
32.80
|
|
AmeriHost Inn
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
47.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
69.87
|
|
|
$
|
33.47
|
|
Days Inn
|
|
Upper Economy
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
152,971
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
64.57
|
|
|
$
|
32.19
|
|
Super 8
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
130,920
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
59.38
|
|
|
$
|
31.95
|
|
Howard Johnson
|
|
Midscale & Economy
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
47,177
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
64.62
|
|
|
$
|
30.28
|
|
Travelodge
|
|
Upper & Lower Economy
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
36,154
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
67.50
|
|
|
$
|
32.64
|
|
Microtel
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
22,106
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
32.55
|
|
Knights Inn
|
|
Lower Economy
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
19,542
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
43.40
|
|
|
$
|
17.80
|
|
Unmanaged, Affiliated and Managed, Non-Proprietary
|
|
Luxury & Upper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotels
(3)
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4,175
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
69.52
|
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The economy segments
discussed here, while included in the Smith Travel Research
chain-scale Economy segment represented in the table on
page 4 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
provide a greater degree of differentiation to correspond with
the price sensitivities of our customers by brand. The
midscale segment discussed here encompasses both the
Smith Travel Research midscale without food and
beverage and midscale with food and beverage
segments.
|
(2)
|
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
(3)
|
|
Represents (i) properties
affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which
we receive a fee for reservation and/or other services provided
and (ii) properties managed under the CHI Limited joint
venture. These properties are not branded; as such, certain
operating statistics (such as average occupancy rate, ADR and
RevPAR) are not relevant.
|
7
The following table provides a summary description of our system
size (including managed non-proprietary hotels) by geographic
region as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Revenue
|
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
|
Per Available
|
|
Region
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
(1)
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
|
Room (RevPAR)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
6,015
|
|
|
|
470,197
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
65.25
|
|
|
$
|
32.79
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
36,754
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
93.05
|
|
|
$
|
53.01
|
|
Europe
(2)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
28,924
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
94.80
|
|
|
$
|
58.13
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
36,510
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
54.81
|
|
|
$
|
28.64
|
|
Latin/South America
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
13,621
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
90.62
|
|
|
$
|
45.10
|
|
Middle East/Africa
(2)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
6,874
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
106.97
|
|
|
$
|
64.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
69.52
|
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
(2)
|
|
Europe and Middle East include
affiliated properties/rooms and properties/rooms managed under
the CHI Limited joint venture. Some of these properties are not
branded; as such, certain operating statistics (such as average
occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR) are not relevant and, therefore,
have not been reflected in the table.
|
Franchise
Development
Under our direct franchise model, we principally market our
lodging brands to independent hotel owners and to hotel owners
who have the right to terminate their franchise affiliations
with other lodging brands. We also market franchises under our
lodging brands to existing franchisees because many own, or may
own in the future, other hotels that can be converted to one of
our brands. Under our master franchise model, we principally
market our lodging brands to third parties that assume the
principal role of franchisor, which entails selling individual
franchise agreements and providing quality assurance, marketing
and reservations support to franchisees. As part of our
franchise development strategy, we employ national and
international sales forces that we compensate in part through
commissions. Because of the importance of existing franchised
hotels performance to our sales strategy, a significant
part of our franchise development efforts is to ensure that our
franchisees provide quality services to maintain the
satisfaction of customers.
Franchise
Agreements
Our standard franchise agreement grants a franchisee the right
to non-exclusive use of the applicable franchise system in the
operation of a single hotel at a specified location, typically
for a period of 15 to 20 years, and gives the franchisor
and franchisee certain rights to terminate the franchise
agreement before the conclusion of the term of the agreement
under certain circumstances, such as upon designated
anniversaries of the franchised hotels opening or the date
of the agreement. Early termination options in franchise
agreements give us flexibility to eliminate or re-brand
franchised hotels if such properties become weak performers,
even if there is no contractual failure by the franchisee. We
also have the right to terminate a franchise agreement for
failure by a franchisee to (i) bring its properties into
compliance with contractual or quality standards within
specified periods of time, (ii) pay required franchise fees
or (iii) comply with other requirements of its franchise
agreement.
Master franchise agreements, which are individually negotiated
and vary among our different brands, typically contain
provisions that permit us to terminate the agreement if the
other party to the agreement fails to meet specified development
schedules. The terms of our master franchise agreements
generally are competitive with industry averages within industry
segments.
Sales and
Marketing of Hotel Rooms
We use the marketing fees that our franchisees pay to us to
promote our brands through media advertising, direct marketing,
direct sales, promotions and publicity. A portion of the funds
contributed by the franchisees of any one particular brand is
used to promote that brand, whereas the remainder of the funds
is allocated to support the cost of multibrand promotional
efforts and to our marketing and global sales team, which
includes, among others, our worldwide sales, public relations
and direct marketing teams.
Our public relations team extends the reach and frequency of our
paid advertising by generating extensive, free exposure for our
brands in trade and consumer media including
USA TODAY
,
The New York Times, Lodging Hospitality, Hotel/Motel
Management
and other widely-read publications.
8
Central
Reservations and Internet Bookings
In 2008, we booked on behalf of our franchised and managed
hotels approximately 3.5 million rooms by telephone,
approximately 13.3 million rooms through the Internet and
approximately 2.4 million rooms through global distribution
systems, with a combined value of approximately
$1.5 billion in bookings. Additionally, our global sales
team generated leads for bookings from group and meeting
planners, tour operators, travel agents, government and military
clients, and corporate and small business accounts. We maintain
contact centers in Saint John and Fredericton, New Brunswick,
Canada; Aberdeen, South Dakota; and Manila, Philippines that
handle bookings generated through our toll-free brand numbers.
We maintain numerous brand websites to process online room
reservations, and we utilize global distribution systems to
process reservations generated by travel agents and third-party
Internet booking sources, including Orbitz.com, Hotwire.com,
Travelocity.com, Expedia.com, Hotels.com and Priceline.com. To
ensure we receive bookings by travel agents and third-party
Internet booking sources, we also provide direct connections
between our central reservations system and some third-party
Internet booking sources. The majority of hotel room nights are
sold by our franchisees to guests who seek accommodations on a
walk-in basis or through calls made directly to hotels, which we
believe is attributable in part to the strength of our lodging
brands and loyalty program. Through our various channels such as
telephone, Internet, loyalty program and global distribution
systems, we booked approximately 33% of the total systems
gross room revenues on behalf of our franchised and managed
hotels.
Since 2004, bookings made directly by customers on our brand
websites have been increasing at a CAGR (over the five year
period) of approximately 16%, and increased to over
7.6 million room nights per year in 2008. Since 2004,
bookings made through third-party Internet booking sources
increased at a CAGR (over the five year period) of approximately
11% while bookings made through global distribution systems
increased at a CAGR (over the five year period) of approximately
3%.
Loyalty
Programs
The Wyndham Rewards program, which was introduced in 2003, has
grown steadily to become the lodging industrys largest
loyalty program as measured by the number of participating
hotels. As of December 31, 2008, there were over 6,000
hotels participating in the program. With over 40 other partners
participating in the program, Wyndham Rewards offers its members
several options to accumulate points. Members, for example, may
accumulate points by staying in hotels franchised under one of
our brands or by purchasing everyday products and services from
the various businesses that participate in the program. When
staying at hotels franchised under one of our brands, Wyndham
Rewards members may elect to earn airline miles or rail points
instead of Wyndham Rewards points. Businesses where points can
be earned generally pay a fee to participate in the program;
such fees are then used to support the programs marketing
and operating expenses. Wyndham Rewards members have over 400
options to redeem their points. Members, for example, may redeem
their points for hotel stays, airline tickets, resort vacations,
electronics, sporting goods, movie and theme park tickets, and
gift certificates. As of December 31, 2008, Wyndham Rewards
had more than 7.6 million active members, which we define
as any customer who has enrolled, earned or redeemed in the
Wyndham Rewards program over the past 18 months, and the
program added approximately 320,000 members per month in 2008.
Hotel
Management Services
As of December 31, 2008, our lodging business was providing
hotel management services to 34 properties associated with
either the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand or the CHI joint
venture. Our hotel management business offers owners of hotels
professional oversight and comprehensive operations support,
including hiring, training, purchasing, revenue management,
sales and marketing, food and beverage services and financial
analysis. Our management fee is generally based on a percentage
of each hotels gross revenue plus, in the majority of
properties, an incentive fee based on operating performance. The
terms of our management agreements vary based on the unique
nature of each agreement. In general, under our management
agreements, all operating and other expenses are paid by the
owner and we are reimbursed for our out-of-pocket expenses.
Strategies
We intend to continue to accelerate growth of our lodging
business by (i) focusing resources on key markets;
(ii) aligning franchisee-facing functions and strengthening
our owner and guest value propositions through exceptional
customer service; and (iii) promoting more efficient
channel management to further drive revenue to our franchised
locations and managed properties. Our plans generally focus on
pursuing these strategies organically.
Global
Room Growth
Our strategy for achieving global room growth reflects a focused
approach. We intend to grow our upscale and midscale brands in
North America while continuing to maintain our leadership
position in the economy segment. We
9
also intend to concentrate our efforts for international growth
on certain key growth markets including the UK, Germany, China,
India, Mexico and the Caribbean, where we will deploy both
direct and master franchising models, management agreements and
joint venture models where appropriate. We will optimize system
growth by strategically adding franchised hotels in markets
where certain of our brands are underrepresented and also by
targeting key locations for our Wyndham brand. We will continue
to complement the Wingate by Wyndham product with Wyndham brand
recognition and also intend to pursue a similar endorsement
strategy for the Hawthorn brand. We may, at our discretion,
provide development advances to certain of our franchisees or
property owners in our managed business in order to assist such
franchisees/property owners in converting to one of our brands,
building a new hotel to be flagged under one of our brands or in
assisting in other franchisee expansion efforts.
Customer
Service
Our customer service strategy is focused on increasing our
franchisee and consumer value proposition. To further optimize
our franchisee customer service, we will continue to coordinate
and align all franchisee-facing functions, including our
franchisee services, quality assurance and training departments.
We will continue to increase our consumer value proposition by
improving the customer experience through ongoing training
enhancements.
Revenue
Generation
In order to continue to drive revenue to our owners, we will
further capitalize upon our expertise in revenue generating
areas, including
e-commerce,
revenue management and group sales. By consolidating all of our
e-commerce
expertise, we will optimize our existing brand websites and
e-commerce
platforms, while developing business-building online marketing
campaigns. Our revenue management services add value to our
franchisees by improving rate and inventory management
capabilities, while our group sales team will be singularly
focused on driving group business to our properties.
Seasonality
Franchise and management fees are generally higher in the second
and third quarters than in the first or fourth quarters of any
calendar year. Because of increased leisure travel and the
related ability to charge higher ADRs during the spring and
summer months, hotels we franchise or manage typically generate
higher revenue during these months. Therefore, any occurrence
that disrupts travel patterns during the spring or summer could
have a greater adverse effect on the annual performance of our
franchised hotels and managed properties and consequently on our
results. We do not currently expect any change to these seasonal
trends.
Competition
Competition is robust among the national lodging brand
franchisors to grow their franchise systems. The lodging
companies that we primarily compete with in the upscale and
midscale segments include Marriott International Inc., Hilton
Hotels Corporation, Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide, Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc.,
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC and Global Hyatt Corporation.
The lodging companies that we primarily compete with in the
economy segment include Choice Hotels International, Inc.,
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, Accor SA and Best Western.
We believe that competition for the sales of franchises in the
lodging industry is based principally upon the perceived value
and quality of the brands and the services offered to
franchisees. We believe that the perceived value of a brand name
to prospective franchisees is, to some extent, a function of the
success of the existing hotels franchised under the brands. We
believe that prospective franchisees value a franchise based
upon their views of the relationship between the costs,
including costs of conversion and affiliation, to the benefits,
including potential for increased revenue and profitability, and
upon the reputation of the franchisor.
The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be
affected by the location and quality of its property, the number
of competing properties in the vicinity, community reputation
and other factors. A franchisees success may also be
affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The
potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of
operations is substantially reduced by virtue of the diverse
geographical locations of our franchised hotels; however, any
economic downturn affecting all of the United States could limit
the benefits from this geographic diversity.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,
Wingate by Wyndham, Ramada,
Baymont, Hawthorn, Days Inn,
Super 8, Microtel, Howard
Johnson, AmeriHost Inn, Travelodge
(in North America only), Knights Inn, Wyndham
Rewards and related trademarks and logos. Such trademarks
and logos are material to the businesses that are part of our
lodging business. Our franchisees and our subsidiaries actively
use
10
these marks, and all of the material marks are registered (or
have applications pending) with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office as well as with the relevant authorities in
major countries worldwide where these businesses have
significant operations.
GROUP
RCI
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals Industry Overview
The estimated $44 billion global vacation exchange and
rentals industry has been a growing segment of the hospitality
industry. Industry providers offer products and services to both
leisure travelers and vacation property owners, including owners
of second homes and vacation ownership interests. The vacation
exchange and rentals industry offers leisure travelers access to
a range of fully-furnished vacation properties, which include
privately-owned vacation homes, apartments and condominiums,
vacation ownership resorts, inventory at hotels and resorts,
villas, cottages, boats and yachts. Providers offer leisure
travelers flexibility (subject to availability) as to time of
travel and a choice of lodging options in regions to which such
travelers may not typically have ease of access to such choices.
For vacation property owners, affiliations with vacation
exchange companies allow such owners to exchange their interests
in vacation properties for vacation time at other properties or
for other various products and services. Additionally,
affiliation with vacation rental companies provides property
owners the ability to have their properties marketed and rented,
as desired and, in some instances, to transfer the
responsibility of managing such properties.
The vacation exchange industry provides to owners of intervals
flexibility through vacation exchanges. Companies that offer
vacation exchange services include, among others RCI (our global
vacation exchange business and the worlds largest vacation
exchange network), Interval Leisure Group, Inc. (a third-party
exchange company), and numerous smaller companies, some of which
are solely internet based. In addition, some companies that
develop vacation ownership resorts and market vacation ownership
interests offer exchanges through internal networks of
properties. To participate in a vacation exchange, an owner
generally contributes intervals to an exchange companys
network and then indicates the particular resort or geographic
area to which the owner would like to travel, the size of the
unit desired and the period during which the owner would like to
vacation. The exchange company then rates the owners
contributed intervals based upon a number of factors, including
the location and size of the unit or units, the quality of the
resort or resorts and the time period or periods during which
the intervals entitle the owner to vacation. The exchange
company then generally offers the owner a vacation with a
comparable rating to the vacation that the owner contributed.
Exchange companies generally derive revenues from owners of
intervals by charging exchange fees for facilitating exchanges
and through annual membership dues. In 2007, 78% of owners of
intervals were members of vacation exchange companies, and
approximately three-fifths of such owners exchanged their
intervals through such exchange companies.
The overall trend in the vacation exchange industry has been
growth in the number of members of vacation exchange companies.
We believe that current economic conditions will result in
slower growth in the near term, but believe that the longer term
trends will support a return to stronger growth. Longer term, we
believe one factor supporting growth in the vacation exchange
industry will be growth in the premium and luxury segments of
the vacation ownership industry through the increased sales of
vacation ownership interests at high-end luxury resorts and the
development of vacation ownership properties and products around
the world. In 2007, there were approximately 6.2 million
members industry-wide who completed approximately
3.6 million exchanges. We believe that existing trends
within the vacation exchange industry reflect that timeshare
vacation ownership developers are enrolling members in private
label clubs, whereby the members have the option to exchange
within the club or through external exchange channels. Such
trends have a positive impact on the average number of members,
but an opposite effect on the number of exchange transactions
per average member and revenue per member.
The vacation rental industry offers vacation property owners the
opportunity to rent their properties to leisure travelers for
periods of time when the properties are unoccupied. The vacation
rental industry is not as organized as the lodging industry in
that the vacation rental industry, we believe, has no vacation
rental-specific global reservation systems or brands. The global
supply of vacation rental inventory is highly fragmented with
much of it being made available by individual property owners.
Although these owners sometimes rent their properties directly,
vacation rental companies often assist in renting owners
properties without the benefit of globally recognized brands or
international marketing and reservation systems. Typically,
vacation rental companies collect rent in advance and, after
deducting the applicable commissions, remit the net amounts due
to the property owners
and/or
property managers. In addition to commissions, vacation rental
companies earn revenues from rental customers through fees that
are incidental to the rental of the properties, such as fees for
travel services, local transportation,
on-site
services and insurance or similar types of products.
We believe that as of December 31, 2008, there were
approximately 1.3 million and 1.7 million vacation
properties available for rental in the United States and Europe,
respectively. In the United States, the vacation properties
available for rental are primarily condominiums or stand-alone
houses. In Europe, the vacation properties
11
available for rental include individual homes and apartments,
campsites and vacation park bungalows. Individual owners of
vacation properties in the United States and Europe may own
their properties as investments and may sometimes use such
properties for portions of the year.
We believe that the overall demand for vacation rentals has been
growing for the following reasons: (i) the availability of
lower-cost and flexible transportation options; (ii) the
increased use of the Internet as a tool for facilitating
vacation rental transactions; (iii) the emergence of
attractive, low-cost destinations, such as Eastern Europe; and
(iv) increasing awareness of vacation rental options among
Americans. The demand per year for vacation rentals in Europe
and the United States is approximately 48 million vacation
weeks, 28 million of which are rented by leisure travelers
from Europe. Demand for vacation rental properties is often
regional in that leisure travelers who rent properties often
live relatively close to such properties. Some leisure
travelers, however, travel relatively long distances from their
homes to vacation properties in domestic or international
destinations. We believe that current economic conditions will
result in slower growth in the near term, but believe that the
longer term trends will support a return to stronger growth.
The destinations where leisure travelers from Europe, the United
States, South Africa and Australia generally rent properties
vary by country of origin of the leisure travelers. Leisure
travelers from Europe generally rent properties in European
destinations, including Spain, France, the United Kingdom, Italy
and Portugal. Demand from European leisure travelers has
recently been shifting beyond traditional Western Europe, based
on political stability across Europe, increased accessibility of
Eastern Europe and the expansion of the European Union. Demand
by leisure travelers from the United States is focused on
rentals in seaside destinations, such as Hawaii, Florida and the
Carolinas, in ski destinations such as the Rocky Mountains, and
in urban centers such as Las Vegas, Nevada; San Francisco,
California; and New York City. Demand is also growing for
destinations in Mexico and the Caribbean by leisure travelers
from the United States.
We believe that the overall supply of vacation rental properties
has grown primarily because of the increasing desire by existing
owners of second homes to gain an earnings stream evidenced by
homes not previously rented appearing on the market.
Group RCI
Overview
Group RCI, our vacation exchange and rentals business, provides
vacation exchange products and services to developers, managers
and owners of intervals of vacation ownership interests, and
markets vacation rental properties. We are the worlds
largest vacation exchange network and among the worlds
largest global marketers of vacation rental properties. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business has access for specified
periods, in a majority of cases on an exclusive basis, to over
73,000 vacation properties, which are comprised of over 4,000
vacation ownership resorts around the world through our vacation
exchange business and almost 69,000 vacation rental properties
that are located principally in Europe, which we believe makes
us one of the worlds largest marketers of European
vacation rental properties as measured by the number of
properties we market for rental. Each year, our vacation
exchange and rentals business provides more than four million
leisure-bound families with vacation exchange and rentals
products and services. The properties available to leisure
travelers through our vacation exchange and rentals business
include hotel rooms and suites, houses, villas, cottages,
bungalows, campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city
apartments, fractional private residences, luxury destination
clubs and yachts. We offer leisure travelers flexibility
(subject to availability) as to time of travel and a choice of
lodging options in regions to which such travelers may not
typically have such ease of access, and we offer property owners
marketing services, quality control services and property
management services ranging from key-holding to full property
maintenance for such properties. Our vacation exchange and
rentals business has approximately 60 worldwide offices. We
market our products and services using eight primary consumer
brands and other related brands.
Throughout this document, we use the term inventory
in the context of our vacation exchange and rentals business to
refer to intervals of vacation ownership interests and primarily
independently owned properties, which include hotel rooms and
suites, houses, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds,
vacation ownership condominiums, city apartments, fractional
private residences, luxury destination clubs and yachts. In
addition, throughout this document, we refer to intervals of
vacation ownership interests as intervals and
individuals who purchase vacation rental products and services
from us as rental customers.
Our vacation exchange and rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees. Our vacation exchange business, RCI, derives
a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues and
exchange fees for facilitating transactions. Our vacation
exchange business also derives revenues from ancillary services,
including additional services provided to transacting members,
programs with affiliated resorts, club servicing, travel agency
services and loyalty programs. Our vacation rentals business
primarily derives its revenues from fees, which generally
average between 20% and 45% of the gross booking fees for
non-proprietary inventory, as compared to properties that we own
or operate under long-term capital leases where we receive 100%
of the revenue. Our vacation rentals business also derives
revenues from ancillary services delivered
on-site
for
owned and managed properties. The revenues
12
generated in our vacation exchange and rentals business are
substantially derived from the direct customer relationships we
have with our 3.8 million vacation exchange members, our
nearly 45,000 independent property owners and the affiliated
developers of more than 4,000 resorts. No one customer, customer
group or developer accounts for more than 4% of our vacation
exchange and rentals revenues.
Vacation
Exchange
Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have
relationships with over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in
approximately 100 countries. Our primary vacation exchange
business consists of the operation of worldwide exchange
programs for owners of intervals. In addition, our vacation
exchange business provides consulting services for the
development of tourism-oriented real estate, loyalty programs,
in-house travel agency services, and third-party vacation club
services.
We operate our vacation exchange business, RCI, through three
worldwide exchange programs that have a member base of vacation
owners who are generally well-traveled and who want flexibility
and variety in their travel plans each year. Our vacation
exchange business three exchange programs, which serve
owners of intervals at affiliated resorts, are RCI Weeks, RCI
Points and The Registry Collection. Participants in these
exchange programs pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services. We refer to participants in these three exchange
programs as members. In addition, the
Endless
Vacation
®
magazine is the official travel publication of our RCI Weeks and
RCI Points exchange programs, and certain members can obtain the
benefits of participation in our RCI Weeks and RCI Points
exchange programs only through a subscription to
Endless
Vacation
magazine. The use of the terms member
or membership with respect to either the RCI Weeks
or RCI Points exchange program is intended to denote
subscription to
Endless Vacation
magazine.
The RCI Weeks exchange program is the worlds largest
vacation ownership exchange network and generally provides
members with flexibility to trade week-long intervals in units
at their resorts for week-long intervals in comparable units at
the same resorts or at comparable resorts.
The RCI Points exchange program, launched in 2000, is a global
points-based exchange network, which allocates points to
intervals that members cede to the exchange program. Under the
RCI Points exchange program, members may redeem their points for
the use of vacation properties in the exchange program or for
other products and services which may change from time to time,
such as airfare, car rentals, cruises, hotels and other
accommodations. When points are redeemed for these other
products and services, our vacation exchange business can recoup
the expense of providing these other products and services by
renting the vacation properties for which the members could have
redeemed their points.
We believe that The Registry Collection exchange program is the
industrys first and largest global exchange network of
luxury vacation accommodations. The luxury vacation
accommodations in The Registry Collections network include
higher-end vacation ownership resorts, fractional ownership
resorts, condo-hotels and yachts. The Registry Collection allows
members to exchange their intervals for the use of other
vacation properties within the network or for other products and
services, such as airfare, car rentals, cruises, hotels and
other accommodations. The members of The Registry Collection
exchange program often own greater than two-week intervals at
affiliated resorts.
We acquire substantially all members of our exchange programs
indirectly. In substantially all cases, an affiliated resort
developer buys the initial term of an RCI membership on behalf
of the consumer when the consumer purchases a vacation interval.
This initial term is generally either 1 or 2 years and
entitles the vacation ownership interval purchaser to receive
periodicals published by RCI and to use the applicable exchange
program for an additional fee. The vacation ownership interval
purchaser generally pays for membership renewals and any
applicable exchange fees for transactions.
Our vacation exchange business also provides consulting services
for the development of tourism-oriented real estate, loyalty
programs, in-house and outsourced travel agency services, and
third-party vacation club services. Our third-party vacation
club business consists of private label exchange clubs that RCI
operates and manages for certain of its larger affiliates.
Approximately 96% of the third-party vacation club members are
points-based.
Our vacation exchange business operates in North America,
Europe, Latin America, the Caribbean, Southern Africa, the Asia
Pacific region and the Middle East and tailors its strategies
and operating plans for each of the geographical environments
where RCI has or seeks to develop a substantial member base.
13
Vacation
Rentals
The rental properties we market are principally privately-owned
villas, cottages, bungalows and apartments that generally belong
to property owners unaffiliated with us. In addition to these
properties, we market inventory from our vacation exchange
business and from other sources. We market rental properties
under proprietary brand names, such as Endless Vacation Rentals
by Wyndham Worldwide, Landal GreenParks, Cottages4You, Novasol,
Cuendet by Wyndham and Canvas Holidays, and through select
private-label arrangements. Most of the rental activity under
our brands takes place in Europe, the United States and Mexico,
although we have the ability to source and rent inventory in
approximately 100 countries. Our vacation rentals business
currently has relationships with nearly 45,000 independent
property owners in 26 countries, including the United States,
United Kingdom, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium,
Italy, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany,
Greece, Austria, Croatia, and certain countries in Eastern
Europe, the Pacific Rim and Latin America. We currently make
more than 1.3 million vacation rental bookings a year. Our
vacation rentals business also has the opportunity to provide
inventory to our 3.8 million vacation exchange members.
Property owners typically enter into one year or multi-year
contracts with our vacation rentals subsidiaries to market the
rental of their properties within our rental portfolio. Our
vacation rentals business also has an ownership interest in, or
capital leases for, approximately 10% of the properties in our
rental portfolio under the Landal GreenParks brand.
Customer
Development
In our vacation exchange business, we affiliate with vacation
ownership developers directly as a result of the efforts of our
in-house sales teams. Affiliated developers typically sign
long-term agreements each with a duration of up to ten years.
Our members are acquired primarily through our affiliated
developers as part of the vacation ownership purchase process.
In our vacation rentals business, we enter into exclusive rental
agreements with property owners and primarily market properties
online and offline to large databases of customers, which
generate repeat bookings. Additional customers are sourced
through bookable websites and offline advertising and
promotions, and through the use of third party travel agencies,
tour operators, and online distribution channels to drive
additional occupancy. We have also developed specific branded
websites, such as EVrentals.com and cottages4you.co.uk, to
promote, sell and inform new customers about vacation rentals.
Given the diversified nature of our rental brands, there is
limited dependence on a single customer group or business
partner.
Loyalty
Program
Our United States vacation exchange business member
loyalty program is RCI Elite Rewards, which offers a branded
credit card, the RCI Elite Rewards credit card. The card allows
members to earn reward points that can be redeemed for items
related to our exchange programs, including annual membership
dues and exchange fees for transactions, and other products
offered by our vacation exchange business or certain third
parties, including airlines and retailers.
Member
and Rental Customer Initiatives
Our vacation exchange and rentals business strives to provide
superior service to members and rental customers through our
call centers and online distribution channels, to offer certain
members and rental customers in Europe, Latin America, Southern
Africa, and the Pacific region one-stop shopping through our
retail travel agency business, and to target current and
prospective members and rental customers through our marketing
efforts.
Call
Centers
Our vacation exchange and rentals business services its members
and rental customers primarily through global call centers. The
requests that we receive at our global call centers are handled
by our vacation guides, who are trained to fulfill our
members and rental customers requests for vacation
exchanges and rentals. When our members and rental
customers primary choices are unavailable in periods of
high demand, our guides offer the next nearest match in order to
fulfill the members and rental customers needs. Call
centers are currently, and are expected to continue to be, a
significant distribution channel and therefore we invest
resources and will continue to do so to ensure that members and
rental customers continue to receive a high level of
personalized customer service through our call centers. We also
continue to improve our capabilities on the Internet as a means
for members and rental customers to transact. See
Internet below.
Internet
Given the interest of some of our members and rental customers
in doing transactions on the Internet, we invest and will
continue to invest in online technologies to ensure that our
members and rental customers receive the same level of service
online that we provide through our call centers. As an example,
we launched enhanced search capabilities for rentals in December
2007 and enhanced search capabilities for RCI Weeks Exchange in
November
14
2008. These capabilities greatly simplify our search process and
make it easier for a member to find an appropriate vacation. As
our online distribution channels improve, members and rental
customers will shift from transacting business through our call
centers to transacting business online, which we expect will
generate cost savings at our call centers. By offering our
members and rental customers the opportunity to transact
business either through our call centers or online, we allow our
members and rental customers to use the distribution channel
with which they are most comfortable. Regardless of the
distribution channel our members and rental customers use, our
goal is member and rental customer satisfaction and retention.
Travel
Agency
We have an established retail travel agency business outside the
United States in such locations as Europe, Latin America,
Southern Africa and the Pacific. In these regions, our travel
agencies provide certain members and rental customers of the
vacation exchange and rentals business with one-stop shopping
for planning vacations. As part of the one-stop shopping, the
travel agencies can arrange for our members and rental
customers transportation, such as flights, ferries and
rental cars. In the United States and Canada, we have entered
into outsourcing agreements, including one agreement with a
former affiliate, to provide our members and rental customers
with travel services.
Marketing
We market to our members and rental customers through the use of
brochures, magazines, direct marketing, such as direct mail and
e-mail,
third-party online distribution channels, tour operators and
travel agencies. Our vacation exchange and rentals business has
over 60 publications involved in the marketing of the business.
RCI publishes
Endless Vacation
magazine, a travel
publication that has a circulation of over 1.8 million. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business also publishes resort
directories and other periodicals related to the vacation and
vacation ownership industry and other travel-related services.
We acquire the rental customers through our direct-to-consumer
marketing, internet marketing and third-party agent marketing
programs. We use our publications not only for marketing, but
also for member and rental customer retention.
Strategies
We intend to grow our vacation exchange and rentals business
profitability by focusing on three core strategies:
(i) optimize and expand our vacation exchange business;
(ii) expand our rentals business; and (iii) enhance
our operating margins. Our plans generally focus on pursuing
these strategies organically. However, in appropriate
circumstances, we will consider opportunities to acquire
businesses, both domestic and international.
Optimize
and Expand Exchange
Our strategy for optimizing and expanding our vacation exchange
business involves moving to more flexible offerings to maintain
our global leadership position in the marketplace. We intend to
accomplish this through enhancements to our base products,
including RCI Weeks and RCI Points, expanding our presence in
the luxury exchange segment via continued focus on The Registry
Collection, and leveraging our extensive member database
(currently over 3.8 million members) and co-marketing
partnerships to drive additional revenue. We also plan to
continue to expand our online capabilities and maximize
efficiencies by driving more exchange transactions to the
Internet. This will improve overall member satisfaction and
leverage our investment in information technology to drive cost
savings. In addition, we intend to enhance our affiliate and
member value propositions by adding new affiliates to our
current portfolio and expanding our current affiliate
relationships, and by improving marketing and communication with
our growing member base. Finally, in order to provide member
access to inventory to fuel transactions, we will work more
closely with our affiliates and members to secure a broad range
of inventory to meet our members needs.
Expand
Rentals
Our strategy for expanding our rentals business involves
building upon our European business model by growing in existing
geographies, expanding in high demand destination markets and
effectively leveraging our large consumer base. We will continue
to grow our Novasol brand in its current geographies, expand the
Landal GreenParks model organically, by adding new franchise
parks, or through strategic partnerships with third party
developers for new parks, and grow our Holiday Cottages Group of
brands, by targeting the UK customer.
In the U.S., we will leverage our European rental expertise to
grow our presence in the vacation rental category, which is
currently fragmented and unorganized. We will do this by
building brand awareness across all channels including online
travel agents such as Travelocity and Orbitz. We will consider
appropriate acquisition opportunities to help us build our
position in the U.S. vacation rentals market.
15
Enhance
Margins
We plan to continue to reduce costs, improve efficiency and
evaluate opportunities to improve pricing and yield across all
our businesses in response to the current economic downturn. One
example of these efforts is our recent restructuring initiative.
In Exchange, we have a comprehensive program to improve internet
capabilities that, in addition to improving member satisfaction
and retention, is expected to reduce operating costs. In
Rentals, we will look for opportunities to leverage our multiple
European rental businesses where appropriate to build a
pan-European offering.
Seasonality
Vacation exchange and rentals revenues are generally higher in
the first and third quarters than in the second or fourth
quarters. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental
transaction revenues earned from booking vacation rentals to
rental customers are usually highest in the third quarter, when
vacation rentals are highest. More than half of our vacation
rental customers book their reservations within 11 weeks of
departure dates and more than 70% of our rental customers book
their reservations within 20 weeks of departure dates. In
2008, these trends changed and booking windows shortened,
however, we cannot predict whether this booking trend will
continue in the future.
Competition
The vacation exchange and rentals business faces competition
throughout the world. Our vacation exchange business competes
with Interval Leisure Group, Inc. which is a third-party
international exchange company, with regional and local vacation
exchange companies and with Internet-only limited service
exchanges. In addition, certain developers offer exchanges
through internal networks of properties, which can be operated
by us or by the developer, that offer owners of intervals access
to exchanges other than those offered by our vacation exchange
business. Our vacation rentals business faces competition from a
broad variety of professional vacation rental managers and
rent-by-owner
channels that collectively use brokerage services, direct
marketing and the Internet to market and rent vacation
properties. For rentals in Europe these include Center Parcs,
HomeAway, Interhome, Inter Chalet and Pierre et Vacances. In the
U.S., these companies include HomeAway and ResortQuest.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks RCI, RCI Points,
The Registry Collection, Landal
GreenParks, Cottages4You, Novasol,
Cuendet, Canvas, Endless
Vacation and Endless Vacation Rental as well
as other various trademarks and logos. Such trademarks and logos
are material to the businesses that are part of our vacation
exchange and rentals business. Our subsidiaries actively use
these marks, and all of the material marks are registered (or
have applications pending) with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office
and/or
with
the relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where
these businesses have significant operations.
WYNDHAM
VACATION OWNERSHIP
Vacation
Ownership Industry Overview
The $11 billion global vacation ownership industry, which
is also referred to as the timeshare industry, is a component of
the domestic and international hospitality industry. The
vacation ownership industry enables customers to share ownership
of a fully-furnished vacation accommodation. Typically, a
vacation ownership purchaser acquires either a fee simple
interest in a property, which gives the purchaser title to a
fraction of a unit, or a right to use a property, which gives
the purchaser the right to use a property for a specific period
of time. Generally, a vacation ownership purchasers fee
simple interest in or right to use a property is referred to as
a vacation ownership interest. For many vacation
ownership interest purchasers, vacation ownership is an
attractive vacation alternative to traditional lodging
accommodations at hotels or owning vacation properties. Owners
of vacation ownership interests are not subject to the variance
in room rates to which lodging customers are subject, and
vacation ownership units are, on average, more than twice the
size of traditional hotel rooms and typically have more
amenities, such as kitchens, than do traditional hotel rooms.
The vacation ownership concept originated in Europe during the
late 1960s and spread to the United States shortly thereafter.
The vacation ownership industry expanded slowly in the United
States until the mid-1980s. From the mid-1980s through 2007, the
vacation ownership industry grew at a double-digit CAGR,
although sales are believed to have slowed in 2008 and are
expected to decline during 2009. Based on ARDA research,
domestic sales of vacation ownership interests were
approximately $11 billion in 2007 compared to
$6.5 billion in 2003. ARDA estimated that on
January 1, 2008, there were approximately 4.7 million
households that owned one or more vacation ownership interests
in the United States.
16
Based on published industry data, we believe that the following
factors have contributed to the substantial growth, particularly
in North America, of the vacation ownership industry over the
past two decades:
|
|
|
increased consumer confidence in the industry based on enhanced
consumer protection regulation of the industry;
|
|
|
entry of lodging and entertainment companies into the industry,
including Marriott International, Inc., The Walt Disney Company,
Hilton Hotels Corporation, Global Hyatt Corporation, and
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.;
|
|
|
increased flexibility for owners of vacation ownership interests
made possible through owners affiliations with vacation
ownership exchange companies and vacation ownership
companies internal exchange programs; and
|
|
|
improvement in quality of resorts and resort management and
servicing.
|
Demographic factors explain, in part, the growth of the
industry. A 2008 study of recent vacation ownership purchasers
revealed that the average purchaser was 53 years of age and
had a median household income of $73,000. The average purchaser
in the United States, therefore, is a baby boomer who has
disposable income and interest in purchasing vacation products.
We believe that baby boomers will continue to have a positive
influence on the vacation ownership industry. However, we expect
that industry-wide gross vacation ownership sales will decline
during 2009 due to the current economic environment. According
to ARDA, the industry could see as much as a 20% decline in
sales if the current economic environment does not improve.
According to information compiled by ARDA, the four primary
reasons consumers cite for purchasing vacation ownership
interests are: (i) flexibility with respect to different
locations, unit sizes and times of year, (ii) the certainty
of quality accommodations, (iii) credibility of the
timeshare company and (iv) the opportunity to exchange into
other resort locations. According to a 2008 ARDA study, nearly
85% of owners of vacation ownership interests expressed a
general level of satisfaction with owning timeshare. With
respect to exchange opportunities, most owners of vacation
ownership interests can exchange vacation ownership interests
through exchange companies and through the applicable vacation
ownership companys internal network of properties.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership Overview
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business,
includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests,
consumer financing in connection with the purchase by
individuals of vacation ownership interests, property management
services to property owners associations, and development
and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our
vacation ownership business through our two primary brands,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham. We have the
largest vacation ownership business in the world as measured by
the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation ownership
units and owners of vacation ownership interests and by annual
revenues associated with the sale of vacation ownership
interests. As of December 31, 2008, we have developed or
acquired approximately 150 vacation ownership resorts in the
United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and the South
Pacific that represent approximately 20,000 individual vacation
ownership units and over 830,000 owners of vacation ownership
interests. During 2008, Wyndham Vacation Ownership expanded its
portfolio with the addition of ten resorts in Santee, South
Carolina; New Orleans, Louisiana; Steamboat Springs, Colorado;
Taos, New Mexico; Santa Fe, New Mexico; Las Vegas, Nevada;
Long Beach, Washington; New Braunfels, Texas; Anaheim,
California; and Wanaka, New Zealand, and added additional
inventory at locations in Florida, Tennessee and Hawaii. During
2008, we recorded almost $2.0 billion in gross vacation
ownership interest sales. In response to worldwide economic
conditions impacting the general availability of credit on which
our vacation ownership business has historically been reliant,
we announced in late 2008 a plan to reduce our 2009 revenues by
approximately 40% as compared to 2008 in order to reduce our
need to access the asset-backed securities markets in 2009 and
beyond, and also significantly reduce costs and capital needs
while enhancing cash flow.
Our primary vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, operate vacation ownership programs
through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for
vacations through points- or credits-based internal reservation
systems that provide owners with flexibility (subject to
availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type
and time of year. The points- or credits-based reservation
systems offer owners redemption opportunities for other travel
and leisure products that may be offered from time to time, and
the opportunity for owners to use our products for one or more
vacations per year based on level of ownership. Our vacation
ownership programs allow us to market and sell our vacation
ownership products in variable quantities as opposed to the
fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week vacation
ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval basis,
and to offer to existing owners upgrade sales to
supplement such owners existing vacation ownership
interests. Although we operate Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham as separate brands, we have integrated
substantially all of the business functions of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark
17
by Wyndham, including consumer finance, information technology,
certain staff functions, product development and certain
marketing activities.
Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its
revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and derives
other revenues from consumer financing and property management.
Because revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and
consumer finance in connection with such sales depend on the
number of vacation ownership units in which we sell vacation
ownership interests, increasing the number of such units is
important to achieving our revenue goals. Because revenues from
property management depend on the number of units we manage,
increasing the number of such units has a direct effect of
increasing our revenue from property management.
Sales and
Marketing of Vacation Ownership Interests and Property
Management
Wyndham
Vacation Resorts
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts portfolio of resort
properties and uses a points-based reservation system called
FairShare Plus to provide owners with flexibility (subject to
availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type
and time of year. Wyndham Vacation Resorts is involved in the
development or acquisition of the resort properties in which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests. Wyndham Vacation Resorts also often acts as a
property manager of such resorts. From time to time, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also sells home lots and other real estate
interests at its resort properties.
Vacation Ownership Interests, Portfolio of Resorts and
Maintenance Fees.
The vacation ownership interests that
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells consist of fixed
weeks and undivided interests. A fixed week entitles an owner to
ownership and usage rights with respect to a unit for a specific
week of each year, whereas an undivided interest entitles an
owner to ownership and usage rights that are not restricted to a
particular week of the year. These vacation ownership interests
each constitute a deeded interest in real estate and on average
sold for approximately $19,000 in 2008. As of December 31,
2008, approximately 515,000 owners held interests in Wyndham
Vacation Resorts resort properties. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
properties are located primarily in the United States and, as of
December 31, 2008, consisted of 71 resorts (six of which
are shared with WorldMark by Wyndham) that represented
approximately 12,700 units.
The majority of the resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
develops, markets and sells vacation ownership and other real
estate interests are destination resorts that are located at or
near attractions such as the Walt Disney
World
®
Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Myrtle Beach
in South Carolina; Colonial
Williamsburg
®
in Virginia; and the Hawaiian Islands. Most Wyndham Vacation
Resorts properties are affiliated with Wyndham Worldwides
vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI, which awards to the top 10%
of RCI affiliated vacation ownership resorts throughout the
world designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver
Crown Resort for exceptional resort standards and service
levels. Among Wyndham Vacation Resorts 71 resort
properties, 53 have been awarded designations of an RCI Gold
Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown Resort.
Owners of vacation ownership interests pay annual maintenance
fees to the property owners associations responsible for
managing the applicable resorts. The annual maintenance fee
associated with the average vacation ownership interest
purchased ranges from approximately $400 to approximately $900.
These fees generally are used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay operating, maintenance and cleaning costs, pay
management fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in some states),
insurance and other related costs. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, as
the owner of unsold inventory at resorts, also pays maintenance
fees to property owners associations in accordance with
the legal requirements of the states or jurisdictions in which
the resorts are located. In addition, at certain newly-developed
resorts, Wyndham Vacation Resorts enters into subsidy agreements
with the property owners associations to cover costs that
otherwise would be covered by annual maintenance fees payable
with respect to vacation ownership interests that have not yet
been sold.
FairShare Plus.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts uses a
points-based internal reservation system called FairShare Plus
to provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as
to resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year.
With the launch of FairShare Plus in 1991, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts became one of the first U.S. developers of vacation
ownership properties to move from traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership to a points-based program. Owners of vacation
ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties that are eligible to participate in the program may
elect, and with respect to certain resorts are obligated, to
participate in FairShare Plus.
Owners who participate in FairShare Plus assign their rights to
use fixed weeks and undivided interests, as applicable, to a
trust in exchange for the right to reserve in the internal
reservation system. The number of points that an owner receives
as a result of the assignment to the trust of the owners
right to use fixed weeks or undivided interests, and the number
of points required to take a particular vacation, is set forth
on a published schedule and
18
varies depending on the resort location, length of stay, unit
type and time of year associated with the interests assigned to
the trust or requested by the owner, as applicable. Participants
in FairShare Plus may choose (subject to availability) the
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties, length of stay, unit
types and times of year, depending on the number of points to
which they are entitled and the number of points required to
take the vacations of their preference. Participants in the
program may redeem their points not only for resort stays, but
also for other travel and leisure products that may be offered
from time to time. Owners of vacation points are able to borrow
vacation points from the next year for use in the current year.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts offers various programs that provide
existing owners with the opportunity to upgrade, or
acquire additional vacation ownership interests to increase the
number of points such owners can use in FairShare Plus.
Depending on the vacation ownership interest, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts not only offers owners the option to make reservations
through FairShare Plus, but also offers owners the opportunity
to exchange their vacation ownership interests through our
vacation exchange business, RCI, or through Interval
International, Inc., which is a third-party international
exchange company.
Program and Property Management.
In exchange for
management fees, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, itself or through a
Wyndham Vacation Resorts affiliate, manages FairShare Plus, the
majority of property owners associations at resorts in
which Wyndham Vacation Resorts develops, markets and sells
vacation ownership interests, and property owners
associations at resorts developed by third parties. On behalf of
FairShare Plus, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliate
manages the reservation system for FairShare Plus and provides
owner services and billing and collections services. The term of
the trust agreement of FairShare Plus runs through
December 31, 2025, and the term is automatically extended
for successive ten year periods unless a majority of the members
of the program vote to terminate the trust agreement prior to
the expiration of the term then in effect. The term of the
management agreement, under which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
manages the FairShare Plus program, is for five years and is
automatically renewed annually for successive terms of five
years, provided the trustee under the program does not serve
notice of termination to Wyndham Vacation Resorts at the end of
any calendar year. On behalf of property owners
associations, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliates
generally provide day-to-day management for vacation ownership
resorts, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and refurbishment of the units, and provides certain
accounting and administrative services to property owners
associations. The terms of the property management agreements
with the property owners associations at resorts in which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts develops, markets and sells vacation
ownership interests vary; however, the vast majority of the
agreements provide a mechanism for automatic renewal upon
expiration of the terms. At some established sites, the property
owners associations have entered into property management
agreements with professional management companies other than
Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliates.
WorldMark
by Wyndham
WorldMark by Wyndham develops, markets and sells vacation
ownership interests, which are called vacation credits (holiday
credits in the South Pacific), in resorts owned by the vacation
ownership programs WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South
Pacific Club, which we refer to collectively as the Clubs, which
WorldMark by Wyndham formed in 1989 and 2000, respectively. The
Clubs provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability)
as to resort location, length of stay, unit type, the day of the
week and time of year. WorldMark by Wyndham is usually involved
in the development of the resorts owned by the Clubs. In
addition to developing resorts and marketing and selling
vacation credits, WorldMark by Wyndham manages the Clubs and the
majority of resorts owned by the Clubs.
In October 1999, WorldMark by Wyndham formed Wyndham Vacation
Resorts Asia Pacific Pty. Ltd., a New South Wales corporation,
or Wyndham Asia Pacific, as its direct wholly owned subsidiary
for the purpose of conducting sales, marketing and resort
development activities in the South Pacific. Wyndham Asia
Pacific is currently the largest vacation ownership business in
Australia, with approximately 42,600 owners of vacation credits
as of December 31, 2008. Resorts in the South Pacific
typically are owned and operated through WorldMark South Pacific
Club, other than 71 units at Denarau Island, Fiji, which
are owned by WorldMark, The Club.
Vacation Credits, Portfolio of Resorts and Maintenance
Fees.
Vacation credits in the Clubs entitle the owner of
the credits to reserve units at the resorts that are owned and
operated by the Clubs. WorldMark by Wyndham and Wyndham Asia
Pacific are the developers or acquirers of the resorts that the
Clubs own and operate. After WorldMark by Wyndham or Wyndham
Asia Pacific develops or acquires resorts, it conveys the
resorts to WorldMark, The Club or WorldMark South Pacific Club,
as applicable. In exchange for the conveyances, WorldMark by
Wyndham or Wyndham Asia Pacific receives the exclusive rights to
sell the vacation credits associated with the conveyed resorts
and to receive the proceeds from the sales of the vacation
credits. Although vacation credits, unlike vacation ownership
interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties, do not
constitute deeded interests in real estate, vacation credits are
regulated in most jurisdictions by the same agency that
regulates vacation ownership interests evidenced by deeded
interests in real estate. In 2008, the average purchase by
19
a new owner of vacation credits was approximately $12,800. As of
December 31, 2008, over 318,000 owners held vacation
credits in the Clubs.
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are located primarily in the
Western United States, Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific and,
as of December 31, 2008, consisted of 88 resorts (six of
which are shared with Wyndham Vacation Resorts) that represented
approximately 7,100 units. Of the WorldMark by Wyndham
resorts and units, Wyndham Asia Pacific has a total of 17
resorts with approximately 700 units. During 2008,
WorldMark by Wyndham expanded its portfolio of resorts to
include properties in Taos, New Mexico; Santa Fe, New
Mexico; Las Vegas, Nevada; Long Beach, Washington; New
Braunfels, Texas; Anaheim, California; and Wanaka, New Zealand.
The resorts in which WorldMark by Wyndham develops, markets and
sells vacation credits are primarily drive-to resorts. Most
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are affiliated with Wyndham
Worldwides vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI. Among
WorldMark by Wyndhams 88 resorts, 60 have been awarded
designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown
Resort.
Owners of vacation credits pay annual maintenance fees to the
Clubs. The annual maintenance fee associated with the average
vacation credit purchased is approximately $500. The maintenance
fee that an owner pays is based on the number of the
owners vacation credits. These fees are intended to cover
the Clubs operating costs, including the dues to the
property owners associations, which are generally the
Clubs responsibility. Fees paid to property owners
associations are generally used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay maintenance and cleaning costs, pay management
fees and expenses, and cover taxes, insurance and other related
costs. Maintenance of common areas and the provision of
amenities typically is the responsibility of the property
owners associations. WorldMark by Wyndham has a minimal
ownership interest in the Clubs that results from WorldMark by
Wyndhams ownership of unsold vacation credits in the
Clubs. As the owner of unsold vacation credits, WorldMark by
Wyndham pays maintenance fees to the Clubs.
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific
Club.
The Clubs provide owners of vacation credits with
flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort location,
length of stay, unit type and time of year. Depending on how
many vacation credits an owner has purchased, the owner may use
the vacation credits for one or more vacations annually. The
number of vacation credits that are required for each days
stay at a unit is listed on a published schedule and varies
depending upon the resort location, unit type, time of year and
the day of the week. Owners may also redeem their credits for
other travel and leisure products that may be offered from time
to time.
Owners of vacation credits are able to carry over unused
vacation credits in one year to the next year and to borrow
vacation credits from the next year for use in the current year.
Owners of vacation credits are also able to purchase bonus time
from the Clubs for use when space is available. Bonus time gives
owners the opportunity to use available resorts on short notice
and at a reduced rate and to obtain usage beyond owners
allotments of vacation credits. In addition, WorldMark by
Wyndham offers owners the opportunity to upgrade, or
acquire additional vacation credits to increase the number of
credits such owners can use in the Clubs.
Owners of vacation credits can make reservations through the
Clubs, or may elect to join and exchange their vacation
ownership interests through our vacation exchange business, RCI,
or Interval International, Inc., which is a third-party
international exchange company.
Club and Property Management.
In exchange for
management fees, WorldMark by Wyndham, itself or through a
WorldMark by Wyndham affiliate, serves as the exclusive property
manager and servicing agent of the Clubs and all resort units
owned or operated by the Clubs. On behalf of the Clubs,
WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate provides day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services. WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate also manages the
reservation system for the Clubs and provides owner services and
billing and collections services.
Sales and
Marketing Channels and Programs
Wyndham Vacation Ownership employs a variety of marketing
channels as part of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham marketing programs to encourage prospective owners of
vacation ownership interests to tour Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham resort properties, as applicable, and
to attend sales presentations at off-site sales offices.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer a
variety of entry-level programs and products as part of their
sales strategies. One such program allows prospective owners to
acquire one-years worth of points or credits with no
further obligations; another such product is a biennial
interest, which prospective owners can buy, that provides for
vacations every other year. As part of their sales strategies,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham rely on their
points/credits-based programs, which provide prospective owners
with the flexibility to buy relatively small packages of points
or credits, which can be upgraded at a later date. To facilitate
20
upgrades among existing owners, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham market opportunities for owners to purchase
additional points or credits through periodic marketing
campaigns and promotions to owners while those owners vacation
at Wyndham Vacation Resorts or WorldMark by Wyndham resort
properties, as applicable.
The marketing and sales activities of Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham are often facilitated through marketing
alliances with other travel, hospitality, entertainment, gaming
and retail companies that provide access to such companies
present and past customers through a variety of co-branded
marketing offers.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts
sells its vacation ownership interests and other real estate
interests at 42 resort locations and nine off-site sales centers
as of December 31, 2008.
On-site
sales accounted for approximately 91% of all new sales during
2008.
On-site
sales presentations typically follow a resort tour led by a
Wyndham Vacation Resorts salesperson. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
conducted approximately 699,000 and 668,000 tours in 2008 and
2007, respectively.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts
on-site
sales centers, which are located in popular travel destinations
throughout the United States, generate substantial tour flow
through providing local offers. The sales centers enable Wyndham
Vacation Resorts to market to tourists already visiting
destination areas. Wyndham Vacation Resorts marketing
agents, which often operate on the premises of the hospitality,
entertainment, gaming and retail companies with which Wyndham
Vacation Resorts has alliances within these markets, solicit
local tourists with offers relating to activities and
entertainment in exchange for the tourists visiting the
local resorts and attending sales presentations. An example of a
marketing alliance through which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets to tourists already visiting destination areas is
Wyndham Vacation Resorts current arrangement with
Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas, Nevada, which enables
Wyndham Vacation Resorts to operate concierge-style marketing
kiosks throughout Harrahs Casino that permit Wyndham
Vacation Resorts to solicit patrons to attend tours and sales
presentations with Harrahs-related rewards and
entertainment offers, such as gaming chips, show tickets and
dining certificates. Wyndham Vacation Resorts also operates its
primary Las Vegas sales center within Harrahs Casino and
regularly shuttles prospective owners targeted by such sales
centers to and from Wyndham Vacation Resorts nearby resort
property.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers also
enable Wyndham Vacation Resorts to actively solicit upgrade
sales to existing owners of vacation ownership interests while
such owners vacation at Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties. Sales of vacation ownership interests relating to
upgrades represented approximately 54%, 48% and 46% of Wyndham
Vacation Resorts net sales of vacation ownership interests
in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndham.
WorldMark by Wyndham sells
its vacation credits in the United States primarily at 32 sales
offices, 5 of which are located off-site in metropolitan areas.
Wyndham Asia Pacific conducts its international sales and
marketing efforts through
on-site
and
off-site sales offices, telemarketing and road shows. As of
December 31, 2008, Wyndham Asia Pacific had 10 sales
offices throughout the east coast of Australia, the North Island
of New Zealand and Fiji. Off-site sales offices generated
approximately 38% and 40% of WorldMark by Wyndhams sales
of new vacation credits in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndham conducted approximately 444,000 and 476,000
tours in 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of December 31,
2008, over 50 WorldMark by Wyndham sales offices were closed in
connection with the organizational realignment initiatives
announced in October 2008.
WorldMark by Wyndhams off-site sales offices market
vacation credits through local offers to prospective owners in
areas where such purchasers reside. WorldMark by Wyndhams
off-site sales offices provide WorldMark by Wyndham with access
to large numbers of prospective owners and a convenient, local
venue at which to preview and sell vacation credits. The
location of off-site sales offices in metropolitan areas
provides WorldMark by Wyndham with access to a wide group of
qualified sales personnel.
WorldMark by Wyndham uses a variety of marketing programs to
attract prospective owners, including sponsored contests that
offer vacation packages or gifts, targeted mailings, outbound
and inbound telemarketing efforts, and various other promotional
programs. WorldMark by Wyndham also co-sponsors sweepstakes,
giveaways and other promotional programs with professional teams
at major sporting events and with other third parties at other
high-traffic consumer events. Where permissible under state law,
WorldMark by Wyndham offers existing owners cash awards or other
incentives for referrals of new owners.
WorldMark by Wyndham and Wyndham Asia Pacific periodically
encourage existing owners of vacation credits to acquire
additional vacation credits through various methods. Sales of
vacation credits relating to upgrades represented approximately
45%, 38% and 35% of WorldMark by Wyndhams net sales of
vacation credits in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Sales of
vacation credits relating to upgrades represented approximately
49%, 39% and 19% of Wyndham Asia Pacifics net sales of
vacation credits in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
21
Purchaser
Financing
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer
financing to purchasers of vacation ownership interests. By
offering consumer financing, we are able to reduce the initial
cash required by customers to purchase vacation ownership
interests, thereby enabling us to attract additional customers
and generate substantial incremental revenues and profits.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership funds and services loans extended by
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham through our
consumer financing subsidiary, Wyndham Consumer Finance, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Wyndham Vacation Resorts based in Las
Vegas, Nevada that performs loan financing, servicing and
related administrative functions. As of December 31, 2008,
we serviced a portfolio of approximately 270,000 loans that
totaled $3,637 million in aggregate principal amount
outstanding, with an average interest rate of 12.7%.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham typically
perform a credit investigation or other review or inquiry into
every purchasers credit history before offering to finance
a portion of the purchase price of the vacation ownership
interests. Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham
offer purchasers with good credit ratings an enhanced financing
option. The interest rate offered to participating purchasers is
determined from automated underwriting based upon the
purchasers credit score, the amount of the down payment
and the size of purchase. Both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham offer purchasers an interest rate reduction
if they participate in their pre-authorized checking, or PAC,
programs, pursuant to which our consumer financing subsidiary
each month debits a purchasers bank account or major
credit card in the amount of the monthly payment by a
pre-authorized fund transfer on the payment date. As of
December 31, 2008, approximately 84% of purchaser financing
loans serviced by our consumer financing subsidiary participated
in the PAC program.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham generally
require a minimum down payment of 10% of the purchase price on
all sales of vacation ownership interests and offer consumer
financing for the remaining balance for up to ten years. These
loans are structured so that we receive equal monthly
installments that fully amortize the principal due by the final
due date. Both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham
offer programs through which prospective owners may accumulate
the required 10% down payment over a period of time not greater
than six months. The prospective owner is placed in
pending status until the required 10% down payment
amount is received. During 2009, we have raised the eligibility
requirements for participation in such programs.
Similar to other companies that provide consumer financing, we
historically securitize a majority of the receivables originated
in connection with the sales of our vacation ownership
interests. We initially place the financed contracts into a
revolving warehouse securitization facility generally within 30
to 90 days after origination. Many of the receivables are
subsequently transferred from the warehouse securitization
facility and placed into term securitization facilities. As of
December 31, 2008, the aggregate principal amount
outstanding of receivables in the warehouse securitization
facility and the term securitization facilities was
$1,039 million and $1,709 million, respectively. In
response to the tightened asset-backed credit environment, we
announced a plan during the fourth quarter of 2008 to reduce our
need to access the asset-backed securities market during 2009.
Servicing
and Collection Procedures
Our consumer financing subsidiary is responsible for the
maintenance of contract receivables files and all customer
service, billing and collection activities related to the
domestic loans we extend. Our consumer financing subsidiary also
places loans pledged in our warehouse and term securitization
facilities. As of December 31, 2008, our consumer financing
subsidiary had approximately 400 employees, the majority of
whom work in customer service, account placement and
maintenance, and loan collection functions.
Since April 2005, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham have used a single computerized online data system to
maintain loan records and service the loans. This system permits
access to customer account inquiries and is supported by our
information technology department.
The collection methodologies for both brands are similar and
entail a combination of mailings and telephone calls which are
supported by an automated dialer. As of December 31, 2008,
the loan portfolios of both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham were approximately 94.1% current (i.e., not
more than 30 days past due).
We assess the performance of our loan portfolio by monitoring
certain metrics on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis.
These metrics include, but are not limited to, collections
rates, account roll rates, defaults by state residency of the
obligor and bankruptcies. We define defaults as accounts that
are 120 days or more past due plus bankrupt accounts. One
of the means of assessing defaults and portfolio performance is
through the application of static pool methodology that tracks
defaults based on the receivables year of origination.
There are various methods of calculating static pool defaults.
Our method of calculating static pool defaults includes
originations for which we
22
have a full year of history and provided for an average expected
cumulative gross default rate of 18.8% and 17.9% as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Strategies
In accordance with our previously announced plans to reduce the
size and scope of our vacation ownership business in order to
reduce our need to access the asset-backed securities markets in
2009 and beyond, we also intend to improve efficiencies in our
vacation ownership business by refining our marketing and sales
efforts, strengthening our product offerings, and improving the
quality of our loan portfolio.
Refine
Our Sales and Marketing Efforts
We plan to refine our sales and marketing strategies by heavily
focusing our efforts on current owners, our most efficient and
reliable marketing channel, as well as highly qualified
prospective new owners. We plan to continue to leverage the
Wyndham brand in our marketing efforts to strengthen our
position in the higher-end segment of the vacation ownership
industry, to attract prospective new owners in higher income
demographics through Wyndham-branded marketing campaigns, and to
increase upgrade sales through the application of the Wyndham
brand within existing and new higher-end products and product
features.
Strengthen
Our Product Offerings
We plan to strengthen the products that we offer by adding new
resorts and resort locations and expanding our offering of
higher-end products and product features. We are developing
additional product in domestic regions we currently serve such
as Orlando, Las Vegas, San Francisco, Gatlinburg,
Washington, D.C. (Prince Georges County, Maryland)
and Hawaii.
We are applying the Wyndham brand at new domestic and
international resorts, as well as at select locations within our
current portfolio of resorts. In addition, we seek to develop
and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership properties in
conjunction with the Wyndham brand. The mixed-use properties
would afford us access to both hotel clients in higher income
demographics for the purpose of marketing vacation ownership
interests and hotel inventory for use in our marketing programs.
We plan to expand upon existing and create new higher-end,
product offerings in conjunction with the Wyndham brand. We plan
to continue to associate the Wyndham brand with our existing
high-end Presidential-style vacation ownership units, including
new offerings made available to our owners who have attained
enhanced membership status within our vacation ownership
programs as a result of achieving substantial ownership levels.
We are also exploring opportunities to apply the Wyndham brand
to future higher-end luxury products.
We are commencing to market and sell a new vacation ownership
product, known as ClubWyndham Access. The product will leverage
the Wyndham brand and include features that we expect existing
owners and new prospects alike will find attractive.
Consequently, we expect the product will facilitate upgrade
sales to existing owners and sales to new owners.
Improve
the Quality of Our Loan Portfolio
We plan to improve the quality of our loan portfolio by
establishing more restrictive financing terms for customers that
fall within the our lower credit classifications. We also plan
to continue modifying our tour qualifications in order to
increase the likelihood that those persons whom we finance will
be more creditworthy than has historically been the case.
Seasonality
We rely, in part, upon tour flow to generate sales of vacation
ownership interests; consequently, sales volume tends to
increase in the spring and summer months as a result of greater
tour flow from spring and summer travelers. Revenues from sales
of vacation ownership interests therefore are generally higher
in the second and third quarters than in other quarters. We
cannot predict whether these seasonal trends will continue in
the future.
Competition
The vacation ownership industry is highly competitive and is
comprised of a number of companies specializing primarily in
sales and marketing, consumer financing, property management and
development of vacation ownership properties. In addition, a
number of national hospitality chains develop and sell vacation
ownership interests to consumers. Some of the well-known players
in the industry include Disney Vacation Club, Hilton Grand
Vacations Company LLC, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. and
Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc.
23
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Vacation Ownership,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, WorldMark by
Wyndham, and FairShare Plus and related
trademarks and logos, and such trademarks and logos are material
to the businesses that are part of our vacation ownership
business. Our subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of
the material marks are registered (or have applications pending)
with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with
the relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where
these businesses have significant operations. We own the
WorldMark trademark pursuant to an assignment
agreement with WorldMark, The Club. Pursuant to the assignment
agreement, WorldMark, The Club may request that the mark be
reassigned to it only in the event of a termination of the
WorldMark vacation ownership programs.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2008, we had approximately
27,000 employees, including approximately
8,300 employees outside of the United States. At
December 31, 2008, our lodging business had approximately
5,000 employees, our vacation exchange and rentals business
had approximately 7,800 employees and our vacation
ownership business had approximately 13,800 employees.
Approximately 1% of our employees are subject to collective
bargaining agreements governing their employment with our
company. We believe that our relations with employees are good.
GOVERNMENT
REGULATION
Our businesses are either subject to or affected by
international, federal, state and local laws, regulations and
policies, which are constantly subject to change. The
descriptions of the laws, regulations and policies that follow
are summaries and should be read in conjunction with the texts
of the laws and regulations described below. The descriptions do
not purport to cover all present and proposed laws, regulations
and policies that affect our businesses.
Regulations
Generally Applicable to Our Business
Our businesses are subject to, among others, laws and
regulations that affect privacy and data collection, marketing
regulation, the use of the Internet and others.
Privacy and Data Collection.
The collection and
use of personal data of our customers and our ability to contact
our customers, including through telephone, email or facsimile,
as well as the sharing of our customer data with affiliates and
third parties, are governed by privacy laws and regulations
enacted in the United States and in other jurisdictions around
the world. Privacy regulations continue to evolve and on
occasion may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another.
Many states have introduced legislation or enacted laws and
regulations that require compliance with standards for data
collection and protection of privacy and, in some instances,
provide for penalties for failure to notify customers when the
security of a companys electronic/computer systems
designed to protect such standards are breached, even by third
parties. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, adopted
do not call and do not fax regulations
in October 2003. Also do not call legislation became
effective in Australia in May 2007. In response to do not
call and do not fax regulations, our affected
businesses have modified, where appropriate, their approach to
outbound telemarketing practices, and periodically review
outbound lists against regulated, constantly updated do
not call lists. In addition, our European businesses have
adopted policies and procedures to reasonably comply with the
European Union Directive on Data Protection. These policies and
procedures require that, among other things, consent to use
customer data (other than in accordance with our stipulated
privacy policies, or to transfer the data outside of the
European Union, or as otherwise necessary for
certain authorized purposes, including, for example, the
performance of a contract with the individual concerned) must be
obtained.
Marketing Operations.
The products and services
offered by our various businesses are marketed through a number
of distribution channels, including direct mail, telemarketing
and online. These channels are regulated at the federal, state
and local levels, and we believe that the effect of such
regulations on our marketing operations will increase over time.
Such regulations, which include anti-fraud laws, consumer
protection laws, privacy laws, identity theft laws, anti-spam
laws, telemarketing laws and telephone solicitation laws, may
limit our ability to solicit new customers or to market
additional products or services to existing customers. In
addition, some of our business units use sweepstakes and
contests as part of their marketing and promotional programs.
These activities are regulated primarily by state laws that
require certain disclosures and assurance that the prizes will
be available to the winners.
Internet.
A number of laws and regulations have
been adopted to regulate the Internet. In addition, it is
possible that existing laws may be interpreted to apply to the
Internet in ways that the existing laws are not currently
applied, particularly with respect to the imposition of state
and local taxes on the use and reservation of accommodations
through the Internet. Regulatory and legal requirements are
particularly subject to change with respect to the Internet
24
and may become more restrictive, which will increase the
difficulty and expense of compliance or otherwise restrict our
business units abilities to conduct operations as such
operations are currently conducted.
We continue to follow and reasonably monitor the status of
federal, state and international legislation related to privacy,
data security and marketing with respect to the onsite
marketplace and the use and protection of customer data, as well
as with the effect, if any, such legislation may have on our
businesses. California, for example, has enacted legislation
that requires certain minimum disclosures on Internet web sites
regarding consumer privacy and information sharing among
affiliated entities. Other states have enacted similar laws or
have legislation pending. We cannot predict with certainty what
affect these laws will have on our practices with respect to
customer information
and/or
on
our ability to market our products and services, nor can we
predict whether additional states will enact similar laws.
Because Internet reservations are more cost-effective than
reservations taken over the phone, our costs may increase if
Internet reservations are adversely affected by regulations.
Travel Agency Services.
The travel agency products
and services that our businesses provide are subject to various
federal, state and local regulations. We must comply with laws
and regulations that relate to our marketing and sales of such
products and services, including laws and regulations that
prohibit unfair and deceptive advertising or practices and laws
that require us to register as a seller of travel to
comply with disclosure requirements. In addition, we are
indirectly affected by the regulation of our travel suppliers,
many of which are heavily regulated by the United States and
other governments. We are also affected by the European Union
Directive applicable to the sale and provision of package
holidays because some of our European businesses operate such
that they are classified, for certain of their operations, as
organizers of package holidays. This European Union Directive
places liability for the package holiday sold with the organizer
and requires that the organizer has security in place in order
to refund to the consumer money paid by such consumer in the
event of insolvency of the organizer.
Immigration.
Our domestic business is subject to
laws and regulations regarding employment of immigrants,
ensuring that we employ only U.S. work authorized
individuals. This requires us to perform proper hiring
procedures to confirm each new employees identity and
authorization to work in the United States. Recent and
anticipated changes in federal and state laws require employers
to verify social security numbers as well, which will require us
to devote additional resources to conducting the verification
process, communicating with employees about verification issues,
and, in some cases, terminating the employment of those who are
not able to timely resolve verification issues, even if those
employees are otherwise authorized to work in the United States.
Strict compliance with the laws may result in complaints of
discrimination on the basis of national origin; however, failure
to comply with these laws may subject the company to significant
penalties, such as the loss of a license to do business in
certain states or municipalities, the imposition of fines, or
reputational damage. We are also subject to similar laws and
regulations regarding employment of immigrants in other
jurisdictions around the world.
Persons with Disabilities.
The American with
Disabilities Act, or ADA, prohibits places of public
accommodation, such as lodging and restaurant facilities, from
discriminating against an individual on the basis of disability
as defined in the Act. The U.S. Department of Justice
published ADA Standards for Accessible Design and
ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and
Facilities, collectively referred to as ADAAG,
that, among other things, prescribe a specified number of
handicapped accessible rooms, assistive devices for hearing,
speech and visually impaired persons, and general standards of
design applicable to all areas of facilities subject to the law.
The ADAAG specifies the minimum room design and layout criteria
for handicapped accessible rooms. Any newly constructed facility
(given a certificate of occupancy after January 26,
1993) must comply with ADAAG and be readily
accessible to and useable by persons with disabilities.
Owners, lessors, lessees and operators of public accommodations
and their contractors are responsible for ADA and ADAAG
compliance. States may impose additional laws that address
accommodations and services for individuals with disabilities.
We are also subject to similar laws and regulations regarding
persons with disabilities in other jurisdictions around the
world.
Regulations
Applicable to the Lodging Business
Sale of Franchises.
The FTC, various state laws
and regulations and the laws of jurisdictions outside the United
States regulate the offer and sale of franchises. The FTC
requires that franchisors make extensive written disclosure in a
prescribed format to prospective franchisees but does not
require registration. The FTC recently enacted new franchise
regulations (the FTC Rule) that will affect sales
practices and procedures and the content of disclosure documents
that we use to sell franchises in the United States. The FTC
rule took effect on a mandatory basis on July 1, 2008. The
state laws that affect our franchise business regulate the offer
and sale of franchises, the termination, renewal and transfer of
franchise agreements, and the provision of loans to franchisees
as part of the sales of franchises. Currently, 14 states
have laws that require registration in connection with offers
and sales of franchises. In addition, 21 states currently
have franchise relationship laws that limit the
ability of franchisors to terminate franchise agreements or to
withhold consent to the renewal or transfer of the agreements.
California regulates the provision of loans to franchisees as
part of the sales of the franchises but we are currently exempt
from such law. The laws of jurisdictions outside the United
States regulate pre-sale disclosure and the commencement of
25
franchising. Multiple Canadian provinces and a number of foreign
jurisdictions have adopted general franchises and pre-sale
disclosure regulations.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Exchange and Rentals
Business
Our vacation exchange business is subject to, among other laws
and regulations, statutes in certain jurisdictions that regulate
vacation exchange services, and we must prepare and file
annually, disclosure guides with regulators in jurisdictions
where such filings are required. Although our vacation exchange
business is not generally subject to laws and regulations that
govern the development of vacation ownership properties and the
sale of vacation ownership interests, these laws and regulations
directly affect the members of our vacation exchange program and
resorts with units that participate in our vacation exchanges.
These laws and regulations, therefore, indirectly affect our
vacation exchange business. In addition, several states and
localities are attempting to enact or have enacted laws or
regulations that would impose or impose, as applicable, taxes on
members that complete exchanges, similar to local transient
occupancy taxes. In certain jurisdictions, our vacation rentals
business is subject to seller of travel, travel club and real
estate brokerage licensing statutes.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Ownership Business
Our vacation ownership business is subject to, among others, the
laws and regulations that affect the marketing and sale of
vacation ownership interests, property management of vacation
ownership resorts, travel agency services and the conduct of
real estate brokers.
Federal, State and International Regulation of Vacation
Ownership Business
. Our vacation ownership business is
subject to federal legislation, including without limitation,
Housing and Urban Development Department regulations, such as
the Fair Housing Act; the
Truth-in-Lending
Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of
borrowers loans; the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
and Regulation X promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the settlement of
real estate transactions and servicing of loans; the Equal
Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated
thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of
credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital
status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the
exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the Telemarketing and Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act; the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act and
other laws, which address privacy of consumer financial
information; and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991.
Many states have laws that regulate our vacation ownership
business operations, including those relating to real
estate licensing, travel sales licensing, anti-fraud,
telemarketing, restrictions on the use of predictive dialers,
prize, gift and sweepstakes regulations, labor, and various
regulations governing access and use of our resorts by disabled
persons. In addition to regulation in the United States, our
vacation ownership business is subject to regulation in other
countries where we develop or manage resorts and where we market
or sell vacation ownership interests, including Canada, Mexico,
Australia, New Zealand and Fiji. The scope of regulation of our
vacation ownership business in Canada, where we develop, market,
sell and manage resorts, is similar to the scope of regulation
of our vacation ownership business in the United States. In
addition, in Australia, we are regulated by the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission, which requires that all
persons conducting vacation ownership sales and marketing and
vacation ownership club activities hold an Australian Financial
Services License and comply with the rules and regulations of
the Commission. Unlike in the United States, where the vacation
ownership industry is regulated primarily by state law, the
vacation ownership industry in Australia is regulated under
federal Australian securities law because Australian law regards
a vacation ownership interest as a security. As we expand our
vacation ownership business by entering new markets, we will
become subject to regulation in additional countries.
The sale of vacation ownership interests is potentially subject
to federal and state securities laws. However, most federal and
state agencies generally do not regulate our sale of vacation
ownership interests as securities, in part because we offer our
vacation ownership interests for personal vacation use and
enjoyment and not for investment purposes with the expectation
of profit or in conjunction with a rental arrangement. In
addition, the vacation ownership interests that we market and
sell are real estate interests or are akin to real estate
interests and therefore our vacation ownership business is
extensively regulated by many states departments of
commerce
and/or
real
estate. Because of such extensive regulation, additional
regulation of our vacation ownership products as securities
generally does not occur. Some states in which we market and
sell our vacation ownership interests regulate our products as
securities. In those states, we comply with such regulation by
either registering our vacation ownership interests for sale as
securities or qualifying for an exemption from registration and
by providing required disclosures to our purchasers. If federal
and additional state agencies elected to regulate our vacation
ownership interest products as securities, we would comply with
such regulation by either registering our vacation ownership
interests for sale as securities or qualifying for an exemption
from registration and by providing required disclosures to our
purchasers.
26
State real estate foreclosure laws impact our vacation ownership
business. We secure loans made to purchasers of vacation
ownership interests that constitute real estate interests and
that are deeded prior to loan repayment by requiring purchasers
to grant a first priority mortgage lien in our favor, which is
recorded against title to the vacation ownership interest. In
the event of a purchasers default, the purchaser will
often voluntarily deed the vacation ownership interest to us, in
which event foreclosure is not necessary. If the purchaser does
not do so, we may commence a judicial or non-judicial
foreclosure proceeding. State real estate foreclosure laws
normally require that certain conditions be satisfied prior to
completing foreclosure, including providing to the purchaser
both a notice and an opportunity to redeem the purchasers
interest and conducting a foreclosure sale. While state real
estate foreclosure laws impose requirements and expenses on us,
we are able to comply with the requirements, bear the expenses
and complete foreclosures. Several states have enacted
anti-deficiency laws which generally prohibit a lender from
recovering the portion of an outstanding loan in excess of the
proceeds of a foreclosure sale of a borrowers primary
residence that secures repayment of the loan. Since purchasers
of vacation ownership interests do not occupy a resort unit as a
primary residence, state anti-deficiency laws generally do not
impact us. Our sale of vacation ownership interests that are or
are similar to vacation credits is not impacted by state real
estate foreclosure and anti-deficiency laws, since vacation
credits and similar vacation ownership interests are not direct
real estate interests.
Marketing and Sale of Vacation Ownership
Interests.
We are subject to extensive regulation by
states departments of commerce
and/or
real
estate and international regulatory agencies, such as the
European Commission, in locations where our resorts in which we
sell vacation ownership interests are located or where we market
and sell vacation ownership interests. Many states regulate the
marketing and sale of vacation ownership interests, and the laws
of such states generally require a designated state authority to
approve a vacation ownership public report, which is a detailed
offering statement describing the resort operator and all
material aspects of the resort and the sale of vacation
ownership interests. In addition, the laws of most states in
which we sell vacation ownership interests grant the purchaser
of such an interest the right to rescind a contract of purchase
at any time within a statutory rescission period, which
generally ranges from three to 15 days, depending on the
state.
Property Management of Vacation Ownership Resorts.
Our vacation ownership business includes property management
operations that are subject to state condominium
and/or
vacation ownership management regulations and, in some states,
to professional licensing requirements.
Conduct of Real Estate Brokers.
The marketing and
sales component of our vacation ownership business is subject to
numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that
contain general standards for and prohibitions relating to the
conduct of real estate brokers and sales associates, including
laws and regulations that relate to the licensing of brokers and
sales associates, fiduciary and agency duties, administration of
trust funds, collection of commissions, and advertising and
consumer disclosures. The federal Real Estate Settlement
Procedures Act and state real estate brokerage laws also
restrict payments that real estate brokers and other parties may
receive or pay in connection with the sales of vacation
ownership interests and referral of prospective owners. Such
laws may, to some extent, restrict arrangements involving our
vacation ownership business.
Environmental Regulation.
Because our vacation
ownership business acquires, develops and renovates vacation
ownership interest resorts, we are subject to various
environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and similar
requirements in the jurisdictions where our resorts are located.
The environmental laws to which our vacation ownership business
is subject regulate various matters, including pollution,
hazardous and toxic substances and wastes, asbestos, petroleum
and storage tanks.
Regulations
Applicable to the Management of Property Operations
Our business that relates to the management of property
operations, which includes components of our lodging, vacation
ownership and vacation rental businesses, is subject to, among
others, laws and regulations that relate to health and
sanitation, the sale of alcoholic beverages, facility operation
and fire safety, including as described below, covering both U.S
and non U.S jurisdictional requirements.
Health and Sanitation.
Most jurisdictions have
regulations or statutes governing the lodging business or its
components, such as restaurants, swimming pools and health
facilities. Lodging and restaurant businesses often require
licensing by applicable authorities, and sometimes these
licenses are obtainable only after the business passes health
inspections to assure compliance with health and sanitation
codes. Health inspections are performed on a recurring basis.
Health-related laws affect the use of linens, towels, glassware
and automatic defibrillators. Other laws govern swimming pool
use and operation and require the posting of notices, certain
drain facilities, availability of certain rescue equipment and
limitations on the number of persons allowed to use the pool at
any time. These regulations typically impose civil fines or
penalties for violations, which may lead to operating
restrictions if uncorrected or in extreme cases of violations.
27
Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
Alcoholic beverage
service is subject to licensing and extensive regulations that
govern virtually all aspects of service. Compliance with these
regulations at locations managed, owned or operated by our
lodging or vacation ownership businesses may impose obligations
on the owners of managed hotels, Wyndham Hotel Management as the
property manager or both or on our vacation ownership resorts.
Managed hotel operations or vacation ownership resort operations
may be adversely affected by delays in transfers or issuances of
alcoholic beverage licenses necessary for food and beverage
services.
Facility Operation.
The operation of lodging
facilities is subject to innkeepers laws that
(i) authorize the innkeeper to assert a lien against and
sell, after observing certain procedures, the possessions of a
guest who owes an unpaid bill for lodging or other services
provided by the innkeeper, (ii) affect or limit the
liability of an innkeeper who posts required notices or
disclaimers for guest valuables if a safe is provided, guest
property, checked or stored baggage, mail and parked vehicles,
(iii) require posting of house rules and room rates in each
guest room or near the registration area, (iv) may require
registration of guests, proof of identity at check-in and
retention of records for a specified period of time,
(v) limit the rights of an innkeeper to refuse lodging to
prospective guests except under certain narrowly defined
circumstances, and (vi) may limit the right of the
innkeeper to evict a guest who overstays the scheduled stay or
otherwise gives a reason to be evicted. Federal and state laws
applicable to places of public accommodation prohibit
discrimination in lodging services on the basis of the race,
creed, color or national origin of the guest. Some states
prohibit the practice of overbooking and require the
innkeeper to provide the reserved lodging or find alternate
accommodations if the guest has paid a deposit, or face a civil
fine. Some states and municipalities have also enacted laws and
regulations governing no-smoking areas and guest rooms that are
more stringent than our standards for no-smoking guest rooms.
Fire Safety.
The federal Hotel and Motel Safety
Act of 1990 requires all places of public accommodation to
install hard wired, single station smoke detectors meeting
National Fire Protection Association Standard 74 in each guest
room and to install an automatic sprinkler system meeting
National Fire Protection Association Standard 13 or 13-R in
facilities taller than three stories, unless certain exceptions
are met, for such places to be approved for lodging and meetings
of federal employees. Travel directories published by the
federal government and lists maintained by state officials will
include only those facilities that comply with the Hotel and
Motel Safety Act of 1990. Other state and local fire and life
safety codes may require exit maps, lighting systems and other
safety measures unique to lodging facilities.
Occupational Safety.
The federal Occupational
Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, requires that businesses comply
with industry-specific safety and health standards, which are
known collectively as OSHA standards, to provide a safe work
environment for all employees and prevent work-related injuries,
illnesses and deaths. Failure to comply with such OSHA standards
may subject the lodging business to fines from the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration.
Environmental Regulation.
Our business that
relates to the management of property operations is subject to
various environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and similar
requirements in the jurisdictions where the properties we manage
are located. We must comply with environmental laws that
regulate pollution, hazardous and toxic substances and wastes,
asbestos, petroleum and storage tanks.
Where You
Can Find More Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the
Internet at the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Our SEC filings are also available on our website at
http://www.WyndhamWorldwide.com
as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or
furnished to the SEC. You may also read and copy any filed
document at the SECs public reference room in
Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about public reference rooms.
We maintain an Internet site at
http://www.WyndhamWorldwide.com.
Our website and the information contained on or connected to
that site are not incorporated into this annual report.
Before you invest in our securities you should carefully
consider each of the following risk factors and all of the other
information provided in this report. We believe that the
following information identifies the most significant risk
factors affecting us. However, the risks and uncertainties we
face are not limited to those set forth in the risk factors
described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we currently believe to be
immaterial may also adversely affect our business. In addition,
past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of
future performance and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends in future periods.
28
If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into
actual events, these events could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In such case, the trading price of our common stock could
decline.
The
hospitality industry is highly competitive and we are subject to
risks relating to competition that may adversely affect our
performance.
We will be adversely impacted if we cannot compete effectively
in the highly competitive hospitality industry. Our continued
success depends upon our ability to compete effectively in
markets that contain numerous competitors, some of which may
have significantly greater financial, marketing and other
resources than we have. Competition may reduce fee structures,
potentially causing us to lower our fees or prices, which may
adversely impact our profits. New competition or existing
competition that uses a business model that is different from
our business model may put pressure on us to change our model so
that we can remain competitive.
Our
revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and
declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those
caused by economic slowdown, terrorism, acts of God and war may
adversely affect us.
Declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely
impact us. Risks affecting the travel industry include: economic
slowdown and recession; economic factors, such as increased
costs of living and reduced discretionary income, adversely
impacting consumers and businesses decisions to use
and consume travel services and products; terrorist incidents
and threats (and associated heightened travel security
measures); acts of God (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, fires,
floods and other natural disasters); war; pandemics or threat of
pandemics; increased pricing, financial instability and capacity
constraints of air carriers; airline job actions and strikes;
and increases in gas and other fuel prices.
We are
subject to operating or other risks common to the hospitality
industry.
Our business is subject to numerous operating or other risks
common to the hospitality industry including:
|
|
|
changes in operating costs, including energy, labor costs
(including minimum wage increases and unionization),
workers compensation and health-care related costs and
insurance;
|
|
|
changes in desirability of geographic regions of the hotels or
resorts in our business;
|
|
|
changes in the supply and demand for hotel rooms, vacation
exchange and rental services and vacation ownership products and
services;
|
|
|
seasonality in our businesses may cause fluctuations in our
operating results;
|
|
|
geographic concentrations of our operations and customers;
|
|
|
increases in costs due to inflation that may not be fully offset
by price and fee increases in our business;
|
|
|
availability of acceptable financing and cost of capital as they
apply to us, our customers, current and potential hotel
franchisees and developers, owners of hotels with which we have
hotel management contracts, our RCI affiliates and other
developers of vacation ownership resorts;
|
|
|
our ability to securitize the receivables that we originate in
connection with sales of vacation ownership interests;
|
|
|
the risk that purchasers of vacation ownership interests who
finance a portion of the purchase price default on their loans
due to adverse macro or personal economic conditions or
otherwise, which would increase loan loss reserves and adversely
affect loan portfolio performance, each of which would
negatively impact our results of operations; that if such
defaults occur during the early part of the loan amortization
period we will not have recovered the marketing, selling,
administrative and other costs associated with such vacation
ownership interest; such costs will be incurred again in
connection with the resale of the repossessed vacation ownership
interest; and the value we recover in a default is not, in all
instances, sufficient to cover the outstanding debt;
|
|
|
the quality of the services provided by franchisees, our
vacation exchange and rentals business, resorts with units that
are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests may
adversely affect our image and reputation;
|
|
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash to buy from third-party
suppliers the products that we need to provide to the
participants in our points programs who want to redeem points
for such products;
|
|
|
overbuilding in one or more segments of the hospitality industry
and/or
in
one or more geographic regions;
|
29
|
|
|
changes in the number and occupancy rates of hotels operating
under franchise and management agreements;
|
|
|
changes in the relative mix of franchised hotels in the various
lodging industry price categories;
|
|
|
our ability to develop and maintain positive relations and
contractual arrangements with current and potential franchisees,
hotel owners, resorts with units that are exchanged through our
vacation exchange business
and/or
owners of vacation properties that our vacation rentals business
markets for rental;
|
|
|
the availability of and competition for desirable sites for the
development of vacation ownership properties; difficulties
associated with obtaining entitlements to develop vacation
ownership properties; liability under state and local laws with
respect to any construction defects in the vacation ownership
properties we develop; and our ability to adjust our pace of
completion of resort development relative to the pace of our
sales of the underlying vacation ownership interests;
|
|
|
private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely
affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange
businesses;
|
|
|
revenues from our lodging business are indirectly affected by
our franchisees pricing decisions;
|
|
|
organized labor activities and associated litigation;
|
|
|
maintenance and infringement of our intellectual property;
|
|
|
increases in the use of third-party Internet services to book
online hotel reservations could adversely impact our
revenues; and
|
|
|
disruptions in relationships with third parties, including
marketing alliances and affiliations with
e-commerce
channels.
|
We may
not be able to achieve our growth objectives.
We may not be able to achieve our objectives for increasing the
number of franchised
and/or
managed properties in our lodging business, the number of
vacation exchange members acquired by our vacation exchange
business, the number of rental weeks sold by our vacation
rentals business and the number of tours generated and vacation
ownership interests sold by our vacation ownership business.
We may be unable to identify acquisition targets that complement
our businesses, and if we are able to identify suitable
acquisition targets, we may not be able to complete acquisitions
on commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to complete
acquisitions depends on a variety of factors, including our
ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and requisite
government approvals. If we are able to complete acquisitions,
there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve the
revenue and cost benefits that we expected in connection with
such acquisitions or to successfully integrate the acquired
businesses into our existing operations.
Our
international operations are subject to risks not generally
applicable to our domestic operations.
Our international operations are subject to numerous risks
including: exposure to local economic conditions; potential
adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign countries
with the United States; hostility from local populations;
restrictions and taxes on the withdrawal of foreign investment
and earnings; government policies against businesses owned by
foreigners; investment restrictions or requirements; diminished
ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in foreign
countries; foreign exchange restrictions; fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates; local laws might conflict with
U.S. laws; withholding and other taxes on remittances and
other payments by subsidiaries; and changes in and application
of foreign taxation structures including value added taxes.
We are
subject to risks related to litigation filed by or against
us.
We are subject to a number of legal actions and the risk of
future litigation as described under Legal
Proceedings. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate
outcome and related damages and costs of litigation and other
proceedings filed by or against us. Adverse results in
litigation and other proceedings may harm our business.
We are
subject to certain risks related to our indebtedness, hedging
transactions, our securitization of assets, our surety bond
requirements, the cost and availability of capital and the
extension of credit by us.
We are a borrower of funds under our credit facilities, credit
lines, senior notes and securitization financings. We extend
credit when we finance purchases of vacation ownership
interests. We use financial instruments to reduce or hedge our
financial exposure to the effects of currency and interest rate
fluctuations. We are required to post surety bonds in connection
with our development activities. In connection with our debt
obligations, hedging
30
transactions, the securitization of certain of our assets, our
surety bond requirements and the extension of credit by us, we
are subject to numerous risks including:
|
|
|
our cash flows from operations or available lines of credit may
be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and
interest, which could result in a default and acceleration of
the underlying debt;
|
|
|
if we are unable to comply with the terms of the financial
covenants under our revolving credit facility, including a
breach of the financial ratios or tests, such non-compliance
could result in a default and acceleration of the underlying
revolver debt and other debt that is cross-defaulted to these
financial ratios;
|
|
|
our leverage may adversely affect our ability to obtain
additional financing;
|
|
|
our leverage may require the dedication of a significant portion
of our cash flows to the payment of principal and interest thus
reducing the availability of cash flows to fund working capital,
capital expenditures or other operating needs;
|
|
|
increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
rating agency downgrades for our debt that could increase our
borrowing costs;
|
|
|
failure or non-performance of counterparties for foreign
exchange and interest rate hedging transactions;
|
|
|
we may not be able to securitize our vacation ownership contract
receivables on terms acceptable to us because of, among other
factors, the performance of the vacation ownership contract
receivables, adverse conditions in the market for vacation
ownership loan-backed notes and asset-backed notes in general,
the credit quality and financial stability of insurers of
securitizations transactions, and the risk that the actual
amount of uncollectible accounts on our securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables and other credit we extend is
greater than expected;
|
|
|
our securitizations contain portfolio performance triggers
which, if violated, may result in a disruption or loss of cash
flow from such transactions;
|
|
|
a reduction in commitments from surety bond providers may impair
our vacation ownership business by requiring us to escrow cash
in order to meet regulatory requirements of certain states;
|
|
|
prohibitive cost and inadequate availability of capital could
restrict the development or acquisition of vacation ownership
resorts by us and the financing of purchases of vacation
ownership interests; and
|
|
|
if interest rates increase significantly, we may not be able to
increase the interest rate offered to finance purchases of
vacation ownership interests by the same amount of the increase.
|
Current
economic conditions in the hospitality industry and in the
global economy generally, including ongoing disruptions in the
debt and equity capital markets, may adversely affect our
business and results of operations, our ability to obtain
financing and/or securitize our receivables on reasonable and
acceptable terms, the performance of our loan portfolio and the
market price of our common stock.
The global economy is currently undergoing a slowdown, which
some observers view as a deepening recession, and the future
economic environment may continue to be less favorable than that
of recent years. The hospitality industry has experienced and
may continue to experience significant downturns in connection
with, or in anticipation of, declines in general economic
conditions. The current economic downturn has been characterized
by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate
earnings, lower business investment and lower consumer spending,
leading to lowered demand for hospitality products and resulting
in fewer customers visiting, and customers spending less at our
properties, which has adversely affected our revenues. In
addition, further declines in consumer and commercial spending
may drive us, our franchisees and our competitors to reduce
pricing, which would have a negative impact on our gross profit.
We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the
current disruptions in debt and equity capital markets and
adverse economic conditions in the United States and other
countries, which may continue to have an adverse effect on our
business and results of operations, in part because we are
dependent upon customer behavior and the impact on consumer
spending that the continued market disruption may have.
Moreover, reduced revenues as a result of a softening of the
economy may also reduce our working capital and interfere with
our long term business strategy.
The global stock and credit markets have recently experienced
significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity
disruptions, which have caused market prices of many stocks to
fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective and
outstanding debt financings to widen considerably. These
circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the
financial markets, making terms for certain financings
materially less attractive, and in certain cases have resulted
in the unavailability of certain types of financing. This
volatility and illiquidity has negatively affected a broad range
of mortgage and asset-backed and other fixed income securities.
As a result, the market for fixed income securities has
experienced decreased liquidity, increased price volatility,
credit downgrade events, and
31
increased defaults. Global equity markets have also been
experiencing heightened volatility and turmoil, with issuers
exposed to the credit markets particularly affected. These
factors and the continuing market disruption have an adverse
effect on us, in part because we, like many public companies,
from time to time raise capital in debt and equity capital
markets including in the asset-backed securities markets.
Our liquidity position may also be negatively affected if our
vacation ownership contract receivables portfolios do not meet
specified portfolio credit parameters. Our liquidity as it
relates to our vacation ownership contract receivables
securitization program could be adversely affected if we were to
fail to renew or replace any of the facilities on their renewal
dates or if a particular receivables pool were to fail to meet
certain ratios, which could occur in certain instances if the
default rates or other credit metrics of the underlying vacation
ownership contract receivables deteriorate. Our ability to sell
securities backed by our vacation ownership contract receivables
depends on the continued ability and willingness of capital
market participants to invest in such securities. Traditionally,
we had offered financing to purchasers of vacation ownership
interests and, similar to other companies that provide consumer
financing, we securitized a majority of the receivables
originated in connection with the sales of our vacation
ownership interests. We initially placed the financed contracts
into a revolving warehouse securitization facility generally
within 30 to 90 days after origination. Many of the
receivables were subsequently transferred from the warehouse
securitization facility and placed into term securitization
facilities. However, our ability to engage in these
securitization transactions on favorable terms or at all has
been adversely affected by the disruptions in the capital
markets and other events, including actions by rating agencies
and deteriorating investor expectations. It is possible that
asset-backed securities issued pursuant to our securitization
programs could in the future be downgraded by credit agencies.
If a downgrade occurs, our ability to complete other
securitization transactions on acceptable terms or at all could
be jeopardized, and we could be forced to rely on other
potentially more expensive and less attractive funding sources,
to the extent available, which would decrease our profitability
and may require us to adjust our business operations
accordingly, including reducing or suspending our financing to
purchasers of vacation ownership interests. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, we implemented a significant and deliberate
slowdown of our vacation ownership business and incurred a
non-cash goodwill impairment charge of approximately
$1.3 billion related to such reduction and to adverse
market conditions generally. While this goodwill impairment
charge has no impact on our cash balances, liquidity or cash
flows, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
effectively implement our new business strategies, and the
failure to do so could negatively affect our results of
operations, lead to further impairment charges and a further
reduction in stockholders equity.
In addition, continued uncertainty in the stock and credit
markets may negatively affect our ability to access additional
short-term and long-term financing, including future
securitization transactions, on reasonable terms or at all,
which would negatively impact our liquidity and financial
condition. In addition, if one or more of the financial
institutions that support our existing credit facilities fails,
we may not be able to find a replacement, which would negatively
impact our ability to borrow under the credit facilities. These
disruptions in the financial markets also may adversely affect
our credit rating and the market value of our common stock. If
the current pressures on credit continue or worsen, we may not
be able to refinance, if necessary, our outstanding debt when
due, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
While we believe we have adequate sources of liquidity to meet
our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt servicing
and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future, if our
operating results worsen significantly and our cash flow or
capital resources prove inadequate, or if interest rates
increase significantly, we could face liquidity problems that
could materially and adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition.
Several
of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and the
cost of compliance or failure to comply with such regulations
may adversely affect us.
Our businesses are heavily regulated by the states or provinces
(including local governments) and countries in which our
operations are conducted. In addition, domestic and foreign
federal, state and local regulators may enact new laws and
regulations that may reduce our revenues, cause our expenses to
increase
and/or
require us to modify substantially our business practices. If we
are not in substantial compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including, among others, franchising, timeshare,
lending, privacy, marketing and sales, telemarketing, licensing,
labor, employment and immigration, gaming, environmental and
regulations applicable under the Office of Foreign Asset Control
and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, we may be subject to
regulatory actions, fines, penalties and potential criminal
prosecution.
We are
dependent on our senior management.
We believe that our future growth depends, in part, on the
continued services of our senior management team. Losing the
services of any members of our senior management team could
adversely affect our strategic and customer relationships and
impede our ability to execute our growth strategies.
32
Our
inability to adequately protect our intellectual property could
adversely affect our business.
Our inability to adequately protect our trademarks, trade dress
and other intellectual property rights could adversely affect
our business. We generate, maintain, utilize and enforce a
substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress and other
intellectual property that are fundamental to the brands that we
use in all of our businesses. There can be no assurance that the
steps we take to protect our intellectual property will be
adequate.
Disruptions
and other impairment of our information technologies and systems
could adversely affect our business.
Any disaster, disruption or other impairment in our technology
capabilities could harm our business. Our businesses depend upon
the use of sophisticated information technologies and systems,
including technology and systems utilized for reservation
systems, vacation exchange systems, property management,
communications, procurement, member record databases, call
centers, operation of our loyalty programs and administrative
systems. The operation, maintenance and updating of these
technologies and systems is dependent upon internal and
third-party technologies, systems and services for which there
is no assurance of uninterrupted availability or adequate
protection.
Failure
to maintain the security of personally identifiable information
could adversely affect us.
In connection with our business we and our service providers
collect and retain significant volumes of personally
identifiable information, including credit card numbers of our
customers and other personally identifiable information of our
customers, stockholders and employees. Our customers,
stockholders and employees expect that we will adequately
protect their personal information, and the regulatory
environment surrounding information security and privacy is
increasingly demanding, both in the United States and other
jurisdictions in which we operate. A significant theft, loss or
fraudulent use of customer, stockholder, employee or Company
data by cybercrime or otherwise could adversely impact our
reputation and could result in significant costs, fines and
litigation.
The
market price of our shares may fluctuate.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate depending
upon many factors some of which may be beyond our control,
including: our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other
companies in our industry; actual or anticipated fluctuations in
our operating results due to seasonality and other factors
related to our business; changes in accounting principles or
rules; announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions or dispositions; the failure of securities analysts
to cover our common stock; changes in earnings estimates by
securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates; the
operating and stock price performance of other comparable
companies; overall market fluctuations; and general economic
conditions. Stock markets in general have experienced volatility
that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a
particular company. These broad market fluctuations may
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Your
percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in the
future.
Your percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in
the future because of equity awards that we expect will be
granted over time to our directors, officers and employees as
well as due to the exercise of options issued. In addition, our
Board may issue shares of our common and preferred stock, and
debt securities convertible into shares of our common and
preferred stock, up to certain regulatory thresholds without
shareholder approval.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and under Delaware
law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our Company, which
could impact the trading price of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and Delaware law
contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover
practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices
or bids unacceptably expensive and to encourage prospective
acquirors to negotiate with our Board rather than to attempt a
hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others: a
Board of Directors that is divided into three classes with
staggered terms; elimination of the right of our stockholders to
act by written consent; rules regarding how stockholders may
present proposals or nominate directors for election at
stockholder meetings; the right of our Board to issue preferred
stock without stockholder approval; and limitations on the right
of stockholders to remove directors. Delaware law also imposes
restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between
us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.
33
We cannot
provide assurance that we will continue to pay
dividends.
There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient surplus
under Delaware law to be able to continue to pay dividends. This
may result from extraordinary cash expenses, actual expenses
exceeding contemplated costs, funding of capital expenditures or
increases in reserves. Our Board of Directors may also suspend
the payment of dividends if the Board deems such action to be in
the best interests of the Company or stockholders. If we do not
pay dividends, the price of our common stock must appreciate for
you to realize a gain on your investment in Wyndham Worldwide.
This appreciation may not occur, and our stock may in fact
depreciate in value.
We are
responsible for certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities.
Under the separation agreement and the tax sharing agreement
that we executed with Cendant (now Avis Budget Group) and former
Cendant units, Realogy and Travelport, we and Realogy generally
are responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of certain of
Cendants contingent and other corporate liabilities and
associated costs, including taxes imposed on Cendant and certain
other subsidiaries and certain contingent and other corporate
liabilities of Cendant
and/or
its
subsidiaries to the extent incurred on or prior to
August 23, 2006, including liabilities relating to certain
of Cendants terminated or divested businesses, the
Travelport sale, the Cendant litigation described in this report
under Cendant Litigation, actions with respect to
the separation plan and payments under certain contracts that
were not allocated to any specific party in connection with the
separation. In addition, each of us, Cendant, and Realogy may be
responsible for 100% of certain of Cendants tax
liabilities that will provide the responsible party with a
future, offsetting tax benefit.
If any party responsible for the liabilities described above
were to default on its obligations, each non-defaulting party
(including Avis Budget) would be required to pay an equal
portion of the amounts in default. Accordingly, we could, under
certain circumstances, be obligated to pay amounts in excess of
our share of the assumed obligations related to such liabilities
including associated costs. On or about April 10, 2007,
Realogy Corporation was acquired by affiliates of Apollo
Management VI, L.P. and its stock is no longer publicly traded.
The acquisition does not negate Realogys obligation to
satisfy 62.5% of such contingent and other corporate liabilities
of Cendant or its subsidiaries pursuant to the term of the
separation agreement. As a result of the acquisition, however,
Realogy has greater debt obligations and its ability to satisfy
its portion of these liabilities may be adversely impacted. In
accordance with the terms of the separation agreement, Realogy
posted a letter of credit in April 2007 for our benefit and
Cendant to cover its estimated share of the assumed liabilities
discussed above, although there can be no assurance that such
letter of credit will be sufficient to cover Realogys
actual obligations if and when they arise.
As discussed below, the IRS has commenced an audit of
Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006, during which we
were included in Cendants tax returns.
The rules governing taxation are complex and subject to varying
interpretations. Therefore, our tax accruals reflect a series of
complex judgments about future events and rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the estimates
and assumptions supporting our tax accruals are reasonable, tax
audits and any related litigation could result in tax
liabilities for us that are materially different than those
reflected in our historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. The result of an audit or litigation
could have a material adverse effect on our income tax
provision, net income,
and/or
cash
flows in the period or periods to which such audit or litigation
relates.
As mentioned above, the IRS has commenced an audit of
Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006, during which we
were included in Cendants tax returns. Our recorded tax
liabilities in respect of such taxable years represent our
current best estimates of the probable outcome with respect to
certain tax positions taken by Cendant for which we would be
responsible under the tax sharing agreement. As discussed above,
however, the rules governing taxation are complex and subject to
varying interpretation. There can be no assurance that the IRS
will not propose adjustments to the returns for which we would
be responsible under the tax sharing agreement or that any such
proposed adjustments would not be material. Any determination by
the IRS or a court that imposed tax liabilities on us under the
tax sharing agreement in excess of our tax accruals could have a
material adverse effect on our income tax provision, net income,
and/or
cash
flows.
We may be
required to write-off a portion of the remaining goodwill value
of companies we have acquired.
Under generally accepted accounting principles, we review our
intangible assets, including goodwill, for impairment at least
annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that may be
considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the
carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets may
not be recoverable, include a sustained decline in our stock
price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow
estimates, and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be
required to record a significant non-cash impairment charge in
our financial statements during the period in which any
34
impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets is
determined, negatively impacting our results of operations and
stockholders equity.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our corporate headquarters is located in a leased office at 22
Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey, which lease expires in
2024. We also lease other Parsippany-based offices, which leases
have varying expiration dates. We have a leased office in
Virginia Beach, Virginia for our Employee Service Center, which
lease expires in 2011.
Wyndham
Hotel Group
The main corporate operations of our lodging business shares
office space at a building leased by the Corporate Services team
in Parsippany, New Jersey. Our lodging business also leases
space for its reservations centers
and/or
data
warehouse in Aberdeen, South Dakota; Phoenix, Arizona;
Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada and Saint John, New
Brunswick, Canada pursuant to leases that expire in 2010, 2010,
2012 and 2013, respectively. In addition, our lodging business
leases office space in Rosemont, Illinois expiring in 2015;
Atlanta, Georgia expiring in 2012; Dallas, Texas expiring in
2013; Mission Viejo, CA expiring in 2013; Hong Kong, China
expiring in 2010; London, United Kingdom expiring in 2012 and
Shanghai, China expiring in 2010.
Group
RCI
Our vacation exchange business has its main corporate operations
at a leased office in Parsippany, New Jersey, which lease
expires in 2011. Our vacation exchange business also owns six
properties located in the following cities: Carmel, Indiana;
Cork, Ireland; Kettering, United Kingdom; Mexico City, Mexico;
Monteriggioni, Italy; and Albufeira, Portugal. Our vacation
exchange business also has one other leased office located
within the United States pursuant to a lease that expires in
2009 and 29 additional leased spaces in various countries
outside the United States pursuant to leases that expire
generally between 1 and 3 years except for 6 leases that
expire between 2012 and 2019. Our vacation rentals
business operations are managed in two owned locations
(Earby, United Kingdom and Monterrigioni, Italy, which is
co-located with our vacation exchange business above); three
main leased locations pursuant to leases that expire in 2015,
2012, and 2010, (Leidschendam, Netherlands; Dunfermline, United
Kingdom; and Hellerup, Denmark, respectively) as well as five
smaller owned offices and 34 smaller leased offices throughout
Europe. The vacation exchange and rentals business also occupies
space in London, United Kingdom pursuant to a lease that expires
in 2012.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership
Our vacation ownership business has its main corporate
operations in Orlando, Florida pursuant to several leases, which
expire beginning 2012. Our vacation ownership business also owns
a contact center facility in Redmond, Washington. Our vacation
ownership business leases space for administrative functions in
Redmond, Washington expiring in 2013; various locations in Las
Vegas, Nevada expiring between 2011 and 2017; and Margate,
Florida expiring in 2010. In addition, the vacation ownership
business leases approximately 112 marketing and sales offices,
of which approximately 101 are throughout the United States with
various expiration dates, 9 offices are in Australia expiring
within approximately two years, and one office in New Zealand
expiring in 2010 and one office in Canada expiring in 2010.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
Wyndham
Worldwide Litigation
We are involved in claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of our business including but not limited to:
for our lodging businessbreach of contract, fraud and bad
faith claims between franchisors and franchisees in connection
with franchise agreements and with owners in connection with
management contracts, as well as consumer protection claims,
fraud and other statutory claims and negligence claims asserted
in connection with alleged acts or occurrences at franchised or
managed properties; for our vacation exchange and rentals
businessbreach of contract claims by both affiliates and
members in connection with their respective agreements, bad
faith, and consumer protection, fraud and other statutory claims
asserted by members and negligence claims by guests for alleged
injuries sustained at resorts; for our vacation ownership
businessbreach of contract, bad faith, conflict of
interest, fraud, consumer protection claims and other statutory
claims by property owners associations, owners and
prospective owners in connection with the sale or use of
vacation ownership interests, land or the management of vacation
ownership resorts, construction defect claims relating to
vacation ownership units or resorts
35
and negligence claims by guests for alleged injuries sustained
at vacation ownership units or resorts; and for each of our
businesses, bankruptcy proceedings involving efforts to collect
receivables from a debtor in bankruptcy, tax claims, employment
matters involving claims of discrimination, harassment and wage
and hour claims, claims of infringement upon third parties
intellectual property rights and environmental claims.
Cendant
Litigation
Under the Separation Agreement, we agreed to be responsible for
37.5% of certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities and associated costs, including certain
contingent litigation. Since the Separation, Cendant settled the
majority of the lawsuits pending on the date of the Separation.
The pending Cendant contingent litigation that we deem to be
material is further discussed in Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
Not applicable.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Price of Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol WYN. At
January 31, 2009, the number of stockholders of record was
approximately 6,489. The following table sets forth the
quarterly high and low closing sales prices per share of WYN
common stock as reported by the NYSE for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.94
|
|
|
$
|
19.25
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
24.21
|
|
|
|
17.91
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
20.55
|
|
|
|
14.88
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
15.29
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
35.48
|
|
|
$
|
29.95
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
38.04
|
|
|
|
34.40
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
38.69
|
|
|
|
28.32
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
33.46
|
|
|
|
23.56
|
|
Dividend
Policy
We currently pay a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share on each
share of Common Stock issued and outstanding on the record date
for the applicable dividend. The declaration and payment of
future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon many
factors, including our financial condition, earnings, capital
requirements of our business, covenants associated with certain
debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints,
industry practice and other factors that our Board deems
relevant. There can be no assurance that a payment of a dividend
will or will not occur in the future.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. The Board of
Directors authorization included increased repurchase
capacity for proceeds received from stock option exercises.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, repurchase
capacity increased $5 million from proceeds received from
stock option exercises. We suspended such program during the
third quarter of 2008 and expect to defer further share
repurchases until the macro-economic outlook and credit
environment are more favorable. We currently have
$155 million remaining availability in our program. The
amount and timing of specific repurchases are subject to market
conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors.
Repurchases may be conducted in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions.
36
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities remaining
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
available for future issuance under
|
|
|
|
|
to be issued upon exercise
|
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
equity compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
of outstanding options,
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
(excluding securities reflected in
|
|
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
the first column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
17.0 million
|
(a)
|
|
|
$34.06
(b)
|
|
|
|
22.1 million
|
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Consists of shares issuable upon
exercise of outstanding stock options, stock settled stock
appreciation rights and restricted stock units under the 2006
Equity and Incentive Plan.
|
(b)
|
|
Consists of weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding stock options and stock settled
stock appreciation rights.
|
(c)
|
|
Consists of shares available for
future grants under the 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan.
|
Stock
Performance Graph
The Stock Performance Graph is not deemed filed with the SEC
and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any of
our prior or future filings made with the SEC.
The following line graph compares the cumulative total
stockholder return of our common stock against the S&P 500
Index, the S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Index (consisting of Carnival plc, Marriott International Inc.,
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation) and a peer group (consisting of Marriott
International Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc. and
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.) for the
period from August 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008 . The
graph assumes that $100 was invested on August 1, 2006 and
all dividends and other distributions were reinvested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
|
8/06
|
|
|
12/06
|
|
|
12/07
|
|
|
12/08
|
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
100.53
|
|
|
$
|
74.17
|
|
|
$
|
20.96
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
112.05
|
|
|
|
118.21
|
|
|
|
74.47
|
|
S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
126.79
|
|
|
|
111.05
|
|
|
|
57.61
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
125.81
|
|
|
|
91.43
|
|
|
|
50.58
|
|
37
ITEM 6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For The Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and
other
(a)
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
Goodwill and other impairments
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Provision for income
taxes
(b)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per
Share
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
assets
(d)
|
|
$
|
2,906
|
|
|
$
|
2,596
|
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,159
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,573
|
|
|
|
10,459
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
Securitized debt
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
Total stockholders/ invested
equity
(e)
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms
(g)
|
|
|
592,900
|
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
|
|
532,700
|
|
|
|
521,200
|
|
RevPAR
(h)
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
|
$
|
27.55
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation revenue (in
000s)
(i)
|
|
$
|
482,709
|
|
|
$
|
489,041
|
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
$
|
408,620
|
|
|
$
|
371,058
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s)
(j)
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member
(k)
|
|
$
|
128.37
|
|
|
$
|
135.85
|
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
$
|
135.76
|
|
|
$
|
134.82
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s)
(l)
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental
(m)
|
|
$
|
463.10
|
|
|
$
|
422.83
|
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
$
|
359.27
|
|
|
$
|
328.77
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Vacation Ownership Interest (VOI) sales (in
000s)
(n)
|
|
$
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,254,000
|
|
Tours
(o)
|
|
|
1,143,000
|
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
934,000
|
|
|
|
859,000
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG)
(p)
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes operating, cost of
vacation ownership interests, consumer financing interest,
marketing and reservation and general and administrative
expenses. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, general and administrative
expenses include $18 million, $46 million and
$32 million of a net benefit from the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets
($6 million, $26 million and $30 million,
after-tax), respectively. During 2008, general and
administrative expenses include charges of $24 million
($24 million, after-tax) due to currency conversion losses
related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations
at our vacation exchange and rentals business.
|
(b)
|
|
The difference in our 2008
effective tax rate is primarily due to (i) the
non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge recorded
during 2008, (ii) charges in a tax-free zone resulting from
currency conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from
our Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business and (iii) a non-cash impairment charge related to
the write-off of an investment in a non-performing joint venture
at our vacation exchange and rentals business. See
Note 7Income Taxes for a detailed reconciliation of
our effective tax rate.
|
(c)
|
|
This calculation is based on basic
and diluted weighted average shares of 178 million during
2008 and 181 million and 183 million, respectively,
during 2007. For all periods prior to our date of Separation
(July 31, 2006), weighted average shares were calculated as
one share of Wyndham common stock outstanding for every five
shares of Cendant common stock outstanding as of July 21,
2006, the record date for the distribution of Wyndham common
stock. As such, during 2006, this calculation is based on basic
and diluted weighted average shares of 198 million and
199 million, respectively. During 2004 and 2005, this
calculation is based on basic and diluted weighted average
shares of 200.
|
(d)
|
|
Represents the portion of gross
vacation ownership contract receivables and securitization
restricted cash that collateralize our securitized debt. Refer
to Note 13 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements for further information.
|
(e)
|
|
Represents Wyndham Worldwides
stand-alone stockholders equity since August 1, 2006
and Cendants invested equity (capital contributions and
earnings from operations less dividends) in Wyndham Worldwide
and accumulated other comprehensive income for 2004 through
July 31, 2006, our date of Separation.
|
38
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Ramada International was acquired
on December 10, 2004, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts was
acquired on October 11, 2005, Baymont Inn &
Suites was acquired on April 7, 2006 and U.S. Franchise
Systems, Inc. and its Microtel Inns & Suites and
Hawthorn Suites hotel brands was acquired on July 18, 2008.
The results of operations of these businesses have been included
from their acquisition dates forward.
|
(g)
|
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the year which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or
other services provided and (iii) properties managed under
the CHI Limited joint venture. The amounts in 2008, 2007 and
2006 include 4,175, 6,856 and 4,993 affiliated rooms,
respectively.
|
(h)
|
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied for the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(i)
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenues are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
(j)
|
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such members are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain members may exchange
intervals for other leisure-related products and services.
|
(k)
|
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated during the
year divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year.
|
(l)
|
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
(m)
|
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
|
(n)
|
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
(o)
|
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(p)
|
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding
tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by
the number of tours.
|
In presenting the financial data above in conformity with
general accepted accounting principles, we are required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial Condition,
Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCritical Accounting
Policies, for a detailed discussion of the accounting
policies that we believe require subjective and complex
judgments that could potentially affect reported results.
Acquisitions
(2004 2008)
Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2008, we
completed the following acquisitions, the results of operations
and financial position of which have been included beginning
from the relevant acquisition dates:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. and its Microtel
Inns & Suites and Hawthorn Suites hotel brands (2008)
|
|
|
|
Baymont Inn & Suites brand (2006)
|
|
|
|
A vacation ownership and resort management business (2006)
|
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand (2005)
|
|
|
|
Two Flags Joint Venture LLC (2004)
|
|
|
|
Ramada International (2004)
|
|
|
|
Landal GreenParks (2004)
|
|
|
|
Canvas Holidays Limited (2004)
|
See Note 4 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements for a more detailed discussion of the acquisitions
completed during 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Charges
During 2008, we committed to various strategic realignment
initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs, enhancing
organizational efficiency and consolidating and rationalizing
existing processes and facilities. As a result, we recorded
$79 million of restructuring costs during 2008, of which
$56 million has been or is expected to be paid in cash. See
Note 21 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements for further details.
During 2008, we recorded a charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, after-tax) to impair goodwill related to
plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008 to reduce our
VOI sales pace and associated size of our vacation ownership
business. In addition, we recorded charges of
(i) $84 million to reduce the carrying value of
certain long-lived assets based on their revised estimated fair
values and (ii) $24 million due to currency conversion
losses related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuelan
operations at our vacation exchange and rentals business. See
Note 21 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements for further details. During 2006, we recorded a
non-cash charge of $65 million, after tax, to reflect the
cumulative effect of accounting changes as a result of our
adoption of Statement of Financial Standards (SFAS)
No. 152, Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing
Transactions (SFAS No. 152) and
Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time- Sharing
Transactions
(SOP 04-2)
on January 1, 2006. See Note 2 to the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements for further details.
39
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements, as
that term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in its rules, regulations and releases. Forward-looking
statements are any statements other than statements of
historical fact, including statements regarding our
expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding
the future. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as may,
expects, should, believes,
plans, anticipates,
estimates, predicts,
potential, continue, or other words of
similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in, or implied by, the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, general economic
conditions, our financial and business prospects, our capital
requirements, our financing prospects, our relationships with
associates, and those disclosed as risks under Risk
Factors in Part I, Item 1A, above. We caution
readers that any such statements are based on currently
available operational, financial and competitive information,
and they should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements
opinion only as of the date on which they were made. Except as
required by law, we disclaim any obligation to review or update
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances as they occur.
BUSINESS
AND OVERVIEW
We are a global provider of hospitality products and services
and operate our business in the following three segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
franchises hotels in the upscale,
midscale, economy and extended stay segments of the lodging
industry and provides property management services to owners of
our luxury, upscale and midscale hotels.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
provides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and markets
vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of independent
owners.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Ownership
develops, markets and
sells VOIs to individual consumers, provides consumer financing
in connection with the sale of VOIs and provides property
management services at resorts.
|
The general health of the hospitality industry is affected by
the performance of the U.S. economy. In 2008, the
U.S. economy experienced real GDP growth of approximately
1.5%. In 2009, U.S. real GDP is expected to decline by
approximately 0.5%. During 2008, total travel expenditures in
the United States were projected to be an estimated
$785.5 billion, which represents an increase of
approximately 6.5% from 2007. For 2009, total travel
expenditures by domestic and international travelers in the
United States are projected to be an estimated
$762.3 billion, which represents a decrease of
approximately 3.0% from projected expenditures during 2008.
Separation
from Cendant
On July 31, 2006, Cendant Corporation (or former
Parent) distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common
stock to the holders of Cendant common stock issued and
outstanding on July 21, 2006, the record date for the
distribution. On August 1, 2006, we commenced regular
way trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol WYN.
Before our separation from Cendant, we entered into separation,
transition services and several other agreements with Cendant,
Realogy and Travelport to effect the separation and
distribution, govern the relationships among the parties after
the separation and allocate among the parties Cendants
assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods
prior to the separation. Under the Separation and Distribution
Agreement, we assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other
corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries which were
not primarily related to our business or the businesses of
Realogy, Travelport or Avis Budget, and Realogy assumed 62.5% of
these contingent and other corporate liabilities. These include
liabilities relating to Cendants terminated or divested
businesses, the Travelport sale on August 22, 2006, taxes
of Travelport for taxable periods through the date of the
Travelport sale, certain litigation matters, generally any
actions relating to the separation plan and payments under
certain contracts that were not allocated to any specific party
in connection with the separation.
On December 15, 2006, Realogy entered into an agreement and
plan of merger with an affiliate of Apollo Management VI, L.P.
(Apollo) and, on April 10, 2007, Realogy
announced that affiliates of Apollo had completed the merger.
Although Realogy no longer trades as a public company, the
merger does not negate Realogys obligation to satisfy
62.5% of certain contingent and other corporate liabilities of
Cendant or its subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of the
separation agreement. As a result of the sale, Realogys
senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below investment
grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy experienced
such a change of
40
control and suffered such a ratings downgrade, it was required
to post a letter of credit in an amount acceptable to us and
Avis Budget Group to satisfy the fair value of Realogys
indemnification obligations for the Cendant legacy contingent
liabilities in the event Realogy does not otherwise satisfy such
obligations to the extent they become due. On April 26,
2007, Realogy posted a $500 million irrevocable standby
letter of credit from a major commercial bank in favor of Avis
Budget Group and upon which demand may be made if Realogy does
not otherwise satisfy its obligations for its share of the
Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The letter of credit can
be adjusted from time to time based upon the outstanding
contingent liabilities and has an expiration of September 2013,
subject to renewal and certain provisions. The issuance of this
letter of credit does not relieve or limit Realogys
obligations for these liabilities.
Because we now conduct our business as a separate stand-alone
public company, our historical financial information does not
reflect what our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows would have been had we been a separate stand-alone
public company during the periods presented. Therefore, the
historical financial information for such periods may not
necessarily be indicative of what our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows will be in the future and may
not be comparable to periods ending after July 31, 2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Lodging
We enter into agreements to franchise our lodging franchise
systems to independent hotel owners. Our standard franchise
agreement typically has a term of 15 to 20 years and
provides a franchisee with certain rights to terminate the
franchise agreement before the term of the agreement under
certain circumstances. The principal source of revenues from
franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are
comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to marketing
and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are
based on a percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised
hotel and are accrued as earned and upon becoming due from the
franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees
is charged to bad debt expense and included in operating
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Operations. Lodging revenues also include initial franchise
fees, which are recognized as revenue when all material services
or conditions have been substantially performed, which is either
when a franchised hotel opens for business or when a franchise
agreement is terminated as it has been determined that the
franchised hotel will not open.
Our franchise agreements also require the payment of fees for
certain services, including marketing and reservations. With
such fees, we provide our franchised properties with a suite of
operational and administrative services, including access to
(i) an international, centralized, brand-specific
reservations system, (ii) advertising,
(iii) promotional and co-marketing programs,
(iv) referrals, (v) technology, (vi) training and
(vii) volume purchasing. We are contractually obligated to
expend the marketing and reservation fees we collect from
franchisees in accordance with the franchise agreements; as
such, revenues earned in excess of costs incurred are accrued as
a liability for future marketing or reservation costs. Costs
incurred in excess of revenues are expensed as incurred. In
accordance with our franchise agreements, we include an
allocation of costs required to carry out marketing and
reservation activities within marketing and reservation expenses.
We also provide property management services for hotels under
management contracts. Our standard management agreement
typically has a term of up to 20 years. Our management fees
are comprised of base fees, which are typically calculated based
upon a specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel
operations, and incentive fees, which are typically calculated
based upon a specified percentage of a hotels gross
operating profit. Management fee revenue is recognized when
earned in accordance with the terms of the contract. We incur
certain reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel properties
and reports reimbursements received from managed properties as
revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses.
Management fee revenues are recorded as a component of franchise
fee revenues and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The costs,
which principally relate to payroll costs for operational
employees who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. The reimbursements from hotel owners
are based upon the costs incurred with no added margin; as a
result, these reimbursable costs have little to no effect on our
operating income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
payroll reimbursements were $5 million and
$100 million, respectively, during 2008, $6 million
and $92 million, respectively, during 2007 and
$4 million and $69 million, respectively, during 2006.
We also earn revenue from administering the Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program. We charge our franchisee/managed property owner
a fee based upon a percentage of room revenue generated from
member stays at participating hotels. This fee is accrued as
earned and upon becoming due from the franchisee.
Within our Lodging segment, we measure operating performance
using the following key operating statistics: (i) number of
rooms, which represents the number of rooms at lodging
properties at the end of the year, (ii) RevPAR,
41
which is calculated by multiplying the percentage of available
rooms occupied for the year by the average rate charged for
renting a lodging room for one day and (iii) royalty,
marketing and reservation revenues, which are typically based on
a percentage of the gross room revenues of each franchised hotel.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, we enter into
affiliation agreements with developers of vacation ownership
properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their intervals
for certain other intervals within our vacation exchange
business and, for some members, for other leisure-related
products and services. Additionally, as a marketer of vacation
rental properties, generally we enter into contracts for
exclusive periods of time with property owners to market the
rental of such properties to rental customers. Our vacation
exchange business derives a majority of its revenues from annual
membership dues and exchange fees from members trading their
intervals. Annual dues revenue represents the annual membership
fees from members who participate in our vacation exchange
business and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange
their intervals for certain other intervals within our vacation
exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. We record revenue from
annual membership dues as deferred income on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and recognize it on a straight-line basis over
the membership period during which delivery of publications, if
applicable, and other services are provided to the members.
Exchange fees are generated when members exchange their
intervals for equivalent values of rights and services, which
may include intervals at other properties within our vacation
exchange business or other leisure-related products and
services. Exchange fees are recognized as revenue, net of
expected cancellations, when the exchange requests have been
confirmed to the member. Our vacation rentals business primarily
derives its revenues from fees, which generally average between
20% and 45% of the gross booking fees for non-proprietary
inventory, as compared to properties that we own or operate
under long-term capital leases where we receive 100% of the
revenue. The majority of the time, we act on behalf of the
owners of the rental properties to generate our fees. We provide
reservation services to the independent property owners and
receive the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. We remit the gross rental fee
received from the renter to the independent property owner, net
of our
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2008,
2007 and 2006 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions
booked. Our revenue is earned when evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or the services have been
rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. We also
earn rental fees in connection with properties we own or operate
under long-term capital leases and such fees are recognized when
the rental customers stay occurs, as this is the point at
which the service is rendered.
Within our Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment, we measure
operating performance using the following key operating
statistics: (i) average number of vacation exchange
members, which represents members in our vacation exchange
programs who pay annual membership dues and are entitled, for
additional fees, to exchange their intervals for intervals at
other properties affiliated within our vacation exchange
business and, for certain members, for other leisure-related
products and services, (ii) annual membership dues and
exchange revenue per member, which represents the total annual
dues and exchange fees generated for the year divided by the
average number of vacation exchange members during the year,
(iii) vacation rental transactions, which represents the
number of transactions that are generated in connection with
customers booking their vacation rental stays through us and
(iv) average net price per vacation rental, which
represents the net rental price generated from renting vacation
properties to customers divided by the number of rental
transactions.
Vacation
Ownership
We develop, market and sell VOIs to individual consumers,
provide property management services at resorts and provide
consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs. Our
vacation ownership business derives the majority of its revenues
from sales of VOIs and derives other revenues from consumer
financing and property management. Our sales of VOIs are either
cash sales or seller-financed sales. In order for us to
recognize revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method of
accounting described in SFAS No. 66, Accounting
of Sales of Real Estate for fully constructed inventory, a
binding sales contract must have been executed, the statutory
rescission period must have expired (after which time the
purchasers are not entitled to a refund except for nondelivery
by us), receivables must have been deemed collectible and the
remainder of our obligations must have been substantially
completed. In addition, before we recognize any revenues on VOI
sales, the purchaser of the VOI must have met the initial
investment criteria and, as applicable, the continuing
investment criteria, by executing a legally binding financing
contract. A purchaser has met the initial investment criteria
when a minimum down payment of 10% is received by us. As a
result of the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into consideration
the fair value of certain incentives provided to the purchaser
when assessing the adequacy of the purchasers initial
investment. In those cases where financing is provided to the
purchaser by us, the purchaser is
42
obligated to remit monthly payments under financing contracts
that represent the purchasers continuing investment. The
contractual terms of seller-provided financing agreements
require that the contractual level of annual principal payments
be sufficient to amortize the loan over a customary period for
the VOI being financed, which is generally ten years, and
payments under the financing contracts begin within 45 days
of the sale and receipt of the minimum down payment of 10%. If
all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the percentage-of-completion method
of accounting provided that the preliminary construction phase
is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met (to
assure that the property will not revert to a rental property).
The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be complete
when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to the sale
are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract is
cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable expenses
are charged to operating expense in the current period on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.
We also offer consumer financing as an option to customers
purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by the
underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for ten
years. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is recorded at the
time of the sale with a charge to the provision for loan losses
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. Upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The
interest income earned from the financing arrangements is earned
on the principal balance outstanding over the life of the
arrangement and is recorded within consumer financing on the
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations.
We also provide day-to-day-management services, including
oversight of housekeeping services, maintenance and certain
accounting and administrative services for property owners
associations and clubs. In some cases, our employees serve as
officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Operations. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll
costs for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where we are the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. Reimbursements are based upon the
costs incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of
these reimbursable costs has little to no effect on our
operating income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
reimbursements was $159 million and $187 million,
respectively, during 2008, $146 million and
$164 million, respectively, during 2007 and
$112 million and $141 million, respectively, during
2006. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, one of the associations that
we manage paid Group RCI $17 million, $15 million and
$13 million, respectively, for exchange services.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, gross sales of VOIs were reduced by
$75 million, $22 million and $22 million,
respectively, representing the net change in revenue that is
deferred under the percentage of completion method of
accounting. Under the percentage of completion method of
accounting, a portion of the total revenue from a vacation
ownership contract sale is not recognized if the construction of
the vacation resort has not yet been fully completed. Such
revenue will be recognized in future periods in proportion to
the costs incurred as compared to the total expected costs for
completion of construction of the vacation resort.
Within our Vacation Ownership segment, we measure operating
performance using the following key metrics:
(i) gross VOI sales (including tele-sales upgrades,
which are a component of upgrade sales) before deferred sales
and loan loss provisions, (ii) tours, which represents the
number of tours taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs and
(iii) volume per guest, or VPG, which represents revenue
per guest and is calculated by dividing the gross VOI
sales, excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales, by the number of tours.
Other
Items
We record lodging-related marketing and reservation revenues,
Wyndham Rewards revenues, as well as property management
services revenues for both our Lodging and Vacation Ownership
segments, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
43
Discussed below are our consolidated and combined results of
operations and the results of operations for each of our
reportable segments. The reportable segments presented below
represent our operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which is utilized on a regular
basis by our chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying our
reportable segments, we also consider the nature of services
provided by our operating segments. Management evaluates the
operating results of each of our reportable segments based upon
revenue and EBITDA, which is defined as net
income/(loss) before depreciation and amortization, interest
expense (excluding interest on securitized vacation ownership
debt), interest income, income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change, net of tax, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. We believe
that EBITDA is a useful measure of performance for our industry
segments which, when considered with GAAP measures, gives a more
complete understanding of our operating performance. Our
presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly-titled
measures used by other companies.
For the period January 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006,
Cendant allocated $20 million of general corporate overhead
costs to us based on a percentage of our forecasted revenues.
General corporate expense allocations included costs related to
Cendants executive management, tax, accounting, legal,
treasury and cash management, certain employee benefits and real
estate usage for common space. The allocations were not
necessarily indicative of the actual expenses that would have
been incurred had we been operating as a separate, stand-alone
public company for the periods presented.
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
% Change
|
|
Lodging
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms
(b)
|
|
|
592,900
|
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
RevPAR
(c)
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation revenues (in
000s)
(d)
|
|
$
|
482,709
|
|
|
$
|
489,041
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members
(000s)
(e)
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member
(f)
|
|
$
|
128.37
|
|
|
$
|
135.85
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s)
(g)
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Average net price per vacation
rental
(h)
|
|
$
|
463.10
|
|
|
$
|
422.83
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales (in
000s)
(i)
|
|
$
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tours
(j)
|
|
|
1,143,000
|
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG)
(k)
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes Microtel Inns &
Suites and Hawthorn Suites hotel brands, which were acquired on
July 18, 2008. Therefore, the operating statistics for 2008
are not presented on a comparable basis to the 2007 operating
statistics. On a comparable basis (excluding the Microtel
Inns & Suites and Hawthorn Suites hotel brands from
the 2008 amounts), the number of rooms would have increased 2%
and RevPAR would have declined 2%.
|
(b)
|
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the period which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or other
services provided and (iii) properties managed under the
CHI Limited joint venture. The amounts in 2008 and 2007 include
4,175 and 6,856 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
(c)
|
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the period by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(d)
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenues are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each hotel. Royalty revenue is generally a fee
charged to each franchised or managed hotel for the use of one
of our trade names, while marketing and reservation revenues are
fees that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
(e)
|
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services.
|
(f)
|
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the
period divided by the average number of vacation exchange
members during the period.
|
(g)
|
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
(h)
|
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions. Excluding the impact of
foreign exchange movements, such increase was 6%.
|
(i)
|
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
(j)
|
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(k)
|
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding
tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by
the number of tours.
|
44
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2007
Our consolidated results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
Expenses
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
(1,540
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(1,542
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
(1,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, our net revenues decreased $79 million (2%)
principally due to (i) a $150 million increase in our
provision for loan losses at our vacation ownership business;
(ii) a net increase of $48 million in deferred revenue
under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting at our
vacation ownership business; (iii) a $34 million
decrease in ancillary revenues at our vacation ownership
business associated with bonus points/credits that are provided
as purchase incentives on VOI sales; (iv) an
$8 million decrease in annual dues and exchange revenues
due to a decline in revenue generated per member, partially
offset by growth in the average number of members and (v) a
$6 million decrease in gross sales of VOIs at our vacation
ownership businesses due to our strategic realignment
initiatives. Such decreases were partially offset by (i) a
$68 million increase in consumer financing revenues earned
on vacation ownership contract receivables due primarily to
growth in the portfolio; (ii) a $42 million increase
in net revenues from rental transactions primarily due to an
increase in the average net price per rental, including the
favorable impact of foreign exchange movements, and the
conversion of two of our Landal parks from franchised to
managed; (iii) $36 million of incremental property
management fees within our vacation ownership business primarily
as a result of growth in the number of units under management;
and (iv) a $28 million increase in net revenues in our
lodging business due to higher international royalty, marketing
and reservation revenues, incremental net revenues generated
from the July 2008 acquisition of U.S. Franchise Systems,
Inc. and its Microtel Inns & Suites and Hawthorn
Suites hotel brands (USFS), increased revenue from
our Wyndham Rewards loyalty program and incremental property
management reimbursable revenues, partially offset by lower
domestic royalty, marketing and reservation revenues. The total
net revenue increase at our vacation exchange and rentals
business includes the favorable impact of foreign currency
translation of $16 million.
Total expenses increased $1,461 million principally
reflecting (i) a non-cash charge of $1,342 million for
the impairment of goodwill at our vacation ownership business as
a result of organizational realignment plans (see Restructuring
Plan for more details) announced during the fourth quarter of
2008 which reduced future cash flow estimates by lowering our
expected VOI sales pace in the future based on the expectation
that access to the asset-backed securities market will continue
to be challenging; (ii) non-cash charges of
$84 million across our three businesses to reduce the
carrying value of certain assets based on their revised
estimated fair values; (iii) the recognition of
$79 million of costs at our lodging, vacation exchange and
rentals and vacation ownership businesses relating to
organizational realignment initiatives;
(iv) $28 million of a lower net benefit related to the
resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent liabilities
and assets; (v) a $28 million increase in operating
and administrative expenses at our vacation exchange and rentals
business primarily related to increased resort services expenses
resulting from the conversion of two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, increased volume-related expenses due to
growth, higher employee incentive program expenses and increased
consulting costs; (vi) charges of $24 million due to
currency conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from
our Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business; (vii) a $20 million increase in operating
and administrative expenses at our lodging business primarily
related to increased payroll costs paid on behalf of and for
which we are reimbursed by the property owners, increased
expenses related to ancillary services provided to franchisees
and increased expenses resulting from the USFS acquisition,
partially offset by savings from cost containment initiatives
and lower employee incentive program expenses;
(viii) $21 million of increased consumer financing
interest expense; (ix) an $18 million increase in
depreciation and amortization primarily reflecting increased
capital investments over the past two years; (x) the
unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
at our vacation exchange and rentals business of
$18 million; and (xi) an $8 million increase in
operating and administrative expenses at our vacation ownership
business primarily related to increased costs related to
property management services, partially offset by lower employee
related expenses. These increases were partially offset by
(i) $85 million of decreased cost of sales at our
vacation ownership business primarily due to increased estimated
recoveries associated with the increase in our provision for
loan losses, as discussed above; (ii) $49 million of
decreased costs at our vacation ownership business
45
primarily related to sales incentives awarded to owners, lower
maintenance fees on unsold inventory, the absence of costs
associated with the repair of one of our completed VOI resorts
and the absence of a net charge related to a prior acquisition;
(iii) $23 million of increased deferred expenses
related to the net increase in deferred revenue at our vacation
ownership business, as discussed above;
(iv) $16 million of favorable hedging on foreign
exchange contracts at our vacation exchange and rentals
business; (v) $16 million of decreased separation and
related costs; (vi) $16 million in cost savings from
overhead reductions at our vacation exchange and rentals
business; (vii) the absence of $7 million of severance
related expenses recorded at our vacation exchange and rentals
business during 2007; and (viii) $6 million of lower
corporate costs primarily related to cost containment
initiatives implemented during 2008 and lower legal and
professional fees.
Other income, net increased $4 million due to
(i) higher net earnings primarily from equity investments,
(ii) income associated with the assumption of a
lodging-related credit card marketing program obligation by a
third-party and (iii) income associated with the sale of
certain assets. Such increases were partially offset by the
absence of a pre-tax gain recorded during 2007 on the sale of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets.
Interest expense increased $7 million during 2008 compared
with 2007 as a result of (i) lower capitalized interest at
our vacation ownership business due to lower development of
vacation ownership inventory and (ii) higher interest paid
on our long-term debt facilities due to an increase in our
revolving credit facility balance. Interest income increased
$1 million during 2008 compared with 2007.
The difference between our 2008 effective tax rate of (21.1%)
and 2007 effective tax rate of 38.5% is primarily due to
(i) the non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge
recorded during 2008, (ii) charges in a tax-free zone
resulting from currency conversion losses related to the
transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations at our vacation
exchange and rentals business and (iii) a non-cash
impairment charge related to the write-off of an investment in a
non-performing joint venture at our vacation exchange and
rentals business. See Note 7Income Taxes for a
detailed reconciliation of our effective tax rate.
As a result of these items, our net income decreased
$1,477 million as compared to 2007.
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
segments, interest expense/income and other income net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Corporate and
Other
(a)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not meaningful.
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues increased $28 million (4%) and EBITDA
decreased $5 million (2%), respectively, during 2008
compared to 2007 primarily reflecting higher international
royalty, marketing and reservation revenues, incremental net
revenues generated from the July 2008 acquisition of USFS,
increased revenue from our Wyndham Rewards loyalty program and
incremental property management reimbursable revenues, partially
offset by lower domestic royalty, marketing and reservation
revenues. Such net revenue increase was more than offset in
EBITDA by increased expenses, particularly associated with a
strategic change in direction related to our Howard Johnson
brand, ancillary services provided to franchisees, incremental
property management reimbursable revenues, the acquisition of
USFS and organizational realignment initiatives, partially
offset by savings from cost containment initiatives.
The acquisition of USFS contributed incremental net revenues and
EBITDA of $12 million and $3 million, respectively.
Apart from this acquisition, the increase in net revenues
includes (i) $17 million of incremental international
royalty, marketing and reservation revenues resulting from
international RevPAR growth of 2%, or 1%
46
excluding the impact of foreign exchange movements, and a 13%
increase in international rooms, (ii) $10 million of
incremental revenue generated by our Wyndham Rewards loyalty
program primarily due to increased member stays,
(iii) $8 million of incremental reimbursable revenues
earned by our property management business and (iv) a
$16 million increase in other revenue primarily due to fees
generated upon execution of franchise contracts and ancillary
services that we provide to our franchisees. Such increases were
partially offset by a decrease of $35 million in domestic
royalty, marketing and reservation revenues due to a domestic
RevPAR decline of 5% and incremental development advance note
amortization, which is recorded net within revenues. The
domestic RevPAR decline was principally driven by an overall
decline in industry occupancy levels, while the international
RevPAR growth was principally driven by price increases,
partially offset by a decline in occupancy levels. The
$8 million of incremental reimbursable revenues earned by
our property management business primarily relates to payroll
costs that we incur and pay on behalf of property owners, for
which we are fully reimbursed by the property owner. As the
reimbursements are made based upon cost with no added margin,
the recorded revenue is offset by the associated expense and
there is no resultant impact on EBITDA.
EBITDA further reflects (i) a $16 million non-cash
impairment charge primarily due to a strategic change in
direction related to our Howard Johnson brand that is expected
to adversely impact the ability of the properties associated
with the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards, (ii) $15 million of increased costs
primarily associated with ancillary services provided to
franchisees, as discussed above, and (iii) $4 million
of costs relating to organizational realignment initiatives (see
Restructuring Plan for more details). Such cost increases were
partially offset by (i) $10 million of savings from
cost containment initiatives, (ii) $2 million of
income associated with the assumption of a lodging-related
credit card marketing program obligation by a third-party,
(iii) $2 million of income associated with the sale of
a non-strategic asset, (iv) $2 million of lower
employee incentive program expenses compared to 2007 and
(v) a net decrease of $1 million in marketing expenses
primarily relating to lower marketing spend across our brands,
partially offset by incremental expenditures in our Wyndham
Rewards loyalty program.
As of December 31, 2008, we had 7,043 properties and
approximately 592,900 rooms in our system. Additionally, our
hotel development pipeline included approximately 990 hotels and
approximately 110,900 rooms, of which 42% were international and
55% were new construction as of December 31, 2008.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues increased $41 million (3%) and EBITDA
decreased $45 million (15%) during 2008 compared with 2007.
The increase in net revenues primarily reflects a
$42 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions and related services and a $7 million increase
in ancillary revenues, which includes $5 million of
favorability related to an adjustment recorded during the second
quarter of 2007 that reduced Asia Pacific consulting revenues,
partially offset by an $8 million decrease in annual dues
and exchange revenues. EBITDA reflects $36 million of
non-cash charges to reduce the carrying value of certain assets
based on their revised estimated fair values, $24 million
of charges due to currency conversion losses related to the
transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations and
$9 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives, partially offset by $16 million in cost
savings from overhead reductions, $16 million of favorable
hedging on foreign exchange contracts and the absence of
$7 million of severance-related expenses recorded during
2007. Net revenue and expense increases include $16 million
and $18 million, respectively, of currency translation
impact from a weaker U.S. dollar compared to other foreign
currencies.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $42 million (7%) during 2008 compared
with 2007. Excluding the favorable impact of foreign exchange
movements, net revenues generated from rental transactions and
related services increased $21 million (4%) during 2008
driven by (i) the conversion of two of our Landal parks
from franchised to managed, which contributed an incremental
$20 million to revenues, and (ii) a 2% increase in the
average net price per rental primarily resulting from increased
pricing at our Landal and Novasol European vacation rentals
businesses. These increases were partially offset by a 2%
decline in rental transaction volume primarily driven by lower
rental volume at our other European cottage businesses as well
as lower member rentals, which we believe was a result of
customers altering their vacation decisions primarily due to the
downturn in North America and other worldwide economies. The
decline in rental transaction volume was partially offset by
increased rentals at our Landal business, which benefited from
enhanced marketing programs.
Annual dues and exchange revenues decreased $8 million (2%)
during 2008 compared with 2007. Excluding the unfavorable impact
of foreign exchange movements, annual dues and exchange revenues
declined $5 million (1%) driven by a 5% decline in revenue
generated per member, partially offset by a 4% increase in the
average number of members. The decrease in revenue per member
was driven by lower exchange transactions per member, partially
offset by the impact of favorable exchange transaction pricing
driven by transaction mix. We believe that lower transactions
reflect: (i) recent heightened economic uncertainty and
(ii) recent trends among timeshare vacation ownership
developers to enroll members in private label clubs, whereby the
members have the option to
47
exchange within the club or through RCI channels. Such trends
have a positive impact on the average number of members but an
offsetting effect on the number of exchange transactions per
average member. An increase in ancillary revenues of
$7 million was driven by (i) the $5 million Asia
Pacific adjustment, as discussed above, and
(ii) $4 million from various sources, which include
fees from additional services provided to transacting members,
club servicing revenues, fees from our credit card loyalty
program and fees generated from programs with affiliated
resorts, partially offset by $2 million due to the
unfavorable translation effects of foreign exchange movements.
EBITDA further reflects an increase in expenses of
$86 million (9%) primarily driven by (i) charges of
$24 million due to currency conversion losses related to
the transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations,
(ii) non-cash impairment charges of $21 million due to
trademark and fixed asset write downs resulting from a strategic
change in direction and reduced future investments in a vacation
rentals business, (iii) $18 million of increased
resort services expenses as a result of the conversion of two of
our Landal parks from franchised to managed, as discussed above,
(iv) the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation
on expenses of $18 million, (v) a non-cash impairment
charge of $15 million due to the write-off of our
investment in a non-performing joint venture,
(vi) $9 million of costs relating to organizational
realignment initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more
details), (vii) a $4 million increase in
volume-related expenses, which was substantially comprised of
incremental costs to support growth in rental transaction volume
at our Landal business, as discussed above, higher rental
inventory fulfillment costs and increased staffing costs to
support member growth, (viii) $4 million of higher
employee incentive program expenses compared to 2007 and
(ix) $2 million of consulting costs on researching the
improvement of web-based search and booking functionalities.
Such increases were partially offset by
(i) $16 million of favorable hedging on foreign
exchange contracts, (ii) $16 million in cost savings
from overhead reductions, (iii) the absence of
$7 million of severance-related expenses recorded during
2007 and (iv) $3 million of lower marketing expenses
primarily due to timing.
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA decreased $147 million (6%) and
$1,452 million, respectively, during 2008 compared with
2007.
During October 2008, we announced plans to refocus our vacation
ownership sales and marketing efforts on consumers with higher
credit quality beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a
result, operating results reflect costs related to realignment
initiatives and decreased gross VOI sales. Results also
reflect a higher provision for loan losses, partially offset by
growth in consumer finance income, as well as lower cost of
sales and decreased employee-related expenses.
During December 2008, we announced an acceleration of our
initiatives to increase cash flow and reduce our need to access
the asset-backed securities market by reducing the sales pace of
our vacation ownership business. We expect gross sales of VOIs
during 2009 of approximately $1.2 billion (a decrease of
approximately 40% from 2008). In addition, management performed
its annual goodwill impairment test in accordance with
SFAS 142 during the fourth quarter of 2008. We used a
discounted cash flow model and incorporated assumptions that we
believe marketplace participants would utilize. Management
concluded that an adjustment was appropriate and, as such,
during 2008, we recorded a non-cash $1,342 million charge
for the impairment of goodwill at our vacation ownership
business to reflect reduced future cash flow estimates based on
the expectation that access to the asset-backed securities
market will continue to be challenging.
Gross sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership business decreased
$6 million during 2008 compared to 2007, as tour flow and
VPG remained relatively unchanged. An increase in upgrades was
more than offset by a decrease in sales to new customers. The
positive impact to tour flow from the continued growth of our
in-house sales programs, albeit slower than during 2007 due to
the impact of negative economic conditions faced during 2008,
was offset by the closure of over 50 sales offices. The positive
impact to VPG from a favorable tour mix and higher pricing was
offset by a decrease in sales to new customers. We believe that
the positive impact to upgrades resulted from increased pricing,
a larger owner base, new resorts and more units. Net revenues
were favorably impacted by $36 million of incremental
property management fees primarily as a result of growth in the
number of units under management. Such revenue increase was more
than offset by (i) an increase of $150 million in our
provision for loan losses during 2008 as compared to 2007
primarily due to a higher estimate of uncollectible receivables
as a percentage of VOI sales financed and (ii) a
$34 million decrease in ancillary revenues associated with
bonus points/credits that are provided as purchase incentives on
VOI sales. The trend of higher uncollectible receivables as a
percentage of VOI sales financed has continued since the fourth
quarter of 2007 as the strains of the overall economy appear to
be negatively impacting the borrowers in our portfolio,
particularly those with lower credit scores. While the continued
impact of the economy is uncertain, we have taken measures that,
over time, should leave us with a smaller portfolio that has a
stronger credit profile. See Critical Accounting Policies for
more information regarding our allowance for loan losses.
48
Under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, a
portion of the total revenue associated with the sale of a
vacation ownership interest is deferred if the construction of
the vacation resort has not yet been fully completed. Such
revenue will be recognized in future periods as construction of
the vacation resort progresses. Our sales mix during 2008
included higher sales generated from vacation resorts where
construction was still in progress, resulting in net deferred
revenue under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting
of $75 million during 2008 compared to $22 million
during 2007. Accordingly, net revenues and EBITDA comparisons
were negatively impacted by $48 million (after deducting
the related provision for loan losses) and $25 million,
respectively, as a result of the net increase in deferred
revenue under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting.
We anticipate a net benefit of approximately $150-
200 million from the recognition of previously deferred
revenue as construction of these resorts progresses, partially
offset by continued sales generated from vacation resorts where
construction is still in progress.
Net revenues and EBITDA comparisons were favorably impacted by
$68 million and $47 million, respectively, during 2008
due to net interest income of $295 million earned on
contract receivables during 2008 as compared to
$248 million during 2007. Such increase was primarily due
to growth in the portfolio, partially offset in EBITDA by higher
interest expenses during 2008. We incurred interest expense of
$131 million on our securitized debt at a weighted average
rate of 5.2% during 2008 compared to $110 million at a
weighted average rate of 5.4% during 2007. Our net interest
income margin during 2008 was 69%, unchanged as compared to
2007, due to increased securitizations completed after
December 31, 2007, offset by a 20 basis point decrease
in interest rates, as described above, and a decline in advance
rates (i.e., the percentage of receivables securitized).
EBITDA was also positively impacted by $43 million (2%) of
decreased expenses, exclusive of incremental interest expense on
our securitized debt, primarily resulting from
(i) $85 million of decreased cost of sales primarily
due to increased estimated recoveries associated with the
increase in our provision for loan losses, as discussed above,
(ii) $36 million of decreased costs related to sales
incentives awarded to owners, (iii) $25 million of
lower employee-related expenses, (iv) $9 million of
reduced costs associated with maintenance fees on unsold
inventory, (v) the absence of $9 million of separation
and related costs recorded during 2007, (vi) the absence of
$2 million of costs recorded during the first quarter of
2007 associated with the repair of one of our completed VOI
resorts and (vii) the absence of a $2 million net
charge recorded during 2007 related to a prior acquisition. Such
decreases were partially offset by (i) $66 million of
costs relating to organizational realignment initiatives (see
Restructuring Plan for more details), (ii) $33 million
of increased costs related to the property management services,
as discussed above, (iii) a $28 million non-cash
impairment charge due to our initiative to rebrand two of our
vacation ownership trademarks to the Wyndham brand and
(iv) a $4 million non-cash impairment charge related
to the termination of a development project. In addition, EBITDA
was negatively impacted by the absence of an $8 million
pre-tax gain on the sale of certain vacation ownership
properties during 2007 that were no longer consistent with our
development plans. Such gain was recorded within other income,
net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
1,400 units in 6 U.S. states, Washington D.C. and four
foreign countries, a decline from 4,000 units at
December 31, 2007 primarily due to the completion of some
of the 2007 pipeline units in addition to our initiative to
reduce our VOI sales pace. We expect the pipeline to support
both new purchases of vacation ownership and upgrade sales to
existing owners.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses increased $15 million during
2008 compared with 2007. Such increase includes $28 million
of a lower net benefit related to the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets,
partially offset by (i) the absence of $7 million of
separation and related costs recorded during 2007 primarily
relating to consulting and legal services and (ii) a
$6 million decrease in corporate costs primarily related to
cost containment initiatives implemented during 2008 and lower
legal and professional fees.
Other
Income, Net
During 2008, other income, net increased $4 million due to
(i) $7 million of higher net earnings primarily from
equity investments, (ii) $2 million of income
associated with the assumption of a lodging-related credit card
marketing program obligation by a third-party,
(iii) $2 million of income associated with the sale of
a non-strategic asset at our lodging business and (iv) a
$1 million gain on the sale of assets. Such increases were
partially offset by the absence of an $8 million pre-tax
gain on the sale of certain vacation ownership properties and
related assets during 2007. Such amounts are included within our
segment EBITDA results.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income
Interest expense increased $7 million during 2008 compared
with 2007 as a result of (i) a $4 million decrease in
capitalized interest at our vacation ownership business due to
lower development of vacation ownership inventory
49
and (ii) a $3 million increase in interest incurred on
our long-term debt facilities. Interest income increased
$1 million during 2008 compared with 2007.
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms
(a)
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
RevPAR
(b)
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation revenue (in
000s)
(c)
|
|
$
|
489,041
|
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s)
(d)
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member
(e)
|
|
$
|
135.85
|
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s)
(f)
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental
(g)
|
|
$
|
422.83
|
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales (in
000s)
(h)
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Tours
(i)
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG)
(j)
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the year which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and
other services provided and (iii) properties managed under
the CHI Limited joint venture. The amounts in 2007 and 2006
include 6,856 and 4,993 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
(b)
|
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(c)
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenues are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
(d)
|
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain members may exchange
intervals for other leisure-related products and services.
|
(e)
|
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the year
divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year.
|
(f)
|
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
(g)
|
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions. On a comparable basis
(excluding the impact of foreign exchange movements), such
increase was 6%.
|
(h)
|
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
(i)
|
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(j)
|
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding
tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by
the number of tours.
|
50
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2006
Our consolidated and combined results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, our net revenues increased $518 million (13%)
principally due to (i) a $205 million increase in net
sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership businesses due to higher
tour flow and an increase in VPG; (ii) an $83 million
increase in net revenues from rental transactions primarily due
to growth in rental transaction volume, an increase in the
average net price per rental and the conversion of two of our
Landal parks from franchised to managed; (iii) a
$67 million increase in net consumer financing revenues
earned on vacation ownership contract receivables due primarily
to growth in the portfolio; (iv) a $64 million
increase in net revenues in our lodging business, primarily due
to RevPAR growth, incremental reimbursable revenues and
incremental net revenues generated by our Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program; (v) $57 million of incremental
property management fees within our vacation ownership business
primarily as a result of growth in the number of units under
management; (vi) a $24 million increase in annual dues
and exchange revenues due to growth in the average number of
members and favorable transaction pricing, partially offset by a
decline in exchange transactions per member and
(vii) $13 million of incremental ancillary revenues
from our vacation ownership and vacation exchange and rentals
businesses. The net revenue increase at our vacation exchange
and rentals business includes the favorable impact of foreign
currency translation of $49 million.
Total expenses increased $385 million (12%) principally
reflecting (i) a $336 million increase in operating
and administrative expenses primarily related to incremental
corporate costs incurred as a stand-alone public company,
additional commission expense resulting from increased VOI
sales, increased volume-related expenses and staffing costs due
to growth in our vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses, increased costs related to the property
management services that we provide at our vacation ownership
business, increased interest expense on our securitized debt,
which is included in operating expenses, increased payroll costs
paid on behalf of property owners in our lodging business, for
which we are reimbursed by the property owners, increased costs
related to sales incentives awarded to owners at our vacation
ownership business, increased resort services expenses at our
vacation exchange and rentals business as a result of converting
two of our Landal parks from franchised to managed and increased
expenses at our lodging business primarily related to higher
information technology costs, expanding our international
operations and providing ancillary services to our franchisees;
(ii) an $87 million increase in marketing and
reservation expenses primarily resulting from increased
marketing initiatives across our lodging and vacation ownership
businesses; (iii) $59 million of increased cost of
sales primarily associated with increased VOI sales; and
(iv) the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation
on expenses at our vacation exchange and rentals business of
$39 million. These increases were partially offset by
(i) $83 million of decreased costs related to our
separation from Cendant; (ii) $46 million of a net
benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets; and (iii) the absence of
a $21 million charge recorded at our vacation exchange and
rentals business during the second quarter of 2006 related to
local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions.
The increase in depreciation and amortization of
$18 million primarily resulted from technology and fixed
asset investments placed into service during 2007. Other income,
net primarily reflects an $8 million pre-tax gain on the
sale of certain vacation ownership properties and related assets
during 2007 that were no longer consistent with our development
plans. Interest expense increased $6 million and interest
income decreased $21 million during 2007 primarily due to
our current capital structure as a result of our separation from
Cendant. Our effective tax rate increased to 38.5% in 2007 from
35.1% in 2006 primarily due to an increase in nondeductible
items and the absence of a state tax benefit recognized in 2006.
We recorded an after tax charge of $65 million during the
first quarter of 2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting
change related to the adoption of SFAS No. 152. Such
charge consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of
51
$105 million representing the deferral of revenue, costs
associated with sales of VOIs that were recognized prior to
January 1, 2006 and the recognition of certain expenses
that were previously deferred and (ii) an associated tax
benefit of $40 million.
As a result of these items, our net income increased
$116 million (40%) during 2007 as compared to 2006.
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
segments, interest expense/income and other income net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Corporate and
Other
(a)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $64 million (10%) and
$15 million (7%), respectively, during 2007 compared with
2006 primarily reflecting strong RevPAR gains across the
majority of our brands, the success of our Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program and incremental property management reimbursable
revenues. Such increases were partially offset in EBITDA by
increased expenses, particularly for marketing activities.
The increase in net revenues includes (i) $23 million
of incremental reimbursable revenues earned by our property
management business, (ii) an $18 million (4%) increase
in royalty, marketing and reservation revenues, which was
primarily due to RevPAR growth of 4%,
(iii) $12 million of incremental revenue generated by
our Wyndham Rewards loyalty program primarily due to increased
member stays and (iv) an $11 million increase in other
revenue primarily due to fees generated upon execution of
franchise contracts and ancillary services that we provide to
our franchisees. The $23 million of incremental
reimbursable revenues earned by our property management business
primarily relates to payroll costs that we incur and pay on
behalf of property owners, for which we are reimbursed by the
property owner. As the reimbursements are made based upon cost
with no added margin, the recorded revenue is offset by the
associated expense and there is no resultant impact on EBITDA.
The $18 million increase in royalty, marketing and
reservation revenues was substantially driven by price
increases, as well as occupancy increases, reflecting the
beneficial impact of management and marketing initiatives and an
increased focus on quality enhancements, including strengthening
our brand standards, as well as an overall improvement in the
economy and midscale lodging segments, which are the segments
where we primarily compete.
EBITDA further reflects (i) $15 million of higher
expenses primarily resulting from incremental revenues received
from our franchisees, as discussed above,
(ii) $5 million of increased information technology
costs related to developing a more robust infrastructure to
support current and future global growth and (iii) an
increase of $6 million in other expenses primarily related
to expanding our international operations and providing
ancillary services to our franchisees. The $15 million of
increased marketing spend is reflective of (i) incremental
expenditures in our Wyndham Rewards loyalty program,
(ii) higher fees received from our franchisees (where we
are contractually obligated to expend these fees for marketing
purposes) and (iii) additional campaigns in international
regions that we have targeted for growth.
As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately 6,540
properties and approximately 550,600 rooms in our system.
Additionally, our hotel development pipeline included
approximately 930 hotels and approximately 105,000 rooms, of
which approximately 32% were international and approximately 44%
were new construction as of December 31, 2007.
52
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $99 million (9%) and
$28 million (11%), respectively, during 2007 compared with
2006. The increase in net revenues primarily reflects an
$83 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions, a $24 million increase in annual dues and
exchange revenues, partially offset by an $8 million
decrease in ancillary revenues. The increase in EBITDA also
includes an increase in expenses, partially offset by the
absence of a $21 million charge recorded in second quarter
2006 related to local taxes payable to certain foreign
jurisdictions. Net revenue and expense increases include
$49 million and $39 million, respectively, of currency
translation from a weaker U.S. dollar compared to other
foreign currencies.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $83 million (17%) during 2007 driven by
(i) a 2% increase in rental transaction volume, (ii) a
10% increase in the average net price per rental (or 3%,
excluding the favorable impact of foreign exchange movements)
and (iii) the conversion of two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, which contributed an incremental
$16 million to revenues or 4% to average net price per
rental. Excluding the favorable impact of foreign exchange
movements and the conversion of two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, the 3% increase in average net price per
rental was primarily a result of mix shift of rental activity to
higher premium destinations. The growth in rental transaction
volume was driven by increased rentals at our Landal and Novasol
European vacation rental businesses, which primarily resulted
from (i) enhanced marketing programs initiated to support
an expansion strategy to provide consumers with broader
inventories and more destinations and (ii) improved local
economies. The growth in rental transactions was also the result
of increased rentals in Latin America due to increased marketing
efforts and broader distribution channels. Such growth was
partially offset by a decline in RCI member rentals in Europe,
decreased cottage rentals in the domestic United Kingdom cottage
market primarily due to severe weather conditions during 2007
and a decline in cottage and apartment rentals at French
destinations. The increase in net revenues from rental
transactions includes the translation effects of foreign
exchange movements, which favorably impacted net rental revenues
by $38 million.
Annual dues and exchange revenues increased $24 million
(5%) during 2007 as compared with 2006 primarily due to a 5%
increase in the average number of members. Annual dues and
exchange revenue per member was relatively flat during 2007 as
compared to 2006 as a result of favorable transaction pricing,
which was offset by a decline in exchange transactions per
average member. The timing of intervals and points deposits and
the mix of intervals and points to be utilized during 2007
compared with 2006 contributed to the decline in exchange
transactions per average member. In addition, we believe that
trends among timeshare vacation ownership developers are
(i) to sell multiyear products, whereby the members have
access to the product every second or third year and
(ii) to enroll members in private label clubs, whereby the
members have the option to exchange within the club or through
other RCI channels. Such trends have a positive impact on the
average number of members but an offsetting effect on the number
of exchange transactions per average member. Ancillary revenues
decreased due to the absence of $6 million of consulting
revenues in our Asia Pacific region recorded during 2006 but not
repeated during 2007 and a $5 million adjustment recorded
during the second quarter of 2007 relating to previously
recorded consulting revenues in our Asia Pacific region. Such
decreases were partially offset by $3 million of increased
revenues during 2007 from various sources, which include fees
from additional services provided to transacting members, club
servicing revenues, fees from our credit card loyalty program
and fees generated from programs with affiliates. The increase
in annual dues and exchange revenues and ancillary revenues
includes the translation effects of foreign exchange movements,
which favorably impacted revenues by $11 million.
EBITDA further reflects an increase in expenses of
$71 million (8%) primarily driven by (i) the
unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $39 million, (ii) a $37 million increase in
volume-related expenses, which was substantially comprised of
incremental costs to support growth in rental transaction
volume, as discussed above, increased staffing costs to support
member growth and increased call volumes as well as incremental
investments in our information technology infrastructure,
(iii) $15 million of increased resort services
expenses as a result of converting two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, as discussed above,
(iv) $5 million of incremental employee incentive
program expenses during 2007 and (v) $4 million of
incremental severance related expenses recorded during 2007.
These increases were partially offset by (i) the absence of
a $21 million charge recorded during the second quarter of
2006 related to local taxes payable to certain foreign
jurisdictions, (ii) the absence of $3 million of costs
related to our separation from Cendant recorded during 2006 and
(iii) the absence of $2 million of costs incurred
during 2006 to close offices and consolidate certain call center
operations.
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $357 million (17%) and
$53 million (16%), respectively, during 2007 compared with
2006. The operating results reflect growth in vacation ownership
sales, consumer finance income and property management fees, as
well as the impact of operational changes made during 2006 that
resulted in the recognition of revenues that would have
otherwise been deferred until a later date under the provisions
of
53
SFAS No. 152. The impact of these operational changes
in 2006 resulted in higher net revenues and EBITDA of
$67 million and $34 million, respectively, that were
not replicated during 2007. Such growth was partially offset by
incremental expenses during 2007 as compared to 2006.
Gross sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership business increased
$250 million (14%) during 2007, driven principally by a 9%
increase in tour flow and an 8% increase in VPG. Tour flow was
positively impacted by the continued development of our in-house
sales programs and the opening of new sales locations. VPG
benefited from a favorable tour mix, improved efficiency in our
upgrade program and higher pricing. Net revenues were impacted
during 2007 by (i) $57 million of incremental property
management fees primarily as a result of growth in the number of
units under management and (ii) $21 million of
increased ancillary revenues resulting from higher VOI sales.
Such revenue increases were partially offset by an increase of
$46 million in our provision for loan losses primarily due
to higher financed VOI sales during 2007 as compared to 2006.
During both 2007 and 2006, gross sales of VOIs were reduced by
$22 million of revenue that is deferred under the
percentage of completion method of accounting. Under the
percentage of completion method of accounting, a portion of the
total revenue from a vacation ownership contract sale is not
recognized if the construction of the vacation resort has not
yet been fully completed. Such revenue will be recognized in
future periods in proportion to the costs incurred as compared
to the total expected costs for completion of construction of
the vacation resort. Due to the strong sales pace and the timing
of product construction, we anticipate an increase in deferred
revenue of approximately $40 $100 million
during 2008. This deferred revenue is expected to be realized
during future periods and there is no impact to our Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows.
In addition, net revenues and EBITDA increased $67 million
and $27 million, respectively, during 2007 due to net
interest income of $248 million earned on contract
receivables during 2007 as compared to $221 million during
2006. Such increase was primarily due to growth in the
portfolio, partially offset in EBITDA by higher interest costs
during 2007. We incurred interest expense of $110 million
on our securitized debt at a weighted average rate of 5.4%
during 2007 compared to $70 million at a weighted average
rate of 5.1% during 2006. Our net interest income margin
decreased from 76% during 2006 to 69% during 2007 due to
increased securitizations completed in 2007, a 36 basis
point increase in interest rates, as described above, and
approximately $32 million of increased average borrowings
on our other securitized debt facilities during 2007 as compared
to 2006. Our securitized debt increased by $618 million
from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007, while our
vacation ownership contract receivables increased by
$564 million during the same periods. We were able to
securitize a higher percentage of our vacation ownership
contract receivables during 2007 as compared with 2006. Such
improved borrowing efficiency against vacation ownership
receivables shifted $13 million of what would have been
interest expense below EBITDA into interest expense reflected
within EBITDA, which decreased our net interest income margin.
See Liquidity Risk for a description of the anticipated impact
on our securitizations from the adverse conditions suffered by
the United States asset-backed securities and commercial paper
markets.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of approximately
$306 million (18%) in operating, marketing and
administrative expenses, exclusive of incremental interest
expense on our securitized debt and the impact of the
operational changes made in 2006 in conjunction with the
adoption of SFAS No. 152, primarily resulting from
(i) $78 million of increased cost of sales primarily
associated with increased VOI sales, (ii) $72 million
of incremental marketing expenses to support sales efforts,
(iii) $48 million of additional commission expense
associated with increased VOI sales, (iv) $44 million
of increased costs related to the property management services,
as discussed above, (v) $35 million of incremental
costs primarily incurred to fund additional staffing needs to
support continued growth in the business and
(vi) $19 million of costs related to sales incentives
awarded to owners. Such increases were partially offset by a
$9 million decrease in costs related to our separation from
Cendant, primarily related to the absence of an impairment
charge recorded during the fourth quarter of 2006 due to a
rebranding initiative for our Fairfield and Trendwest
trademarks. In addition, we recorded two items during the second
quarter of 2007 related to a prior acquisition: an additional
litigation settlement reserve of $7 million, partially
offset by the reversal of a $5 million reserve due to the
resolution of a vendor-related tax liability resulting from such
acquisition. EBITDA also benefited from an $8 million
pre-tax gain on the sale of certain vacation ownership
properties and related assets during 2007 that were no longer
consistent with our development plans. Such gain was recorded
within other income, net on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
4,000 units in 12 U.S. states, Washington D.C., Puerto
Rico and four foreign countries. We expect the pipeline to
support both new purchases of vacation ownership and upgrade
sales to existing owners.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses decreased $64 million in 2007
compared with 2006. Such decrease primarily includes (i) a
$69 million decrease in separation and related costs due to
the acceleration of vesting of Cendant equity awards and related
equitable adjustments of such awards during the third quarter of
2006 and (ii) $46 million
54
of a net benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to
certain liabilities and assets. Such amounts were partially
offset by $55 million of incremental stand-alone, corporate
costs, including personnel-related and public company costs,
incurred during 2007.
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net includes the $8 million pre-tax gain on
the sale of certain vacation ownership properties and related
assets, as discussed above, partially offset by $1 million
primarily related to net losses from equity investments. All
such amounts are included within our segment EBITDA results.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income
Interest expense increased $6 million during 2007 compared
with the same period during 2006 primarily as a result of
$42 million of incremental interest on the new borrowing
arrangements that we entered into during July 2006 and December
2006, partially offset by (i) a decline of $18 million
of interest on our vacation ownership asset-linked debt due to
its elimination by our former Parent in July 2006, (ii) the
absence of $11 million of interest on local taxes payable
to certain foreign jurisdictions recorded during the second
quarter of 2006 and (iii) a $7 million increase in
capitalized interest at our vacation ownership business due to
the increased development of vacation ownership inventory.
Interest income decreased $21 million during 2007 compared
with 2006 primarily as a result of a $24 million decrease
in net interest income earned on advances between us and our
former Parent, since those advances were eliminated upon our
separation from Cendant, partially offset by a $5 million
increase in interest income earned on invested cash balances as
a result of an increase in cash available for investment.
RESTRUCTURING
PLAN
In response to a deteriorating global economy, during 2008, we
committed to various strategic realignment initiatives targeted
principally at reducing costs, enhancing organizational
efficiency and consolidating and rationalizing existing
processes and facilities. As a result, we recorded
$79 million in restructuring costs during 2008. Such
strategic realignment initiatives included:
Lodging
We realigned the operations of our lodging business to enhance
its global franchisee services, promote more efficient channel
management to further drive revenue at franchised locations and
managed properties and position the Wyndham brand appropriately
and consistently in the marketplace. As a result of these
changes, certain positions were eliminated and severance
benefits and outplacement services were provided for impacted
employees resulting in costs of $4 million. We expect
additional costs of approximately $1 million to
$3 million during the first quarter of 2009.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Our strategic realignment in our vacation exchange and rentals
business streamlined exchange operations primarily across its
international businesses by reducing management layers to
improve regional accountability. Such plan resulted in
$9 million in restructuring costs during 2008. We expect
additional costs of approximately $2 million to
$8 million during the first quarter of 2009.
Vacation
Ownership
Our vacation ownership business refocused its sales and
marketing efforts by closing the least profitable sales offices
and eliminating marketing programs that were producing prospects
with lower credit quality. Consequently, we have decreased the
level of timeshare development, reduced our need to access the
asset-backed securities market and enhanced the cash flow from
the business unit. Such realignment includes the elimination of
certain positions, the termination of leases of certain sales
offices, the termination of development projects and the
write-off of assets related to the sales offices. These
initiatives resulted in costs of $66 million during 2008.
We expect additional costs of approximately $27 million to
$34 million during the first quarter of 2009.
Total
Company
These strategic realignments, including the termination of
approximately 4,500 employees, resulted in total
restructuring costs of $79 million during 2008, of which
$16 million was paid in cash and $23 million was a
non-cash expense. The remaining balance of $40 million will
be paid in cash; $27 million of personnel-related by May
2010 and $13 million of primarily facility-related by
November 2013. We anticipate additional restructuring costs
during the first quarter of 2009 of (i) approximately $20
to $30 million in cash payments for severance and related
benefits and facility-related costs and (ii) approximately
$10 to $15 million in non-cash charges primarily related to
55
lease terminations over the next nine years. These amounts are
preliminary estimates and subject to change. We began to realize
the benefits of these restructuring initiatives during the
fourth quarter of 2008 and anticipate annual net savings from
such initiatives of approximately $160 million to
$180 million beginning in 2009.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,573
|
|
|
$
|
10,459
|
|
|
$
|
(886
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,231
|
|
|
|
6,943
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
Total assets decreased $886 million from December 31,
2007 to December 31, 2008 primarily due to (i) a
$1,370 million decrease in goodwill primarily related to a
non-cash impairment charge at our vacation ownership business
which is discussed in further detail in
Note 5Intangible Assets and
Note 21Restructuring and Impairments and the impact
of currency translation at our vacation exchange and rentals
business, partially offset by the acquisition of USFS in July
2008 within our lodging business and (ii) a decrease of
$74 million in cash and cash equivalents, which is
discussed in further detail in Liquidity and Capital
ResourcesCash Flows. Such decreases were partially
offset by (i) a $310 million increase in vacation
ownership contract receivables, net as a result of higher
vacation ownership contract originations during 2008 as compared
to 2007, (ii) an $84 million increase in inventory
primarily related to vacation ownership inventories associated
with a reduction in VOI sales and increased points exchange
activity within our vacation exchange and rentals business,
(iii) a $79 million increase in other current assets
primarily due to increased current securitized restricted cash
resulting from the timing of cash we are required to set aside
in connection with additional vacation ownership contract
receivables securitizations, the deferral of bonus
points/credits that are provided as purchase incentives on VOI
sales and deferred financing costs related to our 2008 bank
conduit facility at our vacation ownership business, partially
offset by lower escrow deposit restricted cash primarily due to
the utilization of cash for renovations at two of our Landal
parks at our vacation exchange and rentals business and timing
between the deeding and sales processes for certain VOI sales at
our vacation ownership business, (iv) a $47 million
increase in deferred income taxes primarily attributable to
higher accrued liabilities, (v) a $41 million increase
in trademarks primarily related to the acquisition of USFS in
July 2008, partially offset by an impairment relating to our
initiative to rebrand two of our vacation ownership trademarks
to the Wyndham brand and an impairment relating to one of our
vacation exchange and rental trademarks and (vi) a
$29 million increase in property and equipment primarily
due to incremental construction in progress primarily related to
property development activity at our lodging business and
increased buildings within our vacation ownership business,
partially offset by the impact of currency translation on
equipment and the impairment of fixed assets at our vacation
exchange and rentals business.
Total liabilities increased $288 million primarily due to
(i) $187 million of additional net borrowings
reflecting net changes of $458 million in our other
long-term debt primarily related to our revolving credit
facility, partially offset by a decrease of $271 million in
our securitized vacation ownership debt, (ii) a
$109 million increase in deferred income primarily due to
increased sales of vacation ownership properties under
development and the deferral of bonus points/credits that are
provided as purchase incentives on VOI sales, partially offset
by a reduction in advance bookings within our vacation exchange
and rentals business, (iii) a $53 million increase in
other non-current liabilities primarily related to a change in
fair value of our debt derivative instruments due to reduced
interest rates and increased tenant improvement allowances
recognized on new leases and (iv) a $39 million
increase in deferred income taxes primarily attributable to an
increase in the installment sales of VOIs, partially offset by
the change in other comprehensive income. Such increases were
partially offset by (i) a $64 million decrease in
accounts payable primarily due to lower bookings and the impact
of currency translation at our vacation rental and travel agency
businesses and timing differences of payments on accounts
payable at each of our businesses and (ii) a
$28 million decrease in accrued expenses and other current
liabilities primarily due to decreased accrued legal settlements
at our vacation ownership business, decreased employee
compensation related expenses across our businesses and
decreased accrued development expenses at our vacation exchange
and rentals business due to the initiation of required
refurbishments at two of our Landal parks, partially offset by
accrued expenses related to restructuring initiatives at our
vacation ownership and vacation exchange and rentals businesses.
Total stockholders equity decreased $1,174 million
due to (i) $1,074 million of net loss generated during
2008, (ii) $76 million of currency translation
adjustments primarily due to the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar, (iii) the payment of $29 million in
dividends, (iv) $19 million of unrealized losses on
cash flow hedges, (v) $13 million of treasury stock
purchased through our stock repurchase program and (vi) a
$3 million decrease to our pool of excess tax benefits
available to absorb tax deficiencies due to the exercise and
vesting of equity awards. Such decreases were partially offset
by (i) a change of $28 million in deferred equity
compensation due to equity compensation
56
expense, (ii) $8 million of excess cash related to the
Separation returned to us by our former Parent and
(iii) $5 million as a result of the exercise of stock
options during 2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Currently, our financing needs are supported by cash generated
from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. In addition, certain funding requirements of our
vacation ownership business are met through the issuance of
securitized and other debt to finance vacation ownership
contract receivables. We believe that access to our revolving
credit facility and our current liquidity vehicles, as well as
continued access to the debt markets
and/or
other
financing vehicles, will be sufficient to meet our ongoing
needs. If we are unable to access these markets, it will
negatively impact our liquidity position and may require us to
further adjust our business operations. See Liquidity Risk for a
description of the impact on our securitizations from the
adverse conditions suffered by the United States asset-backed
securities and commercial paper markets.
Our secured, revolving foreign credit facility expires in June
2009. We are in active dialogue with the participating banks and
potential new participants related to our secured, revolving
foreign credit facility in an attempt to renew this facility for
another
364-day
term
prior to the current renewal date. In the event that we are not
able to renew all or part of the current agreement, all or a
portion of the outstanding borrowings would become immediately
due and payable. We anticipate that we would have adequate
liquidity to meet these maturities with available cash balances
and our revolving credit facility. Our 2008 bank conduit
facility expires in November 2009. Our goal is to renew this
facility for another
364-day
term
prior to the current renewal date. In the event that we are not
able to renew all or part of the current agreement, the facility
would no longer operate as a revolving facility and would
amortize over 13 months from the expiration date.
Cash
Flows
During 2008 and 2007, we had a net change in cash and cash
equivalents of $74 million and $59 million,
respectively. The following table summarizes such changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Effects of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2007
Operating
Activities
During 2008, we generated $99 million more cash from
operating activities as compared to 2007, which principally
reflects (i) higher cash received in connection with VOI
sales for which the revenue recognition is deferred,
(ii) an increase in our provision for loan losses due to a
higher estimate of uncollectible receivables as a percentage of
VOI sales financed during 2008 as compared to 2007 and
(iii) lower investments in inventory and vacation ownership
receivables. Such changes were partially offset by a decrease in
accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily due to
(i) litigation settlements during 2008, (ii) lower
accrued marketing, commissions and employee incentive expenses
during 2008 at our vacation ownership business related to our
initiative to reduce our future VOI sales pace (see
Restructuring Plan) and (iii) a decline in advance bookings
and multi-year enrollment renewals at our vacation exchange and
rentals business, partially offset by higher accrued expenses
related to our restructuring plan. In addition, other current
assets increased primarily related to deferred commission costs
in connection with the aforementioned deferred revenue from VOI
sales.
Investing
Activities
During 2008, we used $64 million more cash for investing
activities as compared with 2007. The increase in cash outflows
relates to (i) higher acquisition-related payments of
$119 million primarily due to the acquisition of USFS and
(ii) $21 million of lower proceeds received from asset
sales primarily due to the absence of proceeds received in
connection with the sale of certain vacation ownership
properties and related assets during 2007. Such increase in cash
outflows was partially offset by (i) a decrease of
$32 million in investments primarily within our lodging and
vacation exchange and rentals businesses, (ii) a decrease
in escrow deposits restricted cash of $31 million primarily
resulting from timing differences between our deeding and sales
processes for certain VOI
57
sales and (iii) a decrease of $7 million in capital
expenditures primarily due to the absence of information
technology infrastructure enhancements during 2007 resulting
from our separation from Cendant.
Financing
Activities
During 2008, we generated $11 million less cash from
financing activities as compared with 2007, which principally
reflects (i) $889 million of lower net proceeds from
securitized vacation ownership debt, (ii) $20 million
of lower proceeds received in connection with stock option
exercises during 2008, (iii) $15 million of
incremental debt issuance costs related to our 2008 bank conduit
facility, (iv) $14 million of additional dividends
paid to shareholders during 2008, (v) $8 million of
lower tax benefits on the exercising and vesting of equity
awards and (vi) $7 million of lower capital
contributions from former Parent. Such cash outflows were
partially offset by (i) $511 million of lower spend on
our stock repurchase program and (ii) $438 million of
higher net proceeds from non-securitized borrowings primarily
related to our revolving credit facility.
We intend to continue to invest in selected capital improvements
and technological improvements in our lodging, vacation
ownership, vacation exchange and rentals and corporate
businesses. In addition, we may seek to acquire additional
franchise agreements, property management contracts, ownership
interests in hotels as part of our mixed-use properties
strategy, and exclusive agreements for vacation rental
properties on a strategic and selective basis, either directly
or through investments in joint ventures. We spent
$187 million on capital expenditures during 2008 including
the improvement of technology and maintenance of technological
advantages and routine improvements. We anticipate reducing our
spending to approximately $125 million on capital
expenditures during 2009 in order to focus on sustenance related
projects. In addition, we spent $414 million relating to
vacation ownership development projects during 2008. We believe
that our vacation ownership business will have adequate
inventory through 2010 and thus we plan to sell the vacation
ownership inventory that is currently on our balance sheet and
complete vacation ownership projects currently under
development. As a result, we anticipate reducing our spending to
approximately $175 million to $225 million on vacation
ownership development projects during 2009 and approximately
$100 million during 2010. We expect that the majority of
the expenditures that will be required to pursue our capital
spending programs, strategic investments and vacation ownership
development projects will be financed with cash flow generated
through operations. Additional expenditures are financed with
general unsecured corporate borrowings, including through the
use of available capacity under our $900 million revolving
credit facility.
Cash
Flow Outlook for 2009
During 2009, we anticipate cash flow will be neutral to
positive. Borrowings outstanding on our revolving credit
facility are expected to remain consistent at December 31,
2009 as compared to December 31, 2008. Our current forecast
is based upon the following primary assumptions (all amounts are
approximated):
|
|
|
|
i.
|
Net income of $271 million to $304 million including
after-tax restructuring charges of $18 million to
$27 million,
|
|
|
ii.
|
Depreciation and amortization of $185 million to
$195 million,
|
|
|
iii.
|
Provision for loan losses of $325 million (24% of
$1.2 billion gross VOI sales plus $150 million to
$200 million of previously deferred
percentage-of-completion
revenue. The 24% is consistent with 2008.),
|
|
|
iv.
|
Deferred tax increase of $65 million to $75 million
based upon our cash tax rate being 25% as compared to our
provision for income tax rate of 39%,
|
|
|
v.
|
Stock-based
compensation of $40 million,
|
|
|
vi.
|
Net change of zero to $50 million decrease of vacation
ownership inventory comprised of spending of $175 million
to $225 million offset by $225 million in VOI cost of
sales (16% of $1.2 billion gross VOI sales plus
$150 million to $200 million of previously deferred
percentage-of-completion
revenue. The 16% assumption is comprised of cost of sales of
25%, partially offset by inventory recoveries.),
|
|
|
vii.
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables portfolio growth
representing originations, net of collections, of
$150 million to $175 million,
|
|
|
viii.
|
Net decrease in securitized debt of $325 million to
$350 million resulting from a continued decline in vacation
ownership securitized debt leverage,
|
|
|
ix.
|
Working capital and other use of $225 million primarily
related to the recognition of previously deferred vacation
ownership
percentage-of-completion
revenue,
|
58
|
|
|
|
x.
|
Capital expenditures of $120 million to $130 million,
and
|
|
|
xi.
|
Dividend payments totaling $30 million.
|
For example, using the mid-points of the ranges noted above, the
estimated change in cash for the full year of 2009 would be as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
190
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
325
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
70
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
40
|
|
Vacation ownership inventory
|
|
|
25
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Securitized borrowings, net
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
Working capital and other
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
Dividend to shareholders
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated change in cash for 2009
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If economic conditions improve or deteriorate materially, we
would expect the amounts noted above could change. Such changes
could impact our cash flows either positively or negatively.
Other
Matters
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. During 2008, we
repurchased 628,019 shares at an average price of $21.58.
The Board of Directors 2007 authorization included
increased repurchase capacity for proceeds received from stock
option exercises. During 2008, repurchase capacity increased
$5 million from proceeds received from stock option
exercises. We suspended such program during the third quarter of
2008 and expect to defer further purchases until the
macro-economic outlook and credit environment are more
favorable. We currently have $155 million remaining
availability in our program. The amount and timing of specific
repurchases are subject to market conditions, applicable legal
requirements and other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in
the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.
As discussed below, the IRS has commenced an audit of
Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006, during which we
were included in Cendants tax returns.
The rules governing taxation are complex and subject to varying
interpretations. Therefore, our tax accruals reflect a series of
complex judgments about future events and rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the estimates
and assumptions supporting our tax accruals are reasonable, tax
audits and any related litigation could result in tax
liabilities for us that are materially different than those
reflected in our historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. The result of an audit or litigation
could have a material adverse effect on our income tax
provision, net income,
and/or
cash
flows in the period or periods to which such audit or litigation
relates.
Our recorded tax liabilities in respect of such taxable years
represent our current best estimates of the probable outcome
with respect to certain tax positions taken by Cendant for which
we would be responsible under the tax sharing agreement. As
discussed above, however, the rules governing taxation are
complex and subject to varying interpretation. There can be no
assurance that the IRS will not propose adjustments to the
returns for which we would be responsible under the tax sharing
agreement or that any such proposed adjustments would not be
material. Any determination by the IRS or a court that imposed
tax liabilities on us under the tax sharing agreement in excess
of our tax accruals could have a material adverse effect on our
income tax provision, net income,
and/or
cash
flows, which is the result of our obligations under the
Separation and Distribution Agreement, as discussed in
Note 22Separation Adjustments and Transactions with
Former Parent and Subsidiaries. We recorded $267 million of
tax liabilities pursuant to the Separation and Distribution
Agreement at December 31, 2008, which is recorded within
due to former Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. We expect the payment on a majority of these
liabilities to occur during the second half of 2010. We expect
to make such payment from cash flow generated through operations
and the use of available capacity under our $900 million
revolving credit facility.
59
Financial
Obligations
Our indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
Previous bank conduit
facility
(a)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
2008 bank conduit
facility
(b)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December
2016)
(c)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011)
(d)
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Vacation ownership bank
borrowings
(e)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents the outstanding balance
of our previous bank conduit facility that ceased operating as a
revolving facility on October 29, 2008 and will amortize in
accordance with its terms, which is expected to be approximately
two years.
|
(b)
|
|
Represents a
364-day,
$943 million, non-recourse vacation ownership bank conduit
facility, with a term through November 2009, whose capacity is
subject to our ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize the facility.
|
(c)
|
|
The balance at December 31,
2008 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$3 million of unamortized discount.
|
(d)
|
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2008, we had
$33 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as such,
the total available capacity of the revolving credit facility
was $291 million.
|
(e)
|
|
Represents a
364-day
secured revolving credit facility, which was renewed in June
2008 (expires in June 2009) and upsized from AUD
$225 million to AUD $263 million.
|
As of December 31, 2008, available capacity under our
borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Previous bank conduit facility
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 bank conduit facility
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership
debt
(a)
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011)
(b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Vacation ownership bank
borrowings
(c)
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases
(d)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,333
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
These outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by $2,906 million of underlying gross
vacation ownership contract receivables and securitization
restricted cash. The capacity of our 2008 bank conduit facility
of $943 million is reduced by $318 million of
borrowings on our previous bank conduit facility. Such amount
will be available as capacity for our 2008 bank conduit facility
as the outstanding balance on our previous bank conduit facility
amortizes in accordance with its terms, which is expected to be
approximately two years. The capacity of this facility is
subject to our ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize additional securitized borrowings.
|
(b)
|
|
The capacity under our revolving
credit facility includes availability for letters of credit. As
of December 31, 2008, the available capacity of
$324 million was further reduced by $33 million for
the issuance of letters of credit.
|
(c)
|
|
These borrowings are collateralized
by $199 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables. The capacity of this facility is subject
to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize these secured
obligations.
|
(d)
|
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
60
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
We issue debt through the securitization of vacation ownership
contract receivables (see Note 8Vacation Ownership
Contract Receivables). On May 1, 2008, we closed a series
of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2008-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$200 million. These borrowings bear interest at a weighted
average rate of 7.9% and are secured by vacation ownership
contract receivables. As of December 31, 2008, we had
$120 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes. The proceeds from these notes were used to reduce the
balance outstanding under our previous bank conduit facility
referenced below and the remaining proceeds were used for
general corporate purposes. On June 26, 2008, we closed an
additional series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2008-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$450 million. These borrowings bear interest at a weighted
average rate of 7.2% and are secured by vacation ownership
contract receivables. As of December 31, 2008, we had
$278 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes. The proceeds from these notes were used to reduce the
balance outstanding under our previous bank conduit facility
referenced below and the remaining proceeds were used for
general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2008, we had
$854 million of outstanding borrowings under term notes
entered into prior to January 1, 2008. Such securitized
debt includes fixed and floating rate term notes for which the
weighted average interest rate was 5.8%, 5.2% and 4.7% during
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
On November 10, 2008, we closed on a
364-day,
$943 million, non-recourse, vacation ownership bank conduit
facility with a term through November 2009. This facility bears
interest at variable commercial paper rates plus a spread. The
$943 million facility with an advance rate for new
borrowings of approximately 50% represents a decrease from the
$1.2 billion capacity of our previous bank conduit facility
with an advance rate of approximately 80%. The previous bank
conduit facility ceased operating as a revolving facility on
October 29, 2008 and will amortize in accordance with its
terms, which is expected to be approximately two years. The two
bank conduit facilities, on a combined basis, had a weighted
average interest rate of 4.1%, 5.9% and 5.7% during the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, our securitized vacation ownership
debt of $1,810 million is collateralized by
$2,906 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables and securitization restricted cash.
Additional usage of the capacity of our 2008 bank conduit
facility is subject to our ability to provide additional assets
to collateralize such facility. The combined weighted average
interest rate on our total securitized vacation ownership debt
was 5.2%, 5.4% and 5.1% during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cash paid related to consumer financing interest expense was
$106 million, $95 million and $59 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Other
6.00% Senior Unsecured Notes.
Our 6.00% notes,
with face value of $800 million, were issued in December
2006 for net proceeds of $796 million. The notes are
redeemable at our option at any time, in whole or in part, at
the appropriate redemption prices plus accrued interest through
the redemption date. These notes rank equally in right of
payment with all of our other senior unsecured indebtedness.
Term Loan.
During July 2006, we entered into a five-year
$300 million term loan facility which bears interest at
LIBOR plus 75 basis points. Subsequent to the inception of
this term loan facility, we entered into an interest rate swap
agreement and, as such, the interest rate is fixed at 6.2%.
Revolving Credit Facility.
We maintain a five-year
$900 million revolving credit facility which currently
bears interest at LIBOR plus 62.5 to 75 basis points. The
interest rate of this facility is dependent on our credit
ratings and the outstanding balance of borrowings on this
facility. During July 2008, we drew down on our revolving credit
facility to fund the acquisition of USFS. In addition, in
conjunction with closing the 2008 bank conduit facility, we drew
approximately $215 million on our revolving credit facility
to bring our previous bank conduit facility in line with the
lower advance rate and tighter eligibility requirements.
Vacation Ownership Bank Borrowings.
We maintain a
364-day
secured, revolving foreign credit facility used to support our
vacation ownership operations in the South Pacific. Such
facility was renewed and upsized from AUD $225 million to
AUD $263 million in June 2008 and expires in June 2009. We
are currently exploring options to renew this facility. This
facility bears interest at Australian BBSY plus a spread and had
a weighted average interest rate of 8.1%, 7.2% and 6.5% during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These secured borrowings are
collateralized by $199 million of underlying gross vacation
ownership contract receivables as of December 31, 2008. The
capacity of this facility is subject to maintaining sufficient
assets to collateralize these secured obligations.
Vacation Rental Capital Leases.
We lease vacation homes
located in European holiday parks as part of our vacation
exchange and rentals business. The majority of these leases are
recorded as capital lease obligations under generally accepted
accounting principles with corresponding assets classified
within property, plant and equipment
61
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The vacation rentals capital
lease obligations had a weighted average interest rate of 4.5%
during 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Other.
We also maintain other debt facilities which arise
through the ordinary course of operations. This debt principally
reflects $11 million of mortgage borrowings related to an
office building.
Interest expense incurred in connection with our other debt was
to $99 million, $96 million and $72 million
during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, we
recorded $11 million of interest expense related to
interest on local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions
during 2006. All such amounts are recorded within the interest
expense line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Operations. Cash paid related to such interest expense was
$100 million, $89 million and $60 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Interest expense is partially offset on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Operations by capitalized interest of
$19 million, $23 million and $16 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As debt maturities of the securitized vacation ownership debt
are based on the contractual payment terms of the underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables, actual maturities may
differ as a result of prepayments by the vacation ownership
contract receivable obligors.
The revolving credit facility, unsecured term loan and vacation
ownership bank borrowings include covenants, including the
maintenance of specific financial ratios. These financial
covenants consist of a minimum interest coverage ratio of at
least 3.0 times as of the measurement date and a maximum
leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 times on the measurement date.
The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing EBITDA (as
defined in the credit agreement and Note 20Segment
Information) by Interest Expense (as defined in the credit
agreement), excluding interest expense on any Securitization
Indebtedness and on Non-Recourse Indebtedness (as the two terms
are defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a
trailing 12 month basis preceding the measurement date. As
of December 31, 2008, our interest coverage ratio was 20.6
times. The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated
Total Indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement)
excluding any Securitization Indebtedness and any Non-Recourse
Secured debt as of the measurement date by EBITDA as measured on
a trailing 12 month basis preceding the measurement date.
As of December 31, 2008, our leverage ratio was 2.2 times.
Covenants in these credit facilities also include limitations on
indebtedness of material subsidiaries; liens; mergers,
consolidations, liquidations, dissolutions and sales of all or
substantially all assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of
default in these credit facilities include nonpayment of
principal when due; nonpayment of interest, fees or other
amounts; violation of covenants; cross payment default and cross
acceleration (in each case, to indebtedness (excluding
securitization indebtedness) in excess of $50 million); and
a change of control (the definition of which permitted our
Separation from Cendant).
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on sale and
leasebacks, and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and sales of
all or substantially all assets. Events of default in the notes
include nonpayment of interest, nonpayment of principal, breach
of a covenant or warranty, cross acceleration of debt in excess
of $50 million, and bankruptcy related matters.
As of December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all of
the covenants described above including the required financial
ratios.
Each of our non-recourse, securitized note borrowings contain
various triggers relating to the performance of the applicable
loan pools. For example, if the vacation ownership contract
receivables pool that collateralizes one of our securitization
notes fails to perform within the parameters established by the
contractual triggers (such as higher default or delinquency
rates), there are provisions pursuant to which the cash flows
for that pool will be maintained in the securitization as extra
collateral for the note holders or applied to amortize the
outstanding principal held by the noteholders. In the event such
provisions were triggered during 2009, we believe such cash
flows would be approximately $0 $40 million. As
of December 31, 2008, all of our securitized pools were in
compliance with applicable triggers.
Liquidity
Risk
Our vacation ownership business finances certain of its
receivables through (i) an asset-backed bank conduit
facility and (ii) periodically accessing the capital
markets by issuing asset-backed securities. None of the
currently outstanding asset-backed securities contain any
recourse provisions to us other than interest rate risk related
to swap counterparties (solely to the extent that the amount
outstanding on our notes differs from the forecasted
amortization schedule at the time of issuance).
Certain of these asset-backed securities are insured by monoline
insurers. Currently, the monoline insurers that we have used in
the past and other guarantee insurance providers are no longer
AAA rated and remain under significant ratings pressure. Since
certain monoline insurers are not positioned to write new
policies, the cost of
62
such insurance has increased and the insurance has become
difficult or impossible to obtain due to (i) decreased
competition in that business, including a reduced number of
monolines that may issue new policies due to either
(a) loss of AAA/Aaa ratings from the rating agencies or
(b) lack of confidence of market participants in the value
of such insurance and (ii) the increased spreads paid to
bond investors. Our $200 million
2008-1
term
securitization, which closed on May 1, 2008, and our
$450 million
2008-2
term
securitization, which closed on June 26, 2008, were
senior/subordinate transactions with no monoline insurance.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2007 and continuing throughout
2008 and into 2009, the asset-backed securities market and
commercial paper markets in the United States suffered adverse
market conditions. As a result, during 2008, our cost of
securitized borrowings increased due to increased spreads over
relevant benchmarks. We successfully accessed the term
securitization market during 2008, as demonstrated by the
closing of two term securitizations. However, the credit markets
continue to be virtually closed to issuers of vacation ownership
receivables asset-backed securities. In response to the
tightened asset-backed credit environment, our plan is to reduce
our need to access the asset-backed securities market during
2009.
On November 10, 2008, we closed on a
364-day,
$943 million, non-recourse, securitized vacation ownership
bank conduit facility (which is supported by commercial paper)
effective through November 2009. The $943 million facility
capacity represents a decrease from the $1.2 billion
capacity of our previous bank conduit facility. We expect that
our vacation ownership business may reduce its sales pace of
VOIs from 2008 to 2009 by approximately 40%. Accordingly, we
believe that this 2008 bank conduit facility should provide
sufficient liquidity for the lower expected sales pace and we
expect to have available liquidity to finance the sale of VOIs.
The 2008 bank conduit facility had available capacity of
$484 million as of December 31, 2008. The previous
bank conduit facility ceased operating as a revolving facility
on October 29, 2008 and will amortize in accordance with
its terms, which is expected to be approximately two years.
The 2008 bank conduit facility bears interest at variable
commercial paper rates, at higher spreads than the previous bank
conduit facility. The 2008 bank conduit facility has a lower
advance rate at approximately 50% for new borrowings compared to
the previous bank conduit facility at approximately 80%. As a
result of the current credit market, the terms of the 2008 bank
conduit facility are less favorable than the previous bank
conduit facility. As such, in conjunction with closing the 2008
bank conduit facility, we drew approximately $215 million
on our revolving credit facility to bring our previous bank
conduit facility in line with the lower advance rate and tighter
eligibility requirements. At December 31, 2008, we have
$291 million of availability under our revolving credit
facility. To the extent that the recent increases in funding
costs in the securitization and commercial paper markets
persist, it will negatively impact the cost of such borrowings.
A long-term disruption to the asset-backed or commercial paper
markets could adversely impact our ability to obtain such
financings.
Our Wyndham Vacation Resorts Asia Pacific Pty Ltd. operations
are funded by
364-day
bank
facilities with a total capacity of $184 million as of
December 31, 2008 expiring in June 2009. These facilities
had a total of $159 million outstanding as of
December 31, 2008 and are secured by consumer loan
receivables, as well as a Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
guaranty. We are in active dialogue with the participating banks
and potential new participants. Our goal is to renew this
facility for another
364-day
term
prior to the current renewal date. While we expect to renew the
agreement, we anticipate that current bank lending conditions
will have a negative impact on the terms and capacity of the
existing agreement. In addition to renewing the current
agreement, we are exploring alternate financing means including
an asset backed securitization conduit. In the event we are not
able to renew all or part of the current agreement, all or a
portion of the outstanding borrowings will become immediately
due and payable. We anticipate that we would have adequate
liquidity to meet these maturities with available cash balances
and our revolving credit facility. In addition, we can reduce
funding needs by slowing spending on new inventory and reducing
the financing of consumer loans used to purchase our vacation
ownership properties.
Some of our vacation ownership developments are supported by
surety bonds provided by affiliates of certain insurance
companies in order to meet regulatory requirements of certain
states. In the ordinary course of our business, we have
assembled commitments from thirteen surety providers in the
amount of $1.5 billion, of which we had $759 million
outstanding as of December 31, 2008. The availability,
terms and conditions, and pricing of such bonding capacity is
dependent on, among other things, continued financial strength
and stability of the insurance company affiliates providing such
bonding capacity, the general availability of such capacity and
our corporate credit rating. If such bonding capacity is
unavailable or, alternatively, the terms and conditions and
pricing of such bonding capacity may be unacceptable to us, the
cost of development of our vacation ownership units could be
negatively impacted.
Our liquidity position may also be negatively affected by
unfavorable conditions in the capital markets in which we
operate or if our vacation ownership contract receivables
portfolios do not meet specified portfolio credit parameters.
Our liquidity as it relates to our vacation ownership contract
receivables securitization program could be adversely affected
if we were to fail to renew or replace any of the facilities on
their renewal dates or if a particular receivables pool were to
fail to meet certain ratios, which could occur in certain
instances if the default rates or
63
other credit metrics of the underlying vacation ownership
contract receivables deteriorate. Our ability to sell securities
backed by our vacation ownership contract receivables depends on
the continued ability and willingness of capital market
participants to invest in such securities.
During December 2008, Moodys Investors Service
(Moodys) downgraded our senior unsecured debt
rating to Baa3 and left our ratings under review for possible
downgrade. During July 2008, Standard & Poors
(S&P) downgraded our senior unsecured debt
rating to BBB- with a stable outlook. During October
2008, S&P assigned a negative outlook to our
senior unsecured debt. A security rating is not a recommendation
to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or
withdrawal by the assigning rating organization. Currently, we
expect no (i) material increase in interest expense
and/or
(ii) material reduction in the availability of bonding
capacity from the aforementioned downgrade or negative outlook;
however, a further downgrade by Moodys
and/or
S&P could impact our future borrowing
and/or
bonding costs and availability of such bonding capacity.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to us and Avis Budget Group to satisfy the
fair value of Realogys indemnification obligations for the
Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy does
not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they become
due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a $500 million
irrevocable standby letter of credit from a major commercial
bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon which demand may be
made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy its obligations for
its share of the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The
letter of credit can be adjusted from time to time based upon
the outstanding contingent liabilities and has an expiration of
September 2013, subject to renewal and certain provisions. The
issuance of this letter of credit does not relieve or limit
Realogys obligations for these liabilities.
Seasonality
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net revenues and net
income from our franchise and management fees, commission income
earned from renting vacation properties, annual subscription
fees or annual membership dues, as applicable, and exchange
transaction fees and sales of VOIs. Revenues from franchise and
management fees are generally higher in the second and third
quarters than in the first or fourth quarters, because of
increased leisure travel during the summer months. Revenues from
rental income earned from booking vacation rentals are generally
highest in the third quarter, when vacation rentals are highest.
Revenues from vacation exchange transaction fees are generally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
our vacation exchange business plan and book their vacations for
the year. Revenues from sales of VOIs are generally higher in
the second and third quarters than in other quarters. The
seasonality of our business may cause fluctuations in our
quarterly operating results. As we expand into new markets and
geographical locations, we may experience increased or different
seasonality dynamics that create fluctuations in operating
results different from the fluctuations we have experienced in
the past.
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of our common stock to Cendant shareholders, we
entered into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant
(pursuant to the assumption of certain liabilities and the
obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for such
liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5%, while Realogy is
responsible for the remaining 62.5%. The amount of liabilities
which we assumed in connection with the Separation was
$343 million and $349 million at December 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. These amounts
were comprised of certain Cendant corporate liabilities which
were recorded on the books of Cendant as well as additional
liabilities which were established for guarantees issued at the
date of Separation related to certain unresolved contingent
matters and certain others that could arise during the guarantee
period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the companies
responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities were to
default in its payment of costs or expenses related to any such
liability, we would be responsible for a portion of the
defaulting party or parties obligation. We also provided a
default guarantee related to certain deferred compensation
arrangements related to certain current and former senior
officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and Travelport. These
arrangements, which are discussed in more detail below, have
been valued upon the Separation in accordance with Financial
Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45)
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others and recorded as liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. To the extent such recorded liabilities are not
adequate to cover the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will
be reflected as an expense to the results of operations in
future periods.
64
The $343 million of Separation related liabilities is
comprised of $35 million for litigation matters,
$267 million for tax liabilities, $27 million for
liabilities of previously sold businesses of Cendant,
$7 million for other contingent and corporate liabilities
and $7 million of liabilities where the calculated
FIN 45 guarantee amount exceeded the SFAS No. 5
Accounting for Contingencies liability assumed at
the date of Separation (of which $5 million of the
$7 million pertain to litigation liabilities). In
connection with these liabilities, $80 million are recorded
in current due to former Parent and subsidiaries and
$265 million are recorded in long-term due to former Parent
and subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. We are indemnifying Cendant for these contingent
liabilities and therefore any payments would be made to the
third party through the former Parent. The $7 million
relating to the FIN 45 guarantees is recorded in other
current liabilities at December 31, 2008 on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. We currently expect to pay
$42 million relating to these liabilities during 2009 and
the remaining $301 million during 2010, although the actual
timing is dependent on a variety of factors beyond our control.
In addition, at December 31, 2008, we have $3 million
of receivables due from former Parent and subsidiaries primarily
relating to income tax refunds, which is recorded in current due
from former Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Such receivables totaled $18 million at
December 31, 2007.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which we issued
guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities
- We assumed
37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising
out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is
named as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will
continue until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. We will
indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to make
payments related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
indemnification obligation relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherently uncertain nature of the litigation process, the
timing of payments related to these liabilities cannot be
reasonably predicted, but is expected to occur over several
years. Since the Separation, Cendant settled a number of these
lawsuits and we assumed a portion of the related indemnification
obligations. As discussed above, for each settlement, we paid
37.5% of the aggregate settlement amount to Cendant. Our payment
obligations under the settlements were greater or less than our
accruals, depending on the matter. During 2007, Cendant received
an adverse order in a litigation matter for which we retain a
37.5% indemnification obligation. We have filed an appeal
related to this adverse order. As a result of the order,
however, we increased our contingent litigation accrual for this
matter during 2007 by $27 million. As a result of these
settlements and payments to Cendant, as well as other reductions
and accruals for developments in active litigation matters, our
aggregate accrual for outstanding Cendant contingent litigation
liabilities decreased from $36 million at December 31,
2007 to $35 million at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities
- We are generally
liable for 37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities. In
addition, each of us, Cendant and Realogy may be responsible for
100% of certain of Cendants tax liabilities that will
provide the responsible party with a future, offsetting tax
benefit. We will pay to Cendant the amount of taxes allocated
pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement, as amended during the
third quarter of 2008, for the payment of certain taxes. As a
result of the amendment to the Tax Sharing Agreement, we
recorded a gross up of our contingent tax liability and have a
corresponding deferred tax asset of $30 million as of
December 31, 2008. This liability will remain outstanding
until tax audits related to the 2006 tax year are completed or
the statutes of limitations governing the 2006 tax year have
passed. Our maximum exposure cannot be quantified as tax
regulations are subject to interpretation and the outcome of tax
audits or litigation is inherently uncertain. Prior to the
Separation, we were included in the consolidated federal and
state income tax returns of Cendant through the Separation date
for the 2006 period then ended. Balances due to Cendant for
these pre-Separation tax returns and related tax attributes were
estimated as of December 31, 2006 and have since been
adjusted in connection with the filing of the pre-Separation tax
returns. These balances will again be adjusted after the
ultimate settlement of the related tax audits of these periods.
|
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate
liabilities
- We have assumed 37.5% of corporate
liabilities of Cendant including liabilities relating to
(i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses,
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, if any,
and (iii) generally any actions with respect to the
Separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party.
Our maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as this
guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be made
against Cendant. We assessed the probability and amount of
potential liability related to this guarantee based on the
extent and nature of historical experience.
|
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation
arrangements
- In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, we
have guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating to
amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This guarantee
will remain outstanding until such deferred compensation
balances are distributed to the respective officers and
directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
|
65
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to our Separation from Cendant, we entered into a
Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis Budget
Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agreed to provide us with various services, including
services relating to human resources and employee benefits,
payroll, financial systems management, treasury and cash
management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA were provided by one
of the separated companies following the date of such
companys separation from Cendant. Such services were
substantially completed as of December 31, 2007. During
2008 and 2007, we recorded $1 million and $13 million,
respectively, of expenses in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations related to these agreements. During 2006, we recorded
$8 million of expenses and less than $1 million in
other revenues.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2007, we incurred costs of $16 million in connection
with executing the Separation, consisting primarily of expenses
related to the rebranding initiative at our vacation ownership
business and certain transitional expenses. During 2006, we
incurred costs of $99 million in connection with executing
our separation from Cendant, consisting primarily of
(i) the acceleration of vesting of certain employee
incentive awards and the related equitable adjustments of such
awards, (ii) an impairment charge due to a rebranding
initiative for our Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks and
(iii) consulting and payroll-related services.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our future contractual
obligations for the twelve month periods beginning on
January 1st of each of the years set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Securitized
debt
(a)
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
Long-term
debt
(b)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
Other purchase
commitments
(c)
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
Contingent
liabilities
(d)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
(e)
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,143
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
1,667
|
|
|
$
|
5,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Amounts exclude interest expense,
as the amounts ultimately paid will depend on amounts
outstanding under our secured obligations and interest rates in
effect during each period.
|
(b)
|
|
Excludes future cash payments
related to interest expense on our 6.00% senior unsecured
notes and term loan of $66 million during both 2009 and
2010, $59 million during 2011, $48 million during both
2012 and 2013 and $144 million thereafter.
|
(c)
|
|
Primarily represents commitments
for the development of vacation ownership properties. Total
includes approximately $100 million of vacation ownership
development commitments, which we may terminate at minimal to no
cost, and 2009 includes $50 million of vacation ownership
development commitments that could be delayed until 2011 or
later.
|
(d)
|
|
Primarily represents certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities
and 37.5% of Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities,
which we assumed and are responsible for pursuant to our
separation from Cendant.
|
(e)
|
|
Excludes $23 million of our
liability for unrecognized tax benefits associated with
FIN 48 since it is not reasonably estimatable to determine
the periods in which such liability would be settled with the
respective tax authorities.
|
In addition to the above and in connection with our separation
from Cendant, we entered into certain guarantee commitments with
Cendant (pursuant to our assumption of certain liabilities and
our obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. Additionally, if any of the companies responsible
for all or a portion of such liabilities were to default in its
payment of costs or expenses related to any such liability, we
are responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provide a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant and Realogy. These arrangements were valued upon our
separation from Cendant with the assistance of third-party
experts in accordance with FIN 45 and recorded as
liabilities on our balance sheet. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to our
results of operations in future periods. See Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with former Parent and Subsidiaries
discussion for details of guaranteed liabilities.
66
Other
Commercial Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
Purchase Commitments.
In the normal course of business,
we make various commitments to purchase goods or services from
specific suppliers, including those related to vacation
ownership resort development and other capital expenditures.
Purchase commitments made by us as of December 31, 2008
aggregated $778 million. Individually, such commitments
range as high as $100 million related to the development of
a vacation ownership resort. The majority of the commitments
relate to the development of vacation ownership properties
(aggregating $512 million; $236 million of which
relates to 2009).
Standard Guarantees/Indemnifications.
In the ordinary
course of business, we enter into agreements that contain
standard guarantees and indemnities whereby we indemnify another
party for specified breaches of or third-party claims relating
to an underlying agreement. Such underlying agreements are
typically entered into by one of our subsidiaries. The various
underlying agreements generally govern purchases, sales or
outsourcing of assets or businesses, leases of real estate,
licensing of trademarks, development of vacation ownership
properties, access to credit facilities, derivatives and
issuances of debt securities. While a majority of these
guarantees and indemnifications extend only for the duration of
the underlying agreement, some survive the expiration of the
agreement. We are not able to estimate the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees and
indemnifications as the triggering events are not predictable.
In certain cases we maintain insurance coverage that may
mitigate any potential payments.
Other Guarantees/Indemnifications.
In the ordinary course
of business, our vacation ownership business provides guarantees
to certain owners associations for funds required to
operate and maintain vacation ownership properties in excess of
assessments collected from owners of the VOIs. We may be
required to fund such excess as a result of unsold Company-owned
VOIs or failure by owners to pay such assessments. These
guarantees extend for the duration of the underlying subsidy
agreements (which generally approximate one year and are
renewable on an annual basis) or until a stipulated percentage
(typically 80% or higher) of related VOIs are sold. The maximum
potential future payments that we could be required to make
under these guarantees was approximately $350 million as of
December 31, 2008. We would only be required to pay this
maximum amount if none of the owners assessed paid their
assessments. Any assessments collected from the owners of the
VOIs would reduce the maximum potential amount of future
payments to be made by us. Additionally, should we be required
to fund the deficit through the payment of any owners
assessments under these guarantees, we would be permitted access
to the property for its own use and may use that property to
engage in revenue-producing activities, such as rentals. During
2008, 2007 and 2006, we made payments related to these
guarantees of $7 million, $5 million and
$6 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and
2007, we maintained a liability in connection with these
guarantees of $37 million and $30 million,
respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into hotel
management agreements which may provide a guarantee by us of
minimum returns to the hotel owner. Under such guarantees, we
are required to compensate for any shortfall over the life of
the management agreement up to a specified aggregate amount. Our
exposure under these guarantees is partially mitigated by our
ability to terminate any such management agreement if certain
targeted operating results are not met. Additionally, we are
able to recapture a portion or all of the shortfall payments and
any waived fees in the event that future operating results
exceed targets. The maximum potential amount of future payments
to be made under these guarantees is $15 million. The
underlying agreements would not require payment until 2010 or
thereafter. As of both December 31, 2008 and 2007, we
maintained a liability in connection with these guarantees of
less than $1 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Securitizations.
We pool qualifying vacation ownership
contract receivables and sell them to bankruptcy-remote entities
all of which are consolidated into the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008.
Letters of Credit.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
we had $33 million and $53 million, respectively, of
irrevocable standby letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
relate to support for development activity at our vacation
ownership business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are
required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain
as they pertain to future events. However, events that are
outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they
cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and
assumptions. If there is a significant unfavorable change to
current conditions, it could result in a material adverse impact
to our consolidated and combined results of operations,
financial position and liquidity. We believe that the estimates
and assumptions we used when preparing our financial statements
were the most appropriate at that time. Presented below are
those accounting policies that we believe require subjective and
complex judgments that could potentially affect reported
results. However, the majority of our businesses operate in
67
environments where we are paid a fee for a service performed,
and therefore the results of the majority of our recurring
operations are recorded in our financial statements using
accounting policies that are not particularly subjective, nor
complex.
Vacation Ownership Revenue Recognition.
Our sales of VOIs
are either cash sales or seller-financed sales. In order for us
to recognize revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method
of accounting described in SFAS No. 66,
Accounting of Sales of Real Estate for fully
constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must have been
executed, the statutory rescission period must have expired
(after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a refund
except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have been
deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations must
have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into consideration
the fair value of certain incentives provided to the purchaser
when assessing the adequacy of the purchasers initial
investment. In those cases where financing is provided to the
purchaser by us, the purchaser is obligated to remit monthly
payments under financing contracts that represent the
purchasers continuing investment. The contractual terms of
seller-provided financing arrangements require that the
contractual level of annual principal payments be sufficient to
amortize the loan over a customary period for the VOI being
financed, which is generally ten years, and payments under the
financing contracts begin within 45 days of the sale and
receipt of the minimum down payment of 10%. Prior to 2006, our
provision for loan losses was presented as expenses on the
Combined Statements of Operations. Upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations (see
Allowance for Loan Losses discussed below).
If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the percentage-of-completion method
of accounting provided that the preliminary construction phase
is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met (to
assure that the property will not revert to a rental property).
The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be complete
when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to the sale
are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract is
cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable expenses
are charged to the current period as part of operating expenses
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.
Changes in costs could lead to adjustments to the percentage of
completion status of a project, which may result in difference
in the timing and amount of revenue recognized from the
construction of vacation ownership properties. This policy
changed upon our adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2,
which is discussed in greater detail in Note 2 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
In our Vacation Ownership
segment, we provide for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations at the time of VOI sales by recording a
provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. We assess the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses based on the historical performance of
similar vacation ownership contract receivables. We use a
technique referred to as static pool analysis, which tracks
defaults for each years sales over the entire life of
those contract receivables. We consider current defaults, past
due aging, historical write-offs of contracts, consumer credit
scores (FICO scores) in the assessment of borrowers credit
strength and expected loan performance. We also consider whether
the historical economic conditions are comparable to current
economic conditions. If current conditions differ from the
conditions in effect when the historical experience was
generated, we adjust the allowance for loan losses to reflect
the expected effects of the current environment on
uncollectibility. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152
and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is
classified as a reduction to revenue with no change made to
prior periods presented.
Intangible Assets.
With regard to the goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded in connection with
business combinations, we annually (during the fourth quarter of
each year subsequent to completing our annual forecasting
process) or, more frequently if circumstances indicate
impairment may have occurred that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount, review their carrying values as required by
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. We evaluate goodwill for impairment using the
two-step process prescribed in SFAS No. 142. The first
step is to compare the estimated
68
fair value of any reporting unit within the company that have
recorded goodwill with the recorded net book value (including
the goodwill) of the reporting unit. If the estimated fair value
of the reporting unit is higher than the recorded net book
value, no impairment is deemed to exist and no further testing
is required. If, however, the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit is below the recorded net book value, then a
second step must be performed to determine the goodwill
impairment required, if any. In this second step, the estimated
fair value from the first step is used as the purchase price in
a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. Purchase
business combination accounting rules are followed to determine
a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the reporting
units assets and liabilities. The residual amount of
goodwill that results from this hypothetical purchase price
allocation is compared to the recorded amount of goodwill for
the reporting unit, and the recorded amount is written down to
the hypothetical amount, if lower. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, we have determined that our reporting
units are the same as our reportable segments.
Because quoted market prices for our reporting units are not
available, management must apply judgment in determining the
estimated fair value of these reporting units for purposes of
performing the annual goodwill impairment test. Management uses
all available information to make these fair value
determinations, including the present values of expected future
cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks
involved in the assets. Inherent in such fair value
determinations are certain judgments and estimates relating to
future cash flows, including our interpretation of current
economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about
our strategic plans with regard to our operations. To the extent
additional information arises, market conditions change or our
strategies change, it is possible that our conclusion regarding
whether existing goodwill is impaired could change and result in
a material effect on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations. In performing our impairment analysis, we
develop our estimated fair values for our reporting units using
a combination of the discounted cash flow methodology and the
market multiple methodology.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by
estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows
to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate
applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the
present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and
the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future
cash flows. The discounted cash flow methodology uses our
projections of financial performance for a five-year period. The
most significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow
methodology are the discount rate, the terminal value and
expected future revenues, gross margins and operating margins,
which vary among reporting units.
We use a market multiple methodology to estimate the terminal
value of each reporting unit by comparing such reporting unit to
other publicly traded companies that are similar from an
operational and economic standpoint. The market multiple
methodology compares each reporting unit to the comparable
companies on the basis of risk characteristics in order to
determine the risk profile relative to the comparable companies
as a group. This analysis generally focuses on quantitative
considerations, which include financial performance and other
quantifiable data, and qualitative considerations, which include
any factors which are expected to impact future financial
performance. The most significant assumption affecting our
estimate of the terminal value of each reporting unit is the
multiple of the enterprise value to earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation and amortization.
To support our estimate of the individual reporting unit fair
values, a comparison is performed between the sum of the fair
values of the reporting units and our market capitalization. We
use an average of our market capitalization over a reasonable
period preceding the impairment testing date as being more
reflective of our stock price trend than a single day,
point-in-time
market price. The difference is an implied control premium,
which represents the acknowledgment that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock may not be
representative of the fair value of the company as a whole.
Estimates of a companys control premium are highly
judgmental and depend on capital market and macro-economic
conditions overall. We evaluate the implied control premium for
reasonableness.
Based on the results of our impairment evaluation performed in
the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a non-cash
$1,342 million charge for the impairment of goodwill at our
vacation ownership reporting unit, where all of the goodwill
previously recorded was determined to be impaired.
The aggregate carrying values of our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets were $1,353 million and
$660 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008
and $2,723 million and $620 million, respectively, as
of December 31, 2007. Our goodwill is allocated between our
lodging ($297 million) and vacation exchange and rentals
($1,056 million) reporting units and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets are allocated among our three reporting units.
We continue to monitor the goodwill recorded at our lodging and
vacation exchange and rentals reporting units for indicators of
impairment. If economic conditions were to deteriorate more than
expected, or other significant assumptions such as estimates of
terminal value were to change significantly, we may be required
to record an impairment of the goodwill balance at our lodging
and vacation and exchange and rentals reporting units.
69
Business Combinations.
A component of our growth strategy
has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our
existing operations. We account for business combinations in
accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations and related literature. Accordingly, we
allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based upon their estimated fair values at the date of purchase.
The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of
the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
In determining the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various
recognized valuation methods including present value modeling
and referenced market values (where available). Further, we make
assumptions within certain valuation techniques including
discount rates and timing of future cash flows. Valuations are
performed by management or independent valuation specialists
under managements supervision, where appropriate. We
believe that the estimated fair values assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable
assumptions that marketplace participants would use. However,
such assumptions are inherently uncertain and actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Accounting for Restructuring Activities.
We have
committed and may continue to commit to restructuring actions
and activities associated with strategic realignment initiatives
targeted principally at reducing costs, enhancing organizational
efficiency and consolidating and rationalizing existing
processes and facilities, which are accounted for under
SFAS No. 112, Employers Accounting for
Post Employment Benefits and SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities. Our restructuring actions require us to make
significant estimates in several areas including:
(i) expenses for severance and related benefit costs;
(ii) the ability to generate sublease income, as well as
our ability to terminate lease obligations; and
(iii) contract terminations. The amounts that we have
accrued at December 31, 2008 represent our best estimate of
the obligations that we expect to incur in connection with these
actions, but could be subject to change due to various factors
including market conditions and the outcome of negotiations with
third parties. Should the actual amounts differ from our
estimates, the amount of the restructuring charges could be
materially impacted.
Income Taxes.
We recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets to
assess their potential realization and establish a valuation
allowance for portions of such assets that we believe will not
be ultimately realized. In performing this review, we make
estimates and assumptions regarding projected future taxable
income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing
temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning
strategies. A change in these assumptions could cause an
increase or decrease to our valuation allowance resulting in an
increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, which could
materially impact our results of operations.
Changes
in Accounting Policies
During 2008, we adopted the following standards as a result of
the issuance of new accounting pronouncements:
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
SAB 110, Use of a Simplified Method in
Developing an Estimate of Expected Term of Plain
Vanilla Share Options
|
We will adopt the following recently issued standards as
required:
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations
|
|
|
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statementsan Amendment of ARB
No. 51
|
|
|
SFAS No. 161, Disclosure about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activitiesan amendment of
SFAS No. 133
|
For detailed information regarding these pronouncements and the
impact thereof on our financial statements, see Note 2 to
our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We use various financial instruments, particularly swap
contracts and interest rate caps to manage and reduce the
interest rate risk related to our debt. Foreign currency
forwards and options are also used to manage and reduce the
foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with our foreign
currency denominated receivables, payables and forecasted
royalties, forecasted earnings and cash flows of foreign
subsidiaries and other transactions.
We are exclusively an end user of these instruments, which are
commonly referred to as derivatives. We do not engage in
trading, market making or other speculative activities in the
derivatives markets. More detailed
70
information about these financial instruments is provided in
Note 19 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements. Our principal market exposures are interest and
foreign currency rate risks.
|
|
|
|
|
Our primary interest rate exposure as of December 31, 2008
was to interest rate fluctuations in the United States,
specifically LIBOR and asset-backed commercial paper interest
rates due to their impact on variable rate borrowings and other
interest rate sensitive liabilities. In addition, interest rate
movements in one country, as well as relative interest rate
movements between countries can impact us. We anticipate that
LIBOR and asset-backed commercial paper rates will remain a
primary market risk exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
We have foreign currency rate exposure to exchange rate
fluctuations worldwide and particularly with respect to the
British pound and Euro. We anticipate that such foreign currency
exchange rate risk will remain a market risk exposure for the
foreseeable future.
|
We assess our market risk based on changes in interest rates
utilizing a sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis
measures the potential impact in earnings, fair values and cash
flows based on a hypothetical 10% change (increase and decrease)
in interest rates. We have approximately $3.8 billion of
debt outstanding as of December 31, 2008. Of that total,
$1.3 billion was issued as variable rate debt and has not
been synthetically converted to fixed rate debt via an interest
rate swap. A hypothetical 10% change in our effective weighted
average interest rate would increase or decrease interest
expense by $1 million.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short-term
nature of these assets. We use a discounted cash flow model in
determining the fair values of vacation ownership contract
receivables. The primary assumptions used in determining fair
value are prepayment speeds, estimated loss rates and discount
rates. We use a duration-based model in determining the impact
of interest rate shifts on our debt and interest rate
derivatives. The primary assumption used in these models is that
a 10% increase or decrease in the benchmark interest rate
produces a parallel shift in the yield curve across all
maturities.
We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in
the value of our foreign currency derivatives used by us to
hedge underlying exposure that primarily consist of the
non-functional current assets and liabilities of us and our
subsidiaries. The primary assumption used in these models is a
hypothetical 10% weakening or strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against all our currency exposures as of
December 31, 2008. The gains and losses on the hedging
instruments are largely offset by the gains and losses on the
underlying assets, liabilities or expected cash flows. At
December 31, 2008, the absolute notional amount of our
outstanding hedging instruments was $462 million. A
hypothetical 10% change in the foreign currency exchange rates
would result in an increase or decrease of $12 million in
the fair value of the hedging instrument at December 31,
2008. Such a change would be largely offset by an opposite
effect on the underlying assets, liabilities and expected cash
flows.
Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors
including the volatility present within the markets and the
liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent
in the sensitivity analyses presented. While probably the most
meaningful analysis, these shock tests are
constrained by several factors, including the necessity to
conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the
inability to include the complex market reactions that normally
would arise from the market shifts modeled.
We used December 31, 2008 market rates on outstanding
financial instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis
separately for each of our market risk exposuresinterest
and currency rate instruments. The estimates are based on the
market risk sensitive portfolios described in the preceding
paragraphs and assume instantaneous, parallel shifts in interest
rate yield curves and exchange rates.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See Financial Statements and Financial Statement Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGE
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
Not Applicable
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with
the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
the end of
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material
information required to be included in our reports filed with
the Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act. Our management assessed the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework.
Based on this
assessment, our management believes that, as of
December 31, 2008, our internal control over financial
reporting is effective. Our independent registered public
accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
which is included within their audit opinion on
page F-2.
|
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Identification
of Directors.
Information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Election of Directors
and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Identification
of Executive Officers.
The following provides information for each of our executive
officers.
Stephen P. Holmes, 52, has served as the Chairman of our Board
of Directors and as our Chief Executive Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was a
director since May 2003 of the already-existing, wholly owned
subsidiary of Cendant that held the assets and liabilities of
Cendants hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses before our separation from Cendant and has
served as a director of Wyndham Worldwide since the separation
in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was Vice Chairman and Director of
Cendant and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Cendants Travel Content Division from December 1997 until
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was
Vice Chairman of HFS Incorporated, from September 1996 until
December 1997 and was a director of HFS from June 1994 until
December 1997. From July 1990 through September 1996,
Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of HFS.
Franz S. Hanning, 55, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership, since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Hanning was the
Chief Executive Officer of Cendants Timeshare Resort Group
from March 2005 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Mr. Hanning served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Fairfield Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc.) from April 2001, when Cendant acquired
Fairfield, to March 2005 and as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed
WorldMark by Wyndham) from August 2004 to March 2005.
Mr. Hanning joined Fairfield in 1982 and held several key
leadership positions with Fairfield, including Regional Vice
President, Executive Vice President of Sales and Chief Operating
Officer.
Geoffrey A. Ballotti, 47, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Group RCI, since March 2008. Prior to joining
Group RCI, from October 2003 to March 2008, Mr. Ballotti
was President, North America Division of Starwood Hotels and
Resorts Worldwide. From 1989 to 2003, Mr. Ballotti held
leadership positions of increasing responsibility at Starwood
Hotels and Resorts Worldwide including Executive Vice President,
Operations, Senior Vice President, Southern Europe and Managing
Director, Ciga Spa, Italy.
Eric A. Danziger, 54, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group, since December 2008.
From August 2006 to December 2008, Mr. Danziger was Chief
Executive Officer of WhiteFence, Inc., an online site for home
services firm. From June 2001 to August 2006, Mr. Danziger
was President and Chief Executive Officer of ZipRealty, a real
estate brokerage. From April 1998 to June 2001,
Mr. Danziger was President and Chief Operating Officer of
Carlson Hotels Worldwide. From June 1996 to August 1998,
Mr. Danziger was President and CEO of Starwood Hotels
and Resorts Worldwide. From September 1990 to June 1996,
Mr. Danziger was President of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts.
Virginia M. Wilson, 54, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Wilson was Executive Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer of Cendant from September
2003 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From
October 1999 until August 2003, Ms. Wilson served as Senior
Vice President and Controller for MetLife, Inc., a provider of
insurance and other financial services. From 1996 until 1999,
Ms. Wilson served as Senior Vice President and Controller
for
72
Transamerica Life Companies, an insurance and financial services
company. Prior to Transamerica, Ms. Wilson was an Audit
Partner of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Scott G. McLester, 46, has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel since our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. Mr. McLester was Senior Vice President, Legal
for Cendant from April 2004 until our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. McLester was Group Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from March 2002 to April 2004, Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from February 2001 to March 2002 and Senior Counsel for
Cendant from June 2000 to February 2001. Prior to joining
Cendant, Mr. McLester was a Vice President in the Law
Department of Merrill Lynch in New York and a partner with the
law firm of Carpenter, Bennett and Morrissey in Newark, New
Jersey.
Mary R. Falvey, 48, has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Human Resources Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Falvey was Executive Vice
President, Global Human Resources for Cendants Vacation
Network Group from April 2005 until our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. From March 2000 to April 2005, Ms. Falvey
served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources for RCI.
From January 1998 to March 2000, Ms. Falvey was Vice
President of Human Resources for Cendants Hotel Division
and Corporate Contact Center group. Prior to joining Cendant,
Ms. Falvey held various leadership positions in the human
resources division of Nabisco Foods Company.
Thomas F. Anderson, 44, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Real Estate Development Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2003 until July
2006, Mr. Anderson was Executive Vice President, Strategic
Acquisitions and Development of Cendants Timeshare Resort
Group. From January 2000 until February 2003, Mr. Anderson
was Senior Vice President, Corporate Real Estate for Cendant
Corporation. From November 1998 until December 1999,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Real Estate Services,
Coldwell Banker Commercial. From March 1995 to October 1998,
Mr. Anderson was General Manager of American Asset
Corporation, a full service real estate developer based in
Charlotte, North Carolina. From June 1990 until February 1995,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Commercial Lending for
BB&T Corporation in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Nicola Rossi, 42, has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer since our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. Rossi was Vice President and Controller of
Cendants Hotel Group from June 2004 until our separation
from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2002 to June 2004,
Mr. Rossi served as Vice President, Corporate Finance for
Cendant. From April 2000 to April 2002, Mr. Rossi was
Corporate Controller of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., a bath and
plumbing products company, and was Assistant Corporate
Controller from June 1999 to March 2000.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
Code of
Ethics.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Corporate
Governance.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Governance of the
Company and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Certifications.
We have filed as exhibits to this report the certifications
required by
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We submitted the CEO certification to the NYSE pursuant to NYSE
Rule 303A.12(a) following the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Executive Compensation
and Committees of the Board and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
73
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Ownership of Company
Stock and is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Related Party
Transactions and Governance of the Company and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Disclosure About Fees
and Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
ITEM 15(A)(1)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See Financial Statements and Financial Statements Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
See Exhibit Index commencing on
page G-1
hereof.
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this report,
please be advised that the agreements are included to provide
you with information regarding their terms and are not intended
to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us
or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements generally
contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to
the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties
have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to
the applicable agreement and:
|
|
|
|
|
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements
of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of
the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
|
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors;
|
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable
agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in
the agreement; and
|
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or
such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement
and are subject to more recent developments
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time. Additional information about us may
be found elsewhere in this report and our other public filings,
which are available without charge through the SECs
website at
http://www.sec.gov
.
74
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
|
Stephen P. Holmes
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 26, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/
STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
Stephen
P. Holmes
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
VIRGINIA
M. WILSON
Virginia
M. Wilson
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
NICOLA
ROSSI
Nicola
Rossi
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
MYRA
J. BIBLOWIT
Myra
J. Biblowit
|
|
Director
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
JAMES
E. BUCKMAN
James
E. Buckman
|
|
Director
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
GEORGE
HERRERA
George
Herrera
|
|
Director
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
THE
RIGHT HONOURABLE
BRIAN MULRONEY
The
Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
|
|
Director
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
PAULINE
D.E. RICHARDS
Pauline
D.E. Richards
|
|
Director
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
MICHAEL
H. WARGOTZ
Michael
H. Wargotz
|
|
Director
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
75
INDEX TO
ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation
Parsippany, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
the related consolidated and combined statements of operations,
stockholders/invested equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. We
also have audited the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission. The Companys management is
responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements and an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated and combined financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Prior to its separation from Cendant Corporation
(Cendant; known as Avis Budget Group since
August 29, 2006), the Company was comprised of the assets
and liabilities used in managing and operating the lodging,
vacation exchange and rentals and vacation ownership businesses
of Cendant. Included in Notes 22 and 23 to the consolidated
and combined financial statements is a summary of transactions
with related parties. As discussed in Note 23 to the
consolidated and combined financial statements, in connection
with its separation from Cendant, the Company entered into
certain guarantee commitments with Cendant and has recorded the
fair value of these guarantees as of July 31, 2006. As
discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated and combined
financial statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 on January 1, 2007. Also, as
discussed in Notes 2 and 14 to the consolidated and
combined financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, on January 1, 2008, except as it applies to
those nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities as noted
in FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 157-2,
which was issued on February 12, 2008.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 26, 2009
F-2
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership interest sales
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
|
$
|
1,461
|
|
Service fees and membership
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
Franchise fees
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
Consumer financing
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Other
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
Cost of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Consumer financing interest
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Marketing and reservation
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Goodwill and other impairments
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Interest income (including intercompany of $0, $0 and $24)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-3
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Due from former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
Trademarks, net
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
Franchise agreements and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,573
|
|
|
$
|
10,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,231
|
|
|
|
6,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized
6,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
600,000,000 shares, issued 204,645,505 shares in 2008
and 203,874,101 shares in 2007
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
3,652
|
|
Retained earnings/(deficit)
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
525
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost27,284,823 shares in 2008 and
26,656,804 shares in 2007
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
9,573
|
|
|
$
|
10,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-4
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile income/(loss) before cumulative effect
of accounting change to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding the impact of
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
Net assets acquired, net of cash acquired, and
acquisition-related payments
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Net intercompany funding to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
Equity investments and development advances
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Proceeds from asset sales
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in securitization restricted cash
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in escrow deposit restricted cash
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitized borrowings
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
Principal payments on securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
|
(2,018
|
)
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
Proceeds from non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
Principal payments on non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
(1,937
|
)
|
Proceeds from bond issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
Dividend to shareholders
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
Capital contribution from former Parent
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-5
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENT OF
STOCKHOLDERS/INVESTED EQUITY
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Net Investment
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,925
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,033
|
|
Comprehensive income from January 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from January 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Assumption of former Parent corporate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Return of excess funding from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tax receivables due from former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred tax assets on contingent liabilities and guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Guarantees under FIN 45 related to the Separation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Contingent liabilitiesdue to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Cash transfer to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
Elimination of asset-linked facility obligation by former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Capital contribution from former Parent-proceeds from Travelport
sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Elimination of intercompany balance due to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
Transfer of net investment to additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
(3,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from August 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from August 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Additional capital contribution from former Parent-proceeds from
Travelport sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Adjustments to contingent liabilities due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
Equitable adjustment of stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Adjustment to deferred tax assets assumed from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Excess deferred tax assets from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Cumulative effect, adoption of FASB Interpretation
No. 48Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Cash transfer from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Tax adjustment from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax benefit of $0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash transfer from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,690
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(578
|
)
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(870
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-6
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions,
except per share amounts)
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation is a global provider of
hospitality products and services. The accompanying Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements include the accounts and
transactions of Wyndham, as well as the entities in which
Wyndham directly or indirectly has a controlling financial
interest. The accompanying Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
in the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
The Companys consolidated and combined results of
operations, financial position and cash flows may not be
indicative of its future performance and do not necessarily
reflect what its consolidated results of operations, financial
position and cash flows would have been had the Company operated
as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented
prior to August 1, 2006, including changes in its
operations and capitalization as a result of the Separation and
distribution from Cendant.
Certain corporate and general and administrative expenses,
including those related to executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, legal and treasury services, certain
employee benefits and real estate usage for common space were
allocated by Cendant to the Company through July 31, 2006
based on forecasted revenues or usage. Management believes such
allocations were reasonable. However, the associated expenses
recorded by the Company in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations may not be indicative of the actual
expenses that would have been incurred had the Company been
operating as a separate, stand-alone public company for the
periods presented prior to August 1, 2006. Following the
Separation and distribution from Cendant, the Company began
performing these functions using internal resources or purchased
services, certain of which have been provided by Cendant or one
of the separated companies during a transitional period pursuant
to the Transition Services Agreement. Refer to
Note 23Related Party Transactions for a detailed
description of the Companys transactions with Cendant and
its former subsidiaries.
In presenting the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported and related disclosures. Estimates,
by their nature, are based on judgment and available
information. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those
estimates. In managements opinion, the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements contain all normal recurring
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of annual results
reported.
The Company applies the equity method of accounting when it has
the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies of an investee in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 18,
The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock. The Company recorded $6 million of net
earnings and $1 million of net losses from such investments
during 2008 and 2007, respectively, in other income, net on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, during 2008,
the Company recorded $5 million of income primarily
associated with the assumption of a lodging-related credit card
marketing program obligation by a third-party and the sale of a
non-strategic asset by the Companys lodging business.
During 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of
$8 million related to the sale of certain vacation
ownership properties and related assets that were no longer
consistent with the Companys development plans. Such
amounts were recorded within other income, net on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Business
Description
The Company operates in the following business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
franchises hotels in the upscale,
midscale, economy and extended stay segments of the lodging
industry and provides property management services to owners of
the Companys luxury, upscale and midscale hotels.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
provides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and markets
vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of independent
owners.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Ownership
develops, markets and
sells VOIs to individual consumers, provides consumer financing
in connection with the sale of VOIs and provides property
management services at resorts.
|
F-7
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
In connection with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46), when evaluating an entity for
consolidation, the Company first determines whether an entity is
within the scope of FIN 46 and if it is deemed to be a
variable interest entity (VIE). If the entity is
considered to be a VIE, the Company determines whether it would
be considered the entitys primary beneficiary. The Company
consolidates those VIEs for which it has determined that it is
the primary beneficiary. The Company will consolidate an entity
not deemed either a VIE or qualifying special purpose entity
(QSPE) upon a determination that its ownership,
direct or indirect, exceeds 50% of the outstanding voting shares
of an entity
and/or
that
it has the ability to control the financial or operating
policies through its voting rights, board representation or
other similar rights. For entities where the Company does not
have a controlling interest (financial or operating), the
investments in such entities are classified as
available-for-sale securities or accounted for using the equity
or cost method, as appropriate.
Revenue
Recognition
Lodging
The Company enters into agreements to franchise its lodging
franchise systems to independent hotel owners. The
Companys standard franchise agreement typically has a term
of 15 to 20 years and provides a franchisee with certain
rights to terminate the franchise agreement before the term of
the agreement under certain circumstances. The principal source
of revenues from franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to
marketing and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees
typically are based on a percentage of gross room revenues of
each franchised hotel and are accrued as earned and upon
becoming due from the franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible
ongoing franchise fees is charged to bad debt expense and
included in operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. Lodging revenues also include initial
franchise fees, which are recognized as revenue when all
material services or conditions have been substantially
performed, which is either when a franchised hotel opens for
business or when a franchise agreement is terminated as it has
been determined that the franchised hotel will not open.
The Companys franchise agreements also require the payment
of fees for certain services, including marketing and
reservations. With such fees, the Company provides its
franchised properties with a suite of operational and
administrative services, including access to (i) an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservations system,
(ii) advertising, (iii) promotional and co-marketing
programs, (iv) referrals, (v) technology,
(vi) training and (vii) volume purchasing. The Company
is contractually obligated to expend the marketing and
reservation fees it collects from franchisees in accordance with
the franchise agreements; as such, revenues earned in excess of
costs incurred are accrued as a liability for future marketing
or reservation costs. Costs incurred in excess of revenues are
expensed as incurred. In accordance with its franchise
agreements, the Company includes an allocation of costs required
to carry out marketing and reservation activities within
marketing and reservation expenses.
The Company also provides property management services for
hotels under management contracts. The Companys standard
management agreement typically has a term of up to
20 years. The Companys management fees are comprised
of base fees, which are typically calculated based upon a
specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations,
and incentive fees, which are typically calculated based upon a
specified percentage of a hotels gross operating profit.
Management fee revenue is recognized when earned in accordance
with the terms of the contract. The Company incurs certain
reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel properties and
reports reimbursements received from managed properties as
revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses.
Management fee revenues are recorded as a component of franchise
fee revenues and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The costs,
which principally relate to payroll costs for operational
employees who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. The reimbursements from hotel owners
are based upon the costs incurred with no added margin; as a
result, these reimbursable costs have little to no effect on the
Companys operating income. Management fee revenue and
revenue related to payroll reimbursements were $5 million
and $100 million, respectively, during 2008,
$6 million and $92 million, respectively, during 2007
and $4 million and $69 million, respectively, during
2006.
The Company also earns revenue from administering its Wyndham
Rewards loyalty program. The Company charges its
franchisee/managed property owner a fee based upon a percentage
of room revenue generated from member stays at participating
hotels. This fee is accrued as earned and upon becoming due from
the franchisee.
F-8
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, the Company enters
into affiliation agreements with developers of vacation
ownership properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for some members, for other
leisure-related products and services. Additionally, as a
marketer of vacation rental properties, generally the Company
enters into contracts for exclusive periods of time with
property owners to market the rental of such properties to
rental customers. The Companys vacation exchange business
derives a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues
and exchange fees from members trading their intervals. Annual
dues revenue represents the annual membership fees from members
who participate in the Companys vacation exchange business
and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. The Company records
revenue from annual membership dues as deferred income on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognizes it on a straight-line
basis over the membership period during which delivery of
publications, if applicable, and other services are provided to
the members. Exchange fees are generated when members exchange
their intervals for equivalent values of rights and services,
which may include intervals at other properties within the
Companys vacation exchange business or other
leisure-related products and services. Exchange fees are
recognized as revenue, net of expected cancellations, when the
exchange requests have been confirmed to the member. The
Companys vacation rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees, which generally average between 20% and 45%
of the gross booking fees for non-proprietary inventory, as
compared to properties that it owns or operates under long-term
capital leases where it receives 100% of the revenue. The
majority of the time, the Company acts on behalf of the owners
of the rental properties to generate the Companys fees.
The Company provides reservation services to the independent
property owners and receives the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. The Company remits the gross
rental fee received from the renter to the independent property
owner, net of the Companys
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2008,
2007 and 2006 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions
booked. The Companys revenue is earned when evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have
been rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
Company also earns rental fees in connection with properties it
owns or operates under long-term capital leases and such fees
are recognized when the rental customers stay occurs, as
this is the point at which the service is rendered.
Vacation
Ownership
The Company develops, markets and sells VOIs to individual
consumers, provides property management services at resorts and
provides consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs.
The Companys vacation ownership business derives the
majority of its revenues from sales of VOIs and derives other
revenues from consumer financing and property management. The
Companys sales of VOIs are either cash sales or
Company-financed sales. In order for the Company to recognize
revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method of
accounting described in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 66 Accounting of
Sales of Real Estate for fully constructed inventory, a
binding sales contract must have been executed, the statutory
rescission period must have expired (after which time the
purchasers are not entitled to a refund except for non-delivery
by the Company), receivables must have been deemed collectible
and the remainder of the Companys obligations must have
been substantially completed. In addition, before the Company
recognizes any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by the Company. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152, Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions
(SFAS No. 152) and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SOP 04-2)
on January 1, 2006, the Company must also take into
consideration the fair value of certain incentives provided to
the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by the Company, the
purchaser is obligated to remit monthly payments under financing
contracts that represent the purchasers continuing
investment. The contractual terms of Company-provided financing
agreements require that the contractual level of annual
principal payments be sufficient to amortize the loan over a
customary period for the VOI being financed, which is generally
ten years, and payments under the financing contracts begin
within 45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum down
payment of 10%. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify
under the full accrual method of accounting have been met, as
discussed above, except that construction of the VOI purchased
is not complete, the Company recognizes revenues using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting provided that the
preliminary construction phase is complete and that a minimum
sales level has been met (to assure that the property will not
revert to a rental property). The preliminary stage of
development is deemed to be complete when the engineering and
design work is complete, the construction contracts have been
executed, the site has been cleared, prepared and excavated, and
the building foundation is complete. The completion percentage
is determined
F-9
by the proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to
total estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon
historical experience and the related contractual terms. The
remaining revenue and related costs of sales, including
commissions and direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as
the remaining costs are incurred.
The Company also offers consumer financing as an option to
customers purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by
the underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for ten
years. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is recorded at the
time of the sale with a charge to the provision for loan losses
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. Upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The
interest income earned from the financing arrangements is earned
on the principal balance outstanding over the life of the
arrangement and is recorded within consumer financing on the
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations.
The Company also provides day-to-day-management services,
including oversight of housekeeping services, maintenance and
certain accounting and administrative services for property
owners associations and clubs. In some cases, the
Companys employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Operations. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll
costs for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where the Company is the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. Reimbursements are based upon the
costs incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of
these reimbursable costs has little to no effect on the
Companys operating income. Management fee revenue and
revenue related to reimbursements were $159 million and
$187 million, respectively, during 2008, $146 million
and $164 million, respectively, during 2007 and
$112 million and $141 million, respectively, during
2006. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, one of the associations that
the Company manages paid Group RCI $17 million,
$15 million and $13 million, respectively, for
exchange services.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, gross sales of VOIs were reduced by
$75 million, $22 million and $22 million,
respectively, representing the net change in revenue that is
deferred under the percentage of completion method of
accounting. Under the percentage of completion method of
accounting, a portion of the total revenue from a vacation
ownership contract sale is not recognized if the construction of
the vacation resort has not yet been fully completed. Such
revenue will be recognized in future periods in proportion to
the costs incurred as compared to the total expected costs for
completion of construction of the vacation resort.
The Company records lodging-related marketing and reservation
revenues, Wyndham Rewards revenues, as well as property
management services revenues for the Companys Lodging and
Vacation Ownership segments, in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
Income
Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities using
the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets
and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary
differences between the financial statement and income tax bases
of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates.
These differences are based upon estimated differences between
the book and tax basis of the assets and liabilities for the
Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
The Companys deferred tax assets are recorded net of a
valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future
periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as
reductions to the Companys provision for income taxes and
increases to the valuation allowance result in additional
provision for income taxes. However, if the valuation allowance
is adjusted in connection with an acquisition, such adjustment
is recorded through goodwill rather than the provision for
income taxes. The realization of the Companys deferred tax
assets, net of the valuation allowance, is primarily dependent
on estimated future taxable income. A change in the
Companys estimate of future taxable income may require an
addition to or reduction from the valuation allowance.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly-liquid investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
F-10
Restricted
Cash
The largest portion of the Companys restricted cash
relates to securitizations. The remaining portion is comprised
of cash held in escrow related to the Companys vacation
ownership business and cash held in all other escrow accounts.
Securitizations: In accordance with the contractual requirements
of the Companys various vacation ownership contract
receivable securitizations, a dedicated lockbox account, subject
to a blocked control agreement, is established for each
securitization. At each month end, the total cash in the
collection account from the previous month is analyzed and a
monthly servicer report is prepared by the Company, which
details how much cash should be remitted to the noteholders for
principal and interest payments, and any cash remaining is
transferred by the trustee back to the Company. Additionally, as
required by various securitizations, the Company holds an
agreed-upon
percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal balances of
the VOI contract receivables collateralizing the asset-backed
notes in a segregated trust (or reserve) account as credit
enhancement. Each time a securitization closes and the Company
receives cash from the noteholders, a portion of the cash is
deposited in the reserve account. Such amounts were
$155 million and $125 million as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively, of which $80 million is
recorded within other current assets as of December 31,
2008 and $75 million and $125 million are recorded
within other non-current assets as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Escrow Deposits: Laws in most U.S. states require the
escrow of down payments on VOI sales, with the typical
requirement mandating that the funds be held in escrow until the
rescission period expires. As sales transactions are
consummated, down payments are collected and are subsequently
placed in escrow until the rescission period has expired.
Depending on the state, the rescission period can be as short as
three calendar days or as long as 15 calendar days. In certain
states, the escrow laws require that 100% of VOI purchaser funds
(excluding interest payments, if any), be held in escrow until
the deeding process is complete. Where possible, the Company
utilizes surety bonds in lieu of escrow deposits. Escrow deposit
amounts were $30 million and $66 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, of which
$28 million and $66 million are recorded within other
current assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $2 million is recorded within other
non-current assets as of December 31, 2008 on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Receivable
Valuation
Trade
receivables
The Company provides for estimated bad debts based on their
assessment of the ultimate realizability of receivables,
considering historical collection experience, the economic
environment and specific customer information. When the Company
determines that an account is not collectible, the account is
written-off to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
following table illustrates the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts activity during 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Translation and other adjustments
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
ownership contract receivables
Within the Companys vacation ownership business, the
Company provides for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations and defaults at the time the VOI sales
are recorded, by reducing VOI sales with a charge to the
provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. Upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The
Company assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses
based on the historical performance of similar vacation
ownership contract receivables. The Company uses a technique
referred to as static pool analysis, which tracks defaults for
each years sales over the entire life of those contract
receivables. The Company considers current defaults, past due
aging, historical write-offs of contracts, consumer credit
scores (FICO scores) in the assessment of borrowers credit
strength and expected loan performance. The Company also
considers whether the historical economic conditions are
comparable to current economic conditions. If current conditions
differ from the conditions in effect when the historical
experience was generated, the Company adjusts the allowance for
loan losses to reflect
F-11
the expected effects of the current environment on
uncollectibility. The Company charges vacation ownership
contract receivables to the loan loss allowance when they become
91, 120 or 150 days contractually past due depending on the
percentage of the contract price already paid or are deemed
uncollectible.
Loyalty
Programs
The Company operates a number of loyalty programs including
Wyndham Rewards, RCI Elite Rewards and other programs. Wyndham
Rewards members primarily accumulate points by staying in hotels
franchised under one of the Companys lodging brands.
Wyndham Rewards and RCI Elite Rewards members accumulate points
by purchasing everyday products and services from the various
businesses that participate in the program.
Members may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, rental cars, resort vacations, electronics, sporting
goods, movie and theme park tickets, gift certificates, vacation
ownership maintenance fees and annual membership dues and
exchange fees for transactions. The points cannot be redeemed
for cash. The Company earns revenue from these programs
(i) when a member stays at a participating hotel, from a
fee charged by the Company to the franchisee, which is based
upon a percentage of room revenue generated from such stay or
(ii) based upon a percentage of the members spending
on the credit cards and such revenue is paid to the Company by a
third-party issuing bank. The Company also incurs costs to
support these programs, which primarily relate to marketing
expenses to promote the programs, costs to administer the
programs and costs of members redemptions.
As members earn points through the Companys loyalty
programs, the Company records a liability of the estimated
future redemption costs, which is calculated based on (i) a
cost per point and (ii) an estimated redemption rate of the
overall points earned, which is determined through historical
experience, current trends and the use of an actuarial analysis.
Revenues relating to the Companys loyalty programs are
recorded in other revenue in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations and amounted to $94 million,
$87 million and $73 million while total expenses
amounted to $81 million, $71 million and
$59 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
points liability as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted
to $50 million and $48 million, respectively, and is
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and
other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of real estate and development
costs of completed VOIs, VOIs under construction, land held for
future VOI development, vacation ownership properties and
vacation credits. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost,
including capitalized interest, property taxes and certain other
carrying costs incurred during the construction process, or net
realizable value. Capitalized interest was $19 million,
$23 million and $16 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Advertising
Expense
Advertising costs are generally expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising expenses, recorded primarily within marketing and
reservation expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Operations, were $108 million, $111 million and
$90 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Use
of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities in the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Although
these estimates and assumptions are based on the Companys
knowledge of current events and actions the Company may
undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ
from estimates and assumptions.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall
strategy to manage its exposure to market risks primarily
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates. As a matter of policy, the Company does not
use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. All
derivatives are recorded at fair value either as assets or
liabilities. Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments and of derivatives designated as fair
value hedging instruments are recognized currently in earnings
and included either as a component of other revenues or interest
expense, based upon the nature of the hedged item, in the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The
effective portion of changes in fair value of derivatives
designated as cash flow hedging instruments is recorded as a
component of other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion
is reported currently in earnings as a component of revenues or
net interest expense, based upon the nature of the
F-12
hedged item. Amounts included in other comprehensive income are
reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the
hedged item affects earnings.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment (including leasehold improvements) are
recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation, recorded as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations, is computed utilizing the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
related assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements, also
recorded as a component of depreciation and amortization, is
computed utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated
benefit period of the related assets or the lease term, if
shorter. Useful lives are generally 30 years for buildings,
up to 15 years for leasehold improvements, from 20 to
30 years for vacation rental properties and from three to
seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for
internal use in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Capitalization of software
developed for internal use commences during the development
phase of the project. The Company amortizes software developed
or obtained for internal use on a straight-line basis, from
three to five years, commencing when such software is
substantially ready for use. The net carrying value of software
developed or obtained for internal use was $130 million and
$99 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company has goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible
assets recorded in connection with business combinations. The
Company annually (during the fourth quarter of each year
subsequent to completing the Companys annual forecasting
process) or, more frequently if circumstances indicate
impairment may have occurred that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount, review their carrying values as required by
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142). The Company evaluates
goodwill for impairment using the two-step process prescribed in
SFAS No. 142. The first step is to compare the
estimated fair value of any reporting units within the company
that have recorded goodwill with the recorded net book value
(including the goodwill) of the reporting unit. If the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit is higher than the recorded net
book value, no impairment is deemed to exist and no further
testing is required. If, however, the estimated fair value of
the reporting unit is below the recorded net book value, then a
second step must be performed to determine the goodwill
impairment required, if any. In this second step, the estimated
fair value from the first step is used as the purchase price in
a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. Purchase
business combination accounting rules are followed to determine
a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the reporting
units assets and liabilities. The residual amount of
goodwill that results from this hypothetical purchase price
allocation is compared to the recorded amount of goodwill for
the reporting unit, and the recorded amount is written down to
the hypothetical amount, if lower. In accordance with
SFAS 142, the Company has determined that its reporting
units are the same as its reportable segments.
The Company has three reporting units, all of which contained
goodwill prior to the annual goodwill impairment test. See
Note 5Intangible Assets and
Note 21Restructuring and Impairments for information
regarding the goodwill impairment recorded as a result of the
annual impairment test. Following such goodwill impairment, in
which the Company impaired the goodwill of its vacation
ownership reporting unit to $0, the Company had
$297 million of goodwill at its lodging reporting unit and
$1,056 million of goodwill at its vacation exchange and
rentals reporting unit.
Accounting
for Restructuring Activities
The Company has committed and may continue to commit to
restructuring actions and activities associated with strategic
realignment initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs,
enhancing organizational efficiency and consolidating and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities, which are
accounted for under SFAS No. 112,
Employers Accounting for Post Employment
Benefits and SFAS No. 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The
Companys restructuring actions require it to make
significant estimates in several areas including:
(i) expenses for severance and related benefit costs;
(ii) the ability to generate sublease income, as well as
its ability to terminate lease obligations; and
(iii) contract terminations. The amounts that the Company
has accrued at December 31, 2008 represent its best
estimate of the obligations that it expects to incur in
connection with these actions, but could be subject to change
due to various factors including market conditions and the
outcome of negotiations with third parties. Should the actual
amounts differ from the Companys estimates, the amount of
the restructuring charges could be materially impacted.
F-13
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of
accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments,
accumulated unrealized gains and losses on derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges and pension related
costs. Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income
taxes related to indefinite investments in foreign subsidiaries.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries having
non-U.S.-dollar
functional currencies are translated at exchange rates at the
Consolidated Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are
translated at average exchange rates during the periods
presented. The gains or losses resulting from translating
foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars,
net of hedging gains or losses and taxes, are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency
transactions are included in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)), the Company measures
all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value
method and records the related expense in its Consolidated and
Combined Statement of Operations. The Company uses the modified
prospective transition method, which requires that compensation
cost be recognized in the financial statements for all awards
granted after the date of adoption as well as for existing
awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered as
of the date of adoption and requires that prior periods not be
restated. Because the Company was allocated stock-based
compensation expense for all outstanding employee stock awards
prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the adoption
of such standard did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations.
Paragraph 81 of SFAS No. 123(R) requires an
entity to calculate the pool of excess tax benefits available to
absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to adopting
SFAS No. 123(R) (APIC Pool). Utilizing the
calculation method described in FSP
No. 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects
of Share-Based Payment Awards
, the Company calculated its
APIC Pool as of January 1, 2006 associated with stock
options that were fully vested as of December 31, 2005. The
impact on the APIC Pool for stock options that are partially
vested at, or granted subsequent to, December 31, 2005 is
being determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R).
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved the full vesting of all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) on August 15, 2006. As a result of
the acceleration of the vesting of these awards, the Company
recorded non-cash compensation expense of $45 million
during the third quarter of 2006. In connection with the
acceleration of the equity awards, an APIC Pool detriment of
$9 million was created as the tax deduction of the equity
awards was lower than the deferred tax asset recognized. As of
January 1, 2006, the Company had no APIC Pool. During 2006,
the Company created an APIC Pool of approximately
$2 million through other vesting activities. As a result of
the write off of the $9 million excess deferred tax asset,
the Company recorded a tax provision of $7 million on its
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations during the
year ended December 31, 2006 and a reduction to additional
paid-in capital of $2 million on its Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 2006. During 2008 and 2007, the
Companys APIC Pool decreased by $3 million and
increased by $7 million, respectively, due to the exercise
and vesting of equity awards. As a result of such activity, the
Company recorded a corresponding decrease to additional paid-in
capital of $3 million and an increase to additional paid-in
capital of $7 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007. As of December 31, 2008
and 2007, the Company had an APIC Pool balance of
$4 million and $7 million, respectively, on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements.
In September 2006, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 explains the definition of fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157
clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset
or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.
In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
(FSP)
157-2,
Effective Date of Statement No. 157 which
deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008, as required, for
financial assets and financial liabilities. There was no
material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements resulting from the adoption. See
Note 14Fair Value for a further explanation of the
adoption.
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities.
In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an
amendment of
F-14
FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at
fair value. It also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types
of assets and liabilities. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, as required, but
elected not to remeasure any assets. Therefore, there was no
impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements
resulting from the adoption.
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110.
In December
2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 110 (SAB 110). SAB 110 expresses
the views of the SEC regarding the use of a
simplified method, as discussed in SAB 107,
Share-Based Payment, in developing an estimate of
the expected term of plain vanilla share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). As permitted by
SAB 110, the Company will continue to use the simplified
method as the Company does not have sufficient historical data
to estimate the expected term of its share-based awards.
Business Combinations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)), replacing
SFAS No. 141. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree.
SFAS No. 141(R) also provides guidance for recognizing
and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination
and determines what information to disclose to enable users of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. This Statement applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company
believes the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will not have
a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51.
In December
2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. In addition to the
amendments to ARB No. 51, SFAS No. 160 amends
SFAS No. 128; such that earnings per share data will
continue to be calculated the same way that such data were
calculated before this Statement was issued.
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. The Company believes the adoption of
SFAS No. 160 will not have a material impact on its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activitiesan amendment of SFAS No. 133.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities-an amendment of SFAS No. 133
(SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161
requires specific disclosures regarding the location and amounts
of derivative instruments in the Companys financial
statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect the Companys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods after
November 15, 2008. The Company believes the adoption of
SFAS No. 161 will not have a material impact on its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) is based on the Companys net
income/(loss) (and other comparable earnings measures) divided
by the basic weighted average number of common shares and
diluted weighted average number of common shares, respectively.
F-15
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted EPS (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings/(losses) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(losses) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computations of diluted net income/(loss) per common share
available to common stockholders for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 do not include
approximately 13 million, 10 million and
16 million stock options and stock-settled stock
appreciation rights (SSARs), respectively, as the
effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive to
earnings/(losses) per share.
Dividend
Payments
During each of the quarterly periods ended March 31,
June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2008, the
Company paid cash dividends of $0.04 per share ($28 million
in the aggregate). During each of the quarterly periods ended
September 30 and December 31, 2007, the Company paid cash
dividends of $0.04 per share ($14 million in the aggregate).
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations
were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the
respective acquisition dates based upon their estimated fair
values at such dates. The results of operations of businesses
acquired by the Company have been included in the Consolidated
and Combined Statements of Operations since their respective
dates of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair values of the underlying assets acquired and
liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. In certain
circumstances, the allocations of the excess purchase price are
based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly,
the allocations may be subject to revision when the Company
receives final information, including appraisals and other
analyses. Any revisions to the fair values during the allocation
period, which may be significant, will be recorded by the
Company as further adjustments to the purchase price
allocations. Although the Company has substantially integrated
the operations of its acquired businesses, additional future
costs relating to such integration may occur. These costs may
result from integrating operating systems, relocating employees,
closing facilities, reducing duplicative efforts and exiting and
consolidating other activities. These costs will be recorded on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets as adjustments to the purchase
price or on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Operations as expenses, as appropriate.
2008
Acquisitions
U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc.
On July 18, 2008,
the Company completed the acquisition of U.S. Franchise
Systems, Inc., which included its Microtel Inns &
Suites (Microtel) hotel brand, a chain of economy
hotels, and Hawthorn Suites (Hawthorn) hotel brand,
a chain of extended-stay hotels, from a subsidiary of Global
Hyatt Corporation (collectively USFS). Management
believes that this acquisition solidifies the Companys
presence in
F-16
the economy lodging segment and represents the Companys
entry into the all-suites, extended stay market. The preliminary
allocation of the purchase price is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
Transaction costs and expenses
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
135
|
|
Less: Historical value of assets acquired in excess of
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
57
|
|
Less: Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price over fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
connection with the Companys acquisition of USFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
Trademarks
(a)
|
|
|
83
|
|
Franchise
agreements
(b)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Non-current deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents indefinite-lived
Microtel and Hawthorn trademarks.
|
(b)
|
|
Represents franchise agreements
with a weighted average life of 20 years.
|
The goodwill, none of which is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes, was assigned to the Companys Lodging segment.
This acquisition was not significant to the Companys
results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
2007
Acquisitions
During 2007, the Company acquired four individually
non-significant businesses for aggregate consideration of
$15 million in cash, net of cash acquired of
$5 million. The goodwill resulting from the allocation of
the purchase prices of these acquisitions aggregated
$5 million, all of which is expected to be deductible for
tax purposes. The goodwill was allocated to the Vacation
Ownership segment. These acquisitions also resulted in
$14 million of other intangible assets.
2006
Acquisitions
Baymont.
On April 7, 2006, the Company completed the
acquisition of the Baymont Inn & Suites brand
(Baymont), a system of 115 independently-owned
franchised properties, for approximately $60 million in
cash. The purchase price resulted in the recognition of
$47 million of trademarks and $14 million of franchise
agreements, both of which were assigned to the Companys
Lodging segment. Management believes this acquisition solidifies
the Companys presence in the growing midscale lodging
segment.
Other.
On July 20, 2006, the Company acquired a
vacation ownership and resort management business for aggregate
consideration of $43 million in cash. The goodwill
resulting from the allocation of the purchase price for this
acquisition aggregated $34 million, none of which is
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was
allocated to the Companys Vacation Ownership segment. This
acquisition also resulted in $12 million of other
amortizable intangible assets (primarily customer lists).
F-17
Intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Unamortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
(a)
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
agreements
(b)
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
Trademarks
(c)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(d)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Comprised of various trade names
(including the worldwide Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada,
Days Inn, RCI, Landal GreenParks, Baymont Inn &
Suites, Microtel and Hawthorn trade names) that the Company has
acquired and which distinguishes the Companys consumer
services. These trade names are expected to generate future cash
flows for an indefinite period of time.
|
(b)
|
|
Generally amortized over a period
ranging from 20 to 40 years with a weighted average life of
33 years.
|
(c)
|
|
Comprised of definite-lived
trademarks, which will be fully amortized and written-off by
March 31, 2009.
|
(d)
|
|
Includes customer lists and
business contracts, generally amortized over a period ranging
from 5 to 20 years with a weighted average life of
16 years.
|
Goodwill
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company tests
goodwill for potential impairment annually (during the fourth
quarter of each year subsequent to completing the Companys
annual forecasting process) and between annual tests if an event
occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount.
The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the
determination of the fair value of the Companys reporting
units as described in Note 2Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies. Because quoted market prices for the
Companys reporting units are not available, management
must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of
these reporting units for purposes of performing the annual
goodwill impairment test. Management uses all available
information to make these fair value determinations, including
the present values of expected future cash flows using discount
rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets.
Inherent in such fair value determinations are certain judgments
and estimates relating to future cash flows, including the
Companys interpretation of current economic indicators and
market valuations, and assumptions about the Companys
strategic plans with regard to its operations. Due to the
uncertainties associated with such estimates, actual results
could differ from such estimates. In performing its impairment
analysis, the Company developed the estimated fair values for
its reporting units using a combination of the discounted cash
flow methodology and the market multiple methodology.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by
estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows
to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate
applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the
present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and
the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future
cash flows. The discounted cash flow methodology uses the
Companys projections of financial performance for a
five-year period. The most significant assumptions used in the
discounted cash flow methodology are the discount rate, the
terminal value and expected future revenues, gross margins and
operating margins, which vary among reporting units.
The Company uses a market multiple methodology to estimate the
terminal value of each reporting unit by comparing such
reporting unit to other publicly traded companies that are
similar to it from an operational and economic standpoint. The
market multiple methodology compares each reporting unit to the
comparable companies on the basis of risk characteristics in
order to determine the risk profile relative to the comparable
companies as a group. This analysis generally focuses on
quantitative considerations, which include financial performance
and other quantifiable data, and qualitative considerations,
which include any factors which are expected to impact future
financial performance. The most significant assumption affecting
the Companys estimate of the terminal value of each
reporting unit is the multiple of the enterprise value to
earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
To support the Companys estimate of the individual
reporting unit fair values, a comparison is performed between
the sum of the fair values of the reporting units and the
Companys market capitalization. The Company uses an
average of its market capitalization over a reasonable period
preceding the impairment testing date as being
F-18
more reflective of the Companys stock price trend than a
single day,
point-in-time
market price. The difference is an implied control premium,
which represents the acknowledgment that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock may not be
representative of the fair value of the company as a whole.
Estimates of a companys control premium are highly
judgmental and depend on capital market and macro-economic
conditions overall. The Company concluded that the implied
control premium estimated from its analysis is reasonable.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, after estimating the fair
values of the Companys three reporting units as of
December 31, 2008, the Company determined that its lodging
and vacation exchange and rentals reporting units passed the
first step of the goodwill impairment test, while the vacation
ownership reporting unit did not pass the first step. The
lodging and vacation exchange and rentals reporting units had
goodwill balances of $297 million and $1,056 million,
respectively at December 31, 2008.
As described in Note 2Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, the second step of the goodwill impairment
test uses the estimated fair value of the Companys
vacation ownership segment from the first step as the purchase
price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. The
significant hypothetical purchase price allocation adjustments
made to the assets and liabilities of the vacation ownership
segment in this second step calculation were in the areas of:
(1) Adjusting the carrying value of Vacation Ownership
Contract Receivables to their estimated fair values,
(2) Adjusting the carrying value of customer related
intangible assets to their estimated fair values,
(3) Adjusting the carrying value of debt to the estimate
fair value, and
(4) Recalculating deferred income taxes under Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, after considering the
likely tax basis a hypothetical buyer would have in the assets
and liabilities.
As a result of the above analysis, during the fourth quarter of
2008 the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
$1,342 million ($1,337 million, after-tax)
representing a write-off of the entire amount of the vacation
ownership reporting units previously recorded goodwill.
Such impairment was a result of plans that the Company announced
during (i) October 2008, in which it refocused its vacation
ownership sales and marketing efforts on consumers with higher
credit quality beginning the fourth quarter of 2008, which
reduced future revenue and growth rates, and (ii) December
2008, in which it decided to eliminate the vacation ownership
reporting units reliance of the asset-backed securities
market by reducing its VOI sales pace during 2009 by
approximately 40% from 2008 to approximately $1.2 billion.
Other
Intangible Assets
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded charges
of (i) a $16 million non-cash impairment charge
primarily due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards and (ii) $8 million to impair the
value of an unamortized trademark due to a strategic change in
direction and reduced future investments in a vacation rentals
business. See Note 21Restructuring and Impairments
for more information.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $31 million
of unamortized vacation ownership trademarks recorded on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet, including its FairShare Plus and
WorldMark trademarks. During the first quarter of 2008, the
Company recorded a $28 million impairment charge due to the
Companys initiative to rebrand FairShare Plus and
WorldMark to the Wyndham brand. The remaining $3 million
was reclassified to amortized trademarks and was $1 million
at December 31, 2008. Such amount will be fully amortized
and written-off by March 31, 2009.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company announced that it
would change its Fairfield Resorts and Trendwest branding to
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively.
As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$11 million at its vacation ownership business relating to
the rebranding initiatives. A valuation analysis was performed
utilizing future cash flows of the underlying trademarks to
arrive at the trademarks fair value. The resulting
impairment charge was recorded during 2006 as a component of
separation and related costs within the Combined Statement of
Operations. In addition, the remaining trademark value of
$2 million was fully amortized and written-off during 2007.
F-19
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
to Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
during
|
|
|
during
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
(b)
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
2,723
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,342
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Relates to the acquisition of USFS
(see Note 4Acquisitions).
|
(b)
|
|
Primarily relates to foreign
currency translation adjustments.
|
Amortization expense relating to all intangible assets was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Franchise agreements
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
(*)
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Included as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations.
|
Based on the Companys amortizable intangible assets as of
December 31, 2008, the Company expects related amortization
expense over the next five years as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
2010
|
|
|
26
|
|
2011
|
|
|
25
|
|
2012
|
|
|
24
|
|
2013
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Franchising
and Marketing/Reservation Activities
|
Franchise fee revenue of $514 million, $523 million
and $501 million on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
includes initial franchise fees of $11 million,
$8 million and $7 million, respectively.
As part of ongoing franchise fees, the Company receives
marketing and reservation fees from its lodging franchisees,
which generally are calculated based on a specified percentage
of gross room revenues. Such fees totaled $218 million,
$227 million and $223 million during 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively, and are recorded within the franchise fees
line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Operations. As provided for in the franchise agreements, all of
these fees are to be expended for marketing purposes or the
operation of an international, centralized, brand-specific
reservation system for the respective franchisees. Additionally,
the Company is required to provide certain services to its
franchisees, including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing.
F-20
The number of lodging outlets in operation by market sector is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Upscale
(a)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Midscale
(b)
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
Economy
(c)
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
5,081
|
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
Unmanaged, Affiliated and Managed, Non-Proprietary
Hotels
(d)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Comprised of the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts lodging brand.
|
(b)
|
|
Comprised of the Wingate by
Wyndham, Hawthorn Suites (acquired July 18, 2008), Ramada
Worldwide, Howard Johnson Plaza, Howard Johnson Hotel, Baymont
Inn & Suites and AmeriHost Inn lodging brands.
|
(c)
|
|
Comprised of the Days Inn, Super 8,
Howard Johnson Inn, Howard Johnson Express, Travelodge, Microtel
(acquired July 18, 2008) and Knights Inn lodging
brands.
|
(d)
|
|
Represents properties affiliated
with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which the Company
receives a fee for reservation and/or other services provided
and properties managed under the CHI Limited joint venture.
These properties are not branded.
|
The number of lodging outlets changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
388
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
(b)
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Relates to Microtel and Hawthorn
lodging outlets, acquired on July 18, 2008.
|
(b)
|
|
Relates to Baymont Inn &
Suites lodging outlets, acquired on April 7, 2006.
|
The Company may, at its discretion, provide development advances
to certain of its franchisees or property owners in its managed
business in order to assist such franchisees/property owners in
converting to one of the Companys brands, building a new
hotel to be flagged under one of the Companys brands or in
assisting in other franchisee expansion efforts. Provided the
franchisee/property owner is in compliance with the terms of the
franchise/management agreement, all or a portion of the
development advance may be forgiven by the Company over the
period of the franchise/management agreement, which typically
ranges from 10 to 20 years. Otherwise, the related
principal is due and payable to the Company. In certain
instances, the Company may earn interest on unpaid franchisee
development advances, which was not significant during 2008,
2007 or 2006. The amount of such development advances recorded
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $53 million and
$42 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. These amounts are classified within the other
non-current assets line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded
$4 million, $3 million and $3 million,
respectively, related to the forgiveness of these advances. Such
amounts are recorded as a reduction of franchise fees on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.
The income tax provision consists of the following for the year
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
State
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
State
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Prior to the Separation, the Company was included in the Cendant
consolidated tax returns. The utilization of the Companys
net operating loss carryforwards by other Cendant companies is
reflected in the 2006 current provision.
Pre-tax income for domestic and foreign operations consisted of
the following for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(928
|
)
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and non-current deferred income tax assets and
liabilities, as of December 31, are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts and vacation ownership contract
receivables
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Valuation
allowance
(*)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Unamortized servicing rights
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Other
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Tax basis differences in assets of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Valuation
allowance
(*)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
The valuation allowance of
$85 million as of December 31, 2008 primarily relates
to foreign tax credits and state net operating loss
carryforwards. The valuation allowance will be reduced when and
if the Company determines that the deferred income tax assets
are more likely than not to be realized.
|
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $116 million, which
primarily expire in 2026 and 2027. No provision has been made
for U.S. federal deferred income taxes on $223 million
of accumulated and undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 since it is the
present intention of management to reinvest the undistributed
earnings indefinitely in those foreign operations. The
determination of the amount of unrecognized U.S. federal
deferred income tax liability for unremitted earnings is not
practicable.
F-22
The Companys effective income tax rate differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Taxes on foreign operations at rates different than U.S. federal
statutory rates
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
Taxes on repatriated foreign income, net of tax credits
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Release of guarantee liability related to income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
(52.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)%
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the 2008 effective tax rate is primarily due to
(i) the non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge
recorded during 2008, (ii) charges in a tax-free zone
resulting from currency conversion losses related to the
transfer of cash from the Companys Venezuelan operations
at its vacation exchange and rentals business and (iii) a
non-cash impairment charge related to the write-off of an
investment in a non-performing joint venture at the
Companys vacation exchange and rentals business. See
Note 5Intangible Assets and
Note 21Restructuring and Impairments for further
details.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. As a result the Company established a
liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $20 million,
which was accounted for as a reduction of retained earnings on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 1, 2007.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
8
|
|
Expiration of the statute of limitations for the assessment of
taxes
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
28
|
|
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
5
|
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statue of
limitations
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross amount of the unrecognized tax benefits at both
December 31, 2008 and 2007 that, if recognized, would
affect the Companys effective tax rate was
$25 million and $24 million, respectively. The Company
recorded both accrued interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits as a component of provision for income
taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to
January 1, 2007, accrued interest and penalties were
recorded as a component of operating expenses and interest
expense on the Combined Statement of Operations. The Company
also accrued potential penalties and interest of less than
$1 million and $1 million related to these
unrecognized tax benefits during 2008 and 2007, respectively. As
of both December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had
recorded a liability for potential penalties of $2 million
and interest of $3 million on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The Companys unrecognized tax benefits were offset
by $4 million of net operating loss carryforwards as of
December 31, 2007. The Company does not expect the
unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next
12 months.
The Company files U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in
jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2006
through 2008 tax years generally remain subject to examination
by federal tax authorities. The 2005 through 2008 tax years
generally remain subject to examination by many state tax
authorities. In significant foreign jurisdictions, the 2001
through 2008 tax years generally remain subject to examination
by their respective tax authorities. The statute of limitations
is scheduled to expire within 12 months of the reporting
date in certain taxing jurisdictions and the Company believes
that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its
unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $0 to
$4 million.
The Company made cash income tax payments, net of refunds, of
$68 million, $83 million and $62 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Such payments exclude income
tax related payments made to or refunded by former Parent.
During 2007, the Company recorded an increase to
stockholders equity of $16 million which was
primarily the result of deferred income tax adjustments arising
from the filing of pre-separation income tax returns. Such
pre-separation adjustments included $69 million of foreign
tax credits with a full valuation allowance of $69 million.
F-23
The foreign tax credits primarily expire in 2015 and the
valuation allowance on these credits will be reduced when and if
the Company determines that these credits are more likely than
not to be realized.
As discussed below, the IRS has commenced an audit of
Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006, during which the
Company was included in Cendants tax returns.
The rules governing taxation are complex and subject to varying
interpretations. Therefore, the Companys tax accruals
reflect a series of complex judgments about future events and
rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. While the Company
believes that the estimates and assumptions supporting its tax
accruals are reasonable, tax audits and any related litigation
could result in tax liabilities for the Company that are
materially different than those reflected in the Companys
historical income tax provisions and recorded assets and
liabilities. The result of an audit or litigation could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys income tax
provision, net income,
and/or
cash
flows in the period or periods to which such audit or litigation
relates.
The Companys recorded tax liabilities in respect of such
taxable years represent the Companys current best
estimates of the probable outcome with respect to certain tax
positions taken by Cendant for which the Company would be
responsible under the tax sharing agreement. As discussed above,
however, the rules governing taxation are complex and subject to
varying interpretation. There can be no assurance that the IRS
will not propose adjustments to the returns for which the
Company would be responsible under the tax sharing agreement or
that any such proposed adjustments would not be material. Any
determination by the IRS or a court that imposed tax liabilities
on the Company under the tax sharing agreement in excess of the
Companys tax accruals could have a material adverse effect
on the Companys income tax provision, net income,
and/or
cash
flows.
|
|
8.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables
|
The Company generates vacation ownership contract receivables by
extending financing to the purchasers of VOIs. Current and
long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Other
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
2,495
|
|
|
$
|
2,218
|
|
Other
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments that are contractually due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
the next twelve months are classified as current on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Principal payments due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2008 and
thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
2010
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
2011
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
2012
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
2013
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,748
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
$
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company originated vacation
ownership receivables of $1,607 million,
$1,608 million and $1,289 million, respectively, and
received principal collections of $821 million,
$773 million and $695 million, respectively. Interest
rates offered on vacation ownership contract receivables range
primarily from 9% to 18%. The weighted average interest rate on
outstanding vacation ownership contract receivables was 12.7%,
12.5% and 12.7% as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
F-24
The activity in the allowance for loan losses related to
vacation ownership contract receivables is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off, net
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off, net
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Contract receivables written off, net
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 152, the Company recorded
the provision for loan losses as a reduction of net revenues.
Securitizations
The Company pools qualifying vacation ownership contract
receivables and sells them to bankruptcy-remote entities.
Vacation ownership contract receivables qualify for
securitization based primarily on the credit strength of the VOI
purchaser to whom financing has been extended. Prior to
September 1, 2003, sales of vacation ownership contract
receivables were treated as off-balance sheet sales as the
entities utilized were structured as bankruptcy-remote QSPEs
pursuant to SFAS No. 140 Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities. Subsequent to September 1, 2003,
newly originated as well as certain legacy vacation ownership
contract receivables are securitized through bankruptcy-remote
SPEs that are consolidated within the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
On Balance Sheet.
Vacation ownership contract receivables
securitized through the on-balance sheet, bankruptcy -remote
SPEs are consolidated within the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements (see Note 13Long-Term Debt and
Borrowing Arrangements). The Company continues to service the
securitized vacation ownership contract receivables pursuant to
servicing agreements negotiated on an arms-length basis based on
market conditions. The activities of these bankruptcy-remote
SPEs are limited to (i) purchasing vacation ownership
contract receivables from the Companys vacation ownership
subsidiaries, (ii) issuing debt securities
and/or
borrowing under a bank conduit facility to affect such purchases
and (iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The securitized assets of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are not available to pay the general obligations of the Company.
Additionally, the creditors of these SPEs have no recourse to
the Companys general credit. The Company has made
representations and warranties customary for securitization
transactions, including eligibility characteristics of the
receivables and servicing responsibilities, in connection with
the securitization of these assets (see
Note 15Commitments and Contingencies). The Company
does not recognize gains or losses resulting from these
securitizations at the time of sale to the on-balance sheet,
bankruptcy-remote SPE. Income is recognized when earned over the
contractual life of the vacation ownership contract receivables.
Off-Balance Sheet.
Certain structures used by the Company
to securitize vacation ownership contract receivables prior to
September 1, 2003 were treated as off-balance sheet sales,
with the Company retaining the servicing rights and a
subordinated interest. These transactions did not qualify for
inclusion in the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
As these securitization facilities were precluded from
consolidation pursuant to generally accepted accounting
principles, the debt issued by these entities and the
collateralizing assets, which were serviced by the Company, are
not reflected on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The Company completed such structures during 2007 and,
therefore, no retained interest was recorded on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2007.
F-25
Inventory, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land held for VOI development
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
VOI construction in process
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
Completed inventory and vacation
credits
(*)
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
$
|
905
|
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Includes estimated recoveries of
$156 million and $128 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
Inventory that the Company expects to sell within the next
twelve months is classified as current on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
10.
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
Property and equipment, net, as of December 31, consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Vacation rental property capital leases
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded depreciation
and amortization expense of $154 million, $139 million
and $113 million, respectively, related to property and
equipment.
Other current assets, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Non-trade receivables, net
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Deferred vacation ownership development costs
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Securitization restricted cash
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow deposit restricted cash
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Other
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
Accrued advertising and marketing
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
$
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
13.
|
Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements
|
Securitized and long-term debt as of December 31 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
Previous bank conduit
facility
(a)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
2008 bank conduit
facility
(b)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
Less: Current portion of securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December
2016)
(c)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011)
(d)
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Vacation ownership bank
borrowings
(e)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,815
|
|
|
$
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents the outstanding balance
of the Companys previous bank conduit facility that ceased
operating as a revolving facility on October 29, 2008 and
will amortize in accordance with its terms, which is expected to
be approximately two years.
|
(b)
|
|
Represents a
364-day,
$943 million, non-recourse vacation ownership bank conduit
facility, with a term through November 2009 whose capacity is
subject to the Companys ability to provide additional
assets to collateralize the facility.
|
(c)
|
|
The balance at December 31,
2008 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$3 million of unamortized discount.
|
(d)
|
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2008, the Company
had $33 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as
such, the total available capacity of the revolving credit
facility was $291 million.
|
(e)
|
|
Represents a
364-day
secured revolving credit facility, which was renewed in June
2008 (expires in June 2009) and upsized from AUD
$225 million to AUD $263 million.
|
The Companys outstanding debt as of December 31, 2008
matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
2010
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
2011
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
2012
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
2013
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
$
|
3,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As debt maturities of the securitized vacation ownership debt
are based on the contractual payment terms of the underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables, actual maturities may
differ as a result of prepayments by the vacation ownership
contract receivable obligors.
The revolving credit facility, unsecured term loan and vacation
ownership bank borrowings include covenants, including the
maintenance of specific financial ratios. These financial
covenants consist of a minimum interest coverage ratio of at
least 3.0 times as of the measurement date and a maximum
leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 times on the measurement date.
The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing EBITDA (as
defined in the credit agreement and Note 20Segment
Information) by Interest Expense (as defined in the credit
agreement), excluding interest expense on any Securitization
Indebtedness and on Non-Recourse Indebtedness (as the two terms
are defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a
trailing 12 month basis preceding the measurement date. The
leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Total
Indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) excluding any
Securitization Indebtedness and any Non-Recourse Secured debt as
of the measurement date by EBITDA as measured on a trailing
12 month basis preceding the measurement date. Covenants in
these credit facilities also include limitations on indebtedness
of material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations, dissolutions and sales of all or substantially all
assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of default in these
credit facilities include nonpayment of principal when due;
nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts; violation
F-27
of covenants; cross payment default and cross acceleration (in
each case, to indebtedness (excluding securitization
indebtedness) in excess of $50 million); and a change of
control (the definition of which permitted the Companys
Separation from Cendant).
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on sale and
leasebacks, and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and sales of
all or substantially all assets. Events of default in the notes
include nonpayment of interest, nonpayment of principal, breach
of a covenant or warranty, cross acceleration of debt in excess
of $50 million, and bankruptcy related matters.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with
all of the covenants described above including the required
financial ratios.
Each of the Companys non-recourse, securitized note
borrowings contain various triggers relating to the performance
of the applicable loan pools. For example, if the vacation
ownership contract receivables pool that collateralizes one of
the Companys securitization notes fails to perform within
the parameters established by the contractual triggers (such as
higher default or delinquency rates), there are provisions
pursuant to which the cash flows for that pool will be
maintained in the securitization as extra collateral for the
note holders or applied to amortize the outstanding principal
held by the noteholders. As of December 31, 2008, all of
the Companys securitized pools were in compliance with
applicable triggers.
As of December 31, 2008 available capacity under the
Companys borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Previous bank conduit facility
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 bank conduit facility
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership
debt
(a)
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011)
(b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Vacation ownership bank
borrowings
(c)
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases
(d)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,333
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
These outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by $2,906 million of underlying gross
vacation ownership contract receivables and securitization
restricted cash. The capacity of the Companys 2008 bank
conduit facility of $943 million is reduced by
$318 million of borrowings on the Companys previous
bank conduit facility. Such amount will be available as capacity
for the Companys 2008 bank conduit facility as the
outstanding balance on the Companys previous bank conduit
facility amortizes in accordance with its terms, which is
expected to be approximately two years. The capacity of this
facility is subject to the Companys ability to provide
additional assets to collateralize additional securitized
borrowings.
|
(b)
|
|
The capacity under the
Companys revolving credit facility includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2008, the
available capacity of $324 million was further reduced by
$33 million for the issuance of letters of credit.
|
(c)
|
|
These borrowings are collateralized
by $199 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables. The capacity of this facility is subject
to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize these secured
obligations.
|
(d)
|
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
|
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
As previously discussed in Note 8Vacation Ownership
Contract Receivables, the Company issues debt through the
securitization of vacation ownership contract receivables. On
May 1, 2008, the Company closed a series of term notes
payable, Sierra Timeshare
2008-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$200 million. These borrowings bear interest at a weighted
average rate of 7.9% and are secured by vacation ownership
contract receivables. As of December 31, 2008, the Company
had $120 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes. On June 26, 2008, the Company closed an additional
series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2008-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$450 million. These borrowings bear interest at a weighted
average rate of 7.2% and are secured by vacation ownership
contract receivables. As of December 31, 2008, the Company
had $278 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had
$854 million of outstanding borrowings under term notes
entered into prior
F-28
to January 1, 2008. Such securitized debt includes fixed
and floating rate term notes for which the weighted average
interest rate was 5.8%, 5.2% and 4.7% during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
On November 10, 2008, the Company closed on a
364-day,
$943 million, non-recourse, securitized vacation ownership
bank conduit facility with a term through November 2009. This
facility bears interest at variable commercial paper rates plus
a spread. The $943 million facility with an advance rate
for new borrowings of approximately 50% represents a decrease
from the $1.2 billion capacity of the Companys
previous bank conduit facility with an advance rate of
approximately 80%. The previous bank conduit facility ceased
operating as a revolving facility as of October 29, 2008
and will amortize in accordance with its terms, which is
expected to be approximately two years. The two bank conduit
facilities, on a combined basis, had a weighted average interest
rate of 4.1%, 5.9% and 5.7% during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, the Companys securitized
vacation ownership debt of $1,810 million is collateralized
by $2,906 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables and securitization restricted cash.
Additional usage of the capacity of the Companys 2008 bank
conduit facility is subject to the Companys ability to
provide additional assets to collateralize such facility. The
combined weighted average interest rate on the Companys
total securitized vacation ownership debt was 5.2%, 5.4% and
5.1% during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cash paid related to consumer financing interest expense was
$106 million, $95 million and $59 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Other
6.00% Senior Unsecured Notes.
The Companys
6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes are redeemable at the Companys option at any
time, in whole or in part, at the appropriate redemption prices
plus accrued interest through the redemption date. These notes
rank equally in right of payment with all of the Companys
other senior unsecured indebtedness.
Term Loan.
During July 2006, the Company entered into a
five-year $300 million term loan facility which bears
interest at LIBOR plus 75 basis points. Subsequent to the
inception of this term loan facility, the Company entered into
an interest rate swap agreement and, as such, the interest rate
is fixed at 6.20%.
Revolving Credit Facility.
The Company maintains a
five-year $900 million revolving credit facility which
currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 62.5 to 75 basis
points. The interest rate of this facility is dependent on the
Companys credit ratings and the outstanding balance of
borrowings on this facility. During July 2008, the Company drew
down on its revolving credit facility to fund the acquisition of
USFS. In addition, in conjunction with closing the 2008 bank
conduit facility, the Company drew approximately
$215 million on its revolving credit facility to bring the
Companys previous bank conduit facility in line with the
lower advance rate and tighter eligibility requirements.
Vacation Ownership Bank Borrowings.
The Company maintains
a
364-day
secured, revolving foreign credit facility used to support the
Companys vacation ownership operations in the South
Pacific. Such facility was renewed and upsized from AUD
$225 million to AUD $263 million in June 2008 and
expires in June 2009. This facility bears interest at Australian
BBSY plus a spread and had a weighted average interest rate of
8.1%, 7.2% and 6.5% during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
These secured borrowings are collateralized by $199 million
of underlying gross vacation ownership contract receivables as
of December 31, 2008. The capacity of this facility is
subject to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize these
secured obligations.
Vacation Rental Bank Borrowings.
On January 31,
2007, the Company repaid bank debt outstanding borrowings of
$73 million related to the Companys Landal GreenParks
business. The bank debt was collateralized by $130 million
of land and related vacation rental assets and had a weighted
average interest rate of 3.7% during 2006.
Vacation Rental Capital Leases.
The Company leases
vacation homes located in European holiday parks as part of its
vacation exchange and rentals business. The majority of these
leases are recorded as capital lease obligations under generally
accepted accounting principles with corresponding assets
classified within property, plant and equipment on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The vacation rentals capital lease
obligations had a weighted average interest rate of 4.5% during
2008, 2007 and 2006.
Other.
The Company also maintains other debt facilities
which arise through the ordinary course of operations. This debt
principally reflects $11 million of mortgage borrowings
related to an office building.
Vacation Ownership Asset-linked Debt.
Prior to the
Companys Separation from Cendant, the Company previously
borrowed under a $600 million asset-linked facility through
Cendant to support the creation of certain vacation
ownership-related assets and the acquisition and development of
vacation ownership properties. In connection with the
Separation, Cendant eliminated the outstanding borrowings under
this facility of $600 million
F-29
on July 27, 2006. The weighted average interest rate on
these borrowings was 5.5% during the period January 1, 2006
through July 27, 2006.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
other debt was to $99 million, $96 million and
$72 million during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In
addition, the Company recorded $11 million of interest
expense related to interest on local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions during 2006. All such amounts are recorded
within the interest expense line item on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Operations. Cash paid related to such
interest expense was $100 million, $89 million and
$60 million during 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Interest expense is partially offset on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Operations by capitalized interest of
$19 million, $23 million and $16 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 157, which requires additional disclosures
about the Companys assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value. The following table presents information
about the Companys financial assets and liabilities that
are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2008, and indicates the fair value hierarchy
of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine
such fair values. Financial assets and liabilities carried at
fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following
three categories:
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active
markets.
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose
inputs are observable or whose significant value driver is
observable.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs used when little or no market
data is available.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall
into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such
cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the
fair value measurement falls has been determined based on the
lowest level input (closest to Level 3) that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair
value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and
considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measure on a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
instruments
(a)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
(b)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
instruments
(c)
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Included in other current assets
and other non-current assets on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
|
(b)
|
|
Included in other non-current
assets on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
(c)
|
|
Included in accrued expenses and
other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities on
the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
The Companys derivative instruments are primarily
pay-fixed/receive-variable interest rate swaps, interest rate
caps, foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange
average rate forward contracts. For assets and liabilities that
are measured using quoted prices in active markets, the fair
value is the published market price per unit multiplied by the
number of units held without consideration of transaction costs.
Assets and liabilities that are measured using other significant
observable inputs are valued by reference to similar assets and
liabilities. For these items, a significant portion of fair
value is derived by reference to quoted prices of similar assets
and liabilities in active markets. For assets and liabilities
that are measured using significant unobservable inputs, fair
value is derived using a fair value model, such as a discounted
cash flow model.
F-30
The following table presents additional information about
financial assets which are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to
determine fair value as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
Using Significant
|
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
Securities Available-For-Sale
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Leases
The Company is committed to making rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases covering various facilities and
equipment. Future minimum lease payments required under
noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2008 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncancelable
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
2010
|
|
|
64
|
|
2011
|
|
|
52
|
|
2012
|
|
|
40
|
|
2013
|
|
|
29
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred total rental
expense of $93 million, $79 million and
$65 million, respectively.
Purchase
Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company makes various
commitments to purchase goods or services from specific
suppliers, including those related to vacation ownership resort
development and other capital expenditures. Purchase commitments
made by the Company as of December 31, 2008 aggregated
$778 million. Individually, such commitments range as high
as $100 million related to the development of a vacation
ownership resort. The majority of the commitments relate to the
development of vacation ownership properties (aggregating
$512 million; $236 million of which relates to 2009).
Letters
of Credit
As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
Company had $33 million and $53 million, respectively,
of irrevocable letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
support development activity at the Companys vacation
ownership business.
Surety
Bonds
Some of the Companys vacation ownership developments are
supported by surety bonds provided by affiliates of certain
insurance companies in order to meet regulatory requirements of
certain states. In the ordinary course of the Companys
business, it has assembled commitments from thirteen surety
providers in the amount of $1.5 billion, of which the
Company had $759 million outstanding as of
December 31, 2008. The availability, terms and conditions,
and pricing of such bonding capacity is dependent on, among
other things, continued financial strength and stability of the
insurance company affiliates providing such bonding capacity,
the general availability of such capacity and the Companys
corporate credit rating. If such bonding capacity is unavailable
or, alternatively, the terms and conditions and pricing of such
bonding capacity may be unacceptable to the Company, the cost of
development of the Companys vacation ownership units could
be negatively impacted.
F-31
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings and
governmental inquiries related to contract disputes, business
practices, intellectual property and other matters relating to
the Companys business, including, without limitation,
commercial, employment, tax and environmental matters. Such
matters include, but are not limited to: (i) for the
Companys vacation ownership business, alleged failure to
perform duties arising under management agreements, and claims
for construction defects and inadequate maintenance (which are
made by property owners associations from time to time);
and (ii) for the Companys vacation exchange and
rentals business, breach of contract claims by both affiliates
and members in connection with their respective agreements and
bad faith and consumer protection claims asserted by members.
See Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings for
a description of claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of the Companys business. See also
Note 22Separation Adjustments and Transactions with
Former Parent and Subsidiaries regarding contingent litigation
liabilities resulting from the Separation.
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for such
matters with reserves of approximately $8 million at
December 31, 2008. Such amount is exclusive of matters
relating to the Separation. For matters not requiring accrual,
the Company believes that such matters will not have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position
or cash flows based on information currently available. However,
litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company
believes that its accruals are adequate
and/or
that
it has valid defenses in these matters, unfavorable resolutions
could occur. As such, an adverse outcome from such unresolved
proceedings for which claims are awarded in excess of the
amounts accrued, if any, could be material to the Company with
respect to earnings or cash flows in any given reporting period.
However, the Company does not believe that the impact of such
unresolved litigation should result in a material liability to
the Company in relation to its consolidated financial position
or liquidity.
Guarantees/Indemnifications
Standard
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
agreements that contain standard guarantees and indemnities
whereby the Company indemnifies another party for specified
breaches of or third-party claims relating to an underlying
agreement. Such underlying agreements are typically entered into
by one of the Companys subsidiaries. The various
underlying agreements generally govern purchases, sales or
outsourcing of assets or businesses, leases of real estate,
licensing of trademarks, development of vacation ownership
properties, access to credit facilities, derivatives and
issuances of debt securities. While a majority of these
guarantees and indemnifications extend only for the duration of
the underlying agreement, some survive the expiration of the
agreement. The Company is not able to estimate the maximum
potential amount of future payments to be made under these
guarantees and indemnifications as the triggering events are not
predictable. In certain cases the Company maintains insurance
coverage that may mitigate any potential payments.
Other
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Companys vacation
ownership business provides guarantees to certain owners
associations for funds required to operate and maintain vacation
ownership properties in excess of assessments collected from
owners of the VOIs. The Company may be required to fund such
excess as a result of unsold Company-owned VOIs or failure by
owners to pay such assessments. These guarantees extend for the
duration of the underlying subsidy agreements (which generally
approximate one year and are renewable on an annual basis) or
until a stipulated percentage (typically 80% or higher) of
related VOIs are sold. The maximum potential future payments
that the Company could be required to make under these
guarantees was approximately $350 million as of
December 31, 2008. The Company would only be required to
pay this maximum amount if none of the owners assessed paid
their assessments. Any assessments collected from the owners of
the VOIs would reduce the maximum potential amount of future
payments to be made by the Company. Additionally, should the
Company be required to fund the deficit through the payment of
any owners assessments under these guarantees, the Company
would be permitted access to the property for its own use and
may use that property to engage in revenue-producing activities,
such as rentals. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company made
payments related to these guarantees of $7 million,
$5 million and $6 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company maintained a
liability in connection with these guarantees of
$37 million and $30 million, respectively, on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
hotel management agreements which may provide a guarantee by the
Company of minimum returns to the hotel owner. Under such
guarantees, the Company is required to compensate for any
shortfall over the life of the management agreement up to a
specified aggregate amount. The Companys exposure under
these guarantees is partially mitigated by the Companys
ability to terminate any such management agreement if certain
targeted operating results are not met. Additionally, the
Company is able
F-32
to recapture a portion or all of the shortfall payments and any
waived fees in the event that future operating results exceed
targets. The maximum potential amount of future payments to be
made under these guarantees is $15 million. The underlying
agreements would not require payment until 2010 or thereafter.
As of both December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company
maintained a liability in connection with these guarantees of
less than $1 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.
See Note 22Separation Adjustments and Transactions
with Former Parent and Subsidiaries for contingent liabilities
related to the Companys Separation.
|
|
16.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
on Cash Flow
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Hedges, Net
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006, net of tax of $58
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
Period change
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006, net of tax of $43
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Period change
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007, net of tax of $47
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008, net of tax benefit of $72
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income taxes
related to investments in foreign subsidiaries where the Company
intends to reinvest the undistributed earnings indefinitely in
those foreign operations.
|
|
17.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan available to
grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options,
SSARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units
(RSUs) and other stock or cash-based awards to key
employees, non-employee directors, advisors and consultants.
Under the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan, a maximum of 43.5 million shares of common
stock may be awarded. As of December 31, 2008,
22.1 million shares were available for grants.
Incentive
Equity Awards Granted by the Company
The activity related to the Companys incentive equity
awards for the year ended December 31, 2008 consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
SSARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of RSUs
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
|
of SSARs
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
34.09
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
34.27
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2.8
|
(b)
|
|
|
20.05
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
(b)
|
|
|
20.61
|
|
Vested/exercised
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
33.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
28.38
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
26.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2008
(a)
|
|
|
4.1
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
25.34
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
(d)
|
|
$
|
27.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Aggregate unrecognized compensation
expense related to SSARs and RSUs was $82 million as of
December 31, 2008 which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.6 years.
|
(b)
|
|
Primarily represents awards granted
by the Company on February 29, 2008.
|
(c)
|
|
Approximately 3.5 million RSUs
outstanding at December 31, 2008 are expected to vest over
time.
|
(d)
|
|
Approximately 500,000 of the
1.7 million SSARs are exercisable at December 31,
2008. The Company assumes that the remaining unvested SSARs are
expected to vest over time. SSARs outstanding at
December 31, 2008 had an intrinsic value of $200,000 and
have a weighted average remaining contractual life of
5.1 years.
|
On February 29, 2008, May 2, 2008 and December 1,
2008, the Company approved the grants of incentive awards
totaling $60 million to key employees and senior officers
of Wyndham in the form of RSUs and SSARs. The awards will vest
ratably over a period of four years.
The fair value of SSARs granted by the Company on
February 29, 2008, May 2, 2008 and December 1,
2008 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the weighted average assumptions
outlined in the table below. Expected volatility is based on
both historical and implied volatilities of
F-33
(i) the Companys stock and (ii) the stock of
comparable companies over the estimated expected life of the
SSARs. The expected life represents the period of time the SSARs
are expected to be outstanding and is based on the
simplified method, as defined in SAB 110. The
risk free interest rate is based on yields on U.S. Treasury
strips with a maturity similar to the estimated expected life of
the SSARs. The dividend yield was based on the Companys
annual dividend divided by the closing price of the
Companys stock on the date of the grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs Issued on
|
|
|
|
December 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
February 1,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
7.27
|
|
|
$
|
6.74
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
84.4%
|
|
|
|
34.4%
|
|
|
|
35.9%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
1.48%
|
|
|
|
3.05%
|
|
|
|
2.37%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
3.70%
|
|
|
|
0.67%
|
|
|
|
0.72%
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of
$35 million, $26 million and $13 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006 (from the date of Separation through
December 31, 2006), respectively, related to the incentive
equity awards granted by the Company. During 2008, 2007 and 2006
(from the date of Separation through December 31, 2006),
the Company recognized $14 million of tax benefit,
$10 million of tax benefit and $2 million of tax
expense, respectively, for share based compensation arrangements
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.
During 2006 (through the date of Separation), Cendant allocated
pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $12 million to
the Company. Such compensation expense relates only to the
options and RSUs that were granted to Cendants employees
subsequent to January 1, 2003. The total income tax benefit
recognized in the Combined Statement of Operations for share
based compensation arrangements was $5 million during 2006
(through the date of Separation). The allocation was based on
the estimated number of options and RSUs Cendant believed it
would ultimately provide and the underlying vesting period of
the awards. As Cendant measured its stock-based compensation
expense using intrinsic value method during the periods prior to
January 1, 2003, Cendant did not recognize compensation
expense upon the issuance of equity awards to its employees.
Incentive
Equity Awards Conversion
Prior to August 1, 2006, all employee stock awards (stock
options and RSUs) were granted by Cendant. At the time of
Separation, a portion of Cendants outstanding equity
awards were converted into equity awards of the Company at a
ratio of one share of Companys common stock for every five
shares of Cendants common stock. As a result, the Company
issued approximately 2 million RSUs and approximately
24 million stock options upon completion of the conversion
of existing Cendant equity awards into Wyndham equity awards. As
of December 31, 2008, there were no converted RSUs
outstanding.
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved a change to the date on which all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) would become fully vested. These equity
awards vested on August 15, 2006 rather than
August 30, 2006 (which was the previous date upon which
such equity awards were to vest).
As a result of the acceleration of the vesting of all employee
stock awards granted by Cendant, the Company recorded non-cash
compensation expense of $45 million during the third
quarter of 2006. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash
expense of $9 million related to equitable adjustments to
the accelerated awards during 2006. The $54 million of
expense is recorded within separation and related costs on the
Combined Statement of Operations.
F-34
The activity related to the converted stock options for the year
ended December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
36.71
|
|
Exercised
(a)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
47.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2008
(b)
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
35.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Stock options exercised during 2008
and 2007 had an intrinsic value of $600,000 and
$21 million, respectively.
|
(b)
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had zero outstanding in the money stock
options and, as such, the intrinsic value was zero. All
11.2 million options were exercisable as of
December 31, 2008. Options outstanding and exercisable as
of December 31, 2008 have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 1.8 years.
|
The following table summarizes information regarding the
Companys outstanding and exercisable converted stock
options as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$10.00 $19.99
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
19.77
|
|
$20.00 $29.99
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
27.45
|
|
$30.00 $39.99
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
37.47
|
|
$40.00 & Above
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
43.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
35.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Contribution Benefit Plans
Wyndham sponsors a domestic defined contribution savings plan
and a domestic deferred compensation plan that provide certain
eligible employees of the Company an opportunity to accumulate
funds for retirement. The Company matches the contributions of
participating employees on the basis specified by each plan. The
Companys cost for these plans was $25 million,
$23 million and $20 million during 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
In addition, the Company contributes to several foreign employee
benefit contributory plans which also provide eligible employees
with an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. The
Companys contributory cost for these plans was
$13 million, $11 million and $7 million during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans for certain
foreign subsidiaries. Under these plans, benefits are based on
an employees years of credited service and a percentage of
final average compensation or as otherwise described by the
plan. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Companys
net pension liability of $7 million and $8 million,
respectively, is fully recognized as other non-current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company recorded $1 million and
$2 million, respectively, within accumulated other
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an
unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized gain. As of
December 31, 2007, the Company recorded $1 million and
$3 million, respectively, within accumulated other
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an
unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized gain.
The Companys policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to
meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws plus such additional amounts that the
Company determines to be appropriate. During 2008, 2007 and
2006, the Company recorded pension expense of $2 million,
$2 million and $1 million, respectively. In addition,
during 2008, the Company recorded a $1 million net gain on
curtailments of two defined benefit pension plans.
F-35
|
|
19.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
Risk
Management
Following is a description of the Companys risk management
policies:
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to manage
its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates
associated with its foreign currency denominated receivables,
forecasted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and forecasted
foreign currency denominated vendor costs. The Company primarily
hedges its foreign currency exposure to the British pound and
Euro. The majority of forward contracts utilized by the Company
do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. The fluctuations in
the value of these forward contracts do, however, largely offset
the impact of changes in the value of the underlying risk that
they are intended to hedge. Forward contracts that are used to
hedge certain forecasted disbursements and receipts up to
18 months are designated and do qualify as cash flow
hedges. The amount of gains or losses reclassified from other
comprehensive income to earnings resulting from ineffectiveness
or from excluding a component of the forward contracts
gain or loss from the effectiveness calculation for cash flow
hedges during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was not material. The impact
of these forward contracts was not material to the
Companys results of operations or financial position
during 2008, 2007 and 2006. The amount of gains or losses the
Company expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income to
earnings over the next 12 months is not material.
Interest
Rate Risk
The debt used to finance much of the Companys operations
is also exposed to interest rate fluctuations. The Company uses
various hedging strategies and derivative financial instruments
to create a desired mix of fixed and floating rate assets and
liabilities. Derivative instruments currently used in these
hedging strategies include swaps and interest rate caps.
The derivatives used to manage the risk associated with the
Companys floating rate debt include freestanding
derivatives and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. In
connection with its qualifying cash flow hedges, the Company
recorded a net pre-tax loss of $38 million,
$22 million and $13 million during 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively, to other comprehensive income. The pre-tax
amount of gains or losses reclassified from other comprehensive
income to earnings resulting from ineffectiveness or from
excluding a component of the derivatives gain or loss from
the effectiveness calculation for cash flow hedges was
insignificant during 2008, 2007 and 2006. The amount of gains or
losses that the Company expects to reclassify from other
comprehensive income to earnings during the next 12 months
is not material. These freestanding derivatives had a nominal
impact on the Companys results of operations in 2008, 2007
and 2006.
Credit
Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event
of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and
sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating
the financial position and creditworthiness of such
counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which
financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit
risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the
amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts,
periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and
financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk
among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2008, there were no significant
concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty
or groups of counterparties. However, approximately 20% of the
Companys outstanding vacation ownership contract
receivables portfolio relates to customers who reside in
California. With the exception of the financing provided to
customers of its vacation ownership businesses, the Company does
not normally require collateral or other security to support
credit sales.
Market
Risk
The Company is subject to risks relating to the geographic
concentrations of (i) areas in which the Company is
currently developing and selling vacation ownership properties,
(ii) sales offices in certain vacation areas and
(iii) customers of the Companys vacation ownership
business; which in each case, may result in the Companys
results of operations being more sensitive to local and regional
economic conditions and other factors, including competition,
natural disasters and economic downturns, than the
Companys results of operations would be absent such
geographic concentrations. Local and regional economic
conditions and other factors may differ materially from
prevailing conditions in other parts of the world. Florida,
Nevada and California are examples of areas with concentrations
of sales offices. For the twelve months ended December 31,
2008, approximately 14%, 12% and 12%
F-36
of the Companys VOI sales revenue was generated in sales
offices located in Florida, Nevada and California, respectively.
Included within the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Operations is approximately 11% of net revenue generated from
transactions in the state of Florida in each of 2008, 2007 and
2006 and approximately 10% of net revenue generated from
transactions in the state of California in each of 2008, 2007
and 2006.
Fair
Value
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined
by reference to market values resulting from trading on a
national securities exchange or in an over-the-counter market.
In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair
value is based on estimates using present value or other
valuation techniques, as appropriate. The carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term
maturities of these assets and liabilities. The carrying amounts
and estimated fair values of all other financial instruments as
of December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
3,254
|
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
|
$
|
2,944
|
|
|
$
|
2,944
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
Derivatives
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps and caps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Derivative instruments are in net
loss positions as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
The weighted average interest rate on outstanding vacation
ownership contract receivables was 12.7%, 12.5% and 12.7% as of
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
estimated fair value of the vacation ownership contract
receivables as of December 31, 2008 was approximately 82%
of the carrying value. The primary reason for the fair value
being lower than the carrying value related to the volatile
credit markets in the latter part of 2008. Although the
outstanding vacation ownership contract receivables had a
weighted average interest rate of 12.7%, the estimated market
rate of return for a portfolio of contract receivables of
similar characteristics in current market conditions exceeded
15%. The estimated fair value of as of December 31, 2007
approximated the carrying value because the gap between the
weighted average interest rate and market rate of return was not
significant.
The reportable segments presented below represent the
Companys operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which are utilized on a regular
basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its
reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of
services provided by its operating segments. Management
evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable
segments based upon revenue and EBITDA, which is
defined as net income/(loss) before depreciation and
amortization, interest expense (excluding interest on
securitized vacation ownership debt), interest income, income
taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax,
each of which is presented on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Operations. The Company believes that EBITDA is a
useful measure of performance for the Companys industry
segments which, when considered with GAAP measures, the Company
believes gives a more complete understanding of the
Companys operating performance. The Companys
presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly-titled
measures used by other companies.
F-37
Year
Ended or at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other
(b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues
(a)
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
$
|
1,259
|
|
|
$
|
2,278
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
EBITDA
(c)
|
|
|
218
|
(d)
|
|
|
248
|
(e)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
(f)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
(g)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
9,573
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Year
Ended or at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other
(b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues
(a)
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
$
|
2,425
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
EBITDA
(h)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
(i)
|
|
|
883
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
10,459
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other
(b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues
(a)
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
2,068
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
EBITDA
(j)
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
(k)
|
|
|
725
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Transactions between segments are
recorded at fair value and eliminated in consolidation.
Inter-segment net revenues were not significant to the net
revenues of any one segment.
|
(b)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(c)
|
|
Includes restructuring costs of
$4 million, $9 million and $66 million for
Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals and Vacation Ownership,
respectively.
|
(d)
|
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $16 million ($10 million, net of tax)
primarily due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards.
|
(e)
|
|
Includes (i) non-cash
impairment charges of $36 million ($28 million, net of
tax) due to trademark and fixed asset write downs resulting from
a strategic change in direction and reduced future investments
in a vacation rentals business and the write-off of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture and
(ii) charges of $24 million ($24 million, net of
tax) due to currency conversion losses related to the transfer
of cash from the Companys Venezuelan operations.
|
(f)
|
|
Includes (i) a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax) as a result of organizational
realignment plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008
which reduced future cash flow estimates by lowering the
Companys expected VOI sales pace in the future based on
the expectation that access to the asset-backed securities
market will continue to be challenging, (ii) a non-cash
impairment charge of $28 million ($17 million, net of
tax) due to the Companys initiative to rebrand its
vacation ownership trademarks to the Wyndham brand and
(iii) a non-cash impairment charge of $4 million
($3 million, net of tax) related to the termination of a
development project.
|
(g)
|
|
Includes $45 million of
corporate costs and $18 million of net benefit related to
the resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent
liabilities and assets.
|
(h)
|
|
Includes separation and related
costs of $9 million and $7 million for Vacation
Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively.
|
(i)
|
|
Includes $55 million of
corporate costs, partially offset by $46 million of a net
benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets.
|
(j)
|
|
Includes separation and related
costs of $2 million, $3 million, $18 million and
$76 million for Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals,
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively.
|
(k)
|
|
Includes $99 million of
corporate costs, partially offset by $32 million of a net
benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets.
|
F-38
Provided below is a reconciliation of EBITDA to income/(loss)
before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(635
|
)
|
|
$
|
883
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The geographic segment information provided below is classified
based on the geographic location of the Companys
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Countries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended or At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,244
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended or At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,390
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
3,721
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
4,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Restructuring
and Impairments
|
Restructuring
During 2008, the Company committed to various strategic
realignment initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs,
enhancing organizational efficiency and consolidating and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities. As a result,
the Company recorded $79 million of restructuring costs
during 2008, of which $16 million has been paid in cash.
The remaining balance of $40 million is expected to be paid
in cash; $27 million of personnel-related by May 2010 and
$13 million of primarily facility-related by November 2013.
Total restructuring costs by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Asset Write-offs/
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
(a)
|
|
|
Related
(b)
|
|
|
Impairments
(c)
|
|
|
Termination
(d)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents severance benefits
resulting from reductions of approximately 4,500 in staff. The
Company formally communicated the termination of employment to
substantially all 4,500 employees, representing a wide
range of employee groups. As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had terminated approximately 900 of these employees.
|
(b)
|
|
Primarily related to the
termination of leases of certain sales offices.
|
(c)
|
|
Primarily related to the write-off
of assets from sales office closures and cancelled development
projects.
|
(d)
|
|
Primarily represents costs incurred
in connection with the termination of an outsourcing agreement
at the Companys vacation exchange and rentals business.
|
The activity related to the restructuring costs is summarized by
category as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
Opening
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Personnel-Related
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Facility-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
Impairments
During 2008, the Company recorded a charge to impair goodwill
recorded at the Companys vacation ownership reporting
unit. See Note 5Intangible Assets for further
information. In addition, the Company recorded charges to reduce
the carrying value of certain assets based on their revised
estimated fair values. Such charges were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
36
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets represents
(i) charge of $28 million to impair the value of
trademarks related to rebranding initiatives at the
Companys vacation ownership business (see
Note 5Intangible Assets for more information) and
(ii) a charge of $8 million to impair the value of a
trademark due to a strategic change in direction and reduced
future investments in a vacation rentals business. The
impairment of definite-lived intangible assets represents a
charge due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards. The impairment of long-lived assets represents
(i) a charge of $15 million to impair the value of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture of
the Companys vacation exchange and rentals business,
(ii) a charge of $13 million to impair the value of
fixed assets related to the vacation rentals business discussed
above and (iii) a charge of $4 million related to the
termination of a vacation ownership development project.
Additionally, the Company recorded an $11 million charge
during 2006 related to trademark impairments resulting from
rebranding initiatives at the Companys vacation ownership
business (see Note 5Intangible Assets).
|
|
22.
|
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
|
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of the Companys common stock to Cendant
shareholders, the Company entered into certain guarantee
commitments with Cendant (pursuant to the assumption of certain
liabilities and the obligation to indemnify Cendant and
Cendants former real estate services (Realogy)
and travel distribution services (Travelport) for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
the Company assumed and is responsible for 37.5%, while Realogy
is responsible for the remaining 62.5%. The amount of
liabilities which were assumed by the Company in connection with
the Separation was $343 million and $349 million at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
These amounts were comprised of certain Cendant corporate
liabilities which were recorded on the books of Cendant as well
as additional liabilities which were established for guarantees
issued at the date of Separation related to certain unresolved
contingent matters and certain others that could arise during
the guarantee period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the
companies responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities
were to default in its payment of costs or expenses related to
any such liability, the Company would be responsible for a
portion of the defaulting party or parties obligation. The
Company also provided a default guarantee related to certain
deferred compensation arrangements related to certain current
and former senior officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and
Travelport. These arrangements, which are discussed in more
detail below, have been valued upon the Separation in accordance
with Financial Interpretation No. 45
(FIN 45) Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others and recorded as
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent
such recorded liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate
payment amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to
the results of operations in future periods.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to the Company and Avis Budget Group to
satisfy the fair value of Realogys indemnification
obligations for the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the
event Realogy does not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the
extent they become due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a
$500 million irrevocable standby letter of credit from a
major commercial bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon
which demand may be made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy
its obligations for its share of the Cendant legacy contingent
liabilities. The letter of credit can be adjusted from time to
F-40
time based upon the outstanding contingent liabilities and has
an expiration of September 2013, subject to renewal and certain
provisions. The issuance of this letter of credit does not
relieve or limit Realogys obligations for these
liabilities.
The $343 million of Separation related liabilities is
comprised of $35 million for litigation matters,
$267 million for tax liabilities, $27 million for
liabilities of previously sold businesses of Cendant,
$7 million for other contingent and corporate liabilities
and $7 million of liabilities where the calculated
FIN 45 guarantee amount exceeded the SFAS No. 5
Accounting for Contingencies liability assumed at
the date of Separation (of which $5 million of the
$7 million pertain to litigation liabilities). In
connection with these liabilities, $80 million are recorded
in current due to former Parent and subsidiaries and
$265 million are recorded in long-term due to former Parent
and subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. The Company is indemnifying Cendant for these
contingent liabilities and therefore any payments would be made
to the third party through the former Parent. The
$7 million relating to the FIN 45 guarantees is
recorded in other current liabilities at December 31, 2008
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, at
December 31, 2008, the Company has $3 million of
receivables due from former Parent and subsidiaries primarily
relating to income tax refunds, which is recorded in current due
from former Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Such receivables totaled $18 million at
December 31, 2007.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which the
Company issued guarantees. See Managements Discussion and
AnalysisContractual Obligations for the timing of payments
related to these liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities
The Company assumed
37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising
out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is
named as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will
continue until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. The Company
will indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to
make payments related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
indemnification obligation relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherently uncertain nature of the litigation process, the
timing of payments related to these liabilities cannot be
reasonably predicted, but is expected to occur over several
years. Since the Separation, Cendant settled a number of these
lawsuits and the Company assumed a portion of the related
indemnification obligations. As discussed above, for each
settlement, the Company paid 37.5% of the aggregate settlement
amount to Cendant. The Companys payment obligations under
the settlements were greater or less than the Companys
accruals, depending on the matter. During 2007, Cendant received
an adverse order in a litigation matter for which the Company
retains a 37.5% indemnification obligation. The Company has
filed an appeal related to this adverse order. As a result of
the order, however, the Company increased its contingent
litigation accrual for this matter during 2007 by
$27 million. As a result of these settlements and payments
to Cendant, as well as other reductions and accruals for
developments in active litigation matters, the Companys
aggregate accrual for outstanding Cendant contingent litigation
liabilities decreased from $36 million at December 31,
2007 to $35 million at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities
The Company is generally
liable for 37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities. In
addition, each of the Company, Cendant and Realogy may be
responsible for 100% of certain of Cendants tax
liabilities that will provide the responsible party with a
future, offsetting tax benefit. The Company will pay to Cendant
the amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax Sharing
Agreement, as amended during the third quarter of 2008, for the
payment of certain taxes. As a result of the amendment to the
Tax Sharing Agreement, the Company recorded a gross up of its
contingent tax liability and has a corresponding deferred tax
asset of $30 million as of December 31, 2008. This
liability will remain outstanding until tax audits related to
the 2006 tax year are completed or the statutes of limitations
governing the 2006 tax year have passed. The Companys
maximum exposure cannot be quantified as tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and the outcome of tax audits or
litigation is inherently uncertain. Prior to the Separation, the
Company was included in the consolidated federal and state
income tax returns of Cendant through the Separation date for
the 2006 period then ended. Balances due to Cendant for these
pre-Separation tax returns and related tax attributes were
estimated as of December 31, 2006 and have since been
adjusted in connection with the filing of the pre-Separation tax
returns. These balances will again be adjusted after the
ultimate settlement of the related tax audits of these periods.
|
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities
The
Company has assumed 37.5% of corporate liabilities of Cendant
including liabilities relating to (i) Cendants
terminated or divested businesses, (ii) liabilities
relating to the Travelport sale, if any, and
(iii) generally any actions with respect to the Separation
plan or the distributions brought by any third party. The
Companys maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as
this guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be
made against Cendant. The Company assessed the probability and
amount of potential liability related to this guarantee based on
the extent and nature of historical experience.
|
F-41
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation arrangements
In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, the
Company has guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating
to amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This
guarantee will remain outstanding until such deferred
compensation balances are distributed to the respective officers
and directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
|
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to the Companys Separation from Cendant, it entered
into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis
Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agreed to provide the Company with various services,
including services relating to human resources and employee
benefits, payroll, financial systems management, treasury and
cash management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA were provided by one
of the separated companies following the date of such
companys separation from Cendant. Such services were
substantially completed as of December 31, 2007. For the
year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded
$1 million and $13 million, respectively, of expenses
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to these
agreements. During 2006, the Company recorded $8 million of
expenses and less than $1 million in other revenues.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2007, the Company incurred costs of $16 million in
connection with executing the Separation, consisting primarily
of expenses related to the rebranding initiative at the
Companys vacation ownership business and certain
transitional expenses. During 2006, the Company incurred costs
of $99 million in connection with executing the Separation,
consisting primarily of (i) the acceleration of vesting of
certain employee incentive awards and the related equitable
adjustments of such awards, (ii) an impairment charge due
to a rebranding initiative for the Companys Fairfield and
Trendwest trademarks and (iii) consulting and
payroll-related services.
|
|
23.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Net
Intercompany Funding to Former Parent
The following table summarizes related party transactions
occurring between the Company and Cendant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former Parent, beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
Corporate-related functions
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Income taxes, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Net interest earned on net intercompany funding to former Parent
|
|
|
24
|
|
Advances to former Parent, net
|
|
|
123
|
|
Acceleration of restricted stock units
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Elimination of intercompany balance due to former Parent
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former Parent, ending balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Related
Functions
Prior to the date of Separation, the Company was allocated
general corporate overhead expenses from Cendant for
corporate-related functions based on a percentage of the
Companys forecasted revenues. General corporate overhead
expense allocations included executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, financial systems management, legal,
treasury and cash management, certain employee benefits and real
estate usage for common space. During 2006, the Company was
allocated $20 million of general corporate expenses from
Cendant, which are included within general and administrative
expenses on the Combined Statement of Operations. Such amount
includes allocations only from January 1, 2006 through the
date of Separation (July 31, 2006).
Prior to the date of Separation, Cendant also incurred certain
expenses on behalf of the Company. These expenses, which
directly benefited the Company, were allocated to the Company
based upon the Companys actual utilization of the
services. Direct allocations included costs associated with
insurance, information technology, telecommunications and real
estate usage for Company-specific space for some but not all of
the periods presented. During 2006, the Company was allocated
$36 million of expenses directly benefiting the Company,
which are included within general and administrative and
operating expenses on the Combined Statement of Operations. Such
amount includes allocations from January 1, 2006 through
the date of Separation (July 31, 2006).
F-42
The Company believes the assumptions and methodologies
underlying the allocations of general corporate overhead and
direct expenses from Cendant were reasonable. However, such
expenses were not indicative of, nor is it practical or
meaningful for the Company to estimate for all historical
periods presented, the actual level of expenses that would have
been incurred had the Company been operating as a separate,
stand-alone public company.
Income
Taxes, net
Prior to the Separation, the Company was included in the
consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Cendant
through the Separation date for the 2006 period then ended.
Balances due to Cendant for these pre-Separation tax returns and
related tax attributes were estimated as of December 31,
2006 and have since been adjusted in connection with the filing
of the pre-Separation tax returns. These balances will again be
adjusted after the ultimate settlement of the related tax audits
for these periods.
Net
Interest Earned on Net Intercompany Funding to Former
Parent
Prior to the Separation, certain of the advances between the
Company and Cendant were interest-bearing. In connection with
the interest-bearing balances, the Company recorded net interest
income of $24 million during 2006.
Related
Party Agreements
Prior to the Separation, the Company conducted the following
business activities, among others, with Cendants other
business units or newly separated companies, as applicable:
(i) provision of access to hotel accommodation and vacation
exchange and rentals inventory to be distributed through
Travelport; (ii) utilization of employee relocation
services, including relocation policy management, household
goods moving services and departure and destination real estate
related services; (iii) utilization of commercial real
estate brokerage services, such as transaction management,
acquisition and disposition services, broker price opinions,
renewal due diligence and portfolio review;
(iv) utilization of corporate travel management services of
Travelport; and (v) designation of Cendants car
rental brands, Avis and Budget, as the exclusive primary and
secondary suppliers, respectively, of car rental services for
the Companys employees. The majority of the related party
agreement transactions were settled in cash. The majority of
these commercial relationships have continued since the
Separation under agreements formalized in connection with the
Separation.
F-43
|
|
24.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data(unaudited)
|
Provided below is selected unaudited quarterly financial data
for 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
Corporate and
Other
(a)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
1,226
|
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
(d)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
(e)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
7
|
(c)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
(f)
|
Corporate and
Other
(a)(g)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
(1,280
|
)
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
(7.63
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
(7.63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(b)
|
|
Includes restructuring costs of
(i) $4 million and $2 million for Lodging and
Vacation Exchange and Rentals, respectively, during the third
quarter and (ii) $7 million and $66 million for
Vacation Exchange and Rentals and Vacation Ownership,
respectively, during the fourth quarter.
|
(c)
|
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $28 million ($17 million, net of tax) due to
the Companys initiative to rebrand its vacation ownership
trademarks to the Wyndham brand.
|
(d)
|
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $16 million ($10 million, net of tax)
primarily due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards.
|
(e)
|
|
Includes (i) non-cash
impairment charges of $36 million ($28 million, net of
tax) due to trademark and fixed asset write downs resulting from
a strategic change in direction and reduced future investments
in a vacation rentals business and the write-off of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture and
(ii) charges of $24 million ($24 million, net of
tax) due to currency conversion losses related to the transfer
of cash from the Companys Venezuelan operations.
|
(f)
|
|
Includes (i) a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax) as a result of organizational
realignment plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008
which reduced future cash flow estimates by lowering the
Companys expected VOI sales pace in the future based on
the expectation that access to the asset-backed securities
market will continue to be challenging and (ii) a non-cash
impairment charge of $4 million ($3 million, net of
tax) related to the termination of a development project.
|
(g)
|
|
Includes a net benefit (expense)
related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets of $(3) million,
$7 million, $(1) million and $14 million during
the first, second, third, and fourth quarter, respectively, and
corporate costs of $10 million, $15 million,
$10 million and $10 million during the first, second,
third and fourth quarter, respectively.
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Corporate and
Other
(a)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Corporate and
Other
(a)(c)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(b)
|
|
Includes separation and related
costs of (i) $3 million and $3 million for
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively, during
the first quarter, (ii) $5 million and $2 million
for Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively,
during the second quarter and (iii) $1 million and
$2 million for Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other,
respectively, during the third quarter.
|
(c)
|
|
Includes a net benefit (expense)
related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets of $13 million,
$17 million, $(25) million and $41 million during
the first, second, third, and fourth quarter, respectively, and
corporate costs of $12 million, $11 million,
$14 million and $18 million during the first, second,
third and fourth quarter, respectively.
|
Dividend
Declaration
On February 19, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend of $0.04 per share payable March 13,
2009 to shareholders of record as of February 26, 2009.
F-45
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among Cendant
Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
and Travelport Inc., dated as of July 27, 2006
(incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Separation and Distribution Agreement by
and among Cendant Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc., dated as of
August 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated
by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated December 5, 2006, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form of 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture, dated November 20, 2008, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registrants
Form S-3
filed November 25, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement with Stephen P. Holmes (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 7, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Stephen P.
Holmes, dated December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employment Agreement with Franz S. Hanning (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Franz S.
Hanning, dated December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A. Ballotti, dated as of
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A.
Ballotti, dated December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Employment Agreement with Virginia M. Wilson (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.8*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Virginia M.
Wilson, dated December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Employment Letter with Thomas F. Anderson, dated March 24,
2008
|
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
Amendment to Employment Letter with Thomas F. Anderson, dated
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Employment Agreement with Steven A. Rudnitsky (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.12*
|
|
Termination and Release Agreement with Steven A. Rudnitsky,
dated as of September 8, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
10.15*
|
|
Form of Award Agreement for Stock Appreciation Rights
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Savings Restoration Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.17*
|
|
Amendment Number One to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Savings Restoration Plan, dated December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
First Amendment to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.48 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed March 7, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.20*
|
|
Amendment Number Two to the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Officer Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.22*
|
|
Amendment Number One to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Officer Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Transition Services Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Amendment, executed July 8, 2008 and effective as of
July 28, 2006 to Tax Sharing Agreement, entered into as of
July 28, 2006, by and among Avis Budget Group, Inc.,
Realogy Corporation and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
(incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed August 8, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2006, among Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation, as Borrower, certain financial
institutions as lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent,
Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of Nova Scotia and The Royal
Bank of Scotland PLC, as Documentation Agents, and Credit
Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Co-Documentation Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Form of Declaration of Vacation Owner Program of WorldMark, the
Club (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Management Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1996, by and
between Fairshare Vacation Owners Association and Fairfield
Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Second Amended and Restated FairShare Vacation Plan Use
Management Trust Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2008
by and among Fairshare Vacation Owners Association, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc., Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., such other
subsidiaries and affiliates of Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
and such other unrelated third parties as may from time to time
desire to subject property interests to this
Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants From
10-Q
filed
May 8, 2008)
|
G-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Master Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
August 29, 2002 and Amended and Restated as of July 7,
2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding,
LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master
Servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor to
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of October 30, 2007, to the
Amended and Restated Master Indenture and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of August 29, 2002 and amended and restated as of
July 7, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare Conduit
Receivables Funding, LLC, Wyndham Consumer Finance Inc., as
Master Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and
Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006 by and among Sierra
Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham
Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and U.S. Bank
National Association, successor to Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 13, 2006, to the
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and among
Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer,
Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and U.S.
Bank National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(a) to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Second Amendment, dated as of October 30, 2007, to the
Series 2002-1
Supplement to Master Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of August, 29, 2002 and amended and restated as of July 7,
2006 as amended on November 13, 2006, by and among Sierra
Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham
Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, U.S. Bank National
Association, as Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Bank National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 7,
2008, by and among Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding
II, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Servicer,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 12, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 27,
2004, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, and Fairfield Acceptance
CorporationNevada (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc.), as
Servicer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee,
and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral Agent
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Cendant
Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 dated
August 2, 2004)
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of June 16, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,
and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent, to the
Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 27, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(a) to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 11,
2005, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, Cendant Timeshare Resort
Group-Consumer Finance, Inc. (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc.), as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cendant
Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated August 17, 2005)
|
G-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of June 16, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 11, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 11,
2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2006-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 23,
2007, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2007-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
and as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 25, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 1,
2007, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2007-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2008,
by and among Sierra Timeshare
2008-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 7, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 26,
2008, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2008-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed June 30, 2008)
|
|
|
|
12*
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13(a)-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13(a)-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of the
United States Code
|
* Filed herewith
G-4