Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q
 
     
(Mark One)    
þ
  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010.
or
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    for the transition period from          to          .
 
Commission File Number: 0-50150
 
CHS Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Minnesota
  41-0251095
( State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  ( I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number
)
 
     
5500 Cenex Drive
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
(
Address of principal
executive offices, including zip code)
  (651) 355-6000
( Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code
)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  þ      NO  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES  o      NO  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  o Non-accelerated filer  þ Smaller reporting company  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES  o      NO  þ
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
     
    Number of Shares Outstanding at
Class
 
July 8, 2010
 
NONE
  NONE
 


 

 
INDEX
 
             
        PAGE
        NO.
 
  Financial Statements (unaudited)     2  
    Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2010, August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009     3  
    Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009     4  
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009     5  
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements     6  
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     18  
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     37  
  Controls and Procedures     37  
 
  Risk Factors     38  
  Exhibits     39  
SIGNATURE PAGE     40  
  EX-10.1
  EX-10.2
  EX-10.3
  EX-31.1
  EX-31.2
  EX-32.1
  EX-32.2


1


Table of Contents

 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
 
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. These factors include those set forth in Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the caption “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010.


2


Table of Contents

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
CHS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
                         
    May 31,
    August 31,
    May 31,
 
    2010     2009     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
ASSETS
Current assets:
                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 305,322     $ 772,599     $ 166,480  
Receivables
    2,038,681       1,827,749       2,089,913  
Inventories
    1,650,579       1,526,280       2,022,804  
Derivative assets
    103,196       171,340       274,913  
Other current assets
    466,043       447,655       682,538  
                         
Total current assets
    4,563,821       4,745,623       5,236,648  
Investments
    653,460       727,925       757,848  
Property, plant and equipment
    2,195,028       2,099,325       2,054,692  
Other assets
    280,199       296,972       321,241  
                         
Total assets
  $ 7,692,508     $ 7,869,845     $ 8,370,429  
                         
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITIES
Current liabilities:
                       
Notes payable
  $ 213,811     $ 246,872     $ 554,981  
Current portion of long-term debt
    108,336       83,492       95,821  
Customer credit balances
    170,866       274,343       235,012  
Customer advance payments
    268,344       320,688       487,730  
Checks and drafts outstanding
    105,732       86,845       153,735  
Accounts payable
    1,234,604       1,289,139       1,223,207  
Derivative liabilities
    183,935       306,116       352,545  
Accrued expenses
    320,868       308,720       308,644  
Dividends and equities payable
    136,191       203,056       108,701  
                         
Total current liabilities
    2,742,687       3,119,271       3,520,376  
Long-term debt
    915,504       988,461       1,026,402  
Other liabilities
    456,079       428,949       412,119  
Commitments and contingencies
                       
Equities:
                       
Equity certificates
    2,182,100       2,214,824       2,019,579  
Preferred stock
    319,368       282,694       282,694  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (157,624 )     (156,270 )     (83,958 )
Capital reserves
    972,357       749,054       944,980  
                         
Total CHS Inc. equities
    3,316,201       3,090,302       3,163,295  
Noncontrolling interests
    262,037       242,862       248,237  
                         
Total equities
    3,578,238       3,333,164       3,411,532  
                         
Total liabilities and equities
  $ 7,692,508     $ 7,869,845     $ 8,370,429  
                         
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).


3


Table of Contents

CHS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended
    For the Nine Months Ended
 
    May 31,     May 31,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Revenues
  $ 6,575,978     $ 6,163,119     $ 18,649,712     $ 19,074,107  
Cost of goods sold
    6,324,000       6,004,851       18,028,348       18,380,355  
                                 
Gross profit
    251,978       158,268       621,364       693,752  
Marketing, general and administrative
    96,024       90,417       268,585       277,131  
                                 
Operating earnings
    155,954       67,851       352,779       416,621  
(Gain) loss on investments
    (10,368 )     3,726       (24,143 )     55,701  
Interest, net
    14,526       16,312       44,997       50,262  
Equity income from investments
    (29,682 )     (42,985 )     (80,782 )     (74,096 )
                                 
Income before income taxes
    181,478       90,798       412,707       384,754  
Income taxes
    21,983       14,226       44,518       47,178  
                                 
Net income
    159,495       76,572       368,189       337,576  
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    14,046       12,003       20,122       53,476  
                                 
Net income attributable to CHS Inc. 
  $ 145,449     $ 64,569     $ 348,067     $ 284,100  
                                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).


4


Table of Contents

CHS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
                 
    For the Nine Months Ended
 
    May 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income including noncontrolling interests
  $ 368,189     $ 337,576  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    151,603       144,683  
Amortization of deferred major repair costs
    14,091       18,324  
Income from equity investments
    (80,782 )     (74,096 )
Distributions from equity investments
    79,175       57,214  
Noncash patronage dividends received
    (1,902 )     (3,229 )
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment
    (4,437 )     (3,453 )
(Gain) loss on investments
    (24,143 )     55,701  
Deferred taxes
    24,136       17,814  
Other, net
    (1,952 )     2,839  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Receivables
    (159,689 )     505,076  
Inventories
    (124,252 )     366,904  
Derivative assets
    69,827       94,589  
Other current assets and other assets
    (16,541 )     (46,230 )
Customer credit balances
    (103,477 )     8,652  
Customer advance payments
    (52,344 )     (161,799 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (41,113 )     (716,003 )
Derivative liabilities
    (122,181 )     78,954  
Other liabilities
    3,471       (5,276 )
                 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
    (22,321 )     678,240  
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
    (237,477 )     (225,888 )
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment
    8,081       8,902  
Expenditures for major repairs
    (5,112 )     (34 )
Investments
    (15,389 )     (115,657 )
Investments redeemed
    113,979       10,836  
Proceeds from sale of investments
            41,612  
Joint venture distribution transaction, net
            850  
Changes in notes receivable
    (56,793 )     71,454  
Acquisition of intangibles
    (1,014 )     (1,320 )
Business acquisitions, net of cash received
            (76,364 )
Other investing activities, net
            320  
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (193,725 )     (285,289 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Changes in notes payable
    (33,061 )     60,758  
Principal payments on long-term debt
    (46,885 )     (68,572 )
Payments for bank fees on debt
    (100 )     (1,584 )
Changes in checks and drafts outstanding
    18,886       (52,412 )
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
    (1,987 )     (18,610 )
Preferred stock dividends paid
    (17,112 )     (14,536 )
Retirements of equities
    (17,034 )     (40,835 )
Cash patronage dividends paid
    (153,891 )     (227,590 )
Other financing activities, net
    (47 )     370  
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (251,231 )     (363,011 )
                 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (467,277 )     29,940  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    772,599       136,540  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 305,322     $ 166,480  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).


5


Table of Contents

CHS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
 
Note 1.   Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation and Reclassifications
 
The unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2010 and 2009, the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash flows for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, reflect in the opinion of our management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full fiscal year because of, among other things, the seasonal nature of our businesses. Our Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of August 31, 2009, has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of all of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and limited liability companies. The effects of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
 
These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended August 31, 2009, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860-10-65-1, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51.” ASC 860-10-65-1 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require: the ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheets within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; the amount of consolidated net earnings attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statements of operations; and changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted for consistently.
 
We adopted ASC 860-10-65-1 at the beginning of fiscal 2010. In accordance with the accounting guidance, in order to conform to the current period presentation, we made reclassifications within our Consolidated Statements of Operations to present the income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a reconciling item between net income and net income attributable to CHS Inc. Also, noncontrolling interests previously reported as minority interests have been reclassified to a separate section in equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, certain other reclassifications to our previously reported financial information have been made to conform to the current period presentation.
 
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
Our derivative instruments primarily consist of commodity and freight futures and forward contracts and, to a minor degree, may include foreign currency and interest rate swap contracts. These contracts are economic hedges of price risk, but are not designated or accounted for as hedging instruments for accounting purposes with the exception of some derivative instruments included in our Energy segment. Derivative instruments are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair values as discussed in Note 11, Fair Value Measurements.
 
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, certain financial contracts within our Energy segment were entered into for the spread between crude oil purchase price and distillate selling price, and have been designated and accounted for as hedging instruments (cash flow hedges). The unrealized gains or losses of


6


Table of Contents

 
these contracts are deferred to accumulated other comprehensive loss in the equity section of our Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be included in earnings upon settlement.
 
We have netting arrangements for our exchange traded futures and options contracts and certain over-the-counter (OTC) contracts which are recorded on a net basis in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Although accounting standards permit a party to a master netting arrangement to offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments against the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under the same master netting arrangement, we have not elected to net our margin deposits.
 
As of May 31, 2010 and 2009, we had the following outstanding contracts:
 
                                 
    2010   2009
    Purchase
  Sales
  Purchase
  Sales
    Contracts   Contracts   Contracts   Contracts
    (Units in thousands)
 
Grain and oilseed — bushels
    474,276       696,814       565,847       778,279  
Energy products — barrels
    9,372       11,126       14,270       15,658  
Crop nutrients — tons
    253       426       495       739  
Ocean and barge freight — metric tons
    3,316       2,197       3,229       1,478  
 
As of May 31, 2010, August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, the gross fair values of our derivative assets and liabilities not designated as hedging instruments were as follows:
 
                         
    May 31,
    August 31,
    May 31,
 
    2010     2009     2009  
 
Derivative Assets:
                       
Commodity and freight derivatives
  $ 246,988     $ 296,416     $ 412,148  
Foreign exchange derivatives
                    91  
                         
    $ 246,988     $ 296,416     $ 412,239  
                         
Derivative Liabilities:
                       
Commodity and freight derivatives
  $ 326,235     $ 426,281     $ 483,632  
Foreign exchange derivatives
    1,143               749  
Interest rate derivatives
    2,033       4,911       5,490  
                         
    $ 329,411     $ 431,192     $ 489,871  
                         
 
As of May 31, 2010, the gross fair values of our derivative assets and liabilities designated as cash flow hedging instruments were as follows:
 
         
    May 31,
    2010
 
Derivative Assets:
       
Commodity and freight derivatives
  $ 1,684  


7


Table of Contents

 
For the three-month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, and the nine-month period ended May 31, 2010, the gain (loss) recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were as follows:
 
                             
        Amount of
 
        Gain (Loss)  
        For the Three Months
    For the Nine Months
 
    Location of
  Ended May 31,     Ended May 31,  
    Gain (Loss)   2010     2009     2010  
 
Commodity and freight derivatives
  Cost of goods sold   $ 18,850     $ (38,047 )   $ 50,632  
Foreign exchange derivatives
  Cost of goods sold     (1,197 )     (2,754 )     (1,144 )
Interest rate derivatives
  Interest, net     229       (1,145 )     (779 )
                             
        $ 17,882     $ (41,946 )   $ 48,709  
                             
 
No gains or losses were recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments during the three months or nine months ended May 31, 2010, since there were no settlements. The contracts were entered into during our third quarter of fiscal 2010 and expire in fiscal 2011, with $1.0 million, net of taxes, expected to be included in earnings during the next 12 months. As of May 31, 2010, the unrealized gains deferred to accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:
 
         
    May 31,
    2010
 
Gains included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax expense of $655
  $ 1,029  
 
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill was $16.5 million, $17.3 million and $16.9 million on May 31, 2010, August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, respectively, and is included in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
Intangible assets subject to amortization primarily includes customer lists, trademarks and agreements not to compete, and are amortized over the number of years that approximate their respective useful lives (ranging from 2 to 30 years). Excluding goodwill, the gross carrying amount of our intangible assets was $79.3 million with total accumulated amortization of $37.2 million as of May 31, 2010. Intangible assets of $1.0 million and $26.9 million ($0.1 million non-cash) were acquired during the nine-month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Total amortization expense for intangible assets during the nine-month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, was $8.7 million for each period. The estimated annual amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization for the next five years will approximate $9.8 million annually for the first two years, $6.6 million for the next year and $3.1 million for the following two years.
 
In our Energy segment, major maintenance activities (turnarounds) at our two refineries are accounted for under the deferral method. Turnarounds are the scheduled and required shutdowns of refinery processing units. The costs related to the significant overhaul and refurbishment activities include materials and direct labor costs. The costs of turnarounds are deferred when incurred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of time estimated to lapse until the next turnaround occurs, which is generally 3-4 years. The amortization expense related to turnaround costs are included in cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The selection of the deferral method, as opposed to expensing the turnaround costs when incurred, results in deferring recognition of the turnaround expenditures. The deferral method also results in the classification of the related cash flows as investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, whereas expensing these costs as incurred, would result in classifying the cash outflows as operating activities.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715-20-65-2, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets,” which expands the annual disclosure requirements about fair value measurements of


8


Table of Contents

 
plan assets for pension plans, postretirement medical plans and other funded postretirement plans. ASC 715-20-65-2 will only impact disclosures and is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860-10-65-3, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets,” which requires additional disclosures concerning a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred financial assets. ASC 860-10-65-3 eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements in fiscal 2011.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860-10-65-2, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” which requires an enterprise to conduct a qualitative analysis for the purpose of determining whether, based on its variable interests, it also has a controlling interest in a variable interest entity. ASC 860-10-65-2 clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. ASC 860-10-65-2 requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. It also requires additional disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. ASC 860-10-65-2 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements in fiscal 2011.
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” which amends existing disclosure requirements under ASC 820. ASU No. 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers between Levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy and separate disclosures for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation of activity for Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU also clarifies the existing fair value disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value. ASU No. 2010-06 will only impact disclosures and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures on purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity for Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010.
 
Note 2.   Receivables
 
                         
    May 31,
    August 31,
    May 31,
 
    2010     2009     2009  
 
Trade accounts receivable
  $ 1,640,507     $ 1,482,921     $ 1,680,703  
Cofina Financial notes receivable
    288,560       254,419       386,733  
Other
    201,477       189,434       122,733  
                         
      2,130,544       1,926,774       2,190,169  
Less allowances and reserves
    91,863       99,025       100,256  
                         
    $ 2,038,681     $ 1,827,749     $ 2,089,913  
                         


9


Table of Contents

 
Note 3.   Inventories
 
                         
    May 31,
    August 31,
    May 31,
 
    2010     2009     2009  
 
Grain and oilseed
  $ 644,583     $ 638,622     $ 900,394  
Energy
    569,214       496,114       504,039  
Crop nutrients
    83,332       114,832       175,812  
Feed and farm supplies
    285,839       198,440       346,519  
Processed grain and oilseed
    57,563       69,344       86,712  
Other
    10,048       8,928       9,328  
                         
    $ 1,650,579     $ 1,526,280     $ 2,022,804  
                         
 
At May 31, 2010, we valued approximately 17% of inventories, primarily related to energy, using the lower of cost, determined on the last in first out (LIFO) method, or market (17% and 14% as of August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, respectively). If the first in first out (FIFO) method of accounting had been used, inventories would have been higher than the reported amount by $354.4 million, $311.4 million and $255.0 million at May 31, 2010, August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, respectively.
 
Note 4.   Investments
 
We have a 50% ownership interest in Agriliance LLC (Agriliance), included in our Ag Business segment, and account for our investment using the equity method. Prior to September 1, 2007, Agriliance was a wholesale and retail crop nutrients and crop protection products company. In September 2007, Agriliance distributed the assets of the crop nutrients business to us, and the assets of the crop protection business to Land O’Lakes, Inc., our joint venture partner. Agriliance continues to exist as a 50-50 joint venture and primarily operates and sells agronomy products on a retail basis. As of March 2010, Agriliance has sold most of its retail facilities to various third parties, as well as to us and to Land O’Lakes, with facilities available for repositioning in Florida. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010, we received $105.0 million in cash distributions from Agriliance as a return of capital, primarily from the sale of Agriliance’s retail facilities.
 
During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we invested an additional $4.9 million and $76.3 million, respectively, in Multigrain AG (Multigrain) for its increased capital needs that resulted from expansion of its operations. We have approximately a 40% ownership interest in Multigrain, included in our Ag Business segment, and account for our investment using the equity method.
 
On August 31, 2008, we had a minority ownership interest in VeraSun Energy Corporation (VeraSun), included in our Processing segment. On October 31, 2008, VeraSun filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, we determined an impairment of our investment was necessary based on VeraSun’s market value of $0.28 per share on November 3, 2008, and we recorded an impairment charge and subsequent loss of $70.7 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The impairment did not affect our cash flows and did not have a bearing upon our compliance with any covenants under our credit facilities. Our remaining VeraSun investment of $3.6 million was written off during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 due to the outcome of its bankruptcy.
 
During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we sold our available-for-sale investment of common stock in the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX Holdings) for proceeds of $16.1 million and recorded a pretax gain of $15.7 million.
 
We have a 50% interest in Ventura Foods, LLC, (Ventura Foods), a joint venture which produces and distributes primarily vegetable oil-based products, included in our Processing segment. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we made capital contributions to Ventura Foods of $35.0 million. We account for Ventura Foods as an equity method investment, and as of May 31, 2010, our carrying value of Ventura Foods exceeded our share of their equity by $14.4 million, of which $1.5 million is being amortized with a remaining life of approximately two years. The remaining basis difference represents equity method goodwill. The following provides summarized unaudited financial information for the Ventura Foods balance sheets as of


10


Table of Contents

 
May 31, 2010, August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009 and the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009:
 
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended
    For the Nine Months Ended
 
    May 31,     May 31,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Net sales
  $ 496,622     $ 491,687     $ 1,446,023     $ 1,569,855  
Gross profit
    60,805       93,962       177,462       191,080  
Net income
    25,060       52,669       62,616       81,425  
Net income attributable to CHS Inc. 
    12,530       26,335       31,308       40,713  
 
                         
    May 31,
    August 31,
    May 31,
 
    2010     2009     2009  
 
Current assets
  $ 494,464     $ 441,406     $ 418,311  
Non-current assets
    457,906       464,356       469,500  
Current liabilities
    162,292       141,844       153,342  
Non-current liabilities
    308,015       303,665       305,504  
 
Note 5.   Notes Payable
 
                         
    May 31,
    August 31,
    May 31,
 
    2010     2009     2009  
 
Notes payable
  $ 12,978     $ 19,183     $ 278,447  
Cofina Financial notes payable
    200,833       227,689       276,534  
                         
    $ 213,811     $ 246,872     $ 554,981  
                         
 
As of November 20, 2009, Cofina Funding, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cofina Financial, has an additional $25.0 million available credit under note purchase agreements with various purchasers, through the issuance of short term notes payable ($212.0 million on August 31, 2009).
 
We did not renew our revolving 364-day facility with a committed amount of $300 million that expired in February 2010.
 
In June 2010, we amended our existing five-year revolving credit facility and reduced the committed amount thereunder from $1.3 billion to $700 million. The facility’s maturity date of May 2011 remained the same. In addition, we entered into a new five-year revolving credit facility with a committed amount of $900 million that expires in June 2015. The major financial covenants for both revolving facilities require us to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth, adjusted as defined in the credit agreements, of $2.5 billion and a consolidated funded debt to consolidated cash flow ratio of no greater than 3.00 to 1.00. The term consolidated cash flow is principally our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) with a few other adjustments as defined in the credit agreements.
 
Note 6.   Interest, net
 
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended
    For the Nine Months Ended
 
    May 31,     May 31,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Interest expense
  $ 17,337     $ 20,030     $ 53,131     $ 62,361  
Capitalized interest
    (1,527 )     (1,446 )     (4,578 )     (3,660 )
Interest income
    (1,284 )     (2,272 )     (3,556 )     (8,439 )
                                 
Interest, net
  $ 14,526     $ 16,312     $ 44,997     $ 50,262  
                                 


11


Table of Contents

 
Note 7.   Equities
 
Changes in equity for the nine-month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
 
                 
    Fiscal 2010     Fiscal 2009  
 
CHS Inc. balances, September 1, 2009 and 2008
  $ 3,090,302     $ 2,955,686  
Net income attributable to CHS Inc. 
    348,067       284,100  
Other comprehensive loss
    (1,354 )     (15,916 )
Patronage distribution
    (438,014 )     (643,444 )
Patronage accrued
    426,500       652,000  
Equities retired
    (17,034 )     (40,835 )
Equity retirements accrued
    50,122       90,781  
Equities issued in exchange for elevator properties
    616       6,344  
Preferred stock dividends
    (17,112 )     (14,536 )
Preferred stock dividends accrued
    3,659       3,016  
Accrued dividends and equities payable
    (136,191 )     (105,659 )
Other, net
    6,640       (8,242 )
                 
CHS Inc. balances, May 31, 2010 and 2009
  $ 3,316,201     $ 3,163,295  
                 
Noncontrolling interests balances, September 1, 2009 and 2008
  $ 242,862     $ 205,732  
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    20,122       53,476  
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
    (1,987 )     (18,610 )
Distributions accrued
    1,014       3,762  
Other
    26       3,877  
                 
Noncontrolling interests balances, May 31, 2010 and 2009
  $ 262,037     $ 248,237  
                 
 
During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we redeemed $36.7 million and $49.9 million, respectively, of our capital equity certificates by issuing shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.
 
Note 8.   Comprehensive Income
 
Total comprehensive income was $366.8 million and $321.7 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which included amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $20.1 million and $53.5 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income was $160.9 million and $78.7 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which included amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $14.0 million and $12.0 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income primarily consisted of net income attributable to CHS Inc. during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. On May 31, 2010, August 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, accumulated other comprehensive loss primarily consisted of pension liability adjustments.


12


Table of Contents

 
Note 9.   Employee Benefit Plans
 
Employee benefits information for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
 
                                                 
    Qualified
    Non-Qualified
       
    Pension Benefits     Pension Benefits     Other Benefits  
    2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Components of net periodic benefit costs for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009:
                                               
Service cost
  $ 5,168     $ 4,117     $ 305     $ 309     $ 374     $ 264  
Interest cost
    5,774       5,745       564       611       551       521  
Expected return on plan assets
    (9,220 )     (8,232 )                                
Prior service cost amortization
    548       528       104       137       136       (49 )
Actuarial loss (gain) amortization
    2,655       1,313       149       176       27       (78 )
Transition amount amortization
                                    51       234  
                                                 
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 4,925     $ 3,471     $ 1,122     $ 1,233     $ 1,139     $ 892  
                                                 
Components of net periodic benefit costs for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009:
                                               
Service cost
  $ 15,580     $ 12,239     $ 921     $ 901     $ 1,033     $ 821  
Interest cost
    17,269       17,127       1,706       1,799       1,586       1,642  
Expected return on plan assets
    (27,671 )     (23,340 )                                
Prior service cost amortization
    1,645       1,586       314       410       410       (148 )
Actuarial loss (gain) amortization
    7,926       3,839       467       500       4       (161 )
Transition amount amortization
                                    152       702  
                                                 
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 14,749     $ 11,451     $ 3,408     $ 3,610     $ 3,185     $ 2,856  
                                                 
 
Employer Contributions:
 
Total contributions to be made during fiscal 2010, including the National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA) plan, will depend primarily on market returns on the pension plan assets and minimum funding level requirements. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010, we made no contributions to the pension plans. NCRA does not expect to contribute anything to their pension plan during fiscal 2010.
 
Note 10.   Segment Reporting
 
We have aligned our segments based on an assessment of how our businesses operate and the products and services they sell. Our three business segments: Energy, Ag Business and Processing, create vertical integration to link producers with consumers. Our Energy segment produces and provides primarily for the wholesale distribution of petroleum products and transportation of those products. Our Ag Business segment purchases and resells grains and oilseeds originated by our country operations business, by our member cooperatives and by third parties, and also serves as wholesaler and retailer of crop inputs. Our Processing segment converts grains and oilseeds into value-added products. Corporate and Other primarily represents our business solutions operations, which consists of commodities hedging, insurance and financial services related to crop production.
 
Corporate administrative expenses are allocated to all three business segments, and Corporate and Other, based on direct usage for services that can be tracked, such as information technology and legal, and other factors or considerations relevant to the costs incurred.
 
Many of our business activities are highly seasonal and operating results will vary throughout the year. Historically, our income is generally lowest during the second fiscal quarter and highest during the third fiscal quarter. Our business segments are subject to varying seasonal fluctuations. For example, in our Ag Business


13


Table of Contents

 
segment, agronomy and country operations businesses experience higher volumes and income during the spring planting season and in the fall, which corresponds to harvest. Also in our Ag Business segment, our grain marketing operations are subject to fluctuations in volumes and earnings based on producer harvests, world grain prices and demand. Our Energy segment generally experiences higher volumes and profitability in certain operating areas, such as refined products, in the summer and early fall when gasoline and diesel fuel usage is highest and is subject to global supply and demand forces. Other energy products, such as propane, may experience higher volumes and profitability during the winter heating and crop drying seasons.
 
Our revenues, assets and cash flows can be significantly affected by global market prices for commodities such as petroleum products, natural gas, grains, oilseeds, crop nutrients and flour. Changes in market prices for commodities that we purchase without a corresponding change in the selling prices of those products can affect revenues and operating earnings. Commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including the weather, crop damage due to disease or insects, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulations and policies, world events, and general political and economic conditions.
 
While our revenues and operating results are derived from businesses and operations which are wholly-owned and majority-owned, a portion of our business operations are conducted through companies in which we hold ownership interests of 50% or less and do not control the operations. We account for these investments primarily using the equity method of accounting, wherein we record our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity as equity income from investments, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. These investments principally include our 50% ownership in each of the following companies: Agriliance LLC (Agriliance), TEMCO, LLC (TEMCO) and United Harvest, LLC (United Harvest), and our approximately 40% ownership in Multigrain S.A., included in our Ag Business segment; and our 50% ownership in Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods) and our 24% ownerships in Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon Milling) and Horizon Milling G.P., included in our Processing segment.
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CHS and all of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and limited liability companies, including NCRA in our Energy segment. The effects of all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
 
Reconciling Amounts represent the elimination of revenues between segments. Such transactions are executed at market prices to more accurately evaluate the profitability of the individual business segments.


14


Table of Contents

 
Segment information for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
 
                                                 
          Ag
          Corporate
    Reconciling
       
    Energy     Business     Processing     and Other     Amounts     Total  
 
For the Three Months Ended May 31, 2010
                                               
Revenues
  $ 2,170,778     $ 4,213,640     $ 258,367     $ 10,820     $ (77,627 )   $ 6,575,978  
Cost of goods sold
    2,063,829       4,084,233       254,672       (1,107 )     (77,627 )     6,324,000  
                                                 
Gross profit
    106,949       129,407       3,695       11,927             251,978  
Marketing, general and administrative
    30,767       47,819       6,777       10,661               96,024  
                                                 
Operating earnings (losses)
    76,182       81,588       (3,082 )     1,266             155,954  
Gain on investments
            (10,012 )             (356 )             (10,368 )
Interest, net
    3,656       6,000       5,161       (291 )             14,526  
Equity income from investments
    (1,549 )     (9,019 )     (18,882 )     (232 )             (29,682 )
                                                 
Income before income taxes
  $ 74,075     $ 94,619     $ 10,639     $ 2,145     $     $ 181,478  
                                                 
Intersegment revenues
  $ (72,255 )   $ (5,094 )   $ (278 )           $ 77,627     $  
                                                 
For the Three Months Ended May 31, 2009
                                               
Revenues
  $ 1,564,568     $ 4,388,338     $ 252,067     $ 11,630     $ (53,484 )   $ 6,163,119  
Cost of goods sold
    1,482,775       4,326,980       249,437       (857 )     (53,484 )     6,004,851  
                                                 
Gross profit
    81,793       61,358       2,630       12,487             158,268  
Marketing, general and administrative
    31,876       38,704       6,667       13,170               90,417  
                                                 
Operating earnings (losses)
    49,917       22,654       (4,037 )     (683 )           67,851  
Loss on investments
            112       3,614                       3,726  
Interest, net
    (67 )     10,285       8,337       (2,243 )             16,312  
Equity income from investments
    (1,079 )     (11,396 )     (30,197 )     (313 )             (42,985 )
                                                 
Income before income taxes
  $ 51,063     $ 23,653     $ 14,209     $ 1,873     $     $ 90,798  
                                                 
Intersegment revenues
  $ (48,384 )   $ (4,533 )   $ (567 )           $ 53,484     $  
                                                 
For the Nine Months Ended May 31, 2010
                                               
Revenues
  $ 6,472,886     $ 11,595,989     $ 786,969     $ 31,925     $ (238,057 )   $ 18,649,712  
Cost of goods sold
    6,276,720       11,238,883       754,589       (3,787 )     (238,057 )     18,028,348  
                                                 
Gross profit
    196,166       357,106       32,380       35,712             621,364  
Marketing, general and administrative
    87,782       132,010       18,657       30,136               268,585  
                                                 
Operating earnings
    108,384       225,096       13,723       5,576             352,779  
Gain on investments
            (23,787 )             (356 )             (24,143 )
Interest, net
    7,515       19,860       14,921       2,701               44,997  
Equity income from investments
    (3,845 )     (27,400 )     (48,793 )     (744 )             (80,782 )
                                                 
Income before income taxes
  $ 104,714     $ 256,423     $ 47,595     $ 3,975     $     $ 412,707  
                                                 
Intersegment revenues
  $ (221,699 )   $ (14,735 )   $ (1,623 )           $ 238,057     $  
                                                 
Goodwill
  $ 1,166     $ 8,465             $ 6,898             $ 16,529  
                                                 
Capital expenditures
  $ 139,504     $ 90,192     $ 4,651     $ 3,130             $ 237,477  
                                                 
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 88,700     $ 43,741     $ 12,714     $ 6,448             $ 151,603  
                                                 
Total identifiable assets at May 31, 2010
  $ 2,941,232     $ 3,185,137     $ 651,300     $ 914,839             $ 7,692,508  
                                                 
For the Nine Months Ended May 31, 2009
                                               
Revenues
  $ 5,661,267     $ 12,758,575     $ 833,585     $ 35,209     $ (214,529 )   $ 19,074,107  
Cost of goods sold
    5,229,906       12,563,133       804,056       (2,211 )     (214,529 )     18,380,355  
                                                 
Gross profit
    431,361       195,442       29,529       37,420             693,752  
Marketing, general and administrative
    93,369       125,812       20,946       37,004               277,131  
                                                 
Operating earnings
    337,992       69,630       8,583       416             416,621  
(Gain) loss on investments
    (15,748 )     (2,889 )     74,338                       55,701  
Interest, net
    5,110       33,718       15,442       (4,008 )             50,262  
Equity income from investments
    (2,906 )     (18,501 )     (51,936 )     (753 )             (74,096 )
                                                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
  $ 351,536     $ 57,302     $ (29,261 )   $ 5,177     $     $ 384,754  
                                                 
Intersegment revenues
  $ (189,989 )   $ (22,644 )   $ (1,896 )           $ 214,529     $  
                                                 
Goodwill
  $ 1,983     $ 8,065             $ 6,898             $ 16,946  
                                                 
Capital expenditures
  $ 170,373     $ 47,929     $ 5,684     $ 1,902             $ 225,888  
                                                 
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 87,404     $ 38,889     $ 12,503     $ 5,887             $ 144,683  
                                                 
Total identifiable assets at May 31, 2009
  $ 2,681,788     $ 3,842,218     $ 691,711     $ 1,154,712             $ 8,370,429  
                                                 


15


Table of Contents

 
Note 11.   Fair Value Measurements
 
The following table presents assets and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet that are recognized at fair value on a recurring basis, and indicates the fair value hierarchy utilized to determine such fair value. As required by accounting standards, assets and liabilities are classified, in their entirety, based on the lowest level of input that is a significant component of the fair value measurement. The lowest level of input is considered Level 3. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the classification of fair value assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy levels. Fair value measurements at May 31, 2010 were as follows:
 
                                 
    Fair Value Measurements  
    Quoted Prices in
          Significant
       
    Active Markets for
    Significant Other
    Unobservable
       
    Identical Assets
    Observable Inputs
    Inputs
       
    (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total  
 
Assets:
                               
Readily marketable inventories
          $ 702,146             $ 702,146  
Commodity and freight derivatives
  $ 18,226       84,970               103,196  
Other assets
    56,801                       56,801  
                                 
Total Assets
  $ 75,027     $ 787,116             $ 862,143  
                                 
Liabilities:
                               
Commodity, freight and foreign currency derivatives
  $ 15,812     $ 166,090             $ 181,902  
Interest rate swap derivatives
            2,033               2,033  
                                 
Total Liabilities
  $ 15,812     $ 168,123             $ 183,935  
                                 
 
Readily marketable inventories  — Our readily marketable inventories primarily include our grain and oilseed inventories that are stated at fair values. These commodities are readily marketable, have quoted market prices and may be sold without significant additional processing. We estimate the fair market values of these inventories included in Level 2 primarily based on exchange quoted prices, adjusted for differences in local markets. Changes in the fair market values of these inventories are recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of cost of goods sold.
 
Commodity, freight and foreign currency derivatives  — Exchange traded futures and options contracts are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1. Our forward commodity purchase and sales contracts, flat price or basis fixed derivative contracts, ocean freight contracts and other OTC derivatives are determined using inputs that are generally based on exchange traded prices and/or recent market bids and offers, adjusted for location specific inputs, and are classified within Level 2. The location specific inputs are generally broker or dealer quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or OTC markets. Changes in the fair values of contracts not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes are recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of cost of goods sold. Changes in the fair values of contracts designated as cash flow hedging instruments are deferred to accumulated other comprehensive loss in the equity section of our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are included in earnings upon settlement.
 
Other assets  — Our available-for-sale investments in common stock of other companies and our Rabbi Trust assets are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices on active exchanges and are classified within Level 1. Changes in the fair market values of these other assets are primarily recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of marketing, general and administrative expenses.
 
Interest rate swap derivatives  — Fair values of our interest rate swap liabilities are determined utilizing valuation models that are widely accepted in the market to value such OTC derivative contracts. The specific terms of the contracts, as well as market observable inputs such as interest rates and credit risk assumptions,


16


Table of Contents

 
are input into the models. As all significant inputs are market observable, all interest rate swaps are classified within Level 2. Changes in the fair market values of these interest rate swap derivatives are recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of interest, net.
 
The table below represents a reconciliation at May 31, 2010, for assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). This consisted of our short-term investments representing an enhanced cash fund at NCRA that was closed due to credit-market turmoil.
 
                 
    Level 3 Short-Term
 
    Investments  
    2010     2009  
 
Balances, September 1, 2009 and 2008
  $ 1,932     $ 7,154  
Gains (losses) included in marketing, general and administrative expense
    38       (908 )
Settlements
    (1,970 )     (3,836 )
                 
Balances, May 31, 2010 and 2009
  $     $ 2,410  
                 
 
Note 12.   Commitments and Contingencies
 
Guarantees
 
We are a guarantor for lines of credit and performance obligations of related companies. As of May 31, 2010, our bank covenants allowed maximum guarantees of $500.0 million, of which $17.1 million was outstanding. We have collateral for a portion of these contingent obligations. We have not recorded a liability related to the contingent obligations as we do not expect to pay out any cash related to them, and the fair values are considered immaterial. All outstanding loans with respective creditors are current as of May 31, 2010.


17


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
General
 
The following discussions of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim financial statements and notes to such statements and the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements found at the beginning of Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended August 31, 2009, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections of management. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, as more fully described in the cautionary statement and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
 
CHS Inc. (CHS, we or us) is a diversified company, which provides grain, foods and energy resources to businesses and consumers on a global basis. As a cooperative, we are owned by farmers, ranchers and their member cooperatives across the United States. We also have preferred stockholders that own shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.
 
We provide a full range of production agricultural inputs such as refined fuels, propane, farm supplies, animal nutrition and agronomy products, as well as services, which include hedging, financing and insurance services. We own and operate petroleum refineries and pipelines, and market and distribute refined fuels and other energy products, under the Cenex ® brand through a network of member cooperatives and independents. We purchase grains and oilseeds directly and indirectly from agricultural producers primarily in the midwestern and western United States. These grains and oilseeds are either sold to domestic and international customers, or further processed into a variety of grain-based food products.
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CHS and all of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and limited liability companies, including National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA) in our Energy segment. The effects of all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
 
We operate three segments: Energy, Ag Business and Processing. Together, these segments create vertical integration to link producers with consumers. Our Energy segment produces and provides for the wholesale distribution of petroleum products and transports those products. Our Ag Business segment purchases and resells grains and oilseeds originated by our country operations business, by our member cooperatives and by third parties, and also serves as wholesaler and retailer of crop inputs. Our Processing segment converts grains and oilseeds into value-added products. Corporate and Other primarily represents our business solutions operations, which consists of commodities hedging, insurance and financial services related to crop production.
 
Corporate administrative expenses are allocated to all three business segments, and Corporate and Other, based on direct usage for services that can be tracked, such as information technology and legal, and other factors or considerations relevant to the costs incurred.
 
Many of our business activities are highly seasonal and operating results will vary throughout the year. Overall, our income is generally lowest during the second fiscal quarter and highest during the third fiscal quarter. Our business segments are subject to varying seasonal fluctuations. For example, in our Ag Business segment, our retail agronomy, crop nutrients and country operations businesses generally experience higher volumes and income during the spring planting season and in the fall, which corresponds to harvest. Also in our Ag Business segment, our grain marketing operations are subject to fluctuations in volume and earnings based on producer harvests, world grain prices and demand. Our Energy segment generally experiences higher volumes and profitability in certain operating areas, such as refined products, in the summer and early fall when gasoline and diesel fuel usage is highest and is subject to global supply and demand forces. Other energy products, such as propane, may experience higher volumes and profitability during the winter heating and crop drying seasons.


18


Table of Contents

Our revenues, assets and cash flows can be significantly affected by global market prices for commodities such as petroleum products, natural gas, grains, oilseeds, crop nutrients and flour. Changes in market prices for commodities that we purchase without a corresponding change in the selling prices of those products can affect revenues and operating earnings. Commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including the weather, crop damage due to disease or insects, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulations and policies, world events, and general political and economic conditions.
 
While our revenues and operating results are derived from businesses and operations which are wholly-owned and majority-owned, a portion of our business operations are conducted through companies in which we hold ownership interests of 50% or less and do not control the operations. We account for these investments primarily using the equity method of accounting, wherein we record our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity as equity income from investments, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. These investments principally include our 50% ownership in each of the following companies: Agriliance LLC (Agriliance), TEMCO, LLC (TEMCO) and United Harvest, LLC (United Harvest), and our approximately 40% ownership in Multigrain S.A., included in our Ag Business segment; and our 50% ownership in Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods) and our 24% ownerships in Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon Milling) and Horizon Milling G.P., included in our Processing segment.
 
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860-10-65-1, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51.” ASC 860-10-65-1 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require: the ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheets within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; the amount of consolidated net earnings attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statements of operations; and changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted for consistently.
 
We adopted ASC 860-10-65-1 at the beginning of fiscal 2010. In accordance with the accounting guidance, in order to conform to the current period presentation, we made reclassifications within our Consolidated Statements of Operations to net income to present the income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a reconciling item between net income and net income attributable to CHS Inc. Also, noncontrolling interests previously reported as minority interests have been reclassified to a separate section in equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, certain other reclassifications to our previously reported financial information have been made to conform to the current period presentation.
 
Results of Operations
 
Comparison of the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009
 
General.   We recorded income before income taxes of $181.5 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $90.8 million during the three months ended May 31, 2009, an increase of $90.7 million (100%). Operating results reflected higher pretax earnings in our Ag Business and Energy segments and Corporate and Other, which were partially offset by decreased pretax earnings in our Processing segment.
 
Our Energy segment generated income before income taxes of $74.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $51.1 million in the three months ended May 31, 2009. This increase in earnings of $23.0 million is primarily from improved margins on refined fuels at both our Laurel, Montana refinery and our NCRA refinery in McPherson, Kansas. Earnings in our lubricants, renewable fuels marketing and transportation businesses improved, while our propane and equipment businesses experienced lower earnings during the three months ended May 31, 2010 when compared to the same three-month period of the previous year.


19


Table of Contents

Our Ag Business segment generated income before income taxes of $94.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $23.7 million in the three months ended May 31, 2009, an increase in earnings of $70.9 million. Earnings from our wholesale crop nutrients business improved $39.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal 2009. The market prices for crop nutrients products fell significantly during most of our fiscal 2009 as fertilizer prices, an input to grain production, followed some of the declining grain prices. Late fall of calendar 2008 rains impeded the application of fertilizer during that time period, and as a result, we had a higher quantity of inventories on hand at the end of our first and second fiscal quarters of 2009 than is typical at that time of year. Because there are no future contracts or other derivative instruments that can be used to hedge fertilizer inventories and contracts effectively, a long inventory position with falling prices creates losses. From time to time, crop nutrients hedge some positions in over-the-counter (OTC) swaps. Depreciation in fertilizer prices continued throughout the third quarter of our fiscal 2009, which had the affect of dramatically reducing gross margins on this product. To reflect our wholesale crop nutrients inventories at net-realizable values, we recorded lower-of-cost or market adjustments of approximately $83 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2009, of which $8.2 million was remaining at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The price fluctuations for the nine months of fiscal 2010 were far less volatile and we carried less unhedged positions as well, which has the effect of reducing the potential for both large earnings and large losses. Also during the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we recorded a $10.0 million gain related to the sale of many of our Agriliance locations, an agronomy joint venture in which we hold a 50% interest. This, along with improved financial performance by Agriliance, resulted in a $10.9 million combined increase in earnings, net of allocated internal expenses. Our country operations earnings increased $30.3 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of improved retail crop nutrient and processed sunflower margins, in addition to overall increased margins related to higher volume, primarily attributed to acquisitions made over the past year. Our grain marketing earnings decreased by $10.1 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal 2009, primarily as a result of increased international expenses, coupled with reduced joint venture earnings, partially offset by improved margins and volumes on grain.
 
Our Processing segment generated income before income taxes of $10.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $14.2 million in the three months ended May 31, 2009, a decrease in earnings of $3.6 million. Our share of earnings from Ventura Foods, our packaged foods joint venture, net of allocated internal expenses, decreased by $16.2 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the same period of the prior year. Gross margins were extremely strong in 2009 for Ventura Foods because of rapidly declining ingredient costs, and as these costs stabilized, gross margins have returned to a more normal level. Our share of earnings from our wheat milling joint ventures, net of allocated internal expenses, increased by $2.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of improved margins on the products sold. Oilseed processing earnings increased by $1.2 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to improved crushing margins, partially offset by lower refining margins. During the three-month period ended May 31, 2009, we reflected a $9.3 million loss, net of allocated internal expenses on our investment in VeraSun, including a loss of $3.6 million for the final write-off of our remaining investment in VeraSun, an ethanol manufacturer who declared bankruptcy in October, 2008.
 
Corporate and Other generated income before income taxes of $2.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $1.9 million in the three months ended May 31, 2009, an increase in earnings of $0.2 million.
 
Net Income attributable to CHS Inc.   Consolidated net income attributable to CHS Inc. for the three months ended May 31, 2010 was $145.4 million compared to $64.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009, which represents an $80.8 million increase.
 
Revenues.   Consolidated revenues were $6.6 billion for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $6.2 billion for the three months ended May 31, 2009, which represents a $0.4 billion (7%) increase.


20


Table of Contents

Total revenues include other revenues generated primarily within our Ag Business segment and Corporate and Other. Our Ag Business segment’s country operations elevators and agri-service centers derive other revenues from activities related to production agriculture, which include grain storage, grain cleaning, fertilizer spreading, crop protection spraying and other services of this nature, and our grain marketing operations receive other revenues at our export terminals from activities related to loading vessels. Corporate and Other derives revenues primarily from our financing, hedging and insurance operations.
 
Our Energy segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $2.1 billion increased by $582.3 million (38%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. During the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, our Energy segment recorded revenues from our Ag Business segment of $72.3 million and $48.4 million, respectively. The net increase in revenues of $582.3 million is comprised of a net increase of $524.2 million related to higher prices on refined fuels and renewable fuels marketing products, in addition to $58.1 million related to a net increase in sales volume. Refined fuels revenues increased $359.5 million (34%), of which $416.3 million was related to a net average selling price increase, partially offset by $56.8 million, which was attributable to decreased volumes, compared to the same period in the previous year. The sales price of refined fuels increased $0.67 per gallon (42%), while volumes decreased 5%, mainly from the impact on the global economy with less transport diesel usage, when comparing the three months ended May 31, 2010 with the same period a year ago. Propane revenues decreased $11.7 million (12%), of which $17.8 million was due to a decrease in volume, partially offset by $6.1 million related an increase in the net average selling price, when compared to the same period in the previous year. The average selling price of propane increased $0.08 per gallon (8%), while sales volume decreased 18% in comparison to the same period of the prior year. Renewable fuels marketing revenues increased $129.0 million (102%), mostly from a 100% increase in volumes, coupled with an increase in the average selling price of $0.01 per gallon (1%), when compared with the same three-month period in the previous year.
 
Our Ag Business segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $4.2 billion, decreased $0.2 billion (4%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. Grain revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $2.8 billion and $3.0 billion during the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Of the grain revenues decrease of $135.5 million (5%), $564.4 million is due to decreased average grain selling prices, partially offset by $428.9 million due to a 15% net increase in volumes, during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period last fiscal year. The average sales price of all grain and oilseed commodities sold reflected a decrease of $1.20 per bushel (17%) over the same three-month period in fiscal 2009. The average month-end market price per bushel of spring wheat, soybeans and corn decreased approximately $1.93, $1.13 and $0.56, respectively, when compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. Wheat, corn and soybeans all had increased volumes compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009.
 
Wholesale crop nutrient revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $578.4 million and $675.9 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Of the wholesale crop nutrient revenues decrease of $97.5 million (14%), $167.7 million was due to decreased average fertilizer selling prices, partially offset by $70.2 million related to increased volumes, during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period last fiscal year. The average sales price of all fertilizers sold reflected a decrease of $98 per ton (22%) over the same three-month period in fiscal 2009. Our wholesale crop nutrient volumes increased 10% during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared with the same period of a year ago, mainly due to the reduced sales related to higher fertilizer prices during a falling market in the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared to the same period in fiscal 2010.
 
Our Ag Business segment non-grain or non-wholesale crop nutrients product revenues of $762.9 million increased by $59.4 million (8%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009, primarily the result of increased revenues in our country operations business of retail seed, energy and crop protection products, partially offset by decreases in feed and sunflower products. Other revenues within our Ag Business segment of $44.4 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 decreased $1.7 million (4%) compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009.


21


Table of Contents

Our Processing segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $258.1 million increased $6.6 million (3%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. Because our wheat milling and packaged foods operations are operated through non-consolidated joint ventures, revenues reported in our Processing segment are entirely from our oilseed processing operations. Our oilseed processing operation net revenues increased $6.6 million, primarily from increased volumes, partially offset by a decrease in the average selling price of our oilseed products, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. Typically, changes in average selling prices of oilseed products are primarily driven by the average market prices of soybeans.
 
Cost of Goods Sold.   Consolidated cost of goods sold were $6.3 billion for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $6.0 billion for the three months ended May 31, 2009, which represents a $0.3 billion (5%) increase.
 
Our Energy segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $2.0 billion increased by $557.2 million (39%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in cost of goods sold is primarily due to increased per unit costs for refined fuels products. Specifically, refined fuels cost of goods sold increased $337.5 million (33%) which reflects an increase in the average cost of refined fuels of $0.63 per gallon (40%); while volumes decreased 5% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. On average, we process approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day at our Laurel, Montana refinery and 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day at NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. The average cost increase is primarily related to higher input costs at our two crude oil refineries and higher average prices on the refined products that we purchased for resale compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. The aggregate average per unit cost of crude oil purchased for the two refineries increased 45% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. The cost of propane decreased $12.3 million (13%) mostly from an 18% decrease in volumes, partially offset by an average cost increase of $0.06 per gallon (6%), when compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. Renewable fuels marketing costs increased $127.3 million (102%), mostly from a 100% increase in volumes, in addition to an increase in the average cost of $0.01 per gallon (1%), when compared with the same three-month period in the previous year.
 
Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $4.1 billion, decreased $243.3 million (6%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period of the prior year. Grain cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $2.8 billion and $2.9 billion during the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The cost of grains and oilseed procured through our Ag Business segment decreased $115.7 million (4%) compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. This is primarily the result of a $1.13 (16%) decrease in the average cost per bushel, partially offset by a 15% net increase in bushels sold, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The average month-end market price per bushel of spring wheat, soybeans and corn decreased compared to the same three-month period a year ago.
 
Wholesale crop nutrients cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $550.5 million and $685.5 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net decrease of $135.0 million (20%) is comprised of a decrease in the average cost per ton of fertilizer of $121 (27%), partially offset by increases in tons sold of 10%, when compared to the same three-month period in the prior year.
 
Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, excluding the cost of grains and wholesale crop nutrients procured through this segment, increased $34.7 million (6%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to net higher input commodity prices, along with increases due to volumes generated from acquisitions made and reflected in previous reporting periods.
 
Our Processing segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $254.4 million increased $5.5 million (2%) compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009, which was primarily due to increased volumes of oilseed refined and processed products.
 
Marketing, General and Administrative.   Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $96.0 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 increased by $5.6 million (6%) compared to the three months ended


22


Table of Contents

May 31, 2009. This net increase includes expansion of foreign operations and acquisitions, partially offset by reduced accruals for variable pay in many of our business operations and Corporate and Other.
 
(Gain) loss on Investments.   During the three months ended May 31, 2010, we recorded a net gain on investments of $10.4 million, of which $10.0 million relates to the cash received for the sales of many of our remaining Agriliance facilities, included in our Ag Business segment and a $0.4 million gain, included in Corporate and Other. During the three months ended May 31, 2009, we recorded a net loss on investments of $3.7 million, which reflects a loss of $3.6 million for the final write-off on our VeraSun investment, reflected in our Processing segment, and a $0.1 million loss in our Ag Business segment.
 
Interest, net.   Net interest of $14.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 decreased $1.8 million (11%) compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. Interest expense for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 was $17.3 million and $20.0 million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense of $2.7 million (13%) primarily relates to the principal payments on our long-term debt in the past 12 months. In addition, the average level of short-term borrowings decreased $182.7 million (51%) during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, mostly due to significantly reduced working capital needs resulting from lower commodity prices. For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we capitalized interest of $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, primarily related to construction projects at both refineries in our Energy segment. Interest income, generated primarily from marketable securities, was $1.3 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net decrease in interest income of $1.0 million (44%) was mostly within Corporate and Other, which primarily relates to marketable securities with interest yields lower than a year ago.
 
Equity Income from Investments.   Equity income from investments of $30.0 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 decreased $13.3 million (31%) compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. We record equity income or loss from the investments in which we have an ownership interest of 50% or less and have significant influence, but not control, for our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net decrease in equity income from investments was attributable to reduced earnings from investments in our Processing and Ag Business segments and Corporate and Other of $11.3 million, $2.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and was partially offset by improved equity investment earnings in our Energy segment of $0.5 million.
 
Our Ag Business segment generated reduced equity investment earnings of $2.4 million. Our share of equity investment earnings or losses in agronomy decreased earnings by $0.2 million and reflects slightly reduced retail margins. We had a net decrease of $2.6 million from our share of equity investment earnings in our grain marketing joint ventures during the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period the previous year, which is primarily related to decreased margins in an international investment, partially offset by improved export margins. Our country operations business reported an aggregate increase in equity investment earnings of $0.4 million from several small equity investments.
 
Our Processing segment generated reduced equity investment earnings of $11.3 million. We recorded reduced earnings for Ventura Foods, our vegetable oil-based products and packaged foods joint venture, of $13.8 million compared to the same three-month period in fiscal 2009. Gross margins were extremely strong in 2009 for Ventura Foods because of rapidly declining ingredient costs, and as these costs stabilized, gross margins have returned to a more normal level. We recorded improved earnings for Horizon Milling, our domestic and Canadian wheat milling joint ventures, of $2.5 million, net. Volatility in the grain markets created wheat procurement opportunities, which increased margins for Horizon Milling during fiscal 2010 compared to the same three-month period in fiscal 2009.
 
Our Energy segment generated improved equity investment earnings of $0.5 million related to an equity investment held by NCRA.
 
Corporate and Other generated reduced earnings of $0.1 million from equity investment earnings, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009.


23


Table of Contents

Income Taxes.   Income tax expense of $22.0 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 compared with $14.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009, resulting in effective tax rates of 12.1% and 15.7%, respectively. The federal and state statutory rate applied to nonpatronage business activity was 38.9% for the three-month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. The income taxes and effective tax rate vary each year based upon profitability and nonpatronage business activity during each of the comparable years.
 
Noncontrolling Interests.   Noncontrolling interests of $14.0 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 increased by $2.0 million (17%) compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. This net increase was a result of more profitable operations within our majority-owned subsidiaries. Substantially all noncontrolling interests relate to NCRA, an approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary, which we consolidate in our Energy segment.
 
Comparison of the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009
 
General.   We recorded income before income taxes of $412.7 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $384.8 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2009, an increase of $27.9 million (7%). Included in the results for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 was a $23.7 million gain related to the sale of many of the Agriliance southern locations, and for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 was a $74.3 million loss from our VeraSun investment. Operating results reflected higher pretax earnings in our Ag Business and Processing segments, which were partially offset by decreased pretax earnings in our Energy segment and Corporate and Other.
 
Our Energy segment generated income before income taxes of $104.7 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $351.5 million in the nine months ended May 31, 2009. This decrease in earnings of $246.8 million is primarily due to significantly lower margins on refined fuels at both our Laurel, Montana refinery and our NCRA refinery in McPherson, Kansas. Also, in our first quarter of fiscal 2009, we sold all of our 180,000 shares of NYMEX Holdings stock for proceeds of $16.1 million and recorded a pretax gain of $15.7 million. Earnings in our lubricants, propane, renewable fuels marketing and transportation businesses improved, while our equipment business experienced lower earnings during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 when compared to the same nine-month period of the previous year.
 
Our Ag Business segment generated income before income taxes of $256.4 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $57.3 million in the nine months ended May 31, 2009, an increase in earnings of $199.1 million. Earnings from our wholesale crop nutrients business improved $117.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal 2009. The market prices for crop nutrients products fell significantly during the first nine months of our fiscal 2009 as fertilizer prices, an input to grain production, followed some of the declining grain prices. Late fall of calendar 2008 rains impeded the application of fertilizer during that time period, and as a result, we had a higher quantity of inventories on hand at the end of our first fiscal quarter 2009 than is typical at that time of year. Because there are no future contracts or other derivative instruments that can be used to hedge fertilizer inventories and contracts effectively, a long inventory position with falling prices creates losses. From time to time, crop nutrients hedge some positions in OTC swaps. Depreciation in fertilizer prices continued throughout the second and third quarters of our fiscal 2009, which had the effect of dramatically reducing gross margins on this product. To reflect our wholesale crop nutrients inventories at net-realizable values, we recorded lower-of-cost or market adjustments of approximately $83 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2009, of which $8.2 million was remaining at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The price fluctuations for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were far less volatile and we carried lower unhedged positions as well, which has the effect of reducing both the potential for large earnings or large losses. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010, we recorded a gain related to the sales of many of the southern locations of Agriliance of $23.7 million. In addition, Agriliance saw improved margins during fiscal 2010, partially offset by reduced earnings from a Canadian equity investment that was sold during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Combined agronomy equity investments resulted in a $36.1 million net increase in earnings, net of allocated internal expenses. Our grain marketing earnings increased by $4.8 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared with the same nine-month period in fiscal 2009, primarily from improved margins as a result of higher grain volumes, partially offset by reduced earnings from our grain joint ventures. Our country operations earnings increased


24


Table of Contents

$41.0 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of improved margins from higher grain volumes, in addition to overall increased margins mostly from acquisitions and improved retail crop nutrient margins.
 
Our Processing segment generated income before income taxes of $47.6 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to a net loss of $29.3 million in the nine months ended May 31, 2009, an increase in earnings of $76.9 million. During the nine-month period ended May 31, 2009, we reflected a $74.3 million loss ($82.0 million, including allocated internal expenses) on our investment in VeraSun, an ethanol manufacturer who declared bankruptcy in October, 2008. Oilseed processing earnings increased $4.6 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to improved crushing margins and volumes, partially offset by reduced margins in our refining operations. Our share of earnings from our wheat milling joint ventures, net of allocated internal expenses, increased by $4.8 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of improved margins on the products sold. Our share of earnings from Ventura Foods, our packaged foods joint venture, net of allocated internal expenses, decreased by $14.5 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. Gross margins were extremely strong in 2009 for Ventura Foods because of rapidly declining ingredient costs, and as these costs stabilized, gross margins have returned to a more normal level.
 
Corporate and Other generated income before income taxes of $4.0 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $5.2 million in the nine months ended May 31, 2009, a decrease in earnings of $1.2 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to reduced revenues from our insurance services, partially offset by improved revenues in our hedging and financial services.
 
Net Income attributable to CHS Inc.   Consolidated net income attributable to CHS Inc. for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 was $348.1 million compared to $284.1 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009, which represents a $64.0 million (23%) increase.
 
Revenues.   Consolidated revenues were $18.6 billion for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $19.1 billion for the nine months ended May 31, 2009, which represents a $0.5 billion (2%) decrease.
 
Total revenues include other revenues generated primarily within our Ag Business segment and Corporate and Other. Our Ag Business segment’s country operations elevators and agri-service centers derive other revenues from activities related to production agriculture, which include grain storage, grain cleaning, fertilizer spreading, crop protection spraying and other services of this nature, and our grain marketing operations receive other revenues at our export terminals from activities related to loading vessels. Corporate and Other derives revenues primarily from our financing, hedging and insurance operations.
 
Our Energy segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $6.3 billion increased by $779.9 million (14%) during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, our Energy segment recorded revenues from our Ag Business segment of $221.7 million and $190.0 million, respectively. The net increase in revenues of $779.9 million is comprised of $205.0 million related to a net increase in sales volume and $574.9 million related to higher prices on refined fuels and renewable fuels marketing products. Refined fuels revenues increased $192.4 million (5%), of which $475.4 million was related to an increase in the net average selling price, partially offset by $283.0 million which was attributable to decreased volumes, compared to the same period in the previous year. While the sales price of refined fuels increased $0.26 per gallon (14%), volumes decreased 8%, mainly from the impact on the global economy with less transport diesel usage, when comparing the nine months ended May 31, 2010 with the same period a year ago. Propane revenues decreased $35.0 million (5%), of which $100.4 million was due to a decrease in the net average selling price, partially offset by $65.4 million related to an increase in volumes, when compared to the same period in the previous year. The average selling price of propane decreased $0.18 per gallon (13%), while sales volume increased 10% in comparison to the same period of the prior year. The increase in propane volumes primarily reflects increased demand including an improved crop drying season and an earlier home heating season. Renewable fuels marketing revenues increased $425.7 million (109%), mostly from a 102% increase in volumes, in


25


Table of Contents

addition to an increase in the average selling price of $0.06 per gallon (3%), when compared with the same nine-month period in the previous year.
 
Our Ag Business segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $11.6 billion, decreased $1.2 billion (9%) during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. Grain revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $8.9 billion and $9.5 billion during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Of the grain revenues decrease of $657.5 million (7%), $1.9 billion is attributable to decreased average grain selling prices, partially offset by $1.2 billion, which is due to a 13% increase in volumes during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period last fiscal year. The average sales price of all grain and oilseed commodities sold reflected a decrease of $1.30 per bushel (17%) over the same nine-month period in fiscal 2009. The average month-end market price per bushel of spring wheat, corn and soybeans decreased approximately $1.54, $0.31 and $0.16, respectively, when compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. Wheat, corn and soybean volumes increased, while barley reflected a decrease compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009.
 
Wholesale crop nutrient revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $1.2 billion and $1.6 billion during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Of the wholesale crop nutrient revenues decrease of $436.8 million (27%), $553.2 million is due to decreased average fertilizer selling prices, partially offset by $116.4 million, which was attributable to increased volumes, during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period last fiscal year. The average sales price of all fertilizers sold reflected a decrease of $153 per ton (32%) over the same nine-month period in fiscal 2009. Volumes increased 7% during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared with the same period of a year ago.
 
Our Ag Business segment non-grain or non-wholesale crop nutrients product revenues of $1.4 billion decreased by $59.3 million (4%) during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009, primarily the result of decreased revenues in our country operations business of retail crop nutrients and feed products, partially offset by increased revenues from our seed, crop protection and energy products. Other revenues within our Ag Business segment of $135.6 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 decreased $1.0 million (1%) compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009.
 
Our Processing segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $785.3 million decreased $46.3 million (6%) during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. Because our wheat milling and packaged foods operations are operated through non-consolidated joint ventures, revenues reported in our Processing segment are entirely from our oilseed processing operations. Our oilseed operation net revenues decreased $46.3 million, primarily from a decrease in the average selling price of oilseed refined products in addition to volume decreases, as compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. Typically, changes in average selling prices of oilseed products are primarily driven by the average market prices of soybeans.
 
Cost of Goods Sold.   Consolidated cost of goods sold were $18.0 billion for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to $18.4 billion for the nine months ended May 31, 2009, which represents a $0.4 billion (2%) decrease.
 
Our Energy segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $6.1 billion increased by $1.0 billion (20%) during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in cost of goods sold is primarily due to increased volumes for renewable fuels marketing products and increased refined fuels cost of product. Specifically, refined fuels cost of goods sold increased $305.3 million (9%) which reflects an increase in the average cost of refined fuels of $0.32 per gallon (18%) partially offset by volumes decreases of 8%, compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. On average, we process approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day at our Laurel, Montana refinery and 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day at NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. The average cost increase is primarily related to higher input costs at our two crude oil refineries and higher average prices on the refined products that we purchased for resale compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. The aggregate average per unit cost of crude oil purchased for the two refineries increased 31% compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. The cost of propane decreased $43.5 million (7%), mostly from a decrease of $0.19 per gallon (15%); partially offset by a 10% increase in volumes, when compared to the nine months ended May 31,


26


Table of Contents

2009. The increase in propane volumes primarily reflects increased demand caused by an improved crop drying season and an earlier home heating season. Renewable fuels marketing costs increased $420.8 million (109%), mostly from a 102% increase in volumes, in addition to an increase in the average cost of $0.06 per gallon (3%), when compared with the same nine-month period in the previous year.
 
Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $11.2 billion, decreased $1.3 billion (11%) during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period of the prior year. Grain cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $8.7 billion and $9.3 billion during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The cost of grains and oilseed procured through our Ag Business segment decreased $657.4 million (7%) compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. This is primarily the result of a $1.28 (17%) decrease in the average cost per bushel, partially offset by a 13% net increase in bushels sold as compared to the same period in the prior year. The average month-end market price per bushel of spring wheat, corn and soybeans decreased compared to the same nine-month period a year ago.
 
Wholesale crop nutrients cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Of this $549.5 million (33%) decrease in wholesale crop nutrients cost of goods sold, approximately $75 million is due to the net change in the lower-of-cost or market adjustments on inventories during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2010, as previously discussed. The average cost per ton of fertilizer decreased $186 (37%), partially offset by a net volume increase of 7% when compared to the same nine-month period in the prior year.
 
Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, excluding the cost of grains and wholesale crop nutrients procured through this segment, decreased by $100.8 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to net lower input commodity prices, partially offset by increases due to volumes generated from acquisitions made and reflected in previous reporting periods.
 
Our Processing segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $753.0 million decreased $49.2 million (6%) compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009, which was primarily due to a decrease in the cost of soybeans.
 
Marketing, General and Administrative.   Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $268.6 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 decreased by $8.5 million (3%) compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. This net decrease includes reduced expenses in our wholesale crop nutrient operations within our Ag Business segment of $3.9 million, in addition to reduced accruals for variable pay in many of our other operations and Corporate and Other, partially offset by expansion of foreign operations and acquisitions.
 
Loss (Gain) on Investments.   During the nine months ended May 31, 2010, we recorded a net gain on investments of $24.1 million, of which $23.7 million relates to the sales of many of our remaining Agriliance facilities, included in our Ag Business segment and $0.4 million is included in Corporate and Other. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we recorded a net loss on investments of $55.7 million, including a $74.3 million loss on our investment in VeraSun in our Processing segment, due to their bankruptcy. This loss was partially offset by a gain on investments in our Energy segment. We sold all of our 180,000 shares of NYMEX Holdings stock for proceeds of $16.1 million and recorded a pretax gain of $15.7 million. Also during the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we recorded a net gain on investments of $2.9 million, included in our Ag Business segment, which primarily relates to a gain on the sale of a Canadian agronomy investment.
 
Interest, net.   Net interest of $45.0 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 decreased $5.3 million (11%) compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. Interest expense for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 was $53.1 million and $62.4 million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense of $9.3 million (15%) primarily relates to the average level of short-term borrowings which decreased $110.3 million (33%) during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, mostly due to significantly reduced working capital needs resulting from lower commodity prices, in addition to reduced interest expense due to the principal payments on our long-term debt in the past 12 months.


27


Table of Contents

For the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we capitalized interest of $4.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively, primarily related to construction projects at both refineries in our Energy segment. Interest income, generated primarily from marketable securities, was $3.6 million and $8.4 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net decrease in interest income of $4.8 million (58%) was mostly in Corporate and Other and at NCRA within our Energy segment, which primarily relates to marketable securities with interest yields lower than a year ago.
 
Equity Income from Investments.   Equity income from investments of $80.8 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 increased $6.7 million (9%) compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. We record equity income or loss from the investments in which we have an ownership interest of 50% or less and have significant influence, but not control, for our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net increase in equity income from investments was attributable to improved earnings from investments in our Ag Business and Energy segments of $8.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively, partially offset by reduced earnings in our Processing segment and Corporate and Other of $3.1 million and $9 thousand, respectively.
 
Our Ag Business segment generated improved equity investment earnings of $8.9 million. Our share of equity investment earnings or losses in agronomy improved earnings by $12.5 million, and includes improved retail margins, partially offset by reduced earnings of a Canadian agronomy joint venture, which was sold during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. We had a net decrease of $3.4 million from our share of equity investment earnings in our grain marketing joint ventures during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to the same period the previous year, which is primarily related to an international investment, partially offset by improved export margins. Our country operations business reported an aggregate decrease in equity investment earnings of $0.2 million from several small equity investments.
 
Our Processing segment generated reduced equity investment earnings of $3.1 million. We recorded reduced earnings for Ventura Foods, our vegetable oil-based products and packaged foods joint venture, of $9.4 million compared to the same nine-month period in fiscal 2009. Gross margins were extremely strong in 2009 for Ventura Foods because of rapidly declining ingredient costs, and as these costs stabilized, gross margins have returned to a more normal level. We recorded improved earnings for Horizon Milling, our domestic and Canadian wheat milling joint ventures, of $6.3 million, net. Volatility in the grain markets created wheat procurement opportunities, which increased margins for Horizon Milling during fiscal 2010 compared to the same nine-month period in fiscal 2009.
 
Our Energy segment generated improved equity investment earnings of $0.9 million related to an equity investment held by NCRA.
 
Corporate and Other generated reduced earnings of $9 thousand from equity investment earnings, as compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009.
 
Income Taxes.   Income tax expense of $44.5 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared with $47.2 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009, resulting in effective tax rates of 10.8% and 12.3%, respectively. The federal and state statutory rate applied to nonpatronage business activity was 38.9% for the nine-month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. The income taxes and effective tax rate vary each year based upon profitability and nonpatronage business activity during each of the comparable years.
 
Noncontrolling Interests.   Noncontrolling interests of $20.1 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 decreased by $33.4 million (62%) compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2009. This net decrease was a result of significantly less profitable operations within our majority-owned subsidiaries. Substantially all noncontrolling interests relate to NCRA, an approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary, which we consolidate in our Energy segment.


28


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
On May 31, 2010, we had working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, of $1,821.1 million and a current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, of 1.7 to 1.0, compared to working capital of $1,626.4 million and a current ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 on August 31, 2009. On May 31, 2009, we had working capital of $1,716.3 million and a current ratio of 1.5 to 1.0, compared to working capital of $1,738.6 million and a current ratio of 1.4 to 1.0 on August 31, 2008.
 
On May 31, 2010, our committed line of credit consisted of a five-year revolving facility in the amount of $1.3 billion. This credit facility is established with a syndication of domestic and international banks, and our inventories and receivables financed with it are highly liquid. In June 2010, we amended our existing five-year revolving credit facility and reduced the committed amount thereunder from $1.3 billion to $700 million. The maturity date of the facility of May 2011 remained the same. In addition, we entered into a new five-year revolving credit facility with a committed amount of $900 million that expires in June 2015. The major financial covenants for both revolving facilities require us to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth, adjusted as defined in the credit agreements, of $2.5 billion and a consolidated funded debt to consolidated cash flow ratio of no greater than 3.00 to 1.00. The term consolidated cash flow is principally our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) with a few other adjustments as defined in the credit agreements. We did not renew our $300 million 364-day facility that expired in February 2010.
 
On May 31, 2010, we had no amount outstanding on our five-year revolving facility, compared to $252.0 million outstanding on May 31, 2009. We also had $20.0 million outstanding on our 364-day facility on May 31, 2009. We have two commercial paper programs totaling $125.0 million with banks participating in our five-year revolver. We had no commercial paper outstanding on May 31, 2010 and 2009. With our available capacity on our committed lines of credit, we believe that we have adequate liquidity to cover any increase in net operating assets and liabilities and expected capital expenditures.
 
In addition, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cofina Financial, makes seasonal and term loans to member cooperatives, businesses and individual producers of agricultural products included in our cash flows from investing activities, and has its own financing explained in further detail below under “Cash Flows from Financing Activities.”
 
Cash Flows from Operations
 
Cash flows from operations are generally affected by commodity prices and the seasonality of our businesses. These commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including weather, crop conditions, drought, the availability and the adequacy of supply and transportation, government regulations and policies, world events, and general political and economic conditions. These factors are described in the cautionary statements and may affect net operating assets and liabilities, and liquidity.
 
Our cash flows used in operating activities were $22.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010, compared to cash flows provided by operating activities of $678.2 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009. The fluctuation in cash flows when comparing the two periods is primarily from a net increase in operating assets and liabilities during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, compared to a net decrease in the nine months ended May 31, 2009. General commodity prices and inventory quantities increased during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, and resulted in increased working capital needs compared to August 31, 2009. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, commodity prices declined significantly and resulted in lower working capital needs compared to August 31, 2008.
 
Our operating activities used net cash of $22.3 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2010. Net income including noncontrolling interests of $368.2 million and net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $155.8 million were exceeded by an increase in net operating assets and liabilities of $546.3 million. The primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included depreciation and amortization, and amortization of deferred major repair costs, of $165.7 million and deferred taxes of $24.1 million, partially offset by gain on investments of $24.1 million and income from equity investments, net of redemptions of those investments, of $1.6 million. Gain on


29


Table of Contents

investments includes a $23.7 million gain recognized as a result of cash distributions received from Agriliance, primarily from the sale of many of their retail facilities. The increase in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by a general increase in commodity prices in addition to inventory quantities reflected in increased inventories and receivables, along with a decrease in customer credit balances and net derivative liabilities and assets on May 31, 2010, when compared to August 31, 2009. On May 31, 2010, the per bushel market prices of our three primary grain commodities changed as follows: corn increased $0.33 (10%), soybeans decreased $1.62 (15%) and spring wheat was comparable in relation to the prices on August 31, 2009. In general, crude oil market prices increased $4 (6%) per barrel on May 31, 2010 compared to August 31, 2009. On May 31, 2010, fertilizer commodity prices affecting our wholesale crop nutrients and country operations retail businesses generally increased between 23% and 42%, depending on the specific products, compared to prices on August 31, 2009, with the exception of potash, which decreased approximately 20% and urea which was comparable to the prices on August 31, 2009. An increase in grain inventory quantities in our Ag Business segment of 14.4 million bushels (16%) also contributed to the increase in net operating assets and liabilities when comparing inventories at May 31, 2010 to August 31, 2009.
 
Our operating activities provided net cash of $678.2 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2009. Net income including noncontrolling interests of $337.6 million, net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $215.7 million and a decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $124.9 million provided the cash flows from operating activities. The primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included depreciation and amortization, including major repair costs, of $163.0 million, loss on investments of $55.7 million and deferred tax expense of $17.8 million, partially offset by income from equity investments, net of redemptions from those investments, of $16.9 million. Loss on investments primarily includes the loss on our VeraSun investment, partially offset by gains from the sales of an agronomy investment and our NYMEX Holdings common stock. The decrease in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by a decline in commodity prices reflected in decreased receivables, inventories and net derivative assets and liabilities, partially offset by decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses and customer advance payments on May 31, 2009, when compared to August 31, 2008. On May 31, 2009, the per bushel market prices of our three primary grain commodities, corn, soybeans and spring wheat, decreased by $1.32 (23%), $1.48 (11%) and $0.89 (10%), respectively, when compared to the prices on August 31, 2008. In general, crude oil market prices decreased $49 (43%) per barrel between August 31, 2008 and May 31, 2009. In addition, on May 31, 2009, fertilizer commodity prices affecting our wholesale crop nutrients and country operations retail businesses generally had decreases between 32% and 70%, depending on the specific products, compared to prices on August 31, 2008. Partially offsetting the impact of the decline in commodity prices was a 12.8 million bushel increase (12%) in grain inventory quantities in our Ag Business segment.
 
At this time it is unknown what affects the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico may have on our Energy segment. We are not involved in oil exploration or drilling, but the oil spill may have a negative effect on our future Energy segment income and cash flows if new regulations are put in place that increase the costs of conducting business in the industry.
 
Our cash usage in our operating activities has generally been the lowest during our fourth fiscal quarter. Historically by this time we have sold a large portion of our seasonal agronomy-related inventories in our Ag Business segment operations and continue to collect cash from the related receivables.
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
 
For the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, the net cash flows used in our investing activities totaled $193.7 million and $285.3 million, respectively.
 
The acquisition of property, plant and equipment comprised the primary use of cash totaling $237.5 million and $225.9 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the year ending August 31, 2010, we expect to spend approximately $389.9 million for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment. Included in our projected capital spending through fiscal 2011 are expenditures to comply with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation that requires the reduction of the benzene level in gasoline to be less than 0.62% volume by January 1, 2011. As a result of this regulation, our refineries will incur capital


30


Table of Contents

expenditures to reduce the current gasoline benzene levels to meet the new regulated levels. We anticipate the combined capital expenditures for benzene removal for our Laurel, Montana and NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refineries to be approximately $134 million. Total expenditures for this project as of May 31, 2010 were approximately $69 million, of which $36 million was incurred during the nine months ended May 31, 2010.
 
Expenditures for major repairs related to our refinery turnarounds during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, were $5.1 million and $34 thousand, respectively.
 
In October 2003, we and NCRA reached agreements with the EPA and the State of Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality and the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment regarding the terms of settlements with respect to reducing air emissions at our Laurel, Montana and NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refineries. These settlements are part of a series of similar settlements that the EPA has negotiated with major refiners under the EPA’s Petroleum Refinery Initiative. The settlements take the form of consent decrees filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana (Billings Division) and the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. Each consent decree details potential capital improvements, supplemental environmental projects and operational changes that we and NCRA have agreed to implement, at the relevant refinery, over several years. The consent decrees also required us and NCRA to pay approximately $0.5 million in aggregate civil cash penalties. As of May 31, 2010, the aggregate capital expenditures for us and NCRA related to these settlements are complete, and totaled approximately $37 million. These settlements did not have a material adverse effect on us or NCRA.
 
Investments made during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, totaled $15.4 million and $115.7 million, respectively. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we invested $4.9 million and $76.3 million, respectively, in Multigrain AG (Multigrain) for its increased capital needs resulting from expansion of its operations. Our ownership interest in Multigrain is approximately 40%, and is included in our Ag Business segment. Also during the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we made capital contributions of $35.0 million to Ventura Foods, included in our Processing segment.
 
Cash acquisitions of businesses, net of cash received, totaled $76.4 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2009. Through August 31, 2008, we held a 49% ownership interest in Cofina Financial and accounted for our investment using the equity method of accounting. On September 1, 2008, we purchased the remaining 51% ownership interest for $53.3 million. The purchase price included cash of $48.5 million and the assumption of certain liabilities of $4.8 million. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, our Ag Business segment had acquisitions of $36.2 million.
 
Various cash acquisitions of intangibles were $1.0 million and $1.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Changes in notes receivable during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, resulted in a net decrease in cash flows of $56.8 million. The primary cause of the decrease in cash flows was additional Cofina Financial notes receivable in the amount of $39.9 million on May 31, 2010, compared to August 31, 2009, and the balance was a net increase of $16.9 million, primarily from related party notes receivable at NCRA from its minority owners. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, changes in notes receivable resulted in an increase in cash flows of $71.5 million. Of this change, $55.7 million of the increase in cash flows was from reduced Cofina Financial notes receivable and the balance of $15.8 million was primarily from the reduction of related party notes receivable at NCRA from its minority owners.
 
Partially offsetting our cash outlays for investing activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, were redemptions of investments we received totaling $114.0 million and $10.8 million, respectively. Of the redemptions received during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, $105.0 million was a return of capital from Agriliance primarily for proceeds the company received from the sale of many of its retail facilities. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we also received proceeds of $41.6 million from the sales of an agronomy investment and our NYMEX Holdings common stock. In addition, for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we received proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment of $8.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively.


31


Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
 
Working Capital Financing
 
We finance our working capital needs through short-term lines of credit with a syndication of domestic and international banks. In May 2006, we renewed and expanded our committed lines of revolving credit to include a five-year revolver with a total borrowing capacity of $1.3 billion as of May 31, 2010, and which had no outstanding drawn balance as of the same date. In June 2010, we amended this existing five-year revolving credit facility and reduced the committed amount thereunder from $1.3 billion to $700 million. The facility’s maturity date of May 2011 remained the same. In addition, we entered into a new five-year revolving credit facility with a committed amount of $900 million that expires in June 2015. The major financial covenants for both revolving facilities require us to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth, adjusted as defined in the credit agreements, of $2.5 billion and a consolidated funded debt to consolidated cash flow (adjusted EBITDA) ratio of no greater than 3.00 to 1.00. We did not renew our $300 million 364-day facility that expired in February 2010. In addition to the five-year revolving lines of credit, we have a committed revolving credit facility dedicated to NCRA, with a syndication of banks in the amount of $15.0 million. In December 2009, the line of credit dedicated to NCRA was renewed for an additional year. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, CHS Europe S.A. and CHS do Brasil Ltda., have uncommitted lines of credit which are collateralized by $10.0 million of inventories and receivables at May 31, 2010. On May 31, 2010, August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, we had total short-term indebtedness outstanding on these various facilities and other miscellaneous short-term notes payable totaling $13.0 million, $19.2 million and $278.4 million, respectively.
 
During fiscal 2007, we instituted two commercial paper programs, totaling up to $125.0 million, with two banks participating in our five-year revolving credit facility. Terms of our five-year revolving credit facility allow a maximum usage of commercial paper of $200.0 million at any point in time. These commercial paper programs do not increase our committed borrowing capacity in that we are required to have at least an equal amount of undrawn capacity available on our five-year revolving facility as to the amount of commercial paper issued. We had no commercial paper outstanding on May 31, 2010, August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009.
 
Cofina Financial Financing
 
Cofina Funding, LLC (Cofina Funding), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cofina Financial, has available credit totaling $237.0 million as of May 31, 2010, under note purchase agreements with various purchasers, through the issuance of short-term notes payable. Cofina Financial sells eligible commercial loans receivable it has originated to Cofina Funding, which are then pledged as collateral under the note purchase agreements. The notes payable issued by Cofina Funding bear interest at variable rates based on commercial paper and/or Eurodollar rates, with a weighted average commercial paper rate of 1.88% and a weighted average Eurodollar interest rate of 1.84% as of May 31, 2010. Borrowings by Cofina Funding utilizing the issuance of commercial paper under the note purchase agreements totaled $106.0 million as of May 31, 2010. As of May 31, 2010, $44.0 million of related loans receivable were accounted for as sales when they were surrendered in accordance with authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. As a result, the net borrowings under the note purchase agreements were $62.0 million.
 
Cofina Financial also sells loan commitments it has originated to ProPartners Financial (ProPartners) on a recourse basis. The total capacity for commitments under the ProPartners program is $120.0 million. The total outstanding commitments under the program totaled $90.9 million as of May 31, 2010, of which $63.3 million was borrowed under these commitments with an interest rate of 2.29%.
 
Cofina Financial borrows funds under short-term notes issued as part of a surplus funds program. Borrowings under this program are unsecured and bear interest at variable rates ranging from 0.85% to 1.35% as of May 31, 2010, and are due upon demand. Borrowings under these notes totaled $75.5 million as of May 31, 2010.


32


Table of Contents

Long-term Debt Financing
 
We typically finance our long-term capital needs, primarily for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment, with long-term agreements with various insurance companies and banks. In June 1998, we established a long-term credit agreement through cooperative banks for which we paid the note in full during fiscal 2009. The amount outstanding on May 31, 2009, was $12.3 million. Repayments of $36.9 million were made on this facility during the nine months ended May 31, 2009.
 
Also in June 1998, we completed a private placement offering with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $225.0 million with an interest rate of 6.81%. Repayments are due in equal annual installments of $37.5 million each, in the years 2008 through 2013. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, no repayments were due.
 
In January 2001, we entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Insurance Company. The long-term note in the amount of $25.0 million has an interest rate of 7.9% and is due in equal annual installments of approximately $3.6 million in the years 2005 through 2011. A subsequent note for $55.0 million was issued in March 2001, related to the private shelf facility. The $55.0 million note has an interest rate of 7.43% and is due in equal annual installments of approximately $7.9 million in the years 2005 through 2011. Repayments of $11.4 million were made during each of the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
In October 2002, we completed a private placement with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $175.0 million, which was layered into two series. The first series of $115.0 million has an interest rate of 4.96% and is due in equal semi-annual installments of approximately $8.8 million during the years 2007 through 2013. The second series of $60.0 million has an interest rate of 5.60% and is due in equal semi-annual installments of approximately $4.6 million during years 2012 through 2018. Repayments of $17.7 million were made on the first series notes during each of the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
In March 2004, we entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Capital Group, and in April 2004, we borrowed $30.0 million under this arrangement. One long-term note in the amount of $15.0 million had an interest rate of 4.08%, was due at the end of the six-year term in 2010, and was paid in full during the nine months ended May 31, 2010. Another long-term note in the amount of $15.0 million has an interest rate of 4.39% and is due in full at the end of the seven-year term in 2011. In April 2007, we amended our Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and several other participating insurance companies to expand the uncommitted facility from $70.0 million to $150.0 million. We borrowed $50.0 million under the shelf arrangement in February 2008, for which the aggregate long-term notes have an interest rate of 5.78% and are due in equal annual installments of $10.0 million during years 2014 through 2018.
 
In September 2004, we entered into a private placement with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $125.0 million with an interest rate of 5.25%. Repayments are due in equal annual installments of $25.0 million during years 2011 through 2015.
 
In October 2007, we entered into a private placement with several insurance companies and banks for long-term debt in the amount of $400.0 million with an interest rate of 6.18%. Repayments are due in equal annual installments of $80.0 million during years 2013 through 2017.
 
In December 2007, we established a ten-year long-term credit agreement through a syndication of cooperative banks in the amount of $150.0 million, with an interest rate of 5.59%. Repayments are due in equal semi-annual installments of $15.0 million each, starting in June 2013 through December 2018.
 
On May 31, 2010, we had total long-term debt outstanding of $1,023.8 million, of which $150.0 million was bank financing, $855.6 million was private placement debt and $18.2 million was industrial development revenue bonds, and other notes and contracts payable. The aggregate amount of long-term debt payable presented in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009, has not changed significantly during the nine months ended May 31, 2010. On


33


Table of Contents

May 31, 2009, we had long-term debt outstanding of $1,122.2 million. Our long-term debt is unsecured except for other notes and contracts in the amount of $11.0 million; however, restrictive covenants under various agreements have requirements for maintenance of minimum working capital levels and other financial ratios as of May 31, 2010. We were in compliance with all debt covenants and restrictions as of May 31, 2010.
 
We did not have any new long-term borrowings during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 or 2009. During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we repaid long-term debt of $46.9 million and $68.6 million, respectively.
 
Other Financing
 
During the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, changes in checks and drafts outstanding resulted in an increase in cash flows of $18.9 million and a decrease in cash flows of $52.4 million, respectively.
 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, were $2.0 million and $18.6 million, respectively, and were primarily related to NCRA.
 
In accordance with the bylaws and by action of the Board of Directors, annual net earnings from patronage sources are distributed to consenting patrons following the close of each fiscal year. Patronage refunds are calculated based on amounts using financial statement earnings. The cash portion of the patronage distribution is determined annually by the Board of Directors, with the balance issued in the form of capital equity certificates. Consenting patrons have agreed to take both the cash and the capital equity certificate portion allocated to them from our previous fiscal year’s income into their taxable income, and as a result, we are allowed a deduction from our taxable income for both the cash distribution and the allocated capital equity certificates as long as the cash distribution is at least 20% of the total patronage distribution. The patronage earnings from the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, were distributed during the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The cash portion of this distribution, deemed by the Board of Directors to be 35%, was $153.9 million. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we distributed cash patronage of $227.6 million.
 
Redemptions of capital equity certificates, approved by the Board of Directors, are divided into two pools, one for non-individuals (primarily member cooperatives) who may participate in an annual pro-rata program for equities held by them, and another for individuals who are eligible for equity redemptions at age 70 or upon death. The amount that each non-individual receives under the pro-rata program in any year is determined by multiplying the dollars available for pro-rata redemptions, if any that year, as determined by the Board of Directors, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by them, and the denominator of which is the sum of the patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by all eligible holders of patronage certificates that are not individuals. In accordance with authorization from the Board of Directors, redemptions related to the year ended August 31, 2009, that were distributed in cash during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, amounted to $17.0 million compared to $40.8 million distributed in cash during the nine months ended May 31, 2009. We also redeemed $36.7 million of capital equity certificates during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, by issuing shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock) pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. During the nine months ended May 31, 2009, we redeemed $49.9 million of capital equity certificates by issuing shares of our Preferred Stock.
 
Our Preferred Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CHSCP. On May 31, 2010, we had 12,272,003 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding with a total redemption value of approximately $306.8 million, excluding accumulated dividends. Our Preferred Stock accumulates dividends at a rate of 8% per year, which are payable quarterly, and is redeemable at our option. At this time, we have no current plan or intent to redeem any Preferred Stock. Dividends paid on our preferred stock during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, were $17.1 million and $14.5 million, respectively.


34


Table of Contents

Off Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
 
Lease Commitments:
 
Our lease commitments presented in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009, have not materially changed during the nine months ended May 31, 2010.
 
Guarantees:
 
We are a guarantor for lines of credit and performance obligations of related companies. As of May 31, 2010, our bank covenants allowed maximum guarantees of $500.0 million, of which $17.1 million was outstanding. We have collateral for a portion of these contingent obligations. We have not recorded a liability related to the contingent obligations as we do not expect to pay out any cash related to them, and the fair values are considered immaterial. The underlying loans to the counterparties, for which we provide guarantees, are current as of May 31, 2010.
 
Debt:
 
There is no material off balance sheet debt.
 
Cofina Financial:
 
As of May 31, 2010, loans receivable of $44.0 million were accounted for as sales when they were surrendered in accordance with authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities.
 
Contractual Obligations
 
Our contractual obligations are presented in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009. The total obligations decreased by approximately 8% during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 compared to August 31, 2009, primarily due to a decrease in fertilizer supply contracts.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Our critical accounting policies are presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009. There have been no changes to these policies during the nine months ended May 31, 2010.
 
Effect of Inflation and Foreign Currency Transactions
 
We believe that inflation and foreign currency fluctuations have not had a significant effect on our operations since we conduct essentially all of our business in U.S. dollars.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715-20-65-2, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets,” which expands the annual disclosure requirements about fair value measurements of plan assets for pension plans, postretirement medical plans and other funded postretirement plans. ASC 715-20-65-2 will only impact disclosures and is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860-10-65-3, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets,” which requires additional disclosures concerning a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred financial assets. ASC 860-10-65-3 eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements in fiscal 2011.


35


Table of Contents

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860-10-65-2, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” which requires an enterprise to conduct a qualitative analysis for the purpose of determining whether, based on its variable interests, it also has a controlling interest in a variable interest entity. ASC 860-10-65-2 clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. ASC 860-10-65-2 requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. It also requires additional disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. ASC 860-10-65-2 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements in fiscal 2011.
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” which amends existing disclosure requirements under ASC 820. ASU No. 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers between Levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy and separate disclosures for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of activity for Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU also clarifies the existing fair value disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value. ASU No. 2010-06 will only impact disclosures and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity for Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010.
 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT
 
Any statements contained in this report regarding the outlook for our businesses and their respective markets, such as projections of future performance, statements of our plans and objectives, forecasts of market trends and other matters, are forward-looking statements based on our assumptions and beliefs. Such statements may be identified by such words or phrases as “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “outlook,” “will benefit,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “management believes” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such statements and no assurance can be given that the results in any forward-looking statement will be achieved. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we disclaim any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after such date or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
 
Certain factors could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements contained in this report. These factors include the factors discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009 under the caption “Risk Factors,” the factors discussed below and any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or referred to in connection with any such forward-looking statements. Since it is not possible to foresee all such factors, these factors should not be considered as complete or exhaustive.
 
  •  Our revenues and operating results could be adversely affected by changes in commodity prices.
 
  •  Our operating results could be adversely affected if our members were to do business with others rather than with us.
 
  •  We participate in highly competitive business markets in which we may not be able to continue to compete successfully.


36


Table of Contents

 
  •  Changes in federal income tax laws or in our tax status could increase our tax liability and reduce our net income.
 
  •  We incur significant costs in complying with applicable laws and regulations. Any failure to make the capital investments necessary to comply with these laws and regulations could expose us to financial liability.
 
  •  Changing environmental and energy laws and regulation, including those related to climate change and Green House Gas (“GHG”) emissions, may result in increased operating costs and capital expenditures and may have an adverse effect on our business operations.
 
  •  Environmental liabilities could adversely affect our results and financial condition.
 
  •  Actual or perceived quality, safety or health risks associated with our products could subject us to liability and damage our business and reputation.
 
  •  Our operations are subject to business interruptions and casualty losses; we do not insure against all potential losses and could be seriously harmed by unexpected liabilities.
 
  •  Our cooperative structure limits our ability to access equity capital.
 
  •  Consolidation among the producers of products we purchase and customers for products we sell could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.
 
  •  If our customers choose alternatives to our refined petroleum products our revenues and profits may decline.
 
  •  Operating results from our agronomy business could be volatile and are dependent upon certain factors outside of our control.
 
  •  Technological improvements in agriculture could decrease the demand for our agronomy and energy products.
 
  •  We operate some of our business through joint ventures in which our rights to control business decisions are limited.
 
ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
We did not experience any material changes in market risk exposures for the period ended May 31, 2010, that affect the quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009.
 
ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of May 31, 2010. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of that date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
 
During the third fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2010, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


37


Table of Contents

 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors
 
We had a change to one of our risk factors during the nine months ended May 31, 2010, as disclosed below. For all risk factors, see the discussion of risk factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009.
 
Changing environmental and energy laws and regulation, including those related to climate change and Green House Gas (“GHG”) emissions, may result in increased operating costs and capital expenditures and may have an adverse effect on our business operations.
 
New environmental laws and regulations, including new regulations relating to alternative energy sources and the risk of global climate change, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, increased governmental enforcement or other developments could require us to make additional unforeseen expenditures. There is growing consensus that some form of regulation will be forthcoming at the federal level in the United States with respect to emissions of GHGs, (including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxides). Also, new federal or state legislation or regulatory programs that restrict emissions of GHGs in areas where we conduct business could adversely affect our operations and demand for our energy products. New legislation or regulator programs could require substantial expenditures for the installation and operation of systems and equipment that we do not currently possess.
 
From time to time, new federal energy policy legislation is enacted by the U.S. Congress. For example, in December 2007, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act, which, among other provisions, mandates annually increasing levels for the use of renewable fuels such as ethanol, commencing in 2008 and escalating for 15 years, as well as increasing energy efficiency goals, including higher fuel economy standards for motor vehicles, among other steps. These statutory mandates may have the impact over time of offsetting projected increases in the demand for refined petroleum products in certain markets, particularly gasoline. Other legislative changes may similarly alter the expected demand and supply projections for refined petroleum products in ways that cannot be predicted.
 
On December 15, 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officially published its findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHGs present an endangerment to human health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. These findings by the EPA allow the agency to proceed with the adoption and implementation of regulations that would restrict emissions of GHGs under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). In late September 2009, the EPA had proposed two sets of regulations in anticipation of finalizing its findings that would require a reduction in emissions of GHGs from motor vehicles and that could also lead to the imposition of GHG emission limitations in CAA permits for certain stationary sources. In addition, on September 22, 2009, the EPA issued a final rule requiring the reporting of GHG emissions from specified large GHG emission sources in the United States beginning in 2011 for emissions occurring in 2010. Our refineries, and possibly other of our facilities, will be required to report GHG emissions from certain sources under the rule.
 
Also, on June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved adoption of the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009,” (“ACESA”), also known as the “Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade legislation.” The purpose of ACESA is to control and reduce emissions of GHGs in the United States. ACESA would establish an economy-wide cap on emissions of GHGs in the United States and would require an overall reduction in GHG emissions of 17% (from 2005 levels) by 2020, and by over 80% by 2050. Under ACESA, most sources of GHG emissions would be required to obtain GHG emission “allowances” corresponding to their annual emissions of GHGs. The number of emission allowances issued each year would decline as necessary to meet ACESA’s overall emission reduction goals. As the number of GHG emission allowances permitted by ACESA declines each year, the cost or value of allowances would be expected to increase. The net effect of ACESA would be to impose increasing costs on the combustion of carbon-based fuels such as oil, refined petroleum products and gas. The U.S. Senate has begun work on its own legislation for controlling and


38


Table of Contents

reducing emissions of GHGs in the United States. If the Senate adopts GHG legislation that is different from ACESA, the Senate legislation would need to be reconciled with ACESA and both chambers would be required to approve identical legislation before it could become law.
 
It is not possible at this time to predict whether climate change legislation will be enacted. The adoption and implementation of any regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting emissions of GHGs from, our equipment and operations could require us to incur costs to reduce emissions of GHGs associated with our operations or could adversely affect demand for the energy products that we produce. Further, we may be required to purchase “allowances” under the proposed cap-and-trade legislation. We believe that a significant part, if not all, of these costs would be passed on in the price of our products. However, the extent of our ability to pass on such costs is unknown. Further, a change in consumer practices could result in a reduction in consumption of carbon-based fuels resulting in a decrease in the demand for our energy products.
 
In response to proposed cap-and-trade legislation, we are developing the expertise to trade emission allowances and could potentially generate revenues from such business. The extent of such revenues which could be obtained is, however, unknown at this time.
 
Finally, it should be noted that some scientists believe that increasing concentrations of GHGs in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods and other climatic events. However, the potential physical impacts of such climate change are uncertain and may vary by region. If any such effects were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our operations. Significant climate changes may, for example, affect crop production including a possible shift in crop production to other geographic territories. The impact of climate changes could be positive or negative for our Ag Business segment. Crop failures due to weather conditions could also adversely affect the demand for our crop input products such as fertilizer and chemicals. We believe, however, that the effects of climate change will be over the long term and would likely only have an impact over many decades.
 
Because our refineries are inland facilities, a possibility of increased hurricane activity due to climate change, which may result in the temporary closure of coast refineries, could result in increased revenues and margins to us due to the decrease in supply of refined products in the marketplace. The actual effects of climate change on our businesses are, however, unknown and undeterminable at this time.
 
ITEM 6.    Exhibits
 
         
Exhibit
 
Description
 
  3 .1   Amended Article III, Section 3(b) of Bylaws of CHS Inc. (Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 5, 2010)
  10 .1   CHS Inc. Nonemployee Director Retirement Plan
  10 .2   Trust Under the CHS Inc. Nonemployee Director Retirement Plan
  10 .3   CHS Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (2010 Restatement)
  31 .1   Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  31 .2   Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32 .1   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32 .2   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


39


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
CHS Inc.
(Registrant)
 
July 8, 2010
 
/s/  John Schmitz
John Schmitz
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


40

Exhibit 10.1
CHS INC.
NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RETIREMENT PLAN
     1.  Introduction . CHS Inc. (“CHS”) has previously established the CHS Inc. Nonemployee Director Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) for the purpose of providing retirement benefits for its non-employee directors. Such Plan has heretofore been maintained under a document titled “POLICY REGARDING RETIREMENT BENEFIT FOR RETIRED DIRECTOR”, together with all amendments thereto. The Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety.
     2.  Eligibility . Each individual who is a member of the Board (a “Director”) and who is not also an officer or employee of CHS or its subsidiaries is eligible to participate in this Plan (an “Eligible Director”).
     3.  Administration . This Plan shall be administered by the person or persons appointed by the Board to administer the Plan (the “Administrator”). If the Board does not appoint an Administrator, the Board shall be the Administrator. The Administrator shall have the authority to interpret and construe the provisions of the Plan as it deems appropriate, to resolve all factual and legal questions concerning the status and rights of an Eligible Director or beneficiary entitled to any benefits that may be payable under the Plan. The Administrator’s interpretations, determinations and calculations will be final and binding on all persons and parties concerned. The Administrator shall be responsible for the general operation and administration of the Plan, and may delegate such responsibility to one or more persons as it deems appropriate for carrying out the provisions thereof. The Administrator shall be entitled to rely conclusively on all calculations, valuations, opinions and reports furnished by any actuary, consultant, accountant, counsel or other person appointed, employed or engaged by the Administrator with respect to the Plan.
     4.  Year of Service . An Eligible Director completes a year of service (a “Year of Service”) upon completion of twelve (12) months of service as an Eligible Director, measured from the occurrence of the first meeting coincident with or next following the date the individual becomes an Eligible Director. An Eligible Director’s Service shall cease upon the first meeting coincident with or next following the date the individual ceases to be an Eligible Director. Credit shall be given for partially completed Years of Service for each completed month or portion thereof.
     5.  Retirement Benefit . Except as provided for in Section 5.5 a monthly retirement benefit shall be payable to an Eligible Director under this Section 5. The Eligible Director’s retirement benefit shall commence upon the first day of the calendar month coincident with or next following the later of: (i) the Eligible Director’s Separation from Service, and (ii) the Eligible Director’s attainment of age sixty (60). Except as provided in Section 5.1 below, the Eligible Director’s retirement benefit shall end with the payment made for the calendar month in which the Director dies. The amount of the Eligible Director’s monthly retirement benefit under the Plan shall equal Two Hundred Dollars ($200) multiplied by the Eligible Director’s Years of Service, subject to a maximum monthly benefit of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000).

 


 

          5.1. Ten-Year Pension Value Guarantee . If an Eligible Director dies after his or her retirement benefit commences but prior to completion of one hundred twenty (120) monthly payments, the Eligible Director’s beneficiary shall be entitled to the remaining number of monthly payments (paid at the same time and in the same manner as if the Eligible Director had survived). If an Eligible Director dies prior to commencing his or her retirement benefit, the Eligible Director’s beneficiary shall be entitled to one hundred twenty (120) monthly payments of the Eligible Director’s monthly retirement benefit accrued as of the date of death, commencing as of the first day of the calendar month coincident with or next following the later of: (i) the Eligible Director’s death, or (ii) the date the Eligible Director would have attained age sixty (60).
          5.2. Payment of Monthly Benefit . Actual payment of benefits shall be made as soon as administratively feasible (but in all events within thirty (30) days) following the first day of the calendar month in which such payment becomes due and payable.
          5.3. Separation from Service . For purposes of this Section 5, a “Separation from Service” shall mean a complete severance of a Director’s relationship as a director of CHS and all affiliates, if any, and as an independent contractor of CHS and all affiliates, if any, for any reason (including death). A Director may have a Separation from Service upon resignation as a director even if the Director then becomes an officer or employee. Separation from Service shall be construed to have a meaning consistent with the term “separation from service” as used and defined in Section 409A of the Code. If an Eligible Director is a “specified employee” (as that term is defined under Section 409A of the Code), any benefits that become payable within the first six months of the Director’s Separation from Service shall be delayed until the first day of the seventh month following such Separation from Service.
          5.4. Beneficiary Designation . Each Eligible Director shall file with the Administrator a notice in writing, on a form provided by the Administrator, designating one or more beneficiaries to whom payment shall be made in the event of the Director’s death prior to receiving one hundred twenty (120) monthly payments under this Section 5. If no beneficiary designation is made, or in the event that a beneficiary designated predeceases the Eligible Director, payment shall be made to the Director’s estate.
          5.5. Special One Time Lump Sum Election . Each eligible Director who was on the Board on December 2, 2005, had the opportunity to elect prior to December 22, 2005 to receive their retirement benefit in I) a monthly annuity; or II) a single lump sum payment. If the Director choose a lump sum, payment will be based on the net present value of the Director’s accrued benefit at age 60, payable at the time the Director leaves the Board. Such present value shall be based on the assumptions used in determining lump sum distributions under the CHS Inc. Cash Balance Pension Plan.
     6.  Limitations .
          6.1. Effect of Post-Retirement Re-Election to the Board . Re-election of a Director to the Board after the Director incurs a Separation from Service will not suspend or otherwise impact the Director’s retirement benefit accrued prior to the Separation from Service; provided,

2


 

however , that any fees, retainer or other remuneration that is to be paid to such re-elected Director for services rendered at or after re-election to the Board shall be offset by any retirement benefits actually paid to Director under this Plan. With respect to a Director who incurs a Separation from Service on or after January 1, 2009, such Director shall be prohibited from serving on the Board once the Director has commenced receiving retirement benefits under this Plan.
          6.2. Service as a Director . Nothing in this Plan will interfere with or limit in any way the right of CHS’ Board or its stockholders to remove an Eligible Director from the Board. Neither this Plan nor any action taken pursuant to it will constitute or be evidence of any agreement or understanding, express or implied, that CHS’ Board or its stockholders have retained or will retain an Eligible Director for any period of time or at any particular rate of compensation.
          6.3. Nonexclusivity of the Plan . Nothing contained in this Plan is intended to effect, modify or rescind any of CHS’ existing compensation plans or programs or to create any limitations on the Board’s power or authority to modify or adopt compensation arrangements as the Board may from time to time deem necessary or desirable.
     7.  Plan Amendment, Modification and Termination .
          7.1. Amendment or Termination . CHS intends the Plan to be permanent but reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Any such amendment or termination shall be made pursuant to a resolution of CHS’ Board and will be effective as of the date provided in the resolution. An amendment will be stated in an instrument in writing signed in the name of CHS by a person authorized by the Board and all parties interested herein will be bound thereby.
          7.2. Impact on Benefits . No amendment or termination of the Plan shall directly or indirectly reduce any benefit accrued under Section 5 as of the date of such amendment or termination. Upon the termination of the Plan, distribution of benefits payable to each Eligible Director or the Director’s beneficiary shall be made in accordance with Section 5 of the Plan.
     8.  Duration of the Plan . This Plan will continue until the termination of the Plan by the Board.
     9.  Inalienability . The benefits payable hereunder or the right to receive future benefits under the Plan may not be anticipated, alienated, sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, encumbered, or subjected to any charge or legal process; and no interest or right to receive a benefit may be taken, either voluntarily or involuntarily, for the satisfaction of the debts of, or other obligations or claims against, such person or entity.
     10.  Unsecured Claim . The right of an Eligible Director or the Director’s beneficiary to receive a benefit hereunder shall be an unsecured claim against the general assets of CHS, and neither an Eligible Director nor his or her beneficiary shall have any rights in or against any amount accrued under the Plan or any other assets of CHS. The Plan shall at all times be considered entirely unfunded for tax purposes.

3


 

     11.  Severability . If any provisions of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of this Plan, but this Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal and invalid provisions never had been included herein.
     12.  Taxes . CHS has the right to deduct from all payments made under the Plan to an Eligible Director or a beneficiary federal, state, local or other taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payments.
     13.  Governing Law . To the extent not pre-empted by federal law, the laws of the State of Minnesota shall be the controlling state law in all matters relating to this Plan.
     14.  Effective Date . The effective date of this restatement shall be March 1, 2010.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CHS Inc. Has caused its name to be hereunto subscribed by Its President and CEO this 15 th day of March 2010
             
    CHS Inc.    
 
           
 
  By   /s/ John D. Johnson
 
John D. Johnson
   
 
      Its President and CEO    
 
           

4

Exhibit 10.2
TRUST UNDER THE
CHS INC. NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RETIREMENT PLAN
     This Agreement made this 31 day of March, 2010, by and between CHS Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “CHS”) and U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States with offices located in Minneapolis, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as “Trustee”);
      WHEREAS , CHS maintains the CHS Inc. Nonemployee Director Retirement Plan, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of its nonemployee directors (the “Plan”);
      WHEREAS , CHS has incurred or expects to incur liability under the terms of such Plan with respect to the individuals participating in such Plan;
      WHEREAS , CHS has previously established a trust (hereinafter referred to as the “Trust”) maintained under a trust agreement titled “FARMERS UNION CENTRAL EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED DIRECTOR RETIREMENT TRUST AGREEMENT”, together with any amendments thereto;
      WHEREAS , CHS has contributed to the Trust assets that shall be held therein, subject to the claims of CHS’ creditors in the event of CHS’ Insolvency, as herein defined, until paid to Plan participants and their beneficiaries in such manner and at such times as specified in the Plan;
      WHEREAS , it is the intention of the parties that (i) this Trust shall constitute an unfunded arrangement and shall not affect the status of the Plan as an unfunded plan maintained for the purpose of providing nonqualified deferred compensation for nonemployee directors and (ii) the Plan and Trust will be exempt from Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, (“ERISA”) because the Plan does not cover any “employee” as defined in ERISA Section 3(6) and is not therefore an “employee benefit plan” as defined in ERISA Section 3(3) and mentioned in ERISA Section 4(a).
      WHEREAS , it is the intention of CHS to continue to make contributions to the Trust to provide itself with a source of funds to assist it in the meeting of its liabilities under the Plan;
      NOW, THEREFORE , the parties do hereby amend and restate the trust agreement to the Trust (“Trust Agreement”) and agree that the Trust shall be comprised, held and disposed of as follows:
     Section 1. Establishment of Trust .
  (a)   The principal of the Trust shall be held, administered and disposed of by Trustee as provided in this Trust Agreement.


 

  (b)   The Trust shall be irrevocable.
 
  (c)   The Trust is intended to be a grantor trust, of which CHS is the grantor, within the meaning of subpart E, part 1, subchapter J, chapter 1, subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall be construed accordingly.
 
  (d)   The principal of the Trust, and any earnings thereon shall be held separate and apart from other funds of CHS and shall be used exclusively for the uses and purposes of Plan participants and general creditors as herein set forth. Plan participants and their beneficiaries shall have no preferred claim on, or any beneficial ownership interest in, any assets of the Trust. Any rights created under the Plan and this Trust Agreement shall be mere unsecured contractual rights of Plan participants and their beneficiaries against CHS. Any assets held by the Trust will be subject to the claims of CHS’ general creditors under federal and state law in the event of Insolvency, as defined in Section 3(a) herein.
 
  (e)   CHS, in its sole discretion, may at any time, or from time to time, make additional deposits of cash or other property in trust with Trustee to augment the principal to be held, administered and disposed of by Trustee as provided in this Trust Agreement. Neither Trustee nor any Plan participant or beneficiary shall have any right to compel such additional deposits.
     Section 2. Payments to Plan Participants and Their Beneficiaries .
  (a)   CHS shall deliver to Trustee a schedule (the “Payment Schedule”) that indicates the amounts payable in respect of each Plan participant (and his or her beneficiaries), that provides a formula or other instructions acceptable to Trustee for determining the amounts so payable, the form in which such amounts are to be paid (as provided for or available under the Plan), and the time of commencement for payment of such amounts. Except as otherwise provided herein, Trustee shall make payments to the Plan participants and their beneficiaries in accordance with such Payment Schedule. The Trustee shall make provision for the reporting and withholding of any federal, state or local taxes that may be required to be withheld with respect to the payment of benefits pursuant to the terms of the Plan and shall pay amounts withheld to the appropriate taxing authorities or determine that such amounts have been reported, withheld and paid by CHS.
 
  (b)   The entitlement of a Plan participant or his or her beneficiaries to benefits under the Plan shall be determined by CHS or such party as it shall designate under the Plan, and any claim for such benefits shall be considered and reviewed under the procedures set out in the Plan.
 
  (c)   CHS may make payment of benefits directly to Plan participants or their beneficiaries as they become due under the terms of the Plan, and thereafter seek

-2-


 

      reimbursement from the Trust for the same amount. CHS shall notify Trustee of its decision to make payment of benefits directly prior to the time amounts are payable to participants or their beneficiaries. In addition, if the principal of the Trust, and any earnings thereon, are not sufficient to make payments of benefits in accordance with the terms of the Plan, CHS shall make the balance of each such payment as it falls due. Trustee shall notify CHS where principal and earnings are not sufficient.
     Section 3. Trustee Responsibility Regarding Payments to Trust Beneficiary When CHS Is Insolvent .
  (a)   Trustee shall cease payment of benefits to Plan participants and their beneficiaries if CHS is Insolvent. CHS shall be considered “Insolvent” for purposes of this Trust Agreement if (i) CHS is unable to pay its debts as they become due, or (ii) CHS is subject to a pending proceeding as a debtor under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
 
  (b)   At all times during the continuance of this Trust, as provided in Section l(d) hereof, the principal and income of the Trust shall be subject to claims of general creditors of CHS under federal and state law as set forth below.
  (1)   The Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer of CHS shall have the duty to inform Trustee in writing of CHS’ Insolvency. If a person claiming to be a creditor of CHS alleges in writing to Trustee that CHS has become Insolvent, Trustee shall determine whether CHS is Insolvent and, pending such determination, Trustee shall discontinue payment of benefits to Plan participants or their beneficiaries.
 
  (2)   Unless Trustee has actual knowledge of CHS’ Insolvency, or has received notice from CHS or a person claiming to be a creditor alleging that CHS is Insolvent, Trustee shall have no duty to inquire whether CHS is Insolvent. Trustee may in all events rely on such evidence concerning CHS’ solvency as may be furnished to Trustee and that provides Trustee with a reasonable basis for making a determination concerning CHS’ solvency.
 
  (3)   If at any time Trustee has determined that CHS is Insolvent, Trustee shall discontinue payments to Plan participants or their beneficiaries and shall ho1d the assets of the Trust for the benefit of CHS’ general creditors. Nothing in this Trust Agreement shall in any way diminish any rights of Plan participants or their beneficiaries to pursue their rights as general creditors of CHS with respect to benefits due under the Plan or otherwise.
 
  (4)   Trustee shall resume the payment of benefits to Plan participants or their beneficiaries in accordance with Section 2 of this Trust Agreement only

-3-


 

      after Trustee has determined that CHS is not Insolvent (or is no longer Insolvent).
  (c)   Provided that there are sufficient assets, if Trustee discontinues the payment of benefits from the Trust pursuant to Section 3(b) hereof and subsequently resumes such payments, the first payment following such discontinuance shall include the aggregate amount of all payments due to Plan participants or their beneficiaries under the terms of the Plan for the period of such discontinuance, less the aggregate amount of any payments made to Plan participants or their beneficiaries by CHS in lieu of the payments provided for hereunder during any such period of discontinuance.
     Section 4. Payments to CHS . Except as provided in Section 2(c) and Section 3 hereof, CHS shall have no right or power to direct Trustee to return to CHS or to divert to others any of the Trust assets before all payment of benefits have been made to Plan participants and their beneficiaries pursuant to the terms of the Plan.
     Section 5. Investment Authority .
  (a)   Trustee may invest in securities (including stock or rights to acquire stock) or obligations issued by CHS. All rights associated with assets of the Trust shall be exercised by Trustee or the person designated by Trustee, and shall in no event be exercisable by or rest with Plan participants.
 
  (b)   CHS shall have the right at anytime, and from time to time in its sole discretion, to substitute assets of equal fair market value for any asset held by the Trust. This right is exercisable by CHS in a nonfiduciary capacity without the approval or consent of any person in a fiduciary capacity.
     Section 6. Disposition of Income . During the term of this Trust, all income received by the Trust, net of expenses and taxes, shall be accumulated and reinvested.
     Section 7. Accounting by Trustee . Trustee shall keep accurate and detailed records of all investments, receipts, disbursements, and all other transactions required to be made, including such specific records as shall be agreed upon in writing between CHS and Trustee. Within 30 days following the close of each calendar year and within 30 days after the removal or resignation of Trustee, Trustee shall deliver to CHS a written account of its administration of the Trust during such year or during the period from the close of the last preceding year to the date of such removal or resignation, setting forth all investments, receipts, disbursements and other transactions effected by it, including a description of all securities and investments purchased and sold with the cost or net proceeds of such purchases or sales (accrued interest paid or receivable being shown separately), and showing all cash, securities and other property held in the Trust at the end of such year or as of the date of such removal or resignation, as the case may be.

-4-


 

     Section 8. Responsibility of Trustee .
  (a)   Trustee shall act with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting in like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims, provided, however, that Trustee shall incur no liability to any person for any action taken pursuant to a direction, request or approval given by CHS which is contemplated by, and in conformity with, the terms of the Plan or this Trust and is given in writing by CHS. In the event of a dispute between CHS and a party, Trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to resolve the dispute.
 
  (b)   If Trustee undertakes or defends any litigation arising in connection with this Trust, CHS agrees to indemnify Trustee against Trustee’s costs, expenses and liabilities (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses) relating thereto and to be primarily liable for such payments provided that the Trustee did not act dishonestly or in willful or negligent violation of the law or regulation under which such liability, cost or expense arose. If CHS does not pay such costs, expenses and liabilities in a reasonably timely manner, Trustee may obtain payment from the Trust.
 
  (c)   Trustee may consult with legal counsel (who may also be counsel for CHS generally) with respect to any of its duties or obligations hereunder.
 
  (d)   Trustee may hire agents, accountants, actuaries, investment advisors, financial consultants or other professionals to assist it in performing any of its duties or obligations hereunder.
 
  (e)   Trustee shall have, without exclusion, all powers conferred on trustees by applicable law, unless expressly provided otherwise herein, provided, however, that if an insurance policy is held as an asset of the Trust, Trustee shall have no power to name a beneficiary of the policy other than the Trust, to assign the policy (as distinct from conversion of the policy to a different form) other than to a successor Trustee, or to loan to any person the proceeds of any borrowing against such policy.
 
  (f)   Notwithstanding any powers granted to Trustee pursuant to this Trust Agreement or to applicable law, Trustee shall not have any power that could give this Trust the objective of carrying on a business and dividing the gains therefrom, within the meaning of section 301.7701-2 of the Procedure and Administrative Regulations promulgated pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code.

-5-


 

     Section 9. Compensation and Expenses of Trustee . All administrative and Trustee’s fees and expenses shall be paid from the Trust, except to the extent CHS elects to pay such fees and expenses.
     Section 10. Resignation and Removal of Trustee .
  (a)   Trustee may resign at any time by written notice to CHS which shall be effective 30 days after receipt of such notice unless CHS and Trustee agree otherwise.
 
  (b)   Trustee may be removed by CHS on 30 days notice or upon shorter notice accepted by Trustee.
 
  (c)   Upon a Change of Control, as defined herein, Trustee may not be removed by CHS for five (5) years.
 
  (d)   If Trustee resigns within five (5) years after a Change of Control, as defined herein, CHS shall apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor Trustee or for instructions.
 
  (e)   Upon resignation or removal of Trustee and appointment of a successor Trustee, all assets shall subsequently be transferred to the successor Trustee. The transfer shall be completed within 30 days after receipt of notice of resignation, removal or transfer, unless CHS extends the time limit.
 
  (f)   If Trustee resigns or is removed, a successor shall be appointed, in accordance with Section 11 hereof, by the effective date of resignation or removal under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section. If no such appointment has been made, Trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for appointment of a successor or for instructions. All expenses of Trustee in connection with the proceeding shall be allowed as administrative expenses of the Trust.
     Section 11. Appointment of Successor .
  (a)   If Trustee resigns or is removed in accordance with Section 10(a) or (b) hereof, CHS may appoint any third party, such as a bank trust department or other party that may be granted corporate trustee powers under state law, as a successor to replace Trustee upon resignation or removal. The appointment shall be effective when accepted in writing by the new Trustee, who shall have all of the rights and powers of the former Trustee, including ownership rights in the Trust assets. The former Trustee shall execute any instrument necessary or reasonably requested by CHS or the successor Trustee to evidence the transfer.

-6-


 

  (b)   The successor Trustee need not examine the records and acts of any prior Trustee and may retain or dispose of existing Trust assets, subject to Sections 7 and 8 hereof.
     Section 12. Amendment or Termination .
  (a)   This Trust Agreement may be amended by a written instrument executed by Trustee and CHS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such amendment shall conflict with the terms of the Plan or shall make the Trust revocable.
 
  (b)   The Trust shall not terminate until the date on which Plan participants and their beneficiaries are no longer entitled to benefits pursuant to the terms of the Plan. Upon termination of the Trust any assets remaining in the Trust shall be returned to CHS.
 
  (c)   Upon written approval of participants or beneficiaries entitled to payment of benefits pursuant to the terms of the Plan, CHS may terminate this Trust prior to the time all benefit payments under the Plan have been made. All assets in the Trust at termination shall be returned to CHS.
     Section 13. Investments .
  (a)   CHS shall have the responsibility for establishing and carrying out a funding policy and method, consistent with the objectives of the Plan, taking into consideration the Plan’s short-term and long-term financial needs. The Trustee’s responsibility for investment and diversification of the assets in the Trust shall be subject to, and is limited by, the investment instructions issued to it by CHS in accordance with its funding policy. It is understood that, unless otherwise agreed in writing, CHS, rather than the Trustee, shall be responsible for the overall investment of Trust assets.
 
  (b)   The Trustee shall invest and reinvest the Trust fund assets only to the extent and in the manner directed by CHS and confirmed in writing. Communication of any such direction to the Trustee shall be in a manner acceptable to the Trustee and shall conclusively be deemed an authorization to the Trustee’s designee or broker-dealer to implement the direction even though coming from a person other than the Trustee. Neither the Trustee nor any other person shall have liability for following such directions improperly or failing to act in the absence of any such directions. The Trustee shall have no liability for the acts or omissions of CHS directing the investment or reinvestment of Trust Fund assets. Neither shall the Trustee have any duty or obligation to review any such investment or other direction, act, or omission, or except upon receipt of a proper direction, to invest or otherwise manage any assets of the Trust Fund which is subject to the control of CHS. To the extent that CHS has not directed the Trustee as to the investment

-7-


 

      of any portion of Trust assets before they are contributed to the Trust, CHS hereby directs the investment of such assets into the default investment fund specified on an exhibit hereto. CHS hereby acknowledges that (i) the Trustee will be what is commonly known as a “directed trustee”; (ii) the Trustee will not have “some investment discretion” within the meaning of Revenue Procedure 92-64; and (iii) the Trustee has no duty to request or obtain a ruling or other guidance from the Internal Revenue Service or from any other governmental authority as to (or to otherwise determine or monitor) the tax consequences of the form and operation of the Plan, the Plan document, the Trust, or this Trust Agreement, including but not limited to whether the arrangement established hereunder merits the favorable treatment afforded to safe harbor rabbi trusts under Revenue Procedure 92-64 or whether the Plan complies in form and operation with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.
  (c)   At the direction of CHS, the Trustee or the Trustee’s designee or a broker-dealer referred to in Section 5(c), is authorized and empowered:
  (i)   to invest and reinvest principal and income of the Trust in common, preferred, and other stocks of any corporation; voting trust certificates; interests in investment trusts, including, without limiting the generality thereof, participations issued by an investment company as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as from time to time amended; bonds, notes, and debentures, secured or unsecured; mortgages on real or personal property; conditional sales contracts; and real estate and leases;
 
  (ii)   to invest and reinvest principal and income of the Trust through any common or collective trust fund or pooled investment fund maintained by the Trustee for the collective investment of funds held by it in a fiduciary capacity (and the provisions of the documents governing any such common or collective trust fund as it may be amended from time to time shall govern any investment therein and are hereby made a part of this Trust);
 
  (iii)   to invest and reinvest principal and income of the Trust in deposits (including savings accounts, savings certificates, and similar interest bearing instruments or accounts) in itself or its affiliates; and
 
  (iv)   to do all other acts, although not specifically mentioned herein, as the Trustee may deem necessary to carry out any of the foregoing powers and purposes of this Trust Agreement.
  (d)   Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event may the Trustee invest in securities (including stock or rights to acquire stock) or obligations issued by CHS, other

-8-


 

      than a de minimis amount held in common investment vehicles in which the Trustee invests.
     Section 14. Miscellaneous .
  (a)   Any provision of this Trust Agreement prohibited by law shall be ineffective to the extent of any such prohibition, without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof.
 
  (b)   Benefits payable to Plan participants and their beneficiaries under this Trust Agreement may not be anticipated, assigned (either at law or in equity), alienated, pledged, encumbered or subjected to attachment, garnishment, levy, execution or other legal or equitable process.
 
  (c)   This Trust Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
 
  (d)   For purposes of this Trust, Change of Control shall mean the purchase or other acquisition by any person, entity or group of persons, within the meaning of Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), or any comparable successor provisions, of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Act) of 30% or more of either the outstanding shares of common stock or the combined voting power of CHS’ then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally, or the approval by the stockholders of CHS of a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which persons who were stockholders of CHS immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own more than 50% of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the reorganized, merged or consolidated CHS’ then outstanding securities, or a liquidation or dissolution of CHS or of the sale of all or substantially all of CHS’ assets.
     Section 15. Effective Date . The effective date of this Trust Agreement shall be the date first written above.

-9-


 

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CHS Inc. has caused its name to be hereunto subscribed by John D. Johnson, its President and CEO, and U.S. Bank has caused its name to be hereto subscribed, as Trustee, by its Michelle Carlson and Deborah Burnett this 31 day of March, 2010.

-10-


 

         
  CHS INC.
 
 
  By   /s/ John D. Johnson    
    Its President and CEO   
       
  U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
 
  By   /s/ Michelle Carlson    
    Its Vice President   
       
  By   /s/ Deborah Burnett    
    Its Assistant Vice President   
       
 

-11-

Exhibit 10.3
CHS INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
(2010 RESTATEMENT)
ARTICLE I.
INTRODUCTION
     Section 1.1. Amendment and Restatement . Effective January 1, 1999, CHS Inc. merged and restated the CENEX Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the Harvest States Deferred Compensation Supplemental Retirement Plan for the purpose of providing benefits for certain of its employees who participate in the CHS Inc. Pension Plan and are part of a select group of management or highly compensated employees. The Plan has since been amended by seven (7) amendments. The Plan is hereby amended and restated to consolidate all amendments into one restatement, effective upon adoption by the Board of Directors.
     Section 1.2. Purpose . CHS Inc. maintains the CHS Inc. Pension Plan which is intended to meet the requirements of a “qualified plan” under the Internal Revenue Code. Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the amount of annual compensation of each employee that may be taken into account under a qualified plan and Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code limits the benefits payable under a qualified plan. The purpose of the CHS Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is to provide benefits to eligible employees that would be provided under the CHS Inc. Pension Plan but which are not provided thereunder because of the compensation limitations and any other benefit limitations imposed on those plans by the Internal Revenue Code.
ARTICLE II.
DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
     Section 2.1. Definitions . When used in this Plan document, the following terms have the meanings indicated unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context.
     “Active Participant” means a Participant in the Plan who is identified as an Active Participant under Article III of the Plan.
     “Actuarial Value” means the single sum value of a benefit under the Plan determined by the same actuarial adjustments as those specified in the Pension Plan with respect to the determination of the single sum value of a benefit payable under the Pension Plan on the date for commencement of payment of the benefit under this Plan.
     “Beneficiary” means the person or persons who are the beneficiary of a Participant under the terms of the Pension Plan.
     “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of CHS.

 


 

     “CHS” means CHS Inc. (formerly known as Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives) and any successor thereto, and any of its subsidiaries or affiliated business entities which are treated as one employer with that corporation under the provisions contained in Section 414 of the Code.
     “CENEX SERP” means the CENEX Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
     “Committee” means the committee described in Section 6.4 of the Plan.
     “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
     “ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
     “Harvest States SERP” means the Harvest States Deferred Compensation Supplemental Retirement Plan.
     “Participant” means a person who is an Active Participant or is or may become entitled to an immediate or deferred benefit under the Plan by reason of having been an Active Participant.
     “Pension Plan” means the CHS Inc. Pension Plan (formerly known as the Cenex Harvest States Pension Plan).
     “Pension Plan Account” means an account established under Section 4.2 of the Plan.
     “Plan” means the CHS Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (formerly known as the Cenex Harvest States Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan), including any amendments thereto, which is operated and maintained by CHS primarily for the purpose of providing supplemental retirement benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated employees. Prior to January 1, 1999, “Plan” refers to the two plans which have been merged in this document, referred to as the CENEX Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the Harvest States Deferred Compensation Supplemental Retirement Plan.
     “Plan Year” means the plan year used by the Pension Plan, which is the calendar year as of the date of execution of this document.
     “Surviving Spouse” means the person who is married to a Participant throughout the one year period ending on the date of such Participant’s death.

- 2 -


 

     Section 2.2. Performance of Obligations . CHS agrees to perform its obligations in accordance with the Plan.
     Section 2.3. Gender and Number . The singular form of any word will include the plural and the masculine gender will include the feminine wherever necessary for the proper interpretation of this Plan.
ARTICLE III.
PARTICIPATION
     Section 3.1 Eligibility and Participation . Any individual who was a Participant in the Plan on December 31, 1998, shall continue to be a Participant until the Plan causes the individual to cease to be a Participant. Further, any individual who was an Active Participant on that date shall continue to be an Active Participant. The President and Chief Executive Officer of CHS may also select other executives of CHS who will become Active Participants in the Plan and will designate the date on which such an executive will become an Active Participant in the Plan. The President and Chief Executive Officer may withhold participation for any reason with respect to any executive of CHS.
     Section 3.2 Status as Active Participant . The President and Chief Executive Officer of CHS may by written statement and notice to an executive who is an Active Participant cause such Participant to cease to accrue benefits under the Plan prior to the Participant’s termination of employment with CHS. If the President and Chief Executive Officer takes that action with respect to such a Participant, there shall be no further accrual of benefits under this Plan on behalf of such Participant and the Participant’s benefits under this Plan shall thereafter be computed as if the Plan terminated on the date of such written notice to the Participant.
     Section 3.3 Status as Participant . A person who becomes an Active Participant will remain a Participant in the Plan until all benefits payable to such person under the Plan have been distributed.
ARTICLE IV.
BENEFITS
     Section 4.1. Amount of Benefits . A supplemental retirement benefit will be payable to a Participant under this Article IV. The amount of the Participant’s benefit under the Plan shall be the sum of all amounts credited to accounts established in the Participant’s name under this Article IV, unless the Participant’s benefit is to be determined in a different manner as specified below with respect to certain “grandfathered” Participants.
     Section 4.2. Pension Plan Account Each Participant will have a Pension Plan Account to which amounts will be credited under this Section 4.2.
     (a)  Initial Account Balance . Each individual who is a Participant in the Plan as of January 1, 1999, shall have an initial account balance as of that date in the Participant’s Pension Plan Account which will be determined as follows:

- 3 -


 

     (1) The initial account balance of Participants who had an account balance in the “cash balance make-up account” under the Harvest States SERP as of December 31, 1998, shall be the greater of:
     A) that account balance, or
     B) the Actuarial Value as of December 31, 1998, of a benefit for the Participant determined as of the same date using Section 4.3(c) of the Plan and the following assumptions: (i) that the Participant had been a participant in the CENEX Pension Plan through 1998, and (ii) the Participant’s service with and compensation from Harvest States Cooperatives had actually been with and from CENEX, Inc.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.2(a)(1)(B), if a Participant was an officer of Harvest States Cooperatives on January 1, 1990, then the formula used for the determination under that subsection shall be the formula used in Section 4.4(b) of the Plan.
     (2) The initial account balance of a Participant who was a participant in the CENEX SERP as of December 31,1998, shall be equal to the greater of:
     A) the Actuarial Value of the Participant’s accrued benefit under the CENEX SERP as of December 31, 1998; or
     B) the difference between (i) four percent (4%) multiplied by the Participant’s “CPP Final Average Compensation” as of that date, except that such amount will be determined without applying any limits under Section 401(a)(17) of the Code, multiplied by the Participant’s “CPP Credited Service” as of that date and (ii) four percent (4%) multiplied by the Participant’s “CPP Final Average Compensation” as of that date multiplied by the Participant’s “CPP Credited Service” as of that date.
However, Paragraphs (2)(A) and (2) (B) shall each be reduced by the Actuarial Value of any offset applicable to the Participant under the CENEX Pension Plan definition of accrued benefit as of December 31, 1998. Further, the phrases within quotation marks in Subsections (a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(B) shall have the meaning given to them under the Pension Plan.
     (b)  Contribution Credits . Each December 31, an Active Participant’s Pension Plan Account shall be credited with a contribution credit equal to the difference, if any, between:
     (1) the amount of the Active Participant’s contribution credit which would have been credited under the Pension Plan as of that date if the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the Code on the Pension Plan were disregarded and if compensation deferred upon the election of the Participant under any nonqualified plan maintained by CHS or any other participating employer in the Pension Plan were to be taken into account as compensation under the Pension Plan, except that

- 4 -


 

amounts deferred or paid under the mandatory deferral portion of any long term incentive compensation program maintained by such an employer or any amounts paid under any other nonqualified plan or program maintained by CHS or such a participating employer will not be considered part of that compensation, and
     (2) the actual amount of such Active Participant’s contribution credit that is credited under the provisions of the Pension Plan as of such date.
     (c)  Special Career Credits . Each December 31, an Active Participant’s Pension Plan Account shall be credited with a special career credit equal to the difference, if any, between:
     (1) the amount of the Active Participant’s special career credit which would have been credited under the Pension Plan as of that date if the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the Code on the Pension Plan were disregarded and if compensation deferred upon the election of the Participant under any nonqualified plan maintained by CHS or any other participating employer in the Pension Plan were to be taken into account as compensation under the Pension Plan, except that amounts deferred or paid under the mandatory deferral portion of any long term incentive compensation program maintained by such an employer or any amounts paid under any other nonqualified plan or program maintained by CHS or such a participating employer will not be considered part of that compensation, and
     (2) the actual amount of such Active Participant’s special career credit that is credited under the provisions of the Pension Plan as of such date.
     (d)  Investment Credits . As of the end of each Plan Year, each Participant’s Pension Plan Account shall be credited with an amount referred to as an investment credit which shall be equal to (1) an “investment percentage” multiplied by (2) the Participant’s Pension Plan Account balance determined as of the first day of that year. Such Investment Credits shall be credited until distributions commence under the Plan. If the period for crediting the investment credits is less than 12 months, such as on account of a distribution to the Participant, pro rata investment credits shall be credited. The “investment percentage” shall be the investment percentage in effect during such Plan Year under the Pension Plan.
     (e)  Adjustment for Certain Participants . Notwithstanding the prior provisions of this Section 4.2 related to credits for the Pension Plan Account, a Participant that receives a benefit under Section 6.13 of the Pension Plan and whose benefit under the Plan is determined in part under this Section, shall, at the time a Participant’s benefit commences, have his or her Pension Plan Account reduced by an amount, not less than zero, equal to the difference between:
     (1) the Actuarial Value of the benefit actually payable from the Pension Plan; and
     (2) the Actuarial Value of the benefit which would have been payable from the Pension Plan without applying Section 6.13 of the Pension Plan.

- 5 -


 

     Section 4.3. Exceptions for Certain Former CENEX Employees .
     (a)  Eligibility for Exception . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.2 of the Plan, a Participant who is a former employee of CENEX, Inc., is a CHS employee on January 1, 1999, is a Participant in the Pension Plan as of that date, has reached age 50 as of that date, and has been credited with 10 years of “CENEX Credited Service” (that phrase shall have the meaning given to it under that plan) as of December 31, 1998, shall be eligible to receive the benefits described in this section.
     (b)  Additional Benefits . If a Participant described in Subsection (a) becomes entitled to an additional benefit under the Pension Plan during the period from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2001, because of satisfying that description, such Participant will be entitled to an additional benefit under this Plan. The Actuarial Value of that benefit will be an amount (not less than zero) which will be determined as of the day the Participant’s benefit is to begin under the Pension Plan and will be equal to the difference between:
     (1) the Actuarial Value of such additional benefit which the Participant would have been entitled to receive under the Pension Plan if the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the Code on the Pension Plan were disregarded and if compensation deferred upon the election of the Participant under any nonqualified plan maintained by CHS or any other participating employer in the Pension Plan were to be taken into account as compensation under the Pension Plan, except that amounts deferred or paid under the mandatory deferral portion of any long term incentive compensation program maintained by such an employer or any amounts paid under any other nonqualified plan or program maintained by CHS or such a participating employer will not be considered part of that compensation, and
     (2) the Actuarial Value of such additional benefit actually payable to the Participant under the Pension Plan.
     (c)  Election and Alternative Benefit . If, during the ninety day period ending on November 30, 2001, a Participant described in Subsection (a) makes an election under the Pension Plan to have the Participant’s benefit determined under the CENEX Pension Plan accrued benefit formula, then the provisions of Section 4.2 of this Plan shall not be applicable to the Participant. Instead, the Participant will be entitled to a different benefit. The amount of that benefit will be a monthly amount (not less than zero) which will be determined as of the day the Participant’s benefit is to begin under the Pension Plan and will be equal to the difference between:
     (1) the monthly amount which the Participant would have been entitled to receive under the Pension Plan if the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the Code on the Pension Plan were disregarded and if compensation deferred upon the election of the Participant under any nonqualified plan maintained by CHS or any other participating employer in the Pension Plan were to be taken into account as compensation under the Pension Plan, except that amounts deferred or paid under the mandatory deferral portion of any long term incentive compensation program maintained by such an employer or any amounts paid under any other nonqualified plan or program maintained by CHS or such a participating employer will not be considered part of that compensation, and

- 6 -


 

     (2) the monthly amount of the benefit actually payable to the Participant under the Pension Plan.
     Section 4.4. Adjustments .
     (a)  Adjustment for Service with Another Participating Employer in Pension Plan . Any portion of the benefit computed under Section 4.2 or Section 4.3 of the Plan that is attributable to service with a participating employer in the Pension Plan other than CHS will not be payable under this Plan. That portion will be considered to be proportional to the portion of the Participant’s accrued benefit under the Pension Plan which was accrued during such Participant’s service with such a participating employer.
     (b)  Adjustment for Certain Former Officers of CENEX, Inc. If a Participant was employed as an officer of Farmers Union Central Exchange, Incorporated as of January 1, 1989, the Actuarial Value of the Participant’s benefit determined under whichever of Section 4.2 or Section 4.3(c) of the Plan is applicable to the Participant will be increased to the Actuarial Value of the amount determined under Section 4.3(c) of the Plan using CENEX Pension Plan (then referred to as the Farmers Union Central Exchange, Incorporated Pension Plan) provisions as in effect on December 31, 1988 (except that the compensation definition ordinarily used under Section 4.3(c) of the Plan will be used in calculating that amount), if the latter amount is larger than determined under the applicable provision without application of this sentence.
     (c)  Special Benefits for Robert Oebser . The additional benefit computed for Robert Oebser under Section 4.3 shall be computed as if his first day of employment was May 31, 1983, and his birth date was December 28, 1937.
     (d)  Surviving Spouse Benefit of Former CEO . In return for valuable services provided by John McKay, a long-time employee and former Chief Executive Officer of CHS, the surviving spouse of John McKay, Juanita McKay, shall be paid a benefit of $500.00 per month for as long as she shall live. The monthly payments will commence as of July 1, 2006, and subsequent monthly payments will be made as of the first day of every month thereafter.
     (e)  Cofina Financial, LLC . In connection with CHS’ acquisition of one hundred percent (100%) of Cofina Financial, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Cofina”), CHS assumed all deferred compensation obligations under the Cofina Financial, LLC Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“Cofina SERP”). Prior to such acquisition, Cofina was (and continues to be) a participating employer in the CHS Inc. Pension Plan. The Cofina SERP is (like the CHS SERP) a nonqualified defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits that would be provided under the CHS Inc. Pension Plan but which are not provided thereunder because of the compensation limitations under Section 401(a)(17) (compensation limit) and Section 414 (exclusion of deferred compensation from pensionable earnings) of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as the annual addition limitations under and Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Cofina SERP is, in all material respects, identical to the CHS SERP. Accordingly, each Cofina SERP Participant’s Pension Plan Account under the Cofina Plan shall be merged with and into the CHS Plan, and such account shall become the Participant’s opening Pension Plan Account under the CHS Plan as of September 1, 2008 (the “Merger Date”). (No Cofina SERP Participants have accrued benefits determined under an alternative, traditional

- 7 -


 

pension formula; rather, all benefits are determined under a “cash balance” formula.) Effective as of the Merger Date, Cofina shall become a participating employer in the CHS SERP. With respect to each eligible employee of Cofina who is selected to become an Active Participant in the CHS SERP, such Participant’s service and compensation earned with Cofina both before and after the Merger Date shall be taken into account for purposes of determining such Participant’s contribution credits and special career credits under the CHS SERP.
     Section 4.5. Payment of Benefit .
     (a)  Time of Payment . The Actuarial Value of the benefit payable under this Article IV will be paid in a single lump sum upon a Participant’s benefit distribution date. For this purpose, the term “benefit distribution date” shall mean the date that is six (6) months after the Participant’s separation from service (as defined below). Payment shall be deemed paid as of the benefit distribution date, or if later, the 15th day of the third calendar month following the benefit distribution date.
“Separation from service” shall mean the separation from service (within the meaning of Treas. Regs. § 1.409A 1(h)) with CHS, voluntarily or involuntarily, for any reason other than retirement, disability or death. Whether a separation from service has occurred is determined under Section 409A of the Code and Treasury Regulation 1.409A 1(h) (i.e., whether the facts and circumstances indicate that the employer and the employee reasonably anticipated that no further services would be performed after a certain date or that the level of bona fide services the employee would perform after such date (whether as an employee or independent contractor) would permanently decrease to no more than twenty percent (20%) of the average level of bona fide services performed (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) over the immediately preceding thirty six (36) month period (or the full period of services to the employer if the employee has been providing services to the employer less than thirty six (36) months)). Separation from service shall not be deemed to occur while the employee is on military leave, sick leave or other bona fide leave of absence if the period does not exceed six (6) months or, if longer, so long as the employee retains a right to reemployment with CHS under an applicable statute or by contract. For this purpose, a leave is bona fide only if, and so long as, there is a reasonable expectation that the employee will return to perform services for CHS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a twenty nine (29) month period of absence will be substituted for such six (6) month period if the leave is due to any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of no less than six (6) months and that causes the employee to be unable to perform the duties of his or her position of employment. For this purpose, “CHS” is the Participant’s employer and all persons with whom the employer would be considered a single employer under Sections 414(b) and 414(c) of the Code; provided that, in applying Sections 1563(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Code for purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Section 414(b) of the Code, the language “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of “at least 80 percent” each place it appears therein, and in applying Treas. Regs. § 1.414(c) 2 for purposes of determining trades or businesses that are under common control for purposes of Section 414(c) of the Code, “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of “at least 80 percent” each place it appears therein. If a Participant is both an employee and a director, a separation from service shall occur only upon the termination of the last position held.

- 8 -


 

     (b)  Grandfathered Participants . With respect to any “grandfathered” Participant whose benefit is computed under a traditional defined benefit formula pursuant to Section 4.3(c) (and not as an account balance benefit under Section 4.2), the Actuarial Value shall be determined as of the separation date, and then such single sum shall be credited with interest for the period beginning on the separation date and ending on the payment date (based on the applicable interest rate under Section 417(e) of the Code, using the first segment rate applicable for the look-back month and stability period used under the Pension Plan).
     (c)  409A Compliance; 409A Grandfathered Participants . Between January 1, 2005 and July 1, 2006 (the effective date of the amendment bringing the Plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Code), the Plan was operated and administered in compliance with transition rules promulgated by the Treasury under Notice 2005-1 and proposed regulations. Effective July 1, 2006, the Plan was amended to comply with Section 409A of the Code with respect to both the portion of the Participant’s benefit that is “grandfathered” from application of Section 409A of the Code ( i.e. the portion that was earned and vested as of December 31, 2004) and the portion that is subject to Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any Participant whose entire benefit payable under this Plan is grandfathered from application of Section 409A of the Code ( i.e. the entire benefit was both earned and vested as of December 31, 2004), such Participant’s entire benefit shall continue to be payable in accordance with the terms of the Plan as existed prior to January 1, 2005.
     Section 4.6. Impact of Ceasing to be an Active Participant . In the event that a Participant ceases to be an Active Participant as of a date but does not incur a termination of employment with CHS, then the amount described in this Article IV will be determined as if the Participant did not accumulate any additional service after that date and did not have any increase in compensation after that date.
     Section 4.7. Termination of Pension Plan . If the Pension Plan is terminated by CHS, the benefit payable to a Participant under this Article IV with respect to the terminated plan, if any, will be determined as of the termination date of the terminated plan as if the Participant incurred a termination of employment with CHS as of such date and no other benefit will be provided under this Article IV with respect to the terminated plan.
ARTICLE V.
DEATH BENEFITS
     Section 5.1. Normal Death Benefit .
     (a)  Death Benefit for Beneficiary . In the event of a Participant’s death prior to payment of benefits under the Plan, the Participant’s Beneficiary will be entitled to a death benefit. The death benefit is 100% of the Participant’s account balances described in Article IV of the Plan. If the Participant was eligible for the grandfathered benefit described in Section 4.5 of the Plan, the death benefit attributable to the Participant’s Pension Plan Account Balance is the greater of the Participant’s Pension Plan Account balance or the Actuarial Value of the Participant’s grandfathered benefit as provided by Section 4.5 of the Plan.
     (b)  Payment of Benefit . The Actuarial Value of the benefit described in Subsection

- 9 -


 

(a) will be paid to the Participant’s Beneficiary in a single lump sum upon the Participant’s death. Payment shall be deemed paid as of the Participant’s death if it is made no later than the last day of the calendar year in which occurs the Participant’s death, or if later, the 15th day of the third calendar month following the Participant’s death.
     (c)  Death of Beneficiary . If a Beneficiary becomes entitled to a benefit under the preceding provision of this section and thereafter dies prior to the time payments begin to such Beneficiary, the death benefit shall be paid to the Beneficiary’s estate, unless the Participant specifically provided otherwise in the Participant’s designation of beneficiary under the Pension Plan, in which case, the death benefit will be paid to that designated beneficiary.
     Section 5.2. Exceptions for Certain Former CENEX Employees .
     (a)  Application of this Section . If a Participant is covered by Section 4.3 of the Plan, then Section 5.1 of the Plan won’t apply and this section will apply with respect to the Participant.
     (b)  Surviving Spouse Benefit . If a Participant who is described in Subsection (a) dies prior to payment of benefits under the Plan under circumstances in which a benefit is payable to the Surviving Spouse of the Participant pursuant to the Pension Plan, then a supplemental benefit is payable to the Surviving Spouse under this Plan. The monthly amount of such benefit payable to the Surviving Spouse will be an amount, not less than zero, equal to the difference between:
     (1) the monthly amount which the Surviving Spouse would have been entitled to receive under the Pension Plan if the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the Code on the Pension Plan were disregarded and if compensation deferred upon the election of the Participant under any nonqualified plan maintained by CHS or any other participating employer in the Pension Plan were to be taken into account as compensation under the Pension Plan, except that amounts deferred or paid under the mandatory deferral portion of any long term incentive compensation program maintained by such an employer, or any amounts paid under any other nonqualified plan or program maintained by CHS or such a participating employer will not be considered part of that compensation, and
     (2) the monthly amount actually payable to the Surviving Spouse under the Pension Plan.
     (c)  Payment of Benefit . The Actuarial Value of the benefit payable under this Section 5.2 of the Plan will be paid to the Surviving Spouse under the Pension Plan in a single lump sum upon the Participant’s death. Payment shall be deemed paid as of the Participant’s death if it is made no later than the last day of the calendar year in which occurs the Participant’s death, or if later, the 15th day of the third calendar month following the Participant’s death.
     (d)  Participant Ceases to be Active Participant . In the event that a Participant ceases to be an Active Participant as of a date but does not incur a termination of employment with CHS, and a supplemental benefit is payable to the Surviving Spouse under this Section 5.2, then the amount described in Section 5.2(b) of the Plan will be determined as if the Participant did not accumulate any additional service after that date and did not have any increase in compensation

- 10 -


 

after that date.
     (e)  Exception for Certain Officers . If the Participant was employed as an officer of Farmers Union Central Exchange, Incorporated as of January 1, 1989, the monthly amount determined under Section 5.2(b) of the Plan will be increased to the amount determined under that subsection using CENEX Pension Plan (then referred to as the Farmers Union Central Exchange, Incorporated Pension Plan) provisions as in effect on December 31, 1988 (except that the compensation definition ordinarily used under Section 5.2(b) of the Plan will be used in calculating that amount), if such amount is larger than determined under that subsection without application of this sentence.
     Section 5.3. Exclusion for Service with other Participating Employers in Pension Plan . Any portion of the benefit computed under this Article V that is attributable to service of a Participant with a participating employer in the Pension Plan other than CHS will not be payable under this Plan. That portion will be considered to be proportional to the portion of the Participant’s accrued benefit under the Pension Plan which was accrued during such Participant’s service with such a participating employer.
     Section 5.4. Termination of Pension Plan . If the Pension Plan is terminated by CHS, the benefit payable to a Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse under this Article V, if any, will be determined as of the termination date of the Pension Plan and no other benefit will be provided under this Article V.
ARTICLE VI.
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
     Section 6.1. Interpretation . The Plan will be administered by CHS, which will have the authority, duty and power to interpret and construe the provisions of the Plan as it deems appropriate. CHS will have the duty and responsibility of maintaining records, making the requisite calculations and dispersing the payments hereunder. CHS’s interpretations, determinations, regulations and calculations will be final and binding on all persons and parties concerned.
     Section 6.2. General Administration and Claims Procedure . CHS will be responsible for the general operation and administration of the Plan and for carrying out the provisions thereof. CHS will have the authority to establish and revise rules, procedures, and regulations relating to the Plan and to make any other determinations which it believes necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. CHS will be responsible for the expenses incurred in the administration of the Plan. CHS will also be responsible for determining eligibility for benefits and the benefits payable pursuant to the Plan. CHS will be entitled to rely conclusively upon all tables, valuations, certificates, opinions and reports furnished by any actuary, accountant, controller, counsel or other person employed or engaged by CHS with respect to the Plan. The procedures for filing claims for Plan benefits are described below. For claims procedures purposes, the “Claims Manager” will be CHS.
     (a)  Initial Claim . An initial claim for benefits under the Plan must be made by the Participant or his or her Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse in accordance with the terms of the

- 11 -


 

Plan. If for any reason a claim for benefits under this Plan is denied by the Claims Manager, the Claims Manager will deliver to the claimant a written explanation setting forth the specific reasons for the denial, pertinent references to the section under the Plan on which the denial is based, such other data as may be pertinent and information on the procedures to be followed by the claimant in obtaining a review of his or her claim, all written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. For this purpose:
     (1) The claimant’s claim will be deemed to be filed when presented orally or in writing to the Claims Manager.
     (2) The Claims Manager’s explanation will be in writing delivered to the claimant within 90 days of the date the claim is filed.
     (b)  Request for Review . The claimant will have 60 days following his or her receipt of the denial of the claim to file with the Claims Manager a written request for review of the denial. For such review, the claimant or the claimant’s representative may review pertinent documents and submit written issues and comments.
     (c)  Decision after Review . The Claims Manager will decide the issue on review and furnish the claimant with a copy within 60 days of receipt of the claimant’s request for review of the claimant’s claim. The decision on review will be in writing and will include specific reasons for the decision, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, as well as specific references to the pertinent provisions in the Plan on which the decision is based. If a copy of the decision is not so furnished to the claimant within such 60 days, the claim will be deemed denied on review. In no event may a claimant commence legal action for benefits the claimant believes are due the claimant until the claimant has exhausted all of the remedies and procedures afforded the claimant by this Article VI.
     Section 6.3. Written Statement . CHS may provide individual written statements of accrued benefits to each Participant, or current Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse, in a form determined by CHS at such times as may be established by CHS.
     Section 6.4. Committee . A Committee consisting of one (1) or more members appointed by the Board of Directors will act for CHS under the Plan, unless the Plan specifically indicates that the Board of Directors or other persons are to act for CHS with respect to a specified matter under the Plan. If such Board does not appoint anyone to the Committee or if all members resign or otherwise cease to be members of the Committee, such Board or any officer designated by the Board will act for CHS until it makes any appointments under this section.
     Section 6.5. Records . The records of the Plan will be maintained on the Plan Year.
ARTICLE VII.
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION
     Section 7.1. Amendment or Termination . CHS intends the Plan to be permanent but reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Any such amendment or termination will be made pursuant to a resolution of CHS’s Board of Directors and will be

- 12 -


 

effective as of the date provided in the resolution. An amendment will be stated in an instrument in writing signed in the name of CHS by a person authorized by the Board of Directors and all parties interested herein will be bound thereby.
     Section 7.2. Impact on Benefits . No amendment or termination of the Plan will directly or indirectly reduce any benefit described in Article IV or Article V of the Plan as of the effective date of such amendment or termination. A Participant’s benefit which has accrued under the Plan will not increase after the termination of the Plan and will be determined under the appropriate provisions of the Plan as if the Participant did not accumulate any additional service after the effective date of such termination and did not have any increase in compensation after that date. Upon the termination of the Plan, distribution of benefits payable under the Plan will be made to the Participants or their Beneficiaries or Surviving Spouses in accordance with Article IVof the Plan.
ARTICLE VIII.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
     Section 8.1. Responsibility for Benefits and Expenses . CHS will pay benefits arising under the Plan and all costs, charges and expenses related thereto. CHS may anticipate its obligations under this Plan by establishing a trust or purchasing any insurance or other contract; provided, however, that such “funding” vehicle will not:
     (a) change the status of this Plan as an unfunded plan, or
     (b) change the rights of a Participant or the Participant’s Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse under Section 8.3 of the Plan.
     Section 8.2. Inalienability . The benefits payable hereunder or the right to receive future benefits under the Plan may not be anticipated, alienated, sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, encumbered, or subjected to any charge or legal process; and no interest or right to receive a benefit may be taken, either voluntarily or involuntarily, for the satisfaction of the debts of, or other obligations or claims against, such person or entity, including claims for alimony, support, separate maintenance and claims in bankruptcy proceedings.
     Section 8.3. Unsecured Claim . The right of a Participant or the Participant’s Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse to receive a distribution hereunder will be an unsecured claim against the general assets of CHS, and neither a Participant nor his or her Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse will have any rights in or against any amount credited to any accounts under the Plan or any other assets of CHS. The Plan will at all times be considered entirely unfunded both for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I of ERISA. Funds invested hereunder will continue for all purposes to be part of the general assets of CHS and available to the general creditors of CHS in the event of CHS’s bankruptcy (when CHS is involved in a pending proceeding under the Federal Bankruptcy Code) or insolvency (when CHS is unable to pay its debts as they mature). No Participant or any other person will have any interests in any particular assets of CHS by reason of the right to receive a benefit under the Plan. The Plan constitutes a mere promise by CHS to make payments to the Participants in the future.
     Section 8.4. Terms of Pension Plan . Except as otherwise provided herein, the terms

- 13 -


 

and conditions of the Pension Plan will apply to the benefits described in Articles IV and V of the Plan. Nothing in this Plan will operate or be construed in any way to modify, amend or affect the terms and provisions of the Pension Plan.
     Section 8.5. Sufficiency of CHS Assets . Nothing contained in the Plan will be interpreted as a guaranty by CHS or any other person or entity that any funds or assets of CHS will be sufficient to pay any benefit hereunder.
     Section 8.6. Plan Administered According to its Terms . No Participant, Beneficiary, or Surviving Spouse will have any right to a benefit under this Plan except in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Establishment of the Plan will not be construed to give any Participant the right to be retained in the service of CHS. The sole rights of a Participant or his or her Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse under the Plan will be to have the Plan administered according to its terms, and to receive whatever benefits he or she may be entitled to hereunder.
     Section 8.7. Incompetency . If any person entitled to a benefit payment under the Plan is declared incompetent and a conservator or other person legally charged with the care of such person or of his or her estate is appointed, any benefits under the Plan to which the person is entitled will be paid to such conservator or other person legally charged with the care of the person or his or her estate. Except as provided above, when CHS determines that such person is unable to manage his or her affairs, CHS may provide for such payment or any part thereof to be made to any other person or institution then contributing toward or providing for the care and maintenance of such person. Any such payment will be a payment for the account of such person and a complete discharge of any liability of CHS and the Plan therefore.
     Section 8.8. Impact of Corporate Change . The Plan will not be automatically terminated by a transfer or sale of assets of CHS or by the merger or consolidation of CHS into or with any other corporation or other entity, but the Plan will be continued after such sale, merger or consolidation only if and to the extent that the transferee, purchaser or successor entity agrees to continue the Plan. In the event the Plan is not continued by the transferee, purchaser or successor entity, then the Plan will terminate subject to the provisions of Article VII of the Plan.
     Section 8.9. Addresses . Each Participant will keep CHS informed of his or her current address and the current address of his or her spouse and any designated Beneficiary. CHS will not be obligated to search for any person. If the location of a Participant is not made known to CHS within two (2) years after the date on which payment of the Participant’s benefits payable under this Plan may first be made, payment may be made as though the Participant had died at the end of the two-year period. If, within one additional year after such two-year period has elapsed, or, within two (2) years after the actual death of a Participant, whichever is later, CHS is unable to locate the Surviving Spouse or a designated Beneficiary of the Participant, then CHS will have no further obligation to pay any benefit hereunder to such Participant, Surviving Spouse, or designated Beneficiary and such benefits will be irrevocably forfeited to CHS.
     Section 8.10. Liability . Notwithstanding any of the preceding provisions of the Plan, neither CHS nor any individual acting as an employee or agent of CHS will be liable to any Participant, former Participant, Surviving Spouse, or any other person for any claim, loss, liability or expense incurred in connection with the Plan, unless attributable to fraud or willful

- 14 -


 

misconduct on the part of CHS or any such employee or agent of CHS.
     Section 8.11. Availability of Copy of Plan . CHS will make a copy of the Plan available for inspection by any Participant or designated Beneficiary or Surviving Spouse.
     Section 8.12. Applicable Laws . All questions pertaining to the construction, validity and effect of the Plan will be determined in accordance with the laws of the United States and to the extent not preempted by such laws, by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
     Section 8.13. Invalidated Provision . Any provision of this Plan prohibited by law will be ineffective to the extent of any such prohibition, without invalidating the remaining provisions of the Plan.
     Executed this 13 day of May, 2010.
         
  CHS INC.
 
 
  By:   /s/ John D. Johnson    
    Title: President and CEO   
       
 

- 15 -

Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
I, John D. Johnson, certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CHS Inc. for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: July 8, 2010
 
/s/  John D. Johnson
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
I, John Schmitz, certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CHS Inc. for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: July 8, 2010
 
/s/  John Schmitz
John Schmitz
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CHS Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
/s/  John D. Johnson
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 8, 2010

Exhibit 32.2
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CHS Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Schmitz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
/s/  John Schmitz
John Schmitz
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 8, 2010