Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
     
o   Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the transition period from                      to                      .
Commission file number 000-53036
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Indiana   20-2327916
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    
1554 N. County Road 600 E., Union City, IN 47390
(Address of principal executive offices)
(765) 964-3137
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer þ   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: As of May 14, 2010 there were 14,606 units outstanding.
 
 

 

 


 

INDEX
         
    Page No.  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    17  
 
       
    30  
 
       
    32  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    34  
 
       
    34  
 
       
  Exhibit 10.1
  Exhibit 10.2
  Exhibit 10.3
  Exhibit 31.1
  Exhibit 31.2
  Exhibit 32.1
  Exhibit 32.2

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  
Financial Statements
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Balance Sheets
                 
    March 31, 2010     September 30, 2009  
    (Unaudited)          
ASSETS
               
 
               
Current Assets
               
Cash
  $ 5,790,752     $ 7,265,125  
Restricted cash
    237,676        
Trade accounts receivable
    14,777,411       5,945,146  
Miscellaneous receivables
    327,862       1,021,479  
Inventories
    6,245,047       5,791,302  
Deposits
    784,714       1,045,079  
Prepaid and other current assets
    1,080,133       846,771  
Derivative instruments
    772,182       135,012  
 
           
Total current assets
    30,015,777       22,049,914  
 
               
Property and Equipment
               
Land and land improvements
    20,994,169       20,978,132  
Plant and equipment
    116,940,308       116,888,805  
Building
    6,991,721       6,991,721  
Office equipment
    313,805       307,494  
Vehicles
    31,928       31,928  
Construction in process
    528,525        
 
           
 
    145,800,456       145,198,080  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (12,110,745 )     (7,988,509 )
 
           
Net property and equipment
    133,689,711       137,209,571  
 
               
Other Assets
               
Deposits
    313,260       368,808  
Investment
    266,583        
Financing costs, net of amortization
    592,761       699,959  
 
           
Total other assets
    1,172,604       1,068,767  
 
           
 
               
Total Assets
  $ 164,878,092     $ 160,328,252  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
 
               
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 1,569,992     $ 1,329,785  
Accounts payable- corn
    3,759,068       1,556,398  
Construction retainage payable
    351,700       351,700  
Accrued expenses
    1,256,457       1,533,963  
Deferred revenue
    237,676        
Derivative instruments
    1,142,702       861,569  
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    8,168,253       7,402,860  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    16,485,848       13,036,275  
 
               
Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
    62,441,324       77,427,000  
 
               
Derivative Instruments
    2,726,406       3,269,980  
 
               
Commitments and Contingencies
               
 
               
Members’ Equity
               
Members’ contributions, net of cost of raising capital,14,606 units outstanding
    70,912,213       70,912,213  
Distributions
    (876,360 )      
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (3,869,108 )     (4,131,549 )
Accumulated income (deficit)
    17,057,769       (185,667 )
 
           
Total members’ equity
    83,224,514       66,594,997  
 
           
 
               
Total Liabilities and Members’ Equity
  $ 164,878,092     $ 160,328,252  
 
           
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.

 

3


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Condensed Statements of Operations
                 
    Three Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
    March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
    (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)  
 
               
Revenues
  $ 54,805,570     $ 47,664,537  
 
               
Cost of Goods Sold
    46,194,728       48,309,527  
 
           
 
               
Gross Profit (Loss)
    8,610,842       (644,990 )
 
               
Operating Expenses
               
Professional fees
    165,872       221,265  
General and administrative
    792,211       794,341  
 
           
Total
    958,083       1,015,606  
 
           
 
               
Operating Income (Loss)
    7,652,759       (1,660,596 )
 
               
Other Income (Expense)
               
Grant income
          917  
Interest income
    683        
Interest expense
    (1,199,081 )     (775,993 )
Miscellaneous income
    2,250       540  
 
           
Total
    (1,196,148 )     (774,536 )
 
           
 
               
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 6,456,611     $ (2,435,132 )
 
           
 
               
Weighted Average Units Outstanding — basic and diluted
    14,606       14,606  
 
           
 
               
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit — basic and diluted
  $ 442.05     $ (166.72 )
 
           
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.

 

4


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Statements of Operations
                 
    Six Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
    (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)  
 
               
Revenues
  $ 118,355,441     $ 71,686,402  
 
               
Cost of Goods Sold
    96,793,063       74,737,350  
 
           
 
               
Gross Profit (Loss)
    21,562,378       (3,050,948 )
 
               
Operating Expenses
               
Professional fees
    382,276       365,013  
General and administrative
    1,479,660       1,246,966  
 
           
Total
    1,861,936       1,611,979  
 
           
 
               
Operating Income (Loss)
    19,700,442       (4,662,927 )
 
               
Other Income (Expense)
               
Grant income
          917  
Interest income
    1,389        
Interest expense
    (2,505,414 )     (1,475,447 )
Miscellaneous income
    47,019       11,518  
 
           
Total
    (2,457,006 )     (1,463,012 )
 
           
 
               
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 17,243,436     $ (6,125,939 )
 
           
 
               
Weighted Average Units Outstanding — basic and diluted
    14,606       14,606  
 
           
 
               
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit — basic and diluted
  $ 1,180.57     $ (419.41 )
 
           
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.

 

5


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Statements of Cash Flows
                 
    Six Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
    (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
               
Net income (loss)
  $ 17,243,436     $ (6,125,939 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operations:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    4,229,434       3,960,729  
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
    (2,255,170 )     (625,181 )
Dividend income
    (266,583 )      
Change in assets and liabilities:
               
Trade accounts receivables
    (8,832,265 )     (11,529,505 )
Miscellaneous receivable
    693,617       (20,866 )
Inventories
    (453,745 )     (7,248,809 )
Prepaid and other current assets
    (233,362 )     (1,038,823 )
Deposits
    315,913       (159,557 )
Derivative instruments
    1,618,000       564,925  
Accounts payable
    240,207       950,522  
Accounts payable-corn
    2,202,670       3,233,087  
Deferred revenue
    237,676        
Accrued expenses
    (277,506 )     58,993  
 
           
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
    14,462,322       (17,980,424 )
 
               
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
               
Capital expenditures
    (73,851 )     (365,076 )
Payments for construction in process
    (528,525 )     (12,481,871 )
Change in restricted cash
    (237,676 )      
 
           
Net cash used for investing activities
    (840,052 )     (12,846,947 )
 
               
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
               
Checks written in excess of bank balances
          16,612  
Dividends paid
    (876,360 )      
Proceeds from line of credit
          6,210,000  
Payments for financing costs
          (24,098 )
Payments for capital lease obligations
    (3,831 )     (3,517 )
Proceeds from long-term debt
          24,181,058  
Payments on long-term debt
    (14,216,452 )      
 
           
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
    (15,096,643 )     30,380,055  
 
           
 
               
Net Decrease in Cash
    (1,474,373 )     (447,316 )
 
               
Cash — Beginning of Period
    7,265,125       461,535  
 
           
 
               
Cash — End of Period
  $ 5,790,752     $ 14,219  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
               
Interest paid, net of $0 and $387,167 capitalized, respectively
  $ 2,700,504     $ 1,489,123  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
               
 
               
Construction costs in construction retainage and accounts payable
  $ 351,700     $ 889,011  
 
           
Financing costs in accounts payable
          6,000  
 
           
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments included in other comprehensive income
    262,441       (3,293,373 )
 
           
Accrued early completion bonus included in fixed assets
          750,000  
 
           
Amortization of financing costs capitalized
          17,243  
 
           
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.

 

6


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. These financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2009, contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.
In the opinion of management, the interim condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation. The adjustments made to these statements consist only of normal recurring adjustments.
Nature of Business
Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, (an Indiana Limited Liability Company) was organized on February 7, 2005 to pool investors to build a 100 million gallon annual production ethanol plant near Union City, Indiana. The Company was originally named Indiana Ethanol, LLC and changed its name to Cardinal Ethanol, LLC effective September 27, 2005. The construction of the ethanol plant was substantially completed in November 2008 and began operations at that time. Prior to November 2008, the Company was in the development stage with its efforts being principally devoted to organizational activities and construction of the plant.
Accounting Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. The Company uses estimates and assumptions in accounting for the following significant matters, among others, the useful lives of fixed assets; allowance for doubtful accounts; the valuation of basis and delay price contracts on corn purchases; derivatives, inventory, fixed assets, and inventory purchase commitments. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to the financial statements. The Company periodically reviews estimates and assumptions, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period in which the revision is made.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories consist of raw materials, work in process, finished goods and parts. Corn is the primary raw material. Finished goods consist of ethanol, dried distiller grains and corn oil. Cost for substantially all inventory is determined using the lower of (average) cost or market.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and financing costs, subject to depreciation and amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.

 

7


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
Restricted Cash
The Company maintains restricted cash balances related to the Development Agreement described in Note 8.
Revenue Recognition
The Company generally sells ethanol and related products pursuant to marketing agreements. Revenues from the production of ethanol and the related products are recorded when the customer has taken title and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, prices are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company believes that there are no ethanol sales, during any given month, which should be considered contingent and recorded as deferred revenue. The Company’s products are sold FOB shipping point.
In accordance with the Company’s agreements for the marketing and sale of ethanol and related products, marketing fees, commissions and freight due to the marketers are deducted from the gross sales price at the time incurred. Commissions were approximately $605,000 and $1,385,000 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. Freight was approximately $2,530,000 and $5,290,000 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. Revenue is recorded net of these commissions and freight as they do not provide an identifiable benefit that is sufficiently separable from the sale of ethanol and related products.
Net Income (Loss) per Unit
Basic net income (loss) per unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of members’ units outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per unit is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of members’ units and members’ unit equivalents outstanding during the period. There were no member unit equivalents outstanding during the periods presented; accordingly, the Company’s basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit are the same.
Reclassifications
The presentation of certain items in the financial statements for 2009 has been changed to conform to the classifications used in 2010. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or retained earnings as previously reported.
2. CONCENTRATIONS
One major customer accounted for approximately 92% of the outstanding accounts receivable balance at March 31, 2010. This same customer accounted for approximately 83% and 85% of revenue for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, respectively.
3. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
                 
    March 31,2010     September 30, 2009  
    (Unaudited)          
Raw materials
  $ 1,460,692     $ 1,806,167  
Work in progress
    1,375,038       1,348,451  
Finished goods
    2,526,466       2,021,267  
Spare parts
    882,851       615,417  
 
           
 
Total
  $ 6,245,047     $ 5,791,302  
 
           

 

8


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into forward purchase contracts for its commodity purchases and sales. At March 31, 2010, the Company has forward corn purchase contracts at various fixed prices for various delivery periods through December 2011 for a total commitment of approximately $13,346,000. Approximately $2,055,000 of the forward corn purchases were with a related party. Given the uncertainty of future ethanol and corn prices, the Company could incur a loss on the outstanding corn purchase contracts in future periods. Management has evaluated these forward contracts using a methodology similar to that used in the impairment evaluation with respect to inventory valuation, and has determined that no impairment existed at March 31, 2010.
4. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had entered into corn derivative instruments and interest rate swap agreements, which are required to be recorded as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. Derivatives qualify for treatment as hedges when there is a high correlation between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the related change in value of the underlying hedged item. The Company must designate the hedging instruments based upon the exposure being hedged as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge against foreign currency exposure. The Company formally documents, designates, and assesses the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting initially and on an on-going basis.
Commodity Contracts
The Company enters into corn commodity-based derivatives in order to protect cash flows from fluctuations caused by volatility in commodity prices for periods for which we have forward corn purchase contracts open in order to minimize gross profit margin risk from potentially adverse effects of market and price volatility on corn purchase commitments where the prices are set at a future date. These derivatives are not designated as effective hedges for accounting purposes. For derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges, or for the ineffective portions of qualifying hedges, the change in fair value is recorded through earnings in the period of change. Corn derivative changes in fair market value are included in costs of goods sold.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company has open short positions for 3,615,000 bushels of corn and long positions for 1,135,000 bushels of corn on the Chicago Board of Trade to hedge its forward corn contracts and corn inventory. These derivatives are not designated as an effective hedge for accounting purposes. Corn derivatives are forecasted to settle for various delivery periods through December 2011. There may be offsetting positions that are not shown on a net basis that could lower the notional amount of positions outstanding as disclosed above.
Interest Rate Contract
The Company manages its floating rate debt using an interest rate swap. The Company entered into a fixed rate swap to alter its exposure to the impact of changing interest rates on its results of operations and future cash outflows for interest. Fixed rate swaps are used to reduce the Company’s risk of the possibility of increased interest costs. Interest rate swap contracts are therefore used by the Company to separate interest rate risk management from the debt funding decision.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $39,400,000 of notional amount outstanding in the swap agreement that exchange variable interest rates (LIBOR) for fixed interest rates over the terms of the agreements and are designated as cash flow hedges of the interest rate risk attributable to forecasted variable interest payments. The effective portion of the fair value gains or losses on this swap is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).
The interest rate swaps held by the Company as of March 31, 2010 qualified as a cash flow hedge. For this qualifying hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value is recognized through earnings when the underlying transaction being hedged affects earnings, allowing a derivative’s gains and losses to offset related results from the hedged item on the income statement.

 

9


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
The following table provides details regarding the Company’s derivative financial instruments at March 31, 2010:
                     
Instrument   Balance Sheet Location   Assets     Liabilities  
 
                   
Interest rate swap
  Derivative Instruments — Current   $     $ 1,142,702  
Interest rate swap
  Derivative Instruments — Long Term           2,726,406  
Corn contracts
  Derivative Instruments — Current     772,182        
The following tables provide details regarding the gains and (losses) from the Company’s derivative instruments in other comprehensive income and statement of operations for the three months ended March 31:
                         
                    Amount of (Loss)  
                    Reclassified from  
                    Accumulated OCI into  
    Derivative in Cash     Amount of (Loss) Recognized in     interest expense on  
    Flow Hedging     OCI on Derivative - Three-months     Derivative - Three-months  
    Relationship     ended March 31     ended March 31  
 
                       
2010
  Interest rate swap   $ (737,695 )   $ (479,534 )
 
                   
 
                       
2009
  Interest rate swap   $ (68,073 )   $  
 
                   
                 
Derivatives not            
Designated as   Location of Gain recognized in     Amount of Gain recognized  
Hedging Instruments   Statement of Operations     in Income on Derivatives  
 
               
Commodity Contracts
  Cost of Goods Sold   $ 3,164,794  
The following tables provide details regarding the gains and (losses) from the Company’s derivative instruments in other comprehensive income and statement of operations for the six months ended March 31:
                         
                    Amount of (Loss)  
                    Reclassified from  
                    Accumulated OCI into  
    Derivative in Cash     Amount of (Loss) Recognized in     interest expense on  
    Flow Hedging     OCI on Derivative - Six-months     Derivative - Six-months  
    Relationship     ended March 31     ended March 31  
 
                       
2010
  Interest rate swap   $ (710,553 )   $ (972,993 )
 
                   
 
                       
2009
  Interest rate swap   $ (3,293,373 )   $  
 
                   

 

10


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
                 
Derivatives not            
Designated as   Location of Gain recognized in     Amount of Gain recognized  
Hedging Instruments   Statement of Operations     in Income on Derivatives  
 
               
Commodity Contracts
  Cost of Goods Sold   $ 2,255,170  
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Various inputs are considered when determining the value of financial instruments. The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in these securities. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
   
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
   
Level 2 inputs include the following:
   
Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities.
 
   
Quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
 
   
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
 
   
Inputs that are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
   
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The following table provides information on those assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010:
                                         
                    Fair Value Measurement Using  
    Carrying Amount     Fair Value     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
Interest rate swap liability
  $ 3,869,108     $ 3,869,108     $     $ 3,869,108     $  
Commodity derivative instruments
  $ 772,182     $ 772,182     $ 772,182     $     $  
We determine the fair value of the interest rate swap shown in the table above by using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each instrument. The analysis reflects the contractual terms of the swap agreement, including the period to maturity and uses observable market-based inputs and uses the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted expected variable cash payments. We determine the fair value of commodity derivative instruments by obtaining fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes and live trading levels from the Chicago Board of Trade market.
6. BANK FINANCING
On December 19, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive loan agreement with a financial institution for a construction loan of up to $83,000,000, a short-term revolving line of credit of $10,000,000 and letters of credit of $3,000,000. In connection with this agreement, the Company also entered into an interest rate swap agreement fixing the interest rate on $41,500,000 of debt. In April 2009, the construction loan was converted into three separate term loans: a fixed rate note, a variable rate note, and a long term revolving note. The fixed rate note is applicable to the interest rate swap agreement. The term loans have a maturity of five years with a ten-year amortization.

 

11


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
Line of Credit
In December 2008, the Company extended the $10,000,000 short-term revolving line of credit to expire in December 2009, which is subject to certain borrowing base limitations. In December 2009, the Company extended the short-term revolving line of credit to February 2010. In February 2010, the Company extended the short-term line of credit through February 2011. In addition, the Company amended the interest rate on the short-term revolving line of credit to the greater of the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 400 basis points or 5%, previously the greater of the 1-month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points or 5%. The spread over the 3-month LIBOR rate shall adjust down based on the Company meeting certain debt to net worth ratios, measured quarterly. There were no outstanding borrowings on the line of credit at March 31, 2010 or September 30, 2009.
Fixed Rate Note
The Company has an interest rate swap contract in connection with the note payable to its bank that contains a variable rate. The agreement requires the Company to hedge this note principal balance, up to $41,500,000, and matures on April 8, 2014. The variable interest rate is determined quarterly based on the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points. The fixed interest rate set by the swap is 8.11%.
The fair value of the interest rate swap at March 31, 2010 was $3,869,108 and was $4,131,549 at September 30, 2009 and is included in current and long term liabilities on the balance sheet (Note 4). The Company is required to make quarterly principal and accrued interest payments commencing July 2009 through April 2014. Although the Company may prepay this note, it would be subject to prepayment penalties to make bank whole if it did so. The outstanding balance of this note was $39,435,848 and $40,816,864 at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and is included in current liabilities and long-term debt.
Variable Rate Note and Long Term Revolving Note
The Company is required to make quarterly payments of $1,546,162 to be applied first to accrued interest on the long term revolving note, then to accrued interest on the variable rate note, and finally to principal on the variable rate note which commenced July 2009 and continuing through April 2014. Once the variable rate note is paid in full, the payment shall be applied first to accrued interest on the long term revolving note and then to the principal outstanding on the long term revolving note until the balance is paid in full.
The maximum availability on the long term revolving note shall reduce by $250,000 each quarter. The Company is required to pay each quarter the amount necessary to reduce the outstanding principal balance of the long term revolving note so that it is within the maximum availability applicable on each reduction date.
Interest on the variable rate note accrues at the greater of the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points or 5%. At March 31, 2010, the interest rate was 5%. Interest on the long term revolving note accrues at the greater of the 1-month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points or 5%. At March 31, 2010, the interest rate was 5%. The spread over the 3-month LIBOR rate shall adjust down based on the Company meeting certain debt to net worth ratios, measured quarterly. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 the balance on the variable rate note was $27,822,917 and $30,728,352, respectively. There were no outstanding borrowings on the long term revolving note at March 31, 2010. The outstanding balance of the long term revolving note was $9,750,000 at September 30, 2009. The maximum availability on the long term revolver at March 31, 2009 was $9,250,000.

 

12


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
Corn Oil Extraction Note
In July 2008, the Company and the financial institution amended the construction loan for an additional $3,600,000 to be used for the installation of a corn oil extraction system and related equipment. In April 2009, the Corn Oil Extraction note was converted into a term note with interest at the greater of the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points, or 5%, provided no event of default exists. Principal will be due in quarterly installments of $90,000, plus accrued interest, commencing in July 2009 through April 2014. The interest shall adjust based on the Company meeting certain financial targets, measured quarterly. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 the balance on the corn oil extraction note was $3,330,000 and $3,510,000, respectively.
Letter of Credit
At March 31, 2010, the Company had one letter of credit outstanding for $450,000. The financial institution issued the letter of credit in August 2009 to replace an electrical services security deposit (Note 8).
These loans are subject to protective covenants, which restrict distributions and require the Company to maintain various financial ratios, are secured by all business assets, and require additional loan payments based on excess cash flow. The covenants went into effect in April 2009. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2010 and the Company anticipates that they will meet these covenants through April 1, 2011. A portion of the note will be subject to an annual, mandatory prepayment, based on excess cash flow, capped at $4,000,000 annually and $12,000,000 over the life of the loan.
In February 2010, the Company amended the construction loan to require the Company to prepay not less than $2,000,000 of the Company’s excess cash flow for the 2010 fiscal year, with not less than $1,000,000 due on or before March 31, 2010, and the remaining balance due June 30, 2010. The Company has the option to apply the prepayments either to the variable rate note or the long term revolving note. If any amount is applied to the long term revolving note, the amount available for borrowing on the long term revolving note will be reduced by the amount prepaid on and applied to the long term revolving note. The Company made a prepayment of $1,000,000 in February 2010 which was applied to the variable rate note.
Long-term debt, as discussed above, consists of the following at March 31, 2010:
         
Fixed rate loan
  $ 39,435,848  
Variable rate loan
    27,822,917  
Corn oil extraction note
    3,330,000  
Capital lease obligation (Note 7)
    20,812  
 
     
Totals
    70,609,577  
 
       
Less amounts due within one year
    8,168,253  
 
     
 
       
Net long-term debt
  $ 62,441,324  
 
     
The estimated maturities of long-term debt at March 31, 2010 are as follows:
         
2011
  $ 8,168,253  
2012
    8,692,613  
2013
    9,230,339  
2014
    9,809,216  
2015
    34,709,156  
 
     
Total long-term debt
  $ 70,609,577  
 
     

 

13


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
7. LEASES
In July 2008, the Company entered into a five-year lease agreement with an unrelated party for 180 covered hopper cars. The Company is paying approximately $480 per car per month beginning in November 2008 through October 2013. In addition, a surcharge of $0.03 per mile will be assessed for each mile in excess of 36,000 miles per year a car travels.
The Company leases equipment from an unrelated party under a capital lease at an implicit rate of 5.49%. Lease payments began in November 2008 and are payable in monthly installments of $744 through October 2012. As of March 31, 2010, costs of leased capital assets were recorded in machinery and equipment for $31,889.
The Company leases equipment under non-cancelable long-term operating leases. These leases have initial terms ranging from 4 to 6 years, with minimum monthly payments of $4,000 at March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had the following commitments for payments of rentals under leases which at inception had a non-cancelable term of more than one year:
                         
    Capital     Operating     Total  
2011
  $ 8,184     $ 1,084,800     $ 1,092,984  
2012
    8,928       1,084,800       1,093,728  
2013
    5,208       1,078,280       1,083,488  
2014
          622,714       622,714  
 
                 
Total minimum lease commitments
    22,320       3,870,594       3,892,914  
Less interest
    (1,508 )           (1,508 )
 
                 
Present value of minimum lease payments
  $ 20,812     $ 3,870,594     $ 3,891,406  
 
                 
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Software License Agreement
In October 2009, the Company entered into a license agreement effective September 30, 2009 for operational software to improve production and reduce costs. The total charge for the license to use the software is $1,825,000 payable over time as certain milestones are achieved. The Company will incur approximately $100,000 in additional costs in connection with this agreement as well as costs related to an annual maintenance fee. As of March 31, 2010, approximately $445,000 had been paid related to this contract and is included in construction in process on the balance sheet.
Development Agreement
In September 2007, the Company entered into a development agreement with Randolph County Redevelopment Commission to promote economic development in the area. Under the terms of this agreement, beginning in January 2008 through December 2028, the money the Company pays toward property tax expense is allocated to an expense and acquisition account and the amount allocated to the acquisition account will be refunded to the Company periodically at the Company’s request. These funds are restricted for the use of purchasing equipment for the plant. At March 31, 2010 all funds in the expense and acquisition account had been paid out to the Company and are included in restricted cash and deferred revenue on the balance sheet.
Carbon Dioxide Agreement
In March 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated party to sell the raw carbon dioxide gas produced as a byproduct at the Company’s ethanol production facility. As part of the agreement, the unrelated company shall lease a portion of the Company’s property and construct a carbon dioxide liquefaction plant. The Company shall supply raw carbon dioxide to the plant at a rate sufficient for production of 6.25 tons of liquid carbon dioxide per hour and will receive a price of $5.00 per ton of liquid carbon dioxide shipped, with price incentives for increased production levels specified in the contract. The Company shall be paid for a minimum of 40,000 tons each year or approximately $200,000 annually. The initial term of the agreement is for a period of ten years commencing on the start-up date of the plant, but no later than June 1, 2010 and will automatically renew for two additional five year terms thereafter unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the agreement.

 

14


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
Bushel Bin Storage Agreement
In May 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated party for the construction of a bushel bin system with a capacity of 730,248 bushels of corn storage. The total costs to construct the bushel bin system are $1,746,000 and requires that construction begin June 1, 2010 and be completed no later than October 1, 2010. In May 2010 the Company made a downpayment of $436,500, which is included in construction in process at March 31, 2010. Once construction commences, the agreement requires monthly progress payments throughout the construction period, as invoiced by the unrelated party. The Company has the right to suspend, delay or terminate the contract for reasons specified with the contract without further remedy to the unrelated party and may also terminate without cause, remunerating the unrelated party for all proven loss cost or expense related with the construction and no other remedy by the unrelated party.
Contingencies
In February 2010, a lawsuit against the Company was filed by another unrelated party claiming the Company’s operation of the oil separation system is a patent infringement. In connection with the lawsuit, in February 2010, the agreement for the construction and installation of the tricanter oil separation system was amended. In this amendment the manufacturer and installer of the tricanter oil separation system indemnifies the Company against all claims of infringement of patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights from the Company’s purchase and use of the tricanter oil system and agrees to defend the Company in the lawsuit filed at no expense to the Company.
9. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are designated as and meet all of the required criteria for a cash flow hedge. Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss all related to the interest rate swap for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
                 
    2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of quarter
  $ (3,610,947 )   $ (4,978,498 )
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
    (258,161 )     (68,073 )
 
           
Balance at end of quarter
  $ (3,869,108 )   $ (5,046,571 )
 
           
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss all related to the interest rate swap for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
                 
    2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of year
  $ (4,131,549 )   $ (1,753,198 )
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments
    262,441       (3,293,373 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ (3,869,108 )   $ (5,046,571 )
 
           
The statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
                 
    2010     2009  
Net income (loss)
  $ 6,456,611     $ (2,435,132 )
Interest rate swap fair value change
    (258,161 )     (68,073 )
 
           
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 6,198,450     $ (2,503,205 )
 
           

 

15


Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
The statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
                 
    2010     2009  
Net income (loss)
  $ 17,243,436     $ (6,125,939 )
Interest rate swap fair value change
    262,441       (3,293,373 )
 
           
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 17,505,877     $ (9,419,312 )
 
           
10. UNCERTAINTIES IMPACTING THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY AND OUR FUTURE OPERATIONS
The Company has certain risks and uncertainties that it experiences during volatile market conditions, which can have a severe impact on operations. The Company began operations in November 2008. The Company’s revenues are derived from the sale and distribution of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil to customers primarily located in the U.S. Corn for the production process is supplied to the plant primarily from local agricultural producers and from purchases on the open market. Ethanol sales average approximately 85% of total revenues and corn costs average 78% of total cost of goods sold.
The Company’s operating and financial performance is largely driven by prices at which the Company sells ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil, and the related cost of corn. The price of ethanol is influenced by factors such as prices of supply and demand, weather, government policies and programs, and unleaded gasoline and the petroleum markets, although since 2005 the prices of ethanol and gasoline began a divergence with ethanol selling for less than gasoline at the wholesale level. Excess ethanol supply in the market, in particular, puts downward pressure on the price of ethanol. The Company’s largest cost of production is corn. The cost of corn is generally impacted by factors such as supply and demand, weather, government policies and programs. The Company’s risk management program is used to protect against the price volatility of these commodities.
Management has considered expense reductions that can be made in the upcoming months related to reduced labor hours, analysis of vendor costs, efficiency of chemical usage, inventory monitoring for corn, and the possibility of sharing spare part inventories with other ethanol plants. In addition, management is continually evaluating improved technologies to either earn additional revenues or reduce operating costs. Management has entered into a software license agreement to improve production and reduce costs for the upcoming years (Note 8). Management has renegotiated its contract with their ethanol marketer to extend the initial term of the agreement to eight years. To manage cash flow, the Company also has the option to elect to pay an increased commission rate for reduced payment terms from 20 days to 7 days after shipment.

 

16


Table of Contents

Item 2.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We prepared the following discussion and analysis to help you better understand our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, and results of operations for the three and six month period ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and notes and the information contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report contains historical information, as well as forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks and relate to future events, our future financial performance, or our expected future operations and actions. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “future,” “intend,” “could,” “hope,” “predict,” “target,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are only our predictions based upon current information and involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our actual results or actions may differ materially from these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the reasons described in this report. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by us include:
 
Changes in the availability and price of corn and natural gas;
 
 
Our inability to secure credit or obtain additional equity financing we may require in the future to continue our operations;
 
 
Our ability to satisfy the financial covenants contained in our credit agreements with our senior lender;
 
 
Negative impacts that our hedging activities may have on our operations;
 
 
Decreases in the market prices of ethanol and distiller’s grains;
 
 
Ethanol supply exceeding demand; and corresponding ethanol price reductions;
 
 
Changes in the environmental regulations that apply to our plant operations;
 
 
Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;
 
 
Changes in plant production capacity or technical difficulties in operating the plant;
 
 
Changes in general economic conditions or the occurrence of certain events causing an economic impact in the agriculture, oil or automobile industries;
 
 
Lack of transport, storage and blending infrastructure preventing ethanol from reaching high demand markets;
 
 
Changes in federal and/or state laws (including the elimination of any federal and/or state ethanol tax incentives);
 
 
Changes and advances in ethanol production technology;
 
 
Additional ethanol plants built in close proximity to our ethanol facility;
 
 
Competition from alternative fuel additives;
 
 
Changes in interest rates and lending conditions;

 

17


Table of Contents

 
Our ability to generate free cash flow to invest in our business and service our debt;
 
 
Our ability to retain key employees and maintain labor relations;
 
 
Volatile commodity and financial markets; and
 
 
Limitations and restrictions contained in the instruments and agreements governing our indebtedness.
The cautionary statements referred to in this section also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by us or persons acting on our behalf. We undertake no duty to update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we currently expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
Overview
Cardinal Ethanol, LLC is an Indiana limited liability company. It was formed on February 7, 2005 with the name of Indiana Ethanol, LLC. On September 27, 2005, we changed our name to Cardinal Ethanol, LLC. We were formed for the purpose of raising capital to develop, construct, own and operate a 100 million gallon per year ethanol plant in east central Indiana near Union City, Indiana. We began producing ethanol and distillers grains at the plant in November 2008. The ethanol plant processes approximately 36 million bushels of corn per year into 100 million gallons of denatured fuel grade ethanol, 320,000 tons of dried distillers grains with solubles, and corn oil.
Our revenues are derived from the sale of our ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil. We market and sell our products primarily in the continental United States using third party marketers. Murex, N.A., Ltd. markets all of our ethanol. Our distillers grains are marketed by CHS, Inc.
We have entered into an agreement with Pavilion Automatic Process Controllers to optimize our plant and reduce the variability and deviation to different processes within the plant, including water balance, distillation/molecular sieves, fermentation, and dryers.
We recently entered into an Agreement with EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. (“EPCO”) under which EPCO will purchase the carbon dioxide gas produced at our plant. EPCO will lease a portion of Cardinal’s property under a separate written lease agreement, on which it will construct a carbon dioxide liquefaction plant. We will supply to EPCO at the liquefaction plant, carbon dioxide gas meeting certain specifications and at a rate sufficient for EPCO to produce 6.25 tons of liquid carbon dioxide per hour. EPCO will pay Cardinal a price of $5.00 per ton of liquid carbon dioxide shipped out of the liquefaction plant by EPCO.
In May 2010 we entered into a construction agreement with LAH Development, LLC for the construction of a bushel bin storage system for storage of up to 730,245 bushels of corn. Construction of the system is scheduled to begin June 1, 2010 and be completed no later than October 1, 2010. The price of the construction is $1,746,000 subject to change orders. We paid 25% of the contract price, or $436,500 as a down payment on the construction. Pursuant to the agreement, LAH Development will pay Cardinal liquidated damages as set out in the agreement if construction is not completed by October 1, 2010.

 

18


Table of Contents

There have been a number of recent developments in legislation that impacts the ethanol industry. One such development concerns the federal Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS). The ethanol industry is benefited by the RFS which requires that a certain amount of renewable fuels must be used in the United States each year. In February 2010, the EPA issued new regulations governing the RFS. These new regulations have been called RFS2. The most controversial part of RFS2 involves what is commonly referred to as the lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, the EPA adopted rules to determine which renewable fuels provided sufficient reductions in greenhouse gases, compared to conventional gasoline, to qualify under the RFS program. RFS2 establishes a tiered approach, where regular renewable fuels are required to accomplish a 20% greenhouse gas reduction compared to gasoline, advanced biofuels and biomass-based biodiesel must accomplish a 50% reduction in greenhouse gases, and cellulosic biofuels must accomplish a 60% reduction in greenhouse gases. Any fuels that fail to meet this standard cannot be used by fuel blenders to satisfy their obligations under the RFS program. The scientific method of calculating these greenhouse gas reductions has been a contentious issue. Many in the ethanol industry were concerned that corn based ethanol would not meet the 20% greenhouse gas reduction requirement based on certain parts of the environmental impact model that many in the ethanol industry believed was scientifically suspect. However, RFS2 as adopted by the EPA provides that corn-based ethanol from modern ethanol production processes does meet the definition of a renewable fuel under the RFS program. Our ethanol plant was grandfathered into the RFS due to the fact that it was constructed prior to the effective date of the lifecycle greenhouse gas requirement and is not required to prove compliance with the lifecycle greenhouse gas reductions. Further, certain provisions of RFS2 as adopted may disproportionately benefit ethanol produced from sugarcane. This could make sugarcane based ethanol, which is primarily produced in Brazil, more competitive in the United States ethanol market. If this were to occur, it could reduce demand for the ethanol that we produce.
In addition to RFS2 which included greenhouse gas reduction requirements, in 2009, California passed a Low Carbon Fuels Standard (LCFS). The California LCFS requires that renewable fuels used in California must accomplish certain reductions in greenhouse gases which is measured using a lifecycle analysis, similar to RFS2. Management believes that this lifecycle analysis is based on unsound scientific principles that unfairly harms corn based ethanol. Management believes that these new regulations will preclude corn based ethanol from being used in California. California represents a significant ethanol demand market. If we are unable to supply ethanol to California, it could significantly reduce demand for the ethanol we produce. Several lawsuits have been filed challenging the California LCFS.
Ethanol production in the United States is benefited by various tax incentives. The most significant of these tax incentives is the federal Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (VEETC). VEETC provides a volumetric ethanol excise tax credit of 4.5 cents per gallon of ethanol blended with gasoline at a rate of 10%. VEETC is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2010. If this tax credit is not renewed, it likely would have a negative impact on the price of ethanol and demand for ethanol in the marketplace. On December 31, 2009, the part of VEETC that benefits the biodiesel industry was allowed to expire. Recently, Congress passed legislation to reinstate the biodiesel credit until December 31, 2010. However, the bills passed by the House and Senate must be reconciled and the final bill must be signed by the President before the tax credit will be reinstated. If the VEETC that benefits the ethanol industry is allowed to expire, it could negatively impact demand for ethanol and may harm our financial condition.
We expect to fund our operations during the next 12 months using cash flow from our continuing operations and our current credit facilities.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
The following table shows the results of our operations and the percentage of revenues, cost of goods sold, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
Statement of Operations   March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)     March 31, 2009 (Unaudited)  
Data   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
Revenues
  $ 54,805,570       100.00 %   $ 47,664,537       100.00 %
Cost of Goods Sold
  $ 46,194,728       84.29 %   $ 48,309,527       101.35 %
Gross Profit (Loss)
  $ 8,610,842       15.71 %   $ (644,990 )     (1.35 )%
Operating Expenses
  $ 958,083       1.75 %   $ 1,015,606       2.13 %
Operating Income (Loss)
  $ 7,652,759       13.96 %   $ (1,660,596 )     (3.48 )%
Other Expense
  $ (1,196,148 )     (2.18 %)   $ (774,536 )     (1.63 )%
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 6,456,611       11.78 %   $ (2,435,132 )     (5.11 )%

 

19


Table of Contents

Revenues
Our revenues from operations come from three primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil. The following table shows the sources of our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
    March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
Revenue Source   Amount     % of Revenues     Amount     % of Revenues  
Ethanol Sales
  $ 45,694,615       83.38 %   $ 39,928,725       83.77 %
Dried Distillers Grains Sales
    8,684,689       15.85 %     7,484,085       15.70 %
Wet Distillers Grains Sales
    31,903       0.06 %     33,818       0.07 %
Other Revenue
    394,360       0.72 %     217,909       0.46 %
 
                       
Total Revenues
  $ 54,805,570       100.00 %   $ 47,664,537       100.00 %
The following table shows additional data regarding production and price levels for our primary inputs and products for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
                 
    Three Months ended     Three Months ended  
    March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
Production:
               
Ethanol sold (gallons)
    27,886,134       24,810,575  
Distillers grains sold (tons)
    83,776       74,507  
 
               
Revenues:
               
Ethanol average price per gallon
  $ 1.64     $ 1.61  
Distillers grains average price per ton
  $ 99.15     $ 100.90  
 
               
Primary Inputs:
               
Corn ground (bushels)
    10,011,076       8,381,110  
Natural gas purchased (MMBTU)
    819,705       753,062  
 
               
Costs of Primary Inputs:
               
Corn average price per bushel ground
  $ 3.74     $ 4.08  
Natural gas average price per MMBTU
  $ 5.93     $ 5.40  
 
               
Other Costs:
               
Chemical and additive costs per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.055     $ 0.068  
Denaturant cost per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.041     $ 0.029  
Electricity cost per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.029     $ 0.029  
Direct Labor cost per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.017     $ 0.019  
We experienced an increase in the gallons of ethanol sold in the three month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. We sold 27,886,134 gallons of ethanol during the three month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to 24,810,575 for the same three month period ending in 2009. The average price we sold our ethanol at was $1.64 and $1.61 for the three month period ending March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the market price of ethanol varied between approximately $1.47 per gallon and approximately $1.95 per gallon.
We experienced an increase in the amount of distillers grains sold in the three month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. We sold 83,776 and 74,507 tons of distillers grains during the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The average price per ton of distillers grains was $99.15 and $100.90 for the three month period ending March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the market price of distillers grains varied between approximately $85.00 per ton and approximately $119.00 per ton.

 

20


Table of Contents

We experienced an increase in the amount of corn ground during the three month period ending March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the market price of corn varied between approximately $3.40 per bushel and approximately $3.99 per bushel. Our average price per bushel of corn ground was $3.74 for the quarter ended March 13, 2010 compared to $4.08 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the market price of natural gas varied between approximately $4.12 per MMBTU and approximately $6.06 per MMBTU. Our average price per MMBTU of natural gas was $4.42.
We are currently operating at full, or above, nameplate capacity. However, in the event that we decrease our production of ethanol, our production of distillers grains would also decrease accordingly. Such a decrease in our volume of production of ethanol and distillers grains would result in lower revenues. However, if we decreased production, we would require a corresponding decreased quantity of corn and natural gas, thereby lowering our costs of good sold. Therefore, the effect of a decrease in our product volume would be largely dependent on the market prices of the products we produce and the inputs we use to produce our products at the time of such a production decrease. We anticipate operating at less than full capacity only if industry margins become unfavorable or we experience technical difficulties in operating the plant.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we received approximately 83% of our revenue from the sale of fuel ethanol and approximately 16% of our revenue from the sale of distillers grains. Sales of corn oil represented less than 1% of our total sales. Our revenue from ethanol increased slightly during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, as a result of increased production. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we experienced a decreasing trend in the price we received for our ethanol. Ethanol prices peaked in November 2009 and have been decreasing since that time. Management attributes this decreasing trend in ethanol prices with increased production of ethanol and steady demand. Increased gasoline and ethanol prices during the last calendar quarter of 2009 allowed the ethanol industry to realize more favorable margins. Management believes that the increased margins led some idled ethanol plants to again commence production. Unless this increased supply is equally met with increased demand for ethanol, management believes ethanol prices will be pressured downward, which could significantly affect our liquidity.
Management believes that demand for ethanol is being affected by what is known as the blending wall. The blending wall is a theoretical limit where more ethanol cannot be blended into the national gasoline pool. Currently, ethanol is blended with conventional gasoline for use in standard (non-flex fuel) vehicles to create a blend which is 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline. Estimates indicate that approximately 135 billion gallons of gasoline are sold in the United States each year. Assuming that all gasoline in the United States is blended at a rate of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline, the maximum demand for ethanol is 13.5 billion gallons per year. This theoretical limit acts as a cap on ethanol demand which can negatively impact ethanol prices. If ethanol supply continues to expand without a corresponding increase in ethanol demand, management anticipates further decreases in ethanol prices.
Management anticipates that ethanol prices will be relatively stable or may decline during the remainder of our 2010 fiscal year. However, the trend in the price of ethanol is uncertain unless the EPA approves an increase in the amount of ethanol that can be blended with gasoline for use in standard (non-flex fuel) vehicles. The EPA is considering allowing a blend of 15% ethanol and 85% gasoline (called E15) for use in standard vehicles. The EPA has delayed making a decision on E15 until sometime in 2010. If the EPA allows a 15% ethanol blend, it may result in increased ethanol demand which could positively impact ethanol prices. However, the EPA may restrict what vehicles can use E15 which may lead to gasoline retailers refusing to carry E15. Further, the EPA may mandate labeling requirements for the E15 blend which may be unattractive to gasoline consumers and may result in decreased ethanol demand. Automobile manufacturers and environmental groups are lobbying against higher percentage ethanol blends. We expect some seasonality of demand for ethanol that coincides with increased gasoline demand during the summer driving season which may have a positive impact on ethanol prices.

 

21


Table of Contents

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, distillers grains prices trended downward. Management attributes this decreasing price trend in distillers grains with concerns about the quality of distillers grains. Vomitoxin was a significant concern related to corn harvested in the fall of 2009 due to the very wet conditions and late harvest. Vomitoxin from corn used in the ethanol production process remains in the distillers grains which are the co-product of the ethanol production process. If the corn that is used to produce ethanol contains high levels of vomitoxin, it can affect the quality of the distillers grains that are produced and affect the price of distillers grains. We have received favorable pricing for our distillers grains due to our lower levels of vomitoxins. After the end of the three month period ended March 31, 2010, distillers grains prices increased. Management attributes this increase in prices to increased distillers grains demand from China. Management anticipates continued growth in distillers grains demand from China which management believes will have a positive impact on distillers grains prices.
The ethanol plant continues to produce ethanol and distillers grains at a rate that is in excess of our nameplate production capacity of 100 million gallons per year.
Corn oil represents an additional revenue source for us. Our corn oil sales increased in the three month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 as a result of increased production in the three month period ended March 31, 2010. We are currently operating at 60% of the designed capacity of our corn oil extraction equipment. We are working with ICM, Inc. to fine tune the operation of our corn oil extraction equipment and hope to have the equipment operating at 100% capacity in the near term.
Cost of Goods Sold
Our cost of goods sold from the production of ethanol and distillers grains is primarily made up of corn and energy expenses. Our cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was 84.29% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to 101.35% for the same period in 2009. This decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was primarily the result of lower corn prices for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. These lower prices also affected the net unrealized and realized gains and losses from corn derivatives for the three months ended March 31, 2010. We had realized and unrealized gains from corn derivatives of approximately $3,165,000, for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to a net gain of approximately $317,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The effect of the derivative instruments on gross margin, had the Company not entered into these contracts, would be to reduce gross margin from 15.71% to 9.9% at March 31, 2010. The impact on gross margin for the three months ended March 31, 2009 would be to reduce gross margin from (1.35%) to (2.02%).
Corn Costs
USDA reports indicate that the 2009 growing season was the second largest on record behind the 2007 record production. The preliminary estimates by the USDA April 12, 2010 Crop Production report indicate that there is an additional 2.3 million acres of corn planted this year. Competition for corn in our area has increased basis levels. Although we believe there is corn available nationally from a supply and demand standpoint, there is uncertainty over the amount, quantity, or quality of local corn for the plant. The cost of corn is the highest input to the plant and these uncertainties could dramatically affect our expected input cost. During the three month period ended March 31, 2010, corn prices were relatively steady. We expect that corn prices will continue to be relatively steady for the rest of our fiscal year. However, weather conditions or other factors could significantly impact corn prices.
In the ordinary course of business, we entered into forward purchase contracts for our commodity purchases and sales. At March 31, 2010, we have forward corn purchase contracts for various delivery periods through December 2011 for a total commitment of approximately $13,346,000. Approximately $2,055,000 of the forward corn purchases were with a related party. As of March 31, 2010 we also have open short positions for 3,615,000 bushels of corn and long positions for 1,135,000 bushels of corn on the Chicago Board of Trade to hedge our forward corn contracts and corn inventory. Our corn derivatives are forecasted to settle through December 2011.
We expect continued volatility in the price of corn, which could significantly impact our cost of goods sold. The growing number of operating ethanol plants nationwide is also expected to increase the demand for corn. This increase will likely drive the price of corn upwards in our market which will impact our ability to operate profitably.

 

22


Table of Contents

Natural Gas Costs
Prices for natural gas have increased during the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as a result of premium pricing experienced during the winter months. Management anticipates that natural gas prices will remain relatively steady into the summer months unless we experience a catastrophic weather event that would cause problems related to the supply of natural gas. Should the economy continue to improve, we believe that increased industrial production may result in increased energy demand, including increased natural gas demand. This may result in further increases in natural gas prices. This may be offset somewhat by the normal seasonal decline of natural gas demand during summer months.
Operating Expense
Our operating expenses as a percentage of revenues were 1.75% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2.13% in the same period of 2009. Operating expenses include salaries and benefits of administrative employees, insurance, taxes, professional fees and other general administrative costs. We experienced a decrease in actual operating expenses of approximately $57,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Our efforts to optimize efficiencies and maximize production may result in a decrease in our operating expenses on a per gallon basis. However, because these expenses generally do not vary with the level of production at the plant, we expect our operating expenses to remain steady throughout the remainder of the 2010 fiscal year.
Operating Income
Our income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately 13.96% of our revenues compared to an operating loss of 3.48% for the same period in 2009. The increase in our operating income for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 was primarily the net result of our revenues exceeding our costs of goods sold and our operating expenses.
Other Expense
Our other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 2.18% of our revenues compared to other expense of 1.63% of revenues for the same period in 2009. Our other expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted primarily of interest expense.
Additional Information
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
The following table shows the results of our operations and the approximate percentage of revenues, costs of goods sold, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our unaudited statements of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009:
                                 
    Six Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
Statement of Operations   March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)     March 31, 2009 (Unaudited)  
Data   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
Revenues
  $ 118,355,441       100.00 %   $ 71,686,402       100.00 %
Cost of Goods Sold
  $ 96,793,063       81.78 %   $ 74,737,350       104.26 %
Gross Profit (Loss)
  $ 21,562,378       18.22 %   $ (3,050,948 )     (4.26 )%
Operating Expenses
  $ 1,861,936       1.57 %   $ 1,611,979       2.25 %
Operating Income (Loss)
  $ 19,700,442       16.65 %   $ (4,662,927 )     (6.51 )%
Other Income (Expense)
  $ (2,457,006 )     (2.08 )%   $ (1,463,012 )     (2.04 )%
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 17,243,436       14.57 %   $ (6,125,939 )     (8.55 )%

 

23


Table of Contents

Revenues
Our revenues from operations come from two primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol and sales of distillers grains. However, during the six months ended March 31, 2010, we also had revenue from the sale of corn oil. In addition, we only had 5 months of operations in the six months ended March 31, 2009 as we did not begin operations until November 2008.
The following table shows the sources of our revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
                                 
    Six Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
Revenue Source   Amount     % of Revenues     Amount     % of Revenues  
Ethanol Sales
  $ 100,668,434       85.06     $ 59,283,890       82.70  
Dried Distillers Grains Sales
  $ 16,361,378       13.82     $ 12,063,374       16.83  
Wet Distillers Grains Sales
  $ 68,912       0.06     $ 75,769       0.10  
Other Revenue
  $ 1,256,717       1.06     $ 263,369       0.37  
Total Revenues
  $ 118,355,441       100.00     $ 71,686,402       100.00  
The following table shows additional data regarding production and price levels for our primary inputs and products for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
                 
    Six Months ended     Six Months ended  
    March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
Production:
               
Ethanol sold (gallons)
    56,137,281       38,162,230  
Distillers grains sold (tons)
    166,481       114,838  
 
               
Revenues:
               
Ethanol average price per gallon
  $ 1.79     $ 1.55  
Distillers grains average price per ton
  $ 98.69     $ 105.71  
 
               
Primary Inputs:
               
Corn ground (bushels)
    20,270,512       14,477,456  
Natural gas purchased (MMBTU)
    1,653,182       1,241,239  
 
               
Costs of Primary Inputs:
               
Corn average price per bushel ground
  $ 3.82     $ 4.09  
Natural gas average price per MMBTU
  $ 5.27     $ 6.05  
 
               
Other Costs:
               
Chemical and additive costs per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.059     $ 0.074  
Denaturant cost per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.043     $ 0.036  
Electricity cost per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.030     $ 0.030  
Direct Labor cost per gallon of ethanol sold
  $ 0.018     $ 0.028  
In the six month period ended March 31, 2010, ethanol sales comprised approximately 85% of our revenues and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 14% percent of our revenues, while corn oil sales comprised approximately 1% of our revenues. For the six month period ended March 31, 2009, ethanol sales comprised approximately 83% of our revenue, without accounting for ethanol hedging, and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 17% of our revenue.

 

24


Table of Contents

The average ethanol sales price we received for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 was approximately 15% higher than our average ethanol sales price for the comparable 2009 period. Management attributes this increase in ethanol prices with enhanced demand from oil companies due to the increased price spread between gasoling and ethanol. Management is somewhat uncertain about the trend in the price of ethanol during the second half of our fiscal year. The uncertainty surrounding the extent to which the EPA will allow increased amounts of ethanol to be blended with gasoline may only be partially offset by the usual increase in demand during the summer driving season.
The price we received for our dried distillers grains decreased by approximately 7% during the six month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period of 2009. This decrease is due to high vomitoxin levels in 2009. After March 31, 2010, our dried distillers grains prices have been increasing. Management attributes this increase in the price of our dried distillers grains to an increase in exportation of distillers grains to China. We anticipate that the market price of distillers grains will continue to be volatile as a result of changes in the price of corn and competing animal feed substitutes such as soybean meal as well as volatility in distillers grains supplies related to changes in ethanol production.
Cost of Goods Sold
Our costs of goods sold as a percentage of revenues were approximately 81.78% for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to 103.26% for the same period of 2009. Our two largest costs of production are corn (78% of cost of goods sold for our six months ended March 31, 2010) and natural gas (0.09% of cost of goods sold for our six months ended March 31, 2010). Our cost of goods sold increased by approximately $22,056,000 in the six months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2009, while our revenue for the same period increased by approximately $46,669,000. These lower prices also affected the net unrealized and realized gains and losses from corn derivatives for the six months ended March 31, 2010. We had realized and unrealized gains from corn derivatives of approximately $2,255,000, for the six months ended March 31, 2010, compared to a net gain of approximately $625,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2009. The effect of the derivative instruments on gross margin, had the Company not entered into these contracts, would be to reduce gross margin from 18.22% to 16.31% for the six months ended March 31, 2010. The impact on gross margin for the six months ended March 31, 2009 would be to reduce gross margin from (4.26%) to (5.13%).
Operating Expense
Our operating expenses were slightly higher for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 than they were for the same period ended March 31, 2009. This increase in operating expenses is primarily due to increased depreciation and from increased accounting fees resulting from the lack of an internal Chief Financial Officer until February 2010. We expect that going forward our operating expenses will remain relatively steady.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our income from operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately 16.65% of our revenues compared to an operating loss of approximately 6.51% of our revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2009. This increase in our profitability is primarily due to an increase in the price of ethanol and the corresponding increase in our operating margins.
Other Income and Other Expense
Other expense for the six months ended March 31, 2010, was approximately 2.08% of our revenue and totaled approximately $2,457,000. Other expense for the six months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately 2.04% of our revenue and totaled approximately $1,463,000. Other expense consisted primarily of interest expense.

 

25


Table of Contents

Changes in Financial Condition for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
The following table highlights the changes in our financial condition:
                 
    March 31, 2010     September 30, 2009  
Current Assets
  $ 30,015,777     $ 22,049,914  
Current Liabilities
  $ 16,485,848     $ 13,036,275  
Members’ Equity
  $ 83,224,514     $ 66,594,997  
We experienced an increase in our current assets at March 31, 2010 compared to our fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. We experienced an increase of approximately $454,000 in the value of our inventory at March 31, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009. Additionally, current assets increased at March 31, 2010 due to increased trade accounts receivable. At March 31, 2010, we had trade accounts receivable of approximately $14,777,000 compared to trade accounts receivable at September 30, 2009 of approximately $5,945,000. Increase in receivables is primarily due to ethanol that was loaded and shipped on March 31, 2010 and not yet paid of approximately $13,573,444. This is also reflects the change in payment terms with our ethanol customer from seven to twenty one days. We also had asset derivative instruments of approximately $772,000 at March 31, 2010, compared to asset derivative instruments of approximately $135,000 at September 30, 2009. Prepaid and other current assets increased to approximately $1,080,000 at March 31, 2010, compared to approximately $847,000 at September 30, 2009. The increase in prepaid and other current assets is primarily due to prepaid natural gas.
We experienced an increase in our total current liabilities at March 31, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009. We experienced an increase of approximately $2,203,000 in accounts payable for corn purchases at March 31, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009. The increase in corn payables is due to quantity of corn bushels in accounts payable as well as an increase on average of approximately $0.01/bushel.
We experienced a decrease in our long-term liabilities as of March 31, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009. At March 31, 2010, we had approximately $62,441,000 outstanding in the form of long-term loans, compared to approximately $77,427,000 at September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily due to the pay off of our long term revolving note during December 2009 of $9,250,000, as well as scheduled principal repayments made when the notes converted to term loans in April 2009. We also paid $1,000,000 required by our primary lender in return for concessions they made that increased the allowable capital expenditures for the current fiscal year. Under the agreement, another $1,000,000 will be required in the third fiscal quarter. Prior to the conversion of the notes, we were in construction phase, and therefore had no required principal payments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Based on financial forecasts performed by our management, we anticipate that we will have sufficient cash from our current credit facilities and cash from our operations to continue to operate the ethanol plant for the next 12 months. We do not anticipate seeking additional equity or debt financing during our 2010 fiscal year. However, should we experience unfavorable operating conditions in the future, we may have to secure additional debt or equity sources for working capital or other purposes.
As a result of current conditions in the ethanol market that have presented more favorable operating conditions than we experienced during the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year, we were able to reduce our reliance on our revolving lines of credit. This has allowed us greater liquidity and has increased the amount of funds that are available to us on our revolving line of credit. However, should we once again experience unfavorable operating conditions in the ethanol industry that prevent us from profitably operating the ethanol plant, we could have difficulty maintaining our liquidity.
The following table shows cash flows for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
                 
    2010     2009  
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
  $ 14,462,322       (17,980,424 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
  $ (840,052 )     (12,846,947 )
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
  $ (15,096,643 )     30,380,055  
Net decrease in cash
  $ (1,474,373 )     (447,316 )
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 5,790,752       14,219  

 

26


Table of Contents

Cash Flow from Operations
We experienced a significant increase in our net cash provided by operations. Cash provided by operating activities was approximately $14,462,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to approximately $17,980,000 used in operating activities for the six months ended March 31, 2009. Our net income from operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $17,243,000 as compared to a net loss of approximately $6,126,000 for the same period in 2009.
Cash Flow From Investing Activities
We experienced a significant decrease in cash used in investing activities for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Cash used in investing activities was approximately $840,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to approximately $12,847,000 for the same period in 2009. As the plant construction was completed, we had payments for construction in process of approximately $12,482,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2009.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
We had a significant increase in cash used for financing activities for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Cash used for financing activities was approximately $15,097,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2010. Approximately $14,216,000 of this cash flow is payments on our long term debt. For the six month period ended March 31, 2009, we received cash of approximately $30,380,000 from financing activities.
Our liquidity, results of operations and financial performance will be impacted by many variables, including the market price for commodities such as, but not limited to, corn, ethanol and other energy commodities, as well as the market price for any co-products generated by the facility and the cost of labor and other operating costs. Assuming future relative price levels for corn, ethanol and distillers grains remain consistent with the relative price levels as of February 1, 2010 we expect operations to generate adequate cash flows to maintain operations. This expectation assumes that we will be able to sell all the ethanol that is produced at the plant.
Short and Long Term Debt Sources
On December 19, 2006, we entered into a loan agreement with First National Bank of Omaha establishing a senior credit facility for the construction of our plant. The credit facility was in the amount of $96,000,000, consisting of an $83,000,000 construction note, a $10,000,000 revolving line of credit and a $3,000,000 letter of credit. We also entered into an interest rate swap agreement for $41,500,000 of the construction term loan in order to achieve a fixed rate on a portion of this loan.
In April 2009, the construction loan was converted into multiple term loans one of which was a $41,500,000 Fixed Rate Note, which will be applicable to the interest rate swap agreement, a $31,500,000 Variable Rate Note, and a $10,000,000 Long Term Revolving Note. The term loans have a maturity of five years with a ten-year amortization.
Line of Credit
In February 2010, we extended and amended the $10,000,000 revolving line of credit to expire in February 2011 and changed the interest rate charged on the short-term revolving line of credit to the greater of the three month LIBOR rate plus 400 basis points or 5%. The spread on the three month LIBOR rate will adjust down based on the Company meeting certain debt to net worth ratios, measured quarterly. Prior to this amendment, interest on the revolving line of credit was charged at the greater of the 1-month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points or 5%. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings on the revolving line of credit.
Fixed Rate Note
As indicated above, we have an interest rate swap agreement in connection with the Fixed Rate Note payable to our senior lender. This interest rate swap helps protect our exposure to increases in interest rates and the swap effectively fixes the rate on the loan at 8.11% until April 2014. As of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 we had an interest rate swap with a fair value of approximately $3,869,000 and $4,132,000, respectively, recorded in current and long term liabilities.

 

27


Table of Contents

The Fixed Rate Note will accrue interest at a rate equal to the three month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points. We began repaying principal on the Fixed Rate Note beginning in July 2009. The outstanding balance on this note was approximately $39,436,000 and $40,817,000 at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and is included in current liabilities and long-term debt.
Variable Rate Note and Long Term Revolving Note
We are required to make quarterly payments of $1,546,162 to be applied first to accrued interest on the long term revolving note, then to accrued interest on the variable rate note and finally to principal on the variable rate note. These payments began in July 2009 and continue through April 2014. In regards to the amendment in February 2010, the Company made a mandatory excess cash flow payment of $1,000,000 in February 2010 that was applied to the principal of the variable rate note. The maximum availability on the long term revolving note is reduced by $250,000 each quarter. Interest on the variable rate note accrues at the greater of the three month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points or 5%. At March 31, 2010, the interest rate was 5%. The spread over the three month LIBOR rate shall adjust down based on the Company meeting certain debt to net worth ratios, measured quarterly. Interest on the long term revolving note accrues at the greater of the one month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points or 5%. At March 31, 2010, the interest rate was 5%. The spread over the three month LIBOR rate shall adjust down based on our compliance with certain debt to net worth ratios, measured quarterly. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the balance on the variable rate note was approximately $27,823,000 and $30,728,000, respectively. At September 30, 2009 the balance on the long term revolving loan was $9,750,000. At March 31, 2010 there were no outstanding borrowings on the long term revolving note, as we repaid the long term revolving note in full.
Corn Oil Extraction Note
Effective July 31, 2008, we amended our construction loan agreement to include a new loan up to the maximum amount of $3,600,000 for the purchase and installation of a corn oil extraction system and related equipment. On April 8, 2009, the corn oil extraction note converted into a Corn Oil Extraction Term Note, which accrues interest at a rate equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 300 basis points, or 5%, whichever is greater. The principal amount of the Corn Oil Extraction Term Note is payable in equal quarterly installments of $90,000, plus accrued interest, which we began paying in July 2009. As of March 31, 2010, we had $3,330,000 outstanding on our corn oil extraction loan. At September 30, 2009, we had $3,510,000 outstanding on the corn oil extraction loan.
Letter of Credit
We had one letter of credit outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 for $450,000, which was issued in August 2009 to replace our electrical services security deposit.
Covenants
The loans are secured by our assets and material contracts. In addition, during the term of the loans, we will be subject to certain financial covenants consisting of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum net worth, and minimum working capital. We are required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.25:1.0 for all periods after April 8, 2009. For the first fiscal quarter after April 8, 2009 our fixed charge coverage ratio is measured on a rolling one quarter basis, for the second fiscal quarter after April 8, 2009 our fixed charge coverage ratio is measured on a rolling two quarter basis, and for the third fiscal quarter after April 8, 2009 our fixed charge coverage ratio is measured on a rolling three quarter basis. Thereafter, our fixed charge coverage ratio will be measured on a rolling four quarter basis. Our fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated by comparing our “adjusted” EBITDA, meaning EBITDA less taxes, capital expenditures and allowable distributions, to our scheduled payments of the principal and interest on our obligations to our lender, other than principal repaid on our revolving loan and long term revolving note.

 

28


Table of Contents

We are also required to maintain a minimum net worth of $65,000,000, measured annually at the end of each fiscal year. In subsequent years, our minimum net worth requirement will increase by the greater of $500,000 or the amount of undistributed earnings accumulated during the prior fiscal year.
We are also required to maintain a minimum amount of working capital, which is calculated as our current assets plus the amount available for drawing under our long term revolving note, less current liabilities. Beginning August 1, 2009 through November 30, 2009, our minimum working capital must be $4,000,000. Beginning December 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010, our minimum working capital must be $7,000,000. After May 1, 2010, our minimum working capital must be $10,000,000.
Our loan agreement requires us to obtain prior approval from our lender before making, or committing to make, capital expenditures in an aggregate amount exceeding $1,000,000 in any single fiscal year. In connection with the amendment done in February 2010, the bank increased the fiscal 2010 capital expenditure limit to $4,523,000. For fiscal year 2011 the capital expenditure amount will go back to $1,000,000. We may make distributions to our members to cover their respective tax liabilities. In addition, we may also distribute up to 70% of net income provided we maintain certain leverage ratios and are in compliance with all financial ratio requirements and loan covenants before and after any such distributions are made to our members.
We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2010 and we anticipate that we will continue to meet these covenants through April 1, 2011.
We have working capital of approximately $13,530,000, excluding additional amounts available under our long term revolving note at March 31, 2010. Working Capital as defined by our loan agreement was approximately $23,923,000 at March 31, 2010. This includes the additional amounts available under our long term revolving note and the current portion of the interest rate swap. We anticipate that our current margins will be sufficient to generate enough cash flow to maintain operations, service our debt and comply with our financial covenants in our loan agreements. However, significant uncertainties in the market continue to exist. Due to current commodity markets, we may produce at negative margins and therefore, we will continue to evaluate our liquidity needs for the upcoming months.
We will continue to work with our lenders to try to ensure that the agreements and terms of the loan agreements are met going forward. However, we cannot provide any assurance that our actions will result in sustained profitable operations or that we will not be in violation of our loan covenants or in default on our principal payments. Presently, we are meeting our liquidity needs and complying with our financial covenants and the other terms of our loan agreements. Should market conditions change radically, and we violate the terms or covenants of our loan or fail to obtain a waiver of any such term or covenant, our primary lender could deem us in default of our loans and require us to immediately repay a significant portion or possibly the entire outstanding balance of our loans. Our lender could also elect to proceed with a foreclosure action on our plant.
Tax Abatement
In October 2006, the real estate that our plant was constructed on was determined to be an economic revitalization area, which qualified us for tax abatement. The abatement period is for a ten year term, with an effective date beginning calendar year end 2009 for the property taxes payable in calendar year 2010. The program allows for 100% abatement of property taxes beginning in year 1, and then decreases on a ratable scale so that in year 11 the full amount of property taxes are due and payable. We must apply annually and meet specified criteria to qualify for the abatement program.
Subsequent Events
None.

 

29


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates
We enter into derivative instruments to hedge the variability of expected future cash flows related to interest rates. We do not typically enter into derivative instruments other than for hedging purposes. All derivative instruments are recognized on the March 31, 2010 balance sheet at their fair market value. Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument that is designated as and meets all of the required criteria for a cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged items affect earnings.
At March 31, 2010, we had an interest rate swap with a fair value of $3,869,108 recorded in current and long term liabilities on the balance sheet. The interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge. As of March 31, 2010, we have open short positions for 3,615,000 bushels of corn and long positions for 1,135,000 bushels of corn on the Chicago Board of Trade to hedge our forward corn contracts and corn inventory. These derivatives have not been designated as an effective hedge for accounting purposes. Corn derivatives are forecasted to settle through December 2011. There may be offsetting positions that are not shown on a net basis that could lower the notional amount of positions outstanding as disclosed above.
Management uses various estimates and assumptions in preparing our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Accounting estimates that are the most important to the presentation of our results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgment by management, are designated as our critical accounting estimates. We have the following critical accounting estimates:
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Impairment testing for assets requires various estimates and assumptions, including an allocation of cash flows to those assets and, if required, an estimate of the fair value of those assets. Given the significant assumptions required and the possibility that actual conditions will differ, we consider the assessment of the useful lives of property and equipment to be a critical accounting estimate.
We value our inventory at the lower of cost or market. Our estimates are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. These valuations require the use of management’s assumptions which do not reflect unanticipated events and circumstances that may occur. In our analysis, we consider future corn costs and ethanol prices, break-even points for our plant and our risk management strategies in place through our derivative instruments and forward contracts. Given the significant assumptions required and the possibility that actual conditions will differ, we consider the valuation of the lower of cost or market on inventory to be a critical accounting estimate.
We enter forward contracts for corn purchases to supply the plant. These contracts represent firm purchase commitments which must be evaluated for potential losses. At March 31, 2010, none of these contracts have potential losses. Our estimates include various assumptions including the future prices of ethanol, distillers grains and corn.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3.  
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations associated with interest rates and commodity prices as discussed below. We have no exposure to foreign currency risk as all of our business is conducted in U.S. Dollars. We use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk. We use cash, futures and option contracts to hedge changes to the commodity prices of corn and natural gas. We do not enter into these derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do we designate these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. We used derivative financial instruments to alter our exposure to interest rate risk. We entered into an interest rate swap agreement that we designated as a cash flow hedge.

 

30


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Exposure to interest rate risk results primarily from holding a revolving line of credit and a term loan which bear variable interest rates. Specifically, we have approximately $31 million outstanding in variable rate, long-term debt as of March 31, 2010. Our interest rate on our variable rate, long-term debt has a minimum interest rate of 5%. Currently, our interest rate on our variable rate, long-term debt is at 5%.
Below is a sensitivity analysis we prepared regarding our income exposure to changes in interest rates. The sensitivity analysis below shows the anticipated effect on our income from a 10% adverse change in interest rates for a one year period.
                         
Outstanding Variable Rate   Interest Rate at     Adverse 10% change in     Annual Adverse change to  
Debt at March 31, 2010   March 31, 2010     Interest Rates     Income  
$31,000,000
  5.0%   0.5%   $165,000
In addition, we hold a revolving line of credit which bears a variable interest rate. At March 31, 2010, we have no outstanding borrowings on our revolving line of credit. However, we may borrow on this line of credit at any time which would expose us to interest rate market risk. The specifics of each note are discussed in greater detail in “ Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources .”
We manage our floating rate debt using an interest rate swap. We entered into a fixed rate swap to alter our exposure to the impact of changing interest rates on our results of operations and future cash outflows for interest. We use interest rate swap contracts to separate interest rate risk management from the debt funding decision. The interest rate swaps held by us as of March 31, 2010 qualified as a cash flow hedge. For this qualifying hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value is recognized through earnings when the underlying transaction being hedged affects earnings, allowing a derivative’s gains and losses to offset related results from the hedged item on the income statement. As of March 31, 2010 our interest rate swap had a fair value of approximately $3,869,000.
Commodity Price Risk
We seek to minimize the risks from fluctuations in the prices of raw material inputs, such as corn and natural gas, and finished products, such as ethanol and distiller’s grains, through the use of hedging instruments. In practice, as markets move, we actively manage our risk and adjust hedging strategies as appropriate. Although we believe our hedge positions accomplish an economic hedge against our future purchases and sales, management has chosen not to use hedge accounting, which would match the gain or loss on our hedge positions to the specific commodity purchase being hedged. We are using fair value accounting for our hedge positions, which means as the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the realized or unrealized gains and losses are immediately recognized in our cost of goods sold or as an offset to revenues. The immediate recognition of hedging gains and losses under fair value accounting can cause net income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in value of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged.
As corn prices move in reaction to market trends and information, our income statement will be affected depending on the impact such market movements have on the value of our derivative instruments. Depending on market movements, crop prospects and weather, these price protection positions may cause immediate adverse effects, but are expected to produce long-term positive growth for us. As of March 31, 2010, we had price protection in place for approximately 8% of our anticipated corn needs for the next 12 months. In addition, we had price protection in place for approximately 4% of our natural gas needs for the next 12 months.

 

31


Table of Contents

A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to estimate our exposure to ethanol, corn and natural gas price risk. Market risk related to these factors is estimated as the potential change in income resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the average cost of our corn and natural gas prices and average ethanol price as of March 31, 2010, net of the forward and future contracts used to hedge our market risk for corn and natural gas usage requirements. The volumes are based on our expected use and sale of these commodities for a one year period from March 31, 2010. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are approximately as follows:
                                 
    Estimated Volume             Hypothetical        
    Requirements for the next 12             Adverse Change in     Approximate  
    months (net of forward and             Price as of     Adverse Change to  
    futures contracts)     Unit of Measure     1/31/2010     Income  
Natural Gas
    2,700,000     MMBTU     10 %   $ 1,209,000  
Ethanol
    107,000,000     Gallons     10 %   $ 16,478,000  
Corn
    34,900,000     Bushels     10 %   $ 12,040,500  
Liability Risk
We participate in a captive reinsurance company (the “Captive”). The Captive reinsures losses related to worker’s compensation, commercial property and general liability. Premiums are accrued by a charge to income for the period to which the premium relates and is remitted by our insurer to the captive reinsurer. The Captive reinsures catastrophic losses in excess of a predetermined amount. Our premiums are structured such that we have made a prepaid collateral deposit estimated for losses related to the above coverage. The Captive insurer has estimated and collected an amount in excess of the estimated losses but less than the catastrophic loss limit insured by the Captive. We cannot be assessed in excess of the amount in the collateral fund.
Item 4T.  
Controls and Procedures.
Our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, Jeff Painter, along with our Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, William Dartt, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a — 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2010. Based upon this review and evaluation, these officers have concluded that during the period covered by this report, such disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP standards. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting referenced below.
As evaluated and reported in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K as of September 30, 2009, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer had identified the following specific material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes:
Reconciliation of Significant Accounts — currently a documented reconciliation of the trial balance including the balance sheet and other significant accounts are not being conducted by management. The reconciliations must be conducted, evidenced, and reviewed prior to closing out the quarters and reporting financial statements. Failure to reconcile our significant accounts amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.
Review and Approval of Top Sided Accounting Entries to the General Ledger — currently there is no documented evidence of a review and approval of routine or non-routine adjusting journal entries within the accounting system by the appropriate level of management. The lack of review and approval amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.
Financial Reporting Segregation of Duties — Currently there is a pervasive issue regarding a general lack of segregation of duties. Requisite segregation of duties is not clearly defined or established throughout the financial reporting related business processes. The lack of segregation of duties amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, have reviewed and evaluated any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred as of March 31, 2010. Our management is in the process of addressing the above material weaknesses and, since the termination of our former Chief Financial Officer in June 2009, utilized the services of an outside accounting firm to assist with this process. In March 2010, William Dartt was appointed as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer. We believe this will help remediate the material weaknesses by focusing additional attention and resources in our internal accounting functions. However, the material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.

 

32


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.  
Legal Proceedings
On June 27, 2008, Cardinal Ethanol, LLC (“Cardinal”) and ICM, Inc. entered into a Tricanter Purchase and Installation Agreement under which ICM, Inc. constructed and installed a Tricanter Oil Separation System at Cardinal’s ethanol plant. On February 12, 2010, GS Cleantech Corporation filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, claiming that Cardinal’s operation of the oil recovery system manufactured and installed by ICM, Inc. infringes a patent claimed by GS CleanTech and seeking damages associated with that infringement. On February 16, 2010, Cardinal entered into an Amendment to Tricanter Purchase and installation Agreement with ICM, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the Amendment, ICM, Inc. will indemnify Cardinal from and against all claims, demands, liabilities, actions, litigations, losses, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees arising out of any claim of infringement of patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights by reason of Cardinal’s purchase and use of the Tricanter Oil Separation System. In addition, ICM, Inc. has agreed to defend Cardinal, at ICM’s expense in the lawsuit filed by GS Cleantech Corporation.
Item 1A.  
Risk Factors.
You should carefully read and consider the risks and uncertainties below and the other information contained in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we may face. The following risks, together with additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial could impair our financial condition and results of operation.
Risks Relating to Our Business
If the Federal Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (“VEETC”) expires on December 31, 2010, it could negatively impact our profitability . The ethanol industry is benefited by VEETC which is a federal excise tax credit of 45 cents per gallon of ethanol blended with gasoline at a rate of at least 10%. This excise tax credit is set to expire on December 31, 2010. We believe that VEETC positively impacts the price of ethanol. On December 31, 2009, the portion of VEETC that benefits the biodiesel industry was allowed to expire. This resulted in the biodiesel industry ceasing to produce biodiesel because the price of biodiesel without the tax credit was uncompetitive with the cost of petroleum based diesel. If the portion of VEETC that benefits ethanol is allowed to expire, it could negatively impact the price we receive for our ethanol and could negatively impact our profitability.
Item 2.  
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3.  
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.  
[Removed and Reserved]
Item 5.  
Other Information
Distributions
Our board of directors approved an estimated tax distribution of $60 per unit net of non-resident withholding taxes for out of state members, for a total distribution of approximately $842,000, which was made in March 2010.

 

33


Table of Contents

Results of 2010 Annual Members’ Meeting
On February 11, 2010, the Registrant held its annual members’ meeting to vote on the election of two directors whose terms were scheduled to expire in 2010. There were only two nominees to fill the two positions, Troy Prescott and Thomas Chalfant were elected by a plurality vote of the members eligible to vote to serve a term which will expire in 2013. The votes for the newly elected directors were as follows:
                 
Directors Elected to Serve until 2013   For     Withheld/Abstain  
Troy Prescott
    4,156       989  
Thomas Chalfant
    5,082       63  
Item 6.  
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of, or are incorporated by reference into, this report:
             
Exhibit
No.
  Description   Method of
Filing
       
 
   
  10.1    
Amendment to Tricanter Purchase and Installation Agreement between ICM, Inc. and Cardinal Ethanol, LLC dated February 16, 2010.
  *
       
 
   
  10.2    
Carbon Dioxide Purchase and Sale Agreement between EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. and Cardinal Ethanol, LLC dated March 8, 2010.
  *
       
 
   
  10.3    
Construction Agreement between LAH Development, LLC and Cardinal Ethanol, LLC dated May 11, 2010.
  *
       
 
   
  31.1    
Certificate pursuant to 17 CFR 240 13a-14(a)
  *
       
 
   
  31.2    
Certificate pursuant to 17 CFR 240 13a-14(a)
  *
       
 
   
  32.1    
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  *
       
 
   
  32.2    
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  *
 
     
(*)  
Filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
 
 
Date: May 14, 2010  /s/ Jeff Painter    
  Jeff Painter   
  Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)   
 
Date: May 14, 2010  /s/ William Dartt    
  William Dartt   
  Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 
 

 

34

Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT TO TRICANTER PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO TRICANTER PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into on this 16 th day of February, 2010, by and between ICM, Inc., a Kansas corporation (“Seller”) and Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (“Buyer”).
WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller are parties to that certain Tricanter Purchase and Installation Agreement dated June 27, 2008 (the “Agreement”);
WHEREAS, GS Cleantech Corporation filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, captioned GS Cleantech Corporation v. Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, Case No.: 1:10-CV-0180 LIM-DML (the “Lawsuit”)
WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller desire to amend the Agreement, as amended, as specifically provided for herein.
IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual promises, covenants, agreements and payments set forth herein and in the Agreement, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Seller and Buyer agree as follows:
  1.  
Unless otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.
  2.  
A new Paragraph 11 is hereby added to the Agreement which shall state as follows:
“Indemnification. Seller agrees to indemnify and hold Buyer harmless from and against all claims, demands, liabilities, actions, litigations, losses, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of the infringement of adversely owned patents, copyrights or any other intellectual property rights by reason of Buyer’s purchase and use of the Equipment. The foregoing indemnification includes providing the defense of the Lawsuit on behalf of Cardinal by counsel of ICM’s choosing. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller will not be responsible for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees incurred by Buyer to defend any such matter on its own; to engage counsel to monitor ICM’s defense of the Lawsuit, or to seek advice on how to respond to any other demands or suits. If the Equipment or its use infringes or violates an adverse intellectual property right of any person or entity, Seller shall take all commercially reasonable steps to (i) obtain a license to permit Buyer to continue using the Equipment, or (ii) provide engineering or modification to the Equipment so that it will not infringe the adverse intellectual property rights to enable Buyer to continue to use the Equipment.”

 


 

  3.  
Except as specifically amended hereby, Buyer and Seller hereby ratify the terms and conditions of the Agreement as if restated herein.
  4.  
This Amendment and the Agreement, as amended, represent the entire understanding between the parties in relation to the subject matter hereof, and supersede any and all previous agreements, arrangements or discussions between the parties (whether written or oral) in respect to the subject matter hereof.
IN WITNESS OF the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties have caused their authorized representatives to execute this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.
                     
SELLER:       BUYER:    
 
                   
ICM, Inc.       Cardinal Ethanol, LLC    
 
                   
By:
  /s/ Dave VanderGriend
 
Its: CEO
      By:   /s/ Jeffrey L. Painter
 
Its: President/CEO
   

 

Page 2 of 2

Exhibit 10.2
CARBON DIOXIDE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
THIS CARBON DIOXIDE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made this 8th day of March 2010, between Cardinal Ethanol (“Cardinal Ethanol”) and EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. (“EPCO”). Cardinal Ethanol and EPCO may collectively be referred to herein as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party”).
WHEREAS, Cardinal Ethanol operates an ethanol production facility in Union City, Indiana which produces as a by-product raw carbon dioxide in gaseous form; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Parties that Cardinal Ethanol provide CO 2 Gas from the Cardinal Ethanol Plant for use by EPCO in the EPCO Plant and EPCO purchase CO 2 Gas on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing premises, the mutual covenants set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows, superceding all prior agreements:
  1.  
Definitions:
  (a)  
Cardinal Ethanol Plant — The ethanol production facility and related operations constructed on the premises of Cardinal Ethanol in Union City, Indiana which will produce as a by-product quantities of CO 2 Gas.
  (b)  
CO 2 Gas — means the raw carbon dioxide gas produced as a byproduct of the Cardinal Ethanol Plant and provided to the EPCO Plant for production of Liquid CO 2 .
  (c)  
Contract Year — Shall mean each twelve (12) month period during the term hereof beginning on the first day of the first month after the EPCO Plant begins producing Liquid CO 2 .
  (d)  
EPCO Plant — The carbon dioxide liquefaction plant to be constructed by EPCO on the leased premises and any future expansion of the CO2 plant.
  (e)  
Flow Rate — The rate of flow of CO 2 Gas from the Cardinal Ethanol Plant to the Matchpoint.
  (f)  
Liquid CO 2 — means the finished purified, liquefied product produced by EPCO from the CO 2 Gas supplied by Cardinal Ethanol.
  (g)  
Matchpoint — The flange or other point on the necessary services and process facility conduits into and out of the EPCO Plant site and shown on Attachment 1 of Exhibit B . The Matchpoint shall be located in a mutually agreed upon location as near as practical to the boundary of the leased premises.

 

 


 

  (h)  
Shipped Tons — means those short tons of Liquid CO 2 shipped out of the EPCO Plant by weight. Shipped Tons shall be determined by certified truck or rail scales located on the EPCO Plant site and EPCO’s bills of lading which will be provided to Cardinal Ethanol on a daily basis and, upon request by Cardinal Ethanol, in a monthly cumulative report.
  (i)  
Specifications — means the minimum (or maximum as the case may be) acceptable specifications for the make up and contents of the CO 2 Gas as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.
  2.  
Term :
  (a)  
The initial term of this Agreement shall be for ten (10) years effective on the startup date of the EPCO Plant which date shall be no later than June 1, 2010 unless otherwise agreed by the Parties. This Agreement shall automatically renew for two (2) additional five (5) year periods thereafter unless either Party terminates the Agreement by providing at least six (6) months written notice prior to termination of the initial term or termination of any renewal period thereafter.
  (b)  
Notwithstanding Subsection (a) hereof, it is the intention of the Parties that the term of this Agreement shall not exceed the term of the Lease Agreement (defined below); accordingly, upon termination of the Lease Agreement, this Agreement shall also terminate, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Parties. The Lease Agreement is the Non-exclusive CO 2 Facility Site Lease Agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof and is identified as Exhibit B .
  3.  
Quantity and Price :
  (a)  
Cardinal Ethanol will supply to EPCO at the Matchpoint (at 5 p.s.i.g.) CO 2 Gas at a consistent Flow Rate sufficient for EPCO to produce 6.25 tons of Liquid CO 2 per hour as measured pursuant to Section 5 on a consistent basis 350 days per year or approximately 150 tons of Liquid CO2 per day. Cardinal Ethanol is allowed 15 days each Contract Year for scheduled or unscheduled maintenance and repairs to the Cardinal Ethanol Plant “downtime”. A day of downtime will be counted for every day in which the Cardinal Ethanol Plant is not operational for at least twelve hours or is providing CO2 Gas which does not meet Specifications for at least twelve hours. For Cardinal Ethanol’s downtime over the 15 days allowed, if the downtime continues for more than three (3) consecutive days, beginning with the 4 th consecutive day, EPCO will be provided a credit against the quantity purchased under Section 5 which shall be the greater of: a) 130 tons per day for each day of downtime; or b) the number of tons determined by dividing the total actual extra expense incurred by EPCO as a direct result of such downtime (the “Actual Expense”) by the applicable price per ton in Section 3(b) (the “CO2 Credit”). EPCO shall provide complete written documentation of such actual extra expense to Cardinal Ethanol on a monthly basis to substantiate any claimed CO2 Credit under this section. The Parties agree that the calculation of the Actual Expense shall be consistent with the sample calculation attached hereto as Exhibit C. EPCO’s take or pay obligation shall also be abated as described in and in accordance with the calculation provided in Section 4.
If Cardinal Ethanol, in its sole discretion, shuts down ethanol production due to economic conditions, Cardinal Ethanol shall not be liable for failure to perform or for delay in performing this Agreement. However, if the cessation of ethanol production continues for more than three (3) consecutive days, beginning with the 4 th consecutive day the CO2 Credit described above shall apply for each day that the the ethanol plant production is shut down for at least twelve hours. EPCO’s take or pay obligation shall also be abated as described in and in accordance with the calculation provided in Section 4. If ethanol plant production is shut down for more than sixty (60) consecutive days, either Party shall have the option to terminate this Agreement without penalty.

 

2


 

  (b)  
The price of CO 2 Gas shall be $5.00 per ton as measured each month according to Section 5(a). In the event EPCO expands the EPCO Plant, the CO2 price shall be increased $1.00/ton for every 100 tons/day of additional capacity added. The new price will be effective and applied to all tons supplied, not just the incremental capacity added.
  (c)  
EPCO shall meet all applicable legal requirements concerning the release of CO 2 Gas in its possession that are in force during the term and, whether a legal requirement or not, EPCO shall use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent venting of CO 2 Gas and to maximize recovery of condensation.
  (d)  
EPCO shall have the option during the initial term of this Agreement or any extension thereof, to expand the EPCO Plant. In the event EPCO expands the EPCO Plant, the Parties will mutually agree upon any increase in the quantity of CO2 Gas to be supplied at that time taking in to account the total volume of CO2 Gas needed on a daily basis by EPCO and the total supply of CO2 Gas available from Cardinal Ethanol. Cardinal Ethanol will use its best efforts to supply the additional volume mutually agreed upon. Pricing and measurement for any additional tons agreed upon shall be the same as stated in section 3 (b) and section 5 (a).
  4.  
Take or Pay Minimum :
  (a)  
During the term of this agreement EPCO agrees to pay Cardinal Ethanol for a minimum of 40,000 tons each Contract Year of the Agreement or approximately $200,000 annually (the “take or pay obligation”). This minimum quantity is based on a consistent flow of CO2 Gas from the ethanol source. The take or pay obligation will be “trued” up or determined on an annual basis. Within 15 days of the end of the applicable Contract Year, the parties shall determine any shortfall in the take or pay obligation. If there is a shortfall, EPCO shall pay the difference in the total amount paid during the year and its take or pay obligation within 30 days of the end of the applicable Contract Year. In the event EPCO expands the EPCO Plant, the take or pay amount shall be increased by 70% of the additional CO2 plant capacity added. The take or pay amount shall also be at the new CO2 price as determined by Section 3 (b) above.
  (b)  
EPCO’s obligation to take or pay shall abate beginning on the fourth consecutive day that EPCO is ready and able to “take” CO 2 Gas, but is unable to do so because (i) there exists a force majeure event affecting Cardinal Ethanol; (ii) there is a day of downtime as described in Section 3(a) over the 15 days allowed; (iii) the Flow Rate that can be provided by Cardinal Ethanol to EPCO falls below an amount sufficient for EPCO to produce the applicable take or pay quantity on a tons of Liquid CO2 per hour basis as set forth in 3(a); (iv) there has been a cessation of ethanol production at the Cardinal Ethanol Plant; or (v) there exists a force majeure event affecting EPCO. For purposes of this Section 4(b) , occurrences of any of the conditions set forth in items (i)-(v) hereof existing for periods of more than 12 hours in one day shall abate the take or pay obligation for the entire day that such condition existed. For purposes of this section EPCO’s take or pay obligation will be based on 114 tons/day (40,000 tons divided by 350 days). The take or pay obligation will be determined by multiplying the number of daily occurrences of the events in (4b i-v) times 114 tons/day and subtracting that result from 40,000 tons and multiplying by the applicable price per ton in Section 3(b). Notwithstanding the foregoing, EPCO shall be entitled to an abatement of the take or pay obligation only to the extent that the Shipped Tons for the applicable Contract Year are less than 40,000.
  5.  
Measurement/Quality :
  (a)  
Subject to section 4(a) above, the quantity of CO 2 Gas purchased by EPCO from Cardinal Ethanol shall be measured by the number of Shipped Tons, as determined on truck and/or rail scales located at the EPCO Plant. Cardinal Ethanol shall have the right to audit EPCO’s truck and rail scales at its expense. The Parties recognize there is no value of the CO2 sent to EPCO unless it is sold to customers.

 

3


 

  (b)  
EPCO will furnish certified bills of lading or other suitable records of daily production to Cardinal Ethanol on a daily basis which shall provide notes relative to the quality and quantity of CO 2 Gas and, upon request of Cardinal Ethanol, in a monthly cumulative report. Such records may omit the customer names and addresses but shall establish the number of Shipped Tons.
  (c)  
EPCO agrees to monitor the CO 2 Gas quality at its own expense to determine if the CO 2 Gas meets Specifications and agrees to promptly inform Cardinal Ethanol if it does not.
  (d)  
Cardinal Ethanol represents and warrants that the CO 2 Gas provided shall meet the Specifications set forth on Exhibit A . If there is a dispute as to whether the CO2 Gas meets Specifications, EPCO will have an independent testing lab test the gas for conformance and their decision will be binding on both parties. If the test results find that the CO2 Gas is non-conforming, Cardinal Ethanol will be responsible for the independent testing lab charges. The independent lab shall be chosen by agreement of both Parties.
  (e)  
EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT, CARDINAL ETHANOL MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  6.  
Payment and Terms :
Cardinal Ethanol shall bill EPCO monthly for the amount of CO 2 Gas purchased under the terms of this Agreement as measured in accordance with Section 5 hereof. EPCO shall pay net twenty (20) days from billing date. Any amounts due hereunder and not paid by the date due shall accrue interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law, whichever is less, determined and compounded on a daily basis from the date due until the date paid.
  7.  
Utilities
Cardinal Ethanol will furnish EPCO with 100% potable water up to 60 gpm. EPCO will use the water for its internal purposes (scrubber water, cooling tower water and sanitary water). EPCO will return its process water to Cardinal Ethanol and this process water will not exceed 30 gpm. EPCO will also return the cooling tower water back to Cardinal Ethanol for use in its cooling tower systems. All other waste return water will connect to the Cardinal Ethanol sewage sytem or EPCO may provide for its own sewage removal system. EPCO will pay Cardinal Ethanol for its actual incremental costs incurred to provide potable water or to take back waste water, plus a five percent (5%) surcharge. EPCO will contract directly with the applicable power company for its power supply. Cardinal Ethanol shall assist EPCO in providing a location as close as possible to the power source.
  8.  
Force Majeure :
  (a)  
Neither Party shall be liable for failure to perform or for delay in performing this Agreement where such failure or delay is occasioned by events constituting force majeure, and the Parties shall use all reasonable efforts to minimize the duration of any event of force majeure. For purposes of this Agreement “force majeure” shall include the following: (i) fire, explosion, strike, lock-out, labor dispute, casualty, accident or mechanical failure(s); (ii) lack or failure in whole or in part of transportation facilities; (c) storm, flood or drought; (iii) acts of God or of the public enemy, war, riots, police action, or civil commotion; (iv) any law, regulation, ordinance, demand, judgment, injunction, arbitral award, or other requirement or regulation of any federal, Indiana, or local government or government agency; and (v) any other act whatsoever, whether similar or dissimilar to those above enumerated, beyond the reasonable control of the party suffering such event of force majeure.

 

4


 

  (b)  
The Party asserting that an event of force majeure has occurred shall send or deliver to the other Party prompt written notice thereof setting forth a description of the event of force majeure, an estimate of its effect upon the Party’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement and the duration thereof. The notice shall be supplemented by such other information or documentation as the Party receiving the notice may reasonably request. As soon as possible after the cessation of any event of force majeure, the Party which asserted such event shall give the other Party written notice of such cessation. Whenever possible, each Party shall give the other Party notice of any threatened or impending event of force majeure, and the Parties shall use all reasonable efforts to minimize the duration of any event of force majeure. If either Party has a force majeure event which lasts for more than ninety (90) days, either Party shall have the option to terminate this Agreement.
  (c)  
It is agreed that if either the Cardinal Ethanol Plant or the EPCO Plant is destroyed by a force majeure event, the affected Party shall not be required to rebuild its facility and this Agreement will be terminated without penalty.
  9.  
Delivery of Product/Utilities .
  (a)  
The CO 2 Gas piping and water supply/return piping from the Cardinal Ethanol Plant to the match point will be installed by EPCO. EPCO will split out the costs associated with the installation on Cardinal Ethanol’s side of the match point. Cardinal Ethanol has the option to have this work done by EPCO, or to have its own contractors do the work. If Cardinal Ethanol’s contractors perform the work, the CO2 credit below will not be applicable. If EPCO performs the work on Cardinal Ethanol’s side of the matchpoint, the cost shall be reimbursed to EPCO via a CO2 credit of $2/ton until the total capital cost is recouped. After installation, Cardinal Ethanol will be responsible for maintaining the CO2 and water lines on its side of the match point. EPCO will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the CO2 and water piping on its side of the match point. EPCO will also own and operate the blower supplying the EPCO Plant.
  (b)  
Title to and risk of loss of CO 2 Gas shall pass from Cardinal Ethanol to EPCO at the Matchpoint, but the quantity of CO 2 Gas sold and purchased hereunder shall nonetheless be measured in accordance with Section 5a hereof.
  (c)  
Each Party will be responsible for any clean-up which is necessary due to a spill or leak from that portion of the pipeline which it is required to maintain. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if one Party is solely responsible for physical damage to the portion of the pipeline located on the other’s premises, the former shall be liable for damages caused to the pipeline and for other directly related damages, such as, but not limited to, clean-up expenses, and shall take prompt, appropriate, corrective action.
  10.  
Damages/Indemnification/Warranties .
  (a)  
EPCO shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Cardinal Ethanol from and against any and all claims, loss, costs, expenses, damages, liability (including attorneys’ fees and expenses) arising from EPCO’s violation of any law, rule or regulation (including but not limited to any environmental law, rule or regulation) as well as any use of the leased premises, or from the conduct of EPCO’s business (including, but not limited to, any product liability claims arising therefrom) or from any activity, work or things done, permitted or suffered by EPCO in or about the leased premises, or arising from any negligence of EPCO, or any of EPCO’s customers, invitees, contractors, occupants, or employees, and from and against all loss, damage, liability, costs, attorneys’ fees, costs

 

5


 

and expenses and liabilities incurred in the defense of any such claim or any action or proceeding brought thereon; and in case any action or proceeding be brought against Cardinal Ethanol by reason of any such claim, EPCO, upon notice from Cardinal Ethanol, shall defend the same at EPCO expense. EPCO as a material part of the consideration to Cardinal Ethanol, hereby assumes all risk of damage to property or injury to persons, in, upon or about the leased premises arising from any cause other than Cardinal Ethanol’s negligent or willful misconduct). Notwithstanding the foregoing, EPCO shall have no obligation under this Section 10(a) for property damage or personal injury arising directly or indirectly from the willful misconduct or negligent acts of Cardinal Ethanol, or its agents, employees or contractors. EPCO shall maintain comprehensive or Commercial General Liability insurance on an occurrence form with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage and general and product/completed operations aggregates of $1,000,000 each. Excess or Umbrella Liability insurance with a combined single limit of $4,000,000 each occurrence and annual aggregates of $4,000,000 will also be maintained for general and product/completed operations. Cardinal Ethanol will be a named additional insured under the policy. Cardinal Ethanol shall receive notification of any lapse in coverage.
  (b)  
Cardinal Ethanol shall be responsible, hold harmless, indemnify and defend EPCO for property damage or personal injury liability caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Cardinal Ethanol at the Cardinal Ethanol Plant, provided, however, that Cardinal Ethanol shall have no obligation under this Section 10(b) for property damage or personal injury arising directly or indirectly from the willful misconduct or negligent acts of EPCO, or its agents, employees or contractors.
  (c)  
EPCO warrants and agrees to comply with any and all Indiana and federal laws including licensing requirements. EPCO will undertake, at its sole cost and expense, all actions which may be necessary or required to comply, with all federal, Indiana, and local laws, rules and regulations related to the use, condition, or occupancy of the EPCO Plant site or the construction of improvements thereon.
  11.  
Confidentiality and Non-Competition :
  (a)  
The Parties hereby acknowledge that in the course of engaging in the sale and purchase of CO 2 Gas contemplated by this Agreement, each will have access to Confidential Information which includes but is not limited to each other’s business operations, the identity of customers, the quantity of Liquid CO 2 used by such customers, shipping records, pricing, customer lists, production methods, technical and non-technical data, formulae, patterns, compilations, programs, devices, methods, techniques, drawings, processes, financial data, information regarding actual and potential customers of each Party and actual and potential suppliers of each Party. The Parties agree that all such Confidential Information shall be kept secret and confidential. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the confidentiality obligations of the receiving Party shall not extend to information that:
  A.  
is, as of the time of its disclosure, or thereafter becomes part of the public domain through a source other than receiving Party;
  B.  
was known by the receiving Party as of the time of its disclosure;
  C.  
is independently developed by the receiving Party;
  D.  
is subsequently learned from a third party not under a confidentiality obligation; or
  E.  
is required to be disclosed pursuant to court order or government authority, whereupon the receiving Party shall provide advance notice to the disclosing Party prior to such disclosure.
  (b)  
The Parties further acknowledge that violation of the provisions of this Section shall constitute irreparable injury and shall entitle the non-violating Party to temporary preliminary and/or permanent injunctive relief, in addition to any other remedy at law or in equity.

 

6


 

  (c)  
During the term of this Agreement, Cardinal Ethanol will not market, sell, provide, or attempt to market, sell, or provide raw CO 2 Gas or liquefied CO 2 Gas from Cardinal Ethanol’s ethanol facility in ( Union City), ( Indiana) to any other end user or party except as provided herein. In the event Cardinal Ethanol expands its ethanol facility, thereby making additional quantities of raw CO2 gas available, EPCO shall have the right of first refusal on any and all additional quantities of raw gas. EPCO shall not be obligated to take or pay for any such additional quantities of raw gas unless taken. If additional quantities are offered and not taken by EPCO, Cardinal Ethanol may sell such additional quantities of raw gas to another end user or party.
  12.  
Insurance : EPCO shall furnish Cardinal Ethanol certificates of insurance with thirty (30) days notice of cancellation and/or change in coverage clause as evidence of the following coverages with respect to the EPCO Plant:
  (a)  
Worker’s Compensation as prescribed by law and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per person and $1,000,000 per accident;
  (b)  
Comprehensive Public Liability and Automobile Liability, including broad form contractual liability provision to cover any liability assumed by EPCO under this Agreement, with a combined single limit of $5,000,000 Property Damage and Bodily Injury.
  13.  
Assignment : Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, no assignment by the Parties of all or part of its rights and obligations shall be made without the consent of the non-assigning Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event Cardinal Ethanol sells the Cardinal Ethanol Plant, EPCO may, at its sole option, terminate this Agreement without any penalty.
  14.  
Termination: Either Party may, at its option, terminate this Agreement in the event of an uncured material breach of this Agreement by the other party. Such termination may be effected only through written notice to the breaching Party, which notice shall specify the breach on which termination is based. Following receipt of such notice, the breaching Party shall have ninety (90) days to cure such breach. Provided however, that in the event of a failure to pay amounts payable by EPCO under this Agreement, EPCO shall have twenty (20) days following receipt of written notice to cure said breach. The Agreement shall terminate, on notice given by the non-breaching party, in the event such cure is not affected by the end of the applicable period, or longer period as determined by the non-breaching party.
EPCO agrees to maintain and repair at EPCO’s expense the entirety of the EPCO Plant site, to keep the entire EPCO Plant site in good repair and condition and at the termination of this Agreement to deliver the EPCO Plant site to Cardinal Ethanol in the same condition as at the date hereof, reasonable wear and tear excepted. EPCO shall have 90 days to relocate the EPCO Plant and return the plant site to the same condition as at the date hereof.
  15.  
Entire Agreement : This Agreement and the Lease Agreement contain the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and there are no oral promises, representations, or other warranties affecting them. No amendment or modifications of any of the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon either Cardinal Ethanol or EPCO unless the same be expressed in writing and signed by both Parties.

 

7


 

  16.  
Miscellaneous :
  (a)  
Headings are for reference only, and do not affect the meaning of any paragraph.
  (b)  
Any provision of this Agreement which is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction.
  (c)  
The failure of either Party to require strict compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement in any one situation shall not constitute a waiver of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
  (d)  
EPCO acknowledges that Cardinal Ethanol is a tobacco free workplace. The smoking, chewing, or dipping of any tobacco product is strictly prohibited on the premise. It is also the policy of Cardinal Ethanol to maintain a drug free workforce and workplace. The use, possession, manufacture, distribution, dispensation, sale or purchase of an illegal drug or beverage alcohol by any employee at any time is prohibited. EPCO also acknowledges that Cardinal Ethanol bans firearms and any other weapons on its property. EPCO agrees that EPCO and its employees will comply with these and all other policies of Cardinal Ethanol. EPCO also agrees that all employees of Cardinal Ethanol and EPCO will use the parking lot east of the Cardinal Ethanol administration building for vehicle transportation to and from work.
  17.  
Notices : Notices and other communications between the Parties hereto shall be in writing (by mail, telex, telecopy or telegraph unless a particular mode is specified herein), postage or transmission costs prepaid, and shall be addressed to the Parties hereto the addresses set forth below:
     
To
  Cardinal Ethanol:
 
  1554 N. 600 E
 
  Union City, IN 47390
 
  Telephone: 765-964-3137
 
  Fax: 765-964-3349
 
   
TO EPCO:
  EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc.
 
  1811 Auburn Avenue
 
  Monroe, Louisiana 71201
 
  Telephone: (318) 361-0870
 
  Fax:     (318) 361-0047
All such Notices and communications shall be deemed effective on (i) the date of transmission, if sent by telecopy or if sent by telex, with confirmed answer back, or (ii) the date that is five (5) calendar days after the date on which deposited or sent, if sent by mail or telegraph. Each Party hereto may change its address for purposes hereof by Notice given to the other Party in the manner prescribed herein.

 

8


 

  18.  
Governing Law, Forum and Jurisdiction. The validity, construction and enforcement of this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the laws of (Indiana), without reference to its conflicts of laws principles, and any action arising under this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in (Indiana). Both parties consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Indiana courts located in (Indiana) and federal courts located in (Indiana).
  19.  
Contingency. Not applicable.
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

 

9


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed, this 8th day of March, 2010.
                 
Attest:       EPCO CARBON DIOXIDE PRODUCTS, INC.    
 
               
/s/ Denise Wiesemann
 
Secretary
      BY:   / s/ Darrell Craft          3-8-10
 
Executive Vice President
   
 
               
Attest:       CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC    
 
               
/s/ Tom Chalfant
 
Secretary
      BY:   /s/ Jeffrey Painter          3-10-10
 
CEO/President
   

 

10


 

EXHIBIT A
CO2 SPECIFICATIONS
Concentrations by Volume
     
Description   Specification
 
CO2
  99.0% (mol)
O2
  6,000 PPM
N2
  24,000 PPM
Ethanol
  200 PPM maximum
Acetaldehyde
  50 PPM maximum
Dimethyl Sulfide
  1 PPM maximum
Other Hydrocarbons
  20 PPM maximum
SO2
  10 PPM maximum
COS
  10 PPM maximum
H2S
  10 PPM maximum
Total Sulfur
  40 PPM maximum
 
Tenperature
  100 degrees F at the Matchpoint at 5 p.s.i.g.
EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc.
         
Signed:
Date:
  /s/ Darrel Craft
 
3-8-10
   
Cardinal Ethanol, LLC
         
Signed:
Date:
  /s/ Jeffrey Painter
 
3-10-10
   

 


 

EXHIBIT B
NON-EXCLUSIVE CO2 FACILITY SITE LEASE AGREEMENT
TBD
In Process
EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc.
         
Signed:
Date:
  /s/ Darrel Craft
 
3-8-10
   
Cardinal Ethanol, LLC
         
Signed:
Date:
  /s/ Jeffrey Painter
 
3-10-10
   

 


 

EXHIBIT C
Extra Expense Calculation
                                             
    Normal                     Applicable     Extra      
Product Costs   $/Ton     Actual     Diff     Tons/$     Expense     Comment
CO2-Union City
    5.00                                      
Electric-Variable-Union City
    5.70                                      
 
                                         
Total Variable Product Cost
    10.70       187.88       8.18       260.00     $ 2,126.00     See detail below on $18.88
Total Miles to Deliver Product — 260 Tons
    1,857       2,500                     $ 707.30     $1.10 = EPCO Variable trasnp. Cost.
 
                                         
 
                                          (Diesel, Driver Pay, Var. Maint.)
Total Extra Expense-$$$
                                  $ 2,833.30      
 
                                           
CO2 Price-$/Ton
                                  $ 5.00      
 
                                           
CO2 Tons Claimed
                                    567      
                                 
    Ton     $/Ton     Amount          
Product Purchase-Detail
                               
O/S Company A
    60       40.00       2,400.00          
EPCO-Marion
    140       7.20       1,008.00     See detail Below
Company C
    60       25.00       1,500.00          
 
                         
 
    260       18.88       4,908.00          
 
                               
EPCO-Internal Variable Cost
                               
EPCO-Marion CO2
    4.00                          
EPCO-Marion Variable CO2
    3.20                          
 
                             
 
    7.20                          
EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc.
         
Signed:
Date:
  /s/ Darrel Craft
 
3-8-10
   
Cardinal Ethanol, LLC
         
Signed:
Date:
  /s/ Jeffrey Painter
 
3-10-10
   

 

Exhibit 10.3
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
THIS CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered in to on the 10th day of May, 2010 by and between Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (“Owner”) and LAH Development, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“Contractor”).
WHEREAS, Owner is constructing a bushel bin storage system, as outlined in project specifications dated April 14, 2010 (the “Specifications”) (the “Bin”); and
WHEREAS, Owner wishes to engage Contractor and Contractor wishes to accept such engagement to provide materials and construction services as provided for in this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged. The parties hereby agree as follows:
1.  Scope of Work. Contractor agrees to provide all of the material and labor required to construct the Bin, including but not limited to all electrical work.
2.  Date of Commencement and Completion. Commencement of construction of the Bin shall begin on June 1, 2010 and construction of the Bin shall, be completed no later than October 1, 2010. The “Completion of Construction” shall mean Contractor’s completion of construction of the Bin in accordance with the Specifications and Owner’s acceptance thereof.
3.  Contract Sum. The Owner shall pay to the Contractor one million seven hundred forty-six thousand dollars ($1,746,000.00) (the “Contract Sum”) for the Contractor’s construction of the Bin in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Contract Sum shall be equitably adjusted in accordance with any Change Orders that are required; however, such Change Orders shall be effective only upon prior written agreement by the Owner and Contractor.
4. Payments . The Contract Sum shall be payable as follows:
  a.  
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the Contract Sum or four hundred thirty-six thousand five hundred dollars ($436,500.00) shall be due upon execution of this Agreement.
  b.  
Contractor shall provide an invoice to Owner not later than the Thirtieth (30) day of each month. The invoice shall indicate the percentage of completion of the construction of the Bin as of the end of the period covered by the invoice. Owner shall have fifteen (15) business days to pay the percentage of the Contract Sum equal to the percentage of completion of construction of the Bin since the previous invoice.
  c.  
The entire Contract Sum shall be paid in full no later than thirty (30) days after the Completion of Construction.

 

 


 

  d.  
The Owner may adjust or reject an invoice or nullify a previously approved invoice, in whole or in part, as may reasonably be necessary to protect the Owner from loss or damage based upon the following:
  i.  
Contractor’s failure to construct the Bin as required by this Agreement and the Specifications;
  ii.  
loss or damage arising out of or relating to this Agreement and caused by the Contractor to the Owner, or others to whom the Owner may be liable;
  iii.  
the Contractor’s failure to pay the Architect/Engineer or Subcontractors for labor, materials, equipment or supplies properly furnished in connection with the construction of the Bin, provided that the Owner is making payments to the Contractor in accordance with the terms of this Agreement;
  iv.  
defective work not corrected in a timely fashion; and
  v.  
reasonable evidence demonstrating that the unpaid balance of the Contract Sum is insufficient to fund the cost to complete the construction of the Bin.
When the above reasons for disapproving or nullifying an invoice are removed, payment will be made for the amounts previously withheld.
5. Construction. Contractor agrees to provide and pay for all necessary construction supervision, inspection, construction equipment, construction labor, materials, tools and subcontracted items for the construction of the Bin.
6.  Liquidated Damages for Delay in Completion. Without prejudice to any other right or remedy, if the Completion of Construction does not occur on or before October 1, 2010, Contractor shall pay liquidated damages (the “Liquidated Damages”) to the Owner as follows:
  a.  
If the Completion of Construction does not take place on or before October 1, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner five thousand dollars ($5,000).
  b.  
If the Completion of Construction does not take place on or before October 8, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
  c.  
If the Completion of Construction does not take place on or before October 15, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000).
  d.  
If the Completion of Construction does not take place on or before October 22, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).

 

 


 

  e.  
If the Completion of Construction does not take place on or before October 29, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner forty thousand dollars ($40,000).
  f.  
If the Completion of Construction does not take place on or before November 5, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner fifty-five thousand dollars ($55,000).
  g.  
If the Completion of Construction does not take place on or before November 12, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner sixty thousand dollars ($60,000).
  h.  
If the Completion of Construction is after November 12, 2010, Contractor shall pay to the Owner seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000).
The Liquidated Damages, if any, shall be due and payable within fifteen (15) business days following the Completion of Construction.
7.  Access by Owner and Public Authorities. Owner, Owner’s representatives and public authorities shall at all times have access to the site where the Bin is being constructed.
8.  Warranty. Contractor shall provide all required notices and shall at all times comply with the requirements of all applicable laws, rules or regulations. Contractor agrees to promptly re-execute any construction of the Bin which the Owner determines does not comply with the Specifications, without any additional charge to Owner. Contractor warrants the construction of the Bin and agrees to promptly remedy any defects resulting from faulty materials or workmanship which shall become evident during a period of one (1) year after the completion of the construction of the Bin without any additional charge to Owner. This Section 8 regarding warranties of the Contractor shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
9.  Delays in Work Beyond Contractor’s Control. In the event Contractor is delayed in the construction of the Bin by acts of God, fire, flood or any other unavoidable casualties; or by labor strikes, late delivery of materials; or by neglect of Owner; the time for completion of the construction of the Bin shall be extended for the same period as the delay occasioned by any of the aforementioned causes.
10.  Clean-Up. The Contractor shall keep the premises and area surrounding the Bin free from accumulation of waste materials or rubbish caused by operations under this Agreement. Upon completion of the construction of the Bin, the Contractor shall remove all waste materials, rubbish, the Contractor’s tools, construction equipment machinery and surplus materials.
11.  Safety. The Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining, and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of this Agreement and the construction of the Bin as provided for herein.

 

 


 

12. Termination or Suspension of the Agreement.
  a.  
Suspension by the Owner for Convenience.
  i.  
The Owner may order the Contractor, in writing, to suspend, delay or interrupt all or any part of the construction of the Bin without cause for such period of time as the Owner may determine to be appropriate for its convenience.
  ii.  
Adjustments caused by suspension, delay or interruption shall be made for increases in the Contract Sum and/or the date of completion. No adjustment shall be made if the Contractor is or otherwise would have been responsible for the suspension, delay or interruption of the construction of the Bin, or if another provision of this Agreement is applied to render an equitable adjustment.
  b.  
Owner’s Right to Perform Contractor’s Obligations and Termination by the Owner for Cause.
  i.  
If the Contractor persistently fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, the Owner may, after five (5) days’ written notice, during which period the Contractor fails to perform such obligation, undertake to perform such obligations. The Contract Sum shall be reduced by the cost to the Owner of performing such obligations.
  ii.  
Upon five (5) days’ written notice to the Contractor and the Contractor’s surety, if any, the Owner may terminate this Agreement for any of the following reasons:
  1.  
if the Contractor utilizes improper materials and/or inadequately skilled workers;
  2.  
if the Contractor does not make proper payment to laborers, material suppliers or contractors provided that the Owner is making payments to the Contractor in accordance with the terms of this Agreement;
  3.  
if the Contractor fails to abide by the orders, regulations, rules, ordinances or laws of governmental authorities having jurisdiction; or
  4.  
if the Contractor otherwise materially breaches this Agreement.
  iii.  
If the Contractor fails to cure or commence and continue to cure within the five (5) days, the Owner, without prejudice to any other right or remedy, may take possession of the worksite and complete the construction of the Bin utilizing any reasonable means. In this event, the Contractor shall not have a right to further payment until the Completion of Construction.

 

 


 

  iv.  
If the Contractor files a petition under the Bankruptcy Code, this Agreement shall terminate if the Contractor or the Contractor’s trustee rejects the Agreement or, if there has been a default, the Contractor is unable to give adequate assurance that the Contractor will perform as required by this Agreement or otherwise is unable to comply with the requirements for assuming this Agreement under the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
  c.  
Termination by Owner Without Cause. If the Owner terminates this Agreement other than as set forth in Section 12(b) herein, the Owner shall pay the Contractor for all completed construction work on the Bin and for all proven loss, cost or expense in connection with the construction of the Bin and the Contractor shall have no other remedy, including but not limited to incidental or consequential damages, against the Owner.
13.  Insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain insurance coverage to protect itself against claims for workers’ compensation, unemployment, property damage, bodily injury or death due to its performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall purchase and maintain commercial general liability insurance with combined single limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) which shall be endorsed to require at least thirty (30) days notice to Owner prior to the effective date of any termination or cancellation of coverage. Contractor shall provide a certificate of insurance to Owner to establish the coverage maintained before commencement of the construction of the Bin. Also, during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall purchase and maintain comprehensive automobile liability insurance, with combined single limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000), which shall be endorsed to require at least thirty (30) days notice to Owner prior to the effective date of any termination or cancellation of coverage. Contractor shall provide a certificate of insurance to Owner to establish coverage maintained before the commencement of the construction of the Bin.
14.  Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Owner, Owner’s officers, directors, members, consultants, agents and employees from all claims for bodily injury and property damage that may arise from the performance of this Agreement. The Contractor shall not be required to defend, indemnify or hold harmless the Owner, the Owner’s officers, directors, members, consultants, agents and employees for any acts, omissions or negligence of the Owner, Owner’s officers, directors, members, consultants, employees, agents or separate contractors. This Section 14 regarding indemnity shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
15.  Attorney’s Fees. In any action or proceeding brought to enforce or otherwise arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to have its attorney’s fees paid by the non-prevailing party.
16.  Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence in completion of this Agreement and construction of the Bin as provided for herein.

 

 


 

17.  Miscellaneous . This Agreement, together with any exhibits and attachments hereto and any documents incorporated herein, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties concerning the subject matter hereof No prior or contemporaneous representations, inducements, promises or agreements not contained herein are of any force or effect. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Indiana law, and shall not be modified except in a writing signed by all parties. This Agreement is binding upon the parties and their heirs, representatives, agents, successors and permitted assigns. Neither this Agreement nor any parties’ rights, duties, responsibilities or obligations shall be assigned by either party, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. If any provision herein is held to be invalid, unenforceable, or contrary to public policy, in whole or in part, the remaining provisions shall not be affected. No omission or delay by either party in enforcing any right or remedy or in requiring any performance hereunder shall constitute a waiver of any such right, remedy or required performance, nor shall it affect the right of either party to enforce such provision thereafter. The remedies set forth herein are cumulative and in addition to all other remedies available hereunder, at law and in equity. The headings contained herein are for convenience only and shall not be considered in interpreting or construing this Agreement. All covenants, warranties, representations and indemnification obligations set forth in this Agreement shall survive the termination or expiration hereof This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and facsimile signatures shall be binding upon the parties.
[Signature Page to Follow]

 

 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
                     
Cardinal Ethanol, LLC       LAH Development, LLC    
 
                   
By:
  /s/ Jeffrey L. Painter
 
Its: CEO/President
      By:   /s/ Sy Hart
 
Its:
 
   
 
  5/11/2010                

 

 


 

Cardinal Ethanol, LLC
Grain Bin Project Specifications
April 2, 2010
General Specifications:
Design and Engineering
   
Nu Way to supply design drawings
 
   
Finish design will be approved by owner (Cardinal Ethanol, LLC) prior to start of project
Excavation and Concrete
   
Excavate for bin footer and walls (dirt left on property)
 
   
13′ x 2′5″ footer
 
   
10′ high x 18″ wide exterior wall
 
   
8′ x 8′ access tunnel
 
   
Quad “F” aeration floor
 
   
Stone and compaction
 
   
Required concrete and rebar
105′ x 34 Ring System
   
90′ — 10″ Eave height; 119′ — 10″ peak height
 
   
730,245 bushel capacity
 
   
25,000 LB. peak load roof
 
   
2 ring commercial walk in door
 
   
Inside and outside ladder system
 
   
Roof stairs
 
   
10′ peak walk around
 
   
16′ center discharge with electric gate
 
   
(10) 12″ intermediate manual gates
 
   
1/10 CFM/BU Quad “F” aeration monorail flush floor system
 
   
(4) 30 hp. 3 ph 230/460 V centrifugal fans
 
   
(45) grill vents
 
   
(10) 24″ exhausters, 2 hp, 3 ph explosion proof fans
 
   
(24) temperature cable supports
 
   
10K BPH series 2 bin sweep (Zero Entry, One Pass sweep)

 

 


 

Top Fill System
   
6′ wide x 125′ handrail truss catwalk w24″ grip strut walkway on one side
   
(1) 4 legged support tower
   
(1) 2 legged support tower tied to bin
   
Support structure at bin top
   
40,000 BPH GSI En-Masse conveyor
   
(2) 50 hp, 3 ph TEFC Motors
   
Duel TA9415 Dodge Reducers
   
3/16″ AR Bolt on bottom
   
10 ga. AR side liner
   
Lined head discharge
   
Slack chain detection with limit switch
   
End relief door with limit switch
   
Transition from new conveyor to new bin
   
Agri dry spreader system as per request
Unloading System
   
10,000 BPH GSI En-Masse Conveyor
   
30hp, 3 ph TEFC motor
 
   
3/16″ AR bolt on bottom
 
   
10 ga. AR side liner
 
   
Lined head discharge
 
   
Slack chain detection with limit switch
 
   
End relief door with limit switch
   
(11) Inlet transitions
 
   
Lined transition from new conveyor to the existing conveyor
Wireless Temperature Detection System
   
(24) Detection cables with hardware
 
   
PCI interface with software
 
   
Control wire
 
   
Remote Multiplexer
 
   
Point to point wireless radio
 
   
Thermocouple lead wires
 
   
Operation Manual

 

 


 

Notes:
All new steel will be primed painted
Job site will be maintained in a clean and professional manner at all times
All OSHA safety rules will be met or exceeded
         
PROJECT COST
  $ 1,490,000  
Option:
   
40,000 GSI Enclosed Belt conveyor
   
90 ft. c/c
 
   
40 hp drive system
 
   
5 deg. Incline
 
   
1/2″ UHMW bottom liner
 
   
Plug switch
 
   
Shaft monitor
         
DEDUCT
  $ 30,000  

 

 


 

Cardinal Ethanol, LLC
Grain Bin Project Specifications
April 14, 2010
Revisions to Grain 3 in quote of April 2, 2010:
   
Extending the existing bottom unload drag
 
   
Revising the tunnel height to 6′ — 6″
   
Extending existing top fill drag with new platform (10′ long with 12′x12′ platform) Support system from new tower and ladder access to new top catwalk
   
Two (2) 4 legged support towers
   
Price increases of equipment.
   
Motion detection equipment, rub sensors and other applicable safety equipment as required
   
Bin Bob level indicator and high level indicator included in pricing.
         
Revised Price
  $ 1,561,000  
Electrical
   
Furnish all material, equipment, labor, evaluation/study, etc. that is necessary to complete the project.
         
Electrical Cost
  $ 185,000  
         
Total revised complete project cost
  $ 1,746,000  

 

 

Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
I, Jeff Painter, certify that:
1.  
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC;
2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.  
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  c)  
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  d)  
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
Date: May 14, 2010  /s/ Jeff Painter    
  Jeff Painter, Chief Executive Officer
(President and Principal Executive Officer)
 

 

 

Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
I, William Dartt, certify that:
1.  
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC;
2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.  
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  c)  
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  d)  
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
Date: May 14, 2010  /s/ William Dartt    
  William Dartt, Chief Financial Officer   
  (Principal Financial Officer)   

 

 

Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q in accordance with Rule 15(d)-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff Painter, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
  /s/ Jeff Painter    
  Jeff Painter, President   
  and Principal Executive Officer
Dated: May 14, 2010
 

 

 

Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q in accordance with Rule 15(d)-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Dartt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
  /s/ William Dartt    
  William Dartt,   
  Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: May 14, 2010