UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended June 28, 2009.
|
|
|
o
|
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
Commission File Number 0-25150
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
39-1804239
|
|
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
3333 West Good Hope Road, Milwaukee, WI 53209
(Address of principal executive offices)
(414) 247-3333
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
o
Yes
þ
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
o
Yes
þ
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment of this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
þ
|
|
|
|
|
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o
Yes
þ
No
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The aggregate market value of the voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as
of December 28, 2008 (the last business day of the Registrants most recently completed second
quarter), was approximately $38,879,000 (based upon the last reported sale price of the Common
Stock at December 28, 2008, on the NASDAQ Global Market). Shares of common stock held by any
executive officer or director of the registrant have been excluded from this computation because
such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not a
conclusive determination for other purposes.
On August 7, 2009, there were outstanding 3,262,459 shares of the Registrants $.01 par value
Common Stock.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the Form 10-K
|
Document
|
|
into which incorporated
|
Portions of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the
fiscal year ended June 28, 2009
|
|
I, II, IV
|
|
|
|
Portions of the Proxy Statement dated August 28, 2009, for the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 6, 2009.
|
|
III
|
PROSPECTIVE INFORMATION
A number of the matters and subject areas discussed in this Form 10-K as well as in portions of the
Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders and the Companys Proxy Statement, dated August 28,
2009, which are incorporated herein by reference, contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may
be identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as anticipate, believe,
would, expect, intend, may, planned, potential, should, will and could, or the
negative of these terms or words of similar meaning. These statements include matters related to
expected future financial results, product offerings, global expansion, liquidity needs, financing
ability, planned capital expenditures, managements or the Companys expectations and beliefs, and
similar matters discussed in this Form 10-K. The discussions of such matters and subject areas are
qualified by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations generally, and
also may materially differ from the Companys actual future experience.
The Companys business, operations and financial performance are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties, which could result in material differences in actual results from the Companys
current expectations. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general
economic conditions, in particular relating to the automotive industry, the impact on the Company
of the Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corporation bankruptcy filings, customer demand for the
Companys and its customers products, competitive and technological developments, customer
purchasing actions, foreign currency fluctuations, costs of operations and other matters described
under Risk Factors in the Managements Discussion and Analysis section of the Companys 2009
Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference in Part I, Item 1A of this
report and in the Companys other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully
in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are only made as of the
date of this Form 10-K and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update such
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances occurring after the date
of this Form 10-K.
2
PART I
Item 1. Business
The information set forth under Company Description which appears on pages 5 through 12 of the
Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. For information
as to export sales, see the information set forth under Notes to Financial Statements-Export
Sales included on page 43 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
Emerging Technologies
Automotive vehicle access systems, which are both theft deterrent and consumer friendly, are being
developed as electro-mechanical devices. Electronic companies are developing user identification
systems such as bio-systems, card holder (transmitter) systems, etc., while mechanical locks, keys,
housings, and latches are evolving to accommodate the electronics. The Company believes it is
positioning itself as a vehicle access control supplier by building its product, engineering and
manufacturing expertise in the required electro-mechanical products, which include vehicle access
latches, keys with remote entry electronic systems, and housing-ignition systems with passive start
capabilities.
These technologies benefit the Company by increasing the potential customer base as a Tier 2
supplier while attaining Tier 1 status on some product lines and adding additional product line
availability.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
The Companys primary raw materials are high-grade zinc, brass, magnesium, aluminum and plastic
resins. These materials are generally available from a number of suppliers, but the Company has
chosen to concentrate the sourcing with one primary vendor for each commodity. The Company believes
its sources for raw materials are very reliable and adequate for our needs. The Company has not
experienced any significant long term supply problems in its operations and does not anticipate any
significant supply problems in the foreseeable future. See further discussion under Risk
Factors-Sources of and Fluctuations in Market Prices of Raw Materials included on page 23 of the
Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Patents, Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property
The Company believes that the success of its business will not only result from the technical
competence, creativity and marketing abilities of its employees but also from the protection of its
intellectual property through patents, trademarks and copyrights. As part of its ongoing research,
development and manufacturing activities, the Company has a policy of seeking patents on new
products, processes and improvements when appropriate.
Although, in the aggregate, the intellectual property discussed above are of considerable
importance to the manufacturing and marketing of many of its products, the Company does not
consider any single patent or trademark or group of patents or trademarks to be material to its
business as a whole, except for the STRATTEC and STRATTEC with logo trademarks.
The Company also relies upon trade secret protection for its confidential and proprietary
information. The Company maintains confidentiality agreements with its key executives. In addition,
the Company enters into confidentiality agreements with selected suppliers, consultants and
associates as appropriate to evaluate new products or business relationships pertinent to the
success of the Company. However, there can be no assurance that others will not independently
obtain similar information and techniques or otherwise gain access to the Companys trade secrets
or that the Company can effectively protect its trade secrets.
Dependence Upon Significant Customers
A very significant portion of the Companys annual sales are to General Motors Corporation, Delphi
Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and Chrysler LLC (which became Chrysler Group LLC on June 10,
2009). These four customers accounted for approximately 71 percent of the Companys net sales in
2009, 75 percent of the Companys net sales in 2008 and 80 percent of the Companys net sales in
2007. Further information regarding sales to the Companys largest customers is set forth under
the caption Risk Factors - Loss of Significant Customers, Vehicle Content, Vehicle Models and
Market Share and Risk Factors Production Slowdowns for Customers included on page 22 of the
Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders and Notes to Financial Statements-Sales and
Receivable Concentration included on page 43 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders,
both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
3
The products sold to these customers are model specific, fitting only certain defined applications.
Consequently, the Company is highly dependent on its major customers for their business, and on
these customers ability to produce and sell vehicles which utilize the Companys products. The
Company has enjoyed good relationships with General Motors Corporation, Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor
Company, Delphi Corporation and other customers in the past, and expects to do so in the future.
However, a significant change in the purchasing practices of, or a significant loss of volume from,
one or more of these customers could have a detrimental effect on the Companys financial
performance.
During fiscal year 2009, the Companys major customers, Chrysler LLC, General Motors Corporation
and Ford Motor Company presented long-term viability plans to the United States Government. These
plans focused on reducing North American production capacity, closing facilities, eliminating
certain vehicle models, brands and overall structural costs to operate profitably at a 10 million
vehicle production build level in North America. The above customers have taken steps to implement
these plans over the next couple of years. The overall expectation is that North American vehicle
build schedules will rebound from the historical 27 year low experienced in 2009, but will not
reach the previous production build levels of 15-16 million vehicles per year during the next 5
years.
The Companys financial results for the year ended June 28, 2009 reflect the overall weakness in
the U.S. economy, and in particular the sharp decline in vehicle sales and production during the
year. During the quarter ended June 28, 2009, the Companys two largest customers, Chrysler LLC
and General Motors Corporation, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for their U.S. legal
entities. Chryslers filing occurred on April 30, 2009, and General Motors filed on June 1, 2009.
Within days of its filing, Chrysler took the unusual step of shutting down all of its North
American manufacturing facilities during May and June 2009. This development was on top of
previously announced General Motors plant shutdowns idling a significant amount of its North
American plant capacity for the purpose of reducing its retail inventory of new vehicles. May and
June of 2009 were therefore extremely slow sales months for the Company, each nearly 45 percent
below the Companys April 2009 sales levels. This slowness extended into July, the first month of
the Companys fiscal 2010 year.
Sales
and Marketing
The Company provides its customers with engineered locksets, steering column lock housings,
seatback and secondary latches, power sliding door systems, power liftgate systems, power decklids
and other access products which are unique to specific vehicles. Any given vehicle will typically
take 1 to 3 years of development and engineering design time prior to being offered to the public.
The locksets, lock housings, power liftgates, power sliding door and other power access systems,
and latches are designed concurrently with the vehicle. Therefore, commitment to the Company as the
production source occurs 1 to 3 years prior to the start of production. The Company employs an
engineering staff that assists in providing design and technical solutions to its customers. The
Company believes that its engineering expertise is a competitive advantage and contributes toward
its strong market position. For example, the Company believes it regularly provides innovative
design proposals for its product offerings to its customers that will improve customer access,
vehicle security system quality, theft deterrence and system cost.
The typical process used by automotive manufacturers in selecting a lock, lock housing, power
liftgate, power sliding door and other power access systems, or latch supplier is to offer the
business opportunity to the Company and several of the Companys competitors. Each competitor will
pursue the opportunity, doing its best to provide the customer with the most attractive proposal.
Price pressure is strong during this process but once an agreement is reached, a commitment is made
for each year of the product program. Typically, price reductions resulting from productivity
improvement by the Company are included in the contract and are estimated in evaluating each of
these opportunities by the Company. A blanket purchase order, a contract indicating a specified
part will be supplied at a specified price during a defined time period, is issued by customers for
each model year. Production quantity releases or quantity commitments are made to that purchase
order for weekly deliveries to the customer. As a consequence and because the Company is a
Just-in-Time supplier to the automotive industry, it does not maintain a backlog of orders in the
classic sense for future production and shipment.
4
Competition
The Company competes with domestic and foreign-based competitors on the basis of custom product
design, engineering support, quality, delivery and price. While the number of direct competitors
is currently relatively small, the automotive manufacturers actively encourage competition between
potential suppliers. The Company has a large share of the North American market for its lock and
key, housing, power liftgate, power sliding door, and latch products because of its ability to
provide optimal value, which is a beneficial combination of price, quality, technical support,
program management, innovation and aftermarket support. In order to reduce lockset or housing,
power liftgate, power sliding door, and latch product production costs while still offering a wide
range of technical support, the Company utilizes assembly operations and certain light
manufacturing operations in Mexico, which results in lower labor costs as compared to the United
States.
As locks become more sophisticated and involve additional electronics, competitors with specific
electronic expertise may emerge to challenge the Company. To address this, the Company has
strengthened its electrical engineering knowledge and service. It is also working with several
electronics suppliers to jointly develop and supply these advanced products.
The Companys lockset, housing and power access competitors include Huf North America,
Ushin-Ortech, Tokai-Rika, Alpha-Tech, Valeo, Honda Lock, Methode, Shin Chang, Magna, Edscha,
Stabilus, Aisin, Brose, Mitsuba, Ohi, Kiekert, Inteva and Gecom. For additional information related
to competition, see the information set forth under Risk Factors-Highly Competitive Automotive
Supply Industry included on page 24 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
Research and Development
The Company engages in research and development activities pertinent to automotive access control.
A major area of focus for research is the expanding role of vehicle access via electronic
interlocks and modes of communicating authorization data between consumers and vehicles.
Development activities include new products, applications and product performance improvements. In
addition, specialized data collection equipment is developed to facilitate increased product
development efficiency and continuous quality improvements. For fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007,
the Company spent approximately $1.9 million, $1.9 million, and $2.2 million, respectively, on
research and development. The Company believes that, historically, it has committed sufficient
resources to research and development and will continue to invest in the future as required to
support additional product programs associated with both existing and new customers. Patents are
pursued and will continue to be pursued as appropriate to protect the Companys interests resulting
from these activities.
Customer Tooling
The Company incurs costs related to tooling used in component production and assembly. Some of
these costs are reimbursed by customers who then own the tools involved. See the information set
forth under Notes to Financial Statements-Customer Tooling in Progress included on page 31 of the
Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Environmental Compliance
As is the case with other manufacturers, the Company is subject to Federal, state, local and
foreign laws and other legal requirements relating to the generation, storage, transport, treatment
and disposal of materials as a result of its manufacturing and assembly operations. These laws
include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (as amended), the Clean Air Act (as amended),
the Clean Water Act of 1990 (as amended) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (as amended). The Company has an environmental management system that is
ISO-14001 certified. The Company believes that its existing environmental management system is
adequate and it has no current plans for substantial capital expenditures in the environmental
area.
As discussed in Notes to Financial Statements-Commitments and Contingencies included on page
37 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference,
a site at the Companys Milwaukee facility is contaminated by a solvent spill from a former
above-ground solvent storage tank located on the east side of the facility, which occurred in 1985.
This situation is being monitored by the Company.
The Company does not currently anticipate any materially adverse impact on its financial
statements or competitive position as a result of compliance with Federal, state, local and foreign
environmental laws or other legal requirements. However, risk of environmental liability and
charges associated with maintaining compliance with environmental laws is inherent in the nature of
the Companys business and there is no assurance that material liabilities or charges could not
arise.
5
Employees
At June 28, 2009, the Company had approximately 1,655 full-time employees, of which
approximately 210 or 12.7 percent were represented by a labor union, which accounts for all
production associates at the Companys Milwaukee facility. In June 2008, a new contract with the
unionized associates was ratified and is effective through June 30, 2012. During June 2001, there
was a 16-day strike by the represented employees at the Companys Milwaukee facility. Further
information regarding the strike, work stoppages and other labor matters are discussed under Risk
Factors-Disruptions Due to Work Stoppages and Other labor Matters included on pages 23 and 24 of
the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Available Information
The Company maintains its corporate website at www.strattec.com and makes available, free of
charge, through this website its code of business ethics, annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports that the Company
files with, or furnishes to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) as soon as
reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it
to, the Commission. The Company is not including all the information contained on or available
through its website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. However, this report includes (or incorporates by reference) all material
information about the Company that is included on the Companys website which is otherwise required
to be included in this report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The information set forth under Risk Factors which appears on pages 22 through 24 of the
Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. The risks
described in the section Risk Factors in the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders are not
the only risks the Company faces. Additional risks that the Company does not yet know of or that
it currently thinks are immaterial may also impair its business operations. If any of the events
or circumstances described in those risks actually occur, the Companys business, financial
condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such cases, the
trading price of the Companys common stock could decline.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
The Company has three manufacturing plants, one warehouse, and a sales office. These
facilities are described as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Type
|
|
|
Sq. Ft.
|
|
|
Owned or Leased
|
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
|
|
Headquarters and General Offices; Component
Manufacturing and Service Parts Distribution
|
|
|
352,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Juarez, Chihuahua Mexico
|
|
Subsidiary Offices and Assembly
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Juarez, Chihuahua Mexico
|
|
Subsidiary Offices, Key Finishing, Injection
Molding and Assembly Operations
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
El Paso, Texas
|
|
Finished Goods Warehouse
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
**
|
Troy, Michigan
|
|
Sales and Engineering Office for Detroit Customer Area
|
|
|
18,900
|
|
|
Leased
|
**
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Leased unit within a complex.
|
The Company believes that its production facilities will be adequate for the foreseeable future.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business the Company may be involved in various legal proceedings from
time to time. The Company does not believe it is currently involved in any claim or action the
ultimate disposition of which would have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
statements.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to a vote of shareholders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
6
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program on October 16, 1996, and the
program was publicly announced on October 17, 1996. The Board of Directors has periodically
increased the number of shares authorized for repurchase under the program. At June 28, 2009, the
number of shares of the Companys common stock authorized for repurchase under the program totaled
3,839,395. The program currently authorizes the repurchase of the Companys common stock from time
to time, directly or through brokers or agents, and has no expiration date. Over the life of the
repurchase program through June 28, 2009, a total of 3,655,322 shares have been repurchased at a
cost of approximately $136.4 million. No shares were repurchased during the quarter ended June 28,
2009.
The Companys common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol STRT.
The
information set forth under Financial Summary Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
included on page 47 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The information set forth under Five Year Financial Summary which appears on page 47 of the
Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. Such
information should be read along with the Companys financial statements and the notes to those
financial statements and with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations incorporated by reference elsewhere herein.
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The information set forth under Managements Discussion and Analysis which appears on pages 13
through 24 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company did not hold any market risk sensitive instruments during the period covered by this
report.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements, together with the report thereon of Grant Thornton LLP dated August 24,
2009, the report of management on internal control over financial reporting and the report of Grant
Thornton LLP on internal control over financial reporting dated August 24, 2009, which appear on
pages 25 through 46 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated herein by
reference.
Our quarterly results of operations included under Financial Summary-Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited) which appears on page 47 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
7
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Commissions rules and forms, and that the information required to be disclosed by
the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
accumulated and communicated to its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The
Company carried out an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as the end of the period covered by this report at reaching a level of
reasonable assurance. It should be noted that in designing and evaluating the disclosure controls
and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives,
and management was necessarily required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company has designed its disclosure controls
and procedures to reach a level of reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives.
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 28,
2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
The report of management required under this Item 9A is included on page 44 of the Companys 2009
Annual Report to Shareholders under the heading Report on Managements Assessment of Internal
Control over Financial Reporting and is incorporated herein by reference.
The attestation report required under this Item 9A is included on page 45 of the Companys 2009
Annual Report to Shareholders under the heading Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
8
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information included in the Companys Proxy Statement, dated August 28, 2009, under Proposal:
Election of Directors, Corporate Governance Matters-Code of Business Ethics, Audit Committee
Matters-Audit Committee Financial Expert, Executive Officers, Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance, and Corporate Governance Matters-Director Nominations is
incorporated herein by reference.
The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors is an audit committee for purposes of
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the Audit Committee
consist of four outside independent Directors, Michael J. Koss, Audit Committee Chairman, Robert
Feitler, Frank J. Krejci and David R. Zimmer.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information included in the Companys Proxy Statement, dated August 28, 2009, under Director
Compensation and Executive Compensation is incorporated herein by reference.
The information incorporated by reference from Report of Compensation Committee in the Companys
Proxy Statement, dated August 28, 2009, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters
The information included in the Companys Proxy Statement, dated August 28, 2009, under Security
Ownership is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes share information, as of June 28, 2009, for the Companys Stock
Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
common shares to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common shares
|
|
|
|
issued upon exercise
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
available for future
|
|
|
|
of outstanding
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
issuance under
|
|
|
|
options,
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
equity
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
warrants, and rights
|
|
|
warrants, and rights
|
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
shareholders
|
|
|
187,780
|
|
|
$
|
58.74
|
|
|
|
380,463
|
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
187,780
|
|
|
$
|
58.74
|
|
|
|
380,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information included in the Companys Proxy Statement, dated August 28, 2009, under
Transactions With Related Persons and Corporate Governance Matters-Director Independence is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information included in the Companys Proxy Statement, dated August 28, 2009, under Audit
Committee Matters-Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm is incorporated herein by
reference.
9
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a)
|
|
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
|
|
(1)(i)
|
|
Financial Statements
- The following financial statements of the Company,
included on pages 25 through 46 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders,
are incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this Form 10-K annual
report:
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets - as of June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations - years ended June 28, 2009, June 29, 2008 and July 1,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity - years ended June 28, 2009, June
29, 2008 and July 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - years ended June 28, 2009, June 29, 2008 and
July 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
(2)
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule
|
|
|
|
All schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required, or
because the required information has been included in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Exhibits. See Exhibit Index beginning on page 12.
|
|
|
|
See Exhibit Index and the exhibits attached hereto or previously filed as described in
the Exhibit Index beginning on page 12.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
10
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
|
|
Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Date: August 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant
to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
/s/ Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive
|
|
August 28, 2009
|
Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 18, 2009
|
Frank J. Krejci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 18, 2009
|
Michael J. Koss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 18, 2009
|
Robert Feitler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 18, 2009
|
David R. Zimmer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|
|
August 28, 2009
|
Patrick J. Hansen
|
|
Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
11
EXHIBIT INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
(9)
|
|
By-laws of the Company
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
(13)
|
|
|
Promissory
Note dated November 1, 2008 by and between the Company and M&I Bank
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
(9) **
|
|
Amended STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
(9) **
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
(3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (11)**
|
|
Employment Agreements between the Company and the identified executive officers
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
(1) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (11)**
|
|
Change In Control Agreements between the Company
and the identified executive officers
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
(12) **
|
|
Amended STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION Economic Value Added Plan for
Executive Officers and Senior Managers
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
(12) **
|
|
Amended STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION Economic Value Added Plan for
Non-employee Members of the Board of Directors
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
(10) **
|
|
Amended STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Richard P. Messina dated as of
December 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
Change In Control Agreement between the Company and Richard P. Messina
dated as of December 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended June 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Letter Regarding Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated August 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification for Harold M. Stratton II, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification for Patrick J. Hansen, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
(14)
|
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Previously filed
|
|
**
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10 filed on January 20,
1995.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 2 to the Form 10 filed on February 6,
1995.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the June 27, 1999 Form 10-K filed on September
17, 1999.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the July 1, 2001 Form 10-K filed on September 4,
2001.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the June 30, 2002 Form 10-K filed on August 28,
2002.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the June 29, 2003 Form 10-K filed on August 28,
2003.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the September 26, 2004 Form 10-Q filed on
November 2, 2004.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the March 27, 2005 Form 10-Q filed on April 29,
2005.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2005.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the January 1, 2006 Form 10-Q filed on February
7, 2006.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the April 1, 2007 Form 10-Q filed on May 8,
2007.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the July 1, 2007 Form 10-K filed on August 30,
2007.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the September 30, 2008
Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2008.
|
|
(14)
|
|
This certification is not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
12
Exhibit 10.9
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT by and between STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation (the
Company) and Richard Messina (the Executive), dated as of the 1st day of December, 2008.
The Board of Directors of the Company (the Board), has determined that it is in the best
interests of the Company and its shareholders to assure that the Company will have the continued
dedication of the Executive, notwithstanding the possibility, threat or occurrence of a Change of
Control (as defined below) of the Company. The Board believes it is imperative to diminish the
inevitable distraction of the Executive by virtue of the personal uncertainties and risks created
by a pending or threatened Change of Control and to encourage the Executives full attention and
dedication to the Company currently and in the event of any threatened or pending Change of
Control, and to provide the Executive with compensation and benefits arrangements upon a Change of
Control which ensure that the compensation and benefits expectations of the Executive will be
satisfied and which are competitive with those of other corporations. Therefore, in order to
accomplish these objectives, the Board has caused the Company to enter into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1.
Certain Definitions
.
(a) The Effective Date shall mean the first date during the Change of Control Period (as
defined in Section l(b)) on which a Change of Control (as defined in Section 2) occurs. Anything
in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if a Change of Control occurs and if the
Executives employment with the Company or this Agreement is terminated prior to the date on which
the Change of Control occurs, and if it is reasonably demonstrated by the Executive that such
termination of employment or of this Agreement (i) was at the request of a third party who has
taken steps reasonably calculated to effect a Change of Control or (ii) otherwise arose in
connection with or anticipation of a Change of Control, then for all purposes of this Agreement the
Effective Date shall mean the date immediately prior to the date of such termination of
employment or purported termination of this Agreement.
(b) The Change of Control Period shall mean the period commencing on the date hereof and
ending on the third anniversary of the date hereof; provided, however, that commencing on the date
one year after the date hereof, and on each annual anniversary of such date (such date and each
annual anniversary thereof shall be hereinafter referred to as the Renewal Date), unless
previously terminated, the Change of Control Period shall be automatically extended so as to
terminate three years from such Renewal Date, unless at least 60 days prior to the Renewal Date the
Company shall give notice to the Executive that the Change of Control Period shall not be so
extended.
2.
Change of Control
. For the purpose of this Agreement, a Change of Control shall
mean:
(a) The acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3)
or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) (a Person)
of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of
20% or more of either (i) the then outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (the
Outstanding Company Common Stock) or (ii) the combined voting power of the then outstanding
voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the
Outstanding Company Voting Securities); provided, however, that the following acquisitions shall
not constitute a Change of Control: (i) any acquisition directly from the Company, (ii) any
acquisition by the Company, (iii) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust)
sponsored or maintained by the Company or any corporation controlled by the Company or (iv) any
acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a transaction which complies with clauses (i), (ii) and
(iii) of subsection (c) of this Section 2; or
(b) Individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board (the Incumbent Board) cease
for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any
individual becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or nomination for
election by the Companys shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the
directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a
member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial
assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to
the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or
consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board; or
(c) Approval by the shareholders of the Company of a reorganization, merger or consolidation
(a Business Combination), in each case, unless, following such Business Combination, (i) all or
substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of
the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to
such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 60% of, respectively,
the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding
voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of
the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, a
corporation which as a result of such transaction owns the Company through one or more
subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such
Business Combination of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting
Securities, as the case may be, (ii) no Person (excluding any employee benefit plan (or related
trust) of the Company or such corporation resulting from such Business Combination) beneficially
owns, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of, respectively, the then
2
outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or
the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation except to
the extent that such ownership existed prior to the Business Combination and (iii) at least a
majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business
Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial
agreement, or of the action of the Board, providing for such Business Combination; or
(d) Approval by the shareholders of the Company of (i) a complete liquidation or dissolution
of the Company or (ii) the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of
the Company, other than to a corporation, with respect to which following such sale or other
disposition, [a] more than 60% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock of
such corporation and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such
corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors is then beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, by all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the
beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and outstanding Company
Voting Securities immediately prior to such sale or other disposition in substantially the same
proportion as their ownership, immediately prior to such sale or other disposition, of the
Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be, [b]
less than 20% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock of such corporation and
the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors is then beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by
any Person (excluding any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or such
corporation), except to the extent that such Person owned 20% or more of the Outstanding Company
Common Stock or Outstanding Company Voting Securities prior to the sale or disposition, and [c] at
least a majority of the members of the board of directors of such corporation were members of the
Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the
Board, providing for such sale or other disposition of assets of the Company or were elected,
appointed or nominated by the Board.
3.
Employment Period
. The Company hereby agrees to continue the Executive in its
employ, and the Executive hereby agrees to remain in the employ of the Company subject to the terms
and conditions of this Agreement, for the period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on the
third anniversary of such date (the Employment Period).
4.
Terms of Employment
.
(a)
Position and Duties
.
(i) During the Employment Period, [a] the Executives position (including status, offices,
titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties and responsibilities shall be at least
commensurate in all material respects with the most
3
significant of those held, exercised and assigned at any time during the 120-day period immediately
preceding the Effective Date and [b] the Executives services shall be performed at the location
where the Executive was employed immediately preceding the Effective Date or any office or location
less than 35 miles from such location.
(ii) During the Employment Period, and excluding any periods of vacation and sick leave to
which the Executive is entitled, the Executive agrees to devote reasonable attention and time
during normal business hours to the business and affairs of the Company and, to the extent
necessary to discharge the responsibilities assigned to the Executive hereunder, to use the
Executives reasonable best efforts to perform faithfully and efficiently such responsibilities.
During the Employment Period it shall not be a violation of this Agreement for the Executive to [a]
serve on corporate, civic or charitable boards or committees, [b] deliver lectures, fulfill
speaking engagements or teach at educational institutions and [c] manage personal investments, so
long as such activities do not significantly interfere with the performance of the Executives
responsibilities as an employee of the Company in accordance with this Agreement. It is expressly
understood and agreed that to the extent that any such activities have been conducted by the
Executive prior to the Effective Date, the continued conduct of such activities (or the conduct of
activities similar in nature and scope thereto) subsequent to the Effective Date shall not
thereafter be deemed to interfere with the performance of the Executives responsibilities to the
Company.
(b)
Compensation
.
(i)
Base Salary
. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall receive an annual
base salary (Annual Base Salary), which shall be paid at a monthly rate, at least equal to twelve
times the highest monthly base salary paid or payable, including any base salary which has been
earned but deferred, to the Executive by the Company and its affiliated companies in respect of the
12-month period immediately preceding the month in which the Effective Date occurs. During the
Employment Period, the Annual Base Salary shall be reviewed no more than 12 months after the last
salary increase awarded to the Executive prior to the Effective Date and thereafter at least
annually and shall be first increased no more than 12 months after the last salary increase awarded
to the Executive prior to the Effective Date and thereafter at least annually by the higher of (x)
the average increase (excluding promotional increases) in base salary awarded to the Executive for
each of the three full fiscal years (annualized in the case of any fiscal year consisting of less
than twelve full months or during which the Executive was employed for less than twelve months)
prior to the Effective Date, and (y) the percentage increase (excluding promotional increases) in
base salary generally awarded to peer executives of the Company and its affiliated companies for
the year of determination. Any increase in Annual Base Salary shall not serve to limit or reduce
any other obligation to the Executive under this Agreement. Annual Base Salary shall not be
reduced after any such increase and the term Annual Base Salary as utilized in this Agreement shall
refer to Annual Base Salary as so increased. As used in this Agreement, the term affiliated
companies shall include any company controlled by, controlling or under common control with the
Company.
4
(ii)
Annual Bonus
. In addition to Annual Base Salary, the Executive shall be awarded,
for each fiscal year ending during the Employment Period, an annual bonus (the Annual Bonus) in
cash at least equal to the higher of (x) the average of the three highest bonuses paid or payable,
including any bonus or portion thereof which has been earned but deferred, to the Executive by the
Company and its affiliated companies in respect of the five fiscal years (or such shorter period
during which the Executive has been employed by the Company) immediately preceding the fiscal year
in which the Effective Date occurs (annualized for any fiscal year during such period consisting of
less than twelve full months or with respect to which the Executive has been employed by the
Company for less than twelve full months) and (y) the bonus paid or payable (annualized as
described above), including any bonus or portion thereof which has been earned but deferred, to the
Executive by the Company and its affiliated companies in respect of the most recently completed
fiscal year prior to the Effective Date (such higher amount being referred to as the Recent Annual
Bonus). Each such Annual Bonus shall be paid no later than the end of the third month of the
fiscal year next following the fiscal year for which the Annual Bonus is awarded, unless the
Executive shall elect to defer the receipt of such Annual Bonus.
(iii)
Incentive, Savings and Retirement Plans
. During the Employment Period, the
Executive shall be entitled to participate in all incentive, savings and retirement plans,
practices, policies and programs applicable generally to other peer executives of the Company and
its affiliated companies, but in no event shall such plans, practices, policies and programs
provide the Executive with incentive opportunities (measured with respect to both regular and
special incentive opportunities, to the extent, if any, that such distinction is applicable),
savings opportunities and retirement benefit opportunities, in each case, less favorable, in the
aggregate, than the most favorable of those provided by the Company and its affiliated companies
for the Executive under such plans, practices, policies and programs as in effect at any time
during the 120-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date or if more favorable to the
Executive, those provided generally at any time after the Effective Date to other peer executives
of the Company and its affiliated companies.
(iv)
Welfare Benefit Plans
. During the Employment Period, the Executive and/or the
Executives family, as the case may be, shall be eligible for participation in and shall receive
all benefits under welfare benefit plans, practices, policies and programs provided by the Company
and its affiliated companies (including, without limitation, medical, prescription, dental,
disability, salary continuance, employee life, group life, accidental death and travel accident
insurance plans and programs) to the extent applicable generally to other peer executives of the
Company and its affiliated companies, but in no event shall such plans, practices, policies and
programs provide the Executive with benefits which are less favorable, in the aggregate, than the
most favorable of such plans, practices, policies and programs in effect for the Executive at any
time during the 120-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date or, if more favorable to
the Executive, those provided generally at any time after the Effective Date to other peer
executives of the Company and its affiliated companies.
5
(v)
Expenses
. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to
receive prompt reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred by the Executive in accordance
with the most favorable policies, practices and procedures of the Company and the affiliated
companies in effect for the Executive at any time during the 120-day period immediately preceding
the Effective Date or, if more favorable to the Executive, as in effect generally at any time
thereafter with respect to other peer executives of the Company and its affiliated companies.
(vi)
Fringe Benefits
. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled
to fringe benefits, including, without limitation, tax and financial planning services, payment of
club dues, and, if applicable, use of automobile and payment of related expenses, in accordance
with the most favorable plans, practices, programs and policies of the Company and its affiliated
companies in effect for the Executive at any time during the 120-day period immediately preceding
the Effective Date or, if more favorable to the Executive, as in effect generally at any time
thereafter with respect to other peer executives of the Company and its affiliated companies.
(vii)
Office and Support Staff
. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be
entitled to an office or offices of a size and with furnishings and other appointments, and to
exclusive personal secretarial and other assistance, at least equal to the most favorable of the
foregoing provided to the Executive by the Company and its affiliated companies at any time during
the 120-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date or, if more favorable to the Executive,
as provided generally at any time thereafter with respect to other peer executives of the Company
and its affiliated companies.
(viii)
Vacation
. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to
paid vacation in accordance with the most favorable plans, policies, programs and practices of the
Company and its affiliated companies as in effect for the Executive at any time during the 120-day
period immediately preceding the Effective Date or, if more favorable to the Executive, as in
effect generally at any time thereafter with respect to other peer executives of the Company and
its affiliated companies.
5.
Termination of Employment
.
(a)
Death or Disability
. The Executives employment shall terminate automatically
upon the Executives death during the Employment Period. If the Company determines in good faith
that the Disability of the Executive has occurred during the Employment Period (pursuant to the
definition of Disability set forth below), it may give to the Executive written notice in
accordance with Section 12(b) of this Agreement of its intention to terminate the Executives
employment. In such event, the Executives employment with the Company shall terminate effective
on the 30th day after receipt of such notice by the Executive (the Disability Effective Date),
provided that, within the 30 days after such receipt, the Executive shall not have returned to
full-time
6
performance of the Executives duties. For purposes of this Agreement, Disability shall mean the
absence of the Executive from the Executives duties with the Company on a full-time basis for 180
consecutive business days as a result of incapacity due to mental or physical illness which is
determined to be total and permanent by a physician selected by the Company or its insurers and
acceptable to the Executive or the Executives legal representative (such agreement as to
acceptability not to be withheld unreasonably).
(b)
Cause
. The Company may terminate the Executives employment during the Employment
Period for Cause. For the sole and exclusive purposes of this Agreement, Cause shall mean:
(i) The willful and continued failure of the Executive to perform substantially the
Executives duties with the Company or one of its affiliates (other than any such failure resulting
from incapacity due to physical or mental illness), after a written demand for substantial
performance is delivered to the Executive by the Board or the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company which specifically identifies the manner in which the Board or Chief Executive Officer
believes that the Executive has not substantially performed the Executives duties, or
(ii) The willful engaging by the Executive in illegal conduct or gross misconduct which is
materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company.
For purposes of this provision, no act or failure to act, on the part of the Executive, shall be
considered willful unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in bad faith or
without reasonable belief that the Executives action or omission was in the best interests of the
Company. Any act, or failure to act, based upon authority given pursuant to a resolution duly
adopted by the Board or upon the instructions of the Chief Executive Officer or a senior officer of
the Company or based upon the advice of counsel for the Company shall be conclusively presumed to
be done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in good faith and in the best interests of the
Company. The cessation of employment of the Executive shall not be deemed to be for Cause unless
and until there shall have been delivered to the Executive a copy of a resolution duly adopted by
the affirmative vote of not less than three-quarters of the entire membership of the Board at a
meeting of the Board called and held for such purpose (after reasonable notice is provided to the
Executive and the Executive is given an opportunity, together with counsel, to be heard before the
Board), finding that, in the good faith opinion of the Board, the Executive is guilty of the
conduct described in subparagraph (i) or (ii) above, and specifying the particulars thereof in
detail.
(c)
Good Reason
. The Executives employment may be terminated by the Executive for
Good Reason. For the sole and exclusive purposes of this Agreement, Good Reason shall mean:
(i) The assignment to the Executive of any duties inconsistent in any respect with the
Executives position (including status, offices, titles
7
and reporting requirements), authority, duties or responsibilities as contemplated by Section 4(a)
of this Agreement, or any other action by the Company which results in a diminution in such
position, authority, duties or responsibilities, excluding for this purpose an isolated,
insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company
promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the Executive;
(ii) Any failure by the Company to comply with any of the provisions of Section 4(b) of this
Agreement, other than an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent failure not occurring in bad faith
and which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the
Executive;
(iii) The Companys requiring the Executive to be based at any office or location other than
as provided in Section 4(a)(i)(b) hereof or the Companys requiring the Executive to travel on
Company business to a substantially greater extent than required immediately prior to the Effective
Date;
(iv) Any purported termination by the Company of the Executives employment otherwise than as
expressly permitted by this Agreement; or
(v) Any failure by the Company to comply with and satisfy Section 11(c) of this Agreement.
For purposes of this Section 5(c), any good faith determination of Good Reason made by the
Executive shall be conclusive. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, a
termination by the Executive for any reason during the 30-day period immediately following the
first anniversary of the Effective Date shall be deemed to be a termination for Good Reason for all
purposes of this Agreement.
(d)
Notice of Termination
. Any termination by the Company for Cause, or by the
Executive for Good Reason, shall be communicated by Notice of Termination to the other party hereto
given in accordance with Section 12(b) of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, a
Notice of Termination means a written notice which (i) indicates the specific termination
provision in this Agreement relied upon, (ii) to the extent applicable, sets forth in reasonable
detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of the Executives
employment under the provision so indicated, and (iii) if the Date of Termination (as defined
below) is other than the date of receipt of such notice, specifies the termination date (which date
shall be not more than thirty days after the giving of such notice). The failure by the Executive
or the Company to set forth in the Notice of Termination any fact or circumstance which contributes
to a showing of Good Reason or Cause shall not waive any right of the Executive or the Company,
respectively, hereunder or preclude the Executive or the Company, respectively, from asserting such
fact or circumstance in enforcing the Executives or the Companys rights hereunder.
8
(e)
Date of Termination
. Date of Termination means (i) if the Executives
employment is terminated by the Company for Cause, or by the Executive for Good Reason, the date of
receipt of the Notice of Termination or any later date specified therein, as the case may be, (ii)
if the Executives employment is terminated by the Company other than for Cause or Disability, the
Date of Termination shall be the date on which the Company notifies the Executive of such
termination, and (iii) if the Executives employment is terminated by reason of death or
Disability, the Date of Termination shall be the date of death of the Executive or the Disability
Effective Date, as the case may be.
6.
Obligations of the Company upon Termination
.
(a)
Good Reason; Other Than for Cause, Death or Disability
. If, during the Employment
Period, the Company shall terminate the Executives employment other than for Cause, death or
Disability or the Executive shall terminate employment for Good Reason:
(i) The Company shall pay to the Executive in a lump sum in cash within 30 days after the Date
of Termination the aggregate of the following amounts:
[a] The sum of [i] the Executives Annual Base Salary through the Date of Termination to the
extent not theretofore paid, [ii] the product of (x) the higher of [A] the Recent Annual Bonus and
[B] the Annual Bonus paid or payable, including any bonus or portion thereof which has been earned
but deferred (and annualized for any fiscal year consisting of less than 12 full months or during
which the Executive was employed for less than 12 full months), for the most recently completed
fiscal year during the Employment Period, if any (such higher amount being referred to as the
Highest Annual Bonus) and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in the
current fiscal year through the Date of Termination, and the denominator of which is 365 and [iii]
any compensation previously deferred by the Executive (together with any accrued interest or
earnings thereon) and any accrued vacation pay, in each case to the extent not theretofore paid
(the sum of the amounts described in clauses [i], [ii] and [iii] shall be hereinafter referred to
as the Accrued Obligations); and
[b] The amount equal to the product of [i] three and [ii] the sum of (x) the Executives
Annual Base Salary and (y) the Highest Annual Bonus; and
[c] An amount equal to the difference between [i] the actuarial equivalent of the benefit
(utilizing actuarial assumptions no less favorable to the Executive than those in effect under the
Retirement Plan (as defined below) immediately prior to the Effective Date, except as specified
below with respect to increases in base salary and annual bonus) under the qualified defined
benefit retirement plan in which the Executive participates (the Retirement Plan) and any excess
or supplemental retirement plan in which the Executive participates (together, the SERP)
9
which the Executive would receive if the Executives employment continued for three years after the
Date of Termination assuming for this purpose that all accrued benefits are fully vested, and,
assuming that (x) the Executives base salary increased in each of the three years by the amount
required by Section 4(b)(i) (in the case of Section 4-(b)(i)(y) based on increases (excluding
promotional increases) in base salary for the most recently completed fiscal year prior to the Date
of Termination) had the Executive remained employed, and (y) the Executives annual bonus
(annualized for any fiscal year consisting of less than twelve full months or during which the
Executive was employed for less than twelve full months) in each of the three years bears the same
proportion to the Executives base salary in such year or fraction thereof as it did for the last
full year prior to the Date of Termination, and [ii] the actuarial equivalent of the Executives
actual benefit (paid or payable), if any, under the Retirement Plan and the SERP as of the Date of
Termination;
(ii) For three years after the Executives Date of Termination, or such longer period as may
be provided by the terms of the appropriate plan, program, practice or policy, the Company shall
continue benefits to the Executive and/or the Executives family at least equal to those which
would have been provided to them in accordance with the plans, programs, practices and policies
described in Section 4(b)(iv) of this Agreement if the Executives employment had not been
terminated in accordance with the most favorable plans, practices, programs or policies of the
Company and its affiliated companies applicable generally to other peer executives and their
families during the 120-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date or, if more favorable
to the Executive, as in effect generally at any time thereafter with respect to other peer
executives of the Company and its affiliated companies and their families, provided, however, that
if the Executive becomes reemployed with another employer and is eligible to receive medical or
other welfare benefits under another employer provided plan, the medical and other welfare benefits
described herein shall be secondary to those provided under such other plan during such applicable
period of eligibility. For purposes of determining eligibility (but not the time of commencement
of benefits) of the Executive for retiree benefits pursuant to such plans, practices, programs and
policies, the Executive shall be considered to have remained employed until two and one-half years
after the Date of Termination and to have retired on the last day of such period;
(iii) The Company shall, at its sole expense as incurred, provide the Executive with
outplacement services the scope and provider of which shall be selected by the Executive in his
sole discretion; and
(iv) To the extent not theretofore paid or provided, the Company shall timely pay or provide
to the Executive any other amounts or benefits required to be paid or provided or which the
Executive is eligible to receive under any plan, program, policy or practice or contract or
agreement of the Company and its affiliated companies (such other amounts and benefits shall be
hereinafter referred to as the Other Benefits).
10
(b)
Death
. If the Executives employment is terminated by reason of the Executives
death during the Employment Period, this Agreement shall terminate without further obligations to
the Executives legal representatives under this Agreement, other than for payment of Accrued
Obligations and the timely payment or provision of Other Benefits. Accrued Obligations shall be
paid to the Executives estate or beneficiary, as applicable, in a lump sum in cash within 30 days
of the Date of Termination. With respect to the provision of Other Benefits, the term Other
Benefits as utilized in this Section 6(b) shall include, without limitation, and the Executives
estate and/or beneficiaries shall be entitled to receive, benefits at least equal to the most
favorable benefits provided by the Company and affiliated companies to the estates and
beneficiaries of peer executives of the Company and such affiliated companies under such plans,
programs, practices and policies relating to death benefits, if any, as in effect with respect to
other peer executives and their beneficiaries at any time during the 120-day period immediately
preceding the Effective Date or, if more favorable to the Executives estate and/or the Executives
beneficiaries, as in effect on the date of the Executives death with respect to other peer
executives of the Company and its affiliated companies and their beneficiaries.
(c)
Disability
. If the Executives employment is terminated by reason of the
Executives Disability during the Employment Period, this Agreement shall terminate without further
obligations to the Executive, other than for payment of Accrued Obligations and the timely payment
or provision of Other Benefits. Accrued Obligations shall be paid to the Executive in a lump sum
in cash within 30 days of the Date of Termination. With respect to the provision of Other
Benefits, the term Other Benefits as utilized in this Section 6(c) shall include, and the Executive
shall be entitled after the Disability Effective Date to receive, disability and other benefits at
least equal to the most favorable of those generally provided by the Company and its affiliated
companies to disabled executives and/or their families in accordance with such plans, programs,
practices and policies relating to disability, if any, as in effect generally with respect to other
peer executives and their families at any time during the 120-day period immediately preceding the
Effective Date or, if more favorable to the Executive and/or the Executives family, as in effect
at any time thereafter generally with respect to other peer executives of the Company and its
affiliated companies and their families.
(d)
Cause; Other than for Good Reason
. If the Executives employment shall be
terminated for Cause during the Employment Period, this Agreement shall terminate without further
obligations to the Executive other than the obligation to pay to the Executive (i) his Annual Base
Salary through the Date of Termination, (ii) the amount of any compensation previously deferred by
the Executive, and (iii) Other Benefits, in each case to the extent theretofore unpaid. If the
Executive voluntarily terminates employment during the Employment Period, excluding a termination
for Good Reason, this Agreement shall terminate without further obligations to the Executive, other
than for Accrued Obligations and the timely payment or provision of Other Benefits. In such case,
all Accrued Obligations shall be paid to the Executive in a lump sum in cash within 30 days of the
Date of Termination.
11
7.
Nonexclusivity of Rights
. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent or limit the
Executives continuing or future participation in any plan, program, policy or practice provided by
the Company or any of its affiliated companies and for which the Executive may qualify, nor shall
anything herein limit or otherwise affect such rights as the Executive may have under any contract
or agreement with the Company or any of its affiliated companies. Amounts which are vested
benefits or which the Executive is otherwise entitled to receive under any plan, policy, practice
or program of or any contract or agreement with the Company or any of its affiliated companies at
or subsequent to the Date of Termination shall be payable in accordance with such plan, policy,
practice or program or contract or agreement except as explicitly modified by this Agreement.
8.
Full Settlement
. The Companys obligation to make the payments provided for in
this Agreement and otherwise to perform its obligations hereunder shall not be affected by any
set-off, counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other claim, right or action which the Company may
have against the Executive or others. In no event shall the Executive be obligated to seek other
employment or take any other action by way of mitigation of the amounts payable to the Executive
under any of the provisions of this Agreement and such amounts shall not be reduced whether or not
the Executive obtains other employment. The Company agrees to pay as incurred, to the full extent
permitted by law, all legal fees and expenses which the Executive may reasonably incur as a result
of any contest (regardless of the outcome thereof) by the Company, the Executive or others of the
validity or enforceability of, or liability under, any provision of this Agreement or any guarantee
of performance thereof (including as a result of any contest by the Executive about the amount of
any payment pursuant to this Agreement), plus in each case interest on any delayed payment at the
applicable Federal rate provided for in Section 7872(f)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code).
9.
Certain Additional Payments by the Company
.
(a) Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event it shall be
determined that any payment or distribution by the Company to or for the benefit of the Executive
(whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or
otherwise, but determined without regard to any additional payments required under this Section 9)
(a Payment) would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code or any
interest or penalties are incurred by the Executive with respect to such excise tax (such excise
tax, together with any such interest and penalties, are hereinafter collectively referred to as the
Excise Tax), then the Executive shall be entitled to receive an additional payment (a Gross-Up
Payment) in an amount such that after payment by the Executive of all taxes (including any
interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes), including, without limitation, any
income taxes (and any interest and penalties imposed with respect thereto) and Excise Tax imposed
upon the Gross-Up Payment, the Executive retains an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the
Excise Tax imposed upon the Payments.
12
(b) Subject to the provisions of Section 9(c), all determinations required to be made under
this Section 9, including whether and when a Gross-Up Payment is required and the amount of such
Gross-Up Payment and the assumptions to be utilized in arriving at such determination, shall be
made by Arthur Andersen & Co. or such other certified public accounting firm as may be designated
by the Executive (the Accounting Firm) which shall provide detailed supporting calculations both
to the Company and the Executive within 15 business days of the receipt of notice from the
Executive that there has been a Payment, or such earlier time as is requested by the Company. In
the event that the Accounting Firm is serving as accountant or auditor for the individual, entity
or group effecting the Change of Control, the Executive shall appoint another nationally recognized
accounting firm to make the determinations required hereunder (which accounting firm shall then be
referred to as the Accounting Firm hereunder). All fees and expenses of the Accounting Firm shall
be borne solely by the Company. Any Gross-Up Payment, as determined pursuant to this Section 9,
shall be paid by the Company to the Executive within five days of the receipt of the Accounting
Firms determination. If the Accounting Firm determines that no Excise Tax is payable by the
Executive, it shall furnish the Executive with a written opinion that failure to report the Excise
Tax on the Executives applicable federal income tax return would not result in the imposition of a
negligence or similar penalty. Any determination by the Accounting Firm shall be binding upon the
Company and the Executive. As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Section 4999 of
the Code at the time of the initial determination by the Accounting Firm hereunder, it is possible
that Gross-Up Payments which will not have been made by the Company should have been made
(Underpayment), consistent with the calculations required to be made hereunder. In the event
that the Company exhausts its remedies pursuant to Section 9(c) and the Executive thereafter is
required to make a payment of any Excise Tax, the Accounting Firm shall determine the amount of the
Underpayment that has occurred and any such Underpayment shall be promptly paid by the Company to
or for the benefit of the Executive.
(c) The Executive shall notify the Company in writing of any claim by the Internal Revenue
Service that, if successful, would require the payment by the Company of the Gross-Up Payment.
Such notification shall be given as soon as practicable but no later than ten business days after
the Executive is informed in writing of such claim and shall apprise the Company of the nature of
such claim and the date on which such claim is requested to be paid. The Executive shall not pay
such claim prior to the expiration of the 30-day period following the date on which it gives such
notice to the Company (or such shorter period ending on the date that any payment of taxes with
respect to such claim is due). If the Company notifies the Executive in writing prior to the
expiration of such period that it desires to contest such claim, the Executive shall:
(i) Give the Company any information reasonably requested by the Company relating to such
claim,
(ii) Take such action in connection with contesting such claim as the Company shall reasonably
request in writing from time to time, including,
13
without limitation, accepting legal representation with respect to such claim by an attorney
reasonably selected by the Company,
(iii) Cooperate with the Company in good faith in order effectively to contest such claim, and
(iv) Permit the Company to participate in any proceedings relating to such claim; provided,
however, that the Company shall bear and pay directly all costs and expenses (including additional
interest and penalties) incurred in connection with such contest and shall indemnify and hold the
Executive harmless, on an after-tax basis, for any Excise Tax or income tax (including interest and
penalties with respect thereto) imposed as a result of such representation and payment of costs and
expenses. Without limitation on the foregoing provisions of this Section 9(c), the Company shall
control all proceedings taken in connection with such contest and, at its sole option, may pursue
or forgo any and all administrative appeals, proceedings, hearings and conferences with the taxing
authority in respect of such claim and may, at its sole option, either direct the Executive to pay
the tax claimed and sue for a refund or contest the claim in any permissible manner, and the
Executive agrees to prosecute such contest to a determination before any administrative tribunal,
in a court of initial jurisdiction and in one or more appellate courts, as the Company shall
determine; provided, however, that if the Company directs the Executive to pay such claim and sue
for a refund, the Company shall advance the amount of such payment to the Executive, on an
interest-free basis and shall indemnify and hold the Executive harmless, on an after-tax basis,
from any Excise Tax or income tax (including interest or penalties with respect thereto) imposed
with respect to such advance or with respect to any imputed income with respect to such advance;
and further provided that any extension of the statute of limitations relating to payment of taxes
for the taxable year of the Executive with respect to which such contested amount is claimed to be
due is limited solely to such contested amount. Furthermore, the Companys control of the contest
shall be limited to issues with respect to which a Gross-Up Payment would be payable hereunder and
the Executive shall be entitled to settle or contest, as the case may be, any other issue raised by
the Internal Revenue Service or any other taxing authority.
(d) If, after the receipt by the Executive of an amount advanced by the Company pursuant to
Section 9(c), the Executive becomes entitled to receive any refund with respect to such claim, the
Executive shall (subject to the Companys complying with the requirements of Section 9(c)) promptly
pay to the Company the amount of such refund (together with any interest paid or credited thereon
after taxes applicable thereto). If, after the receipt by the Executive of an amount advanced by
the Company pursuant to Section 9(c), a determination is made that the Executive shall not be
entitled to any refund with respect to such claim and the Company does not notify the Executive in
writing of its intent to contest such denial of refund prior to the expiration of 30 days after
such determination, then such advance shall be forgiven and shall not be required to be repaid and
the amount of such advance shall offset, to the extent thereof, the amount of Gross-Up Payment
required to be paid.
14
10.
Confidential Information
. The Executive shall hold in a fiduciary capacity for
the benefit of the Company all secret or confidential information, knowledge or data relating to
the Company or any of its affiliated companies, and their respective businesses, which shall have
been obtained by the Executive during the Executives employment by the Company or any of its
affiliated companies and which shall not be or become public knowledge (other than by acts by the
Executive or representatives of the Executive in violation of this Agreement). After termination
of the Executives employment with the Company, the Executive shall not, without the prior written
consent of the Company or as may otherwise be required by law or legal process, communicate or
divulge any such information, knowledge or data to anyone other than the Company and those
designated by it. In no event shall an asserted violation of the provisions of this Section 10
constitute a basis for deferring or withholding any amounts otherwise payable to the Executive
under this Agreement.
11.
Successors
.
(a) This Agreement is personal to the Executive and without the prior written consent of the
Company shall not be assignable by the Executive otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and
distribution. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Executives
legal representatives.
(b) This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Company and its
successors and assigns.
(c) The Company will require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger,
consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the
Company to assume expressly and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same
extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no such succession had taken place. As
used in this Agreement, Company shall mean the Company as hereinbefore defined and any successor
to its business and/or assets as aforesaid which assumes and agrees to perform this Agreement by
operation of law, or otherwise.
12.
Miscellaneous
.
(a) This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Wisconsin, without reference to principles of conflict of laws. The captions of this Agreement
are not part of the provisions hereof and shall have no force or effect. This Agreement may not be
amended or modified otherwise than by a written agreement executed by the parties hereto or their
respective successors and legal representatives.
15
(b) All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by
hand delivery to the other party or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
If to the Executive, to his address appearing on the records of the Company.
If to the Company:
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
3333 West Good Hope Road
Milwaukee, WI 53209
Attn: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
or to such other address as either party shall have furnished to the other in writing in accordance
herewith. Notice and communications shall be effective when actually received by the addressee.
(c) The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the
validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.
(d) The Company may withhold from any amounts payable under this Agreement such Federal,
state, local or foreign taxes as shall be required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable law or
regulation.
(e) The Executives or the Companys failure to insist upon strict compliance with any
provision hereof or any other provision of this Agreement or the failure to assert any right the
Executive or the Company may have hereunder, including, without limitation, the right of the
Executive to terminate employment for Good Reason pursuant to Section 5(c)(i)-(v) of this
Agreement, shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such provision or right or any other provision or
right of this Agreement.
(f) The Executive and the Company acknowledge that, except as may otherwise be provided under
any other written agreement between the Executive and the Company, the employment of the Executive
by the Company is at will and, prior to the Effective Date, the Executives employment and this
Agreement may be terminated by either the Executive or the Company at any time prior to the
Effective Date, in which case the Executive shall have no further rights under this Agreement.
From and after the Effective Date this Agreement shall supersede any other agreement between the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
16
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executives hand and, pursuant to the
authorization from its Board of Directors, the Company has caused these presents to be executed in
its name on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard Messina
|
|
|
Richard Messina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
|
|
|
BY
|
/s/ Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
|
|
Harold M. Stratton, II,
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
17
The stormy economic climate ushered in by the Great Recession of 2008-2009 has wreaked havoc on the
entire auto industry and brought chaos to the normal routines of business. STRATTEC, like most
companies tied to the global auto industry, got caught in the storm. But being surrounded by
economic uncertainty and unprecedented waves of change has strengthened our resolve to not only
survive the storm, but emerge in the calmer days ahead as a stronger company, ready for the future.
|
2009 ANNUAL REPORT
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION designs, develops, manufactures and markets automotive security
products including mechanical locks and keys, electronically enhanced locks and keys, steering
column and instrument panel ignition lock housings; and access control products including latches,
power sliding side door systems, power lift gate systems, power deck lid systems, door handles and
related access control products for North American automotive customers. We also supply global
automotive manufacturers through the VAST Alliance in which we participate with WITTE Automotive of
Velbert, Germany and ADAC Automotive of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Our products are shipped to
customer locations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe, South America, Korea and China,
and we provide full service and aftermarket support.
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
2
|
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
4
|
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
5
|
|
STRATTEC EQUIPPED VEHICLE LIST
|
|
|
12
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
|
13
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
25
|
|
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
44
|
|
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
|
|
45
|
|
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
|
|
|
47
|
|
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
|
|
|
48
|
|
DIRECTORS / OFFICERS / SHAREHOLDERS INFORMATION
|
|
|
49
|
|
PROSPECTIVE INFORMATION
A number of the matters and subject areas discussed in this Annual Report (see above Contents
section) contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking
words or phrases such as anticipate, believe, would, expect, intend, may, planned,
potential, should, will, and could. These include expected future financial results,
product offerings, global expansion, liquidity needs, financing ability, planned capital
expenditures, managements or the Companys expectations and beliefs, and similar matters discussed
in the Letter to the Shareholders, Companys Managements Discussion and Analysis, and other
sections of this Annual Report. The discussions of such matters and subject areas are qualified by
the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations generally, and also may
materially differ from the Companys actual future experience.
The Companys business, operations and financial performance are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties, which could result in material differences in actual results from the Companys
current expectations. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general
economic conditions, in particular relating to the automotive industry, customer demand for the
Companys and its customers products, competitive and technological developments, customer
purchasing actions, foreign currency fluctuations, costs of operations and other matters described
under Risk Factors in the Managements Discussion and Analysis section of this report. In
addition, such uncertainties and other operational matters are discussed further in the Companys
quarterly and annual report filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully
in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are only made as of the date
of this Annual Report and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update such
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances occurring after the date
of this Annual Report.
LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS
AUGUST, 2009
Fellow Shareholders:
It is with great relief that I can declare the end of what has been the worst year in our history.
The theme of this reports cover alludes to the difficult times with which we have been dealing. In
the past 18 months, we have encountered seven out of the eleven major risk categories we have
historically discussed in our annual reports, plus some we never expected. During the fiscal year,
we were hit with a barrage of bad news over which we had no control. Our focus shifted from
profitability to preserving cash. The significant level of uncertainty as to how the economy, and
in particular the auto industry, would evolve during this uncertain time was perhaps the most
frustrating part of dealing with the negative developments we were seeing on a daily basis. All of
this culminated in May and June with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings by our two largest
customers, Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corporation. That left us with three of our four largest
customers in bankruptcy as we ended this fiscal year. It has indeed been a stormy year.
Despite the circumstances surrounding our fiscal 2009, we believe the U.S. auto industry will
survive, and will under go additional changes that will be positive in the long term. Our intent
has therefore been to not only survive the short term industry turmoil, but to also be in a
position to take advantage of opportunities that may present themselves as a result of significant
distress in the automotive supply base. In addition, we continued to pursue identified strategic
activities to position the company for the future.
Early in the fiscal year, we moved ahead with our planned construction of a new facility in Juarez,
Mexico. This new facility replaced a leased facility and provided additional space for the
assimilation of the Power Products business we acquired from Delphi Corporation. The acquisition
was completed on November 30, 2008 at which time the U.S. portion of that business became STRATTEC
POWER ACCESS LLC. While the transaction occurred at the beginning of a low point in sales for these
products, we have been pleased with the new depth of product and expertise this acquisition has
brought to STRATTEC. We believe it has significant potential for our business.
The new plant in Juarez and the creation of STRATTEC POWER ACCESS were two major uses of cash
during the year. We began the year with $51.5 million in cash, and ended the year with $22.8
million. The plant project expenditures were $6.0 million, while the acquisition and related
expenses amounted to $4.9 million. Other discretionary uses of cash included pension contributions
of $3.0 million, stock repurchases of $6.2 million, and dividend payments of $1.5 million.
As the recession deepened and the financial viability of our customers became more of an issue, the
uncertainty as to how and when these economic forces would be resolved caused us to be increasingly
concerned with preserving cash. During the last nine months of fiscal 2009 we took actions to
curtail our spending, and made longer-term cost reductions such as a 10% reduction in our salaried
work force, as well as reductions in salaries and 401(k) matching contributions. From an
operations standpoint, we made permanent and temporary layoffs to tailor our hourly work force to
the lower production volumes we experienced. Our goal was to maintain cash reserves of at least $20
million, and through the cost reduction and cost avoidance actions we took, we were successful in
remaining at the
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
2
|
LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS
$22-23 million range of cash on hand for the last four months of the fiscal year.
One of the actions we took to preserve cash was to suspend the payment of dividends. While this was
not a desirable outcome for any shareholder, I believe it was the correct and prudent thing to do
under the circumstances.
The threat and the reality of Chrysler and GM entering bankruptcy were perhaps our major concerns
over the last eight months. We were not as concerned over the short-term financial hit we would
take with our receivables as we were for the long term implications these bankruptcies could have
on the whole North American auto industry.
I do not have the space to detail here all the implications these events have for our industry. Yet
from our perspective the outcomes from the bankruptcies have so far been mainly positive. While in
bankruptcy, both Chrysler and GM petitioned the bankruptcy courts to allow them to pay suppliers
for pre- and post-filing invoices under normal established terms. The courts allowed this, thereby
avoiding payment problems for suppliers. On top of the U.S. Treasury program to guarantee auto
supplier receivables, the courts action removed the financial stress frozen receivables would have
inflicted. The U.S. government pledged to back both Chrysler and GM vehicle warranties while the
companies were in bankruptcy, thus negating a major consumer concern. Collectively, these actions
helped stabilize a truly ugly situation. And most surprising was the rapid exit of both companies
from bankruptcy. As I write this letter (end of July), both companies have resumed production and
are focusing on demonstrating their agility as new forms of their former selves.
While this particular chapter in automotive history is far from over, there has been a welcome
relief in that there is more certainty and optimism in the outlook for the industrys future. We
believe there is even a hint of an upturn in automotive production, indicating that at last we may
have seen the bottom. I dont believe there will be a quick recovery, but a slow recovery is
certainly better than what we have experienced over the last nine months.
On balance, I believe we have reacted to the events of the last year with a measured, reasoned
approach. We have successfully walked the thin line between reducing costs and decimating our
ability to remain a viable supplier. With the actions we have taken we believe we are positioned to
once again return to profitability, even at the reduced levels of production anticipated for the
domestic auto industry as it regains positive momentum. Our customers value the support we have
given them through these tough times, and the relative financial stability we have demonstrated.
Operationally and strategically we were able to stay on track, and these things will help us as
consumer confidence and spending resume with an improving economy.
I will always be mindful of those people who lost their jobs at STRATTEC as we adjusted to the
reality of the recession and the restructuring of the auto industry. For them, surviving the storm
took on a deeper, more personal challenge than those of us who remain with the business. My fellow
STRATTEC associates and I hope that they are the first to be able to benefit from an improving
economy.
Sincerely,
Harold M. Stratton II
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
3
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(IN MILLIONS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
126.1
|
|
|
$
|
159.6
|
|
|
$
|
167.7
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
(Loss) Income from Operations
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Net (Loss) Income
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
128.2
|
|
|
|
144.2
|
|
|
|
151.4
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
106.0
|
|
ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED (EVA
®
)
All U.S. associates and many of our Mexico-based salaried associates participate in incentive plans
that are based upon our ability to add economic value to the enterprise. During 2008, our EVA
®
Plan
was modified to include cash and cash equivalents as part of the Companys net capital employed in
the business. Because cash and cash equivalents were a significant component of the capital
employed in the business in 2008 and 2009 they increased the capital charge, thereby contributing
to our negative EVA. The EVA
®
performance for 2009 was a negative $13.7 million. We believe that
EVA
®
represents an accurate measure of STRATTECs overall performance and shareholder value. (For
further explanation of our EVA
®
Plan and the effect negative EVA
®
has on awards granted under our
incentive plans, see our 2009 definitive Proxy Statement.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss After Cash-Basis Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Average Monthly Net Capital Employed
|
|
$
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Capital
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Value Added
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVA
®
is not a traditional financial measurement under U.S. GAAP and may not be similar to EVA
®
calculations used by other companies. However, STRATTEC believes the reporting of EVA
®
provides
investors with greater visibility of economic profit. The following is a reconciliation of the
relevant GAAP financial measures to the non-GAAP measures used in the calculation of STRATTECs
EVA
®
.
Net Operating Loss After Cash-Basis Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Net Loss as Reported
|
|
$
|
(6.1
|
)
|
Deferred Tax Provision
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Profit After
Cash-Basis Taxes
|
|
$
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Average Monthly Net Capital Employed:
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity as Reported at June 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
71.4
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net Capital Employed at June 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
78.5
|
|
Impact of 12 Month Average
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Monthly Net Capital Employed
|
|
$
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVA
®
is a registered trademark of Stern, Stewart & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
4
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
BASIC BUSINESS
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION designs, develops, manufactures and markets automotive security
products including mechanical locks and keys, electronically enhanced locks and keys, steering
column and instrument panel ignition lock housings; and access control products including latches,
power sliding side door systems, power lift gate systems, power deck lid systems, door handles and
related access control products for North American automotive customers. We also supply global
automotive manufacturers through the VAST Alliance in which we participate with WITTE Automotive of
Velbert, Germany and ADAC Automotive of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Our products are shipped to
customer locations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe, South America, Korea and China,
and we provide full service and aftermarket support.
HISTORY
STRATTEC formerly was a division of Briggs & Stratton Corporation. In 1995, STRATTEC was spun off
from Briggs & Stratton through a tax-free distribution to the then-existing Briggs & Stratton
shareholders and has since been an independent public company for fourteen years.
Our history in the automotive security business spans 100 years. STRATTEC has been the worlds
largest producer of automotive locks and keys since the late 1920s, and we currently maintain a
dominant share of the North American markets for these products.
PRODUCTS
Our traditional products are locks and keys for cars and light trucks. A typical new car uses a set
of two to three locks. A typical 3-way lockset contains a steering column/ignition lock, a drivers
door lock and a rear compartment (trunk, hatch or liftgate) lock.
Pickup trucks also use two to
three locks, while sport utility vehicles and vans use three to five locks. Some vehicles have
additional locks for consoles, storage compartments or folding rear seats. Pickup truck tailgate
locks and spare tire locks are offered as options. Usually, two keys are provided with each vehicle
lockset. Many of the vehicles we currently supply are using keys with sophisticated radio frequency
identification technology for theft prevention. However, keys with remote entry devices integrated
into a single unit have been added to our product line and are gaining in popularity.
A growing product line for us is ignition lock housings. These housings are the mating part for our
ignition locks and typically are part of the steering column structure, although there are
instrument panel-mounted versions for certain vehicle applications. These
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
5
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
housings are either zinc, or magnesium die castings or plastic and can include electronic
components for theft deterrent systems.
We are also developing business for additional access control products, including trunk latches,
liftgate latches, tailgate latches, hood latches, side door latches and related hardware for this
product category. With our completed acquisition of Delphi Corporations Power Products Group in
fiscal 2009, we are now supplying power access devices for sliding side doors, liftgates and trunk
lids. Through a joint venture formed with ADAC Automotive during fiscal 2007, we also supply door
handle components and related vehicle access hardware.
MARKETS
We are a direct supplier to OEM auto and light truck manufacturers as well as other
transportation-related manufacturers. Our largest customers are General Motors Company, Chrysler
Group LLC and Ford Motor Company. Our product mix varies by customer, but generally our sales tend
to be highest in lock and key products, followed by ignition lock housings, power access products,
the door handle and trim products produced by ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico and latch products.
Direct sales to various OEMs represented approximately 69% of our total sales for fiscal 2009. The
remainder of our revenue is received primarily through sales to the OEM service channels, the
aftermarket and Tier 1 customers.
Sales to our major automotive customers, both OEM and Tier 1, are coordinated through direct sales
personnel located in our Detroit-area office. Sales are also facilitated through daily interaction
between our customer Program Managers and Application Engineers located in Detroit, and other
product engineering personnel. Sales to other OEM customers are accomplished through a combination
of our own sales personnel located in Detroit and personnel in our Milwaukee headquarters office.
STRATTECs products are supported by an extensive staff of experienced product engineers. This
staff, which includes product design, quality and manufacturing engineers, is capable of providing
complete design, development and testing of new products for our customers. This staff also is
available for customer problem solving, warranty analysis, and other activities that arise during a
products life cycle. Our customers receive after-sales support in the form of special field
service kits, service manuals, and specific in-plant production repair programs.
The majority of our OEM products are sold in North America. While a modest amount of exporting is
done to automotive assembly plants in Europe, Asia and South America, we are in the process of
expanding our
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
6
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
presence in these markets and elsewhere through our Vehicle Access Systems Technology (VAST)
Alliance with WITTE-Automotive GmbH and ADAC Automotive. This Alliance is described in more detail
on page 9.
OEM service and replacement parts are sold to the OEMs own service operations. In addition, we
distribute our components and security products to the automotive aftermarket through approximately
50 authorized wholesale distributors, as well as other marketers and users of component parts,
including export customers. Increasingly, our products find their way into the retail channel,
specifically the hardware store channel. Our ability to provide a full line of keys to that channel
has been accomplished through the introduction of the STRATTEC XL key line. This extension to our
line includes keys that we currently do not supply on an OE basis, including keys for Toyota, Honda
and other popular domestic and import vehicles. This extended line of keys enable automotive repair
specialists to satisfy consumer needs for repair or replacement parts. Our aftermarket activities
are serviced through a warehousing operation integral to our Milwaukee headquarters and
manufacturing facility.
CUSTOMER FOCUS
To bring the proper focus to the relationships with our major customers, we have seven
customer-focused teams, each with a Director of Sales, a Product Business Manager, one or two
Engineering Program Managers and Customer Application Engineers. In addition to customer teams for
General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, we currently have teams for New Domestic Vehicle Manufacturers,
Access Controls (power and manual devices), Driver Control/Ignition Lock Housing customers, Tiered
Products, and Service and Aftermarket customers. Sales and engineering for
The Aston Martin DBS uses an electronic key fob and mating docking station developed by STRATTEC
exclusively for Aston Martin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
7
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
ADAC-STRATTEC LLC are supported by our JV partner, ADAC
Automotive.
Each Sales Director is responsible for the overall relationship between STRATTEC and a
specific customer group. Engineering Program Managers report to their respective teams and are
responsible for coordinating engineering resources and managing new product programs for their
customers.
To serve our customers product needs, STRATTECs engineering resources are organized by
product type. We currently have four product groups: Locks and Keys, Latches and Power Access
Devices, Driver Control/Ignition Lock Housings and Electrical. Each group has an Engineering
Manager and a complement of skilled engineers who design and develop products for specific
applications. In doing this, each engineering group works closely with the Product Business
Managers, team Engineering Program Managers, sales personnel and application engineers.
Underlying this organization is a formalized product development process to identify and meet
customer needs in the shortest possible time. By following this streamlined development system, we
shorten product lead times, tighten our response to market changes and provide our customers with
the optimum value solution to their security/access control requirements. STRATTEC is also ISO/TS
16949 and ISO 14001 certified. This means we embrace the philosophy that quality should exist not
only in the finished product, but in every step of our processes as well.
OPERATIONS
A significant number of the components that go into our products are manufactured at our main
facility and headquarters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This facility produces zinc die cast components,
stampings and key blanks. We have two owned production facilities in Juarez, Mexico operating as
STRATTEC de Mexico. Plant No. 1 houses assembly operations for locksets and ignition lock housings.
Plant No. 2 houses our key finishing operations as well as dedicated space for the assembly
operations of STRATTEC POWER ACCESS de Mexico and ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico.
Plant No. 2 in Juarez is a new facility we built during fiscal 2009 to replace a leased
facility. This leased facility had housed STRATTEC Componentes Automotrices, a wholly-owned
subsidiary under which our key finishing operations operated. This subsidiary was merged into
STRATTEC de Mexico at the end of fiscal 2009.
ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT
Research and development activities are centered around a dedicated research engineering staff
we call our Advanced Development Group. This group has the responsibility for developing future
products and processes that will keep us in the forefront of the markets we serve. Projects we are
pursuing focus on electronic and mechanical access control products, modularization of related
access/security control components and new manufacturing processes to reduce costs for ourselves
and our customers. Once our Advanced Development Group establishes a proof-of-concept product
utilizing new technology, further product development shifts to our engineering groups for
commercialization and product applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
VAST ALLIANCE
In fiscal 2001, we entered into a formal Alliance with WITTE-Velbert GmbH, an automotive
supplier based in Germany which designs, develops, manufactures and markets automotive access
control products for European-based customers. This Alliance consisted of two initiatives. The
first was a cross licensing agreement which allowed STRATTEC to manufacture and market WITTEs core
products in North America, and WITTE to manufacture and market STRATTECs core products in Europe.
The second initiative was a 50-50 joint venture to invest in operations with local partners in
strategic markets outside of Europe and North America.
In February of 2006, we announced the expansion of the Alliance and related joint venture with
the addition of ADAC Plastics, Inc. ADAC, of Grand Rapids, Michigan adds North American expertise
in door handles, a part of WITTEs core product line that STRATTEC did not support, and an
expertise in color-matched painting of these components which we believe is unique in the world.
With the expansion of the Alliance, we now have a full range of access control related
products available on a global basis to support customer programs. To identify this powerful
combination of independent companies focused on working together, we renamed the joint venture
Vehicle Access Systems Technology LLC, and the Alliance is now called the VAST Alliance. WITTE is
now called WITTE Automotive, and ADAC is now doing business as ADAC Automotive. We have adopted a
common graphic image in which we share a logo mark and colors, and a specific logo for the Alliance
itself to be used on the partners printed and electronic presentation materials. Our VAST LLC
partners in China and Brazil adopted the name and image change so that VAST now truly has a global
brand awareness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
ADAC-STRATTEC de MEXICO
During fiscal 2007, we formed a joint venture with ADAC
Automotive called ADAC-STRATTEC LLC including a wholly owned
Mexican subsidiary ADAC-STRATTEC de MEXICO (ASdM). The
purpose of this joint venture is to produce certain ADAC and
STRATTEC products utilizing ADACs plastic molding expertise and
STRATTECs assembly capability. ASdM currently operates out of
defined space in one of STRATTECs manufacturing facilities located
in Juarez, Mexico. Initial products from this joint venture include door
handle components and exterior trim components for customers
producing in Mexico. Financial results for this JV are consolidated
into STRATTECs financial statements. As a start-up
operation, ASdM had a minimal financial impact on
STRATTECs fiscal 2007 through 2009
operating results. However,
beginning in our fiscal 2010, we expect
there will be
growing activity
in this joint
venture.
STRATTEC has just introduced the worlds first codeable padlock. In a simple one-step process,
users can code the padlock to their vehicle key. This provides significant convenience by reducing
the number of keys users need to secure their lockers, storage sheds and vehicle accessories such
as tool boxes, trailer hitches, etc.
STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC
During fiscal year 2009, we formed a new subsidiary with WITTE Automotive called STRATTEC
POWER ACCESS LLC (SPA) to acquire the North American business of the Delphi Power Products Group.
WITTE is a minority owner. SPA in turn owns a Mexican subsidiary, STRATTEC Power Access de Mexico.
The purpose of this subsidiary is to produce power access devices for sliding side doors, liftgates
and trunk lids. SPA de Mexico currently operates out of defined space in one of STRATTECs
manufacturing facilities located in Juarez, Mexico. Financial results for SPA are consolidated in
STRATTECs financial statements. As a new operation effective November 30, 2008, SPA had a negative
impact on STRATTECs fiscal 2009 operating results due to the overall economic slowdown that was
experienced throughout the global economy. Beginning with our first full year of operation in
fiscal 2010, we expect there will be improved results in this new joint venture.
SEASONAL NATURE OF THE BUSINESS
The manufacturing of components used in automobiles is driven by the normal peaks and valleys
associated with the automotive industry. Typically, the months of July and August are relatively
slow as summer vacation shutdowns and model year changeovers occur at the automotive assembly
plants. Further, September volumes increase rapidly as the new model
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
year begins. This volume strength continues through October and into early November. As the holiday
and winter seasons approach, the demand for automobiles slows as does production. March usually
brings a major sales and production increase, which then continues through most of June. This
results in our first fiscal quarter (ending in September) sales and operating results typically
being our weakest, with the remaining quarters being more consistent. The recession of 2008-2009
abnormally altered this pattern resulting in dramatically reduced production levels throughout the
period. We believe the more normal peaks and valleys will return as the economy emerges from the
recession.
GLOBAL PRESENCE
|
|
1. STRATTEC Milwaukee, Wisconsin
1
|
|
2. STRATTEC de Mexico Juarez, Mexico
1
|
|
3. STRATTEC de Mexico Key Finishing Juarez, Mexico
1
|
|
4. ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico Juarez, Mexico
|
|
5. STRATTEC Power Access de Mexico Juarez, Mexico
|
|
6. ADAC Automotive Grand Rapids and Muskegan, Michigan
1
|
|
7. ADAC Automotive, STRATTEC and STRATTEC POWER ACCESS
|
|
(Sales/Engineering Offices Detroit, Michigan
1
|
|
8. WITTE Automotive Velbert, Germany
1
|
9. WITTE Automotive Nejdek, Czech Republic
1
|
10. VAST do Brasil Sao Paulo, Brazil
2
|
11. VAST Fuzhou Fuzhou, China
2
|
12. VAST Great Shanghai Co. Shanghai, China
2
|
13. VAST Japan Tokyo, Japan (Branch Office)
2
|
14. VAST Korea Anyang, Korea (Branch Office)
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Members of the VAST Alliance.
2
Units of VAST LLC joint venture.
|
ECONOMIC VALUE COMMITMENT
The underlying philosophy of our business, and the means by which we measure our performance,
is Economic Value Added (EVA
®
). Simply stated, economic value is created when our
business enterprise yields a return greater than the cost of capital we and our shareholders have
invested in STRATTEC. The amount by which our return exceeds the cost of our capital is
EVA
®
. In line with this philosophy, EVA
®
bonus plans are in effect for all
our U.S. associates, outside directors and many of our Mexico-based salaried associates as an
incentive to help positively drive the business.
STRATTECs significant market presence is the result of a 100-year commitment to creating
quality products and systems that are responsive to changing needs. As technologies advance and
markets grow, STRATTEC retains that commitment to meeting and exceeding the expectations of our
customers, and providing economic value to our shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with STRATTEC SECURITY
CORPORATIONs Financial Statements and Notes thereto. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to
years or quarters refer to fiscal years or fiscal quarters.
Purchase of Delphi Power Products Business
Effective November 30, 2008, STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION in combination with WITTE
Automotive of Velbert, Germany, and Vehicle Access Systems Technology LLC (VAST), a joint venture
between STRATTEC, WITTE and ADAC Automotive of Grand Rapids, Michigan, completed the acquisition of
certain assets, primarily equipment and inventory, and assumption of certain employee liabilities
of Delphi Corporations global Power Products business for approximately $7.3 million. For the
purposes of owning and operating the North American portion of this acquired business, STRATTEC
established a new subsidiary, STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC (SPA), which is 80 percent owned by
STRATTEC and 20 percent owned by WITTE. The purchase price of the North American portion of the
acquired business totaled approximately $4.4 million, of which STRATTEC paid approximately $3.5
million. WITTE acquired the European portion of the business for approximately $2.4 million.
Effective February 12, 2009, SPA acquired the Asian portion of the business for approximately
$500,000.
The acquisition of the North American and Asian portions of this business by SPA was not
material to STRATTECs consolidated financial statements. Amortizable intangible assets acquired
totaled $890,000 and are subject to amortization over a period of nine years. In addition, goodwill
of approximately $223,000 was recorded as part of the transaction. The amortizable intangibles and
goodwill are included in Other Long-Term Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. All goodwill
and other intangible assets resulting from the purchase are expected to be deductible for tax
purposes. The purchase accounting was completed as of the end of fiscal 2009.
The operating results of SPA for the period December 1, 2008 through June 28, 2009 are
consolidated with the financial results of STRATTEC and resulted in increased net loss to STRATTEC
of approximately $2.1 million during fiscal 2009.
SPA designs, develops, tests, manufactures, markets and sells power systems to operate vehicle
sliding side doors and rear compartment access points such as liftgates and trunk lids. In
addition, the product line includes power cinching latches and cinching strikers used in these
systems. Current customers for these products supplied from North America are Chrysler LLC, Hyundai
Motor Company, General Motors and Ford.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal 2009 Highlights
During fiscal year 2009, our major customers, Chrysler LLC, General Motors Corporation and
Ford Motor Company presented long-term viability plans to the United States Government. These plans
focused on reducing North American production capacity, closing facilities, eliminating certain
vehicle models and brands and reducing overall structural costs to operate profitably at a 10
million vehicle production build level in North America. The above customers have taken steps to
implement these plans over the next few years. The overall expectation is that North American
vehicle build schedules will rebound from the historical 27 year low experienced in 2009, but will
not reach the previous annual production build levels of 15-16 million vehicles again during the
next 5 years.
Our financial results for the year ended June 28, 2009 reflect the overall weakness in the
U.S. economy, and in particular the sharp decline in vehicle sales and production during the year.
In our quarter ended June 28, 2009, our two largest customers, Chrysler LLC and General Motors
Corporation, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for their U.S. legal entities. Chryslers
filing occurred on April 30, 2009, and General Motors filed on June 1, 2009. Within days of its
filing, Chrysler took the unusual step of shutting down all of its North American manufacturing
facilities during May and June 2009. This development was on top of previously announced General
Motors plant shutdowns idling a significant amount of its North American plant capacity for the
purpose of reducing its retail inventory of new vehicles. May and June of 2009 were therefore
extremely slow sales months for STRATTEC, each nearly 45 percent below our April 2009 sales levels.
This slowness extended into July 2009, the first
month of our fiscal 2010 year.
We are reacting to the unprecedented decline in the North American auto industry in several
ways. During our second, third and fourth fiscal quarters of 2009, we reduced our productive work
force at both our Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Juarez, Mexico facilities through a combination of
temporary and permanent layoffs. We will continue to adjust our productive workforce in this way
until the business improves or stabilizes at a predictable level. Since the beginning of 2009, we
have not replaced salaried associates who retired or left through normal attrition, saving nearly
$1 million on an annualized basis. On January 15, 2009, we reduced our U.S. salaried workforce by
approximately 10 percent. Effective January 1, 2009, we also froze executive officer salaries at
their calendar year 2008 levels, and reduced our 401(k) match for salaried associates. Effective
May 15, 2009, we reduced salaries for all salaried associates to the September 1, 2008 levels. We
expect these changes will save approximately $2.5 million on an annual basis. However, these
savings were offset during our third fiscal quarter with a charge to earnings of $350,000 for
severance and outplacement costs. Other cost reduction activities aimed at reducing
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
general overhead costs are in place and continue to be implemented on an ongoing basis.
In addition, with the November 2008 completion of our new manufacturing facility in Juarez,
Mexico we vacated two leased facilities, one in Juarez and one in Matamoros, Mexico. We incurred
approximately $205,000 of relocation costs to vacate the leased facility in Juarez. We anticipate
annual savings of approximately $500,000 related to vacating the Juarez leased facility. The moves
from the leased facilities to the new facility were completed during our third fiscal quarter. We
did not incur lease termination costs as a result of vacating the leased facilities. The
contractual lease term for the facility in Matamoros expired in July 2009. The lease related to
this facility was assumed as part of the November 30, 2008 purchase of Delphi Power Products. The
building was occupied through February 2009. We continued to make lease payments for the Matamoros
facility through the end of the lease term. The lease payments made during the period the building
was occupied were recorded as rent expense. A purchase accounting reserve was established as of the
purchase date in accordance with our plan to move the operations from the Matamoros facility to the
new facility in Juarez. The lease payments made from March 2009 through July 2009 were charged
against this reserve. The contractual lease term for the facility in Juarez expired on February 2,
2009. This building was occupied through the end of January 2009. Lease payments for the Juarez
facility were made and recorded as rent expense through the end of the lease term.
A large volume ignition lock housing program originally planned for our VAST Fuzhou joint
venture plant in China will soon be sourced from our North American operations, providing
additional sales and increased production of this product line at both our Milwaukee and Juarez
facilities. Production for this program began late in our 2009 fiscal year, and if current
forecasts are correct, it should enhance sales by more than $12 million over the next two year
period.
The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial position and results of operations
for the periods ended June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008. As of the fourth quarter of 2009, we changed
our method of accounting for inventory from the LIFO method to the FIFO method. Certain prior year
amounts have been restated to reflect the LIFO to FIFO inventory costing change. See further
discussion of the accounting change in Notes to Financial Statements.
2009
Compared to
2008
Net sales were $126.1 million in 2009 compared to $159.6 million in 2008. The sales decreases
in the current year were experienced across all of our largest customers. Sales to General Motors
Corporation in the current year were $39.2 million compared to $45.0 million in the prior year due
to lower vehicle production volumes on the vehicles we supply. The impact of the lower volumes was
partially offset by the takeover of certain passenger car lockset production from another supplier
and $800,000 of sales generated by SPA primarily relating to products supplied on the Buick minivan
produced in China. The prior year sales to General Motors were impacted by production reductions as
a direct result of a strike called by the UAW against a major General Motors supplier. Sales to
Chrysler LLC were $31.9 million in the current year compared to $40.2 million in the prior year.
This sales reduction was due to a combination of lower vehicle production volumes and reduced
component content in the security products we supply, offset by $9.8 million of sales generated by
SPA relating primarily to the products supplied on the Dodge, Chrysler and Volkswagen minivans.
Sales to Ford Motor Company were $12.6 million in the current year compared to $19.4 million in the
prior year and sales to Delphi Corporation were $6.3 million in the current year compared to $14.9
million in the prior year. Included in the current year Ford sales were $800,000 of sales generated
by SPA primarily relating to products supplied on the Lincoln Town Car. The lower sales to Ford and
Delphi were primarily due to lower vehicle production volumes. The impact of the above mentioned
strike in the prior year reduced sales to General Motors and Delphi Corporation by approximately
$3.5 million in 2008.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 10.5 percent in the current year compared to
15.5 percent in the prior year. The decrease in the gross profit margin was primarily attributed to
our customers reduced vehicle production volumes, which lowered the absorption of our fixed
manufacturing costs. The impact of the reduced production volumes was partially offset by lower
purchased material costs for zinc and brass along with a favorable Mexican peso to U.S. dollar
exchange rate affecting our operations in Mexico. The current year was also negatively impacted by
approximately $205,000 of relocation costs related to the move from
our leased facility in Juarez, Mexico to our new owned manufacturing facility in Juarez, a
non-recurring inventory adjustment of $152,000 and severance costs of $154,000 relating to a work
force reduction in Mexico in January 2009. Construction of our new facility was completed in
November 2008, and the move from our leased facility in Juarez to our new facility was completed in
February 2009. The non-recurring inventory adjustment related to finished goods inventory that was
acquired in the Delphi Power Products business acquisition. The value of the finished goods
inventory acquired was adjusted to its selling price less costs to sell, and gross profit was
negatively impacted by the inventory that was sold during the year. The 2008 year was also
negatively impacted by non-recurring items including a lump sum bonus totaling $243,000 paid to our
Milwaukee represented hourly workers resulting from a new four-year labor contract ratified
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
on June 22, 2008 as well as the disposal of a customer specific fixed asset resulting in a fixed
asset disposal loss of $382,000.
The average zinc price paid per pound decreased to $1.21 in the current year from $1.53 in the
prior year. During the current year, we used approximately 5.3 million pounds of zinc. This
resulted in decreased zinc costs of approximately $1.7 million in the current year compared to the
prior year. The average brass price paid per pound decreased to $3.05 in the current year from
$3.84 in the prior year. During the current year, we used approximately 830,000 pounds of brass.
This resulted in decreased brass costs of approximately $655,000 in the current year compared to
the prior year.
The inflation rate in Mexico for the twelve months ended June 28, 2009 was approximately 5.6
percent and increased our operating costs by approximately $880,000 in the current year over the
prior year. The average U.S. dollar/Mexican peso exchange rate increased to approximately 12.75
pesos to the dollar in the current year from approximately 10.75 pesos to the dollar in the prior
year. This resulted in decreased costs related to our Mexican operations of approximately $2.7
million in the current year compared to the prior year.
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses were $25.5 million in the current year,
compared to $24.0 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily attributed to hiring SPA
engineering personnel, contracting with Delphi for temporary transition services related to the
acquisition, outside legal costs incurred to defend a STRATTEC patent net of a recovery from a
third party and a charge of $350,000 for severance and outplacement costs relating to a 10 percent
reduction in our U.S. salaried work force on January 15, 2009. These added costs were partially
offset by the cost savings from the salary work force reduction, reduced 401(k) match for salaried
associates implemented in January 2009 and a salary reduction and temporary work furloughs for our
U.S. salaried associates, each of which were implemented in May 2009.
The provision for bad debts of $500,000 in the current year was recorded in connection with
Chryslers filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for certain of their U.S. legal entities on
April 30, 2009. The Chrysler and General Motors bankruptcy filings had little affect on our
receivables with Chrysler and General Motors, as both Companies were able to continue making
payments to suppliers for parts they had purchased prior to their bankruptcy filings. We increased
our reserve for doubtful accounts at the end of our fiscal 2009 third quarter by $500,000 in
anticipation of difficulties collecting on our receivables from Chrysler. While a majority of our
pre-bankruptcy receivables from both Chrysler and General Motors have been paid under normal terms,
there remain some minor pre-bankruptcy past-due receivable balances still outstanding. We expect
these to be resolved or adequately accounted for through the reserve recorded in the third quarter.
Subsequently, both Companies emerged from bankruptcy and started to resume production in July.
The loss from operations in the current year was $12.7 million compared to income from
operations of $805,000 in the prior year. This reduction was the result of the decrease in sales
and gross profit margin, the increase in operating expenses and the provision for doubtful accounts
as discussed above.
Interest income was $731,000 in the current year compared to $2,749,000 in the prior year.
The decrease was due to both lower invested cash and cash equivalent balances and investment
returns on these assets in the current year compared to the prior year.
Net other income was $885,000 in the current year compared to $230,000 in the prior year. The
increase was primarily due to favorable gains resulting from foreign currency transactions entered
into by our Mexican subsidiaries of $918,000 in the current year compared to transaction losses of
$320,000 in the prior year. The foreign currency transaction gains were offset by increased losses
on the Rabbi Trust which funds our supplemental executive retirement plan totaling $393,000 in the
current year compared to $174,000 in the prior year. The investments held in the Rabbi Trust are
considered trading securities. Also offsetting the foreign currency transaction gains were reduced
gains from our joint venture investment in China. Our portion of the joint venture gain totaled
$245,000 in the current year compared to $561,000 in the prior year. The reduction was primarily
due to lower income generated by this joint venture.
Our effective income tax rate for 2009 was 40.7 percent compared to 25.0 percent in 2008. The
2009 tax benefit was impacted by a higher U.S. effective tax rate applied to pre-tax U.S. losses
and a lower Mexican tax rate being applied to pre-tax income in Mexico. The overall U.S. effective
tax rate differed from the Federal statutory tax rate primarily due to the effects of state income
taxes. The 2008 provision included a favorable tax adjustment primarily related to Mexican tax
benefits allowed for our Mexican subsidiaries. The favorable adjustment
totaled $573,000. In addition, reduced 2008 earnings resulted in a larger percentage of our
consolidated taxable income being taxed in Mexico, which has a lower effective rate as compared to
the U.S. rate. At June 28, 2009, we have deferred tax assets resulting from unused operating losses
and unused tax credits that we are allowed to carry-forward to future years. The deferred tax asset
relating to these losses and credit carry-forwards total approximately $3.3 million at June 28,
2009. The loss and credit carry-forwards expire in years 2017 through 2029. We evaluated the need
to maintain a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Based on this evaluation, which
included a review of recent profitability and projections of future profitability, we concluded
that a valuation allowance is not necessary.
2008
Compared to
2007
Net sales were $159.6 million in 2008 compared to $167.7 million in 2007. The lower sales
primarily resulted from a 12-week strike against a major supplier to General Motors
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Corporation
and a dramatic shift in vehicle demand by consumers. The strike, which occurred over the last four weeks of our fiscal 2008 third quarter and eight weeks of our fourth
quarter, affected General Motors production, resulting in the temporary closure of several vehicle
plants we supply. These were normally high-volume production plants. Most of these plants had been
producing large pickup trucks and SUVs. During our fiscal 2008 fourth quarter gasoline prices
reached and then exceeded $4.00 per gallon, significantly accelerating a shift in consumer
preferences away from large vehicles. The resulting glut of large vehicles at retail outlets caused
all of our major customers to re-align their production schedules and mix, emphasizing smaller
vehicles. The volume of vehicles produced by our customers during this re-alignment had declined,
resulting in lower sales and production. While the effect of the strike was a one-time event, we
believe the re-alignment of production to reflect changing consumer preferences is a long-term
issue.
Sales to our largest customers overall decreased in 2008 as compared to 2007. Sales to General
Motors increased to $45.0 million in 2008 from $35.7 million in 2007. The increase was due to
higher product content on certain General Motors vehicles, the takeover of certain passenger car
lockset production from another supplier and price adjustments received to partially recover raw
material cost increases (these price concessions are described in greater detail below), which we
experienced last year. These increases were partially offset by production reductions as a direct
result of a strike called by the UAW against a major General Motors supplier and lower vehicle
production volumes for trucks and SUVs. Sales to Ford Motor Company were $19.4 million during 2008
compared to $21.0 million during 2007 due to lower Ford vehicle production volumes. Sales to
Chrysler LLC decreased to $40.2 million during 2008 from $58.1 million during 2007 due to a
combination of reduced component content in the products we supply and lower vehicle production
volumes. Sales to Delphi Corporation were $14.9 million during 2008 compared to $18.4 million
during 2007. This decrease was primarily due to reduced component content and lower production
volumes, somewhat offset by price adjustments received to partially recover raw material cost
increases experienced last year. The impact of the above mentioned strike reduced sales to General
Motors and Delphi Corporation by approximately $3.5 million in 2008. Sales of ignition lock
housings to other Tier 1 suppliers increased $4.3 million in 2008 compared to 2007. Sales related
to our joint venture with ADAC Automotive totaled $5.2 million in 2008, which includes $3.3 million
of sales to our largest customers discussed above. This joint venture was not in full operation
during all of 2007.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 15.5 percent in 2008 compared to 15.8 percent in
2007. The gross profit margin was favorably impacted by lower purchased raw material costs for
zinc, cost reductions resulting from the move of our service product assembly operation from our
Milwaukee, Wisconsin facility to our Juarez, Mexico facilities and price increases received from
some of our customers to recover the higher purchased raw material costs we experienced in 2007 as
discussed above in connection with our net sales. In addition, 2007 included a charge for severance
and separation costs related to the service product assembly operation move which reduced our gross
profit margin by $366,000. The move of the service product assembly operation took place in January
2007. The overall increase in the gross profit margin was offset by reductions in our customers
vehicle production volumes during the last six months of 2008 which lowered overhead absorption of
our manufacturing costs. In addition, 2008 included a lump sum bonus totaling $243,000 paid to our
Milwaukee represented hourly workers resulting from a new four-year labor contract ratified on June
22, 2008 as well as the disposal of a customer specific fixed asset resulting in a fixed asset
disposal loss of $382,000. The average zinc price paid per pound decreased to $1.53 in 2008 from
$1.77 in 2007. During 2008, we used approximately 7.7 million pounds of zinc. This resulted in
decreased zinc costs of approximately $1.8 million in 2008 compared to 2007. Given the significant
financial impact on us relating to changes in the cost of our primary raw materials, commencing
with fiscal 2008, we began quoting quarterly material price adjustments for changes in our raw
material costs in our negotiations with our customers. Our success in obtaining these quarterly
price adjustments in our customer contracts is dependant on separate negotiations with each
customer. It is not a standard practice for our customers to include such price adjustments in
their contracts. We have been successful in obtaining quarterly price adjustments in some of our
customer contracts. However, we have not been successful in obtaining the adjustments with all of
our customers.
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses were $24.0 million in 2008 compared to $20.2
million in 2007. The increased expense was attributed to hiring additional engineers to support new
product development and new customer programs that were under launch.
Income from operations decreased to $805,000 in 2008 from $6.3 million in 2007. This decrease
was primarily the result of reductions in our net sales and increases in our operating expenses as
discussed above.
Other income, net, decreased $485,000 to $230,000 in 2008. The reduction is primarily due to a
loss of $174,000 related to our Rabbi Trust during 2008 compared to a gain of $450,000 in 2007. The
Rabbi Trust funds our supplemental executive retirement plan. In addition, our equity in earnings
from joint ventures increased to $561,000 during 2008 from $394,000 during 2007.
Our effective tax rate in both 2008 and 2007 was not our normal effective income tax rate of
37.0 percent. Our effective income tax rate for 2008 was 25.0 percent compared to 23.6 percent in
2007. The 2008 provision included a favorable tax adjustment primarily
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
related to Mexican tax
benefits allowed for our Mexican subsidiaries. The favorable adjustment totaled $573,000. In addition, reduced 2008 earnings resulted in a larger percentage of
our consolidated taxable income being taxed in Mexico, which has a lower effective rate as compared
to the U.S. rate. The 2007 provision included a state refund claim recovery and a favorable tax
adjustment primarily related to foreign tax adjustments. The claim recovery, net of the Federal
income tax impact, was $329,000. The favorable tax adjustment totaled $1.1 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary source of cash flow is from our major customers, which include General Motors
Corporation, Ford Motor Company and Chrysler LLC. A summary of our outstanding receivable balances
from our major customers as of June 28, 2009 is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
Canada
|
|
Mexico
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
General Motors
|
|
$
|
6,814
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
7,029
|
|
Ford
|
|
$
|
2,192
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,376
|
|
Chrysler
|
|
$
|
1,599
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
2,627
|
|
As discussed under results of operations, our two largest customers, Chrysler and General
Motors, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for their U.S. legal entities in our quarter
ended June 28, 2009. As a result of the filing, Chrysler shut down all of its North American
manufacturing facilities during May and June. General Motors also had plant shutdowns idling a
significant amount of its North American plant capacity for the purpose of reducing its retail
inventory of new vehicles. These reductions in production will negatively impact our cash flow from
operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. However, we believe that our existing cash
balances along with our Line of Credit, which is discussed below, is adequate to meet our
anticipated capital expenditure, working capital and operating expenditure requirements. A
provision for doubtful accounts of $500,000 was recorded in our current year in connection with
these bankruptcy filings. The Chrysler and General Motors bankruptcy filings did not significantly
impact the collection of pre-bankruptcy receivable balances as both companies were able to continue
making payments to suppliers for parts they had purchased prior to their bankruptcy filings. While
a majority of our receivables from both Chrysler and General Motors have been paid under normal
terms, there remain some minor past-due pre-bankruptcy receivable balances still outstanding. We
expect these to be resolved or adequately accounted for through the reserve recorded in our third
quarter. Subsequently, both companies emerged from bankruptcy and started to resume production in
July.
The Ford Motor Company has been able to avoid a bankruptcy filing to date by restructuring
their operations, reducing their work force and by obtaining concessions from both their unionized
work force and debt holders. The above actions taken by the Ford Motor Company do not assure that a
bankruptcy filing or request for financial assistance from the U.S. Government will not occur in
the near future. Any bankruptcy filing or assistance from the U.S. Government could negatively
impact the revenues we generate from sales of our products to Ford as well as the resulting cash
flow.
Cash flow used in operating activities was $6.8 million in 2009 compared to cash provided by
operating activities of $3.8 million in 2008. Current year operating cash flow was negatively
impacted by our overall financial results and the initial funding of working capital related to the
SPA operations. Pension contributions to our qualified plan totaled $3 million in 2009 and $5
million in 2008.
On February 26, 2009, our Board of Directors took action to suspend payment of our quarterly
dividend to conserve cash. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2009 approximately $1.5
million of cash dividends were paid to our shareholders.
Our 2008 prepaid pension obligations relate to our qualified pension plan. The 2009 balance
related to the qualified plan is a liability of $14.5 million and is included in Accrued Pension
Obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the balance during 2009 is the result
of the net impact of pension contributions, the actuarially calculated pension expense for each
year and the impact of the recognition of the funded status of the plan. The 2009 pre-tax funded
status adjustment increased our liability position by $17.8 million at June 28, 2009. We anticipate
pension contributions will be approximately $4 million in 2010 to fund
the underfunded status of our qualified pension plan.
Capital expenditures were $12.5 million in 2009 compared to $10.9 million in 2008.
Expenditures were primarily in support of requirements for new product programs, the upgrade and
replacement of existing equipment and the construction of a new building in Juarez, Mexico to
replace a leased facility. We anticipate capital expenditures will be approximately $5 million in
fiscal 2010 in support of requirements for new product programs and the upgrade and replacement of
existing equipment.
Our Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase program to buy back outstanding
shares of our common stock. Shares authorized for repurchase under the program totaled 3,839,395 at
June 28, 2009. Over the life of the repurchase program through June 28, 2009, a total of 3,655,322
shares have been repurchased at a cost of approximately $136.4 million. During fiscal year 2009,
193,989 shares were repurchased at a cost of approximately $6.2 million. Additional repurchases may
occur from time to time and
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
are expected to continue to be funded by cash flow from operations and current cash balances.
Based on the current economic environment and our preference to conserve cash, we anticipate
minimal or no stock repurchase activity in fiscal year 2010.
We have a $50 million short-term, unsecured line of credit (Line of Credit) with M&I
Marshall & Ilsley Bank which expires October 31, 2009. Interest on borrowings under the Line
of Credit is at varying rates based on the London Interbank Offering Rate or the banks prime
rate. There were no outstanding borrowings at June 28, 2009 or June 29, 2008. There were no
borrowings under any third party debt facilities during 2009, 2008 or 2007. The Line of Credit
is not subject to any covenants. We are also in process of negotiating a new Line of Credit
and anticipate this facility to be renewed but at a reduced available borrowing amount. We
believe the Line of Credit is adequate, along with cash flow from operations, to meet our
anticipated capital expenditure, working capital and operating expenditure requirements as we
manage our business through these unusually low automotive vehicle production levels.
Over the past several years, we have been impacted by rising health care costs, which
have increased our cost of employee medical coverage. A portion of these increases have been
offset by plan design changes and employee wellness initiatives. We have also been impacted by
increases in the market price of zinc, brass and magnesium and inflation in Mexico, which
impacts the U.S. dollar costs of our Mexican operations. We have negotiated raw material price
adjustment clauses with certain customers to offset some of the market price fluctuations. We
do not hedge against our Mexican peso exposure.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Contractual obligations are as follows as of June 28, 2009 (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligation
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
13 Years
|
|
|
35 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
$
|
2,784
|
|
|
$
|
645
|
|
|
$
|
1,150
|
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
Other Purchase Obligations
|
|
|
9,997
|
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and
Postretirement
Obligations
(a)
|
|
|
7,492
|
|
|
|
7,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
20,273
|
|
|
$
|
16,078
|
|
|
$
|
3,206
|
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
As disclosed in our Notes to Financial Statements, estimated cash funding
related to our pension and postretirement benefit plans totals $7.5 million in 2010. Because
the timing of funding related to these plans beyond 2010 is uncertain, and is dependent on
future movements in interest rates and investment returns, changes in laws and regulations,
and other variables, pension and postretirement outflows beyond 2010 have not been included
in the table above.
|
Liabilities recognized for uncertain tax benefits of $1.2 million are not presented in
the table above due to uncertainty as to amounts and timing regarding future payments.
JOINT VENTURES
We participate in certain Alliance Agreements with WITTE Automotive (WITTE) and ADAC
Automotive (ADAC). WITTE, of Velbert, Germany, is a privately held automotive supplier.
WITTE designs, manufactures and markets components including locks and keys, hood latches,
rear compartment latches, seat back latches, door handles and specialty fasteners. WITTEs
primary market for these products has been Europe. ADAC, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, is a
privately held automotive supplier and manufactures engineered products, including door
handles and other automotive trim parts, utilizing plastic injection molding, automated
painting and various assembly processes.
The Alliance provides a set of cross-licensing agreements for the manufacture,
distribution and sale of WITTE products by STRATTEC and ADAC in North America, and the
manufacture, distribution and sale of STRATTEC and ADAC products by WITTE in Europe.
Additionally, a joint
venture company, Vehicle Access Systems Technology LLC (VAST LLC), in which WITTE,
STRATTEC and ADAC each hold a one-third interest, exists to seek opportunities to
manufacture and sell the companies products in areas of the world outside of North America
and Europe.
VAST LLC participates in joint ventures in Brazil and China. VAST do Brasil, a joint
venture between VAST LLC and Ifer do Brasil Ltda., was formed to service customers in South
America. VAST Fuzhou and VAST Great Shanghai, joint ventures between VAST LLC, Fortitude
Corporation and a unit of Elitech Technology Co. Ltd. of Taiwan, are the base of operations
to service our automotive customers in the Asian market. VAST LLC also maintains branch
offices in South Korea and Japan in support of customer sales and engineering requirements.
The VAST investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The
activities related to the VAST joint ventures resulted in equity in earnings of joint
ventures to STRATTEC of approximately $245,000 during 2009 and $561,000 during 2008. During
the current year, the VAST partners made capital contributions to VAST totaling
approximately $1.7 million in support of general operating expenses. STRATTECs portion of
the capital contributions totaled $551,000.
In fiscal year 2007, we entered into a joint venture with ADAC, in which STRATTEC holds
a 50.1 percent interest and ADAC holds a 49.9 percent interest. The joint venture was
created to establish injection molding and door handle assembly operations in Mexico.
ADAC-STRATTEC LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed on October 27, 2006. An
additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Mexican entity, ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico, which is wholly owned by ADAC-STRATTEC LLC, was formed on
February 21, 2007. ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico production activities began in July 2007. ADAC-STRATTEC
LLCs financial results are consolidated with the financial results of STRATTEC and resulted in no
change in net income to STRATTEC in 2009 and increased net income to STRATTEC of $26,000 in 2008.
As previously noted, effective November 30, 2008, STRATTEC and WITTE established a new
subsidiary, STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC, which is 80 percent owned by STRATTEC and 20 percent owned
by WITTE. STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC operates the North American portion of the Power Products
business which was acquired from Delphi Corporation.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment to ARB No. 51. SFAS
No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified and presented in the
consolidated balance sheets within equity, but separate from the parents equity, the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest be clearly
identified and presented on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and changes in a
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its
subsidiary be accounted for consistently. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008 and will be effective for us beginning in fiscal 2010. We do not expect the
new standard to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R)
retains the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are required to
be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting, but SFAS No. 141(R)
changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of aspects. SFAS No. 141(R)
requires that (1) for all business combinations, the acquirer record all assets and liabilities of
the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at their fair values; (2) certain contingent
assets and liabilities acquired be recognized at their fair value on the acquisition date; (3)
contingent consideration be recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date and, for certain
arrangements, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings when settled; (4) acquisition
related transaction and restructuring costs be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of
the acquisition and included in the amount recorded for assets acquired; (5) in step acquisitions,
previous equity interests in an acquiree held prior to obtaining control be remeasured to their
acquisition date fair values, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings; and (6) when making
adjustments to finalize initial accounting, companies revise any previously issued post-acquisition
financial information in future financial statements to reflect any adjustments as if they had been
recorded on the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109
such that the adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of this
statement should also apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R). This standard will be applied to all
future business combinations in accordance with the effective dates as early adoption is
prohibited.
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 132R-1, Employers
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets, which significantly expands the disclosures
required by employers for postretirement plan assts. The FSP requires plan sponsors to provide
extensive new disclosures about assets in defined benefit postretirement benefit plans as well as
any concentrations of associated risks. In addition, the FSP requires new disclosures similar to
those in FASB Statement 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, in terms of the three-level fair value
hierarchy, including a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of plan assets that fall
within Level 3 of the hierarchy. FSP FAS 132R-1 is effective for periods ending after December 15,
2009. The disclosure requirements are annual and do not apply to interim financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement 165,
Subsequent Events
, to incorporate the accounting
and disclosure requirements for subsequent events into U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Statement 165 introduces new terminology, defines a date through which management must
evaluate subsequent events, and lists the circumstances under which an entity must recognize and
disclose events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date. We adopted Statement 165 as
of June 28, 2009. We evaluated our June 28, 2009
financial statements for subsequent events through August 4, 2009, the date the financial
statements were available to be issued. We are not aware of any subsequent events which would
require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
In June 2009, FASB issued, Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-1, Topic 105 Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles amendments based on the Statement of Financial Standards No. 168 the FASB
Accounting Standard Codifications and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 168, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
19
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 62. The Accounting Standards
Update and SFAS No. 168 make the FASB Codification the authoritative source of GAAP. The FASB
Codification is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009.
We will update GAAP referencing for our September 27, 2009 Form 10-Q. The FASB Codification is not
expected to have a material impact on our financial reporting.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We believe the following represents our critical accounting policies:
Pension and Postretirement Health Benefits
Pension and postretirement health obligations and
costs are developed from actuarial valuations. The determination of the obligation and expense for
pension and postretirement health benefits is dependent on the selection of certain assumptions
used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. Those assumptions are described in the Notes to
Financial Statements and include, among others, the discount rate, expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets, retirement age and rates of increase in compensation and health care costs.
We evaluate and update all of the assumptions annually on June 30, the measurement date. Refer to
Notes to Financial Statements for the impact of the pension and postretirement plans on the
financial statements.
We determine the discount rate used to measure plan liabilities using prevailing market rates
of a large population of high-quality, non-callable, corporate bonds currently available that, if
the obligation was settled at the measurement date, would provide the necessary future cash flows
to pay the benefit obligation when due. Using this methodology, we determined a discount rate of
6.86 percent to be appropriate as of June 30, 2009, which is a decrease of .27 percentage points
from the rate used at June 30, 2008. The impact of this change decreased our year-end 2009
projected pension benefit obligations by approximately $2.3 million, the year-end 2009 accumulated
pension benefit obligations by approximately $2.1 million and the year-end 2009 accumulated
postretirement obligation by approximately $164,000. This change is also expected to decrease our
2010 pension expense by $247,000 and is not expected to have an impact on the postretirement
expense.
As of June 30, 2009, we decreased the salary scale from 3.5% to 3%. The impact of this change
decreased our year-end 2009 projected pension benefit obligations by approximately $652,000 and
increased our year-end 2009 accumulated pension benefit obligations by approximately $253,000. This
change is also expected to decrease our 2010 pension expense by $179,000.
As of June 30, 2008, we increased the assumed probability of early retirement for eligible
associates with at least 30 years of service. The impact of this change increased our year-end 2008
projected pension benefit obligations by approximately $2.2 million, the year-end 2008 accumulated
pension benefit obligations by approximately $2.8 million and the year-end 2008 accumulated
postretirement obligation by approximately $470,000. This change also increased our 2009 pension
expense by $370,000 and postretirement expense by $120,000.
As of June 30, 2007, we converted to the RP 2000 Mortality Table projected to 2014 for
annuitants and 2022 for non-annuitants for calculating the year-end 2007 pension and postretirement
obligations. The impact of this change increased our year-end 2007 projected pension benefit
obligations by $2.4 million, the year-end 2007 accumulated pension benefit obligations by $2.1
million and the year-end 2007 accumulated postretirement obligation by $85,000. This change
increased our 2008 pension expense by $462,000 and postretirement expense by $10,000.
A significant element in determining the pension expense in accordance with SFAS No. 87 and
SFAS No. 158 is the expected return on plan assets. Our assumption for the expected return on plan
assets is based on historical results for similar allocations among asset classes and was 8.5
percent for 2008, 8.25 percent for 2009 and was reduced to 8.0 percent for 2010. This reduced the
expected return on plan assets by approximately $200,000 in both 2009 and 2010. Refer to Notes to
Financial Statements for additional information on how this rate was determined.
The difference between the expected return and actual return on plan assets is deferred and,
under certain circumstances, amortized over future years of service. Therefore, the deferral of
past asset gains and losses ultimately affects future pension expense. This is also the case with
changes to actuarial assumptions. As of June 30, 2009, we had $36.2 million of net unrecognized
pension actuarial losses, which includes deferred asset losses of $19.3 million. As of June 30,
2009, we had unrecognized postretirement actuarial losses of $10.1 million. These amounts represent
potential future pension and post-retirement expenses that would be amortized over average future
service periods. The average remaining service period is about
11 years for the pension plans and 13 years for the postretirement plan.
During fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, we contributed $3 million, $5 million and $7 million,
respectively, to our qualified pension plan. Future pension contributions are expected to be $3 to
$4 million annually depending on market conditions. We have evaluated the potential impact of the
Pension Protection Act (the Act), which was passed into law on August 17, 2006, on future pension
plan funding requirements based on current market conditions. The Act has not had and is not
anticipated to have in future periods a material effect on our level of future funding requirements
or on our liquidity and capital resources.
A significant element in determining the postretirement health expense in accordance with SFAS
No. 106 is the health care cost trend rates. We develop these rates based on historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
20
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
cost data, the near-term outlook and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Changes in the
health care cost trend rate assumption will have a significant effect on the post-retirement
benefit amounts reported. Refer to Notes to Financial Statements for an analysis of the impact of a
one percent change in the trend rate.
While we believe that the assumptions used are appropriate, significant differences in the
actual experience or significant changes in the assumptions may materially affect our pension and
postretirement health obligations and future expense.
Other Reserves
We have reserves such as an environmental reserve, an incurred but not
reported claim reserve for self-insured health plans, a workers compensation reserve, an allowance
for doubtful accounts related to trade accounts receivable and a repair and maintenance supply
parts reserve. These reserves require the use of estimates and judgment with regard to risk
exposure, ultimate liability and net realizable value.
Environmental Reserve We have a liability recorded related to the estimated costs to
remediate a site at our Milwaukee facility, which was contaminated by a solvent spill from a former
above ground solvent storage tank occurring in 1985. The recorded environmental liability balance
involves judgment and estimates. Our reserve estimate is based on a third party assessment of the
costs to adequately cover the cost of active remediation of the contamination at this site. Actual
costs might vary from this estimate for a variety of reasons including changes in laws and changes
in the assessment of the level of remediation actually required at this site. Therefore, future
changes in laws or the assessment of the level of remediation required could result in changes in
our estimate of the required liability. Refer to the discussion of Commitments and Contingencies
included in the Notes to Financial Statements on page 37 of this 2009 Annual Report.
Incurred But Not Reported Claim Reserve for Self-Insured Health plans and Workers
Compensation Reserve We have self-insured medical and dental plans covering all eligible U.S.
associates. We also maintain an insured workers compensation program covering all U.S. associates.
The insurance is renewed annually and may be covered under a loss sensitive plan. Under a loss
sensitive plan, the ultimate cost is dependent upon losses incurred during the policy period. The
incurred loss amount for loss sensitive policies will continue to change as claims develop and are
settled in future periods. The expected ultimate cost of claims incurred under these plans is
subject to judgment and estimation. We estimate the ultimate expected cost of claims incurred under
these plans based upon the aggregate liability for reported claims and an estimated additional
liability for claims incurred but not reported. Our estimate of claims incurred but not reported is
based on an analysis of historical data, current trends related to claims and health care costs and
information available from the insurance carrier. Actual ultimate costs may vary from estimates due
to variations in actual claims experience from past trends and large unexpected claims being filed.
Therefore, changes in claims experience and large unexpected claims could result in changes to our
estimate of the claims incurred but not reported liabilities. Refer to the discussion of Self
Insurance and Loss Sensitive Plans under Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies included in Notes to Financial Statements on page 33 of this 2009 Annual Report.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Related to Trade Accounts Receivable Our trade accounts
receivable consist primarily of receivables due from Original Equipment Manufacturers in the
automotive industry and locksmith distributors relating to our service and aftermarket business.
Our evaluation of the collectability of our trade accounts receivable involves judgment and
estimates and includes a review of past due items, general economic conditions and the economic
climate of the industry as a whole. The estimate of the required reserve involves uncertainty as to
future collectability of receivable balances. This uncertainty is magnified by the financial
difficulty currently experienced by our customers as discussed under Risk-Factors-Loss of
Significant Customers, Vehicle Content, Vehicle Models and Market Share on page 22 of this 2009
Annual Report. Refer to the discussion of Receivables under Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies included in Notes to Financial Statements on page 30 of this 2009 Annual
Report. We increased our allowance for uncollectible trade accounts receivable by $500,000 during
2009 in connection with Chrysler LLCs filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for certain of
their U.S. legal entities on April 30, 2009. General Motors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for
their U.S. legal entities on June 1, 2009. The bankruptcy filings did not significantly impact the
collection of pre-bankruptcy receivable balances as both Companies were able to continue to make
payments to suppliers for parts they had purchased prior to their bankruptcy filings. While a
majority of our receivables from both Chrysler and General Motors have been paid under normal
terms, there remain some minor past-due pre-
bankruptcy receivable balances still outstanding. We expect these to be resolved or adequately
accounted for through the reserve recorded in 2009.
Repair and Maintenance Supply Parts Reserve We maintain an inventory of repair and
maintenance parts in support of operations. The inventory includes critical repair parts for all
production equipment as well as general maintenance items. The inventory of critical repair parts
is required to avoid disruptions in our customers just-in-time production schedules due to lack of
spare parts when equipment break-downs occur. Depending on maintenance requirements during the life
of the equipment, excess quantities of repair parts arise. A repair and maintenance supply parts
reserve is maintained to recognize the normal adjustment of inventory for obsolete and slow-moving
repair and maintenance supply parts. Our evaluation of the reserve level involves judgment and
estimates, which are based on a review of historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
21
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
obsolescence and current inventory levels. Actual obsolescence may differ from estimates due to
actual maintenance requirements differing from historical levels. This could result in changes to
our estimated required reserve. Refer to the discussion of Repair and Maintenance Supply Parts
under Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the Notes to
Financial Statements on page 31 of this 2009 Annual Report.
We believe the reserves discussed above are estimated using consistent and appropriate
methods. However, changes to the assumptions could materially affect the recorded reserves.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No.
123(R), Share Based Payments. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement,
share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is
recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at
the grant date requires judgment, including estimating future volatility of our stock, the amount
of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited and the expected term of awards granted. We
estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We
amortize the fair value of all awards on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods. The
expected term of awards granted represents the period of time they are expected to be outstanding.
We determine the expected term based on historical experience with similar awards, giving
consideration to the contractual terms and vesting schedules. We estimate the expected volatility
of our common stock at the date of grant based on the historical volatility of our common stock.
The volatility factor used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model is based on our historical
stock prices over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected term of the
award. We base the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model on the
implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term
commensurate with the expected term of the award. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting
option forfeitures. We record stock-based compensation only for those awards that are expected to
vest. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense
and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
RISK FACTORS
We recognize we are subject to the following risk factors based on our operations and the
nature of the automotive industry in which we operate:
Loss of Significant Customers, Vehicle Content, Vehicle Models and Market Share
Sales to
General Motors Company, Ford Motor Company, Chrysler Group LLC and Delphi Corporation represent
approximately 75 percent of our annual net sales and, accordingly, these customers account for a
significant percentage of our outstanding accounts receivable. The contracts with these customers
provide for supplying the customers requirements for a particular model. The contracts do not
specify a specific quantity of parts. The contracts typically cover the life of a model, which
averages approximately four to five years. Components for certain customer models may also be
market tested annually. Therefore, the loss of any one of these customers, the loss of a contract
for a specific vehicle model, reduction in vehicle content, early cancellation of a specific
vehicle model, technological changes or a significant reduction in demand for certain key models
could occur, and if so, could have a material adverse effect on our existing and future revenues
and net income.
On April 27, 2009, General Motors announced certain aspects of its Revised Viability Plan
including reduced production volumes for calendar year 2009 and the subsequent five years. The
announcement indicated that certain vehicle brands, including Pontiac, Saturn, Hummer and Saab,
will be discontinued or sold. In addition, subsequent to Chrysler LLCs filing for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection on April 30, 2009, they implemented temporary plant shutdowns for May and
June and announced certain vehicle models planned for discontinuation (Jeep Commander, Dodge Nitro,
Dodge Avenger, Dodge Durango, Dodge Dakota, Chrysler Sebring, Chrysler Aspen, etc.). Subsequently
certain of these models have been reaffirmed for continued production over the next two years. We
will be evaluating the impact these evolving plans will have on our business as more details become
available.
Our major customers also have significant underfunded legacy liabilities related to pension
and postretirement health care obligations. The future impact of these items along with a
continuing loss in their North American automotive market share to the New Domestic automotive
manufacturers (primarily the Japanese automotive manufacturers) and/or a significant decline in the
overall market demand for new vehicles may ultimately result in severe financial difficulty for
these customers, including bankruptcy. If our major customers cannot fund their operations, we may
incur significant write-offs of accounts receivable, incur impairment charges or require additional
restructuring actions. For example, on October 8, 2005, Delphi Corporation filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection. As a result, we wrote-off
$1.6 million of uncollectible pre-petition Chapter 11 accounts receivable due from Delphi
Corporation. This directly reduced our pre-tax net income during fiscal 2006. On April 30, 2009,
Chrysler LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for certain of their U.S. legal entities.
As discussed under Critical Accounting Policies Other Reserves Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Related to Trade Accounts Receivable herein, during 2009 we recorded a provision for bad debts of
$500,000 related to this filing. This directly reduced our pre-tax net income during 2009.
Production Slowdowns for Customers
Our major customers and many of their
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
22
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
suppliers have been significantly impacted by the slowing economy. Many of our major customers have
instituted production cut backs during fiscal 2009. Moreover, certain of our major customers have
announced plans to continue these production cut backs into future fiscal years. For example,
during April 2009, General Motors Corporation announced assembly plant downtime for the months of
May through July in order to reduce excess inventories at their dealer locations. Most of the
190,000 vehicles removed from General Motors production schedules are those that we supply.
Consequently, this downtime reduced our production schedules and affected both our sales and
profitability for our fiscal fourth quarter ending June 28, 2009. Additionally, on April 27, 2009,
General Motors announced some aspects of its Revised Viability Plan including reduced production
volumes for the remainder of calendar 2009 and the subsequent five calendar years. The continuation
of these production cut backs could have a material adverse effect on our existing and future
revenues and net income.
Financial Distress of Automotive Supply Base
Automotive industry conditions have adversely
affected STRATTEC and our supply base. Lower production levels for our major customers, increases
in certain raw material and energy costs and the global credit market crisis have resulted in
severe financial distress among many companies within the automotive supply base. Several
automotive suppliers have filed for bankruptcy protection or ceased operations. The continuation of
financial distress within the supply base and suppliers inability to obtain credit from lending
institutions may lead to commercial disputes and possible supply chain interruptions. In addition,
the adverse industry environment may require us to take measures to ensure uninterrupted
production. The continuation or worsening of these industry conditions could have a material
adverse effect on our existing and future revenues and net income.
Cost Reduction
There is continuing pressure from our major customers to reduce the prices we
charge for our products. This requires us to generate cost reductions, including reductions in the
cost of components purchased from outside suppliers. If we are unable to generate sufficient
production cost savings in the future to offset pre-programmed price reductions, our gross margin
and profitability will be adversely affected.
Cyclicality and Seasonality in the Automotive Market
The automotive market is cyclical and
is dependent on consumer spending and to a certain extent on customer sales incentives. Economic
factors adversely affecting consumer demand for automobiles and automotive production, such as
rising fuel costs, could adversely impact our net sales and net income. We typically experience
decreased sales and operating income during the first fiscal quarter of each year due to the impact
of scheduled customer plant shut-downs in July and new model changeovers.
Foreign Operations
As discussed under Joint Ventures, we have joint venture investments in
Mexico, Brazil and China. These operations are currently not material. However, as these operations
expand, their success will depend, in part, on our and our partners ability to anticipate and
effectively manage certain risks inherent in international operations including: enforcing
agreements and collecting receivables through certain foreign legal systems, payment cycles of
foreign customers, compliance with foreign tax laws, general economic and political conditions in
these countries and compliance with foreign laws and regulations.
Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations
We incur a portion of our expenses in Mexican pesos.
Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso could have an adverse
effect on our financial results.
Sources of and Fluctuations in Market Prices of Raw Materials
Our primary raw materials are
high-grade zinc, brass, magnesium, aluminum, steel and plastic resins. These materials are
generally available from a number of suppliers, but we have chosen to concentrate our sourcing with
one primary vendor for each commodity or purchased component. We believe our sources of raw
materials are reliable and adequate for our needs. However, the development of future sourcing
issues related to using existing or alternative raw materials and the global availability of these
materials as well as significant fluctuations in the market prices of these materials may have an
adverse affect on our financial results if the increased raw material costs cannot be recovered
from our customers.
Given the significant financial impact on us relating to changes in the cost of our primary
raw materials, commencing with fiscal 2008, we began quoting quarterly material price adjustments
for changes in our raw material costs in our negotiations with our customers. Our success in
obtaining these quarterly price adjustments in our customer contracts is dependant
on separate negotiations with each customer. It is not a standard practice for our customers
to include such price adjustments in their contracts. We have been successful in obtaining
quarterly price adjustments in some of our customer contracts. However, we have not been successful
in obtaining the adjustments with all of our customers.
Disruptions Due to Work Stoppages and Other Labor Matters
Our major customers and many of
their suppliers have unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slowdowns experienced by our
customers or their suppliers could result in slow-downs or closures of assembly plants where our
products are included in assembled vehicles. For example, strikes by a critical supplier and the
United Auto Workers led to extended shut-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
23
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
downs of most of General Motors Corporations North American assembly plants in February 2008 and
1998. A material work stoppage experienced by one or more of our customers could have an adverse
effect on our business and our financial results. In addition, all production associates at our
Milwaukee facility are unionized. A sixteen-day strike by these associates in June 2001 resulted in
increased costs as all salaried associates worked with additional outside resources to produce the
components necessary to meet customer requirements. The current contract with the unionized
associates is effective through June 30, 2012. We may encounter further labor disruption after the
expiration date of this contract and may also encounter unionization efforts in our other plants or
other types of labor conflicts, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business and our
financial results.
Environmental and Safety Regulations
We are subject to Federal, state, local and foreign
laws and other legal requirements related to the generation, storage, transport, treatment and
disposal of materials as a result of our manufacturing and assembly operations. These laws include
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (as amended), the Clean Air Act (as amended) and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (as amended). We have an
environmental management system that is ISO-14001 certified. We believe that our existing
environmental management system is adequate for current and anticipated operations and we have no
current plans for substantial capital expenditures in the environmental area. An environmental
reserve was established in 1995 for estimated costs to remediate a site at our Milwaukee facility.
The site was contaminated by a former above-ground solvent storage tank, located on the east side
of the facility. The contamination occurred in 1985. This is being monitored in accordance with
Federal, state and local requirements. We do not currently anticipate any material adverse impact
on our results of operations, financial condition or competitive position as a result of compliance
with Federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws or other legal requirements. However,
risk of environmental liability and changes associated with maintaining compliance with
environmental laws is inherent in the nature of our business and there is no assurance that
material liabilities or changes could not arise.
Highly Competitive Automotive Supply Industry
The automotive component supply industry is
highly competitive. Some of our competitors are companies, or divisions or subsidiaries of
companies, that are larger than STRATTEC and have greater financial and technology capabilities.
Our products may not be able to compete successfully with the products of these other companies,
which could result in loss of customers and, as a result, decreased sales and profitability. Some
of our major customers have also announced that they will be reducing their supply base. This could
potentially result in the loss of these customers and consolidation within the supply base. The
loss of any of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our existing and future
net sales and net income.
In addition, our competitive position in the North American automotive component supply
industry could be adversely affected in the event that we are unsuccessful in making strategic
acquisitions, alliances or establishing joint ventures that would enable us to expand globally. We
principally compete for new business at the beginning of the development of new models and upon the
redesign of existing models by our major customers. New model development generally begins two to
five years prior to the marketing of such new models to the public. The failure to obtain new
business on new models or to retain or increase business on redesigned existing models could
adversely affect our business and financial results. In addition, as a result of relatively long
lead times for many of our components, it may be difficult in the short-term for us to obtain new
sales to replace any unexpected decline in the sale of existing products. Finally, we may incur
significant product development expense in preparing to meet anticipated customer requirements
which may not be recovered.
Program Volume and Pricing Fluctuations
We incur costs and make capital expenditures for new
program awards based upon certain estimates of production volumes over the anticipated program life
for certain vehicles. While we attempt to establish the price of our products for variances in
production volumes, if the actual production of certain vehicle models is significantly less than
planned, our net sales and net income may be adversely affected. We cannot predict our customers
demands for the products we supply either in the aggregate or for particular reporting periods.
Investments in Customer Program Specific Assets
We make investments in machinery and
equipment used exclusively to manufacture products for specific customer programs. This machinery
and equipment is capitalized and depreciated over the expected useful life of each respective
asset. Therefore, the loss of any one of our major customers, the loss of
specific vehicle models or the early cancellation of a vehicle model could result in
impairment in the value of these assets and may have a material adverse effect on our financial
results.
Financial Industry / Credit Market Risk
The U.S. capital and credit markets have been
experiencing volatility and disruption for over a year. In many cases this has resulted in
pressures on borrowers and reduced credit availability from certain issuers without regard to the
underlying financial strength of the borrower or issuer. If current levels of financial market
disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that such conditions will
not have an effect on the Companys ability to access debt and, in turn, result in a material
adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
24
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
|
July 1, 2007
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
$
|
126,097
|
|
|
$
|
159,642
|
|
|
$
|
167,707
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
112,857
|
|
|
|
134,875
|
|
|
|
141,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
13,240
|
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
|
|
26,520
|
|
Engineering, selling, and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
25,480
|
|
|
|
23,962
|
|
|
|
20,189
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts, net
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(12,740
|
)
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
6,331
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR
INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(10,323
|
)
|
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
|
10,732
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
$
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,781
|
|
|
$
|
8,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC
|
|
$
|
(1.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED
|
|
$
|
(1.86
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
DILUTED
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
3,494
|
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
The years ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 have been retrospectively adjusted for our change in
2009 from the last-in, first-out method of inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out method.
Additional details are available in Notes to Financial Statements.
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
25
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22,764
|
|
|
$
|
51,501
|
|
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $750 at June 28, 2009 and $250 at June 29, 2008
|
|
|
17,235
|
|
|
|
23,518
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
16,589
|
|
|
|
14,314
|
|
Customer tooling in progress
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
3,914
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
Income taxes recoverable
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10,951
|
|
|
|
8,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
72,558
|
|
|
|
105,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
13,143
|
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
PREPAID PENSION OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
|
|
36,936
|
|
|
|
30,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
128,189
|
|
|
$
|
144,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
11,369
|
|
|
$
|
15,974
|
|
Accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and benefits
|
|
|
8,232
|
|
|
|
7,319
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,611
|
|
|
|
6,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
30,848
|
|
|
|
32,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
see note on page 37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BORROWINGS UNDER LINE OF CREDIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCRUED PENSION OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
15,183
|
|
|
|
2,606
|
|
ACCRUED POSTRETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
9,601
|
|
|
|
9,783
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, authorized 12,000,000 shares, $.01 par value,
issued 6,897,957 shares at June 28, 2009 and
6,887,757 shares at June 29, 2008
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
79,247
|
|
|
|
78,885
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
159,285
|
|
|
|
166,397
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(31,094
|
)
|
|
|
(17,495
|
)
|
Less: Treasury stock at cost (3,635,989 shares at
June 28, 2009 and 3,444,548 shares at June 29, 2008)
|
|
|
(136,089
|
)
|
|
|
(129,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
71,418
|
|
|
|
97,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
128,189
|
|
|
$
|
144,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 balances have been retrospectively adjusted for our change in
2009 from the last-in, first-out method of inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out method.
Additional details are
available in Notes to Financial Statements.
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
26
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE JULY 2, 2006
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
77,175
|
|
|
$
|
160,723
|
|
|
$
|
(2,958
|
)
|
|
$
|
(121,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,199
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Minimum pension liability,
net of tax of $14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
and employee stock
purchases, including
tax benefit of $69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to initially adopt
SFAS No. 158:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service costs, net of
tax of $1363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses, net of tax of $8,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE JULY 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
78,122
|
|
|
$
|
168,922
|
|
|
$
|
(14,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126,818
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,781
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
Pension and postretirement
status adjustment, net of tax
of $2,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
($1.60 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,652
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation,
including tax benefit on
restricted
stock dividends of $13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE JUNE 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
78,885
|
|
|
$
|
166,397
|
|
|
$
|
(17,495
|
)
|
|
$
|
(129,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,122
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,485
|
)
|
Pension and postretirement
funded status adjustment,
net of tax of $6,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
($0.30 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation, including
tax benefit on restricted stock
dividends of $5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE JUNE 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
79,247
|
|
|
$
|
159,285
|
|
|
$
|
(31,094
|
)
|
|
$
|
(136,089
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The years ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 have been retrospectively adjusted for our change in
2009 from the last-in, first-out method of inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out method.
Additional details are available in Notes to Financial Statements.
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders Equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
27
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
|
July 1, 2007
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income
|
|
$
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,781
|
|
|
$
|
8,199
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to
net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
(780
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,264
|
|
|
|
6,830
|
|
|
|
6,988
|
|
Foreign Currency Transaction (Gain) Loss
|
|
|
(918
|
)
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Loss on disposition of property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
Tax benefit from options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
5,235
|
|
|
|
3,465
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
(2,319
|
)
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,966
|
)
|
|
|
(8,413
|
)
|
|
|
(7,277
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(7,326
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(1,937
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
(6,836
|
)
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
9,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in joint ventures
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(12,492
|
)
|
|
|
(10,930
|
)
|
|
|
(5,748
|
)
|
Purchase of Delphi Power Products
|
|
|
(4,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received on sale of property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
(10,930
|
)
|
|
|
(5,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(6,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,109
|
)
|
|
|
(5,075
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options and employee stock
purchases
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(1,511
|
)
|
|
|
(5,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loan from minority interest
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from minority interest
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(4,524
|
)
|
|
|
(6,814
|
)
|
|
|
(4,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOREIGN CURRENCY IMPACT ON CASH
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(28,737
|
)
|
|
|
(13,990
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
51,501
|
|
|
|
65,491
|
|
|
|
65,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
22,764
|
|
|
$
|
51,501
|
|
|
$
|
65,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (recovered) paid
|
|
$
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,238
|
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The years ended June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 have been retrospectively adjusted
for our change in 2009 from the last-in, first-out method of inventory accounting to
the first-in, first-out method. Additional details are available in Notes to
Financial Statements.
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
28
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION designs, develops, manufactures and markets automotive security
products including mechanical locks and keys, electronically enhanced locks and keys, steering
column and instrument panel ignition lock housings; and access control products including latches,
power sliding side door systems, power lift gate systems, power deck lid systems, door handles and
related access control products for North American automotive customers. We also supply global
automotive manufacturers through the VAST Alliance in which we participate with WITTE Automotive of
Velbert, Germany and ADAC Automotive of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Our products are shipped to
customer locations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe, South America, Korea and China,
and we provide full service and aftermarket support.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the consolidated results of
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, STRATTEC de Mexico, and its
majority owned subsidiaries, ADAC-STRATTEC, LLC and STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC. STRATTEC SECURITY
CORPORATION is located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. STRATTEC de Mexico is located in Juarez, Mexico.
ADAC-STRATTEC, LLC and STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC have operations in El Paso, Texas and Juarez,
Mexico. Equity investments in China and Brazil relating to the VAST LLC for which we exercise
significant influence but do not control and are not the primary beneficiary are accounted for
using the equity method. STRATTEC has only one reporting segment.
The significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of these financial statements,
as summarized in the following paragraphs, are in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP).
Purchase of Delphi Power Products Business:
Effective November 30, 2008, STRATTEC SECURITY
CORPORATION in combination with WITTE Automotive of Velbert, Germany, and Vehicle Access Systems
Technology LLC (VAST), a joint venture between STRATTEC, WITTE and ADAC Automotive of Grand Rapids,
Michigan, completed the acquisition of certain assets, primarily equipment and inventory, and
assumption of certain employee liabilities of Delphi Corporations global Power Products business
for approximately $7.3 million. For the purposes of owning and operating the North American portion
of this acquired business, STRATTEC established a new subsidiary, STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC (SPA),
which is 80 percent owned by STRATTEC and 20 percent owned by WITTE. The purchase price of the
North American portion of the acquired business totaled approximately $4.4 million, of which
STRATTEC paid approximately $3.5 million. WITTE acquired the European portion of the business for
approximately $2.4 million. Effective February 12, 2009, SPA acquired the Asian portion of the
business for approximately $500,000.
The acquisition of the North American and Asian portions of this business by SPA was not
material to STRATTECs consolidated financial statements. Amortizable intangible assets acquired
totaled $890,000 and are subject to amortization over a period of nine years. Goodwill of $223,000
was recorded as part of the transaction. The amortizable intangibles and goodwill are included in
Other Long-Term Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. All goodwill and other intangible assets
resulting from the purchase are expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The purchase accounting
was completed as of the end of fiscal 2009.
The operating results of SPA for the period December 1, 2008 through June 28, 2009 are
consolidated with the financial results of STRATTEC and resulted in increased net loss to STRATTEC
of approximately $2.1 million during the year ended June 28, 2009.
SPA designs, develops, tests, manufactures, markets and sells power systems to operate vehicle
sliding side doors and rear compartment access points such as liftgates and trunk lids. In
addition, the product line includes power cinching latches and cinching strikers used in these
systems. Current customers for these products supplied from North America are Chrysler LLC, Hyundai
Motor Company, General Motors and Ford.
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation:
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, its wholly owned Mexican
subsidiaries, and its majority owned subsidiaries. Equity investments for which STRATTEC exercises
significant influence but does not control and is not the primary beneficiary are accounted for
using the equity method. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Reclassifications:
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2007 and 2008
financial statements to conform to the 2009 presentation, including the impact of a change in
accounting for inventories from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to the first-in,
first-out method (FIFO). Additional details are included under Inventories herein.
Fiscal Year:
Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest June 30. The years ended June 28,
2009, June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007 are each comprised of 52 weeks.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses for the periods presented. These estimates and assumptions could
also affect the disclosure of contingencies. Actual results and outcomes may differ from
managements estimates and assumptions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents include all short-term investments with
an original maturity of three months or less due to the short-term nature of the instruments.
Excess cash balances are placed in a money market account at a high quality financial institution
and in short-term commercial paper.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The fair value of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and accounts payable approximated book value as of June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008. Fair
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
29
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Value is defined under SFAS No. 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid for a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation
techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS No. 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard established a fair value hierarchy based
on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last
unobservable. Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. These
are typically obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving
identical assets. Level 2 Inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These are typically obtained
from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments. Level 3 Unobservable inputs,
where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the
reporting entitys own assumptions of the data that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability, based on the best information available in the circumstances. The following
table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
in accordance with SFAS No. 157 as of June 28, 2009 (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Rabbi Trust assets
|
|
$
|
3,534
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,534
|
|
|
The Rabbi Trust assets fund our supplemental executive retirement plan and are included in
Other Current Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Assets held in the trust include U.S.
Treasury securities and large, medium and small-cap index funds.
Receivables:
Receivables consist primarily of trade receivables due from Original Equipment
Manufacturers in the automotive industry and locksmith distributors relating to our service and
aftermarket business. We evaluate the collectability of receivables based on a number of factors.
An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded for significant past due receivable balances based
on a review of the past due items, general economic conditions and the industry as a whole. We
increased our allowance for uncollectible trade accounts receivable by $500,000 as of March 29,
2009 in connection with Chrysler LLCs filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for certain of
their U.S. legal entities on April 30, 2009. Prior to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, we had been
accepted into the United States Department of Treasury Auto Supplier Support Program relating to
our open accounts receivable with Chrysler LLC. Based on information currently available, we
believe the increase in our reserve is adequate to cover the potential loss exposure related to our
trade accounts receivable from Chrysler LLC as of June 28, 2009. Changes in the allowance for
doubtful accounts are as follows (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Charged to
|
|
Balances
|
|
End of
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
Expense
|
|
Written Off
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
Year ended June 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
Year ended July 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
Inventories:
Inventories are comprised of material, direct labor and manufacturing overhead,
and are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method of
accounting. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2009, the majority of the inventories were accounted for
using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of accounting. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we
changed the method of accounting for this inventory from the LIFO method to the FIFO method. We
believe the FIFO method is a preferable method which better reflects the current cost of inventory
on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. After this change, all our inventories will have a consistent
inventory costing method. All periods have been retrospectively adjusted on a FIFO basis in
accordance with SFAS No. 154. Inventories consist of the following on a FIFO basis (thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
Finished products
|
|
$
|
3,812
|
|
|
$
|
2,521
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
3,432
|
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
Purchased materials
|
|
|
9,345
|
|
|
|
7,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,589
|
|
|
$
|
14,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historically, the majority of the inventories were determined using the LIFO method of
accounting. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we determined the FIFO method to be a preferable
method which better reflects the current cost of inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Therefore, in the fourth quarter of 2009, the accounting policy was changed to record all
inventories using the FIFO method of accounting. For
comparative purposes, all periods presented have been retrospectively adjusted on a FIFO basis
in accordance with SFAS No. 154, resulting in an approximate $2.2 million increase in retained
earnings as of July 3, 2006. The following table summarizes the effect of the accounting change on
our consolidated financial statements for 2008 and 2007 (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
30
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
As Computed
|
|
Originally
|
|
As Computed
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
Under FIFO
|
|
Reported
|
|
Under FIFO
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
134,091
|
|
|
$
|
134,875
|
|
|
$
|
141,213
|
|
|
$
|
141,187
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
2,523
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,267
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
8,183
|
|
|
|
8,199
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
10,269
|
|
|
|
14,314
|
|
|
|
7,166
|
|
|
|
11,995
|
|
Deferred income taxes current
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
163,889
|
|
|
|
166,397
|
|
|
|
165,928
|
|
|
|
168,922
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
Change in inventories
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
(2,319
|
)
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
The following table summarizes the effect of the accounting change on our condensed
consolidated financials statements for the following quarterly periods of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2008
|
|
December 28, 2008
|
|
March 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed
|
|
|
|
Computed
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
Under
|
|
Originally
|
|
Under
|
|
Originally
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
FIFO
|
|
Reported
|
|
FIFO
|
|
Reported
|
|
FIFO
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
29,289
|
|
|
$
|
29,307
|
|
|
$
|
30,919
|
|
|
$
|
30,888
|
|
|
$
|
27,295
|
|
|
$
|
27,285
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(1,233
|
)
|
|
|
(1,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2,832
|
)
|
|
|
(2,822
|
)
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
10,625
|
|
|
|
14,652
|
|
|
|
14,793
|
|
|
|
18,851
|
|
|
|
11,513
|
|
|
|
15,581
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
19,123
|
|
|
|
17,586
|
|
|
|
19,313
|
|
|
|
17,776
|
|
|
|
18,870
|
|
|
|
17,333
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
163,430
|
|
|
|
165,920
|
|
|
|
161,703
|
|
|
|
164,224
|
|
|
|
158,872
|
|
|
|
161,403
|
|
If we had not changed our method of inventory accounting from LIFO to FIFO, cost of sales for
the year ended June 28, 2009 would have been $168,000 lower than reported in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations, the tax benefit would have been $57,000 lower. On a per share basis, basic
loss per share would have been lower by $0.03 and diluted loss per share would have been lower by
$0.03.
Customer Tooling in Progress:
We incur costs related to tooling used in component production
and assembly. Costs for development of certain tooling, which will be directly reimbursed by the
customer whose parts are produced from the tool, are accumulated on the balance sheet and are then
billed to the customer. The accumulated costs are billed upon formal acceptance by the customer of
products produced with the individual tool. Other tooling costs are not directly reimbursed by the
customer. These costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related product based on
the fact that the related tool will be used over the life of the supply arrangement.
Repair and Maintenance Supply Parts:
We maintain an inventory of repair and maintenance supply
parts in support of operations. This inventory includes critical repair parts for all production
equipment as well as general maintenance items. The inventory of critical repair parts is required
to avoid disruptions in our customers just-in-time production schedules due to a lack of spare
parts when equipment break-downs occur. All required critical repair parts are on hand when the
related production equipment is placed in service and maintained to satisfy the customer model life
production and service requirements, which may be 12 to 15 years. As repair parts are used,
additional repair parts are purchased to maintain a minimum level of spare parts inventory.
Depending on maintenance requirements during the life of the equipment, excess quantities of repair
parts arise. Excess quantities are kept on hand and are not disposed of until the equipment is no
longer in service. A repair and maintenance supply parts reserve is maintained to recognize the
normal adjustment of inventory for obsolete and slow moving supply and maintenance parts. The
adequacy of the reserve is reviewed periodically in relation to the repair parts inventory
balances. The gross balance of the repair and maintenance supply parts inventory was approximately
$1.9 million at both June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, and $1.8 million at July 1, 2007. The repair
and maintenance supply parts inventory balance is included in Other Current Assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The activity
related to the repair and maintenance supply parts reserve is as follows (thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
31
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Charged to
|
|
Amounts
|
|
End of
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
Expense
|
|
Written Off
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
Year ended June 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
Year ended July 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Plant and
equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
Expected Useful Lives
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
20 years
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
20 to 35 years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 10 years
|
|
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
2,841
|
|
|
$
|
3,349
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
17,862
|
|
|
|
12,913
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
110,799
|
|
|
|
103,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,502
|
|
|
|
119,445
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(94,566
|
)
|
|
|
(89,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,936
|
|
|
$
|
30,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to
be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net
undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the assets
over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. In 2008, a loss was recognized for a
customer program specific fixed asset in the amount of $382,000.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for
major renewals and betterments, which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and
equipment, are capitalized and depreciated. Upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain
or loss is recognized in income.
Supplier Concentrations:
Approximately 24 percent of all inventory purchases were made from
four major suppliers during 2009. Approximately 25 percent and 31 percent of all inventory
purchases were made from three major suppliers during 2008 and 2007, respectively. We have
long-term contracts or arrangements with most of our suppliers to guarantee the availability of
merchandise.
Labor Concentrations:
We had approximately 1,655 full-time employees of which approximately
210 or 12.7 percent were represented by a labor union at June 28, 2009. The employees represented
by a labor union account for all production associates at our Milwaukee facility. The current
contract with the unionized associates is effective through June 30, 2012.
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue is recognized upon the shipment of products, which is when
title passes, payment terms are final, we have no remaining obligations and the customer is
required to pay. Revenue is recognized net of estimated returns and discounts, which is
recognized as a deduction from revenue at the time of the shipment.
Research and Development Costs:
Expenditures relating to the development of new products and
processes, including significant improvements and refinements to existing products, are expensed as
incurred. Research and development expenditures were approximately $1.9 million in 2009, $1.9
million in 2008, and $2.2 million in 2007.
Other Income, Net:
Net other income included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
primarily
includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses, equity in earnings from our VAST LLC
joint ventures and Rabbi Trust gains and losses. Foreign currency transaction gains are the result
of foreign currency transactions entered into by our Mexican subsidiaries and foreign currency cash
balances. The Rabbi Trust funds our supplemental executive retirement plan. The investments held in
the trust are considered trading securities. The impact of these items for the periods presented is
as follows (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
32
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
|
July 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
918
|
|
|
$
|
(320
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296
|
)
|
Equity in earnings from joint venture
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
Rabbi Trust (loss) gain
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self Insurance and Loss Sensitive Plans:
We have self-insured medical and dental plans
covering all eligible U.S. associates. The claims handling process for the self-insured plans are
managed by a third party administrator. Stop-loss insurance coverage limits our liability on a per
individual per calendar year basis. The per individual per calendar year stop-loss limit was
$150,000 in each calendar year 2007 through 2009. Each covered individual can receive up to $2
million in total benefits during his or her lifetime. Once an individuals medical claims reach $2
million, we are no longer liable for any additional claims for that individual.
We maintain an insured workers compensation program covering all U.S. associates. The
insurance is renewed annually, with a renewal date of February 27. The policy may be a guaranteed
cost policy or a loss sensitive policy. Under a guaranteed cost policy, the ultimate cost is known
at the beginning of the policy period and is subject to change only as a result of changes in
payrolls. Under a loss sensitive policy, the ultimate cost is dependent upon losses incurred during
each policy period. The incurred loss amount for loss sensitive policies will continue to change as
claims develop and are settled in future reporting periods.
The expected ultimate cost for claims incurred under the self-insured medical and dental plans
and loss sensitive workers compensation plan as of the balance sheet date is not discounted and is
recognized as an expense. The expected ultimate cost of claims is estimated based upon the
aggregate liability for reported claims and an estimated liability for claims incurred but not
reported, which is based on analysis of historical data, current trends and information available
from the insurance carrier. The expected ultimate cost for claims incurred under the self-insured
medical and dental plans that has not been paid as of the balance sheet date is included in the
accrued payroll and benefits liabilities amount in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The schedule of
premium payments due under the workers compensation plan requires a larger percentage of the
estimated premium dollars to be paid during the beginning of the policy period. The excess of the
premium payments over the expected ultimate cost for claims incurred as of the balance sheet date
is included in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Changes in the balance sheet amounts for self-insured and loss sensitive plans are as
follows (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
Expense
|
|
Payments
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred but not reported claims
reserve for self-insured plans
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Year ended June 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred but not reported claims
reserve for self-insured plans
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
2,408
|
|
|
$
|
2,408
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Year ended July 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred but not reported claims
reserve for self-insured plans
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
2,250
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Product Warranty:
We provide a specific accrual for known product issues. Historical activity
for product issues has not been significant.
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
33
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Foreign Currency Translation:
The financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries and equity
investees are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for
assets and liabilities and the average exchange rate for each applicable period for sales, costs
and expenses. Foreign currency translation adjustments are included as a component of other
accumulated comprehensive loss. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in other
income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of the
following (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
|
July 1, 2007
|
|
Unrecognized pension and postretirement
benefit liabilities, net of tax
|
|
$
|
26,876
|
|
|
$
|
15,762
|
|
|
$
|
11,894
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,094
|
|
|
$
|
17,495
|
|
|
$
|
14,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes have not been provided for the foreign currency translation adjustments in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes.
Accounting For Stock-Based Compensation:
We maintain an omnibus stock incentive plan. This
plan provides for the granting of stock options, shares of restricted stock and stock appreciation
rights. The Board of Directors has designated 1,700,000 shares of common stock available for the
grant of awards under the plan. Remaining shares available to be granted under the plan as of June
28, 2009 were 332,003. Awards that expire or are cancelled without delivery of shares become
available for re-issuance under the plan. We issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock
option exercises.
Nonqualified and incentive stock options and shares of restricted stock have been granted to
our officers and specified employees under the stock incentive plan. Stock options granted under
the plan may not be issued with an exercise price less than the fair market value of the common
stock on the date the option is granted. Stock options become exercisable as determined at the date
of grant by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The options expire 5 to 10 years
after the grant date unless an earlier expiration date is set at the time of grant. The options
vest 1 to 4 years after the date of grant. Shares of restricted stock granted under the plan are
subject to vesting criteria determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at
the time the shares are granted. Restricted shares granted have voting and dividend rights. The
restricted stock granted vests 3 years after the date of grant.
The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated as of the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes pricing model. The resulting compensation cost for fixed awards with graded vesting
schedules is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for the entire award. The
expected term of awards granted is determined based on historical experience with similar awards,
giving consideration to the expected term and vesting schedules. The expected volatility is
determined based on our historical stock prices over the most recent period commensurate with the
expected term of the award. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon
issues with a remaining term commensurate with the expected term of the award. Expected pre-vesting
option forfeitures are based primarily on historical data. The fair value of each restricted stock
grant was based on the market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of grant. The
resulting compensation cost is amortized on a straight line basis over the vesting period. We
record stock based compensation only for those awards that are expected to vest.
As of June 28, 2009, there was $317,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
stock options granted under the plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.8 years. As of June 28, 2009, there was $379,000 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to restricted stock grants under the plan. This cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 10 months. Total unrecognized compensation cost will
be adjusted for any future changes in estimated and actual forfeitures.
No stock options were exercised during fiscal 2009.
The intrinsic value of stock options exercised and the fair value of stock options vested are
as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
July 1, 2007
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
Fair value of stock options vesting
|
|
$
|
469
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
Nonqualified stock options were granted to certain of our key employees during 2009. No
options were granted during 2008 or 2007. The grant date fair values and assumptions used to
determine compensation expense in 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
34
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Options Granted During
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Options issued at grant date market value
|
|
|
$3.80
|
|
Options issued above grant date market value
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rates
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
32.96
|
%
|
Dividends
|
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
The range of options outstanding as of June 28, 2009, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise
|
|
Contractual Life Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Outstanding/Exercisable
|
|
Price Outstanding/Exercisable
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
$10.92-$18.00
|
|
|
96,800/-
|
|
|
|
$11.80/-
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
$31.95-$44.99
|
|
|
5,100/5,100
|
|
|
|
$39.27/$39.27
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
$53.07-$56.08
|
|
|
54,500/54,500
|
|
|
|
$53.90/$53.90
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Over $61.21
|
|
|
70,840/70,840
|
|
|
|
$61.72/$61.72
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$38.08/$57.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 in that all business
combinations are required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of
accounting, but SFAS No. 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number
of aspects. SFAS No. 141(R) requires that (1) for all business combinations, the acquirer record
all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at their fair
values; (2) certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired be recognized at their fair value on
the acquisition date; (3) contingent consideration be recognized at its fair value on the
acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be recognized in
earnings when settled; (4) acquisition related transaction and restructuring costs be expensed
rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition and included in the amount recorded for
assets acquired; (5) in step acquisitions, previous equity interests in an acquiree held prior to
obtaining control be remeasured to their acquisition date fair values, with any gain or loss
recognized in earnings; and (6) when making adjustments to finalize initial accounting, companies
revise any previously issued post-acquisition financial information in future financial statements
to reflect any adjustments as if they had been recorded on the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141(R) is
effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on
or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the
exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 such that the adjustments made to valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that
closed prior to the effective date of this statement should also apply the provisions of SFAS No.
141(R). This standard will be applied to all future business combinations in accordance with the
effective dates as early adoption is prohibited.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment to ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require the ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent
be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheets within equity, but separate
from the parents equity, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the
noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the Consolidated
Statements of Operations, and changes in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and will be effective for us beginning
in fiscal 2010. We do not expect the new standard to have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 132R-1, Employers
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets, which significantly expands the disclosures
required by employers for postretirement plan assts. The FSP requires plan sponsors to provide
extensive new disclosures about assets in defined benefit postretirement benefit plans as well as
any concentrations of associated risks. In addition, the FSP requires new disclosures similar to
those in FASB Statement 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, in terms of the three-level fair value
hierarchy, including a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of plan assets that
fall within Level 3 of the hierarchy. FSP FAS 132R-1 is effective for periods ending after
December 15, 2009. The disclosure requirements are annual and do not apply to interim financial
statements.
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
35
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement 165,
Subsequent Events
, to incorporate the accounting
and disclosure requirements for subsequent events into U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Statement 165 introduces new terminology, defines a date through which management must
evaluate subsequent events, and lists the circumstances under which an entity must recognize and
disclose events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date. We adopted Statement 165 as
of June 28, 2009. We evaluated our June 28, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events through
August 4, 2009, the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We are not aware of
any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
In June 2009, FASB issued, Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-1, Topic 105 Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles amendments based on the Statement of Financial Standards No. 168
the FASB Accounting Standard Codifications and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 168, the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 62. The Accounting Standards Update and SFAS No. 168 make the FASB Codification the
authoritative source of GAAP. The FASB Codification is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after September 15, 2009. We will update GAAP referencing for our September 27, 2009
Form 10-Q.
The FASB Codification is not expected to have a material impact on our financial
reporting.
INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
We participate in certain Alliance Agreements with WITTE Automotive (WITTE) and ADAC
Automotive (ADAC). WITTE, of Velbert, Germany, is a privately held automotive supplier. WITTE
designs, manufactures and markets components including locks and keys, hood latches, rear
compartment latches, seat back latches, door handles and specialty fasteners. WITTEs primary
market for these products has been Europe. ADAC, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, is a privately held
automotive supplier and manufactures engineered products, including door handles and other
automotive trim parts, utilizing plastic injection molding, automated painting and various assembly
processes.
The Alliance provides a set of cross-licensing agreements for the manufacture, distribution
and sale of WITTE products by STRATTEC and ADAC in North America, and the manufacture, distribution
and sale of STRATTEC and ADAC products by WITTE in Europe. Additionally, a joint venture company,
Vehicle Access Systems Technology LLC (VAST LLC), in which WITTE, STRATTEC and ADAC each hold a
one-third interest, exists to seek opportunities to manufacture and sell the companies products in
areas of the world outside of North America and Europe.
VAST LLC participates in joint ventures in Brazil and China. VAST do Brasil, a joint venture
between VAST LLC and Ifer do Brasil Ltda., was formed to service customers in South America. VAST
Fuzhou and VAST Great Shanghai, joint ventures between VAST LLC, Fortitude Corporation and a unit
of Elitech Technology Co. Ltd. of Taiwan, are the base of operations to service our automotive
customers in the Asian market. VAST LLC also maintains branch offices in South Korea and Japan in
support of customer sales and engineering requirements.
The VAST LLC investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The
activities related to the VAST joint ventures resulted in equity in earnings of joint ventures of
approximately $245,000 in 2009 and $561,000 in 2008. During 2009, the VAST partners made capital
contributions to VAST totaling approximately $1.7 million in support of general operating expenses.
STRATTECs portion of the capital contributions totaled $551,000. No capital contributions were
made to VAST by STRATTEC during 2008.
In fiscal year 2007, we entered into a joint venture with ADAC, in which STRATTEC holds a 50.1
percent interest and ADAC holds a 49.9 percent interest. The joint venture was created to establish
injection molding and door handle assembly operations in Mexico. ADAC-STRATTEC LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, was formed on October 27, 2006. An additional Mexican entity,
ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico, which is wholly owned by ADAC-STRATTEC LLC, was formed on February 21,
2007. ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico production activities began in July 2007. ADAC-STRATTEC LLCs
financial results are consolidated with the financial results of STRATTEC and resulted in no change
in net income to STRATTEC in 2009 and increased net income to STRATTEC of $26,000 in 2008.
Effective November 30, 2008, STRATTEC and WITTE established a new entity, STRATTEC POWER
ACCESS LLC (SPA), which is 80 percent owned by STRATTEC and 20 percent owned by WITTE. SPA
operates the North American portion of the Power Products business which was acquired from Delphi
Corporation. For the seven months ended June 28, 2009, the operating results of SPA resulted in an
increased net loss to STRATTEC of approximately $2.1 million.
LINE OF CREDIT
We have a $50 million short-term, unsecured line of credit (Line of Credit) with M&I
Marshall & Ilsley Bank which expires October 31, 2009. Interest on borrowings under the Line of
Credit is at varying rates
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
36
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
based on the London Interbank Offering Rate or the banks prime rate. There were no outstanding
borrowings at June 28, 2009 or June 29, 2008. There were no borrowings under any third party debt
facilities during 2009, 2008 or 2007. The Line of Credit is not subject to any covenants. We are
also in the process of negotiating a new Line of Credit and anticipate this facility to be renewed
but at a reduced available borrowing amount. We believe the Line of Credit is adequate, along with
cash flow from operations, to meet our anticipated capital expenditure, working capital and
operating expenditure requirements as we manage our business through these unusually low automotive
vehicle production levels.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In 1995, we recorded a provision of $3.0 million for estimated costs to remediate a site at
our Milwaukee facility. The site was contaminated by a solvent spill, which occurred in 1985, from
a former above-ground solvent storage tank located on the east side of the facility. The reserve
was established based on third party estimates to adequately cover the cost for active remediation
of the contamination. We continue to monitor and evaluate the site with the use of groundwater
monitoring wells that are installed on the property. An environmental consultant samples these
wells one to two times a year to determine the status of the contamination and the potential for
remediation of the contamination by natural attenuation, the dissipation of the contamination over
time to concentrations below applicable standards. If such sampling evidences a sufficient degree
of and trend toward natural attenuation of the contamination, we may be able to obtain a closure
letter from the regulatory authorities resolving the issue without the need for active remediation.
If a sufficient degree and trend toward natural attenuation is not evidenced by sampling, a more
active form of remediation beyond natural attenuation may be required. The sampling has not yet
satisfied all of the requirements for closure by natural attenuation. As a result sampling
continues and the reserve remains. The reserve is not measured on a discounted basis. Management
believes, based upon findings-to-date and known environmental regulations, that the environmental
reserve at June 28, 2009, is adequate to cover any future developments.
At June 28, 2009, we had purchase commitments for zinc, aluminum, other purchased parts and
natural gas totaling approximately $7.9 million payable in 2010 and $2.1 million payable in 2011.
Minimum rental commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases with a term in excess of one
year are payable as follows: 2010-$645,000; 2011-$588,000; 2012-$562,000; 2013-$392,000;
2014-$397,000; 2015-$200,000. Rental expense under all non-cancelable operating leases totaled
approximately $516,000 in 2009, $622,000 in 2008 and $595,000 in 2007.
INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes and deferred tax asset data presented below for 2008 and 2007
have been retrospectively adjusted for our change in 2009 from the last-in, first-out method of
inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out method.
The (benefit) provision for income taxes consists of the following (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Currently (refundable) payable
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(1,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
2,624
|
|
State
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
State refund claim recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
Deferred tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the Federal statutory
tax rate and the provision for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
U.S. statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
State refund claim recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Foreign sales benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Foreign Subsidiaries
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
.8
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
(.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
37
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The 2008 and 2007 income tax provisions include favorable tax benefits related to the
operation of our Mexican subsidiaries as Maquiladora entities. The 2007 income tax provision
includes a state refund claim recovery. The 2007 claim recovery, net of the Federal income tax
impact, was approximately $329,000.
The components of deferred tax assets and (liabilities) are as follows (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
Deferred income taxescurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair and maintenance supply parts reserve
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
Payroll-related accruals
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Environmental reserve
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
Accrued customer pricing
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
Method change for inventory valuation
|
|
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,124
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxesnoncurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension obligations
|
|
$
|
(7,384
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,513
|
)
|
Unrecognized pension and postretirement
benefit plan liabilities
|
|
|
16,472
|
|
|
|
9,661
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,807
|
)
|
|
|
(2,319
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Postretirement obligations
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
NOL/credit carry-forwards
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,143
|
|
|
$
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis and are stated at enacted tax rates expected
to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.
Federal operating loss carry-forwards for tax purposes were $6.9 million at June 28, 2009 and
result in tax benefits of approximately $2.3 million. These loss carry-forwards expire in 2029.
Federal tax credits available to offset future tax liabilities were $625,000 at June 28, 2009 and
expire in years 2017 through 2022. State operating loss and credit carry-forwards at June 28, 2009
result in future benefits of approximately $310,000 and begin to expire in 2024. We evaluated the
need to maintain a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Based on this evaluation,
which included a review of recent profitability and future projections of profitability, we
concluded a valuation allowance is not necessary at June 28, 2009.
Foreign income before the provision for income taxes was $2.9 million in 2009, $1.6 million in
2008 and $1.5 million in 2007. No provision for Federal income taxes was made on earnings of
foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures that are considered permanently invested or that would be
offset by foreign tax credits upon distribution. Such undistributed earnings at June 28, 2009 were
$12.0 million.
We adopted the provisions for FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, on July 2, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a
decrease of $346,000 in accrued income taxes and a corresponding adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total liability for
unrecognized tax benefits was $1.2 million as of June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008. This liability
includes approximately $118,000 of accrued interest at June 28, 2009, and $113,000 of accrued
interest at June 29, 2008. The liability does not include an amount for accrued penalties. The
amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was
approximately $949,000 at June 28, 2009 and $886,000 at June 29, 2008. We recognize interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits June 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
Gross increases tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
362
|
|
Gross decreases tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Gross increases current period tax positions
|
|
|
310
|
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits June 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
38
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We or one of our subsidiaries files income tax returns in the United States (Federal),
Wisconsin (state), Michigan (state) and various other states, Mexico and other foreign
jurisdictions. We are currently subject to income tax examinations in Wisconsin for fiscal years
2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and in Texas for fiscal years 2005 and 2006. Tax years open to
examination by tax authorities under the statute of limitations include fiscal 2006 through 2009
for Federal, fiscal 2005 through 2009 for most states and calendar 2004 through 2008 for foreign
jurisdictions.
RETIREMENT PLANS AND POSTRETIREMENT COSTS
We have a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all U.S.
associates. Benefits are based on years of service and final average compensation. Our policy is to
fund at least the minimum actuarially computed annual contribution required under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Plan assets consist primarily of listed equity and
fixed income securities.
We have a noncontributory supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP), which is a
nonqualified defined benefit plan. The SERP will pay supplemental pension benefits to certain key
employees upon retirement based upon the employees years of service and compensation. The SERP is
being funded through a Rabbi Trust with M&I Trust Company. The trust assets had a value of $3.5
million at June 28, 2009 and $3.9 million at June 29, 2008. These assets are included in Other
Current Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The projected benefit obligation was $3.0
million at June 28, 2009 and $2.7 million at June 29, 2008. The SERP liabilities are included in
the pension tables below. However, the trust assets are excluded from the table as they do not
qualify as plan assets.
We also sponsor a postretirement health care plan for all U.S. associates hired prior to June
2, 2001. The expected cost of retiree health care benefits is recognized during the years that the
associates who are covered under the plan render service. In June 2005, amendments were made to the
postretirement plan including a change in the number of years of allowed benefit and a change in
the medical plan providing the benefit coverage. The maximum number of years of benefit was reduced
from 10 to 5 for unionized associates retiring after June 27, 2005 and for non-unionized associates
retiring after October 1, 2005. Effective with these dates in 2005, eligibility for the benefit
requires 30 years of service and the benefit ends at age 65. The postretirement health care plan is
unfunded.
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, at June 28, 2009, which
have not yet been recognized in net periodic benefit cost are as follows (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and SERP Benefits
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
(2,216
|
)
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
22,423
|
|
|
|
6,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,823
|
|
|
$
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 28, 2009 are prior
service costs of $79,000 ($49,000 net of tax) and unrecognized net actuarial losses of
$803,000 ($498,000 net of tax) expected to be recognized in pension and SERP net
periodic benefit cost during 2010.
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 28, 2009 are prior
service credits of $388,000 ($241,000 net of tax) and unrecognized net actuarial losses
of $685,000 ($425,000 net of tax) expected to be recognized in postretirement net
periodic benefit cost during 2010.
The following tables summarize the pension, SERP and postretirement plans
income and expense, funded status and actuarial assumptions for the years
indicated (thousands of dollars). We use a June 30 measurement date for our
pension and postretirement plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
39
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and SERP Benefits
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT
COST:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,935
|
|
|
$
|
2,018
|
|
|
$
|
1,974
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
|
|
4,348
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6,562
|
)
|
|
|
(6,210
|
)
|
|
|
(5,348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
$
|
1,511
|
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and SERP Benefits
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 29,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
ASSUMPTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
Expected return on
plan assets
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Rate of compensation
increases
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
6.41
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
6.41
|
%
|
Expected return on
plan assets
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Rate of compensation
increases
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CHANGE IN PROJECTED
BENEFIT OBLIGATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
72,939
|
|
|
$
|
74,494
|
|
|
$
|
10,871
|
|
|
$
|
11,748
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
(5,399
|
)
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3,466
|
)
|
|
|
(3,021
|
)
|
|
|
(1,489
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at
end of year
|
|
$
|
78,058
|
|
|
$
|
72,939
|
|
|
$
|
10,812
|
|
|
$
|
10,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan
assets at beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
70,996
|
|
|
$
|
75,881
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan
assets
|
|
|
(9,936
|
)
|
|
|
(6,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3,466
|
)
|
|
|
(3,021
|
)
|
|
|
(1,489
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan
assets at end of year
|
|
|
60,594
|
|
|
|
70,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status prepaid
(accrued) benefit
obligations
|
|
$
|
(17,464
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and
benefits (current
liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,088
|
)
|
Accrued benefit
obligations (long-term
liabilities)
|
|
|
(15,183
|
)
|
|
|
(2,606
|
)
|
|
|
(9,601
|
)
|
|
|
(9,783
|
)
|
Prepaid pension
obligations (long-term
assets)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(17,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
40
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and SERP Benefits
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 29,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CHANGES IN PLAN ASSETS AND
BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS RECOGNIZED
IN OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
18,065
|
|
|
|
7,675
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service (cost) credits
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(695
|
)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive
income, before tax
|
|
|
17,731
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit
cost and other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
18,521
|
|
|
$
|
8,330
|
|
|
$
|
1,430
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pension benefits have a separately determined accumulated benefit obligation,
which is the actuarial present value of benefits based on service rendered and current
and past compensation levels. This differs from the projected benefit obligation in that
it includes no assumptions about future compensation levels. The following table
summarizes the accumulated benefit obligations and projected benefit obligations for the
pension and SERP (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
71,167
|
|
|
$
|
65,626
|
|
|
$
|
2,826
|
|
|
$
|
2,434
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
75,079
|
|
|
$
|
70,238
|
|
|
$
|
2,979
|
|
|
$
|
2,701
|
|
For measurement purposes, an 8.5 percent annual rate increase in the per capita cost of
covered health care benefits was assumed for 2010; the rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5
percent by the year 2017 and remain at that level thereafter.
The health care cost trend assumption has a significant effect on the postretirement benefit
amounts reported. A 1% change in the health care cost trend rates would have the following effects
(thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Increase
|
|
1% Decrease
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components in
fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of June 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
653
|
|
|
$
|
(589
|
)
|
We employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income
investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk.
Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of short and long-term plan
liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio
contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed income investments. Furthermore, equity
investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, as well as growth and value style
managers, and small, mid and large market capitalizations. The investment portfolio does not
include any real estate holdings. The investment policy of the plan prohibits investment in
STRATTEC stock. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through periodic
investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements and periodic asset/liability studies.
The pension plan weighted-average asset allocations by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Allocation
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
Fixed-income investments
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets used to
calculate the 2009 net periodic benefit cost was 8.25%. The target asset allocation is
65% public equity and 35% fixed income. The 8.25% is approximated by applying returns of
10% on public equity and 6% on fixed income to the target allocation. The actual
historical returns are also relevant. Annualized returns for periods ended June 28, 2009
were 2.57% for 10 years, 6.97% for 15 years, 7.60% for 20 years, 9.71% for 25 years and
10.28% for 30 years. Effective June 30, 2009, the expected long-term rate of return was
reduced to 8.0%.
We expect to contribute approximately $4 million to our qualified pension plan,
$2.3 million to our SERP and $1.2 million to our postretirement health care plan in
2010. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as
appropriate, are expected to be paid (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and SERP Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
2010
|
|
$
|
6,386
|
|
|
$
|
1,211
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,397
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,694
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5,126
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
2014
|
|
|
5,308
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
2015-2019
|
|
|
30,131
|
|
|
|
4,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
41
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
All U.S. associates may participate in a 401(k) Plan. We contribute a fixed percentage up
to the first 6 percent of eligible compensation that a participant contributes to the plan. The
fixed percentage contribution for all U.S. salaried associates was reduced from 50% to 20%
effective January 1, 2009. Our contributions totaled approximately $464,000 in 2009, $613,000 in
2008 and $603,000 in 2007.
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
We have 12,000,000 shares of authorized common stock, par value $.01 per share, with
3,261,968 and 3,443,209 shares issued and outstanding at June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008,
respectively. Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters
voted on by shareholders.
Our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to buy back up to 3,839,395
outstanding shares as of June 28, 2009. As of June 28, 2009, 3,655,322 shares have been
repurchased under this program at a cost of approximately $136.4 million.
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE (LPS) (EPS)
Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed on
the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the dilutive potential
common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential
common shares include outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards. The reconciliation
of the components of the basic and diluted per share computations that follows includes amounts
for 2008 and 2007 that have been retrospectively adjusted for our change in 2009 from the
last-in, first-out method of inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out method (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Basic (LPS) EPS
|
|
$
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
|
$
|
(1.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
8,199
|
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (LPS) EPS
|
|
$
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
$
|
(1.86
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
3,494
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
8,199
|
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 28, 2009, options to purchase 227,240 shares of common stock at a
weighted-average exercise price of $38.07 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. As of June 29, 2008, options to
purchase 184,680 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $59.13 were
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have
been anti-dilutive. As of July 1, 2007, options to purchase 230,320 shares of common stock at a
weighted-average exercise price of $59.14 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
STOCK OPTION AND PURCHASE PLANS
A summary of stock option activity under the plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Balance at July 2, 2006
|
|
|
283,530
|
|
|
$
|
56.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(7,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(35,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
49.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
56.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2007
|
|
|
235,420
|
|
|
$
|
58.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(47,640
|
)
|
|
$
|
58.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 29, 2008
|
|
|
187,780
|
|
|
$
|
58.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
96,800
|
|
|
$
|
11.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(52,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
61.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
58.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 28, 2009
|
|
|
227,240
|
|
|
$
|
38.07
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
130,440
|
|
|
$
|
57.57
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
|
148,440
|
|
|
$
|
58.09
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
July 1, 2007
|
|
|
181,080
|
|
|
$
|
58.05
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
Available for grant as of
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
332,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No options included above were granted at a price greater than the market value on the
date of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
42
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of restricted stock activity under the plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
Nonvested Balance at July 2, 2006
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
$
|
51.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
40.00
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Balance at July 1, 2007
|
|
|
19,400
|
|
|
$
|
45.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
47.78
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Balance at June 29, 2008
|
|
|
29,400
|
|
|
$
|
46.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
29.00
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(10,200
|
)
|
|
$
|
50.58
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
46.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Balance at June 28, 2009
|
|
|
28,200
|
|
|
$
|
38.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan to provide substantially all U.S. full-time associates
an opportunity to purchase shares of STRATTEC common stock through payroll deductions. A
participant may contribute a maximum of $5,200 per calendar year to the plan. On the last day of
each month, participant account balances are used to purchase shares of stock at the average of the
highest and lowest reported sales prices of a share of STRATTEC common stock on the NASDAQ Global
Market. A total of 100,000 shares may be issued under the plan. Shares issued from treasury stock
under the plan totaled 2,548 at an average price of $15.63 during 2009, 704 at an average price of
$41.62 during 2008 and 771 at an average price of $43.15 during 2007. A total of 80,667 shares are
available for purchase under the plan as of June 28, 2009.
EXPORT SALES
Export sales are summarized below (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Export Sales
|
|
$
|
28,050
|
|
|
$
|
25,714
|
|
|
$
|
30,643
|
|
Percent of Net
Sales
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
These sales were primarily to automotive manufacturing assembly plants in Canada, Mexico and
Korea.
SALES AND RECEIVABLE CONCENTRATION
Sales to our largest customers were as follows (thousands of dollars and percent of total net
sales):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
%
|
|
General Motors Corporation
|
|
$
|
39,156
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
$
|
45,039
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,687
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Ford Motor Company
|
|
|
12,575
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
19,419
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
21,013
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Chrysler LLC
|
|
|
31,864
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
40,209
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Delphi Corporation
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
14,872
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
18,398
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,921
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
$
|
119,539
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
$
|
133,197
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from our largest customers were as follows (thousands of
dollars and percent of gross receivables):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Motors Corporation
|
|
$
|
7,029
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,367
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Ford Motor Company
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Chrysler LLC
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Delphi Corporation
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,171
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
43
|
REPORTS
REPORT ON MANAGEMENTS ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair
presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The
consolidated financial statements and notes included in this annual report have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
necessarily include some amounts that are based on managements best estimates and judgments.
We, as management of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, are responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting that is designed to produce
reliable financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting
principles. The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial
statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a
program of internal audits. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are
identified. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations,
including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal
control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control
will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.
The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors, consisting entirely of independent
directors, meets regularly with management and the independent registered public accounting firm,
and reviews audit plans and results, as well as managements actions taken in discharging
responsibilities for accounting, financial reporting, and internal control. Grant Thornton LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, has direct and confidential access to the Audit
Committee at all times to discuss the results of their examinations.
Management assessed the Corporations system of internal control over financial reporting as
of June 28, 2009, in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting
as described in Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management concludes
that, as of June 28, 2009, its system of internal control over financial reporting is effective and
meets the criteria of the Internal Control Integrated Framework. Grant Thornton LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
Corporations internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
Patrick J. Hansen
|
Chairman, President and
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
44
|
REPORTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION:
We have audited STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATIONS (a Wisconsin Corporation) and subsidiaries,
collectively the Company, internal control over financial reporting as of June 28, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report on
Managements Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of June 28, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
and subsidiaries as of June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008 and the related Consolidated Statements of
Operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the three years ended June 28, 2009 and our
report dated August 24, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Grant Thornton LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
45
|
REPORTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
(a Wisconsin Corporation) and subsidiaries, collectively the Company, as of June 28, 2009 and
June 29, 2008, and the related statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended June 28, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION as of June 28, 2009
and June 29, 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended June 28, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATIONS internal control over financial
reporting as of June 28 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and
our report dated August 24, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting.
As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as of June 28, 2009, the
Company changed its method of accounting for inventory from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to
the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, and applied this change retrospectively in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections.
Grant Thornton LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
46
|
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The financial data for each period presented below reflects the consolidated
results of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Fiscal
years 2005 through 2008 have been retrospectively adjusted for our change in 2009 from
the last-in, first-out method of inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out
method. Additional details are available in Notes to Financial Statements. The
information below should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis, and the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
The following data are in thousands of dollars except per share amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
126,097
|
|
|
$
|
159,642
|
|
|
$
|
167,707
|
|
|
$
|
181,197
|
|
|
$
|
190,314
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
13,240
|
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
|
|
26,520
|
|
|
|
38,354
|
|
|
|
42,912
|
|
Engineering, selling, and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
25,480
|
|
|
|
23,962
|
|
|
|
20,189
|
|
|
|
22,067
|
|
|
|
20,688
|
|
Provision for doubtful
accounts, net
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
(Loss) Income from operations
|
|
|
(12,740
|
)
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
6,331
|
|
|
|
14,665
|
|
|
|
22,144
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income before taxes
|
|
|
(10,323
|
)
|
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
|
10,732
|
|
|
|
18,188
|
|
|
|
23,633
|
|
(Benefit) Provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
4,900
|
|
|
|
8,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,781
|
|
|
$
|
8,199
|
|
|
$
|
13,288
|
|
|
$
|
15,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
3.58
|
|
|
$
|
3.99
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(1.86
|
)
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
per share:
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net working capital
|
|
$
|
41,710
|
|
|
$
|
72,835
|
|
|
$
|
84,077
|
|
|
$
|
83,242
|
|
|
$
|
76,786
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
128,189
|
|
|
|
144,221
|
|
|
|
151,440
|
|
|
|
157,270
|
|
|
|
140,257
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
24,784
|
|
|
|
12,389
|
|
|
|
13,431
|
|
|
|
10,510
|
|
|
|
16,271
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
71,418
|
|
|
|
97,940
|
|
|
|
105,954
|
|
|
|
113,253
|
|
|
|
93,918
|
|
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly data presented below has been retrospectively adjusted for our change in 2009 from
the last-in, first-out method of inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out method. The
following data are in thousands of dollars except per share amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
Market Price Per Share
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
2009
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
34,731
|
|
|
$
|
5,424
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
38.45
|
|
|
$
|
25.63
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
33,799
|
|
|
|
2,911
|
|
|
|
(1,202
|
)
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
28.90
|
|
|
|
12.06
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
29,348
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
|
|
(2,822
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
18.89
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
28,219
|
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
|
|
(2,118
|
)
|
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
7.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
126,097
|
|
|
$
|
13,240
|
|
|
$
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.86
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
42,739
|
|
|
$
|
7,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,990
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
51.04
|
|
|
$
|
45.03
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
39,908
|
|
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
49.18
|
|
|
|
42.00
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
38,428
|
|
|
|
6,229
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
44.87
|
|
|
|
35.06
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
38,567
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
43.95
|
|
|
|
34.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
159,642
|
|
|
$
|
24,767
|
|
|
$
|
2,781
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered shareholders of record at June 28, 2009, were 2,268.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
47
|
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The chart below shows a comparison of the cumulative return since June 24, 2004
had $100 been invested at the close of business on June 24, 2004 in STRATTEC Common
Stock, the NASDAQ Composite Index (all issuers), and the Dow Jones U.S. Auto Parts
Index.
COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, The NASDAQ Composite Index
And The Dow Jones U.S. Auto Parts Index
COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, The NASDAQ
Composite Index And The Dow Jones U.S. Auto Parts Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/25/04
|
|
|
7/1/05
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
|
|
7/1/07
|
|
|
6/29/08
|
|
|
6/28/09
|
|
|
STRATTEC**
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Composite Index
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
Dow Jones U.S. Auto
Parts Index
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
$100 invested on June 25, 2004 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends. Indexes
calculated on a month-end basis.
|
|
**
|
|
The fiscal year end closing price of STRATTEC Common Stock on June 25, 2004 was $67.57, the
closing price on July 1, 2005 was $53.82, the closing price on June 30, 2006 was $49.81, the
closing price on June 29, 2007, was $46.97, the closing price on June 27, 2008 was $34.99, and the
closing price on June 26, 2009 was $13.90.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 STRATTEC Annual Report
|
|
48
|
DIRECTORS/OFFICERS/SHAREHOLDERS INFORMATIOSTRATTEC Board of Directors (Left to Right) Frank J. Krejci, Michael J. Koss
Robert Feitler, Harold M. Stratton II, David R. Zimmer 3 STRATTEC BOARD OF
DIRECTORS Harold M. Stratton II, 61 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Robert Feitler, 78
Former President and Chief Operating Officer of Weyco Group, Inc. Chairman of the Executive Committee and
Director of Weyco Group, Inc. Michael J. Koss, 55 President and Chief Executive Officer of Koss
Corporation Director of Koss Corporation Frank J. Krejci, 59
President and Chief Executive Officer of The Custom Shoppe David R. Zimmer, 63 Managing Partner of .
Stonebridge Business Partners CORPORATE OFFICER Harold M. Stratton II, 61 Patrick J. Hansen, 50 Senior
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Dennis A. Kazmierski, 57 Vice President-Marketing and Sales
Kathryn E. Scherbarth, 53 Vice President-Milwaukee Operations Rolando J. Guillot, 41 Vice
President-Mexican Operations Milan R. Bundalo, 58 Vice President-Materials Brian J. Reetz,
51 Vice President-Security Products Richard P. Messina, 44Vice President-Access Products
SHAREHOLDERS INFORMATIONAnnual Meeting The Annual Meeting of Shareholders willconvene at 8:00 a.m.
(CST) on October 6, 2009, at thRadisson Hotel,7065 North Port Washington Road,Milwaukee, WI 5321Common Stock
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol:
STRTForm 10-K You may receive a copy of the STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION Form 10-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, by writing to the Secretary at STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, 3333 W. Good
Hope Road, Milwaukee, WI 53209Corporate GovernanceTo review the Companys corporate governance, board committee
charters and code of business ethics,please visit the Corporate Governance section of our Web site at www.strattec.com .
Shareholder InquiriesCommunications concerning the transfer of shares, lost certificates or changes of address should be
directed to the Transfer Agent.Transfer Agent and Registrar Wells Fargo Bank, N.AShareholder ServiceP.O. Box 64854 St.
Paul, MN 55164-08541.800.468.9716
|
49
3 STRATTEC The Trusted Leader in Automotive Access Control Products
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION 3333 WEST GOOD HOPE ROAD MILWAUKEE,
WI 53209 PHONE 414.247.3333 FAX 414.247.3329 www. st ra ttec.com
|