UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended:
September 30, 2009
OR
|
(
) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number:
001-15185
CIK number:
0000036966
First Horizon National Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
|
|
|
TN
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
|
|
62-0803242
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
165 MADISON AVENUE
|
|
|
MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
|
|
38103
|
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code -
(901) 523-4444
(Former name or former address, if changed from last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
X
No___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes___No___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
x
|
|
Accelerated filer ___
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ___
|
|
Smaller reporting company ___
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act)
Yes___No
x
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding on September 30, 2009
|
Common Stock, $.625 par value
|
|
|
218,653,769
|
|
FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
INDEX
2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Consolidated Condensed Statements of Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
|
This financial information reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the
interim periods presented.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
|
|
First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
(Dollars in thousands)(Unaudited)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
$328,150
|
|
|
|
$815,935
|
|
|
|
$552,423
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
622,733
|
|
|
|
921,295
|
|
|
|
772,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
950,883
|
|
|
|
1,737,230
|
|
|
|
1,324,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing cash
|
|
|
166,352
|
|
|
|
37,546
|
|
|
|
207,792
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
701,151
|
|
|
|
1,561,024
|
|
|
|
945,766
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
502,687
|
|
|
|
718,029
|
|
|
|
566,654
|
|
Securities available for sale (Note 3)
|
|
|
2,645,922
|
|
|
|
2,840,739
|
|
|
|
3,125,153
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income (Note 4)
|
|
|
18,524,685
|
|
|
|
21,601,898
|
|
|
|
21,278,190
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
944,765
|
|
|
|
760,456
|
|
|
|
849,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans
|
|
|
17,579,920
|
|
|
|
20,841,442
|
|
|
|
20,428,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights (Note 5)
|
|
|
289,282
|
|
|
|
798,491
|
|
|
|
376,844
|
|
Goodwill (Note 6)
|
|
|
178,381
|
|
|
|
192,408
|
|
|
|
192,408
|
|
Other intangible assets, net (Note 6)
|
|
|
40,498
|
|
|
|
46,887
|
|
|
|
45,082
|
|
Capital markets receivables
|
|
|
797,949
|
|
|
|
1,651,547
|
|
|
|
1,178,932
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
321,788
|
|
|
|
336,078
|
|
|
|
333,931
|
|
Real estate acquired by foreclosure
|
|
|
111,389
|
|
|
|
151,461
|
|
|
|
125,538
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,179,650
|
|
|
|
1,891,494
|
|
|
|
2,170,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$26,465,852
|
|
|
|
$32,804,376
|
|
|
|
$31,021,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
$4,416,121
|
|
|
|
$4,350,832
|
|
|
|
$4,824,939
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
2,156,768
|
|
|
|
2,510,344
|
|
|
|
2,294,644
|
|
Other interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,162,059
|
|
|
|
1,638,731
|
|
|
|
1,783,362
|
|
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more
|
|
|
1,263,331
|
|
|
|
1,470,089
|
|
|
|
1,382,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
9,998,279
|
|
|
|
9,969,996
|
|
|
|
10,285,181
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
4,236,704
|
|
|
|
3,808,239
|
|
|
|
3,956,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
14,234,983
|
|
|
|
13,778,235
|
|
|
|
14,241,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,267,644
|
|
|
|
1,890,681
|
|
|
|
1,751,079
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
|
415,293
|
|
|
|
380,896
|
|
|
|
359,502
|
|
Other short-term borrowings and commercial paper
|
|
|
1,739,202
|
|
|
|
6,149,073
|
|
|
|
4,279,689
|
|
Term borrowings
|
|
|
2,368,381
|
|
|
|
4,545,791
|
|
|
|
4,022,297
|
|
Other collateralized borrowings
|
|
|
711,087
|
|
|
|
749,797
|
|
|
|
745,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
3,079,468
|
|
|
|
5,295,588
|
|
|
|
4,767,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets payables
|
|
|
542,829
|
|
|
|
1,645,118
|
|
|
|
1,115,428
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
816,224
|
|
|
|
791,867
|
|
|
|
932,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
23,095,643
|
|
|
|
29,931,458
|
|
|
|
27,447,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Horizon National Corporation Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - no par value (shares authorized - 5,000,000; shares issued - series CPP 866,540
on September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008) (Note 12)
|
|
794,630
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
782,680
|
|
Common stock - $.625 par value (shares authorized - 400,000,000; shares
issued -
218,653,769 on September 30, 2009; 217,503,590 on September 30, 2008;
and
217,488,665 on December 31, 2008) *
|
|
|
136,659
|
|
|
|
125,996
|
|
|
|
128,302
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
1,170,916
|
|
|
|
1,016,498
|
|
|
|
1,048,602
|
|
Capital surplus common stock warrant - CPP (Note 12)
|
|
|
83,860
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
83,860
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
|
|
|
(116,265
|
)
|
|
|
(48,037
|
)
|
|
|
(151,831
|
)
|
Undivided profits
|
|
|
1,005,244
|
|
|
|
1,483,184
|
|
|
|
1,387,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total First Horizon National Corporation Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
3,075,044
|
|
|
|
2,577,641
|
|
|
|
3,279,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 12)
|
|
|
295,165
|
|
|
|
295,277
|
|
|
|
295,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
3,370,209
|
|
|
|
2,872,918
|
|
|
|
3,574,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
$26,465,852
|
|
|
|
$32,804,376
|
|
|
|
$31,021,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
* Outstanding shares have been restated to reflect stock dividends distributed through October 1,
2009.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)(Unaudited)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
184,910
|
|
|
$
|
281,648
|
|
|
$
|
588,338
|
|
|
$
|
898,743
|
|
Interest on investment securities
|
|
|
33,495
|
|
|
|
38,733
|
|
|
|
110,057
|
|
|
|
118,681
|
|
Interest on loans held for sale
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
29,078
|
|
|
|
20,129
|
|
|
|
141,732
|
|
Interest on trading securities
|
|
|
11,780
|
|
|
|
27,586
|
|
|
|
41,502
|
|
|
|
93,665
|
|
Interest on other earning assets
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
6,198
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
22,350
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
236,360
|
|
|
|
383,243
|
|
|
|
761,948
|
|
|
|
1,275,171
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
7,553
|
|
|
|
17,005
|
|
|
|
31,821
|
|
|
|
60,957
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
13,980
|
|
|
|
22,443
|
|
|
|
48,493
|
|
|
|
79,216
|
|
Other interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
|
|
11,573
|
|
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
|
|
15,184
|
|
|
|
23,236
|
|
|
|
63,552
|
|
Interest on trading liabilities
|
|
|
4,691
|
|
|
|
8,304
|
|
|
|
15,424
|
|
|
|
27,319
|
|
Interest on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
47,192
|
|
|
|
10,447
|
|
|
|
166,666
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
9,461
|
|
|
|
47,119
|
|
|
|
42,673
|
|
|
|
175,754
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
45,459
|
|
|
|
160,096
|
|
|
|
175,374
|
|
|
|
585,037
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
190,901
|
|
|
|
223,147
|
|
|
|
586,574
|
|
|
|
690,134
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
745,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
Net interest income/(expense) after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,901
|
|
|
|
(116,853
|
)
|
|
|
(158,426
|
)
|
|
|
(109,866
|
)
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets
|
|
|
129,043
|
|
|
|
86,854
|
|
|
|
514,127
|
|
|
|
320,505
|
|
Mortgage banking
|
|
|
59,211
|
|
|
|
106,817
|
|
|
|
190,443
|
|
|
|
437,947
|
|
Deposit transactions and cash management
|
|
|
41,738
|
|
|
|
45,802
|
|
|
|
122,585
|
|
|
|
135,152
|
|
Trust services and investment management
|
|
|
7,347
|
|
|
|
8,154
|
|
|
|
21,818
|
|
|
|
26,146
|
|
Insurance commissions
|
|
|
5,907
|
|
|
|
7,332
|
|
|
|
19,380
|
|
|
|
22,298
|
|
Gains/(losses) from loan sales and securitizations
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
|
|
(7,843
|
)
|
Equity securities gains/(losses), net
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
63,833
|
|
Debt securities gains, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
Losses on divestitures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,489
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18,913
|
)
|
All other income and commissions
|
|
|
58,352
|
|
|
|
55,575
|
|
|
|
115,585
|
|
|
|
143,996
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
303,818
|
|
|
|
296,073
|
|
|
|
987,347
|
|
|
|
1,124,052
|
|
|
Adjusted gross income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
309,719
|
|
|
|
179,220
|
|
|
|
828,921
|
|
|
|
1,014,186
|
|
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits
|
|
|
178,734
|
|
|
|
207,423
|
|
|
|
614,301
|
|
|
|
755,433
|
|
Legal and professional fees
|
|
|
17,077
|
|
|
|
16,556
|
|
|
|
45,688
|
|
|
|
44,710
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
16,207
|
|
|
|
26,854
|
|
|
|
47,465
|
|
|
|
84,786
|
|
Operations services
|
|
|
15,392
|
|
|
|
18,881
|
|
|
|
47,439
|
|
|
|
54,454
|
|
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
12,268
|
|
|
|
25,561
|
|
|
|
45,371
|
|
Communications and courier
|
|
|
6,837
|
|
|
|
9,243
|
|
|
|
20,688
|
|
|
|
30,780
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
|
|
6,424
|
|
All other expense
|
|
|
105,514
|
|
|
|
94,488
|
|
|
|
354,458
|
|
|
|
237,815
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
349,901
|
|
|
|
387,515
|
|
|
|
1,160,190
|
|
|
|
1,259,773
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(40,182
|
)
|
|
|
(208,295
|
)
|
|
|
(331,269
|
)
|
|
|
(245,587
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(15,368
|
)
|
|
|
(87,824
|
)
|
|
|
(136,834
|
)
|
|
|
(123,088
|
)
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(24,814
|
)
|
|
|
(120,471
|
)
|
|
|
(194,435
|
)
|
|
|
(122,499
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(10,200
|
)
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
(11,156
|
)
|
|
|
(3,977
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(35,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(122,220
|
)
|
|
$
|
(205,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126,476
|
)
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
8,563
|
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
(37,983
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
(214,154
|
)
|
|
$
|
(136,256
|
)
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
14,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(52,859
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
(258,842
|
)
|
|
$
|
(136,256
|
)
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations (Note 8)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.72
|
)
|
|
Diluted loss per share from continuing operations (Note 8)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.72
|
)
|
|
Loss per share available to common shareholders (Note 8)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
Diluted loss per share available to common shareholders (Note 8)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic (Note 8)
|
|
|
217,186
|
|
|
|
217,062
|
|
|
|
217,152
|
|
|
|
182,858
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted (Note 8)
|
|
|
217,186
|
|
|
|
217,062
|
|
|
|
217,152
|
|
|
|
182,858
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
5
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)(Unaudited)
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, January 1
|
|
|
$3,279,467
|
|
|
|
$295,165
|
|
|
|
$3,574,632
|
|
|
|
$2,135,596
|
|
|
|
$295,277
|
|
|
|
$2,430,873
|
|
Adjustment to reflect adoption of measurement date
provisions under the Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures topic (ASC 820)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,502
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,502
|
)
|
Adjustment to reflect change in accounting for split
dollar life insurance arrangements (ASC 715-60)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,530
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,530
|
)
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(214,154
|
)
|
|
|
8,563
|
|
|
|
(205,591
|
)
|
|
|
(136,256
|
)
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
|
(126,476
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized fair value adjustments, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
25,216
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,216
|
|
|
|
(2,679
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,679
|
)
|
Recognized pension and other employee benefit
plans net periodic benefit costs
|
|
|
10,350
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,350
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
|
(178,588
|
)
|
|
|
8,563
|
|
|
|
(170,025
|
)
|
|
|
(136,192
|
)
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
|
(126,412
|
)
|
|
Preferred stock - (CPP) accretion
|
|
|
11,950
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,950
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Preferred stock - (CPP) dividends
|
|
|
(44,657
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(44,657
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(64,431
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(64,431
|
)
|
Common stock issuance (69 million shares issued at $10
per share, net of offering costs)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
659,659
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
659,659
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Common stock issued for
stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
Excess tax benefit (shortfall) from stock-based
compensation arrangements
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,531
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,531
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
5,359
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,359
|
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest of
subsidiary preferred stock
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,563
|
)
|
|
|
(8,563
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,780
|
)
|
|
|
(9,780
|
)
|
Other changes in equity
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Balance, September 30
|
|
|
$3,075,044
|
|
|
|
$295,165
|
|
|
|
$3,370,209
|
|
|
|
$2,577,641
|
|
|
|
$295,277
|
|
|
|
$2,872,918
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(205,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126,476
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided/(used) by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
745,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
Benefit for deferred income tax
|
|
|
(95,169
|
)
|
|
|
(221,764
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment
|
|
|
24,663
|
|
|
|
31,995
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
|
|
6,424
|
|
Net other amortization and accretion
|
|
|
33,183
|
|
|
|
34,236
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in derivatives, net
|
|
|
151,077
|
|
|
|
(33,393
|
)
|
Market value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
(42,662
|
)
|
|
|
63,769
|
|
Provision for foreclosure losses
|
|
|
94,775
|
|
|
|
10,432
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on divestitures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,913
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
5,359
|
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
Equity securities (gains)/losses, net
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(63,833
|
)
|
Debt securities gains, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
Gains on repurchases of debt
|
|
|
(12,860
|
)
|
|
|
(31,515
|
)
|
Net losses on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
5,907
|
|
|
|
23,795
|
|
Net (increase)/decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
184,481
|
|
|
|
76,639
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
63,967
|
|
|
|
2,775,183
|
|
Capital markets receivables
|
|
|
380,983
|
|
|
|
(1,127,128
|
)
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
8,222
|
|
|
|
24,753
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(70,440
|
)
|
|
|
122,709
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets payables
|
|
|
(572,599
|
)
|
|
|
1,058,760
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
(26,255
|
)
|
|
|
(38,792
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(86,133
|
)
|
|
|
(300,074
|
)
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
|
55,791
|
|
|
|
(175,248
|
)
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
866,174
|
|
|
|
3,061,723
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
660,583
|
|
|
|
2,935,247
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Available for sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
42,756
|
|
|
|
104,940
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
552,043
|
|
|
|
503,984
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(69,850
|
)
|
|
|
(348,888
|
)
|
Premises and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(18,427
|
)
|
|
|
(37,050
|
)
|
Net (increase)/decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization retained interests classified as trading securities
|
|
|
60,134
|
|
|
|
43,237
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,067,162
|
|
|
|
272,115
|
|
Interest-bearing cash
|
|
|
41,440
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
Cash payments related to divestitures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(20,518
|
)
|
|
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities
|
|
|
2,675,258
|
|
|
|
519,936
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(64,069
|
)
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
659,660
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,531
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid - preferred stock - CPP
|
|
|
(32,616
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash dividends paid - preferred stock - noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(9,803
|
)
|
|
|
(11,584
|
)
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,002
|
|
Payments/Maturities
|
|
|
(1,484,294
|
)
|
|
|
(1,354,261
|
)
|
Cash paid for repurchase of debt
|
|
|
(151,910
|
)
|
|
|
(212,260
|
)
|
Net increase/(decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(6,807
|
)
|
|
|
(2,785,070
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(2,023,923
|
)
|
|
|
(233,805
|
)
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(3,709,738
|
)
|
|
|
(3,977,668
|
)
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(373,897
|
)
|
|
|
(522,485
|
)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,324,780
|
|
|
|
2,259,715
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
950,883
|
|
|
$
|
1,737,230
|
|
|
Total interest paid
|
|
|
201,027
|
|
|
|
621,812
|
|
Total income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
106,886
|
|
|
$
|
183,536
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
7
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
Note 1 - Financial Information
The unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements of First Horizon National
Corporation (FHN), including its subsidiaries, have been prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within
the industries in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the financial
statements and could differ from actual results. In the opinion of management, all necessary
adjustments have been made for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations
for the periods presented. The operating results for the interim 2009 periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected going forward. For further information, refer to
the audited consolidated financial statements in the 2008 Annual Report to shareholders.
Subsequent Events.
Events occurring after the date of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition but before the issuance of the financial statements included in this filing have been
evaluated through the time of this filing.
Investment Securities.
Securities that FHN has the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity
are classified as securities held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The amortized cost
of all securities is adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount to maturity, or
earlier call date if appropriate, using the level yield method. Such amortization and accretion is
included in interest income from securities. Investment securities are reviewed quarterly for
possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and
circumstances of each individual investment such as the degree of loss, the length of time the fair
value has been below cost, the expectation for that securitys performance, the creditworthiness of
the issuer and FHNs intent and ability to hold the security. Securities that may be sold prior to
maturity and equity securities are classified as securities available for sale and are carried at
fair value. The unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, including debt
securities for which no credit impairment exists, are excluded from earnings and are reported, net
of tax, as a component of other comprehensive income within shareholders equity.
Upon adoption of the provisions of the FASB Codification update to FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 320-10-35 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the intent and ability to hold
to recovery indicator was replaced for debt securities with a requirement that an entitys
management assess whether it intends to sell a security or if it is more-likely-than-not that it
will be required to sell the security prior to recovery for the debt security when determining
other-than-temporary impairment. Realized gains and losses for investment securities are determined
by the specific identification method and reported in noninterest income. Declines in value judged
to be other-than-temporary based on FHNs analysis of the facts and circumstances related to an
individual investment, including securities that FHN has the intent to sell, are also determined by
the specific identification method, and reported in noninterest income. After adoption of the
amendments to ASC 320-10-35, for impaired debt securities that FHN does not intend to sell and will
not be required to sell prior to recovery but for which credit losses exist, the
other-than-temporary impairment recognized has been separated between the total impairment related
to credit losses which is reported in noninterest income, and the impairment related to all other
factors which is excluded from earnings and reported, net of tax, as a component of other
comprehensive income within shareholders equity. Currently, FHN does not have other than
temporarily impaired debt securities for which credit losses exist.
Loans Held for Sale and Securitization.
In conjunction with the adoption of the provisions of the
FASB Codification update to ASC 820-10, FHN revised its methodology for determining the fair value
of certain loans within its mortgage warehouse. FHN now determines the fair value of the
applicable loans using a discounted cash flow model using observable inputs, including current
mortgage rates for similar products, with adjustments for differences in loan characteristics
reflected in the models discount rates. This change in methodology had a minimal effect on the
valuation of the applicable loans. Previously, fair values of these loans were determined through
reference to recent security trade prices for similar products, published third party bids or
observable whole loan sale prices with adjustments for differences in loan characteristics.
Accounting Changes.
Effective September 30, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of FASB Codification
Update 2009-01 which creates ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC 105
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the single source of
authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP, other than guidance
issued by the SEC. Under ASC 105, all guidance contained in the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification carries an equal level of authority, with ASC 105 superseding all non-SEC accounting
and reporting standards which existed as of its effective date. The effect of adopting the
provisions of ASC 105 was immaterial to
8
Note 1 - Financial Information (continued)
FHN. In accordance with ASC 105, all references to authoritative accounting standards have
been revised to reflect their Codification citation.
Effective June 30, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of the FASB Codification update to ASC
825-10-50, which requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements. ASC 825-10-50, as amended, requires that disclosures be included in both
interim and annual financial statements of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate
the fair value of financial instruments. Comparative disclosures are required only for periods
ending subsequent to initial adoption. Upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 825-10-50, FHN
revised its disclosures accordingly.
Effective June 30, 2009, FHN adopted ASC 855-10 which provides general standards of accounting for
and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued. ASC 855-10-50 requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have
been evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date
the financial statements were available to be issued. An assessment of subsequent events must be
performed for both interim and annual reporting periods. FHN initially applied the guidance of ASC
855-10 when assessing subsequent events through the time of the filing of the financial statements
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and the effects of adoption were not material.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a Codification update to ASC 320-10-35 which replaces the intent
and ability to hold to recovery indicator of other-than-temporary impairment in ASC 320-10-35 for
debt securities. The updated provisions of ASC 320-10-35 specify that a debt security is
considered other-than-temporarily impaired when an entitys management intends to sell the security
or that it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will be required to sell the security
prior to recovery of its cost basis. ASC 320-10-35, as amended, requires that for impaired
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities that an entity does not intend to sell and
will not be required to sell prior to recovery but for which credit losses exist, the
other-than-temporary impairment should be separated between the total impairment related to credit
losses, which should be recognized in current earnings, and the amount of impairment related to all
other factors, which should be recognized in other comprehensive income. ASC 320-10-35, as
amended, discusses the proper interaction of its guidance with SEC Staff Accounting BulletinTopic
5M, which provides additional factors that must be considered in an other-than-temporary impairment
analysis. ASC 320-10-35, as amended, also provides that in periods in which other-than-temporary
impairments are recognized, the total impairment must be presented in the investors income
statement with an offset for the amount of total impairment that is recognized in other
comprehensive income. ASC 320-10-35 requires additional disclosures including a rollforward of
amounts recognized in earnings for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment has
been recognized and the noncredit portion of the other-than-temporary impairment that has been
recognized in other comprehensive income. FHN initially applied the guidance provided in the
Codification update to ASC 320-10-35 when assessing debt securities for other-than-temporary
impairment as of March 31, 2009 and the effects of adoption were not material.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a Codification update to ASC 820-10 which provides factors that an
entity should consider when determining whether a market for an asset is not active. If after
evaluating the relevant factors, the evidence indicates that a market is not active, ASC 820-10
provides an additional list of factors that an entity must consider when determining whether events
and circumstances indicate that a transaction which occurred in such inactive market is orderly.
ASC 820-10, as amended, requires that entities place more weight on observable transactions
determined to be orderly and less weight on transactions for which there is insufficient
information to determine whether the transaction is orderly when determining the fair value of an
asset or liability. The Codification update to ASC 820-10 requires enhanced disclosures, including
disclosure of a change in valuation technique which results from its application and disclosure of
fair value measurements for debt and equity securities by major security types. FHN initially
applied the guidance provided in the Codification update to ASC 820-10 in its fair value
measurements as of March 31, 2009 and the effects of adoption were not significant.
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 820 for
existing fair value measurement requirements related to non-financial assets and liabilities which
are recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The effective date for the application of
ASC 820s measurement framework to such non-financial assets and liabilities was previously delayed
under transitional guidance issued by the FASB. ASC 820, as amended, establishes a hierarchy to be
used in performing measurements of fair value. Additionally, the updated provisions of ASC 820
emphasize that fair value should be determined from the perspective of a market participant while
also indicating that valuation methodologies should first reference available market data before
using internally developed assumptions. ASC 820, as amended, also provides expanded disclosure
requirements regarding the effects of fair value measurements on the financial statements. The
effect of adopting the updated provisions of ASC 820 for non-financial assets and liabilities which
are recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis on January 1, 2009, was not significant to
FHN. Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted
9
Note 1 - Financial Information (continued)
ASC 820s Codification update for existing fair value measurement requirements related to
financial assets and liabilities as well as to non-financial assets and liabilities which are
remeasured at least annually. Upon the adoption of the updated provisions of ASC 820 for financial
assets and liabilities as well as non-financial assets and liabilities remeasured at least annually
on January 1, 2008, a negative after-tax cumulative-effect adjustment of $12.5 million was made to
the opening balance of undivided profits for interest rate lock commitments which FHN previously
measured under the guidance of ASC 815-10-45. The effect of the change in accounting for these
interest rate lock commitments produced a $15.7 million negative effect on first quarter 2008
pre-tax earnings as the $14.2 million positive effect of delivering the loans associated with the
commitments existing at the beginning of the quarter was more than offset by a negative impact of
$29.9 million for commitments remaining on the balance sheet at quarter end that was previously
deferred under the guidance of ASC 815-10-45 until delivery of the associated loans. Second
quarter 2008 earnings were positively impacted by a net of $13.7 million as (1) FHN continued to
deliver loans that had been commitments upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 820, (2) some
commitments existing at March 31, 2008 were delivered as loans during the second quarter 2008 and
(3) additional commitments that would have been deferred under the guidance of ASC 815-10-45 were
made. Third quarter 2008 earnings were positively impacted by a net $20.8 million as (1) FHN
continued to deliver loans that had been commitments upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 820,
(2) some commitments existing at June 30, 2008 were delivered as loans during the third quarter
2008 and (3) additional commitments that would have been deferred under ASC 815-10-45 were made.
Substantially all commitments existing at August 31, 2008 were sold to MetLife Bank, N.A (MetLife).
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 805 and ASC
810. ASC 805, as amended, requires that an acquirer recognize the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination, as well as any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at their
fair values as of the acquisition date, with limited exceptions. Additionally, the updated
provisions of ASC 805 provide that an acquirer cannot specify an effective date for a business
combination that is separate from the acquisition date. ASC 805, as amended, also provides that
acquisition-related costs which an acquirer incurs should be expensed in the period in which the
costs are incurred and the services are received. ASC 810, as amended, requires that acquired
assets and liabilities be measured at full fair value without consideration to ownership
percentage. Under the updated provisions of ASC 810, any noncontrolling interests in an acquiree
should be presented as a separate component of equity rather than on a mezzanine level.
Additionally, ASC 810, as amended, provides that net income or loss should be reported in the
consolidated income statement at its consolidated amount, with disclosure on the face of the
consolidated income statement of the amount of consolidated net income which is attributable to the
parent and noncontrolling interests, respectively. The retrospective application of ASC 810s
presentation and disclosure requirements resulted in an increase to consolidated net income of $2.9
million for third quarter 2008, and $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. FHN
also recognized an increase of total shareholders equity of $295.2 million upon adoption of the
amendments to ASC 810 as a result of reclassifying the noncontrolling interest previously
recognized on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as Preferred stock of subsidiary
as a separate component of equity.
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of an additional Codification update to ASC
805 which requires that an acquirer recognize at fair value as of the acquisition date an asset
acquired or liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the
acquisition-date fair value of the asset or liability can be determined during the measurement
period. ASC 805, as amended, provides that if the acquisition-date fair value of an asset acquired
or liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency cannot be determined
during the measurement period, the asset or liability should be recognized at the acquisition date
if information available before the end of the measurement period indicates that it is probable
that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and the amount of
the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. Additionally, ASC 805, as amended, requires
enhanced disclosures regarding assets and liabilities arising from contingencies which are
recognized at the acquisition date of a business combination, including the nature of the
contingencies, the amounts recognized at the acquisition date and the measurement basis applied.
The adoption of the Codification update to ASC 805 had no effect on FHNs statement of condition or
results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 815-10-50
which provides amendments that enhance disclosures related to derivatives accounted for in
accordance with ASC 815 and reconsiders existing disclosure requirements for such derivatives and
any related hedging items. The additional disclosures provided in ASC 815-10-50, as amended, are
required for both interim and annual reporting periods. Upon adoption of the Codification update
to ASC 815-10-50, FHN revised its disclosures accordingly.
FHN also adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 860-10 as of January 1, 2009, for
initial transfers of financial assets executed after such date. The Codification update amends ASC
860-10 to permit a transferor and transferee to separately account for an initial transfer of a
financial asset and a related repurchase financing that are entered into contemporaneously with, or
in contemplation of, one another if certain specified conditions are met at the inception of the
transaction. ASC 860-10, as amended, requires that the two
10
Note 1 - Financial Information (continued)
transactions have a valid and distinct business or economic purpose for being entered into
separately and that the repurchase financing not result in the initial transferor regaining control
over the previously transferred financial asset. The effect of adopting the Codification update to
ASC 860-10 was immaterial to FHN.
Effective December 31, 2008, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 325 which
aligns its impairment model for beneficial interests in securitized financial assets with the
impairment model in ASC 320, resulting in a consistent determination of whether
other-than-temporary impairments of available for sale or held to maturity debt securities have
occurred. Since FHN recognizes all retained interests from securitization transactions at fair
value as trading securities and as all of its beneficial interests classified as available for sale
securities are outside the scope of ASC 325, the effect of adopting the Codification update to ASC
325 was immaterial to FHN.
Effective December 31, 2008, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 810 and
ASC 860 which require additional disclosures related to transfers of financial assets as well as
FHNs involvement with variable interest entities and qualifying special purpose entities. Upon
adoption of the Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860, FHN revised its disclosures
accordingly.
Effective December 31, 2008, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 815-10-50
which requires sellers of credit derivatives and similar guarantee contracts to make disclosures
regarding the nature, term, fair value, potential losses and recourse provisions for those
contracts. Since FHN is not a seller of credit derivatives or similar financial guarantees, the
effect of adopting the Codification update to ASC 815-10-50 was immaterial to FHN.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 825 which
allows an irrevocable election to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on
an instrument-by-instrument basis, with unrealized gains and losses recognized currently in
earnings. Under ASC 825, the fair value option may only be elected at the time of initial
recognition of a financial asset or liability or upon the occurrence of certain specified events.
Additionally, ASC 825 provides that application of the fair value option must be based on the fair
value of an entire financial asset or liability and not selected risks inherent in those assets or
liabilities. ASC 825 requires that assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value
pursuant to the fair value option be reported in the financial statements in a manner that
separates those fair values from the carrying amounts of similar assets and liabilities which are
measured using another measurement attribute. ASC 825 also provides expanded disclosure
requirements regarding the effects of electing the fair value option on the financial statements.
Upon adoption of the updated provisions of ASC 825, FHN elected the fair value option on a
prospective basis for almost all types of mortgage loans originated for sale purposes.
Additionally, in accordance with ASC 825s amendment of ASC 320, FHN began prospectively
classifying cash flows associated with its retained interests in securitizations recognized as
trading securities within investing activities in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash
Flows.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan
Commitments Recorded at Fair ValueThrough Earnings (SAB No. 109) prospectively for derivative loan
commitments issued or modified after that date. SAB No. 109 rescinds SAB No. 105s prohibition on
inclusion of expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities in the fair value
measurement of a written loan commitment. SAB No. 109 also applies to any loan commitments for
which fair value accounting is elected under ASC 825. FHN did not elect fair value accounting for
any other loan commitments under ASC 825. The prospective application of SAB No. 109 and the
prospective election to recognize substantially all new mortgage loan originations at fair value
under ASC 825 resulted in a positive impact of $58.1 million on first quarter 2008 pre-tax
earnings. Second quarter 2008 earnings were negatively impacted by $20.9 million related to the
adoption of SAB No. 109 and the updated provisions of ASC 825 as loans and commitments remaining on
the balance sheet at the end of first quarter 2008 were sold. Third quarter 2008 earnings were
negatively affected by $35.2 million related to the adoption of SAB No. 109 and the updated
provisions of ASC 825 as remaining loans and commitments on the balance sheet were sold either as
part of the transaction with MetLife Bank, N.A. or through subsequent deliveries of the mortgage
warehouse.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update which amended ASC
820 to exclude ASC 840, Leases, from its scope. The adoption of the Codification update to ASC
820 had no effect on FHNs statement of condition or results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 715 which
requires that a liability be recognized for contracts written to employees which provide future
postretirement benefits that are covered by endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements
because such obligations are not considered to be effectively settled upon entering into the
related insurance arrangements. FHN recognized a decrease to undivided profits of $8.5 million,
net of tax, upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 715.
11
Note 1 - Financial Information (continued)
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 815
which permits the offsetting of fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash
collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral against fair value amounts recognized for
derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting
arrangement. Upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 815, entities were permitted to change their
previous accounting policy election to offset or not offset fair value amounts recognized for
derivative instruments under master netting arrangements. ASC 815, as amended, requires additional
disclosures for derivatives and collateral associated with master netting arrangements, including
the separate disclosure of amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the
obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements as of the end of each
reporting period for entities that made an accounting policy decision to not offset fair value
amounts. FHN retained its previous accounting policy election to not offset fair value amounts
recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements upon adoption of the
updated provisions of ASC 815, and has revised its disclosures accordingly.
FHN also adopted the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 815-20-25 as of January 1, 2008,
for hedging relationships designated on or after such date. The updated provisions of ASC
815-20-25 explicitly permit use of the shortcut method for hedging relationships in which an
interest rate swap has a nonzero fair value at inception of the hedging relationship which is
attributable solely to the existence of a bid-ask spread in the entitys principal market under ASC
820. Additionally, ASC 815-20-25, as amended, allows an entity to apply the shortcut method to a
qualifying fair value hedge when the hedged item has a trade date that differs from its settlement
date because of generally established conventions in the marketplace in which the transaction to
acquire or issue the hedged item is executed. Preexisting shortcut hedging relationships were
analyzed as of the adoption date of the amendments to ASC 815-20-25 to determine whether they
complied with the revised shortcut criteria at their inception or should be dedesignated
prospectively. The adoption of the updated provisions of ASC 815-20-25 had no effect on FHNs
financial position or results of operations as all of FHNs preexisting hedging relationships met
the requirements of ASC 815-20-25, as amended, at their inception.
Accounting Changes Issued but Not Currently Effective
. In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 09-05). ASU 09-05 updates
ASC 820 to clarify that a quoted price for the identical liability, when traded as an asset in an
active market, is a Level 1 measurement for that liability when no adjustment to the quoted price
is required. ASU 09-05 further amends ASC 820 to provide that if a quoted price for an identical
liability does not exist in an active market, the fair value of the liability should be measured
using an approach that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of
unobservable inputs. Under the updated provisions of ASC 820, for such liabilities fair value will
be measured using either a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical
liability when traded as an asset, a valuation technique that uses the quoted price for similar
liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as an asset, or another valuation technique that is
consistent with the principles of ASC 820. The update to ASC 820 is effective for the first
reporting period beginning after the issuance of ASU 09-05. The adoption of the Codification
update to ASC 820 will not have a material effect on FHNs statement of condition or results of
operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a Codification update to ASC 860 which provides for the removal of
the qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) concept from GAAP, resulting in the evaluation of all
former QSPEs for consolidation on and after January 1, 2010 in accordance with ASC 810. The
amendments to ASC 860 modify the criteria for achieving sale accounting for transfers of financial
assets and define the term participating interest to establish specific conditions for reporting a
transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale. The updated provisions of ASC 860 also
provide that a transferor should recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets obtained
(including a transferors beneficial interest) and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer
of financial assets accounted for as a sale. ASC 860, as amended, requires enhanced disclosures
which are generally consistent with, and supersede, the disclosures previously required by the
Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860 which was effective for periods ending after December
15, 2008. The provisions of the Codification update to ASC 860 are effective prospectively for new
transfers of financial assets occurring in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and in
interim periods within those fiscal years. ASC 860s amended disclosure requirements should be
applied to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date of the Codification
update, with comparative disclosures required only for periods subsequent to initial adoption for
those disclosures not previously required under the Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860
which was effective for periods ending after December 15, 2008. FHN is currently assessing the
effects of adopting the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 860.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a Codification update to ASC 810 which revises the criteria for
determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) by replacing the
quantitative-based risks and rewards test previously required with a qualitative analysis. While
ASC 810, as amended, retains the previous guidance in ASC 810 which requires a reassessment of
whether an entity is a VIE only when certain triggering events occur, it adds an additional
criteria which triggers a reassessment of an entitys status when an event occurs such
12
Note 1 - Financial Information (continued)
that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting
rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. Additionally, the amendments to ASC 810
require continual reconsideration of conclusions regarding which interest holder is the VIEs
primary beneficiary. Following the Codification update, ASC 810 will require separate presentation
on the face of the balance sheet of the assets of a consolidated VIE that can only be used to
settle the VIEs obligations and the liabilities of a consolidated VIE for which creditors or
beneficial interest holders have no recourse to the general credit of the primary beneficiary
(e.g., consolidated residential mortgage securitization trusts). ASC 810, as amended, also
requires enhanced disclosures which are generally consistent with, and supersede, the disclosures
previously required by the Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860 which was effective for
periods ending after December 15, 2008. The provisions of the Codification update to ASC 810 are
effective for periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and require reevaluation under ASC 810s
amended consolidation requirements of all QSPEs and entities currently subject to ASC 810 as of the
beginning of the first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009. If consolidation of a
VIE is required upon initial adoption, the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the
VIE should be measured at their carrying amounts as if ASC 810, as amended, had been applied from inception of
the VIE, with any difference between the net amounts recognized and the amount of any previously
recognized interests reflected as a cumulative effect adjustment to undivided profits. However, if
determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling
interests of the VIE may be measured at fair value. Further, if determining the carrying amounts
is not practicable, and if the activities of the VIE are primarily related to securitizations or
other forms of asset-backed financings and the assets of the VIE can be used only to settle
obligations of the entity, then the assets and liabilities of the VIE may be measured at their
unpaid principal balances. The fair value option provided under ASC 825 may also be elected for
financial assets and financial liabilities requiring consolidation as a result of initial adoption,
provided that the election is made for all eligible financial assets and financial liabilities of
the VIE. If initial application of the amendments to ASC 810 results in deconsolidation of a VIE,
any retained interest in the VIE should be measured at its carrying value as if ASC 810, as
amended, had been applied from inception of the VIE. Comparative disclosures are required only for
periods subsequent to initial adoption for those disclosures not previously required under the
Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860 which was effective for periods ending after December
15, 2008.
FHN is continuing to assess the effects of adopting the Codification Update to ASC 810 on all of
its proprietary residential mortgage securitization trusts based on the size and priority of
interests retained. Presented below by the total percentage of denominated financial interests
retained in a trust are the aggregate unpaid principal balances as of September 30, 2009, of loans
held by FHNs off balance sheet proprietary first lien securitization trusts and off balance sheet
HELOC and home equity loan securitization trusts, as well as the nature of FHNs retained interests
in such trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Unpaid
|
|
|
Nature of Financial Interests
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
Principal Balance
|
|
|
Retained (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1%
|
|
|
$17,339,132
|
|
|
MSR & excess interest
|
Between 1% and 2%
|
|
|
1,275,366
|
|
|
(b)
|
Between 2% and 5%
|
|
|
336,082
|
|
|
(c)
|
Over 5%
|
|
|
35,680
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC and Home Equity Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$ 222,836
|
|
|
MSR & residual interest
|
|
(a)
|
|
In addition to the financial interests retained, which are listed in the table above, FHN
also retained non-financial interests including repurchase obligations, clean up calls, and
required servicing advances for all proprietary securitization trusts.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Interests retained include MSR and excess interest, as well as principal-only strips.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Interests retained include MSR and excess interest, as well as interest-only strips, principal-only strips, and/or subordinated bonds for certain securitizations.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Interests retained include MSR and excess interest, as well as subordinated bonds.
|
Based on its current level of involvement, upon adoption of the Codification update to ASC 810
proprietary first lien securitization trusts for which FHN retains over 5% of the denominated
financial interests will be consolidated by FHN as the retention of MSR and other retained
interests, including subordinated bonds, results in FHN being considered the trusts primary
beneficiary under the qualitative analysis required by ASC 810, as amended. Additionally, FHN
believes that upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 810 it is possible that it will
13
Note 1 - Financial Information (continued)
consolidate certain proprietary first lien securitization trusts where FHN and its
consolidated subsidiaries retain between 2% and 5% of the denominated financial interests, based on
the size and priority of the interests retained. Further, the previously off balance sheet HELOC
and home equity loan securitization trusts will be consolidated upon adoption of the amendments to
ASC 810 as FHN will be considered the primary beneficiary of those trusts based on its retention of
MSR and non-denominated residual interests.
In December 2008, the FASB issued a Codification Update to ASC 715 which provides detailed
disclosure requirements to enhance the disclosures about an employers postretirement benefit plan
assets currently required by ASC 715-20-50. The amendments to ASC 715 are effective prospectively
for annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. FHN is currently assessing the effects of
adopting the Codification update to ASC 715.
14
Note 2 - Acquisitions/Divestitures
Continuing the efforts to refocus on core businesses, a definitive agreement was reached with
Point Capital Partners LLC in third quarter 2009 for the sale of FTN Equity Capital Markets Corp.
(FTN ECM), the institutional equity research division of FTN Financial. While the sale is
expected to close in fourth quarter 2009 subject to regulatory approval and customary closing
conditions, FHN incurred a pre-tax goodwill impairment of $14.0 million (approximately $9 million
after taxes) in third quarter 2009. The financial results of FTN ECM, including the third quarter
goodwill impairment, are reflected in the Income/loss from discontinued operations, net of tax line
on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for all periods presented.
Effective August 31, 2008, FHN sold more than 230 retail and wholesale mortgage origination offices
nationwide, the loan origination and servicing platform, substantially all of FHNs mortgage
origination pipeline and related hedges, certain fixed assets and other associated assets to
MetLife. MetLife did not acquire any portion of FHNs mortgage loan warehouse. FHN retained its
mortgage operations in and around Tennessee, continuing to originate home loans for customers in
its regional banking market footprint. FHN also sold servicing assets, and related hedges, on
$19.1 billion of first lien mortgage loans and associated custodial deposits. Additionally, FHN
entered into a subservicing agreement with MetLife for the remainder of FHNs servicing portfolio.
MetLife generally paid book value for the assets and liabilities it acquired, less a purchase price
reduction. The assets and liabilities related to the mortgage operations divested were included in
the Mortgage Banking segment and were reflected as divestiture on the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Condition for the reporting period ended June 30, 2008. FHN recognized a loss on
divestiture of $17.5 million in the third quarter 2008 and a gain on divestiture of $0.9 million in
the fourth quarter of 2008. Gains and losses related to this transaction were included in the
noninterest income section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income as gains/losses on
divestitures.
Due to efforts initiated by FHN in 2007 to improve profitability, FHN sold 34 branches in Atlanta,
Baltimore, Dallas, and Northern Virginia which were outside the Regional Banks footprint. The
First Horizon Bank branch sales were completed in 2008 resulting in losses of $1.0 million, $0.4
million, and $1.0 million in the first, second, and fourth quarters of 2008, respectively.
Aggregate gains of $15.7 million were recognized in fourth quarter 2007 from the disposition of 15
of the branches. These transactions resulted in the transfer of certain loans, certain fixed
assets (including branch locations), and assumption of all the deposit relationships of the First
Horizon Bank branches that were divested. The assets and liabilities related to the First Horizon
Bank branches were included in the Regional Banking segment and were reflected as divestiture on
the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition for reporting periods ended prior to June 30,
2008. The gains and losses realized on the disposition of First Horizon Bank branches were
included in the noninterest income section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income as
gains and losses on divestitures.
In addition to the divestitures mentioned above, FHN acquires or divests assets from time to time
in transactions that are considered business combinations or divestitures but are not material to
FHN individually or in the aggregate.
15
Note 3 - Investment Securities
The following tables summarize FHNs available for sale securities on September 30, 2009, and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
$
|
47,964
|
|
|
|
$ 361
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
48,325
|
|
Government agency issued MBS (a)
|
|
|
995,576
|
|
|
|
58,338
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,053,914
|
|
Government agency issued CMO (a)
|
|
|
1,029,977
|
|
|
|
45,776
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,075,753
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies (a)
|
|
|
116,019
|
|
|
|
5,753
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
121,772
|
|
States and municipalities
|
|
|
46,090
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46,090
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
Equity (b)
|
|
|
297,565
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
297,866
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale (c)
|
|
$
|
2,535,403
|
|
|
$
|
110,624
|
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,645,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes securities issued by government sponsored entities.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes investments in FHLB stock of $125.5 million, FRB stock of $66.2 million, remainder is
venture capital, money market, and cost method investments.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Includes $2.2 billion of securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase and for other purposes. As of
September 30, 2009, FHN had pledged $1.4 billion of the $2.2 billion of available for sale
securities as collateral for securities sold under repurchase
agreements. Additionally, $46.9 million is restricted pursuant to reinsurance contract agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
$
|
47,897
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
48,031
|
|
Government agency issued MBS (a)
|
|
|
1,247,796
|
|
|
|
13,408
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
1,260,864
|
|
Government agency issued CMO (a)
|
|
|
1,080,662
|
|
|
|
14,617
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
1,094,788
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies (a)
|
|
|
133,402
|
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
135,320
|
|
States and municipalities
|
|
|
31,630
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31,674
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Equity (b)
|
|
|
267,876
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
267,927
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale (c)
|
|
$
|
2,811,637
|
|
|
$
|
30,372
|
|
|
$
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,840,739
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes securities issued by government sponsored entities.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes investments in FHLB stock of $124.0 million, FRB stock of $26.0 million, remainder is
venture capital, money market, and cost method investments.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Includes $2.5 billion of securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase and for other purposes. As of
September 30, 2008, FHN had pledged $1.4 billion of available for sale securities as collateral for
securities sold under repurchase agreements. Additionally, $50.7 million is restricted pursuant to reinsurance contract agreements.
|
16
Note 3 - Investment Securities (continued)
Provided below are the amortized cost and fair value by contractual maturity for the available
for sale securities portfolio on September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Fair
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
41,509
|
|
|
$
|
41,838
|
|
After 1 year; within 5 years
|
|
|
28,382
|
|
|
|
29,575
|
|
After 5 years; within 10 years
|
|
|
99,032
|
|
|
|
103,625
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
1,036,725
|
|
|
|
1,095,063
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,205,648
|
|
|
|
1,270,101
|
|
|
Government agency issued MBS and CMO
|
|
|
1,029,978
|
|
|
|
1,075,753
|
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
299,777
|
|
|
|
300,068
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,535,403
|
|
|
$
|
2,645,922
|
|
|
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the
right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
The table below provides information on realized gross gains and realized gross losses on
sales from the available for sale portfolio for the nine months ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sales
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
Gross losses on sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sales
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
65,939
|
|
|
|
66,169
|
|
Gross losses on sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Proceeds
from the sale of AFS securities generating gains or losses in the first nine months of
2009 and 2008 were $3.9 million and $67.2 million, respectively.
Losses totaling $.5 million and $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, were recognized for securities that, in the opinion of management have been
other-than-temporarily impaired. The other-than-temporarily impaired securities are
related to cost method investment securities.
17
Note 3 - Investment Securities (continued)
The following tables provide information on investments within the available for sale
portfolio that have unrealized losses on September 30, 2009, and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Equity
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
$ 306
|
|
|
|
$ (105
|
)
|
|
|
$ 306
|
|
|
|
$ (105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Government agency issued MBS
|
|
|
$ 67,057
|
|
|
$
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
|
|
$ 67,057
|
|
|
|
$ (340
|
)
|
Government agency issued CMO
|
|
|
81,425
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81,425
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
Other U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22,647
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
22,647
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
148,837
|
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
23,058
|
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
171,895
|
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
Equity
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
|
$ 148,837
|
|
|
$
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
$23,058
|
|
|
|
$ (422
|
)
|
|
|
$ 171,895
|
|
|
|
$ (1,270
|
)
|
|
FHN has reviewed investment securities that are in unrealized loss positions in accordance with its
accounting policy for other-than-temporary impairment and does not consider them
other-than-temporarily impaired. FHN does not intend to sell the debt securities and it is
more-likely-than-not that FHN will not be required to sell the securities prior to recovery.
Additionally, the decline in value is not attributable to credit losses. For equity securities,
FHN has both the ability and intent to hold these securities for the time necessary to recover the
amortized cost.
18
Note 4 - Loans
The composition of the loan portfolio is detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and industrial
|
|
$
|
6,920,916
|
|
|
$
|
7,642,684
|
|
|
|
$ 7,863,727
|
|
Real estate commercial
|
|
|
1,537,099
|
|
|
|
1,492,323
|
|
|
|
1,454,040
|
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
1,130,710
|
|
|
|
2,020,455
|
|
|
|
1,778,140
|
|
Retail:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential
|
|
|
7,590,699
|
|
|
|
8,192,926
|
|
|
|
8,161,435
|
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
361,930
|
|
|
|
1,201,911
|
|
|
|
980,798
|
|
Other retail
|
|
|
124,376
|
|
|
|
139,441
|
|
|
|
135,779
|
|
Credit card receivables
|
|
|
189,452
|
|
|
|
194,966
|
|
|
|
189,554
|
|
Real estate loans pledged against other collateralized
borrowings
|
|
|
669,503
|
|
|
|
717,192
|
|
|
|
714,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
18,524,685
|
|
|
|
21,601,898
|
|
|
|
21,278,190
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
944,765
|
|
|
|
760,456
|
|
|
|
849,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans
|
|
$
|
17,579,920
|
|
|
$
|
20,841,442
|
|
|
|
$ 20,428,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHN has a significant concentration of loans secured by residential real estate (51 percent of
total loans) primarily in three portfolios. The retail real estate residential portfolio including
real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings (45 percent of total loans) is
primarily comprised of home equity lines and loans. While this portfolio has been stressed by the
downturn in the housing market and rising unemployment, it contains loans extended to strong
borrowers with high credit scores and is geographically diversified. The Residential CRE portfolio,
included in Commercial Real Estate Construction, (4 percent of total loans) has also been
negatively impacted by the housing industry downturn as builder liquidity has been severely
stressed. The One-Time Close (OTC) portfolio, included in Retail Residential Construction (2
percent of total loans) has been negatively impacted by the downturn in the housing industry,
certain discontinued product types, and the decreased availability of permanent mortgage financing.
The size of the Residential CRE and OTC portfolios has significantly declined as FHN continues to
wind down the national construction portfolios.
Additionally, on September 30, 2009, FHN had bank-related and trust preferred loans (including
loans to bank and insurance-related businesses) totaling $.7 billion (4 percent of total loans)
that are included within the Commercial, Financial, and Industrial portfolio. Due to higher credit
losses experienced throughout the financial services industry and the limited availability of
market liquidity, these loans have experienced stress during the economic downturn.
On September 30, 2009, FHN did not have any concentrations of Commercial, Financial and Industrial
loans in any single industry of 10 percent or more of total loans.
Nonperforming loans consist of loans which management has identified as impaired, other nonaccrual
loans, and loans which have been restructured. On September 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no
significant outstanding commitments to advance additional funds to customers whose loans had been
restructured. The following table presents nonperforming loans on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
603,960
|
|
|
$
|
404,458
|
|
|
|
$ 474,090
|
|
Other nonaccrual loans*
|
|
|
515,759
|
|
|
|
495,518
|
|
|
|
579,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
$
|
1,119,719
|
|
|
$
|
899,976
|
|
|
|
$ 1,053,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
On September 30, 2009 and 2008, and on December 31, 2008, other nonaccrual loans included $32.3
million, $9.1 million, and $8.5 million, respectively, of loans held for sale.
|
19
Note 4 - Loans (continued)
Generally, interest payments received on impaired and nonaccrual loans are applied to
principal. Once all principal has been received, additional payments are recognized as interest
income on a cash basis. The following table presents information concerning impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total interest on impaired loans
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
Average balance of impaired loans
|
|
|
575,829
|
|
|
|
388,476
|
|
|
|
538,007
|
|
|
|
291,809
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses related to non-impaired and impaired loans for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Non-impaired
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance on December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
325,883
|
|
|
$
|
16,458
|
|
|
$
|
342,341
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
626,612
|
|
|
|
173,388
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
Divestitures/acquisitions/transfers
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(219,760
|
)
|
|
|
(173,581
|
)
|
|
|
(393,341
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
10,392
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
11,838
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(209,368
|
)
|
|
|
(172,135
|
)
|
|
|
(381,503
|
)
|
|
Balance on September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
742,745
|
|
|
$
|
17,711
|
|
|
$
|
760,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
836,907
|
|
|
$
|
12,303
|
|
|
$
|
849,210
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
510,164
|
|
|
|
234,836
|
|
|
|
745,000
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(441,523
|
)
|
|
|
(238,530
|
)
|
|
|
(680,053
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
26,764
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
30,608
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(414,759
|
)
|
|
|
(234,686
|
)
|
|
|
(649,445
|
)
|
|
Balance on September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
932,312
|
|
|
$
|
12,453
|
|
|
$
|
944,765
|
|
|
20
Note 5 - Mortgage Servicing Rights
FHN recognizes all classes of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) at fair value. Classes of MSR are
determined in accordance with FHNs risk management practices and market inputs used in determining
the fair value of the servicing asset. See Note 16 Fair Value, the Determination of Fair
Value section for a discussion of FHNs MSR valuation methodology. The balance of MSR included on
the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition represents the rights to service approximately
$43.1 billion of mortgage loans on September 30, 2009, for which a servicing right has been
capitalized.
In third quarter 2009, FHN reviewed the allocation of fair value between MSR and excess interest
from prior first lien loan sales and securitizations. As a result, $11.9 million was reclassified
from trading securities to MSR retained from securitizations and $.8 million was reclassified from
MSR retained from prior loan sales to trading securities. This reclassification is reflected in
the rollforwards below.
Following is a summary of changes in capitalized MSR related to proprietary securitization
activities utilizing qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) as of September 30, 2009, and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Liens
|
|
Liens
|
|
HELOC
|
|
Fair value on January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
230,311
|
|
|
$
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
$ 2,260
|
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Reductions due to loan payments
|
|
|
(20,079
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Changes in fair value due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions
|
|
|
(12,130
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
Other changes in fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Fair value on September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
198,102
|
|
|
$
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
$ 1,745
|
|
|
Fair value on January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
102,993
|
|
|
$
|
981
|
|
|
|
$ 1,471
|
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Reductions due to loan payments
|
|
|
(12,489
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Reclassification from/(to) trading securities
|
|
|
11,853
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in fair value due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions
|
|
|
4,270
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Fair value on September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
106,627
|
|
|
|
$928
|
|
|
|
$ 1,241
|
|
|
Servicing, late, and other ancillary fees recognized within mortgage banking income were $16.0
million and $20.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively,
related to securitization activity and $49.7 million and $64.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Servicing, late, and other ancillary fees recognized
within revenue from loan sales and securitizations were $.2 million and $.3 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively, related to securitization activity and
$.7 million and $.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
21
Note 5 - Mortgage Servicing Rights (continued)
Following is a summary of changes in capitalized MSR related to loan sale activity as of September
30, 2009, and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
Fair value on January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
892,104
|
|
|
$
|
24,403
|
|
|
$
|
9,313
|
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
240,676
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
Reductions due to loan payments
|
|
|
(76,058
|
)
|
|
|
(4,745
|
)
|
|
|
(1,370
|
)
|
Reductions due to sale
|
|
|
(436,595
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in fair value due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions
|
|
|
(48,376
|
)
|
|
|
(3,334
|
)
|
|
|
(1,803
|
)
|
Other changes in fair value
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
Fair value on September 30, 2008
|
|
|
$572,519
|
|
|
|
$16,330
|
|
|
|
$8,598
|
|
|
Fair value on January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
251,404
|
|
|
$
|
12,576
|
|
|
$
|
7,419
|
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reductions due to loan payments
|
|
|
(35,768
|
)
|
|
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
|
(1,464
|
)
|
Reductions due to sale
|
|
|
(77,591
|
)
|
|
|
(8,134
|
)
|
|
|
(1,548
|
)
|
Reclassification from/(to) trading securities
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in fair value due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions
|
|
|
38,347
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other changes in fair value
|
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
Fair value on September 30, 2009
|
|
|
$174,418
|
|
|
|
$922
|
|
|
|
$5,146
|
|
|
Servicing, late, and other ancillary fees recognized within mortgage banking income were $13.6
million and $29.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively,
related to loan sale activity and $42.8 million and $123.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Servicing, late, and other ancillary fees recognized
within revenue from loan sales and securitizations were $3.3 million and $3.8 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively, related to loan sale activity and $10.2
million and $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
FHN services a portfolio of mortgage loans related to transfers performed by other parties
utilizing QSPEs. FHNs servicing assets represent its sole interest in these transactions. The
total MSR recognized by FHN related to these transactions was $7.2 million and $47.9 million at
September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The aggregate principal balance serviced by FHN for
these transactions was $1.0 billion and $3.4 billion at September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
FHN has no obligation to provide financial support and has not provided any form of support to the
related trusts. The MSR recognized by FHN has been included in the first lien mortgage loans
column within the rollforward of MSR resulting from loan sales activity.
As of September 30, 2009, FHN had transferred $34.1 million of MSR to third parties in transactions
that did not qualify for sales treatment due to certain recourse provisions that were included
within the sale agreements. These MSR are included within the first liens mortgage loans column
within the rollforward of MSR resulting from loan sales activity. The proceeds from these
transfers have been recognized within other short term borrowings and commercial paper in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as of September 30, 2009.
22
Note 6
- Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, included in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets*
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
192,408
|
|
|
$
|
56,907
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,424
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,034
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
192,408
|
|
|
$
|
46,887
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
192,408
|
|
|
$
|
45,082
|
|
Impairment **
|
|
|
(14,027
|
)
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,590
|
)
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
178,381
|
|
|
$
|
40,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents customer lists, acquired contracts, premium on purchased deposits, and
covenants not to compete.
|
|
**
|
|
See Note 2 - Acquisitions/Divestitures for further details regarding goodwill impairment.
|
The gross carrying amount of other intangible assets subject to amortization is $126.4 million on
September 30, 2009, net of $85.9 million of accumulated amortization. Estimated aggregate
amortization expense is expected to be $1.5 million for the remainder of 2009, and $5.9 million,
$5.7 million, $4.3 million, $3.9 million, and $3.6 million for the twelve-month periods of 2010,
2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively.
The following is a summary of goodwill detailed by reportable segments for the nine months ended
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
77,342
|
|
|
$
|
115,066
|
|
|
$
|
192,408
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
77,342
|
|
|
$
|
115,066
|
|
|
$
|
192,408
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
77,342
|
|
|
$
|
115,066
|
|
|
$
|
192,408
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,027
|
)
|
|
|
(14,027
|
)
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
77,342
|
|
|
$
|
101,039
|
|
|
$
|
178,381
|
|
|
There is no goodwill associated with the Mortgage Banking, National Specialty Lending, and
Corporate segments.
23
Note 7
-
Regulatory Capital
FHN is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and
possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on FHNs financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain derivatives as calculated under
regulatory accounting practices must be met. Capital amounts and classification are also subject
to qualitative judgment by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require FHN to maintain
minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1
capital to average assets (leverage). Management believes, as of September 30, 2009, that FHN met
all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.
The actual capital amounts and ratios of FHN and FTBNA are presented in the table below. In
addition, FTBNA must also calculate its capital ratios after excluding financial subsidiaries as
defined by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Based on this calculation, FTBNAs Total Capital,
Tier 1 Capital, and Leverage ratios were 19.51 percent, 15.08 percent, and 12.47 percent,
respectively, on September 30, 2009, and were 14.65 percent, 10.43 percent, and 8.46 percent,
respectively, on September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Horizon
|
|
First Tennessee Bank
|
|
National Corporation
|
|
National Association
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
On September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
$
|
4,754,979
|
|
|
21.61%
|
|
$
|
4,532,949
|
|
|
20.82%
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
3,563,650
|
|
|
|
16.20
|
|
|
|
3,404,528
|
|
|
|
15.63
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
3,563,650
|
|
|
|
13.34
|
|
|
|
3,404,528
|
|
|
|
12.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
1,759,961
|
³
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
1,742,115
|
³
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
879,981
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
871,058
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
1,068,442
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
1,059,832
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well
Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,177,644
|
³
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306,587
|
³
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324,790
|
³
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
On September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
$
|
4,247,691
|
|
|
16.07%
|
|
$
|
4,076,009
|
|
|
15.54%
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
2,933,984
|
|
|
|
11.10
|
|
|
|
2,844,757
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
2,933,984
|
|
|
|
8.84
|
|
|
|
2,844,757
|
|
|
|
8.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
2,114,211
|
³
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
2,098,531
|
³
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
1,057,105
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
1,049,264
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
1,327,049
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
1,317,648
|
³
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well
Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,623,163
|
³
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,573,898
|
³
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,647,060
|
³
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
24
Note 8
- Earnings per Share
The following tables show a reconciliation of the numerators used in calculating earnings per share
attributable to common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(24,814
|
)
|
|
|
(120,471
|
)
|
|
|
(194,435
|
)
|
|
|
(122,499
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(10,200
|
)
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
(11,156
|
)
|
|
|
(3,977
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(35,014
|
)
|
|
|
(122,220
|
)
|
|
|
(205,591
|
)
|
|
|
(126,476
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
8,563
|
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
(37,983
|
)
|
|
|
(125,095
|
)
|
|
|
(214,154
|
)
|
|
|
(136,256
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
14,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(52,859
|
)
|
|
|
(125,095
|
)
|
|
|
(258,842
|
)
|
|
|
(136,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(24,814
|
)
|
|
|
(120,471
|
)
|
|
|
(194,435
|
)
|
|
|
(122,499
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
8,563
|
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
14,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(42,659
|
)
|
|
|
(123,346
|
)
|
|
|
(247,686
|
)
|
|
|
(132,279
|
)
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of weighted average common shares to diluted average
common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic (a)
|
|
|
217,186
|
|
|
|
217,062
|
|
|
|
217,152
|
|
|
|
182,858
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities (a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - diluted (a)
|
|
|
217,186
|
|
|
|
217,062
|
|
|
|
217,152
|
|
|
|
182,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
All share data has been restated to reflect stock dividends distributed through October 1, 2009.
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of earnings/(loss) per common and diluted share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
Earnings/(loss) per share common share:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
|
(1.14
|
)
|
|
|
(0.72
|
)
|
Loss per share from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
Net loss per share available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.58
|
)
|
|
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
|
(1.14
|
)
|
|
|
(0.72
|
)
|
Loss per share from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
Net loss per share available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.58
|
)
|
|
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
Due to the net loss attributable to common shareholders for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, no potentially dilutive shares were included in the loss per share calculations
as including such shares would have been antidilutive. Stock options of 13.8 million and 18.1
million with a weighted average exercise price of $29.16 and $30.03 per share for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively, were excluded. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, and 2008, stock options of 14.4 million and 18.8 million with a weighted
average exercise price of $29.33 and $30.53 per share were also excluded from diluted shares.
Other equity awards of 3.5 million and 1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
and 2008, respectively, and other equity awards of 3.0 million and 1.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively, were also excluded from diluted shares.
25
Note 8
- Earnings per Share (continued)
Additionally, 13.7 million potentially dilutive shares related to the CPP common stock warrant were
also excluded from the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, computation of diluted loss
per common share because such shares would have been antidilutive.
26
Note 9
- Contingencies and Other Disclosures
Contingencies.
Contingent liabilities arise in the ordinary course of business, including those
related to litigation. Various claims and lawsuits are pending against FHN and its subsidiaries.
In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal matters, particularly where
the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the cases present novel legal
theories or involve a large number of parties, FHN cannot state with confidence what the eventual
outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters
will be, or what the eventual loss or impact related to each pending matter may be. FHN establishes
loss contingency reserves for litigation matters when estimated loss is both probable and estimable
as prescribed by applicable financial accounting guidance. A reserve generally is not established
when a loss contingency either is not probable or its amount is not estimable. If loss for a
matter is probable and a range of possible loss outcomes is the best estimate available, accounting
guidance generally requires a reserve to be established at the low end of the range. Based on
current knowledge, and after consultation with counsel, management is of the opinion that loss
contingencies related to pending matters should not have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial condition of FHN, but may be material to FHNs operating results for any
particular reporting period.
FHN is a member of the Visa USA network. On October 3, 2007, the Visa organization of affiliated
entities completed a series of global restructuring transactions to combine its affiliated
operating companies, including Visa USA, under a single holding company, Visa Inc. (Visa). Upon
completion of the reorganization, the members of the Visa USA network remained contingently liable
for certain Visa litigation matters. Based on its proportionate membership share of Visa USA, FHN
recognized a contingent liability of $55.7 million within noninterest expense in fourth quarter
2007 related to this contingent obligation.
In March 2008, Visa completed its initial public offering (IPO). Visa funded an escrow account from
IPO proceeds that will be used to make payments related to the Visa litigation matters. Upon
funding of the escrow, FHN reversed $30.0 million of the contingent liability previously recognized
with a corresponding credit to noninterest expense for its proportionate share of the escrow
account. A portion of FHNs Class B shares of Visa were redeemed as part of the IPO resulting in
$65.9 million of equity securities gains in first quarter 2008.
In October 2008, Visa announced that it had agreed to settle litigation with Discover Financial
Services (Discover) for $1.9 billion. $1.7 billion of this settlement amount was funded from the
escrow account established as part of Visas IPO. In connection with this settlement, FHN
recognized additional expense of $11.0 million within noninterest expense in third quarter 2008.
In December 2008, Visa deposited additional funds into the escrow account and FHN recognized a
corresponding credit to noninterest expense of $11.0 million for its proportionate share of the
amount funded.
In July 2009, Visa deposited an additional $700 million into the escrow account. Accordingly, FHN
reduced its contingent liability by $7.0 million through a credit to noninterest expense.
After the partial share redemption in conjunction with the IPO, FHN holds approximately 2.4 million
Class B shares of Visa, which are included in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition at
their historical cost of $0. Conversion of these shares into Class A shares of Visa and, with
limited exceptions, transfer of these shares are restricted until the later of the third
anniversary of the IPO and the final resolution of the covered litigation. The final conversion
ratio, which was estimated to approximate 58 percent as of September 30, 2009, will fluctuate based
on the ultimate settlement of the Visa litigation matters for which FHN has a proportionate
contingent obligation. Future funding of the escrow will dilute this exchange rate by an amount
that is yet to be determined.
Other disclosures Indemnification agreements and guarantees.
In the ordinary course of business,
FHN enters into indemnification agreements for legal proceedings against its directors and officers
and standard representations and warranties for underwriting agreements, merger and acquisition
agreements, loan sales, contractual commitments, and various other business transactions or
arrangements. The extent of FHNs obligations under these agreements depends upon the occurrence
of future events; therefore, it is not possible to estimate a maximum potential amount of payouts
that could be required with such agreements.
FHN is subject to potential liabilities and losses in relation to loans that it services, and in
relation to loans that it originated and sold. FHN evaluates those potential liabilities and
maintains reserves for potential losses. In addition, FHN has arrangements with the purchaser of
its national home loan origination and servicing platforms that create obligations and potential
liabilities.
Servicing.
FHN services a mortgage loan portfolio of $43.1 billion as of September 30, 2009, a
significant portion of which is held by FNMA and private security holders, with less significant
portions held by GNMA and FHLMC. In connection with its servicing activities, FHN collects and
remits the principal and interest payments on the underlying loans for the account of the
appropriate investor. In the event of delinquent or non -payment on a loan in a private or agency
securitization: (1) the terms of the private securities agreements require FHN, as servicer, to
continue to make monthly advances of principal and interest (P&I) to the trustee for the benefit of
the investors; and (2) the terms of the
27
Note 9
- Contingencies and Other Disclosures (continued)
majority of the agency agreements may require the servicer to make advances of P&I, or to
repurchase the delinquent or defaulted loan out of the trust pool. For servicer advances of P&I
under the terms of private and FNMA (and GNMA pools) securitizations, FHN can utilize payments of
P&I received from other prepaid loans within a particular loan pool in order to advance P&I to the
trustee. In the event payments are ultimately made by FHN to satisfy this obligation, P&I advances
and servicer advances are recoverable from: (1) in the case of private securitizations, the
liquidation proceeds of the property securing the loan and (2) in the case of agency loans, from
the proceeds of the foreclosure sale by the Government Agency. See Note 13 Loan Sales and
Securitizations for additional information on loans sold with recourse.
FHN is also subject to losses in its loan servicing portfolio due to loan foreclosures.
Foreclosure exposure arises from certain agency agreements which limit the agencys repayment
guarantees on foreclosed loans, resulting in certain foreclosure costs being borne by servicers.
Foreclosure exposure also includes real estate costs, marketing costs, and costs to maintain
properties, especially during protracted resale periods in geographic areas of the country hard hit
by declining home values.
FHN is also subject to losses due to under-compensated servicing expenditures made in connection
with the administration of current governmental and/or regulatory loss mitigation and loan
modification programs. Additionally, FHN is required to repurchase GNMA loans prior to
modification.
Loans Originated and Sold.
For many years FHN originated loans, primarily first and second lien
home loans, with the intention of selling them. Sometimes the loans were sold with full or limited
recourse, but much more often the loans were sold without recourse. For loans sold with recourse,
FHN has indemnity and repurchase exposure if the loans default. For loans sold without recourse,
FHN has repurchase exposure primarily for defaults occurring within a specified period following
the sale, and for claims that FHN breached its representations and warranties made to the
purchasers at the time of sale.
FHN has various claims outstanding with government agencies and private investors for cure of loan
defects, such as missing title insurance, and for repurchase and/or indemnification. FHN has
evaluated its exposure under these obligations based on factors such as breach of representations
and warranties, early loan delinquency and default status, foreclosure expectancy rates and
indemnification claims and accordingly, reserved for losses of approximately $60.9 million and $36.7 million on September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
FHN has sold certain agency mortgage loans with full recourse under agreements to repurchase the
loans upon default. For mortgage insured single-family residential loans, in the event of borrower
nonperformance, FHN would assume losses to the extent they exceed the value of the collateral and
private mortgage insurance, FHA insurance, or VA guaranty. On September 30, 2009 and 2008, FHN had
single-family residential loans with outstanding balances of $71.6 million and $83.4 million,
respectively, that were serviced on a full recourse basis. On September 30, 2009 and 2008, the
outstanding principal balance of loans sold with limited recourse arrangements where some portion
of the principal is at risk and serviced by FHN was $3.3 billion at the end of both periods.
Additionally, on September 30, 2009 and 2008, $1.1 billion and $.7 billion, respectively, of
mortgage loans were outstanding which were sold under limited recourse arrangements where the risk
is limited to interest and servicing advances.
FHN has securitized and sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages which are held by private security
holders, and on September 30, 2009, the outstanding principal balance of these loans was $180.4
million and $42.4 million, respectively. On September 30, 2008, the outstanding principal balance
of securitized and sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages was $219.7 million and $57.9 million,
respectively. In connection with its servicing activities, FTBNA does not guarantee the receipt of
the scheduled principal and interest payments on the underlying loans but does have residual
interests of $5.0 million and $7.4 million on September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are
available to make the security holder whole in the event of credit losses. FHN has projected
expected credit losses in the valuation of the residual interest.
FHN has also sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages without recourse through whole loan sales. In
third quarter 2009, FHN settled a substantial portion of its repurchase obligations through an
agreement with the primary purchaser of HELOC and second lien loans that were previously
transferred through whole loan sales. This settlement included the transfer of retained servicing
rights associated with the applicable prior second lien and HELOC loan sales. On September 30,
2008, the outstanding principal balance of HELOC and second-lien mortgages sold without recourse
through whole loan sales was $1.0 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively. FHN does not guarantee
the receipt of the scheduled principal and interest payments on the underlying loans but does have
an obligation to repurchase the loans excluded from the above settlement for which there is a
breach of representations and warranties provided to the buyers. The remaining repurchase
obligation is minimal reflecting the settlement discussed above.
28
Note 9
- Contingencies and Other Disclosures (continued)
A wholly-owned subsidiary of FHN has agreements with several providers of private mortgage
insurance whereby the subsidiary has agreed to accept insurance risk for specified loss corridors
for loans originated in each contract year in exchange for a portion of the private mortgage
insurance premiums paid by borrowers (i.e., reinsurance arrangements). The loss corridors vary for
each primary insurer for each contract year. No new reinsurance arrangements have been initiated
after 2008. In third quarter 2009, FHN agreed to settle certain of its reinsurance obligations
with a primary insurer, resulting in a decrease in the reserve balance and the associated trust
assets. As of September 30, 2009, FHN has reserved $44.5 million for its estimated liability under
the reinsurance arrangements. In accordance with the terms of the contracts with the primary
insurers, as of September 30, 2009, FHN has placed $46.9 million of prior premium collections in
trust for payment of claims arising under the reinsurance arrangements.
2008 Sale of National Origination and Servicing Platforms.
In conjunction with the sale of its
servicing platform in August 2008, FHN entered into a three year subservicing arrangement with the
purchaser for the unsold portion of FHNs servicing portfolio. As part of the subservicing
agreement, FHN has agreed to a make-whole arrangement whereby if the number of loans subserviced by
the purchaser falls below specified levels and the direct servicing cost per loan is greater than a
specified amount (determined using loans serviced on behalf of both FHN and the purchaser), FHN
will make a payment according to a contractually specified formula. The make-whole payment is
subject to a cap, which was $19.4 million if determined in the four quarters immediately following
the transaction, and which declined to $15.0 million if triggered in the following eight quarters.
As part of the 2008 transaction, FHN recognized a contingent liability of $1.2 million representing
the estimated fair value of its performance obligation under the make-whole arrangement.
29
Note 10 Pension and Other Employee Benefits
Pension plan.
FHN closed participation in the noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension
plan to employees hired or re-hired on September 1, 2007 or later. This did not impact the
benefits of employees currently participating in the plan. Certain employees of FHNs insurance
subsidiaries are not covered by the pension plan. Pension benefits are based on years of service,
average compensation near retirement, and estimated social security benefits at age 65. FHN
contributions are based upon actuarially determined amounts necessary to fund the total benefit
obligation. FHN is likely to make a contribution to the qualified pension plan in December 2009
attributable to the 2009 plan year. This decision will be based upon pension funding requirements
under the Pension Protection Act, the maximum deductible under the Internal Revenue Code, and the
actual performance of plan assets during 2009. Given these uncertainties, we cannot estimate the
amount of a future contribution at this time. The non-qualified pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans are unfunded. Contributions to these plans cover all benefits paid
under the non-qualified plans. This amount was $6.2 million for 2008 and will be $6.5 million by
the end of 2009.
FHN also maintains nonqualified plans including a supplemental retirement plan that covers certain
employees whose benefits under the pension plan have been limited. Additionally, a program was
added under the FHN savings plan that is provided only to employees who are not eligible for the
pension plan. FHN made a contribution of $.5 million for this plan in 2009 related to the 2008
plan year.
Other employee benefits.
FHN provides post-retirement life insurance benefits to certain
employees. FHN also provides post-retirement medical insurance to retirement-eligible employees.
The post-retirement medical plan is contributory with retiree contributions adjusted annually and
is based on criteria that are a combination of the employees age and years of service. For any
employee retiring on or after January 1, 1995, FHN contributes a fixed amount based on years of
service and age at the time of retirement. FHNs post-retirement benefits include prescription
drug benefits. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (the
Act) introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D as well as a federal subsidy to
sponsors of retiree health care that provide a benefit that is actuarially equivalent to Medicare
Part D. FHN anticipates receiving a prescription drug subsidy under the Act through 2012.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended September 30 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,816
|
|
|
$
|
3,448
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,008
|
|
|
|
7,432
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(11,582
|
)
|
|
|
(11,621
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
Prior service cost/(credit)
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Actuarial loss/(gain)
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
ASC 715 Settlement Expense
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Total ASC 715 Expense
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
30
Note 10 Pension and Other Employee Benefits (continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the nine months ended September 30 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
10,619
|
|
|
$
|
11,862
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
23,860
|
|
|
|
22,117
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(34,745
|
)
|
|
|
(35,204
|
)
|
|
|
(850
|
)
|
|
|
(1,314
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
Prior service cost/(credit)
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
Actuarial loss/(gain)
|
|
|
6,170
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
6,473
|
|
|
$
|
1,254
|
|
|
$
|
3,465
|
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
ASC 715 Settlement Expense
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Total ASC 715 Expense
|
|
$
|
6,473
|
|
|
$
|
2,080
|
|
|
$
|
3,465
|
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
In third quarter 2009, FHN revised its estimate of annual pension and postretirement expense
resulting in a $2.8 million reduction of net periodic benefit cost. The revised estimate and
adjustment are reflected in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, in the above
tables.
The 2009 net periodic benefit costs of Other Benefits includes the first quarter 2009 expense
related to company-paid life insurance benefits offered to certain employees beyond retirement. A
liability for these benefits was not previously recorded as premiums but was expensed when
incurred. A $10.7 million cumulative adjustment related to prior periods is not included in the
2009 net periodic benefit cost presented above. Post-retirement benefits payable to active
employees under this plan were modified in third quarter 2009. As a result of this change, FHN
recognized a reduction in its benefit liability of $17.1 million with an offset, net of tax, to
accumulated other comprehensive income.
In 2008, distributions from a non-qualified post-retirement plan in conjunction with an early
retirement triggered settlement accounting. In accordance with its practice, FHN performed a
remeasurement of the plan in conjunction with the settlement and recognized $.8 million in
settlement expense.
31
Note 11 Business Segment Information
FHN has five business segments, Regional Banking, Capital Markets, National Specialty Lending,
Mortgage Banking, and Corporate. The Regional Banking segment offers financial products and
services, including traditional lending and deposit taking, to retail and commercial customers in
Tennessee and surrounding markets. Additionally, Regional Banking provides investments, insurance,
financial planning, trust services and asset management, credit card, cash management, and check
clearing services. The Capital Markets segment consists of traditional capital markets securities
activities, loan sales, portfolio advisory, derivative sales, correspondent banking, and equity
research. The operational results of Capital Markets institutional equity research business,
FTN ECM, is inlcuded in Capital Markets discontinued operations, net of tax, line item for a all
periods presented. Restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency charges from this business are
included in discontinued operations within the Corporate segment. The National Specialty Lending
segment consists of traditional consumer and construction lending activities in other national
markets. The Mortgage Banking segment consists of core mortgage banking elements including
originations and servicing and the associated ancillary revenues related to these businesses. In
August 2008, FHN completed the divestiture of certain mortgage banking operations to MetLife. FHN
continues to originate loans in and around the Tennessee banking footprint and to service the
remaining servicing portfolio. The Corporate segment consists of restructuring, repositioning and
efficiency initiatives, gains on the repurchase of debt, unallocated corporate expenses, expense on
subordinated debt issuances and preferred stock, bank-owned life insurance, unallocated interest
income associated with excess equity, net impact of raising incremental capital, revenue and
expense associated with deferred compensation plans, funds management, low income housing
investment activities, and venture capital.
Periodically, FHN adapts its segments to reflect changes in expense allocations among segments. For
comparability, previously reported items have been revised to reflect these changes. Total revenue,
expense, and asset levels reflect those which are specifically identifiable or which are allocated
based on an internal allocation method. Because the allocations are based on internally developed
assignments and allocations, they are to an extent subjective. This assignment and allocation has
been consistently applied for all periods presented. The following table reflects the amounts of
consolidated revenue, expense, tax, and assets for each segment for the three and nine months ended
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
190,901
|
|
|
$
|
223,147
|
|
|
$
|
586,574
|
|
|
$
|
690,134
|
|
Provision for loan loss
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
745,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
303,818
|
|
|
|
296,073
|
|
|
|
987,347
|
|
|
|
1,124,052
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
349,901
|
|
|
|
387,515
|
|
|
|
1,160,190
|
|
|
|
1,259,773
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(40,182
|
)
|
|
|
(208,295
|
)
|
|
|
(331,269
|
)
|
|
|
(245,587
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(15,368
|
)
|
|
|
(87,824
|
)
|
|
|
(136,834
|
)
|
|
|
(123,088
|
)
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(24,814
|
)
|
|
|
(120,471
|
)
|
|
|
(194,435
|
)
|
|
|
(122,499
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(10,200
|
)
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
(11,156
|
)
|
|
|
(3,977
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(35,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(122,220
|
)
|
|
$
|
(205,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126,476
|
)
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$
|
26,847,829
|
|
|
$
|
33,381,495
|
|
|
$
|
28,734,936
|
|
|
$
|
35,555,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
124,010
|
|
|
$
|
128,170
|
|
|
$
|
372,480
|
|
|
$
|
378,967
|
|
Provision for loan loss
|
|
|
63,066
|
|
|
|
58,200
|
|
|
|
211,908
|
|
|
|
222,942
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
81,369
|
|
|
|
88,031
|
|
|
|
239,057
|
|
|
|
267,920
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
169,810
|
|
|
|
153,926
|
|
|
|
506,474
|
|
|
|
446,854
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(27,497
|
)
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
(106,845
|
)
|
|
|
(22,909
|
)
|
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(10,474
|
)
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
(40,489
|
)
|
|
|
(8,872
|
)
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(17,023
|
)
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
(66,356
|
)
|
|
|
(14,037
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(17,023
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,622
|
|
|
$
|
(65,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,153
|
)
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$
|
10,685,376
|
|
|
$
|
11,786,649
|
|
|
$
|
11,142,230
|
|
|
$
|
11,956,404
|
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
32
Note 11 Business Segment Information (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Capital Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
20,241
|
|
|
$
|
19,603
|
|
|
$
|
69,188
|
|
|
$
|
58,877
|
|
Provision for loan loss
|
|
|
54,196
|
|
|
|
38,451
|
|
|
|
89,309
|
|
|
|
72,004
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
130,876
|
|
|
|
89,414
|
|
|
|
520,536
|
|
|
|
327,808
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
86,555
|
|
|
|
76,215
|
|
|
|
334,057
|
|
|
|
268,057
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
|
|
(5,649
|
)
|
|
|
166,358
|
|
|
|
46,624
|
|
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
|
62,476
|
|
|
|
17,162
|
|
|
Income(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,526
|
|
|
|
(3,385
|
)
|
|
|
103,882
|
|
|
|
29,462
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
(2,600
|
)
|
|
|
(4,501
|
)
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
5,337
|
|
|
$
|
(4,881
|
)
|
|
$
|
101,282
|
|
|
$
|
24,961
|
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$
|
3,763,121
|
|
|
$
|
4,867,776
|
|
|
$
|
4,157,615
|
|
|
$
|
5,345,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Specialty Lending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
29,608
|
|
|
$
|
45,200
|
|
|
$
|
94,312
|
|
|
$
|
152,869
|
|
Provision for loan loss
|
|
|
79,530
|
|
|
|
240,471
|
|
|
|
444,460
|
|
|
|
497,953
|
|
Noninterest income/(loss)
|
|
|
6,121
|
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
(9,627
|
)
|
|
|
(9,924
|
)
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
28,189
|
|
|
|
26,043
|
|
|
|
101,091
|
|
|
|
82,066
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(71,990
|
)
|
|
|
(217,192
|
)
|
|
|
(460,866
|
)
|
|
|
(437,074
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(27,125
|
)
|
|
|
(81,838
|
)
|
|
|
(173,654
|
)
|
|
|
(164,689
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(44,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135,354
|
)
|
|
$
|
(287,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
(272,385
|
)
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$
|
6,028,911
|
|
|
$
|
8,292,693
|
|
|
$
|
6,577,679
|
|
|
$
|
8,839,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
7,817
|
|
|
$
|
25,423
|
|
|
$
|
29,612
|
|
|
$
|
93,825
|
|
Provision/(benefit) for loan loss
|
|
|
(11,792
|
)
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
60,775
|
|
|
|
112,323
|
|
|
|
201,209
|
|
|
|
464,048
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
48,128
|
|
|
|
90,485
|
|
|
|
159,164
|
|
|
|
389,655
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
32,256
|
|
|
|
44,383
|
|
|
|
72,334
|
|
|
|
161,117
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
12,154
|
|
|
|
16,723
|
|
|
|
27,255
|
|
|
|
60,709
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
20,102
|
|
|
$
|
27,660
|
|
|
$
|
45,079
|
|
|
$
|
100,408
|
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$
|
1,867,979
|
|
|
$
|
4,534,579
|
|
|
$
|
2,023,103
|
|
|
$
|
5,418,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
9,225
|
|
|
$
|
4,751
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
|
$
|
5,596
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
24,677
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
36,172
|
|
|
|
74,200
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
17,219
|
|
|
|
40,846
|
|
|
|
59,404
|
|
|
|
73,141
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
16,683
|
|
|
|
(33,912
|
)
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
|
|
6,655
|
|
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
6,237
|
|
|
|
(21,899
|
)
|
|
|
(12,422
|
)
|
|
|
(27,398
|
)
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,446
|
|
|
|
(12,013
|
)
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(9,011
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
(9,104
|
)
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
(12,267
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
$
|
33,693
|
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$
|
4,502,442
|
|
|
$
|
3,899,798
|
|
|
$
|
4,834,309
|
|
|
$
|
3,994,585
|
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
33
Note
12 - Preferred Stock and Other Capital
FHN Preferred Stock and Warrant
On November 14, 2008, FHN issued and sold 866,540 preferred shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series CPP (Capital Purchase Program), along with a Warrant to
purchase common stock. The issuance occurred in connection with, and is governed by, the Treasury
Capital Purchase Program administered by the U.S. Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program
(TARP). The Preferred Shares have an annual 5% cumulative preferred dividend rate, payable
quarterly. The dividend rate increases to 9% after five years. Dividends compound if they accrue
in arrears. Preferred Shares have a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share plus accrued
dividends. The Preferred Shares have no redemption date and are not subject to any sinking fund.
The Preferred Shares carry certain restrictions. The Preferred Shares have a senior rank and also
provide limitations on certain compensation arrangements of executive officers. Subsequent UST
regulations have expanded limitations on compensation agreements to include the twenty most highly
compensated employees. During the first three years following the issuance, FHN may not reinstate
a cash dividend on its common shares nor purchase equity shares without the approval of the U.S.
Treasury, subject to certain limited exceptions. FHN may not reinstate a cash dividend on its
common shares to the extent preferred dividends remain unpaid. Generally, the Preferred Shares
are non-voting. However, should FHN fail to pay six quarterly dividends, the holder may elect two
directors to FHNs Board of Directors until such dividends are paid. In connection with the
issuance of the Preferred Shares, a Warrant to purchase 12,743,235 common shares was issued with an
exercise price of $10.20 per share. The Warrant is immediately exercisable and expires in ten
years. The Warrant is subject to proportionate anti-dilution adjustment in the event of stock
dividends or splits, among other things. As a result of the stock dividends distributed year to
date as of October 1, 2009, the Warrant was adjusted to cover 13,748,944 common shares at a
purchase price of $9.45 per share.
The Preferred Shares and Warrant qualify as Tier 1 capital and are presented in permanent equity on
the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as of September 30, 2009, in the amounts of
$794.6 million and $83.9 million, respectively.
Subsidiary Preferred Stock
On September 14, 2000, FT Real Estate Securities Company, Inc. (FTRESC), an indirect subsidiary of
FHN, issued 50 shares of 9.50% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Class B (Class B Preferred Shares), with
a liquidation preference of $1.0 million per share. An aggregate total of 47 Class B Preferred
Shares have been sold privately to nonaffiliates. These securities qualify as Tier 2 capital and
are presented in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as Long-term debt. FTRESC is
a real estate investment trust (REIT) established for the purpose of acquiring, holding and
managing real estate mortgage assets. Dividends on the Class B Preferred Shares are cumulative and
are payable semi-annually.
The Class B Preferred Shares are mandatorily redeemable on March 31, 2031, and redeemable at the
discretion of FTRESC in the event that the Class B Preferred Shares cannot be accounted for as Tier
2 regulatory capital or there is more than an insubstantial risk that dividends paid with respect
to the Class B Preferred Shares will not be fully deductible for tax purposes. They are not subject
to any sinking fund and are not convertible into any other securities of FTRESC, FHN or any of its
subsidiaries. The shares are, however, automatically exchanged at the direction of the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency for preferred stock of FTBNA, having substantially the same terms
as the Class B Preferred Shares in the event FTBNA becomes undercapitalized, insolvent or in danger
of becoming undercapitalized.
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic relating to
Consolidation (ASC 810-10-45) which provides that noncontrolling interests should be presented as a
separate component of equity rather than on a mezzanine level. In accordance with ASC 810-10-45,
the balance for noncontrolling interests associated with preferred stock previously issued by the
following indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of FHN has been included in the equity section of the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition for all periods presented.
First Horizon Preferred Funding, LLC and First Horizon Preferred Funding II, LLC have each issued
$1.0 million of Class B Units of preferred stock. On September 30, 2009 and 2008, the amount of
Class B Preferred Shares and Units that are perpetual in nature that was recognized as
Noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition was $.3 million and
$.5 million, respectively. The remaining balance has been eliminated in consolidation. Prior to
the adoption of ASC 810-10-45, the balance for these preferred shares was recognized as Preferred
stock of subsidiary on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition.
On March 23, 2005, FTBNA issued 300,000 shares of Class A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock
(Class A Preferred Stock) with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. These securities
qualify as Tier 1 capital. On September 30, 2009 and 2008, $294.8 million of Class A Preferred
Stock was recognized as Noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition. Prior to the adoption of ASC 810-10-45, the balance of FTBNAs Class A Preferred Stock
was recognized as Preferred stock of subsidiary on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition.
34
Note
12 - Preferred Stock and Other Capital (continued)
Due to the nature of the subsidiary preferred stock issued by First Horizon Preferred Funding, LLC,
First Horizon Preferred Funding II, LLC, and FTBNA, all components of other comprehensive
income/(loss) included in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Equity have been attributed
solely to FHN as the controlling interest holder. The table below presents the amounts included in
the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 which are attributable to FHN as controlling interest holder for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(27,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(202,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(132,279
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(10,200
|
)
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
(11,156
|
)
|
|
|
(3,977
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(37,983
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
(214,154
|
)
|
|
$
|
(136,256
|
)
|
|
35
Note
13 - Loan Sales and Securitizations
Historically, FHN utilized loan sales and securitizations as a significant source of liquidity for
its mortgage banking operations. With FHNs current focus on origination of mortgages within its
regional banking footprint and the related sale of national mortgage origination offices to
MetLife, loan sale and securitization activity has significantly decreased. Subsequent to the
MetLife transaction, FHN generally no longer retains financial interests in loans it transfers to
third parties. For classification purposes, all loans transferred to GSE (e.g., FNMA, FHLMC, and
GNMA), including those subsequently securitized by an agency, are considered loan sales while
transfers attributed to securitizations consist solely of proprietary securitizations executed by
FHN.
During third quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN transferred $.3 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively, of
single-family residential mortgage loans in sales that were not securitizations. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, FHN transferred $1.1 billion and $19.3 billion,
respectively, of single-family residential mortgage loans in sales that were not securitizations.
In 2008, the transactions primarily reflect sales to GSE. In third quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN
recognized net pre-tax gains of $1.7 million and $19.9 million from the sale of single-family
residential mortgage loans which includes gains recognized on the capitalization of MSR associated
with these loans. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, FHN recognized net
pre-tax gains of $13.0 million and $236.4 million, respectively, from the sale of single-family
residential mortgage loans which include gains recognized on the capitalization of MSR associated
with these loans.
During third quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN transferred $3.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively, of
HELOC related to proprietary securitization transactions. During the nine months ended September
30, 2009, and 2008, FHN has transferred $10.4 million and $15.3 million, respectively, of HELOC
related to proprietary securitization transactions. In third quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN recognized
net pre-tax gains $.1 million related to HELOC securitizations which include gains recognized on
the capitalization of MSR associated with these loans. During the nine months ended September 30,
2009, and 2008, FHN has recognized net pre-tax gains of $.2 million and $.3 million, respectively,
related to HELOC securitizations which include gains recognized on the capitalization of MSR
associated with these loans.
Retained Interests
Interests retained from loan sales, including GSE securitizations, include MSR and excess interest.
Interests retained from proprietary securitizations include MSR and various financial assets (see
discussion below). MSR are initially valued at fair value, and the remaining retained interests
are initially valued by allocating the remaining cost basis of the loan between the security or
loan sold and the remaining retained interests based on their relative fair values at the time of
sale or securitization.
In certain cases, FHN continues to service and receive servicing fees related to the transferred
loans. Generally, FHN received annual servicing fees approximating .28 percent in third quarter
2009 and .27 percent in third quarter 2008 of the outstanding balance of underlying single-family
residential mortgage loans. FHN received annual servicing fees approximating .50 percent in third
quarter 2009 and 2008 of the outstanding balance of underlying loans for HELOC and home equity
loans transferred. MSR related to loans transferred and serviced by FHN, as well as MSR related to
loans serviced by FHN and transferred by others, are discussed further in Note 5 Mortgage
Servicing Rights. During third quarter 2009, there were no significant additions to MSR.
Other financial assets retained in a proprietary or GSE securitization may include certificated
residual interests, excess interest (structured as interest-only strips), interest-only strips,
principal-only strips, or subordinated bonds. Residual interests represent rights to receive
earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the underlying loans. Excess interest
represents rights to receive interest from serviced assets that exceed contractually specified
rates. Principal-only strips are principal cash flow tranches, and interest-only strips are
interest cash flow tranches. Subordinated bonds are bonds with junior priority. All financial
assets retained from a securitization are recognized on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition in trading securities at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses
included in current earnings as a component of noninterest income on the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Income.
As of September 30, 2009, and 2008, $52.2 million and $112.3 million, respectively, of excess
interest IO are associated with proprietary securitization transactions while the remainder is
associated with loan sales. All other retained interests relate to securitization activity.
36
Note
13 - Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
The sensitivity of the fair value of all retained or purchased MSR to immediate 10 percent and 20
percent adverse changes in assumptions on September 30, 2009, and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2009
|
|
On September 30, 2008
|
(Dollars in thousands
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
except for annual cost to service)
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests
|
|
$
|
281,046
|
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
$
|
6,387
|
|
|
$
|
770,621
|
|
|
$
|
17,527
|
|
|
$
|
10,343
|
|
Weighted average life (in years)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate
|
|
|
21.5%
|
|
|
|
43.4%
|
|
|
|
31.0%
|
|
|
|
16.9%
|
|
|
|
34.7%
|
|
|
|
35.0%
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
(16,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
(313
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(705
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(32,112
|
)
|
|
|
(2,060
|
)
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
(60,398
|
)
|
|
|
(2,501
|
)
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual discount rate on servicing cash flows
|
|
|
12.8%
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
|
|
18.0%
|
|
|
|
10.4%
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
|
|
18.0%
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
(7,470
|
)
|
|
$
|
(202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
(436
|
)
|
|
$
|
(301
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(14,505
|
)
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
(32,520
|
)
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual cost to service (per loan)
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
|
(6,544
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(7,549
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(13,054
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(15,098
|
)
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual earnings on escrow
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
|
|
3.6%
|
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
2.1%
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
(4,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(308
|
)
|
|
$
|
(174
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(8,916
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(44,635
|
)
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
37
Note
13 - Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
The sensitivity of the fair value of other retained interests to immediate 10 percent and 20
percent adverse changes in assumptions on September 30, 2009, and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual
|
|
|
Residual
|
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
(Dollars in thousands
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Certificated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
except for annual cost to service)
|
|
IO
|
|
|
PO
|
|
|
IO
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
2nd Liens
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests
|
|
$
|
92,210
|
|
|
$
|
12,142
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
1,405
|
|
|
$
|
2,488
|
|
|
$
|
2,462
|
|
Weighted average life (in years)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate
|
|
|
21.0%
|
|
|
|
33.2%
|
|
|
|
10.2%
|
|
|
|
6.3%
|
|
|
|
26.3%
|
|
|
|
28.2%
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
(4,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
(366
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(9,381
|
)
|
|
|
(730
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual discount rate on residual cash flows
|
|
|
10.8%
|
|
|
|
22.6%
|
|
|
|
34.7%
|
|
|
|
142.5%
|
|
|
|
34.9%
|
|
|
|
32.9%
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
(3,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(535
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
(305
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(7,154
|
)
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests
|
|
$
|
251,305
|
|
|
$
|
14,335
|
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
12,511
|
|
|
$
|
3,711
|
|
|
$
|
3,713
|
|
Weighted average life (in years)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate
|
|
|
14.3%
|
|
|
|
23.1%
|
|
|
|
15.3%
|
|
|
|
14.3%
|
|
|
|
30.0%
|
|
|
|
28.0%
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
(12,649
|
)
|
|
$
|
(566
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(519
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(24,290
|
)
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual discount rate on residual cash flows
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
16.3%
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
33.5%
|
|
|
|
35.0%
|
|
|
|
33.0%
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
(9,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(490
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(403
|
)
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
|
|
|
(18,418
|
)
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future
performance. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in
assumptions cannot necessarily be extrapolated because the relationship between the change in
assumption and the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect on the
fair value of the retained interest caused by a particular assumption variation is calculated
independently from all other assumption changes. In reality, changes in one factor may result in
changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Furthermore, the estimated
fair values as disclosed should not be considered indicative of future earnings on these assets.
FHN uses assumptions and estimates in determining the fair value allocated to retained interests at
the time of initial securitization. Subsequent to the MetLife sale, FHN generally no longer retains
interests related to loan sales or securitizations. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, additions to MSR were immaterial. The key economic assumptions used to measure
the fair value of MSR at the date of securitization or loan sale were as follows during the third
quarter 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average life (in years)
|
|
|
4.1-6.3
|
|
|
|
2.7 - 3.1
|
|
|
|
1.7 - 1.8
|
|
Annual prepayment rate
|
|
|
13.4% - 21.4%
|
|
|
|
26.0% - 30.0%
|
|
|
|
43.0% - 44.0%
|
|
Annual discount rate
|
|
|
9.8%-11.0%
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
|
|
18.0%
|
|
Annual cost to service (per loan)
|
|
|
$56 - $66
|
|
|
|
$50
|
|
|
|
$50
|
|
Annual earnings on escrow
|
|
|
3.5%-3.7%
|
|
|
|
3.8% - 5.3%
|
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
|
38
Note
13 - Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
There were no securitizations in which FHN retained an interest during the three or nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The key economic assumptions used to measure the fair value of other
retained interests at the date of securitization were as follows during third quarter 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Certificated
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
IO
|
|
|
PO
|
|
|
Bond
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average life (in years)
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Annual prepayment rate
|
|
|
12.4%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Annual discount rate
|
|
|
11.8%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Cash flows received and paid related to loan sales were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial sales
|
|
$
|
256,758
|
|
|
$
|
4,956,106
|
|
|
$
|
1,102,402
|
|
|
$
|
19,505,914
|
|
Servicing fees retained*
|
|
|
16,891
|
|
|
|
32,970
|
|
|
|
53,046
|
|
|
|
135,837
|
|
Purchases of GNMA guaranteed mortgages
|
|
|
6,121
|
|
|
|
42,208
|
|
|
|
7,880
|
|
|
|
103,436
|
|
Purchases of delinquent or foreclosed assets
|
|
|
13,562
|
|
|
|
9,559
|
|
|
|
49,351
|
|
|
|
23,507
|
|
Other cash flows received on retained interests
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
4,042
|
|
|
|
25,252
|
|
|
|
28,271
|
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with
current presentation.
*
|
|
Includes servicing fees on MSR associated with loan sales and purchased MSR.
|
Cash flows received and paid related to securitizations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial securitizations
|
|
|
$3,987
|
|
|
|
$4,462
|
|
|
|
$10,671
|
|
|
|
$15,574
|
|
Servicing fees retained
|
|
|
16,230
|
|
|
|
21,132
|
|
|
|
50,383
|
|
|
|
65,005
|
|
Purchases of delinquent or foreclosed assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
Other cash flows received on retained interests
|
|
|
4,268
|
|
|
|
3,919
|
|
|
|
34,881
|
|
|
|
14,967
|
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
39
Note
13 - Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
As of September 30, 2009, the principal amount of loans transferred through loan sales and
securitizations and other loans managed with them, the principal amount of delinquent loans, and
the net credit losses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Principal
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Net Credit
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount of Loans
|
|
of Delinquent Loans (a)
|
|
Losses (b) (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
On September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of loan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential
|
|
$
|
32,298,124
|
|
|
$
|
835,913
|
|
|
$
|
131,006
|
|
|
$
|
303,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans managed or transferred (d)
|
|
$
|
32,298,124
|
|
|
$
|
835,913
|
|
|
$
|
131,006
|
|
|
$
|
303,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold (e)
|
|
|
(23,668,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale (e)
|
|
|
(369,296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held in portfolio
|
|
$
|
8,260,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Loans 90 days or more past due include $.2 million of GNMA guaranteed
mortgages. $614.0 million of delinquent loans have been securitized while $32.3 million have been sold.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Principal amount of loans securitized and sold includes $19.5 billion of loans securitized
through GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC. FHN retains interests other than servicing rights on a portion
of these securitized loans. No delinquency or net credit loss data is included for the loans
securitized through FNMA or FHMLC because these agencies retain credit risk. The
remainder of loans securitized and sold were securitized through proprietary trusts,
where FHN retained interests other than servicing rights.
|
|
(c)
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, $46.3 million associated with securitizations
and $12.4 million associated with loan sales;
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, $67.2 million associated with securitizations and
$29.4 million associated with loan sales.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Transferred loans are real estate residential loans in which FHN has a retained interest other
than servicing rights.
|
|
(e)
|
|
$4.2 billion associated with securitizations and $19.8 billion associated with loan sales.
|
40
Note
13 - Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
As of September 30, 2008, the principal amount of loans transferred through loan sales and
securitizations and other loans managed with them, the principal amount of delinquent loans, and
the net credit losses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Principal
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Net Credit
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount of Loans
|
|
of Delinquent Loans (a)
|
|
Losses (b) (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
On September 30, 2008
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of loan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential
|
|
$
|
73,657,580
|
|
|
$
|
400,301
|
|
|
$
|
53,151
|
|
|
$
|
129,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans managed or transferred (d)
|
|
$
|
73,657,580
|
|
|
$
|
400,301
|
|
|
$
|
53,151
|
|
|
$
|
129,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold (e)
|
|
|
(64,206,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale (e)
|
|
|
(540,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held in portfolio
|
|
$
|
8,910,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Loans 90 days or more past due include $.2 million of GNMA guaranteed
mortgages. $311.0 million of delinquent loans have been securitized while $9.1 million have
been sold.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Principal amount of loans securitized and sold includes $59.2 billion of loans securitized
through GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC. FHN retains interests other than servicing rights on a portion
of these securitized loans. No delinquency or net credit loss data is included for the loans
securitized through FNMA or FHMLC because these agencies retain credit risk. The
remainder of loans securitized and sold were securitized through proprietary trusts,
where FHN retained interests other than servicing rights.
|
|
(c)
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, $7.3 million associated with securitizations
and $18.6 million associated with loan sales;
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, $16.0 million associated with securitizations and
$28.2 million associated with loan sales.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Transferred loans are real estate residential loans in which FHN has a retained interest other
than servicing rights.
|
|
(e)
|
|
$5.0 billion associated with securitizations and $59.7 billion associated with loan sales.
|
Secured Borrowings.
In 2007 and 2006, FTBNA executed several securitizations of retail real estate
residential loans for the purpose of engaging in secondary market financing. Since the related
trusts did not qualify as QSPE and since the cash flows on the loans are pledged to the holders of
the trusts securities, FTBNA recognized the proceeds as secured borrowings in accordance with the
ASCs Transfers and Servicing Topic (ASC 860-10-50). As of September 30, 2009, FTBNA had
recognized $669.5 million of loans net of unearned income and $661.3 million of other
collateralized borrowings in its Consolidated Condensed Statement of Condition related to these
transactions. As of September 30, 2008, FTBNA had recognized $717.2 million of loans net of
unearned income and $701.2 million of other collateralized borrowings in its Consolidated Condensed
Statement of Condition related to these transactions. See Note 14 Variable Interest Entities for
additional information.
41
Note
14 - Variable Interest Entities
Under the provisions of ASCs Consolidation Topic (ASC 860-10-50), FHN is deemed to be the primary
beneficiary and required to consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE) if it has a variable
interest that will absorb the majority of the VIEs expected losses, receive the majority of
expected residual returns, or both. A VIE exists when equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for
the entity to finance its activities by itself. A variable interest is a contractual, ownership,
or other interest that changes with changes in the fair value of the VIEs net assets or the VIEs
cash flows. Expected losses and expected residual returns are measures of variability in the
expected fair value or cash flow of a VIE.
Consolidated Variable Interest Entities.
In 2007 and 2006, FTBNA established several Delaware
statutory trusts (Trusts), for the purpose of engaging in secondary market financing. Except for
recourse due to breaches of standard representations and warranties made by FTBNA in connection
with the sale of the retail real estate residential loans by FTBNA to the Trusts, the creditors of
the Trusts hold no recourse to the assets of FTBNA. Additionally, FTBNA has no contractual
requirements to provide financial support to the Trusts. Since the Trusts did not qualify as QSPE,
FTBNA treated the proceeds as secured borrowings in accordance with ASC 860-10-50. FTBNA
determined that the Trusts were VIEs because the holders of the equity investment at risk did not
have adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. Thus, FTBNA assessed whether it
was the primary beneficiary of the associated trusts. Since there was an overcollateralization of
the Trusts, any excess of cash flows received on the transferred loans above the amounts passed
through to the security holders would revert to FTBNA. Accordingly, FTBNA determined that it was
the primary beneficiary of the Trusts because it absorbed a majority of the expected losses of the
Trusts.
FTBNA holds variable interests in trusts which have issued mandatorily redeemable preferred capital
securities (trust preferreds) for smaller banking and insurance enterprises. FTBNA has no voting
rights for the trusts activities. The trusts only assets are junior subordinated debentures of
the issuing enterprises. The creditors of the trusts hold no recourse to the assets of FTBNA.
These trusts meet the definition of a VIE because the holders of the equity investment at risk do
not have adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. In situations where FTBNA
holds a majority of the trust preferreds issued by a trust, it is considered the primary
beneficiary of that trust because FTBNA will absorb a majority of the trusts expected losses.
FTBNA has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts. In situations
where FTBNA holds a majority, but less than all, of the trust preferreds for a trust, consolidation
of the trust results in recognition of amounts received from other parties as debt.
FHN has established certain rabbi trusts related to deferred compensation plans offered to its
employees. FHN contributes employee cash compensation deferrals to the trusts and directs the
underlying investments made by the trusts. The assets of these trusts are available to FHNs
creditors only in the event that FHN becomes insolvent. These trusts are considered VIEs because
either there is no equity at risk in the trusts or because FHN provided the equity interest to its
employees in exchange for services rendered. Given that the trusts were created in exchange for
the employees services, FHN is considered the primary beneficiary of the rabbi trusts because it
is most closely related to their purpose and design. FHN has the obligation to fund any
liabilities to employees that are in excess of a rabbi trusts assets.
The following table summarizes VIEs consolidated by FHN:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
On balance sheet consumer loan securitizations
|
|
$
|
669,503
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
$
|
661,291
|
|
|
Other collateralized borrowings
|
Small issuer trust preferred holdings
|
|
|
452,850
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
30,500
|
|
|
Term borrowings
|
Rabbi trusts used for deferred compensation plans
|
|
|
94,830
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
57,099
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
On balance sheet consumer loan securitizations
|
|
$
|
717,192
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
$
|
701,150
|
|
|
Other collateralized borrowings
|
Small issuer trust preferred holdings
|
|
|
465,350
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
30,500
|
|
|
Term borrowings
|
Rabbi trusts used for deferred compensation plans
|
|
|
143,269
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
88,226
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities.
Since 1997, First Tennessee Housing Corporation
(FTHC), a wholly-owned subsidiary, makes equity investments as a limited partner, in various
partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit
(LIHTC) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to
achieve a satisfactory return on capital and to support FHNs community reinvestment initiatives.
The activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation
of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants generally within FHNs
primary geographic region. LIHTC partnerships are considered VIEs because FTHC, as the holder of
the equity investment at risk, does not have the ability to significantly affect the success of the
entity through voting rights. FTHC is not considered the primary beneficiary of the LIHTC
partnerships because an agent relationship exists between FTHC and the general partners, whereby
the general partners cannot sell, transfer or otherwise encumber their ownership interest without
42
Note
14 - Variable Interest Entities (continued)
the approval of FTHC. Because this results in a de facto agent relationship between the partners,
the general partners are considered the primary beneficiaries because their operations are most
closely associated with the LIHTC partnerships operations. FTHC has no contractual requirements
to provide financial support to the LIHTC partnerships beyond its initial funding commitments.
FTBNA holds variable interests in trusts which have issued mandatorily redeemable trust preferreds
for smaller banking and insurance enterprises. FTBNA has no voting rights for the trusts
activities. The trusts only assets are junior subordinated debentures of the issuing enterprises.
These trusts meet the definition of a VIE because the holders of the equity investment at risk do
not have adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. In situations where FTBNA
did not hold a majority of the trust preferreds issued by a trust, it is not considered the primary
beneficiary of that trust because FTBNA does not absorb a majority of the expected losses of the
trust. FTBNA has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts.
In third quarter 2007, FTBNA executed a securitization of certain small issuer trust preferreds for
which the underlying trust did not qualify as a QSPE under ASC 860-10-50. This trust was
determined to be a VIE because the holders of the equity investment at risk do not have adequate
decision making ability over the trusts activities. FTBNA determined that it was not the primary
beneficiary of the trust due to the size and priority of the interests it retained in the
securities issued by the trust. Accordingly, FTBNA has accounted for the funds received through
the securitization as a collateralized borrowing in its Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Condition. FTBNA has no contractual requirement to provide financial support to the trust.
In 1996 FHN issued junior subordinated debt to Capital I and Capital II totaling $309.0 million.
Both Capital I and Capital II are considered VIEs because FHNs capital contributions to these
trusts are not considered at risk in evaluating whether the equity investments at risk in the
trusts have adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. Capital I and Capital II
are not consolidated by FHN because the holders of the securities issued by the trusts absorb a
majority of expected losses and residual returns.
Prior to September 30, 2009, wholly-owned subsidiaries of FHN served as investment advisor and
administrator of certain fund of funds investment vehicles, whereby the subsidiaries received
fees for management of the funds operations and through revenue sharing agreements based on the
funds performance. The funds were considered VIEs because the holders of the equity at risk did
not have voting rights or the ability to control the funds operations. The subsidiaries did not
make any investment in the funds. Further, the subsidiaries were not obligated to provide any
financial support to the funds. The funds were not consolidated by FHN because its subsidiaries
did not absorb a majority of expected losses or residual returns.
The following table summarizes VIEs that are not consolidated by FHN:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Loss Exposure
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
Low Income Housing Partnerships (a) (b)
|
|
$
|
115,321
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Other assets
|
Small Issuer Trust Preferred Holdings
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
On Balance Sheet Trust Preferred Securitization
|
|
|
64,377
|
|
|
|
49,797
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Proprietary Trust Preferred Issuances
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
309,000
|
|
|
Term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Maximum loss exposure represents $112.5 million of current investments and $2.8 million of contractual funding commitments.
Only the current investment amount is included in Other Assets.
|
|
(b)
|
|
A liability is not recognized because investments are written down over the life of the related tax credit.
|
|
(c)
|
|
$112.5 million was classified as Loans, net of unearned income and $1.7 million was classified as Trading securities which are offset by
$49.8 million classified as Other collateralized borrowings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Loss Exposure
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
Low Income Housing Partnerships (a) (b)
|
|
$
|
138,776
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Other assets
|
Small Issuer Trust Preferred Holdings
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
On Balance Sheet Trust Preferred Securitization
|
|
|
65,528
|
|
|
|
48,646
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Proprietary Trust Preferred Issuances
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
309,000
|
|
|
Term borrowings
|
Management of Fund of Funds
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Maximum loss exposure represents $120.0 million of current investments and $18.8 million of contractual funding commitments.
Only the current investment amount is included in Other Assets.
|
|
(b)
|
|
A liability is not recognized because investments are written down over the life of the related tax credit.
|
|
(c)
|
|
$112.5 million was classified as Loans, net of unearned income and $1.7 million was classified as Trading securities which are offset by $48.6 million
classified as Other collateralized borrowings.
|
43
Note 15 Derivatives
In the normal course of business, FHN utilizes various financial instruments (including derivative
contracts and credit-related agreements) through its mortgage banking, capital markets, and risk
management operations, as part of its risk management strategy and as a means to meet customers
needs. These instruments are subject to credit and market risks in excess of the amount recorded
on the balance sheet required by GAAP. The contractual or notional amounts of these financial
instruments do not necessarily represent credit or market risk. However, they can be used to
measure the extent of involvement in various types of financial instruments. Controls and
monitoring procedures for these instruments have been established and are routinely reevaluated.
The Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) monitors the usage and effectiveness of these financial
instruments.
Credit risk represents the potential loss that may occur because a party to a transaction fails to
perform according to the terms of the contract. The measure of credit exposure is the replacement
cost of contracts with a positive fair value. FHN manages credit risk by entering into financial
instrument transactions through national exchanges, primary dealers or approved counterparties, and
using mutual margining and master netting agreements whenever possible to limit potential exposure.
FHN also maintains collateral posting requirements with its counterparties to limit credit risk.
With exchange-traded contracts, the credit risk is limited to the clearinghouse used. For
non-exchange traded instruments, credit risk may occur when there is a gain in the fair value of
the financial instrument and the counterparty fails to perform according to the terms of the
contract and/or when the collateral proves to be of insufficient value. Market risk represents the
potential loss due to the decrease in the value of a financial instrument caused primarily by
changes in interest rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, or the prices of debt instruments. FHN
manages market risk by establishing and monitoring limits on the types and degree of risk that may
be undertaken. FHN continually measures this risk through the use of models that measure
value-at-risk and earnings-at-risk.
Derivative Instruments.
FHN enters into various derivative contracts both in a dealer capacity, to
facilitate customer transactions, and also as a risk management tool. Where contracts have been
created for customers, FHN enters into transactions with dealers to offset its risk exposure.
Derivatives are also used as a risk management tool to hedge FHNs exposure to changes in interest
rates or other defined market risks.
Derivative instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as other
assets or other liabilities measured at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would
be received to sell a derivative asset or paid to transfer a derivative liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the transaction date. Fair value is determined using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. For a fair value hedge,
changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged
asset or liability are recognized currently in earnings. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the
fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent that it is effective, are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to earnings as the hedged
transaction impacts net income. Any ineffective portion of a cash flow hedge is recognized
currently in earnings. For freestanding derivative instruments, changes in fair value are
recognized currently in earnings. Cash flows from derivative contracts are reported as operating
activities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows.
Interest rate forward contracts are over-the-counter contracts where two parties agree to purchase
and sell a specific quantity of a financial instrument at a specified price, with delivery or
settlement at a specified date. Futures contracts are exchange-traded contracts where two parties
agree to purchase and sell a specific quantity of a financial instrument at a specified price, with
delivery or settlement at a specified date. Interest rate option contracts give the purchaser the
right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a specified quantity of a financial instrument, at a
specified price, during a specified period of time. Caps and floors are options that are linked to
a notional principal amount and an underlying indexed interest rate. Interest rate swaps involve
the exchange of interest payments at specified intervals between two parties without the exchange
of any underlying principal. Swaptions are options on interest rate swaps that give the purchaser
the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap agreement during a specified
period of time.
On September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, FHN had approximately $125.8 million and $32.2
million of cash receivables and $106.5 million and $59.0 million of cash payables related to
collateral posting under master netting arrangements with derivative counterparties. Certain of
FHNs agreements with derivative counterparties contain provisions that require that FTBNAs debt
maintain minimum credit ratings from specified credit rating agencies. If FTBNAs debt were to fall
below these minimums, these provisions would be triggered, and the counterparties could terminate
the agreements and request immediate settlement of all derivative contracts under the agreements.
The net fair value, determined by individual counterparty, of all derivative instruments with
credit-risk-related contingent accelerated termination provisions were $20.2 million of assets and
$14.1 million of liabilities on September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, FHN had received
collateral of $14.6 million posted collateral of $12.6 million in the normal course of business
related to these contracts.
44
Note
15 Derivatives (continued)
Additionally, certain of FHNs derivative agreements contain provisions whereby the collateral
posting thresholds under the agreements adjust based on the credit ratings of both counterparties.
If the credit rating of FHN and/or FTBNA is lowered, FHN would be required to post additional
collateral with the counterparties. The net fair value, determined by individual counterparty, of
all derivative instruments with adjustable collateral posting thresholds were $154.9 million of
assets and $100.3 million of liabilities on September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, FHN had
received collateral of $117.5 million and posted collateral of $96.7 million in the normal course
of business related to these agreements.
Mortgage Banking
Retained Interests
FHN revalues MSR to current fair value each month with changes in fair value included in servicing
income in mortgage banking noninterest income. FHN hedges the MSR to minimize the effects of loss
in value of MSR associated with increased prepayment activity that generally results from declining
interest rates. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of the MSR generally will
increase while the value of the hedge instruments will decline. FHN enters into interest rate
contracts (potentially including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) to hedge
against the effects of changes in fair value of its MSR. Substantially all capitalized MSR are
hedged for economic purposes.
FHN utilizes derivatives as an economic hedge (potentially including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage
forward sales contracts) to protect the value of its interest-only securities that change in value
inversely to the movement of interest rates. Interest-only securities are included in trading
securities. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives and the hedged interest-only securities
are recognized currently in earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of
servicing income.
Mortgage Warehouse and Pipeline
As a result of the MetLife transaction, mortgage banking origination activity was significantly
reduced in the periods after third quarter 2008 as FHN focuses on origination within its regional
banking footprint. Accordingly, the following discussion of warehouse and pipeline related
derivatives is primarily applicable to reporting periods occurring through the third quarter 2008.
During 2009, FHN attempted economic hedging for only a small portion of the warehouse loans and
pipeline. Additionally, the fair value of interest rate lock commitments was immaterial as of
September 30, 2009.
FHNs warehouse (mortgage loans held for sale) is subject to changes in fair value due to
fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into
the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest
rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, FHN enters
into forward sales and futures contracts to provide an economic hedge against those changes in fair
value on a significant portion of the warehouse. These derivatives are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of the gain or loss on the sale
of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income. Upon adoption of the Financial Instruments Topic
(ASC 825-10-50), FHN elected to prospectively account for substantially all of its mortgage loan
warehouse products at fair value upon origination and correspondingly discontinued the application
of ASC 815-10-45 hedging relationships for all subsequent originations.
Mortgage banking interest rate lock commitments are short-term commitments to fund mortgage loan
applications in process (the pipeline) for a fixed term at a fixed price. During the term of an
interest rate lock commitment, FHN has the risk that interest rates will change from the rate
quoted to the borrower. FHN enters into forward sales contracts with respect to fixed rate loan
commitments and futures contracts with respect to adjustable rate loan commitments as economic
hedges designed to protect the value of the interest rate lock commitments from changes in value
due to changes in interest rates. Interest rate lock commitments qualify as derivative financial
instruments and as such do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. As a result, the interest
rate lock commitments were recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current
earnings as gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income. Changes in
the fair value of the derivatives that serve as economic hedges of interest rate lock commitments
are also included in current earnings as a component of gain or loss on the sale of loans in
mortgage banking noninterest income.
45
Note 15 Derivatives (continued)
The following table summarizes FHNs derivatives associated with Mortgage Banking activities
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Description
|
|
Notional
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
Retained Interests Hedging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forwards and Futures (a) (b)
|
|
$
|
2,220,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,130
|
|
|
$
|
979
|
|
|
$
|
24,848
|
|
|
$
|
21,024
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps and Swaptions (a) (b)
|
|
$
|
2,215,000
|
|
|
$
|
42,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
$
|
38,567
|
|
|
$
|
25,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights (c) (b)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
281,235
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(30,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,828
|
|
Other Retained Interests (d) (b)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
108,579
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(1,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,320
|
|
|
Pipeline and Warehouse Hedging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forwards and Futures (b)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Warehouse (e) (b)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
272,248
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
|
|
$
|
(5,845
|
) (g)
|
Mortgage Pipeline (b)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(f
|
)
|
|
|
(f
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(233
|
) (g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Assets included in the other assets section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition. Liabilities included in the other liabilities section of the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Condition.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Gains/Losses included in the mortgage banking income section of the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Income.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Assets included in the mortgage servicing rights section of the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Condition.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Assets included in the trading securities section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Assets included in the loans held for sale section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Due to the reduction of mortgage banking origination operations after the MetLife transaction,
the fair value of interest rate lock commitments was immaterial as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
(g)
|
|
Economic hedging is attempted for only a small portion of warehouse loans and pipeline.
|
Capital Markets
Capital Markets trades U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, mortgage-backed, corporate and municipal fixed
income securities, and other securities principally for distribution to customers. When these
securities settle on a delayed basis, they are considered forward contracts. Capital Markets also
enters into interest rate contracts, including options, caps, swaps, and floors for its customers.
In addition, Capital Markets enters into futures contracts to economically hedge interest rate risk
associated with a portion of its securities inventory. These transactions are measured at fair
value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in capital markets noninterest income.
Related assets and liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet as other assets and other
liabilities. Credit risk related to these transactions is controlled through credit approvals,
risk control limits, and ongoing monitoring procedures through the Credit Risk Management
Committee. Total trading revenues related to fixed income sales, which constitutes substantially
all of FHNs trading activities, were $120.5 million and $487.6 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, inclusive of both derivative and non-derivative financial
instruments. Trading revenues are included in capital markets noninterest income.
46
Note 15 Derivatives (continued)
The following table summarizes FHNs derivatives associated with Capital Markets trading
activities as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Notional
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
Customer Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
$
|
1,601,966
|
|
|
$
|
50,512
|
|
|
$
|
10,233
|
|
Offsetting Upstream Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
$
|
1,601,966
|
|
|
$
|
10,236
|
|
|
$
|
50,518
|
|
Forwards and Futures Purchased
|
|
$
|
8,407,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,049
|
|
|
$
|
22,603
|
|
Forwards and Futures Sold
|
|
$
|
8,500,599
|
|
|
$
|
21,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,543
|
|
|
Capital Markets hedges held-to-maturity trust preferred loans with a principal balance of $233.1
and $244.6 million as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which have an initial fixed
rate term of five years before conversion to a floating rate. Capital Markets has entered into pay
fixed, receive floating interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk associated with this
initial five year term. These hedge relationships qualify as fair value hedges under ASC
815-10-45. The balance sheet impact of those swaps was $21.5 million and $9.3 million in other
liabilities on September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest paid or received for these
swaps was recognized as an adjustment of the interest income of the assets whose risk is being
hedged. The following table summarizes FHNs derivative activities associated with these loans for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Description
|
|
Notional
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
Loan Portfolio Hedging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
233,083
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
21,499
|
|
|
$
|
(2,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Loans (a) (b)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
233,083
|
(c)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
2,166
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
(4,479
|
) (b)
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Assets included in loans, net of unearned section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents gains and losses attributable to changes in fair value due to interest rate risk as designated in ASC 815-10-45 hedging relationships.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents principal balance being hedged.
|
Interest Rate Risk Management
FHNs ALCO focuses on managing market risk by controlling and limiting earnings volatility
attributable to changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk exists to the extent that
interest-earning assets and liabilities have different maturity or repricing characteristics. FHN
uses derivatives, including swaps, caps, options, and collars, that are designed to moderate the
impact on earnings as interest rates change.
FHNs interest rate risk management policy is to use derivatives to hedge interest rate risk or
market value of assets or liabilities, not to speculate. In addition, FHN has entered into certain
interest rate swaps and caps as a part of a product offering to commercial customers with customer
derivatives paired with offsetting market instruments that, when completed, are designed to
mitigate market risk. These contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and are measured at fair
value with gains or losses included in current earnings in noninterest expense.
FHN has entered into pay floating, receive fixed interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate
risk of certain long-term debt obligations, totaling $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion on September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. These swaps have been accounted for as fair value hedges under the
shortcut method. The balance sheet impact of these swaps was $107.2 million and $38.7 million in
other assets on September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest paid or received for these
swaps was recognized as an adjustment of the interest expense of the liabilities whose risk is
being managed.
FHN designates derivative transactions in hedging strategies to manage interest rate risk on
subordinated debt related to its trust preferred securities. These qualify for hedge accounting
under ASC 815-10-45 using the long haul method. FHN entered into pay floating, receive fixed
interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk of certain subordinated debt totaling $.2
billion on September 30, 2009, and $.3 billion on September 30, 2008. The balance sheet impact of
these swaps was $2.6 million and $13.6 million in other liabilities on September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. There was no ineffectiveness related to these hedges. Interest paid or received for
these swaps was
47
Note 15 Derivatives (continued)
recognized as an adjustment of the interest expense of the liabilities whose risk is being
managed. In first quarter 2009, FHNs counterparty called the swap associated with $.1 billion of
subordinated debt. Accordingly, hedge accounting was discontinued on the date of settlement and
the cumulative basis adjustments to the associated subordinated debt are being prospectively
amortized as an adjustment to yield over its remaining term.
The following table summarizes FHNs derivatives associated with interest rate risk management
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Description
|
|
Notional
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
Customer Interest Rate Contracts Hedging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments and Hedged Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Interest Rate Contracts (a)
|
|
$
|
1,187,275
|
|
|
$
|
82,338
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
3,151
|
|
|
$
|
(41,118
|
)
|
Offsetting Upstream Interest Rate
Contracts (a)
|
|
$
|
1,187,275
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
85,538
|
|
|
$
|
(8,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Hedging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (b)
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
107,192
|
|
|
$
|
2,604
|
|
|
$
|
16,792
|
|
|
$
|
(41,374
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt (b)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
(16,792
|
) (d)
|
|
$
|
41,374
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Gains/Losses included in the other expense section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Income.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Gains/Losses included in the all other income and commissions section of the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents par value of long term debt being hedged.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Represents gains and losses attributable to changes in fair value due to interest rate risk as
designated in ASC 815-10-45 hedging relationships.
|
48
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN elected the fair value option on a prospective basis for almost
all types of mortgage loans originated for sale purposes upon adoption of the Financial Instruments
Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 825-10-50). FHN determined that the
election reduced certain timing differences and better matched changes in the value of such loans
with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these assets. No transition
adjustment was required upon adoption of ASC 825-10-50 as FHN continued to account for mortgage
loans held for sale which were originated prior to 2008 at the lower of cost or market value.
Mortgage loans originated for sale are included in loans held for sale on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Condition. Other interests retained in relation to residential loan sales
and securitizations are included in trading securities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition. Additionally, effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification Topic for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820-10-50) for existing fair
value measurement requirements related to financial assets and liabilities as well as to
non-financial assets and liabilities which are re-measured at least annually. Effective January 1,
2009, FHN adopted the provisions of ASC 820-10-50 for existing fair value measurement requirements
related to non-financial assets and liabilities which are recognized at fair value on a
non-recurring basis.
FHN groups its assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets
in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to
determine fair value. This hierarchy requires FHN to maximize the use of observable market data,
when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. Each
fair value measurement is placed into the proper level based on the lowest level of significant
input. These levels are:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in
active markets.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active,
and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable
in the market.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant
assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own
estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow
models, and similar techniques.
|
For applicable periods, all divestiture-related line items in the Consolidated Condensed Statements
of Condition have been combined with the related non-divestiture line items in preparation of the
disclosure tables in this footnote. Derivatives in an asset position are included within Other
Assets while derivatives in a liability position are included within Other Liabilities. Derivative
positions constitute the only recurring Level 3 measurements within Other Assets and Other
Liabilities.
49
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Trading
securities - Capital Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
93,238
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
93,238
|
|
Government agency issued MBS
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120,713
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120,713
|
|
Government agency issued CMO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,395
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,395
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,095
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,095
|
|
States and municipalities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,871
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,871
|
|
Corporate and other debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
277,817
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
277,851
|
|
Equity, mutual funds and other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
Total
trading securities - Capital Markets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
590,054
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
590,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
securities - Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,142
|
|
|
|
98,899
|
|
|
|
111,041
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35,606
|
|
|
|
219,289
|
|
|
|
254,895
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
48,325
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
48,325
|
|
Government agency issued MBS
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,053,914
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,053,914
|
|
Government agency issued CMO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,075,753
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,075,753
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,548
|
|
|
|
100,224
|
|
|
|
121,772
|
|
States and municipalities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,590
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
46,090
|
|
Corporate and other debt
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
Equity, mutual funds and other
|
|
|
36,742
|
|
|
|
46,900
|
|
|
|
15,803
|
|
|
|
99,445
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
|
37,579
|
|
|
|
2,291,030
|
|
|
|
118,892
|
|
|
|
2,447,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
289,282
|
|
|
|
289,282
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
35,984
|
|
|
|
316,109
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
352,093
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
73,574
|
|
|
$
|
3,244,941
|
|
|
$
|
726,408
|
|
|
$
|
4,044,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities Capital Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
246,532
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
246,532
|
|
Government agency issued MBS
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
Corporate and other debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
164,286
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
164,286
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities Capital Markets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
415,293
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
415,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other short-term borrowings and commercial paper
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,050
|
|
|
|
34,050
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
197,987
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
198,966
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
979
|
|
|
$
|
613,280
|
|
|
$
|
34,050
|
|
|
$
|
648,309
|
|
|
50
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
2,159
|
|
|
$
|
1,272,453
|
|
|
$
|
286,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,561,024
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
334,112
|
|
|
|
10,117
|
|
|
|
344,229
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
35,800
|
|
|
|
2,507,114
|
|
|
|
147,820
|
|
|
|
2,690,734
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
798,491
|
|
|
|
798,491
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
83,133
|
|
|
|
257,814
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
341,276
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
121,092
|
|
|
$
|
4,371,493
|
|
|
$
|
1,243,169
|
|
|
$
|
5,735,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
380,782
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
380,896
|
|
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
107,266
|
|
|
|
107,266
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
14,328
|
|
|
|
136,488
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
150,877
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
14,442
|
|
|
$
|
517,270
|
|
|
$
|
107,327
|
|
|
$
|
639,039
|
|
|
51
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
Changes in Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
In third quarter 2009, FHN reviewed the allocation of fair value between MSR and excess interest
from prior first lien loan sales and securitizations. As a result, $11.1 million was reclassified
from trading securities to MSR within level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
In first quarter 2009, FHN changed the fair value methodology for certain loans held for sale. The
methodology change had a minimal effect on the valuation of the applicable loans. Consistent with
this change, the applicable amounts are presented as a transfer into Level 3 loans held for sale in
the following rollforwards. See Determination of Fair Value for a detailed discussion of the
changes in valuation methodology.
In third quarter 2008, FHN revised its methodology for valuing hedges of MSR and excess interest
that were retained from prior securitizations. Consistent with this change, the applicable amounts
are presented as a transfer out of net derivative assets and liabilities in the following
rollforwards for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008. See Determination of
Fair Value for a detailed discussion of the changes in valuation methodology.
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Other short-term
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Loans held
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Venture
|
|
|
servicing
|
|
|
borrowings and
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
securities
|
(a)
|
|
for sale
|
|
|
portfolio
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
rights, net
|
|
|
commercial paper
|
|
Balance on June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
125,502
|
|
|
$
|
224,372
|
|
|
$
|
104,658
|
|
|
$
|
18,771
|
|
|
$
|
337,096
|
|
|
$
|
39,720
|
|
Total net gains/(losses) included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(35,993
|
)
|
|
|
(5,670
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net
|
|
|
(14,135
|
)
|
|
|
(7,567
|
)
|
|
|
(4,652
|
)
|
|
|
(1,640
|
)
|
|
|
(22,898
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net transfers into/(out of) Level 3
|
|
|
(11,077
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,077
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Balance on September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
98,945
|
|
|
$
|
219,289
|
|
|
$
|
101,724
|
|
|
$
|
17,168
|
|
|
$
|
289,282
|
|
|
$
|
34,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) included in net income
|
|
$
|
(4,414
|
) (b)
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
(d)
|
|
$
|
(35,993
|
) (e)
|
|
$
|
(5,670
|
) (c)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Net derivative
|
|
|
Other short-term
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Loans held
|
|
|
available
|
|
|
servicing
|
|
|
assets and
|
|
|
borrowings and
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
securities
|
|
|
for sale
|
|
|
for sale
|
|
|
rights, net
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
commercial paper
|
|
Balance on June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
429,017
|
|
|
$
|
3,712
|
|
|
$
|
146,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,395
|
|
|
$
|
95,520
|
|
|
$
|
205,412
|
|
Total net gains/(losses) included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(19,023
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(61,806
|
)
|
|
|
92,577
|
|
|
|
(24,360
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net
|
|
|
(123,582
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
(2,578
|
)
|
|
|
(279,098
|
)
|
|
|
(72,158
|
)
|
|
|
(73,786
|
)
|
Net transfers into/(out of) Level 3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,063
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(115,671
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Balance on September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
286,412
|
|
|
$
|
10,117
|
|
|
$
|
147,820
|
|
|
$
|
798,491
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
107,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) included in net income
|
|
$
|
(34,403
|
) (f)
|
|
$
|
(5,760
|
) (c)
|
|
$
|
(304
|
) (d)
|
|
$
|
(31,470
|
) (g)
|
|
$
|
97,856
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
(24,360
|
) (c)
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
(a)
|
|
Primarily represents Mortgage Banking trading securities. Capital Markets Level 3 trading
securities are not significant.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes $(.2) million included in Capital Markets noninterest income, $(3.3) million included
in Mortgage Banking noninterest income, and $(.9) million included in Revenue from loan sales and
securitizations.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Represents recognized gains and losses attributable to venture capital investments classified
within securities available for sale that are included in Securities gains/(losses) in noninterest
income.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Includes $(35.8) million included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income and $(.2) million
included in Revenue from loan sales and securitizations.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Includes $(12.2) million included in Capital Markets noninterest income, $(21.7) million
included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income, and $(.5) million in Revenue from loan sales and
securitizations.
|
|
(g)
|
|
Includes $(31.2) million in Mortgage Banking noninterest income and $(.2) million included in
Revenue from loan sales and securitizations.
|
52
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Net derivative
|
|
|
Other short-term
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Loans held
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Venture
|
|
|
servicing
|
|
|
assets and
|
|
|
borrowings and
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
securities(a)
|
|
|
for sale
|
|
|
portfolio
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
rights, net
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
commercial paper
|
|
Balance on December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
153,542
|
|
|
$
|
11,330
|
|
|
$
|
111,840
|
|
|
$
|
25,307
|
|
|
$
|
376,844
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
27,957
|
|
Total net gains/(losses) included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
44,757
|
|
|
|
(5,844
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,556
|
)
|
|
|
42,498
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements, net
|
|
|
(88,277
|
)
|
|
|
(27,743
|
)
|
|
|
(13,289
|
)
|
|
|
(6,582
|
)
|
|
|
(141,137
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
Net transfers into/(out of) Level 3
|
|
|
(11,077
|
)
|
|
|
241,546
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,077
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Balance on September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
98,945
|
|
|
$
|
219,289
|
|
|
$
|
101,724
|
|
|
$
|
17,169
|
|
|
$
|
289,282
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
34,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) included
in net income
|
|
$
|
26,108
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
(5,844
|
) (c)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(1,556
|
) (d)
|
|
$
|
42,498
|
(e)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,792
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Net derivative
|
|
|
Other short-term
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Loans held
|
|
|
available
|
|
|
servicing
|
|
|
assets and
|
|
|
borrowings and
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
securities
|
|
|
for sale
|
|
|
for sale
|
|
|
rights, net
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
commercial paper
|
|
|
Balance on December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
476,404
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
159,301
|
|
|
$
|
1,159,820
|
|
|
$
|
81,517
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Total net gains/(losses) included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(69,905
|
)
|
|
|
146,844
|
|
|
|
(7,675
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,278
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net
|
|
|
(212,985
|
)
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
|
|
(7,899
|
)
|
|
|
(291,424
|
)
|
|
|
(119,998
|
)
|
|
|
114,941
|
|
Net transfers into/(out of) Level 3
|
|
|
21,939
|
|
|
|
11,795
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(108,095
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Balance on September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
286,412
|
|
|
$
|
10,117
|
|
|
$
|
147,820
|
|
|
$
|
798,491
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
107,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) included in net income
|
|
$
|
(48,560
|
) (f)
|
|
$
|
(8,401
|
) (c)
|
|
$
|
(304
|
) (d)
|
|
$
|
(59,668
|
) (g)
|
|
$
|
21,301
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
(7,675
|
) (c)
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
(a)
|
|
Primarily represents Mortgage Banking trading securities. Capital Markets Level 3 trading
securities are not significant.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes $(2.2) million included in Capital Markets noninterest income, $31.2 million included
in Mortgage Banking noninterest income, and $(2.9) million included in Revenue from loan sales and
securitizations.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Represents recognized gains and losses attributable to venture capital investments classified
within securities available for sale that are included in Securities gains/(losses) in noninterest
income.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Includes $46.9 million included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income and $(4.4) million
included in Revenue from loan sales and securitizations.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Includes $(14.9) million included in Capital Markets noninterest income, $(22.9) million
included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income, and $(10.7) million included in Revenue from loan
sales and securitizations.
|
|
(g)
|
|
Includes $(49.7) million included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income and $(10.0) million
included in Revenue from loan sales and securitizations.
|
53
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
From time to time, FHN may be required to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the
application of LOCOM accounting or write-downs of individual assets. For assets measured at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis which were still held on the balance sheet at September 30, 2009, and
2008, respectively, the following tables provide the level of valuation assumptions used to
determine each adjustment, the related carrying value, and the fair value adjustments recorded
during the respective periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total losses/(gains)
|
|
|
Total losses/(gains)
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
35,888
|
|
|
$
|
24,303
|
|
|
$
|
60,191
|
|
|
$
|
(2,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,827
|
)
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
516
|
(c)
|
Loans, net of unearned income (a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
515,101
|
|
|
|
515,101
|
|
|
|
59,992
|
|
|
|
214,299
|
|
Real estate acquired by foreclosure (b)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
111,389
|
|
|
|
111,389
|
|
|
|
8,767
|
|
|
|
27,659
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
112,505
|
|
|
|
112,505
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
6,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,881
|
|
|
$
|
245,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total losses
|
|
|
Total losses
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
55,149
|
|
|
$
|
45,052
|
|
|
$
|
100,201
|
|
|
$
|
1,767
|
|
|
$
|
27,070
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
(c)
|
Loans, net of unearned income (a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
364,097
|
|
|
|
364,097
|
|
|
|
67,400
|
|
|
|
142,683
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
119,979
|
|
|
|
119,979
|
|
|
|
10,205
|
|
|
|
14,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79,457
|
|
|
$
|
185,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents carrying value of loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value
of the collateral. Writedowns on these loans are recognized as part
of provision.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents the fair value and related losses of foreclosed properties that were measured
subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents recognition of other than temporary impairment for cost method investments
classified within securities available for sale.
|
In first quarter 2008, FHN recognized a lower of cost or market reduction in value of $36.2
million on its warehouse of trust preferred loans, which was classified within level 3 for loans
held for sale at March 31, 2008. The determination of estimated market value for the warehouse was
based on a hypothetical securitization transaction for the warehouse as a whole. FHN used
observable data related to prior securitization transactions as well as changes in credit spreads
in the collateralized debt obligation (CDO) market since the most recent transaction. FHN also
incorporated significant internally developed assumptions within its valuation of the warehouse,
including estimated prepayments and estimated defaults. In accordance with ASC 820-10-50, FHN
excluded transaction costs related to the hypothetical securitization in determining fair value.
In second quarter 2008, FHN designated its trust preferred warehouse as held to maturity.
Accordingly, these loans were excluded from loans held for sale in the nonrecurring measurements
table as of September 30, 2008. In conjunction with the transfer of these loans to held to maturity
status, FHN performed a lower of cost or market analysis on the date of transfer. This analysis was
based on the pricing of market transactions involving securities similar to those held in the trust
preferred warehouse with consideration given, as applicable, to any differences in characteristics
of the market transactions, including issuer credit quality, call features and term. As a result of
the lower of cost or market analysis, FHN determined that its existing valuation of the trust
preferred warehouse was appropriate.
In first quarter 2008, FHN recognized a lower of cost or market reduction in value of $17.0 million
relating to mortgage warehouse loans. Approximately $10.5 million was attributable to increased
delinquencies or aging of loans. The market values for these loans were estimated using historical
sales prices for these type loans, adjusted for incremental price concessions that a third party
investor is assumed to require due to tightening credit markets and deteriorating housing prices.
These assumptions were based on published information about actual and
54
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
projected deteriorations in the housing market as well as changes in credit spreads. The
remaining reduction in value of $6.5 million was attributable to lower investor prices, due
primarily to credit spread widening. This reduction was calculated by comparing the total fair
value
of loans (using the same methodology that is used for fair value option loans) to carrying value
for the aggregate population of loans that were not delinquent or aged.
FHN recognized a lower of cost or market reduction in value of $8.3 million relating to mortgage
warehouse loans during second quarter
of 2008. Approximately $7.1 million was attributable to increased repurchases and delinquencies or
aging of warehouse loans; the remaining
reduction in value was attributable to lower investor prices, due primarily to credit spread
widening. The market values for these loans were estimated using historical sales prices for these
types of loans, adjusted for incremental price concessions that a third party investor was assumed
to require due to tightening credit markets and deteriorating housing prices. These assumptions
were based on published information about actual and projected deteriorations in the housing market
as well as changes in credit spreads.
FHN recognized a lower of cost or market reduction in value of $1.3 million relating to mortgage
warehouse loans during third quarter of 2008. This was primarily attributable to increased
repurchases and delinquencies of warehouse loans with some reduction in value attributable to lower
investor prices, due primarily to credit spread widening. The market values for these loans were
estimated using historical sales prices for similar type loans, adjusted for incremental price
concessions that a third party investor is assumed to require due to tightening credit markets and
deteriorating housing prices. These assumptions were based on published information about actual
and projected deteriorations in the housing market as well as changes in credit spreads.
Fair Value Option
FHN elected the fair value option on a prospective basis for almost all types of mortgage loans
originated for sale purposes under the Financial Instruments Topic (ASC 825-10-50). FHN determined
that the election reduced certain timing differences and better matched changes in the value of
such loans with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these assets.
In 2009 and 2008, FHN transferred certain servicing assets in transactions that did not qualify for
sale treatment due to certain recourse provisions. The associated proceeds are recognized within
Other Short Term Borrowings and Commercial Paper in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition as of September 30, 2009, and 2008. Since the servicing assets are recognized at fair
value and changes in the fair value of the related financing liabilities will exactly mirror the
change in fair value of the associated servicing assets, management elected to account for the
financing liabilities at fair value. Since the servicing assets have already been delivered to the
buyer, the fair value of the financing liabilities associated with the transaction does not reflect
any instrument-specific credit risk.
The following table reflects the differences between the fair value carrying amount of mortgages
held for sale measured at fair value in accordance with managements election and the aggregate
unpaid principal amount FHN is contractually entitled to receive at maturity.
55
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value carrying
|
|
|
Fair value carrying
|
|
Aggregate unpaid
|
|
amount less aggregate
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
amount
|
|
principal
|
|
unpaid principal
|
|
Loans held for sale reported at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
254,895
|
|
|
$
|
297,608
|
|
|
$
|
(42,713)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
12,727
|
|
|
|
28,406
|
|
|
|
(15,679)
|
|
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing
|
|
|
5,521
|
|
|
|
12,257
|
|
|
|
(6,736)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value carrying
|
|
|
Fair value carrying
|
|
Aggregate unpaid
|
|
amount less aggregate
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
principal
|
|
unpaid principal
|
|
Loans held for sale reported at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
344,229
|
|
|
$
|
363,085
|
|
|
$
|
(18,856)
|
|
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
3,410
|
|
|
|
(1,565)
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities accounted for under ASC 825-10-50 are initially measured at fair value with
subsequent changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Such changes in the fair value of assets
and liabilities for which FHN elected the fair value option are included in current period earnings
with classification in the income statement line item reflected in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Changes in fair value included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
1,523
|
|
|
$
|
(14,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,805
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,423
|
)
|
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(5,670
|
)
|
|
|
(24,360
|
)
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
(7,675
|
)
|
Estimated changes in fair value due to credit risk (loans held for sale)
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
(8,849
|
)
|
|
|
(10,871
|
)
|
|
|
(18,310
|
)
|
|
For the three and nine months periods ended September 30, 2009, the amounts for loans held for sale
includes approximately $4.2 million and $13.0 million, respectively, of losses included in earnings
that are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk. For the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008, the amounts for loans held for sale includes approximately $8.8
million and $18.3 million, respectively, of losses included in earnings that are attributable to
changes in instrument-specific credit risk. The portion of the fair value adjustments related to
credit risk was determined based on both a quality adjustment for delinquencies and the full credit
spread on the non-conforming loans.
Interest income on mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value is calculated based on the
note rate of the loan and is recorded in the interest income section of the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income as interest on loans held for sale.
Determination of Fair Value
In accordance with ASC 820-10-50, fair values are based on the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The following describes the assumptions and methodologies
used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments and MSR recorded at fair value in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition and for estimating the fair value of financial
instruments for which fair value is disclosed under ASC 825-10-65.
56
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
Short-term financial assets.
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell,
and interest bearing deposits with other financial institutions are carried at historical cost.
The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the relatively short time
between the origination of the instrument and its expected realization.
Trading securities and trading liabilities.
Trading securities and trading liabilities are
recognized at fair value through current earnings. Trading inventory held for broker-dealer
operations is included in trading securities and trading liabilities. Broker-dealer long positions
are valued at bid price in the bid-ask spread. Short positions are valued at the ask price.
Inventory positions are valued using observable inputs including current market transactions, LIBOR
and U.S. treasury curves, credit spreads, and consensus prepayment speeds. Trading loans are
valued using observable inputs including current market transactions, swap rates, mortgage rates,
and consensus prepayment speeds.
Trading securities also include retained interests in prior securitizations that qualify as
financial assets which may include certificated residual interests, excess interest (structured as
interest-only strips), interest-only strips, principal-only strips, or subordinated bonds. Residual
interests represent rights to receive earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the
underlying loans. Excess interest represents rights to receive interest from serviced assets that
exceed contractually specified rates. Principal-only strips are principal cash flow tranches, and
interest-only strips are interest cash flow tranches. Subordinated bonds are bonds with junior
priority. All financial assets retained from a securitization are recognized on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Condition in trading securities at fair value with realized and unrealized
gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of noninterest income on the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
The fair values of the certificated residual interests and the excess interest are determined using
market prices from closely comparable assets such as MSR that are tested against prices determined
using a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future
cash flows. The fair value of these retained interests typically changes based on changes in the
discount rate and differences between modeled prepayment speeds and credit losses and actual
experience. In some instances, FHN retains interests in the loans it
securitized by retaining certificated principal only strips or subordinated bonds. Subsequent to the MetLife
transaction, FHN uses observable inputs such as trades of similar instruments, yield curves, credit
spreads and consensus prepayment speeds to determine the fair value of principal only
strips. Prior to the MetLife transaction, FHN used the market prices from comparable assets such
as publicly traded FNMA trust principal only strips that are adjusted to reflect the relative risk
difference between readily marketable securities and privately issued securities in valuing the
principal only strips. The fair value of subordinated bonds is determined using the best available
market information, which may
include trades of comparable securities, independently provided spreads to other marketable
securities, and published market research. Where no market information is available, the company
utilizes an internal valuation model. As of September 30, 2009, no market information was
available, and the subordinated bonds were valued using an internal model which includes
assumptions about timing, frequency and severity of loss, prepayment speeds of the underlying
collateral, and the yield that a market participant would require.
Securities available for sale.
Securities available for sale includes the investment portfolio
accounted for as available-for-sale under ASC 320-10-45, federal bank stock holdings, short-term
investments in mutual funds, and venture capital investments. Valuations of available-for-sale
securities are performed using observable inputs obtained from market transactions in similar
securities. Typical inputs include LIBOR and U.S. treasury curves, consensus prepayment estimates,
and credit spreads. When available, broker quotes are used to support these valuations.
Stock held in the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Banks are recognized at historical
cost in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition which is considered to approximate fair
value. Short-term investments in mutual funds are measured at the funds reported closing net
asset values. Venture capital investments are typically measured using significant internally
generated inputs including adjustments to referenced transaction values and discounted cash flows
analysis.
Loans held for sale.
In conjunction with the adoption of ASC 820-10-65 in first quarter
2009, FHN revised its methodology for determining the fair value of certain loans within its
mortgage warehouse. FHN now determines the fair value of the applicable loans using a discounted
cash flow model using observable inputs, including current mortgage rates for similar products,
with adjustments for differences in loan characteristics reflected in the models discount rates.
For all other loans held in the warehouse (and in prior periods for the loans converted to the
discounted cash flow methodology), the fair value of loans whose principal market is the
securitization market is based on recent security trade prices for similar products with a similar
delivery date, with necessary pricing adjustments to convert the security price to a loan price.
Loans whose principal market is the whole loan market are priced based on recent observable whole
loan trade prices or published
57
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
third party bid prices for similar product, with necessary pricing adjustments to reflect
differences in loan characteristics. Typical adjustments to security prices for whole loan prices
include adding the value of MSR to the security price or to the whole loan price if the price is
servicing retained, adjusting for interest in excess of (or less than) the required coupon or note
rate, adjustments to reflect differences in the characteristics of the loans being valued as
compared to the collateral of the security or the loan characteristics in the benchmark whole loan
trade, adding interest carry, reflecting the recourse obligation that will remain after sale, and
adjusting for changes in market liquidity or interest rates if the benchmark security or loan price
is not current. Additionally, loans that are delinquent or otherwise significantly aged are
discounted to reflect the less marketable nature of these loans.
The fair value of non-mortgage loans held for sale is approximated by their carrying values based
on current transaction values.
Loans, net of unearned income.
Loans, net of unearned income are recognized at the amount of funds
advanced, less charge offs and an estimation of credit risk represented by the allowance for loan
losses. The fair value estimates for disclosure purposes differentiate loans based on their
financial characteristics, such as product classification, loan category, pricing features, and
remaining maturity.
The fair value of floating rate loans is estimated through comparison to recent market activity in
loans of similar product types, with adjustments made for differences in loan characteristics. In
situations where market pricing inputs are not available, fair value is considered to approximate
book value due to the monthly repricing for commercial and consumer loans, with the exception of
floating rate 1-4 family residential mortgage loans which reprice annually and will lag movements
in market rates. The fair value for floating rate 1-4 family mortgage loans is calculated by
discounting future cash flows to their present value. Future cash flows are discounted to their
present value by using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with
similar credit ratings and for the same time period.
Prepayment assumptions based on historical prepayment speeds and industry speeds for similar loans
have been applied to the floating rate 1-4 family residential mortgage portfolio.
The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated through comparison to recent market activity in
loans of similar product types, with adjustments made for differences in loan characteristics. In
situations where market pricing inputs are not available, fair value is estimated by discounting
future cash flows to their present value. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value
by using the current rates at which similar
loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same time period.
Prepayment assumptions based on historical prepayment speeds and industry speeds for similar loans
have been applied to the fixed rate mortgage and installment loan portfolios.
Mortgage servicing rights.
FHN recognizes all classes of MSR at fair value. Since sales of MSR
tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are
typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair
value of MSR. As such, FHN primarily relies on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair
value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant risk
characteristics of MSR such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age (new,
seasoned, or moderate), agency type and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that it
believes are comparable to those used by brokers and other service providers. FHN also periodically
compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions with brokers, service providers, recent market
activity, and against its own experience. Due to ongoing disruptions in the mortgage market, more
emphasis has been placed on third party broker price discovery and, when available, observable
market trades in valuing MSR.
Derivative assets and liabilities
. The fair value for forwards and futures contracts used to hedge
the value of servicing assets and the mortgage warehouse are based on current transactions
involving identical securities. These contracts are exchange-traded and thus have no credit risk
factor assigned as the risk of non-performance is limited to the clearinghouse used.
Valuations of other derivatives (primarily interest rate related swaps, swaptions, caps and
collars) are based on inputs observed in active markets for similar instruments. Typical inputs
include the LIBOR curve, option volatility, and option skew. Credit risk is mitigated for these
instruments through the use of mutual margining and master netting agreements as well as collateral
posting requirements. Any remaining credit risk related to interest rate derivatives is considered
in determining fair value through evaluation of additional factors such as customer loan grades and
debt ratings.
In third quarter 2008, FHN revised its methodology for valuing hedges of MSR and excess interest
that were retained from prior securitizations. FHN now determines the fair value of the interest
rate derivatives used to hedge MSR and excess interests using inputs observed in active markets for
similar instruments with typical inputs including the LIBOR curve, option volatility, and option
skew. Previously,
58
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
fair values of these derivatives were obtained through proprietary pricing models which were
compared to market value quotes received from third party broker-dealers in the derivative markets.
Real estate acquired by foreclosure.
Real estate acquired by foreclosure primarily consists of
properties that have been acquired in satisfaction of debt. These properties are carried at the
lower of the outstanding loan amount or estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell the real
estate. Estimated fair value is determined using appraised values with subsequent adjustments for
deterioration in values that are not reflected in the most recent appraisal. Real estate acquired
by foreclosure also includes properties acquired in compliance with HUD servicing guidelines which
are carried at the estimated amount of the underlying government assurance or guarantee.
Nonearning assets.
For disclosure purposes, nonearning assets include cash and due from banks,
accrued interest receivable, and capital markets receivables. Due to the short-term nature of
cash and due from banks, accrued interest receivable and capital markets receivables, the fair
value is approximated by the book value.
Other assets.
For disclosure purposes, other assets consist of investments in low income housing
partnerships and deferred compensation assets that are considered financial assets. Investments in
low income housing partnerships are written down to estimated fair value
quarterly based on the estimated value of the associated tax credits. Deferred compensation assets
are recognized at fair value, which is based on quoted prices in active markets.
Defined maturity deposits.
The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows to their
present value. Future cash flows are discounted by using the current market rates of similar
instruments applicable to the remaining maturity. For disclosure purposes, defined maturity
deposits include all certificates of deposit and other time deposits.
Undefined maturity deposits.
In accordance with ASC 825-10-65, the fair value is approximated by
the book value. For the purpose of this disclosure, undefined maturity deposits include demand
deposits, checking interest accounts, savings accounts, and money market accounts.
Short-term financial liabilities.
The fair value of federal funds purchased, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, commercial paper and other short-term borrowings is approximated by the
book value. The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value
because of the relatively short time between the origination of the instrument and its expected
realization. Commercial paper and short-term borrowings includes a liability associated with
transfers of mortgage servicing rights that did not qualify for sale accounting. This liability is
accounted for at elected fair value, which is measured consistent with the related MSR, as
described above.
Long-term debt.
The fair value is based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes for the identical
liability when traded as an asset. When pricing information for the identical liability is not
available, relevant prices for similar debt instruments are used with adjustments being made to the
prices obtained for differences in characteristics of the debt instruments. If no relevant pricing
information is available, the fair value is approximated by the present value of the contractual
cash flows discounted by the investors yield which considers FHNs and FTBNAs debt ratings.
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities.
For disclosure purposes, other noninterest-bearing
liabilities include accrued interest payable and capital markets payables. Due to the short-term
nature of these liabilities, the book value is considered to approximate fair value.
Loan Commitments.
Fair values are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements taking
into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standing.
Other Commitments.
Fair values are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements.
The following fair value estimates are determined as of a specific point in time utilizing various
assumptions and estimates. The use of assumptions and various valuation techniques, as well as the
absence of secondary markets for certain financial instruments, will likely reduce the
comparability of fair value disclosures between financial institutions. Due to market illiquidity,
the fair values for loans, net of
59
Note
16 - Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
unearned income, loans held for sale, and long-term debt as of September 30, 2009, involved the use
of significant internally-developed pricing assumptions for certain components of these line items.
These assumptions are considered to reflect inputs that market participants would use in
transactions involving these instruments as of the measurement date. We have not included assets
and liabilities that are not financial instruments (including MSR) in the following table such as
the value of long-term relationships with deposit and trust customers, premises and equipment,
goodwill and other intangibles, deferred taxes, and certain other assets and other liabilities.
Accordingly, the total of the fair value amounts does not represent, and should not be construed to
represent, the underlying value of the company.
The following table summarizes the book value and estimated fair value of financial instruments
recorded in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as well as off-balance sheet
commitments as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income and allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
17,579,921
|
|
|
$
|
16,161,268
|
|
Short-term financial assets
|
|
|
789,085
|
|
|
|
789,085
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
701,151
|
|
|
|
701,151
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
502,687
|
|
|
|
502,687
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,645,922
|
|
|
|
2,645,922
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
322,239
|
|
|
|
322,239
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
142,359
|
|
|
|
142,359
|
|
Nonearning assets
|
|
|
1,225,749
|
|
|
|
1,225,749
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined maturity
|
|
$
|
3,420,099
|
|
|
$
|
3,481,190
|
|
Undefined maturity
|
|
|
10,814,884
|
|
|
|
10,814,884
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
14,234,983
|
|
|
|
14,296,074
|
|
Trading liabilities
|
|
|
415,293
|
|
|
|
415,293
|
|
Short-term financial liabilities
|
|
|
4,006,846
|
|
|
|
4,006,846
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,079,468
|
|
|
|
2,441,129
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
198,965
|
|
|
|
198,965
|
|
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
592,904
|
|
|
|
592,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments
|
|
$
|
8,883,484
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
Other commitments
|
|
|
564,018
|
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
60
Note 17 - Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency
In 2007, FHN began conducting a company-wide review of business practices with the goal of
improving its overall profitability and productivity. In order to redeploy capital to
higher-return businesses, FHN concluded the sale of 34 full-service First Horizon Bank branches in
its national banking markets in the second quarter 2008 while also taking actions to right size
First Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking operations and to downsize FHNs national lending
operations. Additionally, in January 2008, FHN discontinued national homebuilder and commercial
real estate lending through its First Horizon Construction Lending offices. FHN also repositioned
First Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking operations through various MSR sales.
Additionally, on August 31, 2008, FHN and MetLife completed the sale of substantially all of FHNs
mortgage origination pipeline, related hedges, certain fixed assets and other associated assets.
MetLife did not acquire any portion of FHNs mortgage loan warehouse. FHN retained its mortgage
operations in and around Tennessee, continuing to originate home loans for customers in its banking
market footprint. FHN also agreed with MetLife for the sale of servicing assets and related hedges
on $19.1 billion of first lien mortgage loans and associated custodial deposits. FHN also entered
into a subservicing agreement with MetLife for the remainder of FHNs servicing portfolio. MetLife
generally paid book value for the assets and liabilities it acquired, less a purchase price
reduction.
Continuing the efforts to refocus on core businesses, a definitive agreement was reached in third
quarter 2009 for the sale of FTN ECM, the institutional equity research division of FTN Financial.
While the sale is expected to close in fourth quarter 2009 subject to regulatory approval and
customary closing conditions, FHN incurred a pre-tax goodwill impairment of $14.0 million
(approximately $9 million net of taxes) in third quarter 2009. This impairment and other
restructuring, repositioning and efficiency charges incurred by FTN ECM are included with the other
operating results for FTN ECM in the Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax line on the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for all periods presented.
Net costs recognized by FHN in the nine months ended September 30, 2009, related to restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency activities were $20.7 million. Of this amount, $4.6 million
represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost
Obligations Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 420-10-45).
Significant expenses recognized year to date 2009 resulted from the following actions:
|
|
Severance and related employee costs of $4.2 million related to discontinuation of national
lending operations.
|
|
|
Transaction costs of $1.1 million from the sale of mortgage servicing rights.
|
|
|
Loss of $1.0 million related to asset impairments from branch closures.
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment of $14.0 million related to agreement to sell FTN ECM.
|
Net costs recognized by FHN in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, related to restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency activities were $81.1 million. Of this amount, $39.4 million
represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with ASC 420-10-45.
Significant expenses recognized in year to date 2008 resulted from the following actions:
|
|
Expense of $39.4 million associated with organizational and compensation changes due to
right sizing operating segments, the divestiture of certain First Horizon Bank branches, the divestiture of certain mortgage banking
operations and consolidating functional areas.
|
|
|
Loss of $17.5 million on the divestiture of mortgage banking operations.
|
|
|
Loss of $1.4 million from the sales of certain First Horizon Bank branches.
|
|
|
Transaction costs of $12.7 million from the contracted sales of mortgage servicing rights.
|
|
|
Expense of $10.1 million for the write-down of certain premises and equipment, intangibles
and other assets resulting from FHNs divestiture of certain mortgage operations and from the
change in FHNs national banking strategy.
|
The financial results of FTN ECM, including the third quarter goodwill impairment, are reflected in
the Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax line on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Income for all periods presented. Losses from the disposition of certain First Horizon Bank
branches incurred during the periods presented are included in losses on divestitures in the
noninterest income section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income. Transaction costs
recognized in the periods presented from selling mortgage servicing rights are recorded as a
reduction of mortgage banking income in the noninterest income section of the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income. All other costs associated with the restructuring, repositioning,
and efficiency initiatives implemented by management are included in the noninterest expense
section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income, including severance and other
employee-related costs recognized in relation to such initiatives which are recorded in employee
compensation, incentives, and benefits; facilities
61
Note 17 - Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency (continued)
consolidation costs and related asset impairment costs are included in occupancy; costs
associated with the impairment of premises and equipment are included in equipment rentals;
depreciation and maintenance and other costs associated with such initiatives, including
professional fees, and intangible asset impairment costs are included in all other expense.
Activity in the restructuring and repositioning liability for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, is presented in the following table, along with other restructuring
and repositioning expenses recognized. All costs associated with the restructuring, repositioning,
and efficiency initiatives are recorded as unallocated corporate charges within the Corporate
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
18,383
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
17,945
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
24,167
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
19,675
|
|
Severance and other employee related costs
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
4,243
|
|
|
|
4,243
|
|
|
|
23,826
|
|
|
|
23,826
|
|
Facility consolidation costs
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
4,176
|
|
|
|
4,176
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
Other exit costs, professional fees, and other
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
Total Accrued
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
20,055
|
|
|
|
13,974
|
|
|
|
31,919
|
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
28,747
|
|
|
|
39,434
|
|
|
|
59,109
|
|
Payments related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and other employee related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,483
|
|
Facility consolidation costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,513
|
|
Other exit costs, professional fees, and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
Accrual reversals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
Restructuring and Repositioning Reserve Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,702
|
|
|
Other Restructuring and Repositioning Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking expense on servicing sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on divestitures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of premises and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Restructuring and Repositioning
Expense
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructuring and Repositioning Charges
|
|
$
|
15,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
Note 17 - Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency (continued)
Cumulative amounts incurred to date as of September 30, 2009, for costs associated with FHNs
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Severance and other employee related costs*
|
|
$
|
54,175
|
|
Facility consolidation costs
|
|
|
30,593
|
|
Other exit costs, professional fees, and other
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
Other restructuring & repositioning (income) and expense:
|
|
|
|
|
Loan portfolio divestiture
|
|
|
7,672
|
|
Mortgage banking expense on servicing sales
|
|
|
20,237
|
|
Net loss on divestitures
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
Impairment of premises and equipment
|
|
|
15,911
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
Impairment of other assets
|
|
|
30,101
|
|
|
Total Restructuring and Repositioning Charges Incurred to Date as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
210,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Includes $1.2 million of deferred severance-related payments that will be paid after 2009.
|
63
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
GENERAL INFORMATION
First Horizon National Corporation (FHN) began as a small community bank chartered in 1864 and is
now one of the 40 largest bank holding companies in the United States in terms of asset size.
Approximately 6,000 FHN employees provide financial services through more than 180 bank locations
in and around Tennessee and 21 capital markets offices in the U.S. and abroad.
The corporations two major brands First Tennessee and FTN Financial - provide customers with a
broad range of products and services. First Tennessee has the leading combined deposit market
share in the 17 Tennessee counties where it does business and one of the highest customer retention
rates of any bank in the country. FTN Financial (FTNF) is an industry leader in fixed income
sales, trading, and strategies for institutional clients in the U.S. and abroad.
AARP and Working Mother magazine have recognized FHN as one of the nations best employers.
FHN is composed of the following operating segments:
|
§
|
|
Regional Banking offers financial products and services, including traditional lending
and deposit-taking, to retail and commercial customers in Tennessee and surrounding
markets. Additionally, Regional Banking provides investments, insurance, financial
planning, trust services and asset management, credit card, cash management, and check
clearing services.
|
|
|
§
|
|
Capital Markets provides a broad spectrum of financial services for the investment and
banking communities through the integration of traditional capital markets securities
activities, loan sales, portfolio advisory services, derivative sales, correspondent
banking services, and equity research.
|
|
|
§
|
|
Mortgage Banking now consists of the origination of mortgage loans in and around the
regional banking footprint and legacy servicing. Prior to the August 31, 2008, sale of its
servicing platform and origination offices outside Tennessee, this division provided
mortgage loans and servicing to consumers and operated in approximately 40 states.
|
|
|
§
|
|
National Specialty Lending consists of legacy traditional consumer and construction
lending activities outside the regional banking footprint. In January 2008, FHN announced
the discontinuation of national home builder and commercial real estate lending.
|
|
|
§
|
|
Corporate consists of unallocated corporate expenses including restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency initiatives, gains and losses on repurchases of debt, expense
on subordinated debt issuances and preferred stock, bank-owned life insurance, unallocated
interest income associated with excess equity, net impact of raising incremental capital,
revenue and expense associated with deferred compensation plans, funds management, low
income housing investment activities, and venture capital.
|
For the purpose of this managements discussion and analysis (MD&A), earning assets have been
expressed as averages, unless otherwise noted, and loans have been disclosed net of unearned
income. The following financial discussion should be read with the accompanying unaudited
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and notes.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This MD&A contains forward-looking statements with respect to FHNs beliefs, plans, goals,
expectations, and estimates. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not a
representation of historical information but rather are related to future operations, strategies,
financial results, or other developments. The words believe, expect, anticipate, intend,
estimate, should, is likely, will, going forward, and other expressions that indicate
future events and trends identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant
business, operational, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are
beyond a companys control, and many of which, with respect to future business decisions and
actions (including acquisitions and divestitures), are subject to change. Examples of
uncertainties and contingencies include, among other important factors, general and local economic
and business conditions; recession or other economic downturns; expectations of and actual timing
and amount of interest rate movements, including the slope of the yield curve (which can have a
significant impact on a financial services institution); market and monetary fluctuations;
inflation or deflation; customer and investor responses to these conditions; the financial
condition of borrowers and other counterparties; competition within and outside the financial
services industry; geopolitical
64
developments including possible terrorist activity; recent and future legislative and regulatory
developments; natural disasters; effectiveness of FHNs hedging practices; technology; demand for
FHNs product offerings; new products and services in the industries in which FHN operates; and
critical accounting estimates. Other factors are those inherent in originating, selling, and
servicing loans including prepayment risks, pricing concessions, fluctuation in U.S. housing
prices, fluctuation of collateral values, and changes in customer profiles. Additionally, the
actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Federal Reserve), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), U.S. Department of the Treasury (UST), and other regulators
and agencies; regulatory and judicial proceedings and changes in laws and regulations applicable to
FHN; and FHNs success in executing its business plans and strategies and managing the risks
involved in the foregoing, could cause actual results to differ. FHN assumes no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements that are made from time to time. Actual results could differ
because of several factors, including those presented in this Forward-Looking Statements section,
in other sections of this MD&A, and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
periods ended September 30, 2009.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
In third quarter 2009, FHN reported a net loss available to common shareholders of $52.9 million,
or $.24 diluted loss per share, compared to a net loss available to common shareholders of $125.1
million, or $.58 diluted loss per share in 2008. In third quarter 2009, net loss available to
common shareholders reflected $14.9 million of dividends on the CPP preferred shares. In third
quarter, FHN contracted to sell Capital Markets institutional equity research group, FTN ECM. The
results of FTN ECM operations, including a third quarter goodwill impairment, are reported in
discontinued operations, net of tax on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
The results of operations for third quarter 2009 were positively affected by a decrease in
provisioning for loan losses and restructuring related costs, and increased capital markets income.
Provisioning for loan losses decreased $155.0 million from third quarter 2008 to $185.0 million.
While adverse economic conditions persisted into third quarter 2009, overall asset quality began to
stabilize as the size of the national construction portfolios declined significantly from the prior
year. Favorable market conditions in third quarter 2009 contributed to strong fixed income sales
at Capital Markets in comparison with 2008. Restructuring charges in third quarter 2009 were $15.7
million and consisted primarily of a $14.0 million goodwill impairment. Earnings in third quarter
2008 were affected by charges of $33.9 million related to restructuring, repositioning, and
efficiency initiatives. Mortgage banking results decreased significantly from 2008 due to the
third quarter 2008 sale of the national mortgage origination and servicing platforms. In addition,
foreclosure losses and provision for mortgage foreclosure and repurchase obligations increased
significantly from 2008.
Return on average common equity and return on average assets for third quarter 2009 were negative
9.02 percent and negative 0.52 percent, respectively, compared to negative 18.30 percent and
negative 1.46 percent in third quarter 2008. Capital ratios improved as tier 1 capital ratio was
16.20 percent as of September 30, 2009 compared to 11.10 percent on September 30, 2008, and total
capital was 21.61 percent compared with 16.07 percent in 2008.
Total period-end assets declined to $26.5 billion on September 30, 2009 from $32.8 billion on
September 30, 2008, while total equity increased to $3.4 billion on September 30, 2009, from $2.9
billion on September 30, 2008. While most balance sheet items declined, the contraction was
primarily driven by a $3.1 billion decrease in the loan portfolio.
BUSINESS LINE REVIEW
Regional Banking
The Regional Banking segment had a pre-tax loss of $27.5 million in third quarter 2009 compared to
pre-tax income of $4.1 million in third quarter 2008. Total revenues decreased $10.8 million to
$205.4 million in third quarter 2009. The provision for loan losses increased to $63.1 million in
third quarter 2009 from $58.2 million in third quarter 2008 primarily due to deterioration in the
Income CRE portfolio.
Net interest income decreased slightly to $124.0 million in third quarter 2009 from $128.2 million
in third quarter 2008 as net interest margin increased to 4.80 percent in third quarter 2009
compared to 4.64 percent in third quarter 2008. The increase in margin was primarily a result of
increased loan spreads due to lower cost funding and a decline in loans.
Noninterest income declined $6.7 million in third quarter 2009 to $81.4 million. Deposit fees were
down $4.3 million mainly due to a decline in retail non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees. Noninterest
expense increased to $169.8 million in third quarter 2009 from $153.9 million in third quarter
2008. The increase is primarily the result of increased foreclosure losses from fair value
adjustments and losses on dispositions.
65
Additionally,
in third quarter 2009, FHN recognized $5.1 million in credit losses on customer derivatives.
Additionally, credit and technology-related costs, and FDIC premiums resulted in higher expenses in
third quarter 2009.
Capital Markets
Pre-tax income increased from a loss of $5.6 million in third quarter 2008 to income of $10.4
million in third quarter 2009 with total revenues of $151.1 million in third quarter 2009 compared
to $109.0 million in third quarter 2008. In third quarter, FHN contracted to sell Capital Markets
institutional equity research group. Accordingly, results of these operations are reflected in
discontinued operations, net of tax for all periods presented. In third quarter 2009, Capital
Markets reported an after-tax net loss from discontinued operations of $1.2 million compared with a
loss of $1.5 million in the prior year.
Net interest income was $20.2 million in third quarter 2009 compared to $19.6 million in third
quarter 2008, despite a decline of $1.1 billion in earning assets, as the net interest margin
improved to 2.41 percent from 1.78 percent last year. The increase is primarily attributable to
increased mortgage warehouse lending volume.
Income from fixed income sales increased to $120.5 million in third quarter 2009 from $80.1 million
in third quarter 2008 reflecting the benefits of Capital Markets extensive distribution network
combined with favorable market conditions. Other product revenues were $10.3 million in third
quarter 2009 compared to $9.3 million in third quarter 2008. Revenues from other products include
fee income from activities such as loan sales, portfolio advisory, derivative sales, and
correspondent banking services.
Provision expense increased to $54.2 million in third quarter 2009 from $38.5 million which
primarily reflects incremental deterioration in the bank holding company and trust preferred loan
portfolios.
Noninterest expense increased by $10.3 million to $86.6 million in third quarter 2009. This
increase is primarily related to personnel costs which increased $7.8 million consistent with the
effect of increased production levels. Additionally, legal and professional fees increased
compared with third quarter 2008.
Mortgage Banking
Effective August 31, 2008, FHN completed the sale of Mortgage Bankings servicing operations and
origination offices outside Tennessee to MetLife. Additionally, in an effort to reduce balance
sheet risk, FHN has reduced the size of the servicing portfolio through bulk and flow sales
beginning in 2007. As a result of these transactions, components of origination activity,
servicing fees, and operating expenses for 2009 are significantly lower when compared to 2008.
The third quarter 2009 pre-tax income was $32.3 million compared with $44.4 million in third
quarter 2008 and total revenues decreased by $69.2 million to $68.6 million in third quarter 2009.
Net interest income decreased to $7.8 million in third quarter 2009 from $25.4 million in third
quarter 2008 due to the large decline in the average balance of the mortgage warehouse as a result
of the sale of national mortgage origination offices to MetLife. The provision for loan losses
decreased $14.7 million as performance in Mortgage Bankings permanent mortgage portfolio improved.
Noninterest income was $60.8 million in third quarter 2009 compared to $112.3 million in third
quarter 2008. Total servicing income decreased $32.2 million to $48.4 million in third quarter
2009 primarily from a decline in the size of the servicing portfolio and volatility associated with
hedging the Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR). Servicing fees were down $20.2 million consistent
with the decline in the size of the servicing portfolio. Net hedging gains were $30.8 million in
2009 compared to $50.8 million in 2008 due to a narrowing of spreads between mortgage and swap
rates and a smaller MSR asset. Net revenue from origination activity decreased to $9.7 million in
third quarter 2009 from $19.8 million in third quarter 2008. Third quarter 2009 origination income
included a $5 million positive fair value adjustment to the legacy mortgage warehouse. Origination
activity has significantly declined in comparison to third quarter 2008 due to the sale of national
mortgage origination platform. Currently, FHN only originates mortgage loans in and around its
Tennessee market.
Noninterest expense was $48.1 million in third quarter 2009 compared to $90.5 million in third
quarter 2008. The decline is mostly a result of the divestiture of certain mortgage banking
operations in third quarter 2008. These broad declines were somewhat diminished due to a third
quarter 2009 provision for foreclosure and repurchase reserve from prior loan sales related to the
legacy origination platform of $25.8 million. Foreclosure and repurchase provisioning was minimal
in third quarter 2008.
66
National Specialty Lending
National Specialty Lendings pre-tax loss improved to $72.0 million in third quarter 2009 compared
to a pre-tax loss of $217.2 million in third quarter 2008. Results improved due to a $160.9
million decrease in loan loss provision as the national residential construction portfolios have
contracted significantly during 2009.
Net interest income declined to $29.6 million in third quarter 2009 compared to $45.2 million in
third quarter 2008 as a result of the increase in nonaccrual loans and the wind-down of national
residential construction portfolios.
Noninterest income increased slightly to $6.1 million in third quarter 2009 compared to $4.1
million in third quarter 2008. Noninterest expense was $28.2 million from $26.0 million in 2008
primarily from higher foreclosure costs. Personnel expenses declined due to the wind-down of
operations.
Corporate
Corporate reported pre-tax income of $16.7 million in third quarter 2009 compared to a pre-tax loss
$33.9 million in third quarter 2008. Noninterest income was $24.7 million in third quarter 2009
compared to $2.2 million in third quarter 2008. Deferred compensation income increased $10.2
million, which is mirrored by a corresponding increase in personnel expense. Both periods included
gains on the repurchase of bank notes. Gains in third quarter 2009 were $12.8 million compared
with $18.9 million in 2008. In 2008, restructuring charges recorded in noninterest income included
a $17.5 million loss on the sale of the national mortgage origination and servicing platform.
Noninterest expense decreased $23.6 million to $17.2 million in third quarter 2009 from $40.8
million in 2008. Charges within noninterest expense related to restructuring, repositioning, and
efficiency initiatives decreased by $13.8 million from 2008. Additionally, $14.2 million of
restructuring charges (primarily includes a $14.0 million goodwill impairment) are included in
discontinued operations and relates to the agreement to sell Capital Markets institutional equity
research business. Third quarter 2008 included an $11.0 million increase to the contingent
liability for certain Visa legal matters while $7.0 million of the liability was reversed in third
quarter 2009.
RESTRUCTURING, REPOSITIONING, AND EFFICIENCY INITIATIVES
Beginning in 2007, FHN began conducting a company-wide review of business practices with the goal
of improving its overall profitability and productivity. In order to redeploy capital to
higher-return businesses, FHN concluded the sale of 34 full-service First Horizon Bank branches in
its national banking markets in third quarter 2008 while also taking actions to right size First
Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking operations and to downsize FHNs national lending operations.
Additionally, in January 2008, FHN discontinued national homebuilder and commercial real estate
lending through its First Horizon Construction Lending offices. FHN also repositioned First
Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking operations through various MSR sales.
On August 31, 2008, FHN and MetLife completed the sale of substantially all of FHNs mortgage
origination pipeline, related hedges, certain fixed assets and other associated assets. MetLife
did not acquire any portion of FHNs mortgage loan warehouse. FHN retained its mortgage operations
in and around Tennessee, continuing to originate home loans for customers in its regional banking
market footprint. As part of this transaction, FHN also agreed with MetLife for the sale of
servicing assets and related hedges on $19.1 billion of first lien mortgage loans and associated
custodial deposits. FHN also entered into a subservicing agreement with MetLife for the remainder
of FHNs servicing portfolio. MetLife generally paid book value for the assets and liabilities it
acquired, less a purchase price reduction.
Continuing the efforts to refocus on core businesses, a definitive agreement was reached in third
quarter 2009 for the sale of FTN ECM, the institutional equity research division of FTN Financial.
While the sale is expected to close in fourth quarter 2009 subject to regulatory approval and
customary closing conditions, FHN incurred a pre-tax goodwill impairment of $14.0 million
(approximately $9 million net of taxes) in third quarter 2009. This impairment and other
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency charges incurred by FTN ECM are included with the
other operating results for FTN ECM in the Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax line on
the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for all periods presented.
Net costs recognized by FHN during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, related to
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency activities were $20.7 million. Of this amount, $4.6
million represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification for Exit or Disposal Activities Cost Obligations (ASC 420-10-45).
Significant expenses recognized year to date 2009, including items presented in discontinued
operations, net of tax, resulted from the following actions:
|
|
|
Severance and related employee costs of $4.2 million related to discontinuation of
national lending operations.
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs of $1.1 million from the contracted sale of mortgage servicing rights.
|
|
|
|
Loss of $1.0 million related to asset impairments from branch closures.
|
67
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment of $14.0 million related to agreement to sell FTN ECM.
|
Net costs recognized by FHN during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, related to
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency activities were $81.1 million. Of this amount, $39.4
million represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with ASC 420-10-45.
Significant expenses recognized year to date 2008 resulted from the following actions:
|
|
|
Expense of $39.4 million associated with organizational and compensation changes due to
right-sizing operating segments, the divestiture of certain mortgage banking operations and
First Horizon Bank branches, and consolidating functional areas.
|
|
|
|
Losses of approximately $17.5 million on the divestiture of certain mortgage banking
operations.
|
|
|
|
Losses of approximately $1.4 million from the sales of certain First Horizon Bank
branches.
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs of $12.7 million from the contracted sales of mortgage servicing
rights.
|
|
|
|
Expense of $10.1 million for the write-down of certain intangibles and other assets
resulting from FHNs divestiture of certain mortgage operations and from the change in
FHNs national banking strategy.
|
Settlement of the obligations arising from current initiatives will be funded from operating cash
flows. The effect of suspending depreciation on assets held for sale was immaterial to FHNs
results of operations for all periods. As a result of the change in FHNs national banking
strategy, a write-down of other intangibles of $2.4 million was recognized in first quarter 2008
related to certain banking licenses. Additionally, as FHN focuses on core businesses, the
agreement to sell FTN ECM resulted in a $14.0 million goodwill impairment. The recognition of
these impairment losses will have no effect on FHNs debt covenants. The impairment losses were
recorded as an unallocated corporate charge within the corporate segment and are included in all
other expense on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income. Due to the broad nature of the
actions being taken, all components of income and expense are affected from the efficiency
benefits.
Charges related to restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008 are presented in the following table based on the income
statement line item affected. See Note 17 Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency Charges
and Note 2 Acquisitions/Divestitures for additional information.
Table 1 - Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency Initiatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(656
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,667
|
)
|
Losses on divestitures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,489
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18,913
|
)
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18,145
|
)
|
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
(31,580
|
)
|
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation, incentives, and benefits
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
10,333
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
23,471
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
8,309
|
|
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,257
|
|
Legal and professional fees
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
4,029
|
|
Communications and courier
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
All other expense
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
9,113
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
15,387
|
|
|
|
5,441
|
|
|
|
49,221
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,545
|
)
|
|
|
(33,532
|
)
|
|
|
(6,583
|
)
|
|
|
(80,801
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(14,154
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(14,139
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
Net loss from restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives
|
|
$
|
(15,699
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,903
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,722
|
)
|
|
$
|
(81,145
|
)
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
68
Activity in the restructuring and repositioning liability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008 is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
18,383
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
17,945
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
24,167
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
19,675
|
|
Severance and other employee related costs
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
4,243
|
|
|
|
4,243
|
|
|
|
23,826
|
|
|
|
23,826
|
|
Facility consolidation costs
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
4,176
|
|
|
|
4,176
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
Other exit costs, professional fees, and other
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
Total Accrued
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
20,055
|
|
|
|
13,974
|
|
|
|
31,919
|
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
28,747
|
|
|
|
39,434
|
|
|
|
59,109
|
|
Payments related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and other employee related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,483
|
|
Facility consolidation costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,513
|
|
Other exit costs, professional fees, and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
Accrual reversals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
Restructuring and Repositioning Reserve Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,702
|
|
|
Other Restructuring and Repositioning Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking expense on servicing sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on divestitures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of premises and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Restructuring and Repositioning Expense
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructuring and Repositioning Charges
|
|
$
|
15,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT
Total consolidated revenues decreased 5 percent to $494.7 million from $519.2 million in third
quarter 2008 primarily from decreases in mortgage banking income and net interest income, although
somewhat mitigated by increased capital markets income and lower restructuring charges.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income declined to $190.9 million in third quarter 2009 compared to $223.1 million in
third quarter 2008 as average earning assets declined 18 percent to $24.2 billion and average
interest-bearing liabilities declined 23 percent to $22.6 billion in third quarter 2009. The
decline in net interest income was driven by the wind down of the national loan portfolios and the
Mortgage Banking business.
The consolidated net interest margin was 3.14 percent for third quarter 2009 compared to 3.01
percent for third quarter 2008. A widening in the margin occurred as the net interest spread
increased to 2.89 percent from 2.65 percent in third quarter 2009 while the impact of free funding
decreased from 36 basis points to 25 basis points. The increase in the margin from 2008 is largely
attributable to a $1.1 billion reduction in Capital Markets lower yielding earning assets.
69
Table 2 - Net Interest Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Consolidated yields and rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
3.86
|
%
|
|
|
5.16
|
%
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
|
Capital markets securities inventory
|
|
|
3.72
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
|
Mortgage banking trading securities
|
|
|
12.46
|
|
|
|
12.86
|
|
Other earning assets
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
Yields on earning assets
|
|
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
|
Interest-bearing core deposits
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
|
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more
|
|
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
Capital markets trading liabilities
|
|
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
Short-term borrowings and commercial paper
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
Rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
Effect of interest-free sources
|
|
|
.25
|
|
|
|
.36
|
|
|
FHN - NIM
|
|
|
3.14
|
%
|
|
|
3.01
|
%
|
|
In the short term, the net interest margin is expected to improve modestly due to a focus on loan
and deposit pricing and as a result of the winding down of our national business. In the longer
term, FHN anticipates stronger margins presuming a more normalized credit and interest rate
environment.
NONINTEREST INCOME
Capital Markets Noninterest Income
The major component of capital markets revenue is generated from the purchase and sale of
securities as both principal and agent, and from other fee sources including loan sales, portfolio
advisory activities, and derivative sales. Securities inventory positions are generally procured
for distribution to customers by the sales staff. A portion of the inventory is hedged to protect
against movements in fair value due to changes in interest rates.
Capital markets noninterest income increased to $129.0 million in third quarter 2009 from $86.9
million in third quarter 2008. Revenues from fixed income sales increased by $40.4 million to
$120.5 million reflecting the benefits of Capital Markets extensive distribution network combined
with favorable market conditions. Other product revenues were $8.5 million in third quarter 2009
compared to $6.7 million third quarter 2008.
Table 3 - Capital Markets Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
Growth
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
Growth
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Rate (%)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Rate (%)
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
$
|
120,528
|
|
|
$
|
80,104
|
|
|
|
50.5 +
|
|
|
$
|
487,619
|
|
|
$
|
337,314
|
|
|
|
44.6 +
|
|
Other product revenue
|
|
|
8,515
|
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
|
26.1 +
|
|
|
|
26,508
|
|
|
|
(16,809
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital markets noninterest income
|
|
$
|
129,043
|
|
|
$
|
86,854
|
|
|
|
48.6 +
|
|
|
$
|
514,127
|
|
|
$
|
320,505
|
|
|
|
60.4 +
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM - not meaningful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income
Effective August 31, 2008, FHN completed the sale of Mortgage Bankings servicing operations and
origination offices outside Tennessee to MetLife. Additionally, in an effort to reduce balance
sheet risk, FHN has reduced the size of the servicing portfolio through bulk sales which
70
began in
2007. As a result of these transactions, components of origination activity, servicing fees, and
operating expenses for 2009 are significantly lower when compared to 2008.
Mortgage banking noninterest income decreased by $47.6 million in third quarter 2009 to $59.2
million as shown in Table 4.
Table 4 - Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income
(thousands)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination income
|
|
$
|
9,688
|
|
|
$
|
19,828
|
|
|
|
51.1 -
|
|
|
$
|
22,879
|
|
|
$
|
237,979
|
|
|
|
90.4 -
|
|
Servicing income
|
|
|
48,422
|
|
|
|
80,603
|
|
|
|
39.9 -
|
|
|
|
165,080
|
|
|
|
192,560
|
|
|
|
14.3 -
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
82.8 -
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
7,408
|
|
|
|
66.5 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage banking noninterest income
|
|
$
|
59,211
|
|
|
$
|
106,817
|
|
|
|
44.6 -
|
|
|
$
|
190,443
|
|
|
$
|
437,947
|
|
|
|
56.5 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking statistics
(millions)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinance originations
|
|
$
|
173.7
|
|
|
$
|
907.1
|
|
|
|
80.8 -
|
|
|
$
|
947.5
|
|
|
$
|
8,975.9
|
|
|
|
89.4 -
|
|
Home-purchase originations
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
2,199.4
|
|
|
|
97.3 -
|
|
|
|
139.3
|
|
|
|
8,465.9
|
|
|
|
98.4 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan originations
|
|
$
|
233.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,106.5
|
|
|
|
92.5 -
|
|
|
$
|
1,086.8
|
|
|
$
|
17,441.8
|
|
|
|
93.8 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing portfolio - owned
|
|
$
|
41,757.3
|
|
|
$
|
65,345.3
|
|
|
|
36.1 -
|
|
|
$
|
41,757.3
|
|
|
$
|
65,345.3
|
|
|
|
36.1 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total servicing income decreased $32.2 million to $48.4 million in third quarter 2009 primarily
from a decline in the size of the servicing portfolio and volatility associated with hedging the
Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR). Servicing fees were down $20.2 million consistent with the
decline in the size of the servicing portfolio. Net hedging gains were $30.8 million in 2009
compared to $50.8 million in 2008 due to a narrowing of spreads between mortgage and swap rates and
smaller MSR asset. Net revenue from origination activity decreased to $9.7 million in third
quarter 2009 from income of $19.8 million in third quarter 2008. Third quarter 2009 origination
income included a $5 million positive fair value adjustment to the legacy mortgage warehouse.
Origination activity has significantly declined in comparison to third quarter 2008 due to the sale
of national mortgage origination platform. Currently, FHN only originates mortgage loans in and
around its Tennessee market.
Other Noninterest Income
All other noninterest income includes deposit transactions and cash management fees, revenue from
loan sales and securitizations, insurance commissions, trust services and investment management
fees, net securities gains and losses and other noninterest income. Fees from deposit transactions
and cash management were down $4.1 million primarily due to a volume decline in transactions
resulting in lower retail NSF fees. A loss related to the divestiture of certain mortgage banking
operations resulted in a charge of $17.5 million in 2008 and is reflected in restructuring charges.
Additionally, both quarters included gains on the repurchase of debt with $12.8 million in 2009
and $18.9 million in 2008. Deferred compensation income varied from a $5.1 million loss in 2008 to
a $5.0 million gain in 2009. This is largely mirrored by a corresponding increase in deferred
compensation expense. Trust fees, insurance premiums, and revenue from loan sales and
securitizations decreased slightly from the prior year, a combined $3.3 million decline.
The following table provides detail on the other noninterest income caption on the consolidated
condensed statements of condition.
71
Table 5 - Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on repurchases of debt
|
|
$
|
12,800
|
|
|
$
|
18,919
|
|
|
|
$12,860
|
|
|
|
$31,515
|
|
Brokerage management fees and commissions
|
|
|
7,315
|
|
|
|
7,824
|
|
|
|
20,416
|
|
|
|
24,927
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
6,066
|
|
|
|
6,731
|
|
|
|
14,492
|
|
|
|
20,036
|
|
Bankcard income
|
|
|
5,173
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
15,145
|
|
|
|
16,855
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
(5,145
|
)
|
|
|
7,220
|
|
|
|
(10,370
|
)
|
Remittance processing
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
9,485
|
|
|
|
9,793
|
|
ATM interchange fees
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
2,263
|
|
|
|
7,638
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
Other service charges
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
9,196
|
|
|
|
9,628
|
|
Reinsurance fees
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
7,344
|
|
|
|
9,295
|
|
Consumer loan repurchases
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
(20,173
|
)
|
|
|
(11,699
|
)
|
Letter of credit fees
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
Electronic banking fees
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
4,592
|
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
Check clearing fees
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
2,587
|
|
Federal flood certification fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,869
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,796
|
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
21,984
|
|
|
|
21,761
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
58,352
|
|
|
$
|
55,575
|
|
|
$
|
115,585
|
|
|
$
|
143,996
|
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Total noninterest expense for third quarter 2009 decreased 10 percent to $349.9 million from $387.5
million in third quarter 2008. In 2008, noninterest expense included $15.4 million of costs
related to restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives compared with only $1.5 million
in third quarter 2009.
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits (personnel expense), the largest component of
noninterest expense, decreased $28.7 million from $207.4 million in third quarter 2008 primarily as
a result of headcount reduction from the sale of national origination and servicing platforms to
MetLife in third quarter 2008. The full impact of the headcount decline on personnel expense was
somewhat counteracted by increased Capital Markets variable personnel costs as fixed income
revenue was higher in third quarter 2009. Additionally, 2008 included $10.3 million of costs
related to restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives. These costs were minimal in
third quarter 2009.
Occupancy, equipment rental, communications, and operations services expenses declined a combined
$20.1 million primarily as a result of the 2008 mortgage divestiture and a decline in costs related
to restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives. The following table provides detail
of the other noninterest expense caption on the consolidated condensed statements of income. All
other expense only increased $11.0 million but includes several significant items. Provisioning
related to the Mortgage Banking foreclosure and repurchase reserve from the legacy origination
platform increased to $25.8 million from $.8 million in 2008 due to higher repurchase activity and
higher inherent loss content. Losses on foreclosed property increased $17.1 million to $21.2
million primarily as a result of fair value adjustments of OREO and net losses on dispositions.
FDIC premiums increased $4.7 million to $8.8 million in third quarter 2009. All other noninterest
expense declined $23.2 million primarily due to the Visa contingent liability. In 2008, FHN
recorded an additional $11.0 million as Visa settled a legal dispute, and in 2009, FHN reversed
$7.0 million in conjunction with Visa funding the escrow account for legal settlements. Generally,
all other expense categories decreased consistent with FHNs focus on reduction of non-core
businesses.
72
Table 6 - Other Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Other expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking foreclosure and repurchase provision
|
|
|
$25,751
|
|
|
|
$849
|
|
|
|
$67,116
|
|
|
|
$8,779
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
21,221
|
|
|
|
4,130
|
|
|
|
53,053
|
|
|
|
13,282
|
|
Deposit insurance premium
|
|
|
8,796
|
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
37,777
|
|
|
|
10,376
|
|
Contract employment
|
|
|
7,956
|
|
|
|
9,033
|
|
|
|
27,083
|
|
|
|
21,948
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
6,871
|
|
|
|
7,144
|
|
|
|
20,228
|
|
|
|
23,184
|
|
Low income housing expense
|
|
|
5,833
|
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
|
|
16,467
|
|
|
|
14,445
|
|
Advertising and public relations
|
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
9,040
|
|
|
|
16,507
|
|
|
|
25,454
|
|
Loan closing costs
|
|
|
4,503
|
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
|
|
17,056
|
|
|
|
35,092
|
|
Other insurance and taxes
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
9,062
|
|
|
|
5,867
|
|
Travel and entertainment
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
7,164
|
|
|
|
12,303
|
|
Loan insurance expense
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
5,957
|
|
|
|
3,788
|
|
Customer relations
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
5,858
|
|
|
|
6,976
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
8,566
|
|
Federal services fees
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
5,527
|
|
Employee training and dues
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
|
4,439
|
|
Bank examination costs
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
Complimentary check expense
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
3,711
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
27,490
|
|
|
|
52,958
|
|
|
|
30,448
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
105,514
|
|
|
$
|
94,488
|
|
|
$
|
354,458
|
|
|
$
|
237,815
|
|
|
INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate for third quarter 2009 was 38.2 percent reflecting tax benefits due to the
reported loss in 2009. The rate cannot be compared to third quarter 2008 due to the level of net
income reported in third quarter 2008. The positive impact of favorable permanent tax differences
in the amount of $9.0 million during third quarter 2009 was offset by $8.4 million negative tax
effect due to the surrender of a BOLI contract. Third quarter 2008 included $8.3 million of
favorable permanent differences.
No valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets has been recorded as of September 30, 2009,
other than a full valuation reserve related to state net operating losses that are not expected to
be realized. The valuation reserve is primarily a result of FHNs strategy of exiting the national
mortgage business. The company has considered all available evidence, both positive and negative,
in making its determination with respect to the need for a valuation allowance. This evidence
includes, but is not limited to, a large carryback position that can absorb a significant portion
of the deferred tax assets, future projected taxable income, projected future reversals of existing
deferred tax liabilities, and potential tax planning strategies. The large carryback position
primarily results from the sale of mortgage servicing rights during 2007 and 2008 which generated a
current tax liability that had been carried on our balance sheet as a deferred tax liability.
Additionally, federal taxes paid in excess of $90 million and $260 million in 2007 and 2008,
respectively, also contributed to the carryback.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In conjunction with the third quarter agreement to sell Capital Markets institutional equity
research group, FHN determined results, net of taxes, related to this business should be reflected
as a discontinued operation on the consolidated condensed statements of income for all periods
presented. Consistent with historical procedures, the component of discontinued operations that
meet the definition of restructuring charges are reflected in the corporate segment while those
amounts related to the standard operations is reflected in the capital markets segment. In third
quarter 2009, a $10.2 million loss was included in discontinued operations compared with a $1.7
million loss in 2008. Discontinued operations in third quarter 2009 primarily includes a $14.0
million pre-tax ($9.0 million after-tax) goodwill impairment.
ASSET QUALITY
Allowance for Loan Losses
Managements policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb
estimated probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses includes
the following components: reserves for commercial loans evaluated based on pools of
73
credit graded
loans and reserves for pools of smaller-balance homogeneous retail and commercial loans, both
determined in accordance with the Topic relating to Contingencies (ASC 450-20-50). The reserve factors
applied to these pools are an estimate of probable incurred losses based on managements evaluation
of historical net losses from loans with similar characteristics. Also included are reserves,
determined in accordance with the Receivables Topic (ASC 310-10-45), for loans determined by
management to be individually impaired.
The provision for loan losses is the charge to earnings that management determines to be necessary
to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) at a sufficient level reflecting
managements estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Analytical models based
on loss experience adjusted for current events, trends, and economic conditions are used by
management to determine the amount of provision to be recognized and to assess the adequacy of the
loan loss allowance. The provision for loan losses decreased 46 percent to $185.0 million in third
quarter 2009 from $340.0 million in third quarter 2008 primarily as result of the wind down of the
national portfolios.
Net Charge-Offs
Net charge offs increased to $201.7 million in third quarter 2009 from $154.7 million in 2008 and
the net charge off ratio was 424 basis points in 2009 compared to 284 basis points in 2008. All
portfolios reflected increased net charge-offs compared to third quarter 2008 with the
exception of the Residential CRE (Homebuilder and Condominium Construction) and One-time Close
(OTC) construction portfolios which have experienced improvement as FHN continues to wind down the
national portion of these portfolios.
While total charge-offs increased due to adverse economic conditions, FHNs methodology of charging
down collateral dependent commercial loans to net realizable value (NRV) also impacted charge-off
trends, especially in comparison to applicable ALLL. Generally, classified nonaccrual loans over
$1 million are deemed to be individually impaired in accordance with ASC 310-10-45 and are assessed
for impairment measurement. A majority of these loans (generally commercial loans over $1 million
that are not expected to pay all contractually due principal and interest) are included in the
Commercial Real Estate portfolios. When impairment is detected, loans are then written down to the fair
value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell (net realizable value). Fair value is based
on recent appraisals of collateral. Collateral values are monitored and further charge-offs are
taken if it is determined that the collateral values have continued to decline.
Also impacting increased charge-offs related to individually impaired loans are the significant
declines in collateral values experienced due to the prevailing real estate market conditions.
Therefore, charge-offs are not only higher due to the increased credit deterioration related to
these loans, but also due to the increased rate at which loans are charged down to net realizable
value because of rapidly declining collateral values. Net charge-offs related to collateral
dependent individually impaired loans were $60.0 million or 30 percent of total net charge-offs
during the third quarter of 2009. Because of the accelerated recognition of impairment of these
loans, the elevated charge-offs decrease the ALLL. Compression occurs in the ALLL to net
charge-offs ratio as the ALLL is generally not replenished for charge-offs related to individually
impaired collateral dependent loans because reserves are not carried for these loans.
Additionally, OTC loans are generally written down to appraised value if, when the loan becomes 90
days past due or is considered substandard, recently obtained appraisals indicate a decline in fair
value. Subsequent charge downs are taken thereafter in accordance with regulatory guidelines. In
third quarter 2009, net charge-offs related to OTC loans were $34.4 million, approximately 17
percent of total net charge-offs.
Nonperforming Assets
As included in Table 7, nonperforming loans (NPLs) in the loan portfolio were $1.1 billion on
September 30, 2009, compared to $.9 billion on September 30, 2008. The ratio of NPLs to total
loans was 5.87 percent on September 30, 2009, and 4.12 percent on September 30, 2008. In the
commercial portfolio, the increase in NPLs is primarily attributable to deterioration
Income-producing Commercial Real Estate (income CRE) portfolios. NPLs in the Income CRE portfolio
increased $124.7 million to $200.5 million, accounting for over half of the increase. NPLs in the
Commercial and Industrial (C&I) portfolio increased
$67.1 million to $147.1 million. Generally, the
continued adverse economic conditions have affected the Income CRE and C&I portfolios.
For the consumer portfolios, nonperforming permanent mortgages increased $64.4 million to $96.2
million and OTC nonperforming loans experienced a decrease of $67.8 million to $280.0 million.
Both portfolios are under stress due to the prolonged downturn in the housing market, however,
OTCs improvement primarily relates to the proactive efforts of management to address problem asset
resolution in construction lending.
Nonperforming assets were $1.2 billion on September 30, 2009, compared to $1.0 billion on September
30, 2008. The nonperforming assets ratio was 6.38 percent on September 30, 2009 and 4.63 percent
last year. Foreclosed assets declined when compared to third quarter 2008 as 2009 included higher
levels of overall asset reductions from disposition activity as well as fair value adjustments to
reflect current market conditions. Foreclosed assets are recognized at net realizable value,
including estimated costs of disposal at foreclosure.
74
While nonperforming asset levels are
expected to flatten or slightly decrease over the next few quarters, the NPA ratio will continue to
remain elevated throughout the current economic downturn as total loan balances continue to
decline.
The ratio of ALLL to NPLs in the loan portfolio increased to 0.87 times in third quarter 2009
compared to 0.85 times in third quarter of 2008. While nonperforming loans increased from the same
period last year, a portion of these loans does not carry reserves. As of September 30, 2009, the
total amount of individually impaired commercial loans was $604.0 million. The individually
impaired loans carried at NRV and that do not carry reserves were $559.8 million on September 30,
2009. The individually impaired loans mentioned above that are charged down to NRV represent 51
percent of nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2009. This approach
compresses the ALLL to nonperforming loans ratio because individually impaired loans are included
in nonperforming loans, but reserves for these loans are not carried in the ALLL. Residential CRE
loans were $307.4 million or 51 percent of all individually impaired loans while the remainder is
included in the C&I and Income CRE portfolios. Additionally, charged-down OTC loans are included
in nonperforming loans. As of September 30, 2009, OTC loans
accounted for 25 percent of
nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio. The ALLL related to OTC loans was $109.3 million which
provides a coverage ratio of 30 percent for inherent losses in the remainder of that portfolio.
Because of the
methodologies described above, the ALLL to NPL ratio is negatively impacted. Nonperforming loans
in the loan portfolio for which reserves are actually carried were approximately $361.0 million as
of September 30, 2009.
Potential Problem Assets
Potential problem assets in the loan portfolio, which are not included in nonperforming assets,
represent those assets where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused
management to have serious doubts about the borrowers ability to comply with present repayment
terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established
by the OCC for loans classified substandard. Potential problem assets
were $1.7 billion on
September 30, 2009, up from $1.0 billion on September 30, 2008. The significant increase in
potential problem assets primarily reflects downward credit grading and deterioration in the
commercial portfolio largely due to the current economic environment. Also, loans 90 days past due
increased $61.6 million to $126.8 million driven by increases in problem loans in the consumer real
estate portfolios. However, loans 30 to 89 days past due decreased to $308.3 million on September
30, 2009, from $423.6 million on September 30, 2008. Commercial loans 30-89 days past due
decreased 38 percent as a result of more effective portfolio management and consumer loans 30-89
days past due decreased 14 percent, lead by a reduction in the OTC portfolio. The current
expectation of losses from both potential problem assets and loans 30 to 89 days past due has been
included in managements analysis for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
While asset quality is expected to remain stressed in the near term due to the expectation that
economic conditions and the housing industry will remain weakened for the foreseeable future,
overall asset quality performance has begun to stabilize. Actual results could differ because of
several factors, including those presented in the Forward-Looking Statements section of this MD&A
discussion. Table 7, Asset Quality Information, provides summary asset quality data referred to in
the previous paragraphs and Table 8, Asset Quality by Portfolio, provides various asset statistics
based on FHNs internal loan classification.
75
Table 7 - Asset Quality Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance on June 30
|
|
$
|
961,482
|
|
|
$
|
575,149
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(212,561
|
)
|
|
|
(160,200
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
10,844
|
|
|
|
5,507
|
|
|
Ending balance on September 30
|
|
$
|
944,765
|
|
|
$
|
760,456
|
|
|
Reserve for off-balance sheet commitments
|
|
|
20,308
|
|
|
|
19,109
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses and reserve for off-balance sheet commitments
|
|
$
|
965,073
|
|
|
$
|
779,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
Nonperforming Assets by Segment
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Regional Banking:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans
|
|
$
|
252,763
|
|
|
$
|
133,138
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
32,078
|
|
|
Total Regional Banking
|
|
|
268,952
|
|
|
|
165,216
|
|
|
Capital Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans
|
|
|
103,463
|
|
|
|
27,284
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Total Capital Markets
|
|
|
104,979
|
|
|
|
27,884
|
|
|
National Specialty Lending:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans
|
|
|
662,695
|
|
|
|
718,624
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
60,605
|
|
|
|
57,251
|
|
|
Total National Specialty Lending
|
|
|
723,300
|
|
|
|
775,875
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans including held for sale (a)
|
|
|
100,799
|
|
|
|
20,930
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
22,459
|
|
|
|
25,589
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
123,258
|
|
|
|
46,519
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
1,220,489
|
|
|
$
|
1,015,494
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income
|
|
$
|
18,524,685
|
|
|
$
|
21,601,898
|
|
Insured loans
|
|
|
(398,937
|
)
|
|
|
(652,051
|
)
|
|
Loans excluding insured loans
|
|
$
|
18,125,748
|
|
|
$
|
20,949,847
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate from GNMA loans
|
|
|
10,619
|
|
|
|
35,943
|
|
Potential problem assets (b)
|
|
|
1,693,310
|
|
|
|
1,023,065
|
|
Loans 30 to 89 days past due
|
|
|
308,337
|
|
|
|
423,593
|
|
Loans 30 to 89 days past due - guaranteed portion (c)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Loans 90 days past due
|
|
|
126,843
|
|
|
|
65,233
|
|
Loans 90 days past due - guaranteed portion (c)
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due
|
|
|
32,987
|
|
|
|
45,959
|
|
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due - guaranteed portion (c)
|
|
|
32,987
|
|
|
|
45,959
|
|
Loans held for sale 90 days past due
|
|
|
46,792
|
|
|
|
54,354
|
|
Loans held for sale 90 days past due - guaranteed portion (c)
|
|
|
42,073
|
|
|
|
50,187
|
|
Off-balance sheet commitments (d)
|
|
$
|
5,537,238
|
|
|
$
|
6,746,309
|
|
|
Allowance to total loans
|
|
|
5.10%
|
|
|
|
3.52%
|
|
Allowance to nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio
|
|
|
0.87x
|
|
|
|
0.85x
|
|
Allowance to loans excluding insured loans
|
|
|
5.21%
|
|
|
|
3.63%
|
|
Allowance to annualized net charge-offs
|
|
|
1.17x
|
|
|
|
1.23x
|
|
Nonperforming assets to loans and foreclosed real estate (e)
|
|
|
6.38%
|
|
|
|
4.63%
|
|
Nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio to total loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
5.87%
|
|
|
|
4.12%
|
|
Total commercial net charge-offs (f)
|
|
|
3.68%
|
|
|
|
2.88%
|
|
Retail real estate net charge-offs (f)
|
|
|
4.84%
|
|
|
|
2.72%
|
|
Other retail net charge-offs (f)
|
|
|
3.71%
|
|
|
|
6.42%
|
|
Credit card receivables net charge-offs (f)
|
|
|
6.15%
|
|
|
|
4.70%
|
|
Total annualized net charge-offs to average loans (f)
|
|
|
4.24%
|
|
|
|
2.84%
|
|
|
(a) Third quarter 2009 and 2008 includes $68,507 and $11,829 of loans held-to-maturity, respectively.
(b) Includes 90 days past due loans.
(c) Guaranteed loans include FHA, VA, student, and GNMA loans repurchased through the GNMA repurchase program.
(d) Amount of off-balance sheet commitments for which a reserve has been provided.
(e) Ratio is non-performing assets related to the loan portfolio to total loans plus foreclosed real estate and other assets.
(f) Net charge-off ratio is annualized net charge offs divided by quarterly average loans, net of unearned income.
76
Table 8 - Asset Quality by Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Key Portfolio Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial (C&I & Other)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions)
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
|
$
|
7,618
|
|
|
30+ Delinq. % (a)
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
NPL %
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized)
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
Allowance / Loans %
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
Allowance / Charge-offs
|
|
|
1.48
|
x
|
|
|
1.41
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income CRE (Income-producing Commercial Real Estate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions)
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
$
|
2,038
|
|
|
30+ Delinq. % (a)
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
NPL %
|
|
|
10.87
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized)
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
Allowance / Loans %
|
|
|
8.29
|
%
|
|
|
3.73
|
%
|
Allowance / Charge-offs
|
|
|
2.37
|
x
|
|
|
15.48
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential CRE (Homebuilder and Condominium
Construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions)
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
30+ Delinq. % (a)
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
NPL %
|
|
|
42.35
|
|
|
|
23.64
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized)
|
|
|
13.41
|
|
|
|
11.95
|
|
|
Allowance / Loans %
|
|
|
9.17
|
%
|
|
|
7.55
|
%
|
Allowance / Charge-offs
|
|
|
0.62
|
x
|
|
|
0.58
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Real Estate (Home Equity Installment and HELOC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions)
|
|
$
|
7,148
|
|
|
$
|
7,830
|
|
|
30+ Delinq. % (a)
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
1.49
|
%
|
NPL %
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized)
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
Allowance / Loans %
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
Allowance / Charge-offs
|
|
|
1.04
|
x
|
|
|
1.12
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC (Consumer Residential Construction Loans)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions)
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
|
30+ Delinq. % (a)
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
NPL %
|
|
|
77.37
|
|
|
|
28.94
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized)
|
|
|
29.87
|
|
|
|
12.29
|
|
|
Allowance / Loans %
|
|
|
30.21
|
%
|
|
|
20.16
|
%
|
Allowance / Charge-offs
|
|
|
0.79
|
x
|
|
|
1.46
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions)
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
30+ Delinq. % (a)
|
|
|
8.09
|
%
|
|
|
7.38
|
%
|
NPL %
|
|
|
8.65
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized)
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
Allowance / Loans %
|
|
|
9.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Allowance / Charge-offs
|
|
|
1.46
|
x
|
|
|
5.48
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions)
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
30+ Delinq. % (a)
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
NPL %
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized)
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
Allowance / Loans %
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Allowance / Charge-offs
|
|
|
0.91
|
x
|
|
|
1.06
|
x
|
|
Loans are expressed net of unearned income. All data is based on internal loan classification.
(a) 30+ Delinquency % includes all accounts delinquent more than one month and still accruing interest.
77
STATEMENT OF CONDITION REVIEW
EARNING ASSETS
Earning assets consists of loans, investment securities, trading securities, loans held for sale,
and other earning assets. Earning assets averaged $24.2 billion and $29.6 billion in third quarter
2009 and third quarter 2008, respectively.
Loans
Average loans were $19.0 billion in third quarter 2009 compared to $21.8 billion in third quarter
2008, a decline of 13 percent from last year. The decrease was primarily driven by declines in
both commercial and consumer construction portfolios as FHN discontinued loan origination through
its national lending channel. C&I loans declined $.4 billion from prior year as new loan demand
has been soft. Average commercial and consumer real estate construction portfolios each declined
by $.9 billion. The commercial real estate portfolio (Income CRE) was relatively flat compared
with 2008. Additionally, consumer real estate loans (mainly HELOC and home equity loans) declined
$.5 billion driven by effort to reduce national portfolios. Average loans represented 79 percent
of average earning assets in third quarter 2009 and 74 percent in third quarter 2008. Additional
loan information is provided in Table 9 Average Loans and Note 4 Loans.
The commercial and consumer construction and national home equity portfolios are expected to
continue to contract due to conditions in the housing market and FHNs strategic goal to reduce
real estate concentrations in general. It is expected that average loans will continue to decline
in the near-term due to limited loan demand and as the national portfolios continue to wind-down.
Table 9 - Average Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
Commercial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and industrial
|
|
$
|
7,116.0
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
7,530.7
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Real estate commercial (a)
|
|
|
1,536.0
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1,497.8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Real estate construction (b)
|
|
|
1,245.6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(42.4
|
)
|
|
|
2,162.8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
|
|
|
9,897.6
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
11,191.3
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential (c)
|
|
|
7,674.4
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
8,166.3
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Real estate construction (d)
|
|
|
460.7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(65.9
|
)
|
|
|
1,350.1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other retail
|
|
|
127.5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
138.8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Credit card receivables
|
|
|
186.8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
193.5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Real estate loans pledged
against other collateralized
borrowings (e)
|
|
|
676.3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
721.8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail
|
|
|
9,125.7
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
10,570.5
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned
|
|
$
|
19,023.3
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
21,761.8
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Includes nonconstruction income property loans and land loans not involving development.
(b) Includes homebuilder, condominium, and income property construction and land development loans.
(c) Includes home equity lines of credit (average for third quarter 2009 and 2008 - $3.7 billion
and $3.8 billion, respectively).
(d) Includes one-time close product.
(e) Includes on-balance sheet securitizations of home equity loans.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consists of the mortgage warehouse, student, small business, and home equity
loans. During third quarter 2009 loans held for sale averaged $470.6 million, a decrease of 76
percent, or $1.5 billion from third quarter 2008. The majority of the decrease relates to the
mortgage warehouse which contracted by $1.5 billion as a result of the sale of the national
mortgage origination platform to MetLife in third quarter 2008.
78
Other Earning Assets
Trading securities decreased from $1.7 billion in 2008 to $1.0 billion in 2009 primarily as a
result of capital markets continued efforts to manage trading portfolio levels and also due to
current market conditions. Additionally federal funds sold and securities repurchase agreements
decreased $.7 billion from $1.2 billion in third quarter 2008. Average federal funds sold declined
as result of a reduction in short-term lending to correspondent banks and securities repurchase
agreements declined consistent with capital markets trading portfolio. Interest-bearing cash
increased $.4 billion as Federal Reserve deposits converted to interest-bearing accounts in the
fourth quarter 2008.
Noninterest-Bearing Assets
The strategic balance sheet reduction also contributed to a $.7 billion decline in MSR. In third
quarter 2008, FHN sold servicing rights on $19.1 billion of first lien mortgage loans representing
approximately $.2 billion of MSR. Additionally, FHN has completed a series of bulk sales to
further reduce the amount of servicing rights on the balance sheet.
Deposits/Other Sources of Funds
Core deposits increased 9 percent or $1.1 billion and averaged $13.3 billion as FHN has focused on
growing this low cost funding source, Average short-term purchased funds decreased to $6.2 billion
in third quarter 2009 from $11.2 billion in third quarter 2008 driven by a $3.4 billion decline in
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings primarily as a result of the contracting balance sheet. Federal
Reserve Bank borrowings declined $.5 billion and federal funds borrowings were relatively flat when
compared with third quarter 2008. Average long-term borrowings decreased by $2.8 billion
consistent with balance sheet contraction as long term bank notes matured or were repurchased and
extendable notes were not renewed.
Financial Summary (Comparison of first nine months of 2009 to first nine months of 2008)
FHN reported a net loss available to common shareholders of $258.8 million or $1.19 per diluted
share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The net loss available to common shareholders
was $136.3 million or $.74 per diluted share in 2008. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, return on average common equity and return on average assets were negative 14.46 percent and
negative 0.96 percent, respectively. Return on average common equity and return on average assets
were negative 7.35 percent and negative 0.48 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
For the first nine months of 2009, total revenues were $1.6 billion; a decrease of 13 percent
compared to $1.8 billion for the nine months ended 2008. Net interest income declined $103.6
million to $586.6 million primarily as average earning assets declined $5.4 billion from 2008.
Noninterest income for the first nine months of 2009 decreased to $987.3 million from $1.1 billion
in 2008.
Capital markets noninterest income increased by 60 percent to $514.1 million in 2009 from $320.5
million a year ago due to increased demand for fixed income securities resulting from market
volatility and illiquidity during the first nine months of 2009. A $36.2 million LOCOM adjustment
taken on the trust preferred warehouse in 2008 also contributed to the year over year increase in
capital markets noninterest income. These loans were transferred to the loan portfolio in the
second quarter of 2008.
Loan sale and securitization income increased from a loss of $7.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, to a gain of $3.7 million in 2009. A decline in residual values from prior
consumer loan securitizations of $7.2 million negatively impacted loan sale and securitization
income in 2008.
In 2008, FHN incurred an $18.9 million loss on divestitures, $17.5 million of which was related to
the divestiture of certain mortgage banking operations in third quarter 2008. There were no
similar repositioning charges that reduced 2009 noninterest income.
Mortgage banking income was $190.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to $437.9 million for nine months ended September 30, 2008. In third quarter 2008, FHN sold the
national mortgage origination and servicing platform to MetLife. As a result, origination and
servicing income is significantly lower in 2009 when compared to the first nine months of 2008.
The nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, included $1.1 million of transaction costs related
to MSR bulk sales considered restructuring charges while the same period in 2008 included $12.7
million.
Servicing income decreased to $165.1 million in the nine months of 2009 from $192.6 million
primarily due to a decline in gross servicing fees as a result of a decline in the size of the
mortgage servicing portfolio. Positive net hedging results were higher in 2009 when compared with
2008 as a result of wider spreads between swap and mortgage rates due to positive convexity in the
first quarter 2009. Additionally, the negative effect of MSR runoff was less significant in 2009.
79
Origination income declined significantly to $22.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease from $238.0 million. In 2009, origination income primarily includes origination
activity related to the regional banking footprint and fair value adjustments on the remaining
warehouse. In 2009, income from origination activity within the regional banking footprint was
$20.4 million and unhedged negative fair value adjustments to the remaining mortgage warehouse were
approximately $5 million.
The net securities loss in 2009 was $.3 million compared to a net gain of $64.8 million gain in
2008. The net securities gain in 2008 was due to the redemption of shares in connection with Visa
Inc.s initial public offering. Fees from deposit and cash management activities declined $12.6
million driven by a decrease in the retail NSF fees as a result of
lower transaction volumes. Trust fees were down $4.3 million from 2008
as market values of the managed trust accounts declined and insurance commissions were down $2.9
million.
Other noninterest income declined $28.4 million to $115.6 million in 2009. In 2008, debt
repurchase gains were $31.5 million compared with $12.9 million in 2009. Generally, all other
noninterest income categories declined from 2008 reflecting decreases in BOLI income and brokerage
commission consistent with general market declines and other declines resulting from FHNs focus on
core businesses. $8.5 million of the decline in other
noninterest income is the result of
higher repurchase losses related to prior HELOC and second lien loan sales when compared with 2008.
The exception was deferred compensation income which increased $17.6 million from the prior year.
Deferred compensation is affected by market conditions and is mirrored by an increase in deferred
compensation expense.
Provision expense for loan losses decreased by $55.0 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, from $800.0 million in the nine months of 2008 reflecting asset quality improvements as
the national portfolios continue to wind down.
Noninterest expense decreased to $1.2 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, from
$1.3 billion in 2008. In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, personnel expense was
$614.3 million compared to $755.4 million in 2008, a reduction of $141.1 million. The decline was
driven by mortgage banking headcount reduction from the sale of the national mortgage and servicing
platforms to MetLife which was partially negated by an increase in capital markets production.
Additionally, severance costs included in restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives
declined by $19.3 million from the prior year.
Occupancy, equipment rental and depreciation, communications and courier, and other operational
costs decreased a combined $74.2 million from 2008 as a result of the sale of national mortgage
origination and servicing platforms to MetLife including a $12.3 million decline related to
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives.
Partially offsetting the decreases noted above was an increase of $116.6 million in other expenses.
This increase is a result of a combination of various items. Provision for mortgage banking
foreclosure and repurchases related to legacy originations increased $58.3 million and losses on
OREO valuation adjustments and dispositions increased $39.8 million from 2008. FDIC premiums,
including the 2009 special assessment were up $27.4 million in 2009. Other expenses increased by
$22.5 million during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to September 30,
2008. The increase in other expense was affected by processing costs related to the regional
banking mortgage origination business, charges related to the increase in reinsurance reserves, and
a decline in net reversals of the Visa contingent liability from 2008.
Income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, were primarily affected by the effective
tax rate as well as permanent tax credits. The tax rate for the nine-month period ended September
30, 2008, cannot be compared to that of 2009 due to the level of pre-tax income. 2008 was
positively impacted by favorable state tax settlements while 2009 was affected by the surrender of
a BOLI contract resulting in a negative $8.4 million tax effect.
BUSINESS LINE REVIEW
Regional Banking
Total revenues for the nine-month period were $611.5 million, a decrease of 5 percent from $646.9
million in 2008. Net interest income decreased slightly to $372.5 million through September 30,
2009, from $379.0 million in 2008. Noninterest income decreased $28.9 million to $239.1 million
during the first nine months of 2009. Generally, there were broad-based declines in all fee income
items including trust fees, insurance premium, and annuity income. However, income from deposit
service charges experienced the largest decline as fees were down $13.3 million from the prior year
primarily from lower consumer NSF fees due to a decrease in transaction volumes.
Provision expense for loan losses decreased $11.0 million in 2009 from $222.9 million in 2008
reflecting proactive recognition and management of problem assets. Noninterest expense increased
to $506.5 million in 2009 compared to $446.9 million in 2008. The increase is primarily a result
of expenses including higher FDIC premiums, including the 2009 special assessment, increased credit
and technology-related costs, and a charge related to employee life insurance benefits.
80
Capital Markets
Total revenues for 2009 increased to $589.7 million compared to $386.7 million for same period in
2008. Net interest income was $69.2 million in 2009, an increase of $10.3 million from 2008. The
increase in net interest income is largely due to higher spreads on the correspondent banking loan
portfolio.
Fixed income revenue increased to $487.6 million in 2009 from $337.3 million in 2008 as production
increased reflecting the benefits of Capital Markets extensive distribution network combined with
favorable market conditions and illiquidity experienced during 2009. Other revenue increased to
$32.9 million from a loss of $9.5 million in 2008 as the prior year included a $36.2 million LOCOM
negative adjustment on the trust preferred warehouse. Provision for loan losses was $89.3 million
in 2009 compared to $72.0 million in 2008 reflecting incremental deterioration in the bank holding
company and trust preferred loan portfolios. Noninterest expense was $334.1 million, an increase
of $66.0 million from $268.1 million in 2008. The increase is primarily driven by higher variable
personnel costs as a result of increased fixed income revenue in 2009.
National Specialty Lending
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $84.7 million compared to $142.9
million in 2008. Net interest income was $94.3 million in 2009 compared to $152.9 million in 2008,
contributing to substantially all of the decline in revenues. The drop in net interest income is
primarily due to an increase in nonaccrual loans and the wind-down of the national construction and
home equity portfolios. Provision for loan losses decreased to $444.5 million in 2009 compared to
$498.0 million in 2008, reflecting the effect of the wind-down of the national residential
construction portfolios.
Noninterest income was a loss of $9.6 million for 2009 compared to a loss of $9.9 million in 2008.
The nine months of 2009 reflected increased charges related to higher estimated repurchase activity
from prior consumer loan sales. Repurchase costs were lower in 2008 but the prior year reflected a
negative fair value adjustment to the residual interests retained from prior consumer loan sales.
Noninterest expense rose to $101.1 million in 2009 compared to $82.1 million in 2008. The increase
was attributable to an increase in foreclosure losses, the 2009 FDIC special assessment, and
credit-related costs. These increases were partially mitigated by declines in personnel,
occupancy, and other operational costs as a result of the wind down of operations.
Mortgage Banking
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, were $230.8 million compared to $557.9
million in 2008. Net interest income declined $64.2 million to $29.6 million consistent with the
decline in the size of the mortgage warehouse. Noninterest income was $201.2 million in 2009
compared to $464.0 million in 2008 principally from decreased origination income. Provision for
loan losses was minimal in 2009 compared with $7.1 million in 2008 reflecting improved performance
of the permanent mortgage portfolio in this segment.
Servicing income decreased to $165.1 million in the nine months of 2009 from $192.6 million
primarily due to a decline in gross servicing fees as a result of a decline in the size of the
mortgage servicing portfolio. Positive net hedging results were higher in 2009 when compared with
2008 as a result of wider spreads between swap and mortgage rates due to positive convexity in the
first quarter 2009. Additionally, the negative effect of MSR runoff was less significant in 2009.
Origination income declined significantly to $22.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease from $238.0 million. In 2009, origination income primarily includes origination
activity related to the regional banking footprint and fair value adjustments on the remaining
warehouse. In 2009, income from origination activity within the regional banking footprint was
$20.4 million and unhedged positive fair value adjustments to the remaining mortgage warehouse were
approximately $5 million.
Noninterest expense in 2009 was $159.2 million compared to $389.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. Nearly all noninterest expense categories decreased as a result of the sale of
national mortgage origination and servicing platforms in 2008. The exceptions were increased
foreclosure and repurchase provision related to legacy originations, a rise in charges to increase
the reserve related to reinsurance contracts, and an increase in contract employment expenses to
facilitate transition of remaining operational tasks after the sale to MetLife. In 2009, the
provision for foreclosure and repurchase obligations was $67.1 million compared with $8.8 million
in 2008. Additionally, losses related to reinsurance contracts were $23.4 million in 2009 compared
with $10.1 million in 2008 and contract employment costs increased $5.8 million to $17.5 million in
2009.
Corporate
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, were $57.2 million compared to $79.8
million in 2008, primarily a result of the Visa securities gain in the prior year. Net interest
income for 2009 was $21.0 million, a $15.4 million increase over 2008. The increase in net
interest income is primarily a result of a decrease in funding costs.
81
Noninterest income, excluding net securities gains, increased to $36.4 million in 2009 compared to
$9.5 million in 2008. Gains on the repurchase of debt were $12.9 million in 2009 compared with
$31.5 million in 2008. Also, deferred compensation income increased $17.6 million which is
mirrored by an offset in personnel expense. Noninterest income in 2008 included $12.7 million in
transaction costs related to mortgage servicing sales that are reflected in restructuring charges.
Noninterest expense declined to $59.4 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to $73.1
million in the nine months of 2008. Charges recorded in noninterest expense related to
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives decreased $43.8 million to $5.4 million in
2009 compared to $49.2 million in 2008. The decline in restructuring charges was somewhat offset
by an increase in deferred compensation expense (mirrored by increase in deferred compensation
income) and a decline in net reversals in the Visa contingent liability. Additionally, $14.2 million of restructuring charges (primarily includes a $14.0 million goodwill
impairment) are included in discontinued operations and relates to the agreement to sell Capital
Markets institutional equity research business.
CAPITAL
Managements objectives are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks inherent in FHNs
businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards, and to assure ready access to
the capital markets.
Average equity increased to $3.4 billion in third quarter 2009 from $3.0 billion in third quarter
2008. Period-end equity was $3.4 billion on September 30, 2009, an increase of 17 percent from
third quarter 2008. The increase in average and period-end equity is primarily a result of FHNs
participation in the USTs Capital Purchase Program (CPP) that generated $866.5 million of proceeds
through the issuance of preferred stock and a common stock warrant. The capital increase due to
participation in the CPP more than offset the negative effect of net losses reflected in retained
earnings. Pursuant to board authority, FHN may repurchase shares from time to time and will
evaluate the level of capital and take action designed to generate or use capital, as appropriate,
for the interests of the shareholders, subject to legal, regulatory, and CPP constraints.
82
Table 10 - Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
of Shares that May
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet Be Purchased
|
|
(Volume in thousands)
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Announced Programs
|
|
|
Under the Programs
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1 to July 31
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
$12.05
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
39,698
|
|
August 1 to August 31
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39,698
|
|
September 1 to
September 30
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
$12.05
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Plan Programs:
-
|
|
A consolidated compensation plan share purchase program was announced on August 6, 2004. This
plan consolidated into a single share purchase program all of the previously authorized
compensation plan share programs as well as the renewal of the authorization to purchase shares
for use in connection with two compensation plans for which the share purchase authority had
expired. The total amount originally authorized under this consolidated compensation plan share
purchase program is 25.1 million shares. On April 24, 2006, an increase to the authority under
this purchase program of 4.5 million shares was announced for a new total authorization of 29.6
million shares. The authority has been increased to reflect the stock dividends distributed
through July 1, 2009. The shares may be purchased over the option exercise period of the various
compensation plans on or before December 31, 2023. Stock options granted after January 2, 2004,
must be exercised no later than the tenth anniversary of the grant date. On September 30, 2009,
the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the program was 31.5 million shares.
|
Other Programs:
-
|
|
On October 16, 2007, the board of directors approved a 7.5 million share purchase authority that
will expire on December 31, 2010. The authority has been increased to reflect the stock dividends
distributed through July 1, 2009. Purchases may be made in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions and are subject to market conditions, accumulation of excess equity,
prudent capital management, and legal and regulatory constraints. This authority is not tied to
any compensation plan, and replaces an older non-plan share purchase authority which was
terminated. On September 30, 2009, the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the
program was 8.2 million shares. Until the third anniversary of the sale of the preferred shares
issued in the CPP, FHN may not repurchase common or other equity shares (subject to certain
limited exceptions) without the USTs approval.
|
Banking regulators define minimum capital ratios for bank holding companies and their bank
subsidiaries. Based on the capital rules and definitions prescribed by the banking regulators,
should any depository institutions capital ratios decline below predetermined levels, it would
become subject to a series of increasingly restrictive regulatory actions. The system categorizes
a depository institutions capital position into one of five categories ranging from
well-capitalized to critically under-capitalized. For an institution to qualify as
well-capitalized, Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital, and Leverage capital ratios must be at least 6
percent, 10 percent and 5 percent, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008,
FHN and FTBNA had sufficient capital to qualify as well-capitalized institutions as shown in Note 7 Regulatory Capital.
RISK MANAGEMENT
FHN has an enterprise-wide approach to risk governance, measurement, management, and reporting
including an economic capital allocation process that is tied to risk profiles used to measure
risk-adjusted returns. The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee oversees risk
management governance. Committee membership includes the Chief Executive Officer and other
executive officers of FHN. The Chief Risk Officer oversees reporting for the committee. Risk
management objectives include evaluating risks inherent in business strategies, monitoring proper
balance of risks and returns, and managing risks to minimize the probability of future negative
outcomes. The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee oversees and receives regular
reports from the Credit Risk Management Committee, Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), Capital
Management Committee, Compliance Risk Committee, Operational Risk Committee, and the Executive
Program Governance Forum. The Chief Credit Officer, Executive Vice President Funds Management and
Corporate Treasurer (chairs both ALCO and Capital Management Committee), Senior Vice President
Corporate Compliance, Chief Risk Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Information
Officer chair these committees respectively. Reports regarding Credit,
83
Asset/Liability Management, Market Risk, Capital Management, Compliance, and Operational Risks are
provided to the Credit Policy and Executive Committee, and/or Audit Committee of the Board and to
the full Board.
Risk management practices include key elements such as independent checks and balances, formal
authority limits, policies and procedures, and portfolio management all executed through
experienced personnel. The Internal Audit Department, Credit Risk Assurance Group, Credit Policy
and Regulations Group, and Credit Portfolio Management Group also evaluate risk management
activities. These evaluations are reviewed with management and the Audit Committee, as
appropriate.
The Compensation Committee, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer, EVP Human Resources, and Chief
Credit Officer convene periodically, as required by the U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP), to review and assess key business risks and the relation of those risks to
compensation plans across the company. A comprehensive review was conducted with the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors during third quarter 2009.
MARKET
UNCERTAINTIES AND PROSPECTIVE TRENDS
Given the significant current uncertainties that exist within the housing and credit markets, it is
anticipated that the remainder of 2009 continuing into 2010 will be challenging for FHN. While the
ongoing reduction of mortgage banking operations is expected to significantly decrease sensitivity
to market pricing uncertainty, FHN will continue to be affected by market factors as it addresses
the remaining mortgage loan warehouse and attempts to reduce the remaining servicing portfolio.
Despite the significant reduction of mortgage banking operations, the current economic downturn
could increase borrower defaults resulting in elevated loan loss provision, foreclosure and loan
repurchase obligations, and losses as FHN attempts to reduce the amount of foreclosed assets. As
difficulties in the credit markets persist, FHN will continue to adapt its liquidity management
strategies. Further deterioration of general economic conditions could result in increased credit
costs depending on the length and depth of this market cycle.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in prevailing interest rates will adversely affect
assets, liabilities, capital, income, and/or expense at different times or in different amounts.
ALCO, a committee consisting of senior management that meets regularly, is responsible for
coordinating the financial management of interest rate risk. FHN primarily manages interest rate
risk by structuring the balance sheet to attempt to maintain the desired level of associated
earnings while operating within prudent risk limits and thereby preserving the value of FHNs
capital.
Net interest income and the financial condition of FHN are affected by changes in the level of
market interest rates as the repricing characteristics of loans and other assets do not necessarily
match those of deposits, other borrowings, and capital. When earning assets reprice more quickly
than liabilities, net interest income will benefit in a rising interest rate environment and will
be negatively impacted when interest rates decline. In the case of floating rate assets and
liabilities with similar repricing frequencies, FHN may also be exposed to basis risk which results
from changing spreads between earning and borrowing rates. Generally, when interest rates decline,
Mortgage Banking faces increased prepayment risk associated with MSR.
Due to the third quarter 2008 sale of certain mortgage banking operations, Mortgage Banking revenue
mix was significantly impacted. Through August 2008, Mortgage Banking revenue was primarily
generated by originating, selling, and servicing residential mortgage loans and was highly
sensitive to changes in interest rates due to the direct effect changes in interest rates have on
loan demand. After the 2008 divestiture, Mortgage Banking income was primarily composed of
servicing residential mortgage loans and fair value adjustments to the remaining warehouse. Given
the repositioning of mortgage banking operations, origination activity has been significantly
reduced thereby reducing interest rate risk exposure in periods after the divestiture. In general,
low or declining interest rates typically lead to increased origination fees and profit from the
sale of loans but potentially lower servicing-related income due to the impact of higher loan
prepayments on the value of mortgage servicing assets. Conversely, high or rising interest rates
typically reduce mortgage loan demand and hence income from originations and sales of loans while
servicing-related income may rise due to lower prepayments. Net interest income earned on
warehouse loans held for sale and on swaps and similar derivative instruments used to protect the
value of MSR increases when the yield curve steepens and decreases when the yield curve flattens or
inverts.
Lastly, a steepening yield curve generally has a positive impact on the demand for fixed income
securities and, therefore, Capital Markets revenue. Generally, the effects of a steepening yield
curve on FHNs consolidated pre-tax income are positive, especially when driven by falling short
term rates, benefiting Capital Markets and Mortgage Bankings results.
As a result of the MetLife transaction, mortgage banking origination activity was significantly
reduced in periods after third quarter 2008 as FHN focuses on origination within its regional
banking footprint. Accordingly, the following discussion of pipeline and warehouse related
84
derivatives is primarily applicable to reporting periods occurring through third quarter 2008. In
certain cases, derivative financial instruments are used to aid in managing the exposure of the
balance sheet and related net interest income and noninterest income to changes in interest rates.
As discussed in Critical Accounting Policies, derivative financial instruments are used by mortgage
banking for two purposes. First, forward sales contracts and futures contracts are used to protect
against changes in fair value of the pipeline and mortgage warehouse, primarily used from the time
an interest rate is committed to the customer until the mortgage is sold into the secondary market
due to increases in interest rates. Second, interest rate contracts, forward sales contracts, and
futures contracts, are utilized to protect against MSR prepayment risk that generally accompanies
declining interest rates. As interest rates fall, the value of MSR should decrease and the value
of the servicing hedge should increase. The converse is also true.
Derivative instruments are also used to protect against the risk of loss arising from adverse
changes in the fair value of a portion of Capital Markets securities inventory due to changes in
interest rates. FHN does not use derivative instruments to protect against changes in fair value
of loans or loans held for sale other than the mortgage pipeline, warehouse and certain small
issuer trust preferred loans.
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
ALCO focuses on the funding of assets with liabilities of the appropriate duration, while
mitigating the risk of not meeting unexpected cash needs. The objective of liquidity management is
to ensure the continuous availability of funds to meet the demands of depositors, other creditors,
and borrowers, and the requirements of ongoing operations. This objective is met by maintaining
liquid assets in the form of trading securities and securities available for sale, growing core
deposits, and the repayment of loans. ALCO is responsible for managing these needs by taking into
account the marketability of assets; the sources, stability and availability of funding; and the
level of unfunded commitments. Subject to market conditions and compliance with applicable
regulatory requirements from time to time, funds are available from a number of sources, including
core deposits, the securities available for sale portfolio, the Federal Reserve Banks, including
access to Federal Reserve Bank programs such as the Term Auction Facility (TAF), the Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB), availability to the overnight and term Federal Funds markets, and dealer and
commercial customer repurchase agreements.
Core deposits are a significant source of funding and have been a stable source of liquidity for
banks. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures these deposits to the extent authorized
by law. Generally, these limits were temporarily increased to $250 thousand per account owner
through 2013. Total loans, excluding loans held for sale and real estate loans pledged against
other collateralized borrowings, to core deposits ratio was 138 percent in third quarter 2009 and
170 percent in third quarter 2008. Should loan growth exceed core deposit growth, alternative
sources of funding loan growth may be necessary in order to maintain an adequate liquidity
position. The ratio is expected to continue to decline as the national loan portfolios decrease.
In 2005, FTBNA established a bank note program providing additional liquidity of $5.0 billion. On
September 30, 2009, $.9 billion was outstanding through the bank note program with $.1 billion
scheduled to mature in the fourth quarter of 2009. During 2008 and continuing into 2009, market
and other conditions have been such that FTBNA has not been able to utilize the bank note program,
and instead has obtained less credit sensitive sources of funding including secured sources such as
the TAF program. FTBNA expects that its inability to use the bank note program will continue for
some time, and cannot predict when that inability will end.
FHN and FTBNA have the ability to generate liquidity by issuing preferred or common equity or
incurring other debt subject to market conditions and compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements from time to time. FHN also evaluates alternative sources of funding, including loan
sales, syndications, and FHLB borrowings in its management of liquidity.
Parent company liquidity is maintained by cash flows stemming from dividends and interest payments
collected from subsidiaries along with net proceeds from stock sales through employee plans, which
represent the primary sources of funds to pay cash dividends to shareholders and interest to debt
holders. The amount paid to the parent company through FTBNA common dividends is managed as part
of FHNs overall cash management process, subject to applicable regulatory restrictions described
in the next paragraph. As discussed above, the parent company also has the ability to enhance its
liquidity position by raising equity or incurring debt subject to market conditions and compliance
with applicable regulatory requirements from time to time.
Certain regulatory restrictions exist regarding the ability of FTBNA to transfer funds to FHN in
the form of cash, common dividends, loans, or advances. At any given time, the pertinent portions
of those regulatory restrictions allow FTBNA to declare preferred or common dividends without prior
regulatory approval in an amount equal to FTBNAs retained net income for the two most recent
completed years plus the current year to date. For any period, FTBNAs retained net income
generally is equal to FTBNAs regulatory net income reduced by the preferred and common dividends
declared by FTBNA. Excess dividends in either of the two most recent completed years may be offset
with available retained net income in the two years immediately preceding it. Applying the
applicable rules, FTBNAs total amount available for dividends was negative $416 million at
September 30, 2009. Earnings (or losses) and dividends declared during 2009 will change the amount
available during 2009 until December 31.
85
FTBNA has requested approval from the OCC to declare and pay dividends on its preferred stock
outstanding payable in January 2010. FTBNA has not requested approval to pay common dividends to
its sole common stockholder, FHN. Although FHN has funds available for dividends even without
FTBNA dividends, availability of funds is not the sole factor considered by FHNs Board in deciding
whether to declare a dividend of any particular size; the Board also must consider FHNs current
and prospective capital, liquidity and other needs. Under the terms of the CPP, FHN is not
permitted to increase its cash common dividend rate for a period of three years from the date of
issuance without permission of the Treasury. At the time of the preferred share and common stock
warrant issuance, FHN did not pay a common cash dividend.
On October 20, 2009, the Board declared a dividend in shares of common stock at a rate of 1.4971%
to be distributed on January 2, 2010 to shareholders of record on December 11, 2009. The Board
intends to reinstate a cash dividend at an appropriate and prudent level once earnings and other
conditions improve sufficiently, consistent with legal, regulatory, CPP, and other constraints.
The Board has also approved the payment of the 5% (annualized) dividend on the CPP preferred
payable on November 16, 2009.
The Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows provide information on cash flows from
operating, investing, and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and
2008. In 2009, positive cash flows from investing and operating activities were exceeded by
negative cash flows from financing activities, primarily as a result of deceases in long-term debt
and short-term borrowings. The decline in long-term debt and short-term borrowings is primarily a
result of reduced funding requirements due to the contracting balance sheet. In 2009, net cash
provided by investing and operating activities were $2.7 billion, and $.7 billion, respectively,
which was more than offset by $3.7 billion negative cash flows from financing activities.
Positive cash flows from investing activities were primarily affected by a $2.1 billion decrease in
loans attributable to the wind-down of the national construction and consumer portfolios. Cash
provided by operating activities was $.7 billion compared with $3.0 billion in 2008. Net cash
provided by operating activities in 2008 resulted from a significant decline in loans held for sale
due to the sale of national mortgage origination offices. Net cash provided by investing
activities resulted from a large decline in the loan portfolio as FHN continues to wind down the
national portfolios. Negative cash flows from financing activities were due to a reduction of
funding from short-term borrowings and also maturities on long-term debt and is consistent with
balance sheet contraction.
Negative cash flows in 2008 were attributable to financing activities largely due to a decline in
deposits of $2.8 billion. This decline was due to increased competition for deposits, but also
resulted from the loss of escrow deposits upon completion of the sale of the national mortgage
origination and servicing platforms in third quarter 2008. Additionally, long-term debt maturities
were $1.4 billion which also impacted negative cash flows. Positive cash flows from operating
activities were $2.9 billion and primarily resulted from a decline in loans held for sale. The
mortgage warehouse declined significantly in 2008 as FHN discontinued originating mortgage loans
through the national platform. Cash flows from investing activities in 2008 were $.5 billion and
primarily relate to a decline in the loan portfolio and a slight reduction in the available for
sale securities portfolio.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Contractual Obligations
First Horizon Home Loans, the former mortgage banking division of FHN, originated conventional
conforming and federally insured single-family residential mortgage loans. Likewise, FTN Financial
Capital Assets Corporation purchases the same types of loans from customers. Substantially all of
these mortgage loans were exchanged for securities, which are issued through investors, including
government sponsored enterprises (GSE), such as Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) for
federally insured loans and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) for conventional loans, and then sold in the secondary markets. Each
GSE has specific guidelines and criteria for sellers and servicers of loans backing their
respective securities. Many private investors were also active in the secondary market as issuers
and investors. The risk of credit loss with regard to the principal amount of the loans sold was
generally transferred to investors upon sale to the secondary market. To the extent that
transferred loans were subsequently determined not to meet the agreed upon qualifications or
criteria, the purchaser had the right to return those loans to FHN. In addition, certain mortgage
loans were sold to investors with limited or full recourse in the event of mortgage foreclosure
(refer to discussion of foreclosure reserves under Critical Accounting Policies). After sale,
these loans were not reflected on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition.
FHNs use of government agencies as an efficient outlet for mortgage loan production was an
essential source of liquidity for FHN and other participants in the housing industry in recent
years. The use of origination and subsequent sale or securitization of these loans to government
agencies has significantly declined due to FHNs sale of national mortgage origination offices in
third quarter 2008. During third quarter 2008, approximately $4.2 billion of conventional and
federally insured mortgage loans were securitized and sold by FHN through these investors. There
were no sales or securitizations of mortgage loans to government agencies in third quarter 2009.
86
Historically, certain of FHNs originated loans, including non-conforming first-lien mortgages,
second-lien mortgages and HELOC did not conform to the requirements for sale or securitization
through government agencies. FHN pooled and securitized these non-conforming loans in proprietary
transactions. After securitization and sale, these loans were not reflected on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Condition. These transactions, which were conducted through single-purpose
business trusts, were an efficient way for FHN to monetize these assets. On September 30, 2009 and
2008, the outstanding principal amount of loans in these off-balance sheet business trusts was
$19.3 billion and $23.0 billion, respectively. FHN has substantially reduced its origination of
these loans in response to disruptions in the credit markets and did not execute a securitization
of these loans in 2008 and through the third quarter of 2009. Given the historical significance of
FHNs origination of non-conforming loans, the use of single-purpose business trusts to securitize
these loans was an important source of liquidity to FHN. See Note 13 Loan Sales and
Securitizations for additional information.
FHN has also sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages without recourse through whole loan sales. In
third quarter 2009, FHN settled a substantial portion of its repurchase obligations through an
agreement with the primary purchaser of HELOC and second lien loans that were previously
transferred through whole loan sales. This settlement included the transfer of retained servicing
rights associated with the applicable prior second lien and HELOC loan sales. On September 30,
2008, the outstanding principal balance of these HELOC and second-lien mortgages was $1.0 billion
and $2.0 billion, respectively. FHN does not guarantee the receipt of the scheduled principal and
interest payments on the underlying loans but does have an obligation to repurchase the loans
excluded from the above settlement for which there is a breach of warranties provided to the
buyers. The remaining repurchase obligation is minimal reflecting the settlement discussed above.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of FHN has agreements with several providers of private mortgage
insurance whereby the subsidiary has agreed to accept insurance risk for specified loss corridors
for loans originated in each contract year in exchange for a portion of the private mortgage
insurance premiums paid by borrowers (i.e., reinsurance arrangements). The loss corridors vary for
each primary insurer for each contract year. No new reinsurance arrangements have been initiated
after 2008. In third quarter 2009, FHN agreed to settle certain of its reinsurance obligations
with a primary insurer, resulting in a decrease in the reserve balance and the associated trust
assets. As of September 30, 2009, FHN has reserved $44.5 million for its estimated liability under
the reinsurance arrangements. In accordance with the terms of the contracts with the primary
insurers, as of September 30, 2009, FHN has placed $46.9 million of prior premium collections in
trust for payment of claims arising under the reinsurance arrangements.
FHN has various other financial obligations, which may require future cash payments. Purchase
obligations represent obligations under agreements to purchase goods or services that are
enforceable and legally binding on FHN and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or
minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions, and the
approximate timing of the transaction. In addition, FHN enters into commitments to extend credit
to borrowers, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of
credit. These commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these
commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Capital markets buys and sells various types of securities for its customers. When these
securities settle on a delayed basis, they are considered forward contracts. Securities inventory
positions are generally procured for distribution to customers by the sales staff, and ALCO
policies and guidelines have been established with the objective of limiting the risk in managing
this inventory.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The capital management objectives of FHN are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks
inherent in FHNs businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards and to
assure ready access to the capital markets. Managements Capital Management committee, chaired by
the Executive Vice President of Funds Management and Corporate Treasurer, is responsible for
capital management oversight and provides a forum for addressing management issues related to
capital adequacy. The committee reviews sources and uses of capital, key capital ratios, segment
economic capital allocation methodologies, and other factors in monitoring and managing current
capital levels, as well as potential future sources and uses of capital. The committee also
recommends capital management policies, which are submitted for approval to the Enterprise-wide
Risk/Return Management Committee and the Board.
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and
systems or from external events. This risk is inherent in all businesses. Management,
measurement, and reporting of operational risk are overseen by the Operational Risk Committee,
which is chaired by the Chief Risk Officer. Key representatives from the business segments, legal,
risk management, information technology risk, corporate real estate, employee services, records
management, bank operations, funds management, and insurance are represented on the committee.
Subcommittees manage and report on business continuity planning, information technology risk,
insurance, records
87
management, customer complaint, and reputation risks. Summary reports of the committees
activities and decisions are provided to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee.
Emphasis is dedicated to refinement of processes and tools to aid in measuring and managing
material operational risks and providing for a culture of awareness and accountability.
COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss, or loss to
reputation as a result of failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory
organization standards, and codes of conduct applicable to banking activities. Management,
measurement, and reporting of compliance risk are overseen by the Compliance Risk Committee, which
is chaired by the SVP of Corporate Compliance. Key executives from the business segments, legal,
risk management, and service functions are represented on the committee. Summary reports of the
committees activities and decisions are provided to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management
Committee, and to the Audit Committee of the Board, as applicable. Reports include the status of
regulatory activities, internal compliance program initiatives, and evaluation of emerging
compliance risk areas.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in a borrower or counterpartys ability to
meet its financial obligations under agreed upon terms. FHN is subject to credit risk in lending,
trading, investing, liquidity/funding, and asset management activities. The nature and amount of
credit risk depends on the types of transactions, the structure of those transactions and the
parties involved. In general, credit risk is incidental to trading, liquidity/funding and asset
management activities, while it is central to the profit strategy in lending. As a result, the
majority of credit risk is associated with lending activities.
FHN assesses and manages credit risk through a series of policies, processes, measurement systems,
and controls. The Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC) is responsible for overseeing the
management of existing and emerging credit risks in the company within the broad risk tolerances
established by the Board of Directors.
The Credit Risk Management function, led by the Chief Credit Officer, provides strategic and
tactical credit leadership by maintaining policies, overseeing credit approval and servicing, and
managing portfolio composition and performance.
A series of regularly scheduled portfolio review meetings are in place to provide oversight
regarding the accuracy of credit risk grading and the adequacy of commercial credit servicing. A
series of watch list meetings are in place to oversee the management of emerging potential problem
commercial assets. The Credit Risk Management function assesses the portfolio trends and the
results of these meetings and utilizes this information to inform management regarding the current
state of credit quality as part of the estimation process for determining the allowance for loan
losses.
All of the above activities are subject to independent review by FHNs Credit Risk Assurance Group,
which encompasses both Credit Review and Credit Quality Control functions. The EVP of Credit Risk
Assurance is appointed by and reports to the Credit Policy & Executive Committee of the Board.
Credit Risk Assurance is charged with providing the Board and executive management with
independent, objective, and timely assessments of FHNs portfolio quality, adequacy of credit
policies, and credit risk management processes.
Management strives to identify potential problem loans and nonperforming loans early enough to
correct the deficiencies and prevent further credit deterioration. It is managements objective
that both charge-offs and asset write-downs are recorded promptly, based on managements
assessments of current collateral values and the borrowers ability to repay.
FHN has a significant concentration of loans secured by residential real estate (51 percent of
total loans) primarily in three portfolios. The retail real estate residential portfolio including
real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings (45 percent of total loans) was
primarily comprised of home equity lines and loans. While this portfolio has been stressed by the
downturn in the housing market and rising unemployment, it contains loans extended to strong
borrowers with high credit scores and is geographically diversified. The Residential CRE portfolio
(4 percent of total loans) has also been negatively impacted by the housing industry downturn as
builder liquidity has been severely stressed. The OTC portfolio (2 percent of total loans) has
been negatively impacted by the downturn in the housing industry, certain discontinued product
types, and the decreased availability of permanent mortgage financing.
As of September 30, 2009, FHN had bank-related and trust preferred loans (including loans to banks
and insurance-related businesses) totaling $.7 billion (4 percent of total loans) that are included
within the Commercial, Financial, and Industrial portfolio. Due to higher credit losses
experienced throughout the financial services industry and the limited availability of market
liquidity, these loans have experienced some stress during the economic downturn.
88
On September 30, 2009, FHN did not have any concentrations of Commercial, Financial, and Industrial
loans in any single industry of 10 percent or more of total loans.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
FHNs accounting policies are fundamental to understanding managements discussion and analysis of
results of operations and financial condition. The consolidated condensed financial statements of
FHN are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. The
preparation of the financial statements requires management to make certain judgments and
assumptions in determining accounting estimates. Accounting estimates are considered critical if
(a) the estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain
at the time the accounting estimate was made, and (b) different estimates reasonably could have
been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate are reasonably likely to
occur from period to period, that would have a material impact on the presentation of FHNs
financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.
It is managements practice to discuss critical accounting policies with the Board of Directors
Audit Committee including the development, selection and disclosure of the critical accounting
estimates. Management believes the following critical accounting policies are both important to
the portrayal of the companys financial condition and results of operations and require subjective
or complex judgments. These judgments about critical accounting estimates are based on information
available as of the date of the financial statements.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Managements policy is to maintain the ALLL at a level sufficient to absorb estimated probable
incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management performs periodic and systematic detailed
reviews of its loan portfolio to identify trends and to assess the overall collectibility of the
loan portfolio. Accounting standards require that loan losses be recorded when management
determines it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. Management believes the accounting estimate related to the ALLL is a
critical accounting estimate because: changes in it can materially affect the provision for loan
losses and net income, it requires management to predict borrowers likelihood or capacity to
repay, and it requires management to distinguish between losses incurred as of a balance sheet date
and losses expected to be incurred in the future. Accordingly, this is a highly subjective process
and requires significant judgment since it is often difficult to determine when specific loss
events may actually occur. The ALLL is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries
and is decreased by charged-off loans. Principal loan amounts are charged off against the ALLL in
the period in which the loan or any portion of the loan is deemed to be uncollectible. This
critical accounting estimate applies to all of FHNs business line segments. The Credit Policy and
Executive Committee of FHNs board of directors reviews quarterly the level of the ALLL.
FHNs methodology for estimating the ALLL is not only critical to the accounting estimate, but to
the credit risk management function as well. Key components of the estimation process are as
follows: (1) commercial loans determined by management to be individually impaired loans are
evaluated individually and specific reserves are determined based on the difference between the
outstanding loan amount and the estimated net realizable value of the collateral (if collateral
dependent) or the present value of expected future cash flows; (2) individual commercial loans not
considered to be individually impaired are segmented based on similar credit risk characteristics
and evaluated on a pool basis; (3) reserve rates for the commercial segment are calculated based on
historical net charge-offs and are subject to adjustment by management to reflect current events,
trends, and conditions (including economic considerations and trends); (4) managements estimate of
probable incurred losses reflects the reserve rate applied against the balance of loans in the
commercial segment of the loan portfolio; (5) retail loans are segmented based on loan type; (6)
reserve amounts for each retail portfolio segment are calculated using analytical models based on
net loss experience and are subject to adjustment by management to reflect current events, trends,
and conditions (including economic considerations and trends); and (7) the reserve amount for each
retail portfolio segment reflects managements estimate of probable incurred losses in the retail
segment of the loan portfolio.
As previously disclosed beginning in the second quarter of 2009, management developed and utilized
an Average Loss Rate Model (ALR) for establishment of commercial portfolio reserve rates. ALR is
a grade migration based approach that allows for robust segmentation and dynamic time period
consideration. In comparison with the prior commercial reserve rate establishment, ALR is more
sensitive to current portfolio conditions and provides management with additional detailed analysis
into historical portfolio net loss experience. ALR also uses the current assigned commercial
credit grades ranging from 1 to 16 thereby eliminating the previous need to back convert to the
historical
89
grade range of 1 to 10 for the proper assignment of reserves. Consistent with the preceding
approach, these reserve rates are then subject to management adjustment to reflect current events,
trends and conditions (including economic considerations and trends) that affect the asset quality
of the commercial loan portfolio.
For commercial loans, reserves are established using historical net loss factors by grade level,
loan product, and business segment. Relationship managers risk rate each loan using grades that
reflect both the probability of default and estimated loss severity in the event of default.
Portfolio reviews are conducted to provide independent oversight of risk grading decisions for
larger credits. Loans with emerging weaknesses receive increased oversight through our Watch
List process. For new Watch List loans, senior credit management reviews risk grade
appropriateness and action plans. After initial identification, relationship managers prepare
regular updates for review and discussion by more senior business line and credit officers. This
oversight is intended to bring consistent grading and allow timely identification of loans that
need to be further downgraded or placed on nonaccrual status. When a loan becomes classified, the
asset generally transfers to the specialists in our Loan Rehab and Recovery group where the
accounts receive more detailed monitoring; at this time, new appraisals are typically ordered for
real estate collateral dependent credits. Loans are placed on non-accrual if it becomes evident
that full collection of principal and interest is at risk or if the loans become 90 days or more
past due.
Generally, classified commercial non-accrual loans over $1 million are deemed to be individually
impaired and are assessed for impairment measurement. For impaired assets viewed as collateral
dependent, fair value estimates are obtained from a recently received and reviewed appraisal.
Appraised values are adjusted down for costs associated with asset disposal and for our estimate of
any further deterioration in values since the most recent appraisal. Upon the determination of
impairment, FHN charges off the full difference between book value and our best estimate of the
assets net realizable value
.
As of September 30, 2009, the total amount of individually impaired
commercial loans was $604.0 million; $559.8 million of these loans are carried at NRV and do not
carry reserves.
For OTC real estate construction loans, reserve levels are established based on portfolio modeling
and regular portfolio reviews. OTC loans that reach 90 days past due are placed on nonaccrual. A
new appraisal is ordered for loans that reach 90 days past due or are classified as substandard
during the regular portfolio review. Loans are initially written down to current appraised value.
Periodically, loans are assessed for further charge down.
For home equity loans and lines, reserve levels are established through the use of segmented
roll-rate models. Loans are classified substandard at 90 days delinquent. Our collateral position
is assessed prior to the asset becoming 180 days delinquent. If the value does not support
foreclosure, balances are charged-off and other avenues of recovery are pursued. If the value
supports foreclosure, the loan is charged down to net realizable value and is placed on non-accrual
status. When collateral is taken to OREO, the asset is assessed for further write down relative to
appraised value.
FHN believes that the critical assumptions underlying the accounting estimate made by management
include: (1) the commercial loan portfolio has been properly risk graded based on information about
borrowers in specific industries and specific issues with respect to single borrowers; (2) borrower
specific information made available to FHN is current and accurate; (3) the loan portfolio has been
segmented properly and individual loans have similar credit risk characteristics and will behave
similarly; (4) known significant loss events that have occurred were considered by management at
the time of assessing the adequacy of the ALLL; (5) the adjustments for economic conditions
utilized in the allowance for loan losses estimate are used as a measure of actual incurred losses;
(6) the period of history used for historical loss factors is indicative of the current
environment; and (7) the reserve rates, as well as other adjustments estimated by management for
current events, trends, and conditions, utilized in the process reflect an estimate of losses that
have been incurred as of the date of the financial statements.
While management uses the best information available to establish the ALLL, future adjustments to
the ALLL and methodology may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ substantially from
the assumptions used in making the estimates or, if required by regulators, based upon information
at the time of their examinations. Such adjustments to original estimates, as necessary, are made
in the period in which these factors and other relevant considerations indicate that loss levels
vary from previous estimates.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS AND OTHER RELATED RETAINED INTERESTS
When FHN sold mortgage loans in the secondary market to investors, it generally retained the right
to service the loans sold in exchange for a servicing fee that is collected over the life of the
loan as the payments are received from the borrower. An amount was capitalized as MSR on the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition at current fair value. The changes in fair value of
MSR are included as a component of Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income.
90
MSR Estimated Fair Value
FHN has elected fair value accounting for all classes of mortgage servicing rights. The fair value
of MSR typically rises as market interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates
decrease; however, the extent to which this occurs depends in part on (1) the magnitude of changes
in market interest rates, and (2) the differential between the then current market interest rates
for mortgage loans and the mortgage interest rates included in the mortgage-servicing portfolio.
Since sales of MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of
the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining
the fair value of MSR. As such, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate
the fair value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant
risk characteristics of MSR, such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age
(new, seasoned, moderate), agency type, and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that
it believes are comparable to those used by other participants in the mortgage banking business and
reviews estimated fair values and assumptions with third-party brokers and other service providers
on a quarterly basis. FHN also compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions to recent
market activity and against its own experience.
Estimating the cash flow components of net servicing income from the loan and the resultant fair
value of the MSR requires FHN to make several critical assumptions based upon current market and
loan production data.
Prepayment Speeds:
Generally, when market interest rates decline and other factors
favorable to prepayments occur, there is a corresponding increase in prepayments as customers
refinance existing mortgages under more favorable interest rate terms. When a mortgage loan is
prepaid the anticipated cash flows associated with servicing that loan are terminated, resulting in
a reduction of the fair value of the capitalized MSR. To the extent that actual borrower
prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed
in the model does not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment
model could fail to accurately predict mortgage prepayments and could result in significant
earnings volatility. To estimate prepayment speeds, FHN utilizes a third-party prepayment model,
which is based upon statistically derived data linked to certain key principal indicators involving
historical borrower prepayment activity associated with mortgage loans in the secondary market,
current market interest rates, and other factors. For purposes of model valuation, estimates are
made for each product type within the MSR portfolio on a monthly basis.
Table 11 - Mortgage Banking Prepayment Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Prepayment speeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Estimated*
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
* Estimated prepayment speeds represent monthly average prepayment speed
estimates for each of the periods presented.
Discount Rate:
Represents the rate at which expected cash flows are discounted to
arrive at the net present value of servicing income. Discount rates will change with market
conditions (i.e., supply vs. demand) and be reflective of the yields expected to be earned by
market participants investing in MSR.
Cost to Service:
Expected costs to service are estimated based upon the incremental costs
that a market participant would use in evaluating the potential acquisition of MSR.
Float Income:
Estimated float income is driven by expected float balances (principal,
interest and escrow payments that are held pending remittance to the investor or other third party)
and current market interest rates, including the thirty-day London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
and five-year swap interest rates, which are updated on a monthly basis for purposes of estimating
the fair value of MSR.
FHN engages in a process referred to as price discovery on a quarterly basis to assess the
reasonableness of the estimated fair value of MSR. Price discovery is conducted through a process
of obtaining the following information: (a) quarterly informal (and an annual formal) valuation of
the servicing portfolio by prominent independent mortgage-servicing brokers, and (b) a collection
of surveys and benchmarking data made available by independent third parties that include peer
participants in the mortgage banking business. Although there is no single source of market
information that can be relied upon to assess the fair value of MSR, FHN reviews all information
obtained during price discovery to determine whether the estimated fair value of MSR is reasonable
when compared to market information. On September 30, 2009, and 2008, FHN determined that its MSR
valuations and assumptions were reasonable based on the price discovery process.
91
The MSR Hedging Committee reviews the overall assessment of the estimated fair value of MSR monthly
and is responsible for approving the critical assumptions used by management to determine the
estimated fair value of FHNs MSR. In addition, this committee reviews the source of significant
changes to the MSR carrying value each quarter and is responsible for current hedges and approving
hedging strategies.
Hedging the Fair Value of MSR
FHN enters into financial agreements to hedge MSR in order to minimize the effects of loss in value
of MSR associated with increased prepayment activity that generally results from declining interest
rates. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of the MSR generally will increase while
the value of the hedge instruments will decline. Specifically, FHN enters into interest rate
contracts (including swaps, swaptions and mortgage forward sales contracts) to hedge against the
effects of changes in fair value of its MSR. Substantially all capitalized MSR are hedged. The
hedges are economic hedges only, and are terminated and reestablished as needed to respond to
changes in market conditions. Changes in the value of the hedges are recognized as a component of
net servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income. Successful economic hedging will help
minimize earnings volatility that may result from carrying MSR at fair value. Subsequent to the
sale of certain mortgage banking operations to MetLife, FHN determines the fair value of the
derivatives used to hedge MSR (and excess interests as discussed below) using quoted prices for
identical instruments in valuing forwards and using inputs observed in active markets for similar
instruments with typical inputs including the LIBOR curve, option volatility and option skew in
valuing swaps and swaptions. Prior to the MetLife transaction, fair values of these derivatives
were obtained through proprietary pricing models which were compared to market value quotes
received from third party broker-dealers in the derivative markets.
In conjunction with the repositioning of its mortgage banking operations, FHN no longer retains
servicing on the loans it sells. In prior periods, FHN generally experienced increased loan
origination and production in periods of low interest rates which resulted in the capitalization of
new MSR associated with new production. This provided for a natural hedge in the
mortgage-banking business cycle. New production and origination did not prevent FHN from
recognizing losses due to reduction in carrying value of existing servicing rights as a result of
prepayments; rather, the new production volume resulted in loan origination fees and the
capitalization of MSR as a component of realized gains related to the sale of such loans in the
secondary market, thus the natural hedge, which tended to offset a portion of the reduction in MSR
carrying value during a period of low interest rates. In a period of increased borrower
prepayments, these losses could have been significantly offset by a strong replenishment rate and
strong net margins on new loan originations. To the extent that First Horizon Home Loans was
unable to maintain a strong replenishment rate, or in the event that the net margin on new loan
originations declined from historical experience, the value of the natural hedge might have
diminished, thereby significantly impacting the results of operations in a period of increased
borrower prepayments.
FHN does not specifically hedge the change in fair value of MSR attributed to other risks,
including unanticipated prepayments (representing the difference between actual prepayment
experience and estimated prepayments derived from the model, as described above), discount rates,
cost to service, and other factors. To the extent that these other factors result in changes to
the fair value of MSR, FHN experiences volatility in current earnings due to the fact that these
risks are not currently hedged.
Excess Interest (Interest-Only Strips) Fair Value Residential Mortgage Loans
In certain cases, when FHN sold mortgage loans in the secondary market, it retained an interest in
the mortgage loans sold primarily through excess interest. These financial assets represent rights
to receive earnings from serviced assets that exceed contractually specified servicing fees and are
legally separable from the base servicing rights. Consistent with MSR, the fair value of excess
interest typically rises as market interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates
decrease. Additionally, similar to MSR, the market for excess interest is limited, and the precise
terms of transactions involving excess interest are typically not readily available. Accordingly,
FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its excess
interest.
Estimating the cash flow components and the resultant fair value of the excess interest requires
FHN to make certain critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data. The
primary critical assumptions used by FHN to estimate the fair value of excess interest include
prepayment speeds and discount rates, as discussed above. FHNs excess interest is included as a
component of trading securities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition, with
realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of mortgage
banking income on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
Hedging the Fair Value of Excess Interest
FHN utilizes derivatives (including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) that
change in value inversely to the movement of interest rates to protect the value of its excess
interest as an economic hedge. Realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with the change
in fair value of derivatives used in the economic hedge of excess interest are included in current
earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income. Excess
interest is included in trading securities with changes in fair value recognized currently in
earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income.
92
The extent to which the change in fair value of excess interest is offset by the change in fair
value of the derivatives used to hedge this asset depends primarily on the hedge coverage ratio
maintained by FHN. Also, as noted above, to the extent that actual borrower prepayments do not
react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed in the model does
not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment model could fail to
accurately predict mortgage prepayments, which could significantly impact FHNs ability to
effectively hedge certain components of the change in fair value of excess interest and could
result in significant earnings volatility.
PIPELINE AND WAREHOUSE
As a result of the MetLife transaction, mortgage banking origination activity was significantly
reduced in periods after third quarter 2008 as FHN focuses on origination within its regional
banking footprint. Accordingly, the following discussion of pipeline and warehouse related
derivatives is primarily applicable to reporting periods in 2008.
During the period of loan origination and prior to the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary
market, FHN has exposure to mortgage loans that are in the mortgage pipeline and the mortgage
warehouse. The mortgage pipeline consists of loan applications that have been received, but have
not yet closed as loans. Pipeline loans are either floating or locked. A floating pipeline
loan is one on which an interest rate has not been locked by the borrower. A locked pipeline loan
is one on which the potential borrower has set the interest rate for the loan by entering into an
interest rate lock commitment. Once a mortgage loan is closed and funded, it is included within
the mortgage warehouse, or the inventory of mortgage loans that are awaiting sale and delivery
into the secondary market.
Interest rate lock commitments are derivatives pursuant to the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 815-10-45) and are therefore recorded at estimates of
fair value. Effective January 1, 2008, FHN applied the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings (SAB No. 109) prospectively
for derivative loan commitments issued or modified after that date. SAB No. 109 requires inclusion
of expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities in the fair value
measurement of a written loan commitment. Also on January 1, 2008, FHN adopted the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification Topic regarding Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820-10-50),
which affected the valuation of interest rate lock commitments previously measured under the
guidance of ASC 815-10-45.
On January 1, 2008, FHN adopted FASB Accounting Standards Codification for Financial Instruments
(ASC 825-10-50) regarding the fair value election for financial instruments. Prior to adoption of
ASC 825-10-50, all warehouse loans were carried at the lower of cost or market, where carrying
value was adjusted for successful hedging under applicable accounting requirements (ASC 815-10-45)
and the comparison of carrying value to market was performed for aggregate loan pools. Upon
adoption of ASC 825-10-50, FHN elected to prospectively account for substantially all of its
mortgage loan warehouse products at fair value upon origination and correspondingly discontinued
the application of ASC 815-10-45 hedging relationships for these new originations.
The fair value of interest rate lock commitments and the fair value of warehouse loans are impacted
principally by changes in interest rates, but also by changes in borrowers credit, and changes in
profit margins required by investors for perceived risks (i.e., liquidity). FHN does not hedge
against credit and liquidity risk in the pipeline or warehouse. Third party models are used to
manage the interest rate risk.
In conjunction with the adoption of a revision to ASC 820-10-50, in first quarter 2009 FHN revised
its methodology for determining the fair value of certain loans within its mortgage warehouse. FHN
now determines the fair value of the applicable loans using a discounted cash flow model using
observable inputs, including current mortgage rates for similar products, with adjustments for
differences in loan characteristics reflected in the models discount rates. Upon implementation,
this change in methodology had a minimal effect on the valuation of the applicable loans. For all
other loans held in the warehouse (and in prior periods for the loans converted to the discounted
cash flow methodology), the fair value of loans whose principal market is the securitization market
is based on recent security trade prices for similar product with a similar delivery date, with
necessary pricing adjustments to convert the security price to a loan price. Loans whose principal
market is the whole loan market are priced based on recent observable whole loan trade prices or
published third party bid prices for similar product, with necessary pricing adjustments to reflect
differences in loan characteristics. Typical adjustments to security prices for whole loan prices
include adding the value of MSR to the security price or to the whole loan price if the price is
servicing retained, adjusting for interest in excess of (or less than) the required coupon or note
rate, adjustments to reflect differences in the characteristics of the loans being valued as
compared to the collateral of the security or the loan characteristics in the benchmark whole loan
trade, adding interest carry, reflecting the recourse obligation that will remain after sale, and
adjusting for changes in market liquidity or interest rates if the benchmark security or loan price
is not current. Additionally, loans that are delinquent or otherwise significantly aged are
discounted to reflect the less marketable nature of these loans.
93
The fair value of FHNs warehouse (first-lien mortgage loans held for sale) changes with
fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into
the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest
rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, FHN entered
into forward sales contracts and futures contracts to provide an economic hedge against those
changes in fair value on a significant portion of the warehouse. These derivatives are recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of the gain or
loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.
Interest rate lock commitments generally have a term of up to 60 days before the closing of the
loan. During this period, the value of the lock changes with changes in interest rates. The
interest rate lock commitment does not bind the potential borrower to entering into the loan, nor
does it guarantee that FHN will approve the potential borrower for the loan. Therefore, when
determining fair value, FHN makes estimates of expected fallout (locked pipeline loans not
expected to close), using models, which consider cumulative historical fallout rates and other
factors. Fallout can occur for a variety of reasons including falling rate environments when a
borrower will abandon an interest rate lock commitment at one lender and enter into a new lower
interest rate lock commitment at another, when a borrower is not approved as an acceptable credit
by the lender, or for a variety of other non-economic reasons. Changes in the fair value of
interest rate lock commitments are recorded in current earnings as gain or loss on the sale of
loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.
Because interest rate lock commitments are derivatives, they do not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment.. However, FHN economically hedges the risk of changing interest rates by entering into
forward sales and futures contracts. The extent to which FHN is able to economically hedge changes
in the mortgage pipeline depended largely on the hedge coverage ratio that was maintained relative
to mortgage loans in the pipeline. The hedge coverage ratio could change significantly due to
changes in market interest rates and the associated forward commitment prices for sales of mortgage
loans in the secondary market. Increases or decreases in the hedge coverage ratio could result in
significant earnings volatility to FHN.
Due to the reduced level of origination activity after the sale of national origination offices to
MetLife, interest rate commitments are immaterial as of September 30, 2009. For the period ended
September 30, 2008, the valuation model utilized to estimate the fair value of loan applications
locked recognizes the full fair value of the ultimate loan adjusted for estimated fallout and
estimated cost assumptions a market participant would use to convert the lock into a loan. The
fair value of interest rate lock commitments as of September 30, 2008 was $12.5 million.
FORECLOSURE AND REPURCHASE RESERVES
For many years FHN originated loans, primarily first and second lien home loans, with the intention
of selling them. Sometimes the loans were sold with full or limited recourse, but much more often
the loans were sold without recourse. For loans sold with recourse, FHN has indemnity and
repurchase exposure if the loans default. For loans sold without recourse, FHN has repurchase
exposure primarily for defaults occurring within a specified period following the sale, and for
claims that FHN breached its representations and warranties made to the purchasers at the time of
sale.
FHN has sold certain agency mortgage loans with full recourse under agreements to repurchase the
loans upon default. Loans sold with full recourse generally include mortgage loans sold to
investors in the secondary market which are uninsurable under government guaranteed mortgage loan
programs due to issues associated with underwriting activities, documentation, or other concerns.
For mortgage insured single-family residential loans, in the event of borrower nonperformance, FHN
would assume losses to the extent they exceed the value of the collateral and private mortgage
insurance, FHA insurance, or VA guaranty. On September 30, 2009 and 2008, FHN had single-family
residential loans with outstanding balances of $71.6 million and $83.4 million, respectively, that
were serviced on a full recourse basis.
Loans sold with limited recourse include loans sold under government guaranteed mortgage loan
programs including the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Veterans Administration (VA). FHN
continues to absorb losses due to uncollected interest and foreclosure costs and/or limited risk of
credit losses in the event of foreclosure of the mortgage loan sold. Generally, the amount of
recourse liability in the event of foreclosure is determined based upon the respective government
program and/or the sale or disposal of the foreclosed property collateralizing the mortgage loan.
Another instance of limited recourse is the VA/No bid. In this case, the VA guarantee is limited
and FHN may be required to fund any deficiency in excess of the VA guarantee if the loan goes to
foreclosure. On September 30, 2009 and 2008, the outstanding principal balance of loans sold with
limited recourse arrangements where some portion of the principal is at risk and serviced by FHN
was $3.3 billion at the end of both periods. Additionally, on September 30, 2009 and 2008, $1.1
billion and $.7 billion, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding which were sold under
limited recourse arrangements where the risk is limited to interest and servicing advances.
FHN has various claims outstanding with government agencies and private investors for cure of loan
defects, such as missing title insurance, and for repurchase and/or indemnification. FHN has
evaluated its exposure under these obligations based on factors such as breach of
94
representations
and warranties, early loan delinquency and default status, foreclosure expectancy rates and
indemnification claims accordingly, and has reserved for losses of $60.9 million and $36.7 million
as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Management believes the foreclosure reserve is
sufficient to cover incurred foreclosure losses relating to loans being serviced as well as loans
sold where the servicing was not retained. The reserve for foreclosure losses is based upon a
historical progression model using a rolling 12-month average, which predicts the probability or
frequency of a mortgage loan entering foreclosure. In addition, other factors are considered,
including qualitative and quantitative factors (e.g., current economic conditions, past collection
experience, risk characteristics of the current portfolio and other factors), which are not defined
by historical loss trends or severity of losses. Table 12 provides a summary of reserves for
foreclosure losses for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The owned servicing
portfolio has decreased from $65.3 billion on September 30, 2008, to $41.8 billion on September 30,
2009 as FHN has reduced its servicing portfolio through sales through September 30, 2009, while the
foreclosure reserve has experienced increases primarily due to increases in both frequency and
severity of projected losses.
Table 12 - Reserves for Foreclosure and Repurchase Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
52,492
|
|
|
$
|
38,463
|
|
|
$
|
36,956
|
|
|
$
|
16,160
|
|
Provision for
foreclosure and
repurchase losses
|
|
|
25,692
|
|
|
|
3,397
|
|
|
|
63,676
|
|
|
|
25,153
|
|
Transfers*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(17,567
|
)
|
|
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|
|
(40,847
|
)
|
|
|
(10,713
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
60,890
|
|
|
$
|
36,726
|
|
|
$
|
60,890
|
|
|
$
|
36,726
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Primarily represents reserves established against servicing advances
for which the related MSR has been legally sold. Amounts are
transferred to the foreclosure reserve when the advances are
delivered to the buyer but recourse to FHN remains.
|
See Note 9 Contingencies and Other Disclosure or the Off balance sheet arrangements and
other contractual obligations section in this MD&A for information regarding other repurchase
obligations.
GOODWILL AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPAIRMENT
FHNs policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or
between annual assessments if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than
not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment is the
condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. In
third quarter 2009, FHN agreed to sell Capital Markets institutional equity research group, FTN
ECM. In conjunction with this agreement, FHN recognized a $14.0 million impairment of associated
goodwill. This impairment is reflected in the discontinued operations, net of tax line on the
consolidated condensed statements of income.
Accounting standards require management to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit in
assessing impairment at least annually. As such, FHN engages an independent valuation to assist in
the computation of the fair value estimates of each reporting unit as part of its annual
assessment. The 2009 assessment is currently in process. An independent assessment was completed
in 2008 and utilized three separate methodologies, applying a weighted average to each in order to
determine fair value for each reporting unit. The valuation as of October 1, 2008 indicated no
goodwill impairment in any of the reporting units. Based on further analysis and events subsequent
to the measurement date of October 1, 2008, no additional goodwill impairment has been indicated
other than that related to the pending sale of FTN ECM.
Management believes the accounting estimates associated with determining fair value as part of the
goodwill impairment test is a critical accounting estimate because estimates and assumptions are
made about FHNs future performance and cash flows, as well as other prevailing market factors
(interest rates, economic trends, etc.). FHNs policy allows management to make the determination
of fair value using appropriate valuation methodologies and inputs, including utilization of market
observable data and internal cash flow models. Independent third parties may be engaging to assist
in the valuation process. If a charge to operations for impairment results, this amount would be
reported separately as a component of noninterest expense. This critical accounting estimate
applies to the Regional Banking and Capital Markets business segments. The National Specialty
Lending, Mortgage Banking, and Corporate segments have no associated goodwill. Reporting units
have been defined as the same level as the operating business segments.
95
The impairment testing process conducted by FHN begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to each
reporting unit. FHN then completes step one of the impairment test by comparing the fair value
of each reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value
(or carrying amount) of its net assets, with goodwill included in the computation of the carrying
amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of that
reporting unit is not considered impaired, and step two of the impairment test is not necessary.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment test
is performed to determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the
carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill to the implied fair value of that goodwill. The
implied fair value of goodwill is computed by assuming all assets and liabilities of the reporting
unit would be adjusted to the current fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill.
This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value used in step two. An impairment charge is
recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
In connection with obtaining the independent valuation, management provided certain data and
information that was utilized in the estimation of fair value. This information included
budgeted and forecasted earnings of FHN at the reporting unit level. Management believes that
this information is a critical assumption underlying the estimate of fair value. Other
assumptions critical to the process were also made, including discount rates, asset and liability
growth rates, and other income and expense estimates.
While management uses the best information available to estimate future performance for each
reporting unit, future adjustments to managements projections may be necessary if conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the estimates.
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
A liability is contingent if the amount or outcome is not presently known, but may become known in
the future as a result of the occurrence of some uncertain future event. FHN estimates its
contingent liabilities based on managements estimates about the probability of outcomes and their
ability to estimate the range of exposure. Accounting standards require that a liability be
recorded if management determines that it is probable that a loss has occurred and the loss can be
reasonably estimated. In addition, it must be probable that the loss will be confirmed by some
future event. As part of the estimation process, management is required to make assumptions about
matters that are by their nature highly uncertain.
The assessment of contingent liabilities, including legal contingencies and income tax liabilities,
involves the use of critical estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Managements estimates are
based on their belief that future events will validate the current assumptions regarding the
ultimate outcome of these exposures. However, there can be no assurance that future events, such
as court decisions, decisions of arbitrators, or I.R.S. positions, will not differ from
managements assessments. Whenever practicable, management consults with third party experts
(attorneys, accountants, claims administrators, etc.) to assist with the gathering and evaluation
of information related to contingent liabilities. Based on internally and/or externally prepared
evaluations, management makes a determination whether the potential exposure requires accrual in
the financial statements.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05, Measuring
Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 09-05). ASU 09-05 updates ASC 820 to clarify that a quoted price
for the identical liability, when traded as an asset in an active market, is a Level 1 measurement
for that liability when no adjustment to the quoted price is required. ASU 09-05 further amends
ASC 820 to provide that if a quoted price for an identical liability does not exist in an active
market, the fair value of the liability should be measured using an approach that maximizes the use
of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Under the updated
provisions of ASC 820, for such liabilities fair value will be measured using either a valuation
technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, a
valuation technique that uses the quoted price for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when
traded as an asset, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of ASC
820. The update to ASC 820 is effective for the first reporting period beginning after the
issuance of ASU 09-05. The adoption of the Codification update to ASC 820 will have no effect on
FHNs statement of condition or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a Codification update to ASC 860 which provides for the removal of
the qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) concept from GAAP, resulting in the evaluation of all
former QSPEs for consolidation on and after January 1, 2010 in accordance with ASC 810. The
amendments to ASC 860 modify the criteria for achieving sale accounting for transfers of financial
assets and define the term participating interest to establish specific conditions for reporting a
transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale. The updated provisions of ASC 860 also
provide that a transferor should recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets obtained
(including a transferors beneficial interest) and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer
of financial assets accounted for as a sale. ASC 860, as amended, requires enhanced disclosures
which are generally consistent with, and supersede, the disclosures previously required by the
Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860 which was effective for periods ending after December
15, 2008. The provisions of the
96
Codification update to ASC 860 are effective prospectively for new
transfers of financial assets occurring in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and in
interim periods within those fiscal years. ASC 860s amended disclosure requirements should be
applied to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date of the Codification
update, with comparative disclosures required only for periods subsequent to initial adoption for
those disclosures not previously required under the Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860
which was effective for periods ending after December 15, 2008. FHN is currently assessing the
effects of adopting the provisions of the Codification update to ASC 860.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a Codification update to ASC 810 which revises the criteria for
determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) by replacing the
quantitative-based risks and rewards test previously required with a qualitative analysis. While
ASC 810, as amended, retains the previous guidance in ASC 810 which requires a reassessment of
whether an entity is a VIE only when certain triggering events occur, it adds an additional
criteria which triggers a reassessment of an entitys status when an event occurs such that the
holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar
rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact
the entitys economic performance. Additionally, the amendments to ASC 810 require continual
reconsideration of conclusions regarding which interest holder is the VIEs primary beneficiary.
Following the Codification update, ASC 810 will require separate presentation on the face of the
balance sheet of the assets of a consolidated VIE that can only by used to settle the VIEs
obligations and the liabilities of a consolidated VIE for which creditors or beneficial interest
holders have no recourse to the general credit of the primary beneficiary (e.g., consolidated
residential mortgage securitization trusts). ASC 810, as amended, also requires enhanced
disclosures which are generally consistent with, and supersede, the disclosures previously required
by the Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860 which was effective for periods ending after
December 15, 2008. The provisions of the Codification update to ASC 810 are effective for periods
beginning after November 15, 2009 and require reevaluation under ASC 810s amended consolidation
requirements of all QSPEs and entities currently subject to ASC 810 as of the beginning of the
first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009. If consolidation of a VIE is required
upon initial adoption, the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIE should be
measured at their carrying amounts as if ASC 810, as amended, had been applied from inception of
the VIE, with any difference between the net amounts recognized and the amount of any previously
recognized interests reflected as a cumulative effect adjustment to undivided profits. However, if
determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling
interests of the VIE may be measured at fair value. Further, if determining the carrying amounts
is not practicable, and if the activities of the VIE are primarily related to securitizations or
other forms of asset-backed financings and the assets of the VIE can be used only to settle
obligations of the entity, then the assets and liabilities of the VIE may be measured at their
unpaid principal balances. The fair value option provided under ASC 825 may also be elected for
financial assets and financial liabilities requiring consolidation as a result of initial adoption,
provided that the election is made for all eligible financial assets and financial liabilities of
the VIE. If initial application of the amendments to ASC 810 results in deconsolidation of a VIE,
any retained interest in the VIE should be measured at its carrying value as if ASC 810, as
amended, had been applied from inception of the VIE. Comparative disclosures are required only for
periods subsequent to initial adoption for those disclosures not previously required under the
Codification update to ASC 810 and ASC 860 which was effective for periods ending after December
15, 2008.
FHN is continuing to assess the effects of adopting the Codification Update to ASC 810 on all of
its proprietary residential mortgage securitization trusts based on the size and priority of
interests retained. Presented below by the total percentage of denominated financial interests
retained in a trust are the aggregate unpaid principal balances as of September 30, 2009, of loans
held by FHNs off balance sheet proprietary first lien securitization trusts and off balance sheet
HELOC and home equity loan securitization trusts, as well as the nature of FHNs retained interests
in such trusts.
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Unpaid
|
|
|
Nature of Financial Interests
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
Principal Balance
|
|
|
Retained (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1%
|
|
$
|
17,339,132
|
|
|
MSR & excess interest
|
Between 1% and 2%
|
|
|
1,275,366
|
|
|
(b)
|
Between 2% and 5%
|
|
|
336,082
|
|
|
(c)
|
Over 5%
|
|
|
35,680
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC and Home Equity Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
222,836
|
|
|
MSR & residual interest
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
In addition to the financial interests retained, which are listed in the table above, FHN also retained non-financial interests including repurchase obligations,
clean up calls, and required servicing advances for all proprietary securitization trusts.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Interests retained include MSR and excess interest, as well as principal-only strips.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Interests retained include MSR and excess interest, as well as interest-only strips, principal -only strips, and/or subordinated bonds for certain
securitizations.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Interests retained include MSR and excess interest, as well as subordinated bonds.
|
Based on its current level of involvement, upon adoption of the Codification update to ASC 810
proprietary first lien securitization trusts for which FHN retains over 5% of the denominated
financial interests will be consolidated by FHN as the retention of MSR and other retained
interests, including subordinated bonds, results in FHN being considered the trusts primary
beneficiary under the qualitative analysis required by ASC 810, as amended. Additionally, FHN
believes that upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 810 it is possible that it will consolidate
certain proprietary first lien securitization trusts where FHN and its consolidated subsidiaries
retain between 2% and 5% of the denominated financial interests, based on the size and priority of
the interests retained. Further, the previously off balance sheet HELOC and home equity loan
securitization trusts will be consolidated upon adoption of the amendments to ASC 810 as FHN will
be considered the primary beneficiary of those trusts based on its retention of MSR and residual
interests.
In December 2008, the FASB issued a Codification Update to ASC 715 which provides detailed
disclosure requirements to enhance the disclosures about an employers postretirement benefit plan
assets currently required by ASC 715-20-50. The amendments to ASC 715 are effective prospectively
for annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. FHN is currently assessing the effects of
adopting the Codification update to ASC 715.
98
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
The information called for by this item is contained in (a) Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 2 of Part I of this report at pages
64-98, (b) the section entitled Risk Management Interest Rate Risk Management of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of
FHNs 2008 Annual Report to shareholders, and (c) the Interest Rate Risk Management subsection of
Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in FHNs 2008 Annual Report to
shareholders.
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
(a)
|
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. FHNs management, with the participation
of FHNs chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness
of the design and operation of FHNs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that FHNs disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material
information relating to FHN and FHNs consolidated subsidiaries is made known to such officers
by others within these entities, particularly during the period this quarterly report was
prepared, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
|
(b)
|
|
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in
FHNs internal control over financial reporting during FHNs last fiscal quarter that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, FHNs internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
Item 4(T).
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
Not applicable
99
Part II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Items 1, 3, 4, and 5
As of the end of the third quarter 2009, the answers to Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 were either
inapplicable or negative, and therefore these items are omitted.
The following paragraph supplements the Recent Disruptions and Downturns discussion in Item 1A of
our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and also relates to the
discussion under the caption Regulatory and Legal Risks.
Potential CFPA Legislation May Adversely Affect our Consumer Businesses
In the fourth quarter of 2009 the United States Congress is considering significant new
legislation: the Consumer Finance Protection Agency (CFPA) bill (HR 3126). If enacted, the bill
provides, among other things, for a new federal regulatory agency - the CFPA - with substantial
authority over our consumer finance products and services. The CFPA would have broad powers
governing consumer matters and its rules could conflict with, and possibly override, our banks
primary regulator in such matters. As currently proposed the CFPAs rule-making authority would be
extensive, including such things as setting terms and conditions on consumer products services, and
regulating compensation of our employees who deal with consumer matters. Such rules could
substantially reduce revenues, increase costs and risks, and otherwise make our consumer businesses
less profitable or unprofitable. In addition, the bill would subject national banks, including our
bank, to regulation by all the states in a number of respects. At a minimum this partial rescission
of federal pre-emption would significantly increase compliance and operating costs, as well as the
risk of unintentional non-compliance. The bill has not been approved by Congress or signed into
law, and if enacted the final provisions could differ substantially from the bills current form.
|
|
|
Item 2
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
(a)
|
|
None
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
The Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities Table is incorporated herein by reference to
the table included in Item 2 of
Part I First Horizon National Corporation Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations at page 64.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.*
|
|
|
|
10.8(b)**
|
|
Other Compensation and Benefit Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors.
|
|
|
|
10.8(i)**
|
|
Description of salaries of the 2008 named executive officers.
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
The Risk Management-Interest Rate Risk Management subsection of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis section and the Interest Rate Risk Management
subsection of Note 26 to the Corporations consolidated financial statements,
contained, respectively, at pages 29-32 and pages 140-141 in the Corporations 2008
Annual Report to shareholders furnished to shareholders in connection with the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders on April 21, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be
filed with the Commission with this report.
|
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
*
|
|
The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of the instruments, including indentures,
defining the rights of the holders of the long-term debt of the Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
|
|
|
**
|
|
This is a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit.
|
In many agreements filed as exhibits, each party makes representations and warranties to other
parties. Those representations and warranties are made only to and for the benefit of those other
parties in the context of a business contract. Exceptions to such representations and warranties
may be partially or fully waived by such parties, or not enforced by such parties, in their
discretion. No such representation or warranty may be relied upon by any other person for any
purpose.
101
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
DATE:
November 5, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ William C. Losch III
|
|
|
Name:
|
William C. Losch III
|
|
|
Title:
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer
and
Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
102
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.*
|
|
|
|
10.8(b)**
|
|
Other Compensation and Benefit Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors.
|
|
|
|
10.8(i)**
|
|
Description of salaries of the 2008 named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
The Risk Management-Interest Rate Risk Management subsection of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis section and the Interest Rate Risk Management
subsection of Note 26 to the Corporations consolidated financial statements,
contained, respectively, at pages 29-32 and pages 140-141 in the Corporations 2008
Annual Report to shareholders furnished to shareholders in connection with the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders on April 21, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be
filed with the Commission with this report.
|
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
*
|
|
The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of the instruments, including indentures,
defining the rights of the holders of the long-term debt of the Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
|
|
|
**
|
|
This is a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit.
|
In many agreements filed as exhibits, each party makes representations and warranties to other
parties. Those representations and warranties are made only to and for the benefit of those other
parties in the context of a business contract. Exceptions to such representations and warranties
may be partially or fully waived by such parties, or not enforced by such parties, in their
discretion. No such representation or warranty may be relied upon by any other person for any
purpose.
103