þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Delaware | 95-4376145 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
228 Manhattan Beach Blvd. | ||
Manhattan Beach, California | 90266 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Office) | (Zip Code) |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ITEM 1.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
June 30,
December 31,
2010
2009
ASSETS
$
273,266
$
265,675
0
30,000
304,992
219,924
7,526
12,177
312,518
232,101
219,360
224,050
30,012
28,233
8,950
8,950
844,106
789,009
236,709
171,667
8,147
9,011
13,667
13,660
33,213
12,205
$
1,135,842
$
995,552
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$
1,956
$
2,006
15,899
529
191,653
196,163
22,142
31,843
231,650
230,541
14,532
15,641
246,182
246,182
0
0
36
34
11
13
295,857
272,662
(1,067
)
9,348
560,398
463,865
855,235
745,922
34,425
3,448
889,660
749,370
$
1,135,842
$
995,552
Table of Contents
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three-Months Ended June 30,
Six-Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
504,859
$
298,976
$
997,623
$
642,446
267,214
176,373
522,560
394,414
237,645
122,603
475,063
248,032
875
332
1,260
604
238,520
122,935
476,323
248,636
52,437
34,813
86,746
56,323
127,299
95,848
249,786
193,886
179,736
130,661
336,532
250,209
58,784
(7,726
)
139,791
(1,573
)
436
581
1,864
1,290
(118
)
(912
)
(833
)
(957
)
1,611
245
1,820
27
1,929
(86
)
2,851
360
60,713
(7,812
)
142,642
(1,213
)
20,396
(1,186
)
46,202
(1,939
)
40,317
(6,626
)
96,440
726
80
(699
)
(93
)
(1,567
)
$
40,237
$
(5,927
)
$
96,533
$
2,293
$
0.85
$
(0.13
)
$
2.05
$
0.05
$
0.82
$
(0.13
)
$
1.97
$
0.05
47,422
46,282
47,107
46,252
49,130
46,282
48,955
46,424
$
40,237
$
(5,927
)
$
96,533
$
2,293
0
10,234
0
8,151
(6,147
)
6,836
(10,415
)
3,874
$
34,090
$
11,143
$
86,118
$
14,318
Table of Contents
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Six-Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
$
96,533
$
2,293
(93
)
(1,567
)
10,870
9,337
741
0
892
410
3,135
(352
)
0
0
6,665
1,210
50
2
(12
)
(605
)
0
761
(91,260
)
(17,288
)
3,718
71,199
(2,215
)
(548
)
(22,555
)
(1,357
)
(5,058
)
11,012
(9,381
)
(6,173
)
(7,970
)
68,334
(29,721
)
(26,860
)
30,000
375
0
95,250
(31
)
0
248
68,765
10,772
958
(281
)
(166
)
(61
)
639
1,000
3,000
5,758
17,188
4,431
9,466
141,530
(1,875
)
553
265,675
114,941
$
273,266
$
257,024
$
1,512
$
1,978
53,343
1,030
30,000
0
14,567
0
Table of Contents
JUNE 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2010
December 31, 2009
$
4,178
$
0
75,990
0
$
80,168
$
0
$
5,584
$
0
14,567
0
$
20,151
$
0
Table of Contents
Three-Months Ended June 30,
Six-Months Ended June 30,
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
40,317
$
(6,626
)
$
96,440
$
726
0
10,234
0
8,151
(6,120
)
6,881
(10,350
)
3,899
34,197
10,489
86,090
12,776
(107
)
(654
)
28
(1,542
)
$
34,090
$
11,143
$
86,118
$
14,318
Table of Contents
(5)
STOCK COMPENSATION
WEIGHTED
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
AGGREGATE
AVERAGE
REMAINING
INTRINSIC
SHARES
EXERCISE PRICE
CONTRACTUAL TERM
VALUE
1,505,694
$
12.01
0
0
(838,283
)
12.56
(24,791
)
3.94
642,620
11.61
1.9 years
$
16,008,636
642,620
11.61
1.9 years
$
16,008,636
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GRANT-DATE FAIR
SHARES
VALUE
2,158,644
$
17.86
129,000
30.96
(102,644
)
17.06
0
0
2,185,000
18.67
Three-Months Ended June 30,
Six-Months Ended June 30,
Basic earnings (loss) per share
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
40,237
$
(5,927
)
$
96,533
$
2,293
47,422
46,282
47,107
46,252
$
0.85
$
(0.13
)
$
2.05
$
0.05
Table of Contents
Three-Months Ended June 30,
Six-Months Ended June 30,
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
40,237
$
(5,927
)
$
96,533
$
2,293
47,422
46,282
47,107
46,252
1,708
0
1,848
172
49,130
46,282
48,955
46,424
$
0.82
$
(0.13
)
$
1.97
$
0.05
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Six-Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
$
3,448
$
3,199
(88
)
(1,567
)
65
25
31,000
3,000
$
34,425
$
4,657
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
317,788
$
160,890
$
591,747
$
341,389
77,779
61,490
201,128
161,040
102,344
72,252
189,586
132,292
6,948
4,344
15,162
7,725
$
504,859
$
298,976
$
997,623
$
642,446
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
134,643
$
55,881
$
257,983
$
112,387
32,017
20,258
86,003
53,846
67,331
44,091
123,113
77,664
3,654
2,373
7,964
4,135
$
237,645
$
122,603
$
475,063
$
248,032
June 30, 2010
December 31, 2009
$
850,540
$
712,712
181,330
192,085
103,719
90,049
253
706
$
1,135,842
$
995,552
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
15,409
$
5,488
$
16,742
$
19,227
2,154
1,599
2,592
3,093
5,509
3,367
10,387
4,540
$
23,072
$
10,454
$
29,721
$
26,860
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
416,122
$
230,115
$
776,833
$
470,406
11,851
6,552
27,875
15,945
76,886
62,309
192,915
156,095
$
504,859
$
298,976
$
997,623
$
642,446
June 30, 2010
December 31, 2009
$
221,212
$
160,444
931
866
14,566
10,357
$
236,709
$
171,667
(1)
The Company has subsidiaries in Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Italy,
Netherlands, Brazil, and Chile that generate net sales within those respective countries and
in some cases the neighboring regions. The Company has joint ventures in China, Hong Kong,
Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand that generate net sales from those countries. The Company
also has a subsidiary in Switzerland that generates net sales from Switzerland in addition to
net sales to our distributors located in numerous non-European countries. Net sales are
attributable to geographic regions based on the location of the Company subsidiary.
(2)
Other international consists of Switzerland, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Italy,
Netherlands, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Brazil and Chile.
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
2010
2009
36.8
%
29.7
%
34.6
%
26.3
%
14.2
%
12.4
%
13.3
%
11.3
%
9.4
%
11.3
%
10.1
%
11.0
%
8.1
%
10.8
%
8.6
%
10.2
%
4.6
%
7.2
%
4.7
%
7.3
%
73.1
%
71.4
%
71.3
%
66.1
%
Table of Contents
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
international, national and local general economic, political and market conditions,
including the recent global economic slowdown and financial crisis;
entry into the highly competitive performance footwear market;
sustaining, managing and forecasting our costs and proper inventory levels;
losing any significant customers, decreased demand by industry retailers and
cancellation of order commitments due to the lack of popularity of particular designs
and/or categories of our products;
maintaining our brand image and intense competition among sellers of footwear for
consumers;
anticipating, identifying, interpreting or forecasting changes in fashion trends,
consumer demand for the products and the various market factors described above;
sales levels during the spring, back-to-school and holiday selling seasons; and
other factors referenced or incorporated by reference in our companys annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Table of Contents
Three-Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
62.9
%
53.8
%
15.4
%
20.6
%
20.3
%
24.2
%
1.4
%
1.4
%
100
%
100
%
Three-Months Ended June 30,
Six-Months Ended June 30,
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
504,859
100.0
%
$
298,976
100.0
%
$
997,623
100.0
%
$
642,446
100.0
%
267,214
52.9
176,373
59.0
522,560
52.4
394,414
61.4
237,645
47.1
122,603
41.0
475,063
47.6
248,032
38.6
875
0.1
332
0.1
1,260
0.1
604
0.1
238,520
47.2
122,935
41.1
476,323
47.7
248,636
38.7
52,437
10.4
34,813
11.6
86,746
8.7
56,323
8.8
127,299
25.2
95,848
32.1
249,786
25.0
193,886
30.1
179,736
35.6
130,661
43.7
336,532
33.7
250,209
38.9
58,784
11.6
(7,726
)
(2.6
)
139,791
14.0
(1,573
)
(0.2
)
436
0.1
581
0.2
1,864
0.2
1,290
0.2
(118
)
0
(912
)
(0.3
)
(833
)
(0.1
)
(957
)
(0.2
)
1,611
0.3
245
0.1
1,820
0.2
27
0
60,713
12.0
(7,812
)
(2.6
)
142,642
14.3
(1,213
)
(0.2
)
20,396
4.0
(1,186
)
(0.4
)
46,202
4.6
(1,939
)
(0.3
)
40,317
8.0
(6,626
)
(2.2
)
96,440
9.7
726
0.1
80
0
(699
)
(0.2
)
(93
)
0
(1,567
)
(0.2
)
$
40,237
8.0
%
$
(5,927
)
(2.0
)%
$
96,533
9.7
%
$
2,293
0.3
%
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Table of Contents
ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
Description
Agreement dated April 23, 2010 between HF Logistics-SKX T1, LLC, which is
a wholly owned subsidiary of a joint venture entered into between HF
Logistics I, LLC and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, and J.
D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. regarding 29800 Eucalyptus Avenue, Rancho Belago,
California.
General Conditions of the Contract for Construction regarding 29800
Eucalyptus Avenue, Rancho Belago, California.
Construction Loan Agreement dated as of April 30, 2010, by and among HF
Logistics-SKX T1, LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of a joint
venture entered into between HF Logistics I, LLC and a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Registrant, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent and as a lender, and Raymond James Bank FSB, as a lender.
Lease Agreement dated May 20, 2008 between Skechers EDC SPRL, a
subsidiary of the Registrant, and ProLogis Belgium III SPRL, regarding
ProLogis Park Liege Distribution Center II in Liege, Belgium.
Addendum to Lease Agreement dated May 20, 2008 between Skechers EDC SPRL,
a subsidiary of the Registrant, and ProLogis Belgium III SPRL, regarding
ProLogis Park Liege Distribution Center II in Liege, Belgium.
Amendment No. 1 to 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
+
The Company has applied with the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission for
confidential treatment of certain information pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. The Company has filed separately with its application a copy of the
exhibit including all confidential portions, which may be made available for public inspection
pending the Securities and Exchange Commissions review of the application in accordance with
Rule 24b-2.
**
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit.
***
In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, this exhibit shall not be deemed
filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
Table of Contents
Date: August 6, 2010
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
By:
/S/ DAVID WEINBERG
David Weinberg
Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 24
Page 2 of 24
Page 3 of 24
Page 4 of 24
Page 5 of 24
* | Confidential Portions Omitted and Filed Separately with the Commission. |
Page 6 of 24
Tree Removal at Sinclair
|
$[*] | Plans & Specifications |
Description | Units | Price ( $0.00) | ||||
Place 4 owner supplied base
|
Sqft | $ | [*] | |||
Place 4 contractor supplied base
|
Sqft | $ | [*] | |||
Monthly maintenance city
landscaping
|
Monthly | $ | [*] | |||
Six Foot (6) Chain Link Cal-Trans
Fencing
|
Lineal Foot | $ | [*] | |||
Polished Concrete floor W/ Exposed
aggregate
|
Sqft | $ | [*] | |||
Saw-Cut Lines Polished Concrete
Floor
|
Lineal Foot | $ | [*] | |||
Conduit roof penetrations for CATV
cameras @ building perimeter
|
$ | [*] | each | |||
Conduit & 120v power to
perimeter parking lot light poles for data
scanners
|
$ | [*] | each | |||
Palm Tree lighting & exterior architectural
lighting
|
$ | [*] | each |
* | Confidential Portions Omitted and Filed Separately with the Commission. |
Page 7 of 24
Allowance | Amount ( $0.00) | Included items | ||||
Left Turn Widening @ Theodore &
SR 60 off ramp
|
$ | [*] | Plans & Specifications | |||
12 Water line West Eucalyptus
and Ironwood Pressure Reducing Station
to POC @ NW point Redlands/SR60
ramp
|
$ | [*] | Plans & Specification | |||
Ground Sign program allowance
|
$[*] each |
* | Confidential Portions Omitted and Filed Separately with the Commission. |
Page 8 of 24
Page 9 of 24
Page 10 of 24
Page 11 of 24
Page 12 of 24
Page 13 of 24
Page 14 of 24
.1 | take that portion of the Guaranteed Maximum Price properly allocable to completed Work as determined by multiplying the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work by the share of the Guaranteed Maximum Price allocated to that portion of the Work in the schedule of values. Pending final determination of cost to the Owner of changes in the Work, amounts not in dispute shall be included as provided in Section 7.3.8 of AIA Document A201-1997; | ||
.2 | if approved in advance by the Owner, add that portion of the Guaranteed Maximum Price properly allocable to materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the Work, or suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing; | ||
.3 | add the Contractors Fee less retainage of ten percent (10%) . The Contractors Fee shall be computed upon the Cost of the Work described in the two preceding Clauses at the rate stated in Section 5.1.2 or, if the Contractors Fee is stated as a fixed sum in that Subsection, shall be an amount that bears the same ratio to that fixed-sum fee as the Cost of the Work in the two preceding Clauses bears to a reasonable estimate of the probable Cost of the Work upon its completion. Subject to the approval of Owners construction lender, when the Work is determined to be 50% complete, retainage shall be reduced to 5%. Any scope of Work that has been paid in full without retainage withheld shall not be included for purposes of determining whether the Work is 50% complete. | ||
.4 | subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner; | ||
.5 | subtract the shortfall, if any, indicated by the Contractor in the documentation required by Section 12.1.4 to substantiate prior Applications for Payment, or resulting from errors subsequently discovered by the Owners accountants in such documentation; and | ||
.6 | subtract amounts, if any, for which the Owner has withheld or nullified a Certificate for Payment as provided in Section 9.5 of AIA Document A201-1997. |
Page 15 of 24
Page 16 of 24
Page 17 of 24
Kim Abreu
|
Bertie Chawla, P.E | |
SVP - Commercial Real Estate
|
1626 E.4th Street | |
BANK OF AMERICA
|
Santa Ana, CA 92701 | |
1 Alhambra Plaza, Penthouse
|
Telephone: (714) 571-0287 | |
Coral Gables, FL 33134
|
Facsimile: (714) 571-0033 | |
Facsimile: (312) 453-3838
|
Page 18 of 24
Page 19 of 24
Page 20 of 24
Document | Title | Pages | ||
|
Page 21 of 24
Page 22 of 24
This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above and is executed in at least three original copies, of which one is to be delivered to the Contractor, one to the Architect for use in the administration of the Contract, and the remainder to the Owner. |
Page 23 of 24
HF LOGISTICS-SKX T1, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company |
J.D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. | |||||||
|
||||||||
By: HF Logistics-SKX, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, its sole member |
||||||||
|
||||||||
By: HF Logistics I, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, its managing member |
||||||||
|
||||||||
By:
|
/s/ Iddo Benzeevi
|
|||||||
|
Iddo Benzeevi, President and | By: | /s/ Joel Alexander | |||||
|
||||||||
|
Chief Executive Officer | Joel Alexander, Vice President / CFO | ||||||
|
||||||||
Date:
|
4/23/2010 | Date: | 4/23/2010 |
Page 24 of 24
Page 1 of 5
Page 2 of 5
Page 3 of 5
Page 4 of 5
Page 5 of 5
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 12nd Quarter l 3rd Quartex ,, 14th Quarter 1 st Quartex ,, l2nd Qu art Mar | Apr | May T Jun Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov | Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar 1 Apr 1 CLIENTS KEY OBJECTIVE MILESTONES 4/19 i i i 3/21 2 Start Grading Operations 4 4/19 3 Certify Center 1/3rd Building Pad * 5/21 4 Start Mezzanine / Racking Vendor + 9/21 5 Shell Completion + 3/21 6 OVERALL CONSTRUCTION 4/5 « 3/18 7 PRE CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION and MOBILIZATION 4/5 '' mam m m f 7/14 8 Contract Award and Negotiations 4/5 ? 4/9 9 Contract Fully Executed 4 4/9 10 Evidence of Financing in Place + 4/9 11 Subcontract Negotiations and Release to Secure Materials 4/12 | j 4/23 12 Release Subs to Secure Materials 4 4/23 13 MATERIAL ACQUISITION 4/19 > 7/14 14"~ Finalize Material Orders 4/28 fj 5/4 15 Reinforcing Steel 5/5 J 6/21 16 Foundations 5/5 II 5/25 17 Panels 5/5 | n 6/21 ~~T8~"~ Structural Steel 4/19 7/1 19 Anchor Bolts and Templates 5/5 | | 5/25 20 Mill Order Beams and Columns in Local Warehouse ? 4/19 21 Shop Fabrication 5/6 I ¦ 1 7/1 22 Panelized Roof 5/5 7/14 23 Joists and Girders 5/5 I | I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 7/14 24 Plywood and Dimensional Lumber 5/5 n | I I || I I M I I M I l( 7/14 25 Permit Acquisition 4/5 w 4/9 26 Grading and Utility Permits Acquired ? 4/5 27 Building and All Remaining Permits Acquired :? 4/5 28 Construction Issue Drawings Acquired ? 4/9 29 Mobilization 4/9 < 4/19 30 Notice to Proceed ? 4/9 31 Mobilization (Based on Critical Path Material Acquisitions) 4/12 gj 4/16 32 All Diffenbaugh Requirements for Project Start In Place ? 4/9 33 Contract Commencement Milestone ? 4/19 34 VENDOR REQUIRED WORK ? 5/24 35 Conveyor Mezzanine Footings Installation ? 5/24 36 ROUGH GRADING (Site Package Element) 4/12 7/26 37~ Schedule and Conduct Pre Grade Meeting 4/12 g 4/14 3(3 Mobilize Equipment 4/14 ? 4/19 39 Coordinate Water Sources 4/14 0 4/16 40 Building Pad 4/19 ¦¦ ¦ 7/21 ~4~i Develop Building Pad Area 33 thru 17 4/19 | | 5/19 42 Develop Building Pad Area 49 thru 33 5/19 lir:/ ; ; i| 6/22 |
Page 1
j J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 12nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter IslQyarter |j>nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun T Jul 1 Aug 1 Sep I Oct | Nov \ Dec 1 Jan | Feb I Mar \ Apr T~~ 43 Develop Building Pad Area 17 thru 1 6/22 | | 7/21 44 Progressive Pad Certifications 5/19 7/26 45 Pad Certification Area 33 thru 17 5/19 g 5/24 46 Pad Certification Area 49 thru 33 6/22 g 6/25 47 Pad Certification Area 17 thru 1 7/21 ? 7/26 48 WEATHER DELAY ALLOCATIONS 4/26 11/29 ~~49 Allocation 1st Qtr Schedule 2 Days + 4/26 50 Allocation 2nd Qtr Schedule 3 Days + 6/1 51 Allocations 3rd Qtr Schedule 2 Days * 8/31 ~52 Allocation 4th Qtr Schedule 3 Days ? 11/29 ~~53~~ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 5/24 3/18 ~54~~ BELOW GRADE UTILITIES 5/24 mhb 8/12 55 Plumbing and Other Area 33 thru 17 5/24* 6/14 56~ Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 5/24 FFR 6/4 57 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 5/28 033 6/8 58 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 6/7 fl 6/10 59 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 6/9 g 6/14 60~~ Plumbing and Other Area 49 thru 33 6/25* 7/15 61 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 6/25 ? 7/7 ~~62~~ Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 7/6 | 7/9 63 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 7/8 Q 7/13 64 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 7/12 | 7/15 65 Plumbing and Other Area 17 thru 1 7/26 * 8/12 66 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 7/26 Q 7/29 67 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 7/28 fj 8/2 68 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 7/30 Q 8/4 69 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 8/3 ? 8/12 ~70 BUILDING CONCRETE 5/24 * 10/5 71 Building Concrete Area 33 thru 17 5/24 7/26 72 Interior Foundations 5/24 * 6/11 73 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 5/24 ** 5/28 74 Verify Line and Grade 5/24 | 5/25 75 Layout and Excavation 5/24 g 5/26 76 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 5/25 77 Install Rebar 5/25 ] 5/26 78 Install Bolts and Embeds 5/26 | 5/26 79 Place Foundations 5/27 | 5/27 8() Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 5/28 J 5/28 ~~81 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 5/27 6/7 82 Layout and Excavation 5/27 0 5/28 83 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 5/27 84 Install Rebar 5/28 j 5/28 |
Page 2
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quart Mar I Apr I May [ Jun I Jul I Aug TSep I Oct I Nov | Dec 1 Jan I Feb | Mar | Apr I 85 install Bob and Embeds 5728 ] 5/28 ~86 Place Foundations 6/4 [ 6/4 87 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 6/7 j 6/7 ~jT8~ Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 6/4 WW 6/9 89 Layout and Excavation 6/4 fj 6/7 90 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 6/4 ~9~i Install Rebar 6/7 | 6/7 92 Install Bolts and Embeds 6/7 | 6/7 93 Place Foundations 6/8 | 6/8 94 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 6/9 | 6/9 95 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 6/8 W 6/11 96 Layout and Excavation 6/8 q 6/9 97 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 6/8 98 Install Rebar 6/9 | 6/9 99 Install Bolts and Embeds 6/9 | 6/9 100~~ Place Foundations 6/10 | 6/10 ~loi Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 6/11 | 6/11 102 Interior and Perimeter / Panel Foundations 6/10 7/13 103 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 6/10 6/30 T04~ Layout and Excavate 6/10 rj 6/15 105 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 6/10 106 Install Rebar 6/11 gg 6/16 TOT Install Bolts and Embeds 6/16 fl 6/17 108 ~ Place Foundations 6/18 g 6/22 ~To~9~ Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 6/21 g 6/22 110 Install Erection Pads 6/21 | 6/23 111 Cure Time Prior to Loading 6/24 rjg 6/30 112 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 6/16 7/6 113 Layout and Excavate 6/16 g 6/17 114 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 6/16 115 Install Rebar 6/17 ] 6/18 116 Install Bolts and Embeds 6/18 I 6/18 117 Place Foundations 6/23 g 6/24 118 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 6/25 | 6/25 ~W~ Install Erection Pads 6/25 | 6/28 120 Cure Time Prior to Loading 6/29 rg 7/6 121 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 6/18 7/8 122 Layout and Excavate 6/18 g 6/21 123 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 6/18 124 Install Rebar 6/21 g 6/22 125 Install Bolts and Embeds 6/22 | 6/22 126 Place Foundations 6/25 ffl 6/28 |
Page 3
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4thQuarte 1st Quarter 2nd Quart Mar I Apr | May |~ Jun Jul | Aug~ 1 Sep \ Oct I Nov I Dec 1 Jan I Feb T Mar | Apr 127 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 6/29 [ 6/29 128~ Install Erection Pads 6/29 | 6/30 ~129 ~ Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/1 gg 7/8 130 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 6/22 7/13 131 Layout and Excavate 6/22 g 6/25 132 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 6/22 133 Install Rebar 6/23 R3 6/28 134 Install Bolts and Embeds 6/28 0 6/29 13ET Place Foundations 6/30 [ 7/2 136 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/1 g 7/2 137 install Erection Pads 7/1 Q 7/6 138 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/7 g 7/13 139 Slab on Grade 6/7 7/13 140 Confirm Backfills Approved ? 6/7 141 Panel Casting Slab Area #1 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/8 6/18 142~~ Fine Grade and Prep 6/8 Q 6/9 143 Install Edge Form 6/9 | 6/9 144 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 6/9 0 6/10 145 Place and Finish Slab 6/10 fj 6/11 146 Wet Cure 6/14 a 6/18 147~ Panel Casting Slab Area #2 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/10 6/22 148~~ Fine Grade and Prep 6/10 | 6/11 149 Install Edge Form 6/11 | 6/11 150 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 6/11 Q 6/14 151 Place and Finish Slab 6/14 | 6/15 152 Wet Cure 6/16 0 6/22 T53~~ Panel Casting Slab Area #3 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/14 6/24 ~~154 Fine Grade and Prep 6/14 0 6/15 155 Install Edge Form 6/15 [ 6/15 156 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 6/15 rj 6/16 157 Place and Finish Slab 6/16 0 6/17 158 Wet Cure 6/18 Q] 6/24 T59 Panel Casting Slab Area #4 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/16 6/28 ~1&T~ Fine Grade and Prep 6/16 | 6/17 161 Install Edge Form 6/17 | 6/17 T61T Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 6/17 0 6/18 163 Place and Finish Slab 6/18 | 6/21 164 Wet Cure 6/22 g 6/28 165 Panel Casting Slab Area #5 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/18 * 6/30 ~T66~~ Fine Grade and Prep 6/18 ? 6/21 167 Install Edge Form 6/21 | 6/21 168"~ Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 6/21 p 6/22 |
Page 4
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4 h Qua rteL 1st Qyarter 2nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun \ Jul 1 Aug | Sep 1 Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar [Apr I 169 Place and Finish Sab 6/22 0 6/23 170 Wet Cure 6/24 ? 6/30 171 Panel Casting Slab Area #6 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/22 W 7/2 ~72 Fine Grade and Prep 6/22 J 6/23 173 Install Edge Form 6/23 ] 6/23 174 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 6/23 Q 6/24 175 Place and Finish Slab 6/24 B 6/25 176 Wet Cure 6/28 rj 7/2 ~T77~ Interior Slab Area #7 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/24 7/7 178 Fine Grade and Prep 6/24 g 6/25 ~T79~~ Install Edge Form 6/25 | 6/25 ~T80~ Place and Finish Slab 6/28 fl 6/29 181 Wet Cure 6/30 pj 7/7 182 Interior Slab Area #8 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/28 7/9 183 Fine Grade and Prep 6/28 0 6/29 184 Install Edge Form 6/29 [ 6/29 185 Place and Finish Slab 6/30 [] 7/1 186 Wet Cure 7/2 m 7/9 187 Interior Slab Area #9 (+/ 65,000 sf) 6/30 7/13 ~188 Fine Grade and Prep 6/30 I 7/1 189 Install Edge Form 7/1 | 7/1 ~T9(T~ Place and Finish Slab 7/2 g 7/6 ~l9T~ Wet Cure 7/7 E 7/13 192 Panels 6/21 7/26 193 Panels and Reinforcing Steel 6/21 Mm ji 7/19 194 Panels #74 thru #50 (Group #1 25 Panels 6/21 7/8 195 Layout and Snap Lines 6/21 I 6/21 196 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 6/21 j 6/23 197 ~ Install Down Side Embeds 6/21 | 6/23 T98 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 6/22 g 6/24 199 Install Lift Steel 6/23 Q 6/24 ~200 Install Upside Panel Embeds 6/22 § 6/25 201 Install Other Embedded Systems 6/22 | 6/25 202 Ring Panel / Panel Check 6/25 | 6/28 203 Place and Finish Panel 6/29 0 6/30 204 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/1 ? 7/8 205 Strip Formwork and Clean 7/7 | 7/8 206 Install Panel Braces 7/6 g 7/8 207 Panels #49 #39 and #296 #309 (Group 6/23 7/12 208 Layout and Snap Lines 6/23 1 6/23 ~209~~ Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 6/23 g 6/25 210 Install Down Side Embeds 6/23 g 6/25 |
Page 5
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter J 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter 1 st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar Apr | May | Jun I jTjl | Aug T Sep | Oct I Nov I Dec~] Jan f Feb I Mar I Apr | 211 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 6/24 6/28 212 Install Lift Steel 6/25 Q 6/28 ~2~T~ Install Upside Panel Embeds 6/24 ? 6/29 214 Install Other Embedded Systems 6/24 fg 6/29 215 Ring Panel / Panel Check 6/29 | 6/30 216 Place and Finish Panel 7/1 0 7/2 217 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/6 EB 7/12 218 Strip Formwork and Clean 7/9 p 7/12 219 Install Panel Braces 7/8 [Fj 7/12 ~22CT Panels #286 #295 and #320 #334 (Grou| 6/29 * * 7/15 221 Layout and Snap Lines 6/29 | 6/29 222 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 6/29 g 7/1 223 Install Down Side Embeds 6/29 g 7/1 224 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 6/29 fj 7/1 ~225~~ Install Lift Steel 6/30 Q 7/1 226 Install Upside Panel Embeds 6/29 Q 7/2 227 Install Other Embedded Systems 6/29 Q 7/2 ~228~ Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/2 ? 7/6 ~~22~9 Place and Finish Panel 7/7 0 7/8 230 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/9 ? 7/15 231 Strip Formwork and Clean 7/14 fj 7/15 232 Install Panel Braces 7/13 | 7/15 233 Panels #198 #212 and #310 #319 (Grou| 7/1 m 7/16 ~~234~ Layout and Snap Lines 7/1 | 7/1 235 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/1 ? 7/6 236 Install Down Side Embeds 7/1 ? 7/6 237 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7/1 ? 7/6 238 Install Lift Steel 7/2 g 7/6 239 Install Upside Panel Embeds 7/1 [Jj 7/7 240 Install Other Embedded Systems 7/1 ? 7/7 241 Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/6 o 7/7 242 Place and Finish Panel 7/8 o 7/9 ~243 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/12 Q 7/16 244 Strip Formwork and Clean 7/15 fj 7/16 ~245~~ Install Panel Braces 7/14 fj 7/16 246 Panels #176 #197 and #280 #285 (Grot 7/1 » 7/19 247 Layout and Snap Lines 7/1 | 7/1 248~ Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/6 fj 7/8 249 Install Down Side Embeds 7/6 g 7/8 250 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7/6 g 7/8 251 Install Lift Steel 7/7 [] 7/8 252 Install Upside Panel Embeds 7/6 g 7/8 |
Page 6
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter l 3rd Qyarter 14th Quarter 11 st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr | May T Jun \ Jul | Aug I Sep | Oct [ Nov I Dec I Jan | Feb I Iviar I Apr | 253 Install Other Embedded Systems 7/6 0 7/8 254 Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/8 | 7/9 255 Place and Finish Panel 7/9 | 7/12 256 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/13 ? 7/19 257 Strip Form work and Clean 7/16 g] 7/19 258 Install Panel Braces 7/15 fj 7/19 259 Panel Erection 7/7 f ) 7/26 260 Column Line 17 thru 33 7/7 7/26 261 Crane Delivery and Assembly 7/9 Fj 7/12 262 Crane Access / Travel Prepared 7/7 g 7/8 263 Panel Erection 7/14 «p? 7/20 ~~264~~ Panel Group #1 7/14 | 7/14 ~265~~ Panel Group #2 7/15 | 7/15 ~~266~ Panel Group #3 7/16 Q 7/16 267 Panel Group #4 7/19 | 7/19 268 Panel Group #5 7/20 [ 7/20 269 Plumb, Line and Weld 7/14 ? 7/22 270 Grout Panel Bottoms 7/19 LB 7/26 271 Building Concrete Area 49 thru 33 6/28 8/26 272 Interior Foundations 6/28 JPV 7/12 273 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 6/28 W 7/1 274 Verify Line and Grade 6/28 | 6/28 275 Layout and Excavation 6/28 | 6/29 276 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 6/28 277 Install Rebar 6/29 16/29 278 Install Bolts and Embeds 6/29 J 6/29 279 Place Foundations 6/30 | 6/30 280 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/1 | 7/1 281 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 6/30 W 7/6 282 Layout and Excavation 6/30 I 7/1 283 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 6/30 284 Install Rebar 7/1 [ 7/1 285 Install Bolts and Embeds 7/1 | 7/1 286 Place Foundations 7/2 | 7/2 287 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/6 I 7/6 288 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 7/2 W 7/8 289 Layout and Excavation 7/2 a 7/6 290 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 7/2 ~~29~1 Install Rebar 7/6 | 7/6 292 Install Bolts and Embeds 7/6 | 7/6 ¦ 293 Place Foundations 7/7 | 7/7 294 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/8 j 7/8 |
Page 7
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quart MarJJ Apr [ May I Jun I Jul [ Aug I Sep I Oct I ~Nov | Dec | Jan T Feb I Mar | Apr 1 295 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 7/7 W 7/12 296 Layout and Excavation 7/7 g 7/8 297 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 7/7 298 Install Rebar 7/8 j 7/8 299 Install Bolts and Embeds 7/8 [ 7/8 30T~~ Place Foundations 7/9 | 7/9 301 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/12 [ 7/12 302 Interior and Perimeter/Panel Foundations 7/9 » 8/9 303 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 7/9 7/29 304~ Layout and Excavate 7/9 g 7/14 305 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 7/9 306 Install Rebar 7/12 g 7/15 307 Install Bolts and Embeds 7/15 g 7/16 308 Place Foundations 7/19 g 7/21 309~~ Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/20 g 7/21 ~3lo"~ Install Erection Pads 7/20 g 7/22 311 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/23 gg 7/29 3~12 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 7/15 > 8/3 313 Layout and Excavate 7/15 g 7/16 314 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 7/15 3l5~ Install Rebar 7/16 ffl 7/19 ~3~ilT Install Bolts and Embeds 7/19 I 7/19 317 Place Foundations 7/22 g 7/23 318 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/26 | 7/26 ~3V3~ Install Erection Pads 7/26 g 7/27 320 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/28 EB 8/3 32l""~ Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 7/19 < 8/5 322 Layout and Excavate 7/19 0 7/20 323 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 7/19 324 Install Rebar 7/20 fl 7/21 ~32lT Install Bolts and Embeds 7/21 | 7/21 326 Place Foundations 7/26 g 7/27 327 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/28 | 7/28 328 Install Erection Pads 7/28 g 7/29 329 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/30 (FJ 8/5 330 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 7/21 8/9 ~3~3~1 Layout and Excavate 7/21 g 7/22 332 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 7/21 333 Install Rebar 7/22 J 7/23 334 Install Bolts and Embeds 7/23 I 7/23 335 Place Foundations 7/28 g 7/29 336~~ Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/29 ] 7/29 |
Page 8
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID Task Name 12nd Quarter 13rd Quarter 14th Quarter 11st Quarter 12nd Quart MaT | Apr 1 May I Jun I Jul T Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov | Dec | Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I 337 Install Erection Pads 7/30 E 8/2 338 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/3 0 8/9 339 Slab on Grade 7/1 8/11 340 Confirm Backfills Approved + 7/1 341 Panel Casting Slab Area #1 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/7 « 7/20 342 Fine Grade and Prep 7/7 rj 7/9 343 Install Edge Form 7/8 | 7/9 344 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 7/8 Q 7/12 345 Place and Finish Slab 7/9 g 7/13 346 Wet Cure 7/13 ? 7/20 347 Panel Casting Slab Area #2 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/9 7/22 348 Fine Grade and Prep 7/9 g 7/13 349 Install Edge Form 7/12 | 7/13 350 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 7/12 Q 7/14 ~~35T~ Place and Finish Slab 7/13 Q 7/15 352 Wet Cure 7/15 ? 7/22 353 Panel Casting Slab Area #3 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/13 <p 7/26 354""' Fine Grade and Prep 7/13 0 7/15 355""' Install Edge Form 7/14 | 7/15 356 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 7/14 g 7/16 357 Place and Finish Slab 7/15 | 7/19 358 Wet Cure 7/19 EH 726 ~~359 Panel Casting Slab Area #4 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/15 7/28 360 Fine Grade and Prep 7/15 FJ 7/19 361 Install Edge Form 7/16 fl 7/19 362 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 7/16 [TJ 7/20 363 Place and Finish Slab 7/19 g 7/21 364~ Wet Cure 7/21 H 7/28 365 Panel Casting Slab Area #5 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/19 7/30 366 Fine Grade and Prep 7/19 Q 7/21 367 Install Edge Form 7/20 | 7/21 368 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 7/20 g 7/22 369 Place and Finish Slab 7/21 | 7/23 370 Wet Cure 7/23 Efl 7/30 ~377~ Interior Slab Area #6 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/21 8/3 372~ Fine Grade and Prep 7/21 1 7/23 373 Install Edge Form 7/22 | 7/23 ~374 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 7/22 g 7/26 375 Place and Finish Slab 7/23 rj 7/27 376 Wet Cure 7/27 F£| 8/3 ¦ 377~ Interior Slab Area #7 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/23 8/5 378 Fine Grade and Prep 7/23 a 7/27 |
Page 9
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 12nd Quarter 13rd Quarter 14th Quarter 1st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr 1 May~~T Jun Jul I Auq I Sep 1 Oct I Nov I Dec 1 Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr 379 Install Edge Form 7/26 | 7/27 380 Place and Finish Slab 7/27 Q 7/29 381 Wet Cure 7/29 g 8/5 382 Interior Slab Area #8 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/27 * 8/9 383 Fine Grade and Prep 7/27 g 7/29 384 Install Edge Form 7/28 I 7/29 385 Place and Finish Slab 7/29 g 8/2 386 Wet Cure 8/2 0 8/9 ~387~ Interior Slab Area #9 (+/ 65,000 sf) 7/29 8/11 ~388~~ Fine Grade and Prep 7/29 B 8/2 389 Install Edge Form 7/30 fj 8/2 390 Place and Finish Slab 8/2 g 8/4 391 Wet Cure 8/4 rj 8/11 392 Panels 7/20 8/26 393 ~ Panels and Reinforcing Steel 7/20 8/16 ~394~~ Panels #73 #114 and #128 #130 (Group 7/20 1 8/5 ~395~~ Layout and Snap Lines 7/20 | 7/21 396 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/20 0 7/23 397 Install Down Side Embeds 7/20 g 7/23 398 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7/20 Q 7/23 ~~399~~ Install Lift Steel 7/21 g 7/23 400 Install Upside Panel Embeds 7/20 ? 7/26 401 Install Other Embedded Systems 7/20 ? 7/26 402 Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/23 Q 7/27 ~Td3~ Place and Finish Panel 7/27 g 7/29 ~404~ Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/29 ? 8/5 405 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/3 g 8/5 ~~4~0~6~~ Install Panel Braces 8/2 | 8/5 407 Panels #115 #127 and #146 #157 (Grou 7/22 8/9 408 Layout and Snap Lines 7/22 5 7/23 409 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/22 g 7/27 410 Install Down Side Embeds 7/22 q 7/27 4T1 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7/22 a 7/27 412 Install Lift Steel 7/23 g 7/27 ~~413~~ Install Upside Panel Embeds 7/22 FJ 7/28 414 Install Other Embedded Systems 7/22 g 7/28 415 Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/27 fl 7/29 416 Place and Finish Panel 7/29 | 8/2 417~ Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/2 rfl 8/9 418 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/5 fl 8/9 4T9 Install Panel Braces 8/4 g 8/9 420 Panels #83 #92 and #131 #145 (Group * 7/28 8/13 |
Page 10
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 12nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter [1st Quarter |2nd QyM Mar I Apr I May ~] Jun I Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct [ Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar | Apr f~ 421 Layout andSnap Lines 7/28 j 7/29 422~~ Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/28 g 8/2 423 Install Down Side Embeds 7/28 g 8/2 424 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7/28 g 8/2 425 Install Lift Steel 7/29 g 8/2 426 Install Upside Panel Embeds 7/28 e 8/3 427 Install Other Embedded Systems 7/28 [g 8/3 428 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/2 | 8/4 429 Place and Finish Panel 8/4 | 8/6 430 Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/6 gg 8/13 431 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/11 | 8/13 432 Install Panel Braces 8/10 g 8/13 433 Panels #75 #82 and #158 #175 (Group t 7/30 * 8/16 434 Layout and Snap Lines 7/30 g 8/2 435 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/30 p 8/4 436 Install Down Side Embeds 7/30 Fj 8/4 437 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7/30 g 8/4 438 Install Lift Steel 8/2 g 8/4 439 Install Upside Panel Embeds 7/30 g 8/5 440 Install Other Embedded Systems 7/30 Q 8/5 441 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/3 g 8/5 442 Place and Finish Panel 8/5 g 8/9 ~ 443 ~ Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/9 ffl 8/16 444 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/12 g 8/16 445 Install Panel Braces 8/11 E 8/16 446 Panel Erection 8/2 8/26 ~447 Column Line 33 thru 49 8/2 8/26 448 Crane Delivery and Assembly 8/4 | 8/6 ~449~~ Crane Access /Travel Prepared 8/2 fl 8/4 450 Panel Erection 8/13 8/19 451 Panel Group #1 8/13 rj 8/16 452 Panel Group #2 8/16 18/17 453 ~ Panel Group #3 8/17)8/18 454 Panel Group #4 8/18 | 8/19 455 Plumb, Line and Weld 8/13 ? 8/24 456 Grout Panel Bottoms 8/18 gg 8/26 457 Building Concrete Area 17 thru 1 7/26 my 10/5 ~~45lT~ Interior Foundations 7/26 8/9 459 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 7/26 «* 7/30 ~460 Verify Line and Grade 7/26 | 7/27 461 Layout and Excavation 7/26 g 7/28 462 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 7/26 |
Page 11
j J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter J 3rd Q uarter 14th Quarter 11st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr | May I Jun I Jul [ Auq I Sep I Oct I Nov | Dec~T Jan I Feb~T Mar I AprT~ 463 Install Rebar 7/27 [ 7/28 ~~464~ Install Bolts and Embeds 7/27 [ 7/28 465 Place Foundations 7/28 J 7/29 466 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/29 | 7/30 467~~ Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 7/28 8/3 468 Layout and Excavation 7/28 Q 7/30 469 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 7/28 470 Install Rebar 7/29 | 7/30 471 Install Bolts and Embeds 7/29 | 7/30 472 Place Foundations 7/30 rj 8/2 473 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/2 j 8/3 474 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 7/30 ** 8/5 475 Layout and Excavation 7/30 ? 8/3 476 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 7/30 ~477~ Install Rebar 8/2 | 8/3 478 Install Bolts and Embeds 8/2 j 8/3 479 Place Foundations 8/3 | 8/4 480 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/4 | 8/5 481 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 8/3 WW 8/9 482 Layout and Excavation 8/3 fj 8/5 483 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A ? 8/3 ~484~~ Install Rebar 8/4 I 8/5 ~485~ Install Bolts and Embeds 8/4 | 8/5 486 Place Foundations 8/5 | 8/6 487 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/6 a 8/9 488 Interior and Perimeter / Panel Foundations 8/4 9/8 489 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 8/4 8/16 490 Layout and Excavate 8/5 g 8/9 491 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 8/5 ~T92~ Install Rebar 8/4 g 8/6 493 Install Bolts and Embeds 8/5 | 8/6 494 Place Foundations 8/6 [I] 8/10 495 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/6 g 8/9 ~496~~ Install Erection Pads 8/5 g 8/9 497 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/9 FTj 8/16 ~498~ Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 8/9 8/25 499 Layout and Excavate 8/9 Q 8/11 500 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A + 8/9 501 Install Rebar 8/10 | 8/12 502 Install Bolts and Embeds 8/11 J 8/12 503 Place Foundations 8/12 Q 8/16 504 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/16 | 8/17 |
Page 12
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name I 12nd Quarter 13rd Quarter 14th Quarter 11 st Quarter |2ndQjjart Mar I Apr I May I Jun Jul I ~Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov [ Dec \ Jan I Feb 1 Mar I Apr 505 install Erection Pads 8/16 1 8/18 506 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/18 g 8/25 507 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 8/11 8/27 508 Layout and Excavate 8/11 g 8/13 509 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A 8/11 510 Install Rebar 8/12 Q 8/16 511 Install Bolts and Embeds 8/13 g 8/16 ~512"~ Place Foundations 8/16 [ 8/18 5?3 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/18 | 8/19 514 Install Erection Pads 8/18 g 8/20 515 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/20 Q 8/27 516 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 8/13 9/8 517 Layout and Excavate 8/13 rj 8/19 518 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A 4 8/13 5T9~~ Install Rebar 8/16 g 8/20 526~~ Install Bolts and Embeds 8/19 | 8/23 521 Place Foundations 8/23 g 8/26 522 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/24 [] 8/26 523 Install Erection Pads 8/24 | 8/27 524 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/27 cp 9/8 525 Slab on Grade 7/30 9/13 526 Confirm Backfills Approved ? 7/30 527 Panel Casting Slab Area #1 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/3 8/16 528 Fine Grade and Prep 8/3 g 8/5 529 Install Edge Form 8/4 | 8/5 ~~530~ Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 8/4 g 8/6 53? Place and Finish Slab 8/5 Q 8/9 532 Wet Cure 8/9 03 8/16 533 Panel Casting Slab Area #2 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/5 8/18 534 Fine Grade and Prep 8/5 fj 8/9 535 Install Edge Form 8/6 g 8/9 536 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 8/6 rj 8/10 537 Place and Finish Slab 8/9 | 8/11 538 Wet Cure 8/11 Q 8/18 539 Panel Casting Slab Area #3 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/9 «¦*) 8/20 5~4~0 Fine Grade and Prep 8/9 g 8/11 541 Install Edge Form 8/10 | 8/11 542 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 8/10 g 8/12 543 Place and Finish Slab 8/11 3 8/13 544 Wet Cure 8/13 H3 8/20 545 Panel Casting Slab Area #4 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/12 8/25 546"' Fine Grade and Prep 8/12 g 8/16 |
Page 13
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name I 12nd Quarter 13rd Quarter 4t h Quarter lj st Q uarter JldjOuart Mar I Apr I May I Jun | Jul I Aug [ !>ep I Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr T 547 Install Edge Form 8/13 0 8/16 548 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 8/13 Q 8/17 549 Place and Finish Slab 8/16 | 8/18 550 Wet Cure 8/18 gg 8/25 551 Panel Casting Slab Area #5 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/16 9 8/27 552 Fine Grade and Prep 8/16 0 8/18 553 Install Edge Form 8/17 | 8/18 554 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 8/17 Q 8/19 555 Place and Finish Slab 8/18 Q 8/20 556 Wet Cure 8/20 ? 8/27 ~557"~ Interior Slab Area #6 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/18 * 9/2 558 Fine Grade and Prep 8/18 g 8/20 559 Install Edge Form 8/19 1 8/20 560 Place Reinforcing Steel / Dowels 8/19 fj 8/23 561 Place and Finish Slab 8/20 g 8/24 562 Wet Cure 8/24 JFJj 9/2 563 Interior Slab Area #7 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/20 4 9/7 564""' Fine Grade and Prep 8/20 Q 8/24 565 Install Edge Form 8/23 J 8/24 566 Place and Finish Slab 8/24 ] 8/26 ~567~ Wet Cure 8/26 FJ H 9/7 568 Interior Slab Area #8 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/24 9/9 569 Fine Grade and Prep 8/24 g 8/26 570 Install Edge Form 8/25 | 8/26 571 Place and Finish Slab 8/26 Q 8/30 572 Wet Cure 8/30 r EB 9/9 573 Interior Slab Area #9 (+/ 65,000 sf) 8/26 9/13 574 Fine Grade and Prep 8/26 FJ 8/30 575 Install Edge Form 8/27 g 8/30 576 Place and Finish Slab 8/30 g 9/3 577 Wet Cure 9/3 B 9/13 578 Panels 8/16 10/5 579 Panels and Reinforcing Steel 8/16 9/24 580 Panels #14 #38 (Group #1 25 Panels) 8/16 9/3 581 Layout and Snap Lines 8/16 | 8/17 582 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 8/16 | 8/19 583""' Install Down Side Embeds 8/16 B 8/19 584 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 8/16 fj 8/19 585 Install Lift Steel 8/17 | 8/19 586 Install Upside Panel Embeds 8/16 Q 8/20 587 Install Other Embedded Systems 8/16 Q 8/20 588 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/19 ffl 8/23 |
Page 14
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter l 4th Qua rter 1st Quartex 1 2nd Quart Mar~1 Apr | May I Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 589 Place and Finish Panel 8/23 D 8/25 ~590 Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/25 EFJ 9/3 591 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/30 g 9/3 592 Install Panel Braces 8/27 03 9/3 593 Panels #1 #13 and #268 #279 (Group # 8/18 9/8 594 Layout and Snap Lines 8/18 | 8/19 595 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 8/18 g 8/23 596 Install Down Side Embeds 8/18 rj 8/23 597 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 8/18 g 8/23 ~598~ Install Lift Steel 8/19 ffl 8/23 599 Install Upside Panel Embeds 8/18 ffl 8/24 600 Install Other Embedded Systems 8/18 g] 8/24 60~1 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/23 Q 8/25 602 Place and Finish Panel 8/25 | 8/27 603 Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/27 r£g 9/8 604 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/3 FJ 9/8 605 Install Panel Braces 9/2 g 9/8 606 Panels #243 #267 (Group #3 25 Panels) 8/25 9/15 607 Layout and Snap Lines 8/25 | 8/26 608 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 8/25 Q 8/30 609""' Install Down Side Embeds 8/25 Fj 8/30 ~6To~~~ Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 8/25 g 8/30 611 Install Lift Steel 8/26 g 8/30 612 Install Upside Panel Embeds 8/25 gg 9/2 613 Install Other Embedded Systems 8/25 CD 9/2 614 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/30 0 9/3 615 Place and Finish Panel 9/3 g 9/8 616 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/8 ffl 9/15 ~617 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/13 g 9/15 ~~6T8 Install Panel Braces 9/10 E 9/15 619 Panels #213 #342 (Group #4 32 Panels) 8/27 9/24 620 Layout and Snap Lines 8/27 rj 8/30 621 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 8/27 Q 9/8 622 Install Down Side Embeds 9/2 ? 9/10 623""' Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 9/7 ? 9/14 ~6~24~ Install Lift Steel 9/10 Q 9/14 625 Install Upside Panel Embeds 9/9 g 9/15 626"' Install Other Embedded Systems 9/9 ? 9/15 627 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/13 | 9/15 628 Place and Finish Panel 9/15 | 9/17 629 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/17 @ 9/24 630 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/22 o 9/24 |
Page 15
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter ~ 13rd Quarter 14th Quarter 11 st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul T~~Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan | Feb I Mar I Apr I 631 Install Panel Braces 9/21 rj 9/24 632 Panel Erection 9/10 p 10/5 633 Column Line 1 thru 17 9/10 p 10/5 634 Crane Delivery and Assembly 9/14 g 9/16 635 Crane Access / Travel Prepared 9/10 m 9/14 636 Panel Erection 9/17 (f 9/28 637 Panel Group #1 9/17 g 9/20 638 Panel Group #2 9/20 | 9/21 ~~639~ Panel Group #3 9/21 I 9/22 ~64b"~ Panel Group #4 9/24 | 9/28 641 Plumb, Line and Weld 9/22 ? 10/1 ~~642~ Grout Panel Bottoms 9/27 gg 10/5 643 STRUCTURAL STEEL 6/28 10/11 ~~644~ Structural Steel Area 33 thru 17 6/28 7/30 645 Level Base Plate Setting Nuts 6/28 rj 6/29 646 Slab on Grade In Place for Delivery * 6/30 647 Deliver, Shake Out and Spread Steel 7/2 rj 7/6 648 Panel Erection Complete ? 7/22 649~ Brace Frame Column Line 25 7/2 7/9 650 Erect Wide Flange Columns, Beams and Chevrc 7/2 [JJ 7/8 651 Plumb, Line, Weld and Temporary Brace 7/9 | 7/9 652 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 7/7 7/26 653 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 7/7 Q 7/9 654 Erect Perimeter Columns 7/23 [ 7/23 655 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 7/26 | 7/26 656 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 7/12 7/28 657 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 7/12 ? 7/14 658 Erect Perimeter Columns and Remaining Brace 7/26 0 7/27 659 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 7/28 | 7/28 660 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 Sf) 7/15 7/29 661 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 7/15 rj 7/19 662 Erect Perimeter Columns 7/28 | 7/28 663~ Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 7/29 ( 7/29 ~664 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 7/20 7/30 665 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 7/20 ? 7/22 ~666~ Erect Perimeter Columns 7/29 I 7/29 667 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 7/30 | 7/30 ~~6~68~~ Structural Steel Area 49 thru 33 7/27 9/3 669~ Level Base Plate Setting Nuts 7/27 | 7/28 670 Slab on Grade In Place for Delivery ? 7/30 671 Deliver, Shake Out and Spread Steel 7/30 g 8/3 672 Panel Erection Complete ? 8/24 |
Page 16
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4thi Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quart Mar | Apr [ May I Jun I Jul I Aug I Sep ~| Oct I Nov I Del: \ Jan T Feb I Mar I )r 673 Brace Frame Column Line 41 7/29 W 8/4 674 Erect Wide Flange Columns, Beams and Chevrc 7/29 |f] 8/3 675 Plumb, Line, Weld and Temporary Brace 8/4 | 8/4 676 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 8/6 8/30 677 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 8/6 g 8/11 678 Erect Perimeter Columns and Remaining Brace 8/25 [] 8/27 679 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 8/27 B 8/30 680 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 8/3 8/26 681 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 8/3 [] 8/6 682 Erect Perimeter Columns 8/24 | 8/25 683 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 8/25 j 8/26 684 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 8/11 <r 9/2 685 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 8/11 D 8/16 1T8~6"~ Erect Perimeter Columns 8/27 g 8/30 687""' Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 8/30 g 9/2 "~688~ Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 8/16 1 9/3 689 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 8/16 g 8/19 6~90"~ Erect Perimeter Columns 8/30 fj 9/2 691 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 9/2 I 9/3 692~ Structural Steel Area 17 thru 1 8/23 10/11 ~~693~ Level Base Plate Setting Nuts 8/23 0 8/25 694 Slab on Grade In Place for Delivery ? 8/27 695 Deliver, Shake Out and Spread Steel 8/27 H 9/2 696 Panel Erection Complete ? 10/1 697 Brace Frame Column Line 9 8/25 9/3 698 Erect Wide Flange Columns, Beams and Chevrc 8/25 EB 9/2 699 Plumb, Line, Weld and Temporary Brace 9/2 I 9/3 700 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 9/2 10/5 ~7u1 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 9/2 Q 9/8 702 Erect Perimeter Columns 10/10 10/4 ~703~ Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 10/4 | 10/5 ~7bT~ Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 9/8 10/7 705 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 9/8 g 9/13 706 Erect Perimeter Columns and Remaining Brace 10/4 g 10/6 707 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 10/6 J 10/7 708 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 9/13 10/8 709 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 9/13 Q 9/16 710 Erect Perimeter Columns 10/6 | 10/7 711 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 10/7 | 10/8 Tf2~ Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 9/16 10/11 713 Erect Inboard Interior Columns 9/16 g 9/21 714 Erect Perimeter Columns 10/7 | 10/8 1 1 |
Page 17
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter ~ 1st Quarter |2nd Quart Mar I Apr i May I Jun I JuT I Aug I Sep 1 Oct I Nov Dec 1 Jan I Feb 1 Mar | Apr J 715 Plumb, Line, Weld and Certifications 10/8 jj 10/11 716 PANELIZED ROOF 7/15 10/25 717 Panelized Roof Area 33 thru 17 7/15 8/12 718 Deliver, Shake Out and Spread Joists / Sheathing 7/15 g 7/19 719 Set Up Panelized Tables 7/20 g 7/21 720 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 7/22 7/28 721 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 7/22 g 7/26 ~722~ Nail Roof Sheathing 7/26 g 7/27 723 Secure Nailing Inspection 7/28 | 7/28 724 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 7/29 ff 8/4 725 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 7/29 ? 8/2 726 Nail Roof Sheathing 8/2 g 8/3 727 Secure Nailing Inspection 8/4 [ 8/4 728 Roof System Approved For Roofing to Brace Fra + 8/4 729 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/3 *V 8/9 730 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 8/3 0 8/5 781 Nail Roof Sheathing 8/5 Q 8/6 732 Secure Nailing Inspection 8/9 | 8/9 733 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 8/6 WW 8/12 734 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 8/6 Q 8/10 ~73~5"~ Nail Roof Sheathing 8/10 0 8/11 736 Secure Nailing Inspection 8/12 I 8/12 737 Roof System Approved For Roofing to Separatio ? 8/12 738 Panelized Roof Area 49 thru 33 8/17 9/20 739~ Deliver, Shake Out and Spread Joists / Sheathing 8/17 Q 8/20 740 Set Up Panelized Tables 8/20 0 8/24 741 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 8/26 p 9/7 742 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 8/26 ? 9/2 743~~ Nail Roof Sheathing 8/30 0 9/3 744 Secure Nailing Inspection 9/3 fj 9/7 745 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/2 9/10 746 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 9/2 ? 9/8 747 Nail Roof Sheathing 9/7 0 9/9 748 Secure Nailing Inspection 9/9 J 9/10 749 Roof System Approved For Roofing to Brace Fra + 9/10 750~ Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/8 9/15 751 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 9/8 n 9/13 752 Nail Roof Sheathing 9/10 ? 9/14 753 Secure Nailing Inspection 9/14 1 9/15 754 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 9/13 9/20 755 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 9/13 0 9/16 ~756~~ Nail Roof Sheathing 9/15 0 9/17 |
Page 18
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 12ndLQuarteL l3rd Q uarter 14th Quarter J 1st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun | Jul I Aug TSep I Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan 1 Feb~T Mar I Apr T~ 757 Secure Nailing Inspection 9/17 g 9/20 758 Roof System Approved For Roofing to Separatio + 9/20 759 Panelized Roof Area 17 thru 1 9/24 10/25 760~ Deliver, Shake Out and Spread Joists / Sheathing 9/24 g 9/29 761 Set Up Panelized Tables 9/29 g 10/1 762 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/5 10/12 763 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 10/5 0 10/8 764 Nail Roof Sheathing 10/7 | 10/11 765 Secure Nailing Inspection 10/11 [ 10/12 766 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/8 10/15 767 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 10/8 fj 10/13 768 Nail Roof Sheathing 10/12 | 10/14 769 Secure Nailing Inspection 10/14(10/15 770 Roof System Approved For Roofing to Brace Frs + 10/15 ~771 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/13 10/20 772 Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 10/13 ? 10/18 ~~773 Nail Roof Sheathing 10/15 0 10/19 ~~774~~ Secure Nailing Inspection 10/19 J 10/20 775 ~ Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 10/18 10/25 ~TW Erect Girders, Joists and Panelized Sheathing 10/18 Q 10/21 777 Nail Roof Sheathing 10/20 D 10/22 778 Secure Nailing Inspection 10/22 g 10/25 779 Roof System Approved For Roofing to Separatio ? 10/25 780 ROOF SYSTEMS 7/28 11/4 781 Roof Curbs / Roof Drains / Penetrations 7/28 10/27 782 Roof Curbs / Drains Area 33 thru 17 7/28 8/16 783 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 7/28 0 7/30 784 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/4 Q 8/6 785 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/9 0 8/11 ~78~6~~ Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 8/12 ? 8/16 787 Roof Curbs / Drains Area 49 thru 33 9/3 9/22 ~78~8 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/3 Q 9/9 ~789 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/9 ? 9/14 790 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/14 0 9/17 791 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 9/17 ? 9/22 792 Roof Curbs / Drains Area 17 thru 1 10/11 10/27 j 793 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/11 0 10/14 794 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/14 Q 10/19 795 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/19 Q 10/22 :T9~6~ Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 10/22 g 10/27 797 Membrane Roof System 7/30 11/1 798 Membrane Roof System Area 33 thru 17 7/30 8/19 |
Page 19
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name J 2ndJ2juarter 13rd Quarter l 4th Quarter R siQuarter 12ndQuart Mar [ Apr I May T Jun Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov | Dec I Jan T Feb [ Mar I ApT 799 Pre Roof Meeting 7/30 | 7/30 800 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/2 8/6 801 Load Roofing Materials 8/2 0 8/3 ~~802~ Base and Two Ply 8/4 rj 8/5 ~~803~~~ Detail and Cap Sheet 8/5 0 8/6 ~~80~4~ Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/4 WV 8/11 805 Load Roofing Materials 8/4 [j 8/5 806 Base and Two Ply 8/9 Q 8/10 807 Detail and Cap Sheet 8/10 Q 8/11 808 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/6 p 8/16 809 ~ Load Roofing Materials 8/6 g 8/9 810 Base and Two Ply 8/12 0 8/13 ~&vT~ Detail and Cap Sheet 8/13 Q 8/16 812 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 8/10 W 8/19 ~873~ Load Roofing Materials 8/10 0 8/11 814 Base and Two Ply 8/17 Q 8/18 815 Detail and Cap Sheet 8/18 g 8/19 ~8T6~~ Membrane Roof System Area 49 thru 33 9/3 9/27 817 Pre Roof Meeting 9/3 | 9/7 818 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/7 *9/14 819 Load Roofing Materials 9/7 [ 9/9 820 Base and Two Ply 9/9 Q 9/13 821 Detail and Cap Sheet 9/10 Q 9/14 822 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/9 9/17 823 Load Roofing Materials 9/9 a 9/13 824 Base and Two Ply 9/14 Q 9/16 825 Detail and Cap Sheet 9/15 Q 9/17 826 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/13 9/22 827 Load Roofing Materials 9/13 0 9/15 828 Base and Two Ply 9/17 Q 9/21 829 Detail and Cap Sheet 9/20 g 9/22 830 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 9/15 i 9/27 831 Load Roofing Materials 9/15 1 9/17 832 Base and Two Ply 9/22 0 9/24 833 Detail and Cap Sheet 9/23 Q 9/27 834 Membrane Roof System Area 17 thru 1 10/11 11 /1 835 Pre Roof Meeting 10/11 J 10/12 836 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/12 10/19 837 Load Roofing Materials 10/12 | 10/14 ~838 Base and Two Ply 10/14 0 10/18 ~839"~ Detail and Cap Sheet 10/15 ? 10/19 840 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/14 10/22 |
Page 20
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter, 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter |JsLQuarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul I Aug I Sep I 6ct I Nov I Dec | Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr 841 Load Roofing Materials 10/14 Q] 10/18 842 Base and Two Ply 10/19 | 10/21 ~~843~ Detail and Cap Sheet 10/20 | 10/22 844 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/18 10/27 845 Load Roofing Materials 10/18 g 10/20 ~846"~ Base and Two Ply 10/22 | 10/26 847 Detail and Cap Sheet 10/25 g 10/27 848 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 10/20 11/1 849 Load Roofing Materials 10/20 fl 10/22 850 Base and Two Ply 10/27 g 10/29 ~85T Detail and Cap Sheet 10/28 n 11/1 852 Finish Roof Accessories and Sheet Metal 8/9 « 11/4 853 Roof Accessories and Sheet Metal Area 33 thru 1 8/9 p 8/24 854 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/9 Q 8/11 855 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/12 ? 8/16 856 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/17 g 8/19 857 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 8/20 |J 8/24 858 Roof Accessories and Sheet Metal Area 49 thru ; 9/14 9/30 859 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/14 rj 9/17 860 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/17 ? 9/22 861 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/22 Q 9/27 862 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 9/27 rj 9/30 863 Roof Accessories and Sheet Metal Area 17 thru 1 10/19 11/4 864 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/19 Q 10/22 865 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/22 ? 10/27 ~866 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/27 rj 11/1 867 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 11/10 11/4 868 Roof System Watertight 8/24 11/4 ~869 Roof Systems Watertight Area 33 thru 17 * 8/24 870 Roof Systems Watertight Area 49 thru 33 4 9/30 871 Roof Systems Watertight Area 17 thru 1 4 11/4 872 EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEMS 7/30 12/15 873 Sack and Patch 7/30 J 11/4 874 Sack and Patch Area 33 thru 17 7/30 8/13 875 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 7/30 |~~| 8/9 876 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/10 g 8/13 877 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 7/30 m 8/9 878 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/10 0 8/13 879 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/16 0 8/19 880 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 8/20 n 8/30 881 Sack and Patch Area 49 thru 33 9/2 9/30 882 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/2 r~l 9/14 |
Page 21
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 12nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter 11st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun Jul I Auq T Sep I Oct I Nov | Dec Pjan | Feb 1 Mar 1 Apr \ 883 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/14 jp 9/20 884 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/20 R 9/24 885 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 9/24 g 9/30 886 Sack and Patch Area 17 thru 1 10/8 11 /4 887 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/8 g 10/14 888 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/14 rfl 10/20 889 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/20 g 10/26 890 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 10/26 [Q 11/4 ~891 Overhead and Man Doors 8/10 11/12 892 Overhead and Man Doors Area 33 thru 17 8/10 9/9 893 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/10 ? 8/16 894 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/17 ? 8/23 895 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/24 rj 8/30 896 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 9/2 ? 9/9 897 Overhead and Man Doors Area 49 thru 33 9/14 10/12 898 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/14 H 9/21 899 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/21 gg 9/28 900 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/28 Q 10/5 901 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 10/5 H 10/12 902 Overhead and Man Doors Area 17 thru 1 10/15 i 11/12 903 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/15 Q 10/22 904 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/22 gg 10/29 905 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/29 11/5 906 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 11/5 0 11/12 907 Window Features with Framing, Skin System and Glaz 8/10 12/15 ~~908~ Window Systems Area 33 thru 17 8/10 9/16 909 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/10 | | | | I cm 9/16 910 Window Systems Area 49 thru 33 9/17 10/21 911 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/17 11 ||| I Ml 10/21 912 Window Systems Area 17 thru 1 11/2 12/15 913 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 11/2 I I I I I I I I I II 12/15 914 Caulking and Prep 8/10 11/12 915 Caulking and Prep Area 33 thru 17 8/10 9/9 916 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/10 ? 8/16 917 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/17 g 8/19 918 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/20 g 8/24 919 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 9/2 ? 9/9 920 Caulking and Prep Area 49 thru 33 9/14 10/5 921 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/14 ? 9/22 922 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/22 a 9/27 923 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/27 [J 9/30 924 Column Line 37to 33 (149,413 sf) 9/30 a 10/5 |
Page 22
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1 st Quarter 2nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul f Aug I Sep | Oct I Nov I Dec 1 Jan I Feb T Mar | Apr 925 Caulking and Prep Area 17 thru i 10/14 11/12 926 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/14 jQ 10/19 927 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/20 Q 10/25 928 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/26 g 10/29 929 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 11/4 gg 11/12 ~930~ Painting and Trim 8/17 12/9 ~~931 Painting and Trim Area 33 thru 17 8/17 P 9/16 932 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/17 ? 8/23 933 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/24 ? 8/30 934 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 9/2 ? 9/9 935 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 9/10 ? 9/16 936 Painting and Trim Area 49 thru 33 9/22 10/27 937 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/22 [ ] 10/6 938 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 10/6 Q 10/13 939 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 10/13 ? 10/20 940 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 10/20 ? 10/27 941 Painting and Trim Area 17 thru 1 10/27 12/9 942"' Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/27 ? 11/3 ~~943~ Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 11/3 n 1110 944 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 11/10 ? 11/17 945 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 11/17 I: 1 12/9 946 Exterior Skin Systems Watertight 9/16 M 2/9 947 Exterior Systems Watertight Area 33 thru 17 ? 9/16 948 Exterior Systems Watertight Area 49 thru 33 ? 10/27 949 Exterior Systems Watertight Area 17 thru 1 ? 12/9 950 INTERIOR FINISH SYSTEMS 7/28 1/28 951 | Pour Strips and Block outs No Pits 7/28 11/8 952 Pour Strips and Block outs Area 33 thru 17 7/28 8/24 953 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 7/28 gg 8/3 954 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/4 g 8/10 955 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/11 H 8/17 956 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 8/18 rj] 8/24 957 Pour Strips and Block outs Area 49 thru 33 9/3 10/4 958 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/3 LJJ 9/13 959 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/13 ffl 9/20 960 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/20 gg 9/27 961 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 9/27 Q 10/4 962 Pour Strips and Block outs Area 17 thru 1 10/11 11/8 963 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/11 rj 10/18 ~964~ Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/18 fg 10/25 965 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 10/25 EH 11/1 ~~966~ Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 11/1 H 11/8 |
Page 23
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr I Mav~ I Jun i Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov I Dec [ Jan \ Feb I Mar [ Apr | 967 Overhead Distribution 7/28 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦m 1/28 968 Fire Sprinklers 7/28 « 12/20 969 Fire Sprinklers and Risers Area 33 thru 17 7/28 9/13 970 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 7/28 EH 8/6 971 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/9 LB 8/18 972 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/19 fm 8/30 973 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 9/2 [ffj 9/13 974 Fire Sprinklers and Risers Area 49 thru 33 9/14 10/27 975 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/14 Eg 9/23 ~976"~ Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/24 nm 1Q/5 977 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 10/6 rJS 10/15 978 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 10/18 [g 10/27 979 Fire Sprinklers and Risers Area 17 thru 1 10/28 12/20 980 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/28 EFJ3 11/8 981 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 11/9 0 11/18 ~982~ Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 11/19 FFFFfl 12/8 983 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 12/9 [ffl 12/20 984 Exit Signs, Alarms and Other 8/6 11/15 985 Exit Signs, Alarms and Other Area 33 thru 1 8/6 *p 9/7 986 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/6 E 8/12 987 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/13 FJ 8/19 988 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/20 H 8/26 989 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 8/27 [fig 9/7 990 Exit Signs, Alarms and Other Area 49 thru 3: 9/13 i 10/11 991 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/13 [Q 9/20 992 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/20 g 9/27 993 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 9/27 rfl 10/4 994"' Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 10/4 g 10/11 995 Exit Signs, Alarms and Other Area 17 thru 1 10/18 »¦ 11/15 996 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 10/18 E 10/25 997 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 10/25 11/1 998 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 11/1 Q 11/8 999 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 11/8 Ffl 11/15 Tooo Overhead Lighting and Power 8/6 i 1/17 1001 Overhead Lighting and Power Area 33 thru 1 8/6 1 9/15 1002 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/6 [£g 8/16 1003 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/16 Q 8/24 ~Tb04~ Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 8/24 [g 9/3 TdOET Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 9/7 EE 9/15 1006 Overhead Lighting and Power Area 49 thru : 9/16 P 11/10 1007 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/16 gg 9/29 ~Tod8~~ Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 9/3 0j=FH1 10/13 |
Page 24
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter 11 st Quarter 12nd Quart Mar I Apr | May |~Jun Jul I Aug | Sep ~| Oct I Nov I Dec \ Jan | Feb I Mar | Apr 1009 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 10/14 r 10/27 1010 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 10/28 EEE 11/10 1011 Overhead Lighting and Power Area 17 thru 1 11/11 1/17 1012 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 11/11 FfTrTI 12/2 1013 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 12/3 m 12/16 1014 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 12/17 rTTTH 1/3 1015 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 1/4 FFFfl 1/17 1016 Floor Joint Filler / Re Saw 8/13 hb h m h h hm 1/25 ~1Q17~ Floor Joint Filler / Re Saw Area 33 thru 17 8/13 9/17 ~ 1018 Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/13 gg 8/19 1019 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/23 fj 8/27 1020 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 9/2 EB 9/9 1021 Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 9/13 fj 9/17 1022 Floor Joint Filler / Re Saw Area 49 thru 33 9/30 11/18 1023 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 9/30 Eg 10/7 1024 Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 10/14 H 10/21 1025 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 10/28 flg 11/4 1026 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 11/11 11/18 1027 Floor Joint Filler /Re Saw Area 17 thru 1 12/3 i 1/25 1028 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 12/3 ?] 12/10 1029 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 12/17 FJS 12/27 Td30~ Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 1/4 H 111 l03T~ Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 1/18 BfJ 1/25 1032 Floor Cleaning and Sealer 8/19 1/28 ~Tb~3~3~ Floor Cleaning and Sealer Area 33 thru 17 8/19 9/20 ~T034~ Column Line 33 to 29 (149,413 sf) 8/19 FJ 8/23 1035 Column Line 29 to 25 (149,360 sf) 8/30 Q 9/3 1036 Column Line 25 to 21 (149,360 sf) 9/10 ffl 9/14 ~1037~ Column Line 21 to 17 (149,413 sf) 9/16 g 9/20 1038 Floor Cleaning and Sealer Area 49 thru 33 10/8 ¦ ¦ 11/23 1039 Column Line 49 to 45 (150,159 sf) 10/8 g 10/12 ~T © 40~ Column Line 45 to 41 (149,360 sf) 10/22 rj 10/26 1041 Column Line 41 to 37 (149,360 sf) 11/5 Ffl 11/9 1042 Column Line 37 to 33 (149,413 sf) 11/19 0 11/23 1043 Floor Cleaning and Sealer Area 17 thru 1 12/13 1/28 1044 Column Line 17 to 13 (149,413 sf) 12/13 g 12/15 1045 Column Line 13 to 9 (149,360 sf) 12/28 | 12/30 1046 Column Line 9 to 5 (149,360 sf) 1/12 g 1/14 ,1047 Column Line 5 to 1 (153,425 sf) 1/26 D 1/28 1048 PROGRESSIVE MILESTONES 9/16 3/18 1049 Progressive Inspection and Occupancy 9/16 3/18 1050 Progressive Inspection and Occupancy Area 331 9/16 10/1 |
Page 25
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter J?rdJ3y arter 4!h Quarter 1st Quarter |2nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun Jul I Aug T Sep | Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan | Feb I Mar | Apr I 1051 Final Cleaning 9/17 rj 9/21 1052 Progress City Inspection 9/16 FJ 9/20 1053 Utility Release and Service Start 9/21 g 9/23 1054 System Testing and Start up 9/24 g 9/28 1055 Temporary Inspection 9/29 0 10/1 1056 Start Mezzanine Subcontractor + 9/21 1057 Progressive Inspection and Occupancy Area 491 10/28 12/14 1058 Final Cleaning 12/2 Q 12/6 1059 Progress City Inspection 10/28 ffj 11/1 1060 Utility Release and Service Start 11/2 g 11/8 1061 System Testing and Start up 12/7 [] 12/9 1062 Temporary Inspection 12/10 g 12/14 1063 Partial Temporary Occupancy +12/14 1064 Progressive Inspection and Occupancy Area 171 1/18 2/10 1065 Final Cleaning 1/31 | 2/2 1066 Progress City Inspection 1/18 | 1/20 1067 Utility Release and Service Start 1/21 ES 1/27 1068 System Testing and Start up 2/3 rj 2/7 1069 Temporary Inspection 2/8 g 2/10 1070 Partial Temporary Occupancy ? 2/10 1071 Progressive Inspection and Occupancy ?3/18 1072 All Tenant Improvement Areas ? 3/18 1073 Final Occupancy Process ? 3/18 1074 Final Inspection / Certifications for Entire Developmer ? 3/18 1075 INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS/TENANT IMPROVEMENTS 6/25 i 3/18 1076 MEZZANINE IMPROVEMENTS Area 49 thru 45 6/25 10/4 ~T077 Below Grade Utilities 6/25 7/7 1078 Rough in Plumbing 6/25 FFfl 7/7 1079 Rough in Electrical 6/25 Eg 7/7 1080 Concrete 6/28 f 7/13 1081 Interior Foundations and Pit 6/28 f 7/13 1082 Verify Line and Grade 6/28 | 6/28 1083 Layout and Excavation 6/29 g 7/1 1084 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt A 6/29 | 6/29 1085 Install Rebar 7/1 | 7/1 1086 Install Bolts and Embeds 7/1 | 7/1 1087 Place Foundations 7/2 rj 7/6 1088 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/7 | 7/7 1089 Ready for Slab Sequence ? 7/7 1090 Install Erection Pads 7/8 [ 7/8 1091 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/7 B 7/13 1092 ~ Erect Shear Walls with Exterior Panels ? 7/13 j |
Page 26
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter J 1st Quarter, 2nd Quart Mar I Apr I May I Jun Jul [ Aug [ Sep 1 Oct \ Nov 1 Dec 1 Jan | Feb 1 Mar I Apr 1093 Roof Columns In Place Panelized Roof System Con + 9/3 1094 Steel and Structural Deck 9/3 pi p 10/4 1095 Erect Mezzanine Columns and Beams 9/3 ? 9/10 1096 Erect Bar Joists and Misc Steel 9/10 ? 9/16 1097 Install Stair Pans 9/16 Q 9/20 1098 Metal Decking 9/20 ? 9/27 1099 Edge Closures and Studs 9/27 | 9/30 1100 Place Concrete over Metal Deck 9/30 rj 10/4 1101 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS 9/27 3/18 1102 Exterior Wall Systems Weather Tight + 10/27 1:103 Roof Structure Weather Tight + 9/30 1104 Main Office Area 49 thru 45 9/27 3/18 1105 Ground Floor 9/27 ¦ ¦ ¦ 1 2/8 1106 Start Improvements ? 9/27 1107 Overhead Rough in 9/27 W 10/4 1108 Fire Sprinkler 9/27 fg 10/4 1109 Plumbing 9/27 gg 10/4 1110 Mechanical 9/27 fj 10/4 1111 Electrical 9/27 q 10/4 1112 Other 9/27 n 10/4 1113 Walls 9/27 12/9 1114 Metal Stud Framing for Walls and Soffi 9/27 I I 10/18 1115 Wall Rough in 10/7 * 10/21 T?16~ Plumbing 10/7 |||| 10/21 1117 Electrical 10/7 fZH 1°/21 ~T\W Other 10/7 fHH 10/21 1119 One Side Drywall 10/19 n 10/29 1120 Insulation 10/27 Q 11/1 1121 Second Side Drywall 10/28 [ ] 11/11 1122 Tape and 1st Coat Walls 11/8 n 11/18 1123 Finish Coat Walls / Texture 11/15 [ | 12/7 T»24~ Prep Walls for Grid 12/7 Q 12/9 TT25~ Ceilings 11/11 1/10 1126 Ceiling Framing 11/11 Q 11/15 1127 Install Ceiling Grid 12/9 ? 12/21 1128 Overhead Fixtures 12/16 12/23 1129 Cut Fire Sprinkler Drops 12/16 ? 12/23 1130 Mechanical Drops 12/16 ? 12/23 1131 Electrical Fixtures 12/16 Q 12/23 1132 Other 12/16 D 12/23 1133 Drywall Ceilings 11/15 11/23 1134 Hang Drywall Ceilings 11/15 fl 11/17 |
Page 27
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter iisLQuarter 2n d Qyart Mar I Apr I May I Jun \ Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov | Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar [ Apr [ 1135 tape and 1st Coat Ceiling 11/17 g 11/19 1136 Finish Coat Ceilings / Texture 11/19 0 11/23 1137 Acoustic Ceiling 12/23 1/10 1138 Drop Cut In Tiles and Tiles at Fixti 12/23 fj 12/29 1139 Overhead Inspections 12/29 ? 1/3 1140 Drop Ceiling Tiles 1/3 ? 1/10 ~1141 Conductors and Controls 11/11 12/16 1142 Pull Conductors and Make up Wiring 11/11 EQ 11/18 1143 Pull Control Conductors and Make up 12/9 rg 12/16 ~V\W Install Door Frames 12/9 rj 12/13 1145 Elevator 10/11 mib 12/23 1146 Rough in Hoist way 10/11 El 10/20 1147 Build Cab 10/20 CD 10/29 1148 Finish Hoist way and Equipment 10/29 FJJ 11/5 1149 Finish Cab 11/5 Q 11/12 1150 Preliminary Testing 11/12 g 11/17 ~TT5T~ Schedule Elevator Inspection 11/17 ffffffl 12/9 1152 Permanent Power, Phone and Adjustm 12/9 Q3 12/16 1153 State Inspection and Certification 12/16 gg 12/23 1154 Finishes 11/23 2/3 ~1155"~ Ceramic Tile 12/13 12/28 1156 Toilet Room Floors and Walls 12/13 rffl 12/28 ~Tl57~ Other Floor Areas 12/13 g 12/17 1158 Millwork 12/13 * 1/20 1159 Cabinets and Counters 12/13 g 12/16 1160 Finish Carpentry / Paneling / Trim 12/13 H 12/22 1161 Base and Other Trim 1/17 rj 1/20 1162 Doors 12/13 2/3 1163 Swing Doors 12/13 03 12/20 1164 Install Hardware 1/24 ? 2/3 1165 Painting and Finishes 11/23 1/27 ~1T66 Paint Walls and Ceilings 11/23 EECEE 12/15 1167 Finish Trim and Other 1/20 @ 1/27 1168 Wall Covering 12/15 Q 12/20 1169~~ Floor Covering 12/13 1/17 1170 VCT / Sheet Goods 12/20 g 12/23 1171 Wood Flooring 1/10 fj 1/13 1172 Carpeting 1/10 ? 1/17 1173 Other 12/13 p 12/15 ~~V\W Access Flooring 12/13 a 12/16 1175 Finish Fixtures and Trim 12/28 > 2/8 1176 Plumbing Fixtures 12/28 > 1/17 |
Page 28
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 14th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quart Mar | Apr I May I Jun Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov 1 Dec \ Jan 1 Feb ~| Mar I Apr 1177 Set Plumbing Fixtures 12/28 Q 1/5 1178 Finish Fixtures and Trim 1/10 FJ 1/17 1179 Toilet Partitions and Accessories 1/5 1/20 1180 Toilet Partitions 1/5 0 1/10 1181 Toilet Accessories 1/17 | 1/20 1182~ Mechanical Thermostats / Control Devi 1/27 Q 1/31 ~Tf83 Electrical Cover Plates and Trim 1/27 [§j 2/3 1184 Misc Accessories / Mats / FE Cabinets 1/27 ? 2/3 1185 Window Coverings 1/27 FJ 2/1 1186 Final Cleaning 2/3 ? 2/8 1187 2nd Floor Mezzanine 10/4 b 2/22 1188~ Start Improvements ? 10/4 1189 Overhead Rough in 10/4 WW 10/11 1190 Fire Sprinkler 10/4 F£10/11 1191 Plumbing 10/4 LTJ 10/11 1192 Mechanical 10/4 FJj 10/11 ~UW Electrical 10/4 a 10/11 Tm Other 10/4 LTJ 10/11 1195 Walls 10/11 12/23 1196 Metal Stud Framing for Walls and Soffi 10/11 | n 11/1 1197 Wall Rough in 10/21 11/4 ~TT9~8~ Plumbing 10/21 CZH 114 ~TT99~ Electrical 10/21 OH 11/4 1200 Other 10/21 [ ] 11/4 1201 One Side Drywall 11/2 ? 11/12 1202 Insulation 11/10 ? 11/15 1203 Second Side Drywall 11/11 | | 12/3 1204 Tape and 1st Coat Walls 11/22 I I 12/10 1205 Finish Coat Walls / Texture 12/7 [ ] 12/21 1206 Prep Walls for Grid 12/21 D 12/23 1207 Ceilings 12/3 i » 1/24 ~T2~0~8~~ Ceiling Framing 12/3 ? 12/7 1209 Install Ceiling Grid 12/23 L~Z3 1/6 1210 Overhead Fixtures 1/3 1/10 1211 Cut Fire Sprinkler Drops 1/3 ? 1/10 ~T21~2~ Mechanical Drops 1/3 ? 1/10 1213 Electrical Fixtures 1/3 ? 1/10 ~T214~ Other 1/3 D 1/10 1215 Drywall Ceilings 12/7* 12/15 1216 Hang Drywall Ceilings 12/7 g 12/9 1217 Tape and 1st Coat Ceiling 12/9 ffi 12/13 12i~ir Finish Coat Ceilings / Texture 12/13 fl 12/15 |
Page 29
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter j 4th Quarter 1 st Quarter 2nd Quart Mar [ Apr I May T Jun [ Jul 1 Aug ] Sep I Oct 1 Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr 1219 Acoustic Ceiling 1/10 m? 1/24 ~T2~20 Drop Cut In Tiles and Tiles at Fixti 1/10 0 1/13 1221 Overhead Inspections 1/13 | 1/17 1222 Drop Ceiling Tiles 1/17 ? 1/24 1223 Conductors and Controls 12/3 m? 1/3 T224 Pull Conductors and Make up Wiring 12/3 12/10 1225 Pull Control Conductors and Make up 12/23 FR 1/3 1226 Install Door Frames 12/23 O 12/28 1227 Finishes 12/15 ¦ ¦ 2/17 1228 Ceramic Tile 12/28 1/12 1229 Toilet Room Floors and Walls 12/28 m=H 1/12 1230 Other Floor Areas 12/28 H 1/4 1231 Millwork 12/28 2/3 T232 Cabinets and Counters 12/28 0 1/3 1233 Finish Carpentry/Paneling/Trim 12/28 m 1/7 1234 Base and Other Trim 1/31 Q 2/3 1235 Doors 12/28 1 2/17 ~~1~236 Swing Doors 12/28 ffl 1/5 1237 Install Hardware 2/7 f | 2/17 1238 Painting and Finishes 12/15 2/10 1239 Paint Walls and Ceilings 12/15 F£H 12/30 1240 Finish Trim and Other 2/3 ? 2/10 1241 Wall Covering 12/30 fjj 1/5 1242 Floor Covering 12/28 1/31 1243 VCT / Sheet Goods 1/5 Q 1/10 1244 Wood Flooring 1/24 g 1/27 1245 Carpeting 1/24 Q 1/31 1246 Other 12/28 fl 12/30 1247 Access Flooring 12/28 g 1/3 1~248 Finish Fixtures and Trim 1/12 1 2/22 1249 Plumbing Fixtures 1/12 1/31 1250 Set Plumbing Fixtures 1/12 ED 1/19 1251 Finish Fixtures and Trim 1/24 FJ3 1/31 1252 Toilet Partitions and Accessories 1/19 1 2/3 1253 Toilet Partitions 1/19 Fj 1/24 1254 Toilet Accessories 1/31 B 2/3 1255 Mechanical Thermostats / Control Devi 2/10 g 2/14 1256 Electrical Cover Plates and Trim 2/10 n 2/17 1257 Misc Accessories / Mats / FE Cabinet: 2/10 ? 2/17 1258 Window Coverings 2/10 FJ 2/15 1259 Final Cleaning 2/17 ? 2/22 1260 1 Tenant Improvement Inspection 2/22 3/18 |
Page 30
J D Diffenbaugh, Inc HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SKECHERS for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 12nd Quarter ~ 13rd Quarter 4th Quarter 11st Quarter !jlnd Quart Mar I Apr [ May I Jun | Jul I Aug I Sep 1 Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I 1261 City Inspections 2/22 ? 3/1 1262 Power and Utilities In Place 3/1 ? 3/8 l~263~ Start up and Testing 3/8 ? 3/15 1264 Ready for Occupancy 3/15 D 3/18 1265 REMOTE AREA TENANT IMPROVEMENTS 8/23 ji 1/19 1266 Remote Office Column Lines 31 A 8/23 II I 11 I I I I I I 11 I I I I I 11/3 1267 Remote Office Column Lines 17 A 9/8 | | | I I I I I I I I I I i 11/3 1268 Remote Office Column Lines 16 A 10/12 I I I I M I I I n 11/23 1269 Remote Toilet Rooms Column Lines 5 A 11/10 FFHI I I I I I I I FFFH 1/19 1270 Remote Toilet Rooms Column Lines 9 N 11/5 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1/19 1271 Remote Office Column Lines 9 N 11/5 II I I I I I I I I I I I I ITTT1 1/19 1272 SITE IMPROVEMENTS 4/20 J mm 3/18 1273 Anticipated Site Development Improvements 4/20 I , ; ; ; : ; : : : :; : ,: i 3/18 |
Page 31
J. 0. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I, LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ifj [Task Name I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul I Aua ~ Sep Oct Nov I Dec Jan ~| Feb Mar | Apr May I J MILESTONES 4/19 1^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^^^^^^^^^-^^^""^^^"^^^"^^^-^^^^^^^ 3/17 2 CLIENTS KEY OBJECTIVE MILESTONES 4/19 ^^^-^^¦^^^¦^^^^^^^^ 3/17 3 Start Grading Operations ? 4/19 4 Certify Center 1/3rd Building Pad 4 5/21 5 Start Mezzanine / Racking Vendor « 9/20 6 Shell Completion + 3/17 7 WEATHER DELAY ALLOCATIONS 4/26 ^a^iM^iBMia^^MB^MB^BB^aM^ 11/29 8 Allocation 1st Qtr Schedule-2 Days ? 4/26 9 Allocation 2nd Qtr Schedule 3 Days + 6/1 10 Allocations 3rd Qtr Schedule 2 Days ? 8/31 11 Allocation 4th Qtr Schedule 3 Days ? 11/29 12 CRITICAL SITE MILESTONES 6/22 ^^^^^^^^ 9/14 13 Temporary Water in Place for Form Lumber ? 6/22 14 Temporary Water in Place for Roof Structure ? 7/15 15 Access Truck Route for Conveyance Vendor ? 9/14 16 CRITICAL CARRY OVER SHELL MILESTONES 7/2 pw ^mm^h^mhb^b^ 12/7 17 Panels Places as Casting Area for Misc. Panels 7/2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^» 9/17 18 Center 3rd Column Line A ? 7/2 19 Center3rd Column Line N ? 7/12 ~~W East 3rd Column Line A ? 8/3 21 East 3rd Column Line N ? 8/10 ~~22 West 3rd Column Line A ? 9/1 JO West 3rd Column Line N ? 9/17 ~~24 Panel Lift Sequence 7/20 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ 9/29 25 Center 3rd Shell Panels Erection Complete ? 7/20 26 East 3rd Shell Panels Erection Complete ? 8/20 ~27 West 3rd Shell Panels Erection Complete ? 9/29 28 Exterior Treatments Complete 9/16 ^"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 12/7 29 Center 3rd Exterior Treatment Ready for Site Work ? 9/16 30 East 3rd Exterior Treatment Ready for Site Work ? 10/28 ~~31 West 3rd Exterior Treatment Ready for Site Work ? 12/7 ~32 33 GRADING MOBILIZATION 4/12*^4/16 34 Mobilization 4/12 V* 4/16 35 Mobilize Equipment 4/12 ffl 4/16 ~~36~~ Establish Water 4/12 ? 4/16 T7~ ROUGH GRADING 4/19 »^^^~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 8/20 38 Temporary Erosion Control Measures 4/19 W 4/22 39 Initial Erosion Control 4/19 0 4/21 40 Diversion/Temporary Drainage Measures 4/20(3 4/22 ~~41 Clear and Grub (+/-15 acres/day) 4/20^^^^5/12 42 Column Line 17 thru 33 4/20 p 4/21 |
Page 1
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 I 1Q11 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Auq See Pel Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___43 Column Line 33 thru 49 4/22 0 4/23 44 Column Line 49 thru Property Line 4/28 fj 4/29 45 Column Line 17 thru 1 4/30 p 5/3 46 Column Line 1 thru West Property Line 5/4 g 5/5 47 Southern Drainage Area 5/6 | 5/6 ~~48 Parcel 2 5/7 fj 5/10 ~49 Parcel 1 5/11 g 5/12 50 Building 4/22 ^^^^^"^-^^^^ 7/21 51 Overexcavation Building Pad 4/22 ^^^«^^^^^^^"^ 7/13 52 Develop Bottom / Stockpile 4/22 ? 4/28 53 Column Line 17 thru 33 4/29 I 1 5/12 54 Column Line 33 thru 49 5/13 I I 5/28 ~ 55 Column Line 17 thru 1 6/29 I 1 7/13 56 Fine Grade Building Pad 5/11 ^^^^"^^^""^^ 7/20 57 Column Line 17 thru 33 5/11 r_Z] 5/19 58 Column Line 33 thru 49 5/27 II I I I I I I I 6/18 59 Column Line 17 thru 1 7/12 II 7/20 60 Certify Building Pad 5/18 ^^^^^^^^^^ 7/21 61 Column Line 17 thru 33 5/18 Q 5/20 62 Column Line 33 thru 49 6/17 rjj 6/21 ~ 63 Column Line 17 thru 1 7/19 0 7/21 64 Site 5/4 ^^"^m^^^^^^^^^^ 8/20 65 Box Storm Drain Excavation / Temporary Slope 5/4 C3 512 66 South Truck Court 6/7 | | 6/16 67 East Side 6/17 I 1 6/28 ~ 68 Eucalyptus Street 7/22 r_TJ 7/29 69 Parcel 2 7/30 EP 8/4 70 Parcel 3 8/5 EH 8/10 71 North Truck 8/11 53 8/16 72 West Side 8/17 g 8/20 ~^73 TEMPORARY FIRE WATER and ACCESS ROAD 4/29 f^«^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 9/7 74 Temporary 12 Above Grade Fire Water Line 4/29^^^^5/18 75 Point of Connection for Temporary Service 4/29 J 4/30 76 Install Above Grade Water System 2,700 If 5/3 rTTTI 5/14 77 Temporary Connection to On-Site Fire Water System 5/17 g 5/18 78 Below Grade Fire Water In Place Column Line 17 thru 49 ? 6/16 79 Temporary Above Grade on Building Pad Column Line 17 In P « 6/23 80 Remaining Below Grade Water In Place Column Line 1 thru 11 ? 9/7 81 ~l32~SITE IMPROVEMENTS 5/6 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2/16 83 Utilities 5/6 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^""^^^^^ 9/17 84 Box Storm Drain 5/6 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 8/12 |
Page 2
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID jTask Name I I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 10.11 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___85 Excavation Complete + 5/12 86 Box Storm Drain Form, Ftebar, Place, Strip and ( 5/6 ^^""^^^^^^"^"^^ 8/5 87 Station 95+00 thru 98+00 5/6 I I I I I I I 5/26 88 Station 95+00 to 108+00 5/27 [I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 8/5 89 Station 122+56 to 108+00 5/6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fffll 8/5 90 Critical Backfill Zone No Scrappers 6/10 ifm^m^mma^a^mm^f 8/12 ~91 Station 95+00 thru 98+00 6/10 FH 6/16 92 Station 95+00 to 108+00 7/1 I I I I I I I I I II I II 8/12 93 Station 122+56 to 108+00 7/1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 8/12 94 Storm Drain Laterals 7/16 ^"^^^^^ 8/23 95 Lateral F-7 7/16 JSEl 7/26 96 Lateral F-6 7/22 EB 7/30 97 Lateral F-5 7/28 D3 8/5 98 Lateral D-6 8/3 FFFfl 8/11 99 Lateral D-5 8/9 p^ 8/17 100 Lateral F-2 8/13 ffi 8/19 101 Lateral F-2A 8/17 ffl 8/23 102 Sewer 6/17 i^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 9/17 103 East Truck Lane -1,200 f I 6/29 ^^^^ 7/22 104 Survey 6/29 [ 6/29 105 Excavate 6/30 f£FJ 7/8 106 Install Sewer Piping 7/2 am 7/12 107 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Risers 7/12 a 7/14 108 Backfill Lifts 7/13 H 7/20 109 Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 7/21 rj 7/22 110 South Truck Court (West End) 450 If 6/17 ^^^ 7/1 111 Survey 6/17 J 6/17 112 Excavate 6/18 JfJ 6/21 113 Install Sewer Piping 6/22 g 6/23 114 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Risers 6/23 Q 6/25 115 Backfill Lifts 6/28 E 6/29 116 Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 6/30 J 7/1 117 South Truck Court (East End) 370 If 6/18 ^^^* 7/6 118 Survey 6/18 [ 6/18 119 Excavate 6/22 B 6/23 120 Install Sewer Piping 6/24 | 6/25 121 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Risers 6/25 Efl 6/29 122 Backfill Lifts 6/30 a 7/1 123 Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 7/2 [JJ 7/6 124 West Truck Lane -1,100 If 8/23 ^^^ 9/17 125 Survey 8/23 [ 8/23 126 Excavate 8/24 FFFfl 9/2 ^^^^^=^=^^=^^====^==^_^^^^^^^^^^^^ == |
Page 3
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B iD [Task Name I I 2Q10 I ~ 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 10.11 I 2Q11 Mar Apr I May I Jun Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct Nov Dec I Jan I Feb Mar I Apr I May J___127 Install Sewer Piping 8/26 rrm 9/7 128 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Risers 9/7 g 9/9 129 Backfill Lifts 9/8 EH 9/15 130 Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 9/16 | 9/17 131 East / South East Parking 300 If 6/30 f^~^^» 7/26 132 Survey 6/30 ] 6/30 133 Excavate 7/9 |g 7/12 134 Install Sewer Piping 7/13 j] 7/14 135 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Risers 7/14 FJ 7/16 136 Backfill Lifts 7/21 g 7/22 137 Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 7/23 g 7/26 138 Firewater 5/13 ^^^ ^^m"^^^^^~i^^^ 9/16 139 North Truck Court-Col 17 thru 33 5/13^^5/28 140 Survey 5/13 I 5/13 141 Excavate 5/14 pa 5/19 142 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devio 5/17 [f] 5/20 143 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 5/18 0 5/21 144 Load and Test System 5/24 ] 5/25 145 Backfill 5/25 g 5/27 146 Install Above Grade Devices 5/27 J 5/28 147 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 5/20 ^^^^^ 6/16 148 Survey 5/20 J 5/20 149 Excavate 5/21 Q 5/26 150 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devio 5/27 Hffl 6/8 151 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 5/28 (TTn 6/9 152 Load and Test System 6/10 0 6/11 153 Backfill 6/11 E 6/15 154 Install Above Grade Devices 6/15 | 6/16 ~T55~~ East Truck Lane 5/17 ^^^^^ 6/16 156 Survey 5/17 fj 5/17 157 Excavate 5/18 g 5/21 158 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devic 5/27 mm 6/8 159 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 5/28 FFFH 6/9 160 Load and Test System 6/10 g 6/11 161 Backfill 6/11 EH 6/15 162 Install Above Grade Devices 6/15 | 6/16 163 South Truck Court-Col 17 thru 30 5/14 ^^^^^ 6/10 164 Survey 5/14 | 5/14 165 Excavate 5/17 ffl 5/20 166 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devic 5/21 EB 5/26 167 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 5/24 g 5/27 168 Load and Test System 5/28 FFFfl 6/7 ^^^^=^^^^^^^^^^^ |
Page 4
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS iD [Task Name I I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 Mar I Apr I May Jun Jul I Aug I Sen Oct Nov I Dec i Jan Feb I Mar I Apr May I J 169 Backfill 6/7 rj 6/9 170 Install Above Grade Devices 6/9 fj 6/10 171 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 8/5 ^-^^ 8/23 172 Survey 8/5 ] 8/5 173 Excavate 8/6 EH 8/11 174 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devic 8/9 fl] 8/12 175 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 8/10 0 8/13 176 Load and Test System 8/16 | 8/17 177 Backfill 8/17 g 8/20 178 Install Above Grade Devices 8/20 a 8/23 179 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 8/6 ^^^ 8/27 180 Survey 8/6 ( 8/6 181 Excavate 8/12 [Q 8/17 182 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devic 8/13 Q 8/18 183 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 8/16 p 8/19 184 Load and Test System 8/20 a 8/23 185 Backfill 8/23 a 8/26 186 Install Above Grade Devices 8/26 fl 8/27 187 West Truck Lane 8/9 ^^^ 9/7 188 Survey 8/9 | 8/9 189 Excavate 8/18 pa 8/23 190 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devic 8/19 H 8/24 191 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 8/20 H 8/25 192 Load and Test System 8/26 g 8/27 193 Backfill 8/27 Effl 9/3 194 Install Above Grade Devices 9/3 B 9/7 195 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 5/18 ^^^^^"^ 6/23 196 Survey 5/18 ( 5/18 197 Excavate 5/19 ffi 5/24 198 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devic 6/9 Efl 6/14 199 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 6/10 EH 6/15 200 Load and Test System 6/16 p 6/17 201 Backfill 6/17 EFJ 6/22 202 Install Above Grade Devices 6/22 g 6/23 203 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 9/8 EB 9/14 204 Complete Point of Connection / Active Service 9/15 g 9/16 205 Pump House Equipment 6/16 ^^^^^^^^^^^ 8/5 206 Pump House Structure In Place ? 6/16 207 Install Pump House Equipment 6/17 7/8 208 Electrical System Installation 7/9 FFffl 7/22 209 Fueling and Testing 7/23 DJTJ 8/5 210 Domestic Water 7/2 ^^^^^^"^^ 8/16 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^:^==^==^^=^^^^= |
Page 5
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID iTask Name I 2Q10 3Q10 | 4Q10 I 1Q11 [ 2Q11 Mar f Apr May Jun Jul Auq Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar [ Apr ~ May J___211 South Truck Court (West End) 380 If 7/2 ^^^^ 7/23 212 Survey 7/2 j 7/2 213 Excavate 7/6 g 7/7 214 Prepare Point of Connection 7/8(7/8 215 Install Water Piping 7/9 £] 7/12 216 Backfill 7/13 | 7/13 217 Install Above Grade Devices 7/13 | 7/14 218 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 7/15 p 7/21 219 Complete Point of Connection / Active Service 7/22 j 7/23 220 East / South East Parking 310 If 7/27 ^^"^ 8/16 221 Survey 7/27 I 7/27 222 Excavate 7/28 (J 7/29 223 Prepare Point of Connection 7/30 | 7/30 224 Install Water Piping 8/2 g 8/3 225 Backfill 8/4 I 8/4 226 Install Above Grade Devices 8/4 fj 8/5 227 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 8/6 fg 8/12 228 Complete Point of Connection / Active Service 8/13 O 8/16 229 Dock Ramp and Stairs 7/2 ^^^^^^"^^^^^^^^^^ 10/5 230 Dock Ramp and Stair Panels (Cast on Wall Panels) 7/2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^ 10/1 231 Column Line A-17 thru 33-(18 Panels) 7/2 V^^ 7/19 232 Layout and Snap Lines 7/2 g 7/2 233 ~ Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/2 ffl 7/6 234 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 7/7 | 7/7 235 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel / Lift Steel 7/7 0 7/8 ~~236 Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/9 | 7/9 237 Place and Finish Panel 7/12 0 7/12 238 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/13 [33 7/19 239 Strip Formwork and Clean 7/16 17/16 240 Column Line N -17 thru 33 (22 Panels) 7/12 ^^^ 7/26 241 Layout and Snap Lines 7/12 ] 7/12 242 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/12 p 7/13 243 Install Down Feature Element/Side Embeds 7/14 I 7/14 244 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel / Lift Steel 7/14 p 7/15 245 Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/16(7/16 246 Place and Finish Panel 7/19 ] 7/19 247 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/20 fjg 7/26 248 Strip Formwork and Clean 7/23 | 7/23 249 Column Line A 33 thru 49 (20 Panels) 8/3 ^^^ 8/17 250 Layout and Snap Lines 8/3 I 8/3 251 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 8/3 g 8/4 252 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 8/5 [ 8/5 |
Page 6
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID [Task Name I 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 ~ 2Q11 Mar f Apr May Jun Jul I Auq ~ Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___253 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7 Lift Steel 8/5 p 8/6 254 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/9 g 8/9 255 Place and Finish Panel 8/10 I 8/10 256 Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/11 Eg 8/17 257 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/16 g 8/16 258 Column Line N 33 thru 49 (14 Panels) 8/10 ^^ 8/24 259 Layout and Snap Lines 8/10)8/10 260 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 8/10 | 8/11 261 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 8/12 J 8/12 262 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel / Lift Steel 8/12 g 8/13 263 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/16 | 8/16 264 Place and Finish Panel 8/17 j 8/17 265 Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/18 n 8/24 266 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/23 1 8/23 267 Column Line A -1 thru 17 (20 Panels) 9/2 ^-^ 9/17 268 Layout and Snap Lines 9/2 1 9/2 269 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/2 fj 9/3 270 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 9/7 | 9/7 271 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel / Lift Steel 9/7 g 9/8 272 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/9 g 9/9 273 Place and Finish Panel 9/10 J 9/10 274 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/13 Q 9/17 275 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/16(9/16 276 Column Line N -1 thru 17 (22 Panels) 9/17 ^-^ 10/1 277 Layout and Snap Lines 9/17 g 9/17 278 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/17 a 9/20 279 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 9/21 l 9/21 280 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel / Lift Steel 9/21 g 9/22 281 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/23 | 9/23 282 Place and Finish Panel 9/24 | 9/24 283 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/27 gg 10/1 284 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/30 [ 9/30 285 Ramp Wall and Stair Foundations 7/2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 9/29 286 Column Line A -17 thru 33 7/2 ^^^ 7/15 287 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 7/2 g 7/2 288 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 7/2 g 7/2 289 Install Rebar 7/6 ( 7/6 290 Install Embeds 7/6 J 7/6 291 Place Foundations 7/7 ] 7/7 292 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/8 g 7/8 293 Install Erection Pads 7/8 1 7/8 294 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/9 f£B 7/15 |
Page 7
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID [Task Name 2Q10 I 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 Mar Apr I May I Jun Jul I Auq Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May I J 295 Column Line N -17 thru 33 7/12 ^^ 7/22 296 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 7/12 J 7/12 297 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 7/12 j 7/12 298 Install Rebar 7/13 | 7/13 299 Install Embeds 7/13 | 7/13 300 Place Foundations 7/14 I 7/14 301 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/15 I 7/15 302 Install Erection Pads 7/15 0 7/15 303 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/16 EH 7/22 304 Column Line A 33 thru 49 8/3 ^"^ 8/13 305 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/3 I 8/3 306 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/3 1 8/3 307 Install Rebar 8/4 | 8/4 308 Install Embeds 8/4 | 8/4 309 Place Foundations 8/5 I 8/5 310 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/6 8 8/6 311 Install Erection Pads 8/6 g 8/6 312 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/9 Q3 8/13 313 Column Line N 33 thru 49 8/10 »-^> 8/20 314 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/10 ] 8/10 315 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/10 | 8/10 316 Install Rebar 8/11 B 8/11 317 Install Embeds 8/11 fj 8/11 318 Place Foundations 8/12 j 8/12 319 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/13 I 8/13 320 Install Erection Pads 8/13 I 8/13 321 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/16 Q 8/20 322 Column Line A-1 thru 17 9/2 ^^^ 9/15 323 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 9/2 I 9/2 324 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 9/2 I 9/2 325 Install Rebar 9/3 1 9/3 326 Install Embeds 9/3 1 9/3 327 Place Foundations 9/7 | 9/7 328 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 9/8 I 9/8 329 Install Erection Pads 9/8 fj 9/8 330 Cure Time Prior to Loading 9/9939/15 331 Column Line N -1 thru 17 9/17 ^^ 9/29 332 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 9/17 1 9/17 333 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 9/17 g 9/17 334 Install Rebar 9/20 I 9/20 335 Install Embeds 9/20 [ 9/20 336 Place Foundations 9/21 | 9/21 |
Page 8
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Auq Sep Pel Nov I Dec Jan I Feb Mar Apr May J___337 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 9/22 | 9/22 338 Install Erection Pads 9/22 J 9/22 339 Cure Time Prior to Loading 9/23 Eg 9/29 340 Erect Ramp Walls (Lift with Building) 7/23 Jj^^^^^^ 9/30 341 Column Line N -17 thru 33 + 7/23 342 Column Line A 33 thru 49 + 8/20 343 Column Line A -1 thru 17 + 9/29 344 Column Line N -1 thru 17 + 9/30 345 Erect Stair Walls / Brace / Place Locking Footing 7/20 ^^"^^^^^"^^"^"^ 10/5 346 Column Line A -17 thru 33 (18 Panels) 7/20 g 7/22 347 Column Line N -17 thru 33 (16 Panels) 7/26 B 7/28 348 Column Line A 33 thru 49 (14 Panels) 8/20 g] 8/24 349 Column Line N 33 thru 49 (14 Panels) 8/24 Q 8/26 350 Column Line A -1 thru 17 (14 Panels) 9/29 FJ 10/1 351 Column Line N -1 thru 17 (16 Panels) 10/1 H 10/5 352 Truck Court Concrete Paving 7/23 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 10/13 353 Column Line A -17 thru 33 (+/-56,000 sf) 7/23 ^W 7/29 354 Fine Grade and Prep 7/23 O 7/26 355 Place and Finish Concrete 7/27 a 7/29 356 Column Line N -17 thru 30 - (+/-42,000 sf) 7/29 ^» 8/4 357 Fine Grade and Prep 7/29 F, 7/30 358 Place and Finish Concrete 8/2 g 8/4 359 Truck Court Paving In Place for Conveyance Vendor ? 8/4 360 Column Line A 33 thru 45 - (+/-44.000 sf) 8/25 T-v 9/2 361 Fine Grade and Prep 8/25 a 8/26 362 Place and Finish Concrete 8/27 B3 9/2 363 ColumnLineA-3thru17-(+/-46,000sf) 10/4^10/8 364 Fine Grade and Prep 10/4 a 10/5 365 Place and Finish Concrete 10/6 g 10/8 366 Column Line N 3 thru 17 (+/-46.000 sf) 10/6 V^ 10/13 367 Fine Grade and Prep 10/6 0 10/7 368 Place and Finish Concrete 10/11 n 10/13 369 Site Screen Walls / Trash Enclosures / Pump House Walls 6/28 ^""^i^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 10/20 370 Foundations 6/28 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^i 9/10 371 NE Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Building 7/21 ^^^ 8/2 372 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 7/21 I 7/21 373 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 7/21 I 7/21 374 Install Rebar 7/22 J 7/22 375 Install Embeds 7/22 | 7/22 376 Place Foundations 7/23 ] 7/23 377 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/26 | 7/26 378 Install Erection Pads 7/26 | 7/26 ^==^^=^^^^^^==^==^==^^=^ =^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^= |
Page 9
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID [Task Name I I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 2Q11 Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul I Auq I Sep Pel I Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I May I J___379 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/27 n 8/2 380 NW Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Buildin 8/18 ^^ 8/30 381 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/18 p 8/18 382 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/18 j 8/18 383 Install Rebar 8/19 I 8/19 384 Install Embeds 8/19 | 8/19 385 Place Foundations 8/20 | 8/20 386 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/23 [ 8/23 387 Install Erection Pads 8/23 I 8/23 388 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/24 EH 8/30 389 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen (Lift v 6/28 ^ ^ 7/9 390 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 6/28 | 6/28 391 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 6/28 | 6/28 392 Install Rebar 6/29 8 6/29 393 Install Embeds 6/29 g 6/29 394 Place Foundations 6/30 ] 6/30 395 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 7/1 | 7/1 396 Install Erection Pads 7/1 | 7/1 397 Cure Time Prior to Loading 7/2 g=g 7/9 398 Southern Truck Court Group #1 8/19 ^^^ 9/2 399 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/19 ] 8/19 400 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/19 J 8/19 401 Install Rebar 8/20 | 8/20 ~~402~ Install Embeds 8/20 J 8/20 403 Place Foundations 8/23 I 8/23 404 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/24 J 8/24 405 Install Erection Pads 8/24 J 8/24 406 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/25 (ga 9/2 407 Southern Truck Court Group #2 8/20 «bb^ 9/3 408 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/20 | 8/20 ~~409- Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/20 I 8/20 410 Install Rebar 8/23 j 8/23 411 Install Embeds 8/23 I 8/23 412 Place Foundations 8/24 0 8/24 ~ 413 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/25 J 8/25 414 Install Erection Pads 8/25 g 8/25 415 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/26 EBB 9/3 ~ 416 Southern Truck Court Group #3 8/23 v*^^ 9/7 417 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/23 | 8/23 418 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/23(8/23 419 Install Rebar 8/24 g 8/24 420 Install Embeds 8/24 g 8/24 |
Page 10
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID [Task Name I I 2Q10 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 Mar I Apr May T Jun Jul I Auq I Sep Oct I Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar Apr I May J___421 Place Foundations 8/25 | 8/25 422 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/26 | 8/26 423 Install Erection Pads 8/26 I 8/26 424 Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/27 ITffl 9/7 425 Southern Truck Court Group #4 8/24 ^^ 9/8 426 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/24 J 8/24 427 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/24 J 8/24 428 Install Rebar 8/25 [ 8/25 429 Install Embeds 8/25 j 8/25 430 Place Foundations 8/26 1 8/26 431 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/27 1 8/27 432 Install Erection Pads 8/27 | 8/27 433~ Cure Time Prior to Loading 8/30 [mi 9/8 434 Southern Truck Court Group #5 8/25 ^^^ 9/9 435 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/25 0 8/25 436 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/25 [ 8/25 437 Install Rebar 8/26 | 8/26 438 Install Embeds 8/26 I 8/26 439 Place Foundations 8/27 J 8/27 440 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 8/30 ] 8/30 441 Install Erection Pads 8/30 B 8/30 442 Cure Time Prior to Loading 9/2 E| 9/9 443 East Parking Internal Security Screen 8/26^^^9/10 444 Layout and Excavate Setting Pads 8/26 | 8/26 445 Receive, Inventory and Store Anchor Bolt Asser 8/26 | 8/26 446 Install Rebar 8/27 I 8/27 447 Install Embeds 8/27 [ 8/27 448 Place Foundations 8/30 J 8/30 449 Strip Forms and Clean Embeds 9/2 1 9/2 450 Install Erection Pads 9/2 0 9/2 451 Cure Time Prior to Loading 9/3 H=H 9/10 452 Screen Wall Panels - Cast on Slab 7/12 ^^^^^^^"^^^^ 9/20 453 NE Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Buildinc 8/3^^^8/18 454 Layout and Snap Lines 8/3 1 8/3 455 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 8/3 g 8/4 456 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 8/5 I 8/5 457 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 8/5 ffl 8/9 458 Install Lift Steel 8/9 ] 8/9 459 Install Upside Panel Embeds 8/9 [ 8/9 460 Ring Panel / Panel Check 8/10)8/10 461 Place and Finish Panel 8/11 B 8/11 462 Cure Time Prior to Lift 8/12 rfrj 8/18 |
Page 11
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FA1RVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID iTask Name I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 ~ Mar Apr I May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb I Mar ~ Apr May J_ 463 Strip Formwork and Clean 8/17 g 8/17 464 Install Panel Braces 8/18 I 8/18 465 NW Truck Court internal Screen (Lift with Buildin 9/2 ^^"^ 9/20 466 Layout and Snap Lines 9/2 j 9/2 467 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/2 g 9/3 468 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 9/7 | 9/7 469 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 9/7 B 9/9 470 Install Lift Steel 9/9 | 9/9 471 Install Upside Panel Embeds 9/9 I 9/9 472 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/10 [J 9/10 473 Place and Finish Panel 9/13 J 9/13 474 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/14 EH 9/20 475 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/17 J 9/17 476 Install Panel Braces 9/20 1 9/20 477 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen (Lift v 7/12 ^^ 7/27 478 Layout and Snap Lines 7/12 a 7/12 479 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 7/12 g 7/13 ~~480 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 7/14 J 7/14 481 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 7/14 g 7/16 482 Install Lift Steel 7/16 [ 7/16 483 Install Upside Panel Embeds 7/16 g 7/16 iei~ Ring Panel / Panel Check 7/19 | 7/19 485 Place and Finish Panel 7/20 I 7/20 486 Cure Time Prior to Lift 7/21 gg 7/27 487 Strip Formwork and Clean 7/26 | 7/26 488 Install Panel Braces 7/27 | 7/27 489 Temporary Casting Slab 7/19 ^^^^^^^"^^^^^^^^ 10/18 490 Prepare Grade for Casting Slab 7/19 g 7/23 491 Place Casting Slab 7/26 g 7/28 492 Remove Casting Slab / Dead Men 10/14 H 10/18 493 Screen Wall Panels 9/3 ^^^^^^^ 10/12 494 Southern Truck Court 9/3 ^^^^^^ 10/7 495 Southern Truck Court Group #1 (+/- 30 Pan< 9/3 ^^V 9/21 496 Layout and Snap Lines 9/3 I 9/3 497 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/3 H 9/7 498 Install Down Feature Element / Side Ember 9/8 J 9/8 499 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 9/8 Q 9/10 500 Install Lift Steel 9/10 8 9/10 501 Install Upside Panel Embeds 9/10 g 9/10 502 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/13 I 9/13 503 Place and Finish Panel 9/14 g 9/14 504 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/15 fa 9/21 |
Page 12
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID Task Name ~ 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 Mar I Apr May Jun Jul Aug I Sep I Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr I May J___505 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/20 I 9/20 506 Install Panel Braces 9/21 I 9/21 507 Southern Truck Court - Group #2 (+/- 30 Pant 9/7 ^^^ 9/24 508 Layout and Snap Lines 9/7 | 9/7 509 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/8 g 9/9 510 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embei 9/10 ] 9/10 511 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 9/13 JJ 9/15 512 Install Lift Steel 9/15 ] 9/15 513 Install Upside Panel Embeds 9/15 g 9/15 514 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/16(9/16 515 Place and Finish Panel 9/17 I 9/17 516 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/20 Eg 9/24 517 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/23 | 9/23 518 Install Panel Braces 9/24 g 9/24 519 Southern Truck Court Group #3 (+/- 30 Pant 9/8 ^^^^ 9/29 520 Layout and Snap Lines 9/8 1 9/8 521 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/10 Q 9/13 ~~522 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embec 9/14 1 9/14 523 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 9/16 o 9/20 524 Install Lift Steel 9/20 [ 9/20 525 Install Upside Panel Embeds 9/20 1 9/20 ~526~ Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/21 I 9/21 527 Place and Finish Panel 9/22 I 9/22 528 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/23 ffl 9/29 529 Strip Formwork and Clean 9/28 I 9/28 530 Install Panel Braces 9/29 | 9/29 531 Southern Truck Court - Group #4 (+/-30 Pant 9/9 *^p 10/4 532 Layout and Snap Lines 9/9 g 9/9 533 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/14 g 9/15 534 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embec 9/16 I 9/16 535 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 9/21 g 9/23 536 Install Lift Steel 9/23 | 9/23 537 Install Upside Panel Embeds 9/23 | 9/23 538 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/24 | 9/24 539 Place and Finish Panel 9/27 | 9/27 540 Cure Time Prior to Lift 9/28 H 10/4 541 Strip Formwork and Clean 10/1110/1 542 Install Panel Braces 10/4 1 10/4 543 Southern Truck Court Group #5 (+/- 30 Pant 9/10 ^^^^^ 10/7 544 Layout and Snap Lines 9/10 19/10 545 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/16 g 9/17 546 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embec 9/20 | 9/20 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^_^^^^^^ |
Page 13
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID [Task Name I J 2Q10 I 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul I Aug ~ Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___547 Install Panel Reinforcing Steel 9/24 ETJ 9/28 548 Install Lift Steel 9/28 | 9/28 549 Install Upside Panel Embeds 9/28 ] 9/28 550 Ring Panel / Panel Check 9/29 | 9/29 551 Place and Finish Panel 9/30 J 9/30 552 Cure Time Prior to Lift 10/1 En 10/7 553 Strip Formwork and Clean 10/6 8 10/6 554 Install Panel Braces 10/7(10/7 -555 East Parking Internal Security Screen (+/-16 Para 9/13 ^"^^^^ 10/12 556 Layout and Snap Lines 9/13(9/13 557 Form Panels and Apply Bond Breaker 9/20 B 9/21 558 Install Down Feature Element / Side Embeds 9/22 | 9/22 559 Install Panel Reinforcing Steei 9/29 0 10/1 560 Install Lift Steel 10/1 [ 10/1 561 Install Upside Panel Embeds 10/1 ] 10/1 562 Ring Panel / Panel Check 10/4 j 10/4 563 Place and Finish Panel 10/5 |] 10/5 564 Cure Time Prior to Lift 10/6 QQ| 10/12 565~~ Strip Formwork and Clean 10/11 J 10/11 ~56£T Install Panel Braces 10/12 [ 10/12 567 Panel Erection 7/28 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^i 10/13 568 Crane Delivery and Assembly 8/12 g 8/13 569 Crane Access / Travel Prepared 8/16 jj 8/17 570 Erect Panels 7/28 ^-^^^^^^^^^^ 10/13 571 NE Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Buildin 8/19 0 8/19 572 NW Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Buildir 9/28 8 9/28 573 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen (Lift 7/28 I 7/28 574 Southern Truck Court 9/22^^^^10/11 575 Panel Group #1 (+/-30 Panels) 9/22 g 9/23 576~ Panel Group #2 (+/-30 Panels) 9/27 fl 9/28 ~HfT~ Panel Group #3 (+/-30 Panels) 9/30 0 10/1 578 Panel Group #4 (+/-30 Panels) 10/5 n 10/6 579 Panel Group #5 (+/-30 Panels) 10/8^10/11 580 East Parking Internal Security Screen (+/-16 Pa 10/13 J 10/13 581 Plumb, Line and Brace 7/29 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 10/15 582 NE Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Building) 8/20 g 8/23 583 NW Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Building) 9/29 J 9/30 584 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen (Lift with 7/29 Q 7/30 585 Southern Truck Court 9/24^^^^10/13 586 Panel Group #1 (+/-30 Panels) 9/24 a 9/27 ~~587~ Panel Group #2 (+/-30 Panels) 9/29 E 9/30 588 Panel Group #3 (+/-30 Panels) 10/4 g 10/5 |
Page 14
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID iTask Name 2Q10 I 3Q10 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 ~ Mar I Apr ~ May I Jun I Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov Dec I Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___589 Panel Group #4 (+/-30 Panels) 10/7 rj 10/8 ~590 Panel Group #5 (+/-30 Panels) 10/12 0 10/13 591 East Parking Internal Security Screen (+/-16 Panels; 10/14 { 10/15 592 Place Footings / Lock-in Panels / Remove Braces 8/2 ^^^"^^"^^^^^"^^ 10/20 593 NE Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Building) 8/24 [ 8/24 594 NW Truck Court Internal Screen (Lift with Building) 10/1 ] 10/1 ~595 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen (Lift with 8/2 I 8/2 596~ Southern Truck Court 9/28^^^^10/18 597 Panel Group #1 (+/-30 Panels) 9/28 a 9/30 ~598 Panel Group #2 (+/-30 Panels) 10/1 g 1015 ~599 Panel Group #3 (+/-30 Panels) 10/6 g 10/8 600 Panel Group #4 (+/-30 Panels) 10/11(0 10/13 601 Panel Group #5 (+/-30 Panels) 10/14 Q 10/18 602 East Parking Internal Security Screen (+/-16 Panels; 10/19 g 10/20 603 Site Hardscape 8/3 V^~^^^^^"^^^^^^^~^^^^^^^^V 1/17 ~604 Curb Grade 8/3 ^-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 12/23 605 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 8/3 a 8/4 606 ~ North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 9/8 ? 9/10 607 East Truck Lane 9/27 g 9/28 608 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 10/13 g 10/14 609 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 10/29 Q 11/1 610 South West Truck Court-Col 1 thru 17 12/21 ffl 12/23 611 West Truck Lane 11/2 g 11/3 612 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 11/18 ? 11/24 613 Site Concrete Curb, Gutter, Flowlines and Aprons 8/5 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^"¦"¦^^V 12/30 614 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 8/5 EH 8/10 615 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 9/13 rfl 9/16 616 East Truck Lane 9/29 FJj 10/4 617 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 10/15 gg 10/20 ~618 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/2 B 11/5 619 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 12/27 [JJ 12/30 620 West Truck Lane 11/4 n 11/9 621 East/South East Parking-Col 30 thru 49 12/2 I I 12/13 ~622 Asphalt Paving 8/11 l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1/13 ~623 Fine Grade 8/11 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1/5 624 North Truck Court-Col 17 thru 33 8/11 g 8/13 ~625 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 9/17 a 9/21 ~626~ East Truck Lane 10/5 B 10/7 ~627 South Truck Court-Col 17 thru 30 10/21 Q] 10/25 ~628 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/8 B 11/10 629 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 1/3 B 1/5 630 West Truck Lane 11/11 fig 11/15 |
Page 15
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID [Task Name I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Auq Sep Oct Nov Pec Jan Feb Mar Apj; May J___631 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 12/14 ? 12/20 632 Base Paving 8/16 ^^^^^^i^^^^m^^^ 1/10 633 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 8/16 g 8/18 634 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 9/22 Q 9/24 635 East Truck Lane 10/8 0 10/12 636 South Truck Court-Col 17 thru 30 10/26 ffj 10/28 637 North West Truck Court-Col 1 thru 17 11/11 g 11/15 638 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 1/6 Q 1/10 639 West Truck Lane 11/16 a 11/18 640 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 12/21 m 12/28 641 Asphalt Paving 8/19 ^^^* 1/13 642 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 8/19 Q 8/23 643 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 9/27 Q 9/29 644 East Truck Lane 10/13 a 10/15 645 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 10/29 rg 11/2 646 North West Truck Court-Col 1 thru 17 11/16 a 11/18 647 South West Truck Court-Col 1 thru 17 1/11 g 1/13 648 West Truck Lane 11/19 ffl 11/23 ~649 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 12/29 EEB 1/5 650 Pavement Markings and Signage 8/24 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^^^^^^"^^ 1/17 651 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 8/24 g 8/25 652 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 9/30 g 10/1 653 East Truck Lane 10/18 f] 10/19 654 South Truck Court - Col 17 thru 30 11/3 g 11/4 655 North West Truck Court-Col 1 thru 17 11/19 Q] 11/22 656 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 1/14 ffl 1/17 657 West Truck Lane 11/24 CCD 12/2 658 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 1/6 EB 1/11 659 Site Finishes 8/3 ^^^^"^^^^^^^^^^ 10/26 660 Sack and Patch 8/3 ^^^^^^^^""^^ 10/21 661 NE Truck Court Internal Screen 8/25 1 8/25 662~ NW Truck Court Internal Screen 10/4 p 10/4 663 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen 8/3 | 8/3 664 Southern Truck Court 10/1^^^10/19 665 Panel Group #1 10/1 I 10/1 666 Panel Group #2 10/6 j 10/6 667 Panel Group #3 10/110 10/11 668 Panel Group #4 10/14(10/14 669 Panel Group#5 10/19 I 10/19 670 East Parking Internal Security Screen 10/21 | 10/21 671 Caulk Screen / Waterproof Site Walls 8/4 ^^^^^^^^^-^^^ 10/22 672 NE Truck Court Internal Screen 8/26 | 8/26 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^___^^^^^^_ |
Page 16
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 ~ 2Q11 Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul I Aug Sep Pel I Nov I Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J 673 NW Truck Court Internal Screen 10/5 | 10/5 674 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen 8/4(8/4 675 Southern Truck Court 10/4^^^10/20 676 Panel Group #1 10/4 [ 10/4 677 Panel Group #2 10/7 g 10/7 678 Panel Group #3 10/12(10/12 ~~679 Panel Group #4 10/15 I 10/15 680 Panel Group #5 10/20 J 10/20 6S1 East Parking Internal Security Screen 10/22 | 10/22 ~~682 Painting and Finish 8/5 ^^^^^^^^^^^ 10/26 683 NE Truck Court Internal Screen 8/27 | 8/27 684 NW Truck Court Internal Screen 10/6 j 10/6 685 South Truck Court Internal Security Screen 8/5 [ 8/5 686 Southern Truck Court 10/5 ^^"^p 10/22 ~~687 Panel Group #1 10/5 g 10/6 688 Panel Group #2 10/8 g 10/11 689 Panel Group #3 10/13 g 10/14 690 Panel Group #4 10/18 Q 10/19 691 Panel Group #5 10/21 B 10/22 692 East Parking Internal Security Screen 10/25 0 10/26 693 Flatwork and Landscape 9/30 ^^^^^~"^~^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2/16 694 Fountain / Pool 12/14 II I I I I I I I I I I I 11 11 m 2/9 695 Fine Grade Flatwork and Landscape 9/30 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^V 1/7 696 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 9/30 g 10/1 ~697 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/4 p 10/5 698 East Truck Lane 10/8 B 10/11 699 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 10/26 fl 10/27 700 North West Truck Court-Col 1 thru 17 11/11 ffl 11/12 701 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 1/6 | 1/7 702 West Truck Lane 11/16 Q 11/17 703 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 12/21 n 12/28 704 Ramps, Flatwork, Decorative Flatwork 10/4 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1/14 ~705~ North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 10/4 a 10/5 706 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/6 g 10/7 ^707~ East Truck Lane 10/12 g 10/13 ^708~ South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 10/28 pjffl 11/10 ^09^ North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/15 B 11/16 ~TkT~ South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 1/10 H 1/14 711 West Truck Lane 11/18 D 11/19 712 East/South East Parking-Col 30 thru 49 12/29 I I 1/12 713 Landscape and Irrigation 10/6 l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^"^ 2/16 714 Irrigation Rough-in 10/6 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^» 1/21 |
Page 17
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID [Task Name FZZ 2Q10 I 3Q10 ~ 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul I Aua ~~ Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J_ 715 North Truck Court-Col 17 thru 33 10/6 g 10/7 716 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/8 Fj 10/11 717 East Truck Lane 10/14 gg 10/15 718 South Truck Court-Col 17 thru 30 11/11 gg 11/12 719 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/17 FJ 11/18 720 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 1/17 E 1/21 721 West Truck Lane 11/22 g 11/23 722 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 1/13 ? 1/19 723 ~ Install Heads and Trim 10/8 ^^"""^^^^^^^^^^ 1/26 724 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 10/8 Q 10/11 725 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/12 fl 10/13 726 East Truck Lane 10/18 g 10/19 727 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 1/24 a 1/25 728 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/19 FJ 11/22 729 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/23 rmn 12/6 730 West Truck Lane 11/24 FFFI 12/2 731 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 1/20 ? 1/26 732 Finish and Adjust 10/12 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^ 2/2 733 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 10/12 g 10/13 734 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/14 rj 10/15 735 East Truck Lane 10/20 FJ 10/21 736 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 1 /26 g 1 /27 737 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/23 a 11/24 738 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 12/2 H 12/8 739 West Truck Lane 12/9 I 12/10 740 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 1/27 EBB 2/2 741 Prep and Plant Trees 10/12 ^^^"^"^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2/2 742 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 10/12 g 10/13 743 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/14 gg 10/15 744 East Truck Lane 10/20 fj 10/21 745 South Truck Court - Col 17 thru 30 1/26 g 1/27 746 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 11/23 Q 11/24 747 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 12/7 EH 12/13 748 West Truck Lane 12/14 g 12/15 749 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 1/27 n 2/2 750 Prep and Plant Shrubs 10/14 ^^^^"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2/9 751 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 10/14 | 10/15 752 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/18 g 10/19 753 East Truck Lane 10/22 [D 10/25 754 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 1/28 FJ 1/31 755 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 12/2 g 12/3 756 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 12/14 fg 12/20 |
Page 18
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID jTask Name ~~ 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 , Mar Apr May Jun Jul Auq Sep Ocl Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___757 West Truck Lane 12/210 12/22 758 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 2/3 ? 2/9 759 Prep and Plant Ground Cover 10/18 ^¦^^^^^^¦^^^¦^^^¦^^"^^^ 2/16 760 North Truck Court Col 17 thru 33 10/18 [j 10/19 761 North East Truck Court Col 33 thru 49 10/20 j] 10/21 762 East Truck Lane 10/26 g 10/27 763 South Truck Court Col 17 thru 30 2/1 0 2/2 764 North West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 12/6 gj 12/7 765 South West Truck Court Col 1 thru 17 12/21 |g3 12/28 766 West Truck Lane 12/29 g 12/30 767 East / South East Parking Col 30 thru 49 2/10 ? 2/16 768 769 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS 5/5 ^^^^~^^^^^"^^^^^^^"^-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 3/16 770 PRIMARY WATER SERVICE 5/5 ^^^^"^^"^^^i^^^^^^ 9/29 771 Highland Blvd 750 If 6/11^^-^^7/16 772 Traffic Control Measures 6/11 g 6/11 773 Survey 6/14 I 6/14 774 Excavate 6/15 |J 6/17 775 Prepare Point of Connection 6/17(6/17 776 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devices 6/17 [JJ 6/23 777 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 6/24 Q 6/28 778 Prepare Point of Connection 6/29 J 6/29 779 Load and Test System 6/30 fj 7/1 ~^78<r~ Backfill 7/1 gg 7/6 781 Install Above Grade Devices 7/6 g 7/7 782 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 7/8 gg 7/14 783 Complete Point of Connection / Active Service 7/15 0 7/16 784 Sinclair Street and State Route 60 Crossing 5/5 ^^^^^^^^^^"^"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 9/24 ^rei!- Survey 6/15 g 6/15 786 Prepare Access Roadway Bed 6/16 EB 6/22 787 Install 3 Class II Base Access Roadway 9/20 gj 9/24 788 Sinclair Street 2,500 If 6/16 ^^^^^^ 7/27 789 Traffic Control Measures 6/16 16/16 790 Survey 6/17 g 6/17 791 Excavate 6/18 FFFfl 6/29 792 Prepare Point of Connection 6/21 J 6/21 793 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devio 6/24 inm 7/6 794 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 7/7 g 7/9 795 Load and Test System 7/12 Q 7/13 796 Backfill 7/13 Egg 7/22 797 Install Above Grade Devices 7/23 Efl 7/27 798 Caltrans Permits In Place ? 5/5 |
Page 19
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID |Task Name 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 10.11 I 2Q11 Mar I Apr I May I Jun i Jul I Auq Sep Oct Nov I Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I May J___799 State Route GO Crossing 350 If 8/6 ^^^^"^^ 9/13 800 On-site Box Storm Drain Completed and Backfil 4 8/12 801 Excavate Jack / Bore / Receiving Pit(s) 8/13 Q 8/16 802 Temporary Controls / Measures in Place + 8/6 803 Jack and Bore 24 Steel Casing 8/17 gg 8/23 804 Install Water System Piping 8/24 ETJ 8/30 805 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 9/2 g 9/3 806 Load and Test System 9/7 [ 9/8 807 Backfill 9/8 FJ 9/10 808 Point of Connection to Above Grade Devices 9/10 Q 9/13 809 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 9/13 Q 9/17 810 Complete Point of Connection/Active Service ? 9/17 811 Along North and East Property Line 3,200 If 8/12 ^b^b^ 9/29 812 North Property Line Retaining Wall In Place + 8/12 813 Survey 8/13 [ 8/13 814 Excavate 8/16 II I I I I II 9/2 815 Prepare Point of Connection 8/17 a 8/17 816 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and Devices 8/17 11 11 III 9/3 817 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 8/19 II I I I I FH 9/8 818 Load and Test System 8/27 gnn 9/10 819 Backfill 8/30 11 I I I I II 9/17 820 Install Above Grade Devices 9/17 g 9/20 821 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 9/21 03) 9/27 822 Complete Point of Connection / Active Service 9/28 a 9/29 823 824 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS in REDLANDS BLVD 7/12 ^^^^^^^^¦¦¦^^^^^^^^^^¦^ 12/3 825 Traffic Control Installed 7/12 a 7/13 826 Survey 7/14 Q 7/15 827 Rough Grade 7/16 ^^^ 7/29 828 Establish Erosion Control Measures 7/16 J3 7/19 829 Rough Grade 7/20 Ffl 7/26 830 Rough Finish Roadway / Temporary Ditch 7/27 g 7/29 83f~ Sewer Main Installation 4,700 If 7/30 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^""^^^^ 12/3 832 Station 157+63 to Station 159+40 7/30 H3 8/6 833 Station 159+40 to Station 164+38 8/9 H 8/13 834 Station 164+38 to Station 168+80 8/16 Q 8/23 835 Station 168+80 to Station 173+20 8/24 [H 8/30 836 Station 173+20 to Station 177+58 9/2 mq 9/10 837 Station 177+58 to Station 181+80 9/13 Q 9/17 838 Station 181+80 to Station 186+20 9/20 FfJ 9/27 839 Station 186+20 to Station 190+78 9/28 H3 10/4 840 Station 190+78 to Station 195+20 10/5 B3 10/12 |
Page 20
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID Task Name ^^^ 2Q10 I 3Q10 4Q10 I 1Q11 ~T 2Q11 Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov 1 Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I May ___| J 841 Station 195+20 to Station 199+60 10/13 ID 10/19 842~ Station 199+60 to Station 204+80 10/20 [FR 10/27 843 Final Sewer Inspection and Approvals 10/28 g 10/29 844 Point of Connection In Place 4 10/29 845 Finish Grade and Hardscape 11/1 ^^^"^ 12/3 846 Finish Grade and Profile Ditch 11/1 fj 11/3 847 Concrete V Ditch and Headwall Structures 11/4 jFfFFI 11/17 848 Box Culverts 11/4 nTm 11/17 849 Final Pavement Patch 11/18 Eg 11/24 850 Pavement Marking Repairs 12/2 g 12/3 851 852 EUCALYPTUS AVE. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 6/16 ^^^^^^^^^-^^^m^^^-^^^^^^^-^^^^^^^m^* 3/16 853 Rough Grade Roadway 6/24 ^"^^ 7/15 854 Station 10 thru 25 6/24 ? 6/30 855 Station 25 thru 45 7/1 ga 7/8 856 Station 45 thru 62 7/9 H 7/15 857 Utilities 6/16 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1/7 858 Box Culvert Line F Completed Across Roadway ? 6/16 859 Sewer with Manholes 7/1 ^^^^^^^^^~*»i 9/7 860 Station 10 thru 27-1,700 If 7/1 ^h^hb^ji 8/3 861 Survey 7/1 | 7/1 862 Excavate 7/2 ? 7/8 863 Install Sewer Main and Laterals 7/6 I I 7/20 864 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Ri 7/20 B 7/21 865 Backfill Lifts 7/22 EH 7/27 866 Continue Manholes and Clean-outs 10to 2 7/28 a 7/29 867 Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 7/29 0 7/30 868 Backfill Lifts 8/2 g 8/3 869 Station 27 thru 45-1,800 If 7/9 |^^^^^^^ 8/18 870 Survey 7/9 I 7/9 871 Excavate 7/12 gg 7/15 872 Install Sewer Main and Laterals 7/21 I I 8/4 873 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Ri 8/4 rj 8/5 874 Backfill Lifts 8/6 ? 8/11 875 Continue Manholes and Clean-outs 10 to 2 8/12 0 8/13 ~~876~ Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 8/13 n 8/16 877 Backfill Lifts 8/17 Q 8/18 ~~87B~ Station 45 thru 58 -1,300 If 7/16 ^^^^^^""^ 9/7 879 Survey 7/16 I 7/16 880 Excavate 7/19 rfl 7/22 881 Install Sewer Main and Laterals 8/5 11 I I I I 8/19 882 Install Manholes Bottoms and Clean Out Ri 8/19 a 8/20 |
Page 21
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID [Task Name I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 Mar I Apr I May Jun I Jul I Aua ~ Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr I May I J 883 Backfill Lifts 8/23 ? 8/26 884 Continue Manholes and Clean-outs 10 to 2 8/27 ED 8/30 885 Top Out Manholes and Clean-outs 8/30 g 9/2 886 Backfill Lifts 9/3 H 9/7 887 Storm Drain 8/19 ^~^^*» 10/22 888 Lateral F-9 Station 26 thru 12 -1,400 If 9/9 <^^""^^ 10/14 889 Survey 9/9 | 9/9 890 ~ Excavate 9/21 a 9/24 891 Install Storm Drain Piping 9/30 ? 10/7 892 Install Structures 10/8 Q 10/12 893 Backfill 10/11 B 10/14 894 Laterals F-9A thru F-9D 9/10 ^^^^^^^ 10/22 895 Survey 9/10 [ 9/10 896 Excavate 9/27 a 9/30 897 Install Storm Drain Piping 10/8 ? 10/15 898 Install Structures 10/18 Q 10/20 899 Backfill 10/19 Q 10/22 900 Lateral F-8 Station 26 thru 45 -1,900 If 8/19 ^^^^ 9/10 901 Survey 8/19 0 8/19 ~902~ Excavate 8/20 ? 8/25 903 Install Storm Drain Piping 8/24 CZ3 9/2 904 Install Structures 9/3 EH 9/8 905 Backfill 97 B 9/10 906 Laterals F-8C thru F-8H 8/20 ^^^ 9/20 907 Survey 8/20 | 8/20 908 Excavate 8/26 L^ 9/2 909 Install Storm Drain Piping 9/3 LZZ] 9/13 910 Install Structures 9/14 fj 9/16 911 Backfill 9/15 H 9/20 912 Lateral F-8 Station 45 thru 59 -1,400 9/8 H^^^^ 9/28 913 Survey 9/8 i 9/8 914 Excavate 9/9 Q 9/14 915 Install Storm Drain Piping 9/14 ? 9/21 916 Install Structures 9/22 [fl 9/24 917 Backfill 9/23 ffl 9/28 918 Laterals F-8I thru F-8P 9/9 ^^^^^ 10/6 919 Survey 9/9 I 9/9 920 Excavate 9/15 B 9/20 921 install Storm Drain Piping 9/22 ? 9/29 922 Install Structures 9/30 FJj 10/4 923 Backfill 10/1 EH 10/6 924 Domestic Water System 9/21 ^^^^^^^^^^^m^^^^^^i 12/28 |
Page 22
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBITS ID iTask Name I 2Q10 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___925 Station 59 thru 45-1,400 If 10/25 ^^^^ 12/7 926 Survey 10/25 I 10/25 927 Excavate 10/26 CD 113 928 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and C 10/29 CZ3 11/8 929 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 11/2 EH] 11/10 930 Load and Test System 11/9 g 11/12 ~~931 Backfill 11/9 EFfl 11/17 932 Install Above Grade Devices 11/17 pj 11/19 933 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 11/22 FFffl 12/3 934 Complete Point of Connection / Active Serv 12/6 J 12/7 ~935~ Station 45 thru 25 2,000 If 9/21 ^^^^^"^^ 11 /5 936 Survey 9/21 j 9/21 937 Excavate 9/22 mm 10/5 938 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and C 9/28 (FFFFI 10/11 ~939^ Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 10/4 PTJ 10/15 940 Load and Test System 10/12 FJJ 10/19 941 Backfill 10/12 fffflj 10/25 942 Install Above Grade Devices 10/25 a 1"/27 943 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 10/28 gg 11/3 944 Complete Point of Connection / Active Serv 11/4 Q 11/5 945 Station 25 thru 11 -1,400 If 10/27 |^^^^^^^^ 12/28 946 Survey 10/27 | 10/27 947 Excavate 11/15 CD 11/23 948 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and t 11/18 I I 12/3 949 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 11/22 n 111II 12/7 950 Load and Test System 12/3 H 12/9 951 Backfill 12/6 EQ 12/14 952 Install Above Grade Devices 12/14 a 12/16 953 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 12/17 ggj 12/23 954 Complete Point of Connection / Active Serv 12/27 g 12/28 955 Recycled Water System 9/22 ^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^^ 1/7 956 Station 59 thru 45 -1,400 If 10/26 ^^^^"^^^ 12/16 957 Survey 10/26 j 10/26 958 Excavate 11/4 ? 11/12 959 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and C 11/9 CD 11/17 960 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 11/11 fj-g 11/19 961 Load and Test System 11/18 ffl 11/23 962 Backfill 11/18 Ffl=m 12/3 963 Install Above Grade Devices 12/3 Q 12/7 964 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 12/8 ffB 12/14 965 Complete Point of Connection / Active Serv 12/15 | 12/16 966 Station 45 thru 25 2,000 If 9/22 ^^^^^^^^^^ 11/19 |
Page 23
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I, LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID jTask Name I I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 [ 2Q11 Mar I Apr May I Jun Jul Aug I Sep I Oct ~ Nov I Deo I Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I M~ay I J___967 Survey 9/22 1 9/22 968 Excavate 10/6 FFFFfl 10/19 969 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and [ 10/12 mm 10/25 970 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 10/18 mfB 10/29 971 Load and Test System 10/26 ggg 11/2 972 Backfill 10/26 fffTm 11/8 973 Install Above Grade Devices 11/8 E 11/10 974 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 11/11 Q3 11/17 975 Complete Point of Connection / Active Serv 11/18 Q 11/19 976 Station 25 thru 11 -1,400 If 10/28 ^^^^"^"^^^"^ 1/7 977 Survey 10/28 0 10/28 978 Excavate 11/24 I 1 12/9 979 Install Water System Piping, Laterals and C 12/6 ? 12/14 980 Install Thrust Blocks / Restraints 12/8 [ I 12/16 981 Load and Test System 12/14 n 12/20 982 Backfill 12/15 CD 12/23 983 Install Above Grade Devices 12/23 n 12/28 984 Charge, Test, Chlorinate and Inspect 12/29 I I 1/5 985 Complete Point of Connection/Active Serv 1/6 Q 1/7 986 Eucalyptus Ave Hardscape / Softscape Improvements WW ^^^^^^"^^^^^^^^^^^""^"^^V 3/16 987 Station 62 thru 45 12/17 ^^-^^^^^^^^ 2/28 988 Survey 12/17 gg 12/20 989 Curb Grade 12/20 fj 12/23 990 Site Concrete 12/27^^1/6 991 Street Curb and Spandrels 12/27 [CD 1/3 992 Drive Approaches 12/29 EH 1/3 993 Light Pole Bases 1/4 Q 1/6 ~994~ Paving 1/4 ^^"^ 124 ~995~ Fine Grade Street Paving 1/4 O 1/7 996 Base Coarse 1/1° B 1/12 997 Asphalt Paving 1/13 Efl 1/17 998 Adjust Covers to Grade and Patch 1/18 0 1/19 999 Pavement Markings and Signage 1/20 ES 1/24 1000 Dry Utility Systems 1/6 ^^^^^^^ 2/11 1001 Structures 1/6 H 1/10 1002 Primary Conduits and Pull Boxes 1/11 gg 1/14 1003 Street Lighting Conduits and Pull Boxes 1/17 ffl 1/20 1004 Install Street Lights 2/2 H 2/7 1005 Pull Conductors and Make Up Street Lights 2/8 rj 2/11 1006 Sidewalks and Landscape 12/27 ^^^^^^^^^^^ 2/24 1007 Fine Grade 1/21 B 1/26 1008 Flatwork and Ramps 1/27 fa 2/1 |
Page 24
J. D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID iTask Name 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May J___1009 Irrigation Sleeves 12/27 a 12/28 1010 Rough-in Irrigation 1/31 B 2/3 1011 Irrigation Heads and Trim 2/3 Q 2/8 1012- Test Irrigation System 2/8(5 2/11 1013 Plant Trees 2/14 g 2/16 1014 Plant Shrubs 2/16 Q 2^1 1015 Install Ground Cover 2/21 H 2/24 1016 Final Cleaning 2/25 p 2/28 1017 Station 45 thru 25 11/18 ^^^^"^^^^» 2/4 1018 Survey 11/18 g 11/19 1019 Curb Grade 11/19^11/24 1020 Site Concrete 12/2^^12/13 1021 Street Curb and Spandrels 12/2 mj 12/8 1022 Drive Approaches 12/6 B 12/8 1023 Light Pole Bases 12/9 Q 12/13 1024 Paving 12/9 ^"^ 12/30 1025 Fine Grade Street Paving 12/9 H 12/14 1026 Base Coarse 12/15 E 12/17 1027 Asphalt Paving 12/20 g 12/22 1028 Adjust Covers to Grade and Patch 12/23 n 12/27 1029 Pavement Markings and Signage 12/28 B 12/30 1030 Dry Utility Systems 12/13 ^"^^^^^ 1/20 1031 Structures 12/13 g 12/15 1032 Primary Conduits and Pull Boxes 12/16 E0 12/21 1033 Street Lighting Conduits and Pull Boxes 12/22 EQ 12/28 1034 Install Street Lights 1/11 H 1/14 ~1035 Pull Conductors and Make Up Street Lights 1/17 ffi 1/20 1036 Sidewalks and Landscape 12/2 ^^^^^^^^"^ 2/2 1037 Fine Grade 12/29 FB 1/4 1038 Flatwork and Ramps 1/5 B 1/10 1039 Irrigation Sleeves 12/2 a 12/3 1040 Rough-in Irrigation 1/7 CD 1/12 1041 Irrigation Heads and Trim 1/12 (Ffl 1/17 1042 Test Irrigation System 1/17 ED 1/20 1043 Plant Trees 1/21 H 1/25 1044 Plant Shrubs 1/25 g 1/28 1046 Install Ground Cover 1/28 BB 2/2 1046 Final Cleaning 2/3 |!) 2/4 1047 Station 25 thru 10 1/6 ^^^^^^^"^^^^ 3/16 ~T04lT Survey 1/s ? 1/7 1049 Curb Grade 1/7 ? 1/12 1050 Site Concrete 1/13 *^^ 1/24 |
Page 25
J. D. Diflenbaugh, Inc. HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK SITE PACKAGE for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW LOGISTICS I. LLC Revised January 18, 2010 PRELIMINARY BID SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B ID |Task Name I 2Q10 I 3Q10 I 4Q10 I 1Q11 I 2Q11 ~~ Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov I ~ Dec I Jan I Feb I Mar Apr I May I J 1051 Street Curb and Spandrels 1/13 ? 1/19 1052 Drive Approaches 1/17 0 1/19 1053 Light Pole Bases 1/20 ? 1/24 1054 Paving 1/20 ^"^^ 2/9 1055 Fine Grade Street Paving 1/20 g 1/25 1056 Base Coarse 1/26 Q 1/28 1057 Asphalt Paving 1/31 B 2/2 1058~~ Adjust Covers to Grade and Patch 2/3 Q 2/4 1059 Pavement Markings and Signage 2/7 Fj 2/9 1060 Dry Utility Systems 1/24 ^^m^m^ 3/1 1061 Structures 1/24 Q 1/26 1062 Primary Conduits and Pull Boxes 1/27 ? 2/1 1063 Street Lighting Conduits and Pull Boxes 2/2 ? 2/7 1064 Install Street Lights 2/18 H 2/23 1065 Pull Conductors and Make Up Street Lights 2/24 rg 3/1 1066 Sidewalks and Landscape 1/13 ^^^"^^^^^^ 3/14 1067 Fine Grade 2/8 Q 2/11 1068 Flatwork and Ramps 2/14 Q 2/17 1069 Irrigation Sleeves 1/13 B 1/14 1070 Rough-in Irrigation 2/16 ? 2/21 1071 Irrigation Heads and Trim 2/21 Q 2/24 1072 Test Irrigation System 2/24 ? 3/1 1073~ Plant Trees 3/2 ? 3/4 1074 Plant Shrubs 3/4 ? 3/9 1075 Install Ground Cover 3/9 ? 3/14 ~r076~ Final Cleaning 3/15 p 3/16 |
Page 26
BUILDING ARCHITECT | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
HPA, INC | ||||||||||
18831 Bardeen Avenue, Suite 100 | ||||||||||
Irvine, California 92612 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Yong Nam
|
||||||||||
Partner
|
||||||||||
Office:
|
949-863-1770 x 138 | E-Mail: yong@hparchs.com | X | |||||||
Fax:
|
949-863-0851 | |||||||||
Direct:
|
949-862-2118 |
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
KRAMER ENGINEERING, INC. | ||||||||||
3002 Dow Avenue , Suite 136 | ||||||||||
Tustin, California 92780 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
David Kramer
|
||||||||||
President / Structural Engineer | ||||||||||
Office:
|
714-838-6222 | E-Mail: info@kramerengineeringinc.com | X | |||||||
Fax:
|
714-838-2023 | |||||||||
Direct:
|
714-402-1292 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
John Whiteman | ||||||||||
Project Engineer | ||||||||||
Office:
|
714-838-6222 x 116 | E-Mail: johnw@kramerengineeringinc.com | X | |||||||
Fax:
|
714-838-2023 | |||||||||
Direct:
|
714-402-1292 |
CIVIL ENGINEER | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
RBF CONSULTING | ||||||||||
14725 Alton Parkway | ||||||||||
Irvine, California 92618-2027 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Patrick F. Revere | ||||||||||
Senior Associate / Project Manager | X | X | ||||||||
Office:
|
949-855-5716 | E-Mail: prevere@rbf.com | ||||||||
Fax:
|
949-472-8122 | |||||||||
Cell:
|
949-910-8807 |
DRY UTILITY CONSULTANT | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
BUTSKO, INC. | ||||||||||
74-130 Country Club Drive, Suite 102 | ||||||||||
Palm Desert, California 92260 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Eddie Pablos | ||||||||||
Senior Project Manager | X | X | ||||||||
Office:
|
760-601-3390 | E-Mail: epablos@butskoutility.com | ||||||||
Fax:
|
760-346-8518 | |||||||||
Cell:
|
LEED CERTIFICATION & COMMISSIONING | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
LPA, ARCHITECTS | ||||||||||
5161 California Avenue, Suite 100 | ||||||||||
Irvine, California 92617 |
GENERAL CONTRACTOR | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
Paul Richardson | X | X | X | |||||||
Project Manager | ||||||||||
Office:
|
909-351-6865 | E-Mail: prichardson@diffenbaugh.com | ||||||||
Fax:
|
951-351-6880 | |||||||||
Cell:
|
951-906-8077 |
Project:
Highland Fariview Corporate Park
Trade:
General Contractor
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
BLDG.
On-Site
Off-Site
Joe Hamilton, SR
X
X
X
General Superintendent
909-351-6865
E-Mail: jhamilton@diffenbaugh.com
951-351-6880
951-906-8365
Bob Sanchez
X
X
X
Senior Superintendent
909-351-6865
E-Mail: bsanchez@diffenbaugh.com
951-351-6880
951-377-7918
Joe Schlemmer
X
X
X
Site Superintendent
909-351-6865
E-Mail: jschlemmer@diffenbaugh.com
951-351-6880
951-906-8522
Shawn Lagana
X
X
X
Project engineer
909-351-6865
E-Mail: slagana@diffenbaugh.com
951-351-6880
951-906-8439
Paul Lindley
X
X
X
Warrantee & Safety Director
909-351-6865
E-Mail: plindley@diffenbaugh.com
951-351-6880
951-906-8354
CONCRETE
CONTRACTOR
BLDG.
On-Site
Off-Site
INLAND CONCRETE CONSTRUCTORS
6879 Airport Drive
Riverside, California 92504
Rob Fazio
X
X
COO / General Manager
951-351-7770
E-Mail: rfazio@inlandconcrete.net
951-351-7776
909-208-2459
CONCRETE CONTRACTOR | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
Adrian Cruz | X | X | ||||||||
Director of Field Operaations | ||||||||||
Office:
|
951-351-7770 | E-Mail: acruz@inlandconcrete.net | ||||||||
Fax:
|
951-351-7776 | |||||||||
Cell:
|
909-208-2519 |
DESIGN-BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
TBD
|
||||||||||
Electrical: | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Merclan Electric | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
, California 92260 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Office:
|
E-Mail: | X | X | X | ||||||
Fax:
|
||||||||||
Cell:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Mechanical: | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Blake Air Conditioning | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
, California 92260 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Office:
|
E-Mail: | X | X | X | ||||||
Fax:
|
||||||||||
Cell:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Plumbing: | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
A Good Plumbing | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
California 92260 | ||||||||||
Office:
|
E-Mail: | X | X | X | ||||||
Fax:
|
||||||||||
Cell:
|
DESIGN-BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS | BLDG. | On-Site | Off-Site | |||||||
Advance Fire Protection, Inc. | ||||||||||
615 South Oaks | ||||||||||
Ontario, California 91762 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Chris Holland | X | X | X | |||||||
General Manager | ||||||||||
Office:
|
909-460-2510 | E-Mail: cholland@advancofire.com | ||||||||
Fax:
|
909-460-2513 | |||||||||
Cell:
|
909-560-6187 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
Josh Huber | X | X | X | |||||||
Project Engineer | ||||||||||
Office:
|
909-460-2510 | E-Mail: jhuber@advancofire.com | ||||||||
Fax:
|
909-460-2513 | |||||||||
Cell:
|
909-560-6187 |
Account Code | CSI | Description | Total | |||||
3-40000-1021 | 00-7213 |
General Conditions
|
[*] | |||||
3-40000-1015 | 01-3100 |
Project Management & Coordination
|
[*] | |||||
3-40000-1012 | 01-5126 |
Temporary Power & Lighting
|
[*] | |||||
3-40000-1010 | 01-5623 |
Temporary Barricades
|
[*] | |||||
3-40000-1011 | 01-5626 |
Temporary Fencing
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-1054 | 01-5723 |
Temporary Storm Water Pollution (SWPPP)
|
[*] | |||||
3-40000-1002 | 01-7423 |
Final Cleaning
|
[*] | |||||
General
Conditions Subtotal
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
3-25000-1004 | 02-2113 |
Survey & Control
|
[*] | |||||
13-1213 |
Fountain Entry Feature (Reflecting Pond)
|
[*] | ||||||
3-20000-1000 | 31-2213 |
Grading Rough & Precise
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7052 |
Landscape Maintenance
|
[*] | ||||||
3-20000-2073 | 32-1123 |
Aggregate Base (Fire Road & Maintenance)
|
[*] | |||||
3-23000-1045 | 32-1313 |
Concrete Paving
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-4084 | 32-1219 |
Asphalt Paving
|
[*] | |||||
Theodore Ramp -Allowance
|
[*] | |||||||
Theodore Street
|
[*] | |||||||
3-20000-5020 | 31-1316 |
Stamped Concrete Paving
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-5008 | 32-1613.16 |
Cast-ln-Place Concrete Curbs
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-4032 | 32-1723 |
Pavement Markings, Signage, Tactile Surfacing
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7547 | 32-3113 |
Chain Link Fencing & Gates
|
[*] | |||||
3-24003-3053 | 32-3213 |
Cast-ln-Place Concrete Screen Walls
|
[*] | |||||
3-24032-3119 | 32-3119 |
Decorative Metal Fences & Gates
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7550 | 32-3219 |
Unit Masonry Walls
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7012 | 32-8413 |
Irrigation & Drip Systems
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7001 | 32-9113.26 |
Landscape Planting
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-3501 | 33-1116 |
Water Domestic
|
[*] | |||||
Redlands Ramp Domestic Water Loop Connector
|
[*] | |||||||
3-20000-3547 | 33-1119 |
Water Fire
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-3001 | 33-3113 |
Sanitary Sewer Systems
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-2001 | 33-4113 |
Storm Drainage systems
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-2030 | 33-4216 |
Concrete Storm Drainage Box Culverts
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-6012 | 33-7139-23 |
Site Underground Electrical
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-6012 | 33-7119.13 |
Site Electrical Transformers & Vault
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-6012 | 33-7139-23 |
Offsite Electrical Form Dracaea
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-6012 | 33-7183 |
Offsite Electrical (60 HWY Jack & Bore)
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-6014 | 33-8113 |
Low Voltage-Dry Utilities (Communications)
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7085 | 12-9313 |
Bike Racks, Benches, Pots, Urns, Trash Recept
|
[*] | |||||
2051477 | 10-7516 |
Flag Poles
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7543 | 32-3119 |
Structural Steel (Trash Gates & Lids)
|
[*] | |||||
3-24009-9100 | 09-9113 |
Paint
|
[*] | |||||
3-20000-7009 | 26-3213 |
Site Electrical & generator
|
[*] | |||||
Site Subtotal
|
$ | [*] |
* | Confidential Portions Omitted and Filed Separately with the Commission. |
Account Code | CSI | Description | Total | |||||
03-2100 |
Reinforcement Steel
|
[*] | ||||||
03-3100 |
Cast-ln-Place Concrete
|
[*] | ||||||
05-1223 |
Structural Steel building
|
[*] | ||||||
05-3113 |
Metal Deck
|
[*] | ||||||
05-7313 |
Glazing Decorative Metal Railing
|
[*] | ||||||
06-1113 |
Rough Carpentry
|
[*] | ||||||
06-1516 |
Panelized Roof
|
[*] | ||||||
06-2033 |
Interior Finish Carpentry (Millwork)
|
[*] | ||||||
06-8200 |
Glass Fiber reinforced Plastic (Marlite)
|
[*] | ||||||
07-1113 |
Bituminous Dampproofing
|
[*] | ||||||
07-2116 |
Blanket Insulation
|
[*] | ||||||
07-4213 |
Metal Wall/Soffit Panels
|
[*] | ||||||
07-5423 |
Thermoplastic Polyolefin Roofing
|
[*] | ||||||
07-6200 |
Sheet Metal Flashing a trim
|
[*] | ||||||
07-7236 |
Smoke Ventilating Skylights
|
[*] | ||||||
Vertical Joint Sealant
|
[*] | |||||||
07-9216 |
Rigid Joint Sealants
|
[*] | ||||||
08-1213 |
Doors/Frames/Hardware
|
[*] | ||||||
08-3619 |
Multi-Leaf Vertical Lift Doors
|
[*] | ||||||
08-8000 |
Glass & Glazing
|
[*] | ||||||
09-2116 |
Gypsum Board Assemblies
|
[*] | ||||||
09-3100 |
Thin-Set Tiling
|
[*] | ||||||
09-5113 |
Acoustical Panel Ceilings
|
[*] | ||||||
09-6223 |
Bamboo Flooring
|
[*] | ||||||
09-6536 |
Static Control Resilient Flooring
|
[*] | ||||||
09-6816 |
Sheet Carpeting
|
[*] | ||||||
09-6953 |
Access Flooring Accessories (Mats)
|
[*] | ||||||
09-9100 |
Painting & wall Covering
|
[*] | ||||||
09-9723 |
Concrete Coating Floor Sealer
|
[*] | ||||||
10-1400 |
Plastic Signage restrooms
|
[*] | ||||||
10-2813.13 |
Metal toilet Compartments & Accessories
|
[*] | ||||||
10-4116 |
Emergency Key Cabinets (Knox Box)
|
[*] | ||||||
10-4416 |
Fire Extinguisher & Cabinets
|
[*] | ||||||
10-5113 |
Lockers (solid Plastic)
|
[*] | ||||||
10-8213 |
Decorative Airfoil Louvers & Wire Screening
|
[*] | ||||||
11-1313 |
Loading Dock Bumpers
|
[*] | ||||||
12-2413 |
Roller Window Shades
|
[*] | ||||||
14-2423 |
Hydraulic Passenger Elevator
|
[*] | ||||||
21-1313 |
Wet-Pipe Sprinkler System
|
[*] | ||||||
22-4213 |
Commercial Water Closet, Urinals, Fixtures
|
[*] | ||||||
23-0000 |
Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning
|
[*] | ||||||
26-0100 |
Electrical
|
[*] | ||||||
26-5113 |
Lighting
|
[*] | ||||||
28-3100 |
Fire Alarm System
|
[*] | ||||||
Building Subtotal
|
$ | [*] |
* | Confidential Portions Omitted and Filed Separately with the Commission. |
Account Code | CSI | Description | Total | |||||
PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY
|
||||||||
GCs
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Site
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Building
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Subtotal
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Pre-Purchase of Steel & Sprinkler Pipe
|
-$ | [*] | ||||||
Subtotal
|
[*] | |||||||
Professional Insurance Design Build
|
[*] | |||||||
Diffenbaugh Professional Lib / Polluition
|
[*] | |||||||
Liability Insurance & Sub-Guard (0.5%)
|
[*] | |||||||
Subtotal
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Overhead & Profit (1.75%)
|
[*] | |||||||
Subtotal
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Bond/Subguard Fees (1.15%)
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Subtotal
|
$ | [*] | ||||||
Bond Three Major Subcontractors
|
[*] | |||||||
Contingency Allowance
|
[*] | |||||||
Contract Total
|
$ | [*] |
* | Confidential Portions Omitted and Filed Separately with the Commission. |
ARCHITECTURAL
|
||||||
A0.1
|
Highland Fairview Corporate Park Title Sheet ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A0.2
|
Highland Fairview Corporate Park General Sheet | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.1
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.2
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.3
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.1
|
Overall Site Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.2
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.3
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.4
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 4 | |||
A1.5
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 5 | |||
A1.6
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 6 | |||
A1.7
|
Pump House Plans | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.8
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 4 | |||
A2.1
|
Overall Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.2
|
Enlarged Floor Plan ASI #4 | 1 /28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.3
|
Enlarged Mezzanine Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A2.4
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.5
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.6
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.7
|
Enlarged Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
A2.8
|
Enlarged Restroom Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.9
|
Enlarged Restroom Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.10
|
Enlarged Stair Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.11
|
Reflected Ceiling Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.12
|
Reflected Ceiling Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A2.13
|
Reflected Ceiling Plan ASI #4 | 1 /28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.14
|
Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A2.15
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.16
|
Enlarged Roof Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.1
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.2
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.3
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.4
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.5
|
Elevations ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A4.1
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A4.2
|
Wall Section ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A4.3
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A4.4
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A4.5
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 |
ARCHITECTURAL CONTINUATION
|
||||||
A4.6
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A4.7
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A5.1
|
Room Finish Schedule ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
A5.1A
|
Door Hardware Schedule | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A5.2
|
Door Schedule | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A5.3
|
Room Finish Legend ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A5.4
|
First Floor Office Finish Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A5.5
|
Mezzanine Finish Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A5.6
|
Finish Plan @ Warehouse | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A6.1
|
Interior Elevations ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A6.2
|
Interior Elevations ASI #3 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
A6.3
|
Interior Elevations ASI #4 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 4 | |||
A6.4
|
Interior Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A6.5
|
Interior Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A6.6
|
Interior Elevations ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A6.7
|
Not Used | |||||
A6.8
|
Interior Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A6.9
|
Interior Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A6.10
|
Interior Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.1
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.1A
|
Site Details for ADA Access | 12/4/2009 | Delta 4 | |||
AD.2
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.3
|
Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
AD.3A
|
Details ASI #3 | 12/30/2008 | Delta 5 | |||
AD.4
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.5
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.6
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.7
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.8
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.9
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.10
|
Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
AD.11
|
Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
EGRESS PLAN
|
||||||
T01
|
Title Layout Egress Plan West Section | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
T02
|
Title Layout Egress Plan Center Section Mezzanine Level | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
T03
|
Title Layout Egress Plan Center Section Floor Level | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
T04
|
Title Layout Egress Plan East Section | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
|
Floor Level Restrooms / Mezzanine Level Restrooms | 12/10/2008 | ||||
STRUCTURAL
|
||||||
S1
|
Foundation Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | (Delta 6) | |||
S2
|
Foundation Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | (Delta 6) | |||
S3
|
Foundation Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | (Delta 6) | |||
S4
|
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | (Delta 6) | |||
S5
|
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan | 7/25/2008 | ||||
S6
|
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan | 7/25/2008 |
STRUCTURAL
CONTINUATION
|
||||||
S7
|
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S8
|
Mezzanine Floor Framing Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
S9
|
Partial Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S10
|
Partial Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S11
|
Partial Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S12
|
Roof Information | 7/25/2008 | ||||
S13
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1 /28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S14
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S15
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S15A
|
Curtain Wall Framing Plan | 7/25/2008 | ||||
S16
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S17
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S18
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/16/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S19
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/17/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S20
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
S21
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S22
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S23
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S24
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S25
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S26
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S27
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S28
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S29
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S30
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S31
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S32
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S33
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S34
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S35
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S36
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S37
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S38
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S39
|
Panel Elevation | 7/25/2008 | ||||
S40
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S41
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
SD1
|
General Notes | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD1A
|
Special Inspections | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD2
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
SD3
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD4
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD5
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD6
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD7
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD8
|
Construction Details ASI #4 | 1 /28/2009 | Detail 6 |
STRUCTURAL CONTINUATION
|
||||||
SD9
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD10
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD11
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD12
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD13
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD14
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD15
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD16
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD17
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD18
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD19
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD20
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD21
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD22
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD23
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
SD24
|
Construction Details ASI #3 | 12/30/2008 | Delta 5 | |||
SPH1
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SPH2
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SPH3
|
General Notes | 7/25/2008 | ||||
MECHANICAL
|
||||||
M-0.0
|
Title Sheet | 11/14/2008 | ||||
M-0.1
|
Title 24 | 11/14/2008 | ||||
M-1
|
Schedules & Notes | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-1.1
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-2
|
Partial Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-3
|
Partial Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-4
|
Partial Floor Plan ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-5
|
Mezzanine Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/13/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
M-6
|
Partial Floor Plan ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-7
|
Partial Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-8
|
Partial Roof Plan -ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-9
|
Details | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-10
|
Controls ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
PLUMBING
|
||||||
P-1
|
Specifications & Calculations ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-2
|
Overall Site Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-2.1
|
Partial Site Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-2.2
|
Partial Site Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-3
|
Partial Floor, Roof Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-4
|
Partial Floor, Roof Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-5
|
Partial Floor, Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-6
|
Restroom Details ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-7
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-8
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-9
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 |
PLUMBING CONTINUATION
|
||||||
P-10
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-11
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-12
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-13
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-14
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-15
|
Waste & Vent Isometrics | 11/11/208 | Delta 2 | |||
P-16
|
Hot & Cold Water Isometrics | 11/11/208 | Delta 2 | |||
P-17
|
Plumbing Details ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
ELECTRICAL
|
||||||
EO.1
|
Specifications, Symbols & Abbreviations | 11/14/2008 | ||||
EO.2
|
Outdoor Title 24 ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
EO.3
|
Indoor Title 24 ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E1.1A
|
Partial Site Electrical Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E1.1B
|
Partial Site Electrical Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E1.2A
|
Partial Site Lighting Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E1.2B
|
Partial Site Lighting Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E1.2C
|
Partial Site Photometric Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E1.2D
|
Partial Site Photometric Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E2.1
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E2.2
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E2.3
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E2.4
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E2.5
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E2.6
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E2.7
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E3.1
|
Warehouse Electrical Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E3.2
|
Warehouse Underground Conduit Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E3.3
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.4
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.5
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.6
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.7
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.8
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E4
|
Warehouse Electrical Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E5.1
|
Enlarged Main Office Ground Floor Lighting Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E5.2
|
Enlarged Main Office Second Floor Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E5.3
|
Enlarged Warehouse Office Lighting Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E6.1
|
Enlarged Main Office Ground Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E6.2
|
Enlarged Main Office Second Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E6.3
|
Enlarged Main Office Roof Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E6.4
|
Enlarged Warehouse Office Power Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E6.5
|
Enlarged Dock Door Power Plans ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E7
|
Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E8.1
|
Wiring Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E8.2
|
Wiring Diagram & Fixture Schedule ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 |
ELECTRICAL CONTINUED
|
||||||
E8.3
|
Wiring Diagrams ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E8.4
|
Wiring Diagrams ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E9
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E10
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E11
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E12
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E13
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E14
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
EFP1
|
Fire Pump House Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
FIRE PROTECTION PARCEL 1 / SKECHERS
|
||||||
HFCP
|
Cover Page | |||||
FP 1
|
Underground Fire Master Plan | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 2
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part I | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 3
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part II | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 4
|
Underground Fire Notes / Details | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 5
|
Diesel Fire Pump Plans & Details | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 6
|
Overhead Master Plan Area A (reference only) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 7
|
Overhead Master Plan Area B (reference only) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 8
|
Overhead Master Plan Area C (reference only) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 9
|
System 1 4 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 10
|
System 5 9 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 11
|
System 10 14 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 12
|
System 15 19 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 13
|
System 20 24 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 14
|
System 25 29 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 15
|
System 30 34 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 16
|
System 35 39 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 17
|
System 40 44 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 18
|
System 45 48 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 19
|
Building Section & Maximum Storage Heights | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 20
|
Overhead Sprinkler Layout Notes | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 21
|
1st Floor Room Coverage Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 22
|
Mezzanine Piping Plan & Details | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 23
|
2 Second Floor Room Coverage Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 24
|
2 Second Floor Piping Enlarged | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 25
|
Warehouse Office Room Coverage Plans & Piping Enlargements | 2/12/2009 | ||||
SR-60 CONSTRUCTION STAGING PLAN
|
||||||
SC 1
|
Stage Construction | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TH 01
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TH 02
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TH 03
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 4/9/2010 |
REDLANDS BLVD. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
|
||||||
TCP 1
|
Traffic Control Plan Title Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 2
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I & II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 3
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 4
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 5
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 6
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
ROUGH GRADING
|
||||||
RGP 1
|
Rough Grading Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 2
|
Rough Grading Plan Detail Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 3
|
Rough Grading Plan Detail Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 4
|
Rough Grading Plan Detail Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 5
|
Rough Grading Plan Storm Drain Profiles | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 6
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 7
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 8
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 9
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 10
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 11
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 12
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 13
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 14
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 15
|
Rough Grading Plan Erosion Control | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 16
|
Rough Grading Plan Erosion Control | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 17
|
Rough Grading Plan Noise Reduction Compliance Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 18
|
Rough Grading Plan Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 19
|
Rough Grading Plan Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
PRECISE GRADING
|
||||||
PG 1
|
Precise Grading Title Sheet | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 2
|
Precise Grading Detail Sheet | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 3
|
Precise Grading Detail Sheet | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 4
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 5
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 6
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 7
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 8
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 9
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 10
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 11
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 12
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 13
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 14
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 15
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 16
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 17
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 18
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 |
PRECISE GRADING CONTINUED
|
||||||
PG 19
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 20
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 21
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 22
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 23
|
Conditions of Approval | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 24
|
Conditions of Approval | 4/12/2010 | ||||
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PLAN ROUGH GRADING
|
||||||
EPP 1
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 2
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 3
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 4
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 5
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
ROUGH GRADING REDLANDS SEWER
|
||||||
RGP 1
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 2
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Drainage | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 3
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Drainage | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 4
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Drainage | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 5
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Erosion Control | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 6
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 7
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 8
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 9
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 10
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 11
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 12
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 13
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
CALTRANS EROSION CONTROL PLAN
|
||||||
EC 5
|
EROSION CONTROL WPCD | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TEMPORARY STORM DRAIN SYSTEM PHASE 1
|
||||||
TDD 1
|
Phase 1 Temporary Drainage Ditch | 2/18/2009 | ||||
GRADING CROSS SECTIONS
|
||||||
GCS 1
|
Grading Cross Sections | 2/18/2009 | ||||
GCS 2
|
Grading Cross Sections | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SITE FIRE ACCESS PLAN
|
||||||
FPS 1
|
Site Fire Access Plan (During Construction) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FPS 2
|
Site Fire Access Plan (Job Completion) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
PARCEL 1 WALL & FENCE TILT-UP WALL
|
||||||
LCS-0
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Cover Sheet | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LR-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Reference Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-07
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 |
PARCEL 1 WALL
& FENCE TILT-UP WALL CONTINUED
|
||||||
LW-08
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-09
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-10
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-11
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-12
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Notes | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-07
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-08
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-09
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-10
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-11
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-12
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-13
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LWD-14
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-15
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-16
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-17
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-18
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-19
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-20
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWN-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 - Wall & Fence Construction Specifications | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LINE F STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Moreno MDP Line F Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Moreno MDP Line F Notes & Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 95+20 to 97+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 97+-00 to 103+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 103+00 to 110+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 6
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 110+00 to 118+05 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 7
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 118+05 to 122+56.73 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 8
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 122+56.73 to 124+42.37 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 9
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-2 10+00 to 11+49.18 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 10
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-2-A 10+00 to 11+41.56 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 11
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat D-5 10+00 to 11+52.91 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 12
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat D-6 10+00 to 14+68.98 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 13
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 0+25.13 to 8+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 14
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 8+00 to 16+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 15
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 16+00 to 24+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 16
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 24+00 to 31+50 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 17
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 10+00 to 12+00.25 | 4/9/2010 |
Project: H
highland Fairview Corporate Park
Trade:
General Contractor
LINE F STORM DRAIN SYSTEM CONTINUED
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-9 11+02.55 to 18+00
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-9 18+00 to 25+65.60
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Outlet, Access Raod & Basin
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F General Notes & typ Details
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Typ Details
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Lateral & Sections
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Lateral
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F Access Opening Sections & typ Details
4/9/2010
Moreno MDP Line F typ Sections & Details
4/9/2010
REDLANDS SANITARY SEWER
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan Title Sheet
4/9/2010
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan Index & Legends
4/9/2010
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
EUCALYPTUS SANITARY SEWER PLAN
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Title Sheet
4/9/2010
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Index & Legend
4/9/2010
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile
4/9/2010
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile
4/9/2010
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile
4/9/2010
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile
4/9/2010
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile
4/9/2010
LOGISTIC BUILDING SEWER AND WATER
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan Title Sheet
4/9/2010
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan Notes & Quantities
4/9/2010
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan
4/9/2010
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan
4/9/2010
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan
4/9/2010
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan
4/9/2010
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan
4/9/2010
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan
4/9/2010
EUCALPTUS RECYCLED WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Title Sheet
4/9/2010
Plan
4/9/2010
Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
Plan & Profile
4/9/2010
EUCALYPTUS WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
DW 1
|
Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 2
|
Index Map & Legend | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 3
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 4
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 5
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 6
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 7
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 8
|
Line A thru D profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
Off-Site (Sinclair) DOMESTIC WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
DWIP 1
|
Domestic Water Plans title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 2
|
Domestic Water Plans Index Map & Legends | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 3
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 4
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 5
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 6
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 7
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 8
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 9
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 10
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
REDLANDS WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
DWIP 1
|
Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 2
|
Index Map | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 3
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 4
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION PLAN
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
REDLANDS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION PLAN
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SKECHERS ONSITE ELECTRIC
|
||||||
SWP 1
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SWP 2
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SWP 3
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SWP 4
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
STIP 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Notes & Index Map | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Details & Sections | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 5
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 |
|
EUCALYPTUS STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN CONTINUATION | |||||
STIP 6
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 7
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 8
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 9
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 10
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 11
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Signing & Striping Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 12
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Signing & Striping Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 13
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Conditions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 14
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Conditions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SCE EXHIBIT JACK & BORE SCE CONDUIT
|
||||||
SCE-J&B
|
Jack & Bore Exhibit SE Conduit Under SR60 | 8/25/2009 | ||||
SCE-Pole
|
Cross Section B-B (SCE Pole No. 4001945E) | 8/25/2009 | ||||
SCE-Pole
|
Cross Section A-A (SCE Pole No. 214347/T2964 | 8/25/2009 | ||||
MEDIAN EXHIBIT
|
||||||
E-1
|
Exhibit Sections Eucalyptus Street Median | 7/22/2009 | ||||
TOLERANCE EXHIBIT
|
||||||
TE
|
Tolerance Exhibit | 2/18/2009 | ||||
THEODORE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN (THEODORE RAMP IMPROVEMENT PLANS)
|
||||||
STIP 1
|
Theodore Street Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 2
|
Theodore Street Notes & Index Map Typical Sections | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 3
|
Theodore Street Improvement Plans | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 4
|
Theodore Street Construction Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 5
|
Theodore Street Construction Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 6
|
Theodore Street Grading-Drainage-Utility Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 7
|
Theodore Street W.P.C.P | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 8
|
Theodore Street Signing and Striping Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 9
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 10
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 11
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 12
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 13
|
Theodore Street Detour Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT
|
||||||
421
|
Traffic Signal Interconnect Detail | 1/1/2008 | ||||
EVTSI
|
Emergency Vehicle & Traffic Signal Interconnect | 10/22/2009 | ||||
THEODORE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
STIP 1
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 2
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Construction Notes | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 3
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Typical Street Secitons | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 4
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 5
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 6
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Signing and Striping | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 7
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 8
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 9
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS STREET LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Eucalyptus Street Cover Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 |
EUCALYPTUS STREET
LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION CONTINUED
|
||||||
SHT 3
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 6
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 7
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 8
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 9
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 10
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 11
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 12
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 13
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 14
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 15
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 16
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 17
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 18
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 19
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 20
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 21
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 22
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 23
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 24
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 25
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 26
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 27
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 28
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 29
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 30
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 31
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 32
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
HFCP ASSOCIATION LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||||
LCS-0
|
HFCP Association Cover Sheet | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-01
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-02
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-03
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-04
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-05
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-06
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-07
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-08
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-09
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-10
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-11
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-12
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 |
HFCP ASSOCIATION LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION CONTINUED
|
||||
LI-13
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LI-14
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LI-15
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
HFCP ASSOCIATION LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||
LI-16
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LI-17
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LID-1
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Details | 3/22/2010 | ||
LID-2
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Details | 3/22/2010 | ||
LIN-1
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Notes | 3/22/2010 | ||
LIN-2
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Specifications | 3/22/2010 | ||
LIN-3
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Specifications | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-01
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-02
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-03
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-04
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-05
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-06
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-07
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-08
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-09
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-10
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-11
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-12
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-13
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-14
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-15
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-16
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LP-17
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||
LPD-01
|
HFCP Association Planting Details | 3/22/2010 | ||
LPD-02
|
HFCP Association Planting Details | 3/22/2010 | ||
LCD-01
|
HFCP Association Construction Specification | 3/22/2010 | ||
LCD-02
|
HFCP Association Construction Details | 3/22/2010 | ||
PARCEL 1 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||
LCS-0
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Cover Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-07
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-08
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-09
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-010
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||
LC-011
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan Enlargements | 2/18/2009 |
PARCEL 1 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION CONTINUATION
|
||||||
LCD-01
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Construction Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-02
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-03
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-04
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-05
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-06
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCN-01
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Construction Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-01
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-02
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-03
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-04
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-05
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-06
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-07
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-08
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-09
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-10
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LID-1
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LID-2
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LIN-01
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LIN-02
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LIN-03
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-01
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-02
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-03
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-04
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-05
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-06
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-07
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-08
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-09
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-10
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LPD-01
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LPD-02
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LPN-01
|
HFCP - Parcel 1 - Planting Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
WEI WEST WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT, INC.
|
||||||
SA00
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Overall Plan View | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA01
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA02
|
Structure Layout | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA03
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA04
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA05
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA06
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA07
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 |
WEI WEST WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT, INC. CONTINUTED
|
||||||
SA08
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA09
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Footing Details | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB00
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Overall Plan View | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB01
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Overall Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB02
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Overall Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB03
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Footing Detail | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG01
|
Structure Layout Extendable Conveyor Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG02
|
Structure Layout Extendable Conveyor Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG03
|
Structure Layout Extendable Footings Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG04
|
Structure Layout Extendable Footings Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG05
|
Structure Layout Extendable Footings Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG06
|
Structure Layout Extendable Tracks Footing Cross Sections | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW
CORPORATE PARK PROJECT MANUAL
|
||||||
Div 00
|
Procurement and Contracting requirements | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 01
|
General requirements | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 02
|
Sitrework | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 03
|
Concrete | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 04
|
Masonry | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 05
|
Metals | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 06
|
Wood and Plastics | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 07
|
Thermal and Moisture Control | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 08
|
Doors and Windows | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 09
|
Finishes | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 10
|
Specialties | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 11
|
Equipment | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 12
|
Furnishings | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 13
|
Special Construction | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 14
|
Conveyor Systems | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 15
|
Mechanical | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 16
|
Electrical | 7/24/2008 | ||||
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC.
|
||||||
1.0
|
Introduction | 6/15/2007 | ||||
2.0
|
Geotechnical Investigation & Lab | 6/15/2007 | ||||
3.0
|
Summary | 6/15/2007 | ||||
4.0
|
Faulting & Seismicity | 6/15/2007 | ||||
5.0
|
Conclusions | 6/15/2007 | ||||
6.0
|
Preliminary Recommendations | 6/15/2007 | ||||
7.0
|
Geotechnical Review | 6/15/2007 | ||||
8.0
|
Limitations | 6/15/2007 | ||||
map
|
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log | 6/15/2007 | ||||
UPDATED PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC.
|
||||||
1.0
|
Introduction | 4/30/2008 | ||||
2.0
|
Geotechnical Investigation & Lab | 4/30/2008 | ||||
3.0
|
Summary | 4/30/2008 | ||||
4.0
|
Faulting & Seismicity | 4/30/2008 |
UPDATED PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC. CONTINUED
|
||||
5.0
|
Conclusions | 4/30/2008 | ||
6.0
|
Preliminary Recommendations | 4/30/2008 | ||
7.0
|
Geotechnical Review | 4/30/2008 | ||
8.0
|
Limitations | 4/30/2008 | ||
map
|
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log | 4/30/2008 | ||
OTHER SOILS REPORTS
|
||||
|
Update Seismic Design Parameters | 11/30/2007 | ||
|
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, SR-60 Widening | 7/30/2008 | ||
|
Clarifications to Soils, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 8/15/2008 | ||
|
response to City of M.V. Review Comments & Map | 11/5/2008 | ||
|
geotechnical Recommendations for Temporary Fire Access Road | 1/5/2009 | ||
|
Clarifications #2 to Soils Report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 1/14/2009 | ||
|
Response to City of M.V. Review Comments, Public Works Depart. | 1/16/2009 | ||
|
Geotechnical Review of Improvements & rough Grade for Sanitary Sewer | 1/21/2009 | ||
|
Clarifications #3 to Soils report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 1 /29/2009 | ||
|
Rough Grading Anticipated Keyway Locations | 1 /29/2009 | ||
|
recommended Sub drain Locations | 2/6/2009 | ||
|
Infiltration Characteristics of onsite soils | 6/23/2008 | ||
|
Supplemental Remedial Grading Rec. Skechers VAS Platform | 2/6/2009 | ||
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
|
||||
|
Structural Calculations by David Kramer | 2/2/2009 | ||
TITLE 24 REPORT
|
||||
|
title 24 Report by Alan Poydock - Thermalair, Inc. | 1/30/2009 | ||
CIVIL MISC. EXHIBITS & REPORTS
|
||||
|
Drainage Bypass for Redlands Sewer Work Area | 2/18/2009 | ||
|
Grading Balance Area | 2/18/2009 | ||
|
Highland SWPPP | 2/18/2009 | ||
|
Set Back for Restricted Hours of Work | 2/18/2009 | ||
|
Existing Stockpile Locations | 2/18/2009 | ||
|
Mitigation Monitoring Program by Michael Brandman Assoc. | 12/23/2008 | ||
|
Septic Exhibit | 1/7/2009 |
1. | Value Engineering will be ongoing in an attempt to reduce the project cost of construction with help of the architect and owner. |
2. | A total of ten (10) rain days are included in the project schedule. | ||
3. | Accelerated Schedule is included. | ||
4. | Site & Construction signage will require owner approval; also recommendation will be made for layout and style requirements as directed by owner. |
1. | Temporary Barricades W/ Gawk screen shall be used (K-Rails). | ||
2. | Site construction fencing to be three (3) sides for duration of project and kept in good order & appearance, with screening at public view locations. | ||
3. | Car pooling and documentation shall be administered for duration of project. | ||
4. | All construction access shall be from Theodore Street only. | ||
5. | Street sweeping must be on-going, street maintained for total duration of project, Must Be Clean and street sweepers used during the construction of Corporate Park adhere to Mitigation & Monitoring Plan; MM AQ-1 and Plot Plan COA P37.. .equipment certification under SCAQMD Rule 1186.1. | ||
6. | Documentation of notification to subcontractors and their workers to Rules & Regulations. | ||
7. | Coordination with Native American groups to monitor site grading. | ||
8. | Sign-In Sheet & Visitors Log must be managed at all times. | ||
9. | Building LEED certification target goal to be Silver Certification. | ||
10. | Temporary Project signage must be (prior to installation) approved by Owner. | ||
11. | Waste Management: The contractor will recycle and or salvage a minimum of 50% (by weight) of non-hazardous construction and demolition debris. | ||
12. | Recycled Materials: The contractor will use materials with recycled content at all opportunities with review by Owner. The sum of post-consumer recycled content plus one-half of the pre-construction recycled content constitutes at least 10% (cost-based) on the total value of the materials in the project. | ||
13. | Regional Materials: The project will use building materials of products that have been extracted, harvested or recovered, as well as manufactured, with-in 500 miles of the project site for a minimum of 10% (cost-based) of the total materials value. | ||
14. | Contractor will utilize only those paints and coatings that comply with credit 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 of the LEED standards. | ||
15. | The project will utilize a locally-sourced concrete supplier and interior fixture providing a 40% water use savings. | ||
16. | A temporary power and communications line to Owner trailers is included. | ||
17. | Survey and control of Jack-N-Bore at SR-60 and Redlands Boulevard is included. |
1. | Entry fountain budget Black Plaster Finish in lieu of Pebble Tech is accepted | ||
2. | No coping on the Jewel Box, building to look as if it is floating on water. | ||
3. | Fountain final design by Fountain Contractor (Design-Build) contract. |
1. | Control of nuisance dust created by the work of this contract in included. Dust control resulting from inclement weather or winds (above and beyond AQMD standards) is excluded. | ||
2. | Tier III / B20 Fuel equipment must be utilized; Tier II equipment must have prior approval by Owner before use on site. | ||
3. | For retaining walls and any details missing, the contractor will use the Moreno Valley Standards for the construction methods. | ||
4. | Envirotec II Acrylic Polymer w/ green dye to slopes is included. | ||
5. | SWPPP changes as of July 1, 2010 are included. | ||
6. | Access road added at Theodore Ramp & SR-60 for Cal-Trans access is included. | ||
7. | Additional removal and Engineered fill for stabilization at retention area at Cal-trans slope Pad Two (2), is included. |
8. | Access road for maintenance Line F is included. | ||
9. | Staging area changed form south of project to Parcel 4, is included. | ||
10. | Removal of septic tanks is included. | ||
11. | Removal of foundations from barn removal is included. | ||
12. | Removal of trees stubs is included. | ||
13. | Theodore left-turn widening allowance is included. | ||
14. | Pre-Watering is included. | ||
15. | 95% compaction under all PCC driveways and parking is included. | ||
16. | Over-X and pads for tenant equipment is included. | ||
17. | Sub-drainage systems in all basins typ. Is included. | ||
18. | Fine grading and base on Sinclair is included. | ||
19. | Documentation for B20 Biodiesel is included. | ||
20. | Rumble plates BMPs at site entrance and exit is included. | ||
21. | Fine grade and base is included at Sinclair Street. |
1. | Vine Trellis fencing is included as specified. | ||
2. | Washingtonia Palms in lieu of Date Palms at locations (other than Main Entry) is included. | ||
3. | Street and City Landscaping will carry One (1) year maintenance agreement. | ||
4. | Association and Corporate Park landscaping will carry a ninety (90) day maintenance agreement. | ||
5. | Tukor RKD 2 -in lieu of specified controllers is included. | ||
6. | A plant pre-purchase growing material is included. | ||
7. | Service laterals for irrigation not shown on drawings are included | ||
8. | Meter laterals, Backflow Preventers (Median 1 meter) (Assoc. 3 meter) (CP 2 meter) are included. | ||
9. | Irrigation buster pumps are included as required. |
1. | Aggregate base for fire roads to be supplied by Owner. | ||
2. | Aggregate base for city streets to be furnished by subcontractor. |
1. | All On-Site Drives and Parking to be concrete per Leighton Engineering specifications. | ||
2. | All on-site pavers to be colored stamped concrete to be in lieu of Pavers. | ||
3. | Pervious concrete in median is included or Pavers may be used to meet pervious requirement. |
1. | AG Base included per city standards on all city streets in lieu of Owner supplied base. | ||
2. | Asphalt paving to be on city streets only. | ||
3. | Current profile 6:12 in lieu of 6:10 is included. | ||
4. | Slurry Sealer by Owner for Eucalyptus Street at a later date. | ||
5. | Street patching and slurry at all crossing (patch & slurry), is included. | ||
6. | Adjust all water valve and manhole covers to finish grade is included. | ||
7. | Theodore Ramp @ SR-60, allowances per drawings and direction by Highland Fairview is included. |
1. | Addition of V-Ditch is included. |
1. | Added Four Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-One (4,471) lineal feet of Cal-Trans standard chain link fence (157/lf shown on plan) is included. |
1. | Site screen wall overhead panels have been removed at gate entries. |
1. | Gates, Motors, Controllers at employee parking areas is included. | ||
2. | Entry Gate motors and controllers are included. | ||
3. | Gates to have Strobe Sensors per Moreno Valley Fire authority standards. | ||
4. | Protection bollards at entry gates are included. |
5. | Fire Access gate operating system to be Opticon System per Fire Marshals direction is included. |
1. | PCC concrete is lieu of masonry walls is included. | ||
2. | Details to be Moreno valley city standards for retaining walls. |
1. | Water assembly for water meters is included. | ||
2. | Two (2) each pressure reducing valve stations Redlands and Sinclair are included. | ||
3. | Backflow preventer devices are included. | ||
4. | Previsions for 1 meter at Median, 2 meter at Corporate Park and 3 meter at Association are included. |
1. | Scope and drawings per Highland Fairview direction is included. |
1. | Temporary fire water will be required at the time of roofing materials delivery and installation. | ||
2. | Added fire laterals to pads 1 and 4 are included. | ||
3. | Fire line change from 10 to 12 is included. | ||
4. | Stainless Steel hardware is included. | ||
5. | Fire protection bollards are included. |
1. | Added laterals to service future pads 2, 3 and 4 are included. |
1. | Rip-Rap change in design Line F is included. | ||
2. | Secondary Outlet structure is included. | ||
3. | Temporary transitions=al 24 HDPE pipe form north basin is not required and not included. | ||
4. | Off-Site storm drainage at Redlands Blvd. is included. | ||
5. | Added Large trash gate and fencing is included. |
1. | Includes all conductors. | ||
2. | Includes changes to 2,500 KVA transformers. | ||
3. | Includes traffic signal interconnect. | ||
4. | Includes power for landscape maintenance electrical powered maintenance equipment. | ||
5. | Underground Electrical includes High-Voltage Transformer & Secondary Distribution is included. | ||
6. | Underground Jack-N-Bore @ SR 60 for future electrical service is included. |
1. | Includes all on-site and off-site cabling. | ||
2. | Includes telephone backbone. | ||
3. | Low-Voltage, Dry Utilities, Communications infrastructure, (Verizon, Time Warner, Gas trench only) are included |
1. | Twenty-Six (26) Marbelite Street lights to be furnished and installed with all underground and infrastructure. |
1. | Guard shacks are furnished by tenant, installed by contractor. |
1. | Flag poles to be: one (1) US flag and pole, one (1) California flag and pole and one (1) pole for Skechers USA flag. | ||
2. | Knox Boxes locations to be determined by Fire Marshal are included. |
1. | Dock numbers interior and exterior located at dock doors per architectural drawings. | ||
2. | Interior Columns to receive Yellow Caution Color to eight feet high. |
1. | Service duct and cable two (2) each are included. | ||
2. | Gas trenching and sanding is included. | ||
3. | Transformer increased to Seven (7) each 2,500 KVA are included. |
4. | Added Four (4) each conduits at Redlands in lieu of Two (2) each for Primary and Secondary distribution is included. |
5. | Electric Car charging stations is included. |
6. | UG electrical service from Dracaea Street west on Redlands Blvd. is included. |
7. | Patch & Slurry Redlands Blvd. is included. |
8. | UG power under SR-60 Two (2) 4 schedule 80 conduits in 12 casing Jack-N-Bore are included. |
1. | Foundation reinforcement for Wynright (WEI) racking equipment is included. |
1. | Foundations for WEI equipment by ICC, per Wynright (WEI) drawings & Kramer Structural Drawings, are included. |
2. | Erecting bolts, & column grouting by Wynright. |
3. | Re-saw and joint filler for Wynright columns. |
4. | Exposed Interior Slabs finish Tolerances shall beFF55, and Tile areas may be FF35. |
5. | Sixty-Five (65%) percent of forms liners removed. |
6. | Exposed aggregate finish (sand blasting) deleted. |
7. | Site perimeter walls to be tilt panel wall construction. |
8. | Haul off of concrete foundations spoils to off-site location for recycling. |
9. | Polished concrete floor finish reviewed at ICC office was accepted by Tenant |
1. | Over-Wall ladders at fire wall on roof are included. |
1. | To be HDI Circrum |
1. | Skylight curbs are not pressure treated. |
1. | Discount taken for Ten (10) day pay discount Four Hundred Twenty-Five (425,000.) thousand dollars. |
1. | Alabaster Wall detail deleted value One Hundred Thousand Dollars. |
1. | Site retaining wall |
2. | Elevator Pit |
3. | On-grade tile and VCT areas. |
1. | Aluminum composite panels by Omega Omega-Lite panels |
1. | Firestone 45mil TPO w/ 20 year NDL warrantee. |
1. | Bristolite 4896-SSVDL-CM-HS1-MF-OR curb mounted double 10# smoke hatch. |
1. | Truck apron and building is included. |
1. | Northwest 24ga. #924 and 20ga at ramp doors. |
1. | Frosted glass in lieu of Polycarbonate panels and hardware |
2. | Standard Kynar Color and finish is accepted. |
3. | Vision Glass 1 insulated (1/4 Solar Cool Cariba 1/2 air gap 1 / 4 Solarban 60 is accepted |
4. | Spandrel Glass 1 / 4 Solar Cool Cariba w/ warm Gray Opacicoat is accepted |
5. | Alternate to Polycarbonate Panel 1 / 4 Clear Annealed glass with frosted finish is accepted |
1. | Crack isolation underlayment on Mezzanine level is included. |
2. | Polished concrete floors in lieu of to be determined. |
1. | 15/16 th tile in lieu of specification thickness. |
1. | Includes matching base. |
1. | Areas to receive polished concrete to be determined. |
2. | Rubber base to be at all polished concrete locations. |
1. | ASI manufactures change in lieu of Bobrick. |
1. | Nine (9) in bids at this time. |
1. | Radius-edge custom louvers are included. |
2. | Jewel Box exterior finish Hendricks Screen per HPA directive, (v-wire, 69v, spacing 3/8 with support rod style Fin, height 1.00) |
1. | Shades on windows boxed openings tilt concrete wall cover. |
2. | Shades added at exterior office glazing |
1. | Otis Holeless Hydraulic 2,500# w/ level 2 cab finish. |
1. | FM 200 System and Pre-Action System included. |
1. | L-4 fixturers in lieu of L-1, L-2, and L-3 |
2. | Plumbing design to be taken over to maintain the Design-Build status. |
1. | Clarifiers to filters and racks in warehouse. |
2. | Mechanical design to be taken over to maintain the Design-Build status. |
1. | Electrical design to be taken over to maintaine the Design-Build status. |
2. | Power to parking lot light poles north parking lot for data scanners. |
3. | Connections to Balers, Shredders and Compactors (furnished by tenant). |
4. | C02 sensors for interlock. |
5. | Install tenant supplied Big Ass Fans. |
6. | Roof penetrations and power for roof top cameras. |
7. | Distribution of electrical for landscape irrigation. |
8. | Charging Station for Electric powered cars by contractor |
9. | Power, Support, Installation of tenant supplied Big Ass Fans shall be included. |
1. | Lighting upgrade included. |
1. | Included: hook-up of tenant/owner supplied equipment by plumber and electrician. |
2. | Maintenance office area not designed, power has been incorporated in plan. |
3. | Battery charging designed, but power has been incorporated in plan. |
4. | Design based on LEED certification. |
5. | On-Site bollards on project have been included (100%) |
6. | Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing drawings must be taken over by contractor and engineering to complete and sign for submittal for permitting |
1. | Permits and plan check fees, utility company charges, encroachment permits. |
2. | Testing and Special Inspections by deputy inspector by owner. |
3. | Builders risk insurance by owner. |
4. | Cost incurred to remove or relocate unknown utilities or structures buried on site not disclosed in contract documents and site visit by General Contractor & his Subcontractor. |
5. | Toxic waste removal. |
6. | Export or import of soil beyond project adjoining land owned by owner. |
7. | Special Insurance to the extent not set forth in Addendum A. |
8. | Site gas line meter. |
9. | Dewatering of ground water not resulting from action or inaction by contractor. |
10. | Soils stabilization methods not shown on plan or specifications which is not a result of action or inaction by the contractor. |
11. | Pest control. |
12. | It is to the General Contractors decision if he employees Guard service; but this does not relieve the responsibility of the contractor to protect all materials and work in place until the time the owner has taken full and final acceptance of same. |
13. | Eyewash at battery storage equipment by owner, rough-in and hock-up by contractor. |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
Tentative Parcel Map Conditions of Approval | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P5
|
Site Maintenance | All undeveloped portions of the site shall be maintained in a manner that provides for the control of weeds, erosion and dust. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P12
|
Archaeo/Paleo | If potential historic, archaeological, or paleontological resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at the project site, work in the affected area will cease immediately and a qualified person (meeting the Secretary of the Interiors standards (36CFR61)) shall be consulted by the applicant to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, prehistoric, or paleontological resource. Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all affected Native American Tribes before any further work commences in the affected area. (Advisory) If human remains are discovered, work in the affected area shall cease immediately and the County Coroner shall be notified. If it is determined that the remains are potentially native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission and any and all affected native American Indians tribes such as the Morongo Band of Mission Indians or the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be notified and appropriate measures provided by State law shall be implemented. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P15
|
Archaeology | A qualified archaeologist and or tribal monitors from any affected Native American Indian tribes shall be present during grading to evaluate and recommend appropriate actions for any archaeological deposits exposed by construction activity. The monitoring archaeologist shall be empowered to halt grading in the vicinity of an exposed archaeological deposit until that deposit can be fully evaluated. The consultant (i.e. archaeologist) shall consult with any and all affected Native American Indian tribes in the area on any Treatment Plan prepared for the project. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P16
|
Mitigation Measures | Prior to the issuance of precise grading permits, mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved with this project shall be implemented as provided therein. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
B-1
|
Applicable Codes | The above project shall comply with the current California Codes (CBC, CEC, CMC and the CPC) as well as all other city ordinances. All new projects shall provide a soils report. Plans shall be submitted to the Building Department as a separate submittal. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F2
|
Fire Flows | The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B and Table B105.1. The applicant/developer shall provide documentation to show there exists a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM for 4 hour(s) duration at 20-PSI residual operating pressure. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Specific requirements for the project will be determined at time of building plan submittal. (CFC 508.3, Appendix B and MVMC 8.36.100 Section D). The 50% reduction in fire flow was granted for the use of fire sprinklers throughout the facility. The reduction shall only apply to fire flow, hydrant spacing shall be per the fire flow requirements listed in CFC Appendix B and C. | Construction | HF/GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
F3
|
Fire Hydrants | Industrial, Commercial, Multi-family, Apartment, Condominium, Townhouse or Mobile Home Parks. A combination of on-site and off-site super enhanced fire hydrants (6 x 4 x 4 x 2 1/2) shall not be closer than 40 feet and more than 150 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved emergency vehicular travel ways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent fire hydrant(s) in the system. Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, super or enhanced fire hydrants as determined by the fire code official shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 500 feet of frontage for transportation hazards. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD6
|
Nuisances (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | The developer shall monitor, supervise and control all construction and construction supportive activities, so as to prevent these activities from causing a public nuisance, including but not limited to, insuring strict adherence to the following: a. Removal of dirt, debris, or other construction material deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day. b. Observance of working hours as stipulated on permits issued by the Public Works Department. c. The construction site shall accommodate the parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the site. d. All dust control measures per South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements shall be adhered to during the grading operations. Violation of any condition or restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions shall subject the owner, applicant, developer or contractor(s) to remedies as noted in the City Municipal Code 8.14.090. In addition, the City Engineer or Building Official may suspend all construction related activities for violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions until such time as it has been determined that all operations and activities are in conformance with these conditions. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD7
|
Downstream Properties (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | The developer shall protect downstream properties from damage caused by alteration of drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including, but not limited to, modifying existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. | Grading | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD19
|
SWPPP (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to grading permit issuance, the developer shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in conformance with the States Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit. A copy of the the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request. The SWPPP shall be submitted to the Citys Storm Water Program Manager on compact disk(s) in Microsoft Word format. The developer is required to bring the SWPPP to the grading pre-construction meeting. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD40
|
R-O-W Permits (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | All work performed within the City right-of-way requires a construction permit. As determined by the City Engineer, security may be required for work within the right-of-way. Security shall be in the form of a cash deposit or other approved means. The City Engineer may require the execution of a public improvement agreement as a condition of the issuance of the construction permit. All inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of construction permit. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD44
|
Waste Management Plan (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit for review and approval, a Waste Management Plan (WMP) per City code and Land Development Division requirements. |
Building
Permit |
HF/GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
LD72
|
Grading Certification (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to issuance of a building permit, final line and grade certification shall be provided by the licensed engineer of record stating the building pad is in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. For Parcel 1, the developer shall coordinate with Land Development staff to facilitate partial pad certification in conjunction with construction sequencing as approved by the City Engineer. The relocation and/or abandonment of existing utilities and quitclaim of existing easements shall be coordinated with the sequencing of the Parcel 1 development such that these do not interfere or encumber the particular building area being developed at any given time. |
Building
Permit |
HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD77
|
Caltrans Jack and Bore (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to occupancy for the proposed building in Phase 1, the developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans and complete the following jack and bore operation for the installation of a proposed water line underneath SR-60 to be located within Sinclair Street right-of-way north of the freeway. The developer shall apply Caltrans crossing requirements to the portion of the water line that will lie within Parcel G of the tentative parcel map. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD80
|
Utilities (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to occupancy of the proposed building in Phase 1, existing utilities shall be relocated outside of Parcels G, 5, and 6, as identified on the tentative parcel map (Parcels 5 and 6 to be dedicated as lettered lots on the final parcel map), being offered for dedication for highway and road purposes. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD81
|
Overhead Electrical Service (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to occupancy of the proposed building in Phase 1, the developer shall bring overhead electrical service to the building from the nearest source identified by the developer to be located on the west side of Redlands Boulevard near Dracaea Avenue. This will require the developer to bore under Redlands Boulevard to the east side of Redlands Boulevard. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD83
|
Infiltrometer Test (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | In accordance with the City of Moreno Valley standards, the Double Ring Infiltrometer field testing method per ASTM D3385 shall be utilized to perform in-situ percolation testing in the location of proposed infiltration area treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP) and the results included as an amendment to the Final WQMP prior to issuance of the first occupancy. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD85
|
Water Quality BMPs (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | The Applicant shall select and implement treatment control BMPs that are medium to highly effective for treating Pollutants of Concern (POC) for the project. POC include project pollutants associated with a 303(d) listing or a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for receiving waters. Project pollutants of concern include: sediment/turbidity, nutrients, organic compounds, oxygen demanding substances, and pathogens. Exhibit C of the document, Riverside County Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff dated July 24, 2006 shall be consulted for determining the effectiveness of proposed treatment BMPs. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD86
|
Water Quality BMPs (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Overall, the proposed treatment control concept is accepted as the conceptual treatment control BMP for the proposed site. The Applicant has proposed to incorporate the use of combined detention and infiltration basins with underdrain systems. Final design details of these detention and infiltration systems must be provided in the first submittal of the F-WQMP. The size of the treatment control BMP is to be determined using the procedures set forth in Exhibit C of the Riverside County Guidance Document. The Applicant acknowledges that more area than currently shown on the plans may be required to treat site runoff as required by the WQMP Guidance Document. | Construction | HF/GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
LD88
|
Water Quality BMPs (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | The Applicant shall, prior to building or grading permit closeout or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, demonstrate: a. That all structural BMPs have been constructed and installed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications; b. That all structural BMPs described in the F-WQMP have been implemented in accordance with approved plans and specifications; c. That the Applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs included in the F-WQMP, conditions of approval, and building/grading permit conditions; and d. That an adequate number of copies of the approved F-WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants of the project. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
SD4
|
Damage Repair (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Any damage to existing landscape easement areas due to project construction shall be repaired/replaced by the Developer, or Developers successors in interest, at no cost to the Moreno Valley Community Services District. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
SD12
|
Median Improvements (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | All median landscaping specified in the tentative map or in these Conditions of Approval shall be constructed pursuant to the project phasing plan dated December 10, 2008. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
TE1
|
Signal Interconnect | Install Citywide Communication System (Traffic Signal Interconnect) per City Standards along Eucalyptus Avenue and Theodore Street. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
TE7
|
Street Sweeping | Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans, the developer shall submit to the City a contract between the developer and a street sweeping company for sweeping the streets during the warranty period, for the day shown on the posted street sweeping signage. The contract shall include a contact person and phone number for said contact person. | SIP Approval |
Post-construction
only |
HF | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
TE8
|
Traffic Control Plan | Prior to issuance of a construction permit, construction traffic control plans prepared by a qualified, Registered Civil or Traffic Engineer shall be required. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
TE16
|
Signing and Striping | Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all approved signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards and the approved plans. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
TE17
|
Intersection and Roadway Improvements | Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 1, the project applicant shall construct the intersection/roadway improvements identified in TE11, TE12, and TE13 per the approved plans. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
TE19
|
Driveways | Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project, driveway access at the following locations will be installed as follows: a) The easternmost driveway: full access; b) The second driveway from the east: right-in, right-out access by means of a raised median; c) The third driveway from the east (employee parking lot): full access; d) The second driveway from the west: right-in, right-out by means of a raised median; e) The westernmost driveway: full access; f) Additional driveways for Phases 2 and 3 shall be reviewed at the time of their entitlement, and conditions of approval shall be prepared as necessary regarding access. NOTE: All truck driveways shall have curb return radii of 50 feet. | Occupancy | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
TE20
|
Traffic Control, Signing/Striping | Prior to the acceptance of streets into the City-maintained road system, all approved traffic control and signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards and the approved plans. | Acceptance of Streets | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Parks(b)
|
Contractor Licenses (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | The General Contractor shall be a State of California Class A General Engineering Contractor, per the Business and Professions Code Section 7056, or a combination of State of California Class C licenses for which the work is being performed. Licenses must be current and in good standing, for the duration of the project. | General | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Parks(f)
|
Trail Grading (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Grading certification and compaction tests for trails and bikeways are required, prior to any trail or bikeway improvements being installed. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Parks(m)
|
Trail Staking (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | The trail and bikeway shall be surveyed and staked by the developer. The trail shall be inspected and approved by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee prior to the commencement of related work. | Grading | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Parks(n)
|
Trail Damage (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Any damage to bikeways, trails, or fencing during construction shall be repaired by the developer and inspected by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee; prior to Certificate of Occupancy. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Parks(o)
|
Trail Accesses (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Concrete access areas to trails with decomposed granite surfaces shall be rough finished concrete (typically tine finish). The access shall extend to the main trail flat surface. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Parks(s)
|
Landscape Damage (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Any damage to existing landscape or hardscape areas due to project construction shall be repaired/replaced by the developer, or developers successors in interest, at no cost to the City or Community Services District. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Parks(t)
|
Parks Inspections (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | All inspections shall be requested two (2) working days in advance from the Parks and Community Services Department at the time of rough and precise grading; fence and gate installation; curb and drainage; flatwork; D.G. installation; graffiti coating; and final inspection. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
PD1
|
Site Fencing (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to the start of any construction, temporary security fencing shall be erected. The fencing shall be a minimum of six (6) feet high with locking, gated access and shall remain through the duration of construction. Security fencing is required if there is: construction, unsecured structures, unenclosed storage of materials and/or equipment, and/or the condition of the site constitutes a public hazard as determined by the Public Works Department. If security fencing is required, it shall remain in place until the project is completed or the above conditions no longer exist. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
PD2
|
Project Signage (This condition is in both TPM and Plot Plan) | Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a temporary project identification sign shall be erected on the site in a secure and visible manner. The sign shall be conspicuously posted at the site and remain in place until occupancy of the project. The sign shall include the following: a. The name (if applicable) and address of the development. b. The developers name, address, and a 24-hour emergency telephone number. | Grading | HF/GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
|
Plot Plan Conditions of Approval | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P11
|
Drainage | Prior to the issuance of any grading permits and prior to any physical disturbance of any natural drainage course, for any area determined to contain riparian vegetation, the applicant shall obtain a stream bed alteration agreement or permit, or a written waiver of the requirement for such an agreement or permit, from both the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Written verification of such a permit or waiver shall be provided to the Community Development DepartmentPlanning Division and the Public Works DepartmentLand Development Division. | Grading |
For GC info
only.
All permits by HF. |
HF/GC | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
P29
|
Completion of Improvements | Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy or building final, all required landscaping, buildings, lighting, parking lot improvements including, but limited to paving and striping, and irrigation shall be installed for the required phase. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P30
|
Fences and Walls | Prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy or building final, all required and proposed fences and walls shall be constructed and installed for the required phase according to the approved plans on file in the Community Development DepartmentPlanning Division. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P31
|
Landscape Review | Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all required landscaping and irrigation, including basins, shall be reviewed by the Community Development Department Planning Division. The landscaping shall be installed for the required phase in accordance with the Citys Landscape Standards the approved landscape plans, and conditions of approval included in the grading and building sections above. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P35
|
Construction Lighting | MM A-1 During project construction, the construction site manager or supervisor shall ensure that construction lighting shall be limited to lighting within the work area and light trespass shall be avoided through directional lighting, shielding, and other similar control measures. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P38
|
Low Emission Construction | MM AQ-2 The project applicant shall meet CARB standards by assuring use of lowest emission construction equipment reasonably available for use on this project. The construction fleet average shall meet or exceed Tier II level and the applicant shall project incentives in the bidding process in selecting constructions contractors that propose the lowest-emission construction equipment (i.e., high pressure injectors; smaller engine sizes; electric equipment; gasoline powered equipment with catalytic converters; and alternatively fueled construction equipment). The applicant shall also provide incentives in the bidding process in selecting grading and construction contractors that propose the use of equipment using Level III diesel particulate filters. | Construction | GC will use Level III diesel particulate filters if available. | GC | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
P39
|
Equipment Maintenance | MM AQ-3 During project construction, construction equipment shall be properly maintained in accordance with manufacturers specifications; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines. During maintenance, precautions shall be taken to ensure that fuel is not leaked onto the ground. Equipment maintenance records and equipment design specification data sheets shall be kept onsite during construction and subject to inspection by the SCAQMD. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P40
|
Equipment Idling | MM AQ-4 During project construction, the project applicant shall require all contractors to turn off all construction equipment and delivery vehicles when not in use or prohibit idling in excess of five (5) minutes. | Construction | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
P41
|
Traffic Control | MM AQ-5 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide a traffic control plan to the City of Moreno Valley that will describe in detail safe detours around the project construction site with temporary traffic control (e.g., flag person) during construction-related truck hauling activities, as required by the City. Construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system shall be minimized by scheduling such activities to off-peak hours. Construction truck travel shall be routed to minimize travel on congested streets and near to sensitive receptor areas. Construction traffic shall gain access to the project site via Theodore Street and Eucalyptus Avenue to the greatest extent possible to minimize traffic and dust along Redlands Boulevard. The traffic control plan is primarily intended as a safety measure but also can minimize traffic congestion and delays that increase idling and acceleration emissions. The traffic control plan shall be prepared in accordance with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highways Administration Rule on Work Zone Safety 23 CFR 630 Subpart J. Developing and Implementing Traffic Management Plans for Work Zones. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P43
|
Carpooling | MM AQ-7A Construction Phases. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley indicating that construction workers will be encouraged to carpool to the greatest extent practical, including providing information on park and ride programs available to workers. The project shall also provide for lunch services onsite during construction to minimize the need for offsite vehicle trips. Workers shall be informed in writing and a letter placed on file at the City of Moreno Valley documenting the efforts to encourage carpooling. | Grading | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P45
|
Electric Hook-ups | MM AQ-8 During project construction, onsite electrical hook-ups shall be provided for electric construction tools including saws, drills and compressors, to minimize the need for diesel powered electric generators. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P46
|
Rumble Strips | MM AQ-9 During project construction, rumble or bumper strips or similar best management practices shall be provided where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads, or wash off trucks or any equipment leaving the site with each trip. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P47
|
Offsite Construction Hours | MM AQ-10 Offsite construction improvements shall be limited to an 8-hour day during daylight hours. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P55
|
Food Service | MM AQ-18. Food services shall be provided onsite. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P64
|
Archaeology | MM CR-2. Project-related archaeological monitoring shall include the following constraints: 1) All construction-related earthmoving shall be monitored to a depth of ten (10) feet below grade by the Project Archaeologist or his/her designated representative; 2) Once 50 percent of the earth to be moved has been examined by the Project Archaeologist, the Project Archaeologist may, at his or her discretion, terminate monitoring if and only if no buried cultural resources have been detected; 3) If buried cultural resources are detected during monitoring, monitoring must continue until 100 percent of virgin earth within the study area has been disturbed and inspected by the Project Archaeologist or his/her designated representative; 4) Grading shall cease in the area of a cultural artifact or potential cultural artifact as delineated by the Project Archaeologist or his/her designated representative. Grading should continue in other areas of the site while particular find are investigated; and 5) If cultural artifacts are uncovered during grading, they shall be examined by a professional archaeologist subject to MM CR-3, and decisions shall be made as to mitigation, treatment and/or disposition in consultation with the culturally affiliated Tribe(s), as determined by the City. A mitigation-monitoring report must accompany the artifacts. | Grading | HF/GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
P65
|
Cultural Resources | MM CR-3. Should buried prehistoric cultural resources be encountered during monitoring, the resources shall be evaluated for significance in consultation with the culturally affiliated Tribe(s), as determined by the City, following CEQA Guidelines prior to continuance of grading in the area. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P67
|
Paleontology | MM CR-5. (GP) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a City-approved Project Paleontologist shall be retained to initiate and supervise paleontological mitigation-monitoring in all areas of the project, subject to certain constraints found below: | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
1) Once excavations reach ten (10) feet in depth, monitoring of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontological resources by a qualified paleontological monitor or his/her representative must take place; 2) Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates; 3) Monitors shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens, and 4) Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units described herein are not present, or, if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P68
|
Discovery of Remains | MM CR-6. Although considered unlikely, there is always the possibility that ground-disturbing activities may uncover previously unknown human remains. Should this occur, Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code applies, and the following procedures shall be followed. In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, California Health & Safety Code 7050.5 and California Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project-related earthmoving begins and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken: There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until a determination as to disposition and treatment is made. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
The Riverside County Coroner shall be contacted to determine if the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours to allow the NAHC to identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD may make recommendations and enter into consultation with the landowner, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in PRC Section 5097.98. | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P69
|
Engineering Geologist | The project will be subject to the Citys Grading Ordinance and all applicable California Building Codes. MM GEO-1. During excavation and grading activities a qualified engineering geologist shall observe the in-grading excavation to confirm the absence of any fault features within the building site. If any currently unknown fault features are observed, such features shall be evaluated by the geologist and, if determined necessary, remediation measures or other measures as appropriate shall be implemented to address such features in accordance with applicable City and State requirements. The geologists record of observations shall be summarized in a final report to be submitted to the City at the conclusion of excavation/grading activities. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P75
|
Redlands Boulevard
Restrictions |
MM N-1 No construction Vehicles on Redlands Boulevard south of Future Eucalyptus Avenue. Other than construction vehicles necessary for identified offsite improvements within Redlands Boulevard, no construction vehicles shall be allowed in the vicinity of any residences on Redlands Boulevard south of exiting Fir/future Eucalyptus Avenue. The prohibition for construction traffic shall apply to all phases of the proposed project. | Construction | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
P76
|
Nighttime Grading Restrictions | MM N-2 No nighttime grading or construction within 1,200 Feet of Residences south of Future Eucalyptus Avenue. City grading hours are from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday. No grading or construction activities shall occur at night (8 p.m. to 7 a.m.) within 1,200 feet from any noise-sensitive land uses (i.e. occupied residences including yard areas, schools, etc.) located south of SR-60 (Exhibit 5.11-6 shows the current location of occupied residences). Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall submit a Noise Reduction Compliance Plan (NRCP) to the City as part of the grading permit submittal showing the limits of nighttime construction based on the location of occupied residential dwellings and their associated parcels, and other noise sensitive uses. The limits of nighttime grading or construction shall be shown on the NRCP and grading plan submitted to the City. The limits of construction allowed at night shall be staked or posted on site, and contractors will be provided with a copy of the plan showing the limits of nighttime construction. In the event any new residential units or other noise sensitive land uses are built and occupied in the vicinity of the project site prior to completion of Phase 1 construction, nighttime construction and grading activities shall be prohibited within 1,200 feet of such residences. Compliance shall be demonstrated through a modification of the NRCP. With the implementation of this mitigation measure, the loudest noise level that would be experienced at any developed residential parcel would be less than 55 dBA (Leq) during the nighttime, and this level would be consistent with the limits established in the Citys Noise Ordinance. Compliance with these standards during Phase 1 construction of the project should be assured through the Noise Reduction Compliance Plan (NRCP) and periodic monitoring of noise levels at developed residential parcels within 1,200 feet of the project site. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P77
|
Daytime Construction Noise | MM N-3 Daytime Construction Noise. City grading hours are from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday. If project site grading activities must occur within 560 fee of noise-sensitive land uses during the daytime (7 a.m. to 8 p.m.), then temporary sound barriers of sufficient height and density to reduce daytime noise levels to 60 dBA (Leq) or less shall be placed between the grading activities and the noise-sensitive land uses. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a NRCP to the City as part of the grading permit submittal showing the limits of daytime construction based on the 560 foot setback in relation to the location of occupied residential dwellings and their associated parcels and other noise sensitive uses. In the event any new residential units or other noise sensitive land uses are built and occupied in the vicinity of the project site prior to completion of Phase 1 construction, the NRCP shall be modified to show the revised new 560 foot setback for day time construction and grading activities in relation to the new residences. With the implementation of this mitigation measure the loudest noise level that would be experienced at any developed residential parcel would be less than 60 dBA (Leq) during the daytime, and these levels would be consistent with the limits established in the Citys Noise Ordinance. Compliance with these standards during Phase 1 construction of the project should be assured through the NRCP and periodic monitoring of noise levels at developed residential parcels within 560 feet of the project site. This mitigation measure does not apply to off-site construction. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P78
|
Equipment Maintenance | MM N-4 Require Equipment Maintenance. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good working order and fitted with the appropriate silencers, mufflers or acoustic covers where applicable. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
P79
|
Material Stockpiles | MM N-5 Locate material Stockpiles 1,200 Feet from Residences south of the Freeway. Material stockpiles shall be located at least 1,200 feet from residences south of future Eucalyptus Avenue along Theodore Street and Redlands Boulevard. Remotely locating the stockpiles reduces the noise at the residences from equipment traveling to and from the stock piles and the noise that is sometimes associated with handling of material. | Grading | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
P80
|
Turn Lanes | MM TT-1. (CO) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 1, turn lanes shall be improved along Theodore Street at SR-60 and at Eucalyptus Avenue. In addition, minor pavement shall be added to the Eastbound and West bound State Route 60 Freeway ramp intersections with Theodore Street to accommodate truck turning movements. These proposed improvements should enhance safety and improve mobility between the freeway and Eucalyptus Avenue. | Occupancy | Plans by HF. Construction by GC. | HF/GC | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
P83
|
Turn Lanes | MM TT(C)-1. (CO) Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for Phase 1 of the project, turn lanes shall be provided along Theodore Street at SR-60 and at Eucalyptus Avenue. In addition, minor pavement shall be added to the Eastbound and West bound State Route 60 Freeway ramp intersections with Theodore Street to accommodate truck turning movements These proposed improvements should enhance safety and improve mobility between the freeway and Eucalyptus Avenue. | Occupancy | Plans by HF. Construction by GC. | HF/GC | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
P93
|
Biodiesel Fuel | MM GCC-7 During onsite construction phases of mass grading, fine grading, and building (excluding asphalt paving, trenching, and offsite improvements), off-road construction equipment shall use biodiesel fuel (a minimum of B20, or 20 percent of biodiesel). Construction equipment exempt from this measure include those with warranties that would be voided if B20 biodiesel fuel is used. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide documentation to the City that verifies that certain equipment are exempt; that a biodiesel supply has been secured; and that the construction contractor is aware that the use of biodiesel is required. | Grading | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F4
|
Fire Turnaround | During phased construction, dead end roadways and streets which have not been completed shall have a turn-around capable of accommodating fire apparatus. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F6
|
Emergency Fire Access | Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have an approved Fire Department emergency vehicular access road (all weather surface) capable of sustaining an imposed load of 80,000 lbs. GVW, based on street standards approved by the Public Works Director and the Fire Prevention Bureau. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F7
|
Fire Access Roads | Prior to building construction, fire lanes and fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less the twenty-four (24) or thirty (30) feet as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less the thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F8
|
Road Grade | All roads, driveways and private roads shall not exceed 12 percent grade. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F9
|
Emergency | If construction is phased, each phase shall provide an approved emergency vehicular access way for fire protection prior to any building construction. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F10
|
Fire Access | Prior to construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have an approved Fire Department access based on street standards approved by the Public Works Director and the Fire Prevention Bureau. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F11
|
Fire Turnarounds | Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. | Construction | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
F14
|
Reflective Markers | Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, Blue Reflective Markers shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations in accordance with City specifications. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F15
|
Building Numbers | Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side and rear access locations. The numerals shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches in height for suite identification on a contrasting background. Unobstructed lighting of the address(s) shall be by means approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and Police Department. In multiple suite centers (strip malls), businesses shall post the name of the business on the rear door(s). | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F16
|
Fire Sprinklers | Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, the applicant/developer shall install a fire sprinkler system based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F17
|
Fire Alarm | Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, the applicant/developer shall install a fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use. Fire alarm panel shall be accessible from exterior of building in an approved location. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. | Occupancy | Flow switches by GC, Alarm System by SKX. | HF/GC/SKX | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
F18
|
Knox Box | Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, a Knox Box Rapid Entry System shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Fire Chief. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system and all exterior security emergency access gates shall be electronically operated and be provided with Knox key switches for access by emergency personnel. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F22
|
Fire Accesses | The angle of approach and departure for any means of Fire Department access shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft (0.3 m drop in 6 m), and the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the Fire Department shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F23
|
Paved Access | Prior to issuance of the building permit for development, independent paved access to the nearest paved road, maintained by the City shall be designed and constructed by the developer within the public right of way in accordance with City Standards. | Construction | Compliance with the Fire Access Plan satisfies this condition. | GC | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
F26
|
Fire Safety | Approval of the safety precautions required for buildings being constructed, altered or demolished shall be required by the Fire Chief in addition to other approvals required for specific operations or processes associated with such construction, alteration or demolition. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F29
|
Fire Inspections | Construction or work for which the Fire Prevention Bureaus approval is required shall be subject to inspection by the Fire Chief and such construction or work shall remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until approved. | Construction | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
F30
|
Fire Inspections | The Fire Prevention Bureau shall maintain the authority to inspect, as often as necessary, buildings and premises, including such other hazards or appliances designated by the Fire Chief for the purpose of ascertaining and causing to be corrected any conditions which would reasonably tend to cause fire or contribute to its spread, or any violation of the purpose or provisions of this code and of any other law or standard affecting fire safety. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
F35
|
Median Breaks | Prior to Certificate of Occupancy all locations where medians are constructed and prohibit vehicular ingress/egress into or away from the site, provisions must be made to construct a median-crossover at all locations determined by the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer. Prior to the construction, design plans will be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and all applicable inspections conducted by Land Development Division. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD39
|
Partial Pad Certification | The developer shall coordinate with Land Development staff to facilitate partial pad certification in conjunction with construction sequencing as approved by the City Engineer. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LD52
|
Caltrans Property | Not withstanding what is shown on the tentative parcel map and grading plan, no grading on Caltrans property shall be permitted without an encroachment permit. | Grading | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
TE17
|
Intersection/Roadway
Improvements |
Each gated entrance shall be provided with the following, or as approved by the City Traffic Engineer: a) A storage lane with a minimum of 75 feet queuing length for entering traffic; b) Appropriate signing and striping; c) The employee gated entrance along Eucalyptus Avenue shall remain open for a half hour prior to and a half hour after a shift change. | Occupancy | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Settlement Agreement Terms | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2
|
Tier II/Tier Ill Equipment | Highland Fairview shall include a requirement in the contract with the general contractor for the Project that all off-road equipment with a horsepower rating of 25 hp or greater used on the Project Site during the construction of the Project will meet a minimum Tier II rating and at least 80% of such equipment will meet a minimum Tier III rating and that the general contractor certify that this requirement has been satisfied. Highland Fairview shall provide a copy of the certification to the Sierra Club upon receipt of the certification from the general contractor. | Contract | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3
|
Diesel-powered portable
generators prohibited |
Highland Fairview shall include a requirement in the contract with the general contractor for the Project that diesel-powered portable generators not be used during the construction of the Project. | Contract | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
4b
|
Energy Demand Documents | Provide the City and the Sierra Club with the appropriate design documents demonstrating that the electrical energy demand of the 50,000 sq. ft. office portion of the Skechers Building will be met by the solar cells to be mounted on the roof of the Skechers Building. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
4c
|
Roof Design | Design and construct the roof of the Skechers Building to accommodate the maximum number of solar cells. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
5
|
Solar Water Heaters | Highland Fairview shall provide solar water heaters, which may include supplemental conventional heating sources, throughout the Project for all personal uses, such as bathrooms and showers, but not for industrial uses. | Construction | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
6
|
Signage | Highland Fairview shall provide the signs required by Mitigation measure AQ-11 at locations, and of a size, to be easily readable from future Eucalyptus Avenue. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
8
|
On-Site Signage | Highland Fairview shall provide on-site signs directing large trucks (over 10,000 pounds) will be required to make a left turn, towards Theodore Street, when exiting the Project Site unless prohibited by the City from doing so. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
9
|
Median | Highland Fairview shall provide the landscaped median in Eucalyptus Avenue between Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street in substantially the form currently planned, as shown on Exhibit A, subject to final approval by the City. | Occupancy | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
13
|
LEED | The Skechers Building has been designed with the goal of achieving LEED silver certification. Highland Fairview shall seek to obtain the highest commercially reasonable level of LEED certification of the Skechers Building and shall, in any event, take all of the actions set forth on Exhibit B. As used in this Agreement, commercially reasonable shall mean that the actions involved are capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time taking into account economic and other circumstances that would be considered by a prudent commercial entity. | LEED Certification | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
15
|
Driveway Design | To the extent consistent with the Project Approvals and adopted City regulations and policies: a. The design and installation of improvements and signs shall direct all large trucks (over 10,000 pounds) to use Theodore Street, rather than Redlands Boulevard, when entering or leaving the Project Site unless the site-specific traffic analysis required prior to the approval of a plot plan for Phase III (Condition TE3 of the Project Approvals, City Council Resolution 2009-10) provides compelling evidence that: (i) Keeping large trucks (over 10,000 pounds) off of Redlands Boulevard will cause Eucalyptus Avenue, Theodore Street or its on- or off-ramps to State Route 60 to fall below the Citys Level of Service Standard; and (ii) mitigation within the limits of the currently planned right-of-way of Theodore Street is unavailable to improve the Level of Service to acceptable levels: | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
and (iii) Allowing large trucks (over 10,000 pounds) to use Redlands Boulevard will not cause Redlands Boulevard to fall below the applicable Citys Level of Service Standards after mitigation. b. To the extent that any part of subparagraph a above is found not to be consistent with existing Project Approvals or City regulations or policies, Highland Fairview shall apply for and the City will consider, under its existing procedures and preserving the Councils legislative and discretionary policy authority, modifications of conditions, and/or amendments to existing Project Approvals, regulations and policies. | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
LEED Projected Certification Items | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Construction Waste Management | The project will recycle and/or salvage a minimum of 50% (by weight) of non-hazardous construction and demolition debris. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Recycled Content | The project will use materials with recycled content such that the sum of post-consumer recycled content plus one-half of the pre-consumer content constitutes at least 10% (cost-base) on the total value of the materials in the project. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Regional Materials | The project will use building materials or products that have been extracted, harvested or recovered, as well as manufactured, within 500 miles of the project site for a minimum of 10% (cost-based) of the total materials value. | Construction | GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Increased Ventilation | The project will develop and implement an Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Management Plan for the construction and pre-occupancy phases of the building. | Construction | GC |
No. | General Description | Actual Text | Timing | Status | Notes | Resp. | ||||||
|
Innovation in Design | The project will utilize locally-sourced concrete and interior fixtures providing a 50% water use savings. | Construction | HF/GC | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
75% of Construction Waste Salvaged or Recycled | The project will salvage or recycle as much construction waste as is feasible, but in no case less than 50% by weight of such waste. The project will utilize recycled (crushed) concrete during construction for temporary access roads and for paving base where acceptable. The project is directing green waste from clearing operations during construction, to a location for mulching and will be re-used. | Construction | GC |
1
2
3
4
6
Sierra Club Environmental Law Program:
|
85 Second Street | |
|
San Francisco, CA 94105 | |
|
Aaron.Isherwood@sierraclub.org |
7
Sierra Club, San Gorgonio Chapter:
|
Chapter Chair/Conservation Chair | |
|
4079 Mission Inn Avenue | |
|
Riverside, CA 92501-3204 | |
|
san.gorgonio.chapter@sierraclub.org | |
|
||
Sierra Club, Moreno Valley Group:
|
Ann Turner-McKibben and George | |
|
Hague | |
|
P.O. Box 1325 | |
|
Moreno Valley, CA 92556-1325 | |
|
morenovalleygroup@yahoo.com | |
|
||
with a copy to Raymond W. Johnson, Esq.:
|
Johnson & Sedlack | |
|
26785 Camino Seco | |
|
Temecula, CA 92590 | |
|
esqaicp@wildblue.net | |
|
||
The City attention of the City Manager,
|
||
w/ copy attention of the City Attorney:
|
14177 Frederick Street | |
|
P.O. Box 88005 | |
|
Moreno Valley, CA 92552 | |
|
CMOffice@moval.org | |
|
CityAttorney@moval.org | |
|
||
Highland Fairview:
|
14225 Corporate Way | |
|
Moreno Valley, CA 92553 | |
|
ibenzeevi@highlandfairview.com | |
|
||
with a copy to Kenneth B. Bley, Esq.:
|
Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP | |
|
2049 Century Park East, 28th Floor, | |
|
Los Angeles CA 90067 | |
|
kbley@coxcastle.com |
8
9
January 7, 2010 |
SIERRA CLUB
|
|||
By: | [ILLEGIBLE] | |||
Its: CHAPTER CHAIR, SAN GORGONIO CHAPTER | ||||
January 11, 2010 |
THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
|
|||
By: | [ILLEGIBLE] | |||
Its: MAYOR | ||||
January 7, 2010 |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS I
By: HFP Realty Investment, LP, its Managing Partner By: HFP Realty Holdings, LLC, its General Partner |
|||
By: | /s/ Iddo Benzeevi | |||
Its: President | ||||
January 7, 2010 |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS II
By: New Sands Holdings, LP, its Managing Partner By: Sand Holdings, LLC, its General Partner |
|||
By: | /s/ Iddo Benzeevi | |||
Its: President | ||||
January 7, 2010 |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS III
By: HFP Realty Investment, LP, its Managing Partner By: HFP Realty Holdings, LLC, its General Partner |
|||
By: | /s/ Iddo Benzeevi | |||
Its: President | ||||
10
January 7, 2010 |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS IV
By: Sinclair Holdings, LP, its Managing Partner By: Sinclair Realty Holdings, LLC, its General Partner |
|||
By: | Iddo Benzeevi | |||
Its: President | ||||
January 7, 2010 |
HF LOGISTICS I, LLC
|
|||
By: | Iddo Benzeevi | |||
Its: President | ||||
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
January 11, 2010 |
JOHNSON & SEDLACK |
|||
By: | /s/ Raymond W. Johnson | |||
Raymond W. Johnson | ||||
Attorneys for the SIERRA CLUB | ||||
January 11, 2010 |
CITY ATTORNEY
OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY |
|||
By: | [ILLEGIBLE] | |||
Its: INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY | ||||
January 7, 2010 |
COX CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP
|
|||
By: | /s/ Kenneth B. Bley | |||
Kenneth B. Bley | ||||
Attorneys for HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS I; HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS, II, HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS, III, HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PARTNERS, IV and HF LOGISTICS I, LLC |
11
| Alternative Transportation: |
Bicycle Storage & Changing
Rooms
The project will provide secure bicycle racks within 200 yards of the building entrances for 5 % or more of all building users and will provide shower and changing facilities in the building for 0.5 % of full-time equivalent occupants. Low Emission and Fuel Efficient Vehicles The project will provide preferred parking for low-emission and fuel efficient vehicles for 5% of the total vehicle parking capacity of the site. Parking Capacity The project will meet, but not exceed the number of parking stalls required by the local zoning requirements and will provide preferred parking for carpools and vanpools for 5% of the total parking spaces. |
Site Development: |
Maximum Open Space
As approved by the City of Moreno Valley, the project will provide vegetated open space within the project boundary in accordance with the local zonings open space requirement. |
| Storm Water Design: |
Quality Control
Highland Fairview will implement the City approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). |
| Heat Island Effect: |
Roof
The project will use roofing materials having a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) equal to or greater than 78 for a minimum of 75% of the roof surface. |
| Water Efficient Landscaping: |
The project will reduce potable water consumption for irrigation by 50% from a calculated mid-summer baseline case. |
1 of 5
| Water Use Reduction: |
Reduce Water Usage by 30%
|
|||
The project will employ strategies that in aggregate use 30% less water than the water use baseline calculated for the building (not including irrigation). |
| Optimize Energy Performance: |
The project will demonstrate a percentage improvement in the proposed building performance rating compared to the baseline building performance rating. |
| On-Site Renewable Energy: |
The project will use on-site renewable energy systems (solar) to offset a portion of building energy cost. |
| Enhanced Commissioning: |
The project began the commissioning process during the design process and will execute additional activities after systems performance verification is completed. |
| Construction Waste Management: |
The project will recycle and/or salvage a minimum of 50% (by weight) of non-hazardous construction and demolition debris. |
| Recycled Content: |
The project will use materials with recycled content such that the sum of post-consumer recycled content plus one-half of the pre-consumer content constitutes at least 10% (cost-based) on the total value of the materials in the project. |
| Regional Materials: |
The project will use building materials or products that have been extracted, harvested or recovered, as well as manufactured, within 500 miles of the project site for a minimum of 10% (cost-based) of the total materials value. |
2 of 5
| Increased Ventilation: |
The project will increase breathing zone outdoor air ventilation rates to all occupied spaces by at least 30% above the minimum rates required by ASHRAE Std. 62.1-2004. |
| Construction IAQ Management Plan: |
The project will develop and implement an Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Management Plan for the construction and pre-occupancy phases of the building. |
| Low Emitting Materials: |
The project will utilize only those paints and coatings that comply with Credit 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 of the LEED standards. |
| Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control: |
The project will provide entryway systems to reduce the infiltration of dirt and particulates into the indoor environment. Separate ventilation systems will be provided for storage areas for hazardous chemicals in order to minimize and control pollutants in the building. |
| Daylight and Views: |
The project, will achieve day-lighting via skylights for building occupants in 75% of all regularly occupied areas. |
| Innovation In Design: |
The project will utilize locally-sourced concrete and interior fixtures providing a 40% water use savings. |
| LEED Accredited Professional: |
At least one principal participant of the project team is a LEED Accredited Professional (AP). |
3 of 5
| Use of More Shade Trees vs. Palm Trees to Reduce Temperature |
As shown in the City-approved Plot Plan package, palm trees used on the site will be located at the buildings primary entry as part of the decorative entry treatment, and along the freeway, near gates and building corners as accent elements. All other trees on the site, in the parking areas, adjacent to the building, in the landscape areas, and along the freeway will be varieties of shade trees. |
| Waterless Urinals |
Use of these products was investigated but ultimately rejected based upon marginal performance and excessive maintenance costs. Very low flow urinals will be used in the facility which will provide a 30% reduction in water use over typical low-flow urinals. |
| Automatic turn on and off for lavatory faucetsonly allow 1 / 2 gal per minute |
These products will be installed throughout the building. |
| Monitoring system that keeps track of all systems so that response can be quick if one of the systems does not function properly |
The Skechers building will include a building systems monitoring program which will immediately notify maintenance personnel of any system malfunction. |
| Photo Sensors for Lighting |
Motion sensors will be installed in the office areas of the building to turn off all lighting (except security lighting) when theses areas of the building are not occupied. A network of thousands of roof-mounted skylights will provide substantial natural light in the warehouse areas. Sensors will be installed in the warehouse areas to automatically turn off artificial area lighting when ambient light is adequate. |
| Reduce carpet and flooring glue toxics by environmentally friendly carpet and non toxic glue. |
Low VOC carpeting, paint and adhesives will be used throughout the building. Polished concrete flooring will replace vinyl flooring originally |
4 of 5
planned for the warehouse restrooms, break rooms and shipping/receiving areas. |
| Recycle of All Used Materials |
Recycling bins will be provided at the site for recycling during the operation of the building. Recycling of construction waste will be required to the greatest degree practicable. Skechers currently bundles and recycles all cardboard waste and will provide recycling bins for employee use throughout the facility. Skechers is exploring opportunities for recycling (mulching) of damaged wood pallets. |
| 75% of Construction Waste Salvaged or Recycled |
The project will salvage or recycle as much construction waste as is feasible, but in no case less that 50% by weight of such waste. The project will utilize recycled (crushed) concrete during construction for temporary access roads and for paving base where acceptable. The project is directing green waste from clearing operations during construction, to a location for mulching and will be re-used. |
| Independent Venting for Toxic Places |
The storage of toxic materials, as identified by the State of California, will be in accordance with all applicable building code requirements including the independent venting of such storage areas. |
| Thermal Controls in Various Work Spaces |
The warehouse area is not heated or cooled, utilizing a controlled air exchange system to moderate interior temperatures. The office and commercial areas will be served by a number of HVAC zones each with its own controls. The units are equipped with an automatic time switch with an accessible manual override that allows operation of the system during off-hours. |
| The building occupant/owner must share whole-project energy and water usage data for at least five years with the US Green Building Council or Green Building Certification Institute. |
Highland Fairview will provide all documentation used to secure LEED certification, including any tenant operational documentation. Such documentation requirements will be addressed in the lease documents. |
5 of 5
1
2
1. | The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify that the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Highland Fairview Corporate Park Project on file with the Community and Development Department, incorporated herein by this reference, has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR and that the final EIR reflects the Citys independent judgment and analysis; and | ||
2. | The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council hereby adopt the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the final EIR for the Highland Fairview Corporate Park Project, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and | ||
3. | The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council hereby approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the final EIR for the proposed Highland Fairview Corporate Park project, attached hereto as Exhibit B. |
3
/s/ Richard A. Stewart
|
/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
|
/s/ Robert D. Herrick
|
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
) | |||||
|
||||||
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
|
) | ss. | ||||
|
||||||
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
|
) |
AYES:
|
Council Members Batey, Hastings, Molina, Mayor Pro Tem Flickinger and Mayor Stewart | |
|
||
NOES:
|
None | |
|
||
ABSENT:
|
None | |
|
||
ABSTAIN:
|
None |
/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
|
||
|
||
(SEAL)
|
5
I. | INTRODUCTION |
II. | PROJECT SUMMARY | |
A. | PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
6
B. | PROJECT OBJECTIVES |
1. | Perform construction in an accelerated manner in order to meet Skechers occupancy needs; | |
2. | Provide additional employment opportunities; | |
3. | Provide logistic facilities in a single building containing at least 1,800,000 sf to allow for the consolidation of several existing Skechers logistics facilities into one; | |
4. | Plan for, and entitle, the Project Site to allow for the possibility of adding another building containing up to 600,000 sf to account for future growth in the need for logistics facilities; | |
5. | Provide logistics facilities on land with immediate access to State Route-60 to minimize the use of City streets; | |
6. | Provide the City with new jobs and revenues from the construction and operation of the logistics facilities; | |
7. | Construct the logistics facilities in a manner that maximizes the use of green technology; and | |
8. | Develop the Project Site to ensure an adequate rate of return on the Project applicants investment. | |
III. | ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
7
1. | Prepared and distributed an Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, dated October 29, 2007, a copy of which was circulated the following day through the State Clearinghouse to various state agencies for their comments; | ||
2. | Sent the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, which contained the notice of a scoping meeting to be held on November 26, 2007, to each of the governmental agencies, organizations and individuals shown on the distribution list for the Notice of Preparation/Initial Study, Appendix A to the Draft EIR, on October 29, 2007; | ||
3. | Held a public scoping meeting on November 26, 2007, to solicit comments from the public on what should be analyzed in the EIR; | ||
4. | Sent a Notice of Completion and a copy of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse on August 4, 2008; | ||
5. | Filed a Notice of Availability with the Clerk of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 4, 2008, informing the public that the Draft EIR was available for public review for a 45 day period beginning on August 6, 2008, and ending on September 19, 2008; | ||
6. | Mailed the Notice of Availability to all organizations and individuals who had previously requested the Notice on August 4, 2008; | ||
7. | Mailed the Notice of Availability to all residents and property owners within 300 feet of the Project Site on August 4, 2008; | ||
8. | Provided copies of the Draft EIR to 132 public agencies, organizations and individuals on August 4, 2008; | ||
9. | Placed copies of the Draft EIR on the Citys website, at the Citys Planning Departments public counter and at the public library located at 25480 Alessandro Boulevard on August 4, 2008; | ||
10. | Published the Notice of Availability on August 8, 2008, in the Press Enterprise, which is the newspaper of general circulation which has the largest circulation in the areas affected by the Project; | ||
11. | Prepared responses to comments on the Draft EIR received during and after the 45 day comment period on the Draft EIR, which have been included in the Final EIR; |
8
12. | Published a Notice on December 19, 2008, in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation which has the largest circulation in the areas affected by the Project, that the Citys Planning Commission would hold a public hearing on January 8, 2009, to consider the Final EIR and the Project in order to provide recommendations to the Council; | ||
13. | Sent copies of the Final EIR on December 19, 2008, to all public agencies, organizations and individuals who had submitted comments; | ||
14. | Held a public hearing of the Citys Planning Commission to consider the adequacy of the Final EIR on January , 2009, and, at the conclusion of the hearing, recommended that the Council certify that the Final EIR had been prepared in full compliance with CEQA; | ||
15. | Published a notice on January , 2009, in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation which has the largest circulation in the areas affected by the Project, that the Council would hold a public hearing on January , 2009, to consider certification of the Final EIR as having been prepared in compliance with CEQA and the approval of the Project; | ||
16. | Mailed notice of the Councils hearing to all residents and property owners within 300 feet of the Project Site on January , 2009; | ||
17. | Sent notice of the Councils hearing to all organizations and individuals who had previously requested notification of anything having to do with the Project on January , 2009; and | ||
18. | Held a public hearing of the Council on January , 2009, and, after full consideration of all comments, written and oral, certified that the Final EIR had been completed in compliance with CEQA and approval of the Project. |
A. | INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT FINDING |
Finding: | The Final EIR for the Project reflects the Citys and the Councils independent judgment and analysis. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
The EIR was prepared by Michael Brandman Associates, an independent consulting firm, under the supervision and direction of Planning Division staff of |
9
|
the Citys Community Development Department and was thoroughly reviewed by the Chambers Group, an expert consultant hired by the City to provide independent peer review and assure the exercise of thorough and independent review and judgment by the City. The Council, as the Citys final decision making body for the Project, received and reviewed the Final EIR and the comments, both written and oral, provided by public agencies and members of the public prior to certifying that the Final EIR complied with CEQA. The participation of City Staff in selection and approval of Michael Brandman Associates as the EIR Consultant, the professional qualifications and reputation of the EIR Consultant, the supervision and direction of the EIR Consultant by the City Staff, the thorough and independent review of the Draft and Final EIRs, including comments and responses to comments, by both the City Staff and the Chambers Group and the review and careful consideration by the City Council of the Final EIR, comments and responses to comments all conclusively show that the Final EIR is the product of and reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City as the Lead Agency, and of the City Council as its governing body. |
B. | FINDING OF THE ABSENCE OF ANY NEED TO RECIRCULATE THE FINAL EIR |
Finding: | The Council finds that the Final EIR does not add significant new information to the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the Project EIR. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
The Council recognizes that the Final EIR incorporates information obtained and produced after the Draft EIR was completed and that the Final EIR contains additions, clarifications and minor modifications to the Draft EIR. The Council has reviewed and considered the Final EIR and all of the information contained in it and has determined that the new information added to the Final EIR does not involve a new significant environmental impact, a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact nor a feasible |
10
|
mitigation measure or an alternative considerably different from others previously analyzed that the Project applicant declined to adopt and that would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the Project. No information provided to the Council indicates that the Draft EIR was inadequate or conclusory or that the public was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to review and comment on the Draft EIR. |
C. | GENERAL TREATMENT OF MITIGATION MEASURES |
IV. | ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND FINDINGS |
11
A. | IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR AS LESS THEN SIGNIFICANT REQUIRING NO MITIGATION |
1. | AESTHETICS |
|
a. | Potential Significant Impact: | Damage to scenic resources (Impact 5.1-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings and historic buildings visible from a State scenic highway. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed in Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the Draft EIR and as shown in the Aesthetics Assessment, Appendix M.1 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site is flat, having been used for farming in the past and contains no trees, rock outcroppings or historic buildings within any State scenic highway. |
|
b. | Potential Significant Impact: | Degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the Project Site and its surroundings (Impact 5.1-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the Project Site or its surroundings. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.1-25-26 of the Draft EIR, the development of the Project will introduce urban development into an area of the City that has historically been used for ranching and agricultural purposes. However, the Citys General Plan has identified the Project Site for business park and commercial development with the recognition that the visual attributes of the Project Site will change. That change is a continuation of planned development that is visually compatible with the proposed future urbanization of the area surrounding the Project Site. |
2. | AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES |
|
a. | Potential Significant Impact: | Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract (Impact 5.2-2) |
Finding: | The Project does not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. |
12
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.2-5 of the Draft EIR and in the Agricultural Resources Report and Land Evaluation and Site Assessment and the Agricultural Impact Evaluation, Appendices B.1 and B.2 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site is zoned as Business Park and Commercial and is not subject to a Williamson Act contract. |
|
b. | Potential Significant Impact: | Conversion of other farmland to nonagricultural use (Impact 5.2-3) |
Finding: | The Project will cause changes in the existing environment which could result in the conversion of other farmland to nonagricultural use. However, such changes will not rise to a level of significance because the surrounding farmland is designated for development in the Citys General Plan and is not suitable for farming in the long term in any event. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.2-6 of the Draft EIR and in the Agricultural Resources Report and Land Evaluation and Site Assessment and the Agricultural Impact Evaluation, Appendices B.1 and B.2 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site and the area surrounding the Project Site are vacant and, in the past, have been used for dry land farming. However, the development of the Project would not, by itself, in any way limit the use of adjacent land for agricultural purposes. Moreover, the surrounding land is designated for urban use with the understanding that whatever limited agricultural use now exists will not continue to exist for much longer. | |
|
Moreover, as discussed on pages 5.2-1 and -6-7 of the Draft EIR and in the Agricultural Resources Report and Land Evaluation and Site Assessment and the Agricultural Impact Evaluation, Appendices B.1 and B.2 to the Draft EIR, the Citys General Plan recognizes that farming has become less economically viable because of the high cost of water, the cost of land and property taxes, conflicts with surrounding urban uses and the lack of agri-business support in the area. Although land near the Project Site does contain land which has been identified by the California Department of Conservation as suitable for farming, the absence of an agricultural infrastructure crop managers, labor, farm implements and processing |
13
|
facilities in the vicinity, the cost of bringing suitable water to the Project Site, the cost of the water itself and the fact that the sale of the products which could be grown if water were available would not cover the costs of production means that the land near the Project Site cannot be realistically considered as an agricultural resource. |
3. | AIR QUALITY |
|
a. | Potential Significant Impact: | Conflict with, or obstruction of, implementation of the applicable air quality plan (Impact 5.3-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not conflict with, nor will it obstruct implementation of, the applicable air quality plan. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.3-22-23 of the Draft EIR and in the Air Quality and Health Risk Report, Appendix D.1 to the Draft EIR, the Project is consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District because, as set forth in Response 20-2 on page 3-94 of the Final EIR, the number of trips generated under the existing General Plan land use designation, which forms the basis for the Air Quality Management Plan, contemplates vehicle trips substantially in excess of those which will result once the Project is fully developed. |
|
b. | Potential Significant Impact: | Creation of objectionable odors (Impact 5.3-5) |
Finding: | The Project will not create objectionable odors affecting substantial numbers of people. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.3-54 of the Draft EIR and in the Air Quality and Health Risk Report, Appendix D.1 to the Draft EIR, the project will not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Diesel exhaust and volatile organic compounds would be emitted during construction and operation of the project, which may be objectionable; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site |
14
|
and therefore will not be at a level that would induce any significant negative response. |
4. | BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES |
|
a. | Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial adverse impact on habitat (Impact 5.4-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not have a substantial adverse affect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S.A. Fish and Wildlife Service. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.4-31 of the Draft EIR and in the Habitat. Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Appendix C. 1 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site does not contain any riparian habitat nor does it contain any habitat for either sensitive plants or wildlife. |
|
b. | Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial adverse effect on protected wetlands (Impact 5.4-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not have any effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.4-31 of the Draft EIR and in the Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis and the Delineation of Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands, Tentative Parcel Map No. 35629 and Associated Offsite Areas, Appendices C.1 and C.2 to the Draft EIR, there are no wetlands or wetland vegetation on the Project Site. |
|
c. | Potential Significant Impact: | Interference with migratory wildlife corridors (Impact 5.4-4) |
Finding: | The Project will not interfere with the movement of native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors nor impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. |
15
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.4-31-32 of the Draft EIR and in the Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Appendix C.1 to the Draft EIR, no wildlife movement corridors occur on, or directly adjacent to, the Project Site nor will there be any impact on native wildlife nursery sites because no such sites were observed on, or directly adjacent to, the Project Site. |
4. | GEOLOGY AND SOILS |
|
a. | Potential Significant Impact: | Exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects (Impact 5.6-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (i) rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist, for the Project Site or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; (ii) strong seismic ground shaking; (iii) seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; and (iv) landslides. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.6-1-15 and Responses 15-1-5 on pages 3-137-138 of the Final EIR and in the geotechnical studies, Appendix F to the Draft EIR, the Project Site is not located in an area that is underlain by any active fault segments although there may be unnamed fault splays nearby. The Project Site is located in an area where there is a moderate potential for liquefaction. However, liquefaction occurs only when groundwater is present within 50 feet of the surface, something which exploratory wells have shown does not occur on the Project Site. The combination of required setbacks and adherence to the structural design requirements set forth in the California Building Code means that the chances of substantial adverse effects will be no greater on the Project Site than anywhere else in Southern California. | |
|
||
|
Although no mitigation is required to reduce any significant impact, Mitigation Measure GEO-1, set forth on page 4-52 of the Final EIR, has been imposed as a condition of Project approval to ensure that any fault features found on the Project Site will be suitably dealt with. |
16
|
b. | Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil (Impact 5.6-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.6-15 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site has a gentle slope which does not have a high erosion potential. The fine sandy soil on the Site does have a potential for wind erosion but standard best management practices and air quality emission dust controls during grading will ensure that the soils are properly moistened during high wind conditions. Topsoil on the Site will be lost due to the construction of the Project. However, because the Project Site will ultimately be converted to urban uses and no longer available for agricultural production, the loss of the topsoil will not result in any significant impact. |
|
c. | Potential Significant Impact: | Unstable geologic location (Impact 5.6-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the Project and will not potentially result in on-or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.6-1-10 and 15 of the Draft EIR and in the geotechnical studies, Appendix F to the Draft EIR, and in subsection IV.4.a. above, no evidence of geologic instability underlaying the Project Site has been identified as a result of the geotechnical investigations carried out on the Site. Moreover, the development of the Project Will be subject to the Citys Grading Ordinance and the California Building Code, both of which are designed to deal with potential problems of geologic instability. |
|
d. | Potential Significant Impact: | Location of the Project on expansive soil (Impact 5.6-4) |
Finding: | The Project will not be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), nor will it create substantial risk to life or property. |
17
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.6-16 of the Draft EIR and in the geotechnical studies, Appendix F to the Draft EIR, limited laboratory tests of the soils at the Project Site at shallow depth show that they have a low expansion potential. Moreover, the Project will be required to comply with the Citys Grading Ordinance and the California Building Code, both of which are designed to deal with the potential of expansive soils. |
|
e. | Potential Significant Impact: | Wastewater disposal systems (Impact 5.6-5) |
Finding: | Wastewater disposal will have no effect on the soils on the Project Site. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.6-16 of the Draft EIR, the Project will be connected to wastewater service provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District and no septic tanks will be used. |
|
f. | Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on geology and soils |
Finding: | Cumulative impacts on geology and soils caused by the Project, in conjunction with other development, will not be cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 6-12 of the Draft EIR, the physical development of other land will be subject to the same strict safeguards applicable to the development of the Project Site. Further, impacts to geology and soils are site specific so that a problem on one site does not contribute to problems on other sites. |
5. | HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS |
|
a. | Potential Significant Impact: | Hazardous emissions within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school (Impact 5.7-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not emit hazardous emissions nor will it handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or wastes within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.7-9 of the Draft EIR and in the letter from Jeff Hoskinson dated April 21, 2008, Appendix L to the Draft EIR, the nearest school site, the Calvary Chapel Christian School, is located |
18
|
approximately 1.3 miles northwest of the Project Site. Two school sites which had previously been considered by the Moreno Valley Unified School District within one-quarter mile of the Project Site have been abandoned. |
|
b. | Potential Significant Impact: | Safety hazard due to proximity to an airport (Impact 5.7-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the area due to the proximity of an airport or private airstrip. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.7-19 of the Draft EIR, the nearest airport or private airstrip is March Air Force Base which is located approximately 7.3 miles southwest of the Project Site. The Site is not within any airport land use plan area. |
|
c. | Potential Significant Impact: | Impairment or interference with an adopted emergency response plan (Impact 5.7-4) |
Finding: | The Projects implementation will not impair or physically interfere with any adopted emergency response plan or any emergency evacuation plan. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.7-9-10 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site is located on the Citys urban fringe and does not interfere with access to any other area. Emergency access to the Project Site will be available from both Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street along future Eucalyptus Avenue for all three Phases of the Project. |
|
d. | Potential Significant Impact: | Exposure to wildland fires (Impact 5.7-5) |
Finding: | The development of the Project will not expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.7-10 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site is located in an area which is currently undeveloped and actively dry farmed. No heavy natural vegetation exists in the area surrounding the Site, the surrounding areas cannot be characterized as wildlands nor is the Project Site located in an area identified as a high fire area by Riverside County. The |
19
|
closest high fire area is approximately eight-tenths of a mile west of the Site. |
6. | HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY |
|
a. | Potential Significant Impact: | Violation of water quality or waste discharge standards (Impact 5.8-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not violate any water quality standards nor any waste discharge standards nor will it otherwise degrade water quality. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.8-11-15 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-56-57 of the Final EIR, and in the Logistics Building Runoff Management Plan and the Project Specific Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Appendices H.1 and H.2 to the Draft EIR, the Project applicant will be required to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that conforms to the State Water Resources Control Boards National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit prior to the issuance of grading or construction permits. The SWPPP will identify best management practices to prevent construction related pollutants from reaching Stormwater and all products of erosion from moving off-site. Conformance with the mandatory requirements of the SWPPP will ensure that no substantial degradation of water quality associated with the short-term construction activities will occur. | |
|
||
|
Long-term operational stormwater quality concerns will be managed pursuant to a City approved Water Quality Management Plan for the Project Site. The Plan requires the construction of a stormwater conveyance system that will include a series of extended detention basins, which will also serve as infiltration basins, with catch basin inserts for the removal of trash. The result will be a significant reduction in pollutant loads in the Stormwater runoff from the Project Site which might otherwise reach surface water bodies. |
20
|
b. | Potential Significant Impact: | Depletion of groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge (Impact 5.8-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies nor will it interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.8-15 of the Draft EIR, and in the geotechnical studies, Appendix F to the Draft EIR, development of the Project Site will increase the amount of impervious area on the Site. However, because groundwater is located more than 110 feet below the existing ground surface, existing recharge is currently minimal. Stormwater runoff from the Project Site will be released into existing downstream drainage areas which will continue to allow runoff from the Site to percolate into the soil. |
|
c. | Potential Significant Impact: | Alteration of existing drainage patterns resulting in substantial erosion, siltation or flooding on- or off-site (Impact 5.8-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern in a manner which would result in substantial erosion, siltation or flooding on- or off-site. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.8-16-18 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-58 of the Final EIR, and in the Logistics Building Runoff Management Plan and the Project Specific Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Appendices H.1 and H.2 to the Draft EIR, the best management practices requirement of the SWPPP will ensure that runoff from the Project Site, including siltation, will be cleaned and delivered into existing off-site drainage channels in an amount which will not exceed predevelopment flows. | |
|
||
|
The Project Site is located in an area which is subject to a 500-year flood or a 100-year flood with an average flooding depth of less than one foot. The Projects detention basins will be utilized to reduce the 100-year peak storm flows to levels at or below existing peak discharges for the Project Site. Thus, the |
21
|
development of the Project will not add to the potential for flooding on- or off-site. |
|
d. | Potential Significant Impact: | Creation or contribution of runoff waters exceeding the capacity of existing or planned drainage systems or resulting in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff (Impact 5.8-4) |
Finding: | The Project will not create, nor will it contribute to, runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems nor will it provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.8-17-18 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-38 of the Final EIR, and in the Logistics Building Runoff Management Plan and the Project Specific Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Appendices H.1 and H.2 to the Draft EIR, development of the Project Site will increase the impervious surface and would, in the absence of suitable improvements, result in increased stormwater runoff. However, because of the drainage improvements discussed in Section 5.8 of the Draft EIR, stormwater runoff from the Project Site will be less than, or equal to, the peak discharges under existing conditions. Further, the Projects treatment of stormwater runoff, discussed in subsection IV.7.a. above, will ensure the absence of pollutants leaving the Project Site. |
|
e. | Potential Significant Impact: | The location of housing within a 100-year flood hazard area (Impact 5.8-5) |
Finding: | The Project will not place housing or other structures within a 100-year flood hazard area. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.8-18 of the Draft EIR, the Project will not contain any housing and the Project Site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area. |
|
f. | Potential Significant Impact: | Exposure of people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding (Impact 5.8-6) |
22
Finding: | The Project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or a dam. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.8-18 of the Draft EIR, the nearest dam is approximately five miles downstream of the Project Site so that there is no risk from dam failure. Further, there are no levees located anywhere in the vicinity of the Project Site. |
g. Potential Significant Impact: | Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mud flow (Impact 5.8-7) |
Finding: | The Project Site will not be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami or mud flow. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.8-18-19 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site is not located near the Pacific Ocean nor any large body of water. Therefore, neither tsunamis nor seiches, which are defined as standing waves in a partially enclosed body of water, present any hazard to the Project Site. Further, the Site and its surrounding vicinity is relatively flat and the nearest foothills are more than a mile away so that the potential for a mud flow affecting the Site is remote. |
h. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on hydrology and water quality |
Finding: | Cumulative impacts on hydrology and water quality caused by the Project, in conjunction with other development, will not be cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 6-14 of the Draft EIR, the EIR prepared for the Citys General Plan found that the development of the Project Site and surrounding areas has the potential to increase flooding, erosion, stormwater pollutants. These impacts will be avoided through the implementation of required Best management Practices on a project by project basis in accordance with the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination Stormwater Permit and Water Quality Management Plans. All flood control measures and infrastructure maintenance will be required to comply |
23
|
with either the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Districts or the Citys standard engineering practices. Additionally, all new development will be required to build master drainage plan facilities and/or pay fees which will be used to build them. |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Physical division of an established community (Impact 5.9-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not physically divide an established community. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.9-16 of the Draft EIR, there is no established community in the Project area at the present time. Further, the existing General Plan designates the Project Site for nonresidential development. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on land use and planning |
Finding: | Cumulative impacts on land use and planning caused by the Project, in conjunction with other development, will not be cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 6-14-16 of the Draft EIR, the changes in land use for the Project Site will produce fewer jobs than currently projected based on the development contemplated by the existing General Plan designation and zoning but will still increase the Citys job/housing ratio. Further, the impacts resulting from changes in land use are site specific so that a change of use on one site does not contribute to a change of use on other sites. |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Loss of a known valuable mineral resource (Impact 5.10-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. |
24
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.10-3 of the Draft EIR, there are no known mineral resources on the Project Site. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site (Impact 5.10-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on the Citys General Plan or any other land use plan. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.10-3 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site is not identified on any land use plan as containing any locally-important mineral resource recovery site. |
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on mineral resources |
Finding: | Cumulative impacts on mineral resources caused by the Project, in conjunction with other development, will not be cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 6-16-17 of the Draft EIR, there are no mineral resources located on the Project Site so the development of the Project will not have any impact on mineral resources. Further, impacts to mineral resources are site specific so that a problem on one site does not contribute to problems on other sites. |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Exposure of people to noise levels in excess of applicable standards or a substantial permanent noise increase in the vicinity of the Project (Impact 5.11-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not expose people to noise levels in excess of applicable standards. The Project will produce a permanent noise increase in the vicinity of the Project Site but will not result in any significant impact. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.11-17-24 of the Draft EIR and in the Noise Assessment, Appendix I to the Draft EIR, the Project will result in a permanent noise increase in the vicinity of the Project Site because the Site is currently vacant. Traffic servicing the Project Site will |
25
|
add to the existing noise along Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street between future Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60. However, there are no sensitive receptors along either of these street segments which would be adversely affected by the increased noise. Any residential development on land south of future Eucalyptus Avenue will require a sound study, which will review the physical layout of the development, and, if noise problems are found, will require the imposition of appropriate noise reduction measures to ensure that the noise impacting future residents will not exceed that allowed by the Citys Municipal Code. | |
|
||
|
The buildings housing the Projects logistics and commercial uses will be serviced by loading docks and other accessory equipment which will operate outside of the buildings. If adjacent to residential and other sensitive land uses, these activities could result in adverse noise impacts. However, all of the Project related activities will be separated from surrounding areas by surface streets or SR-60. The traffic generated noise on these roadways will be much greater than noise generated on the Project Site and will, therefore, completely mask any such noise. Further, noise generated on the Project Site will be under 65 CNEL, the Citys noise standard for residential areas, for all areas zoned for residential development. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Exposure of people to excessive ground borne vibration or noise (Impact 5.11-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not expose people to, nor will it generate, excessive ground borne vibration or noise. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.11-24 of the Draft EIR and in the Noise Assessment, Appendix I to the Draft EIR, the grading and construction associated with the development of the Project will not require pile drivers, blasting or other vibration causing equipment or events. Rubber tired vehicles, such as the trucks and cars which will be servicing the Project, generally do not cause significant vibration. |
26
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Exposure of people to excessive noise levels from airports (Impact 5.11-4) |
Finding: | People working on the Project Site will not be subjected to excessive noise levels as a result of the Site being located within an airport land use plan area or within two miles of a public or public use airport. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.11-26 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site is not located within an airport land use plan area nor is it located within two miles of a public or public use airport. |
d. Potential Significant Impact: | Excessive noise levels due to the proximity of a private airstrip (Impact 5.11-5) |
Finding: | People working on the Project Site will not be subjected to excessive noise levels as a result of the Site being located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.7-9 and 5.11-26 of the Draft EIR, the nearest airport is more than seven miles away from the Project Site and there are no known private airstrips in the vicinity. Therefore, the Project Site will not be subject to excessive noise levels from aircraft. |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | The inducement of substantial population growth in the Project area (Impact 5.12-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not, directly or indirectly, induce substantial population growth in the Project area through the introduction of homes or businesses nor through the extension of roads or other infrastructure. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.12-3 of the Draft EIR, approximately 2,000 jobs will be generated by the development of the Project. It is expected that most of the workers will reside in the local area. There is a sufficient housing supply already in existence to accommodate those employees who will move into the City. | |
|
||
|
The construction of future Eucalyptus Avenue, as well as the extension of public services and utilities, will primarily serve the Project Site and will not lead, |
27
|
directly or indirectly, to any substantial population growth in the Project area. Adjacent properties may use future Eucalyptus Avenue, which will run between Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street, but adjacent properties already have access to these two roadways. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Displacement of existing housing (Impact 5.12-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not displace existing housing nor will it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.12-3-4 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site does not have any housing on it. |
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Displacement of people (Impact 5.12-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not displace people nor will it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.12-4 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site is currently vacant so that the development of the Project will not result in the displacement of anyone. |
d. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on population, housing and employment. |
Finding: | Cumulative impacts caused by the development of the Project, in conjunction with other development, will not be cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 6-23-24 of the Draft EIR, the development of the Project will help improve the Citys jobs/housing imbalance by adding jobs but not housing. Development of other land will be pursuant to the Citys existing General Plan, which contemplates a substantial increase in jobs and homes, and will not be affected by the development of the Project. |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | The provision of new or physically altered police facilities (Impact 5.13-1) |
28
Finding: | The Project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered police facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police services. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.13-1-2 of the Draft EIR and in the letter from Moreno Valleys Police Chief, in Appendix L to the Draft EIR, the development of the Project may require an incremental increase in the need for police services but no new facilities will have to be constructed to provide that service which will be in the form of personnel and equipment which will be paid for out of general City revenues. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities (Impact 5.13-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for school services. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.13-4 of the Draft EIR, the Project will not contain any homes and therefore will not house any school-age children and will not, therefore, create the need for new or altered school facilities. Further, the payment of school fees authorized by Government Code § 65995 would constitute full mitigation even if any additional needs were created. |
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered park facilities (Impact 5.13-4) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered park facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for park services. |
29
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.13-5-6 of the Draft EIR, the Project is not expected to generate more than a few new residents in the City. The satisfaction of the park needs of those new citizens has already been accounted for as part of the Citys projected population and residential growth in the existing General Plan. There are currently no City recreational facilities near the Project Site that would be used by employees. |
d. Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of other new or physically altered other facilities (Impact 5.13-6) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of other new or physically altered other facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other services. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.13-6 of the Draft EIR, the Project is not expected to generate more than a few new residents in the City. The satisfaction of the other needs of those new citizens has already been accounted for as part of the Citys projected population and residential growth in the existing General Plan. There are currently no other City facilities near the Project Site that would be used by employees. |
e. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on public services |
Finding: | Cumulative impacts caused by the Project, in conjunction with other development, will not be cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 6-24-25 of the Draft EIR, the impacts on public services caused by the development of the Project will be less than significant. Development of other land will be pursuant to the Citys existing General Plan, which incorporates the need for, and the provision of, public services and will not be affected by the development of the Project. |
30
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Exceeding a level of service set by a congestion management agency (Impact 5.14-2) |
Finding: | No roadway or highway subject to Riverside Countys Congestion Management Plan will be significantly affected by Project traffic. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.14-4 and -29-34 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-64-65 of the Final EIR, and in Traffic Study, Appendix J to the Draft EIR and in the Traffic Topical response, pages 3-145-163 of the Final EIR, the Project traffic will account for approximately 2% of the traffic at SR 60/I-215 which is less than the 3% level of significance threshold contained in the Riverside County Congestion Management Plan. | |
|
||
|
SR-60 is the only roadway or highway affected by the Project which is also subject to the Riverside County Congestion Management Plan. Two segments just east of the SR-60/I-215 intersection are currently, and will remain, at level of service F with or without Project traffic. However, while this exceeds the Riverside County Congestion Management Plans level of service requirement of E, it is less than significant because the Projects contribution of approximately 2% is less than the 3% level of significance threshold. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Increase in hazards due to a design feature or an incompatible use (Impact 5.14-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or an incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment). |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.14-34-35 of the Draft EIR, the Project Site will be served by large trucks. All roadways and entryways associated with the Project Site have been designed in accordance with standards provided by the City. Moreover, a separate northbound left-turn lane at the Theodore Street/SR-60 |
31
|
eastbound ramp will improve safety for truck operations over that currently existing. | |
|
||
|
The normal hazards associated with blind spots created when people in vehicles are in close proximity to large trucks and trailers will be substantially reduced because a single driveway will serve as a primary entrance for truck traffic serving the Project Site and potential blind spots will be addressed through the design feature of the individual driveways. | |
|
||
|
Finally, a Construction Management Plan will be implemented to address traffic during the grading and construction phases of the Project to ensure that construction traffic will not result in any hazards to the traveling public. |
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Inadequate emergency access (Impact 5.14-4) |
Finding: | The Project will not result in inadequate emergency access. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.14-35 of the Draft EIR, the Project does not create any barriers between roadways and any other land use. Emergency access to the Project Site will be available over future Eucalyptus Avenue from both Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street for all three Phases of the Project-even though access from Redlands Boulevard will not be available to the general public until Phase 3. |
d. Potential Significant Impact: |
Conflict with adopted policies, plans or
programs supporting alternative
transportation (Impact
5.14-5) |
Finding: | The Project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks, etc.). |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.14-35-39 of the Draft EIR, future Eucalyptus Avenue will be improved adjacent to the Project Site and will be suitable for a bus route should one be extended to the Site by the Riverside County Transit Agency. Further, a multi-use trail, suitable for pedestrians and bicyclists, will be |
32
|
constructed adjacent to the Project Site on the north side of future Eucalyptus Avenue. |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Exceeding wastewater treatment requirements (Impact 5.15-1) |
Finding: | The Project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements set by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.15-1 and -9 of the Draft EIR, the Projects wastewater flows will be typical of those from commercial/retail facilities and, for the logistics facilities, would consist of domestic waste from employees. No effluents are expected that would exceed the treatment requirements set by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Construction of new water and wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects (Impact 5.15-2) |
Finding: | The Project will not require, nor result in, the construction of new water and wastewater treatment facilities nor the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.15-2-5 and -9 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-65-68 of the Final EIR, no expansion of existing water and wastewater treatment facilities will be required to serve the Project Site. |
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects (Impact 5.15-3) |
Finding: | The Project will not require, not will it result in, the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities nor will it require, nor result in, the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. |
33
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed in Section 5.8 and page 5.15-9 of the Draft EIR, as modified by pages 4-55-58 of the Final EIR, the Projects new stormwater drainage facilities will decrease stormwater runoff from the Project Site compared to that which currently exists and will also significantly reduce the pollutant load of stormwater runoff over that which currently exists. |
d. Potential Significant Impact: | Adequacy of water supplies available to serve the Project (Impact 5.15-4) |
Finding: | Sufficient water supplies are available to serve the Project from existing resources so that neither new nor expanded entitlements are required. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.15-2-5, 9-11 and 14-15 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-67-68 of the Final EIR, and the March 5, 2008, Water Supply Assessment prepared for the Project by the water provider, the Eastern Municipal Water District (the EMWD) as corrected by the June 4, 2008, letter from the EMWD, Appendix K.2 to the Draft EIR, the Project, at build out, will use just over 140 acre feet of potable water per year. The Water Supply Assessment, which was prepared pursuant to SB610, took into consideration the October, 2007, reduction in water from Northern California through the State Water Project which substantially reduced the amount of water available to Southern California. After taking that information into consideration, the EMWD determined that it will be able to provide adequate water supply to meet the potable water demand for Tentative Parcel Map 35629, in addition to existing and future uses. (Page 33 of the Water Supply Assessment.) | |
|
||
|
Further, existing water infrastructure currently exists which, with the addition of a 12 inch pipeline to the Project Site from an existing water line located south of and adjacent to SR-60, west of Redlands Boulevard, will allow water to be brought to the Project Site. | |
|
||
|
Although no mitigation is required to reduce any significant impact, Mitigation Measure W-1, set forth on pages 5.15-14-15 of the Draft EIR, which requires the preparation of a planting and irrigation for the |
34
|
Citys review and approval, has been imposed as a condition of Project approval to ensure further reduction of water used for landscaping. |
e. Potential Significant Impact: | Adequacy of wastewater treatment capacity (Impact 5.15-5) |
Finding: | Adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists to serve the Project in addition to existing commitments. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.15-1 and 11 of the Draft EIR, the Project will generate approximately 61,680 gallons of wastewater per day. The EMWDs Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility has a capacity to treat 16,000,000 gallons of wastewater per day with the ability to expand to 41,000,000 gallons per day. The current utilization is approximately 11,200,000 gallons per day. | |
|
||
|
An existing sewer line will be extended along Redlands Boulevard and then easterly along future Eucalyptus Avenue to serve the Project Site. |
f. Potential Significant Impact: | Insufficient landfill capacity to accommodate the Projects solid waste disposal needs (Impact 5.15-6) |
Finding: | Adequate landfill capacity exists to accommodate the Projects solid waste disposal needs. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.15-6-7 and -11-12 of the Draft EIR, the Project, at build out, will generate just under 129 tons of solid waste per day. The City currently has available to it three landfills. The three landfills have a total capacity to accept solid waste of just under 14,600 tons per day, a minimum of 3,820 tons per day of which is not currently being used. The total remaining capacity in the three landfills is approximately 134,200,000 tons with sufficient capacity for the next 10 to 15 years with the ability to expand for another 15 years after that. |
35
g. Potential Significant Impact: | Compliance with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste capacity (Impact 5.15-7) |
Finding | The Project will comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste capacity. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on page 5.15-12 of the Draft EIR, the City has regulations which govern the disposal of solid waste. Skechers, the tenant for the building to be constructed on the Parcel 1, has instituted a significant recycling program at its current locations which will be continued upon relocation to the Project Site. Further, recycled material will be used to the greatest extent practicable in the construction of the Project. |
h. Potential Significant Impact: | Sufficiency of electrical service for the Project (Impact 5.15-8) |
Finding: | The Project will be provided with sufficient electrical service. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.15-7-8, -12-14 and 5.16-11- 13, as modified on pages 4-68-69 of the Final EIR, the Project will use approximately 3.7 megawatts of electricity which will be provided by the City of Moreno Valley Utilities. The substation which will serve the Project Site has a current capacity of 56 megawatts, expandable to 112 megawatts, with a current peak load of 15 megawatts. | |
|
||
|
Although no mitigation is required to reduce any significant impact, Mitigation Measure GCC-1 through GCC-4, set forth on page 5.16-11 of the Draft EIR, which require increased energy efficiency, the use of cool roofs and paints, the production of energy on-site through the use of alternate, renewable energy sources and the use of energy efficient appliances and systems, and GCC-9, set forth on page 5.15-13 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4.20 of the Final EIR, which requires LEED certification, have been imposed as conditions of Project approval to ensure greater reductions in energy used by the Project. |
36
i. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on utilities and service systems |
Finding:
|
Cumulative impacts on utilities and service systems caused by the Project, in conjunction with other development, will not be cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 6-32-33 of the Draft EIR and in subsections I.V.A.l4.a-h above, the Projects impacts on water and wastewater treatment requirements and capacity, stormwater drainage facilities, water supply availability, solid waste disposal capacity and availability of electricity at build out will be less than significant. The Projects impacts on each of these utilities and public services has already been factored in to long term needs and requirements so that its cumulative impacts will also be less than significant. |
B. | IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR AS POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT THAT HAVE BEEN MITIGATED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT |
1. | AESTHETICS |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Creation of a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area (Impact 5.1-4) |
Finding:
|
The Project has the potential of creating a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. However, with the imposition of Mitigation Measure A-1, which requires limitations on night time lighting during construction, and compliance with existing City ordinances, standards and regulations, the impact will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.1-26-35 of the Draft EIR, the lighting associated with the operation of the Project will be required to comply with all of the Citys lighting regulations and will therefore result in a less than significant impact. Nighttime lighting during the Projects construction has the potential to create temporary new sources of light and glare that will emanate from the Project Site. Requiring the use of directional lighting, shielding and other similar measures will ensure that the impact will be less than |
37
|
significant. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure A-l, set forth on page 5.1-35 of the Draft EIR, has been imposed as a condition of approval of the Project. |
2. | BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial adverse effect on federally and California protected and special-status plant and wildlife (Impact 5.4-1) |
Finding:
|
The Project Site contains moderately suitable habitat for the Stephens kangaroo rat, the burrowing owl and for ground-, tree- and shrub-nesting birds, all of which could be adversely affected by the development of the Project. The imposition of Mitigation Measures BR-1 through BR-3, which require the protection of birds which might be found on the Project Site and the payment of mitigation fees which will be used to protect the Stephens Kangaroo Rat, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.4-1-31 and -35-36 of the Draft EIR and in the Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Appendix C.1 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site contains moderately suitable habitat for several federally and state protected plants and wildlife which would be affected directly, and through the loss of habitat, indirectly, as a result of the development of the Project. However, a pre-construction survey of the Project Site, avoidance of activities which would affect nesting sites and payment of the mitigation fee called for under the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan will ensure that the impacts will be less than significant Accordingly, Mitigation Measures BR-1, BR-2 and BR-3, set forth on pages 5.4-34-35 of the Draft EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources (Impact 5.4-5) |
Finding:
|
The Project Site is located within an area which is subject both to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan so that the development of the Project has the potential to adversely affect biological resources. The imposition of |
38
|
Mitigation Measures BR-2 through BR-4, which require the protection of birds which might be found on the Project Site and the payment of mitigation fees which will be used to protect the Stephens Kangaroo Rat and the species protected under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.4-32-33 of the Draft EIR and in the Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Appendix C.1 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site is located within an area which is subject both to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan. However, with respect to both Plans, the Project Site is located in an area which calls for the payment of mitigation fees which have been determined to be full mitigation for the impacts which may occur. Accordingly, Mitigation Measures BR-2, BR-3 and BR-4, set forth on pages 5.4-34-35 of the Draft EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan (Impact 5.4-6) |
Finding:
|
The Project Site lies within an area subject to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan. The development of the Project could significantly affect the species and their habitats protected by the two Plans. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures BR-2, which requires the payment of mitigation fees which will be used to protect the Stephens Kangaroo Rat, and BR-4, which requires the payment of mitigation fees which will be used to protect the species protected under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.4-1-33-34 of the Draft EIR and the Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Appendix C.1 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site is located in an area subject to both Plans. However, both Plans identify the Project Site as an area where the payment of mitigation fees will fully mitigate any impact which might otherwise occur. |
39
|
Accordingly, Mitigation Measures BR-2 and BR-4, set forth on pages 5.4-34-35 of the Draft EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
d. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on biological resources |
Finding:
|
Cumulative impacts caused by the development of the Project, in conjunction with other development, could result in significant and adverse impacts to biological resources. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures BR-1 through BR-4, which require the protection of birds which might be found on the Project Site, the payment of mitigation fees which will be used to protect the Stephens Kangaroo Rat and the species protected under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and compliance by other projects with the requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and The Stephens Kangaroo Rat Conservation Plan will reduce the impacts to less than cumulatively considerable and thus to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 6-10-11 of the Draft EIR and in the Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Appendix C.1 to the Draft EIR, substantial amounts of land in the vicinity of the Project contain habitat beneficial to various species. However, the land is also within the areas subject to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and The Stephens Kangaroo Rat Conservation Plan, both of which are designed to protect habitat and species. The imposition of Mitigation Measures BR-1 through BR-4, discussed in subsections IV.2.a-c above, on the Project and the compliance of other projects with the requirements of the two plans will ensure that the impacts on biological resources will be reduced to less than significant. |
3. | CULTURAL RESOURCES |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial change in the significance of an historical or archeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guideline § 15064.5 (Impact 5.5-1) |
Finding:
|
Although no known cultural resources are located on the Project Site, 14 cultural resources have been identified within one mile of the Site so that |
40
|
development of the Project could have a significant impact on cultural resources. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-4, which require a City approved archeologist to oversee cultural resource mitigation monitoring while earth moving activities are taking place on the Project Site and which set forth the procedures to be followed if archeological resources are encountered, including consultation with the appropriate culturally affiliated native American Tribe, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.5-1-7 of the Draft EIR and the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey Report, Appendix E to the Draft EIR, the Project Site does not contain any prehistoric sites or isolated artifacts. However, a record search indicated that 14 cultural resources are located within one mile of the Site. The Project Site has been plowed for many years and it is possible that cultural resources might be found once grading begins. Requiring continuing archeological review and monitoring, in cooperation with the representative of a City designated Tribe, will reduce the impact to less than significant. Accordingly, Mitigation Measures CR-1, CR-2, CR-3 and CR-4, set forth on page 5.5-8 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-9-10 of the Final EIR, which will ensure adequate protection of any cultural resources which may be found during grading of the Project Site, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Destruction of a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature (Impact 5.5-2). |
Finding:
|
There are no unique paleontological resource or unique geologic features on the Project Site. However, the impact of the development of the Project on paleontological resources is considered significant because there is a moderate possibility that paleontological resources exist because the geological feature underlying the Project Site has a high potential to contain such resources. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measure CR-5, which require a City approved paleontologist to oversee paleontological resource mitigation monitoring while earth moving activities are taking place on the Project Site and which sets forth the procedures to be followed if paleontological resources are encountered, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
41
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.5-6-7 of the Draft EIR and in the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey Report, Appendix E to the Draft EIR, a literature search indicated that no paleontological resources have been identified on the Project Site. However, the Project Site is situated upon a geologic feature which is highly sensitive for fossil resources. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure CR-5, set forth on page 5.5-9 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-10 of the Final EIR, which will ensure adequate protection of any paleontological resources which may be found during grading of the Project Site, has been imposed as a condition of approval of the Project. |
c. Potential Significant Impact: | Disturbance of human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries (Impact 5.5-3) |
Finding:
|
The location of human remains within the Project Site would be a significant impact even though no human remains have been identified on the Site nor are any expected to be found. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measure CR-6, which requires compliance with the procedures set forth if human remains are encountered, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on page 5.5-7 of the Draft EIR and the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey Report, Appendix E to the Draft EIR, no human remains have been located in or near the Project Site and none are expected. However, the Site is located in an area which has been inhabited by several Native American Tribes in the past and the possibility that human remains may be found on the Site cannot be rejected. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure CR-6, set forth on pages 5.5-9-10, as modified on pages 4-11-12 of the Final EIR, which will ensure adequate protection of any human remains which may be found during grading of the Project Site, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
d. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative impacts on cultural resources |
Finding:
|
Cumulative impacts caused by the development of the Project, in conjunction with other development, could result in significant adverse impacts to |
42
|
cultural resources. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-6, which require a City approved archeologist to oversee cultural resource mitigation monitoring, and a City approved paleontologist to oversee paleontological resources, while earth moving activities are taking place on the Project Site and which set forth the procedures to be followed if archeological or paleontological resources or human remains are encountered, including consultation with the appropriate culturally affiliated native American Tribe, will reduce the impacts to less than cumulatively considerable and thus to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As set forth on pages 6-11-12 of the Draft EIR and in the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey Report, Appendix E to the Draft EIR, no cultural resources have been found on or near the Project Site although cultural resources have been found within a mile of the Site and the Site itself lies within an area which has been historically used by several Native American Tribes. There therefore exists the possibility that cultural resources may be found on the Site once grading begins. However, Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-6, discussed in subsections IV.3.a-c above, which will ensure that the information associated with any cultural resources found on the Site will not be lost but will, instead, be available to be used in the context of cultural resources recovered from other, nearby sites, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
4. | HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | The creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials (Impact 5.7-l) |
Finding:
|
Neither the construction nor the operation of the Project will create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transfer, use or disposal of hazardous materials. However, fire and smoke hazards and emissions from diesel powered trucks serving the Project can result in significant environmental and health hazards. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures HH-1 through HH-4, Which require compliance with fire safety design and construction standards, AQ-5, which requires the review and approval by the City of a construction travel plan, AQ-8, which requires the use of electrically powered equipment during |
43
|
construction, AQ-10 through AQ-13, which require off-site construction to be limited to day light hours, posting signs prohibiting diesel idling for more than three minutes and prohibiting the establishment of sensitive receptors near the Project Site, and GCC-11, which prohibits heavy trucks from coming on to the Project Site if properly certified, will reduce the impacts to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.7-7-9 of the Draft EIR, the potentially hazardous materials that will be used in the construction and operation of the Project are all subject to substantial regulation in order to ensure that their use will not adversely affect the public health or safety. | |
|
||
|
Potential fire and smoke hazards associated with the Project, particularly given its size, could present a significant impact. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures HH-1 through HH-4, set forth on page 5.7-11 of the Draft EIR, which will substantially minimize the chance of a major fire, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. | |
|
||
|
As discussed on pages 5.3-49-53 and 5.7-8-9, emissions from diesel trucks serving the Project Site could have a substantial impact on the health of anyone living south of future Eucalyptus Avenue. Prohibiting idling of diesel trucks, providing electricity to trucks at the Project Site, requiring that only trucks in good operating condition be allowed to access the Project Site and requiring the applicant to record a land use restriction which will prohibit residential development south of future Eucalyptus Avenue will ensure that adverse health impacts will be mitigated into insignificance. Accordingly, Mitigation Measures AQ-11 through AQ-13, as set forth on page 5.3-52 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-5-6 of the Final EIR, and GCC-11, set forth on pages 4-5-6 of the Final EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative hazard and hazardous materials impacts |
44
Finding:
|
Cumulative impacts caused by the development of the Project, in conjunction with other development, could result in significant adverse impacts resulting from hazards and hazardous materials. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures HH-1 through HH-4, which require compliance with fire safety design and construction standards, and AQ-13 which prohibits the establishment of sensitive receptors near the Project Site, on the Project and similar mitigation measures on other projects will reduce the impact to less than cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 6.12-13 of the Draft EIR, the potentially hazardous materials that will be used in the construction and operation of the Project are all subject to substantial regulation in order to ensure that their use will not adversely affect the public health or safety. Similar regulation will also apply to the development of other projects. The imposition of Mitigation Measures HH-1 through HH-4 and AQ-13, discussed in subsection IV.4.a above, on the Project and the imposition of similar mitigation measures on other projects will reduce the impacts to less than significant. |
5. | LAND USE AND PLANNING |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted to avoid or mitigate environmental effects (Impact 5.9-2) |
Finding:
|
The Project would be technically inconsistent with the Citys General Plan and Zoning Ordinance prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendment and the change of zone. However, after the adoption of the General Plan amendment and the change of zone, the Project will be fully consistent with the goals and policies of the Citys General Plan for this area of the City under the existing land use plan and will not conflict with any of the Citys policies or regulations adopted to avoid or mitigate an environmental effect. The imposition of Mitigation Measure LU-1, which prohibits the establishment of sensitive receptors near the Project Site, will reduce the impacts to less than significant consistent with goals set by regional planning organizations. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.9-16-27 of the Draft EIR and pages 4-58-59 of the Final EIR, with the adoption of |
45
|
the required General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, the Project is consistent with all of the Citys applicable land use, General Plan and Zoning Goals and Policies, including those designed to avoid or mitigate environmental effects. The Project will be consistent with all of the regional and County plans except that it will be inconsistent with the air quality goals of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan and the Western Riverside County Council of Governments Comprehensive Plan but neither the Air Quality Management District nor the Associations have any permitting jurisdiction over the Project. Imposing a buffer immediately south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, which will prohibit the location of residences and other sensitive receptors through the recordation of a deed restriction, will ensure that no sensitive receptors near the Project Site will be affected by adverse air quality impacts emanating from the construction and operation of the Project. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure LU-1, set forth on page 4-13 of the Final EIR, has been imposed as a condition of approval of the Project. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Conflict with an applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan (Impact 5.9-3) |
Finding:
|
The Project could conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures BR-2 through BR-4 which require the protection of birds which might be found on the Project Site and the payment of mitigation fees which will be used to protect the Stephens Kangaroo Rat and the species protected under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.4-32-33 of the Draft EIR and in the Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Appendix C-1 to the Draft EIR, the Project Site is located within an area which is subject to both the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan. However, with respect to both Plans, the Project |
46
|
Site is located in an area which calls for the payment of mitigation fees which have been determined to be full mitigation for the impacts which may occur. Accordingly, Mitigation Measures BR-2, BR-3 and BR-4, set forth on pages 5.4-34-35 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-8 of the Final EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
6. | NOISE |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project (Impact 5.11-3) |
Finding:
|
Construction work on the Project Site could result in substantial temporary increases in ambient noise levels for existing residences located along Redlands Boulevard, However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures N-1 through N-5, which require that no construction vehicles use Redlands Boulevard south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, that there be no night time construction within 1200 feet of sensitive receptors, that temporary sound barriers be constructed to ensure that day time construction noise not exceed City standards, that all equipment be kept in good working order and that materials be stockpiled at least 1200 feet from residences south of future Eucalyptus Avenue along Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street, will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed in Section 5.11 of the Draft EIR and in the Noise Assessment, Appendix I to the Draft EIR, off-site construction along Redlands Boulevard, Theodore Street, future Eucalyptus Avenue and the drainage facilities to the south of the Project Site will take place during daylight hours and, with the exception of noisy equipment which will be used for very limited periods of time, there will be no substantial exposure of residents to significant noise impacts. The grading and construction which will take place on the Project Site will take place around the clock for almost a year and would expose nearby residents to noise levels in excess of those allowed under the Citys Municipal Code. However, prohibiting construction vehicles on Redlands Boulevard south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, prohibiting nighttime grading within 1,200 feet of |
47
|
residences south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, the erection of temporary sound barriers, maintaining equipment in good working order and locating material stockpiles at least 1,200 feet from residences south of future Eucalyptus Avenue along Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street will ensure that none of the residences will be exposed to noise levels in excess of those allowed by the Citys Municipal Code. Accordingly, Mitigation Measures N-1 through N-5, as set forth on pages 5.11-29-30 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-14-15 of the Final EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. |
7. | TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC |
a. Potential Significant Impact: | Substantial increase on traffic load and street capacity (Impact 5.14-1) |
Finding:
|
As there is currently little traffic between Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street between future Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60 any additional traffic by comparison could be considered significant and would cause the intersection of Redlands Boulevard and the SR-60 westbound ramps to exceed the Citys level of service during the AM peak hour. However, with the imposition of Mitigation Measures TT-1 through TT-3, which require the constructions of improvements on Redlands Boulevard, Theodore Street and at their intersections with SR-60 or the payment of fees for the construction of the improvements, the impacts will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 5.14-15-28 and -39-40 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-64-65 of the Final EIR, and in the Traffic Study, Appendix J to the Draft EIR, a large number of trucks serving the Project Site will use Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street between future Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60. The Citys level of service is D. Without improvements, the intersection of Redlands Boulevard and the SR-60 westbound ramps would be at level of service E in the AM peak hour. Requiring the improvement of the intersection will reduce the impact to less than significant. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure TT-2, set forth on page 5.14-39 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-16 of the Final EIR, has been imposed as a condition of approval of the Project. Although no mitigation is required to reduce any other significant |
48
|
impact, Mitigation Measures TT-1 and TT-3, set forth on pages 5.14-39-40 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-16 of the Final EIR, have also been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project to ensure that any improvements needed at the intersections of future Eucalyptus Avenue and Redland Boulevard and Theodore Street and at the intersection of Theodore Street and SR-60 will also be constructed. |
b. Potential Significant Impact: | Cumulative traffic impacts |
Finding:
|
Cumulative impacts of the Project, in conjunction with other development, could result in significant adverse impacts on traffic. However, the imposition of Mitigation Measures TT-1 through TT-3, which require the constructions of improvements on Redlands Boulevard, Theodore Street and at their intersections with SR-60 or the payment of fees for the construction of the improvements, and TT(C)-1 through TT(C)-3, which require the constructions of improvements on Redlands Boulevard, Theodore Street and at their intersections with SR-60 or the payment of fees for the construction of the improvements, on the Project, together similar mitigation measures imposed on other projects, will reduce the impacts to less than cumulatively considerable and thus will be less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As discussed on pages 6-25-32 of the Draft EIR and in the Traffic Study, Appendix J to the Draft EIR, traffic impacts of other projects have the potential to cause a number of intersections to exceed the Citys level of service D requirement. Requiring the Project to provide improvements to the intersections of future Eucalyptus Avenue with Redland Boulevards and Theodore Street and at the intersections of SR-60 and Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street will ensure that the projects impacts will be less than significant. Accordingly, Mitigation measures TT-1 through TT-3, as set forth on pages 5.14-39-40 of the Draft EIR, as modified on page 4-16 of the Final EIR, and TT-1(C) through TT-3(C), set forth on pages 6-32 of the Draft EIR, have been imposed as condition of approval of the Project. The Citys General Plan requires that new development mitigate their traffic impacts so that similar mitigation measures will be imposed on other projects. |
49
C. | IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR AS BEING SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE EVEN AFTER THE IMPOSITION OF ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES |
1. | AESTHETICS |
a. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista (Impact 5.1-1) |
Finding:
|
The development of the Project will have a substantial adverse effect on a significant scenic vista and there are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding:
|
As shown and discussed on pages 5.1-4-25 of the Draft EIR and Appendix M to the Draft EIR, the Project Site is currently vacant except for a single structure and thus is part of a scenic open space vista. In addition, the Project Site as it now exists is somewhat obscured by existing trees and vegetation but does not completely interfere with the views of mountains and foothills to the north, east and south. The development of the Project will block views of these scenic vistas from SR-60, Redlands Boulevard, future Eucalyptus Avenue and Theodore Street along the full length of each of these roadways adjacent to the Project Site. Further, the buildings to be constructed on the Project Site will be visible from higher elevations to the north, the east and the south and will alter the expansive view of the undeveloped property now evidenced from these areas. | |
|
||
|
These impacts are significant and unavoidable and there are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the impact to less than significant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. |
b. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Cumulative aesthetic impacts |
Finding:
|
The development of the Project, in conjunction with related projects and that authorized by the Moreno Highlands Specific Plan, will result in significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts on scenic vistas and there are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the impact to less than significant. |
50
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 6-5-6 of the Draft EIR, the development of land in the vicinity of the Project Site will add to the loss of scenic vistas which will occur because of the development of the Project. There are no mitigation measures which will reduce the impacts to less than significant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. Given the similarity of impacts of other likely uses for the Project Site, only prohibiting any development would mitigate the impacts to less than significant. |
a. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use (Impact 5.2-1) |
Finding: | The development of the Project will have a significant and unavoidable impact on 24.1 acres of Prime Farmland, 98.8 acres of Farmland of Local Importance and 35.5 acres of Other Land which will be converted from agricultural uses into commercial and industrial uses. There are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the impact to less than significant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. Given the similarity of impacts of other likely uses for the Project Site, only prohibiting any development would mitigate the impacts to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.2-1 and -6-7 of the Draft EIR and in the Agricultural Resources Report and Land Evaluation and Site Assessment and the Agricultural Impact Evaluation, Appendices B.1 and B.2 to the Draft EIR, the Citys General Plan recognizes that farming has become less economically viable because of the high cost of water, the cost of land and property taxes, conflicts with surrounding urban uses and the lack of agri-business support in the area. Although the Project Site does contain land which has been identified by the California Department of Conservation as suitable for farming, the absence of an agricultural infrastructure crop managers, labor, farm implements and processing facilities in the vicinity, the cost of bringing suitable water to the Project Site, the cost of the water itself and the fact that the sale of the products which could be grown if water were available would not cover the costs of |
51
|
production means that the Project Site cannot be realistically considered as an agricultural resource. | |
|
||
|
There are no feasible mitigation measures which could reduce the loss of the farmland. There is a finite amount of land that is suitable for agricultural use. The purchase of fee title or of agricultural conservation easements over other parcels used for agriculture would not avoid, reduce or compensate for the impact of converting the Project Site from agricultural to commercial and industrial uses because it would not offset the loss of agricultural land caused by the development of the Project, i.e., there would still be a net reduction in the total amount of land suitable for agricultural use. Further, no City policy requires the acquisition of replacement agricultural land, either in fee or through the use of a conservation easement, and no program to oversee such acquisitions exist. |
b. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Cumulative loss of farmland |
Finding: | The development of the Project, in conjunction with related projects and that authorized by the Moreno Highlands Specific Plan, will result in significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts on farming. There are no mitigation measures which will reduce the impact to less than significant other than prohibiting development on sites now used for agriculture. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.2-5-7 and 6-6-7 of the Draft EIR and in the Agricultural Resources Report and Land Evaluation and Site Assessment and the Agricultural Impact Evaluation, Appendices B.1 and B.2 to the Draft EIR, the Citys General Plan recognizes that farming has become less economically viable because of the high cost of water, the cost of land and property taxes, conflicts with surrounding urban uses and the lack of agri-business support in the area. Although the Project Site does contain land which has been identified by the California Department of Conservation as suitable for farming, the absence of an agricultural infrastructure crop managers, labor, farm implements and processing facilities in the vicinity, the cost of bringing suitable water to the Project Site, the cost of the water itself and the fact that the sale of the products which could |
52
|
be grown if water were available would not cover the costs of production means that the Project Site cannot be realistically considered as an agricultural resource. | |
|
||
|
There are no feasible mitigation measures which could reduce the loss of the farmland. There is a finite amount of land that is suitable for agricultural use. The purchase of fee title or of agricultural conservation easements over other parcels used for agriculture would not avoid, reduce or compensate for the impact of converting the Project Site from agricultural to commercial and industrial uses because it would not offset the loss of agricultural land caused by the development of the Project, i.e., there would still be a net reduction in the total amount of land suitable for agricultural use. Further, no City policy requires the acquisition of replacement agricultural land, either in fee or through the use of a conservation easement, and no program to oversee such acquisitions exist. |
a. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Violation of an air quality standard or substantial contribution to an existing or projected air quality violation (Impact 5.3-2) |
Finding: | The construction and operation of the Project will not violate any air quality standards for localized impacts with two exceptions: those promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for the emission of coarse and fine particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) during the construction of the Project. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-10, which require the control of fugitive dust, the acquisition of Tier II level construction equipment, to the extent available, the proper maintenance of construction equipment, the turning off of construction equipment when not in use and prohibiting idling for more than five minutes, the control of traffic around the Project Site, the use of low volatile organic compound paints applied using either high-volume low-pressure spray equipment or by hand, the encouragement of construction workers to carpool, the provision of on-site electrical hook-ups during construction, the reduction of the amount of dust which will be tracked off-site and limiting off-site construction improvements to an eight hour day during daylight hours will reduce the impact of the emission of PM 10 , to less than significant. There are no mitigation measures which will reduce the emission of PM 2.5 to less than |
53
|
significant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.3-22-40 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-40-44 of the Final EIR, and in the Air Quality and Health Risk Report, Appendix D.1 to the Draft EIR, the grading of the Project Site and the operation of the Project will result in the emission of pollutants nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), carbon monoxide (CO), PM 10 and PM 2 . 5 . The South Coast Air Quality Management District has established localized significance thresholds to determine whether the emission of any of the pollutants will have a significant adverse effect on those nearby, both residents and workers. None of the thresholds will be exceeded after the construction of the buildings on the Project Site has been completed and operations begun. The same thing is true for NO 2 and CO during the construction Phases of the Project. However, without mitigation, the thresholds will be exceeded for both PM 10 and PM 2 . 5 . Requiring the control of fugitive dust, acquiring Tier II level construction equipment, to the extent available, properly maintaining construction equipment, turning off construction equipment when not in use and prohibiting idling for more than five minutes, controlling traffic around the Project Site, using low volatile organic compound paints applied using either high-volume low-pressure spray equipment or by hand, encouraging construction workers to carpool, providing on-site electrical hook-ups during construction, reducing the amount of dust which will be tracked off-site and limiting off-site construction improvements to an eight hour day during daylight hours will ensure that the emission of PM 10 will be mitigated into insignificance. Accordingly, Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-10, as set forth on pages 5.3-38-39 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-2-5 of the Final EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. However, there are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the emissions of PM 2.5 to less than significant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. |
54
b. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Cumulatively significant net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project area is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (Impact 5.3-3) |
Finding:
|
The Project Site is located in a non-attainment area for ozone, PM 10 and PM 2 . 5 . The grading of the Project Site and the construction of Phase 1 of the Project on the Site could result in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NO X ), PM 10 and PM 2 . 5 in excess of the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-10, which require the control of fugitive dust, the acquisition of Tier II level construction equipment, to the extent available, the proper maintenance of construction equipment, the turning off of construction equipment when not in use and prohibiting idling for more than five minutes, the control of traffic around the Project Site, the use of low volatile organic compound paints applied using either high-volume low-pressure spray equipment or by hand, the encouragement of construction workers to carpool, the provision of on-site electrical hook-ups during construction, the reduction of the amount of dust which will be tracked off-site and limiting off-site construction improvements to an eight hour day during daylight hours will reduce the impact of the emission of PM 10 , will ensure that the daily amount of PM 10 and PM 2 . 5 emitted during the grading and construction Phase 1 of the Project will reduce their impacts to less than significant and will reduce the daily amount of the emission of VOC and NO X but not to less than significant. | |
|
||
|
The grading and construction associated with Phase 2 of the Project will result in the daily amount of emissions of VOC and NO X in excess of the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District; the daily amount of emissions of PM 10 and PM 2 . 5 will be less than those thresholds. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-10, described above, will reduce the daily amount of emissions of VOC and NO X but not to less than significant. | |
|
||
|
The grading and construction associated with Phase 3 of the Project will result in the daily amount of emissions of VOC exceeding the threshold promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District; the daily amount of emissions of NO X , PM 10 and PM 2.5 will not exceed those thresholds. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-10, described above, will reduce the daily amount of emissions of VOC but not to less than significant. |
55
|
The daily amount of emissions of VOC, NO X , PM 10 and PM 2.5 associated with the operation of the Project during all Project Phases will exceed the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-11 through AQ-21, which require off-site construction be limited to day light hours, signs be posted stating that diesel trucks not idle for more than three minutes, the provision of electricity and electrical hooks-ups for transportation refrigeration, the prohibition against trucks not using electrically powered refrigeration units the prohibition of the establishment of sensitive receptors near the Project Site, the encouragement of the use of clean trucks and vehicles, the design of the Project Site to diminish queuing of trucks, the provision of food service on-site, the provision of incentives for employees to carpool and the maximization of electrical electrically powered equipment for landscape maintenance, and GCC-5(a), which requires the provision of facilities designed to encourage the use of bicycles, GCC-5(e), which requires preferential parking for carpools, vanpools and alternatively fueled vehicles, GCC-9, which requires LEED credit in a number of areas, and GCC-11, which prohibits access of heavy trucks to the Project Site for heavy trucks which do not have an Engine Certification label, will reduce the daily amount of emissions slightly but in no case will they cause the emissions to be less than significant. | |
|
||
|
In no case will the daily amount of the emission of CO exceed the threshold promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District during either the grading of the Project Site or the construction of buildings on the Site. The daily amount of emissions of CO will exceed the threshold for CO promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District during all of the three operational Phases of the Project. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-11 through AQ-21 and GCC-5(a), GCC-5(e), GCC-9 and GCC-11, all as described above, will reduce the daily amount of emissions slightly but not to less than significant. | |
|
||
|
There are no further mitigation measures which will reduce the foregoing impacts to insignificant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. | |
|
||
|
The daily amount of emissions of SO X will be less than the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District throughout the grading of the Project Site, the construction of buildings on the Site and the operation of the Project. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on Section 5.3 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4.40-4.46 of the Final EIR, and in the Air Quality and Health Risk Report, Appendix D.1 |
56
|
to the Draft EIR, the development of the Project has the potential of emitting criteria pollutants, except for SO X , in excess of the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District during the grading of the Project Site, construction of buildings on the Site and the operation of the Project. Requiring the control of fugitive dust, acquiring Tier II level construction equipment, to the extent available, properly maintaining construction equipment, turning off construction equipment when not in use and prohibiting idling for more than five minutes, controlling traffic around the Project Site, using low volatile organic compound paints applied using either high-volume low-pressure spray equipment or by hand, encouraging construction workers to carpool, providing on-site electrical hook-ups during construction, reducing the amount of dust which will be tracked off-site and limiting off-site construction improvements to an eight hour day during daylight hours will ensure that the daily amount of emissions of PM 10 and PM 2.5 during the grading and construction associated with Phase 1 of the Project will be mitigated into insignificance. Accordingly, Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-10, set forth on pages 5.3-38-39 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-2-5 of the Final EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. The same conditions will reduce the daily amount of emissions of NO X during the grading and construction associated with Phase 2 of the Project to less than significant but will reduce the daily amount of emissions of VOC only slightly and not below the threshold promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The daily amount of emissions of the other criteria pollutants will be below the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. | |
|
||
|
The daily amount of emissions of VOC associated with the grading and construction of Phase 3 of the Project will exceed the threshold promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-10, as described above, will reduce the daily amount of |
57
|
emissions of VOC slightly but not to less than significant. The daily amount of emissions of the remaining criteria pollutants will all be below the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. | |
|
||
|
The daily amount of emissions for all three operational phases of the Project, with the exception of SO X , will exceed the thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-11 through AQ-13, as set forth on page 5.3-52 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-5-6 of the Final EIR, AQ-14 through AQ-21, set forth on pages 4-6-6 of the Final EIR, GCC-5(a), GCC-5(e) and GCC-9, set forth on pages 5.16-11-13, as modified on pages 4-19-20 of the Final EIR, and GCC-11, set forth on page 4-21 of the Final EIR, all as described above, will reduce the daily amount of emissions of each of the other five criteria pollutants slightly but not to less than significant. | |
|
||
|
There are no further mitigation measures which will reduce the emissions of the criteria pollutants to less than significant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. The emissions of VOC and NO X are associated with the grading of the Project Site and the asphalt, building and architectural coatings for those buildings. The operational emissions are due almost entirely to mobile sources cars and trucks over which the City has no control because the Legislature has vested all authority to deal with the emissions from cars and trucks in the California Air Resources Board. |
c. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations (Impact 5.3-4) |
Finding: | The development of the Project has the potential to expose sensitive receptors to emissions of PM 10 and PM 2.5 in excess of local significance thresholds promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and to the risk of cancer from the operation of the Project in excess of the significance threshold of 10 in 1,000,000. The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-21, which require the control of fugitive dust, the acquisition of |
58
|
Tier II level construction equipment, to the extent available, the proper maintenance of construction equipment, the turning off of construction equipment when not in use and prohibiting idling for more than five minutes, the control of traffic around the Project Site, the use of low volatile organic compound paints applied using either high-volume low-pressure spray equipment or by hand, the encouragement of construction workers to carpool, the provision of on-site electrical hook-ups during construction, the reduction of the amount of dust which will be tracked off-site, limiting off-site construction improvements to an eight hour day during daylight hours, off-site construction be limited to day light hours, signs be posted stating that diesel trucks not idle for more than three minutes, the provision of electricity and electrical hooks-ups for transportation refrigeration, the prohibition against trucks not using electrically powered refrigeration units the prohibition of the establishment of sensitive receptors near the Project Site, the encouragement of the use of clean trucks and vehicles, the design of the Project Site to diminish queuing of trucks, the provision of food service on-site, the provision of incentives for employees to carpool and the maximization of electrical electrically powered equipment for landscape maintenance; and GCC-5(a), which requires the provision of facilities designed to encourage the use of bicycles, GCC-5(e), which requires preferential parking for carpools, vanpools and alternatively fueled vehicles, GCC-9, which requires LEED credit in a number of areas, and GCC-11, which prohibits access of heavy trucks to the Project Site for heavy trucks which do not have an Engine Certification label will reduce the impacts of PM 10 and the risk of cancer to less than significant but the risk associated with the emissions of PM 10 during the grading and construction associated with Phase 1 of the Project will remain significant and unavoidable. There are no mitigation measures which will reduce the impacts to less than significant which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed in Section 5.3 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-2-5 of the Final EIR, in the Air Quality and Health Risk Report, Appendix D.1 to the Draft EIR, as amplified and clarified in the Supplemental Health Risk Assessment Report, Appendix D.1 to the Final EIR, and in subsection IV.C.3.a above, the grading, construction and operation associated with the Project has the potential to exceed localized significance thresholds and cancer risks for sensitive receptors near the Project Site. Controlling fugitive dust, acquiring Tier II level construction equipment, to the extent available, |
59
|
properly maintaining construction equipment, turning off construction equipment when not in use and prohibiting idling for more than five minutes, controlling traffic around the Project Site, using low volatile organic compound paints applied using either high-volume low-pressure spray equipment or by hand, encouraging construction workers to carpool, providing on-site electrical hook-ups during construction, reducing the amount of dust which will be tracked off-site, limiting off-site construction improvements to an eight hour day during daylight hours, providing bicycle parking spaces and on-site showers, preferential parking for carpools and alternatively fueled vehicles, obtaining LEED, or if not available an approved program to achieve the same level of environmental benefit, certification for the Project, prohibiting access to trucks over 10,000 pounds which do not have an Engine Certification Label and establishing a buffer area on land immediately south of future Eucalyptus Avenue through a deed restriction will ensure that the risks associated with PM 2 . 5 and cancer will be mitigated into insignificance. Accordingly, The imposition of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-13, as set forth on pages 5.3-38-39 and -52 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-2-6 of the Final EIR, AQ-14 through AQ-21, set forth on pages 4-6-6 of the Final EIR, GCC-5(a), GCC-5(e) and GCC-9, set forth on pages 5.16-11-13, as modified on pages 4-19-20 of the Final EIR, Mitigation measures AQ-1 through AQ-21, GCC-5(a), GCC-5(e) and GCC-9, set forth on pages 5.3-38-39 and -52 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-2-5 and -19-20 of the Final EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. However, as set forth in the factual basis for the finding in subsection IV.C.3.a above, there are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the emissions of PM 10 associated with the grading and construction of Phase 1 of the Project to less than significant. |
d. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Cumulative contribution to air quality impacts |
60
Finding: | The development of the Project, in conjunction with related projects and that authorized by the Moreno Highlands Specific Plan, will result in significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts on VOC, NO X, CO, PM 10 and PM 2.5 . There are no mitigation measures which will reduce the impacts to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 6-8-10 of the Draft EIR, in the Air Quality and Health Risk Analysis Report, Appendix D.1 to the Draft EIR, Response 10-2, page 3-99 of the Final EIR and in subsections IV.C.3.a-c above, the air quality pollutants emitted during the operation of the Project, alone or in conjunction with those emitted by surrounding development, will be cumulatively significant. All feasible mitigation measures have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. The City will impose feasible mitigation measures on projects seeking approval within the future. However, the air quality problems that exist in the area of the Project are, in most cases, problems affecting the entirety of the South Coast air basin and, as such, are beyond the Citys control. |
a. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Cumulative adverse noise impacts |
Finding: | The development of the Project, in conjunction with the development of related projects and that authorized by the Moreno Highlands Specific Plan will result in significant and unavoidable cumulative noise impacts on houses located near SR-60. There are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the impacts to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 6-17-23 of the Draft EIR and in the Noise Assessment, Appendix I to the Draft EIR, the increase in noise due to the operation of the Project will be small. However, when added to that which can be expected by the use of vehicles on SR-60 from both related projects and the development of the Moreno Highlands Specific Plan area, the result will be that at least one residence east of Theodore Street and several residences located west of Redlands Boulevard will experience a noise increase of more than 3 dB with a future noise level above 65 CNEL, the Citys noise level for residential areas. There are no mitigation |
61
|
measures which will reduce the impacts to less than significant. |
a. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Hindrance or delay of Californias ability to meet the climate reduction targets contained in AB32 (Impact GCC-1) |
Finding: | The grading and construction associated with the Project will, after the application of all feasible mitigation measures, result in approximately 6,500 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2e ). The operation of the Project, after the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures, will produce approximately 81,800 metric tons of CO 2e per year. In the absence of any quantitative or qualitative threshold of significance for the emissions of CO 2e , it must be assumed that the amount of the emissions of CO 2e , both during the grading and construction associated with the Project and the operation of the Project will, individually and cumulatively, be a significant and unavoidable impact. There are no feasible mitigation measures which will reduce the impacts to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed in Section 5.16 and pages 6-40-41 of the Draft EIR and in the Climate Change Analysis, Appendix N to the Draft EIR, the grading and construction associated with the Project and the operation of the Project will generate substantial amounts of CO 2e emissions. There is, currently, neither a quantitative nor a qualitative threshold to be used to determine whether the amount of CO 2e emissions is significant. Various thresholds, ranging from no new contributions to over 40,000 metric tons per year, have been proposed. The staff of the South Coast Air Quality Management District has suggested a possible threshold of 10,000 tons of CO 2e per year for industrial projects but has not suggested a numerical threshold for non-industrial projects; the District has not yet acted on the proposal. However, the California Air Resources Board and the Office of Planning and Research are considering the adoption of a threshold of significance for CO 2e emissions but have not yet decided on that threshold. AB32 requires a reduction of approximately 30% in CO 2e emissions over business as usual by 2020 in order to reach the levels emitted in California in 1990. Irrespective of |
62
|
when or what standards will be adopted by the California Air Resources Board all feasible measures have been implemented in this project in compliance with AB-32. | |
|
||
|
Incorporating water conservation requirements, properly maintaining construction equipment, turning off construction equipment when not in use and prohibiting construction equipment from idling for more than five minutes, controlling traffic around the Project Site, encouraging construction workers to carpool, prohibiting truck idling for more than three minutes per day per truck, providing electricity in the loading area for transportation refrigeration units, designing the Project to meet 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency requirements, using cool roofs and cool paints, installing renewable energy generation on-site to meet the Projects Phase 1 office electricity needs, using ENERGY STAR-qualified energy efficient appliances, providing bicycle storage parking and showers for employees, installing Light Emitting Diodes in any traffic lights which are a part of the Project, providing pedestrian and bicycle connections to surrounding areas, establishing a Transportation Management Association to encourage and coordinate carpooling by occupants of the Project, providing preferential parking for carpools, vanpools and alternatively fueled vehicles, obtaining LEED certification or, if not available, a similar program to achieve the same level of environmental benefit, designing loading docks which will accommodate trucks utilizing SmartWay Truck Efficiency emission reduction features, and prohibiting access to trucks over 10,000 pounds which do not have an Engine Certification Label will ensure reduction in the amount of emissions of CO 2e . Accordingly, Mitigation Measures AQ-1, AQ-3, AQ-4, AQ-5, AQ-7, AQ-11, AQ-12 and GCC-1 through 10, set forth on pages 5.16-9-13 of the Draft EIR, as modified on pages 4-2-6 and -18-21 of the Final EIR, and GCC-11, set forth on page 4-21 of the Final EIR, have been imposed as conditions of approval of the Project. However, there |
63
|
are no additional feasible mitigation measures which would reduce the impact to less than significant. |
b. Significant Unavoidable Impact: | Impacts of climate change on the Project (Impact GCC-2) |
Finding: | Potential impacts of climate change include the exacerbation of air quality problems, reduction in the quality and supply of water from the Sierra snow pack, damage to the natural environment, reduction of in-state electricity production, and an increase in wildfires, all of which could adversely affect the Project. The imposition of Mitigation Measures W-1, which requires the preparation of a planting and irrigation plan for the Citys review and approval, GCC-1 through GCC-4, which require increased energy efficiency, the use of cool roofs and paints, the production of energy on-site through the use of alternate, renewable energy sources and the use of energy efficient appliances and systems, and GCC-9, which requires LEED credit in a number of areas, will reduce the Projects need for energy and water slightly but the impact of global climate change on the Project will continue to be significant and unavoidable. There are no mitigation measures which will reduce the impacts to less than significant. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 5.16-16-18 of the Draft EIR and the Climate Change Analysis, Appendix N to the Draft EIR, global climate change will affect the Project in various ways. Imposing the mitigation measures discussed in subsection IV.C.5 above will decrease the amounts of water and energy required by the Project after it is in operation but it, like all other projects in California, will be subject to the deleterious impacts of climate change. |
Finding: | There exists no reasonably feasible and available alternative site for the Project which would avoid or substantially lessen the significant impacts of the Project or to allow it to feasibly attain most of the Projects basic objectives. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 9-2-3 and -33-34 of the Draft EIR and in the letters from Darla Longo dated January 18, 2008, and October 7, 2008, Appendices O to the Draft and Final EIRs, an extensive search for |
64
|
reasonably feasible and available alternative sites was conducted. While eight potential sites were considered, six of the eight were found to be infeasible for failure to meet, at the initial threshold, one or more of Skecherss requirements for its business and logistics models, including, but not limited to, the ability to host a 1,800,000 sf facility together with the possibility of expansion later on a site immediately adjacent to a major freeway and within the geographic service area needed. One other potential site, in San Bernardino, met the threshold and was studied for feasibility, but it was concluded after study that the site could not be built in an efficient configuration for Skecherss operations. Therefore, no reasonably feasible and available alternative site in the Inland Empire could be found. Moreover, even if an alternative site could be found, the significant and unavoidable impacts, individually and cumulatively, on, at least, air quality and global climate change would not be reduced. Significant and unavoidable noise impacts, individually and cumulatively, are also unlikely to be reduced for any otherwise feasible site that would satisfy Skecherss needs. |
Finding: | The No Project No Development Alternative is environmentally superior to the Project but would not attain any of the objectives for the Project. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 9-3-9 and -36 of the Draft EIR, leaving the Project Site in its current condition would result in no impacts to the environment with the exception that the existing General Plans designation of the Project Site for development with commercial and industrial uses would not be satisfied. None of the Projects objectives would be met. |
Finding: | Developing the Project Site under the existing General Plan designation and zoning would allow for the development of 1,715,000 sf of business park and 410,000 sf of community commercial uses. The impacts on the environment of development pursuant to the existing General Plan designation and zoning would be roughly comparable to those which would result from the |
65
|
development of the Project. However, it would not meet any of Skecherss needs nor would it allow Skechers to have the logistics facility available in the very near future at any other reasonably feasible and available site. In addition, due to market conditions, development under the existing General Plan designation and zoning would not currently be feasible and therefore would delay any benefits that development of the Project Site would bring to the City, such as jobs and revenues. Likewise, it would not provide the Project applicant with an adequate rate of return on its investment because there is no market available for development of the Project Site consistent with the existing General Plan designation and zoning. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 9-9-19 and -36 of the Draft EIR and in the letter from Darla Longo dated February 12, 2008, Appendix O to the Final EIR, there is currently no market for the development of the Project Site consistent with the existing General Plan designation and zoning. The environmental impacts of development of the Project Site consistent with the existing General Plan designation and zoning are roughly comparable to those of the Project with the impacts on aesthetics, noise, public services and utilities being slightly less and those on air quality, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials and global climate change being slightly more. Developing the Project Site consistent with the existing General Plan designation and zoning would not allow the Project applicant to achieve its objectives because it would not be able to provide logistics facilities to Skechers, resulting in delay or denial of providing the City with new jobs and revenues from the development of the Project Site and precluding an adequate rate of return on its investment because there is simply no existing market for development of the Project Site consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning. |
Finding: | Developing the Project Site with 1,000,000 sf of logistics use and 200,000 sf of community commercial uses would result in environmental impacts which would be slightly less than those which would result from the development of the Project. However, a reduced density alternative would not allow the Project to attain a number of its basic objectives and would not reduce any |
66
|
significant unavoidable, environmental impact of the Project to a level of insignificance or to a level capable of mitigation to a level of insignificance and is therefore not significantly environmentally superior to the Project. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 9-19-26 and -36 of the Draft EIR, the environmental impacts of the reduced project would be marginally less than, or equal to, those of the Project. In particular, impacts on Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, and Population, Housing and Employment would be the same for the Reduced Density Alternative as for the Project, except that employment opportunities would be reduced. Reductions in most other impacts would be marginal to modest. Only reductions in impacts on Air Quality would be likely to be substantial. However, no significant unavoidable impact of the Project would be reduced to or made capable of mitigation to a level of insignificance. Also, the reduced density alternative would prevent achieving some of the Projects basic objectives. In particular, Skechers would not be provided the size and expandability required by its business objectives. Current market conditions would render the Reduced Density Alternative not reasonably feasible and therefore preclude the Project applicant from obtaining an adequate rate of return on its investment. |
Finding: | The normal construction alternative would have moderately fewer environmental impacts than the Project. However, it would not allow the Project to attain a number of its basic objectives and would not reduce any significant unavoidable environmental impact of the Project to a level of insignificance or to a level capable of mitigation to a level of insignificance and is therefore not significantly environmentally superior to the Project. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 9-27-33 and -36 of the Draft EIR, the normal construction schedule would have a moderately lesser environmental impact on aesthetics, air quality and noise during the construction phase but would otherwise be comparable to the impacts which would result from the development of the Project and make no difference in any impacts during the |
67
|
operation of the Project. However, Skechers would be delayed in consolidating its operations in a single logistics facility and the City would also be delayed in obtaining the jobs and revenues which the construction and operation of the Project will generate. Therefore, development of the Project Site with a normal construction schedule would delay achievement of most of the basic objectives of the Project and would not be significantly environmentally superior to the Project. |
Finding: | Alternatives consisting of development consistent with the existing General Plan designation and zoning, reduced density and a normal construction schedule represent a reasonable range of alternatives. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As discussed on pages 9-2-3 and -33-34 of the Draft EIR and in the letters from Darla Longo dated January 18, 2008, and October 7, 2008, Appendices O to the Draft and Final EIRs, an extensive search for reasonably feasible and available alternative sites was conducted. While eight potential sites were considered, six of the eight were found to be infeasible for failure to meet, at the initial threshold, one or more of Skechers requirements for its business and logistics models, including, but not limited to, the ability to host a 1,800,000 sf facility together with the possibility of expansion later on a site immediately adjacent to a major freeway and within the geographic service area needed. One other potential site, in San Bernardino, met the threshold and was studied for feasibility, but it was concluded after study that the site could not be built in an efficient configuration for Skecherss operations. Therefore, no reasonably feasible and available alternative site in the Inland Empire could be found. Moreover, even if an alternative site could be found, the significant and unavoidable impacts, individually and cumulatively, on, at least, air quality and global climate change would not be reduced. Significant and unavoidable noise impacts, individually and cumulatively, are also likely to not be |
68
|
reduced for any site truly feasible for Skecherss objectives. | |
|
||
|
Because, there are no reasonably feasible and available alternative sites, development consistent with the existing General Plan designation and zoning, reduced density and a normal construction schedule represent a reasonable range of alternatives. The purpose of the Guidelines requirements of studying a reasonable range of alternatives would not be met by constructing additional alternatives that would not meet the basic objectives of the Project. Because Skechers needs are specific as to size, expandability, location and transport accessibility, and without alternative sites as an option, no other alternatives appear feasible which would not defeat at least one basic Project objective. |
69
Finding: | Notwithstanding the significant unavoidable impacts to aesthetics discussed in subsection IV.C.1 above, the development of otherwise unusable land, the creation of jobs by the Project, the multiplier effect which will create secondary jobs to support the Project and those who work in it, the demonstration that the City is eager to attract new business opportunities and the fact that the Project will be LEED certified or, if LEED certification is not available, a similar program to achieve the same level of environmental benefit, will also demonstrate the Citys commitment to green technology constitutes benefits which outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts to aesthetics. Each of the benefits, individually, constitutes a sufficient basis for approving the Project notwithstanding the significant and unavoidable impact on aesthetics which will result. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As set forth in the Project Objectives on pages 3-2 and 5.12-2 of the Draft EIR the letter from Darla Longo dated February 12, 2008, Appendix O to the Final EIR, the Fiscal Impact Study dated October 23, 2008, and the Economic Impact Study dated October 24, 2008, the approval of the Project will allow the conversion of vacant, marginally productive agricultural land, into a job and revenues producing facility. It will allow Skechers to consolidate its operations from five existing buildings in Ontario into one building in the City which will, in the short run, generate approximately 600 construction jobs and over 1,050 new jobs in the City in Phase 1 operation of the project and, in the long run, the development of the Project will generate approximately 2,000 new jobs in the City associated with the Project, all of which will help |
70
|
adjust the unfavorable jobs/housing balance which currently exists. Further, the construction of Phase 1 of the Project will generate approximately 250 secondary jobs in the City while the operation of the Project will, generate approximately 530 secondary jobs in the City and over additional 1,000 secondary jobs in the County providing goods and services to the Project and to those who work on the Project Site. Once in operation, the Project will generate over $900,000 annually in net revenues to the City. |
Finding: | Notwithstanding the significant unavoidable impacts to agricultural resources discussed in subsection IV.C.2. above, the development of otherwise unusable land, the creation of jobs by the Project, the multiplier effect which will create secondary jobs to support the Project and those who work in it, the demonstration that the City is eager to attract new business opportunities and the fact that the Project will be LEED certified or, if LEED certification is not available, a similar program to achieve the same level of environmental benefit, will also demonstrate the Citys commitment to green technology constitutes benefits which outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts to agricultural resources. Each of the benefits, individually, constitutes a sufficient basis for approving the Project notwithstanding the significant and unavoidable impact on agricultural resources which will result. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As set forth in the Project objectives on pages 3-2 and 5.12-2 of the Draft EIR the letter from Darla Longo dated February 12, 2008, Appendix O to the Final EIR, the Fiscal Impact Study dated October 23, 2008, and the Economic Impact Study dated October 24, 2008, the approval of the Project will allow the conversion of vacant, marginally productive agricultural land, into a job and revenues producing facility. It will allow Skechers to consolidate its operations from five existing buildings in Ontario into one building in the City which will, in the short run, generate approximately 600 construction jobs and over 1,050 new jobs in the City in Phase 1 operation of the project and, in the long run, the development of the Project will generate approximately 2,000 new jobs in the City associated with the Project, all of which will help |
71
|
adjust the unfavorable jobs/housing balance which currently exists. Further, the construction of Phase 1 of the Project will generate approximately 250 secondary jobs in the City while the operation of the Project will, generate approximately 530 secondary jobs in the City and over additional 1,000 secondary jobs in the County providing goods and services to the Project and to those who work on the Project Site. Once in operation, the Project will generate over $900,000 annually in net revenues to the City. |
Finding: | Notwithstanding the significant unavoidable impacts to air quality discussed in subsection IV.C.3. above, the development of otherwise unusable land, the creation of jobs by the Project, the multiplier effect which will create secondary jobs to support the Project and those who work in it, the demonstration that the City is eager to attract new business opportunities and the fact that the Project will be LEED certified or, if LEED certification is not available, a similar program to achieve the same level of environmental benefit, will also demonstrate the Citys commitment to green technology constitutes benefits which outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts to air quality. Each of the benefits, individually, constitutes a sufficient basis for approving the Project notwithstanding the significant and unavoidable impact on air quality which will result. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As set forth in the Project objectives on pages 3-2 and 5.12-2 of the Draft EIR the letter from Darla Longo dated February 12, 2008, Appendix O to the Final EIR, the Fiscal Impact Study dated October 23, 2008, and the Economic Impact Study dated October 24, 2008, the approval of the Project will allow the conversion of vacant, marginally productive agricultural land, into a job and revenues producing facility. It will allow Skechers to consolidate its operations from five existing buildings in Ontario into one building in the City which will, in the short run, generate approximately 600 construction jobs and over 1,050 new jobs in the City in Phase 1 operation of the project and, in the long run, the development of the Project will generate approximately 2,000 new jobs in the City associated with the Project, all of which will help |
72
|
adjust the unfavorable jobs/housing balance which currently exists. Further, the construction of Phase 1 of the Project will generate approximately 250 secondary jobs in the City while the operation of the Project will, generate approximately 530 secondary jobs in the City and over additional 1,000 secondary jobs in the County providing goods and services to the Project and to those who work on the Project Site. Once in operation, the Project will generate over $900,000 annually in net revenues to the City. |
Finding: | Notwithstanding the significant unavoidable noise impacts discussed in subsection IV.C.4. above, the development of otherwise unusable land, the creation of jobs by the Project, the multiplier effect which will create secondary jobs to support the Project and those who work in it, the demonstration that the City is eager to attract new business opportunities and the fact that the Project will be LEED certified or, if LEED certification is not available, a similar program to achieve the same level of environmental benefit, will also demonstrate the Citys commitment to green technology constitutes benefits which outweigh the unavoidable adverse noise impacts. Each of the benefits, individually, constitutes a sufficient basis for approving the Project notwithstanding the significant and unavoidable impact on noise which will result. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As set forth in the Project objectives on pages 3-2 and 5.12-2 of the Draft EIR the letter from Darla Longo dated February 12, 2008, Appendix O to the Final EIR, the Fiscal Impact Study dated October 23, 2008, and the Economic Impact Study dated October 24, 2008, the approval of the Project will allow the conversion of vacant, marginally productive agricultural land, into a job and revenues producing facility. It will allow Skechers to consolidate its operations from five existing buildings in Ontario into one building in the City which will, in the short run, generate approximately 600 construction jobs and over 1,050 new jobs in the City in Phase 1 operation of the project and, in the long run, the development of the Project will generate approximately 2,000 new jobs in the City associated with the Project, all of which will help adjust the unfavorable jobs/housing balance which |
73
|
currently exists. Further, the construction of Phase 1 of the Project will generate approximately 250 secondary jobs in the City while the operation of the Project will, generate approximately 530 secondary jobs in the City and over additional 1,000 secondary jobs in the County providing goods and services to the Project and to those who work on the Project Site. Once in operation, the Project will generate over $900,000 annually in net revenues to the City. |
Finding: | Notwithstanding the significant unavoidable climate change and greenhouse gases impacts discussed in subsection IV.C.5. above, the development of otherwise unusable land, the creation of jobs by the Project, the multiplier effect which will create secondary jobs to support the-Project and those who work in it, the demonstration that the City is eager to attract new business opportunities and the fact that the Project will be LEED certified or, if LEED certification is not available, a similar program to achieve the same level of environmental benefit, will also demonstrate the Citys commitment to green technology constitutes benefits which outweigh the unavoidable adverse impact on global climate change. Each of the benefits, individually, constitutes a sufficient basis for approving the Project notwithstanding the significant and unavoidable impact on climate change and greenhouse gases which will result. |
Factual Basis for the Finding: | As set forth in the Project objectives on pages 3-2 and 5.12-2 of the Draft EIR the letter from Darla Longo dated February 12, 2008, Appendix O to the Final EIR, the Fiscal Impact Study dated October 23, 2008, and the Economic Impact Study dated October 24, 2008, the approval of the Project will allow the conversion of vacant, marginally productive agricultural land, into a job and revenues producing facility. It will allow Skechers to consolidate its operations from five existing buildings in Ontario into one building in the City which will, in the short run, generate approximately 600 construction jobs and over 1,050 new jobs in the City in Phase 1 operation of the project and, in the long run, the development of the Project will generate approximately 2,000 new jobs in the City associated with the Project, all of which will help adjust the unfavorable jobs/housing balance which |
74
|
currently exists. Further, the construction of Phase 1 of the Project will generate approximately 250 secondary jobs in the City while the operation of the Project will, generate approximately 530 secondary jobs in the City and over additional 1,000 secondary jobs in the County providing goods and services to the Project and to those who work on the Project Site. Once in operation, the Project will generate over $900,000 annually in net revenues to the City. |
75
76
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
| To provide assurance and documentation that mitigation measures are implemented as planned; | ||
| To collect analytical data to assist City administration in its determination of the effectiveness of the adopted mitigation measures; | ||
| To report periodically regarding project compliance with mitigation measures, performance standards and/or other conditions; and | ||
| To make available to the public, upon request, the City record of compliance with project mitigation measures. |
The project site and relevant off-site areas encompass a total of approximately 265.3 acres, development of the site includes approximately 2,420,000 square feet devoted to light industrial logistics uses, and 200,000 square feet of commercial uses. The proposed project includes a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), a Change of Zone (CZ), a Plot Plan (PP), and a General Plan Amendment (GPA). The Parcel Map would create parcels for two logistics buildings, two commercial projects, and future SR-60 right-of-way. The parcel map would also establish the dedications for required improvements. The Change of Zone would change 6.7 acres of Community Commercial to Light Industrial. The Plot Plan would provide the site plan for the logistics building. The GPA widens the commercial area on the west, reduces the commercial area on the east, and |
77
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
| Introduction Provides an overview of CEQAs monitoring and reporting requirements, program objectives, the project for which the program has been prepared, and the manner in which the mitigation monitoring program has been organized. | ||
| MMP Describes the City entities responsible for implementation of the mitigation monitoring plan, the plan scope, procedures for monitoring and reporting, public availability of documents, the process for making changes to the program, types of mitigation measures, and the manner in which monitoring will be coordinated to ensure implementation of mitigation measures. | ||
| Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Summary Outlines the impacts and mitigation measures, responsible entities, and the timing for monitoring and reporting for each mitigation measure included in the plan. |
78
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
| The City distributes reporting forms to the appropriate City Department (as indicated on the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting forms) or employs the offices existing reporting process for verification of compliance. | ||
| Responsible entities verify compliance by signing the monitoring and reporting form and/or documenting compliance using their own internal procedures when monitoring is triggered. | ||
| Responsible entities provide the City with verification that monitoring has been conducted and ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. |
79
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
| Appropriate mitigation measures would be included in construction documents. | ||
| Departments with reporting responsibilities would review the Final Environmental Impact Report, which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified mitigation measures. | ||
| Problems or exceptions to compliance would be addressed by the City as appropriate. | ||
| Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance with mitigation measures. |
80
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
81
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
speeds in excess of 25 mph.
|
||||||||||||||||
A Large Operation notification
shall be submitted to the SCAQMD prior to
construction.
|
||||||||||||||||
Project applicant to designate a to
designate a person(s) to monitor the dust control
program and to
order increased watering, as necessary.
|
||||||||||||||||
Post a sign with the telephone
number and person to
contact regarding dust complaints. The person shall
take corrective action within 24 hours.
|
||||||||||||||||
Complete all roadways, driveways,
sidewalks, etc.
as soon as possible; building pads should be
developed as soon as possible after grading unless
seeding, polymer, water, landscaping, soil binders,
or similar means are applied within five working
days after grading completion to minimize fugitive
dust.
|
||||||||||||||||
Street sweeping shall be accomplished
as needed to
remove soil transport to adjacent areas; sweeping
shall require use of equipment certified under
SCAQMD Rule 1186.1.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-2.
The project applicant shall meet CARB
standards by assuring use of lowest emission
construction equipment reasonably available for use on
this project. The construction fleet average shall meet
or exceed Tier II level and the applicant shall provide
incentives in the bidding process in selecting
construction contractors that propose the lowest-
emission construction equipment(i.e., high pressure
injectors; smaller engine sizes; electric equipment;
gasoline powered equipment with catalytic converters;
and alternatively fueled construction equipment).
The applicant shall also provide incentives in the bidding process in selecting grading and construction contractors that propose the use of equipment using Level III diesel particulate filters. |
Applicant, Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Land Development Division |
Prior to Construction
During Onsite/Offsite Construction (Provide evidence that this has been certified at occupancy) |
82
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM AQ-3.
During project construction,
construction equipment shall be properly maintained in
accordance
with manufacturers specifications; maintenance shall
include proper tuning and timing of engines. During
maintenance, precautions shall be taken to ensure that
fuel is not leaked onto the ground. Equipment
maintenance records and equipment design
specification data sheets shall be kept onsite during
construction and subject to inspection by the
SCAQMD.
|
Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division, Public Works. Land Development Division, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District | Onsite/Offsite Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-4.
During project construction, the project
applicant shall require all contractors to turn off all
construction equipment and delivery vehicles when not
in use or prohibit idling in excess of five (5) minutes.
|
Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley, Building and Safety Division | Onsite/Offsite Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-5.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the
project applicant shall provide a traffic control plan
to the City of Moreno Valley that will describe in
detail safe detours around the project construction site
with
temporary traffic control (e.g., flag person) during
construction-related truck hauling activities, as
required by the City. Construction activities that affect
traffic flow on the arterial system shall be minimized
by scheduling such activities to off-peak hours.
Construction truck travel shall be routed to minimize
travel on congested streets and near to sensitive
receptor areas. Construction traffic shall gain access to
the project site via Theodore Street and Eucalyptus
Avenue to the greatest extent possible to minimize
traffic and dust along Redlands Boulevard. The traffic
control plan is primarily intended as a safety measure
but also can minimize traffic congestion and delays
that increase idling and acceleration emissions. The
traffic control plan shall be prepared in accordance
with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
Highways Administration Rule on Work Zone Safety
23 CFR 630 Subpart J, Developing and Implementing
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Transportation Engineering Division | Prior to issuance of a grading permit |
83
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
Traffic Management Plans for Work Zones.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-6.
All paints shall be low
VOC paints and applied using
either high volume low-pressure
(HVLP) spray equipment or by hand
application. For a list of low VOC
paints, refer to the website
www.aqmd.gov/prdas/brochures/paintguide.html.
|
Applicant, Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley, Building and Safety Division | Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-7A.
Construction Phases.
Prior to
the issuance of grading permits, the
developer shall provide documentation to
the City of Moreno Valley indicating that
construction workers will be encouraged
to carpool to the greatest extent
practical, including providing
information on park and ride programs
available to workers. The project shall
also provide for lunch services onsite
during construction to minimize the need
for offsite vehicle trips. Workers shall
be informed in writing and a letter
placed on file at the City of Moreno
Valley documenting the efforts to
encourage carpooling.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, |
Prior to
issuance
of grading
permits
Construction |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-7B. Occupancy.
Prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits, the project applicant
shall provide documentation to the City of
Moreno Valley indicating that tenant workers
will be encouraged to carpool to the
greatest extent practical including
providing information on park and ride
programs available to employees. Employees
shall be informed in writing and a letter
placed on file at the City of Moreno Valley
documenting the efforts to encourage
carpooling.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-8.
During project construction,
onsite electrical hook-ups shall be
provided for electric construction tools
including saws, drills and compressors,
to minimize the need for diesel powered
electric generators.
|
Applicant, Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley, Building and Safety Division | Construction |
84
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM AQ-9.
During construction, rumble or
bumper scrips or similar best management practices
shall be provided where vehicles enter and exit the
construction site onto paved roads, or wash off
trucks or any equipment leaving the site with each
trip.
|
Applicant, Construction Supervision | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works Land Development Division | Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM-AQ-10.
Offsite construction improvements shall
be limited to an 8-hour day during daylight hours.
|
Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley Public Works Land Development Division | Offsite Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Operations
MM AQ-11. All project entrances shall be posted with signs which state:
a) Diesel trucks servicing the project
shall not idle for more than 3 minutes; and
b) Telephone numbers of the building
facilities manager and the California Air Resources
Board to report violations.
|
Applicant, Tenants | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division and Building and Safety Division | Prior to issuance of occupancy permits/Operation | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-12.
Electricity shall be provided in the
loading dock areas for transportation refrigeration
units visiting the site, if any.
|
Applicant, Tenants | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division and Building and Safety Division | Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy/ Operation |
85
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM AQ-13.
A deed restricted area to the
south of the project property line, precluding the
establishment of sensitive receptors, is required.
The documents necessary to execute the deed
restriction shall be submitted to the City of
Moreno Valley prior to the issuance of a building
permit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, the area depicted on Exhibit 5.3-1
Proposed Buffer Area from the southern property
line of the project between Redlands Boulevard and
Theodore Street shall be deed-restricted in a
manner acceptable to the City of Moreno Valley to
preclude the establishment of sensitive receptors
including residences, hospitals, convalescent
homes, day-care centers, and schools within this
area.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division |
Submittal of Deed
Restriction
Documents Prior to
Issuance of
Building Permits
Execution of Deed Restrictions. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-14.
Electrical hookups shall be provided for
transport refrigeration units within the
Commercial component (Phases II and III) to
eliminate the need for idling of diesel-powered
transport refrigeration units.
|
Applicant, Tenants | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division and Building and Safety Division | Plot Plan Approval/Prior to Occupancy Permits | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-15.
The project applicant shall include in
all new lease documents the requirement that the
tenants shall utilize only trucks using
refrigeration units capable of utilizing
electrical hook-ups for deliveries to the tenant.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | Operation (Written Documentation shall be provided) | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-16.
The project applicant shall encourage its
tenants to do the following: have a compressed
workweek schedule for its employees; include
electric powered and/or compressed natural gas
fueled trucks and/or vehicles in fleets; require
or provide incentives to use California Air
Resources Board certified particulate filters that
meet level III requirements; use clean trucks,
such as 2007 or newer model year or 2010
compliant; use electric yard trucks; use trucks
with a SmartWay 1.25 rating; and electrify
auxiliary power units. The applicant shall provide
documentation of its efforts to the satisfaction
of the City.
|
Applicant, Tenants | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | Operation |
86
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM AQ-17.
The project shall be designed
such that the check-in point for trucks is
inside the facility property to ensure that
there are no trucks queuing outside the
facility.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, and Transportation Engineering Division | Plot Plan Review/ Approval | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-18.
Food services shall be provided onsite.
|
Applicant, Tenants | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | Onsite Construction, Operation | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-19.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy
Permits, written evidence shall be provided to
the Planning and Transportation Engineering
Divisions that the project applicant shall
include in all new lease documents the
requirement that the tenant shall provide
employees with incentives for carpooling or
impose a parking fee.
|
Applicant, Tenant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division and Transportation Engineering Division | Written Evidence of Compliance Shall Be Provided at Occupancy/Operation | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-20.
The property owners association
shall maximize use of electrical equipment
for landscape maintenance.
|
Applicant, Tenants | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | Operation | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM AQ-21.
Prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for Phase 3, traffic
signals, including interconnect hardware
installed, or paid for, in whole or in part,
by the project applicant shall be synchronized
by the applicant, to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
|
City of Moreno Valley | City of Moreno Valley, Transportation Engineering Division | Prior to Certificate of Occupancy For Phase III. |
87
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
Biological Resources
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM BR-1.
To avoid
impacts to nesting birds
covered under the MBTA,
vegetation removal
activities involving
established perennial
vegetation located in
the urban/developed
plant community shall be
avoided during avian
nesting season (February
15 through August 31).
If the nesting season
cannot be avoided, a
nesting bird survey
shall be provided no
more than thirty (30)
days prior to vegetation
removal activities. If
no active nests are
observed, construction
activity may proceed
with no further
monitoring. If active
nests are observed, a
biological monitor shall
be present during any
construction activity
within the vicinity of
the nest. Construction
activity may encroach
within the vicinity of
the nesting birds at the
discretion of the
biological monitor.
Construction activity
may proceed once the
nestlings have fledged
the nest.
|
Applicant, Consulting Biologist | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM BR-2.
Prior to issuance
of a grading permit, the
applicant shall pay the
mandatory mitigation fee
for the SKRHCP. The
mitigation fee is a
per/acre fee based on the
entire property footprint
and is used to purchase
land that contains
occupied Stephens
kangaroo rat habitat for
the purpose of conserving
a large core population.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit |
88
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Finish Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
MM BR-3.
A pre-construction clearance survey for
burrowing owl shall be provided. The pre-construction
survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no
more than thirty (30) days prior to any grading or ground
disturbing activities.
If construction is to be initiated during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) and burrowing owl is determined to occupy any portion of the study area during the 30-day pre-construction survey, consultation with the CDFG and USFWS shall take place and no construction activity shall take place within 500 feet of an active nest/burrow until it has been determined that the nest/burrow is no longer active, and all juveniles have fledged the nest/burrow. No disturbance to active burrows shall occur without appropriate permitting through the MBTA and/or CDFG. If active burrowing owl burrows are detected outside the breeding season (September through January), or within the breeding season but owls are not nesting or in the process of nesting, passive relocation may be conducted following consultation with the CDFG and USFWS. Construction activity may occur within 500 feet of the active nests at the discretion of the biological monitor. |
Applicant,
Consulting Biologist |
City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM BR-4.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the
applicant shall pay the mandatory mitigation fee for the
MSHCP. The mitigation fee is a per unit fee based on
the residential development and a per square feet fee
based on commercial or industrial development. This will
satisfy mitigation required for Impact 5.4-5 and
5.4-6.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit |
89
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Finish Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
Cultural Resources
MMCR-1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a City-approved Project Archaeologist shall be retained to initiate and supervise cultural resource mitigation- monitoring during project-related earthmoving in all areas of the project, subject to certain constraints found in MM CR-2. |
Applicant, Construction
Supervisor, Consulting Archaeologist |
City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit (Provide document for review prior to issuance of a Grading Permit) | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM CR-2.
Project-related archaeological
monitoring shall include the following
constraints:
|
Applicant, Consulting
Archaeologist, Construction Supervisor |
City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | During Grading | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
1. All
construction-related earthmoving
shall be monitored to a depth of ten (10)
feet below grade by the Project Archaeologist
or his/her designated representative;
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
2. Once 50 percent of the earth to
be moved
has been examined by the Project Archaeologist, the
Project Archaeologist may, at his or her
discretion, terminate monitoring if and only
if no buried cultural resources have been
detected;
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
3. If buried cultural resources
are detected
during monitoring, monitoring must continue
until 100 percent of virgin earth within the study
area has been disturbed and inspected by the
Project Archaeologist or his/her designated
representative.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
4. Grading shall cease in the area of a
cultural artifact or potential cultural
artifact as delineated by the Project
Archaeologist or his/her designated representative.
Grading should continue in other areas of the site
while particular find are investigated;
and
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
5. If cultural artifacts are uncovered
during grading, they shall be examined by a
professional archaeologist subject to MM CR-3,
and decisions shall be made as to mitigation,
treatment and/or
|
90
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Monitoring | |||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Finish Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||
disposition in consultation with the culturally affiliated
Tribe(s), as determined by the City. A mitigation-monitoring report must accompany the artifacts. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
MM CR-3.
Should buried prehistoric cultural resources be encountered during monitoring, the resources shall be evaluated for significance in consultation with the culturally affiliated Tribe(s), as determined by the City, following CEQA Guidelines prior to continuance of grading in the area.
|
Applicant, Construction Supervisor, Consulting Archaeologist | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | During Grading | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
MMCR-4.
The City of Moreno Valley shall designate culturally affiliated Tribe(s) to monitor the project. Qualified representatives of the Tribal Group(s) shall be granted access to the project site to monitor all activities monitored by the Project Archaeologist.
|
City of Moreno Valley, Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
MM CR-5.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a City-approved Project Paleontologist shall be retained to initiate and supervise paleontological mitigation-monitoring in all areas of the project, subject to certain constraints found below:
|
Applicant, Construction Supervisor, Consulting Paleontologist | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division, and Land Development Division of the Public Works Department | Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits, During Grading | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
1. Once excavations reach ten (10) feet in depth, monitoring of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontologic resources by a qualified paleontologic monitor or his/her representative must take place.
|
||||||||||||||
2. Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates.
|
||||||||||||||
3. Monitors shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens, and,
|
||||||||||||||
4. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially
|
91
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||
fossiliferous units described herein are not present, or, if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontologic personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources.
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
MM CR-6.
Although considered unlikely, there is always the possibility that ground-disturbing activities may uncover previously unknown human remains. Should this occur, Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code applies, and the following procedures shall be followed.
|
Applicant/Construction Supervisor | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | During Grading | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, California Health & Safety Code 7050.5 and California Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project-related earthmoving begins and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
1 . There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until a determination as to disposition and treatment is made. The Riverside County Coroner shall be contacted to determine if the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is
required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours to allow the NAHC to identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD may make recommendations and enter into consultation with the landowner, for means of
treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in PRC Section 5097.98.
|
92
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
Geology and Soils
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
The project will be subject to the Citys Grading Ordinance
and all applicable California Building Codes.
MM GEO-1. During excavation and grading activities a qualified engineering geologist shall observe the in-grading excavation to confirm the absence of any fault features within the building site. If any currently unknown fault features are observed, such features shall be evaluated by the geologist and, if determined necessary, remediation measures or other measures as appropriate shall be implemented to address such features in accordance with applicable City and State requirements. The geologists record of observations shall be summarized in a final report to be submitted to the City at the conclusion of excavation/grading activities. |
Applicant, Consulting Geologist | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, Building and Safety Division, and Public Works Land Development Division | Onsite Construction During Grading | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM
HH-1.
The fire protection system shall be designed per
National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 13 to provide an Early
Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) sprinkler system protection.
Temperature rating of sprinkler heads to be per the Fire
Departments requirements.
|
Applicant, Tenant | City of Moreno Valley Fire Department, Building and Safety Division | Plan Check Review/Approval | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM HH-2.
A complete on-site fire protection underground system
shall be provided per NFPA 24 and specific requirements of the local
authorities. This system shall include hydrants, sectional valves,
backflow prevention, and Fire Department connections.
|
Applicant, Tenant | City of Moreno Valley Fire Department, Building and Safety Division | Plan Check Review/Approval |
93
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
MM HH-3.
Riser assemblies shall include mechanical
alarm valves. System control valves shall either be
riser mounted with wall post extensions or exterior post
indicator valves as required by the local authority. All
required devices for central station alarm system
interface shall be provided.
|
Applicant, Tenant | City of Moreno Valley Fire Department, Building and Safety Division | Plan Check Review/Approval | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM HH-4.
System design, material, and installation
shall comply with NFPA 13 and the other previous NFPA
standards. It shall also comply with CBC and UFC
standards. Approvals will also be obtained from the
owners insurance authority.
|
Applicant, Tenant | City of Moreno Valley Fire Department, Building and Safety Division | Plan Check Review/Approval | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Land Use and Planning
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM LU-1.
A deed restricted area to the south of the
project property line, precluding the establishment of
sensitive receptors, is required. The documents
necessary to execute the deed restriction shall be
submitted to the City of Moreno Valley prior to the
issuance of a building permit. Prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, the area depicted on Exhibit
5.3-1 Proposed Buffer Area from the southern property
line of the project between Redlands Boulevard and
Theodore Street shall be deed-restricted in a manner
acceptable to the City of Moreno Valley to preclude the
establishment of sensitive receptors including
residences, hospitals, convalescent homes, day-care
centers, and schools within this area. (MM AQ-13)
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division |
Submittal of Deed
Restriction
Documents Prior to
Issuance of
Building Permits
Execution of Deed Restrictions Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy |
94
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
Noise
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Temporary Impacts Due to Construction Noise
MM N-1. No Construction Vehicles on Redlands Boulevard south of Future Eucalyptus Avenue, Other than construction vehicles necessary for identified offsite improvements within Redlands Boulevard, no construction vehicles shall be allowed in the vicinity of any residences on Redlands Boulevard south of existing Fir/future Eucalyptus Avenue. The prohibition for construction traffic shall apply to all phases of the proposed project. |
Applicant,
Construction Supervisor |
City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Land Development Division | Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM N-2
. No Nighttime Grading within 1,200
Feet of Residences south of Future
Eucalyptus Avenue. City grading hours are
from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through
Friday. No grading activities shall occur
at night
(8 p.m. to 7 a.m.)
within 1,200
feet from any noise-sensitive land uses
(i.e. occupied residences including yard
areas, schools, etc.) located south of
SR-60 (Exhibit 5.11-6 shows the current
location of occupied residences). Prior to
the issuance of a grading permit, the
project applicant shall submit a Noise
Reduction Compliance Plan (NRCP) to the
City as part of the grading permit
submittal showing the limits of nighttime
construction based on the location of
occupied residential dwellings and their
associated parcels, and other noise
sensitive uses. The limits of nighttime
grading shall be shown on the NRCP and
grading plan submitted to the City.
The limits of construction allowed at night shall be staked or posted on site, and contractors will be provided with a copy of the plan showing the limits of nighttime construction. In the event any new residential units or other noise sensitive land uses are built and occupied in the |
Applicant,
Construction Supervisor |
City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division and Public Works Land Development Division | Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit, Pre-Construction and During Construction |
95
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
vicinity of the project
site prior to completion of
Phase 1 construction,
nighttime construction and
grading activities shall be
prohibited within 1,200
feet of such residences.
Compliance shall be
demonstrated through a
modification of the NRCP.
With the implementation of this mitigation measure, the loudest noise level that would be experienced at any developed residential parcel would be less than 55 dBA (Leq) during the nighttime, and this level would be consistent with the limits established in the Citys Noise Ordinance. Compliance with these standards during Phase 1 construction of the project should be assured through the Noise Reduction Compliance Plan (NRCP) and periodic monitoring of noise levels at developed residential parcels within 1,200 feet of the project site. |
96
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM N-3.
Daytime
Construction Noise.
City grading hours
are from 7 a.m. to 6
p.m., Monday through
Friday. If project
site grading
activities must occur
within 560 feet of
noise-sensitive land
uses during the
daytime
(7 a.m. to 8
p.m.),
then temporary
sound barriers of
sufficient height and
density to reduce
daytime noise levels
to 60 dBA (Leq) or
less shall be placed
between the grading
activities and the
noise-sensitive land
uses. Prior to the
issuance of a grading
permit, the developer
shall submit a NRCP
to the City as part
of the grading permit
submittal showing the
limits of daytime
construction based on
the 560 foot setback
in relation to the
location of occupied
residential dwellings
and their associated
parcels and other
noises sensitive
uses.
In the event any new residential units or other noise sensitive land uses are built and occupied in the vicinity of the project site prior to completion of Phase 1 construction, the NRCP shall be modified to show a the revised new 560 foot setback for day time construction and grading activities in relation to the new residences. With the implementation of this mitigation measure the loudest noise level that would be experienced at any developed residential parcel would be less than 60 dBA (Leq) during the daytime, and these levels would be consistent with the limits established in the Citys Noise Ordinance. Compliance with these standards during Phase 1 construction of the project should be assured through the NRCP and periodic monitoring of noise levels at developed residential parcels within 560 feet of the project site. This mitigation measure does not apply to off-site construction. |
Applicant,
Construction Supervisor |
City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division and Public Works Land Development Division | Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit, Pre-Construction and Construction |
97
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM
N-4
. Require Equipment Maintenance. All
construction equipment shall be maintained
in good working order and fitted with the
appropriate silencers, mufflers or acoustic
covers where applicable.
|
Applicant,
Construction Supervisor |
City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, Building and Safety Division | During Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM N-5
. Locate Material Stockpiles 1,200
Feet from Residences south of the Freeway.
Material stockpiles shall be located at
least 1,200 feet from residences south of
future Eucalyptus Avenue along Theodore
Street and Redlands Boulevard. Remotely
locating the stockpiles reduces the noise
at the residences from equipment traveling
to and from the stockpiles and the noise
that is sometimes associated with bandling
of material.
|
Applicant,
Construction Supervisor |
City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Land Development Division, and the Building and Safety Division | Pre-Construction and Construction | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Transportation and Traffic
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM TT-1
. Prior to issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy for Phase 1. turn lanes shall be
improved along Theodore Street at SR-60 and
at Eucalyptus Avenue: In addition, minor
pavement shall be added to the Eastbound
and West bound State Route 60 Freeway ramp
intersections with Theodore Street to
accommodate truck turning movements. These
proposed improvements should enhance safety
and improve mobility between the freeway
and Eucalyptus Avenue.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Transportation Engineering Division | Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM TT-2
. Concurrent with the submittal of
the plot plan for Phase 3 of the proposed
project, the project applicant shall submit
a supplemental traffic study assessing the
projects contribution to the traffic
impacts at the Redlands Boulevard
intersection with SR-60 ramps, as well as
Theodore Street at SR-60. Approval of the
supplemental traffic study must occur prior
to the approval of entitlements for the
Phase 3 Plot Plan. The project applicant
shall contribute to the costs of the
interim intersection improvements required
to provide adequate capacity for all phases
of the
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Transportation Engineering Division | Phase 3 Plot Plan Review, Prior to Issuance of Building Permits for Phase 3 |
98
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
project. Said contribution shall be
on a fair-share basis considering
the buildout of adjacent areas.
Payment of such costs shall be
provided prior to the issuance of
a building permit for Phase 3. If
the timing of Phase 3 of the
project precedes the planned
interim improvements, the project
shall be required to construct
interim improvements needed to
provide-adequate capacity to serve
the project.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM TT-3
. The project
applicant shall construct the
easterly leg of the intersection
located at Redlands Boulevard and
Eucalyptus Avenue at the ultimate
design required to provide
adequate capacity for all phases
of the project and buildout of the
adjacent areas. The design
tentatively consists of a
dedicated westbound left turn
lane, two westbound through lanes
and a dedicated westbound right
turn lane. Final geometrics shall
be determined after receiving the
supplemental traffic study
identified in
MM TT 2.
Construction of required
improvements shall be completed
prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits for Phase 3 of the
project.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Transportation Engineering Division | Phase 3, Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM TT(C)-1.
Prior to issuance of
certificate of occupancy for Phase
1 of the project, turn lanes shall
be provided along Theodore Street
at SR-60 and at Eucalyptus Avenue.
In addition, minor pavement shall
be added to the Eastbound and West
bound State Route 60 Freeway ramp
intersections with Theodore Street
to accommodate truck turning
movements These proposed
improvements should enhance safety
and improve mobility between the
freeway and Eucalyptus Avenue.
|
Applicant, City of Moreno Valley | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Transportation Engineering Division, Riverside County Transportation Department | Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM TT(C)-2
. The short-range
analysis shows project impacts at
the Redlands Boulevard interchange
and at the Redlands
Boulevard/Eucalyptus Avenue
intersection. At the interchange,
improvements are planned and the
project shall participate on a
fair share
|
Applicant, City of Moreno Valley | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Transportation Engineering |
Phase 3 Plot Plan
Review (or As Determined By MM TT-2) |
99
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
basis if private funding is
needed. If the timing of
Phase 3 of the project
precedes the planned
interchange improvements,
the project shall contribute
to interim improvement to
provide adequate capacity
until the ultimate
improvements are completed.
These interim improvements
include additions of left
and right turn lanes at
Redlands Boulevard, SR 60
Ramps, and Eucalyptus
Avenue. The interim
improvements would be the
shared responsibility of the
proposed project and
cumulative projects. Fair
share participation and/or
contribution to interim
improvements, as applicable,
shall be required prior to
the issuance of a building
permit for Phase 3 of the
project.
|
Division, Riverside
County Transportation Department |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM TT(C)-3.
At the time of
the submittal of the plot
plan for Phase 3 of the
proposed project, the
applicant shall submit a
supplemental traffic study
assessing the projects
contribution to the impacts
at the Redlands Boulevard
intersection with SR-60
ramps, as well as Theodore
Street at SR-60. The
developer shall contribute
to the costs on a fair share
basis of the intersection
improvements required to
provide adequate capacity
for all phases of the
project and buildout of the
adjacent areas. If the
timing of Phase 3 of the
project precedes the planned
improvements, the project
shall be required to
construct interim
improvements to provide
adequate capacity until the
ultimate improvements are
completed.
|
Applicant, City of Moreno Valley | City of Moreno Valley, Public Works, Transportation Engineering Division, Riverside County Transportation Department |
Phase 3 Plot Plan
Review (or As Determined By MM TT-2) |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Utilities and Service Systems
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM W-l.
Prior to issuance
of a Precise Grading Permit,
Planting and Irrigation
Plans shall be submitted for
review and prior to the
issuance of a building
permit, approved by the
City. Such plans shall
contain the following
components:
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | Plan Check Review/Prior to Issuance of Building Permit | |||||||||||||||
The plans
shall incorporate water
conservation principles as
detailed in the Moreno Valley
|
100
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
Municipal Code § 9. 17.030 Landscape
and irrigation design standards.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Plant types shall be grouped together
according to their water, soil, sun and
shade requirements and in relationship to
the buildings. Plants with different water
needs shall be irrigated separately.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Plans shall be designed in accordance
with soil tests to determine appropriate
specifications of soil amendments and to
facilitate selection of water- efficient
plant species suitable for the site. Soil
amendments such as compost-shall be
provided to improve water-holding
capacity of soil, where soil conditions
warrant.
|
||||||||||||||||||
All exposed surfaces of
non-turf areas within the developed
landscape area shall be mulched with a
minimum three inch (3) layer of material,
except in areas with groundcover planted
from flats where mulch depth shall be
one and one half inches (1.5).
|
||||||||||||||||||
Turf areas shall be limited to public
gathering areas and used in
compliance with City approved water
budget formula(s) and specifications.
|
||||||||||||||||||
All irrigation systems shall be designed
to prevent runoff, over-spray, low
head drainage (occurs where sprinkler
systems are installed in sloped areas) and
other similar conditions where water
flows offsite on to adjacent property,
non-irrigated areas, walk, roadways, or
structures. Irrigation systems shall be
designed, constructed, managed, and
maintained to achieve as high an
overall efficiency as possible.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Landscaped areas shall be provided with
a) smart irrigation controllers which
automatically adjusts the frequency
and/or duration of irrigation events in
response to changing weather conditions; b)
rain- sensing devices to prevent
irrigation during rainy weather; c)
anti-drain check valves installed at
strategic points to minimize or prevent
low-head drainage; and d) pressure
regulators when the static water pressure
exceeds the maximum recommended
|
101
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||||
operating pressure of the irrigation
system.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
The
planting areas shall be grouped in relation to
moisture control zones based on similarity of
water requirements (i.e., turf separate from shrub
and groundcover, full sun exposure areas separate
from shade areas; top of slope separate from toe
of slope).
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Global Climate Change and
Greenhouse Gases
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-1.
The project shall be designed to meet
applicable 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency
requirements, or any more stringent requirements that
may be adopted prior to the issuance of building
permits for the project.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, Building and Safety Division | Plan Check Review/Prior to Issuance of Building Permits | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-2.
All buildings shall be designed with coo!
roofs using products certified by the Cool Roof
Rating Council, and exposed roof surfaces shall use
cool paints.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, Building and Safety Division | Plan Check Review/Prior to Issuance of Building Permits | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-3
. The project shall install a photovoltaic
array (solar panels) or other source of renewable
energy generation on-site, or otherwise acquire
energy from the local utility that has been generated
by renewable sources, to meet the projects Phase 1
office electricity needs.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, Building and Safety Division | Prior to Certificate of Occupancy/Phase 1 Office Occupancy | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-4
. The design and operation of the project
shall use ENERGY STAR-qualified energy efficient
products for heating and cooling systems, and for
built-in appliances and lighting.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division, Building and Safety Division | Plan Check Review/Prior to Issuance of Building Permits | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-5
. To reduce vehicle miles traveled and
emissions associated with trucks and vehicles, the
following measures shall be implemented to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director,
Public Works Director, Building Official and
Transportation Division Manager:
a) Onsite secure, weather-protected bicycle storage |
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division, Building and Safety Division, Public Works, Transportation Engineering Division | Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, Operation |
102
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
parking
shall be provided. Onsite
showers
(one for males and one for
females) and lockers for
employees shall be provided in each
building. Onsite convenient
bicycle parking shall be provided
for retail customers.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
b) Any traffic lights installed as
part
of this project shall use Light
Emitting Diodes.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
c) Pedestrian and bicycle connections
shall be provided to surrounding areas
consistent with the Existing General Plan.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
d) A Transportation Management
Association (TMA) shall be
established for the project by the
applicant. The TMA shall coordinate its
efforts with other TMAs in the
City and encourage and coordinate
carpooling by occupants of the project.
The TMA shall advertise its services
to the building occupants. The TMA
shall offer transit or other
incentives to the employees to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. A shuttle
shall be provided during any one
hour period where the number of
employees using public transit exceeds 20
during the period. The TMA shall
distribute public transportation
information to its employees. The
TMA shall provide electronic message board
space for coordinating rides.
Within two months after project
completion, the TMA shall submit a plan to
the City that outlines the measures the
TMA has implemented and contact
information.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
e) There shall be preferential
parking
for carpools; vanpools, and
alternatively fueled vehicles.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM
GCC-6.
The project shall provide a
minimum of two electric vehicle-charging
stations.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division and Building and Safety Division | Prior to Certificate of Occupancy |
103
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM GCC-7.
During onsite construction
phases of mass grading, fine grading,
and building (excluding asphalt paving,
trenching, and offsite improvements),
off-road construction equipment shall
use biodiesel fuel (a minimum of B20, or
20 percent of biodiesel). Construction
equipment exempt from this measure
include those with warranties that would
be yoided if B20 biodiesel fuel is used.
Prior to issuance of grading permits,
the applicant shall provide
documentation to the City that verifies
that certain equipment are exempt; that
a biodiesel supply has been secured; and
that the construction contractor is
aware that the use of biodiesel is
required.
|
Applicant,
Construction Supervisor |
City of Moreno Valley Public Works, Land Development Division |
Prior to Issuance
of Grading Permits
During Construction |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-8.
Prior to issuance of a grading
permit, the project shall have in place a
City-approved Solid Waste Diversion and
Recycling Plan that demonstrates the
diversion and recycling of all
salvageable and re-useable wood, metal,
plastic and paper products used during
project construction. A similar Plan
shall be in place prior to occupancy that
demonstrates the diversion and recycling
of all wood, metal, plastic and paper
products during on-going operation of the
warehouse and office portions of the
project. The Plans shall include the name
of the waste hauler, their assumed
destination for all waste and recycled
materials, and the procedures that will
be followed to ensure implementation of
this measure.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division and Public Works and Development Division |
Prior to Issuance
of Grading Permit
Prior to
Certificate of Occupancy |
104
City of Moreno Valley Highland Fairview Corporate Park | Mitigation Monitoring Program 12/23/2008 |
Verification of | Finish | Monitoring | ||||||||||||||
Mitigation Measure | Responsible Party | Compliance | Timing | Start Date | Date | Date | Monitor | |||||||||
MM GCC-9.
The project shall be
certifiable under Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design (LEED). The
project shall obtain the following
credits from the LEED for New
Construction & Major Renovations,
version 2.2 (or equivalent): Sustainable
Sites Credit 7.1: Heat Island Effect,
Non-Roof; LEED Energy & Atmosphere
Credit 1, Optimize Energy Performance,
in part through installing skylights and
utilizing energy efficient lighting.
Demonstration of certifiability shall be
provided to the satisfaction of the
City, prior to the issuance of building
permits.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division and Building and Safety Division | Submit Prior to Building Permits | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-10.
The project shall be designed
to accommodate trucks utilizing
SmartWay Truck Efficiency emission
reduction-features. Trailer tails
(extenders) are incompatible with
loading docks and are exempt from this
measure.
|
Applicant | City of Moreno Valley Planning Division | Prior to Issuance of Building Permits/Prior to Construction (Provide Documentation) | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
MM GCC-11.
Every truck that enters the
site with a gross vehicle weight rating
over 10,000 pounds shall have an Engine
Certification Label. If it does not have
the label, it shall be prohibited from
entering the project site.
|
Applicant, Tenant | City of Moreno Valley, Planning Division | Operation |
105
1
A. | This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth above in this Resolution are true and correct. | ||
B. | Based upon substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced meetings on February 3, 2009 and February 10, 2009, including written and oral staff reports, and the record from the public hearing, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: |
1. | Conformance with General Plan Policies The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan, and its goals, objectives, policies and programs. | ||
FACT: The applicant has proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 35629 to subdivide a 158-acre site into four (4) separate buildable parcels and two primary parcels dedicated for freeway improvement purposes (thirteen parcels overall to include lettered lots for public access and dedication purposes.) for industrial and commercial/retail development. The map would be consistent with a proposed General Pan amendment to eliminate a General Plan designated multi-use trail (Sinclair extension) through the center of the property. |
2
move and extend the proposed General Plan trail along future Eucalyptus Avenue (Fir Avenue) from the south side of the street to the north side of the street from Quincy Street to Theodore Street, modify the General Plan circulation plan to change the designation of future Eucalyptus Avenue (Fir), from an arterial to a divided arterial, and the adjustment of small portions of the land between proposed Parcels 2 and 3 (an enlargement of 93 feet in width in the CC land use district and decrease of the BP or Business Park land use designation) and Parcels 1 and 4 (a reduction of 126 feet in width of the CC land use district to BP or Business Park). The change in land use designation for these small portions of land will not cause an inconsistency of land use. | |||
2. | The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development. | ||
FACT: The proposed subdivision has been designed in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act. The proposed subdivision of-vacant land complies with the Specific Plan and Map Act in that all lots meet the minimum buildable size, all lots upon which development will take place will provide access to and from dedicated public streets and all lots conform to development standards within the Municipal Code. | |||
3. | Health, Safety and Welfare The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. | ||
FACT: An Environmental Impact report (EIR) has been prepared for the overall project, including the proposed Change of Zone and General Plan amendment. Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for said project to deal with impacts related to aesthetics, agriculture, air quality, and noise as well as climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Said EIR is required to be certified and approved as a part of the proposed project. Said EIR will also be accompanied by a Mitigation Monitoring Program, which will ensure the completion of required mitigation measures for the project. The project site is surrounded by Highway 60 to the north, and primarily vacant residential property to the south east and west. |
3
Specific mitigation measures have been Provided to lessen the impacts (but not all below significant levels) for public health, safety and the welfare of surrounding properties and improvements in the vicinity of the project. This includes, but is not limited to the limitation of project lighting and glare, and enhanced architectural and landscaping treatment to soften views and reduce visual character as well as light and glare to less than significant levels for aesthetics. Air quality mitigation measures include a fugitive dust control plan with application of best management practices to control fugitive dust during construction, emission control equipment with a minimum of Tier II diesel particulate filter emission controls resulting in a minimum reduction in 50 percent in particulate matter, proper maintenance of construction equipment, a traffic control plan to minimize operational truck traffic and dust during construction, as well as low VOC paints, and other best management practices. Noise mitigation measures include the restriction of construction vehicles on Redlands Boulevard, south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, the restriction of nighttime grading within 1,200 feet of residences south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, specific sound barriers in place to limit daytime construction noise, equipment maintenance to include silencers, mufflers and acoustic covers, and the restriction of material stockpiles within 1,200 feet of all residences south of Highway 60. It is also important to note that an approximate 440 foot land use buffer is included as a land use mitigation measure to buffer or minimize environmental impacts of the project from future sensitive receptors which could be Constructed south of the site. Other mitigation throughout the EIR document reduces the remaining environmental impacts noted in the document to less than significant levels. | |||
With the above mitigation measures imposed for items including noise, air quality, climate change/greenhouse gases, aesthetics and agricultural impacts, any environmental impacts from the proposed project and use will be significantly reduced but are still considered as significant and unavoidable, thereby requiring a statement of overriding considerations. Said mitigation measures included with the Project will lessen environmental impacts on any existing or future properties within the general vicinity of the proposed development and project and reduce impacts to public health, safety and welfare. |
4
4. | The design of the proposed land division or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. | ||
FACT: There are no conflicts with easements on the subject site. The City Engineer has appropriately placed conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 35629 regarding various project improvements. | |||
5. | The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat or cause serious health problems. | ||
FACT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the overall project, including the proposed Change of Zone and General Plan amendment. Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for said project to deal with impacts related to aesthetics, agriculture, air quality, noise as well as climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Said EIR is required to be certified and approved as a part of the proposed project. Said document will also be accompanied by a Mitigation Monitoring Program, which will ensure the completion of required mitigation measures for the project. The project site is surrounded by Highway 60 to the north, and primarily vacant residential property to the south east and west. | |||
With mitigation measures imposed for noise, air quality, climate, aesthetics and agricultural and traffic impacts, impacts from the proposed project and use will be significantly reduced but still considered as significant and unavoidable, thereby requiring a statement of overriding considerations and not mitigated to less than significant Levels. Said mitigation measures included with the project will lessen environmental impacts on any existing or future properties within the general vicinity of the proposed development and project and reduce impacts to public health, safety and welfare. | |||
6. | The effect of the proposed housing needs of the region were considered and balanced against the public service needs of the residents of Moreno Valley and available fiscal and environmental resources. |
5
FACT: The proposed map meets the intent of the General Plan if the proposed general plan amendment (PA08-0089) is approved. The map will provide for a variety of industrial and commercial/retail land uses, supporting the economic base of the City. Proximity to existing residential and commercial land use allows for contiguous development and infrastructure. The project does not exceed the planned density or the associated public service demand as envisioned by the Moreno Valley General Plan. The Project does not exceed a threshold, which would create potential significant impacts to fiscal resources. The project will supplement the Citys fiscal resources by paying applicable impact fees for public facilities. Additionally, future development within the four buildable parcels will pay Community Services District fees, property tax, sales tax, utility tax and other taxes and fees that will be used to provide landscape maintenance as well as police, fire and other public services. | |||
7. | The design of the land division provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision. | ||
FACT: The size, configuration and orientation of the lots in this land division allow solar access for passive heating and opportunities for placement of shade trees and other vegetation for Cooling. | |||
8. | The project conforms with any applicable provisions of the Citys redevelopment plan. | ||
FACT: The proposed project site is not located in a redevelopment area. |
C. | FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND OTHER EXACTIONS |
1. | FEES |
6
2. | DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND OTHER EXACTIONS |
3. | The City expressly reserves the right to establish, modify or adjust any fee, dedication, reservation or other exaction to the extent permitted and as authorized by law. |
7
/s/ Richard A. Stewart | ||
|
||
|
Mayor |
ATTEST:
|
||
/s/ [ILLEGIBLE] | ||
|
||
|
||
(SEAL)
|
||
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
|
||
/s/ Robert D. Herrick | ||
|
8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
) | |||||
|
||||||
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
|
) | ss. | ||||
|
||||||
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
|
) |
AYES: | Council Members Batey, Hastings, Molina, Mayor Pro Tem Flickinger and Mayor Stewart | |||||
|
||||||
|
NOES: | None | ||||
|
||||||
|
ABSENT: | None | ||||
|
||||||
|
ABSTAIN: | None | ||||
|
||||||
|
/s/ [ILLEGIBLE] | |||||
|
CITY CLERK | |||||
|
||||||
|
(SEAL) |
9
Approval
Date:
|
February 10, 2009 | |
Expiration Date:
|
February 10, 2112 |
þ | Planning (P), including School District (S), Post Office (PO), Building (B) | |
þ | Fire Prevention Bureau (F) | |
þ | Public Works, Land Development (LD) | |
þ | Public Works, Special Districts (SD) | |
þ | Public Works Transportation (TE) | |
þ | Parks & Community Services (PCS) | |
þ | Police (PD) | |
þ | Moreno Valley Utilities | |
o | Other (Specify or Delete) |
P1. | This approval shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code. (Advisory) |
10
P2.
|
This tentative map shall expire three years after the approval date of this tentative map unless extended as provided by the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever in the event the applicant or any successor in interest fails to properly file a final map before the date of expiration. (MC 9.02.230, 9.14.050, 080) (Advisory) | |
|
||
P3.
|
The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved tentative map on file in the Community Development Department -Planning Division, the Municipal Code regulations, General Plan, and the conditions contained herein. (MC 9.14.020) (Advisory) | |
|
||
P4.
|
A drought tolerant, low water using landscape palette shall be utilized throughout the site. | |
|
||
P5.
|
All undeveloped portions of the site shall be maintained in a manner that provides for the control of weeds, erosion and dust. (MC 9.02.030) (Advisory) | |
|
||
P6.
|
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash and debris. (MC 9.02.030) (Advisory) | |
|
||
P7.
|
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with this approval. (Advisory) | |
|
||
PRIOR TO GRADING | ||
|
||
P8.
|
(GP) Prior to approval of any grading permit, the developer shall submit a tree plan to the Planning Division for review and approval. The plan shall identify all mature trees (4 inch trunk diameter or larger) on the subject property and City right-of-way. Using the grading plan as a base, the plan shall indicate trees to be relocated, retained, and removed. Replacement trees shall be: shown on the landscape/irrigtion plan; be a minimum size of 24 inch box; and meet a ratio of three replacement trees for each mature tree removed or as approved by the Community Development Director or designee. (GP Objective 4.4, 4.5, DG) | |
|
||
P9.
|
(GP) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall pay the applicable Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR) Habitat Conservation Plan mitigation fee. (Ord) (Advisory) |
11
P10.
|
(GP) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, final erosion control landscape and irrigation plans for all cut or fill slopes over 3 feet in height shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval for the phase in process. The plans shall be designed in accordance with the slope erosion plan as required by the City Engineer for that phase. Man-made slopes greater than 10 feet in height shall be land formed to conform to the natural terrain and shall be landscaped and stabilized to minimize visual scarring. (GP Objective 1.5, MC 9.08.080, DG) (Advisory) | |
|
||
P11.
|
Prior to approval of a precise grading plan, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review. The plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Citys Municipal Code and landscape specifications, and include required street trees. (Advisory) | |
|
||
P12.
|
( (GP) If potential historic, archaeological, or paleontological resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at the project site, work in the affected area will cease immediately and a qualified person (meeting the Secretary of the Interiors standards (36CFR61)) shall be consulted by the applicant to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, prehistoric, or paleontological resource. Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all affected Native American Tribes before any further work commences in the affected area. (Advisory) | |
|
||
|
If human remains are discovered, work in the affected area shall cease immediately and the County Coroner shall be notified. If it is determined that the remains are potentially Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission and any and all affected Native American Indians tribes such as the Morongo Band of Mission Indians or the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be notified and appropriate measures provided by State law shall be implemented. (GP Objective 23.3, DG, CEOA). | |
|
||
P13.
|
(GP) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a pre-construction Burrowing Owl survey shall be completed with written documentation provided to the Planning Division. The survey shall be completed in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Area. |
12
P14.
|
(GP) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall submit final landscape and irrigation plans within the State Highway 60 right-of-way adjacent to the project site consistent with the State Highway 60 Corridor Design Manual. The plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. (MC 9.14.100) | |
|
||
P15.
|
A qualified archaeologist and or tribal monitors from any affected Native American Indian tribes shall be present during grading to evaluate and recommend appropriate actions for any archaeological deposits exposed by construction activity. The monitoring archaeologist shall be empowered to halt grading in the vicinity of an exposed archaeological deposit until that deposit can be fully evaluated. The consultant (i.e. archaeologist) shall consult with any and all affected Native American Indian tribes in the area on any Treatment Plan prepared for the project. | |
|
||
P16.
|
(GP) Prior to the issuance of precise grading permits, mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved with this project shall be implemented as provided therein. | |
|
||
P17.
|
(GP) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall submit wall/fence plans to the Planning Division for review and approval for all fences and walls required or proposed on site, included, but not limited to the 11 foot screening wall along the perimeter of the site including pilasters and caps, or alternative design as approved by the Community Development Director. (MC 9.08.070) | |
|
||
P18.
|
(GP) Prior to issuance of grading permits, landscape plans (trees, shrubs and groundcover) for basins maintained by an Property Owners Association (POA) or other private entity shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval for the sides and/or slopes. A hydroseed mix w/irrigation is acceptable for the bottom of all the basin areas. All detention basins shall include trees, shrubs and groundcover up to the concreted portion of the basin. A solid decorative wall with pilasters, tubular steel fence with pilasters or other fence or wall approved by the Community Development Director is required to secure all water quality and detention basins more than 18 inches in depth. |
13
14
15
F1.
|
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. | |
|
||
F2.
|
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B and Table B105.1. The applicant/developer shall provide documentation to show there exists a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM for 4 hour(s) duration at 20-PSI residual operating pressure. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Specific requirements for the project will be determined at time of building plan submittal. (CFC 508.3, Appendix B and MVMC 8.36.100 Section D). The 50% reduction in fire flow was granted for the use of fire sprinklers throughout the facility. The reduction shall only apply to fire flow, hydrant spacing shall be per the fire flow requirements listed in CFC Appendix B and C. | |
|
||
F3.
|
Industrial, Commercial, Multi-family, Apartment, Condominium, Townhouse or Mobile Home Parks . A combination of on-site and off-site super enhanced fire hydrants (6 x 4 x 4 x 2 ½ ) shall not be closer than 40 feet and more than 150 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved emergency vehicular travel ways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent fire hydrant(s) in the system. Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, super or enhanced fire hydrants as determined by the fire code official shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 500 feet of frontage for transportation hazards. (CFC 508.5.7 & MVMC 8.36.050 Section O and 8.36.100 Section E) |
16
LD1.
|
(G) The developer shall comply with all applicable City ordinances and resolutions including the Citys Municipal Code (MC) and if subdividing land, the Government Code (GC) of the State of California, specifically Sections 66410 through 66499.58, said sections also referred to as the Subdivision Map Act (SMA). (MC 9.14.010) (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD2.
|
(G) if the project involves the subdivision of land, maps may be developed in phases with the approval of the City Engineer. Financial security shall be provided for all improvements associated with each phase of the map. The boundaries of any multiple map increment shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The City Engineer may require the dedication and construction of necessary utilities, streets or other improvements outside the area of any particular map, if the improvements are needed for circulation, parking, access, or for the welfare or safety of the public. (MC 9.14.080, GC 66412 and 66462.5) If the project does not involve the subdivision of land and it is necessary to dedicate right-of-way/easements, the developer shall make the appropriate offer of dedication by separate instrument. The City Engineer may require the construction of necessary utilities, streets or other improvements beyond the project boundary, if the improvements are needed for circulation, parking, access, or for the welfare or safety of the public. (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD3.
|
(G) It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and that their omission may require the map or plans associated with this application to be resubmitted for further consideration. (MC 9.14.040) (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD4.
|
(G) In the event right-of-way or offsite easements are required to construct offsite improvements necessary for the orderly development of the surrounding |
17
area to meet the public health and safety needs, the developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the needed right-of-way in accordance with the Land Development Divisions administrative policy. In the event that the developer is unsuccessful, he shall enter into an agreement with the City to acquire the necessary right-of-way or offsite easements and complete the improvements at such time the City acquires the right-of-way or offsite easements which will permit the improvements to be made. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the right-of-way or easement acquisition per the Subdivision Map Act. (GC 66462.5) (Advisory) | ||||||
|
||||||
LD5. | (G) If improvements associated with this project are not initiated within two years of the date of approval of the Public Improvement Agreement, the City Engineer may require that the improvement cost estimate associated with the project be modified to reflect current City construction costs in effect at the time of request for an extension of time for the Public Improvement Agreement or issuance of a permit. (Advisory) | |||||
|
||||||
LD6. | (G) The developer shall monitor, supervise and control all construction and construction supportive activities, so as to prevent these activities from causing a public nuisance, including but not limited to, insuring strict adherence to the following: | |||||
|
||||||
|
a. | Removal of dirt, debris, or other construction material deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day. | ||||
|
||||||
|
b. | Observance of working hours as stipulated on permits issued by the Public Works Department. | ||||
|
||||||
|
c. | The construction site shall accommodate the parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the site. | ||||
|
||||||
|
d. | All dust control measures per South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements shall be adhered to during the grading operations. | ||||
|
||||||
Violation of any condition or restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions shall subject the owner, applicant, developer or contractor(s) to remedies as noted in the City Municipal Code 8.14.090. In addition, the City Engineer or Building Official may suspend all construction related activities for violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions until such time as it has been determined that all operations and activities are in conformance with these conditions. (Advisory) | ||||||
|
||||||
LD7. | (G) The developer shall protect downstream properties from damage caused by alteration of drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including, but not limited to, modifying existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. (MC 9.14.110) (Advisory) | |||||
|
||||||
LD8. | (G) Public drainage easements, when required, shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide and shall be shown on the map and plan, and noted as follows: Drainage |
18
19
20
requirements associated with the WQMP. A boilerplate copy of the Stormwater Treatment Device and Control Measure Access and Maintenance Covenant, can be obtained by contacting the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department. | ||||||||
(Advisory) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
LD17. | (GPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, or issuance of a building permit, if a grading permit is not required, the Developer shall secure approval of the final project-specific WQMP from the City Engineer. (Advisory) | |||||||
|
||||||||
LD18. | (GPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, or issuance of a building permit as determined by the City Engineer, the approved final project-specific WQMP shall be incorporated by reference or attached to the projects Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as the Post-Construction Management Plan. | |||||||
|
||||||||
LD19. | (GPA) Prior to grading permit issuance, the developer shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in conformance with the states Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit. A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request. The SWPPP shall be submitted to the Citys Storm Water Program Manager on compact disk(s) in Microsoft Word format. The developer is required to bring the SWPPP to the grading pre-construction meeting. (Advisory) | |||||||
|
||||||||
LD20. | (GPA) Prior to the approval of the grading plans, the developer shall pay any applicable remaining grading plan check fee. (Advisory) | |||||||
|
||||||||
LD21. | (GPA/MA) Prior to the later of either grading plan or final map approval, resolution of all drainage issues shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Advisory) | |||||||
|
||||||||
LD22. | (GP) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a letter of permission to grade for a specific duration recorded against each offsite parcel and an easement for slope purposes at final map recordation. (Advisory) | |||||||
|
||||||||
LD23. | (GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, if the fee has not already been paid prior to map approval or prior to issuance of a building permit if a grading permit is not required, the developer shall pay Area Drainage Plan (ADP) fees. The developer shall provide a receipt to the City showing that ADP fees have been paid to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. (MC 9.14.100) | |||||||
|
||||||||
LD24. | (GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the following securities shall be submitted to the City: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
a. | Security, in the form of a cash deposit (preferable), letter of credit, or performance bond shall be required to be submitted as a guarantee of the completion of the grading required as a condition of approval of the project (MC 8.21.070) |
21
b. | Erosion control security as a guarantee of the completion and maintenance of the erosion control systems required as a condition of approval of the project. The amount of the security shall be equal to one hundred (100) percent of the total estimated cost of the erosion control system(s). The permittees estimate of such cost shall be based on the established unit costs available form the city and shall be subject to the review and approval of the city engineer. At least twenty-five (25) percent of the required security shall be in cash and shall be deposited with the city engineer. The remainder of the erosion control security shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney, and consist of one or more of the following: |
i. | Cash deposit; | ||
ii. | Bond | ||
iii. | Certificate of Deposit | ||
iv. | Letter of Credit, in City format, from one or more local financial institution(s) subject to regulation by the state or federal government. (MC 8.21.150) |
(Advisory) |
LD25. | (GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall pay the applicable grading inspection fees. (Advisory) |
LD26. | (MA) Prior to approval of the final map, the developer shall submit a copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to the Land Development Division for review and approval. The CC&Rs shall include, but not be limited to, access easements, reciprocal access, private and/or public utility easements as may be relevant to the project. (Advisory) | |
LD27. | (MA) Prior to approval of the final map, all street dedications shall be irrevocably offered to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. All dedications shall be free of all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. (Advisory) | |
LD28. | (MA) Prior to approval of the final map, security shall be required to be submitted as a guarantee of the completion of the improvements required as a condition of approval of the project. A Public Improvement Agreement (PIA) will be required to be executed. (Advisory) | |
LD29. | (MR) Prior to recordation of the final map, this project is subject to requirements under the current permit for storm water activities required as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) as mandated by the Federal Clean Water Act. In compliance with Proposition 218, the developer shall agree to approve the City of Moreno Valley NPDES Regulatory |
22
Rate Schedule that is in place at the time of recordation. Following are the requirements: |
a. | Select one of the following options to meet the financial responsibility to provide storm water utilities services for the required operation and maintenance monitoring and system evaluations in accordance with Resolution No. 2002-46. |
i. | Participate in the mail ballot proceeding in compliance with Proposition 218, for the Common Interest, Commercial, Industrial and Quasi-Public Use NPDES Regulatory Rate Schedule and pay all associated costs with the ballot process; or | ||
ii. | Establish an endowment to cover future City costs as specified in the Common Interest, Commercial, Industrial and Quasi-Public Use NPDES Regulatory Rate Schedule. |
b. | Notify the Special Districts Division of the intent to record the final map prior to City Council action authorizing recordation of the final map and the financial option selected. (California Government Code & Municipal Code) |
(Advisory) |
LD30. | (MR) Prior to recordation of the map, the developer shall submit the map, on compact disks, in (.dxf) digital format to the Land Development Division of the Public works Department. (Advisory) |
LD31. | (IPA) Improvement plans shall be drawn on twenty-four (24) inch by thirty-six (36) inch mylar and signed by a registered civil engineer and other registered/licensed professional as required. (Advisory) | |
LD32. | (IPA) Prior to approval of the improvement plans, the developer shall submit clearances from all applicable agencies, and pay all outstanding plan check fees. (MC 9.14.210) (Advisory) | |
LD33. | (IPA) All public improvement plans prepared and signed by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City standards, policies and requirements shall be approved by the City Engineer. Securities and a public improvement agreement shall be required to be submitted and executed as a guarantee of the completion of the improvements. (Advisory) | |
LD34. | (IPA) The street improvement plans shall comply with all applicable City standards and the following design standards throughout this project: |
a. | Corner cutbacks in conformance with City Standard 208 shall be shown on the final map or, if no map is to be recorded, offered for dedication by separate instrument. |
23
b. | Lot access to major thoroughfares shall be restricted except at intersections and approved entrances and shall be so noted on the final map. (MC 9.14.100) | ||
c. | The minimum centerline and flow line grades shall be one percent unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (MC 9.14.020) | ||
d. | All street intersections shall be at ninety (90) degrees plus or minus five (5) degrees or as approved by the City Engineer per City Standard No. 706A. (MC 9.14.020) | ||
e. | All reverse curves shall include a minimum tangent of one hundred (100) feet in length. |
(Advisory) |
LD35. | (IPA) Improvement plans, including design plan and profile information, shall be based upon a centerline profile, extending beyond the project boundaries approved by the City Engineer. Design plan and profile information shall include the minimum 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. (Advisory) | |
LD36. | (IPA) Improvement plans, shall reflect the Citys moratorium on trench repair pavement cuts on any streets less than three years old or on slurry sealed streets less than one year old unless specifically approved by the City Engineer. Pavement cuts for trench repairs may be allowed for emergency repairs or as specifically approved by the City Engineer. (Advisory) | |
LD37. | (IPA) Drainage facilities with sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary 100-year storm flows. Secondary emergency escape shall also be provided. (MC 9.14.110) (Advisory) | |
LD38. | (IPA) If the projects hydrology study proposes to use any portion of a public street right-of-way to accommodate storm flows, said study shall show that the 10-year storm flow will be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm flow will be contained within the street right-of-way. On major streets (Minor Arterial or larger), at least one lane in each direction shall remain open and not be used to carry surface flows. When any of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities shall be installed as approved by the Public Works Department Land Development Division. (MC 9.14.110) (Advisory) | |
LD39. | (IPA) The project shall be designed to accept and properly convey all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. All storm drain design and improvements shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. (Advisory) | |
LD40. | (CP) All work performed within the City right-of-way requires a construction permit. As determined by the City Engineer, security may be required for work within the right-of-way. Security shall be in the form of a cash deposit or other approved means. The City Engineer may require the execution of a public improvement agreement as a condition of the issuance of the construction |
24
permit. All inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of construction permit. (MC 9.14.100) (Advisory) | ||
LD41. | (CP) Prior to issuance of a construction permit, all public improvement plans prepared and signed by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City standards, policies and requirements shall be approved by the City Engineer. (Advisory) | |
LD42. | (CP) Prior to issuance of construction permits, the developer shall submit all improvement plans on compact disks, in (.dxf) digital format to the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department. (Advisory) | |
LD43. | (CP) Prior to issuance of construction permits, the developer shall pay all applicable inspection fees. (Advisory) |
LD44. | (BP) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit for review and approval, a Waste Management Plan (WMP) per City code and Land Development Division requirements. (AB939, MC 8.80) (Advisory) |
LD45. | (CO) Prior to issuance of the last certificate of occupancy or building final, the developer shall pay all outstanding fees. (Advisory) | |
LD46. | (CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final, the developer shall construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following applicable improvements: |
a. | Street improvements including, but not limited to: pavement, base, curb and/or gutter, cross gutters, spandrel, sidewalks, drive approaches, pedestrian ramps, street lights, signing, striping, under sidewalk drains, landscaping and irrigation, medians, redwood header boards, pavement tapers/transitions and traffic control devices as appropriate. | ||
b. | Storm drain facilities including, but not limited to: storm drain pipe, storm drain laterals, open channels, catch basins and local depressions. | ||
c. | City-owned utilities. | ||
d. | Sewer and water systems including, but not limited to: sanitary sewer, potable water and recycled water. | ||
e. | Under grounding of existing and proposed utility lines less than 115,000 volts. |
25
f. | Relocation of overhead electrical utility lines including, but not limited to: electrical, cable and telephone. |
(Advisory) |
LD47. | (CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final, all existing and new utilities adjacent to and on-site shall be placed underground in accordance with City of Moreno Valley ordinances. (MC 9.14.130) (Advisory) |
LD48. | (CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final, the Developer must comply with the following: |
a. | Any required water quality basins, associated treatment control BMPs, and associated hardware per the approved civil drawing must be constructed, certified and approved by the City Engineer including, but not limited to, piping, forebay, aftbay, trash rack. | ||
b. | An Engineers Line and Grade Certification shall be provided to the City. | ||
c. | Said facilities shall pass a flow test per City test procedures. |
(Advisory) |
LD49. | (CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final for any Commercial/Industrial facility, whichever occurs first, the owner may have to secure coverage under the States General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit as issued by the State Water Resources Control Board. (Advisory) |
LD50. | (AOS) Aggregate slurry, per Section 203-5 of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, may be required just prior to acceptance of street(s) into the City maintained road system at the discretion of the City Engineer. (Advisory) |
LD51. | (RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, the developer shall obtain written concurrence from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) for any proposed modifications to the Moreno Area Drainage Plan as well as for the acceptance of a small new additional tributary area resulting from the projects proposed grading. |
LD52. | (RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, it shall be clearly demonstrated on the final drainage study that the potential increased rate of runoff resulting from the development of this site is mitigated. During identified storm events peak flow rates and velocity leaving the site in the |
26
developed condition shall be no larger than that of the pre-developed condition. The following shall be analyzed in the final drainage study: 1, 3, 6 and 24-hour storm duration for the 2, 5, 10 and 100-year storm events. The applicant understands that additional detention measures or other mitigation, beyond those shown on the tentative parcel map and preliminary drainage study, may be required and shall include those into the design and construction of appropriate drainage facilities. | ||
LD53. | (RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, emergency overflow areas shall be shown at all applicable drainage improvement locations in the event that the drainage improvement fails or exceeds full capacity. Emergency overflow area elevations shall be a minimum of 1 below the proposed building pad elevation in close proximity. This may include, but not be limited to, an emergency spillway in the basin and an emergency overflow at any sump catch basin location. The developer is responsible for securing any necessary on-site or off-site drainage easements as required for emergency overflow. | |
LD54. | (RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, all easements, existing, proposed, temporary, and those to be quitclaimed shall be shown on the plan complete with type of easement, easement width, as applicable, instrument number and date of recordation. Copies of the existing easement documents shall be submitted to the City (upon request) for review and approval. Those easements to be quitclaimed shall be coordinated with the appropriate easement holder, including but not limited to, those associated with the electrical utility lines traversing Parcel 1 and the water line running along the entire maps north boundary adjacent to SR-60 and its on-/off-ramps, as shown and labeled on the tentative parcel map. The above referenced water line shall be relocated outside the existing and ultimate SR-60 right-of-way and preferably within Eucalyptus Avenue. | |
LD55. | (RGPA) Not withstanding what is shown on the tentative parcel map and grading plan, no grading on Caltrans property shall be permitted without an encroachment permit. | |
LD56. | (RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, the plan shall show a minimum 15-foot wide maintenance access road from a public street to Parcels G, 5, and 6 (Parcels 5 and 6 to be designated as lettered parcels on the final parcel map) to provide maintenance access to these parcels until such time that the City accepts the dedication. Surrounding grading shall not prohibit runoff from leaving these parcels. | |
LD57. | (PGPA) Prior to precise grading plan approval, the precise grading plan shall be consistent with the rough grading plan and approved plot plan, in terms of, but not limited to, pad and grade elevations, proposed water quality treatment control best management practices and locations including detention and infiltration basins, proposed building, parking lot, landscape area, slope, and project entrance locations. (Advisory) |
27
LD58. | (PGPA) Prior to precise grading plan or improvement plan approval, as applicable, the plans shall show any driveway approach up to 40 in width to be constructed per City Standard Plan 118C, Option 2, modified. The driveways shall have a minimum radius of 50 if the entrance is to accommodate truck traffic, 35 otherwise, and transition from an 8 curb height to a 0 curb height at the conventional right-of-way 12 behind the curb line, or as approved by the City Engineer. There shall be a 4-foot wide pedestrian sidewalk area at 2% maximum cross slope behind the conventional right-of-way. A 4-foot pedestrian right-of-way dedication shall be made on PM 35629. Any entrance greater than 40 in width shall be designed as a street intersection. (Advisory) | |
LD59. | (IPA) If it is necessary to adjust the boundary of Parcel G, 5, and 6 (Parcels 5 and 6 to be designated as lettered parcels on the final parcel map) resulting in the need for additional right-of-way for highway and road purposes, it shall be dedicated to the City at no cost to the City. If it is necessary to adjust the boundary resulting in excess right-of-way not needed for highway and road purposes, the City and the developer shall pursue the appropriate mechanism to transfer or convey public property back to the developer. | |
LD60. | (IPA) Prior to improvement plan approval, the plans shall show redwood headers, or other pavement edge treatment as approved by the City Engineer, at all edge-of-pavement locations in the public right-of-way. If redwood header board is approved, the redwood header shall be installed per the City Standard, using a nominal minimum of 2 wide by 6 deep board. This shall include, but not be limited to, the following locations: |
a. | Along the frontage of Parcels 1, 2 and 4 of PM 35629, south side of Eucalyptus Avenue, south edge of the east bound travel lane to be constructed in Phase 1. | ||
b. | Along the frontage of Parcel 4 of PM 35629, east side of Theodore Street, east edge of the northbound travel lane to be constructed in Phase 2. | ||
c. | Along the frontage of Parcel 3 of PM 35629, west side of Redlands Boulevard, west edge of the southbound travel lane to be constructed in Phase 3. | ||
d. | Along the frontage of Parcel 3 of PM 35629, south side of Eucalyptus Avenue, south edge of the eastbound travel lane to be constructed in Phase 3. | ||
e. | At proposed pavement transitions at edge of pavement. | ||
f. | As required by the City Public Works Inspector(s). |
LD61. | (IPA) Storm drain improvement plans shall show the connection of the proposed private storm drain system to the proposed public storm drain |
28
system at the public street right-of-way. A storm drain manhole shall be placed at the right-of-way to mark the beginning of the publicly maintained portion of this storm drain. | ||
LD62. | (IPA) Prior to commencing any work within Caltrans right-of-way, the developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans. Work within Caltrans right-of-way may include that work associated with storm drain connections to existing freeway culverts, water line removal, water line extension from north of the freeway including jack and bore operation, power pole relocation and/or undergrounding, and any grading. | |
LD63. | (IPA) Prior to approval of improvement plans, the developer shall secure any off-site easements from the off-site property owner(s). This includes but is not limited to the drainage easement for the proposed spreading basin south of the project, the slope easement along the south side of Eucalyptus Avenue, the drainage easement for the culvert outlet across Eucalyptus Avenue near Theodore Street, the utility easement for the temporary overhead electrical lines, and any others that may be necessary for the construction and maintenance of offsite utility and infrastructure improvements. | |
LD64. | (IPA) Prior to approval of improvement plans for any master drainage plan facilities, a right-of-entry agreement shall be executed with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) for said facilities. | |
LD65. | (MA) Prior to parcel map approval, the map shall show a varying width lettered parcel along the projects north boundary and adjacent to SR-60, shown as Parcel G on the tentative parcel map, to be irrevocably offered for dedication to the City for highway and road purposes. Until such time the City accepts the irrevocable offer of dedication for the lettered parcel, the developer shall keep the parcel clear of permanent and/or temporary improvements, features, and obstructions, including but not limited to, those resulting from grading or water quality treatment. Minimal level of landscaping sufficient to achieve adequate erosion and sediment control consisting of native plants or other plant material as approved by the Planning Division shall be planted and maintained by the developer. Existing utilities shall be relocated outside of the dedicated parcel as conditioned hereon. New utilities shall not be placed within the dedicated parcel without City Engineer approval except for extension of existing storm drain culverts and proposed water line from north of the SR-60 in the Sinclair Street alignment. If permanent or temporary improvements, features, plant material, hardscape, or obstructions are placed within the dedicated parcel, without prior City approval, the developer shall pay any and all costs associated with the removal and restoration to conform to the approved grading plans. | |
LD66. | (MA) Prior to parcel map approval, the map shall show an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City for highway and road purposes, identified as Parcel 5 and Parcel 6 on the tentative parcel map (Parcels 5 and 6 to be |
29
shown as lettered parcels on the final parcel map) for an eastbound on-ramp at the Redlands Boulevard interchange and an eastbound off-ramp at the Theodore Street interchange, respectively. The map shall reflect Parcels 5 and 6 as lettered parcels prior to map approval. Until such time the City accepts the irrevocable offer of dedication for the lettered parcel, the parcel shall be kept clear of permanent and temporary improvements, features, and obstructions, including but not limited to, those resulting from grading or water quality treatment, other than those needed to conform to the grades and improvements shown on the approved tentative parcel map. Minimal level of landscaping sufficient to achieve adequate erosion and sediment control consisting of native plants or other plant material as approved by the Planning Division shall be planted and maintained by the developer as conditioned hereon. Existing utilities shall be relocated outside of the dedicated parcel. New utilities shall not be placed within the dedicated parcel without prior City Engineer approval. If permanent or temporary improvements, features, plant material, hardscape, or obstructions are placed within the dedicated parcel, the developer shall pay any and all costs associated with the removal and restoration to conform to the approved grading plan. | ||
LD67. | (MA) Prior to parcel map approval, if the developer proposes to grade the site such that a slope is created for future freeway on- and/or off-ramp improvements within Parcels G, 5 and/or 6 (Parcels 5 and 6 to be shown as lettered parcels on the final parcel map), the developer shall obtain City approval such that the slope will coordinate closely with the future ramp improvements. It may be required that the developer grant a construction easement to the City, ultimately to Caltrans, at no cost to the City or Caltrans, in the future to facilitate the interchange improvements in order to make any necessary adjustments to the slope, drainage, and related features located within and/or outside of Parcels G, 5 and/or 6. In no event shall the exercise of this easement disrupt any existing development or damage any site improvements. | |
LD68. | (MA) Prior to parcel map approval, the map shall show the appropriate right-of-way to be dedicated as well as all existing and proposed easements. |
a. | The map shall show a right-of-way dedication on Eucalyptus Avenue to secure a full width right-of-way distance of 110 for a Divided Arterial, City Standard 103A, modified to accommodate enhanced 12-foot wide landscape areas within the street parkway. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated at the intersection of Eucalyptus Avenue and Redlands Boulevard to accommodate southbound dual left turn lanes and a dedicated northbound right-turn lane as well as at the intersection of Eucalyptus Avenue and Theodore Street to accommodate dual left turn lanes. | ||
b. | The map shall show a minimum 20-foot wide multi-use trail and pedestrian access easement along the north side of Eucalyptus Avenue directly behind and adjacent to the proposed right-of-way. |
30
c. | The map shall show 37-foot wide open space parcels, Parcels A through E as shown on the tentative parcel map, along the north side of Eucalyptus Avenue directly behind and adjacent to the proposed right-of-way. The proposed multi-use trail and pedestrian access easement is to be located within the 37-foot wide open space parcels. The City will not maintain landscaping located within said 37-foot wide open space parcels. | ||
d. | The map shall show an additional 10-foot street right-of-way dedication on the east side of Redlands Boulevard along the map west boundary to secure a centerline to east right-of-way distance of 70 feet for a Divided Arterial, City Standard 103A, modified to accommodate curb-separated sidewalk as well as additional lanes required at the Eucalyptus Avenue intersection. | ||
e. | The map shall show an 18-foot wide bike trail and pedestrian access easement directly behind and adjacent to the proposed Redlands Boulevard east right-of-way. | ||
f. | The map shall show an additional 31-foot street right-of-way dedication on the west side of Theodore Street along the map east boundary to secure a centerline to west right-of-way distance of 61 feet for a Minor Arterial, City Standard 105A, modified to accommodate curb-separated sidewalk as well as additional lanes required at the Eucalyptus Avenue intersection. | ||
g. | The map shall show a minimum 18-foot wide bike trail and pedestrian access easement directly behind and adjacent to the proposed Theodore Street west right-of-way. | ||
h. | The map shall show a varying width lettered parcel, shown as Parcel G on the tentative parcel map, for highway and road purposes. | ||
i. | The map shall show a 4-foot pedestrian right-of-way dedication behind the driveway approach at any project entrance with a width up to 40 feet to be constructed per City Standard 118C. | ||
j. | The map shall show additional right-of-way at intersections to accommodate additional turning movements required by the Transportation Division, in conformance with the final traffic report. | ||
k. | The map shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, adequate right-of-way is being dedicated at the eastbound off-ramp at Theodore Street and the eastbound on-ramp at Redlands Boulevard to cover its ultimate alignment, consistent with the final traffic report and Caltrans standards. | ||
I. | The map shall show additional right-of-way at corner cutbacks per City Standard 208. |
31
LD69. | (MA) Prior to parcel map approval, a reciprocal access agreement between adjacent development parcels shall be submitted to the City for review and approval processing for concurrent recording with the final parcel map. Alternatively, the reciprocal access among parcels can be established in the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCRs) if any, and recorded concurrent with the map. | |
LD70. | (MA) Prior to parcel map approval, the Developer shall guarantee the construction of all improvements for all phases of development by entering into a public improvement agreement and posting security. The improvements required during each phase of development are described under that phase heading. The developer is required to complete those improvements listed under each phase by the occupancy of the first building of each phase, or as otherwise determined by the City Engineer. The improvements for Phase 1 are described below and shall be completed prior to occupancy of the building for Phase 1, or as otherwise determined by the City Engineer. |
a. | Eucalyptus Avenue, Divided Arterial, City Standard 103A (110 RW / 86 CC) modified to accommodate enhanced 12-foot wide landscape areas within the street parkway. The full 110-foot right-of-way dedication shall occur as part of Phase 1. The following shall be constructed with the development of Phase 1. |
i. | Street improvements to half-width, including the full-width median, plus an additional 18 feet south of the street median curb from the proposed interim cul-de-sac to Theodore Street. Improvements shall consist of, but not be limited to, pavement, base, redwood header, raised landscape median, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, drainage structures, any necessary offsite improvement transition/joins to existing, streetlights, pedestrian ramps, removal/relocation and/or undergrounding of any power poles with overhead utility lines less than 115,000 volts, and dry and wet utilities, including sewer and water main line construction, reclaimed water line construction, and electrical utility lines. | ||
ii. | A minimum 24-foot wide emergency access, paved to City Standard 108E, or better, from Redlands Boulevard to just west of the west property line of Parcel 2 of PM 35629. The emergency access road shall be constructed on the north side of Eucalyptus Avenue with a cross fall to one side at 2%. | ||
iii. | An interim cul-de-sac, if needed, to allow for truck turn-around movements located just west of the west property line of Parcel 2 of PM 35629. Full 86-foot curb-to-curb paved |
32
width in lieu of a cul-de-sac may suffice, as approved by the City Engineer. | |||
iv. | Intersection improvements at Eucalyptus Avenue and Theodore Street to allow for truck turning movements required in the Traffic Study for Phase 1 of the project. | ||
v. | Relocation of an existing water line that runs along the north map boundary adjacent to the SR-60 existing right-of-way to within Eucalyptus Avenue. | ||
vi. | A 6-foot wide curb-separated sidewalk to be located directly behind the 12-foot wide parkway landscape area adjacent to and outside of the street right-of-way. | ||
vii. | A 4-foot wide landscape area adjacent to and behind the curb-separated sidewalk. | ||
viii. | A 10-foot wide multi-use trail adjacent to and behind the 4-foot wide landscape area mentioned above. | ||
ix. | A 17-foot wide landscape area adjacent to and behind the 10-foot trail. All improvements and landscaping beyond the street right-of-way shall be located within a 37-foot wide open space area designated as lettered Parcels A through E, as shown on the tentative parcel map, along the north side of Eucalyptus Avenue. The 6-foot wide sidewalk, the 10-foot trail, and the 4-foot landscape area between the sidewalk and trail, shall be within a proposed minimum 20-foot wide multi-use trail and pedestrian access easement. The easement may be dedicated over the entire open space parcel width (37 feet) of Parcels A through E, as approved by the City Engineer. The City will not maintain landscaping located within said 37-foot wide open space parcels. |
b. | Theodore Street, Minor Arterial, City Standard 105A (131 RW /107 CC Modified) to accommodate additional lanes required for vehicular turning movements per the projects approved Traffic Study. An additional 31-foot right-of-way dedication on the west side of the street, along the maps east property line, shall be shown on the parcel map. Phase 1 limits of improvements consist of the following improvements: |
i. | Intersection improvements at Eucalyptus Avenue to allow for truck turning movements required in the projects approved Traffic Study for Phase 1 of the project. | ||
ii. | 30-foot wide paved access which meets current City standards or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer, from Eucalyptus Avenue to the SR-60 overpass. |
33
Improvements shall consist of, but not be limited to, pavement, base, asphalt concrete berm, any necessary offsite improvement transition/joins to existing. |
c. | Additional pavement for Theodore Street interchange on-and off- ramps as may be required to accommodate truck traffic turning movements in accordance with the Final Traffic Report and Transportation Division approval. | ||
d. | Project entrances up to 40-foot wide shall be constructed per City Standard No. 118C. The parcel map shall show an additional 4-foot right-of-way dedication behind driveway approaches. No decorative pavers shall be placed within the public right-of-way. Any entrance greater than 40 feet in width shall be designed as a street intersection. | ||
e. | Restoration of pavement per City trench standards resulting from bringing water line and sewer service lines to the project. | ||
f. | Pavement core samples of existing pavement on Theodore Street may be taken and findings submitted to the City for review and consideration of using an existing structural section of a lesser thickness of pavement improvements. The City will determine the adequacy of the existing pavement structural section. If the existing pavement section is found to be adequate, then a lesser thickness than that specified above for street pavement improvements may be allowed, as approved by the City Engineer. If the existing pavement section is found to be inadequate, the Developer shall construct the streets to the limits as listed above. |
LD71. | (BP) The developer shall coordinate with Land Development staff to facilitate partial pad certification in conjunction with construction sequencing as approved by the City Engineer. | |
LD72. | (BP) Prior to issuance of a building permit, final line and grade certification shall be provided by the licensed engineer of record stating the building pad is in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. For Parcel 1, the developer shall coordinate with Land Development staff to facilitate partial pad certification in conjunction with construction sequencing as approved by the City Engineer. The relocation and/or abandonment of existing utilities and quitclaim of existing easements shall be coordinated with the sequencing of the Parcel 1 development such that these do not interfere or encumber the particular building area being developed at any given time. | |
LD73. | (BP) Prior to building permit issuance this project shall cause the quitclaim of all existing easements, especially those easements underneath proposed building footprints shall be quitclaimed. This shall include, but not be limited to, the water line easement and power line easement. All utilities shall be relocated, as necessary, prior to |
34
quitclaiming the easements. All new easements shall be granted prior to utility relocations and quitclaims of existing easements. | ||
LD74. | (BP) Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall remove, or cause the removal, of any sign or other structure, as applicable, on the project site, including that portion within Parcels G, 5 and 6, as shown on the tentative parcel map (Parcels 5 and 6 to be dedicated as lettered parcels on the final parcel map), to be dedicated to the City for the future freeway expansion, unless other arrangements are made with and approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall record easements for, provide access to, etc. any sign or structure that might remain, as approved by the City Engineer. | |
LD75. | (BP) Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall submit to the City a recorded agreement pertaining to the maintenance of and access to the temporary spreading basin to be constructed on the land south and adjacent to this project map, identified as APN# 488-350-002. | |
LD76. | (BP) Prior to building permit issuance of the proposed building in Phase 1, the developer shall submit to the City for review and approval all required off-site (outside of the map boundary) easements, including but not limited to, a roadway slope easement along the south side of Eucalyptus Avenue, drainage easements at low points along the south side of Eucalyptus Avenue where rip rap and other drainage improvements are proposed, a drainage easement for the culvert headwall, rip rap and grading on the south side of Eucalyptus Avenue, just west of Theodore Street, an easement for any work outside of the Sinclair Street right-of-way north of SR-60 for work associated with the construction of the water line. These easements shall record prior to occupancy, after the City has reviewed and approved them prior to building permit issuance. | |
LD77. | (CO) Prior to occupancy for the proposed building in Phase 1, the developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans and complete the following jack and bore operation for the installation of a proposed water line underneath SR-60 to be located within Sinclair Street right-of-way north of the freeway. The developer shall apply Caltrans crossing requirements to the portion of the water line that will lie within Parcel G of the tentative parcel map. | |
LD78. | (CO) Prior to occupancy of the proposed building in Phase 1, the parcel map shall record along with all the offers of dedication for right-of-way and easements made on the map. | |
LD79. | (CO) Prior to occupancy of the proposed building in Phase 1, all overhead utility lines less than 115,000 volts fronting or within the entire map boundary shall be placed underground per Section 9.14.030C of the City Municipal Code except those along the west side of Theodore Street, the terminus of the facility over SR-60 at Sinclair Street, and the interim |
35
service from Redlands Boulevard and Dracaea Avenue northerly to the project site. | ||
LD80. | (CO) Prior to occupancy of the proposed building in Phase 1, existing utilities shall be relocated outside of Parcels G, 5, and 6, as identified on the tentative parcel map (Parcels 5 and 6 to be dedicated as lettered lots on the final parcel map), being offered for dedication for highway and road purposes. | |
LD81. | (CO) Prior to occupancy of the proposed building in Phase 1, the developer shall bring overhead electrical service to the building from the nearest source identified by the developer to be located on the west side of Redlands Boulevard near Dracaea Avenue. This will require the developer to bore under Redlands Boulevard to the east side of Redlands Boulevard. | |
LD82. | (CO) Prior to occupancy of any buildings, a cooperative (tri-party) agreement among the developer, the City and RCFC&WCD regarding the operation and maintenance of said facilities shall be executed. | |
LD83. | (RGPA) In accordance with the City of Moreno Valley standards, the Double Ring Infiltrometer field testing method per ASTM D3385 shall be utilized to perform in-situ percolation testing in the location of proposed infiltration area treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP) and the results included as an amendment to the Final WQMP prior to issuance of the first occupancy. (Advisory) | |
LD84. | (RGPA) The Applicant shall prepare and submit for approval a Project Specific Final Water Quality Management Plan (F-WQMP) for PA07-0090 - Highlands - Parcel 1 of TPM 35629 Logistics Building. The F-WQMP shall be consistent with the approved P-WQMP and in full conformance with the document; Riverside County Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff dated July 24, 2006. The F-WQMP shall be submitted and approved prior to rough grading plan approval. At a minimum, the F-WQMP shall include the following: Site Design BMPs; Source Control BMPs; Treatment Control BMPs; Operation and Maintenance requirements for BMPs; and sources of funding for BMP implementation. (Advisory) | |
LD85. | (RGPA) The Applicant shall select and implement treatment control BMPs that are medium to highly effective for treating Pollutants of Concern (POC) for the project. POC include project pollutants associated with a 303(d) listing or a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for receiving waters. Project pollutants of concern include: sediment/turbidity, nutrients, organic compounds, oxygen demanding substances, and pathogens. Exhibit C of the document, Riverside County Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff dated July 24, 2006 shall be consulted for determining the effectiveness of proposed treatment BMPs. (Advisory) |
36
LD86. | (RGPA) Overall, the proposed treatment control concept is accepted as the conceptual treatment control BMP for the proposed site. The Applicant has proposed to incorporate the use of combined detention and infiltration basins with underdrain systems. Final design details of these detention and infiltration systems must be provided in the first submittal of the F-WQMP. The size of the treatment control BMP is to be determined using the procedures set forth in Exhibit C of the Riverside County Guidance Document. The Applicant acknowledges that more area than currently shown on the plans may be required to treat site runoff as required by the WQMP Guidance Document. (Advisory) | |
LD87. | (RGPA) The Applicant shall substantiate the applicable Hydrologic Condition of Concern (HCOC) (WQMP Section IV) in the F-WQMP. The HCOC designates that the project will comply with Condition C; therefore, the condition must be addressed in the F-WQMP. | |
LD88. | (GP) The Applicant shall, prior to building or grading permit closeout or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, demonstrate: |
a. | That all structural BMPs have been constructed and installed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications; | ||
b. | That all structural BMPs described in the F-WQMP have been implemented in accordance with approved plans and specifications; | ||
c. | That the Applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs included in the F-WQMP, conditions of approval, and building/grading permit conditions; and | ||
d. | That an adequate number of copies of the approved F-WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants of the project. |
(Advisory) |
LD89. | (PPA) Prior to approval of a plot plan for any project on Parcel 4 of PM 35629, proposed pad and site elevations shall be coordinated with the most current design available for the Theodore Street interchange improvement plans. The plot plan shall show the proposed relocation corridor within the future right-of-way of Theodore Street for the overhead electrical power poles along Theodore Street for overhead utility lines larger than 115,000 volts. | |
LD90. | (CO) Theodore Street improvements shall be coordinated with the Citys Capital Project Theodore/SR60 Interchange Project. Interim improvements shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer and shall be constructed prior to the occupancy of any building in Phase 2. The |
37
project design shall accommodate the future ultimate improvements on Theodore Street which include half-width plus an additional 30 feet east of the centerline, along Parcel 4 of PM 35629 east frontage. Future ultimate improvements shall consist of, but not be limited to, pavement, base, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, drainage structures, any necessary offsite improvement transition/joins to existing, streetlights, pedestrian ramps, dry and wet utilities. In addition, the following improvements shall be provided within the 20-foot wide open space Parcel F shown on the tentative parcel map: a 2-foot wide portion of sidewalk located outside of the proposed sidewalk, a 4-foot wide landscaped area behind sidewalk, a 10-foot wide bike trail behind the 4-foot wide landscaped area, and a 2-foot wide flat landscape area. Ultimate improvements shall be coordinated with the Citys Capital Project Theodore Street/SR-60 Interchange Project and/or interim improvements shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer. | ||
LD91. | (CO) Prior to occupancy of any building in Phase 2, ultimate street improvements shall be constructed on Eucalyptus Avenue along project frontage, connecting to those improvements constructed in Phase 1. Improvements shall consist of, but not be limited to, pavement, base, raised landscape median, trail, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, drainage structures, any necessary offsite improvement transition/joins to existing, streetlights, pedestrian ramps, dry and wet utilities. In addition, the following improvements shall be constructed within a minimum 20-foot wide multi-use trail and pedestrian access easement: a 6-foot wide sidewalk directly behind the proposed right-of-way, followed by a 4-foot wide landscaped area behind sidewalk, and then a 10-foot wide multi-use trail. |
LD92. | (PPA) Prior to approval of a plot plan for any project on Parcel 3 of PM 35629, proposed pad and site elevations shall be coordinated with the most current available Redlands Boulevard interchange improvement plans. | |
LD93. | (CO) Redlands Boulevard improvements shall be coordinated with the Citys Capital Project Redlands Boulevard/SR60 Interchange Project. Interim improvements shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer and shall be constructed prior to the occupancy of any building in Phase 3. The project design shall accommodate the future ultimate improvements on Redlands Boulevard Divided Arterial, City Standard 103A (131 RW / 107 CC Modified) to half-width plus an additional 21 feet west of the centerline, along the entire projects east frontage. Future ultimate |
38
improvements shall consist of, but not be limited to, pavement, base, redwood header, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, drainage structures, any necessary offsite improvement transition/joins to existing, streetlights, pedestrian ramps, removal/relocation and/or undergrounding of any power poles with overhead utility lines less than 115,000 volts, and dry and wet utilities. In addition, the following improvements shall be provided within an 18-foot wide bike trail and pedestrian access easement: a 2-foot wide portion of sidewalk located outside of the proposed sidewalk, a 4-foot wide landscaped area behind sidewalk, a 10-foot wide bike trail behind the 4-foot wide landscaped area, and a 2-foot wide flat landscape area. In addition, intersection improvements at Eucalyptus Avenue shall be made to allow for truck turning movements required in the projects approved Traffic Study for Phase 1 of the project. Additional improvements will be identified within the supplemental traffic study required for Phases 2 and 3 planning application development plans. Ultimate improvements shall be coordinated with the Citys Capital Project Theodore Street/SR-60 Interchange Project and/or interim improvements shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer. |
39
SD-1 | The parcel(s) associated with this project have been incorporated into the Moreno Valley Community Services Districts Zones A (Parks & Community Services) and C (Arterial Street Lighting). All assessable parcels therein shall be subject to annual Zone A and Zone C charges for operations and capital improvements. | ||
SD-2 | Plans for parkway, median, slope, and/or open space landscape areas designated on the tentative map or in these Conditions of Approval for incorporation into Moreno Valley Community Services District Zone M , shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the City of Moreno Valley Public Works Department Landscape Design Guidelines. Contact the Special Districts Division of the Public Works Department to obtain copies of this document. | ||
SD-3 | The Developer, or the Developers successors or assignees shall be responsible for all parkway and/ or median landscaping maintenance until such time as the District accepts maintenance duties. |
40
SD-4 | Any damage to existing landscape easement areas due to project construction shall be repaired/replaced by the Developer, or Developers successors in interest, at no cost to the Moreno Valley Community Services District. |
SD-5 | (R) This project has been identified to be included in the formation of a Community Facilities District (Mello-Roos) for Public Safety services, including but not limited to Police, Fire Protection, Paramedic Services, Park Rangers, and Animal Control services. The property owner(s) shall not protest the formation; however, they retain the right to object to the rate and method of maximum special tax. In compliance with Proposition 218, the Developer shall agree to approve the mail ballot proceeding (special election) for either formation of the CFD or annexation into an existing district that may already be established. The Developer must notify Special Districts of intent to record final map prior to City Council action authorizing recordation of the map. (California Government Code) This condition would no longer apply if the final map is recorded prior to the formation of the Public Safety Community Facilities District. | ||
SD-6 | (R) This project is conditioned to provide a funding source for the capital improvements and/or maintenance for the Eucalyptus Ave. median landscape. In order for the Developer to meet the financial responsibility to maintain the defined service, one of the following options shall be selected: |
a. | Participate in the mail ballot proceeding in compliance with Proposition 218, for Moreno Valley Community Services District Zone M (Commercial, Industrial and Multifamily Improved Median Maintenance), and pay all associated costs with the ballot process; or | ||
b. | Establish an endowment to cover the future maintenance costs of the landscaped area. |
The Developer must notify Special Districts of intent to record final map prior to City Council action authorizing recordation of the map and the financial option selected to fund the continued maintenance. | |||
SD-7 | Commercial (R) Land Development, a Division of the Public Works Department, requires this project to supply a funding source necessary to provide, but not limited to, stormwater utilities services for the monitoring |
41
of on site facilities and performing annual inspections of the affected areas to ensure compliance with state mandated stormwater regulations, the Developer must notify Special Districts of intent to record final map prior to City Council action authorizing recordation of the map and the financial option selected to fund the continued maintenance. (California Government Code) | |||
SD-8 | (R) Prior to recordation of the final map, the Developer, or the Developers successors or assignees, shall record with the County Recorders Office a Declaration of Covenant and Acknowledgement of Assessments for each assessable parcel therein, whereby the Developer covenants and acknowledges the existence of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, its established benefit zones, and that said parcel(s) is (are) liable for payment of annual benefit zone charges and the appropriate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) maximum regulatory rate schedule when due. A copy of the recorded Declaration of Covenant and Acknowledgement of Assessments shall be submitted to the Special Districts Division. | ||
** For a copy of the Declaration of Covenant and Acknowledgement of the Assessments form, please contact Special Districts, phone 951.413.3480. |
SD-9 | (BP) This project has been identified to be included in the formation of a Map Act Area of Benefit Special District for the construction of major thoroughfares and/or freeway improvements. The property owner(s) shall participate in such District, and pay any special tax, assessment, or fee levied upon the project property for such District. At the time of the public hearing to consider formation of the district, the property owner(s) will not protest the formation, but the property owners(s) will retain the right to object if any eventual assessment is not equitable, that is, if the financial burden of the assessment is not reasonably proportionate to the benefit which the affected property obtains from the improvements which are to be installed. (Street & Highway Code, GP Objective 2.14.2, MC 9.14.100) Once the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) is paid, the requirement to annex into the Special District would no longer be applicable. | ||
SD-10 | (BP) Final median, parkway, slope, and/or open space landscape/irrigation plans for those areas designated on the tentative map or in these Conditions of Approval for inclusion into Community Services District shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development |
42
SD-11 | (CO) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the Developer shall submit a letter to Special Districts from the Utility service responsible for providing final electrical energy connections and energization of the streetlights for the development project. The letter must identify, by pole number, each streetlight in the development and state the corresponding date of its electrical energization. |
SD-12 | (CO) All median landscaping specified in the tentative map or in these Conditions of Approval shall be constructed pursuant to the project phasing plan dated December 10, 2008. |
SD-13 | (CO) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the Developer shall submit, in a form acceptable to Special Districts, the current list of all Assessors Parcel Numbers assigned to the recorded map. Please forward to: |
SD-14 | (CO) Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy or building final for this project, the Developer shall pay Advanced Energy fees for all applicable Zone B (Residential Street Lighting) and/or Zone C (Arterial Street Lighting and Intersection Lighting) streetlights required for this development. The Developer shall provide a receipt to the Special Districts Division showing that the Advanced Energy fees have been paid in full for the number of streetlights to be accepted into the CSD Zone B and/or Zone C program. Payment shall be made to the City of Moreno Valley, as collected by the Land Development Division, based upon the Advanced Energy fee rate at the time of payment and as set forth in the current Listing of City Fees, Charges and Rates, as adopted by City Council. Any change in the project which may increase the number of streetlights to be installed will require payment of additional Advanced Energy fees at the then current fee. |
43
TE1. | Install Citywide Communication System (Traffic Signal Interconnect) per City Standards along Eucalyptus Avenue and Theodore Street. |
TE2. | A Class I Bikeway is planned for the east side of Redlands Boulevard that shall require additional right-of-way and/or easements. |
TE3. | The project applicant shall submit supplemental traffic studies at the time of entitlement of Phase 2 (Parcels 2 and 3) and again at Phase 3 (Parcel 4). The supplemental traffic studies shall address improvements necessary for the two phases that could include but not be limited to traffic signals, additional turn lanes, traffic signal synchronization/timing, interchange improvements, fair share contributions, median construction, and traffic control at project driveways. Conditions of approval for Phase 2 and Phase 3 plot plans shall be based upon the findings of the supplemental traffic studies, and conditioned improvements shall be required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the respective phases. |
TE4. | (GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Phase 1, the project applicant shall submit conceptual striping plans for street improvements along Eucalyptus Avenue as well as Theodore Street. |
TE5. | The driveways less than 40 feet in width shall conform to Section 9.16.250, and Table 9.16.250A of the Citys Development Code Design Guidelines, and City |
44
TE6. | Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans, a signing and striping plan shall be prepared per City of Moreno Valley Standard Plans Section 4 for all streets with a cross section of 66/44 and wider (Advisory). |
TE7. | Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans, the developer shall submit to the City a contract between the developer and a street sweeping company for sweeping the streets during the warranty period, for the day shown on the posted street sweeping signage. The contract shall include a contact person and phone number for said contact person (Advisory). |
TE8. | Prior to issuance of a construction permit, construction traffic control plans prepared by a qualified, Registered Civil or Traffic engineer shall be required (Advisory). |
TE9. | Sight distance at driveways and on streets shall conform to City Standard Plan No. 125 A, B, and C at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape, and street improvements (Advisory). |
TE10. | Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans, interim and ultimate alignment studies shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. |
TE11. | Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 1, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Theodore Street and Eucalyptus Avenue to provide the following geometrics: | |
Northbound: One left turn lane, one through lane
Southbound: One through lane, one right turn lane Eastbound: One left turn lane, one right turn lane Westbound: N/A |
||
NOTE: All curb return radii shall be 50 feet. |
TE12. | Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 1, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Theodore Street and SR-60 Eastbound Ramp to provide the following geometrics: | |
Northbound: One left turn lane, one through lane
Southbound: One shared through/right turn lane Eastbound: One left turn lane, one right turn lane Westbound: N/A |
||
NOTE: All curb return radii shall be 50 feet. |
45
TE13. | Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 1, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Theodore Street and SR-60 Westbound Ramp to provide the following geometrics: | |
Northbound: One through lane, pavement widening to accommodate turning trucks
Southbound: One shared left turn/through lane Eastbound: N/A Westbound: One shared left turn/right turn lane |
TE14. | Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 3, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Redlands Boulevard and Eucalyptus Avenue for its ultimate cross-section to include the following: | |
Northbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane
Southbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane Eastbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane Westbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane |
||
NOTE: All curb return radii shall be 50 feet. |
TE15. | Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans, the project applicant shall design bus bays per City Standard Plan No. 121 at the following locations: |
| Northbound Redlands Boulevard, north of Eucalyptus Avenue (Phase 3) | ||
| Eastbound Eucalyptus Avenue, east of Redlands Boulevard (Phase 3) | ||
| Westbound Eucalyptus Avenue, west of Theodore Street (Phase 2) | ||
| Westbound Eucalyptus Avenue, west of project driveway aligned with Sinclair Street (Phase 2) |
PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR BUILDING FINAL |
TE16. | (CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all approved signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards and the approved plans (Advisory). |
TE17. | (CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 1, the project applicant shall construct the intersection/roadway improvements identified in TE11, TE12, and TE13 per the approved plans. |
TE18. | (CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 3, the project applicant shall construct the east leg of the Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus |
46
TE19. | (CO) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project, driveway access at the following locations will be installed as follows: |
| The easternmost driveway: full access. | ||
| The second driveway from the east: right-in, right-out access by means of a raised median. | ||
| The third driveway from the east (employee parking lot): full access. | ||
| The second driveway from the west: right-in, right-out by means of a raised median. | ||
| The westernmost driveway: full access. | ||
| Additional driveways for Phases 2 and 3 shall be reviewed at the time of their entitlement, and conditions of approval shall be prepared as necessary regarding access. |
TE20. | Prior to the acceptance of streets into the City-maintained road system, all approved traffic control and signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards and the approved plans (Advisory). |
47
48
Parks and Community Services Department
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. PA07-0091 Plot Plan |
December 29, 2008 |
a. | Trail and bikeway construction shall adhere to: The Citys Standard Plans, The Greenbook Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, California Code of Regulations Title 24 (where applicable), and the Park and Community Services Specification Guide. (Advisory Condition) | |
b. | The General Contractor shall be a State of California Class A General Engineering Contractor, per the Business and Professions Code Section 7056, or a combination of State of California Class C licenses for which the work is being performed. Licenses must be current and in good standing, for the duration of the project. (Advisory Condition) | |
c. | Trails and bikeways shall not be shared with any above ground utilities, blocking total width access. (Advisory) | |
d. | The following plans require Parks and Community Services written approval: Tentative tract/parcel maps; rough grading plans (including all Delta changes); Final Map; precise grading plans; street improvement plans; traffic signal plans; fence and wall plans; landscape plans for areas adjacent to trails; trail improvement plans. (Advisory) | |
e. | (GP) A detailed rough grading plan with profile for the trail shall be submitted and approved by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee prior to the issuance of grading permits. (Advisory) | |
f. | Grading certification and compaction tests for trails and bikeways are required, prior to any trail or bikeway improvements being installed. (Advisory) | |
g. | A minimum two-foot graded bench is required where trails adjoin landscaped or open space areas. (Advisory) | |
h. | (BP) Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, final improvement plans (mylars and AutoCAD & PDF file on a CD-ROM) shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department Planning Division; the Public Works Department Land Development and Transportation Division; Fire Prevention; and Parks and Community Services Department. Landscaped areas adjacent to the trail or bikeway shall be designed to prevent water on the trail or bikeway. (Advisory) | |
i. | Two sets of complete trail and bikeway improvement plans shall be submitted to Parks and Community Services for routing. Adjacent landscaping and walls shall be shown on the plans. Final construction plans and details require wet stamped and signed Mylars, eight sets of bond copies and one Mylar copy from the City signed mylars, the AutoCAD file on CD, and a PDF file on CD. As-builts for the trails and bikeways have the same requirements as final plan submittals. (Advisory) | |
j. | All street crossings shall be signed with approved STOP signs, trail signs, and posts. All improved equestrian trail crossings at signalized intersections that are constructed at their ultimate locations shall have 6 high mounted push buttons. These shall be coordinated through the Transportation Division. (Advisory) | |
k. | CSD Zone A plan check fees shall be paid prior to the second plan check. (Advisory) | |
i. | CSD Zone A inspection fees shall be paid prior to signing of Mylars. (Advisory) |
49
Parks and Community Services Department
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. PA07-0091 Plot Plan |
December 29, 2008 |
m. | The trail and bikeway shall be surveyed and staked by the developer. The trail shall be inspected and approved by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee prior to the commencement of related work. (Advisory) |
n. | Any damage to bikeways, trails, or fencing during construction shall be repaired by the developer and inspected by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee; prior to Certificate of Occupancy. (Advisory) |
o. | Concrete access areas to trails with decomposed granite surfaces shall be rough finished concrete (typically tine finish). The access shall extend to the main trail flat surface. (Advisory) |
p. | In order to prevent the delay of building permit issuance, any deviation from trail fencing materials or trail surface materials shall be submitted to Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee and approved in writing 60-days prior to the commencement of trail construction. (Advisory) |
q. | Any unauthorized deviation from the approved plan, specifications, City Standard Plans, or Conditions of Approval may result in the delay of building permit issuance and/or building Finals/ Certificate of Occupancy of the project conditioned for improvements. (Advisory) |
r. | Where required, decorative solid-grouted block wall (no precision block, stucco, veneer finishes, PVC, or wood fencing) with a minimum height of 72 on the trailside shall be installed along lots that adjoin the trail. Block walls shall be located solely on private property. If landscaping is to be utilized between the block wall and the trail, a PVC fence shall be installed along the trail separating the landscaping from the trail (where required). All block walls that have public view shall have an anti-graffiti coating per Parks and Community Services specifications. Combination block/tubular steel fences shall only be utilized where approved by Parks and Community Services. Tubular steel shall comply with Parks and Community Services standards. Coating for tubular steel shall be anti-graffiti coating for metal per Parks and Community Services specifications. If alternate products are requested, the requested material(s) shall be presented to, the Director of Parks and Community Services or his/her designee for review and approval. Under no circumstances can alternate products be utilized without prior written authorization from the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee. (Advisory) |
s. | Any damage to existing landscape or hardscape areas due to project construction shall be repaired/replaced by the developer, or developers successors in interest, at no cost to the City or Community Services District. (Advisory) |
t. | All inspections shall be requested two (2) working days in advance from the Parks and Community Services Department at the time of rough and precise grading; fence and gate installation; curb and drainage; flatwork; D.G. installation; graffiti coating; and final inspection. (Advisory) |
50
PD1. | Prior to the start of any construction, temporary security fencing shall be erected. The fencing shall be a minimum of six (6) feet high with locking, gated access and shall remain through the duration of construction. Security fencing is required if there is: construction, unsecured structures, unenclosed storage of materials and/or equipment, and/or the condition of the site constitutes a public hazard as determined by the Public Works Department. If security fencing is required, it shall remain in place until the project is completed or the above conditions no longer exist. (DC 9.08.080) (Advisory) |
PD2. | (GP) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a temporary project identification sign shall be erected on the site in a secure and visible manner. The sign shall be conspicuously posted at the site and remain in place until occupancy of the project. The sign shall include the following: |
a. | The name (if applicable) and address of the development. | ||
b. | The developers name, address, and a 24-hour emergency telephone number. (DC 9.08.080) (Advisory) |
51
MVU-1 | (R) If the project is a multi-family development, townhome, condominium, apartment, commercial or industrial project, and it requires the installation of electric distribution facilities within common areas, a non-exclusive easement shall be provided to Moreno Valley Utility to include all such common areas. All easements shall include the rights of ingress and egress for the purpose of operation, maintenance, facility repair, and meter reading. |
MVU-2 | (BP) City of Moreno Valley Municipal Utility Service Electrical Distribution: Prior to issuance of building permit, the developer shall submit a detailed engineering plan showing design, location and schematics for the utility system to be approved by the City Engineer. In accordance with Government Code Section 66462, the Developer shall execute an agreement with the City providing for the installation, construction, improvement and dedication of the utility system following recordation of final map and concurrent with trenching operations and other subdivision improvements so long as said agreement incorporates the approved engineering plan and provides financial security to guarantee completion and dedication of the utility system. | |
The Developer shall coordinate and receive approval from the City Engineer to install, construct, improve, and dedicate to the City, or the Citys designee, all utility infrastructure (including but not limited to conduit, equipment, vaults, ducts, wires, switches, conductors, transformers, resistors, amplifiers, and bring-up facilities including electrical capacity to serve the identified development and other adjoining/abutting/ or benefiting projects as determined by Moreno Valley Utility) - collectively referred to as utility system (to and through the development), along with any appurtenant real property easements, as determined by the City Engineer to be necessary for the distribution and /or delivery of any and all utility services to each lot and unit within the Tentative Map. For purposes of this condition, utility services shall mean electric service and utility-related telecommunication only Utility services shall not include sewer, water, and natural gas services, which are addressed by other conditions of approval. Properties within development will be subject to an electrical system capacity charge and that contribution will be collected prior to issuance of building permits. |
52
MVU-2A | The City, or the Citys designee, shall utilize dedicated utility facilities to ensure safe, reliable, sustainable and cost effective delivery of utility services and maintain the integrity of streets and other public infrastructure. Developer shall, at developers sole expense, install or cause the installation of such interconnection facilities as may be necessary to connect the electrical distribution infrastructure within the project to the Moreno Valley Utility owned and controlled electric distribution system. Alternatively, developer may cause the project to be included in or annexed to a community facilities district established or to be established by the City for the purpose of financing the installation of such interconnection and distribution facilities. The project shall be deemed to have been included in or annexed to such a community facilities district upon the expiration of the statute of limitations to any legal challenges to the levy of special taxes by such community facilities district within the property. The statute of limitations referred to above will expire 30 days after the date of the election by the qualified electors within the project to authorize the levy of special taxes and the issuance of bonds. | |
The installation of any proposed temporary overhead electric distribution lines to be constructed to serve the subject project will be installed/executed pursuant to a temporary utility service agreement. The service agreement will address such things as the necessary electrical circuit protection, as well as the requirement to permanently relocate any temporary overhead to a permanent underground system in a timely manner (not greater than 36 months) consistent with the requirements of the service agreement and pursuant to applicable state law. | ||
An electrical protection coordination study shall be performed and stamped by a registered professional electrical engineer in the State of California and submitted to the utility for review and approval prior to construction of the temporary overhead line consistent with the service agreement. | ||
Once the protection settings are approved and test reports performed, a certified apparatus technician shall be submitted to the utility for review. Any protection studies shall be stamped by the applicants registered professional electrical engineer. | ||
A specific easement will be required for the entire overhead line extension constructed outside of the public right-of-way consistent with the service agreement. |
53
MVU-3 | This project may be subject to a Reimbursement Agreement. The project may be responsible for a proportionate share of costs associated with electrical distribution infrastructure previously installed that directly benefits the project. The project may be subject to a system wide capacity charge in addition to the referenced reimbursement agreement; Payment(s) shall be required prior to issuance of building permit(s). |
54
1
A. | This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth above in this Resolution are true and correct. | ||
B. | Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the meetings on February 3, 2009 and February 10, 2009, including written and oral staff reports, and the record from the public hearing, this Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: |
1. | Conformance with General Plan Policies The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan, and its goals, objectives, policies and programs. | ||
FACT: The project proposes an approximately 1,820,000 square foot warehouse industrial building on Parcel 1 (Phase 1) with related commercial/retail and office uses. The proposal conforms, with the Business Park or BP General Plan designation, which allows for a variety of industrial related land uses from office and business park uses to heavier industrial land uses. | |||
Greater compatibility of the proposed land use with surrounding land uses in the general vicinity of the project will be achieved by project design, mitigation and conditions of approval. For example, dense landscape and proposed 11 foot screen walls used for screening purposes will allow for necessary compatibility of the intended industrial warehouse use with any surrounding commercial, business park or residential properties in the general vicinity that would be developed in the future. | |||
2. | Conformance with Zoning Regulations The proposed use complies with all applicable zoning and other regulations. | ||
FACT: The proposed project does not currently conform with zoning regulations of Business Park (BP), which would only allow for industrial buildings of 50,000 square feet or less from being developed. With a proposed 1,820,000 square foot warehouse industrial building, the applicant is requesting a change of zone to Light Industrial or LI. A 1,820,000 square foot warehouse building is |
2
a permitted used within the LI land use designation. Various conditions of approval have also been included to address specific requirements, including but not limited to site improvements and aesthetic enhancements. |
3. | Health, Safety and Welfare The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. | ||
FACT: An Environmental Impact report (EIR) has been prepared for the overall project, including the proposed Change of Zone and General Plan amendment. Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for said project to deal with impacts related to aesthetics, agriculture, air quality, noise, as well as climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Said EIR is required to be certified and approved as a part of the proposed project. Said document will also be accompanied by a Mitigation Monitoring Program, which will ensure the completion of required mitigation measures for the project. The project site is surrounded by Highway 60 to the north, and primarily vacant residential property to the south east and west. | |||
Specific mitigation measures have been provided to lessen the impacts (but not all below significant levels) for public health, safety and the welfare of surrounding properties and improvements in the vicinity of the project. This includes, but is not limited to the limitation of project lighting and glare, and enhanced architectural and landscaping treatment to soften views and reduce visual character as well as light and glare to less than significant levels for aesthetics. Air quality mitigation measures include a fugitive dust control plan with application of best management practices to control fugitive dust during construction, emission control equipment with a minimum of Tier II diesel particulate filter emission controls resulting in a minimum 50 percent particulate matter control, proper maintenance of construction equipment, a traffic control plan to minimize operational truck traffic and dust during construction, as well as low VOC paints, and other best management practices. Noise mitigation measures include the restriction of construction vehicles on Redlands Boulevard, south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, the restriction of nighttime grading within 1,200 feet of residences south of future Eucalyptus Avenue, specific sound barriers in place to limit daytime construction noise, equipment maintenance to include silencers, mufflers and acoustic covers, and the restriction of material stockpiles within 1,200 feet of all residences south of Highway 60. It is also important to note that |
3
an approximate 440 foot land use buffer is included as a land use mitigation measure to buffer the proposed project from future sensitive receptors which could be built south of the site. Other mitigation measures throughout the EIR reduce the remaining environmental impacts rioted in the EIR to less than significant levels. | |||
With the above mitigation measures imposed for noise, air quality, climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, aesthetics and agricultural and traffic impacts, any environmental impacts from the proposed project and use will be significantly reduced but are still considered as significant and unavoidable, thereby requiring a statement of overriding considerations. Said mitigation measures included with the project will lessen environmental impacts on any existing or future properties within the general vicinity on the proposed development, and project and reduce impacts to public health, safety and welfare. | |||
4. | Location, Design and Operation The location, design and operation of the proposed project will be compatible with existing and planned land uses in the vicinity. | ||
FACT: Surrounding land uses include Highway 60 to the north, vacant commercial land uses to the west, vacant business park uses to the east and vacant R-3 (Residential 3) single-family residential properties to the south of the site. The location, design and operation of the proposed project will be compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general vicinity with proposed mitigation measures, conditions of approval and design of the plot plan and architecture of the buildings. For example, dense landscape and proposed 11 foot screen walls provided for screening purposes will allow for necessary compatibility of the use with any surrounding properties in the general vicinity that would be developed in the future. | |||
With the mitigation measures imposed for noise, air quality, climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, aesthetics and agricultural and traffic impacts, including an approximate 440 foot buffer from the property line of the proposed property preventing development to occur on any of the land planned and zoned for residential development immediately to the south of the subject site, any environmental impacts from the proposed, project and use will be significantly reduced. Said mitigation measures included with the project will lessen environmental impacts on any existing or future properties within the general vicinity of the proposed development |
4
and project, reduce impacts to public health; safety and welfare, and provide greater compatibility of land uses between the proposed project and surrounding properties in the general vicinity. | |||
5. | The project conforms with any applicable provisions of the Citys redevelopment plan. | ||
FACT: The project site does not reside in a redevelopment area or within the plan. |
C. | FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND OTHER EXACTIONS |
5
failure to timely follow this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void or annul imposition. | |||
Your right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does, not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with this project, and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions of which you have been given a notice similar to this nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. |
|
||
|
/s/ ILLEGIBLE | |
|
||
|
Mayor | |
|
||
ATTEST:
|
||
|
||
|
||
/s/
JANE HALSTEAD
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
|
||
|
||
|
||
/s/ ILLEGIBLE
|
||
|
6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
) | |||||
|
||||||
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
|
) ss. | |||||
|
||||||
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
|
) |
AYES:
|
Council Members Batey, Hastings, Molina, Mayor Pro Tem Flickinger and Mayor Stewart | |
|
||
NOES:
|
None | |
|
||
ABSENT:
|
None | |
|
||
ABSTAIN:
|
None |
/s/ JANE HALSTEAD
|
||
CITY CLERK | ||
(SEAL) |
7
APPROVAL DATE:
|
February 10, 2009 | |
EXPIRATION DATE:
|
February 10, 2012 |
x | Planning (P), including School District (S), Post Office (PO), Building (B) |
x | Fire Prevention Bureau (F) |
x | Public Works, Land Development (LD) |
x | Public Works, Special Districts (SD) |
x | Public Works Transportation Engineering (TE) |
x | Parks & Community Services (PCS) |
x | Police (PD) |
x | Moreno Valley Utilities |
o | Other (Specify or Delete) |
P1. | This approval shall expire three years after the approval date of this project unless used or extended as provided for by the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code; |
R Map Recordation
|
GP Grading Permits | CO Certificate of Occupancy or building final | ||
WP Water Improvement Plans
|
BP Building Permits | P Any permit |
GP General Plan
|
MC Municipal Code | CEQA California Environmental Quality Act | ||
Ord Ordinance
|
DG Design Guidelines | Ldscp Landscape Development Guidelines and Specs | ||
Res Resolution
|
UFC Uniform Fire Code | UBC Uniform Building Code | ||
|
SBM Subdivision Map Act |
8 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. (MC 9.02.230) (Advisory) |
P2. | The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Community Development Department Planning Division, the Municipal Code regulations, General Plan, and the conditions contained herein. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planning Official. (MC 9.14.020) (Advisory) |
P3. | The developer, or the developers successor-in-interest, shall be responsible for maintaining any undeveloped portion of the site in a manner that provides for the control of weeds, erosion and dust. (MC 9.02.030) (Advisory) |
P4. | A drought tolerant, low water using landscape palette shall be utilized throughout the project. |
P5. | All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash and debris. (MC 9.02.030) (Advisory) |
P6. | Any signs indicated on the submitted plans are not included with this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the sign provisions of the Development Code or approved sign program, if applicable, and shall require separate application and approval by the Community Development Department Planning Division. (MC 9.12.020) |
P7. | (GP) All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, fence/wall plans, lighting plans and street improvement plans shall be consistent with this approval. (Advisory) |
9 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
P8. | (GP) Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the developer shall submit for review and approval of a tree plan to the Planning Division. The plan shall identify all mature trees (4 inch trunk diameter or larger) on the subject property and City right-of-way. Using the grading plan as a base, the plan shall indicate trees to be relocated, retained, and removed. Replacement trees shall be: shown on the landscape/irrigation plan; be a minimum size of 24 inch box; and meet a ratio of three replacement trees for each mature tree removed or as approved by the Community Development Director. (GP Objective 4.4, 4.5, DG) |
P9. | (GP) Prior to approval of any precise grading permits, plans for any security gate system shall be submitted to the Community Development Department Planning Division for review and approval. |
P10. | (GP) Prior to approval of any grading permits, the developer shall submit final landscape and irrigation plans within the State Highway 60 right-of-way adjacent to the project site consistent with the State Highway 60 Corridor Design Manual. The plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department Planning Division for review and approval. (MC 9.14.100) |
P11. | (GP) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits and prior to any physical disturbance of any natural drainage course, for any area determined to contain riparian vegetation, the applicant shall obtain a stream bed alteration agreement or permit, or a written waiver of the requirement for such an agreement or permit, from both the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Written verification of such a permit or waiver shall be provided to the Community Development Department Planning Division and the Public Works Department Land Development Division. (CEQA, State and Federal codes) |
P12. | (GP) Prior to issuance of any grading permits, mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved with this project shall be implemented as provided therein. (CEQA) (Advisory) |
P13. | (GP) Decorative pedestrian pathways shall be shown on the precise grading plan. (Advisory) (GP Objective 46.8, DG) |
10 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
P14. | (GP) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall submit wall/fence plans to the Planning Division for review and approval for all fences and walls required or proposed on site, included, but not limited to the 11 foot screening wall along the perimeter of the site including pilasters and caps or alternative design as approved by the Community Development Director. (MC 9.08.070) |
P15. | (GP) Prior to approval of a precise grading plan, final landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department Planning Division for review. All landscape plans shall be approved prior to the release of any building permits for the site. After the third plan check review for landscape plans, an additional plan check fee shall apply. The plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Citys Landscape Standards and Specifications and shall include: |
A. A landscape berm, hedge or a maximum 3 foot decorative wall is required adjacent to parking areas along all public rights-of-way. |
B. All finger and end planters shall be included at an interval of one per 12 parking stalls, be a minimum 5 x 16, and include additional 12 concrete step-outs and 6 curbing. (MC9.08.230, Citys Landscape Standards) |
C. All diamond planters shall be included at an interval of one per 3 parking stalls. |
D. Drought tolerant landscape shall be provided. |
E. Trees shall be planted at an equivalent of one (1) tree per thirty (30) linear feet of building dimension. Trees may be massed for pleasing aesthetic effects. |
F. Enhanced landscaping shall be included at all driveway and corner locations as well as along Highway 60 to provide proper screening of trucks. |
G. All site perimeter and parking lot landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of certificate of any occupancy permits for the site or pad in question (master plot plan). |
H. The review of all utility boxes, transformers etc. shall be coordinated to provide adequate screening from public view. (Landscape Guidelines) |
I. Landscaping on three sides of all trash enclosures shall be provided. |
J. Dense landscape (spacing of one tree per 20 feet) shall be placed in front of the wall along all designated yard areas and vines shall be planted at the base of the wall and be directed along said wall. |
K. A minimum size of 36 box mature trees shall be placed along the freeway or northern elevations of the building. |
L. Minimum 24 inch box Eucalyptus Nicholii shall be used for the street |
11 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
trees along the Eucalyptus Avenue frontage. Spacing of trees shall be limited to 80 foot on center for parkways and medians in sight line distance areas noted on the plans; however trees to the equivalency of 40 foot on center shall be planted in the parkway for the entire site. Additional denser parkway tree placement (between 25 to 30 feet on center) would be required for areas outside of the line of sight A preferred alternative to placing trees only on the designated parkway landscape areas would be to widen the four foot landscape separation between the sidewalk and trail to 8 feet and reduce the parkway landscape to 8 feet in site line distance areas to provide additional trees within the designated line of sight areas alternating at 80 foot spacing to achieve the overall 40 foot spacing requirement. |
M. Focal entries of the site on Eucalyptus Avenue are void of trees and or shrubs on the preliminary landscape plan and they shall be shown on the plans, or alternatively document on the landscape and tree plans that the equivalency of one tree per 30 linear feet of building dimension visible from the parking lot and all public rights of away in addition to on tree per 30 linear feet of parking lot adjacent to the interior property is being met. |
P16. | (BP) Prior to issuance of building permits, the Community Development Department Planning Division shall review and approve the location and method of enclosure or screening of transformer cabinets, commercial gas meters and back flow preventers as shown on the final working drawings. Location and screening shall comply with the following criteria: transformer cabinets and commercial gas meters shall not be located within required setbacks and shall be screened from public view either by architectural treatment or with landscaping; multiple electrical meters shall be fully enclosed and incorporated into the overall architectural design of the building(s); back-flow preventers shall be screened by landscaping that will provide complete screening upon maturity. (GP Objective 43.30, DG) (Advisory) |
P17. | (BP) Prior to issuance of building permits, screening details shall be addressed on plans for roof top equipment and trash enclosures submitted for Community Development Department Planning Division review and approval. All equipment shall be completely screened so as not to be visible from public view, and the screening shall be an integral part of the building. For trash enclosures, landscaping shall be included on at least three sides. The trash enclosure, including any roofing, shall be compatible with the architecture for the building(s). |
12 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
(GP Objective 43.6, DG) (Advisory) |
P18. | (BP) Prior to issuance of building permits, two copies of a detailed, on-site, computer generated, point-by-point comparison lighting plan, including exterior building, parking lot, and landscaping lighting, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department Planning Division for review and approval. The lighting plan shall be generated on the plot plan and shall be integrated with the final landscape plan. The plan shall indicate the manufacturers specifications for light fixtures used and shall include style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. The fighting shall be designed in such a manner so that it does not exceed 0.5 foot candles illumination beyond at the property line. The lighting level for all parking lots or structures shall be a minimum coverage of one foot-candle of light with a maximum of eight foot-candles. After the third plan check review for lighting plans, an additional plan check fee will apply. (MC 9.08.100, DG) (Advisory) |
P19. | (BP) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer or developers successor-in-interest shall pay all applicable impact fees, including but not limited to Transportation Uniform Mitigation fees (TUMF), Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) mitigation fees, and the Citys adopted Development Impact Fees. (Ord) (Advisory) |
P20. | (P) Prior to issuance of building permits, final landscaping and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the release of any building permits for the site. After the third plan check review for landscape plans, an additional plan check fee shall apply. The plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Citys Landscape Standards and Specifications and shall include: |
A. A landscape berm, hedge or a maximum 3 foot decorative wall is required adjacent to parking areas along all public rights-of-way. |
B. All finger and end planters shall be included at an interval of one per 12 parking stalls, be a minimum 5 x 16, and include additional 12 concrete step-outs and 6 curbing. (MC9.08.230, Citys Landscape Standards) |
C. All diamond planters shall be included at an interval of one per 3 parking stalls. |
D. Drought tolerant landscape shall be provided. |
E. Trees shall be planted at an equivalent of one (1) tree per thirty (30) linear feet of building dimension. Trees may be massed for pleasing aesthetic effects. |
F. Enhanced landscaping shall be included at all driveway and corner locations as well as along Highway 60 to provide proper screening of trucks. |
13 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
G. All site perimeter and parking lot landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of certificate of any occupancy permits for the site or pad in question (master plot plan). |
H. The review of all utility boxes, transformers etc. shall be coordinated to provide adequate screening from public view. (Landscape Guidelines) | |||
I. Landscaping on three sides of all trash enclosures shall be provided. | |||
J. Dense landscape (spacing of one tree per 20 feet) shall be placed in front of the wall along all designated yard areas and vines shall be planted at the base of the wall and be directed along said wall. |
K. A minimum size of 36 box mature trees shall be placed along the freeway or northern elevations of the building. |
L. Minimum 24 inch box Eucalyptus Nicholii shall be used for the street trees along the Eucalyptus Avenue frontage. Spacing of trees shall be limited to 80 foot on center for parkways and medians in sight line distance areas noted on the plans; however trees to the equivalency of 40 foot on center shall be planted in the parkway for the entire site. Additional denser parkway tree placement (between 25 to 30 feet on center) would be possible for areas outside of the line of sight. An alternative to placing trees only on the designated parkway landscape areas would be to widen the four foot landscape separation between the sidewalk and trail to 8 feet and reduce the parkway landscape to 8 feet in site line distance areas to provide additional trees within the designated line of sight areas. |
M. Focal entries of the site on Eucalyptus Avenue are void of trees and or shrubs on the preliminary landscape plan and they shall be shown on the plans, or alternatively document on the landscape and tree plans that the equivalency of one tree per 30 linear feet of building dimension visible from the parking lot and all public rights of away in addition to on tree per 30 linear feet of parking lot adjacent to the interior property is being met. |
P21. | Prior to the issuance of building permits, landscape and irrigation plans for common areas maintained by the Property Owners Association shall be submitted to the Community Development Department Planning Division. All landscape plans shall be approved prior to the release of any building permits for the site. The plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Citys Landscape Development Guidelines. Landscaping is required for the sides and or slopes of all water quality basin and drainage areas, while a hydroseed mix w/irrigation is acceptable for the bottom of the basin areas. All detention basins shall include trees, shrubs and groundcover up to the concreted portion of the basin. A solid decorative wall with pilasters, tubular steel fence |
14 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 15
with pilasters or other fence or wall approved by the Community Development
Director is required to secure all water quality and detention basins.
P22.
(BP) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the landscape plans shall
include landscape treatment for trash enclosures to include landscape on three
sides, and trash enclosures shall include decorative enhancements such as an
enclosed roof and other decorative features that are consistent with the
architecture of the proposed commercial buildings on the site, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director.
P23.
(BP) Prior to the issuance of building permits, all fences and walls required or
proposed on site, shall be approved by the Community Development Director. (MC
9.08.070)
P24.
(BP) Prior to issuance of a building permit for Phase 1, proof of a driveway
reciprocal access easement between Parcels 1 and 4 shall be provided to the
Public Works and Community Development Department.
P25.
(BP) Downspouts will be interior to the building, or if exterior, integrated
into the architecture of the building to include compatible colors and materials
to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This item shall be
noted on the final plot plan drawings.
P26.
(BP) Prior to the issuance of building permits, evidence of a reciprocal access
easement agreement for Parcel 4, including the maintenance of trees and other
landscape materials would be required.
P27.
(BP) Prior to the issuance of building permits, a full elevation set, including
the northeast focal point of the building adjacent to Highway 60 and Theodore
Street, shall be submitted. Said elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission prior to the release of any building permits.
P28.
(BP) Prior to the issuance of building
permits, the precise grade or final landscape
plans shall include decorative paving at all
driveway locations.
15
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
P29. | (CO) Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy or building final, all required landscaping, buildings, lighting, parking lot improvements including, but limited to paving and striping, and irrigation shall be installed for the required phase. (DC 9.03.040) (Advisory) |
P30. | (CO) Prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy or building final, all required and proposed fences and walls shall be constructed and installed for the required phase according to the approved plans on file in the Community Development Department Planning Division. (MC 9.080.070) (Advisory). |
P31. | (BP/CO) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all required landscaping and irrigation, including basins, shall be reviewed by the Community Development Department Planning Division. The landscaping shall be installed for the required phase in accordance with the Citys Landscape Standards the approved landscape plans, and conditions of approval included in the grading and building sections above. (Advisory) |
P32. | (CO) All rooftop equipment shall be appropriately screened and not visible from the Highway 60 right of way. |
P33. | Loading or unloading activities shall be conducted from the truck bays or designated loading areas only. (MC 9.10.140, CEQA) (Advisory) |
P34. | Three building phases are included under Tentative Parcel Map No. 35629, while a plot plan (PA07-0091) has been included for Phase 1. All development under Phases 2 and 3 (Parcels 2, 3 and 4) would require submittal of separate plot plans and review and approval from the Planning Commission. |
P35. | MM A-1 During project construction, the construction site manager or supervisor shall ensure that construction lighting shall be limited to lighting within the work area and light trespass shall be avoided though directional lighting, shielding, and other similar control measures. |
16 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
P36. | MM A-2. Enhanced architectural and landscaping treatment shall be utilized along the building frontage with State Route (SR) 60 to minimize or soften views of long expanses of the upper elevations of buildings. Examples of alternative treatment measures may include, but not be limited to the following: |
| Use of color; or |
| Texture variation; or |
| Roof line variation. |
P37. | MM AQ-1. Prior to construction of the project, the project applicant shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 by providing a Fugitive Dust Control Plan that describes the application of best management practices to control fugitive dust during construction. Best management practices shall include: |
| Application of water on disturbed soils a minimum of three times per day; | ||
| Covering haul vehicles; | ||
| Replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical; | ||
| Restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph; | ||
| Suspension of all grading activities during high wind speeds in excess of 25 mph. | ||
| A Large Operation notification shall be submitted to the SCAQMD prior to construction. | ||
| Project applicant to designate a person(s) to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary. | ||
| Post a sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The person shall take corrective action within 24 hours. | ||
| Complete all roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. as soon as possible; building pads should be developed as soon as possible after grading unless seeding, polymer, water, landscaping, soil binders, or similar means are applied within five working days after grading completion to minimize fugitive dust. | ||
| Street sweeping shall be accomplished as needed to remove soil transport to adjacent areas; sweeping shall require use of equipment certified under SCAQMD Rule 1186.1. |
P38. | MM AQ-2. The project applicant shall meet CARB standards by assuring use of lowest emission construction equipment reasonably available for use on |
17 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
this project. The construction fleet average shall meet or exceed Tier II level and the applicant shall provide incentives in the bidding process in selecting construction contractors that propose the lowest-emission construction equipment (i.e., high pressure injectors; smaller engine sizes; electric equipment; gasoline powered equipment with catalytic converters; and alternatively fueled construction equipment). |
The applicant shall also provide incentives in the bidding process in selecting grading and construction contractors that propose the use of equipment using Level III diesel particulate filters. |
P39. | MM AQ-3. During project construction, construction equipment shall be properly maintained in accordance with manufacturers specifications; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines. During maintenance, precautions shall be taken to ensure that fuel is not leaked onto the ground. Equipment maintenance records and equipment design specification data sheets shall be kept onsite during construction and subject to inspection by the SCAQMD. |
P40. | MM AQ-4. During project construction, the project applicant shall require all contractors to turn off all construction equipment and delivery vehicles when not in use or prohibit idling in excess of five (5) minutes. |
P41. | MM AQ-5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide a traffic control plan to the City of Moreno Valley that will describe in detail safe detours around the project construction site with temporary traffic control (e.g., flag person) during construction-related truck hauling activities, as required by the City. Construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system shall be minimized by scheduling such activities to off-peak hours. Construction truck travel shall be routed to minimize travel on congested streets and near to sensitive receptor areas. Construction traffic shall gain access to the project site via Theodore Street and Eucalyptus Avenue to the greatest extent possible to minimize traffic and dust along Redlands Boulevard. The traffic control plan is primarily intended as a safety measure but also can minimize traffic congestion and delays that increase idling and acceleration emissions. The traffic control plan shall be prepared in accordance with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highways Administration Rule on Work Zone Safety 23 CFR 630 Subpart J, Developing and Implementing Traffic Management Plans for Work Zones. |
18 |
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
P42.
|
MM AQ-6. All paints shall be low VOC paints and applied using either high volume low-pressure (HVLP) spray equipment or by hand application. For a list of low VOC paints, refer to the website www.aqmd.gov/prdas/brochures/paintguide.html. | |
|
||
P43.
|
MMAQ-7A. Construction Phases. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley indicating that construction workers will be encouraged to carpool to the greatest extent practical, including providing information on park and ride programs available to workers. The project shall also provide for lunch services onsite during construction to minimize the need for offsite vehicle trips. Workers shall be informed in writing and a letter placed on file at the City of Moreno Valley documenting the efforts to encourage carpooling. | |
|
||
P44.
|
MM AQ-7B. Occupancy. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the project applicant shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley indicating that tenant workers will be encouraged to carpool to the greatest extent practical including providing information on park and ride programs available to employees. Employees shall be informed in writing and a letter placed on file at the City of Moreno Valley documenting the efforts to encourage carpooling. | |
|
||
P45.
|
MM AQ-8. During project construction, onsite electrical hook-ups shall be provided for electric construction tools including saws, drills and compressors, to minimize the need for diesel powered electric generators. | |
|
||
P46.
|
MM AQ-9. During construction, rumble or bumper strips or similar best management practices shall be provided where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads, or wash off trucks or any equipment leaving the site with each trip. | |
|
||
P47.
|
MM-AQ-10. Offsite construction improvements shall be limited to an 8-hour day during daylight hours. | |
|
||
P48.
|
Operations- MM AQ-11. All project entrances shall be posted with signs which state: |
19
a) | Diesel trucks servicing the project shall not idle for more than 3 minutes; and | ||
b) | Telephone numbers of the building facilities manager and the California Air Resources Board to report violations. |
P49.
|
MM AQ-12. Electricity shall be provided in the loading dock areas for transportation refrigeration units visiting the site, if any. | |
|
||
P50.
|
MM AQ-13. A deed restricted area to the south of the project property line, precluding the establishment of sensitive receptors, is required. The. documents necessary to execute the deed restriction shall be submitted to the City of Moreno Valley prior to the issuance of a building permit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the area depicted on Exhibit 5.3-1 Proposed Buffer Area from the southern property line of the project between Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street shall be deed-restricted in a manner acceptable to the City of Moreno Valley to preclude the establishment of sensitive receptors including residences, hospitals, convalescent homes, day-care centers, and schools within this area. | |
|
||
P51.
|
MM AQ-14. Electrical hookups shall be provided for transport refrigeration units within the Commercial component (Phases II and III) to eliminate the need for idling of diesel-powered transport refrigeration units. | |
|
||
P52.
|
MM AQ-15. The project applicant shall include in all new lease documents the requirement that the tenants shall utilize only trucks using refrigeration units capable of utilizing electrical hook-ups for deliveries to the tenant. | |
|
||
P53.
|
MM AQ-16. The project applicant shall encourage its tenants to do the following: have a compressed workweek schedule for its employees; include electric powered and/or compressed natural gas fueled trucks and/or vehicles in fleets; require or provide incentives to use California Air Resources Board certified particulate filters that meet level III requirements; use clean trucks, such as 2007 or newer model year or 2010 compliant; use electric yard trucks; use trucks with a SmartWay 1.25 rating; and electrify auxiliary power units. The applicant shall provide documentation of its efforts to the satisfaction of the City. | |
|
||
P54.
|
MM AQ-17. The project shall be designed such that the check-in point for trucks is inside the facility property to ensure that there are no trucks queuing |
20
|
outside the facility. | |
|
||
P55.
|
MM AQ-18, Food services shall be provided onsite. | |
|
||
P56.
|
MM AQ-19. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits, written evidence shall be provided to the Planning and Transportation Engineering Divisions that the project applicant shall include in all new lease documents the requirement that the tenant shall provide employees with incentives for carpooling or impose a parking fee. | |
|
||
P57.
|
MM AQ-20. The property owners association shall maximize use of electrical equipment for landscape maintenance. | |
|
||
P58.
|
MM AQ-21. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 3, traffic signals, including interconnect hardware installed, or paid for, in whole or in part, by the project applicant shall be synchronized by the applicant, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. | |
|
||
P59.
|
MM BR-1. To avoid impacts to nesting birds covered under the MBTA, vegetation removal activities involving established perennial vegetation located in the urban/developed plant community shall be avoided during avian nesting season (February 15 through August 31). If the nesting season cannot be avoided, a nesting bird survey shall be provided no more than thirty (30) days prior to vegetation removal activities. If no active nests are observed, construction activity may proceed with no further monitoring. If active nests are observed, a biological monitor shall be present during any construction activity within the vicinity of the nest. Construction activity may encroach within the vicinity of the nesting birds at the discretion of the biological monitor. Construction activity may proceed once the nestlings have fledged the nest. | |
|
||
P60.
|
MM BR-2. (GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall pay the mandatory mitigation fee for the SKRHCP, The mitigation fee is a per/acre fee based on the entire property footprint and is used to purchase land that contains occupied Stephens kangaroo rat habitat for the purpose of conserving a large core population. |
21
P61.
|
MM BR-3. (GP) A pre-construction clearance survey for burrowing owl shall be provided. The pre-construction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than thirty (30) days prior to any grading or ground disturbing activities. | |
|
||
|
If construction is to be initiated during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) and burrowing owl is determined to occupy any portion of the study area during the 30-day pre-construction survey, consultation with the CDFG and USFWS shall take place and no construction activity shall take place within 500 feet of an active nest/burrow until it has been determined that the nest/burrow is no longer active, and all juveniles have fledged the nest/burrow. No disturbance to active burrows shall occur without appropriate permitting through the MBTA and/or CDFG. | |
|
||
|
If active burrowing owl burrows are detected outside the breeding season (September through January), or within the breeding season but owls are not nesting or in the process of nesting, passive relocation may be conducted following consultation with the CDFG and USFWS. Construction activity may occur within 500 feet of the active nests at the discretion of the biological monitor, | |
|
||
P62.
|
MM BR-4. (GP) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the mandatory mitigation fee for the MSHCP. The mitigation fee is a per unit fee based on the residential development and a per square feet fee based on commercial or industrial development. This will satisfy mitigation required for Impact 5.4-5 and 5.4-6. | |
|
||
P63.
|
MM CR-1. (GP) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a City-approved Project Archaeologist shall be retained to initiate and supervise cultural resource mitigation-monitoring during project-related earth moving in all areas of the project, subject to certain constraints found in MM CR-2. | |
|
||
P64.
|
MM CR-2. Project-related archaeological monitoring shall include the following constraints: |
1. | All construction-related earth moving shall be monitored to a depth of ten (10) feet below grade by the Project Archaeologist or his/her designated representative; |
22
2. | Once 50 percent of the earth to be moved has been examined by the Project Archaeologist, the Project Archaeologist may, at his or her discretion, terminate monitoring if and only if no buried cultural resources have been detected; | ||
3. | If buried cultural resources are detected during monitoring, monitoring must continue until 100 percent of virgin earth within the study area has been disturbed and inspected by the Project Archaeologist or his/her designated representative. | ||
4. | Grading shall cease in the area of a cultural artifact or potential cultural artifact as delineated by the Project Archaeologist or his/her designated representative. Grading should continue in other areas of the site while particular find are investigated; and | ||
5. | If cultural artifacts are uncovered during grading, they shall be examined by a professional archaeologist subject to MM CR-3, and decisions shall be made as to mitigation, treatment and/or disposition in consultation with the culturally affiliated Tribe(s), as determined by the City. A mitigation-monitoring report must accompany the artifacts. |
P65.
|
MM CR-3. Should buried prehistoric cultural resources be encountered during monitoring, the resources shall be evaluated for significance in consultation with the culturally affiliated Tribe(s), as determined by the City, following CEQA Guidelines prior to continuance of grading in the area. | |
|
||
P66.
|
MM CR-4. The City of Moreno Valley shall designate culturally affiliated Tribe(s) to monitor the project. Qualified representatives of the Tribal Group(s) shall be granted access to the project site to monitor all activities monitored by the Project Archaeologist. | |
|
||
P67.
|
MM CR-5. (GP) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a City-approved Project Paleontologist shall be retained to initiate and supervise paleontological mitigation-monitoring in all areas of the project, subject to certain constraints found below: |
1. | Once excavations reach ten (10) feet in depth, monitoring of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontologic resources by a |
23
qualified paleontologic monitor or his/her representative must take place. | |||
2. | Paleontological monitors shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. | ||
3. | Monitors shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens, and, | ||
4. | Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units described herein are not present, or, if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontologic personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. |
P68.
|
MM CR-6. Although considered unlikely, there is always the possibility that ground-disturbing activities may uncover previously unknown human remains. Should this occur, Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code applies, and the following procedures shall be followed. | |
|
In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, California Health & Safety Code 7050.5 and California Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project-related earthmoving begins and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken: |
1. | There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until a determination as to disposition and treatment is made. The Riverside County Coroner shall be contacted to determine if the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours to allow the NAHC to identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD may make recommendations and enter into consultation with the landowner, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in PRC Section 5097.98. |
24
P69.
|
The project will be subject to the Citys Grading Ordinance and all applicable California Building Codes. MM GEO-1. During excavation and grading activities a qualified engineering geologist shall observe the in-grading excavation to confirm the absence of any fault features within the building site. If any currently unknown fault features are observed, such features shall be evaluated by the geologist and, if determined necessary, remediation measures or other measures as appropriate shall be implemented to address such features in accordance with applicable City and State requirements. The geologists record of observations shall be summarized in a final report to be submitted to the City at the conclusion of excavation/grading activities. | |
|
||
P70.
|
MM HH-1. The fire protection system shall be designed per National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 13 to provide an Early Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) sprinkler system protection. Temperature rating of sprinkler heads to be per the Fire Departments requirements. | |
|
||
P71.
|
MM HH-2. A complete on-site fire protection underground system shall be provided per NFPA 24 and specific requirements of the local authorities. This system shall include hydrants, sectional valves, backflow prevention, and Fire Department connections. | |
|
||
P72.
|
MM HH-3. Riser assemblies shall include mechanical alarm valves. System control valves shall either be riser mounted with wall post extensions or exterior post indicator valves as required by the local authority. All required devices for central station alarm system interface shall be provided. | |
|
||
P73.
|
MM HH-4. System design, material, and installation shall comply with NFPA 13 and the other previous NFPA standards. It shall also comply with CBC and UFC standards. Approvals will also be obtained from the owners insurance authority. | |
|
||
P74.
|
MM LU-1. A deed restricted area to the south of the project property line, precluding the establishment of sensitive receptors, is required. The documents necessary to execute the deed restriction shall be submitted to the City of Moreno Valley prior to the issuance of a building permit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the area depicted on Exhibit 5.3-1 Proposed Buffer Area from the southern property line of the project between Redlands Boulevard and Theodore Street shall be deed-restricted in a manner |
25
|
acceptable to the City of Moreno Valley to preclude the establishment of sensitive receptors including residences, hospitals, convalescent homes, day-care centers, and schools within this area. (MM AQ-13) | |
|
||
P75.
|
MM N-1. No Construction Vehicles on Redlands Boulevard south of Future Eucalyptus Avenue. Other than construction vehicles necessary for identified offsite improvements within Redlands Boulevard, no construction vehicles shall be allowed in the vicinity of any residences on Redlands Boulevard south of existing Fir/future Eucalyptus Avenue. The prohibition for construction traffic shall apply to all phases of the proposed project. | |
|
||
*P76.
|
MM N-2. No nighttime grading or construction within 1,200 Feet of Residences south of Future Eucalyptus Avenue. City grading hours are from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday. No grading or construction activities shall occur at night (8 p.m. to 7 a.m.) within 1,200 feet from any noise-sensitive land uses (i.e. occupied residences including yard areas, schools, etc.) located south of SR-60 (Exhibit 5.11-6 shows the current location of occupied residences). Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall submit a Noise Reduction Compliance Plan (NRCP) to the City as part of the grading permit submittal showing the limits of nighttime construction based on the location of occupied residential dwellings and their associated parcels, and other noise sensitive uses. The limits of nighttime grading or construction shall be shown on the NRCP and grading plan submitted to the City. | |
|
||
|
The limits of construction allowed at night shall be staked or posted on site, and contractors will be provided with a copy of the plan showing the limits of nighttime construction. | |
|
||
|
In the event any new residential units or other noise sensitive land uses are built and occupied in the vicinity of the project site prior to completion of Phase 1 construction, nighttime construction and grading activities shall be prohibited within 1,200 feet of such residences. Compliance shall be demonstrated through a modification of the NRCP. | |
|
||
|
With the implementation of this mitigation measure, the loudest noise level that would be experienced at any developed residential parcel would be less than 55 dBA (Leq) during the nighttime, and this level would be consistent with the limits established in the Citys Noise Ordinance. Compliance with these standards during Phase 1 construction of the project should be assured |
26
|
through the Noise Reduction Compliance Plan (NRCP) and periodic monitoring of noise levels at developed residential parcels within 1,200 feet of the project site. | |
|
||
P77.
|
MM N-3. Daytime Construction Noise. City grading hours are from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday. If project site grading activities must occur within 560 feet of noise-sensitive land uses during the daytime (7 a.m. to 8 p.m.), then temporary sound barriers of sufficient height and density to reduce daytime noise levels to 60 dBA (Leq) or less shall be placed between the grading activities and the noise-sensitive land uses. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a NRCP to the City as part of the grading permit submittal showing the limits of daytime construction based on the 560 foot setback in relation to the location of occupied residential dwellings and their associated parcels and other noises sensitive uses. | |
|
||
|
In the event any new residential units or other noise sensitive land uses are built and occupied in the vicinity of the project site prior to completion of Phase 1 construction, the NRCP shall be modified to show a the revised new 560 foot setback for day time construction and grading activities in relation to the new residences. | |
|
||
|
With the implementation of this mitigation measure the loudest noise level that would be experienced at any developed residential parcel would be less than 60 dBA (Leq) during the daytime, and these levels would be consistent with the limits established in the Citys Noise Ordinance. Compliance with these standards during Phase 1 construction of the project should be assured through the NRCP and periodic monitoring of noise levels at developed residential parcels within 560 feet of the project site. This mitigation measure does not apply to off-site construction. | |
|
||
P78.
|
MM N-4. Require Equipment Maintenance. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good working order and fitted with the appropriate silencers, mufflers or acoustic covers where applicable. | |
|
||
P79.
|
MM N-5. Locate Material Stockpiles 1,200 Feet from Residences south of the Freeway. Material stockpiles shall be located at least 1,200 feet from residences south of future Eucalyptus Avenue along Theodore Street and Redlands Boulevard. Remotely locating the stockpiles reduces the noise at the residences from equipment traveling to and from the stockpiles and the |
27
|
noise that is sometimes associated with handling of material. | |
|
||
P80.
|
MM TT-1. (CO)Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 1, turn lanes shall be improved along Theodore Street at SR-60 and at Eucalyptus Avenue. In addition, minor pavement shall be added to the Eastbound and West bound State Route 60 Freeway ramp intersections with Theodore Street to accommodate truck turning movements. These proposed improvements should enhance safety and improve mobility between the freeway and Eucalyptus Avenue. | |
|
||
P81.
|
MM TT-2. Concurrent with the submittal of the plot plan for Phase 3 of the proposed project, the project applicant shall submit a supplemental traffic study assessing the projects contribution to the traffic impacts at the Redlands Boulevard intersection with SR-60 ramps, as well as Theodore Street at SR-60. Approval of the supplemental traffic study must occur prior to the approval of entitlements for the Phase 3 Plot Plan. The project applicant shall contribute to the costs of the interim intersection improvements required to provide adequate capacity for all phases of the project. Said contribution shall be on a fair-share basis considering the buildout of adjacent areas. Payment of such costs shall be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase 3. If the timing of Phase 3 of the project precedes the planned interim improvements, the project shall be required to construct interim improvements needed to provide adequate capacity to serve the project. | |
|
||
P82.
|
MM TT-3. The project applicant shall construct the easterly leg of the intersection located at Redlands Boulevard and Eucalyptus Avenue at the ultimate design required to provide adequate capacity for all phases of the project and buildout of the adjacent areas. The design tentatively consists of a dedicated westbound left turn lane, two westbound through lanes and a dedicated westbound right turn lane. Final geometries shall be determined after receiving the supplemental traffic study identified in MM TT 2. Construction of required improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for Phase 3 of the project. | |
|
||
P83.
|
MM TT(C)-1. (CO) Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for Phase 1 of the project, turn lanes shall be provided along Theodore Street at SR-60 and at Eucalyptus Avenue. In addition, minor pavement shall be added to the |
28
|
Eastbound and West bound State Route 60 Freeway ramp intersections with Theodore Street to accommodate truck turning movements These proposed improvements should enhance safety and improve mobility between the freeway and Eucalyptus Avenue. | |
|
||
P84.
|
MM TT(C)-2. The short-range analysis shows project impacts at the Redlands Boulevard interchange and at the Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Avenue intersection. At the interchange, improvements are planned and the project shall participate on a fair share basis if private funding is needed. If the timing of Phase 3 of the project precedes the planned interchange improvements, the project shall contribute to interim improvement to provide adequate capacity until the ultimate improvements are completed. These interim improvements include additions of left and right turn lanes at Redlands Boulevard, SR 60 Ramps, and Eucalyptus Avenue. The interim improvements would be the shared responsibility of the proposed project and cumulative projects. Fair share participation and/or contribution to interim improvements, as applicable, shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase 3 of the project | |
|
||
P85.
|
MM TT(C)-3. At the time of the submittal of the plot plan for Phase 3 of the proposed project, the applicant shall submit a supplemental traffic study assessing the projects contribution to the impacts at the Redlands Boulevard intersection with SR-60 ramps, as well as Theodore Street at SR-60. The developer shall contribute to the costs on a fair share basis of the intersection improvements required to provide adequate capacity for all phases of the project and buildout of the adjacent areas. If the timing of Phase 3 of the project precedes the planned improvements, the project shall be required to construct interim improvements to provide adequate capacity until the ultimate improvements are completed. | |
|
||
P86.
|
MM W-1. Prior to issuance of a Precise Grading Permit, Planting and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted for review and prior to the issuance of a building permit, approved by the City. Such plans shall contain the following components: |
| The plans shall incorporate water conservation principles as detailed in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code § 9.17.030 Landscape and irrigation design standards. |
29
| Plant types shall be grouped together according to their water, soil, sun and shade requirements and in relationship to the buildings. Plants with different water needs shall be irrigated separately. | ||
| Plans shall be designed in accordance with soil tests to determine appropriate specifications of soil amendments and to facilitate selection of water-efficient plant species suitable for the site. Soil amendments such as compost shall be provided to improve water-holding capacity of soil, where soil conditions warrant. | ||
| All exposed surfaces of non-turf areas within the developed landscape area shall be mulched with a minimum three inch (3) layer of material, except in areas with groundcover planted from flats where mulch depth shall be one and one half inches (1.5). | ||
| Turf areas shall be limited to public gathering areas and used in compliance with City approved water budget formula(s) and specifications. | ||
| All irrigation systems shall be designed to prevent runoff, over-spray, low head drainage (occurs where sprinkler systems are installed in sloped areas) and other similar conditions where water flows offsite on to adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, walk, roadways, or structures. Irrigation systems shall be designed, constructed, managed, and maintained to achieve as high an overall efficiency as possible. | ||
| Landscaped areas shall be provided with a) smart irrigation controllers which automatically adjusts the frequency and/or duration of irrigation events in response to changing weather conditions; b) rain-sensing devices to prevent irrigation during rainy weather; c) anti-drain check valves installed at strategic points to minimize or prevent low-head drainage; and d) pressure regulators when the static water pressure exceeds the maximum recommended operating pressure of the irrigation system. | ||
| The planting areas shall be grouped in relation to moisture control zones based on similarity of water requirements (i.e., turf separate from shrub and groundcover, full sun exposure areas separate from shade areas; top of slope separate from toe of slope). |
P87.
|
MM GCC-1. The project shall be designed to meet applicable 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency requirements, or any more stringent requirements that may be adopted prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. |
30
P88.
|
MM GCC-2. All buildings shall be designed with cool roofs using products certified by the Cool Roof Rating Council, and exposed roof surfaces shall use cool paints. | |
|
||
P89.
|
MM GCC-3. The project shall install a photovoltaic array (solar panels) or other source of renewable energy generation on-site, or otherwise acquire energy from the local utility that has been generated by renewable sources, to meet the projects Phase 1 office electricity needs. | |
|
||
P90.
|
MM GCC-4. The design and operation of the project shall use ENERGY STAR-qualified energy efficient products for heating and cooling systems, and for built-in appliances and lighting. | |
|
||
P91.
|
MM GCC-5. To reduce vehicle miles traveled and emissions associated with trucks and vehicles, the following measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Building Official and Transportation Division Manager: |
a) | Onsite secure, weather-protected bicycle storage parking shall be provided. Onsite showers (one for males and one for females) and lockers for employees shall be provided in each building. Onsite convenient bicycle parking shall be provided for retail customers. | ||
b) | Any traffic lights installed as part of this project shall use Light Emitting Diodes. | ||
c) | Pedestrian and bicycle connections shall be provided to surrounding areas consistent with the Existing General Plan. | ||
d) | A Transportation Management Association (TMA) shall be established for the project by the applicant. The TMA shall coordinate its efforts with other TMAs in the City and encourage and coordinate carpooling by occupants of the project. The TMA shall advertise its services to the building occupants. The TMA shall offer transit or other incentives to the employees to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A shuttle shall be provided during any one hour period where the number of employees using public transit exceeds 20 during the period. The TMA shall distribute public transportation information to its employees. The TMA shall provide electronic message board space for coordinating rides. |
31
Within two months after project completion, the TMA shall submit a plan to the City that outlines the measures the TMA has implemented and contact information. | |||
e) | There shall be preferential parking for carpools, vanpools, and alternatively fueled vehicles. |
P92.
|
MM GCC-6. The project shall provide a minimum of two electric vehicle-charging stations. | |
|
||
P93.
|
MM GCC-7. During onsite construction phases of mass grading, fine grading, and building (excluding asphalt paving, trenching, and offsite improvements), off-road construction equipment shall use biodiesel fuel (a minimum of B20, or 20 percent of biodiesel). Construction equipment exempt from this measure include those with warranties that would be voided if B20 biodiesel fuel is used. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide documentation to the City that verifies that certain equipment are exempt; that a biodiesel supply has been secured; and that the construction contractor is aware that the use of biodiesel is required. | |
|
||
P94.
|
MM GCC-8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project shall have in place a City-approved Solid Waste Diversion and Recycling Plan that demonstrates the diversion and recycling of all salvageable and re-useable wood, metal, plastic and paper products used during project construction. A similar Plan shall be in place prior to occupancy that demonstrates the diversion and recycling of all wood, metal, plastic and paper products during on-going operation of the warehouse and office portions of the project. The Plans shall include the name of the waste hauler, their assumed destination for all waste and recycled materials, and the procedures that will be followed to ensure implementation of this measure. | |
|
||
P95.
|
MM GCC-9. The project shall be certifiable under Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). The project shall obtain the following credits from the LEED for New Construction & Major Renovations, version 2.2 (or equivalent): Sustainable Sites Credit 7.1: Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof; LEED Energy & Atmosphere Credit 1, Optimize Energy Performance, in part through installing skylights and utilizing energy efficient lighting. Demonstration of |
32
|
certifiability shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City, prior to the issuance of building permits. | |
|
||
P96.
|
MM GCC-10. The project shall be designed to accommodate trucks utilizing SmartWay Truck Efficiency emission reduction features. Trailer tails (extenders) are incompatible with loading docks and are exempt from this measure. | |
|
||
P97.
|
MM GCC-11. Every truck that enters the site with a gross vehicle weight rating over 10,000 pounds shall have an Engine Certification Label. If it does not have the label, it shall be prohibited from entering the project site. |
B1.
|
The above project shall comply with the current California Codes (CBC, CEC, CMC and the CPC) as well as all other city ordinances. All new projects shall provide a soils report. Plans shall be submitted to the Building Department as a separate submittal. | |
|
||
|
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS INCLUDING CONDOMINIUMS, TOWNHOMES, DUPLEXES AND TRIPLEX BUILDINGS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING. | |
|
||
|
Prior to final inspection, all plans will be placed on a CD Rom for reference and verification. Plans will include as built plans, revisions and changes. The CD will also include Title 24 energy calculations, structural calculations and all other pertinent information. It will be the responsibility of the developer and or the building or property owner(s) to bear all costs required for this process. The CD will be presented to the Building Department for review prior to final inspection and building occupancy. The CD will become the property of the Moreno Valley Building Department at that time. In addition, a site plan showing the path of travel from public right of way and building to building access with elevations will be required. (Advisory) | |
|
||
B2.
|
(BP) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a properly completed Waste Management Plan (WMP), as required, to the Compliance Official (Building Official) as a portion of the building or demolition permit process. (Advisory) |
33
S1.
|
(BP) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide to the Community Development Director a written certification by the affected school district that either: (1) the project has complied with the fee or other exaction levied on the project by the governing board of the district, pursuant to Government Code Section 65996; or (2) the fee or other requirement does not apply to the project. (Advisory) |
PO1.
|
(BP) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. (Advisory) |
34
COMMENTS PLOT PLAN
Case No: PA07-0088 through PA07-0091 and P07-157
APN: 488-350-001 through 002 and 488-360-001 through 012
DATE: 12/19/08
F4.
F5.
F6.
F7.
F8.
F9.
F10.
35
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
F11. |
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets which have not been
completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC
503.2.5. and MVMC 8.36.050) (ADVISORY)
|
|
|
||
F12. |
Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant/developer shall participate in the Fire
Impact Mitigation Program. (Fee Resolution as adopted by City Council)
|
|
|
||
F13. |
Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the
water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review. Plans shall:
|
a) | Be signed by a registered civil engineer or a certified fire protection engineer; | ||
b) | Contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and | ||
c) | Conform to hydrant type, location, spacing of new and existing hydrants and minimum fire flow required as determined by the Fire Prevention Bureau. |
After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall
be installed, made serviceable, and be accepted by the Moreno Valley Fire Department prior
to Certificate of occupancy. They shall be maintained accessible. The interim Fire Master
Plan (invasion line) will provide temporary fire protection during construction.
|
||
|
||
Existing fire hydrants on public streets are allowed to be considered available. Existing
fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be considered
available unless fire
apparatus access roads extend between properties and easements are established to prevent
obstruction of such roads. (CFC 508.1 and MVMC 8.36.100) (ADVISORY)
|
||
|
||
F14. |
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, Blue Reflective Markers
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations in accordance with City
specifications. (CFC 510.1) (ADVISORY)
|
|
|
||
F15. |
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, all
commercial
buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side and
rear access locations. The numerals shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height for
buildings and six (6) inches in height for suite identification on a contrasting background.
Unobstructed lighting of the address(s) shall be by means approved by the Fire Prevention
Bureau and Police Department. In multiple suite centers (strip malls), businesses shall post
the name of the business on the rear door(s). (CFC 505.1) (ADVISORY)
|
|
|
||
F16. |
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, the applicant/developer
shall install a fire sprinkler system based on square footage and type of construction,
occupancy or use. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Chapter 9) (ADVISORY)
|
36 |
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
F17.
F18.
F19.
F20.
F21.
F22.
F23.
F24.
37
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
system installation. Submittals shall be in accordance with CFC Chapter 9 and associated
accepted national standards. (ADVISORY)
|
||
|
||
F25. |
A permit is required to maintain, store, use or handle materials, or to conduct processes
which, produce conditions hazardous to life or property, or to install equipment used in
connection with such activities. Such permits shall not be construed as authority to violate,
cancel or set aside any of the provisions of this code. Such permit shall not take the place
of any license required by law. Applications for permits shall be made to the Fire
Prevention Bureau in such form and detail as prescribed by the Bureau. Applications for
permits shall be accompanied by such plans as required by the Bureau. Permits shall be kept
on the premises designated therein at all times and shall be posted in a conspicuous location on the premises or shall be kept on the premises in a location designated by the
Fire Chief. Permits shall be subject to inspection at all times by an officer of the fire
department or other persons authorized by the Fire Chief in accordance with Appendix Chapter
1 and MVMC 8.36.100. (ADVISORY)
|
|
|
||
F26. |
Approval of the safety precautions required for buildings being constructed, altered or
demolished shall be required by the Fire Chief in addition to other approvals required for
specific operations or processes associated with such construction, alteration or demolition.
(CFC Chapter 14) (ADVISORY)
|
|
|
||
F27. |
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, permits are required to store, dispense, use
or handle hazardous material. Each application for a permit shall include a hazardous
materials management plan (HMMP). The location of the HMMP shall be posted adjacent to
(other) permits when an HMMP is provided. The HMMP shall include a facility site plan
designating the following:
|
a) | Storage and use areas; | ||
b) | Maximum amount of each material stored or used in each area; | ||
c) | Range of container sizes; | ||
d) | Locations of emergency isolation and mitigation valves and devises; | ||
e) | Product conveying piping containing liquids or gases, other than utility-owned fuel gas lines and low-pressure fuel gas lines; | ||
f) | On and off positions of valves for valves which are of the self-indicating type; | ||
g) | Storage plan showing the intended storage arrangement, including the location and dimensions of aisles. The plans shall be legible and approximately to scale. Separate distribution systems are allowed to be shown on separate pages; and h) Site plan showing all adjacent/neighboring structures and use. | ||
h) | Site plan showing all adjacent/neighboring structures and use. |
NOTE: Each application for a permit shall include a hazardous materials inventory
statement (HMIS). (ADVISORY)
|
||
|
||
F28. |
Before a Hazardous Materials permit is issued, the Fire Chief shall inspect and approve the
receptacles, vehicles, buildings, devices, premises, storage spaces or areas to be used. In
instances where laws or regulations are enforceable by departments other than the Fire
Prevention Bureau, joint approval shall be obtained from all departments concerned. (CFC
Appendix H) (ADVISORY)
|
38 |
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
F29.
F30.
F31.
F32.
F33.
F34.
F35.
F36.
39
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
LD1. |
(G) The developer shall comply with all applicable City ordinances and resolutions including
the Citys Municipal Code (MC) and if subdividing land, the Government Code (GC) of the State
of California, specifically Sections 66410 through 66499.58, said sections also referred to
as the Subdivision Map Act (SMA). (MC 9.14.010) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD2. |
(G) If the project involves the subdivision of land, maps may be developed in phases with the
approval of the City Engineer. Financial security shall be provided for all improvements
associated with each phase of the map. The boundaries of any multiple map increment shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The City Engineer may require the dedication and
construction of necessary utilities, streets or other improvements outside the area of any
particular map, if the improvements are needed for circulation, parking, access, or for the
welfare or safety of the public. (MC 9.14.080, GC 66412 and 66462.5) if the project does not
involve the subdivision of land and it is necessary to dedicate right-of-way/easements, the
developer shall make the appropriate offer of dedication by separate instrument. The City
Engineer may require the construction of necessary utilities, streets or other improvements
beyond the project boundary, if the improvements are needed for circulation, parking, access,
or for the welfare or safety of the public. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD3. |
(G) It is understood that the plot plan correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and that their omission may require the map or plans associated
with this application to be resubmitted for further consideration. (MC 9.14.040) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD4. |
(G) In the event right-of-way or offsite easements are required to construct offsite
improvements necessary for the orderly development of the surrounding
|
40 |
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
LD5.
LD6.
a.
Removal of dirt, debris, or other construction material deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day.
b.
Observance of working hours as stipulated on permits issued by the Public Works Department.
c.
The construction site shall accommodate the parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the
site.
d.
All dust control measures per South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements shall be adhered to during the grading operations.
LD7.
41
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
LD8. |
(G) Public drainage easements, when required, shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide and
shall be shown on the map and plan, and noted as follows: Drainage Easement no
structures, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed. In addition, the
grade within the easement area shall not exceed a 3:1 (H:V) slope, unless approved by the
City Engineer. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD9. |
(G) A detailed drainage study shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and
approval at the time of any improvement or grading plan submittal. The study shall be
prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall include existing
and proposed hydrologic
conditions. Hydraulic calculations are required for all drainage control devices and storm
drain lines. (MC 9.14.110) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD10. |
(G) The final conditions of approval issued by the Planning Division subsequent to Planning
Commission approval shall be photographically or electronically placed on mylar sheets and
included in the Grading and Street Improvement plan sets on twenty-four (24) inch by
thirty-six (36) inch mylar and submitted with the plans for plan check. These conditions of
approval shall become part of these plan sets and the approved plans shall be available in
the field during grading and construction. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD11. |
(G) Upon approval of the plot plan by the Planning Commission, the Developer shall submit
the approved plot plan on compact disk in (.dxf) digital format to the Land Development
Division of the Public Works Department. (Advisory)
|
LD12. |
(GPA) The grading plans, plans shall be drawn on twenty-four (24) inch by thirty-six (36)
inch mylar and signed by a registered civil engineer and other registered/licensed
professional as required. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD13. |
(GPA) Grading plans shall comply with the City Grading ordinance, these Conditions of
Approval and the following criteria:
|
a. | The project street and lot grading shall be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area and outlet points. Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, lot lines shall be located at the top of slopes. | ||
b. | Any grading that creates cut or fill slopes adjacent to the street shall provide erosion control, sight distance control, and slope easements as approved by the City Engineer. | ||
c. | A grading permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department Land Development Division prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City maintained road right-of-way. | ||
d. | All improvement plans are substantially complete and appropriate clearance and at-risk letters are provided to the City, (MC 9.14.030) |
42 |
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
e. | The developer shall submit a soils and geologic report to the Public Works Department Land Development Division. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. (Advisory) |
LD14. |
(GPA) Prior to grading plan approval, the developer shall select treatment
control best management practices (BMPs) that are medium to highly effective for
treating Pollutants of Concern (POC) for the project. Projects where National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) mandates water quality treatment
control best management practices (BMPs) shall be designed per the City of Moreno
Valley guidelines or as approved by the City Engineer. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD15. |
(GPA, IP) Prior to approval of the grading plans or improvement plans for
project sites which are one acre or larger, the developer shall obtain the WQMP
number from the Citys Land Development Division, if a WQMP is required, and as a
condition of the State Water Quality Control Board, a Notice of Intent (NOI) for
an NPDES permit must be filed and a Waste Discharge Identification (W.D.I.D.)
permit number obtained from the State Water Quality Control Board. (Clean Water
Act) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD16. |
(GPA) Prior to the rough grading plan approval, or issuance of a building
permit, if a grading permit is not required, the Developer shall:
|
a. | Submit two (2) copies of the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for review by the City Engineer that: |
i. | Addresses Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizes directly connected impervious areas to the Citys street and storm drain systems, and conserves natural areas; | ||
ii. | Incorporates Source Control BMPs and provides a detailed description of their implementation; | ||
iii. | Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs and provides information regarding design considerations; | ||
iv. | Describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs requiring maintenance; and | ||
v. | Describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the BMPs. |
A copy of the final WQMP template can be obtained on the Citys Website or by
contacting the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department.
|
b. | Record a Stormwater Treatment Device and Control Measure Access and Maintenance Covenant, to provide public notice of the requirement to implement the approved final project-specific WQMP and the |
43 |
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
maintenance requirements associated with the WQMP. A boilerplate copy of the Stormwater Treatment Device and Control Measure Access and Maintenance Covenant, can be obtained by contacting the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department. (Advisory) |
LD17. |
(GPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, or issuance of a building
permit, if a grading permit is not required, the Developer shall secure
approval of the final project-specific WQMP from the City Engineer.
(Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD18. |
(GPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, or issuance of a building
permit as determined by the City Engineer, the approved final
project-specific WQMP shall be incorporated by reference or attached to the
projects Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as the Post-Construction
Management Plan. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD19. |
(GPA) Prior to grading permit issuance, the developer shall prepare a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in conformance with the
states Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit. A copy of the
current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review
upon request. The SWPPP shall be submitted to the Citys Storm Water
Program Manager on compact disk(s) in Microsoft Word format. The developer
is required to bring the SWPPP to the grading pre-construction meeting.
(Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD20. |
(GPA) Prior to the approval of the grading plans, the developer shall pay
any applicable remaining grading plan check fee. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD21. |
(GPA/MA) Prior to the later of either grading plan or final map approval,
resolution of all drainage issues shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
(Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD22. |
(GP) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall
submit a letter of permission to grade for a specific duration recorded
against each offsite parcel and an easement for slope purposes at final map
recordation. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD23. |
(GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, if the fee has not already
been paid prior to map approval or prior to issuance of a building permit if
a grading permit is not required, the developer shall pay Area Drainage Plan
(ADP) fees. The developer shall provide a receipt to the City showing that
ADP fees have been paid to Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District. (MC 9.14.100)
|
|
|
||
LD24. |
(GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the following securities
shall be submitted to the City:
|
a. | Security, in the form of a cash deposit (preferable), letter of credit, or performance bond shall be required to be submitted as a guarantee |
44 |
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
of the completion of the grading required as a condition of
approval of the project (MC 8.21.070)
|
||
|
||
b. |
Erosion control security as a guarantee of
the completion and maintenance of the erosion control
systems required as a condition of approval of the project.
The amount of the security shall be equal to one hundred
(100) percent of the total estimated cost of the erosion
control system(s). The permittees estimate of such cost
shall be based on the established unit costs available form
the city and shall be subject to the review and approval of
the city engineer. At least twenty-five (25) percent of the
required security shall be in cash and shall be deposited
with the city engineer. The remainder of the erosion control
security shall be subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and City Attorney, and consist of one or more of
the following:
|
i. |
Cash deposit;
|
|
ii. |
Bond
|
|
iii. |
Certificate of Deposit
|
|
iv. |
Letter of Credit, in City format, from one or more local
financial institution(s) subject to regulation by the state or federal
government. (MC 8.21.150) (Advisory)
|
LD25. |
(GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall pay the
applicable grading inspection fees. (Advisory)
|
LD26. |
(IPA) Improvement plans shall be drawn on twenty-four (24) inch by
thirty-six (36) inch mylar and signed by a registered civil engineer and
other registered/licensed professional as required. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD27. |
(IPA) Prior to approval of the improvement plans, the developer shall
submit clearances from all applicable agencies, and pay all outstanding
plan check fees. (MC 9.14.210) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD28. |
(IPA) All public improvement plans prepared and signed by a registered
civil engineer in accordance with City standards, policies and requirements
shall be approved by the City Engineer. Securities and a public improvement
agreement shall be required to be submitted and executed as a guarantee of
the completion of the improvements. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD29. |
(IPA) The street improvement plans shall comply with all applicable City
standards and the following design standards throughout this project:
|
a. |
Corner cutbacks in conformance with City Standard 208
shall be shown on the final map or, if no map is to be recorded,
offered for dedication by separate instrument.
|
|
45 | Resolution No. 2009 -11 | ||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
b. |
Lot access to major thoroughfares shall be restricted except at
intersections and approved entrances and shall be so noted on the final
map. (MC 9.14.100)
|
|
|
||
c. |
The minimum centerline and flow line grades shall be one percent unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (MC 9.14.020)
|
|
|
||
d. |
All street intersections shall be at ninety (90) degrees plus or minus
five (5) degrees or as approved by the City Engineer per City Standard No.
706A. (MC 9.14.020)
|
|
|
||
e. |
All reverse curves shall include a minimum tangent of one hundred (100)
feet in length.
(Advisory)
|
LD30. |
(IPA) Improvement plans, including design plan and profile information, shall be based upon
a centerline profile, extending beyond the project boundaries approved by the City Engineer.
Design plan and profile information shall include the minimum 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD31. |
(IPA) Improvement plans, shall reflect the Citys moratorium on trench repair pavement cuts
on any streets less than three years old or on slurry sealed streets less than one year old
unless specifically approved by the City Engineer. Pavement cuts for trench repairs may be
allowed for emergency repairs or as specifically approved by the City Engineer. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD32. |
(IPA) Drainage facilities with sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary
100-year storm flows. Secondary emergency escape shall also be provided. (MC 9.14.110)
(Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD33. |
(IPA) If the projects hydrology study proposes to use any portion of a public street
right-of-way to accommodate storm flows, said study shall show that the 10-year storm flow
will be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm flow will be contained within the
street right-of-way. On major streets (Minor Arterial or larger), at least one lane in each
direction shall remain open and not be used to carry surface flows. When any of these
criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities shall be installed as approved by the
Public Works Department Land Development Division. (MC 9.14.110) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD34. |
(IPA) The project shall be designed to accept and properly convey all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site. All storm drain design and improvements shall be subject to
review and approval of the City Engineer. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD35. |
(CP) All work performed within the City right-of-way requires a construction permit. As
determined by the City Engineer, security may be required for work within the right-of-way.
Security shall be in the form of a cash deposit or other approved means. The City Engineer may
require the execution of a public improvement agreement as a condition of the issuance of the
construction
|
|
46 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | ||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
permit. All inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of construction permit.
(MC 9.14.100) (Advisory)
|
||
|
||
LD36. |
(CP) Prior to issuance of a construction permit, all public improvement plans
prepared and signed by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City standards,
policies and requirements shall be approved by the City Engineer. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD37. |
(CP) Prior to issuance of construction permits, the developer shall submit all improvement
plans on compact disks, in (.dxf) digital format to the Land Development Division of the
Public Works Department. (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD38. |
(CP) Prior to issuance of construction permits, the developer shall pay all applicable
inspection fees. (Advisory)
|
LD39. |
(BP) The developer shall coordinate with Land Development staff to facilitate partial pad
certification in conjunction with construction sequencing as approved by the City Engineer.
(Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD40. |
(BP) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit for review and
approval, a Waste Management Plan (WMP) per City code and Land Development Division
requirements. (AB939, MC 8.80) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD41. |
(BP) Prior to issuance of a building permit, Parcel Map 35629 shall record.
|
LD42. |
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final, the developer shall
pay all outstanding fees.
|
|
|
||
LD43. |
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final, the developer shall
construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards, unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following
applicable improvements:
|
a. |
Street improvements including, but not limited to: pavement, base, curb
and/or gutter, cross gutters, spandrel, sidewalks, drive approaches,
pedestrian ramps, street lights, signing, striping, under sidewalk drains,
landscaping and irrigation, medians, redwood header boards, pavement
tapers/transitions and traffic control devices as appropriate.
|
|
|
||
b. |
Storm drain facilities including, but not limited to: storm drain pipe,
storm drain laterals, open channels, catch basins and local depressions.
|
|
|
||
c. |
City-owned utilities.
|
|
47 | Resolution No. 2009 -11 | ||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
d. |
Sewer and water systems including, but not limited to: sanitary
sewer, potable water and recycled water.
|
|
|
||
e. |
Under grounding of existing and proposed utility lines less
than 115,000 volts.
|
|
|
||
f. |
Relocation of overhead electrical utility lines including,
but not limited to: electrical, cable and telephone.
|
|
(Advisory)
|
LD44. |
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final,
all existing and new utilities adjacent to and on-site shall be placed
underground in accordance with City of Moreno Valley ordinances.
(MC 9.14.130) (Advisory)
|
|
|
||
LD45. |
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final,
the Developer must comply with the following:
|
a. |
Any required water quality basins, associated treatment
control BMPs, and associated hardware per the approved civil drawing must
be constructed, certified and approved by the City Engineer including,
but not limited to, piping, forebay, aftbay, trash rack.
|
|
|
||
b. |
An Engineers Line and Grade Certification shall be provided to the City.
|
|
|
||
c. |
Said facilities shall pass a flow test per City test
procedures.
|
|
(Advisory)
|
LD46. |
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building final
for any Commercial/Industrial facility, whichever occurs first, the owner
may have to secure coverage under the States General Industrial Activities
Storm Water Permit as issued by the State Water Resources Control Board.
(Advisory)
|
LD47. |
(AOS) Aggregate slurry, per Section 203-5 of Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction, may be required just prior to acceptance
street(s) into the City maintained road system at the discretion of the
City Engineer. (Advisory)
|
LD48. |
(RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan approval, the developer shall obtain
written concurrence from Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) for any proposed modifications to the
|
|
48 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | ||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
Moreno Area Drainage Plan as well as for the acceptance of a small new
additional tributary area resulting from the projects proposed grading.
(RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan
approval, it shall be clearly demonstrated on
the final drainage study that the potential
increased rate of runoff resulting from the
development of this site is mitigated. During
identified storm events peak flow rates and
velocity leaving the site in the developed
condition shall be no larger than that of the
pre-developed condition. The following shall be
analyzed in the final drainage study: 1, 3, 6
and 24-hour storm duration for the 2, 5, 10 and
100-year storm events. The applicant
understands that additional detention measures
or other mitigation, beyond those shown on the
tentative parcel map and preliminary drainage
study, may be required and shall include those
into the design and construction of appropriate
drainage facilities.
(RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan
approval, emergency overflow areas shall be
shown at all applicable drainage improvement
locations in the event that the drainage
improvement fails or exceeds full capacity.
Emergency overflow area elevations shall be a
minimum of 1 below the proposed building pad
elevation in close proximity. This may include,
but not be limited to, an emergency spillway in
the basin and an emergency overflow at any sump
catch basin location. The developer is
responsible for securing any necessary on-site
or off-site drainage easements as required for
emergency overflow.
(RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan
approval, all easements, existing, proposed,
temporary, and those to be quitclaimed shall be
shown on the plan complete with type of
easement, easement width, as applicable,
instrument number and date of recordation.
Copies of the existing easement documents shall
be submitted to the City (upon request) for
review. Those easements to be quitclaimed shall
be coordinated with the appropriate easement
holder, including but not limited to, those
associated with the electrical utility lines
traversing Parcel 1 and the water line running
along the entire maps north boundary adjacent
to SR-60 and its on-/off-ramps, as shown and
labeled on the tentative parcel map. The above
referenced water line shall be relocated
outside the existing and ultimate SR-60
right-of-way and preferably within Eucalyptus
Avenue.
(RGPA) Not withstanding what is shown on
the tentative parcel map and grading plan, no
grading on Caltrans property shall be permitted
without an encroachment permit.
(RGPA) Prior to rough grading plan
approval, the plan shall show a minimum 15-foot
wide maintenance access road from a public
street to all graded areas resulting from the
grading associated with the project.
(PGPA) Prior to precise grading plan
approval, the precise grading plan shall be
consistent with the rough grading plan and
approved plot plan, in terms of, but not
limited to, pad and grade elevations, proposed
water quality treatment control best
management practices and locations
49
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
|
including detention and infiltration basins, proposed building, parking lot, landscape area, slope, and project entrance locations. (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD55.
|
(PGPA) Prior to precise grading plan or improvement plan approval, as applicable, the plans shall show any driveway approach up to 40 in width to be constructed per City Standard Plan 118C, Option 2, modified. The driveways shall have a minimum radius of 50 if the entrance is to accommodate truck traffic, 35 otherwise, and transition from an 8 curb height to a 0 curb height at the conventional right-of-way 12 behind the curb line, or as approved by the City Engineer. There shall be a 4-foot wide pedestrian sidewalk area at 2% maximum cross slope behind the conventional right-of-way. A 4-foot pedestrian right-of-way dedication shall be made on PM 35629. Any entrance greater than 40 in width shall be designed as a street intersection. (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD56.
|
(IPA) If it is necessary to adjust the boundary of Parcel G, 5, and 6 (Parcels 5 and 6 to be designated as lettered parcels on the final parcel map) resulting in the need for additional right-of-way for highway and road purposes, it shall be dedicated to the City at no cost to the City. If it is necessary to adjust the boundary resulting in excess right-of-way not needed for highway and road purposes, the City and the developer shall pursue the appropriate mechanism to transfer or convey public property back to the developer. | |
|
||
LD57.
|
(IPA) Prior to improvement plan approval, the plans shall show redwood headers, or other pavement edge treatment as approved by the City Engineer, at all edge-of-pavement locations in the public right-of-way. If redwood header board is approved, the redwood header shall be installed per the City Standard, using a nominal minimum of 2 wide by 6 deep board. This shall include, but not be limited to, the following locations: |
|
a. | Along the frontage of Parcels 1, 2 and 4 of PM 35629, south side of Eucalyptus Avenue, south edge of the east bound travel lane to be constructed in Phase 1. |
LD58.
|
(IPA) Storm drain improvement plans shall show the connection of the proposed private storm drain system to the proposed public storm drain system at the public street right-of-way. A storm drain manhole shall be placed at the right-of-way to mark the beginning of the publicly maintained portion of this storm drain. | |
|
||
LD59.
|
(IP) Prior to commencing any work within Caltrans right-of-way, the developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans. Work within Caltrans right-of-way may include that work associated with storm drain connections to existing freeway culverts, water line removal, water line extension from north of the freeway including jack and bore operation, power pole relocation and/or undergrounding, and any grading. | |
|
||
LD60.
|
(IP) Prior to approval of improvement plans, the developer shall secure any off-site easements from the off-site property owner(s). This includes |
50 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | |||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
but is not limited to the drainage easement for the proposed spreading
basin south of the project, the slope easement along the south side of
Eucalyptus Avenue, the drainage easement for the culvert outlet across
Eucalyptus Avenue near Theodore Street, the utility easement for the
temporary overhead electrical lines, and any others that may be necessary
for the construction and maintenance of off site utility and
infrastructure improvements.
(BP) Prior to issuance of a building permit, final line and grade
certification shall be provided by the licensed engineer of record stating
the building pad is in substantial conformance with the approved grading
plan. For Parcel 1, the developer shall coordinate with Land Development
staff to facilitate partial pad certification in conjunction with
construction sequencing as approved by the City Engineer. The relocation
and/or abandonment of existing utilities and quitclaim of existing easements
shall be coordinated with the sequencing of the Parcel 1 development such
that these do not interfere or encumber the particular building area being
developed at any given time.
(BP) Prior to building permit issuance this project shall cause the
quitclaim of all existing easements, especially those easements underneath
proposed building footprints shall be quitclaimed. This shall include, but
not be limited to, the water line easement and power line easement. All
utilities shall be relocated, as necessary, prior to quitclaiming the
easements. All new easements shall be granted prior to utility relocations
and quitclaims of existing easements.
(BP) Prior to building permit issuance,
the developer shall remove, or cause the
removal, of any sign or other structure, as
applicable, on the project site, including that
portion within Parcels G, 5 and 6, as shown on the tentative parcel map (Parcels 5 and 6 to be
dedicated as lettered parcels on the final
parcel map), to be dedicated to the City for
the future freeway expansion, unless other
arrangements are made with and approved by the
City Engineer. The developer shall record
easements for, provide access to, etc. any sign
or structure that might remain, as approved by
the City Engineer.
(BP) Prior to building permit issuance,
the developer shall submit to the City a
recorded agreement pertaining to the
maintenance of and access to the temporary
spreading basin to be constructed on the land
south and adjacent to this project map,
identified as APN# 488-350-002.
(BP) Prior to building permit issuance of
the proposed building in Phase 1, the developer
shall submit to the City for review and
approval all required off-site (outside of the
map boundary) easements, including but not
limited to, a roadway slope easement along the
south side of Eucalyptus Avenue, drainage
easements at low points along the south side of
Eucalyptus Avenue where rip rap and other
drainage improvements are proposed, a drainage
easement for the culvert headwall, rip rap and
grading on the south side of Eucalyptus Avenue,
51
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
just west of Theodore Street, an easement for any work outside of the
Sinclair Street right-of-way north of SR-60 for work associated with the
construction of the water line. These easements shall record prior to
occupancy, after the City has reviewed and approved them prior to
building permit issuance.
(BP) Prior to issuance of a building permit, PM 35629 shall record along
with all the offers of dedication for right-of-way and easements made on
the map. Alternatively, offers of dedication for right-of-way and easements
may record by separate instrument.
(CO) Prior to occupancy for the proposed building in Phase 1, the
developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans and complete
the following jack and bore operation for the installation of a proposed
water line underneath SR-60 to be located within Sinclair Street
right-of-way north of the freeway. The developer shall apply Caltrans
crossing requirements to the portion of the water line that will lie within
Parcel G of the tentative parcel map.
(CO) Prior to occupancy of the proposed
building in Phase 1, all overhead utility lines
less than 115,000 volts fronting or within the
entire map boundary shall be placed underground
per Section 9.14.030C of the City Municipal
Code except those along the west side of
Theodore Street, the terminus of the facility
over SR-60 at Sinclair Street, and the interim
service from Redlands Boulevard and Dracaea
Avenue northerly to the project site.
(CO) Prior to occupancy of the proposed
building in Phase 1, existing utilities shall
be relocated outside of Parcels G, 5, and 6, as
identified on the tentative parcel map (Parcels
5 and 6 to be dedicated as lettered lots on the
final parcel map), being offered for dedication
for highway and road purposes.
(CO) Prior to occupancy of the proposed
building in Phase 1, the developer shall bring
overhead electrical service to the building
from the nearest source identified by the
developer to be located on the west side of
Redlands Boulevard near Dracaea Avenue. This
will require the developer to bore under
Redlands Boulevard to the east side of Redlands
Boulevard.
(RGPA) In accordance with the City of
Moreno Valley standards, the Double Ring
Infiltrometer field testing method per ASTM
D3385 shall be utilized to perform in-situ
percolation testing in the location of proposed
infiltration area treatment control Best
Management Practice (BMP) and the results
included as an amendment to the Final WQMP
prior to issuance of the first occupancy.
(Advisory)
(RGPA) The Applicant shall prepare and
submit for approval a Project Specific Final
Water Quality Management Plan
(F-WQMP) for
PA07-0090
52
Resolution No. 2009-11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
|
Highlands Parcel 1 of TPM 35629 Logistics Building. The F-WQMP shall be consistent with the approved P-WQMP and in full conformance with the document; Riverside County Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff dated July 24, 2006. The F-WQMP shall be submitted and approved prior to rough grading plan approval. At a minimum, the F-WQMP shall include the following: Site Design BMPs; Source Control BMPs; Treatment Control BMPs; Operation and Maintenance requirements for BMPs; and sources of funding for BMP implementation. (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD73.
|
(RGPA) The Applicant shall select and implement treatment control BMPs that are medium to highly effective for treating Pollutants of Concern (POC) for the project. POC include project pollutants associated with a 303{d) listing or a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for receiving waters. Project pollutants of concern include: sediment/turbidity, nutrients, organic compounds, oxygen demanding substances, and pathogens. Exhibit C of the document, Riverside County Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff dated July 24, 2006 shall be consulted for determining the effectiveness of proposed treatment BMPs. (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD74.
|
(RGPA) Overall, the proposed treatment control concept is accepted as the conceptual treatment control BMP for the proposed site. The Applicant has proposed to incorporate the use of combined detention and infiltration basins with underdrain systems. Final design details of these detention and infiltration systems must be provided in the first submittal of the F-WQMP. The size of the treatment control BMP is to be determined using the procedures set forth in Exhibit C of the Riverside County Guidance Document. The Applicant acknowledges that more area than currently shown on the plans may be required to treat site runoff as required by the WQMP Guidance Document. (Advisory) | |
|
||
LD75.
|
(RGPA) The Applicant shall substantiate the applicable Hydrologic Condition of Concern (HCOC) (WQMP Section IV) in the F-WQMP. The HCOC designates that the project will comply with Condition C; therefore, the condition must be addressed in the F-WQMP. | |
|
||
LD76.
|
(GP) The Applicant shall, prior to building or grading permit closeout or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, demonstrate: |
|
a. | That all structural BMPs have been constructed and installed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications; | ||
|
b. | That all structural BMPs described in the F-WQMP have been implemented in accordance with approved plans and specifications; | ||
|
c. | That the Applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs included in the F-WQMP, conditions of approval, and building/grading permit conditions; and | ||
|
d. | That an adequate number of copies of the approved F-WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants of the project. |
|
(Advisory) |
53 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | |||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
SD-1
|
The parcel(s) associated with this project have been incorporated into the Moreno Valley Community Services Districts Zones A (Parks & Community Services) and C (Arterial Street Lighting). All assessable parcels therein shall be subject to annual Zone A and Zone C charges for operations and capital improvements. | |
|
||
SD-2
|
Plans for parkway, median, slope, and/or open space landscape areas designated on the tentative map or in these Conditions of Approval for incorporation into Moreno Valley Community Services District Zone M, shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the City of Moreno Valley Public Works Department Landscape Design Guidelines. Contact the Special Districts Division of the Public Works Department to obtain copies of this document. | |
|
||
SD-3
|
The Developer, or the Developers successors or assignees shall be responsible for all parkway and/ or median landscaping maintenance until such time as the District accepts maintenance duties. |
54 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | |||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
SD-4
|
Any damage to existing landscape easement areas due to project construction shall be repaired/replaced by the Developer, or Developers successors in interest, at no cost to the Moreno Valley Community Services District. |
SD-5
|
(BP) This project has been identified to be included in the formation of a Map Act Area of Benefit Special District for the construction of major thoroughfares and/or freeway improvements. The property owner(s) shall participate in such District, and pay any special tax, assessment, or fee levied upon the project property for such District. At the time of the public hearing to consider formation of the district, the property owner(s) will not protest the formation, but the property owners(s) will retain the right to object if any eventual assessment is not equitable, that is, if the financial burden of the assessment is not reasonably proportionate to the benefit which the affected property obtains from the improvements which are to be installed. (Street & Highway Code, GP Objective 2.14.2, MC 9.14.100) Once the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) is paid, the requirement to annex into the Special District would no longer be applicable. | |
|
||
SD-6
|
(BP) This project has been identified to be included in the formation of a Community Facilities District (Mello-Roos) for Public Safety services, including but not limited to Police, Fire Protection, Paramedic Services, Park Rangers, and Animal Control services: The property owner(s) shall not protest the formation; however, they retain the right to object to the rate and method of maximum special tax. In compliance with Proposition 218, the Developer shall agree to approve the mail ballot proceeding (special election) for either formation of the CFD or annexation into an existing district that may already be established. The Developer must notify Special Districts prior to the Citys issuance of a building permit. (California Government Code) This condition would no longer apply if the building permit is issued prior to the formation of the Public Safety Community Facilities District. | |
|
||
SD-7
|
(BP) This project is conditioned to provide a funding source for the capital improvements and/or maintenance for the Eucalyptus Ave. median landscape. In order for the Developer to meet the financial responsibility to maintain the defined service, one of the following options shall be selected: |
55 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | |||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
a.
|
Participate in the mail ballot proceeding in compliance with Proposition 218, for Moreno Valley Community Services District Zone M (Commercial, Industrial and Multifamily Improved Median Maintenance), and pay all associated costs with the ballot process; or | |
b.
|
Establish an endowment to cover the future maintenance costs of the landscaped area. |
|
The Developer must notify Special Districts prior to the Citys issuance of a building permit and the financial option selected to fund the continued maintenance. | |
|
||
SD-8
|
Commercial (BP) Land Development, a Division of the Public Works Department, requires this project to supply a funding source necessary to provide, but not limited to, stormwater utilities services for the monitoring of on site facilities and performing annual inspections of the affected areas to ensure compliance with state mandated stormwater regulations, the Developer must notify Special Districts prior to the Citys issuance of a building permit and the financial option selected to fund the continued maintenance. (California Government Code) | |
|
||
SD-9
|
(BP) Prior to release of building permit, the Developer, or the Developers successors or assignees, shall record with the County Recorders Office a Declaration of Covenant and Acknowledgement of Assessments for each assessable parcel therein, whereby the Developer covenants and acknowledges the existence of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, its established benefit zones, and that said parcel(s) is (are) liable for payment of annual benefit zone charges and the appropriate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) maximum regulatory rate schedule when due. A copy of the recorded Declaration of Covenant and Acknowledgement of Assessments shall be submitted to the Special Districts Division. | |
|
||
|
**For a copy of the Declaration of Covenant and Acknowledgement of the Assessments form, please contact Special Districts, phone 951.413.3480. | |
|
||
SD-10
|
(BP) Final median, parkway, slope, and/or open space landscape/irrigation plans for those areas designated on the tentative map or in these Conditions of Approval for inclusion into Community Services District shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department Planning Division, and the Public Works Department |
56 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | |||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
|
Special Districts and Transportation Divisions prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. |
SD-11
|
(CO) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the Developer shall submit a letter to Special Districts from the Utility service responsible for providing final electrical energy connections and energization of the streetlights for the development project. The letter must identify, by pole number, each streetlight in the development and state the corresponding date of its electrical energization. | |
|
||
SD-12
|
(CO) All median landscaping specified in the tentative map or in these Conditions of Approval shall be constructed pursuant to the project phasing plan dated December 10, 2008. | |
|
||
SD-13
|
(CO) Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy or building final for this project, the Developer shall pay Advanced Energy fees for all applicable Zone B (Residential Street Lighting) and/or Zone C (Arterial Street Lighting and Intersection Lighting) streetlights required for this development. The Developer shall provide a receipt to the Special Districts Division showing that the Advanced Energy fees have been paid in full for the number of streetlights to be accepted into the CSD Zone B and/or Zone C program. Payment shall be made to the City of Moreno Valley, as collected by the Land Development Division, based upon the Advanced Energy fee rate at the time of payment and as set forth in the current Listing of City Fees, Charges and Rates, as adopted by City Council. Any change in the project which may increase the number of streetlights to be installed will require payment of additional Advanced Energy fees at the then current fee. |
57 | Resolution No. 2009-11 | |||
Exhibit A | ||||
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009 |
TE1.
|
Install Citywide Communication System (Traffic Signal Interconnect) per City Standards along Eucalyptus Avenue and Theodore Street. | |
|
||
TE2.
|
A Class I Bikeway is planned for the east side of Redlands Boulevard that shall require additional right-of-way and/or easements. | |
|
||
TE3.
|
The project applicant shall submit supplemental traffic studies at the time of entitlement of Phase 2 (Parcels 2 and 3) and again at Phase 3 (Parcel 4). The supplemental traffic studies shall address improvements necessary for the two phases that could include but not be limited to traffic signals, additional turn lanes, traffic signal synchronization/timing, interchange improvements, fair share contributions, median construction, and traffic control at project driveways. Conditions of approval for Phase 2 and Phase 3 plot plans shall be based upon the findings of the supplemental traffic studies, and conditioned improvements shall be required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the respective phases. |
TE4.
|
(GP) Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Phase 1, the project applicant shall submit conceptual striping plans for street improvements along Eucalyptus Avenue as well as Theodore Street. |
TE5.
|
The driveways less than 40 feet in width shall conform to Section 9.16.250, and Table 9.16.250A of the Citys Development Code Design Guidelines, and City |
58
|
Standard Plan No. 118C. Driveways wider than 40 shall be designed as intersections with pedestrian access ramps per City standards (Advisory). | |
|
||
TE6.
|
Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans, a signing and striping plan shall be prepared per City of Moreno Valley Standard Plans Section 4 for all streets with a cross section of 66/44 and wider (Advisory). | |
|
||
TE7.
|
Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans, the developer shall submit to the City a contract between the developer and a street sweeping company for sweeping the streets during the warranty period, for the day shown on the posted street sweeping signage. The contract shall include a contact person and phone number for said contact person (Advisory). | |
|
||
TE8.
|
Prior to issuance of a construction permit, construction traffic control plans prepared by a qualified, Registered Civil or Traffic engineer shall be required (Advisory). | |
|
||
TE9.
|
Sight distance at driveways and on streets shall conform to City Standard Plan No. 125 A, B, and C at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape, and street improvements (Advisory). | |
|
||
TE10.
|
Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans, interim and ultimate alignment studies shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. | |
|
||
TE11.
|
Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 1, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Theodore Street and Eucalyptus Avenue to provide the following geometrics: | |
|
||
|
Northbound: One left turn lane, one through lane | |
|
Southbound: One through lane, one right turn lane | |
|
Eastbound: One left turn lane, one right turn lane. | |
|
Westbound: N/A | |
|
||
|
NOTE: All curb return radii shall be 50 feet. | |
|
||
TE12.
|
Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 1, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Theodore Street and SR-60 Eastbound Ramp to provide the following geometrics: | |
|
||
|
Northbound: One left turn lane, one through lane | |
|
Southbound: One shared through/right turn lane | |
|
Eastbound: One left turn lane, one right turn lane | |
|
Westbound: N/A | |
|
||
|
NOTE: All curb return radii shall be 50 feet. |
59
TE13.
|
Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 1, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Theodore Street and SR-60 Westbound Ramp to provide the following geometrics: | |
|
||
|
Northbound: One through lane, pavement widening to accommodate turning trucks | |
|
Southbound: One shared left turn/through lane | |
|
Eastbound: N/A | |
|
Westbound: One shared left turn/right turn lane | |
|
||
TE14.
|
Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans for Phase 3, the project applicant shall design the intersection of Redlands Boulevard and Eucalyptus Avenue for its ultimate cross-section to include the following: | |
|
||
|
Northbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane | |
|
Southbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane | |
|
Eastbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane | |
|
Westbound: Two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one right turn lane | |
|
||
|
NOTE: All curb return radii shall be 50 feet. | |
|
||
TE15.
|
Prior to final approval of the street improvement plans, the project applicant shall design bus bays per City Standard Plan No. 121 at the following locations: |
TE16.
|
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all approved signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards and the approved plans (Advisory). | |
|
||
TE17.
|
(CO) Each gated entrance shall be provided with the following, or as approved by the City Traffic Engineer: |
60
|
All of these features must be kept in working order. | |
|
||
TE18.
|
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 1, the project applicant shall construct the intersection/roadway improvements identified in TE11, TE12, and TE13 per the approved plans. | |
|
||
TE19.
|
(CO) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 3, the project applicant shall construct the east leg of the Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Avenue intersection per TE14. Necessary improvements to the other legs of the intersection shall be identified in the supplemental traffic study per TE3. | |
|
||
TE20.
|
(CO) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project, driveway access at the following locations will be installed as follows: |
|
The easternmost driveway: full access. | |
|
The second driveway from the east: right-in, right-out access by means of a raised median. | |
|
The third driveway from the east (employee parking lot): full access. | |
|
The second driveway from the west: right-in, right-out by means of a raised median. | |
|
The westernmost driveway: full access. | |
|
Additional driveways for Phases 2 and 3 shall be reviewed at the time of their entitlement, and conditions of approval | |
|
shall be prepared as necessary regarding access. | |
|
||
|
NOTE: All truck driveways shall have curb return radii of 50 feet. |
TE21.
|
Prior to the acceptance of streets into the City-maintained road system, all approved traffic control and signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards and the approved plans (Advisory). |
61
62
Parks and Community Services Department | December 29, 2008 | |
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | ||
Case No. PA07-0091 Plot Plan |
a. | Trail and bikeway construction shall adhere to: The Citys Standard Plans, The Greenbook Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, California Code of Regulations Title 24 (where applicable), and the Park and Community Services Specification Guide. (Advisory Condition) |
b. | The General Contractor shall be a State of California Class A General Engineering Contractor, per the Business and Professions Code Section 7056, or a combination of State of California Class C licenses for which the work is being performed. Licenses must be current and in good standing, for the duration of the project. (Advisory Condition) |
c. | Trails and bikeways shall not be shared with any above ground utilities, blocking total width access. (Advisory) |
d. | The following plans require Parks and Community Services written approval: Tentative tract/parcel maps; rough grading plans (including all Delta changes); Final Map; precise grading plans; street improvement plans; traffic signal plans; fence and wall plans; landscape plans for areas adjacent to trails; trail improvement plans. (Advisory) |
e. | (GP) A detailed rough grading plan with profile for the trail shall be submitted and approved by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee prior to the issuance of grading permits. (Advisory) |
f. | Grading certification and compaction tests for trails and bikeways are required, prior to any trail or bikeway improvements being installed. (Advisory) |
g. | A minimum two-foot graded bench is required where trails adjoin landscaped or open space areas. (Advisory) |
h. | (BP) Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, final improvement plans (mylars and AutoCAD & PDF file on a CD-ROM) shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department Planning Division; the Public Works Department Land Development and Transportation Division; Fire Prevention; and Parks and Community Services Department. Landscaped areas adjacent to the trail or bikeway shall be designed to prevent water on the trail or bikeway. (Advisory) |
i. | Two sets of complete trail and bikeway improvement plans shall be submitted to Parks and Community Services for routing. Adjacent landscaping and walls shall be shown on the plans. Final construction plans and details require wet stamped and signed Mylars, eight sets of bond copies and one Mylar copy from the City signed mylars, the AutoCAD file on CD, and a PDF file on CD. As-builts for the trails and bikeways have the same requirements as final plan submittals. (Advisory) |
j. | All street crossings shall be signed with approved STOP signs, trail signs, and posts. All improved equestrian trail crossings at signalized intersections that are constructed at their ultimate locations shall have 6 high mounted push buttons. These shall be coordinated through the Transportation Division. (Advisory) |
k. | CSD Zone A plan check fees shall be paid prior to the second plan check. (Advisory) |
l. | CSD Zone A inspection fees shall be paid prior to signing of Mylars. (Advisory) |
63
Parks and Community Services Department | December 29, 2008 | |
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | ||
Case No. PA07-0091 Plot Plan |
m. | The trail and bikeway shall be surveyed and staked by the developer. The trail shall be inspected and approved by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee prior to the commencement of related work. (Advisory) |
n. | Any damage to bikeways, trails, or fencing during construction shall be repaired by the developer and inspected by the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee; prior to Certificate of Occupancy. (Advisory) |
o. | Concrete access areas to trails with decomposed granite surfaces shall be rough finished concrete (typically tine finish). The access shall extend to the main trail flat surface. (Advisory) |
p. | In order to prevent the delay of building permit issuance, any deviation from trail fencing materials or trail surface materials shall be submitted to Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee and approved in writing 60-days prior to the commencement of trail construction. (Advisory) |
q. | Any unauthorized deviation from the approved plan, specifications, City Standard Plans, or Conditions of Approval may result in the delay of building permit issuance and/or building Finals/ Certificate of Occupancy of the project conditioned for improvements. (Advisory) |
r. | Where required , decorative solid-grouted block wall (no precision block, stucco, veneer finishes, PVC, or wood fencing) with a minimum height of 72 on the trailside shall be installed along lots that adjoin the trail. Block walls shall be located solely on private property. If landscaping is to be utilized between the block wall and the trail, a PVC fence shall be installed along the trail separating the landscaping from the trail (where required). All block walls that have public view shall have an anti-graffiti coating per Parks and Community Services specifications. Combination block/tubular steel fences shall only be utilized where approved by Parks and Community Services. Tubular steel shall comply with Parks and Community Services standards. Coating for tubular steel shall be anti-graffiti coating for metal per Parks Community Services specifications. If alternate products are requested, the requested material(s) shall be presented to the Director of Parks and Community Services or his/her designee for review and approval. Under no circumstances can alternate products be utilized without prior written authorization from the Parks and Community Services Director or his/her designee. (Advisory) |
s. | Any damage to existing landscape or hardscape areas due to project construction shall be repaired/replaced by the developer, or developers successors in interest, at no cost to the City or Community Services District. (Advisory) |
t. | All inspections shall be requested two (2) working days in advance from the Parks and Community Services Department at the time of rough and precise grading; fence and gate installation; curb and drainage; flatwork; D.G. installation; graffiti coating; and final inspection. (Advisory) |
64
PD1. | Prior to the start of any construction, temporary security fencing shall be erected. The fencing shall be a minimum of six (6) feet high with locking, gated access and shall remain through the duration of construction. Security fencing is required if there is: construction, unsecured structures, unenclosed storage of materials and/or equipment, and/or the condition of the site constitutes a public hazard as determined by the Public Works Department. If security fencing is required, it shall remain in place until the project is completed or the above conditions no longer exist. (DC 9.08.080) (Advisory) |
PD2. | (GP) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a temporary project identification sign shall be erected on the site in a secure and visible manner. The sign shall be conspicuously posted at the site and remain in place until occupancy of the project. The sign shall include the following: |
a. | The name (if applicable) and address of the development. | ||
b. | The developers name, address, and a 24-hour emergency telephone number. (DC 9.08.080) (Advisory) |
PD3. | (CO) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an Emergency Contact information Form for the project shall be completed at the permit counter of the Community and Economic Development Department Building Division for routing to the Police Department. (DC 9.08.080) (Advisory) |
PD4. | Addresses needs to be in plain view visible from the street and visible at night. It needs to have a backlight, so the address will reflect at night or a lighted address will be sufficient. (Advisory) |
PD5. | All exterior doors in the rear and the front of the buildings need an address or suite number on them. (Advisory) |
PD6. | All rear exterior doors should have an overhead low sodium light or a light comparable to the same. (Advisory) |
PD7. | The exterior of the building should have high-pressure sodium lights and or Metal halide lights installed and strategically placed throughout the exterior of the building. The parking lots should have adequate lighting to insure a safe environment for customers and or employees. (Advisory) |
PD8. | All landscape cover should not exceed over 3 from the ground in the parking lot. |
PD9. | Bushes that are near the exterior of the building should not exceed 4 and should not be planted directly in front of the buildings or walkways. |
PD10. | Trees, which exceed 20, should have a 7 visibility from the ground to the bottom half of the tree. This is so that patrons or employees can view the whole parking lot while parking their vehicles in the parking lot. |
PD11. | Cash registers shall be placed near the front entrance of any retail portion of the establishment or as approved by the Police Chief. |
PD12. | Window coverings shall comply with the city ordinance. |
PD13. | No loitering signs shall be posted in plain view throughout the building, or as approved by the Police Chief. |
(R) If the project is a multi-family development, townhome,
condominium, apartment, commercial or industrial project, and it
requires the installation of electric distribution facilities
within common areas, a non-exclusive easement shall be provided
to Moreno Valley Utility to include all such common areas. All
easements shall include the rights of ingress and egress for the
purpose of operation, maintenance, facility repair, and meter
reading.
(BP)
City of Moreno Valley Municipal Utility Service Electrical
Distribution:
Prior to issuance of building permit, the developer shall
submit a detailed engineering plan showing design, location and schematics
for the utility system to be approved by the City Engineer. In accordance
with Government Code Section 66462, the Developer
shall
execute an agreement
with the City providing for the installation, construction, improvement and
dedication of the utility system following recordation of final map and
concurrent with trenching operations and other subdivision improvements so
long as said agreement incorporates the approved engineering plan and
provides financial security to guarantee completion and dedication of the
utility system.
The Developer
shall
coordinate and receive approval from the City Engineer to
install, construct, improve, and dedicate to the City, or the Citys
designee, all utility infrastructure (including but not limited to conduit,
equipment, vaults, ducts, wires, switches, conductors, transformers,
resistors, amplifiers, and bring-up facilities including electrical
capacity to serve the identified development and other adjoining/abutting/ or
benefiting projects as determined by Moreno Valley Utility) collectively
referred to as utility system (to and through the development), along with
any appurtenant real property easements, as determined by the City Engineer
to be necessary for the distribution and /or delivery of any and all utility
services to each lot and unit within the Tentative Map. For purposes of this
condition, utility services shall mean electric service and utility-related
telecommunication only Utility services shall not include sewer, water, and
natural gas services, which are addressed by other conditions of approval.
Properties within development will be subject to an electrical system
capacity charge and that contribution will be collected prior to issuance of
building permits.
67
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
The City, or the Citys designee, shall utilize
dedicated utility facilities to ensure safe, reliable, sustainable and
cost effective delivery of utility services and maintain the integrity
of streets and other public infrastructure. Developer shall, at
developers sole expense, install or cause the installation of such
interconnection facilities as may be necessary to connect the electrical
distribution infrastructure within the project to the Moreno Valley
Utility owned and controlled electric distribution system.
Alternatively, developer may cause the project to be included in or
annexed to a community facilities district established or to be
established by the City for the purpose of financing the installation of
such interconnection and distribution facilities. The project shall be
deemed to have been included in or annexed to such a community
facilities district upon the expiration of the statute of limitations to
any legal challenges to the levy of special taxes by such community
facilities district within the property. The statute of limitations
referred to above will expire 30 days after the date of the election by
the qualified electors within the project to authorize the levy of
special taxes and the issuance of bonds.
The installation of any proposed temporary overhead electric
distribution lines to be constructed to serve the subject project will
be installed/executed pursuant to a temporary utility service agreement.
The service agreement will address such things as the necessary
electrical circuit protection, as well as the requirement to permanently
relocate any temporary overhead to a permanent underground system in a
timely manner (not greater than 36 months) consistent with the
requirements of the service agreement and pursuant to applicable state
law.
An electrical protection coordination study shall be performed and
stamped by a registered professional electrical engineer in the State of
California and submitted to the utility for review and approval prior to
construction of the temporary overhead line consistent with the service
agreement.
Once the protection settings are approved and test reports performed, a
certified apparatus technician shall be submitted to the utility for
review. Any protection studies shall be stamped by the applicants
registered professional electrical engineer.
A specific easement will be required for the entire overhead line
extension constructed outside of the public right-of-way consistent with
the service agreement.
68
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
This project may be subject to a Reimbursement Agreement. The project
may be responsible for a proportionate share of costs associated with
electrical distribution infrastructure previously installed that
directly benefits the project. The project may be subject to a system
wide capacity charge in addition to the referenced reimbursement
agreement. Payment(s) shall be required prior to issuance of building
permit(s).
69
Resolution No. 2009 -11
Exhibit A
Date Adopted: February 10, 2009
|
EXECUTED IN FOUR COUNTERPARTS
AIA Document A312
Performance Bond
|
Safeco Insurance Companies
Safeco Plaza Seattle, WA 98185 BOND #6592411 PREMIUM: $352,418 |
CONTRACTOR (Name and Address):
|
SURETY (Name and Principal Place of Business): | |
|
||
J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC.
6865 AIRPORT DRIVE RIVERSIDE, CA 92504 |
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Safeco Plaza, Seattle, WA 98185 |
OWNER (Name and Address):
|
HF LOGISTICS-SKX T1, LLC | |
|
14225 CORPORATE WAY | |
|
MORENO VALLEY, CA 92553 |
Description (Name and Location):
|
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK, SKECHERS DISTRIBUTION CENTER 29800 EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, RANCHO BELAGO, CA 92555 |
BOND | ||||
|
Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date): | 04/23/2010 | ||
|
Amount: $58,888,374.00 |
|
Modifications to this Bond: | o None | ý See Page 2 |
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL
Company: J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC. (Corporate Seal) |
SURETY
Company: Safeco Insurance Company of America |
|
Signature:
|
/s/ Joel Alexander
|
Signature: |
/s/ Lexie Sherwood
|
|||||
Name and Title: Joel Alexander, VP/CFO | Name and Title: LEXIE SHERWOOD / ATTORNEY-IN-FACT | |||||||
(Any additional signatures appear on page 2.) | ||||||||
(FOR INFORMATION ONLY Name, Address and Telephone) | OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer or other party): | |||||||
AGENT or BROKER: | ||||||||
CULBERTSON INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. (714) 921-0530
5500 E. SANTA ANA CANYON RD. #201, ANAHEIM, CA 92807 |
HPA, INC.
18831 BARDEEN AVE., SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92612 |
SURETY 5026 (6-92)
S-1852/SA 10/99 |
Safeco and the Safeco logo are registered trademarks of Safeco Corporation
XDP |
Page 1 of 2
1 | After investigation, determine the amount for which it may be liable to the Owner and, as soon as practicable after the amount is determined, tender payment therefor to the Owner, or | ||
2 | Deny liability in whole or in part and notify the Owner citing reasons therefor. |
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL | ||||||||
Company: | Company: Safeco Insurance Company of America | (Corporate Seal) | ||||||
Signature:
|
Signature: | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Name and Title: | Name and Title: | |||||||
Address: | Address: Safeco Plaza, Seattle, WA 98185 |
Page 2 of 2
State of California
|
}
|
|
County of Orange
|
On
|
4-23-10 | before me, | Jan C. Moran, Notary Public | |||
|
||||||
|
Date | Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer |
personally appeared
|
Lexie Sherwood | |
|
||
|
Name(s) of Signer(s) | |
|
||
|
Signature |
/s/ Jan C. Moran
|
||||
|
Signature of Notary Public | |||||
Place Notary Seal Above
|
Jan C. Moran |
OPTIONAL | ||||
Title or Type of Document:
|
||
|
Document Date:
|
Number of Pages: | |||||
|
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
|
||
|
Signers Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate Officer Title(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
|
Signers Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate Officer Title(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
|
State of California
|
}
|
|
County of RIVERSIDE
|
On
|
4-23-10 | before me, | JM RODRIGUEZ, NOTARY PUBLIC | |||
|
||||||
|
Date | Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer |
personally appeared
|
JOEL ALEXANDER | |
|
||
|
Name(s) of Signer(s) | |
|
||
|
Signature |
JM Rodriguez
|
||||
Place Notary Seal Above
|
Notary Public |
OPTIONAL | ||||
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY |
Safeco Insurance Company of America
General Insurance Company of America 1001 4th Avenue Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98154 |
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
|
No. 13294 |
|
||
Dexter R. Legg, Secretary
|
Timothy A. Mikolajewskl, Vice President |
On any certificate executed by the Secretary or an assistant secretary of the Company setting out, |
(i) | The provisions of Article V, Section 13 of the By-Laws, and | ||
(ii) | A copy of the power-of-attorney appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and | ||
(iii) | Certifying that said power-of-attorney appointment is in full force and effect, |
|
||||
|
Dexter R. Legg, Secretary |
|
Safeco Insurance Companies
Safeco Plaza Seattle, WA 98185 |
1. | The name of BANK OF AMERICA NA AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT FOR ITSELF AND THE LENDERS, as Additional Obligee, shall be added to said bond as a named Obligee. | ||
2. | The rights of Additional Obligee as a named Obligee shall be subject to the condition precedent that the Original Obligees obligations under the contract be performed. | ||
3. | The aggregate liability of the Surety under said bond to the Original Obligee and Additional Obligee, as their interests may appear, is limited to the penal sum of the said bond. | ||
4. | The Surety, as its option, may make any payment under said bond by check issued jointly to the Original Obligee and Additional Obligee. | ||
5. | The purpose of this Rider is to add an Additional Obligee only and is not intended to affect or alter the terms and conditions of this bond. |
(Seal if corporation) | HF LOGISTICS-SKX T1, LLC | |||||||||
Attest | Original Obligee | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
By | /s/ Iddo Benzeevi | ||||||||
|
BANK OF AMERICA NA AS ADMINISTRATIVE | |||||||||
(Seal if corporation) | AGENT FOR ITSELF AND THE LENDERS | |||||||||
Attest | Additional Obligee | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
By | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA | ||||||||||
|
J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC. | |||||||||
|
Principal | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
By
|
/s/ LEXIE SHERWOOD
|
|||||||||
|
Attorney-in-Fact | By |
/s/ JOEL ALEXANDER
|
State of California County of Orange |
} |
On
|
4-23-10
|
before me, |
Jan C. Moran, Notary Public
|
, |
personally appeared
|
Lexie Sherwood
Name(s) of Signer(s)
|
|||
, |
|
Signature |
/s/ Jan C. Moran
|
||||
|
Signature of Notary Public | |||||
Place Notary Seal Above
|
Jan C. Moran |
|
OPTIONAL |
|
Title or Type of Document: |
Document Date: | Number of Pages: | |||||||
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
|
Signers Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate Officer Title(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
|
Signers Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate Officer Title(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
|
State of California County of RIVERSIDE |
} |
On
|
4-23-10
|
before me, |
JM RODRIGUEZ, NOTARY PUBLIC
|
, |
personally appeared
|
JOEL ALEXANDER
Name(s) of Signer(s)
|
|||
, |
|
Signature |
/s/ JM RODRIGUER, NORTY PUBLIC
|
||||
Place Notary Seal Above
|
Signature of Notary Public |
OPTIONAL | ||
|
POWER
OF ATTORNEY |
Safeco Insurance Company of America
General Insurance Company of America 1001 4th Avenue Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98154 |
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
|
No . 13294 | |
That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corporation, does each hereby appoint |
|
Dexter R. Legg, Secretary
|
Timothy A. Mikolajewski, Vice President | |
Dexter R. Legg, Secretary |
EXECUTED IN FOUR COUNTERPARTS | PAYMENT BOND |
Bond #6592411
PREMIUM: INCLUDED IN PERFORMANCE BOND |
CONTRACTOR (Name and Address):
|
SURETY: | |
J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC.
|
Safeco Insurance Company of America | |
6865 AIRPORT DRIVE
|
||
RIVERSIDE, CA 92504
|
Safeco Plaza, Seattle, WA 98185 |
Description (Name and Location): | HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK, SKECHERS DISTRIBUTION CENTER 29800 EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, RANCHO BELAGO, CA 92555 |
Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date): 04/23/2010 | ||||
Amount: $58,888,374.00
|
||||
Modifications to this Bond:
|
o None | x See Page 3 | ||
|
||||
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL
|
SURETY Safeco Insurance Company of America | |||
Company: J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC.
|
Signature:
|
/s/ Joel Alexander | Signature: | /s/ Lexie Sherwood | |||||
|
||||||||
Name and Title:
|
JOEL ALEXANDER VP/CFO | Name and Title: | LEXIE SHERWOOD /ATTORNEY-IN-FACT |
(FOR INFORMATION ONLY-Name, Address and Telephone) AGENT or BROKER:
|
OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer or other party): HPA, INC. | |
CULBERTSON
INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. (714) 921-0530
|
18831 BARDEEN AVE., SUITE 100 | |
5500
E. SANTA ANA CANYON RD. #201, ANAHEIM, CA 92807
|
IRVINE, CA 92612 |
Page 1 of 3
.1 | Have furnished written notice to the Contractor and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the Owner, within 90 days after having last performed labor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the claim stating, with substantial accuracy, the amount of the claim and the name of the party to whom the materials were furnished or supplied or for whom the labor was done or performed; and | ||
.2 | Have either received a rejection in whole or in part from the Contractor, or not received within 30 days of furnishing the above notice any communication from the Contractor by which the Contractor has indicated the claim will be paid directly or indirectly; and | ||
.3 | Not having been paid within the above 30 days, have sent a written notice to the Surety (at the address described in Paragraph 12) and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the Owner, stating that a claim is being made under this Bond and enclosing a copy of the previous written notice furnished to the Contractor. |
Page 2 of 3
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL | (Corporate Seal) | SURETY | ||||||||||
Company:
|
Company: | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Signature:
|
|
Signature: |
|
|||||||||
Name and Title: | Name and Title: | |||||||||||
Address:
|
Address: |
Page 3 of 3
State of California County of Orange |
} |
On
|
4-23-10
|
before me, |
Jan C. Moran, Notary Public
|
personally appeared
|
Lexie Sherwood
Name(s) of Signer(s)
|
|||
Signature
|
|
|||
|
Signature of Notary Public | |||
|
Jan C. Moran |
|
OPTIONAL |
|
Title or Type of Document:
|
Document Date:
|
|
Number of
Pages:
|
Signer(s)
Other Than Named Above:
|
Signers
Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate Officer Title(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
Signers Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate OfficerTitle(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
State of California County of RIVERSIDE |
} |
On
|
4-23-10
|
before me, |
JM RODRIGUEZ, NOTARY PUBLIC
|
, |
personally appeared
|
JOEL ALEXANDER
Name(s) of Signer(s)
|
|||
, |
Signature
|
|
|||
|
Signature of Notary Public | |||
|
Notary Public |
|
OPTIONAL |
|
|
POWER
OF ATTORNEY |
Safeco Insurance Company of America
General Insurance Company of America 1001 4th Avenue Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98154 |
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
|
No. 13294 |
|
||
Dexter R. Legg, Secretary
|
Timothy A. Mikolajewski, Vice President |
Dexter R. Lagg, Secretary Safeco ® and the Safeco logo are registered trademarks of Safeco Corporation. |
S-0974/DS 1/09 | WEB PDF |
|
LENDERS DUAL
OBLIGEE RIDER TO PAYMENT BOND |
Liberty Mutual Surety
1001 4th Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98154 |
EXECUTED IN FOUR COUNTERPARTS
|
Bond #6592411 |
1. | The name of BANK OF AMERICA NA AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT FOR ITSELF AND THE LENDERS as Lender shall be added to said bond as a named Obligee. | |
2. | The rights of the Lender as a named Obligee shall be subject to the condition precedent that the Owners obligations to the Contractor be performed. | |
3. | The total aggregate liability of the Surety under said bond to Owner, Lender, and third party beneficiaries, as their interests may appear, is limited to the penal sum of the said bond. | |
4. | The rights of the Lender as a named Obligee shall be co-extensive with the rights of the Owner and the execution of this rider shall not be construed as conferring any different or greater right to Lender. The intent of this rider is to permit Lender a direct right of action against Principal and Surety under the Payment Bond to enforce their obligation to pay labor and materialmen claimants who are protected and who have perfected their right under said bond and for no other purpose. | |
5. | This rider shall not be construed to broaden or change the terms, conditions, or obligations of said Payment Bond insofar as any claimants, as the term claimant is defined therein, are concerned, nor shall this rider inure to the benefit of any person, firm or business organization who does not qualify as claimant under said Payment Bond. | |
6. | Except as herein modified, said Payment Bond shall be and remain in full force and effect. |
(Seal if corporation) | HF Logistics-SKX T1, LLC | |||||||
Attest
|
Owner | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
By |
/s/ Iddo Benzeevi
|
||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
J.D. Diffenbaugh, Inc. | ||||||||
|
Contractor | |||||||
|
||||||||
(Seal if corporation)
|
||||||||
Attest
|
By |
/s/ Joel Alexander
|
||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Safeco Insurance Company of America | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
By |
/s/ Lexie Sherwood
|
||||||
|
|
Attorney-in-Fact |
S-1289/SA 10/99 | XDP |
On
|
4-23-10
|
before me, |
Jan C. Moran, Notary Public
|
, | personally appeared |
Lexie Sherwood
Name(s) of Signer(s)
|
||||
, | ||||
Signature
|
|
|||
|
Signature of Notary Public | |||
|
Jan C. Moran |
|
OPTIONAL |
|
Title or Type of Document: |
Document Date: | Number of Pages: | |||||||
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
|
Signers Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate Officer Title(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
Signers Name:
|
||
o
Individual
|
||
o
Corporate Officer Title(s):
|
o
Partner
o
Limited
o
General
o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: |
State of California County of RIVERSIDE |
} |
On
|
4-23-10
|
before me, |
JM RODRIGUEZ, NOTARY PUBLIC
|
, personally appeared |
JOEL ALEXANDER
Name(s) of Signer(s)
|
||||
, | ||||
Signature |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
OPTIONAL |
|
POWER
OF ATTORNEY |
Safeco Insurance Company of America
General Insurance Company of America 1001 4th Avenue Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98154 |
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: | No. 13294 |
Dexter R. Legg, Secretary | Timothy A. Mikolajewski, Vice President |
(i) | The provisions of Article V, Section 13 of the By-Laws, and | ||
(ii) | A copy of the power-of-attorney appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and | ||
(iii) | Certifying that said power-of-attorney appointment is in full force and effect, |
Dexter R. Legg, Secretary |
DIVISION | SECTION | DESCRIPTION | DURATION | UNIT | NOTES |
DIVISION | SECTION | DESCRIPTION | DURATION | UNIT | NOTES | |||||
|
Site Work | |||||||||
|
09-9113 | Paint - Site | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
10-7516 | Flag Poles & flags | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
12-9313 | Bike Racks, Benches, Pots, Urns, Trash | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
13-1213 | Fountain Entry Feature | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
31-1316 | Stamped Concrete Paving | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-3213 | Site Electrical & Generator | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-1313 | Concrete Paving | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-1219 | Asphalt Concrete Paving | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-1613.13 | Cast-In-Place Concrete Gutters | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-1613.16 | Cast-In-Place Concrete Curbs | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-3119 | Structural Steel (Trash Gates & Lids) | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
33-1116 | Water System | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
33-3113 | Sanitary Sewage Systems | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
33-4113 | Storm Drain System | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
33-4216 | Concrete Storm Drainage Box Culvert | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-1723 | Pavement Marking | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-3113 | Chain Link Fencing & Gates | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-3119 | Decorative Metal Fences & Gates | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-3213 | Cast-In-Place Screen Walls | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
02837 | Slide Gate Operator | 5 | Year | ||||||
|
02890 | Post Mounted Signs | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-8413 | Landscape & Irrigation | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
32-9113.26 | Landscape Planting | 1 | Year | ||||||
|
33-7119.13 | Site Electrical transformers & Vaults | 1 | Year |
DIVISION | SECTION | DESCRIPTION | DURATION | UNIT | NOTES | |||||||
|
Site Work Continued | |||||||||||
|
33-8113 | Low-Voltage Dry Utilities | ||||||||||
|
33-7993 | Street Lighting & Bases | ||||||||||
|
33-7139.23 | Site Underground Electrical | 1 | Year | ||||||||
03-000
|
Concrete | |||||||||||
|
03-2100 | Reinforcing Steel | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
03-3100 | Cast-In-Place Concrete | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
03-4713 | Tilt-Up Concrete Construction | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
03-5113 | Cementitious Underlayment | 1 | Year | ||||||||
04-000
|
Masonry | |||||||||||
|
32-3119 | Unit Masonry Walls | 1 | Year | ||||||||
05-000
|
Metals | |||||||||||
|
05-1223 | Structural Steel Framing | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
05-2119 | Steel Joists | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
05-3113 | Steel Deck | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
05-5963 | Metal Pipe Bollards | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
05-5113 | Metal Stairs | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
05-5213 | Pipe & Tube Railings | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
05-7313 | Glass Raining Systems | Year | |||||||||
06-000
|
Wood & Plastics | |||||||||||
|
06-1113 | Rough Carpentry | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
06-1516 | Panelized Roofing System | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
06-2033 | Finish Carpentry & Millwork | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
06-8200 | Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
Door, Frame & Hardware Installation | 1 | Year | |||||||||
|
06-4116 | Architectural Wood Casework | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
06-2513 | Wood Paneling | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
06-6116 | Plastic Fabrications | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
Solid Polymer Fabrications | 1 | Year | |||||||||
07-000
|
Thermal & Moisture Control | |||||||||||
|
07-1113 | Bituminous Dampproofing | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
07-2616 | Vapor retarders | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
07-2116 | Thermal Insulation | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
07-2113.19 | Reflective Foil Sheet Insulation | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
07-2123 | Sound Attenuation Insulation | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
07-8413 | Firestopping | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
07-9216 | Composite Panels | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
07-5423 | Single Ply Roofing | 20 | Years | NDL | |||||||
|
07-4213 | Sheet Metal Soffits | 20 | Years | ||||||||
|
07-6200 | Sheet Metal Flashing & trim | 1 | Years | ||||||||
|
07-7236 | Smoke Ventilating Skylights | 10 | Years | ||||||||
|
Vertical Joint Sealant | 5 | Years | |||||||||
|
07-7223 | Roof hatches | 5 | Years | ||||||||
|
07-9216 | Joint Sealers | 5 | Years |
DIVISION | SECTION | DESCRIPTION | DURATION | UNIT | NOTES | |||||||
08-000
|
Doors & Windows | |||||||||||
|
08-1213.13 | Hollow Metal Frames | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
08-1313.13 | Hollow Metal Doors | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
08-1213.53 | Refinished Steel Door Frames | 1 | Year | ||||||||
08-1429 | Wood Doors | Full Life | ||||||||||
|
08-3116 | Access Panels | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
08-3323 | Sectional Overhead Doors | 5 | Years | ||||||||
|
08-4113 | Aluminum Entrances & Storefronts | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
08-4226 | All-Glass Entrances | 5 | Years | ||||||||
|
08-7100 | Finish Hardware | ||||||||||
|
Aug-13 | Closers | 10 | Years | ||||||||
|
08-7153 | Exit Devices | 3 | Years | ||||||||
08-7100 | Hinges | Life of Building | ||||||||||
|
08-7100 | Other Hardware | 2 | Years | ||||||||
|
08-8113 | Glazing | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
08-8853 | Fire Rated Glass | 1 | Year | ||||||||
09-000
|
Finishes | |||||||||||
|
09-2116 | Non-Structural Metal Stud Framing | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-2613 | Polished Plaster | 10 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-2116 | Gypsum Board | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-3013 | Tiling | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-5113 | Acoustical Panel Ceiling | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-5113 | Acoustical Panel | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-5113 | Cortega Second Look 2765 Panels | 10 | Years | ||||||||
|
09-5323 | Grid | 10 | Years | ||||||||
|
Fiberglas Reinforced Plastic Panels | 1 | Year | |||||||||
|
09-6223 | Bamboo Flooring | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-6519 | Resilient Tile Flooring | 5 | Years | ||||||||
|
09-6536 | Static-Control Resilient Flooring | 5 | Years | ||||||||
|
09-6515 | Resilient Sheet Flooring | 5 | Years | ||||||||
|
09-6513 | Top-Set Resilient Base | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-6813 | Carpet Tiles | 10 | Years | ||||||||
|
09-6816 | Sheet Carpet | 10 | Years | ||||||||
|
09-9123 | Painting | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-9723 | Concrete Coating Floor Sealer | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
09-7216 | Wall Covering | 1 | Year | ||||||||
10-000
|
Specialties | |||||||||||
|
10-2813.13 | Metal Toilet Compartments | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
10-1433 | Building Accessibility Signage | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
10-1400 | Plastic Signs Restroom | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
10-4116 | Emergency Key Cabinets (Knox Box) | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
Miscellaneous Specialties | 1 | Year | |||||||||
|
10-4116 | Fire Extinguishers & cabinets | 1 | Year | ||||||||
`
|
10-5113 | Lockers (Solid Plastic) | 1 | Year |
DIVISION | SECTION | DESCRIPTION | DURATION | UNIT | NOTES | |||||||
10-000
|
Specialties Continued | |||||||||||
|
10-8213 | Airfoil Louvers & Wire Screening | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
10-2813.13 | Commercial Toilet Accessories | 1 | Year | ||||||||
11-000
|
Equipment | |||||||||||
|
11-1313 | Loading Dock Bumpers | 2 | Years | ||||||||
|
1 | Year | ||||||||||
12-000
|
Furnishings | |||||||||||
|
12-2413 | Roller Window Shades | 1 | Year | ||||||||
13-000
|
Special Construction | |||||||||||
|
N/A | |||||||||||
14-000
|
Conveying Systems | |||||||||||
|
14-2423 | Hydraulic Elevator | 1 | Year | ||||||||
21-000
|
Fire Suppression System | |||||||||||
|
21-1116 | Fire Hydrants / Fire-Dept. Connections | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
21-1313 | Wet-Pipe Fire Sprinlker System | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
21-3116 | Diesel-Drive, Fire Pump | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
21-2213 | Clean Agent Fire Extingushing | 1 | Year | ||||||||
22-000
|
Plumbing | |||||||||||
|
22-4213 | Commercial Water Closet | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
22-4213 | Commercial Urinals | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
22-3320.23 | Solar Water Heaters | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
22-4523 | Personal Eyewash Equipment | ||||||||||
|
22-4239 | Plumbing Fixtures | 1 | Year | ||||||||
23-000
|
Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning | |||||||||||
|
23-3113 | HVAC Ducts & Casings | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
23-3423 | HVAC Ower Ventilators | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
23-6213 | Refrigerant Compressors | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
23-7413 | Outdoor, Central-Station Air-Handling | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
25-1313 | Automation Control & Monitoring | 1 | Year | ||||||||
26-0000
|
Electrical | |||||||||||
|
26-0100 | Electrical | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
26-0923 | Lighinting Control Devises | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
26-5113 | Lighting | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
26-2100 | Low-Voltage Power Systems | ||||||||||
|
26-5623 | Site Lighting | 1 | Year | ||||||||
|
26-0100 | Electrical Distribution | 1 | Year | ||||||||
27-000
|
Communications | |||||||||||
|
27-1313 | Communications | 1 | Year | ||||||||
28-000
|
Fire Detection & Alarm | |||||||||||
|
28-3100 | Fie Alarm | 1 | Year |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK | ||
HPA 7086 | Moreno Valley, California |
1.01 | SUMMARY |
A. | Section Includes: |
1. | Preparation and submittal, general administrative and procedural requirements. | ||
2. | Time and schedule of submittals. | ||
3. | Certifications and other commitments and agreements for continuing services to Owner are specified elsewhere in the Contract Documents. |
1.02 | DEFINITIONS |
A. | Warranty: Assurance to Owner by the Contractor, installer, supplier, manufacturer or other party responsible as warrantor, for the quantity, quality, performance and other representations of a product, system, service of the Work, in whole or in part, for the duration of the specified period of time. | ||
B. | Guarantee: Assurance to Owner by Contractor or product manufacturer or other specified party, as guarantor, that the specified Warranty will be fulfilled by the guarantor in the event of default by the warrantor. | ||
C. | Standard Product Warranty: Preprinted, written Warranty published by product manufacturer for particular products and specifically endorsed by the manufacturer to the Owner | ||
D. | Special Project Warranty: Written Warranty required by or incorporated into Contract Documents, to extend time limits provided by standard Warranty or to provide greater rights for Owner. | ||
E. | Extended Warranty: Warranty which entails a longer period of time than the one year standard. | ||
F. | Correction Period: As defined in the Conditions of the Contract, as applicable. Unless otherwise specified, Correction Period shall be synonymous with Warranty Period, Guarantee Period or any similar terms as they appear in the technical Sections of the Specifications. |
1.03 | WARRANTIES AND GUARANTEES |
A. | General: Provide all Warranties and Guarantees with Owner named as beneficiary. For equipment and products, or components thereof, bearing a manufacturers Warranty or Guarantee that extends for a period of time beyond the Contractors Warranty and Guarantee, as required by the conditions for Extended Warranty, so state in the Warranty or Guarantee. | ||
B. | General Warranty and Guarantee Requirements: Warranty shall be an agreement to repair or replace, without cost or undue hardship to the Owner, work performed under the Contract which is found to be defective during the Correction Period (Warranty or Guarantee) period. Repairs and replacements due to improper maintenance or operation or due to normal wear, usage and weathering are excluded from Warranty requirements unless otherwise specified. |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK | ||
HPA 7086 | Moreno Valley, California |
C. | Specific Warranty and Guarantee Requirements: Specific requirements are included in product Specifications named in any Section of the technical specifications, including content and limitations. | ||
D. | Disclaimers and Limitations: Manufacturers disclaimers and limitations on product Warranties and Guarantees shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for Warranty and Guarantee requirements for the Work that incorporates such products, nor shall they relieve suppliers, manufacturers and installers required to countersign special Warranties with Contractor. | ||
E. | Related Damages and Losses: When correcting warranted Work that has been found defective, remove and replace other Work that has been damaged as a result of such defect or that must be removed and replaced to provide access for correction of warranted Work. | ||
F. | Reinstatement of Warranty: When Work covered by a Warranty has been found defective and has been corrected by replacement or rebuilding, reinstate the Warranty by written endorsement. The reinstated Warranty shall be equal to the original Warranty with an equitable adjustment for depreciation. | ||
G. | Replacement Cost: Upon determination that Work covered by as Warranty has been found to be defective, replace or reconstruct the Work to a condition acceptable to Owner, complying with applicable requirements of the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be responsible for all costs for replacing or reconstructing defective Work regardless of whether Owner has benefited from use of the Work through a portion of its anticipated useful service life. | ||
H. | Owners Recourse: Written Warranties made to the Owner shall be in addition to implied Warranties, and shall not limit the duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise available under law, nor shall Warranty periods be interpreted as limitations on time in which the Owner can enforce such other duties, obligations, rights or remedies. | ||
I. | Rejection of Warranties: The Owner reserves the right to reject Warranties and to limit selections to products with Warranties not in conflict with requirements of the Contract Documents. | ||
J. | Warranties as Condition of Approval: Owner reserves the right to refuse to approve Work for the project where a special Warranty, certification or similar commitment shall be required on such Work or part of the Work, until evidence is presented that entities required to countersign such commitments are willing to do so. |
1.04 | FORM OF SUBMITTALS |
A. | Bind in commercial quality, 8-1/2 by 11 inch three-ring side binders. | ||
B. | Label cover of each binder with typed or printed title WARRANTIES AND BONDS, with title of project; name, address and telephone number of Contractor and equipment supplier; and name of responsible principal. | ||
C. | Provide full information, using separate typed sheets as necessary. List Subcontractor, supplier, and manufacturer, with name, address, and telephone number of responsible principal. |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK | ||
HPA 7086 | Moreno Valley, California |
D. | Prepare standard Warranties and Guarantees, excepting manufacturers standard printed Warranties and Guarantees, on Contractors subcontractors, material suppliers or manufacturers own letterhead, addressed to Owner. | ||
E. | Warranty and Guarantee letters shall be signed by all responsible parties and by Contractor in every case, with modifications only as approved in advance by Owner to suit the conditions pertaining to the Warranty or Guarantee. | ||
F. | Manufacturers Standard Forms: Manufacturers Warranty or Guarantee forms may be used. Manufacturers forms shall contain appropriate terms and identification, ready for execution by the required parties. | ||
G. | If proposed terms and conditions restrict Guarantee coverage or require actions by Owner beyond those specified, submit draft of Guarantee to Owner for review and acceptance before performance of the Work. | ||
H. | Signatures: Signatures shall be by the person authorized to sign Warranties, Guarantees and bonds on behalf of entity providing such Warranty, Guarantee or bond. |
1.05 | PREPARATION OF SUBMITTALS |
A. | Obtain Warranties and bonds, executed in duplicate by responsible Subcontractors, suppliers, and manufacturers, within ten days after completion of the applicable item or work. Except for items put into use with Owners permission, leave date of beginning of time of Warranty until the Date of Substantial Completion is determined. | ||
B. | Verify that documents are in proper form, and contain full information. | ||
C. | Retain Warranties and bonds until time specified for submittal. |
1.06 | TIME OF SUBMITTALS |
A. | For equipment or component parts of equipment put into service during construction with Owners permission, submit documents within ten days after certification of beneficial occupancy and Substantial Completion for the item placed into service. | ||
B. | Make other submittals within ten days after Date of Substantial Completion, prior to final Application for Payment. | ||
C. | For items of Work when acceptance is delayed beyond Date of Substantial Completion, submit within ten days after removal of the items from the punch list, listing the date of approval as the beginning of the Warranty period. |
1.07 | DURATION OF WARRANTIES |
A. | Unless otherwise specified or prescribed by law, Warranty periods shall be not less than the Correction Period required by the Conditions of the Contract, but in no case less than one year from the date established for completion of the Project at Substantial Completion. | ||
B. | Refer to Technical Sections of the Specifications for extended Warranty periods designated beyond the minimum one year duration. |
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK | ||
HPA 7086 | Moreno Valley, California |
Page 1
Contractor: | ||||||
|
||||||
J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC. | ||||||
|
||||||
|
By: |
/s/ Joel Alexander
|
||||
|
Name: | Joel Alexander | ||||
|
Title: | V.P./CFO |
Page 2
CONTRACTOR
|
J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC. | (951) 351-6865 | ||||
|
||||||
Address
|
6865 AIRPORT DRIVE | (951) 351-6880 FAX | ||||
|
||||||
City
|
RIVERSIDE | State CA | Zip 92504 | |||
|
||||||
And
|
||||||
|
||||||
SUBCONTRACTOR
|
SUBCONTRACTOR | PHONE | ||||
|
||||||
Address
|
STREET ADDRESS | FAX | ||||
|
||||||
City
|
CITY | State CA | Zip ZIP | |||
|
||||||
On or about the day of , 2009, Contractor entered into a prime contract with: |
OWNER
|
||
|
Address
|
||
|
City
|
State | Zip | ||||||||
|
To perform the following work:
|
SCOPE OF WORK for the General Construction of the PROJECT NAME, project located at |
CONSTRUCTION LENDER
(if applicable)
|
||
|
Address
|
||
|
City
|
State | Zip | ||||||||
|
ARCHITECT
|
||
|
Name
|
||
|
Address
|
||
|
City
|
State | Zip | ||||||||
|
© 1994 Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. | Form AGCC-3 12/94 |
1
1. Exhibit A
|
| Contract Document Log | ||
2. Exhibit B
|
| Scope of Work | ||
3. Exhibit C
|
| Schedule of Values (If Applicable) | ||
4. Exhibit D
|
| Construction Schedule | ||
5. Exhibit E
|
| Insurance Requirements | ||
6. Exhibit F
|
| Progress Billing Requirements & W-9 Form | ||
7. Exhibit G
|
| Training Verification | ||
8. Exhibit H
|
| Responsible, Authorized, Designated Person for Safety Form | ||
9. Exhibit I
|
| Pre-Construction Meeting/Safety Agenda | ||
10. Exhibit J
|
| Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Notification | ||
11. Exhibit K
|
| Project Specific Requirements |
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Dated:
|
|
By
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
6865 Airport Drive | |||
|
(ADDRESS) | |||
|
||||
|
Riverside, CA 92504 | |||
|
||||
|
181805 | |||
|
(CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO.) |
Dated:
|
|
By:
|
|
|||
|
(Signature) | |||
|
||||
|
(Address) | |||
|
||||
|
||||
|
(CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO.) |
9
|
||
(Contractors Initials)
|
(Subcontractors Initials) |
10
|
||
(Contractors Initials)
|
(Subcontractors Initials) |
11
1. | Time is of the essence with regard to this fast track project. Subcontractor agrees to provide the optimum crews and equipment in accordance with the Construction Schedule to insure Subcontractor does not delay the project. The subcontractor agrees to have optimum crew size onsite for the duration of the project, inclusive of 6 days/week throughout the duration of his work. If this subcontractor is performing work in multiple areas of this project that need to be constructed simultaneously, the subcontractor has agreed to provide all necessary manpower, multiple crews, extended work hours, and 6 day work week to ensure the schedule dates are met. It is imperative the subcontractor manages the work force in a manner to avoid any delays what-so-ever, as non- performance, inadequate crew sizes & manpower may result in financial damages which will be the sole responsibility of the Subcontractor which is found to be in default. | |
2. | Per the terms of the Subcontract Agreement and the Addendum to AGCC-3, this Subcontractor is to be bound to the prime contract between Diffenbaugh and the Owner of this project. The following listing is a brief overview of items that are incorporated by reference, but is in no way intended to limit the liability of the Subcontractor with regard to specific items contained therein. The entire prime contract is readily available for perusal by this Subcontractor: | |
3. | The Long Form Standard Subcontract AGC California Subcontract agreement for this project shall be amended as follows: |
a. | Section 13.3: Add the language that certain aspects of this work, including but not limited to work on Eucalyptus street will fall under the prevailing wage requirements. Subcontractor performing work in these areas will be required to abide by the prevailing wage requirements. | ||
b. | Section 16 Insurance: Strike 16.1 to 16.1.5 and insert See Addendum A to the Prime Contract for requirements relative to Subcontractor Insurance Requirements. | ||
c. | In the Addendum to the AGC Subcontract agreement, Paragraph O: Add, This Subcontract is assignable to Owner and its construction lender and may be assumed by Owner or its construction lender in the event of any termination of the Prime Contract, all at the option of Owner and / or its construction lender. This Subcontract is terminable by Owner and/or its construction lender in the event that the Prime Contract is terminated without additional costs beyond that actually incurred to the date of termination. The Owner is an intended third party beneficiary of all warranty/guarantees regarding the Work or materials/equipment furnished and owner may bring claim directly against Subcontractor for breach of contract, warranty rights, quality of workmanship, merchantability of equipment, feasibility and fitness for the particular purpose of materials and equipment and workmanship. |
Subcontractor, Contract No.
|
Exhibit M | |||
|
||||
Project Title, Number
|
(subcontractors Initials ) |
12
Highland Fairview Corporate Park
Skechers Distribution Center
29800 Eucalyptus Avenue
Rancho Belago, California 92555
J.D. Diffenbaugh, Inc.
Purchase Order Log
Job No: 09-231
Date: 4/12/2010
Project No: 09-231
Page: 1 of 1
Revised
PO No.
To
From
Date
Description
Spec Section
Total Cost
Apprvd Changes
Pending Changes
Contract Sum
L&LCLEA
JDD
2/3/2010
Final Clean
01740
$
0.00
$
0.00
MOBIFIR
JDD
9/22/2009
Fire Extinguishers
10520
$
0.00
$
0.00
AMERCOMM
JDD
10/13/2009
Controls and Instrumentation
15900
$
0.00
$
0.00
Totals:
$
0.00
$
0.00
Skechers Distribution Center
29800 Eucalyptus Avenue
Rancho Belago, California 92555
Initial
Buy-out
Date:
Skechers Distribution Center
1,800,000 SF
Uncommitted/
Other JDD
Total Project
Sav / Overrun
Original
Revised
CSI #
Description
Original GMP
CO #
COR thru 1
Revised GMP
Committed
Cost
Cost
to Date
Sub
Contract
SCO
Contract
Temp.Water (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Dust Control (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Restaking (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Genral Job Labor (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Daily Clean Up (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Street Sweeping (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
SWPPP (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Retention Basin (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Site Electrical Services (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Asphalt Paving (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Reproductions (Allow.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
Survey and Staking
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Final Cleaning & Parkg Sweep
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Grading and Excavation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Secondary Erosion Control
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Site Domestic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Site Fire Water
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Santary Sewer
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Storm Drain
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Payement Markings
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Curb and Guttar
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Sidewalks
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Landscape and Imagation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Fencing
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Site Furnishinga
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Retnforcing Steel Bldg
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Building Cancrata Bldg
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Floor Sealer
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Structural Steel
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Rough Carpentry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Panalized Roof
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Waterproofing
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Insufaction
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Marnbrano Roofing
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Flashing and Sheet Metal
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Caulking and Sealants
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Doora Frames Hardware
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Overhead Doors
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Glass And Glazing
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Skyfights
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Knax Box
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Drywall and Metal Studs
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Rubber Base
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Painting
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Exterior Slgnago
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Dock Equipment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Fire Sprinklars
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Plumbing
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
HVAC
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Electrical
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TBD
0
0
Subtotal Hard Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
General Conditions
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JDD
0
0
Fire Access Roads
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JDD
0
0
Subtotal
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
General Liability Insur.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JDD
0
0
Contractors Fee
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JDD
0
0
Contractors Contingancy
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JDD
0
0
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT
|
AIA DOCUMENT G702 | PAGE ONE OF | PAGES | |||||||
TO OWNER:
|
PROJECT: | APPLICATION NO: | Distribution to: | |||||||
|
OWNER | |||||||||
|
ARCHITECT | |||||||||
|
PERIOD TO: | CONTRACTOR | ||||||||
FROM CONTRACTOR:
|
VIA ARCHITECT: | |||||||||
J.D. DIFFENBAUGH, INC.
|
PROJECT # | |||||||||
RIVERSIDE, CA 92506
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
CONTRACT FOR:
|
CONTRACT DATE: |
1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM
|
$ | $0.00 | ||
|
||||
2. Net change by Change Orders
|
$ | | ||
|
||||
3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2)
|
$ | | ||
|
||||
4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE (Column F on G703)
|
$ | $0.00 | ||
|
||||
5. RETAINAGE:
|
||||
a. 10% of Completed Work
(Column D + E on G703) |
$ | 0.00 | ||
|
||||
b. 10% of Stored Material
(Column F on G703) |
$ | 0.00 | ||
|
||||
Total Retainage (Lines 5a + 5b or
Total in Column I of G703)
|
$ | | ||
|
||||
6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE
(Line 4 Less Line 5 Total) |
$ | | ||
|
||||
7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR
PAYMENT
(Line 6 from prior Certificate) |
$ | |||
|
||||
8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE
|
$ | | ||
|
||||
9. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE
(Line 3 less Line 6) |
$ | | ||
|
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY | ADDITIONS | DEDUCTIONS | ||||||
Total changes approved
in previous months by Owner
|
| |||||||
Total approved this Month
|
0.00 | | ||||||
TOTALS
|
0.00 | | ||||||
NET CHANGES by Change Order
|
|
State of:
|
California | County of: | Riverside | |||
Subscribed and sworn to before me this | day of | |||||
Notary Public:
|
||||||
My Commission expires:
|
AMOUNT CERTIFIED
|
$ | $0 |
AIA DOCUMENT G702 APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT 1992 EDITION AtA® © 1992 | ||
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON. DC 2 0006-5292 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIALS | TOTAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WORK COMPLETED | PRESENTLY | COMPLETED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVISED | FROM PREVIOUS | STORED | AND STORED | BALANCE | RETAINAGE | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ITEM | SCHEDULED | CHANGE | CONTRCT | APPLICATION | (NOT IN | TO DATE | % | TO FINISH | (IF VARIABLE | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION OF WORK | VALUE | ADJUSTMENT | ORDER | VALUE | (D + E) | THIS PERIOD | D OR E) | (D+E+F) | (G ÷ C) | (C - G) | RATE) | Due | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0,00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0,00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0,00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0,00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0,00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GRAND TOTALS | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 |
Re: |
Highlands Logistics SKX T1, LLC Highland Fairview Corporate Park Skechers
Distribution Center,
29800 Eucalyptus Avenue, Rancho Belago, CA 92555 |
1. | Bank of America, N.A., as Lender and Administrative Agent, anticipates to close a loan the week April 26, 2010 of $55 million for use on the Project per the terms of the Commitment Letter between Bank of America, N.A. and Borrower; and, | ||
2. | Skechers RB, LLC will deposit $30 million into a Bank of America Escrow Account # 1499708217, entitled in the name of Bank of America, N.A. for the benefit of HF Logistics-SKX T1, LLC for use on the Project upon loan closing. |
Sincerely,
|
||||
/s/ DANETTE FENSTERMACHER | ||||
Danette Fenstermacher | ||||
Highland Fairview
for HF Logistics-SKX T1, LLC |
||||
Bank of America, N.A.
|
||||
/s/ KIM ABREU | ||||
Kim Abreu | ||||
Senior Vice President
Bank of America N.A. |
||||
|
||||
JD Diffenbaugh, Inc.
|
||||
/s/ JOEL ALEXANDER | ||||
Joel Alexander | ||||
Vice President/CFO
JD Diffenbaugh, Inc. |
||||
Page 1 of 50
Page 2 of 50
Page 3 of 50
Page 4 of 50
Page 5 of 50
Page 6 of 50
Page 7 of 50
Page 8 of 50
Page 9 of 50
Page 10 of 50
Page 11 of 50
Page 12 of 50
Page 13 of 50
Page 14 of 50
Page 15 of 50
Page 16 of 50
Page 17 of 50
.1 | allowances shall cover the cost to the Contractor of materials and equipment delivered at the site and all required taxes, less applicable trade discounts; | ||
.2 | Contractors costs for unloading and handling at the site, labor, installation costs, overhead, profit and other expenses contemplated for stated allowance amounts shall be included in the Contract Sum but not in the allowances; | ||
.3 | whenever costs are more than or less than allowances, the Contract Sum shall be adjusted accordingly by Change Order. The amount of the Change Order shall reflect (1) the difference between actual costs and the allowances under Section 3.8.2.1 and (2) changes in Contractors costs under Section 3.8.2.2. In the event of a Change Order executed for the purpose of adjusting an allowance, the Contractors fee shall be 1.75%. |
Page 18 of 50
Page 19 of 50
Page 20 of 50
Page 21 of 50
Page 22 of 50
Page 23 of 50
Page 24 of 50
Page 25 of 50
.1 | damages incurred by the Owner for rental expenses, for losses of use, income, profit, financing, business and reputation, and for loss of management or employee productivity or of the services of such persons; and | ||
.2 | damages incurred by the Contractor for principal office expenses including the compensation of personnel stationed there, for losses of financing, business and reputation, and for loss of profit except anticipated profit arising directly from the Work. |
Page 26 of 50
Page 27 of 50
Page 28 of 50
.1 | assignment is effective only after termination of the Contract by the Owner with or without cause pursuant to Article 14 and only for those subcontract agreements which the Owner accepts by notifying the Subcontractor and Contractor in writing (Owner will be responsible for any payments due for Work performed after termination of the Contract under any subcontract agreements that are so accepted by Owner); and | ||
.2 | assignment is subject to the prior rights of the surety, if any, obligated under bond relating to the Contract. |
Page 29 of 50
.1 | change in the Work; | ||
.2 | the amount of the adjustment, if any, in the Contract Sum; and | ||
.3 | the extent of the adjustment, if any, in the Contract Time. |
Page 30 of 50
.1 | mutual acceptance of a lump sum properly itemized and supported by sufficient substantiating data to permit evaluation; | ||
.2 | unit prices stated in the Contract Documents or subsequently agreed upon; | ||
.3 | cost to be determined in a manner agreed upon by the parties and a mutually acceptable fixed or percentage fee; or | ||
.4 | as provided in Section 7.3.6. |
.1 | costs of labor, including social security, old age and unemployment insurance, fringe benefits required by agreement or custom, and workers compensation insurance; |
Page 31 of 50
.2 | costs of materials, supplies and equipment, including cost of transportation, whether incorporated or consumed; | ||
.3 | rental costs of machinery and equipment, exclusive of hand tools, whether rented from the Contractor or others; | ||
.4 | costs of premiums for all bonds and insurance, permit fees, and sales, use or similar taxes related to the Work; and | ||
.5 | additional costs of supervision and field office personnel directly attributable to the change. |
Page 32 of 50
Page 33 of 50
Page 34 of 50
.1 | Work not in accordance with the Contract Documents; | ||
.2 | third party claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of such claims unless security acceptable to the Owner is provided by the Contractor; | ||
.3 | failure of the Contractor to make payments properly to Subcontractors or for labor, materials or equipment or to provide invoices, signed releases and lien waivers; | ||
.4 | reasonable evidence that the Work cannot be completed for the unpaid balance of the Contract Sum; | ||
.5 | damage to the Owner or another contractor; | ||
.6 | reasonable evidence that the Work will not be completed within the Contract Time, and that the unpaid balance would not be adequate to cover actual or liquidated damages for the anticipated delay; | ||
.7 | failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents; or | ||
.8 | Contractor has failed to perform any of its material obligations under the Contract Documents. | ||
.9 | Failure of the Contractor to submit with each application for payment evidence that all inspections necessary to issue Warranties required pursuant to the Contract Documents have been made. | ||
.10 | Failure of the Contractor to comply in any way with the requirements set forth herein for any Application for Payment. |
Page 35 of 50
Page 36 of 50
Page 37 of 50
Page 38 of 50
Page 39 of 50
.1 | liens, Claims, security interests or encumbrances arising out of the Contract and unsettled; | ||
.2 | failure of the Work to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents, including latent defects; | ||
.3 | terms of warranties required by the Contract Documents; or | ||
.4 | all of Contractors indemnity and defense obligations and all other obligations that survive completion of the Work. |
Page 40 of 50
.1 | employees on the Work and other persons who may be affected thereby; | ||
.2 | the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on or off the site, under care, custody or control of the Contractor or the Contractors Subcontractors or Sub-subcontractors; and | ||
.3 | other property at the site or adjacent thereto, such as trees, shrubs, lawns, walks, pavements, roadways, structures and utilities not designated for removal, relocation or replacement in the course of construction. |
Page 41 of 50
Page 42 of 50
Page 43 of 50
Page 44 of 50
Page 45 of 50
Page 46 of 50
.1 | Before Substantial Completion. As to acts or failures to act occurring prior to the relevant date of Substantial Completion, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than such date of Substantial Completion; | ||
.2 | Between Substantial Completion and Final Certificate for Payment. As to acts or failures to act occurring subsequent to the relevant date of Substantial Completion and prior to issuance of the final Certificate for Payment, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than the date of issuance of the final Certificate for Payment; and | ||
.3 | After Final Certificate for Payment. As to acts or failures to act occurring after the relevant date of issuance of the final Certificate for Payment, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than the date of any act or failure to act by the Contractor pursuant to any Warranty provided under Section 3.5, the date of any correction of the Work or failure to correct the Work by the Contractor under Section 12.2, or the date of actual commission of any other act or failure to perform any duty or obligation by the Contractor or Owner, whichever occurs last. |
.1 | issuance of an order of a court or other public authority having jurisdiction which requires all Work to be stopped; |
Page 47 of 50
.2 | an act of government, such as a declaration of national emergency which requires all Work to be stopped; or | ||
.3 | because the Owner has not made payment on a Certificate for Payment within the time stated in the Contract Documents; provided, however, if Owner is disputing the payment in good faith, Contractor shall not have the right to terminate the Contract for nonpayment. If such a dispute is resolved and Owner fails to make the payment in the manner agreed to by the parties in the resolution, Contractor shall have the right to terminate the Contract for nonpayment as set forth herein. | ||
.4 | the Owner has failed to furnish to the Contractor promptly, upon the Contractors request, reasonable evidence as required by Section 2.2.1. |
.1 | refuses or fails to supply enough properly skilled workers or proper materials except in cases where an extension of time is provided under the Contract Documents; | ||
.2 | fails to make payment to Subcontractors for materials or labor in accordance with the respective agreements between the Contractor and the Subcontractors; | ||
.3 | disregards any material laws, ordinances, or rules, regulations or orders of a public authority having jurisdiction; | ||
.4 | otherwise fails to comply with a material provision of the Contract Documents; | ||
.5 | if Contractor should be adjudged bankrupt, file or suffer to be filed a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Act, or make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or | ||
.6 | if a receiver should be appointed on account of Contractors insolvency. |
.1 | take possession of the site and of all materials, equipment, tools, and construction equipment and machinery thereon owned by the Contractor; |
Page 48 of 50
.2 | accept assignment of subcontracts pursuant to Article 5 herein; and | ||
.3 | finish the Work by whatever reasonable method the Owner may deem expedient including requiring that Contractors surety within 30 days of the written notice described herein, immediately proceed with completion of the Work. Upon request of the Contractor, the Owner shall furnish to the Contractor a detailed accounting of the costs incurred by the Owner in finishing the Work. |
.1 | that performance is, was or would have been so suspended, delayed or interrupted by another cause for which the Contractor is responsible; or | ||
.2 | that an equitable adjustment is made or denied under another provision of the Contract. |
.1 | cease operations as directed by the Owner in the notice vacate the site and remove all of Contractors equipment and materials; | ||
.2 | take actions necessary, or that the Owner may direct, for the protection and preservation of the Work; and | ||
.3 | except for Work directed to be performed prior to the effective date of termination stated in the notice, and except for subcontracts to be assigned to Owner pursuant to Article 5 herein, terminate all existing subcontracts and purchase orders and enter into no further subcontracts and purchase orders. |
Page 49 of 50
Page 50 of 50
PAGE | ||||
ARTICLE 1 THE LOAN
|
1 | |||
|
||||
1.1. General Information and Exhibits
|
1 | |||
1.2. Purpose
|
1 | |||
1.3. Commitment to Lend
|
1 | |||
1.4. Budget
|
1 | |||
1.5. Borrowers Deposit
|
2 | |||
1.6. Evidence of Debt
|
2 | |||
1.7. Interest Rate
|
2 | |||
1.8. Past Due Rate
|
3 | |||
1.9. Prepayment
|
3 | |||
1.10. Consequential Loss
|
3 | |||
1.11. Late Charge
|
4 | |||
1.12. Taxes
|
4 | |||
1.13. Payment Schedule and Maturity Date
|
5 | |||
1.14. Advances and Payments
|
7 | |||
1.15. Administrative Agent Advances
|
7 | |||
1.16. Defaulting Lender
|
9 | |||
1.17. Several Obligations; No Liability, No Release
|
10 | |||
|
||||
ARTICLE 2 ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
|
12 | |||
|
||||
2.1. Construction of the Improvements
|
12 | |||
2.2. Plans and Changes
|
12 | |||
2.3. Contracts
|
12 | |||
2.4. Assignment of Contracts and Plans
|
13 | |||
2.5. Storage of Materials
|
13 | |||
2.6. Construction Consultant
|
13 | |||
2.7. Inspection
|
14 | |||
2.8. Notice to Lenders
|
14 | |||
2.9. Financial Statements
|
14 | |||
2.10. Other Information
|
14 | |||
2.11. Reports and Testing
|
14 | |||
2.12. Advertising by Lenders
|
15 | |||
2.13. Appraisal
|
15 | |||
2.14. Payment of Withholding Taxes
|
15 | |||
2.15 ERISA and Prohibited Transaction Taxes
|
15 | |||
|
||||
ARTICLE 3 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
|
16 | |||
|
||||
ARTICLE 4 DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
|
17 | |||
|
||||
4.1. Events of Default
|
17 | |||
4.2. Remedies
|
18 | |||
|
||||
ARTICLE 5 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
|
19 | |||
|
||||
5.1. Appointment and Authorization of Administrative Agent
|
19 | |||
5.2. Delegation of Duties
|
20 | |||
5.3. Liability of Administrative Agent
|
20 | |||
5.4. Reliance by Administrative Agent
|
21 | |||
5.5. Notice of Default
|
21 | |||
5.6. Credit Decision; Disclosure of Information by Administrative Agent
|
21 | |||
5.7. Indemnification of Administrative Agent
|
22 | |||
5.8. Administrative Agent in Individual Capacity
|
22 |
PAGE | ||||
5.9. Successor Administrative Agent
|
22 | |||
5.10. Releases; Acquisition and Transfers of Collateral
|
23 | |||
5.11. Application of Payments
|
24 | |||
5.12. Benefit
|
24 | |||
|
||||
ARTICLE 6 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
24 | |||
|
||||
6.1. Consents; Borrowers Indemnity
|
24 | |||
6.2. Miscellaneous
|
26 | |||
6.3. Notices
|
26 | |||
6.4. Payments Set Aside
|
27 | |||
6.5. Successors and Assigns
|
27 | |||
6.6. Confidentiality
|
29 | |||
6.7. Set-off
|
30 | |||
6.8. Sharing of Payments
|
30 | |||
6.9. Amendments; Survival
|
30 | |||
6.10. Costs and Expenses
|
32 | |||
6.11. Tax Forms
|
32 | |||
6.12. Further Assurances
|
33 | |||
6.13. Inducement to Lenders
|
34 | |||
6.14. Forum
|
34 | |||
6.15. Interpretation
|
34 | |||
6.16. No Partnership, etc.
|
34 | |||
6.17. Records
|
34 | |||
6.18. Commercial Purpose
|
34 | |||
6.19. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
|
35 | |||
6.20. Service of Process
|
35 | |||
6.21. USA Patriot Act Notice
|
35 | |||
6.22. Entire Agreement
|
35 | |||
6.23. Dispute Resolution
|
35 |
EXHIBIT A
|
| Legal Description of Land | ||
EXHIBIT B
|
| Definitions and Financial Statements | ||
EXHIBIT C
|
| Conditions Precedent to the Initial Advance | ||
EXHIBIT D
|
| Budget | ||
EXHIBIT E
|
| Plans | ||
EXHIBIT F
|
| Advances | ||
EXHIBIT F-1
|
| Draw Request | ||
EXHIBIT G
|
| Survey Requirements | ||
EXHIBIT H
|
| Intentionally Omitted | ||
EXHIBIT I
|
| Leasing and Tenant Matters | ||
EXHIBIT J
|
| List of Required Bonds | ||
EXHIBIT K
|
| Letters of Credit | ||
EXHIBIT L
|
| Assignment and Assumption | ||
EXHIBIT M
|
| Promissory Note | ||
EXHIBIT N
|
| Schedule of Lenders and Other Parties |
X
|
Exhibit A | | Legal Description of the Land | |||
X
|
Exhibit B | | Definitions and Financial Statements | |||
X
|
Exhibit C | | Conditions Precedent to the Initial Advance | |||
X
|
Exhibit D | | Budget | |||
X
|
Exhibit E | | Plans | |||
X
|
Exhibit F | | Advances | |||
X
|
Exhibit F-1 | | Draw Request | |||
X
|
Exhibit G | | Survey Requirements | |||
|
Exhibit H | | Intentionally Omitted | |||
X
|
Exhibit I | | Leasing and Tenant Matters | |||
X
|
Exhibit J | | List of Required Bonds | |||
X
|
Exhibit K | | Letters of Credit | |||
X
|
Exhibit L | | Assignment and Assumption | |||
X
|
Exhibit M | | Promissory Note | |||
X
|
Exhibit N | | Schedule of Lenders |
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
WITNESS/ATTEST: | HF LOGISTICS-SKX T1, LLC, | |||||||
a Delaware limited liability company | ||||||||
|
||||||||
/s/ Mary S. Fredenburg | By: HF Logistics-SKX, LLC, a Delaware | |||||||
|
||||||||
Name: Mary S. Fredenburg | limited liability company, its sole member | |||||||
|
||||||||
By: HF Logistics I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its managing member | ||||||||
Borrowers Address for Notices:
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
HF Logistics-SKX T1, LLC
|
By: | /s/ Iddo Benzeevi | ||||||
|
||||||||
c/o Highland Fairview Properties
|
Iddo Benzeevi, President and | |||||||
14225 Corporate Way
|
Chief Executive Officer | |||||||
Moreno Valley CA 92553
|
||||||||
Telephone: (951) 867-5301
|
||||||||
Facsimile: (951) 867-5302
|
||||||||
Electronic Mail: [ILLEGIBLE].com
|
||||||||
FEIN: 27-1865350
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
With a copy to:
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
TG Services, Inc.
|
||||||||
Stage Coach Run
|
||||||||
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
|
||||||||
Attn: James Licb, EVP
|
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., | ||||||
a national banking association, individually as | ||||||
WITNESS/ATTEST: | Administrative Agent, L/C Issuer, and a Lender | |||||
|
||||||
/s/ Xavier Arcentales
|
By: | /s/ [ILLEGIBLE] | ||||
|
||||||
Name: Xavier Arcentales
|
Name: | [ILLEGIBLE] | ||||
|
Title: | Senior Vice President | ||||
|
||||||
RAYMOND JAMES BANK, FSB. | ||||||
WITNESS/ATTEST: | as a Lender | |||||
|
||||||
/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
|
By: | /s/ Jennifer Ehrhart | ||||
|
||||||
Name: [ILLEGIBLE]
|
Name: | Jennifer Ehrhart | ||||
|
Title: | Senior Vice President |
1. | DEFINITIONS : As used in this Agreement and the attached exhibits, the following terms shall have the following meanings: |
$ Per Sq. Ft. | % of | $ Per Sq. Ft. | ||||||||||||||||||
LINE ITEMS | of Land Area | Total Costs | of Bldg Area | $ Per Unit | Total Costs | |||||||||||||||
LAND
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Land Acquisition (Cost)
|
5.00 | 14.4 | % | 9.40 | 0 | 17,120,000.00 | ||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
SUB-TOTAL LAND
|
5.00 | 14.4 | % | 9.40 | | 17,120,000.00 | ||||||||||||||
HARD COSTS
|
||||||||||||||||||||
GC Contract (Prime Contract)
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
GC Contract (Eucalyptus St. Costs)
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
Pre-Purchased Items (paid by Borrower equity)
|
1.2 | % | 0.78 | 0 | 1,413,114.00 | |||||||||||||||
Borrowers General Conditions
|
0.2 | % | 0.13 | 0 | 233,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Previous Site Prep (already paid by Borrower)
|
0.4 | % | 0.24 | 0 | 429,149.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Hard Costs Contingency
|
[*] | % | [*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
SUB-TOTAL HARD COSTS
|
[*] | % | [*] | | [*] | |||||||||||||||
SOFT COSTS
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Architectural, Engineering and Other Consultants
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
Government Fees
|
2.6 | % | 1.68 | 0 | 3,058,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Construction Sureties
|
0.3 | % | 0.19 | 0 | 337,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Impact Fees
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
Insurance and Taxes
|
1.0 | % | 0.65 | 0 | 1,184,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Leasing Commissions
|
1.9 | % | 1.24 | 0 | 2,250,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Skechers Alternative Site Rental
|
0.8 | % | 0.55 | 0 | 1,000,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Entitlements
|
2.1 | % | 1.39 | 0 | 2,537,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Development Management Fee
|
0.6 | % | 0.42 | 0 | 761,924.00 | |||||||||||||||
Project and Construction Management
|
2.4 | % | 1.56 | 0 | 2,843,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Solar Facility
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
Closing/legal Costs
|
0.2 | % | 0.12 | 0 | 227,052.00 | |||||||||||||||
Site Grading and Other Cash Sureties
|
1.3 | % | 0.84 | 0 | 1,535,076.00 | |||||||||||||||
Additional Cash Collateral (CD)
|
4.6 | % | 3.02 | 0 | 5,500,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Fees
|
0.6 | % | 0.41 | 0 | 737,500.00 | |||||||||||||||
Developers Fee
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest Reserve
|
1.7 | % | 1.10 | 0 | 2,000,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Deficit
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Soft Cost Contingency
|
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
SUB-TOTAL SOFT COSTS
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL BUDGET
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY / OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS
|
TIMING | |||||||||||||||||||
Upfront Equity
|
Upfront | [*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | ||||||||||||||
Upfront Equity (contribution from HF Logistics SKX
T2)
|
Upfront | 0.1 | % | 0.08 | 0 | 150,000.00 | ||||||||||||||
Additional Cash Collateral (CD)
|
Not Equity | 4.6 | % | 3.02 | 0 | 5,500,000.00 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred Equity (Covered by Grant subject to Exhibit F
|
Deferred | 0.8 | % | 0.55 | 0 | 1,000,000.00 | ||||||||||||||
Section 2.(f) of the Loan Agreement)
|
0.0 | % | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
SUB-TOTAL EQUITY/OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS
|
[*] | % | [*] | 0 | [*] | |||||||||||||||
LOAN PROCEEDS
|
46.1 | % | 30.21 | 0 | 55,000,000.00 | |||||||||||||||
* | Confidential Portions Omitted and Filed Separately with the Commission. |
ARCHITECTURAL
|
||||||
A0.1
|
Highland Fairview Corporate Park Title Sheet ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A0.2
|
Highland Fairview Corporate Park General Sheet | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.1
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.2
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.3
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.1
|
Overall Site Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.2
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.3
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.4
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 4 | |||
A1.5
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 5 | |||
A1.6
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 6 | |||
A1.7
|
Pump House Plans | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.8
|
Enlarged Site Plan | 12/4/2008 | Delta 4 | |||
A2.1
|
Overall Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.2
|
Enlarged Floor Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.3
|
Enlarged Mezzanine Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A2.4
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.5
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.6
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.7
|
Enlarged Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
A2.8
|
Enlarged Restroom Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.9
|
Enlarged Restroom Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.10
|
Enlarged Stair Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.11
|
Reflected Ceiling Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.12
|
Reflected Ceiling Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A2.13
|
Reflected Ceiling Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
A2.14
|
Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A2.15
|
Enlarged Floor Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A2.16
|
Enlarged Roof Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.1
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.2
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.3
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.4
|
Elevations | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A3.5
|
Elevations ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A4.1
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A4.2
|
Wall Section ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A4.3
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A4.4
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A4.5
|
Wall Section | 5/21/2008 |
Project:
Hhighland Fairview Corporate Park
Trade:
General Contractor
ARCHITECTURAL CONTINUATION
Wall Section
5/21/2008
Wall Section
5/21/2008
Room Finish Schedule ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 3
Door Hardware Schedule
5/21/2008
Door Schedule
11/11/2008
Delta 2
Room Finish Legend ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 2
First Floor Office Finish Plan ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 2
Mezzanine Finish Plan ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 2
Finish Plan @ Warehouse
5/21/2008
Interior Elevations ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 2
Interior Elevations ASI #3
11/11/2008
Delta 3
Interior Elevations ASI #4
11/11/2008
Delta 4
Interior Elevations
5/21/2008
Interior Elevations
5/21/2008
Interior Elevations ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 2
Not Used
Interior Elevations
5/21/2008
Interior Elevations
5/21/2008
Interior Elevations
5/21/2008
Details
5/21/2008
Site Details for ADA Access
12/4/2009
Delta 4
Details
5/21/2008
Details ASI #1
9/15/2008
Delta 1
Details ASI #3
12/30/2008
Delta 5
Details
5/21/2008
Details
5/21/2008
Details
5/21/2008
Details
5/21/2008
Details
5/21/2008
Details
5/21/2008
Details ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 2
Details ASI #2
11/11/2008
Delta 2
EGRESS PLAN
Title Layout Egress Plan West Section
12/10/2008
Rev. 05
Title Layout Egress Plan Center Section Mezzanine Level
12/10/2008
Rev. 05
Title Layout Egress Plan Center Section Floor Level
12/10/2008
Rev. 05
Title Layout Egress Plan East Section
12/10/2008
Rev. 05
Floor Level Restrooms / Mezzanine Level Restrooms
12/10/2008
STRUCTURAL
Foundation Plan ASI #4
1/28/2009
(Delta 6)
Foundation Plan ASI #4
1/28/2009
(Delta 6)
Foundation Plan ASI #4
1/28/2009
(Delta 6)
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan ASI #4
1/28/2009
(Delta 6)
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan
7/25/2008
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan
7/25/2008
STRUCTURAL CONTINUATION
|
||||||
S7
|
Partial Enlarged Foundation Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S8
|
Mezzanine Floor Framing Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
S9
|
Partial Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S10
|
Partial Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S11
|
Partial Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S12
|
Roof Information | 7/25/2008 | ||||
S13
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S14
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S15
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
S15A
|
Curtain Wall Framing Plan | 7/25/2008 | ||||
S16
|
Partial Enlarged Roof Framing Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S17
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S18
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/16/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S19
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/17/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S20
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
S21
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S22
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S23
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S24
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S25
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S26
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S27
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S28
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S29
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S30
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S31
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S32
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S33
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S34
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S35
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S36
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S37
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S38
|
Panel Elevation ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
S39
|
Panel Elevation | 7/25/2008 | ||||
S40
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
S41
|
Panel Elevation ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
SD1
|
General Notes | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD1A
|
Special Inspections | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD2
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
SD3
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD4
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD5
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD6
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD7
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD8
|
Construction Details ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Detail 6 |
STRUCTURAL CONTINUATION
|
||||||
SD9
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD10
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD11
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD12
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD13
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD14
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD15
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD16
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD17
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD18
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Detail 2 | |||
SD19
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD20
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD21
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SD22
|
Construction Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
SD23
|
Construction Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
SD24
|
Construction Details ASI #3 | 12/30/2008 | Delta 5 | |||
SPH1
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SPH2
|
Construction Details | 7/25/2008 | ||||
SPH3
|
General Notes | 7/25/2008 | ||||
MECHANICAL
|
||||||
M-0.0
|
Title Sheet | 11/14/2008 | ||||
M-0.1
|
Title 24 | 11/14/2008 | ||||
M-1
|
Schedules & Notes | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-1.1
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-2
|
Partial Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-3
|
Partial Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-4
|
Partial Floor Plan ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-5
|
Mezzanine Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/13/2008 | Delta 3 | |||
M-6
|
Partial Floor Plan ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-7
|
Partial Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-8
|
Partial Roof Plan ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
M-9
|
Details | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
M-10
|
Controls ASI #4 | 1/21/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
PLUMBING
|
||||||
P-1
|
Specifications & Calculations ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-2
|
Overall Site Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-2.1
|
Partial Site Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-2.2
|
Partial Site Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-3
|
Partial Floor, Roof Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-4
|
Partial Floor, Roof Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-5
|
Partial Floor, Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-6
|
Restroom Details ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
P-7
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-8
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-9
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 |
PLUMBING CONTINUATION
|
||||||
P-10
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-11
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-12
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-13
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-14
|
Restroom Details | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-15
|
Waste & Vent Isometrics | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-16
|
Hot & Cold Water Isometrics | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
P-17
|
Plumbing Details ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
ELECTRICAL
|
||||||
EO.1
|
Specifications, Symbols & Abbreviations | 11/14/2008 | ||||
EO.2
|
Outdoor Title 24 ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
EO.3
|
Indoor Title 24 ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E1.1A
|
Partial Site Electrical Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E1.1B
|
Partial Site Electrical Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E1.2A
|
Partial Site Lighting Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E1.2B
|
Partial Site Lighting Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E1.2C
|
Partial Site Photometric Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E1.2D
|
Partial Site Photometric Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E2.1
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E2.2
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E2.3
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E2.4
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E2.5
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E2.6
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E2.7
|
Single Line Diagram ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E3.1
|
Warehouse Electrical Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E3.2
|
Warehouse Underground Conduit Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E3.3
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.4
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.5
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.6
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.7
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E3.8
|
Partial Warehouse Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E4
|
Warehouse Electrical Roof Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
E5.1
|
Enlarged Main Office Ground Floor Lighting Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E5.2
|
Enlarged Main Office Second Floor Lighting Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E5.3
|
Enlarged Warehouse Office Lighting Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E6.1
|
Enlarged Main Office Ground Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E6.2
|
Enlarged Main Office Second Floor Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E6.3
|
Enlarged Main Office Roof Plan ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E6.4
|
Enlarged Warehouse Office Power Plan ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E6.5
|
Enlarged Dock Door Power Plans ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E7
|
Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E8.1
|
Wiring Diagram ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E8.2
|
Wiring Diagram & Fixture Schedule ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 |
ELECTRICAL CONTINUED
|
||||||
E8.3
|
Wiring Diagrams ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E8.4
|
Wiring Diagrams ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
E9
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E10
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E11
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E12
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E13
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
E14
|
Schedules ASI #4 | 1/28/2009 | Delta 6 | |||
EFP1
|
Fire Pump House Plan | 11/14/2008 | ||||
FIRE PROTECTION PARCEL 1 / SKECHERS
|
||||||
HFCP
|
Cover Page | |||||
FP 1
|
Underground Fire Master Plan | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 2
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part I | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 3
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part II | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 4
|
Underground Fire Notes / Details | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 5
|
Diesel Fire Pump Plans & Details | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 6
|
Overhead Master Plan Area A (reference only) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 7
|
Overhead Master Plan Area B (reference only) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 8
|
Overhead Master Plan Area C (reference only) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 9
|
System 1 4 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 10
|
System 5 9 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 11
|
System 10 14 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 12
|
System 15 19 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 13
|
System 20 24 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 14
|
System 25 29 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 15
|
System 30 34 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 16
|
System 35 39 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 17
|
System 40 44 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 18
|
System 45 48 Overhead Piping Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 19
|
Building Section & Maximum Storage Heights | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 20
|
Overhead Sprinkler Layout Notes | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 21
|
1st Floor Room Coverage Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 22
|
Mezzanine Piping Plan & Details | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 23
|
2 Second Floor Room Coverage Plan | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 24
|
2 Second Floor Piping Enlarged | 2/12/2009 | ||||
FP 25
|
Warehouse Office Room Coverage Plans & Piping Enlargements | 2/12/2009 | ||||
SR 60 CONSTRUCTION STAGING PLAN
|
||||||
SC 1
|
Stage Construction | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TH 01
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TH 02
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TH 03
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 4/9/2010 |
REDLANDS BLVD. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
|
||||||
TCP 1
|
Traffic Control Plan Title Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 2
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I & II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 3
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 4
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 5
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 6
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
ROUGH GRADING
|
||||||
RGP 1
|
Rough Grading Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 2
|
Rough Grading Plan Detail Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 3
|
Rough Grading Plan Detail Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 4
|
Rough Grading Plan Detail Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 5
|
Rough Grading Plan Storm Drain Profiles | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 6
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 7
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 8
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 9
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 10
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 11
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 12
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 13
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 14
|
Rough Grading Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 15
|
Rough Grading Plan Erosion Control | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 16
|
Rough Grading Plan Erosion Control | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 17
|
Rough Grading Plan Noise Reduction Compliance Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 18
|
Rough Grading Plan Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 19
|
Rough Grading Plan Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
PRECISE GRADING
|
||||||
PG 1
|
Precise Grading Title Sheet | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 2
|
Precise Grading Detail Sheet | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 3
|
Precise Grading Detail Sheet | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 4
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 5
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 6
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 7
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 8
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 9
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 10
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 11
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 12
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 13
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 14
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 15
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 16
|
Precise Grading Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 17
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 18
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 |
PRECISE GRADING CONTINUED
|
||||||
PG 19
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 20
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 21
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 22
|
Erosion Control Plan | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 23
|
Conditions of Approval | 4/12/2010 | ||||
PG 24
|
Conditions of Approval | 4/12/2010 | ||||
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PLAN ROUGH GRADING
|
||||||
EPP 1
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 2
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 3
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 4
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EPP 5
|
Encroachment Permit Plan Rough Grading Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
ROUGH GRADING REDLANDS SEWER
|
||||||
RGP 1
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 2
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Drainage | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 3
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Drainage | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 4
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Drainage | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 5
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Erosion Control | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 6
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 7
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 8
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 9
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 10
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 11
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 12
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RGP 13
|
Rough grading Plan Redlands Sewer Condtions of Aproval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
CALTRANS EROSION CONTROL PLAN
|
||||||
EC 5
|
EROSION CONTROL WPCD | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TEMPORARY STORM DRAIN SYSTEM PHASE 1
|
||||||
TDD 1
|
Phase 1 Temporary Drainage Ditch | 2/18/2009 | ||||
GRADING CROSS SECTIONS
|
||||||
GCS 1
|
Grading Cross Sections | 2/18/2009 | ||||
GCS 2
|
Grading Cross Sections | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SITE FIRE ACCESS PLAN
|
||||||
FPS 1
|
Site Fire Access Plan (During Construction) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FPS 2
|
Site Fire Access Plan (Job Completion) | 7/29/2008 | ||||
PARCEL 1 WALL & FENCE TILT-UP WALL
|
||||||
LCS-0
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Cover Sheet | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LR-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Reference Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-07
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 |
PARCEL 1 WALL & FENCE TILT-UP WALL CONTINUED
|
||||||
LW-08
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-09
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-10
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-11
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LW-12
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Plan | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Notes | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-07
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-08
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-09
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-10
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-11
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-12
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Tilt-Up Wall Elevations | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-13
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LWD-14
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-15
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-16
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-17
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-18
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-19
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWD-20
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Details | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LWN-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Wall & Fence Construction Specifications | 3/30/2010 | ||||
LINE F STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Moreno MDP Line F Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Moreno MDP Line F Notes & Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 95+20 to 97+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 97+-00 to 103+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 103+00 to 110+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 6
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 110+00 to 118+05 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 7
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 118+05 to 122+56.73 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 8
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station 122+56.73 to 124+42.37 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 9
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-2 10+00 to 11+49.18 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 10
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-2-A 10+00 to 11+41.56 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 11
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat D-5 10+00 to 11+52.91 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 12
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat D-6 10+00 to 14+68.98 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 13
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 0+25.13 to 8+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 14
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 8+00 to 16+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 15
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 16+00 to 24+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 16
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 24+00 to 31+50 | 4/9/2010 |
LINE F STORM DRAIN SYSTEM CONTINUED
|
||||||
SHT 17
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 10+00 to 12+00.25 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 18
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-9 11+02.55 to 18+00 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 19
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-9 18+00 to 25+65.60 | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 20
|
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 21
|
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 22
|
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 23
|
Moreno MDP Line F Outlet, Access Raod & Basin | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 24
|
Moreno MDP Line F General Notes & typ Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 25
|
Moreno MDP Line F Typ Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 26
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lateral & Sections | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 27
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lateral | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 28
|
Moreno MDP Line F Access Opening Sections & typ Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SHT 29
|
Moreno MDP Line F typ Sections & Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
REDLANDS SANITARY SEWER
|
||||||
SWP 1
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SWP 2
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan Index & Legends | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SWP 3
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SWP 4
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SWP 5
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SWP 6
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SWP 7
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SWP 8
|
Redlands Blvd Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS SANITARY SEWER PLAN
|
||||||
SSIP 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Index & Legend | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 5
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 6
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 7
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
LOGISTIC BUILDING SEWER AND WATER
|
||||||
SSIP 1
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 2
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan Notes & Quantities | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 3
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 4
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 5
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 6
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 7
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SSIP 8
|
Logistics Bldg Sewer & Water Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EUCALPTUS RECYCLED WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
RWIP 1
|
Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RWIP 2
|
Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RWIP 3
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RWIP 4
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RWIP 5
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RWIP 6
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
RWIP 7
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 |
EUCALYPTUS WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
DW 1
|
Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 2
|
Index Map & Legend | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 3
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 4
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 5
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 6
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 7
|
Plan Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DW 8
|
Line A thru D profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
Off-Site (Sinclair) DOMESTIC WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
DWIP 1
|
Domestic Water Plans title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 2
|
Domestic Water Plans Index Map & Legends | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 3
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 4
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 5
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 6
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 7
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 8
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 9
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 10
|
Domestic Water Plans & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
REDLANDS WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
DWIP 1
|
Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 2
|
Index Map | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 3
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
DWIP 4
|
Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION PLAN
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
REDLANDS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION PLAN
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Electrical Distribution Plan BUTSKO | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SKECHERS ONSITE ELECTRIC
|
||||||
SWP 1
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SWP 2
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SWP 3
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
SWP 4
|
TPM 35629 Onsite Utilities Butsko | 3/4/2010 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
STIP 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Notes & Index Map | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Details & Sections | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 5
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 |
EUCALYPTUS STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN CONTINUED
|
||||||
STIP 6
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 7
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 8
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 9
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 10
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 11
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Signing & Striping Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 12
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Signing & Striping Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 13
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 14
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
SCE EXHIBIT - JACK & BORE SCE CONDUIT
|
||||||
SCE-J&B
|
Jack & Bore Exhibit SE Conduit Under SR60 | 8/25/2009 | ||||
SCE-Pole
|
Cross Section B-B (SCE Pole No. 4001945E) | 8/25/2009 | ||||
SCE-Pole
|
Cross Section A-A (SCE Pole No. 214347/T2964 | 8/25/2009 | ||||
MEDIAN EXHIBIT
|
||||||
E-1
|
Exhibit Sections Eucalyptus Street Median | 7/22/2009 | ||||
TOLERANCE EXHIBIT
|
||||||
TE
|
Tolerance Exhibit | 2/18/2009 | ||||
THEODORE STREET
IMPROVEMENT PLAN (THEODORE RAMP IMPROVEMENT PLANS)
|
||||||
STIP 1
|
Theodore Street Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 2
|
Theodore Street Notes & Index Map Typical Sections | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 3
|
Theodore Street Improvement Plans | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 4
|
Theodore Street Construction Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 5
|
Theodore Street Construction Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 6
|
Theodore Street Grading-Drainage-Utility Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 7
|
Theodore Street W.P.C.P | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 8
|
Theodore Street Signing and Striping Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 9
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling Details | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 10
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 11
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 12
|
Theodore Street Traffic Handling | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 13
|
Theodore Street Detour Plan | 4/9/2010 | ||||
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT
|
||||||
421
|
Traffic Signal Interconnect Detail | 1/1/2008 | ||||
EVTSI
|
Emergency Vehicle & Traffic Signal Interconnect | 10/22/2009 | ||||
THEODORE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
STIP 1
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Title Sheet | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 2
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Construction Notes | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 3
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Typical Street Sections | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 4
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 5
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Plan & Profile | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 6
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Signing and Striping | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 7
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 8
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
STIP 9
|
Theodore Street Phase 1 Conditions of Approval | 4/9/2010 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS STREET LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Eucalyptus Street Cover Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 |
EUCALYPTUS STREET LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION CONTINUED
|
||||||
SHT 3
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 6
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 7
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 8
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 9
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 10
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 11
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 12
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 13
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 14
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 15
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 16
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 17
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 18
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 19
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 20
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 21
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 22
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 23
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 24
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 25
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 26
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 27
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 28
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 29
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 30
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 31
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 32
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
HFCP ASSOCIATION LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||||
LCS-0
|
HFCP Association Cover Sheet | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-01
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-02
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-03
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-04
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-05
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-06
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-07
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-08
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-09
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-10
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-11
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-12
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 |
HFCP ASSOCIATION LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION CONTINUED
|
||||||
LI-13
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-14
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-15
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-16
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LI-17
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LID-1
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Details | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LID-2
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Details | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LIN-1
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Notes | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LIN-2
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Specifications | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LIN-3
|
HFCP Association Irrigation Specifications | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-01
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-02
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-03
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-04
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-05
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-06
|
HFCP Association - Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-07
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-08
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-09
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-10
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-11
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-12
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-13
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-14
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-15
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-16
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LP-17
|
HFCP Association Construction and Planting Plan | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LPD-01
|
HFCP Association Planting Details | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LPD-02
|
HFCP Association Planting Details | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LCD-01
|
HFCP Association Construction Specification | 3/22/2010 | ||||
LCD-02
|
HFCP Association Construction Details | 3/22/2010 | ||||
PARCEL 1 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||||
LCS-0
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Cover Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O1
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O2
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O3
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O4
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O5
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O6
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O7
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O8
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O9
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O10
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LC-O11
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Plan Enlargements | 2/18/2009 |
PARCEL 1 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION CONTINUATION
|
||||||
LCD-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCD-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LCN-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Construction Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-07
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-08
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-09
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LI-10
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LID-1
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LID-2
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LIN-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LIN-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LIN-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-03
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-04
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-05
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-06
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-07
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-08
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-09
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LP-10
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LPD-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LPD-02
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LPN-01
|
HFCP Parcel 1 Planting Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
WEI WEST WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT, INC.
|
||||||
SA00
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Overall Plan View | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA01
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA02
|
Structure Layout | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA03
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA04
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA05
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA06
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA07
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 |
WEI WEST WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT, INC. CONTINUED
|
||||||
SA08
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SA09
|
Structure Layout VAS Platform Footing Details | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB00
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Overall Plan View | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB01
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Overall Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB02
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Overall Enlarged Foundation Plan | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SB03
|
Structure Layout Shipping Platform Footing Detail | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG01
|
Structure Layout Extendable Conveyor Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG02
|
Structure Layout Extendable Conveyor Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG03
|
Structure Layout Extendable Footings Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG04
|
Structure Layout Extendable Footings Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG05
|
Structure Layout Extendable Footings Foundation Plans | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
SG06
|
Structure Layout Extendable Tracks Footing Cross Sections | 12/10/2008 | Rev. 05 | |||
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK PROJECT MANUAL
|
||||||
Div 00
|
Procurement and Contracting requirements | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 01
|
General requirements | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 02
|
Sitrework | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 03
|
Concrete | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 04
|
Masonry | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 05
|
Metals | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 06
|
Wood and Plastics | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 07
|
Thermal and Moisture Control | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 08
|
Doors and Windows | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 09
|
Finishes | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 10
|
Specialties | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 11
|
Equipment | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 12
|
Furnishings | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 13
|
Special Construction | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 14
|
Conveyor Systems | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 15
|
Mechanical | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 16
|
Electrical | 7/24/2008 | ||||
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC.
|
||||||
1.0
|
Introduction | 6/15/2007 | ||||
2.0
|
Geotechnical Investigation & Lab | 6/15/2007 | ||||
3.0
|
Summary | 6/15/2007 | ||||
4.0
|
Faulting & Seismicity | 6/15/2007 | ||||
5.0
|
Conclusions | 6/15/2007 | ||||
6.0
|
Preliminary Recommendations | 6/15/2007 | ||||
7.0
|
Geotechnical Review | 6/15/2007 | ||||
8.0
|
Limitations | 6/15/2007 | ||||
map
|
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log | 6/15/2007 | ||||
UPDATED PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC.
|
||||||
1.0
|
Introduction | 4/30/2008 | ||||
2.0
|
Geotechnical Investigation & Lab | 4/30/2008 | ||||
3.0
|
Summary | 4/30/2008 | ||||
4.0
|
Faulting & Seismicity | 4/30/2008 |
UPDATED PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC. CONTINUED
|
||||||
5.0
|
Conclusions | 4/30/2008 | ||||
6.0
|
Preliminary Recommendations | 4/30/2008 | ||||
7.0
|
Geotechnical Review | 4/30/2008 | ||||
8.0
|
Limitations | 4/30/2008 | ||||
map
|
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log | 4/30/2008 | ||||
OTHER SOILS REPORTS
|
||||||
|
Update Seismic Design Parameters | 11/30/2007 | ||||
|
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, SR-60 Widening | 7/30/2008 | ||||
|
Clarifications to Soils, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 8/15/2008 | ||||
|
response to City of M.V. Review Comments & Map | 11/5/2008 | ||||
|
geotechnical Recommendations for Temporary Fire Access Road | 1/5/2009 | ||||
|
Clarifications #2 to Soils Report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 1/14/2009 | ||||
|
Response to City of M.V. Review Comments, Public Works Depart. | 1/16/2009 | ||||
|
Geotechnical Review of Improvements & rough Grade for Sanitary Sewer | 1/21/2009 | ||||
|
Clarifications #3 to Soils report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 1/29/2009 | ||||
|
Rough Grading Anticipated Keyway Locations | 1/29/2009 | ||||
|
recommended Sup drain Locations | 2/6/2009 | ||||
|
Infiltration Characteristics of onsite soils | 6/23/2008 | ||||
|
Supplemental Remedial Grading Rec. Skechers VAS Platform | 2/6/2009 | ||||
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
|
||||||
|
Structural Calculations by David Kramer | 2/2/2009 | ||||
TITLE 24 REPORT
|
||||||
|
title 24 Report by Alan Poydock Thermalair, Inc. | 1/30/2009 | ||||
CIVIL MISC EXHIBITS & REPORTS
|
||||||
|
Drainage Bypass for Redlands Sewer Work Area | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Grading Balance Area | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Highland SWPPP | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Set Back for Restricted Hours of Work | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Existing Stockpile Locations | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Mitigation Monitoring Program by Michael Brandman Assoc. | 12/23/2008 | ||||
|
Septic Exhibit | 1/7/2009 |
ARCHITECTURAL
|
||||||
A0.1
|
Highland Fairview Corporate Park Title Sheet ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
A0.2
|
Highland Fairview Corporate Park General Sheet | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.1
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.2
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A0.3.3
|
Disability Access Notes | 5/21/2008 | ||||
A1.1
|
Overall Site Plan | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.1
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.1A
|
Site Details for ADA Access | 12/4/2009 | Delta 4 | |||
AD.2
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.3
|
Details ASI #1 | 9/15/2008 | Delta 1 | |||
AD.3A
|
Details ASI #3 | 12/30/2008 | (Delta 5) | |||
AD.4
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.5
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.6
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.7
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.8
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.9
|
Details | 5/21/2008 | ||||
AD.10
|
Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
AD.11
|
Details ASI #2 | 11/11/2008 | Delta 2 | |||
FIRE PROTECTION PARCEL 1 / SKECHERS
|
||||||
HFCP
|
Cover Page | |||||
FP 1
|
Underground Fire Master Plan | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 2
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part I | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 3
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part II | 7/29/2008 | ||||
FP 4
|
Underground Fire Notes / Details | 7/29/2008 | ||||
CONSTRUCTION STAGING PLAN
|
||||||
SC 1
|
Stage Construction | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SC 2
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SC 3
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SC 4
|
Traffic Handling / Construction area Sign Plan | 1/9/2009 | ||||
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
|
||||||
TCP 1
|
Traffic Control Plan Title Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 2
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I & II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 3
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 4
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase II | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 5
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase I | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TCP 6
|
Traffic Control Plan Phase II | 2/18/2009 |
PRECISE GRADING
|
||||||
PG 1
|
Precise Grading Title Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 2
|
Precise Grading Detail Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 3
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 4
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 5
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 6
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 7
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 8
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 9
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 10
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 11
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 12
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 13
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 14
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
PG 15
|
Precise Grading Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
LINE F STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Moreno MDP Line F Title Sheet | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Moreno MDP Line F Notes & Details | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 6
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 7
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 8
|
Moreno MDP Line F Station | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 9
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-2 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 10
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-2-A | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 11
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat D-5 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 12
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat D-6 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 13
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 14
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 15
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 16
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 17
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-8 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 18
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-9 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 19
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lat F-9 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 20
|
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 21
|
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 22
|
Moreno MDP Line F Profiles | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 23
|
Moreno MDP Line F Gen Notes & Details | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 24
|
Moreno MDP Line F Details | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 25
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lateral Plan Sections | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 26
|
Moreno MDP Line F Lateral | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 27
|
Moreno MDP Line F Sections | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 28
|
Moreno MDP Line F Access Openings & Details | 1/9/2009 | ||||
|
new spec and area of 6,00 psi concrete |
EUCALYPTUS SANITARY SEWER PLAN
|
||||||
SSIP 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Title Sheet | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SSIP 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Index & Legend | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SSIP 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SSIP 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SSIP 5
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SSIP 6
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SSIP 7
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Sanitary Sewer Plan Plan Profile | 1/9/2009 | ||||
RECYCLED WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
RWIP 1
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
RWIP 2
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
RWIP 3
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
RWIP 4
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
RWIP 5
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
RWIP 6
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
RWIP 7
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WIP 1
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WIP 2
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WIP 3
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WIP 4
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WIP 5
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WIP 6
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
WIP 7
|
EUCALYPTUS | 2/20/2009 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS SITE UTILITIES
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Utility Design BUTSKO | 1/9/2009 | ||||
SHT 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Temporary Transformer BUTSKO | 1/9/2009 | ||||
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION PLAN
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Electrical Distribution Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Electrical Distribution Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Electrical Distribution Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Electrical Distribution Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
FIRE PROTECTION SITE
|
||||||
FP 1 UG
|
Underground Fire Master Plan | 11/12/2008 | ||||
FP 2 UG
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part I | 3/3/2009 | ||||
FP 3 UG
|
Enlarged Underground Fire Piping Part II | 3/3/2009 | ||||
FP 1
|
Site Fire Access Plan (During Construction) | 3/3/2009 | ||||
FP 2
|
Site Fire Access Plan (Job Completion) | 3/3/2009 | ||||
EUCALYPTUS STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
STIP 1
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Title Sheet | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 2
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Notes & Index Map | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 3
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Details & Sections | 1/9/2009 |
EUCALYPTUS STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN CONTINUATION
|
||||||
STIP 4
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Phase 1 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 5
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Phase 2 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 6
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Phase 3 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 7
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Phase 4 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 8
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Phase 5 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 9
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Phase 6 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 10
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Street Improvement Plan Phase 7 | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 11
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Signing & Striping Title Sheet | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 12
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Signing & Striping | 1/9/2009 | ||||
STIP 13
|
Eucalyptus Avenue Signing & Striping | 1/9/2009 | ||||
PAVING SECTION
|
||||||
PS
|
PAVING SECTION EXHIBIT | 2/18/2009 | ||||
MEDIAN EXHIBIT
|
||||||
E-1
|
Exhibit Sections Eucalyptus Street Median | 7/22/2009 | ||||
110
|
Emergency Vehicle Median Access | 1/1/2005 | ||||
TOLERANCE EXHIBIT
|
||||||
TE
|
Tolerance Exhibit | 2/18/2009 | ||||
THEODORE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
TSE
|
Theodore Street Exhibit | 2/18/2009 | ||||
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT
|
||||||
421
|
Traffic Signal Interconnect Detail | 1/1/2008 | ||||
EVTSI
|
Emergency Vehicle & Traffic Signal Interconnect | 10/22/2009 | ||||
THEODORE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
|
||||||
|
Theodore Street / HWY 60 Ramp Widening Exhibit | |||||
EUCALYPTUS STREET LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION
|
||||||
SHT 1
|
Eucalyptus Street Cover Sheet | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 2
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 3
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 4
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 5
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 6
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 7
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 8
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 9
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 10
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 11
|
Eucalyptus Street Construction Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 12
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 13
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 14
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 15
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 16
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 17
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 18
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 19
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 20
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Notes | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 21
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Specifications | 2/18/2009 |
EUCALYPTUS STREET LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION CONTINUATION
|
||||||
SHT 22
|
Eucalyptus Street Irrigation Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 23
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 24
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 25
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 26
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 27
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 28
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Plan | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 29
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 30
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Details | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 31
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
SHT 32
|
Eucalyptus Street Planting Specifications | 2/18/2009 | ||||
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK PROJECT MANUAL
|
||||||
Div 00
|
Procurement and Contracting requirements | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 01
|
General requirements | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 02
|
Sitrework | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 03
|
Concrete | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 04
|
Masonry | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 05
|
Metals | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 06
|
Wood and Plastics | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 07
|
Thermal and Moisture Control | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 08
|
Doors and Windows | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 09
|
Finishes | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 10
|
Specialties | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 11
|
Equipment | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 12
|
Furnishings | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 13
|
Special Construction | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 14
|
Conveyor Systems | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 15
|
Mechanical | 7/24/2008 | ||||
Div 16
|
Electrical | 7/24/2008 | ||||
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC.
|
||||||
1.0
|
Introduction | 6/15/2007 | ||||
2.0
|
Geotechnical Investigation & Lab | 6/15/2007 | ||||
3.0
|
Summary | 6/15/2007 | ||||
4.0
|
Faulting & Seismicity | 6/15/2007 | ||||
5.0
|
Conclusions | 6/15/2007 | ||||
6.0
|
Preliminary Recommendations | 6/15/2007 | ||||
7.0
|
Geotechnical Review | 6/15/2007 | ||||
8.0
|
Limitations | 6/15/2007 | ||||
map
|
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log | 6/15/2007 | ||||
1.0
|
Introduction | 4/30/2008 | ||||
2.0
|
Geotechnical Investigation & Lab | 4/30/2008 | ||||
3.0
|
Summary | 4/30/2008 | ||||
4.0
|
Faulting & Seismicity | 4/30/2008 | ||||
5.0
|
Conclusions | 4/30/2008 | ||||
6.0
|
Preliminary Recommendations | 4/30/2008 |
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LEIGHTON & ASSOC. CONTINUATION
|
||||||
7.0
|
Geotechnical Review | 4/30/2008 | ||||
8.0
|
Limitations | 4/30/2008 | ||||
map
|
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log | 4/30/2008 | ||||
|
Update Seismic Design Parameters | 11/30/2007 | ||||
|
Update Geotechnical Report | 4/30/2008 | ||||
|
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, SR-60 Widening | 7/30/2008 | ||||
|
Clarifications to Soils, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 8/15/2008 | ||||
|
response to City of M.V. Review Comments & Map | 11/5/2008 | ||||
|
geotechnical Recommendations for Temporary Fire Access Road | 1/5/2009 | ||||
|
Clarifications #2 to Soils Report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 1/14/2009 | ||||
|
Response to City of M.V. Review Comments, Public Works Depart. | 1/16/2009 | ||||
|
Geotechnical Review of Improvements & rough Grade for Sanitary Sewer | 1/21/2009 | ||||
|
Clarifications #3 to Soils report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park | 1/29/2009 | ||||
|
Rough Grading Anticipated Keyway Locations | 1/29/2009 | ||||
|
recommended Sub drain Locations | 2/6/2009 | ||||
CIVIL MISC EXHIBITS & REPORTS
|
||||||
|
Drainage Bypass for Redlands Sewer Work Area | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Grading Balance Area | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Highland SWPPP | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Offsite Rubble Disposal | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Set Back for Restricted Hours of Work | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Supplemental SWPPP | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Water Pick-Up | 2/18/2009 | ||||
|
Mitigation Monitoring Program by Michael Brandman Assoc. | 12/23/2008 |
PROJECT MANUALS & REPORT
29800 Eucalyptus Avenue, Moreno Valley, California 92555
GEOTECHNICAL
Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Section 1.0 Introduction
Leighton and Associates, Inc.
Section 2.0 Geotechnical Investigation & Lab
Section 3.0 Summary
Section 4.0 Faulting & Seismicity
Section 5.0 Conclusions
Section 6.0 Preliminary Recommendations
Section 7.0 Geotechnical review
Section 8.0 Limitations
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log
Update Geotechnical report
Section 1.0 Introduction
Leighton and Associates, Inc.
Section 2.0 Geotechnical Investigation & Lab
Section 3.0 Summary
Section 4.0 Faulting & Seismicity
Section 5.0 Conclusions
Section 6.0 Preliminary Recommendations
Section 7.0 Geotechnical review
Section 8.0 Limitations
Geotechnical Map / Boring Log
11/30/2007
Update Seismic Design Parameters
4/30/2008
Update Geotechnical Report
7/30/2008
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, SR-60 Widening between Theodore & Redlands Blvd.
8/15/2008
Clarifications to Soils Report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park
11/5/2008
Response to City of Moreno Valley Review Comments & Map
1/5/2009
Geotechnical recommendations for Temporary All-Weather Fire Access
1/14/2009
Clarifications #2 to Soils Report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park
1/16/2009
Response to City of Moreno Valley Review Comments, Public Works Department
1/21/2009
Geotechnical review of Improvement & rough Grading Plans for Sanitary Sewer Redlands Blvd.
1/29/2009
Clarifications #3 to Soils Report, Highland Fairview Corporate Park
1/29/2009
Rough Grading Anticipated Keyway Locations
2/6/2009
Recommended Subdrain Locations
PROJECT MANUAL
Highland Corporate Park
Project Requirements & Specifications
HPA, Inc. Architects
Division 00 Procurement & Contracting
Division 01 General Requirements
Division 02 Sitework
Division 03 Concrete
Division 04 Masonry
Division 05 Metals
Division 06 Wood & Plastics
Division 07 Thermal & Moisture Control
Division 08 Doors & Windows
Division 09 Finishes
Division 10 Specialties
Division 11 Equipment
Division 12 Furnishings
Division 13 Special Construction
Division 14 Conveying Systems
Division 15 Design build
Division 16 Design Build
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
Structural Clculations by David Robert Kramer
TITLE 24 REPORT
title 24 Report by Alan Poydock termalair, Inc.
CIVIL MISC. EXHIBITS & REPORTS
Drainage Bypass for Redlands Sewer Work Area
Grading Balance Area
Highland SWPPP
Offsite Rubble Disposal
Set Back for Restricted Hours of Work
Existing Stockpile Locations
Supplemental SWPPP
Water Pick-Up
12/23/2008
Mitigation Monitoring Program by Michael Brandman Associates
Septic Exhibit
Final Fire Access Plan
Temporary Fire Access Plan
(1) | In the event Borrower submits a Draw Request to Administrative Agent containing a Street Project Advance at any time from the date hereof until that date which is six (6) months from the date hereof (such period being referred to herein as the Initial Six Months ), Borrower shall, within five (5) business days of receiving such Street Project Advance, (A) pay such Street Project Advance to Borrowers contractor; (B) submit a request to the City for a portion of the Grant Money in an amount equal to the amount of the Street Project Advance contained in its Draw Request and paid to Borrowers contractor; and (C) provide Administrative Agent |
with written evidence acceptable to Administrative Agent of its satisfaction of the requirements set forth in (A) and (B) above; | |||
(2) | Following Borrowers receipt from the City of a portion of the Grant Money in response to its request for same (a Grant Advance ), Borrower shall provide written notice of its receipt of such Grant Advance to Administrative Agent and confirm, with evidence acceptable to Administrative Agent, the amount of such Grant Advance; | ||
(3) | In its first Draw Request following the receipt of a Grant Advance, Borrower shall include a line item for the amount of such Grant Advance which amount shall be subtracted from (i) the total amount of such Draw Request; and (ii) the line item in the Budget used for Street Project Advances. For illustration purposes only, if Borrower submits a Draw Request for $1,000,000 of Loan Proceeds which contains a Street Project Advance of $250,000, Borrower shall simultaneously submit a request for Grant Money in the amount of $250,000 to the City and provide Administrative Agent with copies of such request for Grant Money together with its Draw Request for $1,000,000 of Loan Proceeds. Should Borrower receive Grant Money from the City in response to its request for same, Borrower shall provide Administrative Agent with written notice of same together with evidence thereof and in its next following Draw Request, Borrower will include the amount of such Grant Advance as an amount to be subtracted from the total amount of Loan Proceeds requested in such following Draw Request and from the line item in the Budget used for Street Project Advances. | ||
(4) | In the event that Borrower does not receive the entire amount of Grant Money during the Initial Six Months, within two (2) business days of the expiration of the Initial Six Months, Borrower shall deposit into the Upfront Equity Account an amount equal to ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) less the total sum of all Grant Advances which have been received by Borrower and deducted from subsequent Draw Requests pursuant to the procedure set forth in subsection (3) above. | ||
(5) | Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) of Loan Proceeds will be held back and remain undisbursed within the line item in the Budget used for Street Project Advances until the earlier to occur of (i) the disbursement to Borrower of all of the Grant Money and confirmation by Administrative Agent that an amount equal to all of the Grant Money (i.e., $1,000,000) has been deducted from Draw Requests in the manner described above in this Section f ; and (ii) the expiration of the Initial Six Months but only provided that Borrower has complied with the requirements of subsection (4) above. | ||
(6) | During the Initial Six Months, Borrower shall not request an advance of Grant Money from the City (or any other governmental authority) without first having submitted to Administrative Agent a Draw Request containing a Street Project Advance in the same amount as the amount of Grant Money requested as set forth in subsection (1) above. At any time following the expiration of the Initial Six Months, and provided that Borrower has complied with the requirements of subsection (4) above, Borrower may submit requests to the City (or any other governmental authority) for Grant Money and if received apply such funds in whatever manner Borrower elects. |
LOAN NO.
|
DATE | |||||||||
PROJECT
|
||||||||||
LOCATION
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
BORROWER
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
FOR PERIOD ENDING | ||||||||||
1. CURRENT DRAW REQUEST FOR HARD COSTS
|
$ | |||
2. CURRENT DRAW REQUEST FOR SOFT COSTS
|
$ | |||
3. TOTAL DRAW REQUEST
|
$ |
|
Dated: | |||||
|
(a) | Performance Bond for the general contractor in amount, form and content satisfactory to Administrative Agent; and | ||
(b) | Payment Bond for the general contractor, in form and content satisfactory to Administrative Agent. |
Aggregate | ||||
Amount of | Amount of | Percentage | ||
Commitment/Loans | Commitment/Loans | Assigned of | ||
for all Lenders | Assigned | Commitment/Loans | ||
$ | $ | % |
ASSIGNOR: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
By: | |||||||
|
Name: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Title: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
ASSIGNEE: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
By: | |||||||
|
Name: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Title: | |||||||
|
By:
|
||||||
|
Name: | |||||
|
||||||
|
Title: | |||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
[Consented to:] | ||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
By:
|
||||||
|
Name: | |||||
|
||||||
|
Title: | |||||
|
EXHIBIT L, PAGE 4
(a) | LIBOR Lending Office: | |||||||
|
||||||||
Assignee name: | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Address: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Attention: | |||||||
|
Telephone: (_) | |||||||
|
Facsimile: (_) | |||||||
Electronic Mail: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
(b) | Domestic Lending Office: | |||||||
|
||||||||
Assignee name: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Address: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Attention: | |||||||
|
Telephone: (_) | |||||||
|
Facsimile: (_) | |||||||
Electronic Mail: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
(c) | Notice Address: | |||||||
|
||||||||
Assignee name: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Address: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Attention: | |||||||
|
Telephone: (_) | |||||||
|
Facsimile: (_) | |||||||
Electronic Mail: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
(d) | Payment Instructions: | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Account No. | |||||||
|
Attention: | |||||||
|
Reference: | |||||||
EXHIBIT L, PAGE 5
|
||||
$
|
April ___, 2010 |
EXHIBIT M, PAGE 1
EXHIBIT M, PAGE 2
EXHIBIT M, PAGE 3
EXHIBIT M, PAGE 4
EXHIBIT M, PAGE 5
|
BORROWER: | ||
|
|||
|
HF LOGISTICS-SKX T1, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company |
||
|
|||
|
By: HF Logistics-SKX, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, its sole member |
||
|
|||
|
By: HF Logistics I, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, its managing member |
[FORM OF NOTE] | ||||
By: | ||||
Iddo Benzeevi, President and | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
EXHIBIT M, PAGE 6
Attn: |
Commercial Loan Administration
Telephone: (305) 468-4347 Facsimile: (305) 468-4364 Electronic Mail: althea.v.lyn-sue@baml.com |
Domestic and LIBOR Lending Office
:
|
Commitment Amount: $27,500,000.00 | |
|
||
|
Pro Rata Share: 50% |
Attn: |
Commercial Loan Administration
Telephone: (305) 468-4347 Facsimile: (305) 468-4364 Electronic Mail: althea.v.lyn-sue@baml.com |
Attn: |
Commercial Loan Administration
Telephone: (305) 468-4347 Facsimile: (305) 468-4364 Electronic Mail: althea.v.lyn-sue@baml.com |
EXHIBIT N, PAGE 1
Domestic and LIBOR Lending Office:
|
Commitment Amount: $27,500,000.00 | |
|
||
|
Pro Rata Share: 50% |
Attn: |
Telephone: Facsimile: (866) 597-4002 Electronic Mail: mary.farrell@raymondjames.com |
Attn: |
Telephone: Facsimile: (866) 597-4002 Electronic Mail: mary.farrell@raymondjames.com |
EXHIBIT N, PAGE 2
- | 21,275 m 2 warehouse space (hereinafter the Warehouse); | ||
- | 1,320 m 2 mezzanine space (hereinafter the Mezzanine); | ||
- | 350 m 2 office space (hereinafter the Office Space) on mezzanine. |
new Price =
|
Price x new index
|
- | to maintain, repair and renew the interior paintwork and the interior | ||
- | decoration of the Premises. | ||
- | to maintain, repair and, if necessary, to replace the sanitary fittings, | ||
- | the water faucets and any equivalent appliances and fittings. | ||
- | to properly maintain the water pipes, the water outlets and sewer pipes, | ||
- | emptying grease traps and protect them against frost and, if necessary, | ||
- | to unblock them. | ||
- | to repair any damage which is not directly the result of age or a | ||
- | defective condition and, if necessary, to replace them. | ||
- |
to repair and, if necessary, to replace the wall pannelling, floors, all
locks and electrical equipment.
|
21.1 | This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties hereto with regard to the object to which it refers and contains everything the parties have negotiated and agreed upon within the framework of this Agreement. | ||
No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall take effect unless it is in writing and is executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties. | |||
The Appendices to this Agreement form an integral part thereof and any reference to this Agreement shall include a reference to the Appendices and vice versa. | |||
It replaces and annuls any agreement, communication, offer, proposal, or correspondence, oral or written, previously exchanged or concluded between the parties and referring to the same object. | |||
21.2 | Notwithstanding any provision contrary to the present Agreement, neither party shall be liable for a delay or failure to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement arising from any cause beyond its reasonable control or arising from strikes, lockouts, work stoppages or other collective labor disputes, insofar that the party invoking the force majeure informs the other party as soon as reasonable possible of the occurrence and the estimated duration and the termination thereof, as well as an accurate description of the causes thereof. In case the situation of force majeure has a duration of more than two (2) months, the other party is entitled to terminate this Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. | ||
21.3 | The parties acknowledge that they have required all notices and legal proceedings provided for under the present Agreement, or related hereto, to be drawn up in the English language, to the extent permitted by rules of public policy relating directly or indirectly to these proceedings. | ||
21.4 | If one or more of the provisions of this Agreement is declared to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under the applicable law, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not in any way be affected. In the case whereby such invalid, illegal or unenforceable clause affects the entire nature of this Agreement, each of the parties shall use its best efforts to immediately and in good faith negotiate a legally valid replacement provision. | ||
21.5 | No failure or delay of a party to exercise any right or remedy under this Agreement shall be considered a final waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right or remedy preclude any other or further exercise thereof. The rights and remedies provided in this Agreement are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies provided by law. | ||
21.6 | If this Agreement is to be registered, Skechers shall do so as soon as reasonably possible. A proof of registration is to be submitted to ProLogis. The costs and possible penalties resulting thereof are to be borne solely by Skechers. | ||
21.7 | The parties acknowledge that they have required the present Agreement to be drawn up in the French and the English language, both with equal value. The French version will be used for registration purposes. The English version will be attached to the French version as Appendix 8 . |
/s/ Gerrit Jan Meerkerk
|
/s/ David Weinberg
|
|||
Gerrit Jan Meerkerk
|
David Weinberg |
Appendices:
|
1. | Situation Plan (02/06 6102 07-04-2008); | ||||
|
2. | Building permit Application (E16256); | ||||
|
3. | Plans and Specifications DC II / Outline specifications (May 2008); | ||||
|
4. | List of services, supplies and site maintenance (09-Oct.-2007); | ||||
|
5. | n/a | ||||
|
6. | Gedas report; | ||||
|
7. | n/a | ||||
|
8. | n/a | ||||
|
9. | n/a | ||||
|
10. | n/a |
2
Liège 7 July 2008
REGISTERED LETTER
S.P.R.L. PROLOGIS Belgium III
J.E. Mommaerstlaan, 18
1831 DIEGEM
Our Ref.: E16256/BM/MRM
Encl.: 1 set of plans + notification
STATE APPROVED ACTION AND WORKS
recorded in the land registry under no. 450 e2
,
g2,
and the purpose of which is the construction of an industrial hall
General Directorate for Town and Country Planning, Housing and Heritage
Main address: Rue des Brigades dIrlande 1, B-5100 Namur
Tel.: 081 33 21 11
Fax: 081
33 21 10
www.wallonie.be
Freephone no. 0800 11 901 (general information)
Our Ref.: E16256/BM/MRM
2/3
the Promotion Initiatives Service SPI+, whose opinion requested on 21.05.2008 and issued on
28.05.2008 is favourable;
Whereas the project is located within an area of the SPI+;
the I.I.L.E., whose opinion requested on 21.05.2008 and issued on 16.06.2008 is favourable
subject to conditions;
on public safety grounds;
the construction of an industrial (storage) hall of 21,275 m
2
as an extension to an
existing hall;
Our Ref.: E16256/BM/MRM
2/3
Our Ref.: E16256/BM/MRM
2/3
The planning permission expires ipso jure.
The extension is granted by the Government or the delegated officer.
1. A certificate issued in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated in Article 95,
paragraph 1;
2. A deed of division drawn up by the notary stipulating the town planning guidelines for all of
the structures and the management methods of the communal areas.
The planning permission must mention any possible phases of execution of the structures and state
the start of every phase.
2/3
This statement will be recorded in an official report.
Outline Specifications
SKECHERS DC 2 Milmort
Ø
Minimum clear height of 10.8 m
Ø
Steel building frame or concrete building frame with wooden laminated beams design
reference-period 50 years.
Ø
General column bay spacing 22m x 12 m
Ø
2 Overhead doors, 4x 4,5 meter
Ø
Certified ESFR K14 roof-net sprinkler system in warehouse
Ø
Loading docks 28 nos. electrically operated doors and levelers (6t dynamic load, l0t
static load), equipped with weather shelters and buffers, doors with vision panel.
Ø
Loading pit (concrete) in front
Ø
3 no level access doors per fire compartment
Ø
Minimum floor loading capacity of 5,000 kg/m
2
, and a rack leg load of 6000 kg.
Ø
Average floor flatness of Zeile 4 (DIN 18202) 5 mm under 2m screed
Ø
Heating central gas heating to 18°C with outside temperature -10°C
Ø
Abrasion resistance top floor according class MS 25, Dutch code NEN 2743.
Ø
Minimum lighting level 150 Lux; average lighting level 200 Lux, measured on 1
meter above floor before the installation of racks.
Ø
Fire alarm and evacuation alarm, fire hoses, emergency lighting as per regulations.
Ø
Insulation value of 2.5 for the roof and façade (Rc = 2.5 m
2
K/W)
Ø
Roof rainwater discharge through a pluvia system
Ø
Insulated concrete panel plinth (height 2,25m) at loading
docks (front façade) and at
side and back facades (height 3,75m)
Ø
Maximum air leakage of the warehouse shell: 3 m3/h/m2
Ø
Concrete wheel guides to protect loading docks
Ø
Crash protection poles for all dock doors, level access doors and sliding fire doors.
Crash protection for all vertical pipes and stairs in the warehouse.
Ø
Per unit battery charge points with battery charge electrical connection point:
-
5 outlets 3*400V/32A (excluding equipment)
-
5 outlets 240V/16A (excluding equipment)
Ø
Windows in front on mezzanine level, see drawing architect.
Ø
3 fire rf
1
/
2
hr, doors 3.8 x 4.85 m in fire wall, according to local regulation.
Ø
Mezzanine floor above loading docks, depth 9.45 meter deep and a floor load
capacity of 400 kg/m2.
Ø
Transformer and switch room by DC1 existing building.
Ø
Water supply sprinkler by existing installation.
Ø
Sprinkler pump and room according to regulations
Ø
Restroom/ canteen on mezzanine.
Ø
A grey water system to be installed for re-use of rain water for flushing toilets and
irrigation
Ø
Employee entrance in side wall under mezzanine
Ø
Guard house between truck entrance and truck exit including new entrance trucks
see drawing architect.
Ø
Fire alarm and evacuation alarm, fire hoses, emergency lighting as per regulations.
Ø
2 m high security fencing and manually operating sliding gates.
Ø
Loading pit is suitable for incoming and outgoing standard European trucks
according to EVO advice
Ø
Landscaping as required
Ø
Concrete brickwork paving with heavy-duty 100 mm in truck zone, 80 mm in
passenger vehicle areas.
Ø
Ample car parking and truck on site (in front of building, see drawing architect)
Ø
The front of the façade of the truck court has an average lighting to 10 Lux
Ø
Outside lighting: Roads and parking 20 Lux
Site Maintenance
Component
Frequency
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
2x p.a.
1x p.a.
N/A
N/A
N/A
1x/3. years
1x p.a.
N/A
1x p.a.
N/A
2x p.a.
N/A
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
2x p.a.
1x/2 years
N/A
N/A
Components
Frequency
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
All year round
1x/3 years
1x/8 years
1x/5 years
N/A
N/A
N/A
1x p.a.
26x p.a.
1x/3 years
1xp.a.
1x/3 years
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
1x/2 years
1x/6 years
1x/12 years
1x/15 years
2x p.a.
1x p.a.
1x p.a.
N/A
N/A
excluded
*
Component if applicable; specific in-house components may be added.
*
Final frequency to be set in line with use and business process.
*
Service level may be extended by mutual agreement (based on Article 16 of the General Terms and
Conditions)
GEDAS NV
Clara Snellingsstraat 27
2100 ANTWERPEN-DEURNE
Tel 03 360 83 00
Fax 03 360 83 01
E-mail: info@gedas.be
Deume,
23
th
September 2002
Contact:
kpeperstraete@gedas.be
mclerinx@gedas.be
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
ProLogis Belgium II Sprl
Avenue du parc industriel
Industrial Park Hauts-Sarts-Milmort
Our Ref.:
11/15/002415
Direct line:
0032/3/3608395
Update
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Direct fax:
0032/3/3608394
ProLogis BV
Adviesvertening, studie en ontwerp van gebouwen, infrastructuur, milieu en ruimtelijke ordening
Page
5
5
5
6
7
8
8
8
10
14
15
16
16
16
17
17
17
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
22
23
23
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
26
26
27
28
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
2/44
Page
29
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
3/44
Site Photographs
Site photograph
Aerial photograph
Plans and Charts
Location site
Location borings
Location current and future buildings
Measurement plan
Location photographs
Location heating equipments
Documents
Cadastral map
Soil investigation
Groundwaterdata
Industrial zoning
Building permit
Reaction of municipality of Herstal
Correspondence with the archeological
authorities
Environmental Report Tick List
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
4/44
actual and previous use/site history;
soil and groundwater;
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
5/44
general environmental setting;
surrounding land use and potential impacts on the site;
legal requirements, permits;
Record review: review of available information related to the former and present uses of
the location and adjacent properties.
Site reconnaissance: a visit to the property to investigate the Site and surrounding
properties.
Interviews with current owners and with the government
Preparation of a written Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report, with a summary of
GEDASs conclusions and recommendations.
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
6/44
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
7/44
Page:
8/44
Avenue du Parc Industriel
4041 Herstal-Milmort (Liège)
ProLogis Belgium II Sprl
Capronilaan, 25-27
Schiphol-Rijk
The Netherlands
1119 NP
Ko Nuiten
Zuzanna Eskinasi
+31/206.556.639
+31/206.556.600
none required
none required
none required
none required
none required
none required
Not applicable
Not applicable still a vacant building
agricultural use until approx. 2001
2001 till 2002 construction of building (Lot I, Phase I)
Not applicable Untill now no activities have been executed on
the investigated site
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Page:
9/44
Not applicable
none
none
community of Herstal, Division 6, Section A, cadastral parcel 620 a (27.529 m
2
)
community of Herstal, Division 7, Section A cadastral parcel 450 b2 (40.548 m
2
)
community of Herstal, Division 7, Section A cadastral parcel 450 c2 (9.576 m
2
)
(cf.
appendix 3.1.).
Date:
23th September 2002
Page: 10/44
Date:
23th September 2002
Page: 11/44
a heating circuit with a boiler unit (Ø 160) in the administration building (Firm Elco
Klöcler) Two heating rooms are present. The equipment in the offices consist of Radson radiators.
16 modern heating radiators type Reznor in the logistic halls.
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
12/44
Date:
23th September 2002
Page:
13/44
Date: 23th September 2002
Page:
14/44
Implantation
: A connecting road should be present for the intervention
vehicles (fire department, ambulance ,...) This road should be 4 m long and should be located at a distance
of 2 m from the building. This has been fulfilled.
Structure :
Rf-value (fire resistance)
1
/
2
h, electricity should be
controlled by a recognized
expert, the safety exits should be clearly marked, pictograms must be applied, an alarm
should be installed
Fire protection :
The site must be equipped with sufficient hose reels. The
whole building
must be reached with one jet of water. A proposal with the
implantation of the fire extinguishers for the whole building complex must be transferred. Two Fire extinguishers based
on water must be installed on each officelevel. Four CO
2
fire extinguishers
must be installed on specific sites on the location. The installation of automatic fire / smoke
detectors
and a sprinkler system is required. An aboveground hydrant should exists (possible to supply 60 m
3
/hour, during 2 hours).
Date:
23th September 2002
Page: 14/44
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 16/44
Measurement plan dated
6
th
November 2000, 03/3043 (neighbouring site)
Measurement plan dated
6
th
of
January 2001, 11/11/1844
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 17/44
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; dated
5
th
October 2001, 03/3043 (neighbouring site)
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; report 11/15/1844 dated 18
th
January 2001,
11/11/1844
Geotechnical site investigation dated
29
th
November 2000, 03/3043 (neighbouring site)
Geotechnical site investigation dated
23
th
January
2001, 11/11/1844
Soil investigation dated 9th October 2000, 03/3043 (neighbouring site)
Topographical survey dated
December 21
st
2000, 11/11/1844
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 18/44
Techspace aero S.A., Route de Liers, 121, 4041 Milmort, T : 04/278.81.11, F :
04/278.52.07
Activity
: Production of aircraft engines and treatment of waste products related with
the production process. The activities are present since 30 to 40 years. No particular problems
were ever noticed.
Weerts: Avenue du parc industriel,. This is a rather new site, still under
construction.:
Activity
: Transport of chocolates
Lair liquide Belge S.A., Avenue du parc industriel, 2, 4041 Milmort, T
: 04/287.78.78, F : 04/278.67.47
Page: 19/44
Activity
: Filling up canisters with industrial gases : The activities are present
since 6 à 7 years. No problems were ever reported.
Gar. Collette Sprl (Mitsubishi), Route de Liers, 122, 4041 Milmort, T : 04/278.58.16 , F :
04/278.71.14
Activity
: garage
Galliker Transport & Logistics, Avenue du parc Industriel, 4041 Milmort, T :
04/287.01.01, F : 04/278.03.03
Activity
:
The company is active in the transport sector. Activities are present
since 1985-1990.
ISPC, Route de Liers, 125, 4041 Milmort, T : 04/278.92.92
Activity
: A wholesale business (+ transport) in horeca requirements (food, cooking
utensils, etc. ). The company is located on the site since 2 years.
Van Dijck S.A., Route de Liers, 4-6, 4041 Milmort, T : 04/278.73.25, F : 04/278.06.37
Activity
: Production of clinckers
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 20/44
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 21/44
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 22/44
A description of the project, the location, planning and dimensions
The necessary information to identify and to value the effects of the project on the
environment
A description of the necessary measures necessary to avoid negative aspects
A non-technical description of the data mentioned above
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 23/44
1
Décret sur la protection et lexploitation des eaux sousterraines et des eaux potables
2
sur la protection et lexploitation des eaux sousterraines et des eaux potables
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 24/44
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 25/44
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 26/44
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 27/44
Our Phase I ESA did not reveal any recognised environmental conditions and no indications of
possible land contamination were reported nor noted and no further investigation is
recommended or required.
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 28/44
Finding / Conclusion:
Based on the findings of
the site inspection and
data review / desk
study, the actual and
planned future site
utilization and the
identified subsurface
situation
do not inhere
any relevant
environmental risks
Recommendation:
No Action required
Finding / Conclusion:
During the walk-over
inspection, no issues
representing a relevant
matter of environmental
concern or indicating
the need for major
rehabilitation- or
corrective measures have
been identified
Recommendation:
No Action required
Finding / Conclusion:
On Lot I, Phase I a new
storage building had
been constructed. On
this parcel no building
expansion is provided.
Recommendation:
No Action required
Finding / Conclusion:
Existing documents state
that the actual
buildings show no
deviation of the planned
building and the
constructed building
with regard to location
and size.
Recommendation:
No Action required
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 29/44
Finding / Conclusion:
Site activities at this time do not comprise
use/handling of hazardous materials and materials
of environmental concern requiring official
permission and regulatory surveillance.
Recommendation:
No Action required
Finding / Conclusion:
Truck traffic is not present at this time. In the
future traffic will not pass through designated
areas. Since the site entrance as well as the
loading / unloading areas and internal traffic
zones are not neighbored by housing areas, truck
traffic generated noise amissions are unlikely to
be a nuisance in the future.
Recommendation:
No Action presently
Finding / Conclusion:
Should future storage / handling of larger volumes
of combustible / flammable materials or an
expansion of the halls result in an increase of the
fire risk, an upgrading of the present fire
prevention / fire fighting installations would be
required
Recommendation:
Internal assessment of future fire load situation
depending on planned storage activities, informal
discussion with authorities regarding potential
permission requirements.
No Action presently
Finding / Conclusion:
Based on the soil analysis no further soil and
groundwater investigation
or remedial actions are required by the authorities.
Recommendation:
No Action required
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 30/44
Finding / Conclusion:
The following easement exist for the ProLogis-site :
A connecting road
should be present for the intervention
vehicles
(4m long at a distance of 2 m
from the building)
Recommendation:
No Action required
Marleen Clerinx
Herwig Teughels
Date: 23th September 2002
Page: 31/44
1.
1.1.
1.2.
Date:
23th September 2002
Page: 32/44
2.
2.1.
2.2.
2.3.
2.4.
2.5.
2.6.
Date:
23th September 2002
Page: 33/44
3.1.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
3.5.
3.6.
3.7.
3.8.
Date:
23th September 2002
Page: 34/44
4.
Date:
23th September 2002
Page: 35/44
ministère des Finances Administration EXTRAIT DE LA MATRICE CADASTRALE DE LA COMMUNE DE
DQMAINB DB LA SPI+/SERVICES PROMOTION IN BN PROVINCE DE LIEGE 4000 1IEGB R LQNKIBHNE 14 PARTIE DE
LARTICLE CHBH DB VOOTBH AV DU PARC INDUSTRIEL 0176 498 C TERRE H 27 21 1B 2750 10 700 450 2 TBRR8
N .7 19 64 1B 2750 1G 19700 LSGEHT DELEGUE,
0279 SUR FILAUMS A 589 TERRE S 18. 52 1 3000 16 550 0280 CMBBBRDNSHAOI- A 650/02 CHEMIN 9 61. 90
490 16 300 0286 A LA CHAUSSEE A 540 H SERBE M 40 37 1 3000 1G 1200 0287 A LA A 547 B SERRE 79 1
SOBO IG 2000 0288 SUR PILAOHB A 588, D TERRE N 09 270 0289 A LA CHAUSSEE A 549; C TERRE V 46. 53 1
3000 10 1300 0294 SUR PILOMB A 588 C TERRE 10 31 1 300p 10 300 0304 CUBE BRONEHADW A 544 C TERRE M
29 90 1 3000 1G 850 0305 CH2B A 350 8 TERRE 8 25 22 l. 3000 IG 7S0 0315 POND DE LISRS A 620 TERRE S
09 59 1 3000 10 280 (2) Période 0001 .0002 0004 (3) Première position du Code
0338 A IA CHAUSSBB A 551 C TBRRB H 77 40 1 3000 IS 2300 0356 CHB A Ç42 Ç TBRRB S 41 20 1 .3000 10
1200 0357 CHB A 545 C TBRRB H 29 00 1 3000 10 850 0360 CHBB 0363 A IA CHAUSSÉS A 538 A TBRRB H 14
80 1 3000 10 440 0364 CHBB A 539 C TBRRB H 42 77 1 3000 10 1200 0371 FOND DE MERS A 617 TBRRB N 1
11 45 1 3000 10 3300 389 CHBB BRUHBKAUT A 543 C TBRRB H 20 00 1 3000 10 600 02 SUR FIWVNNE A 383 C
TERRE H 92 40 1 3000 2700 0404 A 584 K TBRRB 8 13 44 1 3000 10 400 0406 SUR FICRKH8 A. 594 H TBRRB
N 37 90 1 3000 IS 1100 0424 FOND DE SIERS A 621 B TBRRB H 4 45 17 1 3000 10 13300 0427 A 539 S
TERRE H 04 93 2A 3000 18 140 Revenu à LAGENT DELEGUE,
PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA
Avenue du Parc Industriel 159
4041 Herstal
Research site
Avenue du Parc Industriel 159
4041 Herstal
12/01/2010
Author:
Timothy Geerts
Function:
Project assistant
Date:
4/2/10
Revised by:
Mark Van Straaten
Function:
CEO
Date:
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
3
7
9
9
10
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
15
15
15
15
16
16
17
17
17
22
22
27
27
27
27
28
29
30
30
31
47
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
5
ANNEX 7.2: Certificates leak tests and soil/tank processing
ANNEX 7.3: Technical description sampling
ANNEX 7.4: Drilling logs
ANNEX 7.5: Analytical methods and original analysis reports
ANNEX 7.6: Results previous soil investigations
ANNEX 7.7: Evaluation values for non-normalized parameters
ANNEX 8.2: Colouring of the research site according to land use
ANNEX 8.3: Cadastral data
ANNEX 8.4: Detailed map research site
ANNEX 8.5: Detailed map detected soil contamination
ANNEX 8.6: Detailed map detected groundwater contamination
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
6
PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA
Attn. Pieter Ris
Pegasusparklaan 5
1831 DIEGEM (MACHELEN)
Phone: (+31)20/655.66.71
Fax: (+31)20/655.66.00
drilling/soil sampling
wells/ground water sampling
14/14/2009
/
14/12/2009
/
16/12/2009
/
24/12/2009
/
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
7
Municipality
Municipality N°
Section
Parcel N°
Surface (m
2
)
62051
A
450 G 2
37099
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
9
Table 2-4 Geological structure of
the research site
Chronostratigraphie
Stratigraphie
Description
Recent alluvia of the Meuse. Recent
colluviums.
Homogeneous loess-like silt.
Old alluvia constituting the various levels of
terraces of the Meuse.
Sands and gravels of fluviatile origin (Onx)
Tongrien
Marine siliceous sands
Crétacique
Conglomerate with flint or scattered flint
Chalks with argillaceous intercalations
Houiller
Sandstone, schists and psammites
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
10
Site extraction
X (km)
Y (km)
Distance (m)
RUE DE
MAESTRICHT 102
235,456
153,166
388
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
11
Soil investigation
09/10/2000
Gedas
03/3043
(Quote)
according to the current legislation there is no contamination above the
intervention values on the site
no additional soil investigation should be conducted on the site
the slightly elevated concentrations of heavy metals are natural background
values, and of no concern
the parcels should not be registered as polluted soils
no remedial action is necessary
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
12
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
13
Research site
PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA
Avenue du Parc Industrial 159
4041 Herstal
37099 m
2
General
screening research
site according to
strategy 1
N
o
of blocs
N
o
of drillings
N
o
of wells
N
o
of analyses soil WSAP
N° of analyses
groundwater SAP
6
12
0
12
0
Description suspected
zones and surface area
Sampling strategy
Description potential
pollution sources and surface
area
Soil
protection
Suspected
substances
Suspected soil
layer
No of
drillings
(Ind. wells)
N
o
of wells
N
o
of
analyses
soil
N
o
of analyses
groundwater
Unsuspected
1
Asphalt, concrete,
none
0-1 m bgl
12
0
12
0
Total no of drillings
(Ind. wells)
Total no of wells
12
0
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
14
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
15
Trajectory
Zone
Source
Drilling
Depth (m)
(m-g.l.)
Sensory observation
Unsuspected
58
0,5
0,10-0,50
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
37099 m
2
Drilling stopped at 0,50 m-gl (impenetrable layer)
5A
0,6
0,10-0,60
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
Drilling stopped at 0,60 m-gl (impenetrable layer)
5
0,5
0,10-0,50
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
Drilling stopped at 0,50 m-gl (impenetrable layer)
1
2
0,10-0,30
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
2
0,6
0,10-0,60
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
Drilling stopped at 0,60 m-gl (impenetrable layer)
3
0,5
0,10-0,50
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
Drilling stopped at 0,50 m-gl (impenetrable layer)
4
0,5
0,10-0,50
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
Drilling stopped at 0,50 m-gl (impenetrable layer)
13
0,4
0,10-0,40
Containing extreme ammounts of stone
Drilling stopped at 0,50 m-gl (impenetrable layer)
Zone
Source
(Mixed)Sample
Analysis
Unsuspected
1 (1,50-2,00)
Walloon SAP package ground
37099 m
2
2 (0,10-0,60)
Walloon SAP package ground
3 (0,10-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
4 (0,10-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
5 (0,10-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
6 (1,50-2,00)
Walloon SAP package ground
7 (0,00-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
8 (0,00-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
9 (0,00-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
10 (1,50-2,00)
Walloon SAP package ground
11 (0,00-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
12 (0,00-0,50)
Walloon SAP package ground
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
16
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
17
Sampling
Clay (%)
Organic Matter (%)
pH
30,0
<0,5
6,8
Sampling
Clay (%)
Organic matter (%)
pH
18,5
1,2
7,8
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
18
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
1,50-2,00
1,50-2,00
1,50-2,00
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
V
V
V
18,5
18,5
16,5
1,2
1,2
1,2
7,8
7,8
7,8
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
81,4
84,9
84,0
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<38
<38
<38
50,0
300
900
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,800
97,3
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,300
7,20
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,080
30,0
1.650
<0,01
0,019
<0,01
0,200
10,1
268
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,060
2,50
30,0
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,150
5,10
320
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,200
1,10
30,0
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,200
0,600
30,0
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
35,0
4,690
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,550
30,0
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
62,0
3.150
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
19,0
4,690
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,300
3,60
<0,005
<0,005
<0,005
0,100
1,50
4.690
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
0,200
0,600
33,7
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,200
4,60
150
<0,095
<0,095
<0,095
<0,2
<0,2
<0,2
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<10
<10
<10
21,0
41,2
267
<0,4
<0,4
<0,4
0,700
2,63
30,0
34,0
17,0
33,0
82,3
91,0
880
12,0
6,80
11,0
21,7
104
500
<0,I
<0,1
<0,1
0,100
1,70
11,0
<10
<10
14,0
25,7
120
1.250
26,0
14,0
28,0
24,6
56,0
530
45,0
27,0
49,0
89,5
354
1.250
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,1
<0,1
0,1
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
8,10
5,20
9,40
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
19
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
0,00-0,50
0,00-0,50
0,00-0,50
0,00-0,50
0,00-0,50
14/12/2009
16/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
V
V
V
V
V
38
30
30
30
30
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
6,8
5,8
6,8
6,8
6,8
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
82,6
82,3
84,7
81,2
85,6
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<38
<38
<38
<38
<38
50,0
300
750
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,800
81,6
0,085
0,046
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,300
7,20
0,047
0,042
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,080
30,0
1.650
0,150
0,084
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,200
10,1
268
0,088
0,043
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,060
2,50
30,0
0,083
0,050
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,150
5,10
320
0,110
0,054
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,200
1,10
30,0
0,048
0,024
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,200
0,600
30,0
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
35,0
4,690
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,550
30,0
0,110
0,060
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
62,0
3.150
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
19,0
4.690
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,100
0,300
3,60
0,009
<0,005
<0,005
<0,005
<0,005
0,100
1,50
4.690
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
<.0,05
<0,05
0,200
0,600
32,0
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,200
4,60
134
0,510
0,290
<0,095
<0,095
<0,095
0,740
0,400
<0,2
<0,2
<0,2
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
12,0
<10
<10
<10
<10
25,9
46,0
267
1,50
1,50
<0,4
0,620
<0,4
0,700
2,43
30,0
30,0
32,0
34,0
25,0
22,0
96,5
91,0
880
15,0
17,0
11,0
13,0
8,20
23,9
138
500
<0,1
0,130
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
0,100
1,70
11,0
58,0
55,0
13,0
26,0
<10
24,7
120
1,250
18,0
19,0
25,0
21,0
18,0
34,5
56,0
530
180
180
48,0
93,0
33,0
101
549
1,250
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
0,130
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
7,80
8,90
9,00
7,80
6,50
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
20
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
0,10-0,50
0,10-0,60
0,10-0,50
0,10-0,50
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
V
V
V
V
30
30
30
30
0,5
0,5
0,5
0,5
6,8
6,8
6,8
6,8
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
96,6
92,1
91,4
96,3
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
9,30
<6
<6
50,0
24,0
<12
22,0
19,0
14,0
13,0
17,0
15,0
4,10
<3
<3
<5
<5
<5
<38
100
63,0
39,0
50,0
300
750
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,01
0,045
0,017
0,012
0,100
0,800
81,6
0,011
0,300
0,130
0,056
0,100
0,300
7,20
0,031
0,360
0,270
0,046
0,080
30,0
1.650
<0,01
0,920
0,420
0,059
0,200
10,1
268
<0,01
0,370
0,150
0,041
0,060
2,50
30,0
0,011
0,310
0,440
0,045
0,150
5,10
320
0,018
0,360
0,150
0,071
0,200
1,10
30,0
<0,01
0,160
0,075
0,028
0,200
0,600
30,0
<0,01
0,220
0,120
0,085
0,100
35,0
4.690
<0,01
0,140
0,120
0,042
0,100
0,550
30,0
<0,01
0,520
0,280
0,044
0,100
62,0
3.150
<0,01
0,038
0,032
<0,01
0,100
19,0
4,690
<0,01
0,050
0,021
<0,01
0,100
0,300
3,60
<0,005
0,076
0,048
0,008
0,100
1,50
4.690
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
0,200
0,600
32,0
<0,01
0,026
0,039
0,011
0,200
4,60
134
<0,095
2,90
1,50
0,420
<0,2
3,90
2,00
0,550
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<10
<10
<10
<10
25,9
46,0
267
<0,4
0,670
<0,4
<0,4
0,700
2,43
30,0
9,10
18,0
24,0
7,20
96,5
91,0
880
<5
18,0
31,0
<5
23,9
138
500
<0,1
0,120
<0,1
<0,1
0,100
1,70
11,0
<10
79,0
47,0
<10
24,7
120
1.250
8,20
16,0
18,0
7,20
34,5
56,0
530
40,0
180
370
50,0
101
549
1.250
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,1
0,110
<0,1
0,170
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<5
<5
8,70
<5
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
21
-
The Walloon legislation concerning service stations, dated
4/03/1999. This legislation
is only applicable to service stations.
-
The Decree on soil remediation and rehabilitation of economical sites (M.B.
07/06/2004). This decree is not yet active.
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
22
[ILLEGIBLE]
7
8
9
1
2
VR
VS
VI
1,50-2,00
0,00-0,50
1,50-2,00
0,00-0,50
0,00-0,50
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
V
V
V
V
V
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
81,4
82,6
84,9
82,3
84,7
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
2,5
130
160
15
130
520
15
1250
2500
15
1250
2500
<38
<38
<38
<38
<38
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,1
2,58
25
<0,01
0,085
<0,01
0,046
<0,01
0,01
1,3
13
<0,01
0,047
<0,01
0,042
<0,01
0,1
16
164
<0,01
0,150
0,019
0,084
<0,01
0,01
47
475
<:0,01
0,088
<0,01
0,043
<0,01
0,01
1,5
15
<0,01
0,083
<0,01
0,050
<0,01
0,01
6
60
<0,01
0,110
<0,01
0,054
<0,01
0,01
1,3
13
<0,01
0,048
<0,01
0,024
<0,01
0,01
4,7
47
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,01
5
46
<001
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,01
1,5
15
<0,01
0,110
<0,01
0,060
<0,01
0,01
6,4
64
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,01
16
163
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,0l
0,01
1,4
14
<0,005
0,009
<0,005
<0,005
<0,005
0,01
1,3
13,3
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
0,01
43
410
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,01
6
56
<0,095
0,510
<0,095
0,290
<0,095
<0,2
0,740
<0,2
0,400
<0,2
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<10
12,0
<10
<10
<10
12
50
300
<0,4
1,50
<0,4
1,50
<0,4
0,2
15
50
34,0
30,0
17,0
32,0
34,0
34
165
700
12,0
15,0
6,80
17,0
11,0
14
120
500
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
0,130
<0,1
0,05
5
50
<10
58,0
<10
55,0
13,0
25
385
1360
26,0
18,0
14,0
19,0
25,0
24
210
500
45,0
180
27,0
180
48,0
67
320
1300
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,1
0,130
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
8,10
7,80
5,20
8,90
9,00
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS
BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
23
[ILLEGIBLE]
7
8
9
1
2
VR
VS
VI
0,00-0,50
0,00-0,50
0,10-0,50
1,50-2,00
0,10-0,60
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
0430 G 2
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
V
V
V
V
V
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
81,2
85,6
96,6
84,0
92,1
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
4,10
2,5
130
160
<5
15
130
520
9,30
15
1250
2500
50,0
22,0
72,0
15
1250
2500
13,0
<38
<38
<38
<38
100
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,045
0,1
2,58
25
<0,01
<0,01
0,011
<0,01
0,300
0,01
1,3
13
<0,01
<0,01
0,031
<0,01
0,360
0,1
16
164
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,920
0,01
47
475
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,370
0,01
1,5
15
<0,01
<0,01
0,011
<0,01
0,310
0,01
6
60
<0,01
<0,01
0,018
<0,01
0,360
0,01
1,3
13
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,160
0,01
4,7
47
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,220
0,01
5
46
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,140
0,01
1,5
15
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,520
0,01
6,4
64
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,038
0,01
16
163
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,050
0,01
1,4
14
<0,005
<0,005
<0,005
<0,005
0,076
0,01
1,3
13,3
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
<0,05
0,01
43
410
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
<0,01
0,026
0,01
6
56
<0,095
<0,095
<0,095
<0,095
2,90
<0,2
<0,2
<0,2
<0,2
3,90
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
12
50
300
0,620
<0,4
<0,4
<0,4
0,670
0,2
15
50
25,0
22,0
9,10
33,0
18,0
34
165
700
13,0
8,20
<5
11,0
18,0
14
120
500
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
0,120
0,05
5
50
26,0
<10
<10
14,0
79,0
25
385
1360
21,0
18,0
<8,20
28,0
16,0
24
210
500
93,0
33,0
40,0
49,0
180
67
320
1300
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
<0,1
0,110
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
7,80
6,50
<5
9,40
<5
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
24
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
VR
VS
VI
0,10-0,50
0,10-0,50
14/12/2009
14/12/2009
0450 G 2
0450 G 2
V
V
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
91,4
96,3
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<3
<3
2,5
130
160
<5
<5
15
130
520
<6
<6
15
1250
2500
24,0
<12
19,0
14,0
43
26
15
1250
2500
17,0
15,0
63,0
39,0
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
0,017
0,012
0,1
2,58
25
0,130
0,056
0,01
1,3
13
0,270
0,046
0,1
16
164
0,420
0,059
0,01
47
475
0,150
0,041
0,01
1,5
15
0,140
0,045
0,01
6
60
0,150
0,071
0,01
1,3
13
0,075
0,028
0,01
4,7
47
0,120
0,085
0,01
5
46
0,120
0,042
0,01
1,5
15
0,280
0,044
0,01
6,4
64
0,032
<0,01
0,01
16
163
0,021
<0,01
0,01
1,4
14
0,048
0,008
0,01
1,3
13,3
<0,05
<0,05
0,01
43
410
0,039
0,011
0,01
6
56
1,50
0,420
2,00
0,550
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<10
<10
12
50
300
<0,4
<0,4
0,2
15
50
24,0
7,20
34
165
700
31,0
<5
14
120
500
<0,1
<0,1
0,05
5
50
47,0
<10
25
385
1360
18,0
7,20
24
210
500
370
50,0
67
320
1300
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
<0,1
0,170
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
[ILLEGIBLE]
8,70
<5
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
25
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
27
Harmful
Parameter >
Soil/
nature
Precaution
Limitation of
Parcel
Zone
activity
vs
groundwater
(1)
measures (Y/N)
use
(Y/N)
Unsuspected
Zinc (*)
Soil
N
N
N
(1)
H= Historic
,
G=Mixed, N=New
(*)
The Observed slightly elevated zinc concentration is most likely caused by the presence of
large ammounts of stones in the analyzed sample. Considering the fact that the sample has
been cryogenically grinded, it can be stated that the result is not representing the state of
the soil on the research site and the result can be disregarded.
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
28
Municipality
Municipality N°
Section
Parcel N°
Surface (m
2
)
62051
A
450 G 2
37099
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
29
There is no need to perform a descriptive soil investigation on the cadastral parcel.
There is no need for precaution measures or for limiting the usage of the cadastral parcel.
For
this research sufficient information could be gathered.
Timothy GEERTS,
Mark VAN STRAATEN,
Project assistant.
CEO.
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
30
Former and recent environmental permits
Certificates leak tests and soil/tank processing
Technical sampling description
Drilling logs
Analytical methods and original analysis reports
Results previous soil investigations
Evaluation values for non-normalized parameters
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
31
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
33
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
35
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
37
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM BVBA HERSTAL
39
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B1 Boring B2
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B3 Boring B4
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B5 Boring B5A
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B5B Boring B6
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B7 Boring B8
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B9 Boring B10
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B11 Boring B12
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
ALL SOIL ASSISTANCE
Boring: B13
Project 09/865 Opdratgever: Mava Bodemonderzoek Locationam: projects- Haratel
Microwave CMA 2/IIA.3.2
Gravimetry NEN 5747
Spectrometry ISO 14235
Sedimentation CMA 2/IIA.6
Potentiometry Conform NEN 5750
GC-FID conform CMA 3/R
Microcoulometry Conform CMA 3/N
HPLC
ICP-AES NEN 6426/CMA 2/ I/ B.1
ICP-MS NEN equivalent to NVN 7324/EN1483
LV-GC-FID Own method/CMA/R.1
HS-GC-MS CF. NEN-EN-ISO 10301/ CMA 3/E
HS-GC-MS Conform ISO 11423-1 / CMA 3 / E
ICP-MS Cf. O-NEN 6427/Equivalent to EN 11885
ICP-MS Equivalent to NVN 7324/EN 1483
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
41
MOVR Bodeaonderzoetc NV T.a.v. Sigrid Willeas Gorislaan *» B 1820 steenofckerzeei
BEIGIE Analysecftrtificaort Datun: 24-12-2009 Riorbij ontvangt u ds
resultatan van net navofgende laboratoriunondtrzoak. Certificootnunner 2009200031
Uw projactnuniaar 09/84S Prologis Uw projectnaon o?/«dS »0 Prologis Horstol
Uw ordornuMtr 09/8oB Prologis Monster(s) ontvengen 14-12-2009 Dit certifltaot
nag uitsluitend in iijn geheel worden gereprodueoord. Aonvullendo inforaatio behorenn bij
dit anolysecertifieoot kunt U vlnden in het ovarzicht Spaeifkaties flnolyseBethodon.
Extra exenptaran zijn verferijgboar bij do afdeling Vorkoop on Rdries. Dc grondnonsters
worden tot t woken na datun ontvangst gakeetd, beweard on watornonttars tot 2 woken no datum
ontvangst. Zonder teganbericht word en de sionsters nadien afgevoerd. Indian da ¦ ousters
langar bewoord dienen to blijvah varzdakan wijU dit oxeraplaar uitarl(jk 1 waak voor afloop van da
standaardbawaarparioda ondertekend oan on* to rotoumoran. Voor de kosten van hot langar bewaren van
Boosters verwijzen wij near do prijsljjst. Bowaran tot: Datust: Noam:
Handtakening: Wij vertrouwon orop uw.opdrachthieraee naar verwaehting to hobban
uitgavoard, siocht o naar aanlaiding van dit analysoeortificaat nog vragen nobben vorzookan wij U
contact op to noaan mot da afdoling Vorkoop on Rdvios. Met vriandelijko groet, C^li
Eurofins flnalytieo B.V. \$
j2/w
i
^
,,,
~
Ing. II.
Veldhurzen laboratoriumManager EsraflM fi«alytto> S.V. ciidtwg 44-44 w. *3l
Co)343<34300 MM MttO 14 «
74 4S< ewofinHlnalytlce s.v. Is ISO f eOi: 1MIjKtftiflCMrt do*r
Uoytfi mi n ioMavoii rw ?« <e)w ut <s»
v*ry»T# No. W ? **«»*.*><>
twiyleaoss «w»t-grVrHa m »
»: u*). M.mi» E-oaS! InfaConalrfico.caa niiM3.u.i».iDi
tietoru(i»lit«twtst 0»»0. hrt *cij|i»«»w»«t«««*E-0WD> 3770 01 aantimU si Site
www.arwlrtlco.eoii ««»o, OMOteCS w 4oord« mitisdra van rrankrige « iiuMfru>«0tV>.
Belgium Analysecertificaat Vw projectnuaner o?/8«5 Proloais
CartiftceatnuBiaer 2007200032 Ow projectnaan 09/8*5 EBO ProJogis lUrstal Startdetun
17-12-2009 Uw ordemunner 09/84B Proloais Reppertagedotuis 24-12-2009/07:03 DatUH
umttmoi 14-12-2009 Bijtage fl,C Monstemener RSfl Pagina 1/4
nalyte ~ Eenfaeid i
2 J * 5 Voofneaandeliag q Cryogeen eaten Uitgevoerd Bodemkandig*
analyses Q Drogestof K(n/si) 84.0 92.1 91.4 94.3 94.4 H«t«fM Q flrteen
(As> Mg/kg ds <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 q Cadniun(Cd) «g/kg dt <0.40 0.47
<0.40 <0.40 <0.40 Q Kebalt (Co) mg/kg dt 9.4 <5.o 8.7 <»,
©
<5.0
0. Chroon (Cr) og/kgdt 33 18 24 7.2 9.1 Q Kop«r(Cu) ng/kgds 11 18 31 <S.0
<5.0 q Kwik(Hg) ng/kgds <o.io 0.12 <0.10 <o.i0 <0.10 Q Nikkei
<Ni) mg/kg dx 28 14 18 7.2 8.2 q LoadCPb) eg/kg dt 14 79 47 <io <io q
ZinkCtn) mg/kg ds 49 180 370 CO 40 Mineral* die Minerale olie (C10-C12) ng/kgds
4.1 <3.0 <3.0 Mineral* olie (C12-C14) ng/kgds <S.O <S.O <5.0
Mineral* olie (C14-C21) mg/kg dt
9.3 <4.0 <4.0 Mineral* oli* (C21-C30) ag/kg
dt
30 24 <12 Mineral* oH* (C30-C35) mg/kg d> « 22 19 14 Minerale oil*
(C35-C40) mg/kg dt 13 17 if Q Minerale olie totaal (C10-C40) ag/kg ds <38 100 43 39
<38 Chronatogran olie (6C) Zie bfjl. Ziebtjl. Zlebijl. Somparomst*!*
organobatogeee vefbladingen 0. E0X mg/kg ds <0.10 0.11 <0.10 0.17 <0.10
Polycyclisdhe Aroma tische Koolwaterstoff «n, PflK q Naftaleen ng/kgds <0.010 0.045
0.017 0.012 <0.010 q ftcenaftyleen ng/kgds <0.050 <0.050 X0.0S0 <0.050
<O.OS0 Q fleenafteen ng/kgds <0.010 O.024 0.039 O.Oll <0.010 0. Fluoreen
ng/kgdt <0.010 0.038 0.032 <0.010 <0.019 Q Fenanthreen ng/kgdt <o.oio 0.34
0.27 0.044 o.03l Q flnthraeeen ng/kgds <0.0060 0.074 0.048 0.OO75 <0.0050 q
Fluoranttieen ng/kgds <0.010 0.72 0.42 COS? <0.010 q Pyreen ng/kgds <0.010 0.E3
0.28 0.044 <0.010 q B«nz<>(a)anthr«c**n ng/kgdt <0.010 0.37 0.15 0.041
<0.010 Mr. Kontteromteb.Ijving »naly*ico-nr. 1(1,50-3,00) 3135814 2(0,10-0,40)
8158817 3(0,10-0,50) 5136818 4(0,10-0,50) 8135819 5(0,10-0,80) 8135820 V door KM OMcertAtMftf*
vurichtfot
: MM .r*«i>d» Verrtefctlnfl s: as S806 ortnod* rtrtXtolaa twoflno Umlytfco
B.V. #lt wrtlfjcoe t moa uttduitend -In lijn «th««lvor4*n sordpwdu*****^^,
cltdovap.
«j-4«
M. +si (oyu 742 «J oo it* aino S4 *
M «*« iurefin«8i>«litlca».v. U ISO
M0i:3»o«««e«rtHK««rd door.uayo"* Ngj|^ 917S IB 00ln«Wld fa«»:WIIUi«H VWMWto.
»Q««n«k«f4wh»«^~te*w»««<ey»i(»np«o. Wl), TKTffl P.O. Box4S» C-*«U tnfo*oi«ilrtlre.eo«
ntt<i.u.ns«i MttmwInotwHtOI). h«tWooB* stwMt {MtHE-OWB) *
,n
* S770M1
tarn*rcldm site www.onotjtleo.CMi («¦». OIHMil on door de oY»rti.d«i ven rrenkrijlc ee liatabure
CTO. KVfl L010
I Belgium ftnalyseeortificaat U* projactnuaaor 09/865 Proloflls Certiftcewtnumitur
»00?200032 Uw projcctnaejs , 09/845 EBO Prologis Kopstal Stortdotua i7-12-2009
Uwordvrnuanor 09/845 Prolosis Ropportogedatum 24-12-2009/09:03 Dcrtun norvsternoae
14-12-2009 Bijiag* B,C Monsternomer ASfl Pagina 3/4 analyse Eenheld i 2 3~~ 4
i 0, Chfyseen ng/kg ds <0.0i0 0.31 0.14 0.04S 0.011 O. 3»Rio(b)fluoponth»»n
ng/kg ds <0.010 0.34 0.15 0.071 0.016 q Benzo(k)fluoranth*on ng/kg ds <0.0io 0.16
0.073 0.02* <0.010 Q Benu>(a)pyr«en ng/kg ds <0.0tO 0.30 0.13 0.034 0.011
0, Dibonsfl(flfi)onthr«cecn ng/kg ds <0.010 0.0S0 0.021 <0.010 <0.010 Q
Beri20(ghi)p«ry!ttn ng/kg ds <0.010 0.22 0.12 0.035 <0.010 Q Xnd*no(123-cd)pyreen
rag/kg ds <0.010 0.14 0.12 0.042 <0.010 Q PfiK Totocl EPS (14) ng/kg ds <0.20 3.?
2.0 0.55 <0.20 Y7\ 1 PBKTotoolVR0M(10) ng/kg ds <0.09S 2.9 1.8 0.42 <0.09S
Mr. Monst«rom*dirgvmg Bnalytico-iir. 1(1,50-2,00) 5135516 2 (0,10-0,40) 5135817
3(0,10-0,80) 5135818 4(0,10-0,50) 5135819 8(0,10-0,50) 5138820 «: 4ooc
«ys
t*eta*4ttnrae
»irlchtiag
«: W04 .rl.nd. ontlcktlKg
r, M JOSS «rlc«f»l«v«richtiac
tarofln* snofrtfco B.V. Bit nrtMcaat «oj uitHiiltand in Ufa «ok*el wonton g««prw»w««3.,5~.
sndnMg4t-« TW. +?l (o;« 2*2 «OS 8BKflURV It (3 74 <J4 titferhninalytlsofl.v. IiBO »M.l:
2fl0««ecBrt3fle««rt dowllo/di^^Ji^ 377(IIS S«M>«M rox«l<0)W242«J»7 HT/1WIB. »«B*fl
OfkmtftfosrllBtlflasaM SnrMt «YflW am Sep. IKQ, Tt«TCM P.O. BOX4S* C-ata(nfo8oocfrtlco.coB
HUJ43.t4.UJ.B0J hetBro«»(s»e«we«tCBHO, (i»tw«als« sowest (BSBJIt-OW) IBSlHi S77B M ImmM M
SUeww.onoSytlw.con Crt Re. 098BB4SS widoor d»ora>hci!en»oi< rrankrU* «n torn Burg 04). B»A
1010
t Belgium Analysacertificaat 11* projeetnunner 09/666 Prologil
Certifieaatnumnier 2009200032 Uw proj*ctnaan 09/8*5 E80 Protogls Herstot Startdatun
17-12-2009 Uwordemunner 09/665Prolog!* Uopportaaedatun 24-12-2009/09:03 Datim
nensUrnaa* 14-12-200? Bijloge R,c konstememer ASA Paglrta 3/6 _j___E5E53 i 7
i t
-
t« Bad*mfcundlg* anoJy*** q Drageitof *(«/n) 81.4 61.2 66.6 62.6
s*. 9 Hetalcn Q B.(seen(Bs) ag/kgds <10 <10 <I0 tl <lo Q
Cadaiua(cd) ng/kgds <0.*0 0.62 <0.40 l.S <0.40 q Kobolt (Co) ng/kgds 6.1 7.6 6.6
7.6 8.2 Q ChraOR<Cr) ng/kgds 34 25 22 SO 17 .s Q Kop*r(Cu> ng/kgds 12 13
6.2 16 6.6 V_X Q Kwik(Hg) ag/kgds <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Q
Nikkei (NO ag/kgds 26 tl 16 tl 1* 0. lood(Pb) ng/kgds <10 26 <10 66 <10
Q Unk(Zn) ng/kgds 46 93 S3 160 27 NtawaU «¦¦ Mineral* oHe (C10-C12) ag/kg
ds Mineral* olie(C12-C16) «g/kg at Mineral* oil* (C16-C21) Bg/kg ds
Mineral* olie (C21-C30) ng/kg ds Mineral* oil* (C30-C36) ng/kgds Mineral*oil*
(C38-C40) ag/kgds Q Mineral* oBe totaal (C10-C4Q) ogAg ds <36 <s» <3S <se
<38 Somparameter organohcriogeen verbindingea 9. tox ng/kgds <0.10 <o.io
<o.io O.ts <o.lO Pelycydlsca* firemotisehe Koorwotcrstoffen, PSK q
Hoftaleen ng/kg ds <o.oio <o.0io <o.oto <O.Oio <o.010 q ae*nafty!*en
ng/kgds *o,oso <o.oso
<o.obo
<o.oso
<o
;
oso
0,
Beenefteen ng/kgds <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 -Sgv q Fluoreen
ng/kgds <0.010 X0.010 X0.01O <0.010 <0.010 1§A» q Fenanthreen ag/kgds <0.010
<O.0lO <0.0iO 0.047 -(0.010 q nnthraceen ag/kgds <0.00SO <O.OOS0 <0.OO5O
0.0090 <O.0OS0 q Nuoranthetn ag/kgds <o.oio <o.0io <o.oio
o.ib
0.019 q Pyreen ng/kg ds <0.010 <0.010 <0.01O 0.11 <o.010 q
Benzo(a)emthrac*en ng/kgds XO.olO <0.010 <0.OlO 0.088 <0.oi0 q Chrysecn ng/kgds
<0.010 <0.010 <0.0iO 0.063 <0.010 q B*nzo(b)f1uoranth**n ng/kgds <0.010
<0.010 <0.01O 0.11 <o.0lo q Benzo(k)fluorantheen ng/kgds <0.010 <0.010
<0.01C 0.048 <0.010 Mr. Montteromschrljvlng Anolytieo-nr. 6(1,50-2,00)
5135821 7(0,00-0,60) 5135822 6(0,00-0,50) B13B823 9 (0,00-0, BO) B136B24 10(1,60-2,00) 5135625
«: tosr KM s«0M*»dH««rte Y»rri»ttag ft: »PO« irkmdt wrrlefctlng s: M «m wkwa*
»»frt»Hni rurofins «oely«co B.V. Pit c«rtIfie«ot»i9 ultiloHtudlll «»»
*«
< wwUfl
»er«pro<foc»«rd.^s&. «lliow.j«-« M. +51 (»)!« 2«43C0 MH SMK 14 B9 71«o
luroflrtiRMIjrtira S.Y. Itxs«9.pb>: »oo« gecsrtMnvrt daot U>y4> Ng||§^ 37»» N9
sameraM
mj
t ji W)K 54j «3 »» r»T/eT« He. : *;n «n arievnO door h«t WiiaBwBWtsKoviui «n
o«p. uit>,
t3TS»1
P.O. BoKI? t-noil l»foiPaool]rtlco.coE m (04 J.l«.t»J-»»l
hrt IrwolM tintlt frm), UtWwh* enrtil <pa««!-OWB)
»
Bf 3770 »t imnM Kl SK*
www.onoljrtlco.con K« «e. 0>«s««SJ. en ioor di s««rli>d*n nc rrtmSHJis in lui«ebur9 OirtJ.
rwA L010
I Belgium Rnelysecertiflcaat Uw pro>ctnoo>B)«r Q9/S6S Prc-logl*
C«rtificaatnunn*r 2009300039 Ow jjrojeetnaoit 09/8o5 EB0 Prologis Hersto.1 Stortdotim
17-12-0009 Uw ord-rnummer 09/8SS Prol-als Rapportagedotuo. 24-12-8009/09:03 Datum
nonstemame 14-13-2009 Bijlagt fi,C MoRStornaaer RSfl Pagina */6 ___icnhefd 1 7
~ i T~ to Q B»nio(a>pyr-en ng/kg ds <0.010 <0.01Q <0.010 0.085 <0.010
Q Dfbon.o(ah)-nthrac.*n rag/kg d* <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 0.
8«nzoCgh0p-ryl««n og/Icgds <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.0io Q
lnd*no(t23C_>pyi._n -_/-fl d* <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.0i0 <0.010 0. PRK
Tota-I JPR (10 -g/kgdt <0.20 <0.20 <0._0 0.74 <0.20 q PJtK Totaol VMM (10)
ng/kgds <0.09S <0.09S <0.09S 0.51 <0.09B b ,,r.
Mont<«»om*cfirijving Bnalytico-gir. « d (1,BO-3,00) 8138821 7 7(0,00-0,80)
8138022
8(0,00-0,80) S13S823 9(0,00-0,80) 813S824 10(1,50-2,00) 8135828
«; deer (HI
smco*
leerdt »*irtdi_Bf, R: SP04 orkendeMwkbtlns f. IB
SOU trktlif*
tRfdltlrx lurafla Unar/tko o.v. »lt certifies* t -Sf -utorttrwJ la i(J»
oehoel wer-m g*rei>re*»e»er*.^s^ fiMnqu-41 T»t. *M (o)M 343*3 o»
mh
AMliO (4
is 74 41* turofinj HiMlytiO) o.Y. i» ISO »oo«: loci gccor-fkecri.doarUarft Xg||§^
J77J
nb
B___r»eJd fax*3im**a***9tt <nt/tV*no.
ii^mm^^^^.h*t^u»t*titii*fitwi».-l»fr-Wl>t TCCTCU ».a.*ex4f* t-aen
lnfoOeaolrtlce.ee> nu»4J.«4.u».»o» h»t0fo»«_w0»*«*tO«H>.het»Bfllw«»w«»t«S»lfe-0W0) «_- «
1770« gernereMKL site www.encI)rttce.coB K«K*e. o*ee)e-3 eefloor do orerheden ion rronkrlfk en
LuwubiMg 0««>.
» L010
I Belgium Aitalysecmrtificaat Uw prtjortnUBmef 09/865 Prologis
Certifleaatnuroroer 3009200033 Uw projectneen 09/845IBO Prologis Herstcl Startdotyn
17-12-3009 Uw ordernummer 09/845 Prelaws Ropportogedetun 24-12-2009/09:03 Datum
monst*rna«* i*-i2-aoo? aijlog* B,C Monstemener SSfl Pagina 5/6 analyst Eenheld 11
12 Bodemkandlge analyse* Q Drerjestof %(n/n) 02.3 8*. 7 Hatelan
q firseen (Hs) ng/kg ds <io <10 q Cadmium <Cd> ng/kg ds 1.5 <0.40
Q Cobalt (CO) ng/kg ds 0.9 9.0 Q Chroom (Cr) mg/kg ds 32 34 /~\ q koper (cu)
mg/kg it 17 11 W q Kwlk(Hg> ng/kg ds 0.13 <O.10 q Nikkei (Mi) ag/kgdt 19
26 q load 0»b) ng/kg ds OS 13 q Jink Ctn) ng/kg ds 180 48 Mineral*
alia Mineral* all* (C10-C12) mg/kg ds Hinerale oil* (C12-C1.) mg/kg ds
Mineral* oli* (C16-C21) mg/kg ds Mineral* olie (C21-C30) ng/kg ds Mineral*
olie (CS0-C3S) ng/kg ds Mineral* olie (CSS-C40) Mg/kg ds q Mineral* oik totaal
(ClO-CdO) mg/kg d* <3« <38 Somporameter organohologeea vcrbindingen q EOX
mg/kg ds <0.10 <0.10 Pciycyclische flromotistlie Kooiwaterstoff en, MK q
Maftaleen ng/kg ds <0.01O <0.010 q ftcenaftyteen mg/kg ds <9.0$o <o.oso
q ac*naft*en mg/kg ds <0.010 <0.010 a q Flueraen ng/kg ds <0.010
<0.010 q enenthreen mg/kg ds 0.042 <0.010 q Rnthreeeen mg/kg ds <O.00S0
<0.0050 q Nuoronthenn ng/kg ds 0.O04 <0.010 q Pjrreen mg/kg ds 0.040
<O.O10 q Benz«(a)anthrae«*n mg/kg ds 0,043 <0.010 q Chryseen mg/kg ds 0.050
<0.010 q Benz*(b)flu*ranthe*n mg/kg ds 0.054 <0.010 q B«n»(k)flueronth*en
mg/kg ds 0.024 <o.Olo Hr. HonsteromscbrQvlng Hnelytiee-nr. 11 11(0,00-0,50)
5135024 12 12 (0,00-0, SO) 5135527 «! «ow ««« seectiatfItMrtf*. vMrlchtlng «!
are* tritnie uerriehtlns s: *S »
» »tk«M«wrrWrti** . turatlra SeWytlw ».v. SH eertlflteot
*¦ ultdislttiio
-
In iio etliesl wordm
uv*ro4ttt*«rcL^^
sild,»«
0
"-ia t«t.+3i<6Jsi«3*sos «*NM«o J<|J7**M IvrafiM mulrttTO
b.v.
|»
isb
tee-i: so»« gfrVVmti <J«r Uoyd-i V^l [^ CT7i m saramld r«x»3l
<a)s* «*49»t v«T/«lwilo, . t«n«nMend«w*tt>l»»»»s«wt<o«M »n»«>. tilt), TtSTtu
».o.Be»««» e-ioll InfoeoneljrWco.co*
»*ms.u.si3.bsi
.-.. h.tBro»«rt»«c«*trt
Ojim),
li«tw«oh«6«w«s«(oauie-owo) .¦. ItslfcN 3770 «i HiHnld HI ate
www.anolrtieo.co I« Ho. 0T0S342J en dcoi <(« o»«rfi«!«n ran frenkHjk *o lUK»«6*g OOT- R»*
UJ10
vettrorms Belgium Rruriysecertificaat Cw projtetnunmef 09/865
Protasis CtrtiffeaatmimiMr 200*200032 Uw projeetnaom 09/S6S EBO prolog!* Herstal
Startdotun I7-12-200? Ow ordernuamer 09/8«S Prologit Ropportagsdotura
24-12-2009/09:03 Dotud Bonstwnane li-122009 Sijlofle fl,C Monst*m«*»r USA Pogina
t/t
n«ly«e £enh«ld 11 12 Q Benxo(a)pyre*n mg/kg d* 0.04.4 <0.010 Q
Pibtnz«(ah)anthr«c*«n «g/kg ds <o.oio <o.oio Q Benio(ghl)p»ryleer. ag/fcgds
<0.010 <0.01Q Q Inrfcno<123-«J>pjrre«n lag/kg ds <0.010 <0.010
0. PRK Totaal EPR (1A> mg/kg ds 0.40 <0.20 Q PB>CTotaalVR0M(10) mg/kg ds 0.2?
<0.W6
©
Mr. Monstaromscbrijvtog BooJytleo-»r. 11(0,00-0,80) S13S828
12(0,00-0,80) 8138827 «: tear »« gtacuwtttMrtt *«rrlchttng flickoord a: ns>04
t»k«o» Tsfflcfcting Pr.coSfd. 5: (ss woo
rioAOt vtiricfttiag j^jg Busfbu
Haalytfco B.V. Bit «rtW««ot ¦«« ultsloiwno In ajo gtti**l wordm ier«produ«w4^^^ OHdmeg
44-44 T«l. +Si &)S4 9494X00 BOB RMS M IJ 74 4S4 [UKfiBI 8a«l]PtkO ».Y. i» JSD W01: SOOI
gOCOTttTiCMTd doorUojUTsNg||§^ S771HB loramld Fox+11 (0)34 Z42 «t ft W/Biwxe.
to.fl.m«*«nii Hoof h«tVlooaie «e««t (OWH tn0»?. 1*0. TCCTHl P.O.Box***
t-aoiliofo9eneljtlco.e»»
si«04J.j4.««j.doi
t»tBn»scH«c»>«t
(mm),
hVtwoslw
govntBoont-oro) IfcoltW W7»* ¦aworiMM »t» www.aiMlrtico.coa
k»b mo.
0*001420 on
Door do ortrliodoo ran FfonkHjko* ttaenbwg {Ml». RM 1010
¦ft-.-,.V**$!$$- ¦ ., ; -T:
^¦\¦::¦/¦ Jx\:0^
V
V ; ;£:\-\¦"
¦¦
^eurofins
:r
¦ : Belgium Bijlage (A) met deelmonsterinformotle
behorcnde b|l analyswertif icaat 2009200032 Pogina t/i
Rnalytico-n Boornr Deehnoastw Omschtijviag Van Tot Bareod* NOMtar«n*clw|ving 8136814
0805121021 1(1.30-2.00) E13S617 0S0S12073S 4(6,10-0.40) B135616 0805120736
3(0,10-0,60) 8138819 0SO5120730 4(0,10-0.80) 0606121098 5 (0,10-0. BO) 0608120691
4(1,50-2,00) (p\ 8138623 0805120486 7(0.00-0.60) 6138823 0608120681 8(0,00-0,50) 8138824
0S0512O468 9 (0.00-0,80) S13S825 0SO5120484 10(1.50-2,00) S138824 0505120666 11
(0.00-0.50) 6135827 0*08121029 12(0,00-0,80) @ . tarotte* »oofytfco
B.V. aumgu-*t
t»i.
*3»0i)3<a«»sao aHiwnnii7i<H toroflat fctairUco.a.V. I*
1M N6U3MK g*»rtifle*«r<l 4sor iMyft 3771MI »«ran<Id Ioi»a(ii)»iU5«Jj VHT/»T».«».
R«»,«n trlr«r>* <J«wrh«t «aa»M Cms* <ov«K « Sop. IS!) ___t.tt.tatlit
E-aatlTQf«0cuiotrtieo.«ra Bl«04S.u.io*.00i h«« Brmsil » sewctt
OjUO,
&
* Aitedts s»w>t
0>CJtHS-0WB) 1778 01 BmiiM H Ht« w,«n«l»tleo.eo« M«g. onuns M ifooj at ownadM
too
fMttofk «n iimakurg 0»tW.
#euwfins . ¦^¦w^->-. ¦.; Belgium Bijiage (C) met
metfoodevefwljziregen behorende bij onalyseeartifleoot 2009200032 Pogine i/i
Bnaljrce Method* r*eha;*k RtfaMnttenctfaod* Vermoiing (cryogeen, <«i kg) W0104
crushen Cf. HVR 7313 Droge«tof W010< S/ovimetri* Sw. NEN-ZSO IWlM CMfl 2/ZI/R.i
AES/XCP Rrseen (As) W0417 XCP-MS Cf. MEM »Mo «Hcf.CM8 2/X/B.l RES.1CP Cadmium (C«J>
WO/17 ICP-flES Cf. MEN 6966 e« cf.CMft 2/I/B.l RES/JCP Cobfllt (Co) W0417 ICP-fiES Cf. NEH
«9« Oft ef.CMfl 2/I/B.l RES/1CP ehroom(Cr) W0417 ICP-flES Cf. NEH 6966 en ttf.CMfl
2/Z/B.l RES/ICP Keper(Cu) W0417 ICP-flES Cf. HER «
?« en cf.CMR S/X/B.i SES/ZCP
Kwik (Hg) W0417 ICP-RES Eigon BOthodo / ««lljkw. EH UB3: 1»?7 i.b. SSS/ICP Nikkei (NO
W0417 ICP-ftES Cf. M8UM4 en ef.CMfl 2/I/B.i RES/ICP lood(Pb) W0417 ICP-RES Cf. SEN«.9«o on
ef.CKfi 2/1/6.1 ftES/ICP Zink (Zn) W0417 XCP-BES Cf.ttNMManef-.CMA9/X/B.l
Mineral* Oil* (GO W0202 GC-FZD Eigan method* Chfonotogrem MO («C) W0202 GC-FID Eigen
»*thod* EOX W03S1 Kierocouloaetrie Eigon method* ___PBK (EPS) WOSOi HPIC Cf. NEW
«»77 vj Nader* informotie over do toegeposte Oftderzeektnethoden altmede een
elosslficotie von 4c neetonzekerheid ttaan vermeld in ons ovenjcht Speelfieatles analyseaetheden,
versie juSi 200?. @ tvreflnt flnalrtlco B.V. aH»9*iU-il T*l. ?« (0>M
M2 63 00 KMTIMM)IIII7«414 suiefins Bnoljtkio I.V. i« J»« »oot: »»«« j«»rtHlc»»rtl doorUoyd-s
*7»» ¦
HnmU laxtumzt 2i2*3*>
vht/bTVNo.
a5R«n«riten<id<»rhttv)ooo»»o«w«
:
t<9V»ni«iieop, ax), P.O. Box*i»
e-e«0 Nf»
©
onaljt!eo.coD uui!.u.H3,Bii hot (nuMfe* smst IWfc be« wooljo ««wort«o«Ke-SKt)
w»» M mmM HI site www.onotrtico.coa (vxno. atdmiz en 4o« dto».ro«dtn wn frenKrg* «o liuonbu/c.
CNM>.
EUROFINS BELGIUM
CHROMATOGRAM TPH/MINERAL OIL SAMPLE ID 5135817
CERIFICATE NO:-2009200032
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 2(0,10-0,60)
EUROFINS BELGIUM
CHROMATOGRAM TPH/MINERAL OIL SAMPLE ID 5135818
CERIFICATE NO:-2009200032
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 2(0,10-0,60)
EUROFINS BELGIUM
CHROMATOGRAM TPH/MINERAL OIL SAMPLE ID 5135819
CERIFICATE NO:-2009200032
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 2(0,10-0,60)
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
43
GEDAS
Project number: 03/3043
Drafted by MC
according to the current legislation there is no contamination above the intervetnion
values on the site
no additional soil investigation should be conducted on the site
the slightly elevated concentrations of heavy metals are natural background values, and
of no concern
the parcels should not be registered as polluted soils
no remedial action is necessary
Topographical map
Cadastral data
Colouring of the research site according to land use
Detailed map research site
Detailed map detected soil contamination
Detailed map detected groundwater contamination
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
47
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
49
Project
09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
51
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
53
SFF Finances
Adminietration GMnh da ta Documentation Patrimonial - Cadaatra
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
55
Project 09/865 ESI PROLOGIS BELGIUM III BVBA HERSTAL
57
Groundwater data
Underground Water
Page 1 of 1
Normal format
A4 format
A3 format
- Underground water supply points non drinkable in operation :
- Underground water supply points not in operation :
- Piezometers :
- Surface water supply points drinkable :
- Polluting premises :
DIR. X(M)
WORK
USE
OPER.
ZONE
LAYER
CONTACT
DISTANCE
HOLDER
Y(M)
TYPE
CODE
CODE
CODE
PREV.
CODE
NAME & TEL
1,088
N-O 234.910
155.620
PF
42/2/1/03
32
10
N
0
WINAND JOSEPH
WINAND JOSEPH
04/278.50.16
1,119
O 234.350
154.310
PF
42/2/4/001
31
50
N
305
SMASH SC
1,747
E 237.153
154.484
PF
42/2/5/002
24
50
N
0
MARC BRONCKAERS
R MC S.A.
04/278.10.37
DIR. X(M)
WORK
USE
OPER.
ZONE
LAYER
CONTACT
DISTANCE
HOLDER
Y(M)
TYPE
CODE
CODE
CODE
PREV.
CODE
NAME & TEL
755
S-E 236.050
154.250
PT
42/2/4/002
305
1,143
O 234.300
154.400
PT
42/2/4/003
305
1,809
N-E 236.170
156.300
PT
42/2/1/001
305
DISTANCE
DIR
X(M)
Y(M)
OPERATOR
WORK
TYPE
TELEPHONE
CODE
1,410
S
153.300
AXIMA S.A.
43/2/4/001
TOX
041/78.85.39
Code
Description
Taxable
Fee
00
Y
Y
01
Y
Y
02
Y
N
11
Y
Y
12
Y
Y
13
Y
Y
14
Y
Y
15
Y
Y
16
Y
Y
17
Y
Y
18
Y
Y
21
Y
Y
22
Y
Y
23
Y
Y
24
Y
Y
25
Y
Y
31
Y
Y
32
Y
Y
33
Y
Y
41
Y
Y
42
Y
Y
51
Y
Y
52
Y
Y
61
Y
Y
62
Y
N
71
Y
Y
81
Y
N
82
Y
Y
83
Y
N
84
Y
N
91
Y
Y
95
N
N
96
N
N
Code Type
Description
Quarry
Drain
Surface water
Excavation
Hillside tunnel
Tunnel accessible by shaft
Tunnel to de determined
Mine
Sunk shaft
Mine shaft
Natural shaft
Traditional shaft
Source at emergence
To be determined
Table
Labelled
Unknown or non existant
Quaternary undifferentiated
Sea dunes
Sea plains (Polders, Yser, Waardamma)
Flemish valley (Pleistocene, Bruges, Gand, NL border, Gand-Terneuzen)
Thalwegs de l ; Escaut and tributaries
Peaty alluvia of the Haine Valley
Thalwegs de la Meuse and tributaries
Meuse Valley terraces
Senne Valley alluvia
Merksplas sands
Pea bog layer
Mol and Brasschaat (Moseen) sands + Campine sands
Lillo and Poederlee formations
Formations of Kattendijk and Kasterlee
Miocene sands (Diestien, Anversien, Bolderien) + (Berchem, Genk, Houthalen)
Chattien sands (Boncelles)
Inferior Rupel Sands (Berg Sands)
Tongeren Sands (Neerepen Sands)
Kallo Complex (S3 or S2)
Kallo Complex (S1, Asse Sands)
Ledo-panisiliens and Ledo-bruxelliens Sands (Lede Bruxelles Vlierzele Aalter)
Brussels sands
Ypres sands
Undifferentiated Landenien
Sands from the upper Landenien L2
Glaucoferes Sands of the lower Landenien L1
Tufa-stone of the Landenien
Heersiennes marl (marl gelinder and sands of Orp)
Maastrichtiens Tufa-stone of the Geer
Captive groundwaterof the Maastrichtien
Captive chalks of Brabant and the two Flanders
Chalks of the Mons basin
Hesbaye chalks
Cretaceous undifferentiated of the Pays dHerve
Pays dHerve Chalks
Sands of Aachen in Pays dHerve
Cretaceous basin of Paris
Bajociens Limestone
Undifferentiated Virtonien
Macignos Virtonien (Macignos of Aubange and Messancy)
Sands and gres of Virton ( Lower Virtonien vra)
Undifferentiated Sinemurien
Sinemurien : development of Orval
Sinemurien : development of Florenvielle
Sands and Pudding-stones
Conglomerate of Stavelot
Undifferentiated carboniferous soil
Phtanite of the Namurien
Carboniferous Limestone of the Tournaisis (Mouscron Pecq Tournai)
Table
Labelled
Carboniferous limestone of northern edge of Namur basin
Carboniferous limestone of southern edge of Namur basin
Carboniferous limestone of the Vesdre massif
Carboniferous limestone of the Dinant bassin
Borinage geothermal carboniferous limestone
Campine carboniferous limestone
Devonian limestone of the northern edge of Namur basin
Devonian limestone of southern edge of Namur basin
Devonian limestone of Vesdre massif
Devonian limestone of Dinant basin
Montainous Schistocyte mass of the Ardenne (Gedinien, siegenien, emsien, couvinien)
Montainous Schistocyte mass of the Ardenne (Frasnien, Fammenien)
Montainous Schistocyte mass of Dinant Basin (Gedinien, siegenien, emsien, couvinien)
Montainous Schistocyte mass of Namur Basin (Frasnien, Fammenien)
Montainous Schistocyte mass of Vedre Basin (Frasnien, Fammenien)
Montainous Schistocyte mass of Dinant Basin (Frasnien, Fammenien)
Calmbro-silurien of the Ardenne : Superficial weathering groundwater
Calmbro-silurien of the Ardenne : groundwater of the deep cracks
Calmbro-silurien of the Brabant massif : Superficial weathering groundwater
Calmbro-silurien of the Brabant massif : groundwater of the deep cracks
Carbo-gaseous mineral waters
Industrial Zoning
GEDAS
Project number: 11/15/1844
Drafted by MC
No copies of the exploitation permits were available in Herstal during the visit.
According to the authorities no specific environmental problems were noticed except for some
complaints concerning noise. These were complaints from the local inhabitants to global transport
noise.
The surrounding companies are:
Techspace aero S.A.
Route de Liers, 121
4041 Milmort
T: 04/278.81.11
F: 04/278.52.07
Activity:
Production of aircraft engines and treatment of waste products related with the
production process. The activities are present since 30 to 40 years. No particular
problems were ever noticed.
Number on the Site Map: 103
Weerts
No adress available. This is a completely new site, still under construction.
The activity of
the site will be the transport of chocolates
Number on the Site Map: Indicated as Weerts on
the Site Map
Other companies in the neighbourhood.
Lair liquide Belge S.A.
Avenue du parc industriel, 2
4041 Milmort
T: 04/287.78.78
F: 04/278.67.47
Activity:
Filling up canisters with industrial gases
The activities are present since 6 à 7 years. No problems were
ever reported.
Number on the Site Map: 102
Gar. Collette Sprl (Mitsubishi)
Route de Liers, 122
4041 Milmort
T: 04/278.58.16
F: 04/278.71.14
Activity:
garage
Number on the Site Map: Not indicated
Galliker Transport & Logistics
Avenue du parc industriel
4041 Milmort
T: 04/287.01.01
F: 04/278.03.03
Activity:
The company is active in the transport
sector. Activities are present
since 1985-1990.
Number on the Site Map: 101
GEDAS
Project number: 11/15/1844
Drafted by MC
ISPC
Route de Liers, 125
4041 Milmort
T: 04/278.92.92
Activity:
A wholesale business (+ transport) in horeca requirements (food, cooking
utensils, etc. ). The company is located on the site since 2 years.
Number on the Site Map: 129
Van Dijck S.A.
Route de
Liers, 4-6
4041 Milmort
T: 04/278.73.25
F:
04/278.06.37
Activity:
Production of clinckers
Number on the Site Map: Not indicated on the Site map
Based on the review available documentation and the site visit, the current use of the surrounding
properties do not seem to represent any risk of potential contamination of the Site.
Building permit and reaction municipality of Herstal
Mevr.Sophie Houtmeyer
Skechers
Parc Industrial Hauts-Sarts, zone 3
Avenue du parc industriel 159
4041 Milmort
Belgium
Ing.C.A.Hommel
Project Manager ProLogis
May 6, 2008
Project ProLogis SkechersMilmort
Avenue du parc industriel 159,
4041 Milmort
Project Manager Prologis
Addendum:
Statistics of the building permit
Drawing 01/05
Drawing 02/05
Drawing 03/05
Drawing 04/05
Drawing 05/05
WALLOON REGION
Liege, 7 July 2008
REGISTERED LETTER
S.P.R.L. PROLOGIS Belgium III
J.E. Mommaerstslaan, 18
1831 DIEGEM
Our ref: E1256/BM/MRM
Enc.: 1 set of plans + notice
ACTS AND WORK OF PUBLIC BENEFIT
Has put in an application for a town planning permit relating to a
property located at HERSTAL (Liers), Avenue du Parc Industriel
land registry Section A. no. 450 e2, g2
with the purpose of constructing an industrial hall
General address: Rue des Brigades dIrelande 1, B-5100 Namur Tel: 081 33 21 11
Fax: 081 33 21 10.
www.wallonie.be
Toll free: 0800 11 901 (General information)
Our ref: E16256/BM/MRM
2/3
-
the SPI+, that its opinion requested on 21.05.2008 and sent on 28.05.2008 is
favourable;
-
considering that the project is detailed in an SPI+ zoning;
-
the I.I.L.E., that its opinion requested on 21.05.2008 and sent on 16.06.2008 is
favourable subject to conditions;
-
for public safety reasons;
-
the construction of an industrial hall (storage) of 22,275 m2 as an extension to an
existing hall;
Our ref: E16256/BM/MRM
3/3
-
respecting the I.I.L.E. opinion enclosed;
-
asking for the state of the pavement locality, the alignment and level as well as
indication of construction sites at least 60 days before the anticipated work start date,
by means of the form attached to this document. The applicants attention is drawn to the
municipal regulation relating to indication of construction sites in accordance with
article 137 of the C.W.A.T.U.P. and to the municipal charges regulation on the indication
of construction sites;
-
provide for ventilation of the company premises in accordance with standards in
effect;
-
provide for an inspection chamber or manhole at each junction and change of
direction of drainage piping;
-
access to the site must be carried out using a hydrocarbon covering enabling
differentiating the public domain from the private domain;
-
the pavement and water channel may not in any case be removed or modified;
-
the earth resulting from earthworks will be removed to an approved sorting centre for
inert waste. In no case will these be backfilled into the ground.
Andre DELECOUR
Manager
Correspondance with the archeological authorities
Liege, 12 [illegible]
GEDAS B.I. NV
Attention: Mrs M. CLERINX
Clara Snellingsstraat 27
2100 DEURNE
Our ref: D POJ/DA/SALg/jSml/mg/00325
Provincial archaeologist
Avenue des Tilleuls, 62
4000 Liège
Tél. 04/254 28 93 - 04/252 75 37
Fax 04/252 23 26
NUMÉRO VERT : 0800-1 190-1
Letter ref: DP/37/2001
Service Code no.: G.01.04.
Communication Service
Mrs Dominique POCET
ECRIDO.COM
Tel: 04/240.65.46
Fax: 04/240.64.93 - Email address:
Herstal, 11 January 2001
GEDAS NV
Attention Mrs
Marleen CLERINX
Clara Snellingsstraat, 27
2100 ANTWERPEN
Yours etc.
For the Mayor in absentia
The 1st Deputy Mayor
Richard BASTIN
Liege, 12 [illegible]
GEDAS B.I. NV
Attention: Mrs M. CLERINX
Clara Snellingsstraat 27
2100 DEURNE
Our ref: D POJ/DA/SALg/jSml/mg/00325
Provincial archaeologist
Avenue des Tilleuls, 62
4000 Liège
Tél. 04/254 28 93 - 04/252 75 37
Fax 04/252 23 26
NUMÉRO VERT : 0800-1 190-1
Letter ref: DP/37/2001
Service Code no.: G.01.04.
Communication Service
Mrs Dominique POCET
ECRIDO.COM
Tel: 04/240.65.46
Fax: 04/240.64.93 - Email address:
Herstal, 11 January 2001
GEDAS NV
Attention Mrs
Marleen CLERINX
Clara Snellingsstraat, 27
2100 ANTWERPEN
Yours etc.
For the Mayor in absentia
The 1st Deputy Mayor
Richard BASTIN
Environmental thick report
The report must include The Environmental Report Tick List below (which is necessary to demonstrate
to ourselves and our insurers that which our consultants have seen and not seen.) The Purpose of
this report is to identify environmental issues effecting the proposed purchase and development of
the proposed site. The list below will enabl Prologis to assess the items which the consultant has
considered and tabulates specific works but must not be taken as complete or limit the comments
made 1 the consultant which may effect the purpose of the Investigation This Form Must be completed
by the consultant and included in the Environmental Phase 1 Report Development Name GEDAS N. V.
Site Address Clara Snellingsstraat, 27 Consultant Practice 2100Deurne Name of Consultant
(individual) Herwig Teughels, Kristof Peperstraete Date of Visit | 22/08/2002 Review of existing
documents available Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; dated 5th October 2001, 03/3043
(neighbouring site) a. Environmental Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; report 11/15/1844 dated
18th January 2001,11/11/1844 Asbestos Geotechnical site investigation dated 29th November 2000,
03/3043 (neighbouring site) c. Geotechnical Geotechnical site investigation dated 23th January
2001,11/11/1844 Soil investigation dated 9th October 2000, 03/3043 (neighbouring site) Soil
investigation dated 4th September 2002,11/15/002415 (current site) d. Soil investigation
Topographical survey Topographical survey dated December 21st 2000,11/11/1844 Measurement plan
dated tfh November 2000, 03/3043 (neighbouring site) Measurement plan Measurement plan dated 61 of
January 2001,11/11/1844 g Building permit Building permit 23/2001 dated March 5th, 2001 Date: Page:
23th September2002 36/44
Cadastral plan cLd. August 2tfh, 2002 Zoning plan d.d.26/11/1987, Plan de secteurNr. 15 (Liege),
carte 42/2 Permit dAir Liquide d. d. 05/04/2000 Permit dAir Liquide d,d. 22/04/1994 Permit de
S.A. Techspace Aero d.d.02/10/1995 Permit de S>A, ISPC d.d.30/04/1998 Permit de Charlier
Transport d.d.17/08/1990 exploitation permits surrounding firms An update of these permits was
requested for Please tick the Box if seen or carried his Section to be filled in by the Consultant
Site description out Comments .ocation of Site Map Reference 1 Near Airport/ Rail /Major Road Power
Station Etc 1 Rough estimate of the shape of the site lea. 4 ha Brief description of topography 1
Site surroundings (specify radius of 1km of the site) Identifiable aspects of the site i.e.: ponds,
trees, water courses, drainage, services etc. jj ^courses visible Date: Page: 23th September2002
37/44
Records Review A desk top study using historical maps and other sources, local libraries and local
knowledge [reclaimed The use of any local data bases that may be held by the local building
inspector, planning office,H etc. BNot applicable Any historical data that can be gained from
adjoining land or properties HEurosense In discussion with any regulatory authorities, any
licences, consents or other data effecting the) site | I Reclaimed Mining or other intrusive
operations, reference to aquifers Site hydrogeology | Site Reconnaissance No visit inside the new
building has been executed. The surroundings were checked. H 1 Identification of items which may
effect the 1 I environmental issues on the site i.e.: Any underground or above ground tanks ^H f
Storage facilities for materials 1 | Waste disposal arrangements 1 | Evidence of spillages
Information i reclaimed from a the £ construction I Details of existing drainage services |
[company I Date: Page: I 23th September2002 38/44
Details of services- Information reclaimed from gas A.L.G. Information reclaimed from water the
S.D.W.E. Information reclaimed from electricity A.L.E. sewers (septic tanks) Bplan Indications of
previous use i.e.: manufacturing processes, demolition evidence, use of pesticides l ^l Evidence of
flooding or knowledge of water table (probable depth, direction of flow) 1 Surface water hydrology
1 Local wildlife/ecology H Electro magnetic fields Helectrical towre Details of superficial
deposits (side of Weerts Date; Page: 23th September2002 39/44
Footpaths and rights of way
Local population, including traffic impact assessment 1 Environmental Matters Any evidence of
endangered species 1 SSIs (Special Scientific Interest) sites or ecological resources, (e.g.:
newts, stream diversions, B landscaping, designation as a site of special scientific interest or an
area of outstanding natural 1 beauty, wetlands etc.) H The site or surroundings that may affect air
quality 1 Sound restrictions (potential impact of noise during construction and final development
stage) I Light pollution (any future development shading existing buildings or vice versa) H
Registered and potential landfill sites 1 Surface water drainage and hydrology and evidence of
flooding, including the identification oil To check for signs of Japanese Knotweed, Himalayan
Balsam, Giant Hogweed and other non-H native, invasive and destructive vegetation. (psto Interviews
Interview or telephone conversation with existing owners, agents or occupiers J HConfidential
Interview with possible occupants Date: Page: 23th September2002 40/44
Existing Structures In addition to the above, if buildings are on the site, then each building is
to be reviewed and the following ascertained: Interview or telephone conversation with existing
owner or agent No activities The current use and previous use of the buildings (occured on site The
current or previous use of adjoining properties H2.2.8. Possible industrial processes B Possible
landfill areas 1 Evidence o f industrial dumping 1 Evidence of any chemical storage on site i.e.:
drums Evidence of any ponds or lagoons used within the waste treatment process ^ Evidence of vent
pipes Hl g Points of discharge from any of the drainage on site a) § Evidence of existing sub
stations, gas meter houses or pumping stations Name, address and contact number for each of the
owners of the properties Internal observations of existing buildings i.e.: machinery, processes,
tanks, asbestos Hchecked I Do the regulatory authorities know the current company? Hpermit
Evidence of termite infestation bno Date: Page: 23th September2002 41/44 1 a
Confirmation from the Structural Engineer appointed for the project to comment upon the Further
Items For Consideration Environmental Phase I report (if appointed) Any archaeological requirements
which may impact upon the site development Presence of minerals/geotechnical faults/any other
problem disclosed by the Desktop Study The assessment of data in summary form following the factual
reporting on the above. To include Evaluation Of Data comments on the possible impact on
construction. Note that the purpose of a Phase IT is to answer a specific question and should be
specific with regards to methodology and scope.
ADDENDUM 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR THE AVAILABILITY OF SPACE FOR THE STORAGE OF
GOODS
AND OFFICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THIS DATED AUGUST 12, 2002 |
1. | On August 12, 2002 ProLogis and Skechers International have signed an Agreement for the availability of space for the storage of goods and offices for the management of this concerning the following real estate: ProLogis Park Liège Distribution Center I with a total surface area of approximately 22,458 m 2 and approximately 100 car parking spaces located in the Industrial Park Hauts-Sarts, Milmort, Liège, Avenue du Parc Industriel (hereafter referred to as the Availability Agreement); |
2. | On August 27, 2003 Skechers International transfered all its rights and obligations under the Availability Agreement to Skechers EDC in full accordance with the terms and conditions thereof. |
HAVE AGREED THE FOLLOWING: |
1 |
Duration of the Availability Agreement
Article 5 of the Availability Agreement is replaced as follows : |
The availability of the Premises is rendered for a duration of five (5) years as of the Commencement Date provided for in the Availability Agreement DC II, i.e. in principle on 1 April 2009, to which is referred to as the Commencement Date , unless parties confirm otherwise in writing (if the availability of the Premises starts later than 1 April 2009 and insofar as mutually agreed upon in writing by the Parties). |
If either party does not terminate the Agreement by registered mail not later than twelve (12) months prior to the end of the duration set forth in the first paragraph of this Article, i.e. in principle March 31, 2014 or the date as agreed upon between parties in writing as set forth in the preceding paragraph, this Agreement shall be tacitly renewed under the same terms as stipulated in this Agreement for subsequent periods of five (5) years in the absence of the required termination notification by either party, without prejudice to Article 20 and without any compensation to ProLogis nor VAT adjustment to be paid, except as set forth in article 2 of this Agreement. This Agreement will however in any case end by operation of law on the latter of the following dates : March 31, 2029 or the twentieth anniversary of the Commencement Date as agreed upon in writing by the Parties as set forth in this Article. After the latter of these dates, this Agreement can not be renewed in accordance with this paragraph. |
Notice needs to be given by bailliffs writ or by registered letter. Notices hereunder shall be deemed given and effective (i) if delivered by a bailiff, upon delivery, or (ii) if sent by certified or registered mail, within five (5) days of deposit in the post office. |
2.1 | The other terms and conditions of the Availability Agreement remain fully applicable between parties with respect to the Premises, except for Articles 20 and 22 of the Availability Agreement which are no longer applicable due to the decision of the CUSTOMER not to commit to use DC III and DC IV. | |
No amendment or modification of this Addendum shall take effect unless it is in writing and is executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties. | ||
2.2 | If one or more of the provisions of this Addendum is declared to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under the applicable law, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not in any way be affected. In the case whereby such invalid, illegal or unenforceable clause affects the entire nature of this Addendum, each of the parties shall use its best efforts to immediately and in good faith negotiate a legally valid replacement provision. |
/s/ Gerrit Jan Meerkerk
|
/s/ David Weinberg | |
|
||
Gerrit Jan Meerkerk,
|
David Weinberg, | |
ProLogis Belgium II Sprl
|
Skechers EDC |
Skechers DC#2 Milmort, ADDITIONAL WORKS TI
INVESTMENT
RESPONSIBLE
RESPONSIBLE
Cost Skechers
Cost
OWNED BY
MAINTENANCE *
RENEWAL **
direct
Prologis
SKECHERS
PROLOGIS
SKECHERS
PROLOGIS
SKECHERS
PROLOGIS
Items additional to the Contract Specification
5.2
22,050.00
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.3
7,350.00
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.4
18,201.92
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.5
179,295.84
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.7
24,363.09
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.8a
2,076.90
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.8b
7,703.69
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.9
5,826.12
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.10
124,676.12
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.11
105,515.56
addendum 1
X
addendum 1
5.12a
23,665.15
X
X
X
5.12b
108,888.71
X
X
X
5.13
12,086.54
X
X
X
5.15
8,821.84
X
X
X
5.16
1,653.60
X
X
X
5.17
8,880.62
X
X
X
5.19
475.00
X
X
X
5.20
5,889.00
X
X
X
5.21
5,530.00
X
X
X
5.22
5,135.00
5,135.00
X
X
X
5.23
1,577.49
X
X
X
5.24
4,240.36
X
X
X
5.26
675.44
X
X
X
5.27
1,775.00
1,775.00
X
X
X
5.28
2,234.60
X
X
X
5.29
3,940.00
3,940.00
X
X
X
6.1
11,413.71
X
X
X
6.4
49,524.93
X
X
X
6.5
43,190.95
X
X
X
6.6
1,537.60
X
X
X
6.7
9,392.17
X
X
X
6.8
5,789.41
X
X
X
6.11
25,889.94
X
X
X
6.13
987.48
X
X
X
6.14
11,439.46
X
X
X
6.15
6,779.59
X
X
X
6.16
4,901.00
X
X
X
6.17
2,100.00
2,100.00
X
X
6.19
3,153.13
X
X
X
*
Maintenance as indicated in the lease agreement and the general terms and conditions.
**
Renewal as indicated in the lease agreement and the general terms and conditions.
|
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.,
a Delaware corporation |
|||
|
||||
|
/s/ David Weinberg
|
|||
|
Title: Chief Operating Officer |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | ||
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | ||
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | ||
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | ||
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
/S/ ROBERT GREENBERG
|
|||
|
Chief Executive Officer |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | ||
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | ||
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | ||
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | ||
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
/S/ DAVID WEINBERG
|
|||
|
Chief Financial Officer |
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | ||
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ ROBERT GREENBERG
|
||
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
August 6, 2010
|
||
|
||
/s/ DAVID WEINBERG
|
||
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
||
August 6, 2010
|