UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web sites, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrants were required to submit and post such files).

CMS Energy Corporation : Yes o      No o Consumers Energy Company : Yes o      No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

CMS Energy Corporation :

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company   o

Consumers Energy Company :

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

CMS Energy Corporation : Yes o      No þ Consumers Energy Company : Yes o      No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock at July 29, 2009:

 

 

CMS Energy Corporation
Consumers Energy Company
Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q to the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009

This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by CMS Energy Corporation and Consumers Energy Company. Information in this combined Form 10-Q relating to each individual registrant is filed by such registrant on its own behalf. Consumers Energy Company makes no representation regarding information relating to any other companies affiliated with CMS Energy Corporation other than its own subsidiaries. None of CMS Energy Corporation, CMS Enterprises Company nor any of CMS Energy Corporation’s other subsidiaries (other than Consumers Energy Company) has any obligation in respect of Consumers Energy Company’s debt securities and holders of such securities should not consider the financial resources or results of operations of CMS Energy Corporation, CMS Enterprises Company nor any of CMS Energy Corporation’s subsidiaries (other than Consumers Energy Company and its own subsidiaries (in relevant circumstances)) in making a decision with respect to Consumers Energy Company’s debt securities. Similarly, none of Consumers Energy Company nor any other subsidiary of CMS Energy Corporation has any obligation in respect of debt securities of CMS Energy Corporation.

This report should be read in its entirety. No one section of this report deals with all aspects of the subject matter of this report. This report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and with Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in CMS Energy Corporation’s and Consumers Energy Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (each, the “2008 Form 10-K”).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Glossary			3
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)			31
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)			34
Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)			35
Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)			37
Consumers Energy Company
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)			39
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)			40
Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)			41
Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholder’s Equity (unaudited)			43
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
1. Accounting Policies			46
2. Fair Value Measurements			49
3. Contingencies			54
4. Utility Rate Matters			62
5. Financings and Capitalization			66
6. Earnings Per Share — CMS Energy			69
7. Financial and Derivative Instruments			70
8. Retirement Benefits			74
9. Income Taxes			75
10. Reportable Segments			76

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)

		Page
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-looking Statements and Information			8
Executive Overview			12
Results of Operations			14
Capital Resources and Liquidity			20
Outlook			25
New Accounting Standards			30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			79
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			79
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures			79
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			79
Item 1A. Risk Factors			80
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			81
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			81
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			82
Item 5. Other Information			83
Item 6. Exhibits			84
Signatures			85
EX-3.(a)
EX-12.(a)
EX-12.(b)
EX-31.(a)
EX-31.(b)
EX-31.(c)
EX-31.(d)
EX-32.(a)
EX-32.(b)

(This page intentionally left blank)

CMS Energy Corporation
Consumers Energy Company
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This MD&A is a combined report of CMS Energy and Consumers. It has been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Item 303 of Regulation S-K. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the MD&A contained in CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ 2008 Form 10-K.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION

This Form 10-Q and other written and oral statements that CMS Energy and Consumers make contain forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of “might,” “may,” “could,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” and other similar words is intended to identify forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. This discussion of potential risks and uncertainties is designed to highlight important factors that may impact CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ business and financial outlook. CMS Energy and Consumers have no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements regardless of whether new information, future events, or any other factors affect the information contained in the statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to various factors that could cause CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated in these statements. These factors include CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ inability to predict or control:

	•		the price of CMS Energy Common Stock, capital and financial market conditions, and the effect of these market conditions on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ postretirement benefit plans, interest costs, and access to the capital markets, including availability of financing (including Consumers’ accounts receivable sales program and CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ revolving credit facilities) to CMS Energy, Consumers, or any of their affiliates, and the energy industry;
	•		the impact of the continued downturn in the economy and the sharp downturn and extreme volatility in the financial and credit markets on CMS Energy, Consumers, or any of their affiliates, including their:

	§		revenues;
	§		capital expenditure programs and related earnings growth;
	§		ability to collect accounts receivable from customers;
	§		cost of capital and availability of capital; and
	§		Pension Plan and postretirement benefit plans assets and required contributions;

•

changes in the economic and financial viability of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ suppliers, customers, and other counterparties and the continued ability of these third parties, particularly third parties in bankruptcy, to meet their obligations to CMS Energy and Consumers;

•

population growth or decline in the geographic areas where CMS Energy and Consumers conduct business;

•

changes in applicable laws, rules, regulations, principles or practices, or in their interpretation, including those related to taxes, the environment, and accounting matters, that could have an impact on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses, including the impact of any future regulations or laws regarding:

§

carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions, including potential future legislation to establish a cap and trade system;

	§		mercury emissions;
	§		coal ash;
	§		limitations on the use or construction of coal-fueled electric power plants; and
	§		renewable portfolio standards and energy efficiency mandates;

•

national, regional, and local economic, competitive, and regulatory policies, conditions, and developments;

•

adverse regulatory or legal interpretations or decisions, including those related to environmental laws and regulations, and potential environmental remediation costs associated with these interpretations or decisions, including but not limited to those that may affect Bay Harbor or Consumers’ RMRR classification under NSR regulations;

•

potentially adverse regulatory treatment or failure to receive timely regulatory orders concerning a number of significant matters affecting Consumers that are presently or potentially before the MPSC, including:

§

sufficient and timely recovery of:

	§		Clean Air Act capital and operating costs and other environmental and safety-related expenditures;
	§		power supply and natural gas supply costs;
	§		operating and maintenance expenses;
	§		additional utility rate-based investments;
	§		increased MISO energy and transmission costs;
	§		costs associated with energy efficiency investments and state or federally mandated renewable resource standards; and
	§		Big Rock decommissioning funding shortfalls;

	§		actions of regulators to prevent or curtail shutoffs for non-paying customers;
	§		regulatory orders preventing or curtailing rights to self-implement rate requests;
	§		regulatory orders potentially requiring a refund of previously self-implemented rates;
	§		authorization of a new coal-fueled plant; and
	§		implementation of new energy legislation;

	•		potentially adverse regulatory treatment resulting from pressure on regulators to oppose annual rate increases or to lessen rate impacts upon customers, particularly in difficult economic times;
	•		the ability of Consumers to recover its regulatory assets in full and in a timely manner;
	•		the ability of Consumers to recover nuclear fuel storage costs incurred as a result of the DOE’s failure to accept spent nuclear fuel on schedule, and the outcome of pending litigation with the DOE;
	•		the impact of expanded enforcement powers and investigation activities at the FERC;
	•		federal regulation of electric sales and transmission of electricity, including periodic re-examination by federal regulators of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ market-based sales authorizations in wholesale power markets without price restrictions;
	•		effects of weather conditions, such as unusually cool weather during the summer or warm weather during the winter, on sales;
	•		the market perception of the energy industry or of CMS Energy, Consumers, or any of their affiliates;

	•		the credit ratings of CMS Energy or Consumers;
	•		the impact of credit markets, economic conditions, and new banking regulations on EnerBank;
	•		disruptions in the normal commercial insurance and surety bond markets that may increase costs or reduce traditional insurance coverage, particularly terrorism and sabotage insurance, performance bonds, and tax-exempt debt insurance, and stability of insurance providers;
	•		energy markets, including availability of capacity and the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices for oil, coal, natural gas, natural gas liquids, electricity, and certain related products due to lower or higher demand, shortages, transportation problems, or other developments, and their impact on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ cash flows and working capital;
	•		changes in construction material prices and the availability of qualified construction personnel to implement Consumers’ construction program;
	•		factors affecting operations, such as unusual weather conditions, catastrophic weather-related damage, unscheduled generation outages, maintenance or repairs, environmental incidents, or electric transmission or gas pipeline system constraints;
	•		potential disruption or interruption of facilities or operations due to accidents, war, or terrorism, and the ability to obtain or maintain insurance coverage for these events;
	•		technological developments in energy production, delivery, usage, and storage;
	•		achievement of capital expenditure and operating expense goals;
	•		the impact of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ integrated business software system on their operations, including utility customer billing and collections;
	•		the effectiveness of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ risk management policies and procedures;
	•		CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ ability to achieve generation planning goals and the occurrence and duration of planned or unplanned generation outages;
	•		adverse outcomes regarding tax positions;
	•		adverse consequences resulting from any past or future assertion of indemnity or warranty claims associated with assets and businesses previously owned by CMS Energy or Consumers, including the F.T. Barr matter and claims resulting from attempts by foreign or domestic governments to assess taxes on past operations or transactions;
	•		the outcome, cost, and other effects of legal or administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations, or claims;
	•		earnings volatility resulting from the application of fair value accounting to certain energy commodity contracts, such as electricity sales agreements and interest rate and foreign currency contracts;
	•		changes in financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies, including possible changes to rules involving fair value accounting;

	•		new or revised interpretations of GAAP by regulators, which could affect how accounting principles are applied, and could impact future periods’ financial statements or previously filed financial statements;
	•		a possible future requirement to comply with International Financial Reporting Standards, which differ from GAAP in various ways, including the present lack of special accounting treatment for regulated activities; and
	•		other business or investment matters that may be disclosed from time to time in CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ SEC filings, or in other publicly issued documents.

For additional details regarding these and other uncertainties, see the “Outlook” section included in this MD&A, Note 3, Contingencies, Note 4, Utility Rate Matters, and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

CMS Energy is an energy company operating primarily in Michigan and is the parent holding company of several subsidiaries, including Consumers and Enterprises. Consumers is a combination electric and gas utility company serving Michigan’s Lower Peninsula. Consumers’ electric utility operations include the generation, purchase, distribution, and sale of electricity. Consumers’ gas utility operations include the purchase, transportation, storage, distribution, and sale of natural gas. Consumers’ customer base includes a mix of residential, commercial, and diversified industrial customers. Enterprises, through its equity investments and subsidiaries, is primarily engaged in independent power production.

CMS Energy and Consumers manage their businesses by the nature of services each provides. CMS Energy operates principally in three business segments: electric utility; gas utility; and enterprises, its non-utility investments and operations. Consumers operates principally in two business segments: electric utility and gas utility.

CMS Energy and Consumers earn revenue and generate cash from operations by providing electric and natural gas utility services, electric power generation, gas distribution, transmission and storage, and other energy-related services. Their businesses are affected primarily by:

	•		weather, especially during the heating and cooling seasons;
	•		economic conditions;
	•		regulation and regulatory matters;
	•		energy commodity prices;
	•		interest rates; and
	•		CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ debt credit ratings.

During the past several years, CMS Energy’s business strategy has emphasized improving its consolidated balance sheet and maintaining focus on its core strength, which is Consumers’ utility operations and service.

Consumers’ forecast calls for capital investments in excess of $6 billion from 2009 through 2013, with a key aspect of its strategy being the balanced energy initiative. The balanced energy initiative is a comprehensive energy resource plan to meet Consumers’ projected short-term and long-term electric power requirements with energy efficiency, demand management, expanded use of renewable energy, development of new power plants, and pursuit of additional power purchase agreements to complement existing generating sources.

The 2008 Energy Legislation requires that at least ten percent of Consumers’ electric sales volume come from renewable energy sources by 2015, and includes requirements for specific capacity additions. In compliance with this legislation, Consumers filed a renewable energy plan with the MPSC in February 2009 outlining its plans to build or contract for additional renewable energy capacity of 200 MW by December 31, 2013, and an additional 300 MW of renewable energy capacity by December 31, 2015. Consumers’ plan proposed that half of the new renewable capacity would be obtained through long-term agreements to purchase power from third parties, with the remaining capacity to be supplied by facilities built and owned by Consumers. At the same time, Consumers filed an energy optimization plan, also called for by the 2008 Energy Legislation, under which Consumers will promote energy efficiency and provide incentives to reduce customer usage. Consumers’ filings include a request for recovery of the cost of the renewable energy and energy optimization measures. In May 2009, the MPSC approved the energy optimization plan and, with minor exceptions, the renewable energy plan.

Furthermore, in April 2009, Consumers filed tariff sheets indicating that it planned to self-implement an electric rate increase in the annual amount of $179 million beginning in May 2009. The MPSC issued an

order in May 2009 requiring that, if Consumers self-implemented the $179 million electric rate increase, it must simultaneously refund to customers $36 million of excess proceeds from the April 2007 sale of Palisades. Accordingly, Consumers self-implemented an annual electric rate increase of $179 million, subject to refund with interest, and also implemented a one-time refund of $36 million. Consumers anticipates a final order in this rate filing in November 2009. Additionally, in May 2009, Consumers filed an application with the MPSC seeking an annual increase in gas revenue of $114 million based on an 11 percent authorized return on equity. These rate filings include requests for increases in rates to cover various costs, including capital additions under the balanced energy initiative.

Consumers filed an air permit application with the MDEQ in October 2007 for its proposed new 830 MW coal-fueled plant. Consumers expects the MDEQ to act on the application by the end of the year. Consumers prepared and filed with the MDEQ and the MPSC a needs-and-alternatives analysis that supported Consumers’ current balanced energy initiative and the construction of its proposed power plant.

There is uncertainty associated with federal legislative and regulatory proposals related to the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions, particularly associated with coal-fueled generation. Federal legislation is being considered to establish a cap and trade system, or alternatively, to tax carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, in April 2009, the EPA issued a proposed finding that greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, contribute to air pollution that may endanger the public health and welfare, thus setting the stage for regulation of carbon dioxide emissions under the Clean Air Act. CMS Energy and Consumers are monitoring these developments for potential effects on their plans and operations.

Consumers is developing an advanced metering infrastructure system that will provide enhanced controls over and information about energy usage, as well as timely notification of service interruptions. Consumers is using a phased implementation approach that will allow it to analyze, test, and pilot the new technology prior to widespread investment and deployment. Consumers will also make certain modifications to its software to enable the new system.

In the future, CMS Energy will focus its strategy on:

•

investing in Consumers’ utility system;

•

growing earnings and operating cash flow while controlling operating and fuel costs; and

•

maintaining principles of safe, efficient operations, customer value, fair and timely regulation, and consistent financial performance.

As CMS Energy and Consumers execute this strategy, they will need to overcome a Michigan economy that has been impacted adversely by the continued downturn and uncertainty in Michigan’s automotive industry marked by the bankruptcies of GM and Chrysler. The financial market crisis, the effects of which became evident in a global economic downturn during the fourth quarter of 2008, continues to result in a negative economic outlook. A range of possible outcomes exists due to the uncertain financial market environment and ongoing government policy responses. Consumers expects its annual 2009 weather-adjusted sales to decline by 3.5 percent for the electric utility and five percent for the gas utility and it projects slower growth in the longer term. While CMS Energy and Consumers believe that their sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet their requirements, they continue to monitor developments in the financial and credit markets and government policy responses to those developments for potential implications for CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses and their future financial needs.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009, net income was $74 million, compared with $44 million for 2008. Combined net income for Consumers’ electric and gas utility segments increased, as the impact of MPSC rate orders, a self-implemented rate increase, and a favorable sales mix more than offset lower electric deliveries and increased operating expenses and interest expense. CMS Energy’s consolidated net income was also positively impacted by the expiration of an indemnity obligation related to a 2007 asset sale and a gain on the retirement of debt, which were partially offset by an increase in projected Bay Harbor remediation costs.

Specific after-tax changes to net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30, 2009 versus 2008 are:

						After Tax, In Millions
	•			Increase in electric and gas revenues at Consumers due to MPSC rate orders and a self-implemented rate increase		$	44
	•			Increase from discontinued operations due primarily to a benefit from the expiration of an indemnity obligation			30
	•			Improvement in corporate interest and other due primarily to a gain on the retirement of debt			15
	•			Increase in electric and gas revenues at Consumers due to a favorable sales mix			14
	•			Increase in projected Bay Harbor remediation costs at Enterprises			(22	)
	•			Decrease in electric and gas revenues at Consumers due to decreased deliveries, primarily reflecting unfavorable economic conditions			(21	)
	•			Increase in other net expenses at Consumers, primarily reflecting higher pension and OPEB expenses, higher interest expense, and higher plant maintenance expense			(19	)
	•			Absence of resource conservation savings received in 2008 related to the power purchase agreement with the MCV Partnership			(6	)
	•			Increased maintenance expenses and lower revenues at certain Enterprises plants			(5	)
Total change						$	30

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net income was $143 million, compared with $146 million for 2008. Net income from Consumers’ electric utility segment decreased, reflecting increased seasonal variations associated with a new electric rate design structure, decreased deliveries, the absence of gains from the sale of sulfur dioxide allowances recognized in 2008, and an increase in operating expenses and interest expense. These changes were partially offset by increased earnings from MPSC rate orders, a self-implemented rate increase, and a favorable sales mix. CMS Energy’s consolidated net income was also positively impacted by the expiration of an indemnity obligation related to a 2007 asset sale and a gain on the retirement of debt, which were partially offset by an increase in projected Bay Harbor remediation costs.

Specific after-tax changes to net income available to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus 2008 are:

Electric deliveries and rate increase: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, electric delivery revenues increased by $37 million compared with 2008. The increase primarily resulted from a combined $64 million of additional revenue from the June 2008 MPSC rate order and the May 2009 self-implemented rate increase, including an $11 million increase from a new rate design structure that provides lower winter and higher summer rates to encourage conservation. These variances, together with a $16 million increase in revenues from a favorable sales mix, were partially offset by $30 million in lower deliveries. Deliveries to end-use customers were 8 billion kWh, a decrease of 0.6 billion kWh or 7.0 percent compared with 2008, primarily reflecting unfavorable economic conditions in Michigan. Surcharge revenues decreased by $13 million, due primarily to the absence of $12 million of retirement benefits expense recovered in revenue in 2008.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, electric delivery revenues increased by $36 million compared with 2008. The increase primarily resulted from a combined $70 million of additional revenue from the June 2008 MPSC rate order and the May 2009 self-implemented rate increase, net of a $20 million decrease from a new rate design structure that provides lower winter and higher summer rates to encourage conservation. These variances, together with a $27 million increase in revenues from a favorable sales mix, were partially offset by $48 million in lower deliveries. Deliveries to end-use customers were 17 billion kWh, a decrease of 1 billion kWh or 5.6 percent compared with 2008, primarily reflecting unfavorable economic conditions in Michigan. Surcharge revenues decreased by $13 million, due primarily to the absence of $12 million of retirement benefits expense recovered in revenue in 2008.

Power supply costs and related revenue: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, PSCR and related revenue decreased $1 million compared with 2008, due primarily to a decrease in wholesale fuel recovery revenue.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, PSCR and related revenue increased by $3 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to the absence of a reduction to revenue in 2008 related to amounts excluded from recovery in the 2006 PSCR reconciliation case. The increase was offset partially by a decrease in wholesale fuel recovery revenue.

Other income: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, other income increased by $3 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to proceeds received from a land sale in 2009, partially offset by a decrease in interest income, reflecting lower levels of short-term cash investments.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, other income decreased by $1 million compared with 2008. The decrease was due primarily to lower interest income, reflecting lower levels of short-term cash investments, partially offset by proceeds received from a land sale in 2009.

Maintenance and other operating expenses: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, maintenance and other operating expenses increased $16 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to cost increases for plant maintenance of $8 million, the absence of $9 million of resource conservation savings received in 2008 related to Consumers’ power purchase agreement with the MCV Partnership, and a $4 million increase in uncollectible accounts expense. These increases were partially offset by $5 million of lower pension and OPEB expenses, as the absence of $12 million of expense associated with retirement benefits recovered in revenue in 2008 more than offset the $7 million increase due to market performance of retirement benefit plan assets.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, maintenance and other operating expenses increased $50 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to cost increases for plant maintenance of $14 million, and the absence of an $18 million benefit from the sale of sulfur dioxide credits recognized in 2008. Also contributing to the increase were the absence of $12 million of resource conservation savings received in 2008 related to Consumers’ power purchase agreement with the MCV Partnership, and an increase in other net expenses of $6 million. The increase in other net expenses included $2 million of higher pension and OPEB expenses, as a $14 million increase due to the market performance of retirement benefit plan assets more than offset the absence of $12 million of expense associated with retirement benefits expense recovered in revenue in 2008.

Depreciation and amortization: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $3 million compared with 2008. The decrease was due primarily to a $5 million reduction in amortization expense on certain regulatory assets, partially offset by a $2 million increase from higher plant in service.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, depreciation and amortization expense increased $3 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to a $7 million increase from higher plant in service, offset by $4 million due to the expiration of amortization expense on certain regulatory assets.

General taxes: For the six months ended June 30, 2009, general taxes increased $2 million compared with 2008, due primarily to higher property tax expense, reflecting higher capital spending.

Interest charges: Interest charges increased by $10 million for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2009, due primarily to the issuance of debt in 2009.

Income taxes: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, income taxes increased $7 million compared with 2008, due primarily to higher earnings in the second quarter of 2009.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, income taxes decreased $7 million compared with 2008, due primarily to lower earnings in the first quarter of 2009.

Gas deliveries and rate increase: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, gas delivery revenue increased $6 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to additional revenue of $4 million from the MPSC’s December 2008 gas rate order and $4 million from a favorable sales mix, partially offset by lower deliveries of $2 million reflecting unfavorable economic conditions in Michigan. Gas deliveries, including miscellaneous transportation to end-use customers, were 41 bcf, a decrease of 1.9 bcf or 4.4 percent compared with 2008.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, gas delivery revenue increased $4 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to additional revenue of $11 million from the MPSC’s December 2008 gas rate order and $6 million from a favorable sales mix, largely offset by lower deliveries of $13 million reflecting unfavorable economic conditions in Michigan. Gas deliveries, including miscellaneous transportation to end-use customers, were 172 bcf, a decrease of 8.4 bcf or 4.7 percent compared with 2008.

Gas wholesale and retail services, other gas revenues, and other income: For the six months ended June 30, 2009, gas wholesale and retail services, other gas revenues and other income increased $1 million compared with 2008, due to an increase in appliance service plan program revenue.

Maintenance and other operating expenses: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, maintenance and other operating expenses increased $1 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to a $3 million increase in OPEB expense, reflecting market performance of Consumers’ retirement benefit plan assets, partially offset by a $2 million decrease in uncollectible accounts expense.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, maintenance and other operating expenses increased $14 million compared with 2008. The increase was due primarily to an increase in uncollectible accounts expense of $9 million and higher OPEB expense of $6 million, reflecting market performance of Consumers’ retirement benefit plan assets, partially offset by a $1 million net decrease in other expenses.

Depreciation and amortization: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $2 million compared with 2008. The MPSC’s December 2008 gas rate order reduced amortization expense by $3 million, and delayed collection of an equal amount of amortization in rates. This decrease was partially offset by $1 million of higher depreciation expense due to an increase in plant in service.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $8 million compared with 2008. The MPSC’s December 2008 gas rate order reduced amortization expense by $11 million, and delayed collection of an equal amount of amortization in rates. This decrease was partially offset by $3 million of higher depreciation expense due to an increase in plant in service.

General taxes: For the six months ended June 30, 2009, general taxes increased $1 million, compared with 2008, due primarily to increased property taxes, reflecting higher capital spending.

Interest charges: For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, interest charges increased $1 million compared with 2008, due primarily to the issuance of debt in 2009.

Income taxes: For the three months ended June 30, 2009, income taxes increased $3 million compared with 2008, due primarily to higher earnings in the second quarter of 2009.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, income taxes decreased $3 million compared with 2008. The decrease reflected $1 million due to lower earnings in the first quarter of 2009 and $2 million related to the treatment of property, plant and equipment, as required by MPSC orders.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009, Enterprises recorded a net loss of $17 million, compared with net income of $10 million in 2008. The reduction was due primarily to a $22 million after-tax expense associated with an increase in projected future environmental remediation costs at Bay Harbor. An additional $5 million decrease was related primarily to higher maintenance expense and lower revenues due to outages.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, Enterprises recorded a net loss of $17 million compared with net income of $8 million in 2008. The reduction was due primarily to a $22 million after-tax expense associated with an increase in projected future environmental remediation costs associated with Bay Harbor. An additional $3 million decrease was primarily related to higher maintenance expense.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009, corporate interest and other net expenses decreased $15 million, due primarily to a gain recognized on the retirement of debt, partially offset by higher administrative expenses.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, corporate interest and other net expenses decreased $12 million, due primarily to a gain recognized on the retirement of debt, partially offset by an increase in tax expense due to legislation related to the MBT and higher other operating expenses.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $29 million, compared with a net loss of $1 million in 2008. The improvement was due to the expiration of an indemnity obligation related to a 2007 asset sale.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Components of CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ cash management plan include controlling operating expenses and capital expenditures and evaluating market conditions for financing opportunities, if needed. Recent major financing transactions and commitments are as follows:

•

In March 2009, Consumers issued $500 million in FMB;

•

In June 2009, CMS Energy issued $173 million in convertible senior notes and $300 million in senior notes, and retired $144 million of its $178 million of Long-term debt — related parties;

•

In June 2009, CMS Energy commenced cash tender offers to repurchase up to $330 million of CMS Energy’s senior notes due 2010 and 2011. In July 2009, under the terms of the tender offer, CMS Energy repurchased and retired $233 million principal amount of the senior notes due 2010 and $87 million principal amount of the senior notes due 2011, funded partially by a draw on its revolving credit facility; and

•

In June 2009, CMS Energy’s preferred stock became convertible at the holders’ option for the third quarter of 2009.

Despite the present market volatility, CMS Energy and Consumers expect to continue to have access to the financial and capital markets. Recent and upcoming credit renewals and maturities are as follows:

	•		Consumers’ accounts receivable sales program was renewed in April 2009 through February 2010;
	•		Consumers’ planned renewals of letters of credit and revolving credit facilities are $342 million in 2009 and $500 million in 2012;
	•		Consumers’ FMB maturities are $150 million for the remainder of 2009, $250 million in 2010, and $300 million in 2012;
	•		Consumers’ tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond maturities are $58 million in 2010;
	•		CMS Energy’s senior notes maturities, after reflecting the July 2009 retirements, are $67 million in 2010, $213 million in 2011, and $150 million in 2012; and
	•		CMS Energy’s $550 million revolving credit facility is planned for renewal in 2012.

CMS Energy and Consumers believe that their present level of cash and their expected cash flows from operating activities, together with access to sources of liquidity, will be sufficient to meet cash requirements. In particular, Consumers expects to complete the renewal of its $150 million 364-day revolving credit facility in the third quarter of 2009. If access to the capital markets were to become diminished or otherwise restricted, CMS Energy and Consumers would implement contingency plans to address debt maturities, which could include reduced capital spending. For additional details, see Note 5, Financings and Capitalization.

At June 30, 2009, CMS Energy and Consumers were each in compliance with the financial covenants in their respective debt agreements.

Cash Position, Investing, and Financing

CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ operating, investing, and financing activities meet their consolidated cash needs. At June 30, 2009, CMS Energy had $1.056 billion of consolidated cash and cash equivalents, which includes $31 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents and $11 million of cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated VIEs. At June 30, 2009, Consumers had $760 million of consolidated cash and cash equivalents, which includes $23 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents.

CMS Energy’s primary ongoing source of cash is dividends and other distributions from its subsidiaries. Consumers paid $130 million in common stock dividends and Enterprises paid $55 million in common stock dividends to CMS Energy for the six months ended June 30, 2009. For details on dividend restrictions, see Note 5, Financings and Capitalization.

Operating Activities: For the six months ended June 30, 2009, CMS Energy generated $803 million in cash from operations and Consumers generated $856 million in cash from operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, CMS Energy generated $651 million in cash from operations and Consumers generated $954 million in cash from operations. Specific components of cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are:

CMS Energy, including Consumers

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities at CMS Energy increased $152 million compared with 2008. This increase was due to the absence in 2009 of a payment made by CMS ERM in 2008 to terminate electricity sales agreements, partially offset by changes affecting Consumers’ cash provided by operating activities described in the following paragraph.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities at Consumers decreased $98 million compared with 2008. This decrease was due primarily to a 2009 pension contribution and the absence of 2008 accounts receivable sales. These decreases were partially offset by the impact of lower gas prices on inventory purchased in 2009, collection of increased billings due to recent regulatory actions, and other timing differences.

Investing Activities: For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash used in investing activities was $436 million at CMS Energy and $423 million at Consumers. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used in investing activities was $344 million at CMS Energy and $345 million at Consumers. Specific components of cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are:

CMS Energy, including Consumers

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities at Consumers increased $596 million compared with 2008. This increase was due primarily to an increase in net proceeds from Consumers’ issuance of long-term debt and a stockholder’s contribution from CMS Energy.

For additional details on long-term debt activity, see Note 5, Financings and Capitalization.

Retirement Benefits

The following table provides the most recent estimates of pension cost and pension cash contributions:

Based on recent guidance from the federal Pension Protection Act of 2006, IRS notices, and the federal Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008, CMS Energy reduced its estimated pension contribution for 2009 by $94 million to $206 million. During the first six months of 2009, CMS Energy contributed $206 million to its pension fund, which includes a contribution of $199 million by Consumers. Actual future pension cost and contributions will depend on future investment performance, changes in discount rates, and various other factors related to the Pension Plan participants.

For additional details on retirement benefits, see Note 8, Retirement Benefits.

Obligations And Commitments

Revolving Credit Facilities: For details on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ revolving credit facilities, see Note 5, Financings and Capitalization.

Dividend Restrictions: For details on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ dividend restrictions, see Note 5, Financings and Capitalization.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements: CMS Energy, Consumers, and certain of their subsidiaries enter into various arrangements in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties. These arrangements include indemnifications, surety bonds, letters of credit, and financial and performance guarantees. Indemnifications are usually agreements to reimburse a counterparty that may incur losses due to outside claims or breach of contract terms. The maximum payment that could be required under a number of these indemnity obligations is not estimable. While CMS Energy and Consumers believe it is unlikely that they will incur any material losses related to indemnities they have not recorded as liabilities, they cannot predict the impact of these contingent obligations on their liquidity and financial condition. For additional details on these and other guarantee arrangements, see Note 3, Contingencies, “Guarantees.”

Sale of Accounts Receivable: Under Consumers’ revolving accounts receivable sales program, Consumers may sell up to $250 million of accounts receivable, subject to certain eligibility requirements. At June 30, 2009, $134 million of accounts receivable were eligible for sale, and no accounts receivable were sold under the program.

OUTLOOK

Several business trends and uncertainties may affect CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ financial condition and future results of operations. These trends and uncertainties could have a material impact on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ consolidated income, cash flows, or financial position. For additional details regarding these and other uncertainties, see the “Forward-Looking Statements and Information” section included in this MD&A and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Consumers’ Electric Utility Business Outlook and Uncertainties

Balanced Energy Initiative : Consumers’ balanced energy initiative is a comprehensive energy resource plan designed to meet its projected short-term and long-term electric power requirements through:

	•		energy efficiency;
	•		demand management;
	•		expanded use of renewable energy; and
	•		development of new power plants and pursuit of additional power purchase agreements to complement existing generating sources.

Consumers’ balanced energy initiative includes plans to build an 830 MW coal-fueled plant at its Karn/Weadock generating complex near Bay City, Michigan. Consumers expects the plant to be in operation in 2017 and plans to use five-eighths of the plant’s output to serve its own customers, with the remaining output to be committed to others. The 2008 Energy Legislation provided guidelines with respect to the MPSC’s review and approval of energy resource plans and proposed power plants through the issuance of a certificate of need. Consumers plans to file a new case with the MPSC seeking a certificate of need that conforms to the legislation.

Proposed Coal Plant Projects: In October 2007, Consumers filed an air permit application with the MDEQ for its proposed coal-fueled plant. The MDEQ published Consumers’ draft air permit for public comment in March 2009 and, in response to public comments, indicated that it would require a needs-and-alternatives analysis. In June 2009, Consumers prepared and filed with the MDEQ and the MPSC a needs-and-alternatives analysis that supported Consumers’ current balanced energy initiative and the construction of its proposed coal-fueled power plant. Both the MDEQ and the MPSC published Consumers’ analysis for public comment.

Renewable Energy Plan: The 2008 Energy Legislation prescribed renewable energy standards for energy and capacity. The energy standard requires that at least ten percent of Consumers’ electric sales volume come from renewable sources by 2015 with interim target requirements. Using the guidelines of the standard, four percent of Consumers’ electric sales volume now comes from renewable sources. The capacity standard requires Consumers to add new renewable energy capacity of 200 MW by December 31, 2013, and an additional 300 MW by December 31, 2015, from owned renewable energy sources or agreements to purchase power. Consumers has secured more than 48,000 acres of land easements in Michigan’s Tuscola and Mason Counties for potential wind generation development and is collecting wind speed and other meteorological data at the sites.

In February 2009, Consumers filed its renewable energy plan with the MPSC. The plan detailed how Consumers would meet the renewable energy standards for energy and capacity, with wind generation as Consumers’ primary resource. Consumers’ plan proposed that half of the new renewable capacity would be obtained through long-term agreements to purchase power from third parties, with the remaining capacity to be supplied by facilities built and owned by Consumers. Consumers’ plan was approved by the MPSC in May 2009 with minor exceptions. It is subject to biennial review and annual cost and revenue reconciliation proceedings.

Energy Optimization Plan: The 2008 Energy Legislation requires utilities to prepare energy optimization plans and achieve annual sales reduction targets beginning in 2009 through at least 2015. The targets are incremental with the goal of achieving a six percent reduction in customers’ electricity use and a four percent reduction in natural gas use by December 31, 2015. In February 2009, Consumers filed its energy optimization plan with the MPSC. The plan detailed Consumers’ proposals for energy cost savings among all customer classes through incentives to reduce customer usage by offering customer energy audits, rebates and discounts on purchases of highly efficient appliances, and other incentives and programs. The plan also sought recovery of program costs. Consumers’ plan was approved by the MPSC in May 2009. It is subject to biennial review and annual cost and revenue reconciliation proceedings.

Electric Customer Revenue: Michigan’s economy has suffered from plant closures, restructurings, and bankruptcies in the automotive sector and from the depressed housing market. The Michigan economy also has been harmed by the present volatility in the financial and credit markets. Although Consumers’ electric utility results are not substantially dependent upon a single customer, or even a few customers, customers in the automotive sector and their direct suppliers represented four percent of Consumers’ total 2008 electric revenue and 2.5 percent of Consumers’ 2008 electric operating income.

In the second quarter of 2009, GM and Chrysler each declared bankruptcy. As a result, Consumers has charged off $3 million of accounts receivable and unbilled revenue due from those customers. Chrysler emerged from bankruptcy in June 2009, and GM emerged from bankruptcy in July 2009. Consumers could, however, incur additional charge-offs presently estimated at $7 million in the event that all direct suppliers in the automotive sector and other significant related suppliers were to declare bankruptcy. This estimate does not include the potential indirect impacts on other sectors and customers. Consumers cannot predict the financial impact of the Michigan economy on its electric customer revenue.

Electric Deliveries: Consumers expects weather-adjusted electric deliveries to decrease in 2009 by 3.5 percent compared with 2008. Consumers’ outlook for 2009 includes continuing growth in deliveries to its largest customer, which produces semiconductor and solar energy components. Excluding this customer’s growth, Consumers expects weather-adjusted electric deliveries in 2009 to decrease five percent compared with 2008. Consumers’ outlook reflects reduced deliveries associated with its investment in energy efficiency programs included in the 2008 Energy Legislation, as well as recent projections of Michigan economic conditions.

Beginning in 2010, Consumers expects economic conditions to stabilize, resulting in modestly growing

deliveries of electricity through 2014. This modest growth expectation takes into account the predicted effects of energy efficiency programs. Actual deliveries will depend on:

	•		energy conservation measures and results of energy efficiency programs;
	•		fluctuations in weather; and
	•		changes in economic conditions, including utilization and expansion or contraction of manufacturing facilities, population trends, and housing activity.

Electric Supply Resources: Consumers, through its supply resources, which consist of electric generating plants, long-term power purchase contracts, and short-term purchases of capacity and energy, is planning to meet the resource adequacy requirements established by MISO.

Electric Transmission Expenses: Consumers expects the transmission charges it incurs to increase by $48 million in 2009 compared with 2008, due primarily to a 25 percent increase in METC and Wolverine transmission rates. This increase was included in Consumers’ 2009 PSCR plan filed with the MPSC in September 2008. For details on litigation concerning Consumers’ recovery of its electric transmission expense, see Note 3, Contingencies, “Consumers’ Electric Utility Contingencies — Litigation.”

Electric ROA: The Customer Choice Act allows Consumers’ electric customers to buy electric generation service from Consumers or from an alternative electric supplier. However, the 2008 Energy Legislation generally limits alternative electric supply to ten percent of Consumers’ weather-adjusted retail sales of the preceding calendar year. At June 2009, alternative electric suppliers were providing 443 MW of generation service to ROA customers, a 33 percent increase from December 31, 2008. Alternative electric supply represented four percent of Consumers’ weather-adjusted retail sales of the preceding calendar year.

Electric Environmental Estimates: Consumers’ operations are subject to various state and federal environmental laws and regulations. Generally, Consumers has been able to recover, in customer rates, its costs to operate its facilities in compliance with these laws and regulations.

Clean Air Act: Consumers continues to focus on complying with the federal Clean Air Act and numerous state and federal environmental regulations. Consumers estimates expenditures of $1.36 billion from 2009 through 2017 for equipment installation to comply with a number of environmental regulations, including regulations limiting nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and mercury emissions. Consumers expects to recover these costs in customer rates.

Consumers has applied for early reduction nitrogen oxide allowances with the MDEQ. It is expected that allowances and installation of pollution control equipment will cover the shortfall in nitrogen oxide emission allowances through 2015. If the early reduction nitrogen oxide allowances are granted, no additional purchases of allowances will be necessary. Consumers also plans to purchase sulfur dioxide emission allowances, between 2012 and 2015, at an average cost of $5 million per year. Consumers expects to recover emission allowance costs from its customers through the PSCR process.

Clean Air Interstate Rule: In 2005, the EPA adopted the CAIR, which required additional coal-fueled electric generating plant emission controls for nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide. The CAIR was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The court initially nullified the CAIR and the CAIR federal implementation plan in its entirety, but subsequently, the court changed course and remanded the rule to the EPA maintaining the rule in effect pending EPA revision. At this time, the CAIR remains in effect, with 2009 as the first annual nitrogen oxides compliance year. The EPA must now revise the rule to resolve the court’s concerns. The impacts of this revision are unknown, but stricter regulation is envisioned. A draft rule is expected in 2010.

State and Federal Mercury Air Rules: In 2005, the EPA issued the CAMR, which required initial reductions of mercury emissions from coal-fueled electric generating plants by 2010 and further reductions by 2018. A number of states and other entities appealed certain portions of the CAMR to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. In 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia determined that the rules developed by the EPA were not consistent with the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request to review this decision. The EPA has initiated the development of a revised rule based on MACT. The rule is expected to be proposed in early 2010, at which time Consumers will have a better understanding of the potential impact.

In 2006, Michigan’s governor proposed a plan that would result in mercury emissions reductions of 90 percent by 2015. The MDEQ has proposed a rule in response to this proposal, which is presently undergoing technical review in the state’s Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules. Consumers cannot predict the financial impact or outcome of this matter.

Greenhouse Gases : In June 2009, the United States House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act, which requires reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide. The bill proposes to reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions by 3 percent below 2005 levels by 2012, 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 42 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. The bill also contains provisions for the direct granting of substantial free greenhouse gas emission allowances to load-serving entities in order to mitigate price impacts to customers. Consumers considers it likely that Congress will enact this bill or other greenhouse gas legislation, but the form of any final bill is difficult to predict. These laws, or similar state laws or rules, if enacted, could require Consumers to replace equipment, install additional equipment for emission controls, purchase allowances, curtail operations, arrange for alternative sources of supply, or take other steps to manage or lower the emission of greenhouse gases. In April 2009, the EPA issued a proposed finding that greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, contribute to air pollution that may endanger the public health and welfare. If other administrative actions are taken, such as finalization of the proposed endangerment finding following public comment, it could lead to the regulation of carbon dioxide as a pollutant under the Clean Air Act.

Although associated capital or operating costs relating to greenhouse gas regulation or legislation could be material, and cost recovery cannot be assured, Consumers expects to have an opportunity to recover these costs and capital expenditures in rates consistent with the recovery of other reasonable costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations.

Water: In 2004, the EPA issued rules that govern existing electric generating plant cooling water intake systems. These rules require a significant reduction in the number of fish harmed by intake structures at existing power plants. The EPA compliance options in the rule were challenged before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which remanded the bulk of the rule back to the EPA for reconsideration in 2007. In April 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the utility industry’s position that the EPA can rely on cost-benefit analysis in setting the national performance standards for fish protection. The EPA is planning to issue a revised draft rule in early 2010. Consumers estimates capital expenditures of $150 million to comply with these regulations.

Other electric environmental matters, including routine maintenance classification, could have a major impact on Consumers’ outlook. For additional details on these and other electric environmental matters, see Note 3, Contingencies, “Consumers’ Electric Utility Contingencies - Electric Environmental Matters.”

Electric Rate Matters: Rate matters are critical to Consumers’ electric utility business. For details on Consumers’ stranded cost recovery, power supply cost recovery, electric rate case, Palisades regulatory proceedings, and Big Rock decommissioning proceedings, see Note 4, Utility Rate Matters, “Consumers’ Electric Utility Rate Matters.”

Consumers’ Gas Utility Business Outlook and Uncertainties

Gas Deliveries: Consumers expects weather-adjusted gas deliveries to decline in 2009 by five percent compared with 2008, due to continuing conservation and overall economic conditions in Michigan. In addition, Consumers expects weather-adjusted gas deliveries to decline an average of two percent annually from 2010 through 2014, which reflects expected effects of energy efficiency programs. Actual delivery levels from year to year may vary from this trend due to:

	•		fluctuations in weather;
	•		use by independent power producers;
	•		availability and development of renewable energy sources;
	•		changes in gas prices;
	•		Michigan economic conditions including population trends and housing activity;
	•		the price of competing energy sources or fuels; and
	•		energy efficiency and conservation.

Gas Environmental Estimates: Consumers expects to incur investigation and remedial action costs at a number of sites, including 23 former manufactured gas plant sites. For additional details, see Note 3, Contingencies, “Consumers’ Gas Utility Contingencies — Gas Environmental Matters.”

Gas Rate Matters: Rate matters are critical to Consumers’ gas utility business. For details on Consumers’ gas cost recovery, gas depreciation, gas rate case, and lost and unaccounted for gas, see Note 4, Utility Rate Matters, “Consumers’ Gas Utility Rate Matters.”

Enterprises’ Outlook and Uncertainties

The primary focus with respect to CMS Energy’s remaining non-utility businesses is to optimize cash flow and maximize the value of their assets.

Trends and uncertainties that could have a material impact on CMS Energy’s consolidated income, cash flows, or financial position include:

	•		the impact of indemnity and environmental remediation obligations at Bay Harbor;
	•		the outcome of certain legal proceedings;
	•		the impact of representations, warranties, and indemnities provided by CMS Energy or its subsidiaries in connection with the sales of assets;
	•		the impact of changes in commodity prices and interest rates on certain derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting and must be marked to market through earnings; and
	•		the impact of economic conditions in Michigan, including population trends and housing activity.

For additional details regarding Enterprises’ uncertainties, see Note 3, Contingencies and Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Other Outlook and Uncertainties

Advanced Metering Infrastructure: Consumers’ development of an advanced metering infrastructure system is proceeding as planned. This system is designed to provide two-way communications between Consumers and its customers and should allow Consumers to read meters, receive outage and restoration notification, and turn service on and off without visiting the meter. It should enable customers to monitor and manage their energy usage and help reduce demand during critical peak times, resulting in higher energy efficiency and environmental benefits. Due to this system’s complexity and relative market immaturity, Consumers is using a phased implementation approach that will allow it to analyze, test, and pilot the new technology prior to widespread investment and deployment. Consumers will also make certain modifications to its software to enable the new system. Mass deployment of the system and installation of new meters is planned for 2011.

Litigation: CMS Energy, Consumers, and certain of their subsidiaries are named as a party in various litigation matters, as well as in administrative proceedings before various courts and governmental agencies arising in the ordinary course of business. For additional details regarding these and other legal matters, see Note 3, Contingencies and Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

EnerBank: EnerBank, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Capital that represents one percent of CMS Energy’s net assets, is a state-chartered, FDIC-insured industrial bank providing unsecured home improvement loans. The carrying value of EnerBank’s loan portfolio was $196 million at June 30, 2009. Its loan portfolio was funded primarily by deposit liabilities of $160 million and borrowings from the U.S. Federal Reserve bank of $19 million. Twelve-month rolling average default rates on loans held by EnerBank have risen from 1.4 percent at December 31, 2008 to 2.0 percent at June 30, 2009. Due to the economic downturn, EnerBank expects the level of loan defaults to continue to increase throughout the remainder of 2009 and into 2010, returning to lower levels thereafter.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

For details regarding the implementation of new accounting standards and new accounting standards issued that are not yet effective, see Note 1, Accounting Policies.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

(This page intentionally left blank)

CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

		In Millions
Six Months Ended June 30		2009				2008
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income attributable to CMS Energy		$	149			$	152
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to CMS Energy to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization			294				301
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credit			94				81
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests			3				4
Regulatory return on capital expenditures			(13	)			(16	)
Postretirement benefits expense			91				76
Capital lease and other amortization			19				23
Gain on indemnification			(50	)			—
Gain on sale of assets			(3	)			(8	)
Gain on extinguishment of long-term debt — related parties			(28	)			—
Increase in environmental remediation accrual			35				—
Bad debt expense			34				17
Loss from equity method investees			1				2
Postretirement benefits contributions			(232	)			(25	)
Electric sales contract termination payment			—				(275	)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accounts receivable and accrued revenue			115				187
Decrease in accrued power supply and gas revenue			5				40
Decrease in inventories			267				139
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable			(26	)			3
Decrease in accrued expenses			(7	)			(49	)
Decrease in other current and non-current assets			110				111
Decrease in other current and non-current liabilities			(55	)			(112	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			803				651
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures (excludes assets placed under capital lease)			(412	)			(340	)
Cost to retire property			(25	)			(12	)
Proceeds for sale of assets			7				—
Restricted cash and cash equivalents			6				7
Other investing			(12	)			1
Net cash used in investing activities			(436	)			(344	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt			973				475
Proceeds from EnerBank notes, net			4				7
Issuance of common stock			5				4
Retirement of bonds and other long-term debt, including related parties			(443	)			(550	)
Payment of common stock dividends			(57	)			(41	)
Payment of preferred stock dividends			(6	)			(6	)
Payment of capital and finance lease obligations			(12	)			(12	)
Debt issuance costs, financing fees, and other			(19	)			(5	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			445				(128	)
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents			812				179
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period			213				348
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period		$	1,025			$	527

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.