UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2009
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
333-50437
Standard Parking
Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
16-1171179
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
900 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago,
Illinois
60611-1542
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(312) 274-2000
(Registrants Telephone
Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER SHARE
(Title of Each
Class)
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC
(Name of Each Exchange on
which Registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer
o
|
Accelerated
filer
þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
|
Smaller
reporting
company
o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes
o
No
þ
As of June 30, 2009, the aggregate market value of the
voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant was approximately $248.8 million, based on the
closing price of the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market.
As of March 1, 2010, there were 15,410,428 shares of
common stock of the registrant outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement to
be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 28, 2010, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Form 10-K
and the information incorporated by reference herein includes
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act. These statements relate to analyses
and other information that are based on forecasts of future
results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These
statements also relate to our future prospects, developments and
business strategies. The statements contained in this
Form 10-K,
including information we incorporate by reference, that are not
statements of historical fact may include forward-looking
statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties.
We have used the words anticipate,
believe, could, estimate,
expect, intend, may,
plan, predict, project,
will and similar terms and phrases, including
references to assumptions in this
Form 10-K,
including information we incorporate by reference, to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
made based on our managements expectations and beliefs
concerning future events affecting us and are subject to
uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and
business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and
many of which are beyond our control. These uncertainties and
factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from
those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking
statements. The following factors are among those that may cause
actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking
statements:
|
|
|
|
|
the weak economy and recent turmoil in the credit markets and
financial services industry, including their impact on our
results and our ability to give accurate guidance;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic and business conditions or
demographic trends;
|
|
|
|
the financial difficulties or bankruptcy of our major clients,
including the impact on our ability to collect receivables;
|
|
|
|
availability, terms and deployment of capital;
|
|
|
|
the loss, or renewal on less favorable terms, of management
contracts and leases;
|
|
|
|
our ability to renew our insurance policies on acceptable terms,
the extent to which our clients choose to obtain insurance
coverage through us and our ability to successfully manage
self-insured losses;
|
|
|
|
adverse litigation judgments or settlements resulting from legal
or other proceedings in which we may be involved;
|
|
|
|
seasonal trends, particularly in the first quarter of each year;
|
|
|
|
the impact of public and private regulations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to form and maintain relationships with large real
estate owners, managers and developers;
|
|
|
|
integration of future acquisitions in light of challenges in
retaining key employees, synchronizing business processes,
efficiently integrating facilities, marketing and operations,
deriving the expected acquisition synergies or budgeting the
actual costs or benefits of acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain performance bonds on acceptable terms to
guarantee our performance under certain contracts;
|
|
|
|
extraordinary events affecting parking at facilities that we
manage, including emergency safety measures, military or
terrorist attacks and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
changes in federal and state regulations including those
affecting airports, parking lots at airports or automobile use;
|
|
|
|
the loss of key employees;
|
|
|
|
development of new, competitive parking-related
services; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors discussed under Item 1A, Risk
Factors, and Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
|
All of our forward-looking statements should be considered in
light of these factors. All of our forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no
obligation to update our forward-looking statements or risk
factors to reflect new information, future events or otherwise,
except as may be required under applicable securities laws and
regulations.
3
NOTE
On December 4, 2007, our board of directors declared a
2-for-1
stock split in the form of a 100% common stock dividend to
stockholders of record as of the close of business on
January 8, 2008, which was distributed on January 17,
2008. All share and per share data included in this
Form 10-K
have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
4
PART I
Our Company
We are one of the largest and most diversified providers of
outsourced parking facility management services in the
United States and Canada. Our services include a
comprehensive set of
on-site
parking management and ground transportation services, which
consist of training, scheduling and supervising all service
personnel as well as providing customer service, marketing,
maintenance and accounting and revenue control functions
necessary to facilitate the operation of our clients
parking facilities. We also provide a range of ancillary
services such as airport shuttle operations, taxi and livery
dispatch services and municipal meter revenue collection and
enforcement services. We strive to be the #1 or #2
provider in each of the core markets in which we operate. As a
given geographic market achieves a threshold operational size,
we typically will establish a local office in order to promote
increased operating efficiency. We rely on both organic growth
and acquisitions to increase our client base and leverage our
fixed corporate and administrative costs within each major
metropolitan area. Our clients choose to outsource with us in
order to attract, service and retain customers, gain access to
the breadth and depth of our service and process expertise,
leverage our significant technology capabilities and enhance
their parking facility revenue, profitability and cash flow. As
of December 31, 2009, we managed approximately 2,100
parking facility locations containing over one million parking
spaces in approximately 335 cities, operated 145
parking-related service centers serving 63 airports, operated a
fleet of approximately 405 shuttle buses and employed a
professional staff of approximately 12,000 people.
We have provided parking services since 1929. Our history and
resulting experience have allowed us to develop and standardize
a rigorous system of processes and controls that enable us to
deliver consistent, transparent, value-added and high quality
parking facility management services. We serve a variety of
industries and have end-market specific specialization in
airports, healthcare facilities, hotels, municipalities and
government facilities, commercial real estate, residential
communities, retail and colleges and universities. We recently
began to market and offer our end-market specific services under
our new SP
Plus
®
brand. The professionals dedicated to each of our SP
Plus
®
markets and service lines possess subject matter expertise that
enables them to meet the specific demands of their clients.
Additionally, we complement our core services and help to
differentiate our clients parking facilities by offering
to their customers
Ambiance in
Parking
®
,
an approach to parking facility management that includes a
comprehensive package of amenity and customer service programs.
These programs not only make the parking experience more
enjoyable, but also convey a sense of the clients
sensitivity to and appreciation for the needs of its parking
customers. In doing so, we believe the programs serve to enhance
the value of the parking properties themselves.
We have also dedicated significant resources to human capital
management, providing comprehensive training for our employees,
delivered primarily through the use of our web-based
Standard
University
SM
learning management system, which promotes customer service and
client retention in addition to providing our employees with
continued training and career development opportunities. Our
focus on customer service and satisfaction is a key driver of
our high location retention rate, which was approximately 89%
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 87% for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
We operate our clients facilities through two types of
arrangements: management contracts and leases. As of
December 31, 2009, we operated approximately 90% of our
locations under management contracts, and for the year ended
December 31, 2009, we derived approximately 88% of our
gross profit under management contracts. As of December 31,
2009, we operated approximately 10% of our locations under
leases, and for the year ended December 31, 2009, we
derived approximately 12% of our gross profit under leases.
|
|
|
|
|
Under a management contract, we typically receive a base monthly
fee for managing the facility, and we may also receive an
incentive fee based on the achievement of facility performance
objectives. We also receive fees for ancillary services.
Typically, all of the underlying revenue and expenses under a
standard management contract flow through to our client rather
than to us.
|
|
|
|
Under a lease, we generally pay to the property owner either a
fixed annual rent, a percentage of gross customer collections,
or a combination of both. Under a lease, we collect all revenue
and are responsible for most operating expenses, but typically
we are not responsible for major maintenance, capital
expenditures or real estate taxes.
|
Our focus on recurring, predominantly fixed-fee management
contracts provides us with a measure of insulation from broader
economic cycles and enhance our visibility and relative
predictability because our management contract revenue does not
fluctuate materially in relation to variations in parking
volumes. Additionally, we are positioned to benefit from
improving macroeconomic conditions and increased parking volumes
through our exposure to lease contracts. We believe our revenue
model and contract structure mix provides a competitive
advantage when compared with competitors in our industry.
Our revenue is derived from a broad and diverse group of
clients, industry end-markets and geographies. Our clients
include some of the nations largest private and public
owners, managers and developers of major office buildings,
residential properties, commercial properties, shopping centers
and other retail properties, sports and special event complexes,
hotels, and
5
hospitals and medical centers. No single client accounted for
more than 6.4% of our revenue or more than 5.7% of our gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally,
we have built a diverse geographic footprint that as of
December 31, 2009 included operations in 41 states and
the District of Columbia, and municipalities, including New
York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, Washington D.C. and Houston,
among others, and four Canadian provinces. Our strategy is
focused on building scale and leadership positions in large,
strategic markets in order to leverage the advantages of scale
across a larger number of parking locations in a single market.
We strive to be the #1 or #2 provider in each of the
core markets in which we operate.
One of the key differentiators in our industry is the effective
use of technology, which is of increasing importance to our
clients. Our commitment to the application of technology in the
parking facility management industry has resulted in the
creation of a proprietary product,
Client
View
TM
,
which is an on-demand system that enables our clients, at their
convenience, to directly access and download their monthly
financial statements and detailed
back-up
reports. Additionally, we believe we are a leader in the field
of introducing automation and technology as part of our parking
facility operations, having been among the first to introduce
airport credit card lanes, apply bar code decal technology and
adopt various electronic payment options such as electronic fund
transfer (EFT) payments and
pay-on-foot
machine (ATM) technology. We believe that automation and
technology can enhance customer convenience, improve cash
management and increase overall profitability for our clients,
as well as allow us to add new locations and expand our
operations into new markets more effectively.
Industry
Overview
Overview
The parking industry is large and fragmented and includes
companies that provide temporary parking spaces for vehicles on
an hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly basis along with providing
various ancillary services. A substantial number of companies in
the industry offer parking services as a non-core operation in
connection with property management or ownership, and the vast
majority of companies in the industry are small, private and
operate a single parking facility. As such, the industry remains
highly fragmented with the top three operators, including
Standard Parking, having less than a 30% market share. The
industry experiences consolidation from time to time, as smaller
operators find that they lack the financial resources, economies
of scale and management techniques required to compete with
larger national providers. We expect this trend to continue and
will provide larger parking management companies with
opportunities to expand their businesses and acquire smaller
operators.
Industry
Operating Arrangements
Parking facilities operate under three general types of
arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
management contracts;
|
|
|
|
leases; and
|
|
|
|
ownership.
|
The general terms and benefits of these three types of
arrangements are as follows:
Management Contracts.
Under a management
contract, the facility operator generally receives a base
monthly fee for managing the facility and may receive an
incentive fee based on the achievement of facility performance
objectives. Facility operators also generally charge fees for
various ancillary services such as accounting, equipment leasing
and consulting. Primary responsibilities under a management
contract include hiring, training and staffing parking
personnel, and providing revenue collection, accounting,
record-keeping, insurance and facility marketing services. Under
a typical management contract, the facility operator is not
responsible for structural or mechanical repairs, or for
providing security or guard services. The facility owner usually
is responsible for operating expenses associated with the
facilitys operation, such as taxes, license and permit
fees, insurance costs, payroll and accounts receivable
processing and wages of personnel assigned to the facility,
although some management contracts, typically referred to as
reverse management contracts, require the facility
operator to pay certain of these cost categories but provide for
payment to the operator of a larger management fee. Under a
management contract, the facility owner usually is responsible
for non- routine maintenance, repair costs and capital
improvements. Management contracts are typically for a term of
one to three years (although the contracts may often be
terminated, without cause, on 30 days notice or less)
and may contain a renewal clause. As of December 31, 2009,
we operated approximately 90% of our locations under management
contracts, and for the year ended December 31, 2009, we
derived approximately 88% of our gross profit under management
contracts.
Leases.
Under a lease, the parking facility
operator generally pays to the property owner either a fixed
base rent, percentage rent that is tied to the facilitys
financial performance, or a combination of both. The parking
facility operator collects all revenue and is responsible for
most operating expenses, but typically is not responsible for
major maintenance, capital expenditures or real estate taxes. In
contrast to management contracts, leases typically are for terms
of three to ten years,
6
often contain a renewal term, and provide for a fixed payment to
the facility owner regardless of the facilitys operating
earnings. However, many of these leases may be cancelled by the
client for various reasons, including development of the real
estate for other uses. Some leases may be cancelled by the
client on as little as 30 days notice without cause.
Leased facilities generally require a longer commitment and a
larger capital investment by the parking facility operator than
do managed facilities. As of December 31, 2009, we operated
approximately 10% of our locations under leases, and for the
year ended December 31, 2009, we derived approximately 12%
of our gross profit under leases.
Ownership.
Ownership of parking facilities,
either independently or through joint ventures, entails greater
potential risks and rewards than either managed or leased
facilities. All owned facility revenue flows directly to the
owner, and the owner has the potential to realize benefits of
appreciation in the value of the underlying real estate.
Ownership of parking facilities usually requires large capital
investments, and the owner is responsible for all obligations
related to the property, including all structural, mechanical
and electrical maintenance and repairs and property taxes. We do
not own any parking facilities.
Industry
Growth Dynamics
A number of industry trends should facilitate growth for larger
outsourced commercial parking facility management providers,
including the following:
Opportunities From Large Property Managers, Owners and
Developers.
As a result of past industry
consolidation, there is a significant number of national
property managers, owners and developers that own or manage
multiple locations. Sophisticated property owners consider
parking a profit center that experienced parking facility
management companies can maximize. This dynamic favors larger
parking facility operators that can provide specialized,
value-added professional services with nationwide coverage.
Outsourcing of Parking Management and Related
Services.
Growth in the parking management
industry has resulted from a trend by parking facility owners to
outsource the management of their parking and related operations
to independent operators. We believe that entities such as large
property managers, owners and developers, as well as cities,
municipal authorities, hospitals and universities, in an effort
to focus on their core competencies, reduce operating budgets
and increase efficiency and profitability, will continue and
perhaps increase the practice of retaining parking management
companies to operate facilities and provide related services,
including shuttle bus operations, municipal meter collection and
valet parking.
Vendor Consolidation.
Based on interactions
with our clients, we believe that many parking facility owners
and managers are evaluating the benefits of reducing the number
of parking facility management relationships they maintain. We
believe this is a function of the need to reduce costs
associated with interacting with a large number of third-party
suppliers coupled with the need to foster closer inter-company
relationships. By limiting the number of outsourcing vendors,
companies will benefit from suppliers who will invest the time
and effort to understand every facet of the clients
business and industry and who can effectively manage and handle
all aspects of their daily requirements. We believe a trend
towards vendor consolidation can benefit a company like ours,
given our national footprint and scale, extensive experience,
broad process capabilities and a demonstrated ability to create
value for our clients.
Industry Consolidation.
The parking management
industry is highly fragmented, with hundreds of small regional
or local operators. We believe national parking facility
operators have a competitive advantage over local and regional
operators by reason of their:
|
|
|
|
|
broad product and service offerings;
|
|
|
|
deeper and more experienced management;
|
|
|
|
relationships with large, national property managers, developers
and owners;
|
|
|
|
efficient cost structure due to economies of scale; and
|
|
|
|
financial resources to invest in infrastructure and information
systems.
|
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe we have the following key competitive strengths:
Leading Market Position with a Unique Value
Proposition.
We are one of the largest and most
diversified providers of outsourced parking facility management
services in the United States and Canada. We strive to be
the #1 or #2 provider in each of the core markets in
which we operate. We recently began to market and offer many of
our services under our new SP
Plus
®
brand, which reflects our ability to provide customized
solutions and meet the varied demands of our diverse end-markets
and supplement them with
Ambiance in
Parking
®
,
a comprehensive package of amenity and customer service
programs. We believe our ability to offer a comprehensive range
of services on a national basis is a significant competitive
advantage and allows our
7
clients to attract, service and retain customers, gain access to
the breadth and depth of our service and process expertise,
leverage our significant technology capabilities and enhance
their parking facility revenue, profitability and cash flow.
Our Scale and Diversification.
As of
December 31, 2009, we managed approximately 2,100 parking
facility locations containing over one million parking spaces in
approximately 335 cities, operated 145 parking-related
service centers serving 63 airports, operated a fleet of
approximately 405 shuttle buses and employed a professional
staff of approximately 12,000 people. We benefit from
diversification across our client base, industry end-markets and
geographic locations.
|
|
|
|
|
Client Base.
Our clients include some of the
nations largest private and public owners, managers and
developers of major office buildings, residential properties,
commercial properties, shopping centers and other retail
properties, sports and special event complexes, hotels, and
hospitals and medical centers. No single client accounted for
more than 6.4% of our revenue or more than 5.7% of our gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Industry End-Markets.
We believe that our
industry end-market diversification allows us to minimize our
exposure to industry-specific seasonality and volatility. We
believe that the breadth of end-markets we serve and the depth
of services we offer to those end-markets provide us with a
broader base of customers that we can target.
|
|
|
|
Geographic Locations.
We have a diverse
geographic footprint that included operations in 41 states
and the District of Columbia and four Canadian provinces as of
December 31, 2009. We strive to be the #1 or #2
provider in each of the core markets in which we operate, and
our strategy is focused on building size and leadership
positions in large, strategic markets in order to leverage the
advantages of scale across a larger number of parking locations
in a single market.
|
Additionally, our scale has enabled us to significantly enhance
our operating efficiency over the past several years by
standardizing processes and managing overhead costs.
Stable Client Relationships.
We have a track
record of providing our clients and parking customers with a
consistent, value-added and high quality parking facility
management experience, as reflected by our high location
retention rate, which was approximately 89% for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 87% for the year ended
December 31, 2009. These statistics include the impact of
our decision to exit from unprofitable contracts. As our clients
continue to outsource the management of their parking operations
and look to consolidate the number of their outsourcing
providers, we believe this trend can benefit companies like
ours, which has a national footprint and scale, extensive
experience, broad process capabilities, and a demonstrated
ability to create value for our clients.
Established Platform for Future Growth.
We
have invested resources and developed a national infrastructure
and technology platform which is complemented by significant
management expertise that allows us to scale our business for
future growth effectively and efficiently. We have the ability
to transition into a new location very quickly, from the
simplest to the most complex operation, and have experience
working with incumbent facility managers to effect smooth and
efficient takeovers and integrate new locations seamlessly into
our operations.
Visible and Predictable Business Model.
We
believe that our business model provides us with a measure of
insulation from broader economic cycles because approximately
88% of our gross profit for the year ended December 31,
2009 was generated from fixed-fee and reverse management fee
management contracts that for the most part are not dependent
upon the level of utilization of those parking facilities.
Additionally, because we do not own any parking facilities, we
have few of the risks of real estate ownership. We benefit
further from visibility provided by a recurring revenue model
reinforced by contract retention rates that have approximated
90% over the past five years.
Highly Capital Efficient Business with Attractive Cash Flow
Characteristics.
Our business generates
attractive cash flow due to negative working capital dynamics
and our low capital expenditure requirements. For the fiscal
year December 31, 2008, we generated approximately
$29.3 million of cash flow from operating activities, and
our capital expenditures for the purpose of leasehold
improvements and equipment were $6.3 million. For the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we generated
approximately $21.8 million of cash flow from operating
activities, and during the same period our capital expenditures
for the purpose of leasehold improvements and equipment were
$3.5 million.
Focus on Operational Excellence and Human Capital
Management.
The companys culture and
training programs place a continuing focus on excellence in the
execution of all aspects of
day-to-day
parking facility operation. This focus is reflected in our
ability to deliver to our clients a professional, high-quality
product through well-trained, service-oriented personnel, which
we believe differentiates us from our competitors. To support
our focus on operational excellence, we manage our human capital
through a comprehensive, structured program that evaluates the
competencies and performance of all of our key operations and
administrative support personnel on an annual basis. Based on
those evaluations, we create detailed developmental plans
designed to provide our personnel with the skills and tools
needed to perform their current duties effectively and to
prepare themselves for future growth and advancement. We have
also dedicated significant resources to human capital
management, providing comprehensive training for our employees,
delivered primarily through the use of our web-based
Standard
8
University
SM
learning management system, which promotes customer service and
client retention in addition to providing our employees with
continued training and career development opportunities.
Experienced Management Team.
Our current
senior management team has a proven track record of growing our
existing business organically and consistently integrating
acquisitions. The team combines over 190 years of industry
experience, including an average of approximately 20 years
with us or with our acquired companies.
Our
Growth Strategy
Building on these competitive strengths, we believe we are
well-positioned to execute on the following growth strategies:
Grow Our Portfolio of Contracts in Existing Geographic
Markets.
Our strategy is to capitalize on
economies of scale and operating efficiencies by expanding our
contract portfolio in our existing geographic markets,
especially in our core markets. We market our services in each
of our existing geographic markets with the goal of becoming
the #1 or #2 provider in that market. As a given
geographic market achieves a threshold operational size, we
typically will establish a local office in order to promote
increased operating efficiency by enabling local managers to use
a common staff for recruiting, training and human resources
support. This concentration of operating locations allows for
increased operating efficiency and superior levels of customer
service and retention through the accessibility of local
managers and support resources. We rely on both organic growth
and acquisitions to increase our client base and leverage our
fixed corporate and administrative costs within each major
metropolitan area.
Increase Penetration in Our Current Vertical
End-Markets.
We believe that a significant
opportunity exists for us to expand our presence into certain
industry end-markets, such as colleges and universities,
hospitals and medical centers as well as municipalities. In
order to effectively target these new markets, we have
implemented a
go-to-market
strategy of aligning our business by vertical end-markets and
branding our domain expertise through our SP
Plus
®
market designations to highlight the specialized expertise and
services that we provide to meet the needs of each particular
industry and customer. This combination, in turn, allows us to
deliver high quality and consistent services for our clients,
enhances customer loyalty and allows us to further leverage our
service capabilities, technology platform and regional and
market-based management structure.
Expand and Cross-Sell Additional Services to Drive
Incremental Revenue.
We believe we have
significant opportunities to strengthen our relationships with
existing clients and to attract new clients by continuing to
cross-sell value-added services that complement our core parking
operations. These services include shuttle bus operations, taxi
and livery dispatch services, concierge-type ground
transportation, on-street parking meter collection and facility
maintenance services. We also are evaluating new service
opportunities, such as security services, that would leverage
our core competency of managing large networks of geographically
dispersed employees. To better reflect these broader
competencies, we developed our new SP
Plus
®
brand, which emphasizes our specialized market expertise and
distinguish our service lines from the traditional parking
services we provide. Our SP
Plus
®
brand includes market designations such as SP
Plus
®
Airport Services, SP
Plus
®
Healthcare Services, SP
Plus
®
Hotel Services, SP Plus
®
Municipal Services, SP
Plus
®
Office Services, SP
Plus
®
Residential Services, SP
Plus
®
Retail Services and SP
Plus
®
University Services, which reflect the market-specific subject
matter expertise that enables our professionals to meet the
varied demands of those environments. Because our capabilities
range beyond parking facility management, our SP
Plus
®
Transportation and SP
Plus
®
Maintenance brands more clearly distinguish those service lines
from the traditional parking services that we provide under our
Standard Parking brand. By offering this wide assortment of
ancillary services, we are able to broaden the scope of our
client relationships and thus increase our clients
reliance and dependency on our services, which in turn results
in enhanced client retention rates and higher revenue and gross
profit per location.
Expand Our Geographic Platform.
We believe
that opportunities exist to develop new geographic markets
either through new contract wins, acquisitions, alliances or
partnerships. Clients who outsource the management of their
parking operations often have a presence in a variety of urban
markets and seek to outsource the management of their parking
facilities to a national provider. We intend to leverage
relationships with existing clients that have locations in
multiple markets as one potential entry point into developing
new core markets. Additionally, we may continue to pursue
acquisitions as a means of gaining critical mass in a new market.
Achieve Incremental Revenue Through Parking
Data.
We expect to achieve incremental revenue
through our participation as one of the founding partners of
Parking Data Ventures (PDV), a limited liability company that
sells licenses to use a database, compiled from more than 20 of
the largest parking companies operating more than 10,000 parking
facilities in North America, that provides parking information
to consumers via the Internet and mobile data devices. PDV
offers what is believed to be the largest, highest-quality
database of proprietary parking facility information available
throughout North America, including a parking facilitys
entry points, hours of operation, accepted forms of payment,
normalized pricing schedule, height restrictions and amenities
provided. Real-time payment and reservation functionality may be
enabled in the future. PDV is actively licensing its parking
database directly to Internet portals, navigation device
providers and wireless carriers that are seeking to enhance
their local search and location-based service applications.
9
Continued Focus on Management Contracts and Operational
Efficiencies to Further Improve Profitability.
We
continue to focus on the growth of lower-risk management
contracts, which are inherently more predictable. We have
invested substantial resources in information technology and
have identified a number of internal initiatives to consolidate
various corporate functions and improve our processes and
service offerings. In addition, we will continue to evaluate and
improve our human capital management to ensure a consistent and
high-level of service for our clients. These efficiency measures
have improved our cost structure and enhanced our financial
strength, which we believe will continue to yield future
benefits.
Pursue Opportunistic, Accretive
Acquisitions.
The outsourced parking management
industry remains highly fragmented and presents a significant
opportunity for us. Given the scale in our operating platform,
we have a demonstrated ability to successfully identify, acquire
and integrate accretive tuck-in acquisitions. For example, in
July 2009, we acquired the assets of Gameday Management Group,
U.S., an Orlando-based company that plans the operation of
transportation and parking systems for major stadium and
sporting events. Gameday has provided its transportation and
traffic management services for high-profile events, including
Super Bowls XXX-XLIV, the Daytona 500 and the 2009 Presidential
Inauguration, and will be providing its services at the upcoming
Vancouver Winter Olympic Games. This acquisition, which will be
transitioned into our SP
Plus
®
brand, will enable us to provide our stadium and special event
clients with transportation and parking planning expertise that
can meet their most complex needs. We also expect to leverage
Gamedays expertise into new parking and transportation
opportunities in the future. Among the assets acquired is
Gamedays Click and
Park
SM
online parking and traffic management system, which enables
parking customers to reserve and pay for parking online in
advance of an event. The addition of this capability to our
product line is an example of how we are integrating technology
into a changing parking industry. We will continue to
selectively pursue acquisition opportunities that help us
acquire scale or enhance our service capabilities.
We also provide a range of ancillary services to satisfy client
needs such as municipal meter collection and valet parking.
Services
As a professional parking management company, we provide a
comprehensive, turn-key package of parking services to our
clients. Under a typical management contract structure, we are
responsible for providing and supervising all personnel
necessary to facilitate daily parking operations including
cashiers, porters, valet attendants, managers, bookkeepers, and
a variety of maintenance, marketing, customer service, and
accounting and revenue control functions. By way of example, our
typical
day-to-day
operating duties, whether performed using our own personnel or
subcontracted vendors, include:
|
|
|
|
|
Collection and deposit of daily and monthly parking revenues
from all parking customers.
|
|
|
|
Daily housekeeping to maintain the facility in a clean and
orderly manner.
|
|
|
|
Restriping of the parking stalls as necessary.
|
|
|
|
Routine maintenance of parking equipment (
e.g.
, ticket
dispensing machines, parking gate arms, fee computers).
|
|
|
|
Marketing efforts designed to maximize gross parking revenues.
|
|
|
|
Delivery of courteous and professional customer relations.
|
|
|
|
Painting of walkways, curbs, ceilings, walls or other facility
surfaces.
|
|
|
|
Snow removal from sidewalks and driveways.
|
The scope of our management services typically also includes a
number of functions that support the basic daily facility
operations, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation of an annual operating budget reflecting our
estimates of the annual gross parking revenues that the facility
will generate from its parking customers, as well as the costs
and expenses to be incurred in connection with the
facilitys operation.
|
|
|
|
Evaluation and analysis of, and consultation with our clients
with respect to, price structures that will optimize our
clients revenue objectives.
|
|
|
|
Consultation with our clients regarding which of our customer
amenities are appropriate
and/or
desirable for implementation at the clients parking
facility.
|
|
|
|
Implementation of a wide range of operational and revenue
control processes and procedures, including internal audit
procedures, designed to maximize and protect the facilitys
parking revenues. Compliance with our mandated processes and
procedures is supervised by dedicated internal audit and
contract compliance groups.
|
|
|
|
Consultation with our clients regarding any recommended
modifications in facility design or traffic flow, or the
installation of new or updated parking equipment, designed both
to enhance the ease and convenience of the parking experience
for the parking customers and to maximize facility profitability.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly reporting to our clients regarding the facilitys
operating results. For those clients who wish to directly access
their financial reporting information on-line, we offer the use
of our proprietary
Client
View
SM
client reporting system, which provides on-line access to
site-level financial and operating information.
|
Ancillary
Services
Beyond the conventional parking facility management services
described above, we also offer an expanded range of ancillary
services. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
At various airports throughout the United States, we provide
shuttle bus vehicles and the drivers to operate them in support
of on-airport car rental operations as well as private
off-airport parking locations.
|
|
|
|
At certain airports, we provide ancillary ground transportation
services, such as taxi and livery dispatch services, as well as
concierge-type ground transportation information and support
services for arriving passengers.
|
|
|
|
For municipalities, we provide basic shuttle bus services,
on-street parking meter collection and other forms of parking
enforcement services.
|
|
|
|
Within the medical center and hospital market, we provide valet
parking and shuttle bus services.
|
Amenities
and Customer Service Programs
We offer a comprehensive package of amenity and customer service
programs, branded as
Ambiance in
Parking
®
,
that can be provided to our customers, many at nominal or no
cost to the client. These programs not only make the parking
experience more enjoyable, but also convey a sense of the
clients sensitivity to and appreciation of the needs of
its parking customers. In doing so, we believe the programs
serve to enhance the value of the parking properties themselves.
Musical Theme Floor Reminder System.
Our
musical theme floor reminder system is designed to help
customers remember the garage level on which they parked. A
different song is played on each floor of the parking garage.
Each floor also displays distinctive signage and graphics that
correspond with the floors theme. For example, in one
parking facility with U.S. colleges as a theme, a different
college logo is displayed, and that colleges specific
fight song is heard, on each parking level. Other parking
facilities have themes such as famous recording artists, musical
instruments, and professional sports teams.
Books-To-Go
®
CD Library.
Monthly customers can
borrow free of charge audio CD to which
they can listen as they drive to and from work. A wide selection
of fiction, non-fiction and business titles is maintained in the
facility office.
Films-To-Go
®
DVD Library.
This amenity builds on the
success of our popular
Books-To-Go
®
program. DVDs of many popular movie titles are stocked in the
parking facility office and made available free of charge to
monthly customers. The movie selections are updated on a regular
basis.
Little
Parkers
®
Child-Friendly Facilities.
This amenity
creates a family atmosphere at the parking facility. Customers
may use baby changing stations installed in the public
restrooms. Kids appreciate the distribution of free toys such as
bubble bottles, coloring books and stuffed animals.
Complimentary Driver Assistance
Services.
Parking facility attendants provide a
wide range of complimentary services to customers with car
problems. Assistance can include charging weak batteries,
inflating/changing tires, cleaning windshields and refilling
windshield washer fluid. Attendants also can help customers
locate their vehicles and escort them to their cars.
Standard Equipment & Technology Upgrade
Program
®
Services
(SETUP
®
).
Standard
Parking provides clients with a complete turnkey solution to
managing all phases of new equipment projects, from initial
design to installation to ongoing maintenance. Our design team
will suggest a complete solution intended to return to our
clients the greatest value for their investment based upon
consideration of a wide array of choices as to both equipment
(such as
Pay-On-Foot,
Automated Vehicle Identification and Automated Credit/Debit Card
machine technology) and services (procurement, project
management, installation and maintenance).
Standard Road
Assist
®
Emergency Services.
Parking customers
experiencing vehicle problems beyond weak batteries and low tire
pressure call our toll-free number to receive, on a
pay-per-use
basis, a basic package of emergency services, including towing
up to five miles, jump starting, flat tire changing, fuel
delivery, extracting a vehicle from the side of the road and
lock-out service. The emergency services are provided at the
parking facility or anywhere on the road.
CarCare Maintenance Services.
A car service
vendor will
pick-up
a
customers car from the parking facility, contact the
customer with an estimate, service the car during normal working
hours and return it to the facility before the end of the
business day.
11
ParkNet
®
Traffic Information System.
The system
provides customers with continuously updated traffic reports on
a site-specific basis so that drivers can learn not only about
traffic conditions on the area highways, but also about
conditions in the immediate vicinity of the parking facility.
Automated Teller
Machines.
On-site
ATM machines provide customers access to cash from bankcards and
credit cards. We arrange for the installation of the machine,
operated and maintained by an outside vendor. The parking
facility realizes supplemental income from a fixed monthly rent
and a share of usage transaction fees.
Complimentary Courtesy Umbrellas and
Flashlights.
Courtesy umbrellas are loaned to
customers on rainy days. A similar lending program can be
implemented to provide flashlights in emergency situations or
power outages.
Complimentary Services/Customer Appreciation
Days.
Our clients select from a variety of
complimentary services that we provide as a special way of
saying thank you to our parking customers. Depending
on client preferences, coffee, donuts
and/or
newspapers occasionally are provided to customers during the
morning rush hour. On certain holidays, candy, with wrappers
that can be customized with the facility logo, can be
distributed to customers as they exit. We also can distribute
personalized promotional items, such as ice scrapers and
key-chains.
Business
Development
Our efforts to attract new clients are primarily concentrated in
and coordinated by a dedicated business development group, whose
background and expertise is in the field of sales and marketing,
and whose financial compensation is determined to a significant
extent by their business development success. This business
development group is responsible for forecasting sales,
maintaining a pipeline of prospective and existing clients,
initiating contacts with such clients, and then following
through to coordinate meetings involving those clients and the
appropriate members of our operations hierarchy. By
concentrating our sales efforts through this dedicated group, we
enable our operations personnel to focus on achieving excellence
in our parking facility operations and maximizing our
clients parking profits and our own profitability.
We also place a specific focus on marketing and client
relationship efforts that pertain to those clients having a
large regional or national presence. Accordingly, we assign a
dedicated executive to those clients to address any existing
portfolio issues, as well as to reinforce existing
and develop new account relationships and to take
any other action that may further our business development
interests.
Operations
We maintain regional and city offices throughout the United
States and Canada in order to support approximately
12,000 employees and approximately 2,100 locations. These
offices serve as the central bases through which we provide the
employees to staff our parking facilities as well as the
on-site
and
support management staff to oversee those operations. Our
administrative staff accountants are based in those same offices
and facilitate the efficient, accurate and timely production and
delivery to our clients of our monthly reports. Having these
all-inclusive operations and accounting teams located in
regional and city offices throughout the United States and
Canada allows us to add new locations quickly and in a
cost-efficient manner. To facilitate the training of our
facility personnel throughout the country, we have created
Standard
University
sm
,
the foundation of all our formal training programs that span a
wide range of topics including soft skills, technology,
software, leadership skills and operating procedures. Courses
are deployed using a multitude of methods including classroom
sessions, web-based sessions, and self-managed, computer-based
training.
Standard
Universit
y
sm
is available to our employees on a 24/7 basis so they may access
training and information when they need it.
Our overall basic corporate functions in the areas of finance,
human resources, risk management, legal, purchasing and
procurement, general administration, strategy and information
and technology are based in our Chicago corporate office. The
Chicago corporate office also supports and promotes consistency
throughout our field operations by developing and administering
our operational, financial and administrative policies,
practices and procedures.
12
Clients
and Properties
Our client base includes a diverse cross-section of public and
private owners, developers and managers of real estate. A list
of some of our clients, and the types of properties for which we
operate their parking, include:
|
|
|
Client / Property
|
|
Property Type
|
|
American Museum of Natural History
|
|
Museum
|
Brookfield Properties, Ltd.
|
|
Office
|
Chicago OHare International and Chicago Midway Airports
|
|
Airport
|
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company
|
|
Office
|
Four Seasons Hotel
|
|
Hotel
|
Hartford Bradley International Airport
|
|
Airport
|
Harvard Medical School
|
|
University/Medical
|
JMB Realty Corporation
|
|
Office
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
|
|
Retail
|
Nationwide Realty Investors Ltd.
|
|
Office and Special event
|
Westfield Properties Shoppingtowns
|
|
Retail
|
No single client represented more than 6.4% of revenues or more
than 5.7% of our gross profit for the year ended
December 31, 2009. For the years ended December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008, we retained an average of 87%
and 89%, respectively, of our locations (which statistic
includes the impact of our decision to exit from unprofitable
contracts).
Information
Technology
We believe that automation and technology can enhance customer
convenience, lower labor costs, improve cash management and
increase overall profitability. We have been a leader in the
field of introducing automation and technology to the parking
business and we were among the first to adopt electronic fund
transfer (EFT) payment options,
pay-on-foot
(ATM) technology and bar code decal technology.
To promote internal efficiency, we have created advanced
information systems that connect local offices across the
country to our corporate headquarters. These systems support
accounting, financial management and reporting practices,
general operating procedures, training, employment policies,
cash controls and marketing procedures. Our commitment to the
application of technology in the parking management business has
resulted in the creation of a proprietary product,
Client
View
tm
,
an Internet-based system that gives our clients the flexibility
and convenience to access and download their monthly financials
and detailed
back-up
reports. We believe that our standardized processes and controls
enhance our ability to successfully add new locations and expand
our operations into new markets.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we employed approximately 11,970
individuals, including approximately 7,110 full-time and
4,860 part-time employees. As of December 31, 2008, we
employed approximately 13,320 individuals, including
approximately 7,690 full-time and 5,630 part-time
employees. Approximately 28% of our employees are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. No single collective
bargaining agreement covers a material number of employees. We
believe that our employee relations are good.
Insurance
We purchase comprehensive liability insurance covering certain
claims that occur at parking facilities we lease or manage. The
primary amount of such coverage is $2.0 million per
occurrence and $2.0 million in the aggregate per facility
for our garage liability and garage keepers legal liability
coverages. In addition, we purchase workers compensation
insurance for all eligible employees and umbrella/excess
liability coverage. Under our various liability and
workers compensation insurance policies, we are obligated
to reimburse the insurance carrier for the first $250,000 of any
loss. As a result, we are, in effect, self-insured for all
claims up to that deductible level. We utilize a third-party
administrator to process and pay claims. We also purchase
property insurance that provides coverage for loss or damage to
our property and in some cases our clients property, as
well as business interruption coverage for lost operating income
and certain associated expenses. The deductible applicable to
any given loss under our property insurance policy varies based
upon the insured values and the peril that causes the loss. We
also purchase group health insurance with respect to eligible
full-time employees and family members (whether such employees
work at leased or managed facilities) and are fully-insured for
all covered expenses. We believe that our insurance coverage is
adequate and consistent with industry practice.
13
Because of the size of the operations covered and our claims
experience, we purchase insurance policies at prices that we
believe represent a discount to the prices that would typically
be charged to parking facility owners on a stand-alone basis.
The clients for whom we operate parking facilities pursuant to
management contracts have the option of purchasing their own
liability insurance policies (provided that we are named as an
additional insured pursuant to an additional insured
endorsement), but historically most of our clients have chosen
to obtain insurance coverage by being named as additional
insureds under our master liability insurance policies. Pursuant
to our management contracts we charge to such clients an
allocated portion of our insurance-related costs at rates that
we believe are competitive. A material reduction or increase in
the number of clients who obtain their insurance coverage by
being named as additional insureds under our liability policies
could have a material effect on our operating income. In
addition, a material change in insurance costs due to a change
in the number or severity of claims, or an increase in claims
costs or premiums paid by us, could have a material effect on
our operating income.
Competition
The parking industry is fragmented and highly competitive, with
limited barriers to entry. We face direct competition for
additional facilities to manage or lease, while our facilities
themselves compete with nearby facilities for our parking
customers and in the labor market generally for qualified
employees. Moreover, the construction of new parking facilities
near our existing facilities can adversely affect our business.
There are only a few national parking management companies that
compete with us. We also face competition from numerous smaller,
locally owned independent parking operators, as well as from
developers, hotels, national financial services companies and
other institutions that manage their own parking facilities as
well as facilities owned by others. Many municipalities and
other governmental entities also operate their own parking
facilities, potentially eliminating those facilities as
management or lease opportunities for us. Some of our present
and potential competitors have or may obtain greater financial
and marketing resources than us, which may negatively impact our
ability to retain existing contracts and gain new contracts. We
face significant competition in our efforts to provide ancillary
services such as shuttle bus services and on-street parking
enforcement because several large companies specialize in these
services.
Seasonality
During the first quarter of each year, seasonality impacts our
performance with regard to moderating revenues, with the reduced
levels of travel most clearly reflected in the parking activity
associated with our airport and hotel businesses as well as
increases in certain costs of parking services, such as snow
removal, both of which negatively affect gross profit. Although
our revenues and profitability are affected by the seasonality
of the business, general and administrative costs are relatively
stable throughout the fiscal year. See Item 6,
Selected Financial Data, for further information.
Regulation
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws,
ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or
operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal
or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in
such property. Such laws typically impose liability without
regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was
responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic
substances. In connection with the operation of parking
facilities, we may be potentially liable for any such costs. In
addition, from time to time we are involved in environmental
issues at certain of our locations or in connection with our
operations. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate
outcome of any of these matters, based on information currently
available, management believes that none of these matters,
individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably likely to have
a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows. The cost of defending against claims
of liability, or of remediating a contaminated property, could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Our business is not otherwise substantially affected by direct
governmental regulation, although both municipal and state
authorities sometimes directly regulate parking facilities. We
are affected by laws and regulations (such as zoning ordinances)
that are common to any business that deals with real estate and
by regulations (such as labor and tax laws) that affect
companies with a large number of employees. In addition, several
state and local laws have been passed in recent years that
encourage car pooling and the use of mass transit. Laws and
regulations that reduce the number of cars and vehicles being
driven could adversely impact our business.
We collect and remit sales/parking taxes and file tax returns
for and on behalf of ourselves and our clients. We are affected
by laws and regulations that may impose a direct assessment on
us for failure to remit sales/parking taxes or to file tax
returns for ourselves and on behalf of our clients.
Various other governmental regulations affect our operation of
parking facilities, both directly and indirectly, including the
ADA. Under the ADA, all public accommodations, including parking
facilities, are required to meet certain federal requirements
related to access and use by disabled persons. For example, the
ADA requires parking facilities to include handicapped spaces,
headroom for wheelchair vans, attendants booths that
accommodate wheelchairs and elevators that are operable by
disabled
14
persons. When negotiating management contracts and leases with
clients, we generally require that the property owner
contractually assume responsibility for any ADA liability in
connection with the property. There can be no assurance,
however, that the property owner has assumed such liability for
any given property and there can be no assurance that we would
not be held liable despite assumption of responsibility for such
liability by the property owner. Management believes that the
parking facilities we operate are in substantial compliance with
ADA requirements.
Regulations by the Federal Aviation Administration may affect
our business. The FAA generally prohibits parking within
300 feet of airport terminals during times of heightened
alert. The 300 foot rule and new regulations may prevent us from
using a number of existing spaces during heightened security
alerts at airports. Reductions in the number of parking spaces
may reduce our gross profit and cash flow for both our leased
facilities and those facilities we operate under management
contracts.
Corporate
Information
Our headquarters are located at 900 N. Michigan
Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago, Illinois
60611-1542.
Our telephone number is
(312) 274-2000.
Our Standard Parking brands web site address is
www.standardparking.com
and our SP
Plus
®
brands website address is www.spplus.com. Our periodic
reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC
are available free of charge through our web site promptly after
those reports and other information are electronically filed
with or furnished to the SEC. Information contained on our web
site or any other web site is not incorporated by reference into
this or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC, and
you should not consider information contained on our web site or
any other web site to be a part of this or any other report we
file with or furnish to the SEC.
Intellectual
Property
Standard
Parking
®
and the Standard Parking logo and SP
Plus
®
and the SP Plus logo, are service marks registered with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, we have
registered the names and, as applicable, the logos of all of our
material subsidiaries and divisions as service marks with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office or the equivalent
state registry, including the right to the exclusive use of the
name Central Park in the Chicago metropolitan area. We invented
the Multi-Level Vehicle Parking Facility musical Theme
Floor Reminder System, and obtained trademark registrations for
our proprietary parker programs, such as
Books-to-Go
®
,
Films-To-Go
®
,
Little
Parkers
®
and
Ambiance in
Parking
®
and our comprehensive training program,
Standard
University
sm
.
We have also registered the copyright rights in our proprietary
software, such as
Click and
Park
tm
,
Click and
Ride
tm
,
Client
View
tm
,
Hand Held
Program
tm
,
License Plate Inventory
Programs
tm
and
ParkStat
tm
with the United States Copyright Office.
You should carefully consider the specific risk factors
described below together with all other information contained in
or incorporated by reference into this report, as these risks,
among others, are important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ from our historical results. It is not
possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently,
you should not consider any such list to be a complete statement
of all potential risks or uncertainties applicable to our
business.
The
weak economy and turmoil in the credit markets and the financial
services industry may reduce demand for our services, lower our
earnings and harm our operations.
Recently, the credit markets and the financial services industry
have been experiencing a period of unprecedented turmoil and
upheaval characterized by the bankruptcy, failure, collapse or
sale of various financial institutions and an unprecedented
level of intervention from the United States government. While
the ultimate outcome of these events cannot be predicted, they
may have a material adverse effect on us and our costs of
borrowing. These events could also adversely impact the
availability of financing to our clients and therefore our
ability to collect amounts due from them, or cause such clients
to terminate their contracts with us completely.
Adverse
economic and demographic trends could materially adversely
affect our business.
The U.S. Department of Labor has reported that since
December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has increased by
7.3 million to 14.8 million, and the unemployment rate
has doubled to 9.7% as of February 2010. High domestic
unemployment, coupled with the recent recession and weak
economy, have contributed to reduced discretionary spending by
consumers and slowed or reduced economic activity by businesses
in the United States and most major global economies compared to
2007 levels.
Our business operations are located in North America and tend to
be concentrated in large urban areas. Many of our customers are
workers who commute by car to their places of employment in
these urban centers. Our business could be materially adversely
affected to the extent that weak economic conditions or
demographic factors have resulted in the elimination of jobs and
rising unemployment in these large urban areas. In addition,
increased unemployment levels, the
15
movement of white-collar jobs from urban centers to suburbs or
out of North America entirely, increased office vacancies in
urban areas, movement toward home office alternatives, or lower
consumer spending could reduce consumer demand for our services.
Weak economic conditions could also lead to a decline in parking
at airports and commercial facilities, including facilities
owned by retail operators and hotels. In particular, reductions
in parking at leased facilities can lower our profit because a
decrease in revenue would be exacerbated by fixed costs that we
must pay under our leases. As of December 31, 2009, we
operated 10% of our locations under leases, and for the year
ended December 31, 2009, we derived 12% of our gross profit
under leases.
If adverse economic conditions reduce discretionary spending,
business travel or other economic activity that fuels demand for
our services, our earnings could be reduced. Adverse changes in
local and national economic conditions could also depress prices
for our services or cause our clients to cancel their agreements
to purchase our services.
The
financial difficulties or bankruptcy of one or more of our major
clients could adversely affect our results.
Future revenue and our ability to collect accounts receivable
depend, in part, on the financial strength of our clients. We
estimate an allowance for accounts we do not consider
collectible, and this allowance adversely impacts profitability.
In the event that our clients experience financial difficulty,
become unable to obtain financing or seek bankruptcy protection,
including as a result of the recent turmoil in the credit
markets, our profitability would be further impacted by our
failure to collect accounts receivable in excess of the
estimated allowance. Additionally, our future revenue would be
reduced by the loss of these clients or by the cancellation of
leases or management contracts by clients in bankruptcy.
The
weak economy could negatively impact results and our ability to
give accurate guidance.
From
time-to-time
we may publicly provide earnings or other forms of guidance,
which reflect our predictions about future revenue, operating
costs and capital structure, among other factors. These
predictions may be significantly impacted by estimates, as well
as other factors that are beyond our control, and may not turn
out to be correct due to the unknown consequences of a weak
economy and a prolonged recovery. Actual results for all
estimates could differ materially from the estimates and
assumptions that we use, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
Our
working capital and liquidity may be adversely affected if a
significant number of our clients require us to deposit all
parking revenue into their respective accounts.
We frequently contract with clients to hold parking revenue in
our account and remit the revenue, minus the operating expenses
and our fee, to our clients at the end of the month. Some
clients, however, require us to deposit parking revenue in their
accounts on a daily basis. This type of arrangement requires us
to pay costs as they are incurred and receive reimbursement and
our management fee after the end of the month. There can be no
assurance that a significant number of clients will not switch
to the practice of requiring us to deposit all parking revenue
into their respective accounts, which would have a material
adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.
Our
management contracts and leases expose us to certain
risks.
The loss or renewal on less favorable terms of a substantial
number of management contracts or leases could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Because certain management contracts and leases
are with state, local and quasi-governmental entities, changes
to certain governmental entities approaches to contracting
regarding parking facilities could affect such contracts. A
material reduction in the operating income associated with the
integrated services we provide under management contracts and
leases could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. To the extent
that management contracts and leases are cancelable without
cause, most of these contracts would also be cancelable in the
event of our clients bankruptcy, despite the automatic
stay provisions under bankruptcy law.
In addition, we are particularly exposed to increases in costs
for locations that we operate under leases because we are
generally responsible for all the operating expenses of our
leased locations. An increase in cost of parking services could
reduce our gross profit derived from locations that we operate
under leases.
Our
indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations.
We cannot assure you that cash flow from operations, combined
with additional borrowings under the senior credit facility and
any future credit facility will be available in an amount
sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness, or to fund
other liquidity needs. We and our subsidiaries may be able to
incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, which
could
16
cause the related risks to intensify. We may need to refinance
all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before their
respective maturities. Recently, the credit markets and the
financial services industry experienced a period of
unprecedented turmoil characterized by the failure or sale of
various financial institutions and an unprecedented level of
intervention from the United States government. These
events could have a material adverse effect on us and our costs
of borrowings. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be
able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including our senior
credit facility, on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If
we are unable to refinance our debt, we may default under the
terms of our indebtedness, which could lead to an acceleration
of the debt. We do not expect that we could repay all of our
outstanding indebtedness if the repayment of such indebtedness
was accelerated.
We may
be unable to renew our insurance coverage and we do not maintain
insurance coverage for all possible risks.
Our liability and workers compensation insurance coverage
expires on an annual basis. There can be no assurance that our
insurance carriers will in fact be willing to renew our coverage
at any rate at the expiration date. We maintain a comprehensive
portfolio of insurance policies to help protect us against loss
or damage incurred from a wide variety of insurable risks. Each
year, we review with our professional insurance advisers whether
the insurance policies and associated coverages that we maintain
are sufficient to adequately protect us from the various types
of risk to which we are exposed in the ordinary course of
business. That analysis takes into account various pertinent
factors such as the likelihood that we would incur a material
loss from any given risk as well as the cost of obtaining
insurance coverage against any such risk. While we believe that
we maintain a comprehensive portfolio of insurance that is
consistent with customary business practices and adequately
protects us from the risks that we typically face in the
ordinary course of our business, there can be no assurance that
we may not sustain a material loss for which we do not maintain
any, or adequate insurance coverage.
Our
business would be harmed if fewer clients obtain liability
insurance coverage through us.
Many of our clients have historically chosen to obtain liability
insurance coverage for the locations we manage by being named as
additional insureds under our master insurance policies. Clients
do, however, have the option of purchasing such insurance
independently, as long as we are named as an additional insured
pursuant to an additional insured endorsement. We purchase
insurance policies at prices that we believe represent a
discount to the prices that would typically be charged to
parking facility owners on a stand-alone basis. Pursuant to our
management contracts, we allocate a portion of our risk
management costs, at rates we believe are competitive, to those
clients who choose to obtain their insurance coverage by being
named as additional insureds under our insurance policies. A
material reduction in the number of clients who choose to obtain
their insurance coverage from us in that manner, or a reduction
in amounts payable to us for such coverage, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Additional
funds would need to be reserved for future insurance losses if
such losses are worse than expected.
We provide liability and workers compensation insurance
coverage consistent with our obligations to our clients under
our various management contracts and leases. We are obligated to
reimburse our insurance carrier for each loss incurred in the
current policy year up to the amount of a deductible specified
in our insurance policies. The deductible for our various
liability and workers compensation policies is $250,000.
We also purchase property insurance that provides coverage for
loss or damage to our property, and in some cases our
clients property, as well as business interruption
coverage for lost operating income and certain associated
expenses. The deductible applicable to any given loss under our
property insurance policy varies based upon the insured values
and the peril that causes the loss. Our financial statements
reflect our funding of all such obligations based upon guidance
and evaluation we have received from third-party insurance
professionals. There can be no assurance, however, that the
ultimate amount of our obligations will not exceed the amount
presently funded or accrued, in which case we would need to set
aside additional funds to reserve for any such excess. Changes
in insurance reserves as a result of periodic evaluations of the
liabilities can cause swings in our operating results that may
not be indicative of the operations of our ongoing business.
Additionally, our obligations could increase if we receive a
greater number of insurance claims or if the severity of, or the
administrative costs associated with, those claims generally
increases. A material increase in insurance costs due to a
change in the number or severity of claims, claims costs or
premiums paid by us could have a material adverse effect on our
operating income.
Adverse
litigation judgments or settlements resulting from legal
proceedings in which we may be involved in the normal course of
our business could affect our operations and financial
condition.
In the normal course of business, we are from time to time
involved in various legal proceedings. We do not believe that
any pending claim, proceeding or litigation, either alone or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our
financial position; however, the outcome of these legal
proceedings cannot be predicted. It is possible that an
unfavorable outcome of some or all of the matters, including
claims related to the recent changes in our Board of Directors,
could cause us to incur substantial liabilities that may have a
material adverse effect upon our financial condition and results
of operations. Any
17
significant adverse litigation judgments or settlements could
have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Because
our business is affected by seasonal trends, typically in the
first quarter of each year, our results can fluctuate from
period to period, which could make it difficult to evaluate our
business or cause instability in the market price of our common
stock.
We periodically have experienced fluctuations in our quarterly
results arising from a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
reduced levels of travel during the first quarter of each year,
which is reflected in lower revenue from airport and hotel
parking; and
|
|
|
|
increases in certain costs of parking services, such as snow
removal.
|
These factors can reduce our gross profit in the first quarter.
As a result, our revenue and earnings in the second, third and
fourth quarters tend to be higher than revenue and earnings in
the first quarter. Accordingly, you should not consider our
first quarter results as indicative of results to be expected
for any other quarter or for any full fiscal year. Fluctuations
in our results could make it difficult to evaluate our business
or cause instability in the market price of our common stock.
We
operate in a very competitive business
environment.
Competition in the field of parking facility management is
intense. The market is fragmented and is served by a variety of
entities ranging from single lot operators to large regional and
national multi-facility operators, as well as municipal and
other governmental entities that choose not to outsource their
parking operations. Competitors may be able to adapt more
quickly to changes in customer requirements, or devote greater
resources to the promotion and sale of their products. Many of
our competitors also have long-standing relationships with our
clients. Providers of parking facility management services have
traditionally competed on the basis of cost and service. As we
have worked to establish ourselves as one of the principal
members of the industry, we compete predominately on the basis
of high levels of service and strong relationships. We may not
be able to, or may choose not to, compete with certain
competitors on the basis of price. As a result, a greater
proportion of our clients may switch to other service providers
or self-manage during an economic downturn.
Our
ability to expand our business will be dependent upon the
availability of adequate capital and economic
conditions.
The rate of our expansion will depend in part upon the
availability of adequate capital, which in turn will depend in
large part upon cash flow generated by our business and the
availability of equity and debt capital. The weak economy and
restrictive lending practices may make it more difficult to grow
our number of profitable locations and our ability to obtain
equity or debt capital on acceptable terms. However, we will
require the consent of stockholders holding a majority of shares
in order to authorize and issue additional shares of common
stock above the current number of shares of authorized capital
stock, which may be required in connection with any future
acquisitions. In addition, our senior credit facility contains
provisions that restrict our ability to incur additional
indebtedness
and/or
make
substantial investments or acquisitions. As a result, we cannot
assure you that we will be able to finance our current growth
strategy.
We
must comply with public and private regulations that may impose
significant costs on us.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws,
ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or
operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal
or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in
such property. These laws typically impose liability without
regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was
responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic
substances. In connection with the operation of parking
facilities, we may be potentially liable for such costs. In
addition, from time to time we are involved in environmental
issues at certain of locations or in connection with our
operations. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate
outcome of any of these matters, based on information currently
available, our management believes that none of these matters,
individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows. The cost of defending against claims
of liability, or remediation of a contaminated property, could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, several state
and local laws have been passed in recent years that encourage
car pooling and the use of mass transit. Laws and regulations
that reduce the number of cars and vehicles being driven could
adversely impact our business.
In connection with certain transportation services provided to
our clients, including shuttle bus operations, we provide the
vehicles and the drivers to operate these transportation
services. The U.S. Department of Transportation and various
state agencies exercise broad powers over these transportation
services, including, licensing and authorizations, safety and
insurance requirements. Our employee drivers must also comply
with the safety and fitness regulations promulgated by the
Department
18
Transportation, including those related to drug and alcohol
testing and service hours. We may become subject to new and more
restrictive federal and state regulations. Compliance with such
regulations could hamper our ability to provide qualified
drivers and increase our operating costs.
We are also subject to consumer credit laws and credit card
industry rules and regulations relating to the processing of
credit card transactions, including the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act and the Payment Card Data Security Standard.
This law and these industry standards impose substantial
financial penalties for non-compliance.
In addition, we are subject to laws generally applicable to
businesses, including but not limited to federal, state and
local regulations relating to wage and hour matters, employee
classification, mandatory healthcare benefits, unlawful
workplace discrimination and whistle blowing. Any actual or
alleged failure to comply with any regulation applicable to our
business or any whistle-blowing claim, even if without merit,
could result in costly litigation, regulatory action or
otherwise harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We collect and remit sales/parking taxes and file tax returns
for and on behalf of ourselves and our clients. We are affected
by laws and regulations that may impose a direct assessment on
us for failure to remit sales/parking taxes and filing of tax
returns for ourselves and on behalf of our clients.
We
believe that our public and private client base is becoming more
concentrated.
Because national property owners, managers and developers and
other property management companies tend to own or manage
multiple properties, our ability to provide parking services for
a large number of properties becomes dependent on our
relationships with these entities. As this ownership
concentration continues, such clients become more significant to
our business. The loss of one of these large clients or the sale
of properties they own to clients of our competitors could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. Additionally, large clients with
extensive portfolios have greater negotiating power with respect
to our management contracts and leases, which could adversely
affect our profit margins.
In order to raise additional revenue, a number of state and
municipal governments have either sold or entered into long-term
leases of public assets or may be contemplating such
transactions. The assets that are the subject of such
transactions have included government-owned parking garages
located in downtown commercial districts and parking operations
at airports. The sale or long-term leasing of such
government-owned parking assets to our competitors or clients of
our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The
failure to successfully complete or integrate acquisitions or
new contracts could have a negative impact on our
business.
We may pursue both small and large acquisitions in our business
or in new lines of business on a selective basis, and we may be
in discussions or negotiations with one or more of these
acquisitions or new contract candidates simultaneously. There
can be no assurance that suitable acquisitions or new contract
candidates will be identified, that such acquisitions or new
contracts will be consummated, that the acquired operations or
new contracts will be integrated successfully or that we will be
able to derive all of the expected synergies of acquired
operations or contracts.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including (but not limited
to) the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in integrating the operations, systems,
technologies and personnel of the acquired companies,
particularly companies with large and widespread operations.
|
|
|
|
Diversion of managements attention from normal daily
operations of the business and the challenges of managing larger
and more widespread operations resulting from acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in entering markets or businesses in which we have
no or limited direct prior experience and in which competitors
have stronger market positions.
|
|
|
|
Insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated
with acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
The potential loss of key employees, customers and other
business partners of the companies we acquire following and
continuing after announcement of acquisition plans and their
actual consummation.
|
Acquisitions may also cause us to:
|
|
|
|
|
Use a substantial portion of our cash resources or incur a
substantial amount of debt.
|
|
|
|
Temporarily increase costs, including general and administrative
cost, required to integrate acquisitions or large contract
portfolios.
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
Significantly increase our non-cash amortization expense.
|
|
|
|
Significantly increase our interest expense, leverage and debt
service requirements if we incur additional debt to pay for an
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Assume liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Issue common stock that would dilute our current
stockholders percentage ownership.
|
|
|
|
Record goodwill and
non-amortizable
intangible assets that are subject to impairment testing on a
regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges.
|
The actual costs or benefits of our acquisitions could differ
from the expected costs or benefits, and any such differences
could materially adversely affect our business. Mergers and
acquisitions of companies are inherently risky and subject to
many factors outside of our control and no assurance can be
given that our previous or future acquisitions will be
successful and will not materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Failure
to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could
materially harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The
sureties for our performance bond program may elect not to
provide us with new or renewal performance bonds for any
reason.
As is customary in the industry, a surety provider can refuse to
provide a bond principal with new or renewal surety bonds. If
any existing or future surety provider refuses to provide us
with surety bonds, there can be no assurance that we would be
able to find alternate providers on acceptable terms, or at all.
Our inability to provide surety bonds could also result in the
loss of existing contracts. Failure to find a provider of surety
bonds, and our resulting inability to bid for new contracts or
renew existing contracts, could have a material adverse effect
on our business and financial condition.
Our
business may be harmed as a result of extraordinary natural
disasters.
In 2005 Hurricane Katrina caused significant disruption to our
operations in New Orleans and the U.S. Gulf Coast region,
which adversely impacted our operating results for this region.
To the extent that we experience similar weather related events
in the U.S. Gulf Coast Region or in other geographical
areas where we operate, or experience other extraordinary
natural events, such as earthquakes, our operating results may
be adversely impacted.
Our
business may be harmed as a result of terrorist attacks and the
related increase in government regulation of airports and
reduced air travel.
Any terrorist attacks, particularly in the United States or
Canada, may negatively impact our business, financial condition
and results of operations. Attacks have resulted in, and may
continue to result in, increased government regulation of
airlines and airport facilities, including imposition of minimum
distances between parking facilities and terminals, resulting in
the elimination of currently managed parking facilities, and
increased security checks of employees and passengers at airport
facilities. We derive a significant percentage of our gross
profit from parking facilities and parking related services in
and around airports. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
approximately 23% of gross profit was derived from those
operations. The Federal Aviation Administration generally
prohibits parking within 300 feet of airport terminals
during periods of heightened security. While the prohibition is
not currently in effect, there can be no assurance that this
governmental prohibition will not again be reinstated. The
existing regulations governing parking within 300 feet of
airport terminals or future regulations may prevent us from
using certain parking spaces. Reductions in the number of
parking spaces and air travelers may reduce our revenue and cash
flow for both our leased facilities and those facilities we
operate under management contracts.
The
operation of our business is dependent upon key
personnel.
Our success is, and will continue to be, substantially dependent
upon the continued services of our executive management team.
The loss of the services of one or more of the members of our
executive management team could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations. Although
we have entered into employment agreements with, and
historically have been successful in retaining the services of,
our executive management, there can be no assurance that we will
be able to retain them in the future. In addition, our continued
growth depends upon our ability to attract and retain skilled
operating managers and employees.
Many
of our employees are covered by collective bargaining
agreements.
Approximately 28% of our employees are represented by labor
unions. Approximately 22% of our collective bargaining
contracts, representing approximately 3.7% of our employees, are
up for renewal in 2010. There can be no assurance that we will
be able to renew existing labor union contracts on acceptable
terms. Employees could exercise their rights under the labor
20
union contract, which could include a strike or walk-out. In
such cases, there are no assurances that we would be able to
staff sufficient employees for our short-term needs. Any such
labor strike or our inability to negotiate a satisfactory
contract upon expiration of the current agreements could have a
negative effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We make contributions to multiemployer benefit plans on behalf
of certain employees covered by collective bargaining agreements
and could be responsible for paying unfunded liabilities
incurred by such benefit plans, which amount could be material.
John
V. Holten, our past chairman and former majority stockholder,
may dispute our decision to terminate his employment with us,
which could result in legal or other proceedings that could
affect our operations and financial condition or divert the
attention of our management or our board of directors from our
business.
On October 5, 2009, we terminated Mr. Holtens
employment as chairman of our board of directors and we
determined not to make any further payments or provide any
further benefits to Mr. Holten. We took this action because
we believed that, under applicable law, the terms of the
agreement and the process by which Mr. Holten caused the
agreement to be executed and extended on our behalf were unfair
to us and that the agreement was not in the best interests of
our stockholders.
Mr. Holten has advised us that he disputes the termination
of his employment agreement and our determination that he is not
entitled to any further payments or benefits under the
agreement, and that he may assert a claim or claims against us
relating to the termination of the agreement. We believe we have
valid defenses to any claim by Mr. Holten, but we are
unable to state whether the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome
of any dispute is probable or remote. We are also unable to
provide an estimate of the range or amount of potential loss if
the outcome of any dispute or the settlement of any dispute is
unfavorable to us. However, an unfavorable outcome or the
settlement of any dispute related to the termination of
Mr. Holtens employment agreement with us could affect
our operations and financial condition or divert the attention
of our management or our board of directors from our business.
We intend to contest vigorously any claim by Mr. Holten.
Mr. Holten currently remains a member of our board of
directors.
Provisions
of our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
as amended, and third amended and restated by-laws and in
Delaware corporate law may prevent or discourage an acquisition
of our company that would benefit our
stockholders.
Provisions in our second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, as amended, and third amended and restated
by-laws and in Delaware corporate law may make it difficult and
expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in
control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management
and board of directors. For example, our second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and third
amended and restated by-laws provide for the inability of
stockholders to call special meetings, to increase the size of
the board of directors, requires stockholders to give advance
notice for director nominations and authorizes the issuance of
common stock without stockholder approval. In addition, as a
Delaware corporation, we are subject to certain Delaware
anti-takeover provisions, including the application of
Section 203 of the DGCL, which generally restricts our
ability to engage in a business combination with any holder of
15% or more of our capital stock. Our board of directors could
rely on provisions in our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, as amended, and third amended and
restated by-laws and in Delaware law to delay, deter or prevent
a change of control of our company, including through
transactions, and, in particular, unsolicited transactions, that
some or all of our stockholders might consider to be desirable
and through which some or all of our stockholders may obtain a
premium for their shares.
If
securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our
business or if they downgrade their evaluations of our stock or
estimates of our earnings, the price of our stock could
decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the
research, reports, expectations or other evaluations that
industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business.
If one or more of the analysts covering us downgrade their
estimates or evaluations of our stock or our earnings, or if we
fail to meet such expectations, the price of our stock could
decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our
company, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock,
which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
The
market price of our common stock may be particularly volatile,
and our stockholders may be unable to resell their shares at a
profit.
The market price of our common stock has been subject to
significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate or
decline. In the 52 weeks prior to the date of this report,
the closing prices of our common stock have ranged from a low of
$13.90 to a high of $20.31. The price of our common stock that
will prevail in the market may be higher or lower than the price
you pay, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our
control and may not be related to our operating
21
performance. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or
part of your investment in our common stock. Factors that could
cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the weak economy and turmoil in the credit markets and financial
services industry, including their impact on our results and our
ability to give accurate guidance;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic and business conditions or
demographic trends;
|
|
|
|
the financial difficulties or bankruptcy of our major clients,
including the impact on our ability to collect receivables;
|
|
|
|
availability, terms and deployment of capital;
|
|
|
|
the loss, or renewal on less favorable terms, of management
contracts and leases;
|
|
|
|
our ability to renew our insurance policies on acceptable terms,
the extent to which our clients choose to obtain insurance
coverage through us and our ability to successfully manage
self-insured losses;
|
|
|
|
adverse litigation judgments or settlements from legal or other
proceedings in which we may be involved; and
|
|
|
|
seasonal trends, particularly in the first quarter of each year;
|
|
|
|
the impact of public and private regulations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to form and maintain relationships with large real
estate owners, managers and developers;
|
|
|
|
integration of future acquisitions in light of challenges in
retaining key employees, synchronizing business processes,
efficiently integrating facilities, marketing and operations,
deriving the expected acquisition synergies or budgeting the
actual costs or benefits of acquistions;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain performance bonds on acceptable terms to
guarantee our performance under certain contracts;
|
|
|
|
extraordinary events affecting parking at facilities that we
manage, including emergency safety measures, military or
terrorist attacks and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
changes in federal and state regulations including those
affecting airports, parking lots at airports or automobile use;
|
|
|
|
the loss of key employees; and
|
|
|
|
development of new, competitive parking-related services.
|
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price
of a companys securities, securities class action
litigation has often been brought against that company. If our
stock price is volatile, we may become the target of securities
litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial
costs and divert our managements attention and resources
from our business.
22
Parking
Facilities
We operate parking facilities in 41 states and the District
of Columbia in the United States and four provinces of Canada.
We do not currently own any parking facilities. The following
table summarizes certain information regarding our facilities as
of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Locations
|
|
# of Spaces
|
States/Provinces
|
|
Airports and Urban Cities
|
|
Airport
|
|
Urban
|
|
Total
|
|
Airport
|
|
Urban
|
|
Total
|
|
Alabama
|
|
Airports and Birmingham
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
Alberta
|
|
Calgary, Edmonton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,663
|
|
|
|
15,663
|
|
Arizona
|
|
Phoenix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,501
|
|
|
|
13,501
|
|
British Columbia
|
|
Vancouver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
California
|
|
Airports, Beverly Hills, Encino,
Glendale, Long Beach, Los Angeles,
Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose,
Santa Monica and Woodland Hills
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
202,161
|
|
|
|
207,564
|
|
Colorado
|
|
Airports, Aurora, Colorado Springs,
and Denver
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
40,857
|
|
|
|
35,289
|
|
|
|
76,146
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Wilmington
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,329
|
|
|
|
5,329
|
|
Florida
|
|
Airports, Coral Gables, Ft. Myers,
Miami, Miami Beach, Orlando and
Tampa
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
14,956
|
|
|
|
38,124
|
|
|
|
53,080
|
|
Georgia
|
|
Airports and Atlanta
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
31,491
|
|
|
|
20,643
|
|
|
|
52,134
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
Airports, Aiea, Honolulu, Lahaina
and Waipahu
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
16,447
|
|
|
|
18,840
|
|
Idaho
|
|
Airport
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
Illinois
|
|
Airports, Chicago and Hoffman
Estates
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
37,366
|
|
|
|
103,673
|
|
|
|
141,039
|
|
Indiana
|
|
Airport
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
Kansas
|
|
Bonner Springs, Kansas City
and Topeka
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,817
|
|
|
|
13,817
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
Airports and Lexington
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
16,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,748
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
Airport, Metairie and New Orleans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
14,544
|
|
Maine
|
|
Airports and Portland
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
4,178
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
Maryland
|
|
Baltimore and Towson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
Boston, Cambridge, Chestnut Hill
and Hopkinton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,482
|
|
|
|
31,482
|
|
Michigan
|
|
Airports and Detroit
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Airport, Minneapolis and St. Paul
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
7,741
|
|
|
|
8,361
|
|
Missouri
|
|
Airports and Kansas City
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
25,802
|
|
|
|
37,213
|
|
|
|
63,015
|
|
Montana
|
|
Airports, Great Falls
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
Nevada
|
|
Las Vegas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
Hoboken, Jersey City, Paterson
and Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,615
|
|
|
|
16,615
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
Airport
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
New York
|
|
Airports, Bronx, Buffalo and New York City
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
38,156
|
|
|
|
49,721
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
Airport and Charlotte
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
10,477
|
|
|
|
11,880
|
|
North Dakota
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
Ohio
|
|
Airports, Akron, Cincinnati,
Cleveland, Columbus and Lakewood
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
10,695
|
|
|
|
90,404
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
Ontario
|
|
Airport, Hamilton, London, North
York and Toronto
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
43,383
|
|
|
|
45,458
|
|
Oregon
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
16,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,304
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
South Dakota
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
Airport, Memphis and Nashville
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
Texas
|
|
Airports, Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth
and Houston
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
8,512
|
|
|
|
81,680
|
|
|
|
90,192
|
|
Utah
|
|
Salt Lake City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
Virginia
|
|
Airports, Alexandria, Arlington, Fairfax and Richmond
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
9,702
|
|
|
|
35,953
|
|
|
|
45,655
|
|
Washington
|
|
Airports, Bellevue and Seattle
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
15,722
|
|
|
|
16,544
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
Airports and Milwaukee
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
6,351
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
Casper and Mills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
290,272
|
|
|
|
913,427
|
|
|
|
1,203,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
We have interests in twelve joint ventures, each of which
operates between one and thirty parking facilities. We are the
general partner of one limited partnership, which operates nine
parking facilities. For additional information, please see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Summary of
Operating Facilities.
Office
Leases
We lease approximately 24,000 square feet of office space
for our corporate offices in Chicago, Illinois. The lease
expires in 2013. We have a right of first opportunity on an
additional 24,000 square feet. We believe that the leased
facility, together with our expansion options, is adequate to
meet current and foreseeable future needs.
We also lease regional offices. These lease agreements generally
include renewal and expansion options, and we believe that these
facilities are adequate to meet our current and foreseeable
future needs.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought
against us and other loss contingencies are subject to
significant uncertainty. We accrue a charge against income when
our management determines that it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we accrue for the
authoritative judgments or assertions made against us by
government agencies at the time of their rendering regardless of
our intent to appeal. In determining the appropriate accounting
for loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss or
impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. We
regularly evaluate current information available to us to
determine whether an accrual should be established or adjusted.
Estimating the probability that a loss will occur and estimating
the amount of a loss or a range of loss involves significant
judgment.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol STAN. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices
for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market and its predecessor, adjusted for the effect of the
2-for-1
stock split in January 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
Sales Price
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
March 31
|
|
$
|
20.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.83
|
|
|
$
|
23.50
|
|
|
$
|
17.47
|
|
June 30
|
|
$
|
16.85
|
|
|
$
|
13.90
|
|
|
$
|
21.72
|
|
|
$
|
17.95
|
|
September 30
|
|
$
|
17.96
|
|
|
$
|
15.59
|
|
|
$
|
23.74
|
|
|
$
|
18.11
|
|
December 31
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
$
|
15.52
|
|
|
$
|
21.31
|
|
|
$
|
15.09
|
|
Holders
As of March 1, 2010, there were approximately 3,785 holders
of our common stock, based on the number of record holders of
our common stock and an estimate of the number of individual
participants represented by security position listings.
Dividends
We did not pay a cash dividend in respect of our common stock in
2009 or 2008. By the terms of our senior credit facility, we are
restricted from paying cash dividends on our capital stock while
such facility is in effect.
There are no restrictions on the ability of our wholly owned
subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to us.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
to be Based
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
for Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by securities holders
|
|
|
1,306,007
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
113,558
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,306,007
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
113,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Stock
Repurchases
In July 2008 our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase
shares of our common stock, on the open market or through
private purchases, up to $60 million in aggregate. As of
December 31, 2008, $22.9 million remained available
for repurchase under this authorization.
During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased
93,600 shares from third-party shareholders at an average
price of $18.23 per share, including average commissions of
$0.03 per share, on the open market. Our former majority
shareholder, an affiliate of John V. Holten, one of our
directors, sold 119,701 shares to us in the first quarter
of 2009 at an average price of $18.20 per share. The total value
of the first quarter transactions was $3.9 million. We
retired 200,650 shares during the first quarter of 2009 and
retired and the remaining 12,651 shares in April 2009.
We did not make any share repurchases in the second, third and
forth quarters of 2009.
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial data as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements,
which are included elsewhere herein. The table also presents
selected historical consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are not included
herein. The selected financial data set forth below should be
read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations
and the historical consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto for years 2009, 2008 and 2007 which are included
elsewhere herein. The historical results do not necessarily
indicate results expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
140,441
|
|
|
$
|
154,311
|
|
|
$
|
145,327
|
|
|
$
|
153,336
|
|
|
$
|
154,099
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
153,382
|
|
|
|
145,828
|
|
|
|
119,612
|
|
|
|
106,554
|
|
|
|
93,876
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
356,782
|
|
|
|
346,055
|
|
|
|
338,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
695,494
|
|
|
|
700,760
|
|
|
|
621,721
|
|
|
|
605,945
|
|
|
|
586,654
|
|
Cost of parking services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
130,897
|
|
|
|
140,058
|
|
|
|
129,550
|
|
|
|
139,043
|
|
|
|
141,037
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
84,167
|
|
|
|
69,285
|
|
|
|
49,726
|
|
|
|
44,990
|
|
|
|
37,101
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
356,782
|
|
|
|
346,055
|
|
|
|
338,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services
|
|
|
616,735
|
|
|
|
609,964
|
|
|
|
536,058
|
|
|
|
530,088
|
|
|
|
516,817
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
14,253
|
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
|
|
14,293
|
|
|
|
13,062
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
69,215
|
|
|
|
76,543
|
|
|
|
69,886
|
|
|
|
61,564
|
|
|
|
56,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
78,759
|
|
|
|
90,796
|
|
|
|
85,663
|
|
|
|
75,857
|
|
|
|
69,837
|
|
General and administrative expenses(1)
|
|
|
44,707
|
|
|
|
47,619
|
|
|
|
44,796
|
|
|
|
41,228
|
|
|
|
39,822
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,828
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
5,638
|
|
|
|
6,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28,224
|
|
|
|
37,118
|
|
|
|
35,532
|
|
|
|
28,991
|
|
|
|
23,588
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
|
|
9,398
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
22,480
|
|
|
|
30,815
|
|
|
|
29,086
|
|
|
|
21,247
|
|
|
|
15,031
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)(2)
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
(14,880
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
17,819
|
|
|
|
36,127
|
|
|
|
15,045
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(3)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
$
|
17,373
|
|
|
$
|
35,751
|
|
|
$
|
14,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8,256
|
|
|
$
|
8,301
|
|
|
$
|
8,466
|
|
|
$
|
8,058
|
|
|
$
|
10,777
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
240,505
|
|
|
|
229,241
|
|
|
|
215,388
|
|
|
|
212,528
|
|
|
|
201,353
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
113,211
|
|
|
|
125,064
|
|
|
|
80,363
|
|
|
|
85,665
|
|
|
|
92,108
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock, series D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
39,339
|
|
|
|
41,253
|
|
|
|
24,412
|
|
25
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes for 2005 $900 for valuation allowance related to
long-term receivables.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for 2006 includes a reduction in
the valuation allowance for net operating loss carryforwards and
other deferred tax assets of $23,924.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the retrospective adoption, effective January 1,
2009, of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification Topic 810,
Consolidation
(formerly
FAS 160) (ASC 810). Upon adoption of ASC 810,
we reclassified minority interests in our consolidated balance
sheet from accrued expenses to noncontrolling interests in the
equity section. Additionally, we changed the way noncontrolling
interests are presented within the consolidated statement of
income such that the statement of income reflects results
attributable to both our interests and noncontrolling interests.
While the accounting provisions of ASC 810 are being applied
prospectively beginning January 1, 2009, the presentation
and disclosure requirements have been applied retrospectively.
The results attributable to our interests did not change upon
the adoption of ASC 810.
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion of our results of operations should
be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial
Data and our consolidated financial statements and the
related notes included elsewhere herein. This discussion
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set
forth in Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere
herein.
Overview
Our
Business
We manage parking facilities in urban markets and at airports
across the United States and in four Canadian provinces. We do
not own any facilities, but instead enter into contractual
relationships with property owners or managers.
We operate our clients properties through two types of
arrangements: management contracts and leases. Under a
management contract, we typically receive a base monthly fee for
managing the facility, and we may also receive an incentive fee
based on the achievement of facility performance objectives. We
also receive fees for ancillary services. Typically, all of the
underlying revenues and expenses under a standard management
contract flow through to our clients rather than to us. However,
some management contracts, which are referred to as
reverse management contracts, usually provide for
larger management fees and require us to pay various costs.
Under lease arrangements, we generally pay to the property owner
either a fixed annual rent, a percentage of gross customer
collections or a combination thereof. We collect all revenues
under lease arrangements and we are responsible for most
operating expenses, but we are typically not responsible for
major maintenance, capital expenditures or real estate taxes.
Margins for lease contracts vary significantly, not only due to
operating performance, but also due to variability of parking
rates in different cities and varying space utilization by
parking facility type and location. As of December 31,
2009, we operated 90% of our locations under management
contracts and 10% under leases.
In evaluating our financial condition and operating performance,
managements primary focus is on our gross profit, total
general and administrative expense and general and
administrative expense as a percentage of our gross profit.
Although the underlying economics to us of management contracts
and leases are similar, the manner in which we are required to
account for them differs. Revenue from leases includes all gross
customer collections derived from our leased locations (net of
parking tax), whereas revenue from management contracts only
includes our contractually agreed upon management fees and
amounts attributable to ancillary services. Gross customer
collections at facilities under management contracts, therefore,
are not included in our revenue. Accordingly, while a change in
the proportion of our operating agreements that are structured
as leases versus management contracts may cause significant
fluctuations in reported revenue and expense of parking
services, that change will not artificially affect our gross
profit. For example, as of December 31, 2009, 90% of our
locations were operated under management contracts and 88% of
our gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
derived from management contracts. Only 52% of total revenue
(excluding reimbursed management contract expenses), however,
was from management contracts because under those contracts the
revenue collected from parking customers belongs to our clients.
Therefore, gross profit and total general and administrative
expense, rather than revenue, are managements primary
focus.
General
Business Trends
We believe that sophisticated commercial real estate developers
and property managers and owners recognize the potential for
parking and related services to be a profit generator rather
than a cost center. Often, the parking experience makes both the
first and the last impressions on their properties tenants
and visitors. By outsourcing these services, they are able to
capture additional profit by leveraging the unique operational
skills and controls that an experienced parking management
company can
26
offer. Our ability to consistently deliver a uniformly high
level of parking and related services and maximize the profit to
our clients improves our ability to win contracts and retain
existing locations. Our location retention rate for the twelve
month periods ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008 was 87% and 89%, respectively, which also reflects our
decision not to renew, or terminate, unprofitable contracts.
For the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, average gross profit per location
decreased 9.8% from $41.0 thousand to $37.0 thousand, primarily
due to the economic recession, a negative fluctuation in prior
years insurance reserve adjustments, the tentative settlement of
and the legal fees related to the California labor code case, in
addition to the Hurricane Katrina settlement received in 2008
that did not recur in 2009.
Summary
of Operating Facilities
We focus our operations in core markets where a concentration of
locations improves customer service levels and operating
margins. The following table reflects our facilities operated at
the end of the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Managed facilities
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
Leased facilities
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total facilities
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
We recognize parking services revenue from lease and management
contracts as the related services are provided. Substantially
all of our revenues come from the following two sources:
|
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue lease
contracts.
Parking services revenues related to
lease contracts consist of all revenue received at a leased
facility, including parking receipts (net of parking tax),
consulting and real estate development fees, gains on sales of
contracts and payments for exercising termination rights.
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue management
contracts.
Management contract revenue consists
of management fees, including both fixed and performance-based
fees, and amounts attributable to ancillary services such as
accounting, equipment leasing, payments received for exercising
termination rights, consulting, development fees, gains on sales
of contracts, insurance and other value-added services with
respect to managed locations. We believe we generally purchase
required insurance at lower rates than our clients can obtain on
their own because we effectively self-insure for all liability
and workers compensation claims by maintaining a large
per-claim deductible. As a result, we have generated operating
income on the insurance provided under our management contracts
by focusing on our risk management efforts and controlling
losses. Management contract revenues do not include gross
customer collections at the managed locations as this revenue
belongs to the property owner rather than to us. Management
contracts generally provide us with a management fee regardless
of the operating performance of the underlying facility.
|
Conversions between type of contracts, lease or management, are
typically determined by our clients and not us. Although the
underlying economics to us of management contracts and leases
are similar, the manner in which we account for them differs
substantially.
Reimbursed
Management Contract Expense
Reimbursed of management contract expense consists of the direct
reimbursement from the property owner for operating expenses
incurred under a management contract, which is reflected in our
revenue.
Cost
of Parking Services
Our cost of parking services consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease
contracts.
The cost of parking services under a
lease arrangement consists of contractual rental fees paid to
the facility owner and all operating expenses incurred in
connection with operating the leased facility. Contractual fees
paid to the facility owner are generally based on either a fixed
contractual amount or a percentage of gross revenue or a
combination thereof. Generally, under a lease arrangement we are
not responsible for major capital expenditures or real estate
taxes.
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services management
contracts.
The cost of parking services under a
management contract is generally the responsibility of the
facility owner. As a result, these costs are not included in our
results of operations.
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
However, our reverse management contracts, which typically
provide for larger management fees, do require us to pay for
certain costs.
|
Reimbursed
Management Contract Expense
Reimbursed management contract expense consists of direct
reimbursed costs incurred on behalf of property owners under a
management contract, which is reflected in our cost of parking
services.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit equals our revenue less the cost of generating such
revenue. This is the key metric we use to examine our
performance because it captures the underlying economic benefit
to us of both lease contracts and management contracts.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses include salaries, wages,
payroll taxes, insurance, travel and office related expenses for
our headquarters, field offices, supervisory employees, chairman
of the board and board of directors.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation is determined using a straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the various asset classes or in the
case of leasehold improvements, over the initial term of the
operating lease or its useful life, whichever is shorter.
Intangible assets determined to have finite lives are amortized
over their remaining useful life.
Seasonality
During the first quarter of each year, seasonality impacts our
performance with regard to moderating revenues, with the reduced
levels of travel most clearly reflected in the parking activity
associated with our airport and hotel businesses as well as
increases in certain costs of parking services, such as snow
removal, both of which negatively affect gross profit. Although
our revenues and profitability are affected by the seasonality
of the business, general and administrative costs are relatively
stable throughout the fiscal year. See Item 6,
Selected Financial Data, for further information.
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Segments
An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise
that engages in business activities from which it may earn
revenue and incur expenses, and about which separate financial
information is regularly evaluated by our chief operating
decision maker, in deciding how to allocate resources. Our chief
operating decision maker is our president and chief executive
officer.
Our business is managed based on regions administered by
executive vice presidents. The following is a summary of
revenues (excluding reimbursed management contract expense) by
region for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Information related to prior years has been recast to conform to
the current regional alignment.
Region One encompasses Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, and
Wisconsin.
Region Two encompasses our Canadian operations, event and
transportation planning, and our technology based parking and
traffic management systems.
Region Three encompasses Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii,
Louisiana, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
Region Four encompasses all major airport and transportation
operations nationwide.
Other consists of ancillary revenue that is not specifically
identifiable to a region and reserve adjustments related to
prior years.
28
The following tables present the material factors that impact
our financial statements on an operating segment basis.
Segment revenue information is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Lease contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
(76.5
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.0
|
|
|
|
121.5
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(63.4
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease contract revenue
|
|
$
|
79.0
|
|
|
$
|
83.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
39.3
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
140.4
|
|
|
$
|
154.3
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
178.4
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
|
(70.7
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
117.7
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total management contract revenue
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
|
$
|
32.4
|
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
153.4
|
|
|
$
|
145.8
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue lease
contracts.
Lease contract revenue decreased
$13.9 million, or 9.0%, to $140.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $154.3 million in
the year-ago period. The decrease resulted primarily from
contract expirations exceeding increases in revenue from new
locations, and fewer leased contracts that converted from
management contracts during the current year, partially offset
by increases in revenue from our acquisitions. Same location
revenue for those facilities, which as of December 31, 2009
have been operational a minimum of 24 months, decreased
5.3%. The decrease in same location revenue was due to decreases
in short-term parking revenue of $4.3 million, or 5.1%, and
a decrease in monthly parking revenue of $2.2 million, or
5.9%. Revenue associated with contract expirations relates to
contracts that expired during the current period. In addition,
we recorded $1.4 million in 2008 related to the Hurricane
Katrina settlement, which was included in contract expirations.
Parking services revenue management
contracts.
Management contract revenue increased
$7.6 million, or 5.2%, to $153.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $145.8 million in
the year-ago period. The increase resulted primarily from new
locations and acquisitions, which was partially offset by the
decrease in revenue from contract expirations. Same locations
revenue for those facilities, which as of December 31, 2009
have been operational a minimum of 24 months, increased
8.1%. In 2008, we recorded $0.2 million related to the
Hurricane Katrina settlement, which was included in contract
expirations.
Reimbursed management contract
expense.
Reimbursed management contract expenses
increased $1.1 million, or 0.3%, to $401.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$400.6 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursements for costs incurred on
behalf of owners.
Regions one, two, three and four recorded a decrease in same
location revenue and contract expirations, partially offset by
increases in revenue from new locations. Same location revenue
decreased compared to prior year primarily due to a reduction in
short-term and monthly parking revenue. Contract expirations in
region three includes the $1.4 million Hurricane Katrina
settlement received in 2008 that did not recur in 2009.
Regions one, two, three and four recorded increases in
management contract revenue from new locations compared to the
prior year. Regions one, two and three recorded increases in
management contract revenue from same locations and acquisitions
compared to the prior year, primarily due to the addition of new
services to existing contracts. These increases were partially
offset by decreases in contract expirations primarily in region
one. Revenue associated with contract expirations relates to the
contracts that expired during the current period. Contract
expirations in region three includes the $0.2 million
Hurricane Katrina settlement received in 2008 that did not recur
in 2009.
29
Segment cost of parking services information is summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
155.6
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
|
(73.2
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
106.6
|
|
|
|
111.5
|
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(60.0
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services lease contracts
|
|
$
|
73.8
|
|
|
$
|
76.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
36.9
|
|
|
$
|
40.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
130.9
|
|
|
$
|
140.1
|
|
|
$
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
184.0
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
(63.2
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
64.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services management contracts
|
|
$
|
25.6
|
|
|
$
|
27.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
33.2
|
|
|
$
|
26.4
|
|
|
$
|
17.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
$
|
69.3
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease
contracts.
Cost of parking services for lease
contracts decreased $9.2 million, or 6.6%, to
$130.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $140.1 million in the year-ago period. The
decrease resulted primarily from decreases in costs from
contract expirations and fewer locations that converted from
management contracts during the current year, which more than
offset the increases in new locations. Same locations costs for
those facilities which as of December 31, 2009 have been
operational a minimum of 24 months decreased 4.4%. Same
location costs decreased $4.1 million due to rent expense,
primarily as a result of contingent rental payments on the
decrease in revenue for same locations, $0.6 million due to
payroll and payroll related and $0.2 million related to
other operating costs.
Cost of parking services management
contracts.
Cost of parking services for
management contracts increased $14.9 million, or 21.5%, to
$84.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $69.3 million in the year-ago period. The
increase resulted from new locations and acquisitions which more
than offset the decrease in costs from contract expirations.
There was no impact on costs for those management contracts
which converted to a lease contract. Same location costs for
those facilities, which as of December 31, 2009 have been
operational a minimum of 24 months, increased 29.5%. Same
location increase in operating expenses for management contracts
primarily resulted from negative fluctuations in prior years
insurance reserve adjustments, increases in costs associated
with reverse management contracts where we are responsible for
certain expenses in return for a larger management fee, and the
cost of providing management services, in addition to
$3.1 million attributable to the tentative settlement and
legal fees related to a California labor code case.
Reimbursed management contract
expense.
Reimbursed management contract expense
increased $1.1 million, or 0.3%, to $401.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$400.6 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursed cost incurred on the behalf
of owners.
Regions one, three and four experienced decreases in cost of
parking services lease contracts related to same locations. Same
location costs decreased primarily due to decreases in rent
expense primarily as a result of contingent rental payments on
the decrease in revenue for same locations and a reduction in
payroll and payroll related. Regions one and three experienced
declines in contract expirations. Cost associated with contract
expirations related to contracts that expired during the current
period.
Cost of parking services management contracts primarily
increased due to costs associated with reverse management
contracts and the cost of providing management services for same
and new locations. Included in region three same locations is
$3.1 million attributable to the tentative settlement and
legal fees related to a California labor code case recorded in
2009. The other region amounts in same location costs primarily
represent prior year insurance reserve adjustments.
30
Segment gross profit/gross profit percentage information is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross profit lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(92.9
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(83.3
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit lease contracts
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
(40.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Gross profit management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
173.1
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
(80.0
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit management contracts
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
$
|
29.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
69.2
|
|
|
$
|
76.5
|
|
|
$
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
(633.3
|
)
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
(633.3
|
)
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit lease
contracts.
Gross profit for lease contracts
decreased $4.7 million, or 33.1%, to $9.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$14.2 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for lease contracts decreased to 6.8% for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to 9.2% in the year-ago
period. Gross profit lease contracts decreases on same locations
were primarily the result of decreased short-term and monthly
parking revenue as described under parking services revenue
leased contracts. Gross profit lease contracts decreases on
conversions were primarily the result of fewer leased contracts
that converted from management contracts during the current year.
Gross profit management
contracts.
Gross profit for management contracts
decreased $7.3 million, or 9.5%, to $69.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$76.5 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for management contracts decreased to 45.1% for the
year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 52.5% in the
year-ago period. Gross profit for management contracts decreases
were primarily the result of our same locations and our contract
expirations. Gross profit management contracts decreases on same
locations were primarily the result of increased costs resulting
from negative fluctuations in prior year insurance reserve
adjustments, increases in costs associated with reverse
management contracts where we are responsible for certain
expenses in return for a larger management fee, and the cost of
providing management services, in addition to $3.1 million
attributable to the tentative settlement and legal fees related
to a California labor code case.
Regions one, two, three and four experienced declines in gross
profit lease contracts due to same locations primarily due to a
decline in short-term and monthly parking revenue that exceeded
the decline in costs. Region three experienced a decline in
gross profit contract expirations due to the Hurricane Katrina
settlement recorded in revenue for 2008 that did not recur in
2009.
Regions three and four experienced declines in gross profit
management contracts related to same locations, which is
primarily due to an increase in costs associated with reverse
management contracts and the cost of providing management
services, in addition to the tentative settlement and legal fees
related to a California labor code case in region three that was
31
recorded in cost of parking services in 2009. Region three
experienced a decline in gross profit contract expirations due
to the Hurricane Katrina settlement recorded in revenue in 2008
that did not recur in 2009.
Segment general and administrative expenses information is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
19.0
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
$
|
47.6
|
|
|
$
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses.
General
and administrative expenses decreased $2.9 million, or
6.1%, to $44.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2009, compared to $47.6 million in the year-ago period.
This decrease resulted from decreases in net payroll and payroll
related expenses of $2.4 million, a decrease in travel of
$0.5 million, a decrease in computer expenses of
$0.7 million, an increase in cost recovery of
$0.6 million, a decrease of $0.4 million related to
outsourcing fees, decreases in other costs of $0.4 million,
which was partially offset by $1.7 million incurred in
connection with the Companys transfer and secondary
offering of its former controlling shareholders shares,
and $0.4 million related to the Hurricane Katrina
settlement received in 2008 that did not recur in 2009.
General and administrative expenses on a segment basis represent
direct administrative costs for each region. The other region
consists primarily of the corporate headquarters. The other
region decreased primarily due to payroll and payroll related
expenses, partially offset by fees incurred in connection with
the Companys transfer and secondary offering of its former
controlling shareholders shares. Region one decreased
primarily due to payroll and payroll related and legal fees,
partially offset by computer expenses. Region two decreased
primarily due to payroll and payroll related expenses. Region
three increased primarily due to legal fees, partially offset by
the Hurricane Katrina settlement received in 2008 that did not
recur in 2009. Region four increased slightly due to payroll and
payroll related expenses.
Interest expense.
Interest expense decreased
$0.5 million, or 7.7%, to $6.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $6.5 million
in the year-ago period. This decrease resulted primarily from a
decrease in borrowings.
Interest income.
Interest income was
$0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
did not change significantly from the year-ago period.
Income tax expense.
Income tax expense
decreased $3.3 million, or 28.4%, to $8.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to
$11.6 million in the year-ago period. This decrease
resulted principally from taxes on decreased earnings as well as
a reduction in our effective tax rate. The effective tax rate
for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 36.8% compared to
37.7% for the year-ago period.
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Segments
The following tables present the material factors that impact
our financial statements on an operating segment basis.
Segment revenue information is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Lease contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
272.0
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(53.4
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.6
|
|
|
|
124.7
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
(38.6
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
720.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease contract revenue
|
|
$
|
83.3
|
|
|
$
|
70.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
27.7
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
154.3
|
|
|
$
|
145.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.2
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
(53.4
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
102.9
|
|
|
|
91.8
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
384.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total management contract revenue
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
52.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
|
$
|
42.4
|
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
24.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
145.8
|
|
|
$
|
119.6
|
|
|
$
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Parking services revenue lease
contracts.
Lease contract revenue increased
$9.0 million, or 6.2%, to $154.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, compared to $145.3 million in
the year-ago period. The increase resulted primarily from our
acquisitions, revenue from new locations exceeding decreases in
revenue from contract expirations and fewer leased contracts
that converted from management contracts during the current
year. Same location revenue for those facilities, which as of
December 31, 2008 have been operational a minimum of
24 months, increased 2.3%. Revenue associated with contract
expirations relates to contracts that expired during the current
period. In addition, we recorded $1.4 million in 2008
related to the Hurricane Katrina settlement, which was included
in contract expirations.
Parking services revenue management
contracts.
Management contract revenue increased
$26.2 million, or 21.9%, to $145.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$119.6 million in the year-ago period. The increase
resulted primarily from new locations and acquisitions which
more than offset the decrease in revenue from contract
expirations. Same locations revenue for those facilities, which
as of December 31, 2008 have been operational a minimum of
24 months, increased 12.1%. In addition, we recorded
$0.2 million related to the Hurricane Katrina settlement,
which was included in contract expirations.
Reimbursed management contract
expense.
Reimbursed management contract expenses
increased $43.8 million, or 12.3%, to $400.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$356.8 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursements for costs incurred on
behalf of owners.
Regions one, two and three recorded an increase in new location
leases, and region one experienced increases in same location
revenue at a rate that approximated our average. The client base
for region four currently prefers the structure of management
contracts to lease contracts, therefore no new lease contracts
were operational in 2008 and 2007.
Regions one, two, three and four recorded management contract
new business revenue that exceeded any decreases in revenue from
contract expirations. Same location revenue increased in region
one due to several contracts adding ancillary services.
Segment cost of parking services information is summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
275.0
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(65.5
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
59.7
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
117.3
|
|
|
|
113.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(39.2
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
711.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services lease contracts
|
|
$
|
76.8
|
|
|
$
|
64.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
|
$
|
40.2
|
|
|
$
|
40.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
140.1
|
|
|
$
|
129.6
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
164.9
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(52.8
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
416.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services management contracts
|
|
$
|
27.7
|
|
|
$
|
22.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
26.4
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
69.3
|
|
|
$
|
49.7
|
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease
contracts.
Cost of parking services for lease
contracts increased $10.5 million, or 8.1%, to
$140.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to $129.6 million in the year-ago period. The
increase resulted primarily from new locations and acquisitions
which more than offset the decreases in costs from contract
expirations and fewer locations that converted from management
contracts during the current year. Same locations costs for
those facilities which as of December 31, 2008 have been
operational a minimum of 24 months increased 3.7%. Same
location rent expense for lease contracts increased primarily as
a result of contingent rental payments on the increase in
revenue for same locations. The increase in other operating
costs for lease contracts primarily result from increases in
snow removal costs and garage supplies.
Cost of parking services management
contracts.
Cost of parking services for
management contracts increased $19.6 million, or 39.4%, to
$69.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to $49.7 million in the year-ago
33
period. The increase resulted primarily from new locations and
acquisitions which more than offset the decrease in costs from
contract expirations. There was no impact on costs for those
management contracts which converted to a lease contract. Same
location costs for those facilities, which as of
December 31, 2008 have been operational a minimum of
24 months, increased 33.2%. Same location increase in
operating expenses for management contracts primarily result
from increases in snow removal costs and garage supplies.
Reimbursed management contract
expense.
Reimbursed management contract expense
increased $43.8 million, or 12.3%, to $400.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$356.8 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursed cost incurred on the behalf
of owners.
Region one has the highest proportion of lease contracts and
this region covers states that are impacted to a greater extent
by weather related costs such as snow removal costs, which are
our responsibility.
Regions one, three and four experienced same location increases
in cost that approximated the aggregate amount, with no
significant variances between them. The other region amounts in
same location costs primarily represent prior year insurance
reserve adjustments.
Segment lease contract gross profit/gross profit percentage
information is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross profit lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(30.0
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(33.3
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
800.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit lease contracts
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
154.5
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
(200.0
|
)
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Gross profit management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
320.8
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(54.3
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
328.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit management contracts
|
|
$
|
29.7
|
|
|
$
|
29.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
23.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
76.5
|
|
|
$
|
69.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240.0
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
(33.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
93.5
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
|
(633.3
|
)
|
|
|
(109.1
|
)
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
(633.3
|
)
|
|
|
(109.1
|
)
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Gross profit lease
contracts.
Gross profit for lease contracts
decreased $1.5 million, or 9.6%, to $14.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$15.7 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for lease contracts decreased to 9.2% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, compared to 10.8% in the year-ago
period. Gross profit lease contracts decreases on same locations
were primarily the result of increases in other operating costs
as described under the cost of parking services lease contracts.
Gross profit percentage on acquisitions were higher than our
average for lease contracts however, were not sufficient to
offset the decline in same locations.
Gross profit management
contracts.
Gross profit for management contracts
increased $6.6 million, or 9.4%, to $76.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$69.9 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for management contracts decreased to 52.5% for the
year ended December 31, 2008, compared to 58.4% in the
year-ago period. Gross profit for management contracts increases
were primarily the result of our new locations and our
acquisitions. Gross profit percentage on same locations
accounted for most of the decline on a percentage basis.
Gross profit for lease contracts for regions one and four
experienced declines in same location profit primarily due to
the increase in operating costs.
Gross profit for management contracts increased in regions one,
two, three and four primarily due to the addition of new
locations and gross margin from same locations being comparable
to the prior year. In addition, acquisitions were a positive
contributor to our results. The other region declined in gross
profit percentage due to changes in prior years insurance
reserve activity.
Segment general and administrative expenses information is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
$
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
$
|
47.6
|
|
|
$
|
44.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses.
General
and administrative expenses increased $2.8 million, or
6.2%, to $47.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2008, compared to $44.8 million in the year-ago period.
This increase resulted from increases in payroll and payroll
related expenses of $1.7 million, increases resulting from
acquisitions of $1.2 million and a $0.1 decrease in other
operating expenses, which included $0.4 million from the
Hurricane Katrina settlement.
General and administrative expenses on a segment basis represent
direct administrative costs for each region. The other region
consists primarily of the corporate headquarters. The increase
in region one is due primarily to our investment in additional
business development infrastructure.
Interest expense.
Interest expense decreased
$0.6 million, or 8.5%, to $6.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $7.1 million
in the year-ago period. This decrease resulted primarily from
the decrease in the borrowing rate on our senior credit facility.
Interest income.
Interest income decreased
$0.4 million, or 66.7%, to $0.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $0.6 million
in the year-ago period. This decrease resulted from reduction of
repayments received in 2007 for interest bearing guarantor
payments related to Bradley International Airport.
Income tax expense.
Income tax expense
increased $0.3 million, or 2.7%, to $11.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to
$11.3 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from taxes on increased earnings partially offset by a
reduction in our effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for
the year ended December 31, 2008 was 37.9% compared to
39.3% for the year-ago period.
35
Unaudited
Quarterly Results
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
consolidated statement of income data for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The unaudited
quarterly information has been prepared on the same basis as the
annual financial information and, in managements opinion,
includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the information for the
quarters presented. Historically, our revenues and operating
results have varied from quarter to quarter and are expected to
continue to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations have
been due to a number of factors, including: general economic
conditions in our markets; additions of contracts; expiration
and termination of contracts; conversion of lease contracts to
management contracts; conversion of management contracts to
lease contracts and changes in terms of contracts that are
retained. The operating results for any historical quarter are
not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarters Ended
|
|
|
2008 Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Parking services revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
34,700
|
|
|
$
|
35,687
|
|
|
$
|
35,576
|
|
|
$
|
34,478
|
|
|
$
|
37,694
|
|
|
$
|
40,003
|
|
|
$
|
38,634
|
|
|
$
|
37,980
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
38,293
|
|
|
|
37,311
|
|
|
|
39,266
|
|
|
|
38,512
|
|
|
|
35,880
|
|
|
|
36,415
|
|
|
|
36,858
|
|
|
|
36,675
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
102,558
|
|
|
|
97,595
|
|
|
|
97,480
|
|
|
|
104,038
|
|
|
|
99,451
|
|
|
|
99,317
|
|
|
|
101,919
|
|
|
|
99,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
175,551
|
|
|
|
170,593
|
|
|
|
172,322
|
|
|
|
177,028
|
|
|
|
173,025
|
|
|
|
175,735
|
|
|
|
177,411
|
|
|
|
174,589
|
|
Cost of parking services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
32,949
|
|
|
|
32,932
|
|
|
|
32,899
|
|
|
|
32,117
|
|
|
|
34,893
|
|
|
|
34,711
|
|
|
|
35,506
|
|
|
|
34,948
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
20,391
|
|
|
|
19,938
|
|
|
|
20,696
|
|
|
|
23,142
|
|
|
|
17,046
|
|
|
|
18,162
|
|
|
|
16,510
|
|
|
|
17,567
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
102,558
|
|
|
|
97,595
|
|
|
|
97,480
|
|
|
|
104,038
|
|
|
|
99,451
|
|
|
|
99,317
|
|
|
|
101,919
|
|
|
|
99,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services
|
|
|
155,898
|
|
|
|
150,465
|
|
|
|
151,075
|
|
|
|
159,297
|
|
|
|
151,390
|
|
|
|
152,190
|
|
|
|
153,935
|
|
|
|
152,449
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
2,677
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
5,292
|
|
|
|
3,128
|
|
|
|
3,032
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
17,902
|
|
|
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
18,570
|
|
|
|
15,370
|
|
|
|
18,834
|
|
|
|
18,253
|
|
|
|
20,348
|
|
|
|
19,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
19,653
|
|
|
|
20,128
|
|
|
|
21,247
|
|
|
|
17,731
|
|
|
|
21,635
|
|
|
|
23,545
|
|
|
|
23,476
|
|
|
|
22,140
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
10,320
|
|
|
|
11,295
|
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
|
11,411
|
|
|
|
12,029
|
|
|
|
12,017
|
|
|
|
12,162
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
5,405
|
|
|
|
8,395
|
|
|
|
8,370
|
|
|
|
6,054
|
|
|
|
8,853
|
|
|
|
9,937
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
8,408
|
|
Other expense (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
6,962
|
|
|
|
6.878
|
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
7,377
|
|
|
|
8,892
|
|
|
|
8,249
|
|
|
|
6,297
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
2,692
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
4,270
|
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
|
$
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
5,105
|
|
|
$
|
4,409
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
2,398
|
|
|
$
|
4,228
|
|
|
$
|
4,186
|
|
|
$
|
3,280
|
|
|
$
|
4,277
|
|
|
$
|
5,277
|
|
|
$
|
5,109
|
|
|
$
|
4,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
15,296,282
|
|
|
|
15,251,310
|
|
|
|
15,277,601
|
|
|
|
15,346,452
|
|
|
|
18,122,846
|
|
|
|
17,891,155
|
|
|
|
17,244,932
|
|
|
|
16,041,375
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
15,628,952
|
|
|
|
15,601,643
|
|
|
|
15,696,136
|
|
|
|
15,755,494
|
|
|
|
18,534,770
|
|
|
|
18,265,653
|
|
|
|
17,694,208
|
|
|
|
16,430,630
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Share and per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted for
the effect of the
2-for-1
stock split in January 2008. See Note A for additional
information.
|
36
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Outstanding
Indebtedness
On December 31, 2009, we had total indebtedness of
approximately $113.2 million, a decrease of
$11.9 million from December 31, 2008. The
$113.2 million includes:
|
|
|
|
|
$109.9 million under our senior credit facility; and
|
|
|
|
$3.3 million of other debt including capital lease
obligations and obligations on seller notes and other
indebtedness.
|
We believe that our cash flow from operations, combined with
additional borrowing capacity under our senior credit facility,
which amounted to $15.8 million at December 31, 2009,
will be sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, or to
fund other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a
portion of our indebtedness on or before their respective
maturities. We believe that we will be able to refinance our
indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms.
Senior
Credit Facility
On July 15, 2008, we amended and restated our credit
facility.
The $210.0 million revolving senior credit facility will
expire in July 2013. The revolving senior credit facility
includes a letter of credit
sub-facility
with a sublimit of $50.0 million.
Our revolving senior credit facility bears interest, at our
option, at either (1) LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin
of between 2.00% and 3.50% depending on the ratio of our total
funded indebtedness to our EBITDA from time to time (Total
Debt Ratio) or (2) the Base Rate (as defined below)
plus an applicable Base Rate Margin of between 0.50% and 2.00%
depending on our Total Debt Ratio. We may elect interest periods
of one, two, three or six months for LIBOR based borrowings. The
Base Rate is the greater of (i) the rate publicly announced
from time to time by Bank of America, N.A. as its prime
rate, or (ii) the overnight federal funds rate plus
0.50%.
Our senior credit facility includes a fixed charge ratio
covenant, a total debt to EBITDA ratio covenant, a limit on our
ability to incur additional indebtedness, issue preferred stock
or pay dividends, and certain other restrictions on our
activities. We are required to repay borrowings under our senior
credit facility out of the proceeds of future issuances of debt
or equity securities and asset sales, subject to certain
customary exceptions. Our senior credit facility is secured by
substantially all of our assets and all assets acquired in the
future (including a pledge of 100% of the stock of our existing
and future domestic guarantor subsidiaries and 65% of the stock
of our existing and future foreign subsidiaries).
We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants.
At December 31, 2009, we had $16.9 million of letters
of credit outstanding under the senior credit facility,
borrowings against the senior credit facility aggregated
$109.9 million and we had $15.8 million available
under the senior credit facility.
Interest
Rate Cap Transactions
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose
other than cash flow hedging purposes.
In 2006 we entered into an interest rate cap transaction with
Bank of America, which allowed us to limit our exposure on a
portion of our borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Under the rate cap transaction, we received payments from Bank
of America each quarterly period to the extent that the
prevailing three month LIBOR during that period exceeded our cap
rate of 5.75%. The rate cap transaction capped our LIBOR
interest rate on a notional amount of $50.0 million at
5.75% for a total of 36 months. The rate cap transaction
began as of August 4, 2006 and was settled each quarter on
a date that coincided with our quarterly interest payment dates
under our senior credit facility. This rate cap transaction was
classified as a cash flow hedge, and we calculated the
effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis. The ineffective
portion of the cash flow hedge was recognized in current period
earnings as an increase of interest expense.
Total changes in the fair value of the rate cap transaction for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 were immaterial.
The rate cap transaction expired on August 4, 2009.
Stock
Repurchases
In July 2008 our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase
shares of our common stock, on the open market or through
private purchases, up to $60.0 million in aggregate. As of
December 31, 2008, $22.9 million remained available
for repurchase under this authorization.
During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased
93,600 shares from third-party shareholders at an average
price of $18.23 per share, including average commissions of
$0.03 per share, on the open market. Our former majority
shareholder sold
37
119,701 shares to us in the first quarter of 2009 at an
average price of $18.20 per share. The total value of the first
quarter transactions was $3.9 million. We retired
200,650 shares during the first quarter of 2009 and retired
the remaining 12,651 shares in April 2009.
We did not make any share repurchases in the second, third, and
fourth quarters of 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, $19.0 million remained
available for repurchase under the July 2008 authorization by
the Board of Directors.
Letters
of Credit
At December 31, 2009, we have provided letters of credit
totaling $16.5 million to our casualty insurance carriers
to collateralize our casualty insurance program.
As of December 31, 2009, we provided $0.4 million in
letters of credit to collateralize other obligations.
Deficiency
Payments
Pursuant to our obligations with respect to the parking garage
operations at Bradley International Airport, we are required to
make certain payments for the benefit of the State of
Connecticut and for holders of special facility revenue bonds.
The deficiency payments represent contingent interest bearing
advances to the trustee to cover operating cash flow
requirements. The payments, if any, are recorded as a receivable
by us for which we are reimbursed from time to time as provided
in the trust agreement. As of December 31, 2009, we have a
receivable of $9.6 million, comprised of cumulative
deficiency payments to the trustee, net of reimbursements. We
believe these advances to be fully recoverable and therefore
have not recorded a valuation allowance for them. We do not
guarantee the payment of any principal or interest on any debt
obligations of the State of Connecticut or the trustee.
We made deficiency payments (net of repayments received) of
$3.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to deficiency payments (net of repayments received) of
$1.8 million made in the year ended December 31, 2008.
We did not receive deficiency repayments from the trustee for
interest or premium income in the year ended December 31,
2009 compared to $18 thousand received for premium income in the
year ended December 31, 2008 (See Note O to our
consolidated financial statements).
Capital
Leases
We incurred no new capital lease obligations for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Lease
Commitments
We have minimum lease commitments of $31.1 million for
fiscal 2010. The leased properties generate sufficient cash flow
to meet the base rent payment.
Daily
Cash Collections
As a result of
day-to-day
activity at our parking locations, we collect significant
amounts of cash. Lease contract revenue is generally deposited
into our local bank accounts, with a portion remitted to our
clients in the form of rental payments according to the terms of
the leases. Under management contracts, some clients require us
to deposit the daily receipts into one of our local bank
accounts, with the cash in excess of our operating expenses and
management fees remitted to the clients at negotiated intervals.
Other clients require us to deposit the daily receipts into
client accounts and the clients then reimburse us for operating
expenses and pay our management fee subsequent to month-end.
Some clients require a segregated account for the receipts and
disbursements at locations. Our working capital and liquidity
may be adversely affected if a significant number of our clients
require us to deposit all parking revenues into their respective
accounts.
Our liquidity also fluctuates on an intra-month and intra-year
basis depending on the contract mix and timing of significant
cash payments. Additionally, our ability to utilize cash
deposited into our local accounts is dependent upon the
availability and movement of that cash into our corporate
account. For all these reasons, from time to time, we carry a
significant cash balance, while also utilizing our senior credit
facility.
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Our primary sources of funds are cash flows from operating
activities and changes in working capital. Net cash provided by
operating activities totaled $21.8 million for 2009,
compared to $29.6 million for 2008. Cash provided during
2009 included $27.5 million from operations which was
offset by a net decrease in working capital of $5.7 million
The decrease in working capital resulted primarily from an
increase in notes and accounts receivable by $1.9 million
which primarily related to an
38
increase in business from new locations and our acquisitions, an
increase in other assets by $1.8 million which primarily
related to an increase in the cash surrender values related to
the
non-qualified
deferred compensation plan and deposits, an increase in prepaid
assets by $2.2 million which primarily related to increases
in prepaid insurance and prepaid taxes, an increase in accounts
payable by $2.0 million which primarily resulted from the
timing on payments to our clients and new business that are
under management contracts as described under Daily Cash
Collections, and a decrease in accrued liabilities by
$1.8 million which primarily related to a settlement of a
payout accrued for a prior year acquisition.
Our primary sources of funds are cash flows from operating
activities and changes in working capital. Net cash provided by
operating activities totaled $29.6 million for 2008,
compared to $36.7 million for 2007. Cash provided during
2008 included $34.4 million from operations which was
offset by a net decrease in working capital of
$4.8 million. The decrease in working capital resulted
primarily from an increase in notes and accounts receivable by
$4.8 million which primarily related to an increase in
business from new locations and our acquisitions, an increase in
other assets by $3.0 million which primarily related to
deposits made in conjunction with new business proposals that
are refundable and advances to clients for their facility
improvements that are reimbursed to us over a contractual term,
an increase in accounts payable by $3.5 million which
primarily resulted from the timing on payments to our clients
and new business that are under management contracts as
described under Daily Cash Collections, and a
decrease in accrued liabilities by $1.0 million which
primarily related to accrued rent that decreased due to
conversions to management contracts, new contract terms that
lowered the contingency rent amount for a higher fixed amount
and timing of payment obligations.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $7.1 million
in 2009 compared to $13.0 million in 2008. Cash used in
investing activities for 2009 included business acquisitions of
$2.5 million, capital expenditures of $3.5 million for
capital investments needed to secure
and/or
extend lease facilities, investment in information system
enhancements and infrastructure, cost of contract purchases of
$0.9 million and $0.3 million for contingent payments
on previously acquired contracts, which was partially offset by
$0.1 million of proceeds from the sale of assets.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $13.0 million
in 2008 compared to $10.7 million in 2007. Cash used in
investing activities for 2008 included business acquisitions of
$6.3 million, capital expenditures of $6.3 million for
capital investments needed to secure
and/or
extend lease facilities, investment in information system
enhancements and infrastructure, cost of contract purchases of
$0.6 million and $0.1 million for contingent payments
on previously acquired contracts, which was partially offset by
$0.3 million of proceeds from the sale of assets.
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $15.0 million
in 2009 compared to $16.2 million in 2008. Cash used in
financing activities for 2009 included $3.9 million used to
repurchase our common stock, $1.0 million used for payments
on capital leases, $10.8 million use for payments on senior
credit facility, $0.1 million used for payments on other
long-term borrowings, $.1 million distributed to
noncontrolling interest, offset by $0.4 million in proceeds
from the exercise of stock options and $0.5 million in
excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $16.2 million
in 2008 compared to $25.9 million in 2007. Cash used in
financing activities for 2008 included $60.0 million used
to repurchase our common stock, $2.3 million used for
payments of debt issuance costs, $1.6 million used for
payments on capital leases, $0.1 million used for payments
on other long-term borrowings $0.2 million on distributions
to noncontrolling interest, offset by $46.4 million in
proceeds from our senior credit facility, $0.7 million in
proceeds from the exercise of stock options and
$0.9 million in excess tax benefits related to stock option
exercises.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We had cash and cash equivalents of $8.3 million at
December 31, 2009, compared to $8.3 million at
December 31, 2008 and $8.5 million at
December 31, 2007. The cash balances reflect our ability to
utilize funds deposited into our local accounts and which based
upon availability, timing of deposits and the subsequent
movement of that cash into our corporate accounts may result in
significant changes to our cash balances.
39
Summary
Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments
The following summarizes certain of our contractual obligations
at December 31, 2009 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future
periods. The nature of our business is to manage parking
facilities. As a result, we do not have significant short-term
purchase obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
4 - 5 Years
|
|
|
After 5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
127,586
|
|
|
$
|
4,798
|
|
|
$
|
121,947
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
Operating leases(2)
|
|
|
109,343
|
|
|
|
31,073
|
|
|
|
55,057
|
|
|
|
12,135
|
|
|
|
11,078
|
|
Capital leases(3)
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities(4)
|
|
|
29,151
|
|
|
|
7,947
|
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
5,626
|
|
Letters of credit(5)
|
|
|
16,884
|
|
|
|
5,988
|
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(6)
|
|
$
|
285,176
|
|
|
$
|
50,380
|
|
|
$
|
201,039
|
|
|
$
|
16,213
|
|
|
$
|
17,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents principal amounts and interest. See Note F to
our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents minimum rental commitments, excluding contingent rent
provisions under all non-cancelable leases.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents principal amounts and interest on capital lease
obligations. See Note M to our consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Represents deferred compensation, customer deposits, insurance
claims, obligation related to acquisitions, sales tax on capital
leases and deferred partnership fees.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents amount of currently issued letters of credit at their
maturities.
|
|
(6)
|
|
$109.9 million in long-term debt and $16.9 million of
letters of credit are subject to a variable interest rate. The
interest rate used to estimate future interest payment subject
to variable debt included in our table is 3.21%, which
represents the weighted average interest rate on our variable
debt in effect as of December 31, 2009.
|
In addition we made contingent earnout payments of
$0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.1 million for
the years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We made
deficiency payments related to Bradley of $3.6 million,
$2.2 million and $0.7 million for the years ended
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No amounts have been included
on the above schedule related to those payments for future
periods as the amounts, if any, are not presently determinable.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations discusses our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Accounting estimates are an integral
part of the preparation of the financial statements and the
financial reporting process and are based upon current
judgments. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reported period. Certain accounting
estimates are particularly sensitive because of their complexity
and the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
materially from our current judgments and estimates.
This listing of critical accounting policies is not intended to
be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In
many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction
is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, with no need for
managements judgment regarding accounting policy. We
believe that of our significant accounting policies, the
following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity:
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill
As of December 31, 2009, our net long-lived assets were
comprised primarily of $17.2 million of property, equipment
and leasehold improvements and $12.9 million of contract
and lease rights. In accounting for our long-lived assets, other
than goodwill, we apply the provisions of the guidance related
to accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and
long lived assets to be disposed of. We account for
goodwill and other intangible assets under the provisions of the
guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets. As of
December 31, 2009, we had $126.9 million of goodwill.
The determination and measurement of an impairment loss under
these accounting standards require the significant use of
judgment and estimates. The determination of fair value of these
assets utilizes cash flow projections that assume certain future
revenue and cost levels, assumed discount rates based upon
current market conditions and other valuation factors, all of
which
40
involve the use of significant judgment and estimation. For the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 we were not required
to record any impairment charges related to long-lived assets or
to goodwill. Future events may indicate differences from our
judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in
impairment charges in the future. Future events that may result
in impairment charges include increases in interest rates, which
would impact discount rates, unfavorable economic conditions or
other factors which could decrease revenues and profitability of
existing locations and changes in the cost structure of existing
facilities. Factors that could potentially have an unfavorable
economic effect on our judgments and estimates include, among
others: changes imposed by governmental and regulatory agencies,
such as property condemnations and assessment of parking-related
taxes; construction or other events that could change traffic
patterns; and terrorism or other catastrophic events.
Insurance
Reserves
We purchase comprehensive casualty insurance (including, without
limitation, general liability, automobile liability,
garage-keepers legal liability, workers compensation and
umbrella/excess liability insurance) covering certain claims
that arise in connection with our operations. Under our various
liability and workers compensation insurance policies, we
are obligated to reimburse the insurance carrier for the first
$250,000 of any loss. As a result, we are, in effect,
self-insured for all claims up to the deductible levels. We
apply the provisions of the guidance related to accounting for
contingencies, in determining the timing and amount of expense
recognition associated with claims against us. The expense
recognition is based upon our determination of an unfavorable
outcome of a claim being deemed as probable and reasonably
estimated, as defined in the guidance related to accounting for
contingencies. This determination requires the use of judgment
in both the estimation of probability and the amount to be
recognized as an expense. We utilize historical claims
experience along with regular input from third party insurance
advisors and actuaries in determining the required level of
insurance reserves. Future information regarding historical loss
experience may require changes to the level of insurance
reserves and could result in increased expense recognition in
the future.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We report accounts receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts, to represent our estimate of the amount that
ultimately will be realized in cash. Management reviews the
adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts on an ongoing
basis, using historical collection trends, aging of receivables,
and a review of specific accounts, and makes adjustments in the
allowance as necessary. Changes in economic conditions or other
circumstances could have an impact on the collection of existing
receivable balances or future allowance considerations.
Income
Taxes
We use the asset and liability method to account for income
taxes, in accordance with the guidance related to accounting for
income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates to apply to taxable income in
the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. We have certain federal net operating
loss carry forwards which expire between 2022 and 2024. Our
ability to fully utilize these net operating losses to offset
taxable income is limited due to the change in ownership
resulting from the initial public offering (Internal Revenue
Code Section 382). We consider a number of factors in our
assessment of the recoverability of our net operating loss
carryforwards including their expiration dates, the limitations
imposed due to the change in ownership as well as future
projections of income. Future changes in our operating
performance along with these considerations may significantly
impact the amount of net operating losses ultimately recovered,
and our assessment of their recoverability.
Legal
and Other Contingencies
We are subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought
against us and other loss contingencies are subject to
significant uncertainty. We accrue a charge against income when
our management determines that it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we accrue for the
authoritative judgments or assertions made against us by
government agencies at the time of their rendering regardless of
our intent to appeal. In determining the appropriate accounting
for loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss or
impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. We
regularly evaluate current information available to us to
determine whether an accrual should be established or adjusted.
Estimating the probability that a loss will occur and estimating
the amount of a loss or a range of loss involves significant
judgment.
41
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Interest
Rates
Our primary market risk exposure consists of risk related to
changes in interest rates. We use a variable rate senior credit
facility to finance our operations. This facility exposes us to
variability in interest payments due to changes in interest
rates. If interest rates increase, interest expense increases
and conversely, if interest rates decrease, interest expense
also decreases. We believe that it is prudent to limit the
exposure of an increase in interest rates.
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose
other than cash flow hedging purposes.
In 2006 we entered into an interest rate cap transaction with
Bank of America, which allowed us to limit our exposure on a
portion of our borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Under the rate cap transaction, we received payments from Bank
of America each quarterly period to the extent that the
prevailing three month LIBOR during that period exceeded our cap
rate of 5.75%. The rate cap transaction capped our LIBOR
interest rate on a notional amount of $50.0 million at
5.75% for a total of 36 months. The rate cap transaction
began as of August 4, 2006 and was settled each quarter on
a date that coincided with our quarterly interest payment dates
under our senior credit facility. This rate cap transaction was
classified as a cash flow hedge, and we calculated the
effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis. The ineffective
portion of the cash flow hedge was recognized in current period
earnings as an increase of interest expense.
Total changes in the fair value of the rate cap transaction for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 were immaterial.
The rate cap transaction expired on August 4, 2009.
Our $210.0 million senior credit facility provides for a
$210.0 million variable rate revolving facility. In
addition, the credit facility includes a letter of credit
sub-facility
with a sublimit of $50.0 million and swing line
sub-facility
with a sublimit of $10.0 million. Interest expense on such
borrowing is sensitive to changes in the market rate of
interest. If we were to borrow the entire $220.0 million
available under the facility, a 1% increase in the average
market rate would result in an increase in our annual interest
expense of $2.20 million.
This amount is determined by considering the impact of the
hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost, but does not
consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic
activity that could exist in such an environment. Due to the
uncertainty of the specific changes and their possible effects,
the foregoing sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our
financial structure.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Our exposure to foreign exchange risk is minimal. All foreign
investments are denominated in U.S. dollars, with the
exception of Canada. We had approximately $0.9 million of
Canadian dollar denominated cash instruments at
December 31, 2009. We had no Canadian dollar denominated
debt instruments at December 31, 2009. We do not hold any
hedging instruments related to foreign currency transactions. We
monitor foreign currency positions and may enter into certain
hedging instruments in the future should we determine that
exposure to foreign exchange risk has increased.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The financial statements required by this Item are attached to
and are hereby incorporated into this report.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our
chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and corporate
controller carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). Based upon their evaluation, our chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, and corporate controller
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
adequate and effective and designed to ensure that material
information relating to us (including our consolidated
subsidiaries) required to be disclosed by us in the reports we
file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the required time periods.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting or any other factors that could
significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of
the evaluation referred to above.
42
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable
assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements. Under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including our chief executive officer, chief
financial officer and corporate controller, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee on
Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission (COSO
Framework). Based on our evaluation under the COSO
Framework, our management concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2009.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered certified
public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report,
which is included herein.
Limitations
of the Effectiveness of Internal Control
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of
the inherent limitations of any internal control system, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information required by this item with respect to our directors
and compliance by our directors, executive officers and certain
beneficial owners of our common stock with Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference to all information
under the captions entitled Board and Corporate Governance
Matters and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance from our Proxy Statement.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
The table below sets forth certain information as of
March 1, 2010 regarding our executive officers of the
Company, each of whom is elected by and serves at the pleasure
of the Board of Directors. The business experience shown for
each officer has been his principal occupation for at least the
past five years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
James A. Wilhelm
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
President; Chief Executive Officer; Director
|
G. Marc Baumann
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Financial Officer; Treasurer
|
Thomas L. Hagerman
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Operating Officer
|
Gerard M. Klaisle
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Human Resource Officer
|
John Ricchiuto
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations
|
Robert N. Sacks
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; General Counsel and Secretary
|
Edward E. Simmons
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations
|
Steven A. Warshauer
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations
|
Michael K. Wolf
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Administrative Officer;
Associate General Counsel
|
James A. Wilhelm
has served as our president since
September 2000 and as our chief executive officer and a director
since October 2001. Mr. Wilhelm served as our executive
vice president-operations from March 1998 to September 1999, and
he served as our senior executive vice president and chief
operations officer from September 1999 to August 2000.
Mr. Wilhelm joined the predecessors of Standard Parking
Corporation in 1985, serving as executive vice president
beginning in January 1998. Prior to March 1998, Mr. Wilhelm
was responsible for managing the Midwest and Western Regions,
which included parking facilities in Chicago and sixteen other
cities throughout the United States and Canada. Mr. Wilhelm
received his B.A. degree from Northeastern Illinois University
in 1976.
G. Marc Baumann
has served as our executive vice
president, chief financial officer and treasurer since October
2000. Prior to his appointment as our chief financial officer,
Mr. Baumann was chief financial officer for Warburtons Ltd.
in Bolton, England from January 1993 to October 2000.
Mr. Baumann is a certified public accountant and a member
of both the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and the Illinois CPA Society. He received his B.S. degree in
1977 from Northwestern University and his M.B.A. degree from the
Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in 1979.
43
Thomas L. Hagerman
has served as our executive vice
president and chief operating officer since October 2007. He
also served as our executive vice president of operations from
July 2004 through September 2007, and as a senior vice president
from March 1998 through June 2004. He received his B.A. degree
in marketing from The Ohio State University in 1984, and a B.A.
degree in business administration and finance from Almeda
University in 2004.
Gerard M. Klaisle
has served as our executive vice
president and chief human resource officer since February 2010.
He served as our senior vice president human
resources from April 2005 through January 2010. Prior to joining
our company, Mr. Klaisle was senior vice president of human
resources for USF Corporation, a trucking and logistics company,
from April 2001 through December 2004. Prior to joining
USF Corporation, Mr. Klaisle served 18 years with
Midas, Inc. where he rose from director of labor relations to
senior vice president, human resources. Mr. Klaisle earned
a B.S. degree from LeMoyne College in 1975 and his M.B.A. from
Loyola University in Chicago in 1979.
John Ricchiuto
has served as our executive vice president
of operations since December 2002. Mr. Ricchiuto joined
APCOA, Inc. in 1980 as a management trainee. He served as vice
president of Airport Properties Central from 1993 until 1994,
and as senior vice president of Airport Properties Central and
Eastern United States from 1994 until 2002. Mr. Ricchiuto
received his B.S. degree from Bowling Green University in 1979.
Robert N. Sacks
has served as our executive vice
president of general counsel and secretary since March 1998.
Mr. Sacks joined APCOA, Inc. in 1988, and served as general
counsel and secretary since 1988, as vice president, secretary,
and general counsel from 1989, and as senior vice president,
secretary and general counsel from 1997 to March 1998.
Mr. Sacks received his B.A. degree,
cum laude
, from
Northwestern University in 1976 and, in 1979, received his J.D.
degree from Suffolk University where he was a member of the
Suffolk University Law Review
.
Edward E. Simmons
has served as our executive vice
president of operations since August 1999 and as senior vice
president of operations from May 1998 to July 1999. Prior to
joining our Company, Mr. Simmons was president, chief
executive officer and co-founder of Executive Parking, Inc.
Mr. Simmons is currently a member of the National Parking
Association and the International Parking Institute.
Mr. Simmons is a past executive board member of the Parking
Association of California.
Steven A. Warshauer
has served as our executive vice
president of operations since March 1998. Mr. Warshauer
joined the Standard Companies in 1982, initially serving as vice
president, then becoming senior vice president.
Mr. Warshauer received his B.S. Degree from the University
of Northern Colorado in 1976 with a major in Accounting.
Michael K. Wolf
has served as our executive vice
president, chief administrative officer and associate general
counsel since March 1998. Mr. Wolf served as senior vice
president and general counsel of Standard Parking from 1990 to
January 1998. Mr. Wolf received his B.A. degree in 1971
from the University of Pennsylvania and in 1974 received his
J.D. degree from Washington University, where he served as an
editor of the
Washington University Law Quarterly
and was
elected to the Order of the Coif.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption entitled
Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
Compensation Committee Report, Executive
Compensation, and Director Compensation,
included in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption entitled
Security Ownership-Beneficial Ownership of Directors and
Executive Officers and Security Ownership-Beneficial
Ownership of More Than Five Percent of Common Stock
included in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption
Transactions with Related Persons and Control
Persons and Board and Corporate Governance
Matters included in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption Audit
Committee Disclosure included in our Proxy Statement.
44
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
All other schedules are omitted since the required information
is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to
require submission of the schedule, or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the notes thereto.
45
Exhibit Listing
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company filed on June 2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
3.1.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of
January 7, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
3.2
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated
January 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 27, 2010).
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 18, 2004).
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 15, 2008
among the Company, various financial institutions, Bank of
America, N.A., and Wells Fargo, N.A. (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
field on July 18, 2008).
|
10.2
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
betweeen the Company and Wells Fargo (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010).
|
10.3
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
between the Company and Fifth Third (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010.
|
10.4
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated May 15, 2006 by and among the
Company, D&E Parking, Inc. and Dale G. Stark (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 17, 2006).
|
10.5+
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 30, 1998 between the
Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.6 of the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-4,
File
No. 333-50437,
filed on April 17, 1998).
|
10.5.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 7, 2003
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.1 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
10.5.2+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.2 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
10.6+
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 26, 1998 between the
Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.12 of the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-4,
File
No. 333-50437,
filed on April 17, 1998).
|
10.6.1+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of June 19, 2000
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.1 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.6.2+
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
December 6, 2000, between the Company and Michael K. Wolf,
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2000).
|
10.6.3+
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2002
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.19.3 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.6.4+
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 31,
2003 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.4 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.6.5+
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 18,
2008 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.5 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.6.6+
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 28,
2009 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
10.7+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
January 28, 2009 between Company and James A. Wilhelm
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of the
Companys Current Report of
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
10.8+
|
|
Employment Agreement dated May 18, 1998 between the Company
and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.24 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
46
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.8.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
November 7, 2001 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.25 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
10.8.2+
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
August 1, 2003 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.2 of the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.8.3+
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
April 1, 2005 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.3 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.8.4+
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
December 29, 2008 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.4 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.8.5+
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
January 28, 2009 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.5 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.9+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
December 1, 2002 between the Company and John Ricchiuto
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22.2 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.9.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated as of April 11, 2005, between the Company
and John Ricchiuto (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
10.10+
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 1,
2005, between the Company and Steven A. Warshauer (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
10.11+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
May 18, 2006 between the Company and Edward E. Simmons
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 24, 2006).
|
10.12+
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company
and G. Marc Baumann dated as of October 1, 2001
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.27 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
10.12.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of
December 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.11.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.12.2+
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of
January 28, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
10.13+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2005, between the Company and Thomas L. Hagerman
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
10.13.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated October 1, 2007 between the Company and
Thomas Hagerman (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed for September 30, 2007).
|
10.14*+
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 15, 2005 between
the Company and Gerard M. Klaisle.
|
10.14.1*+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated December 29, 2008 between the Company and
Gerard M. Klaisle.
|
10.15+
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan dated as of May 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 of Amendment
No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 10, 2004).
|
10.15.1+
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan Amendment effective as of
April 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Appendix B of the Companys 2008 Proxy on
Form DEF 14A, filed on April 1, 2008).
|
10.16+
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Stock Option Award Agreement
between the Company and an optionee (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 21, 2005).
|
10.16.1+
|
|
Form of First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Stock Option
Award Agreement between the Company and an optionee
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 21, 2005).
|
47
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.17
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated as of October 16, 2001 between
the Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.36 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
10.17.1
|
|
Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.14.1 of the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
10.18
|
|
Executive Parking Management Agreement dated as of May 1,
1998 by and among the Company, D&E Parking, Edward E.
Simmons and Dale G. Stark (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.32 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.18.1
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Parking Management Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1999 by and among the Company, D&E
Parking, Edward E. Simmons and Dale G. Stark (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.32.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.19
|
|
Consulting Agreement effective as of May 1, 2007 by and
among the Company, D&E Parking, Inc. and Dale G. Stark
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for December 31, 2007).
|
10.20
|
|
Property Management Agreement dated as of September 1, 2003
between the Company and Paxton Plaza, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.19 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.21
|
|
Property Management Agreement dated as of September 1, 2003
between the Company and Infinity Equities, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.20 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22
|
|
Agreement of Lease dated as of June 4, 1998 between the
Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to LaSalle
National Bank. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21
of the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22.1
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of May 1,
1999 between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.21.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22.2
|
|
Second Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of July 27,
2000 between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.21.2 of the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22.3
|
|
Third Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of
September 11, 2003 between the Company and LaSalle National
Bank, as successor trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as
successor trustee to LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.21.3 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.23+
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated as of March 1, 2004 between the
Company and Gunnar E. Klintberg (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.24 of Amendment No. 1 to the Companys
Registration
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 10, 2004).
|
10.23.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated March 15,
2006 between the Company and Gunnar E. Klintberg (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.24.1 of the Companys
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 16, 2006).
|
10.24
|
|
Form of Property Management Agreement (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.30 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 10, 2006).
|
10.25
|
|
Form of Standard Parking Corporation Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement dated as of July 1, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 2, 2008).
|
10.25.1
|
|
First Amendment to Form of Standard Parking Corporation
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
as filed on August 6, 2009).
|
10.26
|
|
Guaranty Agreement of APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc. dated as of
March 2000 to and for the benefit of the State of Connecticut,
Department of Transportation (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.27 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.27
|
|
Construction, Financing and Operating Special Facility Lease
Agreement dated as of March 2000 between the State of
Connecticut Department of Transportation and APCOA Bradley
Parking Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.28 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
48
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.28
|
|
Trust Indenture dated March 1, 2000 between State of
Connecticut and First Union National Bank as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.29 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.29
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated June 2, 2004 between
the Company and Steamboat, as amended to Join additional
financial institutions as parties on May 15, 2009
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
as filed on May 18, 2009).
|
10.29.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as
of November 9, 2009, by and among the Company, and GSO
Special Situations Fund LP, GSO Special Situations Overseas
Master Fund Ltd., GSO Special Situations Overseas Benefit
Plan Fund Ltd., GSO Capital Opportunities Fund LP, and
CML VII, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of
the Companys Current Report of
Form 8-K
filed on November 12, 2009).
|
10.30*
|
|
Restrictive Covenants and Release Agreement effective as of
August 31, 2009 between the Company and A. Petter
Østberg.
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to exhibit 14.1
of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for December 31, 2002).
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
23*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated
as of March 12, 2010.
|
31.1*
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 12, 2010 for
James A. Wilhelm, Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer).
|
31.2*
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 12, 2010 for G.
Marc Baumann, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer).
|
31.3*
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 12, 2010 for
Daniel R. Meyer, Senior Vice President Corporate Controller and
Assistant Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer and Duly
Authorized Officer).
|
32*
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, dated March 12, 2010.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
+
|
|
Management contract or compensation plan, contract or
arrangement.
|
49
INDEX TO
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
50
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Standard Parking
Corporation
We have audited Standard Parking Corporations internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Standard Parking Corporations management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying
Form 10-K.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Standard Parking Corporation maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheets of Standard Parking Corporation
as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, and our report dated March 12, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 12, 2010
51
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Standard Parking
Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Standard Parking Corporation (Company) as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Standard Parking Corporation at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
As described in Note A to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2009 the Company adopted
ASC
810-10-45,
Consolidation Other Presentation Matters
relating to the presentation and accounting for noncontrolling
interest.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Standard Parking Corporations internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 12, 2010,
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 12, 2010
52
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8,256
|
|
|
$
|
8,301
|
|
Notes and accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
44,490
|
|
|
|
45,198
|
|
Prepaid expenses and supplies
|
|
|
5,401
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
61,604
|
|
|
|
59,248
|
|
Leasehold improvements, equipment and construction in progress,
net
|
|
|
17,175
|
|
|
|
17,542
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances and deposits
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
Long-term receivables, net
|
|
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
6,680
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
6,765
|
|
|
|
6,916
|
|
Cost of contracts, net
|
|
|
12,879
|
|
|
|
10,872
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
126,853
|
|
|
|
123,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,726
|
|
|
|
152,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
240,505
|
|
|
$
|
229,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
48,502
|
|
|
$
|
46,446
|
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
3,905
|
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
Compensation and payroll withholdings
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
9,331
|
|
Property, payroll and other taxes
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
Accrued insurance
|
|
|
7,185
|
|
|
|
6,840
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
13,318
|
|
|
|
8,075
|
|
Current portion of obligations under senior credit facility and
other
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
82,320
|
|
|
|
78,930
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
Long-term borrowings, excluding current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under senior credit facility
|
|
|
109,850
|
|
|
|
120,600
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,549
|
|
|
|
123,996
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
22,808
|
|
|
|
22,052
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 21,300,000 shares
authorized; 15,385,428 and 16,110,781 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
91,793
|
|
|
|
103,541
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 627,423 shares as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,161
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(77,372
|
)
|
|
|
(91,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Standard Parking Corporation Stockholders equity
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
14,677
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
240,505
|
|
|
$
|
229,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
53
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Parking services revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
140,441
|
|
|
$
|
154,311
|
|
|
$
|
145,327
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
153,382
|
|
|
|
145,828
|
|
|
|
119,612
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
356,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
695,494
|
|
|
|
700,760
|
|
|
|
621,721
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
130,897
|
|
|
|
140,058
|
|
|
|
129,550
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
84,167
|
|
|
|
69,285
|
|
|
|
49,726
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
356,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services
|
|
|
616,735
|
|
|
|
609,964
|
|
|
|
536,058
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
14,253
|
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
69,215
|
|
|
|
76,543
|
|
|
|
69,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
78,759
|
|
|
|
90,796
|
|
|
|
85,663
|
|
General and administrative expenses(1)
|
|
|
44,707
|
|
|
|
47,619
|
|
|
|
44,796
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,828
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
667,270
|
|
|
|
663,642
|
|
|
|
586,189
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28,224
|
|
|
|
37,118
|
|
|
|
35,532
|
|
Other expenses (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
22,480
|
|
|
|
30,815
|
|
|
|
29,086
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
17,819
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
$
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
15,292,412
|
|
|
|
17,325,235
|
|
|
|
18,831,667
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
15,683,525
|
|
|
|
17,731,473
|
|
|
|
19,289,076
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Non-cash stock based compensation expense of $2,292, $1,509 and
$463 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, is included in general and administrative expenses.
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
54
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock(1)
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
19,243,598
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
169,624
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
32,200
|
|
|
$
|
(647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,220
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
17,819
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Revaluation of interest rate cap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,162
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(1,130,642
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(21,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,200
|
)
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,947
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,474
|
|
|
|
(1,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,172
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
228,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
25,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under the long-term incentive plan
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Stock-based compensation related to restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
18,371,308
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
150,520
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
|
48,474
|
|
|
$
|
(1,172
|
)
|
|
$
|
(110,509
|
)
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
39,358
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
Revaluation of interest rate cap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(2,429,993
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(50,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,474
|
)
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,863
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627,423
|
|
|
|
(11,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,161
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
152,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Issuance of stock grants
|
|
|
17,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Stock-based compensation related to long-term incentive plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation related to restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
16,110,781
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
103,541
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
627,423
|
|
|
$
|
(11,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
(91,464
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
958
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,092
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,443
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(843,540
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(15,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(627,423
|
)
|
|
|
11,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,885
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
105,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
Issuance of stock grants
|
|
|
12,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Stock-based compensation related to long-term incentive plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation related to restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolliing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
15,385,428
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
91,793
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(77,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
19,193
|
|
|
$
|
17,819
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,460
|
|
|
|
5,475
|
|
|
|
5,187
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
Write off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
Excess tax benefit related to stock option exercises
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
7,644
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,860
|
)
|
|
|
(4,831
|
)
|
|
|
(3,106
|
)
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
|
(2,244
|
)
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
|
|
(3,020
|
)
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
3,505
|
|
|
|
9,389
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,787
|
)
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
21,761
|
|
|
|
29,555
|
|
|
|
36,667
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
|
|
(3,486
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
(4,517
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
(6,318
|
)
|
|
|
(6,202
|
)
|
Cost of contracts purchased
|
|
|
(934
|
)
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent purchase payments
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,080
|
)
|
|
|
(12,987
|
)
|
|
|
(10,656
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(3,885
|
)
|
|
|
(60,024
|
)
|
|
|
(22,119
|
)
|
(Payments on) proceeds from senior credit facility
|
|
|
(10,750
|
)
|
|
|
46,450
|
|
|
|
(2,900
|
)
|
Payments on long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
Payments of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(2,352
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
Tax benefit related to stock option exercise
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(14,954
|
)
|
|
|
(16,241
|
)
|
|
|
(25,875
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
408
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
8,301
|
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,256
|
|
|
$
|
8,301
|
|
|
$
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
5,951
|
|
|
$
|
8,686
|
|
|
$
|
7,240
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
56
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(In thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
Note A.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Standard Parking Corporation (which may be referred to as
Standard, the Company, we,
us or our), and its subsidiaries and
affiliates is a leading national provider of parking facility
management, ground transportation and other ancillary services.
The Company, with approximately 12,000 employees, manages
approximately 2,100 facilities, containing over one million
parking spaces in approximately 335 cities across the
United States and four Canadian provinces, including
parking-related and shuttle bus operations serving 63 airports.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and joint ventures
in which the Company has more than 50% ownership interest.
Noncontrolling interest recorded in the consolidated statements
of income is the joint venture partners noncontrolling
interest in consolidated joint ventures. We have interests in
twelve joint ventures, each of which operates between one and
thirty two parking facilities. Of the twelve joint ventures,
eight are majority owned by us and are consolidated into our
financial statements, and four are single purpose entities where
we have a 50% interest or a noncontrolling interest. Investments
in joint ventures where the Company has a 50% or less
noncontrolling ownership interest are accounted for under the
equity method. All significant intercompany profits,
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Variable
Interest Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commencement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Operations
|
|
Nature of Activities
|
|
% Ownership
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
Other Investments in VIEs
|
|
Jan 03 July 08
|
|
Management of parking lots, shuttle operations and parking meters
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
Various states
|
The existing four VIEs in which we have a variable interest are
not consolidated into our financial statements because we are
not the primary beneficiary.
Parking
Revenue
The Companys revenues are primarily derived from leased
locations, managed properties and the providing of ancillary
services, such as accounting, equipment leasing, payments
received for exercising termination rights, consulting
development fees, gains on sales of contracts, insurance and
other value-added services. In accordance with the guidance
related to revenue recognition, revenue is recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are fixed
or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and as
services are provided. The Company recognizes gross receipts
(net of taxes collected from customers) as revenue from leased
locations, and management fees for parking services, as the
related services are provided. Ancillary services are earned
from management contract properties and are recorded as revenue
as those services are provided. From time to time, the Company
also recognizes gains on sales of parking contracts and
development fees which are recorded as management contract
revenue as those services are provided
and/or
earned ($0 in 2009 and $0 in 2008 and $622 in 2007). Development
fees are revenue received from a customer for which we have
provided certain consulting services as part of our offerings of
ancillary management services. The gains from sales of contracts
are for these contracts for which we have no asset basis or
ownership interest and would be received as part of a formula
buy-out in the contract in order for the owner to terminate the
contract prior to its expiration.
Cost
of Parking Services
The Company recognizes costs for leases and non-reimbursed costs
from managed facilities as cost of parking services. Cost of
parking services consists primarily of rent and payroll related
costs.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in
general and administrative expenses. Advertising expenses
aggregated $212, $195 and $191 for 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
57
Stock-Based
Compensation
We measure stock-based compensation expense at the grant date,
based on the fair value of the award, and the expense is
recognized over the requisite employee service period (generally
the vesting period) for awards expected to vest (considering
estimated forfeitures).
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents represent funds temporarily invested in money
market instruments with maturities of one to five days. Cash
equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts,
represents our estimate of the amount that ultimately will be
realized in cash. Management reviews the adequacy of its
allowance for doubtful accounts on an ongoing basis, using
historical collection trends, aging of receivables, and a review
of specific accounts, and makes adjustments in the allowance as
necessary. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances
could have an impact on the collection of existing receivable
balances or future allowance considerations. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Companys allowance
for doubtful accounts was $3,002 and $3,866, respectively.
Leasehold
Improvements, Equipment, and Construction in Progress,
net
Leasehold improvements and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment is
depreciated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of approximately 5 years on average. Leasehold
improvements are amortized on the straight-line basis over the
terms of the respective leases or the service lives of the
improvements, whichever is shorter (average of approximately
7 years). Assets under capital leases are amortized on the
straight-line basis over the shorter of the terms of the
respective leases or the service lives of the asset and is
included in depreciation expense.
Costs associated with internal-use software are accounted for in
accordance with guidance related to accounting for the costs of
computer software developed or obtained for internal use.
Cost
of Contracts
Cost of parking contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis
over the weighted average contract life which is 10 years
for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008 and
7 years for the year ending December 31, 2007.
Amortization expense was $1,762, $1,344 and $1,087 in 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Goodwill
We test goodwill for impairment annually and more frequently if
circumstances warrant. We determine fair values for each of the
reporting units using an income approach. For purposes of the
income approach, fair value is determined based on the present
value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at an
appropriate risk-adjusted rate. We use our internal forecasts to
estimate future cash flows and include an estimate of long-term
future growth rates based on our most recent views of the
long-term outlook for each segment. These assumptions could be
adversely impacted by certain of the risks discussed in
Risk Factors in Item 1A. Actual results may
differ from those assumed in our forecasts. We use discount
rates that are commensurate with the risks and uncertainty
inherent in the respective reporting units and in our internally
developed forecasts.
We performed our annual impairment test for goodwill at all of
our reporting units in the fourth quarter.. In performing the
valuations, we used cash flows, which reflected
managements forecasts and discount rates which reflect the
risks associated with the current market. Based on the results
of our testing, the fair values of each of our reporting units
exceeded their book values; therefore, the second step of the
impairment test (in which fair value of each of the reporting
units assets and liabilities is measured) was not required
to be performed and no goodwill impairment was recognized.
Estimating the fair value of reporting units involves the use of
estimates and significant judgments that are based on a number
of factors including actual operating results. If current
conditions change from those expected, it is reasonably possible
that the judgments and estimates described above could change in
future periods.
Long
Lived and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles with finite lives
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used
is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset
or group of assets to future undiscounted net cash flows
58
expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets. If
such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Debt
Issuance Costs
The costs of obtaining financing are capitalized and amortized
as interest expense over the term of the respective financing
using the interest rate method. Debt issuance costs of $2,165
and $2,776 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are
included in intangibles and other assets in the consolidated
balance sheets and are reflected net of accumulated
amortization. Amortization expense was $640, $449 and $275 at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Financial
Instruments
The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable and accounts
payable are reasonable estimates of their fair value due to the
short-term nature of these financial instruments. Long-term debt
has a carrying value that approximates fair value because these
instruments bear interest at market rates.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The functional currency of the Companys foreign operations
is the local currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of
the Companys foreign operations are translated from
foreign currencies into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect
on the balance sheet date while income and expenses are
translated at the weighted-average exchange rates for the year.
Adjustments resulting from the translations of foreign currency
financial statements are accumulated and classified as a
separate component of stockholders equity.
Interest
Rate Caps
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose
other than cash flow hedging purposes.
In 2006 we entered into an interest rate cap transaction with
Bank of America, which allowed us to limit our exposure on a
portion of our borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Under the rate cap transaction, we received payments from Bank
of America each quarterly period to the extent that the
prevailing three month LIBOR during that period exceeded our cap
rate of 5.75%. The rate cap transaction capped our LIBOR
interest rate on a notional amount of $50.0 million at
5.75% for a total of 36 months. The rate cap transaction
began as of August 4, 2006 and was settled each quarter on
a date that coincided with our quarterly interest payment dates
under our senior credit facility. This rate cap transaction was
classified as a cash flow hedge, and we calculated the
effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis. The ineffective
portion of the cash flow hedge was recognized in current period
earnings as an increase of interest expense.
Total changes in the fair value of the rate cap transaction for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 were immaterial.
The rate cap transaction expired on August 4, 2009.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Insurance
Reserves
The Company purchases comprehensive liability insurance covering
certain claims that arise in connection with our operations. In
addition, the Company purchases umbrella/excess liability
coverage. The Companys various liability insurance
policies have deductibles of up to $250 that must be met before
the insurance companies are required to reimburse the Company
for costs incurred relating to covered claims. As a result, the
Company is, in effect, self-insured for all claims up to the
deductible levels. The Company applies the provisions as defined
in the guidance related to accounting for contingencies, in
determining the timing and amount of expense recognition
associated with claims against the Company. The expense
recognition is based upon the Companys determination of an
unfavorable outcome of a claim being deemed as probable and
capable of being reasonably estimated, as defined in the
guidance related to accounting for contingencies. This
determination requires the use of judgment in both the
estimation of probability and the amount to be recognized as an
expense. The Company utilizes historical claims experience along
with regular input from third party insurance advisors in
determining the required level of insurance reserves. Future
information regarding historical loss experience may require
changes to the level of insurance reserves and could result in
increased expense recognition in the future.
59
Contingencies
The Company is subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The Company applies the provisions as defined in the
guidance related to accounting for contingencies in determining
the recognition and measurement of expense recognition
associated with legal claims against the Company. Management
uses guidance from internal and external legal counsel on the
potential outcome of litigation in determining the need to
record liabilities for potential losses and the disclosure of
pending legal claims.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting
Standards Not Yet Adopted
In January 2010, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which
updates some new disclosures and clarifies some existing
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. The
majority of the provisions of this update are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard will not
have a material impact on our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance regarding the
consolidation of variable interest entities that is intended to
improve financial reporting by providing additional guidance to
companies involved with variable interest entities and by
requiring additional disclosures about a companys
involvement in variable interest entities. This standard is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact,
if any, the adoption will have on our future results of
operations and financial condition.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued updated accounting guidance that
amends and eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity, creates more stringent conditions for
reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a
sale, clarifies other sale-accounting criteria and changes the
initial measurement of a transferors interest in
transferred financial assets. We are required to adopt the
updated accounting guidance at the beginning of 2010. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption will have
on our future results of operations and financial condition.
In October 2009, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance
that amends the guidance related to revenue
recognition-multiple-element arrangements. The standards enable
Companies to account for certain products and services
(deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. This
accounting guidance provides amendments to the criteria for
separating deliverables, measuring and allocating arrangement
consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments
also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the
selling price of a deliverable. Significantly enhanced
disclosures are also required to provide information about a
vendors multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements,
including information about the nature and terms, significant
deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The
amendments also require providing information about the
significant judgments made and changes to those judgments and
about how the application of the relative selling-price method
affects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The
amendments are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. A company may adopt
the new standard retroactively and early application is
permitted. We are currently evaluating how we will adopt this
new guidance and the impact, if any, the adoption will have on
our future results of operations and financial condition.
Accounting
Standards Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (the Codification), which became the
single source of authoritative nongovernmental
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), superseding existing FASB, American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA),
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), and related
accounting literature. The Codification reorganized the
thousands of GAAP pronouncements into roughly 90 accounting
topics and displays them using a consistent structure. Also
included is relevant Securities and Exchange Commission guidance
organized using the same topical structure in separate sections.
The codification is effective for financial statements issued
for reporting periods that end after September 15, 2009.
All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not
included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. We
adopted the Codification effective September 30, 2009. As
the Codification did not change or alter existing GAAP, the
adoption of the Codification did not impact our results of
operations or financial condition.
In April 2009, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance on
determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for
an asset or liability has significantly decreased and
identifying transactions that are not orderly. If after
evaluating those factors, the evidence indicates there has been
a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in
relation to normal market activity, observed transactional
values or quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value
and adjustment to the observed transactional values or quoted
prices may be necessary to estimate fair value. The updated
accounting guidance also prospectively expands and increases the
frequency of existing disclosures related primarily to
additional security types and valuation methodologies. The
Companys adoption of this updated accounting guidance did
not impact the financial condition or
60
results of operations of the Company. The FASB issued updated
accounting guidance on how to assess whether an asset has
experienced an
other-than-temporary
impairment and, if so, where the impairment should be recorded
in the financial statements. The Companys adoption of this
updated accounting guidance did not impact the financial
condition or results of operations of the Company.
In September 2006, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The updated
accounting guidance does not require new fair value
measurements, but is applied to the extent that other accounting
guidance requires or permit fair value measurements. The updated
accounting guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based
measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability. Companies are required to disclose the extent to
which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities, the
inputs used to develop the measurements, and the effect of
certain of the measurements on earnings (or changes in net
assets) for the period. On January 1, 2008, the Company
adopted the updated accounting guidance related to financial
assets and liabilities, as well as other liabilities carried at
fair value on a recurring basis. These provisions did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the
updated accounting guidance related to nonfinancial assets and
liabilities. The adoption of this updated accounting guidance
did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted the updated accounting
guidance which established principles and requirements on how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed,
noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, goodwill or gain from
a bargain purchase and transaction costs. Additionally, the
updated accounting guidance determined what information must be
disclosed to enable users of the financial statements to
evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. The adoption of this updated accounting guidance is
reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted the updated accounting
guidance for business combinations and reporting noncontrolling
interests. Companies are required to report noncontrolling
(formerly, minority) interests as a component of
shareholders equity on the balance sheet; include all
earnings of a consolidated subsidiary in consolidated results of
operations; and treat all transactions between the parent and
its noncontrolling interest holder that increase or decrease the
noncontrolling interest as equity provided the parent does not
lose control. The adoption of the updated accounting guidance on
noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial Statements is
reflected in the companys consolidated financial
statements on a retrospective basis and such adoption did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Reclassification
Certain amounts previously presented in the financial statements
of prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current
year presentation.
|
|
Note B.
|
Net
Income Per Common Share
|
Companies are required to present basic and diluted earnings per
share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is
based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding for the period plus dilutive potential common
shares, including stock options and restricted stock units using
the treasury-stock method.
A reconciliation of the weighted average basic shares
outstanding to the weighted average diluted shares outstanding
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
$
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
15,292,412
|
|
|
|
17,325,235
|
|
|
|
18,831,667
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
391,113
|
|
|
|
406,238
|
|
|
|
457,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
15,683,525
|
|
|
|
17,731,473
|
|
|
|
19,289,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
61
There were 19,068 anti-dilutive options excluded in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2009 because the options exercise prices
were greater than the average market price of the common stock.
There were no anti-dilutive options for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, 9,205 and
18,777 shares, respectively, of performance based
restricted stock were not included in the computation of
weighted average diluted common share amounts because the number
of shares ultimately issuable is contingent on the
Companys performance goals, which were not achieved as of
that date. There were no performance based restricted stock
awards issued and outstanding in 2006.
There are no additional securities that could dilute basic EPS
in the future that were not included in the computation of
diluted EPS, other than those disclosed.
|
|
Note C.
|
Leasehold
Improvements, Equipment and Construction in Progress,
net
|
A summary of leasehold improvements, equipment, and construction
in progress and related accumulated depreciation and
amortization is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
Ranges of Estimated Useful Life
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
2 - 10 years
|
|
$
|
28,568
|
|
|
$
|
29,615
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Shorter of lease term or
economic life up to 10 years
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
10,340
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
6,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,819
|
|
|
|
46,472
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
(28,644
|
)
|
|
|
(28,930
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements, equipment and construction in progress,
net
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,175
|
|
|
$
|
17,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $3,832, $4,403 and $4,200 in 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Depreciation includes losses on
abandonments of leasehold improvements and equipment of $369,
$584 and $148 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
Note D.
|
Cost of
Contracts, net
|
Cost of contracts represents the contractual rights associated
with providing parking services at a managed or leased facility.
Cost consists of either capitalized payments made to third
parties or the value ascribed to contracts acquired through
acquisition. Cost of contracts are amortized over the estimated
life of the contracts, including anticipated renewals and
terminations.
The balance of cost of contracts is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of contracts
|
|
$
|
18,885
|
|
|
$
|
15,303
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(6,006
|
)
|
|
|
(4,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of contracts, net
|
|
$
|
12,879
|
|
|
$
|
10,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected future amortization of cost of contracts is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Contract
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,926
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
2015 and Thereafter
|
|
|
4,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to cost of contracts was $1,762,
$1,344 and $1,087 for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The weighted average useful life is
9 years for 2009 and 10 years for 2008.
62
2009
Acquisitions
On July 1, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of
the assets of Gameday Management Group U.S. Gameday
Management, based in Orlando, Florida, which plans and operates
transportation and parking systems for major stadiums and
sporting events in the amount of $5,341, of which $2,450 was
paid in cash, net of a hold back of $50, and $2,891 of potential
earn-out payments. Among the assets acquired is Gamedays
Click and Park online parking and traffic management system,
which enables customers to purchase reserved parking online in
advance of an event. The acquisition represents an acquisition
of a business and was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. This acquisition is not considered material to the
Company.
The purchase price allocations are based on preliminary
estimates of intangibles with finite lives of $2,841 and
goodwill of $2,500. These estimates are subject to revision
after the Company completes its fair value analysis. The Company
financed the acquisition through additional term borrowings
under the senior credit facility and existing cash. The results
of operations of this acquisition are included in the
Companys consolidated statement of income from the date of
acquisition.
The Company expensed acquisition related costs of $178 in 2009
and $246 in 2008. These costs are included in General and
Administrative expenses in the income statement.
2008
Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
completed two acquisitions. Consideration for all acquisitions
was $8,505 of which $6,008 was paid in cash and $2,497 in a
discounted non-interest bearing note to be paid in annual
installments of $600, commencing February 2009 and an estimated
$187 to be paid in the future based upon financial performance
compared to forecast. On March 31, 2009, we entered into a
settlement agreement with the principals of G.O. Parking which
amended the agreement, provided for a termination fee and a
reimbursement of legal fees we incurred for post acquisition
disputes. On April 14th we paid G.O. parking $1,680 in lieu of
the original obligation. In addition, the Company paid and
capitalized $310 in acquisition costs. A summary of the
acquisitions follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2008, we acquired certain assets of Downtown Valet,
LLC, a valet parking operator in Seattle, Washington.
|
|
|
|
In February 2008, we acquired certain assets of G.O. Parking, a
parking operator in Chicago, Illinois.
|
The acquisitions of Downtown Valet, LLC and G.O. Parking
represent acquisitions of businesses.
These acquisitions consisted of goodwill of $3,007, cost of
contract of $5,314, intangible assets of $233 and equipment of
$261.
The acquisitions for 2008 were accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. The Company financed the acquisitions
through additional term borrowings under the senior credit
facility and existing cash. The results of operations of these
acquisitions are included in the Companys consolidated
statement of income from the date of acquisition. None of the
acquisitions, either individually or in the aggregate, is
considered material to the Company.
|
|
Note F.
|
Borrowing
Arrangements
|
Long-term borrowings, in order of preference, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Due Date
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
June 2013
|
|
$
|
109,850
|
|
|
$
|
120,600
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
Various
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
Obligations on Seller notes and other
|
|
Various
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,211
|
|
|
|
125,064
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,549
|
|
|
$
|
123,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Credit Facility
On July 15, 2008, we amended and restated our credit
facility.
63
The $210,000 revolving senior credit facility will expire in
July 2013. The revolving senior credit facility includes a
letter of credit
sub-facility
with a sublimit of $50,000.
This revolving senior credit facility bears interest, at our
option, at either (1) LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin
of between 2.00% and 3.50% depending on the ratio of our total
funded indebtedness to our EBITDA from time to time (Total
Debt Ratio) or (2) the Base Rate (as defined below)
plus an applicable Base Rate Margin of between 0.50% and 2.00%
depending on our Total Debt Ratio. We may elect interest periods
of one, two, three or six months for LIBOR based borrowings. The
Base Rate is the greater of (i) the rate publicly announced
from time to time by Bank of America, N.A. as its prime
rate, or (ii) the overnight federal funds rate plus
0.50%.
Our senior credit facility includes a fixed charge ratio
covenant, a total debt to EBITDA ratio covenant, a limit on our
ability to incur additional indebtedness, issue preferred stock
or pay dividends, and certain other restrictions on our
activities. We are required to repay borrowings under our senior
credit facility out of the proceeds of future issuances of debt
or equity securities and asset sales, subject to certain
customary exceptions. Our senior credit facility is secured by
substantially all of our assets and all assets acquired in the
future (including a pledge of 100% of the stock of our existing
and future domestic guarantor subsidiaries and 65% of the stock
of our existing and future foreign subsidiaries).
We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants as of
December 31, 2009.
The weighted average interest rate on our senior credit facility
at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was 3.2% and 3.6%,
respectively. The rate includes all outstanding LIBOR contracts,
interest rate cap effect and letters of credit. The weighted
average interest rate on outstanding borrowings, not including
letters of credit, was 3.3% and 3.8% at December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively.
At December 31, 2009, we had $16,884 of letters of credit
outstanding under the senior credit facility, borrowings against
the senior credit facility aggregated $109,850, and we had
$15,805 available under the senior credit facility.
We have entered into various financing agreements, which were
used for the purchase of equipment (see Note J).
|
|
Note G.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$
|
2,778
|
|
|
$
|
2,797
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
State
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
3,894
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
Deferred provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
7,728
|
|
|
|
8,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
8,265
|
|
|
$
|
11,622
|
|
|
$
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used
for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
6,395
|
|
|
$
|
8,739
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
7,506
|
|
|
|
6,360
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
4,339
|
|
|
|
3,694
|
|
Tax credit carry forwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
Book over tax depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
Accrued lease obligations
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
18,878
|
|
|
|
20,428
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
|
18,509
|
|
|
|
19,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
Undistributed foreign earnings
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
Tax over book goodwill amortization
|
|
|
(21,287
|
)
|
|
|
(19,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(23,203
|
)
|
|
|
(20,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, current
|
|
$
|
3,457
|
|
|
$
|
3,253
|
|
Deferred tax (liability), long term
|
|
|
(8,151
|
)
|
|
|
(3,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accounting guidance for accounting for income taxes requires
that we assess the realizability of deferred tax assets at each
reporting period. These assessments generally consider several
factors including the reversal of existing temporary
differences, projected future taxable income, and potential tax
planning strategies. We have valuation allowances totaling $369
and $456 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
related to our state net operating loss carryforwards
(NOLs) that we believe are not likely to be realized based
upon our estimates of future state taxable income limitations of
the use of our state NOLs, and the carryforward life over
which the state tax benefit will be realized.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had $15,252 of gross
federal net operating loss (NOLs) carryforwards, which will
expire in the years 2022 through 2024, and $1,057 of tax
effected state net operating loss (NOLs) carryforwards which
will expire 2010 through 2026. As a result of the initial public
offering completed in June of 2004, an ownership change occurred
under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 which limits our
ability to use pre-change NOLs to reduce future taxable income.
Additionally, a second ownership change occurred in May 2009,
however, since the fair market value of the Companys
shares were significantly higher than at the time of the initial
public offering, there was no change in the applicable
Section 382 limitation that limits our ability to utilize
pre-change NOLs.
Since 2005, the Company has treated its investment in its
Canadian subsidiary as non-permanent in duration and provided
taxes on the undistributed Canadian earnings under the
applicable accounting guidance. In 2008 the Company reassessed
the treatment of the undistributed earnings of its Canadian
subsidiary and determined that approximately $500 of Canadian
earnings are permanently reinvested to meet the Canadian
subsidiarys working capital requirements. The Company has
provided taxes for the remaining undistributed earnings of its
Canadian subsidiary in excess of the permanently reinvested
amount.
65
A reconciliation of the Companys reported income tax
provision (benefit) to the amount computed by multiplying book
income/(loss) before income taxes by the statutory United States
federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
7,868
|
|
|
$
|
10,733
|
|
|
$
|
10,024
|
|
Foreign dividend and repatriation of foreign earnings
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
Effect of foreign tax rates
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
Recognition of tax credits
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
(1,047
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
11,774
|
|
|
|
11,228
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
8,265
|
|
|
$
|
11,622
|
|
|
$
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid in aggregate to United States federal, state
and Canadian tax authorities was $2,938, $2,564 and $1,145 in
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In July 2006, the FASB issued accounting guidance for
uncertainty in income taxes. The accounting guidance for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements also prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. The Company recognizes potential interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in income
tax expense. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has not
identified any uncertain tax positions that would have a
material impact on the Companys financial position.
The tax years that remain subject to examination for the
Companys major tax jurisdictions at December 31, 2009
are shown below:
|
|
|
2004 - 2008
|
|
United States federal income tax
|
2003 - 2008
|
|
United States state and local income tax
|
2005 - 2008
|
|
Canada
|
The Company offers deferred compensation arrangements for
certain key executives and sponsors an employees savings
and retirement plan in which certain employees are eligible to
participate. Subject to their continued employment by the
Company, certain employees offered supplemental pension
arrangements will receive a defined monthly benefit upon
attaining age 65. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Company has accrued $3,146 and $3,008, respectively,
representing the present value of the future benefit payments.
Expenses related to these plans amounted to $217, $154, and $171
in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Participants in the savings and retirement plan may elect to
contribute a portion of their compensation to the plan. The
Company, contributes an amount in cash or other property as
required by the plan. Expenses related to these plans amounted
to $897, $904, and $919 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company also offers a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan. This plan allows certain employees to defer a portion of
their compensation, limited to a maximum of $50 per year, to be
paid to the participants upon retirement. To support the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan, the Company has
elected to purchase Company owned life insurance
(COLI) policies on certain plan participants. The
cash surrender value of the COLI policies is designed to provide
a source for funding the accrued liability. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the cash surrender value of the
COLI policies is $1,757 and $943, respectively and is included
in intangible and other assets, net on the consolidated balance
sheet. The liability for the non-qualified deferred compensation
plan is included in other long-term liabilities and was $1,690
and $1,336 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company also contributes to two multi-employer defined
contribution and seven multi-employer defined benefit plans
which cover certain union employees. Expenses related to these
plans were $572, $575 and $374 in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
66
|
|
Note J.
|
Leases
and Contingencies
|
The Company operates parking facilities under operating leases
expiring on various dates, generally prior to 2019. Certain of
the leases contain options to renew at the Companys
discretion.
Total future annual rent expense is not determinable as a
portion of such future rent is contingent based on revenues. At
December 31, 2009, the Companys minimum rental
commitments, excluding contingent rent provisions under all
non-cancelable operating leases, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010(1)
|
|
$
|
31,073
|
|
2011
|
|
|
24,161
|
|
2012
|
|
|
18,816
|
|
2013
|
|
|
12,080
|
|
2014
|
|
|
7,331
|
|
2015 and thereafter,
|
|
|
15,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
109,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
$5,886 is included in 2010s minimum commitments for leases
that expire in less than one year.
|
Rent expense, including contingent rents, was $101,634, $110,134
and $104,032 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Contingent rent expense was $53,222, $62,013 and $64,874 in
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Contingent rent expense
consists primarily of percentage rent payments, which will cease
at various times as certain leases expire.
As a result of the acquisitions prior to the adoption of the
most recent guidance on business combinations, as of
December 31, 2009, our contingent payment obligations
totaled $1,162, on an aggregate undiscounted basis, which may be
paid over time provided certain performance criteria is
achieved. Such contingent payments will be accounted for as
additional purchase price if the performance criteria is
achieved; accordingly, this contingent payment obligation is not
recorded at December 31, 2009. We have recorded a
contingency obligation for acquisitions subsequent to the
adoption of the most recent guidance on business combinations,
in the amount of $2,841, of which $2,319 is included in the
other
long-term
liabilities and $522 is included in accrued expenses.
|
|
Note K.
|
Management
Contracts and Related Arrangements with Affiliates
|
In connection with the acquisition of a 76% interest in
Executive Parking Industries, LLC, we entered into a management
agreement dated May 1, 1998, with D&E Parking, Inc., a
privately held company owned by Ed Simmons, an executive officer
of the Company, and Dale Stark, an employee of the Company. The
management agreement was for a period of nine years and
terminated on April 30, 2007. In consideration of the
services provided by D&E under this arrangement, we paid
D&E an annual fee of $411 in 2007.
We entered into a consulting agreement with D&E Parking,
Inc. and Dale Stark that became effective on May 1, 2007
after the aforementioned management agreement terminated by its
terms. This consulting agreement was terminated on
April 30, 2009. Per the terms of the agreement,
consideration for services provided was $250 per year. In
addition, the consultant was eligible for a consultant fee of up
to $50 per year. In consideration of the services provided by
D&E under this arrangement, we paid D&E $128 in 2009
and $401 in 2008.
On December 31, 2000, we sold, at fair market value,
certain contract rights to D&E. In July 2007, we bought
back certain contract rights for approximately $1,472 ($850 paid
in cash and $622 gain through the sale of certain contract
rights), representing five locations. The Company continued to
operate an additional location through January 2008, at which
time the location was sold to an unrelated third party. We
received net management fees and reimbursement for support
services in connection with the operation of the parking
facilities from D&E. We recorded net management fees from
D&E of $4 in 2008 and $66 in 2007.
In 2009 and 2008, Standard Parking provided property management
services for twenty separate retail shopping centers and
commercial office buildings in which D&E has an ownership
interest. In 2007, we operated fifteen of these properties. Dale
Stark is the managing member of each of the property ownership
entity. In consideration of the property management services we
provided for these twenty properties, we recorded net management
fees totaling $689, $632 and $500 in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
In 2009, our wholly owned subsidiary, SP Plus Security, Inc.,
formerly known as Preferred Response Security Services, Inc.,
provided security services for two retail shopping center owned
by D&E and one retail shopping centers in 2008 and two
retail shopping centers in 2007. We recorded net management fees
amounting to $30 for these security services in 2009, $34 in
67
2008 and $35 in 2007. In 2009, 2008 and 2007, we provided
sweeping and power washing for two retail shopping facilities in
which D&E has an ownership interest. For these services we
recorded net management fees totaling $1 in 2009 $9 in 2008 and
$9 in 2007.
On June 2, 2004, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with Steamboat Industries LLC, our former parent
company and an affiliate of Mr. Holten
(Steamboat). Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Steamboat exercised its demand registration rights in
April 2009. No registration statement was filed pursuant to the
demand made by Steamboat.
On May 15, 2009, Steamboat transferred all of its rights
under the registration rights agreement to GSO Special
Situations Fund LP, GSO Special Situations Overseas Master
Fund Ltd., GSO Special Situations Overseas Benefit Plan
Fund Ltd., GSO Capital Opportunities Fund LP, and CML
VII, LLC. (collectively, the Significant
Stockholders) together with substantially all of its
Standard Parking common stock, and the Significant Stockholders
agreed in writing to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
Timothy J. White, one of our directors, is a Senior Managing
Director and Co-Head of Mezzanine Investing and Head of Private
Equity Investing for GSO Capital Partners LP, an affiliate of
the GSO funds that are Significant Stockholders. Pursuant to the
registration rights agreement, the Significant Stockholders
exercised their demand registration rights before such rights
terminated on May 27, 2009, and a shelf registration
statement on
Form S-3
was filed pursuant to the Significant Stockholders demand
notice to register all of the 7,581,842 shares of Standard
Parking common stock that they held. On November 9, 2009,
our Company and the Significant Stockholders entered into
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement to cause
the registration statement to remain effective for a period of
two years from the date that it became effective, which was
October 6, 2009. Accordingly, we are required to cause the
registration statement to remain effective until October 6,
2011 or until all 7,581,842 registered shares have been
distributed, whichever occurs first. The registration rights
terminate to the extent these shares of common stock are sold in
a public offering or when a Significant Stockholders
shares all become eligible for sale under Rule 144 during
any consecutive
90-day
period.
On November 9, 2009, we entered into an underwriting
agreement with the Significant Stockholders and Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC and William Blair & Company,
L.L.C., as representatives for the several underwriters,
relating to the public offering of up to 6,592,906 shares
of our common stock by the Significant Stockholders. The
Significant Stockholders also granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase an additional 988,936 shares of our
common stock to cover over-allotments, if any. The underwriting
agreement included customary representations, warranties and
covenants by us and the Significant Stockholders. It also
provided for customary indemnification by each of our Company,
the Significant Stockholders and the underwriters against
certain liabilities and customary contribution provisions in
respect of those liabilities. Of the 7,581,842 registered
shares, the Significant Stockholders sold 6,819,692 shares
pursuant to the registration statement in 2009. We did not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the Significant
Stockholders. We incurred $1,700 of legal, accounting,
registration and related expenses in connection with
Steamboats and the Significant Stockholders
registration demand, the related underwriting agreement, and
costs and expenses associated with the loss of control by our
former parent, Steamboat.
We entered into a one-year restrictive covenants and release
agreement with A. Petter Østberg, a former director,
effective as of August 31, 2009. Pursuant to this
agreement, Mr. Østberg agreed to provide us with certain
services and comply with various restrictive covenants,
including non-competition, non-solicitation and
non-disparagement, and entered into a standard release and
agreement not to sue us, in exchange for $130 payable in
installments beginning in 2010.
|
|
Note L.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought
against us and other loss contingencies are subject to
significant uncertainty. We accrue a charge against income when
our management determines that it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we accrue for the
authoritative judgments or assertions made against us by
government agencies at the time of their rendering regardless of
our intent to appeal. In determining the appropriate accounting
for loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss or
impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. We
regularly evaluate current information available to us to
determine whether an accrual should be established or adjusted.
Estimating the probability that a loss will occur and estimating
the amount of a loss or a range of loss involves significant
judgment.
As previously disclosed, the Company has been in mediation and
discussions with plaintiffs regarding the possible resolution of
a California labor code violations case brought against the
Company in which plaintiffs are seeking class certification of
their claims. Subject to the approval of the court, the Company
has entered into a settlement agreement related to
Jorge
Jaime v. Standard Parking Corporation
and two other
consolidated cases on March 9, 2010. We also have entered
into a memorandum of understanding dated January 5, 2010
for the tentative settlement, subject to court approval, of
Grant v. Preferred Security Services, Inc.,
a
similar labor code violation case in which plaintiffs are
seeking class certification brought against our wholly owned
security subsidiary. The Company estimates that its liability
exposure under the distribution
68
methodology set forth in the tentative settlements for these two
cases to be in the aggregate $2,475. While there is no guarantee
that the settlement methodology will result in this aggregate
payout amount, management believes, after comparing similar
class settlements and the claims made percentages of those
settlements with the purported classes in these two cases, that
the aggregate payout of $2,475 is a reasonable estimate of the
contingent liability.
Property under capital leases included within equipment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service vehicles
|
|
$
|
4,043
|
|
|
$
|
6,795
|
|
Parking equipment
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,107
|
|
|
|
7,292
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,120
|
)
|
|
|
(3,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
3,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $844, $1,432 and $1,758 in 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively, which is included in depreciation
expense.
Future minimum lease payments under capital leases at
December 31, 2009 as well as the present value of the
minimum lease payments through expiration are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
2011
|
|
|
592
|
|
2012
|
|
|
639
|
|
2013
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
Less: Amounts representing interest
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum payments
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term portion
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note N.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill is assigned to respective segments based upon the
specific Region where the assets acquired and associated
goodwill resided.
The following table reflects the changes in the carrying amounts
of goodwill by reported segment for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Two
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Four
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
58,414
|
|
|
$
|
4,949
|
|
|
$
|
33,950
|
|
|
$
|
22,577
|
|
|
$
|
119,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired during the period
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
Adjustments to purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
Contingency payments related to acquisitions
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
61,693
|
|
|
$
|
4,061
|
|
|
$
|
35,219
|
|
|
$
|
22,577
|
|
|
$
|
123,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Adjustments to purchase price
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Contingency payments related to acquisitions
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
61,849
|
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
$
|
35,227
|
|
|
$
|
22,577
|
|
|
$
|
126,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Note O.
|
Long-Term
Receivables, net
|
Long-term receivables, net, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Bradley International Airport
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficiency payments
|
|
$
|
9,606
|
|
|
$
|
5,961
|
|
Other Bradley related, net
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term receivables, net
|
|
$
|
10,325
|
|
|
$
|
6,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement
We are entered into a
25-year
agreement with the State of Connecticut (State) that
expires on April 6, 2025, under which we operate the
surface parking and 3,500 garage parking spaces at Bradley
International Airport located in the Hartford, Connecticut
metropolitan area. The Company manages the facility for which it
is expected to receive a management fee.
The parking garage was financed on April 6, 2000 through
the issuance of $53,800 of State of Connecticut special facility
revenue bonds, representing $47,700 non-taxable Series A
bonds and a separate taxable issuance of $6,100 Series B
bonds. The Series B bonds were retired on July 1, 2006
according to the terms of the indenture. The Bradley agreement
provides that we deposit with a trustee for the bondholders all
gross revenues collected from operations of the surface and
garage parking, and from these gross revenues. Principal and
interest on the Bradley special facility revenue bonds increase
from approximately $3,600 in lease year 2002 to approximately
$4,500 in lease year 2025. Annual guaranteed minimum payments to
the State increase from approximately $8,300 in lease year 2002
to approximately $13,200 in lease year 2024. The annual minimum
guaranteed payment to the State by the trustee for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $9,731 and
$9,531, respectively.
All of the cash flow from the parking facilities are pledged to
the security of the bonds and are collected and deposited with
the bond trustee. Each month the bond trustee makes certain
required monthly distributions, which are characterized as
Guaranteed Payments. To the extent the monthly gross
receipts generated by the parking facilities are not sufficient
for the trustee to make the required Guaranteed Payments, we are
obligated to deliver the deficiency amount to the trustee.
Additionally, the Guaranteed Payments are required to be paid
before we are reimbursed for deficiency payments or management
fees.
The following is the list of Guaranteed Payments:
|
|
|
|
|
Garage and Surface Operating Expenses,
|
|
|
|
Principal and Interest on Bonds,
|
|
|
|
Trustee Expenses
|
|
|
|
Major Maintenance and Capital Improvement Deposits
|
|
|
|
State Minimum Guarantee
|
However, to the extent there is a cash surplus in any month
during the term of the Lease, we have the right to be repaid the
principal amount of any and all deficiency payments, together
with actual interest expenses and a premium, not to exceed 10%
of the initial deficiency payment. We calculate and record
interest income and premium income in the period the associated
deficiency payment is received from the trustee.
Deficiency
Payments
To the extent that monthly gross receipts are not sufficient for
the trustee to make the required payments, we are obligated
pursuant to our agreement, to deliver the deficiency amount to
the trustee within three business days of being notified. We are
responsible for these deficiency payments regardless of the
amount of utilization for the Bradley parking facilities. The
deficiency payments represent contingent interest bearing
advances to the trustee to cover operating cash flow
requirements. To the extent sufficient funds are available in
the appropriate fund, the trustee is then directed by the State
to reimburse us for deficiency payments up to the amount of the
calculated surplus.
In the year ended December 31, 2009, we made deficiency
payments of $3,645 and we did not record or receive any interest
or premium income on deficiency repayments from the trustee. In
the year ended December 31, 2008, we made
70
deficiency payments (net of repayments received) of $1,826 and
received $18 for premium income on deficiency repayments from
the trustee. The receivable from the trustee for interest and
premium income related to deficiency repayments was $0 as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
The payments, if any, are recorded as a receivable by us for
which we are reimbursed from time to time as provided in the
trust agreement. As of December 31, 2009, and
December 31, 2008, we have a receivable of $9,606 and
$5,961, respectively, compromised of cumulative deficiency
payments to the trustee, net of reimbursements. We believe these
advances to be fully recoverable and therefore have not recorded
a valuation allowance for them. We do not guarantee the payment
of any principal or interest on any debt obligations of the
State of Connecticut or the trustee.
Per the Construction, Financing and Operating Special Facility
Lease Agreement, which governs reimbursement of deficiency
payments, places no time restriction or language exists limiting
our right to reimbursement in the Lease.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balance
of the receivable for each year presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deficiency payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,961
|
|
|
$
|
4,135
|
|
Deficiency payments made
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
Deficiency repayment received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
9,606
|
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
Other Bradley related
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term receivables
|
|
$
|
10,325
|
|
|
$
|
6,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
In addition to the recovery of certain general and
administrative expenses incurred, our agreement provides for an
annual management fee payment which is based on three operating
profit tiers calculated for each year during the term of the
agreement. The management fee is further apportioned 60% to us
and 40% to an un-affiliated entity. To the extent that funds are
available for the trustee to make a distribution, the annual
management fee is paid when sufficient cash is paid after the
Guaranteed Payments (as defined in our agreement), and after the
repayment of all deficiency payments, including accrued interest
and premium. However, our right to the management fee accrues
each year during the term of the agreement and is paid when
sufficient cash is available for the trustee to make a
distribution.
The annual management fee is paid after the repayment of all
deficiency payments, including accrued interest and premium,
therefore due to the existence and length of time for repayment
of the deficiency amounts to the Company, no management fees
have been recognized. Management fees will be recognized in
accordance with SAB 104 when collectability is
reasonably assured.
Cumulative management fees of $4,200 have not been recognized as
of December 31, 2009 and no management fees were recognized
during 2009, 2008 or 2007.
|
|
Note P.
|
Stock
Repurchases
|
2009
Stock Repurchases
In July 2008, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase
shares of our common stock, on the open market or through
private purchases, up to $60,000 in aggregate. As of
December 31, 2008, $22,857 remained available for
repurchase under this authorization.
During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased
93,600 shares from third party shareholders at an average
price of $18.23 per share, including average commissions of
$0.03 per share, on the open market. Our former majority
shareholder sold 119,701 shares to us in the first quarter
of 2009 at an average price of $18.20 per share. The total value
of the first quarter transactions was $3,885. We retired
200,650 shares during the first quarter of 2009, and
retired and the remaining 12,651 shares in April 2009.
We did not make any share repurchases in the second, third and
fourth quarters of 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, $18,973 remained available for
repurchase under 2008 authorization by the Board of Directors.
71
2008
Stock Repurchases
In December 2007, the Board of Directors authorized us to
repurchase shares of our common stock, on the open market or
through private purchases, up to $25,000 in aggregate. As of
December 31, 2007, $22,882 remained available for
repurchase under this authorization.
During the first quarter of 2008, we repurchased from third
party shareholders 257,125 shares at an average price of
$20.79 per share, including average commissions of $0.03 per
share, on the open market. Our majority shareholder sold to us
120,111 shares in the first quarter at an average price of
$20.76 per share. The total value of the first quarter
transactions was $7,839. 214,500 shares were retired in
March 2008 and the remaining 162,736 shares were retired in
June 2008.
During the second quarter of 2008, we repurchased from third
party shareholders 120,000 shares at an average price of
$20.70 per share, including average commissions of $0.03 per
share, on the open market. Our majority shareholder sold to us
125,964 shares in the second quarter at an average price of
$20.67 per share. The total value of the second quarter
transactions was $5,087. 173,701 shares were retired in
June 2008 and the remaining 72,263 were retired during the third
quarter.
In July 2008 the Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase
shares of our common stock, on the open market or through
private purchases, up to an additional $60,000 in aggregate.
During the third quarter of 2008, we repurchased from third
party shareholders 565,447 shares at an average price of
$21.19 per share, including average commissions of $0.03 per
share, on the open market. Our majority shareholder sold to us
580,060 shares in the third quarter at an average price of
$21.16 per share. In addition, we repurchased from third party
shareholders 14,600 shares at an average price of $22.66
per share, including average commissions of $0.03 per share, on
the open market. The total value of the third quarter
transactions was $24,586. 994,841 shares were retired
during the third quarter of 2008 and the remaining
165,266 shares were retired in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The December 2007 repurchase authorization by the Board of
Directors was completed in August 2008.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we repurchased from third
party shareholders 640,348 shares at an average price of
$18.34 per share, including average commissions of $0.03 per
share, on the open market. Our majority shareholder sold to us
545,683 shares in the fourth quarter at an average price of
$18.31 per share. In addition, we repurchased from third party
shareholders 24,700 shares at an average price of $18.21
per share, including average commissions of $0.03 per share, on
the open market. Our majority shareholder also sold us its
pro-rata ownership of a third quarter open market repurchase of
14,904 shares at an average price of $22.63 per share. The
total value of the fourth quarter transactions was $22,512.
598,212 shares were retired during the fourth quarter of
2008 and the remaining 627,423 shares were held as treasury
stock and retired during the first quarter of 2009.
As of December 31, 2008, $22,857 remained available for
repurchase under the July 2008 authorization by the Board of
Directors.
|
|
Note Q.
|
Domestic
and Foreign Operations
|
Business
Unit Segment Information
An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise
that engages in business activities from which it may earn
revenue and incur expenses, and about which separate financial
information is regularly evaluated by our chief operating
decision maker, in deciding how to allocate resources. Our chief
operating decision maker is the Companys president and
chief executive officer.
Each of the operating segments is directly responsible for
revenue and expenses related to their operations including
direct regional administrative costs. Finance, information
technology, human resources, and legal are shared functions that
are not allocated back to the four operating segments. The CODM
assesses the performance of each operating segment using
information about its revenue and operating income (loss) before
interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization, but does not
evaluate segments using discrete asset information. There are no
inter-segment transactions and the Company does not allocate
interest and other income, interest expense, depreciation and
amortization or taxes to operating segments. The accounting
policies for segment reporting are the same as for the Company
as a whole.
Our business is managed based on regions administered by
executive vice presidents. The following is a summary of
revenues (excluding reimbursed management contract expense) and
gross profit by regions for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007. Information related to prior periods has
been recast to conform to the current regional alignment.
72
The Company has provided this business unit segment information
for all comparable prior periods. Segment information is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
79,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
53,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region One
|
|
|
132,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
13,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Two
|
|
|
15,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
19,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
54,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Three
|
|
|
74,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
39,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
32,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Four
|
|
|
71,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
695,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
700,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
621,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,641
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
27,679
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
29,711
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
29,382
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region One
|
|
|
32,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
4,823
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
|
101
|
%
|
|
|
1,716
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Two
|
|
|
4,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
21,621
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
26,997
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
23,969
|
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Three
|
|
|
23,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
4,154
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
15,383
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
14,208
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
12,390
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Four
|
|
|
17,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
133
|
%
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
171
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)%
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
631
|
%
|
|
|
2,429
|
|
|
|
114
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
78,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
44,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense percentage of gross profit
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
22,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Excludes reimbursed management contract expenses.
|
Region One encompasses operations in Delaware, District of
Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, Tennessee,
Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
73
Region Two encompasses our Canadian operations, event planning
and transportation, and our technology based parking and traffic
management systems.
Region Three encompasses operations in Arizona, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Washington,
and Wyoming.
Region Four encompasses all major airport and transportation
operations nationwide.
Other consists of ancillary revenue that is not specifically
identifiable to a region and insurance reserve adjustments
related to prior years.
The CODM does not evaluate segments using discrete asset
information.
|
|
Note R.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We measure stock-based compensation expense at the grant date,
based on the fair value of the award, and the expense is
recognized over the requisite employee service period (generally
the vesting period) for awards expected to vest (considering
estimated forfeitures).
The Company has an amended and restated Long-Term Incentive Plan
that was adopted in conjunction with our IPO. On
February 27, 2008, our Board of Directors approved an
amendment to our Long-Term Incentive Plan, subject to
shareholder approval, that increased the maximum number of
shares of common stock available for awards under the Long-Term
Incentive Plan from 2,000,000 to 2,175,000 and extended the
Plans termination date. Our shareholders approved this
Plan amendment on April 22, 2009, and the Plan now
terminates twenty years from the date of such approval, or
April 22, 2028. At December 31, 2009,
113,558 shares remained available for award under the Plan.
In most cases, options granted under the Plan vest at the end of
a three-year period from the date of the award. Options are
granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price at the
date of grant.
Stock
Options and Grants
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
fair value of each option grant as of the date of grant. The
volatilities are based on the 90 day historical volatility
of our common stock as the grant date. The risk free interest
rate is based on zero-coupon U.S. government issues with a
remaining term equal to the expected life of the option. For
options granted prior to 2008, the expected life for options was
calculated using the simplified method. The simplified method
which was calculated as the vesting term plus the contractual
term divided by two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Estimated weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
7.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted average dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
|
34.84
|
%
|
Weighted average risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
Expected life of option (years)
|
|
|
7
|
|
There were no options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
On August 14, 2009, we issued vested stock grants totaling
9,591 shares to certain directors. The total value of the
grant was $165 and is included in general and administrative
expense.
On January 24, 2008, we issued vested stock grants totaling
1,084 shares to a director. The total value of the grant
was $25 and is included in general and administrative expenses.
On April 22, 2008, we issued vested stock grants totaling
18,900 shares to certain directors. The total value of the
grant was $385 and is included in general and administrative
expenses.
On April 25, 2007, we issued stock options, which vested
immediately, to purchase 19,068 shares of common stock at a
market price of $17.02 per share to certain directors.
The Company recognized $195, $411 and $282 of stock based
compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively, which is included in general and
administrative expense. As of December 31, 2009, there was
no unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested options.
74
The following table summarizes the transactions pursuant to our
stock option plans for the last three years ended
December 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
Value
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,021,064
|
|
|
$
|
4.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
19,068
|
|
|
$
|
17.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(228,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
809,064
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(152,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
656,903
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(105,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
551,007
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
551,007
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, options to purchase
551,007, 656,903 and 801,964 shares of common stock,
respectively, were exercisable at weighted average exercise
prices of $4.50, $4.77 and $4.75 per share, respectively. The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $1,386, $2,615,
and $3,204, respectively.
There were no nonvested options as of December 31, 2009 and
2008.
Performance-Based
Incentive Program
In December 2006, the Board of Directors adopted a
performance-based incentive program under our Long-Term
Incentive Plan. This program provides participating executives
with the opportunity to earn a combination of stock (50%) and
cash (50%) if certain performance targets for pre-tax income and
pre-tax free cash flow are achieved. On February 23, 2007,
certain participating executives became entitled to performance
restricted stock based on the stock price at the commencement of
the three year performance cycle (2007
2009) and as a result 16,404 shares were issued
subject to vesting upon the achievement of the performance
goals. On April 13, 2007, an additional 13,294 shares
of the performance restricted stock were issued subject to
vesting upon the achievement of the three year performance goals
to the remaining participating executives. On December 31,
2007, 3,849 shares were released free of restrictions in
accordance with the achievement of the first year performance
goals. On December 31, 2008, 7,072 shares were
released free of restrictions in accordance with the achievement
of the second year performance goals. On August 11, 2009,
2,816 forfeited shares were retired. On December 31, 2009,
6,756 shares were released free of restrictions in
accordance with the achievement of the cumulative program
performance goals. The remaining 9,205 restricted shares that
were unvested as of December 31, 2009 were forfeited.
A summary of the status of the nonvested restricted stock shares
as of December 31, 2009, and changes during the year ended
December 31, 2009, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
Nonvested Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
15,961
|
|
|
|
19.21
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(6,756
|
)
|
|
|
19.21
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(9,205
|
)
|
|
|
19.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total value of the restricted stock awards vested during the
year ended December 31, 2009 was $130.
75
We record stock-based compensation expense for awards with
performance conditions based on the probable outcome of that
performance condition. The Company recognized $51 and $107 of
stock-based compensation expense and $51 and $107 of cash
compensation expense related to the performance-based incentive
program, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, which is included in general and administrative
expenses. As of December 31, 2009, there was $0 of
unrecognized compensation costs related to the performance-based
incentive program.
Restricted
Stock Units
In March 2008, the Companys Compensation Committee and the
Board of Directors authorized a one-time grant of 750,000
restricted stock units that subsequently were awarded to members
of our senior management team on July 1, 2008. In November
2008, an additional 5,000 restricted stock units were also
awarded. The restricted stock units vest in one-third
installments on each of the tenth, eleventh and twelfth
anniversaries of the grant date. The restricted stock unit
agreements provide for accelerated vesting upon the recipient
reaching their retirement age.
The cost of restricted stock units is determined using the fair
value of our common stock on the date of the grant, and
compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period. In
accordance with the guidance related to share-based payments, we
estimate forfeitures at the time of the grant and revise those
estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. We use historical data to estimate
pre-vesting forfeitures and record stock-based compensation
expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.
A summary of the status of the restricted stock units as of
December 31, 2009, and changes during the year ended
December 31, 2009, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
Nonvested Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
755,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.26
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
755,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized $2,046 and $991 of stock based
compensation expense related to the restricted stock units for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
which is included in general and administrative expense. As of
December 31, 2009, there was $9,865 of unrecognized
stock-based compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to the restricted stock units that is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
7.1 years. As of December 31, 2008, there was $11,661
of unrecognized stock-based compensation costs, net of estimated
forfeitures related to the restricted stock units that is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
7.8 years.
|
|
Note S.
|
Hurricane
Katrina
|
On May 2, 2008, we entered into a definitive settlement
agreement with our insurance carrier which finalized all of our
open claims with respect to Hurricane Katrina. The settlement
agreement was for $4,225 of which $2,000 was received
previously. We were required to reimburse the owners of the
leased and managed locations for property damage of
approximately $2,228. After payment of settlement fees, expenses
and other amounts due under contractual arrangements, we
recorded $1,997 in pre-tax income, of which $1,577 was recorded
as revenue and $420 was recorded as a reduction of general and
administrative expenses.
76
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
STANDARD PARKING
CORPORATION
James A. Wilhelm
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 12, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
James
A. Wilhelm
James
A. Wilhelm
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Charles
L. Biggs
Charles
L. Biggs
|
|
Director
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Karen
M. Garrison
Karen
M. Garrison
|
|
Director
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
John
V. Holten
John
V. Holten
|
|
Director
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Robert
S. Roath
Robert
S. Roath
|
|
Director
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Timothy
J. White
Timothy
J. White
|
|
Director
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
G.
Marc Baumann
G.
Marc Baumann
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Daniel
R. Meyer
Daniel
R. Meyer
|
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Assistant
Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized
Officer)
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
77
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
End of
|
Description
|
|
Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Reductions(1)
|
|
Year(2)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
3,867
|
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
$
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,002
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
(833
|
)
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax valuation account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
369
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
456
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries
and reversal of provision.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes long-term receivables valuation allowance of
$2.5 million.
|
78
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company filed on June 2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
3.1.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of
January 7, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
3.2
|
|
Fouth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated
January 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 27, 2010).
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 18, 2004).
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 15, 2008
among the Company, various financial institutions, Bank of
America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 18, 2008.
|
10.2
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
between the Company and Wells Fargo (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010).
|
10.3
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
between the Company and Fifth Third (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010).
|
10.4
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated May 15, 2006 by and among the
Company, D&E Parking, Inc. and Dale G. Stark (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 17, 2006).
|
10.5+
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 30, 1998 between the
Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.6 of the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-4,
File
No. 333-50437,
filed on April 17, 1998).
|
10.5.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 7, 2003
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.1 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
10.5.2+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.2 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
10.6+
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 26, 1998 between the
Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.12 of the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-4,
File
No. 333-50437,
filed on April 17, 1998).
|
10.6.1+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of June 19, 2000
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.1 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.6.2+
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
December 6, 2000, between the Company and Michael K. Wolf,
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2000).
|
10.6.3+
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2002
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.19.3 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.6.4+
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 31,
2003 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.4 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.6.5+
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 18,
2008 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.5 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.6.6+
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 28,
2009 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
10.7+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
January 28, 2009 between Company and James A. Wilhelm
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
10.8+
|
|
Employment Agreement dated May 18, 1998 between the Company
and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.24 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
79
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.8.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
November 7, 2001 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.25 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
10.8.2+
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
August 1, 2003 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.2 of the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.8.3+
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
April 1, 2005 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.3 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.8.4+
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
December 29, 2008 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.4 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.8.5+
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
January 28, 2009 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.5 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.9+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
December 1, 2002 between the Company and John Ricchiuto
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22.2 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.9.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated as of April 11, 2005, between the Company
and John Ricchiuto (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
10.10+
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 1,
2005, between the Company and Steven A. Warshauer (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
10.11+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
May 18, 2006 between the Company and Edward E. Simmons
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 24, 2006).
|
10.12+
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company
and G. Marc Baumann dated as of October 1, 2001
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.27 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
10.12.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of
December 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.11.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.12.2+
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of
January 28, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
10.13+
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2005, between the Company and Thomas L. Hagerman
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
10.13.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated October 1, 2007 between the Company and
Thomas Hagerman (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed for September 30, 2007).
|
10.14*+
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 15, 2005 between
the Company and Gerard M. Klaisle.
|
10.14.1*+
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated December 29, 2008 between the Company and
Gerard M. Klaisle.
|
10.15+
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan dated as of May 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 of Amendment
No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 10, 2004).
|
10.15.1+
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan Amendment effective as of
April 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Appendix B of the Companys 2008 Proxy on
Form DEF 14A, filed on April 1, 2008).
|
10.16+
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Stock Option Award Agreement
between the Company and an optionee (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 21, 2005).
|
10.16.1+
|
|
Form of First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Stock Option
Award Agreement between the Company and an optionee
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 21, 2005).
|
80
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.17
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated as of October 16, 2001 between
the Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.36 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
10.17.1
|
|
Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.14.1 of the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
10.18
|
|
Executive Parking Management Agreement dated as of May 1,
1998 by and among the Company, D&E Parking, Edward E.
Simmons and Dale G. Stark (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.32 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.18.1
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Parking Management Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1999 by and among the Company, D&E
Parking, Edward E. Simmons and Dale G. Stark (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.32.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
10.19
|
|
Consulting Agreement effective as of May 1, 2007 by and
among the Company, D&E Parking, Inc. and Dale G. Stark
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for December 31, 2007).
|
10.20
|
|
Property Management Agreement dated as of September 1, 2003
between the Company and Paxton Plaza, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.19 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.21
|
|
Property Management Agreement dated as of September 1, 2003
between the Company and Infinity Equities, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.20 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22
|
|
Agreement of Lease dated as of June 4, 1998 between the
Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to LaSalle
National Bank. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21
of the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22.1
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of May 1,
1999 between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.21.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22.2
|
|
Second Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of July 27,
2000 between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.21.2 of the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.22.3
|
|
Third Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of
September 11, 2003 between the Company and LaSalle National
Bank, as successor trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as
successor trustee to LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.21.3 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
10.23+
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated as of March 1, 2004 between the
Company and Gunnar E. Klintberg (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.24 of Amendment No. 1 to the Companys
Registration
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 10, 2004).
|
10.23.1+
|
|
First Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated March 15,
2006 between the Company and Gunnar E. Klintberg (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.24.1 of the Companys
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 16, 2006).
|
10.24
|
|
Form of Property Management Agreement (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.30 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 10, 2006).
|
10.25
|
|
Form of Standard Parking Corporation Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement dated as of July 1, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 2, 2008).
|
10.25.1
|
|
First Amendment to Form of Standard Parking Corporation
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
as filed on August 6, 2009).
|
10.26
|
|
Guaranty Agreement of APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc. dated as of
March 2000 to and for the benefit of the State of Connecticut,
Department of Transportation (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.27 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.27
|
|
Construction, Financing and Operating Special Facility Lease
Agreement dated as of March 2000 between the State of
Connecticut Department of Transportation and APCOA Bradley
Parking Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.28 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
81
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.28
|
|
Trust Indenture dated March 1, 2000 between State of
Connecticut and First Union National Bank as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.29 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
10.29
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated June 2, 2004 between
the Company and Steamboat, as amended to join additional
financial institutions as parties on May 15, 2009
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
as filed on May 18, 2009).
|
10.29.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as
of November 9, 2009, by and among the Company, and GSO
Special Situations Fund LP, GSO Special Situations Overseas
Master Fund Ltd., GSO Special Situations Overseas Benefit
Plan Fund Ltd., GSO Capital Opportunities Fund LP, and
CML VII, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of
the Companys Current Report of
Form 8-K
filed on November 12, 2009).
|
10.30*
|
|
Restrictive Covenants and Release Agreement effective as of
August 31, 2009 between the Company and A. Petter
Østberg.
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to exhibit 14.1
of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for December 31, 2002).
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
23*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated
as of March 12, 2010.
|
31.1*
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 12, 2010 for
James A. Wilhelm, Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer).
|
31.2*
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 12, 2010 for G.
Marc Baumann, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer).
|
31.3*
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 12, 2010 for
Daniel R. Meyer, Senior Vice President Corporate Controller and
Assistant Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer and Duly
Authorized Officer).
|
32*
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, dated March 12, 2010.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
+
|
|
Management contract or compensation plan, contract or agreement.
|
82